中文 · EN

《宋徽宗道德真經解義》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 3 / 10 9,200 characters

About this page. The original text of 《宋徽宗道德真經解義》 Vol. 3 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 18 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《宋徽宗道德真經解義》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

宋徽宗道德眞經解義卷之三良三    登仩郎臣章安撰義  道經    寵辱章第十三 寵辱若驚貴大患若身  御注曰寵者在下貴者在上居寵而以爲  榮則辱矣處貴而以爲利則患莫大焉以  富爲是者不能辭禄以顯爲是者不能辭  名親權者不能與人柄操之則慄捨之則  悲兹寵辱所以若驚歟慘怛之疾恬愉之  安時集於體怵迫之恐欣懽之喜交溺於  心兹大患所以若身歟  臣義曰見寵於人而心爲之榮辱孰甚焉  處貴於時而己爲之利患莫大焉寵辱本  乎得失得失之來心之驚也驚於得失而  爲榮辱故曰若驚以彼之貴爲我之利固  而居之反累其心同乎有爲之患而不能  自脱  何謂寵辱寵爲下  御注曰龍之爲物變化自如不可制畜可  豢養焉則志於豢養有辱之道古之善爲  士者三旌之位不足易其介萬鐘之禄不  足遷其守居寵而思危在福而若沖則何  辱之有貪天位也慕天禄也知進而不知  退知得而不知喪則人賤之矣故受寵於  人則爲下之道  臣義曰以彼之寵爲榮則受寵者所爲辱  此爲下之道也况知進不知退知得不知  喪此所以履憂患而貽身災人得而賤之  豈不爲下 得之若驚失之若驚是謂寵辱若驚  御注曰軒冕在身非性命之理也物之儻  來寄也寄之來不可拒故至人不以得爲
Interpretation

In his commentary on Chapter 13 of the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue), Emperor Huizong of Song explains the profound meaning behind the phrase "favor and disgrace seem alarming." The reason why favor and disgrace startle people lies in their excessive attachment to external honor and humiliation. If one becomes smug upon receiving favor from superiors, this itself constitutes disgrace; if those in high positions only seek personal gain, they will invite great calamity.

Those who covet wealth and status cannot bear to relinquish their salaries, those who pursue fame cannot let go of their reputation, and those obsessed with power refuse to share it with others. When they gain something, they tremble with anxiety; when they lose it, they are overwhelmed with grief. This is why favor and disgrace unsettle the mind. Pain and pleasure alternate, fear and delight entangle endlessly—these afflictions cling to one like an incurable illness.

In essence, both "favor" and "disgrace" are manifestations of a debased state. Just as a dragon, meant to roam freely, loses its dignity when caged, the true sages of antiquity remained unshaken in their integrity even when offered high rank and generous emoluments. Those in elevated positions should remain mindful of danger; those enjoying blessings should maintain humility—only then can they avoid disgrace. Those who cling to power, advancing without knowing when to retreat, will ultimately be scorned by others.

Glory and riches are like things temporarily entrusted to the body—they are not the true meaning of life. Gaining them is no cause for joy, nor is losing them a reason for sorrow. This is the true lesson behind "favor and disgrace seem alarming." Those who understand this principle will not let external judgments disturb their inner peace.

 悦其去不可圉故至人不以失爲憂今寄  去則不樂受則喜之是得失累乎心能勿  驚乎柳下惠爲士師三黜而不去正考父  三命循墻而走則異於是  臣義曰寵辱生於得失得失至而心爲之  累神爲之驚是驚於得失而爲寵辱也無  得則無失無寵則無辱忘懷於得失則何  所驚也不驚則烏有所謂寵辱 何謂貴大患若身  御注曰據利勢擅賞罰作福威天下畏之  如神明尊之如上帝可謂貴矣聖人則不  以貴自累故能長富貴而無患譬如人身  墮肢體黜聰明離形去智同於大通則無  入而不自得也世之人以物易性故累物  而不能忘勢以形累心故喪心而不能忘  形其患大矣  臣義曰以貴自累者忘其自貴而有彼之  貴孰免於患惟聖人無我故履至貴而未  始以貴自累此所以長守貴而無人道之  患涉於有我則有身之患心嚮於貴而心  爲之役身榮於貴而身爲之累患之大也 吾所以有大患者爲吾有身及吾無身吾有 何患  御注曰人之生也百骸九竅五藏六府賅  而存焉吾誰與爲親認而有之皆惑也體  道者解乎此故孔子曰朝聞道夕死可矣  孟子曰夭壽不貳顔子曰回坐忘矣夫死  生亦大矣而無變于己況得喪禍福之所  介乎此古之至人所以不以利累形不以  形累心視萬物與我將擇焉而不可得則
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist philosophy of transcending worldly concerns of gain and loss, favor and disgrace, nobility and baseness.

It begins with the examples of Liuxia Hui (a virtuous scholar of Lu during the Spring and Autumn period) and Zheng Kaofu (a wise minister of the Shang dynasty), illustrating how true sages remain undisturbed by material gains or losses. Ordinary people rejoice at gains and grieve over losses, becoming trapped by these fluctuations. By relinquishing attachment to such concerns, one naturally rises above the duality of favor and disgrace.

The text then explains the meaning of "valuing great calamity as one's own body": worldly people chase power and status, wielding authority over rewards and punishments to command universal awe. While this appears noble, such "nobility" ultimately becomes a burden. Sages remain unbound by position, thus maintaining true nobility without inviting misfortune. This mirrors the practitioner's path of "discarding limbs and abandoning cleverness" (freeing oneself from bodily attachments and cunning intellect) to achieve "union with the great Dao (Tong yu da tong)."

The passage observes that those obsessed with external nobility lose genuine nobility. Only sages attain the state of "no-self" (wuwo), remaining unburdened even in high positions. Ordinary people, clinging to "having self," inevitably invite anxieties.

Finally, it cites Confucius's "hearing the Dao (Dao) in the morning, one could die content in the evening," Mencius's "neither early death nor long life alters one's resolve," and Yan Hui's "sitting in forgetfulness" (zuowang), demonstrating how those who embody the Dao transcend life and death—let alone trivial matters like gain/loss or fortune/misfortune. The ancient perfected ones (zhiren) remained untroubled by profit or physical form because they realized the fundamental unity of all things with themselves.

 吾身非吾有也上與造物者遊下與外死  生齊終始者爲友吾有何患且寵者世所  榮也而以爲辱貴者人所樂也而以爲患  蓋外物之不可恃也理固然矣誠能有之  以無有則雖寵而不辱雖貴而無患伊尹  之不以寵利居成功堯之不以位爲樂幾  是已  臣義曰有吾故有身有身故有患無身則  吾固無矣吾且不有復有何患形不累於  物而至於形復乎無形心不累於形而至  於心復乎無心是以上與造物者遊而吾  且無身矣下與外生死齊終始者爲友而  有何患視寵爲辱履貴知患則寵貴在彼  夫復何恃 故貴以身爲天下若可寄天下愛以身爲天 下若可託天下  御注曰天下大器也非道莫運天下神器  也非道莫守聖人體道故在宥天下天下  樂推而不厭其次則知貴其身而不自賤  以役於物者若可寄而已知愛其身而不  自賤以困於物者若可託而已故曰道之  眞以治身緒餘以爲國家土苴以治天下  世俗之君子乃危身棄生以殉物豈不悲  夫  臣義曰聖人體道在天下其靜也以道爲  之守其動也以道爲之運豈復以身任天  下之事爲而反以爲累乎天下樂推而不  厭復有何患苟未及乎此知以道貴其身  而不失己於茍賤之地則知自貴矣故可  以受天下之寄知以道愛其身而不徇物
Interpretation

This passage expounds profound Daoist insights on cultivating body-mind and proper conduct in the world.

It begins with the proposition that "this body is not truly mine." The truly awakened person roams above with the Creator (referring to the Great Dao) and associates below with those who have transcended life-death and seen through beginnings-endings - what worries could remain? Ordinary people consider favor as honor, but the enlightened regard it as shame; common folk take wealth as happiness, while sages recognize it as potential calamity. For all external things are unreliable - this is the principle of nature. If one can maintain an attitude of "non-possession" toward what they have, then neither favor brings shame nor high position invites disaster. The ancient sage minister Yi Yin didn't claim merit for favors received, and Emperor Yao found no pleasure in rulership - this exemplifies such realization.

It further explains: Only through attachment to "self" does the notion of body arise, and with bodily attachment comes anxiety. If one forgets the self to the point where even "I" ceases to exist, what worries remain? When form is no longer burdened by external things, it returns to its formless authenticity; when mind is no longer constrained by physicality, it returns to its thoughtless natural state. Thus when roaming with the Creator above, one has already forgotten oneself; when befriending those beyond life-death below, worries naturally vanish. To regard favor as shame and recognize the hidden dangers in wealth means understanding that glory and riches are external - what is there to depend upon?

The discourse then turns to governing the world: The world is a sacred vessel that can only be operated and preserved by following the Dao. Sages (those who have attained the Dao) unite with the Dao, thus governing through wuwei (non-action), with all people gladly supporting them without weariness. Those of lesser attainment who know to value themselves without being enslaved by external things may be temporarily entrusted with the world; those who understand self-care without being trapped by externals may be provisionally delegated governance. Therefore, the true essence of the Dao is for cultivating one's person; its remainder serves for ordering states; its dregs alone are used for pacifying the world. Yet worldly people harm their bodies and abandon their lives chasing externals - is this not lamentable?

Finally it emphasizes: Sages govern the world through the Great Dao - in stillness they use the Dao as protection, in movement they follow the Dao as guide. How could they be burdened by worldly affairs? For those who cannot reach this state, at least know to value yourself through the Dao, never degrading yourself to base conditions - only then can you be called truly self-valuing and worthy of the world's trust. To understand self-care through the Dao without sacrificing yourself for externals - this is genuine wisdom.

 於自棄之域則知自愛矣故可以受天下  之託天下之寄託本乎道也知貴愛以身  雖不及乎體道之全然知以道自貴自愛  故曰若可寄託    視之不見章第十四 視之不見名曰夷  御注曰目主視視以辨物夷則平而無辨  非視所及故名曰夷太易未見氣是已  臣義曰視則用明見則有物以我之明見  彼之物目力所及爾萬法一致物我玄同  非視所及復何所見 聽之不聞名曰希  御注曰耳主聽聽以察物希則概而有間  非聽所聞故名曰希大音希聲是已  臣義曰聲之所起物之所感旣屬諸有故  可聽可聞無聲之中獨聞和焉故曰大音  希聲希聲獨聞則概而有間矣故曰希 摶之不得名曰微  御注曰微乎微乎至於無形孰得而摶之  大象無形是已  臣義曰物之可摶而得者麗乎形器無物  之可摶欲摶而不得所謂大象者如此無  形之中獨見有焉故曰微 此三者不可致詰故混而爲一  御注曰太易未判孰分高下大音希聲孰  辨清濁大象無形孰爲巨細目無所用其  明耳無所施其聰形無所竭其力道之全  體於是乎在窮之不可究探之不可得也  氣形質具而未相離故混而爲一雖然旣  已爲一矣且得無言乎  臣義曰視之聽之摶之則非無也不見不  聞不得則非有也曰夷曰希曰微則若有
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Daoist description of the ineffable characteristics of the Dao (the Way). The eyes look but cannot see it—this is called "Yi" (meaning formless plainness). Emperor Huizong of Song explains that while eyes are meant for seeing, "Yi" represents a state of indistinguishable flatness beyond visual perception, akin to the primordial "Great Change" (Taiyi) stage of the cosmos when even Qi (vital energy) had yet to take form.

The ears listen but cannot hear it—this is called "Xi" (meaning rare and faint). Though sound arises from physical vibrations, "Xi" denotes an intermittent, barely perceptible state, resembling the realm of "the greatest sound is soundless." The true harmony of the supreme Dao can only be apprehended within silence.

The hands grasp but cannot hold it—this is called "Wei" (meaning subtle intangibility). What can be grasped must have form, yet the Dao is like "the greatest form is formless"—manifesting true existence precisely through formlessness.

These three attributes (Yi, Xi, Wei) transcend complete verbal description and are collectively termed "the One." In the primordial chaos before creation, when Qi, form, and substance remained undifferentiated—with no distinction between high and low, pure and turbid, large and small—this was the state where eyes couldn't see, ears couldn't hear, and hands couldn't grasp, yet the complete Dao resided therein. Though called "the One," it isn't absolute nothingness; neither being nor non-being, it abides in a state of profound mystery.

 若無也若有若無故不可以一詰故混而  無間同有於無同無於有所謂混一如此 其上不皦其下不昧  御注曰形而上者陰陽不測幽而難知兹  謂至神故不皦皦言明也形而下者一陰  一陽辨而有數兹謂至道故不昧昧言幽  也易曰神而明之存乎其人  臣義曰涉於形器者有陰陽之辨故上皦  下昧理之固然至神之所妙故上不知其  皦至道之所行故下不知其昧不皦不昧  不離於一也 繩繩兮不可名復歸於無物  御注曰道之體若晝夜之有經而莫測其  幽明之故豈貌象聲色可得而形容乎故  復歸於無物  臣義曰一者道之經也合有無上下而㝠  於一則道之不可名也繩則有所合而爲  之繩繩言其不已也一之又一又玄之義  復乎未始有物故曰復歸於無物 是謂無狀之狀無物之象是謂恍惚  御注曰無狀之狀無物之象恍兮惚其中  有物惚兮恍其中有象猶如太虚含蓄萬  象而不覩其端倪猶如一性靈智自若而  莫究其運用謂之有而非有謂之無而非  無若日月之去人遠矣以鑑燧求焉而水  火自至水火果何在哉無狀之狀無物之  象亦猶是也  臣義曰無狀之狀有而不見無物之象有  而不可得旣復歸於無物則未始有物也  無狀之狀無物之象則又非無物也謂之  有而非有謂之無而非無恍惚之謂也
Interpretation

This passage explores the profound nature of the Dao (the Way), the core concept of Daoism referring to the cosmic origin and governing principle. The Dao is neither pure being nor pure non-being, but exists in a state of undifferentiated unity.

From the metaphysical perspective (transcending the material realm), the Dao is as unfathomable as the transformations of Yin-Yang—deep and obscure, hence described as "not bright" (不皦). Viewed through the physical lens, though we can discern the shifts of Yin-Yang, the essence of the Dao remains profoundly elusive (不昧). As the Yijing (Book of Changes) states: the divine and luminous principle actually resides within the human self.

The substance of the Dao resembles the cyclical rhythm of day and night—it cannot be captured through form or sound, ultimately returning to the state of "no-thing." Here, the "One" refers to the fundamental law of the Dao, which integrates being and non-being, above and below, in a mystery so profound it defies naming. "Unbroken continuity" (绳绳) describes the Dao’s ceaseless movement, yet it circles back to its original emptiness.

This state may be called "the formless form, the imageless image"—what is termed "huanghu" (恍惚, the ineffable). Like the primordial void (Taixu) that contains all phenomena yet has no visible boundary, or like the natural presence of human spiritual wisdom that remains intangible. To say it exists yields no tangible substance; to say it does not exist ignores its real effects. Just as the sun and moon are distant from humans, yet fire can be drawn with a mirror and light focused with bronze—where, then, do water and fire truly reside? Such is the principle of "the formless form, the imageless image."

Though it returns to the "no-thing" of the primordial state, this is not absolute nothingness. To call it being reveals no form; to call it non-being acknowledges its presence—this is the profound meaning of "huanghu." This state transcends the duality of being and non-being, embodying the mysterious essence of the Dao.

迎之不見其首隨之不見其後  御注曰其始無首其卒無尾故迎之隨之  有不得而見焉  臣義曰麗乎出入始終之機則有首尾前  後之辨道復乎無體孰有首尾道藏乎無  物孰有前後其來也不可迎其去也不可  隨孰知其始孰知其終 執古之道以御今之有能知古始是謂道紀  御注曰一陰一陽之謂道師天而無地者  或蔽於道之動而憑其强陽師陰而無陽  者或溺於道之靜而止於枯槁爲我者廢  仁爲人者廢義豈古之道哉古之道不可  致詰而非有是謂恍惚而非無執之以御  世則變通以盡利鼓舞以盡神而無不可  者道之大常無易於此所謂自古以固存  者歟故曰能知古始是謂道紀  臣義曰古之道一而已執一以爲用則天  下之有可得而御謂之今者以際於事之  時言之謂之古者以未離乎一之時言之  能知古始者知道之一復乎無紀無紀之  紀道之太常故曰道紀    古之善爲士章第十五 古之善爲士者微妙玄通深不可識  御注曰古之士與今之士異矣善爲士則  與不善爲士者異矣故微則與道爲一妙  則與神同體玄有以配天通有以兆聖而  藏用之深至於不可測究書曰道心惟微  則微者道也易曰神也者妙萬物而爲言  則妙者神也易曰天玄而地黄則玄者天  之色傳曰事無不通之謂聖則通者聖之
Interpretation

The Dao (the fundamental principle of the universe) has no concrete form—one cannot perceive its beginning nor trace its end. Looking ahead, you won't see its head; following behind, you won't find its tail. This is because the Dao itself has neither origin nor conclusion.

The accomplished adepts (shi) of ancient times could grasp this eternal and unchanging Dao to respond to contemporary affairs. Only by truly understanding the source of the Dao can one grasp its fundamental order (Daoji). The Dao encompasses both Yin and Yang. If one only emulates Heaven while neglecting Earth, they will become fixated on the Dao’s movement and transformation. If one only follows Yin while disregarding Yang, they will stagnate in the Dao’s stillness. Selfish attachment leads to the abandonment of benevolence, while excessive focus on others leads to the neglect of righteousness—neither represents the true ancient Dao. The ancient Dao cannot be fully expressed in words; it appears indistinct yet truly exists. By mastering this root principle, one can adapt flexibly to the changes of the world.

The true sages (shan wei shi zhe) of antiquity attained a state so subtle and profound, so attuned to the mysteries, that ordinary people could scarcely comprehend it. In their finest details, they merged with the Dao; in their most refined aspects, they resonated with the divine (Shen); in their most arcane depths, they matched Heaven; in their most penetrating wisdom, they manifested sagely virtue (De). This deeply concealed cultivation reached an unfathomable level. As the Book of Documents states, "The heart of the Dao is exquisitely subtle"; the Book of Changes says, "The divine (Shen) mysteriously transforms all things"; the Book of Changes also declares, "Heaven is profound, Earth is vast"; and the Zuo Commentary remarks, "The sage comprehends all without obstruction"—all these describe this supreme state.

(Note: "Daoji" refers to the fundamental order of the Dao; "shi" denotes accomplished adepts; "The heart of the Dao is exquisitely subtle" comes from the Book of Documents, meaning the essence of the Dao is profoundly refined; "The divine mysteriously transforms all things" is from the Book of Changes, describing the wondrous workings of the divine in creation; "Heaven is profound, Earth is vast" originates from the Book of Changes, illustrating the essential characteristics of Heaven and Earth.)

 事水之深者可測也穴之深者可究也古  之善爲士者微妙玄通名實不入而機發  於踵其藏深矣不可測究列御寇居鄭圃  四十年人無識者老子謂孔子曰良賈深  藏若虚君子盛德容貌若愚其謂是歟  臣義曰古者物之初始道未離乎一也繼  道者善則善者道之出也事道者士則士  者道之任也今則嚮於事物之時士亦以  事爲之任爾此古之士所以與今之士異  也惟其出乎古始以善繼道可以復道以  身任道可以載道故能微能妙能玄能通  深不可識也其微與道爲一者言道之深  也其妙與神同體者言神之深也配天之  玄而任其自然造理之深也兆聖之通而  達於玄爲適事之深也其機淺者俄而可  度也其藏深者孰可識哉 夫惟不可識故强爲之容  御注曰天之高不可俄而度也地之厚不  可俄而測也曰圓以覆曰方以載者擬諸  其容而已强爲之容豈能眞索其至  臣義曰深不可識則不容聲矣孰可擬議  强爲之容故有所竊比若川至乎若濁者  是也 豫兮若冬涉川猶兮若畏四鄰  御注曰豫者圖患於未然猶者致疑於已  事古之體道者以内游爲務不以通物爲  樂恐懼修省不得已而後應若冬涉川守  而不失已若畏四鄰易所謂以此齋戒者  是也  臣義曰有物採之迫而後應非樂於通物
Interpretation

This passage contrasts the profound concealment of ancient Daoist practitioners with modern attitudes.

The ancient masters who excelled in cultivating the Dao (Dao) possessed subtle and mysterious attainments, neither chasing fame nor material gain. Their inner wisdom arose naturally from the depths of their being ("the mechanism emerges from the heels"), so deeply concealed that ordinary people could not fathom them. Take, for example, Lie Yukou (Liezi), who lived in obscurity in the state of Zheng for forty years without anyone recognizing his true nature. Similarly, Laozi once told Confucius, "A skilled merchant keeps his treasures hidden, while a man of great virtue (De) appears dull on the surface"—precisely illustrating this principle.

The author explains: Ancient cultivators were united with the Dao (Dao), inheriting its lineage with virtuous intent (Shanji Dao) and embodying its principles through action (Yi Shen Ren Dao). Thus, they attained a state of subtlety and profound communion. This depth manifests in several ways: the subtlety of merging with the Dao (Wei Yu Dao Wei Yi), the wondrous unity with the divine (Miao Yu Shen Tong Ti), the alignment with the mysteries of heaven (Pei Tian Zhi Xuan), and the foreshadowing of sagehood (Zhao Sheng Zhi Tong). Superficial things are easily grasped ("what is shallow can be measured in an instant"), but who can truly comprehend the depths of concealed cultivation?

Because such a state defies description, one can only approximate it through metaphor. Just as the heights of heaven and the depths of earth cannot be measured, people resort to phrases like "heaven is round, earth is square" to convey them. Daoist practitioners move through the world with caution, treading as carefully as crossing a winter river (Yu Xi Ruo Dong She Chuan) and remaining as vigilant as if wary of neighboring states (You Xi Ruo Wei Si Lin). They focus on inner refinement (Nei You Wei Wu), neither indulging in external pleasures nor losing their sense of reverence, engaging with the world only when necessity demands (Po Er Hou Ying).

 也先事而戒曰豫已事而畏曰猶冬涉者  言其不得已逡巡而進非所欲者也畏四  鄰者言其可畏之密邇於我而不相離戒  而不敢縱也 儼若容  御注曰語曰望之儼然記曰儼若思莊子  曰物無道正容以悟之使人之意也消全  德之人遠之則有望近之則不厭故其狀  義而不朋  臣義曰儼者端莊凝重之形容者變動不  一之貌以其莊重故記稱其若思以其不  一故莊子謂之正容儼若客形忘而容寂  也 涣若冰將釋  御注曰水凝而爲冰冰釋而爲水其實一  體蔽於執一者如水之凝通於大同者如  冰之釋易曰涣離也遺物離人而無所繫  較所以爲涣  臣義曰滯於形體則礙於有游於物初則  復於無遺物離人所以爲涣也若冰將釋  所以爲玄同也水凝爲冰釋復爲水不離  當體圓融會通 敦兮其若樸  御注曰敦者厚之至性本至厚如木之樸  未散爲器  臣義曰復性命之至厚故曰敦如木渾全  而未散於器故曰 樸曠兮其若谷  御注曰曠者廣之極心原無際如谷之虚  受而能應  臣義曰心復乎無心曠然同乎太虚廣之  極也如彼空谷能容能應 渾兮其若濁  御注曰不劌雕以爲廉不矯激以爲異渾  然而已故若濁與修身以明污者異矣  臣義曰物我混一同然無間若彼濁流藏  垢納污
Interpretation

This passage describes several virtuous states that Daoist cultivators should embody:

First, it discusses the mental attitudes of "yu" (precaution) and "you" (wariness). "Yu" means maintaining vigilance before events occur, while "you" refers to sustaining reverence after events unfold. Like someone cautiously crossing a winter river—not because they enjoy it, but because prudence is necessary. One should maintain this circumspect awareness as if constantly alert to one's surroundings, never allowing oneself to become unrestrained.

"Yan ruo rong" describes a dignified and composed demeanor. As Zhuangzi said, those with true virtue command respect from afar yet remain approachable up close. This solemnity isn't affected but naturally radiates calm composure.

"Huan ruo bing jiang shi" speaks of transcending attachments. Water freezing into ice or melting back into water remains fundamentally the same. Those bound by attachments resemble congealed ice, while awakened individuals flow like thawing water. One should release worldly entanglements like ice on the verge of melting.

"Dun xi qi ruo pu" portrays innate simplicity and genuineness. Like uncarved wood retaining its natural, unadorned texture, cultivators should return to this uncontrived, authentic state.

"Kuang xi qi ruo gu" depicts vast, open-mindedness. One's heart-mind should be as boundless as an empty valley—capable of embracing all things while remaining responsive to change. This represents unity with the emptiness of heaven and earth.

"Hun xi qi ruo zhuo" describes complete harmony with all existence. Without ostentatiously proclaiming purity or deliberately setting oneself apart, one merges with all things like turbid flowing water. Unlike those who pretentiously claim superiority, this represents true integration with the myriad beings.

孰能濁以靜之徐清孰能安以動之徐生  御注曰有道之士即動而靜時騁而要其  宿定而能應至無而供其求故靜之徐清  而物莫能濁動之徐生而物莫能安易曰  來徐徐徐者安行而自適之意至人之用  心非以靜止爲善而有意於靜非以生出  爲功而有爲於生也因其固然付之自爾  而無怵迫之情遑遽之勞焉故曰徐靜之  徐清萬物無足以撓其心故孰能濁動之  徐生萬物無足以系其慮故孰能安安有  止之意爲物所係則止矣豈能應物而不  傷  臣義曰靜者非能動而之靜而動未嘗不  靜也動者非離靜而之動而靜未嘗不動  也動靜兩得者道在於事也故古之事道  者其動也濁而不離乎靜故徐自清也而  物莫能濁其靜也安而未始不動故徐自  生也而物莫能安安有止意止於物則非  所謂變動不居也 保此道者不欲盈  御注曰有積也故不足無藏也故有餘至  人無積亦虚而已保此道而以天下之美  爲盡在己者亦已小矣故不欲盈經曰大  白若辱盛德若不足  臣義曰事道者忘心於道苟有而矜之雖  有存焉鮮矣故不欲盈也盈者矜其有而  自滿矣滿則覆理之必然也其能保乎 夫惟不盈故能敝不新成  御注曰有敝故有新有成故有壞新故相  代如彼四時成壞相因如彼萬物自道而
Interpretation

Who can be like turbid water that gradually clears when allowed to settle? Who can maintain stability while gradually coming to life through movement?

Emperor Huizong of Song explains: Those who have truly attained the Dao (the Way) preserve inner stillness even in action, appearing unrestrained yet inwardly restrained. Their minds remain tranquil while responding to endless changes, seemingly empty yet perfectly sufficient. Thus when settling, they clarify naturally—no external disturbance can disrupt them; when moving, they grow spontaneously—no external force can halt them. The term "gradually" in the Book of Changes describes this state of unhurried ease. The mindset of Dao-realized individuals isn't about forced stillness being superior, nor artificial effort creating vitality, but rather following natural disposition, allowing free development without tension, anxiety, or frantic striving.

Stillness isn't forcibly converting motion into rest, but motion naturally containing stillness; movement doesn't exist separately from stillness, but stillness inherently holding movement. This harmonious unity of motion and stillness manifests the Great Dao in all things. Therefore ancient cultivators moved amidst chaos without losing their still essence, naturally clarifying until nothing could disturb their serenity; appearing stable yet never ceasing movement, naturally growing until nothing could arrest their progress. If constrained by external things into stagnation, one cannot speak of "endless transformation."

Those maintaining this Dao principle never seek fullness. Emperor Huizong notes: Deliberate accumulation leads to insufficiency, while non-hoarding brings abundance. Dao-realized people don't forcibly accumulate, but maintain receptive emptiness. To believe all beautiful things under heaven reside within oneself reflects petty-mindedness. Thus the Dao De Jing states: "The purest white appears sullied, the most abundant De (Virtue) seems insufficient."

Cultivators must forget their grasping attitude toward the Dao. Those who become prideful upon gaining something will ultimately lose it, even if temporarily retained. Fullness leads to toppling—this inevitable principle denies lasting preservation. Only by not seeking fullness can one preserve the old without forcibly pursuing the new. The old gives rise to the fresh, completion leads to dissolution. This alternation mirrors seasonal cycles, as successions of achievement and ruin reflect universal birth and decay—all natural manifestations of the Great Dao.

 降麗於形數者蓋莫不然惟道無體虚而  不盈故能敝能新能成能壞超然岀乎形  數之外而未嘗敝未嘗壞也故曰夫惟不  盈故能敝不新成木始榮而終悴火初明  而末熄以有新也故敝隨之日中則昃月  滿則虧以有成也故壞繼之有道者異乎  此  臣義曰盈則必覆自滿故也以滿自矜而  必於新成此敝壞之理乗隨之矣孰能保  其盈乎新則有故成則有虧相代相因如  循環也能新能成嚮於事而有爲者也能  敝則復乎道而無爲者也物之新成則適  乎用而嚮於事物至於敝則時之所棄而  復於道能敝不新成何盈之有此道之所  以保也    致虚極章第十六 致虚極守靜篤  御注曰莫貴乎虚莫善乎靜虚靜者萬物  之本也虚故足以受群實靜故足以應群  動極者衆會而有所至篤者力行而有所  至致虚而要其極守靜而至於篤則萬態  雖雜而吾心常徹萬變雖殊而吾心常寂  此之謂天樂非體道者不足以與此  臣義曰虚者道之會靜者道之復虚則不  爲物累故爲群實之所寓靜則不與物雜  故爲群動之所宗惟虚與靜故足以爲天  地之鑑萬物之照而萬態萬變無足以撓  之者極者道之至中而衆之所會也篤者  道之勤行而力之所至也以一致虚而至  於極致之至也以一守靜而至於篤守之
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the importance of "emptiness and stillness" (xujing). The text points out that all tangible things inevitably undergo cycles of prosperity and decline—just as trees flourish then wither, or flames blaze brightly before extinguishing. The sun begins its descent after reaching its zenith, and the moon wanes after becoming full. These phenomena occur because once anything reaches a state of "fullness," it must inevitably decline.

Yet the Dao (the cosmic origin) is different—it has no concrete form and eternally maintains an empty, never-full state. Precisely because it never becomes full, it never truly decays or perishes, transcending the cycles of birth and destruction in the material world. Practitioners of the Dao must emulate this characteristic, cultivating a mindset of emptiness and stillness.

The commentary by Chen Yi further explains: Emptiness and stillness are the root of all things. Only through emptiness can one contain the myriad phenomena; only through stillness can one respond to all changes. By attaining the ultimate state of emptiness and stillness, even amidst the complexity and chaos of the world, the mind remains clear and undisturbed. This state is called "heavenly joy" (tianle, the bliss of union with the Dao), achievable only by those who truly embody the Dao.

The key to cultivation lies in "reaching the utmost emptiness and guarding perfect stillness" (zhi xuji, shou jingdu)—pushing the state of emptiness to its limit and perfecting the practice of stillness. Emptiness is where the Dao gathers; stillness is where the Dao returns. By maintaining emptiness and stillness, one avoids being burdened by external things, becoming instead a mirror to all phenomena—reflecting everything without disturbance. The ultimate state of emptiness and stillness is the highest realm of the Dao, attainable only through persistent and dedicated practice.

 至也致之未至則實或妨道守之未至則  動或違性 萬物并作吾以觀其復  御注曰萬物之變在道之末體道者寓乎  萬物之上焉物之生有所乎萌也終有所  乎歸方其并作而趨乎動出之塗吾觀其  動者之必靜及出者之必復而因以見天  地之心則交物而不與物俱化此之謂觀  其復  臣義曰萬物賦形於天地之間陰陽以氣  帥而出入勞於天機役於神化趣嚮乎有  生之塗并作而不能自已者也即動以觀  靜縁出以觀復體道者能之故要觀復於  萬物并作之際天地之心且得見矣况萬  物乎 夫物芸芸各復歸其根  御注曰芸芸者動出之象萬物出乎震相  見乎離則芸芸并作英華發外說乎侃勞  乎坎則去華就實歸其性宅命者性之本  而性其根也精者神之母而神其子也精  全則神王盡性則至於命  臣義曰芸芸者物之所生根本者物之所  復發爲英華縁根而生歸於性宅復歸其  根本大則末茂故根者物之命也芸芸歸  根所以復命也 歸根曰靜靜曰復命  御注曰流動而生物物生成理謂之形形  體保神各有儀則謂之性未形者有分且  然無間謂之命命亘古今而常存性更萬  形而不易全其形生之人去智與故歸於  寂定則知命之在我如彼春夏復爲秋冬  體性抱神中以自考此之謂復命
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the fundamental principles governing all phenomena and how Daoist practitioners observe and comprehend these laws.

All things in existence undergo constant transformation and growth, yet adepts must transcend surface appearances to perceive their ultimate return to the origin. Just as plants sprout in spring ("emerging from Zhen" signifies the vernal equinox in the east), flourish in summer ("manifesting in Li" indicates the summer solstice in the south), bear fruit in autumn ("ripening in Dui" represents the autumnal equinox in the west), and withdraw underground in winter ("resting in Kan" denotes the winter solstice in the north) - all must eventually return to their roots. By observing these cyclical patterns, practitioners apprehend the eternal principles of cosmic operation ("the Heart of Heaven and Earth").

The text introduces several key concepts:

"Life" (Ming) represents the fundamental source of existence, akin to a tree's roots; "Nature" (Xing) manifests as life's distinctive characteristics, comparable to branches and leaves. Though all things appear luxuriant ("teeming") in their outward display, they ultimately return to their origin ("reverting to the root"). This process of returning to essence constitutes "the return to Life."

The Daoist method involves relinquishing cleverness and attachments ("discarding wisdom and artifice") to enter a state of profound stillness ("returning to quiescent stability"). Through this practice, one experiences the eternal nature of life's source. Like the seasonal cycles that appear as change yet follow unchanging laws, those who truly comprehend the Dao can perceive, amidst the flourishing phenomena of creation ("amidst concurrent growth"), the inevitable principle of all things returning to their origin.

 臣義曰芸芸者動之華形之所分也歸根  者靜之至命之所復也萬物受命於無而  成形於有故有命然後有生有生斯有性  有性斯有情情響於動則流於物流於物  則徇末而傷本逐物而失性而命以故滅  矣夫惟形忘而不知其所生心忘而不知  其所起觀復於并作之時而理以窮矣芸  芸而各歸其根而性已盡矣理窮性盡而  返乎靜一復乎至無故曰復命 復命曰常  御注曰常者對變之辭復命則萬變不能  遷無間無歇與道爲一以契天地以襲氣  母  臣義曰常者不見親故無有終始不麗於  形不墮於數與道爲一而不遷於變道之  眞常也非復命不足以與此 知常曰明  御注曰知道之常不爲物遷故六徹相因  足以鑑天地足以照萬物  臣義曰知不以心而得道之常是眞知也  視不以目而見於無形性覺自見者也故  曰明眞知則不爲物遷明故能鑑照天地  萬物 不知常妄作凶  御注曰聖人知道之常故作則契理每與  吉會不知常者隨物轉徙觸涂自患故妄  見美惡以與道違妄生是非以與道異且  不足以固其命故凶易曰復則不妄迷而  不知復兹妄也已  臣義曰知命之復則知常矣不知命之復  而馳騁於外接構於物忘其性命道德之  本汨於美惡是非之末捨彼眞實流於妄
Interpretation

All the myriad transformations and complexities of existence are but external manifestations of movement and the results of physical differentiation. Returning to the root (referring to the Dao) represents the highest state of stillness and the restoration of life's original source. All things receive life from emptiness (xu) and take form through substantiality (shi). Thus, life precedes growth, growth gives rise to inherent nature, and inherent nature gives rise to emotions. When emotions follow external objects, one becomes mired in the material world, chasing trivialities at the expense of the fundamental, indulging in external things while losing one's inherent nature—ultimately leading to the dissipation of life's original essence.

Only by forgetting physical form and not clinging to the source of life, by relinquishing mental constructs and not questioning their origins, and by observing the principle of return to the origin amidst the flourishing growth of all things can one thoroughly comprehend the truth of the great Dao. When the myriad complexities each return to their root, inherent nature is fully revealed. Understanding this truth and fully manifesting one's nature allows one to return to the pure and unified state, to the ultimate emptiness (xu)—this is what is called "returning to the origin of life."

Returning to the origin of life is called "the constant" (chang, the eternal principle). The "constant" stands in contrast to change; once returned to the origin, no transformation can unsettle it. It is without interruption or cessation, unified with the Dao, in harmony with heaven and earth, and sustained by the primal Qi of all things. The "constant" knows no favoritism or distinction, has no beginning or end, does not depend on form, and is not limited by quantity. Unified with the Dao yet unaffected by change, this is the true eternity of the Dao. Without returning to the origin of life, one cannot attain this state.

Understanding the principle of the "constant" is true wisdom. This wisdom is not obtained through ordinary intellect but through direct realization of the Dao's eternity; it is not seen with physical eyes but perceived with the illumination of one's inherent nature. True wisdom remains unaffected by external things, and true clarity can reflect all phenomena between heaven and earth.

Those who do not understand the eternal principle and act recklessly invite misfortune. The sages, understanding the eternal laws of the Dao, act in accordance with heavenly principle and always meet with auspiciousness. Those ignorant of the eternal principle are led by external things, creating troubles everywhere, arbitrarily distinguishing beauty and ugliness in opposition to the Dao, fabricating right and wrong in defiance of truth—unable even to preserve their own lives, thus courting calamity. The Yijing states, "Returning to the correct path prevents reckless action." To lose one's way and not know how to return—this is true recklessness.

Understanding the return to the origin of life means comprehending the eternal principle. Ignorance of this truth leads only to outward pursuit, entanglement with material desires, forgetfulness of the roots of life, virtue, and the Dao, obsession with trivial distinctions of beauty and ugliness, right and wrong, and abandonment of one's true nature for illusion—this is the source of calamity.

 假喪精失靈曾不知返迷不知復孰免凶  患 知常容  御注曰知常則不藏是非美惡故無所不  容  臣義曰知常則復乎至無與道同體容之  至也 容乃公  御注曰無容心焉則不獨親其親不獨子  其子何私之有  臣義曰無所不容㝠與道契物我不立何  復有私 公乃王  御注曰大道之行也天下爲公故天下樂  推而不厭  臣義曰與道爲公則天下之所歸往也故  樂推不厭 王乃天天乃道  御注曰通天地人而位乎天地之中者王  也一而大在上而無不覆者天也天地人  莫不由之者道也盡人則同乎天體天則  同乎道  臣義曰天下之所歸往而不知其所歸往  付之自然大無不覆而同乎天忘其所以  然而然而復歸於無此盡人體天而同乎  道者此也 道乃乆没身不殆  御注曰道者萬世無弊庶物得之者昌關  百聖而不窮蔽天地而不息故没身不殆  殆近凶幾近吉不殆則無妄作之凶非知  常者無與  臣義曰惟道故能乆乆者道之常也道藏  於無故能乆身墮於形故有没雖没而不  殆者雖死而未嘗死况有妄作之凶乎    太上章第十七 太上下知有之  御注曰在宥天下與一世而得惔怕焉無  欣欣之樂而親譽不及無悴悴之苦而畏  侮不至莫之爲而常自然故下知有之而  已
Interpretation

This scripture discusses how spiritual practitioners should recognize the importance of the "constant Dao" (changdao) - the eternal, unchanging principle. Those who lose their innate nature and vital Qi (qi) without returning to the right path will inevitably encounter misfortune. One who truly understands the constant Dao possesses a vast mind capable of embracing all things, having returned to the state of "ultimate nothingness" (zhiwu), becoming one with the Dao.

When a person attains this all-encompassing state, they achieve impartiality, free from personal biases. This quality of selfless fairness naturally attracts people's allegiance, much like the sage-kings of antiquity. Such enlightened rulers comprehend the triad of heaven, earth and humanity - their virtue (de) resembles the all-covering firmament, all stemming from their realization of the Dao. By completely emulating the way of heaven, one becomes unified with the Dao.

The Dao is eternal and indestructible; all things flourish through attaining it. Even when the physical body perishes, those who have realized the Dao never truly die, nor do they suffer calamities brought by reckless actions.

Chapter Seventeen describes how the most enlightened ruler (taishang) governs the world - the people merely know of his existence. He lets the world operate naturally, neither artificially creating joy nor inflicting suffering, allowing all things to follow their course. Thus the people neither excessively praise him nor fear insult. This represents the highest manifestation of "governing through non-action" (wuwei).

 臣義曰至治之世上無爲也知標技然故  天下同焉皆生而不知其所以生同焉皆  得而不知其所以得徒知有其上而曾不  知上之何力於我也 其次親之譽之  御注曰澤加乎民法傳於世天下愛之若  父母故親之貴名起之如日月故譽之此  帝王之治親譽之迹彰而大同之道虧矣  莊子曰舜有羶行百姓悦之詩於靈臺所  以言文王之民始附也  臣義曰仁義之政施於有爲有恩可親而  得以歸附有德可懷而得以稱譽雖治迹  善於一時而道德之全已散於物假 其次畏之侮之  御注曰道之以政齊之以刑故畏之舉天  下以賞其善者不勸舉天下以罰其惡者  不沮諸侯有問鼎大小輕重如楚子者陪  臣有竊寳玉大弓如陽虎者此衰世之俗  故侮之  臣義曰治不知要而事於形迹至於爲仁  爲義而仁義之化有不得而行故畏之以  刑威而治之以法制法出而生奸令下而  起詐諸侯至於問鼎陪臣至於竊寳故曰  畏之侮之 故信不足焉有不信  御注曰附離不以膠漆約束不以纏索此  至信也商人作誓而民始畔周人作會而  民始疑信不足故也太上下知有之則當  而不知以爲信其次畏之侮之則知詐頡  滑機變之巧生而有不信者矣  臣義曰治不本乎道而上不信道至於假  法制以立威而期人之畏而不侮信不足
Interpretation

In the most well-governed era of Great Peace, the ruler (referring to the sovereign) adopts the method of governing through Wuwei (non-action). Though the people live within this system, they do not know who enables their existence; though all enjoy stability, they remain unaware of its source. The people merely sense there is a ruler above them, yet feel no tangible force being exerted upon them.

A lesser form of governance makes the people feel close to and praise their ruler. As imperial commentaries explain: when benevolence reaches the populace and teachings spread through society, the people cherish their ruler as they would their parents, hence feeling closeness; his illustrious reputation shines like the sun and moon, hence eliciting praise. However, this governance that emphasizes intimacy and acclaim has already deviated from the perfect harmony of the Great Dao. Zhuangzi observed that Emperor Shun's benevolent governance was like the natural fragrance of mutton that people instinctively loved. The "Lingtai" chapter in the Book of Songs describes how people voluntarily submitted during King Wen's reign—both examples illustrate this principle.

An even lesser form employs policies of benevolence and righteousness. This governance through youwei (conscious action) makes people draw near out of gratitude and offer praise moved by virtue. While effective in the short term, the complete Dao and De (Virtue/Power) become fragmented in specific affairs, losing their primordial wholeness.

Worse still is governance that makes people fear and despise their ruler. Using decrees to guide and punishments to regulate creates fear; rewards fail to encourage goodness while punishments cannot curb wickedness. Like when the Chu king inquired about the royal cauldrons (coveting Zhou authority) or when Yang Hu stole Lu's precious jade and great bow—these are signs of a decaying era that invite public contempt.

When governance misses the essence and focuses on superficial forms—promoting benevolence and righteousness without genuine transformation—it resorts to punitive deterrence and legal constraints. The result: stricter laws breed more deceit; complex edicts spawn greater fraud. When feudal lords covet royal power and ministers brazenly steal national treasures, we witness the chaos of "fear and contempt."

The root problem lies in insufficient sincerity. The highest sincerity needs no glue or ropes to bind. When Shang dynasty rulers relied on oaths, the people began to rebel; when Zhou rulers employed alliances, suspicion arose. The best governance leaves people merely aware of their ruler's existence without feeling governed. But when fear and contempt dominate, all manner of cunning schemes emerge. If governance isn't rooted in the Dao, and the ruler himself lacks faith in it—relying solely on legal authority while expecting fear without contempt—this very approach demonstrates a fundamental lack of sincerity.

 也上信不足則下有不信而日以偷薄亂  之大者其孰能治 猶兮其貴言  御注曰以道觀言而天下之君正則言豈  可易哉戒愼而弗敢輕也故言而世爲天  下道行言自爲而天下化  臣義曰貴言則不輕於言言且不輕豈輕  於爲乎云爲不輕則信於道也以其不信  底亂故猶兮其貴言也 功成事遂百姓皆謂我自然  御注曰帝王之功聖人之餘事也使民甘  其食美其服安其俗樂其業而餘事足以  成帝王之功然謂我自然而已曰帝力何  有於我哉此之謂太上之治  臣義曰涉於事爲而弊精神於蹇淺雖曰  爲治而曰底於亂治不以道故也本乎性  命而遂生成於自然雖曰無爲而帝力何  知貴言則治之以不言而化之以道故帝  王之功應世之事旣成旣遂而百姓莫得  而形容皆謂我之自然豈知上之治哉知  有其上而已    大道廢章第十八 大道廢有仁義  御注曰失道而後德失德而後仁失仁而  後義仁以立人義以立我而去道也遠矣  韓愈不原聖人道德之意乃以謂仁與義  爲定名道與德爲虚位老子之小仁義其  所見者小也莊子所謂蔽蒙之民  臣義曰大道無名物我俱泯復於至無不  容聲矣有仁有義離道已遠德之分也仁  以愛人而未能遺人義以立我而未能忘  我仁義之名立而我人之爲累嚮於事爲
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the relationship between rulers and the people, as well as the relationship between the "Great Dao" and "benevolence and righteousness."

When rulers lack sincerity and trustworthiness, the people will lose faith in them, social customs will gradually deteriorate, and ultimately lead to great chaos. Truly wise rulers speak with great caution, never carelessly voicing their opinions. Since the ruler's words and actions become the standard for the entire world, they must be handled with utmost prudence. When a ruler governs with the Dao (the Way), achievements are accomplished, yet the people feel they achieved these naturally themselves, unaware of the ruler's role. This represents the highest form of governance.

Regarding the relationship between the "Great Dao" and "benevolence and righteousness": only after the "Great Dao" is abandoned does the need arise to emphasize "benevolence and righteousness." The Dao is the most fundamental—only when the Dao is lost does one speak of De (Virtue/Power); when De is lost, one speaks of benevolence; when benevolence is lost, one speaks of righteousness. To treat others with "benevolence" and demand "righteousness" from oneself is already far removed from the Dao. Han Yu criticized Laozi for belittling benevolence and righteousness precisely because he failed to comprehend the fundamental meaning of the Dao. What Zhuangzi called "the people obscured by blinders" refers precisely to those who are deluded by superficial concepts like benevolence and righteousness.

The true "Great Dao" cannot be confined by names—it transcends the distinction between "self" and "things." When people begin speaking of "benevolence and righteousness," they have already deviated from the Dao. While "benevolence" may show love for others, it still maintains the distinction between "self and others"; while "righteousness" may establish the self, it still involves attachment to ego. Once concepts like "benevolence and righteousness" are established, people become constrained by notions of "self and others."

 而道之所廢也 智慧出有大僞  御注曰民智力竭則以僞繼之  臣義曰以知之智以心之慧將以籠絡世  變出而有爲則民以智巧交相勝而僞亂  起矣 六親不和有孝慈國家昏亂有忠臣  御注曰名生於不足故也莊子曰孝子不  諛其親忠臣不諂其君臣子之盛也  臣義曰六親和則不知其所以爲孝慈也  國家治則不知其臣之忠也惟和與治則  孝之與忠亦常也無孝慈然後有孝慈之  名有不忠然後有以稱其忠    絶聖棄智章第十九 絶聖棄智民利百倍  御注曰道與之性一而不雜離道爲德是  名聖智聖智立而天下始有喬詰卓鷙之  行驚愚而明污譽堯而非桀則聖智之利  天下也少而害天下也多絶而棄之與道  同體則各安其性命之情其利博矣  臣義曰聖智之名離道而分於德也民性  喪其眞純而離於樸古故聖智出焉聖以  能化爲體智以知人爲用上以聖智臨下  則民爭事於聖智之迹而不知所自貴者  逐末反本重爲民害聖智無所用而退藏  於絶棄之域則民將自得於大順忘所慕  尚而足於性分故其利博 絶仁棄義民復孝慈  御注曰孝慈天性也蹩躠爲仁踶跂爲義  而以仁義易其性矣絶仁棄義則民將反  其性而復其初不獨親其親不獨子其子  其於孝慈也何有
Interpretation

When the great Dao (the Way) is abandoned, people begin to esteem cleverness, and this leads to rampant hypocrisy. Emperor Huizong of Song explained that when the people exhaust their intellectual capacities, they resort to deception in response. His minister elaborated that when knowledge is treated as wisdom and scheming as intelligence—using these to manipulate worldly affairs—people begin competing with each other through cunning, resulting in the rise of falsehood and disorder.

When families are disharmonious, filial sons and loving mothers become conspicuous; when the state is in chaos, loyal ministers stand out. Emperor Huizong quoted Zhuangzi, saying that a truly filial son does not flatter his parents, and a truly loyal minister does not fawn upon his ruler—this is the highest standard of conduct for subjects. The minister added that when families are harmonious, people do not deliberately display filial piety or maternal kindness; when the state is well-governed, the loyalty of ministers does not draw special attention. Only when harmony is lost do the names of filial piety and kindness emerge; only when loyalty is lacking do people gain the reputation of being loyal.

Regarding the chapter on "Renouncing Sageliness and Discarding Wisdom" (Chapter 19): If the titles of sages are rejected and clever stratagems abandoned, the people will benefit a hundredfold. Emperor Huizong explained that the Dao endows human nature with pure simplicity, but when people deviate from the Dao in pursuit of virtue, the concept of "sagehood and wisdom" arises. Once sageliness and wisdom are established, the world begins to see eccentric behaviors, with people competing in novelty—praising Yao and Shun while condemning Jie and Zhou. In truth, sageliness and wisdom bring more harm than good to the world. If these are renounced and discarded, returning to the original state of the Dao, people will rest content in their innate nature and gain true benefit.

The minister further explained: These titles of sageliness and wisdom emerge only when people stray from the Dao. When the people lose their simple, genuine nature, theories of sageliness and wisdom appear. Sages take educating the people as their foundation; the wise take understanding human nature as their function. When rulers use sageliness and wisdom to govern, the people compete to imitate their superficial forms while forgetting their own intrinsic value. By rejecting the names of sageliness and wisdom, the people can return to their natural state—no longer blindly worshipping but resting in their true nature, thus gaining the greatest benefit.

If the empty reputation of benevolence and righteousness is discarded, the people will recover their natural filial piety and kindness. Emperor Huizong pointed out that filial piety and kindness are innate, but when people deliberately promote benevolence and righteousness, human nature is distorted. By abandoning these artificial labels, the people return to their true nature, caring not only for their own kin but extending love universally—thus naturally achieving genuine filial piety and kindness.

 臣義曰孝慈者仁義之實也仁義之名立  而民性失矣民性本足乎孝慈而累於仁  義之名諄諄孑孑名實交糾所以亂性惟  絶棄於仁義之迹則民將渾然完其天性  誠焉相與而忘其情僞故復其孝慈 絶巧棄利盜賊無有  御注曰爲機變之巧者無所用耻有欲利  之心者不顧其義是皆穿窬之類  臣義曰尚巧則竭其智而無所不至何耻  之有尚利則貴其貨而期於必得何義之  顧巧絶然後民食力而易足利棄然後民  用儉而有餘故盜賊也何有 此三者以爲文不足故令有所屬  御注曰先王以人道治天下至周而彌文  及其弊也以文滅質文有餘而質不足天  下舉失其素樸之眞而日淪於私欲之習  老氏當周之末方將祛其弊而使之反本  故攘棄仁義絶滅禮學雖聖智亦在所擯  彼其心豈眞以仁義聖智爲不足以治天  下哉先王之道若循環捄文者莫若質故  令有所屬謂見素抱樸少私寡欲也  臣義曰聖智仁義巧利三者文存質滅故  民失其利孝慈不復盜賊多有由信不足  而文具爾故有所棄絶棄絶其文則天下  不至於失眞而流僞故老氏祛其文弊而  使之反本令有所屬也見素抱樸少私寡  欲所屬如此 見素  御注曰語曰繪事後素素未受色見素則  純粹而不雜  臣義曰性本純素動爲物染則雜而不一
Interpretation

This passage elucidates that filial piety (xiao, reverence for parents) and parental love (ci, kindness to children) constitute the true substance of humaneness (ren) and righteousness (yi). When people deliberately emphasize the labels of "humaneness and righteousness," they ironically lose their innate simplicity. The people inherently possess filial devotion and parental care in their nature, yet these become constrained by the artificial constructs of "humaneness and righteousness." The conflict between names and reality disrupts their fundamental character. Only by relinquishing attachment to the formal trappings of "humaneness and righteousness" can the people return to their complete natural disposition, interacting with genuine sincerity rather than calculated pretense—thus restoring authentic filial piety and parental love.

Regarding "reject cunning and abandon profit, then thieves and robbers will disappear": Those who pursue crafty schemes feel no shame, while profit-seekers disregard moral duty—both constitute theft. Valuing cunning leads to unrestrained scheming without compunction; how could shame remain? Chasing profit prioritizes material gain by any means; how could righteousness be upheld? Only by eliminating cunning will the people work diligently with contentment; only by abandoning profit-seeking will they live frugally with abundance. How could thieves exist then?

These three (sagely wisdom, humaneness-righteousness, and cunning-profit) are superficial constructs insufficient for governing the world. Ancient kings ruled through civilizing rituals, but by the Zhou dynasty, excessive focus on form overshadowed substance. People lost their pristine nature, increasingly mired in selfish desires. Laozi, living in the late Zhou era, sought to dismantle these distortions and restore humanity's authentic state—thus advocating discarding humaneness-righteousness, abolishing ritual formalism, and even rejecting sagely wisdom. This doesn't imply these cannot govern, but recognizes that the ancient kings' Dao requires returning to unadorned simplicity. Therefore, one must have an anchor: preserving innate purity while reducing selfish cravings.

"Manifest plainness" (jian su): Like painting requiring plain silk as its foundation, su represents the undyed state of pristine whiteness. Human nature is originally simple, becoming disordered through external influences. Sagely wisdom, humaneness-righteousness, and cunning-profit—these external constructs make people lose their filial devotion while thieves proliferate, precisely because excessive formality lacks substance. Hence Laozi advocates dismantling artificial distortions to return to authenticity: anchoring in pure simplicity while diminishing selfish desires.

 性靜則純一無物自見如此故曰見素 抱樸  御注曰經曰樸散則爲器樸未嘗斲抱樸  則靜一而不變莊子曰同乎無欲是謂素  樸素樸而民性得矣  臣義曰樸者木之渾全而未散於器者也  民性全於自然而未嚮於物一而不變守  而不脱故曰抱樸 少私寡欲  御注曰自營爲私而養心莫善於寡欲少  私寡欲則定乎内外之分辨乎眞僞之歸  德全而性復聖智之名泯矣  臣義曰私欲勝則失已於物也少私寡欲  則内省物輕知所自貴而全乎天德德全  而復乎性初何事聖
Interpretation

This passage presents Emperor Huizong of Song's commentary on the phrase "See simplicity and embrace plainness, reduce selfishness and lessen desires" from the Dao De Jing. The core meaning conveys:

Human nature manifests in a state of pure unity when in tranquil stillness, undisturbed by external things. In this state, one can perceive the authentic self—this is the meaning of "seeing simplicity" (jian su). "Embracing plainness" (bao pu) resembles uncarved wood maintaining its natural wholeness. Zhuangzi said achieving desirelessness constitutes "simplicity and plainness"—only in this state can human nature fully reveal itself.

"Plainness" (pu) refers to wood in its unworked, complete state. Human nature operates similarly: when wholly aligned with the natural way and unswayed by external temptations, it maintains unified constancy—this embodies "embracing plainness."

"Reducing selfishness and lessening desires" means decreasing personal interests and diminishing cravings. Emperor Huizong considered pursuing personal gain as "selfishness" (si), while the optimal method for cultivating one's heart-mind lies in reducing desires. Achieving this enables distinguishing inner from outer, discerning truth from falsehood, thereby restoring complete Virtue (De) and returning to original nature. At this stage, labels like "sage wisdom" become meaningless.

Minister Zhao Yi supplemented that excessive selfish desires trap people in external attachments. By reducing these cravings, one can introspect while devaluing material things, recognizing what is truly precious—thus preserving innate Virtue. When Virtue becomes whole, nature returns to its primordial state; what need remains for pursuing reputations of sagely wisdom?

智 宋徽宗道德眞經解義卷之三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0064); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →