中文 · EN

《道德真經疏義(一)》Vol. 5

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 5 / 14 11,606 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經疏義(一)》 Vol. 5 (Dongshen 洞神部, 14 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 23 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經疏義(一)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經䟽義卷之五莫五     太學生江澂䟽    大道廢章第十八 大道廢有仁義  徽宗註曰失道而後德失德而後仁失仁  而後義仁以立人義以立我而去道也遠  矣韓愈不原聖人道德之意廼以謂仁與  義爲定名道與德爲虚位老君之小仁義  其所見者小也莊子所謂蔽蒙之民  䟽義曰道之大全冥於渾淪之中德分於  道判爲剛柔之用蓋道不可致故道失而  德德不可至故德失而仁仁可爲也爲之  則近乎義故仁失而義所以去道爲愈遠  即其本而論之則道一而已楊子所謂合  則渾離則散者此也韓愈不原聖人道德  之意乃以臆見曲說謂仁與義爲定名道  與德爲虚位以老君小仁義爲所見者小  殊不知仁義不外道德道德不廢安取仁  義探本言之雖曰攘棄仁義而仁義已行  於道德之間矣是其心豈眞以仁義爲不  足以治天下哉其小仁義乃所以尊仁義  也正莊周所謂蔽蒙之民也後世之士蔽  於俗學無高明之見聞老氏之道術遂至  於狂而不信而卑汙蹇淺末世窮年不免  爲陋儒愈有以發之也 智慧出有大僞  徽宗註曰民知力竭則以僞繼之  䟽義曰至德之世民居不知所爲行不知  所之適性而足安分而止功利機巧必忘  夫人之心何所用其智力哉迨其欲慮一  萌物誘於外智不足則困力不足則怠失
Interpretation

This passage explains how society only emphasizes benevolence, righteousness, and morality after deviating from the fundamental "Great Dao (the Way)." The original text progressively illustrates: when the most essential Dao is lost, people turn to De (Virtue/Power); when De is also lost, they emphasize humaneness; when humaneness is lacking, they finally rely on righteousness to maintain order. Though benevolence and righteousness can regulate human behavior, they are already far removed from the true Dao.

Han Yu (a Tang Dynasty literary figure) failed to grasp the sages' original intent regarding Dao and De, treating benevolence and righteousness as fixed standards while viewing Dao and De as abstract concepts. The reason Laozi downplayed benevolence and righteousness was that he observed matters from a higher, more profound perspective. What Zhuangzi called "the people blinded by delusion" refers precisely to those obscured by worldly conventions.

Fundamentally, Dao is an undivided whole. The relationship between Dao-De and benevolence-righteousness resembles that between the whole and its parts—combined they form the complete Dao, separated they lose their wholeness. Laozi wasn't truly asserting that benevolence and righteousness couldn't govern the world; his devaluation of them was precisely to genuinely honor them. Later scholars, blinded by conventional learning, couldn't comprehend Laozi's profound thought, even considering his teachings arrogant and unbelievable, remaining lifelong in shallow understanding as pedantic Confucians.

The passage continues with "when wisdom emerges, great artifice appears." In the era of perfect Dao-De, people lived spontaneously without deliberate effort. Only when desires and calculations arose, when external things tempted the human heart, did insufficient wisdom lead to confusion and inadequate strength to indolence. At this point, after exhausting their cunning and strength, people began resorting to deception.

(Note: "Great Dao" refers to the supreme truth in Daoism; "De" is the concrete manifestation of Dao; "benevolence-righteousness" are the moral norms advocated by Confucianism; "people blinded by delusion" comes from Zhuangzi, referring to those obscured by worldly conventions.)

 其常然而汨於人爲所謂民智力竭而以  僞繼之也聖人在宥天下欲斯民之復其  性亦不以智治國而已故列子曰聖人恃  道化而不恃智巧 六親不和有孝慈國家昏亂有忠臣  徽宗註曰名生于不足故也莊子曰孝子  不諛其親忠臣不諂其君臣子之盛也  䟽義曰名者實之賔茍有其實名必從之  然名常生於不足夫君子之成名莫大乎  忠孝事其親者不擇地而安之斯爲孝茍  以親之所言而然所行而善以諛其親非  所謂孝事其君者不擇事而安之斯爲忠  茍以君之所言而然所行而善以詁其君  非所謂忠惟不諛其親不詁其君則忠孝  之心無餘藴矣此臣子之盛也    絕聖棄智章第十九 絶聖棄智民利百倍  徽宗註曰道與之性一而不雜離道爲德  是名聖智聖智立而天下始有喬詰卓鷙  之行驚愚而明汙譽堯而非桀則聖智之  利天下也少而害天下也多絶而棄之與  道同體則各安其性命之情其利博矣  䟽義曰無受之初性與道冥有受之後性  與道違惟與道冥故無差殊所謂道與之  性一而不雜者是也惟與道違故有分際  所謂離道爲德是名聖智者此也原性之  始妙本渾全聖智下愚初無殊品離道者  外立其德失眞沈僞迷而不復因愚顯智  遂有聖名聖智立則不能因性之自然而
Interpretation

People are often troubled by worldly behaviors—this is what is meant by "the common people exhaust their cleverness yet still fall into falsehood." The sage governs the world by desiring that the people return to their original nature, and thus does not rely on cunning to rule. As Liezi said: "The sage relies on the teachings of the Dao, not on clever schemes."

When family relations are disharmonious, filial sons and loving mothers become conspicuous; when the state is in chaos, loyal ministers stand out. Emperor Huizong of Song commented: "These titles arise precisely because true virtue is lacking." Zhuangzi also said: "A truly filial son does not flatter his parents, and a truly loyal minister does not fawn upon his ruler—this is the highest standard of a subject."

The commentary explains: Reputation is the shadow of reality. Where true virtue exists, reputation naturally follows. Yet reputation often emerges precisely where virtue is deficient. For a noble person, the greatest reputations are loyalty and filial piety: Serving one's parents with equanimity regardless of circumstances—this is true filial piety; blindly agreeing with every word and action to please them is not. Serving one's ruler with full dedication in all matters—this is true loyalty; currying favor by echoing every opinion is not. Only by neither flattering parents nor fawning upon rulers can the heart of loyalty and filial piety be fully revealed—this is indeed the highest attainment of a subject.

Regarding the chapter "Reject Sageliness and Discard Wisdom" (Chapter 19): "When sagely wisdom is abandoned, the people benefit a hundredfold." Emperor Huizong commented: "The nature bestowed by the Dao is originally pure and unadulterated. When one departs from the Dao to pursue virtue, the concept of 'sagely wisdom' emerges. Once sagely wisdom is glorified, the world begins to see eccentric behaviors—startling the world to display superiority, praising Yao and Shun while denouncing Jie and Zhou. Thus sagely wisdom brings few benefits but much harm to the world. Abandon these empty titles, return to unity with the Dao, and let all things rest in their nature—only then will the benefits be truly vast."

The commentary further explains: In the primal state before worldly influences, human nature is one with the Dao; after worldly influences, nature separates from the Dao. Unity with the Dao knows no distinctions—this is the meaning of "the Dao and one's nature are one and unadulterated." Separation from the Dao creates divisions—this is "departing from the Dao to pursue virtue is called sagely wisdom." Tracing the origin of nature, it was originally whole and complete—originally there was no difference between sagely wisdom and foolishness. Those who stray from the Dao establish external standards of virtue, losing their true nature and drowning in falsehood. Folly makes cleverness conspicuous, hence the title "sage" emerges. Once standards of sagely wisdom are established, the natural state of original nature can no longer be followed.

 天下始有喬詰卓鷙之行喬則爲亢詰則  窮深卓則難及鷙則不群皆非平易中正  之行也於是飾智驚愚脩身明汙譽堯而  非桀曾不知兩忘而化其道則聖智之利  天下也少而害天下也多正與莊周言悦  聖耶是相於蓻悦智耶是相於疵之意同  矣惟知絶而棄之與道同體則因性自然  舉天下於無爲之治無爲也而後安其性  命之情蓋民復素樸安其性命則與一世  而得澹漠其利可勝計耶信所謂其利博  矣 絶仁棄義民復孝慈  徽宗註曰孝慈天性也蹩躠爲仁踶跂爲  義而以仁義易其性矣絶仁棄義則民將  反其性而復其初不獨親其親不獨子其  子其於孝慈也何有  䟽義曰百行以孝爲本三寳以慈爲先孝  慈之心生於固有之天性非僞爲也非外  鑠也至於蹩躠爲仁而行非自然踶跂爲  義而强於用力則是仁義易其性矣絶仁  棄義民將性修反德德至同於初是謂反  其性而復其初也若然則大道之行天下  爲公不獨親其親老吾老以及人之老不  獨子其子幼吾幼以及人之幼相愛而不  知以爲仁端正而不知以爲義其於孝慈  也人皆有之殆不知其所以然而然 絶巧棄利盜賊無有  徽宗註曰爲機變之巧者無所用耻有欲  利之心者不顧其義是皆穿窬之類也  䟽義曰不羞惡則無以知恥不知耻則無
Interpretation

This passage discusses how when society begins to value contrived originality and deliberate artifice, chaos inevitably follows. The term "qiao ji zhuo zhi" refers to four unnatural behaviors: arrogance (qiao), sophistry (ji), forced originality (zhuo), and antisocial eccentricity (zhi)—all deviations from the balanced and upright way of being.

People begin flaunting cleverness to deceive the simple, polishing their own image while exposing others' flaws, paying lip service to the virtues of legendary sage-kings Yao and Shun while secretly emulating the tyranny of Jie and Zhou. They fail to realize that only by relinquishing these artificial distinctions can one harmonize with the Dao. When the wisdom of sages is deliberately employed, it often brings more harm than benefit to the world—echoing Zhuangzi's warning that "venerating sages breeds hypocrisy, while prizing cleverness fosters fault-finding."

Only by abandoning such affectations and returning to natural simplicity can the world achieve governance through Wuwei (non-action). Wuwei doesn't mean inaction, but allowing all things to abide in their authentic state. When people regain their original simplicity, society attains harmony and peace—benefits beyond measure.

Regarding "rejecting benevolence and righteousness to restore filial piety": Filial devotion is innate human nature. But when benevolence (ren) and righteousness (yi) become contrived ideals (forced like strained steps or tiptoed postures), they distort our true nature. Only by discarding these external standards can people rediscover genuine filial love. This doesn't mean abandoning respect for parents, but reaching the natural state where "one treats elders with the reverence due one's own parents, and cares for others' children as one's own"—people love sincerely without calling it "benevolence," act rightly without labeling it "righteousness."

Concerning "rejecting cleverness and profit to eliminate theft": Those who scheme lack shame; profit-seekers disregard morality. These are the roots of banditry (like tunneling thieves). When people lose their sense of shame, they know no disgrace; without disgrace, nothing is forbidden.

 以行義人之爲人以行己有恥爲貴以見  利思義爲先能明乎此然後無爲其所不  爲無欲其所不欲而歸於君子之途矣彼  其爲機變之巧者則純白不備道所不載  是無所用恥也彼其有欲利之心者則依  仁蹈利讎僞假眞是不顧其義也無所用  恥不顧其義則爲其所不爲欲其所不欲  蓋異於非其有而取之者幾希所謂是皆  穿窬之類也者以此 此三者以爲文不足故令有所屬  徽宗註曰先王以人道治天下至周而彌  文及其弊也以文滅質文有餘而質不足  天下舉失其素樸之眞而日淪于私欲之  習老氏當周之末世方將祛其弊而使之  反本故攘棄仁義絶滅禮學雖聖智亦在  所擯彼其心豈眞以仁義聖智爲不足以  治天下哉先王之道若循環捄文者莫若  質故令有所屬謂見素抱樸少私寡欲也  䟽義曰夫寒積而成暑非一日也觀天時  以驗人事則先王以人道治天下由簡以  至備所以至周而彌文當是時事爲之制  曲爲之防郁郁之文莫盛乎此然文極則  弊患於滅質文有餘於尚華質不足於居  實天下舉失其素樸之眞而凋於浮僞日  淪於私欲之習而蔽於小智可不因其弊  而救之乎老氏當周之末方將祛其弊而  使之反本意有在於斯也故攘棄仁義而  復性於自然絶滅禮學而相忘於道術雖
Interpretation

A person should take practicing righteousness as the foundation, value the sense of shame that comes with self-restraint, and consider righteousness first when facing personal gain. Understanding this principle ensures one refrains from improper actions and avoids coveting what should not be possessed—thus walking the path of a noble person. Those who indulge in cunning schemes and opportunism lack integrity in their innate nature, which is unacceptable to the Dao, for they fundamentally lack any sense of shame.

Those driven by greed may outwardly feign virtue while secretly pursuing selfish interests, blurring the line between truth and falsehood, completely disregarding righteousness. Without shame or regard for righteousness, they transgress their proper boundaries, coveting what does not belong to them—behavior scarcely different from theft. These three tendencies (lack of shame, disregard for righteousness, and coveting what is improper) cannot be restrained by mere ritual codes alone; thus, they must be rectified at their root.

Emperor Huizong of Song commented: The ancient sage-kings governed the world with the principles of benevolence and righteousness, but by the Zhou dynasty, ritual had become excessively elaborate. At its extreme, form overshadowed substance, leaving excessive ornamentation but insufficient simplicity—causing people to lose their innate purity and sink deeper into selfish desires and habits. Laozi, living in the decline of the Zhou dynasty, sought to dismantle these corruptions and return humanity to its original truth. Hence, he advocated discarding benevolence and righteousness, abolishing ritual learning, and even rejecting sagely wisdom—not because these were incapable of governing, but because the Way of the ancient kings moves in cycles. To correct the excesses of superficial refinement, the best method is to return to simplicity. "Rectifying at the root" means preserving one’s innate purity and reducing selfish desires.

Further elaboration: The bitter cold accumulates before the height of summer—it is not the work of a single day. Observing the transformations of heaven’s timing allows us to understand human affairs. The ancient kings governed the world through human principles, progressing from simplicity to completeness, until the Zhou dynasty, when ritual reached its peak of elaboration. At that time, rules were established for every matter, precautions set in every place, and the rites and music system flourished. But when form reaches its extreme, flaws emerge—excessive ornamentation overshadows substance, and the people lose their innate purity, becoming lost in artificial refinement, blinded by selfish desires and petty cleverness. Faced with such a state, how could one not seek to correct it? Laozi, in the late Zhou period, advocated dismantling these corruptions to restore humanity to its original truth—this was his intent. Thus, he called for discarding benevolence and righteousness to return people to their natural state and abandoning ritual learning so they might forget themselves in the great Dao. These teachings were all aimed at addressing the excesses of the time.

 聖智亦在所擯而莫之尚蓋欲天下輕末  而重本祛其迹故也彼其心豈眞以仁義  聖智爲不足以治天下哉夏尚忠商尚質  周尚文或因或革或損或益先王之道若  循環也然文之弊不可不救之以質亦猶  四時之序夏反而爲秋也捄文莫若質故  令有所屬也下文所謂見素抱樸少私寡  欲此有所屬也 見素  徽宗註曰語曰繪事後素素未受色見素  則純粹而不雜  䟽義曰繪事以素爲先故語曰繪事後素  素未受色則白立而采色未彰素者性之  質也謂之素以其不染諸物而已見素則  明白洞達而一疵不覩純白内備而機心  不存所謂純粹而不雜者也與莊子言明  白入素與夫素也者謂其無所與雜也同  意 抱樸  徽宗註曰經曰樸散則爲器樸未嘗斲抱  樸則靜一而不變莊子曰同乎無欲是謂  素樸素樸而民性得矣  䟽義曰器用以樸爲本故經曰樸散則爲  器樸未嘗斲則體全而雕琢不加樸者性  之眞也謂之樸以不雕以人僞而已抱樸  則敦兮若樸而性眞自全無爲復樸而虚  靜恬淡所謂靜一而不變者也與莊子言  純樸不殘之樸同意然則素樸者民之常  性也復性之常則淡然無欲自得其得正  莊子所謂同乎無欲是謂素樸素樸而民  性得也 少私寡欲  徽宗註曰自營爲私而養心莫善於寡欲
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist philosophy of returning to simplicity in governance. It suggests that even the wisdom of sages must sometimes be relinquished, guiding people to disregard trivial matters and focus on the fundamental Dao. This doesn't imply that benevolence, righteousness, and sage wisdom cannot govern the world, but rather mirrors how the Xia dynasty valued loyalty, the Shang prized simplicity, and the Zhou emphasized ritual refinement—each adapting governance to its historical context. Just as the autumn's austerity naturally follows summer's exuberance, the best remedy for excessive ritual refinement is returning to primal simplicity. Thus, people must have something authentic to return to, which leads to the subsequent teaching: "Manifest plainness and embrace simplicity; reduce selfishness and diminish desires."

"Manifest plainness" is like preparing undyed silk before painting—maintaining a state of pure potential, untainted by artifice. This metaphor describes how one should cultivate clarity and purity of mind, free from cunning, achieving a state of unadulterated simplicity. This resonates with Zhuangzi's concept of "clarity entering plainness," both advocating the preservation of one's innate nature uncontaminated by external influences.

"Embrace simplicity" refers to how raw, unworked wood (pu) transforms into utensils when carved. By preserving wood in its natural state, one safeguards its essential character. Similarly, humans should maintain their innate authenticity like uncarved timber—cultivating sincerity, returning to the tranquil, unadorned nature of the Dao. This aligns with Zhuangzi's notion of "unspoiled simplicity." Plainness and simplicity constitute our fundamental nature; returning to it fosters detachment from desires and spontaneous realization of true virtue.

"Reduce selfishness and diminish desires" identifies self-interest as the root of selfishness, while the supreme method of self-cultivation lies in desire reduction. The entire passage emphasizes the paramount importance of returning to authenticity and minimizing selfish desires—the very foundation of Daoist self-cultivation and governance.

 少私寡欲則定乎内外之分辨乎眞僞之  歸德全而性復聖智之名泯矣  䟽義曰蔽於一己則失其大同故自營爲  私牽於利欲則汨其虚靜故養心莫善於  寡欲私也欲也皆外游是務而非内觀皆  人僞是滋而非性眞惟少私寡欲然後能  定乎内外之分而知所輕重辨乎眞僞之  歸而明於本末不遷其德而德全不淫其  性而性復爲無爲事無事而聖智之名泯  矣有治天下者哉    絕學無憂章第二十 絶學無憂  徽宗註曰學以窮理方其務學以窮理思  慮善否參稽治亂能勿憂乎學以致道見  道而絶學損之又損之以至於無爲而無  不爲則任其性命之情無適而不樂故無  憂  䟽義曰理猶里也可以數度惟務學乃能  探其頤道猶路也人所共由惟絶學乃能  極其至學以窮理學之始也故經曰爲學  日益蓋方其務學以窮理則思慮善否而  求諸心參稽治亂而通其度是未能忘於  思爲之益也能勿憂乎孔子以學之不講  爲憂者此也學以致道學之終也故經曰  爲道日損及其見道而絶學則墮肢體黜  聰明離形去智而萬事銷亡損之又損而  未始有物夫未始有物以至於無爲而無  不爲則寂然不動感而遂通任其性命之  情樂以忘憂無適而不樂焉故無憂孔子  以飯䟽食飲水樂亦在其中者此也文子
Interpretation

Diminishing selfish thoughts and reducing desires allows one to clearly distinguish between inner cultivation and external pursuits, discerning true nature from artificial constructs. When virtue (De) becomes complete and original nature is restored, even titles like "sage" or "wise one" naturally fade away.

The commentary explains: Focusing solely on personal gain severs one's connection with the unity of heaven, earth, and all things—thus self-serving calculation constitutes selfishness. Being entangled by material desires disrupts the empty stillness of the heart-mind, making desire reduction the supreme method of self-cultivation. Both selfishness and desires represent outward grasping rather than inward contemplation; they foster artificial striving rather than returning to authentic nature. Only by reducing selfish desires can one distinguish between internal and external priorities, recognize what's fundamental versus secondary, and discern truth from illusion. Preserving virtue (De) requires not deviating from it; restoring original nature demands not indulging desires. Acting through non-action (Wuwei) and engaging with the world through non-interference—even honorific titles like "sage" or "wise one" become irrelevant. Why then would deliberate governance be necessary?

Chapter 20 ("Cutting Off Learning") states: "Abandon conventional learning and be free from worries."

Emperor Huizong of Song annotates: Learning originally seeks truth, but when people devote themselves to scholarship, they inevitably ponder right and wrong, examine order and chaos—how could this not generate worries? Authentic learning should lead to the Dao (the Way). Upon realizing the Dao, one transcends accumulated knowledge. Continuously diminish acquired knowledge until reaching non-action (Wuwei) that nevertheless accomplishes all things. By following life's innate authenticity, one finds joy in any circumstance—thus becoming worry-free.

Further explanation: "Principles" resemble milestones on a road—quantifiable through study—while the Dao is the universal path accessible only by transcending conventional learning. Investigating principles through study marks the beginning of cultivation (hence Laozi's "pursuing learning means increasing daily"). But when examining principles, people exhaust their minds weighing gains and losses, analyzing order and chaos—this remains within the realm of artificial striving. How could it not bring worry? Confucius' concern about "learning without reflection" speaks to this. Realizing the Dao through learning represents cultivation's ultimate goal (hence Laozi's "practicing the Dao means decreasing daily"). Upon truly perceiving the Dao and transcending scholarship, one releases bodily attachments, silences sensory disturbances, and surpasses form and cleverness—all affairs naturally resolve themselves. Through continuous diminishment, one returns to primordial purity before the ten thousand things arose. In this state of no-self and non-being, one achieves non-action (Wuwei) that accomplishes everything—the mind becomes serenely still yet spontaneously responsive. Following life's authentic flow, joy dissolves sorrow, and contentment arises in any situation. As Confucius observed: "With coarse rice to eat, water to drink, happiness exists right there."

 曰心有不樂無樂而不爲而終之以可謂  能體道矣然則爲道日損故能樂道於此  明矣 唯之與阿相去幾何善之與惡相去何若  徽宗註曰唯阿同聲善惡一性小智自私  離而爲二達人大觀本實非異聖人之經  世在宗廟朝廷與大夫言不齊如此遏惡  揚善惟恐不至人之所畏不可不畏故也  䟽義曰以道冥物則同異所以藏以物分  道則同異所以立自情言之以唯爲恭以  阿爲慢善在所好惡在所惡固不同也即  理觀之唯阿之發同於一聲善惡之混根  於一性孰爲差别小智自私任情者也任  情而私則各植一見妄爲區别所謂離而  爲二者此也達人大觀任理者也任理以  觀則總攝萬殊同爲至妙所謂本實非異  者此也聖人冥心於道不見一物然於世  人善惡不能有廢者蓋不欲自異於世而  已是以出而經世在宗廟朝廷則便便以  辨治爲事與下大夫言則有侃侃之和與  上大夫言則有誾誾之欽所以稱情而爲  禮爲禮以辨異故其不齊如此若然則惡  者遏之善者揚之以公天下之是非以示  天下之好惡惟恐不至則以人之所畏不  可不畏俯而與人同也 人之所畏不可不畏  徽宗註曰鼓萬物而不與聖人同憂者道  也吉凶與民同患者事也體道者無憂涉  事者有畏人之所畏而不知爲之戒能無
Interpretation

Laozi teaches that when the mind is free from attachment to pleasure, one can naturally act without forced joy, ultimately achieving true realization of the Dao (the Way). The path of cultivation involves daily reduction of attachments, through which genuine happiness is attained—this principle is profoundly clear.

How far apart are the respectful "wei" and the dismissive "a"? What truly separates good from evil? Emperor Huizong of Song comments: Both "wei" and "a" are sounds; both good and evil arise from innate nature. Those with petty cleverness cling to selfish distinctions, forcibly dividing them into opposites, while the enlightened perceive their fundamental unity, recognizing no inherent difference.

When sages govern the world, their manner of speech varies between ancestral temples and court halls when addressing officials. They suppress wrongdoing and promote virtue, ever concerned about falling short. This is because what people fear, even sages cannot disregard.

From the perspective of the Dao, all things are fundamentally one, and distinctions dissolve; yet from the concrete view of phenomena, differences emerge. Emotionally, people consider "wei" respectful and "a" dismissive, loving good and hating evil—these distinctions feel real. But in principle, both "wei" and "a" are mere sounds; both good and evil stem from the same nature—where lies any essential difference?

Petty minds indulge personal biases, stubbornly imposing artificial divisions, thus fragmenting what is inherently whole. The enlightened follow cosmic principles (Tianli), perceiving that all phenomena, despite their myriad forms, ultimately manifest the profound Dao. While sages immerse themselves in cultivation, free from attachments, they cannot remain indifferent to worldly good and evil, lest they become completely detached from human affairs.

Thus when sages govern, they adapt their speech appropriately: warm and approachable with subordinates, respectful and dignified with superiors. This demonstrates harmonizing with human relations through ritual propriety (Li), using ceremony to distinguish hierarchy. Wrongdoing must be restrained, virtue must be encouraged—judging worldly matters with impartiality to clarify standards of good and evil, ever vigilant against inadequacy. What people fear, sages too must heed, bending to maintain solidarity with the multitude.

Emperor Huizong further explains: The great Dao nurtures all things without the sage's anxiety—this is the Dao's realm; sharing joys and sorrows with the people—this is the sage's work. Those embodying the Dao remain unworried; those handling worldly affairs maintain vigilance. Without heeding what people fear, how could calamities be avoided?

 患者鮮矣故君子以恐懼脩省詩曰畏天  之威  䟽義曰偶而應之者道也道則何思何慮  鼓萬物而不與聖人同憂所謂寂然不動  也匿而爲之者事也事則有思有爲吉凶  與民同患所謂感而遂通天下之故也體  道者入而侔於天故無憂涉事者出而交  於人故有畏人之所畏而不知爲之戒能  無患者鮮矣惟翼翼以盡其欽業業以致  其愼然後能動必迪吉而無悔吝之虞也  易曰君子以恐懼脩省詩曰畏天之威是  皆戒之至也蓋恐懼脩省思患豫防之若  伯益之儆戒無虞是也畏天之威以保天  下若高宗之嚴恭寅畏者是也觀此則知  人之所畏不可不畏者厥理明矣 荒兮其未央哉  徽宗註曰世故之萬變紛糾而不可治難  終難窮未始有極所謂善惡特未定也惟  達者知通爲一  䟽義曰六合之大萬物之多擾擾萬緒日  投其前紛藉交錯繁不勝應則世故之萬  變紛糾而不可治也周旋如轉輪反復如  引鋸叢至沓來無有端倪則難終難測而  未始有極也彼亦一是非此亦一是非所  謂善惡特未定也世人善在所可惡在所  否則是其所非非其所是雖有可否皆出  於彼是之域而已烏知所謂恢詭譎怪道  通爲一者乎惟達者釋智回光照之于天  則物之所謂彼者果有定體耶無定體則  物無非彼矣物之所謂是者果有定體耶
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the attitude and wisdom of Dao practitioners when facing worldly affairs.

Those who truly understand the Dao (the Way) have minds aligned with the heavenly principles, thus remaining free from worries. The Dao operates spontaneously, never troubling itself with worldly matters as sages do. While the Dao itself is silent and unmoving, its manifestation in concrete matters produces myriad transformations. Those handling practical affairs must deliberate and plan, sharing both fortune and misfortune with the common people.

People often fear certain things without knowing true vigilance—few can avoid calamity this way. Only by maintaining constant reverence and acting with cautious prudence can one ensure auspicious actions without regret. The Book of Changes states "the noble person cultivates self-reflection through awe," while the Book of Songs says "revere the majesty of heaven"—both represent the highest form of circumspection. Just as Boyi (the sage minister of Emperor Shun) remained ever vigilant against contingencies, and King Wuding of Shang (Gaozong) maintained the Mandate of Heaven through reverent caution, these examples demonstrate what humans ought to hold in awe.

The transformations of worldly phenomena are endless, their complexity defying orderly arrangement, while standards of good and evil remain elusive. Ordinary people invariably judge right and wrong by their own standards, affirming what they deem good and rejecting what they consider bad. But do "good" and "bad" truly possess fixed criteria? Only those of penetrating understanding realize all things share the same essence, attaining the wisdom that dissolves attachments and distinctions. When returning to one's natural state, one discovers no fixed boundaries between "that" and "this" in the fundamental nature of things.

 無定體則物無非是矣物無彼是則知通  爲一美惡善否蓋將簡之而不得又何譾  譾然區别於其間哉 衆人熙熙如享太牢如春登臺  徽宗註曰凡物以陽熙以陰凝熙熙者敷  榮外見之象衆人失性之靜外游是務如  悦厚味以養口體如覩高華以娛心志耽  樂之徒去道彌遠  䟽義曰陰陽者氣之大也物之孕氣以陽  而熙陽融而亨故也以陰而凝陰止而靜  故也或熙或凝唯其時物則熙熙者敷榮  外見之象衆人失性之靜與物俱化務外  游不務内觀如悦厚味以養口體曾不知  淡乎無味非直太牢之享也如覩高華以  娛心志曾不知見曉冥冥非直春臺之登  也耽樂之徒皆累於物所以去道彌遠使  其妙觀一性則萬法皆備即動而靜眞樂  自全其於道也夫何遠之有 我獨怕兮其未兆若嬰兒之未孩  徽宗註曰經曰復歸於嬰兒莊子曰不至  乎孩而始誰嬰兒欲慮未萌疏戚一視怕  兮靜止和順積中而英華不兆于外故若  嬰兒之未孩  䟽義曰人之有生形體密化其在嬰兒則  性空無知經所謂常德不離而繼之以復  歸於嬰兒者是也孩提則親愛已兆莊子  所謂子生五月而能言不至乎孩而始誰  者是也惟嬰兒之無知故居不知所爲行  不知所之欲慮未萌而無所思疏戚一視  而無所擇怕兮靜止則氣和而不暴性醇
Interpretation

This scripture conveys two main teachings:

The first explains the principle of "non-discrimination." When one relinquishes fixed perceptions of things, all phenomena are inherently undifferentiated. Concepts like beauty and ugliness, good and evil are artificial distinctions—no clear boundaries truly exist, so why insist on dividing them? Ordinary people chase sensory pleasures, attending grand feasts (the "Great Sacrifice" refers to ancient rituals offering oxen, sheep, and pigs) or enjoying spring outings, yet they remain enslaved by external desires. In the movement of Yin-Yang (the two fundamental energies in Daoist cosmology), Yang Qi fosters growth and vitality, while Yin Qi brings stillness and consolidation. Most people lose their original nature, pursuing fleeting pleasures without realizing the Dao's subtle nourishment—its flavorless essence surpasses any feast, and its profound wisdom offers deeper joy than any excursion. Those addicted to sensory delights drift further from the Dao. By quietly observing one's true nature, the principles of all things become clear, revealing genuine contentment within stillness and movement alike.

The second uses an infant as a metaphor for the realized state. True practitioners resemble a baby who hasn't yet learned to smile ("unresponsive" describes the pre-conscious state), preserving primordial purity. The Daode Jing advises "returning to the state of an infant," while Zhuangzi notes that babies, before developing self-awareness, remain closest to natural authenticity. Such infants harbor no desires or schemes, treating closeness and distance equally with serene harmony—all virtues remain inwardly contained without display. Like an infant's spontaneous, uncalculated actions free from deliberate choice, this is the state cultivators should maintain.

 而未散和順積中而華不兆於外則因性  自然而不假人事之華藻故若嬰兒之未  孩蓋怕者心無所受也心無所受則淡然  無物抱一守眞與嬰兒之未孩奚擇老氏  垂世立教蓋欲使民復歸於嬰兒是以於  專氣致柔則曰能如嬰兒於含德之厚則  曰比於赤子其立言雖殊其欲性脩反德  德至同於初則一而已 乗乗兮若无所歸  徽宗註曰易曰時乗六龍以御天乗乗者  因時任理而不倚于一偏故若無所歸  䟽義曰萬物之變膠擾不齊唯變所適無  所繫輆斯可以言乗乗易曰時乗六龍以  御天龍以時乗蓋言乾道變化在乎趨時  而已惟趨時則即彼之理因而乗之豈更  駕哉故乗乗則因持而無所忤任理而莫  之違順物自然而不倚於一偏故若無所  歸與所謂萬物畢羅莫足以歸同意 衆人皆有餘  徽宗註曰或問衆人曰富貴生貪生而慕  利者奢泰之心勝而損約之志微故皆有  餘其在道曰餘食贅行  䟽義曰聖人重其道而輕其禄衆人輕其  道而重其禄聖人曰於道行歟衆人曰於  禄殖歟楊雄欲救當時之弊故設或人之  問衆人而曰富貴生也蓋晋楚之富富以  利也敦若保其至當趙孟之貴貴以爵也  孰若存其良貴惟衆人見物而不見道貪  生以肆其情慕利以窮其欲奢泰之心勝  而侈靡者多損約之志微而節儉者寡故
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates two core principles:

First, it explains the concept of "following the natural disposition" (因性自然). Like the pure and innocent state of an infant, free from external desires that disturb the mind, one should preserve their original, authentic nature. Laozi (Lao氏) teaches people to return to this childlike simplicity. Though the Daode Jing employs different expressions such as "concentrating the Qi (气) to become supple" (专气致柔) and "embracing the fullness of De (德)" (含德之厚), the fundamental purpose remains the same—to guide people back to their original, unadorned nature.

Second, it interprets the meaning of "riding upon riding, as if with no destination" (乘乘兮若无所归). Here, "riding upon riding" refers to an attitude of conforming to natural laws without stubbornly clinging to personal views. As the Yijing states, "timely riding the six dragons to traverse heaven" (时乘六龙以御天), one should act like a dragon, moving in accordance with changing circumstances. The truly wise adapt to the transformations of all things without bias, appearing as if they hold no fixed position—precisely because they embrace the myriad things.

The text then addresses the issue of "the multitude all have surplus" (众人皆有余). Ordinary people often excessively pursue wealth, pleasure, and material gain. They value salary and status over righteousness, indulging their desires without restraint. In contrast, the sage values moral cultivation above material comforts. Yang Xiong (a Han dynasty thinker) poses a rhetorical question: the wealth of Jin and Chu (晋楚之富) represents material abundance, yet it cannot compare to upholding virtue; the nobility of Zhao Meng (赵孟之贵) signifies high status, yet it cannot match spiritual nobility. Ordinary people see only material things and miss the great Dao (道), so they remain perpetually insatiable.

(Note: "Concentrating the Qi to become supple" and "embracing the fullness of De" are cultivation methods from the Daode Jing; "riding the six dragons" comes from the Qian hexagram of the Yijing; Jin, Chu, and Zhao Meng are historical allusions representing figures of wealth and nobility.)

 皆有餘焉曾不知其在道曰餘食贅行蓋  道之所在以深爲根以約爲紀泰色淫志  於食爲餘於行爲贅是謂盜夸非道也哉 我獨若遺  徽宗註曰功蓋天下而似不自己  䟽義曰聖人以道貸天下𩐎萬物而不爲  義澤及萬世而不爲仁覆載天地刻雕衆  形而不爲巧未始有其功也莊子内篇論  明王之治有曰功蓋天下而似不自己以  謂遊於無有蓋無有者道之妙用聖人以  至無應天下之群有所以成帝王之功者  眞餘事爾豈認以爲功而固有之哉 我愚人之心也哉純純兮  徽宗註曰孔子曰吾與回言終日不違如  愚純純兮天機不張而默與道契兹謂大  智  䟽義曰君子盛德容貌若愚顔回之謂歟  觀其悟心齋之說進坐忘之妙聖人因其  深造默識則曰吾與回言終日不違如愚  所謂容貌若愚也且一性之眞湛然常存  寂寞無爲而天機不張虚靜恬淡而默與  道契則純白内備而朝徹見獨其爲智也  大矣荀子曰無冥冥之志者無昭昭之明  無惛惛之事者無赫赫之功此之謂歟然  則我愚人之心也哉純純兮豈眞愚哉去  小智而大智明故也 俗人昭昭我獨若昏俗人察察我獨悶悶  徽宗註曰同乎流俗則昭昭以爲明而其  明也小察察以爲智而其智也鑿遺物離  人而徽倪于一世之習則惛然若亡而存
Interpretation

This scripture discusses the distinction between Dao cultivators and worldly people. Those who have truly attained the Dao appear dull-witted yet embody great wisdom in seeming foolishness, while worldly people appear clever yet fundamentally deviate from the great Dao.

Dao cultivators (referring to realized sages) may have achievements that benefit the world, yet remain as if uninvolved. They nourish all things with the Dao without claiming benevolence, shape heaven and earth without boasting of skill. As Zhuangzi said: "When enlightened rulers govern the world, their accomplishments seem unrelated to themselves." This is because sages respond to all phenomena through "non-being" (the mysterious function of the Dao) - imperial achievements become mere byproducts rather than sources of pride.

Confucius once praised Yan Hui: "All day listening to my teachings without objection, like a simpleton." This exemplifies great wisdom appearing as foolishness. Yan Hui comprehended the profundity of "heart-fasting" (a Daoist mental purification practice) and "sitting-in-forgetfulness" (meditative state transcending physical form) - his apparent dullness actually reflected harmony with the Dao. Such pure innate nature, preserved in stillness and wuwei (non-action) while silently aligning with heavenly principles, constitutes true wisdom. As Xunzi remarked: "Without dedicated study there can be no brilliant achievement; without silent cultivation no glorious accomplishment."

Worldly people display cleverness outwardly, while cultivators seem dim-witted; worldly people nitpick over details, while cultivators embrace inclusiveness. This stems from cultivators transcending worldly habits - their apparent muddleheadedness actually preserves fundamental authenticity. This seemingly confused state precisely represents abandoning petty cleverness to attain great wisdom.

 悶然若鈍而利世俗豈得而窺之  䟽義曰葆光而不露是爲明之至行其所  無事是爲智之眞流俗之情蔽於蹇淺繕  性於俗而與之同則昭昭以爲明而其明  也小非所謂明之至察察以爲智而其智  也鑿非所謂智之眞體道者異乎是微妙  玄通深不可識遺物而不累於物離人而  不誘於人卓然自拔於流俗之中惛然若  亡而存如所謂湛兮似或存悶然若鈍而  利如所謂愈鈍而後利其迹泯其用藏深  妙眇冥不可測識世俗豈得而窺之孟子  曰君子之所爲衆人固不識也 澹兮其若海  徽宗註曰淵靜而性定道之全體  䟽義曰淵乎其居漻乎其清淵靜而性定  内保外不蕩澹兮其若海者道之全體也  道之體雖不可見即海水之大以觀之則  不以頃乆推移不以多少進退古人之大  體其實似之 飂兮似無所止  徽宗註曰變動而不居道之利用  䟽義曰動而愈出運量不匱變動而不居  不凝滯於物飂兮似無所止者道之利用  也道之用雖不可見即摇落之風以觀之  則動萬物而莫見其鼓舞之迹號萬竅而  莫測其披拂之功至無之妙用其實似之 衆人皆有以我獨頑且鄙  徽宗註曰桂可食故伐之漆可用故割之  人皆知有用之用而莫知無用之用衆人  皆有以是謂有用之用我獨頑且鄙是謂
Interpretation

This passage describes how the realm of those who have attained the Dao differs from ordinary people. The truly wise appear simple and dull, yet possess profound inner clarity—a state utterly incomprehensible to worldly minds.

Maintaining inner radiance without outward display represents the highest wisdom. Those who play at cleverness in mundane affairs may seem astute, but their understanding remains superficial. Those who truly embody the Dao possess unfathomable depth—they transcend material desires and remain unmoved by worldly temptations. Though appearing muddled, they exist with true substance; though seeming slow, their great skill appears as clumsiness. As Mencius observed, the actions of noble individuals remain beyond ordinary comprehension.

The Dao resembles the deep serenity of the ocean ("vast like the sea")—this is its fundamental nature. Though the Dao's essence remains invisible, we glimpse it through the sea's boundless expanse—unchanging through time, unaffected by water's ebb and flow. This was the realm of the Dao grasped by ancient sages.

The Dao also moves like the ceaseless wind ("howling yet seeming not to exist")—this is its marvelous function. Though the Dao's workings remain unseen, we perceive them through the wind's movement—stirring all things without visible form, passing through crevices without leaving traces. This formless efficacy perfectly manifests the Dao.

Worldly people chase after usefulness (like the cassia tree felled for its edible bark or the lacquer tree wounded for its sap), yet fail to comprehend the true value of uselessness. Those who attain the Dao may appear stubborn and foolish, but in truth they've realized the supreme wisdom of "the usefulness of uselessness."

 無用之用傳曰心不則德義之經爲頑古  者謂都爲美謂野爲鄙頑則不飾智鄙則  不見美神人以此不材  䟽義曰經世之道以無用之用爲至桂可  食故伐之漆可用故割之皆有用之用此  材之患者也人皆知自伐其智自矜其能  爲有用之用不知支離其德乃無用之用  焉衆人皆有以是爲有用之用以其材故  也我獨頑且鄙是爲無用之用以不材故  也頑與冥頑之頑同鄙與都鄙之鄙同頑  則不飾智言其無知鄙則不見美言其無  文神人以此爲不材而不材乃所以爲大  材也則無用之爲用明矣莊周於人間世  始言曲轅社又言商丘大木終言桂以可  食而伐漆以可用而割蓋明無用之用與  有用之用不同如此然則遊人間世而吉  凶與民同患可不知此 我獨異於人而貴求食于母  徽宗註曰嬰兒慕駒犢從惟道之求而已  夫道生之蓄之長之育之萬物資焉有母  之意惟道之求此所以異於人之失性於  俗  䟽義曰道行於萬物善貸且成覆育無外  可以爲天下母也凡有生之氣有形之狀  豈有須臾離道者哉楊雄著問道篇有曰  嬰兒慕駒犢從以明萬物唯道之求本於  性之自然而非或使也天道由虚靜中化  出萬有生之以遂其性蓄之以極其養長  之使就育之使充萬物皆往資焉而不匱
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the profound Daoist principle of "the usefulness of the useless." Ordinary people in the world constantly pursue seemingly useful talents, unaware that such "usefulness" can actually bring calamity.

Consider how the cassia tree is felled for its edible bark and the lacquer tree wounded for its useful sap—these are the harms brought by being "useful." People often flaunt their cleverness and chase superficial talents, not realizing that maintaining a state of plain simplicity constitutes true "great usefulness." While ordinary people pursue obvious abilities, I maintain a seemingly foolish and unadorned appearance—appearing "useless," yet this is in fact the greatest talent.

The text employs the terms "stubborn" (愚钝) and "coarse" (粗俗) to describe this state: stubbornness prevents clever posturing, and coarseness avoids chasing superficial elegance. Those who attain the Dao (道) achieve genuine "great material" precisely through this state of "being unremarkable." Zhuangzi illustrates this in the "Human World" chapter with examples like the sacred altar tree and giant timber, showing how seemingly useless things endure longest.

The passage then presents the metaphor of "seeking nourishment from the mother." Just as an infant clings to its mother, all things naturally depend on the nurturing of the Dao (道). The Dao gives birth and nourishes all beings like a mother rearing her children—nothing exists apart from the Dao's sustenance. As Yang Xiong noted in his "Inquiry into the Dao," all creatures' reliance on the Dao mirrors an infant's natural attachment to its mother.

The Dao of Heaven (天道) generates all things from emptiness and stillness, allowing each to follow its nature while providing abundant nourishment for growth and fulfillment. All things depend on the Dao of Heaven without ever experiencing lack—this is the significance of the Dao as the mother of all under heaven.

 何異嬰犢之母懷乎蓋萬物由道以生出  故道爲母而物爲子經曰有名萬物之母  又曰天下有始以爲天下母則道有母之  意可見矣世之人非惟不得其母又不能  守之捨眞逐妄道將愈遠古人所以有揭  竿求諸海之諭也若夫唯道之求者蓋亦  異於人之失性於俗者歟    孔德之容章第二十一 孔德之容惟道是從  徽宗註曰一陰一陽之謂道物得以生謂  之德道常無名豈可形容所以神其德德  有方體同焉皆得所以顯道性脩反德德  至同於初故惟道是從  䟽義曰立天之道曰陰與陽一陰一陽所  以爲道生而不有是謂玄德物得以生所  以爲德道隱無名無體可見則非形容之  所及德有定體有生皆全故爲人之所同  得然德兼於道則道者所以微德之顯故  無名之道所以神其德道散爲德則德者  所以闡道之幽故有體之德所以顯其道  能性脩反德復乎一之所起德至同於初  復乎泰初之無名則德冥於道此所以惟  道是從也 道之爲物惟恍惟惚  徽宗註曰道體至無而用廼妙有所以爲  物然物無非道恍者有象之可恍惚者有  數之可推而所謂有者疑於無也故曰道  之爲物  䟽義曰道有體有用語道之體未始有物  兹謂至無語道之用應而不窮兹謂妙有  至無顯爲妙有此所以爲物妙有出於至
Interpretation

This scripture primarily elucidates the relationship between the Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue/Power), as well as the essential characteristics of the Dao.

First, it describes the Dao as being like a mother who nurtures all things. All beings originate from the Dao, making the Dao the mother and all things her children. Yet ordinary people not only fail to recognize this "mother" but also abandon what is genuine in pursuit of illusions, drifting further away from the Dao. Only those who wholeheartedly seek the Dao differ from worldly individuals who have lost their original nature.

Chapter 21 states that "great De manifests entirely in accordance with the patterns of the Dao." Here, the relationship between the Dao and De is explained: the alternating movement of Yin-Yang constitutes the Dao, while all things coming into existence by attaining the Dao constitutes De. The Dao itself has no name or form and cannot be concretely described, yet it enables De to appear wondrous. De has tangible manifestations that everyone can attain. By cultivating one's nature to return to De, one ultimately merges with the primordial Dao. Thus, great De fully follows the patterns of the Dao.

Regarding the state of the Dao's existence: in essence, the Dao is absolute emptiness (Wu); in function, it produces marvelous transformations. Though it may seem to have perceptible forms and discernible patterns, this "presence" is simultaneously close to "absence." This is the unique characteristic of the Dao as an existent—its substance is emptiness, yet its function is mysteriously real. The empty substance manifests as wondrous function, and the wondrous function originates from the empty substance.

(Note: The term "Huizong" refers to Emperor Huizong of Song, Zhao Ji, who personally annotated the Daode Jing; "Xuande" denotes profound and mysterious virtue; "Taichu" refers to the primordial state of the cosmos.)

 無故物無非道道之爲物恍惚是見恍未  有狀特心可況故爲有象之可見忽爲數  始數由此滋故爲有數之可推恍之與惚  若有若無謂之有而疑於無也道之爲物  其幾是歟 惚兮恍兮中有象焉恍兮惚兮中有物兮  徽宗註曰見乃謂之象形乃謂之物惚恍  之中象物斯具猶如大空變爲雷風猶如  大塊化爲水火以成變化以行鬼神是謂  道妙  䟽義曰物生然後有象則象者吉之先見  故見乃謂之象四時散精爲物則物者囿  於有形故形乃謂之物物象之具出於恍  惚之中猶如風薄千山雷震乎天變於大  空水之潤下火之炎上化於大塊所以成  變化故昆蟲出入草木死生莫不待此以  成所以行鬼神故自有形至於無形自有  心至於無心莫不待此以行道之妙即此  可見 窈兮冥兮中有精兮  徽宗註曰窈者幽之極冥者明之藏窈冥  之中至陰之原而天一所兆精實生焉  䟽義曰幽在穴而難見爲窈故窈爲幽之  極日藏六而爲冥故冥爲明之藏大明之  上名爲至陽之原則窈冥之中是爲至陰  之原至陰之所於方爲北天一生水於北  在人爲精窈冥之中所以爲有精也 其精甚眞其中有信自古及今其名不去  徽宗註曰精者天德之至正而不妄故曰  甚眞一而不變故云有信且然無間故其  名不去
Interpretation

This passage describes the seemingly existent yet non-existent nature of the Dao (the cosmic origin). The Dao appears indistinct and hazy—while it seems to exist, it has no concrete form; yet though it seems non-existent, traces of it can still be perceived. Just as thunder and wind suddenly arise in the sky, or as water and fire naturally emerge from the earth, all these transformations are wondrous manifestations of the Dao.

Before all things come into being, there are first signs (xiang), such as the changing seasons that herald the growth of all life. Concrete things (wu), on the other hand, possess fixed forms. Both these signs and things emerge from that indistinct, nebulous state. The wind blowing over mountains, thunder resounding across the heavens, water flowing downward, fire rising upward, the movement of insects and the withering and flourishing of plants—even the transformations from the tangible to the intangible, from the mindful to the mindless—all are expressions of the Dao in motion.

The darkest and most profound depths (yaoming) contain the purest essence of Qi (vital energy). The unfathomable depths of a cave are called yao, while places untouched by sunlight are called ming. In the extreme Yin region (the north, associated with water in Daoist cosmology), the celestial principle gives rise to water, which manifests in the human body as Jing (essence). This essence is utterly real (shen zhen) and unchanging (you xin), its fundamental nature remaining constant from ancient times to the present (qi ming bu qu). Just as the movement of heaven follows an infallible, perfectly correct principle (tian de zhi zhi zheng), the existence of this essence is absolutely certain.

 䟽義曰精者一之所生而天得一以清故  精爲天德之至乾之七德而言純粹精則  精爲天德可知止乎至一盡性而無僞是  謂正而不妄玆非至眞乎得一以生未形  者有分是謂一而不變兹非有信乎若然  者萬物終始莫匪且然而一之精通未始  有間此名之所以不去 以閲衆甫吾何以知衆甫之然哉以此  徽宗註曰衆甫之變日逝而不停甚精之  眞常存而不去聖人貴精故能閲衆甫之  變而知其所以然無思也而寂然無爲也  而不動然感而遂通天下之故則思爲之  端起而功業之迹著非天下之至精其孰  能與于此  䟽義曰神奇化爲臭腐臭腐化爲神奇衆  甫之變所以日逝而不停一之精通合于  天倫甚精之眞所以常存而不去聖人貴  精則得夫自古及今其名不去之道矣其  於消息盈虚終則有始且有以語大義之  方論萬物之理故能閲衆甫之變不知所  以然而然也夫聖人以此洗心則常無思  而寂然退藏於密則常無爲而不動然感  而遂通天下之故昔之無思者不得不思  昔之無爲者不得不爲思出於無思爲出  於無爲則高大之功富有之業其迹著矣  非天下之至精孰能與此是篇先言至精  之德終言知衆甫之然者謂是故也    曲則全章第二十二 曲則全  徽宗註曰與物委蛇而同其波故全其形
Interpretation

This scripture expounds the significance of "Jing" (essence) in Daoist philosophy. "Jing" originates from the "One" (the primordial state of the Dao), and heaven maintains its clarity by attaining this "One." Thus, "Jing" represents heaven's supreme De (virtue/power), as pure as the seven virtues of the Qian hexagram in the Yijing. When "Jing" reaches its utmost purity, it becomes the genuine and unwavering "Ultimate One," where one's true nature is fully revealed without falsity—this is called "upright and free from delusion," the most authentic state.

Before all things take form, they already contain the differentiation of the "One." This state is termed "One without change," signifying truth and reliability. Therefore, the beginning and end of all things are inseparable from this principle. The subtlety of the "One" permeates everything without interruption, which is why the "name" (designation of the Dao) never vanishes. By contemplating this principle, one can comprehend the root of all transformations.

Emperor Huizong of Song remarked in his commentary: Though the transformations of all things flow ceaselessly day by day, the truth of "Jing" endures eternally. Sages value the profundity of "Jing," enabling them to discern the patterns of change in all things and understand their underlying principles. They appear thoughtless yet comprehend deeply, seemingly inactive yet resonate with all under heaven. When necessity arises, they naturally engage in thought and establish achievements. Who but those who grasp the most subtle principles of the universe could attain such a state?

The miraculous may decay, and decay may transform into the miraculous—the changes of all things never cease. Yet the subtlety of the "One" aligns with the Dao of heaven, ensuring the constancy of truth. Sages who cherish this "Jing" master the "Dao" that never fades from antiquity to the present. They understand the cycles of prosperity and decline, knowing that after an end comes a new beginning, and thus can elucidate the principles of all things and perceive the essence of transformation.

Sages use this principle to purify their minds, maintaining a state of thoughtless tranquility. In retreat, they remain hidden and often abide in Wuwei (non-action). But when they sense the needs of the world, their former "thoughtlessness" turns to thought, and their former "non-action" becomes action. Such thought arises from no-thought, and action emerges from non-action—thus, their monumental achievements naturally shine forth. Who but those who grasp the most subtle principles of the universe could reach such heights?

Finally, the text mentions the principle that "to bend is to be whole": by yielding to external changes and flowing with them, one preserves oneself. Just as bending ensures wholeness, this embodies a crucial Daoist wisdom for navigating life.

 生而不虧莊子曰外曲者與人爲徒  䟽義曰和其光而不耀同其塵而不異大  同於物與之宛轉宜若曲也然後其身而  身先外其身而身存致曲如此乃所以全  其形生而不虧也莊子以與物委蛇而同  其波爲衛生之經又曰外曲者與人爲徒  惟外曲則不拂人之情兹非曲則全歟 枉則直  徽宗註曰遺佚而不怨阨窮而不憫故内  直而不失其正易曰尺蠖之屈以求信也  䟽義曰遺之使佚宜怨而不怨阨之使窮  宜憫而不憫宜若枉也然直而不律者乃  所以全其直以訐爲直者適所以傷其義  其枉如此是所謂直其正也易曰尺蠖之  屈以求信也蓋屈則所以求其信兹非枉  則直歟 窪則盈  徽宗註曰無藏也故有餘  䟽義曰藏山於澤藏舟於壑而忽已遁藏  禾於囷藏水於皿而易已竭惟在我者能  運而無積然後用之霈然而有餘莊子所  謂無藏也故有餘者此也即萬物之理以  明之窪則盈蓋可知已 弊則新  徽宗註曰冬閉之不固則春生之不茂  䟽義曰能歸根斯可以冀其芸芸有肅殺  斯可以冀其敷榮惟歛藏於冬者旣固然  後蕃鮮於春者必茂即四時之運以明之  弊則新蓋可知已 少則得多則惑  徽宗註曰道要不煩聞見之多不如其約  也以支爲㫖則終身不解兹謂大惑  䟽義曰道一而已矣故其要不煩多聞守
Interpretation

Zhuangzi observed that those with a harmonious exterior find it easier to get along with others. The deeper meaning here is: they dim their brilliance without being glaring, blend into the mundane world without losing their true nature. Though appearing to go with the flow, they actually advance by retreating. By placing themselves behind, they end up ahead; by not striving to preserve themselves, they endure. This outward compliance is precisely the method for preserving the wholeness of life.

Zhuangzi believed that yielding to the transformations of external things, like riding the undulations of water, is the key to nurturing life. The saying "those who bend outwardly walk with others" means that precisely because of their harmonious exterior, they do not violate human conventions—is this not the principle of "bending leads to wholeness"? What appears curved is in fact upright.

Emperor Huizong of Song commented: When abandoned, they bear no resentment; when in hardship, they feel no sorrow—their inner core remains steadfast. Like the inchworm in the Book of Changes that contracts its body to stretch forward more effectively. The explanation here: Though abandonment should provoke resentment, they feel none; though suffering should bring sorrow, they remain untroubled. Outwardly yielding, they maintain integrity without rigidity. Those who attack others to flaunt their righteousness, by contrast, end up harming the Dao (the Way). This outward yielding with inner integrity, like the inchworm's contraction enabling its extension, is none other than the principle of "the crooked becomes straight."

Only low-lying places can hold water. Emperor Huizong said, "By not hoarding, one finds abundance." The meaning: Hide a mountain in a marsh, or a boat in a valley, and they easily vanish; store grain in granaries or water in vessels, and they quickly deplete. Only by not deliberately hoarding, by letting the ten thousand things flow naturally, can one draw from an endless supply. This is the principle Zhuangzi called "having abundance precisely because one does not store." Viewed through the lens of nature's cycles, the truth of "the hollow becomes full" becomes clear.

The withering of the old allows for the birth of the new. Emperor Huizong remarked: If winter does not properly store vitality, spring cannot flourish. The explanation here: Only by returning to the root can new growth be expected; only through austerity can luxuriance emerge. The more fully winter withdraws, the more vigorously spring surges. Observing the rhythm of the seasons, the principle of "decay leads to renewal" becomes evident.

Seeking less brings attainment; craving more brings confusion. Emperor Huizong said: The essence of the Dao (the Way) lies in simplicity—broad learning is inferior to grasping the essentials. Taking branches for the root means never attaining understanding; this is the greatest delusion. The explanation here: The Dao is singular, so its essence is not complex. Rather than pursuing extensive knowledge, hold fast to simplicity.

 之以約多見守之以卓惟聞見之多而能  反說約然後有得於道若乃辨者之囿以  支爲㫖則多言數窮未免乎累大惑者終  身不解斯人之謂歟莊子曰夫道不欲雜  亦是意也 是以聖人抱一爲天下式  徽宗註曰其爲物不二則其生物不測惟  天下之至精能爲天下之至神聖人抱一  以守不摇其精故言而爲天下道動而爲  天下則  䟽義曰惟天下之至誠爲能盡物之性能  盡物之性則可以贊天地之化育與天地  參矣其爲物不二所謂誠也其生物不測  所謂贊天地之化育也惟一能存精惟精  能集神一者何也誠幾是已一之精通神  固自全有精而後神從之也惟天下之至  精能爲天下之至神抱一而已聖人盡此  矣一而不變者能守而勿失則甚眞之精  内保而不蕩若然則精神四達並流上際  下蟠化育萬物不可爲象不得已而言言  則成文而天下共由不得已而動動則成  德而天下是傚也記所謂言而世爲天下  道行而世爲天下則其爲天下式者乎 不自見故明  徽宗註曰不蔽于一己之見則無所不燭  故明  䟽義曰明四目達四聰廣視聽而無所蔽  塞故能旁燭無疆而知人情實也不蔽於  一己之見者所以能無所不燭而爲明 不自是故彰  徽宗註曰不私于一己之是而惟是之從  則功大名顯而天下服故彰
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the necessity of singular focus in cultivating the Dao (the Way), as well as the way of being for sages.

Regarding single-minded cultivation: If a Dao cultivator acquires extensive knowledge but fails to grasp its essential core ("returning from complexity to simplicity"), they will resemble those fond of debate—troubled by trivial matters and never comprehending the great Dao (the Way) in their lifetime. This is what Zhuangzi meant by saying "the Dao does not tolerate mixture." Sages hold fast to "the One" (the fundamental principle of the Dao) as the standard for all under heaven. When heaven and earth create the myriad things, they too adhere to this singular, undivided principle ("creating things without duality"), hence their mysterious generative power. Only the most refined and concentrated state can reach the highest spiritual attainment ("utmost refinement leads to utmost spirituality"). By maintaining this singular focus, the sage's spirit (Shen) can penetrate all directions and nurture all beings.

Concerning the sage's way of being in the world: Sages don't stubbornly cling to personal views, thus achieving perfect clarity of perception; they don't proclaim their own correctness, yet their virtue (De) naturally manifests. Like ancient sage-kings who "opened the four eyes and extended the four ears" to remain unobstructed by personal biases, they could perceive all things clearly. By not being limited by individual perspectives ("not obscured by personal views"), they illuminate truth completely; by not insisting on personal correctness ("not partial to personal truths"), their achievements naturally become illustrious, and the world naturally follows them.

The mentioned "embracing the One" (baoyi) is a crucial Daoist practice referring to focusing on the Dao's fundamental principle; "utmost refinement" (zhijing) and "utmost spirituality" (zhishen) denote different levels of cultivation attainment; "assisting heaven and earth in transformation and nurture" describes the profound state where cultivators participate in the mysterious creative process of the cosmos.

 䟽義曰稽于衆舍己從人不自用而嘉言  是聽故有赫赫之功而萬邦咸寧也不私  於一己之是而惟是之從者所以能功大  名顯使天下服而能彰 不自伐故有功  徽宗註曰書曰汝惟不伐天下莫與汝爭  功  䟽義曰經曰自伐者無功書曰有其善喪  厥善能不伐其功故人不爭而其功不去  舜之命禹曰汝惟不伐天下莫與汝爭功  其此之謂歟 不自矜故長  徽宗註曰書曰汝惟不矜天下莫與汝爭  能  䟽義曰經曰自矜者不長書曰矜其能喪  厥功惟不矜其能故人不爭而百姓與能  舜之命禹曰汝惟不矜天下莫與汝爭能  其此之謂歟 夫惟不爭故天下莫能與之爭  徽宗註曰人皆取先己獨處後曰受天下  之垢若是者常處于不爭之地孰能與之  爭乎  䟽義曰衆人尚力不尚德而求勝人故人  皆取先聖人不敢爲天下先而道後其身  故己獨處後己獨處後則知白而守黑知  榮而守辱榮辱一視不以自好累其心是  謂受天下之垢若然則以濡弱謙下爲表  以空虚不毁萬物爲實處乎不爭之地積  衆小不勝爲大勝也常處不爭之地物敦  能與之爭乎 古之所謂曲則全者豈虚言哉誠全而歸之  徽宗註曰聖人其動若水以交物而不虧  其全其應若繩以順理而不失其直知窪  之爲盈無亢滿之累知弊之爲新無夸耀
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist wisdom of "non-contention" (bu zheng), whose core principle is that humility and yielding can ultimately achieve great things.

By refraining from self-praise, one can truly establish merit. As the Book of Documents states: "If you do not boast of your achievements, no one in the world will contend with you for them." Those who flaunt their accomplishments end up losing them, while those who do not claim credit find that no one disputes their contributions. Emperor Shun similarly advised Yu the Great with these words.

Only by avoiding self-importance can one endure. The classics warn that arrogance makes longevity difficult, and the Book of Documents records that pride leads to the loss of merit. Only those who do not flaunt their abilities earn the genuine support of the people. Emperor Shun's teaching to Yu—"If you do not boast of your talents, no one in the world can rival you"—expresses this same truth.

Precisely because the sage does not contend with others, no one in the world can contend with him. While the masses rush ahead in competition, the sage willingly takes the rear, enduring the world's humiliations. This attitude resembles knowing brightness yet abiding in darkness, understanding glory yet accepting disgrace—remaining indifferent to praise and blame, never allowing personal preferences to disturb the mind.

Outwardly appearing soft and humble, inwardly maintaining an open and receptive mind, the sage occupies the position of non-contention. Seemingly yielding at every turn, he accumulates small victories into great ones. By constantly dwelling in non-contention, who could possibly contend with him? As the ancients said, "To bend is to be whole"—this is no empty saying, for those who truly embody it indeed preserve themselves.

The sage's actions flow like water, conforming to all things without harming their integrity; his responses follow the plumb line, adhering to principle without losing rectitude. Knowing that low places will inevitably fill, he bears no burden of pride; understanding that decay gives way to renewal, he avoids the flaw of ostentation.

 之迹若性之自爲而不知爲之者致曲而  已故全而歸之可以保身可以盡年而不  知其盡也是謂全德之人豈虚言哉  䟽義曰水之爲物因器方圓物莫能爭聖  人動出如此故能與物委虵而全其形生  所謂其動若水以交物而不虧其全也繩  之爲物集系爲之其理常直聖人應物如  此故能順物之枉而直在其中所謂其應  若繩以順理而不失其直也知窪之爲盈  則大盈若冲卑以自牧矣何亢滿之累知  弊之爲新則和光同塵未嘗自矜矣何夸  耀之迹凡此非知曲枉窪弊之利强勉以  行之也若性之自爲而不知其由然虚己  以應不與物迕以致其曲而已故全而歸  之則可以保身而無危疑之憂可以盡年  而無短折之患與天地相爲長乆而不知  其盡也若是者可名爲全德之人豈虚言  哉誠全而歸之    希言自然章第二十三 希言自然  徽宗註曰希者獨立于萬物之上而不與  物對列子所謂疑獨者是也去智與故循  天之理而不從事於外故言自然  䟽義曰道經曰聽之不聞名曰希德經曰  大音希聲希者概而有間非聽所聞所謂  獨立乎萬物之上而不與物對者也列子  言不生者疑獨蓋不生者能生生不生則  疑於獨立物莫能偶所謂疑獨其希之謂  歟是以黜其聰明而去智與故與天合德
Interpretation

The nature of water is to conform to the shape of its container without resistance. The way of the sage (one who has attained the Dao) follows this same principle—adapting to external circumstances while preserving one's essential life, merging seamlessly with all things like flowing water yet never losing its own integrity.

Consider a rope, woven from many strands yet fundamentally straight in nature. The sage interacts with the world similarly, bending with circumstances while maintaining inner uprightness, just as following the rope's twists never compromises its inherent straightness.

Understanding that low places will naturally fill teaches that true fullness appears empty. By humbly cultivating oneself, arrogance and complacency find no foothold. Recognizing that decay gives way to renewal allows one to conceal brilliance and blend with the mundane, never boasting and thus leaving no trace of ostentation. These are not forced achievements but emerge effortlessly, like the spontaneous expression of one's true nature.

Responding to all things with an open, valley-like mind—without conflict, simply following the natural contours of existence—ultimately leads to complete return to one's original essence. In this way, the body is preserved from harm, life reaches its natural span without premature demise, and one endures as enduringly as heaven and earth, without perceiving any end. Such a person may be called one of perfect Virtue (De), and this is no empty claim.

Regarding the chapter on "Rare words are natural" (Xiyan ziran): "Xi" refers to a state of transcendent independence above all things, not opposing any particular phenomenon. The Liezi's concept of "doubtful solitude" (yidu) expresses this same idea. Abandoning cleverness and artificial striving, following the natural order without forcing external manifestations—this is what is meant by "natural."

The Dao De Jing says the sound that cannot be heard is called "Xi," while the De Jing states the greatest sound is inaudible. "Xi" describes an elusive, barely perceptible state—this is the condition of transcendent independence that stands beyond all relative phenomena. When the Liezi speaks of "the ungenerated being in doubtful solitude," it means the source that generates all things is itself uncreated, thus appearing uniquely solitary. This is the meaning of "Xi." Therefore, only by discarding cleverness and artificiality can one align with the natural Dao.

 而循天之理巍然處其所不從事於外固  非或使之所能爲也故言自然 故飄風不終朝驟雨不終曰孰爲此者天地 天地尚不能乆而况於人乎  徽宗註曰天地之造萬物風以散之委衆  形之自化而雨以潤之任萬物之自滋故  不益生不勸成而萬物自遂于天地之間  所以長且乆也飄驟則陰陽有繆戾之患  必或使之而物被其害故不能久  䟽義曰天施地生百昌並植然撓萬物者  莫疾乎風潤萬物者莫潤乎水故風以鼓  舞衆形委其自化而物得條達雨以潤澤  萬物任其自滋而物得茂大常因自然非  益生也不爲助長非勸成也故生化形色  遂于兩間此所以爲長乆之道若乃風疾  轉而爲飄而雨暴聚而爲驟此非陰陽之  和乃繆戾之患其於物也益生勸成非因  自然物反蒙其害矣其能乆乎 故從事於道者道者同於道德者同於德失 者同於失同於道者道亦得之同於德者德 亦得之同於失者失亦得之  徽宗註曰希則無所從事無聲之表獨以  性覺與道爲一而不與物共豈德之可名  失之可累哉惟不知獨化之自然而以道  爲難知爲難行疑若登天然似不可及也  廼始苦心勞形而從事於道或倚于一偏  或蔽于一曲道術爲天下裂道者同於道  德者同於德失者同於失而不自得其得  則其得之也適所以爲失歟
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the core Daoist concept of "natural non-action" (Wuwei). The operations of heaven and earth follow their inherent patterns, and the growth of all things requires no artificial interference. Fierce winds never blow all day, nor do torrential rains last an entire day—these are manifestations of disrupted Yin-Yang balance in heaven and earth, and cannot endure. As Emperor Huizong's commentary notes, while heaven and earth nurture all beings—with winds responsible for stirring and rains for moistening—they always allow things to grow naturally, never deliberately assisting or hastening them. Forced intervention would disrupt natural equilibrium and cause harm.

The text further explains that wind and water are originally natural forces nourishing all things, yet when transformed into storms and downpours, they violate the principle of Yin-Yang harmony, becoming calamities. The truly enduring way lies in following nature's course—neither artificially accelerating growth nor forcibly achieving outcomes. Those who pursue the Dao (the Way) must merge with it; those cultivating Virtue (De) must walk its path; those who lose their way will remain companions of confusion. Emperor Huizong's commentary particularly emphasizes that the highest state is reaching the soundless, formless "Xi" (the supreme state of Dao), achieving complete unity with the Way. Ironically, those who aggressively pursue the Dao may become fixated on partial aspects, fragmenting its wholeness—what appears as attainment is actually the loss of true essence.

The entire passage underscores that the optimal state allows all things to develop naturally without human coercion. Like tending plants—moderate watering lets them thrive best, while excessive care backfires—so too in human affairs: aligning with natural principles is the enduring path.

 䟽義曰獨立于萬物之上不從事於外者  希也能不用聰明默而識之於無聲之中  獨能聞和則與道冥會而物莫能偶矣道  至於此無損無益何得可名何失可累昧  者不能朝徹而見獨故不知獨化之自然  道本易知而天下莫能知於是以道爲難  知矣道本易行而天下莫能行於是以道  爲難行矣或求道於高遠若登天而不可  及曾不知每下愈况而不拘於高也則雖  心有所係以苦其思能有所技以勞其形  而從事於道其何所得乎以此從事則在  道爲一偏在物爲一曲道之大全於是裂  矣夫人生均有獨化不因物而得失性者  從事於道則吾所謂獨立於萬物之上者  復臣於道矣雖於道德失之三等而有所  得然非自得其得也同歸於失而已矣 信不足有不信  徽宗註曰信則不妄妄見眞僞以道爲眞  以物爲僞則於信爲不足故有不信惠施  韓非之徒皆原於道而失之也遠信不足  故也  䟽義曰經曰信者吾信之不信者吾亦信  之得信也萬物雖殊無非實者視不信猶  信乃眞信也惟知道不違物而不以道爲  眞知物無非道而不以物爲僞故無往而  不信矣若夫信不足者生乎妄見以道爲  眞以物爲僞不知大全自生分别爾故信  不足者有不信也若惠施之好辯韓非之  刑名不知以眞冥妄眞妄一眞而去道遠
Interpretation

This commentary elucidates the state of transcendent independence that Dao cultivators should embody. Those who truly comprehend the Dao (the Way) can remain inwardly serene (the "Xi" refers to the empty stillness of Dao's essence) without relying on external things, neither displaying contrived wisdom nor forced knowledge, yet naturally perceiving the great Dao in silent communion. When one attains unity with the Dao, no phenomenon can disturb them—the Dao neither increases nor decreases, transcends verbal description, and remains unburdened by worldly affairs.

Yet the ignorant fail to realize this self-so (ziran) Dao of independent transformation during the clear morning meditation state ("Zhaoche" signifies the cultivated clarity of dawn-like awareness). Paradoxically, the Dao is fundamentally easy to understand, yet people consider it incomprehensible; inherently simple to practice, yet deemed difficult to follow. Some seek the Dao in lofty, distant realms as if attempting to climb heaven itself, unaware that the Dao becomes more evident in humble places ("the lower you go, the clearer it appears"—a Zhuangzi典故 illustrating Dao's manifestation in lowly things). When minds cling to externals and exhaust the body through artificial techniques in Dao pursuit, they ironically deviate further. Such partial cultivation fractures the integral Dao into fragments.

All humans inherently possess this self-so nature of independent transformation, unaltered by external conditions. True Dao cultivators preserve this transcendent autonomy. If one becomes constrained by the Dao during practice—though appearing to gain—it constitutes genuine loss. Consider historical figures like Hui Shi (Logician school) and Han Fei (Legalist school): though their philosophies originated from Daoist roots, lacking authentic realization ("insufficient faith") ultimately estranged them from the Dao.

Genuine sincerity ("Xin") transcends true/false dichotomies. Dao practitioners understand the Dao neither separates from phenomena nor dismisses them as illusory. Fixation on distinguishing the Dao's "truth" from worldly "falsehood" breeds prejudice. As the scripture states: "To the sincere I respond with sincerity; to the insincere I likewise respond with sincerity"—this embodies true faith. Though phenomena differ infinitely, all are authentically existent. Hui Shi's obsession with debate and Han Fei's fixation on penal codes stemmed from failing to perceive truth and illusion's fundamental unity, thus drifting ever farther from the Dao.

 者凡以信不足爾 道德眞經䟽義
Interpretation

This passage comes from Volume 5 of Daode Zhenjing Shuyi (Commentary on the Authentic Scripture of Dao and De), conveying that the root cause of various problems in the world lies in people's lack of sincerity. The phrase "凡以信不足尔" can be directly translated as "all because of insufficient sincerity."

Here, the text highlights the importance of "sincerity" (信) in Laozi's philosophy. In Daoist practice, "sincerity" not only refers to honesty and trustworthiness but also encompasses devout faith in the Dao (the fundamental principle of the universe). The author points out that social conflicts, personal troubles, and other phenomena ultimately stem from people straying from their innate, genuine nature.

Daode Zhenjing Shuyi is a commentary on the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue) by the Song Dynasty Daoist scholar Jiang Cheng, regarded as an important Daoist scripture. The work elucidates the essential principles of spiritual cultivation embedded in Laozi's original text through chapter-by-chapter explanations. Volume 5 primarily discusses how to approach the Dao through the cultivation of virtue.

卷之五

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0079); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 4 Vol. 6 →