中文 · EN

《南华真经新传(王雱)》

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 1 volumes 3,512 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南华真经新传(王雱)》 (Taixuan 太玄部, 1 volume) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 9 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

Vol. 1

南华真经新传(王雱) > 经名:南华真经新传(王雱),收录于《中华道藏》四子真经。 经名:南华真经新传。北宋王雱(字元泽)撰,约出朴绍圣丙子年(1096)。二十卷。底本出处:《正统道藏》洞神部玉诀类。参校本:一、清《四库全书》本(简称四库本);二、清光绪二年浙江书局刻印本(简称浙江书局本);三、宋陈碧虚《庄子阙误》(简称阙误)。 南华真经新传卷之五 宋王元泽传 大宗师篇 夫德之充者,入於道。道者,天下莫不由之也。虽天地之至大,万物之至多,皆同归而一致矣。此庄子作大宗师之篇,而所以次之於德充符也。 知天之所为,知人之所为者,至矣。 天人皆出於道,而尽道者,能知天人之所为。夫天之所为者,无为也;人之所为者,有为也。无为则静,静天人皆出於道,而尽道者,能知天人之所为。夫天之所为者,无为也;人之所为者,有为也。无为则静,静则复命;有为则动,动则有义。能知义,命之极,则物之所宗师也。故曰至矣。 知天之所为者,天而生也;知人之所为者,以其知之所知以养其知之所不知,终其天年而不中道夭1者,是知之盛也。虽然,有患。
Interpretation

To understand how nature (the Heavenly Dao) operates, and also to understand human actions, is to have reached the highest realm.

Heaven and humanity both originate from the Dao (the Way). Those who can fully embody the Dao will understand how the Heavenly Dao and human affairs each operate. The functioning of the Heavenly Dao is Wuwei (non-action), that is, without deliberate contrivance; human functioning is youwei, that is, taking action. Wuwei brings stillness, and stillness allows a return to original nature; youwei leads to movement, and movement gives rise to principles of righteousness and reason. One who can comprehend the ultimate of these principles and of Heaven’s mandate can become the ancestral master upon whom all things rely and whom they take as their model. Thus it is said that such understanding has already reached the highest realm.

Those who understand how the Heavenly Dao operates are born in accordance with their heavenly nature; those who understand how human actions operate use what they already know in order to nourish what they do not yet know. To live out the full span of one’s Heaven-given life without dying prematurely along the way is the expression of wisdom at its zenith. Even so, worries and troubles will still remain.

夫知天人之所为者,以不知知之也,以不知知天,则达於无为之妙理而命之所以至也,以不知知人,则尽於有为之极致而物之所以最也。命之至,则其生自然,物之最,则与天为徒;然而人之所为务知而不上,则是任智而已。任智则知之过甚矣。故曰是知之盛也。夫任智而过知,则反伤生。故曰虽然有患。 夫知有所待而后当,其所待者持未定也。庸讵。故曰是知之盛也。夫任智而过知,则反伤生。故曰虽然有患。 夫知有所待而后当,其所待者持未定也。庸讵知吾所谓天之非人乎?所谓人之非天乎? 天者,一气之所凝,人亦一气之所聚。庄子达观而知天具一人,知人具一天,天人大同而无所分别矣。故曰庸讵知吾所谓天之非人乎?所谓人之非天乎? 且有真人而后有真知。何谓真人?古之真人,不逆寡,不雄成,不谟士。若然者,过而弗悔,当而不自得也。若然者,登高不栗,入水不濡,入火不热。是知之登假於道也若此。
Interpretation

One who truly understands what Heaven does and what the human does knows by means of "not-knowing." Knowing Heaven through not-knowing, such a person can penetrate the subtle principle of Wuwei (non-action, 无为) and reach the furthest limit that life can attain. Knowing the human through not-knowing, such a person can exhaust the highest realm of purposeful action and become the most outstanding among all things. When life reaches its limit, it follows its own nature; when one is most outstanding among all things, one becomes of the same kind as Heaven. Yet what people of the world do is seek knowledge ceaselessly without knowing when to stop, which amounts to nothing more than giving free rein to cleverness. Giving free rein to cleverness means knowing to excess, and so this is called "the height of knowing." To pursue knowledge excessively through cleverness only harms life, and so the text says, "Even so, there is still trouble."

Knowledge must rely on something to be fitting, yet the thing it relies on is itself uncertain. How do we know that what I call Heaven is not the human, and that what I call the human is not Heaven?

Heaven is formed by the condensation of a single Qi (vital energy, 气), and the human too is formed by the gathering of a single Qi. Zhuangzi saw through to this with full clarity: within Heaven there is a human, and within the human there is a Heaven. Heaven and the human are fundamentally one body, without division.

Moreover, there must first be a True Person (Zhenren, 真人, one who has cultivated the Dao to the highest realm) before there can be true knowledge. What is a True Person? The True Persons of old did not shun those who were few or weak, did not use success to make a show of strength, and did not scheme over affairs. Such people felt no regret when they missed an opportunity and felt no self-satisfaction when they got things right. Such people did not tremble when climbing to great heights, were not soaked when entering water, and did not feel the heat when entering fire. This is what it looks like when wisdom ascends to union with the Dao (the Way, 道).

与化为一,直内而不假於物者,真人也。真者,言乎其性也,以其性之如是,其所知则非出於人为之伪矣。故曰且有真人而后有真知。真知者,不知也。然而真人之所以为真人者,持知则非出於人为之伪矣。故曰且有真人而后有真知。真知者,不知也。然而真人之所以为真人者,持其顺以待少,守其雌而若缺,不谋不致而士自来合。故曰不逆寡,不雄成,不谟士,真人如此而安有於过欤?且或有过,则不以得失介于心。不介于心,则无心於物也。无心於物则与物不迕,而物亦莫能伤之矣。故曰若然者,过而弗悔,当而不自得也。若然者,登高不栗,入水不濡,入火不热。夫如是,非真人有异於人,尽以真知而入道矣。故曰是知之能登假於道也若此。 古之真人,其寝不梦,其觉无忧,其食不甘,其息深深。 真人绝累而忘情,其寝所以不梦也;道矣。故曰是知之能登假於道也若此。 古之真人,其寝不梦,其觉无忧,其食不甘,其息深深。 真人绝累而忘情,其寝所以不梦也;乐天而知命,其觉所以不忧也,味其无味,其食所以不甘也;静复於静,其息所以深深也。 真人之息以踵,众人之息以喉;屈服者,其嗌言若哇,其嗜欲深者,其天机浅。
Interpretation

To merge into one with the transformations of the myriad things, remaining inwardly upright and not relying on external objects to establish oneself—such a person is the True Person (zhenren). Here “true” refers to a person’s original nature. Because their nature is like this, their knowing does not arise from human artifice; thus it is said that first there is the True Person and only afterward is there true knowledge. What is called true knowledge is simply not deliberately seeking to know.

What makes the True Person a True Person is according with things and awaiting the proper moment, abiding in softness and weakness without seeking to display oneself; not deliberately scheming, not forcing outcomes, so that those of like mind who share the same Dao naturally come to join them. Therefore it is said that the True Person does not reject the few, does not claim credit for achievements, and does not deliberately recruit talent. How could such a person insistently dwell on faults? Even if there is some fault, they do not let gain and loss lodge in the heart. When the heart does not cling to gain and loss, it is not stirred by external things; not being stirred by external things, one remains at peace with things without opposition and is not harmed by them. Thus it is said that such a person has faults yet feels no regret, and does what is right yet does not regard it as a personal accomplishment.

Such a person does not tremble when climbing high places, is not soaked when entering water, and does not feel the heat when walking into fire. This does not mean the True Person possesses extraordinary powers unlike ordinary people; rather, by means of true knowledge they have entered deeply into the Great Dao and attained this state.

The True Persons of antiquity did not dream when they slept, felt no sorrow when they awoke, did not crave flavors when they ate, and their breathing was deep and prolonged.

The True Person severs entanglements and forgets emotional attachments, and therefore has no chaotic dreams in sleep; they accord with nature and know their allotted fate, and therefore have no worries upon waking; they experience the bland and flavorless, and therefore do not pursue tastes in food; the inner mind returns from stillness to still deeper stillness, and therefore the breathing is deep and prolonged.

When the True Person breathes, the breath seems to issue from the heels; ordinary people breathe as if it reaches only the throat. Those who are repressed and yielding speak as if something is stuck in the throat; the deeper a person’s cravings and desires, the shallower their innate spiritual clarity and faculty.

踵者,身之根也;喉者,导於气也;根不可以卒动,气不可以久窒。真人之息以踵者,盖能归根而静也;众人之息以喉者,由其窒气之出也。归根而静,其息愈久;窒气之出,其息不久。愈久者,由其忘於嗜欲也,不能久者,由其深於嗜欲也。 古之真人,不知说生,不知恶死;其出不欣,其入不距;翛然而往,翛然而来而已矣。不忘其所始,不求其所终;受而喜之,忘而复之,是之谓不以心捐道,不以人助天。是之谓真人。若然者,其心志;其容寂,其;受而喜之,忘而复之,是之谓不以心捐道,不以人助天。是之谓真人。若然者,其心志;其容寂,其颡頯;凄然似秋,暖然似春,喜怒通四时,与物有宜莫知其极。
Interpretation

The heels are the root of the body, and the throat is the passageway through which the breath of Qi (vital energy) enters and exits. The root cannot be violently shaken all at once, nor can the breath be obstructed for long. The Zhenren (True Person), one who has realized the Great Dao (the Way), breathes deeply, as if the breath reaches the heels, because they are able to return body and mind to the root and remain still. Ordinary people’s breathing stays near the throat, as if the breath were blocked. Returning to the root and remaining still allows the breath to become long and continuous; when the breath is obstructed, breathing cannot last. Long, continuous breathing comes from no longer being immersed in preferences and desires; the inability to last comes from being deeply trapped in preferences and desires.

The Zhenren of ancient times neither clung especially to life nor disliked death. When life arrived they did not rejoice on that account; when death came they did not resist it. They departed of themselves and arrived of themselves. They did not deliberately recall the beginning of life, nor did they seek after its end. In receiving life they accepted it gladly; in forgetting life they followed what was natural. This is called not harming the Dao with the human mind and not using human artifice to interfere with nature. Such a person is called a Zhenren.

Such a person has a mind that is unified and concentrated, a demeanor that is still and quiet, and a broad forehead. At times they reveal an autumnal coolness and clarity; at times they display a spring-like warmth. Their joy and anger follow the transformations of the four seasons, and they accord perfectly with the myriad things; no one can fathom the utmost limits of their changes.

In the original text there is a lacuna or textual corruption at the phrase “其心志;其容寂,其,” and therefore the interpretation here follows only the identifiable wording of “a unified and concentrated mind, a still and quiet demeanor, and a broad forehead.”

真人寓六骸,象耳目,安时处顺而哀乐不能入。故曰不知悦生,不知恶死。所往无不应,无入不自得。故曰其出不欣,其入不距。翛然而往者,游於形器之外也;翛然而来者,不在形器之内也。入道之妙而不忘其始,与化冥合而不求其终。故曰不忘其始。如不求其所终,自得而无愠。故曰受而喜之。忘己而复命,故曰忘而复之。如此,则纵心之所得而不离道,仕物之自然而不过益其真,所以真真也。故曰是之谓不以心捐道,不以人助天,是之谓真人。夫真人之所以如此者,其真君安然道,仕物之自然而不过益其真,所以真真也。故曰是之谓不以心捐道,不以人助天,是之谓真人。夫真人之所以如此者,其真君安然而无虑也,其状貌咒然而无动也,其颡頯朴然而无饰也。不怒而威,不仁而爱,与四时所以合;其序处万物,无有其不当,孰能测其终极乎?故曰若然者,其心志,其容寂,其颡頯,然凄然似秋,暖然似春。喜怒通四时,与物有宜而莫知其极。
Interpretation

The True Person regards the six parts of the body—the head, the torso, and the four limbs—as a place of temporary lodging, and the ears and eyes as tools for knowing external things. He is content with the times and follows along with change, so that sorrow and joy cannot disturb his inner heart. Therefore it is said that he neither particularly clings to life nor detests death; wherever he goes he can accord with things, and in any situation he enters he remains peacefully at ease. Thus it is said that when he leaves he does not rejoice, and when he returns he does not resist.

He departs freely because his Shen (spirit) wanders beyond physical form and material objects; he returns freely because his original nature is not confined within physical form and material objects. He has comprehended the mystery of the Dao (the Way), yet does not forget the original beginning of life; he unites with the transformations of the myriad things, yet does not seek to foresee the end of those transformations. Even without inquiring into the ultimate destination, he can still be self-content without resentment, so it is said that he accepts change and gladly faces it. He forgets his private self and returns to authenticity, so it is said that he forgets the self and restores original nature.

Such a person acts with a free mind, yet what he obtains never departs from the Dao; he follows the natural transformations of the myriad things without deliberately adding to or diminishing original nature—this is called preserving authentic nature. Therefore the so-called True Person is one who does not harm the Dao through subjective intention, nor interfere with nature through human artifice.

The reason the True Person can be like this is that the inner “True Lord” (referring to the authentic spirit that governs body and mind) is peacefully without concern. His expression is still and unmoved by external things; his forehead is broad and unadorned, without artifice. He shows no angry countenance yet naturally possesses dignity; he does not deliberately practice benevolence yet naturally cares for the myriad things, and thus accords with the movement of the four seasons. In arranging and treating the myriad things there is nothing inappropriate—who then can know the ultimate extent of his transformations?

Therefore it is said that such a person’s will is calm, his demeanor still, his forehead broad; at times as austere as autumn, at times as warm as spring. His joy and anger follow the changes of the four seasons, corresponding to the myriad things in just the right measure, yet no one can clearly see the ultimate of his transformations.

故圣人之用兵也,亡国而不失人心;利泽施乎万世,不为爱人。故乐通物,非圣人也;有亲,非仁也;天时,非贤也;利害不通,非君子也;行名失己,非士也;亡身不真,非役人也。若狐不偕、务光、伯夷、叔齐、箕子、胥余、纪他、申君子也;行名失己,非士也;亡身不真,非役人也。若狐不偕、务光、伯夷、叔齐、箕子、胥余、纪他、申徒狄,是役人之役,适人之适,而不自适其适者也。 夫真人者,以吾丧我,以道从身;不易内,不徇外;役物而不役於物,适性而不适於性也。若狐偕申徒狄之数子者,不能丧我而又丧其真,不能徇道而又徇於时,故役於物而不役於物,适於性而不适性,此所以不能立命也。故曰是役人之役,适人之道2而不自适其适也。 古之真人,其状义而不朋,若不足而不承,与乎其肌而不坚也,张乎其虚而不华也;邴邴乎其似喜乎3,崔乎其不得已乎4。痛乎进我也。
Interpretation

Thus, when the sage employs military force, even if it causes a state to perish, he does not thereby lose the hearts of the people; his grace and benefits extend through ten thousand generations, yet he does not act in order to deliberately confer kindness upon others.

Simply going along with and catering to the myriad things does not make one a sage; showing partial affection and closeness to certain people does not constitute humaneness; acting solely according to heavenly timing does not make one worthy; failing to discern clearly the relations of benefit and harm does not make one a gentleman; pursuing reputation and thereby losing oneself does not make one a scholar; harming one's own person while violating original authenticity cannot be said to amount to directing others without being directed by them. Figures such as Hu Buxie, Wu Guang, Bo Yi, Shu Qi, Ji Zi, Xu Yu, Ji Ta, and Shentu Di all performed tasks for others and accommodated others' wishes, yet they did not follow their own innate nature or settle their own hearts and minds.

The so-called True Man is one who can achieve “losing the self” (setting aside the obstinate ego), allowing his own person to follow the Dao (the Way); he does not alter his inner nature, nor does he blindly follow the external world; he is able to make use of external things without being dominated by them, and he accords with his heavenly nature without being bound by it. People such as Hu Buxie and Shentu Di could not set aside the self and instead harmed their original authenticity; they could not follow the Dao but instead chased after the trends of the times. Consequently they were dominated by external things and could not truly employ them; they acted in accordance with their heavenly nature yet did not truly settle that nature, and thus could not find peace for themselves or establish their lives. This is what is meant by doing things for others and catering to others' wishes without according with one's own nature.

The manner of the ancient True Man was solemn without forming factions; he seemed to have some deficiency yet did not rely on external things to make it good; he associated harmoniously with others, yet his body was neither stiff nor constrained; his inner being was open, empty, and quiet, yet not ostentatious. His expression was bright, as though carrying a hint of joy; he also appeared still, as if everything were done only because it could not be otherwise. He advanced cautiously and with keen intensity.

古之真人,其状义而不朋,若不足而不承,与乎其肌而不坚也,张乎其虚而不华也;邴邴乎其似喜乎3,崔乎其不得已乎4。痛乎进我色也,与乎止我德也;厉乎其似世乎。警乎其未可制也;连乎其似好闭也,悗乎忘其言也。以刑为体,以礼为翼,以知为时,以德为循。以刑为体者,绰乎其杀也;以礼为翼者,所以行於世也;以知为时者,不得已於事也;以德为循者,言其与有足者至於丘也;而人真以为勤行者也。 刑者,天刑也。天刑者,天之命也。万物皆有命,而备於我,所谓以刑为体也。礼者,履也,履得其道,则不行,天刑也。天刑者,天之命也。万物皆有命,而备於我,所谓以刑为体也。礼者,履也,履得其道,则不行而至,所谓以礼为翼也。知者,知也,知不凝滞,则与世推移,所谓以知为时也。德者,以自得於内,则日可见其所安行,所谓以德为循也。夫物我之死,暂往也,吾何系吝於其间?故曰以刑为体者,绰乎其杀也。道无终极而我履而不息,故曰以礼为翼者,所以行於世也。与世推移而非有心於事,故曰以知为时者,不得已於事也。自得而安行虽有足者,亦何行而升上,故曰以德为循者,言其与有足者至於丘也。此四者,真人非有意於行,而人寔谓之力行也。故曰真人以为勤行者也。
Interpretation

The ancient Zhenren (True Person) handled affairs impartially yet formed no cliques for private gain; they appeared deficient yet attached themselves to no one. Their body and mind were yielding and pliant, showing no rigidity; their inner chest was empty and still, without ostentation or display. Their expression was bright, as if joyful; yet they also seemed quiet, as if many things were done only out of necessity. Their look was deep, as if carrying a sense of pain; they dealt with the world mildly, able to rest content in their own De (Virtue/Power). They appeared solemn, as if in accord with the mundane world; yet they remained alert and self-possessed, as if unswayed by external things. They seemed coherent and unhurried, as if unwilling to speak much; at times even silent, as though they had forgotten what they themselves had said.

The Zhenren took “punishment” as the foundation for establishing themselves, “ritual” as the aid for action, “knowledge” to accord with the times, and De as the criterion for conduct. Here “punishment” refers to heavenly punishment, that is, the Mandate of Heaven; taking the Mandate of Heaven as their foundation, the Zhenren could therefore be composed and lenient toward life, death, executions, and killings. Taking “ritual” as aid means that ritual is like a person’s treading, enabling one to walk in the world. Taking “knowledge” to accord with the times means not clinging to any fixed view, shifting with worldly circumstances when affairs arise, acting only as compelled by the situation. Taking De as the criterion means that, having attained something within, one can peacefully follow it day after day; it is as natural as a person with feet walking to a hill. Others, however, would regard this manner of acting as deliberate, diligent cultivation.

What is called “punishment” is heavenly punishment; heavenly punishment is the Mandate of Heaven. The myriad things each have their own destiny, and the principles of destiny are all complete within me; this is “taking punishment as the body.” What is called “ritual” is treading; treading in accord with the Dao (the Way) allows one to proceed with the current and arrive naturally; this is “taking ritual as wings.” What is called “knowledge” is clear perception; perceiving clearly without stagnation, one can change with the trends of the world; this is “taking knowledge as according with the time.” What is called De is inner self-attainment; from this one can perceive the criterion one follows in acting peacefully; this is “taking De as that which is followed.”

The births and deaths of the myriad things and of myself are merely temporary comings and goings; why should I be attached or stingy on their account? Therefore those who take heavenly punishment as the foundation for establishing themselves can be composed and lenient in the face of life, death, executions, and killings. The Dao has no terminus; I tread on without cease, and so it is said that ritual is like wings that let one travel through the world. Following the changes of worldly circumstances yet not intentionally clinging to any particular thing, thus taking knowledge to respond to the time means acting only because the situation compels it. With inner self-attainment one acts in peace; even when, like a person with feet, one reaches a hill, one does not feel it as a deliberate rush. Therefore taking De as the criterion means that the Zhenren, like a person with feet, naturally arrives at the hill. The Zhenren carries out these four things not as intentional, bitter self-cultivation, yet others regard it as diligent exertion.

故其好之也一,其弗好之也一。其一也一,其不一也一。其一与天为徒,其不一与人为徒。 真人无心其好恶,所以一也。真人抱一一不一,所以同也。无心而一,则任自然。故其一与天为徒,其不一与人为徒。 真人无心其好恶,所以一也。真人抱一一不一,所以同也。无心而一,则任自然。故曰与天为徒也。抱一而同,则或使然,故曰与人为徒也。 天与人不相胜也,是之谓真人。死生,命也,其有夜旦之常,天也。人之有所不得与,皆物之情也。彼特以天为父,而身犹爱之,而况其卓乎。人特以有君为愈乎己,而身犹死之,而况其真乎。泉涸,鱼相与处於陆,相呴以湿,相濡以沫,不如相忘於江湖。与其誉尧而非桀也,不如两忘而化其道。 毁誉者,世情之变。圣人虽为之应,而心完无有。若夫遗世情,而特以兼忘为是者,此庄子之所非,而世之愚儒反以非庄子也。 夫大块载我以形,劳我以生,佚我以老,息我以心完无有。若夫遗世情,而特以兼忘为是者,此庄子之所非,而世之愚儒反以非庄子也。 夫大块载我以形,劳我以生,佚我以老,息我以死。故善5吾生者,乃所以善吾死也。 真人无佚老息死,此特为载形劳生言耳。
Interpretation

Therefore, whether the True Person (Zhenren) likes a thing or dislikes it, the state of mind remains the same; whether regarding a thing as the same or regarding it as different, the state of mind is likewise the same. When the True Person affirms the aspect in which the ten thousand things are identical, they accord with the heavenly Dao (the Way); when they acknowledge that the ten thousand things have differences, they follow the ordinary circumstances of the human world.

The True Person has no preconceived opinions and does not cling to likes and dislikes, and thus is able to equalize the ten thousand things. They hold fast to the root while also accommodating differences, and so can communicate with all things. To equalize the ten thousand things without a deliberate mind is to follow along with nature, and thus it is said they are “companions of Heaven”; to hold fast to the root yet still communicate with all things, as if governed by external things, is why it is said they are “companions of humanity.”

The Dao of Heaven and human affairs do not prevail over one another; such a person is called a True Person. Life and death are arrangements of fate, like the alternation of day and night—they are the constant pattern of nature. There are things in which people cannot take part and cannot change; these are simply the inherent conditions of things. People regard Heaven as a father and still cherish their own bodies; how much more, then, that Dao which stands uniquely independent and transcends the ten thousand things? People consider a ruler to surpass themselves and are still willing to sacrifice themselves for the ruler; how much more, then, the genuine Dao?

When the spring dries up and the fish are stranded on land, they moisten one another with their breath and wet one another with saliva; yet rather than caring for one another in this way, it would be better to forget one another and live freely in the rivers and lakes. Rather than praising Yao and condemning Jie, it would be better to forget both praise and condemnation and live in accordance with the transformations of the great Dao.

Praise and blame are changes in worldly human sentiment. Although the sage responds to them, the inner mind remains complete and self-sufficient, unaffected. As for discarding worldly emotions and taking “forgetting everything” alone as the correct way—this is precisely what Zhuangzi opposed; yet the ignorant Confucians of the world criticize Zhuangzi on this very basis.

The great earth bears our physical form, makes us toil for our living, grants us ease in old age, and finally lets us rest in death. Therefore, to treat one’s own life well is also to treat one’s own death well.

The True Person does not regard old age as ease or death as rest; here, old age and death are spoken of only in the sense that the physical form is borne and life involves toil.

南华真经新传卷之五竟 1四库本、浙江书局本『天』均作『夭』,故改。 2四库本『道』为『适』。 3《阙误》引文成张本『喜乎』作『喜也』。 4又引文成张本『已乎』作『已也』,并据四库本、浙江书局本『已』上有『得』字,故补。 5『善』』。 3《阙误》引文成张本『喜乎』作『喜也』。 4又引文成张本『已乎』作『已也』,并据四库本、浙江书局本『已』上有『得』字,故补。 5『善』,原脱,据郭庆藩本
Interpretation

Volume Five of the New Commentary on the Nanhua Zhenjing (Nanhua Zhenjing Xinzhuan) ends here. The Siku edition and the Zhejiang Book Company edition read “夭,” so the text has been emended accordingly. The Siku edition has “适.” In the Wencheng Zhang edition cited in the Quewu, “喜乎” appears as “喜也.” In the same Wencheng Zhang edition, “已乎” is given as “已也”; moreover, the Siku and Zhejiang Book Company editions place the character “得” before “已,” which has therefore been supplied. The original text omitted the character “善,” which has been restored on the basis of Guo Qingfan’s edition.

补。

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback