中文 · EN

《道德真經疏義(一)》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 3 / 14 11,470 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經疏義(一)》 Vol. 3 (Dongshen 洞神部, 14 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 22 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經疏義(一)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經䟽義卷之三莫三     太學生江澂䟽    載營魄章第十 載營魄  徽宗註曰魄陰也麗於體而有所止故老  氏於魄言營魂陽也託於氣而無不之故  易於魂言遊聖人以神御形以魂制魄故  神常載魄而不載於魄如車之運百物載  焉如時之行寒暑往焉心有天遊六徹相  因外天地遺萬物而神未嘗有所困也豈  復滯於魄哉  䟽義曰魄色所生也其字從白白陰色也  入而不變無所之焉則麗於體而有所止  矣故老氏於魄言營營言有所止也魂氣  所主也其字從云云陽氣也出入合散精  神應之則託於氣而無不之矣故易於魂  言遊遊言無不之也聖人以神御形不使  神爲形所累以魂制魄不使魂爲魄所拘  故神常載魄而不載於魄如車之運百物  載焉積中不敗如時之行寒暑往焉人物  乗之心有天遊超然岀乎塵垢之外而周  盡一體異乎狹其所居者六徹相因自目  徹至於智徹而充塞無外異乎六鑿相攘  者知天地與我並生而能外天地知萬物  與我爲一而能遺萬物出入六合經緯萬  方而神未嘗有所困也豈拘於形體而滯  於𩲸哉 抱一能無離乎  徽宗註曰天一生水於物爲精地二生火  於物爲神精神生於道形本生於精守而  勿失與神爲一則精與神合而不離以精  集神以神使形以形存神精全而不虧神
Interpretation

This chapter primarily discusses the relationship between the hun (ethereal soul) and po (corporeal soul) in relation to form and spirit. Within the hun-po duality, the po belongs to yin (the yin aspect), attaching to physical form with inherent limitations. Thus Laozi uses the term "encampment" to describe the po, indicating its fixed nature. The hun belongs to yang (the yang aspect), moving freely with qi and reaching everywhere, hence the Yijing (Book of Changes) employs "wandering" to characterize the hun, denoting its fluidity.

The sage who attains the Dao understands how to use shen (spirit) to govern physical form and employ hun to regulate po. In this way, the shen can carry the po without being constrained by it—just as a cart naturally bears its load or as the seasons alternate between cold and heat. When the mind can wander freely in celestial freedom (tianyou), penetrating all six channels of perception (eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and mind), it transcends the limitations of heaven, earth, and the myriad things. The shen will never be trapped, much less obstructed by the po.

The essential nature of hun and po: The po arises from physical form—its character component "white" (白) symbolizes yin—and becomes fixed upon entering the body. The hun is governed by qi—its character component "cloud" (云) represents yang—and can freely enter, exit, and gather. Sages use shen to command physical form, preventing the spirit from being burdened by the body; they employ hun to control po, ensuring the ethereal soul isn't constrained by the corporeal soul. Thus, the shen naturally carries the po like a cart transporting goods or the seasons progressing through their cycles.

The explanation of "embracing unity without separation": Heaven's number one generates water, corresponding to jing (essence); earth's number two generates fire, corresponding to shen. Both shen and jing originate from the Dao, while physical form arises from jing. By preserving jing and qi without dissipation, unifying shen and jing into oneness, essence and spirit will never separate. Use jing to consolidate shen, employ shen to direct the body, and utilize the body to preserve shen—when essence and qi remain undiminished, the spirit can endure eternally.

(Note: "Six penetrations" refers to the six sensory channels of perception; "celestial wandering" denotes the mind's state of ultimate freedom; "embracing unity" describes maintaining the integrated state of form and spirit.)

 用而不竭形生而不敝如日月之麗乎天  如草木之麗乎土未常離也竊嘗申之人  之生也因精集神體像斯具四達並流無  所不極上際於天下蟠於地化育萬物不  可爲象其名爲同帝而世之愚者役己於  物失性於俗無一息之頃内存乎神馳無  窮之欲外喪其精魂反從魄形反累神而  下與萬物俱化豈不惑焉聖人則不然載  𩲸以通抱一以守體神以靜形將自正其  神經乎太山而不變處乎淵泉而不濡孰  知其所始孰知其所終故曰聖人貴精  䟽義曰道生一一曰水故天一生水於物  爲精一生二二曰火故地二生火於物爲  神物均有氣而精神爲氣之始物均有數  而精神得數之先則精神生於道矣以昭  昭生於冥冥故也天地含精萬物化生四  時散精而爲萬物則形本生於精矣以有  倫生於無形故也善抱不脱守而勿失則  執神而固與神爲一故精與神合而不離  蓋以天下之至精爲能合天下之至神故  也以精集神而不摇其精故精全而不虧  以神使形而抱神以靜故神用而不竭以  形存神而神將守形故形生而不敝精全  而神全神全而形全如日月麗乎天而能  久照如草木麗乎土而能有立未嘗離也  且人之有生精爲身之本精具而神從之  則因精集神體像斯具也精出乎至陰神  出乎至陽陰精爲水陽神爲火水火本無
Interpretation

This scripture expounds the core Daoist teaching on the relationship between Jing (essence), Shen (spirit), and physical form.

Just as the sun and moon adhere to the heavens and plants take root in the earth—never to be separated—so too is human life sustained. Human existence arises when vital Jingqi coalesces to form conscious Shen, thereby constituting a complete physical form. This life-force ascends to the celestial realms and descends through the earth, nurturing all things while remaining formless and invisible. It may be called "equal to the Sovereign" (sharing the creative power of the universe).

Yet ordinary people often become enslaved by external matters, losing their innate nature in mundane affairs. Not for a moment do they settle their heart-mind, instead chasing endless desires. Outwardly they dissipate their vital Jing and ethereal Hunpo (soul), while inwardly burdening their Shen. Ultimately they cycle through birth and death like ordinary creatures—is this not delusion?

The approach of Dao-realized sages is completely different. Through "carrying the Hunpo" (sustaining the soul), they connect inner and outer realms, maintaining the Dao of "embracing Oneness" (holding to pure unity), and nurturing their physical form through serene Shen. Such sages possess Shen as immovable as Mount Tai—even submerged in deep waters, they remain undrenched. Who can discern their beginning or end? Thus we say sages most value preserving Jing.

The commentary further explains: The Dao generates "One"—this One is water (celestial water born of heaven), manifesting as Jing in all things. One generates "Two"—this Two is fire (earthly fire), manifesting as Shen in all things. All beings possess Qi, yet Jing and Shen are its source; all follow numerical principles, yet Jing and Shen precede these patterns. This shows Jing and Shen originate from the Great Dao, just as light emerges from darkness.

Heaven and earth contain Jingqi that transforms all creatures; the seasons distribute Jingqi that nourishes living beings. Thus we see physical form originates from Jingqi, and order arises from the formless. Those skilled in preservation never allow their Jing to scatter—by steadfastly maintaining Shen, they unite with the divine. Thus Jing and Shen achieve eternal union. Only with utmost refined Qi can one attune to supreme Shen-nature; preserving unshaken Jing ensures its completeness. Using Shen to govern form and maintaining stillness makes Shen inexhaustible; when form nurtures spirit, both endure eternally. Like the sun and moon adhering to heaven to shine perpetually, or plants rooted in earth to grow vigorously—Jing, Shen, and form remain inseparable.

Human life takes Jing as its foundation. When Jing is complete, Shen naturally arises—this is the process of "gathering Shen through Jing" to form an integrated body-mind. Jing originates from ultimate Yin-water, Shen from ultimate Yang-fire. Though water and fire normally oppose, they harmoniously coexist within the human body.

 象也以鑑燧求焉而水火自至則精神四  達並流無所不極可知至陰肅肅至陽赫  赫兩者交通成和而物生則我身之與天  地其本一也然則上際下蟠化育萬物名  爲同帝理亦宜然奈何倒置之民大愚而  終身不靈重外輕内忘本逐末役己於物  失性於俗中心營營不得須臾寧無一息  之頃内存乎神□然疲役不知其所歸馳  無窮之欲外喪其精不能以精攝䰟䰟反  從𩲸不能以神御形形反累神不能自别  於物下與萬物俱化豈不惑哉聖人不然  載魄以通作則契理抱一以守靜則合道  無視無聽惟神是守而抱神以靜不虧其  神愼守汝身而形將自正其神經乎太山  而不變其大無外處乎淵泉而不濡其小  無内迎之不見其首孰原其所始隨之不  見其後孰要其所終皆一之精通而然也  故莊子曰聖人貴精舜之戒禹其曰惟精  惟一其知此歟 專氣致柔能如嬰兒乎  徽宗註曰易曰乾其靜也專揚雄曰和柔  足以安物靜而不雜之謂專和而不暴之  謂柔嬰兒居不知所爲行不知所之不藏  是非美惡故氣專而致柔孟子曰蹶者趨  者是氣也而反動其心心不足以專氣則  氣有蹶趨之不正而心至于僨驕而不可  係聖人虚己以遊世心無使氣之强則其  靜而不雜和而不暴與嬰兒也奚擇故曰
Interpretation

This passage employs metaphors and contrasts to elucidate the core principles of Daoist cultivation. Just as bronze mirrors and yangsui (ancient fire-starting tools) naturally attract water and fire, when human spirit (shen) connects with all directions, one comprehends how yin-yang interaction gives birth to all things. In truth, the human body shares the same origin with heaven and earth, yet ordinary people mistake the branch for the root—enslaved by external matters, agitated internally, they lose their innate nature.

The text identifies three types of spiritual confusion: first, indulging desires that deplete essence (jing) and qi, causing the ethereal (hun) and corporeal (po) souls to scatter; second, failing to use consciousness to govern the physical form, instead being burdened by it; third, drowning in external objects until one loses individuality by merging with all things. These are precisely the pitfalls practitioners must avoid.

The cultivation of sages (those who have attained the Dao) follows an entirely different path: they consolidate their hun-po souls to commune with the great Dao, maintaining purity and mental tranquility. Without forced seeing or hearing, they simply focus on guarding their internal spirit. Such practice naturally rectifies physical form, making the spirit so powerful it remains unmoved even if Mount Tai collapses, yet so subtle it can penetrate springs without getting wet. This state knows neither beginning nor end, existing in seamless unity.

The passage concludes by invoking Zhuangzi's adage "the sage treasures essential qi" and Emperor Shun's admonition to Yu: "only through refinement and singleness." Both emphasize the importance of focused purity. Like infants who naturally embody concentrated qi in softness—their actions spontaneous and uncontrived, their minds free of judgment—they maintain focused, gentle breath. When ordinary people experience emotional turbulence, their qi becomes disordered. Sages maintain empty receptivity and peaceful concentration, effortlessly returning to infant-like purity.

 能如嬰兒乎孟子曰其爲氣也至大至剛  以直養而無害則塞乎天地之間老氏之  專氣則曰致柔何也至剛以行義致柔以  復性古之道術無乎不在  䟽義曰易於繫辭言夫乾其靜也專乾之  所以專以靜故也則專者靜而不雜之謂  楊雄於太玄言和柔足以安物柔之所以  安物以和故也則柔者和而不暴之謂且  人生大化有四其在嬰孩欲慮未充其居  也非有意於止也故居不知所爲其行也  非有意於動也故行不知所之直情任理  無機械之心而不藏是非美惡焉故其氣  靜而不雜可以致和而不暴蓋志爲氣之  帥志壹亦足以動氣孟子曰蹶者趨者是  氣也而反動其心是知專氣本於心之一  而不變而已一而不變則萬物無足以撓  心而氣自專矣苟心不足以專氣則氣有  蹶趨之不正心至于僨驕不可係是猶强  梁者不得蔭死尚能如嬰兒乎聖人虚己  以遊世凡横逆之來視之如虚舟飄瓦故  能守柔而心無使氣之强則與嬰兒奚擇  孟子曰其爲氣也至大至剛以直養而無  害則塞于天地之間老氏之專氣則曰致  柔何也蓋至大所以配道至剛所以配義  孟子言至剛主行義言之論氣之用也老  氏言致柔主復性言之論氣之本也若關  尹取其純氣壺子取其衡氣言各有當亦  若是而已古之道術無乎不在者以此
Interpretation

Mencius spoke of human Qi (vital energy) as something that can become supremely vast and strong, capable of filling heaven and earth when nourished with uprightness and left unharmed. Yet Laozi advocates "concentrating Qi to attain softness" - why is this? Strength serves to uphold righteous action, while softness restores one's fundamental nature. The ancient Daoist arts inherently embraced both aspects with equal profundity.

The "Great Commentary" of the I Ching states: "The Qian hexagram in stillness maintains perfect unity." This unity arises precisely from maintaining quiescence. By "concentration" we mean a mind purified of distractions. Yang Xiong's "Canon of Supreme Mystery" declares: "Softness suffices to pacify all things," achieved through harmonious alignment. True "softness" implies gentle compliance rather than forceful imposition.

Human life progresses through four great phases. In infancy, before desires and calculations form, infants rest without conscious stillness - unaware they are doing so; they move without deliberate intention - unconcerned about destinations. Following innate nature spontaneously, they harbor no cunning designs nor distinctions between right/wrong, beautiful/ugly. Thus an infant's Qi remains purely concentrated, achieving harmonious non-resistance.

Will commands Qi as its marshal. Singular focus of will suffices to mobilize Qi's mechanisms. Mencius observed that stumbling and rushing are Qi's operations that conversely affect the spirit. This reveals that Qi concentration fundamentally requires unwavering mental focus. When mind remains undistracted, external phenomena cannot disturb the spirit, and Qi naturally concentrates. Should mental focus prove insufficient, Qi becomes disordered like stumbling and rushing, while the mind grows increasingly willful and ungovernable - akin to how violent men meet untimely ends.

Sages dwell in the world with emptiness like valleys, viewing adversities as drifting empty boats or falling roof tiles. Thus they maintain softness without forceful exertion of Qi or willfulness - how does this differ from an infant's state?

Mencius' "supremely vast and strong" Qi matches heaven's Dao through vastness and righteousness through strength - describing Qi's functional aspect. Laozi's "attaining softness" addresses Qi's essential nature in restoring fundamental being. Guan Yinzi's discourse on undifferentiated Qi and Liezi's balanced Qi simply emphasize different dimensions. Herein lies the omnipresent wisdom of ancient Daoist practice.

滌除玄覽能無疵乎  徽宗註曰聖人以此洗心則滌除萬行而  不有以此退藏於密則玄覽妙理而默識  若是者體純素而不累過而弗悔當而不  自得也何疵之有  䟽義曰古之人以未始有物爲未至必極  於未始有夫未始有物然後爲至以滌除  萬行而不有也以此洗心孰有一毫之攖  以有言有迹非眞必至於忘言息迹然後  爲眞以玄覽妙理而默識也以此退藏於  密孰有言爲之累若是者體純素而不累  無所與雜而不虧其神乗時而爲雖過也  於時不得不過故過而不悔循理而動其  當也於理不得不當故當而不自得何疵  之有 愛民治國能無爲乎  徽宗註曰以仁愛民以智治國施教化修  法則以善一世其於無爲也難矣聖人利  澤施乎萬世不爲愛人功蓋天下似不自  己故無爲也用天下而有餘  䟽義曰愛人利物之謂仁以仁愛民則有  愛利之心矣是是非非之謂智以智治國  則有是非之心矣施教化固未能棄事修  法則固未能息迹以此善一世皆未免乎  有爲其於無爲難矣聖人不然雖有爲而  不離於無爲而爲出於無爲故利澤施乎  萬世不爲愛人初無心於愛民功蓋天下  而似不自己初無心於治國故無爲也用  天下而有餘 天門開闔能爲雌乎  徽宗註曰經曰知其雄守其雌爲天下谿
Interpretation

This passage explains how Daoist practitioners can attain a state of inner purity and natural spontaneity in their actions.

"Cleansing the profound mirror of the mind to be without blemish" describes how sages purify their consciousness to eliminate distracting thoughts, deeply contemplating the mysterious principles without leaving traces. Like the ancient pursuit of the state of "not yet having things" (the primordial emptiness), one must reach a level where even the concept of "not yet having things" no longer exists to achieve true purity. In this way, one maintains their original nature unburdened by attachments, neither becoming arrogant when succeeding nor regretful when failing, naturally remaining flawless.

"Loving the people and governing the state through non-action (Wuwei)" discusses the Dao of governance. While treating citizens with benevolence and ruling with wisdom may bring temporary improvement, these remain forms of "deliberate action." The true sage benefits all generations without consciously seeking fame for loving the people; their achievements cover the world yet seem unrelated to themselves. This is the realm of Wuwei, where governing the world appears effortless.

"The opening and closing of the celestial gate (sensory portals) can be like the feminine" draws from the Daodejing principle of "knowing the masculine while maintaining the feminine." When the gates of perception fluctuate, one should maintain feminine receptivity like still water. Just as mountain streams gather water by staying low, the sage understands strength but abides in gentleness. Thus when responding to the transformations of all things, one reflects reality as naturally as a mirror without retaining traces, achieving the state of "non-action yet nothing left undone."

 聖人體天道之變化卷舒啓閉不違乎時  柔剛微彰惟其所用然未嘗先人而常隨  人未嘗勝物而常下物故天下樂推而不  猒能爲雌於是乎在  䟽義曰經曰知其雄守其雌爲天下谿蓋  雄以剛勝物雌守柔而已知雄而守雌則  不以剛勝物而能守柔也故爲天下谿蓋  谿下地流散所聚故也聖人兆於變化動  而以天行則體天道之變化矣一卷一舒  一啓一閉與時遷徙則卷舒啓閉不違其  時矣知柔知剛知微知彰一寓諸庸則柔  剛微彰惟其所用矣知持後而處先未嘗  先物而嘗隨物知守柔而能强未嘗勝物  而嘗下物故好之無斁天下樂推而不猒  能爲雌於是乎在 明白四達能無知乎  徽宗註曰聰明聖智守之以愚與此同義  䟽義曰眞知無知而不知乃知故能無知  也而無不知也荀子曰聰明聖智守之以  愚聰所以作謀明所以作哲聖則事無不  通智則物無不知聰明聖智可謂明白四  達矣然而至人洞徹無窮而嘗若昏焉昭  曠無外而嘗用晦焉可謂守之以愚也非  能無知而何昔郄雍視盜文子知不得其  死顔子如愚仲尼稱亦足以發然則明白  四達而能無知其得持滿之道乎 生之畜之生而不有爲而不恃長而不宰是 謂玄德  徽宗註曰聖人存神知化與道同體則配  神明育萬物無不可者生之以遂其性畜
Interpretation

The sage emulates the operating principles of the celestial Dao (the Way), following the natural rhythms of expansion and contraction, opening and closing, never violating seasonal patterns. They understand the interplay of firmness and yielding, knowing when to conceal and when to reveal, adapting flexibly to circumstances yet never rushing ahead of others—always flowing with the multitude. Never placing themselves above the myriad things, they remain humble and lowly. Thus, all under heaven delight in honoring them without weariness, precisely because they maintain the yielding gentleness of the feminine.

The Daode Jing states: "Knowing the masculine yet cleaving to the feminine, becoming the valley of the world." The masculine triumphs through hardness, while the feminine preserves gentle compliance. Understanding the principle of masculine strength yet choosing feminine yielding means not suppressing others through force but maintaining a harmonious nature, thus becoming the valley where all things converge. The valley occupies the lowest position yet gathers streams from all directions. The sage anticipates change, acting in accordance with the celestial Dao, thereby embodying its operational patterns. Whether gathering or expanding, opening or closing, all follow the shifts of circumstance—thus their advances and retreats are always timely.

They comprehend both softness and strength, perceive both the subtle and the manifest, integrating all into daily application, so that firmness and yielding, concealment and revelation, are perfectly balanced. Understanding that holding back ultimately leads to advancement, they never rush ahead but always follow; knowing that preserving gentleness leads to true strength, they never dominate but remain humble. For this reason, people never tire of them, and all under heaven delight in upholding them—this is the manifestation of the feminine Dao.

True wisdom appears dull and unknowing precisely because it does not deliberately seek knowledge yet thereby knows all things. As Xunzi said: "Use simplicity to preserve wisdom and insight." "Acumen" enables skillful planning, "clarity" grants discernment, "sageliness" means penetrating all things, and "wisdom" signifies omniscience—these four qualities may be called "illuminating the four directions." Yet those who attain the Dao, though thoroughly penetrating, seem muddled; though brilliantly evident, appear obscure. This is using simplicity to preserve wisdom. Just as Xi Yong of old could identify thieves yet met an untimely end, while Yan Hui, seeming foolish, was praised by Confucius for elucidating profound meaning. Thus, true understanding lies in maintaining a state of apparent unknowing—is this not the supreme attainment of fullness without overflow?

The Dao gives birth to and nourishes the myriad things, yet does not claim possession; acts yet takes no credit; guides yet does not dominate—this is the most profound De (Virtue/Power). The sage merges with the great Dao, participating in heaven and earth's transformations, thus cooperating with the divine and nurturing all beings.

 之以極其養無愛利之心焉故生而不有  無矜伐之行焉故爲而不恃無刻制之巧  焉故長而不宰若是者其德深矣遠矣與  物反矣故曰是謂玄德天道升于北則與  物辯而玄者天之色也聖人之於天道降  而爲德非玄不足以名之  䟽義曰神妙物而不測惟聖人存之則與  神爲一化因形而移易惟聖人知之則與  化爲人存神知化以與道同體故也惟與  道同體則與天地合其德而爲萬物之所  係雖天地神明足以配之萬物雖多足以  育之無不可者是以其生之也以遂其性  所謂萬物之生各得其宜也其蓄之也以  極其養所謂苟得其養無物不長也雖兆  於動出然自生自化以萬物爲芻狗未嘗  有愛人利物之心焉敦有之哉故生而不  有雖效於變化然民日遷善不知爲之者  未嘗有自矜自伐之行焉孰恃之哉故爲  而不恃雖見於統一然主治自我而大制  不割未嘗有刻制之巧焉孰宰之哉故長  而不宰夫生之者常失於有而有之而能  不有爲之者常失於恃其成也而能不恃  長之者常失於宰制雕琢而能不宰則以  微妙眇冥不可測究出於有物之表深矣  遠矣與物反矣故也非德小而妙敦與於  此故曰是謂玄德易曰天玄而地黄則玄  者天之色也春爲蒼天則玄者天道之復  冬北辨之時也聖人之於天道降而爲德
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the profound connotation of "Xuan De" (mysterious virtue). Laozi posits that truly profound virtue manifests as: nurturing all things without claiming possession (producing without possessing), acting without self-importance (acting without relying), and guiding all beings without domination (leading without controlling). This virtue is profoundly mysterious and runs counter to ordinary understanding.

When the Dao of Heaven (natural law) manifests in the northern direction, it becomes distinct from all things, and "Xuan" (mysterious darkness) is precisely the color of Heaven. The sage embodies this Heavenly Dao as virtue, and only the term "Xuan" can describe such a state. Sages achieve unity with the divine, comprehending the Dao of transformation because they are one with the Great Dao. Such individuals align with the virtue of Heaven and Earth, becoming the reliance of all things—even the celestial deities resonate with them, and all beings find nourishment through them.

The sage's approach to all things is: allowing natural growth (following their nature) and providing abundant nourishment (fulfilling their sustenance). Though all things are in constant motion and change, the sage regards them equally as "straw dogs" (sacrificial offerings symbolizing impartiality), without partiality; though teaching people toward goodness, they claim no merit; though governing all beings, they avoid forced control or artificial shaping. This virtue is subtle and unfathomable, transcending concrete phenomena, hence described as "so profound it reverses ordinary understanding."

The Book of Changes states "Heaven is Xuan, Earth is yellow"—"Xuan" being Heaven's color; spring is called "azure Heaven," while "Xuan" represents the Heavenly Dao manifesting in winter's northern direction. When sages transform the lofty Heavenly Dao into concrete virtue, this virtue is called "Xuan De."

 妙而小焉天道已行矣非玄不足以名之    三十輻章第十一 三十輻共一轂當其無有車之用埏埴以爲 器當其無有器之用鑿户牖以爲室當其無 有室之用  徽宗註曰有無一致利用出入是謂至神  有無異相在有爲體在無爲用陰陽之運  萬物之理也車之用在運器之用在盛室  之用在虚妙用出於至无變化藏於不累  如鑑無象因物顯照至人用心每解乎此  䟽義曰即至神以觀之意其有而非有意  其無而非無冥有與無而利用皆所自出  入則有無一致利用出入是謂至神也即  陰陽萬物以觀之顯而可見斯謂之有幽  而不測斯謂之無別有無於異相在有爲  體在無爲用陰陽之運萬物之理也故三  十輻共一轂埏埴以爲器鑿户牖以爲室  皆顯於有者也車與器室利在是焉然車  之所以運器之所以盛室之所以虚果何  物哉妙用出於至無而莫覩其端倪變化  藏於不累而莫窺其畛域如鑑無像因物  顯照不將不迎應而不藏固非有也亦非  無也應物而不傷斯已矣至人用心每解  乎此 故有之以爲利無之以爲用  徽宗註曰有則實無則虚實故具貌像聲  色而有質虚故能運量酬酢而不窮天地  之間道以器顯故無不廢有器以道妙故  有必歸无木撓而水潤火熯而金堅土均  而布稼穡出焉此有也而人賴以爲利天
Interpretation

The Dao of heaven is profound and subtle, beyond complete description in words. Just as thirty spokes converge at the hub of a wheel, what truly functions is the empty space at its center. When clay is kneaded to form a vessel, what proves useful is the hollow interior. When doors and windows are carved to build a house, what becomes habitable is the empty space within.

Emperor Huizong of Song explains: The tangible form and intangible void are in fact unified—this wondrous unity of opposites constitutes the highest mystery. All things manifest dual states of "being" (you) and "non-being" (wu)—"being" as concrete form, "non-being" as functional space. Like the movement of Yin-Yang and the cycle of creation and dissolution: the wheel's hollow enables movement, the vessel's void allows containment, the house's emptiness permits dwelling. These marvelous functions all originate from the fundamental "non-being," ever-changing yet never burdensome. As a mirror holds no image yet reflects all things, so too is the mind of one who attains the Dao.

At a deeper level: Concrete existence constitutes visible "being," while the unfathomable essence is "non-being." Though "being" and "non-being" appear distinct, "being" provides form while "non-being" enables function—this is the law governing Yin-Yang's operation and all existence. Wheels, vessels, and houses are tangible "being," yet their true efficacy lies in their "non-being." This wondrous function springs from fundamental emptiness, infinitely transforming yet leaving no trace. Like a mirror reflecting without attachment, the sage's mind responds to all things—neither deliberately pursuing "being" nor clinging to "non-being," simply responding naturally without harm.

Thus we say: Concrete objects provide convenience, but their emptiness constitutes the true functional essence. Emperor Huizong further explains: Concrete objects are substantial, while emptiness is insubstantial. Substantial things possess form, sound, color and other concrete attributes, while the insubstantial void enables movement, containment and response. Heaven and earth's principles manifest through concrete objects, hence we cannot deny "being's" existence; yet objects' marvelous functions depend on "non-being's" principle, so "being" ultimately returns to "non-being." As bent wood channels water, hard metal withstands forging, and level earth permits cultivation—these all belong to "being's" aspect, through which humanity gains benefit.

 之所以運地之所以處四時之所以行百  物之所以昌孰尸之者此无也而世莫覩  其迹故其用不匱有無之相生老氏於此  三者推而明之  疏義曰有則有礙無適非實無則無間無  適非虚實故具貌像聲色而有質有之以  爲利故也虚故能運量酬酢而不窮無之  以爲用故也目道而降域於兩間形而上  者不離於有在無亦顯也故道以器顯無  不廢有形而下者不外於無在有亦藏也  故器以道妙有必歸無散爲五行水火爲  用金木爲器土穀爲利木撓而水潤火熯  而金堅土均而布稼穡出焉凡在天地之  間孰不資焉故人賴以爲利降於域中天  其運乎地其處乎四時行焉百物生焉若  有機緘而不得已若運轉而不能自止孰  尸之者皆天也故世莫覩其迹焉雖然無  即妙有有即眞無有無相生若循環然天  地之大秋毫之小未有逃此者即車之運  器之盛室之容以明之凡天下之物所以  運所以盛所以容可以類知矣老氏於斯  三者推而明之舉一以知萬故也    五色章第十二 五色令人目盲五音令人耳聾  徽宗註曰目圍二焉其見者性也徹而爲  明則作哲足以斷天下之疑耳藏一焉其  聞者性也徹而爲聰則作謀足以通天下  之志覩道之人無形之上獨以神視無聲  之表獨以氣聽而視聽有不待耳目之用
Interpretation

Behind the operation of heaven and earth, the cycle of seasons, and the growth of all things, it is actually the "Non-being" (the void nature of the Dao) that functions. Though ordinary people cannot perceive its form, its efficacy is inexhaustible. Through the mutual transformation between "Being" (concrete existence) and "Non-being," Laozi reveals the mystery of these three phenomena.

"Being" (manifest existence) is constrained by form and substance, appearing as concrete shapes and sounds; "Non-being" (the void of Dao) remains unbound, capable of functioning limitlessly. From the perspective of Dao, the metaphysical (abstract essence) cannot be separated from the manifestation of "Being," while the physical (concrete things) also contains the essence of "Non-being." Among the Five Phases (Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, Water), water and fire manifest their functions, metal and wood form vessels, while earth and grain nourish all things—everything between heaven and earth relies on these operations.

The rotation of heaven and earth, the cycle of seasons, and the growth of all things seem to be driven by some mechanism, yet no concrete ruler can be found. In truth, "Non-being" is the mysterious "Being," and "Being" is the actual "Non-being"—the two generate each other in cyclical fashion. Just as a cart moves, a vessel contains, and a house holds space, the principles governing all things under heaven can be understood through such analogies. Through these three examples, Laozi uses the small to illuminate the great Dao.

The "Chapter on Five Colors" points out: indulging in colorful sights dulls vision, while drowning in music weakens hearing. Those who truly comprehend the Dao do not rely on physical senses but observe the formless realm with their spirit (Shen) and listen to soundless vibrations with their vital energy (Qi). When the mind reaches a state of clarity, one can discern right from wrong and comprehend the ultimate principles of the world. (Note: "Huizong" refers to Emperor Huizong of Song, Zhao Ji, whose commentary on the Daode Jing is cited here.)

 者曾何聲色之足蔽哉世之人役耳目於  外物之累故目淫於五色耳淫於五音而  聰明爲之衰其於盲聾也何辯  䟽義曰離再索得女外奇内耦其象爲目  則目圍二也取諸八物爲火火則其光外  景故在性爲見目徹爲明明以作哲故足  以斷天下之疑五色敦得以亂其明坎再  索得男外耦内奇其象爲耳則耳藏一也  取諸八物爲水水則其明内燭故在性爲  聞耳徹爲聰聰以作謀故足以通天下之  志五音敦得以汨其聰覩道之人解乎此  造見見之妙無形之上獨以神視故能見  不見之形造聞聞之妙無聲之表獨以氣  聽故能聞無聲之聲無所不見無所不聞  視聽不用耳目而所見所聞無適非眞曾  何聲色之足蔽哉世之人所見不能勝所  覩不知聞和於無聲役耳目於外物之累  悦明而淫於色孰知天下之正色悦聰而  淫於聲敦知天下之大音作聰明而聰明  曰衰則不聰實無耳也不明實無目也其  於聾盲奚擇雖然人者自盲聾爾豈聲音  之能聾盲人哉 五味令人口爽馳騁田獵令人心發狂  徽宗註曰道之出口淡乎其無味五味人  之所同嗜也而厚味實腊毒故令人口爽  人之生也形不盈仞而心侔造化聖人之  心動而緯萬方靜而鑑天地世之人從事  於田獵而因以喪其良心不足以自勝可  不謂大哀也耶
Interpretation

People are often deluded by external things—their eyes become addicted to colorful sights, their ears drown in alluring sounds, gradually diminishing their originally clear faculties of sight and hearing. How is this any different from being blind or deaf?

The Shuyi commentary explains: The Li trigram (the fire trigram among the Eight Trigrams) symbolizes the eyes. The eyes consist of two parts, just as fire emits light to illuminate the external world. Our innate nature endows us with the power of vision—clear sight allows us to discern things and resolve worldly complexities, so that no amount of dazzling colors can disturb this clarity. The Kan trigram (the water trigram among the Eight Trigrams) symbolizes the ears. The ears contain a single aperture, just as water reflects what lies within. Our innate nature grants us the capacity for hearing—acute listening enables us to comprehend things and penetrate the principles of the world, so that no clamor of sounds can disrupt this wisdom.

Those who awaken to the Dao understand this truth. They attain the state of "seeing what cannot be seen"—observing formless things with their spirit (Shen), and reach the realm of "hearing what cannot be heard"—listening to the soundless world through their vital energy (Qi). Without using their physical eyes, they perceive all things; without relying on their ears, they hear all sounds. What they see and hear is the true essence of reality. Ordinary people, however, remain confined to sensory perception, obsessed with external sights and sounds: they chase visual pleasures and indulge in beauty, yet fail to recognize what true beauty is; they pursue auditory delights and become infatuated with melodies, yet remain deaf to the grandest harmonies of heaven and earth. They pride themselves on sharp hearing and keen sight, but in truth, their faculties are deteriorating—how is this any different from deafness or blindness? Yet human deafness and blindness are self-inflicted—how can they be blamed on sounds and colors?

Excessive pursuit of rich flavors dulls the palate, while obsession with hunting and revelry drives the spirit (Shen) to madness. As Emperor Huizong of Song noted in his commentary: The Great Dao, when spoken, is bland and flavorless, yet worldly people crave intense tastes, unaware that such richness acts like poison to the senses. Though the human body is small, the mind can perceive the vastness of heaven and earth. With a single thought, the sage can weave the patterns of all things; in stillness, they reflect the cosmos. But ordinary people lose themselves in hunting and amusement, abandoning their original mind (benxin) and losing self-control—is this not the greatest tragedy?

 䟽義曰人食芻豢麋鹿食薦螂蛆食蛇鴟  鴉嗜鼠四者孰知天下之正味所謂正味  即道之出口淡乎其無味是也人皆知味  之所味者有同嗜而不知有味味者存故  以芻豢稻粱爲足美然而厚味寔腊毒雖  可以養口體而失其大體矣此五味令人  口爽也蓋爽差也口爽則失其所謂正味  矣且人之生眇乎小哉所以屬於人則形  不盈仞也謷乎大哉獨成其天則心侔造  化也聖人盡心之眞動而緯萬方則周流  無間靜而鑑天地則旁燭無疆方且御六  氣之辨以遊無窮尚何從事於田獵之間  爲哉昧者不知自勝爲强徒以習馳逐爲  務或蹶趨以動其心而不能自得良心亦  從而喪矣可不謂大哀耶 難得之貨令人行妨  徽宗註曰利以養人而貨以化之故交利  而俱贍聖人不貴難得之貨不貴異物賤  用物欲人之安其分而無所奪也貴難得  之貨則至於决性命之情而饕貴富何行  之能守故令人行妨仲虺之稱湯曰不殖  貨利孔子之謂子貢曰賜不受命而貨殖  焉貨之妨行如此  䟽義曰先王懋遷有無化居所以阜通貨  賄使交利而俱贍也蓋利所以養人而化  之則爲貨故交利而俱贍難得之貨衣之  不可衣食之不可食茍以是爲貴則至於  决性命之情而饕富貴攘奪誕謾無所不  至欲民安性命之情惟行之爲守難矣然
Interpretation

This commentary reveals the profound meaning of "true flavor" (the essential taste of Dao) through comparing the dietary preferences of different creatures. Humans relish beef and mutton, deer graze on grass, centipedes consume snakes, and owls delight in mice—who can determine what constitutes the world's genuine delicacy? In truth, the authentic flavor is Dao itself, which is plain and seemingly tasteless. While people crave intense flavors, they fail to recognize that the "flavor beyond flavors" transcending specific tastes is the fundamental essence.

Excessive pursuit of gourmet pleasures harms the body—while gratifying momentary cravings, it damages one's foundational vitality. This explains why "the five flavors make people's mouths go astray"—here "astray" signifies deviation, as overindulgence in tastes leads to losing perception of true flavor. Though the human form is small, the mind can encompass the vast creativity of heaven and earth. The sage maintains an authentic heart-mind (xin), capable of ordering all things when active and reflecting cosmic patterns when still, riding the transformations of the six qi to roam boundlessly. Why would such a one indulge in hunting pursuits?

Those who fail to understand that self-mastery constitutes true strength become obsessed with galloping hunts, their spirit (shen) agitated and unstable, thereby losing their original heart-mind—a truly pitiable state.

Regarding "rare goods make people's conduct falter": Material goods were originally meant to nourish life, but excessive craving for rare treasures causes aberrant behavior. Sages disregard rare objects precisely to encourage people to abide in their fundamental nature. Coveting treasures drives individuals to desperate acts—how could virtue (de) be preserved this way? Tang of Shang avoided hoarding wealth, and Confucius criticized Zigong for commercial pursuits, both demonstrating how possessions obstruct virtue.

Ancient sage-kings facilitated balanced exchange between regions so all benefited. Goods exist to sustain life, yet when rare objects—neither edible nor wearable—are prized as treasures, people resort to reckless plunder, making it impossible to maintain their original simplicity.

 則聖人不貴異物賤用物者無他欲人之  安其分而無所奪也是以捐金於巉嵁之  山投珠於五湖之淵不貴難得之貨使人  我之養畢足而止敦有行妨者哉仲虺之  稱湯曰不殖貨利則以動不爲利正大人  之行也孔子謂子貢曰賜不受命而貨殖  焉則以喻於利非君子之所爲也莊子所  以欲擿玉毁珠而貴夫不利貨財者以此 是以聖人爲腹不爲目故去彼取此  徽宗註曰八卦坤爲腹以厚載而容也離  爲目以外視而明也厚載而容則無所不  受外視而明則有所不及聖人以天下爲  度故取此能容之腹非事事而治之物物  而察之也故去彼外視之目莊子曰賊莫  大於德有心而心有眼故聖人去之  䟽義曰坤厚載物含萬物而化光近取諸  身則爲腹以厚載而容也外陽内陰明兩  作爲離近取諸身則爲目以外視而明故  也厚載而容則未嘗有擇收而積之亡處  亡塊故無所不受外視而明則不能無辨  能見百歩之外而不能自見其睫故有所  不及聖人泯是非一好惡以天下爲度故  取此能容之腹無所决擇無所去取非事  事而治之物物而察之也故去彼外視之  目莊子曰賊莫大於德有心而心有眼蓋  開天者德生開人者賊生心有眼則開人  而賊生也故聖人不爲目    寵辱章第十三 寵辱若驚貴大患若身
Interpretation

This passage explains how sages do not pursue rare treasures but value practical things, aiming to help people remain content with their lot and avoid contention. Thus, the sage would cast gold into deep mountains and throw pearls to the bottom of lakes, placing no value on hard-to-obtain objects and ensuring people's daily needs are simply met. In such circumstances, who would still engage in actions that harm others?

Zhong Hui, a virtuous minister of the Shang dynasty, praised King Tang of Shang for "not hoarding wealth," illustrating how truly great men act not for personal gain. Confucius told his disciple Zigong, "You refuse to accept your fate and instead engage in trade," using this example to show that chasing profit is not the conduct of a noble person. Zhuangzi advocated smashing fine jade and destroying pearls to honor those free from material greed.

Therefore, the sage emphasizes inner cultivation ("for the belly" signifies inner fulfillment) over external extravagance ("for the eyes" signifies sensory indulgence), hence rejecting the latter in favor of the former. Emperor Huizong of Song commented: In the Bagua (Eight Trigrams), the Kun trigram symbolizes the belly, representing magnanimous virtue that bears all things; the Li trigram symbolizes the eyes, representing outward observation. What embraces can contain everything, but the eyes observing external things always have limitations. The sage takes the world as their standard, thus choosing an all-encompassing mind over micromanaging every detail.

Further elaboration clarifies: The Kun trigram's magnanimous virtue is like the belly's capacity to digest food; the Li trigram, yang outside and yin within, resembles the eyes that perceive the external world. One who embraces does not pick and hoard, hence containing all; though the eyes see afar, they cannot see their own lashes, so limitations remain. The sage dissolves judgments and preferences, taking the world as their measure, thus choosing inclusive breadth over meddling in every affair. Zhuangzi said, "No disaster is greater than harboring cunning and viewing things with prejudice," for innate nature is De (Virtue), while artificial scheming brings calamity. Therefore, the sage does not pursue external sensory pleasures.

Chapter 13 ("Favor and Disgrace") states: Both favor and disgrace alarm the heart, and great calamity is regarded as seriously as one's own body. This means ordinary people are easily swayed by external judgments, while sages transcend such influences.

 徽宗註曰寵者在下貴者在上居寵而以  爲榮則辱矣處貴而以爲累則患莫大焉  以富爲是者不能辭禄以顯爲是者不能  辭名親權者不能與人柄操之則慄捨之  則悲兹寵辱所以若驚歟慘怛之疾恬愉  之安時集於體怵迫之恐欣懽之喜交溺  於心兹大患所以若身歟  䟽義曰寵者人之所榮在下之道也貴者  人之所累在上之道也居寵而以爲榮則  席其寵矣席其龐則辱或隨之處貴而以  爲累則矜其貴矣矜其貴則患莫大焉以  富爲是者不能辭禄累於厚利故也以顯  爲是者不能辭名累於高名故也親權者  不能與人柄以權勢不尤則夸者悲故也  於是三者操之則慄所謂旣得之患失之  也捨之則悲所謂寄去則不樂也兹寵辱  所以若驚歟集於體者非有慘怛之疾爲  陰陽之寇則有恬愉之安涉人道之患溺  於心者非有怵迫之恐以毗於陰則有欣  懽之喜以偏于陽一身之患叢起交攻貴  而以爲之累其患亦若此而已此大患所  以若身歟 何謂寵辱寵爲下  徽宗註曰龍之爲物變化自如不可制畜  可宀覆焉則志於豢養有辱之道古之善  爲士者三旌之位不足易其介萬鍾之禄  不足遷其守居寵而思危在福而若沖則  何辱之有貪夫位也慕夫禄也知進而不  知退知得而不知喪則人賤之矣故受寵  於人則爲下之道
Interpretation

In his commentary on the Dao De Jing, Emperor Huizong of the Song Dynasty observed: "Being favored (referring to excessive praise from others) actually places one in an inferior position, while true nobility belongs to those who dwell in higher realms. When one becomes complacent due to receiving favor, it invites disgrace; regarding high status as a burden—this is the greatest misfortune."

Those who make wealth their life's aim cannot relinquish their emoluments; those pursuing fame cannot abandon empty honors; those obsessed with power are least willing to share authority. They tremble with anxiety when gaining and wallow in grief when losing—this explains why both favor and disgrace can equally unsettle the mind.

The human body alternately suffers from ailments (indicating yin-yang imbalance) and indulges in comfort; the heart is at times oppressed by fear, at others overwhelmed by euphoria—these fluctuating afflictions illustrate why "the greatest misfortune clings to us like our own body."

The commentary further elaborates: Though being favored seems glorious, its essence remains a subordinate position; true nobility should transcend, yet when perceived as burden, it breeds arrogance. The avaricious are trapped by profit, the fame-seekers shackled by vanity, the power-hungry lament lost influence. They acquire with trepidation and lose with sorrow—this is the root cause of being "startled by both favor and disgrace."

(Note: "Three-banner rank" refers to high official positions, "ten-thousand-bell emolument" denotes extravagant salaries, while "chong" represents the Daoist ideal of empty stillness. This passage contrasts worldly pursuits with Daoist principles, revealing how excessive attachment to external things invites misfortune.)

 䟽義曰行天莫如龍合則成體散則成章  此變化自如不可制蓄也能見而不能潜  未離乎宀覆可豢之以駕馭服乗則未免  有悔此可宀覆焉則志於豢養有辱之道  也寵之所以爲辱以是故爾是以善爲士  者三旌之位不足易其介知在我者有貴  於三旌之位也萬鍾之禄不足遷其守知  在我者有富於萬鍾之禄也得持寵之術  則居寵而思危知保福之道則在福而若  冲故能富貴不離其身而福禄能長且乆  何辱之有哉苟或貪夫位而誣僞以取貴  慕夫禄而貪汙以取富知進不知退昧消  長之理知得不知喪蔽盈虚之數則趙孟  之貴趙孟能賤之故受寵於人則爲下之  道 得之若驚失之若驚是謂寵辱若驚  徽宗註曰軒冕在身非性命之理也物之  儻來寄也寄之來不可拒故至人不以得  爲悦其去不可圉故至人不以失爲憂今  寄去則不樂受而喜之是以得失累乎其  心能勿驚乎柳下惠爲士師三黜而不去  正考父三命循墻而走則異於此  䟽義曰至貴在我足以并國爵則軒冕在  身非性命之理也外物不可必而求無益  於得以物之儻來寄也惟時無止則寄之  來不可拒其得之也於我何加故至人不  以得爲悦惟分無常則寄之去不可圉其  失之也於我何損故至人不以失爲憂昧  者不知窮通如寒暑之序寄去則不樂或
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist profound insight regarding fame, gain, and the fluctuations of favor and disgrace. Using the dragon's transformations as a metaphor: when soaring freely through the heavens, the dragon can coalesce into form, yet when dispersing, it transforms into clouds—this state of effortless metamorphosis lies beyond human control. Just as a dragon raised in captivity to pull carriages loses its innate nature, bringing disgrace upon itself.

The truly wise (those adept at being scholars) understand that even the honor of holding the highest official positions (the "three banners") cannot compare to preserving one's moral integrity; nor can the wealth of "ten thousand measures" match the richness of maintaining one's fundamental nature. Those who comprehend the method of preserving favor can perceive impending crisis even when enjoying privilege; those who grasp the principle of safeguarding blessings remain humble amidst prosperity. Only such individuals can retain wealth and honor enduringly without suffering disgrace.

Conversely, those who crave power and position, who pursue wealth by any means—knowing only advancement without retreat, ignorant of the principles of waxing and waning—resemble Zhao Meng of the Spring and Autumn period (a powerful Jin state minister). Though temporarily illustrious, they ultimately meet with contempt. Thus, receiving favor from others is inherently a lowly condition.

Emperor Huizong of Song's commentary notes: official positions and titles (carriages and crowns) are not intrinsic to life's essence, being merely external objects obtained by chance. The perfected person neither rejoices in gaining them nor grieves their loss. Like Liuxia Hui (the virtuous Lu state official) who bore no resentment after three dismissals, or Zheng Kaofu (Confucius' ancestor) who grew more humble with each promotion—this constitutes the proper attitude.

The passage ultimately emphasizes: true nobility resides within. External glory and wealth are like passing guests—when they come, don't refuse; when they depart, don't cling. Foolish people fail to understand that poverty and prosperity alternate like the four seasons. Both gain and loss disturb their hearts—this is the meaning behind "favor and disgrace seem alarming."

 隕穫於貧賤受而喜之或充詘於富貴得  失交戰於胸中靈臺且爲之窒其不驚者  幾希柳下惠爲士師三黜而不去正考父  三命循墻而走豈以得失累其心哉 何謂貴大患若身  徽宗註曰據利勢擅賞罰作福威天下畏  之如神明尊之如上帝可謂貴矣聖人則  不以貴自累故能長守貴而無患譬如人  身墮肢體黜聰明離形去智通於大同則  無入而不自得也世之人以物易性故累  物而不能忘勢以形累心故喪心而不能  忘形其患大矣  䟽義曰以貴自居未免有患惟不自有其  貴則可以守貴矣猶人之一身認爲己有  則動輒有礙知身非我有則可以保身矣  今夫利勢之重得以據之賞罰之權得以  檀之威福之柄得以專之天下畏之如神  明尊之如上帝其貴可謂無敵矣惟聖人  執虚馭滿不以貴自居則雖貴而無患如  人之有身寓百骸以墮肢體象耳目以黜  聰明離形而不拘於形去智而不鑿以智  則同於大通造乎不形無入而不自得也  夫孰以身爲患哉妄庸之人不能盡性而  忘勢累於物以易其性不能盡心而忘形  累於形以喪其心以物易性以形累心其  患大矣 吾所以有大患者爲吾有身及吾無身吾有 何患  徽宗註曰人之生也百骸九竅六臟賅而  存焉吾誰能爲親認而有之皆惑也體道
Interpretation

When in poverty and hardship, if one can remain content and joyful; or when wealthy and prominent, if one can avoid arrogance and complacency—both states are truly rare. Ordinary minds are constantly calculating gains and losses, their inner being clogged with such thoughts. Those undisturbed by these concerns are exceedingly few. Liu Xiahui (a virtuous scholar of Lu during the Spring and Autumn period) was dismissed from office three times yet never left his country, while Zheng Kaofu (an ancestor of Confucius) became increasingly humble with each promotion—how could such men be disturbed by thoughts of gain or loss?

Why does it say "regard great troubles as you regard your body"? Emperor Huizong of Song explains: Those who wield power, control rewards and punishments, and act with arbitrary authority are feared by all as if they were deities, revered like the Lord on High—this may be called supreme honor. Yet the sage does not become ensnared by such honor, thus maintaining it long without calamity. Consider the human body: if one can release attachment to limbs, abandon sensory desires, transcend physical constraints, and free oneself from mental calculations to merge with the Dao, then any circumstance becomes a state of effortless ease. Ordinary people trade their innate nature for external things, thus becoming burdened by material concerns; they let physical form enslave their spirit, thus losing their original heart—this is indeed the greatest affliction.

Further elaboration: Clinging to honor inevitably invites disaster; only by not claiming honor as one's own can one truly preserve it. Just as excessive concern for the body restricts every movement, realizing the body isn't truly "ours" allows its true preservation. Today's power-wielders who monopolize rewards and punishments, acting with unchecked authority, may be worshiped as divine by the world, yet this "matchless honor" is precisely what sages reject. The sage maintains emptiness and stillness, steering perfection without claiming honor, thus remaining in high station without calamity. Like one who has a body yet releases limb attachments, possesses senses yet transcends them, escapes form without being bound by it, and abandons cunning without scheming—only thus can one commune with the Dao, reaching the formless realm where all circumstances bring unhindered freedom. How could such a person consider the body an affliction?

Mediocre individuals cannot exhaust their innate nature to forget power, becoming altered by external burdens; they cannot fully employ their spirit to transcend form, becoming enslaved by physical constraints—trading innate nature for externals, burdening spirit with form—this is the greatest affliction.

Laozi said, "The reason I have great troubles is because I have this body." When I reach the state of no-body, what troubles could remain? Emperor Huizong annotates: Human life consists of a hundred bones, nine orifices, and six organs. To stubbornly insist "this is me" is delusion. Those who embody the Dao understand these are merely temporary aggregations.

 者解乎此故孔子曰朝聞道夕死可矣孟  子曰夭壽不二顔子曰回坐忘矣夫死生  亦大矣而無變于己況得喪禍福之所介  乎此古之至人所以不以利累形不以形  累心視萬物與我將擇焉而不可得則吾  身非吾有也上與造物者遊下與外死生  無終始者爲友吾有何患且寵者世所榮  也而以爲辱貴者人所樂也而以爲患蓋  外物之不可恃也理固然矣誠能有之以  無有則雖寵而不辱雖貴而無患伊尹之  不以寵利居成功堯之不以位爲樂幾是  已  䟽義曰形骸之内有眞君足以高天下有  眞宰足以制萬物形骸之外百骸九竅六  臟賅而存焉吾誰與爲親苟不知索於形  體之内方且本身而異形認而有之皆惑  也惟體道者知形形之不形雖其形化而  吾有不忘者存故朝聞道夕死可矣孟子  曰夭壽不二齊壽夭也顔子曰回坐忘矣  忘物我也夫死生亦大矣而無變于己况  得喪禍福之所介乎此無他知形骸之内  有眞君眞宰者存故總括百骸者不能爲  之患也古之至人不以利累形異乎見得  而忘形不以形累心至於廢心而用形内  觀其心心無其心外觀其形形無其形遠  觀其物物無其物視萬物與我將擇焉而  不得則吾身非吾有也見不見之形上與  造物者遊下與外死生無終始者爲友夫
Interpretation

Confucius once said: "Hearing the Dao in the morning, one could die content in the evening." Mencius declared: "Neither short life nor long years would alter my resolve." Yan Hui (Confucius' disciple) attained the state of "sitting in forgetfulness" (zuowang - meditative self-oblivion). Life and death are indeed the great matters of human existence, yet they cannot shake the mind of one who has awakened to the Dao—how much less could trivial matters like gain and loss, fortune and misfortune? The ancient Dao-realized sages would not allow profit to harm their bodies, nor would they permit physical form to constrain their spirit. Observing the relationship between all things and themselves, they realized nothing in creation could truly be possessed—thus understanding that even their own bodies did not truly belong to them. Such persons could wander with the Creator and befriend those who transcended life and death, dwelling beyond beginnings and endings—what worries could remain?

Ordinary people consider favor and flattery as honors, but Dao-realized beings regard them as shameful. Common folk take pride in high status, while awakened minds perceive it as misfortune. For external things fundamentally cannot be relied upon—this is the principle of nature. If one can hold all things with the mindset of "non-being" (wu), then neither favor will feel humiliating nor high position bring distress. Just as Yi Yin (virtuous minister of Shang dynasty) never boasted of imperial favor, and Emperor Yao found no delight in his throne—both understood this truth.

The Commentary explains: Within the human body resides the "True Sovereign" (zhenjun - the authentic self governing spirit) that can look down upon the whole world, and the "True Governor" (zhenzai - the original substance ruling body and mind) capable of mastering all things. Though the physical form—with its hundred bones, nine orifices and six organs—appears complete, which part truly constitutes the "self"? To seek identity solely within the physical form, taking the body as true self and external objects as possessions—this is delusion. Only those who comprehend the Great Dao understand: physical form is inherently impermanent, and even when the body perishes, the indestructible true self remains. Therefore Confucius said "hearing the Dao in morning makes evening death acceptable," Mencius spoke of "unchanging resolve regardless of lifespan," and Yan Hui attained the state of "forgetting both self and objects." If even life and death cannot affect the Dao-awakened, how much less could trivial matters of gain and loss? There is no other mystery here—it is simply knowing that within the form dwells the eternal True Sovereign and Governor, thus physical changes cause no disturbance.

The ancient Perfected Ones (zhiren - Dao-realized beings) never allowed profit to burden their bodies—unlike ordinary people who forget their true nature when seeing advantage. They never let form constrain their spirit—attaining the state of responding to things naturally without deliberate effort. Looking inward at the mind, they saw thoughts as empty; observing outward forms, they perceived physicality as illusory; gazing distantly at all things, they recognized the emptiness of phenomena. When realizing that nothing in creation can be forcibly separated or possessed, they understood even their bodies were not their own. Those who can see the formless form ascend to wander with the Creator and descend to befriend Dao-realized beings who transcend life and death.

 孰足以患心已是則雖寵而不辱雖貴而  無患豈以世之所榮而爲辱人之所樂而  爲患哉伊尹不以寵利居成功而得持寵  之術堯不以位爲樂而得守貴之道幾是  已 故貴以身爲天下若可寄天下愛以身爲天 下若可託天下  徽宗註曰天下大器也非道莫運天下神  器也非道莫守聖人體道故在宥天下天  下樂推而不猒其次則知貴其身而不自  賤以役於物者若可寄而已知愛其身而  不自賊以困於物者若可託而已故曰道  之眞以治身緒餘以爲國家土苴以治天  下世俗之君子廼危身棄生以殉物豈不  悲夫  䟽義曰六合内外無盡無極則天下大器  也必有出乎器者然後能運之出乎器者  道也立乎不測行乎無方則天下神器也  必有與於神者然後能守之與於神者道  也聖人體是以在己故在天下而不淫其  性宥天下而不遷其德自西自東自南自  北無思不服天下樂推而不猒矣其次則  有明乎物物之非物而無以天下爲者知  一節重於一國兩臂重於天下身亦重於  兩臂貴其身而不自賊愛其身而不自賤  若可寄託而已夫豈殘生傷性以身爲殉  樊然殽亂爲物所役薾然疲役爲物所困  不知保身之道歟莊子所謂道之眞以治  身緒餘以爲國家土苴以治天下正謂是  也世俗之君子不知身爲生之主廼殺身
Interpretation

What matters are truly worth worrying about? If one comprehends this principle, they will neither feel humbled by favor nor burdened by high position. Should we consider worldly honor as disgrace, or regard what others pursue as happiness as our own affliction?

Consider the sages of antiquity: Yi Yin (renowned minister of Shang Dynasty) never clung to favor or profit to maintain his achievements, yet mastered the secret of preserving grace; Emperor Yao never treated his throne as pleasure, yet grasped the method of maintaining nobility. This is true wisdom.

Thus it is said: Only those who value themselves more than the world can be entrusted with it; only those who truly cherish their own lives can be given governance over all under heaven.

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: The world resembles a vast vessel—without the Dao, it cannot function; it resembles a magical implement—without the Dao, it cannot be safeguarded. The sage (one who has attained the Dao) unites with the Dao, thus containing the world within. All people gladly support such a person without wearying. Those of lesser attainment, who know to treasure themselves without self-abasement and avoid being enslaved by external things, may temporarily be entrusted with the world; those who understand self-love without self-harm and remain untroubled by externals may briefly be delegated governance. Therefore, the essence of the Dao serves to cultivate the self, its remainder to govern the state, and its dregs to administer the world. How lamentable that worldly gentlemen instead harm their bodies and abandon life to chase external things!

Further explanation: The six directions (heaven and earth, four quarters) are boundless, hence the world is called a vast vessel. What transcends the vessel itself is required to operate it—this transcendent element is the Dao. The Dao resides in the immeasurable and operates without fixed direction, hence the world is called a magical implement. What connects with the magical is needed to safeguard it—this connective element is the Dao.

The sage unites with the Dao, thus dwelling in the world without losing original nature, containing all things without altering virtue. Whether east, west, south or north, none fail to submit joyfully; all people gladly support without wearying. Those of lesser attainment understand the impermanence of all things, thus holding the world lightly. They know: one joint surpasses a kingdom in importance, two arms outweigh the world, yet the whole body surpasses both arms. Valuing self without self-harm, cherishing life without self-abasement—such persons may temporarily be entrusted with the world.

How unlike those who maim life and injure nature, treating their bodies as sacrificial offerings! Chaotically driven by externals, exhaustively troubled by material things, they fundamentally lack understanding of preserving body and spirit. Zhuangzi said, "Use the essence of the Dao to cultivate self, its remainder to govern the state, and its dregs to manage worldly affairs"—this is precisely the meaning. Worldly gentlemen fail to recognize the body as life's foundation, instead mutilating themselves...

 以成名多方以喪生逐物而不返危身棄  生以徇物是猶以隋侯之珠彈千仞之雀  所喪多矣豈不悲夫    視之不見章第十四 視之不見名曰夷  徽宗註曰目主視視以辯物夷則平而無  辯非視所及故名曰夷太易未見氣是已  䟽義曰天三生木在人爲肝肝開竅於目  故於五事爲視則目主視故也明兩作離  寓象於目而目之於色合而後有見則視  以辯物故也然視而可見未離乎色或高  或下可得而辯也妙道非色窅然空然曾  無兆朕視之不足見也其平坦然孰辯高  下列子所謂太易未見氣是已渾淪之初  氣且未見其平可知故名曰夷 聽之不聞名曰希  徽宗註曰耳主聽聽以察物希則穊而有  間非聽所聞故名曰希大音希聲是已  䟽義曰天一生水在藏爲腎腎開竅於耳  故於五事爲聽則耳主聽也水荐至爲坎  寓象於耳而耳之於聲辯而後能聽則聽  以察物故也然聽而可聞未離乎聲迭爲  清濁莫之能間妙道無聲寂兮寥兮曾無  音響聽之不足聞也風濟籟息穊而有間  經所謂大音希聲是已動於無方居於窈  冥其穊可知故名曰希 摶之不得名曰微  徽宗註曰微乎微乎至於無形孰得而摶  之大象無形是已  䟽義曰氣變而後有形有形而後可得至  道之精窈窈冥冥未始有物循之而不得
Interpretation

This scripture explains the Daoist approach to comprehending the Dao (the Way). The Dao transcends the realm of ordinary sensory perception and requires special methods of realization.

Regarding vision: Although eyes can discern shapes and forms, the Dao is perfectly even and undifferentiated, like the state of primordial chaos before even Qi (vital energy) had formed. Thus it is described as "yi" (smooth and featureless). What eyes perceive are things with form and color, while the Dao is formless and invisible to ordinary sight.

Concerning hearing: Though ears can distinguish sounds, the Dao is utterly silent, like the stillness after a great wind has ceased - hence described as "xi" (rare and faint). What ears hear are phenomena producing sound, while the Dao itself is soundless.

Finally regarding touch: Hands grasp physical objects with form, but the Dao is so refined as to be formless, like how the greatest image has no concrete shape. Before Qi condenses into material substance, this subtle state already exists, thus described as "wei" (minute).

Through this negation of ordinary perception, the text reveals that the Dao cannot be known through conventional senses. It transcends the realms of form, color and sound, requiring deeper spiritual realization to apprehend.

 也是謂微乎微乎至於無形者矣有形斯  可搏道之無形孰得而搏之經所謂大象  無形則象之大者孰有過於道者哉夫惟  無形故其大無外也 此三者不可致詰故混而爲一  徽宗註曰太易未判孰分高下大音希聲  孰辯清濁大象無形孰爲巨細目無所用  其明耳无所施其聰形无所竭其力道之  全體於是乎在窮之不可究探之不可得  也氣形質具而未相離故混而爲一雖然  旣已爲一矣且得無言乎  䟽義曰太易未判列子所謂色色者未嘗  呈是也色色者無色孰分高下大音希聲  列子所謂聲聲者未嘗發是也聲聲者無  聲孰辯清濁大象無形列子所謂形形者  未嘗顯是也形形者無形孰爲巨細雖使  離朱當晝拭眥望之而不見其形則目無  所用其明也雖使師曠終夜俛首傾耳而  聽之不聞其聲則耳無所施其聰也雖使  知與喫詬之徒索之而終莫得則形無所  竭其力也自其視之不見言之則曰夷自  其聽之不聞言之則曰希自其搏之不得  言之則曰微三者異名同實其指一也道  之全體於是乎在窮之不可究探之不可  得列子所謂渾淪是也謂之渾淪則以氣  形質具混爲一而未相離故也既已爲一  矣且得無言乎 其上不皦其下不昧  徽宗註曰形而上者陰陽不測幽而難知  兹謂至神故不皦皦言明也形而下者一
Interpretation

This passage explores the profound nature of the Dao. Laozi describes it as "so subtle that it becomes formless" - meaning the Dao is exquisitely refined to the point of having no physical form. While we can grasp things with form, the formless Dao eludes capture. As the scripture states, "The greatest form has no shape" - what could be vaster than the Dao in this world? Precisely because it lacks form, the Dao's greatness knows no bounds.

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: In the stage of "Great Simplicity" (Taiyi, the undifferentiated primordial state in Daoism before heaven and earth separated), how could there be distinctions of high and low? The greatest sound is actually inaudible - who could discern its clarity or turbidity? The greatest form is actually invisible - who could judge its size? Here, eyes cannot see, ears cannot hear, and physical strength cannot reach - yet the complete Dao resides here. Though we exhaustively search, we cannot find it; though we thoroughly probe, we cannot grasp it. This is because Qi (vital energy), form, and substance remain merged as one, not yet separated.

Further explanation: As Liezi states, "That which manifests colors has never appeared" - true color is actually "colorless," so how could shades exist? The greatest sound is actually "soundless," so how could clarity be distinguished? The greatest form is actually "formless," so how could size be measured? Even if Li Zhu (legendary figure with extraordinary eyesight) polished his vision in broad daylight, he couldn't perceive its form - eyes are useless here. Even if Shi Kuang (renowned musician of the Spring and Autumn period) listened intently all night, he couldn't hear its sound - ears are useless here. Even if the wisest person searched, they ultimately couldn't find it - physical form is powerless here.

Visually imperceptible, we call it "Yi" (smooth and traceless); aurally inaudible, we call it "Xi" (silent and soundless); tactilely ungraspable, we call it "Wei" (subtle and imperceptible). These three names differ but refer to the same Dao. What Liezi calls "undifferentiated chaos" describes this state where Qi, form, and substance remain merged as one. Since they're already unified, how can we possibly describe it?

Emperor Huizong further comments: On the metaphysical level (transcending concrete forms), the transformations of Yin-Yang are unfathomably profound - this is the supreme "Shen" (spirit), thus it doesn't appear conspicuously bright ("Jiao" meaning bright). On the physical level...

 陰一陽辯而有數兹謂至道故不昧昧言  幽也易曰神而明之存乎其人  䟽義曰形而上者謂之道而神實妙焉則  神固形而上矣陰知神之在陰而不知其  亦在陽陽知神之在陽而不知其亦在陰  神則陰陽不測也速不疾而行不至惛然  若亡而存是之謂其上不皦形而下者謂  之器而道實寓焉則道亦形而下矣不偏  于陽非獨陽而生不毗于陰非獨陰而成  道則一陰一陽也可以約可以散在無亦  顯是之謂其下不昧蓋皦與皦如之皦同  皦言明也不皦則幽而難知矣昧與昧谷  之昧同昧言幽也不昧則辯而有數矣雖  然茍非其人道不虚行則神而明之存乎  其人故也 繩繩兮不可名復歸於無物  徽宗註曰道之體若晝夜之有經而莫測  其幽明之故豈貌像聲色可得而形容乎  故復歸於無物  䟽義曰繩以約物使不失其直繩繩則不  出乎防範檢押之内也道之倫經有條而  不紊若晝夜之有經一晦一明無或渝也  故謂之繩繩然深妙眇冥無有無名莫測  其幽明之故是以不可名若然則復本歸  根一毫不留非特未始有物而又至於未  始有夫未始有物者矣豈貌像聲色可得  而形容乎是之謂復歸於無物 是謂無狀之狀無物之象是謂恍惚  徽宗註曰無狀之狀無物之象恍兮惚其  中有物惚兮恍其中有象猶如太虚含蓄
Interpretation

Yin and Yang exist in opposition yet unity, and this dynamic principle constitutes the most profound Dao. Thus, the Dao never fully obscures itself in darkness ("昧" signifies obscure unknowability). As the Yijing states: Comprehending this divine mystery depends entirely on one's cultivation.

In essence, the formless dimension is called "Dao," while "Shen" (the numinous function of Dao) manifests this profundity. Shen truly belongs to the formless realm: Yin only recognizes Shen within Yin, unaware it also resides in Yang; Yang only perceives Shen within Yang, oblivious to its presence in Yin. Shen's operation between Yin and Yang is unfathomable—it moves with lightning speed yet never appears hurried, seemingly absent yet undeniably present. This embodies the Dao's characteristic of "not displaying radiance above" (上不皦).

The manifest dimension is called "vessels" (concrete phenomena), wherein the Dao takes residence—thus the Dao also exists in form. The Dao does not favor Yang exclusively, nor does it rely solely on Yang for generation; neither does it prioritize Yin alone or depend on Yin for completion. The Dao is the unity of Yin and Yang, capable of both condensation and dispersion, manifesting even within emptiness. This is the Dao's characteristic of "not sinking into darkness below" (下不昧). "皦" denotes brightness, so "not 皦" implies hidden unknowability; "昧" signifies obscurity, so "not 昧" allows clear discernment. Yet without suitable practitioners, the Dao does not reveal itself—hence comprehending this divine mystery truly depends on the individual.

The Dao resembles formless cords ("绳绳" describing continuous connection) that cannot be captured in language, ultimately returning to voidness. Emperor Huizong of Song comments: The Dao's essence follows orderly alternations like day and night, yet the mystery of its light-dark transformations defies measurement—how could form or sound ever depict it? Thus it ultimately returns to emptiness.

The Dao's movement resembles cords rectifying objects to maintain uprightness—"绳绳" signifies never transgressing normative boundaries. Its operation proceeds with flawless rhythm, like the unerring alternation of day and night or light and dark, hence "绳绳." Profoundly mysterious, formless and nameless, the secrets of its luminous transformations elude comprehension, rendering it unnameable. Viewed thus, when the Dao returns to its source, it sheds all attachments—not only transcending the state of "having substance," but reaching beyond even the concept of "non-substance." How could form or sound possibly describe this? This is the return to voidness.

This is called the formless form, the imageless image—termed "huanghu" (a state of elusive presence). Emperor Huizong annotates: Within the haze of huanghu there seems to exist substance; within the mist of huhuang there appears to emerge form—just as the Supreme Void (cosmic origin) embraces all manifestations.

 萬象而不覩其端倪猶如一性靈智自若  而莫究其運用謂之有而非有謂之無而  非无若日月之去人遠矣以鑒燧求焉而  水火自至水火果何在哉无狀之狀无物  之象亦猶是也  䟽義曰有狀故可見道無見也亦不離見  故爲无狀之狀有形故可象道無形也亦  不離形故爲无物之象无狀之狀無物之  象意其有而非有恍兮惚而中有物也意  其无而非无惚兮恍而中有象也如太虚  一虚化出萬有而未始有封含蓄萬象不  覩其端倪也如一性無性應物不窮而深  不可測靈智自若而莫究其妙用也即有  而無有實非有即無而有無實非無若日  月去人遠矣以方諸取水於月以陽燧取  火於日不旋頃而水火自至水火之爲物  不可以有無期之也無狀之狀無物之象  亦猶是也故謂之恍惚 迎之不見其首隨之不見其後  徽宗註曰其始無首其卒無尾故迎之隨  之有不得而見焉  䟽義曰道之全體混成完具贍之在前孰  原其所始忽焉在後敦要其所終莊子所  謂其始无首其卒无尾是也迎之隨之曾  何有見哉 執古之道以御今之有能知古始是謂道紀  徽宗註曰一陰一陽之謂道師天而无地  者或蔽于道之動而憑其彊陽師陰而无  陽者或溺于道之靜而止於枯槁爲我者  廢仁爲人者廢義豈古之道哉古之道不
Interpretation

This passage describes the profound and mysterious nature of the Dao (the cosmic origin and universal principle). Though formless and shapeless, the Dao gives birth to all things. Just as we cannot see the sun and moon directly yet can use bronze mirrors to kindle fire or concave mirrors to gather water, the Dao—though elusive—truly exists and functions.

The Dao is neither pure being nor pure non-being. It appears to lack concrete form yet contains all forms; it seems devoid of specific images yet encompasses all phenomena. Like the vast void that generates myriad things without leaving traces, or like human nature—invisible and formless—that responds to all situations, this state is called "huanghu" (a hazy, indistinct condition between presence and absence).

The Dao has neither beginning nor end. Tracing forward, we cannot find its source; following backward, we see no conclusion. It is whole and complete, without start or finish. This is what Zhuangzi meant by "having no head or tail."

Those who truly understand the Dao grasp the eternal natural laws ("the ancient Dao") to address present circumstances ("what exists today"). Fixating on one aspect of Yin-Yang—whether valuing only movement and change while neglecting stillness, or pursuing only stillness while denying movement; or either extreme selfishness that abandons compassion, or excessive self-sacrifice that forsakes principles—none of these reflect the true ancient Dao. The ancient Dao is unified and whole. Only those who know the origin of all things have grasped the essence of the Dao ("the guiding principle of the Dao").

 可致詰而非有是謂恍惚而非無執之以  御世則變通以盡利鼓舞以盡神而無不  可者道之大常無易于此所謂自古以固  存者歟故曰能知古始是謂道紀  䟽義曰立天之道曰陰與陽則道雖非陰  陽亦不離陰陽故也昧於道者分陰分陽  或悦生而累形則蔽于道之動而憑其彊  陽或趨寂以忘身則溺於道之靜而止乎  枯槁爲墨氏之兼愛者爲人而廢義至於  無見於畸爲楊氏之爲我者爲我而廢仁  至於蕩而不法不該不偏蔽於一曲豈古  之道哉古之道有不廢无不可致詰而非  有无不外有是謂恍惚而非无操此爲驗  稽此爲决以應萬變以對方來變通足以  盡利鼓舞足以盡神其於御世无不可者  此古之道也是道也長於上古而不爲老  未有天地自古以固存維綱宰制凡囿於  物未有外是而能立者道之大常無易于  此惟能探物之先而知其始則道之倫經
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the essential nature and operational principles of the Dao (the Way). The Dao, as the cosmic origin and governing principle, neither reduces to mere Yin-Yang polarity nor exists independently of it. Those who fail to comprehend the Dao either become attached to dualistic distinctions—clinging to life while being constrained by physical form, thus bewildered by the Dao's dynamic transformations—or pursue quiescence to the point of self-oblivion, stagnating through excessive fixation on the Dao's static aspect.

The text critiques two extremes: the Mohist school (Moism) overemphasized universal love at the expense of Daoist principles, blinding them to particularities; while the Yang Zhu faction (Yangism) pursued self-interest to the exclusion of benevolence, becoming licentious and lawless. Both represent partial understandings inconsistent with the ancient, authentic Dao.

The true Dao neither discards the myriad phenomena nor clings to distinctions of being and non-being. It abides in a "huanghu" state (indeterminate, neither wholly existent nor wholly void). Mastering this principle enables one to adapt to all transformations and face the future with equanimity. Flexibility maximizes benefit, while inspiration fully reveals divine wonder—nothing in governance remains beyond its capacity.

This Dao existed prior to antiquity, eternally present before heaven and earth manifested. As the fundamental law governing all phenomena, nothing exists independent of it. This essential characteristic of the Dao remains immutable. Only those who investigate the origin of things and comprehend their beginnings can grasp the Dao's guiding principles (gangji)—hence this is called "the Dao's guiding framework."

The text emphasizes that the ancient, authentic Dao neither negates phenomena nor fails to encompass all. Transcending the dichotomy of being and non-being, it dwells in an ineffable, subtle state. Applying this standard to examine affairs and resolve dilemmas enables responsiveness to infinite change. Such wisdom fully actualizes benefit while manifesting the Dao's profundity, rendering all governance attainable.

 皆在我矣故曰是謂道紀 道德眞經䟽義卷之三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0079); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →