中文 · EN

《唐玄宗御製道德真經疏(一)》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 3 / 10 7,073 characters

About this page. The original text of 《唐玄宗御製道德真經疏(一)》 Vol. 3 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 14 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《唐玄宗御製道德真經疏(一)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

唐玄宗御製道德眞經䟽卷之三    絶聖章第十九(前章明風俗頽弊失/道而仁義遂行此章)    (明絶棄多門還淳則盜賊無有首六/句且絶矜徇之迹次三句將明立教)    (之方後四句示/行門之由趣爾) 絶聖棄智民利百倍  䟽聖者有爲制作之聖智者凡俗矜徇之  智制作之聖則有迹矜徇之智則非眞失  眞是生巧僞逐迹坐令喪本故皆絶棄之  而令其淳樸天和旣暢矜徇不行是人有  百倍之利也 絶仁棄義民復孝慈  䟽前章云大道廢有仁義此云絶仁棄義  民復孝慈者明大道之世所謂玄同民無  私親悉皆慈孝故理至則迹滅事當而名  去今六紀廢絶則孝慈名彰若絶兼愛之  仁棄裁非之義江湖無濡沬之迹慈孝有  自然之素故民復於大孝慈矣 絶巧棄利盜賊無有  䟽絶巧者絶雕琢非法淫過之巧棄利者  棄徇財兼并乾没之利夫盜賊者生於羡  欲不足令絶巧則人不爭棄利則人自足  復誰爲盜賊乎故云無有 此三者以爲文不足故令有所屬  䟽三者謂絶聖棄智一也絶仁棄義二也  絶巧棄利三也此三者且令絶棄未有修  行故以爲此三者於文不足以垂教更令  有所屬著在下文見素等是也 見素抱樸少私寡欲  䟽欲求絶聖棄智則常見眞素欲求絶仁  棄義則懷抱質樸欲求絶巧棄利則當少
Interpretation

In his commentary on Chapter 19 of the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue), Emperor Xuanzong of Tang primarily expounds on how to restore society's natural simplicity by abandoning artificial contrivances. The passage can be divided into three layers of meaning:

First, the line "Eliminate sageliness and discard wisdom, and the people will benefit a hundredfold." Here, "sageliness" refers to those who deliberately establish rituals and legal systems, while "wisdom" denotes the worldly display of cleverness. Such artificial constructs breed hypocrisy and cunning, causing people to lose their innate nature. Only by abandoning these can one restore the simple, genuine character of humanity, bringing the common people a hundredfold increase in benefits.

Next, the text states, "Eliminate benevolence and discard righteousness, and the people will return to filial piety and kindness." In an age when the Dao (the Way) prevails, people naturally express filial piety and compassion without the need to deliberately uphold benevolence and righteousness. When social norms deteriorate, filial piety and kindness become virtues that must be explicitly emphasized. If people can discard forced displays of kindness and moral judgments, they can return to their natural, sincere filial and compassionate nature.

The third point, "Eliminate cleverness and discard profit, and there will be no thieves," explains that one must reject overly intricate artifacts and the pursuit of material gain. Thieves arise from greed—when people no longer chase after extravagant craftsmanship or covet others' possessions, theft naturally disappears.

Finally, the commentary notes that these three principles alone are insufficient to fully transform society. One must further "manifest plainness and embrace simplicity, reduce selfishness and diminish desires": maintain one's pure and genuine nature while lessening self-interest and cravings. This is the fundamental method for achieving the goals outlined above. Emperor Xuanzong emphasizes that to truly attain the state of eliminating sageliness and discarding wisdom, one must constantly preserve purity; to realize the elimination of benevolence and righteousness, one must steadfastly uphold simplicity; and to accomplish the elimination of cleverness and profit, one must necessarily reduce selfish desires.

 私寡欲三絶雖於文不足四行則修身有  餘將欲禁絶於中心故必取資於内行爾    絶學無憂章第二十(前章明絶棄多/門還淳則盜賊)    (無有此章明畏除俗學若昏故獨異/於人首一句標門以示絶次七句舉)    (喻以明理又一十七句格凡聖/以對辯後兩句論獨行以結成) 絶學無憂  䟽絶學者絶有爲俗學也夫人之禀生必  有眞素越分求學傷性則多若令都絶不  爲是使物無修習今明乃絶有爲過分之  學即莊子所謂俗學以求復其初者若分  内之學因性之爲上士勤行未爲不絶也  故曰絶學無憂 唯之與阿相去幾何善之與惡相去何若  䟽唯恭應也周禮曰先生召無諾唯而起  阿慢應也漢書曰不誰何綰謂何問也此  舉喻也唯之與阿同出於口唯恭則善阿  慢則惡學之不絶只在於心絶之則無憂  不絶則生患同出於口故云相去幾何只  在於心故去相去何若若能了學無學學  相皆空於知忘知不生分别則唯阿齊致  善惡兩忘也 人之所畏不可不畏  䟽人之所畏者畏慢與惡也夫慢則爲過  惡則被嫌被嫌則人所棄薄爲過則物多  尤怨以况有爲俗學增長是非若不畏而  絶之是皆違分傷性故不可畏而絶之也 荒兮其未央哉  䟽荒廢也慢惡爲過俗學失眞是皆可畏  故當絶棄若不絶而棄之則正性荒廢其
Interpretation

This passage speaks of abandoning excessive worldly knowledge to return to one's innate nature. Humans are born with pure and simple essence, but excessive pursuit of external learning can harm this original nature. The so-called "renouncing learning" does not mean abandoning study altogether, but rather discarding knowledge that contradicts natural tendencies—those overly complicated pursuits. As Zhuangzi taught, one must cast aside worldly scholarship to return to the primordial state. True learning should align with innate nature, for such study brings no distress.

What difference exists between a reverent reply and an arrogant response? How far apart are good and evil? Both are words spoken from the mouth—reverence becomes good, arrogance becomes evil. The key lies in whether the mind remains attached. If one can see through the nature of learning and understand that all distinctions are illusory, they can transcend the duality of good and evil.

The arrogance and wickedness that people fear are indeed worthy of vigilance. Pride invites fault, evil deeds incur rejection—just as excessive pursuit of worldly knowledge breeds contention. Without vigilance and restraint, these tendencies violate and damage one's inherent nature.

If left unchecked, these harmful habits will gradually erode human purity. Arrogance, wickedness, and worldly learning all cause one to lose their true nature, so they must be resolutely abandoned. Without timely rejection, the proper path (Dao) would spread endlessly like a boundless wilderness.

 未有央止之時詩曰夜未央言更漏尚多  也此云其未央言俗學傷性無息止期故  前途尚多云未央也 衆人熙熙如享太牢如登春臺  䟽熙熙者情欲摇動之貌此明不畏絶俗  學之人夫俗學有爲動生情欲熙熙逐境  役役終身如餒夫之臨享太牢恣貪滋味  冶容之春臺登望動生愛著太牢者牛羊  豕也春臺所以爲愛著者謂其卉木滋榮  禽鳥鳴匹陽和陶然易淫蕩也故邠詩云  春日遲遲采蘩祁祁汝心傷悲迨及公子  同歸也 我獨怕兮其未兆如嬰兒之未孩  䟽我老君自稱言我畏絶俗學抱道含和  獨能怕然安靜於彼世間有爲之事情欲  等法略無形兆如彼嬰兒未能孩笑無分  别也孩者别人之意莊子曰不至於孩而  始誰 乗乗兮若無所歸  䟽乗乗運動之貌也衆人動生耽著常有  執求故若有所歸往我本無心怕然安靜  乗流則逝值坎而止若彼行道之人無所  歸趣不汲汲也 衆人皆有餘而我獨若遺  䟽衆人俗學耽著矜誇巧智是法皆執自  爲有餘我獨損之未嘗凝滯心無愛染故  若遺忘也 我愚人之心也哉純純兮  䟽言我於諸法中體了無著故若遺忘豈  如愚人之心也但我心純純質樸無愛欲  故若遺爾 俗人昭昭我獨若昏俗人察察我獨悶悶忽 若晦寂号似無所止
Interpretation

This passage presents Emperor Xuanzong of Tang's commentary on the Daode Jing, using vivid metaphors to illustrate the contrast between Daoist practitioners and worldly people.

Worldly people indulge in desires like guests at a grand sacrificial banquet (the "tai lao" refers to the three sacrificial animals: ox, sheep, and pig), greedily feasting on delicacies. They resemble springtime visitors ascending high platforms, intoxicated by the beauty of flowers and birdsong. Their cravings know no bounds, just as the poetic phrase "the night not yet half-spent" suggests—perpetually chasing external things, bustling through an entire lifetime in restless pursuit.

In contrast, Laozi (who refers to himself as "I" in the text) resembles an infant who hasn't yet learned to smile, his mind pure and free from discriminating thoughts. He follows nature's flow like water that naturally settles in low-lying areas, unlike worldly people who stubbornly chase after things. While ordinary people flaunt their cleverness and talents, Laozi seems to have forgotten everything; where others calculate shrewdly, he appears muddled like a simpleton.

Three sets of contrasts emerge here:

1. Worldly people reveling in feasts vs. Laozi's infant-like tranquility

2. People actively pursuing goals vs. Laozi's acceptance of circumstances

3. The ostentatious cleverness of ordinary people vs. Laozi's great wisdom that appears foolish

Notes:

  • "Tai lao" refers to the highest-grade sacrificial banquet in ancient rituals
  • "Spring platform" symbolizes scenic high terraces visited in springtime, representing intoxicating beauty
  • "Infant" denotes the developmental stage when babies begin recognizing people
  • "Flowing along" describes the natural state of following the current

Through these contrasts, Emperor Xuanzong elucidates the Daoist cultivation principle of "daily diminishing for the Dao"—true practitioners must continually reduce desires to return to the pristine simplicity of an infant's state.

 䟽昭昭自矜衒巧智也若昏者若昏昩無  所分别也察察者施教立法以繩下也悶  悶者無心寬大之意也所以昭昭矜衒察  察施教者皆由不絶俗學與有爲故聖人  畏絶若昏默也 忽若晦寂兮似無所止  䟽絶學之人忽忽無心常若昏昩而心寂  然曾不愛染於法無住故似無所止著爾 衆人皆有以我獨頑似鄙  䟽凡俗之人不畏俗學所以耽滯逐境未  曾休息我於世間獨無分别有似鄙陋頑  者無分别也鄙者陋不足也而心實了悟  故云似爾自衆人熙熙下皆對明也 我獨異於人而貴求食於母  䟽此兩句結成也我獨異於人者異於不  絶俗學之凡人也即上對明諸法與凡人  異凡人愛染有爲我獨遺忘情欲凡人於  諸法分别我獨等無是非故云異於人而  貴求食於母者老君戒人守樸全和少私  寡欲絶視聽之耽著杜聲名之奔競令如  嬰兒但求食於母爾故云而貴求食於母    孔德之容章第二十一(前章明畏絶/俗學若昏故)    (獨異於人此章明從順至道甚眞則/能閲衆甫首標孔德兩句明德人之)    (順道次道之爲物下十句暢妙本之/精自古下五句辯應用之名結生成)    (之德/爾)  孔德之容唯道是從  䟽孔甚也從順也容容狀也欲明行人所  以順合至道故云甚有德人之容狀若何
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the distinction between Dao cultivators and worldly people. Dao cultivators may appear dull and simple-minded, yet their inner being remains clear and awakened; worldly people seem clever and capable, but are actually bound by various desires and knowledge.

The Dao cultivator (sage) resembles one in deep slumber who makes no distinctions between right and wrong, like a melancholy person free from petty calculations. They neither deliberately display intelligence nor establish rules to constrain others. Those who enjoy flaunting their cleverness and creating regulations do so because they remain trapped in worldly learning and deliberate action.

True Dao cultivators maintain inner emptiness and stillness, undisturbed by external things, appearing indecisive like dim twilight. Worldly people chase after external objects without cease, while Dao cultivators seem foolish and crude, yet their inner understanding flows unimpeded.

Laozi teaches people to be simple like infants, seeking only basic survival needs ("seeking nourishment from the Mother"), preserving their original质朴 (simplicity) nature, reducing selfish desires, remaining unswayed by sensory pleasures, and avoiding pursuit of empty fame. The fundamental difference between Dao cultivators and worldly people lies herein: worldly people indulge in various actions and discriminations, while Dao cultivators transcend emotional desires and make no distinctions between right and wrong.

The latter section mentions that "great De (Virtue)" manifests as complete alignment with the Dao's patterns. The reason Dao cultivators' conduct naturally accords with the great Dao is their possession of supreme virtue. Through contrasting practitioners with worldly people, this passage illustrates how true wisdom lies in returning to原始 (original) simplicity and following nature's flow.

 言甚有德人之容狀唯虚極之道是順爾 道之爲物惟恍惟惚  䟽此明虚極妙本爲物形狀即孔德所從  之道也虚極妙本强名曰道道之爲物其  運動形狀若何言此妙本不有不無難爲  名稱欲謂之有則寂然無象欲爲之無則  湛似或存無有難名故謂之爲恍惚爾 惚兮恍兮其中有象  䟽此明降生本迹也惚無也恍有也兆見  曰象妙本無物故謂之惚生化有形故謂  之恍斯則自無而降有其中兆見一切物  象從本而降迹也 恍兮惚兮其中有物  䟽物者即上道之爲物謂妙本也妙本降  生兆見衆象修性反德則復歸無物無物  即道也言人修性反德不離妙本自有歸  無遺冥至道故云其中有物言有妙物也  此攝迹以歸本也 窈兮冥兮其中有精  䟽窈冥深昩也虚極降生修性反本攝迹  歸本妙物或存窈冥深昩不可量測含孕  變化中有至精故云其中有精也 其精甚眞其中有信  䟽至道妙物旣本非假雜變化至精故其  精甚眞生成之功遍被群有物感必應曾  不差違故云其中有信 自古及今其名不去以閲衆甫  䟽閲度閲也甫本始也言道德生成之功  窈冥眞精之信始終無極今古不渝故物  得道用之名天清地寧之類自古至今常  不去也故注云生成之用旣今古是同應  用之名故古今不去也以此精眞之信度
Interpretation

This passage explains the essence and manifestations of the Dao (the Way). As the cosmic origin and ultimate truth, the Dao exists in a state that is both indistinct and elusive. Without fixed form, it cannot be described as either fully existent or completely non-existent, hence the term "huanghu" (vague and fleeting) is used to characterize this condition.

Within this seemingly void state actually lie the embryonic forms of all things ("xiang"). "Hu" represents emptiness while "huang" signifies existence. The Dao gives birth to all tangible phenomena from this formless void, manifesting concrete appearances from its fundamental source. Though the Dao itself has no shape or form, within its profound obscurity resides the purest essence ("jing"). This essence is utterly authentic, possessing definite regularity ("xin"), and responds precisely to the needs of all beings.

From ancient times to the present, the Dao's name and function have never changed. Its generative power remains constant, which is why all things in heaven and earth depend on the Dao's operation for their existence. For instance, heaven maintains its clarity and earth preserves its stability—these are unchanging manifestations of the Dao's function throughout history. Through this authentic and unfailing essence, we can contemplate the primordial nature of all existence.

 閲萬物本始令各遂其生成之用爾 吾何以知衆甫之然哉以此  䟽又詳云吾何知萬物本始皆禀於道道  必度閲之令達其生成用然哉答云以此  甚精甚信凡今萬物皆禀生成故知之爾    曲則全章第二十二(前章明從順至/道甚眞故能閲)    (衆甫此章明抱一爲式不爭則所謂/曲全者六句示誠全之行是以下兩)    (句標聖行以明次四句覆釋曲全至/弊新夫唯下結不爭必全而歸爾) 曲則全  䟽曲者委曲從順者也言人能委曲從順  不與物忤則可以全身故云曲則全 枉則直  䟽枉者受屈於物直者可以正曲也春秋  曰正曲爲直言人雖不與物忤若物來枉  己己能受屈彼必慚懼而自修整則是己  之直可以正曲故云枉則直 窪則盈  䟽窪坳下盈滿也此喻説也夫地之坳下  水必流滿人守撝謙德便光大能曲能枉  坳下也則全則直滿盈也故云窪則盈 弊則新  䟽弊薄惡之謂也曲枉窪等皆自處弊薄  也能處弊薄人必推先故其德行日新矣  故曰弊則新 少則得多則惑是以聖人抱一爲天下式  䟽夫少自取者則無失故云得多自與者  人必爭故云惑修身旣爾修道亦然當須  抱守淳一自全眞素若欲廣求異門則招  亂惑故亡羊必因歧路喪生諒在多方是  以聖人抱一不離可爲天下法式矣式法  也
Interpretation

All things in their primordial origin follow the laws of Dao (the Way), each fulfilling its function of growth and development. The reason I can comprehend the original state of all things is precisely through observing this exquisite arrangement of Dao. All existing phenomena follow Dao's generative principles, and thus can be known and understood.

Chapter 22 expounds the principle of "yielding to achieve completeness" (while the previous chapter illustrated the marvelous functions of following ultimate truth, this chapter clarifies maintaining pure unity as a principle for worldly conduct).

Bending may preserve wholeness. The "bending" here refers to gentle compliance. When humans can yield themselves, accommodating external things without resistance, they preserve their integrity—hence "the bent shall be made straight."

Enduring injustice leads to rectitude. "Injustice" refers to external oppression, while "rectitude" means correcting distortions. As the Spring and Autumn Annals state: "To straighten the crooked is rectitude." Even without actively resisting external forces, if one endures oppression, the oppressor may feel ashamed and self-correct—thus one's integrity rectifies external distortions. Hence "the wronged shall be set right."

Low places become filled. "Hollows" denote depressions, "fullness" means being filled—this is metaphorical. Just as low-lying ground naturally collects water, maintaining humble virtue magnifies one's being. Through bending, enduring injustice, and occupying low positions (like hollows), one attains completeness, rectitude and abundance. Therefore "the hollow shall be filled."

Worn-out things renew themselves. "Worn" indicates shabbiness. Bending, enduring injustice and occupying low positions all demonstrate self-abasement. Those content with humility gain public esteem, their virtue renewed daily—hence "the worn shall be renewed."

Taking less gains more; grasping much brings confusion. Therefore the sage holds to unity as the world's standard. Seeking little from outside incurs no loss—this is "gain." Hoarding much invites contention—this is "confusion." This applies equally to self-cultivation and Dao practice: preserve simple, undivided nature to protect purity. Seeking diverse esoteric arts breeds chaos—like sheep lost through many branching paths, or lives wasted pursuing complexity. Thus the sage maintains unity without abandoning fundamentals, establishing the world's standard. "Standard" here means guiding principle.

不自見故明  䟽此覆釋曲則全也言人能不自見其美  嘗委順於物其全德日益明白也故云故  明 不自是故彰  䟽此覆釋枉則直也言人能爲物受枉不  自申説以爲己是是必無尤故其直自彰  著也故云故彰 不自伐故有功  䟽此覆釋窪則盈也言人不自伐取嘗爲  謙讓則人不與競其功歸己如地坳下水  必盈焉故云故有功 不自矜故長  䟽此覆釋弊則新也言人能守弊薄不自  矜炫則人必推敬善行益長故云故長 夫唯不爭故天下莫能與之爭  䟽夫唯曲全等行皆是委順不爭柔弱旣  勝於剛强謙虚自歸於枉直則天下人物  誰能與爭乎故云莫能與之爭 古之所謂曲則全者豈虚言哉誠全而歸之  䟽此引古以結曲全也言自古有此曲全  之言豈虚有此言而無實者哉若能曲順  不逆者信有全理歸之於己爾故云誠全  而歸之誠信也    希言自然章第二十三(前章明抱一/爲式不爭故)    (所謂曲全此章明契道忘言執滯則/自同於失首一句標宗以明理次五)    (句舉喻以申教故從/事下廣理喻以結成) 希言自然  䟽此明言教不可執滯希言者忘言也夫  言者在乎悟道悟道則忘言不可都忘要  其詮理但自然之理不當有與不有希言  之義亦不定言故以希言之言用顯自然
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the profound meaning behind famous phrases from the Dao De Jing such as "not displaying oneself, thus becoming enlightened." Emperor Xuanzong of Tang noted in his commentary that when one does not deliberately showcase their virtues, their De (Virtue/Power) becomes more apparent; when one does not stubbornly cling to personal views, truth naturally manifests; when one refrains from self-promotion, genuine achievements are accomplished; and when one avoids arrogance, lasting progress is attained.

These principles stem from the wisdom of "yielding to attain wholeness." Just as water naturally fills low-lying areas by flowing downward, maintaining a posture of softness and humility ultimately surpasses rigid competitiveness. This attitude of non-contention with others ensures that no one in the world can contend with you. The ancient saying "to bend is to be whole" (委屈反而能保全) is no empty phrase but practical wisdom for living.

Chapter 23's "sparse words are natural" further clarifies: true principle does not lie in clinging to language. The notion of "sparse words" (希言) encourages transcending linguistic constraints upon comprehending the Dao. The natural Way neither deliberately pursues "being" nor "non-being," but rises above such dualities. Expressing natural principles through concise language represents the most sublime form of communication.

(Note: "To bend is to be whole" refers to how yielding brings preservation; "sparse words" means speaking less or transcending language; "yielding compliance" refers to harmonizing with nature)

 之理故云希爾若能因彼言教悟證精微  不滯筌蹄則合於自然矣故云希言自然 飄風不終朝驟雨不終日  䟽飄風狂疾之風也驟雨暴急之雨也夫  風者所以散物雨者所以潤物若狂疾暴  急則害物而不乆以况言教所以詮理若  執言滯教則無由悟了必失道而生迷故  風雨不可飄驟言教不可執滯也欲明忘  言即合自然故舉飄風驟雨之喻爾 孰爲此者天地天地尚不能乆而况於人乎  䟽孰誰也設問云誰爲此飄風驟雨者答  云天地天地至大欲爲狂暴尚不能乆况  於凡人執滯言教而爲卒暴不能虚忘漸  致造極欲求了悟其可得乎 故從事於道者  䟽從者順也虚極至道沖用無方在物則  通未嘗凝滯故凡人欲體斯妙道而順  者不當有所執滯爾故云從事於道 道者同於道  䟽順同於道之人故謂之道者謂能順事  於道則不凝滯悟了言教一無封執可與  道同故云同於道爾 德者同於德  䟽德者道用之名也謂其功用被物物有  所得故謂之德爾謂體悟之人順事於道  豈唯自能了出抑亦功濟蒼生蒼生被其  德德者忘其功凡所施爲同於道用故云  德者同於德爾 失者同於失  䟽失者謂執滯言教而失道也夫言教者  道理之筌蹄也有筌蹄者乃得魚兔今滯  守筌蹄則失魚兔矣執滯言教則失妙理
Interpretation

The text discusses how spiritual cultivators should properly balance verbal teachings with the natural Dao (the Way).

A gale (referring to violent winds) does not rage all day, nor does a downpour last an entire day. A gale should disperse all things, and a downpour should nourish the earth, but if they are too fierce and sudden, they end up harming all things and cannot endure. This is like verbal teachings, which are meant to illuminate principles—yet if one clings to the surface of words and rigidly adheres to doctrines, one cannot truly comprehend the great Dao (the Way) and will instead lose direction. Thus, just as wind and rain should not be excessively violent, one should not stubbornly cling to verbal teachings either.

Who, then, can create such violent gales and storms? It is Heaven and Earth. Even the vast and boundless Heaven and Earth cannot sustain such violent states for long—how much less can ordinary people? If mortals obstinately cling to verbal doctrines, act with impatience and harshness, and fail to embrace emptiness, stillness, and self-forgetfulness, how could they ever reach the highest state and attain true enlightenment?

Therefore, those who follow the Dao (the Way) should align with its natural rhythms. The Dao (the Way) is supremely empty and endlessly transforming, flowing unimpeded through all things without stagnation. Those who seek to comprehend this profound Dao (the Way) should likewise hold no attachments or rigidities. Those who can align with the Dao (the Way) in this manner are called "people of the Dao (the Way)," for they do not cling to verbal doctrines but merge with the great Dao (the Way).

"De (Virtue/Power)" is the functional manifestation of the Dao (the Way), referring to how the Dao (the Way) operates within all things, allowing each to attain its proper state. Those who truly comprehend the Dao (the Way) not only transcend themselves but also bring benefit to all beings. Sentient beings receive the nourishing influence of their De (Virtue/Power), yet those who embody De (Virtue/Power) claim no merit. Such actions are in perfect harmony with the functioning of the Dao (the Way).

"Loss" refers to those who cling to verbal doctrines and thus stray from the Dao (the Way). Verbal teachings are like fish traps (筌) and rabbit snares (蹄)—tools meant to capture truth. But if one fixates on the tools, one loses the actual fish and rabbit; similarly, stubborn attachment to verbal doctrines causes one to miss the profound truth.

 矣失理則無由得道是自同於失也故云  失者同於失 同於道者道亦得之同於德者德亦得之同 於失者失亦得之  䟽此明氣同則應也故虎嘯風生鶴鳴子  和性殊則肝膽楚越道合則夷夏同人以  類相從物無違者故同道則道應同失則  失來猶方諸挹月而水流陽燧照日而火  就爾故云同於道者道亦得之 信不足有不信  䟽言人之所以不能體了證理忘言謂於  信悟不足而生惑滯旣生惑滯則執言求  悟執言求悟則却生迷倒是有不信應之  也故云有不信也    跂者不立章第二十四(前章明理契/言忘執滯則)    (同於失者此章明自見自是矜伐故/物或惡之首兩句舉喻示難求次四)    (句明雖求亦不得其於道下/將申戒勸令有道之人不處) 跂者不立跨者不行  䟽跂舉踵而望也跨以跨挾物也此舉喻  也夫延頸舉踵欲求遠望翹跂則危故不  可立以跨挾物物必爲礙必不可行亦如  衆生自見自是等也故跂者不立跨則不  行自見則不明自是則不彰斷可知矣 自見者不明  䟽夫自見之人失於殷鑒露才揚己欲以  自明殊不知動則見尤物無與者己之事  業終於昩然故云自見者不明 自是者不彰  䟽言人不能曲全而自以爲是且欲大誇  諸己而以出衆爲心求彰名迹以自光大
Interpretation

This passage discusses several common pitfalls in the practice of Daoist cultivation and their consequences.

First, it explains that deviation from the fundamental truth of the Dao (the Way) naturally prevents one from attaining enlightenment. Just as choosing to associate with error invites error, walking with the Dao allows the Dao to embrace you, while accompanying De (Virtue/Power) enables De to fulfill you. This mirrors the natural principle of sympathetic resonance: a tiger's roar summons the wind, and a crane's call draws responses from its young. When humans align with the Dao, people from different regions and cultures can coexist harmoniously.

The text then analyzes why some fail to comprehend the true essence. The root cause lies in insufficient sincerity and reverence within the heart, lacking genuine faith in the Dao. Once doubt and attachment arise, people rigidly cling to literal interpretations while forcibly seeking liberation, only to sink deeper into delusion. This illustrates the principle that "insufficient faith gives birth to doubt."

Chapter 24 employs vivid metaphors to demonstrate the harm of forced striving: standing on tiptoes to appear taller ("the tiptoer") actually makes one unsteady; taking oversized strides to move faster ("the overstepper") prevents going far. Similarly, when cultivators constantly self-display ("self-revealing") or insist on being right ("self-approving"), they achieve the opposite effect.

Specifically: those fond of self-revelation always seek to showcase abilities and promote themselves, believing this demonstrates superiority. Unaware that this only invites criticism and fails to gain others' recognition, they ultimately obscure their own cultivation. Meanwhile, self-approving practitioners cannot consider matters comprehensively yet persistently believe themselves correct, striving for attention and fame—precisely preventing the true radiance of the Dao from shining forth.

(Note: In this context, "Dao" refers to the fundamental cosmic principle, while "De" is its manifested expression; both "self-revealing" and "self-approving" represent attachment mentalities that cultivators must overcome.)

 直爲怨府人所不堪衆毁日聞故難彰著  故云自是者不彰 自伐者無功  䟽夫謙者德之柄讓者禮之文苟失斯道  無從而可况自專固伐取欲以求功不讓  則爭功斯濫矣故云自伐者無功 自矜者不長  䟽盛德若愚昔賢通議矜衒名器醜行則  多人所鄙薄坐招嗤誚自矜雖欲求益胥  怨物不推長故云自矜不長 其於道也曰餘食贅行  䟽餘食者殘餘之食贅行者疣贅之行也  殘餘食之穢疣贅身之病以此自見自是  等行其於道而論之如殘餘疣贅人所共  惡也謂之贅行者爲自見自是等爲德行  之疣贅故云贅行春秋曰人將不食吾餘  莊子曰附疣懸贅出乎形而侈於性 物或惡之故有道者不處  䟽此自見自是等旣若餘食贅行凡物尚  或惡之而不爲故有道之君子不處身於  此事矣    有物混成章第二十五(前章明自見/自是於道爲)    (餘食贅行末云有道不處此章明曰/大三逝贊道乃先天混成終令法道)    (自然首標有物混成六句將明妙本/之絶趣物被其功次云吾不知下六)    (句欲表强名之由緒名亦不可得故/道下六句示知四大之生育申戒人)    (君之法下至終篇教以/法道自然無爲清淨耳) 有物混成先天地生  䟽有物者妙物也即虚極妙本也將欲申  明强名所由不可即此道故云有物爾言
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist opposition to self-promotion and contentious striving, employing vivid metaphors to illustrate the dangers of such behaviors.

Those who constantly consider themselves infallible ultimately fail to gain recognition. Those who delight in self-praise never achieve true merit. Just as humility forms the foundation of virtue (De) and yielding manifests true propriety, losing these fundamental principles of the Dao renders all endeavors fruitless. Moreover, those who stubbornly cling to their own views and compete for credit only provoke needless conflict. Hence, those who boast of their achievements actually possess no real accomplishment.

The arrogant and self-satisfied likewise struggle to maintain their advantages. As the ancients said, "Perfect virtue (De) appears as foolishness" – truly virtuous individuals seem dull to ordinary eyes. Flaunting fame and status constitutes disgraceful behavior that invites public scorn and ridicule. Though the proud seek greater gains, they only incur resentment rather than genuine respect.

From the perspective of the Dao, such behaviors resemble leftover scraps of food or unsightly tumors. Leftovers provoke disgust, while tumors represent bodily dysfunction. Similarly, self-display and self-righteousness appear to Daoist practitioners as universally detestable dregs and excrescences. The Spring and Autumn Annals state: "People wouldn't even eat my leftovers," while Zhuangzi observes: "Though tumors grow on the body, they violate natural principles." Even ordinary people despise such things – how much more would genuine Dao adepts reject them?

The subsequent twenty-fifth chapter discusses the primordial state of the Dao: Before heaven and earth took form, there existed an undifferentiated unity (called the "marvelous origin" or "utmost emptiness"). This existence defies ordinary conceptualization and can only reluctantly be termed "something." This reveals the profound nature of the Dao – it precedes all things and serves as the generative source of all existence.

 此妙物混然而成含孕衆象尋其生化乃  在天地之先故云先天地生爾 寂兮寥兮獨立而不改周行而不殆  䟽寂寥者嘆有物之體寂寥虚靜妙本湛  然故獨立而不移改物感必應應用無心  遍於群有故周行而不危殆 可以爲天下母  䟽妙本生化遍於群有群有之物無非匠  成萬物彼其茂養之德故可以爲天下母  爾母以茂養爲義也 吾不知其名字之曰道强爲之名曰大  䟽字者表其德名者定其體老君云妙本  生化沖用莫窮寂寥虚靜不可定其形狀  先天地生難以言其氏族故吾不知其名  但見其大通於物將欲表其本然之德故  字之曰道見其包含無外將欲定其至無  之體故强名曰大凡物先名而後字者以  其自小而成大以道先字而後名者是以  從本而降迹爾 大曰逝逝曰遠遠曰返  䟽夫滯於一方者非天下之至通也故天  職生覆而不能形載地職形載而不能生  覆唯妙本之用用無定方雖則强名曰大  而復不離於大自大而求之則逝而往矣  自往而求之則遠不及矣自遠而求之則  復返在人身心故曰遠曰返莊子曰夫道  於大不終於細不遺 故道大天大地大王亦大  䟽因强名曰大而舉所以次大者故天能  顚玄在上垂覆萬物地能寧靜於下厚載  萬物王能清靜無爲而化萬物此三大也
Interpretation

This passage presents Emperor Xuanzong of Tang's commentary on the "There was something formless yet complete" chapter of the Daode Jing, offering a modern interpretation of the characteristics and functions of the Dao.

That mysterious origin (the wondrous foundation) exists as an undifferentiated whole, encompassing all phenomena. Tracing its process of generation and transformation, we find it existed even before heaven and earth took form, hence the description "it existed before heaven and earth." Silent and empty (in profound stillness), it stands alone and never changes, circulating endlessly without exhaustion. The term "profound stillness" here praises this fundamental state—serene and pure, thus able to remain independent and unchanging. Though it responds to all things, it does so naturally; though it pervades all existence, it never falls into peril.

It can be considered the mother of all under heaven (天下母), for this wondrous origin gives birth to and transforms the myriad things—all that exists is its creation. Like a mother nourishing her children, it sustains all things, hence the designation "mother of all under heaven." Here, "mother" signifies its nourishing function.

Laozi says we do not know its name, so we reluctantly call it the Dao (the Way), and further reluctantly describe it as "great." The "designation" here refers to describing its De (Virtue/Power), while the "name" defines its essence. This wondrous origin generates and transforms endlessly—serene and formless, existing before heaven and earth—making it difficult to define with names. Observing how it permeates all things, we use "Dao" to describe its nature; seeing how it embraces everything, we reluctantly call it "great" to characterize its essence. Ordinary things first have names and then designations, progressing from small to great, but the Dao first has a designation and then a name, revealing traces from its origin.

To call it "great" implies extension (passing), extension leads to distance (far-reaching), and distance ultimately returns (reversal). To be confined to one aspect is not true penetration. Just as heaven covers and nurtures but cannot support, and earth supports but cannot cover and nurture. Only this wondrous origin functions without fixed methods—though we reluctantly call it "great," it is not limited to "greatness." Pursuing it through "greatness" leads to extension, extension to distance, and distance circles back to the human body and mind. Thus, the Zhuangzi says the Dao is inexhaustible in the vast and omits nothing in the minute.

Therefore, the Dao is great, heaven is great, earth is great, and the king is also great. Having reluctantly called it "great," we proceed to list other great things: heaven hangs high above and covers all things, earth lies still below and supports all things, and the king governs with clarity and Wuwei (non-action), teaching all things—these are the "three greats."

 吾道一以貫之矣 域中有四大而王居其一焉  䟽域中者限域也今玄域中之大道不只  在域中若云約所見而言則天地自爲限  域道亦不在域中矣夫惟寄語以申玄理  亦不必曲生異義存文以防疑難衆説皆  未盡通今明域者名也以名爲體以爲物  無名外之體故曰域中若舉道則道在其  中矣舉天名則天無遺體矣故云域中即  有名之中有此四大云而王居一者王爲  人靈之首有道則萬物被其德無道則天  地蒙其害故特標而王居一欲令法道自  然 人法地地法天天法道道法自然  䟽人謂王者也所以云人者謂人能法天  地生成法道清靜則天下歸往是以爲王  若不然則物無所歸往故稱人以戒爾爲  王者當法地安靜因其安靜又當法天生  化功被物矣又當法道清靜無爲忘功於  物令物自化人君能爾即合道法自然言  道之爲法自然非復倣自然也若如惑者  之難以道法效於自然是則域中有五大  非四大也又引西昇經云虚無生自然自  然生道則以道爲虚無之孫自然之子妄  生先後之義以定尊卑之目塞源拔本倒  置何深且嘗試論曰虚無者妙本之體體  非有物故曰虚無自然者妙本之性性非  造作故曰自然道者妙本之功用所謂强  名無非通生故謂之道幻體用名即謂之
Interpretation

This passage presents Emperor Xuanzong of Tang's commentary on core concepts from the Daode Jing such as "the Dao follows what is natural" (Dao fa ziran). In modern terms, it can be understood as follows:

The so-called "bounded realm" (域中) refers to a delimited scope. But the Dao is profoundly mysterious and boundless, not confined to any particular region. From our limited perspective, heaven and earth may appear to set boundaries, yet the Dao actually transcends such limitations. The concept of "bounded realm" is employed here to elucidate profound principles—there's no need to deliberately seek novelty for its own sake.

Essentially, "bounded realm" is a conceptual designation referring to the domain where all named and manifest phenomena exist. Within this realm are the "Four Greats" (四大)—the Dao, heaven, earth, and the sovereign. Among these, the ruler as the pinnacle of sentient beings can benefit all things when following the Dao, while losing the Dao brings calamity to heaven and earth. Thus, the special emphasis on the sovereign as one of the Four Greats serves as a warning to rulers to emulate the Dao's natural non-action (Wuwei).

The commentary then explains "humans emulate earth, earth emulates heaven, heaven emulates the Dao, and the Dao follows what is natural": Here "humans" specifically refers to rulers. The sovereign should emulate earth's tranquility and substantiality, then progress to emulate heaven's nurturing function, ultimately embodying the Dao's serene non-action to let all things develop naturally. Achieving this constitutes genuine alignment with "the Dao follows what is natural." Importantly, "following what is natural" doesn't mean the Dao imitates nature—rather, the Dao itself is the manifestation of naturalness.

The text refutes certain misunderstandings: Some mistakenly believe "the Dao follows what is natural" separates the Dao from nature, which would create "Five Greats" instead of four. Others cite the Xisheng Jing claiming "emptiness gives birth to naturalness, naturalness gives birth to the Dao"—this portrayal of the Dao as "grandchild of emptiness and child of nature," artificially establishing hierarchy and sequence, completely inverts the fundamental reality. In truth:

  • Emptiness (虚无) is the Dao's essence—formless and imageless, thus called emptiness
  • Naturalness (自然) is the Dao's inherent nature—uncontrived, thus called natural
  • The term "Dao" is a provisional designation for its generative function

These three are actually different aspects of the same essence and should not be forcibly separated.

 虚無自然道爾尋其所以即一妙本復何  所相倣法乎則知惑者之難不詣夫玄鍵  矣    重爲輕根章第二十六(前章舉域中/稱大終令法)    (道自然此章明重靜爲君以戒身輕/天下首兩句標宗以示義次兩句舉)    (喻以即明又四句傷人君之/失道末兩句述輕躁以爲戒) 重爲輕根靜爲躁君  䟽根本也草木花葉之花葉輕花葉禀根  蒂而生則根蒂躁旣重爲本故曰重爲輕  根夫重則靜輕則躁躁則靜輕者根則靜  爲躁者君矣是知重有制輕之功靜有持  躁之力故權重則屬鼻之纊斯舉心靜則  朵頤之求自息 是以君子終日行不離輜重  䟽君子者謂人主也言其志可以君人子  物故云君子輜屏車也重者是輕者原也  此舉喻也言人君常守重靜猶如所爲之  不離輜重行者若失輜重則無所取給必  遭凍餒人君若好輕躁則臣下離散必生  禍患故云終日行不離輜重 雖有榮觀燕處超然  䟽夫人君好重靜則百姓不煩勞若登高  臺泛深池撞鐘舞女以爲榮觀則人力凋  盡亂亡斯作故戒云雖有榮觀當須燕爾  安處超然遠離而不顧也 奈何萬乗之主而以身輕天下  䟽天子提封百萬井出賦六十四萬井出  戎馬百萬匹兵車萬乗故云萬乗之主奈  何者傷嘆之辭也天下者大寳之位也夫
Interpretation

The Dao (the Way) of emptiness and natural spontaneity is itself the most fundamental and profound essence, requiring no deliberate imitation of external forms. Those who remain perplexed fail to grasp this crucial mystery.

Chapter 26 illustrates fundamental principles through contrast: The substantial serves as the foundation of the insubstantial, and stillness governs agitation. Just as the light flowers and leaves of plants all depend on their substantial roots to grow, substantiality restrains frivolity while stillness masters restlessness. Like a heavy steelyard weight causing the suspended thread to hang straight, or a tranquil mind naturally curbing gluttonous desires ("duoyi"), these demonstrate inherent principles.

Here the "noble man" (junzi) symbolizes the ruler. A sovereign should maintain substantiality and stillness as consistently as an army depends on its supply wagons. Abandoning these wagons leaves soldiers starving and freezing; similarly, a ruler's recklessness and agitation cause subjects to rebel, inevitably bringing calamity.

Even when possessing magnificent towers ("rongguan"), the ruler should remain detached like swallows in their nests. Indulging in lofty terraces, deep pools, bell-and-drum music, or song-and-dance extravagance only exhausts the people's strength and invites chaos.

Alas! Why should the ruler of "ten thousand chariots" (symbolizing vast military power) treat the realm with such frivolity? This "ten thousand chariots" refers to the Son of Heaven's dominion over a million well-fields (ancient land units) capable of mobilizing vast armies. The realm is a position of supreme value - the ruler's careless conduct is truly lamentable.

 萬乗之主四海必同當令子孫千億本枝  百代善建則無爲偃化善抱則有截歸仁  奈何承此重器耽樂是從以身充欲淪胥  以敗是以一身之欲而輕大寳之位甚可  傷嘆故曰奈何 輕則失臣躁則失君  䟽夫君多輕易必煩擾煩擾則人散誰與  爲臣故云輕則失臣此戒人君也爲人臣  者當量能受爵無速官謗若矯迹干禄飾  詐祈榮躁求若斯禍敗尋至坐招竄殛焉  得事君故云躁則失君此申戒人臣也 唐
Interpretation

This passage contains Emperor Xuanzong of Tang's commentary on the Daode Jing, primarily discussing the proper relationship between rulers and ministers.

For rulers, as sovereigns commanding ten thousand chariots and governing the four seas, they should ensure their descendants endure for countless generations, establishing a firm foundation that remains unshaken for a hundred ages. Those skilled in building achievements govern the people through wuwei (non-action, aligning with the natural order without force), while those adept at preservation ensure the world returns to benevolence and virtue (De). Yet lamentably, some rulers indulge in pleasure, surrendering to selfish desires, ultimately leading to the collapse of their states. To satisfy personal cravings while disregarding the supreme dignity of rulership is truly pitiable and regrettable.

The scripture states: If a ruler acts rashly, he will lose his ministers; if a minister is hasty and reckless, he will lose his sovereign. Specifically, if a ruler frequently acts impulsively, issuing erratic decrees, it inevitably creates administrative chaos. The people and officials will scatter, with none willing to assist—hence the warning that "rashness loses ministers." This admonishes rulers.

For ministers, they should accept official positions and ranks according to their capacity, avoiding reckless ambition that invites criticism. If one resorts to pretense to secure stipends or employs deceit to seek glory, such impatient grasping will swiftly bring calamity, ultimately leading to exile or execution—how then could they serve their sovereign? Thus, it is said, "haste loses the ruler." This admonishes ministers.

This commentary reflects the Daoist political philosophy of "governing through wuwei," emphasizing that rulers must remain steady and ministers must know their place. Only when both ruler and minister abide by their proper roles can the state endure in lasting peace.

玄宗御製道德眞經䟽卷之三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0060); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →