中文 · EN

《唐玄宗御制道德真经疏》Vol. 1

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 Vol. 1 / 4 25,000 characters

About this page. The original text of 《唐玄宗御制道德真经疏》 Vol. 1 (Taixuan 太玄部, 4 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 55 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《唐玄宗御制道德真经疏》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

唐玄宗御制道德真经疏 > 经名:唐玄宗御制道德真经疏,收录于《中华道藏》道德真经。 唐玄宗御制道德真经疏释题 老子者,太上玄元皇帝之内号也。玄玄道宗,降生伊亳,肃肃皇祖,命氏我唐。垂俗之训,无疆之祉,长发远祥,系本瓜瓞。其出处之迹,方册备记。道家以为玉晨应号,马迁谓之隐君子,而仲尼师之。翻经中其大谩问礼,叹乎龙德,是孔丘无间然矣。 在周室久之,将导西极,关令尹喜请着书,於是演二篇焉。明道德生畜之源,罔不尽此,而其要在是孔丘无间然矣。
Interpretation

Laozi was the inner honorific title of the Supreme Lord, the Dark Origin Emperor. The master of the profound and far-reaching Dao was born in the region of Yi and Bo. His dignified and venerable forebear was destined to bear the surname Li, becoming the founder of our Great Tang. He left teachings to guide the world and brought boundless blessings. Auspicious fortune endured through the ages, its generations succeeding one another like fruit on a spreading vine. The classic texts already record the details of his life and deeds.

Daoists call Laozi “Jade Dawn” (Yuchen) when he manifests in response to the world. Sima Qian described him as a reclusive gentleman, and Confucius once studied under him. While consulting the classics, Confucius recorded the breadth and depth of Laozi’s discussions of ritual, and praised his De (Virtue) for being as elusive and transformative as a dragon’s. This shows that Confucius had no criticism of Laozi.

Laozi lived for many years in the Zhou dynasty. Later, he prepared to travel west to the frontier regions to spread the Dao. Yin Xi, the guardian of the pass, asked him to write a book, so Laozi composed the two-part Dao De Jing, explaining how the Dao and De give rise to and nurture the myriad things. Nothing of these teachings is left unaddressed in the book, and their most essential meaning is contained within it.

在周室久之,将导西极,关令尹喜请着书,於是演二篇焉。明道德生畜之源,罔不尽此,而其要在乎理身理国。理国则绝矜尚华薄,以无为不言为教,故经曰:道常无为而无不为,侯王若能守,万物将自化。又曰:我无为而人自化,我无事而人自富,我好静而人自正,我无欲而人自朴。理身则少私寡欲,以虚心实腹为务。故经曰:常无欲以观其妙,又曰:不贵难得之货,不见可欲,又曰:塞其兑,闭其门,挫其锐,解其纷。而皆守之以柔弱雌静,故经曰:柔胜刚,弱胜强,又曰:知其雄,守其雌,此其大旨也。及乎穷理尽性,闭缘息想,处实行权,坐忘遗照,损之又损,玄之又玄,此殆不可得而言传者矣。其教圆,其文约,其旨畅,其言迩,故游其廊麻者,皆自以为升堂睹奥,及研精覃思,然后知其於秋毫殆不可得而言传者矣。其教圆,其文约,其旨畅,其言迩,故游其廊麻者,皆自以为升堂睹奥,及研精覃思,然后知其於秋毫之端,万分未得其一也。
Interpretation

After serving as an official in the Zhou dynasty for many years, Laozi prepared to travel to the western frontier. Yin Xi, the keeper of the pass, asked him to write a book. Laozi then composed two parts, the Dao Jing and the De Jing, setting out the source of the Dao, De, and the growth and nurturing of all things. The book addresses everything comprehensively, but its main concerns are cultivating oneself and governing the state.

To govern the state, one should abandon self-importance, boasting, and superficial display, and use Wuwei (non-action) and few words as means of instruction. Thus the text says: “The Dao always follows its own nature, yet nothing is left undone. If the lords and kings could hold fast to this principle, all things would transform and grow of themselves.” It also says: “When I do not act recklessly, the people transform themselves; when I do not meddle, the people become prosperous of themselves; when I cherish stillness, the people set themselves right; when I have no desires, the people return to simplicity.”

To cultivate oneself, one should lessen selfishness and restrain desire, making an empty mind and inner fullness one’s chief aims. Thus the text says: “Always remain free of desire, and you will observe the subtlety of the Dao.” It also says: “Do not prize rare goods, and do not display things that stir desire.” And: “Close the openings of the senses and shut the gates through which outside temptations enter; blunt the sharpness and untangle the confusion.” Both self-cultivation and governing the state should take softness, humility, and stillness as their principles. Thus the text says: “The soft overcomes the hard; the weak overcomes the strong.” It also says: “Know strength, yet hold to weakness.” This is the general meaning of the book.

As for fathoming the principles of things and fully realizing one’s nature, severing external ties and quieting scattered thoughts, applying the teachings flexibly in practice, sitting in meditation and forgetting oneself, dispelling the images reflected in the mind, and reducing step by step until one enters the realm of mystery upon mystery—these matters can scarcely be conveyed in words. Laozi’s teachings are all-encompassing, their writing concise, their meaning clear, and their language plain. For this reason, first-time readers often think they have already entered the heart of the teaching. Only after studying it deeply and reflecting on it repeatedly do they understand that even something as fine as an autumn hair is almost impossible to describe, and that what they have grasped is less than one ten-thousandth.

经曰:有物混成,先天地生,吾不知其名,字之曰道,强为之名曰大,故知大道者虚极妙本之强名,名其通生也。庄子曰:太初有无,有无者,言有此妙无也。又曰:无有无名,无名者,未立强名也,故经曰:无名天地之始。强名通生曰道,故经曰:有名万物之母。庄子又曰:物得以生谓之德,德,得也,言天地万变,旁通品物,皆资妙本者,未立强名也,故经曰:无名天地之始。强名通生曰道,故经曰:有名万物之母。庄子又曰:物得以生谓之德,德,得也,言天地万变,旁通品物,皆资妙本而以生成。得生为德,故经曰:道生之,德畜之,则知道者德之体,德者道之用也。 而经分上下者,先明道而德之次也。然体用之名,可散也,体用之实,不可散也,故经曰:同出而异名,同谓之玄,语其出则分而为二,咨其同则混而为一,故曰可散而不可散也。则上经曰:是谓玄德,又曰:孔德之容,又曰:德者同於德,又曰:常德不离,下经曰:失道而后德,又曰:反者道之动,又曰:道生一,又曰:大道甚夷,是知体用互陈,递明精要,不必定名於上下也。
Interpretation

There is a unified existence that was already present before Heaven and Earth took shape. I do not know its original name, so I gave it the courtesy name “Dao.” Forced to name it, I call it “the Great.” Thus “Great Dao” is merely a makeshift name for what is supremely still and empty, mysterious, and fundamental. The name “Dao” describes how it runs through all things and enables them to come into being.

The Zhuangzi says, “At the beginning, there was nothing.” Here, “nothing” refers to the mysterious emptiness. It also says, “There was neither being nor name,” meaning that at that time no makeshift names had yet been established. Hence the Daodejing says, “The nameless is the beginning of Heaven and Earth.” Later, it was provisionally called the Dao that runs through all things, so the text also says, “The named is the mother of the myriad things.”

The Zhuangzi also says, “That by which the myriad things come into being is called De.” Here, De means “to receive.” The many transformations between Heaven and Earth and the arising of all things depend on that mysterious foundation. All things receive life from it; this is called De. Therefore the Daodejing says, “The Dao gives them life; De nourishes them.” We can see from this that Dao is the foundation of De, and De is the expression of Dao’s activity.

The Daodejing is divided into two parts, the upper and lower, because it discusses Dao first and De afterward. Yet the terms “substance” and “function” can be distinguished in speech, while the foundation and activity they refer to cannot truly be separated. Hence the text says, “They emerge together but have different names; together they are called the mysterious.” In the names by which they appear, they seem to be two; in their common source, they form an undivided whole. This is what it means to say that their names can be distinguished, but their foundation cannot be divided.

Thus, the upper part says, “This is called profound De,” as well as “the form of great De,” “Those who possess De are one with De,” and “constant De does not depart.” The lower part says, “Only after losing the Dao does one have De,” “Reversal is the movement of the Dao,” “The Dao gives birth to the One,” and “The Great Dao is very level.” From this we can see that the text alternates between discussing Dao as foundation and De as its activity, gradually making their meaning clear. There is no need to confine these topics rigidly to one part or the other.

经,而后德,又曰:反者道之动,又曰:道生一,又曰:大道甚夷,是知体用互陈,递明精要,不必定名於上下也。 经,径也,言通径也,又常也,言通径常行之道。每惟圣祖垂训,贻厥孙谋,听理之余,伏勤讲读,今复一二诠疏其要妙者,书不尽言,粗举大纲,以裨助学者尔。 2-唐玄宗御制道德真经疏卷之一 唐玄宗御制道德真经疏卷之一 道可道章第一 此章明妙本之由起,万化之宗源。首标虚极之强名,将明众妙之归趋。故可道可名者,明体用也。无名有名者,明本迹也。无欲有欲者,明两观也。同出异名者,明朴散而为器也。同谓之玄者,明成器而复朴也。玄之又玄者,辩兼忘也。众妙之门者,示了出也。所谓进修之阶渐,体悟之大方也。 道可道,非常道。 疏:道者,虚极妙本之强名,训通器而复朴也。玄之又玄者,辩兼忘也。众妙之门者,示了出也。所谓进修之阶渐,体悟之大方也。 道可道,非常道。 疏:道者,虚极妙本之强名,训通训径,首一字标宗也。可道者,言此妙本通生万物,是万物之由径,可称为道,故云可道。非常道者,妙本生化,用无定方,强为之名,不可遍举,故或大、或逝,或远、或近,是不常於一道也,故云非常道。 名可名,非常名。
Interpretation

“Dao” is an imperfect name for the ultimate emptiness and stillness, the subtle source of all things. The character “Dao” also means passage or road; it is used at the opening to point to the purpose of the whole text. “The Dao that can be spoken of” means that this subtle source runs through and brings forth the myriad things: it is the way from which they all come, and so it can be called the Dao. “It is not the constant Dao” means that its activity in bringing forth the myriad things has no fixed form. “Dao” is only an imperfect name and cannot encompass all the ways it manifests. At times it appears vast; at others, it moves without ceasing, seems distant, or feels close. It does not always take the same form.

A “name” that can be spoken is not a constant, unchanging name.

疏:名者,称谓即物,得道用之名,首一字亦标宗也。可名者,言名生於用,可与立名也。非常名者,在天则曰清,在地则曰宁,得一虽不殊,约用则名异,是不常於一名也,故云非常名。 无名,天地之始。 疏:无名者,万化未作,无强名也。故《庄子》曰:太初有无,无有无名,但其妙本降气,开辟天地,天地相资,以为名者,万化未作,无强名也。故《庄子》曰:太初有无,无有无名,但其妙本降气,开辟天地,天地相资,以为本始,故云无名天地之始。则《易》之太极生两仪也。注云权舆者,按:《尔雅》云:权舆,始也。 有名,万物之母。 疏:有名者,应用匠成,有强名也。万化既作,品物生成,妙本旁通,以资人用,由其茂养,故谓之母也,母以茂养为义。然则无名有名者,圣人约用以明本迹之同异,而道不系於有名无名也。 故常无欲以观其妙,常有欲以观其徼。 疏:欲者性之动,谓逐境而生心也。言人常无欲,正性清静,反照道源,则观见妙本矣。其徼。
Interpretation

A “name” is a designation given to a thing. Those who have attained the Dao also use names; the first character of a scripture’s opening line can likewise indicate the central theme of the whole work. “Can be named” means that when something functions, it can be given a name. “Not a constant, unchanging name” means that when the Dao of “attaining the One” operates in Heaven, it is called “clarity”; when it operates on Earth, it is called “stillness.” The Dao itself does not differ, but its name varies according to how it functions. So it cannot be said to have just one fixed name forever.

The nameless is the beginning of Heaven and Earth.

“The nameless” refers to the state before the transformations of the myriad things had begun, when nothing had yet been forced into words and names. The Zhuangzi says, “At the Great Beginning, there was nonbeing.” In this primordial state, there were neither distinct things nor names. The subtle essence of the Dao gives rise to primordial Qi, opening up Heaven and Earth. Heaven and Earth depend on each other and become the starting point for the myriad things; hence the saying, “The nameless is the beginning of Heaven and Earth.” This corresponds to the Book of Changes, in which the Supreme Ultimate gives rise to the Two Forms. In the commentary, the term “origin” means “beginning,” according to the Erya.

The named is the mother of the myriad things.

“The named” refers to the Dao’s functioning and bringing things into being, at which point they can be referred to by names. As transformations unfold and the various kinds of things come into being, the Dao’s subtle essence runs through them for people to draw upon. It continually nourishes the myriad things, and so is called the “mother.” Here, “mother” carries the sense of nurturing and flourishing. Yet “the nameless” and “the named” are simply distinctions the sage uses, based on function, to explain the essence and its manifestations. The Dao itself is not constrained by being “named” or “nameless.”

Therefore, one should remain free of desire in order to perceive the Dao’s subtlety, and remain in a state of desire in order to observe the boundaries of things.

“Desire” is a thought that arises when human nature is stirred—in other words, when the mind is drawn out by external things. When a person is often free of desire, the mind and nature become quiet; turning inward to contemplate the source of the Dao, one can perceive its subtle essence. “Boundary” refers to the limits and signs that appear when things manifest.

疏:欲者性之动,谓逐境而生心也。言人常无欲,正性清静,反照道源,则观见妙本矣。若有欲,逐境生心,则性为欲乱。以欲观本,既失冲和,但见边徼矣。徼,边也。又解云:欲者思存之谓,言欲有所思存而立教也。常无欲者,谓法清静,离於言说,无所思存,则见道之微妙也。常有欲者,谓从本起用,因言立教,应物遂通,化成天下,则见众之所归趋矣。徼,归也。 此两者同出而异名, 疏:此者,指上事也。两者,谓可道、可名,无名、有名,无欲、有欲,各自其两,故云两者。俱禀妙本,故云自本而降,随用立名,可名,无名、有名,无欲、有欲,各自其两,故云两者。俱禀妙本,故云自本而降,随用立名,则名异矣。 同谓之玄。 疏:玄,深妙也。自出而论则名异,是从本而降迹也。自同而论则深妙,是摄迹以归本也。归本则深妙,故谓之玄。 玄之又玄,众妙之门。
Interpretation

Desire is the thought that arises when one’s nature and feelings are stirred by things outside oneself. When people are often free of desire, their inner nature becomes quiet and clear, allowing them to turn inward and observe the source of the Dao. They can then see the subtle root. When desire arises in response to the surrounding world, however, one’s nature is disturbed. Observing the root with desire, one loses peace and can see only the outer limits of things. “Jiao” means boundary.

Another interpretation takes “desire” to mean having thoughts or concerns in the mind. When the mind holds thoughts and concerns, people establish teachings on that basis. To be often free of desire means to follow the Dao of quiet clarity, leave behind distinctions made through words, and hold nothing in the mind; in this way, one can realize the Dao’s subtlety. To be often subject to desire means that the Dao’s root expresses itself in action, using words to establish teachings, responding to all things and making their principles clear. Through teaching the world, one helps people each find their proper place. “Jiao” can also mean a destination or direction of return.

In the phrase “these two arise from the same source but have different names,” “these two” refers to the things mentioned earlier. What can be explained in words and what can be named, the nameless and the named, the state without desire and the state with desire: each forms a pair, which is why they are called “two.” All come from the subtle root. They emerge from that root and receive different names according to how they function.

“They are the same; both are called profound.” “Profound” means deep and subtle. Seen in terms of their manifest functions, they have different names: this is the root expressing itself outward. Seen in terms of their shared root, they are deep and subtle: this is gathering the many manifestations back into the root. Returning to the root is what makes them profound, and so they are called “profound.”

Within the profound lies something still more profound: it is the gateway through which all subtle principles unfold.

疏:摄迹归本,谓之深妙,若住斯妙,其迹复存,与彼异名,等无差别。故寄又玄以遣玄,欲令不滞於玄,本迹两忘,是名无住,无住则了出矣。注云:意因不生者,《西升经》云:同出异名色,各自生意因。今不生意因,是同於玄妙。无欲於无欲者,为生欲心,故求无欲。欲求无欲,未离欲心。今既无有欲,亦无无欲,遣之又遣,可谓意因。今不生意因,是同於玄妙。无欲於无欲者,为生欲心,故求无欲。欲求无欲,未离欲心。今既无有欲,亦无无欲,遣之又遣,可谓都忘。正观若斯,是为众妙。其妙虽众,若出此门,故云众妙之门也。 天下皆知章第二 前章明妙本生化入两观之不同,此章明朴散异因万殊而逐境,逐境则流浪,善化则归根,故首标美善妄情,次示有无倾夺,结以圣人之理,冀达还淳之由。 天下皆知美之为美,斯恶已。皆知善之为善,斯不善矣。
Interpretation

“Gathering the traces and returning to the root” means drawing all external manifestations back to their source; this is called profound subtlety. But if one clings to this “subtlety,” external manifestations will arise again. It is no different from the various terms discussed earlier. Thus “again mysterious” is used to dissolve attachment to the “mysterious,” so that one does not remain caught in it and lets go of both root and trace. This is called “abiding nowhere”: clinging to no state at all. From this, one can awaken fully and transcend.

The commentary says, “the causes of intention do not arise”: the causes that give rise to thoughts and distinctions no longer arise. The Scripture of the Western Ascension says, “They emerge together, yet have different names and forms; each gives rise to the grounds for intention.” Now that discriminating thoughts no longer arise, one is in accord with the mysterious and subtle.

“To have no desire for desirelessness” means that a person seeks desirelessness in order to bring about a state of having no desires. But as long as one is still seeking desirelessness, one has not left desire behind. Now there is neither desire nor attachment to “desirelessness”; one sets things aside layer by layer until everything is forgotten. This is what is meant by “the causes of intention do not arise”; it may also be called complete forgetfulness. To contemplate in accordance with this right view is to enter “the many mysteries.” Though the mysterious and subtle take many forms, they all emerge through this gate; hence it is called “the gate of the many mysteries.”

Chapter Two: When All Under Heaven Know

The previous chapter explained how the root of the mysterious and subtle gives rise to change, and how two ways of contemplation differ. This chapter explains how, once the Dao’s undivided simplicity is dispersed, it appears in myriad differences for various reasons, leading people to pursue external things. Pursuing external things brings continual drift, while skillful teaching can guide people back to the root. The chapter therefore begins by pointing out that people’s judgments of beauty and goodness arise from deluded distinctions. It then explains how being and nonbeing contend with each other, and concludes with the principles of the sage, hoping that people will understand how to return to simplicity.

When everyone under heaven recognizes beauty as beauty, ugliness appears alongside it. When everyone under heaven recognizes goodness as goodness, what is called evil appears alongside it.

疏:天下者,举大凡而言,凡在天覆之下也。美者,心所甘美也。善者,身所履行也。言天下之人,皆知以己心所甘美者为美,己身所履行者为善,故论甘则忌辛,好丹则非素,共相倾夺,竞起是非,皆由兴动於欲心,所以,己身所履行者为善,故论甘则忌辛,好丹则非素,共相倾夺,竞起是非,皆由兴动於欲心,所以递成乎美恶。圣人知美恶无主,俱是妄情,妄情则不常,故云恶已。已,语助也。注云:神奇臭腐者,《庄子》云:所美为神奇,所恶为臭腐。 故有无之相生, 疏:此明有无性空也。夫有不自有,因无而有,凡俗则以为无生有。无不自无,因有而无,凡俗则以为有生无,故云相生。而有无对法,本不相生,相生之名,犹妄执起。如美恶非自性生,是皆空故,圣人将欲救其迷滞,是以历言六者之惑。 难易之相成, 疏:此明难易法空也。此以难而彼成易,此以易而彼成难,是以历言六者之惑。 难易之相成, 疏:此明难易法空也。此以难而彼成易,此以易而彼成难,亦如工者易於木,难於埴。陶匠易於埴而难於木,故云难易之相成。若同其所难,则无易。同其所易,则无难。难易无实,妄生名称,是法空。故能了之者,巧拙两忘,则难易名息,亦如美恶无定故也。 长短之相形,
Interpretation

The world, broadly speaking, means all people within the expanse covered by Heaven. What people find pleasing to the heart is called “beautiful”; what they do and put into practice is called “good.” In other words, people everywhere take what they like in their hearts to be beautiful and what they personally practice to be good. Thus, when speaking of sweet flavors, they disparage what is pungent; when they favor red, they look down on white. People contend with one another and compete to judge what is right and wrong because desire stirs in the heart, and so beauty and ugliness arise one after another.

The sage knows that beauty and ugliness have no fixed authority; both come from deluded feelings and thoughts. Since these feelings and thoughts are deluded, they cannot remain constant. Hence the phrase “the ugliness has passed.” Here, “passed” is a grammatical particle. The commentary’s phrase “the wondrous and the putrid” comes from the Zhuangzi: people regard what they consider beautiful as wondrous and what they dislike as putrid.

Being and nonbeing give rise to one another,

Commentary: This explains that the nature of both being and nonbeing is empty. “Being” does not exist independently; it appears through “nonbeing,” so ordinary people assume that nonbeing can produce being. “Nonbeing,” too, does not exist independently; it appears through “being,” so ordinary people assume that being can produce nonbeing. That is why the two are said to “give rise to one another.” In fact, although being and nonbeing stand in opposition, neither truly produces the other. Their supposed mutual arising is merely an account formed through deluded thoughts and attachment. Likewise, beauty and ugliness do not arise from any fixed nature, because both are empty. The sage wishes to free people from confusion and attachment, and therefore explains these six kinds of mistaken understanding one by one.

Difficulty and ease take shape in relation to one another,

Commentary: This explains that the principle of difficulty and ease is also empty. What is difficult for one person may be easy for another, and the reverse is also true.

Difficulty and ease take shape in relation to one another,

Commentary: This explains that the principle of difficulty and ease is also empty. What is difficult for one person may be easy for another. For example, a carpenter finds it easy to work with wood but difficult to work with clay, while a potter finds clay easy to work with and wood difficult. Thus difficulty and ease take shape in relation to one another. If everyone faced the same difficulty, there would be no such thing as ease; if everyone faced the same ease, there would be no such thing as difficulty. Difficulty and ease have no fixed substance; they are merely names people assign. This is what is meant by the emptiness of phenomena: things and the names by which they are known have no fixed, unchanging nature. Those who understand this no longer cling to skill and clumsiness, and the labels of difficulty and ease fall away. The same is true of the absence of any fixed standard for beauty and ugliness.

Long and short appear in relation to one another,

疏:此明长短相空也。以长故形短,以短故形长,故云长短相形。亦如凫胫非短,由鹤胫之长,故续之则忧。鹤胫非长,由凫胫之短,故断之则悲。见短长相,犹如美恶,既无定礼,皆是妄情。 高下之相倾, 疏:此明高下名空也。高下两名,互相倾夺,故称高必因於下,又有高之者,称下必因於高,又有下之者。又高则所高非高,又下则所下非下。如彼世间,几诸有名位,递为臣妾,亦复无常,是皆空故,故无定位。 音声之相和, 疏:此明和合下则所下非下。如彼世间,几诸有名位,递为臣妾,亦复无常,是皆空故,故无定位。 音声之相和, 疏:此明和合空也。五音相和,成曲者谁?总彼众声,则能度曲。如世间法,皆和合成,则体非真,是皆空故,将欲定其美恶,岂云达观之谈? 前后之相随。 疏:此明三时念空也。日月相代,代故以新,如彼投足,孰为前后?则前后之称,由相随立名。名由妄立,谁识其初?过去未来,及以见在,三时空故,念念迁故,亦如美恶无定名也。 是以圣人处无为之事,行不言之教。
Interpretation

This passage explains that distinctions such as long and short, high and low, sounds and silences, and what comes before or after only take shape through comparison or connection. They have no fixed, unchanging standard.

Long and short are relative: something appears short because there is something long, and long because there is something short. A wild duck’s legs are not short by nature; they only seem short beside a crane’s. Nor are a crane’s legs absolutely long; they only seem long beside a wild duck’s. If you lengthened a wild duck’s legs, it would be distressed; if you shortened a crane’s, the crane would grieve. People judge length and shortness much as they judge beauty and ugliness: their standards are not fixed, but often arise from feelings and distinctions.

High and low are also relative. Something is called high because there is something lower than it, and something is called low because there is something higher. If we keep asking what truly counts as high or low, we find that these terms have no fixed standard. Positions in the world also change: someone who holds a high position today may occupy a low one later, and people’s ranks can shift in relation to one another. This shows that high and low have no permanent place.

Different sounds must blend together to form a melody. A tune does not come from any single sound alone, but from many sounds joined together. Things in the world, too, often arise from the coming together of various conditions, and so have no independent, unchanging substance. To insist on assigning them fixed judgments of beauty or ugliness is not a clear-sighted view.

What comes before and after is named according to sequence and succession. The sun and moon take turns, and each new day follows the one before it. When a person takes a step, which step counts as the first or the next depends on the observer and the order of events. Before and after are names that arise from relationships; they have no fixed starting point of their own. The three periods of time—past, future, and present—are constantly changing and flowing from moment to moment, so they, too, have no permanently fixed names.

Therefore, the sage handles affairs through Wuwei (non-action) and teaches without relying on words.

疏:是以者,说下以明上也。夫饰智诈者,虽拱默非无为也。任真素者,则终日指撝,而未始不晏然矣。故圣人知诸法性空,自无矜执,则理天下者当绝浮伪,任用纯德,百姓化之,各安其始不晏然矣。故圣人知诸法性空,自无矜执,则理天下者当绝浮伪,任用纯德,百姓化之,各安其分。各安其分则不扰,岂非无为之事乎。言出於己,皆因天下之心,则终身言,未尝言,岂非不言之教耶。 万物作而不辞, 疏:作犹动也,辞为辞谢也。言圣人善化,无事无为,百姓不知,爰游爰豫,各自得其动作,而不辞谢於圣人。故击壤鼓腹,而忘帝力,此人忘圣功也。 生而不有,为而不恃,功成而不居。 疏:令物各得成全其生理,圣人不以为己有。令物各得其营为,圣人不恃为己功。如此太平之功,弘济日远,犹且慎终如始,不敢宁居。此圣人自忘其功。注云:日慎一日《尚书》文也。 夫惟不居,是以不去。 疏:彼圣人不恃为己功。如此太平之功,弘济日远,犹且慎终如始,不敢宁居。此圣人自忘其功。注云:日慎一日《尚书》文也。 夫惟不居,是以不去。 疏:彼圣人者,稠直如发,慎终如始,本末不衰,未尝宁居而逸豫,是以日新其盛德,忘功而功不去,光宅而天下安,故云夫惟不居,是以不去。
Interpretation

Thus Laozi uses the following words to clarify the meaning of the passage above: Those who deliberately show off their cleverness and practice deceit cannot be said to embody Wuwei (non-action), even if they sit silently. Those who preserve their natural simplicity can remain inwardly at ease even while directing and carrying out affairs all day. The sage understands that the nature of all things is empty, and so does not cling to them or boast. To govern the world, one should therefore cast aside ostentation and falsehood and employ people of sincere and generous virtue. The people are transformed by example, each content in their place and undisturbed. Is this not Wuwei? The sage’s words accord with the hearts of people everywhere; so even when speaking throughout a lifetime, it is as though nothing had been said. Is this not teaching without words?

All things arise and act, and the sage does not interfere.

“Act” means to be active; “decline” means to refuse or decline. The sage is skilled at teaching without deliberately imposing his will, yet the people do not recognize that their accomplishments are due to him. They live freely and at ease, each attending to their own affairs, and feel no need to thank the sage. Thus people beat the earth drum and pat their bellies as they sing, forgetting the ruler’s beneficence. This describes the people forgetting the sage’s virtue and merit.

The sage gives life to all things without claiming them as his own. He acts without relying on his accomplishments, and completes his work without taking credit for it.

The sage allows all things to follow their own nature and grow, without treating them as his possessions. He enables each thing to fulfill its purpose, without claiming its achievements as his own. Even when peace prevails throughout the world and blessings reach far and wide, the sage remains as cautious as at the beginning, never daring to grow complacent or slack. This is what it means for the sage to forget his own accomplishments. The commentary’s phrase “be more cautious each day” comes from the Book of Documents (Shangshu) and means to grow more cautious with each passing day.

Precisely because he takes no credit, his accomplishments do not disappear.

The sage does not claim merit as his own. Even as the achievements of peace continue to grow and its blessings spread ever farther, he remains as cautious as at the beginning, never daring to become complacent. This is what it means to forget one’s merit so that one’s accomplishments endure.

The sage is upright and steadfast in conduct, cautious from beginning to end, never slackening and never seeking ease or pleasure. His De (virtue) therefore grows day by day. Though he takes no credit, his accomplishments do not disappear; his beneficence extends throughout the world and brings it peace. Thus it is said: precisely because he takes no credit, his accomplishments do not disappear.

不尚贤章第三 前章明万殊逐境,善化则归根,此章明贵尚不行,无为则至理。首标不尚,绝矜徇之迹。次云圣理,示立教之方,结以无为,明化成而复朴也。 不尚贤,使民不争。 疏:尚,崇贵也。贤,才能,绝矜徇之迹。次云圣理,示立教之方,结以无为,明化成而复朴也。 不尚贤,使民不争。 疏:尚,崇贵也。贤,才能也。言人君崇贵才能则有进,饰伪者徇迹而失真,失真叉是尚贤之由,徇迹定起交争之弊。不若陶之玄化,任以无为,使云自从龙,风常随虎,则唐虞在上,不乏元凯之臣,伊吕升朝,自得台衡之望。各当其分,人无觊觎,则不争也。 不贵难得之货,使民不为盗。 疏:人之受生,所禀有分,则所禀材器是身货宝,分外妄求,求不可得,故云难得。夫不安性分,希慕聪明,且失天真,尽成私盗。今使贤愚袭性,可否用情,既无越分之求,自轻难得之货。皆得性分,谁为盗乎?故《庄子》曰:不仁之仁,窃性命之情,而饕富贵。又解云:以人君。今使贤愚袭性,可否用情,既无越分之求,自轻难得之货。皆得性分,谁为盗乎?故《庄子》曰:不仁之仁,窃性命之情,而饕富贵。又解云:以人君不贵珠犀宝贝,则其政清静,故百姓化之,自绝贪取,人各知足,故不为盗。
Interpretation

This chapter explains that when the worthy are not deliberately exalted and rare goods are not treated as precious, people are less inclined to compete and steal. Governance should follow the natural course, allowing people to return to simplicity.

“Esteem” means to honor, and “worthy” refers to people with ability. If a ruler deliberately elevates the able, people may try to win rank and recognition by embellishing themselves and pursuing fame. They gradually lose their true nature and are more likely to compete with one another. If a ruler guides the people through Wuwei (non-action), allowing each person to rest content in their proper place, things can proceed with the natural momentum of wind following the tiger and clouds following the dragon. Even in the reigns of Tang Yao and Yu Shun, worthy ministers served as their aides; Yi Yin and Lü Shang, too, were appointed to important posts at court. When everyone is content with their proper place and does not presumptuously seek more than their share, conflict naturally diminishes.

“Hard-to-obtain goods” refers to scarce and precious possessions. Each person has their own gifts and proper place. If people are not content with what they have and covet what lies beyond their share, they lose their natural simplicity and become consumed by desire. If people are allowed to follow their own nature and make full use of their abilities, they will have little desire to overstep their place and will not attach excessive value to rare goods. The text cites the Zhuangzi, which says that some practices that appear benevolent can in fact steal away people’s natural character and genuine nature, making them covet wealth and status. Another interpretation is that when rulers do not regard pearls, jade, and other treasures as precious, government becomes calm and the people are influenced in turn, with fewer desires for gain. When everyone knows contentment, they will not resort to theft.

不见可欲,使心不乱。 疏:希慕聪明,是见可欲。欲心兴动,非乱而何?今既不崇贵贤能,亦不妄求越分,则不见可欲之事,而心不惑乱也。 是以圣人之治, 疏:圣人治国理身,以为教本。夫理国者,复何为乎?但理身尔。故虚心实腹,绝欲忘知,於为无为,则无不理矣。 虚其心, 疏:夫役心逐境,则尘事汨昏,静虑全真,则情欲不作。情欲不作,则心虚矣。《庄子》曰:虚室生白,谓心虚则纯白独生也,故曰虚其心。 实其腹, 疏:腹者,含受之义,足则不贪,欲使道德内充,不生贪爱,故云实其腹。注云属厌而心。 实其腹, 疏:腹者,含受之义,足则不贪,欲使道德内充,不生贪爱,故云实其腹。注云属厌而止者,春秋间没汝宽谏魏献子辞也,欲以小人之腹,为君子之心,属厌则足而不食也。 弱其志, 疏:志者,心之事,事在心曰志。欲令心有所行,皆守柔弱,故知心虚则志弱矣。 强其骨。 疏:骨者,体之干,既其道德内充,常无贪取,不贪则腹实,腹实则自骨强矣。 常使民无知无欲, 疏:圣人所以行虚心实腹之教者,常欲使百姓无争尚之知,贪求之欲,令其自化尔。 使夫知者不敢为也。
Interpretation

When people stop chasing things that invite covetousness, their minds are no longer disturbed. Admiring cleverness and competing to display one’s abilities means seeing something to covet. Once desire arises, the mind naturally becomes unsettled. The sage does not glorify the pursuit of fame and profit or encourage people to seek recklessly for things beyond their proper station. People then encounter fewer things that stir greed, and their minds are no longer confused or disordered.

So the sage makes this the foundation of instruction both in governing the state and in cultivating oneself. What, then, is needed to govern the state? In the end, it is self-cultivation. Make the mind empty and still, make life sufficient, cut off excessive desires, set aside clever schemes, and follow nature without acting recklessly: then nothing will be left poorly governed.

“To empty the mind” means that when people are led along by external things, their thoughts are obscured by the disturbances of worldly life. If they can quiet the mind and preserve their true nature, desires and passions will not arise. When they do not arise, the mind naturally becomes empty and still. The Zhuangzi says, “In an empty room, brightness is born.” This means that when the mind is open and clear, one’s pure nature comes into view.

“To fill the belly”: here, “belly” conveys the sense of being full and having enough. When people feel content, they are less likely to covet more. When De is made abundant within, covetous desire does not arise. The commentary also cites the saying, “Stop when you are satisfied.” It means that when you have eaten enough, you stop and do not greedily eat more. These words come from the counsel given by Mo Rukuan to Wei Xianzi during the Spring and Autumn period, and are used to explain that people should know when they have enough.

“To weaken the will”: here, “will” means what the mind is set on or plans to pursue. It means making people’s aims gentle and humble, without stubbornly insisting on showing strength. When the mind is empty and still, the will too will not become domineering and grasping.

“To strengthen the bones”: the bones are the body’s supporting frame. When De is abundant within, people do not take greedily and are content with their lives; the body’s foundation is therefore strong.

The sage promotes the teaching of emptying the mind and filling the belly in the hope that the people will not compete through cleverness or give rise to covetous desires, and will be able to change naturally for the better. In this way, even those already skilled in cunning will not dare to use it recklessly.

疏:夫无知无欲者,已清静也。则使夫有知者渐陶淳化,不敢为徇迹贪求,而无为也。 为无为,则无不治矣。 疏:夫得其性而为之,虽为而无为也。且绝尚贤之迹,不求难得之货,人因本分,物必全真,於为无为,复何矜徇化?既无馨而无臭,人故不识而不知,淳风大行性而为之,虽为而无为也。且绝尚贤之迹,不求难得之货,人因本分,物必全真,於为无为,复何矜徇化?既无馨而无臭,人故不识而不知,淳风大行,谁云不理? 道冲章第四 前章明贵尚不行,无为则至理。此章明妙本之用,在用而无为。首标道冲,示至虚之宗物,次云挫解,明冲用之释纷。又说和同之妙所在,不杂光尘,结以象帝之先,欲令尽知归趣尔。 道冲而用之,或不盈,渊兮似万物之宗。 疏:冲,虚也,谓道以冲虚为用也。夫和气冲虚,故为道用。用生万物令尽知归趣尔。 道冲而用之,或不盈,渊兮似万物之宗。 疏:冲,虚也,谓道以冲虚为用也。夫和气冲虚,故为道用。用生万物,物被其功。论功则物疑其光大,语冲则道曾不盈满,而妙本深静,常为万物之宗。云或似者,道非有法,故不正言尔,他皆仿此。 挫其锐,解其纷。
Interpretation

The function of the Dao is empty and boundless; however it is used, it can never be filled. It is deep and still, as though it were the source of all things.

“Emptiness” here means void and empty. The Dao acts through emptiness, and the harmonious Qi between Heaven and Earth also moves through stillness and emptiness, bringing forth all things. Everything receives its function from it. In terms of its effects, all things may seem bright and vast; viewed in terms of emptiness, however, the Dao is never full. It is deep and silent, always the source of all things. The scripture says “as though” because the Dao has no fixed form, so it is not described as having a definite, unchanging appearance.

Blunt the sharpness; untangle the confusion.

疏:挫,抑止也。锐,铦利也。解,释散也。纷,多扰也。冲虚之用,物莫之违,故铦利之心,多扰之事,念道冲和,自令抑止释散矣。此则约人以明道用。注云俗学求复者,《庄子□缮性篇》,故铦利之心,多扰之事,念道冲和,自令抑止释散矣。此则约人以明道用。注云俗学求复者,《庄子□缮性篇》云:缮性於俗,俗学以求复其初,言铦利纷扰,因欲而生,故念道则挫解,俗学则弥结矣。 和其光,同其尘,湛兮似或存。 疏:道之冲用,於物不遗,在光则与光为一,在尘则与尘为一。无所不在,所在常无。冲用则可混光尘,妙本则湛然不维,故云似或也。 吾不知谁之子,象帝之先。 疏:吾者,老君自称。象,似也。老君云:吾见至道冲用,生成万物,寻责所以,不测由来,既无湛然不维,故云似或也。 吾不知谁之子,象帝之先。 疏:吾者,老君自称。象,似也。老君云:吾见至道冲用,生成万物,寻责所以,不测由来,既无父道之人,故莫知道为谁子。生物必资於道,故似在乎帝先。注云帝者生物之主,《易》云:帝出乎震,辅嗣云:帝者,生物之主,兴益之宗也。又解云:兆见曰象,言此生物之帝,能兆见物象,故谓之象帝尔。 天地不仁章第五
Interpretation

“Dulling” means restraining; “sharpness” means keen and cutting; “dissolving” means dispersing; and “confusion” means turmoil. The Dao’s action is empty, still, and vast, and nothing can oppose it. Therefore, when people often contemplate the Dao’s balanced calm, they can rein in their competitive ambition and gradually quiet the turmoil in their affairs. This explains the Dao’s action through human self-cultivation.

A commentary says, “Worldly learning seeks restoration.” This comes from the “Cultivating Nature” chapter of the Zhuangzi: “Cultivate one’s nature amid the world, and rely on worldly learning to seek a return to one’s original state.” The meaning is that sharp ambition and restless confusion both arise from desire. When the mind rests on the Dao, turmoil dissolves; when one becomes immersed in worldly learning, entanglements instead deepen.

Dull the sharpness; dissolve the confusion. Be like light, without dazzling; be like dust, dwelling among all things. The Dao is deep and subtle: it seems to exist, yet is difficult to grasp.

The Dao’s action is empty, still, and universal, leaving nothing out. In the presence of light, it joins with light; in the world of dust, it blends with the world. It is everywhere, yet displays no fixed form. Its action can blend with light and dust, while its essential nature is deep, still, and unattached. That is why it is said to “seem to exist.”

“I do not know whose descendant the Dao is, yet it seems to have preceded the Thearch.”

Here, “I” is Lao Jun referring to himself, and “seems” means “appears to be.” Lao Jun says that he sees how the empty, still action of the Supreme Dao can generate the myriad things, but when he traces its origin, he cannot fathom it. The Dao is deep, still, and unattached, so its source cannot be identified; thus, he does not know what it is the source of. Yet the generation of the myriad things depends on the Dao, so the Dao seems to have existed before the Thearch.

The commentary explains that “Thearch” means the ruler who governs the generation and transformation of the myriad things. The Book of Changes says, “The Thearch emerges from Zhen,” and Wang Bi explains that the Thearch is the ruler who generates the myriad things and the source from which they flourish and grow. Another interpretation takes “appearing signs” to mean the manifestation of omens: the ruler of generation and transformation who manifests the forms of the myriad things is therefore called the “Image Thearch.”

Chapter Five: Heaven and Earth Are Not Benevolent

前章明妙本冲用,体用而无为。此章明兼爱成私,偏私则难普。首标刍狗尔。 天地不仁章第五 前章明妙本冲用,体用而无为。此章明兼爱成私,偏私则难普。首标刍狗万物,示天地之兼忘,次喻橐钥罔穷,明用虚而不挠。结以多言数屈,欲令必守中和。 天地不仁,以万物为刍狗。圣人不仁,以百姓为刍狗。 疏:仁者,兼爱之目也。刍,草也,谓结草为狗,以用祭祀也。《庄子》曰:师金谓颜回曰:夫刍狗之未陈,巾以文绣。及其已陈,则苏者取而爨之。今天地至仁,生成群物,亦如人结草为狗,不责其吠守之功,不以生成为仁恩,故云不仁也。则圣人在宥天下,视彼百姓,亦当如此尔。注云蔽盖之恩者,《礼记》孔子1曰:蔽盖不弃,为埋狗也其吠守之功,不以生成为仁恩,故云不仁也。则圣人在宥天下,视彼百姓,亦当如此尔。注云蔽盖之恩者,《礼记》孔子1曰:蔽盖不弃,为埋狗也。不独亲其亲者,《礼运》之文也。 天地之间,其犹橐钥乎?虚而不屈,动而愈出。
Interpretation

The previous chapter discussed the Dao’s profound nature and inexhaustible function, as well as following nature and governing through Wuwei (non-action). This chapter explains that favoring one side in one’s affection creates partiality and makes it difficult to extend that affection to everyone. It begins by comparing the world to straw dogs used in ritual sacrifice, showing that Heaven and Earth treat all things alike. It then compares the workings of Heaven and Earth to a bellows, whose emptiness and stillness allow its function to remain inexhaustible. Finally, it warns that excessive words can lead to frustration and counsels holding to balance.

“Heaven and Earth are not humane: they treat the myriad things as straw dogs. The sage is not humane: he treats the people as straw dogs.”

Here, “humane” refers to benevolence that extends universally, without distinguishing between those near and far. “Straw dogs” were figures made of straw and used in ancient sacrifices. Emperor Xuanzong of the Tang cites the Zhuangzi to explain that before a sacrifice, straw dogs were covered and adorned with embroidered cloths; after the ceremony, people took them apart and burned them as kindling. Heaven and Earth bring forth the myriad things without claiming to have done them a favor or asking them for anything in return. This is like people not imagining that a straw dog has earned merit by guarding the gate and barking simply because it was once used in a sacrifice. This is why Heaven and Earth are said to be “not humane.” A sage governing the people should act in the same way: not distributing kindness and favor to only some, but allowing the people to follow their own nature and live in peace. The commentary also cites the Book of Rites to explain that ancient people covered dogs when burying them. Its phrase “not loving only one’s own kin” points to the ideal in the “Liyun” chapter of the Book of Rites: loving more than just one’s own family.

“The space between Heaven and Earth—is it not like a bellows? Empty, yet never exhausted; set in motion, and ever more emerges.”

Is the space between Heaven and Earth not much like a bellows, an ancient device for blowing air? Though hollow inside, the bellows never run dry; once worked, they send out a steady stream of wind. The bellows here are a metaphor for the workings of Heaven and Earth: rooted in emptiness and stillness, they follow their natural course and bring forth life without end.

疏:橐,韛也,谓以皮为橐,鼓风以吹火也。钥,笛也,言天地能刍狗万物者,为其间空虚,故生成无私而不责望,亦犹橐之鼓,风,笛之运吹,常应求者,於我无情,故能虚之而不屈挠,动之愈出声气。以况人君虚心玄默,淳化均一,则无屈挠,日用不知,动而愈出也。 多言数穷,不如守中。 疏:多言者,多有兼爱之言也。多有兼爱之言,而行难遍,故数穷屈不遂,是知不如忘怀虚应,抱守中和,则自然皆足矣。注云不酬者,酬,答也,谓空有其言,而行不酬答。 谷神不死章第六 前章明兼爱成私,偏私则难普。此章明至虚而应,其应即不穷则自然皆足矣。注云不酬者,酬,答也,谓空有其言,而行不酬答。 谷神不死章第六 前章明兼爱成私,偏私则难普。此章明至虚而应,其应即不穷。首标谷神,寄神用以明道。次云玄牝,辨玄功之母物。结以绵绵微妙,玄示虚应,则不勤劳也。 谷神不死,是谓玄牝。 疏:谷神者,明谷之应声,似道之应物,有感即应,其应如神。神者不测之名,死以休息为义,不测之应,未尝休息,故云谷神不死。玄,深也。牝,母也。谷神之应,深妙难名,万物由其茂养,故云是谓玄牝。 玄牝之门,是谓天地根。
Interpretation

A “tuo” is a bellows, made of leather and used to fan a fire by blowing air into it. A “yue” is a flute. The passage says that Heaven and Earth can bring forth and nurture the myriad things without favoritism, just as a hollow bellows can send out air and a hollow flute can produce sound. They respond to the needs of whoever uses them, without private attachment to the myriad things. Thus, the more empty they are, the less their function is obstructed; the more they are worked, the more fully they give forth wind or sound.

This is a metaphor for a ruler who governs the world without bias, through a pure and generous transformation of De (Virtue/Power), while remaining open and composed. Such rule meets no obstruction. People are shaped by its influence in their daily lives, though they may not notice it. When the ruler acts, the influence of De continues to become evident.

Too much talk tends to bring obstacles at every turn. It is better to hold to the way of moderation.

The “many words” referred to here are words about caring for everyone. If one speaks at length but cannot put those words into practice in every circumstance, words and actions fall out of step, and affairs are hard to bring to completion. It is better, then, to set aside preconceptions and respond to things with an empty, still mind, holding to the way of moderation. In this way, everything can naturally be attended to fully. The commentary explains that “chou” means to respond. “Not responding” means that there are only empty words, with no corresponding action to carry them out.

Chapter Six: The Valley Spirit Never Dies

The previous chapter explained that care for all, when mixed with self-interest, leads to favoritism and cannot be practiced universally. This chapter explains that the utmost emptiness and stillness can respond to the myriad things naturally. Such responsiveness never runs out, and so the myriad things each find their proper place.

The opening introduces the “Valley Spirit,” using the function of a valley to explain how the Dao (the Way) operates. It then speaks of the “Mysterious Female,” describing the deep, subtle power of transformation as the mother of all things. Finally, it uses the image of something continuous and imperceptible to show how emptiness and stillness can respond without deliberate effort.

The Valley Spirit never dies; this is called the “Mysterious Female.”

“Valley Spirit” means that a valley answers sounds, just as the Great Dao responds to the myriad things: when something stirs a response, a response follows, through a wondrous and unfathomable process. “Spirit” refers to what cannot be measured or known; “never dies” means that it does not stop or rest. This unfathomable responsiveness of the Dao has never ceased, which is why it is said that the Valley Spirit never dies.

“Dark” means deep and hidden; “female” refers to motherhood. The Valley Spirit’s response to the myriad things is profound and difficult to describe, and all things receive nourishment from it. That is why it is called the “Mysterious Female.”

The gateway of the Mysterious Female is the root of Heaven and Earth and all things.

疏:玄牝之用,有感必深妙难名,万物由其茂养,故云是谓玄牝。 玄牝之门,是谓天地根。 疏:玄牝之用,有感必应,应由物出,故谓之门。天地,有形之大者尔,不得玄牝之用,则将分裂发泄,故资禀得一以为根本,故云是谓天地之根本也。 绵绵若存,用之不勤。 疏:绵绵者,微妙不绝之意。虚牝之用,应物无私,微妙则称为若存,无私故用不动倦。 天长地久章第七 前章明谷神虚应,虚应2不穷,此章明天地无私,无私3故长久。首则标天地以为喻,次则举圣人以转明,结以无私成私,将欲劝勤此行。 天长地久。 疏:此标章门也,天以气象,故称长。地以形质,故称久。 天地所以能长且久者,以其不自生,故能长生。 疏:前句标问,此假答云:天地所以能长且久者,以其覆载万物,长育群材,而皆资察於妙本,不自矜其,以其不自生,故能长生。 疏:前句标问,此假答云:天地所以能长且久者,以其覆载万物,长育群材,而皆资察於妙本,不自矜其生成之功用,以是之故,故能长久。又解云:不自生者,言天地但生养万物,不自饶益其生,故能长久。 是以圣人后其身而身先,外其身而身存。
Interpretation

The function of the “Mysterious Female” is profound and subtle, beyond words; when something stirs it, it is sure to respond. All things are nourished and grow through it, so it is called the “Mysterious Female”—the hidden, deep source that gives life and nourishment.

The Mysterious Female responds whenever something stirs it, and its response becomes apparent through the stirrings of all things; thus it is called the “Gate.” Heaven and Earth are the greatest of formed things. Without the Mysterious Female’s function, Heaven and Earth would separate and fall apart. Heaven and Earth take “attaining the One”—acquiring the fundamental Dao that unifies them—as their basis; hence it is said to be their root.

“Continuous” means subtle and unceasing. The function of the empty and still Mysterious Female responds to all things without partiality. It is subtle and hard to perceive, so it is said to seem to exist; it is impartial, so its function never appears weary.

Chapter Seven: Heaven Is Long, Earth Endures

The previous chapter explained that the “Spirit of the Valley”—the Dao, empty and still like a valley and able to respond to all things—acts without limit. This chapter explains that Heaven and Earth endure because they are impartial. It opens by using Heaven and Earth as an analogy, then explains the principle through the Sage, and concludes with “being selfless, one fulfills oneself,” encouraging people to put this way into practice.

Heaven is long; Earth endures.

Heaven is marked by the movement and transformation of Qi, so it is called “long”; Earth is marked by form and matter, so it is called “enduring.”

Heaven and Earth can be long and enduring because they do not live for themselves while giving life to all things; therefore, they live on.

The text first poses a question and then answers it: Heaven and Earth cover and support all things and nurture every kind of living being. They do all this by relying on the profound fundamental Dao, without boasting of their achievement in creating and nurturing all things; therefore, they endure. Another interpretation is that “not living for themselves” means Heaven and Earth give life only to all things and seek no benefit for their own lives; therefore, they endure.

Therefore, the Sage puts himself last and thereby comes to the fore among all people; he sets himself aside and thereby preserves himself.

疏:是以圣人效天地之覆载,叉均养而无私,故推先与人,百姓欣赖,为下所仰,故身先也。不自矜贵,而外薄其身,天下归仁,则无畏害,故身存也。 非以其无私邪?故能成其私。 疏:天地所以能长久,圣人所以先存者,非以其无自私之心,故能成此长久先存之私乎? 上善若水章第八 前章明天地无私生成则长久,此章明至人善行柔弱故无尤。首标若水,示三能之近道。次云居地,书七善之利物。结以不争,劝守4柔而全胜也。 上善若水。 疏:上善者,标人善行柔弱故无尤。首标若水,示三能之近道。次云居地,书七善之利物。结以不争,劝守4柔而全胜也。 上善若水。 疏:上善者,标人也。若水者,举喻也。至人虚怀,於法无住,忘善而善,是善之上。上善之行,如水之能,具在下文,皆含法喻。 水善利万物而不争,处众人之所恶。 疏:水性甘凉,散洒一切,被其润泽,蒙利则长,故云善利,此一能也。天下柔弱莫过於水,平可取法,清可鉴人,乘流遇坎,与之委顺,在人所引,尝不竞争,此二能也。恶居下流,众人恒趋,水则就卑受浊,处恶不辞,此三能也。 故几於道。
Interpretation

The highest goodness is like water.

Commentary: “Highest goodness” here means the highest good conduct a person can attain, while “like water” uses water as a metaphor. The realized person, whose cultivation has reached a high level, is calm and inwardly still, attached to nothing and making no deliberate show of doing good. By giving no thought to goodness, they do good naturally: this is the highest goodness. The conduct of the highest good is like water, as the following passages explain through both principles of cultivation and metaphor.

Water is skilled at nourishing all things, yet it does not compete with them. It dwells in low places that people dislike.

Commentary: Water is mild and cool; it spreads everywhere and moistens all things. Nourished, all things can grow. This is why water is said to benefit all things: it is its first virtue. Nothing in the world is more yielding than water. When calm, it can serve as a standard; when clear, it can reflect a person. As it flows, when it meets an obstacle, it follows the terrain and lets itself be guided, never competing with anything: this is its second virtue. Low places are often avoided by people, but water willingly settles in them and receives what is impure: this is its third virtue.

For this reason, water’s nature comes closest to the Dao (the Way).

疏:几,近也。利物明其弘益,不争表其柔弱,处恶示其含垢,此水性之三能,唯至人之一贯,其行如此,去道不遐,故云近尔。 居善地, 疏:至人所居,善能弘益。弘益,不争表其柔弱,处恶示其含垢,此水性之三能,唯至人之一贯,其行如此,去道不遐,故云近尔。 居善地, 疏:至人所居,善能弘益。如水在地,利物则多。又地道用卑,水好流下,同至人之谦顺,几道性之柔弱,故云居善地。 心善渊, 疏:至人之心,善於安静,如水之性,湛尔泉渟。水静则清明,心闲则了悟。渊,深静也,故云心善渊。 与善仁, 疏:至人弘济,常以与人。善施之功,合乎仁行,如水润物,无心爱憎,故云与善仁。 言善信, 疏:上善之人,言必真实,弘化凡庶,善信不欺。如彼济,常以与人。善施之功,合乎仁行,如水润物,无心爱憎,故云与善仁。 言善信, 疏:上善之人,言必真实,弘化凡庶,善信不欺。如彼泉流,岂殊坎险,故云言善信。注云:行险而不失其信者,《周易》坎卦辞也。 政善治, 疏:政,正也。至人於事,动合无心,正容悟物,物因从正。正则自理,非善而何?如彼水性,洗涤群物,令其清静,故云政善治。 事善能,
Interpretation

“The great Dao is close at hand” means that water nourishes all things and shows how broadly it benefits them. It does not compete with anything for superiority, displaying gentleness and yieldingness. It flows toward low places and can contain impurities. The realized person fully embodies these three qualities of water. Acting in this way, one is not far from the Dao; hence the word “close.”

Abiding in a good place: Wherever the realized person dwells, that place can bring benefit, just as water flows over the earth and nourishes all things. The earth lies low, and water, too, naturally flows toward low places. This accords with the realized person’s humility and yieldingness, expressing the Dao’s softness. Hence, “abiding in a good place.”

A good heart is deep: The realized person’s heart is at ease in stillness, like clear, quiet water. When water settles, it becomes clear; when the heart is at rest, it can understand things. “Deep” means profound and tranquil. Hence, “a good heart is deep.”

A good way of giving is benevolent: The realized person is always ready to help others, and the good they give accords with benevolence. Like water moistening all things, they show no favoritism and make no distinctions based on likes or dislikes. Hence, “a good way of giving is benevolent.”

Good words are trustworthy: The person who has attained the highest state speaks truthfully and teaches others with honesty, without deception. Like a spring that flows through perilous terrain without changing its nature, they remain true to their word. Hence, “good words are trustworthy.” The commentary’s quotation, “Passing through danger without losing one’s trustworthiness,” comes from the statement on the Kan hexagram in the Zhouyi; it means that one remains trustworthy even when passing through danger.

Good governance brings order: “Governance” means setting things right. The realized person responds to affairs in accordance with Wuwei (non-action), setting an upright example that transforms things and guides all beings back to the right path. Once things are put right, they naturally come to order. Like water washing all things clean and calm, this is why it is said, “good governance brings order.”

Good work is done skillfully:

疏:至人圆明,於物无碍,凡有运动,在事皆通。通则善能,是名照了。如彼水性,决之为川,壅之为池,浮舟涵虚,无所不为,是善能也。 动善时。 疏:至人之心,喻彼虚谷,方之镜像,物感斯应,如彼水性,春泮冬为,是善能也。 动善时。 疏:至人之心,喻彼虚谷,方之镜像,物感斯应,如彼水性,春泮冬凝,与时消息,故云动善时。 夫惟不争,故无尤。 疏:尤,过也。至人善行,与物无伤,虚心曲全,未曾争竞,波流颓靡,委顺若斯,既不违逆於物,故无尤过之地矣。 持而盈之章第九 前章明至人善行柔弱故无尤,此章明凡俗溺情骄盈故有咎。首标持盈揣锐,示其难保。次云金玉富贵,戒此贪求。结以名遂身退,令忘功而不处也。 持而盈之,不如其已。 疏:持,执也。盈,满也。已,止也。言人心贪爱,求取无厌,执守保持, 使令盈满,积财为累,悔吝必生,故圣人戒云:不如休止。 揣而锐之,不可长保。 疏:揣,量度也。锐,铦利也。凡情滞溺厌,执守保持, 使令盈满,积财为累,悔吝必生,故圣人戒云:不如休止。 揣而锐之,不可长保。 疏:揣,量度也。锐,铦利也。凡情滞溺,贪求荣利,故揣量前事,铦锐
Interpretation

A perfected person—a person whose cultivation has reached a profound level—has a mind that is open, clear, and unobstructed by anything. Whatever they undertake, they handle with ease. Once they understand a situation, they can respond appropriately. This is called “illuminating understanding”: seeing clearly how things stand. It is like the nature of water. Guide it into a channel, and it becomes a river; block it, and it becomes a pond. It can bear boats and hold within it all things, as though it were empty space. There is nothing to which it cannot adapt. This is what it means to respond skillfully.

Action should accord with the time.

The perfected person’s mind is like an open valley, and like a mirror reflecting all things: when something outside stirs it, the mind responds in turn. This is like the nature of water: it thaws in spring and freezes in winter, waxing and waning with the seasons. Thus it is said, “Action should accord with the time.”

Because they do not contend with anything, they have no faults.

“Fault” means an error or failing. The perfected person acts by skillfully adapting and does not harm things outside themselves. They are modest and yielding, willing to bend in order to preserve what matters, and never strive to outdo or defeat others. Like water flowing with the terrain and turning along its course, they adapt to all things without opposing them, and so do not fall into error.

Chapter Nine: Holding and Filling

The previous chapter described how the perfected person acts gently and yields, and so has no faults. This chapter describes how ordinary people become immersed in desire and grow arrogant and complacent, thereby bringing misfortune upon themselves. It opens with the examples of holding something full and honing a blade, showing that such states are difficult to sustain. It then uses gold, jade, wealth, and rank to warn against greed. Finally, it concludes by advising people to withdraw once their work is done and their name is established, rather than cling to their achievements or claim the credit.

Holding something full is not as good as stopping in time.

“Hold” means to keep something in one’s grasp; “full” means filled to capacity; “stop” means to cease. People’s hearts cling endlessly to desire. They are never satisfied with what they acquire and always want to hold firmly to what they already have, making it grow ever greater until it is full. But accumulating possessions in this way becomes a burden, and regret and worry are sure to follow. Therefore, the sage advises: it is better to stop in time.

If you hone something to a sharp edge, it cannot stay sharp for long.

“To hone” means to measure or grind; “sharp” means keen. Immersed in desire and coveting wealth and advantage, ordinary people repeatedly calculate and hone their edge, hoping to make themselves even sharper. But this state cannot be sustained for long.

欲心,鬼瞰人怨,坐招殃咎,故曰不可长保也。 金玉满堂,莫之能守。 疏:假使贪求不已,适令金玉满堂,象有齿而焚身,鸡畏牺而断尾,且失不贪之宝,坐贻政寇之忧,其以贾害,岂云能守?此复释持盈也。 富贵而骄,自遗其咎。 疏:遗,与也。富则人求之,故便欺物。贵则人下之,故好凌人。骄奢至而不期,殃咎来而谁与?因骄获咎,骄自心生,故云自遗尔。此复释揣锐也。 功成名遂身退,天之道。 疏:此举戒也。夫满则招损,谦便受益。惟彼天道,尚不常盈,故功成者隳,名遂者亏。欲5求长保,未闻斯语。当须忘功与名,退身辞盛道。 疏:此举戒也。夫满则招损,谦便受益。惟彼天道,尚不常盈,故功成者隳,名遂者亏。欲5求长保,未闻斯语。当须忘功与名,退身辞盛,如彼天道,不失盈虚,则无忧责矣。 载营魄章第十 前章明纵欲溺情骄盈故有咎,此章明养神爱气不杂则无疵。营魄已下至涤除,戒修身所以全德。爱人已下至明白,示德全可以为君。结以生之畜之,表玄功之被物也。 载营魄抱一,能无离乎?
Interpretation

Excessive desire attracts the scrutiny of spirits and ghosts and the resentment of other people, leaving one to wait for disaster to strike. It cannot be sustained for long.

Even when a house is filled with gold and jade, no one can hold on to them forever.

Explanation: If greed has no limit, then even a house full of gold and jade may bring ruin—as when an elephant is killed for its valuable tusks, or a rooster is chosen as a sacrificial offering and has its tail feathers cut off. In this way, one loses the precious virtue of being free from greed and invites political calamity. Greed brings harm instead; how could anyone hold on to wealth? This further explains the principle of “holding fullness”—remaining full without becoming arrogant or indulgent.

To grow arrogant and conceited after becoming wealthy and powerful is to bring calamity upon oneself.

Explanation: “Bestow” means “give.” People often come to the wealthy seeking something, making it easy for them to oppress others. People often defer to those in high positions, making it easy for them to place themselves above others. Arrogance and extravagance often take shape without one noticing; when calamity arrives, who can bear it in one’s place? Since arrogance brings calamity, and arrogance arises within oneself, one is said to bring calamity upon oneself. This further explains the principle of “sharpening the edge”—showing off one’s prowess and striving to prevail.

After one’s achievements are complete and one’s reputation has flourished, one should withdraw and retire. This is the law of Heaven.

Explanation: This serves as a warning. Fullness invites loss, while humility brings gain. Even Heaven does not remain forever in a state of fullness. Thus, when achievements reach their peak, they decline; after a reputation has flourished, it too diminishes. To seek lasting preservation without understanding this principle is futile. One should forget achievement and reputation, and withdraw and yield when one is prospering. By following the changes of fullness and emptiness as Heaven does, one avoids bringing upon oneself distress and blame.

Chapter Ten: Carrying the Soul

The previous chapter explained that indulging desire and emotion, and becoming arrogant and self-satisfied, invite calamity. This chapter explains that by nurturing the spirit, cherishing Jing and Qi, and keeping the mind and spirit from scattering, one can avoid error. From “carrying the soul” through “cleansing and purifying,” it advises people how to cultivate themselves and preserve De. From “loving the people” through “clarity,” it explains how those with complete De can govern the world. It concludes with “giving life and nurturing,” showing that the Dao’s mysterious power can nourish all things.

In carrying and settling body and mind, and bringing the ethereal and corporeal souls together in an embrace of the One—the Dao, or a state of pure unity—is it possible to keep them from separating?

疏:载,初也。营,护也。言人受生始化,但有虚象,魄然既生,则阳气充满虚魄。魄能运动,则谓之魂,如月之魄照日,则光生矣。故春秋子产曰:人生始化曰魄。既生魄,阳为魂,言人初载虚魄,当营护阳气,常使充满,则谓之魂,如月之魄照日,则光生矣。故春秋子产曰:人生始化曰魄。既生魄,阳为魂,言人初载虚魄,当营护阳气,常使充满,则得生全。若动用不恒,消散阳气,则复成虚魄而死灭也。《庄子》曰:近死之心,莫使复阳。故令营护虚魄,使复阳全生,抱守淳一,不令染杂,无离身乎,则生全矣。此教养神也。 专气致柔,能如婴儿乎? 疏:专,专一也。气,冲和妙气也。人之受生,冲气为本,若染杂尘境,则冲气离散,神不固身,故戒令专一冲和,使致柔弱,能如婴儿,无所耽着乎。此教养气。 涤除玄览,能无疵乎? 疏:涤,洗也。除,理也。玄览,心照也。疵,病也。人之耽染,为起欲心,当须洗涤除理,使心照清净,爱欲不起,能令无疵病乎。此教涤心也。 爱民治国,能无为乎?
Interpretation

“Bearer” means what has just come into being, and “nourish” means to protect and sustain. When a person is first born, there is initially only an empty, insubstantial body. Once the body has formed, Yang Qi fills it. When the body can move, this is called the hun. It is like the moon’s Yin soul reflecting the sun, thereby revealing its light. Thus Zichan says in the Spring and Autumn Annals, “When a person is first born, it is called the po.” Once the po is born, Yang Qi becomes the hun.

The meaning is this: when a person is first born, the body is still very weak. One should nourish Yang Qi and keep it abundant, so that the hun can take shape and life can be preserved. If activity is unrestrained and Yang Qi is depleted, the body becomes empty again, and death eventually follows. The Zhuangzi says, “When the heart is close to death, do not let it recover its Yang Qi.” So one should nourish the body and keep Yang Qi abundant, restoring life to wholeness. Hold fast to unity, keep the mind and spirit free of distracting thoughts, and do not let them leave the body: then life can be preserved. This passage concerns nourishing Shen (spirit).

By concentrating on and holding fast to Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy), and bringing the body to a state of gentleness, can one become like an infant?

“Concentrate” means to focus single-mindedly, and “Qi” here refers to calm, subtle energy. Human life is rooted in balanced, harmonious Qi. When we become tainted by worldly influences, this Qi disperses, and the spirit can no longer remain settled in the body. Therefore, one should concentrate on and hold fast to balanced, harmonious Qi, making body and mind gentle, like an infant without attachments. This passage concerns nourishing Qi.

Can you cleanse and bring order to the deep inner vision, so that it is entirely without flaw?

“Cleanse” means to wash away; “bring order” means to set right; “dark vision” refers to inward awareness; and “flaw” means a fault. When people become absorbed in external things, desires arise. One should cleanse and set the mind in order, making it clear and pure so that craving and desire no longer arise, and no faults remain. This passage concerns purifying the mind.

In caring for the people and governing the state, can one practice Wuwei (non-action)?

疏:爱民者,人之耽染,为起欲心,当须洗涤除理,使心照清净,爱欲不起,能令无疵病乎。此教涤心也。 爱民治国,能无为乎? 疏:爱民者,使之不暴卒,役之不伤性。理国者务农而重谷,事简而不烦,则人安其生,不言而化也。此无为也,能为之乎? 天门开阖,能为雌乎? 疏:修德可以为君,为君须承历数,即天门者,帝王历数所从出也。开谓受命,阖为废黜,天降宝命,以祚有道,能守雌柔,可享元吉。故云能为雌乎?又解云:《易》曰:一阖一辟谓之变,言圣人设教,应变无常,不以雄盛,而守雌牝,亦如天门开阖,亏盈而益谦也。 明白四达,能无知乎? 疏:帝王既受历数,临御万方,若能守雌静,则其德明白,如日之照四达天下,功被於物不以为功,所谓忘功若无知者,故云能无知乎? 生之畜之。 疏:下经云道生之,德畜之,此云生之畜之者,谓人君德明白,如日之照四达天下,功被於物不以为功,所谓忘功若无知者,故云能无知乎? 生之畜之。 疏:下经云道生之,德畜之,此云生之畜之者,谓人君法道清静,令物得遂其生成,效德弘济,令物各尽其畜养,故云生之畜之。 生而不有,为而不恃,长而不宰,是谓玄德。
Interpretation

Care for the people by ensuring that they are not subjected to harsh or urgent demands. When conscripting them for labor, do not damage their nature. In governing the state, devote yourself to agriculture and give priority to food, keeping administration simple and free of needless disturbance. Then the people can live in peace and pursue their livelihoods, and instruction will take effect naturally, without much being said. This is Wuwei (non-action). Can you do this?

In governing the opening and closing of Heaven’s Gate, can you remain receptive and yielding?

Commentary: By cultivating De, one may become a ruler. To become a ruler, one must receive the imperial mandate and the dynastic succession bestowed by Heaven. Here, “Heaven’s Gate” refers to the source of the imperial mandate. When Heaven’s Gate “opens,” a ruler receives the mandate and ascends the throne; when it “closes,” the ruler loses the throne and is deposed. Heaven bestows its precious mandate so that a person of the Dao may receive it. If a ruler can remain receptive and yielding, he can enjoy great good fortune. Hence the question: “Can you remain receptive and yielding?” Another interpretation draws on the Book of Changes, which says, “One closing and one opening are called change.” This means that change consists in opening and closing. The sage establishes teachings in response to changing times, without fixed methods. He does not strive to overpower others, but remains yielding and humble. This is like Heaven’s Gate opening and closing, and like fullness diminishing while humility brings increase.

Can you perceive clearly and understand all directions without assuming that you know?

Commentary: Once an emperor has received Heaven’s mandate and rules the realm, if he can remain yielding and still, his De will shine brightly in all directions, like the sun. His achievements benefit all things, yet he does not claim them as his own. He lets go of his accomplishments, as though unaware of them; hence the question: “Can you perceive clearly and understand all directions without assuming that you know?”

Give life to all things and nurture them.

Commentary: Later the text says, “The Dao gives them life; De nurtures them.” Here, “give them life and nurture them” means that the ruler models himself on the Dao’s stillness, allowing all things to grow freely, and on De’s generous care, enabling each thing to be fully nurtured. Hence the words, “Give life to all things and nurture them.”

Give life to all things and nurture them.

Commentary: Later the text says, “The Dao gives them life; De nurtures them.” Here, “give them life and nurture them” means that the ruler models himself on the Dao’s stillness, allowing all things to grow freely, and on De’s generous care, enabling each thing to be fully nurtured. Hence the words, “Give life to all things and nurture them.”

Give life to all things without claiming them as your own; act without relying on your achievements; help all things grow without ruling over them. This is called Mysterious De (profound and subtle Virtue).

疏:物得遂生,圣忘功用。遂生则生理自足,忘功则功用常全。斯乃无私而成私,不宰而为真宰也。故生而不有者,令物各遂其生,君不以为己有也。为而不恃者,令物各得其动用,而不自负恃为己功也。长而不宰者,居万民之上,故云长,而不恃其功,故云不宰也。如是是谓深玄妙之德矣。 唐玄宗御制道德真经疏卷之一竟 1『礼记』二字据敦煌卷子P.3592补。 2『虚应』二字原无,据敦煌卷子P.3592补。 3『无私』二字原无,据敦煌卷子P.3592补。 4守:原作『中』,据敦煌卷子P.3592改。 5欲: 3『无私』二字原无,据敦煌卷子P.3592补。 4守:原作『中』,据敦煌卷子P.3592改。 5欲:原作『钦』,据敦煌卷子P.3592改。 3-唐玄宗御制道德真经疏卷之二 唐玄宗御制道德真经疏卷之二 三十辐章第十一 前章明养神爱气不杂则无疵,此章明利有用无相资而功立,故乾坤为太易之蕴,辕厢成用无之质,标车器以为喻,存利用以结成。 三十辐共一毂,当其无,有车之用。
Interpretation

All things grow and flourish in accordance with their own nature, yet the sage does not claim credit for it. As they grow and flourish, the principles of life naturally reach completion. The sage forgets his credit, and so his influence can be preserved for a long time. This is to harbor no self-interest, yet bring about the growth of all things in their own way; to avoid personally directing them, yet become their true ruler.

“Giving life without possessing” means allowing all things to grow and flourish in their own way, while the ruler does not treat them as his property. “Acting without relying on one’s achievements” means allowing all things to fulfill their functions, while not using these accomplishments as grounds for self-praise. “Leading without controlling” means that one is called a leader because one stands above the people; one is called “not controlling” because one does not rely on one’s achievements or claim the role of master. This is the profound and wondrous De.

End of Book One of the Commentary on the Dao De Jing, Imperial Composition of Emperor Xuanzong of the Tang.

Chapter Eleven: The Thirtieth Spoke

The previous chapter discussed cultivating the spirit and cherishing vital energy, so that the mind remains undivided and free from error. This chapter explains how things, though they have physical form, function through the empty spaces within them, which work together. Thus, Heaven and Earth contain the source embodied in the Great Change (the fundamental state from which all things arise and transform), while the axle and carriage body illustrate the principle that function is achieved through “nonbeing.” Using a carriage as its example, the chapter explains the usefulness of objects and ultimately returns to the idea of “making use.”

Thirty spokes converge at a single hub—the part at the center of the wheel that joins the spokes. It is precisely because the hub is hollow that the carriage can be put to use.

疏:辐三十贯於一毂,明少者多之所宗也。当其空无,方有车之运用。明无者有之所利也。夫道者何?至无至一者也。故能鼓动众类,磅礡群材,适使万殊区分,成之者一象;众窍互作,鼓之者一响。则原天下之动用,本天下之生成,未始离於至一者也。且就车而轮,则辕厢有也,车中空无也,车中空无,乃可运用。若无辕厢之有,则空无之运响。则原天下之动用,本天下之生成,未始离於至一者也。且就车而轮,则辕厢有也,车中空无也,车中空无,乃可运用。若无辕厢之有,则空无之运用息矣。车中若不空无,则辕厢之类,皆为弃物。故乾坤成列,而易功着焉,万化流动,而道用彰。是以借粗有之用无,明至无之利有尔。 埏埴以为器,当其无,有器之用。 疏:埏,和也。埴,粘土也。注云陶匠者,《尚书》云:范土曰陶。匠范和粘土,烧成瓦器,亦取其中空虚,以用成受物也。 凿户牖以为室,当其无,有室之用者,《尚书》云:范土曰陶。匠范和粘土,烧成瓦器,亦取其中空虚,以用成受物也。 凿户牖以为室,当其无,有室之用。
Interpretation

A wheel has thirty spokes joined to the hub at its center. This shows that the many spokes depend on the hub as their center. The hub is hollow in the middle, allowing the wheel to turn; this shows that the “nothing” in things enables the “something” to serve its purpose.

What is the Dao? It is the fundamental source that is utterly empty and one. It sets all things in motion and gathers together all kinds of matter, allowing things of countless varieties to take their distinct forms, while the source from which they arise returns to the One. Many openings each produce their own sounds, yet they are set ringing by the same breath of Qi. Thus the movement and generation of all things under Heaven never depart from the Dao, which is utterly one.

Consider a cart: its shafts and body are solid, while the inside of the body is empty. It is precisely because the body is hollow that the cart can carry things and move. Without solid parts such as the shafts and body, the empty space could serve no purpose. Conversely, if the body were not hollow, its parts, including the shafts and body, would be useless.

Heaven and Earth each establish their own order, and through this the function of the Yi becomes apparent; all things transform and flow, and through this the function of the Dao is made clear. Here, then, the roles of “something” and “nothing” in concrete things are used to explain how the utterly empty Dao enables solid things to serve their purpose.

“Clay is kneaded and shaped into a vessel, with an empty space left inside; only then is the vessel useful.”

The commentary explains: “‘Kneaded’ means worked together; ‘clay’ means sticky earth.” The commentator says this passage describes a potter making vessels. The Book of Documents says, “Molding earth is called pottery,” meaning that earth is made into objects. The potter kneads and shapes the clay, then fires it to make a vessel. The vessel can hold things precisely because an empty space is left inside.

“Doors and windows are cut out to build a house, with empty space left within; only then is the house useful.”

疏:凿,穿也。门傍窗谓之牖。古者穴居,故《诗》云:陶复陶穴,谓穿凿穴中之土以覆其上,故云凿尔。后代圣人易之以宫室,取其室中空虚,所以人得居处。庄子曰:室无空虚,则妇姑勃蹊,谓争路也。《尔雅》云:宫谓之室。 故有之以为利,无之以为用。 疏:有之所利,利於用。用必资无,故有以无为利也。无之所用,用於体,体必资有,故无以有为利。注云形而上者曰道,形而下者曰器,《易》系辞文也。自无则称道,涉有则称器,欲明道用,必约形器,故首唯借喻於三翻,终欲用无於一致尔。 五色章第十二 前章明利有用无相资故功立,此章明,欲明道用,必约形器,故首唯借喻於三翻,终欲用无於一致尔。 五色章第十二 前章明利有用无相资故功立,此章明染尘逐境驰骋则发狂。首标色声,戒伤当所以为病。次云畋猎,明逐欲所以焚和。结以圣人去取,示全真保性之要尔。 五色令人目盲,五音令人耳聋,五味令人口爽。 疏:色谓青黄赤白黑,音谓宫商角征羽,味谓酸咸甘苦辛。爽,差也。目视色,耳听声,口察味,伤当过分,则不能无损。故坐令形骸聋盲,爽差失味尔。又况耽滞世间声色诸法,不悟声色性空,岂惟形骸之有聋盲,此亦智之聋盲者尔。
Interpretation

“Cutting” means boring through; the window beside a door is called a you (window). In ancient times, people lived in caves, which is why the Book of Songs says, “They made caves in the earth and covered them over.” This means digging out a hollow in the ground, then covering it with earth. Later, the sages built palaces and houses for people to live in, leaving empty space inside so that people could dwell there. The Zhuangzi says that when a house has no open space, a mother-in-law and daughter-in-law may quarrel as they struggle to pass one another. The Erya says that “palace” means “room.”

Thus, tangible things provide convenience, but it is the intangible, empty space that actually makes them useful.

The convenience provided by “being” lies in its availability for use. But for it to serve a purpose, it must rely on “nonbeing” (empty space), so “being” takes “nonbeing” as its convenience. The function of “nonbeing” operates through concrete things; yet for concrete things to exist, they must rely on “being,” so “nonbeing,” too, takes “being” as its convenience. The commentary cites the Book of Changes, “The above-form is called the Dao; the below-form is called a vessel.” From the intangible aspect, it is called the Dao; when it concerns the tangible aspect, it is called a vessel (a concrete thing). To explain how the Dao works, one must use tangible things as examples. Thus, the chapter begins with three metaphors and concludes by showing that, at the root, it is “nonbeing” that is put to use.

Chapter Twelve: The Five Colors

The previous chapter explained that “being” and “nonbeing” depend on each other in order to serve a purpose. This chapter explains that becoming absorbed in worldly life and chasing external things can throw the mind and spirit into turmoil. It begins by listing colors and sounds, warning that excessive stimulation causes harm; it then discusses hunting to show that pursuing desires damages inner calm. It concludes with the sage’s choices, pointing to the essentials of preserving one’s true nature and nurturing one’s innate character.

The five colors—blue-green, yellow, red, white, and black—blind the eyes; the five notes—gong, shang, jue, zhi, and yu—deafen the ears; and the five flavors—sour, salty, sweet, bitter, and pungent—dull the palate.

Here, “colors” refers to the five colors of blue-green, yellow, red, white, and black; “notes” refers to the five musical tones of gong, shang, jue, zhi, and yu; and “flavors” refers to the five tastes of sour, salty, sweet, bitter, and pungent. “Dull” means to become impaired or distorted. When the eyes see colors, the ears hear sounds, and the mouth distinguishes flavors, excessive stimulation inevitably causes harm. It can make the body as though it were blind or deaf, or unable to distinguish tastes. More broadly, if people become absorbed in worldly sights, sounds, and other things, without understanding that sights and sounds are empty in their nature, the damage affects not only the bodily senses but also their wisdom.

驰骋畋猎,令人心发狂。 疏:此言耽声滞色之人,驰骋欲心,亦如畋猎,但求杀获,欲心奔盛,逐境如驰,静而观之,是心发狂病也。 难得之货,令人行妨。 疏:难得之货者,言人身以村器为货,难畋猎,但求杀获,欲心奔盛,逐境如驰,静而观之,是心发狂病也。 难得之货,令人行妨。 疏:难得之货者,言人身以村器为货,难得之货者,则性分所无,求不可得。云不安本分,矫性妄求,既其乖失天然,所以妨伤道行。 是以圣人为腹不为目。 疏:腹者,含受而无分别。目者,妄视滞於色尘。无分别则全和,故为之。滞色尘则伤性,故不为也。 故去彼取此。 疏:彼目妄视,故去之。此腹含受,故取之。 宠辱章第十三 前章明染逐尘境驰骋则发狂,此章明宠辱若惊贵身故为患,首两句标宗以起问受,故取之。 宠辱章第十三 前章明染逐尘境驰骋则发狂,此章明宠辱若惊贵身故为患,首两句标宗以起问,次十句因问以明理,后四句贵爱不矜,假寄托以结成。 宠辱若惊, 疏:若,如也。言宠辱之惊相如也。夫操之则宠,舍之则辱,言人不能心齐荣辱,矜徇功名,执权既以为光宠,失势自伤於卑辱。光宠则矜恃,卑辱则惊嗟,故陈戒使其若惊,欲令齐其宠辱。
Interpretation

Those who chase sensual pleasures, indulging their desires and rushing about in every direction, are like people who go hunting, seeking only to kill their quarry. As their desires grow stronger, their minds and spirits race after the things around them. Quietly observed, this state is like a mind gone mad.

“Rare and precious goods” are valuable things that people strive to obtain. If something lies beyond one’s proper place yet one still pursues it by force, this is to go against one’s nature and grasp at what is not rightfully one’s own. It therefore obstructs the cultivation of the Dao.

The sage, then, seeks what is in the “belly,” not what is in the “eye.” The “belly” refers to inward receptivity, without making distinctions; the “eye” refers to recklessly chasing external things and craving sensory pleasures. Making fewer distinctions preserves one’s nature and inner character, while becoming infatuated with external things harms one’s nature.

Thus, one should set aside the “eye” that vainly chases sights and instead take up the “belly,” which receives without making reckless distinctions.

Chapter Thirteen: Favor and Disgrace

The previous chapter explained that becoming absorbed in external circumstances and rushing after pleasures can throw the mind and spirit into disorder. This chapter explains that taking favor and disgrace too seriously, and placing excessive importance on oneself, bring worry and trouble. The opening lines state the central idea and introduce what follows; a question and answer then clarify the principle; the chapter concludes by urging us to cherish ourselves without becoming self-important.

Favor and disgrace are like alarm

“Like” means “resembling”: the alarm caused by favor and the alarm caused by disgrace are alike. One receives favor because someone grants it; when favor is lost, one feels disgraced. If people cannot regard honor and disgrace with equanimity, they will chase fame and status. When they hold power and influence, they treat these as glory and boast of them; when they lose their position, they feel lowly and disgraced, and become anxious and distressed. The passage therefore cautions people to remain alert to both favor and disgrace, and through this to learn to regard them equally.

贵大患若身。 疏:贵,矜贵也。若亦如也。身者祸患之源,夫耽玩声色,矜竞荣华,皆为有身,遂成患本。即贵其身者,复何异乎贵大患矣?即身本是患,等无有异,未能无患,柢贵也。若亦如也。身者祸患之源,夫耽玩声色,矜竞荣华,皆为有身,遂成患本。即贵其身者,复何异乎贵大患矣?即身本是患,等无有异,未能无患,柢为有身。即此贵身同贵大患,若能无患,亦复亡身,是知患由贵生,身由患有,故云贵大患若身。 何谓宠辱?宠为下。 疏:前标宠辱若惊,恐人不晓,故设问云:何谓宠辱?还自答云:宠为下。所以明宠为下者,夫恃宠则骄盈,骄盈则生祸,因宠获祸,则宠为辱本,故知宠为下。 得之若惊,失之若惊,是谓宠辱若惊。 疏:得则为宠,失则为辱,若惊者,故宠辱循环,故宠为辱本。世间众生,得宠则欣喜,得辱则惊惧,故圣人戒之,祸福循环,譬之纠缠,宠辱无定,岂可独惊?辱来既惊其祸患,宠至亦惊其骄逸,其惊相若,故云是辱本。世间众生,得宠则欣喜,得辱则惊惧,故圣人戒之,祸福循环,譬之纠缠,宠辱无定,岂可独惊?辱来既惊其祸患,宠至亦惊其骄逸,其惊相若,故云是谓宠辱若惊。 何谓贵大患若身? 疏:恐人不晓,设问以明。
Interpretation

Regard yourself as something precious, as you would regard a calamity.

“Precious” means to value something highly, and “as” means “like.” The body is the source of calamity. Becoming absorbed in sights and sounds, and striving after wealth and glory, both stem from attachment to oneself and thus become the starting point of calamity. If you value yourself, how is that different from valuing a great calamity? The self is already bound up with calamity. The reason one cannot escape calamity lies in clinging to the existence of this body. If you can stop clinging to yourself, you will no longer regard calamity as precious. We can see from this that calamity arises from valuing oneself, and that the body is bound up with calamity. Hence the saying, “Regard calamity as you would regard yourself.”

What does it mean to receive favor or suffer disgrace? Receiving favor itself places one in a subordinate position.

The preceding passage says, “Favor and disgrace alike bring alarm.” To ensure this is understood, it poses a question and explains. Receiving favor places one in a subordinate position because relying on favor easily leads to arrogance and complacency, which in turn invite calamity. When favor brings calamity, it becomes clear that affection is the very root of disgrace.

To feel alarm when receiving favor and to feel alarm when losing it—this is what it means for both favor and disgrace to bring alarm.

Receiving affection is “favor”; losing it is “disgrace.” Favor and disgrace can turn into one another, and favor itself may become the root of disgrace. When ordinary people receive favor, they rejoice; when they suffer disgrace, they are alarmed. The sage reminds people that fortune and calamity transform into one another and arrive intertwined, and that favor and disgrace are not fixed. One should not feel alarm only when disgraced. When disgrace comes, people worry about calamity; when favor comes, they should also guard against becoming arrogant. Both situations call for caution. Hence favor and disgrace alike bring alarm.

What does it mean to “regard calamity as you would regard yourself”?

Here, to make the meaning of the saying clear, a question is posed and then answered.

吾所以有大患者,为吾有身。 疏:吾所以有大患者,为吾执有身相,好荣恶辱,辫是与非,不得则大忧以惧,心神内竭於贪欲,形骸外因於奔竞,葡然疲役,非患而何? 及吾无身,吾有何患? 疏:无身者,谓能体了身相虚幻,本非真实,即当坐忘遗照,隳体黜聪,同大通之无主,均委和之非我,自然荣辱之途泯,爱恶之心息,所谓帝之悬解,复何计於大患乎?故云及吾无身,吾有何患?注云委和者,庄子丞答舜云:身非汝有,是天地之委和。 故贵以身为天下者,若可寄天下。爱以身为天无身,吾有何患?注云委和者,庄子丞答舜云:身非汝有,是天地之委和。 故贵以身为天下者,若可寄天下。爱以身为天下者,若可托天下。 疏:言人君有自矜贵其身以为天下之主者,贵身则凌人,人故不附,可暂寄尔。若自爱其身以为天下之主者,爱身则慈人,人则乐推,故可托身於万人之上,长为之主。然此章首标惊宠辱,终以寄托者,欲明惊宠辱不若忘宠辱,有贵爱不若忘贵爱,托天下不若忘天下,故又云有大患为吾有身,惊宠辱未能物我都忘,则百虑一致,矜有则万殊争长,故忘宠辱则无所复惊,忘身则无为患本,忘天下则无寄托之迹,然后上有太上之君,下有下知之臣,无为无不为,不德而有德矣。
Interpretation

I have great troubles because I am attached to my body.

“I have great troubles because I am attached to my bodily form. I place great importance on honor and loathe disgrace, and am always distinguishing right from wrong. When things do not go as I wish, I become anxious and afraid. Greed wears down the heart, while rushing about in competition exhausts the body. How could such weariness and suffering not be troubles?”

When I no longer cling to my body, what troubles could remain?

To “not cling to the body” means to see that bodily form is illusory and insubstantial. Through “sitting in forgetfulness”—sitting quietly and forgetting one’s form and preconceived views—one lets go of attending to external things, casts aside bodily sensations and the sharpness of the ears and eyes, and becomes connected with the Great Dao. One no longer takes oneself to be the master, but understands that, like all the myriad things brought forth by Heaven and Earth, the body does not truly belong to oneself. Then distinctions between honor and disgrace disappear, and feelings of love and aversion subside. Zhuangzi calls this “undoing the hanging bonds”: releasing the spirit from its restraints. Why, then, worry about great troubles? Hence the saying: “When I no longer cling to my body, what troubles could remain?”

“Wei-He” refers to the body as a temporary gathering of the Qi of Heaven and Earth, shaped by Yin and Yang, and not something one personally owns. Zhuangzi records that Cheng answered Shun, saying: “The body does not belong to you; it is entrusted to you by Heaven and Earth and formed through their transformations.”

Therefore, one who values the realm more highly than their own body can be entrusted with the realm; one who cares for the realm as they care for their own body can also be entrusted with it.

This passage says that if a ruler regards himself as exalted and takes himself to be the master of the realm, he is likely to look down on others, and so people will not sincerely support him. The realm can only be entrusted to him for a time. But if a ruler cares for the realm as he cares for himself, he will treat the people with benevolence, and they will gladly support him. The realm can therefore be entrusted to him for long-term governance.

The chapter begins by discussing fear arising from favor and disgrace, and ends with entrusting the realm. Its point is that rather than be alarmed by favor and disgrace, one should forget them; rather than cling to exalted status and cherished possessions, one should let go of these attachments; rather than leave a reputation for having been entrusted with the realm, one should not keep the realm in mind at all. Clinging to favor and disgrace makes it impossible to forget the distinction between self and things, leaving the mind tangled in worries. Relying on one’s exalted status leads to competing with others. Forget favor and disgrace, and there is no longer alarm; forget the self, and the source of distress is removed; forget the realm, and no trace of attachment to its entrusted governance remains. Then, with a supreme ruler above who practices Wuwei (non-action), and ministers below who follow the Great Dao, all things can be accomplished through non-action, and De (Virtue/Power) arises naturally without being claimed.

视之不见章第十四 前章明贵身为患,令兼忘而不有,此章明妙本无象,故在用而皆通。首三句言不可求之声色,次六句明寻责必归於无物,德而有德矣。 视之不见章第十四 前章明贵身为患,令兼忘而不有,此章明妙本无象,故在用而皆通。首三句言不可求之声色,次六句明寻责必归於无物,又五句示妙用之难测,后四句结引古以证今。 视之不见名曰夷,听之不闻名曰希,传之不得名曰微。 疏:此明道也。夫视之者,以色求道,听之者,以声求道,搏之者,以形求道。道非色声形法,故求竟不得,以不得故,欲谓之无,乃於无色之中,能应众色,无声之中,能和众声,无形之中,能状众形,是无色之色,无声之声,无形之形,故谓之希微夷。希微夷者故,欲谓之无,乃於无色之中,能应众色,无声之中,能和众声,无形之中,能状众形,是无色之色,无声之声,无形之形,故谓之希微夷。希微夷者,谓明道而非道也。夷,平易也。希者,声之微妙也。传,执持也。 此三者不可致诘,故混而为一。 疏:三者,夷也、希也、微也。致,得也。诘,责也。混,同也。妙本微妙精一,难名色声形法,焉得诘责?欲以色声形诘,但得希微尔。谓三也,三者假名,欲明道用,道非色声形等,则混为一矣。
Interpretation

What the eyes look at but cannot see is called “Yi” (indistinct); what the ears listen for but cannot hear is called “Xi” (inaudible); what the hands reach out to touch but cannot grasp is called “Wei” (imperceptible).

The commentary explains: This passage speaks of the Dao. Looking with the eyes means trying to find the Dao among forms and colors; listening with the ears means trying to find it in sounds; reaching out with the hands means trying to find it in physical forms. But the Dao does not belong to forms and colors, sounds, or physical forms, so no matter how one searches, it cannot be found. Yet it would also be wrong to conclude that it is “nothing.” Though the Dao has no forms or colors, it can accord with every form and color; though it makes no sound, it can harmonize with every sound; though it has no physical form, it can appear in every form. This is how color appears within the colorless, sound answers within the soundless, and form emerges within the formless. The scripture uses “Xi, Wei, and Yi” to name this elusive Dao. Here, “Yi” means level and even, without bias; “Xi” refers to a sound too subtle to hear. “Chuan” means to hold or grasp. “To illuminate the Dao is not the Dao” means that these names describe the Dao’s workings but cannot be equated with the Dao itself.

These three cannot be pursued to their source, and so they blend into one.

The commentary explains: “These three” refers to Yi, Xi, and Wei. “Zhi” means to reach; “jie” means to question and investigate; “hun” means to combine as one. The Dao’s essential nature is subtle and unified, and cannot readily be named in terms of forms and colors, sounds, or physical forms. Naturally, it cannot be investigated through them. If one tries to pursue it through forms and colors, sounds, or physical forms, one can reach only the terms “Xi, Wei, and Yi.” These names were devised only to describe the Dao’s workings. Since the Dao belongs to none of these categories, ultimately it blends into oneness.

其上不皦,其下不昧。 疏:皦,明也。昧,暗也。夫形质之物,皆用,道非色声形等,则混为一矣。 其上不皦,其下不昧。 疏:皦,明也。昧,暗也。夫形质之物,皆有定方,在上者则明,在下者则暗,唯妙本惚恍不可定名,则在上亦不明,在下亦不昧,而能上能下,能明能暗,非天下之至赜,其孰能与於此乎? 绳绳不可名,复归於无物。 疏:绳绳者,运动不绝之意也。妙本生化,运动无穷,生物之功,强名不得,物物而不物,生生而不生,寻责则妙本湛然,未曾有物,故云复归於无物也。 是谓无状之状,无物之象,是谓惚恍。 疏:状,形状也。象,物象也。言妙本混成,本无形质,而万化资禀,品物流形,斯可谓有无状之形状,有无疏:状,形状也。象,物象也。言妙本混成,本无形质,而万化资禀,品物流形,斯可谓有无状之形状,有无物之物象,不可名之为有,亦不可格之於无,无有难名,故谓之惚恍。 迎之不见其首,随之不见其后。 疏:至精无形,至大不可围,故迎之者不见其首,随之者不见其后。无首则无始,无后即无终,无始无终,故非随迎所得也。 执古之道,以御今之有。
Interpretation

Above it, there is no particular brightness; below it, no particular darkness.

“Jiao” means bright, and “mei” means dark. Everything that has form and substance occupies a definite place and has a definite shape: what is above appears bright, while what is below appears dark. Only the subtle source—the root of the Dao—is elusive and hard to grasp, beyond definition by any fixed name. Above, it is not especially bright; below, it is not especially dark. It can be above or below, manifest or hidden. What could be like this, if not the most profound and subtle presence in the world?

It extends without end and cannot be named; in the end, it returns to nothing.

“Shengsheng” describes continuous, unceasing change. The subtle source gives rise to the myriad things, changing without limit, yet its power to create them cannot be accurately expressed in words. It gives rise to the myriad things without appearing as any particular thing. The things continually come into being, while it is not itself something that has come into being. At the deepest level, the subtle source is still and clear, and has never had a concrete form. That is why it is said to return, in the end, to “nothing.”

This is called the form of the formless and the image of the imageless. This is called “elusive and indistinct.”

“Zhuang” means form, and “xiang” means image. The subtle source is an undivided whole. It has no form of its own, yet it is what the transformations of the myriad things depend on, and the root from which each takes its particular shape. Thus it can be called the form of the formless and the image of the imageless. It cannot be described as some concrete thing, nor can it be declared to be sheer nothingness. Since being and nonbeing alike defy clear expression, it is called “elusive and indistinct.”

Facing it, one cannot see its beginning; following it, one cannot see its end.

The Dao is supremely subtle and formless, vast beyond all bounds. So, facing it, one cannot see its beginning; following it, one cannot see its end. Without a beginning, there is no origin to speak of; without an end, there is no conclusion to speak of. It has neither beginning nor end and cannot be grasped by facing it or following it.

Hold fast to the Dao of ancient times and use it to guide the myriad things that exist in the present.

疏:此明古先帝王常以无为道化,以化於人,故戒今能执守古之所行无为之教,以御理今之有为之事,则不言而化矣。 能知古始,是谓道纪。 疏:前云执古之道,将引之使行。此云能知古始,明道行必化。故重云帝王能知古始,无为而理,当之事,则不言而化矣。 能知古始,是谓道纪。 疏:前云执古之道,将引之使行。此云能知古始,明道行必化。故重云帝王能知古始,无为而理,当抱守淳朴,爰清爰静者,是知无为之理,是道之纲纪也。 古之善为士章第十五 前章明妙本无象,则在用而皆通,此章明玄通之人,常不盈而能弊。首标古之五句,明善为所以微妙。次云豫若七句,示德容所以难明。孰能下两句,表进修之徐生。保此下终篇,结证成而不滞。 古之善为士者,微妙玄通,深不可识。 疏:古,昔也。士,事也,言古昔之人善以道事者,精微要妙,玄寂通达,体道了言,涣然无滞,而其宇量深邃,不可识知。 夫惟不可识,故强为之容: 疏:夫惟善士,虽正容可以悟物,而宇泰发於天光,德量难窥,故强为容状,且求委顺之迹,将以引化凡愚。 豫兮若冬涉川, 疏:强为之容:
Interpretation

This passage explains that ancient emperors often used the Dao of Wuwei (non-action) to guide the people. It therefore counsels today’s rulers to uphold the teaching of Wuwei practiced by the ancients and use it to address the affairs of government that now require action. In this way, people can be naturally transformed without relying on words.

“To know the ancient beginning is to grasp the guiding principles of the Dao.” To understand the source of things is to grasp the fundamental principles of the Dao. The previous passage spoke of holding to the ancient Dao in order to guide people to live in accordance with it. This passage goes further, explaining that understanding the source of the Dao enables its practice to transform people. If an emperor understands the ancient beginning, governs through Wuwei, preserves simplicity, and maintains stillness, he understands the principle of Wuwei and has grasped the guiding principles of the Dao.

Chapter Fifteen: Those of Old Who Were Skilled in the Dao

The previous chapter explained that the subtle source of the Dao has no shape or form, and so its workings reach everywhere. This chapter explains that those who are profoundly attuned to the Dao can remain free of complacency, yet are difficult for others to fathom. The first five lines describe the subtle profundity of those skilled in practicing the Dao. The next seven lines portray the qualities and bearing that make them hard to understand. The two lines beginning “Who can…” say that cultivation must proceed step by step. The chapter concludes by emphasizing the need to hold to this Dao, showing that even after cultivation is complete, one does not become fixed in any one place.

Those of old who were skilled in practicing the Dao were subtle and profound, open and far-reaching; they were so deep that others could not fathom them.

Here, “old” means the past, while “adept” refers to a person who practices the Dao. Those of old who were skilled in acting in accordance with the Dao were subtle and profound, quiet and far-reaching, yet open and perceptive. They experienced the Great Dao and understood its principles; their minds were open and unobstructed. Their bearing was deep and inscrutable, so others could not understand them.

Because they were so difficult to fathom, one can only offer a rough description of what they were like:

Although those skilled in practicing the Dao had dignified bearing that could offer others insight, their minds were calm and at ease, and the luminous quality of their De (Virtue/Power) arose naturally. Their inner virtue and breadth of spirit were beyond scrutiny. One can therefore only roughly describe their outward manner, using signs of their accord with nature to guide and transform ordinary people.

Cautious! Like someone crossing a river in winter.

The commentary here only notes that this line “offers a rough description of what they were like”; it has not yet explained the line itself.

疏:夫惟善士,虽正容可以悟物,而宇泰发於天光,德量难窥,故强为容状,且求委顺之迹,将以引化凡愚。 豫兮若冬涉川, 疏:豫,闲豫也。若,如也。川喻代间爱欲,所以陷溺众生,善士虽处代问,不为爱欲所染,如冬涉川,故多闲豫。冬涉川所以闲豫者,冬冰坚壮,无坠陷之忧尔。 犹若畏四邻, 疏:犹豫,疑难也。夫善士无爱欲,故多闲豫,及观其行事举动施为,恐不合道,故多疑难。如今之人,有事畏四邻知,而加戒慎。 俨若客,涣若冰将释。 疏:善士於爱欲无所造作,如客对主人,但俨然肃敬尔,虽於爱欲如客对主人,而为善之行,不凝滞於物,泱然若春冰之散释,无留碍尔。 敦兮其若朴, 疏:敦,敦厚也。朴,质朴也。言虽不凝滞於物,而绝浮竞,其德行敦厚,若质朴无所分别。 旷兮其若谷, 疏:旷,宽也。 敦兮其若朴, 疏:敦,敦厚也。朴,质朴也。言虽不凝滞於物,而绝浮竞,其德行敦厚,若质朴无所分别。 旷兮其若谷, 疏:旷,宽也。言善士怀道抱德,宇量旷然宽大,於物悉能含受,如彼虚谷,无不包容。 浑兮其若浊。 疏:善士心照清静,而能容物,和同光尘,不自殊异,浑然如浊,物莫能知。 孰能浊以静之,徐清?
Interpretation

Those who are skilled in cultivating the Dao can use their dignified bearing to influence others, yet their hearts are calm and spacious, and their inner light shines forth naturally. Their De and bearing are difficult to fathom. Any attempt to describe their outward appearance is therefore only meant to show how they follow the natural course of things, and to guide and teach ordinary people.

“Cautious, as if crossing a river in winter”: “Cautious” describes an easeful, unhurried manner. The river is a metaphor here for worldly desires, which can cause beings to become immersed and lost. Though virtuous people live in the world, they are not stained by desire, and so remain easy and unhurried, like someone crossing a river in winter. In winter the ice is firm; there is no need to fear falling into the water, and one can walk with a steady heart.

“Watchful, as if wary of neighbors on every side”: “Watchful” describes doubt and caution. Virtuous people are not burdened by desire, so their hearts are at ease. Yet when observing their own words and actions, they worry about whether they accord with the Dao, and so they are always careful and self-reflective. They are like ordinary people who act with particular caution for fear that their neighbors might see them.

“Dignified, like a guest; open, like ice about to melt”: When virtuous people encounter desire, they do not act on impulse. They are like guests in the presence of a host: composed and respectful. At the same time, their good deeds do not become fixed in external things. They unfold freely and without obstruction, like ice about to melt in spring.

“Genuine, like uncarved wood”: “Genuine” means honest and generous; “uncarved” means plain and simple. Though virtuous people do not cling to external things or contend for empty fame, their De is sincere and generous. They are like uncarved wood, making no deliberate distinctions or embellishments.

“Vast, like a valley”: “Vast” means broad and spacious. With the Dao and De in their hearts, virtuous people have a generous spirit and can embrace all things, like an empty valley that has room for everything.

“Blended, like muddy water”: The hearts of virtuous people are clear and still, yet they can also accommodate all things and live in harmony with the world. They do not deliberately make themselves seem different. Blended and reserved, they appear as though murky, and others find them difficult to fathom.

“Who can still the muddy and let it slowly clear?”

疏:因上文云若浊,便举水之澄清,以况善士之心无染,则自然静止。孰能於世间爱欲混浊之中,而以清静道性而静止之,令爱欲不起,亦如水浊而澄静之,令徐徐自清乎?孰,谁也。 孰能安以久,动之徐生? 疏:此教於法无滞也。谁能以清静之性静止爱欲,如水之性。已得徐清,若便安於此清,而久滞,滞则非悟,未名了出,当须更求胜法,运动增修。为道既损之而又损,按行亦次来而次灭,则清静之性,不滞於法,而徐动出也。生犹动出尔法,运动增修。为道既损之而又损,按行亦次来而次灭,则清静之性,不滞於法,而徐动出也。生犹动出尔。 保此道者,不欲盈。 疏:滞法安清,是名盈满,故云若欲保全此徐清徐生之道,当须无所染着,得无所得,令复滞清求生,是伤盈满,则妨道行,故云不欲。 夫惟不盈,故能弊,不新成。 疏:夫能无所凝滞,以至无为,於法无住,不盈满者,常以新证之法为弊薄,更求胜法,不以为新成,而便滞着矣。 致虚极章第十六 前章明玄通之士常保道而不盈,此章明守静之人必归根而复命。复命为知常之要,守静是致虚之由,文相次以转,明理同归於道用,故知常则明了,行道乃久长。 致虚极,守静笃。
Interpretation

The text above speaks of “when turbidity settles,” using muddy water clearing as a metaphor for the good person’s unstained mind naturally returning to tranquility. Who, amid the tangled desires of the world that disturb the mind, can draw on the Dao nature of stillness to quiet themselves, so that desires no longer arise? This is like letting muddy water gradually settle and slowly become clear. “Who” means just that: who can do it?

Who can calmly maintain this stillness without becoming fixed in it, and then let the Dao nature gradually stir and unfold?

The commentary says that this passage teaches people not to become stuck in any one method of cultivation. Who can use the stillness of their nature to quiet desires, as water returns to clarity? Once stillness has gradually been attained, remaining settled in it for a long time creates attachment. Attachment is not awakening, nor is it genuine freedom. One must therefore seek a higher method of cultivation and continue to transform and deepen one’s practice. Cultivation requires continual reduction, layer by layer. Following this sequence, deluded thoughts gradually arise and subside; then the still nature does not become fixed in any particular method but can unfold and manifest step by step. “Unfold” means to stir into activity and become manifest.

One who holds to this Dao does not seek fulfillment or self-satisfaction.

The commentary says that attachment to a particular method and settling into stillness are forms of self-satisfaction. To preserve this Dao of gradually becoming still and gradually unfolding, one must remain unstained and unattached, attaining something without thinking that one has gained anything. If one then clings to stillness or pursues a particular state of unfolding, one falls into self-satisfaction and obstructs cultivation. Hence the phrase “does not seek fullness.”

Precisely because one is not self-satisfied, one can regard what has already been attained as insufficient, continually renew one’s practice, and avoid assuming that one has already achieved something.

The commentary says that those who can avoid stagnation and attachment, reach the state of Wuwei (non-action), and neither cling to any teaching nor become self-satisfied, continually regard each newly attained teaching as still insufficient. They go on seeking a higher method of cultivation and do not cling to it as their final, new achievement.

Chapter Sixteen: Reaching the Utmost Void

The previous chapter says that those who are profoundly attuned to the Dao constantly hold to it without becoming self-satisfied. This chapter says that those who maintain stillness can surely return to the root and recover their life. “Recovering life” is the key to understanding the constant Dao; “maintaining stillness” is the path to attaining emptiness and quietude. The two chapters follow one another in meaning, showing that their principles ultimately return to the workings of the Dao: only by understanding the constant Dao can one truly be attuned to it, and only by acting in accordance with the Dao can one endure.

Bring the mind to the utmost void and steadfastly maintain stillness.

疏:虚极者,妙本也。言人受生皆禀虚极妙本,是谓真性。及受形之后,行道乃久长。 致虚极,守静笃。 疏:虚极者,妙本也。言人受生皆禀虚极妙本,是谓真性。及受形之后,六根爱染,五欲奔驰,则真性离散,失妙本矣。今欲令虚极妙本必自致於身者,当须守此雌静,笃厚性情而绝欲,无为无狭而不厌,则虚极妙本自致於身。亦由水之流湿,火之就燥矣。致者,令必自来,如春秋致师之义尔。 万物并作,吾以观其复。 疏:此明守静笃必致虚极之意。夫万物万形,动作不同,及观其归复,常在於本,《易》曰:雷在地中,复。复者,反本之谓也。故静则归复,动则失本也。 夫物芸芸,各复归其根。 疏:此举喻明观复之意也。根者,本所受气而生也。今观万物,花叶芸芸,及其生性,皆其根。 疏:此举喻明观复之意也。根者,本所受气而生也。今观万物,花叶芸芸,及其生性,皆复归於其根而更生,虚极妙本,人所禀而生也。今观情欲熙熙,能守静致虚,则正性归复命元而长久矣。本作云云者,如注释之。 归根曰静,静曰复命。 疏:物归根则安静,人守静则致虚。木之禀生者根,归,根故复命。人之禀生者妙本,今能守静致虚,可谓归复所禀之性命也。
Interpretation

The utmost void is the subtle and wondrous source. At birth, everyone receives this utmost void and wondrous source; this is one’s true nature. After taking shape, one must continue to follow the Dao (the Way) for life to endure.

Bring the mind to the utmost point of emptiness and stillness, and steadfastly preserve clarity and calm.

The utmost void is the subtle and wondrous source. At birth, everyone receives this utmost void and wondrous source; this is one’s true nature. Once the body has formed, the six faculties—the eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and mind, or the six capacities for perception and awareness—become tainted by love and desire and are drawn along by all manner of cravings. True nature then disperses and loses its subtle and wondrous source. To bring that source back within oneself, one should preserve gentleness and stillness, cultivate a sincere and settled nature, cut off desires, and practice Wuwei (non-action), without narrowness or aversion. Then the utmost void and wondrous source will return naturally. This is like water naturally flowing toward low, damp places and fire naturally tending toward what is dry. “Bring about” means to ensure that something arrives, as in the phrase “bring about a battle” in the Spring and Autumn Annals.

All things grow and move together; from this, I observe how they return.

This explains that steadfastly preserving stillness enables one to reach the utmost void. All things take different forms and move in different ways, but when we observe their final destination, we often find that they return to their source. The Book of Changes says, “Thunder within the earth: Return.” Here, “return” means going back to the source. Stillness therefore enables all things to return to their source, while agitation causes them to lose it.

The myriad things flourish in profusion, yet each in the end returns to its root.

The myriad things serve here as a metaphor for the principle of observing their return to the source. The “root” is the original basis from which all things receive the breath of life and grow. Look at the myriad things: their flowers and leaves may flourish, but their lives all originate in the root.

Here the myriad things again serve as a metaphor for the principle of observing return to the source. The “root” is the original basis from which all things receive the breath of life and grow. Though the flowers and leaves of the myriad things flourish, their lives ultimately return to the root, from which they grow anew. The subtle and wondrous source that people receive is the same: though emotions and desires may become tangled and flourish, if one can preserve stillness and attain emptiness, one’s pure and upright nature will return to the original basis of life, allowing life to endure. The original text includes the phrase “clouds and clouds,” which the commentary explains.

Returning to the root is stillness; stillness is a return to the original basis of life.

When the myriad things return to the root, they become settled and still. When people preserve stillness, they can attain emptiness and calm. Trees receive the breath of life and grow; their root is their foundation. To return to the root is to return to the original basis of life. People are born having received the subtle and wondrous source of the utmost void. If they can preserve stillness and attain emptiness, they too can be said to return to the nature and original basis of life they received at birth.

复命曰常,知常曰明。不知常,妄作凶。 疏:能守雌静笃厚,以致虚极妙本, 致虚则复命,可谓得常矣。能知守常,是曰明了。失常妄作,可谓无常。不常其德,穷凶必矣。注云不恒其德,或承之羞者,《易》恒,可谓得常矣。能知守常,是曰明了。失常妄作,可谓无常。不常其德,穷凶必矣。注云不恒其德,或承之羞者,《易》恒卦文也。 知常容, 疏:知常曰明,明则鉴物,物来必应,无不含容,故曰知常容。 容乃公,公乃王, 疏:能含容应物,乃公正无私,无私则天下归往,是谓王矣。 王乃天,天乃道, 疏:惟天为大,唯王则之,其德同天而无不覆,故云王乃天。王德如天,则无为而理,道化乃行,故云乃道。 道乃久,殁身不殆。 疏:言守静政虚,归根复命,其德如此,可以为王。王德合天,能行其道,道行则久享福祚,天下之人就之如日,戴之如天,泽之如雨,望之如春,则终殁政虚,归根复命,其德如此,可以为王。王德合天,能行其道,道行则久享福祚,天下之人就之如日,戴之如天,泽之如雨,望之如春,则终殁其身,复何危殆之事?故云殁身不殆。 太上下知章第十七
Interpretation

Returning to the root is called “constancy”—the enduring, unchanging principle. Understanding the constant Dao is called “clarity.” Those who do not understand the constant Dao and act recklessly will bring danger upon themselves.

If one can maintain a gentle, still, and steadfast state of mind, reach the utmost emptiness and stillness, and perceive the wondrous root, one can return to the root—that is, return to the constant Dao. To understand and uphold the constant Dao is to be clear-sighted. To stray from it and act recklessly is to lose constancy. When De does not endure, one will ultimately fall into danger. The Jing of Changes, in its “Hexagram Heng” commentary, says, “If one cannot maintain De, one may suffer humiliation.” This expresses the same principle.

Understanding the constant Dao enables one to embrace all things.

A clear-sighted person can see things as they are. Whatever comes before them, they respond appropriately and make room for it. That is why it says, “Knowing constancy, one embraces all.”

Embracing all things makes it possible to be fair and impartial. When one is fair and impartial, people throughout the world will turn to one. This is what it means to be a “king.”

A king to whom the world turns can take Heaven as a model. Heaven is vast and impartial; following its example, the king’s beneficence covers all things like Heaven itself. That is why it says, “The king models himself on Heaven.”

When the king’s De accords with the way of Heaven, he can govern the world through Wuwei, allowing the Dao’s teaching to take effect. That is why it says, “Heaven models itself on the Dao.”

When the Dao’s teaching takes effect, it can endure. By maintaining stillness and humility, and returning to the root and to the constant Dao, the king can attain this state of De. When his De accords with the way of Heaven and he can put the Dao into practice, he can enjoy blessings for a long time. People throughout the world draw near to him as they turn toward the sun, revere him as they look up to the sky, receive his beneficence as they bask in a gentle rain, and await him as they await spring. In this way, he will face no danger throughout his life. That is why it says, “Until the end of life, there is no danger.”

“The Chapter on the Great High One and Those Below Who Know,” seventeenth, Qu.

此章上论淳古之风,下逮浇漓之俗,欲明失道之渐,将辩致弊之由,故前章明守静则致虚,此章示无为则复朴,朴散则亲誉遂作,无为则谓我自然,庶夫道化之君,专此不言之教。 太上,下知有之。 疏:太上者,淳古之君也。谓为太上者,尊之也。言太上之君处无为之事,行不言之教,臣下但知上有君,尊之如天,大而在上,被四时生育之美,不知何以称其德,故云下知有之。 其尊之也。言太上之君处无为之事,行不言之教,臣下但知上有君,尊之如天,大而在上,被四时生育之美,不知何以称其德,故云下知有之。 其次,亲之誉之。 疏:太上之君殁,黄帝尧舜氏作,施教行善,仁及百姓,故亲之。柔弱致平,功高天下,故誉之。亲誉生前人之迹,矫徇为后代之患,故《庄子》曰:吾语汝!大乱之本,必生尧舜之间。何也?以其迹存乎千载之后故尔。 其次,畏之侮之。 疏:黄帝尧舜氏殁,下及三王五霸,浸以凌迟,严刑峻制,故畏之。明不能察,故侮之。下议罪而求功,上赏奸而生诈,相蒙若此,可谓寒心。 信不足,有不信。
Interpretation

The simple and honest ways of high antiquity gradually declined, and social customs later became increasingly corrupt. This chapter explains how people lost the Great Dao step by step, and where the various ills came from. The previous chapter said that guarding stillness can lead to emptiness and quiet; this chapter says that Wuwei (non-action) can bring people back to simplicity. Once simplicity is lost, closeness and praise arise in its place. If people can practice Wuwei, they will regard everything as simply happening of itself. A ruler who hopes to bring about the transformation of the Dao should devote himself to this way of teaching without words.

The highest kind of ruler is one whom the people only know exists.

“Supreme” refers to the rulers of the simple, ancient age; it is an honorific title for them. Such rulers follow Wuwei and do not use words to teach. Their subjects know only that a ruler is above them, and honor him as they honor Heaven. He occupies the highest place and nurtures all things as the seasons turn, yet people cannot say precisely what his De (Virtue/Power) is. That is why it says, “The people only know that he exists.”

The next best ruler is one whom the people cherish and praise.

After the highest kind of ruler had passed away, the Yellow Emperor, Yao, and Shun appeared in succession. They taught the people and promoted good government, extending benevolence to them; therefore, the people cherished them. They were gentle and humble, bringing peace to the realm, and their achievements were widely recognized; therefore, the people praised them. But when people cherish and praise a ruler, they leave behind deeds for later generations to imitate. If those who come after them deliberately pursue such outward achievements, trouble may follow. That is why the Zhuangzi says, “I tell you: the source of great disorder must surely have arisen between the time of Yao and Shun.” Why does it say this? Because their deeds were handed down for a thousand years, and later generations might become bound to those examples.

The next ruler after that is one whom the people fear and despise.

After the Yellow Emperor, Yao, and Shun had passed away, the age gradually declined. By the time of the Three Kings of the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties and the Five Hegemons of the Spring and Autumn period, rulers had increasingly resorted to harsh punishments and severe laws, so the people feared them. When rulers lack the insight to see clearly and understand what is truly happening, the people despise them. Subordinates pursue private gain when discussing punishments, while those in power reward wicked people and thereby encourage deceit. When those above and below conceal the truth from one another, the situation is truly chilling.

When trust is insufficient, the people will not trust their ruler.

This sentence again explains that the people despise a ruler because he lacks the insight to see clearly. Subordinates pursue personal advantage when discussing guilt, while those in power reward wicked people and thereby encourage deceit. When those above and below conceal the truth from one another, the situation is truly chilling.

疏:此复释畏之明不能察,故侮之。下议罪而求功,上赏奸而生诈,相蒙若此,可谓寒心。 信不足,有不信。 疏:此复释畏之也。百姓畏君之刑法,侮君之教令者,皆为君信不足於下,故令下有此不信之人尔。 犹其贵言。 疏:此复释亲之誉之也。百姓所以亲爱君之善行,称誉君之功业者,由君有德教之言,故贵重君言而称誉之尔。古犹字与由字通用。 功成事遂,百姓皆谓我自然。 疏:此复释太上下知也。夫淳朴不残,孰为牺樽?道德公行,亲誉焉设?故太上之世,下忘帝力,适令功成事遂,百姓皆以为自然合尔,不知所以亲誉报施也。 大道废章第十八 前章明步骤,殊时道存,故淳朴不散。此章明风俗,颓弊失道,则仁义遂行。秃施髢而病求医,虽云由愈,数米炊而简发栉,何其伤性,故直举八句,道,则仁义遂行。秃施髢而病求医,虽云由愈,数米炊而简发栉,何其伤性,故直举八句,将以明其极弊,冀还返於淳古也。 大道废,有仁义。 疏:大道废者,代俗浇漓,人人浮竞,玄晏之风斯泯,穆清之化不存,失至道无为之事,故云废也。废则有兼爱之仁,裁非之义,踧足薛於其间矣。故庄子曰:道隐於小成。小成谓仁义等,各自其成,不能大通,故谓之小成尔。 智慧出,有大伪。
Interpretation

“When the common people fear the ruler’s punishments and treat his commands lightly,” this is because the ruler has lost their trust. As a result, some people no longer believe in him.

“The ruler cherishes his own words.” This further explains why the people draw close to the ruler and praise him. They cherish his good deeds and praise his achievements because his words of moral instruction are worthy of esteem. That is why they praise him. Here, the word you is used in the same sense as you (“because of”).

“Once the work is done and the achievements completed, the people all regard it as something that happened naturally.” This further explains the saying, “Of the best rulers, the people only know that they exist.” In an age of simplicity and naturalness, the people’s nature has not been harmed. What need would there be to make wine vessels? When the Great Dao and De are put into practice naturally, what need is there to draw close to or praise the ruler? Thus, when the best ruler governs the world, the people forget the ruler’s achievements. Once the work is done, they simply feel that everything happened as it should, unaware that they ought to draw close to and praise the ruler in return for his kindness.

Chapter Eighteen: When the Great Dao Is Abandoned

The previous chapter discusses how the presence or absence of the Dao relates to the character of an age: when the Dao remains, the people’s customs are simple and sincere, and this simplicity is not lost. This chapter explains that when customs deteriorate and the Dao is lost, ideas such as benevolence and righteousness arise in its wake. The commentaries compare this to putting on a wig after going bald, or seeking a doctor after falling ill. Though things may seem better after these remedies, the original state has already been lost. It is also like counting grains of rice to prepare a meal or combing the hair one strand at a time: such efforts are petty and laborious, and they damage one’s nature. The classic directly lists eight conditions to show that the world’s decline has reached its extreme, and to urge people to return to the simplicity of ancient times.

“Only when the Great Dao is abandoned do benevolence and righteousness arise.” The abandonment of the Great Dao means that the customs of the age have become shallow and corrupt, people are restless and competitive, and the atmosphere of calmness and harmony has disappeared, along with clear and balanced moral instruction. People have lost the way of following the Great Dao and governing through Wuwei (non-action). Thus, it becomes necessary to promote “benevolence,” which means caring for others, and “righteousness,” which means judging right and wrong. These ideas then proliferate. Zhuangzi says, “The Dao is obscured by partial achievements.” Here, “partial achievements” refers to the separate doctrines of benevolence, righteousness, and the like, each advancing its own principles. Because they cannot be integrated into a whole, they are called “partial achievements.”

“When wisdom comes to prominence, great hypocrisy appears.”

疏:智慧出者,谓后代之人役用智慧,立法以检俗,制典以诂奸。恐其不信,作符玺以信之。恐其不平,为斗斛以成尔。 智慧出,有大伪。 疏:智慧出者,谓后代之人役用智慧,立法以检俗,制典以诂奸。恐其不信,作符玺以信之。恐其不平,为斗斛以量之。而不仁之人兼盗符玺,并窃斗斛。则夫智慧之作法,适足侈大其诈伪,故云有大伪矣。 六亲不和,有孝慈。 疏:六亲者,父子兄弟夫妇也。夫大同之俗,无自私之亲,及乎上下不和,怨恩私起,则有扇枕温席,人谓之孝。出复入顾,人谓之慈。被慈孝之名,有自矜之色,殊不知大道之代,天下为家,上承下绥,自然之分足。视人犹己,不独亲其亲,则天下之人皆可孝也。人亦视之犹己,不独子其慈。被慈孝之名,有自矜之色,殊不知大道之代,天下为家,上承下绥,自然之分足。视人犹己,不独亲其亲,则天下之人皆可孝也。人亦视之犹己,不独子其子,则天下之人,皆可慈也。则孝慈之名,复何所施乎? 国家昏乱,有忠臣。
Interpretation

The sages’ commentary says that the “emergence of wisdom” refers to later generations using clever schemes to establish laws that restrain customs and compile codes to punish wrongdoing. Fearing that people would not honor their agreements, they made tally tokens and seals as proof of trust. Fearing that weights and measures would be unfair, they made measuring vessels such as the dou and hu to measure goods.

“When wisdom emerges, great hypocrisy follows.” The commentary explains that the unkind would also steal tally tokens and seals, or even tamper with measuring vessels. Laws and instruments were originally made to uphold truth and trust, yet they instead gave deception and hypocrisy new means. That is why the text speaks of “great hypocrisy.”

“When kinship is discordant, filial devotion and parental care emerge.” The commentary says that the six relations are father and son, elder and younger brothers, and husband and wife. In ancient times, customs were simple and the whole world was like one family. People cared not only for their own kin but also treated others as they treated themselves. A father’s care and a child’s filial devotion arose naturally, so there was no need to make special claims about “filial devotion” and “parental care.” Later, as those above and below fell out of harmony, resentment and favoritism took root. Only then did acts such as fanning a pillow to cool it or warming a bed for an elder come to be praised as filial devotion, and acts such as worrying about one’s children at home while away come to be praised as parental care. People who earned a reputation for filial devotion or parental care might then boast of it. If everyone treated others as they treated themselves—caring not only for their own parents and cherishing not only their own children—then everyone in the world could be called filial and caring, and there would be no need to single out these qualities for praise.

Only when the state is in disorder do loyal ministers appear.

疏:忠者,人臣之职分,而云有忠臣者何?由人主失御臣之道,令佞主之人获进,亲君於昏暗,使生祸乱,则有见危致命,蒙死难以匡社稷,而获忠臣之名。若夫道化大行,无为清静,圣皇多士,尽是夔龙,彝伦攸序,无死难以匡社稷,而获忠臣之名。若夫道化大行,无为清静,圣皇多士,尽是夔龙,彝伦攸序,无非作乂,然后忠孝之名息,淳朴之道兴,则於忠臣孝子何有?此四者颓弊之极也,焉得不返之於淳朴乎? 唐玄宗御制道德真经疏卷之二竟 4-唐玄宗御制道德真经疏卷之三 唐玄宗御制道德真经疏卷之三 绝圣章第十九 前章明风俗颓弊,失道而仁义遂行。此章明绝弃多门,还淳则盗贼无有。首六句且绝矜徇之迹!次三句将明立教之方,后四句示行门之由趣尔。 绝圣弃智,民利百倍。 疏:圣者,有为制作之圣盗贼无有。首六句且绝矜徇之迹!次三句将明立教之方,后四句示行门之由趣尔。 绝圣弃智,民利百倍。 疏:圣者,有为制作之圣。智者,凡俗矜徇之智。制作之圣则有迹,矜徇之智则非真。失真是生巧伪,逐迹坐令丧本,故皆绝弃之而令其淳朴。天和既畅,矜徇不行,是人有百倍之利也。 绝仁弃义,民复孝慈。
Interpretation

Loyalty is originally a minister’s duty. Why, then, do we go out of our way to praise “loyal ministers”? It is because rulers have failed to fulfill their responsibility to govern their ministers, allowing treacherous and sycophantic people to gain office, approach the ruler, and obscure the affairs of state, thereby bringing about calamity and disorder. Some people then risk death to face danger and put their lives on the line to uphold the state, earning the name “loyal ministers.”

If the Dao’s teachings were widely practiced, government would be clear and ordered through Wuwei (non-action), society would be stable, and an enlightened ruler would be surrounded by capable ministers, all as worthy as Kui and Long, legendary ministers of ancient times. Human relationships and social principles would each be in their proper order, and everyone would be able to manage affairs well. No one would then need to risk death to uphold the state, and there would no longer be a name such as “loyal minister.” When the titles “loyal minister” and “filial child” cease to be celebrated, and the Way of simplicity flourishes, why would anyone need to single out loyal ministers and filial children? Loyalty, filial piety, benevolence, and righteousness stand out as ideals only when social customs have declined to their lowest point. How could such a state of affairs fail to call for a return to simplicity?

End of volume two of The Commentary on the True Scripture of the Dao and Its Virtue, Imperial Composition of Emperor Xuanzong of Tang

Volume Three of The Commentary on the True Scripture of the Dao and Its Virtue, Imperial Composition of Emperor Xuanzong of Tang

Chapter Nineteen: Abandon Sageliness

The previous chapter discussed how social customs decline and people lose the Dao, giving rise to teachings about benevolence and righteousness. This chapter discusses removing excessive doctrines so that people may return to simplicity and thieves will disappear. The first six lines call for an end to self-praise and deliberate displays. The next three explain how to establish teachings, while the final four describe how to put them into practice.

“Abandon sageliness and discard wisdom, and the people will benefit a hundredfold.”

Commentary: Here, “sageliness” refers to sages who deliberately impose their will and establish institutions. “Wisdom” refers to the cleverness of ordinary people who pride themselves on it and deliberately show it off. Deliberate construction leaves traces of human artifice, while boasting and showing off one’s cleverness are not true wisdom. When what is genuine is lost, cunning and deceit arise; when people pursue outward forms, they lose what is fundamental. These practices should therefore all be discarded so that the people may return to simplicity. When natural harmony flows freely and the habit of boasting and showing off cleverness no longer prevails, the people will benefit a hundredfold.

“Abandon benevolence and discard righteousness, and the people will return to filial piety and compassion.”

疏:前章云大道废,有仁义,此云绝仁弃义,民复孝慈者,明大道之世,所谓玄同,民无私亲,悉皆慈孝,故理至则迹灭,事当而名去。今六纪废绝则孝慈名彰,若绝兼爱之仁,弃裁非之义,江湖无濡沬之进,慈孝有自然之素,故民复於大孝慈矣。 绝巧弃利,盗贼无有。 疏:绝巧者,绝雕琢非法淫过之巧。弃利者,弃徇财兼并乾没之利。夫盗贼者生於羡欲不足,令绝巧则人不争,弃利则人自足,复谁为盗贼乎?故云无有。 此三者以为文不足,故令有所属。 疏:之利。夫盗贼者生於羡欲不足,令绝巧则人不争,弃利则人自足,复谁为盗贼乎?故云无有。 此三者以为文不足,故令有所属。 疏:三者,谓绝圣弃智一也,绝仁弃义二也,绝巧弃利三也。此三者且令绝弃,未有修行,故以为此三者於文不足以垂教,更令有所属着,在下文见素等是也。 见素抱朴,少私寡欲。 疏:欲求绝圣弃智,则常见真素。欲求绝仁弃义,则怀抱质朴。欲求绝巧弃利,则当少私寡欲。三绝虽於文不足四,行则修身有余,将欲禁绝於中心,故必取资於内行尔。 绝学无忧章第二十
Interpretation

The previous chapter says, “Only after the great Dao was abandoned did benevolence and righteousness appear.” Here it says, “Abandon benevolence and righteousness, and the people will return to filial devotion and compassion.” This means that when the great Dao prevailed—in the state of “mysterious sameness,” where all things were naturally connected—people made no distinctions between those close to them and those at a distance, and everyone was naturally compassionate and filial. When a principle is truly put into practice, its outward signs disappear; when something is just right, there is no longer any need for a name to describe it. Now that the guiding principles have fallen into disuse, filial devotion and compassion have become conspicuous as named virtues. If people could set aside benevolence understood as indiscriminate love, and righteousness understood as judging right and wrong through distinctions, they would no longer be like fish in rivers and lakes, forced to moisten one another with their spittle—a metaphor for people helping one another only through strained effort. Compassion and filial devotion would become natural again. In this way, the people could recover genuine filial devotion and compassion.

“Abandon cleverness and self-interest, and thieves and robbers will disappear.”

“Abandon cleverness” means putting an end to contrivances that depart from the right way and to excessive artifice. “Abandon self-interest” means no longer pursuing wealth or taking what belongs to others. Thieves and robbers arise because people crave too much and remain dissatisfied. When people no longer compete for the reputation of being clever or covet private gain, they will naturally learn to be content. Who, then, would become a thief or robber? That is why it says they will disappear.

“These three, stated as mere words, are not enough to teach and transform people; they must also be given a point of return.”

The “three” here are: abandoning sagacity and wisdom as the first, abandoning benevolence and righteousness as the second, and abandoning cleverness and self-interest as the third. Simply saying that these things should be abandoned is not enough; it does not yet explain how to cultivate the Way. The text therefore goes on to give their concrete point of return, namely, “show your plain nature and embrace simplicity; reduce selfishness and lessen desire.”

“Show your plain nature and embrace simplicity; reduce selfishness and lessen desire.”

To avoid venerating sagacity and wisdom, one should continually reveal one’s genuine, plain nature. To avoid clinging to the names of benevolence and righteousness, one should preserve simplicity. To avoid pursuing cleverness and private gain, one should reduce selfishness and lessen desire. The three forms of “abandoning” described above are not complete as words alone. To put them into practice through self-cultivation, one must go further and work from within. To root these faults out of the heart, one must rely on one’s own cultivation.

“Chapter Twenty: Learning to Be Free of Worry”

前章明绝弃多门还淳,则盗贼无有,此章明畏除俗学若昏,故独异於人。首一句标门以示绝,次七句举喻以明理,又一十七句,则盗贼无有,此章明畏除俗学若昏,故独异於人。首一句标门以示绝,次七句举喻以明理,又一十七句格凡圣以对辩,后两句论独行以结成。 绝学无忧。 疏:绝学者,绝有为俗学也。夫人之禀生,必有真素。越分求学,伤性则多。若令都绝不为,是使物无修习,今明乃绝有为过分之学,即庄子所谓俗学,以求复其初者,若分内之学,因性之为,上士勤行,未为不绝也。故曰绝学无。 唯之与阿,相去几何?善之与恶,相去何若? 疏:唯,恭应也。《周礼》曰:先生召,无诺唯而起。阿,慢应也。《汉书》曰:不谁何绾?谓何问也。此举喻也,唯之与阿,同出於口,唯恭则善,阿慢则恶,学之不绝,只在於心。绝之则无忧,不绝则生患。同出於口,故云相去几何?只在於心,故去相去何若?若能了学无学,学相皆空,绝则生患。同出於口,故云相去几何?只在於心,故去相去何若?若能了学无学,学相皆空,於知忘知,不生分别,则唯阿齐致,善恶两忘也。 人之所畏,不可不畏。
Interpretation

The previous chapter says that when elaborate methods are set aside and one returns to simplicity, thieves have no means to arise. This chapter says that when worldly learning is cast aside, one may appear dull on the surface, while in fact becoming distinctive. The opening sentence identifies what must be renounced; the next seven sentences explain the principle through metaphor; seventeen more contrast ordinary people with the sage; and the final two speak of walking the Way alone, bringing the chapter to a close.

Renounce worldly learning, and there will be no troubles.

The “learning” to be renounced here is contrived, worldly learning pursued to excess. People are born with an unspoiled nature; seeking learning beyond what is fitting often harms that nature. This does not mean that people should stop learning altogether or practice nothing. It means that they should abandon worldly learning that goes against their nature and is pursued to excess. As Zhuangzi says of conventional learning, its aim is to restore people to their original state. Learning that is fitting and in accord with one’s nature is precisely what people of the highest character diligently practice; it need not be renounced.

How far apart are a respectful “Yes” and a careless reply? How far apart are good and evil?

“Wei” is a respectful response. The Rites of Zhou says that when a teacher calls a student, the student should not answer casually with “Nuo,” but should respond respectfully with “Wei” and rise. “A” is a careless reply. In the Book of Han, “shui he” means to interrogate or shout a challenge.

The contrast is illustrated through replies: “Wei” and “A” both come from the same mouth, yet respect appears good and carelessness appears evil. Whether one lets go of worldly learning depends on the mind: renouncing it brings no troubles, while clinging to it gives rise to troubles. Since “Wei” and “A” both come from the mouth, the text asks how far apart they really are. Since the distinction between good and evil lies only in the mind, it asks where the difference truly resides.

If one understands that neither learning nor not learning should be clung to, and that the various appearances of learning are empty in themselves, one can also let go of attachment to what one “knows” and cease making distinctions. Then respect and carelessness, good and evil, no longer burden the mind.

What other people fear, one too cannot help but fear.

疏:人之所畏者,畏慢与恶也。夫慢则为过,恶则被嫌。被嫌则人所弃薄,为过则物多尤怨。以况有为俗学,增长是非,若不畏而绝之,是皆违分伤性,故不可畏而绝之也。 荒兮其未央哉。 疏:荒,废也。慢恶为过,俗学失真,是皆可畏,故当绝弃。若不绝而弃之,则正性荒废,其未有央止之时。《诗》曰:夜未央,言更漏尚多也。此云其未央,言俗学伤性无息止期,故前途尚多,云未央也。 众人熙熙,如享太牢,如登春台。 疏:央止之时。《诗》曰:夜未央,言更漏尚多也。此云其未央,言俗学伤性无息止期,故前途尚多,云未央也。 众人熙熙,如享太牢,如登春台。 疏:熙熙者,情欲摇动之貌。此明不畏绝俗学之人。夫俗学有为,动生情欲,熙熙逐境,役役终身,如馁夫之临享太牢,恣贪滋味。冶容之春台登望,动生爱着。太牢者,牛羊豕也。春台所以为爱着者,谓其卉木滋荣,禽鸟鸣匹,阳和陶然,易淫荡也。故《邠诗》云:春日迟迟,采蘩祁祁,汝心伤悲,迨及公子同归也。 我独怕兮其未兆,和陶然,易淫荡也。故《邠诗》云:春日迟迟,采蘩祁祁,汝心伤悲,迨及公子同归也。 我独怕兮其未兆,如婴儿之未孩。
Interpretation

People fear arrogance and wrongdoing. Arrogance brings mistakes, while wrongdoing earns contempt. Those who are held in contempt are shunned and scorned by others; those who make mistakes also incur much resentment. Seen in this light, worldly doctrines that prize deliberate action foster disputes over right and wrong. If we do not stay alert to them and put them aside, we will betray our proper duties and damage our nature. We should therefore remain alert and abandon them.

How desolate! Who knows when this will end?

Here, “desolate” means neglected and laid waste. Arrogance and wrongdoing lead to mistakes, while worldly learning causes people to lose their original nature. These are all things to be wary of, and so they should be put aside and abandoned. If we do not abandon them, our upright nature will be laid waste, and no one knows when this will end. The Book of Songs says, “The night is not yet halfway through,” meaning that the night is still long and the water clock has not run out. Here, “not yet halfway through” means that the damage worldly learning does to our nature shows no sign of stopping; the road ahead is still long.

Everyone is bustling about, as if attending a lavish feast or climbing a terrace in spring.

“Bustling” describes desires stirring and the spirit being swept along. This refers to people who neither stay alert to worldly learning nor are willing to abandon it. Worldly learning prizes deliberate action and can stir desire, making people eagerly pursue external things and keep themselves busy throughout their lives. They are like hungry people at a lavish feast, greedily savoring its flavors, or like people climbing a springtime terrace to admire the view, becoming attached to its beauty. “Great sacrificial offerings” refers to the three animals—ox, sheep, and pig. A spring terrace can easily inspire attachment because plants flourish, birds call in pairs, and the mild spring weather makes it easy to sink into desire. The “Airs of Bin” in the Book of Songs says: “Spring days lengthen; we gather mugwort in abundance. Your heart grieves—go with the young lord and return.” It depicts the feelings stirred in the heart by a spring landscape.

Only I am cautious and still, my feelings not yet showing, like an infant who does not yet know how to smile.

疏:我,老君自称,言我畏绝俗学,抱道含和,独能怕然安静,於彼世间有为之事,情欲等法,略无形兆。如彼婴儿,未能孩笑,无分别也。孩者,别人之意。《庄子》曰:不至於孩而始谁。 乘乘兮若无所归。 疏:乘乘,运动之貌也。众人动生耽着,常有执求,故若有所归往。我本无心,怕然安静,乘流则逝,值坎而止。若彼行道之人,无所归趣,不汲汲也。 众人皆有余,而我独若遗。 疏:众人俗学耽着,矜夸巧智,是法皆执,自为有余。我独损之,未尝凝滞,心无爱染,故若遗忘也。 我愚人之心也哉,纯纯兮。 疏:言我於诸法中,体了无着,故若遗忘,岂如愚人之心也?但我心纯纯,质朴无爱欲,故若,故若遗忘也。 我愚人之心也哉,纯纯兮。 疏:言我於诸法中,体了无着,故若遗忘,岂如愚人之心也?但我心纯纯,质朴无爱欲,故若遗尔。 俗人昭昭,我独若昏。俗人察察,我独闷闷。 疏:昭昭,自矜衒巧智也。若昏者若昏昧无所分别也。察察者,施教立法以绳下也。闷闷者,无心宽大之意也。所以昭昭矜衒,察察施教者,皆由不绝俗学与有为,故圣人畏绝,若昏默也。 忽若晦寂兮,似无所止。
Interpretation

I, the Old Master’s self-designation, revere and renounce worldly learning, hold fast to the Great Dao, and nurture inner calm, keeping to myself in quiet simplicity. In matters of deliberate action in the world and the laws of desire and emotion, I leave almost no trace, as though I were an infant who cannot yet laugh or make distinctions. “Child” can also mean “to laugh.” The Zhuangzi says: “Before an infant has begun to laugh, we already know who he is.”

“Moving along and along” describes the manner of motion. When people act, they are often immersed in attachment and always seek something, as if they know where they are going. I, by contrast, have no intention of my own. Quiet and untroubled, I move with the current and stop when I meet an obstacle. It is like a traveler on the Way who does not insist on reaching some particular destination or hurry after anything.

People are absorbed in worldly learning, showing off their cleverness and skill, and clinging to every pursuit, convinced that they have more than enough in every respect. I alone lessen these attachments, letting my mind remain unbound and unentangled, and neither coveting nor becoming stained by things. Thus I seem to have forgotten something.

I can experience all things without clinging to them, so I seem to have forgotten something. Could this really be the mind of a fool? My mind is simply plain and genuine, without desire or attachment; therefore, I seem to have forgotten something.

I can experience all things without clinging to them, so I seem to have forgotten something. Could this really be the mind of a fool? My mind is simply plain and genuine, without desire or attachment; therefore, I seem to have forgotten something.

People of the world appear clever and quick-witted, skilled at displaying their talents. I, by contrast, seem dull and unaware. People of the world are shrewd and exacting, setting up teachings, commands, and laws to restrain others. I, by contrast, am generous and still, and do not concern myself with every detail. Those who display their cleverness and impose strict teachings do so because they have not renounced worldly learning and remain attached to deliberate action. Therefore, the sage reveres and keeps away from such things, appearing silent and obscure.

Suddenly, all seems dark and still, as though there were no fixed limit.

疏:绝学之人,忽忽无心,常苦昏昧,而心寂然,曾不爱染,於法无往,故似无所止着尔。 众人皆有以,我独顽似鄙。 疏:凡俗之人,不畏俗学,所以耽滞逐境,未曾休息。我於世间,独无分别,有似鄙陋。顽者,无分别也。鄙者,陋不足也。而心实了悟,故云似尔。自众人熙熙下,境,未曾休息。我於世间,独无分别,有似鄙陋。顽者,无分别也。鄙者,陋不足也。而心实了悟,故云似尔。自众人熙熙下,皆对明也。 我独异於人,而贵求食於母。 疏:此两句,结成也。我独异於人者,异於不绝俗学之凡人也。即上对明诸法,与凡人异。凡人爱染有为,我独遗忘情欲。凡人於诸法分别,我独等无是非。故云异於人。而贵求食於母者,老君戒人守朴全和,少私寡欲,绝视听之耽着,杜声名之奔竞。令如婴儿,但求食於母尔,故云而贵求食於母。 孔德之容章第二十一 前章明畏绝俗学若昏,故独异於人。此章明一从顺至道甚真,则能阅众甫。首标孔德两句,明德人之顺道。次道之为物下十句,畅妙本一之精。自古下五句辩应用之名,,故独异於人。此章明一从顺至道甚真,则能阅众甫。首标孔德两句,明德人之顺道。次道之为物下十句,畅妙本一之精。自古下五句辩应用之名,结生成之德尔。
Interpretation

Those who leave worldly learning behind often seem dazed and inattentive, as though dim-witted and confused. Inwardly, however, they are quiet and settled. They never covet or cling to things, nor do they become attached to anything, so they appear to have nothing to rely on.

Everyone else is busy with their undertakings; I alone seem dull and uncouth.

Ordinary people do not know how to stop pursuing worldly learning. They become absorbed in external things, chasing after whatever they encounter without rest. I alone, amid the world, make no distinctions and appear somewhat dull and uncultivated. “Stubborn” means making no distinctions; “uncouth” means seeming crude and inadequate. Inwardly, however, I understand things clearly and fully. The word “seem” shows that this is only how I appear. Here, I am contrasted with everyone else.

I alone am different from everyone else: what I cherish is seeking milk from my mother, as an infant does.

These two lines sum up what came before. I differ from ordinary people who refuse to leave worldly learning behind: they covet things that can be done, while I forget desire; they make distinctions and judgments about all things, while I regard them equally and do not cling to right and wrong. Hence the phrase “different from everyone else.”

“To cherish seeking milk from one’s mother” means that the Old Master urges people to preserve their simplicity and conserve their harmonious Qi, to reduce selfishness and desire, to break free from fixation on sights and sounds, and to stop pursuing fame and status. They should be like infants, seeking milk only from their mother.

Chapter 21: The Appearance of Great De

The previous chapter explains that those who leave worldly learning behind seem dim-witted and are therefore different from everyone else. This chapter explains that by following the utmost truth of the Dao, one can discern the beginning of all things. The opening two lines state that those of great De follow the Dao. The next ten lines explain the Dao’s subtle essence and inner meaning. The five lines beginning “Since ancient times” clarify the names given to the Dao through its workings in the world, and in doing so sum up the De by which the Dao generates all things.

孔德之容:唯道是很。 疏:孔,甚也。从,顺也。容,容状也。欲明行人所以顺合至道,故云甚有德人之容状若何?言甚有德人之容状,唯虚极之道是顺尔。 道之为物,惟恍惟惚。 疏:此明虚极妙本为物形状,即孔德所从之道也。虚极妙本,强名曰道。道之为物,其运动形状若何?言此妙本不有不无,难为名称,欲谓之有,则寂然无象。欲为之无,则湛似或存。无有难名,故谓之为恍惚尔。 惚兮恍兮,其中有象。 疏:此明降生本迹也。惚,无也。恍,有也。兆见曰象。妙本无物,故谓之惚。生化有形,中有象。 疏:此明降生本迹也。惚,无也。恍,有也。兆见曰象。妙本无物,故谓之惚。生化有形,故谓之恍。斯则自无而降有,其中兆见一切物象,从本而降迹也。 恍兮惚兮,其中有物。 疏:物者,即上道之为物,谓妙本也。妙本降生,兆见众象,修性反德,则复归无物。无物即道也。言人修性反德,不离妙本,自有归无,还冥至道,故云其中有物,言有妙物也。此摄迹以归本也。 窈兮冥兮,其中有精。 疏:窈冥,深昧也。虚极降生,修性反本,摄迹归本,妙物或存,窈冥深昧,不可量测,含孕变化,中有有精。
Interpretation

The bearing of a person of great De is simply to follow the Dao.

Kong means “profound”; cong means “to follow”; rong means “bearing” or “form.” This passage explains how a practitioner follows the Dao: a person of deep De has a bearing that follows the Dao of utmost emptiness and stillness.

The Dao seems to be both present and absent, elusive and hard to discern.

This describes the wondrous source of utmost emptiness and stillness—the Dao followed by a person of great De. This source can only be tentatively called the Dao. What is the Dao really like? It cannot be said to exist or not exist. If we say it exists, it is silent and formless; if we say it does not exist, it seems to endure in profound obscurity. Because presence and absence are difficult to distinguish, it is called “elusive.”

Within this elusiveness, images appear.

This describes how the Dao manifests all things from its original substance. Hu refers to absence, while huang refers to presence; the first sign of emergence is called an “image.” The wondrous source is originally formless, so it is called hu. It gives rise to all things, revealing their forms, so it is called huang. In other words, the Dao emerges from formlessness into form, and the images of all things first appear within it. This is the manifestation of traces from the source.

Within this elusiveness, the wondrous source that is the Dao is present.

The “thing” mentioned here is the same “thing” as in the earlier phrase “the Dao as a thing”; it refers to the wondrous source of the Dao. The source gives rise to all things and reveals their many forms. By cultivating one’s nature and returning to one’s original De, one can return to formlessness. Formlessness is the Dao. When people cultivate their nature and return to their original De, they do not leave the wondrous source: they return from form to formlessness and reunite with the great Dao. Thus, “within it there is a thing” means that within it lies a subtle substance. This gathers the manifested traces back into their source.

Within the deep and shadowy, there is subtle Qi.

Yaoming means “deep and shadowy.” After the Dao of utmost emptiness and stillness gives rise to all things, cultivating one’s nature makes it possible to return to the source, gather the traces, and return to the original substance. At this point, the wondrous source is faintly present, profound and hard to fathom, yet it contains the potential for transformation and subtle Qi.

疏:窈冥,深昧也。虚极降生,修性反本,摄迹归本,妙物或存,窈冥深昧,不可量测,含孕变化,中有至精,故云其中有精也。 其精甚真,其中有信。 疏:至道妙物,既本非假杂,变化至精,故其精甚真。生成之功,遍被群有,物感必应,曾不差违,故云其中有信。 自古及今,其名不去,以阅众甫。 疏:阅,度阅也。甫,本始也。言道德生成之功,窈冥真精之信,始终无极,今古不渝,故物得道用之名,天清地宁之类,自古至今,常不去也。故注云:生成之用,既今古是同,应用之名,故古今不去也。以此精真之信,度阅万物本始,令各遂其生成之用尔。 吾何常不去也。故注云:生成之用,既今古是同,应用之名,故古今不去也。以此精真之信,度阅万物本始,令各遂其生成之用尔。 吾何以知众甫之然哉?以此。 疏:又详云吾何知万物本始皆禀於道,道必度阅之,令达其生成用然哉?答云:以此甚精甚信,凡今万物皆禀生成,故知之尔。 曲则全章第二十二 前章明从顺至道甚真,故能阅众甫,此章明抱一为式不争,则所谓曲全者六句示诚全之行,是以下两句标圣行,以明次四句覆释曲全至弊新,夫唯下结不争必全而归尔。 曲则全,
Interpretation

Obscure and deep means profound and difficult to see clearly. When emptiness and stillness reach their utmost, life arises. By cultivating one’s nature and returning to the root, drawing in one’s outward traces and returning to the root, the wondrous workings of all things may become manifest. The Dao is obscure and unfathomable, embracing change; within it lies the most subtle reality. That is why it is said, “Within it there is essence.”

That subtle reality is pure, upright, and without admixture; within it are signs that can be trusted.

The wondrous workings of the Dao are not false or mixed with impurities. The subtle Qi it brings forth is real and pure, which is why it is said, “Its essence is supremely real.” The Dao’s power to generate the myriad things extends through all existence. When the things of the world respond, it invariably answers; it never fails or errs. That is why it is said, “Within it there is trustworthiness.”

From ancient times to the present, the Dao’s name has never disappeared. Through it, we can observe the beginnings of the myriad things.

“Observe” means to look into and examine; “beginnings” means the source. This passage says that the Dao’s power to generate things is profound and real, never exhausted, and consistent from ancient times to the present. Thus the workings of things that follow the Dao—such as the clarity of Heaven and the stillness of Earth—have never disappeared. Since the Dao’s power to generate things is the same in every age, the name by which it appears in the workings of the myriad things has likewise endured from ancient times to the present. By means of the Dao, whose subtle reality is trustworthy and without error, we can observe the beginnings of the myriad things and enable each to fulfill its power to grow and develop.

How do I know that the beginnings of the myriad things are like this? By this principle.

To put it another way: How do I know that the beginnings of all things are received from the Dao, and that the Dao invariably attends to them so they can fulfill their power to come into being? The answer is: because the Dao’s essence is subtle and real, trustworthy and without error. The things before our eyes have all received the Dao and come into being; from this we can know it.

Chapter 22: “Through Yielding, One Is Made Whole”

The previous chapter explained that following the perfectly true Dao enables us to observe the beginnings of the myriad things. This chapter explains that holding to the One of the Dao, taking the Dao as one’s standard, and not contending can bring one to the state of “yielding and remaining whole.” The following six lines explain how one can indeed preserve oneself; the next two identify the conduct of the sage; four more explain the meanings of “yielding,” “whole,” and related terms. Finally, the passage beginning with “For only by not contending” sums up the point: only by not contending can one preserve oneself and return to the Great Dao.

Yielding allows one to remain whole.

疏:曲者,委曲从顺者也。言人能委曲从顺,不与物忤,则可以全身,故云曲则全。 枉则直, 疏:枉者,受屈於物。直者,可以正曲也。《春秋》曰:正曲为直,言人虽不者也。言人能委曲从顺,不与物忤,则可以全身,故云曲则全。 枉则直, 疏:枉者,受屈於物。直者,可以正曲也。《春秋》曰:正曲为直,言人虽不与物忤,若物来枉己,己能受屈,彼必惭惧而自修整,则是己之直可以正曲,故云枉则直。 洼则盈, 疏:洼,坳下。盈,满也。此喻说也。夫地之助下,水铃流满。人守撝谦,德便光大。能曲能枉,坳下也;则全则直,满盈也。故云洼则盈。 弊则新。 疏:弊,薄恶之谓也。曲枉洼等,皆自处弊薄也。能处弊薄,人必推先,故其德行日新矣,故曰弊则新。 少则得,多则惑。是以圣人抱一,为天下式。 疏:夫少自取者,则无失,故云得。多自与者,人必争,故云惑。修身既尔,修道亦然,当须抱守淳一,自全真素。若欲广求异门,则招乱惑,故亡羊必因歧路,丧生谅在多方。是以圣人抱一不离,可为天下法式矣。式,法门,则招乱惑,故亡羊必因歧路,丧生谅在多方。是以圣人抱一不离,可为天下法式矣。式,法也。 不自见故明,
Interpretation

Only those who can yield gently and avoid contending with external things can preserve themselves. Hence the saying, “Yield, and you will be preserved.”

“Bent” refers to being oppressed and wronged by external things; “straight” means correcting what is bent and setting it upright. The Spring and Autumn Annals says, “To correct what is bent is to be upright.” If people do not contend with external things, they can endure even the humiliation those things bring. The other party may then feel ashamed and mend their ways. In this way, one’s own uprightness can correct the other party’s crookedness. Hence the saying, “By being wronged, one becomes upright.”

“Low-lying” refers to a hollow place, while “full” means filled. Water flows down to gather in low places; when people live humbly, their De (Virtue/Power) becomes all the more abundant and radiant. Yielding, being wronged, and dwelling low all mean placing oneself in a humble position. To preserve oneself, become upright, and grow full is like water filling a hollow. Hence the saying, “The low-lying becomes full.”

“Worn and humble” refers to being lowly and without distinction. Yielding, being wronged, and dwelling low all mean willingly placing oneself in a humble position. Those who can be content with lowliness are instead esteemed by others, and their De continually renews itself. Hence the saying, “The humble is renewed day by day.”

Those who seek little will not lose anything; hence the saying, “With little, one gains.” Those who wish to possess too much inevitably provoke contention and so fall into confusion. The same is true of self-cultivation and cultivating the Dao: one should hold fast to purity and unity and preserve one’s original nature. If one broadly pursues various heterodox teachings and doctrines, confusion is easily brought on. Just as sheep often go astray because there are too many branching paths, people often lose their lives because they seek too much in too many directions. Therefore, the sage holds fast to purity and unity and does not depart from the original mind, serving as a model for all under Heaven. “Model” means a standard.

One who does not display oneself is therefore clear-sighted.

疏:此覆释曲则全也。言人能不自见其美,尝委顺於物,其全德日益明白也,故云故明。 不自是故彰, 疏:此覆释枉则直也。言人能为物受枉,不自申说,以为己是,是必无尤。故其直自彰着也,故云故彰。 不自伐故有功, 疏:此覆释洼则盈也。言人不自伐取,尝为谦让,则人不与竞,其功归己。如地坳下,水必盈焉。故云故有功。 不自矜故长。 疏:此覆释弊则新也。言人能守弊薄,不自矜炫,则人必推敬,善行益长,故云故长。 夫唯不争,故天下莫能与之争。 疏:夫唯曲全等行,皆是委顺不争,柔弱既自矜炫,则人必推敬,善行益长,故云故长。 夫唯不争,故天下莫能与之争。 疏:夫唯曲全等行,皆是委顺不争,柔弱既胜於刚强,谦虚自归於枉直,则天下人物谁能与争乎?故云莫能与之争。 古之所谓曲则全者,岂虚言哉?诚全而归之。 疏:此引古以结曲全也。言自古有此曲全之言,岂虚有此言而无实者哉?若能曲顺不逆者,信有全理,归之於己尔,故云诚全而归之。诚,信也。 希言自然章第二十三 前章明抱一为式不争,故所谓曲全,此章明契道忘言执滞,则自同於失。首一句标宗以明理,次五句举喻以申教。故从事下,广理喻以结成。 希言自然。
Interpretation

Not making a show of one’s words and speaking little accords with the Way of nature.

When you do not deliberately display your strengths and often adapt to things around you, your De (Virtue) becomes more evident day by day. Hence the saying, “Yield, and you will remain whole.” Here, “yield” means to bend and accommodate; “remain whole” means to preserve yourself.

When you can bear being wronged for the sake of others, without rushing to defend yourself or insisting that you are right, you will not invite resentment or blame. Integrity will emerge of its own accord. Hence the saying, “Bend, and you will be straight.”

When you do not boast of your achievements and are often willing to defer to others, they will not compete with you for credit, and the credit will instead come to you. Just as water naturally gathers in low-lying places, so the saying goes, “Be low, and you will be filled.”

When you are content with plainness and do not vaunt or flaunt yourself, others will instead esteem and admire you, and your good deeds will continue to grow. Hence the saying, “Be worn, and you will be renewed.”

Precisely because you do not contend, no one under Heaven can contend with you. These ways of yielding in order to remain whole all mean adapting to things and not competing with others. The soft and weak can overcome the hard and strong; humility can also bring a person integrity and fullness. Who under Heaven, then, could contend with such a person?

Could the ancients’ saying, “Yield, and you will remain whole,” really be empty words? It can indeed preserve you, and in the end bring everything back to you. “Genuine” means real and true.

Chapter 23: Sparse Words Accord with Nature

The previous chapter explains that the constant principle of holding to the Dao is non-contention, through which one can yield and remain whole. This chapter explains that those who accord with the Great Dao do not cling to words or fixed opinions, and therefore do not lose the Way of nature. The opening sentence states the central idea; five sayings then use analogy to convey the teaching. From “Those who undertake affairs” onward, the analogies are further explained, bringing the chapter’s teaching to its conclusion.

疏:此明言教不可执滞。希言者,忘言也。夫言者在乎悟道1,悟道则忘言,不可都忘,要其诠理,但自然之理,不当有与不有,希言之义,亦不定言,故以希言之言,用显自然之理,故也。夫言者在乎悟道1,悟道则忘言,不可都忘,要其诠理,但自然之理,不当有与不有,希言之义,亦不定言,故以希言之言,用显自然之理,故云希尔。若能因彼言教,悟证精微,不滞荃蹄,则合於自然矣。故云希言自然。 飘风不终朝,骤雨不终日。 疏:飘风,狂疾之风也。骤雨,暴急之雨也。夫风者所以散物,雨者所以润物,若狂疾暴急,则害物而不久。以况言教所以诠理,若执言滞教,则无由悟了,必失道而生迷。故风雨不可飘骤,言教不可执滞也。欲明忘言,即合自然,故举飘风骤雨之喻尔。 孰为此者?天地。天地尚不能久,而况於人乎? 疏:孰,谁也。设问云:谁为此飘风骤雨者?答云:天地。天地至大,欲为狂暴,尚不能久,况於凡人执滞言教,而为卒暴,不能虚忘,渐致造极,欲求了悟,其孰,谁也。设问云:谁为此飘风骤雨者?答云:天地。天地至大,欲为狂暴,尚不能久,况於凡人执滞言教,而为卒暴,不能虚忘,渐致造极,欲求了悟,其可得乎? 故从事於道者,
Interpretation

Words and teachings must not be clung to rigidly. “Rare speech” means reducing one’s reliance on words. Words serve to help people understand the Dao; once they have understood the Dao, they should let go of words, though they should not abandon them altogether. Words are only a means of explaining principles, while the principles of nature do not fit into fixed notions of “being” or “nonbeing.” Thus, “rare speech” does not prescribe that people must either speak or remain silent. Rather, words are used to make the principles of nature clear. If one can rely on teachings to grasp what is subtle, without clinging to the tool itself as one might to a trap or fishing net, one accords with the Dao of nature.

A gale cannot blow all morning; a torrential rain cannot fall all day.

Gales and torrential rains arrive with great force, but cannot last long. Wind can disperse things, and rain can nourish all things; when they become violent and fierce, however, they harm all things and soon subside. This illustrates that words and teachings are meant to clarify principles. If one clings to phrases and doctrines, one cannot truly understand and instead loses one’s way in the Dao. Just as wind and rain should not rage with sudden force, one should not become rigidly attached to words and teachings. The image of wind and rain shows that only by letting go of attachment to words can one accord with nature.

Who brings about these gales and torrential rains? Heaven and Earth do. Even Heaven and Earth cannot make them last; how much less can people?

The question is who brings about gales and torrential rains. The answer is Heaven and Earth. Vast as they are, Heaven and Earth cannot make gales and torrential rains continue for long. How, then, could ordinary people—if they cling to words and teachings, act in haste, and cannot humbly let go—gradually penetrate the matter and ultimately attain understanding?

Therefore, those who practice the Dao,

疏:从者,顺也。虚极至道,冲用无方,在物则通,未尝凝滞,故凡人欲体斯妙道而顺事2者,不当有所执滞尔,故云从事於道。 道者同於道, 疏:顺同於道之人,故谓之道者,谓能顺事於道,则不凝滞,悟了言教,一无封执,可与道同,故云同於道尔。 德者同於德, 疏:德者,道用之名也,谓其功用被物,物有所得,故谓之德尔。谓体悟之人,顺事於道,岂唯自能了出,抑亦功济苍生。苍生被其德,德者忘其功,凡所施为,同於道用,故云德者同於德尔。 失者同於失。 疏:失者,谓执自能了出,抑亦功济苍生。苍生被其德,德者忘其功,凡所施为,同於道用,故云德者同於德尔。 失者同於失。 疏:失者,谓执滞言教而失道也。夫言教者,道理之筌蹄也,有筌蹄者,乃得鱼兔,今滞守筌蹄,则失鱼兔矣。执滞言教,则失妙理矣。失理则无由得道,是自同於失也。故云失者同於失。 同於道者,道亦得之。同於德者,德亦得之。同於失者,失亦得之。
Interpretation

“Following” means complying with and adapting to things. When emptiness and stillness reach their utmost, one can attain the Great Dao. The Great Dao moves in ways that are far-reaching and without fixed bounds; in its activity among the myriad things, it flows freely without obstruction or stagnation. Thus, anyone who wishes to experience this subtle Great Dao and adapt to things should avoid clinging or becoming rigid. This is why the text says, “engage in the Dao.”

“Those who are of the Dao are united with the Dao” means that those who can follow the Great Dao do not cling or become obstructed. They grasp the principle conveyed by instruction without being bound by its words, and so can accord with the Dao.

“De” is the name for the Dao in its functioning. When the Dao’s activity reaches the myriad things and enables each to attain what it needs, this is called De. Those who realize the Great Dao act in accord with it. They not only come to insight themselves, but also use its power to help living beings. Though living beings receive their beneficence, they do not claim the credit for themselves. Everything they do follows the Dao’s functioning; this is why the text says, “Those who are of De are united with De.”

“Those who are of loss are united with loss” means that clinging to the literal words of instruction can cause one to lose the Dao. Instruction is like a basket for catching fish or a net for catching rabbits: it is a tool that guides people toward understanding. Once the fish or rabbit has been caught, there is no need to cling to the tool. If one holds fast to instruction, one loses the subtle principle to which it points; having lost the principle, one cannot attain the Dao. This is why the text says, “Those who are of loss are united with loss.”

The Dao accepts those who accord with it; De comes to those who accord with De; and loss comes to those who accord with loss.

疏:此明气同则应也,故虎啸风生,鹤鸣子和。性殊则肝胆楚越,道合则夷夏同人。以类相从,物无违者,故同道则道应,同失则失来。犹方诸性殊则肝胆楚越,道合则夷夏同人。以类相从,物无违者,故同道则道应,同失则失来。犹方诸挹月而水流,阳燧照日而火就尔。故云同於道者,道亦得之。 信不足,有不信。 疏:言人之所以不能体了,证理忘言,谓於信悟不足而生惑滞,既生惑滞,则执言求悟。执言求悟,则却生迷倒,是有不信应之也。故云有不信也。 跂者不立章第二十四 前章明理契言忘执滞,则同於失者,此章明自见自是矜伐,故物或恶之。首两句举喻示难求,次四句明虽求亦不得。其於道下,将申戒劝令,有道之人不处。 跂者不立,跨者不行。 疏:跂,举踵而望也。跨,以跨挟物也。此举喻也。夫延颈举踵,欲求远望,翘跂则危,故不可立。以跨挟物,物必为碍,必不可行,亦如众生,自见自是等也。故跂者不立,跨则不行,自见则不明举喻也。夫延颈举踵,欲求远望,翘跂则危,故不可立。以跨挟物,物必为碍,必不可行,亦如众生,自见自是等也。故跂者不立,跨则不行,自见则不明,自是则不彰,断可知矣。 自见者不明,
Interpretation

All things respond to one another because they share the same Qi. When a tiger roars, wind rises; when a crane calls, young cranes answer. People of different temperaments grow distant from one another, like the liver and gallbladder, though both within the body, separated as if they belonged to the states of Chu and Yue. Those with shared aims and interests can draw close and live together, whether they are Yi or Xia people—ancient terms for people from different regions. Things naturally gather according to their kind. Thus, those who accord with the Dao receive a response from the Dao, while those who accord with the loss of the Dao invite its consequences. It is like the fangzhu, an ancient vessel for drawing water, which gathers and releases water when turned toward the moon; or the yangsui, an ancient fire-making device, which draws forth fire when it reflects the sun. So those who accord with the Dao are joined by the Dao.

When faith is insufficient, disbelief arises.

People fail to grasp principles, understand truth, and let go of words because their faith and understanding are inadequate; doubt and obstruction follow. Once doubt takes hold in the heart, people become attached to words and try to reach understanding through phrases and sentences. This only leaves them more confused and mistaken, and so disbelief arises. Thus, when faith is insufficient, disbelief arises.

Chapter Twenty-Four: Standing on tiptoe is unstable; taking long strides will not get you far.

The previous chapter explained that once one grasps the principle, one should forget words and cease clinging to them. This chapter explains that self-display, self-righteousness, and boasting of one’s achievements invite the aversion of other things. The opening two lines use images to show that certain ways of acting are hard to sustain; the next four lines explain that striving deliberately for something does not make it attainable. The text then goes on to urge those who cultivate the Dao not to remain attached to such ways of acting.

Those who stand on tiptoe are unsteady; those who take long strides do not get far.

To stand on tiptoe is to raise one’s heels to look into the distance; to stride is to take long steps. When people stretch their necks and rise onto their heels to see farther, their bodies sway and they cannot stand firmly. Taking steps that are too large can also lead to stumbling and prevent steady progress. This serves as a metaphor for people’s self-display and self-righteousness. Those who stand on tiptoe are unsteady; those who stride too far do not get far. The self-promoting cannot see clearly, and the self-righteous cannot make themselves shine forth. The principle is plain.

Those who think they see clearly cannot, in fact, see clearly.

疏:夫自见之人,失於殷鉴,露才扬己,欲以自明,殊不知动则见尤,物无与者,己之事业,终於昧然,故云自见者不明。 自是者不彰, 疏:言人不能曲全而自以为是,且欲大夸诸己,而以出众为心,求彰名迹,以自光大,直为怨府,人所不堪,众毁日闻,故难彰着。故云自是者不彰力 自伐者无功, 疏:夫谦者德之柄,让者礼之文,苟失斯道,无从而可,况自专固伐取,欲以求功,不让则争,功斯滥矣。故云自伐者无功。 自矜者不长。 疏:盛德若愚,昔贤通议。矜衒名器丑行,则多人所鄙薄,坐不让则争,功斯滥矣。故云自伐者无功。 自矜者不长。 疏:盛德若愚,昔贤通议。矜衒名器丑行,则多人所鄙薄,坐招嗤诮,自矜虽欲求益,胥怨物不推长,故云自矜不长。 其於道也,曰余食赘行。 疏:余食者,残余之食。赘行者,疣赘之行也。残余,食之秽,疣赘,身之病。以此向见自是等行,其於道而论之,如残余疣赘,人所共恶也。谓之赘行者,为自见自是等为德行之疣赘,故云赘行。《春秋》曰:人将不食吾余。《庄子》曰:附疣悬赘,出乎形而侈於性。 物或恶之,故有道者不处。
Interpretation

Those who are eager to display themselves do not learn from the successes and failures of those who came before them. They show off their talents and boast of themselves, thinking this will prove their worth. Yet the more they act to draw attention, the more readily they invite blame, and the harder it is to gain others’ support. As a result, their own endeavors fade into obscurity. Thus, those who display themselves cannot see things clearly.

Those who think themselves right cannot be brought to prominence.

Explanation: People may lack the ability to act with balance and care, yet still consider themselves right and persist in boasting, striving to stand out in the hope of making their name known and elevating themselves. This only arouses resentment and makes them hard to tolerate. Criticism from others comes one after another, and their name is therefore hard to make known. Thus, those who think themselves right cannot be brought to prominence.

Those who boast of their achievements cannot accomplish great things.

Explanation: Humility is the foundation of Virtue (De); yielding credit is an expression of proper conduct. Without the way of deference, it is difficult to accomplish anything. What is more, those who act unilaterally, compete for credit, and seek rewards in the hope of establishing their achievements will fail if they refuse to yield. Their refusal stirs up rivalry, and their achievements lose their proper weight. Thus, those who boast of their achievements cannot accomplish great things.

Those who vaunt themselves cannot endure.

Explanation: People of deep Virtue often appear plain and modest. This is a principle recognized by the worthy of old. Flaunting one’s reputation and status and acting as though one were exceptional invites the disdain of many; looking out only for oneself and refusing to yield brings ridicule as well. Those who vaunt themselves hope to improve their standing, but only incur the resentment of others. They earn no respect and cannot endure. Thus, those who vaunt themselves cannot endure.

In relation to the Dao, these practices are like leftover food and excessive growths. Leftover food is unclean; excessive growths are ailments of the body. Viewed by the standard of the Dao, such conduct as displaying oneself and thinking oneself right is like leftover food and excessive growths: it is loathed by others. The phrase “excessive conduct” refers to such behavior as a growth upon one’s Virtue. The Spring and Autumn Annals says, “Others will not eat my leftovers.” Zhuangzi says, “Warts and hanging lumps of flesh grow upon the body, yet go beyond its nature.”

Because people loathe these behaviors, those who follow the Dao do not engage in them.

疏:此自见自是等,既若余食赘行,凡物尚或恶之而不为,故有道之君子不处身於此事矣。四 有物混成章第二十五 前章明自见自是於道为余食赘行,末云有道不处。此章明曰大三逝赞道,乃先天混成,终令法道自然。首标有物混 前章明自见自是於道为余食赘行,末云有道不处。此章明曰大三逝赞道,乃先天混成,终令法道自然。首标有物混成六句,将明妙本之绝趣,物被其功。次云吾不知下六句,欲表强名之由绪,名亦不可得。故道下六句,示知四大之生育,申戒人君之法。下至终篇,教以法道自然,无为清净耳。 有物混成,先天地生。 疏:有物者,妙物也,即虚极妙本也。将欲申明强名,所由不可,即此道,故云有物尔。言此妙物混然而成,含孕众象,寻其生化,乃在天地之先,故云先天地生尔。 寂兮寥兮,独立而不改,周行而不殆, 妙物混然而成,含孕众象,寻其生化,乃在天地之先,故云先天地生尔。 寂兮寥兮,独立而不改,周行而不殆, 疏:寂寥者,叹有物之体寂寥虚静,妙本湛然,故独立而不移改,物感必应,应用无心,遍於群有,故周行而不危殆。 可以为天下母。
Interpretation

There is a wondrous, undivided presence that existed before Heaven and Earth took shape. Silent and boundless, it exists on its own, naturally, and never changes. Yet its movement extends through all things, without pause or peril. It can be the source and mother of all things under Heaven.

The “wondrous presence” refers to the Dao, profound and still in its emptiness. It embraces all things, and their coming into being and transformation stem from it. Though it is itself silent and empty, it responds to all things and brings them into action. This action is not deliberate, yet it reaches everywhere.

疏:妙本生化,遍於群有,群有之物,无非匠成万物,彼其茂养之德,故可以为天下母尔。母以茂养为义也。 吾不知其名,字之曰道,强为之名曰大。 疏:字者表其德,右者定其体。老君云妙本生化,冲用莫穷,寂寥虚静,不可定其形状。先天地生,难以言其氏族。故吾不知其名,但见其大通於物,将欲表其本然之德,故字之曰道。见其包含,难以言其氏族。故吾不知其名,但见其大通於物,将欲表其本然之德,故字之曰道。见其包含无外,将欲定其至无之体,故强名曰大。凡物先名而后字者,以其自小而成大,以道先字而后名
Interpretation

The mysterious Source gives birth to all things and pervades everything that exists in the world. Nothing is not generated by it. Through its power to nourish all things, it becomes the root of everything under Heaven. For this reason, the word “mother” means nourishing and bringing up.

“I do not know its name, so I call it ‘Dao’ (the Way). If I must give it a name, I call it ‘Great.’”

A designation expresses its qualities; a name identifies its essential nature. The Old Master said that the mysterious Source gives birth to all things and acts with boundless reach. It is still and empty, and has no definite form. It came into being before Heaven and Earth, and its origins are difficult to explain. So I do not know its name. I see only that it reaches through all things, and therefore wish to use “Dao” to express its inherent quality. It encompasses everything and has no bounds, so I reluctantly use the name “Great” to describe its utterly empty, formless nature.

Ordinary things receive a name before they receive a designation because they grow gradually from small beginnings; the Dao, by contrast, receives a designation before it receives a name…

者,

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

Vol. 2 →