中文 · EN

《道德真经疏义》Vol. 2

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 Vol. 2 / 8 25,000 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真经疏义》 Vol. 2 (Taixuan 太玄部, 8 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 62 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真经疏义》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

『而搏之不得」。 #3物为一曲:『物』前疑脱『在』。 #4冬夏不寺:疑为『冬夏不争』。 #5左屈而右:『右』后疑脱『伸』。 5-道德真经疏义卷之三 道德真经疏义卷之三 太学生江澄疏 载营魄章第十 徽宗注曰:魄,阴也,丽於体而有所止,故老氏於魄言营。魂,阳也,托於气而无不之,故《易》於魂言游。圣人以神御形,以魂制魄,故神常载魄而不载於魄,如车之运,百物载焉,如时之行,寒暑往焉。心有天游,六彻相因,外天地,遗万物,而神未尝有所困也,岂复滞於魄哉? 疏义曰:魄,色所生也,其字从白。白,阴色也。入而不变,无所之焉,则丽於遗万物,而神未尝有所困也,岂复滞於魄哉?
Interpretation

Scriptural Title and “Grasped at but Not Obtained”

“Carrying the Yingpo,” Chapter Ten, is the title of chapter 10 of the Daodejing (the Way and Its Virtue). Its opening line is “Carrying the yingpo and embracing the One, can one not be separated?” “And grasped at but not obtained” comes from chapter 14: “Looked at but not seen, it is called yi; listened to but not heard, it is called xi; grasped at but not obtained, it is called wei.” It means that even when one reaches out to grasp it with the hand, one cannot catch it, describing the Dao (the Way) as formless and without image.

Huizong’s Commentary (Emperor Huizong of Song’s commentary on this chapter)

Po belongs to Yin, attaches to the body, and has a fixed location; therefore Laozi says “yingpo” (the Po can be managed and guarded). Hun belongs to Yang, relies on Qi (vital energy), and goes everywhere; therefore the Yijing uses the word “wandering” to describe Hun (“the wandering Hun becomes change”). The sage uses Shen (spirit) to govern the physical form and Hun to restrain Po. Thus Shen constantly carries Po but is not constrained by Po, just as a cart carries the ten thousand things as it moves, or as the four seasons turn with cold and heat coming and going; Shen remains free and unobstructed. Within the mind there is naturally an innate free wandering, with above and below and the four directions mutually depending on one another. Transcending heaven and earth and forgetting the ten thousand things, the spirit will have nothing to trouble it; how then could it be bound by the physical Po?

Subcommentary (Jiang Cheng’s explanation)

Po is produced by “form” (visible, substantial matter), so its character is formed from “white.” White belongs to Yin among the Five Colors. Po remains within form and substance and does not change with external things; having such a foundation, it becomes attached to physical form. But spirit can transcend the ten thousand things and not be trapped; naturally it will no longer be confined to the physical Po.

疏义曰:魄,色所生也,其字从白。白,阴色也。入而不变,无所之焉,则丽於体而有所止矣,故老氏於魄言营。营言有所止也。魂,气所主也,其字从云。云,阳气也。出入合散,精神应之,则托於气而无不之矣,故《易》於魂言游。游言无不之也。圣人以神御形,不使神为形所累;以魂制魄,不使魂为魄所拘。故神常载魄而不载於魄,如车之运,百物载焉,积中不败,如时之行,寒暑往焉,人物乘之。心有天游,超然出乎尘垢之外,而周尽一体,异乎狭其所居者。六彻相因,自目彻至於智彻,而充塞无外,异乎六凿相攘者。知天地与我并生而能外天地,知万物与我为一而能遗万物,出入六合,经纬万方,而神未尝有所困也,岂拘於形体而滞於魄哉? 抱一能无离乎?
Interpretation

The po (bodily soul) is generated from physical form (color); its character is written with “white,” and white is a Yin color. Once the po enters the human body, it no longer changes and does not roam about at will; it attaches to the physical form and remains there. This is why Laozi speaks of “yingpo” (encamped po): “ying” means having a place to dwell and rest.

The hun (ethereal soul) is governed by Qi (vital energy); its character is written with “cloud,” and cloud belongs to Yang Qi. The hun can exit and enter, gather and disperse; Jing (essence) and Shen (spirit) respond along with it, and relying on Qi it reaches everywhere. That is why the Zhouyi uses the word you (“roaming”) to describe it: you means going everywhere without restriction.

The sage uses Shen to govern the physical form, not allowing Jing and Shen to be burdened by it; he uses the hun to restrain the po, not allowing the hun to be constrained by the po. Thus Shen constantly rides above the po, but is not carried by the po. This is like a cart in motion: a hundred things are loaded within it, and though the accumulated load is great, it is not damaged. It is also like the movement of the four seasons: cold and heat come and go, and human beings and the ten thousand things all live and rest accordingly.

The heart-mind has a naturally free realm; it transcends beyond dust and defilement, yet can pervade the whole body—unlike those whose hearts are narrow and who guard only one place. The six penetrations (referring to the eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind—the six roots—being unobstructed and interconnected) communicate with one another, reaching directly from the eye-root to wisdom, filling all without obstruction; they are not like the six borings (where the six roots each cling and disturb one another) contending with one another. Understanding that Heaven and Earth are born together with me, one can transcend Heaven and Earth; understanding that the ten thousand things are one body with me, one can forget the ten thousand things. Coming and going throughout above and below and the four directions, moving freely among the myriad realms, Jing and Shen are never trapped—how could they be bound by the physical form or stalled by the po?

“Embracing the One” comes from Laozi, chapter 10: “Carrying the po and embracing the One, can they not be separated?” It means: embracing the unified Dao (the One), can one keep body and mind from becoming separated?

Emperor Huizong’s commentary repeats the final sentence above in order to emphasize: Jing and Shen transcend the physical form precisely because they are united with the ten thousand things; therefore they cannot be trapped by form and po.

徽宗注曰知万物与我为一而能遗万物,出入六合,经纬万方,而神未尝有所困也,岂拘於形体而滞於魄哉? 抱一能无离乎? 徽宗注曰:天一生水,於物为精。地二生火,於物为神。精神生於道,形本生於精,守而勿失,与神为一,则精与神合而不离。以精集神,以神使形,以形存神,精全而不亏,神用而不竭,形生而不敝,如日月之丽乎天,如草木之丽乎土,未常离也。窃尝申之,人之生也,因精集神,体像斯具,四达并流,无所不极,上际於天,下蟠於地,化育万物,不可为象,其名为同帝。而世之愚者,役己於物,失性於俗,无一息之顷,内存乎神,驰无穷之欲,外丧其精,魂反从魄,形反累神,而下与万物俱化,岂不惑焉?圣人则不然,载魄以通,抱一以守,体神以静,形将自正,其神经乎太山而不欲,外丧其精,魂反从魄,形反累神,而下与万物俱化,岂不惑焉?圣人则不然,载魄以通,抱一以守,体神以静,形将自正,其神经乎太山而不变,处乎渊泉而不濡,孰知其所始?孰知其所终?故曰圣人贵精。
Interpretation

Heaven’s one generates water; Earth’s two generates fire. (The ancients paired numbers with the Five Phases: Heaven, by one, generates water; Earth, by two, generates fire.) Among the ten thousand things, water corresponds to Jing (essence), and fire corresponds to Shen (spirit). Both Jing and Shen arise from the Dao (the Way), and the physical form originally arises from Jing as well. As long as one guards the root and does not let it be lost, and lets Shen become one with it, Jing and Shen will unite and not separate.

Use Jing to gather Shen, use Shen to direct the physical form, and use the physical form to preserve Shen. In this way Jing remains complete and undiminished, Shen can be employed without being exhausted, and the body can grow without decaying—like the sun and moon attached to the sky, or plants and trees relying on the earth, never separated from them.

I once elaborated further: human life exists because Jing gathers Shen; the physical form is thereby fully constituted, and the four limbs and hundred bones circulate freely, reaching everywhere. Above, it can connect with Heaven; below, it can coil and root in the great Earth, transforming and nurturing the ten thousand things in a way that cannot be described by images. This state may be called “identifying with the Emperor” (sharing the De, or virtue, of the Heavenly Emperor and the Great Dao).

Yet the foolish people of the world enslave themselves to external things and lose their original nature amid worldly customs. They cannot let the inner Shen settle even for a moment; they gallop amid endless desires and exhaust their Jing outward. Thereupon hun (the yang spirit) instead follows po (the yin bodily form), and the body in turn drags down Shen; in the end they transform together with the ten thousand things. Is this not bewildering?

The sages are not like this. They carry the po so as to reach through, embrace and guard the One (that is, the Dao) so as to preserve, realize Shen and return to stillness, and their physical form is naturally upright. Their Shen, even when passing through Mount Tai, is not changed by it; when situated in a deep abyss, it does not get wet. Who knows where it begins? Who knows where it ends? Therefore it is said: the sage values Jing.

疏义曰:道生一,一曰水,故天一生水,於物为精。一生二,二曰火,故地二生火,於物为神。物均有气,而精神为气之始;物均有数,而精神得数之先。则精神生於道矣,以昭昭生於冥冥故也。天地含精,万物化生,四时散精而为万物,则形本生於精矣,以有伦生於无形故也。善抱不脱,守而勿失,则执神而固,与神为一,故精与神合而不离,盖以天下之至精为能合天下之至神故也。以精集神,而不摇其精,故精全而不亏。以神使形,而抱神以静,故神用而不竭。以形存神,而神将守形,故形生而不敝。精全而神全,神全故也。以精集神,而不摇其精,故精全而不亏。以神使形,而抱神以静,故神用而不竭。以形存神,而神将守形,故形生而不敝。精全而神全,神全而形全,如曰月丽乎天而能久照,如草木丽乎土而能有立,未尝离也。且人之有生,精为身之本,精具而神从之,则因精集神体像斯具也。精出乎至阴,神出乎至阳,阴精为水,阳神为火。水火本无象也,以镒燧求焉而水火自至,则精神四达并流,无所不极可知。至阴肃肃,至阳赫赫,两者交通成和而物生,则我身之与天地,其本一也。然则上际下蟠,化育万物,名为同帝,理亦宜然。
Interpretation

The commentary says: The Dao (the Way) produces “One”; “One” is water. Therefore Heaven’s “One” generates water, and in the myriad things it manifests as Jing (essence). “One” generates “Two”; “Two” is fire. Therefore Earth’s “Two” generates fire, and in the myriad things it manifests as Shen (spirit). (“Heaven’s One generates water” and “Earth’s Two generates fire” are taken from the ancient numerical sequence by which the Five Phases [Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, Water] are generated.)

All things have Qi (vital energy), and Jing and Shen are the beginning of Qi; all things possess number, and Jing and Shen receive number earliest. It can be seen that Jing and Shen also arise from the Dao, because the luminous arises from the dark and subtly mysterious. Heaven and Earth contain and store Jing and Qi, and from this the myriad things are transformed and born; the four seasons disperse Jing and Qi and give form to the myriad things. Thus bodily form, too, is rooted in Jing and comes into being, because that which has form arises from the formless.

If one can skillfully embrace and guard it, guarding without losing it, one can hold fast to Shen, make it stable, and become one with Shen. Therefore Jing and Shen unite and do not separate, because the purest Jing in the world can unite with the most numinous and wondrous Shen in the world.

Using Jing to gather Shen without agitating one’s Jing, Jing and Qi are preserved intact and not depleted; using Shen to command the bodily form, embracing Shen and maintaining stillness and stability, the workings of Shen can continue without exhaustion; using the bodily form to preserve Shen, Shen in turn guards the bodily form, so the bodily form can grow and not decay. When Jing is preserved, Shen is preserved; when Shen is preserved, the bodily form is preserved as well. This is like the sun and moon hanging in the sky and shining enduringly, and grasses and trees clinging to the earth and standing and growing; the two are never separated.

In human life, Jing is the root of the body. When Jing is sufficient, Shen gathers along with it, and the body’s form and functions become complete. Jing comes from the Qi of utmost Yin, Shen from the Qi of utmost Yang; Yin Jing is water, Yang Shen is fire. Water and fire originally have no fixed form, but if one seeks them with a mirror and a fire-striker (ancient implements for obtaining fire), water and fire will come of themselves. From this we know that Jing and Shen pervade and circulate, and there is nowhere they do not reach. The Qi of utmost Yin is clear, still, and solemn; the Qi of utmost Yang is blazing and radiant. The two mutually resonate and blend into harmony, and the myriad things are thereby born. Seen in this way, my body and Heaven and Earth share the same source.

Therefore, the body can reach upward to the bounds of Heaven, downward it can occupy the earth, transform and nurture the myriad things, and be called identical with the Heavenly Emperor; such is the principle.

奈何倒置之民大愚而终身不灵,重外轻内,志本逐末,役己於物,失性於俗,中心上际下蟠,化育万物,名为同帝,理亦宜然。奈何倒置之民大愚而终身不灵,重外轻内,志本逐末,役己於物,失性於俗,中心营营,不得须突,宁无一息之顷。内存乎神,菁然疲役,不知其所归,驰无穷之欲。外丧其精,不能以精摄魂,魂反从魄,不能以神御形,形反累神,不能自别於物,下与万物俱化,岂不惑哉。圣人不然,载魄以通作则契理,抱一以守静则合道。无视无听,惟神是守,而抱神以静,不亏其神,慎守汝身,而形将自正。其神经乎太由而不变,其大无外;处乎渊泉而不濡,其小无内。迎之不见其首,孰原其所始?随之不见其后,孰要其所终?皆一之精通而然也。故庄子曰:圣人大无外;处乎渊泉而不濡,其小无内。迎之不见其首,孰原其所始?随之不见其后,孰要其所终?皆一之精通而然也。故庄子曰:圣人责精。舜之戒禹,其曰:惟精惟一。其知此欤? 专气致柔,能如婴儿乎?
Interpretation

The people of the world invert root and branch-tips, utterly benighted, never awakening in their whole lives. They value external things and slight the inner nature; they chase branch tips, become servants of external things, and lose their original nature amid the mundane world. Heart-mind and Shen (spirit) rush about in disorder within the chest, never at peace for a moment, so the inner Shen is exhausted and does not know where to return, merely chasing desires without end. The external Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy) dissipate accordingly: they cannot use Jing to govern the hun-soul, and the hun-soul instead follows the po-soul; they cannot use Shen to command the body, and the body instead burdens Shen. People cannot distinguish the boundary between themselves and external things; they sink downward and change and drift along with the myriad things—how could this not be delusion?

The sage is not like this. They take the po-soul as their support and cause its operation to accord with the norms of nature and conform to principle; embracing and guarding the One (the integral whole of the Dao) to maintain emptiness and stillness, they thereby accord with the Dao (the Way). They do not look or listen; they only guard their Shen. Embracing Shen with stillness, Shen suffers no loss; cautiously guarding themselves, the body naturally becomes upright. Their Shen roams in Taiyou (the realm of primeval chaos at the very beginning) without changing; in its greatness it has no outside. Dwelling in deep springs without becoming wet, in its smallness it has no inside. Facing it, one sees no beginning—who can trace its origin? Following it, one sees no end—who can exhaust its end? This is all because the purity of the One penetrates through and brings it about. Therefore Zhuangzi says, “The sage values Jing,” and Shun admonished Yu, “Only Jing, only the One”—presumably this is precisely to understand this principle.

“Can you concentrate your Qi and attain suppleness, so as to be like an infant?” This comes from Chapter 10 of the Laozi and means: can one concentrate and harmonize the original Qi to attain softness, like an infant? The infant’s breath is pure, harmonious, and smooth; its body and mind are not bound by external things; it is soft and weak, without contention, and its heart holds no bustling private desires. Laozi uses this as a metaphor for returning to the state of original authenticity. The “carrying the po-soul and embracing the One” mentioned above is precisely a commentary on this: settle the po-soul well, guard the One, and keep Jing and Qi from scattering; then one can be as soft and pure as an infant.

徽宗注曰:《易》曰:乾,其静也专。扬雄曰:和柔足以安物。静而不杂之谓专,和而不暴之谓柔。婴兄居不知所为,行不知所之,不藏是非美恶,故气专而致柔。孟子曰:蹶者趋者,是气也,而反动其心。心不足以专气,则气有蹶趋之不正,而心至于偾骄而不可。孟子曰:蹶者趋者,是气也,而反动其心。心不足以专气,则气有蹶趋之不正,而心至于偾骄而不可系。圣人虚己以进世,心无使气之强,则其静而不杂,和而不暴,与婴儿也奚择?故曰能如婴儿乎。孟子曰:其为气也,至大至刚,以直养而无害,则塞乎天地之间。老氏之专气,则曰政柔,何也?至刚以行义,致柔以复性,古之道术,无乎不在。
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: The Yi (Book of Changes) says, “Qian—in its stillness it is undivided.” Yang Xiong (a Western Han scholar) says, “Harmonious softness is sufficient to pacify things.” To be quiet without confusion is called “undivided” (zhuan); to be peaceful without violence is called “soft” (rou). When an infant (Daoists often use the infant as a metaphor for the pure, desireless mind) dwells, it does not know what it is about to do; when it walks, it does not know where it is going; it does not harbor a discriminating mind of right and wrong, beauty and ugliness. Therefore its Qi is undivided and can attain soft compliance.

Mencius (a Warring States thinker) says: “Movements such as leaping and running are Qi in activity, and in turn they disturb the human mind.” If the mind cannot command the undivided Qi, then the Qi will lose its proper course in leaping and running, and the mind will fall into agitation and arrogance and become difficult to control.

The sage is empty-hearted like a valley and accords with the affairs of the world; in his mind there is no thought of letting Qi assert its strength. Thus his quietness without confusion and peacefulness without violence—what difference is there between him and an infant? Therefore Laozi says, “Can one be like an infant?”

Mencius also says: “That vast Qi (the abundant upright Qi within the human body) is supremely great and supremely strong. Nourish it with uprightness and do not harm it, and it will fill the space between Heaven and Earth.”

Why does Laozi, when speaking of “concentrating Qi” (zhuan qi), also speak of “attaining softness” (zhi rou)? This is because one practices the Dao and righteousness with the power of supreme strength, and returns to one’s original nature through the state of supreme softness. The ancient Daoist arts are present everywhere in this.

疏义曰:《易》於《系辞》言:夫乾,其静也专。乾之所以专,以静故也,则专者静而不维之谓。杨雄於《太玄》言:和柔足以安物。柔之所以安物,以和故也,则柔者和而不暴之谓。且人生大化有四,其在婴孩欲虑未充,其居也,非有意於止也,故居不知所为。其行也,非有意於动也,故行不知所之。直情任理,无机械之心,而不藏是非美恶焉,故其气行也,非有意於动也,故行不知所之。直情任理,无机械之心,而不藏是非美恶焉,故其气静而不杂,可以政和而不暴。盖志为气之帅,志壹亦足以动气。孟子曰:蹶者趋者,是气也,而反动其心。是知专气本於心之一而不变而已。一而不变,则万物无足以挠心,而气自专矣。苟心不足以专气,则气有蹶趋之不正,心至于偾骄不可系,是犹强梁者不得荫死,尚能如婴儿乎?圣人虚己以游世,凡横逆之来,视之如虚舟飘瓦,故能守柔。而心无使气之强,则与婴儿奚择?孟子曰:其为气也,至大至刚,以直养而无害,则塞于天地之问。老氏之专气,则曰致柔,何也?盖至大所以配道,至刚所以配义。孟子言至刚,主行义言之,论气之用也。老氏言政柔,主复性言之,论气之本也盖至大所以配道,至刚所以配义。孟子言至刚,主行义言之,论气之用也。老氏言政柔,主复性言之,论气之本也。若关尹取其纯气,壶子取其衡气,言各有当,亦若是而已。古之道衍,无乎不在者,以此。
Interpretation

The Shuyi says: In the Xici of the Yijing it is said, “As for Qian, in its stillness it is undivided” (the stillness of the Qian hexagram is undivided). Qian is undivided because of its stillness; thus “undivided” means being still without being pulled along or bound.

Yang Xiong says in the Taixuan: “Harmonious softness is sufficient to pacify things.” Softness can pacify the myriad things because it is harmonious and compliant; thus “softness” means being harmonious and compliant without being violent.

Moreover, the great transformations of human life have four stages. In infancy, desires and thoughts are not yet full. When they rest, they do not intentionally seek stillness, so they do not know what they want to do; when they act, they do not intentionally seek movement, so they do not know where they are going. They act according to their nature and follow natural principle; they have no mind for cunning calculation and do not distinguish right from wrong or beauty from ugliness. Therefore their qi is pure and still, not confused, and they can attain harmony and softness without violence.

Broadly speaking, the will is the commander of qi, and a focused will is sufficient to make qi move accordingly. Mencius said: “Stumbling and running are both qi, yet they in turn move the mind.” From this we know that focusing one’s qi fundamentally depends on the mind being focused and unchanging. If the mind is focused and unchanging, the myriad things are not sufficient to disturb it, and qi naturally becomes focused as well. If the mind cannot command qi, then qi will be stumbling, impetuous, and unbalanced; if the mind is violent, arrogant, and cannot be restrained, it is like a violent and overbearing person who does not die a good death (from the Laozi: “The violent and strong do not die a good death”). How then could one be like an infant?

The sage dwells in the world with an empty mind. Whenever adverse circumstances come, he regards them as an empty boat drifting past or a broken tile flying by; therefore he can guard softness. If there is no hardness in the mind driving qi, how is that different from an infant?

Mencius said: “That flood-like qi is the greatest and most rigid. If it is cultivated with uprightness and not harmed, it fills the space between Heaven and Earth.”

Laozi speaks of “focusing qi” but calls it “attaining softness.” Why is this? Presumably the “greatest” is what matches Dao (the Way), and the “most rigid” is what matches righteousness. When Mencius speaks of the “most rigid,” he has in view the practice of Dao and righteousness and is discussing the function of qi; when Laozi speaks of “attaining softness,” he has in view the return to original nature and is discussing the substance of qi.

As for Guan Yin (the Hangu Pass keeper whom Laozi met on his westward journey and to whom the Guanyinzi is traditionally attributed), he took “pure qi”; Huzi (Liezi’s teacher, see the “Huangdi” chapter of the Liezi) took “balanced qi.” Each has his own rationale, and it is no more than this. The ancient Dao flowed and spread everywhere without being absent; it was precisely for this reason.

涤除玄览,能无疵乎? 徽宗注曰:圣人以此洗心,则涤除万行而不有。以此退藏於密,则玄览妙理而默识。若是者,体纯素而不累,过而弗悔,当而不自得也,何疵之有? 疏义曰:古之人以未始有物为未至,必极於未始有夫未始有物,然后为至,以涤除万行而不有也。以此洗心,孰有一毫之撄?以有言有迩非真,必至於忘言息透,然后为真,以玄览妙理而默识也。以此退藏於密,孰有言为之累?若是者体纯素而不累,无所与杂而不亏。其神乘时而为,虽过也,於时不得不过,故过而不悔。后为真,以玄览妙理而默识也。以此退藏於密,孰有言为之累?若是者体纯素而不累,无所与杂而不亏。其神乘时而为,虽过也,於时不得不过,故过而不悔。循理而动,其当也,於理不得不当,故当而不自得。何疵之有? 爱民治国,能无为乎? 徽宗注曰:以仁爱民,以智治国,施教化,修法则,以善一世,其於无为也难矣。圣人利泽施乎万世,不为爱人。功盖天下似不自己,故无为也,用天下而有余。
Interpretation

Cleansing and clearing the mysterious mirror—can it be without blemish?

This line means: washing away distracting thoughts and making the mind clear as a bright mirror, can one be without any flaw?

Huizong’s commentary says: When the sage washes the mind in this way, he can sweep away all actions of deliberate contrivance without clinging to them. Retiring and hiding in a profound and secret place in this way, he can clearly discern the mysterious principle and silently apprehend it. One who can do this keeps his body pure and uncarved, unentangled; if he has faults, he does not regret them, and when he succeeds, he does not take pride in it as his own gain. How then could there be any blemish?

The subcommentary explains: The ancients regarded “there has never yet been any thing” as a stage not yet reached; one must exhaust it to the point that “there is not even the thought that there has never been any thing,” and only then is it considered reached. Only thus can one sweep away all fabrication and not cling to existence. Washing the mind in this way, who could still have the slightest disturbance? People hold that things with words and traces are not true; one must reach the forgetting of words and the stilling of traces before one can be considered true. Only then can one clearly discern the mysterious principle and silently apprehend it. Retiring and hiding in profundity in this way, who would still be burdened by words? One who can do this keeps his body pure and uncarved, unentangled with the myriad things, and suffers no diminishment. His spirit moves in accordance with the times: even if he has a fault, in that situation it could not have been otherwise, and so he has faults without regret. Acting in accordance with Heavenly Principle, his conduct is fitting because in the nature of the matter it could not be otherwise; and so he hits the mark without regarding it as his own attainment. In this way, how could there be any blemish?

Loving the people and governing the state—can one practice Wuwei (non-action)?

This line means: in caring for the people and governing the state, can one practice Wuwei?

Huizong’s commentary says: To cherish the people through benevolence, govern the state through wisdom, promulgate transformative teaching, revise laws and institutions, and thereby benefit the people of one generation—this is far from Wuwei. The sage’s grace extends to ten thousand generations, yet it does not arise from a deliberate mind that “loves the people.” His achievements cover the world, yet they seem not to be his own doing; thus he can practice Wuwei, and even while governing the world he still has ample capacity.

疏义曰:爱人利物之谓仁,以仁爱民则有爱利之心矣。是是非非之谓智,以智治国则有是非之心矣。施教化固未能弃事,修法爱人利物之谓仁,以仁爱民则有爱利之心矣。是是非非之谓智,以智治国则有是非之心矣。施教化固未能弃事,修法则固未能息迸,以此善一世,皆未免乎有为,其於无为难矣。圣人不然,虽有为而不离於无为,而为出於无为,故利泽施乎万世,不为爱人。初无心於爱民,功盖天下而似不自己。初无心於治国,故无为也,用天下而有余。 天门开阖,能为雌乎? 徽宗注曰:经曰:知其雄,守其雌,为天下溪。圣人体天道之变化,巷舒启闭,不违乎时,柔刚微彰,惟其所用。然未尝先人而常随人,未尝胜物而常下物,故天下乐推而不厌, 能为雌,於是乎在。
Interpretation

The subcommentary says: To love others and benefit the myriad things is called benevolence (ren); when one uses benevolence to care for the people, there arises the intention to love others and benefit things. To be able to distinguish right from wrong is called wisdom (zhi); when one uses wisdom to govern the state, there arises a mentality that discriminates between right and wrong. In carrying out moral transformation, one certainly cannot abandon administrative affairs; in establishing laws and regulations, one cannot put an end to disturbance. Even if doing so can bring stability to one generation, none of it can avoid youwei (deliberate action); to attain Wuwei (non-action) would then be difficult. The sage, however, is different: although he too acts, he does not depart from the root of Wuwei. His action arises from Wuwei, and so his grace flows through ten thousand generations, yet he does not feel that he is deliberately loving others. Originally he has no intention of loving the people, yet his merit and virtue cover the world, and still he seems not to regard it as his own achievement. Originally he has no intention of governing the state, and therefore he can be Wuwei; yet in governing the world he still has more than enough capacity to spare.

“When the Heavenly Gate opens and closes, can one be female?” This comes from Laozi, chapter 10, and means: When the Heavenly Gate—referring to the gate through which the senses and mental thoughts enter and exit—opens and closes, can one maintain softness, stillness, and humility, like the female?

Huizong’s commentary says: The Laozi states, “Know the male, keep to the female, and become the stream of the world.” The sage discerns the changes of the Dao of Heaven: whether to contract or expand, to open or close, he follows the times, and the manifestation or concealment of hardness and softness depends entirely on how they are applied. Yet he never rushes ahead of others but always follows behind them; he never places himself above the myriad things but always willingly dwells below them. Thus the people of the world delight in elevating him and never grow weary of him. The principle of “being able to be female” lies precisely here.

疏义曰:经曰:知其雄,守其雌,为天下溪。盖雄以刚胜物,雌守柔而已。知雄而守雌,则不以刚胜物而能守柔也,故为天下溪。盖溪下地流散所聚故也。圣人兆於变化,动而以天行,则体天道之变化矣。一卷而已。知雄而守雌,则不以刚胜物而能守柔也,故为天下溪。盖溪下地流散所聚故也。圣人兆於变化,动而以天行,则体天道之变化矣。一卷一舒,一启一闭,与时迁徙,则卷舒启闭,不违其时矣。知柔知刚,知微知彰,一寓诸庸,则柔刚微彰,惟其所用矣。知持后而处先,未尝先物而尝随物;知守柔而能强,未尝胜物而尝下物。故好之无斁,天下乐推而不厌,能为雌,於是乎在。 明白四达,能无知乎? 徽宗注曰:聪明圣智,守之以愚,与此同义。 疏义曰:真知无知,而不知乃知,故能无知也,而无不知也。苟子曰:聪明圣智,守之以愚。聪所以作谋,明所以作哲,圣则事无不通,智则物无不知,聪明圣智,可谓明白四达矣。然而至人洞彻无穷而尝作哲,圣则事无不通,智则物无不知,聪明圣智,可谓明白四达矣。然而至人洞彻无穷而尝若昏焉,昭旷无外而尝用晦焉,可谓守之以愚也,非能无知而何?昔郄雍视盗,文子知不得其死,颜子如愚,仲尼称亦足以发,然则明白四达而能无知,其得持满之道乎?
Interpretation

The subcommentary says: The scriptural text states, “Knowing the male and yet willingly guarding the female, one can become the ravine of the world.” The male and strong is to overcome the ten thousand things by hardness and fierceness; the female and soft is to maintain softness and compliance. If one understands the principle of the male yet rests content in the attitude of the female, one does not subdue the ten thousand things by hardness and strength but can guard softness and weakness; thus one can become the ravine of the world. A ravine lies in a low place, where the streams of the world flow down from the heights and gather; therefore it is used as a metaphor.

The sage can perceive the signs of things’ changes; when acting, he accords with the Dao of Heaven—this is to embody the changes of the Dao of Heaven. It is like rolling up and unrolling, opening and closing, shifting with the seasons; rolling and unrolling, opening and closing never go against the proper time. He understands softness and also understands hardness; he understands the hidden and subtle and also understands the manifest and prominent. Unifying these in daily application, softness and hardness, hiddenness and manifestness can all be used as needed. He understands the principle of retiring behind others and occupying the foremost position; he never takes precedence over things but follows the ten thousand things. He understands that guarding softness can instead bring strength; he never overcomes things by force but is content to place himself below the ten thousand things. For such a person, virtue endures without becoming tiresome, and the people of the world are pleased to raise him up without growing weary. The reason one can be a person of female softness lies precisely in this.

As for the sentence “Understanding and fourfold penetration—can one be without knowledge?”, Emperor Huizong of Song (Zhao Ji) comments, “Intelligence, clear-sightedness, sageliness, and wisdom are guarded with stupidity.” The meaning is the same.

The subcommentary says: True wisdom appears as no knowledge; “not knowing” is instead true knowing. Therefore being able to be “without knowledge” is to be without anything not known. Xunzi (written “Gouzi” in the original) says, “Intelligence, clear-sightedness, sageliness, and wisdom are guarded with stupidity.” Intelligence can plan and deliberate; clear-sightedness can distinguish and analyze; sageliness can penetrate the principles of things; wisdom can know the ten thousand things. Intelligence, clear-sightedness, sageliness, and wisdom may be said to be understanding and fourfold penetration. Yet the perfected person penetrates the infinite without displaying his clear discernment; his light is broad and far-reaching without revealing its radiance. This is precisely “guarding with stupidity.” Is this not “being able to be without knowledge”? In the past, Xi Yong (a man of Jin in the Spring and Autumn period, skilled at observation) could see the first signs of thieves, and Wenzi (an ancient worthy) foreknew that such a man would not meet a good end. Yan Hui appeared dull and slow, yet Confucius said of him, “When he withdrew and examined his private conduct, it was also sufficient to elucidate [the teaching]”—that is, his private words and deeds were sufficient to expound the principle. From this, it appears that understanding and fourfold penetration while being able to be without knowledge is probably to have grasped the way of holding fullness. The way of holding fullness is the method of preserving fullness so that it does not overturn.

生之畜之,生而不有,为而不恃,长而不宰,是谓玄德。 徽宗注曰:圣人存神知化,与道同体,则配神明,育万物,无不可者。生之以遂其性,畜之以极其养。无爱利之心焉,故生而不有。无矜伐之行焉,故为而不恃。无刻制之巧焉,故长而不宰。养。无爱利之心焉,故生而不有。无矜伐之行焉,故为而不恃。无刻制之巧焉,故长而不宰。若是者,其德深矣远矣,与物反矣,故曰是谓玄德。天道升于北,则与物辫。而玄者天之色也,圣人之於天道,降而为德,非玄不足以名之。
Interpretation

Scripture: The Dao transforms and gives birth to the myriad things, nurtures them, yet does not claim them as its own; it acts, yet does not presume upon its merit; it brings the myriad things to growth, yet does not dominate them. This is “Xuan De” (mysterious De—a De that is profound, subtle, and in accord with the Dao).

Commentary: The sage can preserve spirit, comprehend the transformations of creation, and become one with the Dao; thus the sage can match spiritual intelligence and nurture the myriad things so that nothing is unfitting. By letting the myriad things each fulfill their own nature and receive full nourishment, while harboring no partiality or private gain in the heart, the sage is thus “giving birth without possessing.” Having no acts of boasting or displaying merit, the sage is thus “acting without relying on merit.” Having no clever schemes to deliberately restrict or cut down, the sage is thus “bringing to maturity without dominating.” One who can be like this has a De that is profound, far-reaching, and vast, contrary to worldly conduct; for this reason it is called “Xuan De.” Although the Dao of Heaven dwells in the north and its position belongs to the dark, it is nevertheless distinguished from the myriad things; and “xuan” is the color of Heaven. The sage models the Dao of Heaven and embodies it as De; if it were not named with “xuan,” there would be no way to describe it.

疏义曰:神妙物而不测,惟圣人存之,则与神为一。化因形而移易,惟圣人知之,则与化为#1。人存神知化,以与道同体故也。惟与道同体,则与天地合其德,而为万物之所系,虽天地神明足以配之,万物虽多足以育之,无不可者。是以其生之也,以遂其性,所谓万物之生各得其宜也。其蓄之也,为万物之所系,虽天地神明足以配之,万物虽多足以育之,无不可者。是以其生之也,以遂其性,所谓万物之生各得其宜也。其蓄之也,以极其养,所谓苟得其养,无物不长也。虽兆於动出,然自生自化,以万物为刍狗,未尝有爱人利物之心焉,孰有之哉?故生而不有。虽效於变化,然民日迁善,不知为之者,未尝有自矜自伐之行焉,孰恃之哉?故为而不恃。虽见於统一,然主治自我而大制不割,未尝有刻制之巧焉,孰宰之哉?故长而不宰。夫生之者常失於有而有之而能不有,为之者常失於恃其成也而能不恃,长之者常失於宰制雕琢而能不宰,则以微妙眇冥不可测究,出於有物之表深矣远矣,与物反矣故也。非德小而妙,孰与於此?故曰是谓玄德。《易》曰:天玄而地黄。则玄者天之色也。春为苍天,则玄者,天道之复冬,北辨之时也。圣人之於天德。《易》曰:天玄而地黄。则玄者天之色也。春为苍天,则玄者,天道之复冬,北辨之时也。圣人之於天道,降而为德,妙而小焉,天道已行矣,非玄不足以名之。
Interpretation

The numinous and wondrous is hard to fathom. Only the sage can hold fast to his Shen (spirit) and thereby become one with Shen; transformation follows the forms of the myriad things and changes, and only the sage comprehends its principle and thereby connects with the Way of transformation and nurture. The sage can hold Shen and know transformation because he shares one body with Dao (the Way, the cosmic source and principle of operation). Sharing one body with Dao, he can unite his De with Heaven and Earth and become the center to which the myriad things return. The spiritual powers of Heaven and Earth are sufficient to match him, and though the myriad things are many, he is sufficient to nurture them; there is nothing he cannot do. Therefore, when he causes the myriad things to grow, he can complete their natures—this is what is meant by “all things each attain what is fitting for them.” He nourishes the myriad things in order to exhaust the work of nurture, as it is said: “Once they receive nurture, there is nothing that does not grow.”

Although the myriad things appear through movement, they are self-generating and self-transforming. The sage regards them like straw dogs (the grass dogs used in ancient sacrifice, discarded once used and not treasured), without a deliberate mind to love people or benefit things—how then could he have any thought of possession? Hence it is said: “He generates but does not possess.” Although the sage’s transforming De manifests amid change, the common people daily turn toward goodness without feeling who is bringing it about, and the sage never boasts of himself—what then could he rely upon? Hence it is said: “He acts but does not depend on it.” After all under Heaven is unified, governance arises from spontaneity; the institutions of the great Dao are whole and not split apart, and the sage has no craft of carving and engraving—who then would be the master? Hence it is said: “He rears but does not dominate.”

Whoever gives birth to and nurtures the myriad things often loses something because of clinging to tangible things; to give birth and nurture without taking possession is true excellence. Whoever fashions the myriad things often loses something because of clinging to results; not to rely on success is true excellence. Whoever rears and nurtures the myriad things often loses something through domination and carving; not to dominate is true excellence. This De is subtle, profound, and hard to fathom; it goes beyond the surface of things, is deep and remote, and runs contrary to worldly things. If its De were not minute and subtly wondrous, who could do these things? Therefore it is called “Xuan De” (profound and subtle De). The Yi says: “Heaven is xuan and Earth is yellow.” Xuan is the color of Heaven. Spring belongs to the azure heaven, while the xuan color represents winter and the north, when the Dao of Heaven returns to its source. The sage’s realization of heavenly De is likewise: the Dao of Heaven descends as De, subtle and minute, and the Dao of Heaven already operates within it; apart from “xuan,” nothing is sufficient to describe it.

三十辐章第十一 三十辐共一毂,当其无,有车之用;涎坛以为器,当其无,有器之用;凿户牖以为室,当其无,有室之用。 徽宗注曰:有无一政,利用出入,是谓至神。有无异相,在有为体,在无为用,阴阳之运,万物之理也。车之用在运,器之用在盛,室之用在虚,妙用出於至无,变化藏於不累,如镒无象,因物显照,至人用心,每解乎此。
Interpretation

Thirty spokes (the wooden bars connecting the outer rim of a wheel to its center) converge on a hub (the round wooden block at the center of the wheel through which the axle passes); precisely because the center is empty, the cart can move. Kneading clay to make vessels, precisely because the center is empty, the vessel can hold things. Cutting out doors and windows to build a house, precisely because the center is empty, the house can be lived in.

Emperor Huizong of Song, Zhao Ji, comments: Being and non-being are originally the same principle; the two are used alternately, and through their coming and going they generate one another. This is called “Zhishen” (the most mysterious and unfathomable realm). The manifestations of being and non-being differ: “being” is the substantial body of things, while “non-being” is their function. The movement and transformation of Yin-Yang are precisely where the principle of all things lies. The function of the cart lies in movement, the function of the vessel lies in holding, and the function of the house lies in its empty interior. Mysterious function arises within the utmost emptiness and utmost non-being; the mechanism of transformation is hidden in a place free from entanglement. Just as a bright mirror has no fixed image and shows its illumination according to the differences among things, the mind of the Zhiren (a person of the highest Daoist attainment) can constantly comprehend this principle.

The Shuyi subcommentary further says: If viewed through the eyes of “Zhishen,” the myriad things appear to exist but are not truly existent; they appear to be nonexistent but are not truly nonexistent; within the hidden and subtle there is emptiness. The mysterious function comes forth from the utmost non-being; the mechanism of transformation is hidden in a place free from entanglement, just as a bright mirror has no form and reflects according to things. The mind of the Zhiren can constantly comprehend this principle.

疏义曰:即至神以观之,意其有而非有,意其无而非无,冥有虚,妙用出於至无,变化藏於不累,如镒无象,因物显照,至人用心,每解乎此。 疏义曰:即至神以观之,意其有而非有,意其无而非无,冥有与无而利用皆所自出入,则有无一致,利用出入,是谓至神也。即阴阳万物以观之,显而可见,斯谓之有;幽而不测,斯谓之无。别有无於异相,在有为体,在无为用,阴阳之运,万物之理也。故三十辐共一毂,涎坛以为器,凿户牖以为室,皆显於有者也,车与器室利在是焉。然车之所以运,器之所以盛,室之所以虚,果何物哉?妙用出於至无,而莫睹其端倪;变化藏於不累,而莫窥其畛域。如镒无像,因物显照,不将不迎,应所以虚,果何物哉?妙用出於至无,而莫睹其端倪;变化藏於不累,而莫窥其畛域。如镒无像,因物显照,不将不迎,应而不藏,固非有也,亦非无也,应物而不伤斯已矣。至人用心,每解乎此。 故有之以为利,无之以为用。 徽宗注曰:有则实,无则虚,实故具貌像声色而有质,虚故能运量酬醉而不穷。天地之间,道以器显,故无不废有;器以道妙,故有必归无。木挠而水润,火焕而金坚,土均而布,稼穑出焉,此有也,而人赖以为利。天之所以运,地之所以处,四时之所以行,百物之所以昌,孰尸之者?此无也。而世莫睹其述,故其用不匮。有无之相生,老氏於此三者,推而明之。
Interpretation

The Subcommentary says: If viewed from the perspective of the most wondrous Shen (spirit), it seems to be “being,” yet it is not truly being; it seems to be “non-being,” yet it is not truly non-being. Being and non-being are mysteriously united as one, and their functions all arise from its coming and going. Thus being and non-being are fundamentally one, and function and coming-and-going are wholly interpenetrating. This is what is called the utmost Shen. Viewed from the perspective of Yin-Yang and the myriad things, what is manifest and visible is called “being,” while what is hidden and unfathomable is called “non-being.” When distinguishing being and non-being within the appearances of formed things, being serves as the support of bodily form, and non-being as the root of function. The operation of Yin-Yang and the principles of the myriad things are all like this.

Thus, when thirty spokes converge on a single hub, when clay is kneaded to make vessels, and when doors and windows are cut to make a house, all these are manifest as “being,” and the usefulness of the cart, the vessel, and the room lies precisely here. Yet what is the root of the cart’s ability to move, the vessel’s ability to hold things, and the room’s ability to be empty and habitable? Wondrous function originates in ultimate non-being, yet its beginnings cannot be seen; transformation lies hidden in a place free from entanglement, yet its boundaries cannot be peered into. It is like a mirror without a fixed image: it reflects according to things, neither welcoming nor rejecting, responding to things while empty, retaining nothing. Therefore it is truly neither “being” nor “non-being”; it simply responds to things without being harmed. The perfected person, in the exercise of the mind, constantly apprehends this principle.

Emperor Huizong’s Commentary says: Being is substantive, while non-being is vacuous. The substantive is what supplies forms and appearances, sounds and colors, and gives them a physical body; the vacuous is what enables movement, containment, and response without exhaustion. Between heaven and earth, the Dao (the Way) manifests through vessels and objects, so there is no non-being that does not depend on being; vessels and objects become wondrous through the Dao, so being must return to non-being. The bending and stretching of Wood, the moistening of Water, the flaming of Fire, the hardness of Metal, and the spreading of Earth that brings growth and harvest—all these are “being,” and people rely on them for benefit. But the movement of heaven, the stability of earth, the succession of the four seasons, and the flourishing of the hundred things—who governs them? This is “non-being.” The people of the world do not see its traces, and therefore its function is never exhausted. Being and non-being generate each other; Laozi elaborated and clarified this.

疏义曰:有则有碍,无适非实;无则无间,无适非虚。实故具貌像声色而有质,有之以为利故也。虚故能运量酬醉而不穷,无之以为用故也。目道而降域於两间,形而上者不离於有,具貌像声色而有质,有之以为利故也。虚故能运量酬醉而不穷,无之以为用故也。目道而降域於两间,形而上者不离於有,在无亦显也,故道以器显,无不废有;形而下者不外於无,在有亦藏也,故器以道妙,有必归无。散为五行,水火为用,金木为器,土谷为利,木挠而水润,火焕而金坚,土均而布,稼穑出焉。凡在天地之问,孰不资焉?故人赖以为利。降於域中,天其运乎,地其处乎,四时行焉,百物生焉,若有机缄而不得已,若运转而不能自止,孰尸之者?皆天也。故世莫睹其进焉,虽然,无即妙有,有即真无,有无相生,若循环然。天地之大,秋毫之小,未有逃此者。即车之运,器之盛,室之容以明之,几天下之物所以运,所以盛,所以容可以类知矣。老氏於斯三者,推而明之,举一以知万故也即车之运,器之盛,室之容以明之,几天下之物所以运,所以盛,所以容可以类知矣。老氏於斯三者,推而明之,举一以知万故也。 五色章第十二 五色令人目盲,五音令人耳聋,
Interpretation

Chapter Twelve: The Five Colors

The five variegated colors dazzle and confuse people’s eyes, so that instead they cannot see the true nature of things; the five pleasing sounds clog and dull people’s ears and eyes, so that instead they cannot hear the sounds of nature. (The Five Colors refer to blue-green, yellow, red, white, and black; the Five Tones refer to gong, shang, jue, zhi, and yu.) These two lines are Laozi’s warning against the excessive pursuit of sensory pleasure, emphasizing that external stimulation from sounds and colors damages people’s original nature.

徽宗注曰:目围二焉,其见者性也,彻而为明则作哲,足以断天下之疑。耳藏一焉,其闻者性也,彻而为聪则作谋,足以通天下之志。睹道之人,无形之上,独以神视,无声之表,独以气听,而视听有不待耳目之用者,曾何声色之足蔽哉?世之人役耳目於外物之累,故目淫於五色,耳淫於五音,而聪明为之衰,其於盲聋也何辩? 疏义曰:离再索得女,外奇内耦,其象为目,则目围二也。取诸八物为火,火则其光外景,故在性为见。目彻为明
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of Song (Zhao Ji) comments: Around the eye are the images of two yang lines, and in the middle is the nature that can see. When this nature is penetrating and clear and issues as brightness, it is called “zhe” (clear discernment), sufficient to resolve the doubts of the world. In the ear there is only one principal aperture (symbolizing the single yang in the Kan trigram), and what can hear is also this nature. When this nature is penetrating and clear and issues as acuity, it is called “mou” (skill in planning), sufficient to penetrate the minds of all under Heaven.

Those who realize the Dao, beyond formed things, use Shen (spirit) alone to see; beyond sound, use primal Qi alone to hear. In this way, seeing and hearing no longer depend on the functions of the ears and eyes—how then could they be obscured by sounds and colors? People in the world are driven by entanglement with external things; their eyes sink into the five colors and their ears sink into the five tones, and so their acuity declines. How are they different from the blind and the deaf?

The Daode Zhenjing Shuyi (Commentary on the Meaning of the True Scripture of the Dao and De, written by Chu Boxiu of the Southern Song) explains: The Li trigram (one of the Bagua, symbolizing fire and light) is derived from Qian and Kun and, by further seeking among the trigram lines, is obtained as the “middle daughter.” Its outer two lines are yang (odd lines), and its middle line is yin (even line); its shape resembles the eye, and so it is said that around the eye are two yang lines. The Li trigram takes fire as its image; the nature of fire is that its light and flame shine outward.

疏义曰:离再索得女,外奇内耦,其象为目,则目围二也。取诸八物为火,火则其光外景,故在性为见。目彻为明,明以作哲,故足以断天下之疑,五色孰得以乱其明?坎再索得男,外耦内奇,其象为耳,则耳藏一也。取诸八物为水,水则其明内烛,故在性为闻。耳彻为聪,聪以作谋,故足以通天下之志,五音孰得以汨其聪?睹道之人解乎此,造见见之妙,无形之上,独以神视,故能见不见之形;造闻闻之妙,无声之表,独以气听,故能闻无声之声。无所不见,无所不闻,视听不用耳目,而所见所闻无适非真,普何声色之足蔽哉之形;造闻闻之妙,无声之表,独以气听,故能闻无声之声。无所不见,无所不闻,视听不用耳目,而所见所闻无适非真,普何声色之足蔽哉?世之人所见不能胜,所睹不知闻,和於无声,役耳目於外物之累,悦明而淫於色,孰知天下之正色?悦聪而淫於声,孰知天下之大音?作聪明而聪明日衰,则不聪实无耳也,不明实无目也,其於聋盲奚择?虽然人者自盲聋尔,岂声音之能聋盲人哉。 五味令人口爽,驰骋田猎令人心发狂,
Interpretation

This passage uses the trigram images of the Zhouyi to explain the original nature of the ears and eyes.

The Li trigram is the trigram obtained by “the second seeking, obtaining a daughter” (that is, the middle daughter). On the outside is a yang line (“odd”), and in the middle is a yin line (“even”); its shape resembles an eye. Hence it is said that “the eye has a double enclosure,” meaning that the eye has two outlines. Among the things symbolized by the Bagua (Eight Trigrams), the Li trigram is associated with “fire”; the light of fire shines outward, and thus in human nature it corresponds to “seeing.” When the eye is clear it is bright, and brightness further gives rise to wisdom, so it can resolve the doubts of the world. How could the five colors disturb its brightness?

The Kan trigram is the trigram obtained by “the second seeking, obtaining a son” (that is, the middle son). On the outside is a yin line, and in the middle is a yang line; its shape resembles an ear. Hence it is said that a yang line is stored within the ear. The Kan trigram is associated with “water”; the clear light of water shines within, and thus in human nature it corresponds to “hearing.” When the ear is clear it is acute, and acuteness further gives rise to strategy, so it can comprehend the minds of all people in the world. How could the five tones disturb its acuteness?

One who grasps this understands the subtlety of “seeing”: beyond the formed, one observes with Shen (spirit), and thus can see forms that cannot be seen. One understands the subtlety of “hearing”: beyond sound, one listens with Qi (vital energy), and thus can hear the soundless sound. Nothing is unseen, nothing is unheard; seeing and hearing do not depend on the ears and eyes, and whatever is seen or heard is wholly true. How then could any sound or color obscure it?

People in the world see only the appearances before their eyes, and what they perceive cannot penetrate to the underlying principle. They are cut off from the realm of the soundless, and their ears and eyes are entangled and enslaved by external things. Addicted to visual sensation and infatuated with beautiful colors, how can they know the true proper color of the world? Addicted to auditory sensation and infatuated with sounds, how can they know the greatest sound of the world? If they merely exercise their keenness and intelligence, that keenness and intelligence instead decline day by day. When the ear is not acute, it is in effect as if there were no ear; when the eye is not clear, it is in effect as if there were no eye. How is this different from the deaf and the blind? Yet it is people themselves who make themselves blind and deaf; it is not sounds that can make them blind and deaf.

The final sentence comes from Laozi, chapter 12: “The five flavors make the mouth fail (the sense of taste becomes abnormal); galloping and hunting make the mind go mad.” The meaning is: excessive fine flavors corrupt the sense of taste, and excessive hunting and amusement derange the mind.

徽宗注曰:道之出口,淡乎其无味。五味,人之所同嗜也,而厚味实腊毒,故令人。爽。人之生也,形不盈仞,而心伴造化。圣人之心,动而纬万方,静而镒五味,人之所同嗜也,而厚味实腊毒,故令人。爽。人之生也,形不盈仞,而心伴造化。圣人之心,动而纬万方,静而镒天地。世之人从事於田猎,而因以丧其良心,不足以自胜,可不谓大哀也耶? 疏义曰:人食刍豢,麋鹿食荐,鲫蛆食蛇,鸱鸦嗜鼠,四者孰知天下之正味?所谓正味,即道之出口淡乎其无味是也。人皆知味之所味者有同嗜,而不知有味味者存,故以刍豢稻粱为足美。然而厚味寔腊毒,虽可以养。体,而失其大体矣。此五味令人。爽也。盖爽,差也,口爽则失其所谓正味矣。且人之生眇乎小哉,所以属於人,则形不盈仞也。謷乎大哉,独成其天,则心伴造化也。圣人尽心之真,动而纬万方,则周流无问,静而镒天地,则旁烛无疆,方且御六气之辨,以游无穷,尚何从事於田猎之间为哉?昧者不知,自胜为强,徒以习驰逐为务则旁烛无疆,方且御六气之辨,以游无穷,尚何从事於田猎之间为哉?昧者不知,自胜为强,徒以习驰逐为务,或蹶趋以动其心,而不能自得,良心亦从而丧矣,可不谓大哀耶? 难得之货令人行妨。
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong’s Commentary

When the Dao is spoken from the mouth, it is bland and without flavor. The five flavors are what people commonly delight in, but rich and heavy delicacies are in fact poison, and so they spoil people’s taste. People live in the world with bodies that are tiny, no more than seven chi, yet their minds can companion the creative transformations of Heaven and Earth—the process by which Heaven and Earth generate the myriad things. The mind of the sage: when it moves, it reaches all directions; when still, it mirrors Heaven and Earth. People of the world drown in hunting, and thereby lose their original mind and cannot restrain themselves. Is this not a great sorrow?

Explanation of the Meaning

Humans eat grain-fed livestock; deer eat wild grass; carp eat maggots; owls and crows love mice. Among these four kinds of creatures, which one understands the true correct flavor of the world? The so-called correct flavor is simply the realm in which the Dao is “bland and without flavor.” People know only that tastes have common preferences, but they do not know that beyond tasting there is something fundamental that exists; therefore they regard fodder-fed animals—meat foods such as beef, mutton, pork, and dog—and rice and millet—fine grains—as delicious. Yet rich and heavy flavors are truly poison: although they can nourish the body, they cause one to lose the root of the body. This is what is meant by “the five flavors make people’s mouths go wrong.” “Shuang” means error; once the taste has erred, one loses the correct flavor.

Human life is very small: as far as the person’s body is concerned, the physical form is no more than seven chi; but if one can complete one’s nature on one’s own, the mind can companion creative transformation. The sage devotes his heart fully to the true Dao: when he moves, he circulates through all directions and there is nowhere he does not penetrate; when still, he illuminates Heaven and Earth without bound. He is just about to harness the six natural qi of Heaven and Earth—yin, yang, wind, rain, darkness, and light—and roam in the realm of the infinite; how then would he still act in hunting? The foolish do not understand this; they take surpassing others as strength and focus only on practicing galloping and chasing, or because of running about they agitate their minds, cannot attain self-possession, and their good conscience is lost with it. Is this not a great sorrow?

Scriptural Text

Rare goods cause people’s conduct to be hindered. (“Xingfang” means that people’s actions are obstructed and their moral conduct is damaged.) This sentence only sets forth the principle that precious and hard-to-obtain things disturb the human mind and cause people to deviate from their original nature.

徽宗注曰:利以养人,而货以化之,故交利而俱赡。圣人不贵难得之货,不贵异物,贱用物,欲人之安其分而无所夺也。贵难得之货,则至於次性命之情,而饕贵富,何行之能守?故令人行妨。仲虺之称汤曰:不殖货利。孔子之谓子贡曰:赐不受命而货殖焉。货之妨行如此。 疏义曰:先王懋迁,有无化居,所以阜通货贿,使交利而俱赡也。盖利所以养人,而化之则为货,故交利而俱赡。难得之货,衣之不可衣,食之不可食,苟以是为贵,则至於次性命之情而饕富贵,攘夺诞谩,无所不至,欲民安性命之情,惟行之为守,难矣。然则圣人不贵异物、贱用物者无他,欲人之安饕富贵,攘夺诞谩,无所不至,欲民安性命之情,惟行之为守,难矣。然则圣人不贵异物、贱用物者无他,欲人之安其分而无所夺也。是以捐金於巉嵁之山,投珠於五湖之渊,不贵难得之货,使人我之养毕足而止,孰有行妨者哉?仲虺之称汤曰:不殖货利。则以动不为利正大人之行也。孔子谓子贡曰:赐不受命而货殖焉。则以喻於利非君子之所为也。庄子所以欲擿玉毁珠,而贵夫不利货财者,以此。 是以圣人为腹不为目,故去彼取此。 徽宗注曰:八卦坤为腹,以厚载而容也。离为目,以外视擿玉毁珠,而贵夫不利货财者,以此。
Interpretation

The commentary by Emperor Huizong of Song says: Benefit is meant to nourish people, and goods are the concrete form of benefit. The two can transform into each other, and so they are mutually beneficial and together provide nourishment. The sage does not value goods that are hard to obtain, does not treasure extraordinary things, and makes light of useless things, hoping that people will rest content in their proper station and not contend for what belongs to others. If rare goods are valued, the authentic nature of life is endangered; if one greedily seeks wealth and honor without cease, how can one hold fast to proper conduct? Therefore it is said that goods harm virtue. Zhong Hui, the left minister of Tang of Shang, praised Shang Tang, saying, “He did not accumulate goods and profit.” Confucius said to his disciple Zigong, that is, Duanmu Ci, “Ci does not accept Heaven’s mandate, yet engages in trade and accumulation.” Such is how goods harm conduct.

The sub-commentary says: The ancient former kings strove to circulate wealth and goods so that supplies could pass between those who had and those who lacked and each thing could find its place. Their aim was to promote the circulation of goods and enable people to benefit one another and be commonly enriched. Benefit is originally meant to nourish people; only after it is transformed into goods can there be mutual profit and common sufficiency. As for those hard-to-obtain goods, they cannot be worn as clothing or eaten as grain. If people treat them as precious, they endanger the authentic nature of life; greed for wealth and honor, contention, and deceit will then lead them to do anything. To make the common people content in the authentic nature of life, one must take non-seeking as one’s discipline, and this is truly difficult. This being so, the sage does not treasure extraordinary things and makes light of daily-use articles for no other reason than the hope that people will rest content in their proper station and not have anything taken from them by others. Therefore he casts gold into steep mountain gorges and pearls into the deep abyss of the Five Lakes—a general reference to the large lakes around Taihu—not valuing hard-to-obtain goods, so that mutual support among people stops once it is sufficient. Who then would do anything harmful to conduct? When Zhong Hui praised Shang Tang for “not accumulating goods and profit,” he meant that action should not put benefit first; this is the conduct of an upright and magnanimous person. When Confucius told Zigong, “Ci does not accept Heaven’s mandate but engages in commerce,” he meant that pursuing profit is not what a gentleman does. This is why Zhuangzi, a representative Daoist figure of the Warring States period, advocated smashing jade and destroying pearls and honored those who did not pursue wealth and goods.

Therefore the sage values the belly and does not value the eyes; he rejects what is seen externally by the eyes and takes inner fullness instead. The commentary by Emperor Huizong of Song says: Among the Bagua (Eight Trigrams, the eight basic trigrams of the Zhouyi), the Kun trigram symbolizes the belly because it is heavy and substantial, bears and contains; the Li trigram symbolizes the eyes because it looks outward.

是以圣人为腹不为目,故去彼取此。 徽宗注曰:八卦坤为腹,以厚载而容也。离为目,以外视而明也。厚载而容,则无所不受。外视而明,则有所不及。圣人以天下为度,故取此能容之腹,非事事而治之,物物而察之也。故去彼外视之目。庄子曰:贼莫大於德有心,而心有眼。故圣人去之。 疏义曰:坤厚载物,含万物而化光,近取诸身则为腹,以厚载而容也。外阳内阴,明两作为离,近取诸身则为目,以外视而明故也。厚载而容,则未尝有择,收而积之,亡处亡块,故无所不受。外视而明,则不能无辨,能见百步之外,而不能自见其睫,故有所不及。圣人泯是非,一好恶,以天下为度,故取此能容之腹,无所次择,无所去取,非能无辨,能见百步之外,而不能自见其睫,故有所不及。圣人泯是非,一好恶,以天下为度,故取此能容之腹,无所次择,无所去取,非事事而治之,物物而察之也。故去彼外视之目。庄子曰:贼莫大於德有心,而心有眼。盖开天者德生,开人者贼生,心有眼则开人而贼生也,故圣人不为目。 宠辱章第十三 宠辱若惊,贵大患若身。
Interpretation

The sage values inner bearing and containment and does not become immersed in external sensory pursuits. Thus he discards the outward-gazing “eyes” and chooses the “belly” that can contain all things.

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: In the Bagua (Eight Trigrams), the Kun trigram—one of the Eight Trigrams of the Zhouyi, symbolizing earth—corresponds to the human belly: thick and heavy, bearing and containing, able to embrace. The Li trigram—also one of the Eight Trigrams, symbolizing brightness—corresponds to the human eyes: looking outward, able to discern clearly. To bear and contain means that everything can be accepted; to look outward means there will always be something unseen. The sage takes all under heaven as his measure, and so chooses the containing “belly”; he does not govern every affair or scrutinize every thing, and therefore discards the outward-gazing “eyes.” Zhuangzi says: “There is no greater harm than harboring private intentions, and then causing eyes to arise within the heart.” Therefore the sage removes this mind’s eye.

The subcommentary further expounds: The Kun trigram is thick and heavy, bearing and nurturing the myriad things so that they transform and grow; in the human body it is the belly. The Li trigram is yang on the outside and yin within, with brightness doubled; in the human body it is the eyes. When the belly bears and contains, it makes no selection but stores and gathers everything, and so there is nothing it does not receive. When the eyes look outward, they must make distinctions: they can see beyond a hundred paces, yet cannot see their own eyelashes, and so there is something they do not reach. The sage erases the distinctions of right and wrong and unifies the feelings of like and dislike; taking all under heaven as his measure, he therefore takes only the containing “belly.” He does not pick and choose—not because he wishes to govern every affair and inspect every thing—and so he discards the outward-looking “eyes.” Zhuangzi says: “Once eyes arise in the heart, one will guide others with a discriminating mind, and thereby breed harm.” To follow what is natural is for De to arise; to use human cleverness to guide others is for harm to arise. Therefore the sage does not use the eyes.

Chapter 13 opens: “Favor and disgrace both unsettle the mind; one treats great calamity as important as oneself.”

徽宗注曰:宠者在下,贵者在上,居宠而以为荣,则辱矣。处贵而以为累,则息莫大焉。以富为是者,不能辞禄,以显为是者,不能辞名。亲权者,不能与人柄,操之则上,居宠而以为荣,则辱矣。处贵而以为累,则息莫大焉。以富为是者,不能辞禄,以显为是者,不能辞名。亲权者,不能与人柄,操之则栗,舍之则悲,兹宠辱所以若惊欤?惨怛之疾,恬愉之安,时集於体,休迫之恐,欣欢之喜,交溺於心,兹大息所以若身欤?
Interpretation

Favor and disgrace are both bestowed by the outside world; those of high status stand above, while those who receive favor stand below. If, while being favored, one takes this as an honor, one is inviting disgrace. To occupy a noble position and yet regard it as a burden—there is no calamity greater than this. Those who love wealth will not decline a salary; those who love prominence will not decline an empty name. Those who firmly grasp authority will not hand it over to others. While holding it, they tremble inwardly; when letting it go, they grieve. This is why favor and disgrace alarm people. Painful illness and comfortable pleasure often come upon the body together; fear born of coercion and joy born of delight alternately sink into the heart. This is the principle Laozi speaks of: “value great trouble as the body.” The reason great trouble cannot be shaken off, just like the body, is precisely that it accompanies the body.

疏义曰:宠者人之所荣,在下之道也。贵者人之所累,在上之道也。居宠而以为荣,则席其宠矣,席其庞则辱。或随之处贵而以为累,则矜其贵矣,矜其贵则息莫大焉。以富为是者,不能辞禄,累於厚利故也。以显为是者,不能辞名,累於高名故也。亲权者,不能与人柄,以权势不尤,则夸者悲故也。於是三者操之则栗,所谓既得之,息失之也;舍之则悲,所谓寄去则不乐累於高名故也。亲权者,不能与人柄,以权势不尤,则夸者悲故也。於是三者操之则栗,所谓既得之,息失之也;舍之则悲,所谓寄去则不乐也。兹宠辱所以若惊欤?集於体者,非有惨怛之疾,为阴阳之寇,则有恬愉之安。涉人道之息溺於心者,非有休迫之恐,以毗於阴,则有欣欢之喜,以偏于阳,一身之息丛起交攻,贵而以为之累,其息亦若此而已。此大息所以若身欤? 何谓宠辱?宠为下。 徽宗注曰:龙之为物,变化自如,不可制畜,可古覆焉,则志於豢养,有辱之道。古之善为士者,三旌之位不足易其介,万锺之禄不足迁其守,居宠而思危,在福而若冲,则何辱之有?食夫位也,慕夫禄也,知进而不知退,知得而不知丧,则人贱之矣。故受宠於人,则为下之道。
Interpretation

Favor and disgrace both arise from external things; if people take them too seriously, they become restless as if startled. To be favored and valued by others is the normal condition of those in a lower position; to occupy a high position is often to be burdened by responsibility.

If one regards being favored as glory, one becomes dependent on that favor and, once it is lost, feels disgraced. If those in high positions become arrogant on this account and treat their status as capital, that is even more a source of trouble. Those greedy for wealth will not decline a salary and are burdened by rich profit; those who covet eminence will not decline fame and are burdened by high reputation; those close to power will not hand over authority, because once power is gone, those who boasted of power will grieve. These three things, when held in hand, constantly cause trembling and fear of loss—this is what is meant by “gaining them, one worries about losing them.” After relinquishing them, one grieves again—this is what is meant by entrusting oneself to external things, so that one is unhappy without them. This is probably why favor and disgrace startle people.

Bodily pain and illness are either severe disease or harm caused by an imbalance of Yin-Yang; when the body is peaceful, one feels comfortable and glad. The human mind is disturbed by worldly affairs: if not fearful because of excessive constraint, then excited because of excessive joy. Within one body, various troubles attack one another; those of noble status treat it as a burden, and their troubles are no more than this. This is probably why Laozi says, “The great calamity is like the body”: because one has this body, these troubles arise.

Then what are favor and disgrace? Favor is the manifestation of being in a lower position.

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: The dragon transforms freely and cannot be tamed. If it is domesticated and controlled by people, its aspiration is reduced to being fed—this is the path of disgrace. In antiquity, those who truly knew how to be scholars could not have their integrity changed even by the high rank of the Three Ducal Offices (the Three Banners), nor their conduct shaken even by a stipend of ten thousand measures of grain. When in favor, they still thought of danger; when in blessing, they still remained humble—how then could disgrace arise? Those who covet high rank, envy rich stipends, know only how to advance and not how to retreat, know only how to gain and not how to lose—others will slight them. Therefore accepting the favor of others is precisely the manifestation of being in a lower position.

疏义曰:行天莫如龙,合则成体,位也,慕夫禄也,知进而不知退,知得而不知丧,则人贱之矣。故受宠於人,则为下之道。 疏义曰:行天莫如龙,合则成体,散则成章,此变化自如,不可制蓄也。能见而不能港,未离乎内覆,可豢之以驾驭服乘,则未免有悔,此可古覆焉,则志於豢养,有辱之道也。宠之所以为辱,以是故尔。是以善为士者,三旌之位不足易其介,知在我者有贵於三旌之位也。万锺之禄不足迁其守,知在我者有富於万锺之禄也。得持宠之术则居宠而思危,知保福之道则在福而若冲,故能富贵不离其身,而福禄能长且久,何辱之有哉?苟或食夫位而诬伪以取贵,慕夫禄而责污以取富,知进不知退,昧消长之理,知得不知丧,蔽盈虚之数,则赵孟之贵,赵孟能贱之。故受宠於人,则为下之道。 得之若惊,失之若惊,是谓宠辱若惊。 徽宗注曰:轩冕在身赵孟能贱之。故受宠於人,则为下之道。 得之若惊,失之若惊,是谓宠辱若惊。 徽宗注曰:轩冕在身,非性命之理也。物之傥来寄也,寄之来不可拒,故至人不以得为悦。其去不可圉,故至人不以失为忧。今寄去则不乐,受而喜之,是以得失累乎其心,能勿惊乎?柳下惠为士师,三黜而不去,正考父三命,循墙而走,则异於此。
Interpretation

This passage first uses the dragon as a metaphor: dragons travel in the sky; when they gather, they form a single whole, and when they disperse, they display various patterns. They transform freely and cannot be controlled or hoarded by people. If one can only see them but cannot grasp them, and has not yet escaped “inner covering” (the state of being obscured and entangled by external things), one may be domesticated by others and used for driving carriages or riding, and will inevitably regret it. To regard oneself as an animal that can be domesticated and single-mindedly seek to be tamed is to invite humiliation upon oneself. This is precisely why favor turns into humiliation.

Therefore, one who is skilled at being a scholar, even if granted the Three Pennants (three banners, indicating high rank), cannot have his integrity changed, because he knows that what is precious in himself is more valuable than the position of the Three Pennants. Even if given ten thousand zhong (an ancient salary unit, indicating a generous stipend), his conduct cannot be shaken, because he knows that what he possesses in himself is richer than the salary of ten thousand zhong. One who understands the way to preserve favor still constantly harbors fear while in favor; one who understands the principle of preserving blessing remains humble, yielding, empty, and still while in blessing. Thus he can possess wealth and honor without losing them from himself, and his blessings and salary endure—how then could there still be humiliation?

If someone relies on official position and resorts to falsehood to seek prominence, craves salary and seeks wealth through corrupt conduct, knows only advance and not retreat, and does not understand the principle of things’ waxing and waning; knows only gain and not loss, and does not understand the fixed measure of fullness and deficiency—then even with the prominence of a Zhao Meng, Zhao Meng could make him base. Therefore, accepting favor from others is the principle of being in a lower position.

“To be startled when gaining favor and startled when losing it—this is called being startled by favor and disgrace.”

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: Such external things as carriages, horses, caps, and ceremonial regalia are not the true principle of nature and life. External things come to one by chance and lodge temporarily in me; when they come, they cannot be refused; when they leave, they cannot be stopped. Therefore the perfected person does not rejoice at gain nor grieve at loss. But now, if one is unhappy as soon as an external thing departs and rejoices when receiving it, then gain and loss entangle the mind—how can one not be startled? Liu Xiahui served as a judicial officer and was dismissed three times yet did not leave; Zheng Kaofu received appointment three times, and the higher his position, the more humble he became, walking with quick small steps along the wall—both were different from such a person.

疏义曰:至贵在我,足以并国爵,则轩冕在身,非性命之理也。外物不可铃,而求无益於得,以物之傥来寄也。惟时无止,则寄之来不可拒其得之也,於我何加?故至人不以得为悦。惟分无常,则寄之去不可圉,其失之也,於我何损?故至人不以失为忧。昧者不知穷通,如寒暑之序,寄去寄之去不可圉,其失之也,於我何损?故至人不以失为忧。昧者不知穷通,如寒暑之序,寄去则不乐,或陨获於贫贱,受而喜之,或充诎於富贵,得失交战於胸中,灵台且为之窒,其不惊者几希。柳下惠为士师,三黜而不去,正考父三命,循墙而走,岂以得失累其心哉? 何谓贵大患若身? 徽宗注曰:据利势,擅赏罚,作福威,天下畏之如神明,尊之如上帝,可谓贵矣。圣人则不以贵自累,故能长守贵而无息。譬如人身堕肢体,黜聪明,离形去智,通於大同,则无入而不自得也。世之人以物易性,故累物而不能忘势,以形累心,故丧心而不能忘形,其患大矣。
Interpretation

I. On Gain and Loss

Even if the most honorable station were to fall to me, even if I could annex the feudal lords and enjoy noble rank, the carriages, horses, and ceremonial caps that attach to the person are still not the fundamental principle of life. Things outside the self can never be firmly tied down; to pursue them single-mindedly brings no benefit to acquisition, for they are merely temporarily lodged in me. The turning of time and fortune does not pause; when external things come, there is no need to reject them—what do they add to my nature when they arrive? Therefore the perfected person does not rejoice at gain. Titles and station are likewise not permanent; when external things depart, they cannot be stopped—what do they diminish in me when they are lost? Therefore the perfected person does not grieve at loss.

The foolish do not understand the principle of adversity and success, which is as natural as cold coming and heat going. When external things depart, their hearts are displeased; some, placed in poverty and lowliness and fallen into hardship, accept it and instead rejoice; some, placed in wealth and honor, feel oppressed, and thoughts of gain and loss wage war within their breasts, so that even the clear and bright place of the mind is blocked. Those who can remain unperturbed by this are truly few. Liuxia Hui (a worthy man of Lu in the Spring and Autumn period, who once served as shishi, the officer in charge of criminal justice) was dismissed three times but did not leave; Zheng Kaofu (a grandee of Song in the Spring and Autumn period) was promoted three times, yet each time bowed lower and walked in small steps close to the wall—how could they let gain and loss burden their hearts?

II. What Does “Valuing Great Calamity as the Body” Mean?

Emperor Huizong’s commentary says: Relying on power and profit, grasping the authority of reward and punishment, and exercising kindness and awe, one is feared and revered by the world as a spirit or god and honored as the High God—this may be called exceedingly honorable. But the sage does not allow honor to become a burden to himself, and so can long preserve honor without losing it. It is like a person who can forget his limbs, cast aside cleverness, reject bodily form and cunning, and merge with the Great Dao: wherever he may be, he finds joy in himself. Worldly people exchange external things for their original nature; therefore they are burdened by things and cannot let go of power. They let bodily form burden the mind and spirit; therefore they lose the original heart and cannot let go of the body. This calamity is truly great.

The sub-commentary further explains: To set oneself up as honorable will in the end inevitably include times of loss; only by not taking honor as one’s own can one truly preserve honor. This is the same principle that applies to ordinary people.

疏义曰:以贵自居,未免有息,惟不自有其贵,则可以守贵矣。犹人也。世之人以物易性,故累物而不能忘势,以形累心,故丧心而不能忘形,其患大矣。 疏义曰:以贵自居,未免有息,惟不自有其贵,则可以守贵矣。犹人之一身,认为己有则动辄有碍,知身非我有,则可以保身矣。今夫利势之重得以据之,赏罚之权得以檀之,威福之柄得以专之,天下畏之如神明,尊之如上帝,其贵可谓无敌矣。惟圣人执虚驭满,不以贵自居,则虽贵而无息。如人之有身,寓百骸以堕肢体,象耳目以黜聪明,离形而不拘於形,去智而不凿以智,则同於大通,造乎不形。惟圣人执虚驭满,不以贵自居,则虽贵而无息。如人之有身,寓百骸以堕肢体,象耳目以黜聪明,离形而不拘於形,去智而不凿以智,则同於大通,造乎不形,无入而不自得也,夫孰以身为息哉?妄庸之人不能尽性而志势,累於物以易其性;不能尽心而忘形,累於形以丧其心。以物易性,以形累心,其患大矣。 吾所以有大患者,为吾有身。及吾无身,吾有何患?
Interpretation

The meaning of this passage in the Daode Zhenjing Shuyi (Sub-commentary on the Meaning of the True Scripture of the Dao [the Way] and De [Virtue/Power]) is this: if a person takes nobility as his own station, he will inevitably suffer some loss; only by not regarding nobility as something he possesses can he preserve it for long. This is like the human body: if one obstinately regards the body as “mine,” every action is obstructed; only by understanding that the body does not truly belong to oneself can one preserve it.

Now those who grasp great power and authority, wield the great powers of reward and punishment, and monopolize the levers of awe and favor—the people of the world fear them like gods and revere them like supreme deities; their nobility may be called unmatched. Yet the sage uses emptiness to master fullness and does not take nobility as his own station; therefore, though noble, he can endure without decline.

This is like a person possessing a body: let all the bones of the body (baihai) settle each in its proper place, forget the functions of the four limbs, withdraw the cleverness of ear and eye, transcend bodily form without being bound by it, and discard cunning and intellectual calculation without forcing strained interpretations. In this way one accords with “Great Penetration” (Datong, the state of unobstructed communion with the Dao) and attains “No-form” (Buxing, the state beyond formed things). Wherever one goes, one finds joy in oneself; how could one ever suffer loss because of the body?

But ordinary people cannot fully preserve their original nature, yet single-mindedly pursue power and are entangled by external things until their nature is altered; they cannot concentrate on guarding the inner spirit, yet cannot forget the bodily form, and are burdened by the body until they lose their mind-spirit. To alter one’s nature through external things and burden one’s mind-spirit through the bodily form—the calamity is great.

Laozi’s statement, “Why do I have great trouble? Because I have a body. When I no longer have a body, what trouble do I have?” means precisely this: clinging to bodily form and external things invites calamity; transcending bodily form and external things leaves no trouble.

徽宗注曰:人之生也,百骸九窍六脏赅而存焉,吾谁能为亲?认而有之,皆惑也。体道者解乎此,故孔子曰:朝闻道,夕死可矣。孟子曰:夭寿不二。颜子曰:回坐忘矣。夫死生亦大矣,而无变于己,况得丧祸福之所介乎?此古之至人所以不以利累形,不以形累心。视万物与我将择焉而不可得,则吾身非吾有夫死生亦大矣,而无变于己,况得丧祸福之所介乎?此古之至人所以不以利累形,不以形累心。视万物与我将择焉而不可得,则吾身非吾有也。上与造物者游,下与外死生无终始者为友,吾有何息?且宠者世所荣也,而以为辱,贵者人所乐也,而以为息,盖外物之不可恃也,理固然矣。诚能有之以无有j则虽宠而不辱,虽贵而无息。伊尹之不以宠利居成功,尧之不以位为乐,几是已。
Interpretation

In a person’s lifetime, the hundred bones, nine apertures, and six viscera all exist complete within the body; who, then, can be said truly to belong to “me”? If one insists that they are mine and are what I cling to, that is delusion. Those who understand the great Dao (the Way) are precisely concerned with untangling this delusion; hence Confucius said, “If one hears the Dao in the morning, one may die content in the evening.” Mencius said, “One does not change one’s resolve because of length or shortness of life.” Yan Hui said, “I have reached sitting in forgetfulness.”

Life and death are the greatest matters in human life, and even they cannot make one change oneself; how much less can gain and loss, misfortune and blessing disturb him? This is why the perfected people of ancient times did not let the advantages and harms of external things burden their bodies, nor let the demands of the body burden their minds. They viewed the relation between the ten thousand things and themselves in such a way that even if they wished to distinguish self from other, they had no way to do so; thus this body was no longer something they could monopolize. Above, they wandered with the Creator; below, they made friends with those who transcend life and death and have no distinction of beginning and end—what else could make them cease their pursuit?

Moreover, favor is a glory valued by the world, but they regard it as disgrace; wealth and honor are what people delight in, but they regard them as burdens. This is probably because external things cannot be relied upon; the principle is simply so. If one can truly attain this state of “having yet as if not having,” then even when favored one will not feel disgrace, and even when wealthy and honored one will not be trapped by it. Yi Yin did not pride himself on favor and utility, and Tang Yao did not gloat over power and position—this is probably that very state.

Notes: Huizong refers to Emperor Huizong of Song, personal name Zhao Ji, who personally annotated the Daodejing; the Daode Zhenjing Shuyi (Subcommentary and Exposition on the True Scripture of the Dao and De) is part of his commentary system. Confucius, Mencius, and Yanzi refer respectively to Kong Qiu, Meng Ke, and Yan Hui; the quotations here come from Confucian classics and are used to corroborate Daoist views. Zhiren (the perfected person) is an ideal personality in Daoism, referring to one whose cultivation has reached an extremely high level and who transcends worldly gain and loss. The Creator refers to the Dao that generates the ten thousand things, or to heaven, earth, and nature.

疏义曰:形骸之内有真君,足以高天下;有真宰,足以制万物。形骸之外,百骸九窍六脏赅而存焉,吾谁与为亲?苟不知索於形体之内,方且本身而异形,认而有之,皆感也。惟体道者知形形之不形,虽其形化,而吾有不忘者存。故朝闻道,夕死可矣。孟子曰:夭寿不二。齐寿夭也。颜子曰:回坐忘矣知形形之不形,虽其形化,而吾有不忘者存。故朝闻道,夕死可矣。孟子曰:夭寿不二。齐寿夭也。颜子曰:回坐忘矣。忘物我也。夫死生亦大矣,而无变于己,况得丧祸福之所介乎?此无他,知形骸之内有真君真宰者存,故总括百骸者,不能为之患也。古之至人不以利累形,异乎见得而忘形;不以形累心,至於废心而用形。内观其心,心无其心,外观其形,形无其形,远观其物,物无其物,视万物与我将择焉而不得,则吾身非吾有也。见不见之形,上与造物者游,下与外死生无终始者为友,夫孰足以息?心已其物,视万物与我将择焉而不得,则吾身非吾有也。见不见之形,上与造物者游,下与外死生无终始者为友,夫孰足以息?心已是则虽宠而不辱,虽贵而无息,岂以世之所荣而为辱,人之所乐而为息哉?伊尹不以宠利居成功而得持宠之术,尧不以位为乐而得守贵之道,几是已。
Interpretation

Within the physical frame there is the True Lord (zhenjun), sufficient to command all under Heaven; there is the True Sovereign (zhenzai), sufficient to govern the ten thousand things. As for the outer frame of the body—the hundred bones (all the joints), the nine openings (the seven openings plus the two lower orifices), and the six viscera (the internal organs)—all rely on the physical form. With whom, then, can I be intimate? If one does not know to seek the True Lord and True Sovereign within the physical frame, one will treat the body as something other than oneself and stubbornly believe that it belongs to oneself; all this is a sign of being stirred and entangled by external things. Only one who realizes the great Dao understands that although the physical form has shape, it is not the true substantial reality. Even if the physical form changes, the inner True Lord still remains and is not lost. Hence it is said, “If one hears the Dao in the morning, one may die that evening and it is enough.” Mencius said, “Not to be of two minds about early death and long life”: this means that whether one’s lifespan is long or short, the mind and will do not change, and long life and early death are regarded as the same. Yan Hui said, “I have sat in forgetfulness”: this means forgetting the distinction between things and myself.

Death and life are great matters, but if one can refrain from changing oneself because of them, how much less can small matters such as gain and loss, misfortune and blessing, trouble him? There is no other reason for this: it is simply because he knows that within the physical frame the True Lord and True Sovereign exist, and therefore he can command the hundred bones, and external things cannot become a calamity to him.

The Perfected (zhiren) of ancient times did not let profit burden the physical form, and so they could see through gain and loss and forget the body; they did not let the physical form burden the mind and spirit, so that the mind no longer clung, and they used the body merely as a tool. Looking inward at one’s own mind, the mind had no mind (no clinging mind); looking outward at one’s own physical form, the form was also as if without form; looking far out at the ten thousand things, the ten thousand things were also as if empty. In viewing the ten thousand things and the self, one could not even distinguish between choosing and rejecting; then this body was no longer something privately owned by me. One who can see the form that is not seen, above associates with the Creator and below befriends those who transcend death and life and have no beginning or end—what could still disturb him? If the mind has already transcended things, then even when favored he will not feel bent or disgraced by it, and even when honored he will not be burdened by it. How could he regard the glory esteemed by the world as humiliation, or the joy loved by people as rest?

Yi Yin did not place favor and profit above success, and so he could grasp the way of not being lost through favor; Yao did not regard the imperial throne as joy, and so he could preserve the principle of holding honor without losing it. This is probably what is meant.

故贵以身为天下,若可寄天下;爱以身为天下,若可托天下。 徽宗注曰:天下大器也,非道莫运;天下神器也,非道莫守。圣人体道,故在宥天下,天下乐推而不厌。其次则知贵其身而不自贱以役於物者,若可寄而已;知爱其身而不自贼以困於物者,若可托而已。故曰道之真以则知贵其身而不自贱以役於物者,若可寄而已;知爱其身而不自贼以困於物者,若可托而已。故曰道之真以治身,绪余以为国家,土直以治天下。世俗之君子,乃危身弃生以殉物,岂不悲夫?
Interpretation

Thus, one who can regard his own person as more precious than the world can have the world placed in his keeping; one who can cherish his own person more dearly than the world can have the world entrusted to him.

Emperor Huizong’s commentary explains: The world is a great vessel; without the Dao (the Way; the fundamental principle by which the universe operates), it cannot function. The world is also a sacred vessel; without the Dao, it cannot be guarded. The sage comprehends the Dao, and therefore can govern the world with magnanimity (zaiyou, that is, governance that is tolerant and does not disturb the people); the people of the world gladly raise him up and never grow weary of him. Those of the next level understand how to prize their own persons and do not let themselves be enslaved by external things, and so certain affairs can be entrusted to them; they understand how to cherish their own persons and do not allow external things to injure them or plunge them into difficulty, and so certain responsibilities can be entrusted to them.

Therefore it is said: the essence of the Dao is used to cultivate the self; its surplus is used to govern the state; its coarse remnants are used to govern the world (tuzhi, that is, crude dregs, a metaphor for secondary matters). Yet the worldly gentlemen harm their own persons and cast away their lives, sacrificing themselves for external things—is this not lamentable?

疏义曰:六合内外,无尽无极,则天下大器也。必有出乎器者,然后能运之,出乎器者,道也。立乎不测,行乎无方,则天下神器也。必有与於神者,然后能守之,与於神者,道也。圣人体是以在己,故在天下而不淫其性,宥天下而不迁其德,自西自东,自南自北,无思不服,天下乐推而不厌矣。其次则有明乎圣人体是以在己,故在天下而不淫其性,宥天下而不迁其德,自西自东,自南自北,无思不服,天下乐推而不厌矣。其次则有明乎物物之非物,而无以天下为者,知一节重於一国,两臂重於天下,身亦重於两臂,贵其身而不自贼,爱其身而不自贱,若可寄托而已。夫岂残生伤性,以身为殉,樊然殽乱为物所役,薾然疲役为物所困,不知保身之道欤?庄子所谓道之真以治身,绪余以为国家,土直以治天下,正谓是也。世俗之君子不知身为生之主,乃杀身以成名,多方以?庄子所谓道之真以治身,绪余以为国家,土直以治天下,正谓是也。世俗之君子不知身为生之主,乃杀身以成名,多方以丧生,逐物而不返,危身弃生以徇物,是犹以隋侯之珠弹千仞之雀,所丧多矣,岂不悲夫。 视之不见章第十四 视之不见名曰夷, 徽宗注曰:目主视,视以辩物,夷则平而无辩,非视所及,故名曰夷。太易未见,气是已。
Interpretation

This passage from the Subcommentary and Explication on the Daode Zhenjing mainly discusses the relationship between Dao and vessel, as well as the different attitudes of the sage and worldly people toward the body, fame, and profit.

Subcommentary Section (Vernacular Interpretation)

Heaven, earth, the four directions, above and below—vast, boundless, and without limit—this is the greatest “vessel” under Heaven (referring to the tangible carrier of the myriad things). Whenever there is a tangible vessel, there must be something beyond the vessel that operates it; that which transcends the vessel is Dao. To stand in a realm that cannot be measured and to move in a state without fixed abode—this is the most mysterious “vessel” under Heaven (referring to the intangible and mysterious). Whenever there is something mysterious, there must be something that communicates with the spirit and guards it; that which communicates with the spirit is also Dao.

The sage realizes Dao and therefore causes Dao to reside within himself. Thus, though he dwells in the world, he does not indulge his nature; though he embraces the world with tolerance, he does not alter his De. From west to east and from south to north, there is no one who is not won over in heart and sincerely convinced; all people under Heaven delight in raising him up without growing weary of him.

Those of the next order understand that the essential nature of the myriad things does not lie in external objects, and therefore they do not contend for the world. They know that a single joint of a finger is more important than a state, that both arms are more important than the world, and that their own person is more important still than both arms. Therefore they treasure their bodies and do not harm themselves; they cherish their bodies and do not debase themselves; they regard the world as merely something temporarily entrusted to them.

How could this be a matter of harming life, injuring nature, making the body a burial offering to external things, being driven by external things amid confusion and turmoil, being trapped by external things until utterly exhausted, and failing to understand the principle of preserving oneself? Zhuangzi’s statement that “the essence of Dao is used to cultivate the self, its remainder to govern the state, and its dregs to govern the world” refers precisely to this.

Worldly gentlemen do not understand that the body is the root of life. They go so far as to sacrifice the body for empty fame, scheme in every way until they lose their lives, chase external things without knowing how to return, and endanger themselves and cast away life in pursuit of external things. This is like using the pearl of the Marquis of Sui (a precious treasure) to shoot at a bird a thousand ren high: the loss is truly too great. Is this not lamentable?

Vernacular Interpretation of the Scriptural Passage “Viewed but Not Seen, It Is Named Yi”

“Viewed but not seen”: looking with the eyes, one does not see it. “It is named Yi”: it is called Yi. The commentary explains: the function of the eye is sight, and sight is for distinguishing things; but yi is level and undifferentiated, a state without discrimination, beyond the range that vision can reach—therefore it is called yi. The commentary further notes that when Taiyi (the Great Change; the primordial state before the cosmos had manifested any sign) had not yet revealed any trace, it was precisely this state of Qi (vital energy).

疏义曰:天三生木,在人为肝,肝开窍於目,故於五事为视,则目主视故也。明两作离#2,寓象於目,而目之於色,合而后有见,则视以辫物故也。然视而可见,未离乎色,或高或下,可得而辩也。妙道非,寓象於目,而目之於色,合而后有见,则视以辫物故也。然视而可见,未离乎色,或高或下,可得而辩也。妙道非色,青然空然,曾无兆朕,视之不足见也。其平坦然,孰辩高下?列子所谓太易未见,气是已。浑沦之初,气且未见,其平可知,故名曰夷。 听之不闻名曰希, 徽宗注曰:耳主听,听以察物,希则穊而有间,非听所闻,故名曰希。大音希声是已。 疏义曰:天一生水,在藏为肾,肾开窍於耳,故於五事为听,则耳主听也。水荐至为坎,寓象於耳,而耳之於声,辫而后能听,则听以察物故也。然听而可闻,未离乎声,迭为清浊,莫之能主听也。水荐至为坎,寓象於耳,而耳之於声,辫而后能听,则听以察物故也。然听而可闻,未离乎声,迭为清浊,莫之能间。妙道无声,寂兮寥兮,曾无音响,听之不足闻也。风济籁息,概而有间,经所谓大音希声是已。动於无方,居於窈冥,其穊可知,故名曰希。 搏之不得名曰微。 徽宗注曰:微乎微乎,至於无形,孰得而搏之?大象无形是已。
Interpretation

The Shuyi (Subcommentary) says: Among the heavenly numbers, three belongs to Wood and gives birth to Wood; in the human body it corresponds to the liver. The liver opens into the eyes, and so among the Five Affairs—the five human functions of seeing, hearing, speaking, acting, and thinking—it belongs to seeing, and the eyes govern sight. The image of Li (one of the Bagua, representing brightness) is reflected in the eye; only when the eye comes into contact with the colors of external things does seeing arise, and thus sight is able to distinguish things. Yet what can be seen still belongs to the realm of formed color; being high or low, it can be distinguished.

The wondrous Dao is not a thing that has color. It is clear and empty, wholly without trace; when looked at with the eye, it is not seen. It is flat and uniform—where could high and low be distinguished? What the Liezi calls Taiyi (the Great Change) is the state in which no trace has yet manifested, that is, the state before primordial Qi has appeared. At the first opening of Chaos, Qi was still invisible; its tranquil state can readily be imagined. Therefore it is called Yi (level).

On the line “Listening to it, one does not hear it; this is called Xi,” Emperor Huizong of Song comments: The ear governs hearing, and hearing is what is used to perceive things. Xi means sparse and separated by intervals; it is not something the ear can hear, and so it is called Xi. This is the meaning of “the Great Sound is inaudible.”

The Shuyi says: Among the heavenly numbers, one belongs to Water and gives birth to Water; in the human body it corresponds to the kidneys. The kidneys open into the ears, and so among the Five Affairs it belongs to hearing, and the ears govern hearing. The image of Kan (one of the Bagua, representing Water) is reflected in the ear; when the ear comes into contact with sound, hearing occurs only after discrimination, and hearing is used to perceive things. Yet sounds that can be heard still belong to things that have sound; sometimes clear, sometimes turbid, they cannot govern hearing. The wondrous Dao is without sound, utterly still and silent, with no acoustic trace; when heard by the ear, it is not heard. When the wind stops, sound ceases; sounds become sparse and intermittent. This is precisely the meaning of the scriptural text’s “the Great Sound is inaudible.” The wondrous Dao moves without fixed direction and dwells in a profound and hidden place; its sparseness can readily be imagined, and so it is called Xi.

On the line “Grasping at it, one does not obtain it; this is called Wei,” Emperor Huizong comments: How subtle! How subtle! So subtle that it has no form—who can grasp it? This is the meaning of “the Great Image has no form.”

疏义曰:气变而后有形,有形而后可得。至道之精,窈窈冥冥,未始有物,循之而不得也,是谓微乎微乎,至於无形者矣。有形斯可搏,道之无形,孰得而搏之?经所谓大象无形,则象之大者,孰有过於道者哉?夫惟无形,故其大无外也。 此三者不可致诂,故混而为一。 徽宗注曰:太易未判,孰分高下?大音希声,孰辫清浊?大象无形,孰为巨细?目无所用其明,耳无所施其聪,形无所竭其者不可致诂,故混而为一。 徽宗注曰:太易未判,孰分高下?大音希声,孰辫清浊?大象无形,孰为巨细?目无所用其明,耳无所施其聪,形无所竭其力,道之全体於是乎在。穷之不可究,探之不可得也。气形质具而未相离,故混而为一。虽然,既已为一矣,且得无言乎?
Interpretation

Qi first undergoes change, and only then does form arise; only when there is form can it be known and grasped. The subtle essence of the supreme Dao is profound and remote, dark and indistinct; it has not yet begun to become any concrete thing. Follow it in search, and it still cannot be found—hence the saying, “So subtle, so subtle, until it becomes formless.”

Only things with form can be touched. The Dao has no form—who can touch it? Laozi says, “The Great Image has no form.” If so, as for greatness of image, who could surpass the Dao? Precisely because the Dao is formless, its “greatness” has no boundary and no periphery.

Qi, form, and substance—these three cannot be defined one by one in words, and so they are blended into one body.

Song Huizong’s commentary says: Taiyi (the primordial state described in the Liezi, when the myriad things had not yet appeared and all was still undivided) has not yet differentiated—who can distinguish high from low? The Great Sound (the grandest sound) is soundless—who can distinguish the clear from the turbid? The Great Image has no shape—who can distinguish large from small? The eyes have nowhere to exercise their keen perception, the ears have nowhere to exercise their hearing, and the body has nowhere to exert its strength. The totality of the Dao is just here: exhaust it and it cannot be fathomed; seek it and it cannot be obtained. Qi, form, and substance are all present but have not yet separated, and so they are blended into one. Even so, since it is already one body, how could there be no words about it?

疏义曰:太易未判,列子所谓色色者未尝呈是也。色色者无色,孰分高下?大音希声,列子所谓声声者未尝发是也。声声者无声,孰辫清浊?大象无形,列子所谓形形者未尝显是也。形形者无形,孰为巨细?虽使离朱当昼拭訾望之而不见其形,则目无所用其明也。虽使师旷终夜俛首倾耳而听之不闻其声,则耳无所施其聪也。虽使知与吃诟之徒索之而终莫得,则形无所竭其力也。自其视之不见,言之则曰夷。自其听之不闻,言之则曰希。自其搏之不得,言之则曰微。三所施其聪也。虽使知与吃诟之徒索之而终莫得,则形无所竭其力也。自其视之不见,言之则曰夷。自其听之不闻,言之则曰希。自其搏之不得,言之则曰微。三者异名同实,其指一也,道之全体於是乎在。穷之不可究,探之不可得,列子所谓浑沦是也。谓之浑沦,则以气形质具混为一,而未相离故也。既已为一矣,且得无言乎? 其上不皦,其下不昧。 徽宗注曰:形而上者,阴阳不测,幽而难无,兹谓至神,故不皦。皦言明也。形而下者,一阴一阳,辫而有数,兹谓至道,故不昧。昧言幽也。《易》曰:神而明之,存乎其人。
Interpretation

When Taiyi (the Great Change) had not yet differentiated, as the Liezi says: “That which gives color to things—the source of things with form—has never itself displayed color.” The source of colored things is itself colorless; how, then, could high and low be distinguished? The greatest sound is soundless; as the Liezi says, “That which gives sound to sounds has never itself emitted sound.” The source of sound is itself soundless; how, then, could clear and muddy tones be distinguished? The greatest image is formless; as the Liezi says, “That which gives form to forms has never itself shown form.” The source of bodily form is itself formless; how, then, could great and small be judged?

Even if Li Zhu—the legendary figure of keenest eyesight—were to polish his eyes in broad daylight and look closely, he could not see its form, and his eyes would have no place to exercise their keen sight; even if Shi Kuang—the famous musician of Jin in the Spring and Autumn period, with exceptionally acute hearing—were to bow his head and listen all night, he could not hear its sound, and his ears would have no place to exercise their acute hearing; even if the wise and those skilled in inquiry were to search repeatedly, in the end they would gain nothing, and their bodies would have no way to exert force.

From the standpoint of “not seeing,” it is called Yi (level and without image); from the standpoint of “not hearing,” it is called Xi (silent and without sound); from the standpoint of “not touching,” it is called Wei (subtle and hard to manifest). The three names differ, but the entity indicated is the same, and the purport is one; the entire substance of the Great Dao lies therein. If one probes it deeply, it cannot be exhausted; if one seeks it, it cannot be obtained—this is what the Liezi calls Hundun (the undifferentiated whole). It is called Hundun because Qi, form, and substance are blended into one and have not yet separated. Since it is already an undifferentiated whole, can it still be described in words?

“Above, it is not bright; below, it is not dark”: on the metaphysical level, the transformations of Yin-Yang are unfathomably deep, distant and hard to illuminate, and so it is said to be “not bright” (bujiao, not clear); on the phenomenal level, one Yin and one Yang have differentiated into order and measure, and so it is said to be “not dark” (bumei, not obscure). Emperor Huizong’s commentary says that jiao means bright and mei means dark. The Yijing says: “To make it bright through spiritual power depends on the person.”

疏义曰:形而上者谓之道,而神实妙焉,则神固形而上矣。阴知神之在阴,而不知其亦在阳,阳知神之在阳,而不知其亦在阴,神则阴阳不测也。速不疾而行不至,惛然若亡而存,是之谓其上不皦。形而下者谓.之器,而道实寓焉,则道亦阳不测也。速不疾而行不至,惛然若亡而存,是之谓其上不皦。形而下者谓.之器,而道实寓焉,则道亦形而下矣。不偏于阳,非独阳而生,不毗于阴,非独阴而成,道则一阴一阳也。可以约,可以散,在无亦显,是之谓其下不昧。盖皦与皦如之皦同,皦言明也,不皦则幽而难知矣。昧与昧谷之昧同,昧言幽也,不昧则辫而有数矣。虽然,苟非其人,道不虚行,则神而明之,存乎其人故也。 绳绳兮不可名,复归於无物。 徽宗注曰:道之体,若昼夜之有经,而莫测其幽明之故,岂貌像声色可得而形容乎?故复归於无物。 疏义曰:绳以约物,使不失其直,绳绳则不出乎防范检押之内也。道之伦经,有条而不紊,若昼夜之有经,一晦一明无或渝也,故谓复归於无物。
Interpretation

The subcommentary holds that what belongs to the realm of the formless is called Dao (the Way). The mystery of Shen (spirit) also lies within it, and so Shen itself likewise belongs to the formless realm. People within Yin know only that Shen is in Yin, but not that it is also in Yang; people within Yang know only that Shen is in Yang, but not that it is also in Yin. Shen transcends the range that Yin and Yang can fathom. It moves swiftly yet does not seem hurried; it seems already to have arrived, and yet seems not to have arrived; indistinct, as if present and as if absent—this is what is meant by saying that in high places it is not bright.

What belongs to the realm of the formed is called the “vessel,” and Dao actually lodges within it; therefore Dao also belongs to the realm of the formed. Dao does not incline toward Yang, nor does it arise solely by means of Yang; it does not attach itself to Yin, nor is it completed solely by means of Yin—it is the unity of Yin and Yang. Dao can be contracted and can be diffused; though it dwells in the formless, its effects are also plainly evident—this is what is meant by saying that in low places it is not dark. “Jiao” is the same as the word jiao meaning “bright”; if it were not bright, it would be hidden and difficult to know. “Mei” is the same as the “mei” in “Meigu,” meaning dark; if it were not dark, it would be distinct and orderly. Even so, if it is not the right person, Dao will not circulate in vain. What can make the wondrous manifest lies in the person themselves.

“Sheng sheng! It cannot be named; it returns again to nothingness.”

Huizong’s commentary says: The substance of Dao is like the course of day and night, which has a constant regularity to follow, yet the cause of its changes between light and dark cannot be inferred. How could it be described by form, sound, or color? Therefore it says, “It returns again to nothingness.” (“Huizong” refers to Zhao Ji, Emperor Huizong of the Song; this commentary is his annotation to the Daodejing.)

The subcommentary says: “Sheng” is the marking cord used to constrain things and keep them from deviating from what is straight. “Sheng sheng” means not going beyond the bounds of rule and measure. Dao’s order is well arranged and not chaotic, like the fixed regularity of day and night, in which dark and light never change; therefore it says it “returns again to nothingness.”

疏义曰:绳以约物,使不失其直,绳绳则不出乎防范检押之内也。道之伦经,有条而不紊,若昼夜之有经,一晦一明无或渝也,故谓之绳绳。然深妙眇冥,无有无名,莫测其幽明之故,是以不可名。若然则复本归根,一毫不留,非特未始有物,而又至於未始有夫未始有物者矣,岂貌像声色可得而形容乎?是之谓复归於无物。 是谓无状之状,无物之象,是谓恍惚。 徽宗注曰:无状之状,无物之象,恍兮惚,其中有物,惚兮恍,其中有象。犹如太虚含蓄万象,而不诸其端倪。犹如一性灵智自若,而莫究其运用。谓之有而非有,谓之无而非无,若日月之去人远矣,以鉴燧求焉,而水火自至。水火果何在哉?无状之状,无物之象,亦犹是也。 疏义曰:有状故可见,道无见也,亦不离见,故为无状之状。有形故可象,道无形也,亦不离形,故为无物之象。也。
Interpretation

The subcommentary states: A rope is used to bind objects and keep them from deviating from the straight. “Shengsheng” means that the movement of the Dao does not exceed the bounds of regulation and constraint. The laws of the Dao are orderly and not chaotic, just as the alternation of day and night is constant—one bright, one dark, never changing—and so it is called “shengsheng.” Yet the Dao is profound, subtle, and hidden, without form or name; no one can fathom the causes of its alternations of light and dark. Therefore it is said to be “unnameable.” If one can return to the root and not leave even a hair’s breadth behind, then it is not merely “there had never yet been things” (nothing had yet existed), but even “there had never yet been that state of there never having been things” (even the state of “not yet having things” had never existed). What realm is this, that form, sound, and color could depict it? This is what is called “returning to no-thing.”

“This is called the shape of no-shape, the image of no-thing; this is called the indistinct and elusive”: The Dao is the shape of no-shape and the image of no-thing; this is called “elusive,” that is, as if present and as if absent, difficult to grasp.

The commentary of Song Huizong (an emperor of the Northern Song, referred to in the commentary as “Huizong”) says: The shape of no-shape and the image of no-thing—within the elusive and indistinct there is something; within the indistinct and elusive there is an image. This is like the Great Void (Taixu), the vast boundless emptiness, containing the ten thousand images, yet no one sees its beginning or end; or like a numinous, luminous wisdom that dwells freely and peacefully, yet no one can exhaust its workings. To say it “exists” is not to say it is substantially real; to say it “does not exist” is not to say it is absolutely nothing. It is like the sun and moon far away in the heavens: people must use a yangsui (ancient concave bronze mirror for kindling fire) to obtain fire, and the fire comes of itself. Where, after all, are water and fire? So too is “the shape of no-shape, the image of no-thing.”

The subcommentary also says: Only what has shape can be seen. The Dao fundamentally has no visible shape, yet it does not depart from visible things; therefore it is called “the shape of no-shape.” Only what has bodily form can be depicted. The Dao fundamentally has no form, yet it does not depart from bodily form; therefore it is called “the image of no-thing.”

疏义曰:有状故可见,道无见也,亦不离见,故为无状之状。有形故可象,道无形也,亦不离形,故为无物之象。无状之状,无物之象,意其有而非有,恍兮惚而中有物也,意其无而非无,惚兮恍而中有象也,如太虚一虚化出万有而未始有封,含蓄万象不睹其端倪也。如一性无性,应物不穷而深不可测,灵智自若而莫究其妙用也。即有而无,有实非有,即无而有,无实非无。若日月去人远矣,以方诸取水於月,以阳燧取火於日,不旋顷而水火自至。水火之为物,不可以有无期之也,无状之状,无物之象若日月去人远矣,以方诸取水於月,以阳燧取火於日,不旋顷而水火自至。水火之为物,不可以有无期之也,无状之状,无物之象,亦犹是也,故谓之恍惚。 迎之不见其首,随之不见其后。 徽宗注曰:其始无首,其卒无尾,故迎之随之,有不得而见焉。 疏义曰:道之全体,混成完具,赡之在前,孰原其所始?忽焉在后,孰要其所终?庄子所谓其始无首,其卒无尾是也。迎之随之,曾何有见哉? 执古之道,以御今之有。能知古始,是谓道纪。
Interpretation

The sub-commentary says: The Dao has a “shape,” and therefore it can be seen; yet the Dao fundamentally has no visible shape, and yet it cannot be separated from “seeing,” so it is called the “shape of no-shape”—without shape, yet in some manner presenting itself. The Dao has a “form,” and therefore it can be compared and depicted; yet the Dao fundamentally has no bodily form, and yet it cannot be separated from “form,” so it is called the “image of no-thing”—without any substantial thing, yet having its image.

“The shape of no-shape” and “the image of no-thing” seem to be being, yet they are not truly being; in the indistinct and elusive, there seems to be something. They seem to be non-being, yet they are not absolute non-being; in the elusive and indistinct, there seems to be an image. This is like Taixu (the vast, boundless void), empty and vast, yet giving rise to the myriad beings, while the myriad beings have no clear boundaries; it contains the myriad images, yet no beginning or thread can be seen. It is also like “one nature without fixed nature”: its fundamental nature is unified and cannot be fixed as any particular nature; it accords with the myriad things and is inexhaustible, profound and unfathomable; its spiritual clarity and wisdom are spontaneous, yet the wonder of its function cannot be fully investigated.

Therefore, it is both being and non-being: the substance of being is not truly being; it is both non-being and being: the substance of non-being is not truly non-being. It is like the sun and moon, which are far from people, yet one can use fangzhu (an ancient bronze water-collecting vessel; facing the moon, it obtains water) to gather water from the moon, and use yangsui (an ancient concave bronze mirror for making fire; facing the sun, it obtains fire), and before long water and fire come of themselves. Things such as water and fire cannot be defined by “being” or “non-being.” The “shape of no-shape” and “image of no-thing” are also like this, and so they are called “huanghu” (elusive).

“Meet it and you do not see its head; follow it and you do not see its back.”

Emperor Huizong’s commentary says: The Dao has no beginning at the outset and no end at the finish; therefore, whether you go to meet it or follow it, you cannot see it.

The sub-commentary says: The entirety of the Dao is naturally complete and perfectly sufficient. Look straight at it, and it is right before you—who can trace where it begins? Suddenly it is behind you—who can grasp its endpoint? As Zhuangzi says, “Its beginning has no head, its end has no tail.” Meeting it or following it, how could one truly see it?

“Hold fast to the Dao of antiquity in order to master the beings of today. To know the ancient beginning—this is called the Dao’s order.”

Holding fast to the Dao of antiquity in order to master the myriad beings of today; to be able to know the ancient beginning of the myriad things—this is called the Dao’s order (daoji, the general principle that governs the myriad things).

徽宗注曰:一阴一阳之子所谓其始无首,其卒无尾是也。迎之随之,曾何有见哉? 执古之道,以御今之有。能知古始,是谓道纪。 徽宗注曰:一阴一阳之谓道。师天而无地者,或蔽于道之动而凭其强阳;师阴而无阳者,或溺于道之静而止於桔槁。为我者废七,为人者废义,岂古之道哉?古之道不可致诂而非有,是谓恍惚而非无。执之以御世,则变通以尽利,鼓舞以尽神,而无不可者,道之大常无易于此,所谓自古以固存者欤?故曰能知古始,是谓道纪。
Interpretation

Huizong’s Commentary: The Dao is the mutual operation of one Yin and one Yang. Those who follow only the Yang of Heaven and ignore the Yin of Earth are easily obscured by the dynamic aspect of the Dao and act solely on the basis of strong Yang Qi; those who follow only Yin and disregard Yang sink into stillness and in the end wither like dead wood. Those concerned only with themselves discard the seven emotions (generally referring to joy, anger, sorrow, fear, and so on), while those concerned only with others discard benevolence and righteousness. How could this be the Dao spoken of by the ancients? The Dao of antiquity cannot be fully clarified in words, yet it is not nothing at all; it seems to exist and yet not exist, indistinct and difficult to discern. Grasping this Dao to govern the world, one can accord with transformation and gain benefit, rouse the wondrous functions of things, and there is nothing that cannot be done. The fundamental constancy of the Dao is precisely this meaning; what is meant by “from ancient times to the present it has always existed” is probably this. Therefore, to know the beginning of the myriad things is called “Daoji” (the general guiding principle of the Dao).

Subcommentary: When the Heavenly Dao is established, it is spoken of as Yin and Yang. Although the Dao itself is not the same as Yin and Yang, it nevertheless cannot be separated from Yin and Yang. The constancy and unchanging nature of the Dao lie precisely in this, which is the meaning of the saying “from ancient times to the present it has always existed.” Therefore, to know the beginning of the myriad things is called “Daoji.”

疏义曰:立天之道曰阴与阳,则道虽非阴阳,亦不离者,道之大常无易于此,所谓自古以固存者欤?故曰能知古始,是谓道纪。 疏义曰:立天之道曰阴与阳,则道虽非阴阳,亦不离阴阳故也。昧於道者分阴分阳,或悦生而累形,则蔽于道之动而凭其强阳;或趋寂以忘身,则溺於道之静而止乎桔槁。为墨氏之兼爱者,为人而废义,至於无见於畸。为杨氏之为我者,为我而废仁,至於荡而不法不该不偏,蔽於一曲。岂古之道哉?古之道有不废无,不可致诂而非有,无不外有,是谓恍惚而非无。操此为验,稽此为次,以应万变,以对方来,变通足以尽利,鼓舞足以尽神,其於御世,无不可者,此古之道也。是道也,长於上古而不为老,未有天地,自古以固存。维纲尽神,其於御世,无不可者,此古之道也。是道也,长於上古而不为老,未有天地,自古以固存。维纲宰制,凡囿於物,未有外是而能立者,道之大常无易于此。惟能探物之先而知其始,则道之伦经皆在我矣,故曰是谓道纪。 道德真经疏义卷之三竟 #1则与化为:『为』后疑脱『一』。 #2明两作离:『离』前疑脱『为』。 6-道德真经疏义卷之四 道德真经疏义卷之四 太学生江澄疏 古之善为士章第十五 古之善为士者,微妙玄通,深不可识。
Interpretation

Subcommentary Explanation: What establishes the Dao of Heaven and Earth is called Yin-Yang. The Dao itself is not Yin-Yang, yet it does not depart from Yin-Yang. Those who do not understand the Dao view Yin-Yang as split apart. Some crave survival and are burdened by bodily form; seeing only the movement of the Dao, they rely on strong Yang. Others incline solely toward stillness and forget the body; indulging in the stillness of the Dao, they remain in withered dryness.

The Mohists (Mo Di) advocated universal love and, for others’ sake, set aside the Dao and rightness, to the point of not seeing their own limitations. Yang Zhu (Master Yang) advocated “for oneself” and, for his own sake, discarded benevolence, to the point of becoming unrestrained without measure and not observing norms—neither complete nor impartial, clinging only to a one-cornered view. Could this be the Dao of the ancients?

The Dao of the ancients did not discard “Nonbeing,” nor did it fix it as a speakable “Being.” “Nonbeing” is also not detached outside “Being”; this state is called “huanghu” (indistinct and elusive), and it is not nothingness. Taking this as the standard of verification and as the order for action, one uses it to respond to the myriad transformations and to deal with things as they arrive: flexible adaptation is sufficient to exhaust the benefits of things, and stirring transformation is sufficient to exhaust wondrous function. Use it to order worldly affairs, and nothing will fail to work—this alone is the Dao of the ancients.

This Dao, though passing through high antiquity, does not appear aged; before Heaven and Earth had formed, it had already existed since antiquity. It is the root that maintains the guiding order, governs the myriad things, and exhausts the wondrous. Whatever is constrained by external things cannot establish itself outside it. As for the fundamental constant principle of the Dao, nothing is more unchanging than this.

Only one who can investigate the origin of things and know their source has all the patterns and laws of the Dao within his mind; therefore it is said, “This is the guiding order of the Dao.”

Chapter Fifteen: Those of ancient times who were skilled in cultivating the Dao were subtle and wondrous, penetrating and profound, so deep that they could not be known by others.

徽宗注曰:古之士则与今之士异矣,善为士则与不善为士者异矣。故微则与道为一,妙则与神同体,玄有以配天,通有以兆圣,而藏用之深,至於不可测。《书》曰:道心惟.微。则微者,道也。《易》曰:神也者,妙万物而为言。则妙者,神也。《易》曰:天玄而地黄。则玄者,天之色。《传》曰:曰:神也者,妙万物而为言。则妙者,神也。《易》曰:天玄而地黄。则玄者,天之色。《传》曰:事无不通之谓圣。则通者,圣之事。水之深者可测也,穴之深者可究也。古之善为士者,微妙玄通,名实不入而机发於踵,其藏深矣,不可测究。列御寇居郑圃四十年,人无识者。老子谓孔子曰:良贾深藏若虚,君子盛德,容貌若愚。其谓是欤?
Interpretation

The shi of antiquity (by which is meant those who cultivate the Dao) were different from the shi of today, and those who were skilled at being shi were also different from those who were not. Thus, the realm of wei (subtlety) is joined as one body with the Dao; the realm of miao (marvelousness) is made one body with Shen (spirit); the realm of xuan (dark profundity) is sufficient to match Heaven; and the realm of tong (penetration) is sufficient to foretell the affairs of the sage. They stored their workings deeply, so deeply that they could not be fathomed.

The Shangshu says, “The mind of the Dao is subtle”; therefore wei is the Dao. The Yi Commentary says, “Shen is that which makes the myriad things marvelous and is spoken of in this way”; therefore miao is Shen. The Wenyan Commentary on the Kun hexagram of the Yi says, “Heaven is xuan and earth is yellow”; therefore xuan is the color of Heaven. The Commentary says, “That which is unobstructed in all affairs is called sage”; therefore tong is the action of the sage.

Water, however deep, can be measured; caves, however deep, can be explored. Those of antiquity who were skilled at being shi possessed these four realms—wei, miao, xuan, and tong (from Laozi, chapter 15): fame and profit and practical concerns could not enter their minds; the stirrings of the calculating mind arose naturally and deeply, as if from the heels. Therefore their inner store was deeply hidden and could not be fathomed or explored.

Lie Yukou (that is, Liezi, a Daoist figure of the Warring States period) lived in seclusion in a garden in Zheng for forty years, and no one knew him. Laozi once said to Confucius: “A good merchant hides his goods deeply and appears as if he has nothing; a junzi of abundant virtue appears outwardly foolish.” This probably refers to people of this kind.

疏义曰:有上古,有中古,古之士则上古之士也。有上士,有下士,善为士则上士之类也。则古之士与今之士异矣,善为士与不善为士异矣。善为士者,其才上达,志於道而与乎神,明於天而通於圣,渊乎其不可测,故微妙玄通,深不可识。盖视之不见名曰微,道无形也,不可以目视,者,其才上达,志於道而与乎神,明於天而通於圣,渊乎其不可测,故微妙玄通,深不可识。盖视之不见名曰微,道无形也,不可以目视,惟知微,故与道为一。《书》所谓道心惟微是也。常无欲以观其妙,神无是也,不可以有求,惟入妙,故与神同体。《易》所谓神妙万物而为言是也。玄之为色,有赤有炁,以能阴能阳故也,而、天之色在是焉。《易》所谓天玄而地黄者,以此。能玄能黄,则与天为徒矣。通之为义,往来不穷,以无物能碍故也,而圣之事在是焉。《传》所谓事无本通之谓圣者,以此。同於大通,则入自圣门矣。古之善为士者,自微妙以至玄通,奭然四解,沦於不测,非若水之深可测,穴之深可究。杜德机而不示,丰智源而音出,名实不入而机发於肿。若火事已而见灰,其藏深矣,不可测究,世何足以识之?昔列御寇居郑圃四十年,人无识者於肿。若火事已而见灰,其藏深矣,不可测究,世何足以识之?昔列御寇居郑圃四十年,人无识者,得此故也。盍圃泽多贤,里非无仁也,历年四十,处非不久也,而人无识之者,则以图滑疑之耀,去形谋之光,人无得而识之也。孟子所谓君子之所为,众人固不识谓是。故尔。老子谓孔子曰:良贾深藏若虚,君子盛德,容貌若愚。则以盛德若不足,犹之良贾可也。此颜子如愚,孔子贤之。
Interpretation

The Shuyi says: There is the age of high antiquity and the age of middle antiquity; the ancient “shi” (a person of virtue and learning) is the shi of high antiquity. Shi are further divided into superior shi and inferior shi, and those skilled at being shi belong to the category of superior shi. Thus the ancient shi differs from the shi of today, and those skilled at being shi differ from those unskilled at being shi.

Those skilled at being shi have talents that reach upward, their aspiration lies in the great Dao (the Way), and they respond to shenming (spirit illumination); they understand the heavenly Dao and penetrate the realm of the sage. Deep and broad, they cannot be fathomed; thus they are subtle and wondrous, mysterious, profound, and penetrating, distant and hard to know. Whenever one looks at it and does not see it, one calls it “wei” (subtle), because the Dao has no form and cannot be seen with the eyes; only one who understands “wei” can become one with the Dao. This is the meaning of what the Shangshu says: “The mind of the Dao is subtle.”

“Constantly without desire, one observes its wonder.” Shenming cannot be attained by seeking it; only by entering the realm of mysterious wonder can one be of one body with Shen (spirit). This is the principle in the Zhouyi: “As for Shen, it is in terms of its wondrous working of the myriad things that it is spoken of.”

The color xuan combines red and the two Qi (vital energy) of Yin-Yang, because it can manifest both Yin and Yang; thus the color of Heaven is contained therein. The Zhouyi says, “Heaven is xuan and Earth is yellow,” which is precisely this meaning. One who can manifest xuan and yellow is of the same kind as Heaven.

The meaning of “tong” (penetration) is endless coming and going, because nothing can obstruct it; the actions of the sage are also contained therein. This is the principle in the Commentary (Zhuan) explaining the classic: “When nothing in affairs is obstructed, this is called sagehood.” To be identified with the great penetration is to enter the gate of the sage.

In antiquity, those skilled at being shi, from the subtle and wondrous all the way to the mysterious, distant, and penetrating, were suddenly transparent and sank into a realm that cannot be measured. This realm is not like the depth of water that can be measured, nor like the depth of a cave that can be explored. They blocked the mind of cunning and did not reveal it; they stored away the source of wisdom and did not let it leak out. Neither name nor substance could invade their hearts; the mind of adaptive contrivance was set in motion only when needed.

It is like fire that has gone out leaving only ashes: the fire hidden within has already withdrawn deeply and cannot be probed—how could the people of the world recognize him? Formerly Lie Yukou (i.e., Liezi, a Daoist figure of the Warring States period) lived for forty years in the gardens of Zheng, and no one recognized him; the reason lies precisely here. It was not that the gardens of Zheng lacked worthy people, nor that the villages lacked humane people; he lived there forty years, which is not a short time, and yet people did not recognize him, because he had removed the radiance of deliberate display and seeking, so that people had no way to know him.

Mencius (a representative Confucian figure of the Warring States period) said, “What the noble person does is originally beyond the understanding of ordinary people.” This is exactly the situation being described.

Laozi (founder of Daoism in the Spring and Autumn period) said to Confucius (founder of Confucianism): “A good merchant hides his goods deeply, appearing as if he has nothing at all; a noble person has abundant De (Virtue/Power), yet his appearance seems dull and simple.” This means that one with abundant De appears outwardly as if lacking something, just like a good merchant. Yanzi (i.e., Yan Hui, a disciple of Confucius renowned for his virtue) was “as if foolish,” and for this Confucius praised him.

夫惟不可识,故强为之容: 徽宗注曰:天之高,不可俄而度也;地之厚,不可俄而测也。曰圆以覆,曰方以载者,拟诸其容而已。强为之容,岂能真索其至? 疏义曰:天统元气,非止荡荡苍苍之谓也,故其高不可俄而度。地统元形,非止山林川泽之谓也,故其厚不可俄而测。穹窿乎上人,谓其圆以覆。磅砖乎下人,地统元形,非止山林川泽之谓也,故其厚不可俄而测。穹窿乎上人,谓其圆以覆。磅砖乎下人,谓其方以载。特拟诸容而强名之尔。善为士者,微妙玄通,深不可识,亦天地已。如下文所云,皆强为之容而已。 豫兮若冬涉川,犹兮若畏四邻。 徽宗注曰:豫者,图息於未然。犹者,致疑於已事。古之体道者,以内游为务,不以通物为乐,恐惧修省,不得已而后应,若冬涉川,守而不失已。若畏四邻,《易》所谓以此斋戒者是也。
Interpretation

First Paragraph (Main Theme of the Scripture)

The height and remoteness of heaven cannot be quickly measured; the depth and thickness of earth cannot be quickly fathomed. To say that heaven is round and covers from above, and that earth is square and bears all things, is merely to draw a rough outline for them. When one forcibly depicts their shapes, how could one truly probe their utmost limits?

The Shuyi further states: Heaven governs primordial Qi, and is not merely the vast expanse of sky before our eyes; therefore its height cannot be easily measured. Earth governs primordial form, and is not merely mountains, forests, rivers, and marshes; therefore its thickness cannot be easily fathomed. That which rises high and vaults above is called round and covering all things; that which lies below, heavy and thick like bedrock, is called square and bearing all things. These are all merely provisional names borrowed from images and forms.

Therefore, those who are skilled in cultivating the Dao have subtle, mysterious, and penetrating depths that are profound and unfathomable, just like heaven and earth. The various descriptions given below are all forced attempts to depict their outward appearance.

Second Paragraph (Scripture: “Hesitant, as if crossing a stream in winter; wary, as if fearing the four neighbors”)

The commentator explains: “Yu” means planning in advance before a matter has arisen and stopping reckless action; “You” means harboring doubts about what has already occurred and repeatedly weighing it. Those in ancient times who realized the great Dao made inner cultivation their priority; they did not take pleasure in contact with external things, but constantly held fear and self-examination in mind, responding to external affairs only when unavoidable. They were careful and cautious, like one crossing a river in winter, fearing a misstep; and like one fearing that neighbors on all sides might peer in, always maintaining vigilance. This is exactly what the Yijing means by “thereby fasting and purification,” that is, restraining oneself with a mind of sincerity and reverence.

疏义曰:先事而图谓之豫,则豫者图息於未然。后事而图谓之犹,则犹者致疑於已事。古之体道者,以内游为务,不以外游为至,以忘物为善,不以通物为乐,恐惧修省,不敢肆也。故於事之未至者,感而后应,迫而后动,不疑於已事。古之体道者,以内游为务,不以外游为至,以忘物为善,不以通物为乐,恐惧修省,不敢肆也。故於事之未至者,感而后应,迫而后动,不得已而后起,先事而图,如冬涉川。於事之已成者,怵然为戒,视为止,行为迟,后事而图,若畏四邻。盖川者难之所在,冬而涉之,人所病也,若冬涉川,岂得已哉?邻者比而恤己,使之相保,人所善也,若畏四邻,岂失己哉?然则有而为其可易耶?《易》言:君子将有为,将有行,必先斋戒以神明其德。盖谓此也。 俨若容, 徽宗注曰:《语》曰:望之俨然。《记》曰:俨若思。庄子曰:物无道,正容以悟之,使人之意也消。全德之人,远之则有望,近之则不厌, 故其状义而不朋。
Interpretation

Planning before the matter arises is “yu”; planning after it has arisen is “you”

Yu means planning before an event occurs and taking precautions before trouble arises; you means hesitating indecisively only after the event has already occurred.

Those in antiquity who realized the Great Dao made inward cultivation their primary task and did not regard outward travel and the pursuit of external things as the highest realm. They considered forgetting external things good and did not take communion with external things as joy. They held reverence in their hearts, constantly reflected, and did not dare to indulge. Therefore, when matters had not yet arrived, they were not eager to respond; only when they felt an influence or were pressed did they act, and only when unavoidable did they rise. This is like crossing a river in winter: one must carefully plan beforehand. Once a matter has already occurred, one must maintain a fearful caution and act slowly; even when planning afterward, one is as careful as if fearing the criticism of the four neighbors.

Rivers are dangerous places, and wading through water in winter is something everyone finds bitter; hence the saying “as if crossing a stream in winter.” This is not a matter of being forced by necessity but of required caution. “Neighbors” are people who look after and protect one another, and people all consider this good; hence the saying “as if fearing the four neighbors.” This too is not a loss of self but an understanding of the proper measure in dealing with others. How, then, could one rashly change when undertaking action? The Yijing says: “When the junzi is about to undertake something or take action, he must first fast and purify himself, so that his De may communicate with the spiritual brightness.” This is what that means.

Solemn as if with a dignified countenance

Yan is a solemn and serious appearance. Song Huizong’s commentary cites the Analects, “looked at from afar, he appears dignified”; the Liji, “grave as if in thought”; and the Zhuangzi, “when others are without the Dao, one rectifies one’s countenance to awaken them, causing their intentions to dissolve,” explaining that rectifying one’s demeanor can transform others and cause their intentions to melt away.

A person of complete De has, from afar, a dignified majesty that can be looked up to, and, when approached, does not make others weary. Therefore his outward condition is appropriate, without partiality or factionalism (“yi” means appropriateness; “bu peng” means not forming cliques).

Supplementary Subcommentary

“To turn inward and dispute with things is like casting off the limbs and lodging oneself among the hundred bones; one’s form then appears as something that may be lightly trampled”: this means that when one turns inward to distinguish and contend with external things, it is as if one forgets the limbs and entrusts oneself to the hundred bones, so that the physical form instead seems despicable and trampled upon. “To go outward and interact with things, then it spreads through the four limbs”: this means that when one goes outward to engage with things, the spirit disperses through the four limbs and loses its inner guard.

疏义曰:入而与物辨,则堕肢体,寓百骸,而其形为可践;出而与物交,则布乎四体,之意也消。全德之人,远之则有望,近之则不厌, 故其状义而不朋。 疏义曰:入而与物辨,则堕肢体,寓百骸,而其形为可践;出而与物交,则布乎四体,形乎动静,而容止为可观。俨若容,则出而交物,容止可观之时也。《语》所谓望之俨然,《记》所谓俨□若思,皆此意也。庄子曰:物无道,正容以悟之,使人之意也消。盖全德之人貌允空虚,与人并立而使人化,况见於动容貌之际乎,正其衣冠,尊其瞻视,远之则有望,在彼为无恶,近之则不厌,在此为无斁,则其使人之意也消,固不难矣。古之真人其状义而不朋,曷尝胁肩谄笑,以自招其辱哉? 涣若冰将释, 徽宗注曰:水凝而为冰,冰释而为水,其实一体。蔽於执一者,如真人其状义而不朋,曷尝胁肩谄笑,以自招其辱哉? 涣若冰将释, 徽宗注曰:水凝而为冰,冰释而为水,其实一体。蔽於执一者,如水之凝;通於大同者,如冰之释。《易》曰:涣,离也。遗物离人而无所系輆,所以为涣。
Interpretation

The subcommentary says: If a person draws inward and distinguishes himself from external things, his spirit will sink into his four limbs and hundred bones, and his physical form will easily be slighted and trampled upon; if he turns outward and engages with things, his spirit and qi will spread throughout his body and manifest in movement and stillness, so that his bearing and conduct become worthy of regard. A solemn bearing when interacting outwardly with others is precisely what makes one’s conduct worthy of observation. What the Analects calls “looked at from afar, he appears dignified and awe-inspiring” and what the Book of Rites calls “solemn as if in thought” both express this principle.

Zhuangzi says: With a person who is unreasonable, if one rectifies one’s demeanor and guides him, his ill will will also dissolve. A person of complete virtue has a sincere and respectful appearance while inwardly empty and clear; standing alongside others, he can transform them—how much more so in the subtle details of moving his countenance? Straighten the cap and robes, make the gaze dignified; from afar there is a respectable awe, so the other does not give rise to evil thoughts; seen up close, he does not weary others. To cause others to dispel ill will is fundamentally not difficult. The Zhenren (Perfected) of ancient times had a proper appearance and did not follow the crowd; how could they hunch their shoulders and bend their backs, force a smile and flatter, and bring disgrace upon themselves?

“Scattered like ice about to melt” describes the spirit relaxing and dissolving, like ice about to thaw. Emperor Huizong of Song’s commentary says: Water congeals into ice, and ice melts into water; originally they are the same thing. Those obscured by attachment to one side are like water congealed into ice; those who penetrate the principle that the ten thousand things are greatly one are like ice melting into water. The Yi says, “Huan means separation,” referring to scattering and separating—that is, forgetting external things and distancing oneself from human affairs without being entangled, and so it is called Huan.

疏义曰:水至清而结冰不清,神至明而结形不明。阴凝之而为冰,犹神之化形也。阳释之而为水,犹形之化神也。水之与冰,其实一体。蔽於执一者,知守形而不知尽神,故如水之凝,生於水而遏水。通於大同者,知忘形而能与於神,故如冰之释,泛然而无留碍也。《易》於风行水上为泱,而《说卦》以谓涣离也,则泱之为义,以离物遗人而无系较故也。惟离物遗人,则若冰解冻释矣而无留碍也。《易》於风行水上为泱,而《说卦》以谓涣离也,则泱之为义,以离物遗人而无系较故也。惟离物遗人,则若冰解冻释矣,孰有系较者乎?与夫其寒凝冰者,固有间矣。《太元》曰无所系较者,圣也。涣若冰将释,所以通有以入圣欤? 敦兮其若朴, 徽宗注曰:敦者,厚之至。性本至厚,如木之朴,未散为器。 疏义曰:《易》所谓敦仁言於仁为至厚,《记》所谓教化言於化为至厚,则敦者厚之至也。惟民生厚则性本厚矣,因物有迁则厚者薄矣。惟善为士者,复性之本,不与物迁,则如木之朴,朴而围之,有象可见,未形为器,其厚可谓至矣。与夫以斤斲之,析其浑全,破为牺尊,青黄而文之,盖有间矣。 旷兮其若谷, 徽宗注曰:旷者,广之极。心原无际,如谷之虚,受而能应。
Interpretation

When water reaches the utmost clarity, it instead congeals into ice and is no longer clear; when Shen (spirit) reaches the utmost luminosity, it instead congeals into physical form and is no longer luminous. Yin Qi causes water to congeal, and water becomes ice—this is like Shen transforming into physical form; Yang Qi causes ice to melt, and ice returns to water—this is like physical form transforming back into Shen. Water and ice are originally the same substance. Those obscured by “holding to one” (fixating on a single side) only know how to guard the physical form and do not understand how to exhaust the nature of Shen. They are like water congealing into ice: ice is produced from water, yet it instead obstructs the flow of water. Those who comprehend “Great Sameness” (the state in which the myriad things are merged into one) understand how to forget the physical form, and thus can accord with Shen. They are like ice that has melted—buoyant and free, without the slightest obstruction.

The Yijing says, “Wind moves over water: Huan (Dispersion).” The Shuogua Zhuan explains this as “huan li” (dispersion and separation). It is clear, then, that the meaning of huan is to depart from external things and forget oneself, without entanglement or calculation. Precisely because one can leave things behind and forsake the body, one is like ice that has thawed and melted, utterly without obstruction—where could entanglement or calculation still be? As for the state in which cold Qi congeals into ice, it is plainly very different from this. The Taiyuan Jing says, “The one who has nothing to entangle or calculate is the sage.” Dispersing like ice about to melt—this is probably the path that leads to the sage’s realm.

Sincere and Uncarved, as if Plain Wood

Huizong’s commentary explains “dun” as thickness brought to its utmost. Human nature is originally extremely pure and thick, like uncut timber that has not yet been split apart or made into an artifact.

The Shuyi says: The “dun ren” spoken of in the Yijing means humaneness at its thickest; the “jiaohua” spoken of in the Liji means transforming instruction at its thickest. Thus “dun” is the utmost of thickness. People are born with a thick nature, but because external things entice them, they shift and change, and thickness turns into thinness. Those who excel at being shi (scholar-gentlemen) can restore the root of their nature and do not shift with external things. They are like uncarved wood, preserving its undifferentiated wholeness. It has visible form, yet it has not yet become a vessel; such thickness may be said to have reached its utmost. As for splitting it with axes, destroying its undivided body, carving it into a beautiful xizun (an ancient ox-shaped sacrificial wine vessel), and then painting it with blue and yellow colors—that is far removed from its original state.

Vast and Open, as if a Valley

Huizong’s commentary explains “kuang” as breadth brought to its utmost. The mind is originally without boundary, like a valley: empty, able to contain the myriad things, and able to respond and echo.

疏义曰:《诗》所谓旷野文之,盖有间矣。 旷兮其若谷, 徽宗注曰:旷者,广之极。心原无际,如谷之虚,受而能应。 疏义曰:《诗》所谓旷野,言其地之至广,《传》所谓旷日,言其时之至广,则旷者广之极也。方寸与太虚齐空,则心原无际矣。无所不包,实无所包,则其室常虚矣。惟善为士者,政虚之极,尽心之真,如谷之能受,受而不积,如谷之能应,应而不着,其广可谓至也。与夫六凿相攘,自狭其居,以实妨道,动辄有碍,盖有间矣。 浑兮其若浊。 徽宗注曰:不刿雕以为康,不矫激以为异,浑然而已,故若浊。与修身以明污者异矣。 疏义曰:至人之游世,和光而同尘,毁方而丸合,大廉不嗛,行非刻制,未尝刿雕以为康也。不多辟异,为在从众,未常矫激以为异也。行险而顺,与物宛转,不立圭角,浑然而已。众人昭昭,我而丸合,大廉不嗛,行非刻制,未尝刿雕以为康也。不多辟异,为在从众,未常矫激以为异也。行险而顺,与物宛转,不立圭角,浑然而已。众人昭昭,我独若昏,似浊而非浊也,与修身以明污者异矣。 孰能浊以静之徐清?孰能安以动之徐生?
Interpretation

The “expansive wilderness” (kuangye) spoken of in the Shijing refers to land of utmost breadth; the “expansive days” (kuangri) spoken of in the Commentary refers to time of utmost length. From this we know that kuang means expansiveness carried to the utmost. The original source of the mind has no boundary; the square-inch heart is as empty and broad as the Great Void, and therefore the mind has no boundary. The mind encompasses all things, yet it does not cling to what it encompasses; thus the inner mind constantly preserves emptiness. Scholars skilled in cultivating the Dao take emptiness and stillness to their utmost and do all they can to preserve the true purity of the mind. Like a valley that can contain the myriad things—accepting without hoarding, responding without lingering—only such expansiveness reaches the utmost. But if the six apertures—ear, eye, mouth, nose, mind, and knowledge (which the Zhuangzi calls the “six clefts”)—disturb one another, and one narrows one’s own dwelling place, using things with form to obstruct the Great Dao, then obstruction meets one at every movement, and one is far from the realm of kuang.

Emperor Huizong’s commentary says: Not deliberately carving and polishing in order to seek security, not deliberately acting with intensity in order to establish novelty, merely being natural and complete as formed by Heaven—this is why it says “seems turbid.” This differs from the practice, in self-cultivation, of deliberately displaying one’s own purity and cleanness in order to set off others’ impurity by contrast.

The Shuyi says: The Perfect Man (zhiren), one whose moral cultivation has reached the highest level, travels through the world, conceals his radiance, and mingles with the dust and the mundane (from the Laozi: “harmonize its light, merge with its dust”); he blunts his edges and is round and harmonious in accord with things. The greatly incorruptible do not appear harsh; in action they do not demand the rigid and exacting, and they never deliberately adorn themselves in order to seek comfort and security. They do not seek much that is extraordinary, delight in following along with the crowd, and never intentionally overcorrect in order to appear different from others. Even in dangerous circumstances they can accord, changing with the myriad things according to circumstance, not setting up sharp edges, merely remaining an undifferentiated whole. The crowd are all bright and clear, haggling over trifles, while he alone seems dim; he looks as though turbid, but in reality he is not truly turbid. This is utterly different from the practice, in self-cultivation, of deliberately showing clarity and displaying purity.

Who can, amid turbidity, maintain stillness and settle, so that it slowly becomes clear? Who can, amid stability, maintain movement, so that it slowly grows?

徽宗注曰:有道之士,即动而静,时骋而要其宿,定而能应,至无而供其求。故静之徐清而物莫能浊,动之徐生而物莫能安。《易》曰:来徐徐。徐者,安行而自适之意。至人之用心,非以静止为善,而有意於静;非以生出为功,而有为于生也。因其固然,付之自尔,而无休迫之情、遑遽之劳,故曰徐清。静之徐清,万物无足以挠其心,故孰能浊?动之徐生,万物无足以系其虑,故孰能安?安有止之意,为物所系,则止矣,岂能应物而不伤。 疏义曰:自豫兮若冬涉川,至浑兮其若浊,应世之述如,为物所系,则止矣,岂能应物而不伤。
Interpretation

Huizong’s commentary (Emperor Huizong of Song) says: One who possesses the Dao is as though still even when moving; he races along with the times yet keeps his fundamental home. When settled, he can accord with all things; within emptiness, he can satisfy what all things require. Thus, when still, his mind gradually clears, and external things cannot muddy it; when moving, he gradually brings forth all things, and external things cannot unsettle him. The Yijing says, “It comes slowly and gently.” “Xu” means proceeding steadily, naturally, and at ease. The perfected person (one of the highest moral cultivation) employs his mind: he does not take stillness as something good and therefore deliberately keep to quietude, nor does he take bringing forth all things as an accomplishment and therefore deliberately do something. He follows things as they inherently are and lets them develop naturally, without urgency or frantic exertion; hence it is said, “gradually clears.” Being still so as to clear gradually, all things cannot disturb his mind—who then can make him turbid? Moving so as to bring forth gradually, all things cannot entangle his thoughts—who then can make him unsettled? If the mind retains the notion of “stopping” and is tied down by external things, it stagnates; how then can it accord with all things without being harmed?

The subcommentary (annotation) says: “Hesitant, as if cautiously crossing a river in winter; muddled, like turbid water that embraces all.” When according with worldly affairs, if one is tied down by external things, the mind stagnates; how then can one accord with all things without being harmed?

Notes: The Yi refers to the Zhouyi; this line comes from the Yijing’s Yu Hexagram (or a related passage in the Tuanzhuan). The phrase “lai xu xu” means coming slowly and unhurriedly. The perfected person (zhiren) is, in Daoist teaching, one who has reached the highest level of moral cultivation. In “xu qing” and “xu sheng,” xu here means slow, unhurried, and natural; it is not simply the opposite of urgency but denotes a state free from hastiness and impatience, one that follows nature.

疏义曰:自豫兮若冬涉川,至浑兮其若浊,应世之述如此,则以体道故也。惟体道,故动静不失其时,而物莫能累,是以守静为筒。效物以动,则即动而静,时骋而要其宿,非流於动也,故动而无所逐,物孰能浊?有所定矣。感而遂通,则定而能应,至无以供其求,非胶於静也,故止而无所碍,物孰能安?夫物之不能浊,以静之徐清故也。物之不能安,以动之徐生故也。静之徐清,非以静止为善,而有意於静也。虽滥而不失其滥,汨之而常自若焉,万物岂足以挠其心?动之徐生,非以生出为功,而有为於生也。不滞於一隅,时出而应之焉,万物岂足以系其虑?盖徐者,安行而自适之意,与《生出为功,而有为於生也。不滞於一隅,时出而应之焉,万物岂足以系其虑?盖徐者,安行而自适之意,与《易》言来徐徐同义。一动一静,因其固然,不悖於理,付之自尔,不拂其性,皆安行而自适,又孰有休迫之恐、遑遽之劳哉?安有止之意,作之而不止甚矣,止之而不作亦甚矣。时作时止,不为物所系,孰能伤之?盖为物所系则止矣,恶能应物而不伤? 保此道者不欲盈。
Interpretation

The subcommentary says: Cautious and reserved, as if crossing a river in winter; simple and solid, as if turbid water concealing itself. To respond to the world and elucidate principle in this way is because one has already embodied the Dao (ti Dao, personally according with the great Dao). Only one who has embodied the Dao can be just right in both movement and stillness, and external things can no longer entangle the mind; therefore one should take guarding stillness as the fundamental norm.

When moving in response to external things, stillness is present within movement. Riding forth at the proper time yet still returning to the root (su means original nature, the root), one does not sink into movement; thus one moves without pursuit, and how could external things make one turbid? This is stability. Responding to external things and immediately penetrating them, one can respond to change within stillness. Having no demand to reach the utmost, and not clinging to stillness, one stops without obstruction; how could external things make one uneasy?

The reason external things cannot make the mind turbid is that stillness gradually clarifies it; the reason they cannot make it uneasy is that movement gradually gives rise to the myriad things. To be still and gradually clear is not to regard stillness as good, nor to seek stillness deliberately. Though there is disturbance, one does not lose the nature of that disturbance; letting it stir, the mind remains peaceful as before—how could external things be sufficient to disturb it? To move and gradually generate is not to take generation as merit, nor to seek generation deliberately. Without dwelling in one corner, one comes forth at the proper time and responds—how could external things be sufficient to entangle one’s thoughts?

The word xu means being composed and self-possessed, moving peacefully; it is used in the Zhouyi in the same way as “coming slowly.” In movement and stillness alike, following what is inherent, not contravening the order of things, allowing things to be natural, not opposing one’s nature—all are states of peaceful self-appropriateness. How then could there still be urgent fear or hurried fatigue? If the mind already has a deliberate thought of stopping, then forcing oneself to act without stopping is certainly excessive; forcing oneself to stop without acting is equally excessive. Sometimes acting and sometimes stopping, not entangled by external things—who can harm it? If one is entangled by external things, one can only stagnate and cannot move forward; how then can one respond to external things without being harmed?

Those who preserve this Dao do not seek fullness.

徽宗注曰:有积也,故不足。无藏也,故有余?至人无积,亦虚而已。保此道而以天下之美为尽在己者,亦已小矣,故不欲盈。经曰:大白若辱,广德若不足。 疏义曰:以囷藏禾,禾尽囷虚,以皿藏水,水尽皿虚。草之盛物,取之如禅;矣,故不欲盈。经曰:大白若辱,广德若不足。 疏义曰:以囷藏禾,禾尽囷虚,以皿藏水,水尽皿虚。草之盛物,取之如禅;赞之盛物,有时而匮。以有积,故不足也。至无以供万物之求,至虚以应天下之实,以无藏,故有余也。道运而无积,用之或不盈,至人保此道而无积,亦虚而已。苟以天下之美为尽在己,是犹擅一壑以自足,亦以小矣。秋水时至,河伯自喜,所以见笑於大方之家。经曰:大白若辱,盛德若不足。岂有满假之累哉? 夫惟不盈,故能敝不新成。
Interpretation

Song Huizong’s commentary says: When things are accumulated, there will be insufficiency; when nothing is stored, there is instead surplus. The Perfected Person (one who has cultivated the Dao [the Way] to the utmost) does not accumulate anything; the mind is simply empty. If one keeps to this Dao yet believes that all the beauty of the world lies in oneself, that is a small-minded view; therefore one does not wish to fill oneself to overflowing. The Daodejing says: “Great whiteness seems soiled; vast De (Virtue/Power) seems insufficient.”

The subcommentary says: Use a round granary to store grain—when the grain is taken completely, the granary becomes empty. Use a vessel to hold water—when the water is poured out completely, the vessel becomes empty. Although the myriad things flourish, after being taken and used they will ultimately become depleted; because there is accumulation, there is insufficiency. Only when the Dao reaches nothingness can it supply what the myriad things require; only when it reaches emptiness can it respond to the actual needs of the world. Because it does not store, it has surplus. The Dao operates without accumulating; even when used, it is not necessarily full. The Perfected Person holds to this Dao without accumulating, merely preserving emptiness. If one takes all the beauty under Heaven to be in oneself, it is like monopolizing a single ravine and being self-satisfied—that is far too narrow. When the autumn floods arrived, the Lord of the River was pleased with himself because of it, but he was laughed at by those of broad understanding (the “great house”) (an allusion to Zhuangzi, “Autumn Floods”). The Daodejing says: “Great whiteness seems soiled; abundant De seems insufficient.” How then could there still be any entanglement brought about by fullness?

Only by not being full and overflowing can worn-out things be continuously renewed and brought to completion anew.

徽宗注曰:有敝故有新,有成故有坏。新故相代,如彼四时;成坏相因,如彼万物。自道而降丽于形数者,盖莫不然。惟道无体,虚而不盈,故能敝能新,能成能坏,超然出乎形数之四时;成坏相因,如彼万物。自道而降丽于形数者,盖莫不然。惟道无体,虚而不盈,故能敝能新,能成能坏,超然出乎形数之外,而未常敝,未尝坏也。故曰夫惟不盈,故能敝不新成。木始荣而终悴,火初明而末熄,以有新也,故敝随之。曰中则昃,月满则亏,以有成也,故坏继之。有道者异乎此。
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of the Song comments: Where there is decay, there is renewal; where there is completion, there is destruction. The new and the old replace one another like the turning of the four seasons; completion and ruin depend on one another like the birth and extinction of the ten thousand things. Everything that is born from Dao (the Way)—the root and source of the universe—and attaches to “forms and numbers” (xingshu, the concrete world of embodied, measurable things) is no exception. Only Dao has no fixed form; it is empty and not full. Thus it can both decay and renew, both complete and destroy; transcending forms and numbers, it has never decayed and has never been destroyed. Therefore it is said: precisely because Dao is not full, it can decay without being renewed and be completed without being destroyed. When plants and trees first flourish, they eventually wither; when a flame first burns bright, it finally goes out—this is because there is the “new,” and so “wornness” (decay) follows. When the sun reaches noon it declines to the west; when the moon is full it wanes—this is because there is “completion,” and so “ruin” immediately appears. One who possesses Dao is not like this.

疏义曰:有形则有新敝,有数则有成坏。春先夏从,更旺更废,运为四时,新故相代者然也。言唱手执,迭盛迭衰,散为万事,成坏相因者然也。此皆堕於形数之域,故方新而敝,成已俄坏,莫能进之者。惟道无体,不囿於形,故能新能敝而未尝敝,不丽於数,故能成能坏而未尝坏,以虚而不盈故也。今夫木之为物,蕃鲜於春,而摇落於冬,则始荣而终悴也。火之为物,用之弥明,而扑之则灭,则初明而末熄也。出一而旦,入六而冥,曰虽为阳之精,未免乎中则昃也。三五而盈则灭,则初明而末熄也。出一而旦,入六而冥,曰虽为阳之精,未免乎中则昃也。三五而盈,三五而阙,月虽为阴之精,未免乎满则亏也。凡以域乎形数,故有新而弊,随之有成,而坏继之故尔。有道者虚而不盈,超然出乎形数之外,故能弊能新,能成能坏,而未尝敝,未尝坏也。 致虚极章第十六 致虚极,守静笃。 徽宗注曰:莫贵乎虚,莫善乎静,虚静者,万物之本也。虚故足以受群实,静故足以应群动。极者,众会而有所至。笃者,力行而有所至。政虚而要其极,守静而至于笃,则万态虽杂而吾心常彻,万变虽殊而吾心常寂。此之谓天乐,非体道者不足以与此。
Interpretation

Subcommentary on the True Scripture of the Way and Its Virtue

Every thing with physical form is subject to the alternation of old and new and to wear and damage; every thing governed by quantity and regularity is subject to generation and destruction. In spring things first sprout, in summer they continue and flourish; as one wanes the other waxes, and after flourishing comes decline. Cycling back and forth, they form the four seasons; the mutual replacement of new and old is precisely this principle. Among things, too, there is successive rise and successive decline; they disperse and transform into the myriad things, and completion and destruction are causes of one another—this is likewise so. All of this falls within the scope of “form and number” (concrete things that possess form and are constrained by quantitative regularity), and therefore no sooner have they been renewed than they begin to decay; no sooner have they been completed than they quickly perish. No one can make this process stop.

Only Dao has no fixed form and is not confined by form. Therefore it can renew and can decay, yet never truly decays; it is not bound by number, and therefore it can complete and can destroy, yet never truly is destroyed. This is because Dao is empty and is not filled.

For example, wood in spring is full of vitality, tender and lush, but in winter it withers and dries up: this is beginning in flourishing and ending in decline. Fire, when fuel is added, burns ever more brightly, but once smothered it goes out: this is beginning in brightness and ending in extinction. The sun rises in the east in the morning and enters darkness in the evening; although it is the essence of yang Qi, it cannot avoid beginning to slant west at noon. The moon is full on the fifteenth day and afterward gradually wanes; although it is the essence of yin Qi, it cannot avoid moving toward deficiency after fullness.

Whatever falls within “form and number” is new and then old, is completed accordingly, and then destroyed. The person who possesses Dao, however, is empty and still and does not fill himself; he stands beyond form and number. Therefore he can undergo decay and renewal, completion and destruction, yet in the end never truly decays or is destroyed.

Chapter Sixteen: Reaching the Extremity of Emptiness

Original text: “Reach the extremity of emptiness; guard stillness firmly.”

Emperor Huizong of Song’s annotation and interpretation:

There is nothing more valuable than emptiness, nothing better than stillness; emptiness and stillness are the root of the myriad things. Because the heart is empty, it can contain the actuality of the myriad things; because the heart is still, it can accord with all kinds of change. “Extremity” means that many things gather and reach their end; “firmly” means that one applies oneself single-mindedly and earnestly until one reaches profundity. Therefore, if one makes the heart empty to the utmost and guards stillness to profundity, then although the myriad scenes are mixed and various, my heart remains clear and penetrating throughout; although the ten thousand changes are different, my heart remains peaceful and tranquil throughout. This is what is called “heavenly joy” (the supreme joy of nature). Unless one has embodied and realized the great Dao, one is not sufficient to comprehend this realm.

疏义曰:同乃虚,虚乃大,大则能兼覆而不遗,故列子言寂。此之谓天乐,非体道者不足以与此。 疏义曰:同乃虚,虚乃大,大则能兼覆而不遗,故列子言莫贵乎虚。虚则静,静则明,明则能照临而无外,故列子言莫贵乎静。无所於忤,是之谓虚,而天下之实莫逃乎虚。一而不变,是之谓静,而天下之动不离乎静。此庄子所以言虚静者,万物之本也。经所谓渊兮似万物之宗,亦若是而已。夫万物以形相碍,以数相摄,囿於形则为形累,摄於数则为数役,必有超形离数者,其惟虚静乎?虚故足以受群实,静故足以应群动,以不碍於形,不摄於数故也。然而探虚静之本,虽得之自然;要虚静之至,必在乎政守。致之至於极,守之至於笃,则静也,。然而探虚静之本,虽得之自然;要虚静之至,必在乎政守。致之至於极,守之至於笃,则静也,虚也,得其居矣。极犹屋之有极,群村必集,是众会而有所至也。笃犹马之尽力,千里可至,是力行而有所至也。致虚期於极,则涤除外慕,一疵不睹,非特未始有物,至於未始有夫未始有物焉,此致虚而要其极也。守静者期於笃,则湛然常寂,未始其撄,非特离动而静,至於即动而静焉,此守静而至于笃也。致虚极而不以实妨之,守静笃而不以动违之,则万态虽杂,吾心常彻,万变虽殊,吾心常寂。夫芸芸之物,至於即动而静焉,此守静而至于笃也。致虚极而不以实妨之,守静笃而不以动违之,则万态虽杂,吾心常彻,万变虽殊,吾心常寂。夫芸芸之物,情伪不同,是谓万态。扰扰之绪,迭作不常,是谓万变。万态虽杂,心常彻者,虚足以受之也。彻与心彻为智之彻同。万变虽殊,而心常寂者,静足以应之也。寂与寂然不动之寂同。致虚守静,一至於此,是为天地之平,道德之至,此之谓大本大宗,与天和者也。其为天乐,孰大於是?观庄周之论虚静,既曰一心定而王天下,又曰一心定而万物服,盖能定然后能应,所谓常彻常寂,一心定之谓也。惟夫一心定,然后能以虚静推於天地,通於万物,其为乐可胜计耶?
Interpretation

The general meaning of this passage from the Subcommentary on the True Scripture of the Dao and De is as follows.

“Tong” (sameness) means emptiness. Only emptiness can be vast; only vastness can encompass and cover all without omission. That is why Liezi speaks of “silence.” This state may be called “heavenly joy” (natural joy); unless one has realized the Dao, one is not capable of understanding it.

In the next passage, again beginning with “Tong is emptiness; emptiness is greatness; greatness can cover all without omission,” Liezi also says, “Nothing is more honorable than emptiness.” Emptiness brings quietude; quietude brings clarity; clarity enables one to illuminate all things without being confined by external things. That is why Liezi also says, “Nothing is more honorable than stillness.” To offer no resistance or opposition to external things is emptiness; none of the actual things in the world can escape the scope of emptiness. To remain always one and unchanging is stillness; none of the movements in the world can depart from stillness. This is precisely why Zhuangzi takes emptiness and stillness as the root of all things; Laozi’s statement, “Deep! It seems to be the ancestor of all things,” has the same meaning.

All things obstruct one another because they have form, and constrain one another because they have number. Bound by form, they are burdened by form; constrained by number, they are enslaved by number. There must then be something that transcends form and escapes number—perhaps only emptiness and stillness? Emptiness, therefore, can contain all actual things; stillness, therefore, can respond to all changes. For it is not obstructed by form, nor constrained by number.

In seeking the root of emptiness and stillness, although it is obtained naturally, to reach the utmost of emptiness and stillness one must apply effort and maintain it. Bring emptiness to its utmost, and guard stillness in earnest. When emptiness is brought to its utmost, external covetousness and admiration are washed away, and not a single flaw is seen. Not only is there no thought of “there being things,” there is not even the thought of “there never having begun to be things”: this is emptiness brought to its utmost. To guard stillness in earnest is to be pure, peaceful, and constantly still, untouched by even a trace of disturbance. This is not merely leaving movement and attaining stillness; it is stillness in the very midst of movement. This is guarding stillness and attaining its solidity.

When emptiness is brought to its utmost, one is no longer obstructed by actual things; when stillness is guarded in earnest, one no longer goes against movement. Then, though the ten thousand states are mixed and complex, the mind remains constantly penetratingly clear; though the ten thousand changes are different, the mind remains constantly still. The myriad things, with appearances and conditions true and false each differing, are called the “ten thousand states”; the tangled threads of affairs, appearing in turn and changing without constancy, are called the “ten thousand changes.” Though the ten thousand states are mixed, the mind remains constantly clear, because emptiness is sufficient to contain them (here “penetrating clarity” has the same meaning as “penetration” in “when the mind is penetrating, it is wisdom”). Though the ten thousand changes are different, the mind remains constantly still, because stillness is sufficient to respond to them (here “still” has the same meaning as in “still and unmoving”).

To bring emptiness to its utmost and guard stillness—if one can reach this stage, this is the balance of Heaven and Earth and the utmost of Dao and De. It is called the “Great Root and Great Ancestor” (the root and sovereign), the realm of harmonious communion with Heaven. What joy could be greater than this?

Again, when Zhuangzi discusses emptiness and stillness, he says both “with the single mind settled, one can rule all under Heaven” and “with the single mind settled, all things submit.” Presumably one must first settle the mind before one can respond to all things. What is called “constantly penetrating and constantly still” means precisely that the single mind is settled. It is precisely because the single mind is settled that one can extend emptiness and stillness to Heaven and Earth and penetrate all things. How could such joy be fully calculated?

万物并作,吾以观其复。 徽宗注曰:万物之变,在道之末,体道者寓乎万物之上焉。物之生,有所乎萌也,终复。 徽宗注曰:万物之变,在道之末,体道者寓乎万物之上焉。物之生,有所乎萌也,终有所乎归。方其并作而趋于动出之涂,吾观其动者之必静,及出者之必复,而因以见天地之心,则交物而不与物俱化,此之谓观其复。
Interpretation

All things arise together and flourish; from this I observe the principle of their cyclical return.

Emperor Huizong (Zhao Ji, emperor of the Northern Song, who personally annotated the Daodejing) says: The transformations of all things all lie at the outer end of Dao (the Way), the fundamental pattern of the universe’s operation—that is, they are manifested among concrete, tangible things. Those who attain Dao lodge themselves beyond the ten thousand things and can contemplate all things with detachment. When things are generated, each has its first sprouting; after sprouting, it must ultimately return and has its final destination. When all things arise together and move toward activity and generation, I see that what moves must return to stillness and what departs must return; from this I perceive the original mind of Heaven and Earth. In this way, one engages with external things without changing along with them—this is called “observing their return.”

疏义曰:气变有形,形变有生,在形而下无动而不变也。故万物之变,在道之末。圣人体道,立乎万物之上,总一其成理而治之,所以能寓乎万物之上焉。且万物之生,役於造化,随序相理,桥运相使,出於机而流形,则生有所乎萌,入於机而复命,则终有所乎归。若有真宰而不得其朕,方其并作也,由乎艮之径路,达乎震之大涂,茁而出,萌而明,职职陈露,趋于动出之涂。圣人达万物之理,虚静之中,徐以泛观,知万物职职,皆从无为殖,虽动而不离於静,虽出而未尝不复。观动者之必静,及出者之必复,而因以见天地之心焉。皆从无为殖,虽动而不离於静,虽出而未尝不复。观动者之必静,及出者之必复,而因以见天地之心焉。在《易》之《复》有曰:复,其见天地之心乎。盖复者,小而辨於物之时。辨於物,则至静而未始其撄,万物无足以饶之者也。圣人无常心,一本诸天地,虽纷而封,虽樱而宁,交物而不与物俱化,非离交而辨能,即交而辨焉。故於物之并作,以观其复也。虽然老氏於观复则曰并作者,盖有无作止。理虽异,致其於达观则一而已。 夫物芸芸,各归其也。虽然老氏於观复则曰并作者,盖有无作止。理虽异,致其於达观则一而已。 夫物芸芸,各归其根。
Interpretation

Once Qi (vital energy) changes, it takes on form; once form changes, life is produced. These all belong to things that have form, and so there is no moment when they are not changing. The transformations of the myriad things all take place at the far end of Dao (the Way)—that is, within the range where Dao manifests and acts. The sage realizes Dao, takes his stand above the myriad things, and governs them by presiding over their completed patterns; therefore he can stand transcendently above the myriad things while being in communication with them.

The generation of the myriad things is driven by creative transformation—the natural nurturing and transformation of Heaven and Earth—and they are interrelated, move, and draw one another along in ordered sequence. They emerge from the pivot of creative transformation and take form, and thus the sprout of life appears; they return again into the pivot and go back to their original destiny, and thus there is the destination of their end. If one says that within this there is a True Sovereign ruling the myriad things, yet its traces cannot be perceived. When the myriad things rise and grow together, along the small path of the Gen position (northeast, symbolizing Stillness) they lead to the great road of the Zhen position (east, symbolizing Movement); they break through the earth, sprout and become visible, clearly manifesting themselves, and hasten along the path of movement and life.

The sage comprehends the principles of the myriad things and, in emptiness and stillness, gently surveys them broadly. He knows that the myriad things, appearing in profusion, all grow from Wuwei (non-action). Though they move, they do not depart from stillness; though they have appeared, they never fail to return. From this one sees that movement must return to stillness and emergence must return to recurrence, and thereby one perceives the mind of Heaven and Earth.

The Fu (Return) hexagram of the Yijing says, “Return—in it one sees the mind of Heaven and Earth!” The meaning of return lies in discerning the timing of things from subtle beginnings. If one can discern the timing of things, one can remain in ultimate stillness and not be disturbed, and the myriad things cannot disturb him. The sage has no fixed private mind; in all things he takes Heaven and Earth as his foundation. Amid complexity he remains closed and does not expose himself; amid turmoil he remains peaceful. He comes into contact with things but does not change along with them. This is not a matter of leaving contact behind in order to discern; it is discerning within contact itself. Therefore, when the myriad things arise together, one must observe their going and returning.

Nevertheless, when Laozi speaks of observing return, he still says “arise together,” because things differ in that there is action and rest. Though the formulations differ, the attainment of penetrating observation is in fact the same.

The myriad things flourish in profusion, each returning to its root.

徽宗注曰:芸芸者,动出之象。万物出乎震,相见乎离,则芸芸并作,英华发外。说乎兑,劳乎坎,则去华就实,归其性宅。命者,性之本,而性其根也。精者,神之母,而神其子也。精全则神王,尽性则至於命。 疏义曰:物生若芸,徐动而出,则芸芸者,动出之象也。然物之动出,各因其时。观四时之运行,具八卦之妙用,万物之出,与之出而不辞,万物之入,与之入而不连。故自春租夏,为天出而之人;自秋祖冬,为人入而之天。自其出而之人言之,则出乎震,而震者束方之卦也,於时为春,物皆萌动;相见乎离,而离者南方之卦也,於时为夏,物皆蕃鲜,所谓芸芸并作,英华发外也。自其入而见乎离,而离者南方之卦也,於时为夏,物皆蕃鲜,所谓芸芸并作,英华发外也。自其入而之天言之,则说乎兑,而兑者西方之卦也,於时为秋,物皆至於揫敛;劳乎坎,而坎者北方之卦也,於时为冬,物自归根,所谓去华就实,归其性宅也。芸芸并作,则春气发而百草生也。至於英华发外,则苗而秀矣。去华就实,则正得秋而万宝成也。至於归其性宅,则复於无物矣。《易》曰:各正性命,保合太和。则播大钧而凝形者,性命固已均禀。庄子曰:精神生於道,形本生於精。则散专精而孕气者,精神固已和会。然天使我有是之谓命,命之在我之谓性。能顺其命,乃能正其性,是命者性之本而性其根也。人之有生,精具而神从之,能保其精,乃能合其神,是精者神之母而神顺其命,乃能正其性,是命者性之本而性其根也。人之有生,精具而神从之,能保其精,乃能合其神,是精者神之母而神其子也。惟知性达命,然后能自本自根,全之而不伤性;因精集神,然后能得母知子,守之而不失。所谓精全则神王,非因精集神者能之乎?所谓尽性至於命,非知性达命者能之乎?庄子论纯素之道,始言一之精通,终言不亏其神,则精全神王可知也。孟子论尽心之道,始言养性事天,终言修身立命,则尽性至命可知也。能明乎此,其?庄子论纯素之道,始言一之精通,终言不亏其神,则精全神王可知也。孟子论尽心之道,始言养性事天,终言修身立命,则尽性至命可知也。能明乎此,其於达万物之理,特观复者之余事。
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of Song (Zhao Ji) commented: “Yunyun” is the appearance of the myriad things stirring, generating, and emerging. The myriad things are born from the Zhen trigram of the Bagua (Eight Trigrams) in the east and meet in the Li trigram in the south; thus vegetation flourishes and grows together, and the brilliance of flowers and leaves is revealed outwardly. When they reach the Dui trigram in the west, the myriad things rejoice and contract; when they reach the Kan trigram in the north, the myriad things toil and return to storage; thus they discard flourishing display, move toward fruit, and return to the home of their respective nature and destiny. “Ming (destiny)” is the root of “Xing (nature),” and “Xing” is the foundation of “Ming”; “Jing (essence)” is the mother of “Shen (spirit),” and “Shen” is the child born of “Jing.” When jing and qi are complete, shen becomes vigorous; if one can exhaust one’s nature, one can reach the realm of heavenly destiny.

The Daode Zhenjing Shuyi further explains: When plants grow, they rise in profusion and slowly stir and emerge—this is the dynamic described by “yunyun.” The generation and storage of the myriad things each follow their season. Observing the movement of the four seasons and comprehending the wondrous function of the Bagua, one knows that when the myriad things come forth they come forth in accord, and when they return they return in accord. Thus from spring to summer, the Dao of Heaven pushes the myriad things into the human world; from autumn to winter, the things of the human world return to the Dao of Heaven.

From the direction of the myriad things emerging into the human world: the Zhen trigram belongs to the east and corresponds to spring, when the myriad things begin to stir; the Li trigram belongs to the south and corresponds to summer, when the myriad things flourish and are bright—this is precisely “yunyun arise together, their flowering brilliance appears outwardly.” From the direction of the myriad things returning to the Dao of Heaven: the Dui trigram belongs to the west and corresponds to autumn, when the myriad things tend toward contraction and ripening; the Kan trigram belongs to the north and corresponds to winter, when the myriad things return to the root—this is precisely “shedding flower to approach fruit, returning to the home of their nature.”

“Yunyun arise together” is like the spring qi stirring and the hundred grasses sprouting; “flowering brilliance appears outwardly” is like shoots growing and putting forth ears and flowers; “shedding flower to approach fruit” is like receiving the autumn qi and the myriad things forming fruit; “returning to the home of their nature” is then the return to the original state of no-thing.

The Yijing says, “Each rectifies its nature and destiny, preserving and harmonizing the Great Harmony.” This means that when Heaven and Earth transform and nurture the myriad things and condense them into form, the Xing and Ming endowed to each life are originally equal. Zhuangzi says, “Jing and shen are born from the Dao; the bodily form is rooted in jing.” This means that when Heaven and Earth disperse jing and qi and nurture the vitality of life, jing and shen are originally harmonious and mutually penetrating. What Heaven bestows on humans is called “Ming”; what is received in me and becomes my own is called “Xing.” Only by complying with heavenly destiny can one rectify one’s Xing; therefore it says, “Ming is the root of Xing, and Xing is the foundation of Ming.”

When a person is born, jing is present first, and shen follows. Only by preserving jing can one cause shen to condense; therefore it says, “Jing is the mother of shen, and shen is the child of jing.”

Only by understanding one’s nature and penetrating heavenly destiny can one be rooted in oneself and self-originating, preserving one’s nature without harming it; only by relying on jing and qi to gather and concentrate the spirit can one grasp the relation between mother and child, guard it, and not lose it. Therefore it says, “When jing is complete, shen is sovereign”—is this not something that can be done only by relying on jing and qi to gather and concentrate the spirit? What is called “exhausting one’s nature and reaching destiny”—is this not something only one who understands one’s nature and penetrates heavenly destiny can do?

Zhuangzi’s discussion of the Dao of pure simplicity begins with the purity and penetration of the One and ends with not impairing one’s shen; thus the principle of “when jing is complete, shen is sovereign” can be known. Mencius’s discussion of the Dao of exhausting the mind begins with nourishing one’s nature and serving Heaven and ends with cultivating oneself and establishing one’s destiny; thus the principle of “exhausting one’s nature and reaching destiny” can be known. One who understands these can penetrate the principles of the myriad things; as for observing the principle of the myriad things returning to their root, that is merely a remaining matter within it.

归根曰静,静曰复命。 徽宗注曰:留动而生物,物生成理,谓之形。形体保神,各有仪则,谓之性。未形者有分,且然无间,谓之命。命亘古今而常存,性更万形而不易,全其形生之人去智与故,归於寂定,则知命之在我,如彼春夏复为秋冬。体性抱神,中以自考,此之谓复命。
Interpretation

Explanation of the Scripture Passage:

“Returning to the root” means returning to the source of the myriad things; the state of having returned to the source is “stillness.” To be able to return to stillness is “returning to destiny (fuming)” (fu means return; ming refers to the nature and principle of life that the myriad things receive from Heaven).

Emperor Huizong’s Commentary:

The Dao, in its concentrated stillness and its movement, transforms and generates the myriad things. Once things possess bodily form, their inner coherence is called “form.” The bodily form preserves spirit; each has its own norm, which is called “nature” (xing). Before the myriad things had taken form, they already had their inherent distinctions, undivided and seamless, and this is called “destiny” (ming). Destiny runs through past and present and exists eternally; nature changes with the myriad bodily forms yet does not alter its essence. If people can preserve the bodily form, remove cleverness and fixed views, and return to stillness and stability, they will understand that heavenly destiny is within themselves, just as spring and summer pass and autumn and winter return in a natural cycle. To realize one’s original nature, embrace spirit, and examine oneself inwardly—this is “returning to destiny.”

Subcommentary:

What the subcommentary says is that after “abiding and moving, it generates things,” all the myriad things that possess shape, appearance, sound, and color dwell within the truth of the Dao. If one can return to quiescent stillness, one will know that heavenly destiny lies within oneself, just as spring and summer return again to autumn and winter. To realize one’s original nature, hold fast to spirit, and reflect inwardly—this is “returning to destiny.”

疏义曰:域留动之形者,貌象声色至真咸寓,孰归於寂定,则知命之在我,如彼春夏复为秋冬。体性抱神,中以自考,此之谓复命。 疏义曰:域留动之形者,貌象声色至真咸寓,孰不禀自然之成理?庄子以谓物生成理谓之形,经言物形之是已。变保神之性者,秀锺灵备,诱然皆上,孰不具固有之仪则?庄子以谓形体保神,各有仪则谓之性,《诗》言有物有则是已。有生斯有性,有性斯有形,未形之初,虽有分也,且然而已,未始有间,所谓且然无问谓之命也。有生曰性,性禀於命,命变而不穷,非终始之可期,非时数之所拘,亘古今而常存也。性与生俱,生不为贵贱无问谓之命也。有生曰性,性禀於命,命变而不穷,非终始之可期,非时数之所拘,亘古今而常存也。性与生俱,生不为贵贱加损,不为死生存亡,更万形而不易也。惟全其形生之人,存其形而不弊,抱其生焉而不伤,去知与故,循天之理,归於寂定,物不能迁矣。去智与故,若所谓不识不知、不恃智巧是也。归於寂定,若所谓寂然不动、大定持之是也。惟能如此,故知命之在我而不与物化,如彼春夏,复为秋冬,动者静,作者息,而知所止矣。盖春言天造始物,秋言人为之成,夏言人事之戒,冬言天道之复。自春祖夏,为天出而之人;自秋祖冬,为人入而之天。春夏先,秋冬后,敛其散而一之,落其华而实之道之复。自春祖夏,为天出而之人;自秋祖冬,为人入而之天。春夏先,秋冬后,敛其散而一之,落其华而实之,则芸然流形者,各复其根而不知矣。性修反德,德至同於初,盖亦如此。若然则体性抱神,中以自考,而复命之常,恶往而不暇?庄子曰:无为复朴,体性抱神。盖无为复朴,则纯素是守,故能体性抱神。《易》曰:敦复无悔,中以自考也。盖因性而厚,则外无所待,故能中以自考。夫惟如此,则淡而无为,动而以天行,其於复命也何有?经於有物混成章言:寂兮寥兮,独立而不改。终之以逝曰远,远曰反。亦以归於寂定,然后可以复命之常故也。是以先曰归根,后曰复命。
Interpretation

The Subcommentary on Meaning says: “The forms in which movement is lodged within the realm” refers to the outward appearance, image, sound, and color of the myriad things, in all of which the principle of ultimate truth is lodged. Which of them is not a principle endowed by spontaneity and thus formed? Zhuangzi holds that when things are born and their principle is completed, this is called “form”; what the scripture calls “things are formed” refers to precisely this.

“The transformation that preserves the nature of Shen” means that the numinous and refined Qi gathers in things, their spiritual nature becomes complete, and all things are guided upward. Which thing does not possess its inherent norm? Zhuangzi holds that form preserves and guards Shen (spirit), and each has its own norm; this is called “nature.” What the Book of Songs means by “there are things, and there are norms” is precisely this.

There is nature only where there is life, and form only where there is nature. Before forms had yet appeared, although the myriad things already had distinctions, these were simply so of themselves and involved no separation. This condition of “being just so, with no need to ask further” is called Ming (life-destiny). That which has life is called nature; nature is endowed by Ming. Ming changes without exhaustion, is not bound by the limits of beginning and end, is not constrained by temporal measures, and endures through past and present. Nature arises together with life; it neither increases nor decreases with noble or base status, does not change with death or life, survival or destruction, and though it passes through ten thousand forms, it does not alter.

Only one who preserves form and life can keep form from decaying and hold life from being injured. By removing cleverness and calculating mind, following Heavenly principle, and returning to stillness and calm, one cannot be moved by external things. Removing cleverness and calculating mind is what the scripture means by “not knowing and not being aware, not relying on cleverness”; returning to stillness and calm is “silent and unmoving, held by great stability.” One who can do this understands that the Ming of life lies within oneself and does not change with external things. It is like autumn and winter following spring and summer: what moves returns to stillness, what acts returns to rest, and one knows where to stop.

Spring is the Way of Heaven creating the myriad things; autumn is human accomplishment; summer is human vigilance; winter is the return of the Way of Heaven. From spring to summer, the Way of Heaven manifests and descends into the human realm; from autumn to winter, humans return to Heaven. Spring and summer come first; autumn and winter follow. Gather what is scattered and bring it to unity; strip away surface splendor and make it solid. Then the myriad things, bustling and flowing, each return to their root without knowing it. Cultivating nature and returning to De, with De reaching identity with the original beginning—this is probably what it means.

Thus one can embody and guard one’s nature, embrace and guard Shen (spirit), examine oneself inwardly, and return to the constant way of Ming—what is there that cannot be done? Zhuangzi says, “Through Wuwei one returns to uncarved simplicity.” To embody and guard nature and to embrace and guard spirit: by Wuwei and returning to simplicity, one can preserve pure truth and plainness, and therefore can embody nature and embrace spirit. The Yijing says, “A sincere return brings no regret.” This is inward self-examination. Because one is sincere and solid by nature, outwardly there is nothing on which to rely; thus one can inwardly examine and verify oneself. If one can do this, one is plain and desireless, acts through Wuwei, and in movement follows the Way of Heaven; then what difficulty is there in returning to Ming?

The scriptural chapter “There Is Something Undifferentiated and Complete” says: “Silent and empty! It stands alone and does not change.” Its ultimate movement going far is called “far”; going far and then returning is called “return.” This too means that one must return to stillness and calm before one can return to the constant way of Ming. Therefore it first speaks of “returning to the root” and only afterward of “returning to Ming.”

复命曰常, 徽宗注曰:常者,对变之词。复命则万变不能迁,无间无歇,与道为一,以挈天地,以袭气母。 疏义曰:即经纬以观常。复命则万变不能迁,无间无歇,与道为一,以挈天地,以袭气母。 疏义曰:即经纬以观常与变之理,经有一定之体,故为常;而纬则错综往来,故为变。常之与变,犹经之与纬,则常者对变之辞也。然成而不变,物所谓常。变化无穷,道所谓常。物所谓常,以常故弊。道所谓常,以变故常。惟复命则自本自根,自古以固存,波之非恶,湛之非美,虽历万变於不可为量数之中,曾无以易其真常信,所谓万变不能迁也。若然则其神无却,物奚自入焉?是谓无间。不以顷久推移,未尝止也,是谓无歇。无间无歇,与道为一,则亘古亘今,独立不改,如稀韦氏得之以挈天地,相为长久,如伏羲氏得之以袭气母,相为无穷。其为常也,无以易此。 知常曰明。 徽宗注曰:知道之常,不为物迁,故六彻相因,足以以袭气母,相为无穷。其为常也,无以易此。 知常曰明。 徽宗注曰:知道之常,不为物迁,故六彻相因,足以鉴天地,足以照万物。
Interpretation

Returning to Destiny Is Called the Constant

“Return” means to return, to revert. “Destiny” refers to the nature endowed in all things, the original state of a thing. To be able to return to this source is called the “Constant,” that is, what is enduring and unchanging.

Huizong’s Commentary: The Constant is a concept opposed to “change.” If one can return to one’s original nature, one will not be shaken by the myriad changes. It is uninterrupted and ceaseless, and is united with the Dao (the Way, the fundamental principle of all things); therefore it can lift up Heaven and Earth and govern the mother of Qi (the source of primal Qi, namely the Dao).

Explication: To understand the Constant, one may borrow the warp and weft of weaving. The warp threads are arranged lengthwise and have a fixed form, so they represent the Constant; the weft threads pass crosswise and interweave back and forth, so they represent change. The relation between the Constant and change is like that between warp and weft: the Constant is precisely spoken of in contrast to change.

The “constant” upheld by things in the world is fixed and immobile, and what is fixed is prone to decay. The “constant” spoken of by the Dao, however, endures precisely because it can move along with change. Only by returning to one’s original nature can one be rooted in oneself and exist from antiquity. When water is stirred into waves, this is not a bad thing; when water is still and clear, this is not necessarily good. Even after undergoing countless changes, the nature of true constancy remains unchanged—this is “the myriad changes cannot move it.”

When the spirit has no gap or fissure, external things have no way to intrude; this is called “without interval.” Not changing with the passage of time and never stopping is called “without cessation.” Without interval and without cessation, one is united with the Dao, and thus one connects past and present and stands alone without changing. It is said that Xiwei (a ruler of remote antiquity), having obtained this Dao, could lift up Heaven and Earth, and Fuxi (a ruler of remote antiquity), having obtained this Dao, could govern the mother of Qi; thus they could endure long and without end. What is called the Constant is that which nothing can replace.

Knowing the Constant Is Called Illumination

Huizong’s Commentary: To understand the constancy of the Dao and not be shifted by external things means that the clarity of the six sense faculties (eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind) in the heart becomes mutually penetrating, sufficient to illumine Heaven and Earth and to illuminate the myriad things. This is “illumination.”

疏义曰:一而不变,静之至也。道之常不与物迁者,以静而已。惟静也,故不与动俱驰。於万物并作也,以观其复;於物之芸芸也,知归其根。观复而归根,则其静也,万物莫足以倾之矣。是以六彻相因,足以鉴天地,足以照万物。盖彻者,不为物所壅之谓。目不为色所壅,故见晓而为明;耳不为声所壅,故听莹而为聪;鼻之於臭,彻而为颤;口之於味,彻而为甘;以至心不弊於思虑,彻而为知;知不昧於物理,彻而为德,是所谓六彻相因者。自目至於知,六者相因不壅於味,彻而为甘;以至心不弊於思虑,彻而为知;知不昧於物理,彻而为德,是所谓六彻相因者。自目至於知,六者相因不壅,以虚一而静故也。虚则静,静则明,明则精神四达并流,无所不极。上际於天,下蟠於地,化育万物,不可为象。天地虽大,於此乎可观;万物虽多,於此乎可形。静乎,天地之镒也,万物之照也,非知常者未易臻此。 不知常,妄作,凶。 徽宗注曰:圣人知道之常,故作则契理,每与吉会。不知常者,随物转徙,触涂自患,故妄见美恶,以与道违,妄生是非,以与道异,且不足以固其命,故凶。《易》曰:复则不妄,迷而不知复。兹妄也已。
Interpretation

The body of Dao remains one and the same from beginning to end and does not change with external things; this is stillness taken to its utmost. The constancy of Dao, its not changing with the ten thousand things, is simply because it is pure, still, and Wuwei (non-action). Precisely because it is pure and still, it does not run along with the ten thousand things in their turmoil. When the ten thousand things grow and operate together, one must be able to observe the principle of their cyclical return; when the ten thousand things are manifold and teeming, one must be able to awaken to how each returns to its root. Contemplating the return and recurrence of the ten thousand things and understanding that all things return to their root, this stillness and stability will not be shaken by any external thing.

Thus, when the Six Penetrations—the state in which the six links of perception and cognition (eye, ear, nose, mouth, mind, and knowing) interpenetrate and rely on one another—mutually depend on one another, they are sufficient to mirror Heaven and Earth and to reflect the ten thousand things. What is called “penetration” means not being obstructed by external things. The eye is not obscured by colors, so it sees clearly and brightly; the ear is not disturbed by sounds, so it hears distinctly and keenly; when the nose is unobstructed with respect to odors, it can distinguish the fragrant from the foul; when the mouth is unobstructed with respect to flavors, it can taste the sweet and delicious; when the mind is not troubled by thoughts, its penetration becomes wisdom; when wisdom is not clouded by the principles of things, its penetration becomes De (Virtue/Power). This is what is meant by the mutual dependence of the Six Penetrations. From the eye to knowing, these six rely on one another without obstruction because the mind is empty and undivided, pure, still, and unmoving. When the mind is empty, it can be pure and still; when it is pure and still, it can be clear and lucid; when it is clear and lucid, the spirit (Shen) penetrates in all directions and flows through without obstruction, and there is nowhere it does not reach. Above, it can reach the heavenly realm; below, it can coil over the earth; it transforms and nurtures the ten thousand things, yet cannot be defined by any concrete form. Though Heaven and Earth are vast, they can be contemplated herein; though the ten thousand things are many, they can be manifested herein. Stillness! It is the pivot of Heaven and Earth and the bright mirror of the ten thousand things. Unless one understands the constant Dao, it is difficult to attain this state.

One who does not know the constant Dao and acts recklessly will bring misfortune upon himself.

Emperor Huizong of Song (an emperor of the Northern Song; here his commentary on the scripture) says: The sage understands the constancy of Dao, so his actions conform to norms and accord with the nature of things, and he constantly encounters auspiciousness. One who does not know constancy shifts and moves with external things; whatever he touches, he brings vexation upon himself; thus he recklessly judges beauty and ugliness and turns away from Dao; he recklessly generates right and wrong and goes against Dao. This is not enough to stabilize one’s own nature and life, and so it invites misfortune. The Yijing says: “Returning, one is without recklessness; to be deluded and not know to return—this is indeed recklessness.” This is precisely the principle being stated.

疏义曰:心与道合,则作无非真;心与道离,则动无非妄。圣人者,道之极也,所以知道之常而不与物迁。故作则契理,无适而非真,每心与道合,则作无非真;心与道离,则动无非妄。圣人者,道之极也,所以知道之常而不与物迁。故作则契理,无适而非真,每与吉会,无往而不动,动必迪吉,履必考祥,作德心逸曰休,作善而降之百祥也。不知常者,作无非妄,去道愈远,与接为构,随物转徙,曰以心斗,触涂生患,故妄见美恶。牵於好恶之私,而不知齐美恶於一理,故与道违,妄生是非。惑於毁誉之伪,而不知化是非於两忘,故与道异。盖道不可须臾离,既与道违,又与道异,则驰其形性,寇於阴阳,且不足以固其命,祸莫大焉,不可须臾离,既与道违,又与道异,则驰其形性,寇於阴阳,且不足以固其命,祸莫大焉,故凶。《易》於《序卦言》:复则不妄。盖复小而辨於物,是为无妄。无妄者,天之命,万物之所听也。故其《象》言:天下雷行,物与无妄。无妄则物得其性矣。至於迷而不复,则失性而穷,不能生生,兹妄也已。 知常容, 徽宗注曰:知常则不藏是非美恶,故无所不容。
Interpretation

Vernacular Interpretation

When the mind is in accord with the Dao (the Way), there is nothing one does that is not true; when the mind turns away from the Dao, every action is delusive. The sage is the fullest embodiment of the Dao: because he understands the constant principle of the Dao, he does not change along with external things. Therefore his actions accord with the nature of things; wherever he goes is real, his movements inevitably tend toward auspiciousness, and his deeds inevitably conform to blessings and good fortune. When the will is settled and De (Virtue/Power) is ample, this is called “xiu” (the good, beautiful, and peaceful). When one does good, various blessings and auspicious omens descend.

Those who do not understand “constancy” (the constant principle of the Dao) act delusively and drift farther and farther from the Dao. When they come into contact with external things, they are pulled along by them and shift with them; this is called “using the mind to contend” (contending with mental cleverness). As soon as contact occurs, misfortune arises, and so they always perceive beauty and ugliness incorrectly. Constrained by personal likes and dislikes, they do not understand how to refer beauty and ugliness to the same principle; thus they oppose the Dao and recklessly generate right and wrong. Deluded by the falseness of blame and praise, they do not understand how to forget both right and wrong; thus they diverge from the Dao.

The Dao cannot be departed from even for a moment. Once one both opposes the Dao and diverges from it, one dissipates one’s own physical form and original nature, is invaded and disturbed by the Qi (vital energy) of Yin-Yang, and may even be unable to preserve one’s lifespan. No misfortune is greater than this; hence it is called “misfortune.”

The Xugua Zhuan (Commentary on the Sequence of Hexagrams) of the Yijing says: “Returning, then one is not delusive.” The Return hexagram is the first arising of subtle yang Qi; it can discern the source of things—this is Wu Wang (No Falseness). Wu Wang is the command of Heaven, to which the myriad things submit. Therefore the Xiang commentary on the Wu Wang hexagram says: “Thunder moves beneath heaven; things share in Wu Wang.” The myriad things thereby obtain their own natures. As for going astray and being unable to return, one then loses one’s original nature and falls into hardship, unable to generate and regenerate ceaselessly—this is delusion.

“Knowing Constancy, One Is All-Embracing”

This line comes from chapter 16 of the Daodejing: “Knowing constancy, one can be all-embracing; being all-embracing, one can be impartial; being impartial, one can be universal; being universal, one can be Heaven; being Heaven, one can be Dao; being Dao, one can be long-lasting, and to the end of one’s days will not be in danger.” It means: one who understands the constant Dao can embrace all things; embracing all things, one can be impartial and selfless; being impartial, one can be complete and universal; being complete and universal, one accords with the Way of Heaven; according with the Way of Heaven, one accords with the Dao; according with the Dao, one can endure long, and to the end of one’s life will not encounter danger.

Huizong’s Commentary (Zhao Ji, Emperor Huizong of the Northern Song, on the Daode Zhenjing)

“Knowing constancy, one does not store right and wrong, beauty and ugliness in the mind; therefore there is nothing one does not embrace.” It means: one who understands the constant Dao does not keep right and wrong, beauty and ugliness in the mind, and therefore there is nothing he cannot embrace.

疏义曰:道之真常,一而已矣。体道之一,以观天下,则纷错万殊,同为至妙,孰有是非美恶之辨哉?盖排非提是,则生於不容。 疏义曰:道之真常,一而已矣。体道之一,以观天下,则纷错万殊,同为至妙,孰有是非美恶之辨哉?盖排非提是,则生於有执;好美恶恶,则索于自徇。至人去有执之累而忘是非,冥自徇之私而齐美恶,兹无他,知常而已。知常则虚己游世,达乎无疵,是非美恶不藏於心,然后能广乎无不容矣。圣人之治虚其心者,以此。 容乃公, 徽宗注曰:无容心焉,则不独亲其亲,不独子其子,何私之有? 疏义曰:因物有见,则私於自徇。冥道无心,则公於大同。圣人家天下而兼覆,子兆民而均育,无容心焉,故不独亲其亲而爱无不至,不独子其子而慈无不广,又何私之有?即天地观之,天无私覆,地无私载,凡囿乎两间,未始逃於覆载。而均育,无容心焉,故不独亲其亲而爱无不至,不独子其子而慈无不广,又何私之有?即天地观之,天无私覆,地无私载,凡囿乎两间,未始逃於覆载。容乃公者,盖亦如之,故观天地则见圣人。 公乃王, 徽宗注曰:大道之行也,天下为公,故天下乐推而不厌。
Interpretation

The true constancy of Dao (the Way) is originally singular. Once one has realized this “One” and then looks upon the myriad things under Heaven, although they are diverse, chaotic, and utterly different, they all equally return to the utmost wondrous realm—where then are the distinctions of right and wrong, beauty and ugliness? It is precisely by rejecting “wrong” and exalting “right” that opposition and incompatibility arise; it is by loving beauty and loathing ugliness that people become trapped within the limits of self-seeking.

The Perfected Person (one of the highest cultivation who has already attained the Dao) has removed the burdens of attachment and forgotten right and wrong; he has erased selfish thoughts and brought beauty and ugliness back to unity. There is no other reason for this than that he understands the Constant (the constant principle of Dao). Understanding the Constant, he can dwell with an empty mind and comply with the affairs of the world without obstruction; right and wrong, beauty and ugliness no longer remain in his mind, and only then can he embrace all things. When the sage governs the world and makes his mind empty, it is precisely in accordance with this that he acts.

Of the phrase “Being all-embracing, one becomes impartial,” Emperor Huizong (Song Emperor Huizong, author of the commentary cited in this book) comments: When the mind holds no deliberate partiality, one will not be close only to one’s own kin or tender only to one’s own children—how then could selfishness remain?

The Subcommentary explains: Because contact with external things gives rise to views, one falls into selfish pursuit; when one accords with Dao and the mind holds no preconceptions, one becomes greatly unified with the world and free of self. The sage regards all under Heaven as one family, shelters and nurtures the myriad people, and looks upon the common people as his children. Because he has no mind of partiality, he does not merely love his own kin, and his loving heart reaches everywhere; he does not merely treat his own children as children, and his compassionate heart extends everywhere—how then could there be selfishness? Looking at Heaven and Earth, Heaven covers the myriad things without selfishness, Earth bears the myriad things without selfishness, and whatever lies between Heaven and Earth cannot escape their covering and support. The sage’s all-embracing selflessness is likewise so; therefore, by observing Heaven and Earth, one may see the likeness of the sage.

Of the phrase “Being impartial, one becomes kingly,” Huizong comments: When the great Dao is put into practice, all under Heaven is held in common, and so all under Heaven gladly support him without growing weary. (“Kingly” [wang] refers to a ruler who can match all under Heaven with an impartial mind and to whom all under Heaven turn.)

疏义曰:道者为之公,人之所共由,此《记礼》者载仲尼之言,所以称大道之行,天下为公。治之要在知道,而圣道为群心之用。圣人以道出治天下,以心受道,是以亲而慕之,怀而归之,发於心悦诚服,至於悠久不息,天下乐推而不戢矣。《易》所谓百姓与能,此之谓也。 王乃天,天乃道。 徽宗注曰:通天地人而位乎天地之中者,王也。一而大在上而无不覆者,天也。天地人莫不由之者,道也。尽人则同乎天,体天则同乎道。
Interpretation

The sub-commentary says: The Dao is the common standard followed by all under Heaven. The Liji (Book of Rites), a Confucian classic, records the words of Zhongni (Confucius), saying that when the Great Dao was put into practice, all under Heaven was held in common. From this it is clear that the key to governing all under Heaven lies in understanding the Dao, and that the sage’s Dao is what the hearts of the multitude rely upon. The sage governs all under Heaven by the Dao and receives the Dao in his heart; therefore the people draw near to him, look up to him, and attach themselves to him. They rejoice inwardly and sincerely believe in him, and this does not fade over time. All under Heaven gladly uphold him and are unwilling to cast him aside. What the Yi (Zhouyi) calls “the common people join with his capacity” refers precisely to this principle.

“‘The king is Heaven; Heaven is Dao.’ This means: one who can penetrate the Three Powers—Heaven, Earth, and Humanity—and stand between Heaven and Earth is the king; that which is perfectly one and vast, occupies the highest place, and covers all things is Heaven; that which Heaven, Earth, and Humanity all follow is the Dao. One who can fully develop human nature becomes the same as Heaven; one who can realize the principle of Heaven becomes the same as the Dao.”

疏义大在上而无不覆者,天也。天地人莫不由之者,道也。尽人则同乎天,体天则同乎道。 疏义曰:天地设位,圣人成能,域中四大,王处一焉。此通天地人而位乎天地之中者,王也。一者未离於有数,而为数之宗;大者未离有体,而为体之极。轻清在上,兼覆广容,此一而大在上而无不覆者,天也。天得之而职气覆,地得之而职形载,圣得之而职教化,此天地人莫不由之者,道也。王者,人道之极。能尽人道,则与天通,岂非尽人则同乎天欤?庄子曰:王者天道。则王乃天可知也。天者,道之大原。能以天为宗,则与道为一,岂非体天则同乎道欤?经曰:天法道。则天乃道可知也。《诗》之《大雅》於无声无臭而曰仪刑文王,盖文王所为,实与天合,欲自天之道,则亦仪刑文王而欤?经曰:天法道。则天乃道可知也。《诗》之《大雅》於无声无臭而曰仪刑文王,盖文王所为,实与天合,欲自天之道,则亦仪刑文王而已。是尽人则同乎天也。又於不识不知而曰顺帝之则,盖妙道之行,实同乎天,欲探道之妙,则亦顺帝之则而已。是体天则同乎道也。周家之盛,圣作明迷,相守一道,歌於声诗,所以为三代之显,王者每得乎此。 道乃久,没身不殆。 徽宗注曰:道者万世无弊,庶物得之者昌,关百圣而不穷,蔽天地而不息,故没身不殆。殆近凶,几近吉,不殆则无妄作之凶,非知常者无与。
Interpretation

Heaven and Earth each abide in their places, and the sage brings their functions to completion. Among the Three Powers—Heaven, Earth, and Humanity—the one who can penetrate all three and dwell in the exact center of Heaven and Earth is the king. “One” has not yet departed from the numbered (the myriad things that possess quantity), yet it is the root of all numbers. “Great” has not yet departed from corporeal form, yet it is the utmost of form. The light and pure qi (vital energy) dwells above, covering all things and broadly containing all things; that which dwells above and covers all without exception is Heaven. Heaven attains the Dao (the Way) and presides over qi transformation, sheltering and nurturing; Earth attains the Dao and presides over form and substance, bearing all things; the sage attains the Dao and presides over teaching and transformation. What Heaven, Earth, and Humanity all follow without exception is the Dao (the fundamental principle governing the movement of all things in the cosmos).

The king is the utmost of the human way. If one can fully fulfill the human way, one can communicate with Heaven—is this not to say that fulfilling the human way is identical with Heaven? Zhuangzi says, “The king is the heavenly Dao”; from this we know that the king is Heaven. Heaven is the fundamental source of the Dao; if one can take Heaven as one’s ancestral source, one becomes one with the Dao—is this not to say that realizing the heavenly Dao is identical with the Dao? Laozi says, “Heaven models itself on the Dao”; from this we know that Heaven is the Dao. The Greater Odes in the Book of Songs praises King Wen as “without sound, without smell” (his virtue is mysterious and traceless), yet it still says, “Take King Wen as your model” (take King Wen as the standard). What King Wen did was in fact in accord with Heaven; if one wishes to emulate the heavenly Dao, then emulating King Wen is sufficient—this is what it means to say that fulfilling the human way is identical with Heaven. It also says, “Without knowing, without recognizing, they follow the rule of the Lord on High (Shangdi)” (unknowingly following the rule of the Lord on High); this means that the operation of the wondrous Dao is in fact identical with Heaven. If one wishes to investigate the mystery of the Dao, then following the rule of the Lord on High is sufficient—this is what it means to say that realizing Heaven is identical with the Dao.

The flourishing of the Zhou dynasty lay in the sage using wise teaching to guide those who were deluded; people jointly upheld the same great Dao and sang it in poetry. Thus it became the most illustrious dynasty among the three dynasties of Xia, Shang, and Zhou, and kings of later ages often took it as a mirror.

“The Dao is enduring; to the end of one’s days, one is not in danger.”

Huizong’s commentary says: The Dao causes the ten thousand ages to have no decline or decay; the myriad things that attain it can flourish; it penetrates a hundred sages without being exhausted and shelters Heaven and Earth without ceasing. Therefore it says, “To the end of one’s days, one is not in danger.” “Danger” is close to misfortune; “incipience” is close to good fortune. If one does not fall into peril, then there will be no misfortune brought about by reckless action. This is something only one who comprehends the constant Dao can accomplish.

疏义曰:泽及万世,长於上古者,道之久也,故万世无弊。所谓会古以固存者,是以
Interpretation

The memorial text says: grace extends throughout ten thousand generations and endures even longer than remote antiquity. This is because the Dao itself—the fundamental cosmic order as understood in Daoism—is enduring, and therefore it does not decay even after passing through ten thousand generations. What is called “uniting with the ancient Dao in order to seek lasting existence” is precisely what enables it to bring all things to completion in a thorough and accommodating way, leaving nothing out.

(“Qucheng,” “accomplishing through accommodation,” comes from the “Xici Shang” section of the Zhouyi: “It accomplishes all things through accommodation and leaves nothing behind,” meaning to bring all things to completion in a thorough and accommodating manner without omitting anything.)

曲成

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 1 Vol. 3 →