中文 · EN

《道德真經藏室纂微篇》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 3 / 10 7,263 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經藏室纂微篇》 Vol. 3 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 14 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經藏室纂微篇》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

道德眞經藏室纂微篇卷之三欲三    碧虚子陳景元纂  道經 古之善爲士者微妙玄通深不可識  言上古善以自然之道治身治國而爲士  者其德用婣微神明遠妙智照望冥精誠  通達是以體貌深厚孰能知識老哉故道  大似乎不肖列子居鄭而人莫識此乃古  之善爲士者也 夫唯不可識故强爲之容  有道之士德量深遠難可知識恐後世無  以爲師法故强爲說其容狀指陳表儀謂  下文也 豫若冬涉川  豫猶豫也言有道之士順從自然弗逆萬  物不爲福先不爲禍始然而舉事退藏輒  加重慎雖履坦途常憂没溺有如寒沍之  月揭涉長川其心豫然而疑難恐沈於不  測之淵也 猶若畏四鄰  有道之士常履虚無而不敢有爲故出處  而深思猶然而畏慎謹於去就而慮幽明  之司察有如世人避禁而畏四鄰之竊知  此戒之深也 儼若客  有道之士儼然端謹心無散亂如賔對主  人曷敢造次言無事無爲也如東郭順子  正容悟物使人意消故田子方師仰之李  舍光居于暗室如對君父故司馬子微激  賞之此可謂能儼若客也 涣若冰將釋  有道之士外雖矜莊内心閑放其智智如  春冰之釋涣然泮散凝滯都亡 敦兮其若樸  敦者淳厚貌樸者質素貌又形未分曰樸  言有道之士天資淳厚質素未分語默恬
Interpretation

The ancient masters who truly understood the cultivation of Dao (the Way) attained a state so subtle, profound, and far-reaching that ordinary people could scarcely comprehend it. These individuals used the natural Dao to cultivate their bodies and minds, and to govern states. Their De (Virtue/Power) operated in ways too mysterious to fathom, their wisdom illuminated the deepest mysteries, and their Shen (spirit) communed with the Great Dao. Thus, their inner cultivation was so profound—how could ordinary people fully grasp it? As Laozi said, "The Great Dao always appears insignificant." Liezi lived in the state of Zheng, yet no one recognized his true attainment—this was the nature of genuine Daoist practitioners in antiquity.

Because the state of these cultivators is difficult to describe, we must reluctantly resort to metaphors to approximate their condition:

They moved with the caution of someone crossing a river on thin ice in winter. Dao cultivators follow nature, neither deliberately seeking blessings nor courting disaster, yet they act with extraordinary care. Like someone facing the unfathomable depths of a river in the dead of winter, their hearts are filled with hesitation and vigilance, fearing a misstep into the abyss.

They interacted with others as though wary of being observed by neighbors. Cultivators maintained a state of stillness and Wuwei (non-action), carefully considering every advance or retreat, as cautiously as ordinary people fear breaking taboos and being discovered by those nearby.

They carried themselves with the solemnity of a guest. Practitioners held themselves with dignified bearing, their minds focused, like a guest who dares not act carelessly before a host. Just as Dongguo Shunzi's upright demeanor could transform others, inspiring Tian Zifang to become his disciple, or as Li Sheguang remained as reverent in solitude as if standing before a ruler—earning the admiration of Sima Zicheng.

Their inner clarity was like spring ice on the verge of melting. Though outwardly composed, Dao cultivators were inwardly free and unconstrained, all attachments dissolving as naturally as ice in spring.

They were as simple and unadorned as uncarved wood. Practitioners preserved their innate purity, remaining in their original, authentic state—their words and actions naturally serene and uncontrived.

 和無文飾也 曠兮其若谷  曠者寬大之稱谷者含虚之竅言有道之  士德淳厚而不顧器寬大而含容任善惡  之去來如空谷之應答而常虚也 渾兮其若濁  雜波流曰渾不分明曰濁言有道之士内  心清靜外雜波流若濁水之不明曷分别  乎妍醜已上七事治國則民不識不知復  乎太古修身則和光同塵冥乎至道 孰能濁以澄靜之徐清  言有道之士心同婣泉即其濁以澄靜之  則徐復其清矣 孰能安以乆動之徐生  言有道之士支離其德當其安以乆而動  之則徐全其生矣舊說云至人外示混濁  不異凡流内本澄清同乎道體徐徐而登  假于清眞也復爲學人恐安此徐清之道  乆而不遷住於諸境故勉之令動别求勝  法逮及徐徐漸生不住諸相以至生生不  絶也一本作孰能濁以靜之而徐清孰能  安以動之而徐生 保此道者不欲盈夫唯不盈故能弊不新成  言人保守此徐清徐生之道者善能謙以  自牧安其虚靜夫唯不盈者再舉獨有至  人不矜恃盈滿故能常守弊陋雖有新成  之功而能持勝不動更求進嚮復增上善  不住小成斯乃聖人之深趣也(善士師古/識量深微)  (敦樸空曠得幽谷虚極/之道故次之以致虚極) 致虚極守靜篤  致得也言人能心無愛欲得沖虚之道參
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the spiritual states and cultivation methods of Daoist practitioners. Those who have attained the Dao (Daoshi) maintain a heart of pristine simplicity, unadorned and natural, with a mind as expansive as an empty valley that embraces all things—both good and evil—while remaining as tranquil as an echo in a hollow gorge. Outwardly, they appear turbid and indistinct, like muddy waters that make no distinction between beauty and ugliness, yet inwardly they preserve perfect clarity.

The text presents two essential cultivation techniques: first, how to gradually restore clarity through stillness amid turbidity, and second, how to gradually awaken vitality through sustained practice while abiding in tranquility. True adepts who have realized the Dao may seem no different from ordinary people in appearance, yet within they have united with the Dao, attaining a state of purity and authenticity through gradual refinement. Practitioners must avoid stagnation, continually transcending their current state to pursue higher levels of realization.

The key to maintaining this path lies in not pursuing perfection. Precisely because they do not seek completion, they preserve their original simplicity. Even when achieving success, they remain free from complacency and persist in diligent progress. This embodies the profound wisdom of sages.

Finally, the text speaks of "reaching the extremity of emptiness and guarding profound stillness" (zhi xuji, shou jingdu), meaning that by relinquishing desires, one may attain the empty and tranquil heart-mind of the Dao. This is a vital method of cultivation—through ultimate emptiness and stillness, one contemplates and realizes the Great Dao.

 杳冥之極復能常守清靜則德化淳厚矣  列子曰莫如靜莫如虚靜也虚也得其居  也西升經曰人能虚空無爲非欲於道道  自歸之嚴君平曰道德虚無故能禀授天  地清靜故能變化陰陽反覆故能生殺日  月進退故能光曜四時始終故能育成釋  虚無則道德不能以然去清靜則天地不  能以存往而不反則陰陽不能以通進而  不退則日月不能以明終而不始則萬物  不能以生是故有而反無實而歸虚心無  所載志無所彰無爲如塞不憂如狂抱眞  履素捐棄聰明不知爲首空虚爲常則神  明極而自然窮矣動作反身思慮復神藏  我於無心載形於無身不便生者不以役  志不利天者不以滑神事易而神不變内  流而外不化覆視反聽與神推移上與天  遊下與世交神守不擾生氣不勞趣捨屈  伸正得中道 萬物並作吾以觀其復  人生而靜天之性今言致虚極守靜篤者  使人修之復於妙本也非止於人蓋萬物  之並動作者未有不始於寂然而發於無  形生於和氣而應於變化及觀其復也盡  反於杳冥而歸於無朕以全其形眞也易  曰復其見天地之心乎天地之心謂寂然  至無也君平曰天地反覆故能乆長人復  寢寐故能聰眀飛鳥復集故能高翔走獸  復止故能遠騰龍蛇復蟄故能章章草木  復本故能青青化復則神明得位與虚無
Interpretation

This scripture primarily elucidates the principle of returning to natural authenticity through the cultivation of emptiness, stillness, and non-action (Wuwei).

Laozi states that by reaching the profound and mysterious ultimate state and maintaining perfect stillness, one can refine virtue (De) and teachings into pure simplicity. Liezi believed there is no better state than emptiness and stillness, for only through them can one find true belonging. The Western Ascension Scripture (Xisheng Jing) points out that if one maintains a state of emptiness and non-action without deliberately pursuing the Dao, the Dao will naturally return to them. Yan Junping (a Han Dynasty Daoist scholar) explains: Because the essence of Dao and De is emptiness, they can bear heaven and earth; because of stillness, they can harmonize Yin-Yang; because of cyclical movement, they govern the motion of the sun and moon; and because of perpetual renewal, they give birth to all things.

Without emptiness, Dao and De cannot exist; without stillness, heaven and earth cannot endure; without returning, Yin and Yang cannot connect; without retreating, the sun and moon lose their light; without renewal, all things cannot grow. Therefore, one must return from "having" to "nothingness," from "substance" to "emptiness," keeping the mind free from attachment and the will free from deliberate display. Seemingly withdrawn yet truly non-acting, seemingly erratic yet free from worry—preserving innate purity, abandoning cleverness, not prioritizing cunning, and embracing emptiness as the norm—one can thus reach the ultimate state of spiritual clarity (Shenming) and fully align with the laws of nature.

In daily conduct, one should reflect inward; in contemplation, return to the origin of spirit (Shen). Place the self in a state of no-mind and the body in a space of no-form. Without clinging to life, the mind remains unburdened; without defying nature, the spirit remains undisturbed. Though external affairs shift, the spirit remains constant; though internal energy (Qi) flows, outward expressions remain subtle. Observe and listen repeatedly, resonating with the divine, connecting above with the celestial realm and below with the mundane world. The spirit is guarded yet unhindered; the life force (Qi) remains unexhausted, with all movements—advancing, retreating, bending, extending—conforming to the Middle Way.

All things grow and operate, yet I observe their return to the source. Humans are born with a nature of stillness—the teaching of "reaching the extreme of emptiness and holding fast to stillness" guides people to return through cultivation to the mysterious root. This applies not only to humans: though all things move and transform, none do not arise from silence, emerge from formlessness, are nurtured by harmonious Qi, and respond to change. Observing their return reveals that all ultimately revert to the profound and obscure, merging back into the traceless origin—only then can their true forms be preserved.

The Book of Changes (Yijing) states, "Returning reveals the heart of heaven and earth"—this "heart" refers to the state of absolute stillness and emptiness. Yan Junping said: Heaven and earth endure because of cyclical return; humans remain clear-minded because of rest; birds soar high because they return to their nests; beasts run far because they pause to recover; dragons and serpents manifest their wonders because they hibernate; plants and trees regrow because they return to their roots. When all things return to their origins, the spirits (Shenming) settle into their proper places, merging with the Dao of emptiness.

 通魂休魄息各得所安忘寧氣順血脉和  平此皆暫爾復靜猶能精神況乆歸至道  者乎 夫物芸芸各歸其根歸根曰靜靜曰復命復 命曰常  芸芸茂盛貌謂草木植物之類也或作云  云動作貌衆多貌謂飛走動物之類也以  義推之動植雖殊咸歸其根虚者沖漠之  謂靜者寂怕之謂沖漠寂怕者乃動植之  根本也且無者有之本靜者躁之君動之  極也必歸乎靜有之窮也必復乎無草木  之根重靜處下則長生花葉輕動居上則  凋落物尚如斯何況人乎故聖人舉喻使  民息愛欲之心歸乎虚靜之本則可以復  其性命之原矣性命之原即杳然冥然視  不見而聽不聞者也此唯明哲之自悟爾  能悟之者則行住坐卧不離乎虚靜寂寞  而應變不遷是得常道而復命者也 知常曰明不知常妄作凶  此言常道之難如此知猶悟也悟常道者  神變無方性無所不通氣無所不同不知  萬物之爲我我之爲萬物故能蹈水火貫  金石反山川移城邑乘虚不墜觸實不硋  千變萬化不可窮極此神合常道者也其  次則毓質不衰顔如處子住世千載猒而  上仙此形同常道者也其次則語默有法  出處合時動與陽同波光而不曜靜與陰  同德用晦而明世累莫千而身無咎此能  用常道者也若以治體爲宗則用常道爲
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the principle of all things returning to their origin. All living beings, whether plants or animals, ultimately return to the most fundamental state of stillness and emptiness. The roots of plants grow quietly buried in the earth, while the frivolous flowers and leaves waving above will eventually wither and fall—such is the way of all things, and humans should understand this truth even more profoundly.

Stillness is the foundation of movement, and emptiness is the source of all existence. When movement reaches its extreme, it inevitably returns to stillness; when development reaches its limit, it must return to emptiness. The sages use these natural phenomena as metaphors to advise people to relinquish greed and return to their innate nature of stillness and emptiness. Only then can one rediscover life's original state—the invisible, inaudible, yet truly existent "Dao" (the Way).

Those who truly comprehend this principle maintain a mindset of stillness and emptiness in all activities—walking, standing, sitting, or lying down—and remain composed in the face of change. Such individuals have already merged with the eternal Dao, attaining the state of returning to the origin. They become impervious to water and fire, able to pass through metal and stone, even altering mountains and cities, because their spirit has become one with the great Dao.

The next level includes those whose appearance never ages, maintaining eternal youth. They can live for millennia in the human world, eventually becoming superior immortals (xian). Below them are those whose speech and actions are measured, understanding the patterns of Yin-Yang transformation. They maintain a low profile in society yet radiate inner brightness, unburdened by worldly attachments.

If one cannot reach even these states, they should at least understand this: only those who know the eternal laws are truly wise, while those who act recklessly without understanding these principles will inevitably meet misfortune. The key to cultivating the Dao lies in returning to one's innate nature of stillness and emptiness—this is the most fundamental principle.

 上矣故曰知常曰明或作日明者言日益  明達此有漸之說也既悟常道當如上說  或不悟常道者反以神變爲妖長生爲誕  虚極靜篤爲空曠歸根傷命爲滅亡不知  强知不識强識舉心偽妄動作皆凶易所  謂不常其德或承之羞故曰妄作凶 知常容容乃公公乃王王乃天天乃道道 乃乆没身不殆  夫知常道者應用萬物善救無棄而無所  不包容也包容動植於己無私則襟懷蕩  然而至公矣至公無私則德用周普天下  無不歸往者矣王往也人既歸往天將祐  之理同自然於物无逆是曰眞人而能出  有入无冥乎大通乆與道合莫知窮極則  水火不能害金石不能殘世患莫侵有何  危殆(致虚守靜歸根復命是知常知常/之人道同大上故次之以太上) 太上下知有之  太上者謂太古之上無名號之君也所謂  上德不德者也其德無上可加故曰太上  雖有君位而不以尊自稱任物自然各正  性命故其教無爲其治無迹隨時舉事因  資立功百姓日用而不知其道但知有君  上而已謂帝何力於我哉莊子曰至德之  世不尚賢不使能上如標枝民如野鹿端  正而不知以爲義相愛而不知以爲仁行  而無迹事而無傳此太上之世也 其次親之譽之  上德既衰仁義章顯故天下被其仁者親  而附之懷其義者譽而舉之莊子曰及至
Interpretation

Those who understand the constant Dao (the Way) may be called enlightened. Some texts write this as "daily enlightenment," meaning growing increasingly wise and penetrating over time—referring to the gradual process of realization. Those who have already comprehended the constant Dao should adhere to the principles mentioned earlier.

As for those who fail to grasp the constant Dao, they instead regard miraculous transformations as demonic, view immortality as absurd, consider extreme tranquility as empty nothingness, and see returning to the root and cultivating one's nature and life as self-destruction. They forcibly seek to understand what they do not know and stubbornly memorize what they do not recognize. Their minds are restless with falsehood and delusion, and all their actions invite misfortune. As the Yijing (Book of Changes) states: Those who cannot maintain constant De (Virtue/Power) will ultimately suffer disgrace. Thus, reckless action inevitably brings disaster.

Those who truly understand the constant Dao can embrace all things, skillfully aiding everything without abandoning anything. This all-encompassing heart treats plants and animals without bias, achieving a state of perfect impartiality and selflessness. Those who are perfectly impartial and selfless extend their De (Virtue/Power) broadly across the world, and there are no people who do not submit to them. The term "king" (wang) means "to return to" or "to follow"—since the people submit, Heaven naturally protects them. Such individuals are in complete harmony with the natural order, never opposing the myriad things, and may be called "true persons" (zhenren). They can traverse the realms of being and non-being, communicate with the great Dao, and remain eternally united with it without end. Neither water nor fire can harm them; neither metal nor stone can destroy them. No worldly calamity can disturb them—how could there be any danger?

(To achieve emptiness and tranquility, return to the root, and restore one's nature and life is to understand the constant Dao. Those who understand the constant Dao attain a state identical to the "Supreme Venerable" (Taishang), hence the following discussion of the "Supreme Venerable.")

The "Supreme Venerable" refers to the nameless rulers of ancient times—those who embodied "supreme De (Virtue/Power) without claiming De." Their De was so exalted that they were called "Supreme Venerable." Though they occupied the throne, they did not exalt themselves in nobility, allowing all things to develop naturally and find their rightful place. Thus, their teaching was Wuwei (non-action), their governance left no trace, they acted in accordance with the times, and they achieved merit by relying on conditions. The people felt their rule in daily life without being aware of it, knowing only that a ruler existed. As Zhuangzi said: In the age of perfect De and Dao, they did not exalt the worthy or employ the talented. Those above were like the tips of tree branches, and the people were like deer roaming the wilds. They acted rightly without considering it righteousness, loved one another without considering it benevolence, left no traces in their actions, and left no records of their deeds. Such was the age of the "Supreme Venerable."

By the time De declined, humaneness and righteousness began to appear. The people of the world drew close and submitted through the experience of humaneness, and they praised and revered through the practice of righteousness. Zhuangzi said: When...

 聖人蹩躠爲仁踶跂爲義而天下始疑矣  疑則親譽生焉又曰舜有羶行百姓悦之  故三徙成都堯聞其賢舉之登庸因而禪  位此親之譽之也 其次畏之侮之  仁義失而刑法立刑法立則禁令嚴禁令  嚴而民畏之夫禁令雖嚴而權詐爲事者  民從其化而爲欺罔民欺罔則侮上之深  者也鴻烈解曰太上仁化謂太上下知有  之也其次使不得爲非謂親之譽之也其  次賞賢而罰暴謂畏之侮之也 信不足有不信  心有愛之謂誠言可復之謂信信全則天  下安信失則天下危今既權詐聿興欺罔  並起君信不足于下故下有不信之心應  之夫上之化下也如明鑑之接形容而理  無差焉王弼曰御體失性則疾病生輔物  失眞則疵釁作信不足焉則有不信此自  然之道矣 猶其貴言  自親而下已喪太上無爲之化不能復淳  古之風猶其貴重言教執守陳迹以爲化  方雖然失道遠矣不猶愈於忽言不信而  致犯上作亂者乎 功成事遂百姓謂我自然  夫有道之君垂拱無爲故功業成而不有  憺默清靜故事務遂而忘知民皆淳朴無  所妄爲謂我自然而然也親譽畏侮之心  於何而有哉舊說信不足有不信覆釋畏  之侮之猶其貴言覆釋親之譽之功成事  遂百姓謂我自然覆釋太上下知有之類
Interpretation

When sages deliberately display benevolence and forcibly implement righteousness, the people of the world begin to harbor doubts. Once doubts arise, affection and praise follow. Just as Shun, due to his virtuous character, was beloved by the people—so much so that wherever he moved three times, new settlements formed—Yao, hearing of his worthiness, promoted and entrusted him with great responsibilities, eventually abdicating the throne in his favor. This is the result of affection and praise.

A step below affection and praise are fear and contempt. When benevolence and righteousness are lost, laws are established; once laws are in place, prohibitions become severe; with severe prohibitions, the people grow fearful. Yet no matter how strict the prohibitions, if those in power manipulate authority, the people will imitate them and become deceitful. When the people turn deceitful, they will deeply scorn their superiors. As the Huainanzi explains: The highest form of governance is transforming others through virtuous De (Virtue/Power), which represents the pinnacle of rule. Next is ensuring people dare not do wrong, which belongs to the level of affection and praise. Below that is rewarding the worthy and punishing the violent, which falls under the level of fear and contempt.

When rulers lack sincerity, the people do not trust them. Genuine love in the heart is called "sincerity," and keeping one's word is called "trust." When sincerity and trust are complete, the world is at peace; when they are lacking, the world is endangered. Today, manipulation and deceit are rampant, and fraudulent behavior is widespread precisely because rulers lack sincerity toward the people, so the people respond with distrust. The way superiors teach inferiors should be as natural and accurate as a clear mirror reflecting an image. Wang Bi said: When the body loses its original nature, it falls ill; when assisting the myriad things loses their true essence, problems arise. Naturally, insufficient sincerity invites distrust—this is an inevitable principle.

There is also the importance of verbal instruction. From the level of affection and praise downward, the pure and simple governance of Wuwei (non-action) from ancient times has already been lost, and the pristine simplicity of antiquity cannot be restored. Though emphasizing verbal instruction and adhering to old norms to educate the people is far from the Dao, it is still better than neglecting instruction and lacking sincerity, which leads to rebellion and disorder.

When great achievements are completed and undertakings fulfilled, the people say it happened naturally. A ruler who embodies the Dao governs with folded hands and Wuwei, so accomplishments are achieved without possession; serene and detached, affairs are completed without conscious effort. The people remain simple and natural, free from forced action, feeling everything occurs spontaneously. At this stage, how could there be any thought of affection and praise, fear and contempt? As old commentaries explain: "When sincerity is insufficient, distrust arises" refers to the level of fear and contempt; "the importance of verbal instruction" refers to the level of affection and praise; and "when achievements are fulfilled, the people say it happened naturally" refers to the highest state of Wuwei governance.

 乎膠柱調絃今不從焉(太上無爲至德不/顯及其仁愛親之)  (譽之則大道廢故/次之以大道廢) 大道廢有仁義  大道即太古無爲之道廢猶隱也又陵替  不行也人心不淳則大道隱廢至德不行  也然後仁愛漸生義利浸長故樸散以爲  器斯則大道廢有仁義也莊子曰魚相忘  乎江湖人相忘乎道術此喻大道之世也  及其兼愛爲仁裁非爲義故仁義生乎不  足是猶泉涸魚相與處於陸相呴以涇相  濡以沫不如相忘於江湖此諭大道廢有  仁義也 智慧出有大僞  夫敦慤隱廢則智慧出智慧出則大偽生  理勢然也莊子曰馬之眞性齕草飲水翹  足而陸喜則交頸相摩怒則分背相踶馬  智已此矣及至伯樂治之前有橛飾之患  後有鞭策之威加之以衡厄齊之以月題  馬乃介倪閵扼鷙曼詭術竊轡之智生矣  夫太古之時民居不知所爲行不知所之  含餔而熙鼔腹而遊民能已此矣及至聖  人屈折禮樂以飭天下之形縣跂仁義以  慰天下之心而民乃智詐漸毒頡滑堅白  解垢同異之辯生矣此所謂智慧出有大  偽也 六親不和有孝慈國家昏亂有忠臣  六親父子兄弟夫婦也禮記曰大道之行  也不獨親其親不獨子其子至仁忘親也  忘親者撫諸姪如己子事伯叔如己父六  親无有不和孝慈於何而彰如是則衆之
Interpretation

This passage explains how human-made moral concepts like benevolence and righteousness only emerge when the fundamental natural Dao is abandoned. When the Dao (referring to the ancient state of natural governance through wuwei [non-action]) becomes obscured and ceases to operate, human hearts lose their original purity, giving rise to notions like humaneness and propriety. As Zhuangzi illustrates: When fish swim freely in rivers and lakes, they naturally coexist without needing to care for each other; only when the spring dries up do they resort to moistening each other with saliva. This metaphor shows how artificial promotion of morality becomes necessary only after the loss of natural harmony.

When people lose their innate simplicity, all manner of cunning and scheming arises. Zhuangzi uses the example of taming horses: originally, horses freely grazed and drank, rubbing against each other when happy and kicking when angry. But after being harnessed by Bole (an ancient horse trainer), they began developing tricks to escape their restraints. In ancient times, people lived with natural simplicity, but when sages later established rituals, music, and moral codes to regulate behavior, it instead taught people deceit and sophistry. This is the meaning behind the saying, "When wisdom appears, great hypocrisy follows."

As for the harmony among the six familial relations (father-son, elder-younger brothers, husband-wife), there is no need to emphasize filial piety and parental kindness when they naturally exist. Similarly, in times of national peace, no special loyalty needs to be demonstrated. The Book of Rites states that in an age when the Dao flourished, people did not merely care for their own kin—they treated nephews like their own sons and served uncles like their fathers. The six relations naturally harmonized, making displays of filial devotion unnecessary.

 奉我親亦如我之奉衆親矣是以上下和  睦而親親相忘也若在長失均平之教居  幼有高下之心故違於大順則六親不和  而慈愛養親之迹見矣且聖人均平則四  海一家遊心姑射之山杳然忘其天下矣  此則君上無爲而蒼生自化於何而有抉  目剖心之臣哉是故瞽瞍頑而舜稱大孝  魯晳嚴而參稱能養夏桀立而龍逢彰商  紂亡而比干顯斯不得已而爲之非樂然  也(大道廢而仁義彰智慧出而大僞作欲/復淳風在乎絶滅聖迹棄去智詐故次)  (之以絶/聖棄智) 絶聖棄智民利百倍  聖者謂制度法象功用陳迹之聖也絶之  者欲復其渾樸也河上公曰五帝畫象倉  頡造書不如三皇結繩無文之治也智者  謂權變謀慮揣摩縱横之智也棄之者欲  歸於無爲也經曰以智治國國之賊夫不  顯功用陳迹之聖不用揣摩縱横之智則  姦宄不生禍亂不作民如童蒙專事農業  則利民何止乎百倍莊子曰去小知則大  知明又曰善人不得聖人之道不立盜跖  不得聖人之道不行故須絶棄之民始獲  其利也 絶仁棄義民復孝慈  仁者愛物則人親之義者宜物則人譽之  而仁義之弊在乎親譽親譽既行則跂尚  奔競之心生而性命之和失矣性命之和  失則孝慈之行何由而有今使絶而棄之  是欲人全性命而復孝慈也
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist concept of "rejecting sageliness and abandoning wisdom." The core message conveys:

Treat your own family members with the same impartiality as you would treat all people's relatives. When superiors and inferiors live in harmony, family members will naturally forget their special bonds. If elders lose impartial guidance while juniors maintain notions of superiority and inferiority, this violates the natural Dao (the Way), leading to familial discord. It's precisely in such situations that people deliberately display forced acts of filial piety and care.

The sage regards all things equally, viewing the four seas as one family. Like the immortal beings of Mount Gushe described in the Zhuangzi, they transcend worldly concerns and forget the empire's affairs. If rulers govern through Wuwei (non-action), the people will naturally transform—why would there be need for loyal ministers like Bi Gan and Long Feng to die remonstrating? Though Shun's father Gusou was obstinate, Shun became the model of great filial piety; though Zeng Shen lived in poverty, he devoted himself to serving his parents. Such forced displays of loyalty and filial piety arise from necessity, not genuine joy.

The text then explains "rejecting sageliness and abandoning wisdom": The so-called "sage" refers to those who establish ritual systems and leave traces of achievement—we must discard these to return to simplicity. As Heshang Gong noted, the pictographic writing of the Five Emperors' era and Cangjie's creation of characters pale in comparison to the simplicity of the Three Sovereigns' knot-record keeping. The so-called "wisdom" refers to scheming and political maneuvering—we must abandon these to return to Wuwei. Governing through cleverness ultimately harms the state. Without flaunting achievements or employing stratagems, cunning will not arise, and people can farm with childlike single-mindedness, reaping benefits a hundredfold.

Regarding "rejecting benevolence and abandoning righteousness": Benevolence means universal love, righteousness means proper conduct, yet promoting these virtues fosters favoritism and praise, which in turn stimulates competitive minds and damages human nature. Once nature is damaged, genuine filial piety and kindness become difficult to sustain. Therefore, we must discard these artificial moral constructs, allowing people to recover their natural dispositions so that filial devotion and kindness may flow spontaneously.

絶巧棄利盜賊無有  巧者雕斲刻削機械扃鐍之謂也利者珠  玉斗斛權衡符璽之謂也夫機械扃鐍權  衡符璽之屬於小則能守備於大則不可  禦寇今日絶棄之者是猶擿玉毁珠焚符  破璽使民朴鄙而盜自止也 此三者以爲文不足故令有所屬  屬繼也三者謂絶聖棄智絶仁棄義絶巧  棄利言此三者雖欲不用而復其淳古之  風然紀之爲文垂之爲教尚未明白於理  不足故人多有疑難之者别令有所屬繼  使羣心涣然如冰之釋在下文 見素抱樸少私寡欲  見素謂守其純素不雜文飾聖迹智謀自  然絶矣抱樸謂歸其樸厚不徇矜夸仁義  之情自然棄矣少私謂守分至公不好外  美而機巧自然絶矣寡欲謂節儉制情泊  然安靜而浮利自然遺矣夫聖智之迹可  以救近而不知傷遠仁義之情可以濟急  而不知違眞巧利之器可以助小而不知  害大故聖人明而不顯知而不用唯以見  素抱樸爲懷少私寡欲爲念如是治國而  民躋富壽復于古風修身則槁體灰心嗒  然喪耦矣(聖迹絶則機智自忘仁義絶則/慈孝親睦斯由學者之弊故次)  (之以絶/學無憂) 絶學無憂  夫道者杳然難言豈學者可得而進故可  傳而不可授可得而不可具輪扁之伎非  不傳也蓋無受伎之質也況聖人之道乎
Interpretation

This passage advocates abandoning clever artifice and the pursuit of profit, as doing so naturally eliminates thievery. The term "artifice" (qiao) refers to intricate mechanical devices, locks, and tools; "profit" (li) denotes precious gems, jade objects, measuring instruments, seals, and talismans (fulu). While such implements may serve protective functions in limited contexts, their widespread use ultimately invites greater calamity. Just as discarding fine jade, destroying jewels, burning talismans, and breaking seals can return people to their original simplicity, so too will thieves naturally vanish when such temptations are removed.

These three principles—rejecting sagely wisdom (shengzhi), benevolence and righteousness (renyi), and clever profit-seeking—cannot be fully conveyed through words alone, hence the need for further explanation. Though these principles aim to restore the pristine simplicity of antiquity, mere textual instruction proves insufficient for complete understanding. Thus deeper exposition is required to dissolve people's doubts like melting ice.

Maintain innate purity and diminish selfish desires. "Manifesting simplicity" (jiansu) means preserving inner purity without false pretenses, thereby naturally transcending the constraints of sagely wisdom. "Embracing the uncarved block" (baopu) means returning to original simplicity, eschewing empty reputation and ostentation, thus abandoning the external forms of benevolence and righteousness. "Reducing selfishness" (shaosi) means abiding by one's true nature with selfless integrity, free from superficial cravings, thereby severing the roots of cunning artifice. "Diminishing desires" (guayu) means moderating emotions through tranquility, naturally eliminating the chase for profit.

The methods of sagely wisdom may solve immediate problems but harm long-term well-being; the practices of benevolence and righteousness can address emergencies yet violate fundamental truth; clever tools of profit may assist in minor matters but breed major disasters. Therefore, though sages understand these principles, they do not flaunt them—possessing wisdom yet refraining from its misuse. They take maintaining purity, simplicity, and reduced desires as their foundation. Governing in this way enriches the people with longevity, returning to ancient ways; self-cultivation achieves the state where self and objects are both forgotten.

The true Dao (Way) is profound and ineffable—how could mere study master it? The Dao can be transmitted but not directly bestowed, apprehended but never fully grasped. Like the wheelwright Bian's craftsmanship—not from unwillingness to teach, but from finding no one who truly comprehends—how much more so with the Dao of sages?

 今之學者但糟粕而已矣所言絶學非謂  其絶滅不學也謂守自然之性不越分外  而學也猶如鳧脛雖短續之則憂鶴脛雖  長斷之則悲夫離朱師曠天生聰明後之  學者或致眇塞性之長短豈跂慕矜夸所  能逮哉去其跂慕則無憂樂蓋禀其自然  之氣得乎聖人之心是以眞曷足求而妄  不足除也世之務學而有憂者垂首剌股  所趣不過虚名映雪聚螢所逐止存浮利  以致寵辱皆驚憂樂兩陷何其迷哉 唯之與阿相去幾何善之與惡相去何若  唯者恭譍也阿者慢應也以名教言之則  唯恭而阿慢以誠理論之唯阿皆譍聲也  而世之執者使變阿爲唯或以唯異阿是  未明唯阿之同出乎一聲相去何遠也若  忘世之執則無唯阿之分善者吉之稱惡  者凶之名學而履之者善也不學而悖之  者凶也夫道杳然虚極淵兮沉靜豈係學  與不學哉今爲善者無近名名極則害身  爲惡者無近刑刑極則殘生故善之與惡  非道之實乃外物耳既皆外物則相去奚  異哉唯其絶學者雖有聖智而不自知況  善惡唯阿乎或說云變俗學爲眞學變阿  爲唯變惡爲善如反掌耳上之言至理也  此之言世教也若以此辯又何以異乎唯  阿哉古本作美之與惡如上章天下皆知  美之爲美斯惡已 人之所畏不可不畏荒兮其未央哉
Interpretation

Modern scholars merely grasp superficial dregs of learning. The "transcendent learning" mentioned here does not advocate complete abandonment of study, but rather emphasizes preserving one's natural disposition without overstepping inherent boundaries. Just as artificially lengthening a wild duck's naturally short legs would cause it pain, or shortening a crane's long legs would bring it sorrow. The exceptional eyesight of Li Zhu (legendary sharp-eyed figure) and the musical genius of Shi Kuang (renowned ancient musician) were innate gifts - later scholars who force themselves to imitate such talents only achieve clumsy results. Can the natural endowments of individuals ever be altered through envy or boastful imitation? By relinquishing competitive comparisons, one naturally transcends the troubles of joy and sorrow.

When worldly learning is pursued with utilitarian motives, even the most extreme efforts like "hanging one's hair from a beam" or "pricking one's thigh with an awl" to stay awake, or "using fireflies as reading lamps" in snowbound nights, merely chase empty fame and fleeting profit. This creates anxiety over gain and loss, trapping practitioners in the predicament of fluctuating between honor and disgrace. In truth, how much difference exists between a respectful response and a casual reply? What substantial distinction separates good from evil? While conventional etiquette values respect over casualness, from the fundamental perspective of Dao, both are merely reactive sounds. Those obsessed with such superficial distinctions resemble people insisting on transforming "A" (casual assent) into "Wei" (formal assent), when both share identical essence. Transcending worldly discrimination liberates one from entanglement in such nominal differences.

So-called good and evil are merely human labels attached to fortune and misfortune: following Dao is deemed good, while opposing Dao is considered ominous. Yet the profound Dao remains profoundly serene - how could it concern itself with such artificial classifications? Performing good deeds need not seek fame, for excessive renown invites disaster; committing evil inevitably approaches punishment, yet excessive punishment harms life itself. Neither good nor evil represents Dao's essence - both are external manifestations without fundamental difference. Those who truly comprehend the realm of "transcendent learning" remain unaware of their sagely wisdom, let alone distinctions like good and evil.

Some claim that "transforming worldly learning into true learning, casualness into respectfulness, or evil into good is as easy as turning over one's hand" - this still operates within conventional education's framework. Such argumentation differs little from obsessing over "Wei" versus "A" distinctions. Ancient texts wrote "the beautiful and the ugly," echoing the earlier chapter's statement: "When all under heaven recognize beauty as beauty, ugliness is thereby conceived." What the masses fear, I cannot help but fear - this blind conformity creates boundless, directionless trends.

(Supplementary note: "Transcendent learning" refers to natural realization beyond formal study; "Li Zhu" and "Shi Kuang" exemplify innate differences; "Wei" and "A" illustrate superficial distinctions through response particles; the conclusion emphasizes that good/evil and beauty/ugliness are relative concepts, highlighting the importance of returning to natural disposition.)

 至人𡨋心妙道絶學無憂雖忘善惡於胸  中必順唯阿於形外善惡之戒不敢不畏  其唯藴道之深者乎小夫則不然慕善而  不行善畏惡而不去惡猒溺世學往而不  反荒廢眞性未嘗有中止之時央中也止  也 衆人熙熙如饗太牢如春登臺  熙熙悦樂之貌春臺時物之華此舉俞也  世人因學致偽逐境失眞汨没於愛欲之  波熙熙悦樂如餓夫之臨饗太牢忘無猒  足馳聘乎軒冕之途欣然觀望若遊子之  登賞春臺心迷不反也 我獨怕兮其未兆如嬰兒之未孩乘乘兮若 無所歸  怕寂也又安靜無爲貌兆者形狀之初孩  笑貌乘乘運動貌夫至人之心寂然安靜  無爲虚憺莫知其形狀之迹雖處乎囂塵  之間觀物之遷變瞳然若嬰兒之不能分  别笑耦也既而隨世混迹與物同波乘衆  人之所乘行不崖異浩然都任若無所歸  趣也又解乘乘若虚舟之東西而無所歸  止也怕一本作魄王弼作廓乘乘王弼作  儡儡一本作魁魁 衆人皆有餘而我獨若遺我愚人之心也哉 沌沌兮  沌沌不分貌夫人心有所係觸境如歸饕  餮於富貴之間謂其心有餘樂矣是以至  人粃糠世務纏繳紳修知軒冕之去來如  寄故獨忽之若遺忘耳此乃心宇沌沌而  莫分磅礴萬物以爲一愚人之心固欲辯  其美惡矣一本作純純者質樸無欲貌我
Interpretation

The perfected person maintains a mind clear as still water, having grasped the profound mysteries of truth. Transcending worldly knowledge yet free from anxiety, though internally making no distinctions between good and evil, their external conduct invariably adheres to ritual propriety. Regarding precepts of virtue and vice, they maintain constant reverence—this is the true realm of one who profoundly understands the Great Dao (Dao).

Ordinary people manifest the exact opposite: they admire virtuous deeds yet fail to practice them, fear wickedness yet cannot distance themselves. Immersed in worldly learning without emancipation, they gradually lose their innate nature, forever trapped in restless agitation (the term "yang" here signifies "cessation" or "interruption").

The masses bustle about chasing pleasures as if attending grand banquets or ascending springtime terraces for sightseeing. "Xixi" describes scenes of boisterous revelry, while "spring terrace" metaphorically represents splendid scenery. Yet these are mere appearances—people grow artificial through scholarly pursuits, become deluded by external phenomena, and drown in torrents of desire. Their greedy indulgence resembles starving men at feasts who cannot be satiated; their pursuit of fame resembles sightseers intoxicated by spring scenery who forget their homeward path.

Only the Dao-realized maintain the pure state of an infant ("pa" denotes quiescent non-action), their minds free from stirring desires ("weizhao"), like babies who have not yet learned to smile. Seemingly drifting with the current ("chengcheng" describes effortless movement), they actually transcend worldly concerns. The perfected person's heart resembles still water—though dwelling in the mundane world, they observe the transformations of all things with detached clarity, appearing muddled and simple like infants incapable of discrimination. They conform to worldly customs without seeking novelty, adrift like an untethered boat.

All people consider fame and wealth as abundance, while I alone regard them as floating clouds. This seemingly foolish, chaotic state of mind ("dundun" describes undifferentiated wholeness) actually demonstrates penetrating insight into worldly affairs. Ordinary people, driven by desires, greedily grasp at riches in the arena of fame, believing themselves inwardly fulfilled. The Dao-realized view achievements as transient clouds and worldly affairs as chaff, thus maintaining transcendental freedom. This state of undifferentiated unity with all things appears foolish in ordinary eyes (alternate versions use "chunchun" to describe a state of simple purity free from desire).

 愚人之心也哉猶云我豈愚人之心也哉  言非愚人之心實無分别則至人之心隤  然若此也 俗人昭昭我獨若昏  昭昭光燿自衒貌夫世俗爲學而日益浮  麗自謂昭昭光燿衒鬻才藝是以至人智  周萬物未嘗矜夸如同昏闇也 俗人察察我獨悶悶忽兮若海漂兮似無所 止  察察嚴明貌又苛急貌又矜持貌悶悶寬  裕貌或作惛惛者昩昩貌夫世俗因學爲  政制度嚴明立法苛急矜持有爲故民不  聊生是以至人體天法道因循任物在宥  天下寬裕昩昩民乃全其眞也莊子曰至  道之極昏昏默默然雖昏默不分晦冥難  測而萬物歸之莫知其所往百姓用之不  知其所竭善下廣納莫測其深故曰若海  而又應變之道莫定其方若流波漂揚無  所止著一本作忽若晦寂兮似無所止言  至人容儀忽然晦昩尸居其心寂靜無所  擊縶此壺丘子林之波流九變也二義俱  通今從上說 衆人皆有以我獨頑似鄙我獨異於人而貴 食母  以用也世人崇尚學業不能無爲而有所  施用故曰有以至人行若曳槁木居若聚  死灰不外飾其形故獨似頑鄙爾夫至人  出處語默非欲異於人而自然與人異何  也貴用其道爾用道者體與造化冥故曰  我獨異於人而貴食母食用也母道也本  也或說食養也母神也神能生身故曰母
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the distinction between those who have attained the Dao (zhiren, perfected persons) and ordinary people. Those who have attained the Dao may appear dull-witted, but this is because they have transcended worldly discrimination, maintaining a naturally peaceful state of mind. Ordinary people, by contrast, constantly flaunt their cleverness and talent, shining conspicuously.

Worldly people are calculating and exacting in all matters, while those who have attained the Dao are magnanimous and inclusive, seeming almost muddle-headed. They emulate the way of heaven (Dao), following the natural order, allowing people to preserve their innate simplicity. As Zhuangzi said, the most profound truth appears indistinct and chaotic, yet all things naturally return to it. The realm of those who have attained the Dao is as unfathomable as the ocean, while their response to change is as natural and unrestrained as flowing water.

Ordinary people pursue fame and purposeful action, whereas those who have attained the Dao remain as plain as withered wood or dead ashes. This is not an affectation of eccentricity, but because they take the Dao as their foundation. "Nourishing the mother" can be understood as sustaining the source of life—that is, following the great Dao. What makes those who have attained the Dao truly different is precisely their grasp of this fundamental principle.

 世人貴有欲以喪形至人貴無欲以養神  故異於人又曰母氣也世人嗜好滋味而  至人貴食和氣所以異於人也或曰老氏  以和光同塵爲務此篇何獨彼我之說云  云曰此豈至人之本意哉蓋不得已而言  也夫至人所行何嘗有異自是世俗動靜  相反因垂言立教故有彼此云爾(失禮之/憂因學)  (而有沌沌若昏德容光/大故次之以孔德之容) 孔德之容唯道是從  孔甚也大也容狀也從順也至人冥於道  者也常道無名唯德以顯之至德無本順  道而成之夫大德之人於諸相豈可見邪  唯有順道之容髣髴是其狀矣 道之爲物唯怳唯惚  夫道杳然難言故眂聽不能聞見何物之  可謂邪今言物者蓋因强名以究妙理也  夫大德之人能從順于道道既無形何從  之有既無其形又不可名當何以爲從乎  唯叩其怳惚者則可以影響其象罔耳怳  似有也在有非有惚似無也居無非無居  無非無即空是色也在有非有即色是空  也有無不可測復假借于象物以明道也 惚兮怳其中有象怳兮惚其中有物  象者氣象物者神物即莊子之所謂眞君  今之所謂性者也夫道怳惚不定謂其無  邪惚然自無形之中怳爾變其氣象將爲  萬物之朕兆也謂其有邪怳然自有象之  初惚爾而化歸於無有也然而至無之中
Interpretation

Ordinary people pursue desires yet harm their bodies, while perfected persons (zhiren) honor desirelessness to nourish their spirit (Shen). This differs from common practice. It is also said: The root lies in primordial Qi (Yuanqi). Ordinary people crave fine flavors, while perfected persons value harmonizing their vital energy (Qi), hence their distinction from the masses.

Someone might ask: Laozi advocates "blending with the light and merging with the dust" (harmonizing with worldly affairs), so why emphasize difference here? In truth, this is not the original intent of perfected persons—it is spoken out of necessity. The actions of perfected persons are inherently unremarkable; it is only because worldly behavior contradicts them that teachings must be established to clarify these distinctions.

"The appearance of great Virtue (Da De) follows the Dao completely." "Kong" signifies vastness, while "rong" refers to outward manifestation. Perfected persons merge wholly with the Dao. The constant Dao has no name and can only be revealed through Virtue (De); the highest Virtue has no fixed form, taking shape entirely in accordance with the Dao. Those of great Virtue cannot be recognized by appearance—only through their alignment with the Dao can their state be faintly discerned.

"This thing called the Dao is elusive and indistinct, impossible to grasp." The Dao is profound and beyond words; eyes and ears cannot perceive it—how then can it be called a concrete thing? Here, "thing" is merely a forced designation to probe its mysterious principles. Greatly virtuous persons can align with the Dao, yet the Dao has no form—how does one align with it? Since it is formless and nameless, how should it be followed? Only by contemplating this elusive state can its presence be faintly sensed. "Elusive" suggests seeming existence yet actual absence; "indistinct" suggests seeming absence yet actual presence. What appears empty contains essence; what appears real lacks substance. This ambiguous state between being and non-being requires concrete examples to clarify the nature of the Dao.

"Within the elusive, there are signs; within the indistinct, there is substance." Here, "signs" refer to traces of primordial Qi (Yuanqi), while "substance" denotes the essence of spirit (Shen)—what Zhuangzi calls the "True Ruler," or what we term innate nature. The Dao exists in this indeterminate state: say it does not exist, yet from formlessness it suddenly manifests signs, becoming the omen of all things; say it exists, yet at the moment of manifestation, it abruptly dissolves back into emptiness. Yet within absolute emptiness...

 有神物焉神物者陰陽不測妙萬物以爲  言者也千變萬化無所窮極經營天地造  化陰陽因氣立質而爲萬類治身治國鍊  粗入妙未有不由神物者也 窈兮冥兮其中有精其精甚眞其中有信  窈深遠貌冥寂墨貌夫道怳惚不能定象  物不能見又窈兮深遠冥兮寂墨問者不  知其體應者不眀其理然而中藴純粹之  精畜乎自然之信其精非偽故曰眞其化  應時故曰信猶烏足之爲蠐螬人血之爲  野火朽瓜爲魚賢女爲石雖動植之類萬  殊未有不精感而變信至而不化者也非  至德敦能通於此 自古及今其名不去以閲衆甫吾何以知衆 甫之然哉以此  閲度也又披也甫本始也夫道上自往古  下及來今湛然常存而不去形雖不見名  常在焉以喻至人得道長年故能閲度萬  物之本始知其皆始於道故閲之以成其  形質也又設問我何以知萬物皆資禀於  道生死終始之然哉答以道之怳惚窈冥  常在不去故能應變爲治清靜無爲度閲  萬物之遷移未有不資禀于道者以此也  (大德之人從順於道順道/則曲
Interpretation

Here we discuss the concept of the "divine substance." This so-called divine substance (referring to the mysterious workings of the Dao) transcends the transformations of Yin-Yang and marvelously governs all things. Its myriad transformations are inexhaustible—it operates heaven and earth, creates and transforms Yin-Yang, and through Qi (the fundamental element composing all things), it forms various material manifestations, thereby generating all phenomena in the world. Whether in self-cultivation or governing a nation, from the coarse to the subtle, none can depart from the workings of this divine substance.

The Dao (the cosmic origin and principle) is profound and obscure, yet within it lies pure Jing-Qi (the essential life force). This Jing-Qi is utterly authentic, containing trustworthy principles. "Yao" describes depth, while "ming" describes obscurity. The Dao is elusive and cannot be fixed in form; no thing can directly perceive it. Those who inquire about it do not understand its essence, and those who respond to it do not grasp its workings. Yet within it lies pure Jing-Qi, accumulating the natural laws. This Jing-Qi is not false, hence it is called "authentic"; its transformations accord with the times, hence it is called "trustworthy." Just as a bird's foot can transform into a cicada larva, human blood can become will-o'-the-wisps, a rotten melon can turn into fish, and a virtuous woman can transform into stone—though the varieties of plants and animals are countless, none fail to change through the resonance of Jing-Qi or deviate from the unchanging laws. Without supreme virtue, how could one comprehend this principle?

From ancient times to the present, the name of the Dao has never perished, for through it we observe the origin of all things. How do I know the truth of all things' origin? It is through this Dao. "Yue" means to observe and measure, while "fu" means the beginning. The Dao has continued from high antiquity to the present, clear and eternal, never perishing. Though its form cannot be seen, its name endures forever. This illustrates how sages who attain the Dao, being united with it, achieve longevity. Thus, they can observe and measure the origin of all things, knowing they all arise from the Dao. The Dao observes all things and thereby forms their substance. Again, how do I know that all things receive from the Dao and undergo the processes of life and death? The answer is: because the Dao, though elusive and obscure, is eternally present. Thus, it follows transformations to govern and, in serene Wuwei (non-action), observes the changes of all things—none fail to receive from the Dao. This is precisely the reason.

(Those with great De (Virtue/Power) follow the Dao, and by following the Dao, they bend to achieve wholeness. Hence, the following discusses the principle that "the bent becomes whole.")

全故次之以曲則全) 道德眞經藏室纂微篇卷之三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0103); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →