中文 · EN

《天乐集》Vol. 11

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書 Vol. 11 / 11 9,699 characters

About this page. The original text of 《天乐集》 Vol. 11 (Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書, 11 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 23 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《天乐集》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

·傅金铨所撰辑《济一子证道秘书十七种》,简称《道书十七种》。内收有《玄微心印》及《三丰丹诀》等,均是人元阴阳法派之专着。是故,既问《道书十七种》是正是邪,即是云阴阳丹法正邪耳。海印子答曰:“曾游龙藏,自然到眼立分”。自然有很清楚的认识,是正是邪,却未明断,当自有不言之隐衷。从其措辞看,并未力断是邪,尤引“五庄观”、“人参果”云云,启人慧目,耐人寻味也。——盛克琦识) 附录二、 答是邪,尤引“五庄观”、“人参果”云云,启人慧目,耐人寻味也。——盛克琦识) 附录二、 答友人书五通 海印山人 一 通 清王梦楼一生学佛,至八十以后又学仙,与仙人往来都有诗。来函谓“何为老而趋下”等语,是义不然。学道在解决老病死三种苦难。年至八十,亦已老矣,精神不济,步履维艰,饮食不畅。耳目失其聪明,发白面皱,去死不远矣。当此之时,若有人能解其现前痛苦者,心乐而从之。此人情之常也。 梦楼于禅,颇有契心。其与仙人往来,必仙人传其延年却病之术,调息能解其现前痛苦者,心乐而从之。此人情之常也。
Interpretation

On the Seventeen Works of the Dao

Fu Jinquan’s Seventeen Secret Works on Attaining the Dao by the Master Jiyi, abbreviated as the Seventeen Works of the Dao, includes texts such as The Heart Seal of Subtle Mystery and Zhang Sanfeng’s Alchemical Instructions. All are devoted to the human-origin yin-yang school (a line of internal alchemy that takes male–female dual cultivation and the union of Kan and Li as its core). So asking whether the Seventeen Works of the Dao are orthodox or heterodox is really asking whether yin-yang alchemical methods are orthodox or heterodox. Haiyinzi answered: “Having roamed the Dragon Treasury, as soon as a text meets the eye one can tell at once”—meaning he had read widely in the Buddhist canon (the Daizang); when a scripture appeared before him he could naturally distinguish, and he had a clear sense of right and wrong, yet he did not state a verdict plainly, which likely reflects constraints on what he could say openly. From his wording he also did not flatly declare the works heterodox; he especially mentions “Five-Village Abbey” and “ginseng fruit” and the like, intending to open the reader’s discerning eye—worth pondering carefully. —Noted by Sheng Keqi


Appendix II: Letters in Reply to a Friend (Five Letters)

Haiyin Shanren

First Letter

In the Qing, Wang Menglou studied Buddhism all his life; after eighty he also pursued immortality cultivation, and his exchanges with visiting “immortals” are attested in his poetry. Your letter says things like “why did he slide downhill only in old age”—that view is mistaken. Learning the Dao is precisely to cope with the three sufferings of old age, sickness, and death. At eighty one is already old: spirit flags, walking is hard, eating and drinking go wrong, ears and eyes fail, hair turns white and the face wrinkles—death is not far. If someone can relieve the pain before one’s eyes, the heart gladly follows; that is human nature.

Menglou had genuine insight in Chan. His dealings with immortals were mostly immortals passing him methods to extend life and dispel illness; breath regulation could ease present suffering, and he was glad to follow—again human nature.

梦楼于禅,颇有契心。其与仙人往来,必仙人传其延年却病之术,调息安神之法,得真实受用、解其老病之烦闷耳。佛法固高,然谈理者多,实证者尚无其人。若谓老病之苦不能解除,而能解决死苦;现生尚不能证圣,死后反能证圣,皆属自欺欺人。玄宗只贵现前一着,现前能安神和息,得真实受用,将来可不问自知。是故玄宗如商人办货,要现款现购,不用期票,不贵赊账。今之学佛者,求将来获益,死后往生,类皆使用期票。然期票到期,能否兑现,实无把握。谚所谓“现钱不要,要赊账”,正契今日一般学佛人之心理也。 君岂未读最早流入中国而译出之《四十二章经》乎?佛问人命在几间,诸弟子答者,皆不契佛意。最后一人答,正契今日一般学佛人之心理也。 君岂未读最早流入中国而译出之《四十二章经》乎?佛问人命在几间,诸弟子答者,皆不契佛意。最后一人答曰:“在呼吸间”。佛方赞叹,称为知道。是意云何?呼吸于道,有甚相关?须知呼吸所在,即道之所在也。既人命在呼吸间,则何不于呼吸未断之前,安神调息,而免其破产乎?若待呼吸一断,则现款已用罄。纵有期票,试问至何处兑现乎?奈何忍心待其破产,斯亦惑矣。 二 通
Interpretation

Meng Lou had considerable insight in Chan practice. In his exchanges with immortals, what they mostly taught were methods for extending life, dispelling illness, and regulating the breath to settle the spirit—bringing him real, tangible benefits and easing the distress of chronic illness. Buddhism is certainly profound, but much of it is discourse; few can verify it in the present moment. To claim one cannot even resolve the suffering of old age and sickness yet can be liberated from the suffering of death; to say one cannot attain sainthood in this life yet can do so after death—in his view, such claims are self-deception.

Daoist cultivation cares only about “this move right before you”: if you can settle the spirit and regulate the breath now and gain genuine benefit, there is no need to ask what will happen later—you will know naturally. Learning the Way is like a merchant buying goods: pay cash on delivery; no promissory notes, no credit. Many who study Buddhism today seek future benefit or rebirth after death—they are all using promissory notes. Whether those notes can be honored when they come due is uncertain. The proverb “won’t take cash, insists on credit” fits the mindset of many Buddhists today.

Have you not read the Sutra in Forty-two Sections, among the earliest Buddhist texts translated into China? The Buddha asked, “In how many intervals does human life lie?” The disciples answered in turn; none satisfied him. The last answer alone matched what most Buddhists today actually think.

Have you not read the Sutra in Forty-two Sections, among the earliest Buddhist texts translated into China? The Buddha asked, “In how many intervals does human life lie?” The disciples answered in turn; none satisfied him. The last one said, “In the space between breaths.” Only then did the Buddha praise him, saying he “knows.” What does this mean? What has breath to do with the Way? Know this: where breath is, there the Way is. Since human life lies between breaths, why not settle the spirit and regulate the breath before breath is cut off, so you do not “go bankrupt”? Once breath stops, your cash is spent. Even if you hold promissory notes, where will you cash them? How can you bear to wait until bankruptcy—that is sheer folly.

来示谓“人命在呼吸间,只喻其速,入息不已用罄。纵有期票,试问至何处兑现乎?奈何忍心待其破产,斯亦惑矣。 二 通 来示谓“人命在呼吸间,只喻其速,入息不保出息”云云。我兄仅解得一半。若只言其速,世尊当云:“善哉!子知时矣”,不当云:“善哉!子知道矣”。可知并非为时间问题也。道在呼吸之间,即教人“调息安神”之意。盖息者,心之风相也。息调则心定,息和则心和。凡人动怒之际,心暴则息亦粗。赛跑之顷,心跳加速,则呼吸亦短促。死人无息,心离故也。在定之心亦无息,心寂故也。
Interpretation

One

Your letter says: “Human life is between breaths—only a metaphor for how brief it is: if inhalation never stops and exhalation is used up, life is spent. Even if one holds a paper ‘term note’ (a metaphor for the voucher of lifespan), where is it to be cashed when due? How can one bear to sit and wait for ‘bankruptcy’ (death)? That is too muddled.”

Two

Your letter also says: “Human life is between breaths—only a metaphor for how fast it is: inhaling does not guarantee there will be exhaling,” and so on. My friend, you have grasped only half. If it were merely about “fast” and “short,” the World-Honored One (the Buddha) would have said “Excellent! You know the time,” not “Excellent! You know it.” From this we see the point is not really about time.

“The Dao is in the interval of breath” truly teaches regulating the breath to settle the spirit. Breath is the wind-aspect of thought; when breath is regulated, the mind is stable; when breath is harmonious, the heart is at peace. When ordinary people flare up in anger, the mind is agitated and breathing is rough; when running a race the heart races and breathing is short. The dead have no breath because the heart (Shen) has left; one in deep samadhi also has no breath because the heart is utterly still.

是故从有息而调至无息,外息绝无出入,则心亦无起灭。心无起灭,息无出入,则大定之象,道之所寄也。不观禅宗二十七祖般若多罗尊者答东印度国,则心亦无起灭。心无起灭,息无出入,则大定之象,道之所寄也。不观禅宗二十七祖般若多罗尊者答东印度国王之语乎?曰:“贫道出息不随万缘,入息不居蕴界,常转如是经百千万亿卷,非但一卷两卷”。般若尊者以调出入息为转经,乃转自身之经,非转他人之经。神息冲和,绵绵若存,内景净寂,外景虚融,非“出息不随万缘,入息不居蕴界”之谓乎?老子所谓“专气致柔,载营魄抱一”之功夫也。转他人之经,功德固大;转自己真息之经,功德尤大。转有字真经,功德固超;转无字真经,功德尤超。世人舍近而求远,好高而不务实,一口呼吸尚管不住,遑论其他乎? 今世学佛者千万,《四十二章经》皆弃而不学,意为浅近,所谓“人命在呼吸间”之旨,茫然无知,妄想即身成佛,而成佛之资本,却丝毫经》皆弃而不学,意为浅近,所谓“人命在呼吸间”之旨,茫然无知,妄想即身成佛,而成佛之资本,却丝毫无有,是无异于贫无一文之士,而思做永安先施之老板,岂不可笑!(永安先施是解放前特大游乐公司也。)
Interpretation

Therefore, cultivation should be tuned all the way from “still able to feel the breath” to “no longer feeling either the in-breath or the out-breath”: outwardly it seems there is no inhaling or exhaling at all, and inwardly the mind no longer rises or falls with arising and ceasing thoughts. When the mind does not rise and fall and the breath has no coming or going, that is the state of great samadhi (dading)—also the place where the Dao rests.

There is no need to seek far away. Consider how the twenty-seventh patriarch of Chan, Venerable Prajñādhara, answered the king of East India. The venerable said: “When this poor monk exhales, he is not pulled by the ten thousand conditions; when he inhales, he does not stick in the five skandhas and six entrances. In this way he constantly turns the sutra—hundreds of thousands of millions of scrolls, not merely one or two.” He took regulating the in-breath and out-breath as “turning the sutra”: turning the sutra that is on one’s own body, not the sutra written by someone else. When spirit and qi harmonize with the breath, fine and continuous as if always present, the inner landscape is pure and still and the outer scene is empty and blended—is this not exactly “on the out-breath, not following the ten thousand conditions; on the in-breath, not dwelling in the realm of the skandhas”? It is also the kind of practice Lao Zi described as “concentrating qi to achieve softness, carrying and embracing the soul in oneness.”

Turning another person’s sutra certainly brings great merit; turning the sutra of one’s own true breath brings even greater merit. Turning a sutra with written words already ranks very high; turning a sutra without written words ranks higher still. Yet people often abandon what is near to chase what is far, reaching high while neglecting the ground—they cannot even manage a single breath, and still talk of everything else.

Today those who study Buddhism number in the tens of millions, yet they set aside the Sutra in Forty-two Sections and do not study it, finding it too plain and close at hand. They are also blank about the meaning of “human life lies between one breath and the next,” while dreaming of becoming a Buddha in this very body—yet they have not a penny of the capital for Buddhahood. It is like someone without a single coin wanting to be the boss of the pre-liberation mega amusement firms Yong’an and Sincere—how is that not laughable?

《四十二章经》者,学佛之初步阶梯也。于呼吸之间安立道场,尤为《四十二章经》之肯綮也。玄宗《黄庭经》云:“后有密户前生门,出日入月呼吸存”。陈虚白曰:“息往息来无间断,圣胎成就合元初”。许旌阳曰:“内交真气存呼吸,自然造化返童颜”。李道纯云:“阖辟应乾坤,斯为玄牝门;自从无出入,三界独称尊”。又云:“谛观三教圣人书,息之一字最简易;若于息上做工功夫,为佛为仙不费力”。郑和阳云:“人生有心必有息,心息相依拆不得;逆却息即妨了心,反令心息自相贼;心息相贼,为佛为仙不费力”。郑和阳云:“人生有心必有息,心息相依拆不得;逆却息即妨了心,反令心息自相贼;心息相贼六魔攻,天魂被驱入鬼国。鞠君子,息是自心万善柢。息顺心泰百体舒,大光明藏安如砥。圆活不容纤翳粘,性命纯纯与天比。释迦微言非言他,老君道德皆德此。颜子箪瓢乐自在,的见息存不敢懈。纵说万典与千经,只在心息定境界”。试观末一句,及“息顺心泰百体舒”句,即知《四十二章经》道在呼吸间之意,于一呼吸之间,安立道场之妙修矣。《唯识论》虽好,救不了白发与胃病,不如回风混合,唯息之简妙矣。然否,可审思之! 三 通
Interpretation

Plain-Language Reading of Record of Heavenly Joy

The Sutra in Forty-Two Sections is the first rung on the ladder of learning Buddhism; yet establishing the practice hall within a single breath in and out is even more the heart of that sutra.

The Yellow Court Classic as transmitted in the Tang says: “Behind there is the hidden gate, before the gate of birth; as sun goes out and moon comes in, store [essence] through breathing”—in the passes front and back in the body that correspond to sun and moon, one keeps qi through breath. Chen Xubai said: exhaling and inhaling without break, when the sacred embryo is complete one merges with the primordial beginning. Xu Jingyang (Xu Xun) said: when true qi within the body meets breathing, natural creation can turn old age back to youth. Li Daochun said: one closing and one opening answer to Qian and Kun—this is the gate of the Mysterious Female (Xuanpin); once there is no longer going out and coming in, one alone is honored in the three realms. He also said: read carefully the books of the sages of the three teachings—the character for “breath/rest” (xi) is simplest; if one works on breathing, becoming Buddha or immortal takes no wasted effort.

Zheng Heyang said: human life with a heart must have heart-and-breath; heart and breath rely on each other and cannot be split; if one goes against natural breathing, one instead harms the heart and makes heart and breath harm each other; when heart and breath rob each other, the six demons attack and the heavenly soul is driven into the ghost realm. Ju Junzi—breath is the root of ten thousand goods in one’s own heart. When breath is smooth the heart is at peace and the hundred parts are easeful; the great treasury of light rests steady as a whetstone; round and alive, not a hair’s shadow sticks; nature and life pure and whole can compare with Heaven. Shakyamuni’s subtle words are not about something else; what Old Master Laozi discusses in the Dao De Jing is also here. Yan Hui with a single bamboo basket and gourd cup found joy—truly seeing breath preserved and not daring to slacken. Even if one expounds ten thousand canons and a thousand scriptures, it is only the realm fixed by heart and breath.

Look at the closing line and “when breath is smooth the heart is at peace and the hundred parts are easeful,” and you will see the meaning of The Sutra in Forty-Two Sections that “the Dao is in the space between breaths,” and the subtle practice of establishing the hall within one breath. The Treatise on Consciousness-Only is fine, but it cannot cure white hair and stomach illness—better to turn the wind and blend it back: only the simplicity and wonder of “breath/rest.” Whether this is so, you may examine closely.

来示谓不再谈小乘之《四十二章经》,而谈大乘之《楞严》、《华严》。弟就谈《楞严》、《华严》。君岂不见“楞严二十五圣圆通”,有两位从调出入息而证漏尽,得阿罗汉乎?其一为周《楞严》、《华严》。君岂不见“楞严二十五圣圆通”,有两位从调出入息而证漏尽,得阿罗汉乎?其一为周梨盘特迦,其言曰:“佛问圆通,如我所证,反息循空,斯为第一”。其二为孙陀罗难陀,其言曰:“佛问圆通,我以销意,息久发明,明圆灭漏,斯为第一”。所谓反息循空者,外息断绝,气尽化神,神光照耀也。复次,“楞严十位住”中,所谓“身心合成,日益增长”,是心息相依结圣胎也。“既游道胎,亲奉觉胤,如胎已成,人相不缺”。又云:“十身灵相,一时具足”。又曰:“形成出胎,亲为佛子,名法王子住”,是道胎圆成,真人出现也。 世人只知《楞严》贬斥十种仙,不知十种仙乃地仙之流,乃仙之小乘。柱下一脉相传,契《楞严》之十住位。此中玄奥,得真传者自知之。大乘经中,妙契乃仙之小乘。柱下一脉相传,契《楞严》之十住位。此中玄奥,得真传者自知之。大乘经中,妙契玄宗“调息结胎,养胎出胎”之旨者,无有如《楞严》者也。
Interpretation

In your letter you say you no longer wish to discuss the Hinayana Sutra in Forty-two Sections, but rather the Mahayana Surangama Sutra and Avatamsaka Sutra. I will therefore speak along the lines of the Surangama and Avatamsaka.

Have you noticed that in the Surangama Sutra, in the passage on “twenty-five holy ones each realizing perfect penetration,” two of them attained the exhaustion of outflows and Arhatship by harmonizing and following the in-and-out breath? One was Udraka Ramaputra, who said: When the Buddha asked about perfect penetration, according to what I realized, reversing the breath and following emptiness is foremost. The other was Sundarananda, who said: When the Buddha asked about perfect penetration, I extinguished conceptual mind; through long breath-regulation I awakened; clarity complete, outflows extinguished—this is foremost.

What is meant by “reversing the breath and following emptiness” is that outer breathing ceases, qi is exhausted and transforms into spirit (Shen), and spirit-light shines forth. Moreover, in the Surangama’s “Ten Abodes,” the phrase “body and mind combined, daily increasing” refers to mind and breath mutually depending and forming the sacred embryo (sheng tai). It also says: “Having entered the embryo of the Way, personally receiving the heir of awakening, like the embryo complete, the human form not lacking”; “the tenfold body of spiritual marks, all complete at once”; “the form completed and born from the womb, personally becoming the Buddha’s child, abiding as Dharma Prince”—this is the meaning of the embryo of the Way perfected and the True Person appearing.

Worldly people only know that the Surangama criticizes the ten kinds of immortals, but they do not know that these ten kinds belong to the category of earthly immortals (di xian)—the Hinayana path within immortality cultivation. The lineage transmitted under the pillar aligns with the Surangama’s Ten Abodes; its profundities are grasped by those who receive the true transmission. Among Mahayana scriptures, none matches the Surangama more closely in spirit with the mysterious school’s aim of “regulating breath to form the embryo, nourishing the embryo until birth.”

台宗教观,谓一生只能登圆初住位。而玄宗修证,一生实能登十住位,上根人则证得十住之后,一超而入等妙二觉。盖十住位尽,已得法身,寿命无量,可以优游办道。最难者,由凡夫而入住也。云何入住?住位常住,若死则不明常住矣。常住即长生,谓命常住,性亦常住也。 《楞严》且置,再谈《华严》离世间品,说十种自在。其一曰“命自在”,于不可说劫住持寿命,岂非佛长生乎?又不亦常住也。 《楞严》且置,再谈《华严》离世间品,说十种自在。其一曰“命自在”,于不可说劫住持寿命,岂非佛长生乎?又不见“入法界品”,善财参海幢比丑,见其离出入息,无别思觉,入大寂定,一定六月又六日,方出定乎?所谓“离出入息,无别思觉”,正如玄宗息念双亡,身心两定时也,壶子所谓“太冲莫朕”。太冲者,虚寂之象也。莫朕者,无朕兆可窥,如羚羊挂角,渺无踪迹可寻也。此大三昧者,海幢比丑得之,玄宗之善知识亦得之。若定中心住而息不住者,乃相似寂灭,非真寂灭也。此等人入定时,若窒其呼吸,即定不住矣。故无呼吸之定,方为真定。有呼吸之定,并不值钱,死水不藏龙,岂能十身灵相,一时具足,形成出胎,亲为佛子乎哉!
Interpretation

The Tiantai school teaches that in one lifetime a person can at most realize the first of the Ten Abodes in the Perfect Teaching—the Initial Abode (chuzhu), the stage at which one first settles into the bodhisattva path. The Xuanmen path (here meaning Daoist internal alchemy and dual cultivation of nature and life) holds that in a single life one can complete all Ten Abodes; those of superior capacity, after finishing the ten abodes, can leap in one bound straight to Equal Enlightenment and Wonderful Enlightenment (the two final stages of Buddhahood).

When the ten abodes are fully cultivated, one has already attained the Dharma body and enjoys limitless lifespan, so one can pursue the Way at ease. The hardest step is crossing from ordinary person into entering the abode. What counts as entering an abode? The abode must be eternally abiding—if one still perishes when the physical body dies, one has not yet realized eternal abiding. Eternal abiding is long life: life can abide eternally, and nature can abide eternally.

Setting aside the Surangama Sutra for the moment, consider the ten kinds of mastery in the Avatamsaka Sutra, Chapter on Leaving the World—one of them is mastery over life span, dwelling in life for inconceivable kalpas. Is that not the Buddha’s long life? It is the same meaning as eternal abiding.

Turn again to the Avatamsaka, Chapter on Entering the Dharma Realm: Sudhana visits Monk Sea Banner and sees him free from in-breath and out-breath, without separate thinking or awareness, entered into great quiescent concentration, remaining there for exactly six months and six days before emerging. “Free from in-breath and out-breath, without separate thinking or awareness” resembles the Xuanmen state of extinguishing thought in dual void, body and mind forgotten; it is like Huizi’s “Great Vacuity Without Trace”—Great Vacuity is the image of empty stillness, Without Trace means nothing to be found, like an antelope hanging by its horns, vanishing without a trace. This kind of great samadhi Monk Sea Banner attained, and Xuanmen masters attain as well.

If in concentration only “the mind stays but the breath does not,” that is merely approximate quiescence, not true quiescence. Such people, if they block the breath in concentration, cannot hold the concentration. Hence concentration without breathing is true concentration; concentration with breathing is nothing special—stagnant water does not hide dragons; how then could the spiritual marks of the ten bodies be complete at once, or the form emerge from the womb and one personally become the Buddha’s child?

复次,《入法界品》,善财第五十参,见德生童子,有德童女,所居之城曰妙意华门,所,岂能十身灵相,一时具足,形成出胎,亲为佛子乎哉! 复次,《入法界品》,善财第五十参,见德生童子,有德童女,所居之城曰妙意华门,所说法门曰幻住解脱,亦是“心息相依,偶谐三昧”之密意也。试观善财以前所见诸善知识,皆单独一人,此则成偶,非一阴一阳之表示,心息谐合之法象而何?童男童女,同住同行,约修道,在果位以定慧为偶谐,在因位以心息为偶谐。妙字亦是象也,一阴一阳也。曰妙意华门者,亦犹老氏之众妙门、玄牝门也。当心息谐合之际,有两相知之微意。当静定阳生之际,时至神知,如子识母,妙不容言,非妙意乎?心与息相随,鸾凤犹老氏之众妙门、玄牝门也。当心息谐合之际,有两相知之微意。当静定阳生之际,时至神知,如子识母,妙不容言,非妙意乎?心与息相随,鸾凤和谐,天然夫妇,而男不宽衣,女不解带,敬如神明,爱如赤子,非幻住乎?故云“幻住解脱”,直至大定真定,无去无来,不出不入,内外两忘,身心俱寂,空寂无依,是谓无住。由幻住而达无住,玄修之功备矣。
Interpretation

In the Chapter on Entering the Dharma Realm (Ru Fajie Pin), Sudhana’s fiftieth meeting is with the boy Desheng and the girl Youde. Their city is called Miao Yi Hua Men (Wonderful Intention Flower Gate), and the Dharma gate they teach is named “Illusory Abiding Liberation” (Huanzhu Jietuo). Within that teaching lies a deep meaning: heart and breath relying on each other, and a samadhi reached when the pair momentarily align.

Notice that most of Sudhana’s earlier teachers appear alone; here a pair appears together—is that not an image of yin and yang, of heart and breath in harmony? Boy and girl live and travel together: at the level of fruition, samadhi and wisdom (ding and hui) are the pair in accord; at the level of practice, heart and mind on one side and breath on the other are the pair in accord. The word “miao” (subtle/wonderful) is also an image—one yin, one yang. “Miao Yi Hua Men” is like the gate of manifold subtleties or the gate of the mysterious female (xuanpin zhi men) in Laozi: when heart and breath harmonize, there is a fine mutual knowing between the two; when stillness deepens and yang qi rises and the moment arrives, spirit knows it by itself, like a child knowing its mother—beyond words, is that not “wonderful intention”? Heart follows breath as phoenix mates with luan in natural union, a metaphor of husband and wife—yet the boy does not loosen his robe nor the girl undo her sash; they revere each other as spirits and cherish each other as infants—is that not “illusory abiding”? Hence the name “Illusory Abiding Liberation”: only when great samadhi, true samadhi, is reached—no going, no coming, neither exiting nor entering, inner and outer both forgotten, body and mind utterly still, empty stillness with nothing to lean on—is it called non-abiding (wuzhu). From illusory abiding one arrives at non-abiding; inner cultivation at this point can be said to be complete.

经又云:“时童子童女说自解脱已,以不思议诸善根力,令善财身柔软光泽。”释曰:所谓柔软,即由心息相依,至周身酥软之景也。白紫清曰:“待尔行持三两日,天地日月软如绵”。此真效也。光泽乃元阳光气之发乎肌肤,见于外表之谓也。《黄庭经》云:“体生光华气香兰”,钟离翁云:“玉膏流润生光明”,同此意也。此第五十参之象,甚契玄宗的旨。但自来疏《华严》者,离翁云:“玉膏流润生光明”,同此意也。此第五十参之象,甚契玄宗的旨。但自来疏《华严》者,均言性理,以童男童女表定慧。而因地凡夫,实无定慧,将如何下手进修乎?妙意华门城,亦人人有之。经师指破玄关一窍,自然知也。此种深密之表象,外人固未易与言。故二十年来,弟亦从未揭示,恐生谤故。兹为我兄言之,庶几别有乾坤,壶中日月,幻住解脱,真有不可思议之神效矣。 四 通 来函云:“仙贵长生,佛贵无生”。须知无生,只是不着生相,非谓如枯木寒灰,毫无生气。若果如枯木寒灰,即落空亡之外道,非佛氏不生不灭之的旨也。
Interpretation

The scripture also says: “At that time, after the boy and girl had spoken of their own liberation, by the power of inconceivable roots of goodness they caused Sudhana’s body—the youth Sudhana in the Avatamsaka Sutra who visits spiritual benefactors—to become soft and lustrous.” The explanation is this: “Soft” means that mind and breath rest upon and merge with each other, reaching a state in which the whole body becomes supple and pliant. Bai Ziqing (Bai Yuchan, a Song-dynasty Daoist Neidan [internal alchemy] master) says: “Wait until you have practiced for two or three days, and heaven, earth, sun, and moon will all be soft as cotton.” This is a genuine sign of efficacy. “Lustrous” means that the luminous Qi (vital energy) of Yuanyang (original yang, the innate yang Qi) radiates through the skin and manifests on the exterior. The Huangting Jing (Yellow Court Scripture, a Daoist Neidan classic) says, “The body gives rise to radiance, and the breath is like orchid fragrance”; Zhongli Weng (Zhongli Quan, one of the Eight Immortals) says, “Jade paste (in Neidan, the moistening of Jing [essence] and Qi) flows and moistens, and light appears.” These all mean the same thing. This is the image manifested at the fiftieth visit, and it accords well with the purport of the Daoist Mysterious Gate. Yet commentators on the Avatamsaka Sutra throughout history have mostly explained it in terms of nature and principle, taking the boy and girl as symbols of Ding and Hui (meditative concentration and wisdom). But ordinary beings at the causal stage do not actually possess Ding and Hui; from what point, then, should they begin to practice and advance? Miaoyi Huamen City—a realm visited by Sudhana in the Avatamsaka Sutra—is in fact originally inherent in everyone. Once a scripture master reveals and breaks through the single aperture of the Mysterious Pass (Xuanguan yiqiao, the key pass in Neidan cultivation), one naturally understands. Such profound and secret symbolism is originally not easy for outsiders to explain clearly. Therefore for twenty years I have never revealed it, fearing it would provoke slander. Now that I speak of it to you, elder brother, perhaps you can realize that there is another world, like the sun and moon within a gourd (a Neidan realm), and attain liberation within the illusory—truly with inconceivable divine efficacy.

IV. Penetration

Your letter says: “The immortals value long life; the Buddhists value non-arising.” You should know that “non-arising” only means not clinging to the mark of arising; it does not mean being like withered wood and cold ashes, utterly without vitality. If it were truly like withered wood and cold ashes, it would fall into the heterodox path of empty annihilation (kongwang waidao, the deviation of clinging to emptiness and annihilation), and would not be the true purport of the Buddhist teaching of neither arising nor ceasing. Laozi’s statement that heaven and earth are able to endure long and continue does not mean being like withered wood and cold ashes, utterly without vitality either; if it were truly withered wood and cold ashes, that would be the heterodox path of empty annihilation, not the true purport of the Buddhist teaching of neither arising nor ceasing.

老子曰:“天地之所以长且相,非谓如枯木寒灰,毫无生气。若果如枯木寒灰,即落空亡之外道,非佛氏不生不灭之的旨也。 老子曰:“天地之所以长且久者,以其不自生,故能长生”。所谓不自生者,即不执着生,真生而无生也。《永嘉证道歌》云:“谁无念,谁无生,着实无生无不生”。此谓苟证无生之理,则亦无死,乃无生无不生也。是则老氏之长生,非落常见;佛氏之无生,亦非落断见。无生而生,佛也;生而无生,仙也。奚可打成两橛,而分优劣耶?知乎此,即知无佛而不仙,无仙,亦非落断见。无生而生,佛也;生而无生,仙也。奚可打成两橛,而分优劣耶?知乎此,即知无佛而不仙,无仙而不佛,真无生即得真长生,真长生即妙契真无生,仙佛两宗,至此藩篱可以尽撤矣。 今之释氏门徒,一闻长生,则斥为外道,非佛本旨。不知佛为执着命元,情见未破者,示以无生。若情见已破,正好示以长生。《法华》开权显实,《华严》情量破尽,皆示命自在之秘旨。最后说涅盘,则以入大涅盘,不老不死,与东土黄老,心心相印。奚可泥执一边,以,皆示命自在之秘旨。最后说涅盘,则以入大涅盘,不老不死,与东土黄老,心心相印。奚可泥执一边,以无生归佛,长生归老,尊视无生而藐视长生乎?须知无生、长生,不过折摄门庭不同而已。 五 通
Interpretation

Laozi said: “Heaven and earth endure because they do not live for themselves; therefore they can long endure.” What “not living for oneself” means is not clinging to the idea of “life”—true life is actually that “non-birth” which transcends the distinction between life and death. The Zhengdao Ge of Yongjia states: “Who is without thought? Who is without birth? If one truly realizes non-birth, then there is nothing that is not born.” The meaning is: if one truly penetrates the principle of non-birth, then “death” no longer applies, and one reaches the state where there is no birth yet nothing is unborn. Understood this way, Laozi’s “long endurance” is not falling into eternalism (the view that life is fixed and unchanging); Buddhism’s “non-birth” is not falling into annihilationism (the view that everything is extinguished and utterly void). To manifest “birth” through “non-birth” is the Buddhist path; to awaken to “non-birth” through “birth” is the immortals’ path. How can these be forcibly split in two and ranked as superior or inferior? Once this is clear, one knows that without Buddhism there is no true immortal, and without immortality one cannot become a true Buddha—whoever truly realizes non-birth naturally attains true longevity; true longevity subtly accords with true non-birth. At this point, the two traditions of immortals and Buddhas can set aside sectarian bias.

Nowadays some Buddhist disciples, as soon as they hear “longevity,” denounce it as a heterodox teaching and say it is not the heart of the Dharma. They do not understand: the Buddha taught “non-birth” to those still attached to the vital principle and whose emotional clinging is not yet broken; when emotional clinging is broken, it is precisely then that “longevity” should be taught. The Lotus Sutra’s opening of provisional means to reveal the real, and the Avatamsaka Sutra’s teaching on the exhaustion of emotional measure, both disclose the secret meaning of mastery over life. Finally speaking of nirvana is also entering great nirvana—neither aging nor dying—in perfect resonance with the Huang-Lao learning of the Eastern land. How can one cling to one side alone, assign “non-birth” to the Buddha and “longevity” to Laozi, and revere only non-birth while scorning longevity? Know that “non-birth” and “longevity” are merely different gateways and skillful means for guiding beings—they are not fundamentally opposed.

《楞严》《华严》,固已仙佛交参矣;然尤妙者,当推《大涅盘》。迦叶问佛:“云何得长寿,金刚不坏身,复以何因缘,得大坚固力?”是公然问长生矣。 《四相品》云:“譬如陶师,作已还破。解脱不尔,真解脱者,不生不灭,是故解脱即是如来。如来亦尔,不生不灭,不老不死,不破不坏,非有为法,以是义故,名曰如来。入大涅盘,不老者,不生不灭,是故解脱即是如来。如来亦尔,不生不灭,不老不死,不破不坏,非有为法,以是义故,名曰如来。入大涅盘,不老不死,有何等义?老者名曰迁变,发白而皱,身坏命终。如是等法,解脱中无,以无是事,故名解脱。如来亦无发白面皱有为之法,是故如来无有老也。无有老故,则无有死。又解脱者,名曰无病。所谓病者,四百四病,及余外来侵害损身者,是处无故,故名解脱。无疾病者,即真解脱。真解脱者,即是如来。如来无病,是故法身亦无有病。如是无病,即是如来。死者名曰身坏命终,是处无死,即是者,即是如来。如来无病,是故法身亦无有病。如是无病,即是如来。死者名曰身坏命终,是处无死,即是甘露。是甘露者,即真解脱。真解脱者,即是如来。如来成就如是功德,云何当言如来无常?若言无常,无有是处,是金刚身,云何无常?是故如来不名命终。”
Interpretation

In the Surangama Sutra and Avatamsaka Sutra, immortal cultivation and Buddhist doctrine are already intertwined; if one asks which treatment is most refined, the Mahaparinirvana Sutra stands out.

The sutra records that Kāśyapa asked the Buddha: “How can one obtain long life and a vajra-indestructible body? And relying on what causes and conditions can one gain great firm power?” That is, in effect, openly asking about the path to longevity.

The Mahaparinirvana Sutra, “Chapter on the Four Characteristics,” says: “It is like a potter who makes vessels and then breaks them again. Liberation is not like that—true liberation is neither born nor destroyed, so liberation is the Tathāgata. The Tathāgata is likewise: neither born nor destroyed, neither aged nor dead, neither broken nor ruined, not a conditioned phenomenon; therefore it is called Tathāgata. One enters great nirvana. What is meant by ‘not aging’? It is neither born nor destroyed; thus liberation is the Tathāgata. The Tathāgata is also neither born nor destroyed, neither aged nor dead, neither broken nor ruined, not a conditioned phenomenon; therefore it is called Tathāgata. After entering great nirvana, how is there no aging and no death? What is ‘aging’? It is change—white hair, wrinkled skin, the body’s decay and life’s end; all of this is called aging. In liberation there is none of this; because these things are absent, it is called liberation. The Tathāgata likewise has no conditioned signs such as white hair or wrinkled face; therefore the Tathāgata has no aging; with no aging, there is no death. Moreover, liberation is called freedom from disease. What is ‘disease’? The four hundred and four diseases and external harm that injures the body, and the like—in liberation there is none of this; therefore it is called liberation. Freedom from disease is true liberation; true liberation is the Tathāgata. The Tathāgata is without disease; the dharmakāya is also without disease. Such freedom from disease is the Tathāgata. ‘Death’ means the body’s decay and life’s end; where there is no death here, that is ambrosia; ambrosia is true liberation, true liberation is the Tathāgata. The Tathāgata accomplishes such merit—how can one say the Tathāgata is impermanent? If one says impermanent, there is no basis for it. This is the vajra body—how could it be impermanent? Therefore the Tathāgata is not said to reach life’s end.”

此节如来广示得真解脱者,不生不灭,不破不坏,不老不死,无有发白面皱等丑态。无有疾病,与仙长生无二无别,可称仙佛沆瀣一气,水乳交融者矣。 奈何今之学佛者,高自标榜,藐视仙宗,目为外道,斥为七趣。而自身疾病之来,既不能免,发白面皱等迁变,亦不能免,与俗人初无有别。大涅盘之为何?真趣。而自身疾病之来,既不能免,发白面皱等迁变,亦不能免,与俗人初无有别。大涅盘之为何?真解脱之为何?甘露之妙,更不必谈矣。须知世尊灭后,得大涅盘不老不死之旨趣者,却在玄宗。故王文治广参佛乘,年逾八十,幡然归道而从仙人游也。(摘自田诚阳辑《仙学解秘》) 附录三 李庭光老人日记一则 颂尧老师说:“汪东亭先生在沪传道数十年,自己不能成道,年已衰老。涵虚老师至,教以投胎夺舍之功法。东亭先生去世时告他(按:当指徐颂尧),到某时某地去找他(按:当接指汪东亭)。适近战争之期,他(按:当指徐颂夺舍之功法。东亭先生去世时告他(按:当指徐颂尧),到某时某地去找他(按:当接指汪东亭)。适近战争之期,他(按:当指徐颂尧)未能去找。我认为不忘“本真”,则可投胎夺舍也。
Interpretation

In this section, the Tathāgata teaches at length: one who attains true liberation is neither born nor destroyed, neither broken nor ruined, neither aged nor dead; there is no grey hair, wrinkled face, or other marks of decay, nor illness—no different from the long life sought by immortals. Immortal and Buddhist paths share one breath; they blend like milk in water.

Sadly, many who study Buddhism today look down on the immortal way, treating the immortal tradition as a heterodox path and one of the seven destinies of rebirth. Yet when they fall ill, they are not spared; when their hair turns white and their faces wrinkle, they are not spared either—no different from ordinary people. What is great nirvāṇa? What is true liberation? As for the wonder of amṛta—the nectar of liberation in the scriptures—there is no need to elaborate. Know that after the World-Honored One entered nirvāṇa, it was rather on the side of the Mysterious Gate—Daoist and immortal learning—that the message of “great nirvāṇa, neither old nor dead” could still be embodied. That is why Wang WenZhi, though he had widely studied the Buddhist vehicle, turned to the Dao in his eighties and followed immortals in their wanderings.


Appendix III: An Entry from Elder Li Tingguang’s Diary

Teacher Song Yao said: Wang Dongting taught the Way in Shanghai for decades but did not attain the Dao himself and grew old. When Master Hanxu arrived, he taught him the method of rebirth through seizing a body (tou tai duo she). Before he died, Master Dongting told him (Xu Songyao) to find him (Wang Dongting) at a certain time and place. Because of the war, he (Xu Songyao) could not go. I believe: as long as one does not forget one’s “original authenticity,” one can be reborn through seizing a body.

(按:本《日记》一则是上海林锋先生提供。李庭光先生曾师于徐颂尧,即海印子。于世纪年代中,李庭光先生同因是子蒋维乔、胡美成、陆子冬、楚湘江、顾伯述、卢怀道等七人组成“七君子养生茶座”,探讨道家学术。此云:西派初祖李涵虚真人亲至沪上,传予体真山人汪东亭“投胎夺舍”之功。按清·李道山《李涵虚真人小传》载,李涵虚升举于年(清咸初祖李涵虚真人亲至沪上,传予体真山人汪东亭“投胎夺舍”之功。按清·李道山《李涵虚真人小传》载,李涵虚升举于年(清咸丰丙辰年)。而其不晚于世纪年代又显化于世,传度汪东亭,距逝已六七十年矣。林锋先生于斯处批曰:“初读这一则时,真可谓心惊肉跳”。予何不然!斯亦可见古传丹道效验之殊胜,生命自控及生命再造云云信不诬也。道教学者陈撄宁先生(~)曾言:“投胎是否真有把握,宁苦于不能以事实证明,仅相信其异于常人而已”。此则亦然,是否属实,予不知也。仅附录收于此,做为文献资料,留待科学工作者考证研究耳苦于不能以事实证明,仅相信其异于常人而已”。此则亦然,是否属实,予不知也。仅附录收于此,做为文献资料,留待科学工作者考证研究耳!又,投胎夺舍之法,共有四种,即投胎、夺舍、借尸、转世,所谓“四果”之义也。——感克琦识)
Interpretation

A Diary Entry Related to the Tianle Collection (Modern Paraphrase)

Note: What follows is not text from an ancient scripture but the editor’s commentary and reflections on a diary entry. The original biography contains repeated and garbled dates; the account below is arranged for clarity.


This diary was provided by Mr. Lin Feng of Shanghai. Mr. Li Tingguang had studied under Xu Songyao (style name Haiyinzi). In the 1950s and 1960s, Li Tingguang and six others—Jiang Weiqiao (styled Yin), Hu Meicheng, Lu Zidong, Chu Xiangjiang, Gu Boshu, and Lu Huaidao—formed the “Seven Gentlemen Health Cultivation Tea Salon,” where they discussed Daoist learning together.

The diary records that Li Hanxu, the founding patriarch of the Western School of inner alchemy (Xipai), came to Shanghai in person and transmitted the practice of touduo duoshe (reincarnation and taking a new bodily “shelter”) to Wang Dongting, Hermit of Embodying Truth (Tizhen Shanren). The Qing-era Brief Biography of Perfect Man Li Hanxu (Li Hanxu Zhenren Xiaozhuan) states that Li Hanxu ascended and left the world in the bingchen year of the Xianfeng reign (1856). Yet the diary also says that no later than the 1950s and 1960s he appeared again among humans and passed the teaching to Wang Dongting—more than sixty or seventy years after the recorded ascension. Mr. Lin Feng annotated: “When I first read this entry, I was truly shaken.” The editor had much the same reaction.

From this one can also glimpse how strange the effects recorded in traditional inner alchemy can be, and that claims about autonomous mastery over life and “re-creation” of the body are not necessarily empty talk. The Daoist scholar Chen Yingning (1880–1969) once said that whether touduo (rebirth into a new womb) can be relied upon cannot be proved by ordinary evidence; one can only trust that it differs from what common people experience. Whether this diary entry is factual, the editor cannot determine; it is appended here for documentary reference, to await verification by future scientific investigators.

Further, teachings of the touduo duoshe type are often divided into four: touduo (entering a womb), duoshe (seizing a shelter/body), jieshi (borrowing a corpse), and zhuanshi (transmigration)—together called the meaning of the “four fruitions.”

—Signed, Gan Keqi

附录四 胡美成先生《南宗丹诀释义跋》文摘录 “(世纪)年代初,余又三走姑苏,亲访苏沪杭着名道学专家玄静居士徐颂尧先生。徐先生毕业于清华大学,一生致力于道学研究,年近,门徒逾千,着有《天乐集》余卷行世,但对阴阳派学术亦避而不谈”。 “道家内丹功夫,无论清修、双修,活子阳生采药一节为至关重要,然道书亦多不明言,此亦有《天乐集》余卷行世,但对阴阳派学术亦避而不谈”。
Interpretation

This passage is taken from an appendix excerpt of Mr. Hu Meicheng’s postscript to Exegesis of Southern School Elixir Formulas. In substance it runs as follows.

In the early twentieth century I went three more times to the Suzhou region and personally called on Mr. Xu Songyao of Suzhou, Shanghai, and Hangzhou—a noted specialist in Daoist studies who styled himself Xuanjing Jushi (Recluse of Mysterious Stillness). Mr. Xu was a graduate of Tsinghua University and devoted his life to Daoist studies. Though already very advanced in years, he had more than a thousand disciples and left several volumes of Tianle Ji (Collection of Heavenly Joy) in circulation; yet he avoided discussing the learning of the “Yin-Yang school.”

In Daoist internal alchemy (Neidan), whether on the path of pure solitary cultivation or dual cultivation, the phase of “living zi hour, yang arising, and gathering the medicine” is crucial—yet Daoist books often stop short of spelling it out. The same reticence applies to Tianle Ji: though many volumes circulate, it likewise keeps silent on the Yin-Yang school’s teachings.

Notes (to help read the original):

  • Xuanjing Jushi: A religious or lay practitioner’s style name.
  • Pure cultivation / dual cultivation: In Neidan, commonly the distinction between solitary practice and male–female joint practice, among other routes.
  • Living zi, yang arising, gathering the medicine: Neidan terms for the critical stage when the “medicine” is said to arise and may be taken up in practice.
  • Yin-Yang school: Here usually lineages or doctrines tied to yin–yang dual cultivation—hence the author’s remark that Mr. Xu “avoided discussing” it.
“道家内丹功夫,无论清修、双修,活子阳生采药一节为至关重要,然道书亦多不明言,此亦不传之秘。活子时有三:曰真子时,正子时,假子时。活子阳生,起火采药。药又分老嫩,有一阳、二阳、三阳之别。药名真种,故张紫阳《悟真篇》诗云:‘鼎内若无真种子,休将炉火煮空铛’。活子阳生采药,未得真传,亦多有难明真象者。如道学家徐颂尧着《天乐集》,其中有谓静功炼得纯阳真气萌动时,浑身酥麻、跳动,跳动一次即行一次小周天,如是渐采渐集。吁!酥麻、轻重等是练功常见的‘八触’现象,把八触当作活子阳生采药事,实不应该。……倘若修炼静功,错把八触当阳生,兴阳为坏事,且任令元气走泄,前功尽弃,真是可惜”触当作活子阳生采药事,实不应该。……倘若修炼静功,错把八触当阳生,兴阳为坏事,且任令元气走泄,前功尽弃,真是可惜”。
Interpretation

This passage addresses one of the most critical—and most often poorly explained—steps in Neidan (internal alchemy): “living zi hour yang arising, raising fire and gathering the medicine.” Whether one follows qingxiu (solitary cultivation) or shuangxiu (paired male–female practice), this stage cannot be skipped; many Daoist texts only hint at it, treating it as a secret not lightly transmitted.

Huozi shi (the living zi hour) is generally divided into three kinds: true zi hour, proper zi hour, and false zi hour. What is meant by living zi yang arising is that inner yang qi truly stirs, so one can raise fire (ignite inner fire) and gather the medicine (collect and fix essence and qi). The medicine also has degrees of maturity—“old” and “young”—and texts often speak of one yang, two yang, three yang, and so on at different levels; in Neidan, true essence and true qi are called the true seed. Hence Zhang Ziyang (Zhang Boduan) writes in the Wuzhen pian (Awakening to Reality): “If there is no true seed in the cauldron, do not bother heating an empty pot”—without the true seed, refinement is empty motion.

Without authentic transmission on living zi yang arising and gathering medicine, many people cannot even tell what the true signs look like. For example, the Daoist scholar Xu Songyao writes in the Tianle ji (Collection of Heavenly Joy): when quiet practice reaches the point where pure yang true qi first stirs, the whole body feels numb tingling and twitching; each twitch completes one small heavenly circuit (xiaozhou tian), and in this way one gradually gathers and gradually accumulates. The author here disagrees: sensations like numbness, lightness or heaviness are common eight touches (eight kinds of bodily feeling) in seated meditation; to take the eight touches for living zi yang arising and gathering medicine is to invert root and branch.

If in quiet practice one mistakes the eight touches for yang arising, and treats xing yang (yang qi outward flare—desire, emission, and the like) as something good, allowing yuan qi (original qi) to leak away, one often loses everything built up before—a great pity.

(按:胡美成先生《南宗丹诀释义跋》文是上海林锋先生提供。胡美成先生曾三走姑苏,亲访徐颂尧,问事阴阳派学术,云颂尧“避而不谈”。“避而不谈”者,非谓不明阴阳派学术也,实因其间必有不言之苦衷,而不愿谈及耳。且看海印《答复汤慕玄君十问》中问及《道书十七种》是正是邪,答曰:“曾游龙藏,自然到眼立分”。概《道书十七种》中收有《玄微心印》及《三峰丹诀十七种》是正是邪,答曰:“曾游龙藏,自然到眼立分”。概《道书十七种》中收有《玄微心印》及《三峰丹诀》等,均是阴阳法派名着。既云“曾游龙藏,自然到眼立分”,传之不当,贻害尤深,故讷其口也。又世传西派为阴阳双修派,据予所知,西派可分二大传承系统,一力主清修派,二力主双修派。然清修派不无深谙阴阳之学,而双修派亦当得清修精髓。因时地外缘具备不同,各取所修所证,又必异途同归。外缘不备者,深怀潜藏,讷口不言,以免招致不必要的干扰。《清净经》中云:“人能常清净,天地悉皆归”。天地之精华既能招摄,何岂人元不得摄乎?清·闵一得辑《古书隐楼藏书·泥丸李祖女宗双修宝筏》中云:“孤修非至道,同类自相须,身外有身者,天地之精华既能招摄,何岂人元不得摄乎?
Interpretation

In his postscript to Annotations on the Southern School Alchemical Formulas, Mr. Hu Meicheng’s essay was supplied by Mr. Lin Feng of Shanghai. Mr. Hu visited Suzhou three times in person to call on Xu Songyao and inquire into the Yin-Yang school (a branch of Neidan [internal alchemy] that emphasizes dual cultivation between men and women, among other teachings). It is said that Xu Songyao “declined to discuss it.” “Declining to discuss it” does not mean he was ignorant of the Yin-Yang school; rather, there were surely painful reasons that could not be stated plainly, and he did not wish to say more. Consider Haiyin Daoren’s Reply to Tang Muxuan’s Ten Questions: when someone asked whether the Seventeen Daoist Books were orthodox or heterodox, he answered: “If one has truly wandered through the Longzang [the great Buddhist canon repository], what meets the eye is naturally distinguished at once.” (Longzang is the great scripture treasury; the meaning is that if one has genuinely browsed widely in the canon collections, one can tell at a glance.) The Seventeen Daoist Books includes works such as Xuanwei Xinyin and Sanfeng Danjue—celebrated texts of the Yin-Yang alchemical line. Since he said “If one has truly wandered through the Longzang, what meets the eye is naturally distinguished at once,” if one did not expose it on the spot yet allowed it to circulate casually, the harm would run deeper—hence silence. It is also widely said in the world that the Western school (the Neidan Western school) belongs to the Yin-Yang dual-cultivation line. As far as I know, the Western school can broadly be divided into two major transmissions: one strongly advocates pure cultivation (solitary practice, not relying on male–female partnership), and one strongly advocates dual cultivation. Yet among pure-cultivation adherents there are also many who deeply understand Yin-Yang learning, and the dual-cultivation line must likewise grasp the essentials of pure cultivation; because times, places, and outer conditions differ, each cultivates and verifies in their own way, yet all converge in the end. When outer conditions are not in place, one can only keep it hidden in the heart and hold one’s tongue, lest unnecessary disturbance be invited. The Qingjing Jing (Scripture of Purity and Stillness) says: “When a person can constantly remain pure and still, heaven and earth all return to them.” If the essence of heaven and earth can be gathered in, can the human yuan (the root of vital essence inherent in the body) not be gathered in as well? The Gushu Yinlou Cangshu · Niwang Lizu Nüzong Shuangxiu Baofa (Treasure Raft of Dual Cultivation for the Female Line of Patriarch Li of the Mud Pill), compiled by Min Yide in the Qing dynasty, states: “Solitary cultivation is not the ultimate Way; like kinds need one another; there is a body outside the body…”

清·闵一得辑《古书隐楼藏书·泥丸李祖女宗双修宝筏》中云:“孤修非至道,同类自相须,身外有身者,形忘堪事诸”。又云:“人元遍大千,三元一心领。不外心寂虚,不外身无梗。动静合真常,我无元自并”。斯论启人慧目。三元者,天元、地元、人元,而“人元遍大千”,非唯于彼家鼎内。三元作用,全凭一心领摄,究其功诀,不外“心寂虚”、“身无梗”耳,即“身心两忘,大定真空”者,亦“人能常清净,天地悉皆归”之旨也。若能“形忘”而致“身外有身”之境界,则“堪事诸”,孤非徒孤,双非徒双,“同类自相须”耳。《参同契》所谓“磁石吸铁,隔碍潜通”。是故,清修之中不无有双修之旨,双修之中亦有清净之功。真修之士,大可持此清净功诀融于双修,彼我共修,“同游于无极之野”,中亦有清净之功。真修之士,大可持此清净功诀融于双修,彼我共修,“同游于无极之野”,必双双受益,不无夫妻俱仙之举!虽双修派中另有“铸剑”、“调鼎”之功,诀法固妙,恐不如斯安稳而无流弊,人人可以实证,亦无须另拟种种戒律约束。所谓“其义至密而迹至显者”,非此义乎?
Interpretation

In the Qing dynasty, Min Yide wrote in Gushu Yinlou Cangshu · Niwang Lizu Nüzong Shuangxiu Baofa (Hidden Tower Library · Mud-pill Ancestor Li’s Treasure Raft of Dual Cultivation for the Female Line): “Cultivating alone is not the highest path; those of the same kind must complement one another. Only when one can reach ‘a body beyond the body’ and forget the physical form can one accomplish the various tasks.” He also said: “This single unity of the person fills the great thousand worlds; the heaven yuan, earth yuan, and human yuan all depend on the one mind to gather and govern them. The essential knack is nothing beyond: the mind must be still and empty, the body must flow without blockage. Movement and stillness accord with the true constant; when the sense of self is exhausted, primordial Qi (Yuanqi) naturally merges as one.” These words can open the eye of wisdom in people.

The so-called Three Yuan are heaven yuan, earth yuan, and human yuan. “The human yuan fills the great thousand” does not refer only to the partner’s cauldron-furnace setup in the other school; the deployment of the Three Yuan is entirely led and gathered by the one mind. If you trace the oral formula of the practice, it is nothing more than “mind still and empty, body without obstruction”—that is, forgetting both body and mind, great samadhi and great emptiness, the same intent as “when people can constantly be pure and still, heaven and earth all return to them.” If one can “forget form” and reach the state of “a body outside the body,” then one can “undertake the various tasks”: solitary cultivation is not mere loneliness, and dual cultivation is not merely two people facing each other—it is simply “those of the same kind needing one another.” What the Cantong Qi (Token of the Unity of the Three) calls “the lodestone draws iron; obstacles do not block the hidden connection” means exactly this.

Therefore, within pure solitary practice there is by no means an absence of the aim of dual cultivation; within dual cultivation there is likewise its own work of purity and stillness. True practitioners can fully weave this pure formula into dual cultivation and cultivate together, “wandering together in the wilderness of Wuji (the Limitless),” to the certain benefit of both parties—there are no lack of cases of husband and wife attaining proof together. Although the dual-cultivation line has other arts such as “forging the sword” and “adjusting the cauldron,” with formulas that are indeed subtle, they are perhaps not as secure and free of abuse as this approach; everyone can verify it in person, and there is no need to erect various precepts to constrain people. What is meant by “the meaning is most hidden yet the trace is most plain” is precisely this.

胡美成先生又批评以“酥麻跳动”为阳生药产的错误。“酥麻跳动”之秘义,详参《天乐集》可也。聪明学者,必悉所示为何,予不另辨矣。海印同门魏尧在《大道真传》中云:“古来着书立说,皆对时弊而言”。海印、美成之论断,亦均纠正时弊之言。以《伍柳仙魏尧在《大道真传》中云:“古来着书立说,皆对时弊而言”。海印、美成之论断,亦均纠正时弊之言。以《伍柳仙宗》而言,强调外肾举动为阳生之候。不明自然妙用者,执象着形,尚未及“致虚”之境,先妄想阳生,甚至流于色相,又何言“人能常清净”者?因此,海印着书立说以纠时弊,仅标“酥软麻木”为阳生,概未使初学着相也。若“致虚极,守静笃”之中“酥软麻木”,直至“酥软快乐”,亦发生此象,则阳生药产之为候自然生成,方为药源水清。美成先生所批评者,实批误将“八触”错认阳生及不识阳生之弊。八触现象,实为入静初阶之表象,仅是气血初通,心识初静之效验,尚未望及“阳生药产”之项背。以美成前辈之博生之弊。八触现象,实为入静初阶之表象,仅是气血初通,心识初静之效验,尚未望及“阳生药产”之项背。以美成前辈之博知,自深知海印之用心。是以,胡美成先生之批评固是,而海印子所示亦有奥旨。——盛克琦识)
Interpretation

Mr. Hu Meicheng also criticized another mistake: treating “tingling numbness and twitching” as proof that yang qi is arising and the elixir is taking effect. For the deeper meaning of “tingling numbness and twitching,” one may read the Tianle Ji in detail. A perceptive student of the Way will understand what the book is pointing at; there is no need to argue the point separately here. Haiyin’s fellow disciple Wei Yao says in The True Transmission of the Great Dao: “When the ancients wrote books and set forth teachings, it was always to address the abuses of their own time.” The judgments of Haiyin and Meicheng likewise aim to correct contemporary errors. In the Wu-Liu immortal lineage (the neidan tradition associated with Wu Chongxu and Liu Huayang), it was once stressed that a response in the external kidneys (the genitals) was a sign of yang qi stirring. People who do not understand natural subtle function cling to images and are trapped in form; they have not yet reached the stage of “attaining utmost emptiness” (zhixu) in the mind, yet already fantasize about yang qi arising—even sliding into attachment to sensual appearance—so how can they speak of “when people can constantly be pure and still”? Therefore Haiyin wrote to correct the times: he marked only “soft numbness and tingling” as the sign of yang birth, and altogether avoided leading beginners to fixate on appearances. If, in practice devoted to “attain utmost emptiness, hold fast to stillness” (zhixu ji, shou jing du), similar phenomena appear all the way from “soft numbness and tingling” to “soft ease and joy,” then the signs of yang birth and elixir production will form naturally—only then is the source-water of the medicine clear. What Mr. Meicheng criticized was precisely the error of mistaking the “eight touches” (the eight common bodily sensations in entering stillness) for yang birth, and the deeper fault of not recognizing the true signs of yang birth at all. The eight touches are only surface phenomena at the beginning of entering stillness—the effect of blood and qi first opening and the mind first settling—not yet anywhere near “yang birth and elixir production.” Given Elder Meicheng’s erudition, he naturally understood Haiyin’s earnest intent. Thus Mr. Hu Meicheng’s criticism is indeed well founded, and what Zi Haiyin indicated also carries profound meaning. (—Sheng Keqi, note)

附录五 田诚阳道长辑《仙学解秘》“学道利益”按语 海印子,西派之杰也。专做身外功夫,与伍柳派守下丹田之法,迥然不同。其身外功夫如何?张义尚在所着之《仙道漫谈》按语中,言之颇详,兹介绍如下: “西派别传超等天元丹法,于鼻外径寸色法两身交界点中安神调息。有息则在鼻外虚空中相依,无息则在鼻外虚空中入定。以此功始,即以此功圆”。
Interpretation

Appendix Five of the Tianle Ji: Vernacular Commentary on “Benefits of Learning the Dao” from Tian Chengyang Daozhang’s compilation Secrets of Immortal Learning

Haiyinzi was a leading figure in the West School (Xipai, the internal alchemy West School lineage). He focused on extra-body practice (shenwai gongfu), which differs markedly from the Wu-Liu School’s approach of holding the lower dantian. How is that extra-body practice actually done? Zhang Yishang gives a fairly clear account in the commentary to his Casual Talk on the Immortal Way (Xian Dao Man Tan), in substance as follows:

The West School also preserves a separate transmission of a supreme Tianyuan (Heavenly Origin) elixir method: at a spot about an inch outside the nose, at the junction of the “two bodies” in the Li method (the color/desire aspect of practice), one settles the spirit and regulates the breath. While breath is present, one rests in the void outside the nose; when breath falls away, one enters absorption in that same void outside the nose. Practice opens with this single method and closes the circuit with it as well—the beginning and the end never leave this one anchor in the void outside the nose.

For readers of the original: “Extra-body practice” means not fixing attention on the lower dantian inside the abdomen, but instead setting up the “furnace” and tuning breath at a locus such as the void outside the nose. “Tianyuan elixir method” names methods that take Tianyuan—the upper, the void, or pre-heaven primordial Qi, in common usage—as their root. The closing line in the source that begins “Mr. Zhang Tao proposed…” looks like a slip or a broken sentence and repeats material from Zhang Yishang’s commentary; this vernacular rendering follows only the part of the main text that reads complete.

(按:此“按语”是湖北天门张涛先生提鼻外虚空中相依,无息则在鼻外虚空中入定。以此功始,即以此功圆”。 (按:此“按语”是湖北天门张涛先生提供。张义尚先生,四川忠县人,于佛道两家学术均有精湛的研究。从《仙道漫谈》按语中可以看出,张先生对西派丹法也颇知之,一语言中要害,实为画龙点晴之作。并且张先生将此丹法称做“超等天元丹法”,推崇之情尽于言表矣。然将此列为“西派别传”,恐非妥当。西派丹学,多归类于人元丹法之阴阳法派,故老先生以此出发,将西派清修做“西派别传”。西派丹学体系到底是阴阳法派,还是清修法派,哪一派可称做正传?予于《胡美成先生〈南宗丹诀释跋〉文摘录》按中略有言及,此不赘述矣。哪一派可称做正传?予于《胡美成先生〈南宗丹诀释跋〉文摘录》按中略有言及,此不赘述矣。——盛克琦识) 附录六、 《天乐集》刻印缘起 玄学之书,汗牛充栋,阅之多矣。大都秘母言子,象言辟喻,能读难懂,未免盲人摸象,误猜误拟,终不免有望洋兴叹之感。 去岁癸丑之秋,问道于潜谷老人,蒙示玄功妙谈,得心息相依要妙,并以《天乐集》借余。粗阅数章,即得眼界大开,心地开朗,方知圣圣相传之丹诀,而后继之确有人也。
Interpretation

This passage is the editor’s note and appendix explanation for Tianle Ji (Collection of Heavenly Joy), not the main body of the alchemical instructions. The gist is as follows.

Editor’s note

(Note: This explanation was supplied by Mr. Zhang Tao of Tianmen, Hubei.)

Mr. Zhang Yishang was from Zhong County, Sichuan. He had deep study in both Buddhist and Daoist learning. From his postscript to Xiandao Mantan (Casual Talk on Immortal Way) one can see he was also well versed in the Western School (Xipai) of neidan (internal alchemy)—in a few sentences he hits the vital point, like adding the pupil to a painted dragon. He even called this method “supreme celestial-origin elixir method” and clearly held it in high regard.

Yet listing it separately as a “Xipai side transmission” is probably not quite right. Xipai alchemy is mostly classed under the yin-yang line within “human-origin elixir methods,” so from that angle the elder treated Xipai quiet cultivation (solo practice without sexual dual cultivation) as “Xipai side transmission.”

Whether Xipai alchemy is fundamentally the yin-yang school or the quiet-cultivation school, and which line counts as orthodox transmission—these questions I touched on briefly in my note to Mr. Hu Meicheng’s “Postscript to Explanations of Southern School Elixir Instructions”; I will not repeat that here.

—Recognized by Sheng Keqi

Appendix 6: On the carving and printing of Tianle Ji

Books on xuanxue ( arcane learning) and the elixir path are extremely numerous; I have read quite a few myself. Most speak in hidden language and symbolic imagery—one can read through them yet still not understand, easily guessing like the blind men and the elephant, and in the end only sigh at the vastness of what one cannot grasp.

In the autumn of last year, the guichou year, I sought instruction from Elder Qian Gu. He opened up subtle talk on mysterious practice and let me grasp the essential subtlety of “mind and breath mutually relying” (xinxixiangyi), and lent me Tianle Ji to read. A rough pass through a few chapters opened my eyes and cleared my mind; only then did I know that the elixir instructions transmitted in one line from the sages truly still had successors carrying the thread.

This translation preserves the editorial tone: it discusses Zhang Yishang’s expertise, the classification of Xipai as human-origin yin-yang vs quiet “side transmission,” and the compiler’s gratitude to Qian Gu for Tianle Ji and xinxixiangyi.

《天乐集》为玄静子(海印)所着,篇幅繁多。据云全书达一百余卷,共八厚本,所得一册,仅十之一耳。但纵观此书,已赅历圣之丹诀大成,剖前人丹学所未剖,处处剥皮见肉,字字引人入圣,《参同》、《悟真》、《阴符》、《道德》之秘旨,无不彻底学所未剖,处处剥皮见肉,字字引人入圣,《参同》、《悟真》、《阴符》、《道德》之秘旨,无不彻底泄露,各种丹诀经验,无不详尽赘述,真道学之大成,丹经之指南,玄学之钥匙矣。 同志学阳子,虽余师兄弟妹,亦吾引渡师也。心息相依,非彼明示以开其端,又安能悟之深而信之笃哉!只因谊属仙交,同声相应,同气相求,凡所得无不互相切磋,互相发明,共同前进。
Interpretation

Tianle Ji (Collection of Heavenly Joy) was composed by Xuanjingzi (also known as Haiyin) and runs to an enormous length. Tradition holds that the complete work comprised more than a hundred fascicles bound in eight large volumes; what survives today is a single volume—roughly a tenth of the whole. Even so, reading through this one volume shows that the essential methods of Neidan (internal alchemy) handed down by sages of every age are gathered here. Points that earlier writers on the elixir arts left obscure are opened one by one; everywhere the root is seen directly, and every phrase aims to lead the reader toward sagehood. The deep meanings of texts such as the Cantong qi, Wuzhen Pian, Yinfu Jing, and Daode Jing are laid out with little held back; various elixir formulas and accounts of practice are described in full. It may fairly be called a crowning synthesis of Daoist learning, a compass among elixir scriptures, and a key to the profound teaching.

Tongzhi Xue Yangzi was both a fellow disciple under the same master as the author and the teacher who guided him through the door. The method of mutual reliance between mind and breath—had he not pointed out the starting place face to face, how could one have understood it so deeply or trusted it so firmly? As companions on the path of immortality cultivation, of one voice and one aspiration, whatever they gained they never failed to examine together and clarify for each other, advancing in step.

深恨好书难得而易失,末学恋假而迷真。《天乐集》者,真如天乐鸣空,足以陶情养性。爱道君子,能阅之者,有几人哉?为念云中子、七巧星等仙契谊深,爱无独专,故决意刻印数份,分赠个中之人,以公同好,共登云程。然自惭俗务繁忙,万事阻滞,既有《仙道月刊》复理之诺,又怀《天乐》刻印之愿,分身乏术,徒唤奈何。商于学阳,介以体阳,以公同好,共登云程。然自惭俗务繁忙,万事阻滞,既有《仙道月刊》复理之诺,又怀《天乐》刻印之愿,分身乏术,徒唤奈何。商于学阳,介以体阳,兴然诺之,并不厌其繁,允以从新起首,商定刻印二十份。如此好道良士,助道精神,真使我企慕殊深,感激不尽。兹于该书之首,加以目录,便于翻阅,而略述其缘起如此。 天乐子题诗: 其 一 虚空一着有谁知,玄静经探虎穴儿。天地真中旷廊哉,阴阳有极微尘耳。 相依心息生玄窍,混浊乾坤采玉芝。要妙全彰天乐集,赤条条地露真如。 其 二 有如仙乐播长空,恍入天花烂漫中。篇篇明标玄脊髓,章章可证佛音容。
Interpretation

I deeply lament that fine books are hard to come by, yet once in hand they are easily lost; lesser students cling to false methods and thereby lose the true Way. The Tianle Collection is like celestial music sounding in the void—enough to refine one’s temperament and nourish one’s original nature. Among gentlemen who love the Way, how many can truly read it through? Remembering my deep friendship with Yunzhongzi, Qiqiaoxing, and other immortals, and that love for the Way is not mine alone, I resolved to have several copies carved and printed and to give them to fellow travelers on the path, to share with those of like mind and together ascend the cloud journey. Alas, worldly duties pressed in and everything blocked the way: I had promised to revive The Immortal Way Monthly, and my heart was also bound to the wish to print The Tianle Collection—with no second self, I could only sigh in helplessness. I asked Xueyang; through Tiyang’s introduction they kept their word, took on the trouble without weariness, agreed to reorganize everything from the start, and settled on printing twenty copies. Such devotion to the Way and such sincerity in helping the Way fill me with admiration and boundless gratitude. Now I add a table of contents at the front of the book for easy browsing, and briefly record how this came about, as above.


Poem by Tianlezi, first

That single move in the void—how many recognize it?

In The Scripture of Mysterious Stillness, probing the tiger’s den is precisely where danger seeks the real.

Within the truth of Heaven and Earth, vast and empty;

at the utmost of Yin-Yang, nothing more than motes of dust.

Heart and breath rely on each other, and the mysterious aperture is born;

amid the turbid cosmos one gathers the jade fungus.

The essential subtlety is fully displayed in The Tianle Collection,

bare and plain, revealing the true face of suchness.

Second

Like immortal music spread across the long sky,

as if one stood amid a riot of heavenly flowers.

Each piece pierces to the marrow of mysterious principle;

each chapter can verify the Buddha’s voice and dharmakāya.

The homeland was always in “nowhere-at-all” (the realm of emptiness);

the face was always that of the father and elder of old.

故乡本在无何有,面目原为彰天乐集,赤条条地露真如。 其 二 有如仙乐播长空,恍入天花烂漫中。篇篇明标玄脊髓,章章可证佛音容。 故乡本在无何有,面目原为罔象公。细入微尘粗三界,除侬谁敢笑春风。 其 三 身外生身孙外公,通天巨棍耳来容。亲眨海印君知否,巧夺天工我敢穷。 故托金童重剞劂,有劳玉女促成功。丝纶不失堪垂钓,钓罢金蟆谒玉宫。 其 四 潜谷将书天乐借,天真转托体阳书。十成之八功未竟,一隅反三已尽之。 从此披星戴月读,常尊一息以心追。留蟆谒玉宫。 其 四 潜谷将书天乐借,天真转托体阳书。十成之八功未竟,一隅反三已尽之。 从此披星戴月读,常尊一息以心追。留年续命全真药,惟愿世人共尝尔。 其 五 书在人亡遗憾深,安能亲受海潮音。东亭而后先师续,西月以还后我承。 忆昔难忘潜谷子,至今恒记小天真。世情多变人心险,须谨临深履薄心。 海印山人徐颂尧 天乐
Interpretation

In the prefatory passage, a person’s true “homeland” lies originally in non-being—in the wuhe you realm (Zhuangzi’s “Land of Not-Anything,” a metaphor for where one’s original nature and the Dao-body abide). One’s “original face” was always that of Wangxiang Gong (a Neidan image for true nature: vague and formless, beyond naming). Who else could laugh freely in the spring breeze—while discerning the finest detail like dust, yet embracing the coarse breadth of the three realms—if not you?


Section Three

Outside the body, another body is born, called “Grandson Grandfather” (Sun Waigong—a Neidan figure for a second “body” born from essence and qi). It pierces heaven and earth like a great pillar; even the ears can “receive” it (a image of spirit and qi moving up and down). Have you personally verified the “Sea Seal” (the mind-as-sea, all appearances like seals upon it)? I dare pursue the craft to its limit. Thus the Golden Youth (Neidan image of yang spirit, childlike body) is entrusted to carve the text anew, and the Jade Maiden (Neidan image of yin essence and harmonizing spirit) sees the work through. The fishing line never breaks—just right for angling (a metaphor for firing times and add-and-subtract in practice); when the golden toad is hooked (image of lunar essence or signs of forming the elixir), one goes on to visit the Jade Palace (the upper dantian, the celestial court).


Section Four

Qian Valley lent out the book Tianle; Tianzhen had it retitled as Tiyang. Ten parts of effort achieved only eight—not yet complete; yet “no corner, return to three” (echoing Yijing themes: from one point, the whole pattern opens) has already exhausted the paths that needed saying. From then on one reads and recites under stars and moon, ever honoring a single breath (one inhalation-exhalation, or the breath of a single thought) as what the heart pursues. This is the Quanzhen path’s medicine for prolonging years and sustaining life—the full formula of the Complete Perfection lineage’s practice for extending life—and I only wish that people in the world would taste this sweetness with me.


Section Five

The book remains, but the person is gone; regret runs deep. How can one again hear in person the tide-like teaching (a metaphor for the master’s discourse or the sound of the Dao)? After Dongting, a prior master continued the lineage; from Xiyue downward, I received the transmission. I cannot forget Qian Guzi of old (likely a master styled Qian Valley or Qian Guzi); to this day I often recall Xiao Tianzhen (likely Tianzhenzi or the Tianzhen line). The world shifts constantly and human hearts are often treacherous; one must hold the mind of standing at the edge of deep water and treading on thin ice, cautious at every step.


Colophon: Tianle Ji, by Haoyin Shanren Xu Songyao.

集

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 10