中文 · EN

《道德真經衍義手鈔》Vol. 10

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 10 / 20 3,328 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經衍義手鈔》 Vol. 10 (Dongshen 洞神部, 20 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 7 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經衍義手鈔》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

道德眞經衍義手鈔卷之十量八     五峯清安逸士王守正集    道常無爲章第三十七 道常無爲而無不爲  衍義云道以無爲爲常  鈔莊子天地篇之辭故曰古之畜天下者  無欲而天下足無爲而萬物化又云無爲  爲之之謂天無爲言之之謂德  衍義云天下之善人少而不善人多  鈔莊子胠篋篇之辭此乃盜跖答其徒之  言由是觀之善人不得聖人之道不立跖  不得聖人之道不行天下之善人少而不  善人多則聖人之利天下也少而害天下  也多    上德不德章第三十八 上德不德是以有德下德不失德是以無德  衍義云支離所爲百姓日用而不知  鈔支離所爲者謂其德支折離散不彰其  用不顯其名之義也莊子人間世篇云支  離疏者頤隱於臍肩高於項會撮(上言外/切下子)  (外切謂/頭髮也)指天五管在上(五管五/臓也)兩髀(音/陛)爲  脅挫鍼治繲(□□切縫/衣洗浣)足以糊口鼓筴(初/□)  (切揲/蓍也)播精足以食(音/似)十人上徵武士則支  離攘臂於其間上有大役則支離以有常  疾不受工上與病者粟則受三鍾(六石四/斗曰鍾)  與十束薪夫支離其形者猶足養其身終  其天年何況支離其德者乎若能保其常  名者如此百姓日用而不知者易繫辭云
Interpretation

In the eighteenth volume of Handwritten Commentary on the Extended Meaning of the True Scripture of Dao and De (Daode Zhenjing Yanyi Shouchao), Wang Shouzheng, a reclusive scholar of the Qing'an lineage from Wufeng, elucidates the core ideas of Daoist philosophy.

Regarding the chapter on "The Dao (the Way) is always Wuwei (non-action), yet nothing is left undone," he explains: The essence of the Dao lies in following nature and avoiding deliberate action. Zhuangzi, in the Heaven and Earth chapter, states that ancient rulers of the world achieved prosperity without personal desires and allowed all things to flourish naturally without forced intervention. True action should be as effortless as the movement of heaven, and true speech should align with the nature of De (Virtue/Power).

The text observes that in the world, virtuous people are few while the unvirtuous are many. Quoting the Robber Zhi chapter of Zhuangzi, it recounts how the infamous robber told his followers: "The virtuous cannot establish themselves without understanding the Dao of sages, and the wicked cannot act without grasping it." Precisely because the virtuous are few and the wicked numerous, the Dao of sages benefits the world less often than it is exploited by the unvirtuous.

In explaining the chapter "Superior De does not appear as De," the commentary states: The highest De does not consciously display itself as virtuous, thus embodying true De. Lower forms of De constantly worry about losing the appearance of virtue and therefore lack genuine De. This is illustrated by the story of Zhili Shu (a character from Zhuangzi's Human World), whose body was twisted and deformed yet could still support himself. He earned a living by mending clothes and washing laundry, while his divination skills fed ten family members. When conscription came, his disability exempted him; when corvée labor was demanded, his chronic illness spared him—instead, he received government grain and firewood. This shows even those with physical imperfections can live out their natural lifespan, let alone those whose virtue appears incomplete. Those who preserve their innate nature embody principles as unnoticed yet essential as those described in the Xici commentary of the Book of Changes (Yijing)—utterly spontaneous and unforced.

 一陰一陽之謂道繼之者善也成之者性  也仁者見之謂之仁智者見之謂之智百  姓日用而不知故君子之道鮮矣此言上  德不以德爲德故百姓日用而不知也 上禮爲之而莫之應則攘臂而仍之  衍義云禮者履也謂可履而行之也辯上  下定貴賤  鈔辯上下者易履卦大象曰上天下澤履  君子以辯上下定民志者是也  衍義云玉帛交馳威儀相答  鈔魯語陽貨篇云孔子曰禮云禮云玉帛  云乎哉樂云樂云鍾鼔云乎哉禮記中庸  曰禮儀三百威儀三千一言以蔽之曰毋  不敬夫禮主於敬樂主於和有威可畏謂  之威有儀可法謂之儀夫玉帛者禮之物  以表其意者也鍾鼔者樂之器以導其和  者也是知言敬中和者禮樂之本也鍾鼓  者禮樂之末也故曰玉帛交馳威儀相答  擎跽曲拳進退顧揖此禮之文也故云末  焉其或交馳相答而莫之應則至攘臂而  仍之也  衍義云擎跽曲拳  鈔莊子人間世篇之文顔回曰擎跽曲拳  者人臣之禮也擎叉手也跽跪膝也曲拳  折腰也  衍義云莊子曰大禮與天地同節又曰以  禮爲翼者  鈔禮記樂記篇之文云大樂與天地同和  大禮與天地同節和故百物不傷節則祀  天祭地明則有禮樂暗則有鬼神又曰以  禮爲翼者所以行於世也者此莊子大宗
Interpretation

The alternation of Yin and Yang constitutes the Dao (the fundamental law of the cosmos). To inherit this principle is called goodness, and to fulfill it is called one's true nature. Benevolent people perceive it as benevolence, while the wise recognize it as wisdom. Ordinary people use it daily without awareness, which is why true gentlemen who understand the Dao are rare. This speaks of the highest virtue (De) that does not deliberately display itself as virtue, remaining unnoticed in people's daily lives.

Regarding the interpretation of "the highest rites are performed yet receive no response": The essence of rites lies in practice ("履" meaning to tread or enact), serving to distinguish social hierarchies and status. As the Xiang commentary on the Hexagram Lü in the Book of Changes states: "Heaven above and the lake below form the Lü hexagram. The nobleman accordingly distinguishes the noble from the humble to settle the people's hearts."

The manifestations of rites include: the exchange of ritual objects like jade and silk, and the dignified bearing that elicits mutual response. Confucius remarked in the Analects: "Are rites merely about jade and silk? Is music merely about bells and drums?" The Book of Rites clarifies: The core of rites lies in reverence, while the essence of music lies in harmony. Dignity inspires awe, and bearing provides a model for emulation. Jade and silk are but vessels to convey intent; bells and drums are but instruments to guide harmony. The true foundation of rites and music lies in inner reverence and harmony—external forms are secondary. When ritual exchanges and ceremonial displays meet no response, matters escalate to the point of rolling up sleeves to force compliance.

Specific ritual gestures include: cupping hands, kneeling, bowing, and making salutations—external forms ("擎跽曲拳"). The Zhuangzi records Yan Hui's explanation: These are the courtesies of ministers to rulers—"擎" means crossing hands, "跽" means kneeling, and "曲拳" means bowing in salute.

The Book of Rites further states: The highest rites align with the movement of heaven and earth. Zhuangzi elaborates: With rites as wings, one moves smoothly through the world. This shows rites are not merely norms but natural principles conforming to cosmic patterns. In sacrifices to heaven and earth, rites and music operate visibly while spirits oversee invisibly. True rites should function like a bird's wings—assisting humanity in aligning with the Dao's movement.

 師篇之文也既云大禮與天地同節又以  此爲翼而行於世則惡有攘臂之亂哉  衍義云來而不往非禮也往而不來亦非  禮也  鈔禮記篇之文此言禮以辯上下别親疏  攘者攘除衣袂以出臂而相仍引施報之  禮行於彼而彼不應則怒而相仍引也  衍義云一言之不讎一拜之不中兩國爲  暴骨則攘臂而仍之  鈔春秋宣公十二年楚文公又使求成于  晋晋人許之楚子曰非爾所知也武王克  商作頌曰綏萬邦屢豐年夫武以禁暴戢  兵保大定功安民和衆豐財者也故使子  孫無忘其章今我使二國暴骨暴矣今我  一戰而使晋楚之民暴骨于野是不能禁  暴矣  衍義云春秋時楚宣王朝諸侯義中備載  又云至德之世實而不知以爲忠  鈔莊子天地篇之辭至德之世不尚賢不  使能上如標枝民如野鹿端正而不知以  爲義相愛而不知以爲仁實而不知以爲  忠當而不知以爲信蠢動而相使不以爲  賜 是以大丈夫處其厚不處其薄居其實不居 其華故去彼取此  衍義云此晋宋之士所以蕩而忘及以至  國破身亡而不自知也  鈔晋司馬昭之時三年樵郡嵇康文辭壯  麗好言莊老而尚奇任俠與陳留阮籍兄  子阮咸河内山濤河南向秀琅琊王戎沛  人劉伶特相友善號竹林七賢皆崇尚虚
Interpretation

This passage examines the delicate balance between ritual propriety and human relationships. It begins by citing the Book of Rites to illustrate how rituals serve to distinguish hierarchical and familial relationships, noting that when ritual gestures go unreciprocated, conflict often arises (the phrase "rolling up sleeves" signifies preparing for physical altercation). The historical example of the Chu and Jin states during the Spring and Autumn period—whose war over ceremonial minutiae left commoners' corpses strewn across battlefields—vividly demonstrates the consequences of collapsed ritual order.

The text then references the Zhuangzi's "Heaven and Earth" chapter depicting an ideal society: where rulers grow like tree branches in natural harmony, and commoners roam freely like wild deer. Here, people act properly without ostentatiously displaying righteousness, interact sincerely without affectations of loyalty, and assist one another without keeping score—this spontaneous harmony represents the genuine "Age of Perfect Virtue (Zhide)."

Concluding with the cautionary tale of the Seven Sages of the Bamboo Grove from the Wei-Jin period, the passage observes that while luminaries like Ji Kang and Ruan Ji possessed brilliant talent and revered Lao-Zhuang philosophy, their excessive indulgence in abstract metaphysical debates ultimately contributed to national decline and personal ruin. The author thus concludes that true nobility resides in cultivating fundamental simplicity rather than chasing superficial elegance.

 無輕蔑禮法縱酒昏酣遺落世事鍾會方  有寵於司馬昭聞嵇康名而造之康箕踞  而鍜(都坑/切)不爲之禮會將去嵇康曰何所  聞而來何所見而去鍾會曰聞所聞而來  見所見而去遂深銜之山濤爲吏部郎舉  嵇康自代與濤書曰自說不堪流俗而非  薄湯武司馬昭聞而怒之康與東平吕安  親善鍾會因譛安康有盛名而言論放蕩  害時謂蕩而忘反以至國破身亡正謂此  爲證下所謂蕩而忘及以至國破身亡正  謂此也南史宋紀謝靈運陳郡陽夏人秘  書郎謝𤥺之子出爲永嘉太守郡有名山  水靈運素所愛好出守既不得志遂肆意  遊遨徧歷諸縣動踰旬朔理人聽訟不復  關懷所至輒爲詩詠以致其意在郡一周  稱疾去職遂移疾會稽修營舊業傍山帶  江盡幽居之美與隱士王弘之扎淳之等  放蕩爲娱有終焉之志自始寧南山伐木  開徑至臨海從者數百臨海太守王琇驚  駭謂爲山賊論曰謝氏自晋以降雅道相  傳景恒景仁以德素傳美景懋景先以節  美流譽方明行已之度玄暉藻續之奇各  擅一時可謂德門者矣靈運才名江左獨  振而猖獗不已自致覆亡人各有能兹言  乃信惜乎    昔之得一章第三十九 昔之得一者天得一以清地得一以寧神得 一以靈谷得一以盈萬物得一以生侯王得 一以爲天下正
Interpretation

This passage recounts the stories of two historical figures and includes an excerpt from Chapter 39 of the Daodejing (Classic of the Way and Virtue).

The first part describes the lives of Ji Kang and Xie Lingyun. Ji Kang was a renowned scholar of the Wei-Jin period who disdained conventional etiquette and treated the powerful Zhong Hui with contempt. When Zhong Hui visited him, Ji Kang was found forging metal with legs apart, ignoring his guest. Later, Ji Kang's unrestrained criticism of contemporary politics led to his execution by Sima Zhao. Xie Lingyun, a celebrated poet of the Southern Dynasties' Liu Song period, served as governor of Yongjia but neglected his duties, indulging instead in wandering the mountains and rivers while composing poetry. Eventually, he resigned under the pretext of illness. Leading hundreds of followers to chop trees and clear paths, he was mistaken by locals for a bandit. Despite his literary brilliance, his reckless behavior ultimately led to his downfall.

The latter part quotes Daodejing Chapter 39, emphasizing the importance of "the One" (i.e., the Dao): "Heaven attains clarity by the One, Earth attains stability by the One, the spirits attain their efficacy by the One, the valleys attain fullness by the One, the myriad things attain life by the One, and lords attain the means to govern the world by the One." This scripture underscores the necessity of aligning with the Dao, forming a contrast with the preceding tales of historical figures who suffered calamity by defying the proper Way.

Both stories illustrate that even exceptional talent cannot avert disaster if one disregards the Dao and indulges in self-will. This resonates with the Daodejing's teaching of "attaining the One" and harmonizing with nature.

 衍義云舉本經云道生一於物爲精元氣  也元氣爲道之子  鈔一者乃道之子沖和之妙氣也作陰陽  之本爲萬物之母古今不二終始無窮一  之爲言其大矣哉一者元氣也能陰能陽  而不屬於陰陽升玉京金闕而不爲清處  瓦甓茅薜而不爲濁乾元以之而資始坤  元以之而資生制御有爲則眞宰出焉  衍義云謂之眞君制御形軀謂之眞宰  鈔莊子齊物論之文非彼無我非我無所  取是亦近矣而不知其所爲使若有眞宰  而特不得其眹如是皆有臣妾乎其臣妾  不足以相治乎其遞相爲君臣乎其有眞  君存焉如求得其情與不得無益損乎其  眞也  衍義云侯王五等之爵王者萬乘之君  鈔王者四海之尊侯者五等之二固設五  等之爵有公侯伯子男以佐王者也萬乘  之君君者王也天子也天子提封百萬賦  六十四萬井出戎馬百萬匹兵車萬乘故  云萬乘之主  衍義云故能永有天下無思不服  鈔無思不服者此毛詩大雅文王有聲篇  云鎬京(武王/建都)辟癰(行/禮)自西自東自南自北  無思不服無思不服皇王烝哉(言武王作/邑於鎬京)  (箋云自由也言武王於鎬京行辟癰之禮/由四方而來觀者皆感武王之德化中心)  (無不歸服者也又云皇王烝哉者皇大也/烝君也世美武王德化大而能君者也)
Interpretation

This passage elucidates how the Dao generates all things and the fundamental importance of the concept of "One." The Dao first produces the "One," which represents the purest primordial Qi (cosmic source energy). This Qi serves as the foundation of both Yin and Yang energies and the origin of all phenomena. It can manifest as either Yin or Yang, yet transcends such dualities. It may ascend to the highest Daoist paradise of Jade Capital and Golden Towers (Yujing Jinqu) without becoming aloof, or dwell within broken tiles and thatched grass without being defiled.

Quoting the Zhuangzi's "Discussion on Making All Things Equal," the text illustrates how all things are interdependent. Though there appears to be a governing principle, no tangible evidence of it can be found. Like the relationship between ruler and ministers, there may exist a true sovereign—yet whether we discern this truth or not does not affect the existence of this "True Ruler" itself.

The passage then examines ancient political systems, referencing the Zhou dynasty's five noble ranks (Duke, Marquis, Earl, Viscount, Baron) and the Son of Heaven institution. The Son of Heaven governed vast territories, commanded massive armies, and possessed countless chariots—hence being called the "Lord of Ten Thousand Chariots." Citing the Book of Songs, it describes how when King Wu of Zhou established his capital at Haojing and conducted the Biyong rituals, people from all directions willingly submitted. This exemplifies the principle of "none who do not submit wholeheartedly," demonstrating how a true ruler's expansive virtue naturally inspires genuine allegiance.

Through this parallel between cosmogony and political systems, the text reveals the Dao as the supreme origin—though formless and invisible, it truly exists and governs all phenomena. Just as a sage ruler maintains order without direct intervention, the Dao's subtle workings inspire universal harmony.

 今引此以證言萬國歡心而歸服者亦由  得一而正之所致也故云侯王得一以爲  天下正 其致之天無以清將恐裂地無以寧將恐發 神無以靈將恐歇谷無以盈將恐竭萬物無 以生將恐滅侯王無以貴高將恐蹶  衍義云列子載杞國有人憂天地崩墜身  亡所寄  鈔列子天瑞篇之文云杞國有人(殷湯封/夏後于)  (杞周又封之今在陳留/雍丘縣今杞州地是也)衍義中載之已備  不復重録 故貴以賤爲本高以下爲基是以侯王自謂 孤寡不穀此其以賤爲本耶非乎  衍義云稱孤者如左傳孤與二三臣悼心  失圖  鈔春秋昭公七年楚子成章華之臺願與  諸侯落之奉承以來弗敢失隕(墜/也)而致諸  宗祧曰我先君恭王引領北望日月以冀  傳序相授於今四王矣謂恭康郟敖靈王  也嘉惠未至唯襄公之辱臨我喪孤與二  三臣悼心失圖社稷之不遑況能懷思君  德言有康王大喪多不暇楚靈無信所以  不終也  衍義云稱寡人者即先君以寡人爲賢之  例  鈔春秋隱公三年宋宣公捨其子與夷立  其弟穆公穆公有疾召大司馬孔父而屬  之曰先君捨與夷而立寡人以寡人爲賢  使主社稷若棄德不讓殁後先君若問與  夷其將何辭以對請子奉之以主社稷寡  人雖死亦無悔焉
Interpretation

This passage employs a parable from the Liezi to explain why all nations willingly submit—it is because the ruler has mastered the Dao (the "One"), thereby guiding the world back to the proper path. Thus, feudal lords and kings become models for all under heaven precisely because they uphold this fundamental Dao.

Should this foundation be lost, all things between heaven and earth would descend into chaos: the sky would collapse without its clarity, the earth would quake without its stability, the spirits would vanish without their efficacy, river valleys would dry up without their abundance, and all living things would perish without their vitality. Similarly, if feudal lords and kings lose their noble De (Virtue), they too will likely fall.

The Liezi·Tianrui chapter records a man from the state of Qi who constantly worried about the sky collapsing and the earth caving in (this Qi was a fief granted to the descendants of the Xia dynasty by King Tang of Shang, later re-established during the Zhou dynasty, located in present-day Qi County, Henan). This parable has already been explained in detail in the commentary and will not be repeated here.

Thus, nobility must take humility as its root, and loftiness must be built upon a lowly foundation. Consider how feudal lords and kings refer to themselves as "the solitary one," "the unworthy one," or "the unvirtuous one"—is this not a manifestation of humility as their foundation? The Zuo Zhuan records that when King Ling of Chu completed the construction of the Zhanghua Terrace, though he wished to invite other feudal lords to celebrate, only Duke Xiang of Lu attended. During the ancestral temple sacrifice, King Ling said, "Our ancestors longed to engage with the central states, and now, in my generation, I am the fourth ruler." Later, he lamented, "My ministers and I are so troubled by state affairs that we have no peace of mind, nor time to attend to the altars of state—how could we possibly reflect on the merits of our ancestors?" This clearly shows that King Ling of Chu lost the trust of the feudal lords and thus met an untimely end.

Another example from the Spring and Autumn Annals tells of Duke Xuan of Song: on his deathbed, he did not pass the throne to his son Yuyi but instead entrusted it to his younger brother, Duke Mu. When Duke Mu fell gravely ill, he told his minister Kong Fu, "The late ruler deemed me worthy and thus bequeathed me the throne. If I disregard virtue and fail to return the throne, how shall I answer when the late ruler asks about Yuyi in the afterlife? I beg you to assist Yuyi in ascending the throne, so I may die without regret." These are all examples of rulers taking humility as their foundation.

 衍義云稱不穀者若不穀惡其無成德之  例是也  鈔春秋成公十一年泰晋有令狐之會晋  侯先至秦伯不肯涉河晋厲公秦桓公也  秦背晋盟晋侯使吕相絶秦吕相詰秦伯  曰楚人惡君二三其德亦來告我曰秦背  令狐之盟而來求盟于我昭告皇天上帝  秦三公楚三王曰余雖與晋出入余惟利  是視不穀惡其無成德是以宣之以懲不  一
Interpretation

The term "不穀" (bùgǔ) is explained here in the context of condemning those lacking steadfast virtue, much like during the Spring and Autumn period.

The Spring and Autumn Annals record that in the 11th year of Duke Cheng's reign (580 BCE), the states of Qin and Jin held a covenant meeting at Linghu. The ruler of Jin arrived first, but the ruler of Qin refused to cross the Yellow River to meet (at that time, Jin was under Duke Li and Qin under Duke Huan). Later, when Qin broke its covenant with Jin, the Marquis of Jin sent Lü Xiang to condemn Qin. Lü Xiang rebuked the Earl of Qin, saying: "Even the people of Chu despise your inconstant virtue. They came to tell me: 'Qin has broken the covenant of Linghu, yet now seeks to form an alliance with us.' Yet we had already sworn this oath before the August Heaven God (referring to the supreme deity) and the Three Dukes of Qin and Three Kings of Chu (referring to their ancestral spirits)."

Lü Xiang continued: "Although our state of Jin has maintained close relations with Qin, I now value only practical benefits. The reason I address you as 'bùgǔ' (an ancient humble term rulers used for themselves, here employed derogatorily) is to publicly condemn your fickle virtue and punish this breach of trust."

(This content appears in Volume 10 of the Daode Zhenjing Yanyi Shouchao)

道德眞經衍義手鈔卷之十

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0106); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 9 Vol. 11 →