中文 · EN

《唐玄宗御制道德真经疏》Vol. 4

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 Vol. 4 / 4 2,341 characters

About this page. The original text of 《唐玄宗御制道德真经疏》 Vol. 4 (Taixuan 太玄部, 4 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 5 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《唐玄宗御制道德真经疏》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

以我无为,令其自化,方欲设教立法,制其奸诈,调而和之,故曰和大怨。必有余怨者,既设教立法不能无迹,斯迹之弊,还与为怨,故云必有余怨。 安可以为善? 疏:设教立法,其进生弊,既有余怨,则安可为善?则是缮性于俗学以求复其初者尔。若能上化清静,无事无为,人有淳朴之风,迹无余怨之弊,方可为善矣。 是以圣人执左契,而不责於人。 疏:左契者,心也。心为、阳藏,与前境契合,故谓之左契尔心圣人立教则有连,有迹则是余怨,故执持此心,使令清静,下以化人,则无情欲,不烦诛责,自契无为矣。 故有德司契,无德司彻。 疏:司,主也。彻,通也。言有德之君,有迹则是余怨,故执持此心,使令清静,下以化人,则无情欲,不烦诛责,自契无为矣。 故有德司契,无德司彻。 疏:司,主也。彻,通也。言有德之君主司心,契则人将自化。无德之主,不能虚心而忘己,唯欲作法以通人,作法则弊生,故为无德尔。 天道无亲,常与善人。 疏:唯天道平施,而与善不欺,故司契清静者,天福其善,则言无不利。立法残伤者,天降以殃,则孽不可这,岂非皇天无亲,唯德是辅者乎? 小国寡民章第八十
Interpretation

When people follow the principle of Wuwei (non-action), they change naturally. Yet one may want to establish teachings and laws to prevent deceit, then use them to bring people’s hearts into harmony. This is called “settling a great grievance.” But resentment is bound to remain. Establishing teachings and laws cannot leave no trace, and the harms that arise from those traces will turn into new resentments. Hence the saying, “There will surely be resentment left over.”

How can this be called good?

Commentary: Teachings and laws may at first be established to improve matters, but in time they give rise to harm. If resentment still remains, how can this be considered good? It is like using worldly learning to adorn one’s nature in the hope of restoring its original state. Only by transforming the world through stillness and Wuwei, without disturbance or forced action, can people retain their simple ways. Governance that leaves no harmful residue of resentment can then be called good.

Therefore, the sage holds the left half of the tally, the contract, but does not demand payment from others.

Commentary: The “left tally” here refers to the heart. The heart belongs to Yang and governs storing; it can accord with the circumstances before it, so it is called the “left tally.” If the sage establishes teachings and laws, traces will be left behind, and resentment may follow. Therefore, the sage keeps this heart and makes it still, then transforms the people from above. When people have no excessive desires, there is no need to burden them with punishments and penalties; they naturally accord with Wuwei.

Thus, a person of De (Virtue/Power) is in charge of the tally, while a person without De is in charge of the che (the enforcement of laws).

Commentary: “In charge” means to oversee; “che” means to put into effect. The passage says that when a virtuous ruler keeps a still heart, the people are naturally transformed. A ruler without virtue cannot empty the heart and forget the self, and instead seeks only to make laws to restrain the people. The more laws there are, the more harms arise; this is why such a ruler is called without De.

The Way of Heaven shows no partiality; it always assists the good.

Commentary: The Way of Heaven acts fairly, supporting good people and never deceiving them. Heaven bestows blessings on the good deeds of those who hold to the tally and remain still, allowing their undertakings to proceed smoothly. For those who make laws and harm the people, Heaven sends calamity, and the consequences of their wrongdoing cannot be undone. Does this not show that Heaven has no favorites and assists only those who have De?

“Chapter Eighty: A Small State with Few People”

前章明法令则生弊,必为余怨之迹。此章明淳朴则至理,自无矜徇之求。初标无为之风以劝勉,示人从君化则理。后明家给人足,无所企求也。 小国寡民,使有什伯之器而不用。 疏:寡,少也。什,伍也。伯,长也。器,材器也。此论淳古之代也。言国小者,明不求大。言人少者,明不求求也。 小国寡民,使有什伯之器而不用。 疏:寡,少也。什,伍也。伯,长也。器,材器也。此论淳古之代也。言国小者,明不求大。言人少者,明不求多。不求大,则心无贪竞。不求多,则事必简易。简易之道立,则淳朴之风着。适使有出人之材器,堪为什伍伯长,以统于人者,亦无所用之矣。 使民重死而不远徙。 疏:徙,迁移也。化归淳朴,政不烦苛。人怀其生,所以重死。敦本乐业,无所外求,各安其居,故不远迁移也。 虽有舟舆,无所乘之。 疏:舟舆之设,本以通水陆,济有无,既无往来,则舟舆弃舍,无所乘用矣。庄子云,至德之代,山无蹊。 疏:舟舆之设,本以通水陆,济有无,既无往来,则舟舆弃舍,无所乘用矣。庄子云,至德之代,山无蹊隧,泽无舟梁。 虽有甲兵,无所陈之。
Interpretation

This chapter continues by explaining that harsh punishments and severe laws bring harm and resentment, while a simple, unadorned way of life allows people to follow their nature and gives them nothing to contend for. It begins by urging rulers to practice Wuwei (non-action), explaining that when the people follow the ruler’s teaching, society can be stable. It then depicts a life in which every household is prosperous and everyone lives in peace, with no need to seek things from outside.

A small state with few people: even if it has tools capable of serving ten or a hundred people, they are not put to use.

Explanation: “Few” means a small number; “ten” means ten people, and “hundred” means a hundred. “Tools” refers both to implements and to talented people. This passage depicts the simple society of ancient times. To say the state is small means that people do not seek to expand its territory; to say the population is few means that they do not seek to increase their numbers. When people do not covet a vast territory, there is no greed or struggle in their hearts. When they do not pursue a large population, affairs become straightforward and easy. Once the Way of simplicity is established, an unadorned way of life can emerge. Even if there are outstanding people capable of serving as leaders over groups of ten, fifty, or a hundred, there is no need to put them in such roles.

Make the people cherish life and not readily move far away.

Explanation: “Move” means to relocate. When teaching guides people back to simplicity and government orders are neither numerous nor harsh, people cherish their lives. The people value what is fundamental and are content with their own occupations. With no desire to seek things elsewhere, they each remain settled where they are and do not migrate far away.

Even if there are boats and carts, there is no need to ride in them or use them.

Explanation: Boats and carts are made to travel by water and land and to transport goods. When there is no need for travel or transport, boats and carts can be left unused. The Zhuangzi says that in an age of utmost De (Virtue), there were no roads in the mountains and no boats or bridges across the waters.

Even if there are armor and weapons, there is nowhere that requires them to be displayed or deployed.

疏:甲兵所陈,本以讨不服,御寇敌,上行道德,下无离异,既却攻战之事,则甲兵韬戢,而无所陈也。 使民复结绳而用之。 疏:古者书契未兴,结绳纪事,故《系辞》云,上古结绳而理,后代圣人易之以书契,欲明结绳之代,人人淳朴,文字既兴,是生诈伪,今将使人忘情去欲,归于淳古,故云使人复结绳而用之。 甘其食,美其服, 疏:食之甘者,在于适。适则所食皆甘。服之美者在于当,当则所服皆美。苟不适当,虽玉食锦衣,不足称其甘美也。 安其居,乐其俗。 疏:无欲,故所居则安。化淳,故其俗可乐。若皆甘。服之美者在于当,当则所服皆美。苟不适当,虽玉食锦衣,不足称其甘美也。 安其居,乐其俗。 疏:无欲,故所居则安。化淳,故其俗可乐。若逐欲无节,将自不安其居,政苛日烦,焉得复乐其俗? 邻国相望,鸡犬之声相闻,民至老死不相往来。 疏:邻国相望,鸡犬相闻,盖言其近。人至老死不相往来者,由彼此俱足,无所求及故尔。 信言不美章第八十一
Interpretation

Armies and weapons (“armor and arms”) are meant to punish those who refuse to submit and to defend against enemies. If those in power put the Dao and De into practice, so that the people do not scatter or contend with one another, warfare will cease and weapons can be put away and left unused.

Have the people return to keeping records by tying knots. In ancient times, before writing and carved marks existed, people recorded events with knots in cords. The Xici says, “In the earliest times, people governed affairs by tying knots; later, sages replaced this with writing and carved marks.” This means that people in the age of knotted cords lived simply. With the rise of writing came deceit and falsity. Now the people are to let go of fixations, lessen their desires, and return to the simplicity of ancient times. Hence the instruction to have them keep records by tying knots again.

Have the people find their food fragrant and their clothes beautiful. Whether food tastes good depends on whether it meets people’s needs; food that suits them tastes good. Whether clothes are beautiful depends on whether they fit and are appropriate; clothes that fit feel beautiful. If they do not meet people’s needs, even rare delicacies and splendid brocade garments may not seem delicious or beautiful.

Have the people live in peace and take pleasure in their own customs. When desires are few, people can feel at ease where they live; when customs are simple and honest, they are content with them. If people pursue desires without restraint, they naturally cannot live in peace. And when decrees are harsh and disturbances grow, how could they take pleasure in their own customs?

Neighboring states can see one another and hear the crowing of roosters and barking of dogs, yet their people do not visit one another, even into old age. This means the neighboring states lie close together. Their people do not visit because each side is self-sufficient and has nothing it needs to seek from others.

The chapter “Trustworthy Words Are Not Beautiful,” chapter eighty-one.

上下二篇,通明道德。始标宗旨,以开众妙之门。终结会归,将通得意之路。故寄信美以彰言教,论辩善以戒修行。书知博以示迷误,陈不积以教忘遣。假有多以畅法性,结不争以明圣人。将令学者造精微於言象之中,导筌蹄於理性外。悟教而能忘教,何必杜口於毗耶?因言以明无言,自可了心於柱下尔。 信言不美, 之中,导筌蹄於理性外。悟教而能忘教,何必杜口於毗耶?因言以明无言,自可了心於柱下尔。 信言不美, 疏:信言者,圣教信实之言也。此老君欲以自明所演言教,化导众生,实为精信,故与俗相违,代人以为不美。 美言不信。 疏:美言,谓代教甘美之言也。言多浮华,动合于俗,既非信实,不可化人。信言所以不美,正以代教美言不信故尔。 善者不辩, 疏:悟教之善,在于修行,行而忘之,曾不执滞,故不辩说也。 辩者不善。 疏:但能辩说言教,曾不悟了,修行惑滞既多,故不为善。 知者不博, 疏:知,了悟也。博,多闻也。言体道了悟之人,在乎精一,不在不悟了,修行惑滞既多,故不为善。 知者不博, 疏:知,了悟也。博,多闻也。言体道了悟之人,在乎精一,不在多闻,故《庄子》云:博溺心也。 博者不知。
Interpretation

The Dao De Jing is divided into two parts, which together explain the principles of the Dao and De. Its opening states its purpose, opening a path into the many subtle and mysterious principles. Its conclusion draws the work together, pointing to a way of bringing its teachings into unity and grasping their essence. The classic therefore uses “Trustworthy words are not beautiful” to explain the role of verbal teaching; “Those who are good do not argue” to caution practitioners; and “Those who know are not widely learned” to point out where one can easily lose one’s way. It uses “not accumulating” to teach people to let go of grasping, uses “being” to reveal the nature of things fully, and ends with “not contending” to describe the state of the sage.

In this way, the text guides students to discern subtle principles through words and images, and, with the help of metaphor and guidance, to approach truths that lie beyond verbal expression. Once they have understood the teaching, they can also let go of attachment to it. Why, then, would they need to remain silent, like the layman Vimalakīrti of the city of Vaiśālī? By using words to explain what cannot be spoken, one can understand the nature of the mind and innate nature through Laozi.

Trustworthy words are not beautiful.

The commentary explains: “‘Trustworthy words’ means words in the sage’s teaching that are true and reliable. The Old Master speaks these teachings to guide and transform living beings. Their content is sincere and trustworthy, and so runs counter to worldly convention: it may not sound pleasing or beautiful.”

Beautiful words are not trustworthy.

The commentary explains: “‘Beautiful words’ means words that sound sweet and pleasing. Such words are often showy and cater to worldly tastes; they are neither true nor capable of truly transforming people. Trustworthy words are not beautiful precisely because beautiful words that cater to worldly tastes are often untrustworthy.”

Those who truly practice goodness do not argue.

The commentary explains that the good in understanding the teaching lies in putting it into practice. After acting on it, one does not become attached to one’s deeds; therefore, one does not argue.

Those who like to argue do not truly practice goodness.

The commentary explains that those who merely talk about the teaching without understanding or putting it into practice are often confused and attached in their cultivation. They therefore cannot be called good.

Those who truly understand do not pursue wide learning.

The commentary explains: “‘Knowing’ means understanding; ‘wide learning’ means hearing much. Those who realize the Great Dao value focused depth, not knowing a great deal. The Zhuangzi says, ‘Wide learning can cause the mind and spirit to sink into confusion.’”

Those who are widely learned do not necessarily truly understand.

疏:夫多闻则滞于言教,滞教则终日言而不尽,既非了悟,故曰不知。 圣人不积。 疏:积,滞聚也。圣人妙达理源,深明法性,悟文字虚假,了言教空无,所说之理既明,能说之言亦遣,则于彼言教,一无滞积,故云圣人不积尔。 既以与人己愈有,既以与人己愈多。 疏:既,尽也。言圣人虽不积滞言教,然众生发明慧心,必资圣人诱导,故圣人以清静理性,尽与凡愚而教导之。於圣人慧解之性,曾不喊耗,故云愈有愈多。注云:有,必资圣人诱导,故圣人以清静理性,尽与凡愚而教导之。於圣人慧解之性,曾不喊耗,故云愈有愈多。注云:有,明自性。多,明外益者,悟理之性既非他有,故云自性。因教之益不自中来,故云外益。明圣人教导凡愚,心弥慧解,故云愈有。惟敩学半,理益精畅,故云愈多尔。 天之道,利而不害。 疏:天道施生,长养万物,利也。无所宰割,不害也。此举喻欲明圣人之道弘益尔。 圣人之道,为而不争。 疏:圣人之道,凡所作为,而与物不争者,为圣人无所积滞,与人愈有是以不争尔。 唐玄宗御益尔。 圣人之道,为而不争。 疏:圣人之道,凡所作为,而与物不争者,为圣人无所积滞,与人愈有是以不争尔。 唐玄宗御制道德真经疏卷之
Interpretation

Those who are widely learned and well informed can easily become trapped by words, texts, and doctrines. Once they cling to doctrine, they may talk about it all day and still never finish. This is not true understanding, which is why it is called “not knowing.”

The sage does not accumulate.

“Accumulate” means to linger over or gather things up. The sage deeply understands the source of things and the nature of all beings, and sees through the unreality of words and the emptiness of verbal teachings. Once the principles are understood, even the words that express them can be set aside. The sage therefore does not linger over or accumulate verbal teachings. This is what is meant by “the sage does not accumulate.”

The more the sage gives to others, the more he has; the more he gives to others, the more he gains.

“More” here means completely or in full. Although the sage does not cling to verbal teachings, ordinary people still need the sage’s guidance to awaken their wisdom. The sage therefore passes on the principles of clarity and stillness in full to ordinary, ignorant people. His wisdom and understanding do not diminish as a result; hence, by giving to others, he becomes more fulfilled himself.

The commentary says: “Has” refers to one’s innate nature, the nature one possesses from the beginning; “gains” refers to the benefit acquired through teaching from outside oneself. The nature that understands the principles is not obtained from someone else, so it is called “innate nature.” The help that comes from teaching does not arise from within oneself, so it is called “external benefit.” The sage teaches ordinary, ignorant people, making their minds clearer and wiser; hence, “the more he has.” Learning and teaching strengthen each other, and the principles thus become deeper and clearer; hence, “the more he gains.” Here, “teaching and learning each make up half” means that teaching and learning bring about one another’s fulfillment.

The Way of Heaven benefits and does not harm.

The Way of Heaven nourishes all things and enables them to grow: this is “benefit.” It does not rule over or cut down all things: this is “does not harm.” The Way of Heaven serves here as a comparison, showing that the sage’s Way can widely benefit everyone.

The sage’s Way acts and does not contend.

The sage follows the Dao in action, yet does not compete with all things for what they possess. This is because the sage does not linger over or accumulate anything. By giving the principles to others, the sage becomes more fulfilled, and so does not contend with anyone.

End of juan ten of The Imperial Commentary on the Dao De Jing by Emperor Xuanzong of Tang.

十竟

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 3