中文 · EN

《道德真经集义(危大有)》Vol. 4

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 Vol. 4 / 6 25,000 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真经集义(危大有)》 Vol. 4 (Taixuan 太玄部, 6 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 17 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真经集义(危大有)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

而难治,故曰不足以取天下。 第四十九章 圣人无常心,以百姓心为心。 吕氏曰:天本无心○李氏曰:苟或妄有作为,则民乱而难治,故曰不足以取天下。 第四十九章 圣人无常心,以百姓心为心。 吕氏曰:天本无心於物,因物见天之心,是以虚而能受,静而能应,如鉴对形,以彼妍丑,如谷应声,以彼巨细,初无他心,何常心之有。苟卿曰:天下无二道,圣人无两心,是以譬诸己焉。渊默寂淡,能应能定,不将不迎,和其光,同其尘,大齐物我,而未尝异於物,故曰圣人无常心,以百姓心为心。○李氏曰:上章云无事取天下,故次之以圣人无常心,所谓无常心者,随机应变,不逆民物之情,故百姓遵圣人之言,行圣人之行,从圣人之化,天下同一心也。○何氏曰:圣人心若太虚,何常之有,其常心者,天下之心而已。○政和注:圣人之心虚而能受,静而能应,如镜对影,以彼妍丑,如谷,何常之有,其常心者,天下之心而已。○政和注:圣人之心虚而能受,静而能应,如镜对影,以彼妍丑,如谷应声,以彼巨细,何常之有。 善者吾善之,不善者吾亦善之,德善。信者吾信之,不信者吾亦信之,德信。
Interpretation

At the end of the commentary on Chapter 48 it says: If a ruler recklessly engages in self-assertive action, the people will become disorderly and difficult to govern; therefore it says, “Such a one is not sufficient to win the world.”

Chapter 49

The sage has no fixed, unchanging private mind, but takes the mind of the people as his own mind.

Master Lü (a Song-dynasty scholar who annotated the Laozi) says: Heaven originally has no private mind toward the myriad things. It manifests its will in accordance with the conditions of the myriad things; thus, being empty and still, it can encompass, and being settled, it can respond. Like a mirror reflecting forms, it reflects beauty and ugliness as they are; like a valley echoing sounds, it echoes great and small alike. Originally there is no private mind at all—how could one speak of a fixed mind? Xunzi says: “The world does not have two Daos (Ways), and the sage does not have two minds; therefore he can infer others from himself.” The sage is profoundly deep and still, placid and Wuwei (non-action); he can accord with things and can also settle them, neither pandering nor rejecting. He tempers his own light and blends with the dust of the world, making things and self equal and one, yet does not stand in opposition to the myriad things. Therefore it says, “The sage has no constant mind; he takes the mind of the people as his mind.”

Li (a commentator) says: The preceding chapter speaks of “winning the world through no affairs,” and therefore this chapter follows with “The sage has no constant mind.” What is called having no constant mind is responding according to circumstances and not going against the true conditions of the people and the myriad things. Thus the people follow the sage’s words and teachings, emulate the sage’s conduct, and accept the sage’s transforming instruction; then all under heaven share one mind and one virtue.

He (a commentator) says: The sage’s mind is like the vast, empty Great Void—where could there be a fixed mind? What is called the “constant mind” is simply the mind of the people under heaven.

The Zhenghe Commentary (a commentary from the Zhenghe era of Emperor Huizong of Song) says: The sage’s mind is empty and able to receive, still and able to respond; like a mirror reflecting things, whether beautiful or ugly, it reflects them as they are; like a valley echoing sounds, whether great or small, it responds accordingly. Therefore the sage has no fixed mind.

The Scripture Continues

Good people, I treat with goodness; people who are not good, I also treat with goodness—this is the goodness of De (Virtue/Power). Trustworthy people, I trust; people who are not trustworthy, I also trust—this is the trust of De.

吕氏曰:夫善否相非,诞信相讥,善与不善,信与不信,世俗之情,自为同异耳。故有好善之心者,圣人不违其性,辅之以上善,使必成其善。苟有不善者,亦因以善待之,善不善在彼,而吾所以善之者,未尝渝也。百行无非善,而天下莫不服其化使必成其善。苟有不善者,亦因以善待之,善不善在彼,而吾所以善之者,未尝渝也。百行无非善,而天下莫不服其化,德之厚矣。故有好信之诚者,圣人不夺其志,辅之以大信,使必成其信。苟有不诚之心者,亦因以信待之,而吾所以信之者,未尝变也。万情无非信,而百姓确然无不信,德之至矣。夫至人者是非一政,真伪两忘,美亦善之,恶亦善之,常善救物而无弃物,可亦信之,否亦信之,常善救人而无弃人是也。○何氏曰:大凡善者吾善之,不善者未必善,信者吾信之,不信者未必信,此常人之心也,未是德善德信事也。圣人德与天地参,天地无私覆载,日月容光必照,圣心浑乎以物我为一也,故能善人之不善,信人所不信,彼善否相非,诞信相讥,而吾一以自然之道待之,《书》曰:简厥修,亦简其或不修,进厥良,以率其或不良,何善我为一也,故能善人之不善,信人所不信,彼善否相非,诞信相讥,而吾一以自然之道待之,《书》曰:简厥修,亦简其或不修,进厥良,以率其或不良,何善何否。语曰:不逆诈,不亿不信,何信何诞。有孚显若,下观而化,此也。《庄子》:其好之也一,其弗好之也一,其一也一,其不一也一,其一与天为徒,其不一与人为徒,此也。○林氏曰:善不善在彼,而我常以善待之,初无分别之心。子曰:苟志於化矣,无恶也。与此伺。信不信在彼,而我常以信待之,初无疑间之心。子曰:不亿不信,亦此意也。其曰吾亦善之,吾亦信之者化矣,无恶也。与此伺。信不信在彼,而我常以信待之,初无疑间之心。子曰:不亿不信,亦此意也。其曰吾亦善之,吾亦信之者,非以其不善为善,不信为信也,但应之以无心耳。
Interpretation

Master Lü says: People in the world accuse one another of right and wrong, good and bad, and mock one another for delusion and sincerity. [Distinctions between] good and not-good, trustworthy and untrustworthy all arise from worldly feelings, each person distinguishing sameness and difference according to their own likes and dislikes. Therefore, toward those whose hearts incline to goodness, the sage follows their nature and assists them with the highest way of goodness, enabling them surely to accomplish good conduct. Even when meeting those who are not good, the sage still treats them with goodness. Whether others are good or not good depends on themselves, but the heart with which the sage treats people with goodness never changes. The various virtues in the world are all goodness; no one in the world fails to be moved and won over by this transformation—this is the profundity of De (Virtue/Power).

Likewise, toward those whose hearts hold sincerity, the sage does not wrest away their resolve but assists them with great trust, enabling them surely to fulfill trustworthiness. Toward those who are not sincere, the sage still treats them with trust, and the heart with which he trusts others never changes. Among the myriad dispositions in the world, there is nothing that cannot be trusted; thus the common people all trust and submit with peace of mind—this is the utmost height of De. The Perfected Person (one who has reached the highest level in cultivating the Dao [the Way]) regards right and wrong with equal impartiality and forgets the distinction between true and false. Whether good or bad, he treats them with goodness; he constantly uses goodness to succor the myriad things, abandoning no thing. Whether trustworthy or untrustworthy, he trusts them; he constantly uses goodness to rescue the multitude, abandoning no person. This is precisely the state being described.

Master He says: Ordinary people only treat the good with goodness and do not consider the not-good good; they only trust the trustworthy and do not trust the untrustworthy. This is the mind of ordinary people, not the practice of a person of De who is good to goodness and trusts trustworthiness. The De of the sage stands equal with Heaven and Earth. Heaven and Earth cover and support all things without partiality; the light of sun and moon shines everywhere. The sage’s mind is undifferentiated and regards things and self as one body; therefore he can treat the not-good with goodness and trust those whom others do not trust. Those people mutually condemn one another’s good and bad and mock one another’s falsehood and sincerity, but I treat them all according to the natural Dao. The Book of Documents says: “Select those who are cultivated, and also select those who are not yet cultivated; advance the good to lead those who are not good.” It also says, “What is good, what is not?”—this is exactly the meaning. The ancients said, “Do not anticipate deceit, do not guess at untrustworthiness,” and also, “What is trustworthy, what is false?” What the Yi Jing, in the Guan hexagram, calls “possessing sincerity and dignity, those below observe and are transformed” is also this principle. Zhuangzi says: “That he likes it is one; that he does not like it is one. His oneness is one; his not-oneness is one. His oneness is a companion of Heaven; his not-oneness is a companion of humanity.” This too is the same meaning.

Master Lin says: Good and not-good lie with the other person, while I always treat them with goodness, fundamentally having no discriminating mind. Confucius said, “If one sets one’s will on humaneness, there will be no evil.” This is also the meaning. Trustworthiness and untrustworthiness lie with the other, while I always treat them with trust, fundamentally having no doubting mind. Confucius’s saying “do not guess at untrustworthiness” has the same meaning. The scriptural text says, “I too am good to them; I too trust them.” This does not mean taking the not-good as good or the untrustworthy as trustworthy; it is simply responding in a state of no-mind.

圣人之在天下,惵惵为天下浑其心,百姓皆注其耳目,圣人皆孩之。 吕氏曰:圣人体道合变,毋意毋必毋固毋我,旁礴万物,浑其心而同其尘,顺其性而同其化,未始自为取含,天下一心,浑浑然无所分别,无善无恶,无信无伪,真一不二,待之以道,故曰圣人之在天下,蝶蝶为天下浑其心。○林氏曰:惵惵者,不自安之意,圣人无自矜自足之心,,故曰圣人之在天下,蝶蝶为天下浑其心。○林氏曰:惵惵者,不自安之意,圣人无自矜自足之心,故常有不自安之意。浑其心者,浑然而不露圭角,此心浑然所以无善不善,信不信之分也。注其耳目者,人皆注其视听於圣人,而圣人皆以婴儿待之,故曰皆孩之。此无弃人之意也。 第五十章 出生入死。
Interpretation

Vernacular Explanation of the Scriptural Text

The sage, placed in the midst of the world, cautiously and carefully harmonizes his mind on behalf of the people of the world, so that his state of mind becomes fused and undifferentiated, making no distinction between self and other. The common people all focus their ears and eyes—their attention—upon the sage, and the sage treats them as one would treat infants, with equal regard, abandoning no one.

The commentator Mr. Lü (the annotator surnamed Lü) explains: The sage realizes the Great Dao, accords with transformation, and has no subjective intentions, obsessions, rigidity, or self-centered views. He comes into contact with the myriad things without partial attachment, follows the nature of the myriad things, and changes together with them. The minds of the people of the world return to unity, fused without discrimination; there is no so-called good or evil, no so-called true or false. He always preserves pure oneness and treats the world by means of the Dao.

The commentator Mr. Lin (the annotator surnamed Lin) says: “Anxious and unsettled” describes a state of not being content with self-satisfaction. The sage does not boast or consider himself sufficient, and therefore constantly harbors an unsettled mind. “Fusing his mind” means being undifferentiated and not revealing any sharp edges; his mental state is complete and harmonious, and therefore he does not distinguish between good and not good, trustworthy and untrustworthy. “Directing one’s ears and eyes” means that people concentrate their seeing and hearing upon the sage; the sage treats them with an infant-like mentality, and so it says “all are treated as children.” This shows the sage’s intention to abandon no one.

Chapter Fifty: From Birth to Death

This sentence comes from Chapter Fifty of the Laozi. Literally, it means moving from birth toward death, and it refers to the transition between life and death. The entire chapter unfolds around the preservation or loss of life and the nourishing of life, and this sentence is the starting point of the whole chapter.

吕氏曰:道生一炁,炁变而有形,形变而有生,生者炁之聚,万物之出於机者也。生变而有死,死者炁之散,万物之入於机者也。有形则复於无形:道生一炁,炁变而有形,形变而有生,生者炁之聚,万物之出於机者也。生变而有死,死者炁之散,万物之入於机者也。有形则复於无形,有生则复於无生,物有死生,性无加损,盖生者造物之所始,死者阴阳之所变,此乃有卒未离乎域中者也。离乎域中者,其出不欣,其入不讵,出生入死,出死入生,无可无不可,修炼之士,以清阳而无质者为生炁,以浊阴而凝滓者为死炁。人者禀冲和之炁,非浊非清,而生也入清阳而出阴浊,阳纯则为上仙,入阴滓 而出清阳,阴纯则为下鬼。若乃服六气,养元精,吸沆瀣,皆天气感化,无形无上仙,入阴滓
Interpretation

Master Lü (the commentator) says: The Dao (the Way), the source of the universe, transforms and brings forth Qi (vital energy); Qi changes and becomes things with form; form changes and then there is life. “Birth” is the gathering of Qi: the myriad things come forth from this, all issuing from this mechanism of transformation. Life changes again, and then there is death. “Death” is the dispersal of Qi: the myriad things enter through this, all returning to this mechanism of transformation. Once there is form, there is again a return to formlessness; once there is life, there is again a return to no-birth.

The myriad things have birth and death, but their original nature neither increases nor decreases. Birth is the starting point of the transformation that produces the myriad things; death is the result of Yin-Yang change. Both still lie within Heaven and Earth (within the domain). If one can transcend the domain, then one is not delighted at birth and not afraid at entering death; coming forth from birth and entering death, coming forth from death and entering life, there is no “acceptable” and no “unacceptable.”

Cultivators call the clear, yang, and immaterial Qi “life Qi,” and the turbid, yin, and stagnant Qi “death Qi.” Humans receive the harmonious Qi of balance (chonghe), which is neither turbid nor clear. At birth, people inhale clear yang and exhale yin turbidity; when yang Qi is pure, one becomes an upper immortal; if one inhales yin dregs and exhales clear yang, when yin Qi is pure, one falls to become a lower ghost. As for ingesting the six Qi (the six primal energies between Heaven and Earth), nourishing the original Jing (essence), and drinking the clear dew of night (hangxie), these all borrow the Qi of Heaven and Earth to transform oneself. If one cannot reach the realm of formlessness, one cannot become an upper immortal; instead, one easily becomes stained by yin dregs.

而出清阳,阴纯则为下鬼。若乃服六气,养元精,吸沆瀣,皆天气感化,无形无质,故能通神明而寿齐二景,此之谓出死入生。世之人食谷实,嗜五味,有形有质,盗其真炁,散其清阳,入其阴滓,此之谓出生入死。○吴氏曰:出则生,入则死,出谓自无而见於有,入谓自有而归於无,《庄子》万物皆出於机,入於机,又曰:其出不忻,其入不讵,又曰:有乎出,有乎入,皆以出为生,入为死。○林氏曰:出生入死,此四字一章之纲领也。出则为生,入则为死,出则超然而脱离之也。入则迷而自汨没也。能入而出者,惟有道者则然。 生之徒,十有三。。出则为生,入则为死,出则超然而脱离之也。入则迷而自汨没也。能入而出者,惟有道者则然。 生之徒,十有三。死之徒,十有三。人之生,动之死地,亦十有三。夫何故?以其生生之厚。
Interpretation

Whether a person can attain long life depends crucially on whether one complies with nature and preserves and nourishes the root.

The scripture says that those who cultivate the Dao ingest the Six Qi (the pure and harmonious qi of heaven and earth), nurture original Jing (the pre-heaven essence, the fundamental vital essence of the human body), and absorb hangxie (the clear dew of midnight, regarded by Daoists as a celestial drink). All of these receive the qi of heaven and earth in order to transform and nourish body and mind; they are themselves formless and without substance, and so one can commune with spiritual clarity, and one’s lifespan can be equal to that of the sun and moon. This is called “emerging from death into life,” that is, moving from the realm of death toward the path of life.

The people of the world are different. They eat the five grains and greedily seek the five flavors; these have form and substance, so they deplete the true Qi they originally possess, scatter the light and pure qi, and cause turbid and impure qi (yin dregs) to settle within the body. This is called “emerging from life into death,” that is, moving from the path of life toward the realm of death.

Wu’s commentary says: “Emerging” is appearing from nonbeing into being; “entering” is returning from being into nonbeing. Zhuangzi says, “All things emerge from the mechanism and enter the mechanism”; in both cases, “emerging” means life and “entering” means death.

Lin’s commentary says: “Emerging from life into death” is the guiding principle of the entire chapter. “Emerging” is to detach transcendentally from the burden of material desires; “entering” is to be deluded and sink into oneself. Only one who possesses the Dao can “enter and then emerge.”

Now look at the following passage. Those who belong to the category of long life make up about three in ten; those who belong to the category of death also make up about three in ten; and there is another category of people who could have lived but, through reckless and willful action, move toward the realm of death—they too make up about three in ten. Why is this so? Because they are overly indulgent toward their own bodies and greedily seek an abundance of things for nourishing life, and thereby instead injure their vitality.

吕氏曰:阴阳不离於大道,造化不离於五行,和合有无而成天地,出机而生,入机而死,顺道者寡,违道者众,故养生者不妄视,不妄听,不妄谈,不妄履,动静恬然以自滋育者,生之徒也。趋死者目乱采色,耳听淫声,口美非道,足涉邪径,动静没溺,以自戕贼者,死之徒也。且生死之道,既分为二,又知作而不知休,知言而不知默,知思而不知忘,知进而不知退,以及於尽,则所谓动之死地。生死之道,以十有三言之,三者各居其三,而不生不死之道,在於虚一而已。所以不言者,欲其自悟也。原其十有三之说,前后解者虽多,终无定论,然其稍可取者,一二家而已。古言者,欲其自悟也。原其十有三之说,前后解者虽多,终无定论,然其稍可取者,一二家而已。古仙有云:阳里十三言有象,阴中六七觅无综。此指水火之成数也。天一生水,地六成之,地二生火,天七成之。七与六者乃心肾水火坎离,人之根本也。精神寓之,心藏神,肾藏精,凡圣日用应酬之际,无所不用其精神也。《黄庭经》:一身精神不可失,精神居身,生之徒也。精神去身,死之徒也。盖水火能活人,能杀人,岂非生死之徒乎。赤蛇才动,灵巍逐行,应速於谷,发疾於机,岂非动之死地乎。
Interpretation

Master Lü’s passage here is a commentary on Chapter 50 of the Daodejing, “Emerging into Life and Entering Death.”

Yin and Yang both do not depart from the Great Dao, and the transformation and generation of the myriad things likewise do not depart from the Five Phases. Yin and Yang, being and nonbeing, intermingle with one another, and thus Heaven and Earth are brought to completion. When a person emerges from the Dao’s causal nexus, they attain life; when they return to that nexus, they die. Those who accord with the Great Dao are few; those who contravene it are many. Therefore, one who understands nourishing life does not look recklessly, listen recklessly, speak recklessly, or act recklessly. In movement and stillness alike, such a person is calm and peaceful, nourishing and cultivating themselves—this belongs to the category of “life.” Those who pursue death have their eyes confused by the five colors, their ears filled with licentious sounds, their mouths praising words contrary to the Dao, and their feet walking onto deviant bypaths. In movement and stillness alike they are submerged in these things, harming themselves—this belongs to the category of “death.”

Since the Dao of life and death has already divided into two paths, people also often know only action and not stopping, only speaking and not silence, only thinking and not letting go, only advancing and not retreating, until they exhaust their vitality. This is what is meant by “moving into the land of death.” This scriptural passage uses “ten and three” to summarize it: the three categories—life, death, and moving into the land of death—each account for three tenths, while the Dao of neither life nor death lies in emptiness, stillness, and single-minded focus. The reason the text does not speak exhaustively is to make people realize it for themselves. Investigating the expression “ten and three,” although earlier commentaries are numerous, there is ultimately no settled conclusion; among them, only one or two are somewhat credible.

The ancient immortals said: “Within Yang, thirteen—words have form; within Yin, six and seven—seek the traceless.” This refers to the completion numbers of water and fire. Heaven generates water with One, and Earth completes it with Six; Earth generates fire with Two, and Heaven completes it with Seven. “Seven” and “six” correspond respectively to the heart and kidneys—that is, Kan and Li, water and fire—and are the root of the human body. Jing (essence) and Shen (spirit) are lodged herein: the heart stores Shen, the kidneys store Jing. Whether ordinary people or sages, in their daily handling of affairs and contact with things, none can do without the functioning of Jing and Shen. The Huangting Jing says: “The Jing and Shen of the whole body must not be lost.” When Jing and Shen remain in the body, this belongs to the category of life; when Jing and Shen leave the body, this belongs to the category of death. Water and fire can both nourish people and kill people—are these not precisely the two categories of life and death? The “Red Snake” is a Neidan (internal alchemy) term, a metaphor for the reckless movement of heart-fire or conscious spirit. As soon as it moves, it rises in response; its effect is faster than a valley echo, and its onset is more urgent than a mechanical trigger. Is this not “moving into the land of death”?

故曰生之徒十有三,死之徒十有三,人之生,动之死地,亦十有三。列子指髑髅而言之曰:此过乐乎,此过养乎。夫暖衣燠室,旨酒膏粱,服食金石,彼以养之之厚,而反伤其生,未若灰心息虑,薄滋味,养谷神,虽若轻生,可言之曰:此过乐乎,此过养乎。夫暖衣燠室,旨酒膏粱,服食金石,彼以养之之厚,而反伤其生,未若灰心息虑,薄滋味,养谷神,虽若轻生,可以长生也。○李氏曰:水成数六,火成数七,柔弱,生之徒,强大,死之徒,柔弱者则能惩忿窒欲,强大者为忿欲所使,能惩忿则火降,窒欲则水升,水火既济则生,故曰生之徒。起忿则无明,火炽纵欲,则苦海波翻,水火相违则死,故曰死之徒。人之生,皆赖水火,动之死地,水火相违,以丹道言之,水火既济,则圣胎凝矣。○林氏曰:养之得其道,则可以长生久视,养之不得其道,则与万物同尽。徒者言其类也。动之死地,动非动静之动,乃动辍之动也。之,往也,死地,死所也。夫何故,发问之辞也久视,养之不得其道,则与万物同尽。徒者言其类也。动之死地,动非动静之动,乃动辍之动也。之,往也,死地,死所也。夫何故,发问之辞也。生者,我所以生也。生生者,我所以养其生也。养其生而过於厚,所以动即趋於死地也。
Interpretation

Laozi says: In a person’s life, those who belong to the category of long life are three in ten; those who belong to the category of short life are three in ten; and those who in the course of life move toward the road of death because of excessive pursuit are also three in ten.

Liezi (a Daoist figure of the Warring States period, to whom the book Liezi is attributed) pointed at a skull (a dried human skull) and said: “Was it because of excessive indulgence in pleasure? Or because of excessive cultivation of life?” Wearing warm clothes, living in warm rooms, drinking fine wine, eating rich meat, and consuming minerals and metals (i.e., elixirs) were originally intended to nourish the body better, but instead harm life. It would be better to make the mind like dead ashes, stop thought and deliberation, eat a plain diet, and cultivate the Valley Spirit (Gushen, referring to the empty, still, and gentle Qi—vital energy—and spirit); this may seem to slight life, yet one can live long.

The commentator Li says: The completion number of water is six, and the completion number of fire is seven. The soft and weak belong to “the class of life”; the hard and strong belong to “the class of death.” A soft and weak person can restrain anger and block desires: by restraining anger, the heart-fire can descend; by blocking desires, the kidney-water can rise. When water and fire are harmonized, the vitality of life arises from this; therefore it is called “the class of life.” If one becomes angry, one becomes lost in “ignorance” (wuming, a Buddhist term referring to deluded and confused thoughts), and the fire blazes fiercely; if one indulges desires, the sea of desire surges with waves. When water and fire are at odds, one heads toward death; therefore it is called “the class of death.” Human survival depends entirely on water and fire; “moving to the place of death” means water and fire being at odds. From the perspective of the Dao of the elixir (the way of Neidan—internal alchemy—cultivation), when water and fire are mutually completed, the sacred embryo (the spiritual embryo formed through Neidan cultivation) can congeal.

The commentator Lin says: If one attains the Dao in nourishing life, one can achieve “long life and lasting vision” (a phrase from Laozi, meaning to live long); if one does not attain the Dao, one perishes together with the ten thousand things. “Tu” means the same kind. In “moving to the place of death,” “moving” (dong) is not the “movement” of movement and stillness, but the “dong” of “dongzhe” (at every turn, readily). “Zhi” means “to go to,” and “place of death” is the place where one dies. The phrase “for what reason” (fu he gu) has an interrogative tone. “Life” (sheng) is the root by which I live; “generating life” (sheng sheng) is what I rely on to protect and nourish this life. When protection and nourishment are excessive and exceed proper measure, one’s actions tend toward the place of death.

此即外身而身存,无而后能有,虚而后能盈之意也。○何氏曰:生死之徒,各十有三,诸家颇各有见,皆不过牵合十有三之数而已,要知上寿百岁,中寿下寿有差,与富康宁皆福也,此生之徒。凶短折疾忧贫弱,皆极也,此死之徒。未说及德与恶,而前之二者,各受命於天,谁能齐之,未是患处,若愚不肖,贪生失理,自作不静,以速其死者,不但为死徒,且趋死地,患在人耳。死地谓动於恶而不好德者,泛论世人如前三者,十分中各有其三,不必如前人牵合数目。但死之徒已十有三,而之死地,又十有三,死之分数十居其六,生之不必如前人牵合数目。但死之徒已十有三,而之死地,又十有三,死之分数十居其六,生之徒数,仅有三,可畏哉。若摄生避死,德人十有其一乎。《庄子》云:人之生也,气之聚也,聚而为生,散而为死,若死生为徒,吾又何患。是则所患者在死地,而不在死徒可见也。○吴氏曰:之犹适也,趋也。生生求以生其生也,厚谓用心太重,或仙术延生而失宜,或炼药卫生而过剂,其意正欲趋生而返趋於死地者,为其求生之心太重,而不顺乎自然也。
Interpretation

“By placing the self outside, the self is preserved” means that by first setting oneself aside, one can instead preserve oneself; only by first maintaining emptiness can one then become full.

Master He holds that human life and death each occupy “three-tenths of ten.” Longevity (a hundred years), middle lifespan, and lower lifespan each differ; together with wealth, sufficiency, peace, and health, all are blessings and belong to “the class of life” (those who belong to life). Premature death, illness, sorrow, poverty, and weakness are all extremes and belong to “the class of death” (those who belong to death). Both kinds of people receive their mandate from Heaven, and no one can change it; therefore these are not the most critical calamities. The true calamity lies in those who are ignorant and unworthy, who covet life and violate ordinary principles, who create agitation and unrest for themselves, and thus hasten their own death. They not only belong to “the class of death” but also move toward the “place of death” (a state of wallowing in evil conduct and having no love for virtue). The calamity comes from the people themselves.

Master He also says that, speaking generally of people in the world, the three categories above each account for three-tenths, and there is no need to force the numbers as earlier commentators did. Those who belong to death already make up three-tenths, and those who move toward the place of death make up another three-tenths; thus the proportion of death is six-tenths, while those who belong to life are only three-tenths—truly frightening. If one can nourish life and avoid death, could virtuous people account for one tenth?

The Zhuangzi says: “Human life is the gathering of Qi (vital energy); when Qi gathers, there is life; when it scatters, there is death. If life and death are fundamentally of the same kind, what do I have to worry about?” This shows that what truly ought to be worried about is the “place of death,” not “the class of death.”

Master Wu comments: “Zhi means ‘to go toward’ or ‘to tend toward.’ ‘Sheng sheng’ means trying every means to keep oneself alive. ‘Hou’ means using the mind too heavily: some use immortal arts to extend their years but lose proper measure; some refine medicines to nourish life but take them in excess. Their original intention is to seek life, yet the result is instead to move toward the place of death. The reason is that the mind seeking life is too intense and cannot accord with naturalness.”

The final sentence repeats Master Wu’s meaning: when the thought of seeking life is too heavy, it instead leads people toward the place of death, because such attachment goes against the principle of naturalness.

盖闻善,或炼药卫生而过剂,其意正欲趋生而返趋於死地者,为其求生之心太重,而不顺乎自然也。 盖闻善摄生者,陆行不遇兕虎,入军不被甲兵。兕无所投其角,虎无所措其爪,兵无所容其刃。夫何故?以其无死地也。 林氏曰:言我盖闻古之善养生者,虽陆行於深山而不遇兕虎,入於军旅之中,而不被甲兵,惟其无心,则物不能伤之。兕所以不能触,虎所以不能害,兵所以不能伤,惟其无心故也。《庄子》入水不溺,入火不焚,亦是此意。夫何故,又发一问,言物之所以不能伤者,以我能虚能无,而无所谓死地也。○吴氏曰:摄犹摄政意。夫何故,又发一问,言物之所以不能伤者,以我能虚能无,而无所谓死地也。○吴氏曰:摄犹摄政摄管之摄,谓不认生为己有,若暂焉管摄之也。以虚静为里,以柔弱为表,块然如木石之无知,侗然若婴儿之无欲,虽遇猛兽恶人,亦不能为害也。盖其查滓消融,神炁澹泊,如风如影,莫可执捉,无可死之质,纵有伤害之者,何从而伤害之哉。○李氏曰:无死地者,忘其死生也。○何氏曰:虎兕者,以驮之猛者言之,兕,野牛也,重千斤,一角。 第五十一章 道生之,德畜之,物形之,势成之。是驮之猛者言之,兕,野牛也,重千斤,一角。 第五十一章 道生之,德畜之,物形之,势成之。是以万物莫不尊道而贵德。夫道之尊,德之贵,夫莫之命而常自然。
Interpretation

This passage says that one who is skilled in nourishing life will not encounter fierce beasts when walking in mountains and forests, nor be wounded by blades and spears when amid military formations. The si (wild ox, a thousand jin in weight and single-horned) has nowhere to thrust its horns, the tiger nowhere to use its claws, and weapons nowhere to pierce. The reason is that he has no “death-ground”—that is, no fatal vulnerability in his person.

Master Lin says this is because the person can empty his mind and practice Wuwei (non-action), without selfish thoughts or distracting notions, so external things cannot harm him. The Zhuangzi’s statement that one “enters water and does not drown, enters fire and is not burned” is the same principle. “What is the reason?” is the author’s further question, and the answer lies precisely in being able to be empty and without substance, so that there is no place where death can occur.

Master Wu says that she is like the she in shezheng, “to act as regent,” and sheguan, “to manage on behalf of another”: it means not treating life as one’s own private possession, but merely managing it temporarily on its behalf. With emptiness and stillness as the inner essence and softness and weakness as the outward expression, such a person is wholly unknowing like wood and stone, plain and pure like an infant without desires. Even if he meets fierce beasts or wicked people, they cannot harm him. The dregs and impurities in him have already dissolved; his Jing (essence), Shen (spirit), and primordial Qi (vital energy) are tranquil and harmonious, like wind and shadow, impossible to grasp. He has no substantial entity that could be killed; even if someone wished to harm him, where could they strike?

Master Li says that “no death-ground” means forgetting the thought of life and death.

Master He says that the scripture takes the si and the tiger as examples because it selects the fiercest among fierce beasts to speak of.

Chapter Fifty-One (that is, chapter 51 of the Daodejing) says: Dao (the Way) generates all things, De (Virtue/Power) nourishes them, all things are given form, and circumstances bring their potential to completion. Therefore among all things there are none that do not honor the Dao and value De. The reason the Dao is honored and De is valued is not that anyone commands it, but that it is inherently so and naturally thus.

何氏曰:天覆以道而万物生,物物受炁於天也,地载以物而万物畜,物物受质於地也,故万物生者自形自色,非待物物而雕琢之。阴阳相照,四时相代,相生相杀,其势因成,孰能御之。夫形有时而弊,势有时而倾,惟道德在天地,高厚悠久,不坏不灭。《易》曰:乾以君之,坤以藏之,故道为至尊,其独无对。德为至贵势有时而倾,惟道德在天地,高厚悠久,不坏不灭。《易》曰:乾以君之,坤以藏之,故道为至尊,其独无对。德为至贵,其高无上,物虽有万之不齐,孰能如此。盖道德超然物势之上,而行乎形气之内,而无物不有,无时不然,盈天地之间,皆东衣被,本本元元,之所共推,非由於谆谆之命,非有假於人为之力,其生之畜之,一自然也。可尊可贵,亦一自然也。然生畜形成次第,虽有道德物势之分合,而言之一道而已。○林氏曰:道自然也,无也,凡物皆徇无而生,故曰道生之,德则有述矣,故曰畜之。畜者有也。物则有形矣,故曰物形之。势则有对矣,故曰势成之。阴阳之相偶,四时之相因,皆势也。莫知命者,犹曰莫之为而为也。非有所使然,则为常自然曰物形之。势则有对矣,故曰势成之。阴阳之相偶,四时之相因,皆势也。莫知命者,犹曰莫之为而为也。非有所使然,则为常自然矣。尊贵者,言其超出乎万物之上也。○李氏曰:道本无形,因生育天地而形可见,道本无名,因长养万物而名始立,一切有相受命于天,成形于地,察炁中和,皆道之荫也,故万物莫不尊道而贵德。
Interpretation

Mr. He holds that Heaven covers all things by means of Dao (the Way), and only then can they grow, because all things receive Qi (vital energy) from Heaven. Earth supports them by means of “things,” and only then can they be nurtured, because all things receive form and substance from Earth. Thus, as all things grow, each takes its own form and color without needing external things to carve and polish it. Yin-Yang reflect one another, the four seasons alternate, and they generate and restrain one another; their momentum takes shape naturally—who can control it? Bodies sometimes decay and situations sometimes overturn, yet only Dao and De (Virtue/Power) exist between Heaven and Earth, lofty and far-reaching, deep and substantial, enduring and long-lasting, neither destroyed nor extinguished. The Zhouyi (Book of Changes) says, “Qian rules them, Kun stores them.” Therefore Dao is the most honored, unique and without counterpart; De is the most noble, unsurpassably high. Though the myriad things are infinitely varied, who can be like them?

Dao and De transcend the situations and forms of the myriad things, yet they operate within the Qi of the formed and the formless. They are present everywhere and at all times, fill the space between Heaven and Earth, shelter and nurture all things, and are jointly revered as the root of roots and the origin of origins. They do not proceed from repeated commands, nor do they rely on human force; their generating and nurturing of all things are entirely natural. Their being worthy of honor and nobility is likewise natural. Although generation and nurturing have a sequence of before and after, and although Dao and De and the circumstances of things may separate and unite, in the final analysis there is only one Dao.

Mr. Lin (the commentator) says: Dao is naturalness and is “nonbeing.” All things arise by following “nonbeing,” and so it is said that “Dao generates them.” De then has the function described above, and so it is said that it “nurtures them”; “nurture” means “to have.” When things possess form, it is said that “things give them form.” When circumstances have counterparts, it is said that “circumstances complete them.” Yin-Yang coordinating with one another and the four seasons succeeding one another are all circumstances. Those who do not understand this “mandate” speak as if “no one acts, yet it is done”—that is, no one causes it to be so, yet it is so of itself. This is constant naturalness. “Honored and noble” means that it stands above the myriad things.

Mr. Li (the commentator) says: Dao is originally without form; because it transforms and gives birth to Heaven and Earth, form first becomes manifest. Dao is originally without name; because it nurtures all things, names first become established. All things that have appearances receive their mandate from Heaven, take form on Earth, and obtain the Qi of central harmony; all are sheltered by Dao. Therefore there is no thing among the myriad things that does not honor Dao and value De.

故道生之畜之,长之育之,成之熟之,养之覆之。生而不有,为而不恃,长而不宰,是谓玄德。 何氏曰:《庄子》:道者万物所共由,庶物失之者死,得之者生,故道生之畜之,有如春道,长之育之,有如夏道,成之熟之,有如秋道,养之覆之,有如冬道。《庚桑子》:春炁发而百草生,正得秋而万宝成,岂无得而然哉。大道已行矣,此也,此道何道也,虚无自《庚桑子》:春炁发而百草生,正得秋而万宝成,岂无得而然哉。大道已行矣,此也,此道何道也,虚无自然之道,能生出万物於始,又能牧藏万物於终,乾坤动静,不翕聚则不能发散,《庚桑子》即春生秋成而见大道,老子以发生致覆藏为一道。《易》曰:显诸仁,藏诸用是矣。天地无心也,虽生全不伤,亦不名有,虽施为不辞,亦不恃功,虽长养不穷,亦不为主,四时之运,功成者退,太虚冥冥,谁能强名。玄德,天德也,道也。○林氏曰:长之育之,成之熟之,养之覆之,皆言既生既有之后,其在天地之间,生生不穷,皆造化之力也。然造化不有之成之熟之,养之覆之,皆言既生既有之后,其在天地之间,生生不穷,皆造化之力也。然造化不有之以为有,不恃之以为功,虽为之长而无主宰之心,此所以为玄妙之德,玄德即造化也。 第五十二章
Interpretation

The Dao gives birth to the ten thousand things, nourishes and rears them, causes them to grow, cultivates them, brings them to maturity and completion, maintains them, and shelters them. The Dao gives them life and nourishes them, yet does not take them as its own; it acts, yet does not rely on its merit; it causes them to grow, yet does not master them. This is called “xuan De” (profound and mysterious virtue).

He [the commentator] cites the Zhuangzi: “The Dao is what all things follow in common; when creatures lose it they die, when they obtain it they live.” Thus “the Dao gives them life and nourishes them” is like the Dao of spring; “causes them to grow and rears them” is like the Dao of summer; “brings them to maturity and completion” is like the Dao of autumn; “maintains and shelters them” is like the Dao of winter. The Gengsangzi (that is, the “Gengsang Chu” chapter of the Zhuangzi, in which Gengsangzi is a figure) says: When the spring Qi stirs, the hundred grasses grow; when autumn comes, the ten thousand things mature—could this be so spontaneously without anything on which to rely? The Great Dao has already been put into practice; it is precisely here. What Dao is this? It is the Dao of emptiness, non-being, and naturalness: it can give birth to the ten thousand things at the beginning and gather them in at the end. In heaven and earth, movement and stillness, opening and closing—without gathering, there can be no dispersal. Thus in the birth of spring and the completion of autumn the Great Dao can be seen; Laozi joins “generation” and “covering and storing” into a single Dao. The Yi says, “It manifests in benevolence and conceals itself in use”—this is exactly the meaning.

Heaven and earth have no selfish mind; therefore they give birth to and nourish the ten thousand things without harming them, and do not claim to possess them. They act without shirking, and do not rely on their merit; they grow and nourish the ten thousand things without exhausting them, and do not set themselves up as masters. The four seasons run their course, and when the work is accomplished they withdraw. The Great Void is deep, distant, dark, and obscure—who can force a name upon it? “Xuan De” is heavenly De; it is also the Dao.

Lin says: From “causes them to grow and rears them” through “brings them to maturity and completion, maintains and shelters them,” all of this means that after the ten thousand things have already been generated and have taken form, their unceasing generation and reproduction between heaven and earth is entirely the work of creative transformation. Creative transformation does not take generation as its own possession, does not regard accomplishment as merit; although it grows and nourishes the ten thousand things, it has no mind to master them. Therefore this is mysterious De. Xuan De is creative transformation.

天下有始,以为天下母。既知其母,以知其子,既知其子,复守其母,没身不殆。 吕氏曰:《列子》有太易,有太初,有太始,有太素。太易者未见炁也,太初者炁之始也,原夫道者,未始有始也。外包乾坤,内充宇宙,无形无名,万物之所以资始也。及其有也,原夫道者,未始有始也。外包乾坤,内充宇宙,无形无名,万物之所以资始也。及其有名则物得以资生焉。有物混成,先天地生,故为天下始。生育天地,长养万物,故为天下母,而万物所以成也。譬夫一身之天下,始因三元育德,九炁结形,自非三元所育,九炁所导,莫能生也,则为一身之始母焉。故曰天下有始,以为天下母。既得其炁,以为百骸之母,当知其子,子神也,既以子为元神,母为元炁,母在则子存,母去则子泣,以其炁能生神,而神能服炁也。丹经谓之君臣,亦云母子,古之真人云:子母乍逢情春恋,君臣相会喜团乐。盖形中子母,炁以守神,。丹经谓之君臣,亦云母子,古之真人云:子母乍逢情春恋,君臣相会喜团乐。盖形中子母,炁以守神,神以守炁,交相恋守,混融为一,结就胎仙,与天相毕。故曰既得其母,复知其子,既知其子,复守其母,没身不殆。○林氏曰:天下有始,以为母,即有名万物之母也。母,造化也,子,万物也。知有造化而复知有万物,知有万物又当知有造化。盖言无能生有,有出於无,知有者不可以不知无,常无欲以观其妙,常有欲以观其徼,亦是此意。没身不殆者,言如此则终身无危殆之事也。○董思靖曰:人受炁以生,炁为母,神寓於炁,故为子守母,则炁专神安。○何氏曰:经曰:无名天地之始,受炁以生,炁为母,神寓於炁,故为子守母,则炁专神安。○何氏曰:经曰:无名天地之始,有名万物之母,即此章始与母之旨,太始有无而已,自无适有者为母,如道生一是也。自有适有者为子,一生二,二生三,三生万物是也。
Interpretation

Laozi says: “The world has a beginning, and it is taken as the mother of the world.” The myriad things in the world have a beginning; this beginning is the root and mother of the myriad things. Once this mother is known, one can thereby know the children born of her; having known the children, one must turn back and guard the mother, and in this way one will not fall into danger throughout life.

Master Lü, citing the Liezi, divides the evolution of the cosmos into four stages: Taiyi (Great Change), Taichu (Great Beginning), Taishi (Great Commencement), and Taisu (Great Simplicity). Taiyi is the state in which Qi has not yet manifested; Taichu is the time when Qi first appears. Tracing back to Dao, it has never had a beginning. Dao outwardly envelops heaven and earth and inwardly fills the universe; it is formless and nameless, and it is the root on which the myriad things depend for their beginning. Only when Dao came to have concrete existence could the myriad things grow. The saying “There is a thing formed in chaos, born before heaven and earth” means that Dao existed before heaven and earth, and so it is the beginning of the world. It transforms and gives birth to heaven and earth, nurtures the myriad things, and so it is the mother of the world; the myriad things are also brought to completion through it.

Applied to a single person, the human body, this “small world,” also has its own beginning and mother. First, the Three Primes (referring to Jing, Qi, and Shen) nurture and transform the virtuous nature; next, the various primordial Qi (jiuqi, the nine Qi) congeal to form the physical body. If it were not nurtured by the Three Primes and guided by the various primordial Qi, the human being could not come into being; therefore Qi is the originating mother of the whole body. Once Qi is obtained, Qi is the mother of all the bones and joints of the body. Next one must know its child; the child is Shen. Shen is taken as original Shen, and Qi as original Qi (pre-heaven Qi): when Qi is present, Shen remains; when Qi departs, Shen grieves and weeps. This is because Qi can generate Shen, and Shen can govern Qi. The alchemical scriptures (classics of Daoist Neidan, internal alchemy, cultivation) compare the two to ruler and minister and also call them mother and child. An ancient Perfected One (zhenren) said in a poem: “When mother and child first meet, their feelings are tenderly attached; when ruler and minister come together, they rejoice in reunion.” Within the body, mother and child depend on each other; Qi guards Shen, and Shen guards Qi. They are attached and keep watch over each other, blending into one and forming the sacred embryo (the inner sacred embryo formed through cultivation), and then one can share the lifespan of heaven and earth. Therefore it is said: “Having obtained the mother, one further knows the child; having known the child, one further guards the mother; to the end of one’s life there is no danger.”

The commentator Lin says: “The world has a beginning, and it is taken as the mother of the world” refers to the named mother of the myriad things. The mother is the root of creation and transformation; the child is the myriad things. Knowing that there is creation and transformation, one must also know that there are myriad things; knowing that there are myriad things, one should also know the source of their creation and transformation. This means that non-being can generate being, and being emerges from non-being. One who understands “being” must not fail to understand “non-being”; therefore Laozi says, “Constantly without desire, one observes its mystery; constantly with desire, one observes its manifestations,” which has the same meaning. “To the end of one’s life there is no danger” means that by doing so one will be free from danger throughout life.

The commentator Dong Sijing says: Human beings are born by receiving Qi; Qi is the mother, and Shen resides within Qi, so Shen is the child. When the child guards the mother, Qi becomes concentrated and Shen becomes stable.

The commentator He says: The scriptural saying “The nameless is the beginning of heaven and earth; the named is the mother of the myriad things” is precisely the central meaning of this chapter’s discussion of beginning and mother. The state of Taishi is nothing more than the two modes of being and non-being. From non-being to being is the mother, as in “Dao produces one”; from being to being is the child, as in “one produces two, two produces three, three produce the myriad things.”

塞其兑,闭其门,终身不勤。开其兑,济其事,终身不救。 吕氏曰:夫乾坤者易之门户,开阖有常,众卦从而出焉,生化之机,准的不差,而兑者悦也,散也,盖耳目诸根色尘之所由,若塞爱悦之视听,则祸福之门闭矣,自然而身不勤劳也。倘开其爱悦之门而弗塞,则嗜欲之情长矣,终身危亡不诸根色尘之所由,若塞爱悦之视听,则祸福之门闭矣,自然而身不勤劳也。倘开其爱悦之门而弗塞,则嗜欲之情长矣,终身危亡不可救也。以己论之,兑者口也,门者目也,常缄其口,则五炁内固,元精不乾,常暝其目,则内境不出,外境不入,寂然泰定,与道为一矣。《参同契》曰:耳目己之宝,闭固勿发扬,兑口勿以谈,希之顺以洪,此所谓塞其兑,闭其门,终身不勤。若乃开其喜悦之门而勿塞,济其爱欲之事而弗闭,物诱於外,情动於中,气亡液漏,精神散去,其神夭阏,而莫之能救,故曰开其兑,济其事,终身不救。○林氏曰:兑者口也,人身则有口,人家则有门,皆以喻万物所自出之地。塞其兑,闭其门,藏有於无而不露也。不勤,不劳口也,人身则有口,人家则有门,皆以喻万物所自出之地。塞其兑,闭其门,藏有於无而不露也。不勤,不劳而成功也。开其兑,出而用之也。济其事,用之而求益也。济,益也。如此则危殆不可救也。○何氏曰:门,古注指口,亦不拘此,但有出有入者,总谓之门。闭其门者,冥心大道也,外想不入,内想不出,《庄子》其心以为不然者,天门弗开是也。盖塞兑闭门,入无灭有,於子知母,乃返吾初,终其身而用之不勤矣。若开兑济事,则一念一动,迷惑本来,毁无失有,如母诞子,托相万状,子壮母衰,转轮无已,终其身而难救。○李氏曰:塞兑闭门,内境不出,外境不入,终身不勤,不劳而治也。开其兑,济其事,内境出,外境入,终身不救,永失真道。
Interpretation

This passage comes from Laozi, Chapter 52, and discusses the essential self-cultivation practice of conserving spirit and settling the mind. The original text says: Block the openings of the senses and close the doors of outward pursuit, and one may go through life without toil; open the senses, indulge them, and foster desires, and one will go through life beyond rescue.

Master Lü: Qian and Kun are the gates of the Yijing (Book of Changes), and the generation and transformation of the myriad things issue forth from them. Dui is joy and outward dispersion; it refers to the pathways by which the sense organs—ears, eyes, mouth, and so on—come into contact with sounds and sights. If one blocks greedy attachment to and gazing upon sounds and sights, the gate of misfortune and fortune is closed, and body and mind are naturally without toil. If one opens the gate of love and delight without blocking it, the feelings of craving and desire grow day by day, and in the end one will face danger and death beyond rescue. In terms of the body, Dui refers to the mouth and the door refers to the eyes: if one constantly closes the mouth, the Qi of the five viscera is internally secured and Yuanjing (prenatal essence) is not depleted; if one constantly closes the eyes, the inner and outer realms do not intersect, and the mind becomes still and settled, united with the Dao. The Cantong qi (a classic of alchemical Daoism by Wei Boyang of the Eastern Han) says: “The ears and eyes are one’s own treasures; one should close and store them and not expose them outwardly; the mouth and tongue should speak little, and by the way of softness and compliance one maintains generosity.” This is what is meant by “block its openings, close its doors, and throughout life be without toil.” If one opens the gate of joy and further indulges the affairs of desire, external things entice from without and emotions stir within; Qi leaks and fluids drain, spirit is dissipated, vitality is cut short, and one cannot be saved. Therefore it says, “throughout life beyond rescue.”

Master Lin: Dui is the mouth; the door is the mouth or the eyes. The human body has a mouth as a house has a door, and both are used as metaphors for the places from which the myriad things arise. Blocking Dui and closing the door means storing the existent within the nonexistent, not allowing it to be exposed outwardly. “Without toil” means succeeding without labor. “Opening its openings” means employing them outwardly; “furthering its affairs” means using them to seek increase. In this way one falls into danger and cannot be rescued.

Master He: The door should not be rigidly restricted to the mouth; wherever there is exit and entry may be called a door. Closing the door means quietly guarding the Great Dao, so that external thoughts do not enter and internal thoughts do not go out, just as Zhuangzi speaks of “the heavenly gate not being opened.” Blocking Dui and closing the door is returning from the existent to the nonexistent, from the child seeking the mother, returning to the original beginning; using it for a lifetime is not laborious. If one opens Dui and furthers affairs, then every thought and every movement deludes one’s original nature, like a mother giving birth: the children take myriad forms, and as the children grow the mother declines; birth and death flow on, cycling without cease, and throughout life it is difficult to recover.

Master Li: Blocking Dui and closing the door, the inner realm does not go out and the outer realm does not enter; thus without toil one obtains order. Opening Dui and furthering affairs, the inner realm overflows outward and the outer realm invades inward; throughout life it is difficult to rescue, and one forever loses the true Dao.

见小曰明,守柔曰强。用其光,复归其明,无遗身殃。是谓袭常。 林氏曰:所见者大,能敛而小,则为至身不救,永失真道。 见小曰明,守柔曰强。用其光,复归其明,无遗身殃。是谓袭常。 林氏曰:所见者大,能敛而小,则为至明。所主者刚,能退而守柔,则为至强。即不自见故明,不自矜故长。光者明之用,明者光之体,用其光而归之於明,则无殃咎矣。知用而不知藏,则遗殃之道也。袭者藏也,常者不易也,袭常者,言藏其用而不穷也。○何氏曰:凡能大不能小,能强不能弱,能明不能晦,则弃本徇末,子复生子,流落忘返,其如母何,是则自遗其殃矣。盖始者常无之 道,母者常有之道,自无生有,自有返无,此大常不变之道也。又曰晦,则弃本徇末,子复生子,流落忘返,其如母何,是则自遗其殃矣。盖始者常无之 道,母者常有之道,自无生有,自有返无,此大常不变之道也。又曰:用光归明,圣人光而不耀也。察见渊鱼者不祥。○吕氏曰:水镜之照物谓之光,其光之体谓之明,用其照外之光,回光照内,复反而归藏於其内,体之明也。夫神太用则竭,照见渊鱼者不祥,此用光於外而遗其身殃者。能含光以混世,则不为身殃矣。是谓能掩藏其常光之用,以复归常明之体,故曰袭常。
Interpretation

The scripture says: To see the subtle is clarity; to guard the soft and weak is strength. To use this light and again return to inner clarity—thus one will not leave disaster for oneself. This is called following the constant Dao (the Way).

Mr. Lin (a Song dynasty commentator) says: If what one sees is vast, yet one can draw it in and perceive the minute—this is the highest clarity. If what one holds is strength, yet one can yield and guard the soft and weak—this is the highest strength. Because one does not display oneself, one is clear; because one does not boast, one endures. Light is the function of clarity; clarity is the substance of light. To use light and return to clarity, then there is no disaster. To know only how to use and not how to store is the path that leaves calamity behind. “Xi” means to store; “chang” means unchanging; “xi chang” means to store its function so that it is not exhausted.

Mr. He (a commentator) says: Whoever can accomplish great things but cannot guard the small, can maintain strength but cannot show weakness, can reveal light but cannot conceal it—such a person abandons the root and pursues the branch tips. This is like a child begetting a child, wandering abroad and forgetting to return; “what then of the mother?”—it amounts to leaving disaster for oneself. Here “beginning” refers to the Dao of constant non-being, and “mother” to the Dao of constant being (a phrase from the first chapter of the Laozi). From non-being, being arises; from being, one returns to non-being—this is the great Dao that is constant and unchanging.

He also said: To employ light and return to clarity is the sage’s light without display. The Laozi also says, “He who scrutinizes the fish in the abyss is ill-omened”; this means that excessively peering at the tiny fish in the deep is inauspicious.

Mr. Lü (a commentator) says: Water and a mirror reflect all things; this outward-shining function is called “light”; the substance on which light relies is called “clarity.” To draw back the outwardly shining light, reflect it inward, and return it to be stored within oneself is the clarity of the substance. If Jing (essence) and Shen (spirit) are overused, they will be depleted; “to see the fish in the abyss is inauspicious” speaks precisely of directing light toward external things and leaving disaster for oneself. If one can conceal the light and blend one’s brilliance with the dust of the world, one will not invite disaster. This is to conceal the outward function of light and return to the constantly clear substance; therefore it is called “xi chang” (storing the constant).

第五十三章 使我介然有知,行於大道,惟施是畏。 吴氏曰:我者泛言众人,非老子自谓也。介音戛,《孟子》介然用之而成路,同谓倏然之顷也。知字句绝施如《论语》无施劳,《孟子》施施从外来之施,矜夸张大也。圣门颜子,有若无,实若虚,无施劳,老子之用,盖亦若此,夸张军其所忌,此章言不知道之人夸张大也。圣门颜子,有若无,实若虚,无施劳,老子之用,盖亦若此,夸张军其所忌,此章言不知道之人,惟务夸张,若使其人倏然之顷有所知,而欲行大道,则必专以施为畏而不敢为也。○李氏曰:惟施是畏,识法者恐。○柴氏曰:大道之外,行者皆可畏。 大道甚夷,而民好径。
Interpretation

Laozi says: If I had even a little understanding and walked on the great Dao, what I would fear most is going astray and indulging in exaggeration and display. The great Dao is originally level and broad, yet people in the world insist on preferring shortcuts.

Wu Cheng, a Yuan-dynasty scholar, holds that “I” refers generally to ordinary people and is not Laozi’s self-reference. “Jie” has the same sound as “jia” and means suddenly, in an instant. “Shi” takes its sense from the Analects’ “wu shi lao” (do not boast of one’s labors) and the Mencius’ “shi shi cong wai lai” (coming swaggeringly from outside), referring to self-importance and showing off. People like Yan Hui (“Yanzi of the Sage’s school,” a disciple of Confucius) were full of learning yet seemed empty, and did not boast of their merits; what Laozi calls “use” is probably also this sort of state. Those who do not understand the Dao merely devote themselves to display and boasting. If such a person suddenly had some realization and wished to walk the great Dao, he would certainly take boasting as a warning and not dare to act recklessly.

Mr. Li says: “Only shi is to be feared” is what those who understand proper measure and rule are on guard against. Mr. Chai says: all the various paths outside the great Dao are worthy of caution.

吴氏曰:径,小路也,与大道相反,卑卑欲退者,大道也,其道甚平夷而易行,堂堂夸张者,小径也。而人多好行之。○吕氏曰:大道,亨衢也。平易坦然,何往不通。虽千万里之遥,其平夷而易行,堂堂夸张者,小径也。而人多好行之。○吕氏曰:大道,亨衢也。平易坦然,何往不通。虽千万里之遥,其行必始於足下,圣人患其太直,踌躇兴事,岂贵其速达而要其近功哉。世人利於速达,故由捷径。然崎岖迷惑,不知所趣,倒行逆施,去道愈远,无由上达也。炼养之道,夷然如砥,甚易知易行,一曲之士,滞於方隅,欲其速得,游於傍门,陷於邪径,而不知也。故曰大道甚夷,而民好径。○何氏曰:大道平夷,本若大路,然而舍之入邪径,则迷之甚矣。 朝甚除,田甚芜,仓甚虚,服文采,带利剑,厌饮食,资财有余,是谓盗夸。非道哉! 吴氏曰:此言夸张之事,有廷内而弗洒弗扫者,厌饮食,资财有余,是谓盗夸。非道哉!
Interpretation

Laozi uses the “Great Dao (the Way)” and “bypaths” as a comparison. The Great Dao is level and broad, easy to walk, yet it is often overlooked; bypaths are rugged and winding, but precisely because they look imposing and showy on the outside, people are instead glad to take them.

Master Lü (the commentator) says: The Great Dao is a great road extending in all directions, level and open; wherever one goes, it can be reached. Even if the journey is a thousand or ten thousand li, one must still begin step by step from beneath one’s feet. The sage worries that people in the world are too impatient, so he acts cautiously and deliberates calmly; he does not value speed or pursue immediate results. People in the world crave quick arrival, so they take shortcuts. But shortcuts are rugged and misleading, and one does not know where they lead; the more one reverses the proper order and acts contrary, the farther one is from the Dao, and one simply cannot reach upward. The way of cultivation and nurturing nature is originally as level as a whetstone, extremely easy to know and extremely easy to practice. But those who see only the principle of one corner are confined in a corner; wishing to attain the Dao quickly, they turn to heterodox side doors and left-hand paths, and stray onto evil roads without realizing it. Therefore it is said: “The Great Dao is very level, but people prefer bypaths.”

Master He says: The Great Dao is level and is originally like a great road. If one abandons it and walks a crooked path, one’s confusion becomes even deeper.

Master Wu says: This passage speaks of ostentatious and flashy matters. The court is outwardly clean and orderly, yet the fields are overgrown and the granaries are empty; people wear gorgeous patterned clothes, carry sharp swords at their waists, are glutted with food and drink, and still have surplus wealth and goods. This is called “robbery and ostentation,” that is, having stolen the people’s wealth and yet boasting of it. How could this be conduct in accord with the Dao!

吴氏曰:此言夸张之事,有廷内而弗洒弗扫者,唐风之俭啬,朝甚除治,则其宫室之奢靡可知矣。田甚芜,仓甚虚,谓夺其民时而民不得耕耨,竭其民力而民无所蓄积也。华其佩服以为饰,丰其酒肉以为养,私其府库以为富,是犹为盗之人,得物之多,以夸张於外者尔,夏季商辛是也,岂知道者所肯为哉。○林氏曰:大道甚平,人之求道,不知适正,好行邪径之路,譬如有国家者,治其朝廷则甚整,为宫室台榭之类也。朝廷虽美,而田亩皆芜,仓廪皆虚,而且以文彩为服,佩带利剑,厌足饮食,积其资财,务为富强,此如盗贼之人,自夸其能,是岂可久。此譬喻之语也。言人不知大道而自矜聪明,自夸闻见,此好径之徒也。岂知至道,故曰非道哉。○何氏曰:朝甚除,此除者修治也,传曰:粪除先人之弊庐,又云除道,皆修治意人不知大道而自矜聪明,自夸闻见,此好径之徒也。岂知至道,故曰非道哉。○何氏曰:朝甚除,此除者修治也,传曰:粪除先人之弊庐,又云除道,皆修治意。 第五十四章 善建者不拔,善抱者不脱,子孙以祭杞不辍。
Interpretation

Master Wu says: This passage speaks of a situation that is outwardly extravagant but inwardly empty. Within the court, sweeping is carried to an extreme; even corners where no one lives are not left unsprinkled or unswept—this frugal and sparing atmosphere is just like what is written in the “Tang Feng” of Tang. The court is ordered in this way, and from this one can see how lavish the palace chambers must be. That the fields are overgrown and the granaries empty means that the ruler has taken away the people’s seasons for farming, exhausted their strength, and left them unable to cultivate the land or accumulate anything. To adorn oneself with fine ornaments and clothing, to provide abundantly for wine and meat, and to appropriate the treasuries for oneself in pursuit of wealth—this is like robbers: the more they seize, the more they show off to others. Jie of Xia and King Zhou of Shang, Di Xin, were exactly such examples. How could one who understands the Dao do such things?

Master Lin says: The great Dao is originally extremely level, but when people in the world seek the Dao they do not walk the proper road; they prefer to take deviant side paths. This is like a ruler who puts the court in meticulous order, builds palaces, towers, and pavilions, so that the court appears beautiful, while the fields are overgrown and the granaries are empty. He also makes clothing of gorgeous patterned finery, wears sharp swords, indulges to the fullest in food and drink, accumulates goods and wealth, and single-mindedly pursues wealth and power. This is like robbers boasting of their prowess—how could such a situation last long? These are words spoken as an analogy: they mean that people who do not understand the great Dao but are self-conceited about their cleverness and boast of their own knowledge and experience are those who walk the side paths. They do not understand the supreme Dao, and so the scripture says, “This is not the Dao!”

Master He says: In the scriptural phrase “the court is very much chu,” the word chu means to repair and put in order. Ancient books say, “to sweep and clean the humble hut of one’s forebears,” and also speak of “repairing the road”; both carry the sense of putting things in order.

Chapter Fifty-Four: One who is good at establishing a foundation will not have it pulled up; one who is good at holding fast will not let it slip away. Thus descendants will continue sacrifices from generation to generation without interruption. Here a tree is used as an analogy to explain that in establishing oneself and cultivating the Dao, one must have firm roots and not lose one’s hold, so that it may endure and continue.

吕氏曰:善以道建国者,独立万物之上,终古不易,翱翔万物之表,终古不极,以是道而立身,以是道而建天下,守之以中,体之以常,镇之以无名之朴,而不为物之迁变,福及后世,其德弥广,其用弥大,不可动摇也。若夫根技则气竭,青去木矣,炁败则精竭,神明为物之迁变,福及后世,其德弥广,其用弥大,不可动摇也。若夫根技则气竭,青去木矣,炁败则精竭,神明去身矣,是以至人固蒂深根,独立广漠之野,无何有之乡,绵绵冥冥,屹立不可拔,善以道抱民者,乘天地之正,御六炁之辩,天下之士,定於一心,百姓归附矣。修一己则抱元守一,神全精反,回风混合於丹田,永无脱离矣。故曰善抱者不脱,夫善建善抱者,岂惟不拔不脱乎,亦将德泽流于上下,孝慈被于子孙,世祚绵远,传之无穷,岂不美哉。○何氏曰:《庄子》名为建德之国,其民愚而朴,故善言建者,无加於德,则人亦与立而不拔去之矣。经曰:抱一为天下式,故善於言抱者,无出於一,则人亦不离心无加於德,则人亦与立而不拔去之矣。经曰:抱一为天下式,故善於言抱者,无出於一,则人亦不离心而脱去之矣。岂惟在其身,将子孙亦嘉赖之,承祀悠远。以道观者,故不私为子孙计,而立教垂世,非专为山谷枯槁者言,所谓大德必得其禄位名寿,而宗庙享之,子孙保之是也。○林氏曰:建者无不拔,抱者无不脱,建德而抱朴,则不技不脱矣。有子孙之家,祭祀必不辍。道生一,一生二,二生三,三生万物,万物生而不穷,亦犹子孙嗣其家者也。此三句皆是比喻,以言道虽有无而实长存也。 修之身,其德乃真。修之家,其德乃余万物,万物生而不穷,亦犹子孙嗣其家者也。此三句皆是比喻,以言道虽有无而实长存也。 修之身,其德乃真。修之家,其德乃余。修之乡,其德乃长。修之国,其德乃丰。修之天下,其德乃普。 吕氏曰:修身之道,举措施设,酬酢应变,未尝不自我而起,炼炁养神,少私寡欲,诸伪咸尽,乃为真人矣。修之於家,则父慈子孝,兄友弟恭,九族和睦,积善有余,庆流来世矣。修之於乡,则尊奉耆老,教诲愚鄙,上下信向,其德久长矣。修之於国,则百官称职,祸乱不生,万宝丰熟,物充实矣。修之於天下,则不教而治,不言而化,和於大通,比屋可封,德施周普矣。夫修之家乡国天下,上言其德,乃余乃长,乃丰乃普,惟修天下,则不教而治,不言而化,和於大通,比屋可封,德施周普矣。夫修之家乡国天下,上言其德,乃余乃长,乃丰乃普,惟修之身,言其德乃真者,《庄子》所谓道之真以治身,其绪余土直以治天下。本在身,末在彼,其理备矣。○林氏曰:修诸身则实而无伪,修诸家则积而有余庆,修之乡则一乡之所尊,修诸国则其及人愈盛,修之天下,则及人者愈遍。○吴氏曰:道之真以治身,其绪余以治人。家者一身之外,九族之内,乡者一家之外,乡遂之内,国者乡遂之外,邦畿之内。天下者,邦畿之外,四海之内。修之於家乡国天下者,言自近及远,人人各修其德也。然岂是人人教之使之内。天下者,邦畿之外,四海之内。修之於家乡国天下者,言自近及远,人人各修其德也。然岂是人人教之使然,我无为而民自化尔。○何氏曰:内而身与家,以此道修之则真积力久,且有余矣。外而乡国天下,以此道修之,则源深流长,且丰且普矣。 故以身观身,以家观家,以乡观乡,以国观国,以天下观天下。吾何以知天下之然哉?以此。 林氏曰:即吾一身,而可以观他人之身,即吾一家,而可以观他人之家,即吾一乡,而可以观他人之乡,推之於国於天下皆然,言道之所用皆身,而可以观他人之身,即吾一家,而可以观他人之家,即吾一乡,而可以观他人之乡,推之於国於天下皆然,言道之所用皆同也。以此者,道也,以道而观则天下无不然。○李氏曰:以之修身,观心察性,心定则身之修也。以之治国,观民察己,民化则国之治也。天下有一不善,则是自己政化不善也。《书》曰:百姓有过,在予一人,此之谓也。反观诸己心,有一尘染着,则是我之性天不明也。○董氏曰:观之之道,其则不远,岂假他求哉。盖物分虽殊,一本而已,以此观之,莫不然者,此意当契於语言之外。 道德真经集义卷之七竟 盱江危大有集 第五十五章 含德之厚,比於赤子。 林氏曰:含德,以此观之,莫不然者,此意当契於语言之外。 道德真经集义卷之七竟 盱江危大有集 第五十五章 含德之厚,比於赤子。 林氏曰:含德,含蓄而不露也,厚者至也,含德而极其至,则如赤子然。○何氏曰:大丈夫处其厚不处其薄,则厚德者大人事也。护精保气,执冲合和,大人者不失其赤子之心是也。○李氏曰:含德之厚比於赤子者,不失赤子之心也。○吴氏曰:含怀至厚之德於内者,有如婴儿也。上篇曰:专炁至柔,能婴儿,常德不离,复归於婴儿,孟子曰:大人者不失其赤子之心也。○苏氏曰:老子之言道德,每以婴儿比之者,言其体未及於用也。○吕氏曰:圣人抱道怀德,深厚纯粹,无为无事,用志不分,乃凝於神,如赤子焉。赤子者,取其始生之色而喻之也。又曰:上一赤子乃泥丸,天帝之名也。素抱内蕴,真纯不散,若婴儿之未孩也。 毒虫不螫其始生之色而喻之也。又曰:上一赤子乃泥丸,天帝之名也。素抱内蕴,真纯不散,若婴儿之未孩也。 毒虫不螫,猛兽不据,攫鸟不搏。 林氏曰:毒虫不螫,猛兽不据,攫鸟不搏,言物不能伤之也,亦入水不濡,入火不热之意。○吴氏曰:毒虫,蜂虿之属,以尾端肆毒曰螫,猛兽,虎豹之属,以爪足拏按曰据,攫鸟,鹰隼之属,以翼距击夺曰搏。○董氏曰:全天之人,物无害者。○何氏曰:含蓄厚德,不露于外,与物两无伤阂,而物亦无得而伤之。○李氏曰:赤子之心纯,无害於物,物亦不能害。○苏氏曰:无心之人物无与敌,曷由而伤之。○吕氏曰:至人其神全,其道大,透金贯石,坐在立亡,驱龙伏虎,役鬼制魔,毒虫不敢肆其口尾,猛兽无所施其爪牙,攫鸟与敌,曷由而伤之。○吕氏曰:至人其神全,其道大,透金贯石,坐在立亡,驱龙伏虎,役鬼制魔,毒虫不敢肆其口尾,猛兽无所施其爪牙,攫鸟不能逞其爪距。 骨弱筋柔而握固,未知牝牡之合而□作,精之至也。终日号而廙不嘎,和之至也。 林氏曰:赤子骨至弱,其筋至柔,而手之所握甚固,未知有雌雄之事而其□亦作者,精气盛也。□,赤子之命元也。终日虽号而其嗌不嗄者,心无喜怒,气本和也。嗌,咽喉也。嗄,气逆也。赤子纯一专固,故能如此。而有道者亦然,只是不动心也。○何氏曰:□,赤子阴也。人之初生,筋骨未劳,柔软绰约,所握坚固,而阴阳作怒,非知牝牡之欲,以其亦然,只是不动心也。○何氏曰:□,赤子阴也。人之初生,筋骨未劳,柔软绰约,所握坚固,而阴阳作怒,非知牝牡之欲,以其精气之盛也。而有德者固精固气固神,积至易筋易骨易形者似之。嗄,声破也,号虽终日而声不破,以其和气之全也。而有德者敬之不喜,侮之不怒,同乎天和者似之。○李氏曰:不知有男女之别,其□亦作,精气全也。虽作而无心,故能全其至精,终日号而其声不变,冲和所至也,修身以此,纯全其本,然是谓含德之厚也。 知和曰常,知常曰明,益生曰祥,心使气曰强。 林氏曰:和者纯气之守也,知此至和之理,则可以常久而不易也。知此常久之理,,知常曰明,益生曰祥,心使气曰强。 林氏曰:和者纯气之守也,知此至和之理,则可以常久而不易也。知此常久之理,可谓明於道矣。生不可益强,求益之则为殃矣。祥,祆也,故曰益生曰祥。传曰:是何祥也,即此祥字之意。以心使气,是志动气也。强者暴也,暴则非道矣,故曰心使气曰强。○何氏曰:日夜无隙,而与物为春,何常如之,和也。是非美恶,不藏灵府,何明如之,常也。人生有涯,欲益反狈,惠子曰:不益生何以有身,《庄子》曰:言人不以好恶内伤其身,常因自然,而不益生。又曰:过度,益也。故曰无以生为者,乃贤於贵生。如余食赘行,则为妖为孽之祥矣。志,气之师,气,体之充,如心使气,则气反动心,为猛为隘之强矣。○吕氏曰:和之为言,以直自养,初无趋蹙谬戾如余食赘行,则为妖为孽之祥矣。志,气之师,气,体之充,如心使气,则气反动心,为猛为隘之强矣。○吕氏曰:和之为言,以直自养,初无趋蹙谬戾之患,岂为自暴而失其常哉。既知其和,终不失其所守,静一而不变,与天地为常,既知常道,朝彻见独,无古无今,明白四达,与日月参光。故曰知和曰常,知常曰明。然而谓之神者,宁不为生之所累,若非理益之,必至凶祥,故有丧於执迷。谓之气者,宁不为心所使,气血妄作,强暴滋甚,故溺於邪僻。若夫生生之厚,妄念不断,弗知常道,凶祥至矣。专气至柔,摄生之理,今反为心所使役,其气勇暴,岂道哉。惟知道者常因自然而不益生也。 物壮则老,谓之不之厚,妄念不断,弗知常道,凶祥至矣。专气至柔,摄生之理,今反为心所使役,其气勇暴,岂道哉。惟知道者常因自然而不益生也。 物壮则老,谓之不道,不道早已。 林氏曰:早已,速已之而弗为也。已者止也。○吕氏曰:物之壮者必至於老,心之强者必至於凶,且道以柔弱含德为用,今以壮强为心,谓之不道,故不道者早亡而已。夫人万物中最灵者,有生则有少,有少则有壮,有壮则有老,有老则有死,此皆不知道而不能逃於造化之内者也。倘能夺天地之机,达阴阳还返之妙,则形可以不生,神可以不化,我命在我,不属天地矣。如其未达,非欲壮不得不壮,故曰物壮则老,是谓不道,不道早已。○吴氏生,神可以不化,我命在我,不属天地矣。如其未达,非欲壮不得不壮,故曰物壮则老,是谓不道,不道早已。○吴氏曰:常如赤子,则不壮矣,恶乎老,既不老,恶乎已。○何氏曰:善养德者,辩之在早,素不以事变滑其和,故德全而神不亏,所以为含德之厚也,不见少壮老之气有三变者此也。 第五十六章 知者不言,言者不知。塞其兑,闭其门,挫其锐,解其纷,和其光,同其尘,是谓玄同。 林氏曰:知者不言二言者不知,谓道不容言也。必塞兑闭门,而藏之於密,必挫其锐而磨砻之,使无圭角,必解其纷而调理之,使不紊乱,必和光同尘而自不眩露,此所谓至玄至妙,同然而然之理也。何氏曰:知道磨砻之,使无圭角,必解其纷而调理之,使不紊乱,必和光同尘而自不眩露,此所谓至玄至妙,同然而然之理也。何氏曰:知道易,勿言难,知而不言,所以天也。知而言之,所以人也,古之人天而不人,道本自然,行者能得,闻者能言,知道者以道深妙故不言,昧道者以道相烦故不知。塞其兑者悦不以道不悦也,闭其门者由不以道不由也。挫其锐者破险峻之圭角也,解其纷者离邪见之缠网也,和其光者守智如愚也,同其尘者忘机混迹也。此六者必以其道,则行真也,闭其门者由不以道不由也。挫其锐者破险峻之圭角也,解其纷者离邪见之缠网也,和其光者守智如愚也,同其尘者忘机混迹也。此六者必以其道,则行真归身,能通其玄德,与天为徒,故曰玄同。○吕氏曰:天地有大美而不言,四时有明法而不议,盖道存乎默,贵乎简,默而辩简而当,《庄子》曰:知之者终日言而未尝言,不知者终日言而未尝知,至人知道以心而不以辩,贵行而不贵言,谈道者以辩而不以心,丧道而不丧说,倘然而啮缺之问王倪,四问而四不知,乃真知也。故曰知者不言,言者不知,至人能塞其兑,收视返听,况默守神谈道者以辩而不以心,丧道而不丧说,倘然而啮缺之问王倪,四问而四不知,乃真知也。故曰知者不言,言者不知,至人能塞其兑,收视返听,况默守神,胎仙泰定矣。能闭乎门,退藏於密,祸患不能入,邪气不得袭矣。能挫乎锐则以深为跟,刚强息矣,能解其纷则以约为纪,繁乱除矣。能和其光则不眩耀,能同其尘则不与物竞,夫如是则复於至幽,归乎至一,至幽谓之玄,至一谓之同,无可无不可矣。○李氏曰:多言获利,不如默而无害也。 故不可得而亲,不可得而疏。不可得而利,不可得而害。不可得而贵,不可得而贱。故为天下贵。 林氏曰:有此玄同之道,则天下不可得而亲,不可得而疏,言其超出於亲疏利害贵贱之外,此道之所以为天下贵也。○吕氏曰:造道之微,不与阴而疏,言其超出於亲疏利害贵贱之外,此道之所以为天下贵也。○吕氏曰:造道之微,不与阴阳为用,超於形数之外,上与造化者游,下与外死生无终始者友,无外於物,安能亲也。无求其恶,安能疏也。无求於用,利莫侵也。无心於物,害莫及也。高爵厚禄,不足动其心,是不以荣为贵也。蒙垢受耻,不足移其志,是不以污为贱也。可以存生,可以养形,所谓道之至高至极,举天下不可得而及之。○吴氏曰:我既玄同,则不能亲疏利害贵贱我矣。恩虽如父母,而人与之相忘,不可得而亲也。邈然如途人,而人不认相远,不可得而疏也。亲疏利害贵贱我矣。恩虽如父母,而人与之相忘,不可得而亲也。邈然如途人,而人不认相远,不可得而疏也。外名位货财,而人莫能相益,不可得而利也。外死生祸福,而人莫能相损不可得而害也。势虽如君长,而人与之相狎,不可得而贵也。眇然如匹夫,而人莫能相慢,不可得而贱也。凡此六者,人所不能,而己独能之,故为天下之最贵也。 第五十七章 以正治国,以奇用兵,以无事取天下。吾何以知其然哉?以此。 吕氏曰:正者道之常也,奇者道之变也,无事者道之真也,以正教为治,则足以尽为政之道,以奇谋用兵,则足以应一时之变。古之圣人,立可久可大之基,初非所以用兵为心也,不得已而后有征伐之事,故以治为正,以兵为奇也。天下神器不可为也,为者败之,执者失之,取天下常以,立可久可大之基,初非所以用兵为心也,不得已而后有征伐之事,故以治为正,以兵为奇也。天下神器不可为也,为者败之,执者失之,取天下常以无事,及其有事,不足以取天下,惟体道者恬然无事,顺物自然,何思何虑,虽不取天下而天下自归之矣。以己言之,心平志定,气血和畅,则外魔不侵,自然神宇泰定,天光秀发,亦犹治国之行其道,则边境宁谧也。若乃六贼未除,七情未去,则吾身之患犹在,方其尘念一起,业火自焚,是不得已之时也?强兵不得以不用杀机不得以不发,亦犹四夷八蛮交侵中国,而六军七情未去,则吾身之患犹在,方其尘念一起,业火自焚,是不得已之时也?强兵不得以不用杀机不得以不发,亦犹四夷八蛮交侵中国,而六军之师有不能自已者矣,故曰以正治国,以奇用兵,以无事取天下,且何以知天人之意哉,盖以治国用兵取天下之事而见之也。○吴氏曰:正者法制禁令,正其不正之谓,管商之徒以正治国者也。帝王之治国,则以修身齐家为本,而不恃法制禁令以为正,奇者权谋诡诈,谲而不正之谓,孙吴之徒,以奇用兵者也。帝王之用兵则以吊民伐罪为心,而不尚权谋诡诈以为奇,故奇者,孙吴之徒,以奇用兵者也。帝王之用兵则以吊民伐罪为心,而不尚权谋诡诈以为奇,故奇者仅可施之於用兵,而不可以治国,正者仅可施之於治国,而不可以治天下。无事者,三皇无为之治也,如天不言而四时行,百物生,不期人之服从,而天下无不服从,故惟无事者可以取天下也。○林氏曰:以正治国,言治国必有政事,以奇用兵.,用兵则必须诈术,二者皆为有心,无为而为,则可以得天下之心,故曰以无事取天下,吾何知其有心之不可,而无心之为可,以此道也。 夫天下多忌讳,而民弥贫。人多利器,国家滋昏。民多伎巧,奇物滋起。法令滋彰,盗贼多有。 吕氏曰:夫生民之所以贫富寿夭,付之自尔,未尝容心於其间,苟禁网繁密,民多避忌,不敢云为,举措失业,日生民之所以贫富寿夭,付之自尔,未尝容心於其间,苟禁网繁密,民多避忌,不敢云为,举措失业,日愈贫穷矣。故至人之接物,以无事为真定,以有事为应迹,有事无事,常在定中,若处喧而无恶,涉事而无恼,此为真定,以无事无念为常也。且心犹君也,炁犹民也,多忌则心神不安,元炁雕零矣,故曰天下多忌讳,而民弥贫。夫利器者,权也,权势,人主之斧斤,人臣岂得而用之哉。且一人之器,天下皆得而用之,是倒持太阿而授之以柄也。权既下移,则国家昏乱矣。其於己也,心不能纯一,反为七情六欲之所制,神明安得而不昏浊矣。故曰人多利器,国家滋昏。夫技巧者,工妙也,人君不能无为,志在六欲之所制,神明安得而不昏浊矣。故曰人多利器,国家滋昏。夫技巧者,工妙也,人君不能无为,志在淫奢,则民为雕琢服玩金玉奇怪之物,苟容取媚,投其所欲矣。其於己也,不能绝物而溺於澴玩好,日已滋深,则大朴耗散,去道远矣。故曰人多技巧,奇物滋起。夫法令者刑教也,克核太至,严威酷烈,而舞文弄法奸宄之吏得以滋其恶,民不胜其弊,小则盗财,大则盗国矣。其於己也,拘於小法,执着傍门,外境滋夺,心灵撄乱,盗我之真,贼我之性者,纷如也,故曰法令滋彰,盗贼多有。○何氏曰:天下多忌讳,而民弥贫,言国之多制也,山泽各有守,关市各有征,微敛无度,民人苦病,如晏子所对齐侯者,触手犯禁,民不堪命,岂非忌讳多而弥贫乎,忌讳少则安业矣。经曰:国之利器,不可以示人,若民多,触手犯禁,民不堪命,岂非忌讳多而弥贫乎,忌讳少则安业矣。经曰:国之利器,不可以示人,若民多利器,则国家滋昏,虑其窃上之机权也。故曰工无淫巧,其器完而不饰,若人多技巧,奇物滋起,虑其败俗之朴素也。上无苛令,其事任而不扰,若网密文峻,奸宄不胜,则流为盗贼之归者,虑其法令之过也,然后益知我无为而民自化等语,古圣人不我欺也。○李氏曰日:多忌讳,多利器,多技巧,多法令,皆不正也,上无忌讳则民裕,绝槽谋则民化,薄税敛则民富,道之以德则民朴。 故圣人云:我无为而民自化,我好静而民自正,我无事而民自富,我无欲而民自朴。 吕氏曰:老君为万教之祖,犹举故圣人云,守之以谦,不敢自陈也,人云:我无为而民自化,我好静而民自正,我无事而民自富,我无欲而民自朴。 吕氏曰:老君为万教之祖,犹举故圣人云,守之以谦,不敢自陈也,故有国有民,无所制作,未尝不以无为为治,则民遂其生,庶俗自化矣。夫炼真之士,以我为神,以民为炁,神凝无为,元气自化为液,液自化为血,血自化为筋,筋自化为骨,骨自化为髓,髓自化为精,精自化为玄珠,玄珠自化为金丹。《阴符经》所谓万化生乎身是也。故曰我无为而民自化,节用爱人,去华务实,未尝不以俭啬为先,则民厚其业,家自富已。炼真之士,常无欲则息长,息长则炁满於三爱人,去华务实,未尝不以俭啬为先,则民厚其业,家自富已。炼真之士,常无欲则息长,息长则炁满於三田之内,故曰我无事而民自富。安静不言,淡泊自守,未尝不以厚本为意,则民抱天全,其俗纯正矣。夫人神躁动,则炁息粗骤,神宁谧则百关调畅,元气自正矣,故曰我好静而民自正。无欲冲虚,崇本弃末,未尝不以简要为务,则民夸企,其性自朴矣。炼真之士,元神恬寂,欲念不生,炁炼真凝,成胎结象,故曰我无欲而民自朴。○何氏曰:.我无为而民自化,若为者败之,民反不化矣。我好静而民自正,若动而失之,民反不正矣。我无事而民自富,若多争则多患,民反不富矣。我无欲而民自朴,若多欲则多累,民反不朴矣。此至治之要道也。昔盖公善治黄老,所与曹参言若多争则多患,民反不富矣。我无欲而民自朴,若多欲则多累,民反不朴矣。此至治之要道也。昔盖公善治黄老,所与曹参言者,惟治道贵清静而民自定,推此类具言之,曹参得其术,相齐国九年,大治。○李氏曰:无为无欲,无事好静,皆正也。以此治国,则海晏河清,以此行道,则道泰时康,以此修身,则气固神凝,一人正,万人皆正,一心正,万化皆正,一身正,万事皆正,正之义大矣哉。 第五十八章 政闷闷,其民淳淳。其政察察,其民缺。福兮祸所倚,祸兮福所伏,孰知极?其无正邪,正复为奇,善复为诙。民之迷,其日固已久矣。 林氏曰:闷闷者,不其政察察,其民缺。福兮祸所倚,祸兮福所伏,孰知极?其无正邪,正复为奇,善复为诙。民之迷,其日固已久矣。 林氏曰:闷闷者,不作聪明也。察察者,烦碎也。淳淳,自乐也。缺缺,不足也。此亦有心则为害,无心则自治之意。祸福无常,更相倚伏,孰知其所极止,正者定也,其无正耶,言倚伏无穷,不可得而定也。天下之事,奇或为正,正或为奇,善或为祆,訞或为善,利害是非,莫不皆然,此亦祸福倚伏之意。世人迷而不知,徒分奇正,徒分訞善,其迷盖非一日矣。○李氏曰:上章无为无事,使民自化,宽大之治也。故次之以其政徒分訞善,其迷盖非一日矣。○李氏曰:上章无为无事,使民自化,宽大之治也。故次之以其政闷闷,是谓上宽裕则民纯实,上多事则民昏暴。闷闷,宽也,察察,谨也,宽则得众,尽法无民,祸福自倚,正奇相待,善訞相反,理之然也,可不戒诸?修福不如避祸,用正不若闲邪,正虽为善,苟自矜为奇德,则反为訞,正之为正,斯不正矣。善之为善,斯不善矣。○吕氏曰:古之人体天之行,政教宽大,任物自然,常若闷闷,故其俗淳朴,修真之士,抱神溟涬,漠然宽大,忘乎视听,无所分别,其息深深淳淳,仙道得成矣。故曰其政闷闷,其民淳淳。后世有为之君,其政峻急,以法绳人,察见渊渔,犹以为未至,民之失性,莫甚於此,由是动触禁网,雕弊离散,风俗日益衰矣闷,其民淳淳。后世有为之君,其政峻急,以法绳人,察见渊渔,犹以为未至,民之失性,莫甚於此,由是动触禁网,雕弊离散,风俗日益衰矣。末学初真之士,未造道妙,真炁不凝,役心运思於事物之中,专务苛察,崇尚机变,以是而治身,则缺缺然喘息粗急,真元离体,非养生之道也。故曰其政察察,其民缺缺。且治乱之首,祸福之源,自古有之,亦由人所召。夫祸之藏於福中也,福至于极,若不能谦抑只畏,而乃妄自骄奢,未有不为祸者矣。福之隐於祸内也,若处患难之中,顿改前非,内自修省,则秘反为福矣。天地之道有休否,日月之运有亏盈,此倚伏之数,祸福相因,莫知祸内也,若处患难之中,顿改前非,内自修省,则秘反为福矣。天地之道有休否,日月之运有亏盈,此倚伏之数,祸福相因,莫知纪极也。有天下者,普未若守之以清静,任其自然,不利货财,不乐寿,不荣通,不丑穷,如是则祸福倚伏,何有於我哉。造真之士,不为福先,不为祸始,物我兼忘,岂祸福倚伏之可累乎。故曰福兮祸所倚,祸兮福所伏,孰知其极,阴阳之运,生杀系焉,动静之间,吉凶倚焉,邪之与正,善之与訞,孰能定之哉。正则正道也,奇则邪径也,善则善性也,祆则异类也。本乎一心,流而为四,非一炁之正也。其正之者,必圣人有心正之,恢谲诡怪,反害于正,有心为正,祆祥变异,反害乎善。善祆奇正,迭相用事,民性不一,处於邪正之者,必圣人有心正之,恢谲诡怪,反害于正,有心为正,祆祥变异,反害乎善。善祆奇正,迭相用事,民性不一,处於邪正之间,迷惑其所由来久矣。譬诸中下之士,有闻道者,方且隙然生善之一念,而无卓然独立之定力,乃惑於见闻,一弹指间,妄念忽起,而正复化为奇,怪善复化为訞邪,庄圣所谓神奇复化臭腐是也。圣智难知,鬼神莫识,况常流乎。故人迷妄,其来久矣,岂独今哉。故曰其无正邪,正复为奇,善复为訞,民之迷,其日固已久矣。 是以圣人方而不割,廉而不刿,直而不肆,光而不耀。 何氏曰:割,害,刿,伤也。方则易割,康则易刿,吾以方以廉,已久矣。 是以圣人方而不割,廉而不刿,直而不肆,光而不耀。 何氏曰:割,害,刿,伤也。方则易割,康则易刿,吾以方以廉,以身率民,使化而遂,以此为害人伤人之事,有不为也。肆,逞,耀,眩也,直则易肆,光则易耀,吾以直以光,以道示民,使化而遂,以此为自逞自眩之事,有不为也。康而不剧,古全句,见《聘义》经注甚明,改刿作秽者,非是。《庄子》廉刿雕琢,字义相近。○董氏曰:行方而德圆,故无割截之迷,刿,伤害也,清而容物,故不刿。肆,布列也。大直若屈而不肆,光而不耀者,复归其明也。此四者皆闷闷政也。盖圣人惟恬淡无为,而方廉直光之用,整然於其中,而人不知,使天下各安其性命之情,而不陷於一偏,所以无割刿肆耀之过,而祸福何有哉。 第五十九章廉直光之用,整然於其中,而人不知,使天下各安其性命之情,而不陷於一偏,所以无割刿肆耀之过,而祸福何有哉。 第五十九章 治人事天,莫若啬。 吕氏曰:圣人之治,无为无事,省财节用,则仓库充实,民康俗阜,然后保精爱神,齐心洁己,以昭祀上帝,则人神皆和矣。且夫聪明睿智,动静思虑,是其心内受用者,屈伸俯仰,貌像声色,是吾身外受用者,两者交通,吻然契合,要在各得其宜,此啬之为义也。修诸内者以修身为治人,治自己之人也。以养元为事天,事自已之天也。天则脑宫是矣,纯阳赫赫,在乎上九,天之上无阴也,自玉京关之上皆天也。啬者保爱也,爱视则天则脑宫是矣,纯阳赫赫,在乎上九,天之上无阴也,自玉京关之上皆天也。啬者保爱也,爱视则养神,爱听则养虚,爱言则养气,爱息则养和,爱脑则养血,故曰治人事天,莫若啬。○何氏曰:有国者处天人之际,凡所以上事天,下治人,多求之外,而不求之身,太史公以道为六家首,专取其精神专一,谓之大道,其曰动合无形,则与天符合者,此精神也。曰赡足万物则使民赡给者,亦此精神也。又曰:凡人所生者神也,所托者形也,精太用则竭,神太用则疲,精神离则死,故圣人重之。夫重之即啬之之说。啬者,吝惜之至也,圣人守内不守外,夫曰节曰爱曰守,皆啬之意也。不啬口则多言损气,五味厉爽,不啬耳目则五声乱耳,五色乱目,如曰快其情者,疲其神,其啬也哉。啬精啬气啬神,此道上可宾九清,下可福群生。○吴氏。不啬口则多言损气,五味厉爽,不啬耳目则五声乱耳,五色乱目,如曰快其情者,疲其神,其啬也哉。啬精啬气啬神,此道上可宾九清,下可福群生。○吴氏曰:音也者,留形惜气之要卫也。○李氏曰:治人事天,莫若从俭,以国言之,省刑罚,薄税敛,以身言之也,省言语,节饮食,以心言之,省思虑,绝视听,存其心,养其性,可以事天也。 夫惟啬,是谓早复。早复谓之重积德。重积德则无不克。无不克则莫知其极。莫知其极,可以有国。 吕氏曰:且啬者爱育精神,勤俭有常,如性无易,如德不迁,省费储用,自足俭啬,而智恬交养,情不外荡,性自内复,若夫爱其形,保其神,贵其气,固其根,精神脑血,不致耗散,早得复本还费储用,自足俭啬,而智恬交养,情不外荡,性自内复,若夫爱其形,保其神,贵其气,固其根,精神脑血,不致耗散,早得复本还元,故曰夫惟啬,是谓早复。夫节俭理民,爱啬其神以上心,德之一也。服从于道,积而弥新,人皆和悦,德之二也。有一有二,德之重也。修之内者,早能啬复,则气柔和,万神安畅,复我本来,不随物转,深矣远矣,故曰早复。谓之重积德,然重积者,克己复礼,修道以仁,未尝眩鬻,天人信顺,无一物敢违,是以四方向慕,无不克服矣。故曰重积德则无不克,而无不克者,万物归化,道德无穷,何人信顺,无一物敢违,是以四方向慕,无不克服矣。故曰重积德则无不克,而无不克者,万物归化,道德无穷,何往不通,内炼之士,大德有容,以其不争,奚往不克,至一不逆,真常不变,参万岁而不老,岂知其极,故曰无不克,则莫知其极。夫其极之莫知,后其身而身先,天下乐推而不厌,被尧之仁,乐尧之化,其国可保而有余裕矣。内炼之士,体道之无穷,毓德之无极,国可以有者,喻乎身可以存也,故曰莫知其极,可以有国。○何氏曰:重积德,则积水成海,积气成神也。无不克则应物变化,无所不宜也。莫知其极,乃合大道,混混溟溟也,为国者果能此道,亦可以有其国而德,则积水成海,积气成神也。无不克则应物变化,无所不宜也。莫知其极,乃合大道,混混溟溟也,为国者果能此道,亦可以有其国而久安矣。○林氏曰:早复者言啬则归复於根,返本还元也。德至此则愈积,而愈盛矣。重,愈积之意也。 有国之母,可以长久。是谓深根固蒂,长生久视之道也。 吕氏曰:始也修性以反德,今也积德而入道。为有国之母也,则可以茂养百姓,福祚社稷,亘万古之长久矣。喻之於身,有国之母者气也,形为受气之本,气是有形之根,气因神识而生,形乃因气而立,故伏羲得之以袭气母,盖神是气之子,而气是神之母也。形不得气,无因而成,气不治神识而生,形乃因气而立,故伏羲得之以袭气母,盖神是气之子,而气是神之母也。形不得气,无因而成,气不治形,将何为主。气散则身谢,气在则身存且久也,故曰有国之母,可以长久。积德之君,治人事天,厚国养民者,植根於无为,固蒂於清静,社稷绵远,故谓之长生。临御常照,故谓之久视。己之根者脑也,蒂者脐也,深根运元气以补脑也,仙谚云:欲得不老,还精补脑。然后密枢机,闭欲户,藏元精,於杳冥之府,结胎息於丹元之宫,上赤下黑,左青右白,中央黄晕之间,乃黄庭结宝之处,正当脐间,是谓固蒂也。今欲修长生,当先固蒂,呼吸太和,返神服气,胎息绵绵,伏住脐间,长生与天地为常,久视与日月参光矣。仙谚曰:欲得长生,先须久视,久视者,内视也。○林氏曰:此章以治国喻养生长生与天地为常,久视与日月参光矣。仙谚曰:欲得长生,先须久视,久视者,内视也。○林氏曰:此章以治国喻养生也。养生而能啬,则可以深其根,固其蒂,可以长生,可以久视也。○苏氏曰:以啬治人则可以有国,以啬事天则深根固蒂,古之圣人,保其性命之常,不以外耗内,则根深蒂固,而不可拔,虽长生久视可也。盖治人事天,虽有内外之异,而莫若啬一也。 第六十章 治大国,若烹小鲜。 吕氏曰:治大国者,不可烦,烦则民乱,烹小鲜者,不可扰,扰则鱼烂。故善治国者,若烹肤寸之鱼,调其水火,使之自熟,则鱼可全。若乃扰之则鱼伤,鱼伤则糜烂於釜矣。善治民者和其政教,使其自得,其民自安,若乃扰之则民伤,民伤则溃於国矣。是以治道贵清静,国以民为本,身以气为本,爱民治国,则国昌,爱气治身则身久,故设此喻。爱民惜气之法,如烹小鲜不可搅,贵清静,国以民为本,身以气为本,爱民治国,则国昌,爱气治身则身久,故设此喻。爱民惜气之法,如烹小鲜不可搅,扰动则耗废矣。○李氏曰:以正治国,其政闷闷,治人事天,皆治国之义。小鲜者,细小之鱼也。譬以烹鲜,挠之则糜,言平治天下,挠之则乱也。○林氏曰:烹小鲜者,搅之则碎,治国者扰之则乱,清静无为,安静不扰,此治国之道也。 以道莅天下,其鬼不神。 吕氏曰:圣人神明,万物之主也,不得已而临莅天下,以无为之道治之,故风雨时若,水旱不作,人心冲和,鬼神咸服於明德,鬼既安於幽趣,不敢出其灵响,现其神变矣。以道治一身之天下者,智恬交养,神宇泰定,天光内发,祆气沦灭,作,人心冲和,鬼神咸服於明德,鬼既安於幽趣,不敢出其灵响,现其神变矣。以道治一身之天下者,智恬交养,神宇泰定,天光内发,祆气沦灭,邪鬼岂敢现其神变哉。○吴氏曰:莅,临也,鬼谓天地之气,神灵,怪也。人之气与天地之气通为一,有道之主,以道莅临天下者,简静而治,不扰动以伤害其民,故民气和平,充塞两间,相为感应,而天地之气无或乖戾,故其鬼不为灵怪,以兴灾也。○何氏曰:夫以道莅天下,神民安之,《庄子》圣人得已而临往天下,莫若无为,无为则人安其性命之情,莫之为而常自然,万物莫能为之害也。○河上公以道德居位治天下,则鬼不敢现其精神以犯人也。 非其鬼不神,其神不伤人。非其神不伤人,圣人亦不伤人。 吕氏曰:非其鬼无神变灵响,盖圣人守其常位,宜其幽赞天地之精神以犯人也。 非其鬼不神,其神不伤人。非其神不伤人,圣人亦不伤人。 吕氏曰:非其鬼无神变灵响,盖圣人守其常位,宜其幽赞天地之大美,戬助协顺,惟福是宜,非特鬼不敢神,神亦不敢妄肆妖祸,伤吾之民矣。且有道之士,非其鬼无神变,以其不能伤犯自然之人也。故曰非其鬼不神,其神不伤人。神既安於正直,非不伤害於民,以其服圣人之明德,自处幽暗,而不敢示其怪变尔。圣人悯一夫之失所,未尝不思所以救之之力,父临子育,虽紬绎帡幪,保惜之不暇,何伤之有。喻於人得道自然,非独神明不敢犯,圣人亦不伤之也。圣人方且尊道贵德,岂伤於有道之民哉。故曰非其神不伤人,圣人亦不伤人。○吴氏曰:鬼之所以不灵怪者,非不灵怪也,虽能灵怪而不为妖灾以伤害人也。又谓鬼之灵怪,所以不伤人者,非自能如此也神不伤人,圣人亦不伤人。○吴氏曰:鬼之所以不灵怪者,非不灵怪也,虽能灵怪而不为妖灾以伤害人也。又谓鬼之灵怪,所以不伤人者,非自能如此也。以圣人能使民气和平而不伤天地之气,故天地之气亦和平而不伤害人也。曰鬼曰神,皆天地之气,名二而实一。○河上公曰:其鬼非无精神也,不能伤自然之人也。 夫两不相伤,故德交归焉。 吕氏曰:人得治於阳,鬼得治於阴,人得全性命,鬼得全至神,两者交悦无所伤焉,遂至天清地宁,阴阳调泰,年谷常丰,物无札伤,国无疵疠,鬼无灵响,其德交归之矣。○林氏曰:幽则为阴阳,明则为圣治,此两者自不相伤,则其德皆归之,言天地得其自然之道,无札伤,国无疵疠,鬼无灵响,其德交归之矣。○林氏曰:幽则为阴阳,明则为圣治,此两者自不相伤,则其德皆归之,言天地得其自然之道,圣人亦得自然之道,各有其德而不相侵越,故曰交归焉。不相伤,不相侵也。此章先顿一句,以言不扰之意,既提起一句如此,下面却言三才之道,皆是不扰而已。以道莅天下,此天下字包三才而言之。凡在太虚之下,临之以道,天则职覆,地则职载,圣人则职教,三者各职其职,而不相侵越,则皆得其道矣。○河上公:鬼与圣人俱两不相伤也。夫两不相伤,人得治於阳,鬼得治於阴,人得全其性命,鬼得保其精神,故德交归焉。○何氏曰:古之人在混茫之中,与一世俱两不相伤也。夫两不相伤,人得治於阳,鬼得治於阴,人得全其性命,鬼得保其精神,故德交归焉。○何氏曰:古之人在混茫之中,与一世而澹漠焉,当是时,阴阳知静,鬼神不扰,四时得节,万物不伤,群生不夭,人虽有知,无所用之,是之谓至一,莫之为而常自然,此也。 第六十一章 大国者下流,天下之交,天下之牝。牝常以静胜牡,以静为下。 林氏曰:借大国小国之得所欲,以喻知道之人宜谦宜静,非教人自下以取胜也。三代而下,世有取国之事,故因其所见,以为喻尔。下流者自处於卑下也,大国之人,能自卑下,则可以合天地之交,譬如牝者以静而胜其牡也。自下者以静为道,故曰以静为下。○吕氏曰:江海所以能为百处於卑下也,大国之人,能自卑下,则可以合天地之交,譬如牝者以静而胜其牡也。自下者以静为道,故曰以静为下。○吕氏曰:江海所以能为百谷王者,以其善下之也。百川朝宗,亦犹大国能自下,无不包容,则民交趋而会之矣。传曰:天地交,万物生,人道交,功勋成,此之谓与。一身之设,一国之象也。忘其身则百骸理,虚其心则和气归,虚无者圣人之所居,可谓大国矣。以其不争,故天下莫能与之争。至於万物之精华,交而会之,犹众水之趋下流也。故曰大国者下流。天下之交圣人之所居,可谓大国矣。以其不争,故天下莫能与之争。至於万物之精华,交而会之,犹众水之趋下流也。故曰大国者下流。天下之交,天下之牝者,初不容心於胜,惟其静,是以常胜,以胜为下,故天下之交归焉。牝静牡动,柔静刚动也。刚为柔所制,动为静所伏,经曰:知其雄,守其雌,为天下溪,此实用谦下之德,有国有民,故无往而不克也,取之己也。天一生水,在人为精,地二生火,在人为神,神者阳中之阴,故谓之雌,亦天下之牝也。知雄守雌,专气致柔,以阴炼阳,为神机妙用也,故牝常以静胜焉。静则群动趋也,下则众齐赴之,此修真之要也。 故大国以下小国,则取小国。小国以下大国,则取大国。或下以取,或下而取。 林氏曰:以大取小曰以取,以小取大曰而取,此两句文字亦奇特。○吕氏曰:以大事小,。 林氏曰:以大取小曰以取,以小取大曰而取,此两句文字亦奇特。○吕氏曰:以大事小,唯仁者能之。以小事大,唯智者能之。以大事小者,乐天者也。以小事大者,畏天者也。乐天者知天命,畏天者保其身。○吴氏曰:大国本在小国之上者,不恃其尊而谦降以下小国,则能致小国之乐附。小国素在大国之下者,甘处於卑而俯仰以下大国,则能得大国之见容。下以取,谓大国能下以取小国之乐附,下而取,谓小国能下而取大国之见容也。○何氏 曰:。下以取,谓大国能下以取小国之乐附,下而取,谓小国能下而取大国之见容也。○何氏 曰:大国以下小国,如汤事葛,文王事昆夷。小国以下大国,如太王事獯鬻,句践事吴之类。○李氏曰:上以下下下,下以下顺上,上逊下顺,德交归焉。修身以此,心愈下而道愈高,身愈退而德逾进。 大国不过欲兼畜人,小国不过欲入事人。夫两者各得其所欲,故大者宜为下。 林氏曰:大国之意,不过欲兼畜天下之人,小国之意,不过欲镌刺入求於人,二者皆非自事人。夫两者各得其所欲,故大者宜为下。 林氏曰:大国之意,不过欲兼畜天下之人,小国之意,不过欲镌刺入求於人,二者皆非自下不可,惟能自下,则两者各得其欲,然则知道之大者,必以谦下为宜矣。黄茂林解云:此一章全是借物以明道,此语最的当。○吴氏曰:大国之下小国一者,欲兼畜小国而已,小国之下大国一者,欲入事大国而已,两者皆能下,一则大小各得其所欲,然小者素在人一下,不患其不能下,大者非在人下,或恐其不能,故专言大者宜为下。○吕氏曰:大国以下小国者,不过欲兼并畜聚小国之众,为其君长尔。小国以下大国者,不过尽礼以敬事大国,资为援助尔。然小大各当其大国以下小国者,不过欲兼并畜聚小国之众,为其君长尔。小国以下大国者,不过尽礼以敬事大国,资为援助尔。然小大各当其分,互有所持,不相侵挠,安其居,乐其俗,而小国柔服,理之常也。大国谦下,故宜曲而下全之,使可小可大,所以致天下之交也。○何氏曰:此章首言大国者下流,末言大者宜为下,中间虽合大国小国并言,而先后惟主於大国而言者,小者易为下,此不待教,大者易以盈,难为下,虽教未必行,故再三言之,与《易》同道也。 第六十二章 道者万物之奥。善人之宝,不善人之所保。 何氏曰:道者陶治万物,修治无形,寂然不动,大道混冥,深阔广大,不可为外,析毫剖芒,不可为内,此所谓物之奥也。如保。 何氏曰:道者陶治万物,修治无形,寂然不动,大道混冥,深阔广大,不可为外,析毫剖芒,不可为内,此所谓物之奥也。如屋之堂奥,非造次所得见,《庄子》道者万物所共由,故此章先曰宝,后曰贵也。道不远人,人自远道,虽有善不善之判,而不善人之所保,亦隐然藉此道以为安也。○吴氏曰:万物之奥,谓万物之尊贵者,奥,室西南隅也,尊者所居,故奥为贵。道之尊贵,犹奥也。宝谓善人所重,善人向道而进修,则可以取重於人,故曰善人之宝,不善人向道而改悔,亦可自保其身,故曰不善人之所保。 美言可以市,尊行可以加人。人之不善,何弃之有。故立天子,置三公,虽有拱璧以先驷马,不如坐进此道。 李氏曰:美言可以市,足以悦众,尊行可以加人,足以出尊行可以加人。人之不善,何弃之有。故立天子,置三公,虽有拱璧以先驷马,不如坐进此道。 李氏曰:美言可以市,足以悦众,尊行可以加人,足以出众也。人之不善,我亦善之,何弃之有。立天子置三公,作之君,作之师,教化下民,使不善者从其化。拱璧驷马,不足为贵,不如坐进此道,修己以安百姓,先之以敬让而民不争,陈之以德义而民兴行,示之以好恶而民知禁,是以圣人常善救人,故无弃人。○柴氏曰:道味有益,如宝入市,故曰美言可以市,德重无不服,故曰尊行可以加人。人之不善,何弃之有,教以化之,何敢弃之。故立天子置三公,所以辅行此道也。○吴氏曰:善人以道而取重於人言可以市,德重无不服,故曰尊行可以加人。人之不善,何弃之有,教以化之,何敢弃之。故立天子置三公,所以辅行此道也。○吴氏曰:善人以道而取重於人者,其嘉言可爱,如美物可鬻於市,其卓行可宗,可以高出众人之上。不善人以道自保其身者,畏威寡罪,身获全安,是此不善之人,道亦何尝弃之也。拱璧,合拱之璧,驷马,一乘之马,拱璧驷马为至贵,然未足为贵也。不如进此道之为尤贵,拱璧驷马之贵,不如此道也,故万物贵之而以为奥也。○何氏曰:不以宝玉车马为荣,而以坐进此道为贵。 古之所以贵此道者何也,不曰求以得,有罪以免耶,故为天下贵。 林氏曰:且古之以此道为贵者何也,求则得之,道本在我,为仁由己,而由人乎哉。有罪以免者,言一念之善,则可以改过,即恶人斋戒沐浴,则可以祀上帝也。不曰,如谓《诗》不云乎,道无贤愚,悟则得之,此,而由人乎哉。有罪以免者,言一念之善,则可以改过,即恶人斋戒沐浴,则可以祀上帝也。不曰,如谓《诗》不云乎,道无贤愚,悟则得之,此所以为可贵,故曰故为天下贵。○何氏曰:无一夫不获所欲与聚,所求皆得,君子乐得其道,而止於善,小人乐得其欲,而耻为不善,虽有不善者,亦莫不回心向道,迁善远罪,而不自知者。此有道之士获大用於世,而亦以见斯道之功用,贵而益贵也,谓之古之贵此道者,匪今斯今,振古如斯。 第六十三章 为无为,事无事,味无味。 吕氏曰:圣人为无所为,而任物性之自为,则无为而无不为,心曷常动哉,事无所事,而从物务之自事,物自事而无不事,身曷常劳哉。味无所味,则无为而无不为,心曷常动哉,事无所事,而从物务之自事,物自事而无不事,身曷常劳哉。味无所味,而随物气之本味,物本味则无味而无不味,口曷常嗜哉。心不动则众妙可观,身不劳则精神不亏,口不嗜则灵液不竭,至人为於炼养,而不为妄作,事於修真,而不事於尘务,味於道德,而不味於腥膻,故曰为无为,事无事,味无味。○林氏曰:无为而后无不为,故曰为无为。无所事於事,而后能集其事,故曰事无事。无所着於味,而后能知味,故曰味无味。○李氏曰:为无为,发上章万物之奥。为无为,无所不为,事无事,事事有成,味无味,其味幽长,此三者道之奥也。 ,故曰味无味。○李氏曰:为无为,发上章万物之奥。为无为,无所不为,事无事,事事有成,味无味,其味幽长,此三者道之奥也。 大小多少,报怨以德,图难於其易,为大於其细。天下难事,必作於易,天下大事,必作於细。 吕氏曰:涉乎有形,则有小大,系乎有形,则有多少,物量无穷,原其有用,应而不藏,付之素定,可以大则大,可以小则小,可以多则多,可以少则少,万有不同,俱归于一。一皆以道御之,报之以德,人无重恶,何怨之有。至人其道甚大,其朴甚小,其用虽多,其要甚少,大小含太虚於方寸,多少总万有於一真,大同於物而万物与我为一,奚所怨哉。故曰大小多少,报怨以德。夫是非美恶,怨怒恩德,皆生於微渐

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 3