《庄子集释》Vol. 8
About this page. The original text of 《庄子集释》 Vol. 8 (Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書, 28 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 5 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English
Reading modes explained
- Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
- Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
- Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
- Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.
Source textInterpretation
This passage explains the origin and appearance of the northern water god Yu Qiang (also called Yu Jing). He is said to have a human face and a bird’s body, and to travel mounted on a dragon. In lineage he belongs, like Zhuanxu, to the line descended from Xuanyuan the Yellow Emperor (Huangdi). Though he too attained the Dao, he did not become a human sovereign; instead he serves as the god who governs water. In the Five Phases (Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, Water), water corresponds to the north, so this deity is also described as occupying the “Northern Pole”—symbolizing northern water virtue and the god of the far north.
Accounts of the name “Yu Qiang” differ in ancient books. Works such as the Classic of Mountains and Seas record that on a islet in the northern sea there is a spirit with a human face and bird body, green snakes hanging from his ears and red snakes under his feet, named Yu Qiang. Cui’s commentary cites the Great Wilderness Classic: the god of the northern sea is named Yu Qiang, and the spirit turtle serves him. The Guicang also records that King Mu of Zhou once consulted Yu Qiang by divination. Another account, from the Overseas Classic: Yu Qiang of the north has a black body, human hands and feet, and rides two dragons. Guo Pu regarded him as a water god with human face and bird body; in brief texts he is the god of the northern sea, also called Yu Jing, grandson of the Yellow Emperor.
The text then mentions “Shaoguang” as the name of a mountain at the western extremity; “Wangmu” refers to the Queen Mother of the West (Xiwangmu), who belongs to the essence of Greater Yin (Taiyin). Legend says she has a leopard’s tail and tiger’s teeth and is often smiling: in the time of Shun, envoys were sent to present a jade ring; in the reign of Emperor Wu of Han she offered green peaches. She appears as a woman of about sixteen or seventeen, very dignified, and usually dwells on Mount Shaoguang in the west; having transcended life and death, no one knows her beginning or end. Guo Pu also treats her as a divine figure linked to yin and water; here her account is set beside that of the northern Yu Qiang, both as explanations of “gods of the extreme directions” in myth.
[Commentary 18·Shu]
Peng Zu was a great-grandson of Emperor Zhuanxu and was enfeoffed at Pengcheng; his Way could serve as a model for humanity, hence the name Peng Zu. He was skilled at nurturing life and had attained the Dao. The so-called “Five Lords” (wubo): in the Xia there was Kunwu; in the Shang, Da Peng and Shiwei; in the Zhou, Duke Huan of Qi and Duke Wen of Jin—together called the Five Hegemons. Since Peng Zu had attained the Dao, he could live long, reaching from the time of Youyu down through the Yin and Zhou, about eight hundred years in all.
[Exegesis]
The explanation of “Peng Zu” is found in the Xiaoyao (Free and Easy Wandering) chapter. Cui’s commentary says he lived seven hundred years; some take him as an immortal who did not die, spanning from Youyu through the Yin and Zhou—eight hundred years in all.
[Exegesis · Five Lords (wubo)]
Wubo is read as the character for “lord” (bo), or with the pronunciation ba (hegemon). Cui and Li say: Xia lord Kunwu; Yin—Da Peng and Shiwei; Zhou—Duke Huan of Qi and Duke Wen of Jin.
[Note 19]
The Dao itself has no capacity to act as an agent. When the text says “obtaining it from the Dao,” that only marks something uniquely attained on one’s own. Since it is one’s own unique attainment, it is not that the Dao can obtain it for a person; if one has not yet attained it, the Dao cannot “obtain” it for one either. Thus whoever truly has attainment does not rely outward on the Dao as a resource, nor inward on forced effort of the self—they open out and transform of themselves, transforming alone. The difficulty of life lies precisely in this self-transforming attainment; once life is attained, why fear not attaining life and act deliberately for that? Therefore, seeking life for its own sake is not enough to preserve authentic life—because if life is not from oneself and one forces it, one injures the genuine life that is one’s own.
No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【一】【疏】葵当为綦字之误,犹人间世篇中南南伯子葵问乎女偊曰:“子之年长矣,而色若()〔孺〕子,何也【一】?” 【一】【疏】葵当为綦字之误,犹人间世篇中南郭子綦也。女偊,古之怀道人也。孺子,犹稚子也。女偊久闻至道,故能摄卫养生,年虽老,犹有童颜之色,驻彩之状。既异凡人,是故子葵问其何以致此也。 【释文】《南伯子葵》李云:葵当为綦,声之误也。《女偊》徐音禹,李音矩。一云,是妇人也。《年长》张丈反。◎卢文弨曰:今本作丁丈反,与前后同。《子》本亦作孺,如喻反。李云:弱子也。◎卢文弨曰:今本作孺,是正体。 曰:“吾闻道矣【一】。” 【一】【注】闻道则任其自生,故气色全也。 【疏】答云:闻道故得全生,是以反少还童,色如稚子。 南伯子葵曰:“道(一)可得学邪【一】?” 【一】【疏】睹其容色,既异常人,心怀景慕,故询其方术。 南伯子葵曰:“道(一)可得学邪【一】?” 【一】【疏】睹其容色,既异常人,心怀景慕,故询其方术也。 【校】(一)赵谏议本无道字。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
曰:“恶!恶可!子非其人也【一】。夫卜梁倚有圣人之才而无圣人之道,我有圣人之道而无圣人之才【二】,吾欲以教之,庶几其果为圣人乎!不然,以圣人之道告圣人之才,亦易矣。吾犹守而告之【三】,参日而后能外天下【四】;已外天下矣,吾又守之,七日而后能外物【五】;已外物矣,吾又守之,九日而后能外生【六】;已外生矣,而后能朝彻【七】;朝彻,而后能见独【八】;见独,而后能无古今【九】;无古今,而后能入于不死不生【一0】。杀(一)生者不死,生能朝彻【七】;朝彻,而后能见独【八】;见独,而后能无古今【九】;无古今,而后能入于不死不生【一0】。杀(一)生者不死,生生者不生【二】。其为物,无不将也【一二】,无不迎也【一三】;无不毁也【一四】,无不成也【一五】。其名为撄宁。【一六】撄宁也者,撄而后成者也【一七】。” 【一】【疏】恶恶可,言不可也。女偊心神内静,形色外彰。子葵见(有)〔其〕容貌,欣然请学。嫌其所问,故抑之谓非其人也。 【释文】《恶恶可》并音乌。下恶乎同。Nüyu said: “No! That will not do! You are not someone capable of learning this teaching.”
Buliangyi had natural endowment—he seemed to possess a sage’s talent, yet lacked a sage’s Dao; I possessed a sage’s Dao, yet lacked a sage’s talent. I wished to transmit the Dao to him, in the hope that he might truly become a sage through learning. Otherwise, to instruct someone who already had a sage’s natural gift with a sage’s Dao ought not to be overly difficult in itself. I still guarded the Dao and taught him gradually—after three days he could finally release “all under heaven” from his mind; once he had released all under heaven, I had him continue guarding, and after seven days he could release external things from his mind; once he had released external things, he guarded again, and after nine days he could lightly release even “his own life” from his mind. Only after one has transcended attachment to one’s own life can one attain zhaoche (morning clarity—the mind clear and bright as at dawn); only after zhaoche can one attain jiandu (seeing the One—beholding the unique Dao beyond all duality); only after jiandu can one cease distinguishing past from present; only after ceasing to distinguish past from present can one enter the realm of “neither death nor birth.” What is said to slay life does not die; what is said to nourish life is not born. As the source of the myriad things, there is nothing it does not send off, nothing it does not welcome, nothing it does not destroy, nothing it does not complete—this state is called yingning. Yingning means that after disturbance and contact, one can still settle and remain steadfast in one’s true self.
[2]
Bu is the surname and Liang the given name; Yi is the personal name. To treat inner emptiness, stillness, and concentrated detachment as “Dao,” and cleverness and quick wit as “talent,” means this: Liang Yi had skill for outward use but lacked the inner work of concentration and settling; Nü Ou (a personal name—the seeker who appears often below) had the ground of emptiness and detachment but was not clever or quick enough. Each leaned to one side and had not yet reached fullness and thoroughness. Still, when “talent” and “Dao” are weighed against each other, talent in the end cannot match Dao for being fundamental and for prevailing.
[3]
Shu means to admire and to hope; ji means to draw near; guo means to decide and to carry through. When people of the highest caliber hear the Great Dao, they still depend on earnest practice and real training; without that practice, the Dao cannot be grasped. So even after receiving teaching, one must still study and cultivate—admire and approach the subtle Dao—before one can decide and become a sage. When that fails, a spoken announcement is easy, but truly holding to it and putting it into practice is hard. Nü Ou had long heard the utmost Dao and her heart was already still and empty; now that she was to transmit and tell others, she still kept it to herself and would not let it go. All the more for those just beginning—they must not slacken. Even speaking with the mouth and listening with the ears—what good does that do? Thus it is not “knowing” that is difficult, but “doing” that is difficult.
[4]
Wai here carries the sense of forgetting and setting aside. Being a master is not easy; transmitting the Way is especially hard. Precisely because she was about to teach, she concentrated her spirit and stilled her thoughts, cultivated and guarded it—for three full days. Once the heart was empty and still, every kind of realm became empty; then heaven above and earth below seemed as if they no longer existed at all.
[5]
Wu refers to what one needs morning and evening—things closely tied to oneself and hard to relinquish.
The various realms of experience in the world lie far from people, so they are easy to forget; what one needs to nurture the body is right at hand, so it is hard to let go. Only after holding to practice through the seventh day can one release such attachments altogether. Guo Xiang notes that “things” (wu) here means what one cannot do without morning and night—what is bound up with the person and hard to abandon.
【Six】【Commentary】 Let everything go.
【Commentary】 Cast off clinging to the body and the wish to leave the physical form; enter the states of “sitting and forgetting” (zuowang) and “losing the self” (sang wo). As the mind keeps at it over time, shedding fixations goes deeper step by step.
【Seven】【Commentary】 Let go even of clinging to “life,” and one no longer loathes death. Without loathing death, one can be at ease in whatever comes; the heart opens without obstruction and moves with each turning—this is called “morning clarity” (zhao che).
【Commentary】 “Zhao” is early dawn; “che” is penetrating brightness. When life and death are seen on a level, self and things forgotten, wisdom shines clear like the sun at daybreak—hence “morning clarity.”
【Eight】【Commentary】 Whatever one meets, rest in it; no longer tally what comes before or after in sequence—this is “seeing the One” (jian du).
【Commentary】 The utmost Dao is still and unmoving; its subtlety lies beyond words and images—neither being nor non-being, neither ancient nor modern, coming and going alone, relying on no counterpart. To see this singular realm is “seeing the One.” The Laozi’s “Silent, empty; standing alone, unchanging” points the same way.
【Nine】【Commentary】 Go forward together with the “One.”
【Commentary】 Let the maker renew things day by day; turn with change as it flows; do not be pulled about by outer things—then there is no split between ancient and modern.
No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【一五】【注】任其自成,故无不成。 【疏】不送而送,无不毁灭;不迎而迎,无不生成也。 【一六】【注】夫与物冥者,物萦亦萦,而未始不宁也。 【疏】撄,扰动也。宁,寂静也。夫圣人慈惠,道济苍生,妙本无名,随物立称,动而常寂,虽撄而宁者也。 【释文】《撄》郭音萦,徐于营反,李于盈反。崔云:有所系着也。◎家世父曰:赵岐孟子注:撄,迫也。物我生死之见迫于中,将迎成毁之机迫于外,而一无所动其心,乃谓之撄宁。置身纷纭蕃变交争互触之地,而心固宁焉,则几于成矣,我生死之见迫于中,将迎成毁之机迫于外,而一无所动其心,乃谓之撄宁。置身纷纭蕃变交争互触之地,而心固宁焉,则几于成矣,故曰撄而后成。 【一七】【注】物萦而独不萦,则败矣。故萦而任之,则莫不曲成也(二)。 【疏】既能和光同尘,动而常寂,然后随物撄扰,善贷生成也。 【校】(一)阙误引江南古藏本杀上有故字。(二)世德堂本也作矣。 南伯子葵曰:“子独恶乎闻之【一】?” 【一】【疏】子葵怪女偊之谈,其道高妙,故问“子于何处独得闻之”?自斯已下,凡有九重,前六约教,后三据理,并是女偊告示子葵之辞也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
曰:“闻诸副墨之子【一】,副墨之子闻诸洛诵之孙【二】,洛诵之孙闻之瞻明【三】,瞻明闻之聂许【四】,聂许闻之需役【五】,需役闻之于讴【六】,于讴闻之诵之孙【二】,洛诵之孙闻之瞻明【三】,瞻明闻之聂许【四】,聂许闻之需役【五】,需役闻之于讴【六】,于讴闻之玄冥【七】,玄冥闻之参寥【八】,参寥闻之疑始【九】。” 【一】【疏】诸,之也。副,副贰也。墨,翰墨也;翰墨,文字也。理能生教,故谓文字为副贰也。夫鱼必因筌而得,理亦因教而明,故闻之翰墨,以明先因文字得解故也。 【释文】《副墨》李云:可以副贰玄墨也。崔云:此已下皆古人姓名,或寓之耳,无其人。 【二】【疏】临本谓之副墨,背文谓之洛诵。初既依文生解,所以执持披读;次则渐悟其理,是故罗洛诵之。且教从理生,故称为子;而诵因教起,名之曰孙也。 【释文】《洛诵》李云:诵,通也。苞洛无所不通也。 【三】【疏】瞻,视也,亦至也。读诵精熟,功劳积久,渐见至理,灵府分明。 【释文】苞洛无所不通也。 【三】【疏】瞻,视也,亦至也。读诵精熟,功劳积久,渐见至理,灵府分明。 【释文】《瞻明》音占。李云:神明洞彻也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【四】【疏】聂,登也,亦是附耳私语也。既诵之稍深,因教悟理,心生欢悦,私自许当,附耳窃私语也。既闻于道,未敢公行,亦是渐登胜妙玄情者也。 【释文】《聂许》徐乃摄反。李云:许,与也。摄而保之,无所施与也。 【五】【疏】需,须也。役,用也,行也。虽复私心自许,智照渐明,必须依教遵循,勤行勿怠。懈而不行,道无由致。 【释文】《需役》徐音须,李音儒,云:儒弱为役也。王云:需,待也。役,亭毒也。 【六】【疏】讴,歌谣也。既因教悟理,依解而行,遂使盛惠显致。 【释文】《需役》徐音须,李音儒,云:儒弱为役也。王云:需,待也。役,亭毒也。 【六】【疏】讴,歌谣也。既因教悟理,依解而行,遂使盛惠显彰,讴歌满路也。 【释文】《于》音乌,又如字。《讴》徐乌侯反。李香于反,云:讴,煦也,欲化之貌。王云:讴,歌谣也。 【七】【注】玄冥者,所以名无而非无也。 【疏】玄者,深远之名也。冥者,幽寂之称。既德行内融,芳声外显,故渐阶虚极,以至于玄冥故也。 【释文】《玄冥》李云:强名曰玄,视之冥然。向郭云:所以名无而非无也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【八】【注】夫阶名以至无者,必得无于名表。故虽玄冥犹未极,而又推寄于参寥,亦是玄之又玄也。 【疏】参,三也。寥,绝也。一者绝有,二者绝无,三者非有非无,故谓之三绝也。夫玄冥之境,虽妙未极,故至乎三绝,方造重玄也。 【释文】。寥,绝也。一者绝有,二者绝无,三者非有非无,故谓之三绝也。夫玄冥之境,虽妙未极,故至乎三绝,方造重玄也。 【释文】《参》七南反。《寥》徐力雕反。李云:参,高也。高邈寥旷,不可名也。 【九】【注】夫自然之理,有积习而成者。盖阶近以至远,研粗以至精,故乃七重而后及无之名,九重而后疑无是始也。 【疏】始,本也。夫道,超此四句,离彼百非,名言道断,心知处灭,虽复三绝,未穷其妙。而三绝之外。道之根本,(而)〔所〕谓重玄之域,众妙之门,意亦难得而差言之矣。是以不本而本,本无所本,疑名为本,亦无的可本,故谓之疑始也。 【释文】《疑始》李云:又疑无是始,则始非无名也。《研粗》七胡反。《七重》直龙反。下同。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
子祀子可本,故谓之疑始也。 【释文】《疑始》李云:又疑无是始,则始非无名也。《研粗》七胡反。《七重》直龙反。下同。 子祀子舆子犁子来四人相与语曰:“孰能以无为首,以生为脊,以死为尻,孰知死生存亡之一体者,吾与之友矣。”【一】四人相视而笑,莫逆于心,遂相与为友【二】。 【一】【疏】子祀四人,未详所据。观其心迹,并方外之士,情同淡水,共结素交,叙莫逆于虚玄,述忘言于至道。夫人起自虚无,无则在先,故以无为首;从无生有,生士,情同淡水,共结素交,叙莫逆于虚玄,述忘言于至道。夫人起自虚无,无则在先,故以无为首;从无生有,生则居次,故以生为脊;既生而死,死最居后,故以死为尻;亦故然也。尻首虽别,本是一身;而死生乃异,源乎一体。能达斯趣,所遇皆适,岂有存亡欣恶于其间哉!谁能知是,我与为友也。 【释文】《子祀》崔云:淮南作子永,行年五十四而病伛偻。◎庆藩案崔本作子永,是也。今本淮南精神篇作子求,与崔所见本异。顾千里曰:求当作永。抱朴子博喻篇曰子永叹天伦之伟,字正作永。永求形近,经传中互误者,不可枚举。《子舆》本又作与,音博喻篇曰子永叹天伦之伟,字正作永。永求形近,经传中互误者,不可枚举。《子舆》本又作与,音余。《子犁》礼兮反。《为尻》苦羔反。 【二】【疏】目击道存,故相见而笑;同顺玄理,故莫逆于心也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
俄而子舆有病,子祀往问之【一】。曰:“伟哉夫造物者,将以予为此拘拘也【二】!曲偻发背,上有五管,颐隐于齐,肩高于顶,句赘指天。”阴阳之气有沴【三】,其心闲而无事【四】,跰(足鲜)而鉴于井,曰:“嗟乎!夫造物者又将以予为此拘拘也【五】!” 【一】【疏】友人既病,须往问之,任理而行,不乖于方外也。 【二】【疏】伟,大也。造物,犹造化也。拘拘,挛缩不申之貌也。夫洪炉大冶,造物无偏,岂独将我一身故为拘挛之疾!以此而言,无非命也。子舆达理,自叹此辞也。 【释文】《伟,挛缩不申之貌也。夫洪炉大冶,造物无偏,岂独将我一身故为拘挛之疾!以此而言,无非命也。子舆达理,自叹此辞也。 【释文】《伟哉》韦鬼反。向云:美也。崔云:自此至鉴于井,皆子祀自说病状也。《拘拘》郭音驹。司马云:体拘挛也。王云:不申也。 【三】【注】沴,陵乱也。 【疏】伛偻曲腰,背骨发露。既其俯而不仰,故藏腑并在上,头低则颐隐于脐,(膞)〔膊〕耸则肩高于顶,而咽项句曲,大挺如赘。阴阳二气,陵乱不调,遂使一身,遭斯疾笃。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【释文】《曲偻》徐力主反。《于顶》本亦作项。崔本作釭,音项。◎卢文弨曰:旧作钉,音顶。今本作缸,音项。据宋本钉音项,疑钉为釭之讹,参酌改正。《句》俱树反,徐古侯反。《赘》徐之税反。《指天》李云:句赘,项椎也。其形似酌改正。《句》俱树反,徐古侯反。《赘》徐之税反。《指天》李云:句赘,项椎也。其形似赘,言其上向也。《有沴》音丽,徐又徒显反。郭奴结反,云:陵乱也。李同。崔本作□,云:满也。 【四】【注】不以为患。 【疏】死生犹为一体,疾患岂复概怀!故虽曲偻拘拘,而心神闲逸,都不以为事。 【释文】《其心闲》音闲。崔以其心属上句。 【五】【注】夫任自然之变者,无嗟也,与物嗟耳。 【疏】跰(足鲜),曳疾貌。言曳疾力行,照临于井,既见己貌,遂使发伤嗟。寻夫大道自然,造物均等,岂偏于我,独此拘挛?欲显明物理,故寄兹嗟照临于井,既见己貌,遂使发伤嗟。寻夫大道自然,造物均等,岂偏于我,独此拘挛?欲显明物理,故寄兹嗟叹也。 【释文】《跰(足鲜)》步田反,下悉田反。崔本作边鲜。司马云:病不能行,故跰(足鲜)也。《而鉴》古暂反。《曰嗟乎》崔云:此子舆辞。 子祀曰:“女恶之乎【一】?”No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【一】【疏】淡水素交,契心方外,见其嗟叹,故有惊疑。 【释文】《女恶》音汝。下同。下乌路反。 曰:“亡,予何恶【一】!浸假而化予之左臂以为鸡,予因以求时夜;浸假而化予之右臂以为弹,予:“亡,予何恶【一】!浸假而化予之左臂以为鸡,予因以求时夜;浸假而化予之右臂以为弹,予因以求鸮炙;浸假而化予之尻以为轮,以神为马,予因以乘之,岂更驾哉!【二】且夫得者,时也,【三】失者,顺也【四】;安时而处顺,哀乐不能入也【五】。此古之所谓县解也,而不能自解者,物有结之【六】。且夫物不胜天久矣,吾又何恶焉【七】!” 【一】【疏】亡,无也。存亡死生,本自无心。不嗟之嗟,何嫌恶之也! 【释文】《曰亡》如字。绝句,《予何恶》乌路反。下及注同。一音如字读,则连亡字为句。 【二】【注】浸,渐也。夫体化合变,则无往而不因,无因而不可也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【疏】假令阴阳二气,渐而化我左右两臂为鸡为弹,弹则求于鸮鸟,鸡则夜候天时。尻无识而为轮,神有知而作马,因渐渍而变化,乘轮马以遨游阴阳二气,渐而化我左右两臂为鸡为弹,弹则求于鸮鸟,鸡则夜候天时。尻无识而为轮,神有知而作马,因渐渍而变化,乘轮马以遨游,苟随任以安排,亦于何而不适者也。 【释文】《浸》子鸩反。向云:渐也。《予因以求时夜》一本无求。《为弹》徒旦反。《鸮》户骄反。《炙》章夜反。 【三】【注】当所遇之时,世谓之得。 【四】【注】时不暂停,顺往而去,世谓之失。 【五】【疏】得者,生也,失者,死也。夫忽然而得,时应生也;倏然而失,顺理死也。是以安于时则不欣于生,处于顺则不恶于死。既其无欣无恶,何忧乐之入乎! 【释文】《哀乐》音洛。 【六】【注】一不能自解,则众物共结之矣。故能解则无所不解,不于生,处于顺则不恶于死。既其无欣无恶,何忧乐之入乎! 【释文】《哀乐》音洛。 【六】【注】一不能自解,则众物共结之矣。故能解则无所不解,不解则无所而解也。 【疏】处顺忘时,萧然无系,古昔至人,谓为县解。若夫当生虑死,而以憎恶存怀者,既内心不能自解,故为外物结缚之也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【释文】《县》音玄。《解》音蟹,下及注同。(同)〔向〕(一)云:县解,无所系也。 【七】【注】天不能无昼夜,我安能无死生而恶之哉! 【疏】玄天在上,犹有昼夜之殊,况人居世间,焉能无死生之变!且物不胜天,非唯今日,我复何人,独生憎恶! 【校】(一)向字依世德堂本及释文原本改。 俄而子来有病,喘喘然将死,其妻子环而泣之【一】。子犁往问之,曰:“叱!避!无怛化【二】!”倚其户与之语曰:“来有病,喘喘然将死,其妻子环而泣之【一】。子犁往问之,曰:“叱!避!无怛化【二】!”倚其户与之语曰:“伟哉造化!又将奚以汝为,将奚以汝适?以汝为鼠肝乎?以汝为虫臂乎?”【三】 【一】【疏】环,绕也。喘喘,气息急也。子舆语讫,俄顷之间,子来又病,气奔欲死。既将属纩,故妻子绕而哭之也。 【释文】《喘喘》川转反,又尺软反。崔本作惴惴。《环而》如字。徐音患。李云:绕也。 【二】【注】夫死生犹寤寐耳,于理当寐,不愿人惊之,将化而死亦宜,无为怛之也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【疏】叱,诃声也。夫方外之士,冥一死生,而朋友临终,和光往【注】夫死生犹寤寐耳,于理当寐,不愿人惊之,将化而死亦宜,无为怛之也。 【疏】叱,诃声也。夫方外之士,冥一死生,而朋友临终,和光往问。故叱彼亲族,令避傍近,正欲变化,不欲惊怛也。 【释文】《叱避》昌失反。《无怛》丁达反。崔本作靼,音怛。案怛,惊也。郑众注周礼考工记不能惊怛,是也。 【三】【疏】又,复也。奚,何也。适,往也。倚户观化,与之而语。叹彼大造,弘普无私,偶尔为人,忽然返化。不知方外适往何道,变作何物。将汝五复也。奚,何也。适,往也。倚户观化,与之而语。叹彼大造,弘普无私,偶尔为人,忽然返化。不知方外适往何道,变作何物。将汝五藏为鼠之肝,或化四支为虫之臂。任化而往,所遇皆适也。 【释文】《倚其》于绮反。《鼠肝》向云:委弃土壤而已。王云:取微蔑至贱。《虫臂》臂,亦作肠。崔本同。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
子来曰:“父母于子,东西南北,唯命之从。阴阳于人,不翅于父母【一】;彼近吾死而我不听,我则悍(一)矣,彼何罪焉【二】!夫大块载我以形,劳我以生,佚我以老,息我以死。故善吾生者,悍(一)矣,彼何罪焉【二】!夫大块载我以形,劳我以生,佚我以老,息我以死。故善吾生者,乃所以善吾死也【三】。今(之)(二)大冶铸金,金踊跃曰‘我且必为镆',大冶必以为不祥之金。今一犯人之形,而曰‘人耳人耳',夫造化者必以为不祥之人【四】。今一以天地为大炉,以造化为大冶,恶乎往而不可哉【五】!”成(三)然寐,蘧然觉【六】。 【一】【注】自古或有能违父母之命者矣,未有能违阴阳之变而距昼夜之节者也。 【疏】自此已下,是子来临终答子犁之词也。夫孝子侍亲,尚驱驰唯命。况阴阳造化,何啻二亲乎!故知违亲之教,世或有焉;拒于阴阳,未之有也。 【释文】《不翅》徐诗知反。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【二】【注】况阴阳造化,何啻二亲乎!故知违亲之教,世或有焉;拒于阴阳,未之有也。 【释文】《不翅》徐诗知反。 【二】【注】死生犹昼夜耳,未足为远也。时当死,亦非所禁,而横有不听之心,适足悍逆于理以速其死。其死之速,由于我悍,非死之罪也。彼,谓死耳;在生,故以死为彼。 【疏】彼,造化也。而造化之中,令我近死。我恶其死而不听从,则是我拒阴阳,逆于变化。斯乃咎在于我,彼何罪焉!郭注以死为彼也。 【释文】《彼近》。如字。《则悍》本亦作捍,胡旦反。又音旱。说文云:捍,抵也。 【三】【注】理常俱也。 【疏】此重引前文,证成彼义。斯言切当,所以再出。其解释文意,不异前旨。 【四】【注】人耳人耳,唯愿为人也。亦犹金之踊跃,世疏】此重引前文,证成彼义。斯言切当,所以再出。其解释文意,不异前旨。 【四】【注】人耳人耳,唯愿为人也。亦犹金之踊跃,世皆知金之不祥,而不能任其自化。夫变化之道,靡所不遇,今一遇人形,岂故为哉?生非故为,时自生耳。务而有之,不亦妄乎!No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【疏】祥,善也。犯,遇也。镆,古之良剑名也。昔吴人干将为吴王造剑,妻名镆,因名雄剑曰干将,雌剑曰镆。夫洪炉大冶,镕铸金铁,随器大小,悉皆为之。而炉中之金,忽然跳踯,殷勤致请,愿为良剑名镆,因名雄剑曰干将,雌剑曰镆。夫洪炉大冶,镕铸金铁,随器大小,悉皆为之。而炉中之金,忽然跳踯,殷勤致请,愿为良剑。匠者惊嗟,用为不善。亦犹自然大冶,雕刻众形,鸟兽鱼虫,种种皆作。偶尔为人,遂即欣爱,郑重启请,愿更为人,而造化之中,用为妖孽也。 【释文】《我且》如字。徐子余反。《镆》音莫。《》似嗟反。镆,剑名。 【五】【注】人皆知金之有系为不祥,故明己之无异于金,则所系之情可解,可解则无不可也。 【疏】夫用二仪造化,一为炉冶,陶铸群物,锤锻苍生,磅礡无心,亭毒均等,所遇斯适,何恶何欣!安排变化,无往不可也。 【释文】《大炉》劣奴反。《恶乎》音乌。《可解》如字,下同。 【遇斯适,何恶何欣!安排变化,无往不可也。 【释文】《大炉》劣奴反。《恶乎》音乌。《可解》如字,下同。 【六】【注】寤寐自若,不以死生累心。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【疏】成然是闲放之貌,蘧然是惊喜之貌。寐,寝也,以譬于死也。觉是寤也,以况于生。然寤寐虽殊,何尝不从容逸乐;死生乃异,亦未始不任命逍遥。此总结子来以死生为寤寐者也。 【释文】《成然》如字,崔同。李云:成然,县解之貌。本或作戌,音恤。简文云:当作灭。本又作□,呼括反,视高貌。本亦作俄然。《蘧然》李音渠。崔本作据,又其据反。蘧然,有形之貌。《觉》古貌。本或作戌,音恤。简文云:当作灭。本又作□,呼括反,视高貌。本亦作俄然。《蘧然》李音渠。崔本作据,又其据反。蘧然,有形之貌。《觉》古孝反。向崔本此下更有发然汗出一句,云:无系则津液通也。崔云:荣卫和通,不以化为惧也。 【校】(一)赵谏议本悍作捍。(二)之字依世德堂本删。(三)阙误引古本成作□,云:□音呼聒切,高视貌。又音烘,蒙□,不明。 子桑户孟子反子琴张三人相与友,曰:“孰能相与于无相与,相为于无相为【一】?孰能登天游雾,挠挑无极【二】;相忘以生,无所终穷【三】?”三人相视而笑,莫逆于心,遂相与为友【四】。 【一】【注】夫体天地,冥变化者(一),虽手足异任,五藏殊官(二),未尝相与而百节同而笑,莫逆于心,遂相与为友【四】。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【一】【注】夫体天地,冥变化者(一),虽手足异任,五藏殊官(二),未尝相与而百节同和,斯相与于无相与也;未尝相为而表里俱济,斯相为于无相为也。若乃役其心志以恤手足,运其股肱以营五藏,则相营愈笃而外内愈困矣。故以天下为一体者,无爱为于其间也。 【疏】此之三人,并方外之士,冥于变化,一于死生,志行既同,故相与交友。仍各率乃诚,述其情致云:谁能于虚无自然而相与为朋友乎?斯乃无与而与,无为而为,非为之而为,与之而与者也。犹如五藏六根,四肢百体,各有司存,更相御用,岂有心于相与,情系于亲疏哉!虽无意于相为,而相济之功成矣。故于无与而相与周旋,于无为而为交友者,其义亦然乎耳。 【释文】《相与》如字。崔云:犹亲也。或亲疏哉!虽无意于相为,而相济之功成矣。故于无与而相与周旋,于无为而为交友者,其义亦然乎耳。 【释文】《相与》如字。崔云:犹亲也。或一音豫。《相为》如字,或一音于伪反。《爱为》于伪反。 【二】【注】无所不任。 【疏】挠挑,犹宛转也。夫登升上天,示清高轻举;遨游云雾,表不滞其中;故能随变化而无穷,将造物而宛转者也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【释文】《挠》徐而少反,郭许尧反,《挑》徐徒了反,郭李徒尧反。又作兆。李云:挠挑,犹宛转也,宛转玄旷之中。简文云:循环之名。 【三】【注】忘其生,则无不忘矣,故能随变任化,俱无所穷竟。 徒尧反。又作兆。李云:挠挑,犹宛转也,宛转玄旷之中。简文云:循环之名。 【三】【注】忘其生,则无不忘矣,故能随变任化,俱无所穷竟。 【疏】终穷,死也。相与忘生复忘死,死生混一,故顺化而无穷也。 【四】【注】若然者岂友哉?盖寄明至亲而无爱念之近情也。 【疏】得意忘言,故相视而笑;智冥于境,故莫逆于心。方外道同,遂相与为友也。 【校】(一)世德堂本变作而,赵谏议本无夫字者字。(二)世德堂本官作管。赵本此两句作虽同,遂相与为友也。 【校】(一)世德堂本变作而,赵谏议本无夫字者字。(二)世德堂本官作管。赵本此两句作虽手足五脏异殊。 莫然有闲而子桑户死,未葬。孔子闻之,使子贡往侍(一)事焉【一】。或编曲,或鼓琴,相和而歌【二】曰:“嗟来桑户乎!嗟来桑户乎!而已反其真,而我犹为人猗【三】!”子贡趋而进曰:“敢问临尸而歌,礼乎【四】?”No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【一】【疏】莫,无也。三人相视,寂尔无言。俄顷之闲,子桑户死。仲尼闻之,使子贡往而吊,仍令供给丧事,将迎宾客。欲显方外方内,故寄尼父琴张。 【释文】《莫然》如字。崔云:定也。《有闲》如字。崔李云:顷也。本亦作为闲。◎庆藩案有,释文作为。为闲即有闲矣。古为有义通。孟子滕文公篇,将为君子焉,将为野人焉,赵岐注:为,有也,为闲即有闲矣。古为有义通。孟子滕文公篇,将为君子焉,将为野人焉,赵岐注:为,有也,虽小国亦有君子野人也。又弟子怃然为闲,注:为闲,有顷之闲也。又尽心篇为闲不用,注:为闲,有闲也。又梁惠王篇善推其所为而已矣,说苑贵德篇引孟子为作有。燕策故不敢为辞说,新序杂事篇为作有。皆其证。 【二】【疏】曲,薄也。或编薄织帘,或鼓琴歌咏,相和欢乐,曾无戚容。所谓相忘以生,方外之至也。 【释文】《编曲》必连反,字林布千反,郭父殄反,史记甫连反。李云:曲,蚕薄。《相和》胡卧反。 【三】【注】人哭亦哭,俗内之迹也。齐死生,忘哀乐,临尸能歌,方外之至也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【疏】嗟来,歌声也。桑户乎以下,相和之辞也。猗,相和声也。夫从无出有,名之曰生;自有还无,名之曰死。汝今既还空乎以下,相和之辞也。猗,相和声也。夫从无出有,名之曰生;自有还无,名之曰死。汝今既还空寂,便是归本反真,而我犹寄人闲,羁旅未还桑梓。欲齐一死生,而发斯猗叹者也。◎李桢曰:嗟来是歌声,却是叹辞。释名释言语:嗟,佐也;言之不足以尽意,故发此声以自佐也。来,哀也;(故)〔使〕(二)来入已哀之,故其言之低头以招之也。孟子反子琴张叹桑户之得已反真,故为此歌也。 【释文】《我犹》崔本作独。《人猗》于宜反。崔云,辞也。《哀乐》音洛。 【四】【疏】方内之礼,贵在节文,邻里有丧,舂文】《我犹》崔本作独。《人猗》于宜反。崔云,辞也。《哀乐》音洛。 【四】【疏】方内之礼,贵在节文,邻里有丧,舂犹不相。况临朋友之尸,曾无哀哭,琴歌自若,岂是礼乎?子贡怪其如此,故趋走进问也。 【校】(一)世德堂本侍作待。阙误引张君房本作侍。(二)使字依释名改。 二人相视而笑曰:“是恶知礼意【一】!”No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【一】【注】夫知礼意者,必游外以经内,守母以存子,称情而直往也。若乃矜乎名声,牵乎形制,则孝不任诚,慈不任实,父子兄弟,怀情相欺,岂礼之大意哉! 【疏】夫大礼与天地同节,不拘制乎形名,直致任真,率情而往,况冥同生死,岂存哀乐于胸中!而子贡方内儒生,性犹偏执,唯贵粗迹,未契妙本。如是之人,于何知礼之深乎!为方外所嗤,固其宜矣。 【况冥同生死,岂存哀乐于胸中!而子贡方内儒生,性犹偏执,唯贵粗迹,未契妙本。如是之人,于何知礼之深乎!为方外所嗤,固其宜矣。 【释文】《恶知》音乌,下皆同。《称情》尺证反。 子贡反,以告孔子,曰:“彼何人者邪?修行无有,而外其形骸,临尸而歌,颜色不变,无以命之。彼何人者邪?”【一】 【一】【疏】命,名也。子贡使返,且告尼父云:彼二人情事难识,修己德行,无有礼仪,而忘外形骸,混同生死,临丧歌乐,神形不变。既莫测其道,故难以名之。 【释文】《无以命之》崔李云:命,名也。 孔子曰:“彼,游方之外者也;而丘,游方之内者也【一】。外内不相及,而丘使女往吊之,丘则陋矣【二】。彼方且与造物者命,名也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
孔子曰:“彼,游方之外者也;而丘,游方之内者也【一】。外内不相及,而丘使女往吊之,丘则陋矣【二】。彼方且与造物者为人,而游乎天地之一气【三】。彼以生为附赘县疣【四】,以死为决肒(一)溃痈【五】,夫若然者,又恶知死生先后之所在【六】!假于异物,托于同体【七】;忘其肝胆,遗其耳目【八】;反复终始,不知端倪【九】;芒然彷徨乎尘垢之外,逍遥乎无为之业【一0】。彼又恶能愦愦然为世俗之礼,以观众人之耳目哉【一一】!”No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【一】【端倪【九】;芒然彷徨乎尘垢之外,逍遥乎无为之业【一0】。彼又恶能愦愦然为世俗之礼,以观众人之耳目哉【一一】!” 【一】【注】夫理有至极,外内相冥,未有极游外之致而不冥于内者也,未有能冥于内而不游于外者也。故圣人常游外以(宏)〔冥〕(二)内,无心以顺有,故虽终日(挥)〔见〕(三)形而神气无变,俯仰万机而淡然自若。夫见形而不及神者,天下之常累也。是故睹其与群物并行,则莫能谓之遗物而离人矣;睹其体化而应务,则莫能谓之坐忘而自得矣。岂直谓圣人不然哉?乃必谓至理之无此。是故庄子将明流统之所宗以释天下之可悟,若直就称仲尼之如此,或者将人不然哉?乃必谓至理之无此。是故庄子将明流统之所宗以释天下之可悟,若直就称仲尼之如此,或者将据所见以排之,故超圣人之内迹,而寄方外于数子。宜忘其所寄以寻述作之大意,则夫游外(宏)〔冥〕内之道坦然自明,而庄子之书,故是涉俗盖世之谈矣。 【疏】方,区域也。彼之二人,齐一死生,不为教迹所拘,故游心寰宇之外。而仲尼子贡,命世大儒,行裁非之义,服节文之礼,锐意哀乐之中,游心区域之内,所以为异也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【释文】《而淡》徒暂反。《而离》力智反,下同。《而应》应对之应。下同。《数子》所主反。《坦然》吐但反。◎庆藩案文选谢灵运之郡初发都诗注夏侯孝若东方力智反,下同。《而应》应对之应。下同。《数子》所主反。《坦然》吐但反。◎庆藩案文选谢灵运之郡初发都诗注夏侯孝若东方朔赞注,并引司马云:方,常也,言彼游心于常教之外也。释文阙。 【二】【注】夫吊者,方内之近事也,施之于方外则陋矣。 【疏】玄儒理隔,内外道殊,胜劣而论,不相及逮。用区中之俗礼,吊方外之高人,刍狗再陈,鄙陋之甚也。 【释文】《使女》音汝。下同。 【三】【注】皆冥之,故无二也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【疏】达阴阳之变化,与造物之为人;体万物之混同,游二仪之一气也。◎王引之曰:应帝王篇,予方将与造物者为人,郭曰:任人之自为。天运篇,丘不与化为人,郭曰:夫与化为人者,任其自化者也。案郭未晓人字之义。人,偶也;为人,犹为偶。中庸仁者人也,(郭)〔郑〕(四)注:读如相人偶之人,以人意相存偶之言。诗匪风笺:人偶能偶。中庸仁者人也,(郭)〔郑〕(四)注:读如相人偶之人,以人意相存偶之言。诗匪风笺:人偶能割亨者,人偶能辅周道治民者。聘礼注:每门辄揖者,以相人偶为敬也。公食大夫礼注:每曲揖及当碑揖相人偶。是人与偶同义,故汉世有相人偶之语。淮南原道篇,与造化者为人,义与此同。(高注:为治也,非是。互见淮南。)齐俗篇曰:上与神明为友,下与造化为人。是其明证也。◎庆藩案文选颜延年三月三日曲水诗序注引司马云:造物者为道。任彦升到大司马记室笺注、宣德皇后令注、陆佐公石关铭注、沈休文齐故安陆昭王碑文注并引司马云:造物,谓道也。释文阙。 【四】【注】若疣之室笺注、宣德皇后令注、陆佐公石关铭注、沈休文齐故安陆昭王碑文注并引司马云:造物,谓道也。释文阙。 【四】【注】若疣之自县,赘之自附,此气之时聚,非所乐也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【释文】《县》音玄。注同。《疣》音尤。 【五】【注】若肒之自决,廱之自溃,此气之自散,非所惜也。 【疏】彼三子体道之人,达于死生,冥于变化。是以气聚而生,譬疣赘附县,非所乐也;气散而死,若肒痈决溃,非所惜也。 【释文】《决》徐古穴反。《肒》胡乱反。◎卢文弨曰:今本正文亦作疣(尤改丸),音义作疣,胡虬反,恐臆改。《溃》胡对反。◎庆藩案慧琳一切经音义卷十六大方广三戒经下引司马云:浮热为疽,不通为痈。卷三十持人菩萨经二、卷三十七准提陀罗尼经、九十五正诬经注引并同。释文阙。 【六】【注热为疽,不通为痈。卷三十持人菩萨经二、卷三十七准提陀罗尼经、九十五正诬经注引并同。释文阙。 【六】【注】死生代谢,未始有极,与之俱往,则无往不可,故不知胜负之所在也。 【疏】先,胜也。后,劣也。夫疣赘□痈,四者皆是疾,而气有聚散,病无胜负。若以此方于生死,亦安知优劣之所在乎! 【七】【注】假,因也。今死生聚散,变化无方,皆异物也。无异而不假,故所假虽异而共成一体也。 【疏】水火金木,异物相假,众诸寄托,共成一身。是知形体,由来虚伪。 【八】【注】任之于理而冥往也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【疏】既知形质虚假,无可欣爱,故能内则忘于脏腑,外则忘其根窍故也。 【九】【注】五藏犹忘,何物足识哉!未始有识,故能,故能内则忘于脏腑,外则忘其根窍故也。 【九】【注】五藏犹忘,何物足识哉!未始有识,故能放任于变化之涂,玄同于反复之波,而不知终始之所极(五)也。 【疏】端,绪也。倪,畔也。反复,犹往来也。终始,犹生死也。既忘其形质,隳体绌聪,故能去来生死,与化俱往。化又无极,故莫知端倪。 【释文】《反复》芳服反。《端倪》本或作淣,同。音崖。徐音诣。 【一0】【注】所谓无为之业,非拱默而已;所谓尘垢之外,非伏于山林也。 【疏】芒然,无知之貌也。彷徨逍遥《端倪》本或作淣,同。音崖。徐音诣。 【一0】【注】所谓无为之业,非拱默而已;所谓尘垢之外,非伏于山林也。 【疏】芒然,无知之貌也。彷徨逍遥,皆自得逸豫之名也。尘垢,色声等有为之物也。前既遗于形骸,此又忘于心智,是以放任于尘累之表,逸豫于清旷之乡,以此无为而为事业也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【释文】《芒然》莫刚反。李云:无系之貌。《彷》薄刚反。《徨》音皇。《尘垢》如字。崔本作冢□,云:冢,音□;□,垢同。齐人以风尘为□。◎卢文弨曰:旧□作逢,今本作摓,乃□字之讹,今改正。 【一一】【注】其所以观示于众人者,皆其尘垢耳,非方外之冥物也。 【疏】愦愦,犹烦乱也。彼数子者,清一一】【注】其所以观示于众人者,皆其尘垢耳,非方外之冥物也。 【疏】愦愦,犹烦乱也。彼数子者,清高虚淡,安排去化,率性任真。何能强事节文,拘世俗之礼;威仪显示,悦众人之视听哉! 【释文】《愦愦》工内反,说文、苍颉篇并云:乱也,《以观》古乱反,示也。注同。 【校】(一)世德堂本肒作疣,注同。(二)冥字依赵谏议本改。下同。世德堂本上冥字误作私,下冥字误作弘。(三)见字依世德堂本改。(四)郑字依中庸注改。(五)世德堂本极作及。 子贡曰:“然则夫子何方之依【一】?” 【一】【注】子贡不闻性与天道,故见其所依而不见其所以依也。夫所以依者,不】?” 【一】【注】子贡不闻性与天道,故见其所依而不见其所以依也。夫所以依者,不依也,世岂觉之哉! 【疏】方内方外,浅深不同,未知夫子依从何道。师资起发,故设此疑。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
孔子曰:“丘,天之戮民也【一】。虽然,吾与汝共之【二】。” 【一】【注】以方内为桎梏,明所贵在方外也。夫游外者依内,离人者合俗,故有天下者无以天下为也。是以遗物而后能入群,坐忘而后能应务,愈遗之,愈得之。苟居斯极,则虽欲释之而理固自来,斯乃天人之所不赦者也。 【疏】夫圣迹礼仪,乃桎梏形性。仲尼既依方内,则是自然之理,刑戮之人也。故德充符篇云,天刑之安可解乎。 【二】【注】虽为世所桎梏,但为与汝共之耳。明己恒自在外也。 【疏】夫孔子圣人,和光戮之人也。故德充符篇云,天刑之安可解乎。 【二】【注】虽为世所桎梏,但为与汝共之耳。明己恒自在外也。 【疏】夫孔子圣人,和光接物,扬波同世,贵斯俗礼;虽复降迹方内,与汝共之,而游心方外,萧然无着也。 子贡曰:“敢问其方【一】。” 【一】【注】问所以游外而共内之意。 【疏】方,犹道也。问:“迹混域中,心游方外,外内玄合,其道若何?” 孔子曰:“鱼相造乎水,人相造乎道【一】。相造乎水者,穿池而养给;相造乎道也。问:“迹混域中,心游方外,外内玄合,其道若何?”No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
孔子曰:“鱼相造乎水,人相造乎道【一】。相造乎水者,穿池而养给;相造乎道者,无事而生定【二】。故曰,鱼相忘乎江湖,人相忘乎道术【三】。” 【一】【疏】造,诣也。鱼之所诣者,适性莫过深水;人之所至者,得意莫过道术。虽复情智不一,而相与皆然。此略标义端,次下解释也。 【释文】《相造》七报反,诣也。下同。 【二】【注】所造虽异,其于由无事以得事,自方外以共内,解释也。 【释文】《相造》七报反,诣也。下同。 【二】【注】所造虽异,其于由无事以得事,自方外以共内,然后养给而生定,则莫不皆然也。俱不自知耳,故成无为也。 【疏】此解释前义也。夫江湖淮海,皆名天池。鱼在大水之中,窟穴泥沙,以自资养供给也;亦犹人处大道之中,清虚养性,无事逍遥,故得性分静定而安乐也。 【释文】《穿池》本亦作地,崔同。◎俞樾曰:定疑足字之误。穿池而养给,无事而生足,两句一律。给,亦足也。足与定,字形相似而误。管子中匡篇:功定以得天与失天,其人事一也。今本定误作足,与此正可互证。 【三】【注】各自足而相忘者,天下莫不然也。至人常足,故常忘也。失天,其人事一也。今本定误作足,与此正可互证。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【三】【注】各自足而相忘者,天下莫不然也。至人常足,故常忘也。 【疏】此结释前义也。夫深水游泳,各足相忘;道术内充,偏爱斯绝;岂与夫呴濡仁义同年而语哉!临尸而歌,其义亦尔故也。 【释文】《相忘》音亡。下同。 子贡曰:“敢问畸人【一】。” 【一】【注】问向之所谓方外而不耦于俗者,又安在也。 【疏】畸者,不耦之名也。修行无有,而疏外形体,乖异人伦,不耦于俗。敢问此人,其道如何? 【释文】《畸人》居宜反。司马云:不耦也。不耦于人,谓阙于礼教也。李其宜反,云:奇异也。 曰:“畸人者,畸于人而侔于天【一】】《畸人》居宜反。司马云:不耦也。不耦于人,谓阙于礼教也。李其宜反,云:奇异也。 曰:“畸人者,畸于人而侔于天【一】。故曰,天之小人,人之君子;人之君子,天之小人也【二】。” 【一】【注】夫与内冥者,游于外也。独能游外以冥内,任万物之自然,使天性各足而帝王道成,斯乃畸于人而侔于天也。 【疏】自此已下,孔子答子贡也。侔者,等也,同也。夫不修仁义,不偶于物,而率其本性者,与自然之理同也。 【释文】《而侔》音谋。司马云:等也,亦从也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【二】【注】以自然言之,则人无小大(一);以人理言之,则侔于天者可谓君子矣。 【疏】夫怀仁履义为君子,乖道背德为从也。 【二】【注】以自然言之,则人无小大(一);以人理言之,则侔于天者可谓君子矣。 【疏】夫怀仁履义为君子,乖道背德为小人也。是以行蹩躠之仁,用踶跂之义者,人伦谓之君子,而天道谓之小人也。故知子反琴张,不偶于俗,乃曰畸人,实天之君子。重言之者,复结其义也。 【校】(一)赵谏议本大作人。 颜回问仲尼曰:“孟孙才,其母死,哭泣无涕,中心不戚,居丧不哀。无是三者,以善处(一)丧【一】盖鲁国。固有无其实而得其名者乎?回壹(二)怪之【二】。” 【一】【疏】姓孟孙,名才,鲁之贤人。体无为之一道,知生死盖鲁国。固有无其实而得其名者乎?回壹(二)怪之【二】。” 【一】【疏】姓孟孙,名才,鲁之贤人。体无为之一道,知生死之不二,故能迹同方内,心游物表。居母氏之丧,礼数不阙,威仪详雅,甚有孝容;而泪不滂沱,心不悲戚,声不哀痛。三者既无,不名孝子,而乡邦之内,悉皆善之,云其处丧深得礼法也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【释文】《孟孙才》李云:三桓后,才其名也。崔云:才,或作牛。◎李桢曰:以善处丧绝句,文义未完,且嫌于不辞。下盖鲁国三字当属上为句,不当连下固有云云为句。盖与应帝王篇功盖天下义同,言孟孙才以善处丧名盖鲁国。尔雅释言:弇,盖也。小尔不当连下固有云云为句。盖与应帝王篇功盖天下义同,言孟孙才以善处丧名盖鲁国。尔雅释言:弇,盖也。小尔雅广诂:盖,覆也。释名释言语:盖,加也。并有高出其上之意,即此盖字义也。 【二】【注】鲁国观其礼,而颜回察其心。 【疏】盖者,发语之辞也。哭泣缞绖,同域中之俗礼;心无哀戚,契方外之忘怀。鲁人睹其外迹,故有善丧之名;颜子察其内心,知无至孝之实。所以一见孟孙才,遂生疑怪也。 【校】(一)世德堂本无处字。(二)世德堂本壹作一。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
仲尼曰:“夫孟孙氏尽之矣,进于知矣【一】。唯简之而不得,【二】夫已有所简矣。孟孙氏不知所以生,不知所以死【三】;不知就先,不知就后【四】;若化为物【五】,以待其所不知之化已乎!【六】且方将化,恶知不化哉?方将不化,恶知已化哉【七】?吾特与汝,其梦未始觉者邪【八】!且彼有骇形而无为物【五】,以待其所不知之化已乎!【六】且方将化,恶知不化哉?方将不化,恶知已化哉【七】?吾特与汝,其梦未始觉者邪【八】!且彼有骇形而无损心【九】,有旦宅而无情死【一0】。孟孙氏特觉,人哭亦哭,是自其所以乃(一)【一一】。且也相与吾之耳矣【一二】,庸讵知吾所谓吾之乎【一三】?且汝梦为鸟而厉乎天,梦为鱼而没于渊【一四】。不识今之言者,其觉者乎,其梦者乎【一五】?造适不及笑,献笑不及排【一六】,安排而去化,乃入于寥天一【一七】。” 【一】【注】尽死生之理,应内外之宜者,动而以天行,非知之匹也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【疏】进,过也。七】。” 【一】【注】尽死生之理,应内外之宜者,动而以天行,非知之匹也。 【疏】进,过也。夫孟孙氏穷哀乐之本,所以无乐无哀;尽生死之源,所以忘生忘死。既而本迹难测,故能合内外之宜;应物无心,岂是运知之匹者耶! 【释文】《应内》应对之应。 【二】【注】简择死生而不得其异,若春秋冬夏四时行耳。 【疏】夫生来死去,譬彼四时,故孟孙简择,不得其异。 【三】【注】已简而不得,故无不安,无不安,故不以生死概意而付之自化也。 【疏】虽复有所简择,竟不知生死之异,故能安于变化而不以哀乐概怀也。 【四】【注】所遇而安。 【五】【注】不违化也。 【疏】先,生也。后,死也。若,顺也。既一于死生,故无不以哀乐概怀也。 【四】【注】所遇而安。 【五】【注】不违化也。 【疏】先,生也。后,死也。若,顺也。既一于死生,故无去无就;冥于变化,故顺化为物也。 【六】【注】死生宛转,与化为一,犹乃忘其所知于当今,岂待所未知而豫忧者哉! 【疏】不知之化,谓当来未化之事也。已,止也。见在之生,犹自忘遣;况未来之化,岂复逆忧!若用心预待,不如止而勿为也。 【七】【注】已化而生,焉知未生之时哉!未化而死,焉知已死之后哉!故无所避就,而与化俱往(二)也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【疏】方今正化为人,安知过去未化之事乎!正在化而死,焉知已死之后哉!故无所避就,而与化俱往(二)也。 【疏】方今正化为人,安知过去未化之事乎!正在生日未化而死,又安知死后之事乎!俱当推理直前,与化俱往,无劳在生忧死,妄为欣恶也。 【释文】《恶知》音乌,下同。《焉知》于虔反。下皆同。 【八】【注】夫死生犹觉梦耳,今梦自以为觉,则无以明觉之非梦也;苟无以明觉之非梦,则亦无以明生之非死矣。死生觉梦,未知所在,当其所遇,无不自得,何为在此而忧彼哉! 【疏】梦是昏睡之时,觉是了知之日。仲尼颜子,犹拘名教,为昏于大梦之得,何为在此而忧彼哉! 【疏】梦是昏睡之时,觉是了知之日。仲尼颜子,犹拘名教,为昏于大梦之中,不达死生,未尝暂觉者也。 【释文】《觉者》古孝反。注、下皆同。 【九】【注】以(三)变化为形之骇动耳,故不以死生损累其心。 【疏】彼之孟孙,冥于变化,假见生死为形之惊动,终无哀乐损累心神也。 【释文】《骇形》如字。崔作咳,云:有婴儿之形。 【一0】【注】以形骸之变为旦宅之日新耳,其情不以为死。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【疏】旦,日新也。宅者,神之舍也。以形之改变为宅舍之日新耳,其性灵】以形骸之变为旦宅之日新耳,其情不以为死。 【疏】旦,日新也。宅者,神之舍也。以形之改变为宅舍之日新耳,其性灵凝淡,终无死生之累者也。 【释文】《旦宅》并如字。王云,旦暮改易,宅是神居也。李本作怛,上丹末反,下陟嫁反,云:惊惋之貌。崔本作靼宅。靼,怛也。 【一一】【注】夫常觉者,无往而有逆也,故人哭亦哭,正自是其所宜也(四)。 【疏】孟孙冥同生死,独居觉悟,应于内外,不乖人理。人哭亦哭,自是顺物之宜者也。 【释文】《所以乃》崔本乃作恶。 【一二】【注】夫死生变化,孙冥同生死,独居觉悟,应于内外,不乖人理。人哭亦哭,自是顺物之宜者也。 【释文】《所以乃》崔本乃作恶。 【一二】【注】夫死生变化,吾皆吾之。既皆是吾,吾何失哉!未始失吾,吾何忧哉(五)!无逆,故人哭亦哭;无忧,故哭而不哀。 【疏】吾生吾死,相与皆吾,未始非吾,吾何所失!若以系吾为意,何适非吾! 【一三】【注】靡所不吾也,故玄同外内,弥贯古今,与化日新,岂知吾之所在也!No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【疏】庸,常也。凡常之人,识见浅狭,讵知吾之所谓无处非吾!假令千变万化,而吾常在,新吾故吾,何欣何恶也! 【释文】《庸讵》其庶反。下章同。 【一四】【注】言无往而不自得也。 【一五】【注】梦之时自以为觉,则焉知今者之非梦耶,亦焉知其非觉耶?觉梦之化,无往而不可,则死生之变,无时而足惜也。 【疏】厉,至也。且为 【一五】【注】梦之时自以为觉,则焉知今者之非梦耶,亦焉知其非觉耶?觉梦之化,无往而不可,则死生之变,无时而足惜也。 【疏】厉,至也。且为鱼为鸟,任性逍遥,处死处生,居然自得。而鱼鸟既无优劣,死生亦何胜负而系之哉!孟孙妙达斯源,所以未尝介意。又不知今之所论鱼鸟者,为是觉中而辩,为是梦中而说乎?夫人梦中,自以为觉;今之觉者,何妨梦中!是知觉梦生死,未可定也。 【一六】【注】所造皆适,则忘适矣,故不及笑也。排者,推移之谓也。夫礼哭必哀觉;今之觉者,何妨梦中!是知觉梦生死,未可定也。 【一六】【注】所造皆适,则忘适矣,故不及笑也。排者,推移之谓也。夫礼哭必哀,献笑必乐,哀乐存怀,则不能与适推移矣。今孟孙常适,故哭而不哀,与化俱往也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【疏】造,至也。献,善也。排,推移也。夫所至皆适,斯亦适也,其常适何及欢笑然后乐哉!若从善事感己而后适者,此则不能随变任化,与物推移也。今孟孙常适,故哭而不哀也。 【释文】《造适》七报反。注同。《献笑》向云:献,善也。王云:章也,意有适,章于笑,故曰献笑。◎家世父曰:造适者,以心取适而已,言笑皆忘也。献笑者,以笑为欢而已,推排皆化也。极推排之力而冥然安之,穷变化之用而超然去之,乃以游荡于万物之表而与天为一。《及排》皮皆反。《必乐》音洛。下同。 【一七】【注】安于推移而与化俱去,故荡于万物之表而与天为一。《及排》皮皆反。《必乐》音洛。下同。 【一七】【注】安于推移而与化俱去,故乃入于寂寥而与天为一也。自此以上,至于子祀,其致一也。所执之丧异,故歌哭不同。 【疏】所在皆适,故安任推移,未始非吾,而与化俱去。如此之人,乃能入于寥廓之妙门,自然之一道也。 【释文】《寥》本亦作廖,力雕反。李良救反。《天一》崔本作造敌不及笑,献芥不及 ,安排而造化不及眇,眇不及雄漂淰,雄漂淰不及簟筮,簟筮乃入于漻天一。《以上》时掌反。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【校】(一)朱桂。《天一》崔本作造敌不及笑,献芥不及 ,安排而造化不及眇,眇不及雄漂淰,雄漂淰不及簟筮,簟筮乃入于漻天一。《以上》时掌反。 【校】(一)朱桂曜本乃作盈。(二)世德堂本往作生。(三)世德堂本以作似。(四)赵谏议本无注首夫字,注末也字。(五)世德堂本是吾作自吾,两哉字均作矣。 意而子见许由。许由曰:“尧何以资汝【一】?” 【一】【注】资者,给济之谓也。 【疏】意而,古之贤人。资,给济之谓也。意而先谒帝尧,后见仲武。问云:“帝尧大圣,道德甚高,汝既谒见,有何敬授资济之术,幸请陈说耳。” 【释文】《意而子》李意而先谒帝尧,后见仲武。问云:“帝尧大圣,道德甚高,汝既谒见,有何敬授资济之术,幸请陈说耳。” 【释文】《意而子》李云:贤士也。《资汝》资,给也。 意而子曰:“尧谓我:‘汝必躬服仁义而明言是非【一】。'” 【一】【疏】躬,身也。仁则恩慈育物,义则断割裁非,是则明赏其善,非则明惩其恶。此之四者,人伦所贵,汝必须己身服行,亦须明言示物。此是意而述尧教语之辞也。 许由曰:“而奚来为轵【一】?夫尧既已黥汝以仁义,而劓汝以是非矣,汝将何以游夫遥荡恣睢转徙之涂乎【二】?”No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【一】【疏】而,汝也。奚,何也。轵,语助也。尧将教迹刑害于汝,疮痕已大,何为更来矣? 【释文】《为轵》之是反,郭之忍反。崔云:轵,辞也。李云:是也。 【二】【注】言其将以刑教自亏残,而不能复游夫自得之场,无更来矣? 【释文】《为轵》之是反,郭之忍反。崔云:轵,辞也。李云:是也。 【二】【注】言其将以刑教自亏残,而不能复游夫自得之场,无系之涂也。 【疏】黥,凿额也。劓,割鼻也。恣睢,纵任也。转徙,变化也。涂,道也。夫仁义是非,损伤真性,其为残害,譬之刑戮。汝既被尧黥劓,拘束性情,如何复能遨游自得,逍遥放荡,从容自适于变化之道乎?言其不复能如是。 【释文】《黥》其京反。《劓》鱼器反。李云:毁道德以为仁义,不似黥乎!破玄同以为是非,不似劓乎!《遥荡》王云:纵散也。《恣》七咨反,又如字。《睢》郭李云:许维反,徐许鼻反。李王皆云:恣睢,自得貌。《复游》扶又反。下同。 意而子曰:“虽然,吾愿游于其藩【徐许鼻反。李王皆云:恣睢,自得貌。《复游》扶又反。下同。 意而子曰:“虽然,吾愿游于其藩【一】。” 【一】【注】不敢复求涉中道也,且愿游其藩傍而已。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【疏】我虽遭此亏残,而庶几之心靡替,不复敢当中路,愿涉道之藩傍也。 【释文】《其藩》甫烦反,李音烦。司马向皆云:崖也。崔云:域也。 许由曰:“不然。夫盲者无以与乎眉目颜色之好,瞽者无以与乎青黄黼黻之观【一】。” 【一】【疏】盲者,有眼睛而不见物;瞽者,眼无眹缝如鼓皮也。作斧形谓之黼,两己相背谓之黻。而盲瞽之人,眼睛已败,既不能观文彩青黄,亦不无眹缝如鼓皮也。作斧形谓之黼,两己相背谓之黻。而盲瞽之人,眼睛已败,既不能观文彩青黄,亦不爱好眉目颜色。譬意而遭尧黥劓,情智已伤,岂能爱慕深玄,观览众妙邪! 【释文】《盲者》本又作眇。崔本作目,云:目,或作刑。刑,黥劓也。《以与》音豫。下同。《之好》如字,又呼报反。《黼黻》上音甫,下音弗。《观》古乱反。 意而子曰:“夫无庄之失其美,据梁之失其力,黄帝之亡其知,皆在炉捶(一)之间耳【一】。庸讵知夫造物者之不息我黥而补我劓,使我乘成以随先生邪【二】?”No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【一】【注】言天下之物,未)之间耳【一】。庸讵知夫造物者之不息我黥而补我劓,使我乘成以随先生邪【二】?” 【一】【注】言天下之物,未必皆自成也,自然之理,亦有须冶锻而为器者耳。故此之三人,亦皆闻道而后忘其所务也。此皆寄言,以遣云为之累耳。 【疏】无庄,古之美人,为闻道故,不复庄饰,而自忘其美色也。据梁,古之多力人,为闻道守雌,故不勇其力也。黄帝,轩辕也,有圣知,亦为闻道,故能忘遣其知也。炉,灶也。锤,锻也。以上三人,皆因闻道,然后忘其所务以契其真,犹如世间器物,假于炉冶打锻以成其用者锤,锻也。以上三人,皆因闻道,然后忘其所务以契其真,犹如世间器物,假于炉冶打锻以成其用者耳。今何妨自然之理,令夫子教示于我,以成其道耶?故知自然造物,在炉冶之间,则是有修学冶锻之义也。 【释文】《无庄据梁》司马云:皆人名。李云:无庄,无庄饰也。据梁,强梁也。《炉》音卢。《捶》本又作锤。徐之睡反,又之反,一音时反。李云:锤,鸱头颇口,句铁以吹火也。崔云:卢谓之瓮。捶当作甀。卢甀之间,言小处也。甀音丈伪反。《锻》丁乱反。 【二】【注】夫率性(二)直往者,自然也;往而伤性,性伤而能改者,亦自然也。庸讵知我(三)之自然当不息黥补劓反。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【二】【注】夫率性(二)直往者,自然也;往而伤性,性伤而能改者,亦自然也。庸讵知我(三)之自然当不息黥补劓,而乘可成之道以随夫子耶?而欲弃而勿告,恐非造物之至也(四)。 【疏】造物,犹造化也。我虽遭仁义是非残伤情性,焉知造化之内,不补劓息黥,令我改过自新,乘可成之道,随夫子以请益耶?乃欲弃而不教,恐乖造物者也。◎庆藩案乘,犹载也。成,犹□也。与诗仪既成兮义同。黥劓则形体不备,息之补之,复完成矣。言造物者使我得遇先生,安知不使我载一成体以相随耶?此兼采宣氏说,较郭训为长。 【校】(一)赵谏议本捶作锤。(二)赵本性作然。(三)世德堂本知我作我知。(四)世德堂本无也字。 许由曰:“噫!未可知也。我为汝言其大略【一(一)赵谏议本捶作锤。(二)赵本性作然。(三)世德堂本知我作我知。(四)世德堂本无也字。 许由曰:“噫!未可知也。我为汝言其大略【一】。吾师乎!吾师乎!万物而不为义,泽及万世而不为仁【二】,长于上古而不为老【三】,覆载天地刻雕众形而不为巧【四】。此所游已【五】。”No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【一】【疏】噫,叹声也。至道深玄,绝于言象,不可以心虑测,故叹云未可知也。既请益殷懃,亦无容杜默,虽复不可言尽,为汝梗概陈之。 【释文】《曰噫》徐音医。李云:叹声也。崔云:乱也。本亦作意,音同。又如字,谓呼意而名也。《我为》于伪反。注同。 【二】【注】皆自尔耳,亦无爱为于其间也,安所寄其仁义! 【疏】吾师乎者,至道也。然至道不可心知,为汝略言其要,即吾师是也。,碎伪反。注同。 【二】【注】皆自尔耳,亦无爱为于其间也,安所寄其仁义! 【疏】吾师乎者,至道也。然至道不可心知,为汝略言其要,即吾师是也。,碎也。至如素秋霜降,碎落万物,岂有情断割而为义哉?青春和气,生育万物,岂有情恩爱而为仁哉?盖不然而然也。而许由师于至道,至道既其如是,汝何得躬服仁义耶?此略为意而说息黥补劓之方也。 【释文】《》子兮反。司马云:碎也。◎卢文弨曰:说文作□,亦作兖。陆每从敕,讹。今从隶省作。下并同。 【三】【注】日新也。 【释文】《长于》丁丈反。 【四】【注】自然,故非巧也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【疏】万象之前,先有此道,智德具足,故义说为长而实无长也。长既无矣,老岂有耶!欲明不长而长,老而不老,故长于上古而不为老也。虽复天覆地载,而以道为源,众形雕刻,咸资造化,同禀自然,故巧名斯灭。既其无而不为老也。虽复天覆地载,而以道为源,众形雕刻,咸资造化,同禀自然,故巧名斯灭。既其无老无巧,无是无非,汝何所明言耶? 【五】【注】游于不为而师于无师也。 【疏】吾师之所游心,止如此说而已。此则总结以前吾师之义是也。 颜回曰:“回益矣【一】。” 【一】【注】以损之为益也。 【疏】颜子禀教孔氏,服膺问道,觉己进益,呈解于师。损有益空,故以损为益也。 仲尼曰:“何谓也【一】?” 【一】【疏】既言益矣,有何意谓? 曰:“回忘仁义矣【一】。” 【一】【疏】忘兼爱之仁,遣裁非之义,所言益者,此之谓乎! 曰:“可矣,犹未也【一】。” 【一】【注】仁者,兼爱之迹;义者,成物之功。爱之非仁,仁迹行焉;成之非义,义功见焉。存夫矣,犹未也【一】。”No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
【一】【注】仁者,兼爱之迹;义者,成物之功。爱之非仁,仁迹行焉;成之非义,义功见焉。存夫仁义,不足以知爱利之由无心,故忘之可也。但忘功迹,故犹未玄达也。 【疏】仁义已忘,于理渐可;解心尚浅,所以犹未。 【释文】《功见》贤遍反。下文同。 他日,复见,曰:“回益矣【一】。” 【一】【疏】他日,犹异日也。空解日新,时更复见。所言进益,列在下文。 【释文】《他日》崔本作异日。下亦然。《复见》扶又反。下同。 曰:“何谓也【一】?” 【一】【疏】所言益者,是何意谓也? 曰:“回忘礼乐矣【一】。” 【一】【疏】礼者,荒乱之首,乐者,淫荡之具,为累 曰:“何谓也【一】?” 【一】【疏】所言益者,是何意谓也? 曰:“回忘礼乐矣【一】。” 【一】【疏】礼者,荒乱之首,乐者,淫荡之具,为累更重,次忘之也。 曰:“可矣,犹未也【一】。” 【一】【注】礼者,形体之用,乐者,乐生之具。忘其具,未若忘其所以具也。 【疏】虚心渐可,犹未至极也。 【释文】《乐生》音洛,又音岳。 他日,复见,曰:“回益矣。” 曰:“何谓也【一】?” 【一】【疏】并不异前解也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
曰:“回坐忘矣【一】。” 【一】【疏】虚心无着,故能端坐而忘。坐忘之义,具列在下文。◎庆藩案文选贾长沙鵩一】。” 【一】【疏】虚心无着,故能端坐而忘。坐忘之义,具列在下文。◎庆藩案文选贾长沙鵩鸟赋注引司马云:坐而自忘其身。释文阙。 仲尼蹴然曰:“何谓坐忘【一】?” 【一】【疏】蹴然,惊悚貌也,忘遗既深,故悚然惊叹。坐忘之谓,厥义云何也? 【释文】《蹴然》子六反。崔云:变色貌。 颜回曰:“堕肢体,黜聪明【一】,离形去知,同于大通,此谓坐忘【二】。” 【一】【疏】堕,毁废也。黜,退除也。虽聪属于耳,明关于目,而聪明之用,本乎心灵。既悟一身非有,万境皆空,故能毁废四肢百体,屏黜聪明心智者也。 【释文】《堕》许规反。徐又待果反。 【二】【注】夫坐忘者,奚所不忘哉!既忘其迹,又忘其所以迹者,内不觉其一身,外不识有天地,然后旷然与变化为体而无不通也。No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
又待果反。 【二】【注】夫坐忘者,奚所不忘哉!既忘其迹,又忘其所以迹者,内不觉其一身,外不识有天地,然后旷然与变化为体而无不通也。 【疏】大通,犹大道也。道能通生万物,故谓道为大通也。外则离析于形体,一一虚假,此解堕肢体也。内则除去心识,悗然无知,此解黜聪明也。既而枯木死灰,冥同大道,如此之益,谓之坐忘也。 【释文】《去》起吕反。《知》音智。《坐忘》崔云:端坐而忘。◎卢文弨曰:依次当在蹴然之前。 仲尼曰:“同则无好也【一】,化则无常也【二】。而果其贤乎!丘也请从而后也【三】。” 【一】【注】无物不同,则未尝不适,未尝不适,何好何恶】。而果其贤乎!丘也请从而后也【三】。” 【一】【注】无物不同,则未尝不适,未尝不适,何好何恶哉! 【释文】《无好》呼报反。注同。《何恶》乌No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.
路反Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback