中文 · EN

《南华真经》Vol. 1

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 Vol. 1 / 4 25,000 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南华真经》 Vol. 1 (Taixuan 太玄部, 4 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 54 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南华真经》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南华真经 > 经名:南华真经,收录于《中华道藏》四子真经。 目录 卷一 内篇逍遥游第一 内篇齐物论第二 内篇养生主第三 内篇人间世第四 内篇德充符第五 卷二 内篇大宗师第六 内篇应帝王第七 外篇骈拇第八 外篇马蹄第九 外篇肪筐第十 外篇在宥第十一 卷三 外篇天地第十二 外篇天道第十三 外篇天运第十四 外篇刻意第十五 外篇缮性第十六 外篇秋水第十七 外篇至乐第十八 卷四 外篇达生第十九 外篇山木第二十 外篇田子方第二十一 外篇如知北游第二十二 杂篇庚桑楚第二十三 杂篇徐无鬼第二十四 杂篇则阳第二十五 卷五 杂篇外物第二十六 杂篇寓言第二十七 杂篇让王第二十八 杂篇盗蹶第二十九 杂篇说剑第三十 杂篇渔父第二十六 杂篇寓言第二十七 杂篇让王第二十八 杂篇盗蹶第二十九 杂篇说剑第三十 杂篇渔父第三十一 杂篇列御寇第三十二 杂篇天下第三十三 庄子
Interpretation

The Nanhua True Scripture is the Daoist honorific title for the Zhuangzi. It is included in the Four Masters’ True Scriptures in the Chinese Daoist Canon. The work is divided into the Inner Chapters, Outer Chapters, and Miscellaneous Chapters, and contains thirty-three chapters in all.

Volume One contains the Inner Chapters “Free and Easy Wandering,” “Discussion on Making All Things Equal,” “The Essentials for Nurturing Life,” “In the Human World,” and “The Sign of Complete Virtue.”

Volume Two contains the Inner Chapters “The Great and Venerable Teacher” and “Responding as an Emperor,” and the Outer Chapters “Webbed Toes,” “Horses’ Hooves,” “Horse’s Gizzard,” and “Letting Be and Exercising Forbearance.”

Volume Three contains the Outer Chapters “Heaven and Earth,” “The Way of Heaven,” “The Revolution of Heaven,” “Constrained Intentions,” “Cultivating the Nature,” “Autumn Floods,” and “Supreme Happiness.”

Volume Four contains the Outer Chapters “Understanding Life,” “The Mountain Tree,” “Tian Zifang,” and “Knowing the Northward Journey,” and the Miscellaneous Chapters “Gengsang Chu,” “Xu Wugui,” and “Zeyang.”

Volume Five contains the Miscellaneous Chapters “External Things,” “Parables,” “Yielding the Throne,” “Robber Zhi,” “Discussing the Sword,” “The Old Fisherman,” “Lie Yukou,” and “The World.”

In the original table of contents, “External Things,” “Parables,” “Yielding the Throne,” “Robber Zhi,” and “Discussing the Sword” were listed twice, and the numbers beside the chapter titles were also incorrect. The chapters have been arranged here according to the continuous numbering in the later entries.

庄子,宋人也,名周,字休。生睢阳蒙县。尝为蒙漆园吏。学无所不窥,要本归於老子之言,故其着书十余万言,大抵率寓言也。.其言洸洋自恣以适己,故自王公大人不能器之。楚威王闻周贤,使使厚币迎之,许以为相。周笑谓使者:千金,重利;卿相,尊位也。子独不见郊祭之牺牛乎?养食之数岁,衣以文绣,以入太庙。当是之时,欲为孤豚,其可得乎?子亟去,无污我。我宁游戏污演之中自快,无为有国者所羁,终身不仕,以快吾志焉。唐封南华真人,书为《南华真经》。 内篇逍遥游第一
Interpretation

Zhuangzi was a native of the state of Song. His name was Zhou, and his courtesy name was Xiu. He was born in Meng County, in Suiyang, and once held a minor post overseeing the lacquer garden there. He studied widely and had scarcely any field he had not explored, yet his thought ultimately returned to Laozi. Zhuangzi wrote more than a hundred thousand words, most of them expressed through parables.

His words flowed freely and expansively, arising as he pleased to express his own aspirations. For this reason, even princes and nobles could not regard him as a talent to be put to their service. When King Wei of Chu heard that Zhuangzi was a worthy man, he sent envoys bearing generous gifts to invite him, promising to appoint him prime minister of Chu.

Zhuangzi smiled and said to the envoys, “A thousand pieces of gold are a weighty fortune, and a high ministerial post is a position of honor. Have you never seen the ox used in the suburban sacrifice? It is fed for several years, dressed in splendid embroidered robes, and led into the Grand Ancestral Temple for the sacrifice. By then, even if it wanted to become a little pig, it would probably be too late. Leave at once, and do not defile me. I would rather roam freely in the mud and live happily than be bound by those who rule the state. I would rather never hold office throughout my life, so that my heart and aspirations may remain unrestrained.”

During the Tang dynasty, Zhuangzi was posthumously honored as the “Perfected One of Nanhua,” and his writings were given the title The True Classic of Nanhua.

The first of the Inner Chapters: “Free and Easy Wandering.”

“There is a northern sea…” (In the sea to the north there is…)

北冥有者所羁,终身不仕,以快吾志焉。唐封南华真人,书为《南华真经》。 内篇逍遥游第一 北冥有鱼,其名为鲲。鲲之大,不知其几千里也;化而为鸟,其名为鹏。鹏之背,不知其几千里也;怒而飞,其翼若垂天之云。是鸟也,海运则将徙於南冥。南冥者,天池也。齐谐者,志怪者也。谐之言曰:鹏之徙於南冥也,水击三千里,搏扶摇而上者九万里,去以六月息者也。野马也,尘埃也,生物之以息相吹也。天之苍苍,其正色邪?其远而无所至极邪?其视下也,亦若是则已矣。且夫水之积也不厚,则其负大舟也无力。覆杯水於助堂之上,则芥为之舟;置杯焉则胶,水浅而舟大也。风之积也不厚,则其负大翼也无力。故九万里则风斯在下矣,而后乃今培风,背负青天而莫之夭关者,而后舟;置杯焉则胶,水浅而舟大也。风之积也不厚,则其负大翼也无力。故九万里则风斯在下矣,而后乃今培风,背负青天而莫之夭关者,而后乃今将图南。蜩与鸾鸠笑之曰:我决起而飞,枪榆枋,时则不至,而控於地而已矣;奚以之九万里而南为?适莽苍者,三准而反,腹犹果然;适百里者,宿春粮;适千里者,三月聚粮。之二虫又何知?小知不及大知,小年不及大年。奚以知其然也?朝菌不知晦朔,媳蛄不知春秋,此小年也。楚之南有冥灵者,以五百岁为春,五百岁为秋;上古有大桩者,以八千岁为春,八千岁为秋。
Interpretation

In the northern depths of the sea there is a fish called Kun. No one knows how many thousands of miles long it is. It transforms into a bird called Peng. No one knows how many thousands of miles wide Peng’s back is. When it rises into flight, its wings are like clouds hanging from the edge of the sky. Taking advantage of a great wind over the sea, the bird is about to migrate to the southern depths of the sea. The southern depths of the sea are the Heavenly Pool.

The Qixie (a book recording strange and wondrous things) says: When Peng migrates south, its wings beat against the water, raising waves three thousand miles high. It rides a whirlwind, spiraling upward to a height of ninety thousand miles, and departs on the great wind of the sixth month. The floating haze and dust near the ground are formed as the breath exhaled by all kinds of creatures stirs and blows against itself. Is the sky’s deep blue its true color? Or does it look that way because it stretches so far without end? When Peng looks down from above, perhaps it sees much the same.

If water does not gather to sufficient depth, it cannot support a great ship. Pour a cup of water onto the floor of a hall, and a blade of grass can serve as a boat; set a cup there, and it sticks to the ground, because the water is too shallow and the boat too large. If wind does not gather to sufficient strength, it cannot bear enormous wings. So when Peng rises to a height of ninety thousand miles, the wind is beneath it. Only then can it rely on the wind, with the blue sky at its back and nothing to obstruct it, and begin its journey south.

The cicada and the little dove laugh at Peng, saying, “We spring into the air and stop at an elm or a sandalwood tree. Sometimes we don’t make it that far and simply fall back to the ground. Why would anyone need to fly ninety thousand miles and head south?” A person traveling to the nearby countryside takes enough food for three meals, returns the same day, and is still full. Someone traveling a hundred miles must pound grain and prepare provisions the night before. Someone traveling a thousand miles must store food three months in advance. What could these two little creatures possibly understand?

Small understanding cannot compare with great understanding; a short life cannot compare with a long one. How do we know this? The mushroom that lives from dawn to dusk knows nothing of the beginning and end of a month. The cicada knows nothing of spring and autumn in a year. These are examples of short lives. In the southern state of Chu, there was a great tree called Mingling, for which five hundred years made a spring and five hundred years made an autumn. In ancient times, there was a tree called Dacun, for which eight thousand years made a spring and eight thousand years made an autumn.

而彭祖乃今以久持闻,众人匹之,不亦悲乎。汤之问棘也是已:穷发之北有冥海者,天池也。有鱼焉,其广数千里,未有知其修者,彭祖乃今以久持闻,众人匹之,不亦悲乎。汤之问棘也是已:穷发之北有冥海者,天池也。有鱼焉,其广数千里,未有知其修者,其名为鲲。有鸟焉,其名为鹏,背若太山,翼若垂天之云;搏扶摇、羊角而上者九万里,绝云气,负青天,然后图南,且适南淇也。斥鸦笑之曰:彼且奚适也?我腾跃而上,不过数仞而下,翱翔蓬蒿之问,此亦飞之至也。而彼且奚适?也此小大之辩也。故夫知效一官、行比一乡、德合一君、而征一国者,其自视也亦若此矣。而宋荣子犹然笑之。且举世而誉之而不加劝,举世而非之而不加沮,定乎内外之分,辩乎荣辱之境,斯已矣。彼其於世,未数数然也。虽然,犹有未树也。夫列子御风而行,泠然善也,旬有五.日而后反。彼於致福者,未数数然也。虽然,犹有未树也。夫列子御风而行,泠然善也,旬有五.日而后反。彼於致福者,未数数然也。此虽免乎行,有所待者也。若夫乘天地之正,而御六气之辩,以游无穷者,彼且恶乎待哉?故曰:至人无己,神人无功,圣人无名。尧让天下於许由,曰:日月出矣,而娇火不息;其於光也,不亦难乎?
Interpretation

Pengzu was renowned throughout the world for his long life, and people compared themselves with him. Is that not rather sad? When Tang of Shang questioned Ji, he spoke of the same principle: at the barren edge of the north, where no plants grow, there is a vast, deep sea called the “Celestial Pool.” In it lives a fish thousands of miles across; no one knows how long it is. Its name is Kun. There is also a bird named Peng, whose back is like a mountain and whose wings are like clouds covering the sky. Riding a whirlwind, it spirals upward to a height of ninety thousand miles, passes through the clouds, bears the blue sky on its back, and then flies south, preparing to travel to the waters of the south.

The birds in the small marsh mocked the Peng, saying, “Where does it think it’s going? I leap into the air, fly a few yards at most, then come back down. I circle among the weeds, and that already counts as flying high. Where does it think it’s going?” This is the difference between the small and the great. Those whose intelligence suits them to serve in a single office, whose conduct can influence a single village, whose virtue wins the approval of one ruler, or whose abilities earn the trust of one state regard themselves just as the small birds regard themselves.

Song Rongzi, however, saw things differently. If everyone in the world praised him, he would not become more zealous; if everyone in the world criticized him, he would not become discouraged. He could distinguish himself from external things and see the difference between honor and disgrace. That was all. He did not eagerly pursue worldly affairs, but there were still heights he had not reached.

Liezi rode the wind, light and carefree, and returned after fifteen days. He was not eager to seek good fortune, but there were still heights he had not attained. Though he did not have to walk, he still depended on the wind. As for one who follows the constant ways of Heaven and Earth, rides the changes of the six energies—Yin, Yang, wind, rain, darkness, and brightness—and wanders through the boundless realm, what would such a person still need to depend on? Hence the saying: “The Perfected Person has no self; the spiritual person achieves no merit; the sage seeks no fame.” That is, one who reaches the highest state does not cling to the self, the wondrous person takes no credit, and the wise person seeks no reputation.

When Yao offered the world to Xu You, he said, “The sun and moon have already risen, yet the torch is not extinguished. Is it not difficult for its light to rival that of the sun and moon?”

时雨降矣,而犹浸灌;其於泽也,不亦劳乎?夫子立而天下治,而我犹尸之;吾自视缺然,请致天下。许由曰:子治天下,天下既已治也;而我犹代子,吾将为名乎?名者,实之宾也;吾将为宾乎?鹤鹧巢於深林,不过一枝;偃鼠饮河,不过满腹。归休乎君,予无所用天下为。庖人虽不治庖,尸祝不越樽俎而代之矣。肩吾问於连叔曰:吾闻言於接舆,大而无当,往而不反。吾惊怖其言。犹河汉而无下为。庖人虽不治庖,尸祝不越樽俎而代之矣。肩吾问於连叔曰:吾闻言於接舆,大而无当,往而不反。吾惊怖其言。犹河汉而无极也;大有径庭,不近人情焉。连叔曰:其言谓何哉?曰:藐姑射之山,有神人居焉。肌肤若冰雪,绰1约若处子,不食五谷,吸风饮露,乘云气,御飞龙,而游乎四海之外;其神凝,使物不疵疠而年谷熟。吾以是狂而不信也。连叔曰:然。瞽者无以与乎文章之观,聋者无以与乎钟鼓之声。岂唯形骸有聋盲哉?夫知亦有之。是其言也犹时女也。之人也,之德也,将旁碑万物以为一,世薪乎乱,孰弊弊焉以天下为事。之人也,物莫之伤:大浸稽天而不溺,大旱金石流,土山焦而不热。是其尘垢枇糠将犹陶铸尧、舜者也,孰肯以物为事?宋人资章甫而适诸越,越人断发文身,无所用之。
Interpretation

“Timely rain” has already fallen, yet it keeps pouring down. Wouldn’t that be needless work for the fields? You have brought peace to all under Heaven, while I still occupy this position. I feel unequal to the task, so please let me hand the world over to you.

Xu You said, “You govern the world, and the world is already at peace. If I were to replace you, would I be doing so to seek a reputation? Reputation is merely an appendage to actual achievement. Why should I become an appendage to reputation? A wren nesting in a deep forest needs only one branch; a mole drinking at a river needs only enough to fill its belly. Go back and rest. The world is of no use to me. Even if a cook does not prepare the meal, the ritual officiant will not step over the wine vessels and offerings to cook in his place.”

Shenwu asked Lianshu, “I once heard Jieyu speak. His words were grand but impractical, and they wandered far without ever returning. I was astonished by what I heard. His words were as vast and boundless as the Milky Way, far removed from ordinary sense and human experience.”

Lianshu asked, “What did he say?”

Shenwu replied, “He said that on the distant Mount Gushe lives a spirit-like person. His skin is like ice and snow, and his bearing is graceful as a young woman’s. He eats no grains, but breathes the wind and drinks the dew. Riding the clouds and harnessing flying dragons, he roams beyond the four seas. His spirit is concentrated and still; he can keep all things free from illness and disaster and make the crops flourish. I find this too absurd to believe.”

Lianshu said, “Of course. A blind person cannot appreciate colors and patterns; a deaf person cannot hear the sound of bells and drums. Is deafness and blindness confined to the body? A person’s understanding, too, can have its limits. What you heard is just the sort of thing that would be said to someone like you.

“A person like this, with this kind of De (Virtue/Power), can bring all things together and see them as one. Though living amid a chaotic world, he is not troubled or worn down by it. How could he busy himself treating the world as his own concern? Nothing can harm him. Even if floods fill the sky, he will not drown; even if a scorching drought melts metal and stone and leaves the mountains and earth parched, he will not feel the heat. Even the dust and dregs of his body would be enough to shape people like Yao and Shun. Why would he be willing to make external things his concern?”

People from the state of Song took ceremonial caps, called zhangfu, to sell in Yue. But the people of Yue wore their hair short and tattooed their bodies, so they had no use for such caps.

尧治天下之民,平海内之政,往见尧、舜者也,孰肯以物为事?宋人资章甫而适诸越,越人断发文身,无所用之。尧治天下之民,平海内之政,往见四子藐姑射之山,汾水之阳,官然丧其天下焉。惠子谓庄子曰:魏王贻我大瓠之种,我树之成,而实五石。以盛水浆,其坚不能自举也。剖之以为瓢,则瓠落无所容。非不旸然大也,吾为其无用而拾之。庄子曰:夫子固拙於用大矣。宋人有善为不龟手之药者,世世以拼僻统为事。客闻之,请买其方百金。聚族而谋曰:我世世为拼僻统,不过数金,今一朝而斋技百金,请与之。客得之,以说昊王。越有难,昊王使之将,冬与越人水战,大败越人,裂地而封之。能不龟手一也,或以封,或不免於拼僻统,则,昊王使之将,冬与越人水战,大败越人,裂地而封之。能不龟手一也,或以封,或不免於拼僻统,则所用之异也。今子有五石之瓠,何不虑以为大樽,而浮乎江湖,而忧其瓠落无所容?则夫子犹有蓬之心也夫。惠子谓庄子曰:吾有大树,人谓之楼。其大本拥肿而不中绳墨,其小枝卷曲而不中规矩,立之涂,匠者不顾。今子之言大而无用,众所同去也。庄子曰:子独不见狸狂乎?卑身而伏,以候敖者;束西跳梁,不避高下;中於机辟,死於罔罟。今夫厘牛,其大若垂天之云。
Interpretation

When Yao was governing the people and bringing order to the affairs of the realm, he once went to visit sages such as Yao and Shun. Who would regard external things as something worth worrying about? A man from Song went to Yue to sell ceremonial caps. The people of Yue cut their hair short and tattooed their bodies, so they had no use for caps at all.

After Yao had governed the realm and brought peace to the four seas, he traveled to the southern slope of Mount Miaogushe, the immortal mountain said to be home to divine beings, and visited four Perfected Ones. On his return, it was as if he had forgotten the whole world.

Huizi said to Zhuangzi, “The King of Wei gave me seeds of a huge gourd. I planted them, and the gourds that grew were as large as five shi. If I used one to hold water or a drink, it was too fragile to bear the weight. If I cut it open to make a dipper, it was too big to hold anything. It wasn’t that it wasn’t large enough; I simply thought it was useless, so I smashed it.”

Zhuangzi said, “You really don’t know how to use large things. There was a man in Song who had made his living for generations washing silk floss. His hands were always soaked, so he was skilled at making a salve that kept the skin from cracking in the cold. A visitor heard of it and offered a hundred gold pieces for the formula. The man’s family discussed it together: ‘For generations we have washed silk floss, earning no more than a few gold pieces. Now we can sell the formula for a hundred gold pieces all at once. We should sell it to him.’ The visitor obtained the formula and used it to persuade the King of Wu. When Yue sent troops to invade, the King of Wu put him in command of the army. In winter, he fought Yue’s forces on the water and routed them. The king then rewarded him with land. The salve for preventing cracked hands was the same, but one man received a fief because of it, while another used it only to wash silk floss. The difference lay in how it was used. Now you have a gourd as large as five shi. Why not tie it around yourself as a float and drift across rivers and lakes, instead of worrying that it is too big to contain anything? It seems your mind is still clogged with weeds.”

Huizi said to Zhuangzi, “I have a large tree that people call a ch’u tree. Its trunk is knotted and lumpy, so it does not meet the straight lines set by the carpenter’s ink line. Its branches twist and bend, so they do not conform to the compass or square. It grows beside the road, but carpenters don’t even look at it. Now your words are just as large and useless, so everyone will reject them too.”

Zhuangzi said, “Haven’t you seen wildcats and weasels? They crouch low, waiting for small animals to come out of their burrows to feed. They dart back and forth, leaping high and low, yet they fall into traps and die in nets. As for the yak, its body is as huge as a cloud hanging at the edge of the sky…”

此能为大矣,而不能执鼠。今子有大树,患其无用,何不树之於无何有之乡,广漠之野,彷徨乎无为其侧,逍遥乎寝卧其下。不夫2斤斧,其无用,何不树之於无何有之乡,广漠之野,彷徨乎无为其侧,逍遥乎寝卧其下。不夫2斤斧,物无害者,无所可用。安所困苦哉。 1绰:世德本作『潭』。 2夫:世德本作『夭』。 内篇齐物论第二
Interpretation

Although it is enormous, it cannot even catch a mouse. You have a great tree and worry that it is useless. Why not plant it in a place where there is nothing, in a vast, open field? You could stroll leisurely beside it and lie beneath it as you please. It will not be felled by an axe or harmed by anything else. Since it offers no use, what is there to trouble you?

Note: In the original text, some editions read “yao” instead of “fu.”

南郭子蓦隐几而坐,仰天而嘘,嗜焉似丧其耦。颜成子游立侍乎前,曰:何居乎?形固可使如槁木,而心固可使如死灰乎?今之隐几者,非昔之隐几者也。子綦曰:偃,不亦善乎;而问之也?今者吾丧我,汝知之乎?汝闻人籁,而未闻地籁,汝闻地籁而未闻天籁。夫子游曰:敢问其方。子綦曰:夫大块噫气,其偃,不亦善乎;而问之也?今者吾丧我,汝知之乎?汝闻人籁,而未闻地籁,汝闻地籁而未闻天籁。夫子游曰:敢问其方。子綦曰:夫大块噫气,其名为风,是唯无作,作则万窍怒旸,而独不闻之参参乎?山林之畏佳。大木百围之窍穴,似鼻,似口,似耳,似析,似圈,似臼,似佳者,似污者。激者,謞者,叱者,吸者,叫者,号者,宎者,咬者,前者唱于而随者唱喁。冷风则小和,飘风则大和。厉风济则众窍为虚。而独不见之调调之刁刁乎?子游曰:地籁则众窍是已,人籁则比竹是已,敢问天籁。子綦曰:夫吹万不同,而使其自己也,咸其自取,怒者其谁济则众窍为虚。而独不见之调调之刁刁乎?子游曰:地籁则众窍是已,人籁则比竹是已,敢问天籁。子綦曰:夫吹万不同,而使其自己也,咸其自取,怒者其谁邪?大知闲闲,小知间间;大言炎炎,小言詹詹。其寐也魂交,其觉也形开;
Interpretation

Nan Guo Ziqi, a figure in a Zhuangzi parable, sat leaning against a small table, slowly exhaling with his head tilted back. His expression was distant, as if he had lost the other half of himself. Yan Cheng Ziyou stood before him in attendance and asked, “What is happening? Can a person’s body really become like a withered tree, and the heart really become like dead ashes? The man leaning against the table now is no longer the person you used to be.”

Ziqi said, “Yan, that is a good question. I have now forgotten myself. Do you understand? You have heard the sounds made by humans, but not the sounds made by the Earth. You have heard the sounds made by the Earth, but not the sounds of Heaven.”

Ziyou said, “May I ask what you mean?”

Ziqi said, “The breath the Earth sends forth is called wind. When the wind does not blow, there is no sound. But when it rises, the myriad openings roar fiercely. Have you never heard the wind howl through the mountains and forests? On the great trees, some openings are like noses, some like mouths, some like ears, some like the holes in wooden instruments, and others like rings, mortars, or hollows. As the wind passes through them, they make all kinds of sounds: quick and sharp, bellowing, gasping, crying out, and wailing. Some sound first, and others answer. A gentle breeze brings soft, mild sounds; a strong wind makes them loud and thunderous. When the gale dies down, all the openings fall silent again. Have you never seen the branches sway gently and the plants bend with the wind?”

Ziyou said, “The sounds of the Earth are the sounds made by all these openings; the sounds made by humans are the bamboo pipes arranged in a row. May I ask what the sounds of Heaven are?”

Ziqi said, “The wind passes through all things, and each makes a different sound, each giving voice in its own way. Their sounds arise from their own forms and conditions. So what is the force that makes all things sound?”

The great wise person is broad-minded; the small-minded person is always calculating. Grand words carry great force; petty words go on and on. When people sleep, their souls mingle and move about; when they wake, their bodies begin to act.

与接为构,日以心斗,缦者,窖者,密者,小恐惴惴,大恐缦缦。其发若机括,其司是非之谓也;其留如诅盟,其守胜之谓也。其杀如秋冬,以言其日消也;其溺之所为之,不可使复之也;其厌也如缄,以言其老洫也;近死之心,莫使复阳,其守胜之谓也。其杀如秋冬,以言其日消也;其溺之所为之,不可使复之也;其厌也如缄,以言其老洫也;近死之心,莫使复阳也。喜怒哀乐,虑叹变愁,姚佚启态。乐出虚,蒸成菌。日夜相代乎前,而莫知其所萌。已乎,已乎。日一暮得此,其所由以生乎。非彼无我,非我无所取。是亦近矣,而不知其所为使。若有真宰,而特不得其朕,可行己信,而不见其形,有情而无形。百骸、九窍、六脏,赅而存焉,吾谁与为亲?汝皆悦之乎?其有私焉?如是皆有为臣妾乎?其臣妾不足以相治乎?其递相为君臣乎?其有真君存焉?如求得其情与不得,无益损乎其真。一受其成形,不亡以待尽。与物相刃相靡,非行尽如驰,而莫之能止,不亦悲乎。终身役役而不见其成功,茶然疲役而不知其所归,可不物相刃相靡,非行尽如驰,而莫之能止,不亦悲乎。终身役役而不见其成功,茶然疲役而不知其所归,可不哀邪。人谓之不死,奚益。其形化,其心与之然,可不谓大哀乎?
Interpretation

Whenever an external thing appears, the mind becomes entangled with it, struggling day after day without rest. When the mind is scattered, it grows hazy and confused; when it burrows deep within, it becomes stifled and blocked; when it shuts itself tight, it turns cautious and timid. A small fear makes one uneasy and apprehensive, while a great fear leaves one bewildered and helpless. When thoughts spring into action, they are as quick as a crossbow trigger, and one is forever judging right and wrong. When thoughts come to a standstill, they become as stubborn as an oath, because one is always trying to secure victory and avoid defeat. The mind’s energy gradually declines, like all things withering in autumn and winter: it is being spent day by day. When one becomes absorbed in what one is doing, one cannot turn back; the mind grows sealed shut, as if bound with a cord—this is its gradual aging and exhaustion. The mind comes close to death and can no longer regain its vitality. This, too, is the result of insisting on winning.

Joy, anger, sorrow, pleasure, thought, sighing, change, anxiety, along with frivolity, abandon, and affected airs: these emotions and expressions are like music arising from emptiness, or like ground vapors that rise and produce fungi. They appear before us in turn, day and night, yet no one knows where they first emerge.

Enough, enough! People experience all this every day, but what makes it happen? Without external things, there would be no self; without the self, there would be no way to feel external things. This comes close to an answer, yet we still do not know what, behind it all, directs them.

It seems there is a true master, yet we can find no trace of it. It sets life in motion and gives a person’s mind its convictions, yet its form cannot be seen: its effects are real, but it has no shape. We possess all our hundred bones, nine apertures—the nine sensory openings—and six viscera, a collective term for the internal organs. Which of them should I hold dear? Are they all worthy of affection, or do I favor one among them? Are they all ruled like servants and consorts? If they cannot govern one another, do they take turns being ruler and subject? Or is there some other true master? Whether we discover its reality or fail to do so, nothing is added to or taken from it.

Once people receive a bodily form, they can only keep it until life is spent. People and external things collide and wear each other down, rushing forward like galloping horses with nothing to make them stop. Is this not lamentable? To be busy all one’s life and see no achievement; to labor until utterly exhausted without knowing where one is headed—is this not sorrowful? People say such a person is still alive, but what good is being alive? When the body declines and the mind sinks along with it, is this not a profound grief?

人之生也,固若是芒乎?其我独芒,而人亦有不芒者乎?夫随其成心而师之,谁独且无师乎?奚必知代而心自取者有之?愚者与有焉。未成乎心而有是非,是今日适越而昔至也。是以无有为有。无有为有,虽有神禹且不能知,吾独且奈何哉。夫言非吹也。言者有言,其所言者持未定也。果有言邪?其未尝有言邪?其以为异於音?亦有辩乎?其无辩乎?道恶乎隐而有真伪?言恶乎隐而有是非?道恶乎往而不存?言恶乎存而不其以为异於音?亦有辩乎?其无辩乎?道恶乎隐而有真伪?言恶乎隐而有是非?道恶乎往而不存?言恶乎存而不可?道隐於小成,言隐於荣华。故有儒墨之是非,以是其所非而非其所是。欲是其所非而非其所是,则莫若以明。物无非彼,物无非是。自彼则不见,自知则知之。故曰:彼出於是,是亦因彼。彼是,方生之说也。虽然,方生方死,方死方生;方可方不可,方不可方可;因是因非,因非因是。是以圣人不由而照之于天,亦因是也。是亦彼也,彼亦是也。彼亦一是非,此亦一是非。果且有彼是乎哉?果且无彼是乎哉?彼是莫得其偶以圣人不由而照之于天,亦因是也。是亦彼也,彼亦是也。彼亦一是非,此亦一是非。果且有彼是乎哉?果且无彼是乎哉?彼是莫得其偶,谓之道枢。
Interpretation

Does human life naturally remain in a state of bewilderment like this? Am I the only one who is bewildered, or are there times when others are not? If people follow the inclinations they have already formed and take them as their teachers, who can be without a teacher of their own? Why insist that only someone who understands the changes in things and can judge for themselves counts as having a teacher? Even a foolish person has a teacher of their own. Before an inclination has even formed, someone has already decided what is right and what is wrong. It is like setting out for Yue today and claiming to have arrived yesterday. This is treating what does not exist as though it did. Even the divine Yu—the legendary sage king who controlled the floods—could not make sense of treating what does not exist as real. What can I do?

Words are not merely sounds produced as wind blows. A speaker expresses something, but the meaning expressed may not remain fixed. Does this count as speaking, or has there never been any real speaking at all? How do words differ from sounds? Is there truly a distinction between them, or is there none? Why is the Dao, the foundation that all things follow, obscured so that distinctions between true and false arise? Why are words obscured so that disputes over right and wrong arise? Where could the Dao be absent? And where could words be beyond question?

The Dao is obscured by partial views, and words by ornate rhetoric. Thus the Confucians and Mohists argue with each other over what is right and wrong: they call what they oppose wrong, and what they approve right. To judge such disputes, it is better to look with clear sight. All things can be viewed from “that” (the other side, the other person), and all can be viewed from “this” (oneself, this side). From the standpoint of the other, one cannot see the reasoning of one’s own side; from one’s own standpoint, one can understand what one sees. Thus “that” arises from “this,” and “this” depends on “that” to take shape. That and this form each other.

Yet as soon as something appears, it also moves toward disappearance; once it disappears, it may in turn appear. To judge something possible is also to have what is impossible; to judge something impossible is also to have what is possible. Right and wrong depend on each other and transform into each other. So the sage does not cling to a single standpoint, but looks upon things from the wholeness of nature; even this means following the way things are in themselves. This is also that, and that is also this. That has its own rights and wrongs, and this has its own rights and wrongs. Is there truly a distinction between this and that, or is there no such distinction at all? When this and that can no longer be set against one another, with neither having an opposite, this is called the “pivot of the Dao” (the Dao’s central hinge).

枢始得其环中,以应无穷。是亦一无穷,非亦一无穷也。故曰:莫若以明。以指喻指之非指,不若以非指喻指之非指也;以马喻马之非马,不若以非马喻马之非马也。天地一指也,万物一马也。可乎可,不可乎不可。道行之而成,物谓之而然。恶乎然?然於然?恶乎不然?不然於不然。物固有所然,物固有所可;无物不然,无物不可。故为是举蓬与楹、厉与西施、恢愧橘怪,道通为一。其分也,成也;其成也,毁也。凡物无成与毁,复通为一。唯达者知通为一,为是不用而寓诸庸。庸也者,用也;用也者,通也;通也者,得也,适得而几矣。因是已,已而不知其然,谓之道。劳神明为一而不知,为是不用而寓诸庸。庸也者,用也;用也者,通也;通也者,得也,适得而几矣。因是已,已而不知其然,谓之道。劳神明为一而不知其同也,谓之朝三。何谓朝三?曰:狙公赋芋曰:朝三而暮四。众狙皆怒。曰:然则朝四而暮三。众狙皆悦。名实未亏而喜怒为用,亦因是也。是以圣人和之以是非而休乎天均,是之谓两行。古之人,其知有所至矣。恶□乎至?有以为未始有物者,至矣,尽矣,不可以加矣。其次以为有物矣,而未始有封也。其次以为有封焉,而未始有是非也。是非之彰也,道之所以亏也。
Interpretation

The key is to grasp the pivot on which things change. Only by standing at the center of the circle can one respond to endless transformations. Affirmation is endless, and negation is endless too, so it is better to view all things through clear and penetrating understanding.

To explain that a finger is not a finger by using a finger is less effective than using something that is not a finger; likewise, to explain that a horse is not a horse by using a horse is less effective than using something that is not a horse. Heaven and Earth may be regarded as a single finger, and the myriad things as a single horse. Anything can be affirmed, and anything can also be denied. Paths are made by people walking them; things are recognized as such after people name them. Why do we say that something is so? Because people take it to be so. Why do we say it is not so? Because people take it not to be so. Each thing has aspects that are regarded as right and aspects that are regarded as worthwhile. There is nothing that cannot be called “so,” and nothing that cannot be called “acceptable.”

Thus Zhuangzi places mugwort and great pillars side by side, along with the ugly Li and the beautiful Xishi, as well as all manner of strange and unusual things. He shows that, viewed from the Dao, they are connected and form a single whole. Once things are distinguished, they take shape; once they take shape, they begin to move toward decay. Yet because nothing among the myriad things has an absolute beginning or end, they can still be joined again as one. Only those who understand this see that all things are interconnected. They do not force things into action, but dwell in the practical workings of everyday life. “Ordinary” means everyday use. Use brings things into connection, and connection brings gain. When one reaches this point, one is close to the Dao. To follow this principle without asking why things are as they are—that is the Dao.

If we strain to force the myriad things into one, without understanding that they are already alike, we are like the “three in the morning” story. What does “three in the morning” mean? A monkey keeper gave acorns to his monkeys, saying they would get three in the morning and four in the evening. The monkeys were all angry. He then said they would get four in the morning and three in the evening, and they were all pleased. The total number of acorns had not changed, yet the monkeys’ joy and anger were swayed by how the offer was presented. People, too, are often influenced by names and opinions in just this way.

So the sage harmonizes competing claims about right and wrong and rests in the natural balance. This is called “walking two paths”: following the different standpoints of things and allowing each to proceed in its own way. The ancients once attained an exceptionally high understanding of the Dao. The highest understanding held that at the beginning there were no things at all. The next held that things existed, but had not yet been divided into distinct categories. The next held that distinctions existed, but right and wrong had not yet been separated. Once right and wrong became clearly defined, the Dao was diminished.

道之所以亏,爱之所以成。果且有成与亏乎哉.?果且无成与亏乎哉?有成与亏,故昭氏之鼓琴也。无成与亏,故昭氏之不鼓琴也。昭文之鼓琴也,师旷之枝策也,惠子之据梧也,三子之知几乎。皆其盛者也,故载之末年。唯其好之也,以异於彼;其好之也,欲以明之。彼非所明□惠子之据梧也,三子之知几乎。皆其盛者也,故载之末年。唯其好之也,以异於彼;其好之也,欲以明之。彼非所明□而明之,故以坚白之昧终。而其子又以文之纶终,终身无成。若是而可谓成乎?虽我亦成也。若是而不可谓成乎?物与我无成也。是故滑疑之耀,圣人之所图也。为是不用而寓诸庸,此之谓以明。今且有言於此,不知其与是类乎?其与是不类乎,类与不类,相与为类,则与彼无以异矣。虽然,请尝言之。有始也者,有未始有始也者,有未始有夫未始有始也者。有有也者,有无也者,有未始有无也者,有未始有大未始有无也者。俄而有无矣,而未知有无之果孰有孰无也。今我则已有谓矣,而未知吾所谓之其果有谓乎,其果无谓乎?天下莫大於秋毫之末,而太山为孰有孰无也。今我则已有谓矣,而未知吾所谓之其果有谓乎,其果无谓乎?天下莫大於秋毫之末,而太山为小;莫寿乎殇子,而彭祖为夭。
Interpretation

Dao seems to suffer a loss because people’s preferences make it seem to achieve something. Are there really achievement and loss? Or are there really neither achievement nor loss? Because he believed in achievement and loss, Zhaowen played the zither. Because he believed there was neither achievement nor loss, Zhaowen could also choose not to play.

Zhaowen played the zither, Shi Kuang waved his conducting stick—the tool ancient musicians used to keep the beat—and Huizi leaned against a parasol tree and debated. All three were highly intelligent and skilled in their own arts. Their abilities were outstanding, and they immersed themselves in them throughout their lives. They favored their own skills and wanted to use them to set themselves apart from others. Out of love for those skills, they also wanted to explain their principles clearly. Yet these were things that could not be fully explained. Huizi eventually became absorbed in the debate over “hardness and whiteness”—whether qualities such as hardness and whiteness could be separated—and ended in confusion. Zhaowen’s son practiced his father’s zither art all his life, but never mastered it. Can this be called achievement? If so, then I too have achieved something. If not, then neither the myriad things nor I have achieved anything.

What the sage seeks, then, is a kind of brightness that is hard to distinguish and ever changing. He does not cling to deliberate action, but entrusts his mind to ordinary things. This is called “illumination.” I have said these things, but I do not know whether they accord with this principle—or whether they do not. If we place accord and failure to accord in the same category, then my words are no different from any others.

Even so, I will try to speak: there is a beginning, and there is a time before there had ever been a beginning; and there is a time before there had ever been a time before there was a beginning. There is “being,” there is “nonbeing,” and there is a time before there had ever been nonbeing; and there is a time before there had ever been a time before there was nonbeing. Suddenly, “being” and “nonbeing” appeared, but we still do not know which is truly being and which is truly nonbeing. Now that I have said these things, I do not know whether what I have said counts as saying something, or whether I have said nothing at all.

There is nothing in the world larger than the tip of an autumn hair, while Mount Tai seems small by comparison. No one lives longer than a child who dies young, while Peng Zu seems short lived.

天地与我并生,而万物与我为一。既已为一矣,且得有言乎?既已谓之一矣,且得无言乎?一与言为二,二与一为三。自此以往,巧历不能得,而况其凡乎。故自无适有以至於三,而况自有适有乎。无适焉,因是已。夫道未始有封,言未始有常,为是而有有吵也。请言其吵:有左有右,有伦有义,有分有辩,有竞有争,此之谓八德,六合之外,圣人存而不论;六合之内,圣人论而不议。春秋经世先王之志,圣人议而不辩。故分也者,有不分也;辩也者,有不辩也。曰:何也?圣人怀之,众人辩之以相示也。不议。春秋经世先王之志,圣人议而不辩。故分也者,有不分也;辩也者,有不辩也。曰:何也?圣人怀之,众人辩之以相示也。故曰辩也者有不见也。夫大道不称,大辩不言,大仁不仁,大廉不赚,大勇不恢。道照而不道,言辩而不及,仁常而不成,廉清而不信,勇技而不成。五者园而几向方矣。故知止其所不知,至矣。孰知不言之辩、不道之道?夕若有能知,此之谓天府。注焉而不满,酌焉而不竭,而不知其所由来,此之谓葆光。故昔者尧问於舜曰:我欲伐宗、脍、胥放,南面而不释然,其故何也?
Interpretation

Heaven and earth came into being alongside me, and the myriad things are one with me in a seamless whole. Since we are already one, what more can be said? Yet once we have said “one,” how can that statement itself not count as speech? “Oneness” and “speaking of oneness” together make two; add the original “one,” and we have three. From this point on, even the most skilled calculator could not count them all—how much less an ordinary person. So moving from “nothing” to “something” is already this complicated by the time we reach three. How much more complicated must it be to move from one kind of “something” to another? There is no need to reason any further. Let things follow their natural course.

The Dao has no boundaries, and speech has no fixed standards. People set out their various views, and so distinctions and disputes arise. The kinds of dispute include left and right, order and duty, distinguishing and analyzing, competing and contending; these are called the “Eight Virtues.” Matters beyond the four directions of heaven and earth are things the sage keeps in mind but does not discuss. Matters within the four directions of heaven and earth are things the sage may discuss, but does not debate. As for the events of the world recorded in the Spring and Autumn Annals and the intentions of the former kings, the sage comments on them but does not argue.

Thus, there are times when what is called making distinctions means making none, and times when what is called debate means there is no need to debate. Why? The sage keeps the truth within, while ordinary people use debate to show themselves off. That is why argument often makes people lose sight of what is true.

The Great Dao cannot be named in words; the highest form of debate uses no words; true benevolence does not make a show of kindness; true integrity does not boast of its purity; true courage does not flaunt its strength. To make the Dao explicit is to depart from it. However clever one’s words, they cannot express the Dao fully. Benevolence confined to convention cannot be fully realized. Integrity that constantly proclaims its purity cannot win people’s trust. Courage based only on showing off one’s strength cannot amount to true courage. Once these five qualities are pursued deliberately, they can easily stray from what is genuine. So to know where to stop, at the point of what one does not know, is to reach the utmost. Who can understand debate without words and the Dao without speech? Whoever does is said to possess a “Heavenly Treasury”—like a natural storehouse that can hold all things. Pour into it and it will not fill; draw from it and it will not run dry. Yet no one knows where it comes from. This is called “Concealed Light,” a radiance held within and not displayed.

Long ago, Yao asked Shun, “I want to attack the lands of Zong, Kuai, and Xuao. Though I hold the position of ruler, I can never feel at ease. Why is this?” Shun replied, “Those three places…”

舜曰:夫三其所由来,此之谓葆光。故昔者尧问於舜曰:我欲伐宗、脍、胥放,南面而不释然,其故何也?舜曰:夫三子者,犹存乎蓬艾之问。若不释然,何哉?昔者十日并出,万物皆照,而况德之进乎日者乎。啮缺问乎王倪曰:子知物之所同是乎?曰:吾恶乎知之。子知子之所不知邪?曰:吾恶乎知之。然则物无知邪?曰:吾恶乎知之。虽然,尝试言之。庸诅知吾所谓知之非不知邪?庸诅知吾所谓不知之非知邪?且吾尝试问乎汝:民湿寝则腰疾偏死,鳍然乎哉?木处则惴栗徇惧,猥猴然乎哉?三者孰知□正处?民食非知邪?且吾尝试问乎汝:民湿寝则腰疾偏死,鳍然乎哉?木处则惴栗徇惧,猥猴然乎哉?三者孰知□正处?民食刍豢,麋鹿食荐,螂蛆甘带,鸦鸦耆鼠,四者孰知正味?猥编狙以为雌,麋与鹿交,鳝与鱼游。毛婶丽姬,人之所美也,鱼见之深入,乌见之高飞,麋鹿见之央骤。四者孰知天下之正色哉?自我观之,仁义之端,是非之涂,樊然骰乱,吾恶能知其辩。啮缺曰:子不知利害,则至人固不知利害乎?王倪曰:至人神.矣。大泽焚而不能热,河汉仁义之端,是非之涂,樊然骰乱,吾恶能知其辩。啮缺曰:子不知利害,则至人固不知利害乎?王倪曰:至人神.矣。大泽焚而不能热,河汉冱而不能寒,疾雷破山风振海而不能惊。若然者,乘云气,骑日月,而游乎四海之外。死生无变於已,而死利害之端乎。
Interpretation

Shun said, “Those three are still entangled in disputes among reeds and mugwort. Why can’t they let the matter go? In the past, ten suns rose together, illuminating all things. How much brighter, then, is the radiance of Virtue?”

Nie Que asked Wang Ni, “Do you know what all things consider right?”

Wang Ni said, “How would I know?”

Nie Que asked again, “Do you know that you don’t know?”

Wang Ni said, “How would I know?”

Nie Que asked once more, “Then do all things lack understanding?”

Wang Ni said, “How would I know? Still, let me try to explain. How do I know that what I call ‘knowing’ isn’t really ignorance? And how do I know that what I call ‘not knowing’ isn’t really knowledge?

“Let me ask you: when people sleep in damp places, their backs ache and they may even become paralyzed on one side. Is it the same for loaches? When people climb trees, they tremble with fear. Is it the same for apes? Among humans, loaches, and apes, who knows which place is best to live? People eat meat, elk eat grass, centipedes favor snakes, and crows favor mice. Among these creatures, who knows what tastes best?

“Apes mate with baboons; elk mate with deer; eels swim alongside fish. Mao Qiang and Li Ji, legendary beauties of antiquity, are considered beautiful by people. But when fish see them, they dive underwater; when birds see them, they fly high into the sky; and when elk see them, they flee in alarm. Among these creatures, who knows what true beauty under Heaven is? As I see it, the beginnings of benevolence and righteousness, and the boundaries between right and wrong, are tangled and confused. How could I tell them apart?”

Nie Que said, “If you don’t know what is beneficial or harmful, then does the Perfected Person not know either?”

Wang Ni said, “The Perfected Person is beyond comprehension. A great marsh could burn without making him feel hot; the Yellow River and Han River could freeze without making him feel cold. Thunder could split mountains and a gale could churn the sea, yet he would not be alarmed. Such a person rides the clouds, harnesses the sun and moon, and roams beyond the four seas. Neither life nor death can alter his mind—how much less, then, the distinction between benefit and harm?”

瞿鹊子问乎长梧子曰:吾闻诸夫子,圣人不从事於务,不就利,不违害,不喜求,不绿道,无谓有谓,有谓无谓,而游乎尘垢之外。夫子以为孟浪之言,而我以为妙道之行也。吾子以为奚若?长梧子曰:是黄帝之所听莹也。而丘也何足以知之。且汝亦大早计,见卯而求时夜,见弹而求鸦炙。子尝为汝妄言之,汝以妄听之。奚旁日月,挟宇宙?为其胳合,置其滑知之。且汝亦大早计,见卯而求时夜,见弹而求鸦炙。子尝为汝妄言之,汝以妄听之。奚旁日月,挟宇宙?为其胳合,置其滑愍,以隶相尊。众人役,役圣人愚庵,参万岁而一成纯。万物尽然,而以是相蕴。子恶乎知悦生之非惑邪。予恶乎知恶死之非弱丧而不知归者邪。丽之姬,艾封人之子也。晋国之始得之也,涕泣沾襟,及其至於王所,与王同匡林,食刍豢,而后悔其泣也。予恶乎知夫死者不悔其始之薪生乎,梦饮酒者,且而哭泣;梦哭泣者,日一而田猎。方其梦也,不知其梦也。梦之中又占其梦焉,觉而后知其梦也。且有大觉而后知此其大梦也,而愚者自以为觉,窃窃然知之。君乎、牧乎,固哉。丘也与汝,皆梦也;予谓汝梦,亦梦也。是其言也,其名为弟诡。万世之后而一遇大圣,知其解者,是旦暮遇之也丘也与汝,皆梦也;予谓汝梦,亦梦也。
Interpretation

Qu Quezi asked Chang Wuzi, “I heard my teacher say that sages do not devote themselves to worldly affairs, pursue profit, or deliberately avoid misfortune. They do not covet anything, nor do they act against the Dao (the Way). What they say sounds as though they had said nothing, yet their silence seems to say something. They roam at ease beyond the world of dust. My teacher thinks this is absurd, but I find it a subtle truth. What do you think?”

Chang Wuzi said, “Even the Yellow Emperor would be bewildered by these words. How could Confucius fully understand them? You are judging too hastily. Seeing an egg, you expect to hear a rooster crow at dawn; seeing a slingshot, you hope to eat a roast crow at once. I’ll speak to you freely, so listen freely. Why should a sage rely on the sun and moon or take charge of Heaven and Earth? Better to follow the natural mingling and transformation of all things, and let the mind cease to be led about by tangled distinctions. Everyone else rushes about, while the sage appears dull and ignorant. The sage shares the long passage of time with all things, and in the end returns to undivided wholeness. All things change in this way, and in changing they contain one another. How do you know that cherishing life is not a delusion? How do I know that hating death is not like a lost traveler who has forgotten the way home?

“Liji was the daughter of a border official in Ai. When she was first taken to the state of Jin, she wept until her tears soaked her robe. Later, when she came to the ruler of Jin, lived in a splendid palace, and ate rich meats, she regretted having wept. How do I know that the dead do not regret having once been so attached to being alive?

“Those who feast and make merry in a dream may wake to weep; those who weep in a dream may wake and go hunting for pleasure. While dreaming, people do not know they are dreaming, and sometimes even seek to interpret a dream within the dream. Only after waking do they realize it was a dream. Perhaps one must undergo a greater awakening before understanding that everything before us now is itself a great dream. Yet foolish people imagine themselves awake, confidently deciding that they know everything, and even arguing over who is ruler and who is herdsman. How stubborn they are!

“Confucius and you are both in a dream; and when I say that you are dreaming, my words too are dreamlike. Such statements are called ‘paradoxical’—they seem to defy common sense and are hard to grasp. If, after ten thousand generations, we meet a true sage who can understand their meaning, it will be as though we had met between morning and evening.”

Here, “dream” and “waking” show that our judgments about life, death, and reality may not be reliable. The Way of the sage lies in following the transformations of all things without clinging to conventional distinctions between right and wrong.

是其言也,其名为弟诡。万世之后而一遇大圣,知其解者,是旦暮遇之也。既使我与若辩矣,若胜我,我不若胜,若果是也,我果非也邪?我胜若,若不吾胜,我果是也,而果非也邪?其或是也,其或非也邪?其俱是也,其俱非也邪?我与若不能相知也,财人固受其难间,吾谁使正之?使同乎若者正之?既与若同矣,恶能正之。使同乎我者正之?既同乎我矣,恶能正之。使同乎我与若者正之?既异乎我与若矣,恶能正之。使异乎我与若者正之?既同乎我与若矣,恶能正之。然则我与若与人,俱不能相知?既异乎我与若矣,恶能正之。使异乎我与若者正之?既同乎我与若矣,恶能正之。然则我与若与人,俱不能相知也,而待彼也邪?何谓和之以天倪?曰:是不是,然不然。是若果是也,则是之异乎不是也亦无辩;然若果然也,则然之异乎不然也亦无辩。化声之相待,若其不相待,和之以天倪,因之以曼衍,所以穷年也。忘年忘义,振於无竟,故富诸无竟。罔两问綦曰:曩子行,今子止;囊子坐,今子起。何其无特操,与?綦曰:吾有待而武,然者邪?
Interpretation

These words sound strange and hard to understand, so they are called “paradoxical” (unexpected, elusive statements). Even if one had to wait through ten thousand generations to meet a great sage who could grasp their meaning, that would be just like meeting such a person sooner or later.

Suppose you and I argue, and you win while I do not. Does that prove you are certainly right and I am certainly wrong? Suppose I win while you do not. Does that prove I am certainly right and you are certainly wrong? It may be that one of us is right and the other wrong; it may also be that both of us are right, or neither of us is right. Since neither you nor I can decide who is right or wrong, whom should we ask to judge?

Should we ask someone who agrees with you? Since that person agrees with you, how could they judge fairly? Should we ask someone who agrees with me? Since that person agrees with me, they would be just as unable to judge fairly. Should we ask someone who disagrees with both you and me? Since that person disagrees with us both, how could they decide? Asking someone who agrees with both you and me would leave us with the same problem. It seems, then, that you, I, and everyone else are unable to decide one another’s rights and wrongs. Must we simply wait for someone else to judge?

What does it mean to follow the “Heavenly Pivot” (the natural boundaries and measures) to harmonize different views? It means recognizing that “this is so” and “this is not so” each have their grounds, and that “this way” and “not this way” each have their grounds. If a particular claim truly holds, then there is no need to argue further between it and its opposite. If a particular judgment is truly so, then there is no need to argue further between it and the judgment that it is not so. All words stand opposed to one another and depend on one another. Follow their natural changes and harmonize them, letting them continue to shift and unfold, and you may live out your life. Forget the length of your life, and forget distinctions between right and wrong. Set your heart and body moving in the boundless, and your state of mind, too, can become limitless.

The Shadow’s Fringe asked the Shadow, “A moment ago you were walking, and now you have stopped; a moment ago you were sitting, and now you have risen. Why do you have no will of your own?”

The Shadow replied, “Do I act this way because I depend on something? And does what I depend on act this way because it depends on something else? Do I depend on something like the scales beneath a snake’s belly or a cicada’s wings? How can I know why I am as I am, or why I am not as I am?”

吾所待又有待而然者邪?待蛇馆绸翼,故富诸无竟。罔两问綦曰:曩子行,今子止;囊子坐,今子起。何其无特操,与?綦曰:吾有待而武,然者邪?吾所待又有待而然者邪?待蛇馆绸翼邪?恶识所以然?恶识所以不然?昔者庄周梦为胡蝶,栩栩然胡媒也!自喻适志与。不知周也。俄然觉,则蓬蓬然周也。不知周之梦为胡蝶与,胡蝶之梦为周与?周与胡蝶,则必有分矣。此之谓物化。 内篇养生主第三
Interpretation

What is it that I rely on? Must it depend on something else to exist? Must it depend on a snake, a worm, a silkworm, or a butterfly? How can I know why things are as they are, or why they are not otherwise?

Once, Zhuang Zhou dreamed he had become a butterfly, fluttering freely and contentedly, as if he truly were a butterfly, entirely pleased with himself and unaware that he was Zhuang Zhou. Suddenly he awoke and realized that he was still Zhuang Zhou. He did not know whether Zhuang Zhou had dreamed of becoming a butterfly, or the butterfly had dreamed of becoming Zhuang Zhou. Between Zhuang Zhou and the butterfly there must be some distinction. This is called “the transformation of things” (the mutual transformation and change of things).

吾生也有涯,而知也无涯中以有励涯随无涯,殆已;已而为知者,殆而已矣。为善无近名,为一恶无近刑。缘督以为经,可以保身,可以全生,可以养亲,可以尽年。庖丁为文惠君解牛,手之所触,肩之所倚,足之所履,膝之所踦,砉然向然,奏刀駖然,莫不中音,合於桑林之舞,乃中经首之会。文惠君曰:嘻,善之所倚,足之所履,膝之所踦,砉然向然,奏刀駖然,莫不中音,合於桑林之舞,乃中经首之会。文惠君曰:嘻,善哉。技盖至此乎?庖丁释刀对曰:臣之所好者道也,进乎技矣。始臣之万牛之时,所见无非牛者。三年之后,未尝具全牛也。方今之时,臣以神遇而不以目视,官知士而神欲行。依乎天理,批大却,导大窾,因其固然;技经肯萦之未尝,一而祝大辄乎。良庖岁更刀,割也;族庖月更刀,折也。今臣之刀十九年矣,所解数千牛;而刀刃若新发於硎。彼节者有问,而刀刃者无厚。以无厚入有问,恢恢乎其於游刃3必有余地矣,是以十九年而刀刃若新发於硎。虽然,每至於族,吾见其难为,休然为戒,视为止,行为迟,动刀甚微。谍然已解,如土委地。提刀而立,为之四顾,为之踌躇痛志,善刀而戴之。
Interpretation

Human life is finite, while knowledge has no bounds. To pursue limitless knowledge with a finite life leads to exhaustion; to keep pursuing it will only wear you down further. Do good without seeking fame, and do no wrong so far that you incur punishment. Follow the natural, balanced Way and make it your constant practice: then you can preserve your body, care for your life, support your family, and enjoy a long life.

When the cook Ding was butchering an ox for Lord Wenhui, his hands touched the ox, his shoulder leaned against it, his feet braced it, and his knees pressed against it. His movements rang out crisply, and his knife made its own sounds as it went in. Not a single beat was out of time. He seemed to be dancing to the “Mulberry Grove” music and keeping time with the “Jingshou” melody. Lord Wenhui exclaimed, “Wonderful! Could the art of butchering an ox really reach such a level?”

Cook Ding set down his knife and replied, “What I pursue is the Dao (the Way); it has gone beyond mere technique. When I first began butchering oxen, all I saw was a whole ox. After three years, I no longer saw a whole ox. Now I meet the ox with my spirit, not merely with my eyes. The senses fall silent, and my spirit moves according to the ox’s structure. I follow the natural patterns of its body, guide my knife into the larger spaces between its sinews and bones, and pass it through the broad openings, cutting in accordance with the ox’s own structure. I never strike tangled sinews or joined bones, much less the large bones themselves.

“A good cook changes his knife once a year, because he uses it to slice meat. An ordinary cook changes his knife once a month, because he uses it to hack at bones. I have used my knife for nineteen years and butchered several thousand oxen, yet its edge is as sharp as if it had just been honed on a whetstone. The joints of an ox have gaps, while a knife’s edge is almost without thickness. When a blade this thin enters the gaps between the joints, there is ample room for it to move. That is why, after nineteen years, it is still as sharp as if it had just been honed.

“Even so, whenever I come to a place where sinews and bones are tangled, I recognize the difficulty and become cautious. I fix my gaze, slow my movements, and guide the knife in gently. The ox comes apart at once, like clods of earth falling to the ground. I lift my knife and stand, look around, and pause with satisfaction. Then I wipe the knife clean and put it away.”

This story of Cook Ding butchering an ox shows that a skilled person can act in accordance with the structure of things themselves. Even with great skill, one must still take care when faced with complexity.

文惠君刀甚微。谍然已解,如土委地。提刀而立,为之四顾,为之踌躇痛志,善刀而戴之。文惠君曰:善哉。吾闻庖丁之育,得养生焉。公文轩见右师,而惊曰:是何人也?恶乎介也?天与,其人与?曰:天也,非人也。天之生是使独也,人之貌有与也。以是加其天也,非人也。泽雉十步一啄,百步一饮,不薪畜乎樊中。神虽王,不善也。老聘死,秦失吊之,三号而出。弟子曰:非夫子之友邪?曰:然。然则吊焉若此,可乎?曰:然。始也吾以为其人也,而今非也。向吾入而吊焉,有老者哭之,如哭其子;,三号而出。弟子曰:非夫子之友邪?曰:然。然则吊焉若此,可乎?曰:然。始也吾以为其人也,而今非也。向吾入而吊焉,有老者哭之,如哭其子;少者哭之,如哭其母。彼其所以会之。必有不蕲哭而哭者。是遁天倍情,其所受,古者谓之遁天之刑。适来,夫子时也;适去,夫子顺也。安时而处顺,哀乐不能入也,古者谓是帝之之县解。指穷於为薪,火传也,不知其尽也。 #3刃:原作『刀」,据世德本改。 内篇养生主第四
Interpretation

Lord Wen Hui said, “Excellent! From Cook Ding’s skill, I have learned the principles of nourishing life.”

Gong Wen Xuan saw the Right Master, an ancient official, and asked in astonishment, “Who is this man? How has he only one foot? Was he born that way, or did someone cause it?” Someone replied, “He was born that way; it was not done by human hands. Heaven gave him only one foot at birth. People are naturally different in appearance. To change what one is born with by human standards is not to follow nature.”

A wild pheasant in the marsh takes ten steps to peck up one bite of food and a hundred steps to drink a mouthful of water, yet it would not want to be kept in a cage. In the wild it is full of life; in a cage, even if it is comfortable, it feels ill at ease.

After Lao Dan (Laozi) died, Qin Shi went to pay his respects. He wept a few times and then left. A disciple asked, “Was he not your friend?” Qin Shi said, “He was.” The disciple asked again, “If he was your friend, was it proper to mourn him this way?” Qin Shi replied, “Yes. At first I thought everyone who came to mourn could follow nature. Now I see that is not so. When I went inside, I saw old people weeping for him as if they had lost their own son, and young people weeping for him as if they had lost their own mother. Surely some of those gathered here do not want to weep, yet join in anyway. This is fleeing nature and going against true feeling. The ancients called it ‘escaping the punishment of Heaven’s mandate.’

“To be born into the world at just this time is to follow the moment; to depart at just this time is to follow change. At ease with the course of events and following change, sorrow and joy cannot disturb the heart. The ancients called this release from nature’s bonds. The firewood will in time be consumed, but the flame passes on. No one knows when it will go out.”

颜回见仲尼,请行曰:奚之?曰:将之卫。曰:奚为焉?曰:回闻卫君,其年壮,其行独;轻用民死,死者以国量乎泽若蕉,民其无如矣。回尝闻之夫子曰:治国去之,乱国就之,医门多疾。愿以所闻思其则。庶几其国有廖乎。仲尼曰:嘻。若殆往而刑耳。夫量乎泽若蕉,民其无如矣。回尝闻之夫子曰:治国去之,乱国就之,医门多疾。愿以所闻思其则。庶几其国有廖乎。仲尼曰:嘻。若殆往而刑耳。夫道不欲杂,杂则多,多则扰,扰则忧,忧而不救。古之至人,先存诸己而后存诸人。所存於己者未定,何暇至於暴人之所行。且若亦知夫德之所荡而知之所为出乎哉?德荡乎名,知出乎争。名也者,相轧也;知也者,争之器也。二者凶器,非所以尽行也。且德厚信征,未达人气,名闻不争,未达人心。而强以仁义绳墨之言术暴人之前者,是以人恶有其美也,命之日苗人。苗人者,人必反苗之,若殆为人苗夫?且苟为悦贤而恶不肖,恶用而求有以异以人恶有其美也,命之日苗人。苗人者,人必反苗之,若殆为人苗夫?且苟为悦贤而恶不肖,恶用而求有以异?若唯无诏,王公必将乘人而斗其捷。而目将荧之,而色将平之,口将管之,容将形之,心且成之。是以火救火,以水救水,名之日益多。
Interpretation

Yan Hui went to see Zhongni and asked permission to travel. Zhongni asked, “Where do you intend to go?” Yan Hui replied, “To the state of Wei.” Zhongni asked again, “What do you plan to do there?” Yan Hui said, “I have heard that the ruler of Wei is in his prime and acts arbitrarily. He recklessly drives the people to risk their lives. The dead are so numerous that they lie across the land like fallen plants in a marsh. The people have nowhere to turn. I once heard my teacher say that one should leave a well-governed state and go to a state in disorder. A doctor’s home is full of patients. I want to think through how to respond, drawing on what I have heard, and perhaps help improve the state.”

Zhongni said, “Alas, you will probably go there only to meet disaster and punishment. The Dao should not be made confused. Confusion leads to excess, excess to turmoil, and turmoil to anxiety—and anxiety accomplishes nothing. Those of ancient times who had reached the highest level of cultivation first settled themselves, then settled others. If you have not yet found your own footing, what strength could you have to interfere in the actions of a tyrant?

“Do you know how De is damaged, and how cleverness arises? De is damaged by the pursuit of fame; cleverness arises from the struggle to prevail. Fame sets people against one another, and cleverness becomes a weapon in their contests. Both are instruments of harm; neither can be used to fully put the Dao into practice.

“If your De is not yet deep and your sincerity has not yet won people’s trust, then to appear before a tyrant and urge him with benevolence, righteousness, and rules is to invite others to despise your virtue. This is called being a ‘sprout-man’: others will turn you into someone they can exploit or harm, and you may become a ‘sprout-man’ in their eyes.

“Besides, if you admire the worthy and despise the unworthy, why pursue a way of standing apart from everyone else? If you simply speak frankly to remonstrate, the nobles and ministers of Wei will surely seize the chance to use you and compete with you. Then your vision will be clouded, your expression suppressed, your words constrained, your bearing controlled, and your heart changed by them. It would be like trying to put out a fire with fire or a flood with water: it would only make things pile up and grow more chaotic.”

顺始无穷,若殆以不信厚言,必死於暴人之前矣。且昔者桀杀关龙逢,纣杀王子比干,是皆修其身以下偃村人之民,以下拂其上者也,故其君因其修以挤之。是好名者也。昔者尧攻丛枝、胥敖,禹功有扈,国为虚厉,身为刑戮;其用兵不止,其求实无已。是皆求名实者也,而独不闻之乎?名实者,圣人之所不能胜也,而况若乎。虽然,若必有以也,尝求名实者也,而独不闻之乎?名实者,圣人之所不能胜也,而况若乎。虽然,若必有以也,尝以语我来。颜回曰:端而虚,勉而一,则可乎?曰:恶,恶可。夫以阳为充孔扬,采色不定,常人之所不违,因案人之所感,以求容与其心,名之曰日渐之德不成,而况大德乎。将执而不化,外合而内不訾,其庸诅可乎。然则我内直而外曲,成而上比。内直者,与天为徒。与天为徒者,知天子之与己皆天之所子。而独以己言薪乎而人善之,薪乎而人不善之邪?若然者,人谓之童子,是之谓与天为徒。外曲者,与人之为徒也。而人善之,薪乎而人不善之邪?若然者,人谓之童子,是之谓与天为徒。外曲者,与人之为徒也。擎腮曲拳,人臣之礼也,人皆为之,吾敢不为邪?为人之所为者,人亦无疵焉,是之谓与人为徒。成而上比者,与古为徒,其言虽教,谪之实也;
Interpretation

Follow the nature of things, and the road ahead has no end. If you proclaim untrustworthy words as weighty truths, you may die at the hands of a violent ruler. In the past, King Jie of Xia killed Guan Longfeng, and King Zhou of Shang killed Prince Bigan. They cultivated themselves and used this to teach the people, but in doing so they also offended their rulers. The rulers therefore used their self-cultivation and pursuit of fame as grounds to marginalize and kill them. These men were devoted to fame.

Long ago, Yao attacked Congzhi and Xu’ao, and Yu conquered Youhu. As a result, these states fell into ruin, their people suffered, and their rulers were punished and killed. They waged war without end, pursuing fame and material gain without limit. These were men who sought both reputation and practical advantage. Haven’t you heard that even sages find reputation and practical gain difficult to control? How much more so for you?

Yan Hui said, “Even so, I still feel I must rely on something. Let me explain.” He said, “If I remain upright and steadfast, keep my mind empty and still, and apply myself with diligence and single-mindedness, would that do?”

Confucius replied, “How could that be enough? Your Yang energy is abundant, your sharpness is on full display, and your expression shifts unpredictably. Ordinary people do not oppose you, so you follow their reactions and let your own desires find release. This can only be called a virtue accumulated day by day; it is still not enough to achieve great virtue, let alone a higher form of virtue. If you cling to your own views and cannot adapt, appearing to agree outwardly while inwardly disagreeing, how could that ever work?”

Yan Hui said, “Then what if I am upright inwardly and tactful outwardly, and take the ancients as my model in word and deed?”

“Being upright inwardly means keeping company with Heaven. Those who keep company with Heaven know that both the ruler and they themselves are children born of Heaven. Would such a person change what is in his heart just because people praise or oppose what he says? If he can be this way, people will regard him as a child untouched by worldly ways. This is called keeping company with Heaven.

“Being tactful outwardly means getting along with people. Bowing, clasping the hands, and bending in formal greeting are all proper courtesies for a subject. Everyone else acts this way; how could I dare not? If I do what everyone else does, no one can fault me. This is called getting along with people.

“Taking the ancients as one’s model in word and deed means keeping company with the ancients. Even if what one says is meant as instruction, it is still only a judgment on present circumstances…”

古之有也,非吾有也。若然者,虽直而不病,是之谓与古为徒。若是则可乎?仲尼曰:恶,恶可。大多政法而不谋,虽固亦无罪。虽然,止是耳矣,夫胡可以及化。犹师心者也。颜回曰:吾无以进矣,敢问其方。仲尼曰:斋,吾将语若。有而为之,其易邪?易之者,嗥天不宜。颜回曰:回之家贫,唯不饮酒不姑荤者数月矣。若此,则可以为斋乎?曰:是祭杞之斋,非心斋也。回曰:敢问心斋。仲尼曰:若一志,无听之以耳而听之以心,无听之以心而听之以气。听止於耳,心止於符。气者也,虚而待物者也。唯道集虚。虚者,心斋也。颜回心,无听之以心而听之以气。听止於耳,心止於符。气者也,虚而待物者也。唯道集虚。虚者,心斋也。颜回曰:回之未始得使,实自回也;得使之也,未始有回也。可谓虚乎?夫子曰:尽矣。'吾语若。若能入游其樊而无感其名,入则呜,不入则止。无门无毒,一宅而寓於不得已。则几矣。绝迩易,无行地难。为人使易以伪,为天使难以伪。闻以有翼飞者矣,未闻以无翼飞者也;闻以有知知者矣,未闻以无知知者也。瞻彼阕者,虚室生白,吉祥止止。夫且不止,是之谓坐驰,夫徇耳目内通而外於心知,鬼神将来舍,而况人乎。
Interpretation

The ancients already possessed the Dao (the Way); it was never mine alone. A person who follows it will not be harmed by acting with integrity. This is called sharing the Way with the ancients. Can one act this way? Confucius said, “Alas, how could it be so? There are too many laws and regulations. People will only follow them by the letter and stop thinking. Even if they stubbornly cling to these rules, they may not be at fault. But that is as far as it goes. How can it be called responding to change? This still takes one’s own preconceptions as the standard.”

Yan Hui said, “I no longer know how to go further. May I ask what method there is?” Confucius said, “Fast. I will tell you. If your heart is attached to something and you still try to act, can that be easy? If you think it easy, you are not following the way of Heaven.” Yan Hui said, “My family is poor. I have gone several months without drinking wine or eating meat. Does that count as fasting?” Confucius said, “That is fasting before a sacrifice, not fasting of the heart.” Yan Hui said, “May I ask what fasting of the heart is?” Confucius said, “Make your intention single. Do not listen with your ears; listen with your heart. Do not listen with your heart; listen with Qi. Hearing through the ears stops at sound, and the heart’s activity stops at responding to things. Qi is empty and still, waiting to receive the myriad things. Only the Dao gathers in emptiness and stillness. This emptiness and stillness is fasting of the heart.”

Yan Hui said, “Before I received your teaching, I truly knew only that there was an ‘I.’ After receiving it, I felt that this ‘I’ was no longer there. Can this be called emptiness and stillness?” Confucius said, “You can say you have reached it. I will tell you more: if you can enter the confines of the human world without being stirred by its praise and blame, gain and loss; speak when you can speak, and stop when you cannot. Have no fixed position or preconception, and simply abide in the circumstances that leave you no choice but to act. Then you will be close.”

“It is easy to cast off the attachments nearest at hand; it is hard to leave no trace in the world. When you are driven by others, it is easy to put on an act; when you follow the way of Heaven, there is no room for pretense. You may have heard that one can fly with wings, but not that one can fly without them. You may have heard that one can know through knowledge, but not that one can know without it. Look at the place of clear light: when a room is empty, brightness arises, and good fortune comes to rest there. If the heart cannot be still, this is called ‘sitting while galloping’: the body sits, but the heart races without pause. Let what the ears and eyes perceive reach inward, and let the discriminating activity of the mind withdraw. Then even spirits and ghosts will come to dwell there—how much more so human beings?”

Here, “fasting of the heart” means gathering in the mind and waiting for things in emptiness and stillness. “Qi” refers to a state that is not governed by fixed preconceptions and can receive the myriad things in emptiness and stillness.

是万物之化也,禹舜之所纽也,伏羲几莲之所行终,而况散焉者乎。叶公子高将使於齐,问於仲尼曰:,鬼神将来舍,而况人乎。是万物之化也,禹舜之所纽也,伏羲几莲之所行终,而况散焉者乎。叶公子高将使於齐,问於仲尼曰:王使诸梁也甚重,齐之待使者,盖将甚敬而不急匹夫犹未可动也,而况诸侯乎?吾甚栗之。子尝语诸梁也曰:凡事若小若大,寡不道以欢成。事若不成,则必有人道之患;事若成,则必有阴阳之患。若成若不成而后无患者,唯有德者能之。吾食也执粗而不臧,爨无欲清之人。今吾朝受命而夕饮冰,我其内热与。吾未至乎事之情,而既有阴阳之患矣;事若不成,必有人道之患。是两也,为人臣者不足以任之,子其有以语我来。仲尼曰:天下有大戒二:其一命也,其一义也。子之爱亲,命也,不可解於心;臣之事君,义也,无适而非君也,无所进於天地之间。是之谓大戒。是以夫事其仲尼曰:天下有大戒二:其一命也,其一义也。子之爱亲,命也,不可解於心;臣之事君,义也,无适而非君也,无所进於天地之间。是之谓大戒。是以夫事其亲者,不择地而安之,孝之至也;夫事其君者,不择事而安之,忠之盛也;自事其心者,一及乐不易施乎前,知其不可奈何而安之若命,德之至也。
Interpretation

All things are constantly changing. This is also the fundamental principle on which Xia Yu and Yu Shun governed the realm. The deeds of Fuxi and the sages of antiquity, too, ultimately came to rest in change—how much more so the scattered and insignificant things of the world?

Lord Ye Gongzi Gao, whose personal name was Zhuliang, was about to serve as an envoy to Qi. He sought advice from Zhongni (Confucius): “My ruler has entrusted this mission to me with great seriousness. Qi will surely receive its envoy with great courtesy, but that does not mean it will act quickly. It is hard enough to persuade an ordinary person; how much harder a feudal lord! I am deeply worried about this. You once told me that few affairs, whether large or small, can be completed smoothly without following the right course. If the mission fails, I will surely suffer harm at the hands of others; if it succeeds, I will surely be worn down by the changes of Yin-Yang. Only a person of De can avoid worry whether things succeed or fail. I usually eat simply, without seeking fine flavors, and I do not crave coolness. But this morning, as soon as I received the mission, I was drinking iced water by evening. My heart must be burning with anxiety. Before I have even learned the facts of the matter, my body and mind are already being affected by the changes of Yin-Yang. If the mission fails, I will surely bring harm upon myself from others as well. As a mere minister, I cannot bear these two kinds of worry. Please advise me.”

Zhongni said, “There are two great principles in the world: one is destiny, the other is duty. A child’s love for their parents is destiny, bestowed by nature; it cannot be cut away from the heart. A minister’s service to the ruler is duty, required by one’s station. Wherever one may be, one remains within the ruler’s domain; under Heaven and Earth, there is nowhere to escape it. These are the great principles.

“So in serving one’s parents, one does not choose the place, but seeks only to be at ease while fulfilling one’s filial duty: this is the highest form of filial devotion. In serving one’s ruler, one does not choose the task, but seeks only to accept it calmly: this is the highest form of loyalty. To cultivate one’s heart so that, whatever one’s circumstances, its calm and joy do not change; to understand that some things cannot be helped, and to face them calmly as one accepts destiny—this is the highest form of De.”

为人臣子者,固有所不得已。行事之情而忘其身?何暇至於悦生而恶?死夫子其行可矣。丘请复以所闻:凡交近则必相靡以信,远财必忠之以言,言必或传之。夫传两喜两怒之言,天下之难者也。夫两喜必多溢美之言,两怒必多忠之以言,言必或传之。夫传两喜两怒之言,天下之难者也。夫两喜必多溢美之言,两怒必多溢恶之言。凡溢之类妄,妄则其信之也莫,莫则传言者殃。故法言曰:传其常情,无传其溢言,则几乎全。且以巧斗力者,始乎阳,常卒乎阴,泰至则多奇巧;以礼饮酒者,始乎治,常卒乎乱,泰至则多奇乐。凡事亦然:始乎谅,常卒乎鄙;其作始也简,其将毕也必巨。言者,风波也。行者,实丧也。夫风波易以动,实丧易以危。故忿设无由,巧言偏辞。兽死不择音,气息第然,於是并生心厉。克核太至,则必有不肖之心应之,而不知其然也。苟为不知其然也,孰知其所终?故法言曰:无迁令,无劝成,过度益也。迁令劝成殆事,美成在久,恶成不为不知其然也,孰知其所终?故法言曰:无迁令,无劝成,过度益也。迁令劝成殆事,美成在久,恶成不及改,可不慎与?且夫乘物以游心,托不得已以养中,至矣。何作为报也?莫若为致命,此其难者。
Interpretation

A minister often truly finds himself in an unavoidable predicament. When he acts according to what is right, he may even disregard his own safety. How could he then be intent on clinging to life and fearing death? What you have done is enough. Let me share what I have heard: those who are close to one another treat each other with sincerity in their dealings, while those who are distant often express their loyalty in words—and those words are frequently passed on to others.

Conveying words that leave both sides pleased, or both sides angry, is the hardest task in the world. When both sides are pleased, the words often contain excessive praise; when both are angry, they often contain excessive blame. Words that go too far are mostly untrue. When words are untrue, people find them hard to believe, and the messenger may suffer for it. So an old saying goes: “Pass on only what happened as it was; do not pass on words that exaggerate. That is about the best way to preserve yourself.”

When people compete through skill rather than strength, things may begin openly and fairly, but often end in covert scheming. Taken to extremes, this gives rise to all kinds of deceitful tactics. When people drink according to ritual, the gathering may begin in good order, but often ends in confusion. Taken to extremes, it becomes an occasion for unrestrained revelry. So it is with all kinds of affairs: they may begin in sincerity, but often end in shallowness. What seems simple at the outset can become complicated and serious as the end draws near.

Words are like wind and waves: they can stir up turmoil in affairs. Actions determine whether things succeed or fail, and what is gained or lost. Wind and waves can easily unsettle people; success and failure, gain and loss, can just as easily put them in danger. Anger that erupts without cause often comes from clever words and one-sided accounts that stir people’s feelings. When a beast is near death, it no longer chooses its cries; it only gasps for breath. In such circumstances, people too may give rise to cruel and hurtful thoughts. If you pursue blame and censure too far, you will draw an ill response, without knowing why. If you do not know how matters came to this, who can foresee where they will end?

So an old saying goes: “Do not alter orders on your own, and do not press for affairs to be completed quickly. If you go too far, you will only create more trouble. Good things take sustained effort to accomplish; once bad things have taken shape, it is often too late to undo them.” Can one afford to be careless?

To go along with things as they are and let the mind remain at ease, and to dwell in unavoidable circumstances while cultivating one’s inner self—this is the highest attainment. Why, then, deliberately do anything to repay another? Better to entrust everything to fate. This is the hardest thing of all.

颜闱将传卫灵公太子,而问於莲伯玉曰:有人於此,其德天杀。与之为无方,则危吾国;与之为有方,则危吾身。其知适足以知人之过,而不知其所以过。若然者,吾奈之何?权伯玉曰:善哉问乎。戒之慎之,正汝身哉。形莫若就,心莫若和。虽然,之二者有患。就不欲入,和不欲出。形就而入,且为颠为灭,为崩为蹶。心和而出,且为声为名,为妖为孽。彼且为婴儿,亦与之为婴儿,彼且为无叮畦,亦与之为无叮畦;彼且为无崖颠为灭,为崩为蹶。心和而出,且为声为名,为妖为孽。彼且为婴儿,亦与之为婴儿,彼且为无叮畦,亦与之为无叮畦;彼且为无崖,亦与之为无崖。达之,入於无疵。汝不知夫螳娘乎?怒其臂以当车辙,不知其不胜任也,是其才之美者也。戒之,慎之。积伐而美者以犯之,几矣。汝不知夫养虎者乎?不敢以生物与之,为其杀之之怒也;不敢以全物与之,为其央之之怒也。时其饥饱,达其怒心。虎之与人异类而媚养己者,顺也;故其杀者,逆也。夫爱马者,以筐盛矢,以娠盛溺。适有蚊虻仆绿,而村之不时,则缺衔毁首碎胸。意有所至而爱有所亡,可不慎邪?匠石之齐,至于曲辕,见砾社树。其大蔽牛,絮之百围,其高临山,十仞而后有枝,其可以为舟者旁十数。观者如市有所亡,可不慎邪?
Interpretation

Yan Hui was about to entrust the care of Duke Ling of Wei’s heir to Lian Boyu, so he asked, “There is a person whose nature seems destined to harm others. If we let him do as he pleases, he will endanger the state; if we restrain him with rules, he will endanger himself. His intelligence can see other people’s faults, but not why he himself goes wrong. What should I do with someone like this?”

Quan Boyu said, “That is a good question. Be alert and cautious, and first set yourself right. In your outward conduct, it is best to go along with him; in your inward attitude, it is best to remain on good terms with him. But each approach has its dangers: do not go too far in yielding to him, and do not show too openly how accommodating you are. If you outwardly comply but become too deeply entangled, he may overturn you, destroy you, and bring you to ruin. If you inwardly keep the peace but show it too plainly, you may attract attention and even invite disaster.

“If he is like an infant, treat him as you would an infant. If he has no restraints, do not deliberately impose them. If he has no boundaries, adapt yourself to him. Only by navigating the world in this way can you avoid inviting trouble.

“Have you never seen a praying mantis? It raises its forelegs to block a wheel, unaware that it has no power to stop it, and thinking only that its own strength is exceptional. Be alert and cautious. If you keep flaunting your strengths and acting recklessly, provoking the other person, you will be in danger.

“Have you never seen someone who raises tigers? He does not dare feed them live animals, because that stirs their savage urge to pounce and kill. Nor does he hand them an entire carcass, because they may grow angry as they tear at it. The keeper knows when they are hungry or full and channels their anger. Tigers and people are not the same kind, yet the tigers can grow close to their keeper because he follows their nature. They injure people when someone acts against it.

“Someone who loves his horse uses a bamboo basket for its dung and a shell cup to catch its urine. One day, a mosquito or horsefly lands on the horse. If the owner cannot gently shoo it away in time and instead strikes at it suddenly, the horse may snap its bridle, injure its head, and crack its chest. His intention is to care for it, but his actions end up harming it. Can one afford to be anything but cautious?

“When Craftsman Shi went to Qi, he passed through Quyuan and saw a shrine tree, a tree dedicated to the local earth spirit. It was so massive it could shelter a herd of cattle, and its trunk was so broad that a hundred people with arms linked could barely encircle it. The tree soared into the mountains, and its branches began more than ten ren above the ground. Its timber could have made more than a dozen boats. Onlookers thronged around it like people at a market. Can one afford to be anything but cautious?”

匠石之齐,至于曲辕,见砾社树。其大蔽牛,絮之百围,其高临山,十仞而后有枝,其可以为舟者旁十数。观者如市,匠伯不顾,遂行不辗。弟子厌观之,走及匠石,曰:自吾执斧斤以随夫子,未尝见材如此之美也。先生不肯视,行不辍,何邪?曰:已矣,勿言之矣。散木也,以为舟则沈,以为棺椁则速腐,以为器则速毁,以为门户则滚构,以为树则蠹。是不材之木也,无所可用,故能若是之寿。匠石归,砾社见梦曰:汝将恶乎比予哉?若将比予於文木邪?夫祖梨橘柚,果蕨之属,实熟则剥,则辱;大枝折,小枝泄。此以其能苦其生者也,故不终其天年而中道夭,自拮击於世俗者也。物莫不若是。且予求无所可用久矣,几死,乃今得之,此以其能苦其生者也,故不终其天年而中道夭,自拮击於世俗者也。物莫不若是。且予求无所可用久矣,几死,乃今得之,为予大用。使子也而有用,且得有此大也邪?且也若与予也皆物也,奈何哉其相物也?而几死之散人,又恶知散木。匠石觉而诊其梦。弟子曰:趣取无用,则为社何邪?曰:密,若无言。彼亦直寄焉,以为不知己者诟厉也。不为社者,且几有剪乎。且也彼其所保与众异,而以义誉之,不亦远乎?南伯子景游乎商之丘,见大木焉有异,结驷千乘,隐将花其所籁。
Interpretation

Carpenter Shi traveled to the state of Qi and came to Quyuan, where he saw a great tree growing beside the shrine to the local earth god. Its crown was broad enough to shelter oxen, and its trunk so thick that a hundred people could join hands around it. It towered nearly as high as a mountain, and its branches did not begin to grow until ten ren—a traditional unit of length—above the ground. More than a dozen of its limbs were large enough to make boats. A crowd gathered around it like people at a marketplace, but Carpenter Shi did not even glance at it and walked straight past.

His apprentice gazed at the tree for a long time, then ran after Carpenter Shi and asked, “Since I first followed you with an axe, I have never seen such fine timber. Yet you would not even look at it, and you kept walking. Why?”

“Enough,” Carpenter Shi said. “Don’t speak of it. It is a useless tree, unfit for timber. Make it into a boat, and it will sink; make it into a coffin, and it will rot quickly. Make it into an implement, and it will soon break. Use it for a door, and it will leak; use it for a pillar, and insects will eat into it. It is a tree with no practical use, good for nothing. That is why it has lived so long.”

After Carpenter Shi returned home, the great tree beside the earth god’s shrine appeared to him in a dream and said, “What do you compare me with? Do you mean to compare me with useful trees? Pear, orange, and pomelo trees bear fruit, and when it ripens, it is picked. They are harmed in the process: their large branches are broken, and their smaller ones are pulled and damaged. Their abilities bring suffering upon their own lives, so they cannot enjoy the full span of their years. They are often cut down before their time, bringing ordinary people’s harm upon themselves. Most things are like this.

“I have sought uselessness for a long time, and came close to dying because of it. Only now have I finally attained it. It is because I am useless that I have been able to preserve my life. If I were useful, could I have grown so large? You and I are both among the myriad things—how can we judge one another and decide what the other is? You, a useless man who nearly died, how could you understand a useless tree?”

Carpenter Shi woke and told his apprentice about the dream. The apprentice asked, “If the tree seeks uselessness, why does it serve as the shrine tree beside the local earth god’s temple?”

“Enough,” said Carpenter Shi. “It merely takes shelter there. It treats people’s failure to understand it, and their calling it bad, as an insult. If it did not serve as the shrine tree, it would probably have been cut down long ago. Besides, what it preserves in itself is unusual. To praise it by ordinary standards would be far from understanding it, wouldn’t it?”

Nanbo Zijing was traveling through Shangqiu when he saw an extraordinary great tree. Its girth was enough to tie up many chariots and horses, and its shade was broad enough to shelter many people riding in carriages.

子蓦曰:此何木也哉?此必且几有剪乎。且也彼其所保与众异,而以义誉之,不亦远乎?南伯子景游乎商之丘,见大木焉有异,结驷千乘,隐将花其所籁。子蓦曰:此何木也哉?此必有异材夫。仰而视其细枝,则拳曲而不可以为栋梁;俯而视其大根,则轴解而不可以为棺椁;咕其叶,则口烂而为伤;嗅之,则使人狂酝,三日而不已。子蓦曰:此果不材之木也,以至於此其大也。嗟乎神人,以此不材。宋有刻氏者,宜揪柏桑。其拱把而上者,求狙猴之代者斩之;三围四围,求高名之丽者斩之;七围八围,贵人此其大也。嗟乎神人,以此不材。宋有刻氏者,宜揪柏桑。其拱把而上者,求狙猴之代者斩之;三围四围,求高名之丽者斩之;七围八围,贵人富商之家求禅傍者斩之。故未终其天年,而中道夭於斧斤,此材之患也。故解之以牛之白颗者与豚之亢鼻者,与人有痔病者不可以适河。此皆巫祝以知之矣,所以为不祥也。此乃神人之所以为大祥也。支离疏者,顾隐於齐,肩高於顶,会撮指天,五管在上,两骸为胁。挫缄治懈,足以蝴口;鼓荚播精,足以食十人。上征武士,则支离攘臂於其问;上有大后,则支离以有常疾不受功;上与病者栗,则受三锺与十束薪。夫支离其形者,犹足以养其身,终其天年,又况支离其德者乎?
Interpretation

Zi Mo asked, “What kind of tree is this? It must be close to being cut down. Its nature differs from that of other trees, yet people praise it as ‘fitting the proper order.’ Doesn’t that take it far from its true nature?”

Nanbo Zijing, a man’s name, was traveling in the hills of Shang when he saw a remarkable tree, its shade broad enough to shelter many carriages and horses. Zi Mo asked, “What kind of tree is this? It must have something unusual about it.” He looked up at its branches: they twisted and curled, making them useless for roof beams. He looked down at its roots: the wood was loose and could not be used for coffins. He tasted its leaves, and his mouth broke out in sores. He smelled its scent, and his mind became confused for three days before he recovered. Zi Mo said, “It truly is a useless tree. That is why it has been able to grow so large. Ah, it is precisely through this kind of ‘uselessness’ that a spiritual person can grow so great.”

In the state of Song, a man named Ke made his living cutting down catalpa, cypress, and mulberry trees. When a tree grew to a thickness of one or two arm spans, it would be felled if its wood was suitable for making a monkey perch. When it grew to three or four arm spans, it would be felled if it could be made into a tall, splendid vessel. When it grew to seven or eight arm spans, a noble or wealthy merchant would have it cut down to make a coffin and outer coffin. So trees often died halfway through their natural lifespan, struck down by axe and saw before their time. This is the calamity that useful timber brings upon itself.

In ancient times, when people performed rites to the River God, a white-fronted ox, a pig with an upturned snout, or a person suffering from hemorrhoids could not be offered in sacrifice. Even shamans and ritual officiants knew these taboos, for such things were considered inauspicious. Yet, from the perspective of a spiritual person, this was instead a great blessing.

Zhili Shu, a man with a deformed body, lived in the state of Qi. His shoulders rose above his head, his topknot pointed toward the sky, his internal organs were positioned high in his body, and his thighs resembled his ribs. He earned his living by sewing and washing clothes; shaking a winnowing basket and sifting bran were enough to support ten people. When the state called up soldiers, he could wave his arms and walk right past the recruiters. When the state conscripted laborers, his disability exempted him from service. When the state distributed relief to the sick, he could still receive three measures of grain and ten bundles of firewood. If even a physically deformed person could support himself and live out his natural lifespan, how much more so someone whose De is not constrained by worldly standards?

上有大后,则支离以有常疾不受功;上与病者栗,则受三锺与十束薪。夫支离其形者,犹足以养其身,终其天年,又况支离其德者乎?孔子适楚,楚狂接舆游其门曰:凤兮凤兮。何如德之衰也。来世不可待,往世不可追也。天下有道,圣人成焉;天下无道,圣人生焉。方今之时,仅免刑焉。福轻乎羽,莫之知载;祸重乎地,莫之知避。已乎,已乎!.临人以德。殆乎殆乎,画地而趋。迷阳迷阳,无伤吾行。吾行却曲,无伤吾足。山木自寇也,膏火自煎也。桂可食,故伐之;漆可用,故割之。人皆知有用之用,而莫知无用之伤吾足。山木自寇也,膏火自煎也。桂可食,故伐之;漆可用,故割之。人皆知有用之用,而莫知无用之用也。 内篇德充符第五
Interpretation

When those in power saw Zhili Shu, a man with a deformed body, they exempted him from corvée labor and conscription because his disability left him unable to perform such work. The authorities also provided relief to the sick and weak, so Zhili Shu received three measures of grain and ten bundles of firewood. If a person with a deformed body can still support himself and live out his allotted years, how much more can someone who does not cling to worldly standards of Virtue and whose inner spirit is free from worldly entanglements?

When Confucius arrived in Chu, the madman Jieyu passed by the gate of his lodging, singing: “Phoenix, oh Phoenix! How far your Virtue has declined! The future cannot be awaited, and the past cannot be recovered. When the world is governed by the Dao, sages can accomplish their work. When the world is without the Dao, sages can only preserve their lives. In this age, it is enough simply to escape punishment. Fortune is as light as a feather, yet no one knows how to bear it; calamity is as heavy as the earth, yet no one knows how to avoid it. Enough, enough! Do not use your Virtue to instruct others. Dangerous, dangerous! You mark out your path too firmly, then keep walking along it.”

“Thorny grass, thorny grass, do not wound my journey. Though my path twists and turns, do not wound my feet. Trees on the mountains are felled because they are useful; lamp oil consumes itself because it can burn. The cinnamon tree is cut down because it can be eaten; the lacquer tree is tapped because it can produce lacquer. Everyone knows the uses of what is useful, but no one knows that the useless has its own use.”

鲁有兀者王驸,从之游者与仲尼相若。常季问於仲尼曰:王胎,兀者也,从之游者与夫子中分鲁。立不教,坐不议;虚而往,实而归。固有不言之教,无形而心成者邪?是何人也?仲尼曰:夫子,圣人也,丘也直后而未往耳。丘将以为师,而况不若丘者乎。奚假鲁国,丘将引天下而与从之。常季曰:彼兀者也,而王先生,其与庸亦远矣。若丘也直后而未往耳。丘将以为师,而况不若丘者乎。奚假鲁国,丘将引天下而与从之。常季曰:彼兀者也,而王先生,其与庸亦远矣。若然者,其用心也独若之何?仲尼曰:死生亦大矣,而不得与之变,虽天地覆坠,亦将不与之遗。审乎无假而不与物迁,命物之化而守其宗也。常季曰:何谓也?仲尼曰:自其异者视之,肝胆楚越也;自其同者视之,万物皆一也。夫若然者,且不知耳目之所宜,而游心乎德之和;物视其所一而不见其所丧,视丧其足犹遗土也。常季曰:彼为己以其知,得其心以其心。得其常心,物何为最之哉?仲尼曰:人莫鉴於流水而鉴於止水,唯止能止众止。受命於地,唯松相独也在冬夏青青;受命於天,唯舜独也正,幸能正生,以正众生。夫保始之征,不惧之实;勇士一人,雄入於九军。将求名而能自要者,而犹若是,而况官天地,府万物,直,以正众生。
Interpretation

In the state of Lu, there was a man named Wang Tai who had undergone punishment by amputation—one of his feet had been cut off. Yet the number of people who studied and associated with him was as great as the number of Confucius’s disciples. Chang Ji asked Confucius, “Wang Tai is a man who has undergone amputation, yet nearly half the people in Lu follow him. He does not teach when standing or discuss anything when seated, but people come to him empty and leave filled. Can there really be a kind of teaching that does not rely on words, yet quietly brings the mind to fulfillment? What sort of person is he?”

Confucius said, “Master Wang is a sage. I am simply behind him and have not yet gone to pay him a visit. I would take him as my teacher—how much more should those less accomplished than I? It is not only the people of Lu: I would lead the whole world to follow him.”

Chang Ji said, “Though his body is impaired, he has become a teacher, so it seems he far surpasses ordinary people. Even someone like you is merely behind him and has not yet gone to pay him a visit. You would take him as your teacher—how much more should those less accomplished than you? It is not only the people of Lu: you would lead the whole world to follow him. What is this man’s inner nature like?”

Confucius said, “Life and death are great matters in human existence, yet they do not disturb him as they change. Even if Heaven and Earth were to topple and collapse, he would not lose himself. He understands that nothing among the myriad things has a fixed, unchanging basis, and so he is not moved by external things. He lets the myriad things change while holding fast to the root.”

Chang Ji asked, “What does that mean?”

Confucius said, “Seen in terms of their differences, the liver and the gallbladder, or the states of Chu and Yue, are far apart. Seen in terms of what they share, the myriad things belong to one whole. A person like this does not cling to what pleases the ears and eyes, but lets the mind and spirit wander freely in the harmony of De (Virtue/Power). He values what all things have in common and does not dwell on what has been lost. To him, losing one foot is like losing a clod of earth.”

Chang Ji said, “He cultivates himself through his own wisdom and understands the mind through his own heart. He has attained a constant, unchanging original mind. Why, then, should external things honor him?”

Confucius said, “People do not look at themselves in flowing water; they look in still water. Only still water can reflect all things. The pine and cypress receive the nature of Earth, and only they remain green through both winter and summer. Shun received the Mandate of Heaven, and only he could set himself right and, through the good fortune of his own rectitude, bring the people into alignment. To hold fast to the signs of one’s original nature is to embody a true fearlessness. A brave warrior may charge alone into the midst of nine armies, yet still be seeking fame and deliberately spurring himself on. How much more so for one who can govern Heaven and Earth, encompass the myriad things, set himself right, and bring all people into alignment?”

夫保始之征,不惧之实;勇士一人,雄入於九军。将求名而能自要者,而犹若是,而况官天地,府万物,直寓六骸,象耳目,一知之所知,而心未尝死者乎。彼且择日而登假,人则从是也。彼且何肯以物为事乎。申徒嘉,兀者也,而与郑子产同师於伯昏无人。子产谓申徒嘉曰:我先出则子止,子先出则我止。其明日,又与合堂同席而坐。子产谓申徒嘉曰:我先出则子止,子先出则我止。今我将出,子可以止乎,其未邪?且子见执政而不违,子齐执政乎?申徒嘉曰:先生之门,固有执政焉如此哉?子而悦子之执政而后人者也?闻之曰:鉴明则尘垢不止,止则不明也。久与贤人处则无过乎。今子之所取大者,先生也,而犹出言若是,不亦过乎?子产曰:子既若是矣,犹与尧争善,计子止,止则不明也。久与贤人处则无过乎。今子之所取大者,先生也,而犹出言若是,不亦过乎?子产曰:子既若是矣,犹与尧争善,计子之德不足以自反邪?申徒嘉曰:自状其过以不当亡者众,不状其过以不当存者寡,知不可素何而安之若命,唯有德者能之。游於羿之壳中,中央者,中地也,然而不中者,命也。人以其全足笑吾不全足者众矣,我佛然而怒;而适先生之所,则废然而反。不知先生之洗我以善邪?
Interpretation

Those who preserve their life’s original nature can keep their hearts free of fear. They are like warriors who charge alone into an army of nine divisions. Someone who drives himself onward in pursuit of fame can still manage this; how much more so those who take Heaven and Earth as their master, regard the myriad things as their storehouse, see the body as a temporary lodging, and treat the eyes and ears as outward appearances. They use what they know in their hearts to understand things, yet never let external things rob their hearts of vitality. Such people can choose a day and journey far into the heavens, and others will follow them. Would people like this ever let external things become a burden?

Shentu Jia, whose foot had been cut off, studied under Bohun Wuren alongside Zheng Zichan. Zichan said to him, “If I leave first, you stay here; if you leave first, I’ll stay.” The next day, the two were again in the same room, listening to the teaching together and seated side by side. Zichan said, “If I leave first, you stay; if you leave first, I’ll stay. Now I’m leaving. You should stay, shouldn’t you? Or are you refusing to stay? When you see a man in power, you don’t step aside. Do you think you are his equal?”

Shentu Jia replied, “Are there really men in power who rely on their authority like this in our teacher’s school? You use your position as a man in power to put others behind you. I’ve heard that when a mirror is bright, dust and grime cannot settle on it. If grime does settle, the mirror is no longer bright. After spending a long time with a worthy person, one should no longer make mistakes. You esteem our teacher above all, yet you still say things like this. Isn’t that a mistake?”

Zichan said, “You’re already in your condition, yet you still want to argue with Yao over who is more benevolent. I suppose you refuse to stop because your Virtue is not yet enough to make you reflect on yourself.”

Shentu Jia said, “Many people make excuses for their mistakes, saying they should not be punished. Only a few make no excuses. They understand that things cannot be controlled in advance, and accept them calmly, as though everything were fated. Only a person of Virtue can do this. It is like moving about within the range of Yi’s arrows: standing right in the middle makes you most likely to be hit. If you are not hit, that too is fate. Many people mock me because my feet are not whole, and I often fly into a rage. But as soon as I arrive at our teacher’s, my anger disappears. I don’t know whether our teacher has washed my heart clean with the good Dao.”

吾与夫子游十九年矣,而未尝知吾兀者也。今子与我游於形骸之内,而子索我於形骸之外,不亦过乎?子产蹴然改容更貌曰:子无乃称。鲁有兀者叔山无趾,踵见仲尼。仲尼曰:子不谨,前既犯患若是矣。虽今,而子索我於形骸之外,不亦过乎?子产蹴然改容更貌曰:子无乃称。鲁有兀者叔山无趾,踵见仲尼。仲尼曰:子不谨,前既犯患若是矣。虽今来,何及矣。无趾曰:吾唯不知务而轻用吾身,吾是以亡足。今吾来也,犹有尊足者存,吾是以务全之也。夫天无不覆,地无不载,吾以夫子为天地,安知夫子之犹若是也。孔子曰:丘则陋矣。夫子胡不入乎,请讲以所闻。无趾出。孔子曰:弟子勉之。夫无趾,兀者也,犹务学以复补前行之恶,而况全德之人乎。无趾语老聃曰:孔丘之於至人,其末邪?彼何宾宾以学子为?彼且薪以诙诡幻怪之名闻,不知至人之以是为己栓桔邪?老聃曰:胡不直使彼以死生为一条,以可不可为一贯者,解其栓桔,其可乎?无趾曰:天刑之,安可解。鲁哀公问於仲尼曰:卫有恶人焉,曰及驸它。丈夫与之处者,思而不能去也。
Interpretation

“I have been with my husband for nineteen years, and he has never treated me as a person who had been punished and lost a foot. Now you associate with me because you see what is within a person, yet you insist on judging me by my appearance. Isn’t that a mistake?”

Zichan’s face changed at once. “Please, say no more,” he said.

In the state of Lu, there was a man named Shushan Wuzhi who had been punished by having his foot cut off. Later, he went to see Confucius. Confucius said, “You were careless at first, and suffered this calamity because of it. Now that you have come here, what can be done?”

Wuzhi replied, “At first, I simply did not understand what mattered most, and used my body recklessly; that is why I lost my foot. I have come to see you because there are things more worthy of respect than a foot, things I must do my utmost to preserve. Heaven leaves nothing uncovered, and Earth leaves nothing unsupported. I thought you, sir, were as generous as Heaven and Earth. How could I have known you would be like this?”

Confucius said, “My understanding is limited. Please come in and tell me what you have heard.” Wuzhi then left. Confucius said to his disciples, “You should study diligently. Though Wuzhi lost his foot, he still strives to learn and make up for his past mistakes. How much more so should those whose De is whole?”

Wuzhi told Lao Dan (Laozi) about this: “Kong Qiu is still far from being a perfected person. Why does he keep putting on such an eager show of learning? He even uses his reputation for strange and bizarre ideas to attract people, unaware that a perfected person sees such things as shackles that bind him.”

Lao Dan said, “Why not simply have him regard life and death as one principle, and what is acceptable and unacceptable as a single, connected whole? That would loosen his bonds. What do you think?”

Wuzhi replied, “That punishment was imposed by Heaven. How could it be undone?”

Duke Ai of Lu asked Confucius, “In the state of Wei there is a man of strange appearance named Ai Taita. The men who spend time with him often think of him and cannot bear to leave; when women see him, they want to marry him…”

妇人见可为一贯者,解其栓桔,其可乎?无趾曰:天刑之,安可解。鲁哀公问於仲尼曰:卫有恶人焉,曰及驸它。丈夫与之处者,思而不能去也。妇人见之,请於父母曰:与为人妻,宁为夫子妾者,十数而未止也。未尝有闻其唱者也,常和人而已矣。无君人之位以济乎人之死,无聚禄以望人之腹。又以恶骇天下,和而不唱,知不出乎四域,且而雌雄合乎前,是必有异乎人者也。寡人召而观之,果以恶骇天下。与寡人处,不至以月数,而寡人有意乎其为人也;不至乎期年.,而寡人信之。国无宰,寡人传国焉。闷然而后应。泛若而辞,寡人丑乎,卒授之国。无几何也,去寡人而行,寡人恤焉若有亡也,若无与乐是国也。是何人者也?仲尼曰:丘也尝使於楚矣,适见豚子食於其死母者。少焉胸若皆弃之而走。不见己焉尔,不得类焉尔。所爱其母者,非爱国也。是何人者也?仲尼曰:丘也尝使於楚矣,适见豚子食於其死母者。少焉胸若皆弃之而走。不见己焉尔,不得类焉尔。所爱其母者,非爱其形也,爱使其形者也。战而死者,其人之葬也不以翣资;刖者之屦,无为爱之,皆无其本矣。为天子之诸御,不爪前,不穿耳;取妻者止於外,不得复使。形全犹足以为尔,而况全德之人乎。今哀驸它未言而信,无功而亲,使人授己国,唯恐其不受也,是必才全而德不形者也。一及公曰:何谓才全?
Interpretation

Some women, on seeing Ai Tuo, said to their parents, “Rather than marry someone else and be his principal wife, I would rather be his concubine.” More than ten people did so. He never took the lead in advocating anything; he always went along with what others said. He held no sovereign’s power and could not rescue the people from death and disaster. He had accumulated no wealth and could not fill anyone’s belly. His appearance was so ugly it could startle the world. In daily life he was easygoing and never tried to get ahead, and his understanding was no greater than that of ordinary people. Yet men and women alike gathered before him. He must have had something extraordinary about him.

The ruler summoned him and, sure enough, was startled by his ugliness. Before they had spent a month together, the ruler had begun to take notice of his character; before a year had passed, he trusted him. There was no chief minister in the state, and the ruler even entrusted the country to him. Ai Tuo was silent for a while before agreeing. He seemed indifferent and declined politely. The ruler felt ashamed, but in the end still handed the country over to him. Not long afterward, Ai Tuo left the ruler to travel elsewhere. The ruler felt bereft, as if he had lost something, and as if there were no one left with whom he could share the joy of governing. What sort of person was this?

Confucius said, “I once went on a mission to Chu and happened to see piglets nursing beside their dying mother. Before long, they seemed to abandon her and flee. That was because they had realized their mother no longer responded to them and was no longer like them. They loved their mother not for her physical form, but for what had made that form their mother.”

When those who have fallen in battle are buried, their coffins are not adorned with finery. People whose feet have been cut off do not treasure their old shoes, because they have lost what gave them a connection to such things. Women who become consorts of the Son of Heaven do not trim their nails long or pierce their ears. Men who marry take up residence outside the palace and are no longer summoned to serve the ruler. These people, though their bodies are intact, can still receive such treatment. How much more so for those whose De is whole?

Now Ai Tuo has said nothing, yet others trust him; he has accomplished nothing, yet others draw near to him. Someone has entrusted him with a state, and he fears only that Ai Tuo might refuse to accept it. This must be because his inborn nature is whole and his De does not show itself outwardly. The ruler asked, “What does it mean for one’s inborn nature to be whole?”

仲尼曰:死生存亡,穷达贫富,贤与不肖毁誉,饥渴寒暑,是事之变亲,使人授己国,唯恐其不受也,是必才全而德不形者也。一及公曰:何谓才全?仲尼曰:死生存亡,穷达贫富,贤与不肖毁誉,饥渴寒暑,是事之变,命之行也;日夜相代乎前,而知不能规乎其始者也。故不足以滑和,不可入於灵府。使之和豫,通而不失於兑,使日夜无郁而与物为春,是接而生时乎心者也。是之谓才全。何谓德不形?曰:平者,水停之盛也。其可以为法也,内保之而外不荡也。德者,成和之修也。德不形者,物不能离也。一及公异日以告闵子曰:始也吾以南面而君天下,执民之纪而忧其死,吾自以为至通矣。今吾闻至人之言,恐吾无其实,轻用吾身而亡其国。吾与孔丘,非君臣也,德友而已矣。闽跤支离无脤说卫灵公,灵公悦之;而视全人,其脰肩肩。瓮瓮太瘦说齐桓公,桓公悦之;而视全人,其脰肩肩。故德有所长而形有所忘而视全人,其脰肩肩。瓮瓮太瘦说齐桓公,桓公悦之;而视全人,其脰肩肩。故德有所长而形有所忘,人不忘其所忘而忘其所不忘?此谓诚忘。故圣人有所游,而知为孽,约为胶,德为接,工为商。圣人不谋,恶用知?不断,恶用胶?无丧,恶用德?不货,恶用商?四者,天斋也。天斋者,天食也。
Interpretation

Confucius said, “Life and death, survival and destruction, hardship and success, poverty and wealth, talent and lack of talent, slander and praise, hunger and thirst, cold and heat—all are changes in worldly affairs. If someone were offered a kingdom, he would still fear that he might not be willing to accept it. Such a person must have fully developed natural capacities, while his De remains hidden from view.”

Duke Ai asked, “What does it mean to have fully developed natural capacities?”

Confucius said, “Life and death, survival and destruction, hardship and success, poverty and wealth, talent and lack of talent, slander and praise, hunger and thirst, cold and heat—all are changes in worldly affairs and the workings of Heaven’s mandate. They come before us in alternating day and night, yet people cannot know when they began. So we should not let these changes disturb the peace within us, nor let them penetrate the depths of the heart. Let the heart be peaceful and joyful, and the mind open and clear without losing its delight. Let the turning of day and night leave no knot of bitterness within us. Then, as we live among the myriad things, the heart will always be as gentle as spring. This is how our capacity to respond to things arises within us at every moment. This is what it means to have fully developed natural capacities.”

Duke Ai asked again, “What does it mean for De to remain hidden from view?”

Confucius said, “Still water is the utmost in stillness, and so it can serve as a model. It is settled within, and outside things cannot disturb it. De is what harmonizes one’s nature and brings it to completion. When De remains hidden from view, the myriad things will not leave one.”

One day, Duke Ai told Minzi what he had heard. “I once thought that sitting facing south and ruling the world, holding the people’s affairs in my hands and worrying over their lives and deaths, meant that I had attained understanding. Now I have heard the words of the Perfected Person, and I fear I have no true De. I have merely acted rashly with what I possess, and may thereby lose my state. Confucius and I are not ruler and subject; we are friends joined by De.”

Yin Qizhi Li Wushen, a man with a disfigured body, went to persuade Duke Ling of Wei, who took a great liking to him. Yet when Duke Ling saw people with whole bodies, their necks seemed slender to him. Weng Danying, a man with a large growth on his neck, went to persuade Duke Huan of Qi, who also took a great liking to him. When Duke Huan saw people with whole bodies, their necks, too, seemed slender. This shows that when a person’s De advances, outward appearance is forgotten. Why, then, do people fail to forget what they should not care about, yet forget what they truly should not forget? This is called true forgetting.

Thus, the sage wanders freely in the world. Wisdom may become a source of trouble; deliberate adherence may become a restraint; De, when used to attach oneself to external things, becomes entanglement; and skill, when used to pursue profit, becomes commerce. The sage does not scheme, so what need is there for wisdom? He does not insist on making judgments, so what need is there for restraint? He has lost nothing, so what need is there to make a show of De? He does not treat things as goods to be traded, so what need is there for commercial skill? These four are all forms of fasting in accord with the Way of Heaven. What is called Heavenly Fasting is accepting the nourishment of nature as it comes.

既受食於天,又恶用人。有人之形,无人之情。有人之形,故群於人;无人之情,故是非不得於身。眇乎小哉,所以属於人也。警乎大哉,独成其天。惠子谓庄子曰:人故无情乎?庄子曰:然。惠子曰:人而无情,何以谓之人?庄子曰:道与之貌,天与之形,恶得不谓曰:人故无情乎?庄子曰:然。惠子曰:人而无情,何以谓之人?庄子曰:道与之貌,天与之形,恶得不谓之人?惠子曰:既谓之人,恶得无情?庄子曰:是非吾所谓情也。吾所谓无情者,言人之不以好恶内伤其身,常因自然而不益生也。惠子曰:不益生,何以有其身?庄子曰:道与之貌,天与之形,无以好恶内伤其身。今子外乎子之神,劳乎子之精,倚树而吟,据槁梧而暝,天选子之形,子以坚白呜。 南华真经卷之一竟
Interpretation

Since people have received the nature endowed by Heaven, they should no longer be governed by human distinctions and contrivances. Though they have human bodies, they are not burdened by ordinary emotions. Their human bodies allow them to live among others; because they are not burdened by emotion, judgments of right and wrong, gain and loss, cannot enter their hearts and disturb them. To belong to the human species is a small and limited thing; to preserve one’s innate nature on one’s own is what makes one seem vast.

Huizi asked Zhuangzi, “Can a person really be without emotions?” Zhuangzi replied, “Yes.” Huizi said, “If someone is a person, how can you say they have no emotions?” Zhuangzi replied, “The Dao gives people their appearance, and Heaven gives them their form. How could we not call them people?” Huizi asked again, “Since we call them people, how can they be without emotions?” Zhuangzi said, “By ‘emotion,’ I do not mean what you understand by that word. When I say ‘without emotion,’ I mean that people do not injure themselves inwardly because of likes and dislikes. They always follow what is natural and do not deliberately add to life.”

Huizi asked, “If you do not deliberately add to life, how can you preserve this body?” Zhuangzi replied, “The Dao gives people their appearance, and Heaven gives them their form. Do not let likes and dislikes injure you inwardly. Now you wear out your spirit and exhaust your vital energy, leaning against a tree as you chant and bending over a withered paulownia zither in deep thought. Heaven gave you this form, yet you use it to argue over the ‘hardness and whiteness’ thesis.” The ‘hardness and whiteness’ thesis was a topic in Huizi’s school of disputation, exploring whether concepts such as hardness and whiteness could be separated from one another.

南华真经卷之二内篇宗师第六知天之所为,知人之所为者,至矣。知天之所为者,天而生也;知人之所为者,经卷之二内篇宗师第六知天之所为,知人之所为者,至矣。知天之所为者,天而生也;知人之所为者,以其知之所知以养其知之所不知,终其天年而不中道夭者,是知之盛也。虽然,有患。夫知有所待而后当,其所待者特未定也。庸诅知吾所谓天之非人乎?所谓人之非天乎?且有真人而后有真知。何谓真人?古之真人不逆寡,,不雄成,不谟士。若然者,过而弗悔,当而自得也。若然者,登高不栗,入水不濡,入火不热。是知之能登假於道也若此。古之真人,其寝不梦,其觉无忧,其食不甘,其息深深。真人之息以踵,众人之息以喉。屈服者,其隘言若哇。其嗜欲深者,其天机浅。古之真人,不知悦生,不知恶死;其出不欣,其入不距;鲦然而往,偷然而来而已矣。不忘其浅。古之真人,不知悦生,不知恶死;其出不欣,其入不距;鲦然而往,偷然而来而已矣。不忘其所始,不求其所终;受而喜之,忘而复之二是之谓不以心捐道,不以人助天。是之谓真人。若然者,其心志,其容寂,其颗俯;赓然似秋,暖然似春,喜怒通四时,与物有宜而莫知其极。故圣人之用兵也,亡国而不失人心;
Interpretation

To understand what is done by nature and what is done by human effort is to reach a high level. To understand what is done by nature is to live in accord with one’s inborn nature. To understand what is done by human effort is to use what one already knows to nourish what one does not yet understand, and to live out one’s allotted years without dying prematurely. This may be called the pinnacle of knowledge.

Yet there is still a danger here: knowledge needs some basis on which to judge what is appropriate, but that basis may not be certain. How can we be sure that what I call “Heaven” is not “the human,” or that what I call “the human” is not “Heaven”? Only when there are Realized Persons—those who live in accord with the Dao—can there be true understanding.

What is a Realized Person? The Realized Persons of old did not reject the few, boast of their achievements, or seek power. Such people felt no regret even when they made a mistake, and were at ease when they acted appropriately. They could climb heights without fear, enter water without getting wet, and pass through fire without feeling heat. This means their wisdom had penetrated the Dao and reached such a state.

The Realized Persons of old did not dream in sleep, and woke without worry. They ate without craving flavors, and their breathing was deep and prolonged. Their breath seemed to rise from their heels, while ordinary people breathed only from the throat. Those who are oppressed and constrained breathe in short gasps and make sounds like retching. The deeper one’s desires, the shallower one’s inborn spiritual nature.

The Realized Persons of old did not deliberately cling to life or despise death. They did not rejoice at birth or resist death. They came and went naturally, never forgetting life’s source and never fixating on its end. They welcomed life when it came and returned to nature when it departed. This is called not letting self-interest harm the Dao, and not using human effort to assist nature. Such people are Realized Persons.

Their minds were focused, their faces calm, and their expressions humble. At times they were as austere as autumn; at other times, as warm as spring. Their joy and anger shifted with the four seasons, and they lived in harmony with all things. Yet no one could fathom the limits of their state. Thus, when a sage waged war and brought an enemy state to ruin, he did not lose the people’s hearts.

利泽施乎万世,不为爱人。故乐通物,非圣人也;有亲,非仁也;天时,非贤也;利害不通,非君子也;行名失已,非士也;亡身不真,非役人也。若狐不偕、务光、伯夷、叔齐、箕子、胥余、纪他、申徒狄,是役人之役,适人之适,而不自适其适者也。古之真人,其状义而不朋,若不足而不承;与乎其若狐不偕、务光、伯夷、叔齐、箕子、胥余、纪他、申徒狄,是役人之役,适人之适,而不自适其适者也。古之真人,其状义而不朋,若不足而不承;与乎其瓤而不坚也,张乎其虚而不华也,郦邮乎其似喜乎,崔乎其不得已乎。擒乎进我色也,与乎止我德也;厉乎其似世乎。警乎其未可制也;连乎其似好闭也,悦乎忘其言也。以刑为体,以礼为翼,以知为时,以德为循。以刑为体者,掉乎其杀也;以礼为翼者,所以行於世也;以知为时者,不得已於事也;以德为循者,言其与有足者至於丘也,而人真以为勤行者也。故其好之也一,其沸好之也行於世也;以知为时者,不得已於事也;以德为循者,言其与有足者至於丘也,而人真以为勤行者也。故其好之也一,其沸好之也一。其一也一,其不一也一。其一与天为徒,其不一与人为徒。天与人不相胜也,是之谓真人。死生,命也,其有夜旦之常,天也。
Interpretation

Their beneficence extends to all generations, yet it does not arise from favoring any one person. Simply delighting in communion with all things does not make one a sage; showing affection only to certain people does not make one benevolent; following the seasons does not make one worthy; failing to understand changes in fortune and misfortune does not make one a gentleman. Losing oneself for the sake of fame does not make one a man of integrity. And one who cannot preserve their authentic self, yet sets about directing others, is not a True Person.

Fox Buxie, Wuguang, Boyi, Shuqi, Jizi, Xuyu, Jita, and Shentu Di all labored for others and catered to their pursuits, without following their own nature and finding ease in it.

The True Persons of antiquity carried themselves with dignity, yet formed no cliques for private advantage. They seemed to lack something, yet accepted no outside replenishment. They went along with all things, without becoming rigid or hard. Their minds were open, but they made no display of worldly splendor. Their expressions were relaxed, as if joyful, yet they also seemed quiet, as though they had no choice. They behaved with care, as if examining their own appearance; they acted with ease, as though De (Virtue/Power) flowed forth of itself. They were grave and upright, seeming able to live among ordinary people; alert, yet unconfined; continuous and unhurried, as if unwilling to close themselves off; cheerful and content, as if they had forgotten how to speak.

They took penal law as the foundation of governance, ritual as an aid to conduct, wisdom as a means of grasping the moment, and De as their guiding principle. They made penal law their foundation because they understood the need for caution in punishment and execution. They used ritual as an aid so they could move among the world. They used wisdom to grasp the moment because some affairs must be handled out of necessity. To take De as their guiding principle means that they moved alongside those of ability, climbing the hills, while people truly believed they were deliberately striving to cultivate themselves.

Thus, what they loved remained constant, and what they disliked also remained constant; their unity and difference alike returned to the One. In their unity with the One, they kept company with the Dao of Heaven; in their manifestation of difference, they responded to the human world. When the Dao of Heaven and human affairs do not obstruct one another, this is called being a True Person.

Human death and birth are determined by fate, just as the alternation of day and night follows a fixed order. They are part of nature’s arrangement.

人之有所不得与,皆物之情也。彼特以天为父,而身犹爱之,而况其卓乎。人特以有君为愈乎已,而身犹死之,而况其真乎。泉涸,鱼相与处於陆,相吻以湿,相濡以沫,不如相忘於.江湖。与其誉尧而非桀也,不如两忘而化其道。夫大块载我以形,劳我以生,佚我以老,息我以死。故善吾生者,乃所以喜吾死也。夫藏舟非桀也,不如两忘而化其道。夫大块载我以形,劳我以生,佚我以老,息我以死。故善吾生者,乃所以喜吾死也。夫藏舟於壑,藏山於泽,谓之固矣。然而夜半有力者负之而走,昧者不知也。藏小大有宜,犹有所迟。若夫藏天下於天下而不得所迟,是怕物之大情也。特犯人之形而犹喜之,若人之形者,万化之未始有极也,其为乐可胜计邪?故圣人将游於物之所不得迟而皆存。善夭善老,善始善终,人犹效之,又况万物之所系而一化之所待乎。夫道有情有信,无为无形;可传而不可受,可得而不可见;自本自根,未有天地,自古以固存;神鬼神帝,生天生地;在太极之先而不为高,在六极之下而不为深,先天地生而不为久,长於上古而不为老。生地;在太极之先而不为高,在六极之下而不为深,先天地生而不为久,长於上古而不为老。稀韦氏得之,以挈天地,伏牺氏得之,以袭气母;
Interpretation

There are things people cannot accomplish simply because things are as they are. People regard Heaven only as a father, yet still cherish their own bodies; how much more so should they cherish that surpassingly transcendent presence that is Heaven? People think only that a ruler is more capable than they are, yet are willing to give their lives for him; how much more so for the true Dao (the Way)?

When a spring dries up, the fish are stranded together on land. All they can do is moisten one another with their breath and dampen one another with their spit. Better to forget one another in rivers and lakes. Rather than praise Yao and condemn Jie, it is better to forget such distinctions and live in accord with the transformations of the Dao.

Heaven and Earth gave me form, make me toil through living, grant me ease in old age, and give me rest in death. To treat life well, then, also means being able to welcome death.

To hide a boat in a valley and a mountain in a marsh seems secure enough. Yet in the night, a strong person might carry them off without anyone noticing. Even when things of different sizes are hidden in suitable places, they may still be taken. But if all the things under Heaven are hidden within the world itself, where nothing can be taken away from its hiding place, then things accord with their true condition.

When people happen to acquire human form, they rejoice in it. Yet human form is only one among the transformations of the myriad things, and transformation never ends. How could the joy in this ever be fully measured? Thus the sage roams in a realm where the myriad things cannot be possessed and each exists in its own way. They face premature death and longevity, beginnings and endings, with equanimity. If even ordinary people take them as models, how much more so should they take as their model the Dao on which all things depend and through which all things transform?

The Dao is real and has a basis that can be trusted, yet it acts on nothing and has no form. It can be communicated, but cannot be handed over like an object; it can be experienced, but cannot be seen. It takes itself as its root and existed before Heaven and Earth came into being. It has been so from ancient times. It gives spirits their numinous power and makes the celestial sovereign divine; it generates Heaven and Earth. It is prior to the Taiji (the primordial state before Heaven and Earth separated), yet is not high; it is beneath the four directions of Heaven and Earth, yet is not deep. It was born before Heaven and Earth, yet is not ancient; it existed before the remotest antiquity, yet is not old.

Xiweishi obtained the Dao and used it to govern Heaven and Earth. Fuxi obtained the Dao and used it to connect with the source of Qi (vital energy).

维斗得之,终古不武;日月得之,终古不息;堪坏得之,以袭昆仑;冯夷得之,以游大川;肩吾得之,以处太山;黄帝得之,以登云天;颛顼得之,以处玄宫;禺强得之,立乎北极;西王母得之,坐乎少广。莫知其始,莫知其终。彭祖得之,上及有虞,下及五伯;传说得之,以相武丁,奄有天下,乘束维,骑箕尾,而比於列星。南伯子葵问乎女偶曰:子之年长矣,而色若孺子,何也?曰:吾闻道矣。南伯子葵曰:道可得学耶?曰:恶。恶可。子非其人也。夫卜梁倚有圣人之才而无圣人之道,我,而色若孺子,何也?曰:吾闻道矣。南伯子葵曰:道可得学耶?曰:恶。恶可。子非其人也。夫卜梁倚有圣人之才而无圣人之道,我有圣人之道而无圣人之才,吾欲以教之,庶几其果为圣人乎。不然,以圣人之道告圣人之才,亦易矣。吾犹守而告之,参日而后能外天下;已外天下矣,吾又守之,七日而后能外物;已外物矣,吾又守之,九日而后能外生;已外生矣,而后能朝彻;朝彻,而后能见独;见独,而后有无古今;无古今,而后能入於不死不生。杀生者不死,生生者不生。其为物,无不将也,无不迎也;无不毁也;无不成也。其名为樱宁。樱宁也者,樱而后成者也。南伯子葵曰:子独恶乎闻之?
Interpretation

When the Northern Dipper received the Dao (the Way), it never again flaunted its might. When the sun and moon received the Dao, they moved on without end. Kanhuai received the Dao and was able to roam the Kunlun Mountains; Fengyi received the Dao and was able to wander the great river; Jianwu received the Dao and was able to dwell on Mount Tai; the Yellow Emperor received the Dao and was able to ascend into the clouds; Zhuanxu received the Dao and was able to dwell in a deep palace; Yuqiang received the Dao and took his place at the North Pole; the Queen Mother of the West received the Dao and sat peacefully on Mount Shaoguang. No one knows when this Dao began, and no one knows when it will end.

Pengzu received the Dao and lived from the ancient time of the Youyu clan through the Spring and Autumn period of the Five Hegemons. Fu Yue received the Dao and assisted King Wuding of the Shang, bringing all under Heaven under Shang rule. Later, he rode the celestial river between the stars Ji and Wei, mounted those two stars, and took his place among the constellations.

Nanbo Zikui asked Nü’ou, “You are already very old, yet your face looks like a child’s. Why is that?” Nü’ou replied, “I have heard the Dao.” Nanbo Zikui asked, “Can the Dao be learned?” She answered, “No, it cannot. You are not the right person for it. Boliang Yi had the qualities to become a sage, but he did not understand the Dao that sages grasp. I understand the Dao that sages grasp, but I do not have the qualities to become a sage. I wanted to teach him the Dao; perhaps he really could become a sage. It would be easier to tell the Dao of sages to someone who already has the qualities of a sage.”

“I kept to the Dao as I taught him. After three days, he was able to put the world outside his heart and stop worrying about it. Once he had done that, I kept to the Dao and taught him further. After seven days, he was able to put external things outside his heart. Once he had done that, I kept to the Dao and taught him further. After nine days, he was able to put life and death outside his heart. Once he had done this, his mind became clear and lucid as the morning light. When his mind was clear, he could see the Dao standing apart from all things. Once he saw the Dao, he could transcend the distinctions between past and present. Having transcended past and present, he could enter a realm beyond the limits of life and death.”

“The power that brings all things to death does not itself die; the power that enables all things to grow is itself not born. The Dao acts upon all things: there is nothing it does not send on its way and welcome as it arrives; nothing it does not cause to decay, and nothing it does not bring to completion. This state is called yingning, tranquility amid disturbance. Yingning is the state in which all things gradually come to completion amid turmoil and change.”

Nanbo Zikui asked, “From whom did you hear these teachings?”

曰:闻诸副墨之子,副墨之子闻诸洛诵之孙,洛诵之孙闻之瞻明,瞻明闻之聂许,聂许闻之需役,需役闻之於枢,於枢闻之玄冥,玄冥闻之参寥,墨之子,副墨之子闻诸洛诵之孙,洛诵之孙闻之瞻明,瞻明闻之聂许,聂许闻之需役,需役闻之於枢,於枢闻之玄冥,玄冥闻之参寥,参寥闻之疑始。子祀、子舆、子犁、子来四人相与语曰:孰能以无为首,以生为脊,以死为尸,孰知死生存亡之一体者,吾与之友矣。四人相视而笑,莫逆於心,遂相与为友。俄而子舆有病,子祀往问之。曰:伟哉。夫造物者,将以子为此拘拘也。曲凄发背,上有五管,顺隐於齐,肩高於顶,句赘指天。阴阳之气有沙,其心闲而无事,鉼踪而鉴于井。曰:嗟乎。夫造物者又将以予为此拘拘也。子祀曰:汝恶之乎?曰:亡,予何恶?浸假而化予之左臂以为鸡,予因以求时夜;浸假而化予之右臂以为弹,予因以求鹊炙。浸假而化予之尸以为轮,以神为马,予因而乘之,岂更驾哉。且夫得者,时也;失者,顺也;安时而处顺,一及乐不能入也。此古之所谓马,予因而乘之,岂更驾哉。且夫得者,时也;失者,顺也;安时而处顺,一及乐不能入也。此古之所谓县解也,而不能自解者,物有结之。且夫物不胜天久矣,吾又何恶焉?
Interpretation

Some say, “I heard this teaching from the Son of Copying Ink. The Son of Copying Ink heard it from the Grandson of Repeated Chanting; the Grandson of Repeated Chanting heard it from Clear Sight; Clear Sight heard it from Whispered Permission; Whispered Permission heard it from Attending to Service; Attending to Service heard it from the Pivot of Darkness; the Pivot of Darkness heard it from Mysterious Obscurity; Mysterious Obscurity heard it from the Vast Expanse; and the Vast Expanse heard it from the Doubtful Beginning.” These names carry symbolic meanings, tracing how the teaching passes from one level to the next, back to a deep and hidden origin.

Zisi, Ziyu, Zili, and Zilai were gathered together talking. “Who can take ‘nothingness’ as his head, ‘life’ as his spine, and ‘death’ as his body, and understand that life, death, existence, and extinction are all one? We would gladly be friends with him.” The four looked at one another and laughed, their hearts in accord, and so they became friends.

Before long, Ziyu fell ill, and Zisi went to visit him. Ziyu’s back had become hunched, his internal organs had shifted, his face had sunk into his belly, his shoulders had risen above his head, and his neck bones stuck out, pointing toward the sky. The Yin-Yang energies were no longer flowing freely, and his body had become like this. Yet his mind remained at ease, free of distress, and he could still calmly gaze at his reflection in a well. He exclaimed, “How marvelous! The Creator has made me so bent and twisted.”

Zisi asked, “Do you hate how you look?” Ziyu replied, “No. What is there for me to hate? If transformation gradually turned my left arm into a rooster, I would use it to announce the dawn; if it turned my right arm into a crossbow, I would use it to shoot a bird and roast it for supper. If it turned my body into a wheel and my spirit into a horse, I would ride on them—why would I need another carriage?”

“To receive something is a matter of the moment; to lose it is also something to follow naturally. Be at peace with the seasons and follow transformation, and neither sorrow nor joy can enter the heart. This is what the ancients called ‘release by hanging’—freedom from entanglement. Those who cannot free themselves are caught up in external things. External things cannot overcome the Dao of Heaven; it has always been so. What, then, is there for me to hate?”

俄而子来有病,喘喘然将死,其妻子环而泣之。犁往问之,曰:叱。避。无但化。倚其户与之语曰:伟哉造化。又将奚以汝为,将奚以汝适?以汝为鼠肝乎?以汝为虫臂乎?子来曰:父母於子,束西南北,唯命之从,阴阳於人,不翅於父母;彼近吾死而我不听,我则捍矣,彼何罪焉。夫大块载我以形,劳我以生,佚我以老,息我以死。故善吾生者,乃所以善吾死也。今之大冶铸金,金踊跃日我且必为模邹,大冷必以为不祥之金。今一犯人之形,而日人耳人耳,夫造化者必以为不祥之人。今一以天地为大炉,以造化为大冷,恶乎往而不可哉。成我且必为模邹,大冷必以为不祥之金。今一犯人之形,而日人耳人耳,夫造化者必以为不祥之人。今一以天地为大炉,以造化为大冷,恶乎往而不可哉。成然寐,莲然觉。子桑户、孟子反、子琴张三人相与友,曰:孰能相与於与相与,相为於无相为?孰能登天游雾,挠挑无极,相忘以生,无所终穷?二人相视而笑,莫逆於心,遂相与友。莫然有问而子桑户死,未葬。孔子闻之,使子贡往待事焉。或编曲,或鼓琴,相和而歌曰:嗟来桑户乎。嗟来桑户乎。而已反其真,而我犹为人琦。子贡趋而进曰:敢问临尸而歌,礼乎?二人相视而笑曰:是恶知礼意。
Interpretation

Soon, Zilai fell ill. His breath grew faint, and he seemed close to death. His wife and children gathered around him, weeping. Zili went to visit and scolded them: “Move away. Don’t hinder him from following the changes.” Leaning against the door, he said to Zilai, “How great is the transforming power! What will it turn you into next, and where will it take you? Will it make you into a rat’s liver, or a worm’s arm?”

Zilai said, “Parents arrange things for their children, whether east, west, north, or south, and the children can only obey. Yin and Yang—the forces between Heaven and Earth that bring about the birth, death, and transformation of all things—treat people even more strictly than parents treat their children. They are bringing me close to death. If I refused to obey, I would be resisting them. What fault would that be of theirs? The Earth gave me a body, made me toil while I was alive, gave me ease in old age, and will give me rest after death. So if it treats my life well, it will treat my death well too.

“Now suppose a great metalworker were casting metal. If the metal leapt up and said, ‘I insist on becoming a Moye sword!’ the metalworker would surely regard it as ill-omened metal. I happened to receive a human form. If I were now to say, ‘I want only to be human, only to be human,’ the transforming power would surely regard me as an ill-omened person. Now I take Heaven and Earth as a great furnace and the transforming power as a great metalworker. Where could I go that would not be welcome?”

Zilai fell asleep peacefully and woke peacefully.

Zisanghu, Meng Zifan, and Ziqin Zhang became friends. They said, “Who can be friends with others without being bound by friendship, help one another without deliberately doing anything? Who can climb into the sky and wander among the clouds, roam freely through the boundless expanse, forget life and death, and remain untouched by any end?” Two of them looked at each other and smiled, their hearts in accord, and became friends.

Some time later, Zisanghu died, before he had been buried. When Confucius heard of it, he sent Zigong to help attend to the funeral. Zigong found two men, one weaving a melody and the other playing a zither, singing in response to each other: “Ah, Sanghu! Ah, Sanghu! You have returned to your true nature, while we remain among the living.” Zigong stepped forward and asked, “May I ask whether it accords with the rites to sing while keeping watch over the body?” The two looked at each other and laughed. “How could someone like you understand the true meaning of ritual?”

子贡一反,以告孔子,曰:彼何人者邪?修行无有,而外其形骸,临尸而歌;颜色不变,无以命之。彼何人者邪?孔子曰:彼游方之外者也;而丘,游方之内者也。外内不何人者邪?修行无有,而外其形骸,临尸而歌;颜色不变,无以命之。彼何人者邪?孔子曰:彼游方之外者也;而丘,游方之内者也。外内不相及,而丘使汝往吊之,丘则陋矣。彼方且与造物者为人。而游乎天地之.一气。彼以生为附赘县疣,以死为央疣溃瘫,夫若然者,又恶知死生先后之所在。假於异物,托於同体;忘其肝胆,遗其耳目;反覆终始,不知端倪;芒然彷徨乎尘垢之外,逍遥乎无为之业。彼又恶能债债然为世俗之礼,以观众人之耳目哉。子贡曰:然则夫子何方之依?曰:丘,天之戮民也。虽然,吾与汝共之。子贡曰:敢问其方。孔子曰:鱼相造乎水,人相造乎道。相造乎水者,穿池而养给;相造乎道者,无。子贡曰:敢问其方。孔子曰:鱼相造乎水,人相造乎道。相造乎水者,穿池而养给;相造乎道者,无事而生定。故日,鱼相忘乎江湖,人相忘乎道.术。子贡日.一敢问畸人。曰:畸人者,畸於人而伴於天,故日,天之小人,人之君子;人之君子,天之小人也。颜回问仲尼曰:孟孙才,其母死,哭泣无涕。中心不戚,居丧不哀。
Interpretation

When Zigong returned, he told Confucius what had happened. “Who exactly was that man?” he asked. “He had never studied the rites, yet treated his body as though it meant nothing. Standing beside the dead man, he sang, and his expression did not change. There is simply no way to describe him by ordinary standards. Who was he?”

Confucius said, “He stands beyond worldly conventions, while I live within them. The inner and outer follow different paths. Yet I sent you to offer condolences to him; my understanding was shallow. He has joined himself to the Creator and roams within the single Qi of Heaven and Earth. To him, birth is like a needless growth on the body, and death like that growth bursting and falling away. In that case, how could he know whether death or life comes first? He rests in the common ground of all things, entrusting himself to their changing forms. He forgets the differences between bodily organs such as liver and gall, and does not cling to the senses of ear and eye. Life and death turn in a cycle, and he sees no beginning or end. He wanders freely beyond the dust and grime of worldly life, at ease in the realm of Wuwei (non-action). How could he be bound by worldly rites and perform them for others to see?”

Zigong said, “Then, Master, which path do you follow?” Confucius replied, “It is as though Heaven has punished me and forced me to remain among people. Even so, I will walk this path with you.”

Zigong said, “May I ask what this path is like?” Confucius said, “Fish live by means of water; people live by means of the Dao (the Way). Fish live in water, so people dig ponds and raise them there, giving them water to rely on. When people live by the Dao, they need not act deliberately; their lives settle naturally. Thus fish in rivers and lakes forget one another, and people in the Dao forget one another.”

Zigong said, “May I ask what a ‘different one’—someone unlike ordinary people—is?” Confucius said, “A different one appears unlike others to people, yet keeps company with the Way of Heaven. Thus one who accords with the Way of Heaven may look like a petty person to the world, while someone the world regards as a gentleman may look like a petty person from Heaven’s perspective.”

Yan Hui asked Zhongni, “When Mengsun Cai’s mother died, he wept without tears. His heart was not grieving, and he showed no sorrow during the mourning period.”

无是三者,以善丧盖鲁国。固有无其实而得其名者乎?回壹怪之。仲尼曰:夫孟孙氏尽之矣,进於知矣。唯简之而不得,夫已有所简矣。孟孙氏不知所以生,不知所以死;不知就先,不知就后;若化为物,以待其所不知之化已乎。且方将化,恶知不化哉?方将不化,恶知已化哉?吾特与汝,其梦未始觉者邪。且彼有骇形而无损心,有旦宅而无情死。孟孙氏特觉,人哭亦哭,是自其所以乃。且也相与吾之耳矣,庸诅知吾所谓吾之乎?且汝梦为乌而厉乎天,梦为损心,有旦宅而无情死。孟孙氏特觉,人哭亦哭,是自其所以乃。且也相与吾之耳矣,庸诅知吾所谓吾之乎?且汝梦为乌而厉乎天,梦为鱼而没於渊。不识今之言者,其觉者乎,其梦者乎?造适不及笑,献笑不及排,安.排而去化,乃入於寥天一。意而子见许由。许由曰:尧何以资汝?意而子曰:尧谓我,汝必躬服仁义而明言是非。许由曰:而奚来为?软夫尧既已鲸汝以仁义,而劓汝以是非矣,汝将何以游夫遥荡恣瞧转徒之涂乎?意而子日,虽然,吾愿游於其藩。许由曰:不然。夫盲者无以与乎眉目颜色之好,瞽者无以与乎青黄鲔截之观。意而子曰:夫无庄之徒之涂乎?意而子日,虽然,吾愿游於其藩。许由曰:不然。
Interpretation

“These three things were absent”—that is, those three signs were missing—yet through his good conduct he made the people of Lu grieve. Can someone truly have a fine reputation without the corresponding virtue in practice? Yan Hui found this puzzling.

Confucius said, “Mengsun has already reached this point; we may say he is close to understanding how things work. He wants to see things simply, yet still cannot stop making distinctions altogether. But he has simplified them to some extent. Mengsun does not know where life comes from or where death goes. He does not know whether life comes first or later. He follows change as he becomes one of the myriad things, waiting for changes he does not understand to continue unfolding. Since things are changing now, how can we know they will not change again? And if they are not changing now, how can we know they changed before? You and I, I suspect, are like people who have not yet awakened from a dream.

“The human form may undergo startling changes, but the mind need not be harmed by them. The body is like a temporary dwelling; the passing of the form does not mean that one’s nature and feelings are cut off as well. Mengsun simply woke up a little earlier. When others weep, he weeps with them, going along with the circumstances at hand. Besides, when we are together, each of us takes the other to be ‘me.’ How can we know what this ‘me’ I speak of really is?

“You dream that you become a crow and fly high into the sky; then you dream that you become a fish and sink into the depths. So is the person speaking now awake, or still dreaming? When you truly follow the circumstances, you need not wait until you laugh. Once laughter comes, it is already too late for that unforced ease. Rest calmly in the changes, and you can enter a realm of emptiness and undivided wholeness.”

Yi’er Zhi went to see Xu You. Xu You asked, “What teachings did Yao give you?” Yi’er Zhi said, “Yao told me that I must put benevolence and righteousness into practice myself, and clearly distinguish right from wrong.”

Xu You said, “Then what have you come here for? Alas, Yao has marked you with benevolence and righteousness, and cut you with right and wrong. How can you still roam along that free, unrestrained, ever-changing Way?”

Yi’er Zhi said, “Even so, I still hope to walk along its edges.”

Xu You said, “You cannot. A blind person cannot appreciate the beauty of brows and features, and someone whose eyes are sightless cannot see the colors of blue, yellow, and the like.”

夫盲者无以与乎眉目颜色之好,瞽者无以与乎青黄鲔截之观。意而子曰:夫无庄之失其美,据梁之失其力,黄帝之亡其知,皆在炉锤之问耳。庸诅知夫造物者之不息我鲸而补我劓,使我乘成以随先生邪?许由曰:噫,未可知也。我为汝言其大略。吾师乎,吾师乎,毙万物而不为义,泽及万世而不为仁,长於上古而不为老,覆载天地刻雕众形而不为巧,此所游已。颜回曰:回益矣。仲尼曰:何谓也?曰:回忘仁义矣。曰:可矣,犹未也。他日复见,曰:回益矣。曰:何谓也回益矣。仲尼曰:何谓也?曰:回忘仁义矣。曰:可矣,犹未也。他日复见,曰:回益矣。曰:何谓也?曰:回忘礼乐矣。曰:可矣,犹未也。它日复见,曰:回益矣。曰:何也?曰:回坐忘矣。仲尼蹴然曰:谓坐忘?颜回曰:堕肢体,黜聪明,离形去知,同於大通,此谓坐忘。仲尼曰:同则无好也,化则无常也,而果其贤乎。丘也请从而后也。子兴与子桑友,而淋雨十日。子与曰:子桑殆病矣。裹饭而往食之。至子桑之门,则若歌若哭,鼓琴曰:父邪?母邪?天乎?人乎?有不任其声而趋举其时焉。子与入曰:子之歌时,何故若是?曰:吾思夫使我至此极者而弗得也。父母壴欲吾贫哉?天无私覆,地无私载,天地私贫我哉?求其为之者而不得也。
Interpretation

A blind person cannot appreciate the beauty of brows, eyes, and facial features; nor can someone who cannot see behold the scene of colors such as blue and yellow intermingling. Yi’erzi said, “Wuzhuang lost his beauty, Juliang lost his strength, and the Yellow Emperor lost his wisdom. All of these seem like changes wrought between the fire and the hammer. Who knows whether the Creator—the power that creates and brings all things into being—might not join my severed nose and mend my amputated feet, restoring me to wholeness so that I could follow you and learn?”

Xu You said, “Ah, that is hard to say. Let me tell you, roughly, about my teacher. My teacher, my teacher! He breaks apart the myriad things, yet does not regard this as cruelty; his kindness extends through all ages, yet he does not regard this as benevolence. He has existed since high antiquity, yet does not regard himself as old. He covers and supports Heaven and Earth, and shapes the forms of the myriad things, yet does not regard himself as skilled. This is the realm in which he roams.”

Yan Hui said, “I have made progress.” Confucius asked, “What do you mean?” Yan Hui replied, “I have forgotten benevolence and righteousness.” Confucius said, “That is good, but not enough.” Some days later, Yan Hui came to see Confucius again and said, “I have made progress.” Confucius asked, “What do you mean?” Yan Hui replied, “I have forgotten ritual and music.” Confucius said, “That is good, but not enough.” Some days later, Yan Hui came again and said, “I have made progress.” Confucius asked, “What do you mean?” Yan Hui replied, “I have attained sitting in forgetfulness.” Confucius asked in surprise, “What does sitting in forgetfulness mean?” Yan Hui said, “I forget the sensations of every part of my body, set aside the keen perceptions of my ears and eyes, leave my physical form behind, and let go of discriminating thought. I become one with the Great Dao; this is called sitting in forgetfulness.” Confucius said, “When you become one with the Great Dao, you have no preferences; when you follow change, you do not cling to any fixed state. You have indeed attained the realm of the sage. I would like to follow behind you and learn.”

Ziyu and Zisang were friends. It rained continuously for ten days, and Ziyu said, “Zisang must have fallen ill.” So he wrapped up some food and took it to him. When he reached Zisang’s door, he heard him sounding as if he were weeping and singing, plucking his zither as he sang, “Is it my parents? Is it Heaven? Is it other people?” His voice was subdued, and he sang in broken phrases to the rhythm. Ziyu went inside and asked, “Why are you singing like that?” Zisang said, “I’m wondering what has brought me to this plight, but no matter how I search, I cannot find the answer. Could my parents want me to be poor? Heaven covers all things without partiality, and Earth supports all things without partiality. Could Heaven and Earth single me out for poverty? I try to find the cause of all this, but I cannot.”

然而至此极者,命也夫。 南华真经卷之二内篇应帝王第七啮缺问於王倪,四问而四不知。啮缺因跃而大喜,行而不得也。然而至此极者,命也夫。 南华真经卷之二内篇应帝王第七啮缺问於王倪,四问而四不知。啮缺因跃而大喜,行以告蒲衣子。蒲衣子曰:而乃今知之乎?有虞氏不及泰氏。有虞氏,其犹臧仁以要人,亦得人矣,而未始出於非人。泰氏,其外徐徐,其觉于于,一以己为马,一以己为牛;离何谓非牛徐形去知,同於大通,此谓坐忘。仲尼曰:同则无好也,化则无常也,而果其贤乎。丘也请从而后也。子舆与子桑友,而淋雨十日。子舆曰:子桑殆病矣。裹饭而往食之。至子桑之门,则若歌若哭,鼓琴曰:父邪?母邪?天乎?人乎?有不任其声而趋举其诗焉。子舆入曰:子之歌诗。裹饭而往食之。至子桑之门,则若歌若哭,鼓琴曰:父邪?母邪?天乎?人乎?有不任其声而趋举其诗焉。子舆入曰:子之歌诗,何故若是?曰:吾思夫使我至此极者而弗得也。父母岂欲吾贫哉?天无私覆,地无私载,天地岂私贫我哉?求其为之者而不得也。然而至此极者,命也夫。啮缺问於王倪,四问而四不知。啮缺因跃而大喜,行以告蒲衣子。蒲衣子曰:而乃今知之乎?有虞氏不及,其觉于于,一以己为马,一以己为;其知情信,其德甚真,而未始入於人。肩吾见狂接舆。狂接舆曰:日中始何以语汝?肩吾曰:告我君人者以己出经式义度,人孰敢不听而化诸?
Interpretation

Even if one has pursued the matter this far and reached the limit, one can only say that it was simply fate.

Nie Que sought instruction from Wang Ni, asking him four times. Each time, Wang Ni answered that he did not know. Nie Que was so delighted that he jumped for joy. Later, he told the story to Pu Yi Zi. Pu Yi Zi said, “Only now do you understand this? You Yu Shi, the legendary Shun, was inferior to Tai Shi, a ruler said to have lived in a more ancient age. You Yu Shi kept benevolence in his heart and used it to win people over. Though he did win their hearts, he did not rise above worldly judgments of right and wrong. Tai Shi, by contrast, was calm and at ease, his spirit untroubled. He regarded himself as a horse and as an ox, unbound by fixed identities or distinctions, and followed the unfolding changes of the Great Dao. This is called ‘sitting in forgetfulness’: sitting quietly and forgetting the body and the mind that makes distinctions.”

Confucius said, “Be at one with all things, and you will show no preference. Follow change, and you will cling to nothing as permanent. Are you truly a worthy person? I would like to follow behind you and learn.”

Zi Yu and Zi Sang were friends. It rained for ten days straight, and Zi Yu thought Zi Sang must have fallen ill, so he wrapped up some food and took it to him. When he arrived at Zi Sang’s home, he heard him sounding as if he were weeping and singing at once. Playing the zither, Zi Sang sang, “Is it my father? Is it my mother? Is it Heaven? Is it a person?” His voice seemed strained beyond endurance, and the verses came tumbling from his mouth.

Zi Yu went inside and asked, “Why are you singing so sorrowfully?” Zi Sang replied, “I have tried to discover what has brought me to such hardship, but I cannot find the answer. Would my parents really want me to be poor? Heaven has no private interests; it does not shelter only some people. Earth has no private interests; it does not support only some people. Would Heaven and Earth really want me to be poor? I cannot find any ruler responsible for all this. Yet I have reached such an extreme. Perhaps this is simply my fate.”

Nie Que sought instruction from Wang Ni, asking him four times. Each time, Wang Ni said he did not know. Nie Que was so delighted that he jumped for joy, and later told Pu Yi Zi. Pu Yi Zi said, “Only now do you understand? You Yu Shi was inferior to Tai Shi. Tai Shi was at ease in spirit and regarded himself as a horse and as an ox. His understanding was sincere and trustworthy, and his De was utterly pure, yet he never clung to the artificial standards imposed by the world.”

Shoulder Wu visited Madman Jie Yu. Jie Yu asked, “What did Ri Zhong Shi tell you?” Shoulder Wu replied, “He told me that if a ruler takes himself as the measure and establishes rules, laws, and principles of right conduct, who would dare not obey and be transformed by his influence?”

狂接舆曰:是欺德也,其於治天下也,犹涉海凿河而使蚤负山也。夫圣人之治也,治外乎?正而后行,碗乎能其事者而已矣。且乌高飞以避缯其於治天下也,犹涉海凿河而使蚤负山也。夫圣人之治也,治外乎?正而后行,碗乎能其事者而已矣。且乌高飞以避缯弋之害,鼹鼠深穴乎神丘之下,以避黑凿之患,而曾二虫之无知。天根游於殷阳,至寥水之上,适遭无名人而问焉,曰:请问为天下。无名人曰:去,汝鄙人也,何问之不豫也。予方将与造物者为人,厌,则又乘夫莽眇之乌,以出六极之外,而游无何有之乡,以处圹垠之野。汝又何闹以治天下感予之心为?又复问。无名人曰:汝游心於淡,合气於漠,顺物自然而无容私焉,而天下治矣。阳子居见老聪,曰:有人於此,向疾强梁,物彻疏明,学道不倦。如是者,可比明王乎?老聘曰:是於圣人也,胥易技系,劳形休心者也。且也虎豹之文来田,暖狙之便执厘之狗来藉。如是疏明,学道不倦。如是者,可比明王乎?老聘曰:是於圣人也,胥易技系,劳形休心者也。且也虎豹之文来田,暖狙之便执厘之狗来藉。如是者,可比明王乎?阳子居蹴然曰:敢问明王之治。老聘曰:明王之功盖天下而似不自己,化贷万物而民弗恃;有莫举名,使物自喜;
Interpretation

Kuang Jieyu said, “This goes against De (Virtue/Power). Governing the world in this way is like trying to cross the sea on foot, digging a channel through a river, or making a tiny insect carry a mountain. Does a sage govern the world by controlling external things? First set yourself right, then act: this is simply doing well what lies within your power. Birds fly high to avoid nets and arrows; moles burrow deep beneath the sacred hill to escape the danger of digging. If even they know how to avoid harm, how much more should people?”

Tiangen was traveling in Yinyang when he came to the banks of the Liao River and happened upon a nameless man. He asked, “May I ask how to govern the world?” The nameless man replied, “Go away! You are so shallow—how can you ask such an untimely question? I am about to wander with the Creator. When I grow weary, I ride the misty, formless Qi (vital energy) and fly beyond the four quarters of heaven and earth, traveling through the realm of nothingness and dwelling in the boundless wilderness. Why bring the affairs of governing the world to disturb my mind?” Tiangen pressed him further. The nameless man said, “Let the spirit roam in stillness and ease, let the breath accord with emptiness and quiet, and follow the natural transformations of all things without inserting private intentions. Then the world can be at peace.”

Yang Juzi paid a visit to Lao Dan and said, “There is a person who acts swiftly and is strong-willed, who sees things clearly and notices the smallest details, and who studies the Dao (the Way) without ever slackening. Could such a person be compared with an enlightened ruler?” Lao Dan replied, “In the eyes of a sage, such a person is merely driven by affairs and bound by skills, his body worn out and his spirit exhausted. Besides, tigers and leopards are hunted for their beautiful coats, monkeys are captured for their agility, and hounds are put to work for their hunting skill. Even if this person is intelligent, sharp-eyed, and tireless in study, how could he compare with an enlightened ruler?”

With a respectful expression, Yang Juzi asked, “May I ask how an enlightened ruler governs?” Lao Dan said, “The enlightened ruler’s accomplishments extend throughout the world, yet seem not to come from him. His kindness nurtures all things, yet the people do not depend on him. He does not deliberately make his name known; all things happily find their own fulfillment.”

立乎不测,而游於无有者也。郑有神巫日季咸,知人之死生存亡、祸福寿夭,期以岁月旬日,若神。郑人见之,皆弃而走。列子见之而心醉,归以告壶子,曰:始吾以夫子之道为至矣,则又有至焉者矣。壶子曰:吾与汝既其文,未既其实,而固得道与?众雄而无雄,而又奚卯焉。而以遁与世亢,必信,夫故使人得而相汝。尝试与来,以予示之。明日,列子与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:嘻,子之先生死矣,弗活矣,不以旬数矣,吾见怪焉,见湿灰焉。列子入,泣涕沾襟以告壶子。壶子曰:局明日,列子与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:嘻,子之先生死矣,弗活矣,不以旬数矣,吾见怪焉,见湿灰焉。列子入,泣涕沾襟以告壶子。壶子曰:局吾示之以地文,萌乎不震不正,是殆见吾杜德机也。尝□又与来。明日,又与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:幸矣,子之先生遇我也。有廖矣,全然有生矣,吾见其杜权矣9列子入,以告壶子。壶子曰:易吾示之以天壤,名实不入,而机发於踵。是殆见吾善者机也。尝又与来。明日,又与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:子之先生不齐,吾无得而相焉。试齐,且复相之。
Interpretation

To stand grounded in a realm beyond knowing, and roam freely amid what has neither form nor trace.

In the state of Zheng there was a spirit medium named Jixian. He could foresee a person’s death or survival, good or ill fortune, and the length of their life. He could also determine the year, month, and day when his predictions would come true, as though he were a spirit. When the people of Zheng saw him, they dropped whatever they were doing and hurried away. Liezi, however, was fascinated by him. He went back and told Huchu, “I thought your Dao had reached its highest point, sir. I never imagined there could be a realm beyond it.”

Huchu said, “I have shown you only the outward appearances of the Dao; I have not yet passed on its true substance. And you already think you have attained the Dao? All things seem to display their own strength, yet none truly claim to be strong. So what fixed traces could there be for divination to read? If you reveal your traces and contend with the world, others will naturally be able to see through your appearance. Bring Jixian here. I’ll show myself to him.”

The next day, Liezi brought Jixian to meet Huchu. Afterward, Jixian said to Liezi, “Alas, your teacher is close to death. He will not live much longer. I saw a strange sign, like damp ashes.” Liezi went inside. Weeping until his tears soaked his lapels, he told Huchu what Jixian had said.

Huchu said, “Just now, what I showed him was ‘Earth’s Pattern’—the still, unmoving state of the earth. My breath seemed weak and without fluctuation. He probably saw signs of my Virtue hidden away. Bring him again.”

On the third day, Jixian saw Huchu once more. Afterward, he said, “Fortunately, your teacher met me. His illness has already improved; he is full of life. I saw signs of life being concealed, on the verge of transformation.” Liezi went inside and told Huchu.

Huchu said, “Just now, what I showed him was ‘Heaven and Earth’s Open Expanse,’ the natural transformations unfolding between heaven and earth. Neither reputation nor outward appearance can enter it. Life stirs from the heels. He probably saw the life force in me that is skilled at transformation. Bring him again.”

On the fourth day, Jixian saw Huchu once more. Afterward, he said, “Your teacher’s vital energy keeps changing. I can’t see through it. Once it settles, I’ll read his features for you.” Liezi went inside and told Huchu.

列子入,以殆见吾善者机也。尝又与来。明日,又与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:子之先生不齐,吾无得而相焉。试齐,且复相之。列子入,以告壶子。壶子曰:吾辱示之以太冲莫胜。是殆见吾衡气机也。貌梧之审为渊,止水之审为渊,流水之审为渊。渊有九名,此处三焉。尝又与来。明日,又与之见壶子。立未定,自失而走。壶子曰:追之。列子追之不及,反以报壶子曰:已灭矣,已失矣,吾弗及已。壶子曰:易吾示之以未始出吾宗。吾与之虚而委蛇,不知其谁何,因以为弟#1靡,因以为波流,故逃也。然后列子自以为未始学而归,三年不出。为其妻爨,食豕如虚而委蛇,不知其谁何,因以为弟#1靡,因以为波流,故逃也。然后列子自以为未始学而归,三年不出。为其妻爨,食豕如食人,於事无与亲,雕豕复朴,块然独以其形立。纷而封哉,一以是终。无为名尸,无为谋府;无为事任,无为知主。体尽无穷,而游无朕;尽其所受乎天,而无见得,亦虚而已。至人之用心若镜,不将不迎,应而不藏,故能胜物而不伤。南海之帝为鲦,北海之帝为忽,中央之帝为浑沌。鲦与忽时相与遇於浑沌之地,浑沌待之甚善。鲦与忽谋报浑沌之德,曰:人皆有七窍以视听食息,此独无有,尝试凿之。日凿一窍,七日而浑沌死。
Interpretation

When Liezi went in, he told the Pot Master what had just happened. The Pot Master said, “Just now I showed him the Great Equilibrium, a state of utter stillness and harmony, so he could not grasp me. Perhaps he saw one aspect of the balance in the movement of my Qi.”

A person’s expression can seem deep, like an abyss. Still water can seem deep, like an abyss. Flowing water can also seem deep, like an abyss. There are nine kinds of abyss; here, three are mentioned. Bring him to see me once more.

The next day, Liezi brought the man to see the Pot Master again. Before he had even found his footing, the man panicked and fled. The Pot Master said, “Hurry after him.” Liezi could not catch up. When he returned, he reported, “He has vanished. He has run far away, and I could not catch him.”

The Pot Master said, “Just now I changed my approach and let him see that I had never left my original state. I responded to change with stillness and emptiness, swaying with it like water plants in the current, so he could not make out what I was. I also changed with the current, following its course. That is why he fled.”

From then on, Liezi felt that he had not truly learned anything before. He went home and stayed indoors for three years. He cooked over the fire for his wife and fed the pigs as though he were serving guests. He showed no partiality or preference in dealing with things. He let his outward adornments return to simplicity and rested securely within his physical form. Amid ceaseless change, he held fast to this until the end of his life.

Do not serve as a figurehead for fame or a storehouse for schemes. Do not shoulder the burdens of affairs or regard yourself as the master of wisdom. Let body and mind merge with endless change, and roam in a realm without trace. Fulfill what Heaven has bestowed without thinking you have gained anything; this is simply stillness and emptiness. The Perfect Person’s mind is like a mirror: it does not go out to welcome things, nor does it deliberately turn them away. Things arrive, and it reflects them as they are; when they pass, it keeps nothing. Thus it can respond to all things without being harmed.

The ruler of the South Sea was called Shu, the ruler of the North Sea was called Hu, and the ruler of the Center was called Hundun. Shu and Hu often met in Hundun’s domain, and Hundun treated them well. Shu and Hu discussed how to repay his kindness. “Everyone has seven openings for seeing, hearing, eating, and breathing,” they said, “but he alone has none. Let us try to bore them for him.” Each day they bored one opening. On the seventh day, Hundun died.

南华真经卷之二外篇骈拇第八骈拇枝指,出乎性哉,而侈於德;附赘县疣,出乎形哉,而侈於性。多方乎仁义而用之者,列於五脏哉,而非道德之正也。是故骈於足者,连无用之肉也;枝於手者疣,出乎形哉,而侈於性。多方乎仁义而用之者,列於五脏哉,而非道德之正也。是故骈於足者,连无用之肉也;枝於手者,树无用之指也;多方骈枝於五脏之情者,淫僻於仁义之行,而多方於聪明之用也。是故骈於明者,乱五色,淫文章,青黄鲔截之煌煌非乎?而离朱是已。多於聪者,乱五声,淫六律,金石丝竹黄锺大吕之声非乎?而师旷是已。枝於仁者,擢德塞性以收名声,使天下簧鼓以奉不及之法非乎?而曾史是已。骈於辩者,景瓦结绳窜句,擢德塞性以收名声,使天下簧鼓以奉不及之法非乎?而曾史是已。骈於辩者,景瓦结绳窜句,游心於坚白同异之问,而敝珪誉无用之言非乎?而杨墨是已。故此皆多骈旁枝之道,非天下之至正也。彼正正者,不失其性命之情。故合者不为骈,而枝者不为歧;长者不为有余,短者不为不足。是故亮经虽短,续之则忧;鹤陉虽长,断之则悲。故性长非所断,性短非所续,无所去忧也。意仁义其非人情乎?彼仁人#2何其多忧也?且夫骈於拇者,庾之.则泣;枝於F手者,龄之则啼。
Interpretation

Toes joined together and an extra finger on the hand are shapes one is born with, yet they go beyond the body’s ordinary form. Flesh growths and warts on the body are likewise excesses of physical form. Treating benevolence and righteousness as a set of many rules to be applied at every turn is like forcing them into people’s hearts; this is not the natural, authentic state of morality.

Joined toes are a useless piece of flesh that has grown together; a forked finger is an extra, useless finger. When people’s hearts are constrained by too many rules of benevolence and righteousness, their conduct departs from their nature. Excessive use of cleverness, too, becomes a burden.

Excessive eyesight can unsettle the five colors and lead one to become absorbed in elaborate patterns. Is this not like Li Zhu, the legendary man of extraordinary vision? Excessive hearing can unsettle the five tones and lead one to become absorbed in the six pitch standards of ancient music, pursuing the sounds of bells, stone chimes, silk strings, and bamboo flutes, as well as pitches such as Huangzhong and Dalu. Is this not like Shi Kuang, the musician of the Spring and Autumn period famed for discerning sounds? By excessively extolling benevolence and righteousness, people elevate moral conduct and stifle their nature, seeking fame and stirring the world to follow standards that are difficult to meet. Zeng Shen and Shi Qiu, both renowned for their virtue, were examples of this. Excessive pursuit of debate leads people to become absorbed in sophistries about the hard and white, sameness and difference, exhausting their minds to praise useless words. Yang Zhu and Mo Di were examples of this.

All these add branches and complications beyond one’s nature; they are not the most proper Dao in the world. The state that truly accords with what is natural is one in which the innate feelings and nature of life are not lost. Toes joined from birth are not an excess, and fingers apart from one another are not a forked growth. What is long is not extra, and what is short is not deficient. Thus, when the channels are naturally short, forcing them to lengthen brings distress; when a crane’s legs are naturally long, forcing them to be cut short brings sorrow. What is naturally long should not be cut short, and what is naturally short should not be lengthened. Then there is no such distress. Are benevolence and righteousness not also part of human nature? Why, then, do those who proclaim benevolence and righteousness suffer so much distress? People born with joined toes weep when someone insists on separating them; those born with an extra finger on the hand cry when someone insists on cutting it off.

二者或有余於数,或不足於数,其於忧一也。今世之仁人,蒿目而忧世之患;不仁之人,央性命之情而饕贵富。故意仁义其非人情乎?自三代以下者,天下何其嚣嚣也?且夫待钩绳规患;不仁之人,央性命之情而饕贵富。故意仁义其非人情乎?自三代以下者,天下何其嚣嚣也?且夫待钩绳规矩而正者,是削其性也,待绳约胶漆而固者,是侵其德也;屈折礼乐,吻俞仁义,以慰天下之心者,此失其常然也,天下有常然。常然者,曲者不以钩,直者不以绳,圆者不以规,方者不矩,附离不以胶漆,约束不以缠索。故天下诱然皆生而不知其所以生,同焉皆得而不知其所以得。故古今不二,不可亏也,则仁义又奚连连如胶漆缠索而游乎道德之问为哉?使天下惑也。夫小惑易方,大惑易性。何以知其然邪?自虞氏招仁义以挠天下也,天下莫不奔命於仁义,是非奚连连如胶漆缠索而游乎道德之问为哉?使天下惑也。夫小惑易方,大惑易性。何以知其然邪?自虞氏招仁义以挠天下也,天下莫不奔命於仁义,是非以仁义易其性与?故尝试论之,自三代以下者,天下莫不以物易其性矣。小人则以身殉利,士则以身殉名,大夫则以身殉家,圣人则以身殉天下。故此数子者,事业不同,名声异号,其於伤性以身为殉,一也。
Interpretation

Some people calculate a surplus, while others come up short, yet they worry alike. Today, those who uphold benevolence and righteousness look anxiously upon the troubles of the world. Those who do not uphold them, however, indulge their natural impulses and wear down their lives, intent only on grasping at wealth and status. Does the Way of benevolence and righteousness truly accord with human nature? Why has the world become so turbulent since the Three Dynasties of Xia, Shang, and Zhou?

To correct things with a carpenter’s square, an ink line, and a compass is to diminish their nature. To fasten them with ropes, glue, and lacquer is to injure their inherent De. To impose ritual and music and proclaim benevolence and righteousness in order to pacify people’s hearts is likewise to make them lose their original state. All things in the world have their own natural state: what is crooked needs no square, what is straight needs no ink line, what is round needs no compass, and what is square needs no carpenter’s square. Things adhere to one another without glue or lacquer, and connect without being bound by ropes.

Thus all things in the world grow naturally, without knowing why they grow; they receive the vitality they share, without knowing how they receive it. The natural Dao has been the same in ancient and present times, and should not be damaged. So why must benevolence and righteousness cling to De like glue and ropes? They only confuse the world. Small confusion leads people astray; great confusion changes their nature. Why do I say this? Ever since Shun of Yu, a legendary ancient ruler, promoted benevolence and righteousness and threw the world into disorder, everyone has been rushing about in pursuit of them. Is this not using benevolence and righteousness to change human nature?

Consider this: since the Three Dynasties of Xia, Shang, and Zhou, everyone in the world has traded their nature for something external. Common people sacrifice themselves for profit; scholars sacrifice themselves for fame; high officials sacrifice themselves for their families; and sages sacrifice themselves for the world. Their undertakings differ, as do their reputations and titles, but they are alike in damaging their nature and paying for it with their own lives.

臧与谷,二人相与牧羊而俱亡其羊。问臧奚事,则挟荚读书;问谷奚事,则博塞以游。二人者,事业不同,其於亡羊均也。伯夷死名於首阳之下,盗蹶死利於束陵之上。二人者,所死不同,其於残生伤性均也,奚必伯夷之是而盗蹶之非乎,天夷死名於首阳之下,盗蹶死利於束陵之上。二人者,所死不同,其於残生伤性均也,奚必伯夷之是而盗蹶之非乎,天下尽殉也:彼其所殉仁义也,则俗谓之君子;其所殉货财也,则俗谓之小人。其殉一也,则有君子焉,有小人焉;若其残生损性,则盗蹶亦伯夷已,又恶取君子小人於其问哉。且夫属其性乎仁义者,虽通如曾史,非吾所谓臧也;属其性於五味,虽通如俞儿,非吾所谓臧也;属其性乎五声,虽通如师旷,非吾所谓聪也;属其性乎五色,虽通如离朱,非吾所谓明也。吾所谓臧者,非仁义之谓也,臧於其德而已矣;吾所谓臧,虽通如师旷,非吾所谓聪也;属其性乎五色,虽通如离朱,非吾所谓明也。吾所谓臧者,非仁义之谓也,臧於其德而已矣;吾所谓臧者,非所谓仁义之谓也,臧於其德而已矣,吾所谓臧者,非所谓仁义之谓也,任其性命之情而已矣;吾所谓聪者,非谓其闻彼也,自闻而己矣;吾所谓明者,非谓其见彼也,自见而已矣。
Interpretation

Zang and Gu were herding sheep together, but both lost theirs. When asked what Zang had been doing, he said he had been holding a book and reading. When asked what Gu had been doing, he said he had been playing bosai, an ancient game. The two had been doing different things, but in both cases the sheep were lost.

Boyi died beneath Mount Shouyang for the sake of reputation; Robber Zhi died atop Mount Shuling for the sake of profit. The reasons they faced death were different, but both harmed their lives and injured their nature. Why must we say that Boyi was right and Robber Zhi wrong?

Everyone in the world gives themselves up for something. Those who sacrifice themselves for benevolence and righteousness are called gentlemen by convention; those who sacrifice themselves for wealth and possessions are called petty people. Their acts of giving up their lives are the same, yet convention calls one a gentleman and the other a petty person. If we judge by the harm done to life and the injury done to nature, Robber Zhi and Boyi are no different. How, then, can this be grounds for distinguishing gentlemen from petty people?

To confine one’s nature to benevolence and righteousness—even with the understanding of Zeng Shen and Shi Qiu—is not what I call goodness. To confine one’s nature to flavors—even with Yu’er’s refined sense of taste—is not what I call goodness. To confine one’s nature to the five tones—even with Shi Kuang’s keen hearing—is not what I call sharp hearing. To confine one’s nature to the five colors—even with Li Zhu’s keen sight—is not what I call clear perception.

The goodness I speak of does not mean following benevolence and righteousness; it means that De itself is fitting. The goodness I speak of means allowing one’s inborn nature and the true conditions of one’s life to unfold as they are. The sharp hearing I speak of does not mean hearing external things clearly, but being able to hear oneself. Clear perception does not mean seeing external things clearly, but being able to know oneself.

夫不自见而见彼,不自得而得彼者,是得人之得而不自得其得者也,适人之适而不自适其适者也。夫适人之适而不自适其适,虽盗蹶与伯夷,是同为淫僻也。余愧乎道德,是以上不敢为仁义之操,而下不敢为淫僻之行也。 南华真经卷之二外篇马蹄第九马,蹄可以践霜雪,毛可以御风寒,龄草饮水,翘足而陆,此马之真性也。虽有义台路寝,无所用之。及至伯乐,曰:我善治马。烧蹄第九马,蹄可以践霜雪,毛可以御风寒,龄草饮水,翘足而陆,此马之真性也。虽有义台路寝,无所用之。及至伯乐,曰:我善治马。烧之,剔之,刻之,维之,连之以羁毕,编之以早栈,马之死者十二三矣。饥之,渴之,驰之,骤之,整之,齐之,前有极饰之患,而后有鞭荚之威,而马之死者已过半矣。陶者曰:我善治坛,圆者中规,方者中矩。匠人曰:我善治木,曲者中钩,直者应绳。夫坛木之性,岂欲中规矩钩绳哉?然且世世称之日伯乐善治马,而陶匠善治坛木,此亦治天下者之过也。吾意善治天下者不然。彼民有常性,织而衣,耕而食,是谓同德;一而不党,命日天放世世称之日伯乐善治马,而陶匠善治坛木,此亦治天下者之过也。吾意善治天下者不然。彼民有常性,织而衣,耕而食,是谓同德;一而不党,命日天放,故至德之世,其行填填,其视颠颠。当是时也,山无蹊隧,泽无舟梁,万物群生,连属其乡,禽兽成群,草木遂长。是故禽兽可系羁而游,乌鹊之巢可攀援而阀。
Interpretation

People do not first understand themselves, yet go on to understand others; they do not first obtain what they themselves need, yet go on to obtain what others possess. They end up receiving only what others receive, without gaining what is truly their own. They follow the comforts of others without enjoying their own. To follow another’s comfort while neglecting one’s own is to stray from the right path, whether one is Zhi the Bandit or Bo Yi. I feel ashamed before the Dao and De, so I dare not promote the practice of benevolence and righteousness above, nor indulge in depraved conduct below.

The True Classic of the Southern Florescence, Scroll Two, Outer Chapters, “Horses’ Hooves,” Chapter Nine

A horse’s hooves can tread across frost and snow, and its coat can withstand wind and cold. It eats grass and drinks water, lifts its hooves and leaps about: this is the nature of a horse. As for lofty terraces and deep mansions, they are of no use to horses.

Then Bole appeared and said, “I am skilled at training horses.” He cauterized their hooves, trimmed their coats, carved and shaped them, then bound them with ropes, fitted them with bridles and reins, and kept them in pens. As a result, two or three out of every ten horses died. Next, he starved them and left them thirsty, drove them to run and trained them in formation, making them keep an orderly pace. They were troubled at the front by the ornaments and restraints, and threatened from behind by the whip. In the end, more than half the horses died.

The potter says, “I am skilled at making pottery: I make round things to fit a compass and square things to fit a carpenter’s square.” The carpenter says, “I am skilled at working wood: I shape curves to fit a hook gauge and straight lines to fit an inkline.” But surely clay and wood were not brought into being in order to conform to compasses, squares, hook gauges, and inklines. For generations, people have praised Bole for his skill at managing horses, and potters and carpenters for their skill at working clay and wood. This is precisely the error made by those who govern the world. I believe that a good ruler of the world should not act this way.

The people have their constant nature: they weave cloth and wear it, they farm and eat. This is called sharing the same true nature. People are simple and alike, and do not form factions for private gain. This state is called “Heavenly Freedom”—that is, letting things follow their natural course. In the age of perfect De, people moved with composure and looked upon the world with unclouded simplicity. In those days, there were no paths or tunnels in the mountains, and no boats or bridges across the waters. All things grew and flourished, joined together and connected; birds and beasts gathered in flocks, and plants and trees grew luxuriantly. People could therefore roam with livestock tethered to them, or climb up to the nests of magpies and crows.

夫至德之世,同与禽兽居,族与万物并,恶乎知君子小人哉,同乎无知,其德不离;同乎无欲,是谓素朴。素朴而民性得矣。及至圣人,整趸为仁,提歧为义,而天下始疑矣,澶漫为乐,摘僻为礼,而天下始分矣。故纯朴不残,孰为牺樽?白玉不毁,孰为珪璋?道德不废,安取仁义?性情不离,安用礼乐?、五色不乱,孰为文采?五声不乱,孰应六律?夫残朴以为器,工匠之罪也;毁仁义?性情不离,安用礼乐?、五色不乱,孰为文采?五声不乱,孰应六律?夫残朴以为器,工匠之罪也;毁道德以为仁义,圣人之过也。夫马,陆居财食草饮水,喜则交颈相靡,怒则分背相跟。马知已此矣。夫加之以衡扼,齐之以月题,而马知介倪、闽扼、惊曼、诡衔、窃辔。故马之知而能至盗者,伯乐之罪也。夫赫胥氏之时,民居不知所为,行不知所之,含哺而熙,鼓腹而游,民能已此矣。及至圣人.屈折礼乐以匡天下之形,县歧仁义以慰天下之心,而民乃始跟歧好知,争归於利,不可止也。此亦圣人之过也。
Interpretation

In the age when De was at its purest, people lived alongside animals and shared kinship with all things. How could anyone distinguish the noble from the base? Everyone lived in a state of undivided ignorance, and De had not scattered. No one had desires; this was called simplicity. When simplicity was preserved, the people’s nature could unfold of its own accord.

Later, the sages formulated benevolence and promoted righteousness, and only then did the world begin to grow confused. They elaborated music and subdivided ritual, and the world began to divide. If the original wholeness of the uncarved block had not been damaged, who would have made the sacrificial zun vessel? If white jade had not been cut and carved, who would have made the gui and zhang ritual jades? If De had not been discarded, why would anyone have needed to promote benevolence and righteousness? If human nature had not been scattered, why would ritual and music have been needed to regulate it? If the five colors had not been mixed together, who would have created elaborate decoration? If the five notes had not been mixed together, who would have needed to harmonize the six pitch standards?

Carving the wholeness of the uncarved block into implements is the craftsperson’s fault; destroying De in order to promote benevolence and righteousness is the sage’s fault.

Horses live on land, eating grass and drinking water. When pleased, they rub their necks together; when angry, they turn away from one another and kick. That is all the horse’s nature knows. Later, people fitted horses with crossbars and yokes and restrained them with moon-shaped forehead ornaments. The horses then learned to rear up and struggle, batter the yokes, and leap about in fright. They even learned to spit out their bits and slip their reins. The horses grew cunning and could even escape control. This was Bole’s fault—the fault of the man famed for judging horses.

In the age of the legendary ruler Hexu, people lived without knowing what they were doing, and traveled without knowing where they were going. They kept food in their mouths, played happily, patted their bellies, and wandered at ease. Life simply went no further than that. Later, the sages used ritual and music to correct people’s conduct throughout the world, and held benevolence and righteousness high to soothe their hearts. Only then did people begin to chase fame and profit, prize cleverness, and compete to seize gain without end. This, too, was the sages’ fault.

南华真经卷之二外篇朕筐第十将为肚筐、探囊、发匮之盗而为守备,则必摄‘缄滕、固府镭;此世俗之二外篇朕筐第十将为肚筐、探囊、发匮之盗而为守备,则必摄‘缄滕、固府镭;此世俗之所谓知也。然而巨盗至,则负匮、揭筐、担囊而趋;唯恐缄腾、肩镭之不固也。然则向之所谓知者,不乃为大盗积者也?故尝试论之,世俗之所谓知者,有不为大盗积者乎?所谓圣者,有不为大盗守者乎?何以知其然邪?昔者齐国,邻邑相望,鸡狗之音相闻,罔罟之所布,来耨之所刺,方三千余里。阖四境之内,所以立宗庙社稷,治邑屋州闻乡曲者,曷尝不法圣人哉?然而田成子一旦杀齐君而盗其国,所盗者岂独其国邪?并与其圣知之法而盗之,故母成子有乎盗法圣人哉?然而田成子一旦杀齐君而盗其国,所盗者岂独其国邪?并与其圣知之法而盗之,故母成子有乎盗贼之名,□而身处尧舜之安,小国不敢非,大国不敢诛,十二世有齐国。则是不乃窃齐国并与其圣知之法,以守其盗贼之身乎?尝试论之,世俗之所谓至知者,有不为大盗积者乎?所谓至圣者,有不为大盗守者乎?何以知其然邪?昔者龙逢斩,比干剖,苌弘驰,子胥靡。故四子之贤而身不免乎戮。故厂之徒问於蹶曰:盗亦有道乎?
Interpretation

To guard against thieves who steal chests, pick pockets, and pry open cabinets, you must bind the chests and cabinets tightly, lock them securely, and reinforce the storerooms. This is what worldly people call a clever solution. But when a great thief comes, he carries off the cabinets, hoists the chests onto his back, and slings the bags over his shoulder before running away, afraid only that the knots and locks might not be secure enough. In that case, wasn’t the so-called clever solution actually helping the great thief amass his wealth?

So let us consider this: among those whom the world calls clever, who is not helping great thieves amass their wealth? And among those called sages, who is not guarding that wealth for them? How do we know this is so? In the past, in the state of Qi, neighboring towns could see one another, and the crowing of roosters and barking of dogs could be heard across them. Fishing nets stretched everywhere, and farmers moved back and forth at their work; the territory extended for more than three thousand li in every direction. Within the state stood ancestral temples and altars to the soil and grain spirits, where ancestors and the gods of land and harvest were worshipped. The towns and villages were governed by institutions modeled on the sages’ systems. What among these was not so modeled?

Yet one day Tian Chengzi, a powerful minister of Qi during the Spring and Autumn period, killed the ruler of Qi and seized the state. Did he steal only the state? He also took for himself the laws and wisdom laid down by the sages. Although Tian Chengzi bore the name of a thief, in reality he enjoyed a position as secure as that of Yao and Shun. Small states did not dare criticize him, and great states did not dare attack him. Generation after generation, the Tian family held Qi. Is this not an example of stealing the state of Qi and then using the sages’ laws to protect his status as a thief?

Let us consider this again: among those whom the world calls the most brilliant, who is not helping great thieves amass their wealth? And among those called the most exalted sages, who is not guarding that wealth for them? How do we know this is so? Long Feng was beheaded, Bi Gan was disemboweled, Chang Hong was killed, and Wu Zixu, a minister of Wu during the Spring and Autumn period, was thrown into the river. In the end, none of these four worthy men escaped death.

So the followers of Robber Zhi asked him, “Is there a code of conduct even for thieves?”

.厂曰:何适而无有道邪?夫妄意室中之藏,圣也;入先,勇也;出后,义也;知可否,知也;分均,仁也。五者不备而能成大盗者,天下未之有也之藏,圣也;入先,勇也;出后,义也;知可否,知也;分均,仁也。五者不备而能成大盗者,天下未之有也。由是观之,善人不得圣人之道不立,厂不得圣人之道不行;天下之善人少,而不善人多,则圣人之利天下也少,而害天下也多。故曰:唇竭则齿寒,鲁酒薄而郡邓围,圣人生而大盗起。舍击圣人,纵舍盗贼,而天下始治矣。夫川竭而谷虚,丘夷而渊实。圣人已死,则大盗不起,天下平而无故矣。圣人不死,大盗不止。虽重圣人而洽天下,则是重利盗蹶也。为之斗斛以量之,则并与斗斛而窃之;为之权衡以称之,则并与权衡而窃之;为之符玺以信之,则并与符玺而窃之。为之斗斛以量之,则并与斗斛而窃之;为之权衡以称之,则并与权衡而窃之;为之符玺以信之,则并与符玺而窃之;为之仁义以娇之,则并与仁义而窃之。何以知其然邪?彼窃钩者诛,窃国者为诸侯,诸侯之门而仁义存焉。则是非窃仁义圣知邪?故逐於大盗、揭诸侯、窃仁义并斗斛权衡符玺之利者,虽有轩冕之赏弗能劝,斧铁之威弗能禁。此重利
Interpretation

Zhi, the legendary great thief, said, “Where could there be a place without the Dao? Guessing what is hidden inside a house is cleverness; entering first is courage; leaving last is loyalty; judging whether a deed can be done is wisdom; dividing the spoils fairly is benevolence and righteousness. Without these five virtues, no one could become a great thief. There has never been such a thing in all under heaven.

“From this we can see that good people cannot establish themselves without the way of the sages, and great thieves cannot succeed without it either. Good people are few, while those who are not good are many. So the sages bring little benefit to the world and cause much harm. It is said that when the lips are gone, the teeth grow cold; because Lu brewed its wine too weak, a distant state was besieged. When sages appear, great thieves rise along with them. Only when sages are cast aside and thieves left unchecked can the world begin to settle.

“When rivers dry up, streams and valleys run empty; when hills are leveled, deep ravines fill in. When the sages die, great thieves will no longer rise, and the world will be peaceful. If the sages do not die, great thieves will never cease. Even honoring the sages to govern the world only gives thieves greater opportunities for gain.

“People make measuring vessels to measure quantities, and thieves steal the vessels along with what they measure. They make scales and weights to weigh things, and thieves steal the scales and weights too. They make tallies and seals to verify authenticity, and thieves steal those as well. They promote benevolence and righteousness to correct the ways of the age, and thieves simply steal benevolence and righteousness too. How do we know this is so? Someone who steals a belt hook is put to death, while someone who seizes a state becomes a lord. And at the lords’ courts, benevolence and righteousness are celebrated. Is this not a case of stealing benevolence, righteousness, and the sages’ wisdom?

“Thus, those who follow great thieves, support lords, and steal along with them the benefits brought by benevolence and righteousness, measuring vessels, scales and weights, tallies and seals cannot be encouraged even by rewards of grand carriages and fine robes. Nor can they be stopped by the threat of axe and executioner’s blade. Such measures only bring them greater profits.”

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

Vol. 2 →