中文 · EN

《周易参同契发挥》Vol. 4

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書 Vol. 4 / 4 8,652 characters

About this page. The original text of 《周易参同契发挥》 Vol. 4 (Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書, 4 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 19 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《周易参同契发挥》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

上震出为征其间言戊己与浑沌者三言三五与晦朔者四文义重复如此窃意三人各述一篇之说未必不然而经注相杂则又不知孰为经孰为注也愚欲以四言五言散文各从其分而为三庶经注不相混殽以便后学参究然书既成不复改作姑诵所闻于卷末以俟后之明者 周易防同契发挥卷下 钦定四库全书 周易参同契发挥释疑 宋 俞琰 撰 上篇 匡郭一本匡作垣陈抱一注本改为围郭避讳也运毂正轴谓修丹当正其心犹运毂当正其轴也轴在毂内以贯于毂辐则又在毂之外以辏于毂者也一本轴作辐非是 牝牡四卦盖缴上文乾坤门户坎离匡郭之句总言之也此四毂内以贯于毂辐则又在毂之外以辏于毂者也一本轴作辐非是 牝牡四卦盖缴上文乾坤门户坎离匡郭之句总言之也此四卦乃鼎器药物后言六十卦乃火候也如中篇谓四者浑沌亦是缴上文干刚坤柔坎离冠首之句后又曰六十卦用张布为舆恰成六十四卦六十四卦皆为吾丹道之用此所以为周易参同契也一本以牝牡四卦为震兑巽艮非是 以为橐钥凝神子陈会真注本以作互
Interpretation

The upper Zhen trigram stirs into activity and becomes manifest. The text mentions Wu, Ji, and Chaos in three places, and the Three-Five and the dark moon and new moon in four places. Some passages in the scripture are repeated. In my view, it is possible that three people each wrote one piece; this cannot be ruled out. But because the scripture and commentary are intermingled, it is difficult to tell which parts are scripture and which are commentary. I once thought of sorting the four-character lines, five-character lines, and prose into three sections, so that scripture and commentary would not be mixed together and later students could study them more easily. However, now that the book has been completed, I will leave it as it is. For now, I record at the end of the volume what I have heard, leaving it to discerning people of later generations to judge.

Exposition of the Zhouyi Cantongqi, juan 2

Imperially Commissioned Collection of the Four Treasuries

Clarifications on the Exposition of the Zhouyi Cantongqi

Written by Yu Yan of the Song dynasty

Part One

“Framing”: One version reads “frame.” Chen Baoyi’s annotated edition changes this to “enclosing frame” to avoid a taboo. “Turning the hub and straightening the axle” means that in cultivating the elixir method one should set the mind aright, just as the axle must remain straight when the wheel hub turns. The axle passes through the hub, while the spokes sit outside it and converge at the hub. One version reads “spokes” instead of “axle,” but that is incorrect.

“The four male and female trigrams”—the four trigrams in which Yin and Yang are paired—continues and summarizes the preceding phrases, “Heaven and Earth as the doorway, Kan and Li as the frame.” These four trigrams refer to the vessel and the medicines; the sixty trigrams discussed later refer to the firing times, the arrangement of timing and heat in the elixir process. The middle section says, “The four form Chaos,” likewise continuing the preceding phrase, “Qian is firm, Kun is yielding, and Kan and Li stand at the head.” Later it says, “The sixty trigrams are laid out and spread as a carriage,” completing the set of sixty-four trigrams. All sixty-four trigrams are used to explain my Dao of the Elixir, which is why this book is called the Zhouyi Cantongqi. One version explains “the four male and female trigrams” as the trigrams Zhen, Dui, Xun, and Gen, but this is incorrect.

“Making them serve as bellows”: In the annotated edition by Ning Shen Zi Chen Huizhen, the text reads “mutually.”

犹御者之执衔辔有准绳正规矩随轨辙处中以制外谓如御者处于车中而能制御马之进退以合乎规绳也盖与中篇龙马就驾明君御时意同旧本犹御者之执衔辔有准绳作犹工御者执衔辔准绳墨非是前辈乃承误注释以为谓如御者处于车中而能制御马之进退以合乎规绳也盖与中篇龙马就驾明君御时意同旧本犹御者之执衔辔有准绳作犹工御者执衔辔准绳墨非是前辈乃承误注释以为犹工者之于绳墨规矩御者之于衔辔轨辙误矣 兼并为六十谓日用两卦一月三十日兼并为六十卦也一本作兼并为六十四非是 用之依次序一本依作如 既未至昧爽即下文晦至朔旦之谓也一本昧作晦非是盖既未即月晦昧爽即月朔若以为既未至晦爽则犹言晦至晦爽于文义大谬矣 春夏据内体从子到辰巳秋冬当外用自午讫戌亥盖以两卦并言前一卦属春夏自子至巳阳自下而升也后一卦属秋冬自午至亥阴自上冬当外用自午讫戌亥盖以两卦并言前一卦属春夏自子至巳阳自下而升也后一卦属秋冬自午至亥阴自上而降也若只以一卦言则一卦止有六爻以十二时配之恰欠其半毕竟日用两卦直事须当以两卦并言 得其序一本序作理 变化于中晦庵朱子注本变化作升降一本作升降变化于其中 包裹盖用文子通真经语旧本作包囊非是
Interpretation

It is like a charioteer sitting upright in the carriage, holding the reins and guiding the horses by the proper measures and rules, so that the carriage follows its track and the horses’ advance and retreat remain under control. The meaning here is the same as the line in the middle section of The Seal of the Unity of the Three (Zhouyi Cantong Qi): “The dragon-horse is harnessed; the enlightened ruler governs the seasons.” Older editions give the phrase “as a charioteer holds the bit and reins according to measures” as “as a skilled charioteer holds the bit and reins, measures, and ink lines.” This is incorrect. Earlier scholars perpetuated the error and explained it to mean that a craftsperson relies on ink lines and rules, while a charioteer relies on reins and tracks. That interpretation is also incorrect.

“Combined, they make sixty” refers to using two hexagrams each day. Over the thirty days of a month, this makes sixty hexagrams in all. Another version reads “combined, they make sixty-four,” which is incorrect.

In “use them in sequence,” some versions read “as” instead of “in.”

“From the end of the month to dawn” refers to the period described below, from the last day of the lunar month until dawn on the first day of the new month. “End of the month” means the month’s final day, while “dawn” means the time just before sunrise at the start of the month. If “dawn” is changed to “the last day of the month,” the passage would read “from the last day of the month to the last day of the month,” which makes no sense.

“Spring and summer pertain to the inner aspect, from the Zi hour to the Chen and Si hours; autumn and winter pertain to the outer aspect, from noon until the Xu and Hai hours.” This describes two hexagrams together: the first corresponds to spring and summer, from the Zi hour to the Si hour, as Yang Qi rises from below; the second corresponds to autumn and winter, from the Wu hour to the Hai hour, as Yin Qi descends from above. If this were understood as describing just one hexagram, its six lines would have to correspond to twelve two-hour periods, covering only half the day. The passage should therefore be understood as referring to the use of two hexagrams each day.

Some versions read “obtain its principle” instead of “obtain its sequence.”

Zhu Xi’s commentary edition from the Huian school gives “changes within” as “rises and descents change within it.” Another version also reads “rises and descents change within it.”

The term “envelop and contain” comes from the wording of the Wenzi Tongxuan Zhenjing. Older editions read “wrap and contain,” which is incorrect.

以无制有乃是制造之制非制御之制也大丹之法于无中造出有来故曰以无制有如作制御之制发明而以无为神为汞为离以有为气为铅为坎此亦是一说然非魏公本旨愚尝反覆考之盖因龙虎经有所谓有无相制朱雀炎空于是后人更不究上下文之义竟以制造之制作制御之制说了又如中篇谓刚柔断矣不相涉入言刚柔不相侵逾也故继之曰五行守界不妄盈缩却与后章刚柔离分之义不同或又泥乎龙御之制说了又如中篇谓刚柔断矣不相涉入言刚柔不相侵逾也故继之曰五行守界不妄盈缩却与后章刚柔离分之义不同或又泥乎龙虎经有所谓刚柔抗衡不相涉入非火之咎谴责于土之说亦未免以刚柔离分之义说了今人相传皆谓魏伯阳因龙虎经而作参同契故不得不祖龙虎经之说殊不知龙虎经乃是括参同契之语实出于魏公之后晦庵朱子云后人见魏伯阳传有龙虎上经一句遂伪作此经大槩皆是体参同契而为之其间盖有说错了处愚向者未得其说亦弗敢便以朱子此论为然后来反覆玩味以参同契相对互考其说乃觉龙虎经之破绽旁出而真是括参同契之语也盖魏公之作参同契乃是假借周易爻象发明作丹之秘非推广龙虎经之说若果推广龙虎经之说则当曰龙虎参同契不得谓之周易参同契也然而龙虎经亦非推广龙虎经之说若果推广龙虎经之说则当曰龙虎参同契不得谓之周易参同契也然而龙虎经亦是好文字是故蔡季通深喜其言如曰元君始炼汞神室含洞虚又曰自然之要先存后亡诚为至论但不是魏公以前之书耳
Interpretation

In the phrase “using nonbeing to create being,” “create” means to make or bring into existence, not to restrain or control. The method of the Great Elixir—the elixir sought through Daoist Neidan or alchemical cultivation—is to bring “being” forth from “nonbeing.” Hence the phrase “using nonbeing to create being.” Some interpret “create” as “control” and go on to say that “nonbeing” means spirit, mercury, and the Li trigram, while “being” means Qi, lead, and the Kan trigram. That is one interpretation, but it is not Wei Boyang’s original meaning.

After examining this repeatedly, I have come to think that the misunderstanding probably arose because the Scripture of the Dragon and Tiger contains expressions such as “being and nonbeing control one another; the Vermilion Bird blazes in the void.” Later readers failed to investigate the context carefully and took “create” to mean “control.”

For example, the middle section of the Cantong qi says, “Firmness and yielding are cut apart; they do not enter into one another.” This means that firmness and yielding each keep to their proper place and do not encroach on one another. It then says, “The Five Phases keep to their boundaries and do not increase or diminish arbitrarily,” likewise meaning that each of the Five Phases stays within its limits and does not change at will. This differs from the meaning of “firmness and yielding are separated” later in the text. Some readers, fixating on the phrase “the dragon’s control” in the Scripture of the Dragon and Tiger, interpret this passage as referring to control as well.

Others explain it by citing the Scripture of the Dragon and Tiger: “Firmness and yielding contend with one another and do not enter into one another; this is not the fire’s fault, but blame falls on Earth.” This too can lead them to confuse its meaning with that of “firmness and yielding are separated.” People today often say that Wei Boyang wrote the Cantong qi only after reading the Upper Scripture of the Dragon and Tiger, and therefore had to borrow its language. In fact, they do not realize that the Scripture of the Dragon and Tiger was written by summarizing the contents of the Cantong qi, and dates from after Wei Boyang.

Zhu Xi once said that later readers saw the words “Upper Scripture of the Dragon and Tiger” in Wei Boyang’s biography and forged a text under that title, largely modeled on the Cantong qi, with some of its claims misinterpreted. At first, I too did not understand the reasoning and dared not immediately conclude that Zhu Xi was right. Only after studying both books repeatedly and comparing them did I find many flaws in the Scripture of the Dragon and Tiger, which does indeed seem to have been composed as a summary of the Cantong qi.

In writing the Cantong qi, Wei Boyang used the hexagrams, lines, images, and numbers of the Zhouyi to explain the mysteries of alchemical practice. He was not expanding on the Scripture of the Dragon and Tiger. If he had been, the book should have been titled the Dragon and Tiger Cantong qi, not the Zhouyi Cantong qi.

Nevertheless, the Scripture of the Dragon and Tiger is also a good book. Cai Jitong greatly admired passages in it, such as “The Primordial Lord first refines mercury; the spirit chamber contains the void within the grotto,” and “The essential principle of spontaneity is to preserve first and then let go.” These passages do make good sense. The text, however, was not written before Wei Boyang.

器用者空李抱素注本者作皆 为征一本征作证 相当一本当作合非是 始终一本作终始非是 皆禀中宫一本禀作在一本作中宫所禀非是 之时一本时作际 统黄化一本作化黄包 鄞鄂朱子考异作根鄂鄂即萼也诗云鄂不韡靴是此鄂字或作垠堮或作圻堮或作釿锷皆非是 之时一本时作际 统黄化一本作化黄包 鄞鄂朱子考异作根鄂鄂即萼也诗云鄂不韡靴是此鄂字或作垠堮或作圻堮或作釿锷皆非是 称元皇一本称作当 元年一本年作 乃芽滋一本作芽乃生一本作乃牙滋 复卦建始初或疑与关睢建始初重复遂改初为萌朱子谓此乃不识古韵者妄改之也又如下文九六亦相当或疑与刚柔相当重复而改当为应皆非是 日月无双明谓日出则月没月出则日没昼夜递照迭为出没也一本无作非是盖古先无字皆作无如易所谓无妄无咎皆此无字一本作焕炳而成双 兔者吐生光一本作兔魄吐精光一本作兔魄吐生光东方丧其明旧本作东北丧其明盖因易有东北丧朋皆作无如易所谓无妄无咎皆此无字一本作焕炳而成双
Interpretation

“Vessels are useful because they are empty” means that a vessel can serve its purpose precisely because it has an empty space within it.

Regarding variant readings: some editions have “as proof” instead of “as evidence”; “correspond” instead of “match”; “beginning and end” instead of “end and beginning”; and “all receive from the central palace” instead of “all are in the central palace”—while others read “what the central palace provides.” Some editions have “at that time” instead of “at that juncture,” and “transforming yellow and enclosing” instead of “unifying and transforming yellow.”

In Zhu Xi’s textual notes, “Yin’e” is written as “Gen’e.” “E” means the calyx of a flower; the character has the same meaning in the ancient poem “The calyx blooms in splendor.” Some have written it as “Yin’e,” “Qi’e,” or “Jin’e,” but the commentator considers all these forms incorrect.

Some editions read “should accord with the Primordial Sovereign” instead of “be called the Primordial Sovereign.” In some, the character “year” in “primordial year” is written as “.” Some editions have “then the sprouts flourish” instead of “then the buds grow” or “the buds then flourish.”

Some suspected that “The Fu hexagram establishes the beginning” repeats the phrase “Guanju establishes the beginning,” and so changed “beginning” to “sprout.” Zhu Xi considered this an unauthorized alteration by someone who did not understand ancient rhyme. Below, some likewise changed “accord” in “the nine and six also accord” to “respond,” because it repeats “firm and yielding accord.” The commentator considers these changes incorrect.

“The sun and moon do not shine together” describes their alternating light: when the sun rises, the moon disappears; when the moon rises, the sun disappears, and day and night take turns. Some editions write “” instead of “not,” but the commentator considers this incorrect, since in ancient books the character “not” is the same one used in “no delusion” and “no blame.” Another edition reads, “Their brilliance shines forth as a pair.”

Some editions read “The hare’s soul releases vital light” or “The hare’s soul releases light” instead of “The hare releases living light.” “Hare’s soul” refers to the moon; the line says that the moon pours forth its radiance. An older edition reads “the northeast loses its light” instead of “the east loses its light,” but the commentator considers “east” the original reading.

兔者吐生光一本作兔魄吐精光一本作兔魄吐生光东方丧其明旧本作东北丧其明盖因易有东北丧朋之语遂相承其误习之而弗察也按坤卦云西南得朋东北丧朋盖谓坤位西南西有兑南有离巽皆阴卦也以阴从阴故云得朋若东北则震艮坎干皆阳卦也故云丧朋今魏公谓坤乙三十日东方丧其明盖言三十日之晨太阴没于东方乙位即非用坤卦东北丧朋之说何以明之盖西方庚辛南方丙丁东方甲乙乃一月六节内太阴昏见晨没之地王保义所谓月有三移是也今夫月之三日昏见于西方庚至十六则晨没于西方辛八日昏见于南方丁至二十三则晨没于南方丙十五日昏见于东方甲至三十则晨没于东方乙其理盖晓然矣岂得乙为东北耶自古方丁至二十三则晨没于南方丙十五日昏见于东方甲至三十则晨没于东方乙其理盖晓然矣岂得乙为东北耶自古甲之与乙俱列于东方即不在东北今以乙为东北则十五干体就之时曷不谓之盛满甲东北耶甲近东北且不谓之东北何况乙在甲之前而又近东南其非东北也明矣 九六亦相当上文复卦建始初下已释之 易象索灭藏谓三十日之夜日月之象俱沈于北方也一本易象作阳非是
Interpretation

“ The moon’s soul emits brilliant light” (some editions read “The moon emits life-giving light” or “The moon’s soul emits life-giving light”) refers to the moon shining with brilliant light. “The East loses its brightness” appears in an old edition as “The Northeast loses its brightness.” This error arose from borrowing the wording “the Northeast loses its companions” in the Book of Changes.

The Kun hexagram says, “In the southwest, one gains companions; in the northeast, one loses companions.” Kun is positioned in the southwest. The west corresponds to Dui, and the south to Li and Xun; all are Yin trigrams. Yin follows Yin, so this is called “gaining companions.” The trigrams Zhen, Gen, Kan, and Qian in the northeastern region are Yang trigrams, so this is called “losing companions.” When Wei Boyang says, “Kun, Yi, the thirtieth day; the East loses its brightness,” he means that at dawn on the thirtieth day, the moon sets in the east, at the Yi position. He is not alluding to the Kun hexagram’s phrase “the Northeast loses its companions.”

The Geng and Xin positions in the west, Bing and Ding in the south, and Jia and Yi in the east correspond to where the moon appears at dusk and disappears at dawn over the course of a month. The “three shifts of the moon” described by Wang Baoyi refer to these changes: on the third day, the moon appears at dusk in the west, at the Geng position; by the sixteenth day, it sets at dawn in the west, at the Xin position. On the eighth day, it appears at dusk in the south, at the Ding position; by the twenty-third day, it sets at dawn in the south, at the Bing position. On the fifteenth day, it appears at dusk in the east, at the Jia position; by the thirtieth day, it sets at dawn in the east, at the Yi position. The reasoning is clear: Yi belongs to the east, so how could it be said to lie in the northeast? Since ancient times, Jia and Yi have both been assigned to the east, not the northeast. Jia is close to the northeast, yet is still not called northeastern; Yi lies before Jia and is closer to the southeast, so it is even less possible to place it in the northeast.

The line “Nine and Six also correspond” was already explained above, in the discussion of the Fu hexagram.

“The images of the Changes vanish and lie concealed” refers to the night of the thirtieth day, when the images of both sun and moon sink away in the north. Some editions read “Yang lines” instead of “images of the Changes”; this is incorrect.

The lines “It resembles the midwinter season; by dawn, afterward, life is born blind” were misplaced in the postscript in an old edition. Chen Baoyi moved them to before “The Zi position should turn to the right,” but neither arrangement is suitable. In this chapter, the pattern is for every two lines to rhyme.

象彼仲冬节至以晓后生盲旧本错于后序陈抱一移置子当右转之前皆非是按此章凡押两之 易象索灭藏谓三十日之夜日月之象俱沈于北方也一本易象作阳非是 象彼仲冬节至以晓后生盲旧本错于后序陈抱一移置子当右转之前皆非是按此章凡押两伤字并上文易象索灭藏连之则又押两藏字盖古人多用重韵后人不晓往往妄乱迁改遂使文意不连属如上文关雎建始初与复卦建始初又如刚柔相当与九六亦相当皆重韵也岂可遽以重韵而害其正文哉 商旅一本商作贾 浩广一本广作旷 眇难睹一本睹作觌 符征一本征作证 节令一本节作时 中稽于人心一本心作情 依卦变一本作循卦节 循彖辞一本循作因彖作象非是 乾坤用施行天地然后治一本治作理一本作天下然后治此二句似乎引用乾卦乾元用九天下治之文然按上文坎离者乾坤二用则是坎离为乾坤之用非然后治此二句似乎引用乾卦乾元用九天下治之文然按上文坎离者乾坤二用则是坎离为乾坤之用非谓用九用六也如上文东方丧其明亦非用坤卦东北丧朋之义盖魏公之为是书大率皆是假借正不必牵泥也 可不慎乎一本作可得不慎乎非是 魁杓一本杓作柄 誃离即别离也一本作移离一本作坎离 仰俯他本皆作俯仰朱子谓当作仰俯乃叶韵今从之统录一本统作总 日含五行精一本含作合非是 诘过贻主一本作结过移主 辰极处正一本处作受一本正作政 布政一本作政德非是 终修一本修作循一本作中美
Interpretation

Its meaning is like the arrival of the midwinter solar term, intended to enlighten later students.” The old edition mistakenly placed this passage in the preface that follows, while Chen Baoyi moved it to before “the Zi position turns to the right.” Neither arrangement is correct. In this chapter, the character shang (“harm”) in “the two harms” rhymes; the character cang (“conceal”) in the earlier phrase “the images of the Changes are sought, then extinguished and concealed” also rhymes. This shows that the ancients often repeated rhyme words. Later readers did not understand this and frequently altered the text on their own, making the meaning disjointed. For example, “Guanju establishes the beginning” and “the Fu hexagram establishes the beginning” above, as well as “firmness and yielding correspond” and “the nines and sixes likewise correspond,” repeat rhyme words. A repeated rhyme is no reason to alter the main text lightly.

The following are variant readings and textual judgments:

“Merchants and travelers”: one edition reads “merchants and traders.”

“Vast and broad”: one edition reads “vast and open.”

“Dim and hard to see”: one edition writes “see” with the character meaning “discern.”

“Sign and verification”: one edition reads “sign and proof.”

“Seasonal order”: one edition uses “time” instead of “season.”

“Measured against the human heart”: one edition reads “feelings” instead of “heart.”

“Following the changes of the hexagrams”: another edition reads “following the sequence of the hexagrams.”

“Following the judgments”: one edition reads “because of” instead of “following,” and “images” instead of “judgments.” This reading is incorrect.

“Qian and Kun put their functions into practice; only then are Heaven and Earth well governed”: one edition reads “well ordered” instead of “well governed”; another reads, “only then is all under Heaven well governed.” These lines seem to draw on the meaning of the Qian hexagram’s phrase, “Qian’s first potency employs the nine; all under Heaven is governed.” But in light of the earlier statement, “Kan and Li are the two functions of Qian and Kun,” the point here is that Kan and Li are the two functions of Qian and Kun; it does not refer to Qian’s use of the nine and Kun’s use of the six. The earlier phrase “the east loses its brightness” likewise does not allude to the Kun hexagram’s “in the northeast, it loses its companions.” Wei Boyang, the author of the Cantong qi, often borrowed hexagram images and phrases to express his ideas, so one need not insist on their literal sources.

“Could one fail to be cautious?” One edition reads, “Could one possibly fail to be cautious?” This reading is incorrect.

“Kui and the handle”: one edition writes “handle” with the character meaning “shaft.”

“To part and separate” means to go one’s separate ways. One edition reads “move apart”; another reads “Kan and Li.”

“Looking up and looking down”: all other editions read “looking down and looking up.” Zhu Xi argued that it should read “looking up and looking down,” which fits the rhyme; that reading is adopted here. “Collect and record”: one edition uses “summarize” instead of “collect.”

“The sun contains the essence of the Five Phases (Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, and Water)”: one edition reads “unites” instead of “contains.” This reading is incorrect.

“Questioning faults and handing them to the master”: one edition reads “settling faults and transferring them to the master.”

“The celestial pivot occupies the proper position”: one edition reads “receives” instead of “occupies”; another reads “government” instead of “proper.”

“Establishing government”: one edition reads “government and De.” This reading is incorrect.

“Ultimately cultivate”: one edition reads “follow” instead of “cultivate”; another reads “central beauty.”

以掩蔽一本以作已 有无亦相须谓水火二气相资而成造化也有无或作金炁或作吟皆非是 进退分布一本进退作退而非是 采之白一本采作望一本作揺二气相资而成造化也有无或作金炁或作吟皆非是 进退分布一本进退作退而非是 采之白一本采作望一本作揺 白里一本作包裹 相扶一本扶作拘 相连一本连作通 是非历藏法谓此道非历五脏存思之法也若以是非两字作是是非非之义则误矣 次日辰一本次作以非是 累土一本作周 而意悦一本作意悦喜 跨火不焦入水不濡道成之后法身则然若以血肉之躯投畀水火则岂特焦濡而已哉 移居一本居作名非是 功满一本满作成非是 偃月按下文曰汞日则偃疑作铅音声相传之讹耳作鼎炉旧本作作法非是 艮亦八一本作亦如之 亏明一本明作伤 金本从日生朔旦受日符谓月之光从日而生毎月朔旦与日相合之讹耳作鼎炉旧本作作法非是 艮亦八一本作亦如之 亏明一本明作伤 金本从日生朔旦受日符谓月之光从日而生毎月朔旦与日相合也盖金火即日月也旧本日作月非是若以为金本从月生则犹曰月本从月生此何义理 数称五一本数作号 含育一本作贪欲
Interpretation

“By concealment, one takes the root—the fundamental source—as oneself.”

“Being” and “nonbeing” depend on one another. This refers to the mutual support of the two Qi energies, Water and Fire, bringing about the transformations of all things. In some versions, “being and nonbeing” is written as “Metal Qi” or “chanting”; both readings are incorrect.

In some versions, “distribution through advance and retreat” has “retreat” where it should read “advance.” This is incorrect.

In some versions, “gathering it, its color white” has “gazing” or “shaking” where it should read “gathering.” This passage describes the mutual support of the two Qi energies, Water and Fire, and the transformations they bring about. Some versions also write “being and nonbeing” as “Metal Qi” or “chanting”; both readings are incorrect.

In some versions, “within the white” is written as “enveloping.”

In some versions, “supporting one another” has “restrain” where it should read “support.”

In some versions, “connected to one another” has “communicate” where it should read “connect.”

“Whether or not this is the method of storing” means that this is not a cultivation method in which one visualizes the Five Viscera in sequence. It is incorrect to understand “whether or not” as “right and wrong.”

In some versions, “the next day and hour” has “by” where it should read “next.” This is incorrect.

In some versions, “heaped earth” is written as “surrounding area.”

In some versions, “and the mind is pleased” is written as “the mind is pleased and joyful.”

“Crossing fire without being scorched, entering water without getting wet” describes what the Dharma Body—the nonphysical body said to result from successful cultivation—can do after one has cultivated the Dao. If a flesh-and-blood body were put into water or fire, would it merely be scorched or get wet?

In some versions, “move residence” has “name” where it should read “residence.” This is incorrect.

In some versions, “when the work is complete” has “accomplished” where it should read “complete.” This is incorrect.

Judging from the following reference to “Mercury Sun,” “Crescent Moon” may be a corruption, passed down through pronunciation, of the word for “Lead.” “Sounds transmitted by word of mouth” may be a corruption of “crucible and furnace.” The old edition reads “perform the method,” which is incorrect.

In some versions, “Gen is also eight” is written as “also like this.”

In some versions, “diminished brightness” has “wound” where it should read “brightness.”

“Metal originally arises from the sun; at the new moon, it receives the sun’s tally” means that moonlight comes from the sun, and that on the first day of each month, the new moon aligns with the sun. “Metal and Fire” also refer to the sun and moon. The old edition has “moon” where it should read “sun.” To say that Metal originally arises from the moon would be like saying that the moon originally arises from the moon, which makes no sense.

In some versions, “the number is called five” has “name” where it should read “number.”

In some versions, “nourishing and nurturing” is written as “greed and desire.”

伫息谓凝伫呼吸之息二者合而为一如夫妇之交合也一本息作思一本作恩皆非是 执平一本执作气 土游于四季守界定规矩诸本皆在寿命得长久之下惟郑虚一本却在本性共宗祖之下 金以砂为主禀和于水银即是直指凡砂凡汞之造化以譬喻丹法之造化却非假借外一物以比并内一物相对而言也 以黍一本黍作粟非是 其卵一本卵作子非是 是直指凡砂凡汞之造化以譬喻丹法之造化却非假借外一物以比并内一物相对而言也 以黍一本黍作粟非是 其卵一本卵作子非是 泥汞一本汞作澒 炼飞一本飞作治一本作持 鼓铸一本铸作下非是 杂性不同一本作种 侥幸讫不遇圣人独知之朱子本无此十字 生狐疑一本生作坐 始画八卦效法天地一本作始画八卦象效法天地图一本作画八卦效天图皆非是 循而一本作结体 庶圣谓无位之圣人也孔子是己一本作圣者与非是三君一本君作圣 令可法一本令作诚 为世定此效天图皆非是 循而一本作结体 庶圣谓无位之圣人也孔子是己一本作圣者与非是三君一本君作圣 令可法一本令作诚 为世定此书谓金丹大道无形无兆无以使后人取法故定此参同契一书于世与中篇定录斯文义同旧本作为世定诗书非是 窃为一本为作待
Interpretation

“Focused breathing” refers to breathing practiced with the spirit gathered and still. Here, it means that breathing and gathered attention merge into one, like a husband and wife coming together. Some editions write “thought” or “kindness” in place of “breath”; both are incorrect.

“Maintaining balance”: some editions write “holding to Qi,” which is incorrect.

“Earth moves through the four seasons, keeping to its bounds and established order”: all editions place this under “longevity is attained”; only one edition by Zheng Xu places it under “nature shares a common origin with the ancestors.”

“Metal takes sand as its basis, receiving harmony from mercury” directly uses the changes in sand and mercury themselves as a metaphor for the changes in the Elixir method. It does not use some external substance to represent another, internal substance. Some editions write “millet” as “grain,” which is incorrect; they also write “egg” as “seed,” which is likewise incorrect.

“Clay mercury”: some editions write “hong” in place of “mercury.”

“Refining and sublimating”: some editions write “refining and treating” or “refining and holding.”

“Drumming and casting”: some editions write “down” in place of “casting,” which is incorrect.

“Mixed natures belong to different kinds”: some editions write “species” in place of “kinds.”

“By good fortune, they never encountered the sage, who alone knew this”: Zhu Xi’s edition omits the final ten characters, “who alone knew this.”

“Grows doubtful”: some editions write “sits” in place of “grows.”

“First he drew the Eight Trigrams, modeling them on Heaven and Earth”: some editions read “First he drew images of the Eight Trigrams, modeling them on the maps of Heaven and Earth,” or “He drew the Eight Trigrams, modeling them on the map of Heaven.” Both are incorrect.

“Following it”: some editions write “forming the body.”

“Unheralded sages” refers to sages without prominent status; Confucius was such a person. Some editions read “the sage and those who follow,” which is incorrect. In “the three lords,” some editions write “sage” in place of “lord.”

“Can serve as a model”: some editions write “sincerity” in place of “command.”

“Composing this book for the world” means that the Great Dao of the Golden Elixir has no form or signs, so later generations have no basis on which to follow it. Therefore, the author composed the Cantong qi for the world. This is the same idea as “establishing this text” in the middle section. The old edition reads “composing poetry and books for the world,” which is incorrect.

“Secretly doing”: some editions write “waiting” in place of “doing.”

辄思虑一本作缀斯愚非是 金计有十五水数亦如之即前章所谓上兑数八下艮亦八也盖上金半斤下水半斤以两相合而观之则成一月三十日之数却与水中金之义不同一本金计有十五作金数十有五 其土遂不入二者与之俱三物相含受变化状若神此三物即是金水土三件金水二者与土有十五作金数十有五 其土遂不入二者与之俱三物相含受变化状若神此三物即是金水土三件金水二者与土合而为一故曰三物相含受若又添水火言则成五物矣或以三物为金火木以二者为水火冗杂迨甚非至论也一本其土作其三二者作火二又作水二皆非是 捣治一本作铸冶 致完坚一本致作致 炎火张于下龙虎声正勤与下篇升熬于甑山兮炎火张设下白虎倡导前兮苍龙和于后实同一义旧本龙虎作昼夜非是 始文使可修一本作始初文可修 亲观一本作相亲一本作须亲 服之一本作粉提一本作粉捏一本作提粉皆非是一丸一本丸作元一本作粒皆非是 刀圭即是刀头圭角些子而已言其不多也若以刀为金圭为二土巧则巧矣然非魏公之本旨也 较约一本较作简 光明一本明作荣非是 薄圭即是刀头圭角些子而已言其不多也若以刀为金圭为二土巧则巧矣然非魏公之本旨也 较约一本较作简 光明一本明作荣非是 薄蚀一本作激薄
Interpretation

This means pondering something repeatedly in one’s heart; another copy reads “zhui,” which is incorrect.

The number of Metal is fifteen, and the number of Water is the same. As stated earlier, the waxing half-moon corresponds to the Dui trigram, with a value of eight; the waning half-moon corresponds to the Gen trigram, also with a value of eight. The Metal of the waxing half-moon amounts to half a jin, and the Water of the waning half-moon also amounts to half a jin. Taken together, the two halves correspond exactly to the thirty days of a month. This, however, differs from the meaning of “Metal within Water.” Another copy reads “the count of Metal is fifteen” in place of “the number of Metal is fifteen.”

Earth is not added separately. Metal and Water combine with Earth; the three substances contain one another and transform in ways beyond measure. These three substances are Metal, Water, and Earth. If Water and Fire are included as well, there are five substances. Some say the three are Metal, Fire, and Wood, and that “the two” are Water and Fire. This is thoroughly confused and certainly not a correct interpretation. Another copy reads “the three” for “Earth,” and “Fire, two” or “Water, two” for “the two”; both are incorrect.

Another copy reads “casting and smelting” for “pounding and refining.”

Another copy writes the character “zhi” differently in “bring it to completion and hardness.”

“Flames blaze below; the Dragon and Tiger respond in earnest” has the same meaning as the passage in the following chapter: “It rises and is heated on the steaming mountain; flames are set blazing below. The White Tiger leads the way in front; the Azure Dragon answers from behind.” Both describe the fire being applied below during the refining process, with the Dragon and Tiger responding to one another. An old copy reads “day and night” for “Dragon and Tiger,” which is incorrect.

Another copy reads “the initial pattern can be cultivated” for “the beginning pattern makes it possible to cultivate.”

Another copy reads “mutually close” for “personally observe”; yet another reads “must personally observe.”

Another copy reads “powder and lift,” “powder and knead,” or “lift the powder” for “take it”; all are incorrect. Another copy reads “yuan” or “grain” for “one pill”; both are incorrect.

“Knife-tip measure” means an extremely tiny amount resting on the tip of a knife, and indicates that the dose is very small. Explaining “knife” as Metal and “gui” as two Earths may be ingenious, but it was not Wei Boyang’s original meaning.

Another copy reads “simple” for the character in “compare and summarize.”

Another copy reads “splendor” for “brightness”; this is incorrect.

“Thin gui” also means an extremely tiny amount, like what rests on the tip of a knife, and indicates that the dose is very small. Explaining “knife” as Metal and “gui” as two Earths may be ingenious, but it was not Wei Boyang’s original meaning.

Another copy reads “simple” for the character in “compare and summarize.”

Another copy reads “splendor” for “brightness”; this is incorrect.

Another copy reads “surging and thinning” for “eclipse and obscuration.”

显龙虎一本显作题 嘉黄芽一本嘉作加 中篇 偕以造化一本偕作须一本作始 元基一本作基一本作元模 六十卦用张布为舆一本用作周非是 不邪一本邪作陂 倾危国家一本作家国倾危 卦日一本日作月 六十卦用各自有日一本六十卦用作余六十卦非是在义设刑旧本在作立 日辰一本辰作夜 用心一本作逆贼一本作迸散 己口一本己作鼎 之来一本来作中 刚柔断矣不相涉入上篇以无制有下己释之 晦朔之间合符行中至始于作立 日辰一本辰作夜 用心一本作逆贼一本作迸散 己口一本己作鼎 之来一本来作中 刚柔断矣不相涉入上篇以无制有下己释之 晦朔之间合符行中至始于东北箕斗之乡盖晦朔之间乃是亥后子前日月于此而隐藏箕斗之乡乃是艮后寅前日月自此而旋起以比喻丹法之妙与天地日月同途也或者径以艮后寅前为晦朔之间为一阳生采药之候则相去远矣 旋而右转呕轮吐萌谓阳火自腰间旋斗历箕上至关则光耀透于帘帷之外也一本旋而作左旋
Interpretation

The Dragon and Tiger appear—symbols in alchemy for forces such as Yin-Yang and lead and mercury—and the Yellow Sprout gathers, the newly arising Jing and Qi in Neidan cultivation. The upper and lower sections join, taking Heaven and Earth’s creative transformations as their model.

