中文 · EN

《道德真经集解(董思靖)》

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 3 volumes 57,146 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真经集解(董思靖)》 (Taixuan 太玄部, 3 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 48 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

Contents (3 volumes)

Vol. 1

道德真经集解(董思靖) > 经名:道德真经集解(董思靖),收录于《中华道藏》道德真经。 经名:道德真经集解。又名:太上老子道德经集解。宋董思靖集解。四卷。底本出处:《正统道藏》洞神部玉诀类。参校本:清光绪三年陆心源刊十万卷楼丛书本(简称十万本)。 道德真经集解序说
Interpretation

Collected Explanations of the True Classic of the Dao and Its Virtue, also known as Collected Explanations of the Supreme Venerable Laozi’s Classic of the Dao and Its Virtue, was compiled and annotated by Dong Sijing during the Song dynasty. It comprises four volumes. The work is included in the Yujue category of the Dongshen Cavern in the Orthodox Daoist Canon. The edition printed by Lu Xinyuan in the third year of the Guangxu reign of the Qing dynasty, as part of the Collected Books from the Ten Thousand Volume Tower, is also used for comparison.

The title of this section is “Prefatory Remarks on the Collected Explanations of the True Classic of the Dao and Its Virtue.”

《史记列传》曰:老子者,楚苦县濑乡曲仁里人也。苦音怙。县本属陈,因楚灭陈,故属楚,即今之亳州真源县也。濑或作厉,杜云:濑水出其西,故以名乡。姓李氏,名耳,字伯阳,谥曰聃。周守藏室之史也,孔子盖尝适周问礼焉。《礼记曾子问》郑氏注曰:老聃古寿考者之号,与孔子同时。疏云:老聪即老子也。《说文》云:鹏,耳曼也。《后汉窦章传》注云:老子为守藏史,复为柱下史。《道藏玄妙玉女内传》其略云:玉女自九天降为天水尹氏女,适李灵飞老君於殷阳甲十七年,史,复为柱下史。《道藏玄妙玉女内传》其略云:玉女自九天降为天水尹氏女,适李灵飞老君於殷阳甲十七年,乘日精化流珠入玉女口中,已而孕,历八十一年,以武丁九年降诞。文王为西伯时,召为守藏史。故《论语》郑玄注云:老彭,商之贤大夫也。疏云:老是老聃也。武王时迁为柱下史,成康之时尚为柱史,昭玉时乃去官。故魏明帝赞云:为周柱史,经九百年。唐博士吴杨昊云:既生商日,复仕周时。计其始终,乃历千载。此皆举其成数也。按《实录》云:自商武丁九年至周赧王九年,升昆仑还紫微上宫之时,计九百九十六年。《史记》曰:或云百六十岁,或云老子在周二百余年,乃入流沙。此以孔子时人斟酌其周赧王九年,升昆仑还紫微上宫之时,计九百九十六年。《史记》曰:或云百六十岁,或云老子在周二百余年,乃入流沙。此以孔子时人斟酌其岁数,不能知其实。所以每事言盖言或,又云莫知所终。故《家语》云:孔子谓南宫敬叔曰:吾闻老聃博古知今,通礼乐之原,明道德之归,则吾师也,今将往矣。有良贾深藏若虚,君子盛德容貌若愚等语,於是孔子发犹龙之叹。按《混元实录》,昭王时出关,穆王元年还中夏,平王东迁,复出关至西海校仙,再还中夏。此问礼及五行等事,乃敬王十七年也。老子居周久之,不实录》,昭王时出关,穆王元年还中夏,平王东迁,复出关至西海校仙,再还中夏。此问礼及五行等事,乃敬王十七年也。老子居周久之,不得以行其道,乃去周。寻欲西化异俗,至函谷关,关令尹喜曰:子将隐矣,强为我着书。於是老子乃着书上下篇,言道德之意五千余言而去,莫知所终。尹喜字公文,盩厔县神龙乡闻仙里人也。少好坟索,善天文秘纬,尝结草为楼,仰观乾象。康王朝,为大夫,后召为东官宾友。昭王时,因瞻紫炁西迈,天文显瑞,知有圣人当度函谷关而西,乃求出为关令,王从之。至关乃曰:夫阳数极九,星宿值金,后召为东官宾友。昭王时,因瞻紫炁西迈,天文显瑞,知有圣人当度函谷关而西,乃求出为关令,王从之。至关乃曰:夫阳数极九,星宿值金,岁月并王,法应九十日外有大圣人经过京邑。先敕关吏孙景曰:若有形客殊俗、车服异常者,勿听过。喜预斋戒,使扫道烧香以俟。是时老君以昭王二十三年五月壬午,驾青牛车,薄版为隆穹,徐甲为御,将往开化西域。至七月十二日甲子,果有老人,皓首聃耳,乘白舆驾青牛至。吏曰:明府有教,愿翁少留。乃入白喜,即具朝服出迎,叩头邀之。老君逊谢至三,尹曰:去冬十月,天理星西行过昴,今月朔,融风三至,东方真炁状如入白喜,即具朝服出迎,叩头邀之。老君逊谢至三,尹曰:去冬十月,天理星西行过昴,今月朔,融风三至,东方真炁状如龙蛇而西度,此大圣人之征。於是为留官舍,设座行弟子礼。喜乃辞疾去官,十二月二十五日,奉邀老君归其家。二十八日授以五千言,至次年四月二十八日,於南山阜辞决升天,戒以千日外寻吾於青羊之肆。至二十七年,会於蜀李太官家。是时诸天众仙浮空而至,老君乃敕五老上帝等授喜玉册金文,赐号文始先生,位为无上真人,赐紫服芙蓉冠等,从游八弦之外也。谓之老子者,盖生而白首,亦以其修道而养寿也。
Interpretation

The Biographies in the Records of the Grand Historian state that Laozi was from Qurenli, Laixiang, in Ku County of the state of Chu. The character Ku is pronounced hu. Ku County originally belonged to Chen; after Chu conquered Chen, it became part of Chu. It was probably located where Zhenyuan County in today’s Bozhou now stands. Laixiang was also written as Lixiang. Du Yu says that the Lai River flowed past the western side of the county seat, and the village took its name from it. Laozi’s surname was Li, his personal name Er, his courtesy name Boyang, and his posthumous title Dan. He once served as an archivist in charge of the Zhou dynasty’s library. Confucius may have visited him to ask about ritual. Zheng Xuan’s commentary on “Zengzi Asks a Question” in the Book of Rites says that “Old Dan” was a form of address for someone advanced in age and long-lived, and that Laozi and Confucius lived at the same time. A later explanation adds that “Old Cong” refers to Laozi. The Shuowen Jiezi says that “Dan” means ears that hang low; a commentary on the Biography of Dou Zhang in the Book of the Later Han says that Laozi first served as keeper of the archives and later became a zhuxia shi, an archivist who managed documents beneath the pillars.

The Inner Biography of the Mysterious and Marvelous Jade Maiden in the Daoist Canon relates, in essence, that the Jade Maiden descended from the Nine Heavens and was born as the daughter of the Yin family of Tianshui. In the seventeenth year of Yin Yangjia’s reign, she married Li Lingfei, the Lord Lao. The Lord transformed himself into the essence of the sun and became a flowing pearl, which entered the Jade Maiden’s mouth. She conceived and, after eighty-one years, gave birth to him in the ninth year of King Wu Ding’s reign. When King Wen of Zhou was still the Earl of the West, he appointed Laozi as keeper of the archives. Zheng Xuan’s commentary on the Analects therefore says that “Lao Peng” was a worthy minister of the Shang dynasty; a later explanation holds that “Lao” refers to Lao Dan. Tradition says that in the time of King Wu, Laozi became an archivist beneath the pillars. He continued in this post during the reigns of Kings Cheng and Kang, and left office only in the time of King Zhao. A eulogy by Emperor Ming of Wei says that he served as a pillar archivist in Zhou for nine hundred years. Wu Yanghao, a Tang dynasty scholar, says that Laozi was born in the Shang dynasty and later served as an official in Zhou, spanning a thousand years altogether. These accounts give only approximate figures. The Veritable Record states that 996 years passed between the ninth year of Wu Ding’s reign and the ninth year of King Nan of Zhou, when Laozi ascended to Kunlun and returned to the Upper Palace of Purple Tenuity.

The Records of the Grand Historian say that some believed Laozi lived to the age of 160, while others said he spent more than two hundred years in the Zhou dynasty before entering the shifting sands of the western desert. These estimates of his age were based on the belief that Confucius and Laozi were contemporaries; the truth is unknown. For this reason, historical accounts often use phrases such as “it is said” and “perhaps,” and also say that “no one knows what became of him.” The Family Sayings of Confucius records Confucius telling Nangong Jingshu: “I have heard that Lao Dan is learned in the ways of past and present, understands the foundations of ritual and music, and knows where virtue finds its ultimate end. He can be my teacher. I intend to go and see him.” Laozi also said that a skilled merchant stores his goods away carefully and appears to have nothing, while a virtuous gentleman is humble in appearance and seems foolish. After hearing Laozi, Confucius exclaimed that he was “like a dragon,” whose depths could not be fathomed and whose transformations were beyond prediction.

The Veritable Record of Primordial Unity says that Laozi passed through the frontier in the time of King Zhao and returned to the Central Plain in the first year of King Mu. When King Ping moved the capital east, Laozi again passed through the frontier, traveling to the Western Sea to seek immortals, and later returned to the Central Plain. Confucius’s questions about ritual and the Five Phases took place in the seventeenth year of King Jing of Zhou. Laozi had lived in Zhou for a long time, but could not put his Dao into practice. He therefore left Zhou, intending to spread his teachings in lands beyond the western frontier. When he reached Hangu Pass, the commandant Yin Xi said, “You are about to withdraw from the world. Please leave me a written work.” Laozi then composed two sections explaining the principles of the Dao and De, totaling more than five thousand characters. He departed, and no one ever learned where he went.

Yin Xi, whose courtesy name was Gongwen, came from Wenxianli in Shenlong Township, Zhuzhi County. As a young man, he delighted in ancient texts and was skilled in astronomy and the secret apocryphal writings. He once built a thatched tower from which to watch the heavens. During the reign of King Kang, he served as a senior official; later, he was summoned to become a companion to the heir apparent. In the time of King Zhao, he saw purple Qi stretching westward. He understood this celestial sign to mean that a sage would pass through Hangu Pass on his way west, and asked to be appointed commandant of the pass. King Zhao agreed.

After Yin Xi arrived at the pass, he said, “Nine is the limit of yang numbers. The constellations correspond to Metal, and the forces of the year and month are strong at the same time. According to the celestial signs, a great sage will pass through the capital in ninety days.” He first instructed the gate officer Sun Jing not to let anyone through if their appearance or clothing seemed unusual. He then undertook purification, ordered people to clear the road and burn incense, and waited.

Tradition says that on the renwu day of the fifth month in the twenty-third year of King Zhao’s reign, the Lord Lao traveled west in a cart drawn by a green ox. The cart had a domed canopy, and Xu Jia drove it as they set out to spread the Dao in the Western Regions. On the jiazi day, the twelfth of the seventh month, an old man with white hair and long ears arrived at the pass in a white cart drawn by a green ox. The gate officer said, “There are orders from above. Please wait here a moment, elder.” He then went in to inform Yin Xi. Yin Xi put on his court robes, came out to greet the old man, and bowed, earnestly asking him to stay. The Lord Lao refused three times. Yin Xi then said, “Last year, in the tenth month, the celestial principle star passed westward through the Pleiades. At the beginning of this month, the Rong wind rose three times, and the true Qi of the east moved west like dragons and snakes. These are all signs that a great sage is arriving.”

Yin Xi arranged for the Lord Lao to stay in the official residence, set out a seat for him, and served him as a disciple. Later, Yin Xi resigned from office on the grounds of illness. On the twenty-fifth day of the twelfth month, he invited the Lord Lao to his home. On the twenty-eighth, the Lord Lao transmitted the Five Thousand Words to him. On the twenty-eighth day of the fourth month of the following year, the Lord Lao took leave on a high place on South Mountain and ascended to heaven, instructing Yin Xi to seek him at the Market of the Green Ram a thousand days later. In the twenty-seventh year of King Zhao’s reign, Yin Xi met the Lord Lao there. The immortals of the heavens descended through the air, and the Lord Lao commanded the Five Elders, the Supreme Emperor, and others to present Yin Xi with jade tablets inscribed in golden script. They bestowed on him the title “Master of the Beginning of Writing,” conferred on him the rank of Supreme Perfected One, and gave him purple robes, a lotus crown, and other gifts. He was thus able to accompany the Lord Lao and travel beyond the eight directions.

Laozi was called “Laozi” either because his hair was already white when he was born, or, some say, because he cultivated the Dao and cared for his life, attaining great longevity.

《道德经》者,其文载道德之旨,而可以常由也。唐《艺文志》曰:天宝中加号《老子玄通道德经》云。葛玄序曰:夫五千文,宣道德之源,大无不包,细无道德经》者,其文载道德之旨,而可以常由也。唐《艺文志》曰:天宝中加号《老子玄通道德经》云。葛玄序曰:夫五千文,宣道德之源,大无不包,细无不入,天人之自然经也。斑固载老子传说,傅氏三十七篇,邻氏四篇,徐氏六篇,刘向四篇。杜光庭云:注者有尹喜内解,汉张道陵想尔、河上公章句、严遵指归,魏王弼、何晏、郭象、锺会、孙登,晋羊祜、裴处思、苻坚时沙门罗什,后赵佛图澄,晋僧肇,梁陶弘景,后魏卢景裕、刘仁会,南齐顾欢、松灵仙人,齐杜弼,宋张凭、梁武帝、梁简文帝、张嗣,梁道士赃玄静、孟安排,孟智周、窦略,陈道士褚柔,隋道士李播、刘进喜,唐魏征、傅奕、杨上善、贾至、王光庭、王真、仙人胡超、道士宋文明、尹文操、韦录、王玄辨、尹愔、徐邈、何思远、薛季昌、王鞮、赵志坚、车惠弼、李荣、黎元兴、张人胡超、道士宋文明、尹文操、韦录、王玄辨、尹愔、徐邈、何思远、薛季昌、王鞮、赵志坚、车惠弼、李荣、黎元兴、张慧超、龚法师、任太玄、申甫、张道相、成玄英、符少明。唐《艺文志》又有安丘望之、湘逸其姓、程韶、王尚、蜀才、袁真、释惠严、惠琳、义盈、梁旷树、李允愿、陈嗣古、冯廓、玄景先生、杨上器、韩杜、贾大隐、辟闾仁谞、刘仲融、王肃、戴诜、元宗、卢藏用、邢南和、冯朝隐、白覆忠、尹知章、陆德明、陈庭玉、陆希声、吴善经、孙思邈、李含光,凡四十家。而《藏》中所存,李约、贾清夷、王顾、杜光庭等皆唐人,且不着於《志》,始知所录犹有未尽。惜名存书亡者,十盖八九。河上公分八十一章,以应太阳之极、王顾、杜光庭等皆唐人,且不着於《志》,始知所录犹有未尽。惜名存书亡者,十盖八九。河上公分八十一章,以应太阳之极数。上经三十七章,法天数奇;下经四十四章,法地数耦。刘饮《七略》云:刘向定着二篇八十一章,上经三十四章,下经四十七章。而葛洪等又加损益,乃云天以四时成,故上经四九三十六章,地以五行成,故下经五九四十五章,通应九九之数。清源子刘骥曰:矢口而言,未尝分为九九章也。严遵以阳九阴八相乘为七十二,上四十章,下三十二章。王五九四十五章,通应九九之数。清源子刘骥曰:矢口而言,未尝分为九九章也。严遵以阳九阴八相乘为七十二,上四十章,下三十二章。王弼合上下为一篇,亦不分章。今世本多依河上章句,或总为上下篇。广川董逌云:唐元宗既注《老子》,始改定章句。言道者类之上卷,言德者类之下卷,刻石涡口庙中。元宗释题云:道者,德之体。德者,道之用。经分上下者,先明道而德次之。然其末又云:是知体用互陈,递明精要,不必定名於上下也。江袤云:余昔於藏书家见,道之用。经分上下者,先明道而德次之。然其末又云:是知体用互陈,递明精要,不必定名於上下也。江袤云:余昔於藏书家见古文,《老子》次序先后与今篇章不伦,亦颇疑后人析之也。元宗命司马子微三体写本,有五千三百八十.字。傅奕考窍众本,勘数其字云:项羽妾本,齐武平五年彭城人开妾冢得之。安丘望之本,魏太和中道士寇谦之得之。河上丈人本,齐处士仇岳传之。三本有五千七百二十二字,与韩非《喻老》相参。又洛阳官本五千六百三十五字,王弼本五千六百八十三字,或零六百一十或三百五十五或五百九十,多少不一。《史记》云五千余言,但不满六千,则是矣。今云五千文者,举全数也。彭耜五或五百九十,多少不一。《史记》云五千余言,但不满六千,则是矣。今云五千文者,举全数也。彭耜皇宋集注有政和御注、道士陈景元、司马温公光、苏文定公辙、王荆公安石、王雱、陆佃、刘概、刘泾、仙姑曹道冲、马蹄山、达真子、了一子、李文愁、陈象古、叶梦得、清源子刘骥、朱文公熹、黄茂材、程文简公大昌、林东、邵若愚,而倪文节公思、高士徐知常等注,亦未尽录。
Interpretation

The Dao De Jing records the central teachings of the Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue/Power). It is a classic that people can follow throughout their lives. The Bibliographical Treatise of the Tang dynasty records that during the Tianbao era, the text was given the title Laozi’s Mysterious Communication with the Dao and De. In his preface, Ge Xuan says that the Five Thousand Characters explains the roots of Dao and De. It is vast enough to encompass everything and subtle enough to penetrate everywhere, and is a classic that expounds the natural principles of Heaven, Earth, and humanity.

The Biography of Laozi recorded by Ban Gu mentions that the Fu recension had thirty-seven sections, the Lin recension four, the Xu recension six, and the Liu recension four. Du Guangting also lists commentators on the Laozi from successive generations, including Yin Xi, Zhang Daoling, Heshang Gong, Yan Zun, Wang Bi, He Yan, Guo Xiang, Tao Hongjing, Emperor Wu of Liang, and Cheng Xuanying. Tang commentators included Wei Zheng, Fu Yi, Yang Shangshan, and Du Guangting. The Tang Bibliographical Treatise records many other commentators, forty in all. Yet the Daoist Canon preserves commentaries by Li Yue, Jia Qingyi, Wang Gu, Du Guangting, and others that are Tang works but were not included in the Bibliographical Treatise. This shows that its records are still incomplete. It is regrettable that although the names of many commentators have survived, their works have been lost—perhaps eight or nine out of every ten.

Different schools offer different accounts of how the Dao De Jing is divided into chapters. Heshang Gong divided the text into eighty-one chapters, believing this corresponded to the sun’s ultimate number. The Upper Classic has thirty-seven chapters, taking the odd number as the number of Heaven; the Lower Classic has forty-four, taking the even number as the number of Earth. The recension collated by Liu Xiang, by contrast, is divided into two parts and eighty-one chapters: thirty-four in the Upper Classic and forty-seven in the Lower. Ge Hong and others altered the chapter count, explaining that Heaven is formed by the four seasons, so the Upper Classic has thirty-six chapters, while Earth is formed by the Five Phases (Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, and Water), so the Lower Classic has forty-five. Together, these correspond to the number ninety-nine. Qingyuanzi Liu Ji considered such explanations mere offhand speculation, since the text was not originally divided into chapters by nines. Yan Zun multiplied Yang Nine by Yin Eight to arrive at seventy-two chapters, with forty in the first part and thirty-two in the second. Wang Bi combined the two parts into one and did not divide the text into chapters.

Most editions in circulation today follow Heshang Gong’s chapter divisions, though some are divided only into upper and lower parts. Dong You of Guangchuan says that it was only after Emperor Xuanzong of Tang wrote a commentary on the Laozi that the chapters and sentences were reorganized: passages discussing the Dao were placed in the upper volume, and those discussing De in the lower volume, and the text was carved at the temple at Wokou. In explaining the title, Emperor Xuanzong said that the Dao is the substance of De, and De is the function of the Dao; the text is divided into upper and lower volumes because it discusses the Dao first and De afterward. He also observed, however, that the substance and function of Dao and De illuminate one another’s essentials, so there is no need to be bound by the labels “upper” and “lower.” Jiang Mao says that he once saw an ancient copy of the Laozi in a collector’s library whose order of sections differed greatly from that of the current text. He therefore suspected that later readers had divided it into upper and lower parts.

The copy that Emperor Xuanzong ordered Sima Ziquan to transcribe in three scripts contained 5,380 characters. After collating various copies, Fu Yi recorded that the text unearthed from the tomb of Xiang Yu’s concubine, the Anqiu Wangzhi copy, and the Heshang Zhangren copy each contained 5,722 characters. The official Luoyang edition had 5,635; the Wang Bi edition had 5,683; and other editions also differed in character count. The Records of the Grand Historian says that the Laozi contains more than five thousand words but fewer than six thousand characters, which roughly accords with the evidence. The phrase “Five Thousand Characters” is simply a rounded name.

The Collected Commentaries of the Great Song, compiled by Peng Si, includes the imperial commentary from the Zhenghe era, as well as commentaries by Chen Jingyuan, Sima Guang, Su Zhe, Wang Anshi, Wang Pang, Lu Dian, Liu Gai, Liu Jing, Cao Daochong, and others. It also includes commentaries by Ye Mengde, Liu Ji, Zhu Xi, Huang Maocai, Cheng Dachang, and Shao Ruoyu. Commentaries by Ni Si, Xu Zhichang, and others are included too, though they are not all listed here.

大抵老子之道,以清诤无为自然为宗,以虚明应物不滞为用,以慈俭谦下不争为行,以无欲无事不先天以开人为治。其於治身治人者,至矣。如用之,则太古之治可复也。《前汉艺文志》云:道家者流,秉要执本,清虚以自守,卑弱以自持,此君人南面之术也。欧阳汉艺文志》云:道家者流,秉要执本,清虚以自守,卑弱以自持,此君人南面之术也。欧阳修《崇文总叔》云:本清虚,去健羡,泊然自守,故日我无为而民自化,我好静而民自正。虽圣人南面之治,不可易也。以其所值之时,俗尚文胜,淳朴之风无复存者,而老子抱纯素之道,与时偕极,必待感而后应,故不得位以推是道於天下。盖知夫时数之有所作也,然终不能忽然於其道之无传,是以有教无类,而且睠睠於西方之异俗,则其悯当时虑后世之心何如哉。犹幸斯。盖知夫时数之有所作也,然终不能忽然於其道之无传,是以有教无类,而且睠睠於西方之异俗,则其悯当时虑后世之心何如哉。犹幸斯文不坠,故西关伺驾,东鲁见龙,而书与言之尚存也。河上丈人、黄石公、乐臣公、盖公之徒,盖能究其旨而体之,敛厥用於一身,则在我之天下已羲皇矣。及其道之有所授,则孝文以之为君,子房以之佐汉,曹参以之相齐,果能通一脉於苛秦之后。吁,亦验也。然使又有进於是,如其人羲皇之则羲皇矣。或者见是书词意含洪宽大,而不知致察於虚极静笃之时,存乎体之至严至密者,以为庶政庶事之本,乃徒务为闷闷若昏之量,而习弊反堕於优游姑息,遂有清虚不及用之讥,故不经而子视之。呜呼,惜哉。文中子曰:清虚长而晋室乱,非老子之罪也。朱文公曰:晋时诸公,只是借他言语,来盖覆那灭弃礼法之行耳,据其心下污浊纷扰,如何理文公曰:晋时诸公,只是借他言语,来盖覆那灭弃礼法之行耳,据其心下污浊纷扰,如何理会得老子底意思。《旧唐书.宪宗纪》李藩对曰:《老子指归》与六经无异。唐兵部郎李约云:世传此书为神仙虚无言,不知六经乃黄老之枝叶尔。故太史公论大道,则先黄老而后六经,不为无见也。
Interpretation

In general, Laozi’s Dao rests on stillness, non-contention, and following nature. Its function lies in a mind that is empty, still, and clear, able to respond to the myriad things without becoming constrained by them. Its guiding principles for conduct are compassion, frugality, humility, and non-contention. In governing the state, it advocates few desires and few affairs, and warns against imposing actions on the people by rushing ahead of them. In this way, the people are guided to develop of their own accord. These principles are highly effective both for self-cultivation and for governing the state. If put into practice, they could restore the simple style of governance of ancient times.

The “Treatise on Arts and Letters” in the Former Han History (Book of Han) says that the Daoist school grasps the root, preserves itself through stillness and emptiness, and maintains itself through humility and gentleness; these are methods by which a ruler may govern the world. Ouyang Xiu’s General Catalogue of the Chongwen Library likewise says that Daoism takes stillness and emptiness as its foundation, discards forcefulness and greed, and remains detached and self-contained. Thus Laozi says, “When I practice Wuwei, the people transform themselves; when I love stillness, the people set themselves right.” The principles by which sages govern the world cannot easily be changed.

In Laozi’s time, worldly customs favored artifice, and simplicity had already disappeared. Laozi held fast to the Dao of unadorned authenticity, acted in accordance with the times, and responded only when circumstances called forth a response. As a result, he did not attain the throne and could not put his principles into practice throughout the world. He knew that circumstances change of their own accord, yet could never bear to let his Dao lose its transmission. So he taught widely, without distinction, and took special concern for people in the west whose customs differed from those around him. His compassion for his own age and concern for later generations were truly profound. Fortunately, his teachings were not lost: when he traveled west through the Hangu Pass, the pass official Yin Xi welcomed him; and in eastern Lu, Confucius compared Laozi to a “dragon.” These records and sayings have therefore been preserved.

The elders of the Yellow River, the Yellow Stone Elder, Le Chenggong, Gai Gong, and others probably understood and practiced Laozi’s central teaching, drawing its effects inward into their own cultivation. In this way, one’s personal circumstances could become like those of the time of Fuxi, a legendary age of ancient simplicity and good governance. Later, these teachings were passed on to different people: Emperor Wen of Han used them to govern the state, Zhang Liang, courtesy name Zifang, used them to support the Han dynasty, and Cao Can used them to govern Qi. They truly helped Laozi’s school of thought endure after the harsh rule of the Qin. This shows that Laozi’s Dao was effective.

Yet if someone could go further and put these principles fully into practice, their own age, too, could attain the condition of the time of Fuxi. Some see only the expansive depth of the wording in the Laozi, without recognizing the profound concentration and rigorous self-discipline required by “reaching the utmost in emptiness and holding firmly to stillness.” Such cultivation should be the foundation for handling all kinds of government affairs. If one merely imitates the outward appearance of leniency and inaction, one can easily lapse into permissiveness and indulgence. Then people mock the Way of stillness as unfit for governing the world, and some cease to regard it as serious learning, even treating it as worthless. This is truly regrettable.

Wenzi, the Sui dynasty thinker Wang Tong, said, “The ethos of stillness and emptiness flourished, yet the Jin dynasty fell into chaos. This was not Laozi’s fault.” Zhu Xi also said that the celebrated men of the Jin dynasty merely used Laozi’s words to disguise their abandonment of ritual and law. Their minds were corrupt and chaotic; how could they truly have understood Laozi’s meaning?

The Records of Emperor Xianzong in the Old Book of Tang recounts that Li Fan replied, “The Meaning of the Laozi is no different from the Six Classics.” Li Yue, a Tang dynasty official in the Ministry of War, also said that people portray the Laozi as a teaching about immortals and the Way of emptiness, without realizing that the Six Classics are, in fact, branches of the learning of Huang-Lao, the teachings of the Yellow Emperor and Laozi. Thus, when Sima Qian discussed the Great Way, he spoke first of Huang-Lao and then of the Six Classics; there was good reason for this.

是经大义固已见於诸家,然或病其无所折衷。仆昏蒙晚学,过不自量,辄采摭诸说,亦问出己见,以补一二。或诠其文,或逗其意,附以音释,订以异同,图便观览,庶日益日损,而契言外之旨於绝学无忧之地也。或谓微言隐诀,多寓其间,故以首章有无,为在二丹,则神炁水火也。虚心实腹则炼铅之旨,用兵善战则采铅之方。冲字从水从中,乃喻气中真一之水。三十辐共一毂,为取五藏各有六气之象,及准一月火符之数。如斯腹则炼铅之旨,用兵善战则采铅之方。冲字从水从中,乃喻气中真一之水。三十辐共一毂,为取五藏各有六气之象,及准一月火符之数。如斯等义,今皆略之。
Interpretation

Earlier scholars have offered many interpretations of this scripture’s central ideas, though some believe their views lack a balanced judgment. My abilities are limited, and I came to the subject late, yet I have presumptuously gathered these different opinions and occasionally added my own, hoping to contribute something further. At times I explain the wording; at others, I clarify its meaning. I have also included notes on pronunciation and corrections of variant editions to help readers consult the text. I hope that, through steady study over time, readers may gain something, gradually loosen their attachments, and eventually grasp the intent beyond words, reaching a state beyond ordinary learning, free from inner worry.

Some believe that subtle, hidden formulas for cultivation lie within the scripture. They therefore interpret “being” and “nonbeing” in the opening chapter as two methods of alchemy—that is, different levels of Neidan cultivation—and identify them with such elements of practice as Shen, Qi, water, and fire. They take “empty the heart and fill the belly” to express the essential principle of refining lead, and “use troops and fight well” to describe the method of gathering lead. Some also believe that the character “chong” is formed from the elements for water and center, and thus alludes to the truly real, unified water within Qi. They read “thirty spokes converge on one hub” as symbolizing the six Qi within each of the five viscera, and as corresponding to the month-long schedule of firing times—the method of adjusting the alchemical fire according to the seasons. For now, I will set these interpretations aside.

或者盖谓无者地二之火,有者天一之水,故举《港通诀》云:两无宗一有,灵化妙难窥。及以知白守黑为金水之说,然此乃大丹之法,准易象,法天地,以日魂月魄为药物,则神农古文《龙虎上经》三十六字、西汉淮阳王演《金碧要旨经》、东汉魏伯阳《参同契》、唐元阳子《金碧潜通诀》等,是其法也。如《混元实录》云:老君先授》三十六字、西汉淮阳王演《金碧要旨经》、东汉魏伯阳《参同契》、唐元阳子《金碧潜通诀》等,是其法也。如《混元实录》云:老君先授尹真内外二丹之卫,然后告以道德之旨,则是不以丹术杂於本经,明矣。又月:三一九思,内修之要也。九丹金液,外炼之极也。故所授太清诸经,则专言金液外炼之事,然与前所举大丹之法亦少异。后辈见其有坛炉鼎灶之设,乃以灵砂金石等为外丹,殊不知后天有质阴杂非类之顽物,服之令人多躁失明,而且不悟其非也。或者又曰:无者,神也。有者,炁也。乃以有无交入为丹本,隐显相符是水金。及黑中有白为丹母,虚心实腹义俱深,三十辐兮同一毂等诗为证。此虽乃以有无交入为丹本,隐显相符是水金。及黑中有白为丹母,虚心实腹义俱深,三十辐兮同一毂等诗为证。此虽皆用经中之语以为诀,然其说自成一宗,盖内丹之法也。若尹真所受三一九思等法,虽曰内修之事,然与内丹源流亦自不同,大抵道法经术各有指归,不可以一书而兼尽诸家之义,苟强引而合,皆傅会也。何则?性由自悟,术假师传。使其果寓微旨,亦必已成之士口授纤悉,然后无惑。区区纸上,乌足明哉。况是经标道德之宗,畅无为之旨,高超象外,妙入环中,遽容以他说小传。使其果寓微旨,亦必已成之士口授纤悉,然后无惑。区区纸上,乌足明哉。况是经标道德之宗,畅无为之旨,高超象外,妙入环中,遽容以他说小数杂之乎?白乐天云:元元皇帝五千言,不言药,不言仙、不言白日升青天。亦确论也。苏文忠公轼奉诏撰储祥宫碑,其大略云:道家者流,本出於黄帝老子,其道以清静无为为宗,以虚明应物为用,以俭慈不争为行,合於《易》何思何虑、《论语》仁者静寿之说。自奏汉以来,始用方士言,乃有飞仙变化之术,黄庭大洞之法,木公金母之号,太乙紫微之祀。下至於丹药奇技,符箓小数,皆归於道家。尝窃论之,黄帝老子之道,本也。方士之言,末也。得其本而末自至。噫,修之身,其德真,以至於道家。尝窃论之,黄帝老子之道,本也。方士之言,末也。得其本而末自至。噫,修之身,其德真,以至天下,其德乃普,非二本也。学者果能得一而有以贯通,则所谓杳冥之精,恍惚之妙,实昭然於守中抱一之中,而玄牝之机,橐钥之用,莫非道之所为也。惟深造自得者知之。
Interpretation

Some people hold that “Nonbeing” is the fire of Earth Two, while “Being” is the water of Heaven One. They therefore cite the Gangtong Jue (a text on alchemical cultivation): “Two ‘Nonbeings’ take one ‘Being’ as their root; its wondrous transformations are difficult to fathom.” They also interpret “Know the white, preserve the black” in terms of Metal and Water.

But this account concerns the Great Elixir, an alchemical method centered on internal refinement and modeled on the transformations of Yin-Yang in Heaven and Earth. It does not express the original meaning of the Dao De Jing. Based on the images and numbers of the Yi, it models itself on Heaven and Earth and takes the sun’s hun-soul and the moon’s po-soul as its ingredients. The thirty-six characters of the ancient Longhu Shang Jing attributed to Shennong, the Jinbi Yaozhi Jing composed by the Prince of Huaiyang in the Western Han, Wei Boyang’s Cantong Qi of the Eastern Han, and Yuan Yangzi’s Tang-era Jinbi Qiantong Jue all belong to this kind of alchemical practice. The Hunyuan Shilu says that Lord Lao first taught Yin Zhen methods of cultivating both Neidan (internal alchemy) and Waidan (external alchemy), and only afterward explained the meaning of the Dao De Jing. This shows that alchemical arts were not mixed into the scripture itself.

Another view holds that the Nine Reflections on the Three Ones are an important method of internal cultivation, while the Nine Elixirs and Golden Liquid are the highest methods of external refinement. The scriptures of the Great Purity therefore deal specifically with refining Golden Liquid externally, though this differs somewhat from the Great Elixir practice described above. Later readers saw that these texts set out an altar, furnace, cauldron, and stove, and understood them as instructions for refining external elixirs from cinnabar and minerals. They did not realize that such acquired, tangible, and impure substances would make people agitated and blind if ingested. They still failed to recognize the error in this practice.

Some also say that “Nonbeing” is Shen (spirit), while “Being” is Qi (vital energy); the union of Being and Nonbeing is the foundation of alchemical refinement, and the joining of the hidden and the manifest is Metal and Water. White contained within black is the mother of the Elixir. They also use phrases from the Dao De Jing, such as “Empty the heart and fill the belly” and “Thirty spokes converge at one hub,” as evidence. Although these interpretations quote the scripture as formulas, they form a school of their own and in fact describe Neidan practice.

As for the methods such as the Nine Reflections on the Three Ones that Yin Zhen received, although they too belong to internal cultivation, their line of transmission is different from that of Neidan. Daoist methods and scriptural teachings each have their own purpose; one cannot expect a single book to encompass every teaching of every school. To force different views together is to make unwarranted connections. Why? One must realize one’s nature for oneself, while methods of cultivation must be received from a teacher. If they truly contain subtle and hidden teachings, a practitioner who has attained mastery must explain them fully in person to prevent misunderstanding. How could the words on a page alone make them clear? Moreover, the Dao De Jing expounds the foundations of Dao and De and sets forth the principle of Wuwei (non-action). Its vision is exalted and profound. How could other teachings be casually mixed into it?

Bai Juyi said: “The five thousand words of the Primordial Emperor do not speak of medicines, becoming an immortal, or ascending bodily in daylight.” This is precisely right. Su Shi, commissioned by imperial order to write the Stele of the Palace of Auspicious Preservation, wrote in substance that the Daoist lineage originates with the Yellow Emperor and Laozi. Its guiding principle is clarity and stillness with Wuwei; its function is emptiness and lucidity in responding to things; and its conduct is governed by frugality, compassion, and non-contention. This accords with the Book of Changes on having neither thought nor worry, and with the Analects on the benevolent being still and long-lived. Only from the Han dynasty onward did people begin to adopt the claims of the practitioners of esoteric arts. Thus arose techniques of flying immortals and transformation, the methods of the Huangting and Dadong, the titles Duke of Wood and Queen Mother of Metal, and rites to the Great One and the Purple Tenuity. Later came elixirs, extraordinary techniques, Fulu (talismans and registers), and other practices, all of which were subsumed under Daoism.

Su Shi considered the Dao of the Yellow Emperor and Laozi fundamental, and the claims of esoteric practitioners secondary. Once one grasps the root, the branches can follow of their own accord. Cultivate oneself so that one’s De (Virtue/Power) becomes genuine and pure, then extend it throughout the world, and De will become widespread; these are not two different foundations. If students of the Dao can grasp the One and understand its principle throughout, then the subtle depths that are hard to fathom, and the elusive, mysterious realm, will become clear through holding to the center and embracing the One. The workings of the Mysterious Female—the subtle gateway through which all things come into being—and the function of the bellows, a metaphor for the Dao’s operation, are also expressions of the Dao. Only those who practice deeply and attain understanding for themselves can know this.

淳佑丙午腊月望清源天庆观后学圭山董思靖书。 2-道德真经集解卷之一 道德真经集解卷之一 后学董思靖集解 道可道,非常道;名可名,非常名。此先标以为立言之始也。 道者,万理之总名。名者,万物之所指。然道不可名,非言能喻,将托於言,强名曰道,故道而可道,名而可名,则非常道常名矣。常道常名者,即经所谓道常无者,万物之所指。然道不可名,非言能喻,将托於言,强名曰道,故道而可道,名而可名,则非常道常名矣。常道常名者,即经所谓道常无名,而自古及今,其名不去者是也。常之为言,自然长存,无时不然,无处不有。 无名,天地之始; 此言道者天地万物之原也。以其绝无朕兆,故莫得而名,此即常道常名,形而上者是也。 有名,万物之母。 此即两仪既立,已有可名,而万有皆从此生,乃形而下者是也。 常无欲,以观其妙;
Interpretation

Written by the later student Guishan Dong Sijing at Qingyuan Tianqing Abbey on the fifteenth day of the twelfth month of the Bingwu year of the Chunyou era.

Collected Explanations of the True Scripture of the Dao and Its Virtue, Volume One

Compiled and explained by the later student Dong Sijing

“If the Dao (the Way) can be put clearly into words, it is not the constant Dao; if a name can be fixed and defined, it is not a constant name.” These are the opening words of the entire text, setting out the purpose of its argument.

“Dao” is the general name for the principle that encompasses all principles; “name” is what we use to refer to the myriad things. But the Dao cannot be confined by a name, nor can words explain it completely. We can only make use of words and provisionally call it “Dao.” Thus, once the Dao can be fully expressed or a name fixed, they are no longer the constant Dao and the constant name. The constant Dao and name are what the scripture calls “the Dao that is constantly nameless”: from ancient times to the present, its true existence has never vanished. “Constant” means that it endures naturally, existing at all times and in all places.

The nameless is the beginning of Heaven and Earth.

This means that the Dao is the source of Heaven, Earth, and the myriad things. Because the Dao has no trace or sign, it cannot be named. This is the constant Dao, belonging to the metaphysical realm: existence beyond concrete forms.

The named is the mother of the myriad things.

Once Heaven and Earth and Yin-Yang (the Two Modes) have taken shape, things can be referred to by names, and the myriad things come into being. This belongs to the physical realm, the realm of concrete forms and things.

By constantly remaining free of desire, one can observe the Dao’s subtlety.

此言圣人体道在己,乃寂然不动,所存者神之时,即此可见道体之至微至妙者也。常者,真常妙本也。盖无欲为静,体之常也。有欲为动,用之行也。虽动静不同时,体用必有分。然妙本湛然,寂而常感,感而常寂,未始有间体之常也。有欲为动,用之行也。虽动静不同时,体用必有分。然妙本湛然,寂而常感,感而常寂,未始有间,常自若也。故皆曰常观者,廓然大公,寂无不照之义。 常有欲,以观其徼。 徼,古吊切,边际也。此感而应之时也,於此可观妙道之用矣。是盖指其动而可见处言之,周子所谓静无而动有是也。陈景元云:大道边有小路曰徼。 此两者,同出而异名,同谓之玄。玄之又玄,众妙之门。
Interpretation

This passage says that when sages embody the Dao, they can remain utterly still while preserving an inner spiritual awareness. From this, we can see that the substance of the Dao is subtle and mysterious.

“Constant” refers to the wondrous source that is truly constant and unchanging. Without desire, one returns to stillness—this is the enduring aspect of the Dao’s substance. When desire arises, the Dao is set in motion—this is the operation of the Dao. Movement and stillness differ, as do substance and function, yet the wondrous source remains clear and luminous throughout. It is always responsive in stillness, and remains still even as it responds; it never ceases, and so remains constant as before. “Constantly observe” means to view all things with an open, impartial, and tranquil mind, leaving nothing unseen.

In “constant desire, to observe its limits,” “limits” is pronounced jiào and means boundaries. This refers to the moment when the Dao responds to things and acts upon them. Through this visible activity, one can observe the Dao’s function. Chen Jingyuan says that a small path beside the Great Dao is called a “limit.”

These two ways of observing, “without desire” and “with desire,” both arise from the Dao; they differ only in name. Both point toward the Dao’s profound mystery. Within mystery lies a deeper mystery: the gateway through which all wonders come into being.

此总结上意。两者,谓无名有名,妙与徼也。体用一源,故曰同也。出,即动静之义。谓或动或静,而体用分焉,故曰异名。然称名虽殊,即本则一,故又曰同也。惟同则性情冥而不可致诘,是谓之玄。凡远而无所至极,则其色必玄,其在人心,乃渊默无象之义。夫玄虽变通无极,深不可测,然犹有玄之心在焉。又玄,则遣其滞玄之累也,湛然无迹而能开阖阴阳,化生不匮,在於事义。夫玄虽变通无极,深不可测,然犹有玄之心在焉。又玄,则遣其滞玄之累也,湛然无迹而能开阖阴阳,化生不匮,在於事物最为微妙,而理事皆由此出,故云众妙之门。
Interpretation

This summarizes the meaning of the preceding passage. “The two” refers to the nameless and the named—that is, the “subtle” and the “manifest” (the hidden, subtle aspect of things and their visible boundaries and signs). Substance and function arise from the same source, so they are called “the same.” “Emerging” implies movement and stillness: sometimes in motion, sometimes at rest, substance and function appear distinct, so they are said to have “different names.” Though their names differ, their root is one; thus they are also called “the same.”

Because they arise from one source, human nature and principle accord with the Dao in a profound way that cannot be traced to its end. This is called “the mysterious.” “Mysterious” originally means far-reaching and without end; applied to the human mind, it describes a still, deep state without any concrete form. Though the mysterious changes without limit and cannot be fathomed, clinging to the idea of “the mysterious” remains a kind of constraint. To speak further of “the mysterious within the mysterious” is to let go even of attachment to the mysterious, leaving the mind clear and without trace. In this way, one can set Yin-Yang transformations in motion and bring forth the myriad things without end.

The subtlest principles in all things arise from this, which is why it is called “the gateway to all mysteries.”

右一章河上公名体道章,诸家多以章首数字为名。此章包罗揆序一经之旨也。或问有名无名,前辈多就无字有字为句,今独不然,何耶?曰:所谓无名即道也,有名即炁也。惟道无形而炁有兆,故以无名有名为之别。今云无名天地之始者,盖谓道在天地之先而初无定名之可指,故经云道常无名,又云道隐无名是也。惟道无所不在,虽超乎无物之先,然亦未尝不在乎有物之后,故在无为无而未尝滞於无,在有为有而未尝局於有。惟不可定名,而其名自古以固存,此其所以为常道常名也欤。若直以无而名之,则是以道为专属於无,及其无化而为有,又不可名为无矣。有无相因,变化不已,名亦随之,则岂所谓常道常名也欤。若直以无而名之,则是以道为专属於无,及其无化而为有,又不可名为无矣。有无相因,变化不已,名亦随之,则岂所谓常名哉。瓦有无固不足以论道,苟欲必谓之无,未免沦於空寂之一偏,则天地万化,果何自而有耶?今云无名者,特以其寂兮寥兮,无形可状,无名可指。然於无形无名之中,天地万物之理莫不毕具,此其所以不可直谓之无也。夫道不可得而名也,惟圣人无思於言则已,苟欲立言,非名之则无以显其道,然又恐学者寻言滞句而名道以方,故先标於篇首曰:道可道,非常道;名可名,非常名。其旨深矣。或问常无欲常有欲者,前辈多以常无常有为绝句,今亦不然,则所谓无欲故可,而谓之有欲可故先标於篇首曰:道可道,非常道;名可名,非常名。其旨深矣。或问常无欲常有欲者,前辈多以常无常有为绝句,今亦不然,则所谓无欲故可,而谓之有欲可乎?曰:圣人之心何尝有欲,今所谓有欲,乃即其起处而言耳。当其静而无为之时,乃无欲也。及其应物而动,虽未尝离
Interpretation

The first chapter is titled “Understanding the Dao” in the Heshanggong Commentary; most other commentators name chapters after their opening words. Dong Sijing considers this chapter a summary and explanation of the central principles of the entire text.

Someone asked: How should “nameless” and “named” be punctuated and understood? Earlier commentators usually read each together with the following word, “nameless” with “beginning” and “named” with “mother.” Why is the reading different here? Dong Sijing explained: “Nameless” refers to the Dao, while “named” refers to Qi—the primordial energy that constitutes all things. The Dao has no form, whereas Qi has already shown signs of manifestation; hence the distinction between “nameless” and “named.” To say “the nameless is the beginning of Heaven and Earth” means that the Dao precedes Heaven and Earth, yet has no fixed name by which it can be identified. The Dao De Jing says, “The Dao is constantly nameless” and “The Dao is hidden and nameless”; these express the same idea.

The Dao is everywhere: it exists beyond all things and also runs through them. The Dao abides in non-action and formlessness, yet is not confined to “nonbeing.” It manifests as being, yet is not confined by “being.” The Dao cannot be given a fixed name, but its name has endured unchanged since ancient times; hence it is called the “constant Dao” and the “constant name.”

If the Dao is simply called “nonbeing,” one might suppose that it belongs only to nonbeing. But once nonbeing transforms into being, it can no longer be called nonbeing. Being and nonbeing depend on each other and continually change, and their names change along with them. How, then, could they be called the constant Dao and the constant name? Neither being nor nonbeing, in itself, is enough to explain the Dao. Insisting that the Dao is nonbeing risks leaning toward emptiness and stillness. Where, then, would Heaven, Earth, and all things come from? To call it “nameless” here means only that the Dao is still and profound, with no form that can be depicted and no name that can identify it. Yet the principles of Heaven, Earth, and all things are contained within it, so the Dao cannot simply be called “nonbeing.”

The Dao cannot be fully expressed in words. If a sage remained silent, there would naturally be no need to give it a name. But once the sage uses words to make the Dao clear, it becomes necessary to name it. The sage also fears that those who study the Dao may cling to words and mistake the name for the Dao itself. Thus the text begins: “The Dao that can be spoken is not the constant Dao; the name that can be named is not the constant name.” Dong Sijing considers the meaning of this statement profound.

Someone else asked how to punctuate “always without desire” and “always with desire.” Earlier commentators usually read “always without” and “always with” as separate phrases. Why not read them that way here? If the text means “without desire, one can therefore…,” how should “with desire, one can therefore…” be understood? Dong Sijing replied: The sage’s heart has no selfish desires. “With desire” here refers only to the point at which the Dao begins to function. When still and inactive, it is called “without desire”; when it responds to things and acts, its function becomes visible, yet it has not departed from the Dao…

乎静,然在於事事物物,则已有边徼涯涘之可见,见,故对无欲而言有欲也。欲犹从心所欲踰矩之欲耳。朱文公答沈庄仲之问,亦云。徼是边徼,如边界相似,是说那应接处。向来人皆作常无常有点,不若只作常无欲常有欲看。今若必欲以常无常有为绝句,则是常无未免沦於断灭之顽空,而常有乃堕於执滞之常情,岂足以观妙道之体用哉。况以常无为句,而下文云欲以观其妙,则於常无之时而亦谓之欲,可乎?或问此两者同出而异常有乃堕於执滞之常情,岂足以观妙道之体用哉。况以常无为句,而下文云欲以观其妙,则於常无之时而亦谓之欲,可乎?或问此两者同出而异名,固多就者字为句,或有以同字属上句,何耶?曰章首既以无名有名别道与炁,次又以无欲有欲分体与用,则章末固当合而结之也。夫道炁体用固不可无别,然初非相离而各为一物,惟徼无是道则炁无以立,无是炁则道无以寓,非是体则用无以行,非是用则体无以显。道宰乎炁而不囿乎炁,用着乎体而实源乎体,道即体也,炁即用也,体用一源,理物无问,故曰此两者云云。盖虽即冲漠无眹之体,而昭然事物之用已具。即事事物物之用,而漠然无朕之体不违。然动静不同名,物理必有分,是以静而无名无欲则体也昭然事物之用已具。即事事物物之用,而漠然无朕之体不违。然动静不同名,物理必有分,是以静而无名无欲则体也,及至於动而有名-有欲则用也,故继之曰异名矣。则是即静之体而为动之用,初非指动静为二本,及置体用於无别也,故曰此两者同出而异名。惟其一本而异名,所以该体用,贯动静,混然玄同,而无可指之迹,故曰同谓之玄矣。关尹子所谓不可侧不可分,故曰天、曰命、曰神、曰玄,合曰道是也。然则所谓玄亦直寄云耳,故又扫其滞玄之累而变化不穷矣,至哉。
Interpretation

“Boundary” (jiao) refers to an edge or limit: the aspect of the myriad things that they present to us and through which we can encounter them. Thus, “having desire” here means the directed longing of a mind that pursues things, not desire in general.

When Zhu Xi replied to Shen Zhuangzhong, he likewise said that “boundary” is like an edge, referring to the point where one meets things. Some in the past read “always without” and “always with” as separate phrases. It is better to understand them directly as “always without desire” and “always with desire.” If one insists on treating “always without” and “always with” as complete phrases in themselves, then “always without” may be taken to mean annihilating emptiness, while “always with” may fall into the common view that clings to worldly appearances. Neither reading is sufficient to know the substance and function of the wondrous Dao. Moreover, if “always without” is made a phrase on its own, the text later says, “desiring to observe its mystery.” That would mean that one has desires even in the state of “always without”—does that make sense?

Someone asked, “In the phrase ‘These two emerge together but have different names,’ most people read ‘these’ with the preceding sentence, while some connect ‘together’ with the sentence before it. Why?” The reply was: At the beginning of this chapter, “nameless” and “named” explain the Dao and Qi, the vital energy that forms and moves through the myriad things. Then “without desire” and “with desire” explain substance and function. At the end of the chapter, these should naturally be brought together in a summary.

The Dao and Qi, and substance and function, are indeed distinct, but they are not separate from one another or independent things in their own right. Without the aspect called “boundary,” the Dao could not appear in Qi; without Qi, the Dao would have nowhere to abide. Without substance, function could not operate; without function, substance could not become manifest. The Dao governs Qi but is not confined by it. Function appears within substance and has its source in substance. The Dao is substance, and Qi is function; substance and function emerge from one source, and principle and things are never cut off from one another. That is why the text says, “these two.”

Even within substance that is profound and still, with no visible trace, the clear and visible functions of the myriad things are already present. And even when those functions appear as all kinds of things, the deep, formless substance has not departed. It is only that stillness and movement have different names, and that matters of principle and things are distinguished: stillness, namelessness, and the absence of desire refer to substance; movement, name, and desire refer to function. Hence the text continues, “have different names.” This does not make stillness and movement into two separate foundations, nor does it blur substance and function until they are indistinguishable. It says that they emerge from one source but have different names.

Because their root is the same while their names differ, substance and function, stillness and movement, are all included within them and flow together as a whole, leaving no fixed trace that can be pointed to. Hence the text says, “together they are called mystery.” Guan Yinzi said that the Dao cannot be glimpsed from the side or divided apart; therefore it may be called “Heaven,” “destiny,” “spirit,” or “mystery,” and taken together these are called the Dao. He meant the same thing. Yet “mystery,” too, is only a provisional name. To cling to the name “mystery” would also become a constraint, so that attachment must be broken as well, allowing transformation to continue without end. How profound this principle is.

天下皆知美之为美,斯恶矣;皆知善之为善,斯不善矣。 才涉定名,直寄云耳,故又扫其滞玄之累而变化不穷矣,至哉。 天下皆知美之为美,斯恶矣;皆知善之为善,斯不善矣。 才涉定名,则有对待。相因相轧,如循连环。 故有无之相生,难易之相成,长短之相形,高下之相倾,声音之相和,前后之相随。 和,去声。此六对者,相因而有也。 是以圣人处无为之事,行不言之教。 处,上声。此无为也,惟不落於一偏,故六对不得而有。 万物作而不辞, 此则无不为也。 生而不有,为而不恃,功成不居。 此大而化之也。 夫惟不居,是以不去。 夫,音符。此其所以为圣人也。惟无为自然,则奚居奚去哉。 右二章河上名养身,此章进学者於名迹两忘之地也。 不尚贤,使民不争;不贵难得之货,使民不为盗;不为圣人也。惟无为自然,则奚居奚去哉。 右二章河上名养身,此章进学者於名迹两忘之地也。 不尚贤,使民不争;不贵难得之货,使民不为盗;不见可欲,使心不乱。
Interpretation

When everyone knows what is beautiful and takes it to be beautiful, the idea of ugliness arises along with it. When everyone knows what is good and takes it to be good, the idea of what is not good arises along with it.

Once fixed names and standards are assigned to things, relative distinctions take shape. These distinctions are only expressions carried by words. One must therefore also cast off the burden of clinging to mysterious formulations, so that understanding can change without constraint. This is indeed profound.

When everyone knows what is beautiful and takes it to be beautiful, the idea of ugliness arises along with it. When everyone knows what is good and takes it to be good, the idea of what is not good arises along with it.

Once fixed names are assigned to things, opposing distinctions appear. They depend on and constrain one another, forming a chain in which each gives rise to the next in a continuous cycle.

Thus being and nonbeing give rise to each other; difficulty and ease bring each other about; long and short show themselves through comparison; high and low depend on each other; sounds harmonize with one another; and what comes before is followed by what comes after.

Here, “harmonize” is pronounced with a falling tone. These six pairs of opposites exist only through their mutual dependence.

Therefore, the sage handles affairs through Wuwei (non-action) and teaches without relying on words.

Here, “handles” is pronounced with a rising tone. This is Wuwei: by clinging to neither side, one is no longer bound by the six pairs of opposites.

All things arise and grow; the sage does not reject them.

That is to say, there is nothing the sage fails to do.

The sage nurtures all things without claiming them as their own; acts without relying on their own ability; and completes their work without taking credit.

This is a state of great breadth, able to nurture and transform all things.

Precisely because the sage takes no credit, their achievements do not disappear.

Here, “for” is pronounced “fu.” This is what makes the sage a sage. When one follows nature and practices Wuwei, what achievement is there to claim, and what can depart?

The Heshang Gong commentary gives the title “Nurturing the Self” to the two chapters above. This chapter guides students toward forgetting fame and outward traces, and toward not clinging to external names and appearances.

Do not exalt those deemed worthy and capable, so that the people will not compete with one another. Do not prize rare and precious goods, so that the people will not steal. Do not display things that stir up desire, so that people’s minds will not be disturbed.

尚贤,名也。贵货,利也。惟无所徇,则心不外驰矣。夫所谓不见可砍者,非胶其目而不见也,使万境之维乎吾前,惟不见其有可欲之处,则情不附物,而此心澄然矣。所以铢视轩冕,泥看金璧,何欲之有? 是以圣人之治,虚其心,实其腹,弱其志,强其骨。常使民无知无欲, 强,渠良切。知,如字。虚心者,物我兼忘。实腹者,精神内守。物我兼忘,则虑不萌而志自弱矣,渠良切。知,如字。虚心者,物我兼忘。实腹者,精神内守。物我兼忘,则虑不萌而志自弱矣;精神内守,则气不馁而骨自强矣。虚心弱志,则民自无知;实腹强骨,则民自无欲也。 使夫知者不敢为也。为无为,则无不治矣。 夫音扶。知音智。圣人之道内以之治身,外以之治人,皆然。庄子所谓游心於淡,合气於漠,顺物自然,无容私焉,而天下治,是也。 右三章河上名安民。此章言忘贵尚,泯思虑,则复无为而合至理。 道冲而用之,或不盈。渊兮似万物之宗。
Interpretation

Esteeming the worthy and pursuing fame are ways of gaining renown; valuing wealth is a way of seeking profit. Only when we are not drawn along by such things does the mind cease to race outward in pursuit of them. To “not look at things that can stir desire” does not mean shutting one’s eyes and seeing nothing. It means that even when countless sights appear before us, we do not regard them as things worth pursuing. Then our feelings do not attach themselves to external things, and the heart can grow calm and clear. In that case, what desire could remain? High office and rank seem as light as a single zhu, and gold, jade, and other treasures seem like dirt.

Thus, when the sage governs the people, he makes their hearts empty and still and their lives full. He weakens their will to compete and grasp, and strengthens their bodies. He constantly ensures that the people have fewer clever schemes and fewer desires.

Here, “emptying the heart” means forgetting the distinction between things and oneself; “filling the belly” means keeping the spirit within. When the distinction between things and oneself is forgotten, thoughts do not arise, and the will to compete and grasp naturally weakens. When the spirit is kept within, the breath does not grow weak, and the body naturally becomes strong. Emptying the heart and weakening the will leaves the people with fewer clever schemes; filling the belly and strengthening the bones leaves them with fewer desires.

Make those who rely on their cleverness and delight in reckless action afraid to act rashly. Govern by following the Way of Wuwei (non-action), and nothing will be left ungoverned.

The sage’s Way is the same whether used for cultivating oneself inwardly or governing others outwardly. Zhuangzi’s words, “The mind and spirit roam at ease in a realm of simplicity; the breath joins with stillness; one follows the natural course of things without mixing in private intent, and so the world is governed,” express this same principle.

The above is Chapter Three, titled “Pacifying the People” in the Heshanggong commentary edition. This chapter teaches that by letting go of esteem for rank and wealth and dispelling thought, one can return to Wuwei and accord with the ultimate principle.

The Great Dao is empty and without form, yet in its activity it seems never to be exhausted. Deep and elusive, it seems to be the source of all things.

道体冲虚,漠然无朕,而其用则无所不该。虽天地之大,动植之繁,在於其中,亦莫盈其量矣。盖形有限而理无穷,此固道之大而无外,宝不盈也。然而其细亦无内,故虽一物一亦莫盈其量矣。盖形有限而理无穷,此固道之大而无外,宝不盈也。然而其细亦无内,故虽一物一事,亦莫不各具而毫发不遗,是又必近察乎此,而不可一向驰心空妙,以求其所谓大而不盈者,故云或也。或之者,疑之也。又继之曰渊兮似万物之宗,盖渊者虚澄深静而不可测之称。此其所以为万物之宗,本然不可定名,故云似也。盖即万物而观,则必有以为之宗主者,而实未尝有方体也。 挫其锐,解其纷,和其光,同其尘。湛兮似或存。 物莫不有是道,而人独能全之,故上圣教人修之以极其全也。夫锐者,人之体也。 挫其锐,解其纷,和其光,同其尘。湛兮似或存。
Interpretation

The Dao’s essential nature is empty and still, without form or trace, yet it can act and encompass everything. Heaven and earth are vast, and living things abound, all within the Dao’s embrace; yet they still cannot fill its scope. Physical forms have boundaries, but principle has no end. Thus the Dao is said to be vast, with nothing beyond it, as though no amount of filling could make it full. The Dao’s subtlety, too, has no boundaries, so each thing and each affair contains the Dao in its entirety, with nothing left out. To understand the Dao, one must observe concrete things closely, but must not let the mind wander only toward the empty, still, and mysterious, pursuing what is called limitless vastness. That is why the word “perhaps” is used here: it expresses uncertainty. The text then says, “Deep, it seems to be the ancestor of all things.” “Deep” describes something empty and clear, profound and still, beyond measurement. The Dao seems to be the source of all things, yet cannot be defined by any fixed name; hence the word “seems.” From the perspective of the myriad things, there appears to be a fundamental ruler, but the Dao itself has no fixed form.

“Blunt its sharpness, untangle its knots, soften its radiance, and mingle with its dust. Deep and clear, it seems to exist.” All things contain the Dao, and human beings can embody it fully. Therefore, the highest sages teach people to cultivate themselves so that their Dao nature can be fully revealed. “Sharpness” refers to the forceful, keen edge that shows itself in a person. To blunt it is to restrain that edge; to untangle its knots is to set disorder right; to soften its radiance is to temper one’s brilliance and make it gentle; to mingle with its dust is to blend into the world without seeming out of place. “Deep and clear, it seems to exist” describes the Dao as profound, still, and clear: it seems to be present, yet is difficult to grasp.

物莫不有是道,而人独能全之,故上圣教人修之以极其全也。夫锐者,人之才智外形而有芒角者也。纷者,事之节目繁会而盘错者也。挫则磨砻以去其圭角,而本然圆成者自若矣。解则如庖丁之理解,而纷则其族也。及乎磔然已解,而静一不紊者自若矣。此修於外,以养其中也。和其光,则光矣而不耀。同其尘,则磅砖万物以为一。此一於内以应其外也,及其至也,内外一如,而后浑然之全体在我,湛然常脊矣。似或者,不敢正指也。盖道无定体,而执之则失矣。 吾不知谁之子,象帝之先。 道者,天地万物之母,故曰不知谁之子。象者,有形之始。帝者,有物之主。曰先者,其未有象帝之先。 道者,天地万物之母,故曰不知谁之子。象者,有形之始。帝者,有物之主。曰先者,其未有形有物之前也。 右四章河上名无源。此章明妙本冲虚而其用不测也。 天地不仁,以万物为刍狗;圣人不仁,以百姓为刍狗。 仁者生之本,爱之理,三才之大德也。所谓不仁者,不滞於仁,犹上德不德之义也。盖天地之常,以其心普万物而无心;圣人之常,以其情顺万事而无情。所以不系累於当时,不留情於既往,如束刍为狗,祭祀之仪,适时而用,已事而弃,岂容心哉。此无私之极,仁之至也。
Interpretation

Nothing among the myriad things is without the Dao, yet only human beings can preserve it in its fullness. Thus the sages of antiquity taught people to cultivate themselves, so that the fullness of the Dao might be fully revealed.

“Blunt its sharpness” means wearing away the edge that shows when one’s intelligence is displayed, so that one’s originally complete nature remains as it is. “Untangle its knots” means cutting through disorder by following the natural lines of things, as Cook Ding—the skilled butcher—does. The disorder is like the interwoven sinews and bones of an ox. Once the knots are undone, the mind remains calm and focused, undisturbed. This is a way of cultivating the inner mind through the refinement of outward conduct.

“Temper its brightness” means having radiance without showing it off; “mingle with its dust” means blending as one with all things in the world. “Vast and blended” in “mingle with its dust” describes something broad and undifferentiated. The foregoing describes how, once the mind is focused, one responds to external things. When cultivation reaches its utmost, inner and outer become one seamless whole, and the complete nature returns to oneself, clear, tranquil, and constant.

The phrase “as if” is used because one dares not identify the Dao as any particular thing. The Dao has no fixed form; as soon as one clings to a definition of what it is, one loses it.

I do not know whose descendant the Dao is, but it existed before the Lord of Heaven.

The Dao is the source of Heaven, Earth, and the myriad things; hence it is said that we do not know whose descendant it is. “Image” refers to the beginning of things with form; “Lord” refers to the ruler of the myriad things; and “before” means before images and the myriad things appeared.

The Dao is the source of Heaven, Earth, and the myriad things; hence it is said that we do not know whose descendant it is. “Image” is the beginning of things with form, while “Lord” is the ruler of the myriad things. “Before” means before forms and the myriad things appeared.

Heshang Gong, the commentator on the Dao De Jing, calls the four chapters above “The Source-less.” This chapter explains that the Dao’s essence is profound and still, while its workings are beyond measure.

Heaven and Earth are not partial in their benevolence; they treat the myriad things as straw dogs used in sacrifice. The sage is not partial in benevolence; he treats the people as straw dogs used in sacrifice.

Benevolence is the root of life and the principle of love; it is an important virtue of the Three Powers: Heaven, Earth, and humanity. “Not benevolent” here does not mean having no love. It means not being bound by benevolence, as expressed in the phrase “highest De does not cling to De.” In their operation, Heaven and Earth nurture all things universally, without any thought of favoritism. In handling affairs, the sage responds to each one without being entangled in private feelings.

Thus they are not burdened by what is happening in the present, nor do they cling to what has already passed. This is like the straw dogs made for a sacrifice: they are brought out at the appointed time during the ritual, then set aside afterward, without anyone harboring private attachment to them. This is the utmost in impartiality, and the highest expression of benevolence.

天地之间,其犹橐钥乎。 橐,他各切,鞴也。钥,音药,束刍为狗,祭祀之仪,适时而用,已事而弃,岂容心哉。此无私之极,仁之至也。 天地之间,其犹橐钥乎。 橐,他各切,鞴也。钥,音药,管也。能受气鼓风之物也。天地之间,二气往来屈伸,犹此物之无心,虚而能受,应而不藏也。 虚而不屈,动而愈出。 陆、河上本皆释屈作竭。朱文公曰:有一物之不受,则虚而屈矣。有一物之不应,是动而不能出矣。 多言数穷,不如守中。 数,音朔,屡也。司马温公曰:能守中诚,不言而信也。苏文定公曰:见其动而愈出,不知其为虚中之报也,故告之云云。 右五章河上名虚用。此章先以天地圣人之事及远取诸物,以明其无私无报也,故告之云云。
Interpretation

Isn’t the space between Heaven and Earth just like a bellows?

“Tuō” refers to a bellows. Here, “yuè” also refers to a tubular instrument that can hold breath and stir up wind. Another commentator says that “yuè” is read as “yào” and refers to a grass dog used in sacrifice: a dog fashioned from straw, used at the appointed time during the rite and discarded once it is over, without anyone showing it special affection. The movement of breath between Heaven and Earth, its bending and extending, is like the working of a bellows. It has no private interests. It is empty, and so can hold breath; it responds to things as they arise, but does not keep the breath within it.

It is empty yet never exhausted; the more it works, the more breath it produces.

Both the Lu edition and the Heshang Gong Commentary explain “bending” as “being exhausted.” Zhu Xi says that if something cannot contain what comes to it, emptiness will be depleted; if it cannot respond to anything, it will produce nothing as it moves.

Too many words often carry the principle to its limit. Better to keep the heart-mind centered.

“Shù” is read as “shuò,” meaning repeatedly or frequently. Sima Guang says that one who can keep the heart-mind centered and sincere will be trusted even without speaking. Su Shi, meanwhile, says that people see how the more the bellows move, the more breath they produce, but do not realize this is because the space within them is empty. He therefore urges people to speak little and keep to the center.

This is Chapter Five of the Dao De Jing. The Heshang Gong Commentary titles it “The Use of Emptiness.” The chapter first takes Heaven and Earth and the sage as examples, then draws comparisons with the bellows and other things to show that they are without self-interest and seek no reward.

右五章河上名虚用。此章先以天地圣人之事及远取诸物,以明其无私无为。虚中之体既立,则其用自然不息也。不可徒徇於用,而不知反求其本之所以然,故教之讷言守中,,以为入德之门也。夫中即道也,即其体则圆同太虚,卓然而无所偏倚之称。以其用则周流无间,在於事物,各无过不及之谓也。守则学以求至者之事也,及乎功用纯熟,则守底瞥地脱落,当体澄然,中斯立焉。或云中者,中宫黄庭、北极太渊也。谓存神中宫,所以养胎元,袭气母之要也。此又就形器而言中,亦犹北极在天之中,居其所而为玄浑之枢纽,则所谓中神中宫,所以养胎元,袭气母之要也。此又就形器而言中,亦犹北极在天之中,居其所而为玄浑之枢纽,则所谓中者,於是乎有以寓而可见矣。然枢纽之所以处,而元化之所以不息者,又实赖乎中而后能也。若见得彻,则横说坚说,皆在其中矣。 谷神不死,是谓玄牝。 谷神者,谓其体之虚而无所不受,而其用则应而不可测也。以其纲纪造化,流行古今,妙乎万物而生生不息,故曰不死。此即真一之精,阴阳之主,故曰玄牝。此言理寓於气,而玄阳也,牝阴也。盖阳变而玄妙莫测,阴合而生生不穷故也。文公曰:至妙之理而有生生之意焉,程子所以取此说。 玄牝之门,是谓天地根。
Interpretation

In the first five chapters, Heshang Gong titled this chapter “The Use of Emptiness.” It begins by drawing on the actions of Heaven and Earth and the sage, then offers comparisons with various things at a distance, to show that Heaven and Earth and the sage act without selfishness or force. Once the empty and tranquil substance is established, its function naturally operates without end. Yet one must not pursue function alone without returning to seek its root. This is why the chapter teaches people to speak with care and hold to the center, as a way into the gate of De.

“The center” is the Dao. In its substance, it is perfectly integrated and vast, like the Great Void, without bias in any direction. In its function, it flows on without ceasing; as it takes shape in particular things, it means having neither excess nor deficiency. “Holding to” means the effort of study and cultivation by which one strives to reach this state. Once this effort is fully mature, even the thought of deliberately holding to it suddenly falls away, the substance naturally becomes clear, and “the center” is established.

Some also interpret “the center” as the Central Palace and Yellow Court, places within the body used in cultivation, or as the Northern Pole and Great Abyss, terms from Daoist Neidan (internal alchemy). They hold that preserving Shen in the Central Palace nurtures the embryonic origin and receives the source of Qi. This explains “the center” in terms of the tangible body, just as the Northern Pole lies at the center of the heavens, resting in its place and serving as the pivot of Heaven and Earth’s movement. Thus “the spirit in the center, in the Central Palace” becomes the key to nurturing the embryonic origin and receiving the mother of Qi. Yet the pivot’s stability and the ceaseless transformation of primordial Qi ultimately still depend on “the center.” Whoever fully understands this will find that, however one approaches it, nothing lies outside it.

“The Valley Spirit never dies; this is called the Mysterious Female.”

“The Valley Spirit” means that the substance is empty and tranquil, able to contain all things, while its function responds to each circumstance in ways that are difficult to fathom. It governs creation and transformation, runs through past and present, and brings forth and nurtures all things, so that the impulse of life never ceases. Hence it is said to “never die.” It is the “essence of the True One” and the master of Yin-Yang transformation; therefore it is called the “Mysterious Female.” The point here is that principle is embodied in Qi: “mysterious” refers to Yang, whose transformations are subtle and unfathomable; “female” refers to Yin, which joins with Yang and brings forth life without end. Zhu Xi said that this passage speaks of the meaning of ceaseless generation contained within the most subtle principle, and Cheng Yi likewise accepted this interpretation.

“The gate of the Mysterious Female is called the root of Heaven and Earth.”

门犹众妙之门,天地万物皆从此出。根犹草木之根,人所不可见,而说。 玄牝之门,是谓天地根。 门犹众妙之门,天地万物皆从此出。根犹草木之根,人所不可见,而实为生生之本。谓阴阳之阖辟而为天地之本也,其在人身则元宫牝府,乃神炁之要会,天地同根者也。曹道冲曰:玄者,杳冥而藏神。牝者,冲和而藏炁也。 绵绵若存,用之不勤。 曹曰:绵者,冲和不绝之谓也。道贵无进,谓之有则滞,谓之无则顽,故云若存。文定曰:绵绵,微而不绝也。若存,存而不可见也。能体此,虽终日用之而不劳矣。 右六章河上名成象。此章言道之体用,炁存,存而不可见也。能体此,虽终日用之而不劳矣。
Interpretation

The “Gate of the Mysterious Female” is like a gateway through which many wondrous things emerge. The “Root of Heaven and Earth” is like the root of a plant: though invisible to the human eye, it is the foundation from which all things grow and change. These phrases refer to the opening and closing, and the transformations, of Yin-Yang, which form the foundation of Heaven and Earth. In the human body, this corresponds to the “Palace of Origin and Abode of the Female,” an important place where Shen (spirit) and Qi (vital energy) gather. Thus, Heaven, Earth, and humanity are said to share the same root. Cao Daochong explains: “‘Mysterious’ refers to a place that is deep and unfathomable, where Shen is hidden; ‘female’ refers to a place that is empty, quiet, and peaceful, where Qi is hidden.”

“Continuous and seemingly present; use it without strain” means that the Dao’s activity is subtle and enduring: it seems to be there, yet leaves no visible trace. Cao Daochong says that “continuous” means a calm and peaceful Qi that flows without interruption. The Dao should not be deliberately augmented. To say that it exists is to bind it; to say that it does not exist is to fall into rigid thinking. Thus, one can only say that it is “seemingly present.” Wen Ding explains that “continuous” means subtle and never-ending, while “seemingly present” means that it is there, though invisible. Those who can experience and follow this state can put it to use throughout the day without feeling weary.

Heshang Gong titled this chapter “Forming Images.” The chapter discusses the Dao’s substance and function: Qi continues to be present, yet does not show itself. Those who understand and experience this can put it to use all day without toil.

右六章河上名成象。此章言道之体用,炁之阴阳,形之动静,而人则体之也。盖因玄牝之生生不已,然后知谷神之不死。因天地之动静有常,然后识玄牝之所为。而谷神以理言,玄牝以气言,天地以形言。盖道之妙用,不外乎阴阳,而其所以然者,则未尝倚於阴阳,乃宰制气形而贯通无问者也。或问:《灵枢经》云:天谷元神,守之自真。上玄下牝,子母相亲。及鼻为玄,吸炁而上通於天;口为牝,纳津而下通於地。今皆不取其说,何耶?曰:是则专局於人身而言也,此章乃直从万化原头说起。盖此道宰御阴阳,生育天地,而即阴阳之宰,为人之性,即天地之炁,为人之体,故近取诸身,此理实同。自口鼻之从万化原头说起。盖此道宰御阴阳,生育天地,而即阴阳之宰,为人之性,即天地之炁,为人之体,故近取诸身,此理实同。自口鼻之说,又转而为丹诀,而后学因之,为说愈支离矣。如张平叔云:玄牝之门世罕知,只凭口鼻妄施为。饶君吐纳经千息,争得金乌搦兔儿。薛道光云:玄牝之门切要知,几人下手几人疑。君还不信长生理,但去霜间看接黎。朱真人云:玄牝之门号金母,先天先地藏真土。含元抱息乃生成,一炁虚无亘今古。又云:时人要识真玄牝,不在心兮不在肾。穷取生身受炁初,莫怪天机都漏尽。吕纯阳云:玄牝之门不易言,从来此处会坤乾。呼为玉室名通圣,号曰金坑理会玄。用似日魂投月魄,来如海脉涌潮泉。机关识破浑闲事,万里纵横一少年一此虽於方术以为至妙,然宗旨之论,则序中巳发之矣。《列子》曰:黄帝书云云,乃全载此一章。盖古有一此虽於方术以为至妙,然宗旨之论,则序中巳发之矣。《列子》曰:黄帝书云云,乃全载此一章。盖古有是书,老子述而不作也。而葛仙公《内传》又曰:黄帝时老君为广成子,为帝说此经,故帝着书乃引此章。
Interpretation

This chapter discusses the substance and workings of the Dao (the Way), the Yin-Yang changes of Qi (vital energy), and the movement and stillness of the body. It also points out that human beings embody these same principles. The Mysterious Female, the source from which Yin and Yang bring forth all things, gives rise to life without end; from this we can understand that the Valley Spirit, the Dao’s wondrous efficacy, does not perish. Heaven and Earth move and rest according to their own enduring patterns; from this we can understand the workings of the Mysterious Female. Here, the Valley Spirit is discussed in terms of principle, the Mysterious Female in terms of Qi, and Heaven and Earth in terms of form. The Dao’s wondrous workings never depart from Yin and Yang, yet the Dao itself does not depend on Yin and Yang. It governs Qi and form and runs through them both.

Someone asked: “The Ling Shu Jing says that if the Original Spirit of the Celestial Valley is guarded and never lost, one can return to the Real. Above is the Mysterious; below is the Female, and the two are as close as mother and child. It also says that the nose is the Mysterious: inhaled breath rises through it to connect with Heaven. The mouth is the Female: fluids are received through it and descend to connect with Earth. Why does this chapter not use those explanations?” The answer is: “Those explanations speak only of the human body, whereas this chapter begins with the source of the transformations of all things. The Dao governs Yin and Yang and brings forth Heaven and Earth. As the ruler of Yin and Yang, it is a person’s nature; when the Qi of Heaven and Earth gathers and forms, it becomes a person’s body. So although the discussion may begin with bodily parts such as the mouth and nose, the underlying principle is the same.”

Later, some took the explanations about the mouth and nose and developed them into formulas for alchemical practice. Their successors built on these in turn, making the interpretations ever more elaborate. Zhang Ping-shu said that few people in the world truly understand the Gate of the Mysterious Female; they merely act on their own notions, relying on the mouth and nose. Even if they practice breathing exercises a thousand times, they may still fail to achieve the union of the Golden Crow and Jade Rabbit. Xue Dao-guang said that the Gate of the Mysterious Female is of the utmost importance, yet few dare to undertake the work. If you doubt the principle of longevity, look at the Jie Li among the frost. Master Zhu said that the Gate of the Mysterious Female is also called the Golden Mother, and that it contains the True Earth that existed before Heaven and Earth. It holds the Origin and embraces the breath; all things arise from it. A single Qi, empty and undifferentiated, runs through past and present. He also said that the true Mysterious Female is neither in the heart nor in the kidneys: one must trace it back to the very beginning, when a person first received Qi and came into being. Lü Chun-yang said that the Gate of the Mysterious Female is difficult to describe. It is where the Yin and Yang of Heaven and Earth meet, and is also called the Jade Chamber or the Golden Pit. The interaction of Yin and Yang is like the Qi of the sun and moon coming together, or the surging of the tides. Once one understands its mechanism, one can use it freely.

These explanations are regarded as profound in the arts of cultivation, but the fundamental purpose of this book has already been set out in its preface. The Liezi records that this chapter appears in full in the writings of the Yellow Emperor. This shows that such a book existed in ancient times, and that Laozi transmitted it rather than composed it. The Inner Tradition of Ge Xiangong further says that in the time of the Yellow Emperor, the Lord Lao manifested as Guang Chengzi and taught him this scripture. That is why the Yellow Emperor quoted this chapter in his writings.

天长地久。天地所以能长且久者,以其不自生,故能长生。 不生者,生之本,故云生生者,不生是也。凡丽形数者,必有限量。今云天长地久者,特以人所见者言之耳。 是以圣人后其身,而身先;外其身,而身存。 此屈己而忘我,固非计私而为利,乃理势之长地久者,特以人所见者言之耳。 是以圣人后其身,而身先;外其身,而身存。 此屈己而忘我,固非计私而为利,乃理势之自然。盖牧谦而光,忘形而寿。 非以其无私耶?故能成其私。 天地不与物竞生,圣人不与人争得,所以大过人矣。至公一理,不可磨灭,乃长久也。 右七章河上名韬光。此章明无我之旨,乃可久之道也。 上善若水。水善利万物而不争,人之所恶,故几於道。 处,上声。恶,去声。几音机,近也。守柔处下,乃俗之所恶,而实近於道。然丽乎形,则於道有间,故曰几也。 居善,近也。守柔处下,乃俗之所恶,而实近於道。然丽乎形,则於道有间,故曰几也。 居善地, 卑以自牧,犹就下也。 心善渊, 渊静而虚明,此皆先存其体也。盖必有牧谦渊静之德,然后五者之功用所以行也。 与善仁, 与虚而不与盈,泽博而不求报,无私而已。 言善信,
Interpretation

Heaven and Earth can endure because they do not live solely for themselves; thus they last. Anything with a definite form and limited quantity has an end. The phrase “Heaven lasts long and Earth endures” refers to what people can observe.

Therefore, the sage places himself behind others and so comes to stand before them; he does not regard himself as most important and so preserves himself. This means yielding and forgetting the self, not calculating for private gain. It is the result of following the natural development of things. Humility can bring a person into the light, while letting go of attachment to bodily form can help one endure.

Is this not precisely because there is no selfishness? Thus the sage achieves his own fulfillment. Heaven and Earth do not contend with the myriad things for survival, and the sage does not contend with others for advantage; therefore, they can surpass ordinary people. The principle of utmost impartiality does not perish, and so it endures.

The above is Chapter Seven of the Dao De Jing (Classic of the Dao and De), which Heshang Gong titled “Concealing One’s Radiance.” This chapter explains the principle of selflessness, showing that it is the way to longevity.

The highest goodness is like water. Water is good at nourishing the myriad things, yet does not contend with them. It dwells in low places that people dislike, and so is close to the Dao (the Way). “Close” does not mean identical to the Dao: water still has form, so it is only near to the Dao.

In one’s dwelling, be like water and rest content in low places, maintaining oneself through humility. These qualities must first take root within before they can be put into practice.

Let the mind be still and clear like a deep pool. This, too, means cultivating the inner foundations first.

In dealing with others, be generous and benevolent: when giving, remain open and humble, without becoming self-satisfied; spread blessings widely without seeking repayment, simply harboring no selfish intent.

In speech, be truthful and trustworthy.

诚信之言,不待期而符契。如潮汐之无爽,及塞必止-,决必流,鉴妍媸而不妄,行险地而不失也。 政善治, 正容而物悟,清静而民化,亦犹平中准而涤众垢也。 事善能, 趋变任事,各当其可,犹随器方圆,任载悟,清静而民化,亦犹平中准而涤众垢也。 事善能, 趋变任事,各当其可,犹随器方圆,任载轻重。及避碍就通,而不滞於一也。 动善时。 时行时止,犹春泮而冬凝。 夫惟不争,故无尤矣。 有德有功而不争,乃德之至,此其所以为上善。夫如是,复何尤哉?尤,过也,怨也。 右八章河上名易性。此章以水喻上善,明不争之行也。 持而盈之,不如其已;揣而锐之,不可长保。 已音以,止也。揣,初委切,治也。文定曰:知盈之必溢而以持固之,不若不盈之安也。知说之必折而以揣先之,不如揣之不可必恃也#1。若夫圣人无积,尚安有盈?循理而行,尚安有锐?无盈则无所用持,无锐则无所用揣矣。 金玉满堂,莫之能守;富贵而骄,自遗其咎。功成,名遂,身退,天之道。
Interpretation

Trustworthy words need no promise to prove them; they are as reliable as a contract. Like the tides, they arrive on time without fail: when they meet a blocked bank, they stop; when they meet a breach, they rush through. They reflect beauty and ugliness without distortion, and pass through dangerous places without losing their way.

Those skilled in governing affairs of state put themselves in order, and all things are thereby transformed; they remain calm and still, and the people naturally come to follow them. This is like a level rule that can wash away many kinds of grime.

Those skilled in handling affairs can adapt to change and take on all kinds of tasks, making each one fitting and appropriate. They take the shape of a vessel as their guide, making things square or round accordingly, and arrange what they carry according to its weight. When they meet an obstacle, they avoid it and turn toward an open path, without clinging to a single method.

Those skilled in action know how to seize the right moment: they act when it is time to act and stop when it is time to stop, like snow and ice melting in spring and freezing in winter, each changing with the season.

Because they do not contend, they make no mistakes and invite no resentment. To possess De and achieve merit without contending with others is the highest form of De; this is the highest good. If one can do this, what fault or resentment could there be? “Fault” means error or resentment.

In the Heshanggong commentary, the preceding eight chapters are titled “Easy Nature.” This chapter uses water as a metaphor for the highest good and explains the way of living without contention.

Holding on to a state of fullness is not as good as stopping at what is sufficient. If something is sharpened too keenly, it is difficult to keep it that way for long. Here, “yi” is read as “yi,” meaning to stop; “chuai” is read as “chuweiqie,” meaning to grind or polish. Wending says: knowing that what is full will inevitably overflow, yet forcing it to remain full, is not as good as seeking no fullness and being content with what is enough. Knowing that what is too sharp will eventually break, yet continuing to sharpen it, means one should not rely on sharpness as something dependable. The sage does not accumulate private possessions, so where could there be fullness? They follow the course of things, so where could there be deliberate striving for sharpness? With no fullness, there is no need to struggle to maintain it; with no sharpness, there is no need to fear it will be damaged.

When gold and jade fill the hall, no one can guard them forever. Arrogance after attaining wealth and status brings calamity upon oneself. To withdraw once one’s achievements are complete and one’s reputation established—this accords with the Way of Heaven.

无盈则无所用持,无锐则无所用揣矣。 金玉满堂,莫之能守;富贵而骄,自遗其咎。功成,名遂,身退,天之道。 遗,唯季切,贻也。能体四时代谢之序,亦可以见天道。刘师立曰:盈则必虚,戒之在满;锐则必钝,戒之在进;金玉必累,戒之在责;富贵易淫,戒之在傲。功成名遂必危,在乎知止而不失其正。此言深欲救人,谓非必处山林绝人事,然后可以入道,虽居乎富贵功名之域,皆可勤而行之。 右九章河迅名运夷。此章明修身当体自然之理。 载营魄抱一,能无离乎? 离,平声。此《资福延寿经》所谓守炼精魄,自然冲冲之意。载乃登乘之义,古文用字多有此例。魄乃形魄精魄之谓。营魄抱一,犹卫形葆精之义。盖以魂御魄,抱一而不离也。 专气之意。载乃登乘之义,古文用字多有此例。魄乃形魄精魄之谓。营魄抱一,犹卫形葆精之义。盖以魂御魄,抱一而不离也。 专气致柔,能如婴儿乎? 此袭气母之义。文公曰:专非守之谓,只是专一无间断,纯纯全全,如婴儿然,了无知之之心,则柔亦至矣。盖才有一毫发露,便是刚了。 涤除玄览,能无疵乎? 此洗心藏密之义。涤,洗也。除,遣也。玄览,心照妙理也。疵,病也。夫玄妙之见不除,是为解缚;涤除之迹犹存,是为觉碍。无疵则法爱忘而能所双泯矣。 爱民治国,能无为乎?
Interpretation

“Yi” is pronounced “Wei Ji Qie” and means “to give” or “to leave something to someone.” If one can understand the order of the seasons’ turning and the cycles of change among the myriad things, one can thereby come to know the Dao of Heaven—the patterns by which nature operates. Master Liu says: What is full will become empty, so beware of complacency; what is too sharp will eventually grow dull, so beware of pressing ahead too aggressively. Gold and jade can invite calamity, so do not covet them; wealth and rank can lead to indulgence, so beware of arrogance. Success and fame often bring danger in their wake. The key is to know when enough is enough and never stray from the right path. These words earnestly urge people to understand that cultivating the Dao does not necessarily mean living in the mountains and forests, cut off from human affairs. Even amid wealth, rank, and fame, one can still cultivate diligently.

The above is Chapter Nine, titled “Moving Along the Level Way.” This chapter explains that self-cultivation should understand and follow the principles of nature.

“Can you carry the body and embrace the One without letting them part?”

“Part” is pronounced with a level tone. “Carry” means to mount or bear, a usage common in ancient texts. “Po” refers to the corporeal Po, the essence of the body. “Carrying the Po and embracing the One” is like protecting the body and nurturing Jing and Qi. It also means letting the Hun govern the Po, so that body and mind hold fast to the One—the state of undivided purity—without separating. This is close in meaning to the Jing on Bestowing Blessings and Extending Life, which speaks of guarding and refining the Po essence until it naturally becomes full and harmonious.

“By concentrating Qi and attaining softness, can you be like an infant?”

This means keeping Qi focused and making body and mind gentle. Master Wen says: “Concentrating” does not mean holding on deliberately; it means remaining single-minded without interruption, whole and unmixed. Like an infant, one has no deliberately cultivated desire for knowledge, and so softness can naturally reach its utmost. The moment even a trace of sharpness shows, one has already turned toward hardness.

“By cleansing and clearing the dark mirror, can you be free of flaws?”

This means washing away thoughts and keeping inner insight deeply concealed. “Cleansing” means washing clean; “clearing” means letting go. The “dark mirror” refers to the mind’s perception of profound, mysterious principles. “Flaws” are faults. If one does not let go of attachment to subtle insights, one becomes bound by one’s own understanding. If one remains attached to the practice of “cleansing,” one is obstructed by the traces of cultivation. Free of these faults, one can forget attachment to the principles of the teaching, and the perceiving mind and the object perceived can dissolve together.

“Can you care for the people and govern the state through Wuwei (non-action)?”

此言推其绪余以及人。虽至於爱民治国,一以刍狗遇之可也。 天门开阖,能为雌乎? 此言出入往来酬酢变化而主静也为乎? 此言推其绪余以及人。虽至於爱民治国,一以刍狗遇之可也。 天门开阖,能为雌乎? 此言出入往来酬酢变化而主静也。天者,自然之门。开阖者,变化之道。雌静者,蓄养之德。为雌或作无雌,谓雌静而不滞於静乃无雌也。或云无雌,乃无阴邪以间之也。 明白四达,能无知乎? 此寂感无边方也。文定曰:盖是心无所不知,而未尝有能知之心。夫心一而已,苟又有知之之心,则是二也。上三者言精气神,则修身之事也。乃存体以政用,谓尽己之性以至於命,而极其大而化之之地也。下三者言其用效,则治人之事也。乃即用以归体,尽人物之性而见诸事业之间,乃至与天为徒,之性以至於命,而极其大而化之之地也。下三者言其用效,则治人之事也。乃即用以归体,尽人物之性而见诸事业之间,乃至与天为徒,而精神四达,上下并流,故功参化育而不居,以大其无我之公,此圣人之能事'天道之玄功也,所以下文乃申言之。 生之畜之,生而不有,为而不恃,长而不宰,是谓玄德。 长,上声。畜,许六切,养也。潜被默通,不自彰显,忘功忘物,洞入冥极。
Interpretation

This passage means that when the principle of Wuwei (non-action) is extended to others, even when caring for the people and governing the state, one can regard them like straw dogs used in ritual offerings, without favoring or clinging to them out of personal preference.

“Gate of Heaven” refers to the portal through which nature’s movements and transformations unfold; “opening and closing” refers to the coming and going of change. “Can you remain the female?” asks whether one can preserve softness and stillness, and remain in the receptive position. Here, “feminine stillness” is the virtue of nurturing all things: though soft and still, it does not remain fixed in stillness. Another interpretation holds that “without the female” means that no baleful Yin energy disrupts things from within.

“To be clear and perceptive in every direction, yet remain free of knowing” means that the mind is still and responds without limit: it can see clearly and understand fully, yet does not cling to the thought “I am knowing.” Wending says that the mind knows everything but does not give rise to a mind that takes itself to be capable of knowing. If it then clings to “I am knowing,” the mind seems to split in two.

The first three questions concern Jing (essence), Qi (vital energy), and Shen (spirit), and describe the work of cultivating oneself: hold fast to the root so its function can unfold, nurture one’s nature, and thereby understand one’s heavenly mandate. The final three questions concern how this work manifests in its effects on governing others: return from practical action to the root, allow the nature of people and all things to be fully realized, and put this into practice through one’s undertakings. In this way, one can accord with the Dao of Heaven, with spirit flowing freely between above and below, taking part in the creative transformation of Heaven and Earth without claiming credit. With a selfless heart, one brings about the common good. This is the realm a sage can attain, and the profound, mysterious operation of the Dao of Heaven; the passage that follows therefore explains it further.

“To give life and nurture” means to bring all things to life and nourish them. “To give life yet not possess” means to bring forth and nourish all things without claiming ownership of them. “To act yet not rely on one’s achievements” means to accomplish things without depending on the credit for them. “To help things grow yet not rule over them” means to enable all things to mature without dominating them. This is called “profound De,” a deep and hidden virtue. Here, “grow” is pronounced with the falling-rising tone, and “nurture” means to nourish. Profound De remains concealed, silently connecting all things; it does not display itself, forgets its achievements and external things, and penetrates into the depths of mystery.

右十章河上名能为。此章为说不一。如刘泾曰:黄帝云:动以营生谓之魂。碧虚曰:营,魂也。《白虎通》云:营营,不定貌也。载,乘也。谓使形常乘载魂魄,抱守太和纯一之气,令无散离也。文定曰:圣人性定而神凝,不为物迁,虽以魄为舍,而神欲行,魄无不从,则神常载魄矣。众人以物役性,神昏而不治,则神听於曰:圣人性定而神凝,不为物迁,虽以魄为舍,而神欲行,魄无不从,则神常载魄矣。众人以物役性,神昏而不治,则神听於魄。耳目用於声色,口鼻劳於臭味。魄所欲行而神从之,则魄常载神矣。故教之以抱神载魄,使两者不相离也。文公曰:以车承人谓之载,古今世俗之通言也。以人登车亦谓之载,则古文史类多有之。如《汉纪》云:刘章从谒者与载。韩集云:妇人以孺子载。盖皆此意。营者,字与荧同,而为晶明光炯之意。其所谓魄,亦若予论於《九歌》耳。盖以魂阳动而魄阴静,魂火二、而魄水一,谓以魂加魄,以动守静,以火迫水,以二守一,而不相离,如人登车而常载於其上,则魂安静而魄精明,火不燥加魄,以动守静,以火迫水,以二守一,而不相离,如人登车而常载於其上,则魂安静而魄精明,火不燥而水不缢,固长生久视之要也。但为之说者不能深考,如河上公以营为魂,则固非字义,而又并言人载魂魄之上以得生,当爱养之,则又失其文意。独其载字之义,粗为得之。若王辅嗣以载为处,以营魄为人所常居之处。则亦河上之意。至於近世而苏子由、王元泽之说出焉。洪庆善亦谓阳气充魄为魂,魂能运动则其生全矣。而且皆以载为以车承人之义矣,是不惟非其文意,且若此,则是将使神常劳动动而魄亦不得以少息。虽幸免於物欲沉溺之累,而窈冥之中,精一之妙反为强阳所挟,以驰骛於纷拏胶扰之涂,卒以陷於众人伤生损寿之域,而不自知也。《九歌辩证》或问魂魄之义,曰:子产反为强阳所挟,以驰骛於纷拏胶扰之涂,卒以陷於众人伤生损寿之域,而不自知也。《九歌辩证》或问魂魄之义,曰:子产有言:物生始化曰魄,既生魄阳曰魂。孔子曰:气也者,神之威也。魄也者,鬼之盛也。郑氏注曰:嘘吸出入者,气也。耳目之精明为魄。气则魂之谓也。《淮南子》曰:天气为魂,地气为魄。高诱注曰:魂,人阳神也。魄,人阴神也。此数说者,其於魂魄之义详矣。盖尝推之物生始化云者,谓受形之初,精血之聚,其间有灵者名之曰魄也。既生魄阳曰魂者,既生此魄,便有暖气,其问有神者,名之曰魂也。二者既合,然化云者,谓受形之初,精血之聚,其间有灵者名之曰魄也。既生魄阳曰魂者,既生此魄,便有暖气,其问有神者,名之曰魂也。二者既合,然后有物。《易》所谓精气为物者是也。及其散也,则魂游而为神,魄降而为鬼矣。说者乃不考此,而但据左疏之言,其以神灵分阴阳者,虽若有理,但以嘘吸之动者为魄,则失之矣。其言附形之灵,附气之神,似亦近是,又谓魄识少而魂识多,则非也。但有运用畜藏之异耳。扬子云又以日月之光明论之,则固以月之体质为为魄,则失之矣。其言附形之灵,附气之神,似亦近是,又谓魄识少而魂识多,则非也。但有运用畜藏之异耳。扬子云又以日月之光明论之,则固以月之体质为魄,而日之光耀为魂也。谓日以其光加於月魄而为之明,如人登车而载於其上也。故曰月未望,则载魄于西。既望则终魄于东,其趋於日乎。言月之方生,则以日之光加被於魄之西,而渐满其东,以至於望而后圆。及既望矣,则以日之光终守其魄之东,而渐亏其西,以至於晦而后尽,盖月迩日以为明,未望则,以至於望而后圆。及既望矣,则以日之光终守其魄之东,而渐亏其西,以至於晦而后尽,盖月迩日以为明,未望则日在其右,既望则日在其左,故各向其所在而受光,如民向君之化而成
Interpretation

This chapter is titled "Neng Wei" (Capability) in the Heshanggong Zhangju (Heshanggong's Annotated Commentary). Interpretations of it have long varied.

Liu Jing says that the Yellow Emperor's phrase "moving to sustain life" (dong yi ying sheng) means that human activity is what keeps life going. Bi Xu, however, holds that ying refers to the hun (ethereal soul). The Baihutong (Comprehensive Discussions in the White Tiger Hall) says that yingying describes a restless heart-mind. Zai (to carry) means to bear a load. On this reading, the body is made to carry the hun and po (corporeal soul), so that they keep to the pure unity of Taihe (Great Harmony) qi and do not scatter or separate.

Wending explains that the sage's heart-mind is settled and his shen (spirit) concentrated, so he is not drawn along by external things. Although the body is the dwelling place of the po, when the shen wants to act, the po follows, so it is the shen that carries the po. The ordinary person, by contrast, is governed by external things, and his heart-mind is in disorder. The ears and eyes chase sounds and colors, the mouth and nose labor over fragrances and flavors, and whatever the po wants, the shen follows, so the po ends up leading the shen. Hence the teaching to "embrace the shen and carry the po," so that the two are never separated.

Wengong points out that "using a vehicle to carry a person" is a common expression both in ancient and modern usage, and that older books also describe a person boarding a carriage as zai. He then examines in detail the meanings of ying and hun-po, and criticizes the earlier commentators.

The author holds that ying is interchangeable with ying (the homophone meaning "glowing"), and so carries the sense of bright, radiant light. The hun belongs to yang and governs movement; the po belongs to yin and governs stillness. The hun is like fire and the po is like water. Zai should therefore be understood as attaching the hun to the po, using movement to guard stillness, fire relying on water, and holding the two as one, so that they do not separate, just as a person who has boarded a carriage sits settled within it. In this way the hun becomes calm, the po becomes clear and perceptive, the fire does not blaze fiercely, and the water does not run dry. The author regards this as the essential principle of long life and enduring vitality.

The author argues that Heshanggong's reading of ying as hun is not appropriate in terms of the word's meaning, and that his explanation of the passage as the body carrying the hun and po in order to nourish life does not fit the original text. Wang Bi reads zai as "dwelling place," taking yingpo to mean the place where a person normally resides, and the author considers this close to Heshanggong's interpretation. As for Su Ziyou, Wang Yuanzhi, Hong Qingshan and others, who all read zai as using a carriage to carry a person, the author holds that they too depart from the sense of the text. If the shen is kept in constant active operation, the po cannot find rest. Even if one avoids being immersed in desire, the subtle and pure shen may be swept along by an overpowering yang energy, driven about in confusion and agitation, and in the end one injures one's life without realizing it.

The Jiuge Bianzheng (Examination of the Nine Songs), in discussing the hun and po, cites Zi Chan, Confucius, Zheng Xuan and the Huainanzi. Zi Chan says that when things first come into being, the po comes first, and only after the po is formed does yang energy arise; the spiritual intelligence within that yang energy is called the hun. Confucius says that qi is the potency of the shen, and the po is the gathering of the ghostly. Zheng Xuan explains that the breath moving in and out is qi, the clear perception of the ears and eyes is the po, and qi refers to the hun. The Huainanzi says that the qi of Heaven is the hun and the qi of Earth is the po. Gao You's commentary explains that the hun is the yang shen of a person and the po is the yin shen of a person.

On this basis, the author explains that when life first takes shape, the essence and blood gather, and the part within them that possesses spiritual intelligence is called the po. Once the po is formed, it produces warm yang energy, and the part within that which possesses shen is called the hun. Only when the hun and po are joined does a living bodily form come into being. The saying in the Yijing (Book of Changes) that "the essence and qi make up things" refers to this same principle. When life disperses, the hun drifts away and becomes shen, and the po sinks down and becomes a ghost.

The author holds that some commentators who identify the movement of breathing with the po are mistaken. To call the spirit that attaches to the form the po, and the shen that attaches to the qi the hun, comes somewhat closer to the truth. Yet to say that the po has little perception and the hun has much is also not right. The difference between hun and po lies in their functions and in the ways they are stored.

Yang Xiong uses the light and darkness of the sun and moon to illustrate the hun and po. The body of the moon is the po, and the brilliance of the sun is the hun. When the sunlight falls on the lunar po, the moon shows its brightness, just as a person who has boarded a carriage is carried by it. Before the moon is full, it gradually receives sunlight. After the full moon, the sunlight shines on the other side of the lunar po, and the face of the moon gradually wanes until it is entirely gone at the end of the month. The moon receives its light by approaching the sun: before the full moon, the sun is on the moon's right, and after it, the sun is on the left. So the moon takes its light according to the sun's position, just as the common people receive the instruction of their ruler and are thereby brought to accomplishment.

俗,此魂魄之说也。 三十辐共一毂,当其无,有车之用; 辐音福,轮中晓毂,众坚木也。毂,古木切,乃外受众辐所会,中空受轴以为枢者。当,丁浪切,即也。无者,空虚处也,谓辐毂相奏以为车,即其中之虚,然后有车之用。文公曰:无,是毂中空处。惟其空中,故能受轴而运转不穷。庄子所谓枢始得其环中以应无穷,亦此,即其中之虚,然后有车之用。文公曰:无,是毂中空处。惟其空中,故能受轴而运转不穷。庄子所谓枢始得其环中以应无穷,亦此意也。 埏埴以为器,当其无,有器之用; 埏,始然切,和土也。埴,市力切,粘土也。皆陶者之事。此亦因其器中空无,然后可以容物,乃为有用之器,下意同。 凿户牖以为室,当其无,有室之用。 凿,穿也。半门曰户,门旁窗曰牖。 故有之以为利,无之以为用。
Interpretation

The term "su" (common, popular) refers to the popular belief in the hun and po souls.

Thirty spokes converge on a single hub. It is precisely because the center of the hub is hollow that the wheel can be fitted onto the axle and turn, and so fulfill its function as a cart.

"Fu" (spoke) is one of the spokes of a wheel, and "gu" (hub) is the central part of the wheel that receives the spokes and holds the axle within it. "Dang" means "in," "at," or "precisely because." The passage says that the spokes and hub together form the wheel, and that the hollow space at the center of the hub is the key to the cart's movement. Wen Gong explains that because the center of the hub is empty, it can receive the axle, allowing the wheel to turn without cease. Zhuangzi's saying, that "when the pivot finds its center, it can respond to the endless changes," expresses the same idea.

Kneading clay to make vessels works because the inside of the vessel is empty, so that it can hold things and become a useful implement.

"Shan" means kneading earth, and "zhi" means clay; both are steps in pottery making. The hollow interior of a vessel is what allows it to contain objects, and this is why it can be used.

Cutting doors and windows to build a house works because the interior of the house has space, which gives it the function of dwelling.

"Hu" refers to a door, and "you" refers to a window.

Therefore, solid, physical things provide convenience, but it is the empty space within them that makes them function.

是三者皆於外有以成形,中虚而受物。外有者,适时之利。中虚者,真常之用。非无则有无以施其利,非有则无无以致其用,是故形神相资,有无相以。而宰形御气者常无,此所以妙化万有,而利用不穷焉。《易》曰:乾坤毁则无以见易,易不可见,则乾坤或以。而宰形御气者常无,此所以妙化万有,而利用不穷焉。《易》曰:乾坤毁则无以见易,易不可见,则乾坤或几乎息矣。亦此意也。 右十一章河上名无用。此章明有无相资之妙用,以遣其二边取舍之惑。 五色令人目盲,五音令人耳聋,五味令人口爽, 令,并平声,使也。爽,失也,谓失恬淡之真味。 驰骋田猎令人心发狂, 是气也而反动其心,虽志之动气常十九,然此章所言,皆由外而惑我者,故告之制於外以安其内。 难得之货令人行妨。 行,去声。难得之货,皆外物也。妨,谓伤害也。心爱外物,则於善行有所妨也。 是以圣人为腹不为目,故去彼取此。 去,口举切,撒也,此除去之去,非心爱外物,则於善行有所妨也。 是以圣人为腹不为目,故去彼取此。 去,口举切,撒也,此除去之去,非去来之去。腹者有容於内而无欲,目者逐见於外而诱内。为腹犹易艮背之义,不为目犹阴符机在目之说也。
Interpretation

These three things all depend on external conditions to take shape, yet their interior is empty and can contain all things. The external form brings convenience that can be used at any time, while the inner emptiness brings a function that never ceases. Without external form, that convenience has no means of being exercised. Without inner emptiness, the function cannot be realized. Therefore form and spirit depend on each other, and having and non-having complete each other. What governs the form and drives the qi (vital energy) flow is always wu (non-being). For this reason it can bring about wondrous transformations in all things, and its functions are inexhaustible. The Yijing (Classic of Changes) says: "When Qian and Kun are destroyed, the Yi cannot be manifested; when the Yi cannot be seen, Qian and Kun are almost at an end." This also speaks to the same principle.

The above is chapter eleven of the Daodejing, which He Shanggong titled "Wuyong" (The Usefulness of Non-Being). This chapter clarifies the principle that having and non-having depend on each other and together perform their function. It is meant to dispel the confusion of clinging to one side and favoring acceptance over rejection.

"Five colors blind the eye, five tones deafen the ear, and five flavors dull the palate."

"Ling" (to cause), read in the level tone, means "to make." "Shuang" means to lose, referring to the loss of the plain and unadorned authentic flavor.

Galloping horses and hunting for pleasure drive the mind to frenzy.

These are all external things, yet they turn around and disturb the inner heart. Although human intention can often influence the qi flow, what this chapter describes is the way external things confuse the mind. It therefore warns people to restrain outward desires in order to settle the inner heart.

"Goods that are hard to obtain obstruct conduct."

"Xing" (conduct) is read in the departing tone. Rare goods are all external things. "Fang" means to harm or impede. When the heart is attached to external things, it obstructs the practice of goodness.

Therefore the sage attends to satisfying inner needs and does not chase external sensory pleasures. He discards the latter and chooses the former.

"Qu" is read as "kou ju qie," meaning to cast off or remove, not the "qu" of "coming and going." "Fu" (belly) refers to the inner capacity to contain without craving. "Mu" (eye) refers to chasing external scenes and letting outside things stir the heart. "Wei fu" is similar to the Yijing's "gen qi bei" (keeping the back still, so that the mind is not drawn by external things). "Bu wei mu" relates to the Yinfu Jing (Scripture of the Hidden Accord), which says "ji zai mu" (the mechanism lies in the eye). Both are meant to warn that what the eyes see may stir the mechanisms of the heart.

右十二章河上名俭欲。此章明染尘逐境,皆失其正。盖前章言虚中之妙用无穷,故此则戒其不可为外邪所实也。而其要则在於目,是以始终言之,如六根六尘,眼色亦居其首。夫子四勿,必先曰视,皆此意也。然目必视,耳必听,口必味,形必役,心必感,是不可必静。惟动而未尝离静,则虽动而不着於物,乃湛然无欲矣。 宠辱若惊,贵大患若身。 得为宠,失为辱。二者皆若惊,谓不能以自安也。贵显与患难,二者皆若身之不可辞。大患若身。 得为宠,失为辱。二者皆若惊,谓不能以自安也。贵显与患难,二者皆若身之不可辞。 何谓宠辱?宠为下。 宠为辱本,因宠然后有辱,故曰为下。 得之若惊,失之若惊,是谓宠辱若惊。 不以其道,则铃为得失累其心,故若惊也。 何谓贵大患若身?吾所以有大患者,为吾有身,及吾无身,吾有何患。 为,去声。此又言身为贵患之本,无身即忘我也。前不及辱,此不及贵,乃互文以见意,亦以人莫不好贵而恶患,故独以患言。此盖由有我见存焉,苟能无我,则素富贵行乎富贵,素患难行乎患难,夷险不二,苦乐一等,则谁更受贵与患哉? 故贵以身为天下,若可寄天下;爱以身为天下,若可托天下。
Interpretation

The previous chapter explained that once a person is drawn out by external things and follows their circumstances, they lose the proper Way (Dao). The previous chapter described how the inner emptiness and stillness of the heart give rise to limitless subtle function, and this chapter warns against letting external, improper desires fill the heart. The key lies in the eyes, so this chapter centers on them throughout. When the six roots (liugen), the faculties of perception and cognition, which include the eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and mind, encounter the six dusts (liuchen), the objects of perception, which include form, sound, smell, taste, touch, and phenomena, the eyes and the realm of form are often placed first. Confucius's "Four Refrainings" (siwu), which state that one should not look at, listen to, speak, or move in ways contrary to ritual propriety, also begin with "looking," and the underlying meaning is the same.

The eyes see, the ears hear, the mouth tastes flavors, the body labors, and the heart is stirred by things. These activities cannot be stopped entirely. The key is to remain constantly tranquil within activity. In this way, although one engages with things, one is not led about by them, and the heart can remain clear, settled, and free of greed.

"Favor and disgrace cause alarm; regard great calamity as though it were your own body." To receive favor is to be startled; to lose favor is to suffer shame, and in both cases the mind is unsettled. Honor and great calamity both seem to happen to oneself, and they are difficult to refuse.

What does it mean by favor and disgrace? Favor itself plants the root of disgrace: because one is first favored, there later arises the shame of losing that favor.

To be unsettled when receiving favor and equally unsettled when losing it is what is meant by "favor and disgrace cause alarm." If one cannot deal with the world according to the proper Way, gain and loss will burden the heart and make a person anxious and fearful.

What does it mean to regard honor and great calamity as though they were one's own body? I have great calamity because I cling to this body and this self. If one can forget the self, what calamity could there be? Here the text indicates that the body and the sense of self become the source of calamity. "Without body" (wushen) refers to forgetting the attachment to the self. The preceding passage does not mention "disgrace," and this passage does not mention "honor," so the two halves complement each other in expressing a single idea. People generally like honor and dislike hardship, yet this passage speaks only of calamity, because the fundamental problem lies in clinging to the "I." If one is free of the self, then in wealth and honor one walks through them at ease, and in hardship one faces it calmly. Whether the path is smooth or perilous, bitter or sweet, no distinction remains, and one is no longer governed by honor or calamity.

Therefore, one who can cherish the world as dearly as he cherishes his own body may be entrusted with it, and one who can love the world as he loves his own body may be given charge of governing it.

郭象曰:若夫二,苦乐一等,则谁更受贵与患哉? 故贵以身为天下,若可寄天下;爱以身为天下,若可托天下。 郭象曰:若夫轻身以赴利,弃我而徇物,则身且不能安,其如天下何?盖谓必能贵爱其身,然后可任以天下。而贵不及爱之深,寄不若托之久。或云知贵爱其身,则能外天下矣。 右十三章河上名厌耻。此章明去妄情而复正性也。谓遗宠则辱不及,忘身而患不至。天下,大物也,且不以为累,瓦於他物乎?而忘身者,方外之学也。能贵爱其身而不以天下为累者,黄屋非心者也。 视之不见名曰夷, 大象平夷,无色可见。 听之不闻名曰希, 大音希声,寂不可听。 搏之不得名曰微。 搏,伯各切。微妙无形,虚不可执。 此三者,不可致诘,故混而为一。 诘,契吉切。夫道非视听智力之所能及,要必归於一而后可尔。 形,虚不可执。 此三者,不可致诘,故混而为一。 诘,契吉切。夫道非视听智力之所能及,要必归於一而后可尔。 其上不缴,其下不昧, 徼,古晓切,明也。谓在上不加明,而在下不加晦。 绳绳兮不可名,复归於无物。 虽绳然有条,运而不绝,然实无物之可名。 是谓无状之状,无象之象,是谓恍惚。
Interpretation

Guo Xiang said: If a person regards bitterness and pleasure as equal, who would still rejoice in honor or fear hardship and worry?

One who values the world as he values his own self may be entrusted with governing it. One who cherishes the world as he cherishes his own self may be entrusted with its care.

Guo Xiang said: If a person disregards himself in pursuit of profit and abandons himself to cater to external things, and cannot even settle his own body and mind, how could he govern the world? This means that only one who truly values and cherishes himself may be given the weighty charge of the world. To value oneself is still less profound than to cherish oneself, and to entrust the world to him for a time is less than to entrust it to him for good. Some also say that one who knows how to cherish himself can place the world outside himself and not be burdened by it.

The above is Chapter Thirteen. Heshang Gong titled this chapter "Yanchi" (Aversion to Disgrace). It speaks of removing false desires and restoring one's original, true nature. Forget favor, and you will not be humiliated; forget the self, and calamity has no way to arrive. The world is the most weighty of things, yet one does not treat it as a burden, so how much less would one burden oneself with other things? Forgetting the self is the cultivation that transcends the mundane. One who can cherish himself without being encumbered by the world is like one who sits on the throne yet holds no thought of the throne in his heart.

Look at it and it cannot be seen. It is called yi (flat, leaving no trace).

The "great image" (da xiang) is flat and formless, with no color that can be seen.

Listen to it and it cannot be heard. It is called xi (silent, without sound).

The greatest sound is heard as silence, so still that it cannot be perceived.

Try to grasp it and it cannot be caught. It is called wei (subtle and hidden).

The reading of bo is given by the classical fanqie formula "bo-ge-qie." The Dao is subtle and formless, empty and elusive, and cannot be grasped.

These three cannot be pursued to a final answer, so they are blended into one.

The reading of qi is given by the classical fanqie formula "qi-ji-qie." The Dao cannot be reached by sight, hearing, or intellect. It must be returned to a single, undivided whole before it can be realized.

Above, it does not appear bright; below, it does not appear dark.

The reading of jiao is given by the classical fanqie formula "gu-xiao-qie," meaning brightness. This says that the Dao, above, is not made more clear by this, and, below, is not made more obscure by it.

The Dao stretches on without end and cannot be named. In the end it returns to non-being.

It seems to have order and to move without rest, yet in the end there is no concrete thing to which a name can be given.

This is called a shape without shape and an image without image, and it is also called huang hu (a state of seeming to exist and not exist, hard to grasp).

文定曰:状其着也,象其微也。惟非有非无,而有无不可以定名,故曰恍惚。 迎之不见其首,随之不见其后。 惟其非形色而周流无端,所以不可得而随迎。 执古之道,以御今之有,能知古始,是谓道纪。 时有古今,道无终始。圣人教人体道以治身御物,谓即其物之有而原其始之无者,则得其本而统之有宗矣。 右十四章河上名赞玄。此章言道体之冲妙如此,若夫闻不出声,见不超色者有而原其始之无者,则得其本而统之有宗矣。 右十四章河上名赞玄。此章言道体之冲妙如此,若夫闻不出声,见不超色者,苟非迷己着物,则必弃有着无。故反覆发明其不即不离之旨,而使人深造以自得之也。 古之善为士者,微妙玄通,深不可识。 文定曰:粗尽而微,微极而妙,妙极而玄,玄则无所不通,而深不可测。 夫惟不可识,故强为之容:豫兮若冬涉川, 强,上声。豫者图患於未然,逡巡如不得已,慎之至也。 犹兮若畏四邻, 犹者致疑於已事,盖建德若偷,退藏於密,戒之深也。 俨若客, 文公曰:俨若客,语意最精。今本多误作容,殊失本旨。况此七句而三协韵,以客协释,吻若符契。又此凡言若某者,皆有事物之实,所谓客者,亦曰不敢为主而无与於事,故其容俨然耳。
Interpretation

Commentator Wending says: "zhuang" (appearance) describes the manifest side of the Dao's body, and "xiang" (image) compares its subtle, hidden side. The Dao cannot be called existent, nor can it be called nonexistent, so "you" (being) and "wu" (non-being) cannot settle what it is. For this reason it is called "huanghu" (elusive and indistinct).

Facing it, one does not see its front; following it, one does not see its back.

The Dao is not a thing with form or color, and it moves without limit or boundary. For this reason one cannot face it or follow it and so grasp it.

To hold the Dao of antiquity in order to govern the existence of the myriad things of the present, and to know the origin of heaven, earth, and the myriad things, is called "Daoji" (the guiding thread of the Dao), that is, the principle that orders the Dao.

The ages divide into past and present, but the Dao has no end and no beginning. The sage teaches people to cultivate themselves and respond to things by following the Dao. Starting from the existence of concrete things before one's eyes, one traces them back to their original state, formless and traceless. In this way one grasps the root and governs the myriad things through it.

The above is chapter fourteen of the Daodejing. Heshang Gong titled this chapter "Zanxuan" (Praising the Mysterious). The chapter describes how the body of the Dao is empty, profound, and subtle. As for those who hear only audible sounds and see only visible colors, if they cannot trace formed things back to their formless origin, they cannot master the root or govern the myriad things.

Those of old who were skilled at cultivating the Dao were subtle and mysterious, penetrating and far-reaching, so deep that others could hardly comprehend them.

Wending says: when the coarse surface is exhausted, one enters the fine; when the fine reaches its limit, it becomes subtle; when the subtle reaches its limit, it becomes mysterious and remote. Once one arrives at the mysterious and remote, nothing is unpenetrated, and the depth cannot be fathomed.

Because they cannot be fathomed, they are described with effort: cautious, as one who wades across a river in winter.

"Yu" (hesitation) means to take precautions in advance against calamity. They hesitate and proceed carefully, as though they act only when forced to. This is caution carried to its extreme.

They are also like one who fears the neighbors on every side.

"You" (apprehension) refers to repeated deliberation after events have occurred. They establish virtue yet seem to take no action, withdrawing into quiet and hidden places. This is vigilance carried to its deepest degree.

They are dignified, like a guest.

Wen Gong says: "yan ruo ke" (dignified as a guest) is the phrase that best conveys the original meaning. Some present-day editions mistakenly write "rong" (countenance), which loses the original sense. Among the first seven lines, three rhyme, and "ke" (guest) rhymes with "shi" (release), which reads very harmoniously. Wherever this passage uses "like something," a concrete thing serves as the comparison. To be "like a guest" means not daring to act as the master, not presuming to intervene in affairs, and therefore carrying oneself with a dignified and reverent bearing.

涣若冰将殊失本旨。况此七句而三协韵,以客协释,吻若符契。又此凡言若某者,皆有事物之实,所谓客者,亦曰不敢为主而无与於事,故其容俨然耳。 涣若冰将释, 外端庄而内宽裕,涣然不凝於物也。 敦兮其若朴, 质素浑厚,圭角不露。 旷兮其若谷, 宽而有容,虚而能应。 浑兮其若浊。 浑与混同,和光同尘,淈泥扬波,冥乎至道。 孰能浊以静之徐清?孰能安以动之徐生? 以物汩性者,惟静以澄之,则本然之清明者徐自复矣。住於寂灭者,惟安而能迁,则徐清?孰能安以动之徐生? 以物汩性者,惟静以澄之,则本然之清明者徐自复矣。住於寂灭者,惟安而能迁,则不滞於一隅而徐自生矣。所以活泼泼地而动静两忘也。 保此道者,不欲盈。夫惟不盈,故能弊不新成。 御注曰:大白若辱,盛德若不足。牧谦终节,人之所难,故又戒其矜满之心,其旨深矣。惟无自满之心,故能常守其弊而不自有其新成之功。 右十五章河上名显德。此章句句有序,以主於成而若敝则尽矣。如列子居郑圃四十年,无人识者,便是这样子。审若西晋之德。此章句句有序,以主於成而若敝则尽矣。如列子居郑圃四十年,无人识者,便是这样子。审若西晋之风,又乌有此气象哉?
Interpretation

"Huan ruo bing jiang shi" describes an outward bearing that is dignified while the inner heart is open and relaxed, like ice about to melt, unconfined by external things. "Dun xi qi ruo pu" means plain and substantial, without showing sharp edges. "Kuang xi qi ruo gu" means a breadth of heart that can contain all things and can also respond to the outside world with humility. "Hun xi qi ruo zhuo" means blending with the common world without displaying one's own brilliance, as if mixed into mud and water and hidden within the Great Dao.

Who can make what is turbid become still, so that it gradually clears? Who can make what is at rest begin to move, so that it gradually comes alive? When external things disturb the original nature, one need only become quiet and clarify it, and the originally clear nature will gradually return. If one dwells in stillness without motion, then transformation must occur within the stillness, so that one does not cling to a single place but gradually brings forth vitality. Only then can life flow freely, no longer bound to either motion or stillness.

One who holds fast to this Dao does not seek to be complete and self-sufficient. Because one is not self-satisfied, one can remain in a state that appears worn and unrenewed, and does not claim new achievements as one's own. The Imperial Commentary (Yuzhu) says: "Great whiteness seems sullied; abundant De seems deficient." True whiteness appears as though it has been stained, and great virtue appears as though it falls short. To remain humble and self-effacing in this way, always, is difficult for people to achieve, so the text here warns again against arrogance and self-satisfaction. Only by not being self-satisfied can one keep to a state that seems worn, and refrain from treating new accomplishments as one's own merit.

The above is Chapter Fifteen, which the Heshang Gong version calls "Revealing De" (Xiande). The sentences of this chapter proceed in orderly layers, and its central idea is that even when one has achieved something, one should still appear to be lacking. Liezi lived in Putian of the State of Zheng for forty years without being recognized by anyone, which is an instance of this state. If the customs of the Western Jin had truly prevailed, how could such a bearing have existed?

致虚极,守静笃。 虚静兼忘,是谓笃极。 万物并作,吾以观其复。夫物芸芸,各归其根。 芸芸者,动出之貌。虚乃实之根,静乃动之根,谓万物皆作於性,皆复於性。 归根曰静,静曰复命, 夫静,天性也,乃命於我者如是而已,及乎感物则动矣。惟动静两志,则动未尝离静,而复其本然之天矣。文定曰:苟未能自复於性,虽止动息念以求静,非静也。故惟归根,然后为静。命者,性之妙也。《易》谓穷理尽性以至於命是也。 复命曰常, 物未有能常者故惟归根,然后为静。命者,性之妙也。《易》谓穷理尽性以至於命是也。 复命曰常, 物未有能常者,惟至於命,则湛然常存矣。 知常曰明。 悟乎此,则明亦至矣。 不知常,妄作,凶。 即昧乎此,则缘物而动,皆妄也,其凶可知。 知常容, 彻见本元,则差别混融,通塞非碍,何所不容哉。 容乃公, 尚谁私乎? 公乃王, 文定曰:天下将往归之矣。 王乃天, 黄茂材曰:王者与天为徒。 天乃道, 天法道也。文定曰:天犹有形,至於道则极矣。 道乃久,役身不殆。 刘泾曰:所谓自古固存也。 右十六章河上名归根。此章谓悟此道,则能虚能静,与道同体。
Interpretation

Clearing the mind of miscellaneous thoughts to the utmost limit, one holds fast to stillness (jìng) without wavering.

When the mind lets go of both emptiness (xū) and stillness, no longer clinging to either, one has reached complete emptiness and stillness.

The myriad things grow and change together, and I observe from among them how they return to their origin. Though the myriad things flourish in their multiplicity, in the end each returns to its own root.

"Teeming" (yúnyún) describes the myriad things in their abundance and constant activity. Emptiness is the source of fullness, and stillness is the source of activity. All things arise from their original nature and also return to it.

Returning to the root is called stillness, and stillness is the state of life bestowed by returning to one's original nature.

Stillness is one's innate nature, that is, the mandate of Heaven that a person receives from birth. When a person responds to external things, they begin to move. Movement and stillness are distinct, yet activity never departs from the root of stillness. By returning to the origin, one restores one's original nature. Wen Ding said: "If one has not yet returned to one's nature, then even forcibly halting activity and suppressing thoughts in pursuit of stillness is not true stillness. Only by returning to the root can it be called stillness." The "mandate" here is the subtle manifestation of one's nature. The phrase in the Book of Changes (Yìjīng), "exhaust the principles and fully realize one's nature, so as to reach the mandate," expresses this very meaning.

When one returns to the state of life bestowed by one's nature, one attains constancy.

Nothing among the myriad things can remain unchanged forever. Only by returning to the root of life bestowed by one's nature can one become clear, settled, and enduring.

To know constancy is called clarity (míng).

Having grasped this principle, one's understanding reaches full clarity.

Not knowing constancy leads to reckless movement and brings calamity.

If one does not understand this principle, one is drawn along by external things and acts accordingly. All such conduct arises from reckless movement, and the resulting misfortune can be readily imagined.

To know constancy is to have a spacious and tolerant heart.

When one thoroughly perceives the origin, one can penetrate all differences and is not bound by either success or obstruction. Therefore nothing is beyond one's embrace.

One who can embrace all things is impartial.

What partiality could remain?

One who is impartial can become a king.

Wen Ding said: "The people of the world will turn to him."

To become a king is to be in accord with Heaven.

Huang Maocai said: "The king is a companion of Heaven."

To be in accord with Heaven is to be in accord with the Dao.

Yet Heaven itself follows the Dao. Wen Ding said: "Heaven still has form; only the Dao is the ultimate root."

To be in accord with the Dao is to endure long, and to use oneself without coming to peril.

Liu Jing said: "This is what is meant by 'existing since ancient times without cease.'"

The above is Chapter 16 of the Daode Zhenjing (Scripture of the Way and Its De), which Heshang Gong titled "Returning to the Root" (Guī Gēn). This chapter teaches that by grasping this principle, one can attain emptiness and stillness and become one with the Dao.

太上,下知有之; 太朴泾曰:所谓自古固存也。 右十六章河上名归根。此章谓悟此道,则能虚能静,与道同体。 太上,下知有之; 太朴上古之时,上如标枝,民如野鹿是也。 其次,亲之誉之; 此以仁义结人者也。 其次,畏之侮之。 此以智力服人者也。 故信不足,有不信。 吾诚自信,则以道御天下,足矣。惟自信之诚不足,而后申之以劝赏,重之以刑政,而民始有不信之心矣。 犹兮其贵言。功成事遂,百姓皆曰我自然。 希言自然而民服无为之化,则太古之治可复,故曰声色之於化民,末也。 右十七章河上名淳风。此章赞太古无为之化,而警风俗之日下也。 大道废,有仁义;智慧出,有大伪;六亲不和,有孝慈;国家昏乱,有忠臣。 大道之隆,七义之实,隐然於其中而民不知,所谓纯朴不残,孰为牺樽是也。然牺樽亦岂。 大道之隆,七义之实,隐然於其中而民不知,所谓纯朴不残,孰为牺樽是也。然牺樽亦岂离纯朴而别为一物哉,特其智慧已出而诈伪亦由是而滋矣。文定曰:尧非不孝而独称舜,无瞽史也;伊周非不忠而独称龙逢、比干,无桀纣也。 右十八章河上名俗薄。此章盖深悯世道之不古也。 绝圣弃智,民利百倍;
Interpretation

The highest form of governance is when the people know only that there is a ruler, and do not feel that he interferes in their lives at every moment. Tai Pu Jing says this is the natural state that has held since ancient times.

In remote antiquity, Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue) were rich and sincere. The ruler was like the high branches at the top of a tree, while the people were like deer in the mountain wilds, each living at ease. This is the scene described by "the highest governance: the people know only that he exists."

The next level of governance is when the people draw close to the ruler and praise him. This uses benevolence and righteousness to gather the hearts of the people.

The level after that is when the people fear the ruler and even treat him with contempt and ridicule. This uses cleverness and force to make people obey.

Therefore, when the ruler's own sincerity is insufficient, the people will not trust him. If he can truly have confidence in the Dao, governing the realm by the Dao is enough. Only when sincerity is lacking does one resort to rewards to entice the people and to penal decrees to restrain them, and the people then develop a mind of distrust.

The ruler is cautious and seldom issues commands. When affairs are accomplished, the people say, "We did it ourselves; this is simply how it was done." By using few words of instruction and letting the people naturally submit to the teaching of wuwei (non-action), the governance of remote antiquity may be restored. Therefore, using sounds, colors, and words to instruct the people is the last resort.

The Heshang Gong Commentary titles chapter seventeen "Pure Wind" (Chunfeng). This chapter praises the style of non-action governance in remote antiquity and also reminds people that the customs of the world have gradually declined.

When the great Dao has fallen into decay, benevolence and righteousness are especially emphasized. When wisdom appears, great pretense arises. When relatives are not in harmony, filial piety and kindness are stressed. When the state is in chaos, loyal ministers become visible.

When the great Dao flourishes, the substance of benevolence and righteousness is naturally contained within it, yet the people do not notice it. It is like raw wood that has not been carved: there is no need to deliberately shape it into a sacrificial wine vessel (xizun, a vessel carved in the form of an ox) to display its worth. The xizun does not separate from the raw wood to become something else. Only when wisdom is revealed does falsehood grow along with it. Wending says: Yao was not unfilial, but because of Gusou and others, Shun's filial piety stood out. Yi Yin and the Duke of Zhou were not disloyal, but because of Jie and Zhou, the loyalty of Guan Longfeng and Bi Gan stood out.

The Heshang Gong Commentary titles chapter eighteen "Thinning Customs" (Subo). This chapter laments deeply that the world no longer has the simplicity of ancient times.

Cut off self-proclaimed sagacity and abandon cleverness and scheming, and the people will receive a hundredfold benefit.

惟不居其圣,则绝无自圣之心。去小智则大智明,故使民各安其性命之情,而其利博矣。 绝仁弃义,民复孝慈; 夫仁义之实,本为孝慈。惟假其名而忘其实,则其本迷矣。故欲弃绝其进,而复其良知良能之初,则七义之实可不言而尽矣。 绝巧弃利,盗贼无有。 迷矣。故欲弃绝其进,而复其良知良能之初,则七义之实可不言而尽矣。 绝巧弃利,盗贼无有。 文定曰:巧所以便事也,利所以济物也,二者非以为盗,而盗贼不得则无以行。 此三者,以为文不足,故令有所属。 令,平声。属,之欲切。圣智、仁义、巧利,此三者皆道中之事,由后世徒徇其名,用之以为文饰,而内诚不足,乃专以智力持世,岂足为善治哉。至於末流,必有不胜其害者矣。故令反其本而有所统属,则天下之民各复其性矣。所谓有事不足以取天下,及我无为而民自化云云,是矣。 见素抱朴,少私寡欲。 见,贤遍切。此乃属之之地,弃绝之机要也。 右十九章河上名还淳。此章尊素朴之风,去私欲之累,则其利博矣。《阴符经》云:绝利一源,用师此乃属之之地,弃绝之机要也。
Interpretation

Once one no longer occupies the rank and name of a sage, no thought of regarding oneself as a sage will arise. Discard cleverness and petty wisdom, and great wisdom will become manifest. In this way the common people will each keep to the natural condition of their own nature and life, and the benefits they receive will be wide-reaching.

Abandon the names of benevolence (ren) and righteousness (yi), and the people will return to the original heart of filial devotion to their parents and compassion toward their children.

The root of benevolence and righteousness is in fact filial piety and compassion (xiao ci). If one merely borrows the names of benevolence and righteousness while forgetting their actual content, one will inevitably lose the way. Therefore, if one can abandon practices that remain at the level of surface appearance and restore the innate good knowing and good ability that people originally possess, the real substance of benevolence and righteousness will arise naturally, with no need to deliberately raise them up.

Abandon skill and private profit, and bandits will have no way to arise.

Wen Ding says: Skill was originally meant to make affairs more convenient, and profit was originally meant to nourish the myriad things. Neither was originally meant for the work of bandits. Yet if bandits could not obtain these conveniences and profits, they would have no means of carrying out theft.

The three notions of sage wisdom (sheng zhi), benevolence and righteousness (ren yi), and skillful profit (qiao li) cannot be governed merely as surface ornaments, so they must be given a proper place of belonging and be unified. Here the character ling is read in the level tone, and the character shu is read by the fanqie "zhi yu qie."

Sage wisdom, benevolence and righteousness, and skillful profit were all originally contained within the Dao. Later people chase only these names and treat them as decoration, while their hearts lack sincerity, so they rely only on schemes and force to govern the world. How could this be considered good governance? As such practices develop, calamities that cannot be borne will certainly follow. Therefore one should return to the root and bring these things under unifying governance, and the people of the world will each recover their nature. What is meant by "deliberate action is not enough to gain the world," and "I do nothing and the people transform themselves," speaks to this very principle.

Reveal simplicity, hold to genuineness, lessen selfishness, and reduce desire.

The character jian is read as "xian bian qie." This is precisely where sage wisdom, benevolence and righteousness, and skillful profit return to their root, and it is the crux of abandoning surface names.

The above is chapter nineteen of the Daode Zhenjing (Dao De Zhen Jing, the True Scripture of the Way and Its Power), which Heshang Gong titled "Returning to Simplicity" (Huan Chun). This chapter esteems an atmosphere of plainness and advocates removing the fetters that selfish desire creates, holding that only in this way can the common people broadly benefit. The Yinfu Jing (Yin Fu Jing, the Scripture of the Hidden Accord) says: "Cut off profit at its single source," meaning to sever the root of the pursuit of gain.

右十九章河上名还淳。此章尊素朴之风,去私欲之累,则其利博矣。《阴符经》云:绝利一源,用师十倍。是也。或云绝者非去绝之绝,乃极其至而人不可及之谓也。必有绝圣然后能弃私智,下意同。 绝学无忧。 得道忘诠,释然无累。 唯之与阿,相去几何? 唯,维水切,声顺而恭应也。阿,乌何切,声高而慢应也。 善之与恶,相去何若?人之所畏,不可不畏。 若未至乎绝学之地,当知此心寂然无为,於善恶未发之时,乃浑然之本体,至正至善者也。及乎趋善向恶,皆为动也,然有是身不能不感,故当致察於感物而动之时。谓恭与善,则原於理义之正;而慢与恶,则汩於形气之私。其於二者之间,相去不容以发,而天时。谓恭与善,则原於理义之正;而慢与恶,则汩於形气之私。其於二者之间,相去不容以发,而天理人欲分焉。惟欲易流,人莫不然,是不可不畏也。苟能於此察之精而择之审,守之固而养之熟,乃至於动而无动,静而无静,则虽感应无穷,而湛然虚明者自若,乃纯乎天理,了无对待,则慢与恶何有哉。 荒兮其未央哉。 荒大而莫知其畔岸,则是未尝倚乎恭慢之一偏也。 众人熙熙,如享太牢,如登春台。我独怕兮其未兆,若婴儿之未孩。
Interpretation

The passage speaks of esteeming simplicity and reducing selfish desire. The phrase "jue li" (cutting off profit) means severing the entanglements of personal gain. Some readers instead take it to mean carrying a principle to its extreme so that others cannot reach it. Only when one sets aside the self-regarding mind of clever calculation can one abandon partial scheming and deal with the world with a humble heart.

"Jue xue wu you" (abandoning learning, there is no worry) means that once one has grasped the Dao, one no longer clings to words and names (the terms and formulations used to explain principles), and so the mind becomes at ease and free of concern.

"Wei" and "e" are both responses. "Wei" is deferential in tone, while "e" is haughty. How much do they differ? How much separates good from evil? What people fear is something one cannot help but fear seriously.

If one has not yet reached the state of "jue xue," one should understand that when the mind has not yet stirred with thoughts of good or evil, it is still and non-acting (Wuwei), preserving an undivided and complete original nature. Once it inclines toward good or evil, the mind begins to move. Yet because a person has a body, it is inevitable that external things will affect it, so one must carefully observe the moment when the mind is moved by things it encounters. Reverence and goodness have their root in conforming to righteousness, whereas haughtiness and evil are disturbed by the temperament of the body and by selfish desire. The difference between the two is extremely fine; Tianli (Heavenly Principle) and renyu (human desire) separate at this single thought. The human mind easily drifts along with desire, which is why one cannot but be vigilant. If one discerns finely, chooses prudently, holds firmly to this, and nourishes it continuously, until in action the mind is not carried away by activity and in stillness it does not cling to quietude, then even when responding to the endless changes of external things, the mind remains clear, empty, and at peace as before. In this way one fully accords with Tianli, no longer falls into opposition and distinction, and haughtiness and evil naturally have no way to arise.

"Huang xi qi wei yang zai" (vast indeed, and without end) describes a state of mind that is boundless and has no fixed limits, and therefore does not cling to one extreme of deference or haughtiness.

The multitude is elated, as though attending a lavish banquet or ascending a terrace on a spring day. I alone am calm and placid, as though my thoughts have not yet appeared, like an infant who does not yet know how to laugh.

怕,白各切,静也。心目所经,外境方盛享太牢,如登春台。我独怕兮其未兆,若婴儿之未孩。 怕,白各切,静也。心目所经,外境方盛,随时逐物而不知其非。惟上圣彻见其妄,遇之漠然不动,如婴儿之未至提孩,心无所着故也。 乘乘兮,若无所归。 曹曰:乘万物而游,无所系累也。 众人皆有余,我独若遗。 遗,忘也,盖有若无也。 我愚人之心也哉,纯纯兮。 御注曰:天机不张,而默与道契,兹谓大智。 俗人昭昭,我独若昏;俗人察察,我独闷闷。 昭昭,光耀目衒也。若昏,谓不分别也。察察,明而不容貌。闷,叶音,莫奔切,宽裕貌。 澹兮其若海,飂兮似无所止。 飂,力幽切,如长风飘扬之状。夫渊静容物,乃混然之全体;变动不居,乃大用之流行。 众人皆莫奔切,宽裕貌。 澹兮其若海,飂兮似无所止。 飂,力幽切,如长风飘扬之状。夫渊静容物,乃混然之全体;变动不居,乃大用之流行。 众人皆有以,我独顽且鄙。 以,用也,顽然无知也。鄙,野也。人皆知有用之用,而莫知无用之用也。 我独异於人,而贵食於母。 文定曰:道者,万物之母。众人徇物忘道,而圣人脱遗万物以道为宗,如婴儿求食於母也。
Interpretation

Although in my heart I can see the outside world setting out abundant offerings, bustling and flourishing, as if I had climbed a spring terrace to gaze at the scenery, I remain quiet and serene, as though nothing has yet shown any sign, like an infant who has not yet grown old enough to laugh and play.

People often follow the times and chase after external things, without knowing that anything is amiss in doing so. Only the sage (shèngrén) sees through all of this as illusory. When encountering external things, the sage remains calm and unmoved, like an infant who cannot yet laugh and play, with no attachment in the heart.

I drift along as the myriad things roam freely, as if I have no fixed place to return to, and I am not burdened by entanglements.

The multitude all think they possess a great deal, while I seem to have nothing, as if I had forgotten everything.

My heart is truly like that of a fool, simple and unadorned. My innate spiritual clarity does not show itself outwardly, yet in silent stillness it accords with the Dao (Dào, the Way). This is true great wisdom.

Other people appear brilliant and dazzling, while I seem dim and dark. Others are sharp and scrutinizing, while I am generous and tranquil. The term "chá chá" describes the appearance of being so keen and exacting as to tolerate no ambiguity, while "mèn mèn" describes the appearance of being spacious, easy, and calm.

My state of mind is deep and tranquil, like the sea, yet it is also like a long wind drifting on, not knowing where it will come to rest. Deep stillness can embrace the myriad things; this is the Dao in its undivided oneness. Change and flow without fixed rest are the vast functioning of the Dao.

The multitude all think they are useful, while I seem dull and crude. "Useful" refers to visible function. People recognize only tangible use, and do not realize that what is formless and seemingly useless also has its own function.

I am different from the crowd. What I treasure is nourishment drawn from the root Dao. The Dao is the mother of the myriad things. The crowd chase external things and forget the Dao, while the sage sets aside attachment to the myriad things and takes the Dao as the root, just as an infant relies on its mother to be nurtured.

右二十章河上名异俗。此章首示绝以立标;复举谕以明理,次格凡圣以对辩#2,终论独行以返宗也。或曰唯阿同出於声,善恶同出於为。达人大观,本实名异俗。此章首示绝以立标;复举谕以明理,次格凡圣以对辩#2,终论独行以返宗也。或曰唯阿同出於声,善恶同出於为。达人大观,本实非异,正如臧谷亡羊之意也。此故太上忘情,是非俱泯者之所为。然学者直须於善恶不可名处着眼始得,若直以为善与恶同耳,则是任天下入於恶而不之顾,岂理也哉。 道德真经集解卷之一竟 #1不如揣之:原本作『不知揣之』,据十万本改。 #2对辩:原本作『对卞』,据十万本改。 3-道德真经集解卷之二 道德真经集解卷之二 后学董思靖集解 孔德之容,惟道是从。 孔,甚也,谓盛德也。德乃道之所以形见者,自是推之,则凡众有之容,皆道之见於物,谓从道中出也。 道之为物,,谓盛德也。德乃道之所以形见者,自是推之,则凡众有之容,皆道之见於物,谓从道中出也。 道之为物,惟恍惟惚。 有无不可定指之也。 惚兮恍兮,其中有象;恍兮惚兮,其中有物。窈兮冥兮,其中有精;其精甚真,其中有信。
Interpretation

“Kong De” refers to a profound and abundant De (Virtue/Power). De is the aspect in which Dao (the Way) manifests. Extending this, the forms taken by all things are all manifestations of Dao within things, and all come from Dao.

Dao, as a kind of existence, is elusive and difficult to grasp; it cannot be clearly defined as either “being” or “non-being.” Though it is elusive and indeterminate, within it there are images; though it seems indistinct, within it there are actual things. It is deep and obscure, and within it is contained subtle Qi (vital energy); this subtle Qi is real and not illusory, and within it there is its own trustworthy ground.

此无状之状,无象之象也。冥冥之中独见晓焉,无声之中独闻和焉。於至无之中,而真一之精湛然独存,感之即应,岂非信乎? 自古及今,其名不去,以阅众甫。吾何以知众甫之然哉?以此。 文定曰:古今虽异而道则不去,故以不去名之,惟未尝去,故能,其名不去,以阅众甫。吾何以知众甫之然哉?以此。 文定曰:古今虽异而道则不去,故以不去名之,惟未尝去,故能以阅众甫之变也。甫,美也。虽众甫之变日逝而不停,然甚真之精,常存而不亡。圣人知万物之所以然者,亦以能体此道故也。 右二十一章河上名虚心。此章明至道之真,得万物之常也。 曲则全, 上圣即心而即道,或曲或直,惟义所在,莫非全乎道也。苟处时之变,则曲身以全道。惟能曲则不忤於物,内以全身,外以全物。 枉则直, 枉乃所以为直,尺蠖之屈,以求伸也。 洼则盈, 洼,乌瓜切,埳也。如地之洼下,则水满之,盖谦受益也。 弊则新, 暗然而日章也。 少则得, 道一而已,乌瓜切,埳也。如地之洼下,则水满之,盖谦受益也。 弊则新, 暗然而日章也。 少则得, 道一而已,得一则无不得矣。故於至约之中,而是体之全,是用之妙,罔不具焉。 多则惑。
Interpretation

It has a shape that cannot be described and an image that cannot be identified by any trace. In the dark and profound depths, only the Dao (the Way) appears alone; in silence, only the Dao responds alone. In the most empty place, the true-one essence, meaning the pure and subtle substance of the Dao, exists alone in clarity, and once it senses something, it responds at once. Is this not true?

From antiquity to the present, the name of the Dao has never disappeared, so it can run through and observe the beginnings of all things. How do I know the circumstances at the beginning of the myriad things? It is through this very Dao.

Commentator Wen Ding says: Though past and present differ, the Dao has never departed, so it is called "bu qu" (not departing). Precisely because the Dao has never departed, it can pass through and observe the transformations of all things. "Fu" means fine and good. Though the myriad things keep changing and passing away without rest, the real and subtle Dao remains constant and does not perish. The sage knows why things are as they are, and this too is because he is able to realize this Dao.

The above is Chapter Twenty-One of the Daodejing (Classic of the Way and Its Power), which the Heshang Gong commentary calls "Xuxin" (Emptying the Heart). This chapter clarifies that the supreme Dao is real and not empty, and that one can thereby perceive the constant root of the myriad things.

Yielding leads instead to wholeness.

The highest sage follows his original heart and also follows the Dao. Sometimes he yields, sometimes he goes straight, and as long as it accords with righteousness, both are a complete embodiment of the Dao. Within the shifts of circumstance, one should yield in order to preserve the Dao. One who can yield will not clash with external things. Inwardly one preserves oneself, and outwardly one preserves things.

Bending leads instead to straightening.

Bending is precisely for the sake of extending, like the inchworm, which first bends its body and then stretches forward.

Hollowness leads instead to fullness.

"Wa" (hollow) refers to a low-lying place. When the land is low, water gathers in it. This is the principle that humility receives benefit.

Worn leads instead to renewal.

It appears dim and unremarkable, yet it grows clearer day by day.

Taking little leads instead to gaining.

The Dao is one. Once one obtains this root, nothing is left unobtained. Therefore, within extreme simplicity, the completeness of the Dao's body and the subtlety of its function are already present.

Having much leads instead to confusion.

凡事多端则惑。 是以圣人抱一为天下式。 此随时趋变以道,而在乎以谦约为主。故圣人惟抱一以为天下古今之准的,所谓抱一则全体是道也。 不自见,故明;不自是,故彰;不自伐,故有功;不自矜,故长。夫惟不争,故天下莫能与之争。 见,形甸切,显也,此教学者养德之方也。盖抱一则无我,若更自见、自是、自伐、自矜,则是我见未忘,又乌可以言一哉?惟至於无我之地,则自然光明盛大,愈久愈新,心法双融人我俱泯,何争之有? 古之所谓曲则全者,岂虚言哉。诚全而归之。 盖老子迷而不作,所谓无我之地,则自然光明盛大,愈久愈新,心法双融人我俱泯,何争之有? 古之所谓曲则全者,岂虚言哉。诚全而归之。 盖老子迷而不作,所谓曲则全等语,皆古文也。此申其言之不妄者,劝之深也。使学者果能尽其曲枉之道,则道之大全,实皆归诸己矣。道乃人之固有,故云归,言复其初也。夫如是,则其为直与盈者大矣。 右二十二章河上名益谦。此章示柔顺之谦,全成和之德也。 希言自然。 经云:听之不闻名曰希。圣人言出於希,皆由其自然,故久而不穷。温公曰:有道者不言而信,故曰自然。 故飘风不终朝,骤雨不终日。
Interpretation

Too many affairs at once will confuse people.

Therefore the sage holds fast to "baoyi" (embracing the One), that is, keeping to pure unity, and makes it the standard that all people under heaven follow.

The sage follows the changing of circumstances in practicing the Dao (the Way), but takes humility and simplicity as the foundation. Therefore the sage holds only to "baoyi" and treats it as the measure for all ages. What "baoyi" means is bringing the body and mind as a whole into accord with the Dao.

Not displaying oneself, one becomes clear-sighted. Not regarding oneself as right, one's reputation shines. Not boasting of one's merit, one can accomplish great work. Not being arrogant, one can endure. It is precisely because one does not contend with others that no one under heaven can contend with him.

"Xian" is read here as "xian," meaning to show or reveal. This teaches the method of cultivating De (Virtue). Holding to "baoyi" brings freedom from the self. If one still deliberately displays oneself, regards oneself as right, boasts of merit, and is proud, this shows that private views of the self have not been removed, and then how could it be called pure unity? When one reaches the state of no-self, the heart naturally becomes bright and open, and De can be renewed over time. When the heart merges with the Dao and the distinction between self and others disappears, there is no contention at all.

The ancient saying that "yielding preserves wholeness" is not empty talk. Indeed, one who can preserve oneself and return to the root will find that the Dao returns to dwell within oneself.

Sayings such as "yielding preserves wholeness" are words from antiquity. This passage further affirms that they are not false, and it sincerely encourages those who study: if one can truly yield and bend humbly, the complete virtue of the Dao will return to oneself. The Dao is inherent in people from the start, so the text says "return," meaning to restore one's original state. When this is achieved, what is called uprightness and fullness can truly be realized.

The above is chapter 22 of the Daodejing (Classic of the Dao and De). Heshang Gong titled this chapter "yiqian" (Increasing Humility). This chapter shows that through a gentle, yielding, and humble attitude, one can accomplish a complete and harmonious De.

Speaking little accords with nature.

The scripture says, "What cannot be heard is called xi." The sage's words arise from xi, follow nature, and therefore can last without exhaustion. Sima Guang said that a person of the Dao does not rely on many words, and others are convinced nonetheless, so this is called nature.

A strong wind cannot blow through a whole morning, and a downpour cannot last through a whole day.

飘风者,狂疾之风。骤雨者,急暴之雨。此阴阳击搏,忽然之变也#1。然终不能胜清宁之自然,故不。 故飘风不终朝,骤雨不终日。 飘风者,狂疾之风。骤雨者,急暴之雨。此阴阳击搏,忽然之变也#1。然终不能胜清宁之自然,故不能久。自旦至中为终朝,自旦至暮为终日。 孰为此者?天地。天地尚不能久,而况於人乎? 苟反常,则非自然。虽出於天地,亦不能久,况於人乎?然天地亦不能无反常之时,则人亦岂能免於失哉。 故从事於道者, 惟从事於自然之道者,其心有常,乃能体道之所为,故乐与而善诱,无所不同之也。 道者同於道, 此安行者之事。然上圣生知,犹资学以成其道。所以德不从事於自然之道者,其心有常,乃能体道之所为,故乐与而善诱,无所不同之也。 道者同於道, 此安行者之事。然上圣生知,犹资学以成其道。所以德不孤必有邻,是故同於道矣。 德者同於德, 此利行者之事。学知而必求以有得於己。 失者同於失。 此勉行者之事。谓人之气禀,苟或失於偏,然其性则未尝少异,故亦与之同而化之。 同於道者,道亦得之;同於德者,德亦得之;同於失者,失亦得之。
Interpretation

A gale is a violent, swift wind, and a downpour is a hurried, fierce rain. These are sudden changes produced by the clash of Yin-Yang, but in the end they cannot overcome the tranquil, settled norm of nature, and so they do not last. What lasts from dawn to noon is called a morning (yi zhao), and what lasts from dawn to dusk is called a day.

Who causes such changes? Heaven and Earth. If Heaven and Earth cannot sustain abnormal change, how much less can humans? To go against the constant way is to fall out of accord with nature. Even Heaven and Earth have their aberrant moments, but these likewise do not endure. How, then, could a person entirely avoid error?

Therefore, one who acts in accordance with the Dao (the Way) will be in harmony with the Dao. Dong Sijing explains that only those who follow the natural Way have a constant standard in their hearts and can act in the manner of the Dao. Such people delight in being with others and are skilled at guiding them, and they do not reject those who differ from themselves.

One who is in harmony with the Dao is also nourished by the Dao. Dong Sijing points out that even sages born with an understanding of the principles still rely on learning to accomplish their Dao. Those of virtue are never isolated; in time they will find like-minded companions, and this is how they come to be in harmony with the Dao.

One who is in harmony with De (Virtue) is brought to completion by De. Dong Sijing says this refers to those who gain through practice: after they study, they strive to make what they have learned truly their own attainment.

One who is in harmony with error also receives the consequences of error. Dong Sijing interprets this as referring to those who exert themselves in cultivation. Human endowments may be somewhat deficient, but original nature is not thereby entirely different, so one should associate with such people and guide them to change gradually.

Those who are in harmony with the Dao are accomplished by the Dao; those who are in harmony with De are accomplished by De; and those who are in harmony with error receive the corresponding results of error.

虽因其所禀之殊,而所入不得不异。然苟能同而化之,及其得,则成功之一也。 信不足,有不信。、 惟自信之诚不至,故因其失而疑之,是以有不信之患虽因其所禀之殊,而所入不得不异。然苟能同而化之,及其得,则成功之一也。 信不足,有不信。、 惟自信之诚不至,故因其失而疑之,是以有不信之患。苟不信矣,虽与之同,亦不能化之也。必深造自得者,然后安然於不疑之地。 右二十三章河上名虚无。此章明自然之道可以常久,然至易而守难,故天地之大苟失其常,亦不能久,况於人乎。其於人也,性固同而气察则异,或梏於形气之私者,则失其自然之性,然而性未尝失也。惟在乎先觉者,善方便以觉之,同其事以摄之,则可以复其本然之自然矣。《庄子》云:彼且为无崖,亦与之为则失其自然之性,然而性未尝失也。惟在乎先觉者,善方便以觉之,同其事以摄之,则可以复其本然之自然矣。《庄子》云:彼且为无崖,亦与之为无崖。达之入於无疵是也。此圣人大同之德,无私之教,所以顺其自然,曲成而不遗也。惟终於自暴自弃者,不与焉。 跂者不立,跨者不行, 跨,去智切,与企同。跨者,跨其两端也。温公曰:违性之常而心有所属,故不能两存。 自见者不明,
Interpretation

Although each person's innate endowment differs, so the paths into the Dao (Dao, the Way) inevitably vary, if people can communicate with one another and integrate their understandings, and ultimately arrive at realization, what they accomplish is in fact the same thing.

"If trust is insufficient, there will be those who do not believe."

It is only because the sincerity of one's self-confidence is not firm enough that one doubts when encountering setbacks, and so the anxiety of disbelief arises. Once one no longer believes, even when walking alongside others, one cannot be guided or transformed. One must cultivate deeply and attain realization before one can rest peacefully in a state free from doubt.

The above is Chapter Twenty-Three, which He Shanggong titled "Emptiness and Nothingness" (Xuwu). This chapter explains that the Way of naturalness can endure for a long time, yet although it appears easy, truly preserving it is very difficult. Therefore, even though Heaven and Earth are vast, once they lose their constant regularity they cannot endure for long, and how much less so humans.

Human nature is originally the same, but temperament and endowment differ. Some people are bound by the desires that arise from their physical form and temperament, and so they lose their natural nature. Yet the nature itself has never truly been lost. The key lies in the enlightened ones among us, who must use skillful methods to awaken others, work alongside them, and guide them in accordance with their circumstances, so that they recover their original natural state. The Zhuangzi says: "If he pursues the boundless, I will accompany him toward the boundless." To lead someone into a state without deficiency is what this means. It embodies the sage's broad and selfless virtue and transforming influence: accord with people's natural nature, guide them by following the momentum of their situation, and leave no one out. Only those who persistently abandon themselves are excluded.

"Standing on tiptoe, one cannot stand firm; striding with wide steps, one cannot walk far."

The character for "stride" here (kua), read as qu zhi qie, is synonymous with qi, meaning to stand on tiptoe. A "kua-er" refers to a person who spreads their legs very wide. Sima Guang explains: to go against the original normal state of one's nature, with the heart inclined to one side, is to be unable to attend to both sides.

"Those who regard themselves as seeing clearly are, instead, unable to see clearly."

自显者,终不明。 自是者不彰, 敝己是者,夫谁信之哉。 自伐者无功, 自夸其劳者,人不以为功。 自矜者不长。 眩其能则不可以久。 其於道也,曰余食赘行。物或恶之, 赘,专税切,附余之肉也。行,下孟切。恶,去声。温公曰:是皆外竞而内亡者也。如弃余之食,适使人恶;附养之形,适使人丑。 故有道者不处税切,附余之肉也。行,下孟切。恶,去声。温公曰:是皆外竞而内亡者也。如弃余之食,适使人恶;附养之形,适使人丑。 故有道者不处也。 处,上声,谓不处心於此,视若脱然也。 右二十四章河上名苦恩。此章谓主一者足於内,而不矜於外也。 有物混成,先天地生。 先,悉荐切。夫道混然成体,自古固存,而两仪由之以生。物即道之为物之物也。 寂兮寥兮,独立而不改,周行而不殆,可以为天下母。
Interpretation

Those who display themselves do not come to clear understanding; those who insist on their own rightness do not become distinguished; those who regard themselves as exalted are not trusted by others.

Those who boast of themselves have no merit; those who recount their own toil will not be credited by others as having achieved anything. Those who are proud and self-important cannot endure for long; those who flaunt their abilities will not sustain them.

To the Dao, these behaviors are like leftover food and superfluous flesh, which everyone finds repugnant. "Superfluous flesh" refers to excess flesh attached to the body, and "xing (form)" here means the body or physical form. Lord Wen (Wen Gong) said: these are all expressions of striving outward while suffering inner loss. Just as offering someone leftover food only provokes disgust, and a body burdened with superfluous flesh only looks unsightly.

Therefore, one who has the Dao does not dwell on these things and regards them with detachment.

The above is chapter twenty-four. Master He Shanggong (He Shanggong) titled this chapter "Bitter Grace" (Ku'en). This chapter says that one who holds to unity (shou zhuan) is full within and does not boast outwardly.

There is a kind of undifferentiated wholeness that came into being before heaven and earth. Here, "wu (thing)" refers to the existence that the Dao presents. The Dao forms itself into a seamless whole that has existed since antiquity, and from it heaven, earth, yin, and yang arise.

It is silent and soundless, vast and formless. It stands alone without changing, circulates without ever becoming endangered, and can serve as the root of all things under heaven.

寂然无声也,寥邈无形也。以其体则卓然无所对待而不变不迁,以其用则周匝运行而不危不殆,此盖即本然之全体,而有流行生育之妙以其体则卓然无所对待而不变不迁,以其用则周匝运行而不危不殆,此盖即本然之全体,而有流行生育之妙用焉。母者,生生之本也,不可指为一物,故赞之以寂兮寥兮;又非溺於空寂,故兼体用而言独立周行,而生物也不测矣。 吾不知其名,字之曰道,强为之名曰大。 强,上声,此实无得而名焉。 大曰逝, 逝,往也,谓往被於万物也。 逝曰远, 无往不周。 远曰反。 极其远则其大无外,反而求则其小无内,盖遍乎万物,而未尝离本故也。 故道大,天大,地大,王远, 无往不周。 远曰反。 极其远则其大无外,反而求则其小无内,盖遍乎万物,而未尝离本故也。 故道大,天大,地大,王亦大。域中有四大,而王居其一焉。
Interpretation

Dao is silent and formless, vast and profound. In terms of its essence, it stands alone with nothing that could be its counterpart, and so it does not change or shift. In terms of its function, it pervades and moves through all things without any peril or exhaustion. This is the Dao-body in its original completeness, containing the marvelous function of constant flow and transformation that brings all things into being.

The "Mother" here is the root from which all things endlessly arise. It cannot be pointed to as any particular thing, so it is described with the words ji (silent, still) and liao (empty, vast). Yet it does not fall into empty stillness and non-action, which is why it must also be described in terms of both essence and function: it stands alone, yet it pervades and moves, and the process by which it generates the myriad things is unfathomable.

I do not know how to name it, so I provisionally give it the style-name "Dao," and forcibly call it "Great" (da). The character qiang (forcibly, reluctantly) is read in the rising tone and means "to force"; the Dao, in truth, cannot be accurately named at all.

Greatness leads to flow. Shi (to proceed, to move onward) means to go forth and operate, referring to the Dao's movement as it reaches all things. To flow and spread is called "far," because there is nowhere it does not reach. Having reached the utmost distance, it returns to its origin: viewed from the farthest extent, the Dao is so vast that nothing lies outside it, and turned inward, it is so subtle that nothing lies within it. It pervades all things, yet never departs from its root.

Therefore, the Dao is great, Heaven is great, Earth is great, and the King is great. Among Heaven and Earth there are four great things, and the King is one of them.

夫道超乎天地有形之先,故章首云先天地也,而亦未尝不在乎天地有形之中,故复云域中有四大也。若由道言之,则天地与王皆不足言其大矣,然道亦岂外是三者而别为一物哉?故即域中而言,则世人惟知是三者之大,而不信道大,是故云耳。初非谓道亦域中之一物也,学者不可以辞害意,申言而王居其一焉者,谓人者天地之心,而会乎道,所以潜天而天,港地而地,凡於万物之中灵秀者,莫出乎人,而王统之故也。 人法地,地法天,天法道,道法自然。 法者,相因之义也。故语其序,则人处於地凡於万物之中灵秀者,莫出乎人,而王统之故也。 人法地,地法天,天法道,道法自然。 法者,相因之义也。故语其序,则人处於地,形着而位分,地配乎天,而天犹有形,道贯三才,其体自然而已。谓推其相因之意,则是三者皆本於自然之道,盖分殊而道一也。故天在道之中,地在天之中,人在地之中,心在人之中,神在心之中,而会于道者也。是以神藏于心,心藏于形,形藏于地,地藏于天,天藏于道。文定曰:使人一日复性,则是三者,人皆足以尽之矣。
Interpretation

Dao (the Way) precedes the formation of Heaven and Earth (tiandi) and all things, which is why this chapter opens with "prior to Heaven and Earth" (xian tian di). Yet Dao has never left Heaven, Earth, and the myriad things, so the chapter also says "within the realm there are four greats" (yu zhong you si da). From the standpoint of Dao, Heaven, Earth, and the king (wang) cannot be called greater than Dao. But is Dao something that exists apart from Heaven, Earth, and the king? When we speak from the standpoint of the myriad things, people recognize only that Heaven, Earth, and the king are great and do not believe that Dao is great as well. That is why the text speaks this way. It does not mean that Dao is one thing among the myriad things. Students should not cling to the literal wording and so misunderstand the intended meaning.

The text goes on to say "the king is one of them" because the human being (ren) is regarded as the center of Heaven and Earth and is able to connect with Dao. Humans can follow the regularities of Heaven and Earth. Among all beings, the human has the most spirit (ling) and refinement, and the king governs the people, so the king is also counted among the four.

"Humanity follows Earth, Earth follows Heaven, Heaven follows Dao, and Dao follows what is so of itself (ziran)." Here, "follows" (fa) means to model oneself on and to carry on. In terms of levels, humans dwell upon the earth, where form becomes manifest and positions are distinguished. Earth corresponds with Heaven, and Heaven still has form. Dao pervades the three powers of Heaven, Earth, and humanity, and its essence is naturally so of itself. If we look at the relation of following one another, Heaven, Earth, and humanity all have their roots in the naturalness of Dao. Their forms differ, but the Dao they follow is one.

Therefore, Heaven is within the scope of Dao, Earth is within the scope of Heaven, humanity dwells within Earth, the heart-mind (xin) dwells within the human body, and spirit (shen) dwells within the heart-mind. Through this, humans can connect with Dao. Thus spirit is stored in the heart-mind, the heart-mind is stored in the body, the body is situated in Earth, Earth is situated in Heaven, and Heaven is situated in Dao. Wending (Wen Ding) says: "If a person can return to original nature (benxing) within a single day, then the principles of Heaven, Earth, and humanity will all be fully embodied in that person."

右二十五章河上名象元。此会于道者也。是以神藏于心,心藏于形,形藏于地,地藏于天,天藏于道。文定曰:使人一日复性,则是三者,人皆足以尽之矣。 右二十五章河上名象元。此章赞道大而自然也。 重为轻根,静为躁君。是以君子终日行,不离辎重。 重,直用切。轻,起政切。寡谋之类。躁,早报切。离,去声。辎,庄持切,大车也。君子之道以静重为主,不可须突离也,如辎车之重,不敢容易其行。 虽有荣观,燕处超然。 观,古乱切。处,上声。夫荣观在物,燕处在己,惟不以物易己,故游观荣乐,无所系着离也,如辎车之重,不敢容易其行。 虽有荣观,燕处超然。 观,古乱切。处,上声。夫荣观在物,燕处在己,惟不以物易己,故游观荣乐,无所系着,而超然自得於物外也。 如何万乘之主,而以身轻天下。轻则失臣,躁则失君。 乘,去声。身轻,如字。谓万乘之尊,不可纵所欲之私,而不顾天下之重也。轻则妄动,故失助於臣。躁则扰民,故失其为君之道。或云君轻则失助於臣,臣躁则失任於君矣。
Interpretation

"Heaviness" is the root of lightness, and "stillness" is the master of restlessness. Therefore, the junzi (exemplary person) never leaves the foundation of steadiness and gravity in the course of a day's affairs, just as a great cart carrying heavy loads does not dare to set off lightly.

Even when there are magnificent scenery and places for leisure, one can dwell at ease and remain detached and self-content. Outward glory and scenery are external things, while inner tranquility truly belongs to oneself. By not letting external things alter one's original heart, one will not be entangled by them while touring and enjoying, and can rise above worldly desires.

As the ruler who commands a state of ten thousand chariots, how could one treat oneself and the great affairs of the realm lightly? To act rashly is to lose the assistance of one's ministers; to be hasty in conduct is to lose the way of ruling. Another interpretation holds that if the ruler is careless, he loses the help of his ministers, and if the minister is hasty, he loses the ruler's trust.

右二十六章河上名重德。此章言静重然后可以为有物之主。或曰近取诸身,则心为君,气为臣,轻则心妄动而暴其气,躁则气扰乱而反动其心。盖君为民物之主,心为一身之主,所当静重则无为而成功。 善行无辙迹, 行,下孟切。轮辗地为辙,夫与道为何迹之有。 善言无瑕谪, 瑕,下家切,玭病也。谪,直革切,过惟和以天倪,故无口过。行,下孟切。轮辗地为辙,夫与道为何迹之有。 善言无瑕谪, 瑕,下家切,玭病也。谪,直革切,过惟和以天倪,故无口过。 善计不用筹策 道一而已,总括万有。 善闭无关楗而不可开, 楗,其偃切,拒门木也,横曰关,竖曰楗。无门无房,四达皇皇,而天地之大亦不能出乎其外,是谓善闭。 善结无绳约而不可解。 妙本湛然,不为法缚,不求法脱,堂堂密密,了无间然,所谓不可须臾离也。苟溺於刻意尚行,执言滞句,用心计度以求道,而不达方便之门,则反为教相所缚,故不能不为法缚,不求法脱,堂堂密密,了无间然,所谓不可须臾离也。苟溺於刻意尚行,执言滞句,用心计度以求道,而不达方便之门,则反为教相所缚,故不能彻见万法根元矣。所谓善者,无为而已。
Interpretation

This passage is from Chapter 26 of the Daodejing (Tao Te Ching). The commentator Heshang Gong (Heshang Gong) titles this chapter "Valuing De" (Chongde, "Honoring Virtue"). It holds that when a person stays calm and steady, they can become the master of all things.

Viewed in terms of the body and mind, the heart-mind (xin) is like a ruler, and the vital energy (qi) is like his ministers. When the heart-mind is restless and easily stirred, it disturbs the breath and robs it of its harmony. Disordered breath, in turn, unsettles the spirit. For this reason, the heart-mind should be quiet and steady, and one should act through wuwei (non-action). Matters then tend to succeed on their own.

The skilled traveler leaves no wheel tracks. This means that one who truly follows the Dao (the Way) does not deliberately leave traces that others could follow.

The skilled speaker makes no flaws or errors in speech. Such a person follows the natural measure of things and therefore does not err through improper words.

The skilled planner needs no counters or reckoning tools. The Dao is originally unified and able to encompass all things.

The skilled closer needs no bolts or bars, yet the door cannot be opened. The Dao is not a particular door or a particular room. It penetrates everywhere without obstruction and extends across heaven and earth, so heaven and earth cannot go beyond its reach. This is what is meant by "skilled at closing."

The skilled binder needs no rope, yet things cannot be untied. The subtle, fundamental Dao-body is pure, still, and profound. It is not bound by any rule, nor does it cling to escaping rules. It is dense and complete, without gaps, and never leaves even for a moment. If one persists in forced practice, clings to words and their meanings, and relies on thought and calculation to seek the Dao without understanding the flexible and penetrating way, one will instead be bound by various teachings and forms and will be unable to fully perceive the source of all things. What is called "skill" comes down, in the end, to wuwei.

是以圣人常善救人,故无弃人;常善救物,故无弃物。是谓袭明。 夫救人於危难,特救其形耳,而且未必能博,岂足为善哉。惟彼方执着有为,迷其性於暗蔽之中,而我以兼容之量容之,以先觉之明觉之,使彼之天光自发,如明灯之传袭无尽,而在我者既以与人己愈多,则其明亦何限量哉。叶梦得曰:常之为言,无时而不然也。 故善人,,以先觉之明觉之,使彼之天光自发,如明灯之传袭无尽,而在我者既以与人己愈多,则其明亦何限量哉。叶梦得曰:常之为言,无时而不然也。 故善人,不善人之师;不善人,善人之资。 谓因其不善而教之使善,乃所以为善救也。则是资其不善者,以为吾施教之地矣。林东曰:因其不善而不为之,是可资也。 不贵其师,不爱其资,虽智大迷,是谓要妙。 夫道之要妙,非教能到,故至於不贵不爱之地,则知无我。人虽大智而莫测,盖能所俱忘,是曰独化者也。 右二十七章河上名巧用。此章明名连双泯,教理兼忘。傅弈云:常善救人等两句,独得诸河上,古本无有也! 知其雄,守其雌,为天下溪。为、天下溪,常德不离,复归於婴儿。
Interpretation

The sage is always skilled at helping others, so no one is abandoned by them. They are always skilled at dealing with all things, so nothing is discarded by them. This is called ximing (inheriting and transmitting illumination). Saving people from danger rescues only their bodies, and often cannot reach everyone. How can that be considered true goodness? True goodness means meeting those who cling to deliberate action and, deluded, lose their original nature, with an open and embracing heart. It means then enlightening them with the wisdom of those who awakened first, so that the natural light within them (their innate clarity) appears. This is like one lamp passing its flame to another, so that the light continues without end. When wisdom is shared with others, it becomes even more abundant. How could it ever be exhausted? Ye Mengde said, "'Constantly' means that it is so at every moment."

Therefore, the good person is the teacher of the person who is not good, and the person who is not good is the resource on which the good person relies. When a good person sees another's failings, they use them to guide that person toward goodness. This is exactly what it means to be skilled at helping. In other words, the failings of others give the good person an opportunity to teach. Lin Dong said, "To see another's failings and not help them is precisely where the failings become something one can rely on."

Those who do not respect their teachers and do not value the resources they could rely on will fall into great confusion, however clever they may be. This is the "essential subtlety" (yaomiao), the essential and mysterious core of the Dao.

The subtlety of the Dao cannot be reached by teaching alone. When one reaches the state of clinging neither to the teacher nor to the resource, one understands how to stop centering on the self. Even a person of great wisdom finds this state difficult to fathom, because both the teacher and the one being taught no longer cling. This is called dúhuà (self-transformation, naturally changing of its own accord).

The above is Chapter Twenty-Seven. The Heshang Gong version of this chapter is titled "Skillful Use." This chapter shows that names, concepts, and attachments should all be dissolved, and that teaching and principles should not become fetters. Fu Yi said that the two lines beginning with "constantly skilled at saving people" appear only in the Heshang Gong version and are absent from the ancient texts.

To know the strong yet keep to the weak is to become the valley of the world, humble and able to receive all things. In this way, constant De (Virtue) is not lost, and one finally returns to the simple, natural state of an infant.

离,平声。知彼守此,则所守者非勉强而有常。夫雌静谦下,众必赴归,犹水附地。相守之审在乎有常,则雄动高强之念不作所守者非勉强而有常。夫雌静谦下,众必赴归,犹水附地。相守之审在乎有常,则雄动高强之念不作,故性醇气和,无欲之至,而赤子之心不失,此专气以致柔也。 知其白,守其黑,为天下式。为天下式,常德不忒,复归於无极。 以恬养智,与道冥一,则可为天下之所取式。以其德有常而不变不差,故用未尝穷,量未尝极,此恬与智交养而成和也。 知其荣,守其辱,为天下谷。为天下谷,常德乃足,复归於朴。 为众所归而取式,则荣矣。故处之以辱而受众垢,有如谷之能容能应而未尝 知其荣,守其辱,为天下谷。为天下谷,常德乃足,复归於朴。 为众所归而取式,则荣矣。故处之以辱而受众垢,有如谷之能容能应而未尝匮乏,则复於浑然之全体矣,此和行而成德也。自婴儿与无极,言入德之序,而复於朴,乃其所至之地也。 朴散则为器,圣人用之则为官长,故大制不割。
Interpretation

Holding fast to the feminine and yielding, to stillness and humility, what is thus kept will naturally endure without the need for forcing it. When one is feminine, still, and humble, the multitude will turn toward one, just as water flows to lower ground. To persist in this constant guarding is to keep aggressive, rash impulses from arising. Thus one's disposition becomes rich and mellow, one's breath becomes calm, desires are reduced to a minimum, and one can still retain the innocent heart of an infant. This is what is meant by concentrating one's jing (essence) and qi (vital energy) and bringing body and mind to a state of softness.

To understand what is bright yet keep to what is dark is to become a model for all under heaven. Becoming a model for all under heaven, one's constant De (Virtue) does not go astray, and in the end one returns to wuji (the boundless, the nameless source).

To nourish wisdom through tranquility, so that one's shen (spirit) merges with the Dao (the Way), is to become a model for all under heaven. Because one's De is constant and free of error, its functioning is inexhaustible and its capacity without bounds. This is the mutual nourishing of tranquility and wisdom, leading to harmony.

To understand what is glorious yet abide in disgrace is to become a valley for all under heaven, receiving all things as a mountain valley does. Becoming a valley for all under heaven, one's constant De becomes full, and in the end one returns to pu (the uncarved block, natural authenticity).

To become the one whom the multitude turns to and emulates is glory. Therefore one must dwell in disgrace, bearing the defilement of the crowd, able to receive and respond to all things as a valley does without being exhausted, and so return to the whole and undivided substance. This is the practice of De in peace and its accomplishment. Here the text moves from infantile innocence and wuji to the sequence by which one enters De; returning to pu is the final state reached.

Once the pu is divided, it takes the form of various vessels. When the sage uses these vessels, he can become the head of all officials; thus truly great construction does not cut apart the whole.

长,上声。朴即道也,形而上者谓之道,归於朴则体斯立焉。形而下者谓之器,故散朴为器以应万物,道之用所以行也。圣人用此道以为民物之主,亦因其理势之自然,虽制而非有所裁割。曹曰:大制犹天地之造物,物
Interpretation

The character zhang is read in the third tone. Pu is Dao. That which transcends concrete form is called Dao, and when one returns to pu, the uncarved block, the fundamental nature of Dao is established. That which has concrete form is called qi, the vessel, which is distinct from vital qi. Thus Dao disperses and transforms into the myriad things, responding to what each thing requires, and this is the function of Dao. The sage (shengren) uses this Dao to become the master of the common people and of all things, yet acts only by following the inherent patterns and tendencies of things. Although the sage makes and shapes, there is no deliberate cutting or forcible alteration. Master Cao says: "Dazhi," the great shaping, is like Heaven and Earth bringing the myriad things into being, each following its own nature...

随性

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback