中文 · EN

《老子说略》

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書 1 volumes 26,597 characters

About this page. The original text of 《老子说略》 (Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書, 1 volume) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 63 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

Vol. 1

老子说略 钦定四库全书 子部十四 老子说略 道家类 提要 (臣)等谨案老子说略二卷国朝张尔岐撰尔岐有仪礼郑注句读已着录道德经解者甚多往往缴绕穿凿自生障碍尔岐是编独屏除一切略为疏通大意其自序谓浏览本文读有未通輙以己意占度稍加一二言于句读隙间觉大义犂然迥视诸注勿计不能读亦已不欲读云云又有自跋称人问朱子道可道如可解应之曰道而可道则非常道名而可名则非常名朱子生平未尝解老使其解老此即其解老之法亦即可谓解一切诸书之法要在不执解求解反之是书以解是书而已云云盖其大旨在于涵泳本文自得理趣故不及纵横摧谲之谈亦不涉金丹黄白之术明白简当颇可以备参览焉 乾隆四十六年十月恭校上 总纂官(臣)纪昀(臣)陆锡熊(臣)孙士毅 总校官(臣可以备参览焉 乾隆四十六年十月恭校上 总纂官(臣)纪昀(臣)陆锡熊(臣)孙士毅 总校官(臣)陆费墀 ●老子说略序
Interpretation

An Abridged Discussion of Laozi

Imperially Commissioned Complete Library of the Four Treasuries

Section Fourteen of the Masters Division

An Abridged Discussion of Laozi

Daoist Works

Summary

We, your servants, have carefully examined and verified this work. An Abridged Discussion of Laozi consists of two volumes and was written by Zhang Erqi of the Qing dynasty. Zhang’s Sentence Divisions and Reading of Zheng Xuan’s Commentary on the Book of Etiquette and Ceremonial has already been recorded in the catalogue. Many books interpret the Dao De Jing; they often become elaborate and far-fetched, placing obstacles in the reader’s way. Zhang’s work avoids these approaches. It offers only a brief clarification of the text and explains its general meaning.

In his preface, Zhang says that when he read the original text and came upon passages that were difficult to follow, he made conjectures based on his own understanding and supplied a few words between the sentence divisions. In this way, he felt that the text’s general meaning suddenly became clear. As for other commentaries, he says that he neither intends to assess them nor wishes to read them.

In the postscript, he also recounts that someone once asked Zhu Xi how to explain “The Dao that can be spoken of.” Zhu Xi replied: “If the Dao can be spoken of, it is not the constant Dao; if a name can be named, it is not the constant name.” Zhu Xi never wrote a dedicated commentary on the Laozi. Zhang Erqi believes that if Zhu Xi had commented on the Laozi, this saying could have represented his method of interpretation—and could likewise have served as a method for reading all classics. The key is not to cling to the search for a fixed interpretation, but to return to the text itself. Zhang believes that his own book, too, uses the text to interpret the text.

The purpose of this work is to reflect repeatedly on the original text and grasp its principles. It therefore does not discuss political stratagems, sophistry, or unusual doctrines, nor does it touch on techniques such as refining the Golden Elixir or turning stone into gold. Its explanations are clear and concise, making it a useful reference for reading.

In the tenth month of the forty-sixth year of the Qianlong reign, respectfully revised and submitted.

Chief compilers: Ji Yun, Lu Xixiong, and Sun Shiyi.

Chief proofreader: Lu Feichi.

Preface to An Abridged Discussion of Laozi

老子明道德盖将治身以及天下与外常伦遗世事者异趣矣先儒审辨源流毎有论驳至清静不争之旨则莫或异议彼好之者欲以先六经固不可若槩以浮屠神仙之属等斥之不已过乎注者纷纷务矜新异各以其胸中所见之老子为老子非必西周柱下之老子而老子殆将隐矣譬之水瀹茗则苦渍蔗则甘和醢则酸投盐则咸杂橘橙姜桂则又橘橙姜桂谓水味本尔不诬水乎今夏偶及是书目力衰甚苦不能读细注浏览本文而已读有未通辄以己意占度稍加一二言于句读隙间觉大义犁然回视诸注勿计不能读亦已不欲读矣因自注浏览本文而已读有未通辄以己意占度稍加一二言于句读隙间觉大义犁然回视诸注勿计不能读亦已不欲读矣因自笑曰贫者啜水乃厌酒醴之为烦此岂可与言天下之备味哉虽然属餍之余激喉涤齿亦未必不有取于斯也因录而存之曰说略 康熙八年己酉夏五月望后一日济阳张尔岐题 ●钦定四库全书 老子说略卷上 济阳张尔岐撰 ○上篇 道可道非常道名可名非常名无名天地之始有名万物之母故常无欲以观其妙常有欲以观其徼此两者同出而异名同谓之玄玄之又玄众妙之门【徼音教】 道之可得而道者非常道也常道不可得而道也常道不可得而道又可得而名乎名之可得而名者亦非常道之名也夫此不可得而名者乃天地之所自徼音教】
Interpretation

The “Dao” and “De” described in the Laozi probably concern both self-cultivation and the governance of the realm. Their purpose is quite different from teachings that withdraw from worldly affairs and depart from ordinary principles. Earlier Confucian scholars examined and debated the text’s origins and development, often criticizing it; yet few objected to its central teaching of quietude and non-contention.

Those who admire the Laozi and wish to place it above the Six Classics (the Confucian classics) are surely mistaken. But to dismiss it wholesale as belonging to the same category as Buddhism and the arts of the immortals may also go too far. Commentators have vied to say something novel, each taking the Laozi in their own imagination to be the real Laozi. He may not be the Laozi who served as Keeper of the Archives in the Western Zhou. The Laozi’s original intent may have been obscured as a result.

It is like water: when used to steep tea, it takes on a bitter taste; when used to soak sugarcane, it becomes sweet; when mixed with meat sauce, it turns sour; when salt is added, it becomes salty. Mix in tangerines, oranges, ginger, and cinnamon, and it takes on those flavors too. To say that water had all these tastes to begin with would be to wrong it, would it not?

This summer, I happened upon this book. My eyesight has grown very poor, and I truly could not manage the dense commentaries, so I could only skim the main text. Where I could not make sense of a passage, I guessed at its meaning and added a word or two here and there to clarify the punctuation. In doing so, I felt that the gist of the whole book suddenly became clear. When I later looked again at the various commentaries, I remembered that I could no longer read them with ease and no longer wished to try. I could not help mocking myself: “A poor man drinks only water, yet finds wine and fine liquor too much trouble. How can he talk with others about all the flavors under heaven?” Still, after a full meal and drink, water to moisten the throat and rinse the mouth may have its uses. So I copied out these readings and kept them, giving them the title A Brief Account.

On the day after the fifteenth day of the fifth lunar month, in the summer of the eighth year of the Kangxi reign, the year Jiyou (1669), inscribed by Zhang Erqi of Jiyang.

A Brief Account of the Laozi, Scroll One

Written by Zhang Erqi of Jiyang

Upper Part

A Dao that can be spoken is not the constant Dao; a name that can be named is not the constant name. The nameless is the beginning of Heaven and Earth; the named is the source of the myriad things. Therefore, by remaining constantly free of desire, one can observe the Dao’s subtlety; by remaining constantly in a state of desire, one can observe the boundaries and signs through which the myriad things appear. “Nonbeing” and “being” emerge from the same source, though they have different names. Both may be called profound. Profound upon profound: this is the gateway to all mysteries.

A Dao that can be put into words is not the constant Dao; the constant Dao cannot be fully expressed in words. Since the constant Dao cannot be fully expressed, how could a name define it? A name that can be given is not the name of the constant Dao. That which cannot be named is the very source from which Heaven and Earth arise.

道之可得而道者非常道也常道不可得而道也常道不可得而道又可得而名乎名之可得而名者亦非常道之名也夫此不可得而名者乃天地之所自始既有天地乃有可名此有可名者实万物所从生之母也道之自无而有如此故圣人之体道也常体其无将以观其无之妙不离乎有将以观其有之徼有无两者相为体用本非有二也特异名耳无者固玄也有者亦非迹同谓之玄也玄不足以尽之殆玄而又加玄焉此玄玄之中万理备具岂非众妙之门乎 可道之道与中庸自道之道同人之所可循以为行者也 或于常无欲常有欲绝句欲犹意也万理备具岂非众妙之门乎 可道之道与中庸自道之道同人之所可循以为行者也 或于常无欲常有欲绝句欲犹意也情也盖言无意之时观道之妙有意之时观道之徼愚谓方有欲则非无欲方无欲则非有欲何以云常无欲常有欲故断从有无字绝句 徼如边徼之徼物之尽处也朱子云如边界相似说那应接处盖事到尽处必有相承接底如下章美恶善不善之类人于此处留心方可处事苏子由曰凡远而无所至极者其色必玄故老子常以玄寄极也 朱子曰玄只是深远而至于黑窣窣地处那便是众妙所在 此篇全书之纲领后凡言道体者皆观其妙也常道也无名者也凡言应事者皆观其徼也非常道也有名者也
Interpretation

A “Dao” (the Way) that can be clearly stated and expressed in words is not the constant, unchanging Dao. The constant Dao cannot be fully conveyed in language and therefore cannot be completely spoken of. Since it cannot be fully expressed, how could it be given a definite name? What can be named is not the name of the constant Dao. The unnameable Dao is the source from which Heaven and Earth began; only after Heaven and Earth took shape did nameable things come into being. These named and formed things all emerge from the Dao, which is like their common mother.

This is how the Dao brings forth what has form and name from what is formless and nameless. Thus, sages who understand the Dao often apprehend its subtle depth through “nonbeing.” At the same time, they do not turn away from “being”: they observe its manifestation in the boundaries and changes of concrete things. “Nonbeing” and “being” depend on each other, expressing respectively the Dao’s substance and its function. They are not two different things in the first place, but simply have different names. “Nonbeing” is indeed profound, but “being” is not merely outward appearance either; both are called “mystery” (xuan), meaning deep and unfathomable. Yet “mystery” alone is not enough to describe the Dao’s full profundity, so it is called “mystery upon mystery.” Within this unfathomable Dao, every principle is present. Is it not the gateway from which the many mysteries arise?

“Dao that can be followed” and the “Dao that guides oneself” spoken of in the Doctrine of the Mean have the same meaning: they refer to principles that people can follow and put into practice.

Some people read “constantly without desire” and “constantly with desire” as two separate phrases, and explain “desire” as thought or feeling: when free of thought, one observes the Dao’s subtlety; when thought is present, one observes the boundaries and functions through which the Dao appears. In my view, when there is desire, there is no absence of desire; when there is no desire, there is no desire. It is therefore unsuitable to interpret the passage as presenting “constantly without desire” and “constantly with desire” as two parallel states. Here, “nonbeing” and “being” should instead be read as separate phrases.

The character jiao in “boundaries” means the limits or endpoints of things. Zhu Xi said that it is like a boundary: the place where things meet and connect with one another. When a matter reaches its endpoint, further changes often follow and connect to it, such as the beautiful and the ugly, the good and the not good discussed below. By paying attention at these junctures, people can handle matters appropriately. Su Zhe said that what is distant and without limits always appears mysterious in form, which is why Laozi often uses “mystery” to indicate a realm of extreme profundity and distance. Zhu Xi also said that “mystery” refers to a place so deep and distant that it is dark and difficult to discern, where the many mysteries are concealed.

This chapter is the guiding principle of the whole book. When later chapters discuss the substance of the Dao, they observe its subtlety through “nonbeing”; when they discuss responding to concrete matters, they observe its boundaries and manifestations through “being.” The constant Dao is nameless, whereas the Dao that guides action in particular situations has a name.

天下皆知美之为美斯恶已皆知善之为善斯不善已故有无相生难易相成长短相形高下相倾声音相和前后相随是以圣人处无为也 天下皆知美之为美斯恶已皆知善之为善斯不善已故有无相生难易相成长短相形高下相倾声音相和前后相随是以圣人处无为之事行不言之教万物作焉而不辞生而不有为而不恃成功而不居夫惟不居是以不去 天下皆知美之为美则将相与市之而美者非美矣天下皆知善之为善则将争自托之而善者非善矣本美也而反为恶本善也而反为不善若知其美而不美善而不善之故而善处之又将美者真美善者真善矣美与恶善与不善相为循环之理如此故有与无之相生难与易之相成长与短之相形高与下之相倾声与音之相和前与后之相随皆若是而已矣是以圣人知其然处无为之事行不言之教万物作于其之相成长与短之相形高与下之相倾声与音之相和前与后之相随皆若是而已矣是以圣人知其然处无为之事行不言之教万物作于其前美恶杂陈而未尝有所辞即生养万物而不自以为有经理万事而不自以为可恃至于功既成矣而犹不自居也夫惟其不自居是以功卒归之而不去此美不知其美善不知其善美与善之所由全也 此章前假即所谓观其徼也美之尽处有恶恶之尽处又有美有无之类皆然是以以下则观徼而得妙
Interpretation

Everyone in the world recognizes beauty, and ugliness thereby appears. Everyone recognizes goodness, and what is not good appears alongside it. Thus being and nonbeing give rise to each other; difficult and easy take shape in relation to each other; long and short set each other off; high and low depend on each other; sounds harmonize with one another; and what comes before is followed by what comes after.

So the sage acts through Wuwei (non-action, following the natural course of things without imposing unnecessary interference) and teaches without relying on words. When the myriad things arise, he does not turn them away. He nurtures them without claiming them as his own, acts without relying on his own ability, and completes his work without taking credit. Because he takes no credit, his achievements do not depart.

When everyone in the world recognizes beauty, people compete to proclaim themselves beautiful; in this way, what is called beauty loses its real beauty. When everyone recognizes goodness, people compete to call themselves good; in this way, what is called goodness is no longer truly good. What was originally beautiful may become ugly, and what was originally good may become not good. If we can understand why beauty contains what is not beautiful, and goodness contains what is not good, and conduct ourselves appropriately, then beauty can be truly beautiful and goodness truly good.

Beauty and ugliness, goodness and what is not good, change in this way, each giving rise to the other. Being and nonbeing, difficult and easy, long and short, high and low, sound and tone, what comes before and what comes after—all depend on each other and bring each other to completion in the same way. Understanding this, the sage acts through Wuwei and teaches without words. The myriad things come forth before him, and all manner of beauty and ugliness appear together, yet he rejects none of them. He nurtures the myriad things without claiming them as his own, governs all affairs without relying on his own ability, and, even after his work is complete, takes no credit. Because he takes no credit, his achievements ultimately belong to him and do not disappear. This is how, by refusing to proclaim beauty and goodness, one can preserve what is truly beautiful and good.

The first half of this chapter uses visible things to show how things appear in relation to one another. This is “observing their outward manifestations”—examining the boundaries and phenomena through which things become apparent. From there, one can go further and grasp the profound principle within.

不尚贤使民不争不贵难得之货使民不为盗不见可欲使心不乱是以圣人之治虚其心实其腹弱其志强其骨常使民无知无欲使夫知者不敢为也为无为则无不治【见音现】 上尚贤则民自表异而争于名不尚贤则不争矣上贵难得之货则民竞于利而至为盗常使民无知无欲使夫知者不敢为也为无为则无不治【见音现】 上尚贤则民自表异而争于名不尚贤则不争矣上贵难得之货则民竞于利而至为盗不贵难得之货则不为盗矣上见其可欲以示人则人皆欲得之而心乱不见可欲则民心不乱矣凡民之情如此是以圣人之治于华艳之事则务靖之于朴质之业则务充之是虚其心实其腹也于争竞之端则务塞之于自立之实则务崇之是弱其志强其骨也常使民无知而不起分别之见常使民无欲而不生贪得之心且使夫知巧之人不敢以私智小道乱吾之治焉其所为者唯顺民之性而无所为则天下无不治矣 心腹志骨四字皆借喻 道冲而用之或不盈渊兮似万物之宗挫其锐解其纷和其光同其尘湛兮似或存吾不知其谁之子象帝之先
Interpretation

Do not exalt the name of the worthy, and the people will not fight over reputation. Do not prize rare and precious goods, and the people will not be driven to steal. Do not display things that stir up desire, and people’s minds will remain undisturbed. Therefore, when the sage governs the world, the people’s minds are kept simple and their clothing and food sufficient. Their ambitions to outdo one another are weakened, while their sinews and strength are reinforced. The people are regularly kept free of clever distinctions and craving, and those who consider themselves clever are kept from acting recklessly. Govern by following the Dao of Wuwei (non-action), and nothing in the world will be left ungov­erned.

When those in high positions exalt the name of the worthy, the people will boast of being different and compete for reputation. When worthy names are not exalted, the people will not compete for them. When those in high positions prize rare and precious goods, the people will vie for profit, even becoming thieves. When such goods are not prized, the people will not steal for them. When those in high positions display things that stir up desire, everyone will want to possess them, and their thoughts will grow unsettled. When these things are not displayed, the people’s minds will not be disturbed.

This is, in general, how people are. Therefore, when the sage governs the world, they seek to quiet the pursuit of ornate and flashy things and to provide fully for the plain necessities of daily life. This is what is meant by “emptying the heart and filling the belly.” They seek to block the beginnings of rivalry and competition, and to support the foundations of steady self-reliance. This is what is meant by “weakening the will and strengthening the bones.” The people are regularly kept free of clever distinctions, and craving is not allowed to arise. Those who presume on their cleverness and play with schemes are also kept from using private cunning and petty methods to disrupt governance. The sage simply follows the people’s nature and does not impose action recklessly. In this way, nothing in the world will be left ungoverned.

Here, “heart,” “belly,” “will,” and “bones” are all metaphors: the heart refers to a mind unsettled by distractions; the belly, to basic needs; the will, to the desire to compete and prevail; and the bones, to the foundations of the body and livelihood.

The Dao is like an empty vessel; in use, it seems never to fill. It is deep and inexhaustible, as though it were the source of all things. It blunts its sharpness and untangles disorder; it softens its radiance and blends with the dusty world. It is profound and subtle, seeming to exist yet difficult to grasp. I do not know where it comes from; its manifest form seems older even than the sovereign of Heaven.

道冲然至无耳而用以适众有无所不遍或未有能盈其量者渊乎其似万物之宗主也体道者惟当挫已之锐而不争解物之纷而无扰冲然至无耳而用以适众有无所不遍或未有能盈其量者渊乎其似万物之宗主也体道者惟当挫已之锐而不争解物之纷而无扰和已之光而不耀同物之尘而不绝湛然无存而似或存焉体道如此道终不可得而名也吾不知谁在其先而此为之子也彷佛尚在帝之先耳 邵弁云上二其字以己言下二其字以人言 言或言似言象皆不敢质言之也此常无观妙之事也 天地不仁以万物为刍狗圣人不仁以百姓为刍狗天地之间其犹槖钥乎虚而不屈动而愈出多言数穷不如守中
Interpretation

The Great Dao appears empty and without form, yet it can harmonize and contain all kinds of concrete things. It is everywhere, and nothing can fill it. Vast and deep, it seems to be the source of all things. Those who cultivate the Dao should draw in their sharpness and avoid contention; resolve the turmoil among things without stirring them up; rein in their own brilliance and avoid showing it off; and blend into the world without becoming separate from all things. The Dao is deep and hidden, seeming to leave no trace, yet also appearing to be everywhere. When cultivation reaches this state, the Dao still cannot be accurately named. I do not know from whom it came; I can only say that all things seem to be its descendants. It seems to have existed even before the Lord of Heaven appeared.

Shao Bian says that the first two instances of “its” refer to the cultivator, while the last two refer to other people and things outside oneself.

The original uses words such as “perhaps,” “seems,” and “appears” because it does not presume to define the Dao with certainty. This passage describes contemplating the Dao’s subtle aspect through the idea of “constant nonbeing.”

Heaven and Earth show no partiality, treating the myriad things like straw dogs used in ritual offerings. The sages, too, show no partiality, treating the people like straw dogs. This does not mean that Heaven and Earth or the sages harbor ill will; it means that they do not favor or interfere with the myriad things and the people.

Isn’t the space between Heaven and Earth like a bellows? Though empty inside, it is never exhausted; once it moves, breath pours forth without ceasing. Too many words can lead one to an early end. Better to hold fast to inner emptiness, stillness, and balance.

天地未尝有私恩于物但听万物之自生自死其视万物若人所用以祭之刍狗然饰之而进非爱之既事而弃非恶之皆适然而已圣人之于百姓亦未尝用私恩也但因民性之自然而无以害之生杀予夺听其自取而我无心焉夫天地之间其犹治者之槖钥乎槖钥之为器虚其中而不屈一动而气愈出天地之生万物亦若是而已矣何杀予夺听其自取而我无心焉夫天地之间其犹治者之槖钥乎槖钥之为器虚其中而不屈一动而气愈出天地之生万物亦若是而已矣何所庸其私恩之有知天地则知圣人圣人之所以治民者亦自有其虚而不屈者在所谓中也守之可耳多言致穷何为乎 焦氏云屈郁也抑而不申之意 末二句未免强解似自为一义王纯甫以为老子虑后世误认刍狗之言而发此叹亦似有味 谷神不死是谓玄牝玄牝之门是谓天地根绵绵若存用之不勤 谷神不与物俱死是谓玄牝玄牝之门乃天地之所从而生是谓牝玄牝之门是谓天地根绵绵若存用之不勤
Interpretation

Heaven and Earth do not show partial favor to the myriad things. They simply let them grow naturally and perish naturally. Heaven and Earth regard the myriad things as people regard the straw dogs used in ritual: before the sacrifice, they are adorned and respectfully presented, not because they are cherished; once the sacrifice is over, they are discarded, not because they are despised. All of this simply follows what is natural.

The sage governs the people without bestowing partial favor. Instead, the sage follows their nature and does not hinder them. Whether bringing life or death, giving or taking, the sage lets things develop according to their own circumstances and harbors no private designs.

Isn’t the space between Heaven and Earth like a bellows used by a skilled craftsperson? Its middle is empty, yet it does not collapse; once it is worked, air pours out without end. Heaven and Earth bring forth the myriad things in just this way. What need is there to bestow any partial favor? To understand Heaven and Earth is to understand the sage. In governing the people, the sage maintains a state that is empty yet never exhausted—what is called the “middle.” It is enough to hold fast to this. Speaking too much only leads to distress; why do so?

Jiao Xi says that “exhausted” means congested and oppressed, unable to unfold.

The interpretations of the final two lines seem somewhat strained; perhaps they can be understood on another level. Wang Chunfu believes that Laozi feared later generations would misunderstand the passage about the straw dogs, and so voiced this lament. This interpretation seems to have some merit as well.

The “Spirit of the Valley” does not perish along with the myriad things. This is called the “Mysterious Female,” the deep maternal power that can give birth to all things. The gate of the Mysterious Female is the source from which Heaven and Earth come into being. It continues without end, seeming almost to exist and almost not to exist; when put to use, it is never exhausted.

The “Spirit of the Valley” does not perish along with the myriad things. This is called the “Mysterious Female.” The gate of the Mysterious Female is where Heaven and Earth come into being, and so it is called their source. It continues without end, seeming almost to exist and almost not to exist; when put to use, it is never exhausted.

谷神不与物俱死是谓玄牝玄牝之门乃天地之所从而生是谓天地之根学道者体乎此而已矣绵绵然若或存之非存而存也用之以应物而不勤无用之用也 焦氏曰谷喻也以其虚而能受受而不有微妙莫测故曰谷神牝生万物犹前章所谓母也谓之玄牝亦幽深不测之意 薛君采曰牝读如匕以叶上句玄牝之门特衍其辞与下句相叶 苏氏曰谓之谷神言其德也谓之玄牝言其功也牝生万物而谓之玄焉言其生之而不见其所以生也此申说首章之旨谷神不死即所谓常道也玄牝之门言其德也谓之玄牝言其功也牝生万物而谓之玄焉言其生之而不见其所以生也此申说首章之旨谷神不死即所谓常道也玄牝之门是谓天地根即无名天地之始也绵绵若存观妙之事用之不勤观徼之事 天长地久天地所以能长且久者以其不自生故能长生是以圣人后其身而身先外其身而身存非以其无私邪故能成其私 天长地久天地所以能长且久者以其生物而不自私其生故能长生使天地而自私其生则天地亦一物矣何以能长且久哉是以圣人处柔处下本以后其身也而身以先寡欲无求本以外其身也而身以存其后身外身非以其心之无私耶心无私故能成其私而身以先身以存焉亦理势之固然者耳
Interpretation

The Spirit of the Valley—the Dao, empty like a valley yet able to contain all things—does not perish along with them. This is called the “Mysterious Female,” the profound maternal power that gives life and nourishment to all things. The gate of the Mysterious Female is where Heaven and Earth come into being; it is the root of Heaven and Earth. Those who study the Dao need only understand and practice this. It stretches on without end, seeming almost to exist. It is no visible object, yet it truly has an effect. It can meet the needs of all things without effort. This is the use of what appears useless.

Jiao says: “Valley” is a metaphor. Because it is empty, it can contain; though it can contain, it does not claim anything as its own. It is subtle and unfathomable, hence the name “Spirit of the Valley.” The female gives life and nourishment to all things, just like the “Mother” mentioned in the previous chapter. Calling it the “Mysterious Female” likewise describes its profound and unfathomable nature.

Xue Juncai says: “Female” is pronounced bǐ to rhyme with the line above. “The gate of the Mysterious Female” is an added phrase that leads into the next line and also rhymes with it.

Su says: Calling it the “Spirit of the Valley” describes its De; calling it the “Mysterious Female” describes its function. The female gives life and nourishment to all things, yet is called “mysterious” because we cannot see how it does so. This further clarifies the meaning of the opening chapter: the Spirit of the Valley does not die—that is what is meant by the constant Dao. “The gate of the Mysterious Female is the root of Heaven and Earth” means the same as “the nameless is the beginning of Heaven and Earth.” “It stretches on, seeming almost to exist” describes perceiving what is subtle and hidden; “use it, and it is never exhausted” describes perceiving the signs through which the myriad things appear.

Heaven and Earth endure for a long time. They can endure because they do not live only for themselves. Therefore, the sage puts himself last and comes to the fore; treats himself as though he were outside the matter and thereby preserves himself. Is this not because he has no selfish intent? That is why he can fulfill himself.

Heaven and Earth endure for a long time. They can endure because they give life and nourishment to all things without treating that work as their private gain. If Heaven and Earth cared only about their own survival, they too would become just one thing among the myriad things. How, then, could they endure? So the sage is gentle and humble: he puts himself last and comes to the fore. He has few desires and seeks nothing for himself: he treats himself as though he were outside the matter and thereby preserves himself. It is precisely because he has no selfish thoughts that “putting himself last” and “treating himself as though he were outside the matter” allow him to come to the fore and preserve himself. In having no selfish intent, he fulfills himself; his ability to come to the fore and preserve himself follows naturally from how things work.

上善若水水善利万物而不争处众人之所恶故几于道居善地心善渊与善仁言善信政善治事善能动善时夫唯不争故无尤 人之上善有似乎水水之为性善于利万物而不争人皆好上已独就下而处众人之所恶故近于道人之上善者居则善时夫唯不争故无尤 人之上善有似乎水水之为性善于利万物而不争人皆好上已独就下而处众人之所恶故近于道人之上善者居则善地无处而不安一水之流行坎止也心则善渊静深而莫测一水之空洞静默也与则善仁而利泽及物一水之滋益群生也言则善信而不弃一水之行险不失也政则善治而得理水之涤秽通美平准高下也事则善能而多方水之溃坚入微无往不达也动则善时而能变水之避高就下流动不滞也兼此众善而又能不争夫唯不争故入世而无尤此上善之所以若水也 持而盈之不如其已揣而锐之不可长保金玉满堂莫之能守富贵而骄自遗其咎功成名遂身退天之道
Interpretation

The highest goodness is like water. Water skillfully nourishes all things without contending with them. It settles in the low places that everyone else dislikes, and so comes closest to the Dao (the Way). A person of the highest goodness should choose a suitable place to live, keep a deep and tranquil heart, treat others with kindness, speak truthfully, bring order to affairs, make full use of their abilities, and act at the right time. Because they do not contend, they incur no fault.

The highest goodness in a person is like water. Water’s nature is to nourish all things without contending. Everyone likes to be in high places, but water alone is willing to flow downward and remain in the low places that others dislike. That is why it is close to the Dao. A person of the highest goodness can adapt their dwelling to their surroundings; like water, they are at ease whether moving or still. Their heart is quiet and deep like a pool, difficult for others to fathom; water, too, is clear and still. They treat others with kindness and benefit all around them, just as water nourishes living things. They speak truthfully and do not break their word, just as water flows through dangerous places without straying from its course. They bring order to affairs, as water washes away filth, brings clear waters together, and levels high and low places. They are capable and resourceful in their work, as water can break through what is hard and seep into the smallest spaces, reaching everywhere it goes. They act in keeping with the moment and adapt with flexibility, as water avoids high places and flows downward, moving without obstruction. They embody all these forms of goodness and still do not contend; therefore, they make no mistakes in the way they conduct themselves. This is why the highest goodness is like water.

To hold on tightly until something is full is not as good as stopping at the right time. Sharpen an object too much, and its edge will not last. No one can guard a hall filled with gold and jade forever. Pride after gaining wealth and status only invites misfortune. Once your work is accomplished and your name has become prominent, step aside in good time. This accords with the Way of Heaven.

人有所固持而盈之不如不盈之为安也有所揣量而锐之不知锐之不可恃也金玉满堂莫之能守盈何为乎富贵而骄自遗其咎锐何为乎亦法天之道而已功成名遂身退天之道也有而不有无所谓盈矣循理而动无所谓锐矣 诸本多解不可恃也金玉满堂莫之能守盈何为乎富贵而骄自遗其咎锐何为乎亦法天之道而已功成名遂身退天之道也有而不有无所谓盈矣循理而动无所谓锐矣 诸本多解作持其盈揣其锐 载营魄抱一能无离乎专气致柔能婴儿乎涤除玄览能无疵乎爱民治国能无为乎天门开阖能无雌乎明白四达能无知乎生之畜之生而不有为而不恃长而不宰是谓玄德
Interpretation

If a person insists on taking things to the point of excess, it is better to leave room to spare; this is what brings stability. If they keep calculating and honing their edge, they fail to see that an edge cannot be relied upon. No one is sure to keep a hall filled with gold and jade. Pride and self-satisfaction after attaining wealth and status can only bring trouble upon oneself. Why pursue excess and sharpness? It is enough to follow the Dao: once one’s work is accomplished and one’s name established, one withdraws. This is the way of Heaven. To possess without claiming ownership is to avoid excess; to act in accordance with the natural order is to avoid displaying one’s edge.

Different versions interpret the passage “One cannot rely on it; no one can keep a hall filled with gold and jade … act in accordance with the natural order, and there is no question of sharpness” in different ways. Some versions give the relevant wording as “hold on to fullness and hone one’s edge.”

Can you bring spirit and form into harmony, and keep them united without separation? Can you focus on cultivating Jing and Qi, becoming as gentle as an infant? Can you cleanse the mind and observe what is subtle, leaving no flaw within? Can you care for the people and govern the state with a heart of Wuwei (non-action)? Can you respond to the opening and closing changes between Heaven and Earth with the yielding gentleness of the female, without competing for strength or victory? Can you see clearly in all directions without assuming that you know everything?

Let all things grow and nurture them without claiming them as your own; act without relying on your accomplishments; guide the growth of all things without ruling over them. This is called “Mysterious De” (profound and natural Virtue/Power).

心役于物则营与魄离人之载营于魄而抱一者能常相守而不离乎心使气则气乱人之专守其气以致柔能如婴儿之纯乎私累不尽则神有所蔽人之涤除尘垢玄通旷览者能无疵乎身既治而治人爱民治国能清静坐理而无为乎天门开阖以应事变能为雌而不为雄乎既于事理明白四达能晦默若无知乎能如此则于天下之民生之畜之生之而治人爱民治国能清静坐理而无为乎天门开阖以应事变能为雌而不为雄乎既于事理明白四达能晦默若无知乎能如此则于天下之民生之畜之生之而不自以为有为之而不恃其劳长之而不任己意以宰制之是为深远难名之德 朱子曰魂阳动而魄阴静魂火二而魄水一故曰载营魄抱一能无离乎言以魂加魄以动守静以火迫水以二守一而不相离如人登车而载于其上则魂安静而魄精明火不燥而水不溢固长生久视之要诀也 玄览即观妙观徼之观天门指心开阖心之运动变化也 三十辐共一毂当其无有车之用埏埴以为器当其无有器之用凿户牖以为室当其无有室之用故有之以为利无之以为用
Interpretation

When the heart is constrained by external things, the spirit is disturbed. The human body carries the hun and po. If the hun is settled upon the po, and one holds steadfastly to “Embracing the One”—bringing body and mind into unity—can they remain together for a long time without separating? If Qi is used recklessly, it becomes disordered. By concentrating on guarding one’s own Qi and bringing it to a supple state, can one be as pure and simple as an infant? If selfish desires and worldly burdens have not been fully cast off, the spirit will be obscured. By washing away the mind’s dust and opening one’s awareness to what is subtle and profound, can one become free of blemish?

Once one has cultivated oneself, can one go on to govern others, care for the people, and rule the state while remaining still and governing in accord with nature, without acting forcefully? When faced with external changes, can the mind respond to things as the Heavenly Gate opens and closes, remaining yielding and free of contention, without striving to dominate? Having understood affairs and become perceptive in every direction, can one still remain quiet and reserved, as though knowing nothing? If one can do this, one can nourish the people of the world: letting them grow and caring for them without claiming them as one’s own; acting without relying on one’s achievements; and allowing the myriad things to flourish without imposing one’s will upon them. This is profound De, beyond words.

Zhu Xi says: The hun belongs to Yang and is active; the po belongs to Yin and is still. The hun belongs to Fire, and the po to Water. “Carrying the hun and po, embracing the One” means having the hun depend on the po, using stillness to govern movement and Fire to control Water, so that the two do not separate. It is like a person riding in a carriage, seated securely within it: the hun becomes settled, the po clear, Fire does not grow scorching, and Water does not overflow. This is an important method for long life and lasting vision.

“Dark Mirror” means seeing what is subtle and observing what is manifest. “Heavenly Gate” refers to the mind, while “opening and closing” refers to the mind’s activity and changes.

Thirty spokes converge at a single hub, but it is the hollow space within the hub that makes the wheel useful. Clay is kneaded into a vessel, but it is the hollow space inside that allows it to hold things. Doors and windows are cut to make a house, but it is the empty space within that makes it fit to live in and use. Thus, visible “being” provides convenience, while empty “nonbeing” makes things truly useful.

At the end, the text returns to the hub, the vessel, and the house: the hollow in the hub, the interior of the vessel, and the open space inside the house are precisely what enable them to serve their purpose. Form gives things convenience; emptiness makes them truly usable.

三十辐共一毂当无毂之处当其无有器之用凿户牖以为室当其无有室之用故有之以为利无之以为用 三十辐共一毂当无毂之处乃有车之用埏埴以为器当无器之处乃有器之用凿户牖以为室当无室之处乃有室之用有资于无如此故天下之理皆有之以为利无之以为用非有则无利而用之质亡矣非无则无用而利之机滞矣无非有不可也有非无亦不可也 五色令人目盲五音令人耳聋五味令人口爽驰骋畋猎令人心发狂难得之货令人行妨是以圣人为腹不为目故去彼取此 目以视色五色眩目而目为之盲耳以察音五音沸耳而耳为之聋口以尝味五味饫口而口为之爽田猎以自娱驰骋不已而心为之发狂货以利用好其难得而行为之妨岂非贪为之患哉逐乎外而无厌者目也止于内而易足者腹也是以圣人为腹之易足不为目之无厌故去彼外逐而取此内止也 宠辱若惊贵大患若身何谓宠辱若惊宠为下得易足者腹也是以圣人为腹之易足不为目之无厌故去彼外逐而取此内止也 宠辱若惊贵大患若身何谓宠辱若惊宠为下得也若惊失之若惊是谓宠辱若惊何谓贵大患若身吾所以有大患者为吾有身及吾无身吾有何患故贵以身为天下者可以寄天下爱以身为天下者可以托天下
Interpretation

Thirty spokes converge at the hub of a wheel. It is precisely because the hub is empty at its center that the wheel can function. Clay is kneaded and shaped into a vessel; it is precisely because the vessel is hollow inside that it can hold things. Doorways and windows are cut to make a house; it is precisely because space is left inside that people can live there. This shows that tangible things become useful through the intangible space within them. The principle of all things under Heaven is this: tangible things provide convenience, while empty spaces allow them to serve their purpose. Without a definite form, convenience and use have no foundation; without empty space, a thing cannot fulfill its purpose or provide convenience. Emptiness and substance are both indispensable.

Bright colors dazzle the eyes, complicated music dulls the hearing, and strong flavors impair the sense of taste. Galloping horses while hunting and becoming absorbed in the chase can drive the mind into frenzy. Rare and precious goods can obstruct people’s conduct. Therefore, the sage values sustaining inner contentment and does not pursue sensory pleasures. The sage lets go of outward enticements and chooses inner calm.

The eyes are for seeing colors, but when the five colors are too dazzling, they confuse the eyes. The ears are for hearing sounds, but when the five tones—gong, shang, jue, zhi, and yu—are too complicated, they tire the ears. The mouth is for tasting, but when the five flavors—sour, bitter, sweet, pungent, and salty—are too strong, they impair the sense of taste. Hunting is meant to provide enjoyment, but if one gallops about without pause, the mind can become frantic. Possessions can be put to use, but greed for hard-to-obtain things obstructs one’s conduct. Is this not the harm caused by greed? The senses pursue outward things and are never satisfied; inner contentment is easy to attain, like a belly that needs only enough to meet its basic needs. Therefore, the sage attends to the inner needs that are easy to satisfy and does not pursue the endless desires of the senses. The sage lets go of outward striving and chooses inner contentment.

Receiving favor or suffering disgrace is like being startled. Why are both favor and disgrace said to cause alarm? Because favor places one in a low position: receiving favor is like being startled, and losing favor is also like being startled. This is what is meant by “favor and disgrace are equally alarming.”

Why should we regard great calamities as we regard our own selves? The reason I suffer great calamity is that I have this body. If I had no body, what calamity could befall me? Therefore, only one who cherishes the world as they cherish their own person can be entrusted with the world; only one who cares for the world as they care for their own person can be given charge of its governance.

古之达人宠辱皆若惊视宠犹辱也重大患如身同身于患也何谓宠辱若惊人莫不以宠为上而辱为下若知辱生于宠宠为辱先则宠固为下矣故得之若惊讶辱之将至也失之亦若惊幸辱之可免也何谓重大患若身吾所以有大患者为吾之自有其身耳自有其身则爱身之情过笃而人世得失之事皆足为难矣吾能后其身外其身是不有其身也不有其身则死生荣辱可以以有大患者为吾之自有其身耳自有其身则爱身之情过笃而人世得失之事皆足为难矣吾能后其身外其身是不有其身也不有其身则死生荣辱可以一致复有何患乎进而推之人之不有其身者必不以得天下为荣而贵以身为天下矣斯人也真可寄以天下者也人之不有其身者必能不自生而生人而爱以身为天下矣斯人也真可托以天下者也贵重也难也 视之不见名曰夷听之不闻名曰希抟之不得名曰微此三者不可致诘故混而为一其上不皦其下不昧绳绳兮不可名复归于无物是谓无状之状无物之象是谓惚恍迎之不见其首随之不见其后执古之道以御今之有能知古始是谓道纪
Interpretation

The ancients who understood the Great Dao regarded favor and disgrace alike as alarming, because they knew that receiving favor was itself like suffering disgrace. They treated great calamity as though it concerned their own person because they held their own person in great regard.

Why are favor and disgrace both alarming? People usually see receiving favor as good and suffering disgrace as bad. But if we understand that disgrace often follows from favor, and that favor is a sign of disgrace to come, then favor itself is not worth making much of. When receiving favor, be as cautious as if disgrace were about to arrive. When losing favor, regard it as one might welcome the chance to avoid disgrace at last.

Why treat great calamity as though it concerned one’s own person? I suffer great calamity because I have this body. Because I have a body, I care for myself too deeply, and so all the gains and losses of the world can trouble me. If I could put myself last and stand apart—that is, if I did not cling to myself—then life and death, honor and disgrace, could be seen as one. What cause for worry would remain?

To take this further, a person who does not cling to the self does not regard gaining the world as an honor, but cherishes their own life and takes responsibility for the world. Only such a person can truly be entrusted with the world. A person who does not cling to the self does not simply look after their own survival, but cherishes life so that all people may live. Only such a person can truly be given charge of the world. “Esteem” means to cherish; “calamity” means something to fear.

Look for it, but it cannot be seen: this is called “Yi.” Listen for it, but it cannot be heard: this is called “Xi.” Try to grasp it, but it cannot be caught: this is called “Wei.” These three cannot be traced to their ultimate source, so they merge into one. Above, it is not bright; below, it is not dark. It continues without end and cannot be named, then returns to what has no form or substance. This is called “the form of the formless, the image of the insubstantial,” and also “Huhuang”—seeming to exist and not to exist, elusive and hard to grasp. Meet it head-on, and you cannot see its beginning; follow it, and you cannot see its end. Grasp the Dao that has existed since ancient times and use it to guide things in the present. To know the source of all things is called the “guiding principle of the Dao,” the Dao’s fundamental order.

Look for it, but it cannot be seen; this is why it is called “Yi.” Listen for it, but it cannot be heard; this is why it is called “Xi.” Try to grasp it, but it cannot be caught, and so it appears to exist and not to exist; this is called “Huhuang.” Meet it head-on, and you cannot see its beginning; follow it, and you cannot see its end. Grasp the Dao that has existed since ancient times and use it to guide things in the present. To know the source of all things is called the “guiding principle of the Dao.”

视之而不见因名曰夷听之而不闻因名曰希抟之而不得因之象是谓惚恍迎之不见其首随之不见其后执古之道以御今之有能知古始是谓道纪 视之而不见因名曰夷听之而不闻因名曰希抟之而不得因名曰微此三名皆强名也实则不可致诘故混而为一凡物之有形者皆有明昧此则上不皦而下不昧无形之可求也绳绳兮往过来续于日用之间若有物可名而实不可名复归于无物而已是谓无状之状无物之象是谓惚而可执以为有恍而不可执以为无迎而求之莫知其所自来也随而究之莫知其所自终也自古有之谓之曰道人有执古之道以御今而已是谓无状之状无物之象是谓惚而可执以为有恍而不可执以为无迎而求之莫知其所自来也随而究之莫知其所自终也自古有之谓之曰道人有执古之道以御今日所有之事物者身在今日而能知古初无物之始矣是谓道之统绪约略也通章皆极赞道体之妙 古之善为士者微妙玄通深不可识夫唯不可识故强为之容豫若冬渉川犹若畏四邻俨若客涣若冰将释敦兮其若朴旷兮其若谷混兮其若浊孰能浊以静之徐清孰能安以久动之徐生保此道者不欲盈夫唯不盈故能敝不新成
Interpretation

You look at it but cannot see it, so it is called “yi.” You listen for it but cannot hear it, so it is called “xi.” You try to grasp it but cannot catch it, so it is called “wei.” These three names are only makeshift ways of speaking about it; in truth, it cannot be pursued or explained clearly. Thus, the Dao blends into a unity. Everything with a shape has distinguishable light and darkness; the Dao, however, appears neither bright nor dim, and cannot be sought by means of its shape.

The Dao flows on without end, passing back and forth through everyday life, one moment following another. It seems as though there were something that could be named, yet no name can identify it precisely; in the end, it returns to formlessness and nothingness. This is called “the shape of what has no shape, the image of what is no thing.” It is elusive and hard to discern, yet can be said to exist; it seems both present and absent, and cannot be grasped as a solid thing. Pursue it from the front, and you do not know where it came from; follow it and investigate, and you do not know where it ends. Since ancient times, this Dao has existed, and it is called the Dao. Those who attain the Dao can grasp the Dao that has existed since antiquity and use it to govern things in the present. Living today, they can understand the state of all things before they first took form. This, in broad outline, is the lineage through which the Dao has been transmitted. The whole chapter goes to great lengths to praise the Dao’s mysterious nature.

Those in ancient times who were skilled in cultivating the Dao were subtle and mysterious, penetrating the depths and impossible to fathom. Because they were so hard to discern, one can only describe them tentatively: cautious, like someone crossing a river in winter; alert, as if wary of being watched from every side; solemn, like a guest; yielding and dispersed, like ice about to melt; simple and unadorned, like uncarved wood; open and spacious, like a valley; murky, like muddy water.

Who can make muddy water settle and slowly clear? Who can remain still, hold steady for a long time, and then gradually stir and bring forth activity? Those who keep to the Dao do not seek fullness and completion. Precisely because they do not seek fullness, even when they decline, they do not rush to manufacture new achievements.

古之善为士者微矣妙矣玄矣通矣其深不可得而识也夫唯不可识故但强为之容豫兮若渉川之难之也犹兮若畏四邻之慎之也俨若客之无惰也涣若冰释之无所凝滞也敦兮其若朴之厚重也旷兮其若谷之虚受也浑兮其若浊之晦默也盛德之容盖如此其微妙玄通者终不可得而识也古之士何以致谷之虚受也浑兮其若浊之晦默也盛德之容盖如此其微妙玄通者终不可得而识也古之士何以致此哉亦惟浊以静之徐清安以动之徐生而已今之人皆昭昭以为清耳孰能浊以静之而徐自清皆争先以为生耳孰能安以久而不妄动动之而因应徐生者乎大抵保此道者不欲自盈盈则心不虚而道不可保矣夫唯不盈则能安其敝能不求新成则其所以静而徐清动而徐生微妙玄通之域可企而至也 能敝能不新成即浊也安以久也 极形盛德之妙而示人入德之方 致虚极守静笃万物并作吾以观其复夫物芸芸各归其根归根曰静静曰复命复命曰常知常曰明不知常妄作凶知常容容乃公公乃王王乃天天乃道道乃久没归其根归根曰静静曰复命复命曰常知常曰明不知常妄作凶知常容容乃公公乃王王乃天天乃道道乃久没身不殆
Interpretation

Those in ancient times who were skilled in cultivating the Dao were subtle, profound, and far-reaching, their state so deep that it was difficult to fathom. Since they could not truly be seen through, one can only attempt to describe them: hesitant and cautious, as if crossing a river in winter; alert and guarded, as if danger surrounded them; solemn and respectful, as if they were guests who dared not be careless; open and yielding, like ice melting away; simple and uncarved, like a block of wood untouched by tools; broad and empty, like a valley able to receive all things; and murky and reserved, like muddy water that gives nothing away.

People of great De (Virtue/Power) were much like this. They were subtle, profound, and far-reaching, and ultimately could not be fathomed. How did the cultivators of the Dao in ancient times attain this state? They simply let turbidity settle into clarity through stillness, and let life gradually grow through stability. Today, everyone is eager to appear clear-minded, but who can let turbidity grow still and wait for it to clear on its own? Everyone competes to act first, but who can remain steady and undisturbed over time, and, when acting, follow the way things are so that vitality can gradually emerge?

Generally speaking, those who hold to the Dao do not seek to be complete in themselves. When they consider themselves complete, their minds are no longer empty and still, and they can no longer hold to the Dao. Only by not considering oneself complete can one calmly accept the decline of things, without hastening to seek the new or force an outcome. In this way, one can grow still and gradually become clear; when acting, one can gradually bring forth growth, drawing closer to a subtle, profound, and unobstructed state. To accept decline without hastening to seek the new or force an outcome is to let turbidity settle and to remain still over time. Here, the subtle state of great De is described in full, and the path to cultivating virtue is also shown.

Attain the utmost emptiness and stillness, and firmly hold to tranquility; then all things grow together. From this I observe how they return to their source. The myriad things flourish, but in the end each returns to its root. Returning to the root is called tranquility; tranquility is returning to life’s nature. Returning to one’s nature is called the constant Dao. To know the constant Dao is to be wise. Not knowing it and acting recklessly brings misfortune.

Those who know the constant Dao can be all-embracing. Being all-embracing, they can be impartial; being impartial, they can serve as a model for all; serving as a model for all, they can accord with Heaven; in accord with Heaven, they can accord with the Dao. In accord with the Dao, their lives can endure, and they can remain free from danger to the end of their days.

致虚至于极守静至于笃万物并作于前吾不与之作而以观其复万物之作芸芸然矣我观复则不见其芸芸而与之各归其根夫物之芸芸者归其根则万物无足动我者是之谓静是之谓复命命者我生之本然也复其本然则无动也亦无静也谓之常而已知常者非微妙玄通之士不足以几之故曰明不知此常则未免妄作而致凶人知常则善恶两忘何所不容能容则徧覆无私何有不公公则可以为斯民之主而王王又不足以尽之而合乎始万物之天先天地之道人与道合体斯可以久而没身不殆矣极言虚静之效其入手在观复观复即首章观徼也 太上不知有之其次亲之誉之其次畏之其次侮之信不足有不信犹兮其贵言功成事遂百姓皆谓我自然【不知有之诸本并作下知有之】 太上盛治次畏之其次侮之信不足有不信犹兮其贵言功成事遂百姓皆谓我自然【不知有之诸本并作下知有之】 太上盛治之君下但知有之而已其次则民亲之誉之又其次则畏之又其次则侮之其递降而至致侮者何故惟上之信有不足故民有不信而至于侮也民既不信虽多言何益乎若太上之君则不然犹兮贵重其言而不轻出使民阴受其赐及功成事遂百姓皆以为我自如此不知谁之所为也所以下但知有之也 大道废有仁义智慧出有大伪六亲不和有孝慈国家昏乱有忠臣
Interpretation

Reduce the distracting thoughts in your heart to a minimum, and sustain a state of stillness and clarity until it is profound. As all things grow and change before me, I do not set them in motion; I simply observe how they return. The myriad things grow luxuriantly, in great profusion. When I observe their return, I am no longer stirred by the spectacle of their abundance; I see each of them returning to its root. When all things return to the root, nothing can disturb me. This is called “stillness,” and also “returning to one’s original life.” “Life” refers to the original state of my life. To return to that original state is to be beyond both movement and stillness. This is called “constancy.” One who understands constancy must have subtle and penetrating insight into the mysteries of the Dao; without it, this understanding is difficult to attain. That is why it is called wisdom. Those who do not understand constancy cannot help but act recklessly and bring danger upon themselves. Those who understand it can let go of distinctions between good and evil, and there is nothing they cannot accommodate. Able to accommodate all things, they are like Heaven, which covers everything without partiality. Free from partiality, they can become the people’s ruler and govern the world. Yet “king” still does not fully describe this state. In the end, it accords with the origin of all things: the Dao that existed before Heaven and Earth took shape. When a person and the Dao become one, that person can endure for a long time and remain free from danger throughout life.

This passage focuses on the state that can be attained through emptiness and stillness. The method begins with “observing return”: watching all things return to their root. This connects with “observing the manifestations” in chapter one of the Dao De Jing, which means observing the first signs by which things appear.

The best ruler is one whom the people merely know is there. The next best is one whom they love and praise; the next, one whom they fear; and the next, one whom they hold in contempt. When a ruler’s trustworthiness is insufficient, the people do not trust him. The best ruler acts with care and speaks sparingly, issuing commands only when necessary. When the work is done and the achievements complete, the people all believe that things happened of themselves.

“Supreme” refers to the most accomplished ruler. When the best ruler governs well, the people merely know that he exists. The next best is one whom the people love and praise; the next, one whom they fear; and the next, one whom they hold in contempt. When a ruler lacks trustworthiness, the people do not trust him and may even hold him in contempt. If the people do not trust him, what use is it for him to say more? The best ruler does not act this way. Careful and sparing with words, he does not speak lightly, and the people benefit without realizing it. When the work is done, they all believe that things simply turned out as they should, not knowing who brought it about. They merely know that such a ruler exists.

Only after the Great Dao declined did benevolence and righteousness appear. When cleverness and skill became conspicuous, deceit arose alongside them. Only when family members ceased to live in harmony did people make a special point of filial devotion and parental care. Only when political order in the state fell into chaos did so-called loyal ministers appear.

大道之行也民不知有仁义大道废而后仁义见矣民本相忘于朴智慧者出而自矜其明则民各以智相尚有大伪六亲不和有孝慈国家昏乱有忠臣 大道之行也民不知有仁义大道废而后仁义见矣民本相忘于朴智慧者出而自矜其明则民各以智相尚而大伪从此起矣六亲方和孝慈不着人尽孝且慈也不和而后有孝慈矣国家方治忠臣不见臣尽忠也国家昏乱而后有忠臣矣 绝圣弃智民利百倍绝仁弃义民复孝慈绝巧弃利盗贼无有此三者以为文不足故令有所属见素抱朴少私寡欲 以圣智相尚则民各奋其智能而苦于多事绝圣弃智民利百倍矣以仁义为美则人骛于名而孝慈之实衰绝仁弃义民复孝慈矣以巧相御以利相夸则民多贪诈而至于为盗绝巧弃利盗贼无有矣此三者圣人以为皆文也皆不足者也故令绝之弃之而他有所属惟见其质抱其朴少所私寡诈而至于为盗绝巧弃利盗贼无有矣此三者圣人以为皆文也皆不足者也故令绝之弃之而他有所属惟见其质抱其朴少所私寡所欲以庶几于无为之治焉 此章与前章紧相应
Interpretation

When the Great Dao—the fundamental principle of natural Wuwei (non-action)—was followed, people did not know what benevolence and righteousness were. They appeared only after the Great Dao declined. People were originally simple and unspoiled, living in harmony without needing to make a point of benevolence and righteousness. Later, cleverness and talent came to be prized. People began to consider themselves wise and compete with one another in displays of intelligence, and hypocrisy arose as a result. Families had once lived in harmony, with everyone showing filial devotion and care without making a special show of them. Filial devotion and care were only spoken of once families fell into discord. The state had once been peaceful and well governed, with officials faithfully carrying out their duties, so there was no need to praise loyal ministers. Loyal ministers stood out only when the state fell into disorder.

Thus, set aside the habit of boasting of sagely wisdom, and the people will benefit a hundredfold. Set aside the practice of praising one another in the name of benevolence and righteousness, and the people will recover their filial devotion and care. Set aside the display of clever skills and the pursuit of profit, and thieves will disappear. The sage considers these three demands mere outward ornament, inadequate for governing the world. People should therefore abandon them and turn instead toward what they can rely on: reveal their unadorned nature, remain simple, reduce selfishness and desire, and draw near to government through Wuwei.

When people compete in displays of sagely wisdom, each strives to show off their abilities and ends up entangled in complicated affairs. Set aside this competition, and the people will benefit a hundredfold. When benevolence and righteousness are treated as fine reputations to acquire, people chase after fame, while the genuine feeling behind filial devotion and care declines. Stop boasting of benevolence and righteousness, and their original sincerity can be restored. When people use deceitful cleverness against one another and flaunt their pursuit of profit, they become greedy and dishonest, even turning to theft. Abandon the display of clever skills and the pursuit of profit, and thieves will have no reason to arise.

The sage sees these three tendencies as mere outward adornment that cannot address the root of the problem. People should abandon them and return to what is genuine: reveal what is simple, preserve simplicity, and reduce selfishness and desire, thereby drawing near to government through Wuwei. This chapter is closely connected to the one before it.

绝学无忧唯之与阿相去几何善之与恶相去何若人之所畏不可不畏荒兮其未央哉众人熙熙如享太牢如春登台我独怕兮其未兆如婴儿之未孩乘乘兮若无所归众人皆有余而我独若遗我愚人之心也哉沌沌兮俗人昭昭我独若昏俗人察察我独闷闷忽兮若晦寂兮似无所止众人皆有以我独顽似鄙我独异于人而贵食母【焦氏云怕古泊字静也】 人绝去世俗名象之学则无分别计较之忧如唯阿善恶世学之所务别也自我观之唯之与阿相去几何乎善之与恶相去何若乎亦固任之已耳可无用学可无用忧也若夫人之所畏我亦不可不畏不敢有所忽遗也然循理谨度而外无容心焉此心之广大荒哉其未之有涯际矣若乎亦固任之已耳可无用学可无用忧也若夫人之所畏我亦不可不畏不敢有所忽遗也然循理谨度而外无容心焉此心之广大荒哉其未之有涯际矣人之所乐我未尝溺以为乐众人方熙熙然如享太牢如春登台我独怕兮其无情欲之兆如婴儿之未孩矣畏与乐皆不足累但觉其心乘乘兮若无所归不系于私也众人皆有余而我独若遗不滞于有也我其愚人之心也哉沌沌兮俗人昭昭其有知也而我独若昏俗人察察其务别也而我独闷闷且又忽兮似晦寂兮似无所止众人皆有所为我独顽然似鄙其无忧之状如此何以能然哉众人方骛于学我独绝之返乎无物之始而以自养也
Interpretation

If you stop chasing worldly labels and knowledge, you will not be troubled by distinctions and calculations. How much difference, in the end, is there between the polite replies and deference that people value, or between their judgments of good and evil? Let things follow their natural course; there is no need to study these matters deliberately or worry over them. As for what people fear and revere, I cannot help but treat it with respect and dare not neglect it. But so long as I follow what is right and act with care, I hold on to nothing else in my heart. This state of mind is vast and boundless, with no end.

I have never been absorbed in the things people love. While everyone rejoices, as if feasting at a lavish sacrificial banquet or climbing a terrace to admire the springtime view, I remain calm and unmoved, like an infant who has not yet shown desire. Neither fear nor joy can burden me. I feel only that my spirit drifts, as if with nowhere to return and no private thoughts to bind it.

Everyone feels they have gained something, while I seem to have lost something and never settle into possession. My heart truly seems like the heart of a fool, muddled and confused. The people of the world appear clear-sighted and perceptive, while I seem dim; they are sharp and discerning, while I remain quiet and generous. I drift as if surrounded by darkness and am so still that I seem to have no fixed home. Everyone has something to do, while I seem slow and unrefined.

I differ from everyone else because I value and follow the “Mother”—the root of all things, that is, the Dao—and nourish myself through it. While others busy themselves pursuing knowledge, I cast aside distinctions and calculations and return to the original state before the birth of all things, cultivating myself in this way.

Here, “great sacrificial offering” refers to the lavish ancient ritual offering of an ox, a sheep, and a pig. According to Jiao’s explanation, “po” in its ancient sense is interchangeable with “bo,” meaning calm and still.

孔德之容惟道是从道之为物惟恍惟惚惚兮恍兮其中有象恍兮惚兮其中有物窈兮冥兮其中有精其精甚真其中有信自古及今其名不去以阅众甫吾何以知众甫之然哉以此 盛德者之容貌以为道是从耳道体之妙何如乎道之为物惟恍惟惚不可得而见不去以阅众甫吾何以知众甫之然哉以此 盛德者之容貌以为道是从耳道体之妙何如乎道之为物惟恍惟惚不可得而见也虽不可见然惚恍之中有象恍惚之中有物窈冥之中有精其精甚真而不妄其中有信而可据也是道也自古及今其名不去以阅众甫吾何以知众甫为道所阅哉正以道体恍惚窈冥无可变灭故众甫与化俱往而道自常存耳 王纯甫云阅历也众甫天地万物凡自道而出者皆是也王辅嗣云阅自门出者一一而数之言道如门万物皆自此往也 曲则全枉则直洼则盈敝则新少则得多则惑是以圣人抱一为天下式不自见故明不自是故彰不自伐故有功不自矜故长夫唯不争故天下莫能与如门万物皆自此往也 曲则全枉则直洼则盈敝则新少则得多则惑是以圣人抱一为天下式不自见故明不自是故彰不自伐故有功不自矜故长夫唯不争故天下莫能与之争古之所谓曲则全者岂虚言哉诚全而归之
Interpretation

Those with great De (Virtue) conduct themselves and carry themselves in ways that accord with the Dao (the Way). The Dao’s form is always indistinct and elusive, difficult to discern. Yet within the indistinct there are images; between seeming existence and nonexistence there are real things; and in the depths of shadow there is a subtle essence. This essence is genuine and not false, and within it there is also evidence that can be trusted. From ancient times to the present, the name of the Dao has endured, allowing people to observe the origins of all things. How do I know that the origins of all things are as I have described? By relying on this principle.

A commentator explains that the appearance and conduct of a person with great De accord with the Dao. What, exactly, is the Dao’s essence? Though the Dao is indistinct and hard to see, it contains images and real things. Within its depths, difficult to fathom, lies a subtle and genuine essence, along with what is credible and can serve as evidence. The Dao has existed from ancient times to the present, so it can be used to observe the origins of all things. The commentator Wang Chunfu says that “observe” means to experience and examine, while “the myriad beginnings” refers to Heaven, Earth, and all things—in other words, everything born from the Dao. Wang Fusi, in turn, compares the Dao to a gateway: all things pass in and out through it, and so can be observed one by one.

Yield, and you will be preserved; bend, and you will be straightened; sink low, and you will be filled; wear out, and you will be renewed. Take little, and you will gain; grasp at much, and you will be bewildered. Therefore, the sage holds fast to the One of the Dao, its fundamental principle, and makes it the standard for all under Heaven. By not putting himself on display, he becomes clear-sighted; by not asserting himself, he becomes distinguished; by not boasting of his achievements, he achieves merit; by not exalting himself, he endures. Because he does not contend with others, no one under Heaven can contend with him.

Could the ancients’ saying, “Yield, and you will be preserved,” really be empty words? Indeed, when a person follows the way of things, in the end they can preserve themselves and become whole.

凡物之理曲者则可全枉者则可直洼者则可盈敝者则可新少者则可得多者则可惑此盈虚消息之一定者也是以圣人但抱一而不求多焉而已为天下式矣不自表见其明故明不自是以求彰故彰不自伐其功故有功不自矜其长故长此皆不争之道也夫唯不争故天下莫能与之争如谓犹有与之争也古之所谓曲则全者岂虚言哉夫人亦患不能曲耳苟曲矣诚全而归之物理断不可诬也 希言自然飘风不终朝骤雨不终日孰为此者天地天地尚不能久而况于人乎故从事于曲耳苟曲矣诚全而归之物理断不可诬也 希言自然飘风不终朝骤雨不终日孰为此者天地天地尚不能久而况于人乎故从事于道者道者同于道德者同于德失者同于失同于道者道亦乐得之同于德者德亦乐得之同于失者失亦乐得之信不足有不信
Interpretation

Everything has its own natural principle: what is bent can be preserved; what is pressed down can rise; what is low can be filled; what is old can be renewed. Taking little can bring gain, while taking too much can lead to confusion. This is the inevitable way that fullness and emptiness, decline and growth, follow one another.

Therefore, the sage holds fast to the Dao (the fundamental principle by which all things move) and does not relentlessly seek more; thus, he becomes a model for all under heaven. He does not display himself, and so he is made clear; he does not assert his own correctness, and so he is recognized; he does not boast of his achievements, and so his accomplishments endure; he does not rely on his strengths, and so they are preserved. These are the principles of non-contention. Because he does not contend, no one under heaven can contend with him. Even if someone still wished to contend with him, could the ancient saying “what is bent can be preserved” really be empty words? People worry only that they cannot bend in order to remain whole. If they can bend, they can indeed be preserved in the end and find a place to return to. This is truly the way things are, and it cannot be denied.

Few words accord with nature. A gale cannot blow for a whole morning; a downpour cannot last an entire day. Who makes them so? Heaven and Earth. If even the fierce winds and rains brought forth by Heaven and Earth cannot last, how much less can a person’s efforts endure? Therefore, in acting, one must know how to bend in order to remain whole. If one can bend, one can indeed be preserved in the end and find a place to return to. This is truly the way things are, and it cannot be denied.

Few words accord with nature. A gale cannot blow for a whole morning; a downpour cannot last an entire day. Who makes them so? Heaven and Earth. If even the fierce winds and rains brought forth by Heaven and Earth cannot last, how much less can a person’s efforts endure? Therefore, those who act in accordance with the Dao are in harmony with the Dao; those who cultivate De (Virtue/Power) are in harmony with De; those who lose the Dao and De are likewise in accord with what they have lost. Those in harmony with the Dao are gladly received by the Dao; those in harmony with De are gladly received by De; those in harmony with loss are gladly received by loss. When trustworthiness is insufficient, naturally there will be those who do not trust you.

人希简其言因任自然而无容心则可矣飘风不终朝骤雨不终日此孰之为乎天地也天地尚不能以飘骤者久而人乃欲以一已之辨智与异己者争不亦难乎故从事于道者不然与道者遇即相忘于道与德者遇即相忘于德与失者遇亦相忘于失唯希言而已自然而已同于道者道者亦乐得之同于德故从事于道者不然与道者遇即相忘于道与德者遇即相忘于德与失者遇亦相忘于失唯希言而已自然而已同于道者道者亦乐得之同于德者德者亦乐得之同于失者失者亦乐得之人无贤愚皆与相安信之故也使其信有不足焉则虽多言以争之而犹不信也甚矣希言自然之足贵也 跂者不立跨者不行自见者不明自是者不彰自伐者无功自矜者不长其在道曰余食赘行物或恶之故有道者不处 跂者欲加高于立而适不立跨者欲加速于行而适不行世之自见以求明自是以求彰自伐其功自矜其长何以异此乎其于道也如食之余如行之赘物或恶之矣故有道者不处也赘行之行焦氏云当作形古字通也
Interpretation

People should speak little, follow nature, and act without selfish motives. That is all. A gale does not last through the morning, and a downpour does not last all day. What brings them about? Heaven and Earth. If even Heaven and Earth cannot make gales and downpours last, how difficult must it be for people to rely on eloquence and cleverness to argue with those who disagree?

Those who cultivate the Dao are not like this. When they meet someone who understands the Dao, they do not insist on talking about the Dao. When they meet someone who values De, they do not insist on talking about De. When they meet someone who has lost the way, they do not insist on talking about that, either. They simply speak little and follow nature. Those in accord with the Dao are gladly received by the Dao; those in accord with De are gladly received by De; those in accord with being lost are received by what they are lost in. Whether wise or foolish, people can live together in peace because they trust one another. If trust is lacking, even a great deal of argument will not persuade the other person. This shows how precious it is to speak little and follow nature.

Those who rise onto their toes cannot stand steady; those who take oversized strides cannot go far. Those who show themselves off cannot truly make themselves known; those who think themselves right cannot bring themselves recognition. Those who boast of their achievements have no achievements to speak of; those who glorify themselves cannot endure. Measured against the Dao, these are like leftover food and excess growths on the body, things everyone detests. Therefore, those who have the Dao do not act this way.

Rising onto one’s toes is meant to reach higher, yet it makes one unsteady; taking oversized strides is meant to move faster, yet it keeps one from going far. How are worldly people who show themselves off in hopes of gaining recognition, insist that they are right in hopes of being acknowledged, boast of their achievements, and brag about their strengths any different? From the perspective of the Dao, these are like leftover food and excess growths on the body, which people tend to detest. So those who have the Dao do not adopt such ways. As for the word “conduct” in “excess conduct,” Jiao Hong believed it should be written as “form”; in ancient usage, “conduct” and “form” could be used interchangeably.

有物混成先天地生寂兮寥兮独立而不改周行而不殆可以为天下母吾不知其名字之曰道强为之名曰大大曰逝逝曰远远曰反故道大天大地大王亦大域中有四大而王居其一焉人法地地法天天法道道法自然行而不殆可以为天下母吾不知其名字之曰道强为之名曰大大曰逝逝曰远远曰反故道大天大地大王亦大域中有四大而王居其一焉人法地地法天天法道道法自然 有物焉混然而成不知其所以成也先天地而生不知其所自始也其为物也寂兮寥兮独立无偶亘古今而不改周行于万有而未尝殆万物无不由之而生可以为天下母吾不知其名字之曰道强为之名亦曰大而已矣其大也化而不有亦可曰逝其逝也周而无外亦可曰远其远也一念之间求而即得亦可曰反逝也远也反也统以成其大而已矣故道大天大地大王亦大域中有四大而王居其一焉可不思所以全其大乎全之如何亦法地之无不载可曰反逝也远也反也统以成其大而已矣故道大天大地大王亦大域中有四大而王居其一焉可不思所以全其大乎全之如何亦法地之无不载而已地之外有天亦法天之无不覆而已生天地者道亦法道之无不生无不成而已道本自然法道者亦法其自然而已末四句皆以人言泥其辞则难通矣 重为轻根静为躁君是以圣人终日行不离辎重虽有荣观燕处超然奈何万乘之主而以身轻天下轻则失根躁则失君
Interpretation

There is something formed as a whole that existed before Heaven and Earth appeared. Silent and vast, it stands alone and never changes. Its workings reach everywhere and never come to an end. It can be regarded as the mother of all things under Heaven. I do not know its name, so I tentatively call it the Dao (the Way). If forced to give it a name, I would call it “Great.” Great, it moves and flows; this may be called “passing away.” Its movement knows no bounds; this may be called “far-reaching.” At the farthest reach, it returns to its source; this may be called “returning.” Taken together, “passing away, far-reaching, and returning” describe the vastness of the Dao.

Thus, the Dao is great, Heaven is great, Earth is great, and the ruler is also great. There are four great powers between Heaven and Earth, and the ruler is one of them. Humans take their model from Earth, Earth takes its model from Heaven, Heaven takes its model from the Dao, and the Dao takes its model from what is so of itself. The statement that the ruler is one of the four great powers reminds those who hold that position to consider how to preserve their own greatness. They should do so by taking Earth as their model: bearing all things without casting anything aside. Beyond Earth is Heaven, which covers all things. The Dao gives rise to Heaven and Earth; it gives rise to everything and brings everything to completion. Humans who take the Dao as their model should likewise follow what is natural. The final lines all explain how people should take Heaven and Earth as their model. Clinging to their literal wording, however, can make them harder to understand.

Steadiness is the foundation of recklessness, and stillness is the master of agitation. Thus, the sage goes about his affairs all day without leaving the baggage train—the carts carrying supplies on a journey, here a metaphor for a stable foundation. Even amid splendid sights, the sage remains at ease, unmoved by external things. As the ruler of a state powerful enough to command ten thousand chariots, how can one govern the world recklessly? Acting lightly means losing one’s foundation; rushing about in agitation means losing one’s mastery.

凡物之重者常能资其轻者是重为轻之根也物之静者常能主其躁者是静为躁之君也是以圣人终日行不离辎重重以自持而不失于轻也虽有荣观燕处其中而超然无累静以自主而不失于躁也奈何有以万乘之主而以身轻驰驱于天下之细故者君也是以圣人终日行不离辎重重以自持而不失于轻也虽有荣观燕处其中而超然无累静以自主而不失于躁也奈何有以万乘之主而以身轻驰驱于天下之细故者乎是轻矣轻则失其所以为根而无以为之资矣是躁矣躁则失其所以为君而无以为之主矣 辎重以衣车为喻言不离其本也荣观屋翼台榭之属亦以喻尊荣之位也 善行无辙迹善言无瑕谪善计不用筹策善闭无关楗而不可开善结无绳约而不可解是以圣人常善救人故无弃人常善救物故无弃物是谓袭明故善人不善人之师不善人善人之资不贵其师不爱其资虽智大迷是谓要妙
Interpretation

Heavy things can often support light things, so heaviness is the foundation of lightness. Quiet things can often restrain restless things, so stillness is the master of agitation.

Therefore, the sage travels all day without leaving behind the baggage carts that carry provisions, using steadiness and composure to keep himself in check and never losing his balance through carelessness. Even amid splendid palaces, pavilions, and towers, he remains at ease, detached and unburdened, self-possessed in stillness and never led astray by agitation. Why should a ruler with ten thousand chariots rush heedlessly about over the affairs of the world? To do so is to be frivolous. Frivolity means losing the steadiness that serves as one’s foundation, leaving nothing firm to rely on. Agitation means losing the stillness that serves as one’s master, leaving no inner anchor to depend upon.

Here, “baggage carts” use carts carrying provisions as a metaphor for never departing from one’s roots. “Splendid palaces” refers to magnificent buildings such as halls and terraces, and also serves as a metaphor for an exalted and prominent position.

One skilled at walking leaves no visible tracks; one skilled at speaking makes no mistakes in words; one skilled at planning needs no counters or calculating tools; one skilled at closing a door needs no bolt to keep it shut; one skilled at tying a knot needs no rope to keep it secure.

Thus, the sage is always skilled at guiding people, and so no one is cast aside. He is also skilled at making use of all things, and so nothing is cast aside. This is called “following and inheriting the clear Dao”—responding to and carrying forward what is understood through the Dao. The good person is the teacher of the person who is not good; the person who is not good can also serve as a lesson for the good person. If one does not respect one’s teacher or value the people and things from which one can learn, then even if one considers oneself wise, one will fall into great confusion. This is a profound and subtle truth.

人之善行者无辙迹行所宜行也善言者无瑕谪言所宜言也善计者不用筹策理必有至也善闭无关楗而不可开操得其要也善结无绳约而不可解众所同欲也圣人有行所宜行也善言者无瑕谪言所宜言也善计者不用筹策理必有至也善闭无关楗而不可开操得其要也善结无绳约而不可解众所同欲也圣人有是善是以常以人治人是善救人故人各得其所而无弃人常因物付物是善救物故物各遂其生而无弃物是谓善用其明以治人物也夫天下之人善不善尽之善人不善人之师也不善人善人之资也知其为师而贵之知其为资而爱之则所以处善不善者各得矣是所谓善救人无弃人也不然而不贵其师不爱其资虽自以为智实大迷而已夫此师与资之间即救人之要妙在善用之耳袭明袭传袭也言以己之明被之人物也一解如掩袭之袭言密用其明也 知其雄守其雌为天下溪为天下溪常德不离复归于婴儿知其白守其黑为天下式为天下式常德不忒复归于无极知其荣守其辱为天下谷为天下谷常德乃足复归于朴朴散则为器圣人用之则为官长故大制不割
Interpretation

Those skilled at walking leave no traces such as wheel tracks or footprints, because they always follow the right path. Those skilled at speaking make no verbal mistakes, because they say only what is appropriate. Those skilled at planning need no counting tokens or tally sticks to handle matters well, because the principles of things naturally lead to their outcomes. Those skilled at closing a door need no bolt to keep it shut, because they grasp what is essential. Those skilled at tying knots need no rope to make them impossible to untie, because they accord with what people share in common.

The sage understands these principles too. The sage acts appropriately, speaks without error, plans in accord with reason, grasps what is essential and knows how to constrain, and can also follow the wishes of the people. The sage is therefore always able to govern people well and help them, finding a proper place for each person and leaving no one out. The sage arranges things in accord with their own qualities, and so can help all things, allowing each to grow and flourish in its own way and leaving nothing out. This is called skillfully using one’s discernment to govern people and things.

Among the people under Heaven, some are good and some are not. The good are teachers to those who are not good; those who are not good can also serve as lessons for the good. Knowing that the good are teachers, one honors them. Knowing that those who are not good can offer a lesson, one treats them with kindness. In this way, one treats both the good and the not good appropriately. This is what it means to help people well and abandon no one. If one neither honors teachers nor treats kindly those who can serve as lessons, then despite considering oneself clever, one is in fact deeply confused. The key to the relationship between teacher and lesson lies in skillful use. The phrase “attaining illumination” uses “attaining” in the sense of receiving and passing something on: it means using one’s discernment to influence people and all things. Another interpretation understands “attaining” as acting in concealment, meaning that one uses one’s discernment unseen.

Know the strong, yet keep to the weak, and you can become the valley of the world. As the valley of the world, your constant De will never depart, and you will return to the pure innocence of an infant. Know what is bright, yet keep to what is dim, and you can become the model for the world. As the model for the world, your constant De will never go astray, and you will return to the boundless. Know what is honored, yet keep to what is humbled, and you can become the valley of the world. As the valley of the world, your constant De will be full, and you will return to the uncarved simplicity.

When uncarved simplicity is divided, it becomes the many particular things. The sage puts them to use and becomes the leader of the officials. Thus, truly great governance does not divide the whole.

Even while knowing the strong, one can still follow the valley’s lowly, yielding way and become the valley of the world. Constant De is thereby made full, and one returns to simplicity. When simplicity is divided, it becomes the many implements; the sage puts them to use and leads the officials. Thus, great governance does not divide the whole.

未尝不知其雄而能用其下谷为天下谷常德乃足复归于朴朴散则为器圣人用之则为官长故大制不割 未尝不知其雄而能用其刚也乃守其雌而以柔为主是处其身于卑下而为天下溪也为天下溪则常德抱而不离而复归于婴儿之无我矣未尝不知其白而能用明也乃守其黑而以晦为主是其身常自俯仰而为天下式也为天下式则常德无少忒而复归于无极之形矣未尝不知其荣而能自高也乃守其辱而以退逊为主是以其身含纳垢浊而为天下谷也为天下谷则常充足而复归于混成之朴矣朴者不可以一器名者也及其散则为器器仅一官之守耳圣人用之则器反为朴不为官而为官之长故以大道制天下者不事乎裁割之小数也 式字诸说解作法愚意溪谷皆借用字则式字似亦谓车式耳测时之器亦曰式人自取正而我无心似之 将欲取天下而为之吾见其不得已天下神器割之小数也 式字诸说解作法愚意溪谷皆借用字则式字似亦谓车式耳测时之器亦曰式人自取正而我无心似之 将欲取天下而为之吾见其不得已天下神器不可为也为者败之执者失之故物或行或随或呴或吹或强或羸或载或隳是以圣人去甚去奢去泰
Interpretation

Though you understand what is strong and can wield strength, you still hold to what is soft and yielding, making gentleness your guiding principle. In this way, you place yourself below and become the stream of the world. As the stream of the world, you can keep constant De (Virtue/Power) close within you, never letting it depart, and return to the state of an infant, free of self-interest.

Though you understand what is bright and can make use of light, you still hold to what is dark and hidden, keeping yourself concealed and unexposed. In this way, you adapt to circumstances and become the standard of the world. As the standard of the world, your constant De will never stray in the slightest, and you can return to a state without bounds.

Though you understand what brings honor and can make yourself illustrious, you still hold to what is humiliating, making humility and yielding your guiding principles. Thus you can contain filth and muddy currents and become the valley of the world. As the valley of the world, you can remain constantly full and return to a state of unformed, undivided simplicity.

What is called “the uncarved block” cannot be defined by the name of any particular vessel. Only after the block is divided does it become the various vessels, each with just one function. When the sage makes use of the uncarved block, the functions of the vessels can return to wholeness: the sage does not govern only one function, but directs them all. Thus, when governing the world by the Great Dao, one should not be confined to small methods that cut things apart.

Most commentators explain the character “model” as meaning “rule.” I think that since “stream” and “valley” both borrow the names of objects, “model” may also refer to the crossbar on a carriage. An instrument for determining the seasons is also called a “model.” People use it to correct themselves, but I do not set out to imitate it.

If one wishes to take possession of the world and govern it, I think this is ultimately impossible. The world is a sacred vessel; it cannot be made or altered at will. Acting on it at will will ruin it; clinging to it will make it slip away. Among the myriad things, some move ahead and others follow; some are gentle and others hurried; some are strong and others frail; some bear up and others collapse. Therefore, the sage dispenses with extremes, extravagance, and excess.

将欲取天下而有所作为有所执持以为之吾见其不得而为矣何也天下本神灵之重器不可以一人之私智强为之也为者斯败之执者斯失之矣故天下之物或前行者或后随者或呴以为温者或吹以为寒者或强而好胜者或羸而自守者或载而成者或隳之矣故天下之物或前行者或后随者或呴以为温者或吹以为寒者或强而好胜者或羸而自守者或载而成者或隳而毁者材质不同取舍亦异欲以一人为之执之难矣是以圣人因其自然而无容心但于其中去其甚者去其奢者去其泰者而已无余事矣何必更有所为哉 以道佐人主者不以兵强天下其事好还师之所出荆棘生焉大兵之后必有凶年善者果而已不敢以取强果而勿矜果而勿伐果而勿骄果而不得已果而勿强物壮则老是谓不道不道早已
Interpretation

Those who would govern the world but insist on taking action and maintaining control, forcing their rule through sheer personal will, will not, in my view, succeed. Why? The world is a sacred and precious vessel; it cannot be ruled by one person’s private cleverness or forced into submission. Forceful action will ruin things; clinging to control will ultimately mean losing it.

The myriad things of the world are all different. Some move ahead, others follow behind; some breathe out warmth, others blow out cold. Some are strong and competitive, others are yielding and keep to themselves. Some bear and bring things to completion, others damage and destroy them. Things differ in their nature, and their choices differ too. It is truly difficult to govern them all by one person’s will. So the sage follows things as they are, imposing no personal intentions upon them. The sage only removes what is excessive, extravagant, and extreme, and does nothing more. Why, then, deliberately set out to act?

Those who use the Dao to assist a ruler do not use military force to dominate the world. Resorting to arms often brings retaliation. Where armies have passed, thorns and brambles grow; after a great war, famine is sure to follow. A skilled commander does no more than achieve the objective and dares not use it as an occasion to dominate. Having won, the commander does not boast, show off, or grow arrogant. Arms are used only when there is no other choice, and victory is not used to assert strength. When things reach their height of strength and growth, they begin to age. This is called departing from the Dao; what departs from the Dao soon comes to an end.

Those who use the Dao to assist a ruler do not use military force to contend for dominion over the world. Warfare readily invites retaliation between sides. Once the objective has been achieved, one should stop and not use the occasion to dominate. Having won, one does not boast, show off, or grow arrogant. Arms are used only when there is no other choice, and victory is not used to assert strength. After things reach their height, they decline into age. This is called departing from the Dao; what departs from the Dao soon comes to an end.

以道佐人主者不以兵强取于天下夫兵之为事好相还者果而已不敢以取强果而勿矜果而勿伐果而勿骄果而不得已果而勿强物壮则老是谓不道不道早已 以道佐人主者不以兵强取于天下夫兵之为事好相还报师之所处荆棘生焉大兵之后必有凶年兵之为害如此可以佐人主强天下乎所谓善用兵者在能自果断而已耳不敢以之取强也其所果者如何果而勿矜也果而勿伐也果而勿骄也果而不得已也果而勿强也天下盈虚之理凡物之壮者则无不老以兵取强是谓恃壮而不道不道者必早已亦何能终强乎 焦氏云不得已为之难也果而勿矜以下五而字当读如于字人方果于彼我独果于此也 夫佳以兵取强是谓恃壮而不道不道者必早已亦何能终强乎 焦氏云不得已为之难也果而勿矜以下五而字当读如于字人方果于彼我独果于此也 夫佳兵者不祥之器物或恶之故有道者不处君子居则贵左用兵则贵右兵者不祥之器非君子之器不得已而用之恬淡为上胜而不美而美之者是乐杀人夫乐杀人者不可得志于天下矣吉事尚左凶事尚右偏将军处左上将军处右言以丧礼处之杀人众多以悲哀泣之战胜以丧礼处之
Interpretation

Those who assist a ruler through the Dao do not rely on military force to impose their will or seize all under Heaven. War readily invites retaliation, and the places where armies have been stationed grow over with brambles. After a great war, years of famine often follow. The calamities brought by weapons and warfare are so grave—how could they be used to assist a ruler and impose one’s will upon all under Heaven?

Those who are skilled in warfare act decisively only when there is no other choice; they do not use force to vie for superiority. Though decisive, they do not boast, show off, or act arrogantly. They act this way only because they have no alternative, and do not use it to assert their strength. All things under Heaven follow the principle of waxing and waning, fullness and decline: anything that reaches the height of its strength will eventually grow old and diminish. To vie for superiority through war is to rely on strength while going against the Great Dao. What goes against the Dao must soon perish—how could it remain strong for long?

Jiao, the commentator, says: “‘When there is no other choice’ means that the matter is difficult to resolve. In the five instances below, the character er should be read as yu, meaning ‘in’ or ‘at’: while others are busy acting decisively in matters of war, I act decisively only when there is no other choice.”

Sharp weapons are ill-omened things, and people generally detest them. For this reason, those who possess the Dao do not use them as their ordinary means. In the usual conduct of a gentleman, the left is honored; when weapons are used, the right is honored. Weapons are ill-omened instruments, not things a gentleman should use. They are used only when there is no other choice, and calm detachment is the best attitude toward their use. Even when victorious, one should not regard victory as cause for celebration. To treat victory as a joyful occasion is to take pleasure in killing. Those who take pleasure in killing cannot prevail under Heaven.

In rites of celebration, the left is honored; in rites of mourning, the right is honored. The deputy general stands on the left, and the supreme general on the right. This means that war should be treated with the solemnity of a funeral rite. When many people have been killed, one should grieve and mourn for them. Even after victory, the proper response is to conduct oneself according to the rites of mourning.

夫兵之佳者不祥之器也物或恶之故有道者不以其事自处也君子居则贵左用兵者则居右与君子道反因知兵者不祥之器非君子之器也苟其不得已而用之亦惟以恬淡为上及其胜也亦不自以为美使胜而以为美是乐杀人也乐杀人者不可以得志于天下苟其不得已而用之亦惟以恬淡为上及其胜也亦不自以为美使胜而以为美是乐杀人也乐杀人者不可以得志于天下矣吉事尚左凶事尚右礼之定体也偏将军居左上将军居右是则以丧礼处之矣甚矣兵之为不祥也凡军礼杀敌众多以悲哀泣之战胜而归以丧礼处之甚矣胜之非美而杀人之非所乐也恬淡安静也 道常无名朴虽小天下不敢臣侯王若能守万物将自宾天地相合以降甘露人莫之令而自均始制有名名亦既有夫亦将知止知止所以不殆譬道之在天下犹川谷之于江海
Interpretation

Weapons are instruments of ill omen, and ordinary people generally despise them. For this reason, a person who follows the Dao does not make warfare their responsibility. In ordinary times, the gentleman honors the left; in wartime, the right is honored. This reverses the gentleman’s usual way. From this we can see that weapons are inauspicious things, not instruments a gentleman takes pleasure in using. If warfare is truly unavoidable, the best course is to remain calm and detached. Even after winning a battle, one should not boast of victory. To take pride in victory is to delight in killing. Those who delight in killing cannot fulfill their aims under Heaven.

When warfare is unavoidable, the best course is to remain calm and detached; even after winning a battle, one should not regard oneself as honored. To treat victory as something good is to delight in killing. Those who delight in killing will ultimately be unable to prevail under Heaven.

In auspicious ceremonies, the left is honored; in funerary rites, the right is honored. This is the usual ritual order. The deputy general stands on the left, while the supreme commander stands on the right. This shows that positions in the army are arranged according to funeral rites. Clearly, warfare is truly inauspicious. Military ritual holds that when many enemies have been killed, they should be mourned with grief; even upon returning victorious, one should conduct oneself according to funeral rites. This shows that victory is not something to celebrate, and killing is certainly not something to enjoy. “Calm and detached” means quiet and at peace.

The Dao is always nameless and without form, like an uncarved block of wood. Though small, nothing under Heaven can control it. If the lords and kings can hold fast to it, the myriad things will naturally come to them. When the Qi of Heaven and Earth comes together, sweet dew descends. No one needs to command it; the dew falls evenly of its own accord.

Once the myriad things begin to be distinguished and named, and names have come into being, one should know when to stop. Knowing when to stop allows one to avoid danger. The Dao is present throughout the world just as rivers and streams flow into the great seas.

The Dao takes humility as its foundation, and so nothing under Heaven can control it. If the lords and kings can hold fast to the Dao, the myriad things will naturally come to them. When the Qi of Heaven and Earth comes together, sweet dew descends. No one needs to command it; it falls evenly of its own accord. The Dao is present throughout the world just as rivers and streams flow into the great seas.

道以无下不敢臣侯王若能守万物将自宾天地相合以降甘露人莫之令而自均始制有名名亦既有夫亦将知止知止所以不殆譬道之在天下犹川谷之于江海 道以无名为常但可谓之朴而已是朴也夷也希也微也可谓小矣朴虽小万物皆自此生万物皆自此处出何所不统天下岂有敢臣之者乎侯王若能守之则万物将自宾其和气所致天地相合以降甘露其盛德所孚人不待令而自均一守朴之效如此夫侯王之守朴也守其常无名者而已守其无名始可以制有名礼乐政刑之属皆自此起然不可逐末而忘本也名亦既有夫亦将知止而不过无求多焉仍其无名始可以制有名礼乐政刑之属皆自此起然不可逐末而忘本也名亦既有夫亦将知止而不过无求多焉仍镇以无名之朴而已知止如此所以无危殆之患也所以然者何也譬道之在天下犹川谷之于江海川谷以江海为归天下以道为归但恐人君不知守此朴耳 知人者智自知者明胜人者有力自胜者强知足者富强行者有志不失其所者久死而不亡者寿 知人之是非者谓之智自知其得失者谓之明能胜人者谓之有力自胜其私欲者谓之强知足而无求者谓之富强行道而不息者谓之有志物变无穷知其所而不为所变者谓之久死生之变甚大虽死而未尝亡者谓之寿 智明力强以内外对言富而有志以能行知止对言久寿以不变于生不亡于死对言不失其所死而不亡皆守常道之效也
Interpretation

The Dao is ordinarily “nameless,” but we may reluctantly call it “the Uncarved Block”—its natural, unworked state. Though plain, silent, and subtle, it may seem small, yet it is the source from which all things grow. All things arise from it and take shape through it. What could it fail to contain? Who in the world would dare claim mastery over it?

If rulers can hold fast to the Uncarved Block, all things will naturally come to them. Yin and Yang will harmonize, Heaven and Earth will unite, and sweet dew will descend. The influence of profound De will transform people’s hearts, and they will naturally move toward balance without waiting for commands. This is the effect of holding fast to the Uncarved Block.

For rulers to hold fast to the Uncarved Block is to keep to the constant, nameless Dao. Only by holding to the nameless Dao can they govern things that have names and forms. Systems such as ritual and music, edicts, and punishments all arise from it, but one must not pursue the branches and forget the root. Once names and systems have been established, one must know when to stop and not seek excess; the nameless Uncarved Block should still anchor them. Knowing when one has enough keeps one from danger. Why? The Dao in the world is like the rivers and streams that ultimately flow into the sea: just as they return to the sea, the world returns to the Dao. The only concern is that rulers may not know how to hold fast to the Uncarved Block.

To understand others is called “wisdom”; to understand oneself is called “clarity.” To overcome others is to have strength; to master oneself is to be strong. To know contentment is to be rich; to strive to follow the Dao is to have resolve. One who does not lose sight of the root in the conduct of life can endure. When the body dies but the Dao does not perish, this is called longevity.

To discern what is right and wrong in others is called wisdom; to understand one’s own gains and losses is called clarity. To overcome others is to have power; to conquer one’s own desires is to be strong. To be content and free of greed is to be rich; to persist in following the Dao without slackening is to have resolve. Amid the endless changes of all things, to recognize one’s root and not be swept along by change is to endure. Life and death bring great change; when the body dies but the Dao has not perished, this is called longevity.

Wisdom and clarity, power and strength refer respectively to the outward and inward. Richness and resolve refer respectively to knowing contentment and being able to put the Dao into practice. Endurance and longevity refer respectively to not losing one’s root through change, and to the Dao’s not perishing when the body dies. By holding to the constant Dao, one can avoid losing one’s place and die without perishing.

大道泛以内外对言富而有志以能行知止对言久寿以不变于生不亡于死对言不失其所死而不亡皆守常道之效也 大道泛兮其可左右万物恃之以生而不辞功成不名有爱养万物而不为主常无欲可名于小万物归焉而不知主可名于大是以圣人终不为大故能成其大 大道之为体泛兮其可以左可以右执一求之而不得也万物恃之以生未尝辞也生物之功既成又不自名以为有爱养万物矣而又不为主自其常无欲言之希夷无形可名于小自其万物归焉而不知主言之容受无外可名于大道体之妙如此是以体道之圣人终不自以为大也故能成其大希夷无形可名于小自其万物归焉而不知主言之容受无外可名于大道体之妙如此是以体道之圣人终不自以为大也故能成其大 执大象天下往往而不害安平泰乐与饵过客止道之出口淡乎其无味视之不足见听之不足闻用之不可既 能执大象以御天下则天下皆归往之矣天下皆往而我未尝有所作为而害之则往者无不安安而且平平而且泰矣此大道之为用也若夫作乐设饵以待来者过客非不止也乐阕饵尽将舍之而去矣道之出口淡乎其无味也视之不足见听之不足闻也及其用之则不可既岂乐与饵之比乎 陆希声云大象者道也苏子由云道非有无故谓之大象 乐饵盖喻小惠悦物者 将欲歙之必固张之将欲弱之必固强之将欲废之苏子由云道非有无故谓之大象 乐饵盖喻小惠悦物者
Interpretation

The Great Dao is vast and boundless, as if it were everywhere; it can be found to the left or to the right. All things depend on it to grow, yet it never refuses them. When its work of bringing forth and nurturing all things is complete, it does not claim the credit. It cherishes and raises all things, yet does not rule over them.

In its aspect of being constantly free of desire, still, and without form, the Great Dao is so subtle that it can scarcely be perceived; in this sense, it may be called “small.” In its aspect of receiving all things, which return to it without knowing it is their ruler, it embraces everything and has no bounds; in this sense, it may be called “great.” Such is the mystery of the Great Dao. The sage follows the Dao and never considers himself great; for this very reason, he can accomplish true greatness.

Grasp the “Great Image” (the Dao’s overarching principle) to govern the world, and the people of the world will turn to you. Once they have turned to you, if you do not act recklessly or harm them, they can become settled and peaceful, and so attain well-being. This is the function of the Dao.

Music and fine food can persuade passersby to stop, but when the music ends and the food is gone, the travelers move on. The Dao, when spoken of, seems bland and tasteless; look for it and it cannot be seen, listen for it and it cannot be heard. Yet its use is inexhaustible. How could it be compared with music and fine food? Lu Xisheng says that the “Great Image” is the Dao. Su Ziyou says that the Dao belongs neither to being nor to nonbeing, and is therefore called the “Great Image.” Music and fine food are metaphors for pleasing others with small favors.

If you want to make it contract, you must first let it expand; if you want to weaken it, you must first let it grow strong; if you want to cast it aside…

将欲歙之必固张之将欲弱之必固强之将欲废之必固兴之将欲夺之必固与之是谓微明柔胜刚弱胜强鱼不可脱于渊国之利器不可以示人 天道之盈虚人事之倚伏皆有自然必至之势如将欲歙之也必已张之矣将欲弱之也必已强之矣将欲废之也必已兴之矣将欲夺之也必已与之矣此其理至微也而实至明是谓微明大要柔者可以胜刚弱者可以胜强而已此理可以自养亦可以自藏是鱼之深渊也此理可以御患亦可以为患是国之利器也鱼不可脱于渊脱于渊则死之徒矣国之利器不可以示人示人则或窃之而为害不胜言矣 道常御患亦可以为患是国之利器也鱼不可脱于渊脱于渊则死之徒矣国之利器不可以示人示人则或窃之而为害不胜言矣 道常无为而无不为侯王若能守万物将自化化而欲作吾将镇之以无名之朴无名之朴亦将不欲不欲以静天下将自正 道体本无而应用则有故常无为而无不为侯王若能守此道其于天下亦以无为此为之万物将自化而顺此无为之治矣万物既化苟有欲起而生其智巧者吾亦将以无名之朴镇定之且并此无名之朴亦将不欲守道至此可谓一无所欲而真能静矣天下有不各返于不欲而自正者乎 老子说略卷上 ●钦定四库全书 老子说略卷下 济阳张尔岐撰 ○下篇
Interpretation

To draw something in, you must first let it expand; to weaken it, you must first let it grow strong; to discard it, you must first let it flourish; to take something from it, you must first give to it. This is called “subtle illumination”: clear insight that emerges from the slightest signs. Fish cannot leave the depths, and the state’s sharp weapons must not be casually shown to others.

The fullness and decline of Heaven’s Way, and the dependencies and changes of human affairs, follow natural patterns that will in time unfold. To draw something in, you must first let it expand; to weaken it, you must first let it grow strong; to discard it, you must first let it flourish; to take something from it, you must first give to it. The principle here is exceedingly subtle, yet also clear. This is called “subtle illumination.” In brief, the soft can overcome the hard, and the weak can overcome the strong. This principle can be used to cultivate oneself and to keep out of harm’s way, just as fish must hide in the depths. It can also be used to ward off danger, yet may itself become a source of danger, like the state’s sharp weapons. Fish cannot leave the depths; once they do, they can only die. The state’s sharp weapons must not be shown to others. If displayed, they may be stolen and used to cause calamities beyond telling.

The Dao is often used to ward off danger, yet may itself become a source of danger, like the state’s sharp weapons. Fish cannot leave the depths; once they do, they can only die. The state’s sharp weapons must not be shown to others. If displayed, they may be stolen and used to cause calamities beyond telling.

The Dao—the fundamental principle by which all things move—always follows its own nature and does not force action, yet nothing remains undone. If rulers can hold fast to the Dao, all things will transform of themselves. After they have transformed, should desires arise and crafty schemes take root, I will use the “nameless uncarved simplicity”—a plain state untouched by human artifice and distinctions of name—to settle them. When even this nameless simplicity is no longer something to desire, and stillness free of desire is reached, the world will naturally return to the right path.

The Dao’s substance is empty and formless, yet when put to use it produces effects. It follows its own nature and does not force action, yet nothing remains undone. If rulers can hold fast to the Dao, they too will govern the world by following its natural course and refraining from imposed action. All things will then transform of themselves and follow rule through Wuwei (non-action). After they have transformed, should desires arise and give rise to clever schemes, I will use nameless uncarved simplicity to settle them. If they then seek nothing further, even in holding to nameless uncarved simplicity, they can be said to be without desire and to have truly reached stillness. How could all things under Heaven fail to return, each in its own way, to a state without desire and naturally find the right path?

An Outline of Explanations of the Laozi, Part One

Imperially Commissioned Complete Library of the Four Treasuries

An Outline of Explanations of the Laozi, Part Two

Written by Zhang Erqi of Jiyang

Part Two

上德不德是以有德下德不失德是以无德上德无为而无以为下德为之而有以下 济阳张尔岐撰 ○下篇 上德不德是以有德下德不失德是以无德上德无为而无以为下德为之而有以为上仁为之而无以为上义为之而有以为上礼为之而莫之应则攘臂而仍之故失道而后德失德而后仁失仁而后义失义而后礼夫礼者忠信之薄而乱之首也前识者道之华而愚之始也是以大丈夫处其厚不处其薄居其实不居其华故去彼取此
Interpretation

Those of the highest De (Virtue/Power) do not regard themselves as possessing De, and so truly have it. Those of lesser De never let go of their attachment to De, and therefore do not truly have it. Those of the highest De follow their natural course, with no intention of doing anything and no deliberate aim. Those of lesser De act with a definite purpose.

Those of the highest benevolence act, but without a definite purpose. Those of the highest righteousness act with a definite purpose. Those of the highest ritual propriety also act, but if they receive no response, they roll up their sleeves and force others to comply. Thus, only after the Dao (the Way) is lost do people speak of De; only after De is lost do they speak of benevolence; only after benevolence is lost do they speak of righteousness; and only after righteousness is lost do they speak of ritual propriety. Ritual propriety is a sign that loyalty and trust have grown thin, and the beginning of disorder. Taking oneself to be prescient is the Dao’s ornamental surface—and the beginning of folly.

Therefore, the great person stands in what is solid and simple, and does not dwell in what is shallow and showy. They hold to what is real and do not pursue what is ornamental. So they set aside one and choose the other.

德之上者不自有其德是以有德德之下者勉强执持而不失其德是以德未至而无德其中存之不同如此德之上者无所作为非故无为也率德之自然而已无余事无所用为也德之下者则为之矣然虑而后获为而后成实不得不出于为也其发用之不同如此德者道备于身之称若夫一德着闻者有上仁焉有上义焉有上礼虑而后获为而后成实不得不出于为也其发用之不同如此德者道备于身之称若夫一德着闻者有上仁焉有上义焉有上礼焉上仁事主于爱不能无为矣为之而生于心之不自已实无所勉而为之也上义事主于宜不能无为矣谓其宜也而为之是有以为也上礼以文饰情情积于中则为礼以达之然节文详缛非众之所必能也为礼而莫之应者有矣莫之应则不免攘臂而仍之又非仅有为而已也故失道而后德失德而后仁失仁而后义失义而后礼凡自道五降而后至于礼也夫礼者文也文胜则情衰礼者让也让不应则争起礼岂非忠信之薄而乱之首乎人之前识者聪明外耀矜外则遗内推索过劳明过则生惑前识者岂非道之礼也夫礼者文也文胜则情衰礼者让也让不应则争起礼岂非忠信之薄而乱之首乎人之前识者聪明外耀矜外则遗内推索过劳明过则生惑前识者岂非道之华而愚之始乎薄以生乱华以致愚如此是以大丈夫处其厚不处其薄居其实不居其华故去彼智礼而取此道德也
Interpretation

The highest De does not claim virtue as its own; for this reason, it truly possesses De. The lower form of De clings to virtue through effort, afraid of losing it, and so has not yet attained true De. The two differ in how they are held within the heart, and their effects differ as well.

The highest De does not act deliberately. This does not mean intentionally doing nothing; it means simply acting in accord with De’s natural state, without unnecessary contrivance or deliberate pursuit. The lower form of De requires action: one gains something only after reflection and achieves something only after acting. It truly has to rely on action to accomplish its aims.

“De” refers to the state in which the Dao is present within oneself. Particular forms of De may be especially prominent—for example, the highest benevolence, the highest righteousness, and the highest ritual propriety—and each has its own expression. The highest benevolence centers on caring for others and cannot be entirely without action. Yet its action arises from the heart, coming spontaneously rather than from force. The highest righteousness centers on what is fitting: one acts because one judges an action to be fitting, and this already involves deliberate effort. The highest ritual propriety uses ritual forms to give expression to feelings. When feelings gather within, they are expressed through ritual. But ritual has many rules and forms that not everyone can follow. Someone may perform the rites and receive no response. When there is no response, one may have to roll up one’s sleeves and force the other person to comply. This goes beyond merely acting.

Thus, only after the Dao is lost does one speak of De; only after De is lost does one speak of benevolence; only after benevolence is lost does one speak of righteousness; and only after righteousness is lost does one speak of ritual propriety. The decline from the Dao proceeds step by step, reaching ritual propriety only at the end. Ritual propriety is outward ornamentation; when ornamentation becomes excessive, inner feeling fades. Ritual calls for yielding, but if yielding is not met in return, conflict arises. Is ritual not a sign that loyalty and trust have grown weak, and the beginning of disorder?

When people rely too heavily on foresight, their cleverness and skill show outwardly. When they praise outward appearances alone, they neglect the heart within. Excessive analysis and speculation also wear people down, while too much cleverness can easily lead to confusion. Is this kind of foresight not the Dao’s superficial display, and the beginning of folly? Ritual weakens loyalty and trust and gives rise to disorder; superficial display leads people toward folly. For this reason, the great man grounds himself in what is substantial and does not turn toward what is shallow; he rests in what is genuine and does not chase after superficial display. He therefore sets aside outward cleverness and ritual forms, and chooses the Dao and De.

昔之得一者天得一以清地得一以宁神得一以灵谷得一以盈万物得一以生侯王得一以为天下贞其致之一也天无以清将恐裂地无以宁将恐发神无以灵将恐歇谷无以盈将恐竭万物无以生将恐灭侯王无以为贞而贵高将恐蹶故贵以贱为本高以下为基是以侯王自称孤寡不谷此其以贱为本邪非乎故致数舆无舆不欲琭琭如玉落落如石 昔之得一者天得一以清地得一以宁神得一以灵谷得一以盈万物得一以生侯王得一以为天下贞虽有天地人物之殊其不可不致此一则同也使天无以清将恐裂地无以宁将恐发神无以灵将恐歇谷无以盈将恐竭万谷得一以盈万物得一以生侯王得一以为天下贞虽有天地人物之殊其不可不致此一则同也使天无以清将恐裂地无以宁将恐发神无以灵将恐歇谷无以盈将恐竭万物无以生将恐灭侯王无以贞而徒居高贵之势将恐蹶甚矣一之不可不致也侯王之致一者如何亦曰不自贵不自高而已贵者以贱为本高者以下为基如之何可以自贵自高也是以侯王自谓孤寡不谷以贱者自名此其不自贵而以贱为本耶非乎天下之势合众贱以成贵如车之合轮辕轸盖以成车非贱则无贵如致数舆则无舆侯王能忘其贵忘其高乃可以为天下贞耳不欲琭琭如玉落落如石过为分别也 反者道之动弱者道之用天下之物生于有有生于无
Interpretation

In the past, those who attained the One through the Dao—the fundamental principle underlying all things in the universe—brought clarity to heaven and peace to earth. Spirits became efficacious, valleys were filled, all things grew, and rulers became the rightful masters of the world. Heaven, earth, spirits, valleys, all things, and rulers are different, yet none can do without the same fundamental source.

If heaven could not remain clear, it would likely collapse. If earth could not remain peaceful, it would likely shake. If spirits could not be efficacious, they would likely lose their power. If valleys could not remain full, they would likely dry up. If all things could not grow, they would likely perish. And if rulers could not use the Dao to set themselves right, relying only on their high status, they too would likely fall. Clearly, the One is essential to everything.

The exalted takes the lowly as its root, and the high rests on the low. That is why rulers call themselves “orphaned,” “bereft,” or “unworthy”: they place themselves below others and take the lowly as their foundation. The world’s dignity is made up of many parts that may seem lowly, just as a cart is made of wheels, shafts, axles, and a canopy. Without those parts, there would be no cart. Only by setting aside their own dignity and high rank can rulers become the rightful masters of the world.

Do not regard yourself as precious as jade, nor set yourself apart as proudly as a stone. Both jade and stone stand out in their own way, reflecting an excessive distinction between high and low.

Reversal is the movement of the Dao; weakness is the way it works. All things under heaven arise from being, and being arises from nonbeing.

人不外驰而内反即入道之肇端反者道之动也有道者必不与物竞而贞耳不欲琭琭如玉落落如石过为分别也 反者道之动弱者道之用天下之物生于有有生于无 人不外驰而内反即入道之肇端反者道之动也有道者必不与物竞而自处弱弱者道之用也所以然者盖以天下之物皆生于有而有则生于无无者道之本然也反者舍有而趋无以有趋无故云道之动也及其与道为一无静可名何有于动乎弱者有而不离于无不离于无故云道之用也若究其体则亦无而已矣 上士闻道勤而行之中士闻道若存若亡下士闻道大笑之不笑不足以为道故建言有之明道若昧进道若退夷道若类上德若谷大白若辱广德若不足建德若偷质真若渝大方无隅大器晚成大音希声大象无形道隐无名夫惟道善贷且成 上士闻道勤而行之中士闻道若存若亡而已不能必行也下士闻道则大笑之不为下士所笑不足以为道何也古之建言者有之名夫惟道善贷且成
Interpretation

People cease chasing things outside themselves and return to their inner nature. This is the starting point for entering the Dao (the Way). “The movement of the Dao is return”: the Dao’s workings take the form of a turning back. A person who has the Dao does not compete with external things but rests in softness and weakness. The Dao works through softness and weakness because everything under Heaven arises from “being,” while “being” arises from “nonbeing.” “Nonbeing” is the Dao’s original state. To return is to let go of attachment to “being” and move toward “nonbeing”; this is why it is called the Dao’s movement. When a person becomes one with the Dao, there is no longer any basis for speaking of stillness or movement—so how could one speak of “movement”? Softness and weakness belong to the realm of “being,” yet do not depart from “nonbeing”; this is why they are called the Dao’s workings. At their source, they are nothing but “nonbeing.”

Those of the highest capacity hear the teaching and diligently put it into practice. Those of middling capacity hear it and half understand: at times they remember, at times they forget. Those of the lowest capacity hear it and laugh. If a teaching does not provoke laughter from those of the lowest capacity, it is not worthy of being called the Dao. Why is this so? The ancients made this point in their sayings: the bright Dao seems dim; the way forward seems to lead backward; the level path seems rough. The highest De (Virtue/Power) is as open and receptive as a valley. What is purest seems stained; abundant De seems deficient; firm strength seems slack; what is genuine and unadorned seems to change. The greatest square has no corners; the greatest vessel is completed last; the greatest sound is scarcely heard; the greatest image has no form. The Dao is hidden and does not show itself, and has no fixed name. Yet only the Dao is able to give generously and bring all things to fulfillment.

上士闻道勤而行之中士闻道若存若亡而已不能必行也下士闻道则大笑之不为下士所笑不足以为道何也古之建言者有之矣曰明道者自明而已不与世竞明故若昧进道者自进而已不与世竞进故若退夷道者与世无所不平虽非人之所及也而与人若类上德者不自有其德其卑下若谷大白者不离染以为白其同尘若辱广德者不自以为广常若有所不足建德者勤于治性接物必简故见为苟且而若偷质真者任天而游无所执着故见为不常而若渝大方正内而行无事矜暴故不见其廉隅大器晚成其成不可遽见大音希声其声不可得闻大象无形其形不可得容此岂中下之人计量之所其廉隅大器晚成其成不可遽见大音希声其声不可得闻大象无形其形不可得容此岂中下之人计量之所能至安得不非笑之哉盖道之本体隐而难见无所可名及其发见于物则惟道善贷而且善成万物并受其赐而又未能知之其取笑于下士宜耳 道生一一生二二生三三生万物万物负阴而抱阳冲气以为和人之所恶惟孤寡不谷而王公以为称故物或损之而益或益之而损人之所教我亦教之强梁者不得其死吾将以为教父 道生一一生二无名天地之始也二生三三生万物有名万物之之而损人之所教我亦教之强梁者不得其死吾将以为教父
Interpretation

People of great understanding hear of the Dao (the Way) and diligently put it into practice. Those of middling understanding hear of it and are half convinced, half doubtful, often failing to persevere. Those of shallow understanding hear of it and burst out laughing. If they did not laugh at it, it would not be worthy of being called the Dao. Why is this so? The ancients once put it this way:

Those who understand the Dao keep their understanding to themselves and do not compete with the world to display it, so they seem dim. Those who cultivate the Dao keep moving forward without competing with the world to get ahead, so they seem to fall behind. The level great Dao accords with all things. Even though ordinary people cannot attain it, it appears much like what they know. People of profound De (Virtue/Power) do not claim to possess De; they are humble as a valley. What is truly white does not avoid filth to show its whiteness. It mingles with the world and seems stained. Vast De does not consider itself vast and often seems deficient. Those who establish De diligently cultivate their nature, yet deal with others simply, so they seem perfunctory and slack. Those who are genuine and unadorned follow nature freely and do not cling to fixed ways, so they seem changeable. Those who are truly upright are straight of heart, but act without self-consciousness or force, and so show no sharp edges.

A great vessel takes long to complete; its achievement cannot appear at once. The greatest sound is scarcely heard. The greatest image has no form that can contain it. How could people of middling or shallow understanding measure or grasp these truths? They naturally criticize and laugh at them. The essence of the Dao is subtle and hidden, impossible to name in words. When it appears among the myriad things, it is expressed in its capacity both to give and to bring things to completion. All things receive its gifts, though they may not recognize it. So it is hardly surprising that people of shallow understanding laugh at it.

The Dao gives rise to One; One gives rise to Two; Two gives rise to Three; and Three gives rise to the myriad things. All things carry Yin and embrace Yang, and the two Qi (vital energy) intermingle to form harmony. People dislike being called “orphan,” “widower,” or “one who lacks grain”—humble titles used by rulers—yet lords and kings use these names for themselves. Thus, at times, things are diminished and thereby gain; at other times, they are increased and thereby suffer loss. What others teach me, I teach in turn: the forceful and overbearing do not meet a good end. I will take this as the fundamental principle for teaching others.

“Dao gives rise to One; One gives rise to Two” describes the nameless and formless state, the beginning of Heaven, Earth, and all things. “Two gives rise to Three; Three gives rise to the myriad things” describes how all things are generated and come into manifestation. [At this point, the original continues from the preceding passage, restating the teaching that gain and loss work in opposite ways, along with the warning that the forceful and overbearing do not meet a good end.]

道生一一生二无名天地之始也二生三三生万物有名万物之母也万物皆负阴而抱阳冲气以为和孰非道之生之成之者乎人之所恶惟孤寡不谷而制名者使王公自以为称欲其贵而不忘贱高而不忘下也故物或损之而适以益或益之而反以损谦与满之所自招也古人之所以教人者我亦取其言为教有曰强梁者不得其死岂非自益而反大损者乎是言也吾将以为教人之主 此章冲气为和以上似承善贷且成而言与下假文义不属或有脱误不可知解者皆牵合耳 道谓理一谓气二谓阴与阳三谓阴与阳与阴阳会合之气即下文所云冲气也万物负阴而抱阳冲气为和即申说三生万物也不属或有脱误不可知解者皆牵合耳 道谓理一谓气二谓阴与阳三谓阴与阳与阴阳会合之气即下文所云冲气也万物负阴而抱阳冲气为和即申说三生万物也 此言生一生二与儒者不同此章惟李息斋注差明白可味 天下之至柔驰骋天下之至坚无有入于无间吾是以知无为之有益不言之教无为之益天下希及之 惟天下之至柔为能驰骋天下之至坚而役使之惟无有者为能入无间之内而无不达吾是以知无为之为有益也无为之为所谓至柔也无有也何所不驰何所不入乎然不言之教无为之益天下希及之矣盖叹其鲜能也
Interpretation

The Dao gives rise to “the One,” and the One gives rise to “the Two.” This means that the nameless Dao is the beginning of Heaven and Earth. The Two gives rise to “the Three,” and the Three gives rise to the myriad things. This means that the named Dao is the source of the myriad things. All things turn their backs on Yin and face Yang; only when the two Qi meet and harmonize do they form a state of harmony. What is there that is not generated and brought about by the Dao?

People dislike only the names “orphan,” “widower,” and “unworthy,” yet the ancients deliberately used them as titles, and even had rulers call themselves by them. They did so in the hope that rulers would not forget humility when honored, or modesty when in high positions. Thus, something may seem to suffer a loss but end up gaining; or seem to increase but end up suffering a loss. These are the respective consequences of humility and complacency. I, too, have taken the ancients’ teachings as instruction. They say, “The violent and overbearing often meet a violent death.” Does this not show that what one takes to be a gain can instead bring great loss? I will make this the foundation of my teaching.

The passage up to “the Qi of Yin and Yang harmonizes” in this chapter seems to continue the preceding idea of “being good at giving and bringing things to completion.” Yet it does not connect closely in meaning with what follows. Perhaps something has been omitted, though we cannot know for certain. Explanations that forcefully interpret the passage and insist on linking all its parts are merely far-fetched conjectures.

The “Dao” mentioned here is principle; “the One” is Qi; “the Two” are Yin and Yang; and “the Three” are Yin and Yang together with the Qi formed by their interaction—that is, the “blended Qi” mentioned below. “All things turn their backs on Yin and face Yang; the Qi of Yin and Yang harmonizes” further explains how “the Three gives rise to the myriad things.” This passage on “the One giving rise to the Two” differs from the Confucian account. Li Xizhai’s commentary is especially clear here and merits close consideration.

The softest thing under Heaven can control the hardest thing under Heaven. What has no form or substance can enter where there is no gap. From this I know that Wuwei is beneficial. To teach without words and bring benefit through Wuwei—few under Heaven can do this.

Only the softest thing under Heaven can control and make use of the hardest thing under Heaven. Only what has no form or substance can enter where there is no opening, and so reach everywhere. From this I know that Wuwei is beneficial. Like the supremely soft, like what has no form or substance, where could Wuwei not travel or enter? Yet few under Heaven can teach without words and bring benefit through Wuwei. Here the passage laments how rare it is for anyone to achieve this.

名与身孰亲身与货孰多得与亡孰病是故甚爱必大费多藏必厚亡知足不辱知止不殆可以长久 人之狥名者知有名而不知有身亦思名与身孰亲乎人之多藏必厚亡知足不辱知止不殆可以长久 人之狥名者知有名而不知有身亦思名与身孰亲乎人之贪货者知有货而不知有身亦思身与货孰多乎狥名贪货者皆知好得而病亡亦思得与亡孰病乎是故有所甚爱则求之者必力而有大费所藏者厚则攻之者必众而至厚亡至此而始悟名之为身累也货之为身贼也得之为病甚于亡也若夫君子能知足则不辱能知止则不殆斯乃可以长久耳 大成若缺其用不敝大盈若冲其用不穷大直若屈大巧若拙大辩若讷躁胜寒静胜热清静为天下正 道 大成若缺其用不敝大盈若冲其用不穷大直若屈大巧若拙大辩若讷躁胜寒静胜热清静为天下正 道德之大成者不自知其成也自视常若缺故其用不敝才能之大盈者不自以为盈也自视常若冲故其用不穷行之大直者循理而动不与物竞故若屈知之大巧者行所无事不为雕琢故若拙言之大辩者理有固然不以口争故若讷此清静之德也今夫寒热之气有形者之所不免而躁者可以胜寒静者可以胜热内之胜外如此岂有体清静之德而不为天下所取正者乎
Interpretation

Which is closer to a person: their reputation or their own life? Which matters more: life or possessions? Which brings greater distress: gaining or losing? Those who cherish something too dearly will surely pay dearly for it; those who hoard too much will surely suffer great loss. Know contentment, and you will not be disgraced; know where to stop, and you will not be endangered. In this way, you can endure.

Those who pursue reputation know only its importance, and not the value of their own lives. They should ask themselves: which is closer to them, their reputation or their own person?

Those who pursue reputation know only reputation and disregard themselves; those who covet possessions know only possessions and disregard themselves. They should ask themselves: which matters more, their own person or their possessions? Those who pursue reputation and covet possessions delight in gaining and fear losing. They should ask themselves: which brings greater distress, gaining or losing?

To cherish something too dearly is to pursue it relentlessly, and one will inevitably pay a great price for it. The more one accumulates, the more people will covet it, and the greater the loss in the end. Only then do people understand that reputation can become a burden on one’s person, possessions can become a source of trouble, and the distress brought by gain can sometimes be worse than that brought by loss. If a noble person knows contentment, they will not be disgraced; if they know when to stop, they will not be endangered. This is how one can endure.

What is most complete seems to have something lacking, yet its function never fails. What is most full seems empty, yet its function is inexhaustible. What is most straight seems crooked; what is most skillful seems clumsy; what is most eloquent seems inarticulate. Movement can dispel cold; stillness can overcome heat. Through clarity, stillness, and Wuwei (non-action), one becomes a model for all under Heaven.

The Dao (the Way).

One who truly attains completeness does not consider themselves complete, but often feels they still fall short; therefore, their function never fails. One whose abilities are truly abundant does not consider them abundant, but often feels they remain empty; therefore, their function is inexhaustible. One whose conduct is truly upright acts in accordance with what is right and does not contend with things, so they appear bent. One who is truly wise and skillful follows nature and does not deliberately embellish, so they appear clumsy. One who is truly eloquent understands that things are as they are, and does not rely on argument to prevail, so they appear inarticulate.

This is the virtue of clarity and stillness. Cold and heat are unavoidable for things with form; movement can ward off cold, and stillness can overcome heat. The inner state can prevail over external conditions. Given this, how could one who possesses the virtue of clarity and stillness fail to become a model honored by all under Heaven?

天下有道却走马以粪天下无道戎马生于郊罪莫胜寒静者可以胜热内之胜外如此岂有体清静之德而不为天下所取正者乎 天下有道却走马以粪天下无道戎马生于郊罪莫大于可欲祸莫大于不知足咎莫大于欲得故知足之足常足矣 天下有道无所事争却走马以粪田天下无道则日寻于争而戎马生于郊何以故罪莫大于可欲有可欲而以示人盗之招也祸莫大于不知足不知足而求益乱之所由生也咎莫大于欲得人之有欲得人之有大恶之所归也匹夫有此患必及之侯王而为此戎马所以生于郊乎故人能知其分之已足而自足焉则无不足矣无不足则不争矣 不出户知天下不窥牖见天道其出弥远其知弥少是以圣人不行而知不见而名不为而成
Interpretation

When the world is clear and peaceful and people follow the right way, they can retire their warhorses to plow and fertilize the fields. When the world is troubled and people turn away from the right way, warhorses breed in the suburbs, ready to be sent into battle at any moment. Here, “manure” means fertilizer for the fields. No fault is greater than stirring up greed; no calamity is more serious than not knowing when one has enough; no error is greater than always wanting more. So those who know enough and are content with enough can remain content.

When the Dao is followed throughout the world, there is no need for conflict, and people can retire their warhorses to plow and fertilize the fields. When the Dao is abandoned, people are caught up in conflict day after day, and warhorses breed in the suburbs. Why does this happen? No fault is greater than stirring up greed: displaying things that arouse people’s desire invites theft. No calamity is more serious than not knowing when one has enough: wanting to keep adding to what one already has brings disorder. No error is greater than wanting to possess more: constantly seeking to take what belongs to others eventually brings great calamity. When ordinary people act this way, disaster is bound to befall them; when lords and kings do so, war follows, and warhorses appear in the suburbs. So when people know their limits, recognize that they have enough, and are content with it, they do not feel deprived. Without a sense of deprivation, there is no struggle to possess more.

Without leaving the doorway, one can know the world. Without peering out the window, one can understand the way of Heaven. The farther one travels, the less one knows. Thus, the sage need not travel in person to gain understanding, need not see with their own eyes to comprehend things, and need not act forcefully to bring things to completion.

不出户可以知天下天下之为天下无待于出户而后知也不窥牖可以见天道天道之为天道固无待于窥牖而后见也若不知天下天道之所以然而求之于外出户而后知所知几何窥牖而后见所见几何即穷其所知所见以求牖可以见天道天道之为天道固无待于窥牖而后见也若不知天下天道之所以然而求之于外出户而后知所知几何窥牖而后见所见几何即穷其所知所见以求之其出弥远其知弥少矣是以圣人之知天下不自天下索知也圣人之见天道不自天道起见也知不在外见不在外故不待行以求之而后知也不待目见而后名也不行而已知不见而已名且不必有所作为而已成矣圣人体道之功用如此其至也 为学日益为道日损损之又损以至于无为无为而无不为矣故取天下常以无事及其有事不足成矣圣人体道之功用如此其至也 为学日益为道日损损之又损以至于无为无为而无不为矣故取天下常以无事及其有事不足以取天下 为学者以求知故欲其日益为道者在返本故欲其日损损之者无欲不去亦无理不忘损之又损以至于一无所为而后与道合体焉为道而至于无为则可以物付物泛应无方而无不为矣故古之圣人取天下而化之正之者常以无事及其有事则为者将败之执者将失之何足以取天下乎 无事即无为也取开元疏云犹摄化也
Interpretation

Without leaving the household, one can understand the world; there is no need to wait until one has stepped outside to learn what is happening in it. Without looking out through the window, one can discern the Dao—the patterns by which nature operates. The Dao need not wait to be revealed through a window. If one does not understand the underlying causes of the world and the Dao, but seeks only outside oneself, how much can one know after going out? And how much can one see by looking through a window? Even if one exhausts all that can be known and seen and then uses it to investigate the Dao, one will still grow ever more distant from it. The farther one goes, the less one knows.

Thus, the sage understands the world without searching for knowledge beyond it, and discerns the Dao without seeking insight outside it. Knowledge and understanding are not found outside; therefore, one need not travel in person to seek them in order to know, nor see with one’s own eyes in order to discern. The sage does not act recklessly, yet things are accomplished. This is the function of the sage embodying the Great Dao—the fundamental principle of the cosmos—at its highest level.

Those who pursue learning increase their knowledge day by day; those who cultivate the Dao reduce their desires and attachments day by day. Continue reducing them until there is Wuwei (non-action), and one can reach a state in which nothing remains undone. Therefore, in governing the world, one should always take having no affairs as the foundation. Once one deliberately creates too many affairs, one cannot fulfill the aim of governing the world. This, too, is the highest expression of the sage’s embodiment of the Great Dao.

Learning aims to increase knowledge, so it advances day by day. Cultivating the Dao aims to return to the root, so it diminishes day by day. To diminish is to remove desires and let go of rigid, unyielding views. Continue diminishing until there is no deliberate contrivance, and one will be in accord with the Dao. When cultivation of the Dao reaches Wuwei, one can follow the nature of all things, allowing each to follow its own course, responding flexibly and accomplishing everything.

Thus, the ancient sages governed and transformed the world precisely through having no affairs and practicing Wuwei. Deliberate action often brings ruin; insistently holding on often leads to loss. How, then, could one govern the world? Here, “taking the world” means governing and transforming it; “having no affairs” means Wuwei.

圣人无常心以百姓心为心善者吾善之不善者吾亦善之德善矣信者吾信之不信者吾亦信之德信矣圣人在天下惵惵为天下浑其心百姓皆注其耳目圣人皆孩之 圣人无常心惟以百姓之心为心而已百姓之心皆欲上之善之也皆欲上之信之也圣人于百姓之善者吾善遇之惵惵为天下浑其心百姓皆注其耳目圣人皆孩之 圣人无常心惟以百姓之心为心而已百姓之心皆欲上之善之也皆欲上之信之也圣人于百姓之善者吾善遇之即其不善者吾亦善遇之斯其德全乎善矣百姓之信者吾信待之即其不信者吾亦信待之斯其德全乎信矣圣人之在天下惵惵然恐天下之不相忘于善相忘于信故为天下浑同其心一以视之而无所异焉百姓方注其耳目互相伺察各有是非圣人皆孩之孩之者视若婴儿见其是者亦不喜见其非者亦不怒也圣人之无常心以百姓心为心者如此 惵惵恐惧也 出生入死生之徒十有三死之徒十有三人之生动之死地者亦十有三夫何故以其生生之厚盖闻也圣人之无常心以百姓心为心者如此 惵惵恐惧也 出生入死生之徒十有三死之徒十有三人之生动之死地者亦十有三夫何故以其生生之厚盖闻善摄生者陆行不遇兕虎入军不避甲兵兕无所投其角虎无所措其爪兵无所容其刃夫何故以其无死地
Interpretation

The sage has no fixed opinions but takes the people’s hearts as their own. The sage treats the good with kindness, and treats the not good with kindness too. In this way, De reaches true goodness. The sage trusts those who keep faith, and trusts those who do not keep faith as well. In this way, De reaches true trustworthiness.

Living among all under Heaven, the sage is always anxious, concerned that people may fail to treat one another with kindness and keep faith with one another. So the sage works to bring everyone’s hearts together as one, without making distinctions. People watch one another’s words and actions, scrutinize one another, and judge what is right and wrong. The sage, however, regards them all as children. To regard them as children means to treat them like infants: not to rejoice when they do something right, nor to become angry when they do something wrong. This is what it means for the sage to have no fixed opinions and to take the people’s hearts as their own. The word “die-die” describes a state of anxiety and apprehension.

People travel from birth toward death. Three in ten belong to the long-lived; three in ten die young. Another three in ten could have lived well, but head toward death because they act unwisely. Why is this? It is said to be because they cling too fiercely to life and pursue the cultivation of health to excess.

Those skilled at preserving life, when walking on land, do not encounter rhinoceroses or tigers; when entering a battlefield, they do not shy away from weapons. The rhinoceros has nowhere to use its horn, the tiger nowhere to sink its claws, and weapons nowhere to pierce. Why is this? Because such people do not place themselves in situations that bring death.

万物之变莫大乎生死苟出乎生即入乎死约计当世之人宜得生而为生之徒者十有其三宜得死而为死之徒者十有其三自以为之生实则动而之死地者亦十有其三夫方以为之生乃动之死地者何以故以其生生之厚也其奉生者愈厚则其趋死者愈迫故曰之生而适之死也要之皆非摄生之善者盖闻善摄生者陆行不其三夫方以为之生乃动之死地者何以故以其生生之厚也其奉生者愈厚则其趋死者愈迫故曰之生而适之死也要之皆非摄生之善者盖闻善摄生者陆行不遇虎兕入军不避甲兵兕无所投其角虎无所措其爪兵无所容其刃夫何故以其无死地也所谓死地者身是也不有其身方以生为寄而不之爱不爱其生孰能死之此所谓善摄生者也 诸解多以出谓自无而见于有入谓自有而归于无无死地谓本性常存 道生之德畜之物形之势成之是以万物莫不尊道而贵德道之尊德之贵夫莫之爵而常自然故道生之畜之长之育之亭之毒之养之覆之生而不有为而不恃长而不宰是谓玄德
Interpretation

Among all the changes in the world, none is greater than life and death. Emerging from the side of life means entering the side of death. Roughly speaking, among people alive today, about three in ten would naturally live out a long life; about three in ten are destined to die young; and another three in ten think they are pursuing survival, while their actions in fact lead them toward death.

Why do those who clearly want to go on living act in ways that bring them closer to death? Because they place too much value on life and pursue the art of nourishing it too fervently. The more they lavish care on their lives, the sooner they approach death. Thus, those who seek survival yet move toward death ultimately do not know how to preserve life.

It is said that those skilled at preserving life can walk on land without encountering tigers or rhinoceroses, and need not avoid armor and weapons in the ranks of an army. A rhinoceros finds nowhere to use its horn; a tiger, nowhere to strike with its claws; a weapon, nowhere to pierce. Why is this so? Because there is no vulnerable place where death can strike. What is meant by a “place of death” is taking the body as one’s most fundamental support. If one does not cling to the body, but regards life only as a temporary lodging, one will not cherish it excessively. If one does not cling to one’s own life, what could make one fear death? This is what is meant by being skilled at preserving life.

Many commentators explain “emerge” in this passage as appearing from nonbeing into being, and “enter” as returning from being to nonbeing. They interpret “there is no place of death” to mean that one’s original nature endures forever.

The Dao (the Way) generates the myriad things, and De (Virtue/Power) nurtures them. The myriad things thereby take shape and, relying on natural conditions, come to completion. Thus, nothing among them fails to revere the Dao and cherish De. The Dao is revered and De cherished not because anyone has bestowed rank upon them, but because this is simply their natural way.

The Dao generates and nurtures the myriad things, helping them grow, develop, mature, and reproduce, while nourishing and sheltering them. It gives life to things but does not claim them as its own; it acts but does not take pride in its achievements; it helps things grow but does not rule over them. This is called “Mysterious De,” the profound and natural power of virtue.

立于无物之先者道也此万物之所始故凡物皆道生之道运而为德阴阳之气是也万有之所资也故凡物皆德畜之气聚而有物而后有形可见故物其形之者此万物之所始故凡物皆道生之道运而为德阴阳之气是也万有之所资也故凡物皆德畜之气聚而有物而后有形可见故物其形之者也物既形矣此物之形与众物之形相交相取而为势而后物之体用以备故势其成之者也物之形形此道之所生德之所畜而已势之成成此道之所生德之所畜而已是以万物莫不尊道而贵德道之尊德之贵岂有待而然哉夫固莫之爵而常自然者也故道之于物生之畜之不已也而又长之育之亭之毒之养之覆之其为功于物如此然皆自然而然生之而不有也为之而不恃也长之而不宰也此岂可得而名可得而于物生之畜之不已也而又长之育之亭之毒之养之覆之其为功于物如此然皆自然而然生之而不有也为之而不恃也长之而不宰也此岂可得而名可得而测者乎 天下有始以为天下母既得其母以知其子既知其子复守其母没身不殆塞其兑闭其门终身不勤开其兑济其事终身不救见小曰明守柔曰强用其光复归其明无遗身殃是谓袭常
Interpretation

The Dao existed before the myriad things appeared and is their source, so all things arise from the Dao. As the Dao moves and transforms, it gives rise to De. Here, “De” refers to the Qi of Yin-Yang, through which all things come into being; thus all things are nourished by De. When Qi gathers, things take shape. Only once they have form can they be seen, so matter constitutes their physical form.

Once things have formed, their shapes interact with and affect one another, creating various relationships and configurations. In this way, their substance and function become complete. Thus, configurations bring things to completion. The physical form of things comes from the Dao’s generative power and De’s nourishment; their completion, too, comes from the Dao’s generative power and De’s nourishment.

For this reason, there is nothing among the myriad things that does not revere the Dao and cherish De. Is the Dao revered and De cherished because someone granted them this standing? No. They are so naturally, of themselves. The Dao continually brings all things into being and nourishes them. It also makes them grow, develop, mature, and reproduce, providing for and sheltering them. This is how the Dao acts upon all things, yet everything happens naturally: it gives life to and nourishes things without possessing them; it acts without relying on its own power; it helps things grow without ruling over them. How could these actions be named in words or measured by the mind?

All things under Heaven share a common source, which may be called the “Mother of All Under Heaven.” Knowing this source allows us to understand the things it brings forth. After understanding those things, we must still hold fast to the source; then we will not fall into danger throughout our lives. Block the openings of the senses and close the gates of desire, and you will not be worn out over a lifetime. Give free rein to the senses, pursue desires, and become caught up in affairs, and your life will be beyond saving. To perceive what is subtle is called clarity; to hold fast to gentleness is called strength. Use the wisdom of illumination, then return to inner clarity, leaving no calamity for yourself. This is called following the constant Dao.

天下有始以为天下母此人所当体而得之者也既得其母以知其子将无所不察无所不济然不可狥末而忘本也既知其子必复守其母斯可以没身不殆矣守母之道如何塞其之者也既得其母以知其子将无所不察无所不济然不可狥末而忘本也既知其子必复守其母斯可以没身不殆矣守母之道如何塞其兑闭其门终身不劳而功自成不然开其兑以求济其事将终身危殆而莫之救人可不知返而守母乎视之而不可见者小也能见此不可见是曰明守之而无可守者柔也能守此无可守是曰强用其外见之光复敛其光而归本然之明勿外驰不返以遗身殃是谓能服习常道而与之合一者也 此皆言体道之事曰始曰母皆指道言子万物也知小守柔即守母也小柔即遗身殃是谓能服习常道而与之合一者也 此皆言体道之事曰始曰母皆指道言子万物也知小守柔即守母也小柔即上篇希夷微之意形道妙之辞袭即中庸下袭水土之袭也 使我介然有知行于大道惟施是畏大道甚夷而民好径朝甚除田甚芜仓甚虚服文采带利剑厌饮食资货有余是谓盗竽非道哉
Interpretation

All things in heaven and earth have a source, the mother from which everything under heaven is born. People should understand and attain it. Once they grasp the root, they can know all the things that arise from it, and there is nothing they cannot see clearly or bring to completion. But they must not pursue the branches and forget the root. After coming to know the myriad things, they must return to the source and hold fast to it; then they will remain free from danger throughout their lives.

How can one hold fast to the source? By closing the openings of the senses and shutting the gates of desire. Then one need not toil throughout life, and things will come to completion of themselves. Otherwise, if one gives free rein to the senses and pursues desire in the hope of getting things done, one will remain in danger for life, beyond anyone’s power to save. How could people fail to understand that they should return to the source and hold fast to it?

To look at it and not see it is because it is minute. To perceive what cannot be seen is called “clarity.” To guard it and find nothing concrete to guard is because it is weak and yielding. To hold fast to this formless, traceless root is called “strength.” After using the light that shines outward, one must also draw it back and return to one’s original clarity, not letting the mind and spirit wander outward, so as to avoid bringing calamity upon oneself. This is called receiving and practicing the constant Dao, and becoming one with the Dao.

These words all describe the practice of embodying the Dao. “Beginning” and “mother” both refer to the Dao; “child” refers to the myriad things. Perceiving what is minute and holding to what is yielding mean holding fast to the source. “Minute” and “yielding” correspond to “subtle,” “indistinct,” and “faint” in the preceding chapter. “Receive” means to accept and follow, as in the Zhongyong’s phrase “below, it follows the nature of water and earth.”

If I have even a little knowledge, then, as I walk the great Dao, what I fear most is straying from it. The great Dao is broad and level, yet people prefer narrow paths. Court halls and palaces are lavishly adorned, while fields lie fallow and granaries stand empty. People wear fine clothes, carry sharp swords at their waists, overindulge in food and drink, and have wealth to spare. This is like thieves running rampant and encouraging thievery; it does not accord with the Dao.

使我介然有知行于大道亦无不可知不可行也惟夸张则必至失道是可畏耳大道甚夷本自易行而民每好径遂至背驰好径者何如视其朝甚除刑政繁矣视其田甚芜视其仓甚虚本业废矣乃服文采带利刃厌饮食资货有余宠赂章矣大奸作小盗随是谓盗之先唱如竽之唱众声也真非道也哉 善建者不拔善抱者不脱子孙祭祀不辍修之于身其德乃真修之于家其德乃余修之于乡其德乃长之先唱如竽之唱众声也真非道也哉 善建者不拔善抱者不脱子孙祭祀不辍修之于身其德乃真修之于家其德乃余修之于乡其德乃长修之于邦其德乃丰修之于天下其德乃普故以身观身以家观家以乡观乡以邦观邦以天下观天下吾何以知天下之然哉以此
Interpretation

If I have even a slight understanding of the Great Dao (the Way), then acting in accordance with it, there is in principle nothing I cannot do. What should truly concern us is boasting about ourselves and acting recklessly; in the end, these will make us lose the Dao.

The Great Dao is broad and level, and should be easy to follow, yet people often prefer shortcuts, only to drift farther and farther from it. What do these shortcuts look like? Look at the court: its palaces are built in great luxury, showing that punishments and decrees are numerous. Look at the fields: they lie neglected and untilled. Look at the granaries: they are completely empty, showing that farming, sericulture, and other essential occupations have been abandoned. Yet rulers wear fine clothes, carry sharp weapons, indulge in food and drink, amass great wealth, and openly accept bribes from their favorites. Great treachery and evil arise from this, and petty thieves follow in their wake. This is called leading the way for bandits and thieves, like the yu pipes sounding first and drawing every other instrument into the music. Can this really be a way that accords with the Dao?

Those skilled at establishing the roots cannot have their foundations uprooted; those skilled at holding fast do not let what they hold slip away. In this way, the ancestral sacrifices of their descendants can continue without interruption. When moral cultivation is put into practice in oneself, De (Virtue/Power) becomes genuine and firm; when put into practice in a family, De becomes abundant; when put into practice in a village, De continues to grow; when put into practice in a state, De becomes rich; when put into practice throughout the world, De can be widely enacted.

Thus, from oneself one can understand others; from one family, other families; from one village, other villages; from one state, other states; and from the world, one can observe the world. How do I know what is happening in the world? By these principles.

善建者其所建不可拔善抱者其所抱不可脱传之无穷至其子孙犹祭祀不辍也所谓善建善抱者善修其德而已修德者修之于身而身正其德乃真修之于家而家齐其德乃余修之于乡而乡服其化其德乃长修之于邦而邦顺其治其德乃善建善抱者善修其德而已修德者修之于身而身正其德乃真修之于家而家齐其德乃余修之于乡而乡服其化其德乃长修之于邦而邦顺其治其德乃丰修之于天下而天下各得其所其德乃普此其所以不拔不脱也何以知其德之修与否也以身观身以家观家以乡观乡以邦观邦以天下观天下而已吾何以知天下之然哉以此 观身数语未详 含德之厚比于赤子毒虫不螫猛兽不据攫鸟不搏骨弱筋柔而握固未知牝牡之合而■〈峻,血代山〉作精之至也终日号而不嗄和之至也知和曰常知常曰明益生曰祥心使气曰强物壮则老是谓不道不道早已
Interpretation

Those who are skilled at establishing things leave them unshaken; those who are skilled at holding on to things keep them from slipping away. This principle is passed down from generation to generation. Even when it reaches their descendants, they continue to make offerings to their ancestors.

To be skilled at establishing and holding on to things, in the end, means to be skilled at cultivating De (Virtue/Power). Cultivation of De begins with oneself: when one is upright, one’s De is genuine. When one puts De into practice within the family, the family lives in harmony and De has room to grow. When one puts it into practice in the community, the community accepts its teaching and De endures. When one puts it into practice in the state, the state is well governed and De becomes abundant. When one puts it into practice throughout the world, everyone finds their proper place and De circulates everywhere. This is why what is established cannot be uprooted, and what is held fast cannot slip away.

How can we tell whether De has been well cultivated? Observe oneself through oneself, the family through the family, the community through the community, the state through the state, and the world through the world—that is all. How do I know the condition of the world? By this principle. (The original text’s note says that the meaning of the lines beginning “Observe oneself” is unclear.)

Those with deep De are like newborn infants. Poisonous insects do not sting them; fierce beasts do not harm them; birds of prey do not attack them. Their bones are weak and their sinews soft, yet they can clench their fists tightly. Though they know nothing of sexual union, their genitals can become erect—this shows that their Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy) are abundant. An infant cries all day without becoming hoarse—this shows that its harmonious Qi is abundant. Knowing how to harmonize is called “constancy”; knowing constancy is called “clarity.” Deliberately trying to augment life instead brings misfortune. Using the will to control Qi is to force things. When things grow strong and flourish, they move toward old age; this is called being out of accord with the Dao (the Way). To be out of accord with the Dao is to meet an early end.

An infant’s erect genitals show that its Jing and Qi are abundant; crying all day without becoming hoarse shows that its harmonious Qi is abundant. Knowing how to harmonize is called “constancy”; knowing constancy is called “clarity.” Deliberately trying to augment life instead brings misfortune. Using the will to control Qi is to force things. When things grow strong and flourish, they move toward old age; this is called being out of accord with the Dao. To be out of accord with the Dao is to meet an early end.

而■〈峻,血代山〉作精之至也终日号而不嗄和之至也知和曰常知常曰明益生曰祥心使气曰强物壮则老是谓不道不道早已 含德之厚者至比于赤子为赤子者毒虫不螫猛兽不据攫鸟不搏皆厚德之应也骨弱筋柔而握固不知牝牡之合而■〈峻,血代山〉作其气精纯之至也终日号而不嗄心不动而气和之至也知此至和之理者是之谓知常道知此常道者是之谓至明知其和知其常而守之不失则含德之厚可比赤子矣不然不知生之不可益而欲益之是菑诊欲至之祥气好胜而心复使之是谓不能弱而失之强物至于壮则必老恃赤子矣不然不知生之不可益而欲益之是菑诊欲至之祥气好胜而心复使之是谓不能弱而失之强物至于壮则必老恃壮者是谓不道不道则早已与含德者不大殊哉 知者不言言者不知塞其兑闭其门挫其锐解其纷和其光同其尘是谓玄同不可得而亲不可得而疎不可得而利不可得而害不可得而贵不可得而贱故为天下贵
Interpretation

Someone with profound inner De can approach the state of an infant. Venomous creatures do not sting the infant, fierce beasts do not pounce on him, and birds of prey do not seize him. These are responses brought about by profound De. Though an infant’s bones are weak and his sinews soft, he can grasp things firmly. Though he knows nothing of sexual union, his sexual organ becomes erect: his Jing and Qi are pure and unified to the utmost. Though he cries all day, his voice does not grow hoarse: his mind is undisturbed and his breathing is harmonious to the utmost.

To understand this principle of perfect harmony is to understand the Constant Dao, the unchanging Way. To understand the Constant Dao is to possess true insight. Understand harmony, know the Constant Dao, and hold fast to it without letting it slip, and you will have profound De, like an infant. By contrast, if you do not understand that life cannot be increased through external force, yet insist on trying to augment it, disaster will follow. If you strive to win and show your strength, letting your mind command your body, you do not understand weakness and softness; instead, you fall into hardness. When things reach the height of their strength, they inevitably decline into old age. To rely on strength is to go against the Dao; to go against the Dao is to decay before one’s time. This is far removed from the state of profound inner De.

Those who understand the Dao do not say much; those who love to talk often do not understand it. Draw in the senses and close the gates of desire; blunt the sharp edges and untangle confusion; soften the light and merge with the dust of the world. This is called Mysterious Union (Xuántóng), becoming one with the deep and hidden Dao. One who attains Mysterious Union is neither drawn near nor held at a distance, neither tempted by profit nor harmed, neither exalted nor debased. Thus, that person becomes one whom all under Heaven honor.

知者不言言者不知知道者塞内出之兑闭外入之门挫已之锐解物之纷和已之光同世之尘是之谓忘物我混内外玄同于道者也亦安所恃言哉未能玄同者同乎此则异乎彼同乎始未必不异乎卒当其同也则亲之利之贵之及其异也则疎之害之贱之玄同之人无所为同也安有所谓异故不可得而亲亦不可得而疎不可得而利亦不可得而害不可得而贵亦不可得而贱故为天下之贱之玄同之人无所为同也安有所谓异故不可得而亲亦不可得而疎不可得而利亦不可得而害不可得而贵亦不可得而贱故为天下之至贵 以正治国以奇用兵以无事取天下吾何以知天下之然哉天下多忌讳而民弥贫民多利器国家滋昏人多技巧奇物滋起法令滋章盗贼多有故圣人云我无为而民自化我好静而民自正我无事而民自富我无欲而民自朴
Interpretation

Those who truly understand the Dao do not speak carelessly; those who are always debating often do not truly understand it. Those who understand the Dao restrain their inner desires, use their senses with care, blunt their sharpness, untangle confusion, dim their dazzling brilliance, and blend into the dust of everyday life. This is called forgetting the distinction between self and things, bringing the inner and outer into harmony, and resonating with “mysterious sameness”—merging completely with all things and returning to the Great Dao. What, then, could such a person cling to or rely upon in speech?

Those who have not yet attained mysterious sameness may agree with some things and disagree with others. Agreement at first does not guarantee agreement to the end. When they agree, they draw near, favor, and esteem; when they differ, they distance themselves, cause harm, and look down on one another. Those who have attained mysterious sameness do not deliberately seek agreement, and so there is no such thing as difference. Others cannot make them favored or shunned, benefited or harmed, honored or debased. For this very reason, they become the most honored people under Heaven.

Govern the state through the correct Way, meet war with unconventional strategies, and govern the world through Wuwei (non-action), without acting recklessly. How do I know the world will be this way? The more prohibitions there are, the poorer the people become; the more weapons among the people, the more disorder in the state; the more people prize clever techniques, the more ingenious devices appear; the more numerous the laws and decrees, the more thieves there are. Therefore, the sage says: “When I do not act recklessly, the people transform themselves naturally; when I cherish stillness, the people set themselves right naturally; when I do not meddle, the people grow prosperous naturally; when I have few desires, the people become simple and sincere naturally.”

为君者以正道治国以奇变用兵以无事取天下吾何以知天下之可以无事取哉尝观天下多忌讳则失业者众而民弥贫民多权谋则国家眩于是而滋昏人不务本业而多技巧则珍奇无益之物滋起多为法令以制人则盗贼因之而愈多有此皆为上者多事之所致也知多事之足以病天下则知无事之足以取天下矣故圣人云我无为而民自化我好静而民自正我无事而民自富我无欲而民之所致也知多事之足以病天下则知无事之足以取天下矣故圣人云我无为而民自化我好静而民自正我无事而民自富我无欲而民自朴盖言无事之足以取天下也 为化并读如讹或化读如归苏子由云利器权谋也 其政闷闷其民醇醇其政察察其民缺缺祸兮福所倚福兮祸所伏孰知其极其无正邪正复为奇善复为妖人之迷也其日固久矣是以圣人方而不割廉而不刿直而不肆光而不耀
Interpretation

A ruler should govern the state by the right way, direct warfare through stratagem and change, and win all under Heaven through stillness and Wuwei (non-action). How do I know that all under Heaven can be won through Wuwei? I have observed that the more prohibitions there are in the world, the more people lose their means of livelihood, and the poorer the people become. The more eagerly people pursue schemes and plots, the more chaotic the state becomes. When people neglect their proper work and instead pursue every kind of skill, rare and useless things become ever more plentiful. The more laws are made to restrain people, the more thieves there are. All this is caused by the many measures taken by those in power. Once we understand that excessive government harms the world, we also understand that Wuwei and fewer affairs are enough to win all under Heaven.

Thus the sage says: “When I practice Wuwei, the people transform themselves naturally. When I cherish stillness, the people set themselves right naturally. When I avoid meddling, the people grow prosperous naturally. When I have few desires, the people become simple and genuine naturally.” This means that Wuwei and fewer affairs are enough to win all under Heaven.

The commentary notes that “transform” may also be read as “become corrupted” or “return.” Su Ziyou holds that “sharp instruments” refers to schemes and plots.

When government orders are lenient and imprecise, the people are generous and sincere; when they are harsh and exacting, the people are distressed and deprived. Within calamity lies good fortune, and within good fortune calamity lies in wait. Who can know what they will ultimately become? Is there no constant standard? The right way may turn into the strange and unexpected, and goodness may become something uncanny. People have been confused by this for a long time. Therefore, the sage is square yet does not injure, sharp-edged yet does not wound, upright yet not overbearing, and bright yet does not dazzle.

为君者其政闷闷而广大欤则其民醇醇而知厚矣其政察察而烦苛欤则民缺缺而疎薄矣闷闷者若无得于民也而醇醇者应之其政闷闷而广大欤则其民醇醇而知厚矣其政察察而烦苛欤则民缺缺而疎薄矣闷闷者若无得于民也而醇醇者应之察察者若大得于民也而缺缺者应之人见为祸而已为福之所倚人见为福而已为祸之所伏孰有知其究竟者哉方人之为察察之政其独未尝以正耶久之而正者复为奇矣善者复为妖矣察察之害如此人之狃目前之小福而忽远祸者其日固已久矣是以圣人方而不割廉而不刿直而不肆光而不耀去察察而取闷闷也正而不至为邪善而不至为妖此道得也 奇邪也妖怪变也刿伤也割也 治人事天莫如啬夫惟啬是谓早服早服谓之重积德重积德则无不克无不克则莫知其极莫知其极可以有国有国之母可以长久是谓深根固柢长生久视之道【柢一作蒂】
Interpretation

When a ruler governs with leniency and generosity, the people become simple and sincere. When he governs with scrutiny and harsh attention to detail, the people lose their sincerity, and relationships grow distant and cold. Lenient, generous policies may seem to gain nothing from the people, yet the people respond with sincerity. Strict, exacting policies may seem to gain much from them, yet the people respond with distance and indifference.

What people regard as misfortune may be where good fortune rests; what they regard as good fortune may conceal misfortune. Who can know how things will turn out in the end? When people first put exacting policies into practice, did they not believe they were following the right way? With time, the right way can turn into deviance, and good deeds into strange distortions. This is the harm caused by scrutinizing governance. People have long been drawn to small, immediate benefits while overlooking distant troubles.

Thus, the sage is upright without injuring others, pure without wounding them, honest without being reckless, and bright without showing off. He abandons scrutiny and chooses generosity. In this way, what is right does not veer into deviance, and what is good does not become strange and distorted. This is attaining the Dao.

“Strange” refers to what is deviant, and “monstrous” to transformations that are uncanny. “Wounding” means causing harm; “cutting” also means to wound.

In governing the people and following the course of Heaven, nothing is better than restraint and moderation. Only through restraint and moderation can one prepare in advance; preparing in advance is called continually accumulating De. When De has been deeply accumulated, there is nothing one cannot undertake. When there is nothing one cannot undertake, one’s limits are difficult to fathom. When one’s limits are difficult to fathom, one can take on the responsibility of the state. Once the root of the state is in hand, the state can endure. This is called having deep roots and a firm foundation: the way to live long and preserve one’s vitality. Some editions write “stem” instead of “root.”

A later passage says again: “In governing the people, act through De, and there is nothing you cannot undertake. When there is nothing you cannot undertake, your limits are difficult to fathom. When your limits are difficult to fathom, you can take on the responsibility of the state. Once the root of the state is in hand, the state can endure. This is called having deep roots and a firm foundation: the way to live long and preserve one’s vitality.”

治人德则无不克无不克则莫知其极莫知其极可以有国有国之母可以长久是谓深根固柢长生久视之道【柢一作蒂】 治人者不欲烦事天者不欲费二者皆如啬啬者敛退虚静之意夫惟啬是不待祸患之形而早自服习于道也早自服习于道是重积德于已也重积德于已则于天下之事将无所不胜于事无所不胜则其德之量又莫知其所极德之量莫知其所极则可以有国矣其有国也乃有其抚育一国之本是有国之母也斯可以长久治安而无患矣是道也以之治生则深根固柢长生久视之道也故治人事知其所极则可以有国矣其有国也乃有其抚育一国之本是有国之母也斯可以长久治安而无患矣是道也以之治生则深根固柢长生久视之道也故治人事天皆莫如啬 韩非子曰众人之用神也躁躁则多费多费之谓侈圣人之用神也静静则少费少费之谓啬又曰知治人者其思虑静知事天者其孔窍虚思虑静故德不去孔窍虚则和气日入语皆可味 治大国若烹小鲜以道莅天下其鬼不神非其鬼不神其神不伤人非其神不伤人圣人亦不伤人夫两不相伤故德交归焉【焦氏云烹不当加火】
Interpretation

Governing the people should not make public affairs burdensome; serving the Way of Heaven should not exhaust the spirit. In both, one must practice “frugality”: drawing inward, holding back, and remaining empty and still. Only by understanding frugality can one begin cultivating the Great Way early, before calamity has shown itself. To cultivate the Great Way early is to accumulate one’s De (Virtue/Power) without cease. When De has grown deep and abundant, one can meet the affairs of the world without fail. When no affair can overcome one, the capacity of one’s De has no known limit. When De is so deep and vast that it cannot be measured, one can govern a state. Governing a state then establishes the root by which the whole state is nurtured and cared for; this is “having the mother of the state.” Govern by this principle, and stability will endure without calamity. Apply it to cultivating oneself and nourishing life, and one can put down roots as deep and firm as a tree, reaching the state of long life and enduring vitality. Thus, whether governing the people or serving the Way of Heaven, nothing is more important than frugality.

Han Feizi said, “Ordinary people, when they use their spirit, are easily agitated. Agitation causes great expenditure of spirit; great expenditure is extravagance. When sages use their spirit, they are calm and settled. Calmness brings little expenditure; little expenditure is ‘frugality.’” He also said, “Those who understand how to govern the people are quiet in their deliberations; those who understand how to serve the Way of Heaven keep their senses and mind’s openings empty and still. When deliberations are quiet, De does not drain away; when the mind’s openings are empty and still, harmonious, flowing Qi (vital energy) enters day by day.” These words are all worth reflecting on.

Governing a great state is like cooking a small fish. When the world is governed through the Dao (the Way), ghosts and spirits cannot exert their power. This does not mean that ghosts and spirits do not exist, but that their numinous powers cannot harm people. They do not harm people, and the sage does not harm them. When neither side harms the other, De gathers between them and returns to a single place. Jiao says, “The character ‘cook’ should not have the ‘fire’ radical added to it.”

治大国者不可以烦若烹小鲜之不可以挠治之以道而已人主诚能以道莅天下则其鬼寂然安于冥漠而不神非其鬼不神也其鬼虽神而不为厉以伤人若不神耳又非其神之自不伤人也圣人之治亦不伤人以和召和鬼不神也其鬼虽神而不为厉以伤人若不神耳又非其神之自不伤人也圣人之治亦不伤人以和召和故神不伤人耳圣人不伤人圣人之德为之也两不相伤而德交归于圣人焉 亦字当善读乃追原语两不相伤亦谓圣人与神俱不伤人非谓人神不相伤 大国者下流天下之交天下之牝牝常以静胜牡以静为下故大国以下小国则取小国小国而下大国则取大国故或下以取或下而取大国不过欲兼畜人小国不过欲入事人夫两者各得其所欲故大者宜为下
Interpretation

Governing a great state should not be like stirring and fussing over a small fish. It is enough to govern in accordance with the Dao (the Way). If a ruler can truly govern the world by following the Dao, then spirits and ghosts will quietly remain in the unseen realm, neither manifesting nor causing trouble. This does not mean they lack supernatural powers. Rather, even if they are spiritually potent, they will not turn into harms that injure people, and will seem as though they had never manifested. Nor is it that spirits and ghosts simply do not harm people on their own. It is that the sage governs the world without harming people, and harmony calls forth harmony. Thus, though spirits and ghosts possess numinous powers, they do not cause trouble or injure anyone.

The sage refrains from harming people because of the sage’s De (Virtue/Power). That neither the sage nor the spirits and ghosts cause harm is a De they share, and it belongs to the sage. The word “also” here must be read precisely: it looks back to the preceding text and explains that the sage and the spirits and ghosts each refrain from harming people. It does not mean that people and spirits and ghosts refrain from harming one another.

A great state is like the lower reaches of a river: it is where all under Heaven converges, and it is the feminine principle of the world. The feminine often overcomes the masculine through stillness, because through stillness it takes the lower position. When a great state humbles itself before a small state, it can win the small state’s allegiance; when a small state humbles itself before a great state, it can gain the great state’s acceptance. Thus some states take the lower position and win the allegiance of others, while others take the lower position and gain their acceptance. A great state seeks only to embrace and nourish others; a small state seeks only to enter under the great state’s protection. Both can achieve what they desire, so a great state should especially take the humble, lower position.

大国者小国之下流天下所交会之国即天下之牝也牝之为物常以静胜牡以静为下知牝之道则知大国之道矣故以大国而下小国则取小国之心而为其所归以小国而下大国则取大国之心而为其所畜或下以取人或下而取于人为牝之益大矣尝观大国之情不过欲兼畜人小国之情不过欲入事人今大国亦能下而以小国而下大国则取大国之心而为其所畜或下以取人或下而取于人为牝之益大矣尝观大国之情不过欲兼畜人小国之情不过欲入事人今大国亦能下而取小国小国亦能下而取大国两者各得其所欲矣故大者不可恃其大而宜为下也大者宜下况小者乎 道者万物之奥善人之宝不善人之所保美言可以市尊行可以加人人之不善何弃之有故立天子置三公虽有拱璧以先驷马不如坐进此道古之所以贵此道者何不曰求以得有罪以免耶故为天下贵
Interpretation

A great state is like the lower reaches of a river, where the waters of the realm converge; it is also like the female of the world. The female often overcomes the male through stillness, remaining soft and quiet in a low position. Those who understand the principle of the female also understand how a great state should act.

If a great state humbles itself before a small state, it can win the small state’s heart and draw it into allegiance. If a small state humbles itself before a great state, it too can win the great state’s heart and be welcomed. Thus, sometimes humility wins others over, and sometimes it brings acceptance from others. This is the benefit of being soft and still, and remaining in a low position.

Consider the aims of a great state: it wants, above all, to absorb and accommodate other states. A small state’s aim is simply to depend on and serve a great state. If a great state can now humble itself and welcome a small state, while the small state humbles itself and attaches itself to the great state, both can fulfill their aims. A great state, then, must not rely on its strength but should humble itself. If this is true of a great state, how much more so of a small one?

The Dao (the fundamental principle of nature’s workings) is the profound source on which all things depend. It is a treasure to the good and a means by which those who lack virtue can preserve themselves. Fine words can earn respect, and good conduct can influence others. Even if someone lacks virtue, on what grounds should they be cast aside?

Therefore, when enthroning the Son of Heaven and appointing the Three Dukes (high-ranking officials in ancient times), even if one is led by someone bearing a great jade disc, with a four-horse carriage following behind, this is not as good as sitting down and offering the Dao. Why did the ancients prize the Dao? Was it not because, by seeking it, one could obtain it, and even after committing a crime, rely on it to escape disaster? That is why the Dao is treasured throughout the world.

道者万物所藏以为安之奥善人治身治世之宝而不善人之所倚以自保也何以见其为不善人之所保人即不善苟有一言之美亦可以市于人一行之尊亦可以加人之上人之不善知悔而求道何至遽为人弃之有道为不善人之所保如此故天子所由立三公所由置亦以道在而人归之耳虽有拱璧以先驷马诚不如坐进此道之可贵也古之所以贵此道者何也不曰求以得有罪以免耶求以得此故天子所由立三公所由置亦以道在而人归之耳虽有拱璧以先驷马诚不如坐进此道之可贵也古之所以贵此道者何也不曰求以得有罪以免耶求以得故为善人之宝有罪以免故为不善人之所保而为天下贵也 为无为事无事味无味大小多少报怨以德图难于其易为大于其细天下难事必作于易天下大事必作于细是以圣人终不为大故能成其大夫轻诺必寡信多易必多难是以圣人犹难之故终无难矣
Interpretation

The Dao is the profound principle to which all things return and through which they find stability. It is a treasure for the good person who cultivates himself and governs the world, and a means of protection for the unworthy. Why can the unworthy also rely on the Dao? Even if someone has poor conduct, a single good thing they say may earn the world’s appreciation; a single deed worthy of respect may win people’s esteem. If an unworthy person recognizes their mistakes, repents, and turns to seek the Dao, how could people cast them aside at once? The Dao can even serve as a means for the unworthy to correct their faults and begin anew.

The Son of Heaven can be established and the Three Dukes (important ministers who assisted the ruler in ancient times) appointed because the Dao exists and people therefore follow them. Even offering precious jade discs carried before a four-horse chariot is not as valuable as sitting down and presenting the Dao to someone. Why did the ancients value the Dao so highly? Was it not because those who seek it can gain something, and even those who have committed offenses can use it to free themselves from blame? Those who seek the Dao gain from it, so it is a treasure for the good; those who have committed offenses can use it to correct their faults and begin anew, so it is also a means of protection for the unworthy. For this reason, all under Heaven honors the Dao.

Act with Wuwei (non-action), handle affairs with a mind free of fuss, and experience flavor without imposing one. Regard the great as small and the many as few; respond to resentment with De (Virtue/Power). Address difficulties by beginning where things are easy; accomplish great tasks by beginning with what is small. The difficult tasks under Heaven must begin with what is easy; the great undertakings under Heaven must arise from what is small. Thus the sage never deliberately undertakes great deeds, and for that very reason is able to accomplish them.

Those who promise too readily are seldom trustworthy; those who regard things as too easy often encounter more difficulties. The sage therefore approaches matters with care and fully weighs their difficulties. In the end, there is nothing they cannot resolve.

圣人所为者无为所事者无事所味者无味大视其小多视其少报怨以德图难于其方易为大于其方细盖以天下难事必起于易天下大事必起于细也是以圣人于者无味大视其小多视其少报怨以德图难于其方易为大于其方细盖以天下难事必起于易天下大事必起于细也是以圣人于天下之事终不待其大而后为之故能成其大若夫众人之轻诺者后必难复而寡信于事多见为易者后必多至于难是以圣人之于事犹难之故终皆可成而无难矣【焦氏云为营为也】 王纯甫云事所为之条件也味所谓之理趣也作起也 其安易持其未兆易谋其脆易判其微易散为之于未有治之于未乱合抱之木生于毫末九层之台起于累土千里之行始于足下为者败之执者失之是以圣人无为故无败无执故无失民之从事常于几成而败之慎终如台起于累土千里之行始于足下为者败之执者失之是以圣人无为故无败无执故无失民之从事常于几成而败之慎终如始则无败事是以圣人欲不欲不贵难得之货学不学复众人之所过以辅万物之自然而不敢为【焦氏从韩非本作恃今断从诸本】
Interpretation

The sage acts in accord with nature and does not impose actions of their own. In handling affairs, they do not interfere deliberately; in understanding how things work, they do not chase after superficial pleasures. They approach great matters by attending to what is small, and deal with many tasks by beginning with few. They resolve resentment through kindness and virtue, plan for difficulties while they are still easy to address, and act on great matters while they are still minute.

The difficult matters under Heaven must begin with what is easy; the great matters under Heaven must arise from what is minute. Thus the sage handles the affairs of the world without waiting for them to grow large before acting, and so is able to accomplish great things. Those who promise too readily often find it hard to keep their word, and so lack trustworthiness. Many people think a task is easy, only to encounter difficulties later. The sage considers the difficulty of a task from the outset, and so ultimately completes it without falling into trouble. [Jiao Shi says: “To act” means to manage or carry out. Wang Chunfu says: “Affairs” are what one intends to do, “flavor” is the principle and interest within them, and “arise” means to come into being.]

Things are easy to keep in order when they are stable, easy to plan for before signs appear, easy to break apart when they are fragile, and easy to disperse when they are minute. Therefore, deal with things before they happen and bring order to turmoil before it takes shape. A tree that takes several people to encircle grows from a tiny sprout; a nine-tiered tower is built from baskets of earth; a journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step beneath one’s feet.

Trying to act at all costs makes it easy to ruin things; insisting on holding on makes it easy to lose them. Therefore, the sage does not impose actions of their own and so avoids failure; they do not cling or force matters and so lose nothing. People often fail when they are close to success. If they take as much care at the end as they did at the beginning, they will not ruin what they have done.

Thus the sage seeks what ordinary people do not seek and does not prize goods that are hard to obtain. They learn what ordinary people do not learn and return to the principles that everyone else overlooks. In this way, they help the myriad things follow their own natural order, yet do not presume to interfere. [The version of the Han Feizi cited by Jiao Shi reads “rely on”; the wording here is judged to follow another version.]

天下之事方其安易持方其未兆易谋方其脆易破方其微易散故为之者亦于其未有而为之治之者亦于其未乱而治之乃为善于为善于治者耳试观合抱之木生于毫末九层之台起于累土千里之行始于足下何者不始于小而终于大乎可不为于未有治于未乱乎为之治之将如何亦因物之自然而已天下事有所作为者常败之有所固执者常失之圣人无为故无败无执故无失所以能为于未有治于未乱也凡事又不特始者宜慎也民之从事常于几成而败若能慎终如始则无败事矣是以圣人以不欲为欲故不贵难得之货以不学为学故复众人之所过凡以辅万物之自然而不敢为也是以圣人以下之从事常于几成而败若能慎终如始则无败事矣是以圣人以不欲为欲故不贵难得之货以不学为学故复众人之所过凡以辅万物之自然而不敢为也是以圣人以下数句与上文不相属岂错简欤 古之善为道者非以明民将以愚之民之难治以其智多故以智治国国之贼不以智治国国之福知此两者亦楷式能知楷式是谓玄德玄德深矣远矣与物反矣乃至于大顺
Interpretation

Matters under Heaven are easy to manage when circumstances are stable, and easy to plan for before any signs have appeared. Things that are still soft and weak are easy to break; things that are minute are easy to disperse. So action should begin before something has happened, and governance should begin before disorder has arisen. This is what it means to be skilled at acting and governing.

Consider a tree so large that it takes both arms to encircle: it grew from a tiny sprout. A nine-tiered tower was built from basket after basket of earth. A journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step beneath one’s feet. What does not begin small and eventually grow large? How, then, could one fail to act before something has happened and govern before disorder has arisen?

How should one act and govern? Simply by following the natural patterns of things. Those under Heaven who deliberately try to make things happen often ruin them; those who insist on holding fast often lose something. The sage practices Wuwei (non-action), not forcing matters according to personal will, and so does not ruin them. The sage has no attachments, and so loses nothing. This is why the sage can act before something has happened and govern before disorder has arisen.

Care is needed not only at the beginning of a task. People often fail just as they are about to finish. If they were as careful at the end as they were at the beginning, they would not spoil their work. Thus, the sage makes having no desires the object of desire, and does not prize rare and valuable goods. The sage makes not deliberately pursuing knowledge the object of learning, and leads everyone back to their original state, so they no longer repeat their mistakes. In all this, the sage assists the natural course of the myriad things and dares not act recklessly.

The lines beginning, “Therefore, the sage takes this as the point of departure…” do not connect with the meaning of the preceding passage. Perhaps they were displaced through an error in the order of the bamboo slips.

Those of old who were skilled in following the Dao did not seek to make the people clever and cunning, but sought to keep them simple and unspoiled. The people are difficult to govern because they have too many cunning schemes. Governing a state through cunning brings calamity to the state; governing without cunning brings good fortune. Understanding these two points is a guiding principle for governance. One who understands this principle is said to possess “Mysterious De” (profound and subtle Virtue). Mysterious De is deep and vast, seeming to go against ordinary reason, yet in the end it brings the greatest harmony.

古之善治道术者非以明民而使之智将以愚之使之去巧诈返淳朴也民之难治以其智之多耳我若以智治国则民亦将以智应之机诈愈深大乱将作是国之贼也惟安于无为而不以智治之则民亦将不识不知以顺吾治乃国之福也知此之为福彼之为贼则得治国之楷式是谓玄德玄德之为德深矣远矣且物方竞智而已独贱之与物情反虽与物反必如此乃上下和平至于大顺 江海所以能为百谷王者以其善下之故能为百谷玄德之为德深矣远矣且物方竞智而已独贱之与物情反虽与物反必如此乃上下和平至于大顺 江海所以能为百谷王者以其善下之故能为百谷王是以圣人欲上人以其言下之欲先人以其身后之是以处上而人不重处前而人不害是以天下乐推而不厌以其不争故天下莫能与之争 江海所以能为百谷王者以其善下之故能为百谷王是以圣人欲上人必以言下之欲先人必以身后之是以圣人处上而民不苦其重处前而民不忮害之不惟不重不害天下且乐推而不厌以其善下而不争故天下莫能与之争也 老氏疵处在此子由云圣人欲上人非欲先人也盖人下之后之其道不得不上且先耳增饰之词非其本旨诸文士解老佛书多类此
Interpretation

Those skilled in governing through the Dao in ancient times did not try to make the people clever and cunning. They sought instead to lessen their cleverness and deceit, and return them to simplicity. The people are difficult to govern because they have too much cleverness. If I govern the state through cleverness, the people will also use cleverness in response, and deceit will grow ever more deeply rooted, bringing serious unrest in its wake. This will become a calamity for the state. Only when one rests in Wuwei (non-action) and does not govern through cleverness will the people stop deliberately seeking knowledge and accept governance naturally. This is the state’s good fortune. To understand what is fortune and what is calamity is to grasp the principles of governing. This is called “profound De” (deep and subtle Virtue). Profound De is deep and enduring. While everyone in the world competes to show off their cleverness, only the sage regards cleverness lightly. This goes against ordinary human conventions; but even though it runs counter to them, it must be so, in order to bring harmony between those above and below and reach a state of great accord.

The rivers and seas can become sovereigns of the hundred streams because they are adept at staying low, so all the streams flow toward them. If the sage wishes to stand above the people, he must be humble in his words; if he wishes to go before them, he must place himself behind them. Thus, though the sage occupies a high position, the people do not feel burdened by him; though he stands before them, the people do not harm him. People throughout the world are glad to raise him up and do not grow tired of him. Precisely because he does not contend, no one in the world can contend with him.

The rivers and seas are adept at staying low, and so become sovereigns of the hundred streams. If the sage wishes to stand above the people, he must first be humble in his words; if he wishes to go before them, he must first place himself behind them. Thus, when the sage is above, the people do not feel oppressed by him; when he is before them, they do not resent or harm him. Not only does no one feel oppressed or harmed, but people throughout the world are glad to raise him up and do not grow tired of him. Because he is adept at staying low and does not contend with others, no one in the world can contend with him.

This passage points out that Laozi’s original intent is that the sage is humble and takes a step back, and so naturally comes to stand above and before others. It does not mean that the sage actively wishes to stand above the people or go before them. Su Zhe (courtesy name Ziyou) also held that “wishing to be above others” and “wishing to be ahead of others” are merely embellishments. Later scholars often introduced embellishments of this kind when interpreting the Laozi or Buddhist scriptures.

天下皆谓我道大似不肖夫惟大故似不肖若肖久矣其细也夫我有三宝宝而持之一曰慈二曰俭三曰不敢为天下先夫慈故能勇俭故能广不敢为肖若肖久矣其细也夫我有三宝宝而持之一曰慈二曰俭三曰不敢为天下先夫慈故能勇俭故能广不敢为天下先故能成器长今舍其慈且勇舍其俭且广舍其后且先死矣夫慈以战则胜以守则固天将救之以慈卫之 天下皆谓我之道则大矣其人则似一无所能而不肖者夫惟大故似不肖若有所能而肖久矣其细也夫我有三宝常宝而持之三宝者一曰慈二曰俭三曰不敢为天下先此天下所谓不肖者也夫慈则为人致福除祸行之不疑故能勇俭则积贮有余致用必裕故能广不敢为天下先则与物无忮人所乐推故能为材用之长三宝之为益于天下者如此今使舍其慈而徒为勇舍其俭而好为广舍其后而乐居先是人之所恶也有死道矣较之知所宝者益于天下者如此今使舍其慈而徒为勇舍其俭而好为广舍其后而乐居先是人之所恶也有死道矣较之知所宝者何如乎试以慈之效言之夫为上者尽慈之道则百姓亲附各出死力以卫其上以战则胜以守则固是天之将救是人也故开其心使之以慈得众而卫之也人知是人之以慈卫人也不知实天之欲救是人而以慈卫之也则世之残民以逞者其天之所绝乎
Interpretation

Everyone in the world says that my Dao is vast, yet those who put it into practice seem out of step with ordinary ways, as if they have no particular ability. Precisely because the Dao is vast, it does not look like any specific skill; if it showed itself as some conspicuous talent, it would long since have seemed narrow.

I have three treasures, which I have always cherished and held fast: the first is compassion, the second is frugality, and the third is not daring to put myself ahead of everyone under Heaven. These are precisely the practices that people may regard as “unworthy.” Because compassion can bring people well-being and dispel calamity, it gives one courage. Because frugality allows one to build up ample reserves and have enough to spend, it enables one to give generously. Because one does not contend to be first or compete with the myriad things, people are glad to recommend such a person, who can therefore become a leader whom everyone follows.

Today, if one casts aside compassion and seeks only to display courage; casts aside frugality and seeks only extravagance; or casts aside yielding and devotes oneself to being first, one will invite resentment, head toward danger, and may even lose one’s life. Compared with those who know how to cherish these three treasures, what benefit could such conduct bring to the world?

Take compassion as an example. If those in high positions fulfill their responsibility to act with compassion, the people will draw near and rally to them, willing to do their utmost to protect them. Used in battle, this brings victory; used in defense, it brings security. The saying, “When Heaven is going to save someone, it protects them with compassion,” means that when Heaven intends to help a person, it leads them to practice compassion, so that they gain the people’s support and protection. People see only that this person protects everyone through compassion; they do not realize that Heaven is using compassion to protect them. Those who harm the people and seek only to satisfy their own desires are probably the very ones whom Heaven has abandoned.

善为士者不武善战者不怒善胜敌者不争善用人者为之下是谓不争之德是谓用人之力是谓配天古之极 善为士者不尚勇武善战者恬淡而不怒善胜敌者不与之争善用人者身为之下有此善者是谓不争之德是谓能用人之力是谓能配合乎天之道此自古之极则也 用兵有言吾不敢为主而为客不敢进寸而退尺是谓者不与之争善用人者身为之下有此善者是谓不争之德是谓能用人之力是谓能配合乎天之道此自古之极则也 用兵有言吾不敢为主而为客不敢进寸而退尺是谓行无行攘无臂扔无敌执无兵祸莫大于轻敌轻敌几丧吾宝故抗兵相加哀者胜矣 用兵者有言吾不敢为造兵端之主但后起应敌而为客吾不敢进寸而争人之有宁退尺而守巳之分是用兵而存不用之心若无行陈之可行无臂之可攘无敌之可扔无兵之可执也存心如此安有用兵之咎乎夫国家之祸莫大于轻敌轻敌几于自丧其宝故两国抗兵相加惟哀人之死而不乐杀者斯胜矣 吾言甚易知甚易行天下莫能知莫能行言有宗事有君夫惟无知是以不我知也知我者希则我贵矣是以圣人被褐懐玉 吾言甚易知甚易行天下莫能知莫能行者何也言有其宗事有其君知其宗与君而后谓之知而后可见之行夫惟不知言之宗事之君是以者希则我贵矣是以圣人被褐懐玉
Interpretation

A skillful general does not prize martial valor. A skillful warrior remains calm and is not quick to anger. One who is skillful at defeating an enemy does not struggle with them for dominance. One who is skillful at employing others can place himself below them and show them respect. This is the virtue of non-contention: a way of drawing on the strength of others. It accords with the Dao (the Way) and has been the highest guiding principle since ancient times.

A saying among military strategists goes: “I dare not take the initiative in attack, but instead respond to the other side; I dare not advance an inch, but would rather retreat a foot.” This is not contending for superiority. One who is skillful at employing others places himself below them. With these qualities, one can draw on the strength of others without contending. This accords with the Dao and has been the highest guiding principle since ancient times.

Military strategists also say: “I dare not initiate hostilities, but take the position of responding after the other side has acted; I dare not advance an inch, but would rather retreat a foot.” This is called moving as though there were no ranks to form, raising one’s arms as though there were no arms to raise, meeting an attack as though there were no enemy to face, and taking up weapons as though there were no weapons to wield. No calamity is greater than underestimating the enemy; doing so nearly costs one what is most precious. Therefore, when two armies clash, the side that grieves and feels compassion for the dead and wounded will prevail.

When military strategists say, “I dare not initiate hostilities, but take the position of responding,” they mean that one should not start a war, but wait for the other side to act first and then respond. “I dare not advance an inch, but would rather retreat a foot” means not seizing another’s territory, but yielding ground and keeping to one’s proper place. Even when caught up in warfare, one should still hold in one’s heart the wish not to use force. With this attitude, it is as though there were no ranks to form, no arms to raise, no enemy to face, and no weapons to wield. How could such a person incur the faults of warfare? A state’s greatest calamity is to underestimate its enemy. To do so is almost like destroying one’s own treasure with one’s own hands. Therefore, when two states go to war, only the side that grieves for the dead and wounded and takes no pleasure in killing can prevail.

My words are easy to understand and easy to put into practice, yet no one under Heaven understands or practices them. Why is this? Words have their roots, and actions have their governing principle. Only by understanding the roots of words and the guiding purpose of actions can one truly understand and put them into practice. Because people do not understand these roots and purposes, they do not understand me. Few understand me, and that is why I am held in high regard. Thus the sage wears coarse cloth on the outside, while keeping jade within.

吾言甚易知甚易行天下莫能知莫能行者何也言有其宗事有其君知其宗与君而后谓之知而后可见之行夫惟不知言之宗事之君是以虽闻吾言而终不我知也知我者希此在我者之所以可贵也是以圣人被褐懐玉岂人之所及知乎 知不知上不知知病夫惟病病是以不病圣人之不病也以其病病是以不病 知而不自以为知者上也不知而自以为知者病也夫惟病其病者是以不陷于病圣人所以无强知之病者以其深病此病是以不至于病也 民不畏威则大威至矣以为知者上也不知而自以为知者病也夫惟病其病者是以不陷于病圣人所以无强知之病者以其深病此病是以不至于病也 民不畏威则大威至矣无狭其所居无厌其所生夫惟不厌是以不厌是以圣人自知不自见自爱不自贵故去彼取此
Interpretation

My words are easy to understand and easy to put into practice, yet no one under Heaven can truly understand or carry them out. Why is this? Speech has its roots, and action has its guiding principle. Only those who understand the roots of speech and the principles that guide action can truly grasp them and put the Dao into practice. Because people do not understand these roots and principles, they still fail to understand me, even after hearing my words. Few understand me; this shows how precious the Dao I uphold is. Thus the sage wears coarse cloth while keeping jade hidden in his breast. How many can see this inner worth?

One who truly understands knows there are still things they do not know. To think oneself all-knowing is a failing. Only by recognizing this failing as a failing can one avoid being troubled by it. The sage is free of this failing precisely because he knows it well and remains wary of it; therefore, it does him no harm.

To know without thinking oneself knowledgeable is great skill. To be ignorant yet think oneself knowledgeable is a failing. Only by recognizing this failing as a failing can one avoid falling into it. The sage has no habit of feigning wisdom and thinking himself all-knowing because he is deeply wary of this failing; therefore, it does not trouble him.

When the people no longer fear authority, true calamity is at hand. Do not make your dwelling too cramped, and do not grow weary of the life on which you depend. Only by not growing weary of it can you avoid becoming weary of it. Thus the sage knows himself but does not put himself on display; he cherishes himself but does not exalt himself. He lets go of the latter and chooses the former.

民不畏刑威则必犯法而大威至矣民之所以不畏威者由于狭其所居而志于大厌其所生而志在多故陷死亡而不恤耳人各有分慎无狭其所居之位也慎无厌其所生之资也夫民心何常在上之所导耳惟为上者先不厌其所生是以民亦不厌其所生使上好侈大乐富厚民志何由定乎是以圣人自知而生之资也夫民心何常在上之所导耳惟为上者先不厌其所生是以民亦不厌其所生使上好侈大乐富厚民志何由定乎是以圣人自知而已不自见以夸人自爱而已不自贵以上人故去彼厌常竞新之习而取此清静也 勇于敢则杀勇于不敢则活此两者或利或害天之所恶孰知其故是以圣人犹难之天之道不争而善胜不言而善应不招而自来繟然而善谋天网恢恢疎而不失 人有用刚使气而勇于敢者则必致杀人有用柔能退而勇于不敢者则可全活此两者或利或害人皆知其不同也勇于敢于敢者则必致杀人有用柔能退而勇于不敢者则可全活此两者或利或害人皆知其不同也勇于敢为天之所恶孰知其致杀之故在此乎是以勇敢之事虽在圣人犹难之诚知其为天之所恶耳天之道未尝与人争也而卒之无所不胜未尝言也而善与人事相应不待呼召也而自来格于日用之间繟然舒缓若与人忘也而善为万物谋其成毁降祥降殃天之法网恢恢然大矣虽若疎廓而未尝遗失天道之可畏如此一犯其所恶何以自免乎
Interpretation

If the people no longer fear the force of punishment, they will inevitably break the law and ultimately bring upon themselves even harsher penalties. They do not fear that force because they feel their circumstances are too restrictive while single-mindedly pursuing a better life. They despise the livelihood they have and covet more, until they are willing to risk death without a second thought. Everyone has limits and should be prudent: do not regard your present standing as too low, and do not despise the means of life you already have.

The people’s hearts are not fixed; those in power guide them. When rulers do not despise the lives they already have, the people will not despise theirs either. If those above delight in luxury and crave abundance, how can the people’s aspirations be settled? The sage knows himself but does not flaunt himself to impress others; he cherishes himself but does not exalt himself above others. Thus he lets go of the habit of rejecting the ordinary way and chasing novelty, and chooses a life of quietude.

Forcing one’s way forward and daring to act recklessly often brings a fatal disaster. Yielding gently, stepping back, and taking care not to act rashly can preserve one’s life. These two approaches have different consequences: one brings benefit, the other harm. Daring to act recklessly is what Heaven’s Way abhors, but who truly understands why it brings disaster? So even when the sage faces forceful, reckless conduct, he treats it with caution.

Heaven’s Way does not contend with others, yet excels at overcoming; it does not speak, yet responds well. Nothing needs to summon it: things come of themselves. It proceeds calmly and at ease, yet skillfully provides for all things. Heaven’s net is vast and boundless; though its mesh seems wide, nothing slips through. The mysterious original uses the image of “Heaven’s net” to explain the cause and consequence, and the retribution, of Heaven’s Way: if people engage in conduct that Heaven’s Way abhors, how could they possibly escape?

民常不畏死奈何以死惧之若使人常畏死而为奇者吾得执而杀之孰敢常有司杀者杀夫代司杀者杀是代大匠斫夫代大匠斫者希有不伤手矣【一民下奇者吾得执而杀之孰敢常有司杀者杀夫代司杀者杀是代大匠斫夫代大匠斫者希有不伤手矣【一民下无常字人常作民常】 民之情本不畏死为民上者奈何以死惧之若使人常畏死为奇者吾得执而杀之孰敢复为奇者乎惟杀之而不止因知民之未尝畏死也则人恃刑以为治者亦可以返矣且民之有罪常有司杀者杀之若任一人之喜怒而杀人是代司杀者杀如人代大匠斫也代大匠斫希有不伤手者矣司杀者法也圣人立法本乎天讨不可以私意轻重其间为废法任情者警也 民之饥以其上食税之多也是以饥民之难治以其上之有为也是以难治民之轻死以其求生之厚也是以轻死夫惟无以生为者是贤于贵生 民之饥以其上食税之多也食税多而民力竭是以饥民之难治以其上之有为也有为而民智繁是以难治民贵生 民之饥以其上食税之多也食税多而民力竭是以饥民之难治以其上之有为也有为而民智繁是以难治民之轻死以其求生之厚也求生厚而贪无厌是以轻死夫惟无以生为者在上则不多取多事以病其下在下则不敢扞网为奸以累其上是贤于贵其生矣
Interpretation

Ordinary people often do not fear death. Why, then, do rulers use the death penalty to frighten them? If the people were always afraid of death, then whenever I seized and executed those who caused disorder, who would dare to continue causing trouble? Yet if killing goes on without end, that shows the people do not truly fear death. Those who govern the people through punishment should reflect on this.

Moreover, when the people commit offenses, those charged with administering punishments and executions can deal with them according to the law. If someone kills out of personal anger or favor, he is acting in place of the one entrusted with administering executions. This is like taking the place of a skilled carpenter and chopping wood: few who wield an axe in a carpenter’s stead can avoid injuring their hands. Here, “the one who administers executions” refers to those legally entrusted with carrying out punishments. A sage’s laws should accord with the order of Heaven; punishments must not be made harsher or lighter at will, according to private intent. The scripture uses this to warn people against abandoning legal standards and acting arbitrarily.

The people go hungry because rulers levy excessive taxes; that is why they suffer hunger. The people are difficult to govern because rulers issue too many edicts and force too many measures upon them; that is why society cannot be brought to peace. The people take death lightly because they pursue the comforts of life too intensely and crave too much; as a result, they are not afraid to die. Only those who do not make the pursuit of survival and comfort their foremost concern can surpass those who value comfort above all else.

The people go hungry because rulers tax them too heavily, draining their strength. They are difficult to govern because rulers issue too many edicts, leaving their minds unsettled and confused. The people take death lightly because they pursue an abundant life too intensely and their cravings know no limit; as a result, they are not afraid to die. Only those who are not attached to the pursuit of comfort can surpass those who value it too highly. If rulers are not attached to it, they will not levy excessive taxes or add unnecessary government business to burden the people. If the people are not attached to it, they will not dare break the law or commit wrongful acts that bring trouble upon their rulers.

人之生也柔弱其死也坚强草木之生也柔脆其死也枯槁故坚强者死之徒柔弱者生之徒是以兵强则不胜木强则共强大处下柔弱处上 人之生也柔弱及其死也
Interpretation

While alive, the human body is soft; after death, it becomes stiff. When plants and trees grow, they are tender and fragile; once they wither and die, they become dry and hard. Thus hardness and strength belong to death, while softness and gentleness belong to life. An army that relies on force finds it harder to win, and trees that are too rigid are easily broken. The strong should take the lower position; the weak, by contrast, can rise above.

While alive, the human body is soft; after death, it becomes stiff. When plants and trees grow, they are tender; once they wither and die, they become dry.

则坚强草

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback