中文 · EN

《养生辨疑诀》

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taiqing 太清部 1 volumes 1,724 characters

About this page. The original text of 《养生辨疑诀》 (Taiqing 太清部, 1 volume) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 3 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

Vol. 1

养生辨疑诀 > 经名:养生辨疑诀,收录于《中华道藏》太清摄养经。 栖真子施肩吾述 一气无方,与时消息,万物生死,共气盛衰。处自然之问,而皆不知所以然而然。其所禀习,在覆载之下。有形者先1知其本,知其本则求2无不通;修道先须正其源,正其源则流无不应。若弃其本而外求,背其源以邪究,虽猎尽百家,学穷诸子,徒广虚论功条,其摄养之效3,得者观之,实为自误4耳! 今历观世问,好道之流,不可胜数。虽知恬淡以自守,全不知恬淡之中有妙用矣;虽知虚摄养之效3,得者观之,实为自误4耳! 今历观世问,好道之流,不可胜数。虽知恬淡以自守,全不知恬淡之中有妙用矣;虽知虚无以为理,全不知虚无之中而无不为矣。若不知虚无恬淡妙用之理,徒委志於寂默之间,妄作於形神之外,是谓无益之用,非摄生之鸿渐也。
Interpretation

Qi (vital energy) exists as one unified substance without fixed form, waxing and waning according to the seasons. The birth and death of all things likewise change with the flourishing and decline of qi. Human beings dwell in the midst of nature yet often fail to understand why this is so. People receive qi between heaven and earth and thereby grow. All things that possess form should first recognize their own root; once the root is understood, one can thoroughly grasp the various principles. Cultivating the Dao (the Way) should likewise begin by setting the source aright. When the source is correct, subsequent transformations will naturally correspond. If one discards the root and seeks outwardly, turning away from the true source and entering a deviant path, even searching through the doctrines of the hundred schools and reading all the works of the various thinkers merely expands empty discourse in vain. Those who understand the way of nourishing life, upon seeing this, will know that it is truly self-deception.

Nowadays those in the world who love the arts of the Dao are too numerous to count. Although they know they should guard themselves with tranquility and simplicity (quietude with few desires and a settled mind), they have no understanding at all that within this tranquility and simplicity there is itself a subtle and marvelous function. Although they know that emptiness and non-being constitute the fundamental principle, they do not understand that within emptiness and non-being there is nothing that cannot be accomplished. If one does not comprehend the marvelous function of emptiness, non-being, and tranquility, but merely places the mind’s resolve in silent Wuwei (non-action) or acts arbitrarily, thereby departing from the harmony of physical form and Shen (spirit), this practice brings no benefit and is not the correct path for nurturing life and gradually cultivating the Dao.

且神由形住,形以神留,神苟外迁,形亦难保。抑又服饵草木金石,以固其形,而不知草木金石之性,不究四时逆顺之宜,久而服之,反伤和气。远不出中年之内,疾害俱生。使夫轻薄之流,皆谓系风捕影,不可得矣。翻以学者为不肖,以木金石之性,不究四时逆顺之宜,久而服之,反伤和气。远不出中年之内,疾害俱生。使夫轻薄之流,皆谓系风捕影,不可得矣。翻以学者为不肖,以真隐为诡道,不亦伤哉!惑5人尝以此事而讥余,曰:吾闻学道,可致长生。吾自童年至於暮齿,见学道之人已千数矣。服气绝粒者,驱役考召者,清静无欲者,修仙炼行者,如斯之流,未有不闻其死者也。身殁幽壤之下,徒以尸解为名。推此而论之,至皿得者犹灵骨耳,非可学而得之。余闻斯论,不觉心愍6于内,神恍7于外。沉昤之问,乃太息而应之曰:观子向来所说,实亦鄙之甚矣!迷之尤矣!今世人学人问8之事,犹有成与不成,又昆妙本玄深,昏昏默默,胡可造次而得之?且大道无亲,感之即应,苟云尤矣!今世人学人问8之事,犹有成与不成,又昆妙本玄深,昏昏默默,胡可造次而得之?且大道无亲,感之即应,苟云灵骨,无乃疏乎!然夫服气绝粒者,且道家之所尚,人苟得之,皆有不食之功,身轻之效9,便自言肠胃无滓,立致云霓,形体获轻,坐希鸾鹤。采饵者,复以毛女为凭;呼吸者,又引灵龟作证。曾不知真气暗灭10,胎精内枯,犹执滞理於松筠,守迷端於翰墨,良可嗟矣!宁不11怪乎?至於驱役考召之流,至皿是道中之法事。研讨至精,穷其真诰,诚为身外之虚名,妄作人问之孟浪12。在己无征於延益,於人有验於斡攘。乱构休祥,徒陈祸福。如斯之辈,并匪保生之道也。或以清静无为,深诰,诚为身外之虚名,妄作人问之孟浪12。在己无征於延益,於人有验於斡攘。乱构休祥,徒陈祸福。如斯之辈,并匪保生之道也。或以清静无为,深居绝俗,形同槁木,志类死灰,不知天地动用之心,不察阴阳运行之理。如此则虽游恍惚,其恍惚而无涯;纵合育冥,其官冥而莫测。翻使希夷之外,神用罔然;虚白之中,玄关失守。言议之际,中有高真。喟然而叹曰:守一非一,履真非真。此亦近为门阶之由,殊未窥其室中之用矣。大凡保气栖神,不可以湛然而得之,亦不可以元13然而守之。且神无方而气常运,形至静而用无穷。是知保气者,其要在乎运;栖神者,其秘在乎用。吾尝闻之於师曰:体虚而运,形至静而用无穷。是知保气者,其要在乎运;栖神者,其秘在乎用。吾尝闻之於师曰:体虚而气周,形静而神会。此盖为出世之玄机,无名之大用矣。
Interpretation

The Shen (spirit) relies on the physical form to dwell in peace, and the physical form is likewise sustained by the Shen. Once the Shen departs from the body, the form can no longer be preserved. Some people ingest medicines made from plants, herbs, metals, and minerals, hoping thereby to nourish the body, yet they neither understand the nature of these medicines nor examine whether the methods of taking them accord with the climatic changes of the four seasons. Taken over a long period, such medicines instead damage the harmonious Qi (vital energy) of the body; often before middle age, illnesses appear one after another. Superficial people then claim that cultivating the Dao (the Way) is like chasing the wind or grasping at shadows, utterly impossible to achieve. They regard those who study the Dao as incompetent and dismiss the true path of hidden cultivation as heretical and deviant. Is this not deeply regrettable?

Someone once ridiculed me on this account, saying: “I have heard that studying the Dao can lead to longevity. From childhood to old age, I have seen thousands upon thousands of people studying the Dao: those who ingest Qi and abstain from grains (using breath regulation in place of food and cutting off the five cereals), Daoists who command ghosts and spirits and summon the deities (invoking spirits in Daoist Zhaijiao purification rituals), those who live in quietude free of desire, and those who cultivate immortality and refine their conduct. Of all such people, I have never heard of one who did not die. After death they are buried in the earth, yet they merely boast under the name of ‘corpse liberation’ (the legend that cultivators abandon the physical body to ascend as immortals). From this it appears that even if they achieve something, they leave behind only miraculous remains, which cannot be obtained through study.”

Upon hearing these words, I could not help but feel pity, and my expression grew dazed. After pondering for a moment, I sighed and replied: “The words you have just spoken are extremely shallow and gravely mistaken. In all worldly affairs there is still a distinction between success and failure; how much more so with the Great Dao, which is subtle, profound, mysterious, and difficult to fathom—how could it be attained in haste? The Great Dao shows no favoritism; it responds wherever there is resonance. To claim that the fruits of cultivating the Dao are merely miraculous remains is far too superficial.

“Ingesting Qi and abstaining from grains is a method of cultivation esteemed by Daoists. If someone truly accomplishes it, there may be the effect of not taking food or drink and of a light, vigorous body. Yet they then claim that their intestines and stomach are free of filth, that they will soon fly up into the clouds, their bodies growing light, sitting and waiting for phoenixes and cranes to come welcome them. Those who gather herbs and take elixirs cite Mao Nü (the legendary immortal who attained longevity by ingesting medicines) as proof; those who practice exhaling and inhaling cite the numinous tortoise as evidence. They fail to understand that true Qi may be depleted without their noticing, and embryonic Jing (essence) may wither from within. Clinging to surface principles is like merely holding to the image of pine and bamboo; being bound by the letter of books is truly lamentable. Is this not strange?

“As for commanding ghosts and spirits and summoning deities, these are indeed ritual practices within Daoism. If one can study them carefully and probe deeply into the relevant scriptures, one may perhaps develop some expertise, but to treat them as empty fame outside oneself and to apply them recklessly is utterly absurd. Having no evidence of extending one’s own years or nourishing life, they nevertheless claim to others that they can avert disasters and dispel misfortunes; they fabricate auspicious omens and speak emptily of fortune and calamity. None of these are methods for preserving life.

“There are also those who take quietude and Wuwei (non-action) to mean dwelling in seclusion, cutting off worldly affairs, making the body like withered wood and the mind like dead ashes. They do not understand the vital movement of Heaven and Earth, nor observe the laws of Yin-Yang circulation. Thus even when they speak of boundless, indistinct realms, it is mere empty talk; even when they claim to accord with the deep and mysterious Dao, they still cannot fathom its true meaning. In the end they are at a loss beyond the realm of Xi Yi (the soundless and formless state of the Dao), and lose the mysterious pass (the crucial gateway of cultivation) within Xu Bai (the clear and luminous state of mind).

“When speaking of these matters, a certain High Perfected One (a realized immortal) sighed and said: ‘Guarding the One may not truly be guarding the One; practicing the true Dao may not be genuine cultivation. Such methods of practice are at most the steps for entering the gate; one has not yet glimpsed the wondrous functioning within the chamber of the Dao.’

“In sum, to nourish the breath and settle the original Shen cannot rely solely on constant stillness, nor on vacant holding. The Shen has no fixed location, yet the breath always circulates; though the body is still, its functioning is inexhaustible. Therefore the key to nourishing the breath lies in circulation, and the secret of settling the original Shen lies in its application. I once heard my teacher say: ‘When body and mind are made empty and still, Qi can circulate throughout; when the form is quiet, Shen can gather.’ This is the mysterious key that transcends the mundane, and also the vast functioning of the nameless Great Dao.”

养生辨疑诀竟 1先:此下《云笈七签》有『须』字。 2求:《云笈七签》作『未』。 3徒广虚论功条,其摄养之效:《云笈七签》作『徒广虚论之功,终无摄养之效』。.4误:《云笈七签》作『悟』。 5惑:咋云笈七签》作『或』。 6愍:此下《云笈七签》有『然』字。 7恍:此下《云笈七签》有『惚』字。 8人问:《云笈七签》作『凡问』。 9皆有不食之功,身轻之效:《云笈七签》。 6愍:此下《云笈七签》有『然』字。 7恍:此下《云笈七签》有『惚』字。 8人问:《云笈七签》作『凡问』。 9皆有不食之功,身轻之效:《云笈七签》作『皆有不食轻举之效』。 10减:《云望七签》作『减』。 11不:原作『所』,据《云笈七签》改。 12妄作人问之孟浪:此句以下《云笈七签》无,另有异文四百八十七字。 13元:疑为『兀』之
Interpretation

The collation notes at the end of the Yangsheng Bianyi Jue are as follows. With regard to the character 先, the Yunji Qiqian has an additional 须 here. The character 求 is written as 未 in the Yunji Qiqian. The sentence 徒广虚论功条,其摄养之效 appears in the Yunji Qiqian as 徒广虚论之功,终无摄养之效. The character 误 is given as 悟, and 惑 as 或. Following 愍, the Yunji Qiqian adds a 然, and following 恍 it adds a 惚. 人问 is rendered 凡问 in that text.

The sentence 皆有不食之功,身轻之效 is written 皆有不食轻举之效 in the Yunji Qiqian, meaning that all possess the efficacy of abstaining from food together with lightness of body and the ability to rise up. The character 减 remains 减. The original text has 所, which has been corrected to 不 on the authority of the Yunji Qiqian. Starting from the phrase 妄作人问之孟浪, the subsequent material is not included in the Yunji Qiqian; that work instead contains a variant passage amounting to four hundred eighty-seven characters. The character 元 is suspected to be an erroneous form of 兀.

误。

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback