中文 · EN

《道德真經疏義(一)》Vol. 14

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 14 / 14 10,667 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經疏義(一)》 Vol. 14 (Dongshen 洞神部, 14 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 21 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經疏義(一)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經䟽義卷之十四忘七     太學生江澂䟽    民之饑章第七十五 民之饑以其上食税之多也是以饑  徽宗註曰賦重則田萊多荒民不足於食  䟽義曰孟子曰易其田疇薄其税斂民可  使富也食之以時用之以禮財不可勝用  也聖人之治天下所以使民含哺而嬉鼓  腹而游日用飲食樂歲終身飽者非特不  重其賦以養民而已蓋有以使之棄末趨  本故也蓋德惟善政而政所以裕民治古  之時有得於此是以即十有二土以辨其  宜因十有二壞以教其稼分地職奠地貢  任之成功則有鄙師之賞勸之弗率則有  載師之罰未然故民莫不致力南畝樂業  勸功而黎民不饑矣當是時甘其食美其  服不知帝力何有於我又焉有田萊多荒  不足於食之患哉 民之難治以其上之有爲也是以難治  徽宗註曰政煩則姦僞滋起民失其朴  䟽義曰聖人以道在天下以政事治之雖  應物之有常體道之無即其酬酢之用不  離於淵虚之宗好靜而民自正無事而民  自富無欲而民自樸所以然者以其恃道  化而不恃智巧故也恃道化則政不煩不  恃智巧則姦僞息民將復歸於樸矣經曰  其政悶悶其民淳淳其政察察其民缺缺  政煩則姦僞滋起民失其朴其政察察其  民缺缺之謂也 人之輕死以其生生之厚也是以輕死
Interpretation

This passage comes from the Commentary on the Authentic Scripture of Dao and Virtue (Daode Zhenjing Shuyi) by Jiang Cheng, a National University student during the Song dynasty, explicating Chapter 75 of the Laozi. It examines why people suffer hunger, become difficult to govern, and recklessly court death.

Regarding "the people's hunger," the commentary cites Mencius to illustrate that when sages govern, they reduce taxes and regulate farming according to seasons, ensuring prosperity. Ancient sage-kings taught agriculture suited to local conditions and established fair reward systems, enabling people to live contentedly without want. In contrast, contemporary rulers impose heavy levies that force farmland abandonment, leaving people destitute.

On "the people being hard to govern," the annotation clarifies that sages rule through the Dao (the Way), employing simple governance that preserves innate simplicity. Excessive regulations breed cunning and hypocrisy, corrupting the people's natural integrity. As the text states: lenient governance fosters淳朴 (chúnpǔ, rustic honesty), while harsh measures provoke crafty evasion.

Finally, the "people courting death" phenomenon arises when rulers excessively pursue lavish living (sheng sheng zhi hou—overindulgence in material comforts). By hoarding wealth, they impoverish the masses, who then risk death in desperation. The commentary stresses returning to Dao-governance (daohua—transformation through the Way) with minimal interference, allowing people to flourish naturally.

(Note: Sheng sheng zhi hou denotes extreme materialism; daohua refers to educating through Dao-principles; yuan xu zhi zong describes the Dao's fundamental attributes—profound emptiness and stillness.)

 徽宗註曰矜生太厚則欲利甚勤放僻邪  侈无不爲已  䟽義曰生亦我所欲所欲有甚於生者故  不爲苟得也死亦我所惡所惡有甚於死  者故患有所不辟也世之人不知取所重  遺所輕乃厚於其生薄於其義苟得於利  者靡不爲也惟其生生之厚故欲利甚勤  爭魚者濡逐獸者趨至於失其常心放僻  邪侈无不爲已方且蹈犯艱險輕於視死  雖矜生太厚適足以喪生也 唯无以生爲者是賢於貴生也  徽宗註曰莊子曰達生之情者不務生之  所无以爲无以生爲者不務生之所無以  爲棄事而遺生故也棄事則形不勞遺生  則精不虧形全精復與天爲一所以賢於  貴生貴生則異於輕死遺生則賢於貴生  推所以善吾生者而施之於民則薄税斂  簡刑罰家給人足畫衣冠異章服而民不  犯帝王之極功也  䟽義曰道本無物汝身亦虚即一身之所  繫莫若乎生而生非汝有是天地之委和  也惟不自有其生乃能全其生則達生之  情者又安用務生之所無以爲哉悲夫世  之人以養形足以存生而養形果不足以  存生殊不知無累則正平正平則邪氣不  能襲而天和將至與彼更生矣能無累則  无以生爲无以生爲則不務生之所無以  爲可以棄事而遺生矣棄事則形不勞而  全遺生則精不虧而復形全精復德同於
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of the Song Dynasty, in his commentary on the Dao De Jing, observed that those excessively attached to life often become reckless in their pursuit of profit. They will do anything to survive, indulging in unrestrained, wicked, and extravagant behavior, completely disregarding moral boundaries.

Here’s the reasoning behind this: Life is undoubtedly precious, but there are things more important than life itself (referring to righteousness and the Dao), which is why true noble individuals do not cling to life at all costs. Death is certainly fearsome, but there are things more detestable than death (referring to betraying the Dao), which is why they do not flee from calamity. Ordinary people, however, fail to distinguish what truly matters—they overvalue life and fear death while neglecting the Dao, daring to do anything for profit. Precisely because they regard life as too important, they desperately chase after gain. Like those who fight over fish and end up soaked or those who chase wild beasts and exhaust themselves, these individuals lose their equanimity, acting recklessly and immorally without restraint. They take dangerous risks and treat death lightly, appearing to cherish life, yet in reality, they hasten their demise.

The truly wise are those who do not treat life as private property (referring to those who have attained the Dao). Zhuangzi once said: "Those who understand the true nature of life do not pursue what life does not require." To "not regard life as private" means not forcibly seeking things beyond life’s needs. Such people can let go of worldly affairs and transcend life and death, ensuring their bodies are not exhausted and their spirit (Shen) is not depleted. By maintaining physical wholeness and spiritual vitality, they become one with nature—a far superior approach to those who obsess over preserving life. Those who cling to life inevitably fear death, while those who transcend it reach a higher state of being.

Extending this principle to governance, a ruler should reduce taxes, simplify punishments, and ensure the people are well-fed and clothed. Even if symbolic punishments (such as using patterns in place of actual penalties) are employed, the people will not commit crimes—this is the highest ideal of imperial rule.

The fundamental truth is this: The Great Dao (Dao) itself has no concrete form, and your body is illusory. The most precious thing in human existence is life, yet life does not truly belong to you—it is merely the harmonious Qi (vital energy) temporarily bestowed by heaven and earth. Only by not claiming life as your own can you truly preserve it. Those who understand the essence of life—why should they pursue what life does not need? Tragically, ordinary people believe that nurturing the body ensures the preservation of life, unaware that caring for the form does not guarantee the survival of the spirit. In truth, when one is not burdened by external things, the mind remains pure, and no harmful Qi can invade—naturally harmonizing with heaven and earth. To be free from external entanglements is to not regard life as private; to not regard life as private is to not forcibly seek what lies beyond it. Only then can one let go of worldly concerns and transcend life and death. Letting go of worldly affairs preserves the body without exhaustion, while transcending life and death restores the spirit without depletion. With a whole body and a vibrant spirit, one’s virtue (De) becomes one with heaven and earth.