The sixty hexagrams are arranged in sequence as the track for the process to follow. When the hexagram images are upright and balanced, they do not bring the state to collapse and turmoil. Each of the sixty hexagrams corresponds to a particular day and time; they must be used in order to accord with the seasonal sequence.

At the transition between the dark and new moons—the end and beginning of the lunar month—Yin and Yang Qi move according to their appointed markers. The cycle begins in the northeast, around the lunar lodges Ji and Dou. Here, “between the dark and new moons” refers to the interval after the Hai hour and before the Zi hour, when the sun and moon seem to vanish. “The region of Ji and Dou” refers to the area after the Gen position and before the Yin hour, where the sun and moon begin to turn. The scripture uses this imagery to describe the subtlety of Neidan cultivation and its correspondence with the movements of Heaven, Earth, the sun, and the moon. If “between the dark and new moons” is taken literally to mean the interval after the Gen position and before the Yin hour—that is, when the first Yang arises and the medicine is gathered—the timing would be far off.

Then Yang Qi turns to the right, like a revolving wheel, and sends forth a new sprout. This describes the Yang fire rising from the waist, passing through the lunar lodges Dou and Ji, and reaching the Mysterious Pass, the crucial aperture in Neidan cultivation. Its light then shines beyond the curtain. When the moon first appears in the west, its shape seems to turn to the right as well. The scripture uses the moon’s image to explain the rising and unfolding of Yang Qi.

毕之上震出为征盖谓月初生见于西方其象如右转呕轮吐萌谓阳火自腰间旋斗历箕上至关则光耀透于帘帷之外也一本旋而作左旋 毕之上震出为征盖谓月初生见于西方其象如震以喻身中火候也若以月出方位论先天八卦方位则先天之震不在西火候之震亦不在西既不识其落处徒见其说之相戾耳 和平一本和作初 其统一本其作阴 六五坤承谓六五三十日却非谓坤卦六五爻也阳数已讫讫则复起推情合性转而相与诸本皆在为道规矩之下惟朱子本在世为母之下非是 周流六爻一本流作章非是 难以一本以作可 滋章一本彰作亨 生光一本生作正非是 渐进一本渐作寖 成泰一本成作承 运而一本而作移 榆荚一本荚作叶非是 振索一本索作京 阳终于已中而相干谓四月属己律应中吕也霞山子詹谷注本中而作中吕一本中作午非是 午为防宾为一作主 遁世去位一本作遁去世位非是 其精一本其作真 阴中而作中吕一本中作午非是 午为防宾为一作主 遁世去位一本作遁去世位非是 其精一本其作真 阴伸阳屈毁伤姓名谓七月属申律应夷则也伸即申也伤即夷也旧本毁伤作没阳一本作没扬皆非是 消灭一本灭作息非是 至神一本至作其一本神作坤 衰盛一本衰作更非是 承御一本承作永 千秋一本秋作载 一无一本无作元非是 流布一本流作云
Interpretation

The character “bi” has “zhen” above it, from which the corresponding image is derived. This refers to the moon’s first appearance at the start of the month in the west. Its image resembles the Zhen trigram and serves as a metaphor for changes in the firing process within the body. If we determine the directions of the Earlier Heaven Bagua according to where the moon rises, the Earlier Heaven Zhen trigram is not in the west, nor is “Zhen” in the firing process of cultivation located in the west. Without understanding the specific position to which it refers, these statements may seem contradictory.

The textual variants in the different editions are as follows:

  • “He ping” (harmony): one edition reads “he chu” (harmony at the beginning).
  • “Qi tong”: one edition reads “qi yin.”
  • “Liu wu Kun cheng”: “Liu wu” refers to the thirtieth day of the month, not the sixth line, fifth place of the Kun trigram. The Yang numbers have reached their end, and after ending, they begin again. When one examines the underlying principle and brings nature and life together, the two thereby unite. All editions place this sentence under “the rules of the Dao”; only Zhu Xi’s edition places it under “the mother of the generations,” which is incorrect.
  • “Zhou liu liu yao” (circulating through the six lines): one edition reads “zhou zhang liu yao,” which is incorrect.
  • “Nan yi” (difficult to): one edition reads “nan ke.”
  • “Zi zhang” (growing more abundant): one edition reads “zi zhang,” written with a different character, which is incorrect.
  • “Sheng guang” (giving rise to light): one edition reads “zheng guang,” which is incorrect.
  • “Jian jin” (gradually advancing): one edition reads “qin jin.”
  • “Cheng Tai”: one edition reads “cheng Tai,” written with a different character.
  • “Yun er”: one edition reads “yun yi.”
  • “Yu jia” (elm pods): one edition reads “yu ye” (elm leaves), which is incorrect.
  • “Zhen suo”: one edition reads “zhen jing.”
  • “Yang zhong yu yi zhong er xiang gan”: this refers to the fourth month, which corresponds to the Earthly Branch Si, and to Zhonglü among the pitch standards—the twelve ancient tones associated with the twelve months. The edition annotated by Zhan Gu of Xiashanzi reads “Yang ends in Zhonglü and interacts”; another edition reads “Yang ends at Wu and interacts,” but “Wu” is incorrect.
  • “Wu wei bin” (Wu is the guest): one edition reads “Wu is the host.”
  • “Dun shi qu wei” (withdraw from the world and leave one’s position): one edition reads “withdraw and leave one’s worldly position.”
  • “Qi jing” (its essence): one edition reads “qi zhen” (its true nature).
  • “Yin zhong er zuo Zhonglü” (within Yin, Zhonglü arises): one edition writes “Wu” instead of “Zhonglü,” which is incorrect.
  • “Wu wei bin” (Wu is the guest): one edition reads “Wu is the host.”
  • “Dun shi qu wei” (withdraw from the world and leave one’s position): one edition reads “withdraw and leave one’s worldly position.”
  • “Qi jing” (its essence): one edition reads “qi zhen” (its true nature).
  • “Yin shen Yang qu hui shang xing ming”: this refers to the seventh month, which corresponds to the Earthly Branch Shen, and to Yize among the pitch standards. “Shen” is used as a loan character for “shen” meaning “to extend,” and “shang” for “yi.” Where the old edition reads “hui shang,” another has “mei Yang,” and a third “mei yang”; all are incorrect.
  • “Xiao mie” (vanishing): one edition reads “xiao xi” (news or changes).
  • “Zhi shen” (the utmost spirit): one edition reads “qi shen” (its spirit); another reads “zhi Kun.”
  • “Shuai sheng” (decline and flourishing): one edition reads “geng sheng” (flourishing anew).
  • “Cheng yu” (receiving and governing): one edition reads “yong yu” (governing eternally).
  • “Qian qiu” (a thousand autumns): one edition reads “qian zai” (a thousand years).
  • “Yi wu”: one edition reads “yi yuan,” which is incorrect.
  • “Liu bu” (spreading widely): one edition reads “yun bu” (spreading like clouds).
如鸡子至肉滑若饴旧本差在后盖疑其重韵而妄掇之也今移正之如一本作状相扶一本扶作符乃具一本具作俱若饴旧本饴作铅朱子本改正作饴 釿锷上篇已释之 恒为一本作筑固一本作筑完一本作筑垣 于斯之时情合乾坤一本作爰初之时由乎乾坤拘则水定水五行初一本作则水定火五行之初道无形象旧本无作之盖古者无字是此无字之与无草写则相似故误作之字由乎乾坤拘则水定水五行初一本作则水定火五行之初道无形象旧本无作之盖古者无字是此无字之与无草写则相似故误作之字也一本象作状 真一难图一本一作其 至悬一本作且非是 耳目口三宝一本作耳目己之宝非是 发扬一本扬作通 视览一本览作听 顺鸿蒙一本作顺以鸿 念念旧本作无念 证验自推移旧本作证难以推移非是 寖以一本作以浸 洞无极一本洞作润非是 谷中一本作中宫一本作容中皆非是 任杖一本作拄杖 没水一本没作投 获黍一本获作获 不见功一本不润非是 谷中一本作中宫一本作容中皆非是 任杖一本作拄杖 没水一本没作投 获黍一本获作获 不见功一本不作无 至约一本至作事非是盖草书至事之相似也
Interpretation

“Like an egg, with smooth, tender flesh, as if made of malt syrup.” In the old edition, this sentence was placed later, probably because the editors suspected that its rhyme repeated one in the preceding passage and mistakenly moved it. It is now restored to its proper place. Some editions write “form” for “like,” “tally” for “support,” and “all” for “complete.” The old edition reads “like lead” for “like malt syrup”; Zhu Xi’s edition corrects this to “like malt syrup.”

“Blade edge” has already been explained in the previous section.

Some editions read “built firm” for “always being”; others read “built complete” or “built a wall.”

“At this time, feeling and intention accord with Heaven and Earth.” Some editions read, “At the beginning, the source lies in Heaven and Earth.” Some editions read, “When held, Water settles; Water is the beginning of the Five Phases,” while others read, “When held, Water settles Fire; this is the beginning of the Five Phases.” In the phrase “the Dao has no form or image,” the old edition mistakenly writes “of” for “no.” The cursive form of the ancient character for “no” resembles the character for “of,” so the two are easily confused. Some editions write “form” for “image.”

Some editions write “it” for “one” in “the True One is hard to depict.”

Some editions write “mysterious” for “suspended” in “utterly suspended,” but that reading is incorrect.

Some editions read “the treasures of ears, eyes, and self” for “the three treasures of ears, eyes, and mouth”; this is incorrect.

Some editions write “communicate” for “raise” in “raise and spread.”

Some editions write “listen” for “survey” in “look and survey.”

Some editions read “follow by way of the vast expanse” for “follow the vast expanse.”

The old edition reads “no thought” for “thought after thought.”

The old edition reads “proof is difficult to move” for “verification shifts of its own accord”; this reading is incorrect.

Some editions write “by soaking” for “gradually.”

Some editions write “moisten” for “penetrate” in “penetrate the boundless.”

Some editions read “central palace” or “within the vessel” for “within the valley”; both are incorrect.

Some editions write “lean on a staff” for “hold a staff.”

Some editions write “cast into the water” for “sink into the water.”

Some editions write “gather millet” for “harvest millet.”

Some editions read “does not moisten” for “shows no result”; this is incorrect.

Some editions read “central palace” or “within the vessel” for “within the valley”; both are incorrect.

Some editions write “lean on a staff” for “hold a staff.”

Some editions write “cast into the water” for “sink into the water.”

Some editions write “gather millet” for “harvest millet.”

Some editions read “without merit” for “shows no result.”

Some editions read “the matter is brief” for “utterly concise”; this is incorrect. This may be because the cursive forms of “utterly” and “matter” are similar.

遂相衔咽咀嚼相吞旧本彭真一注及绍兴间刘永年本皆在慈母育养孝子报恩之下朱子谓今按二句自属下文俱相贪并之下四句相承语意连属不当在此愚按此章以母子之情为喻盖所谓遂相衔咽为慈乌反哺之义正当在此今依旧本移正之 三五为一即上篇子午数合三戊巳数称五是也盖与悟真篇三五一不同一本为作与非是 子当右转谓虎向水中生也午乃东旋谓龙从火里出也子午即水火也子当右转者金水合处盖从右转至于子也午乃东旋者木火为侣乃自东旋至于午也天道左旋右转还丹之道与天道一同若曰子从右转而加酉午从右转至于子也午乃东旋者木火为侣乃自东旋至于午也天道左旋右转还丹之道与天道一同若曰子从右转而加酉午从东旋而加卯则是右旋左转与天道背驰矣东旋一本东作左 主客一本客作定 贪并一本并作便一本作荣皆非是 各得其性一本得作有性作功 如审一本审作有 得成正道一本作得为成道 父主禀与一本主作生非是 牝鸡一本牝作肥 施化之道一本道作功一本作精非是 受气之初一本之作元 日改月化盖用庄子语一本作日受月化非是又疑日受月化碍理遂改为月受日化亦非是 水性周章一本水性作和融
Interpretation

Then they are like a loving mother nourishing her dutiful son, and the son repaying his mother’s kindness: they take up, swallow, chew, and ingest one another. The old edition, Pang Zhenyi’s Commentary, and Liu Yongnian’s edition from the Shaoxing era both place these two lines beneath “A loving mother nurtures; a dutiful son repays her kindness.” Zhu Xi argued that, judging by the meaning, the lines belong below, after “both greedily join together,” where the meaning flows continuously; they should not be placed here. I believe this chapter uses the bond between mother and child as a metaphor, and “then they take up and swallow one another” refers precisely to a crow feeding its parent. The lines therefore belong here. I have followed the old edition and moved them back to their original place.

“Three and five become one” refers to the numbers of Zi and Wu combining to make three, and those of Wu and Ji combining to make five, as described in the preceding section. This differs from “three, five, one” in the Wuzhen pian. One edition writes “and” in place of “become,” which is incorrect.

“Zi should turn to the right” means that the tiger emerges from water; “Wu then turns east” means that the dragon appears from fire. Zi and Wu represent Water and Fire. “Zi should turn to the right” means that Metal joins with Water and moves along the right until it reaches the Zi position. “Wu then turns east” means that Wood accompanies Fire, moving from the east to the Wu position. The Way of Heaven revolves to the left and turns to the right; the art of refining the Elixir follows the same pattern. If Zi were said to move from the right to the You position, and Wu from the east to the Mao position, the movement would turn right to left, contrary to the Way of Heaven. One edition writes “turns left” for “turns east.”

“Host and guest” appears in one edition as “fixed guest.”

“Greedily join together” appears in one edition as “greedily and conveniently,” and in another as “greedily seek glory.” Both are incorrect.

“Each attains its nature” appears in one edition with “has” in place of “attains,” and “function” in place of “nature.”

“Truly” appears in one edition with “there is” in place of “truly.”

“Attain and complete the Right Way” appears in one edition as “attain the way of completion.”

“The father presides over endowment” appears in one edition with “give birth” in place of “presides,” which is incorrect.

“Hen” appears in one edition with “fat” in place of “female.”

“The Way of transformation and nurture” appears in one edition with “function” in place of “Way,” and in another with “essence.” Both are incorrect.

“The beginning of receiving Qi” appears in one edition with “origin” in place of “of.”

“Daily change and monthly transformation” draws on the Zhuangzi. One edition reads “daily receiving and monthly transformation,” which is incorrect. Some also considered “daily receiving and monthly transformation” illogical and changed it to “monthly receiving and daily transformation.” That too is incorrect.

“The nature of Water is winding and circuitous” appears in one edition as “the nature of Water is harmonious and fluid.”

木火为侣谓龙从火里出东三南庄子语一本作日受月化非是又疑日受月化碍理遂改为月受日化亦非是 水性周章一本水性作和融 木火为侣谓龙从火里出东三南二同成五也金水合处谓虎向水中生北一西四共成之也张紫阳谓四象不离二体正是此意或用先天离次加于后天震兑以发明此说不惟失魏公本旨盖与身中造化大段相反一本金水作金木木火作水火谬之甚矣 列为一本列作合一本作引 心赤为女一本脱此四字 子五行始一本脱此四字一本子作居 建纬一本纬作位 虚危一本作抱真 执火一本作降坐 调合一本作执火 妄有所冀一本作冀有所望 以硇一本硇作□ 下篇 惟昔圣贤怀抱真至忧悯后生好道之伦 调合一本作执火 妄有所冀一本作冀有所望 以硇一本硇作□ 下篇 惟昔圣贤怀抱真至忧悯后生好道之伦随傍风采指画古文着为图籍开示后昆露见枝条隐藏本根盖谓古之圣贤既得此道以怀抱真复忧悯后生好道之士不得其说遂为之随傍风采援古证今着为图籍以开示之又不敢直直敷露于是托号五金八石而发明之也所谓着为图籍托号诸石乃指古之圣贤如此非谓后生好道之人如此也此章彭真一陈抱一皆体认错了惟朱子注独得其旨 三元一本元作光非是 精溢一本作津液非是
Interpretation

Wood and fire accompany one another: this means the Dragon is born from fire. “Three in the east and two in the south combine to make five” refers to Wood’s number, three, in the east and Fire’s number, two, in the south; together they make five. “The Dragon emerges from fire” uses the relationships among the Five Phases to explain how the Dragon corresponds with Wood and Fire. The Zhuangzi says that “the sun receives transformation from the moon,” but this does not make sense. Some suspect the text was later changed to “the moon receives transformation from the sun,” but that is also incorrect.

Water’s nature is to flow in all directions without settling. Another edition reads, “Water’s nature is harmonious and fluid.”

Wood and fire accompany one another, meaning that the Dragon is born from fire: the east corresponds to Wood, whose number is three; the south corresponds to Fire, whose number is two; together they make five. Metal and water combine, meaning that the Tiger is born in water: the west corresponds to Metal, whose number is four; the north corresponds to Water, whose number is one; together they also make five. Zhang Ziyang said, “The Four Symbols are never separate from the two bodies”; this is precisely what he meant. Some explain this by pairing the Li trigram from the Earlier Heaven Bagua with the Zhen and Dui trigrams from the Later Heaven Bagua. This not only departs from Wei Boyang’s original meaning but also runs sharply counter to the changes of Yin and Yang within the human body. Another edition reads “Metal and Wood” for “Metal and Water,” and “Water and Fire” for “Wood and Fire.” These are serious errors.

One edition reads “combine” for “arrange”; another reads “draw forth.”

The four characters “the heart’s redness makes the female” are missing from one edition.

The four characters “the child is the beginning of the Five Phases” are missing from one edition; another edition has “reside” in place of “child.”

One edition reads “establish position” for “establish the warp.”

One edition reads “embrace the true” for “Xu and Wei.”

One edition reads “descend and sit” for “grasp fire.”

One edition reads “grasp fire” for “harmonize and combine.”

One edition reads “hope for something in vain” for “recklessly harbor hopes.”

In “using nao,” one edition has a missing character in place of “nao.”

The second part:

The sages of old embraced the mysterious Dao and the truth. They deeply pitied those in later generations who loved to seek the Dao. Following the signs of things and referring to ancient texts, they explained the principles and compiled books of diagrams and writing to pass on to posterity. They revealed the branches while concealing the root.

This means that the sages of old had already attained the Dao and embraced its mystery and truth. They were also concerned that seekers in later generations might fail to grasp its essential points. So they used the signs of things and cited ancient precedents to explain the principles, compiling books to pass on to posterity. They did not dare to explain everything directly and fully; instead, they used the “five metals and eight minerals”—names for metals and minerals commonly found in alchemical texts—to convey their meaning. The references to compiling books and using mineral names describe what the sages of old did, not what later seekers did. In this chapter, Peng Zhenyi and Chen Baoyi both misunderstood the passage; only Zhu Xi’s commentary grasped its original meaning.

One edition reads “three lights” for “three origins,” but this is incorrect.

One edition reads “bodily fluids” for “essence overflow,” but this is incorrect.

化形一本化作变 覆谬众文谓反覆谬乱其文而不敢径直漏泄也一本谬作冒非是 传世一本传作举 不仕一本仕作遂 故为乱辞一本为作非非是 沟一本沟作远 退自后旧本后作改非是 关楗有低昂兮周天遂奔走周天两字旧本皆作周朱子疑周无义理遂改为害炁亦非是害字与周字盖相似字与天字颇相近也 江后旧本后作改非是 关楗有低昂兮周天遂奔走周天两字旧本皆作周朱子疑周无义理遂改为害炁亦非是害字与周字盖相似字与天字颇相近也 江河无枯竭兮水流注于海旧本无作之非是之无之误中篇道无形象下已详释之一本河作淮 终复始一本作复终始一本作复更始 张于一本于作设 白虎一本虎作矾非是 苍龙一本龙作液非是 压止一本止作之 龙鳞甲鬣一本龙作鱼甲作狎非是 接连一本作杂沓 自相守一本自作而 房六一本六作七非是 正阳一本阳作阴非是
Interpretation

All forms arise through transformation from the same source, their root.

“Repeatedly garbling the text” means deliberately altering and disarranging the wording, without daring to reveal the contents directly. Another copy writes “expose” instead of “garble,” which is incorrect.

In another transmitted copy, “transmit” is written as “raise.”

In another copy, “serve” is written as “follow.”

Thus the wording is deliberately made confused and hard to understand. Another copy writes “not” instead of “make,” which is incorrect.

In the phrase “Dark Ravine,” another copy writes “distant” instead of “ravine.”

In “withdraw from behind,” an old edition writes “change” instead of “behind,” which is incorrect.

“The pivotal mechanism has its rises and falls, and so the circuit of Heaven proceeds in motion.” The old editions both write “circuit of Heaven” as “circuit of mound.” Zhu Xi suspected that “circuit of mound” made no sense, so he changed it to “harm Qi,” but that correction is also wrong. The graph for “harm” may have been confused with the similar-looking graph for “circuit,” while the graph for “mound” looks rather like the one for “Heaven.”

In “river behind,” an old edition writes “change” instead of “behind,” which is incorrect.

“The pivotal mechanism has its rises and falls, and the circuit of Heaven proceeds in motion.” The old editions write “circuit of Heaven” as “circuit of mound.” Zhu Xi suspected the phrase made no sense and changed it to “harm Qi,” but that correction is also wrong. “Harm” and “circuit” have similar-looking graphs, as do “mound” and “Heaven.”

Rivers do not run dry; their waters flow into the sea. An old edition writes “of” instead of “without,” which is incorrect. Here “without” means “not having” or “will not”; it cannot be written as “of.” This is explained in detail in the middle section, “The Dao Has No Form or Image.” Another copy writes “Huai River” instead of “river.”

“Ends and begins again” means that when one cycle ends, it begins anew. Another copy reads “begins and ends again,” while yet another reads “begins anew.”

In the phrase “spread in,” another copy writes “establish” instead of “in.”

In “White Tiger,” a symbolic term in alchemy, another copy writes “alum” instead of “tiger,” which is incorrect.

In “Azure Dragon,” a symbolic term in alchemy, another copy writes “liquid” instead of “dragon,” which is incorrect.

In “press down and stop,” another copy writes “of” instead of “stop.”

“Dragon scales, plates, and mane” refers to the dragon’s scales, armor-like plates, and mane. Another copy writes “fish” instead of “dragon,” and “to imitate” instead of “plates”; both are incorrect.

Another copy writes “mixed and jumbled” instead of “connected in succession.”

In “guard one another by themselves,” another copy writes “and” instead of “by themselves.”

In “Chamber Six,” another copy writes “Seven” instead of “Six,” which is incorrect.

In “Correct Yang,” another copy writes “Yin” instead of “Yang,” which is incorrect.

“Three and five stand together, returning as one”: the three and five stand together and converge in one place. The graph meaning “to imitate” is incorrect.

Another copy writes “mixed and jumbled” instead of “connected in succession.”

In “guard one another by themselves,” another copy writes “and” instead of “by themselves.”

In “Chamber Six,” another copy writes “Seven” instead of “Six,” which is incorrect.

In “Correct Yang,” another copy writes “Yin” instead of “Yang,” which is incorrect.

三五并危一兮都集归一狎非是 接连一本作杂沓 自相守一本自作而 房六一本六作七非是 正阳一本阳作阴非是 三五并危一兮都集归一所盖谓房六七张二三方之气并北方危一都会集而归于一处也中间极有造化盖南北张危月也东西房昴日也危一合房六则为水之生成数张二合七则为火之生成数房六在东张二在南木火为侣六与二合而成八昴七在西危一在北金水合处七与一合而成八应二八一斤之数所谓本之但二物者此也一本并危一作并为一又一本作之与一皆非是一本一所作二所亦非是当知魏公之作是书无一语不合造化若以为三五之与一兮都集归二所则造化何有哉又况二所之说尤其大谬纵使果谓之二所则当言分不当言集既谓之集则当言一所不当言二所也 取甫詹霞山注本作甫取 纵使果谓之二所则当言分不当言集既谓之集则当言一所不当言二所也 取甫詹霞山注本作甫取 赤色通表里一本作赤黑达表里 黍米一本黍作稻非是 若山泽气烝兮一本作山泽气相烝兮非是 亿世一本世作代 而可考一本而作自 心灵一本心作防 忽自悟一本忽作乍 受图箓一本作录天图非是 鼎器歌 径一分旧本径作十 长尺二一本尺二作二尺非是
Interpretation

“Three and five, two and eight, together with one, all converge in the same place.” This refers to the lunar mansion Fang, one of the eastern mansions, corresponding to six; Zhang, one of the southern mansions, corresponding to two; Shen corresponding to seven; and Wei corresponding to one. The Qi of these directions converges and returns to a single place. This contains the principle behind the transformations of creation: Zhang in the south and Wei in the north belong to the Moon; Fang in the east and Mao belong to the Sun. The one of Wei combines with the six of Fang to form the generating number of Water; the two of Zhang combines with the seven of Shen to form the generating number of Fire. Fang’s six lies in the east, and Zhang’s two in the south: Wood and Fire are matched, and six combined with two makes eight. Mao’s seven lies in the west, and Wei’s one in the north: Metal and Water combine, and seven combined with one also makes eight. These correspond to the numbers “two and eight, one jin.” The claim that there are fundamentally only two things refers to this.

Some editions read “together with Wei, one” as “together they become one,” while others read “with one”; both are incorrect. The reading “one place” should not be changed to “two places” either. One should understand that every sentence in Wei Boyang’s book accords with the principles of creation and transformation. If the original meaning were that “three and five, together with one, all converge in two places,” where would the principles of creation and transformation be? Moreover, the reading “two places” is especially mistaken: even if they truly returned to two places, one should say “divide,” not “converge.” Since the text says “converge,” it must mean returning to one place, not two.

At this passage, “take fu” is written as “fu take” in the commentary edition by Zhan Xiashan.

Even if they truly returned to two places, one should say “divide,” not “converge.” Since the text says “converge,” it must mean returning to one place, not two.

At this passage, “fu take” is written as “take fu” in the commentary edition by Zhan Xiashan.

“Red color reaches inside and out”: some editions read “red and black reach inside and out.”

“Millet”: some editions write “rice” instead of “millet,” which is incorrect.

“If the vapors of mountains and marshes steam forth”: some editions read “the vapors of mountains and marshes steam together,” which is incorrect.

“Ten thousand generations”: some editions write “ages” instead of “generations.”

“And may be examined”: some editions write “from” instead of “and.”

“Mind and spirit”: some editions write “defense” instead of “mind.”

“Suddenly awakens to understanding”: some editions write “suddenly” as “abruptly.”

“Receives the charts and registers”: some editions read “records the celestial chart,” which is incorrect.

Song of the Crucible and Vessel

“Diameter of one fen”: older editions write “ten” instead of “diameter.”

“Length of one chi and two cun”: some editions read “two chi,” which is incorrect.

腹齐正朱子云按齐即古脐字一本作腹五齐非是首尾武中间文盖谓晦朔为首尾月望为中间也首尾即是一处中间亦即是一处若言巳为阳子尾午为阴亥首巳午两向为中间则是两个首尾两个中间矣一说以进阳火则子丑寅为首辰巳为尾退阴符则午未申为首戌亥为尾中宫为中间则是两首两尾一中间其说皆未稳 两七聚一本聚作窍非是 赡理脑一本赡作瞻一本作胆皆非是 序 三相谓大易黄老炉火三者之阴阳造化互相七聚一本聚作窍非是 赡理脑一本赡作瞻一本作胆皆非是 序 三相谓大易黄老炉火三者之阴阳造化互相似也自彭真一以木三火二土五金四水一画为五位相得而各有合之图故后人皆祖彭氏此说竟以为魏公本文而并作五行之相说了沿袭至今无有辩之者皆不思魏公所言相者果为何事况易所谓五位相得而各有合盖合五行之生成数今彭氏止用生数乌得谓之五位相得而各有合或以为木三火二为一五金四水一为一五与中央土五共成三五则犹可谓之三五相今言五行之相则水自一数火自二数金木土之数各各不同安取其为相哉一本作互相似亦可取终不若三相之说为甚明也盖详其下文有曰三道由一俱出径路又曰罗列三条枝茎相连同出异名皆由一门其为三相居然可见矣
Interpretation

The abdomen and navel should be aligned. Zhu Xi says, “‘Qi’ is the character for ‘navel’ used in ancient texts. One edition reads ‘abdomen five,’ which is wrong.” The beginning and end belong to the martial aspect, while the middle belongs to the civil aspect. Here, the dark and new moons are the beginning and end, and the full moon is the middle. The beginning and end are in fact at the same place, as is the middle. If one says that Si is the tail of the Yang Fire cycle and Wu is the head of the Yin Tally cycle, with the middle lying between Si and Wu, this would produce two beginnings and ends and two middles. Another interpretation holds that, in advancing the Yang Fire, Zi, Chou, and Yin mark the beginning, while Chen and Si mark the end; in withdrawing the Yin Tally, Wu, Wei, and Shen mark the beginning, while Xu and Hai mark the end, with the central palace as the middle. This gives two beginnings and two ends, but only one middle. Neither interpretation is satisfactory.

At the phrase “the two sevens gather,” another edition reads “the two seven apertures,” which is wrong.

At the phrase “nourish and regulate the brain,” other editions read “gaze at and regulate the brain” or “the gallbladder regulates the brain.” Both are wrong.

Preface

“Three Things in Resemblance” means that the Great Changes (the Zhouyi), the teachings of Huang-Lao (Daoist thought represented by the Yellow Emperor and Laozi), and the furnace fire (alchemy) resemble one another in their principles of Yin-Yang change and creation. After Peng Zhenyi drew a diagram assigning Wood three, Fire two, Earth five, Metal four, and Water one to the five positions, showing how they correspond and each find their proper match, later writers adopted Peng’s explanation. They even treated it as Wei Boyang’s original text, changing the title to “The Five Phases in Resemblance.” This has been passed down to the present without anyone pointing out the problem.

People have not carefully considered what Wei Boyang meant by “in resemblance.” Moreover, the Changes’ statement that “the five positions correspond and each has its match” should refer to the matching of the numbers by which the Five Phases arise. Peng’s diagram uses only the generating numbers, so how can it be said to accord with “the five positions correspond and each has its match”? If the explanation is that Wood three and Fire two make a group of five, Metal four and Water one make another group of five, and central Earth five completes “three fives,” then perhaps it could be called “the three things in resemblance.” But if this is called “the Five Phases in resemblance,” Water has the number one, Fire the number two, and Metal, Wood, and Earth each have different numbers. How, then, can they be said to resemble one another?

One edition reads “resemble one another,” which seems to make sense, but it is ultimately less clear than “three things in resemblance.” A close look at what follows shows that the text says, “The three Ways all emerge from one, taking a single path,” and also, “Set out in three lines, their branches and stems linked; they emerge together under different names, all through one gate.” Clearly, it is the three things that resemble one another; the meaning is unmistakable.

郐国鄙夫魏公自谓也魏公乃防稽上虞人今不曰会稽而曰郐国皆由一门其为三相居然可见矣 郐国鄙夫魏公自谓也魏公乃防稽上虞人今不曰会稽而曰郐国者不欲显言其本贯也若直谓之会稽则是后人改之之辞非魏公本文也 挟怀朴素一本作怀朴抱素 不乐权荣谓不肯爱乐权势荣耀也乐字当作去声一本权作欢非是 利名一本利作令 宴然闲居一本作远客燕闲 察其所趣一本所作旨 共伦一本伦作论 施化一本施作神 归根一本根作愚非是 我心一本心作形 八石一本八作五 成物一本物作功 委时去害依托丘山循游寥廓与为邻至各相乘负安稳长生十六句乃是括魏伯阳三字各相乘负者如委相乘负为魏人白相乘负为伯阝阳相乘负委时去害依托丘山循游寥廓与为邻至各相乘负安稳长生十六句乃是括魏伯阳三字各相乘负者如委相乘负为魏人白相乘负为伯阝阳相乘负为阳是也一本作仙阨作厄各相乘负安稳长生作吉人相乘安长生又一本作吉人相乘负安稳可长生皆非是又一本东西南倾作东西南北水旱隔并作水旱兵革 赞序 立政一本作御极 米盐盖用史记天官书语米盐分判犹言黑白分明也一本米盐作坎离非是 以易一本易作经 立注一本注作法非是 为此一本此作吾
Interpretation

“Wei, the humble man of Kuai” is how Duke Wei refers to himself. Duke Wei is Wei Boyang of the Eastern Han dynasty, whose ancestral home was Shangyu in Kuaiji. The text says “Kuai” rather than “Kuaiji” to avoid stating his native place directly. If it were written “Kuaiji,” that wording would have been altered by later hands and would not be Wei’s original text. The references to Kuai and to a humble man also reflect his modest way of speaking about himself.

“Embracing simplicity and purity” means keeping a plain and unspoiled heart. Some versions read “holding simplicity and embracing purity.”

“Not delighting in power and glory” means not coveting power or renown. Here, “delight” is read with a falling tone and means to like or covet. Some versions have “joy” instead of “power”; that is incorrect.

In “profit and fame,” some versions have “command” instead of “profit.”

“Dwelling peacefully at leisure” appears in some versions as “the distant guest rests at ease.”

In “examining what they pursue,” some versions have “aim” instead of “what.”

In “shared discourse,” some versions have “discussion” instead of “discourse.”

In “bringing transformation,” some versions have “spirit” instead of “bringing.”

In “returning to the root,” some versions have “foolishness” instead of “root”; that is incorrect.

In “my heart,” some versions have “form” instead of “heart.”

In “the eight minerals,” some versions have “five” instead of “eight.”

In “bringing things to completion,” some versions have “achievement” instead of “things.”

These sixteen lines—“Leaving the harm behind when the time comes, / Relying on hills and mountains, / Roaming through the vast expanse, / Keeping company with ghosts, / Until each bears and carries the other, / Secure and long-lived”—are an encoded summary of the three characters in “Wei Boyang.” “Each bears and carries the other” interprets the characters by breaking apart and recombining their written forms: “Leaving the harm behind when the time comes” and “Relying on hills and mountains” correspond to “Wei”; “Roaming through the vast expanse” and “Keeping company with ghosts” correspond to “Bo”; and “Until each bears and carries the other” and “Secure and long-lived” correspond to “Yang.” In some related versions, “ghost” is written as “immortal,” and “danger” as “calamity.” Other versions read “A worthy person bears one another; at peace, one lives long” or “A worthy person bears one another, secure and steady, and may live long”; both are incorrect. Another version changes “East, west, and south incline” to “East, west, south, and north,” and “drought and flood are interspersed” to “drought and flood, war and upheaval.”

In the “Preface of Praise,” some versions read “ruling the state” where the text has “establishing government.”

The term “rice and salt” comes from the “Treatise on the Celestial Offices” in the Records of the Grand Historian. It means distinguishing and clarifying, like making black and white distinct. Some versions read “Kan and Li”; that is incorrect.

In “by means of the Changes,” some versions have “classic” instead of “Changes.”

In “establishing the commentary,” some versions have “method” instead of “commentary”; that is incorrect.

In “doing this,” some versions have “I” instead of “this.”

防同契发挥三篇版既成冲虚子张本真命工以释疑二十页并刻之俾读者有所考焉冲虚可谓好道之立注一本注作法非是 为此一本此作吾 防同契发挥三篇版既成冲虚子张本真命工以释疑二十页并刻之俾读者有所考焉冲虚可谓好道之笃见义之勇也 周易参同契发
Interpretation

The printed edition of the three chapters of An Elucidation of the Zhouyi Cantongqi has now been completed. Chongxu Zi Zhang Benzhen commissioned craftsmen to carve twenty pages of Explaining Doubts, which were printed together with it, giving readers grounds on which to consult and examine the text. Chongxu Zi truly may be called one who steadfastly believes in the Great Dao and has the courage to act whenever he sees what is right.

Explaining Doubts about An Elucidation of the Zhouyi Cantongqi

挥释疑

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 3