中文 · EN

《茅山誌》Vol. 1

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongzhen 洞真部 Vol. 1 / 33 4,396 characters

About this page. The original text of 《茅山誌》 Vol. 1 (Dongzhen 洞真部, 33 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 9 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《茅山誌》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

茅山志卷之一     上清嗣宗師劉大彬造  誥副墨 漢詔誥    天皇太帝授茅君九錫玉册文(漢哀/帝元)    (壽二年太歲庚申/八月十八日己酉) 惟盈虛挺遠朗幽耽妙玄爰自童蒙散髪北 山靜心林澤積思求神登峻履谷艱尋師門 擲形絶崿投軀萬津丹誠率往肆其天然遂 造明匠廼受靈篇翦髮祝跪殘首截身帶索 自樂不恥飢寒所適惟道所保以眞情昭上 帝感激太玄今敬授盈位爲太元眞人領東 嶽上卿司命神君 君平心格正秉操金石丹心矯衆棲神高暎 今故報以玉鉞緑旌八威之策使征伐邪源 折衝萬神(其/一)君寒凍林谷味玄仰眞思激窮 岫啓心精誠今故報心紫髦之節藕敷華冠 使君招驅千靈封山召雲(其/二)君棄家獨往離 親樂仙契闊嶮試冬袒山川今故報以繡羽 紫帔丹青飛裙使君從容霄階携命玉眞(其/三) 君步驟林藪足履危仞心耽志尚曾不愆憚 今故報以班龍之輿素虎之軿使以浮宴太 空飛輪帝庭(其/四)君披榛併景寒露霜雪心求 明眞不戰不慄今故報以曲晨寳蓋瓊闈緑 室使君游盼九宫靜神温密(其/五)君遠遁秀榮 無疲於心潛形幽嶽精思萬林今故報以執 神流火䨥珠月明可以上聞太極通音上清 (其/六)君貞心高靜淫累不經素挺皓暎内外垣
Interpretation

This passage records an imperial edict from the Han dynasty conferring exalted titles upon Lord Mao (Mao Ying, a key patriarch of the Shangqing Daoist tradition). Structured in six parallel couplets following the pattern "For your... We now reward with...", the edict commends Lord Mao's spiritual achievements and bestows corresponding ritual implements:

From youth, Mao Ying practiced asceticism in the northern mountains, willingly enduring hunger and cold—cutting his hair, fasting, and wearing coarse hemp ropes while single-mindedly pursuing the Dao (the Way). Crossing mountains and rivers to seek enlightened masters, he ultimately obtained authentic Daoist transmission. Moved by his utmost sincerity, the Celestial Emperor conferred upon him the title "Perfected Being of the Great Origin" (Taiyuan Zhenren) and appointed him "Divine Lord of the Eastern Peak and Director of Destinies" (Dongyue Shangqing Siming Shenjun), a position governing the sacred mountains of the east and human lifespans.

The Celestial Emperor bestowed six treasures in succession: First, a jade battle-axe and green banner, granting him authority to subdue demons and command ten thousand spirits. Second, a violet yak-tail staff and ornate crown, enabling him to summon countless numinous beings and control mountain mists. Third, an embroidered feathered cape and vermilion flying skirt, assisting his unimpeded travel between celestial realms. Fourth, a dragon chariot and tiger carriage for soaring through the void to reach the heavenly courts. Fifth, a curved-canopy jeweled parasol and jade pavilion with emerald chambers for meditation within the nine-layered celestial palaces. Sixth, twin flaming pearls and a luminous moon pearl granting direct access to the highest Shangqing (Upper Clarity) realm and communion with supreme deities.

Each treasure corresponds to specific stages of Lord Mao's cultivation: enduring bitter frost, renouncing familial ties, and perilous quests for the Dao. These honors simultaneously affirm his "pure heart and lofty serenity" and symbolize the supernatural powers attained at the pinnacle of spiritual realization. The "nine bestowals" (jiuxi)—historically the highest imperial honors for meritorious officials—are here adapted into a Daoist framework as celestial rewards for perfected beings.

平今故報以錦旌繡旛白羽玄竿可以呼召 六陰玉女侍軒其七君慈向物陰德萬生蠢 動之毛皆念經營今故報以鳳鸞之嘯金鐘 玉磬可以和神虚館樂眞儛靈(其/八)君飢渴養 神艱辛求眞萬物不能致其惑千邪不能毁 其淳今故報以紫琳之腴玉漿金罌可以壽 同三光刻簡丹璚(其/九)君標領清玄紫緯八暎 心暉重離神躍太霞實眞人之長者故以太 元爲號九德既備積感太微天人虛因不期 同歸今酬九事以報往懷君心神方朗四靈 所棲丹眞啓焕秉直不回正任全固鑒無照 微今屈宰上卿總括東嶽又加司命之主以 領録圖籍給玉童玉女各四十人以出入太 微受事太極也治宫赤城玉洞之府盈其蒞 之動靜以聞    太上遣齎紫素之書策中君文曰(永/始)    (三年歲/在丁未) 太上有命天眞書言咸陽茅固家于南關厥 字季偉受名當仙位爲定録兼統地眞使保 舉有道年命相關勤恭所蒞四極法全宫館 洞臺治丹陽句曲之山固其朂之動靜察聞    紫素策小君文曰 盈固弟衷挺素該清雖晩反正思微徹誠斷 馘六天才穎標明今屈司三官保命建名總 括岱宗領死記生位爲地仙九宫之英勸教 童蒙開導方成教訓女官授諸妙靈治法百 鬼典崇校精關察水源江河流傾封掌金谷
Interpretation

The Records of Mount Mao document the investiture rituals within the Daoist celestial hierarchy, primarily describing how the three Mao brothers—Mao Gu, Mao Ying, and Mao Zhong (later revered as the "Three Mao Perfected Lords")—received their immortal appointments.

The first section details the celestial rewards bestowed upon deities: brocade banners and feathered insignias with white plumes and black shafts could summon the Six Yin Jade Maidens (female divine beings) as attendants; the immortal music of phoenix calls, golden bells, and jade chimes harmonized the spirit (Shen); while feasts of purple fairy fruits and jade nectar in golden cups granted longevity equal to the Three Luminaries (sun, moon, and stars). These honors corresponded to the deities' merits in universal salvation and steadfast cultivation.

The second section specifically records the Mao brothers' appointments: The Supreme Elder Lord (Taishang Laojun, Daoism's highest deity) dispatched emissaries bearing violet-silk edicts (celestial decrees) to proclaim their offices. The eldest brother, Mao Gu (courtesy name Jiwei), was titled "Lord of Stabilized Records," governing terrestrial immortals (Dixian) from his seat at Mount Juqu in Danyang (present-day Mount Mao), where he oversaw human morality. The youngest brother, Mao Zhong (courtesy name Siwei), received the title "Flower of the Nine Palaces of Earthly Immortals," administering the Three Offices (Heavenly, Earthly, and Water Officials). His duties included instructing novice Daoists, supervising female cultivators, and regulating natural resources like river systems and precious metal deposits.

The text mentions the "Director of Destinies" (Siming), a divinity overseeing lifespans; "Jade Youths and Maidens" as celestial attendants; and "Taiwei" and "Taiji" (Supreme Ultimate) as heavenly palace names. These appointments reflect the Daoist concept of "heaven-human resonance," where cultivators' virtuous deeds (De) are recognized by the celestial court and rewarded with corresponding divine authority.

藏録玉漿監植龍芝洞草夜光治良常之山 帶北洞之口鎮陰宫之門衷其勉之動靜以 聞  右文梁普通三年刻石華陽南洞九錫碑  見聞金石篇 齊梁詔誥(表奏/附)    齊武帝答陶隱居入山詔 卿遺累却粒尚想清虛山中閒靜得性所樂 當善遂嘉志也若有所須便可以聞仍賜帛 十疋燭二十挺    又别勑 朕月給上茯苓五斤白蜜二斗以供服餌    隱居解官表  臣聞堯風沖天穎陽振飲河之談漢德括  地商陰峻餐芝之氣臣棲遲早日簪帶乆  年仕豈留榮學非待禄恒思縣纓象闕孤  耕壟下席月澗門横琴雲際始奉中恩得  遂丘壑今便滅影桂庭神交松友一出東  關故鄉就望睠言興念臨波瀉淚臣舟棹  已遄無縁躬諸不任攀戀之誠謹奉表以  聞    梁武帝答隱居論書 近二卷欲少留差不爲異紙卷是出裝書既 須見前所以付耳無正可取備於此及欲更 須細書如論箴例逸少書無甚極細書樂毅 論廼微麤健恐非眞蹟太師箴小復方媚筆 力過嫩書體乖異二者已經至鑒此外便無 可付也    隱居與武帝論書表  奉㫖左右中書復稍有能者惟周喜贊夫  以含心之荄實伺夾鍾吐氣今既自上體  妙爲下理用成工每惟申鍾王論於天下  進藝方興所恨臣沉朽不能鑽仰高深自
Interpretation

This passage documents important historical records of Maoshan Daoism during the Northern and Southern Dynasties period, along with official correspondence between emperors and Daoist masters.

The account of Maoshan (the birthplace of the Shangqing lineage of Daoism) mentions: The mountain contains jade nectar and immortal herbs, where dragon mushrooms and celestial plants grow, emitting light at night—all unique products of Mount Liangchang (an ancient name for Maoshan). Here, the northern path connects to the entrance of a grotto-heaven, guarding the gate of the yin palace. Practitioners should diligently cultivate the Dao, maintaining harmony between movement and stillness.

A postscript notes that this text was inscribed in 522 CE (the third year of the Putong era of the Liang Dynasty) on the Jiuxi Stele located south of Huayang Cave on Maoshan, later recorded in the Jianwen Jinshi Chapter.

Several significant official documents follow:

In an imperial edict responding to Tao Hongjing (the renowned Daoist master known as the Hermit) seeking mountain reclusion, Emperor Wu of Qi wrote: "Having relinquished worldly attachments to devote yourself to Daoist practice, you pursue the realm of purity and emptiness—the mountain's tranquility perfectly suits your aspirations. May you fulfill this noble ambition. Should you require anything, make your request known." The emperor granted ten bolts of silk and twenty candles, with an additional decree providing five jin of premium poria cocos and two dou of white honey monthly for his consumption (materials commonly used in Daoist alchemical practices).

Tao Hongjing's eloquently composed memorial resigning from office cites historical precedents: invoking the ancient recluses Xu You from Emperor Yao's era and the Four Haos of Shangshan from the Han Dynasty, he clarifies that his earlier government service was never motivated by worldly glory, having always yearned for reclusion. Now finally fulfilling this wish to withdraw to the mountains, he writes movingly of shedding tears by the riverbank at his departure, with boats prepared and no further chance to express his lingering devotion to the sovereign.

The artistic exchange between Emperor Wu of Liang and Tao Hongjing reveals their calligraphic discourse: The emperor critiques Wang Xizhi's (Yishao) brushwork, judging the Essay on Yue Yi as overly forceful (possibly inauthentic) and the Admonitions of the Grand Preceptor as excessively delicate, lacking seasoned vigor. Tao's reply notes that only Zhou Xi's calligraphy at the Secretariat remains passable, advocating the theories of Zhong Yao and Wang Xizhi—though regretting his advanced age prevents deeper study of these subtle arts.

These documents illustrate imperial reverence for eminent Daoist adepts, the literati's yearning for reclusive spirituality, and the elevated status of calligraphic art during this period.

 懐歎慕前奉神筆三紙並今爲五非但字  字注目廼晝畫抽心日覺勁媚轉不可說  以酬昔歳不復相類正此即爲楷何復多  尋鍾王臣心本自敬重今者彌增愛服俯  仰悦豫不能不以啓適伏蒙二卷伏覽標  帖皆如聖㫖既不顯垂允少留不能乆停  已就摹索者一段未畢不赴今信紙卷先  已經有兼多他雜無所復取亦請伺俱了  日奉送兼此諸書是篇章體臣今不辯復  得修習惟願細書如樂毅論太師箴例依  倣以寫經傳永存㝠題中精要而已    再答後啓 又省别疏云故當宜微以著賞此既勝事誰 風訓非嫌云云然非所習聊試略言夫運筆 邪則無芒角執手寬則書緩弱點畫短則法 臃腫點撇長則法離澌畫促則字横晝踈則 形慢拘則之勢放又少則純骨無媚純肉無 力少墨浮澀多墨笨鈍比並皆然任之所之 自然之理也若抑揚得所趣舍無違值筆連 斷觸勢峰鬱揚波折節中規合矩分間下注 濃纖有方肥瘦相和骨力相稱婉婉曖曖視 之不足稜稜凛凛常有生氣適眼合心便爲 甲科衆家可識亦當復貫串耳六文可工亦 當由習耳一聞能持一見能記且古且今不 無其人大抵爲論終歸是習程邈所以能變 書體爲之舊也張芝所以能善書工學之積 也既舊既積方可以肆其譚吾少來廼至不
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses insights into the art of calligraphy. The author mentions receiving five divine brushwork pieces (referring to calligraphy with sacred connotations), where every character warrants careful appreciation, with even the strokes containing profound skill. The more one examines them, the more exquisite they appear—so marvelous as to defy verbal description.

With humility, the author states that while they have always revered master calligraphers like Zhong Yao and Wang Xizhi, they now hold these works in even higher esteem. They are currently practicing by copying portions of these pieces, though the task remains incomplete. Some calligraphic texts, though rich in content, do not align with their specialized focus; they hope to concentrate on studying exemplary classics like the Discourse on Yue Yi and Admonitions of the Grand Preceptor to transcribe essential scriptures and commentaries.

The second part emphasizes technical aspects of calligraphy: if the brush is not held correctly, the strokes lack sharpness; if gripped too loosely, the characters appear weak. Strokes that are too short seem bloated, while overly extended sweeps and downward strokes make the structure loose. Characters spaced too closely appear cramped, while excessive spacing looks scattered. Too little ink results in a parched look, while too much makes the writing heavy and clumsy. These are all natural principles.

Excellent calligraphy should exhibit: rhythmic brushwork with rises and pauses, structural harmony following established rules, balanced ink tones—neither too dark nor too light—and well-proportioned strokes with equal bone strength (firmness). It should appear both gentle and restrained yet brimming with vitality, pleasing to the eye. Mastering the Six Scripts (the six character-formation methods: indicative, pictographic, phonetic compounds, associative compounds, mutually explanatory, and loan characters) requires diligent study. Just as Cheng Miao developed clerical script and Zhang Zhi became a calligraphy master through long-term accumulation, only such sustained effort allows one to truly grasp the essence of calligraphy. The author mentions that from youth until now ("吾少来乃至不"—the original text is incomplete)....

(缺/□)嘗畫甲子無論於篇紙老而言之亦復何 謂正足見嗤於當今貽笑於後代遂有獨冠 之言覽之背熱隱眞於是乎累眞矣此直一 藝之精非吾所謂勝事此道心之塵非吾所 謂無欲也  樂毅論愚心近甚疑是摹而不敢輕言今  㫖以爲非眞竊自信頗涉有悟箴贊過爲  淪弱許靜素段遂蒙永給仰銘矜奬益無  以喻如此書雖不在法例而致用理均背  間細楷兼復兩玩先於都遇得飛白一卷  云是逸少好蹟臣不嘗别見無以能辨唯  覺勢力驚絶謹以上聖於臣非用脱可充  閣願仍以奉上臣昔於馬澄處見逸少正  書目録一卷澄云右軍勸進洛神賦諸書  十餘首皆作今體唯急就章二篇古法緊  細近脱憶此語當是零落已不復存澄又  云帖註出裝者皆擬賚諸王及朝士臣近  見三卷首帖亦謂已乆分本不敢識此正  復希於三卷中一二條更得預出裝之例  耳天㫖遂復頓給先卷下情益用悚息近  初見卷題云二十三四已欣其多今者賜  書第至二百七十惋訝無已天府如海非  一缾所汲良用息心前後都已蒙見大小  五卷於野拙之分實以過幸若非殊恩豈  可觖望愚固本博涉而不能精昔患無書  可看廼願作主書史晩愛隸法又羡典掌  之人嘗言人生數紀之内識解不能周流  天壤區區唯充恣五欲實可愧恥每以爲
Interpretation

This passage records the author's insights on calligraphic art and collecting experiences, conveying several core perspectives:

The author criticizes those who casually scribble cyclical date markers on paper, considering such frivolous behavior worthy of contemporary ridicule and future generations' derision. He emphasizes that true calligraphic art transcends mere technical skill or the pursuit of empty fame (what he calls "dust on the Dao-heart"), requiring instead a purified state free from worldly desires.

Regarding the work Essay on Yue Yi, the author suspects his collection might contain copies rather than original pieces, though he hesitates to draw definitive conclusions. He candidly admits that while having some discernment in calligraphic appreciation, his expertise remains imperfect. Particular mention is made of Wang Xizhi's (courtesy name Yishao) "flying white" script style—though unable to authenticate its genuineness, he could perceive its astonishing brushwork vigor.

The author recalls viewing Wang Xizhi's catalog at Ma Cheng's residence, which included over ten modern-style works like Exhortation to Advancement and Ode to the Goddess of the Luo River, plus two ancient-style Quick Access Chapters. He laments these precious ink treasures may already be scattered. During that period, the court often bestowed mounted calligraphic models on nobility and officials—the author received five scrolls himself, considering this a profound honor.

In closing, the author modestly states that while broadly learned, his knowledge lacks depth. He once suffered from lacking quality calligraphic models, even considering assuming an archival position. Reflecting on life's brevity, he observes how disgraceful it would be to wallow in sensory pleasures (the "five desires") without pursuing higher realms. This passage reveals an ancient literatus' reverent attitude toward calligraphic art and his pursuit of self-cultivation.

[Note: I've maintained specialized Daoist terminology where applicable (e.g., "Dao-heart" for 道心) while rendering the calligraphy-specific content in natural English. The translation preserves the original's reflective tone and structural flow, with cultural concepts like cyclical dating and "flying white" script appropriately contextualized.]

 得作才鬼亦當勝於頑仙至今猶然始欲  翻之自無射以後國政方殷山心歉默不  敢復以虚閒塵觸謹於此題事遂成煩黷  伏願聖慈照録誠慊 省區別諸書良有精賞所異同所未可知悉 可否耳給事黄門二紙爲任靜書觀所送靜 書諸字相附近二紙靜書體解雜便當非靜 書復當以點畫波撇論極諸家之致此亦非 可倉卒運於豪楮且保拙守中也許任二蹟 並摹者並付反  一一卷中有雜蹟謹疏注如别恐未允愚  衷並竊所摹者亦以上呈近十餘日精慮  悚悸無寧涉事遂至淹替不宜復待填畢  餘條並非用唯叔夜威輦二篇是經書體  式追以單郭爲恨伏按卷上第數甚爲不  少前㫖唯有四卷此似是宋元嘉中撰集  當由自後多致散失逸少有名之迹不過  數首黄庭勸進像贊洛神此等不審猶得  存者  第二十三卷(今見有十二/條在别紙)按此卷是右軍  書惟有八條前樂毅論書廼極勁利而非  甚用意故頗有壊字太師箴大雅吟用意  甚至而更成小拘束廼是書扇頭屏風好  體其餘五片無的可稱臣濤言一紙(此書/廼不)  (□而非右軍又不/識誰迹又似是摹)給事黄門二紙治廉瀝  一紙(是子敬書/亦似摹迹)後又治瀝狸骨方一紙(是/子)  (敬書亦/是摹迹)    右四條非右軍書
Interpretation

This passage documents the authentication and cataloging of ancient calligraphic works. The general meaning is as follows:

After the Wuyi period (an ancient musical pitch-name, here referring to a specific era), with state affairs becoming increasingly demanding, the author felt inwardly ashamed to approach these precious texts in his leisurely capacity. Now he ventures to classify these calligraphic works, hoping the enlightened will recognize his sincere intentions.

The text details the authentication process: some works share similar handwriting but cannot be confirmed as by the same artist, while others require analysis of stroke characteristics to distinguish individual styles. The author emphasizes that calligraphic authentication shouldn't be rushed—one must maintain cautious neutrality.

Specific mentions include two works by Ren Jing (a calligrapher) and several famous pieces by Wang Xizhi (style name Yishao, Eastern Jin dynasty master), such as the Huangting Jing (Yellow Court Classic) and Yue Yi Lun (Discourse on Yue Yi). Volume 23 primarily contains eight works attributed to Wang Xizhi, though the author notes the Yue Yi Lun, while vigorous in brushwork, lacks careful execution with some damaged characters. In contrast, the Taishi Zhen (Admonitions of the Grand Preceptor) and Dayayin (Ode to Noble Virtue) show meticulous craftsmanship, albeit somewhat restrained—as if composed on a fan's surface.

Finally, four works are identified as not genuine Wang Xizhi pieces, with two suspected to be copies by Wang Xianzhi (style name Zijing, Wang Xizhi's son), including the Zhi Lian Li and Li Gu Fang. The entire passage exemplifies the rigorous methodology and attitude of ancient calligraphic authentication.

 第二十四卷(今見有二/十一條在)按此卷是右軍書  者唯有十一條(皆非甚合迹兼多漫/抹於摹起難復委曲)前黃  初二年一紙(是後人/學右軍)謬襲告墓文一紙(是/許)  (先生/書)抱懷幽痛一紙(是張/澄書)五月十一日一  紙(是摹王泯/書被油)尚想黄綺一紙遂結滯一紙  (凡一篇並後人/所學甚拙□)不復展一紙(是子/敬書)便復改  月一紙(是張/翼書)五月十五日繇白一紙(亦是/王泯)  (書)治欬方一紙(是謝/安書)    右十條非右軍書  伏恐未垂許以區别今謹上許先生任靜  書如别比方即可知王泯張澄張翼謝安  書公家應有 鍾王廼有一卷傳以爲眞意謂悉是摹學多 不足論有兩三行許似摹微得鍾體逸少學 鍾的可知近有二十許首此外字細畫短多 是鍾法今欲令人帖裝未便得付來月有竟 者當遣送也  啓伏覽書前意雖止二六而規矩必周後  書不出二百亦褒貶大備一言以蔽便書  情極頓使元常老骨更蒙榮造子敬懦肌  不沉泉夜唯逸少得進退其間則玉科顯  然可觀若非聖證品析恐愛附近習之風  永遂淪迷矣伯英既稱草聖元常亦自隸  絶論㫖所謂殆同一機神寳曠世莫繼斯  理既明諸晝虎之徒當日就輟筆反古歸
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the authentication of several ancient calligraphic works. It begins by listing eleven pieces, ten of which have been confirmed as not being authentic works by Wang Xizhi (known as Youjun), but rather later imitations or pieces written by others. These include: one piece dated to the second year of Huangchu period (in the style of Wang Xizhi by a later hand), the "Epitaph for Miu Xi" (written by Xu Xiansheng), "Embracing Sorrow" (by Zhang Cheng), "May 11th" (written by Wang Min but stained with oil), "Still Remembering Huang and Qi", "Thus Lingering" (clumsy imitations by later hands), "No More Unfolding" (by Wang Xianzhi), "Changing Months Again" (by Zhang Yi), "Zhong Yao's Note Dated May 15th" (also by Wang Min), and "Cough Remedy" (by Xie An).

The discussion then turns to works attributed to Zhong Yao and Wang Xizhi, noting that among existing scrolls claimed as authentic, most are later copies with only two or three lines slightly resembling Zhong Yao's style. Over twenty pieces bearing characteristics of Zhong Yao's brushwork are mentioned. The author expresses intention to mount these works into an album, though requiring time for proper arrangement.

The concluding section evaluates several master calligraphers: Wang Xizhi (Yishao) is regarded as the most accomplished, achieving perfect synthesis; Zhong Yao (Yuanchang)'s clerical script is deemed unparalleled; while Zhang Zhi (Boying) is honored as the "Sage of Cursive Script." The author emphasizes the importance of distinguishing authenticity, warning that failure to do so would lead later generations astray in a fog of forgeries. True understanding of calligraphic essence should prompt superficial imitators to lay down their brushes in reflection.

(Note: "Youjun" refers to Wang Xizhi, "Yishao" was his courtesy name; "Yuanchang" was Zhong Yao's courtesy name; "Zijing" was Wang Xianzhi's courtesy name; "Boying" was Zhang Zhi's courtesy name—all being renowned calligraphers of the Wei-Jin period.)

 眞方弘盛世愚管見預聞喜佩無届比世  皆尚子敬元未繼以齊代名實脱略海内  非唯不復知有元常於逸少亦然非排棄  所可黜涅而不淄不過數族今奉此論自  舞自跳未足逞泄願以所摹竊示洪遠思  曠此二人皆是均思者必當贊仰踴躍有  盈半之益臣與洪遠雖不相識從子翊以  學往來因之有會但既在閣恐或已應聞  知摹者所裝字大小不堪均調郭看廼尚  可恐筆意大殊此篇方傳千載故宜令跡  隨矣所奉三紙伏循字跡大覺勁密竊恐  既以言發意意則應言而心隨意連手與  筆會故益得諧稱下情歡仰寳奉愈至世  論咸云江東無復鍾蹟常以歎息皆竚望  中原廓清太丘之碑可就摹採今論㫖云  眞蹟雖少可得而推是猶有存者不審可  復幾字既無出見理冒願得工人摹填數  行脱蒙見賜實爲過幸又逸少學鍾勢巧  形密勝於自連不審此例復有幾紙垂㫖  以黃庭像贊等諸文可更有出給理自運  之蹟今不復希請學鍾妙仰惟殊恩    又啓  逸少自吴興以前諸書猶未稱凡厥好迹  皆是向會稽時永和十許年中者從失郡  告靈不仕以後略不復自書皆使此一人  世中不能别見其緩異呼爲末年書逸少  亡後子敬年十七八仝倣此人書故遂成  與之相似今聖㫖標顯足使衆識頓悟於
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the transmission and appreciation of calligraphic art, addressing the circulation of works by master calligraphers such as Wang Xizhi (Yishao), Wang Xianzhi (Zijing), and Zhong Yao (Yuanchang).

The author laments that people of his time revered only Wang Xianzhi's calligraphy while overlooking the artistic achievements of Zhong Yao and Wang Xizhi. He argues that truly sublime calligraphy does not lose its value with the passage of time, yet few in his era could still appreciate these masterpieces. The author particularly admires two connoisseurs, Hong Yuan and Sikuang, believing they possess the discernment to truly understand these artistic treasures.

The text mentions that the author has collected several calligraphic copies but worries about their accuracy, especially concerning deviations in brushwork from the originals. He expresses a desire to find highly skilled artisans to reproduce a few lines from Zhong Yao’s authentic works, believing such calligraphy should endure for eternity.

Regarding Wang Xizhi’s calligraphy, the author notes that his works before his tenure in Wuxing were still unrefined, with his finest pieces created during his time in Kuaiji (around the tenth year of the Yonghe era). After resigning from office, Wang Xizhi rarely wrote himself, often delegating the task to others, making it difficult for later generations to distinguish authenticity. Many mistakenly attributed these proxy works to his later years. Following Wang Xizhi’s death, his son Wang Xianzhi, at seventeen or eighteen, imitated the style of these proxy calligraphers, resulting in a manner resembling his father’s. The author believes that through meticulous textual research, the true nature of these calligraphic works can now be clarified for all.

 逸少無末年之譏阮研近聞有一人學研  書遂不復可别臣比郭摹所得雖粗寫字  形而無復其用筆跡勢不審前後諸卷一  兩條謹密者可得在出裝之例復蒙垂給  至年末間否此澤自天直以啓審非敢必  覬    武帝答進玄通記手詔 省疏並見周氏遺蹟眞言顯然符驗前誥二 三明白益爲奇特四卷今留之見淵文並具 一二唯增讚歎十二月二十日    隱居進周氏玄通記啓  某啓去十月將末忽有周氏事既在齋禁  無由即得啓聞今謹撰事蹟凡四卷如别  上呈但某覆鄣疑網不早信悟追自咎悼  分貽刻責淵文口具陳述
Interpretation

Wang Xizhi (courtesy name Yishao) in his later years never faced criticism for his calligraphy. Yet I've heard that recently someone attempted to imitate Ruan Yan's (a Southern Dynasty calligrapher) brushwork, producing works so convincing they blurred the line between authentic and forged. Recently, while comparing my efforts to Guo Mo's (likely a contemporary calligrapher) works, though I could approximate the forms, I failed to capture the spiritual resonance of his brush techniques. Among my previous collections, only one or two pieces with rigorous brushwork remain worthy of mounting. I remain ever grateful for your previous generosity—might I inquire whether another blessing may come before year's end? This lies wholly in Heaven's will; I dare ask but dare not demand.

Emperor Wu of Liang's rescript to Tao Hongjing (styled Recluse Master) regarding the presented "Zhou's Records of Mystical Communion":

We have examined your memorial and the surviving texts of Master Zhou. The revealed truths therein shine with clarity, perfectly aligning with prior prophecies—truly a marvel of profound mystery. These four volumes of "Records of Mystical Communion" shall temporarily remain in the palace archives. Having perused their contents, We find nothing but cause for admiration. Twentieth day of the twelfth month.

Tao Hongjing's memorial presenting "Zhou's Records of Mystical Communion":

Your servant reports: In late October last year, sudden manifestations of Zhou's (likely referring to Zhou Ziliang, Tao's disciple) spiritual communion occurred. As this coincided with our purification retreat (zhai), immediate reporting proved impossible. Now I've compiled the complete account into four volumes for presentation. I alone bear blame for my dull-witted skepticism in failing to perceive these heavenly signs earlier—my remorse knows no bounds, and I stand ready for punishment. The detailed account has been orally recorded by Yuanwen (likely Tao's disciple). I beg Your Majesty's forgiveness for your servant's obtuseness. Respectfully submitted.

(This record from Volume One of "Maoshan Chronicles" documents Tao Hongjing reporting his disciple's extraordinary spiritual experiences to Emperor Wu of Liang. It references Daoist concepts like "revealed truths" (zhenyan) and "talismanic verification" (fuyan)—mystical prophecies and their manifestations attained through specialized cultivation. "Purification restrictions" (zhaijin) denote periods when Daoist practitioners observe purity practices, abstaining from worldly affairs during dedicated spiritual training.)

伏願𠖅以闇惰  謹啓 茅山志卷之一

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5a0316); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

Vol. 2 →