 初則與天爲一所以賢於貴生也貴生雖  異於輕死不若遺生則又賢於貴生也聖  人推吾所以善吾生者舉而措之天下之  民則政裕而民康見於薄稅歛刑清而民  服見於簡刑罰家給人足仰有所事俯有  所育而民各趨於仁壽之域釿鋸不用椎  鑿不施畫衣冠異章服而民不犯夫然故  貴賤履位仁賢不肖襲情坐致太平之治  炳然與太古同風矣推其所自以明无爲  之理推所以善吾生者施之於民而已所  以民足食而不飢民復樸而不難治民貴  生而不輕死也帝王之極功其在是歟    人之生章第七十六 人之生也柔弱其死也堅强草木之生也柔 脆其死也枯槁故堅强者死之徒也柔弱者 生之徒也  徽宗註曰萬物負陰而抱陽沖氣以爲和  陽以發生爲德陰以肅殺爲事方其肅殺  則冲和喪矣故曰堅强者死之徒柔弱者  生之徒  䟽義曰列子曰陰陽之所變者謂之生謂  之死萬物盈於天地之間麗於奇耦域於  動靜莫不負陰抱陽冲氣以爲和即其生  殺言之陽氣常熙以發生爲德萬物因之  以敷榮故柔者剛弱者强陰氣常凝以肅  殺爲事萬物因之以凋瘁故堅者毁銳者  挫氣機密移至於肅殺則冲和喪而復乎  至幽矣世之役於陰陽者知其生殺相代  而不知常勝之道曰柔常不勝之道曰剛
Interpretation

Originally united with heaven, earth, and nature, this approach is more profound than mere life-nourishment practices. While valuing life is certainly better than disregarding death, transcending attachments to life and death altogether represents an even higher wisdom. When sages extend their self-cultivation principles to governing the world, they achieve benevolent governance and public wellbeing. This manifests as: lightened taxes that people willingly comply with; simplified penal codes that bring prosperity to every household; revering ancestors above while nurturing descendants below, guiding all toward virtuous longevity. Even punitive instruments become unnecessary—distinctions in ceremonial attire suffice to maintain order without legal violations. Thus each social rank finds its proper place, the worthy and ordinary each fulfill their roles, and great peace emerges naturally as in antiquity's pristine era. The foundation of such governance lies in understanding Wuwei (non-action)—simply extending perfected life-cultivation methods to the populace. Consequently, people enjoy abundant sustenance without hunger, return to simplicity for easy governance, and cherish life without fearing death. Is this not the ultimate ideal of imperial rule?

Chapter 76 "On Human Life" states: Living humans possess soft bodies that stiffen in death; growing plants are tender while withered ones become brittle. Thus rigidity characterizes death, while pliancy signifies life.

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: All things contain Yin-Yang energies whose harmonious interaction creates balance. Yang qi governs growth and transformation, Yin qi governs contraction and harvest. When destructive Yin dominates, this harmony ruptures. Hence rigidity signals death, softness indicates life.

Further explanation: Liezi taught that Yin-Yang transformations create life and death. All beings between heaven and earth—whether odd or even in number, moving or still—contain these dual energies. Observing growth and decay: warm Yang fosters development, making the tender become firm and weak turn strong; condensed Yin brings withering, making the hard ultimately crumble and sharpness dull. As these energies covertly circulate, destructive Yin's ascendancy breaks harmony, returning all to profound darkness. Mortals governed by these cycles see only life-death alternations, failing to recognize pliancy as endurance's path while rigidity invites downfall.

 故失生理而動之死地焉蓋一陰一陽之  謂道萬物莫不由之者也計事則堅强足  以勝柔弱語道則柔弱足以勝堅强此堅  强爲死之徒柔弱爲生之徒也 是以兵强則不勝  徽宗註曰抗兵相加則哀者勝矣  䟽義曰三軍五兵之運德之末也聖人運  精神動心術所務者本而後末從之則天  威震疊神武不殺見於仁眇天下而無不  懷義眇天下而無不畏固足以保大定功  安民和衆得其常勝之道又豈以兵强爲  先哉故以道佐人主者不以兵强天下然  則抗兵相加而哀者勝以善持勝故也 木强則共  徽宗註曰拱把之桐梓人皆知養之强則  伐而共之矣  䟽義曰詩曰椅桐梓漆蓋桐梓者柔良之  材可以備禮樂之用方其始生也特拱把  之小而已人苟欲生之皆知養之以其柔  弱也及其曰夜之所息雨露之所潤可以  中宫室器械之材則伐而共之矣以其堅  强也稽諸植物猶以强而先伐則堅强者  死之徒何獨於人而疑之 故堅强居下柔弱處上  徽宗註曰柔之勝剛弱之勝强老氏之道  術有在於是莊子曰以懦弱謙下爲表  䟽義曰柔者道之剛故常勝之道在柔弱  者道之强故常不勝之道在强蓋積於柔  而成剛積之者在其先積於弱而成强成  之者在其後先者在上後者在下堅强固  居上柔弱固處下矣即天地以觀之天以
Interpretation

This passage expounds the core Daoist principle that "the soft and weak overcome the hard and strong." All things follow the Dao's law of Yin-Yang transformation. While superficially the strong appear to conquer the weak, from the Dao's essential perspective, it is actually softness that ultimately prevails. Rigidity belongs to the nature of death, while pliancy embodies the way of life.

Consider military strategy: relying solely on brute force often leads to defeat. As Emperor Huizong of Song noted in his commentary, when armies clash, the side harboring compassion in their hearts tends to prevail. Truly enlightened rulers govern through spiritual power (xinshu), prioritizing fundamental virtues while treating force as a last resort. Such rulers naturally command respect without bloodshed, uniting the world through benevolence and righteousness—this is the path of enduring victory. Therefore, those who assist rulers with the Dao never seek dominance through military might.

The analogy of trees illustrates this principle: people carefully nurture the tender saplings of soft-wooded catalpa and chinaberry trees, yet when these grow into hard timber, they become lumber for construction. If even plants suffer premature destruction due to hardness, how much more so for humans? Thus, what appears strong often occupies the lower position, while what seems weak actually resides above.

Emperor Huizong quotes Zhuangzi to clarify: Daoism advocates manifesting outward softness and humility. Through accumulation, softness becomes true strength; through transformation, weakness becomes genuine power. Observe heaven and earth's operation—the seemingly soft heavens above contain all things, while the seemingly hard earth supports from below. The essence of Laozi and Zhuangzi's Daoist art lies precisely in this wisdom of "the soft and weak occupying the higher position."

 積氣職生覆而位乎上積氣非堅强也地  以積塊職形載而位乎下積塊非柔弱也  即物理以觀之水之爲性决之東則東决  之西則西而攻堅强莫之能先風之爲物  指我則勝我䠓我亦勝我而折大木唯我  能之則以積衆小不勝爲大勝故也勝者  在上則不勝者斯爲下矣老氏之道術每  得於此以謂堅則毁矣銳則挫矣故知雄  而守雌知白而守黑人皆取先己獨取後  未嘗先人而嘗隨人可謂得常勝之道矣  觀其書論柔弱勝剛强者不一有曰守柔  有曰致柔又曰不敢以取强焉又曰强梁  者不得其死於是篇又詳言强弱之道莊  子謂以懦弱謙下爲表夫爲表則非處下  之道矣昔孔子對子路問强以謂寬柔以  教不報無道南方之强也其亦守柔之道  歟孰謂老氏之書與孔子之道不合    天之道章第七十七 天之道其猶張弓乎高者抑之下者舉之有 餘者損之不足者補之  徽宗註曰道無益損物有盈虚注焉而不  滿酌焉而不竭者聖人之所保也降而在  物則天地盈虚與時消息而況於人乎天  之道以中爲至故高者抑之不至於有餘  下者舉之不至于不足將來者進成功者  退四時運行各得其序  䟽義曰道之在天下廣也包畛纖也入薉  用之彌滿六虚廢之莫知其所何損益之  有自道而降斯囿於物域於氣而爲氣之
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the cosmic operation of heaven and earth, as well as the principle of "the soft and weak overcoming the hard and strong" in human conduct.

The movement of the heavenly Dao (the Way) resembles drawing a bow to shoot an arrow—what is high is lowered somewhat, what is low is raised somewhat; what is excessive is reduced, and what is insufficient is supplemented. The great Dao itself undergoes no increase or decrease, yet concrete things experience cycles of flourishing and decline. The sage maintains a state that is eternally unfillable and inexhaustible, while in the realm of tangible phenomena, the operation of heaven and earth must also follow the patterns of waxing and waning.

Observing natural phenomena: Water, the softest of elements, flows east when guided east and west when guided west, yet it can erode the hardest substances. The wind appears gentle, yet it can topple towering trees. This demonstrates that accumulating numerous small "non-victories" can ultimately achieve great triumph. Thus, Laozi advocates: knowing strength yet abiding in softness, understanding prominence yet willingly dwelling in obscurity, allowing others to rush ahead while remaining behind, neither contending with others nor striving to lead—this is the path of enduring victory.

The Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue) repeatedly emphasizes this principle of the soft overcoming the hard: it speaks of "guarding softness" and "arriving at softness," opposes forceful contention for victory, and asserts that the violently aggressive meet untimely ends. Zhuangzi similarly advocates manifesting outward softness and humility. When Confucius answered Zilu's question about "strength," he also mentioned using gentle and tolerant methods to teach others and not retaliating against unreasonable behavior—this exemplifies the southerners' "strength," which aligns with Laozi's way of preserving softness. Who then can claim that Laozi's thought is incompatible with Confucius' Dao?

Emperor Huizong of Song, in his commentary on this passage, noted: The great Dao itself is perfectly balanced, yet when manifested in concrete things, it operates like the four seasons—advancing when it should advance, retreating when it should retreat, maintaining dynamic equilibrium. The Dao embraces all things; whether employed or not, it fills heaven and earth without increase or decrease. Once it materializes as the myriad things, it becomes constrained by form and Qi (vital energy), transforming into the movement and changes of Qi.

 所化麗於數而爲數之所攝一盈一虚莫  或已也惟道超乎氣數而爲萬物之奥故  有氣有數者皆往資焉而不匱是以注焉  而不滿雖益之而不加益也酌焉而不竭  雖損之而不加損也既以爲人己愈有既  以與人己愈多聖人之所保在是人不得  而去者也且域中之大天地與焉天地雖  大然斗一南而萬物盈斗一北而萬物虚  消之而消息之而息或消或息與時偕行  凡以天地空中之一物猶未離於氣數故  也夫天地盈虚與時消息而況於人乎然  則盛衰更代成壞相因固不逃於自然之  理矣惟天道任理而均故無適而不得其  中若山殺瘦而澤增肥水息淵而木消枝  嘖以牙者童其角揮以翼者兩其足高者  惡其亢則抑之使俯而就不至於有餘而  太過下者惡其卑則舉之使企而及不至  於不足將來者進成功者退如彼四時春  夏先秋冬後徙而不留各得其序莫不趨  於中焉觀天之道豈不猶張弓乎 天之道損有餘補不足  徽宗註曰滿招損謙得益時乃天道  䟽義曰易曰天道虧盈而益謙蓋盈者虧  之所謂損有餘也謙者益之所謂補不足  也損有餘以補不足則以其化均故爾書  以謂滿招損謙得益時天道其斯之謂歟 人之道則不然損不足以奉有餘  徽宗註曰人心排下而進上虐煢獨而畏  高明
Interpretation

All things in the world are governed by natural cycles, flourishing and declining in perpetual motion. Only the Dao transcends these natural laws, serving as the fundamental source of all existence. All beings rely on the Dao for their existence, yet the Dao itself never diminishes—no matter how much is poured into it, it never overflows; no matter how much is given, it never increases; no matter how much is taken, it never depletes; no matter how much is reduced, it never lessens.

The sages understood this principle: the more they helped others, the more abundant they became; the more they gave to others, the more they possessed. This wisdom is the foundation of the sage—something no one can take away. Though heaven and earth are vast, they too change according to the movement of the Northern Dipper: when its handle points south, all things flourish; when it points north, all things decline. The waxing and waning of the myriad things in heaven and earth follow the passage of time, for they remain bound by natural laws. If even heaven and earth are subject to this, how much more so are human beings? Prosperity and decline, success and failure—these are simply the way of nature.

The Dao of heaven operates according to natural principles, always maintaining balance. Just as high mountains are worn down and valleys are filled in, deep waters dry up and trees shed their leaves. Creatures with sharp teeth often lack horns, and winged beings usually have only two legs. The Dao of heaven is like adjusting a bowstring: what is raised too high is lowered to avoid excess; what is pressed too low is lifted to avoid deficiency. Like the turning of the four seasons—spring and summer precede autumn and winter, each keeping to its proper time—all things ultimately return to equilibrium. Is this not the same principle as drawing a bow to shoot an arrow?

Thus, the law of the Dao of heaven is this: it reduces what is excessive and supplements what is lacking. As Emperor Huizong of Song commented, "Self-satisfaction invites loss, while humility brings benefit—this is the Dao of heaven." The Yijing (Book of Changes) states, "The Dao of heaven diminishes the full to benefit the humble," expressing precisely this idea. Only by reducing surplus to supplement deficiency can balance be achieved. The Shangshu (Book of Documents) says, "Fullness invites loss; humility receives benefit," speaking of this very principle of the heavenly Dao.

Yet the ways of men are contrary to this: they often take from those who have little to give to those who have much. Emperor Huizong noted in his commentary: human hearts tend to reject the humble while flattering the powerful, oppressing the weak while fearing the prominent.

 䟽義曰莫之爲而自然者天道也爲之而  使然者人道也天道之與人道相去遠矣  惟人道累於使然故人心惟危莫得其平  下者排之使愈下上者進之使愈上逐物  俯仰而無持操所以虐煢獨而畏高明也  煢獨可哀也苟或見虐則莫勸其作德而  爲善者孰爲之長高明可藐也苟或見畏  則莫懲其作僞而爲惡者孰爲之消是乃  損不足以奉有餘而已豈知自然之天道  乎 孰能損有餘而奉不足於天下者其唯道乎  徽宗註曰不虐煢獨而罄者與之不畏高  明而饒者損之非有道者不能  䟽義曰煢獨者衆之所違而虐之苟曰好  德則雖煢獨必進寵之而不虐是罄者與  之也高明者衆之所比而畏之苟不好德  則雖高明必罪廢之而不畏是饒者取之  也誠如是其知道乎蓋道者爲之公不偏  於彼不廢於此泛應曲當考不平以至於  平聖人體是以用天下孰有偏詖之患哉  然則損有餘以奉不足非與於天道孰能  致此莊子曰主者天道 是以聖人爲而不恃功成不居其不欲見賢 耶  徽宗註曰不恃其爲故無自伐之心不居  其功故無自滿之志人皆飾智己獨若愚  人皆求勝己獨曲全帷不欲見賢也故常  无損得天之道  疏義曰至無之中化出萬有聖人體至无  以供其求豈恃其爲哉𩐎萬物而不爲義
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the distinction between the Way of Heaven (Dao) and the way of humans, and how sages emulate celestial principles to govern the world.

The Way of Heaven operates through spontaneous natural laws, while human ways stem from artificial constructs—these differ profoundly. Human governance persistently clings to forced intervention, causing imbalance in people's hearts—the lowly are further oppressed while the privileged are excessively elevated. Chasing external objects and drifting with the current, people lose their moral bearings. This creates a society where the vulnerable are mistreated while the powerful are feared.

The destitute are already pitiable; if further abused, none will be willing to practice virtue. The powerful deserve respect, but if they inspire fear instead, no one can restrain their wrongdoing. This resembles cutting from the insufficient to feed the excessive, completely violating natural Dao. Only the Dao can reduce surplus to supplement deficiency.

Emperor Huizong of Song commented: Only those who have attained the Dao can refrain from oppressing the vulnerable while offering them aid, and refuse to fear the powerful while curtailing their privileges. Those who embody Dao handle affairs with perfect fairness, without partiality—this is how sages govern without bias.

Zhuangzi declared the Way of Heaven the supreme standard. Therefore, sages act without claiming credit, achieve without dwelling on accomplishments, and avoid flaunting their wisdom. Transforming all things within emptiness, sages emulate this void to fulfill all needs, never boasting of their deeds. Nourishing myriad beings without claiming benevolence—this marks the realm of those who have attained Dao.

Through contrasting celestial and human ways, this text emphasizes that rulers should model themselves on natural Dao, maintaining impartial selflessness—neither bullying the weak nor fearing the strong—to preserve social harmony through balanced governance.

 澤萬世而不爲仁孰有自伐之心乎所謂  至爲去爲者以此豈居其功哉功蓋天下  似不自己去功與名還與衆人孰有自滿  之志乎所謂神人無功者以此去智與故  循天之理君子盛德容貌若愚所謂人皆  飾智己獨若愚也與物委蛇而同其波積  衆小不勝爲大勝所謂人皆求勝己獨曲  全也凡以不欲見賢故也列禦寇驚五漿  之饋有在於是耶帷不欲見賢故謙得益  而常無損其得天之道矣與夫飾智驚愚  修身明汙昭昭然若揭日月而行故不免  者蓋亦異矣    天下柔弱章第七十八 天下莫柔弱於水而攻堅强者莫之能先以 其無以易之也  徽宗註曰易以井喻性言其不改老氏謂  水幾於道以其無以易之也有以易之則  徇人而失己烏能勝物惟無以易之故萬  變而常一物無得而勝之者  䟽義曰水由地中行無所不通鑿之斯爲  井道之在天下無往不存得之則爲性故  易以井喻性井養而不窮改邑不改井則  以一性之常不以貴賤加損不以愚智存  亡雖事變無常而其本不易猶之井也蓋  天一生水離道未遠善利萬物萬物蒙其  澤受其施而常處於柔弱不爭之地舉天  下之物曾無以易之故老氏謂水幾於道  以其無以易之也彼物得以易之則是徇  人失己而失性之常烏能得常勝之道而
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the core Daoist principle that "the soft and weak overcome the hard and strong," using the characteristics of water as a metaphor for the wisdom of those who have attained the Dao (the Way).

Though water appears soft and yielding, it can penetrate the hardest substances precisely because it maintains its unchanging nature ("wu yi zhi" - without alteration). If one attempts to substitute water's essential qualities with other attributes, its true nature would be lost, rendering it incapable of overcoming external objects. Just as a well's water nourishes all things yet never exhausts itself, regardless of how villages may change around it, the well's fundamental nature remains constant. Human nature follows this same principle - it should not be altered by one's social status or level of wisdom.

Those who have truly attained the Dao (shenren - spiritual persons) never claim credit for themselves but attribute accomplishments to the collective. They conceal their wisdom, appearing dull and simple in outward manner ("rongmao ruo yu" - countenance like a fool), yet in reality they skillfully adapt to the transformations of all things. Like accumulating numerous small concessions to ultimately achieve great victory, this approach of "yielding leads to wholeness" succeeds precisely because it avoids deliberate displays of ability.

The text criticizes those who flaunt their intelligence and pursue novelty ("shi zhi jing yu" - adorning wisdom to startle the foolish), comparing them to someone carrying the sun and moon while walking - overly conspicuous and thus prone to inviting misfortune. In contrast, figures like Lie Yukou (a Daoist sage) who maintained humility and discretion, though refusing generous gifts, preserved their fundamental nature from harm. This exemplifies the way of natural harmony.

The passage concludes by emphasizing how water's proximity to the Dao ("ji yu dao" - nearly approaches the Way) stems from its soft, yielding and non-contentious nature - nourishing all things without claiming merit. Those who attain the Dao similarly maintain their unchanging essence amidst life's fluctuations, thereby achieving the state where "the soft and weak overcome the hard and strong."

 能勝物哉惟無以易之則因地而爲曲直  因器而爲方圓雖有曲折萬殊之變而一  常自若可謂物無得而勝之者矣 柔之勝剛弱之勝强天下莫不知而莫之能 行  徽宗註曰知及之仁不能守之  䟽義曰智所以窮理仁所以盡性蓋天下  之事知之非艱行之惟艱苟智足以窮理  而仁不足以盡性則是猒於所守無持乆  之誠其何以行之哉柔勝剛弱勝强世俗  之人智非不足以知之常患於不篤志以  存之故爾知及之仁不能守之雖得之必  失之其何益於事哉經曰吾言甚易知甚  易行而天下莫能知莫能行與此同意 是以聖人言受國之垢是謂社稷主受國之 不祥是爲天下王  徽宗註曰川澤納汙山藪藏疾國君含垢  體道之虚而所受彌廣則爲物之歸而所  制彌遠經曰知其榮守其辱爲天下谷  疏義曰水始一勺總合成川故江河合水  而爲大土始一塊總合成田故丘山積卑  而爲高積善成德而神明自得聖心循焉  故大人合并而爲公傳所謂川澤納汙山  藪藏疾國君含垢正謂是也蓋天下雖大  治之在道四海雖遠治之在心唯道集虚  而聖人之治虚其心焉故能體道之虚群  實皆在所攝所受彌廣惟爲物之歸則萬  物皆往資焉而所制彌遠蓋五土之神爲  社五穀之神爲稷爲社稷主必欲滿而不
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist principle that "the soft and weak overcome the hard and strong." Water adapts to the shape of any container, appearing gentle yet capable of wearing through solid rock. While all people under heaven know that softness conquers hardness and weakness overcomes strength, few truly practice it.

Emperor Huizong of Song's commentary notes that mere intellectual understanding of the principle is insufficient—one must uphold it with virtuous De (Power). Many comprehend this truth yet fail to persevere due to weak resolve. As the scripture states: "My words are exceedingly easy to understand and practice, yet none in the world can understand or practice them"—this precisely illustrates the point.

Therefore, the sages declared: Only those who can endure a nation's humiliation are worthy to be lords of the altars of soil and grain (rulers of states); only those who can bear a country's calamities may become kings of the world. Just as rivers tolerate impurities and mountains conceal venomous creatures, rulers too must embrace imperfections with magnanimity.

Water's strength comes from accumulating droplets; earth's height arises from gathering dust particles. In governing the world, sages maintain a mindset as open and receptive as an empty valley. When the spirits of the Five Directions safeguard the altars of state and the deities of the Five Graces bless the harvests, rulers must preserve humility and inclusiveness—only then can all beings return to them, and their reign endure with stability.

 溢高而不危非受國之垢不可也與莊子  所謂受天下之垢同意興事造業而其一  上比爲王故王以歸往爲義爲天下王必  欲持其盈而不溢守其成而不虧非受國  不祥不可也與經所謂人之所惡唯孤寡  不穀而王公以爲稱同意夫受國之垢也  受國之不祥也皆榮辱一視而無取捨之  心故也要之虚而能受而已故道經言知  其榮守其辱爲天下谷 正言若反  徽宗註曰言豈一端而已反於物而合於  道是謂天下之至正  䟽義曰道惡乎往而不存言惡乎存而不  可一與言爲二二與一爲三自此以往巧  歷不能得則言豈一端而已然至言不出  而俗言勝故有堅白異同之論芒然不知  所歸天下始以正言爲反於物矣惟得言  之解者雖反於物而合於道則言而足終  曰言而盡道天下之至正孰有過於斯者  莊子以寓言爲眞蓋謂是也    和大怨章第七十九 和大怨者必有餘怨安可以爲善  徽宗註曰復讎者不折鏌千雖有忮心者  不怨飄瓦故無餘怨愛人者害人之本也  偃兵者造兵之本也安可以爲善  䟽義曰鏌千無心於傷物故復讎者不折  飄瓦無心於觸物故忮心者不怨常有司  者殺則人之遇之猶鏌千飄瓦而已是以  天下平均故無餘怨且仁者愛人故惡人  之害之義者循理故惡人之亂之若乃以
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses two core concepts: first, how rulers maintain stability by bearing the nation's humiliations and calamities; second, why forcibly mediating deep-seated hatred inevitably leaves hidden dangers.

Regarding statecraft, the text explains that a ruler wishing to preserve the nation's strength without decline must endure its humiliations (referring to public grievances and criticism) and misfortunes (referring to natural and man-made disasters) like the ocean receiving all rivers. This echoes Zhuangzi's notion of "bearing the world's filth," akin to ancient lords calling themselves "the solitary one" or "the bereft"—resolving conflicts through voluntary humility. Truly enlightened rulers perceive honor and disgrace as one, maintaining a mind free from discrimination, ever open and receptive. The Daode Jing states: "Know honor but keep to disgrace"—seemingly paradoxical (truth often appears contradictory), yet perfectly aligned with the Dao (the Way).

Emperor Huizong of Song noted in his commentary that profound truths often appear counterintuitive. People frequently mistake Dao-aligned teachings for paradoxes, much like Zhuangzi conveyed truth through parables. The most penetrating discourse, though sounding unconventional, comes closest to heavenly principles.

Concerning conflict resolution, the text warns that forcibly reconciling deep hatred ("harmonizing great enmity") inevitably leaves residues. Just as avengers don't blame mindless swords or tiles—mere tools, not instigators—the scripture cautions: excessive emphasis on benevolence may become the root of harm ("loving others breeds the seeds of harming them"), and superficial conflict resolution sows greater strife ("suppressing arms plants the seeds of war"). The ideal approach is for law enforcers to act impartially like mindless swords or tiles, preventing resentment and naturally achieving peace. Benevolence may provoke hatred; righteousness may incite chaos—these seemingly virtuous actions don't necessarily resolve issues.

 聰合驩是愛人者害人之本也禁攻寢兵  是偃兵者造兵之本也以此和大怨其爲  善果安在哉 是以聖人執左契而不責於人  徽宗註曰聖人循大變而無所湮受而喜  之故無責於人人亦無責焉契有左右以  别取予執左契者予之而已  䟽義曰聖人虚己以遊世萬態雖雜而吾  心常徹萬變雖殊而吾心常寂感而遂通  天下之故直以循斯須而已虚靜之中何  所湮汨莊子所謂循大變而無所湮是也  故能泛應酬酢受而喜之未嘗棄人絶物  恝然自立於無事之地也爲無爲事無事  處物不傷物而物亦不能傷是以執左契  而不責於人人亦無責焉古者結繩而治  後世聖人易之以書契百官以治萬民以  察然契有左右左契所以予右契所以取  執左契則不從事於物予之而已雖予之  而不責於人則物之來也不約而自孚矣 故有德司契  徽宗註曰以德分人謂之聖  䟽義曰德之在人同焉皆得不可擅而有  之者也聖人調而應之德廣所及以心之  所同然還以分之而已則人之契合者固  不期然而然矣莊子載管子之言曰以德  分人謂之聖此之謂也荀卿亦曰君子潔  其辯而同焉者合善其言而類焉者應意  與此同  無德司徹  徽宗註曰樂通物非聖人也無德者不自  得其得而得人之得方且物物求通而有
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the fundamental distinction between how sages conduct themselves in the world and how ordinary people behave. The clever appear friendly with others, yet this very closeness becomes the root of harm; forcibly prohibiting conflicts and abolishing weapons only breeds new conflicts. How can such methods possibly resolve deep-seated grievances with favorable outcomes?

The true sage who has attained the Dao (referring to enlightened beings) is like holding the left half of a contract (ancient agreements were divided into left and right portions, with the left tally held by creditors) yet never demanding repayment. Emperor Huizong of Song explains: The sage harmonizes with natural transformations without disturbance, joyfully accepting all things, thus neither harshly blaming others nor being blamed himself. Holding the left tally symbolizes giving rather than taking.

Further commentary elaborates: Sages dwell in the world with minds clear as empty space—though facing complex phenomena, their inner clarity remains undisturbed; experiencing various changes, their hearts stay tranquil. They flow with the present moment, abiding in serene emptiness without obstruction. As Zhuangzi says, "Following the great transformations without impediment," they thus respond to all things with ease, embracing everything without rejection. Governing through wuwei (non-action, allowing natural unfoldment without force), they handle affairs without harming external things, and external things cannot harm them. Ancient people recorded events with knotted ropes; later sages replaced these with contractual documents for administration. The left tally represents giving, the right tally represents taking—the sage holding only the left means solely giving without taking. Thus all things naturally return with sincere hearts.

Those possessing De (Virtue, referring to individuals of noble character) resemble sages who administer contracts. Emperor Huizong quotes Guanzi: "Transforming others through Virtue is the way of sages." The commentary adds: Virtuous nature is inherent in all people; sages simply use this shared nature to transform others, thus achieving natural harmony. Xunzi similarly states that noble persons unite with others through clarity and wisdom, responding to kindred spirits with good words—the meaning aligns here.

Those lacking De (referring to the uncultivated) are entirely different. Emperor Huizong observes: "Indulging in external things is not the sage's way." The virtue-less remain unsatisfied with what they have, constantly seeking to possess others' belongings, scheming and calculating at every turn.

 和怨之心焉兹徹也秪所以爲蔽莊子曰  喪己於物者謂之蔽蒙之民  䟽義曰凡物之量未始有窮物物求通繁  不勝應則智有所困神有所不及矣聖人  去智與故而循天理順物自然而無容私  感而後應皆縁於不得已豈樂通於物哉  彼昧者不能以深爲根以約爲紀逐物忘  返不自得其得而得人之得弊弊然以通  物爲事而有和怨之心將以爲徹秪所以  爲蔽莊子所謂樂通物非聖人也不其然  乎蓋樂通物則因物有遷或至於失己其  爲蔽蒙孰甚故莊子曰喪己於物者謂之  蔽蒙之民蓋蔽以言其不通蒙以言其不  明累於物而有礙孰能損實爲通致虚爲  明哉 天道無親常與善人  徽宗註曰善則與之何親之有  䟽義曰天道任理奚親奚疏天道無私奚  取奚予雖無私於取予其因物以爲心唯  善人是與而已蓋天聰明自我民聰明善  人之所從民則從之宜其常與善人也書  曰作善降之百祥又曰皇天無親惟德是  輔蓋以積善成德故天有以與之也是篇  言執左契而終之以天道以見聖人與天  同道焉惟其道與天同此洞酌之詩所以  言  皇天親有德饗有道也    小國寡民章第八十 小國寡民  徽宗註曰廣土衆民則事不勝應智不勝  察德自此衰刑自此起後世之亂自此始  矣老氏當周之末猒周之亂原道之意寓
Interpretation

This passage discusses two core concepts: the relationship between humans and external things, and the relationship between the Dao of Heaven and virtuous people.

First, it explains the concept of "being obscured and deluded." Zhuangzi states that those who lose themselves in pursuit of external things are called "the obscured and deluded people." Ordinary individuals constantly chase endless external objects, attempting to comprehend all things, only to find their wisdom exhausted and spirit depleted. In contrast, sages (those who have attained the Dao) discard cleverness and preconceptions, follow natural laws without selfish motives, and only respond to external things when absolutely necessary. The deluded, however, mistake the pursuit of external things as life's purpose, even entertaining notions of reconciling grievances, believing themselves enlightened when in fact this represents the greatest delusion. Zhuangzi clearly points out that obsession with external things leads to the loss of one's true self—this is genuine obscuration.

Next, it addresses "the Dao of Heaven shows no favoritism, yet always supports the virtuous." The Dao of Heaven (natural law) makes no distinctions between closeness and distance; it simply follows principle. Though impartial, it nevertheless favors virtuous people. This is because the will of Heaven manifests through the will of the people, and since the people follow the virtuous, the Dao of Heaven naturally supports them as well. The Book of Documents states, "Performing good deeds brings a hundred blessings," and "Heaven has no favorites—it supports only those with virtue," both illustrating that accumulating good deeds attracts the favor of the Dao of Heaven. This aligns with the earlier metaphor of "holding the left tally" (symbolizing keeping one's word), demonstrating the harmony between sages and the Dao of Heaven.

Finally, the passage on "small states with sparse populations" observes that in large territories with dense populations, governance becomes overwhelming, wisdom proves insufficient, virtue declines, punishments proliferate, and chaos ensues. Laozi, living during the decline of the Zhou dynasty, despised such disorder, which is why his writings express his reflections on the Dao.

Note: The "left tally" refers to an ancient contract system where creditors held the left half of the tally and debtors the right, here symbolizing keeping one's word. "Small states with sparse populations" describes Laozi's ideal social structure, advocating a return to simplicity.

 之於書方且易文勝之弊俗而躋之淳厚  之域故以小國寡民爲言蓋至德之世自  容成氏至于神農十有二君號稱至治者  以此而已  䟽義曰普天之下莫非王土率土之濱莫  非王臣則土宇彌廣生齒益衆皆不離於  丕冒之域而此必取於小制國寡聚民者  何耶蓋以廣土衆民巧僞日滋事則繁而  不勝應智以詐而不勝察遷德淫性觸刑  冒禁後世所以不治者皆自此始矣老氏  憫當時習俗凋弊乃推原道德發明奥義  寓之於書以破聾聵直欲易周末文勝之  弊俗還太古淳厚之風斂其散而一之落  其華而實之故以小國寡民爲言自容成  氏大庭氏至于伏羲氏神農氏十有二君  號稱至治者亦使民無知無欲而已同乎  無知其德不離同乎無欲是謂素樸若此  之時亦至治已老氏立言垂訓亦欲斯民  復乎古初者也故及於此 使民有什伯之器而不用也  徽宗註曰一而不黨無衆至之累  䟽義曰彼民有常性織而衣耕而食是謂  同德惟其同德則無所事比而自養者已  足所謂一而不黨者也蓋一者性之所同  而不黨者無所事比同而無所比則相忘  於澹漠之域民至老死不相往來雖有什  伯之器無所用焉又烏有衆至之累耶是  以神人惡衆至衆至則不比舜三徙成都  至鄧之墟而十有萬家樂推不猒衆至而
Interpretation

This passage explores the profound meaning behind Laozi's concept of "small states with sparse populations" in the Dao De Jing. The author suggests that Laozi advocated this idea because he recognized the detrimental effects of the overly complex ritual-music system during the late Zhou dynasty.

Moved by the moral decay of his time, Laozi traced back to the primordial origins of Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue), expounding profound principles in his writings to counteract the superficial extravagance of the late Zhou era and return to the simplicity of antiquity. From ancient sage-rulers like Rongchengshi and Datingshi to Fuxishi and Shennongshi, the reigns of these twelve sovereigns were considered the most perfect governance precisely because they allowed people to remain in a state of no-knowledge and no-desire, collectively returning to unadorned naturalness.

The text explains the line "though the people have tools ten times more efficient, they do not use them" thus: People inherently possess constant natural tendencies—weaving clothes and farming for food represent their shared nature. Because this nature is universal, there's no need for competition, and contentment arises spontaneously. This embodies the meaning of "being unified without forming factions." Unity lies in humanity's common ground, while avoiding factions stems from having no need for mutual dependence. Thus, people forget each other in the realm of tranquility—even with abundant tools at hand, none are used. How could there then be the disturbances of crowded gatherings?

Therefore, sages always disliked large gatherings, for crowds inevitably breed comparison. Like Emperor Shun, who relocated his capital three times—when he reached Dengxu, a hundred thousand households followed him. Though the masses revered him, this very adoration brought troubles. Laozi's approach to governance seeks to return people to their most authentic state of being.

 歸之舜不容於辭焉蓋所以感而應之者  特塵垢粃糠帝王之餘事爾若乃有天下  而不與坐致無爲之治非至神而何 使民重死而不遠徙  徽宗註曰其生可樂其死可葬故民不輕  死而之四方孔子曰上失其道民散乆矣  遠徙之謂歟  䟽義曰凡民之情莫大乎養生喪死無憾  也其生可樂則仰事俯育有所給其死可  葬則衣衾棺槨有所備無欣欣之樂無瘁  瘁之苦又烏有輕死而不安土者哉周之  盛時以保息六養萬民而貧窮得以恤以  本俗六安萬民而墳墓爲之族五黨足以  相賙四閭足以相葬出耕同田入居同廛  利則同營害則同禦民不輕徙而之四方  者亦以生可樂死可葬而已又況建德之  國其民愚而樸少私而寡欲山無蹊隧澤  無舟梁則其重死而不之四方也宜矣然  而民不難聚也愛之則親利之則至致其  所惡則散治古之民所以重死而不遠徙  者以上得其道有以愛之利之故也孔子  曰上失其道民散乆矣則民不遠徙非得  其道而何 雖有舟輿無所乗之雖有甲兵無所陳之  徽宗註曰山無蹊隧澤無舟梁同乎無知  其德不離無絶險之迹故雖有舟輿無所  乗之無攻戰之患故雖有甲兵無所陳之  䟽義曰性分之外無非物也與物爲偶則  外游是務欲慮滋起轉徙馳逐莫之或已
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the ideal governance philosophy in the Daode Jing. The reason Emperor Shun could transform his people was that he focused on fundamental matters rather than trivial affairs. A truly enlightened ruler governs through Wuwei (non-action), enabling the people to live in peace and contentment.

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: When people can dwell securely during their lives and receive proper burials after death, they naturally won't lightly abandon their homeland. Confucius said, "When rulers lose the Dao (the Way), the people become dispersed"—precisely referring to this situation.

Further explanation clarifies: The people's most fundamental needs are living well and being buried properly. During the golden age of the Zhou dynasty, the government nurtured the populace through six social welfare policies (ancient social security system) and stabilized communities with six grassroots governance measures. Neighbors helped each other in shared farming and living, making people naturally reluctant to migrate. In the ideal "Land of Established Virtue," folk customs remained simple with few desires—where mountain paths remained untrodden and marsh bridges unbuilt—making people even less inclined to leave their ancestral homes.

The key principle is that people are actually easy to gather: cherish them and they draw near, benefit them and they follow, but make them resentful and they scatter. Ancient people's unwillingness to migrate stemmed precisely from rulers practicing the Dao and cherishing their subjects. Confucius' saying "When rulers lose the Dao, the people become dispersed" conversely illustrates that settled populations result from rulers embodying the Dao.

Though the state possesses chariots and boats, they remain unused; though armaments exist, they need not be displayed. Emperor Huizong explains: This is because without treacherous mountain paths or marsh crossings, people maintain their simple nature with no need to traverse dangers—thus vehicles go unused. Without threats of war, weapons find no purpose.

Additional commentary notes: All beyond human nature constitutes externalities—attachment to which breeds desires, causing restless toil without peace. An ideal society should return to original simplicity, letting people abide contentedly in their essential nature.

 有以致遠則山必蹊隧而通有以涉難則  澤必舟梁而濟雖欲休影息迹不可得矣  惟至德之世民復其性山無蹊隧澤無舟  梁而不相往來同乎無知其德不離而復  歸於嬰兒居不知所爲行不知所之平易  恬惔無絶險之迹故雖有舟輿無所乗之  是非兩忘無攻戰之患故雖有甲兵無所  陳之亦各安其性分而已 使民復結繩而用之  徽宗註曰紀要而已不假書契  䟽義曰法之在天下必有以記乆明遠以  貽將來者故上古結繩而治後世聖人易  之以書契謂夫言有所不能紀則證之於  書事有所不能信則别之以契至於治極  無爲民淳事簡則附離不以膠漆約束不  以纏索方且當而不知以爲信雖結繩以  紀其要已足以孚天下之心又何假書契  之詳密然後使民不相欺哉所以復結繩  而用之者欲還民於太古而已 甘其食美其服安其俗樂其業  徽宗註曰耕而食織而衣含哺而嬉鼓腹  而遊民能已此矣止分故甘去華故美不  擾故安存生故樂  䟽義曰民復性則棄末棄末則敦本不作  無益不貴異物所賴以終身者田桑之事  而已是以耕而食則穀人一於耕織而衣  則絲人一於織日出而作日入而息智巧  無所施也日用飲食而已故含哺而嬉利  害無所攖也自適其適而已故鼓腹而遊
Interpretation

To reach distant lands, mountains must be tunneled through; to cross treacherous waters, marshes must be bridged. Even those who wish to withdraw from the world find it difficult to achieve. Only in an era of perfect virtue (De) can people return to their original purity—when tunnels through mountains and bridges over rivers become unnecessary, and people live without interaction, as if in a state of innocent simplicity.

Human virtue does not stray from its innate truth, returning to the simplicity of an infant’s nature. At rest, they know not what to do; in motion, they know not where to go. Life is tranquil and uncomplicated, free from perilous paths. Thus, though chariots and boats may exist, there is no need to use them. When disputes and conflicts are forgotten, the calamities of war vanish—so though armor and weapons may exist, there is no occasion to display them. Each person remains content within their own station.

Let the people return to the practice of knotting ropes to record events. Emperor Huizong of Song comments: It is enough to note the essentials; there is no need for cumbersome written contracts. The subcommentary explains: Governing the world requires methods of record-keeping. In ancient times, knotted ropes sufficed; later, the sages replaced them with written contracts. When speech could not be recorded, writing was invented; when trust could not be secured, contracts were established. But in the perfection of non-action (Wuwei), customs are pure and affairs simple. Bonds require no glue or lacquer, and restraint needs no ropes—people naturally trust one another. At such a time, knotted ropes are enough to secure the faith of all under heaven. Why resort to elaborate contracts to guard against deceit? The return to knotted ropes is meant to restore the people to the pristine simplicity of antiquity.

The people find their food sweet, their clothing beautiful, their customs peaceful, and their occupations joyful. Emperor Huizong annotates: They plow for food, weave for clothing, play with food in their mouths, and wander content after eating—this is enough for the people. Content with their lot, they find it sweet; free from extravagance, they find it beautiful; undisturbed, they find peace; secure in their livelihood, they find joy. The subcommentary explains: When the people return to their true nature, they discard trivialities and focus on essentials. They do not engage in useless pursuits or crave exotic things, devoting their lives solely to farming and weaving. Those who plow are fed, so all devote themselves to farming; those who weave are clothed, so all devote themselves to spinning. They rise with the sun and rest at dusk, with no room for clever schemes—merely satisfying their daily needs. Playing with food in their mouths, untouched by profit or harm, they wander in carefree delight.

 民之能事已此矣於是甘其食美其服安  其俗樂其業四者之外無餘事也甘其食  在於止分不在於猒飲食美其服在於去  華不在於服文采安其俗於不擾無妄動  之失樂其業以自足無歆羡之求非民復  其性何以臻此 鄰國相望雞犬之聲相聞使民至老死不相 與往來  徽宗註曰居相比也聲相聞也而不相與  往來當是時也無欲無求莫之爲而常自  然此之謂至德  䟽義曰居相比則其迹爲甚親聲相聞則  其處爲甚邇宜其相保相受相賙相賔也  乃至於澹然兩忘至老死不相往來者不  知禮之所將相與於無相與故爾雖山無  蹊隧澤無舟梁可也性復樸而無欲心忘  物而無求莫之爲而常自然非至德而何  老子於太上章言百姓謂我自然蓋於太  上之治既言百姓謂我自然則知至德之  世民莫之爲而常自然者無足疑矣    信言不美章第八十一 信言不美  徽宗註曰道之出口淡乎其無味關百聖  而不慙歷萬世而無弊  䟽義曰道非言無以闡其奥言非道無以  立其本道之出言淡乎無味根於理義不  特芻豢之甘膏粱之美也可操以爲驗可  稽以爲决合若符節正而易行故關百聖  而不慙堅如金石要而易守故歷萬世無  弊然則信言之本乎道又何貴於美耶 美言不信  徽宗註曰貌言華也從事華辭以支爲㫖
Interpretation

This passage speaks of what people can truly achieve—being content with their food, clothing, customs, and occupations. Contentment in food does not lie in lavishness but in moderation; the beauty of clothing is not in extravagance but in simplicity; stability in customs means not arbitrarily changing them, avoiding the fault of reckless action; joy in one's work comes from satisfaction, free from the greed of envying others. If people had not returned to their original nature, how could they reach such a state?

Neighboring states are close enough to see each other, and the sounds of crowing roosters and barking dogs can be heard from one to the other, yet the people grow old and die without ever interacting. Emperor Huizong of Song comments that although they live so near and their sounds reach each other, they do not visit one another. In this state, people have no desires or greed, act without deliberate effort, and everything unfolds naturally—this is the highest virtue (De). The commentary explains that even though they live close enough to assist and interact, they remain indifferent, growing old and dying without contact. This is because they have forgotten the constraints of ritual and relate to one another spontaneously. Even if there are no mountain paths or bridges over rivers, it does not matter. When their nature returns to simplicity, free from desire, and their minds forget external things, free from greed, they act without striving, and everything happens naturally—what could this be if not the highest virtue? Laozi says in the Supreme Chapter that the people find everything natural. If under the best governance they feel this way, then in an age of supreme virtue, where people act without deliberate effort and all unfolds naturally, this should come as no surprise.

Chapter 81 states that truthful words are not ornate. Emperor Huizong notes that when the Dao (the Way) is spoken, it is plain and flavorless, yet it leaves the sages of all ages without shame and remains timeless through the ages. The commentary explains that the Dao relies on words to clarify its profundity, and words must be rooted in the Dao. Spoken plainly and without embellishment, the Dao originates in principle and righteousness, unlike delicacies that delight the palate. It can be verified, it can resolve doubts—fitting together like tally tokens, correct and easy to follow, which is why the sages of all ages feel no shame before it. Firm as metal or stone, simple and easy to uphold, it remains unchanged through ten thousand generations. Since truthful words are grounded in the Dao, why should they seek ornamentation?

Ornate words are not truthful. Emperor Huizong remarks that superficial speech is adorned, using flowery language to fragment the essence.

 故不足於信  䟽義曰貌言無實無實者華而已故貌言  爲華而至言爲實從事華辭殆非辭達以  支爲㫖殆非體要若然則去道彌遠雖終  日言而盡道足以美聞者之聽求其根柢  蔑如也將何以示信哉故不足於信 善者不辯  徽宗註曰辭尚體要言而當法  䟽義曰趣完具而已謂之體衆體所會謂  之要辭以體要爲尚則得道之大全而貫  於至理以此立言莫不當法雖不假辯論  而精義具存已足以猒人之可欲是謂善  者不辯也昔孔子繙十二經而曰要在仁  義孟子學孔子者也不得已而有言而曰  予豈好辯哉其言有曰博學而詳說之將  以反說約而楊雄以謂知言之要其善者  不辯之謂歟 辯者不善  徽宗註曰多駢旁枝而失天下之至正  䟽義曰多言數窮不如守中蓋辯道之囿  言多而未免夫累不如守中之愈也不能  守中則多駢旁枝而畔於道非天下至正  也如公孫龍之詭辭惠施之多方殆猶一  蚉蝱之勞爾此所以爲不善 知者不博  徽宗註曰知道之微者反要而已  疏義曰道要不煩知其微者悟於一言存  於目擊少則得之何以博爲經曰博之不  得名曰微探其微則無形而隱矣惟反要  而語極者然後可以知此莊子曰知之淺  矣不知深矣 博者不知  徽宗註曰聞見之多不如其約也莊子曰
Interpretation

This passage discusses the relationship between words and truth. It suggests that superficially ornate language often lacks substantive content, like flowers without fruit. If one becomes obsessed with embellishing phrases and pursuing elaborate expressions, they may deviate from the essence of the Dao (the Way). Speaking beautifully all day may please listeners, but upon closer examination, such words prove hollow—how can they inspire genuine trust? Hence the saying "not worthy of belief" (不足于信).

Those who truly understand the Dao (the Way) do not need clever arguments. Emperor Huizong's commentary notes that the value of words lies in grasping their essential meaning. The so-called "substance" (体) refers to complete expression, while the "essence" (要) is the convergence point of all elements. Mastering this principle allows one to speak in harmony with the great Dao (the Way). Even without engaging in debates, the profound truths they convey naturally satisfy people's thirst for knowledge. Just as Confucius emphasized "benevolence and righteousness" (仁义) as the core when editing the classics, Mencius—though compelled to debate—claimed he did so not out of fondness for argument but to clarify essential truths. Yang Xiong's phrase "knowing the essence of speech" (知言之要) refers precisely to this state of inspiring belief without resorting to contention.

Those who revel in debate do not truly comprehend the Dao (the Way). Huizong's commentary observes that excessive words are like superfluous branches on a tree, leading one astray from the proper path. Laozi said that speaking too much often leads to trouble, and it is better to maintain moderation. Figures like Gongsun Long with his sophistry or Hui Shi with his manifold arguments resemble mosquitoes pointlessly buzzing about—this is precisely what "lacking in goodness" (不善) looks like.

Those who grasp the subtleties of the Dao (the Way) do not pursue extensive knowledge. Huizong's commentary explains that those who understand the Dao's (the Way's) profundity ultimately return to fundamental truths. Zhuangzi also remarked that the key to the Dao (the Way) lies in simplicity—once the core essence is grasped, broad learning becomes unnecessary. Those who chase extensive knowledge may instead lose themselves in overwhelming information, unable to grasp true wisdom. As the Zhuangzi states, superficial understanding remains shallow, while deep realization constitutes genuine knowledge.

 博之不必知辯之不必慧  䟽義曰爲學日益則聞所不聞見所不見  有以多爲貴者至於爲道日損則無形之  上獨以神視無聲之表獨以氣聽而視聽  有不待耳目之用何取於聞見之多哉善  進道者有曰守約有曰說約信所謂不如  其約也老氏應孔子至道之問且曰博之  不必知辯之不必慧則知道之至妙殆非  多聞見可得而知也明矣 聖人無積  徽宗註曰有積也故不足無藏也故有餘  莊子曰聖道運而無所積孔子曰丘是以  日徂  䟽義曰道之至虚未始有物物量無窮皆  域於道道冥於無則虚而能應物滯於有  則其與幾何若簞之所盛取之如殫籄之  所與有時而匱是有積者故不足也至於  虚而無積則異於此若鑒對形妍醜畢見  若谷應聲美惡皆赴所謂無藏故有餘也  聖人體道之至虚運而無所積六通四闢  無乎不在時出而應之特其緒餘爾未始  礙於實也所以能兆於變化而獨成其天  歟莊子論天道帝道與夫聖道皆曰運而  無積者此也孔子得是道至於奔逸絶塵  反一無迹非一受其成形不化以待盡也  故曰丘以是日徂雖然彼已盡矣又豈溺  於虚寂使學者終不得其門而入耶特不  膠於有迹與之兩忘於無有而已雖忘乎  故吾吾有不忘者存 既以爲人己愈有既以與人己愈多
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the core Daoist principle of "cultivating the Dao through daily diminishment." It points out that while scholars pursue knowledge by seeking more to see and hear, genuine Dao practice moves in the opposite direction—reducing dependence on external senses. The highest form of perception doesn't rely on ears and eyes but observes through the inner Shen (spirit) and listens via Qi (vital energy). When Laozi answered Confucius' question about the ultimate Dao, he remarked: extensive learning doesn't guarantee true understanding, nor does eloquence ensure wisdom—revealing that the profound mystery of the Great Dao cannot be grasped through mere accumulation of sensory experiences.

Regarding the concept of "the sage accumulates nothing": ordinary people cling to hoarding yet perpetually feel insufficient, like bamboo baskets that always exhaust their contents. The sage maintains a state of emptiness, responding naturally like a mirror reflecting objects or an echo resonating in a valley, thereby possessing inexhaustible abundance. Zhuangzi stated that the sage's Dao never lingers in its movement, while Confucius described himself as "diminishing daily" (referring to non-attachment to forms). Crucially, this emptiness isn't passive nihilism but a transcendent state of existence beyond physical traces.

The text concludes by emphasizing the wisdom of giving: the more one helps others, the richer one becomes; the more one gives, the more one possesses. This embodies the Daoist dialectical principle that "reversal is the movement of Dao," demonstrating how true possession arises from the state of non-attachment.

 徽宗註曰善貸且成而未嘗費我萬物皆  往資焉而不匱  䟽義曰道以至無供萬物之求注之不滿  酌之不竭贍足一切而未嘗費凡物盈於  天地之間所以致其生成者皆往資焉而  不匱亦以運而無積而已聖人得乎道未  嘗擅而有之既以爲人己愈有既以與人  己愈多應酬酢之用於虚靜之本至該至  徧隨取隨足所以供其求者豈不綽綽然  有餘裕哉 天之道利而不害  徽宗註曰乾始能以美利利天下不言所  利而物實利之未始有害  䟽義曰乾天道也大哉乾元萬物資始化  機密移於太虚之中闢而生之施而運之  物由是而成凡萬寳畢昌於亨嘉之會者  無非以美利利天下也詩歌豐年有曰多  黍多稌蓋利高燥而寒者黍利下濕而暑  者稌必以多言之以見天之美利無所不  及也雖不言所利而利在其中矣莊子曰  天地有大美而不言其美利如此又何害  之有 聖人之道爲而不爭  徽宗註曰順而不逆其動若水應而不藏  其靜若鑒和而不唱其應若響雖爲也而  爲出于無爲體天而已何爭之有兹德也  而同平道故德經終焉  䟽義曰聖人以道莅天下因物之性輔其  自然故順而不逆其動若水所謂動善時  也供物之求自無適有應而不藏其靜若  鑑所謂守靜篤也赴物之感柔靜自若故
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of Song, in his commentary on the Daode Jing, observes that the Great Dao (the cosmic origin) excels at giving to all things and perfecting them, yet never depletes itself. Though all beings draw resources from the Dao, its provisions remain inexhaustible.

He elaborates: The Dao fulfills the needs of all things through its state of "ultimate emptiness and non-being," much like pouring water into a vessel that never overflows, or drawing from it without exhaustion. It nourishes everything yet never diminishes. All beings between heaven and earth thrive because they continuously receive from the Dao without scarcity—precisely because the Dao never hoards or withholds in its operation. The sage, comprehending this truth, never monopolizes resources. The more they assist others, the more abundant they become; the more they give, the more they possess. This capacity to respond to all things arises from their tranquil and empty (serene and non-acting) essence—both all-encompassing and universal, ever-sufficient whenever drawn upon.

On the annotation of "The Way of Heaven benefits without harming": The Way of Heaven (natural law) resembles the Qian Yuan (the primal yang energy that initiates all things), bestowing the finest benefits upon all beings without proclamation. As Zhuangzi states, "Heaven and Earth possess great beauty yet speak no words"—how could such a benevolent nature, which benefits all, ever bring harm? Like the Book of Songs depicting a bountiful year, where millet thrives on high, dry land and rice flourishes in low, damp fields, the kindness and benefits of Heaven’s Way extend universally to all things.

On the annotation of "The Way of the Sage acts without contention": In governing the world, the sage assists the natural development of all things by following their inherent nature. Their actions flow like water, yielding to circumstance; their responses mirror reflections, perfectly true; their replies echo harmoniously, effortlessly aligned. Though they engage in action, this action stems from wuwei (non-forcing), wholly emulating the Way of Heaven—how could there be contention? Such virtue is in complete harmony with the Dao, which is why the Classic of Virtue (De Jing) concludes with this principle.

Further clarification: When the sage governs the world in accordance with the Dao, they support the natural course of things according to their characteristics. Their movements, like water, seize the opportune moment; in meeting needs, they generate from nothingness, while their inner stillness remains mirror-clear. They respond to all things with gentle spontaneity—acting without coercion, entirely aligned with the rhythms of Heaven’s Way.

 和而不唱其應若響所謂守其雌也是三  者在己無居形物自著非無爲也非有爲  也無爲而無不爲雖建立萬法而爲出於  無爲去智與故循天之理而已天之道一  氣自運品物咸亨無爲而常清不爭而善  勝聖人體天以御世與造物者遊其道密  庸動而緯萬方靜而鑒天地泛應酬酢而  無所於忤故爲而不爭兹德也而同於道  故德經終焉老子於德經之終必以同於  道爲言者蓋莫不由之之謂道道之在我  之謂德德總乎道之所一惟德進於道然  後可以言德之至語道德至此則作經之  㫖不其深乎竊嘗論之夫無言而道隱不  若有言而道明老氏憫當時文勝之弊不  見天地之純全古人之大體將以復其性  情而還之太古著書九九篇發明道德之  意以啓迪天下後世非得已而言也故於  終篇序其作經之意以謂信言不美辯者  不善蓋欲使學者因言以探賾得其所言  以造於忘言之妙也亦若莊周之書終於  天下篇深原大道之本力排百家之蔽自  以謬悠荒唐祛其著書之迹嘗歷考諸子  智足以知聃者無過於周也其書相爲表  裏豈特言辯之間哉迹其論六經之所導  不過詩之志書之事禮之行樂之和與夫  易之陰陽春秋之名分而已豈在於章句  之末是知者不博也及其論衆技之所長  自墨翟而下至於惠施之多方其書五車
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the core Daoist concept of "Wuwei (non-action) yet nothing is left undone," along with the fundamental purpose behind the composition of the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue).

Laozi asserts that the true Dao maintains a state of softness and humble receptivity ("guarding the feminine"). It neither forces deliberate action nor remains completely inactive. Like the natural movement of celestial Dao, all things grow spontaneously without need for artificial interference, maintaining clarity without contention yet prevailing effortlessly. The sage governs the world by emulating this heavenly principle, wandering with the Creator, harmonizing with all beings in both movement and stillness—thus achieving the state of "acting without contention."

The text clarifies that "De (Virtue/Power)" is the manifestation of Dao within the individual. Only by elevating De to merge completely with Dao can one attain its highest realization. Laozi composed the Daode Jing in eighty-one chapters because he observed the societal obsession with superficial refinement and sought to guide people back to their original simplicity. He reluctantly employed words to clarify the true meaning of the Great Dao.

Finally, the scripture emphasizes that genuine wisdom does not lie in mastering literary embellishments (such as the surface content of the Six Classics—poetry, rituals, etc.), but in comprehending the fundamental principles. Just as Zhuangzi's Tianxia ("Under Heaven") chapter critiques the doctrines of various schools, Laozi likewise advocates transcending the superficiality of words to reach the wondrous state of "forgetting speech" through scriptural guidance. Zhuangzi's thought aligns most closely with Laozi's, their works complementing each other as they jointly expound the profound truth of the Dao.

 舛而不合駁而不純去道愈遠是博者不  知也以己獨取虚言之則聖人無積可知  也以徐而不費言之則爲人愈有與人愈  多可知也觀聖人育萬物和天下必以天  爲宗以見天之道利而不害也觀建之以  常無有必言以濡弱謙下爲表以見聖人  之道爲而不爭也謂老莊之書其言不一  其道不約而契考其終篇之意是爲得之  謹論
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the core philosophy of the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue). The author observes that those who pursue extensive knowledge without achieving true synthesis actually drift further from the Dao (the Way). Genuine sages—those who have attained the Dao—do not deliberately accumulate knowledge but maintain a mindset of emptiness and stillness.

Two essential characteristics of the sage are highlighted: first, like the Dao of Heaven, they nourish all things without seeking reward ("benefiting without harming"); second, they consistently preserve an attitude of softness, humility, and deference ("gentle, weak, and humble"). Though the writings of Laozi and Zhuangzi differ in expression, they ultimately point to the same truth—the way of being in the world that is "acting without contention" (engaging in action without striving against others).

The author concludes by emphasizing that careful study of the entire Daode Jing leads to an understanding of this central principle. The phrase "establishing it through constant non-being and being" mentioned here is a key concept in the text, referring to the fundamental principle of taking the eternal "non-being" (wu) and "being" (you) as the root.

道德眞經䟽義卷之十四

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0079); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 13