中文 · EN

《老子翼(焦竑)》Vol. 2

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 Vol. 2 / 3 25,000 characters

About this page. The original text of 《老子翼(焦竑)》 Vol. 2 (Taixuan 太玄部, 3 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 57 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《老子翼(焦竑)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

言道之大常也。介甫云:言道之主,故曰万物将自宾。言道之变,故曰万物将自化。作,动也。镇者,道之大常也。介甫云:言道之主,故曰万物将自宾。言道之变,故曰万物将自化。作,动也。镇者,压定之使不动也。罗什曰:心得一空,资用不失。万神从化,伏邪归正。 苏注:道常者,无所不为而无为之之意耳。圣人以无为化物,万物化之,始于无为而渐至于作,譬如婴儿之长,人伪日起。故三代之衰,人情之变,日以滋甚,方其欲作,而上之人与天下皆靡,故其变至有不可胜言者。苟其方作而不为之动,终以无名之朴镇之,庶几可得而止也。圣人中无抱朴之念,外无抱朴之迹,故朴全而用大。苟欲朴之心尚存于胸中,则失之远矣。
Interpretation

This passage concerns the constant principle of the Dao. Wang Anshi says: "Speaking of the root of the Dao, it is said that the myriad things will naturally submit to it. Speaking of its transformations, it is said that the myriad things will naturally change." Here "zuo" (to arise, to set in motion) means something beginning to stir, and "zhen" (to press down, to settle) means holding it steady so that it no longer moves.

Kumarajiva says: when the mind reaches emptiness and stillness, one's daily needs are not lost. The myriad spirits change accordingly, and evil also returns to rectitude.

Su Shi explains that "the constant Dao" means the Dao accomplishes everything yet does not deliberately act. The sage transforms the myriad things through Wuwei (non-action), and at first the myriad things also accord with Wuwei. Later they gradually develop contrivance, just as an infant grows up and human cleverness and artifice steadily increase. When the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties declined, changes in human feeling grew ever more severe. When the people first began to contrive, rulers and everyone under heaven moved along with them, so that changes arose endlessly and could not be fully described. If the sage is not moved when things are about to rise, and ultimately uses the nameless, formless "pu" (uncarved block, natural original nature) to settle them, then perhaps they can be brought to rest.

The sage has no thought within of deliberately embracing simplicity, and no outward show of deliberately displaying it. Therefore simplicity remains whole, and its function becomes vast. If one still harbors the thought "I must hold on to simplicity," one has already strayed very far from the Dao.

老子翼卷之二不为之动,终以无名之朴镇之,庶几可得而止也。圣人中无抱朴之念,外无抱朴之迹,故朴全而用大。苟欲朴之心尚存于胸中,则失之远矣。 老子翼卷之二竟 1此卷重复《德经》第三十八章至第五十七章以及《道经》第二十二章至第二十六章,现据万历本删。 2世法:『法』字原脱,据万历本补。 3其:原作『典』,据万历本改。 4兆:原作『彼』,据万历本改。 5乃:原作『非』,据万历本改。 6道:原作『若』,据万历本改。 7可名:原作『拘泥』,据万历本改。 老子翼卷之三 下篇 上德不德,是以有德;下德不失德,是以无德。上德无为而无以为,下德为之而有以为。上仁为之而无以为,上义为之而有以为。上礼为之而莫之应,则攘臂以有德;下德不失德,是以无德。上德无为而无以为,下德为之而有以为。上仁为之而无以为,上义为之而有以为。上礼为之而莫之应,则攘臂而仍之。故失道而后德,失德而后仁,失仁而后义,失义而后礼。夫礼者,忠信之薄而乱之首也。前识者,道之华而愚之始也。是以大丈夫处其厚不处其薄,居其实不居其华,故去彼取此。
Interpretation

Superior De (Virtue/Power, de) does not deliberately display its own virtue, and so it truly possesses De. Inferior De is always anxious not to lose the reputation for De, and so it does not truly possess it. Superior De acts naturally and does not set out to accomplish anything. Inferior De takes action because it holds a clear purpose in mind.

Superior benevolence (ren) acts, but not in order to reach some goal. Superior righteousness (yi) also acts, but it carries a deliberate intention. When ritual propriety (li) comes into play and others do not respond, its practitioners roll up their sleeves and forcibly demand compliance. Li refers to the external norms of ritual observance.

Thus, only after the Dao (the Way) is lost does one speak of De; only after De is lost does one speak of ren; only after ren is lost does one speak of yi; and only after yi is lost does one speak of li. Li is the sign that loyalty and trustworthiness have thinned, and it is also the beginning of disorder. What is called "foreknowledge" (qianshi) is the display of one's insight in advance and the pursuit of superficial cleverness. It is merely the flowery surface of the Dao, and it is the beginning of folly.

Therefore, the great person establishes themselves on solid sincerity and does not dwell in shallowness. They value inner truth and do not chase outward ornament. They discard the latter and choose the former.

苏注:圣人从心所欲不踰矩,非有意于德而德自足。其下知德之贵,勉强以求不失,盖仅自完耳,而何德之有?无为而有以为之,则犹有为也。唯无为而无以为者,可谓无为矣。其下非为不成,然犹有以为之,非徒作而无术者也。仁义皆不免于为之矣,其所以异者,仁以无以为为胜,义以有以为为功耳。德有上下,而仁义有上无下,何也?下免于为之矣,其所以异者,仁以无以为为胜,义以有以为为功耳。德有上下,而仁义有上无下,何也?下德在仁义之间,而化义之下者不足复言故也。自德以降而至于礼,圣人之所以齐民者,极矣。故为之而不应,则至于攘臂而强之,强之而又不应,于是刑罚兴而兵甲起,则徒作而无术矣。忠信而无礼,则忠信不见,礼立而忠信之美发越于外。君臣父子之间,夫妇朋友之际,其外灿然而中无余矣。故顺之则治,违之则乱,治乱之相去,其间不能以发,故曰乱之首也。圣人玄览万物,是非得失毕陈于前,如鉴之照形,无所不见,而孰为前后?世人视止于目,听止于耳,思止于心,冥行万物,是非得失毕陈于前,如鉴之照形,无所不见,而孰为前后?世人视止于目,听止于耳,思止于心,冥行于万物之间,役智以求识,而偶有见焉,虽自以为明,而不知至愚之自始也。世之鄙夫,乐其有得于下而忘其上,故喜薄而遗厚,采华而弃实,非大丈夫,孰能去彼取此?
Interpretation

The sage acts in accord with an original heart-mind, yet does not overstep the standards that ought to be kept. They do not deliberately pursue De (Virtue), but their De is naturally abundant. Those on a lower level recognize the importance of De and strive to maintain their conduct, but they merely preserve themselves with effort. How could they be said to truly possess De?

If one appears to practice wuwei (non-action) outwardly while inwardly intending to accomplish something, it still counts as youwei (purposive action). Only one who both refrains from acting and harbors no deliberate aim may be called truly non-acting. Those on a still lower level believe nothing can be accomplished without action, yet they act with purpose; they are not without means or acting at random. Ren (benevolence) and yi (righteousness) also cannot avoid some form of doing. The difference is that ren prizes action that is not contrived, while yi takes deliberate application as its merit.

De has higher and lower grades, yet ren and yi have only higher levels and no lower ones. Why is this? A lesser De lies between ren and yi, and the declines below yi are no longer worth discussing.

From De down to li (the ritual system that regulates conduct) is the limit of what the sage can employ to govern the people. If the promotion of ritual norms still meets no response, it escalates to rolling up one's sleeves and forcing the people to comply. If coercion still fails, punishments and warfare arise. This is merely forceful action without any proper means.

When people have loyal and sincere hearts but no li, their loyalty and sincerity cannot manifest. Once ritual institutions are established, the virtue of loyalty and sincerity can fully reveal itself. Between ruler and minister, father and son, husband and wife, and friends, outward ritual forms may be clearly displayed while the inner heart holds little real substance. Therefore, compliance with ritual norms brings stability, and violating them brings disorder. The distance between order and chaos is extremely small, so it is said that li is the beginning of disorder.

The sage observes all things with a deep and clear mind, what the text calls xuanlan (profound, quiet observation). Right and wrong, gain and loss all appear before the eyes, like a mirror reflecting form, seeing everything without exception. Why would such a mind need to distinguish before and after? Ordinary people, however, are bound by their eyes, ears, and thoughts. They grope blindly among things and exhaust their minds seeking knowledge. Occasionally they make a discovery and consider themselves clear-sighted, not realizing that from the very beginning they have been dwelling in ignorance.

Shallow worldly people are content with obtaining lesser things and forget the higher realm. Therefore they love the superficial and abandon the profound, pluck the flowers and lose the root. Without the spirit of a true great person, who could abandon these outward appearances and turn toward what truly matters?

笔乘:首乱始愚,极言礼智流弊所至耳。庄子举老子此言而论之曰:今己为物也,欲复归根,不亦难乎?其易也,其惟大人乎?虽然既归其根,孰为物?孰为非物?故又曰:匿而不可不为者,事也。远而不可不居者,义也。亲而不可不广者,仁也。节而不可不积者,礼也。中而不可不高者,德也。一而不可不易者,道也。此数者,虽有上下先后之异,而以圣人用之,皆道也。盖圣人百虑同归,二际俱泯,岂复有彼此去取邪。虽有上下先后之异,而以圣人用之,皆道也。盖圣人百虑同归,二际俱泯,岂复有彼此去取邪。 昔之得一者:天得一以清,地得一以宁,神得一以灵,谷得一以盈,万物得一以生,侯王得一以为天下贞。其致之一也,天无以清将恐裂,地无以宁将恐发,神无以灵将恐歇,谷无以盈将恐竭,万物无以生将恐灭,侯王无以贞而贵高将恐蹶。故贵以贱为本,高以下为基。是以侯王自谓孤寡不谷,此其以贱为本邪,非乎?故致数舆无舆,不欲碌碌如玉,落落如石。 裂,破毁也。发,发泄也。歇,消灭也。竭,枯竭也。蹶音厥,颠仆也。数,上声。 苏注:一,道也。物之所以得为物者,皆道也。天下之人,见物而忘道。天知其清而已,地知其宁而已,神知其。
Interpretation

"Shou luan shi yu" (the first disorder begins with foolishness) is a strong statement of the harm that comes when ritual propriety (li) and knowledge (zhi) are pushed to their extremes. Zhuangzi quotes this line from Laozi to ask: now that people have become part of the many external things around them, is it not very difficult to return to the root? Perhaps only the great person (daren), one of lofty virtue who can fully penetrate the Dao, would find it easy to do so. Yet once one has returned to the root, who counts as an external thing, and who does not?

For this reason it is also said: that which must be dealt with even while one remains hidden is affairs (shi); that which must be dealt with even while one stands apart from others is righteousness (yi); that which keeps widening one's care even while one draws close to others is benevolence (ren); that which must keep accumulating practice even while one exercises restraint is ritual propriety (li); that which must keep rising even while one abides in the center is De (Virtue); that which returns to oneness yet cannot hold fast to any fixed form is the Dao. Although these differ in rank and sequence, when the sage (shengren) makes use of them, all can be brought back to the Dao. The sage's thoughts may be many, yet they reach the same destination by different paths. Opposing extremes are also dissolved, so how could the sage still cling to distinguishing and choosing?

In antiquity, those who attained "One," the fundamental principle of the Dao, were such that Heaven became clear, Earth became stable, Shen (spirit) became efficacious, the valleys became full, the myriad things grew, and the lords and kings became the rightful rulers of the realm. They could be thus because they had obtained "One." If Heaven could not be clear, it would likely crack; if Earth could not be stable, it would likely quake; if Shen could not be efficacious, it would likely perish; if the valleys could not be full, they would likely run dry; if the myriad things could not grow, they would likely be extinguished; if the lords and kings could not hold to what is correct and instead dwelt in exalted position, they would likely topple.

Therefore, nobility takes the lowly as its root, and high station takes the humble as its foundation. When the lords and kings call themselves "gu" ("orphan"), "gua" ("solitary one"), and "bu gu" (meaning one who lacks virtue and is not good), are they not taking lowliness as their root? Is this not so? Thus, even piling up many carts cannot produce a true cart, because the whole cannot simply be equated with the sum of its parts. One should not cling to being showy and precious like fine jade, nor deliberately pose as lofty and hard like stone.

The commentary explains: "lie" means to break apart and ruin; "fa" means to burst forth or stir up; "xie" means to perish; "jie" means to be exhausted; "jue" means to stumble or fall over. "Shu" is read in the third tone and means to count or add up.

Su's commentary says: "One" is the Dao. The reason the myriad things can become what they are is that they possess the Dao, yet people of the world see only concrete things and forget the Dao on which those things depend. Heaven knows only that it is clear, Earth knows only that it is stable, Shen knows only that it...

苏注:一,道也。物之所以得为物者,皆道也。天下之人,见物而忘道。天知其清而已,地知其宁而已,神知其灵而已,谷知其盈而已,万物知其生而已,侯王知其为天下贞而已。不知其所以得此者,皆道存焉耳。致之言极也。天不得一未遽裂也,地不得一未遽发也,神不得一未遽歇也,万物不得一未遽灭也,侯王不得一未遽蹶也,然其极必至此耳。天地之大,侯王之贵,皆一之致。夫一果何物也?视之不见,执之不得,则亦天地之至微也,此所谓贱且下也,本也。昔之称孤寡不谷者,亦举其本而之不见,执之不得,则亦天地之至微也,此所谓贱且下也,本也。昔之称孤寡不谷者,亦举其本而遗其末耳。轮、辐、盖、轸、衡、轭、毂、轊,会而为车,物物可数而车不可数,然后知无有之为车,所谓无之以为用者也。然则天地将以大为天地邪?侯王将以贵为侯王邪?大与贵之中,有一存焉,此其所以为天地侯王者,而人莫或知之耳。故一处贵而非贵,处贱1而非贱。非若玉之碌碌,贵而不能贱;石之落落,贱而不能贵也。 反者道之动,弱者道之用。天下之物生於有,有生于无。 反,复也。烦汉云:反者动之,极则必归也。是其反也,正以其动也,非动无反。
Interpretation

Su Zhe's commentary says: "One" is the Dao. The reason all things can be the things they are is that they have the Dao. People in the world see the myriad things but forget the Dao within them. Heaven knows only that it is clear, Earth knows only that it is stable, spirit knows only that it is efficacious, the valleys know only that they are full, the myriad things know only that they grow, and the lords and kings know only that they are the masters of all under heaven, yet they do not know that what causes them to obtain these qualities is the Dao.

"Zhi" (to reach the utmost) means to reach the limit. If heaven loses the One, it will eventually crack; if Earth loses the One, it will eventually tremble; if spirit loses the One, it will eventually lose its efficacy; if the myriad things lose the One, they will eventually perish; if the lords and kings lose the One, they will eventually be ruined. That heaven and earth are vast and that the lords and kings are noble are both results of the One being carried to its utmost.

So what, then, is the One? It cannot be seen or grasped, and therefore it is the most subtle and fine existence between heaven and earth. This is what is meant by "low and humble," and yet it is the root of the myriad things. The ancients called themselves "orphan," "lonely one," and "I who lack virtue" (terms rulers used when speaking humbly of themselves). This too is a way of pointing to one's root and setting aside outward nobility.

A cart is assembled from the wheel, spokes, canopy, rim, crossbar, yoke, hub, and the ends of the axle. Each part can be counted one by one, yet the whole cart cannot be equated with any single part. From this we understand that the cart's function arises from the whole formed by its parts, and also from the invisible, intangible emptiness within them. This is the principle by which "non-being" (wu) is able to function.

Do heaven and earth become heaven and earth merely through their vastness? Do the lords and kings become lords and kings merely through their nobility? Within vastness and nobility alike there is the One. This is the root by which heaven and earth and the lords and kings are established, though people often fail to notice it. Therefore the One dwells within nobility yet does not regard nobility as noble; when it dwells in lowliness, it is not made base by it. It is unlike jade, which can appear precious but cannot appear base, nor like stone, which can appear base but cannot appear precious.

"Return" (fan) is the way the Dao moves, and "weakness" (ruo) is the way the Dao exerts its function. The myriad things are born from "being" (you), and "being" is born from "non-being" (wu).

"Return" carries the sense of coming back and cycling. Huan Han said: "What is called 'return' means that when things reach the extreme of their movement, they inevitably turn back." That is to say, only because things are in motion does return occur; without motion, there is no such thing as return.

苏注:复性则静矣,然其寂然不动,感而遂通天下之故,则动之所自起也。道无形无声,天下之弱者莫如道,然而天下之至强莫加焉,此其所以能用万物也。世不知静之为动,弱之为强,故告之以物之所自生者。盖自起也。道无形无声,天下之弱者莫如道,然而天下之至强莫加焉,此其所以能用万物也。世不知静之为动,弱之为强,故告之以物之所自生者。盖天下之物,闻有母制子,未闻2有以子制母者也。 笔乘:天下之物生于有,所谓有名万物之母是已。有生于无,所谓无名天地之始是已。无必生有,是故贵其反。反者,反於无也。有生於无,是故贵其弱。弱者,无之似也。 上士闻道,勤而行之;中士闻道,若存若亡;下士闻道,大笑之。不笑不足以为道。故建言有之;明道若昧,进道若退,夷道若类,上德若谷,大白若辱,广德若不足,建德若偷,质真若渝,大方无隅,大器晚成,大音希声;明道若昧,进道若退,夷道若类,上德若谷,大白若辱,广德若不足,建德若偷,质真若渝,大方无隅,大器晚成,大音希声,大象无形,道隐无名。夫唯道,善贷且成。
Interpretation

Su Shi's commentary says: when one restores one's original nature, the mind becomes quiet. Yet although the mind is still and does not move, once it receives a stimulus it can comprehend the principles of all things under heaven. This is also the root from which action arises. The Dao (the Way) has no shape and no sound, and it is the most yielding thing under heaven. Yet nothing under heaven is stronger than the Dao, and therefore the Dao is able to make use of the myriad things. Worldly people do not understand that movement is contained within stillness and that strength is contained within softness, so one must tell them the source from which the myriad things arise. Among all things under heaven, we have heard of a mother governing her son, but we have never heard of a son governing his mother.

The Bi Cheng (Notes from the Brush) says: the myriad things under heaven arise from Being (you), and this is what is meant by "Named, it is the mother of the myriad things." Being in turn arises from Non-being (wu), and this is what is meant by "Nameless, it is the beginning of heaven and earth." Non-being necessarily gives rise to Being, and so what is precious is returning to Non-being. What is called "returning" is precisely going back to Non-being. Being arises out of Non-being, and so what is precious is yielding, for yielding resembles Non-being.

Those of the highest capacity, on hearing the Dao, diligently put it into practice. Those of middling capacity, on hearing the Dao, seem to remember it and seem to forget it. Those of the lowest capacity, on hearing the Dao, burst out laughing. If the Dao were not laughed at, it would not be enough to be the Dao. Therefore the ancients who established teachings said: the bright Dao appears dim, the advancing Dao appears to recede, and the level Dao appears uneven. The highest De (Virtue/Power) appears as empty as a valley, great whiteness appears to have stains, and abundant De seems insufficient. Vigorous De appears lax, and genuine substance appears to be changing. The greatest squareness has no corners, the greatest vessel is completed last, and the greatest sound is heard as faint. The greatest image has no form; the Dao is hidden and unmanifest, and has no fixed name. Only the Dao is skilled at bestowing on the myriad things and bringing them to completion.

建,立也。偷,苟且也。渝,羊朱反,变改也。傅奕《音义》云:古本作输。《广雅》曰:输,愚也。或作揄,董遇作摇,今从王弼傅奕作渝。应人之乏而终以见还曰贷。赵志坚云:贷者,暂借非长与也。且者,权成非久固也。欲使蒙贷者不长往,得成者非久住,感贷荷成,速归於道。
Interpretation

Jian means to establish or to accomplish. Tou means to get by carelessly or to make do under compulsion. Yu, read as yang zhu fan, means to change. Fu Yi's Yinyi (Phonetic and Semantic Glosses) notes that an older edition wrote this character as shu, and the Guangya glosses shu as ignorance. Some editions write it as yu, and Dong Yu's edition writes it as yao. Here the text follows the Wang Bi and Fu Yi editions and adopts the character yu.

Help given to others in an emergency, which is later reclaimed, is called dai (lending). Zhao Zhijian says that dai means lending for a time rather than giving on a permanent basis, and that qie (expediency) means accomplishing something by temporary means rather than establishing it firmly and permanently. The purpose of this is that the one who receives help should not depend on borrowing over the long term, and that what has been accomplished should not linger indefinitely. Having been aided and having taken up what has been accomplished, people should be moved to return to the Dao (the Way) as quickly as possible.

Su's commentary says: "The Dao has no form, so it cannot be seen; it has no sound, so it cannot be heard."

苏注:道非形,不可见;非声,不可闻。,暂借非长与也。且者,权成非久固也。欲使蒙贷者不长往,得成者非久住,感贷荷成,速归於道。 苏注:道非形,不可见;非声,不可闻。不先知万物之妄,廓然无蔽,卓然有见,未免于不信也。故下士闻道,以为荒唐谬悠而笑之。中士闻道,与之存亡出没而疑之。惟了然见之者,然后勤行服膺而不怠。孔子曰:语之而不惰者,其回也与?斯所谓上士也哉。建,立也。古之立言者有是说,而老子取之,下之所陈者是也。无所不照,而非察也。若止不行,而天下之速者莫之或先也。或夷或类,所至则平,而未尝削也。上德不德,如谷之虚也。大白若辱者,使白而不受污,此则不屑不洁之士,而非圣人也。广德若不足者,广大而不可复加,则止于此而已,非广也。建德若偷,因物之自然而无立者,外若偷惰而实建也。质真若渝,体圣抱神,随物变化而不失其贞者,外若渝也也。建德若偷,因物之自然而无立者,外若偷惰而实建也。质真若渝,体圣抱神,随物变化而不失其贞者,外若渝也。大方无隅,全其大方,不小立圭角也。大器晚成,器大不可近用也。大音希声,非耳之所得闻也。大象无形,非目之所得见也。道之所寓,无所不见,凡此十二者,皆道之见于事者也。而道之大全则隐于无名,惟其所寓,惟其有余,以贷不足,物之赖之以成者如此。
Interpretation

Su Shi's commentary says: Dao (the Way) has no form, so it cannot be seen, and no sound, so it cannot be heard. If one does not first understand that all things are illusory, and so attain an open mind with nothing to obscure it, so that one truly perceives that Dao exists, one will inevitably still harbor doubt.

Thus, when inferior scholars hear of Dao, they find it absurd and remote and laugh at it. Middling scholars hear of it and alternately believe and doubt, their attitude wavering. Only those who truly understand Dao practice it diligently, keep it in mind, and do not slacken. Confucius said: "When the principle is explained to them and they still do not slacken, perhaps only Yan Hui could manage this?" Such people are what is called superior scholars.

"Jian (to establish)" means to set up. Ancient writers who established teachings had this saying, which Laozi quoted, and what follows lists these sayings.

Dao illuminates everything, yet it does not deliberately scrutinize. Dao appears still and does not rush forward, yet nothing is faster than it. It gently accords with the myriad things, so wherever it reaches, things naturally become level and upright, and it never corrects them by cutting or trimming.

"Shang de bu de" (the highest De, or Virtue/Power, does not regard itself as De) means that the highest De does not think itself virtuous, and is empty-hearted like a valley. "Da bai ruo ru" (great whiteness seems soiled) means that true great whiteness looks as if it has been stained. If one single-mindedly pursues purity and refuses to be touched by dust, that is merely the conduct of aloof and isolated scholars, not the Way of the sage. "Guang de ruo bu zu" (broad De seems insufficient) means that if one thinks one's virtue has reached a breadth beyond which nothing more is possible, one stops at the level already attained, and so is not truly broad. "Jian de ruo tou" (established De seems furtive) means that one accords with the natural state of things and does not deliberately set up deeds. Outwardly it seems slack, but inwardly one's De is firm. "Zhi zhen ruo yu" (genuine substance seems to change) means that inwardly one keeps the sage's realm of embodying Dao and accords with the transformations of things without losing one's genuineness, though outwardly it appears as if one has changed.

"Da fang wu yu" (the greatest square has no corners) means that a truly vast square has no sharp edges and does not deliberately display small points. "Da qi wan cheng" (the great vessel is completed late) means that the vessel of Dao is vast and cannot be used for small immediate purposes. "Da yin xi sheng" (the greatest sound is faint) means that the greatest sound cannot be heard by the ears, and "da xiang wu xing" (the greatest image has no shape) means that the greatest image cannot be seen by the eyes.

Dao dwells within all things and is present everywhere. The twelve sayings above are all manifestations of Dao in particular things, but complete Dao itself remains hidden in namelessness. Dao accords with the needs of the myriad things and supplements their lack with its own surplus, and things are accomplished by relying on it.

笔乘:上士者,恬淡寂寞虚无无为者也。勤於此,则勤行之至而实无所勤行也,斯所谓天然悬解矣,而下士恶足以知之。君平曰:中士所闻,非至美也,下士所见,非至善也。中士所眩,下士所笑,乃美善之美善者也。 道生一,一生二,二生三,三士所见,非至善也。中士所眩,下士所笑,乃美善之美善者也。 道生一,一生二,二生三,三生万物。万物负阴而抱阳,冲气以为和。人之所恶,惟孤寡不谷,而王公以为称。故物或损之而益,或益之而损。人之所教,我亦教之。强梁者不得其死,吾将以为教父。 凡动物背止於后,阴静也;耳目口鼻居前,阳动也,故曰负阴抱阳。植物则背寒向暖,而冲气运乎其间。木绝水曰梁,木负栋亦曰梁,取其力之强也,故曰强梁。《金人铭》曰:强梁者不得其死,好胜者必遇其敌。盖古人尝以此为教,而我亦教之。但老子独尊之曰教父,如言万物之母之谓。母主养,父主教,故言生则曰母,死,好胜者必遇其敌。盖古人尝以此为教,而我亦教之。但老子独尊之曰教父,如言万物之母之谓。母主养,父主教,故言生则曰母,言教则曰父。

No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.

苏注:夫道非一非二,及其与物为偶,道一而物不一,故以一名道,然而道则非一也。一与一为二,二与一为三,自是以往而万物生。物虽有万不同,而莫不负阴抱阳,冲气以为和者,盖物生于三而三生于一,理之自然也。世之人不知万物之所自生,莫不贱寡小而贵重大。然王公之尊,而自称孤寡不谷,古之达者,盖已知之矣。 天下之至柔,驰骋天下之至坚。无有入於无间,吾是以知无为之有益。不言之教,无为之益,天下希及之。 驰骋,役使也。坚犹刚强,不曰刚强而曰坚矣。 天下之至柔,驰骋天下之至坚。无有入於无间,吾是以知无为之有益。不言之教,无为之益,天下希及之。 驰骋,役使也。坚犹刚强,不曰刚强而曰坚,变文叶韵也。无间,无内也。至刚者,天下莫能胜而至柔能役之。无内者,天下莫能破而无有能入之。二语皆设喻以明无为之有益也。 苏注:以坚御坚,不折则碎。以柔御坚,柔亦不靡,坚亦不病,求之於物,则水是也。以有入有,捍不相受。以无入有,无未尝劳,有未尝觉。求之于物,则鬼神是也。是以圣人唯能无为,故能役使众强,出入群有。 名与身孰亲?身与货孰多?得与亡孰病?是故甚爱必大费,多藏必厚亡。知足不辱,知止不殆,可以长久。
Interpretation

The Dao (the Way) itself is neither one nor two. Yet when it stands in relation to the myriad things, it may be called "One" (yi), while the myriad things each differ. Thus "One" is used to name the Dao, but the Dao itself is not merely a particular "one." When "one" stands against "one," they become "two"; adding another "one" yields "three," and from there the myriad things are endlessly produced. Though the myriad things differ greatly, they all turn their backs on Yin and face toward Yang, and the Yin and Yang Qi (vital energy) blend and reach harmony. This is because the myriad things arise from "three," and "three" arises from "one," which is the natural principle. Ordinary people do not know where the myriad things come from, so they tend to look down on what is few and small and to honor what is many and great. Yet the wanggong guiren (kings, dukes, and nobles) call themselves "gu" (orphan), "gua" (lonely one), and "bu gu" (one whose virtue is insufficient, a term of humility). This shows that the ancient people of penetrating understanding had long grasped this principle.

The softest thing under heaven can ride roaming over the hardest thing under heaven, and what has no form or substance can enter where there is no gap. From this I know that Wuwei (non-action, acting in accordance with nature without forcing) is beneficial. Teaching without words, and the benefits of Wuwei, are rarely achieved by people in the world.

Here, "chicheng" (galloping freely) means to control and command. "Jian" (hard, firm) is close in meaning to "gangqiang" (strong and unyielding), and the word "jian" was chosen deliberately to vary the wording and harmonize the rhythm. "Wujian" (without gaps) means having no gap and no inner space. These two sentences use metaphor to illustrate the benefits of Wuwei. Nothing under heaven surpasses the hardest thing, yet the utmost softness can control it. Nothing under heaven can split what has no gap, yet the formless can enter it.

Su Shi's commentary says: to meet hardness with hardness leads either to breaking or to shattering, while to meet hardness with softness means the soft thing is not worn down and the hard thing is not harmed. Among natural things, water has this quality. When a material object enters another material object, the two conflict and cannot merge. When a formless thing enters a material object, the formless side expends no effort and the material side does not perceive it. Among natural things, the guishen (spirits and ghosts) work in this way. Therefore, when the sage is able to practice Wuwei, they can master all mighty forces and move freely in and out among the myriad things.

Which is closer to us, fame or life? Which is more precious, life or wealth? Which is more harmful, gaining or losing? Excessive craving will certainly incur a great cost, and hoarding too much will certainly bring heavy losses. Those who know contentment will not be humiliated, and those who know when to stop will not fall into danger. In this way, they can endure long.

多犹重也。薛云:知足者,乐今有之已多,无求者也,无求奚辱?知止者,惧后进之有损,知几者也,知几奚殆? 大成若缺,其用不敝 多犹重也。薛云:知足者,乐今有之已多,无求者也,无求奚辱?知止者,惧后进之有损,知几者也,知几奚殆? 大成若缺,其用不敝。大盈若冲,其用不穷。大直若屈,大巧若拙,大辩若讷。躁胜寒,静胜热,清静为天下正。 苏注:天下以不缺为成,故成必有敝。以不虚为盈,故盈必有穷。圣人要于大成而不恤其缺,期于大盈而不恶其冲,是以成而不敝,盈而不穷也。直而不屈,其直必折,循理而行,虽曲而直。巧而不拙,其巧必劳,付物自然,虽拙而巧。辩而不讷,其辩必穷,因理而言,虽讷而辩。成而不缺,盈而不冲,直而不屈,巧而不拙,辩而不讷,譬如躁之不能静,静之不能躁耳。夫躁能胜寒而不能胜热,静能胜热而不能胜寒,皆滞于一偏,而非其正也。唯泊然清净,不染于一,非成非缺,非盈非冲,非直非屈能胜寒而不能胜热,静能胜热而不能胜寒,皆滞于一偏,而非其正也。唯泊然清净,不染于一,非成非缺,非盈非冲,非直非屈,非巧非拙,非辩非讷,而后无所不胜,可以为天下正矣。
Interpretation

"Knowing contentment" means being satisfied with what one already has and seeking nothing more. Since one seeks nothing, what could there be to be humiliated by? "Knowing when to stop" means understanding that advancement should stop at the appropriate point, and recognizing the signs of change in things, so that one does not bring harm by pressing on recklessly. If one understands these things, what danger could there be?

The greatest accomplishment may seem to be lacking, yet its function never wears out. The greatest fullness may seem empty, yet its function is never exhausted. The most upright figure may seem somewhat bent, the most skillful craft may appear clumsy, and the most eloquent speaker may seem inarticulate. Restlessness can overcome cold, and stillness can overcome heat. Clear stillness and non-action (wúwéi, Wuwei), this is the correct Way (dào, Dao) of the world.

Su Shi's commentary says: People regard the absence of any flaw as accomplishment, and so such accomplishment often decays. They regard the absence of any emptiness as fullness, and so such fullness will eventually be drained. The sage pursues great accomplishment without minding that it seems to have flaws, and pursues great fullness without rejecting the appearance of emptiness. Therefore accomplishment does not decay, and fullness is never exhausted.

To pursue straightness single-mindedly is to risk breaking; to follow the principles of things is to remain upright even when one appears crooked. To pursue skill single-mindedly is to wear oneself out; to let things follow their natural course is to reveal skill even when one appears clumsy. To argue relentlessly may end in having no words left; to speak according to the principles of things is to make one's meaning clear even when one seems not to speak well.

If one clings to completeness and refuses any flaw, to fullness and refuses any emptiness, to straightness and refuses any bend, to skill and refuses any clumsiness, or to eloquence and refuses any hesitation, this is like knowing only restlessness or only stillness: both are fixation on a single extreme. Restlessness can resist cold but cannot dispel heat; stillness can dispel heat but cannot resist cold. Each has its limits. Only when the mind is calm and tranquil, unattached to any one extreme, and not clinging to completeness or flaw, fullness or emptiness, straightness or bending, skill or clumsiness, eloquence or silence, can one respond to every situation and become the correct Way of the world.

天下有道,却走马以粪,天下无道,戎马生于郊。罪莫大于可欲,祸莫大于不知足,咎莫大于欲得。故知足之足,常足矣。 却,屏去也。粪,粪田也。吴幼清本粪下有车字,以张衡《东京赋》却走马以粪车为证。戎3马,战马也。郊4,交也,二国相交之境也。戎马生于郊,言兵久不还也。一性之内,无欠无余,人能安之,无往不足,故曰知足之足,常足。 苏注:天下各安其分,则不争而自治,故却是马而粪田。以其可余,人能安之,无往不足,故曰知足之足,常足。 苏注:天下各安其分,则不争而自治,故却是马而粪田。以其可欲者示人,固有罪矣,而不足其足者,其祸又甚。所欲必得者,其咎最大。匹夫有一于身,患必及之。侯王而为是,则戎马之所自起也。唯知足者,所寓而足,故无不足。 不出户,知天下;不窥牖,见天道。其出弥远,其知弥少。是以圣人不行而知,不见而名,不为而成。
Interpretation

When the world is clear and orderly and the Dao (dào) prevails, warhorses can be retired and put to plowing the fields. When the world is in disorder and the Dao is absent, warhorses breed on the borderlands where battles are fought, showing that warfare never ends.

Nothing brings transgression more readily than objects that stir desire, nothing brings calamity more readily than failing to know contentment, and nothing brings fault more readily than constantly seeking to obtain more. Therefore, one who knows contentment is the one who is often content.

Here, "què" means to withdraw or set aside, and "fèn" refers to using the land for tilling. "Róngmǎ" means warhorses, and "jiāo" refers to the border zone between two states. Warhorses appearing in the outlying borderlands signifies that military conflict has continued for a long time without cease. Human nature originally lacks nothing and needs no addition; if one can rest in this, one will find satisfaction everywhere. Su Shì (Su Shi) comments that when all people within the realm keep to their proper stations, they do not contend, and governance proceeds naturally, so warhorses can be retired to till the fields. To display enticing objects before people is already to invite transgression; to desire without knowing contentment brings greater calamity; to insist on obtaining what one wants brings the greatest fault. When ordinary people act this way, misfortune arrives, and when feudal lords and rulers act this way, warfare arises from it. Only one who knows contentment is self-sufficient wherever they dwell.

One who does not leave the household can know the principles of the world, and one who does not peer out through the window can understand the Dao of Heaven (tiāndào). The farther one travels, the less one knows. Therefore the sage (shèngrén) knows without going out, discerns things without looking at them, and accomplishes without acting deliberately.

苏注:性之为体,充遍宇宙,无远近古今之异。古之圣人,其所以不出户牖而无所不知者,特其性全故耳。世之人为物所蔽,性分于耳目,内为身心之所纷乱,外为山河之所障塞,见不出视,闻不出听,户牖之微,能蔽而绝之,不知圣人复性而足,乃欲出而求之,是以弥远而弥少也。性之所及,非特能知能名而已,盖可以因物之自然,不劳而成之矣。 为而求之,是以弥远而弥少也。性之所及,非特能知能名而已,盖可以因物之自然,不劳而成之矣。 为学日益,为道日损。损之又损之,以至于无为。无为而无不为矣。故取天下常以无事,及其有事,不足以取天下5。 取,开元疏云犹摄化也。无事即无为也。无为自化,清静自正,故曰取天下常以无事。为者败之,执者失之,故曰有事不足以取天下。
Interpretation

Su Shi's commentary says that human original nature (benxing) fills the entire cosmos and is not limited by distance or by past and present. The ancient sages could know all things without leaving their doors, simply because their original nature was complete and unobscured. Ordinary people are blinded by external things. Their original nature is confined by the limits of the ears and eyes, and their minds are further disturbed by bodily and mental distractions. Moreover, mountains and rivers separate them, so they cannot see beyond their sight or hear beyond their hearing. Even a small obstruction such as a doorway is enough to block their understanding. People do not realize that the sage needs only to restore original nature, and that this is sufficient. Instead, they go outside to pursue things, so the farther they go, the less they obtain. What original nature can reach is not only knowing things and naming them. It can also accord with the natural state of things and bring affairs to completion without effort.

Deliberately striving to act in pursuit of things leads one to go farther and farther and gain less and less. What original nature can reach is not only knowing and naming things. It can also accord with the natural state of things and bring affairs to completion without effort.

In learning, knowledge increases day by day. In cultivating the Dao (Dao), one must decrease day by day. Keep subtracting, subtract again, until one reaches wuwei (non-action, not forcing and following what is natural). Once one attains wuwei, nothing cannot be accomplished. Therefore, in governing the world, one must always take wushi (no-affairs) as the principle. Once one deliberately acts, it is not enough to govern the world.

The character qu, the commentary of the Kaiyuan era explains, here means shehua, which is to gather and transform, that is, to unify and teach the world. Wushi means wuwei. When non-action is practiced, the world transforms itself naturally. When one is quiet, the world naturally returns to correctness. Therefore it is said that governing the world must always rest on wushi. Reckless action brings ruin, and obstinate grasping brings loss. Therefore it is said that deliberate action is not enough to govern the world.

苏注:不知道而务学,闻见日多,而无以一之,未免为累也。孔子曰:多闻,择其善者而从之。多见而识之,知之次也。苟一日知道,顾视万物,无一非妄,去妄以求复性,是谓之损。孔子谓子贡曰:女以予为多学而识之者与?曰:然,非与?曰:非也,予一以贯之。去妄以求复性,可谓性,是谓之损。孔子谓子贡曰:女以予为多学而识之者与?曰:然,非与?曰:非也,予一以贯之。去妄以求复性,可谓损矣。而去妄之心犹存,及其兼忘此心,纯性而无余,然后无所不为,而不失于无为矣。人皆有欲取天下之心,故造事而求之,心见于外,而物恶之,故终不可得。圣人无为,故无事,其心见于外,而物安之,虽不取天下,而天下归之矣。 圣人无常心,以百姓心为心。善者吾善之,不善者吾亦善之,德善矣。信者吾信之,不信者吾亦信之,德信矣。圣人在天下,惵惵为天下浑其心,百姓皆注其耳目,圣人皆孩之。 无常心,心无所主也。惵,图协反。为,去声。浑,胡本反。
Interpretation

Su Shi's commentary says: those who do not understand the Dao yet pursue learning single-mindedly find that what they hear and see grows greater each day, but without one overarching principle to thread it together, it inevitably becomes a burden. Confucius said, "Hear much, select what is good and follow it; observe much, and record it. This is knowledge of the second order." Once one truly understands the Dao (the Way) and looks back at the myriad things of the world, one finds that none of them is free of illusion. To remove illusion and seek to restore one's original nature is what is called sun (diminishing), that is, subtracting partiality and deluded thoughts.

Confucius said to his disciple Zigong, "Do you think I came to understand the Dao by learning widely and memorizing much?" Zigong replied, "Is it not so?" Confucius said, "No. I penetrate everything with one fundamental principle." Removing illusion and restoring one's original nature may be called diminishing. Yet if the mind still holds the thought "I must remove illusion," one has not fully let go. Only when even this thought is forgotten, so that the original nature shines forth pure and free of miscellaneous thoughts, can one act in every way without violating wuwei (non-action, accord with nature and not forcing things).

Everyone desires to seize the realm, and so they deliberately scheme and strive for it. When such an intention shows outwardly, the myriad things grow averse to the one who holds it, and in the end he cannot obtain the realm. The sage accords with nature and does not act deliberately, so he also does not stir up trouble. His intention is revealed, yet the myriad things are able to rest at ease in accepting him. Though such a person does not seize the realm, the realm turns toward him of its own accord.

The sage has no fixed, unchanging preconceptions. He takes the hearts of the common people as his own heart. Those who are good, he treats well; those who are not good, he also treats well, so that everyone receives good treatment and his De (Virtue/Power) appears rich and sincere. Those who are trustworthy, he trusts; those who are not trustworthy, he also trusts, so that everyone is trusted and good faith is brought to completion. The sage dwells within the realm and is always cautious and anxious about its affairs, causing the minds of the people to return to undivided simplicity. The common people all attentively watch and listen to the sage, yet the sage regards them as children.

"Wu chang xin" (no constant mind) means that there is no fixed opinion held within the heart. The character read as "xie" (xié) here refers to cautious anxiety. "Wei" is read in the departing tone. "Hun" is read as "hu ben qie," meaning to return the mind to undivided simplicity.

In commenting on the line "hun qi xin, bai xing jie zhu qi er mu, sheng ren jie hai zhi" (he makes their minds undivided, the common people all fix their ears and eyes upon him, and the sage treats them all as infants), Su Shi said: "Wu chang xin" means that there is no fixed opinion held within the heart. The character read as "xie" is pronounced xié, "wei" is read in the departing tone, and "hun" is read as "hu ben qie."

苏注下浑其心,百姓皆注其耳目,圣人皆孩之。 无常心,心无所主也。惵,图协反。为,去声。浑,胡本反。 苏注:虚空无形,因万物之形以为形,在方为方,在圆为圆,如使空自有形,则何以形万物哉?是以圣人无心,因百姓之心以为心,无善不善皆善之,无信不信皆信之。善不善在彼,吾之所以善之者,未尝渝也,可谓德善矣。信不信在彼,而吾之所以信者,未尝变也,可谓德信矣。不然,善善而弃不善,信信而弃不信,岂所谓常善救人,故无弃人哉。天下善恶信伪,方各自是以相非相贼,不知所定,圣人忧之,故惵惵为天下浑其心,无善恶,无信伪,皆以一待之。彼方注其耳目,以观圣人之予夺,而吾一以婴儿遇之,于善无所喜,于恶无所嫉。夫是以善者不矜,恶者不愠为天下浑其心,无善恶,无信伪,皆以一待之。彼方注其耳目,以观圣人之予夺,而吾一以婴儿遇之,于善无所喜,于恶无所嫉。夫是以善者不矜,恶者不愠,释然皆化,而天下始定矣。 出生入死,生之徒十有三,死之徒十有三,人之生动之死地者亦十有三。夫何故?以其生生之厚。盖闻善摄生者,陆行不遇兕虎,入军不避甲兵。兕无所投其角,虎无所措其爪,兵无所容其刃。夫何故?以其无死地。
Interpretation

Su Shi's commentary observes that emptiness has no fixed form. It takes on the shape of whatever it contains, becoming square in square things and round in round things. If emptiness had a fixed shape of its own, how could it hold the shapes of all things?

The sage likewise holds no rigid opinions but follows the hearts of the common people, treating their hearts as his own. He treats those who are good and those who are not good with equal kindness, and he trusts those who are trustworthy and those who are not with equal faith. Others may differ in their goodness, but his manner of treating them does not change, and this may be called virtuous goodness (De Shan). Others may differ in their trustworthiness, but his trust does not change, and this may be called virtuous trustworthiness (De Xin). Otherwise, if one favored only the good and abandoned the not-good, or trusted only the trustworthy and withheld trust from everyone else, how could one be said to be ever skilled at saving people and to abandon no one?

People throughout the world judge good and bad, true and false, and in doing so they blame and harm one another, yet they do not know what standard to rely upon. The sage is troubled by this and carefully guides the hearts of the people back to simplicity. He clings neither to good nor to bad, nor to true nor to false, but regards all things equally. People watch closely to see how the sage rewards or punishes, yet he treats them as one would treat infants. He is not especially pleased by good deeds, nor especially repelled by bad ones. Thus those who do good do not boast, and those who do evil do not resent. People gradually let go of their distinctions and are transformed, and so the world finds peace.

Of all who are born and go on to die, about three in ten live long, about three in ten die early, and another three in ten, though they could have lived, move toward death through improper conduct. Why is this? Because they crave and indulge their own lives to excess.

I have heard that one who is skilled at nourishing life does not meet rhinoceroses or tigers when traveling through the mountains and wilds, and does not evade weapons when entering battle. The rhinoceros has nowhere to use its horns, the tiger has nowhere to set its claws, and weapons cannot wound him. Why is this? Because he does not enter the ground of death.

出谓自无而见于有。入谓自有而归于无。《庄子》:万物皆出于机,入于机。又曰:其出不忻,其入不讵。又曰:有乎出,有乎入。皆以出为生,入为死。夫音符。摄生如摄政摄官之摄,不认生为己有,如暂焉管摄之也。不期而会曰遇。兕音似,《山海经》:兕出湘水之南,苍黑色。《尔雅》云:形如。摄生如摄政摄官之摄,不认生为己有,如暂焉管摄之也。不期而会曰遇。兕音似,《山海经》:兕出湘水之南,苍黑色。《尔雅》云:形如野牛,一角,重千斤。
Interpretation

The character chu refers to life emerging from a formless state into visible form, and ru refers to returning from visible form to formlessness. The Zhuangzi says that all things arise from ji, the germinal source, and return to it. It also says that when life departs one does not rejoice, and when it returns one is not alarmed. The saying "there is chu and there is ru" likewise treats chu as birth and ru as death.

In shesheng (nurturing life), the she carries the same sense as in shili zhengwu (temporarily administering government affairs) and sheguan (temporarily holding an office). It means looking after life for a time without treating that life as one's own possession. Yu means meeting by chance, without any prior arrangement.

The character si is pronounced like si, as in the homophone for "resemble." The Classic of Mountains and Seas records that the si is found south of the Xiang River and is dark blue-black in color. The Erya dictionary says it resembles a wild ox, with a single horn on its head, and that it can weigh a thousand jin.

苏注:性无生死,出则为生,入则为死。用物取精以自滋养者,生之徒也。声色臭味以自戕贼者,死之徒也。二者既分生死之道矣。吾又知作而不知休,知言而不知默,知思而不知忘,以趣于尽,则所谓动而之死地者也。生死之道,以十言之,三者各居其三矣,岂非生死之道九,而不生不死之道一而已矣。不生不死则《易》所谓寂然不动者也。老子言其九不言其一,使人自得之,以寄无思无为之妙也。有生则有死,故生之徒即死之徒也。人之所赖于生者厚,则死之道常十九。圣人常在不生不死中,生地且无,焉有一,使人自得之,以寄无思无为之妙也。有生则有死,故生之徒即死之徒也。人之所赖于生者厚,则死之道常十九。圣人常在不生不死中,生地且无,焉有死地哉?
Interpretation

Su Shi's commentary observes that human nature has no division between life and death: when it manifests, it is called life, and when it returns to hidden stillness, it is called death. One who knows how to draw on the essence of external things to nourish the self walks the path of nurturing life, while one who indulges in sound, color, scent, and flavor, and so harms the self, walks the path toward death. These two conditions already distinguish the paths of life and death.

Furthermore, Su Shi notes that one who is constantly active but does not know how to rest, who knows how to speak but not how to keep silent, and who knows how to think but not how to let go, will eventually become exhausted. This is ceaseless agitation, which likewise leads onto the path of death. If the course of human life is divided into ten parts, three parts belong to life and three to death. The paths of life and death together account for nine parts, and the remaining part is the path of neither life nor death.

What is meant by neither life nor death is what the Yi (Classic of Changes) calls "quiescent and unmoving" (jiran bu dong), the state in which the myriad things have not yet stirred and have returned to tranquility. Laozi speaks only of the nine parts concerning life and death and does not explicitly name the one part beyond them, leaving the reader to realize it personally and so to experience the profound mystery of being without thought and without action.

Where there is life, there is death, so even one who nourishes life still belongs to the path of life and death. The more a person depends on and craves the things of life, the more readily they walk toward death, which is why the path of death often occupies nine of the ten parts. The sage constantly dwells in the realm of neither life nor death, having no footing even within life. How, then, could there be a place for death?

笔乘:生之徒十有三,此练形住世者也。死之徒十有三,此殉欲忘生者也。人之生动之死地十有三,此断灭种性者也。凡此十分之中,率居其九,皆生生之厚者也。夫有生必有死,是生固死之地矣,兕虎甲兵将安避之?善摄生则无生矣,故兕之角无所投,虎之爪无所措,兵之刃无所容。何者?彼无地以受之也。厚生者九,无生者一,老子于十者之中,阙一自拟,其旨微矣。然圣人无生,非故薄之也,本无生也。昔人云:爱生者可杀也,爱洁者可污也,爱荣者可辱也,爱完者可破也。本无生,孰杀之?本无洁,孰污之?本无荣,孰辱之?本无完,孰破之?知此者,可以出完者可破也。本无生,孰杀之?本无洁,孰污之?本无荣,孰辱之?本无完,孰破之?知此者,可以出入造化,游戏死生。 道生之,德畜之,物形之,势成之。是以万物莫不尊道而贵德。道之尊,德之贵,夫莫之爵而常自然。故道生之畜之,长之育之,亭之毒之,养之覆之。生而不有,为而不恃,长而不宰,是谓玄德。 畜,许六反。夫音符。长,上声,下同。
Interpretation

The Bi Cheng holds that of every ten people, three cling to life, training the body and seeking to prolong their stay in the world. Three more chase their desires and forget their lives. Another three, through improper action, walk toward a deadly end and sever the very root of their lives. Most people fall within these nine groups: those who overvalue life and endlessly pursue nourishment.

Whatever has life will eventually die, so life itself carries the possibility of death. Where could one hide from the si (a legendary rhinoceros-like beast), the tiger, or weapons? One who is skilled at nourishing life, however, reaches a state of attaching to nothing in life. Thus the horns of the si find nothing to strike, the tiger's claws find nothing to grasp, and weapons cannot harm him, because he offers nothing for harm to hold onto.

Nine in ten people value life, and only one reaches the state of wusheng (non-life, or being beyond the grasp of life and death). Laozi left one category of these ten unnamed and placed himself within it, and the implication is profound. Yet the sage's attainment of wusheng does not come from deliberately despising life. He simply has no attachment to life to begin with. The ancients said: those who cherish life are easily killed; those who cherish purity are easily defiled; those who cherish honor are easily humiliated; those who cling to wholeness are easily broken. If one is fundamentally unattached to life, who can kill him? If one is fundamentally unattached to purity, who can defile him? If one is fundamentally unattached to honor, who can disgrace him? If one is fundamentally unattached to wholeness, who can destroy him? Understanding this allows one to move in and out of the processes of creation and to be at ease between life and death.

The Dao (dào) gives birth to and nourishes all things, and the De (dé) nurtures them. Each of the myriad things forms its own body and grows according to its own conditions and circumstances. For this reason, all things revere the Dao and treasure the De. That the Dao is revered and the De is treasured is not because anyone conferred titles upon them; it is simply how things naturally are. The Dao brings things into being, nourishes them, lets them grow and develop, brings them to maturity and flourishing, and then sustains and shelters them. This is what is meant by producing and raising all things without claiming them as one's own, acting without relying on oneself, and promoting growth without exercising control. This is called xuande (xuán dé, profound virtue), a power that is deep and natural.

The first character, meaning "to rear" or "to nourish," is read xù, following the traditional fanqie spelling xu liu qie. The second character, meaning "husband," is read fú. The third character, meaning "long" or "elder," is read in the rising tone (shǎng shēng).

苏注:道者万物之母,故生万物者道也。及其运而为德,牧养群众而不辞,故畜万物者德也。然而道德则不能自形,因物而后形见。物则不能自成,远近相取,刚柔相交,积而为势,而后兴亡治乱之变成矣。形虽由物,成虽由势,而非道不生,非德不畜,是以尊道而贵德。尊如父兄,贵如侯王,道无位而德有名故也。恃爵而后尊贵者,非成矣。形虽由物,成虽由势,而非道不生,非德不畜,是以尊道而贵德。尊如父兄,贵如侯王,道无位而德有名故也。恃爵而后尊贵者,非实尊贵也。 天下有始,以为天下母。既得其母,以知其子,既知其子,复守其母,殁身不殆。塞其兑,闭其门,终身不勤。开其兑,济其事,终身不救。见小曰明,守柔曰强。用其光,复归其明。无遗身殃,是谓袭常。 兑,口也。人之有口,家之有门,皆喻物所从出者。塞而闭之,藏有於无,守母者也。《参同契》云:耳目己之宝,闭固勿发扬。兑口勿以谈,希之顺以洪。即此义。不可目窥曰小。不可力得曰柔。遗,唯季反。袭常,犹前言袭明,密而不露也。《记》曰:揜而充裘曰袭。
Interpretation

Dao (the Way) is the root of all things, and so all things come into being through Dao. Dao moves and appears as De (Virtue/Power), and De nourishes the myriad things without tiring, so all things are sustained through De. Yet Dao and De cannot manifest on their own; they must be seen through the myriad things. The myriad things, in turn, cannot accomplish anything alone. They depend on one another, near and far, and the hard and the soft interact, gathering into definite configurations of circumstance (shi). Only then do changes such as rise and fall, order and chaos, appear. Although the myriad things become visible through their physical forms, and affairs are accomplished through their circumstances, without Dao nothing could come into being, and without De nothing could be nourished. For this reason, people honor Dao and value De. Honoring Dao is like revering one's father and elder brother, and valuing De is like esteeming a feudal lord or king. Dao holds no rank, yet De holds a proper standing (míngfèn). If one is respected only for rank, that is not true nobility.

All things under heaven have a beginning, and this beginning is the root of all things under heaven. To understand the root is to recognize the myriad things that arise from it, and having recognized them, to still hold fast to the root is to be free of danger for a lifetime. Block the passages through which the senses and desires of the eyes, ears, mouth, and nose rush outward, and shut the gates through which the spirit (shen) chases after external things, and one will be free of toil for a lifetime. If one indulges the senses and busies oneself with affairs, one will find no remedy for a lifetime. To perceive what is subtle is called clarity (míng), and to keep hold of softness is called strength (qiáng). To make use of outer brightness and then return to inner discernment, leaving no calamity for oneself, is called secretly inheriting the constant Dao (chángdào).

Here, duì refers to the mouth, and mén means the gate or doorway. Both serve as metaphors for the passages through which things enter and leave. Blocking these passages and gathering external things inward is the method of guarding the root. The Cantong Qi (Kinship of the Three) says: "The ears and eyes are one's own treasures; hold them in and guard them, and do not reveal them outwardly. Do not speak carelessly with the mouth; remain silent and still, and only then can you accord with the vast Dao." This carries the same meaning as the present passage. "Small" refers to not letting others directly glimpse it with the eyes, and "soft" refers to not obtaining it through force. "Inheriting the constant" is close in meaning to the earlier "inheriting the bright," describing the quiet reception of the constant Dao so that it does not show itself. The Book of Rites says that to conceal something and fill its interior is called xí (inheriting).

Su Shi's commentary says: "The Nameless (wúmíng) is the beginning of Heaven and Earth, and the Named (yǒumíng) is the mother of the myriad things."

苏注:无名,天地之始;有名,万物之母可目窥曰小。不可力得曰柔。遗,唯季反。袭常,犹前言袭明,密而不露也。《记》曰:揜而充裘曰袭。 苏注:无名,天地之始;有名,万物之母。道方无名,则物之所资始也,及其有名,则物之所资生也,故谓之始,又谓之母,其子则万物也。圣人体道以周物,譬如以母知其子,了然无不察也。虽其智能周之,然而未尝以物忘道,故终守其母也。天下皆具此道,然常患忘道而狥物。目悦于色,耳悦于声,开其悦之之心,而以其事济之,是以终身而陷溺不能救。夫圣人之所以终身不勤者,唯塞而闭之,未尝出而狥之也。悦之为害,始小而浸大。知小之将大而闭之,可谓明矣。趋其陷溺不能救。夫圣人之所以终身不勤者,唯塞而闭之,未尝出而狥之也。悦之为害,始小而浸大。知小之将大而闭之,可谓明矣。趋其所悦而不顾,自以为强,而非强也。唯见悦而知畏之者,可谓强矣。世人开其所悦,以身狥物,往而不反。圣人塞而闭之,非绝物也,以神应物,用其光而已,身不与也。夫耳之能听,目之能见,鼻之能臭,口之能尝,身之能触,心之能思,皆所谓光也。盖光与物接,物有去而明无损,是以应万变而不穷,殃不及于其身,故其常性湛然相袭而不绝矣。 使我介然有知,行于大道,惟施是畏。大道甚夷,而民好径。朝甚除,田甚芜,仓甚虚,服文采,带利剑,厌饮食,资货有余,是谓盗竽。非道哉。
Interpretation

Su Zhe's commentary explains that the "nameless" (wuming) is the beginning of heaven and earth, and the "named" (youming) is the mother of the myriad things. When the Dao (the Way) is in its nameless state, it is the root from which all things begin; when it appears in its named state, it is the source from which all things grow. Therefore it is called the "beginning," and it is also called the "mother," the one that gives birth to the myriad things.

The sage comprehends the great Dao and responds to the myriad things through it, just as a mother knows her children, seeing each of them clearly. Although his wisdom is sufficient to penetrate all things, he does not become absorbed in external things and forget the Dao, and so he always holds fast to the root. All people originally possess this Dao, yet they often chase external things because they have forgotten it. The eyes covet colors and the ears covet sounds. Once a person releases the heart to pursue these desires and keeps satisfying them, he will be immersed in them for his whole life and be unable to extricate himself.

The sage lives without toil throughout his life because he shuts away the heart that chases desire and never indulges himself in pursuing external things. The harm caused by desire is small at first but gradually grows. To recognize that a small desire will expand and to halt it in time is what counts as wisdom. To know full well that chasing desire leads to immersion and yet press on regardless, considering oneself brave and strong, is in truth not strength. Only one who, upon seeing temptation, knows to be wary and cautious deserves to be called strong.

Worldly people indulge their desires and let themselves follow external things, and once they set off, it is hard to turn back. The sage restrains and constrains himself, not to cut off contact with the myriad things, but to respond to them with his spirit, using only the luminous perception of the senses without letting himself fall into pursuit. The ears can hear, the eyes can see, the nose can smell, the mouth can taste, the body can feel, and the heart can think. These are what is called "light," that is, the capacity to perceive external things. When perception meets external things, the inner clarity is not harmed even after those things pass away. Therefore the sage can respond to ten thousand changes without exhaustion, misfortune does not fall upon him, and his tranquil, constant nature can continue unbroken.

"Were I to have even a little clear insight and walk upon the great Dao, what I would most fear is straying from the proper way." The great Dao is level and broad, yet people are fond of taking side paths. The court is neglected and in disarray, the fields lie waste, and the granaries are empty, yet people wear splendid clothing, carry sharp swords, eat and drink to excess, and hoard surplus wealth. This is called "daoyu" (those who, like bandits, act with arrogant authority). How could this accord with the Dao?

介然有知,犹言微有知也。是畏。大道甚夷,而民好径。朝甚除,田甚芜,仓甚虚,服文采,带利剑,厌饮食,资货有余,是谓盗竽。非道哉。 介然有知,犹言微有知也。夸张曰施,啬之反也。夷,平也。路狭而捷为径。除,治也,传曰粪除先人之敝庐是也。青赤为文,色丝为采。傅奕云:采是古文绣字。资货一作财货,盗竿误作盗夸,今从韩非本。 苏注:体道者无知、无行、无所施设,而物自化。今介然有知而行于大道,则有施设建立,非其自然有足畏者矣。大道夷易,无夸,今从韩非本。 苏注:体道者无知、无行、无所施设,而物自化。今介然有知而行于大道,则有施设建立,非其自然有足畏者矣。大道夷易,无有险阻,世之不知者,以为迂远,而好径以求捷,故凡舍其自然而有所施设者,皆欲速者也。俗人昭昭,我独若昏,俗人察察,我独闷闷。岂复饰末废本,以施设为事,夸以诲盗哉。 善建者不拔,善抱者不脱,子孙祭祀不辍。修之于身,其德乃真;修之于家,其德乃余;修之于乡,其德乃长;修之于邦,其德乃丰;修之于天下,其德乃普。故以身观身,以家观家,以乡观乡,以邦观邦,以天下观天下。吾何以知天下之然哉?以此。 邦一作国,汉人避高帝讳改之,於韵不叶,今从韩非本。
Interpretation

"Merely having a little cleverness and knowledge will give rise to fear and scheming. The great Dao (dào) is level and broad, yet the common people prefer to take narrow shortcuts. The palaces and halls of the court are repaired to a brilliant polish while the fields lie waste and the granaries stand empty. People wear splendid robes, hang sharp swords at their waists, and eat and drink to excess while still having goods to spare. This is like the music of bandits, and it does not accord with the Dao."

"'Merely having a little cleverness and knowledge' means having slight ingenuity. Yi (yí) means level, and jing (jìng) means a narrow, convenient path. Xiu (xiū) means to repair. Wencai (wéncǎi) refers to brilliant colors and silk fabrics. Some editions write zihuo (zīhuò) as caihuo (cáihuò), meaning wealth and goods. Some editions mistakenly write daokua (dàokuā) for daoyu (dàoyú), the bandit's pipe music. Here we follow the version quoted by Han Feizi (Hán Fēizǐ)."

Su Zhe (Sū Zhé) comments that one who embodies the Dao does not act through cleverness or deliberate contrivance, and so the myriad things transform in their natural way. If a person thinks they possess some insight and keeps arranging matters and establishing institutions upon the Dao, they will go against nature, and this is why it causes fear. The Dao is smooth and free of obstacles, yet people mistakenly think it is distant and difficult, and so they love to take shortcuts in pursuit of speed. Whenever one abandons what is natural and acts deliberately, one is merely impatient for results. The people of the world appear clever and quick, while I alone seem dim and slow. The people of the world are shrewd and exacting, while I alone appear simple and easygoing. How could one decorate the branches, abandon the root, treat deliberate action as the essential task, and even boast and show off, teaching people to chase profit like thieves?

"Those who are good at establishing a foundation will not be easily uprooted, and those who are good at holding fast will not easily let go, so their descendants can continue the sacrifices. When the Dao is cultivated in oneself, one's De (dé) becomes genuine. When it is cultivated in the family, one's De becomes abundant. When it is cultivated in the village, one's De endures. When it is cultivated in the state, one's De flourishes. When it is cultivated in the world, one's De becomes universal. Therefore, one may observe the self through the self, the family through the family, the village through the village, the state through the state, and the world through the world. How do I know the condition of the world? By this principle."

"'Bang' (bāng) appears in some editions as 'guo' (guó). Because of the taboo on the personal name of Emperor Gaozu of Han, Liu Bang, the Han dynasty used 'guo' instead. However, that does not fit the original rhyme, so here we follow the version 'bang' quoted by Han Feizi."

苏注:世岂有建而不拔,抱而不脱,以邦观邦,以天下观天下。吾何以知天下之然哉?以此。 邦一作国,汉人避高帝讳改之,於韵不叶,今从韩非本。 苏注:世岂有建而不拔,抱而不脱者乎?唯圣人知性之真,审物之妄,捐物而修身,其德充积,实无所立而其建有不可拔者,实无所执而其抱有不可脱者,故至其子孙,犹以祭祀不辍也。身既修,推其余以及外,虽至于治天下可也。天地外者,世俗所不见矣,然其理可推而知也。修身之至,以身观身,以家观家,以乡观乡,以国观国,皆吾之所及知也,然安知圣人以天下观天下,亦若吾之以身观身乎?岂身可以身观,而天下独不可以天下观乎夕.故曰吾何以知天下之然哉,以此。言亦以身知之耳。 含德之厚,比于赤子。毒虫不螫,猛兽不据,攫鸟不搏。骨弱筋柔而握固,未知牝牡之合而□作,精之至也。终日号而不嗄,和之至也。知和曰常,知常曰明鸟不搏。骨弱筋柔而握固,未知牝牡之合而□作,精之至也。终日号而不嗄,和之至也。知和曰常,知常曰明,益生曰祥,心使气曰强。物壮则老,谓之不道,不道早已。 毒虫,蜂虿之类,以尾端肆毒曰螫。猛兽,虎豹之类,以爪按拏曰据。攫
Interpretation

Where in the world is there anything truly established that cannot be uprooted, or firmly held that cannot slip away? One comes to know a state by observing a state, and comes to know the world by observing the world. How do I know the condition of the world? By means of this principle.

The word "bang" (state) is written "guo" in some editions. In the Han dynasty, scholars changed "bang" to "guo" to avoid the personal name of Han Gaozu, Liu Bang. But "guo" does not rhyme with the surrounding text, so this translation follows the "bang" of the Han Feizi edition.

Su Shi's commentary says: Where in the world is there anything that, once established, cannot be uprooted, or that, once held, cannot slip away? Only the sage understands the true nature of what is real, and also sees clearly the illusoriness of external things. Therefore he sets external things aside and cultivates himself. His De (virtue) accumulates and fills out. Outwardly he seems to have deliberately established nothing, yet he has built a foundation that cannot be uprooted. He clings to nothing, yet he possesses a hold that will not slip. For this reason, even down to his descendants, the sacrifices continue without interruption.

Once one has cultivated oneself, one extends the surplus De outward, and then even governing the world can be accomplished. Matters beyond heaven and earth are not visible to ordinary people, yet one can still infer them through principle. A person who has reached the utmost in self-cultivation observes himself through himself, observes the family through the family, observes the village through the village, and observes the state through the state. These are all things we can understand. How, then, do we know that the sage observes the world through the world just as we observe ourselves through ourselves? Can the self be observed from the self while the world cannot be observed from the world? Therefore it is said: "How do I know the condition of the world? By means of this principle." That is to say, a person likewise knows the world by means of himself.

A person of deep De is like a newborn infant. Poisonous insects do not sting him, fierce beasts do not pounce on him, and birds of prey do not seize him. His bones are soft and his sinews pliant, yet his grip is firm. He does not yet know of union between male and female, yet his genitals become erect, because his Jing (essence) is abundant to the utmost. He cries all day, yet his voice does not go hoarse, because his Qi (vital energy) is harmonized to the utmost. Knowing harmony is called "chang" (constancy), and knowing constancy is called "ming" (clarity). Those who crave long life and overindulge in nourishing life invite calamity. To let the mind command the breath is to force things. When things develop to the point of vigor and flourishing, they proceed toward decline. This is called not according with the Dao (the Way), and what does not accord with the Dao perishes early.

"Poisonous insect" (du chong) refers to bees, scorpions, and similar creatures that release a poisonous sting from the tail. "Shi" means to sting. "Fierce beast" refers to tigers, leopards, and similar animals that press down upon and seize their prey with claws. "Jue" means to seize with claws.

鸟,雕鹗之类,以羽距击触曰搏。赵志坚曰:以四指握拇指为握固。□,子垂反,《说文》云:赤子阴也。号,平声。嗄,所嫁反,声嘶也。又啼极无声曰嗄,一作嗌不嗄。黄茂材云:古本无嗌字,嗌不嘎,庄子之文,后人增入之。祥,吉凶之候也。 苏注:老子之言道德,每以婴儿况之者,皆言其体而已,未及其用也。夫婴儿泊然无钦,其体则至矣,然而物来而不知应,故未可以言用也。吉凶之候也。
Interpretation

"Bo" refers to birds striking or touching with their wings and claws, as birds of prey such as the eagle and the osprey do. Zhao Zhijian explains that "woguo" (grasping and holding firm) is the gesture of closing the four fingers over the thumb. The missing character in this passage is read "zi chui qie," and the Shuowen Jiezi (Explaining Simple Characters and Analyzing Compound Ones) says it refers to an infant's genitals. "Hao" is read in the level tone. "Sha" is read "suo jia qie" and refers to a hoarse voice. It can also mean crying until no sound comes out. Another edition reads "yi bu sha" instead. Huang Maocai notes that early editions lack the character "yi," and that "yi bu sha" is wording from the Zhuangzi that later readers added. "Xiang" refers to omens of good or ill fortune.

Su Shi's commentary says that when Laozi speaks of Dao De, he often uses the infant as a metaphor, and that these passages describe only the Daoti (the body of the Dao) without yet reaching the Dao zhi yong (the function or application of the Dao). The infant is calm and tranquil, free of desire, and this state manifests the highest degree of the Dao's body. But when external things arrive, the infant does not yet know how to respond, so it cannot yet be said to have manifested the function of the Dao.

苏注:老子之言道德,每以婴儿况之者,皆言其体而已,未及其用也。夫婴儿泊然无钦,其体则至矣,然而物来而不知应,故未可以言用也。道无形体,物莫得而见也,况可得而伤之乎?人之所以至于有形者,由其有心也。故有心而后有形,有形而后有敌,敌立而伤之者至矣。无心之人,物无与敌者,而曷由伤之?夫赤子所以至此者,唯无心也。无执而自握,无欲而自作,是以知其精有余而非心也。心动则气伤,气伤则号而哑。终日号而不哑,是以知其心不动而气和也。和者,不以外伤内也。复命曰常,遇物而知反其本者也。知和曰常,得而非心也。心动则气伤,气伤则号而哑。终日号而不哑,是以知其心不动而气和也。和者,不以外伤内也。复命曰常,遇物而知反其本者也。知和曰常,得本以应万物者也。其实一道也,故皆谓之常。生不可益而欲益之,则非其正矣。气恶妄作,而又以心使之,则强梁甚矣。益生使气,不能听其自然。日入于刚强而老从之,则失其赤子之性矣。
Interpretation

Su Shi's commentary says: when Laozi speaks of the Dao and De, he often uses the infant as a metaphor. This explains their fundamental substance, not yet their function. The infant is tranquil and without desire, his nature pure and whole; yet when external things arrive, he does not yet know how to respond, and so one cannot yet say that he has embodied their "function" (yong).

The Dao has no form, so the myriad things cannot see it, and how could anything harm it? A person has a physical form because of mental intention (xin nian). When there is intention, a form takes shape; once there is form, there is opposition and conflict, and once opposition arises, harm follows. For one without intention, external things cannot stand against him, so where could harm come from? The infant can maintain this state only because there is no attachment (zhi nian) in his heart.

The infant does not deliberately grasp, yet his hand closes of its own accord; no desire drives him, yet his body moves naturally. This shows that his jing (essence) and qi (vital energy) are abundant and do not depend on the mind to direct them. When the mind stirs, the qi is injured; once the qi is injured, the crying becomes hoarse. That the infant can cry all day without his voice going hoarse shows that his heart has not been disturbed and his breath remains harmonious. What is meant by "harmony" (he) is not allowing external things to harm what is within.

"Returning to the constant is called 'the constant'" means that when encountering things, one knows to return to the root of life. "Knowing harmony is called 'the constant'" means that one knows how to harmonize, and though one may obtain things, one does not turn them into private possession. These two statements actually express the same principle, which is why both are called "constant" (chang).

Life cannot be augmented through artifice, and to force an increase is to depart from its normal state. Qi abhors agitation, and if one further drives it with the mind, it becomes excessively rigid. To deliberately enhance life or forcibly circulate qi is to fail to follow what is natural; gradually one falls into rigidity, aging follows, and in the end one loses the infant's original nature.

知者不言,言者不知。塞其兑,闭其门,挫其锐,解其纷,和其光,同其尘,是谓玄同。不可得而亲,不可得而疏,不可得而利,不可得而害,不解其纷,和其光,同其尘,是谓玄同。不可得而亲,不可得而疏,不可得而利,不可得而害,不可得而贵,不可得而贱,故为天下贵。 苏注:道非言说,亦不离言说,然能知者未必言,能言者未必知。唯塞兑闭门以杜其外,挫锐解纷,和光同尘以治其内者,默然不同而与道同也。可得而亲则亦可得而疏,可得而利则亦可得而害,可得而贵则亦可得而贱。体道者均覆万物,而孰为亲疏?等观逆顺,而孰为利害?不知荣辱,而孰为贵贱?情计之所不及此,所以为天下贵也。 以正治国,以奇用兵,以无事取天下。吾何以知天下之然哉?天下多忌讳,而民弥贫;民多利器,国家滋昏;人多技巧,奇物滋起;法令滋章,盗贼多下。吾何以知天下之然哉?天下多忌讳,而民弥贫;民多利器,国家滋昏;人多技巧,奇物滋起;法令滋章,盗贼多有。故圣人云:我无为而民自化,我好静而民自正,我无事而民自富,我无欲而民自朴。
Interpretation

Those who understand the Dao do not speak of it lightly, and those who love grand discourse are not necessarily the ones who understand it. The Dao cannot be fully expressed in words, yet it has no fundamental disconnection from them. Those who cultivate the Dao quiet the senses and shut the gates of external desire. They blunt their sharpness, dissolve entanglements, and keep their radiance hidden. They dwell among the mundane world without setting themselves apart. This is called xuantong (union with the profound and subtle Dao).

Such a person does not seem approachable, nor does seem distant. Others do not regard them as profitable, nor as harmful. They are not considered noble, nor are they considered lowly, and so they become the most precious person under heaven. Su's commentary explains: if one can be drawn near, one may also be pushed away; if one can bring benefit, one may also cause harm; if one is honored as noble, one may also be cast down as base. Those who truly embody the Dao protect all things equally, without distinguishing between near and far. They treat favorable and adverse circumstances alike and do not calculate gain or loss. They do not cling to glory or disgrace, and so they do not fall into the distinctions of noble and base. Worldly calculation cannot reach this state, which is why such a person is the most precious.

Govern the state with correct means, direct warfare with flexible tactics, and rule the world without disturbing the people. How do I know that the world is governed in this way? The more prohibitions and taboos there are in the realm, the poorer the people become. The more sharp tools there are among the populace, the more chaotic the state becomes. The more people delight in cleverness, the more strange and curious things appear. The more dense the laws, the more thieves and robbers there are.

Therefore the sage says: when I practice wuwei (non-action), the people transform and nourish themselves naturally. When I favor stillness, the people become upright of their own accord. When I do not burden them with affairs, the people grow prosperous naturally. When I have no excessive desires, the people return naturally to simplicity.

苏注:古之圣人柔远能迩,无意于用兵,唯不得已然后有征伐之事,故以治国为正,以用兵为奇。虽然,此亦未足以取天下。天下神器,不可为也,为者败之,执者失之。唯体道者廓然无事,虽不取天下而天下归之矣。人主多忌讳,下情不上达6,则民贫而无告。利器,权谋也。明君在上,常使民无知无欲,民多权谋,则其上眩而昏矣。人不务本业而趋末技,则非常无益之物作矣。患人之诈伪,而多为法令以胜之,民无所措手足,则日入于盗贼矣。 其政闷闷,其民淳常无益之物作矣。患人之诈伪,而多为法令以胜之,民无所措手足,则日入于盗贼矣。 其政闷闷,其民淳淳;其政察察,其民缺缺。祸兮福所倚,福兮祸所伏。孰知其极?其无正邪?正复为奇,善复为祆。人之迷也,其日固久矣。是以圣人方而不割,廉而不刿,直而不肆,光而不耀。 闷音门。缺,残缺也,一作gg,失望貌。以其察察,宜无不及,故人望之而卒失望也。极,终也。奇,衰也。廉,棱也。刿,居卫反,割也。皆谓芒利伤物也。
Interpretation

Su's commentary says that the ancient sages pacified distant peoples and drew near to those close at hand through gentleness, and did not wish to employ armies. They went to war only when they had no choice. Governing the state is therefore the constant norm, while deploying troops and using force is an expedient measure. Even so, such measures are still not enough to win the world (tianxia). The world is a spiritual vessel that cannot be forced into action, since forcing action brings failure and clinging to it brings loss. Only one who embodies the Dao (the Way) is broad and unhurried, does not act recklessly, and so, even without contending for the world, has the world return to him.

Rulers often set up many prohibitions, which block the feelings of the people from rising upward, so the common people grow impoverished and have no means of appeal. The "sharp instruments" (liqi) refer to schemes and stratagems. An enlightened ruler above should keep the people few in cunning calculations and few in desires. If the people are full of schemes, those above will be deceived and thrown into confusion. When people neglect their fundamental occupations and chase minor crafts, all kinds of useless things arise. A ruler who fears being deceived by the people keeps adding laws to suppress them. The result is that the people are left at a loss and gradually fall into banditry.

When government is loose and not harsh, the people are simple and honest. When government is strict and scrutinizing, the people become deficient and disappointed. Misfortune often rests upon good fortune, and good fortune conceals misfortune within it. Who can know where these changes will finally lead? Is there not a constant standard within them? The normal turns into the abnormal, and the good may turn into the monstrous. People have been lost in this process of change for a long time. Therefore the sage is upright but does not injure others, has sharp corners but does not pierce others, is straight but does not indulge, and is bright but does not dazzle.

The commentary explains that the first character, pronounced men, describes government that is loose and not scrutinizing. The character que means lacking or incomplete, and some editions write shiwang (disappointment) instead. When government appears so clear and thorough that nothing escapes it, people expect no disappointment, yet in the end they are disappointed. Ji means the endpoint, and qi means deviation from the norm. Lian refers to corners or edges, and the character gui, meaning to cut or wound, is read here as gui. In all these cases, the point is that sharp edges harm others.

苏注:天地之大,世俗之见有所眩而不知也。盖福倚于祸,祸伏于福,譬如老稚生死之相继,未始有止而迷者不知也。夫惟圣人出于万物之表,而揽其终始,得其大全,而遗其小察,视之闷闷,若无所明而其民醇醇,各全其性矣。出于万物之表,而揽其终始,得其大全,而遗其小察,视之闷闷,若无所明而其民醇醇,各全其性矣。若夫世人不知道之全体,以耳目之所知为至,彼方且自以为福,而不知祸之伏于后,方且自以为善,而不知祸之起于中。区区以察为明,至于察甚伤物,而不悟其非也,可不哀哉。知小察之不能尽物,是以虽能方能廉,能直能光,而不用其能,恐其陷于一偏而不反也,此则世俗所谓闷闷也。 治人事天,莫若啬。夫惟啬,是谓早服。早服谓之重积德,重积德则无不克,无不克则莫知其极。莫知其极,可以有国。有国之母,可以长久。是谓深根固柢长生久视之道。 服一作复。柢一作蒂,花趺也。
Interpretation

Su Shi's commentary observes that the movement of Heaven and Earth is vast, and that worldly eyes, easily confused by what lies before them, cannot grasp its principle. Fortune leans upon misfortune, and misfortune hides fortune within it, just as old age and youth, and life and death, follow one another without pause. Only the deluded fail to notice this.

The sage transcends the limits of the myriad things and can grasp their changes from beginning to end. He comprehends the whole of the Great Dao (Dao, the Way) and does not cling to trivial details. He may seem muddled, as if he understands nothing, yet the common people thereby keep their simplicity and each preserves their own nature. Ordinary people do not grasp the full picture of the Dao. They take what the ears and eyes perceive to be the highest understanding. What they consider fortune now, they do not realize hides misfortune behind it, and what they consider good, they do not realize may give rise to calamity. They cling to minute scrutiny and mistake it for clear sight. As a result, excessive observation harms things, and they do not recognize that their own methods are mistaken. This is truly lamentable.

The sage knows that minute observation cannot exhaust the myriad things. Therefore, even when he has the capacity to make things upright, incorruptible, straight, and bright, he does not readily exercise these abilities. He fears falling into partiality and being unable to return to the Dao. This is what the world calls "menmen," meaning dim or unassuming: one does not appear clever or pursue close inspection.

Governing the people and serving Heaven by following the Dao is nothing better than thrift and restraint. To be able to practice thrift and restraint is called early submission to the Dao, and early submission to the Dao means continually accumulating De (Virtue, Power). When De is deeply accumulated, nothing cannot be overcome, and when nothing cannot be overcome, no one can fathom its limits. Only one who has reached this state may bear the responsibility of governing the state. One who grasps the fundamental principles of governance allows the state to endure long. This is the principle of deep roots and lasting survival.

In some editions, "fu," meaning to submit, is written as "fu," meaning to return. In some editions, "di," meaning root, is written as "di," which refers to the part where the calyx joins the flower. Here it serves as a metaphor for the root.

苏注:凡物方则割,廉则刿,直则肆,光则耀。唯圣人方而不割,廉而不刿,直而不肆,光而不耀,此所谓注:凡物方则割,廉则刿,直则肆,光则耀。唯圣人方而不割,廉而不刿,直而不肆,光而不耀,此所谓啬也。夫啬者,有而不用者也。世患无以服人,苟诚有而能音,虽未尝与物较,而物知其非不能也,则其服之早矣。物既已服,敛藏其用,至于殁身而终不试,则德重积矣。德积既厚,虽天下之刚强无不能克,则物莫测其量矣,如此而后可以有国。彼世之小人,有尺寸之柄而轻用之,一试不服,天下测知其深浅而争犯之,虽欲保其国家,不可得也。吾是以知音之可以有国,可以有国则有国之母也。孟子曰:存其心,养其性,所以事天也。以啬治人,则可以有国者是也。以啬事天,则深根固蒂者是也。古之圣人,保其性命之常,不以外耗内,则根深而不可拔,蒂固而不可脱,以啬治人,则可以有国者是也。以啬事天,则深根固蒂者是也。古之圣人,保其性命之常,不以外耗内,则根深而不可拔,蒂固而不可脱,虽以长生久视可也。啬盖治人事天,虽有内外之异,而莫若啬则一也。 治大国,若烹小鲜。以道莅天下,其鬼不神。非其鬼不神,其神不伤人;非其神不伤人,圣人亦不伤之。夫两不相伤,故德交归焉。
Interpretation

All things have edges and corners that can wound people. If they are too sharp, they are apt to pierce; if they are too forthright, they are apt to become unrestrained; if they shine too brightly, they are apt to dazzle. Only the sage has edges and corners without wounding, sharpness without piercing, uprightness without excess, and radiance without display. This is what is meant by “cherishing”: conserving and restraining one’s strength rather than using it lightly.

To cherish is to possess strength without using it readily. People often worry that they have no way to make others obey. But if they truly have strength and can keep their sharpness in check, then even without ever contending with anyone, others will understand that this is not weakness and will naturally submit early on. Once people have submitted, one can put one’s strength away and refrain from using it lightly for the rest of one’s life. In this way, De (Virtue/Power) continues to accumulate and deepen. When De has built up deeply, there is nothing in the world that is too strong to overcome; others, therefore, cannot measure one’s strength. Only by reaching this point can one govern a state.

Petty people in the world use whatever small measure of authority they hold carelessly. If they try to make people obey and fail, everyone will see how far their power extends and rise up to defy them. At that point, even if they wish to preserve the state, they will be unable to do so. Thus I know that only by restraining one’s strength can one govern a state; and by governing a state, one holds the key to its lasting survival. Mencius said, “Preserving the heart and nourishing one’s nature is how one serves Heaven’s decree.” Govern people according to the principle of cherishing, and one can govern a state; serve the Dao according to this principle, and one can make the foundations deep and the roots firm. The sages of old safeguarded the life’s original state, preventing external things from depleting the inner self. Thus their roots ran deep and were hard to uproot, and their foundations were secure and hard to shake. In this way, even the pursuit of long life and enduring vision could be fulfilled. Though governing people and serving the Dao according to the principle of cherishing differ as inner and outer matters, their fundamental principle is the same.

Governing a great state is like cooking a small fish: it should not be turned over too often. When the world is governed through the Dao, ghosts and spirits cannot produce strange disturbances. This does not mean that they have lost their efficacy; rather, even when they manifest, they do not harm people. They do not harm people, and the sage does not harm them. Since neither side harms the other, their De flows together.

莅,力至反。圣人亦不伤之,一作伤人。以下德交归焉观之,作之为是,之指神而言也。 苏注:烹小鲜者不可挠,治大国者不可烦。烦则人劳,挠则鱼烂。圣人无为,使人各安其自然。外无所烦,内无所畏,则物莫能侵,虽鬼无所用其神矣。非其鬼之不神,亦有神而不伤人耳。非神之不伤人,圣人未尝伤人,故其鬼无能为耳。人鬼所以不相伤者,由上有圣人也,故德交归之。 大国者下流,伤人耳。非神之不伤人,圣人未尝伤人,故其鬼无能为耳。人鬼所以不相伤者,由上有圣人也,故德交归之。 大国者下流,天下之交,天下之牝。牝常以静胜牡,以静为下。故大国以下小国,则取小国;小国而下大国,则取大国。故或下以取,或下而取。大国不过欲兼畜人,小国不过欲入事人。夫两者各得其所欲,故大者宜为下。 苏注:天下之归大国,犹众水之趋下流也。众动之赴静,犹众高之赴下也。大国能下,则小国附之,小国能下,则大国纳之。大国下以取人,小国下而取于人。
Interpretation

“Li” is read as though the syllables “li” and “zhi” were joined, giving the pronunciation lì. The sage likewise does not harm the people. Some versions read “harm people” instead of “harm them.” From the phrase “their De converges and returns,” it is clear that “them” here refers to the spirits.

Su Shi’s commentary says: “When cooking a small fish, one must not stir it repeatedly. In governing a great state, one must not issue cumbersome commands. Cumbersome commands burden the people; stirring a small fish breaks its flesh. The sage follows nature and does not interfere recklessly, allowing the people each to be at ease in their own way of life. With no disturbance from outside and no fear within, external things cannot harm them; even spirits have no way to exercise their power. This is not because the spirits lack power. Though they possess it, they do not harm people. The spirits cannot cause harm because the sage has never harmed the people. People and spirits can avoid harming one another because a sage governs above them, and so the De of all parties converges here.”

A great state is like the lower reaches of a river, where the waters of the realm converge; it is also like the female of the world. The female often prevails over the male through stillness, and through stillness takes the lower position. Thus, when a great state humbles itself before a small state, the small state will attach itself to it; when a small state humbles itself before a great state, the great state will accept it. The great state humbles itself in order to win the small state’s allegiance; the small state humbles itself in order to be accepted by the great state. The great state’s desire is simply to unite and care for the people, while the small state’s desire is simply to enter the great state’s service. Both can obtain what they seek, so the great state in particular should take the humble position.

Su Shi’s commentary says: “The people of the world attach themselves to a great state as waters flow toward low ground. The many moving things incline toward a place of stillness, just as the many high places converge on the low. When a great state can humble itself, small states will rely on it; when a small state can humble itself, a great state will accept it. The great state humbles itself to win the allegiance of other states; the small state humbles itself to gain acceptance by the great state.”

老子翼卷之三竟 1贱:原作『贻』,据万历本改大国能下,则小国附之,小国能下,则大国纳之。大国下以取人,小国下而取于人。 老子翼卷之三竟 1贱:原作『贻』,据万历本改。 2未闻:原作『夫则』,据万历本改。 3戎:原作『我』,据万历本改。 4郊:原作『郄』,据万历本改。 5天下:『下』字原脱,据万历本补。 6达:原作『建』,据万历本改。 老子翼卷之四 道者万物之奥,善人之宝,不善人之所保。美言可以市,尊行可以加人。人之不善,何弃之有?故立天子,置三公,虽有拱璧以先驷马,不如坐进此道。古之所以贵此道者,何不曰求以得,有罪以免耶?故为天下贵。 苏注:凡物之见于外者,皆其门堂
Interpretation

The third scroll of The Laozi’s Wings is complete.

1. The character “jian” originally read “yi”; it has been corrected on the basis of the Wanli edition.

2. “Wei wen” originally read “fu ze”; it has been corrected on the basis of the Wanli edition.

3. “Rong” originally read “wo”; it has been corrected on the basis of the Wanli edition.

4. “Jiao” originally read “xi”; it has been corrected on the basis of the Wanli edition.

5. The character “xia” was missing after “tianxia” in the original; it has been restored on the basis of the Wanli edition.

6. “Da” originally read “jian”; it has been corrected on the basis of the Wanli edition.

The fourth scroll of The Laozi’s Wings

The Dao is the hidden storehouse of all things—the foundation on which they come into being and find their place. It is also the treasure of good people. For those who are not good, it is still something they can rely on and use to preserve themselves. Fine words can win approval, and noble conduct can influence others. If people have faults, what reason is there to cast them aside?

Therefore, when appointing the Son of Heaven and selecting the Three Dukes, even if someone first presents paired jade discs and a chariot drawn by four horses, this is no match for sitting down and offering the Great Dao. Why did the ancients esteem the Great Dao? Was it not precisely because those who sought it could obtain it, and those who had committed offenses could use it to be absolved? That is why the Great Dao is the most honored thing under Heaven.

Su Shi’s commentary says: Everything that appears outwardly is like a doorway or hall belonging to the Dao.

也。道之在进此道。古之所以贵此道者,何不曰求以得,有罪以免耶?故为天下贵。 苏注:凡物之见于外者,皆其门堂 也。道之在物,譬如其奥,物皆有之,而人莫之见耳。夫唯贤者得而有之,故曰善人之宝。愚者虽不能有,然而非道则不能安也,故曰不善人之所保。盖道不远人,而人则远之。今诚有人美言之,则可以为市于世,尊行之,则可以加于人矣。朝为不义,而夕闻大道,妄尽而性复,虽欲指其不善,不可得也,而又安可弃之哉?立天子,置三公,将以道救人耳。虽有拱璧之贵妄尽而性复,虽欲指其不善,不可得也,而又安可弃之哉?立天子,置三公,将以道救人耳。虽有拱璧之贵,驷马之良而进之,不如进此道之多也。道本在我,人患不求,求则得之矣。道无功罪,人患不知,知则凡罪不能污也。 为无为,事无事,味无味。大小多少,报怨以德。图难于其易,为大于其细。天下难事必作于易,天下大事必作于细。是以圣人终不为大,故能成其大。夫轻诺必寡信,多易必多难。是以圣人犹难之,故终无难。 为,营为也。纯甫云:人皆有所为,圣人亦人耳,独无所为乎?但众人所为者,有为之事;圣人所为者,无为之道,此其所以异也。事,所为之条件也。味,所为之理人所为者,有为之事;圣人所为者,无为之道,此其所以异也。事,所为之条件也。味,所为之理趣也。作,起也。
Interpretation

The Dao exists within all things, like a mystery hidden deep inside them. All things possess it; people simply cannot see it. Only the wise truly understand and hold fast to the Great Dao. That is why the Dao is a treasure for good people. Though foolish people cannot truly possess the Dao, they cannot do without it: without it, they would have no way to establish themselves and live their lives. That is why the Dao is also a refuge for those who are not good. The Dao itself is never far from people; people are the ones who distance themselves from it.

If someone is skilled at speaking about the Dao, their words can become a precious treasure in the world. If someone honors and practices the Dao, they can use it to guide others. Suppose a person acts unjustly in the morning, then hears the Dao by evening, and their deluded thoughts vanish and their innate nature is restored. Even if someone then wanted to accuse them of being bad, they would have no grounds for doing so. How, then, could that person be cast aside? The original purpose of establishing an emperor and appointing the Three Dukes, high officials who assist the emperor, was to use the Dao to help the people. Even offering precious ceremonial jade discs large enough to encircle in one’s arms and fine horses would be less beneficial than passing the Dao on to others. The Dao is already within each person; the only concern is that they may not seek it. Once they do seek it, they can find it. The Dao itself neither records merit nor pronounces guilt. The only concern is that people may not understand it. Once they do, their many transgressions can no longer defile their nature.

When you wish to act, follow the principle of Wuwei (non-action). When you attend to affairs, do so without forcing things or acting recklessly. When you wish to savor something, savor the meaning contained in what is plain and tasteless. Treat great matters as small and the few as many; repay resentment with kindness. When planning for a difficult undertaking, begin with what is easy. To accomplish a great work, begin with what is small. The difficult things in the world surely arise from what is easy; the great things in the world surely begin with what is small. Thus, the sage never claims to be undertaking great things, and for that very reason is able to accomplish them. Careless promises are often hard to keep, and treating matters as too easy often brings more difficulties. The sage therefore always approaches things with care, and in the end has no problems that cannot be resolved.

Here, “acting” means deliberate contrivance and forced, reckless behavior. Chunfu says: Everyone acts, and the sage is human too. Can it be that the sage does nothing at all? The difference is that ordinary people engage in deliberate contrivance, while the sage follows the Dao of Wuwei, which accords with nature. “Affairs” refers to the specific matters that need attention; “flavor” refers to the principles and meaning within them. “Arise” means to come into being.

苏注:圣人为无为,故无所不为;事无事,故无所不事;味无味,故无所不味。其于大小多少,一以道遇之而已。盖人情之所不忘者,怨也。然及其爱恶之情忘,则虽报怨犹报德也。世人莫不畏大而侮小,难多而易少,至於难而后图,大而后为,则事常不济矣。圣人齐大小,一多少。无所不畏,无所不难,而安有不济者哉? 笔乘:夫事涉於形则有大小,系乎数则有多少,此怨所由起也。惟道非形非数,而圣人与之为一,以无为为为,以无事为事,以无味为味,爱恶妄除,圣凡情尽,而泊然栖乎性宅,则而圣人与之为一,以无为为为,以无事为事,以无味为味,爱恶妄除,圣凡情尽,而泊然栖乎性宅,则大小多少一以视之,而奚怨之可报哉?惟德以容之而已。然此无为、无事、无味也,不可力得至易也,不可目窥至细也,虽至易而至难者待此以解,虽至细而至大者待此以成,岂可以其易与细而忽之哉。学道者亦或有见於此,而又以为大之心夺之,故易与细不常为我有。唯圣人自始至终为无为,事无事,味无味,而不以世俗所谓大者分其心,故难者、大者当处寂然,了无留碍,而大道自此全矣,此所谓成其大者也。嗟乎,此非特起大丈夫见理明用心刚者不能信,不能守,而可与轻诺多易之流道哉。
Interpretation

Su’s Commentary: The sage acts through Wuwei (non-action), so there is nothing that cannot be accomplished. The sage handles affairs without acting rashly, so no matter is left unattended. The sage experiences things without clinging to their flavors, so every flavor can be appreciated. In matters of great and small, many and few, the sage follows the Great Dao and regards them as equal. What is hardest for people to forget is often resentment. Yet when feelings of love and hatred have faded, even repaying a grievance is like repaying a kindness, without resentment attached. People in the world fear what is great and scorn what is small; they put off what seems difficult and give importance only to what is plentiful. They always wait until a matter becomes difficult before making plans, and until it becomes large before beginning work. As a result, things often go unfinished. The sage sees great and small as one and many and few as equal, approaches both great and small with care, and takes both difficulty and ease seriously. How, then, could anything remain unaccomplished?

Brush Notes: When affairs involve particular forms, they differ in size; when they involve quantities, they differ in number. Resentment arises from these distinctions. Only the Dao transcends form and quantity. The sage becomes one with the Dao, making Wuwei the way of acting, non-doing the way of handling affairs, and flavorlessness the way of experiencing the myriad things. Deluded thoughts of love and hatred fall away, as do the distinctions between the ordinary and the sage; the sage dwells peacefully within their own nature. One with the Dao, the sage regards great and small, many and few, as equal. What grievance could there be to avenge? The sage need only treat all things with the forbearance of De (Virtue/Power).

Yet Wuwei, non-doing, and flavorlessness may seem easy to attain, but in fact they cannot be won through forceful striving. They may seem subtle and traceless, but they cannot be seen directly with the eyes. The most difficult and the easiest things are resolved through them; the most subtle and the greatest achievements are accomplished through them. How could we ignore them because they seem easy and slight? Those who study the Dao sometimes glimpse this, yet their minds are then carried away by the urge to pursue greatness, and so “easy” and “subtle” do not take lasting root in them.

Only the sage holds to Wuwei, non-doing, and flavorlessness from beginning to end, allowing no worldly notion of “great affairs” to distract the mind. Thus, when the most difficult and greatest matters arise, the sage responds in stillness, without obstruction. In this way the Great Dao is made whole, and truly great affairs are accomplished. Alas, unless one is a person of resolve, understanding, and steadfast purpose, it is difficult to believe and uphold this principle. How, then, could it be explained to those who promise lightly and regard every matter as far too easy?

其安易持,其未兆易谋,其脆易判,其微易散。为之於未有,治之於未乱。合抱之木,生於豪末;九成之台,起於累土;千里之行,始於足下。为者败之哉。 其安易持,其未兆易谋,其脆易判,其微易散。为之於未有,治之於未乱。合抱之木,生於豪末;九成之台,起於累土;千里之行,始於足下。为者败之,执者失之。是以圣人无为故无败,无执故无失。民之从事,常於几成而败之。慎终如始,则无败事。是以圣人欲不欲,不贵难得之货,学不学,复众人之所过,以恃万物之自然而不敢为。 脆,此芮反。判,一作破。成,一作层。今从傅奕古本。未有者,心未起时。未乱者,心未染时。几,平声。复,反也。恃,一作辅,非。既曰自然矣,而又辅之,非自然也。今从韩非本。
Interpretation

When circumstances are stable, they are easy to maintain; when a problem has yet to show signs, it is easy to plan for. Things are easy to break apart while they are still fragile, and easy to disperse when only the slightest sign has appeared. Therefore, deal with things before they arise, and bring order before disorder takes shape.

A great tree that takes two arms to encircle began as a tender shoot; a towering platform is built up from basketfuls of earth; a journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step beneath one’s feet. Deliberately forcing things often ends up ruining them; stubbornly holding on often ends up making them slip away. The sage follows the natural changes of things and does not act rashly, so does not bring failure upon himself. He does not cling to possession, so does not lose what he has.

People often fail at their undertakings just as they are about to succeed. If they could persevere to the end with the same care they showed at the beginning, they would not ruin their work. Thus, the sage seeks what ordinary people do not seek and does not prize rare goods; he learns what ordinary people do not learn and turns back to correct the mistakes everyone commonly makes. He follows the natural state of all things and does not dare to impose his own actions upon them.

Here, “not yet arisen” refers to the time before a thought has come into being; “not yet in disorder” refers to the time before the mind has been touched and disturbed by external things. “Turn back” means to return and correct. Some editions write “support” in place of “rely on,” but the commentator considers this unsuitable: since the text says to follow nature, assisting it would mean it was no longer natural. The reading “rely on” from the Han Feizi recension is therefore adopted.

苏注:方其未有,持而谋之足矣。及其将然,非泮而散之不去也,然犹愈于既成也。故为之于未有者上也,治之于未乱者次也。木也、台也、行也,积小成大,治乱祸福之来,持而谋之足矣。及其将然,非泮而散之不去也,然犹愈于既成也。故为之于未有者上也,治之于未乱者次也。木也、台也、行也,积小成大,治乱祸福之来,皆如彼三者。圣人待之以无为,守之以无执,故能使福自生,使祸自亡。譬如种苗,深耕而厚耘之,及秋自秾。譬如被盗,危坐而熟视之,盗将自郄。世人不知物之自然,以为非为不成,非执不留,故常与祸争胜,与福争赘,是以祸至于不救,福至于不成,盖其理然也。圣人知有为之害,不以人助天,始终皆因其自?然,故无不成者。世人心存于得丧,方事之微,犹有不知而听其自然者,及。见其几成而重失之,则未有不以为败之者矣。故曰慎终如始,则无败事。人皆狥其所欲以伤物,信其所学以害理。圣见其几成而重失之,则未有不以为败之者矣。故曰慎终如始,则无败事。人皆狥其所欲以伤物,信其所学以害理。圣人非无欲也,欲而不欲,故虽欲而不伤于物。非无学也,学而不革,故虽学而不害于理。然后内外空明,廓然无为,可以辅万物之自然,而待其自成矣。
Interpretation

Su Shi’s commentary says: Before something has happened, it is enough to watch attentively and make plans. When it is about to happen, it must be broken up and brought to an end, though this is still better than allowing it to cause consequences. So the highest wisdom is to address things before they arise; the next best is to govern a situation before it falls into disorder. Timber, an earthen platform, and a long journey all take shape through the gradual accumulation of small things. The arrival of order or disorder, good fortune or calamity, also takes shape gradually, just like these three.

The sage responds to things through Wuwei (non-action that follows their nature without imposing needless interference) and guards them through non-attachment (not clinging or trying to control them). Thus good fortune can grow on its own, and calamities can dissipate of themselves. It is like planting seedlings: if you till the soil deeply and weed diligently, they will flourish by autumn. Or, when thieves appear, if you sit calmly and observe with composure, they may retreat on their own.

People do not understand that all things have their own patterns. They assume that nothing can succeed unless they make it happen, and that nothing can be kept unless they hold on tightly. So they are always trying to overcome calamities and seize good fortune. When calamity comes, they cannot avert it; when good fortune comes, they cannot bring it to fruition. This is simply how things work. The sage understands the harm of forcing things and does not impose human will on nature. From beginning to end, the sage follows the way things are, and so nothing remains unaccomplished.

People are preoccupied with gain and loss. When something is just beginning to take shape, they may not notice it and let it develop on its own. But once they see it nearing success, they worry about losing it and end up making it fail. Hence the saying: “Treat the end with the same care as the beginning, and you will not spoil the work.”

People often follow their desires and thereby damage things. They also trust too blindly in what they have learned, and so go against the way things are. The sage is not without desire, but has desires without being led by them; therefore, personal wants do not cause harm to the myriad things. Nor is the sage without learning, but does not cling rigidly to what has been learned; therefore, learning does not obstruct the natural course of things. In this way, the mind is open and clear, inwardly and outwardly. Without imposing needless action, the sage helps the myriad things follow their own nature and waits for them to come to completion on their own.

古之善为道者,非以明民,将以愚之。民之难治,以其智多。故以智治国,国之贼;不以智治国,国之福。知此两者亦楷式。能知楷式,是谓玄德。玄德深矣远矣,与物反矣,乃至於大顺。 楷,模也。式,法也。下彻曰深,旁周曰远。反乃顺者。司马曰:物情莫不贵智,而有玄德者独贱之,虽反於物,乃顺於道。 苏注:古之所谓智者,知道之大全,而览於物之终始,故足贵也。凡民不足以知此,而溺于小智,以察为明,则智之害多矣独贱之,虽反於物,乃顺於道。 苏注:古之所谓智者,知道之大全,而览於物之终始,故足贵也。凡民不足以知此,而溺于小智,以察为明,则智之害多矣。.故圣人以道治民,非以明之,将以愚之耳。盖使之无知无欲,而听上之所为,则虽有过亦小矣。苟以智御人,人亦以智应之,则上下交相贼耳。吾之所贵者德也,物之所贵者智也,德与智固相反,然智之所顺者小而德之所顺者大也。 江海所以能为百谷王者,以其善下之,故能为百谷王。是以圣人欲上人,以其言下之,欲先人,以其身后之。是以处上而人不重,处前而人不能害。是以天下乐推而不厌。以其不争,故天下莫能与之争。
Interpretation

The people of ancient times who were skilled in putting the Dao to use did not try to make the people clever, but sought to keep them simple and free of excessive desires. The people are difficult to govern because they are too full of schemes and calculations. Governing a state through cleverness only brings disaster upon it; governing without cleverness brings it good fortune. Understanding the difference between these two approaches provides a guiding principle. To understand and abide by this principle is to possess Profound De (deep-reaching virtue in accord with the Great Dao). Profound De is deep and far-reaching. Though it runs counter to what the world values, it ultimately reaches a state in accord with the Dao.

“Model” means an example to follow; “rule” means a standard. “Deep” means reaching downward, while “far-reaching” means extending in every direction. Though this approach seems contrary on the surface, its results accord with the Dao. Sima says: People of the world all prize cleverness, but only those who possess Profound De look down on it. Though this way runs counter to worldly values, it accords with the Dao.

Su Shi’s commentary says: The wise people spoken of by the ancients could grasp the Dao as a whole and see how all things change from beginning to end. This is why their wisdom is worthy of esteem. Ordinary people may not understand such matters; they often become absorbed in petty cleverness and mistake close attention to details for wisdom. The harm caused by schemes and cunning is therefore considerable. So when the sages govern the people through the Dao, they do not try to make them clever, but seek to keep them simple and free of excessive desires. If the people are not drawn along by schemes and desires, and follow the rule of those above them, then even when mistakes occur, the harm they cause will be limited. But if people are controlled through cleverness, they will respond with cleverness of their own, and those above and below will scheme against and harm one another. The sages value De; the world values cleverness. De and cleverness are fundamentally opposed, but cleverness accords with only a narrow range, while De accords with a vast one.

The rivers and seas become the places where all streams converge because they are good at staying low; that is why they can contain all the streams. When sages wish to stand above the people, they speak with humility; when they wish to lead the people, they place themselves behind them in their actions. Thus, when sages occupy high positions, the people do not feel oppressed; when they lead, no one can harm them. For this reason, people throughout the world are glad to promote them and do not grow tired of them. Because they do not contend with others, no one under Heaven can contend with them.

王之为言天下所归往也。处,上声,下同。乐,入声不能害。是以天下乐推而不厌。以其不争,故天下莫能与之争。 王之为言天下所归往也。处,上声,下同。乐,入声。 苏注:圣人非欲上人,非欲先人也,盖下之后之,其道不得不上且先1耳。 天下皆谓我道大,似不肖。夫唯大,故似不肖。若肖久矣,其细也夫。我有三宝,宝而持之。一曰慈,二曰俭,三曰不敢为天下先。夫慈,故能勇;俭,故能广;不敢为天下先,故能成器长。今舍其慈且勇,舍其俭且广,舍其后且先,死矣。夫慈,以战则胜,以守则固。天将救之,以慈卫之。 肖,似也。夫并音符。长、舍并上声。卫,护也。 苏注:夫道旷然无形,颓然无名,充遍万物,而与物无一相似,此其所以为大也。若似于物,则亦一物耳,而何足大哉?道声。卫,护也。
Interpretation

A “king” is someone to whom all under Heaven turn and whom they support. The character chu in “occupies” is read with the third tone, while le is read with the entering tone and means “gladly” or “willingly.” Because he does not contend with others, everyone under Heaven is glad to put him forward and does not reject him. Since he does not contend, no one under Heaven can contend with him.

Su Shi’s commentary says: The sage does not wish to place himself above everyone else, nor to get ahead of them. He is simply willing to stay below and fall behind. Yet by following this way, he has no choice but to take the highest place and lead the way.

Everyone under Heaven says, “My Dao is vast,” yet it seems unlike any particular thing. It is precisely because it is vast that nothing resembles it. If it resembled something, it would already have become small.

I have three treasures that I have always cherished and guarded. The first is compassion, the second is frugality, and the third is not daring to get ahead of everyone under Heaven. Through compassion, one can be brave; through frugality, one can be generous; by not daring to lead, one can become the chief among all. Now, if one abandons compassion in pursuit of bravery, abandons frugality in pursuit of generosity, and abandons holding back in order to fight for the lead, one will meet with defeat. If you fight with compassion, you will win; if you use it to defend, you will be secure. When Heaven wishes to protect someone, it shields them with compassion.

“Xiao” means “to resemble.” “Fu” is pronounced like “fú.” “Chang” and “she” are both read with the third tone. “Wei” means to guard or defend.

Su Shi’s commentary says: The Dao is vast and boundless, without form or fixed name. It fills all things, yet resembles no particular thing; this is precisely why it is vast. If it resembled something, it would be just one thing among many—how could it be called vast? “Dao” is pronounced like “dǎo”; “wei” means to protect.

苏注:夫道旷然无形,颓然无名,充遍万物,而与物无一相似,此其所以为大也。若似于物,则亦一物耳,而何足大哉?道以不似物为大,故其运而为德,则亦闷然,以钝为利,以退为进,不合于世俗。今夫世俗贵勇敢,尚广大,夸进锐,而吾之所宝则慈忍,俭约,廉退。此三者,皆世之所谓不肖者也。世以勇决为贤,而以慈忍为不及事,不知勇决之易挫,而慈忍之不可胜,其终必至于勇也。世以广大盖物,而以俭约为陋,不知广大之易穷,而俭约之易足,其终必至于广也。世以进锐为能,而以不敢先为耻,不知进锐之多恶于人,而不敢先之以俭约为陋,不知广大之易穷,而俭约之易足,其终必至于广也。世以进锐为能,而以不敢先为耻,不知进锐之多恶于人,而不敢先之乐推于世,其终卒为器长也。盖朴散而为器,圣人用之则为官长。自朴成器,始有属有长矣。勇、广、先三者,人之所共疾也。为众所疾,故常近于死。以慈卫物,物之爱之如父母,虽为之效死而不辞,故可以战,可以守。天之将救是人也,则开其心志,使之无所不慈。无所不慈,则物皆为之卫矣。 善为士者不武,善战者不怒,善胜敌者不争,善用人者其心志,使之无所不慈。无所不慈,则物皆为之卫矣。
Interpretation

The Dao is vast, formless, and impossible to name. It extends throughout all things, yet nothing resembles it. That is why it can be called “great.” If it resembled some particular thing, it would be just one thing among others—how could it be called great?

When the Dao operates and takes shape as De, it too appears deep and reserved: it treats slowness as a strength and yielding as a way forward, and so it runs counter to worldly custom. The world prizes boldness and decisiveness, exalts grand displays, and boasts of pressing ahead with determination. What I cherish instead is compassion and forbearance, simplicity and frugality, humility and noncontention. To the world, all three seem like signs of uselessness.

People think that only boldness and decisiveness count as virtue, and that compassion and forbearance get in the way. They do not understand that bold resolve is easily thwarted, while compassion and forbearance are hard to overcome; in the end, they can bring about true courage. People think that only a grand display can surpass all things, and that simplicity and frugality are shabby. They do not understand that lavish grandeur is easily exhausted, while simplicity and frugality readily bring contentment; in the end, they too can lead to abundance. People think that only striving to be first shows ability, and consider it shameful not to seize the lead. They do not understand that those who always strive to be first invite resentment. Those who do not put themselves ahead of others are more readily chosen by all, and in the end become their leaders.

Once the uncarved block—the original state before shaping—has been divided, it becomes all kinds of implements. When the sage makes use of them, he can become the leader of all. The transformation of the uncarved block into implements gives rise to the distinction between subordinates and superiors. Boldness, grand display, and striving to be first are three ways of acting that people generally dislike. Those who incur the dislike of all often come close to danger. When someone cares for and protects all things with compassion, they love him as they would a parent; they do not refuse even to risk their lives in his service. Thus he can both fight and defend.

When Heaven wishes to aid such a person, it opens his heart and mind, making him compassionate in all things. When compassion fills his heart, all things will protect him.

Those skilled at leading armies do not flaunt their strength or worship force. Those skilled in battle do not give way to anger. Those skilled at defeating an enemy do not engage in hard contention. Those skilled at employing people can open their hearts and minds, making them compassionate in all things. When everyone is compassionate, all things will protect them.

善为士者不武,善战者不怒,善胜敌者不争,善用人者为之下。是谓不争之德,是谓用人之力,是谓配天古之极。 古者车战为士,甲士三人在车上,左执弓,右持矛,中御车掌旗鼓,皆欲其强武。战卒七十二人在车下。盖至争者惟兵,故借之以明不争之德也。罗什曰:心形既空,孰能与无物者争? 苏注:士当以武为本,行之以怯,若以武行武则死矣。圣人不得已而后战,若出于怒,是以我故杀人也。以我故杀人,天必殃之。以吾不争,故能胜彼之争。若皆出于争,则行武则死矣。圣人不得已而后战,若出于怒,是以我故杀人也。以我故杀人,天必殃之。以吾不争,故能胜彼之争。若皆出于争,则未必胜矣。人皆有相上之心,故莫能相为用。诚能下之,则天下皆吾用也。 用兵有言:吾不敢为主而为客,不敢进寸而退尺。是谓行无行,攘无臂,仍无敌,执无兵。祸莫大於轻敌,轻敌几丧吾宝。故抗兵相加,哀者胜矣。
Interpretation

A skilled commander does not flaunt courage or indulge in aggression. A skilled fighter is not quick to anger. One who is skilled at overcoming the enemy does not compete for superiority. One who is skilled at employing others knows how to place themselves below them. This is called the virtue of “not contending,” and it is also called making good use of everyone’s strength. It accords with the Way of Heaven and follows the highest principle passed down since ancient times.

In ancient times, warfare relied chiefly on chariots. Each chariot carried three armored warriors: the man on the left held a bow, the man on the right carried a spear, and the man in the middle drove the chariot and was in charge of the banners and drums. All were expected to be brave and strong. On foot, each chariot was accompanied by seventy-two soldiers. Since warfare is the fiercest form of contest, it is used here to explain the principle of “not contending.” Kumarajiva said, “When mind and body are both empty and still, who could contend with someone who has no self and nothing at all?”

Su Shi’s commentary says: A commander is supposed to make force the foundation of his work, yet should put it into practice with caution and an attitude of restraint. If he relies on force alone and acts arrogantly, he will bring about his own death. The sage fights only when there is no alternative. To send troops out of anger is to kill for one’s own sake. Whoever kills for their own sake will surely incur Heaven’s misfortune. Precisely because I do not contend, I can overcome those who compete for superiority. If everyone acted from a desire to contend, victory would by no means be assured. People all wish to outdo one another, so they cannot work together. If one can truly place oneself below others, then everyone under Heaven can be put to use.

On the use of military force, the ancients had this saying: “I dare not take the initiative in attack, but would rather take the defensive; I dare not advance an inch, but would rather retreat a foot.” This is called acting without forming an attacking posture, raising one’s hand without making a striking gesture, confronting the enemy without contending, and holding a weapon without showing off its power. No calamity is greater than underestimating the enemy; underestimating the enemy nearly makes me lose what I hold most precious. When two armies meet and their forces are evenly matched, the side that fights with grief in its heart and a sense of necessity can prevail.

用兵有言,古兵家有此言也。行,上如字,下户刚反,言行列也。仍,就也,《诗》曰:仍执丑虏。兵,五兵,戈、矛、受、戟、干兵家有此言也。行,上如字,下户刚反,言行列也。仍,就也,《诗》曰:仍执丑虏。兵,五兵,戈、矛、受、戟、干也。《说文》云:拱手执斤曰兵。几,平声。丧,去也。抗,举也。林希逸云:此章全是借战事以喻道,推此则书中设喻处其例甚明。 苏注:主,造事者也。客,应敌者也。进者,有意于争者也。退者,无意于争者也。苟无意于争,则虽在军旅,如无臂可攘,无敌可因,无兵可执,而安有用兵之咎耶?圣人以慈为宝,轻敌则轻战,轻战则轻杀人,丧其所以为慈矣。两敌相加,而吾出于不得已则有哀心,哀心见而天人助之,虽歌不胜,不可得也。 吾言耶?圣人以慈为宝,轻敌则轻战,轻战则轻杀人,丧其所以为慈矣。两敌相加,而吾出于不得已则有哀心,哀心见而天人助之,虽歌不胜,不可得也。 吾言甚易知,甚易行。天下莫能知,莫能行。言有宗,事有君。夫惟无知,是以不我知也。知我者希,则我贵矣。是以圣人被褐怀玉。 宗者,族之总也。道者,事之总也。
Interpretation

An ancient saying from the military strategists goes: “When marching, the commanding general should take the guest’s position—the position that responds to the enemy—rather than the host’s position, which initiates trouble. In marching, one should yield a step rather than press forward. In this way, it is as though there were no arm to swing, no enemy to use for leverage, and no weapon to wield.”

The “five weapons” mentioned here are weapons such as the dagger-axe, spear, staff, halberd, and shield. “Holding a weapon in both hands is called a weapon” explains the phrase “the five weapons.” The character ji is read with a level tone; sang means “to lose,” and kang means “to raise.”

Lin Xiyi says this chapter uses warfare to explain the Dao. This also shows that other chapters in the Laozi that use events as metaphors can be understood in the same way.

Su Shi’s commentary says: “‘Host’ means the side that initiates an action; ‘guest’ means the side that responds. Those who attack first have the desire to win; those who yield have no wish to contend. Without a desire to contend, even in the midst of an army one will not act as though one had an arm to swing, treat the enemy as someone to exploit for advantage, or take up weapons to fight. How, then, could one commit the errors of warfare?”

The sage regards compassion as a treasure. To slight the enemy makes it easy to rush into war; rushing into war makes it easy to kill recklessly, and so compassion is lost. When two armies clash, if we truly have no choice but to fight, we should still feel pity in our hearts. When that pity is made manifest, we receive the support of Heaven, Earth, and the people. Even so, we must not casually assume that we will prevail.

“My words are easy to understand and easy to put into practice, yet no one under Heaven understands them or puts them into practice. Words have their source; actions have their governing principle. Because people do not understand this source, they do not understand me. Those who understand me are few, and so I am esteemed. For this reason, the sage wears coarse cloth, yet keeps jade hidden in his breast.”

“Ancestral source” is the ultimate origin of a clan; the Dao is the ultimate root of all things.

苏注:道之大,复性而足。而性之妙,见于起居饮食之间耳。圣人指此以示人,岂不易知乎?人能体此以应物,岂不易行乎?然世常苏注:道之大,复性而足。而性之妙,见于起居饮食之间耳。圣人指此以示人,岂不易知乎?人能体此以应物,岂不易行乎?然世常患日用而不知,知且不能,而况行之乎?言者,道之筌也。事者,道之迹也。使道可以言尽,则听言而足矣,可以事见,则考事而足矣。唯言不能尽,事不能见,非舍言而求其宗,遗事而求其君,不可得也。盖古之圣人无思无为,而有漠然不自然不自知者存焉,此则思虑所不及,是以终莫吾知也。使为众人所能知,亦不足贵矣。被褐怀玉者,圣人外与人同,而中独异也。 知不知,上;不知知,病。夫唯病病,是以不病。圣人之不病也,以其病病,是以不病。 苏注:道非思虑之所及,故不可知。然方其未知,则非知无以入也,及其既知而存知,则病矣。故知而不知者上,不知而知者病。既不可不知,又不可知,苏注:道非思虑之所及,故不可知。然方其未知,则非知无以入也,及其既知而存知,则病矣。故知而不知者上,不知而知者病。既不可不知,又不可知,唯知知为病者,久而病自去矣。
Interpretation

Su Shi’s commentary says: The Dao is vast because restoring one’s original nature is already complete in itself; the subtlety of nature, meanwhile, appears in the routines of daily life, including eating and drinking. When the sages point this out to enlighten the world, is it not easy to understand? If people could respond to things in accordance with their nature, would that not be easy to do? Yet people often put the Dao to use in everyday life without knowing it. If they cannot even recognize it, how much less can they put it into practice?

Words are only tools for expressing the Dao, and events are only traces of its appearance. If the Dao could be fully expressed in words, then understanding the words would be enough; if it could be clearly seen in events, then examining events would be enough. But words cannot exhaust it, nor can the Dao be fully revealed through events. So one must go beyond words to seek the source, and beyond the surface of events to find what governs them, before one can gain any understanding. The ancient sages did not deliberately think or act, yet they attained a state that was deep, wholly natural, and beyond even their own awareness. This state lies beyond the reach of thought, so in the end no one could truly understand them. If everyone could understand them easily, they would not be worthy of such esteem. The phrase “wearing coarse cloth and carrying jade within” means that the sages appear outwardly like ordinary people, yet possess an inward Virtue unlike theirs. “Coarse cloth” refers to rough clothing; “jade” is a metaphor for precious Virtue.

To know without clinging to one’s knowledge is insight; not knowing yet believing that one knows is a failing. Only by recognizing this failing as a failing can one avoid being troubled by it. The sages are free of this failing precisely because they know that clinging to “I understand” is itself a failing.

Su Shi’s commentary says: The Dao cannot be fully grasped by thought, so one cannot claim to have understood it completely. Yet before a person has gained insight, they must still begin with knowledge. Once they have gained some understanding, however, holding fast to “I already know” becomes a failing. Thus, to know without clinging to knowledge is insight; not knowing yet believing that one knows is a failing. The Dao cannot be left entirely unrecognized, but neither can recognition be treated as the destination. Only by seeing that clinging to “knowing” is itself a failing can this failing gradually fade over time.

笔乘:道以知入,以不知化。知即释氏之知无也,不知即释氏之无知也。始以知无遣其有,随以不知遣其知?万法归无,无亦不立中非上而何?彼於虚空之中横生意见,清净之内忽起山河,捏目生华,迷头认影,则病矣。凡有知皆妄也,凡有妄皆病也。学者方狃以为玄览,宝而持之,病奚从瘳乎?圣人之不能废知,犹夫人也,而知不为病者,知知之为病故耳。知其为病,则勿药而病瘳矣。知不知上,所谓生而无生,真2性湛然也夫人也,而知不为病者,知知之为病故耳。知其为病,则勿药而病瘳矣。知不知上,所谓生而无生,真2性湛然也。不知知病,所谓无生而生,业果宛然也。唯其病病,是以不病,所谓知幻即离,不作方便也。 民不畏威,则大威至矣。无狭其所居,无厌其所生。夫唯不厌,是以不厌。是以圣人自知不自见,自爱不自贵,故去彼取此。 威畏古通用。人不畏其所当畏,则大可畏者至矣。下文皆畏其所当畏之事。狭,胡夹反,一作狎。厌,於艳反。 苏注:夫性自有威,高明光大,赫然物畏其所当畏之事。狭,胡夹反,一作狎。厌,於艳反。
Interpretation

The Bicheng says: To attain the Dao, one must begin with “knowing” and ultimately reach the transformed state of “not knowing.” “Knowing” here is like the Buddhist teaching that all things are without inherent nature; “not knowing” is like non-discriminating awareness. First, use “knowing that things are empty” to undo attachment to what exists; then use “not knowing” to undo attachment to knowing. All phenomena return to emptiness, but emptiness itself should not be grasped as something real. Is this not the highest state?

If someone conjures up ideas out of thin air, or suddenly sees mountains and rivers in a state of purity, it is like seeing phantom flowers when the eyes are irritated, or losing one’s head and mistaking a shadow for oneself. This is illness. Clinging to knowing is delusion, and delusion is illness. Yet students take these experiences for profound insight, cherish them, and refuse to let them go. How can the illness be cured?

The sage, like an ordinary person, cannot be entirely without “knowing.” But his knowing does not become an illness, because he understands that attachment to knowing is itself an illness. Once he recognizes it as illness, no separate remedy is needed for it to heal. “Knowing without clinging to knowing” is the highest attainment: one is alive without clinging to life, and one’s true nature remains clear and still. By contrast, failing to recognize attachment to knowing as an illness is to claim there is no birth while still clinging to life; karmic consequences remain unmistakable. Precisely because one can recognize illness as illness, one is not trapped by it. This is what it means to “recognize an illusion and thereby leave it”; no other method need be devised.

When the people do not fear what they ought to fear, a greater threat will come upon them. Do not make your dwelling cramped, and do not grow weary of your life. Because you do not grow weary of life, you will not invite weariness upon yourself. Thus the sage understands himself but does not make a show of himself; he cherishes himself but does not exalt his own worth. So he lets go of the latter and chooses the former.

In ancient texts, “might” and “fear” can be written with the same character. If people do not fear what they ought to fear, more fearsome consequences will follow. The statements below all concern things that ought to be feared. The character “narrow” is read “hú jiā qiè”; some editions write “intimate.” The character “weary” is read “yú yàn qiè.”

Su Shi’s commentary says: Human nature possesses its own majestic radiance. It is exalted and expansive, and shines so manifestly that all things revere it.

苏注:夫性自有威,高明光大,赫然物莫能加,此所谓大威也。人常患溺于众,妄畏生死,而惮得丧。万物之威,杂然乘之,终身惴惴之不暇,虽有大威而不自知也。苟诚知之,一生死,齐得丧,坦然无所怖畏,则大威烨然见于前矣。性之大,可以包络天地。彼不知者,以四肢九窍为己也,守之而不厌,是以见不出视,闻不出听,蕞然其甚陋也,故教之曰无狭其所居。彼知之者,知性之大而吾生之狭也,则愀然厌之,欲脱而不得,不知有厌有慕之方囿于物也,故教之曰无厌其所生。夫唯圣人,知性之大而吾生之狭也,则愀然厌之,欲脱而不得,不知有厌有慕之方囿于物也,故教之曰无厌其所生。夫唯圣人不狭不厌,与人同生,而与道同居,无广狭净秽之辨,既不厌生,而后知生之无可厌也。圣人虽自知之而不自见3,虽自爱之而不自贵以眩人,恐人之有厌有慕也。厌慕之心未忘,则犹有畏也,畏去,而后大威至也。 勇于敢则杀,勇于不敢则活。此两者,或利或害。天之所恶,孰知其故?是以圣人犹难之。天之道,不争而善胜,不言而善应,不召而自来,繟然而善谋。天之道,不争而善谋4。天网恢恢,疏而不失。
Interpretation

Su’s commentary says: Human nature already possesses a kind of power. It is lofty and bright, vast and full, and shines with such brilliance that nothing can surpass it. This is what is called “great power.” People are often confused by the multitude of things. They fear life and death without reason, and worry about gain and loss. The forces of external things press in from every side, keeping people anxious and unsettled throughout their lives, occupied with worry and fear. Though their nature holds this great power, they do not know it is there.

If people truly understand this, they can regard life and death as one, treat gain and loss as the same, and remain calm and unafraid. Then the great power of their nature will shine forth. Human nature is vast enough to contain Heaven and Earth. Those who do not understand this take their four limbs and nine openings—the eyes, ears, nose, mouth, and other bodily apertures—to be themselves. They cling to this body and are never satisfied, so they cannot see beyond the limits of sight or hear beyond the limits of hearing. Their outlook is truly narrow. Thus Laozi teaches people not to regard the place where they dwell as cramped.

Those who understand that their nature is vast while the form of their individual life is small may grieve over and reject it, wishing to escape it but finding they cannot. They do not realize that rejection and longing alike leave people constrained by external things. Thus Laozi teaches people not to reject the life in which they find themselves. Only the sage neither considers life small nor rejects it. The sage lives as other people do, yet accords with the Dao, making no distinction between vastness and narrowness, purity and defilement. Only by not rejecting life can one understand that life is, in its nature, nothing to reject.

Although the sage understands this, they do not make a point of displaying themselves. Although they cherish themselves, they do not exalt themselves or show off to others, fearing this might stir in others a desire to reject life or a longing to escape beyond it. So long as rejection and longing remain, fear remains as well. When fear subsides, the great power of one’s nature will appear.

Those who dare to force their strength are easily killed; those who dare to restrain themselves and avoid rash action can preserve their lives. These two kinds of courage have different outcomes: one brings benefit, the other calamity. What Heaven’s Way abhors—who can know why? For this reason, even the sage treats the matter with caution.

Heaven’s Way does not contend with the myriad things, yet excels at overcoming them. It issues no commands, yet excels at responding. It does not summon things, yet they return of their own accord. It seems unhurried and at ease, yet excels at arranging and planning. Heaven’s Way does not contend, yet excels at bringing all things to fulfillment. It is like a vast net: its meshes seem wide apart, yet nothing slips through.

杀犹死也。利谓活,害谓杀。恶,去声。繟音阐,舒缓也。王作坦,严作默,不如作繟为5长。盖默则重不言,坦则近不争也。 苏注:勇于敢则死,勇于不敢则生,,去声。繟音阐,舒缓也。王作坦,严作默,不如作繟为5长。盖默则重不言,坦则近不争也。 苏注:勇于敢则死,勇于不敢则生,此物理之常也。然而敢者或以得生,不敢者或以得死,世遂侥幸其或然,而忽其常理。夫天道之远,其有一或然者,孰知其好恶之所从来哉?故虽圣人犹以常为正,其于勇敢未尝不难之。列子曰:迎天意,揣利害,不如其已。患天道之难知,是以历陈之。不与物争于一时,要于终胜之而已。天何言哉?四时行焉,百物生焉,未有求而不应者也。神之格思,不可度思,矧可射思,夫谁召之哉?繟然舒缓,若无所营而其谋度非人之所及也。世以耳目观天,见其一曲而不睹其大全。有以善而得祸,恶而得福者,未有不疑天网之疏而多失也。惟能要其终始而尽其变化,然后知其恢恢广大,虽疏而不失也。
Interpretation

“Benefit” means survival, while “harm” means death. Here, “evil” is pronounced with a falling tone. The word “chan” means calm and unhurried. Some write it as “tan,” while others write it as “mo.” Of these, “chan” is the better choice, since it conveys calm ease. “Mo” emphasizes silence, while “tan” comes closer to non-contention.

Su Shi’s commentary says: Those who are bold enough to act recklessly often invite death; those who are bold enough to exercise restraint and avoid rash action can preserve their lives. This is the usual pattern of things. Yet sometimes the reckless survive, while the cautious and yielding meet their deaths. People then pin their hopes on such exceptions and overlook the usual pattern.

The Way of Heaven—the laws by which nature operates—is profound and difficult to fathom. Even when some outcome happens by chance, people may not know why. The sage therefore takes the ordinary pattern as a guide and remains wary of reckless risk-taking. The Liezi says, “Rather than speculate about Heaven’s intentions and calculate gains and losses, it is better to stop here.” It is precisely because the Way of Heaven is hard to see through that this principle must be explained again and again: there is no need to contend over a momentary win or loss; it is enough to prevail in the end.

Heaven does not speak, yet the seasons turn and all things grow. People make requests, and often receive a response. When spirits descend, their coming is impossible to predict—how could one compel them to appear? Who could summon them? The Way of Heaven seems calm and effortless, revealing no plans or arrangements, yet its workings lie beyond the reach of human intelligence.

People judge the Way of Heaven only through what they see and hear, and so perceive only fragments, never the whole. Sometimes the virtuous suffer misfortune while the wicked prosper. People then suspect that the Way of Heaven is like a net with wide gaps, often letting due retribution slip through. Only by seeing the full course of events and all their changes can one understand that the Way of Heaven is vast and boundless: its mesh may seem wide, yet nothing truly escapes it.

民常不畏死,奈何得祸,恶而得福者,未有不疑天网之疏而多失也。惟能要其终始而尽其变化,然后知其恢恢广大,虽疏而不失也。 民常不畏死,奈何以死惧之。若使人常畏死而为奇者,吾得执而杀之,孰敢?常有司杀者杀,而代司杀者杀,是代大匠斲。夫代大匠斲,希有不伤其手矣。 斲,陟角反。 苏注:政烦刑重,民无所措手足,则常不畏死,虽以死惧之,无益也。民安于政,常乐生畏死,然后执其诡异乱群者而杀之,孰敢不服哉?司杀者,天也。方世之治,而有诡异乱群之人恣行于其间,则天之所弃也。而吾杀之,则是天杀之,而非我也。非天之所杀而吾自杀之,是代司杀者杀也。代大匠斲则伤其手矣,代司杀者杀则及其身矣。非我也。非天之所杀而吾自杀之,是代司杀者杀也。代大匠斲则伤其手矣,代司杀者杀则及其身矣。 民之饥,以其上食税之多也,是以饥。民之难治,以其上之有为也,是以难治。民之轻死,以其生生之厚也,是以轻死。夫唯无以生为者,是贤于贵生。 税,租也。纯甫云:无以生为者贤于贵生,即吾无吾身,吾有何患之意。此章之言由粗及精,要归其净于此耳。 苏注:上以有为导民,民亦有为应之,故事多而难治。上以利欲先民,民亦争厚其生,故虽死而求利不厌。贵生之极必至于轻死,惟无以生为,而生自全矣。
Interpretation

The people often do not fear death. How, then, can rulers use the death penalty to intimidate them? If the people all feared death, then when someone behaved strangely and stirred up disorder, I could seize and execute him. Who would still dare to rebel? But the true authority over life and death belongs to Heaven. If, in a time of peace throughout the realm, someone still acts recklessly and causes disorder, that person is one Heaven intends to abandon. When I execute him, I am acting in accord with Heaven’s will. If Heaven does not intend someone to be executed, but I kill him on my own authority, I am taking the place of the one who governs life and death. Few who presume to take a master carpenter’s place in cutting and shaping wood avoid injuring their own hands. Presuming to exercise the power over life and death will likewise bring misfortune upon oneself.

The term “zhuo” is pronounced “zhi jiao fan” and means to cut and shape.

The people go hungry because the taxes imposed by their rulers are too heavy; that is why they starve. The people are difficult to govern because their rulers issue too many orders and force things into action; that is why they are difficult to govern. The people take death lightly because their rulers place excessive value on living and encourage them to pursue their livelihoods; as a result, people come to fear death less. Only those who do not place too much emphasis on managing and pursuing life can surpass those who value life above all else.

The phrase “not making a livelihood one’s aim” means not deliberately pursuing and managing one’s life. Su Zhe argues that when rulers guide the people through various undertakings, the people compete to imitate them, making affairs complicated and difficult to govern. When rulers lead by pursuing profit and desire, the people compete to seek a life of abundance, and may refuse to stop even at the cost of their lives. Valuing life too much may ultimately lead people to take death lightly; by not deliberately pursuing a livelihood, life can instead be preserved.

人之生也柔民亦争厚其生,故虽死而求利不厌。贵生之极必至于轻死,惟无以生为,而生自全矣。 人之生也柔弱,其死也坚强。草木之生也柔脆,其死也枯槁。故坚强者死之徒,柔弱者生之徒。是以兵强则不胜,木强则共。强大处下,柔弱处上。 脆,软也。徒,类也。合手曰共。商桑谷生于朝,七日大共。秦伯怒蹇叔曰:墓木拱矣。皆合拱也。董音如字,言人共代之也。处,上声。 苏注:冲气在焉,则体无坚强之病。至理在焉,则事无坚强之累。兵以义胜者,非强也,强而不义,其败必速。木自拱把以上,必伐矣。物之常理,精者在上,粗者在下,其精必柔弱,其粗必强大。 天之道,其犹张弓乎?高者抑之,下者举之,速。木自拱把以上,必伐矣。物之常理,精者在上,粗者在下,其精必柔弱,其粗必强大。 天之道,其犹张弓乎?高者抑之,下者举之,有余者损之,不足者补之。天之道,损有余而补不足,人之道则不然,损不足而奉有余。孰能以有余奉天下?唯有道者。是以圣人为而不恃,成功而不居,其不欲见贤耶?
Interpretation

While alive, the human body is soft; after death, it becomes stiff. Plants and trees are tender as they grow, but dry and hard once they wither and die. Thus, hardness and strength belong to death, while softness and weakness belong to life. An army that exalts its strength will struggle to win; a tree that grows thick and hard is easily cut down. What is strong and mighty is placed below, while what is soft and weak is placed above.

Here, “embrace” means bringing both arms together, describing a trunk thick enough to encircle with one’s arms. “A handspan around” likewise refers to a tree that has grown thick enough to be encircled by one’s hands.

The operation of Heaven’s Dao is like drawing a bow: the high end is pressed down, and the low end is raised up. What is in excess is reduced; what is insufficient is replenished. Heaven’s Dao reduces what is in excess and adds to what is insufficient. Human ways, by contrast, often do the opposite: they take from those who lack and provide for those who have plenty. Who can use their own surplus to provide for all under Heaven? Only one who has attained the Dao.

Thus, the sage takes action without relying on his own actions. He accomplishes things without claiming them as his own. He acts this way because he does not wish to display his own excellence.

抑之举之二句言张弓,有余不足二句言天道。凡弛弓俯其体,则弣在上,弰向下。张之而仰其体,则弣向下,弰在上。是抑附之高者,使之向下,举弰之下者,使之在上。天之损有余,如抑其弣而使之下;其补不足,如举弣在上,弰向下。张之而仰其体,则弣向下,弰在上。是抑附之高者,使之向下,举弰之下者,使之在上。天之损有余,如抑其弣而使之下;其补不足,如举其弰而使之高。见,贤遍反。 苏注:张弓上筋,弛弓上角,故以况天之抑高举下。天无私故均,人多私故不均。有道者赡足万物而不辞,既以为人己愈有,既以予人己愈多。非有道者,无以堪此。为而恃,成而处,则贤见于世。贤见于世,则是以有余自奉也。 天下莫柔弱于水,而攻坚强者莫之能先,以其无以易之也。故柔愈多。非有道者,无以堪此。为而恃,成而处,则贤见于世。贤见于世,则是以有余自奉也。 天下莫柔弱于水,而攻坚强者莫之能先,以其无以易之也。故柔之胜刚,弱之胜强,天下莫不知,莫能行。是以圣人云:受国之垢,是谓社稷主;受国之不祥,是谓天下王。正言若反。 苏注:正言合道而反俗,俗以受垢为辱,受不祥为殃故也。
Interpretation

“Pressing down” and “raising up” refer to drawing a bow; “diminishing what is excessive” and “making up what is lacking” refer to the Dao of Heaven.

When a bow is relaxed, its body curves downward, with the grip—the middle of the bow—above and the tips at either end below. When the bow is drawn and raised, the grip points downward and the tips upward. This is like pressing down what is high and raising up what is low. The Dao of Heaven diminishes what is excessive, as if pressing down the upper part of the bow, and makes up what is lacking, as if raising the bow’s ends. Here, “see” is read as “appear,” meaning to become manifest.

Su Zhe’s commentary says: When a bow is drawn, its string is above; when it is relaxed, its horns are above. Thus the bow serves as a metaphor for the Dao of Heaven pressing down what is high and lifting up what is low. The Dao of Heaven has no partiality, and so it brings all things into balance. People often act from private motives, and so they cannot bring things into balance. A person who has the Dao nourishes all things without holding back. By giving to others, they become more abundant themselves; by giving things away, they become richer. Those without the Dao cannot bear to act this way. If you claim credit for what you have done and lay claim to the results once the work is complete, your abilities will become visible to the world. When your abilities are displayed to the world, you are keeping your surplus for your own enjoyment.

Nothing under Heaven is softer or weaker than water, yet nothing surpasses it in overcoming hard and powerful things, for nothing else can take its place. Thus no one under Heaven is unaware that the soft overcomes the hard and the weak overcomes the strong, yet no one can truly put this into practice. So the sage says, “One who can bear a state’s humiliation is fit to be its ruler; one who can bear a state’s calamities is fit to be the king of all under Heaven.” Words that accord with the right way often sound as though they mean the opposite.

Su Zhe’s commentary says: Words that accord with the Dao often run counter to worldly ideas. The world regards bearing humiliation as disgraceful and bearing calamity as misfortune; that is why these words seem to mean the opposite.

和大怨,必有余怨,安可以为善?是以圣人执左契,而不责于人。故有德司契,无德司彻。天道无亲,常与善人。 契,苦计反。彻,彻法也,直列反。 苏注:夫怨生于妄,而妄出于性,知性者不见诸妄,而又何怨乎?今不知除其本,而欲和其末,故外虽和而内未忘也。契之有左右,所以为信而息争也。圣人与人均有是性,人方以妄为常,驰骛于争夺之场,而不知性之未始少妄也契之有左右,所以为信而息争也。圣人与人均有是性,人方以妄为常,驰骛于争夺之场,而不知性之未始少妄也。是以圣人以其性示人,使之除妄以复性。待其妄尽而性复,未有不廓然自得,如右契之合左,不待责之而自服也。然则虽有大怨慧,将涣然冰解,知其本非有矣,而安用和之?彼无德者,乃欲人人而通之,则亦劳而无功矣。彻,通也。天道无私,惟善人则与之。契之无私也。 小国寡民,使有什伯之器而不用,使民重死而不远徙。虽有舟车,无所乘之;虽有甲兵,无所陈之;使民复结绳而用之。甘其食,美其服,安其居,乐其俗。邻国相望,鸡犬之音相闻,民至老死,不相往来。
Interpretation

How can it be considered truly proper to resolve deep resentment if traces of anger remain? Thus, the sage holds the left half of a tally—a token used in ancient times to verify a claim—but does not use it to demand anything from others. A person of high virtue keeps faith as if holding a tally, without pressing others to repay what they owe. A person lacking virtue, by contrast, pursues every claim according to the rules. Heaven’s Dao shows no favoritism; it consistently supports the good.

Su Shi’s commentary says: Resentment arises from deluded thoughts, and deluded thoughts come from losing sight of one’s nature. Those who truly know their nature are not obscured by deluded thoughts, and so have no resentment. If one does not dispel deluded thoughts at their root and only tries to smooth over outward conflict, the parties may be reconciled on the surface while resentment remains in their hearts.

A tally has two halves, originally used to establish trust and settle disputes. Sages and ordinary people share the same nature, but people often take deluded thoughts to be normal, busily competing for advantage without realizing that their nature has never truly been altered by those thoughts. The sage uses their own nature to awaken others, helping them dispel deluded thoughts and return to their nature. When delusion has faded and nature is restored, people suddenly understand, like two halves of a tally naturally joining together. There is no need to press them or demand an explanation; they will be convinced from within. Thus even deep resentment dissolves like ice and snow. Once people understand that resentment has no root, there is no need to deliberately reconcile it. Those lacking virtue, however, try to settle every matter completely, but their efforts come to nothing. Here, “pursue” means to proceed item by item and demand repayment. Heaven’s Dao is impartial and helps only the good; the tally’s function of establishing trust is impartial as well.

Make the state small and its people few. Even if they possess various tools, do not use them. Let the people value their lives and not move to distant places. Though there are boats and carts, there is no need to ride in them; though there are weapons and armor, do not display or use them. Let the people return to keeping records by tying knots in cords. They find their food delicious, their clothing pleasing, their homes comfortable, and their customs delightful. Neighboring states can see one another, and the sounds of chickens and dogs can be heard across the border, yet the people grow old and die without visiting one another.

《汉书》诏天下吏舍无得置什器,颜师古注云:五人为伍,十人为什,则共器物。故通谓什伍之具为什物。不用者,无往来,免储待,省徭役也。舟舆甲兵,举其重者言之十人为什,则共器物。故通谓什伍之具为什物。不用者,无往来,免储待,省徭役也。舟舆甲兵,举其重者言之。乐,入声。望,平声。相望,相闻,近也。至老死,久也。近而且久,不相往来者,各足故也。道足则无事咨询,财足则不相乞假。 苏注:老子生于衰周,文胜俗弊,将以无为救之。故于书之终,言其所志,愿得小国寡民以试焉,而不可得耳。民各安其分,则小有材者不求用于世。什伯人之器,则材堪什夫伯夫之长者也。事少民朴,虽结绳足矣。内足而外无所慕,故以其所有为美,以其所处为乐,而不复求也。民物繁伙而不相求,则彼此皆足故也。 民朴,虽结绳足矣。内足而外无所慕,故以其所有为美,以其所处为乐,而不复求也。民物繁伙而不相求,则彼此皆足故也。 信言不美,美言不信。善言不辩,辩言不善。知者不博,博者不知。圣人不积,既以为人己愈有,既以与人己愈多。天之道利而不害,圣人之道为而不争。 为人之为,去声。
Interpretation

The Book of Han records an edict forbidding officials from keeping “communal equipment” in their residences. Yan Shigu explained that five people formed a wu, and ten formed a shi; objects used in common by the members of a wu or shi were called “communal goods.” Here the term broadly refers to items shared by the members of these groups. “If they are not used” means that, without such equipment, there would be no need for people to come and go, and matters such as storing supplies, providing provisions, and performing corvée labor could also be avoided. Boats, carts, armor, and weapons are examples of more important items. The character le is read with the falling tone, and wang with the level tone. “Within sight and hearing of one another” means that people live very close together, while “until old age and death” indicates a long span of time. People live nearby yet do not visit one another even until old age and death because each is already content: when they are self-sufficient in understanding, they have no need to seek instruction from others; when they are self-sufficient in material goods, they need not borrow from anyone.

Su Shi’s commentary says: Laozi lived during the declining years of the Zhou dynasty, when society prized elaborate ornamentation and customs were steadily deteriorating. He hoped to remedy this situation through Wuwei (non-action). At the end of the Laozi, he therefore stated his aspiration: he hoped for a small state with a small population, where he could put these ideas into practice, but he never had the opportunity. When the people each attend to their proper place, even those with ability will not be eager to enter official service in search of employment. “Equipment for ten or a hundred people” refers to someone whose abilities would qualify them to lead ten or a hundred people. When affairs are few and the people’s customs are simple, keeping records with knotted cords is enough. A fulfilled heart does not envy things beyond itself; people are content with what they have and at ease where they live, without seeking anything outside. Even when the people and goods are abundant, they do not seek things from one another because each side is already satisfied.

Truthful words are not necessarily pleasing to the ear, and pleasing words are not necessarily true. Those skilled in speaking do not rely on argument to prevail, and those fond of argument are not necessarily skilled in speaking. The truly wise do not boast of extensive knowledge, and those with extensive knowledge are not necessarily truly wise. The sage does not hoard for himself: the more he helps others, the more he has; the more he gives to others, the richer he becomes. The Way of Heaven benefits all things and does not harm them. The sage’s way is to act, yet not contend with others for victory. Here, “acting for others” means doing things on their behalf; wei is read with the falling tone.

苏注:信则为实而已,故不必美。美则为观而已,故不必信。以善为主则不求辩,以辩为主则未必善。有一以贯之,则无所用博。博学而日益者,未必知道也。圣人抱一而已,他无所积也。然施其所能以为人,推其所有以与人为主则不求辩,以辩为主则未必善。有一以贯之,则无所用博。博学而日益者,未必知道也。圣人抱一而已,他无所积也。然施其所能以为人,推其所有以与人,人有尽而一无尽,然后知一之为贵也。势可以利人,则可以害人矣。力足以为之,则足以争之矣。,能利能害而未尝害,能为能争而未尝争,此天与圣人大过人而为万物宗者也。凡此皆老子之所以为书,与其所以为道之大略也,故于终篇复言之。
Interpretation

Su Shi’s commentary says: What is genuine is real; there is no need to make a deliberate show of goodness. Goodness is only an outward impression and is not necessarily genuine. If one makes doing good the priority, there is no need to argue; if one makes argument the priority, one may not be following the good Dao. Grasp one fundamental principle and use it to make sense of all things, and there is no need to pursue learning without end. Those who continually increase their knowledge do not necessarily truly understand the Dao. The sage holds fast to this fundamental principle and accumulates nothing else.

Still, the sage uses what they can do to help others and shares what they have with them. What people possess is ultimately limited, while the fundamental principle is inexhaustible. Only by understanding this can one know the value of holding fast to that principle.

Power can be used to benefit others or to harm them; strength can accomplish things, but it can also give rise to conflict. The sage has the power to benefit or harm others, yet never harms anyone; has the strength to act or compete, yet never competes. This is why Heaven and the sage surpass ordinary people and become worthy of the reverence of all things.

These points, in broad terms, explain the purpose for which Laozi wrote this book and expounded the Dao. That is why they are discussed again at the very end.

笔乘:或曰:老氏之为书,使人得以受而味焉,则近乎美;穷万物之理而无不至,则近乎辩;察万事之变而无不该,则近乎博。然不知其有信而不美,善而不辩,知而不博者存,何也?则以五千言所言,皆不积之道耳。不积者,心无所住之谓也。夫积而不积,则言而无言矣。言而无言,故非不为人也,而不积之道耳。不积者,心无所住之谓也。夫积而不积,则言而无言矣。言而无言,故非不为人也,而未尝分己之有,非不予人也,而未尝损己之多,斯何恶於辩且博哉?苟非不积之道,而第执其意见以与天下争,则多言数穷者流,非天道也。天之道利而不害,圣人之道为而不争,学者于此而刳心焉,老氏之书亦思过半矣。故曰教而无教,何必杜口於毗耶?言乃忘言,自可了心於柱下,读者其勉聃哉。 老子翼卷之四竟 1先:原作『尤』,据万历本改。 2真:原作『异』,据万历本改。 3不自见:疑后脱『以示人』三字。 4天之道,不争而善谋:此句疑衍。 5繟为:此二字原脱,据万历本补。 老子翼卷之五 附录
Interpretation

Some say that the book Laozi lets people accept its teachings and reflect on them again and again; its principles approach the beautiful. It probes the principles of all things and reaches everywhere, approaching eloquence. It sees through the changes of all affairs and embraces them all, approaching breadth of learning. Yet people do not know that the Laozi also reaches another level: its principles are true and trustworthy, but it does not prevail through eloquence; its insight is exceptional, but it does not show off in argument; its wisdom is profound, but it does not pursue wide learning and forceful memorization. Why is this so? Because all that is expressed in the Laozi’s five thousand words concerns not accumulating and not clinging.

“Not accumulating” means that the mind clings to nothing. Even when something has been accumulated, one does not claim it as one’s own. This is to speak as though one had not spoken. To speak as though one had not spoken does not mean refusing to teach others; it means following the principle of nonattachment. Not accumulating means that the mind clings to nothing. To accumulate without claiming what one has gathered as one’s own is to speak without speaking. Speaking without speaking does not mean failing to consider others, nor does it mean refusing to give to them. It means giving without feeling that one’s own store has diminished, and sharing without feeling that one’s abundance has suffered a loss. What, then, is there to dislike about eloquence and broad learning?

If one does not understand the principle of nonattachment, but instead clings to one’s own views and argues with everyone under Heaven, one will end up among those who talk at length only to meet repeated frustration. This does not accord with the Dao of Heaven. The Dao of Heaven benefits all things and harms none; the way of the sage acts without contending with others. If scholars can open their minds in this way and let go of their fixations, they will already have understood most of the Laozi.

So one may teach others without thinking of oneself as a teacher. Why, then, must one keep silent like Vimalakīrti of Vaiśālī? One may speak without clinging to words, and so, like Laozi, the Archivist at the Pillar, naturally come to understand the Great Dao in stillness. Readers should strive to grasp the thought of Lao Dan.

End of Volume Four of The Wings of the Laozi

Notes on textual collation: Note 1 says that the original reads “especially,” which has been changed to “first” on the basis of the Wanli edition. Note 2 says that the original reads “different,” which has been changed to “true” on the basis of the Wanli edition. Note 3 suggests that the three characters “to show others” have been omitted after “does not display himself.” Note 4 suggests that the sentence “The Dao of Heaven does not contend and is skilled at planning” is extraneous. Note 5 says that the two characters “relaxed and easy” were missing from the original and have been supplied from the Wanli edition.

Volume Five of The Wings of the Laozi

Appendix

The “Biography of Laozi” in the Records of the Grand Historian says: Laozi was from Quren village in Lixiang, Ku County, in the state of Chu. His surname was Li and his personal name was Er.

《史记□老子列传》曰:老子者,楚苦县厉乡曲仁里人也,姓李氏,名耳不争而善谋:此句疑衍。 5繟为:此二字原脱,据万历本补。 老子翼卷之五 附录 《史记□老子列传》曰:老子者,楚苦县厉乡曲仁里人也,姓李氏,名耳,伯阳,谧曰聃。周守藏室之史也。孔子适周,将问礼于老子。老子曰:子所言者,其人与骨皆已朽矣,独其言在耳。且君子得其时则驾,不得其时则蓬累而行。吾闻之,良贾深藏若虚,君子盛德,容貌若愚。去子之骄气与多欲,态色与淫志,是皆无益於子之身。吾所以告子,若是而已。孔子去,谓弟子曰:鸟,吾知其能飞;鱼,吾知其能游;兽,吾知其能走。走者可以为罔,游者可以为纶,飞者可以为矰,至於龙,吾不能知,其乘风云而上天。吾今日见老子,其犹龙邪。老子修吾知其能游;兽,吾知其能走。走者可以为罔,游者可以为纶,飞者可以为矰,至於龙,吾不能知,其乘风云而上天。吾今日见老子,其犹龙邪。老子修道德,其学以自隐无名为务。居周久之,见周之衰,乃遂去。至关,关令尹喜曰:子将隐矣,强为我着书。於是老子乃着书上下篇,言道德之意五千余言而去,莫知其所终。或曰:老莱子亦楚人也,着书十五篇,言道家之用,与孔子同时云。盖老子百有六十余岁,或言二百余岁,以其修道而养寿也。自孔子死之后百二十九年,而史记周太史儋见秦献公曰:始秦与周合而离,离五百岁而复合,合七十岁而霸王者出焉。或曰儋即老子,或曰非也,世莫知其然否。合而离,离五百岁而复合,合七十岁而霸王者出焉。或曰儋即老子,或曰非也,世莫知其然否。老子,隐君子也。老子之子名宗,宗为魏将,封於段干。宗子注,注子宫,宫玄孙假,假仕於汉孝文帝。而假之子解为胶西王印太傅,因家於齐焉。世之学老子者则绌儒学,儒学亦绌老子。道不同不相为谋,岂谓是邪?李耳无为自化,清净自正。
Interpretation

Laozi was a native of Quren Village, Lixiang, in Ku County of the state of Chu. His surname was Li, his personal name Er, and his courtesy name Boyang; his posthumous title was Dan. He once served in the Zhou court as Keeper of the Archives, responsible for managing its books and records. When Confucius went to Zhou, he intended to ask Laozi about ritual. Laozi said to him, “The ancient people you speak of have bodies and bones that have long since decayed. Only their words remain. When the time is right, a gentleman takes office and acts; when it is not, he drifts like tumbleweed on the wind. I have heard that a skilled merchant hides his goods away so that he appears to have nothing. A gentleman of deep virtue looks dull on the outside. Set aside your pride and excessive desires, and rein in your outward bearing and overweening ambitions. None of these things will do you any good. This is all I can tell you.”

After Confucius left, he said to his disciples, “Birds—I know they can fly. Fish—I know they can swim. Beasts—I know they can run. Those that run can be caught in nets; those that swim can be caught on fishing lines; those that fly can be brought down with arrows. As for the dragon, I do not know how to understand it. It rides the wind and clouds and rises into the sky. The Laozi I met today must be something like a dragon.”

Laozi studied the learning of the Dao and De, and made a practice of concealing himself and avoiding fame. He lived in Zhou for a long time. Seeing that the Zhou court was steadily declining, he left. When he reached the Hangu Pass, the pass official Yin Xi said to him, “You are about to go into seclusion. Please write a book for me.” Laozi then composed two chapters, more than five thousand words in all, setting out the meaning of the Dao and De. Afterward he departed, and no one knew where he eventually went.

Some say that Lao Laizi was also from Chu and lived at the same time as Confucius. He wrote fifteen works discussing the practical application of Daoist teachings. Some say Laozi lived for more than 160 years; others say he lived for more than 200, believing this was due to his practice of the Dao and cultivation of life.

One hundred and twenty-nine years after Confucius died, the Grand Historian Dan of Zhou, an official in charge of historical records and calendrical astronomy, visited Duke Xian of Qin and said, “At first, Qin and Zhou were united and then separated. Five hundred years after their separation, they will unite again. Seventy years after that union, a ruler who claims kingship and supremacy will arise.” Some say Grand Historian Dan was Laozi; others say he was not. No one in the world can be certain.

Laozi was a gentleman who lived in seclusion and never took office. His son was named Zong. Zong became a general of Wei and was enfeoffed at Duangan. Zong’s son was named Zhu, and Zhu’s son was named Gong. Gong’s great-great-grandson was named Jia, who held office during the reign of Emperor Wen of Han. Jia’s son, Jie, became tutor to the King of Jiaoxi, and the family then moved to Qi.

Those who study Laozi’s teachings in the world often reject Confucian learning, while those who study Confucianism reject Laozi’s teachings. Is this what is meant by “When the Dao is different, there can be no common counsel”? Li Er advocated Wuwei (non-action), allowing the myriad things to transform naturally, and using stillness and clarity to set oneself aright.

隋薛道衡老子庙碑曰:自太极权舆,上元开辟,举天维而悬日月,横地角而载山河,一消一息之精灵,上生下生之气候,固以财成庶类,亭毒群品,有人民焉,有君长焉。至若上皇邃古,夏巢冬穴,静神习智,鹑居毂饮,大礼与天地同节,非折疑於俎豆,大乐与天地同和,岂考。至若上皇邃古,夏巢冬穴,静神习智,鹑居毂饮,大礼与天地同节,非折疑於俎豆,大乐与天地同和,岂考击於锺鼓。逮乎失道后德,失德后仁,皇王有步骤之殊,民俗有淳腌之变,於是儒墨争骛,名法并驰,礼经三百,不能检其情性,刑典三千,未足息其奸宄。故知洁其流者澄其源,直其末者正其本,源源本本,其惟大道乎。老君感星载诞,莫测受气之由,指树为姓,未详吹律之本,含灵在孕七十余年,生而白首,自以老子为号。其状也,三门双柱,表耳目之奇;蹈五把十,影手足之异。爰自伏羲,至於周氏,绵杞历代,见质变名,在文王武王之时,居藏史柱史之职,南朝屡易,容貌不改。宣尼一睹,叹龙德之难知;关尹四望,识真人之将隐。乃发挥众妙,着书二篇,率性归道,以无为用,其辞简而要,其旨深而远。
Interpretation

At the beginning of the world’s formation, Taiji, the original source before the cosmos divided, began to move. The Qi of the Upper Origin brought Heaven and Earth into being. The sun and moon hung in the sky between Heaven and Earth, while mountains and rivers stretched across the land. Yin and Yang Qi waxed and waned and transformed, giving rise to the vitality of all things and to the seasons and climate. Heaven and Earth nurtured the many forms of life, allowing all things to grow. Thus the people came into being, along with their rulers.

In ancient times, people lived in trees during summer and in caves during winter. They quietly nourished their spirit and learned wisdom, living simply and freely. The great rites of that age accorded with the rhythms of Heaven and Earth; they needed no ritual vessels to distinguish right from wrong. The great music resonated with the harmony of Heaven and Earth—what need was there to strike bells and drums?

Later, people gradually lost the Dao, then lost De, and, after that, even their benevolence declined. Rulers of successive dynasties governed in different ways, and the people’s customs changed from honest and simple to shallow and corrupt. The schools of Confucianism and Mohism then rose in fierce contention, while doctrines concerned with social distinctions and penal law also flourished. Though the rites and regulations numbered three hundred, they could not restrain human nature; though the laws numbered three thousand provisions, they could not put an end to treachery and wrongdoing. To set the later growth straight, one must first clear the source; to make the branches straight, one must first correct the root. Only the Dao can reach the source and the root.

The Venerable Lord (Laozi) was born in response to the stars, though no one can fathom the circumstances by which he received Qi and entered the womb. He pointed to a plum tree and took “Li,” meaning “plum,” as his surname. The marvels said to have accompanied his birth are not reliably known. It is said that he remained in the womb for more than seventy years and was already white-haired when he was born, so he called himself “Laozi,” or “Old Master.” His appearance bore unusual features, including three gates and twin pillars, and his hands and feet were shaped unlike those of ordinary people.

From Fuxi through the Zhou dynasty, the Venerable Lord lived through many eras, changing his appearance and name along the way. During the reigns of King Wen and King Wu of Zhou, he held offices such as Keeper of the Archives and Keeper of the Pillar. Though he migrated south many times, his appearance never changed. Confucius once met him and marveled that his De was unfathomable, like that of a dragon. From afar, Yin Xi, the legendary keeper of Hangu Pass, recognized that this realized person was about to withdraw from the world.

The Venerable Lord expounded many mysterious principles and composed two books that follow one’s nature and return to the Dao, taking Wuwei (non-action) as their guiding principle. Their wording is concise, yet their meaning is profound.

飞知;关尹四望,识真人之将隐。乃发挥众妙,着书二篇,率性归道,以无为用,其辞简而要,其旨深而远。飞龙成卦,未足比其精微,获麟笔削,不能方其显晦。用之治身则神清志静,用之治国则反朴还淳。既而炼形物表,卷迹方外,蜺裳鹤驾,往来紫府,金浆玉酒,燕衍清都,参日月之光华,与天地而终始。涉其流者则摈落嚣尘,得其门者则腾骧云雾。大椿凋茂,非蜉蝣之所知;溟渤浅深,岂冯夷之能测。盛矣哉,固无德而称也。庄周云:老聃死,秦佚吊之,三号而出。是谓遁天之形。虽复傲吏之寓言,抑亦蝉蜕之微旨。皇帝诞灵纵睿,接统膺期,照春陵之赤光,发芒山之紫气。珠衡月角,天表冠於百王;明镜衢罇,圣德会於千祀。周道云季,多难在时。九鼎共海水同飞,两日与洛川俱断。天齐地轴之所,蛇食鲸吞;铜陵玉垒之区,狼顾鸱跱。季,多难在时。九鼎共海水同飞,两日与洛川俱断。天齐地轴之所,蛇食鲸吞;铜陵玉垒之区,狼顾鸱跱。黄延奸宄,郑阻兵祸,大纵毒螫,将遍函夏,神谋内断,灵武外驰。应搀抢而扫除,仗旄钺而斩伐。共工既剪,重立乾坤;蚩尤就戮,更调风雨。宰制同造化之功,生灵荷魂魄之赐。万方欣戴,九服讴歌,乃允答天人,祇膺揖让。升泰坛而礼上帝,坐明堂而朝群后。昔轩辕颛顼,建国不同。大昊少昊,邦畿各异。舜改尧都,夏迁虞邑,历选前辟,义存创造。
Interpretation

However subtle the changes in the hexagrams of the Book of Changes, they cannot compare with the refined principles expounded in the Laozi. Nor can Confucius, using the Spring and Autumn Annals to praise and censure through the brush of history, be compared with the Laozi’s subtle and far-reaching meanings. Applied to self-cultivation, the principles of the Laozi can clear the spirit and still the will; applied to governing the state, they can restore simplicity and honesty.

With further cultivation, one may transcend the mundane world in body and vanish from the realm of ordinary life. Clad in garments like colored clouds, one rides a crane to and fro among the Purple Mansions, the palaces where immortals dwell. Drinking golden nectar and jade liquid, one feasts at ease in the Clear Capital, the realm of immortals, sharing the radiance of the sun and moon and enduring as long as Heaven and Earth. Those who follow this path can leave the noisy world behind; those who grasp its gateway seem to soar amid clouds and mist. The flourishing and decline of the great Chun tree lie beyond the understanding of a mayfly with its brief life. How could the depth of the sea be measured by Fengyi, the river spirit? This principle is truly vast, beyond the measure of ordinary virtue.

Zhuang Zhou said, “After Lao Dan died, Qin Yi went to mourn him. He cried three times, then left.” This means that Lao Dan followed the Way of Heaven and was not bound by worldly notions of life and death. Though this may be no more than a parable by Zhuangzi, it also holds the subtle suggestion that cultivators of the Way cast off their bodily forms like cicadas shedding their shells and transcend the world.

The emperor was naturally gifted and perceptive, wise and discerning. He inherited the imperial line and followed Heaven’s mandate. At his birth, red light shone over Chunling and purple clouds rose above Mang Mountain. His forehead bore the marks of a pearl balance and a moon-shaped horn; his natural bearing surpassed that of all rulers of past ages. His discernment was clear as a mirror, his virtue broad as a wine vessel, and his sagely excellence had gathered over a thousand years.

At the end of the Zhou dynasty, the realm was beset by troubles. The Nine Tripods seemed to drift away with the waters of the sea, and the two rulers, like the Luo River, came one after another to an end. Around Tianqi and the Earth Axis, powerful foes surged like snakes swallowing whales. Around Tongling and Yulei, rebels lurked like wolves and made their lairs like owls. Huang Yan’s treachery stirred up disorder; Zheng relied on military force and brought calamity. Poisonous harm spread widely, nearly engulfing the Central Plain. In court, the emperor deliberated and made decisions; beyond it, he struck swiftly with divine martial power. He responded to the calamities revealed by celestial signs, quelled the rebellions, and led armies bearing banners and battle axes against his enemies.

After Gonggong was cut down, the order of Heaven and Earth was restored. After Chiyou was executed, wind and rain returned to harmony. The emperor governed the realm with achievements like those of creation itself; the people received his beneficence and could live in peace and security. The people of the four directions supported him, and the inhabitants of the nine provinces sang his praises. His accession answered the will of Heaven and the hearts of the people, and he reverently accepted the abdication. He then ascended the Tai Altar to sacrifice to the Lord on High and took his seat in the Bright Hall to receive the homage of the feudal lords.

In former times, Xuanyuan and Zhuanxu established their capitals in different places; the territories of Dahu and Shaohao also differed. Shun changed the site of Yao’s capital, and the Xia dynasty moved to a place that had once belonged to Shun. Rulers of successive ages chose new institutions according to the circumstances of their times, with the aim of opening a new chapter.

惜十家之产,爱兆民之力。经始帝居,不移天府。规模紫极,仍据皇图。下宇上栋,务存卑俭。右平左摵,聿遵制度。朝夕正殿,不别起于鸳鸾;升降灵台,岂更营于鳷鹊。忧劳庶绩,矜育苍生。念兹在兹,发。右平左摵,聿遵制度。朝夕正殿,不别起于鸳鸾;升降灵台,岂更营于鳷鹊。忧劳庶绩,矜育苍生。念兹在兹,发於寤寐。棘林肺石,特降皇情。祝网泣辜,深存宽简。草缨知耻,画服兴惭。天无入牢之星,地绝城牛之气。延阁广内,考集群典。石渠壁水,阐扬儒业。缀五礼於将坏,正六乐於已崩。总章溺志之音,大师咸功之颂。承华养德,作贰东朝,外正万邦,内弘三善。两离炳耀,重日垂明。永固洪基,克隆鼎祉。重以维城盘石,多艺多才,良佐宝臣,允文允武。为王室之蕃屏,成神化之丹青。致世俗於润涂,钠需民於寿域,旄头垂象,穷发成形。獯猃作患,其来久矣。无上算以制之,用下策而难服。自我开运,耀德戢兵,感义怀仁,称藩请朔,稽颡款塞,匍匐投掌。柯夜郎之所,靡漠桑榆之地,咸被声教,并入提封。闽越勾吴,不愆贡职;夫余肃慎,无绝夷邸。
Interpretation

They took care to preserve the accumulated wealth of every household and to value the people’s labor. When construction began on the emperor’s residence, the capital was not moved, nor was the state’s foundation shifted. The palace followed the plan of the imperial capital, with the realm itself remaining the basis of rule. Its roofs and beams were kept plain and modest. The arrangement of buildings on either side of the palace strictly followed established rules. Morning and evening, the emperor attended to affairs of state in the main hall; he built no separate Hall of Mandarin Ducks and Phoenixes. He ascended the Observatory, the high terrace for viewing the heavens, without building a separate Tower of Magpies within the palace grounds. Concerned with the duties of government and attentive to the people’s care and welfare, he kept these matters constantly in mind, even in sleep.

The court showed special mercy to prisoners. The Thorn Grove and the Lung Stone were ancient places where people could appeal against injustice and seek a judgment. The emperor followed the ancient examples of releasing animals from nets and weeping for the innocent, governing with a generous and restrained hand. Criminals who wore hats tied with straw cord knew shame and repented; even those dressed in garments marked with the signs of punishment felt remorse. No longer did ominous stars foretell calamity through imprisonment, nor did earthly signs suggest that prisons would multiply.

The court collected and organized books in the Extension Library and the Expansive Repository, and discussed and promoted Confucian learning at the Stone Canal Pavilion and Biyong, the ancient imperial academy. It repaired the Five Rites, the five systems of ritual that were falling into disuse, and restored the Six Musics, the ancient system of ceremonial music that had fallen into ruin. In the Zongzhang Palace, music that might lead people astray rang out, while the Grand Musician sang of the achievements of peace throughout the realm. The crown prince cultivated his De in the Chenghua Palace, assisting with the government as heir to the Eastern Palace. He upheld the proper order of the feudal lords beyond the court and promoted the Three Goods within it, each ruler, father, and son fulfilling their own goodness. Ruler and ministers shone together like the sun and moon, making the state’s fortunes enduring and secure, and its blessings ever more abundant.

The imperial clan also stood firm as a rocky bulwark. Its members were gifted in many arts, worthy ministers skilled in both letters and arms. They guarded the royal domain and helped make the state’s teachings shine. They guided worldly customs onto a broad and level road, and led the people into a life of long years and peace. The star Mao appeared in the heavens, and disturbances arose even in the remote northern wilderness. The Xun and Xian peoples had long threatened the borders. In the past, no sound strategy had been found to bring them under control; only inferior measures were used, and so they were difficult to bring into submission. Since this dynasty established its fortunes, it has displayed virtue and halted warfare, transforming distant peoples through benevolence and righteousness. They then declared themselves vassals and asked to observe the dynasty’s calendar, bowing their heads as they came to the frontier and respectfully submitted. Ke Yelang, and lands as far away as the northwestern frontier where the sun sets, were reached by the court’s moral influence and brought within its domain. Minyue and Gouwu sent tribute at the appointed times, while Fuyu and Sushen continued to dispatch envoys to the capital with offerings.

,感义怀仁,称藩请朔,稽颡款塞,匍匐投掌。柯夜郎之所,靡漠桑榆之地,咸被声教,并入提封。闽越勾吴,不愆贡职;夫余肃慎,无绝夷邸。遐迩提福,文轨大同。自三代之余,六雄竞逐,秦居闰位,汉杂溜道,魏氏则虐深华夏,有晋则化成夷狄。降斯以后,粹驳不分,帝迹皇风,寂寥千载,天命圣德,会昌神道。变亿兆之视听,复三五之规模。固以幽明赞协,符瑞彪炳。千年灵蔡,着天性以效征;三足神乌,感阳精而表质。春泉如醴,出自京师。秋之视听,复三五之规模。固以幽明赞协,符瑞彪炳。千年灵蔡,着天性以效征;三足神乌,感阳精而表质。春泉如醴,出自京师。秋露凝甘,褊於竹苇。星光若月,云气飞烟。三农应铜爵之呜,五纬叶珠囊之度。信可以扬銮动跸,肆觐东后。玉检金绳,登封岱岳。而谦以自牧,为而不宰。尚寝马卿之书,未允梁松之奏。在青蒲之上,常若乘奔;处黄屋之下,无忘夕惕。虽苍璧黄琮,事天事地。南正火正,属神之提。犹恐祀典未弘,秩宗废礼。永言仁里,尚想玄极。寿宫灵座,麋鹿徙倚。华盖罽坛,风霜凋弊。乃韶上开府仪同三司亳州刺史武陵公元冑,考其故迹,营建祠堂。皇上往因历试,总斯蕃部,犹汉光司隶之所,魏武兖州之地。对苦相之两城,绕涡谷之三水。芝田柳路,北走粱园。沃野平皋,东连谯国。
Interpretation

Fame spread far and wide, bringing blessings to people everywhere, while the institutions and customs of the realm gradually grew more uniform. After the final years of the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties, the Six Kingdoms fought one another in relentless campaigns. The Qin emperors’ claim to the throne was deemed illegitimate, and the Han approach to governance was mixed with disorderly elements. The Cao Wei regime ruled with cruelty and oppression, gravely harming the Central Plains; under the Jin, customs and moral instruction gradually took on the ways of the frontier peoples. Thereafter, purity and corruption were mingled, and the achievements of emperors and the moral influence of dynasties fell silent for a thousand years. Now, sagely virtue accords with Heaven’s mandate, and the divine Way has entered a time of flourishing. The vision and understanding of countless people are being transformed, and the political order is being restored to the scale of the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors.

The spirits between Heaven and Earth have all come to assist, and auspicious signs have appeared in striking abundance. A numinous tortoise, a thousand years old, revealed its innate spiritual nature as an omen of confirmation. A three-legged divine crow responded to the sun’s vital essence and showed itself in visible form. In spring, a spring as sweet as wine welled up in the capital; in autumn, dew gathered and fell sweetly among the bamboo and reeds. Starlight shone bright as the moon, and clouds drifted like smoke. Farming followed the calls of the bronze sparrow, while the movements of the five planets accorded with the celestial degrees recorded in the Pearl Bag. These auspicious signs surely warranted the emperor’s riding in his phoenix carriage and setting out on a grand progress to receive the eastern lords in audience. They also warranted a great Fengshan ceremony on Mount Tai, where sacrificial texts would be sealed with jade tablets and golden cords.

Yet the emperor remained modest and self-restrained. Though he took action, he did not claim credit or presume to rule as master. He continued to set aside Sima Xiangru’s treatise on the Fengshan ceremony and did not accept Liang Song’s petition. When holding court on a mat of green rushes, he was ever as cautious as one riding at speed on a swift horse; even on the imperial throne, he did not forget to keep watch over himself at night. Although he had already offered the blue bi disc and yellow cong tube in sacrifice to Heaven and Earth, and appointed officials such as the Southern and Fire Rectifiers to oversee rites to the spirits, he still feared that the sacrificial system was not fully in order and that the officials responsible for ritual had neglected its rules.

For a long time, he had yearned for a realm of benevolence and admired the mysterious Dao. The spirit seats in the Longevity Palace had fallen into disrepair, with deer wandering there; the felt altar, shaped like a canopy, had also been worn down by wind and frost and was crumbling with age. The emperor therefore ordered Yuan Zhou, who held the rank of Kaifu Yitong Sansi, served as governor of Bozhou, and bore the title Duke of Wuling, to investigate the old site and build a shrine.

The emperor had once gained experience in this region and had commanded the tribes of the area. It was also where Emperor Guangwu of Han had served as Colonel Director of Retainers, and an old seat of Cao Cao’s administration of Yan Province. The shrine faced the two cities of Kuxiang and was bordered by three rivers, including the Wo and Gu. To the north, fields of spirit fungi and willow-lined roads led toward the Liang Garden; fertile plains stretched eastward to the state of Qiao. People set markers by the water, measured the sun’s shadow, and surveyed the terrain to determine the shrine’s location.

望水置槷,揆景瞻地。对苦相之两城,绕涡谷之三水。芝田柳路,北走粱园。沃野平皋,东连谯国。望水置槷,揆景瞻星。拟玄圃以疏基,横玉京而建宇。雕楹画拱,磊砢相扶。方井圆洲,参差交映。尊容肃穆,仙卫俨而无声;神馆虚闲,洎沥降而成向。清心洁行之士,存玄守一之俦,四方辐凑,千里波属。知如在之敬,申醮祀之礼。显仁助於王者,冥福资於黎献。允所谓天大道大,难几者矣。若夫名言顿绝,幽泉之路莫开;形器不陈,妙物之功难着。腾茂实,飞英声,图丹青,镂金石,不可以已,而在兹乎?岁次敦牂,律中姑洗。大隋驭天下之六载也,乃诏下臣建碑作颂,其词曰:悠哉振古,邈矣帝先。四纪维地,八柱承天。丛生类聚,广谷大次敦牂,律中姑洗。大隋驭天下之六载也,乃诏下臣建碑作颂,其词曰:悠哉振古,邈矣帝先。四纪维地,八柱承天。丛生类聚,广谷大川。至道灵运,神功自然。五精应感,三微相继。树以司牧,执其象契。帝迹惭皇,王猷谢帝。上德逾远,淳风渐替。时乖澹泊,俗异冲和。尚贤饰智,悬法张罗。内修尊俎,外事干戈。鱼惊网密,鸟乱弓多。真人出世,星精下斗。龙德在躬,鹤发垂首。解纷挫锐,去薄归厚。日角月角,天长地久。小兹五岳,隘此九州。逝将高蹈,超然远游。青牛已驾,紫气光浮。玄门洞启,神化潜流。赖乡旧里,涡川遗迩。古往今来,时移世易。
Interpretation

First measure the water level and erect a marker, then determine the directions from the shadows of the sun and the positions of the stars. Following the model of Xuanpu, the fabled garden of the immortals, the foundation was laid out; the Celestial Capital, the heavenly palace of Daoist tradition, was planned across the site, and halls were built. The pillars were finely carved, and the bracket sets painted in bright colors, joined tier upon tier and supporting one another. Square and round coffered ceilings alternated in harmonious patterns. The divine images stood solemn and dignified, while immortal attendants stood in orderly silence. The shrine was still and spacious; fragrant liquid dripped and gathered into streams, as if flowing toward the dwelling place of the gods.

Those who purified their hearts and conduct, and cultivators who preserved the spirit and guarded the One—focusing the mind to hold fast to their nature—came from every direction. Their steady stream reached from as far away as a thousand miles. With reverence, they believed the gods were present before them and solemnly performed the Jiao sacrifice, a Daoist ritual offering. The gods made their benevolence manifest and assisted the ruler; in the unseen realm, they also bestowed blessings upon the people. This may truly be called the vastness of the Dao of Heaven, beyond human fathoming.

Without recording their deeds and words, there would be no way to open the path to the hidden terrace of the netherworld. Without displaying images and ritual objects, the workings of subtle things would remain obscure. Thus, to proclaim an honored name and spread its renown, to render it in pictures and engrave it on metal and stone—these are all indispensable. That is their significance.

The year was Dunqiang, corresponding to the Horse in the cyclical calendar, and the seasonal pitch was Guxian, one of the ancient twelve pitch standards. In the sixth year of the Great Sui dynasty’s rule over the realm, the emperor issued an edict commanding me to erect a stele and compose an ode. The ode reads:

From ancient times, the source has flowed far and long; the emperors of remote antiquity lie in a distant age. The four quarters uphold the earth, while eight pillars support the heavens. All things gather and come to life in their kinds, amid broad valleys and great rivers spread across the land. The Supreme Dao transforms the myriad things, and its wondrous workings arise naturally. The vital essences of the Five Phases respond to one another, while the qi of the Three Subtleties continues its course. Thus rulers were established to govern the people, holding the tokens that signify authority. The achievements of emperors could not equal those of the sage sovereigns, nor could the way of kings match that of emperors. The virtues of high antiquity gradually receded, and the ways of simplicity slowly declined. The age turned away from quietude, and customs no longer accorded with peace. People prized reputation and flaunted cunning, hanging nets of law and setting traps. Within, they concerned themselves with the rites of feasting; beyond, they took up arms. Fish were terrorized by the close mesh of the nets, and birds scattered in panic before the many bows and arrows.

A perfected one appeared in the world, as the essence of the stars descended from the Northern Dipper. He embodied the virtue of the dragon, his white hair hanging over his head. He resolved disputes and sheathed his sharpness, cast off shallowness and returned to sincerity. His bearing shone like the sun and moon, and his virtue endured like Heaven and Earth. He deemed the Five Sacred Peaks too small and the Nine Provinces too narrow, and resolved to leave the dusty world, journeying far beyond it in lofty freedom. The green ox was already harnessed, and purple qi appeared ahead. The Mysterious Gate, the portal to the realm of the Dao, stood open, and the power of wondrous transformation quietly flowed forth.

Lai Township was his home; the Wo River, the trace he left behind. From ancient times to the present, the ages have continually changed.

灵庙凋毁,祠坛虚寂。九井生桐,双碑碎石。维皇受命,乃神乃圣。响发地锺,光垂天镜。宇宙开朗,妖氛荡定。曜魄同尊,参神取正。流沙蟠水,凤穴龟林。异,双碑碎石。维皇受命,乃神乃圣。响发地锺,光垂天镜。宇宙开朗,妖氛荡定。曜魄同尊,参神取正。流沙蟠水,凤穴龟林。异类归款,万方宅心。鸿卢纳赆,王会书琛。青云千吕,熏风入琴。化致鼎平,家兴礼让。永言柱下,犹惭太上。乃建清祠,式图灵状。原隰爽垲,亭皋弥望。梅梁桂楝,曲槛丛楹。烟霞舒卷,风务凄清。仙官就位,羽客来庭。禳禳简简,降福明灵。至神不测,理存系象。大音希声,时振高响。遐迩赞颂,幽明资仰。敬刊金石,永播天壤。敬叔师仲尼,仲尼谓敬叔曰:吾闻老聃博古而通今,通礼乐之原,明道德之归,则吾师也。敬叔言於鲁君曰:孔丘,圣人之后,将达者也。受先臣之命,吾闻老聃博古而通今,通礼乐之原,明道德之归,则吾师也。敬叔言於鲁君曰:孔丘,圣人之后,将达者也。受先臣之命,属臣则必师之。今孔子将适周,观先王之遗制,考礼乐之所极,斯大业也。君盍以车乘赉之,臣请与往。鲁君与车一乘、二马、二竖子。敬叔俱至周,问礼於老聃,访乐於苌弘,历郊社之所,考明堂之则,察朝廷之度。
Interpretation

The temple had fallen into ruin, and the grounds where sacrifices were once offered stood empty and deserted. Paulownia trees had sprung up beside the nine wells, while the paired steles had crumbled into stone.

The emperor had received the Mandate of Heaven; he was both sacred and wise. The bells rang on earth, and a mirror-bright radiance descended from the heavens. All between heaven and earth opened up in clarity, and baleful forces were swept away. The sun, moon, and stars were all honored, and the laws were set in order by taking the gods as a model. From the lands beyond the flowing sands and the banks of the winding rivers, from the caves where phoenixes dwelled and the woods where sacred turtles appeared, peoples of every kind came to submit. The hearts of people throughout the realm turned toward the court. The Court of State Ceremonial received gifts offered from every quarter, and the princes presented treasures when they gathered. Blue clouds towered a thousand ren above, while the gentle southern breeze blended with the music of the qin. Through instruction, the state was brought to order, and the people embraced the custom of yielding precedence to one another.

Whenever I speak of Laozi, the Archivist beneath the Pillar, I still feel that I fall short of the Most High Lord Lao. So a quiet temple was built, and the forms of the spirits were painted. The temple stood on a high, open site, overlooking fields and waterside pavilions in the distance. Its beams were made of plum wood and its rafters of cinnamon wood; rows of pillars stood between curving balustrades. Mists and rosy clouds unfurled and gathered again, while the wind sounded cool and clear. The celestial officials took their places, and Daoist practitioners came into the courtyard. With solemn dignity, they performed the rites and prayed for the gods to bestow blessings.

The highest spirits are beyond our power to fathom, yet their principles can still be conveyed through images. The greatest sound seems like silence, yet it resounds when the time is right. People both near and far sing their praises; the netherworld and the human realm alike depend on the gods’ protection. Therefore, these events were reverently engraved on metal and stone, so they might endure forever between heaven and earth.

Jingshu studied under Zhongni (Confucius). Zhongni said to him, “I have heard that Lao Dan is learned in the ways of past and present, understands the foundations of ritual and music, and knows where the Way and Virtue lead. He is my teacher.” Jingshu said to the ruler of Lu, “Kong Qiu is descended from a sage and is destined for distinction. By command of my late lord, I have heard that Lao Dan is learned in the ways of past and present, understands the foundations of ritual and music, and knows where the Way and Virtue lead. Kong Qiu must therefore go and study under him. Now Confucius is about to travel to Zhou to examine the institutions handed down by the former kings and investigate the highest principles of ritual and music. This is a momentous undertaking. Why not provide him with a carriage? I ask to accompany him.”

The ruler of Lu gave Confucius a carriage, two horses, and two attendants. Jingshu accompanied him to Zhou. Confucius sought instruction from Lao Dan on ritual, from Chang Hong on music, and also visited the sites of the suburban and land sacrifices, examined the layout of the Bright Hall, and observed the ceremonies of the court.

观明堂四门之塘,有尧舜桀纣之象,各有善恶之状、兴废之戒焉。又有周公相成王,抱之而负斧宸,南面以朝诸侯之图,叹曰:吾乃今知周公之善恶之状、兴废之戒焉。又有周公相成王,抱之而负斧宸,南面以朝诸侯之图,叹曰:吾乃今知周公之圣,与周之所以王也。将去周,老子送之,曰:富者送人以财,仁者送人以言。吾窃仁者之号,送子以言。凡当世之士,聪明深察而近於死者,好议人之非者也。博辨闳大而危其身者,好发人之恶者也。为人臣者无以有己,为人子者无以有己。自周反,鲁道弥尊。远方弟子之进者,盖三千焉。孔子叹曰:自南宫敬叔之乘吾车,吾道加行。不然,吾道几废矣。今《礼记》所引吾闻诸老聃,皆是孔子问老子而得其礼之要也。 王子季《拾遗记》曰:老君居景室之山,与世人绝迹。唯老叟五人,或乘鸣鹤,或着羽衣,共谭天地之数,所撰经书,垂十万言。有
Interpretation

When viewing the pond by the four gates of the Bright Hall, one could see images of Yao, Shun, Jie, and Zhou, each showing a different face of goodness or evil and offering a warning about the rise and fall of states. There was also an image of the Duke of Zhou assisting King Cheng: he held the young king in his arms, stood with an axe-shaped screen behind him, and faced south to receive the court audience of the feudal lords. After seeing it, he exclaimed, “Only now do I understand the Duke of Zhou’s good and evil deeds, and the warning about the rise and fall of states.” He exclaimed again, “Only now do I understand why the Duke of Zhou was so sagely, and how the Zhou dynasty came to rule all under Heaven.”

As the Duke of Zhou was about to leave Zhou, Laozi went to see him off and said, “When the wealthy see someone off, they give them material gifts; when the humane see someone off, they give them words. I have presumed to call myself humane, so let me offer you a few words. People of this age who are clever and sharp, with penetrating insight, face danger and even death because they enjoy discussing other people’s faults. Those who are widely learned, skilled in argument, and broad-minded bring danger upon themselves because they enjoy exposing other people’s wrongs. A minister should not think only of himself, and neither should a son.”

After the Duke of Zhou returned from Zhou, the rites of Lu came to be held in still greater esteem. Some three thousand disciples came from distant places to study them. Confucius remarked, “It was only after Nan Gong Jingshu took me on a journey by carriage that my teachings were able to spread widely. Without that, my teachings would nearly have been lost.”

The passages cited in the Book of Rites that begin with words such as “I once heard Lao Dan say” are all key points about ritual that Confucius learned by seeking Laozi’s guidance.

Wang Ziji’s Record of Lost Writings says that the Lord Lao lived on Mount Jingshi, cut off from contact with ordinary people. Only five elders would visit him. Sometimes they rode calling immortal cranes; sometimes they wore feathered robes. Together they discussed the principles governing Heaven and Earth. The scriptures they composed totaled nearly one hundred thousand words. There was…

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 1 Vol. 3 →