中文 · EN

《庄子通》

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書 1 volumes 12,343 characters

About this page. The original text of 《庄子通》 (Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書, 1 volume) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 29 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

Vol. 1

庄子通 庄子通 王船山 庄子通 自叙 己未春,避兵楂林山中,麇麇之室也,众籁不喧,枯坐得以自念:念予以不能言之心,行乎不相涉之世,浮沉其侧者五年弗获已,所以应之者,薄似庄生之术,得无大疚愧?然而予固非庄生之徒也,有所不可、“两行”,不容不出乎此,因而通之,可以与心理不背;颜渊、蘧伯玉、叶公之行,叔山无趾、哀骀它之貌,凡以通吾心也。心苟为求仁之心,又奚不可? 或曰,庄生处七雄之世,是以云然。虽然,为庄生者,犹可不尔,以予通之,尤合辙焉。予之为大瘿、无服,予之居“才不才之间”,“知我 或曰,庄生处七雄之世,是以云然。虽然,为庄生者,犹可不尔,以予通之,尤合辙焉。予之为大瘿、无服,予之居“才不才之间”,“知我者谓我心忧,不知我者谓我何求”,孰为知我者哉!谓予以庄生之术,祈免于“羿之彀中”,予亦无容自解,而无能见壶子于“天壤”之示也久矣。凡庄生之说,皆可因以通君子之道,类如此。故不问庄生之能及此与否,而可以成其一说。是岁伏日,南岳卖姜翁自叙。 逍遥游
Interpretation

In the spring of the jǐwèi year, I fled the turmoil of war and took refuge in the mountains of Zha Lin. My lodging was cramped and humble, and all around me was utterly still, giving me the chance to sit quietly and reflect. I thought of how I carried a heart difficult to put into words, living in a world at odds with me, and of how I had spent five years adrift in such circumstances. I had truly had no choice. My way of dealing with worldly affairs bears some resemblance to Zhuangzi’s views. Should this not make me deeply ashamed? Yet I was never Zhuangzi’s follower. There are things I cannot accept and cannot reconcile; I could not help but come to this point. Perhaps I can draw on Zhuangzi’s thought to make sense of them without betraying my own heart. The conduct of Yan Yuan, Qu Boyu, and the Lord of Ye, and the appearances of Shushan Wuzhi and Aitai Tuo, can all help me make sense of what is within me. So long as this heart seeks benevolence, what could be wrong with that?

Some say that Zhuangzi spoke as he did because he lived in the age when the seven great states of the Warring States period fought one another. Even so, Zhuangzi need not necessarily have argued as he did. But for me, drawing on his thought to make sense of worldly affairs fits my circumstances especially well. Like the man with a great goiter, I am regarded as useless; like someone without formal robes, I am out of step with the times. I, too, find myself “between having talent and having none.” “Those who understand me say that sorrow fills my heart; those who do not understand me wonder what I am seeking.” Who truly understands me? If I say that I borrow Zhuangzi’s thought to stay beyond “Yi’s shooting range”—a metaphor for a place of danger—I cannot defend myself. As for the state that Huzǐ revealed between Heaven and Earth, I have not had the chance to witness it with my own eyes for a long time.

Most of Zhuangzi’s various sayings can be drawn on to make sense of the Way of the gentleman; that, broadly speaking, is the point. So I will not probe whether Zhuangzi himself could have reached this meaning. I present it simply as one way of speaking. Written by the Ginger Seller of Southern Mount Heng on a geng day during the summer dog days of this year.

多寡、长短、轻重、大小,皆非耦也。兼乎寡则多,兼乎短则长,兼乎轻则重,兼乎小则大,故非耦也。大既有小矣,小既可大矣,而画一小大之区,吾不知其所从生。然则大何不可使小,而困于大?小何不可使大,而小矣,小既可大矣,而画一小大之区,吾不知其所从生。然则大何不可使小,而困于大?小何不可使大,而困于小?无区可画,困亦奚生! 夫大非不能小;不能小者,势使之然也。小非不能大;不能大者,情使之然也。天下有势,“扶摇”之风是已;我心有势,“垂天”之翼是已。夫势之“厚”也生于“积”:“扶摇”之风,生物之吹息也;“垂天”之翼,一翮之轻羽也。然则虽成乎势,大之居然小也固然。
Interpretation

Quantity and magnitude, length and shortness, weight and lightness, largeness and smallness are not fixed, mutually isolated opposites. Gather small parts together and they become many; join short parts and they become long; combine light parts and they become heavy; bring small things together and they become large. Thus the large contains the small, and the small can also become large. Yet I do not know where people’s boundaries between large and small come from. If so, why should the large be unable to become small, as though confined by largeness? Why should the small be unable to become large, as though confined by smallness? If there is no fixed boundary between large and small, how could either be so confined?

The large is not incapable of becoming small; it does not become small because circumstances keep it as it is. The small is not incapable of becoming large; it does not become large because of its own conditions. In Heaven and Earth there are forces at work: for instance, the great Peng rides the “whirling updraft” as it rises. There is such a force in my mind as well: the Peng spreads its “wings that hang from the sky,” vast enough to shroud the heavens. This force gains its weight through accumulation. The “whirling updraft” is formed from the gathered breath of all things; the “wings that hang from the sky” are likewise made of feather upon feather, each light on its own. So even when a mighty force has finally taken shape, it naturally contains the small within the large.

势者,矜而已矣。矜者,目夺于成形而已矣。目夺于成形,而心怙其已然,然后困于大者,其患倍于困小。何也?心怙其已然则均,而困于小者,无成形以夺其目也。为势所驱,不“九万里”而不已;目夺于成形,而心怙其已然,然后困于大者,其患倍于困小。何也?心怙其已然则均,而困于小者,无成形以夺其目也。为势所驱,不“九万里”而不已;亦尝过“枋榆”矣,而失其“枋榆”。“扶摇”之风,不可以翔“枋榆”;“泠然”之风,不可以游乡国;章甫之美,不可以适于越;势之困尤甚于情。情有炯明而势善迷,岂不甚乎? 然则“乘天地之正”者,不惊于天地之势也;“御六气之辨”者,不骛于六气之势也;必然矣。无大则“无己”,无大则“无功”,无大则“无名”惊于天地之势也;“御六气之辨”者,不骛于六气之势也;必然矣。无大则“无己”,无大则“无功”,无大则“无名”;而又恶乎小! 虽然,其孰能之哉?知兼乎寡,而后多不讳寡也;知兼乎短,而后长不辞短也;知兼乎轻,而后重不略轻也;知兼乎小,而后大不忘小也。不忘小,乃可以忘小;忘小忘大,而“有不忘者存”,陶铸焉,斯为尧、舜矣。 齐物论
Interpretation

“Momentum” means being carried along by an external force. To be ruled by momentum is simply to have one’s attention seized by things that have already taken shape, while the mind clings to the forms already before it. In this way, one becomes trapped by what is “great”; compared with being trapped by what is “small,” the distress is doubled. Why? Because the mind clings to what has already taken shape in either case, whether it faces something great or something small. But someone caught up in small matters has no formed and imposing thing to seize the eyes.

Those driven by momentum refuse to stop unless they fly ninety thousand li into the sky. Their eyes are drawn to things already formed, and their minds cling to what they see before them; thus they are trapped by great things, and their misfortune is heavier than that of those caught up in small matters. Those pushed along by the prevailing force may once have flown beyond the “Fangyu” (a small tree), yet in doing so they lost the Fangyu. The “Fuyao” (whirlwind) that can lift the great Peng bird cannot be used to fly among the branches of the Fangyu; the gentle “Lingran” (mild breeze) that lets one glide with ease cannot be used to roam through one’s village. The beauty of a Zhangfu (an ancient ceremonial hat) may not suit the people of Yue. Being trapped by external momentum is more serious than being trapped by emotion: emotions can sometimes be clearly seen and understood, but momentum can easily make one lose one’s way. Is that not so?

Thus, one who “rides the correctness of Heaven and Earth”—that is, follows their natural patterns—is not shaken by the momentum of Heaven and Earth. One who “harnesses the transformations of the Six Energies”—Yin, Yang, wind, rain, darkness, and brightness—does not chase after the force they generate. This follows of necessity. Without an attachment to what is “great,” one can be “without self” (not clinging to the self), “without achievement” (not attached to one’s accomplishments), and “without name” (not seeking fame). If one is not shaken by the momentum of Heaven and Earth, how could one be trapped by small matters?

Yet who can truly do this? Only those who understand how to include the few can avoid setting aside the few when faced with the many; those who understand how to include the short can avoid abandoning the short when faced with the long; those who understand how to include the light can avoid overlooking it when faced with the heavy; and those who understand how to include the small can avoid forgetting it when faced with the great. Only by not forgetting the small can one truly forget one’s attachment to it. When one is attached to neither the great nor the small, something that has not been forgotten still remains. By following the transformative workings that shape the myriad things, one can attain a state like that of Yao and Shun.

论其“比竹”,论者其吹者乎!人其“比竹”,天其吹者乎!天其“比竹”,机之欻然而兴者其吹者乎!然则四海之广,万年之长,肸蚃之细,雷霆之洪!人其“比竹”,天其吹者乎!天其“比竹”,机之欻然而兴者其吹者乎!然则四海之广,万年之长,肸蚃之细,雷霆之洪,欲孤用吾口耳而吾弗能,欲孤用吾心而吾弗能;甚矣其穷也! 不言而“照之以天”,得矣。不言者,有使我不言者也;照者,有使我照者也;皆因也。欲不因彼而不为彼所使,逃之空虚,而空虚亦彼,亦将安所逃之?甚矣其穷也! 未彻于此者,游于穷,而自以为无穷,而彻者笑之已。彻于此者,游于无穷,而无往不穷。天地无往而非其气,万物无往而非其机,触之而即违,违之而即触。不得已而自以为无穷,而彻者笑之已。彻于此者,游于无穷,而无往不穷。天地无往而非其气,万物无往而非其机,触之而即违,违之而即触。不得已而言齐,我将齐物之论,而物之论亦将齐我也,可如之何! 智穷道丧,而别求一藏身之固,曰“圣人怀之”,斯可不谓择术之最工者乎?
Interpretation

If people are compared to bamboo pipes, the kind used to make musical instruments, who is it that plays them? If people are only pipes, is Heaven the player? If Heaven is also a pipe, then who sets the mechanism suddenly in motion? Yet Heaven and Earth and the Four Seas are so vast, and the years stretch on for ten thousand years: the minute things are hard to perceive, while the sound of thunder shakes the four quarters. If people are pipes, who is it that plays Heaven? If Heaven too is a pipe, who sets the mechanism in motion? I want to know the myriad things through my ears and eyes alone, but I cannot; I want to know them through my mind alone, but I cannot either. What a predicament!

It would be enough to say nothing and let the Dao of Heaven illuminate the myriad things. But if I say nothing, some force makes me keep silent; if I illuminate the myriad things, some force makes me do so. Both are drawn along by causes and conditions. I want to escape being constrained by external things, yet I cannot free myself from their control. Even if I flee into emptiness, emptiness itself is still an external thing. Where, then, can I flee? What a predicament!

Those who do not understand this wander through their troubles, yet imagine they will never reach an end. Those who do understand it laugh at them. Those who understand this wander freely in the infinite, yet know that wherever they go, there is an end. Everywhere in Heaven and Earth is Qi; everywhere among the myriad things is a mechanism of change. The moment things touch, they part; the moment they part, they touch again. Since nothing can be done about it, one can only say that the myriad things are equal. But if I try to make their views equal, their views will in turn make mine equal. What can be done about that?

When wisdom reaches its limit, the Dao is lost with it. So one seeks another secure place to hide and says, “The sage hides it in the heart.” Can this not be called the most skillful way to choose a hiding place?

虽然,吾将有辩。怀之也,其将与物相逃乎?与物相逃,则犹然与物相竞也。何也?恶屈乎物而逃之,恶随乎物而逃之,恶与物角立而无以相长而逃之。苟有恶之心,则既竞矣。逃之而无所屈,逃之而无所随,逃之而不与角立,因自以为可以相长,凡此者皆竞也。与,恶与物角立而无以相长而逃之。苟有恶之心,则既竞矣。逃之而无所屈,逃之而无所随,逃之而不与角立,因自以为可以相长,凡此者皆竞也。与之竞,则怀之机甚于其论;默塞之中,有雷霆焉。“不言之辩”,辩亦是非也;“不道之道”,道亦荣华也。其不为“风波之民”也无几,而奚以圣人为! 怀之者,“参万岁而一成纯”者也。故言人之已言,而不患其随;言人之未言,而不逢其屈;言人之不能言、不敢言,而非仅以相长。何也?已言者,未言者,不能言者,不敢言者,一万岁之中所皆备者也。可以言,可以不言;言亦怀也,不言亦怀也。是尧、舜,不非汤、武;是枝鹿,不非礼乐;仁义无端,得失无局,踌躇四顾;言亦怀也,不言亦怀也。是尧、舜,不非汤、武;是枝鹿,不非礼乐;仁义无端,得失无局,踌躇四顾,以尽其藏,而后藏身以固。唯然,则将谓之择术而奚可哉?圣人无术。 养生主 “以无厚入有间者”,不欲自王其神。
Interpretation

Even so, I must make a distinction. If you keep your intentions hidden in your heart, does that mean you can avoid contending with external things? If you try to avoid external things, you may still be struggling against them. Why? If you fear being overpowered by them, you try to escape; if you fear being drawn along by them, you try to escape; if you fear being set against them and unable to benefit one another, you try to escape as well. As long as these fears and aversions remain in your heart, you are already contending. Even if, in escaping, you are not overpowered or drawn along, are not set against external things, and tell yourself that you can thereby benefit one another, these actions still amount to contention. In contending with external things, the stratagems for winning that you harbor in your heart are more powerful than spoken debate. Even in silence, it is as though thunder roars within. “Debate without words” still distinguishes right from wrong, and “the Dao that is not spoken” may become a way to show off. In this way, you are not far from becoming someone who rises and falls with external things. How, then, can you be called a sage?

To keep one’s intentions hidden in the heart is to take part in the transformations of all ages while remaining wholly undivided. So there is no need to worry that saying what others have already said is mere conformity; no need to worry that saying what others have not yet said will get you suppressed; and no need to fear that saying what others cannot or dare not say is an attempt to outdo them. Why? What has already been said, what has not yet been said, what cannot be said, and what dare not be said have all existed within the transformations of all ages. One may speak, or one may remain silent: speaking is so, and silence is so too. To affirm Yao and Shun is not to deny Tang of Shang or Wu of Zhou; to affirm the branches and the deer is not to deny ritual and music. Benevolence and righteousness have no fixed starting point, and gain and loss have no fixed bounds. At ease, one looks in all directions, lets one’s inner reserves unfold fully, then draws oneself back and keeps to the root. How, then, can it be said that the sage has chosen a particular method? The sage has no fixed method.

The Essentials of Nurturing Life

“Put something without thickness into a space with gaps” means not treating one’s own mind and spirit as the master. Here, the metaphor of a cook carving up an ox illustrates the art of nurturing life: by following the spaces already present in things, one can reduce force and wear.

王其神者,天下亦乐得而王之;天下乐得而王之,而天下亦王。昔者汤王其神,而韦、顾、昆吾王;文王王其神,而崇侯虎、飞廉、恶来王;孟子王其神,而杨、墨王。神王于此,而毒王于彼;毒王于彼,而神不容已,益求王焉;此古之君子所以终其身于忧患而不恤其生者也。 夫“无厚”则当之者独,厚则当之者博。当之者博,所当者非间也。此古之君子所以终其身于忧患而不恤其生者也。 夫“无厚”则当之者独,厚则当之者博。当之者博,所当者非间也。间不相当,而非间者代间者与吾相拒,间者反遁于刃所不施,虽君子未有不以为忧者也,乃非无以处此矣。 “生有涯”,则神有涯,所当者亦有涯也;其他皆存而不论,因而不治,抚而不诛者也,于是而神之王也独微, 万物也,二气之毗,八风之动,七政之差,高山大川之阻,其孰能御之?故王者之兵,不多其敌;君子之教,不追其往。天下之心知无涯而可以一二靡,终其身于忧患而不与忧患牾,无他,有经而已矣, 经者裻也,裻者正也,正者无厚者也。反经而不与天下争于智数,孰谓君子之王其神为樊雉也哉? 人间世
Interpretation

When one’s spirit holds the leading position, people throughout the world will gladly establish that person as their king. Once they are willing to do so, that person can become king of the world. In the past, when Tang of Shang put his spirit in the leading position, the rulers of Wei, Gu, Kunwu, and other states each claimed kingship for themselves. The same was true in the time of King Wen of Zhou, when Chong Houhu, Feilian, and E Lai each claimed kingship; and in the time of Mencius, when Yang Zhu and Mo Di each proclaimed their own Way. One’s spirit may hold the leading position here, while harm runs rampant elsewhere. When harm runs rampant elsewhere, the spirit cannot be at peace and must strive all the harder to gain the leading position. This is why the gentlemen of antiquity worried throughout their lives and gave no thought to their own safety.

What is thin and lacks substance can be borne in only one place; what is solid and substantial can be borne in many places. When there are many places able to bear it, its reach is no longer confined to a single corner. This is why the gentlemen of antiquity worried throughout their lives and gave no thought to their own safety.

What is thin and lacks substance can be borne in only one place; what is solid and substantial can be borne in many places. When there are many places able to bear it, its reach is no longer confined to a single corner. When people are at odds, those who had no part in the matter may instead take the place of those involved and set themselves against me, while those involved retreat to a place beyond the reach of a blade. Even a gentleman cannot help worrying about this, yet there is a way to deal with such a situation.

Human life has its limits, as do the range of the spirit’s attention and the matters one can take responsibility for. As for the rest, let things be without comment: follow their own course, neither governing nor punishing them. In this way, the range over which the spirit can hold sway is kept within bounds.

The transformations of the myriad things, the mutual influence of Yin and Yang, the winds blowing from the eight directions, the irregular movements of the sun, moon, and five planets, and the barriers formed by high mountains and great rivers—who could possibly stop all of these? Thus, when a king wages war, he does not treat everyone as an enemy; when a gentleman teaches, he does not pursue past wrongs. The thoughts of people throughout the world are without limit, yet they can be guided by one or two principles. A gentleman worries throughout his life, yet is not led by his worries; the reason is that he has a constant Way to serve as his measure.

What is called a Jing (classic) is a main line; a main line is the right Way; and the right Way means favoring no one and clinging to no single position. Returning to the right Way and competing with no one in the world over cleverness or tactics, who could say that a gentleman lets his spirit hold the leading position only to be trapped like a bird in a cage?

“Adjustment of Life” (Renjian Shi)

耳目受物,而心治物。“殉耳目内通,而,裻者正也,正者无厚者也。反经而不与天下争于智数,孰谓君子之王其神为樊雉也哉? 人间世 耳目受物,而心治物。“殉耳目内通,而外于心知”,能不“师心”者也。师心不如师古,师古不如师天,师天不如师物,何也?将欲涉于“人间世”,心者所以涉,非所涉也。古者前之所涉,非予涉也。天者唯天能以涉,非予所以涉也。今予所涉者,物而已矣,则何得不以物为师也耶?卫君之暴,楚齐之交,蒯聩之逆,皆师也,而天下何不可师者哉? 抑尝流观天下而慨人事之难矣。庸人不以物为师也耶?卫君之暴,楚齐之交,蒯聩之逆,皆师也,而天下何不可师者哉? 抑尝流观天下而慨人事之难矣。庸人之前,直说拙于曲说;忮人之前,讽言危于正言。“不材之木”,无故而受伐者亦数数然。“无用之用”,亦用也,用斯危矣。夫所患于师心者,挟心而与天下游也。如使师物者挟物而与天下游,则物亦门也,门亦毒也。阖门而内固其心,辟门而外保于物,皆有泰至之忧。
Interpretation

The ears and eyes receive things from the outside world, and the mind processes them. To follow what the ears and eyes perceive in order to observe what is within, while not letting inner preconceptions govern one’s understanding, is what it means not to take one’s own mind as one’s teacher. Taking the mind as one’s teacher is not as good as taking the ancients as one’s teacher; taking the ancients as one’s teacher is not as good as taking Heaven as one’s teacher; and taking Heaven as one’s teacher is not as good as taking the myriad things as one’s teacher. Why? To pass through the “human world”—the life of society—the mind is merely a tool for dealing with worldly affairs; it is not the road one must travel. The road the ancients traveled is not the same as the one I travel. Only Heaven can accord with the Way of Heaven; this is not something I can accomplish by my own power. Now, all I have before me are the myriad things. How could I not take them as my teacher? The tyranny of the Lord of Wei, the dealings between Chu and Qi, and Kuai Kui’s rebellion can all serve as lessons. What in the world, then, could not be learned from?

I have surveyed the world far and wide and sighed at how difficult human circumstances truly are. Ordinary people find tactful words easier to accept than plain speech; for those filled with resentment and rivalry, indirect remonstrance is more likely to bring danger than direct advice. Even a “useless tree”—one that seems good for nothing and cannot be made into an implement—is often cut down for no reason. And the “usefulness of uselessness,” the benefit of seeming useless and thereby preserving oneself, is still a kind of usefulness; once that usefulness becomes apparent, it too may bring danger.

The problem with taking one’s own mind as one’s teacher is that one engages with the world while carrying fixed preconceptions. Even if one takes the myriad things as one’s teacher, approaching the world with fixed views will make them into gateways that bind us, and those gateways may bring misfortune. Closing the gate and guarding the heart brings its own troubles; opening it and relying on the myriad things brings troubles as well.

韩非知说之难,而以说诛;扬雄知白之不可守,而以玄死。其用心殊而害均,则胡不寻其所以害乎?履危世,交乱人,悲身之不幸而非不材,斯岂可以计较为吉凶之准则哉?有道于此,言之甚易,行之不劳,而古今之能知者鲜。故李斯叹东门之犬,陆机,悲身之不幸而非不材,斯岂可以计较为吉凶之准则哉?有道于此,言之甚易,行之不劳,而古今之能知者鲜。故李斯叹东门之犬,陆机怨华亭之鹤,而龙逄、比干不与焉。无他,虚与不虚而已矣。 天下皆不足为实之累,而实填其“生白”之“室”以迷闷而不知“吉祥”之“止”者,生死已尔,祸福已尔,毁誉已尔,口口已尔。此八实者,填心之积也,古今之奉为师而不敢违者也。八者虚而天下蔑不虚矣,故物皆可游也。规规然念物之可畏而避之,物不胜避矣。物不胜避,而况天之生杀乎?“何暇至于说生而恶死”?龙逄、比干所以与不材之木同至今存也。 德充符 德人而矜有德之容,为容人而已矣;德人而矜德之无容,为无容之人而已比干所以与不材之木同至今存也。 德充符
Interpretation

Han Fei understood how difficult it was to persuade others, yet he was killed because he tried. Yang Xiong knew how hard it was to preserve his integrity, yet he died because he wrote the Taixuan. Their intentions differed, but they suffered the same kind of disaster. Why not investigate where such disasters come from? To live in a dangerous age and associate with people amid turmoil, to grieve over one’s misfortune yet refuse to see it as the result of one’s own lack of ability—is it reasonable to treat such experiences as a standard for judging good and bad fortune? There is a principle that is easy to explain and takes no effort to put into practice, yet few people throughout history have truly understood it. Thus, as Li Si faced execution, he lamented that he could no longer take his yellow dog hunting at the eastern gate; and before his execution, Lu Ji longed to hear the cranes of Huating. Long Pang and Bi Gan, by contrast, had no such regrets. The reason is simply whether their hearts were open and free of attachment.

Things in the world are not, in themselves, a real burden. Yet the thought that they are real fills the chamber of “born brightness”—the still and empty mind in which clarity arises—leaving people confused and benighted, unable to let “good fortune”—the way of ease and harmony—take up residence. So it is with life and death, misfortune and fortune, praise and blame, and every kind of dispute and contention. These eight attachments to what is real pile up in the heart; throughout history, people have revered them as standards and dared not go against them. See through these eight attachments, and there is nothing in the world that cannot be seen through; then all things can be roamed among freely. If one is always anxiously imagining that external things are frightening and trying to avoid them, one will find there are too many to escape. And if external things cannot all be avoided, how much less can one escape the changes of life and death between Heaven and Earth? How could one then have the leisure to cling to life and fear death? Long Pang and Bi Gan remain remembered to this day like trees beyond anyone’s control precisely because they were not burdened by external things.

The Sign of Virtue Fulfilled (De Chong Fu): If a person of De (Virtue/Power) boasts of the appearance of having De, that is merely an outward pose. If a person of De boasts of showing no outward signs of De, that too is simply making a pose of “showing nothing.”

德人而矜有德之容,为容人而已矣;德人而矜德之无容,为无容之人而已矣。“道与之貌”,貌一道也;“天与之形”,形一天也。“死生亦大矣,而不得与之变”;故生于道,死于道;生于天,死于天;道无不貌,貌无非道;天无不形,形无非天。然则生于形,死于形,生于貌,死于貌,死生可遗,而兹未尝与之相离也。 以道殉容,曼人而已矣。以容殉生,靡人而已矣。以道忘容,忘道而已矣。介者,无趾者,无脤、大瘿者,且不丧其全德,况其不尔者乎? “忘其所不忘”,而以殉形,则人知其妄。若夫“不忘其所不忘”,而形与貌在焉,天之所以成,成之所以大,浑外内,合精粗,凝道契天,以不丧其所受。夫圣人者,岂得以詹詹于形貌之末而疵之也哉?”,而形与貌在焉,天之所以成,成之所以大,浑外内,合精粗,凝道契天,以不丧其所受。夫圣人者,岂得以詹詹于形貌之末而疵之也哉? 悲哉!卫灵公之愚也,得无脤者而视全人之脰肩肩。悲哉!齐桓公之愚也,得大瘿者而观全人之脰肩肩。则使之二君者,以巍冠大绅、高趾扬眉之土,怀溪壑,腹刀剑,而得其心,抑将视天下容之不盛者,虽有德,若将浼焉,恐去之不夙矣。
Interpretation

If a person with De boasts of having the appearance of De, that person is merely concerned with outward show. If a person with De boasts that they do not care about outward appearances, they have simply made “not caring about appearances” their outward show. “The Dao gives people their appearance”: appearance itself is also Dao. “Heaven gives people their form”: form itself is also Heaven. Death and life are great matters, yet they cannot alter them. Thus life and death both arise from Dao and return to Dao; they both arise from Heaven and return to Heaven. Dao is everywhere, and every appearance is a manifestation of Dao; Heaven is everywhere, and every form is a manifestation of Heaven. Since this is so, we are born into form and die in form; born into appearance and die in appearance. One may cease to dwell on life and death, yet never leave Dao or Heaven.

To use Dao in pursuit of a particular appearance is merely to adorn one’s outward self. To value appearance more than life is to be enslaved by outward show. To deliberately seek Dao by forgetting appearance is to forget the true Dao. Even those whose feet have been cut off, who have no toes or lips, or who bear great tumors have not lost the completeness of De. How much less have those whose bodies are whole!

People know that it is absurd to forget what should not be forgotten while setting their minds on the body. If one can remain mindful of the Dao-heart that must not be forgotten, while letting body and appearance exist naturally, this is how Heaven brings all things to completion and allows them to flourish: the inner and outer become one, the subtle and the manifest flow into each other, and all gather in Dao and accord with Heaven, without losing the nature bestowed on them by Heaven. How could a sage fixate on such minor matters as outward appearance and find fault with them?

How lamentable that Duke Ling of Wei was so foolish: on seeing a man without lips, he stared at the necks of people whose bodies were whole, thinking their necks too thin and short. How lamentable that Duke Huan of Qi was so foolish: on seeing a man with a great tumor, he too stared at the necks of people whose bodies were whole, thinking their necks too thin and short. Suppose the two rulers favored only those who wore tall hats and broad belts, and held their heads high with raised brows; if these people harbored greed and concealed the treachery of daggers in their bellies, yet suited the rulers’ tastes, then the rulers would probably think that anyone in the world whose appearance was less than striking—even if they possessed De—might somehow stain them, and would likely avoid such people at all costs.

故符者,德之充也;非德不充,非充不符。不充而符,谓之窃符;不德而充,谓之枵充。德之不充,是谓替德;充之不符,是谓儳充。“道与之貌”,貌以肖道;“天与之形”,形以酬天。宾宾于名闻之间,而数变其天形,则胡不内保而外不荡,逍遥于“羿之彀中”,以弗丧吾天也乎?故其为容,非容人之容也;其为无容,非无容人之无容也;以德征符,德无非符;以符合德,符无非德。能知天下之以吾天也乎?故其为容,非容人之容也;其为无容,非无容人之无容也;以德征符,德无非符;以符合德,符无非德。能知天下之以形貌为货,而不知其为符也,又恶知德哉? 大宗师 “踵息”者,始教也,而至人之道尽矣。“寥天一”,无可人也。自踵而上,无非天也,无非一也,然而已寥矣。
Interpretation

Thus, outward signs—forms and expressions that naturally reveal inner virtue—are the result of virtue becoming full. Without virtue, the inner life cannot be full; when the inner life is not full, the outward signs cannot be genuine. When the inner life is unfilled yet appears to accord with virtue, this is called “stealing the signs” (qie fu). When there is no virtue but one appears full, this is called “hollow fullness” (xiao chong), fullness in appearance alone. When virtue is not full, this is called “virtue’s decline” (ti de). When outward expression does not correspond to the inner life, this is called “mismatched fullness” (chan chong), a fullness out of proportion.

“The Dao gives a person their countenance,” so the countenance takes on a form that accords with the Dao. “Heaven gives a person their body,” so the body responds to its nature. If you are always caught up in reputation and repeatedly alter the nature of the form you were born with, why not preserve your nature within and keep it undisturbed from without? Then you could remain at ease, as if “within Yi’s bowshot” (Yi’s range with a drawn bow, a metaphor for being in danger), and not lose your nature.

Therefore, to have a countenance does not mean having one that caters to the world, and to have no countenance does not mean deliberately adopting an appearance at odds with convention. Test outward signs by virtue, and virtue will manifest everywhere as a sign; confirm virtue through signs, and every sign will embody virtue. Who can understand that all things under Heaven exist by relying on their own nature? Therefore, to have a countenance does not mean having one that caters to the world, and to have no countenance does not mean deliberately adopting an appearance at odds with convention. Test outward signs by virtue, and virtue will manifest everywhere as a sign; confirm virtue through signs, and every sign will embody virtue. If you know only to treat one’s appearance as something to trade and pursue, yet do not know that it is evidence of inner virtue, how could you understand virtue?

The Great Ancestor says: “‘Heel breathing’ (gen xi)—deep, profound breathing, as if the breath reached the heels—is an elementary teaching, yet it already contains the essential principles of the Dao cultivated by the realized person. ‘Making the heavens empty and one’ (liao tian yi) means not allowing external things to enter the heart-mind. From the heels upward, everywhere is nature and everywhere is undivided wholeness; yet the heart-mind is already empty and unobstructed.”

“逆寡”、“雄成”、“谟士”,皆“喉息”也。“悦生”、“恶死”、“出欣”、“入距”,皆“喉息”也。“乐通物”、“有亲”、“天时”,皆“喉息”也。“刑”、“礼”、“知”、“德”,皆“喉息”也。“好恶”,皆“喉息”也。引而至于踵,寡亦逆,成亦雄,士亦谟,生亦说,死亦恶,出亦欣,入亦距,通物亦乐,亲亦有,时亦天,刑亦体,礼亦翼,知息”也。引而至于踵,寡亦逆,成亦雄,士亦谟,生亦说,死亦恶,出亦欣,入亦距,通物亦乐,亲亦有,时亦天,刑亦体,礼亦翼,知亦时,德亦循,好亦好,恶亦恶;以死殉数者而特不以喉。于是而寥矣,不可度矣,不可竭矣,不可以功功,不可以名名,参万岁,秶万物,非天非一,其孰足以胜此哉? 天下好深,而独浅其天机,于是淫刑而侈礼,阳慕德而数用知,喜怒好恶,以义为朋,而皆以深其嗜欲。自喉以下,嗜欲据之,而仅余其喉以受天,而即出之,此古今之通患,言道者莫之能舍也。 夫天虚故受,天实故撰。受之而不得出,非天非一,则若哽于膺,而快于一吐。撰之而不足,非天非一,则改易出之,此古今之通患,言道者莫之能舍也。
Interpretation

“Reversal in smallness,” “masculine achievement,” and “the plans of the scholar” are all merely sounds of breathing in the throat. “Delight in life,” “aversion to death,” “ease in breathing out,” and “resistance in breathing in” are likewise merely sounds of breathing in the throat. So too are “joy in connecting with things,” “affection,” “the seasons of Heaven,” as well as punishment, ritual, knowledge, De, and likes and dislikes.

Guide this breath down to the heels, and you will discover that even in smallness there is a tendency toward reversal, that achievement can be vigorous, and that scholars can make plans. Delight in life and aversion to death, the ease of breathing out and the resistance of breathing in, the joy of connecting with all things, affection, the changing seasons of Heaven, and even punishment, ritual, wisdom, De, and likes and dislikes—all have their own natural functions. Those who live and die in accordance with nature’s patterns do not rely only on breathing through the throat. In this way, the mind becomes empty and unobstructed, beyond measure and without end. Achievement cannot be measured by achievement, nor can reputation define reputation. Such a person joins with the ten thousand years and abides with all things, constrained neither by “Heaven” nor by “the One.” What power could surpass such a state?

People under Heaven delight in what is profound, yet they alone regard their own inborn nature as shallow. Thus punishment is excessive and ritual overelaborate; they profess admiration for De, yet constantly resort to cleverness. They also make likes, dislikes, joy, anger, and moral principles the basis of their relationships, with the result that their desires grow ever deeper. Below the throat, the body is occupied by desires; only the throat seems left to receive the breath of nature, but that breath is immediately breathed out again. This has been a failing from antiquity to the present, and even those who speak of the Dao find it difficult to escape.

Heaven is empty, and so can contain; Heaven is full, and so can transform, bring forth, and order the ten thousand things. If one only receives and cannot release, one is out of accord with nature and with “the One”—that is, the Dao in its undivided unity—like something lodged in the chest that can be relieved only by being spat out. If one lacks the capacity to transform and order things, one is out of accord with nature and with “the One”; one will change, replace, and produce something else instead. This, too, has been a failing from antiquity to the present, and even those who speak of the Dao find it difficult to escape.

夫天虚故受,天实故撰。受之而不得出,非天非一,则若哽于膺,而快于一吐。撰之而不足,非天非一,则改易君臣,颠倒表里,以支其所不逮,而冀速应之以无惭。呜呼!知天之虚,知天之实者,古今鲜矣。 若然者,非他求之也;即其所为息者,引而至于踵,无所闻也,无所缺也。孰使而闻“副墨”而若惊,闻“雒诵”而若酲,闻“瞻明”而若奔,闻“聂许”而若饫,闻“需役”而若嘬于蚊蚋,闻“於讴”而若厉风之激于窐乎?以嗜欲济嗜欲,不足则援道以继之,天下皆浅而天丧其机,于是而天亦戚矣。阖户以求人之入,而人莫入也,而天亦枵矣。天戚则亦无乎不戚,于是而愀傈荧謵,终其世以为喉,任忧患而彻于死。天枵,则所为者皆枵也,枵而撄之,未有得宁者也。然则天下之好深,而得深之患,,终其世以为喉,任忧患而彻于死。天枵,则所为者皆枵也,枵而撄之,未有得宁者也。然则天下之好深,而得深之患,皆浅而已矣。 引而之于踵,至矣。虽至于“寥天一”,不能舍此以为救也。“犯人之形”以百年,无不取诸其藏而用之,而后知天一之果寥也。 应帝王
Interpretation

The sky must be empty to receive; it must be full to act. If it receives something but cannot transform it outward, then unless it follows nature and returns to unity, it will feel like something lodged in the chest, something that must be brought up and expelled. If it acts yet still feels inadequate, then unless it follows nature and returns to unity, it will reorder ruler and minister, reverse inner and outer, and try every means to make up for what is lacking, all the while expecting a quick response and feeling not the slightest shame. Alas! From ancient times to the present, so few have truly understood the Dao of emptiness and fullness.

A person of this kind need not seek anything outside. They need only guide the breath of their ordinary breathing down to the heels, and the requirement is fulfilled. At this point, it is as though nothing is heard in the ears, and nothing is lacking. What makes people grow alarmed when they hear of “Fu Mo” (written records), grow dull as if drunk when they hear of “Luo Song” (repeated recitation), rush about as if in haste when they hear of “Zhan Ming” (clear discernment), feel as though they have eaten their fill when they hear of “Nie Xu” (listening closely and responding), feel as though bitten by mosquitoes when they hear of “Xu Yi” (waiting and standing by for orders), and surge with agitation like a gale rushing into a hollow when they hear of “Yu Ou” (singing and answering in song)?

One desire is used to satisfy another, yet it still seems insufficient; so people enlist the Dao to keep satisfying their desires. As a result, everyone in the world remains on the surface, while their inborn capacities are lost, and even the Dao of Heaven seems to grieve. They close the door, hoping someone will come in, but no one ever does, and their hearts become empty. Once sorrow enters the heart, everything seems sorrowful; they spend the whole day fearful and unsettled, and all their lives feel as if something were lodged in their throats, carrying their distress until death. When the heart is empty, everything one does seems empty as well. Facing the world with emptiness brings peace to no one. Thus people everywhere pursue what is profound, only to be burdened by profundity in the end; all of it, after all, remains superficial.

Guiding the breath down to the heels is the essential method of cultivation. Even upon reaching “Liao Tian Yi” (the clear, open state of unity with the Dao of Heaven), one must not abandon this point in search of liberation. To live a hundred years in human form, one must draw upon the Jing and Qi stored within oneself. Only then can one understand that the state in which the Dao of Heaven returns to unity is indeed clear, open, and boundless.

天下皆“未始出吾宗”者也,而骇于物之多有者,事至而冁然,事至而瞿然,事至而荧然,事至而的然,谓是芸芸者皆出吾宗之外者也。于是以为迎之而可无失,则“藏仁以要人”;于是而以为有主而可以相治,则“以己而出经”;于是以为悉体之而可尽,则“劳形怵心”,以来天下之求。凡此者,慕圣人之功而不知其所以功者也。 夫天下未始出吾宗,而恒不自知。苟知其不出吾宗,则至静而“不震”,其机为“杜德”;至深而“不波”, 夫天下未始出吾宗,而恒不自知。苟知其不出吾宗,则至静而“不震”,其机为“杜德”;至深而“不波”,其机为“踵发”;至安而容,至敛而涵,其机为“渊”;皆以不丧吾宗而受天下以不出,然后可“流”,可“靡”,无物不在道之中,而万变不足以骇之。
Interpretation

All things under heaven have never been separate from what we call the Source—their root and origin. Yet people are often unsettled by the countless forms things take. When events arise, they may feel joy, fear, confusion, or become attached to fixed judgments about them. They then imagine that the myriad things lie outside the Source. Some believe that by accommodating others they can avoid making mistakes, so they keep benevolence in their hearts to win other people’s approval. Others believe that having their own views enables them to govern the people, so they make rules according to their own opinions. Still others believe that they can master everything by personally understanding every matter. The result is that they exhaust their bodies and burden their minds with anxiety, trying to meet the demands of everyone under heaven. All these approaches admire the accomplishments of sages without understanding how sages achieve them.

All things under heaven have never been separate from the Source, yet people have never recognized this. If they understood that the myriad things never depart from the Source, they could become still and remain unshaken. The key to this state is to gather in De (Virtue/Power) and not display it outwardly. The key to a mind that is deep and undisturbed is to let its inner vitality arise naturally from the Source. The key to being settled and generous, restrained and reserved, is to be deep and expansive like an abyss. Only by never losing the Source, and by receiving all things under heaven with the understanding that nothing departs from it, can one flow with circumstances and change along with things. Everything is within the Dao (the Way); however many changes there may be, none can cause alarm.

虽然,所谓宗者,必有宗矣。无以求之,其唯天乎!我之与天子,皆天之子,则天子无以异;天子之与天下,皆天之子也,则天下无以异。道者归于道而已矣,德者归于德而已矣,功者归于功而已矣,名者乎!我之与天子,皆天之子,则天子无以异;天子之与天下,皆天之子也,则天下无以异。道者归于道而已矣,德者归于德而已矣,功者归于功而已矣,名者归于名而已矣,利者归于利而已矣,嗜欲者归于嗜欲而已矣。道亦德也,德亦功也,功亦名也,名亦利也,利亦欲也,欲亦道也。道不出吾宗,虽有贤智,莫之能逾;欲不出吾宗,虽有奸桀,莫之能诡。不骇天下,则不患吾之寡。吾无寡而天下无多,不谓之一也不能。 “藏天下于天下”,而皆藏于吾之宗。名焉而不为尸,谋焉而不为府,事焉而不为任,知焉而不为主;尸焉而不为名,府焉而不为谋,任焉而不为事,主焉而不为知。抑滔天之洪水,躬放伐之烈而不为尸,谋焉而不为府,事焉而不为任,知焉而不为主;尸焉而不为名,府焉而不为谋,任焉而不为事,主焉而不为知。抑滔天之洪水,躬放伐之烈名,帝自此帝,王自此王,未始出吾宗,而何屑屑以凿为! 骈拇
Interpretation

Even so, whenever people discuss the “root of the lineage”—that is, the fundamental principle—there must be a root at the foundation. If we do not seek it outside ourselves, the root is probably to be found in the Way of Heaven. The Son of Heaven and I were both born of Heaven, so there is no essential difference between us. The Son of Heaven and the people of the world were likewise born of Heaven, so there is no essential difference between ruler and people.

The Dao belongs to the Dao, De to De, achievement to achievement, reputation to reputation, profit to profit, and desires to desires; each has its proper place. The Dao, De, achievement, reputation, profit, and desire connect with one another and follow one another in layers, yet in the end none departs from the root. The Dao does not go beyond our root: even the wise and perceptive cannot pass beyond it. Desire does not go beyond our root: even the treacherous and domineering cannot act against it. So long as we do not disturb the world, there is no need to worry that we stand alone and weak. Since I am not alone, there is nothing in the world that is especially abundant or separate from me. Perhaps this is what is called “the One.”

“Store the world within the world”: all things, too, are stored within the root we share. One may hold an honored position without being constrained by it; take part in planning without making oneself a storehouse of schemes; undertake affairs without seeing oneself as their master; and use knowledge without claiming knowledge as one’s own. Put another way, even if one serves as the person in charge, there is no need to cling to status; even if one devises plans, there is no need to make oneself their center; even if one undertakes affairs, there is no need to regard oneself as their master; and even if one possesses knowledge, there is no need to claim it as one’s own.

Even when governing the great floods or personally taking part in a major undertaking such as punishing a tyrant, one does not thereby regard oneself as the sovereign power. One plans without making oneself the center of the plans, carries out affairs without claiming mastery over them, and uses knowledge without laying claim to it. This is how an emperor comes to be; the emperor’s Way, too, has never departed from the root. Why, then, take pains to carve and polish, or to contrive deliberately?

“Webbed Toes” (the title of a chapter in the Zhuangzi, referring to toes that have grown together).

体之所本无,用之所不待,无端而生,恃焉而保之,得则喜,失则忧,是之谓骈枝赘疣之不可决也。 非曾史而为曾史,非有虞氏而为有虞氏,非伯夷而为伯夷,“色取”者也,“助长”者也。以仁义为彼而视之听之,则不知名实之合离。 自闻则不昧其声,自见则不昧其形,果且为仁义,虞氏,非伯夷而为伯夷,“色取”者也,“助长”者也。以仁义为彼而视之听之,则不知名实之合离。 自闻则不昧其声,自见则不昧其形,果且为仁义,则指之五、掌之二而可决邪,而可龁邪?非但恶泣而畏啼也。 知仁之不远,知义之内,自奔其命而非奔仁义,伯夷以之馁而不怨,何啼泣之有哉!所恶于残生损性者,以其继之以啼泣也。 马蹄 马不衔勒,将焉用马?木不斫治,将焉用木?不为牺尊,将焉用朴?不为珪璋,将焉用玉?不取仁义,将焉用道?“踶跂好知,争归于利”者,圣人之过,圣人尸之而不辞。 知圣人之为道,任过而不辞,则所道?“踶跂好知,争归于利”者,圣人之过,圣人尸之而不辞。 知圣人之为道,任过而不辞,则所以酬圣人之德而不敢昧也,将若何乎! 胠箧
Interpretation

The foundation on which people rely is inherently without function; when it comes into play, it needs no support from external things. It comes into being without cause, yet people depend on it and preserve it. They rejoice when they gain it and grieve when they lose it. This attachment, which they cannot let go of, is like an extra branch or a superfluous growth.

People who are not like Zeng Shen or Shi Qiu try to present themselves as though they were. Those who are not rulers like the Youyu clan pretend to be; those who are not Bo Yi put on the appearance of Bo Yi. This is to display benevolence and righteousness outwardly, and to drive and force oneself deliberately. When benevolence and righteousness are treated as external things, and used to observe and listen to the world, one can no longer tell whether names match realities.

Only hearing something with one’s own ears keeps one from mistaking a sound; only seeing something with one’s own eyes keeps one from mistaking a form. If one is truly to judge whether benevolence and righteousness, the Youyu clan, and Bo Yi are genuine or false, can one decide and hold firm to that judgment merely because a hand has five fingers and there are two hands? What people dislike is not merely weeping and wailing themselves.

When one understands that benevolence is not far away and that righteousness lies within oneself, one follows one’s own nature in life rather than acting in pursuit of the names “benevolence” and “righteousness.” Bo Yi starved to death without resentment; what was there to lament? What people abhor is harm to life and injury to one’s nature, precisely because such harm is often accompanied by grief and tears.

Horses’ Hooves

If a horse is not fitted with a bit and bridle, what use can it be put to? If wood is not cut and shaped, what use can it be put to? If wood is not made into a ritual wine vessel, why preserve its original form? If jade is not carved into ritual objects such as a gui or zhang tablet, why use it? If benevolence and righteousness are not put to use, why speak of the Dao? The customs of “exhausting one’s ingenuity to show off cleverness and competing to pursue profit” are faults caused by the sages. The sages should take responsibility for them and not evade it.

If one understands that the sages put their way into practice, yet is willing to accept the faults this caused without evasion, how can one repay the sages’ kindness without failing them?

Rifling Chests

圣人,不可死者也;大盗,不可止者也。盗既不可止矣,圣人果不可死矣。知圣人之不可死,大盗之不可止,无可奈何而安之以道。犹将延颈举趾,指贤智为名以殉其私利而欲以止盗,其不为大乱也鲜矣。 知其玄同,以生其道法,则圣人日生,大盗日弭,孰标提仁义以为“盗竽”也哉? 在宥 人心之动,有可知者,有不可知者。不可知者,人心之天也。治天下者,恒治其可知,而不能治其不可知。 治其可知者,人心则既已动矣,乃从而加之治:以“圣知”加诸“桁杨”,以“仁义”加诸“桎梏”,以曾、史加诸桀、跖,不相人而只以相抵,不谓之“撄人心”也不得。所以然者,治其可知,名之所得生,法之所得施,功之所得着,以曾、史加诸桀、跖,不相人而只以相抵,不谓之“撄人心”也不得。所以然者,治其可知,名之所得生,法之所得施,功之所得着,则不必有圣知、仁义、曾史之实,而固可号于天下曰,吾既已治之矣。 若夫不可知者,无实焉有名?无象焉有法?无败焉有功?名法功之迹隐,故为侈天下者之所不事。
Interpretation

Sages cannot ultimately be eliminated, and great thieves cannot ultimately be stopped completely. Since great thieves cannot be stopped, sages cannot be eliminated either. Knowing that sages cannot be eliminated and great thieves cannot be stopped, one can only let things follow their natural course, remain at ease, and act in accordance with the Dao (the fundamental pattern by which nature operates). Otherwise, people will still stretch their necks and rise onto their toes to promote worthy and wise people as a pretext for seeking private gain, while hoping to use this method to stop thieves. It is rare for such efforts not to lead to great disorder.

When people understand that all things are fundamentally connected, and from this understanding derive principles that accord with the Dao, sages will gradually flourish and great thieves will gradually subside. At that point, who will hold up benevolence and righteousness as instruments for enticing people into disorder?

Letting Be

Some activities of the human mind can be understood; others cannot. What cannot be understood is the mind’s inborn nature. Those who govern the world often govern only what can be understood, while being unable to govern what cannot.

With regard to the parts of the mind that can be understood, rulers impose restraints only after thoughts have already arisen: they attach so-called “sage wisdom” to instruments of punishment, “benevolence and righteousness” to shackles, and the virtuous Zeng Shen and Shi Qiu to the tyrant Jie and the great thief Zhi. They do not bring the two sides into harmony; they merely make one side suppress the other. It would be hard to deny that this disturbs people’s minds. This happens because governing what can be known gives rulers labels to establish, laws to enforce, and achievements to display. Thus, even without the actual qualities of sage wisdom, benevolence and righteousness, or the virtue of people like Zeng Shen and Shi Qiu, they can still proclaim to the world, “I have brought good order.”

As for what cannot be understood, it has no concrete traces—so what labels could there be? It has no visible form—so what laws could there be? It admits no failure—so what achievements could there be? The traces of labels, laws, and achievements remain hidden and unseen, so those who boast of their success in governing will not pursue it.

然而人心之未起,则无所撄也;于不可知而早服之,治身而已矣。慎乎其喜,天下不淫;慎乎其怒,天下不贼;喜怒守其知,天下不骛。“至阳之原”,无物不昭;“至阴之原”,无物不藏。无物不昭,不昭物也;无物不藏,不藏物也。物各复根,其性自正;物固自生,其情自达;物莫自知,漠然而止其淫贼。此圣知之彻,而曾史之所以自靖也。自靖焉,则天下靖矣。 天地 为万物之所取定者,“大小长短修远”各有成数,无他,己所见者止于有形,下靖矣。 天地 为万物之所取定者,“大小长短修远”各有成数,无他,己所见者止于有形,因而存之;得之而喜,失之而怒,徇其成形,而不顾天下之然与不然,此古今之大病也。
Interpretation

Before a thought has arisen in the mind, it is not moved by external things. As for matters that cannot yet be known, gathering the spirit early and following what comes naturally is simply a way of cultivating oneself. If people are cautious about joy, they will not give themselves over to excess; if they are cautious about anger, they will not harm one another. When both joy and anger are governed by reason, people will not act recklessly.

The “source of utmost Yang” (the root of Yang energy) illuminates all things; the “source of utmost Yin” (the root of Yin energy) enfolds all things. To illuminate all things does not mean laying everything bare for all to see; to enfold all things does not mean hiding everything away. Each thing returns to its root, and its nature naturally becomes upright. Things grow of their own accord, and their dispositions naturally unfold. They do not deliberately seek self-knowledge; they simply remain still and put a stop to excessive indulgence and harmful conduct. This is the wisdom of the sage brought to full understanding, and the reason Zeng Can and Shi Qiu—Zengzi and Shi Yu, regarded in ancient times as men of upright character—were able to keep true to themselves. When one’s own person is settled, the world is settled as well.

Heaven and Earth are the foundation from which all things take their models and receive their forms. All things have their own measure of size, length, height, and distance. This is because people’s understanding stops at what has form: they take what they see before them to be the whole and remain content within those bounds.

Heaven and Earth are the foundation from which all things take their models and receive their forms. All things have their own measure of size, length, height, and distance. This is because people’s understanding stops at what has form, so they regard these things as fixed. They rejoice when they gain and grow angry when they lose, pursuing only forms that have already taken shape. They pay no heed to the way things in the world actually are, or to whether their own judgments accord with reality. This is the greatest failing of all, from ancient times to the present.

无形者,非无形也,特己不见也。知无形之有形,无状之有状,则“大小长短修远”已不能定,而况于万物乎?无形之且有形矣,无状之且有状矣。静而有动,动留而生物,物生于俄顷之间,而其先皆有故也,一留而形成矣。知此,则能弗守其静,以听其动乎?静不倚则动不匮,其动必正有状矣。静而有动,动留而生物,物生于俄顷之间,而其先皆有故也,一留而形成矣。知此,则能弗守其静,以听其动乎?静不倚则动不匮,其动必正,其留必成,其生必顺。天地之生物,与圣人之起事,一而已矣。 心虽刳也,刳其取定之心,而必有存焉者存。“见晓”,“闻和”,“官天地”,“府万物”,而人莫之测。非莫测也,天下测之于“大小长短修远”,于其无形之皆形、无状之皆状、如量而各正其性命者,莫之测也。 天道 虚则无不可实也,静则无不可动也。无不可实,无不可动,天人之合也。“运而无所积”,则谓之虚;古今逝矣,而不积其糟粕之谓也。“万物无足以铙心”,则谓之静;以形名从其喜怒之谓也。
Interpretation

The formless does not mean that something truly has no shape; it is simply invisible to people themselves. Once we understand that form exists within the formless and shape within the shapeless, measures such as “large and small, long and short, high and low, near and far” can no longer be used to limit it—much less can they encompass the myriad things beneath Heaven. Formless things can also reveal themselves as bodies, and shapeless things can also take on form. Within stillness there is movement; when movement comes to rest and gathers, the myriad things arise. They come into being in an exceedingly short time, yet each has its cause before it takes shape. Once a certain force gathers, form emerges. Understanding this, will we not cease clinging to stillness and instead follow movement? When the mind is still and free of fixation, movement will not run dry. Then movement will be upright, gathering will give rise to form, and generation will unfold naturally. The principle by which Heaven and Earth bring forth the myriad things is the same as that by which the sage establishes his work.

The mind may be emptied as though hollowed out, but what must be emptied is the mind that insists on seeking definitive answers; something must still remain within it. It can discern affairs clearly, hear in harmony, bring Heaven and Earth into order, and contain the myriad things, yet others find it difficult to fathom. This does not mean that no one can understand it at all. Rather, people are accustomed to measuring things by size, length, height, and distance. They therefore cannot fathom what is formless yet reveals form, shapeless yet takes on shape, or how such things each follow their own measure and rightly fulfill their nature and life.

The Way of Heaven

When the mind is empty, there is nothing it cannot contain; when it is still, there is nothing it cannot respond to. To contain the myriad things and respond to change is for the Way of Heaven and the human way to accord with each other. “It moves on without storing up” speaks of emptiness: let the ages flow by, past and present, without accumulating their remnants in the mind. “Nothing among the myriad things is enough to disturb the spirit” speaks of stillness: follow the forms and names of things, and respond to the changes in joy and anger they bring about. To contain all things and respond to all things is for the Way of Heaven and the human way to accord with each other. “It moves on without storing up” speaks of emptiness; that the ages flow by without leaving accumulated remnants conveys the same idea. “Nothing among the myriad things is enough to disturb the spirit” speaks of stillness; following the forms and names of things and responding to changes in joy and anger conveys the same idea.

不可实,无不可动,天人之合也。“运而无所积”,则谓之虚;古今逝矣,而不积其糟粕之谓也。“万物无足以铙心”,则谓之静;以形名从其喜怒之谓也。 虚静者,状其居德之名,非逃实以之虚,屏动以之静也、逃虚屏动,己愈逃,物愈积,“胶胶扰扰”,日铙其心,悱懑而欲逃之于死,死且为累,遗其虚静之糟粕以累后世。故黄老之下,流为刑名,以累无穷。况有生之日,屏营终口,与喧相竞,而菀积其悒怏乎? 虚静之中,天地推焉,万物通焉,乐莫大焉无穷。况有生之日,屏营终口,与喧相竞,而菀积其悒怏乎? 虚静之中,天地推焉,万物通焉,乐莫大焉。善体斯者,必不嚣嚣然建虚静为鹄而铙心以赴之,明矣。 天运 化之机微矣!化之神大矣!神人,故天地、日月、云雨、风雷动而愈出。机微,故求其所以然者,未有能测之者也。从其微而观之,则疑无化之者;无化之者,则“中无主”而奚止也。从其大而观之,则疑有操纵之者为其大司;有司操纵之权者,则“外无正”而不足以行。 天下之用心用物者,不出两端:或师其成心,或随物而移意,交堕于”大小长短修远”之中,而莫之能脱。夫两者不可据,而舍是以他求,则愈迷。 是以酌中外之安,以体微而用大者,以中裁外,外乃不淫;虚中受外,外乃不窒。治心治物者他求,则愈迷。
Interpretation

Emptiness and stillness describe the state in which Virtue (De) dwells in peace. They do not mean fleeing reality and seeking nothingness, nor suppressing activity and forcing oneself to be calm. The more one tries to escape into nothingness or stifle activity, the more distracting thoughts accumulate in the mind. One becomes troubled and restless all day, sunk in such gloom that one may even wish to escape through death. Yet death, too, can become a burden, leaving later generations only a damaged semblance of emptiness and stillness and continuing to trouble them. Thus the teachings of Huang-Lao—the line of thought associated with the Yellow Emperor and Laozi—later changed into the School of Names and Punishments, concerned with criminal law, status and governance, bringing endless entanglements. If, while alive, one must bustle about all day, contend amid the clamor, and fill one’s heart with pent-up frustration, why live this way?

In emptiness and stillness, Heaven and Earth move of themselves, and the myriad things communicate with one another; people thereby find boundless joy. Those who truly understand this do not loudly declare emptiness and stillness their goal, then exhaust themselves in pursuit of it. This is quite clear.

The Course of Heaven

The workings of change are exceedingly subtle, while its marvelous effects are vast. It is through these marvelous effects that Heaven and Earth, the sun and moon, clouds and rain, wind and thunder ceaselessly move and bring forth life. The workings of change are so subtle that no one has ever been able to discover completely why change takes place. Viewed in its minute details, change seems to have no directing power. But if there is no director, how can things move in an orderly way? Viewed on a vast scale, change seems to have a director who controls it. But if such a director exists, there is no external standard on which it can rely, and change would have no means of taking effect.

When people in the world apply their minds and deal with things, they generally do so in one of two ways: one clings to fixed preconceptions, while the other changes its mind in response to external things. Both are constrained by relative distinctions such as large and small, long and short, near and far, and cannot break free. Yet neither way offers a reliable basis. To abandon them and seek another method would only lead to greater confusion.

Therefore, one should consider what is at ease within and without, attend to what is subtle, and at the same time allow the vast to unfold. Use the inner to regulate the outer, and external things will not disturb the spirit excessively. Receive external things with an empty and still mind, and they will not obstruct the mind. In governing the mind or dealing with things, seeking a method elsewhere will only lead to greater confusion.

是以酌中外之安,以体微而用大者,以中裁外,外乃不淫;虚中受外,外乃不窒。治心治物者,虽欲不如是而奚可? 刻意 天下之术,皆生于好。好生恶、生悲、生乐、生喜、生怒。守其所好,则非所好者虽有道而不见虑。不得其好则忧,忧则变,变则迕,迕则必有所附而胶其交;交之胶者不终,则激而趋于非所好。如是者,初未尝不留好于道,而终捐道若忘;非但驰好于嗜欲者之捐天机也。 物虽可好,必知有道;道虽可好,必知有精。道以养精,非精以养道。天下莫不贵者,精而已矣留好于道,而终捐道若忘;非但驰好于嗜欲者之捐天机也。 物虽可好,必知有道;道虽可好,必知有精。道以养精,非精以养道。天下莫不贵者,精而已矣!精者,心之以为可,而非道之以为可。 缮性 守名义之已然,而不知其然;因时会之所尚,而己无尚;矫物情之所甚,而激为甚;夫是之谓俗夫。
Interpretation

Therefore, one must harmonize the inner and outer, quiet the mind, take what is subtle as the foundation, and use it to accomplish great things. Measure external things by an inner standard, and they will not exceed their proper bounds. Keep the mind empty and still, able to receive external things, and they will cause no obstruction. How could anyone who governs the mind and deals with external things fail to do this?

Deliberate Effort

All the ways of acting in the world arise from people’s likes and dislikes. Likes give rise to life, dislikes to death; sorrow, joy, delight, and anger arise from them as well. If you cling to what you like, then even when other things accord with the Dao, you will pay them no heed. When you cannot obtain what you like, you become distressed. Distress changes your mind, and a changed mind goes against the natural order. Once you have gone against it, you are bound to become attached to something and cling to it tightly. If you cannot sustain this entanglement for long, you will be provoked and turn to pursuing what you originally disliked. Such a person may not have failed to keep the Dao in mind at first, yet in the end abandons it, as though having forgotten it. This abandonment of the Dao is not confined to those who single-mindedly pursue their desires: they, too, lose the innate clarity of Heaven’s workings.

Even when external things are worthy of affection, one must understand that the Dao is present in them. Even when the Dao is worthy of affection, one must understand that it contains Jing (essence). The Dao nurtures Jing; Jing does not nurture the Dao. Everyone in the world values Jing. What is called Jing is what people consider precious; it is not necessarily what the Dao recognizes as precious.

Cultivating One’s Nature

Those who cling to established reputations and moral principles without understanding why they are as they are; who follow the fashions of the time without holding convictions of their own; and who try to correct excesses in external things and human affairs, only to push them further toward extremes—such people are called ordinary.

欲治俗,故礼乐兴焉。礼乐之始,先于羲、燧。羲、燧导礼乐之精,扬诩于万物。然则三王之精,精于黄、顼,明矣。天下之妙,莫妙于无。无之妙,莫妙于有有于无中,用无而妙其动。仁义,情而非法;礼乐,道而非功。礼动乐兴,肇无而有。无言无功,涤俗而游于真。不揭仁义之鼓以求亡无之妙,莫妙于有有于无中,用无而妙其动。仁义,情而非法;礼乐,道而非功。礼动乐兴,肇无而有。无言无功,涤俗而游于真。不揭仁义之鼓以求亡子,默动而已矣。 俗之所不至,初之所全,明之所毓,云将之游,鸿蒙之逝,御寇泠然之风,均之以天和,“知恬交相养”,而无以易其乐;又何轩冕之足云!是之谓“达礼乐之情”。 秋水 海若存乎量,河伯因乎势。以量观者,量之所及,函之而若忘之;量之所不及,映之固知有之。以势盈者,势之所至至之,势之所不至不能至也。 “秋水时至,百川灌河”,则河伯几狭海之所不及,映之固知有之。以势盈者,势之所至至之,势之所不至不能至也。 “秋水时至,百川灌河”,则河伯几狭海面自盈。寒潦降,汀沚出,则并丧其河,而奚况海哉?使河能不丧其量,则在河而河,在海而犹然河也,奚病乎?
Interpretation

In governing the secular world, rites and music came into being. Their origins lie far earlier than Fuxi and Suiren. Fuxi and Suiren guided their essence, bringing it to light and spreading it among the myriad things. Thus it is clear that the spiritual roots of the Three Kings—the rulers of the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties—lay with the Yellow Emperor and Zhuanxu.

Nothing under Heaven is more mysterious than “Nonbeing.” Its mystery lies in the way Being arises from Nonbeing; through the use of Nonbeing, the transformations of the myriad things reveal their subtle workings. Benevolence and righteousness arise from human feelings; they are not natural laws. Rites and music accord with the Dao; they are not pursued for the sake of results. When rites and music are set in motion and brought into being, they create Being from Nonbeing. Nonbeing does not speak or seek results. It cleanses the secular world and returns people to their true nature. Without beating the drums of benevolence and righteousness, it is difficult to explore the mystery contained in Nonbeing: Being arises from Nonbeing, and through the use of Nonbeing, transformations reveal their subtle workings. Benevolence and righteousness arise from human feelings; they are not natural laws. Rites and music accord with the Dao; they are not pursued for the sake of results. When rites and music are set in motion and brought into being, they create Being from Nonbeing. Nonbeing does not speak or seek results; it cleanses the secular world and returns people to their true nature. There is no need to raise the banners and drums of benevolence and righteousness in pursuit of the wondrous realm of Nonbeing. One need only let things transform in silence.

A realm beyond the reach of the secular world is the original state in which all things are whole and self-sufficient, the place where radiance is conceived and grows. Yunjiang set out on a journey, Hongmeng traveled afar, and Liezi rode the wind. All followed nature’s harmonious Qi, “quietly nourishing one another together with the myriad things”; nothing could alter their joy. What, then, is there to say about grand carriages and high rank? This is what it means to understand the true spirit of rites and music.

Autumn Floods

The Sea Spirit relies on a broad measure, while the River Earl is confined by the circumstances before him. When things are viewed by a measure, whatever the measure can reach is taken into account, as though nothing else need be noticed; what it cannot reach can still be reflected as something that truly exists. Those who take pride in their immediate circumstances can go only as far as those circumstances allow; they cannot reach what lies beyond them.

“When the autumn floods arrive on schedule, the many streams flow into the Yellow River,” and the River Earl almost came to think that the ocean, too, was no more than a small expanse. Yet he could still reflect that the ocean truly existed. Those who take pride in their immediate circumstances can go only as far as those circumstances allow; they cannot reach what lies beyond them.

When the autumn floods arrive on schedule and the many streams flow into the Yellow River, the River Earl thinks he has come into possession of an abundance of water. But when winter comes and the waters recede, sandbanks and islets emerge, and even the Yellow River’s volume is greatly reduced. How much more so the ocean! If the Yellow River could retain its own measure without losing it when its volume changes, then whether in its riverbed or out in the ocean, it would still be the Yellow River. What would there be to worry about?

尧、舜之让,汤、武之争,量也;“有天下而不与”,其何损焉!子哙之让,白公之争,势也;势不继而丧其固有矣。量与势者,“贵贱之门,小大之宗”也。 至乐 群趋之乐,趋于万物出入之机也;群争之名,争于人心出入之机也。 忧乐;势不继而丧其固有矣。量与势者,“贵贱之门,小大之宗”也。 至乐 群趋之乐,趋于万物出入之机也;群争之名,争于人心出入之机也。 忧乐定者,乐不以机;名实定者,争不以机。故或谓之得,或谓之失,或谓之生,或谓之死,而皆非也。众人出入乎机,内求之己而不得,则分得分失,分生分死,分乐分不乐,宜矣。 有常乐、有常名者,生死不可得而间,况荣辱乎? 行其所独知,而非气矜以取名,则子胥之死,犹久竹青宁之化也。志士且自以为死而乐,死以为名,何望于乘机之民! 达生
Interpretation

Yao and Shun ceded the realm; Tang of Shang and King Wu of Zhou seized it by force. All were acting by judging the times and weighing what was fitting. Even if one possesses the realm without taking part in it, what is there to lose? Zikui yielded his position to Zizhi, while Bai Gong Sheng launched a bid for power, each relying on the prevailing circumstances. Once those circumstances could no longer be sustained, they lost what they had originally possessed. Weighing what is fitting and relying on circumstances are the roots from which differences in status and scale arise.

“The Utmost Joy”

When people pursue joy, they pursue the turning point in the arising and passing away of the myriad things. When they contend for reputation, they contend over the turning point in people’s hearts.

Once sorrow and joy have settled, joy need not depend on anything external. Once reputation and substance have settled, contention need not depend on anything external. So people sometimes speak of gain and loss, sometimes of life and death, but none of these judgments is truly constant. People are always moving in and out of the turning points of change. If they search within themselves and still cannot understand, they will distinguish gain from loss, life from death, joy from its absence. This, too, is natural.

With constant joy and constant reputation, neither life nor death can intrude—how much less honor or disgrace?

Following the Way one alone understands, without relying on forceful bravado or self-display to win a name: the death of Wu Zixu, a minister of the state of Wu during the Spring and Autumn period, was no different from old bamboo transforming into qingning, the insect said in ancient times to emerge from bamboo. It was simply one of nature’s transformations. If even a man of noble purpose could believe that he died joyfully and make death a source of reputation, how could we expect those who turn with the changing circumstances to understand this?

“Understanding Life”

When it is said that “even wisdom is powerless,” this does not mean that things cannot be understood. It means that…

“知之所无奈何”,非不可知也,以取名,则子胥之死,犹久竹青宁之化也。志士且自以为死而乐,死以为名,何望于乘机之民! 达生 “知之所无奈何”,非不可知也,耳目心思之数量,止于此也。夫既止于此,犹且欲于弗止于此者而奈之何也,得乎?虽然,知亦无涯矣。守其所知,以量其量、数其数,止于此而可以穷年。此奈何者未易奈何也,而人且无奈之何,顾欲奈其所无如何,是离人而即谋于鬼。人鬼不相及,而离此以即彼,其于生与命,亦危矣哉! “纯气之守”,守其可奈何者也;“得全于天”,全其可奈何者也;“何,是离人而即谋于鬼。人鬼不相及,而离此以即彼,其于生与命,亦危矣哉! “纯气之守”,守其可奈何者也;“得全于天”,全其可奈何者也;“开生”者,开其可奈何者也;“用志不分”,志其可奈何者也;“内重外拙”,重其可奈何者也;“视羊之后者而鞭之”,鞭其可奈何者也;“长乎性,成乎命”,成其可奈何者也;“见鐻然后加手”,加其可奈何者也;“一而不桎”,一其可奈何者也;“为而不恃”,为其可奈何者也。穷年于知之所可奈何,则外荡之知,梦所不梦,“以鸟养鸟”,爰居可畜,而况吾之肝胆乎? 山木 命大性小。在人者性也,在天者皆命也。既已为人,则能性而不能命矣。在人者不梦,“以鸟养鸟”,爰居可畜,而况吾之肝胆乎? 山木
Interpretation

“To know where one’s knowledge cannot reach” does not mean that some things are wholly unknowable. It means that the range of what people can reach through their ears, eyes, and minds is limited. Since knowledge reaches only this far, can we push it beyond its limits? Even so, human knowledge has no end. Keep within the range you can know, judge by an appropriate measure, and count by an appropriate method. If you do this, you can pass through life in peace.

Things that are difficult to deal with are already hard to manage, and people are often powerless before them. Why, then, try to investigate matters that cannot be dealt with at all? It is like turning away from the realities of the human world and seeking counsel from ghosts and spirits. The realms of humans and spirits do not connect. To abandon what is near and pursue what is far puts both life and destiny in danger.

“Guarding pure Qi” means holding to what you can deal with. “Being made whole by Heaven” means preserving what you can deal with. “Opening life” means opening what you can deal with. “Applying one’s intention without distraction” means focusing on what you can deal with. “Valuing what is within and being awkward about what is outside” means valuing what you can deal with. “Seeing the one behind the sheep and then whipping it” means spurring yourself toward what you can deal with. “Maturing in one’s nature and fulfilling one’s destiny” means bringing to completion what you can deal with. “Seeing the bell stand before setting to work” means acting only when you are able to deal with the task. “Being unified without constraint” means being single-minded yet unbound. “Acting without relying on one’s achievements” means doing things without taking pride in oneself.

If you devote your whole life to what you can deal with, you will not be led astray by the world’s confused ideas; you may even surpass what you could imagine in a dream. Raise a bird in the way suited to raising a bird, and even Yuanju, the sea bird of ancient legend, can find its place. How much more so the human body and mind?

“Shanmu” (“Mountain Trees”)

Heaven’s Mandate is greater than a person’s inborn nature. A person’s nature belongs to the person; what belongs to Heaven falls under Heaven’s Mandate. Once you have been born as a human being, you can only do your best to follow your nature. You cannot control Heaven’s Mandate.

命大性小。在人者性也,在天者皆命也。既已为人,则能性而不能命矣。在人者皆天也,在己者则人也。既已为己,则能人而不能天矣。 物物者,知物之为物而非性也。不物于物者,知物之非己,而不受其命也。“饥渴、寒暑、穷桎”,至不可忍,而人能忍之,知其为天焉耳。物之所利,不可从而从之,不知其为命焉耳。 不知物之为天,天之为命,于是而希其不可得者以为得,是之谓幻心。人之不能有天,己之不能有物,虽欲为功于正,而固不能。不能而欲为功,是握空囊火之术也,世目之为幻人。 正而不待之,不谋贤,不欺不肖,不见其岸,约慎以循乎目前,正己之道有出于是者,是之谓“才不才之间”;非规避于一才一不才之间,以蕲不欺不肖,不见其岸,约慎以循乎目前,正己之道有出于是者,是之谓“才不才之间”;非规避于一才一不才之间,以蕲免于害之谓也。 田子方 “真”而弗“缘”,非“葆”也;“清”而绝“物”,非“清”也;“陋于知人心”,非“明乎礼义”也。自命为儒,而非儒者众,“步趋”而弗能“绝尘”也。待日月而用其“趾目”,无趾目者也。 趾有所以为趾,目有所以为目,有不亡者存。
Interpretation

Human nature is certainly important, but the scope of Heaven’s mandate is greater. Human nature belongs to the human side; everything that pertains to Heaven falls within Heaven’s mandate. Once we have become human, we can bring human nature into play, but we cannot govern Heaven’s mandate. Conversely, within the natural world, human beings are all expressions of Heaven. As for the part we can control ourselves, that belongs to the human realm. Since we must act on our own, we can only make the effort that is ours to make; we cannot govern Heaven.

Those who truly master external things know that external things are merely external things, not part of human nature. Those who are not ruled by external things know that these things are not the self, and so do not let them dictate their fate. When hunger and thirst, heat and cold, hardship and confinement become almost unbearable, people can still endure them because they know these are all part of Heaven’s mandate. When they pursue the benefits brought by external things relentlessly, even when they ought not to yield to them, it is because they do not know that these, too, are arranged by fate.

If people do not know that external things belong to Heaven, and that what Heaven bestows is fate, yet still crave what they cannot obtain and treat it as though they already possess it, this is called “illusory thought”—a deluded state of mind. People cannot control Heaven, nor can they command external things. Even if they hope to accomplish great deeds by following the upright way, in the end they cannot. To pursue great deeds while knowing they are beyond one’s reach is like playing with fire using an empty sack. The world calls such people “illusory people,” those lost in delusion.

To act uprightly without relying on external conditions; not to seek a reputation for worthiness, nor bully those who are unworthy; not to probe in advance the limits of a situation, but simply to keep oneself in check and act in accord with what is at hand—this is one way of rectifying oneself. It is called “between talent and lack of talent.” This does not mean deliberately avoiding both talent and its absence in order not to bully the unworthy or probe the limits of a situation, while carefully adapting to what is at hand. Rather, it means that the way of rectifying oneself can be expressed through this kind of conduct.

Tian Zifang

To pursue only “the true” without adapting to the changes of things is not truly to preserve one’s nature. To seek only “purity” by cutting oneself off from external things is not truly to be pure. To know nothing of the human heart yet imagine oneself to understand ritual and righteousness is not to understand ritual and righteousness. Many people call themselves Confucians without truly being Confucians: they can only follow in the footsteps of others and cannot truly surpass those who came before. Those who wait for the sun and moon to light the way before they know where to step or what to look at are like people without feet or eyes.

Feet have what makes them feet, and eyes have what makes them eyes. Even when the human body and its functions are lost, something remains that does not perish along with them.

夜其昼而昼其夜,全其神明于“解衣盘礴”之中,则天下亦不待目而见其明,不待趾而效其行,不待言而消其意。君子之道,言此亦数数矣衣盘礴”之中,则天下亦不待目而见其明,不待趾而效其行,不待言而消其意。君子之道,言此亦数数矣,非庄生之仅言也。 知北游 “参万岁而一成纯”,所为贵一也。众人知瞬,慧人知时,立志之人知日,自省之人知月,通人知岁,君子知终身,圣人知纯。其知愈永,其小愈忘。 哀哉!夜不及旦,晨不及晡,得当以效,而如鱼之间流淙而奋其鳞鬣也。言之唯恐不尽,行之唯恐不极,以是为勤,以是为敏,以是为几。“朝菌不知晦朔,蟪蛄不知春秋”,自小其年以趋于死,此之谓心死。 庚桑楚 持于“不可持”,以不持持之而无所持,则其“宇泰”。持之“灵台”,其泰乃定。唯其为“灵台”电,斯发乎“天光”矣。
Interpretation

Let the spirit of the mind no longer be constrained by day and night. In the freedom of “loosening one’s robes and stretching out” (taking off one’s outer garment and letting the body relax), preserve the clarity of the spirit. Then people throughout the world need not see him with their own eyes to understand his radiance; they need not watch him walk to follow his conduct; they need not hear him speak for the doubts in their hearts to disperse. This account of the Dao of the noble person has appeared time and again. Zhuangzi was not the only one to speak this way.

“Knowledge Wanders North”

“To survey ten thousand years and arrive at pure unity” means to look across ten thousand years of change and see that all ultimately returns to purity and unity. What is precious is holding fast to the One. Ordinary people see only an instant; the perceptive know how to seize the moment; people of resolve can see a whole day; those who examine themselves can see a month; the far-sighted can see a year; the noble person can see a lifetime; and the sage can apprehend the Dao of pure unity. The longer a person’s view extends, the more readily they forget the petty gains and losses of the present.

How lamentable! They cannot make it from night to dawn or wait from morning until evening. As soon as they have a chance to put their abilities to use, they thrash their fins like fish in a current. They speak for fear of leaving something unsaid and act for fear of not doing everything to the utmost, calling this diligence, speed, and cleverness. “The morning mushroom knows nothing of month’s end or beginning; the cicada knows nothing of spring or autumn.” The morning mushroom, which lives only from dawn to dusk, knows nothing of the monthly cycle; the short-lived cold-weather cicada knows nothing of the turning of the seasons. To regard one’s years as too few and rush toward death is called “the death of the mind.”

“Gengsang Chu”

Settle the mind in what “cannot be grasped”: do not try to hold on with a grasping mind, but let the mind cling to nothing. In this way, “the inner realm becomes spacious and tranquil.” Settle the mind in the “numinous terrace,” the place where the spirit resides, and inner peace can become steady. Only when the mind becomes a numinous terrace can it give forth “Heaven’s light,” the clarity of one’s innate spiritual nature.

“天光”者,天之耀吾“灵台”者也。众人之昧也,“实而无乎处”,强为之处;“长而无乎本剽”,强为之本剽;是冰与冻也。于是乎其宇不泰,而匿其乎处”,强为之处;“长而无乎本剽”,强为之本剽;是冰与冻也。于是乎其宇不泰,而匿其“天光”。能释冰与冻,无所匿而“天光”发,较之为贤矣,释氏之所谓“定生慧”也。虽然,其止此也矣。 “天光”耀乎“灵台”,则己之光匿,故“天光”者能耀人者也。有形者之齐于无形,“天光”烛之则冰释矣。无形者之有形,“天光”发而己之光匿,觌面而不相知,未有能知者也。持”不可持”,而自有持者存。“以有形象无形”,非以无形破有形也。 无形者,非无也。静而求之,旷眇而观之,宇宙之间,非有无形者。“天光”耀而夺吾光,于是乎。“以有形象无形”,非以无形破有形也。 无形者,非无也。静而求之,旷眇而观之,宇宙之间,非有无形者。“天光”耀而夺吾光,于是乎而见为形,见为无形,不可持也,非固有其无形可持也。形可持而无形“不可持”,无形“不可持”而非有无形者,则固可持矣。
Interpretation

“Heavenly light” is the radiance of the Dao illuminating the lingtai (the place where the mind and spirit reside). People’s minds and spirits grow dim and confused, forcing things that have no fixed position to be said to have one, and things with no fixed beginning or end to be said to have a beginning and an end. This is like ice and frost. As a result, the mind becomes constricted rather than open and at ease, and “heavenly light” is hidden away. To dissolve these icy attachments, leave the mind unobstructed, and let “heavenly light” appear is to surpass ordinary people. This is what Buddhists call “wisdom arising from concentration.” Yet even this is only a stopping point.

When “heavenly light” shines on the lingtai, one’s own radiance recedes. In this way, “heavenly light” can illuminate others. When what has form joins with the formless Dao and is seen by “heavenly light,” it is like ice and snow melting away. When the formless Dao appears in a visible form, “heavenly light” is revealed and one’s personal radiance recedes. Things may be right before us, yet remain unknowable to one another; no one can truly know them. Hold fast to what cannot be held fast, and within it there is a place that can be grasped. “Using form to image the formless” does not mean using the formless to destroy form.

The formless is not nothingness. Settle the mind and seek it; look broadly and deeply, and there are indeed formless things between Heaven and Earth. When “heavenly light” shines, it conceals one’s personal radiance, and formless things appear either in form or as formless. They cannot be grasped, but this is not because there is some fixed “formlessness” that could be grasped. Form can be grasped; the formless cannot. But the fact that the formless cannot be grasped does not mean it does not exist. In that sense, it can also be said to be graspable.

尧、舜之持,皆显无形之形者也。”春气发而百草生,正得秋而万宝成”,经营无形以显其有,无处、无本剽而实者实、长者长,莫之能御。斯岂“天光”之所能显乎?未可以“天光”之发为至极之观也,明矣。 徐无鬼阙 则阳 以人思虑之绝,而测之曰“莫为”;以人之必有思虑,而测之曰“或使”;天下之测道者,言尽矣。夫“莫之为”则不信,“或之使”则不通;然而物则可信而已通矣。知其信,不问其通;知其通,不恤其信;一曲之见,不可以行千里,而况其大者乎? 必不得已而欲知之,则于“圣,不问其通;知其通,不恤其信;一曲之见,不可以行千里,而况其大者乎? 必不得已而欲知之,则于“圣人之爱人”而知之。“其爱人也”,何以“终无已”,则疑乎“或之使”也;其“爱人也,人与之名,不告则不知”,则疑乎“莫之为”也。“莫之为”而为矣,“或之使”而未尝有使之者也。圣人之仁,天地之心,氤氲而不解,不尸功,不役名,不见德。此天之兆于圣人,圣人之合天者也。
Interpretation

The actions of Yao and Shun both revealed the form taken by the formless Dao. In spring, the vital energy stirs and the grasses sprout; by autumn, all things ripen. The formless Dao transforms and nurtures the myriad things, allowing each to grow and bear fruit. It has no fixed abode, and no original beginning can be found. Yet things naturally become full, and what grows naturally comes to maturity; nothing can stop this. Can this be explained solely by “Heaven’s radiance,” the light that manifests naturally? Clearly, the manifestation of “Heaven’s radiance” cannot be taken as the highest realization of the Dao.

Xu Wugui Que

Zeyang

If we entirely set aside human thought and then speculate about how the myriad things come into being, we might say “no agent acts” (mo wei). If we assume that some thought must lie behind the myriad things, we might infer that “something or someone makes them act” (huo shi). Those who speak of the Dao in the world generally carry their speculations no further than this. Yet to say that no agent acts is hard to believe, while to say that something or someone makes things act is difficult to explain. The existence of the myriad things is plain enough, and their movements do indeed proceed smoothly. Once we understand that they truly exist, there is no need to inquire into the principle behind their movement; once we understand that their movement proceeds smoothly, there is no need to insist on whether it comes from some ruler. A narrow view cannot even carry someone a thousand li; how much less can it be used to understand the greater Dao?

If we must know the reason, we can understand it by considering the saying that “the sage loves people.” Why does the sage’s love for people seem never to end? People might therefore suspect that something or someone is making the sage act. Yet “the sage loves people” is a praise bestowed by others. If no one told the sage, he might not know he was being praised in this way. People might then suspect that none of this has any ruler behind it. In truth, though no agent acts, things still happen naturally; though it may seem that something or someone makes them act, there is no particular agent doing so. The sage’s benevolence is the heart of Heaven and Earth. Like the Qi of Yin-Yang mingling and flowing, it continues without end, yet claims no credit, does not enlist fame in its service, and does not display its De. This is the manifestation of the Way of Heaven in the sage, and the expression of the sage’s unity with the Way of Heaven.

虽然,非“莫为”而无其迹,非“或使”而自贞其恒。“不知其然”者,人之谓圣人也。然圣人亦似然而实不然也。知其然,乃可驯至于“不知其然”。圣人之于天道,特不可以情测,而非不可测。未可以“莫为”、“或使”之两穷,而概之以“不知其然”也。天地之心,天地之仁;圣人之仁,圣人之心也。 外物 “外物不可必”,必之者成心之悬也。可流、可死,可忧、可悲,忠“不知其然”也。天地之心,天地之仁;圣人之仁,圣人之心也。 外物 “外物不可必”,必之者成心之悬也。可流、可死,可忧、可悲,忠孝无待于物,流死忧悲,而和未尝焚也。 苟尽于己而责于物,逢其“错行”则“大絯”。雷霆怒发而阴火狂兴,皆己与物“相摩”之必致者矣。忠孝而不焚其和,道恶乎有尽? 故方涸而请“西江之水”,侈于物之大者也;揭竿而“守鲵鲋”,拘于物之小者也;“载”而“矜”之,以物为非誉者也;“知困”“神不及”,移于物之梦者也。以忠孝与世“勃溪”,心有余而自“塞其窦”,名节之士所以怨尤而不安于道。知然,则道靖于己,而无待于物,刀锯水火,且得不游乎,名节之士所以怨尤而不安于道。知然,则道靖于己,而无待于物,刀锯水火,且得不游乎?而奚足以为忠孝病!
Interpretation

Even so, this does not mean that nothing rules over the myriad things, only that its traces cannot be seen. Nor does it mean that some force drives the myriad things and thereby enables them to maintain their natural order on their own. People call those who “do not know why things are as they are” sages. Sages may seem to be this way, but in truth they are not entirely without knowledge. Only by first understanding why things are as they are can one gradually reach the state of “no longer clinging to the question of why.”

When sages face the Way of Heaven, they cannot use personal feelings to speculate about it, but that does not mean the Way of Heaven is wholly beyond understanding. We cannot simply conclude that “we do not know why” before grasping the limits of the two claims that “the myriad things are naturally as they are” and “a force makes them so.” Heaven and Earth have an inner intention and benevolence; sages, too, have their own benevolence and original mind.

“External Things”

Things in the external world cannot be counted on to unfold as people wish. Insisting that they must do so means being held fast by rigid preconceptions. A person may be cast adrift or die, and may suffer anxiety or grief; yet loyalty and filial devotion are not determined by external things. Even when faced with exile, death, anxiety, or grief, inner peace is not burned away.

If you ask only that you yourself do your utmost while placing all responsibility on external things, then when adversity comes you will be thrown into alarm and confusion. Thunderous anger and gloomy frenzy are both the result of clashing with external things. If you can fulfill your loyalty and filial duty without harming your inner peace, how could the Dao ever be exhausted?

When a well is about to run dry, looking far away for water from the Western River is to place one’s hopes in external things on too grand a scale. Taking up a bamboo pole to guard a small fish is to be confined by things close at hand. “Carried along” and “priding oneself” mean taking external things as the measure of one’s right and wrong, honor and disgrace. “Knowing one’s limits” and “the spirit falling short” describe the mind and spirit being pulled along by external things and falling into dreamlike confusion.

If, in the name of loyalty and filial devotion, you contend with the world, your heart may have room to spare, yet you end up blocking your own path. Those who prize their reputation and integrity then grow resentful and unsettled, unable to rest in the Dao. Understand this, and the Dao can settle within you without relying on external things. Even when facing the punishments and dangers of knives, saws, water, and fire, you can remain composed. How could such things harm loyalty and filial devotion?

寓言阙 列御寇阙 让王四篇赝书也,鄙倍不可通 天下 患莫大于“治方术”,心莫迷于“闻风而说”,害莫烈于“天下之辨者相与乐之”。 夫圣人以为天之生己也,行乎其所行,习乎其所习,莫非命也,莫非性也,终身行而不逮,其言若怍,奚暇侈于闻、逐于乐、擅于方术以自旌? 道之在天下也,“无乎不在”,亦择之不给择,循之不给循,没世于斯而弗能尽,又奚暇以其“文之纶”鸣? “《诗》以道志,《书》以道事,《礼》以道行,《乐》以道和,《易》以道阴阳,《春秋》以道名分。”道也者,导也;导也者,传也。因《乐》以道和,《易》以道阴阳,《春秋》以道名分。”道也者,导也;导也者,传也。因已然而传之,“无传其溢辞”,以听人之自酌于大樽。大樽者,天下之共器也。我无好为人师之心,而代天之事已毕。故《春秋》者,刑赏之书也,“论而不议”,故“不赏而劝,不怒而威”。 墨翟、禽滑厘、宋钘、尹文、彭蒙、田骈、慎到、关尹、老聃、惠施者流,非刑非赏,而议之不已,为“山林之畏佳,大木百围之窍”而已矣,可以比竹之吹齐之矣,如《春秋》之不议,而又何齐邪? 故观于《春秋》,而庄生之不欲与天下耦也
Interpretation

The two chapters “Allegories” and “Lie Yukou” are missing.

The four chapters of “Letting the King Be” are forgeries. Their contents are shallow and absurd, and they are difficult to make sense of.

Among the calamities of the world, none is greater than the pursuit of techniques for governing the state. Among the workings of the mind, none is more easily thrown into confusion than believing rumors as soon as one hears them. And nothing is more deeply harmful than the world’s disputatious people taking pleasure in arguing with one another.

The sage believes that since Heaven has brought him into being, acting according to his circumstances and living in accordance with his natural disposition are both matters of fate and inborn nature. Even over a whole lifetime, one cannot fully live up to one’s proper part. To speak of such things is already enough to invite shame. What leisure, then, is there to show off one’s learning, chase after pleasures, or claim exclusive mastery of techniques in order to distinguish oneself?

The Dao is spread throughout the world; it is everywhere. Even if one sought it out, there would not be time to choose it all; even if one followed it, there would not be time to travel its full course. One may spend a whole lifetime immersed in it and still not exhaust it. What leisure, then, is there to flaunt the flourishes of literary language?

The Poetry expresses intentions; the Documents records affairs of government; the Rites regulates conduct; Music harmonizes people’s hearts; the Changes explains the transformations of Yin and Yang; and the Spring and Autumn Annals clarifies distinctions of rank and name. What is called “the Dao” is guidance; what is called “guidance” is instruction. One should teach by drawing on what is already understood, without adding excessive words, so that people may draw for themselves from the great goblet, a vessel for all to share. The great goblet is a vessel belonging to everyone under Heaven. I have no desire to set myself up as a teacher, and my duty to act on Heaven’s behalf is already complete.

Thus, the Spring and Autumn Annals is a record of punishments and rewards: it judges facts without indulging in unfounded commentary. It does not reward directly, yet it encourages people to do good; it does not express anger directly, yet it establishes authority.

People such as Mo Di, Qin Guli, Song Xing, Yin Wen, Peng Meng, Tian Pian, Shen Dao, Guan Yin, Lao Dan, and Hui Shi did not administer punishments or bestow rewards, yet they argued without end. Their words were no more than sounds from the mountains and forests, or echoes from the hollows of great trees—like different notes blown through bamboo pipes. Since the Spring and Autumn Annals avoids empty argument, why insist on tuning all these sounds to the same pitch?

After reading the Spring and Autumn Annals, then, one can see that Zhuangzi had good reason not to go along with the crowd under Heaven.

宜。

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback