中文 · EN

《道德真經取善集》Vol. 11

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 11 / 12 8,117 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經取善集》 Vol. 11 (Dongshen 洞神部, 12 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 16 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經取善集》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

道德眞經取善集卷之十一悲六   宋饒陽居士李霖集  江海爲百谷王章第六十六 江海所以能爲百谷王者以其善下之  顧歡曰江海處下故百谷宗之王者居謙  則萬物歸之 故能爲百谷王  唐明皇曰言江海所以能令百川朝宗而  爲王者以其善居下流之所致也故易云  地道變盈而流謙此舉喻也故地道用謙  則百川委輸而歸往聖人用謙則庶民子  來而不厭爾  直以卑下故能爲百谷王王者歸往之義  能下下則民歸之如水之就下 是以聖人欲上人以其言下之欲先人以其 身後之是以處上而人不重處前而人不害  河上公曰欲在人之上法江海處謙虚欲  在人之前先人而後己也聖人在民上爲  王不以尊貴虐下故民戴仰而不以爲重  聖人在民前不以光明蔽後民親之若父  母無有欲害之心也 是以天下樂推而不厭  吕吉甫曰聖人之有天下也以言其位則  固欲上人也然以孤寡不穀爲稱而受國  之垢與不祥則以其言下之也以言其序  則固欲先人也然迫而後動感而後應不  得已而後起則以其身後之也夫唯以其  言下之則處上而人不重不重則以戴之  爲輕矣以其身後之則處前而人不害不  害則以從之爲利矣不重不害此天下樂  推而不厭也 以其不爭故天下莫能與之爭
Interpretation

This scripture uses the relationship between rivers and the ocean to illustrate the core Daoist principle of "humility and non-contention." The reason the ocean becomes the sovereign gathering place of all rivers is its ability to remain in the lowest position ("excelling at staying beneath"). Just as the Dao of earth (referring to natural law) reduces the full to replenish the humble, the ocean's humble position naturally attracts all rivers to flow into it.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (called Emperor Minghuang in commentaries) explains that this resembles how sages govern the world with humility, causing the people to follow them as naturally as children returning to their parents. The sage Heshang Gong further points out that to lead others, one must maintain humility like the ocean; to stand at the forefront, one must place personal interests behind. Such leaders, though occupying high positions, won't make people feel oppressed ("people don't feel burdened"); when standing ahead, they won't provoke envy or harm ("people don't injure them").

Lü Jifu (a Song Dynasty scholar) adds that although sages occupy exalted positions, they often use humble self-references like "the solitary one" and willingly bear the nation's disgrace and misfortunes ("accepting the country's filth and inauspiciousness"). They don't actively contend but act in accordance with circumstances ("moving only when compelled"). Precisely because they don't contend with others, no one in the world can contend with them ("none under heaven can contend with them").

Through this natural imagery of rivers and the ocean, the text reveals the Daoist wisdom of "humility" and "non-contention" in human affairs: true leadership isn't about forceful domination but winning hearts through humble inclusiveness. When leaders lower themselves and yield benefits to others, they gain genuine support from the people.

 羅什曰心形既空孰能與無物者爭  吕吉甫曰夫以其言下之以其身後之則  不爭者也樂推而不厭則天下莫能與之  爭也非體玄德者其能若是乎故曰以其  不爭故天下莫能與之爭  此章以謙下爲主江海善下故爲百谷王  聖人言下身後故天下樂推而不厭夫孰  能與謙下者爭哉    天下皆謂章第六十七 天下皆謂我道大似不肖  杜弼曰肖似也不與物同故曰不肖 夫唯大故似不肖  蘇子由曰夫道曠然無形頽然無名充遍  萬物而與物無一相似此其所以爲大也  若似於物則亦一物矣而何足大哉 若肖乆矣其細也夫  御註肖物者小爲物所肖者大道覆載萬  物者也洋洋乎大哉故似不肖若肖則道  外有物豈得爲大乎  王弼曰乆矣其細猶曰其細乆矣肖則失  其所以爲大矣故曰若肖乆矣其細也夫  吕吉甫曰天下徒見我道之大而謂其似  不肖而不知其所以大固似不肖也何以  言之大道汎兮其可左右無乎不在者也  彼其無乎不在無可疑者謂之似不肖而  不知其無不在而似不肖乃道之所以爲  大也蓋萬物莫非道也則道外無物則無  所肖者此其所以爲大也若有所肖則道  外有物矣道外有物則道有所不在其尚  得爲大乎  王元澤曰肖者有所似道爲萬物祖故體
Interpretation

Kumarajiva (the eminent monk) said: The human mind and body are fundamentally illusory—who could contend with this formless and imageless existence?

Lü Jifu (Northern Song Daoist Lü Huiqing) explained: Only those who use humble words when dealing with others and put their own interests last are truly free from contention. Such people are embraced by the masses without being resented, and naturally, no one in the world can contend with them. Unless one has truly comprehended "profound De (Virtue)," how could they achieve this? Thus, precisely because they do not contend, no one in the world can contend with them.

The core teaching of this chapter emphasizes the virtue of humility and staying low. Just as rivers and seas, by skillfully remaining in the lowest position, become the gathering place of all streams, the sage, by speaking humbly and putting personal gain last, is willingly upheld by all under heaven. Tell me, who could possibly contend with one so humble?

In Chapter 67, All Under Heaven Speak of It:

All under heaven say the Dao is vast, yet it seems unlike any concrete thing.

Du Bi (Northern Qi scholar) explained: "Xiao" means resemblance. Because the Dao does not resemble any particular thing, it is said to be "not xiao (unlike)."

Su Ziyou (Su Zhe) said: The Dao is boundless and formless, profound and beyond naming. It fills all things yet resembles none—this is precisely its greatness. If the Dao resembled some concrete thing, it would merely be an ordinary object—how then could it be called great?

If the Dao truly resembled a particular thing, it would long since have become insignificant.

Emperor Huizong of Song stated in the Imperial Commentary: Those that imitate concrete things are small; those that are imitated by all things are great. The Dao embraces and carries all things, vast and limitless, thus appearing unlike any particular thing. If the Dao resembled something, it would mean there exists something beyond the Dao—how could this be called "great"?

Wang Bi (Three Kingdoms metaphysician) said: "Its smallness would be long-standing" means that if it resembled a concrete thing, it would have long since diminished. Once it resembles something, it loses its essential greatness.

Lü Huiqing further explained: People under heaven only see the Dao's vastness and say it resembles no particular thing, yet they do not realize that its very greatness lies in this very lack of resemblance. The great Dao is omnipresent, filling the cosmos. Precisely because it is everywhere, it appears unlike any particular thing—this is why the Dao is great. All things arise from the Dao, and beyond the Dao there is nothing, so there is nothing for it to resemble. If the Dao resembled something, it would imply the existence of something outside the Dao—could such a Dao still be called "great"?

Wang Yuanze (Wang Anshi's son, Wang Pang) concluded: "Xiao" means resemblance to something. As the origin of all things, the Dao's essence (its true nature)....

 道者物當似我我豈似物乎蓋有所似則  是象彼者也象彼則彼必大而我小矣 我有三寳保而持之  唐明皇曰我道雖大無所象似然有此三  行甚可珍貴能常保倚執持可以治身治  國也  王元澤曰凡此三寳皆俗情所謂小而乃  至人之所以爲大也 一曰慈  王元澤曰慈主於愛愛物仁也而獨稱慈  者仁則廣德以覆下於末爲盛矣老子方  語其本故不曰仁而曰慈慈者父道仁之  本而不假爲者也  唐耜曰慈愛也禮記曰爲人父者止於慈  兹益也慈者人之本父子之道天性也人  之慈孝自得於所性之中無待於外矣仁  者人也以兼愛爲心去性遠矣老子方明  道德之要故以慈爲寳  宣聖五常以仁爲首釋迦十戒以殺爲先  三聖雖殊以慈爲本則一也 二曰儉  顧歡曰寳精愛氣不爲奢費  吕吉甫曰其行身也徐而不費以約爲紀  非儉乎  儉德之共也大禹修身以克儉爲費文王  爲治以節儉爲化儉之爲德大矣哉書曰  恭儉惟德 三曰不敢爲天下先  顧歡曰履謙居後不爲物先  吕吉甫曰未嘗先人而常隨人人皆取先  己獨取後非不敢爲天下先乎  王元澤曰於易則謙是也天地人神皆以  謙爲貴故聖人寳之  孔聖以仁道爲本以儉讓爲德亦寳此三  者而已 夫慈故能勇
Interpretation

In the Daode Jing, Laozi proposes that the Dao (the Way) is the origin of all things. It does not imitate any specific object; rather, all things should follow the Dao. If one were to say that the Dao imitates something, it would reduce the Dao to the level of ordinary things. The true Great Dao transcends form and appearance.

Laozi states that he holds three treasures:

The first is "compassion" (ci). The Tang Emperor Xuanzong explains that although the Dao is supreme, these three virtues can be cultivated for self-cultivation and governing the state. Wang Yuanze notes that while worldly people consider these virtues ordinary, sages regard them as fundamental. "Compassion" primarily refers to the natural love of parents for their children (the root of "benevolence" (ren)), distinct from deliberate universal love. The Book of Rites also states, "As a father, one should embody compassion." Confucius spoke of "benevolence," and the Buddha prohibited "killing"—though the teachings of these three sages differ, they all take "compassion" as their foundation.

The second is "frugality" (jian). Gu Huan interprets this as treasuring one's vital essence (Jing) and life energy (Qi), avoiding extravagance and waste. Lü Jifu describes it as a way of life guided by moderation. Both Yu the Great in self-cultivation and King Wen in state governance were renowned for their frugality, and the Book of Documents also praises "reverence and frugality as virtues."

The third is "daring not to be ahead of the world" (bu gan wei tianxia xian). Gu Huan explains this as maintaining humility and willingly taking a subordinate position. Lü Jifu clarifies that it means not striving to compete but always following others. Wang Yuanze adds that the "Modesty" (Qian) hexagram in the Book of Changes conveys the same idea—heaven, earth, humans, and spirits all value the virtue of humility.

Finally, it is noted that precisely because one harbors compassion, true courage can arise (such as parents becoming brave to protect their children). Confucius took "benevolence" as his foundation and "frugality and yielding" as virtues—in essence, he also treasured these three treasures.

 王弼曰夫慈以陳則勝以守則固故能勇 也  吕吉甫曰夫慈爲柔弱矣而能勝剛强是  能勇也  孟子曰仁者無敵帝舜性仁形爲四罪之  誅成湯克仁能勝夏桀之虐文王視民如  傷可謂慈矣一怒而安天下之民豈非勇  乎 儉故能廣  顧歡曰治身愛氣則性命自延治國愛人  則德化自廣  儉以修身則精神不費儉以治國則財用  有餘書曰慎乃儉德惟懷永圖 不敢爲天下先故能成器長  御註不爭而善勝者天之道道之尊故爲  器之長  河上公曰不爲天下首先成器長謂得道  人也我能爲道人之長也  舒王曰不敢爲天下先則物莫爲之先故  能成其器長 今舍其慈且勇舍其儉且廣舍其後且先死 矣  御註世之人知勇之足以勝人而不知慈  乃能勇知廣之足以夸衆而不知儉乃能  廣知器長之足尚而不知自後之爲要則  剛强之徒而已有死之道焉  顧歡曰棄捨慈悲且爲勇敢謂負氣輕死  以不懼爲勇不寳其氣而捨散其精不愛  其人而廣用其力舍其後己但爲人先所  行如此動入死地 夫慈以戰則勝以守則固  御註仁人無敵於天下故以戰則勝民愛  其上若手足之捍頭目子弟之衛父兄效  死而弗去故以守則固  唐明皇曰用慈以戰利在全衆用慈以守  利在安人各保安全故能勝固爾
Interpretation

Wang Bi states that deploying troops with a heart of compassion ensures victory in battle, while using it for defense creates unshakable stability—this is true courage. Lü Ji further explains that what appears soft and tender can overcome the rigid and strong; such is the great valor of overcoming hardness with gentleness.

Mencius cites three historical examples: the benevolent Emperor Shun maintained justice by exiling the Four Evils; the virtuous Tang of Shang overthrew the tyrant Jie of Xia; and King Wen of Zhou, who cherished his people, could pacify the realm with a single act of righteous anger—are these not the true martial achievements of sages accomplished through compassion?

Regarding the principle of frugality, Gu Huan explains it in terms of both self-cultivation and governance: individuals who treasure their Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy) prolong their lives, while rulers who cherish the strength of their people spread virtuous governance far and wide. Whether in nurturing the self or governing a state, practicing frugality brings abundance—as the Book of Documents states, "Guard frugality as your virtue, and you may plan for the long term."

On the wisdom of "daring not to be first in the world," commentators offer various insights: the Imperial Commentary notes that the Dao contends not yet excels in prevailing, so those who embody it naturally become leaders of all things. Heshang Gong regards this as the realm of a realized Daoist adept, while Wang Anshi emphasizes that by not striving to be first, one is instead elevated by all things as their superior.

The scripture concludes with a warning: abandoning compassion while boasting of valor, discarding frugality for extravagance, and rushing ahead without yielding—such rigid and violent approaches lead only to ruin. Gu Huan elaborates: reckless displays of brute courage, squandering vital essence, exhausting the people’s strength, and always seeking precedence are all paths to self-destruction.

Conversely, waging war with compassion unites people for victory, while defending with it ensures solidarity between ruler and subjects. The Imperial Commentary illustrates this with the principles that "the benevolent have no enemies" and "the people spontaneously protect their ruler as they would themselves." Emperor Xuanzong of Tang further clarifies that the key lies in preserving all life and stabilizing the hearts of the people.

天將救之以慈衛之  御註志於仁者其衷爲天所誘志於不仁  者其鑒爲天所奪則天所以救之衛之者  以慈而已此三寳所以慈爲先  河上公曰天將救助善人必與慈仁之性  使能自營助也  王元澤曰三寳皆以慈爲心言天救衛之  者以其慈故也  此章言道大而爲寳者三三寳之中以慈  爲本故篇終言天將救之以慈衛之     善爲士章第六十人 善爲士者不武  盧裕曰士者將帥不武謂不以武凌人  吕吉甫曰士之爲言事道而以將人爲任  也事道則不爭勝將人則用人之力何所  事武  若市南宜僚弄丸而兩家之難解孫叔敖  甘寢秉羽而郢人投兵 善戰者不怒  御註上兵伐謀而怒實勝思  河上公曰善以道戰者禁邪於心胸絶禍  於未萌無所誅怒也  舒王曰不怒則善戰  吕吉甫曰爲士而無所事武則善戰者不  怒善勝敵者不爭善用人者爲之下固其  宜也  戰危事也善戰者弔民伐罪而已豈有私  怒以用危事而害民者哉若湯放桀武王  伐紂是也 善勝敵者不爭  御註爭逆德也爭地以戰殺人盈野爭城  以戰殺人盈城勝敗特未定也不武所以  成其武不怒所以濟其怒不爭所以彌其  爭三者皆出于德故曰善  河上公曰善以道勝敵者附近以仁來遠  以德不與敵爭而敵自服
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how "compassion" (ci) is the fundamental means by which the heavenly Dao (the Way) saves and protects all beings, as well as the wisdom of true warriors who do not rely on force, anger, or contention.

Regarding "compassion": When heaven seeks to aid a person, it protects them through compassion. Those who harbor benevolence in their hearts are inwardly guided by heaven, while those without compassion have their wisdom stripped away by heaven. Thus, the method by which heaven rescues and safeguards people is through "compassion." This is why, among the "Three Treasures" (ci, jian, bugan wei tianxia xian—compassion, frugality, and not daring to be first in the world) of Daoism, "compassion" is ranked first. Heshang Gong (a Han Dynasty Daoist scholar) explains that when heaven wishes to assist the virtuous, it endows them with a compassionate nature, enabling them to help both themselves and others. Wang Yuanze (a Song Dynasty scholar) also believed that the Three Treasures all take compassion as their foundation, and heaven saves and protects people precisely because they embody this benevolence.

Regarding "skill in warfare": True generals (shi) do not subdue others through force. Just as the ancient recluse Shinan Yiliao of Chu resolved a feud between two families by juggling pellets, or as the famed Chu statesman Sunshu Ao averted war by calmly holding a feather fan while reclining. Those skilled in warfare do not resort to anger, for the highest military strategy relies on tactics rather than rage to achieve victory. Heshang Gong states that those truly versed in the art of war can eliminate wicked thoughts in their hearts and prevent calamity before it arises—there is no need for anger at all. Wang Anshi similarly held that avoiding anger is the path to true mastery in warfare.

Those who truly overcome their enemies do not rely on contention, for contention violates heavenly De (Virtue/Power). Historically, wars fought over land and cities have caused immense casualties, yet victory and defeat remain unpredictable. Not asserting dominance achieves true strength; not giving in to anger amplifies one's authority; not engaging in contention resolves disputes. These three wisdoms all stem from "De" (the manifestation of the Dao), hence they are called "skillful."

Heshang Gong further elaborates that those who truly understand the Dao conquer their enemies through benevolence and virtue, drawing the near to submit and the distant to come willingly—without actively contending, the enemy naturally yields. Examples like King Tang of Shang exiling the tyrant Jie of Xia or King Wu of Zhou overthrowing the despotic Zhou of Shang demonstrate that these acts were undertaken to rid the people of harm, not out of personal vengeance. This is the true essence of skillful warfare.

 劉仁會曰德感物賔故曰勝敵兵刃不交  故曰不爭  爭逆德也不爭而勝乃爲善也兵貴伐謀  不重交刃百戰百勝非用兵之善也善用  兵者不戰而勝善之善也 善用人者爲之下  御註智雖落天地不自慮也故智者爲之  謀能雖窮海内不自爲也故能者爲之役  辯雖彫萬物不自說也故辯者爲之使  河上公曰善用人自輔佐者當爲人執謙  下也  纂微曰善用人者以謙不以力故用輔弼  之臣則比之股肱心膂用將帥之臣則跪  而受鉞行而推轂 是謂不爭之德  吕吉甫曰體道者不爭不爭則天下莫能  與之爭則善爲士者不武善戰者不怒善  勝敵者不爭是謂不爭之德也 是謂用人之力  御註聰明者竭其視聽智力者盡其謀能  而位之者無智也  吕吉甫曰體道者能下人能下人者人樂  爲之用而不自用則善用人者爲之下是  謂用人之力 是謂配天古之極也  御註無爲爲之之謂天不爭而用人故可  以配天則至矣不可以有加矣故曰古之  極極至也木之至者屋極是也  此章言善爲士者不武夫不怒不爭用人  之力是不武也德則不爭力則用人故可  以配天無爲而無以加矣    用兵有言章第六十九 用兵有言吾不敢爲主而爲客  御註感之者爲主應之者爲客迫而後動
Interpretation

Liu Renhui explains that true De (Virtue/Power) can influence all things and naturally make enemies submit, hence it is called "conquering adversaries." The best victory is achieved without crossing blades, therefore termed "non-contention" (Wuwei). Because contention violates De, winning without battle represents the highest military strategy.

Those skilled in warfare value strategy over brute force—winning a hundred battles doesn't make one a true master. The genuine military expert can subdue enemies without fighting, which is the ultimate achievement. Those adept at employing others always maintain humility.

The Imperial Commentary states: Even with celestial wisdom, one shouldn't be self-righteous—thus the wise voluntarily offer counsel. Even with unparalleled talent, one shouldn't act arbitrarily—thus the capable willingly serve. Even with eloquence, one shouldn't boast—thus the articulate gladly contribute. Heshang Gong notes: Those who skillfully employ assistants must preserve a humble attitude.

The Compilation of Subtleties further elaborates: Effective leadership relies on humility rather than coercion. When appointing ministers, treat them as limbs and vital organs; when commissioning generals, reverently confer authority and personally escort their chariots. This embodies the "De of non-contention."

Lü Jifu observes: Those who comprehend the Dao (the Way) don't contend with others. Precisely because they don't contend, none in the world can contend with them. Thus, true warriors don't flaunt prowess, skilled fighters remain unprovoked, and masterful victors avoid contention—this is the "De of non-contention."

The Imperial Commentary indicates: Let the observant employ their vision, let the wise contribute their strategies, while leaders needn't appear exceptionally clever themselves. Lü Jifu adds: Those who understand the Dao can humble themselves before others, which is why people willingly serve them. Skillful leaders maintain this humble position—this is the essence of "harnessing others' strength."

This state may be called "matching heaven's ancient perfection" (the supreme state of aligning with celestial principles). The Imperial Commentary explains: The Dao of heaven follows natural Wuwei (non-action), excels at employing others without contention, thus achieving this ultimate state of cosmic harmony. "Perfection" here means the highest point, like the ridgepole of a house being its apex.

This chapter's core teaching: True warriors don't flaunt might, remain unprovoked, avoid contention, and skillfully utilize others' capacities. Through De, one achieves non-contention; through wisdom, one harnesses human potential—only thus can one match heaven's Dao and reach the supreme state of accomplishing all through Wuwei.

Chapter 69 discusses military principles: Ancient masters of warfare declared, "I dare not take the offensive but prefer to assume the defensive."

 不得已而後起謂之應兵應兵爲客者也  顧歡曰在國先舉在陣先動爲主和而不  唱迫而後動爲客先舉先動驕盈必危今  欲順天應人以自全保既不先舉是不爲  主不得已而用是故爲客 不敢進寸而退尺  御註不嗜殺人故難進而易退  吕吉甫曰主逆而客順主勞而客逸進驕  而退卑進躁而退靜以順待逆以逸待勞  以卑待驕以靜待躁皆非所敵也  王元澤曰不勇於殺伐 是謂行無行  御註善爲士者不武行而無迹  唐明皇曰爲客退尺不與物爭雖行應敵  與無行同矣  張君相曰兵由彼起我實不行應物而動  雖行無行  王元澤曰至仁之兵有征無戰與無行同 攘無臂  唐明皇曰攘臂所以表怒善戰者不怒若  無臂可攘 仍無敵  御註善勝敵者不爭  顧歡曰仍引也人既服德則班師振旅雖  欲引敵無敵可引 執無兵  御註用人之力故無事於執兵  唐明皇曰執兵所以表殺今已慈和爲主  故雖執兵與無兵同  王元澤曰雖有戰之名前無敵者故與不  戰同 禍莫大於輕敵  成玄英曰内明敵前境也輕染諸塵則致  三塗之禍 輕敵則幾喪吾寳  成玄英曰幾盡也輕敵則好勇而不慈廣  貪而失儉好進而不退盡失前三寳  吕吉甫曰苟爲不能出於無爲知主而不
Interpretation

This passage explores the wisdom of military strategy. Raising arms only when absolutely necessary is called "responsive warfare," and those who adopt this passive stance are termed "guests" (the defensive side). Gu Huan explains that those who initiate conflict domestically or strike first on the battlefield are "hosts" (the aggressive side), while those who maintain peace without provocation and only respond when forced are "guests." Those who strike first easily become arrogant and fall into peril, while those who follow heavenly will and respond to popular sentiment can preserve themselves.

Daring not to advance an inch but willingly retreating a foot demonstrates distaste for slaughter—thus making attack difficult but withdrawal easy. Lü Jifu observes that aggressors typically oppose cosmic principles while defenders comply with them, the former toiling while the latter remains at ease. Advancing breeds arrogance while retreating maintains humility; attacking appears hasty while defending shows composure. Using compliance to counter opposition, ease to counter toil, humility to counter arrogance, and calm to counter haste—these constitute unconquerable advantages.

The truly skilled commander neither flaunts military might nor leaves traces of action. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang notes that as the defensive side retreats a foot without engaging in conflict, though appearing to respond to the enemy, it's as if no action were taken. Zhang Junxiang adds that when war is instigated by others, one hasn't actually taken initiative but merely responds to circumstances—thus appearing active while actually practicing non-action (Wuwei).

The most benevolent army marches forth without actual combat, which amounts to non-action. Regarding "rolling up sleeves" (a gesture of anger), Emperor Xuanzong explains that skilled warriors never rage, as if having no sleeves to roll. Those truly adept at victory don't rely on contention—Gu Huan remarks that when opponents are already transformed by virtue (De), even if one wished to draw them into battle, there would be no enemy to engage.

Holding weapons without using them—Emperor Xuanzong observes that weapons exist for killing, but when rooted in kindness and harmony, bearing arms becomes like bearing none. No disaster surpasses underestimating enemies—Cheng Xuanying explains that internally belittling opponents resembles dismissing worldly temptations, leading to the calamity of falling into the three wretched rebirths. Underestimation makes one lose the "three treasures" (compassion, frugality, and not presuming to lead the world). Lü Jifu concludes that failing to govern through non-action, knowing only attack without understanding retreat, causes the loss of these precious qualities.

 知客知進而不知退是之謂輕敵輕敵則  喪吾之慈而失仁民愛物之心矣 故抗兵相加哀者勝矣  唐明皇曰抗舉也兩國舉兵以相加則慈  哀於人者勝  王元澤曰哀憐之心慈也慈故能勇所以  勝一本作相若亦通若之言兵刃相敵也  此章言用兵出於不得已故爲客退尺不  敢輕敵恐喪其寳故舉兵相加慈哀於人  者勝    吾言甚易知章第七十 吾言甚易知甚易行天下莫能知莫能行  御註道炳而易見故載之言則甚易知要  而易守也故見之事則甚易行孟子曰道  若大路然豈難知哉故道無難而天下無  難不能者不知反求諸己爾  蘇子由曰道之大復性而足性之妙用見  於起居飲食之間爾聖人指此以示人豈  不易知乎人能體此以應物豈不易行乎  然世常患日用而不知知且不能而況行  之乎  易則易知近則易行以其至易也非思慮  擬議之所能喻所謂不慮而知也以其至  近也非步驟遲速之所能至所謂不行而  至也用智以知之則淺矣故天下莫能知  用力以行之則莫能至故天下莫能行 言有宗事有君  御註言不勝窮也而理爲之本事不勝應  也而道爲之主順理而索循道而行天下  無難矣  言以無言爲宗事以無事爲君得其宗而  易知識其君而易行天下不能知不能行  者不知其宗與君而已
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses two core concepts: the Dao of warfare and the accessibility of the Dao (the Way).

Regarding the Dao of warfare, the text states: Knowing only how to attack without understanding retreat is a manifestation of underestimating one's enemy. Such underestimation leads to the loss of compassionate heart, forfeiting the innate care for people and all things. When two states raise armies against each other, victory belongs to the side that maintains mercy and compassion. The text emphasizes that military action must only be taken as a last resort, requiring constant vigilance and avoidance of underestimation—for underestimating the enemy causes the loss of the most precious virtue: benevolence.

Concerning the nature of the Dao, the scripture explains: The principles I teach are actually easy to understand and simple to practice, yet people in the world often fail to comprehend or implement them. The Dao is as evident as a broad road—not difficult to grasp. It manifests in daily life; the truths pointed out by sages reside in the routines of eating and resting. If people could perceive this principle to respond to affairs, practice would come naturally. Yet ordinary people constantly use the Dao without realizing it—they don't even recognize it, let alone put it into practice.

True principles require no exhaustive mental speculation; they become clear without forced pursuit. They are ever-present, attainable without deliberate action. Attempting to understand through cleverness leads to superficiality—hence the world fails to truly comprehend. Trying to practice through forceful effort leads to failure—hence the world cannot truly implement them.

Speech has its fundamental purpose; action has its guiding principle. Though words may vary infinitely, they root in reason; though affairs demand endless responses, they follow the Dao as their guide. By grasping this fundamental purpose and guiding principle, nothing in the world remains difficult. Speech takes "non-speaking" as its purpose; action takes "non-action" (Wuwei) as its guide. Understanding this purpose makes comprehension easy; mastering this principle makes practice simple. The reason people cannot understand or practice these truths is precisely because they haven't grasped this fundamental purpose and guiding principle.

夫唯無知是以不我知  蘇子由曰言者道之筌也事者道之迹也  使道可以言盡則聽言而足矣可以事見  則考事而足矣惟言不能盡事不能見非  舍言而求其宗遺事而求其君不可得也  蓋古之聖人無思無爲而有漠然不自知  者存焉此則思慮之所不及是以終莫吾  知也 知我者希則我者貴  河上公曰希少也唯達道者乃能知我故  爲貴也  纂微曰至道之言有宗有君惟明者知之  故希少矣  惟知者少此所以爲貴也使淺識以知聖  人則豈足貴邪 是以聖人被褐懷玉  河上公曰被褐者薄外懷玉者厚内匿寳  藏德不以示人也  王弼曰被褐者同其塵懷玉者寳其眞也  聖人之所以難知以其同塵而不殊懷玉  而不顯故難知而爲貴也  褐者麤淺之服玉者精貴之寳被褐者顯  麤於外和光同塵若愚若昏不殊於俗懷  玉者藏寳於内懷道抱德匿名藏譽不示  於人與珉中玉表者異矣莊子曰聖人懷  之衆人辯以相示也此章言道易知易行  然天下莫能知莫能行者以言有宗事有  君也夫惟有宗與君是以知者少也聖人  所以難知者寳此道而被褐故爾    知不知上章第七十一 知不知上不知知病  吕吉甫曰道之爲體不知而能知者也知  其不知而以不知知之至者也故曰知不
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the profundity of the Dao and the realm of sages. The true Dao cannot be fully expressed through words nor completely manifested through concrete matters. The ancient sages attained a state of thoughtless non-action (Wuwei) and spontaneous harmony with heaven, a realm that transcends ordinary human comprehension, which is why few can truly understand them.

Those who understand me (referring to the Dao-realized person) are rare, and precisely because of this, those who can emulate me become truly precious. The phrase "wearing coarse cloth while holding jade within" is a metaphor: the sage outwardly wears rough hemp garments (symbolizing ordinary appearance), yet inwardly cradles precious jade (symbolizing the invaluable inner nature). This means sages appear no different from ordinary people externally, yet contain precious moral cultivation within. They do not deliberately display their virtue (De), just as one would conceal jade within coarse clothing.

Zhuangzi said that sages keep the Dao in their hearts, while ordinary people constantly argue to display it to others. This chapter illustrates that the Dao is actually easy to comprehend and practice, yet few in the world truly understand and embody it. Because the Dao has its fundamental principles (zong) and sovereign ruler (jun), only a handful of wise individuals can apprehend it. The reason sages are difficult to understand lies precisely in their concealment of the precious Dao beneath ordinary appearances.

The later mention of "knowing not-knowing is supreme" means: recognizing what one does not know represents the highest wisdom; not knowing yet believing one knows constitutes a flaw. Those who truly understand the Dao realize it cannot be fully grasped through ordinary cognition (not-knowing), yet this very awareness represents the most superior understanding (supreme).

 知上矣雖知其不知而以知知之則其心  庸詎而寧乎故曰不知知病矣  温公曰知之如不知則遠怨不知而强知  則招患 夫惟病病是以不病  唐明皇曰夫惟能病强知之病是以不爲  强知所病 聖人不病以其病病是以不病  吕吉甫曰夫惟知知之爲病而病之則反  乎無知而知不足以病之矣故曰夫惟病  病是以不病聖人不病以此而已故曰以  其病病是以不病南伯子綦曰我悲人之  自喪者吾又悲夫悲人者吾又悲夫悲人  之悲者其後而日遠矣若子綦者可謂病  病者乎  王元澤曰病而不自知病者終莫悟矣  此章言道本無知知其不知爲上不知而  用知以知之則爲病聖人之不病者知知  之爲病而反乎無知是以不病    民不畏威章第七十二 民不畏威則大威至  河上公曰威害也人不畏小害則大害至  謂死亡也畏之者當愛精養神承天順地  也  成玄英曰内明威刑也所謂經戒科律大  威即三塗惡趣北都羅酆之刑法也言一  切衆生未解眞理愛樂世法輕而行之則  𡨋中大刑必將至矣  劉仲平曰詩云畏天之威于時保之蓋衆  人不知畏天之威故大威至矣  有威可畏謂之威衆人不知畏天之威則  無所不爲此天之大降其威虐而禍罰所  加也故曰大威至矣書曰罔不惟畏弗畏  入畏 無狹其所居
Interpretation

This passage from the Daode Zhenjing Qushan Ji primarily discusses the dialectical relationship between "knowing" and "not knowing." The truly wise (those who know the highest truths) understand the limits of their knowledge. Forcing understanding through artificial "knowing" only brings inner turmoil. Thus, pretending to know what one doesn't is the real affliction.

Sima Guang (Duke Wen) explains: Feigning ignorance can avert resentment, while pretending to knowledge invites disaster. Only by recognizing forced knowing as an affliction can one avoid being trapped by it. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang's commentary notes: The sage's freedom from this affliction stems precisely from viewing forced knowing as pathological.

Lü Jifu elaborates further: When one recognizes that "forced knowing" itself is the problem, one returns to the original state of natural unknowing and non-striving. Thus "knowing" ceases to be a burden. Like Nanbo Ziqi (a Daoist figure) said: "First I mourned for those who had lost their true selves, then I mourned for those who mourned for others, until finally I relinquished even this mourning"—this represents the true realization that "forced knowing is an affliction."

Wang Yuanze concludes: The most dreadful condition is having an affliction without recognizing it. This chapter's essence teaches that the Dao fundamentally transcends cognition—the highest wisdom lies in recognizing what one doesn't know. Forcing understanding through artificial knowledge creates obstacles. Sages avoid this affliction precisely because they understand forced knowing is the root problem.

Chapter 72 discusses the principle of "awe": When people cease fearing rightful authority, greater calamities will follow. Heshang Gong explains: Here "awe" (wei) refers to calamity. Those unafraid of minor misfortunes invite major disasters like death. What truly deserves reverence is nurturing the spirit and aligning with heavenly principles.

Cheng Xuanying interprets from a cultivation perspective: This "awe" implicitly refers to spiritual discipline. The "great awe" signifies hellish punishments (the three wretched destinies and the northern Luo Feng prison). Beings who scorn truth for worldly indulgence will inevitably face underworld retribution. Liu Zhongping cites the Book of Songs: When multitudes disregard heaven's majesty and act wantonly, celestial punishment follows. As the Book of Documents states: Those who fear not what should be feared will ultimately confront true terror.

The conclusion advises: "Do not constrict your dwelling place"—suggesting practitioners should maintain expansive mental openness.

 御註居者性之宅人之性至大不可圍而  曲士不以語於道者狹其所居故也擴而  充之則充滿天地包裹六極無自而不可  孟子曰居天下之廣居  唐明皇曰神所居者心也無狹者除情去  欲使虚而生白 無厭其所生  御註生者氣之聚人之生通乎物之所造  而厭其所生者旦晝之所爲有梏亡之矣  梏之反復則夜氣不足以存彼保合大和  而無中道夭者無厭其所生故也  河上公曰人所以生者以有精神精神託  空虚喜清靜飲食不節忽道念色邪辟滿  腹爲伐命散神也  劉仲平曰無狹其所居德之地也無厭其  所生德之本也德之地盡性也德之本至  命也故聖人不以人滅天不以故滅命  王元澤曰民性本自廣大流通而世教下  衰不能使之復樸乃蹙其居之廣而使狹  厭其生之通而使塞夫唯狹其居故民不  淳而偽唯厭其生故民不厚而薄彼聖人  不然使民逍遥乎天下之廣居而各遂其  浩然之性則其有干威者乎莊子曰狶韋  氏之圃黃帝之囿堯舜之宫湯武之室此  明世世下衰漸狹其居也彼聖人豈有優  劣乎而居乃漸狹者所遭之時則然也 夫唯不厭是以不厭  河上公曰夫唯獨不厭精神之人洗心垢  濁恬淡無欲則精神居之而不厭也  顧歡曰人不厭生生不厭人人不棄道道
Interpretation

The human nature is like a vast mansion, capable of infinite expansion. Those with narrow perspectives (petty scholars) fail to comprehend the Dao precisely because their mental dwelling is too confined. If one can open the capacity of the heart-mind, it can encompass all things between heaven and earth, existing everywhere. What Mencius called the "expansive dwelling" refers to this very state.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Emperor Ming of Tang) annotates: The abode of the spirit-mind (Shen) is the heart. One must eliminate selfish desires and distracting thoughts (removing emotions and desires), maintaining a heart-mind that is empty and pure (empty yet luminous). Only then can one avoid constraining one's inherent nature.

Regarding "do not despise life": Life is the coalescence of primordial Qi (Qi's gathering), and human life interconnects with all things. Those who despise life are bound by desires during the day (daytime actions that fetter and dissipate), repeatedly depleting their Qi until even the nightly rejuvenating vitality (night Qi) becomes insufficient for sustenance. Only by preserving the harmony of Yin-Yang (maintaining great harmony) and avoiding premature demise can one truly embody non-disdain for life.

Master Heshang explains: Human life depends on the spirit (Shen). The spirit delights in purity and emptiness. Indulging in excessive eating and drinking or yielding to desires (neglecting the Dao while filled with lustful and deviant thoughts) damages one's lifespan and scatters the spirit (depleting life and dispersing Shen).

Liu Zhongping observes: Not confining the dwelling of the heart-mind is the foundation of Virtue (De's ground), while not despising life is the root of Virtue (De's essence). The former pertains to fulfilling one's nature (exhausting nature), the latter to fulfilling one's heavenly mandate (fulfilling destiny). Thus, the sage does not use the artificial to destroy the natural (not using humanity to extinguish heaven), nor does he employ cleverness to harm life (not using contrivance to extinguish destiny).

Wang Yuanze points out: Human nature is originally vast and unobstructed, but as worldly teachings decline, people lose their way back to simplicity. Compressing the dwelling of the heart-mind makes it narrow; blocking the passage of life makes it stagnant. A narrow heart-mind leads to hypocrisy, while obstructed life leads to harshness. The sage, however, differs—allowing the people to dwell freely in the "expansive dwelling," fully developing their vast and upright nature (the nature of vastness). Zhuangzi uses the gardens of Xiwei, the parks of the Yellow Emperor, the palaces of Yao and Shun, and the houses of Tang and Wu as metaphors for how living spaces gradually shrink across generations. This does not mean the sages themselves differ in superiority but reflects the changes of the times.

Master Heshang adds: Only those who do not despise the spirit can cleanse the filth from their hearts (washing away mental defilement) and maintain serenity free from desire (tranquil and desireless). Only then can the spirit dwell peacefully without weariness.

Gu Huan concludes: If humans do not reject life, life will not reject humans; if humans do not turn away from the Dao, the Dao will not turn away from humans. This is a relationship of mutual fulfillment.

 不棄人故曰生與人相保人與道相得  西昇經曰神常愛人人不愛神若人不厭  其精神則精神居之而不去也 是以聖人自知不自見自愛不自貴  河上公曰自知己之得失不自顯見德美  於外而藏之於内自愛其身以保精氣不  自貴高榮名於世  吕吉甫曰聖人自知以常而不自見以外  其身知常而外其身乃所以不狹其所居  也自愛以嗇而不自貴以遺其生嗇而遺  生乃所以不厭其所生也  劉進喜曰保養眞性不輕染欲自愛也謙  卑靜退先物後己不自貴也  明以自知而不自見以矜能則其性廣而  物不能蔽所謂無狹其所居也仁以自愛  而不自貴以賤物則其生全而物莫能傷  所謂無厭其所生也夫然則豈至於干天  之威乎 故去彼取此  顧歡曰去彼見貴則威罰外消取此知愛  則生道内足  此章言上失其大道之化民亡其性命之  眞故雖有可畏之威而弗畏也唯無狹其  居以盡性無厭其生以至命豈有干威者  乎是以去彼見貴取此知愛亦使民廣其  居而不狹保其生而不厭也聖人去取灼  可見矣    勇於敢章第七十三 勇於敢則殺  顧歡曰不懼曰勇必果曰敢謂見威不懼  必果無回强梁使氣殺身之術  成玄英曰勇謂猛進也敢謂果决也殺謂  死滅也言進必果决貪於世事則死滅也
Interpretation

This passage expounds the wisdom of how practitioners of the Dao can align with the Way (Dao) and preserve life. Its core teaching states: Only by not abandoning anyone can we mutually preserve one another; only when humans harmonize with the Dao can life endure long.

The Western Ascension Scripture (Xisheng Jing) says that divine spirits (Shenming) constantly cherish humanity, yet people often neglect them. If one does not despise their own spirit (referring to innate Qi), then this spirit will permanently reside within the body without dissipating. Thus, those who attain the Dao (sages) possess self-awareness but refrain from self-display; they cherish their being yet do not consider themselves superior.

Heshang Gong (a renowned Han dynasty commentator) explains: Those who truly understand their own gains and losses do not outwardly display virtue (De), but instead conceal excellence within. They treasure their physical form to preserve essence (Jing) and Qi, never chasing worldly fame or superficial glamour.

Lü Jifu (a Song dynasty Daoist) adds: Sages maintain constancy with the Dao through inner awakening, never deliberately projecting external images. This awakening prevents people from being confined to narrow states of existence. By restraining desires to cherish life, and avoiding the depletion of vitality through lofty status, life can endure long without harm.

Liu Jinxi (a Tang dynasty Daoist) provides more detailed commentary: Nourishing one’s innate true nature (humanity’s original state) without allowing it to be tainted by desires constitutes genuine self-love. Maintaining humility and deference, prioritizing others before oneself—this is the mark of not considering oneself superior. With inner clarity and self-awareness, one refrains from flaunting talent, ensuring the mind remains expansive and unobscured by external things. Cherishing life with a benevolent heart, never belittling the external world due to status, allows life to remain whole and unharmed.

Gu Huan (a Southern Dynasties Daoist) concludes: Eliminating habits of ostentation and superiority naturally dispels external calamities; adopting an attitude of self-awareness and self-love ensures the inner Dao of life flourishes. This chapter observes that when rulers lose the transformative power of the Great Dao, the people forfeit their authentic nature. Only by not limiting life’s framework and not rejecting the root of existence can one avoid violating the awe of Heaven’s Dao. The sages’ principle of discernment is clear: relinquish vanity, choose true love, and grant the people vast space for life.

Chapter 73, "On Courageous Daring," further elaborates: Reckless boldness invites fatal disaster. Gu Huan explains that "courage" (Yong) means fearlessness, while "daring" (Gan) denotes stubborn forcefulness—such aggressive indulgence in Qi is truly a path to death. Cheng Xuanying (a Tang dynasty Daoist) states that rash advancement is called "courage," and arbitrary stubbornness is called "daring." Obsession with worldly affairs inevitably leads to ruin.

 羅什曰心定所行果而望得眞去邪來遂  獲其罪故言殺 勇於不敢則活  羅什曰行柔弱唯善是與則獲其利言活  活長生也若進心虚淡不敢貪染則長生  顧歡曰謂獨立不懼不敢有爲守柔盡順  活身之道  舒王曰莊子曰聖人以必不必故無兵衆  人以不必必之故多兵勇於敢以不必必  之故多兵而殺勇於不敢以必不必故無  兵而活  吕吉甫曰用其剛强而必於外物者勇於  敢者也則死之徒是也故曰勇於敢則殺  致其柔弱而無所必者勇於不敢者也則  生之徒是已故曰勇於不敢則活 此兩者或利或害  河上公曰兩者謂敢與不敢也活身爲利  殺身爲害  王弼曰俱勇而所施者異利害不同故曰  或利或害也  吕吉甫曰勇於敢者人以爲利而害或在  其中矣勇於不敢者人以爲害而利或在  其中矣 天之所惡孰知其故  御註畸於人者侔於天人之所利天之所  惡孰從而知之 是以聖人猶難之  御註順天者存逆天者亡雖聖人不敢易  也 天之道不爭而善勝  御註萬物之出與之出而不辭萬物之歸  與之歸而不迕是謂不爭消息滿虚物之  與俱而萬物之多皆所受命是謂不爭而  善勝  唐明皇曰此下言天道謙虚以戒人事勇  敢天不與物爭四時盈虚物無違者故善  於勝 不言而善應
Interpretation

This scripture primarily examines the contrasting outcomes between the attitudes of "daring" and "not daring." Kumarajiva (Jiumoluoshi) explains that when the mind is tranquil and actions are upright, one attains the true Dao; whereas indulging in wicked thoughts invites misfortune. The phrase "those who are brave in daring will be killed" suggests that aggressive competitiveness brings calamity, while "those who are brave in not daring will live" indicates that maintaining a gentle and humble attitude leads to longevity.

Gu Huan argues that preserving an independent yet fearless mindset, refraining from forceful action, and yielding to the way of softness is the correct method for self-preservation. Wang Anshi (Shuwang) cites Zhuangzi, noting that sages act without coercion, thus avoiding conflict, whereas ordinary people provoke strife by insisting on unnecessary pursuits. Boldness in aggression ("brave in daring") invites fatal consequences, while restraint ("brave in not daring") safeguards life.

Lü Huiqing (Lü Jifu) observes that stubbornly pursuing external things exemplifies "brave in daring," representing the path to death, while embracing softness and flexibility constitutes "brave in not daring," the path to survival. These two attitudes—one seemingly advantageous but actually harmful, the other seemingly disadvantageous but ultimately beneficial—reveal the paradox of human behavior.

Both Heshanggong and Wang Bi agree that courage applied differently yields entirely distinct results. The will of heaven is inscrutable; what humans desire may be what heaven despises, and even sages cannot fully comprehend it. The Dao of heaven does not contend yet naturally prevails, as seen in the orderly progression of the seasons and the compliance of all things—this is "prevailing without contention." Emperor Xuanzong of Tang highlights how this principle uses heaven's humility to admonish humanity: heaven does not compete with the myriad things, yet the changing seasons command universal obedience—this is true victory.

In summary, this scripture contrasts the consequences of "daring" and "not daring," emphasizing that yielding without contention and aligning with nature embody the survival wisdom of the heavenly Dao. Aggressiveness appears beneficial but is perilous, while humility and retreat seem disadvantageous yet preserve life. The Dao operates silently, effortlessly guiding all things to compliance—a model for human conduct in achieving "prevailing without contention."

 王元澤曰天何言哉四時行焉百物生焉  福善禍淫酬酢萬變無一不生  劉仁會曰寂寞無聲故曰不言有感則報  故言善應 不召而自來  御註有所受命則出命者能召之矣萬物  之紛錯而天有以制其命孰得而召之健  行不息任一氣之自運而己 繟然而善謀  蔡子晃曰雖坦蕩平夷善能謀圖善惡毫  分不差  王元澤曰常易故坦然知險故善謀 天網恢恢疏而不失  御註密而有間人所爲也天則雖疏而無  間積善積惡殃慶各以其類至所以爲不  失且爭而後勝言而後應者人也天則不  爭而善勝不言而善應召之則至難於知  天者人也天則不召而自來坦然而善謀  惟聖人爲能體此故不就利不違害常利  而無害所以與天合德異夫勇於敢者  曹道冲曰物不能逃者天網也恢大疏略  物無漏者  包羅上下六合萬物不能逃其内者天網  也恢恢甚大雖則疏略賞善禍淫毫分不  失此章言勇於敢與不敢夫勇敢者天之  所惡雖聖人猶難於勇敢下文言天道謙  虚當視以爲法    民常不畏死章第七十四 民常不畏死奈何以死懼之  顧歡曰奈何猶如何也道德陵夷刑罰深  酷則生不足懷死不足畏人不畏死本由  刑政之苛如不慕大德以生人更設嚴刑  以懼物民將抵冒而終不化修已奢淫則
Interpretation

Wang Yuanze said: Does Heaven need to speak? The four seasons revolve naturally, and all things grow of their own accord. Good deeds bring blessings, evil deeds invite misfortune. The Dao's response to all affairs manifests in countless ways—not a single thing escapes its principles.

Liu Renhui explains: The Dao of Heaven is silent and thus called speechless, yet when stimulated, it invariably responds. Therefore it's said that good actions necessarily bring good rewards—they come without being summoned.

The Imperial Commentary further clarifies: If it were human commands, the issuer could summon their execution. But with the myriad things being so complex, only Heaven can govern their destinies—who could summon the Dao of Heaven? It simply operates ceaselessly, allowing Qi to circulate naturally.

Cai Zihuang observes: Though the Dao of Heaven appears simple and straightforward, it excels at planning and arrangement, distinguishing good from evil without the slightest error. Wang Yuanze adds: Because the Dao remains constant it appears straightforward, yet because it understands hardship it excels at planning.

Regarding the phrase "Heaven's net is vast—coarse-meshed yet nothing slips through," the Imperial Commentary explains: Human laws may have loopholes no matter how strict, whereas Heaven's net appears loosely woven yet leaves no gaps. Accumulated virtue brings blessings, accumulated evil brings misfortune—each according to its kind, thus nothing is missed. Ordinary people must fight to win, must speak to be answered, but the Dao needs no struggle to prevail, requires no words to respond—this is difficult for mortals to comprehend.

Cao Daochong points out: What nothing can escape is Heaven's net. Boundless in expanse yet seemingly sparse, its rewards and punishments never err by a hair. This chapter mainly discusses the difference between reckless courage and proper restraint—indeed, rash boldness is what Heaven despises, something even sages find difficult to practice as true courage. Later passages emphasize the Dao's humility, which people should emulate.

Chapter 74 addresses how people cease fearing death:

Gu Huan explains: "Why" means "for what reason." When virtue declines and punishments become severe, life becomes unworthy of attachment and death unworthy of fear. That people don't fear death stems precisely from harsh governance—if instead of cultivating virtue to let people live in peace, one uses severe punishments to intimidate, the people will transgress laws and remain unteachable. When rulers themselves indulge in extravagance and debauchery...

 精窮氣竭萬神交落動之死地不能制情  遣欲更爲險行驚神  上失其道民無常心以抵冒法禁何死之  畏上猶以死懼之釿鋸制焉繩墨殺焉而  亂終不止則秦以下是也 若使民常畏死而爲奇者吾得執而殺之孰 敢  御註天下樂其生而重犯法矣然後奇言  者有誅異行者有禁荀卿所謂犯治之罪  固重也  河上公曰以道教化而民不從反爲奇巧  乃應以王法執而殺之誰敢有犯者老子  傷時王不先以道德化人而先刑罰  王弼曰詭異亂眞謂之奇也 常有司殺者殺  唐明皇曰如此奇詐之人天網不失是常  有司殺者殺之  杜光庭曰司主也天之養人也厚矣愛人  也至矣南宫丹籙賞善而司生北宫黑簿  紀過而主死天地萬神司察善惡以懲以  勸俾其革惡而遷善也故有功者延年有  罪者奪筭毫分無失如陽宫之考較焉天  有司命四司之星在虚危之間人星之側  以司於人此四司星者三元經所謂天之  司殺也 夫代司殺者殺是謂代大匠斲  河上公曰人君欲代殺之是猶拙夫代大  匠斲木乃勞而無功也 夫代大匠斲希有不傷其手矣  河上公曰人君行刑罰猶拙夫代大匠斲  木也必方圓不得其理還自傷其手代天  殺者失其紀綱不得其紀綱則反受其殃  也  吕吉甫曰聖人以道治天下者宜如何哉
Interpretation

This scripture primarily addresses how rulers should govern their people. It points out that when the people's Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy) are exhausted and their Shen (spirit) dissipates, they fall into perilous states, unable to control their desires. If rulers abandon moral principles, the people will lose their sense of reason and even transgress legal prohibitions.

Commentators have offered varying interpretations of this passage: Emperor Xuanzong of Tang believed that for those who engage in deceit, the Dao (the Way) has its own mechanisms of retribution—like a celestial net (tianwang) that naturally ensnares the wicked, just as the "executioner" (sishazhe), an office tasked with punishment, carries out its duties. Du Guangting elaborated further, explaining that the heavens record human virtue and vice through the Southern Palace (in Daoist cosmology, the bureau overseeing rewards for good deeds) and the Northern Palace (the bureau overseeing punishment for evil). Under the supervision of all celestial deities, good is rewarded and evil punished with unfailing precision.

The commentary attributed to Heshang Gong argues that if a ruler presumptuously takes it upon himself to enact heaven's punishments, it would be like an unskilled carpenter trying to replace a master craftsman in felling timber—not only futile but likely to injure himself. Lü Jifu synthesizes these views by concluding that sages should govern the world through the Dao.

The overarching emphasis is that rulers should prioritize moral transformation over punitive measures. The Dao has its own mechanisms of justice, and human interference often backfires. This reflects the Daoist political philosophy of "governing through Wuwei (non-action)," advocating alignment with natural laws and opposing excessive human intervention.

 常有司殺者殺勿代之而已矣何謂常有  司殺者殺天網恢恢疏而不失天討有罪  五刑五用則司殺者天之謂也刑戮者有  出於好惡而不用於天討則是代司殺者  殺也代司殺者殺是代大匠斲希有不傷  其手者則代司殺者殺其傷可知  此章言民無常心而不畏死當先化之以  道不可威之以刑若民畏死而爲奇者誅  之孰敢有犯然不可以自殺而有天之司  殺者若代殺之是猶代大匠斲未有不傷  其手矣
Interpretation

Laozi here expounds on the principle of celestial retribution. He states: There has always existed in the world a specialized force that administers punishment (the Executioner), and we should not overstep our bounds to usurp its role in meting out justice. What does "there is always the Executioner" mean? It refers to the celestial net of justice (Tianwang) which, though seemingly loose and wide, never lets any deserving offender slip through.

Heaven employs five forms of punishment (Wuxing) to chastise the guilty—this constitutes the true "Executioner." When punishments stem from personal biases rather than the impartial justice of the Dao, one is presumptuously executing heaven's will. This is like an unskilled person trying to chop wood in place of a master carpenter (Dajiang)—rare is the case where one doesn't injure one's own hand. Similarly, those who arrogate heaven's punitive authority inevitably bring harm upon themselves.

The core message of this chapter is: The common people inherently lack fixed fears and do not instinctively dread death. Rulers should first instruct them through moral principles rather than intimidating them with punishments. If people truly feared death, then punishing wrongdoers would deter all crime. Yet punishment should never be arbitrarily administered by individuals—it must follow the laws of the Dao. Those who presumptuously execute heaven's justice are like unskilled substitutes for master carpenters: none escape self-inflicted injury.

道德眞經取善集卷之十一

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0107); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 10 Vol. 12 →