中文 · EN

《沖虛至德真經鬳齋口義》Vol. 5

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 5 / 8 10,361 characters

About this page. The original text of 《沖虛至德真經鬳齋口義》 Vol. 5 (Dongshen 洞神部, 8 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 21 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《沖虛至德真經鬳齋口義》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

沖虚至德眞經鬳齋口義卷之五尅五     鬳齋林希逸    湯問第五 殷湯問於夏革曰古初有物乎夏革曰古初 無物今惡得物後之人將謂今之無物可乎 殷湯曰然則物無先後乎夏革曰物之終始 初無極已始或爲終終或爲始惡知其紀然 自物之外自事之先朕所不知也殷湯曰然 則上下八方有極盡乎革曰不知也湯固問 革曰無則無極有則有盡朕何以知之然無 極之外復無無極無盡之中復無無盡無極 復無無極無盡復無無盡朕以是知其無極 無盡也而不知其有極有盡也  物雖自無而有既有矣則必有所始安得  謂之古初無物乎此語翻得又好極已猶  極止也物之之後終始無所止極如春先  而夏後春終而夏始先豈爲始後豈爲終  紀極也惡知其紀言無極也物之外事之  先朕所不知者即四維上下不可思量莊  子所謂六合之外存而不論也固問堅問  之也不得已而後答曰謂之無則無極既  有有之名則必有盡但不可得而知爾無  極復無無極此下數語與莊子有始也者  有未始有始也者有未始有夫未始有始  也者一樣語脉也莊子逍遥遊篇曰湯之  問棘此曰夏革棘革音近恐傳訛也然大  抵皆寓言爾名字異同不足深考 湯又問曰四海之外奚有革曰猶齊州也湯 曰汝奚以實之革曰朕東行至營人民猶是
Interpretation

This dialogue records a philosophical discussion between King Tang of Shang (founder of the Shang dynasty) and Xia Ge (likely a fictional sage) concerning the origin of the universe. King Tang begins by asking: "Did material existence exist in the most ancient beginnings?" Xia Ge responds: "In the beginning there was nothing at all. Where then did present existence come from? If we speak this way, might future generations regard our present as equally void?"

Tang persists in questioning whether material things have sequences of before and after. Xia Ge explains through the Daoist principle of cyclical recurrence: the end of things may mark another beginning, just as beginnings may imply endings—this cycle knows no boundaries. He candidly admits that while he understands the patterns of the material world, what lies beyond form or precedes events remains unknowable.

Regarding cosmic boundaries, Xia Ge offers a profound insight: if we speak of "non-being" (void), there are no limits; if we speak of "being" (existence), there must inevitably be endpoints. Yet the true mystery lies in this—beyond the infinite there still exists no boundary called "infinity," and within the endless there remains no concept of "end." This formulation resonates strikingly with Zhuangzi's cosmological reflections in the "Free and Easy Wandering" chapter.

The text notes that "Xia Ge" might be a scribal error for "Ji," though the author suggests such nominal discrepancies need not be scrutinized, as such dialogues often serve allegorical purposes. Finally, when Tang inquires what lies beyond the Four Seas, Xia Ge answers from experience: having journeyed east to Yingzhou (the ancient easternmost land), he found its people no different from those of the Central Plains. This response subtly implies the fundamental unity of all things in heaven and earth, echoing the earlier discussion of cosmic boundlessness.

Through this master-discourse format, the passage vividly demonstrates Daoist cosmological inquiry: acknowledging the limits of human understanding while emphasizing a worldview of "limitless infinity," embodying the Daoist commitment to truthful recognition—"to know what you know, and know what you don't know."

也問營之東復猶營也西行至豳人民猶是 也問豳之西復猶豳也朕以是知四海四荒 四極之不異是也  四海之外猶有國土或無國土皆不可知  譬如在於營者但見營之人民在於豳者  但見豳之人民豈知營之東又有如營者  豳之西又有如豳者以中國之所見且如  此況四海四荒四極之外乎齊州中國也  實之者欲其即近以明遠也海外曰大荒  大荒之外曰無極故曰四海四荒四極此  亦務爲高遠廣大之言莊列之書皆如是 故大小相含無窮極也含萬物者亦如含天 地含萬物也固不窮含天地也故無極朕亦 焉知天地之表不有大天地者乎亦吾所不 知也  大小相含譬如瓦在椽上椽在桁上桁在  梁上梁在柱上柱又在地上小大相乗載  物物皆然不可窮詰萬物既如此則天地  在於大虚之間太虚含天地者也太虚之  外又必有含太虚者含萬物者既不可窮  則含天地者亦安知其所極安知天地之  外不有更大於天地者含容也此等議論  皆是排斥小見自私之人不知世界之廣  大故爲此等虚曠之論雖似荒唐亦自有  味此章以下諸段皆然若要逐章求義理  則不可也讀莊列之書别具一隻眼可也 然則天地亦物也物有不足故昔者女媧氏 練五色石以補其闕斷鼇之足以立四極其
Interpretation

This passage employs a series of metaphors to illustrate the boundless vastness of the world and the limitations of human perception. Just as people living in a "camp" can only see others within their camp, and those dwelling in "Bin" territory perceive only their local surroundings, neither group realizes that similar settlements exist east of the camp or west of Bin. If even the inhabitants of the Central States (Qizhou) have such limited vision, how much more lies beyond the Four Seas, the Four Wastes, and the Four Extremes?

The author uses the phrase "Beyond the seas lies the Great Wasteland, beyond which lies the Wuji (Limitless)" to convey the immeasurable expanse of existence. Such descriptions aim to shatter narrow perspectives, echoing the works of Zhuangzi and Liezi that emphasize how all things—great and small—mutually contain each other without end. Consider how tiles rest on rafters, rafters on purlins, purlins on beams, beams on pillars, and pillars upon the earth—this nested relationship extends infinitely outward.

All phenomena exist within this web of mutual containment. Heaven and Earth dwell within the Taixu (cosmic void), yet beyond this void may lie greater spaces encompassing it. Since the space containing all things has no boundary, how could the realm containing Heaven and Earth possibly have limits? Who can definitively claim nothing greater exists beyond our cosmos?

These seemingly exaggerated statements actually serve to break the constrained worldview of narrow-minded, self-interested individuals. Though they may sound fantastical, profound meaning lies beneath the surface. When reading such texts, one shouldn't fixate on literal interpretations but approach them with an open mind.

The passage concludes with the myth of Nüwa mending the heavens, demonstrating that even Heaven and Earth—as mere phenomena among myriad others—possess imperfections. Thus in ancient times, Nüwa smelted five-colored stones to repair the sky's ruptures and severed the giant turtle's legs to prop up the Four Pillars. This further confirms that Heaven and Earth aren't flawless but require adjustment and completion like all things.

後共工氏與顓頊爭爲帝怒而觸不周之山 折天柱絶地維故天傾西北日月星辰就焉 地不滿東南故百川水潦歸焉  女媧之補天共工之折天柱絶地維此皆  務爲駭世之言不可以爲實論天之傾西  北此造化至妙處若無倚蓋之勢則星辰  之運日月之行何以見其盈縮何以爲晝  爲夜此須識天文者方知之知地有上下  四游之說天如雞子則安得有柱有維乎 湯又問物有巨細乎有脩短乎有同異乎革 曰渤海之東不知幾億萬里有大壑焉實惟 無底之谷其下無底名曰歸墟八紘九野之 水天漢之流莫不注之而無增無減焉其中 有五山焉一曰岱輿二曰貪嶠三曰方壺四 曰瀛洲五曰蓬萊其山高下周旋三萬里其 頂平處九千里山之中間相去七萬里以爲 鄰居焉其上臺觀皆金玉其上禽獸皆純縞 珠玕之樹皆叢生華實皆有滋味食之皆不 老不死所居之人皆仙聖之種一日一夕飛 相往來者不可數焉而五山之根無所連著 常隨潮波上下往還不得暫峙焉仙聖毒之 訴之於帝帝恐流於西極失群聖之居乃命 禺疆使巨鼇十五舉首而戴之迭爲三番六 萬歲一交焉五山始峙而不動而龍伯之國 有大人舉足不盈數步而暨五山之所一釣 而連六鼇合負而趣歸其國灼其骨以數焉 於是岱輿貪嶠二山流於北極汎於大海仙
Interpretation

This passage recounts two famous mythological tales. The first tells of Gonggong (the ancient water deity) who, after failing in his bid for the throne against Zhuanxu (one of the Five Emperors), angrily crashed into Mount Buzhou in rage. This caused the pillar supporting heaven and earth to break, making the southeastern region of the earth collapse—hence all rivers flow toward the southeast—while the northwestern sky tilted, causing the sun, moon, and stars to move in that direction. However, the author considers these descriptions exaggerated, asserting that celestial movements follow their own subtle patterns understandable only to those versed in astronomy.

The second tale describes the mythical abyss of Guixu east of the Bohai Sea, where all the world's waters converge yet never increase or decrease. Within Guixu stand five sacred mountains: Daiyu, Yuanjiao, Fanghu, Yingzhou, and Penglai. These mountains tower thirty thousand li high, with nine-thousand-li-wide flat summits, each separated by seventy thousand li. Their structures are built of gold and jade, inhabited by pure white animals without blemish, where celestial trees bear fruits of pearls and gemstones—consuming which grants immortality. Countless immortals dwell there, flying daily between mountains to visit one another. Yet these mountains lacked foundations, drifting with the waves and troubling their divine residents. The Heavenly Emperor thus dispatched the sea deity Yuqiang to station fifteen giant sea turtles that took turns supporting the mountains, rotating every sixty thousand years. Later, a giant from the land of Longbo (a kingdom of titans) strode over in a few steps and hooked away six turtles in one cast, causing Daiyu and Yuanjiao mountains to drift north and sink into the polar sea.

聖之播遷者巨億計帝憑怒侵減龍伯之國 使阨侵小龍伯之民使短至伏羲神農時其 國人猶數千丈  歸墟者即尾閭是也八紘八方也九野九  州也純縞純白也珠玕珠玉也峙停也毒  之苦之也禺疆神名也合負以六者同負  而去也趣往也數者數其骨也使阨使隘  狹也五山之仙聖十五鼈之三番龍伯之  釣鼇帝之怒龍伯皆寓言也今佛經多有  此如三十三天香積國西方净土之類是  也 從中州以東四十萬里得僬僥國人長一尺 五寸東北極有人名曰諍人長九寸  龍伯之减小猶長數千丈僬僥之尺五諍  人之九寸長者極長短者極短但言天地  之間變化不常不可以耳目所見者爲定  也 荆之南有㝠靈者以五百歲爲春五百歲爲 秋上古有大椿者以八千歲爲春八千歲爲 秋朽壤之上有菌芝者生於朝死於晦春夏 之月有蠓蚋者因雨而生見陽而死終髮北 之北有溟海者天池也有魚焉其廣數千里 其長稱焉其名爲鯤有鳥焉其名爲鵬翼若 垂天之雲其體稱焉世豈知有此物哉大禹 行而見之伯益知而名之夷堅聞而志之  㝠靈木名也終髮即窮髮也北之又北愈  遠之地也稱去聲其長與其大相稱也翼  大如此身亦稱之則其大可知矣世人所  見者小豈知天地間更有如此廣大之所
Interpretation

This passage describes numerous mythical realms and creatures, showcasing the incredible diversity between heaven and earth.

In ancient times, the inhabitants of Longbo Country (the land of giants in mythology) were originally thousands of zhang tall. After the Heavenly Emperor grew angry and punished them, they gradually diminished in size. Yet even during the eras of Fuxi and Shennong, the people of Longbo still stood thousands of zhang high. In stark contrast were the residents of Jiaoyao Country (the land of dwarves), who measured merely one and a half chi tall. Northeast of them lived beings called "disputers" that stood only nine cun high. This demonstrates how lifeforms between heaven and earth manifest in countless variations that defy our everyday standards.

The text also records various extraordinary life phenomena: in the south grows the Mingling Tree (a mythical divine tree) that considers five hundred years as a single spring and five hundred more as autumn. The great Chun tree of high antiquity measured eight thousand years as one season. On decaying soil, fungi sprout at dawn only to wither by dusk, while tiny flying insects born during spring-summer rains perish upon seeing sunlight. In the northernmost Minghai (the legendary Celestial Pool) swim enormous Kun fish spanning thousands of li wide, alongside the Peng, a divine bird whose wings resemble clouds draping from the heavens. These creatures were so immense that ordinary people could scarcely imagine them—only Yu the Great witnessed them during his imperial tours, with Boyi (the legendary sage minister) naming them and Yijian (the ancient naturalist) recording them.

These accounts collectively illustrate how transformations between heaven and earth are truly boundless, with lifeforms so fantastical they far exceed ordinary understanding. Just as the gargantuan Longbo people contrast sharply with the diminutive Jiaoyao folk, nature presents extremes in all directions—reminding us never to judge the totality of creation by our limited human perspective.

 乎此皆寓言却以禹益實之世言山海經  大荒經皆禹所作亦猶今人言張騫窮天  河也其意但因禹治水行九州伯益爲山  澤之虞故借其名以實其說夷堅亦猶莊  子之齊諧也 江浦之間生麽蟲其名曰焦螟群飛而集於 蚊睫弗相觸也栖宿去來蚊弗覺也離朱子 羽方晝拭眥揚眉而望之弗見其形𧣾(且豸文/尒普弭) (三/切)俞師曠方夜擿耳俛首而聽之弗聞其聲 唯黄帝與容成子居空峒之上同齊三月心 死形廢徐以神視塊然見之若嵩山之阿徐 以氣聽砰然聞之若雷霆之聲  因諍人之論又生麽蟲之說小之而又小  者也𧣾俞亦古之能聽者此即莊子聽之  以耳不若聽之以氣聽之以氣不若聽之  以心之論 吴楚之國有大木焉其名爲櫾碧樹而冬生 實丹而味酸食其皮汁已憤厥之疾齊州珍 之渡淮而北而化爲枳焉鸜鵒不踰濟貉踰 汶則死矣地氣然也雖然形氣異也性鈞已 無相易已生皆全已分皆足已吾何以識其 巨細何以識其脩短何以識其同異哉  櫾橘柚也此數語考工記之說蓋言形氣  之不定所以見造化也隨物而觀則其性  皆均物各一性不得而相易物物各全其  生物物各足其分巨者細者脩者短者皆  造物之理孰爲異孰爲同此數語却自端  正已語終之辭
Interpretation

This passage presents several allegorical tales and Daoist philosophical insights. It begins by noting that ancient texts like the Classic of Mountains and Seas (Shanhaijing), though attributed to legendary figures like Yu the Great and Boyi, are akin to modern claims that Zhang Qian explored the Milky Way—using famous names merely to enhance credibility. Terms like "Yijian" function similarly to "Qi Xie" in Zhuangzi, serving as fictional designations.

The passage then recounts a fable about microscopic creatures called "Jiaoming." These insects are so tiny that whole colonies can alight on a mosquito's eyelash without touching one another, remaining undetected by the host. Even Li Zhu and Ziyu, famed for their keen eyesight, fail to spot them by day, and the sharp-eared Shi Kuang cannot hear them at night. Only the Yellow Emperor (Huangdi) and Rong Chengzi, after three months of purification rituals (zhai) on Mount Kongtong, achieved a meditative state of "mental stillness and physical dissolution" (xin si xing fei). In this state, they perceived the Jiaoming with their spirit (shen), seeing them as towering as mountains and hearing their movements thunderous.

This hyperbolic tale illustrates that true understanding transcends sensory perception, requiring inner attunement. As Zhuangzi teaches, listening with the ears is inferior to listening with Qi (vital energy), which in turn falls short of comprehending with the heart-mind.

The text further cites examples of plants altering traits across regions: the "you tree" (similar to pomelo) from Wu and Chu yields sweet-sour fruit with medicinal bark, prized in Qi. Yet when transplanted north of the Huai River, it becomes the bitter trifoliate orange. Mynah birds cannot cross the Ji River, and raccoon dogs perish beyond the Wen River—all due to shifts in earthly Qi (diqi). Though forms vary, each being's intrinsic nature (xing) remains whole and self-sufficient. Why then distinguish big/small, long/short, or same/different? Such distinctions are mere manifestations of nature's transformations (zaohua). All things possess their unique, irreplaceable completeness.

In closing, the passage emphasizes observing the mutability of form and Qi to grasp creation's mysteries. All natures are equal yet distinct—this is the Dao of spontaneity (ziran). The particle "yi" marks the conclusion.

太形王屋二山方七百里高萬仞本在冀州 之南河陽之北北山愚公者年且九十面山 而居懲山北之塞出入之迂也聚室而謀曰 吾與汝畢力平險指通豫南達于漢陰可乎 雜然相許其妻獻疑曰以君之力曾不能損 魁父之丘如太形王屋何且焉置土石雜曰 投諸渤海之尾隱土之北遂率子孫荷擔者 三夫叩石墾壤箕畚運於渤海之尾鄰人京 城氏之孀妻有遺男始齔跳往助之寒暑易 節始一反焉河曲智叟笑而止之曰甚矣汝 之不慧以殘年餘力曾不能毁山之一毛其 如土石何北山愚公長息曰汝心之固固不 可徹曾不若孀妻弱子雖我之死有子存焉 子又生孫孫又生子子又生子子又生孫子 子孫孫無窮匱也而山不加增何若而不平 河曲智叟亡以應操蛇之神聞之懼其不己 也告之於帝帝感其誠命夸娥氏二子負二 山一厝朔東一厝雍南自此冀之南漢之陰 無隴斷焉  太形即太行也聲相近也指通向南而通  道也隱土北方地名也跳奮而往也易節  一年也不慧不明也固蔽也此章其言似  迂闊然以形容不已之意却甚有味釋氏  言補陀大士初修行時窮苦而無所見將  下山遇人於水邊磨一鐵尺問之曰磨此  何用曰將以爲針大士笑之曰汝豈愚邪  鐵尺可磨爲針乎其人曰今生磨不成後
Interpretation

The Taihang and Wangwu Mountains spanned seven hundred square li, towering ten thousand ren (an ancient unit of measurement, approximately eight chi per ren). Originally located south of Jizhou and north of Heyang, these colossal peaks dominated the landscape.

An elderly man named Yugong, nearing ninety years of age, lived facing the northern slopes of these mountains. Troubled by the obstructed passage and the lengthy detours required to travel around them, he gathered his family and proposed: "Let us join our strength to level these two mountains, opening a direct path to southern Yuzhou that reaches the southern banks of the Han River. What say you?"

His family voiced their agreement, save for his wife, who raised doubts: "With your strength, you couldn’t even remove a small mound like Kuifu—how much less these massive Taihang and Wangwu Mountains? And where would we put all the earth and stones we dig up?" The others chimed in: "We could dump them by the shores of the Bohai Sea, north of Yintu." So Yugong set out with three generations of his descendants capable of carrying baskets. They chiseled rocks and dug earth, hauling the debris in baskets to the Bohai Sea. Their neighbor, the widow of Jingcheng, had a young son just losing his baby teeth, who eagerly skipped along to help. Their journey took a full year to complete each round trip.

An old man from Hequ, known as Wise Elder, laughed and tried to dissuade them: "How foolish you are! With what little strength remains in your aged bones, you couldn’t even destroy a single blade of grass on these mountains—what hope do you have against all this earth and stone?" Yugong sighed deeply and replied: "Your mind is too rigid—even less perceptive than a widow or child. Though I may die, my sons will remain, and they will bear grandsons, who in turn will bear more sons and grandsons. Our descendants are endless, but these mountains will not grow taller. Why fear we cannot level them?" The Wise Elder had no answer.

When the mountain gods heard of this, they grew fearful that Yugong’s family might truly dig without end, so they reported the matter to the Heavenly Emperor. Moved by Yugong’s sincerity, the emperor commanded the two sons of Kua’e (a mythological giant) to carry away the two mountains—one was placed east of Shuofang, the other south of Yongzhou. From then on, no towering peaks stood between southern Jizhou and the southern banks of the Han River.

(Note: "Taihang" is alternately written as "Taixing" in some texts; "Yintu" refers to a northern region; "changing seasons" signifies the passage of a year; "unwise" denotes a lack of understanding. Though this tale may seem exaggerated, it vividly illustrates the spirit of perseverance. Like the Buddhist parable of the Bodhisattva who saw a man grinding an iron rod by a riverbank, vowing to sharpen it into a needle—though seemingly absurd, it conveys the profound truth of steadfast determination.)

 生亦磨不成大士大悟再歸補陀而後成  道似此之言甚迂某嘗以爲有味有益於  學者若人皆存此心何事不可爲何學不  可成也東坡曰徐徐而爲之十年之後何  事不立但恐此意不堅行之不力耳東坡  此語似甚淺近若研究得來堯之競競舜  之業業湯之又日新文王之純亦不已即  此一念也操蛇神夸娥氏皆神名也無隴  斷者言其地皆平雖小坡垤亦無之也 夸父不量力欲追日影逐之於隅谷之際渴 欲得飮赴飮河渭河渭不足將走北飮大澤 未至道渴而死棄其杖尸膏肉所浸生鄧林 鄧林彌廣數千里焉  隅谷日入處也夸父之杖化爲鄧林鄧林  之廣猶數千里夸父亦龍伯之類爾此必  古來相傳有此怪異之說故清虚之徒並  取以入其書以爲大言之資耳 大禹曰六合之間四海之内照之以日月經 之以星辰紀之以四時要之以太歲神靈所 生其物其形或夭或壽唯聖人能通其道夏 革曰然則亦有不待神靈而生不待陰陽而 形不待日月而明不待殺戮而夭不待將迎 而壽不待五穀而食不待繒纊而衣不待舟 車而行其道自然非聖人之所通也  夏革既與湯問答此又與禹問答兩夏革  邪一夏革邪一夏革則當有千百歲之壽  矣神靈所生即日月陰陽太歲是也上章  以神靈結語下章以神靈起語可見文勢
Interpretation

This passage presents several Daoist parables and philosophical reflections. First, it discusses the principle of cultivation for attaining the Dao: human life is like sharpening a blade—one cannot rush the process. Just as a Great Master (cultivator) must repeatedly contemplate to realize the Dao, Su Dongpo also remarked, "Proceed gradually—what cannot be accomplished in ten years?" This spirit of perseverance aligns with the diligence of ancient sage-kings like Yao and Shun, Tang of Shang's "daily renewal," and King Wen of Zhou's "purity without cease."

Next, it recounts the myth of Kuafu chasing the sun: Kuafu, overestimating his strength, pursued the sun to the valley of sunset (Yugu), where he was overcome with thirst. After draining the Yellow River and Wei River, he sought to drink from the great northern marsh but perished of thirst along the way. His staff transformed into the Deng Forest (peach grove), spanning thousands of miles. The author suggests such myths are ancient tales of wonder preserved in Daoist texts like the Liezi as allegorical material.

Finally, through a dialogue between Yu the Great and Xiage, it explores the Dao of nature: Yu states that all things in heaven and earth are governed by the sun, moon, stars, and seasonal changes, and only sages comprehend these patterns. Xiage adds that some phenomena exist beyond these natural laws—their very being embodies the Dao's spontaneity (Ziran), which even sages struggle to fully grasp. Notably, the text observes that Xiage, who converses with both Tang of Shang and the earlier Yu in the Liezi, may be a Daoist adept who lived for centuries.

(Note: The "Tai Sui" mentioned refers to a hypothetical celestial body in ancient astronomy; "Kua’e Shi" is a mythical giant; the "Deng Forest," or peach grove, symbolizes longevity in Daoism.)

 禹曰有形之物或夭或壽皆有道存焉唯  聖人則通知之革又曰亦有不待陰陽日  月而生者石卵石子何假陰陽之氣土蟻  地龍何假日月之明朝菌蟪蛄豈殺戮而  夭松栢南山豈導迎而壽竊脂剖葦豈待  五穀而飽牛馬之類豈待繒絮而暖飛禽  之類豈待舟車而行此又自然而然非常  理可推雖聖人亦不得而盡通知之太歳  主歲之神也今日者亦用此則自古有之  矣此意蓋言天下之事有可以常理推者  又不可以常理推者此所以爲造化之妙 禹之治水土也迷而失塗謬之一國濱北海 之北不知距齊州幾千萬里其國名曰終北 不知際畔之所齊限無風雨霜露不生鳥獸 蟲魚草木之類四方悉平周以喬陟當國之 中有山山名壺嶺狀若甔甄頂有口狀若員 環名曰滋穴有水涌出名曰神瀵臭過蘭椒 味過醪醴一源分爲四埒注於山下經營一 國亡不悉徧土氣和亡札厲人性婉而從物 不競不爭柔心而弱骨不驕不忌長幼儕居 不君不臣男女雜游不媒不聘縁水而居不 耕不稼土氣温適不織不衣百年而死不夭 不病其民孳阜亡數有喜樂亡衰老哀苦其 俗好聲相携而迭謡終曰不輟音饑惓則飲 神瀵力志和平過則醉經旬乃醒沐浴神瀵 膚色脂澤香氣經旬乃歇  終北窮北也齊止也限極也其際畔無止
Interpretation

Yu the Great said that all physical things in the world, whether short-lived or long-lived, contain within them the principles of nature. Only sages can fully comprehend these truths. He further stated that some forms of life exist without relying on the dual energies of Yin-Yang or the movements of the sun and moon—such as pebbles and stones within rocks. Do they need the Qi of Yin-Yang? Ants and earthworms in the soil—do they depend on the light of the sun and moon? The mushrooms that sprout at dawn and wither by dusk, or the cicadas of summer—are their short lives due to being killed? The pines and cypresses of the southern mountains—do they achieve longevity through guidance? Birds that feed on fat and insects that gnaw on reeds—do they wait for the ripening of the five grains? Animals like oxen and horses—do they rely on silk or cotton for warmth? Creatures that fly—do they need carts or boats to travel? These are all phenomena formed naturally, beyond the scope of conventional reasoning. Even sages cannot fully grasp them.

The Grand Duke (an ancient deity governing the year) presides over the passage of time, and people still use this concept today, showing that such understanding has existed since antiquity. The point here is: some things in the world can be explained by common principles, while others transcend them—this is precisely the profound mystery of the transformations of heaven and earth.

While regulating the waters and lands, Yu once lost his way and mistakenly entered a country near the northernmost reaches of the Northern Sea, countless thousands of miles from the Central Plains. This land, called the Kingdom of Ultimate North, had no boundaries or limits, no wind, rain, frost, or dew, and no birds, beasts, insects, fish, or plants. The land was flat on all sides, with a central mountain shaped like an overturned jar, called Mount Huling. At its summit was a circular opening called the Nourishing Cavern, from which flowed a miraculous spring called the Divine Fountain. Its fragrance surpassed that of orchids and pepper, and its sweetness exceeded fine wine. The waters divided into four streams that spread throughout the land, where the climate was mild and free of plagues. The people were gentle and harmonious, neither contentious nor aggressive, with soft hearts and pliant bones, free from arrogance or envy. The young and old lived together as equals, with no distinction between ruler and subject; men and women mingled freely, with no need for matchmakers or betrothal gifts. The people dwelled along the waters, neither plowing nor planting; as the land was warm, they neither wove nor wore clothes. They lived to a hundred years and died naturally, with no premature deaths or illnesses. The population flourished endlessly, knowing only joy without the sorrows of aging or sickness. Their custom was to love music, spending their days hand in hand, singing in turns without tiring. When hungry or thirsty, they drank from the Divine Fountain—drinking too much would intoxicate them for ten days before they awoke. Bathing in its waters made their skin smooth and fragrant, the scent lingering for over ten days.

"Ultimate North" signifies the northernmost extreme, where "Qi" means the limit and "boundary" is nonexistent—this land had no borders or end.

 極也喬陟高山也壺嶺亦方壺員嶠之類  甔甀瓦器滋穴之水名曰神瀵出於一源  分於四畔埒猶際也經營一國言此水遶  一國也婉而從物順也弱骨不力爭也孳  阜孳生也阜盛也此章自輕旬乃歇以上  言禹之所見也 周穆王北遊過其國三年忘歸既反周室慕 其國𢠳然自失不進酒肉不召嬪御者數月 乃復  因穆王八駿之說又於此添作一證 管仲勉齊桓公因遊遼口俱之其國幾尅舉 隰朋諫曰君舍齊國之廣人民之衆山川之 觀殖物之阜禮義之盛章服之美妖靡盈庭 忠良滿朝肆咤則徒卒百萬視撝則諸侯從 命亦奚羡於彼而棄齊國之社稷從戎夷之 國乎此仲父之耄奈何從之桓公乃止以隰 朋之言告管仲仲曰此固非朋之所及也臣 恐彼國之不可升之也齊國之富奚戀隰朋 之言奚顧  又因齊國遵海而南倣於琅琊之事添此  一段說話幾尅舉者言幾乎尅日而欲舉  行也肆咤者肆意而叱咤也視撝者言隨  目所視而指麾之也彼國之不可升者言  但恐求至而不可得也此等言意亦不過  謂天地之外更有勝於人之耳目所見者  而已 南國之人祝髮而祼北國之人鞨巾而裘中 國之人冠冕而裳九土所資或農或商或田 或漁如冬裘夏葛水舟陸車默而得之性而 成之
Interpretation

The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing (Scripture of Perfect Virtue in the Void) presents several narratives and discourses about distant, wondrous lands.

The first section describes extraordinary sights witnessed by Yu the Great: towering peaks like Fanghu and Yuanjiao (legendary mountains of immortals), and a miraculous spring (shenfen) whose single source divided into four streams encircling the entire realm. The people there were gentle and non-contentious, living in harmony where all things flourished abundantly.

The second part recounts King Mu of Zhou's journey: during his northern expedition, he encountered a marvelous kingdom where he lingered for three years, forgetting to return to his court. Even after coming back, he remained wistful for months, losing appetite and abstaining from female companionship. The narrative invokes the legend of King Mu's Eight Chargers to authenticate this account.

The third segment features a dialogue between Guan Zhong and Duke Huan of Qi. When the Duke contemplated abandoning Qi for that exotic land, Guan Zhong dissuaded him by extolling Qi's vast territory, prosperous culture, and military might, questioning why one would envy barbarian regions. Privately, however, Guan Zhong suggested the place might transcend mortal reach—hinting it could be a celestial realm beyond ordinary perception.

The concluding passage compares regional customs: southerners with cropped hair and bare torsos, northerners in fur-lined hooded coats, and central plains dwellers wearing ceremonial caps and robes. Different lands yield different products; some people farm while others trade, all following natural rhythms—just as one wears furs in winter and hemp in summer, boats on water and carts on land. These represent spontaneous ways of living in accordance with the Dao.

(Note: "Fanghu and Yuanjiao" refer to mythical immortal mountains; "shenfen" denotes a magical water source; "Eight Chargers" were King Mu's divine steeds; "Zhongfu" was Duke Huan's honorific for Guan Zhong)

 此語吾書中亦有之蓋中國之外質性不  同衣食或異隨其生而樂之此無他皆欲  廣人之所見耳 越之東有輒休之國其長子生則鮮而食之 謂之宜弟其大父死負其大母而棄之曰鬼 妻不可與同居處楚之南有炎人之國其親 戚死㱙(與□/同)其肉而棄之然後埋其骨廼成 爲孝子秦之西有儀渠(文/康)之國者其親戚死 聚柴積而焚之燻則煙上謂之登遐然後成 爲孝子此上而爲政下以爲俗而未足爲異 也  輒休炎人儀渠皆國名也㱙者割也此章  之言墨子亦有之兩漢夷狄傳晋之載記  亦間有一二事相類列子之意不過曰天  地之内國土不同風俗各異豈必皆如中  國而後爲美我之所好安知非彼之所惡  哉 孔子東游見兩小兒辯闘問其故一兒曰我 以日始出時去人近而日中時遠也一兒以 日初出遠而日中時近也一兒曰日初出大 如車蓋及日中則如盤盂此不爲遠者小而 近者大乎一兒曰日初出則滄滄凉凉及其 日中如探湯此不爲近者熱而遠者凉乎孔 子不能决也兩小兒笑曰孰爲汝多知乎  兩小兒之論與晋太子長安與日近遠之  說相類此章之意蓋言遠近是非不可以  一理定也 均天下之至理也連於形物亦然均髮均縣 輕重而髮絶髮不均也均也其絶也莫絶人
Interpretation

This passage discusses two main themes: the diversity of customs across different regions, and the relativity of human understanding.

First, it describes strikingly different funeral customs among various nations: In the eastern land of Zhexiu, people eat their firstborn son believing this ensures the health of subsequent children, and abandon their wives after elders' deaths, claiming one shouldn't live with a "ghost wife." The southern Yanren people of Chu strip flesh from deceased relatives before burial, considering bone interment alone as true filial piety. Western Yiqu inhabitants of Qin cremate their dead on pyres, viewing rising smoke as the soul's celestial ascent. What rulers consider governance, commoners practice as custom—neither perspective being inherently strange.

Through these examples, the text illustrates how customs vary across Heaven and Earth, cautioning against viewing Central Plains traditions as uniquely superior. What we cherish might repel others—a perfectly natural principle.

Next, the Confucian anecdote about two children debating the sun's distance demonstrates cognitive relativity: One child argues morning's large sun (chariot-canopy sized) proves its proximity compared to noon's smaller (plate-sized) appearance; the other counters that morning's coolness versus noon's heat indicates the opposite. Even Confucius couldn't adjudicate, mirroring the Jin dynasty prince's debate about whether Chang'an or the sun lay farther—showing judgments of distance and truth resist singular standards.

Finally, the text elevates "equilibrium" (jun) as the universe's supreme principle, illustrated by suspending heavy weights with hair strands: When force distributes evenly, even massive loads won't snap the hair; uneven distribution breaks seemingly light burdens. This underscores balance's fundamental importance.

以爲不然自有知其然者也  此章提起一均字言均天下之至理凡物  之有形者亦然連猶凡也形物有形之物  也亦然者理如是而物亦如是也懸與髮  均則雖髮可以縣故曰均髮均縣若物與  髮有輕有重則髮必斷絶其所以斷絶者  不均也故曰輕重而髮絶不均也若輕重  均平則雖欲絶而不絶故曰均也其絶也  莫絶此一句自妙均也是一句其絶也莫  絶是一句此即公孫龍髮引千鈞之論人  皆以爲不然自有知其然者言世人則不  知其然知道者則知其然也 詹何以獨繭絲爲綸芒鍼爲鈎荆蓧爲竿剖 粒爲餌引盈車之魚於百仞之淵汩流之中 綸不絶鈎不伸竿不撓楚王聞而異之召問 其故詹何曰臣聞先大夫之言蒲且子之弋 也弱弓纖繳乗風振之連雙鶬於青雲之際 用心專動手均也臣因其事放而學釣五年 始盡其道當臣之臨河持竿心無雜慮唯魚 之念投綸沈釣手無輕重物莫能亂魚見臣 之鈎餌猶沉埃聚沫吞之不疑所以能以弱 制彊以輕致重也大王治國誠能若此則天 下可運於一握將亦奚事哉楚王曰善  詹何之釣蒲且子之弋與傴僂丈人之承  蜩㫖意相類蓋言治國治天下若平其心  無强無弱無輕無重則弱可以制强輕可  以制重此即老子柔能勝剛之論也 魯公扈趙齊嬰二人有疾同請扁鵲求治扁
Interpretation

The passage illustrates the core Daoist concept of "equilibrium" through several parables. The first analogy compares it to suspending heavy weights with a single hair: when weight is evenly distributed, even something as fine as a strand can bear immense force; yet once balance is lost, even the strongest material will snap. This echoes Gongsun Long’s theory of "a hair lifting a thousand jun" — while ordinary people dismiss it as impossible, those who grasp its principle understand its feasibility.

Next comes the story of Zhan He fishing. Using a single silk thread as his line, a slender needle as his hook, and a thin bamboo rod, he managed to haul in a cart-sized fish. When King Chu inquired about his secret, Zhan He likened it to Pu Juizi shooting down two flying birds with a light bow and fine string, emphasizing that the key lay in "focused intent and evenly applied force." After five years of disciplined practice, he achieved a state of undistracted concentration and precise control, making the bait drift like dust or foam in the water — so natural that the great fish swallowed it without suspicion. This demonstrates how weakness can master strength, and lightness can overcome heaviness. Govern a state with such principles, and the world becomes effortlessly manageable.

The passage also alludes to Gonghu of Lu and Qiying of Zhao seeking the famed physician Bian Que for treatment, hinting that healing and statecraft share the same logic: both require balancing Yin-Yang. These stories collectively expound Laozi’s teaching that "the soft and weak vanquish the hard and strong." When the mind remains serene, free from rigid distinctions between strength and weakness, gentleness can indeed subdue force. Like the hunchbacked old man effortlessly catching cicadas, success lies in focused tranquility.

鵲治之既同愈謂公扈齊嬰曰汝曩之所疾 自外而干府藏者固藥石之所已今有偕生 之疾與體偕長今爲汝攻之何如二人曰願 先聞其驗扁鵲謂公扈曰汝志彊而氣弱故 足於謀而寡於斷齊嬰志弱而氣强故少於 慮而傷於專若换汝之心則均於善矣扁鵲 遂飲二人毒酒迷死三日剖胸探心易而置 之投以神藥既悟如初二人辭歸於是公扈 反齊嬰之室而有其妻子妻子弗識齊嬰亦 反公扈之室有其妻子妻子亦弗識二室因 相與訟求辯於扁鵲扁鵲辯其所由訟乃已  此章形容心禀於氣人有不得而自由者  其言亦有深味雖似迂闊而不迂闊若明  道曰一百四病皆由他心須由我始得此  語又高然列子之喻氣質之性之心也明  道之言理性也必以理性化氣質之性而  後心可自由 瓠巴鼓琴而鳥舞魚躍鄭師文聞之棄家從 師襄游柱指鈞弦三年不成章師襄曰子可 以歸矣師文舍其琴嘆曰文非弦之不能鈞 非章之不能成文所存者不在弦所志者不 在聲内不得於心外不應於氣故不敢發手 而動弦且小假之以觀其後無幾何復見師 襄師襄曰子之琴何如師文曰得之矣請嘗 試之於是當春而叩商絃以召南吕凉風忽 至草木成實及秋而叩角絃以激夾鍾温風 徐回草木發榮當夏而叩羽絃以召黄鍾霜
Interpretation

This story recounts the miraculous tale of the renowned physician Bian Que performing a heart-swapping operation between Gong Hu and Qi Ying. Both men sought treatment from Bian Que, who discerned that their ailments weren't physical but temperamental—Gong Hu was thoughtful yet indecisive, while Qi Ying acted impulsively without strategy. Using an anesthetic, Bian Que rendered them unconscious for three days and exchanged their hearts. Upon awakening, their personalities had switched: Gong Hu returned to Qi Ying's home claiming his wife, and Qi Ying went to Gong Hu's household doing the same, causing great confusion. Only after Bian Que explained the situation was the dispute resolved.

Through this exaggerated narrative, the story illustrates how human temperament is shaped by innate constitution (Qi) and is difficult to change voluntarily. As the Song Dynasty philosopher Cheng Hao observed, all suffering originates in the heart-mind (Xin), and true healing must begin there. The Liezi uses this parable to address the nature of innate temperament (Xing), while Cheng Hao emphasizes rational cultivation—only by guiding temperament with reason can one attain genuine spiritual freedom.

The subsequent account describes the musician Hu Ba, whose zither playing could make birds and beasts dance. Inspired, Zheng State's Shi Wen sought him as a teacher but failed to produce harmonious music for three years. Dismissed by his master, Shi Wen set aside his instrument and lamented: "It's not that the strings are untuned or the compositions unmastered, but that my heart lacks enlightenment, and my Qi cannot resonate with the zither." Through continued dedicated practice, he eventually grasped the Dao of music—playing the Shang mode in spring could summon autumn winds to make plants fruit, while playing the Jue mode in autumn could invoke spring breezes to revive withered trees. This demonstrates that true artistry requires unity of heart-mind (Xin), vital energy (Qi), and technique. When inner cultivation reaches perfection, even nature responds in harmony.

雪交下川池暴沍及冬而叩徴絃以激蕤賔 陽光熾烈堅冰立散將終命宫而總四絃則 景風翔慶雲浮甘露降醴泉涌師襄乃撫心 高蹈曰微矣子之彈也雖師曠之清角鄒衍 之吹律亡以加矣彼將挾琴執管而從子之 後耳  不成章者言未能成一曲也柱指安指也  鈞絃調絃也不在絃不在聲者心未安也  得於心應於手則遺其器也未能如此所  以不敢動絃也小假者小寬也觀其後看  此後如何也當春爲秋聲而秋氣應當秋  爲春聲而春氣應當夏爲冬聲而冬氣應  當冬爲夏聲而夏氣應商弦屬秋角弦屬  春羽弦屬冬徵弦屬夏官爲中聲故和氣  應琴有五弦一弦主一聲此曰叩某弦者  非調其一而廢其四蓋某曲以商爲主某  曲以角爲主也此意蓋言音聲之妙可以  通造化而已師文之見師襄其言似在一  日之間安得通四時而並叩並應乎以此  而觀可知其爲寓言也微矣子之彈者言  子之彈琴微妙極矣清角樂名也挾琴執  管而從子後者言彼師曠鄒衍當從學於  汝也 薛譚學謳於秦青未窮青之技自謂盡之遂 辭歸秦青弗止餞於郊衢撫節悲歌聲振林 木響遏行雲薛譚乃謝求反終身不敢言歸 秦青顧謂其友曰昔韓娥東之齊匱糧過雍 門鬻歌假食既去而餘音遶梁欐三日不絶
Interpretation

This passage recounts two marvelous tales about the power of music.

The first story describes the wondrous states achieved by Shi Wen when playing the qin. When he played the zhi mode (one of the ancient five tones) in winter, the sunlight suddenly grew intensely hot, causing solid ice to melt instantly. When he played the gong mode (the fundamental tone among the five), gentle breezes arose, auspicious clouds appeared, sweet dew descended, and sweet springs bubbled forth. His teacher Shi Xiang marveled, saying: "Your qin artistry has reached such perfection that even Shi Kuang's famous qingjiao mode and Zou Yan's (Yin-Yang master) flute techniques cannot compare—they would have to come holding their instruments to learn from you."

The text explains the Dao of qin playing: poor performance stems from an unsettled mind; fingers must press the strings steadily and tune them precisely. True artistry lies not in the strings or sounds themselves, but in the perfect coordination of heart and hand that transcends the instrument. Playing seasonally appropriate tones produces miraculous effects: performing autumn modes in spring summons autumnal qi, winter modes in summer brings wintry energy, and so forth. The five tones correspond to the seasons: shang mode belongs to autumn, jue to spring, yu to winter, zhi to summer, while gong harmonizes the qi of all four seasons.

The second tale tells of Xue Tan learning singing from Qin Qing. Before completing his training, Xue fancied he had mastered the art and prepared to leave. Qin didn't detain him, but when bidding farewell at the outskirts, he beat time while singing a mournful melody that shook the forest trees and resonated through the clouds. Only then did Xue realize his inadequacy, begging to continue his studies—he never again spoke of returning home. Qin later told friends: "When Han E (the legendary singer) journeyed to Qi and sang at Yongmen Gate for food, her voice lingered around the beams for three days after she departed." Both stories illustrate how music, when perfected, can resonate with Heaven and Earth to produce miraculous transformations.

左右以其人弗去過逆旅逆旅人辱之韓娥 因曼聲哀哭一里老幼悲愁垂涕相對三曰 不食遽而追之娥還復爲曼聲長歌一里老 幼喜躍抃舞弗能自禁忘向之悲也乃厚賂 發之故雍門之人至今善歌哭效娥之遺聲  撫節按拍也匱乏也鬻歌假食賣歌以求  食也發之謝而送之也此語亦有見於孟  子者因師文鼔琴之說又及謳者之事而  併記之皆言工技之能神妙也如此技能  如此則學道者豈不有至神至妙之事乎  此又其言外之意也 伯牙善鼓琴鍾子期善聽伯牙鼓琴志在登 高山鍾子期曰善哉峨峨兮若泰山志在流 水鍾子期曰善哉洋洋兮若江河伯牙所念 鍾子期必得之伯牙游於泰山之陰卒逢暴 雨止於岩下心悲乃援琴而鼓之初爲霖雨 之操更造崩山之音曲每奏鍾子期輒窮其 趣伯牙乃舍琴而歎曰善哉善哉子之聽夫 志想象猶吾心也吾於何逃聲哉  霖雨崩山皆琴曲名也志所想象言子期  也謂其心與己心同也聲出於心汝既心  與已同宜乎知其聲也於何逃者言不可  隱也此必古來相傳之說取而入其書蓋  言天下之事無精無粗皆有造於神妙者 周穆王西巡狩越崑崙不至弇山反還未及 中國道有獻工人名偃師穆王薦之問曰若 有何能偃師曰臣唯命所試然臣已有所造
Interpretation

This passage recounts several miraculous tales about music and craftsmanship, illustrating how extraordinary effects can be achieved when skills reach their pinnacle.

First is the story of Han E’s singing. After being humiliated at an inn, Han E wept with a lingering, sorrowful voice, moving the entire village to tears and leaving them unable to eat for three days. Later, when she returned and sang a joyful tune, the villagers became so elated that they danced with delight, completely forgetting their previous grief. To this day, the people of Yongmen (a place name) excel at singing, having preserved and imitated Han E’s vocal techniques.

Next is the tale of Bo Ya playing the qin. When Bo Ya envisioned towering mountains while playing, Zhong Ziqi remarked, "Majestic as Mount Tai." When Bo Ya imagined flowing water, Zhong Ziqi said, "Vast as the great rivers." When Bo Ya performed the Rainstorm Melody (Linyu Cao) or the Collapsing Mountain Sound (Bengshan Yin), Zhong Ziqi grasped the full meaning behind each piece. Bo Ya marveled that Zhong Ziqi understood his heart so completely—no musical expression could be hidden from him.

Finally, the passage mentions King Mu of Zhou encountering a craftsman named Yan Shi during his western travels. Yan Shi claimed he could create all manner of wondrous objects and was willing to undergo any test to prove his skill.

These stories all demonstrate that when an art or craft reaches a divine level of mastery, it can produce effects beyond the ordinary. The underlying implication is clear: if music and craftsmanship can achieve such marvels, how much more profound must be the realm pursued by Daoist cultivators? This is the deeper meaning concealed within these tales.

願王先觀之穆王曰日以俱來吾與若俱觀 之越日偃師謁見王王薦之曰若與偕來者 何人對曰臣之所造能倡者穆王驚視之趣 步俯仰信人也巧夫鎮其頤則歌合律捧其 手則舞應節千變萬化唯意所適王以爲實 人也與盛姬内御並觀之技將終倡者瞬其 目而招王之左右侍妾王大怒立欲誅偃師 偃師大懾立剖散倡者以示王皆傳會革木 膠漆白黑丹青之所爲王諦料之内則肝膽 心肺脾腎腸胃外則筋骨支節皮毛齒髮皆 假物也而無不畢具者合會復如初見王試 廢其心則口不能言廢其肝則曰不能視廢 其腎則足不能步穆王始悦而歎曰人之巧 乃可與造化者同功乎詔貳車載之以歸夫 班輸之雲梯墨翟之飛鳶自謂能之極也弟 子東門賈禽滑釐聞偃師之巧以告二子二 子終身不敢語藝而時執規矩  弇山又在崑崙之西薦之進之也漢書搢  紳搢亦作薦日以俱來明日與同來也趣  步俯仰皆實如人然信實也巧夫歎其工  能之巧也鎮擪也擪其口而使之歌則皆  合律捧其手而使之舞則應節始者以爲  實似人既乆則宛如實人也盛姬羣多之  姬也招戲之也諦審也料點檢之也合會  復如初既剖散而復合其歌舞又如初見  也木人而能行能舞猶可也聲何從出此  意蓋言人之一身亦是假合而成目應於
Interpretation

King Mu of Zhou said to Yanshi: "Tomorrow bring your creation with you, and we shall admire it together." The next day, Yanshi arrived with his mechanical performer. King Mu asked, "Who is this accompanying you?" Yanshi replied, "This is an artificial entertainer I crafted, capable of singing and dancing."

To the king's astonishment, this "person" walked, sat, and moved indistinguishably from a real human. When its chin was pressed, it sang in perfect rhythm; when its arms were raised, it danced in harmony with the melody—every movement fluidly followed the performer's will. King Mu initially believed it to be a living person and summoned his favorite consort Shengji and palace maidens to watch the performance.

Near the act's conclusion, the mechanical figure suddenly winked flirtatiously at the royal concubines. Enraged, King Mu ordered Yanshi executed. In terror, Yanshi immediately disassembled the figure before the king—revealing it was merely constructed from leather, wood, lacquer, and pigments. Upon close inspection, the king saw internally crafted replicas of liver, gallbladder, heart, and lungs, while externally it had simulated tendons, joints, and hair—every component meticulously complete. When reassembled, the figure performed exactly as before.

The king experimented by removing the "heart"—whereupon the figure fell silent; extracting the "liver" rendered it blind; taking out the "kidneys" left it unable to walk. Only then did King Mu's anger turn to delight, exclaiming, "How can human artifice rival the Creator's work!" He then commanded the figure be transported to the palace in a secondary carriage.

The record further notes that even renowned craftsmen like Gongshu Ban (Lu Ban)—creator of cloud-ladders—and Mozi—maker of wooden kites—when their disciples Dongmen Jia and Qin Guli later reported Yanshi's achievement, these masters never again boasted of their skills, devoting their remaining years to quietly perfecting foundational techniques.

(Note: Mount Yan mentioned in the text lies west of Kunlun Mountain. "Presenting it" implies offering tribute, while "a scholar's attire" suggests the figure's refined craftsmanship mimicked aristocratic realism. Through the mechanical man's construction, the passage metaphorically illustrates the Daoist philosophy of "form and spirit in harmony," implying the human body itself is but a temporary coalescence of elemental forces.)

 肝足應於腎口應於心何嘗由我釋氏四  大之說亦類此人之巧乃能奪造化況造  化之巧乎貳車者副車也雲梯攻城之具  也飛鳶亦木爲之也此與雪峰木毬相類  自謂能之極者言般輸墨翟自謂極巧比  之偃師又不足言技能矣所以終身不敢  自稱其藝時乎而執規矩者謂輪翟二子  皆廢棄工技不敢復爲時乎不得已而後  執之也東門賈禽滑釐兩人名也 甘蠅古之善射者彀弓而獸伏鳥下弟子名 飛衛學射於甘蠅而巧過其師紀昌者又學 射於飛衛飛衛曰爾先學不瞬而後可言射 矣紀昌歸偃卧其妻之機下以目承牽挺二 年之後雖錐末倒眥而不瞬也以告飛衛飛 衛曰未也亞學視而後可視小如大視微如 著而後告我昌以氂懸虱於牖南面而望之 旬日之間浸大也三年之後如車輪焉以睹 餘物皆丘山也乃以燕角之弧朔蓬之簳射 之貫虱之心而懸不絶以告飛衛飛衛高蹈 拊膺曰汝得之矣  牽挺機下之挺隨足上下者也錐末雖倒  眥而不瞬孟子所謂不目逃也亞學亞次  也更也使其更學視也虱既如車輪則他  物皆如丘山矣燕角之弧以燕之角爲弓  朔蓬之簳以朔之蓬爲幹也此弓矢之精  也視虱如輪而後可射此精藝者必然如  扁鵲學醫隔墻而見人尤異矣此世間所  有之事不精於學者不可與議也
Interpretation

This passage recounts several parables about skill cultivation, emphasizing that only through intensely focused training can one attain extraordinary mastery.

The text mentions correspondences between human organs: the liver corresponds to the kidneys, and the mouth corresponds to the heart. These connections are not artificially imposed but arise naturally. Similar concepts exist in Buddhism's "Four Elements" (earth, water, fire, wind) theory. Human ingenuity can surpass the workings of nature, yet nature's craftsmanship is already profoundly exquisite.

Several examples of remarkable skill are then cited: the "èr chē" (secondary chariot), "yún tī" (siege ladders), and "fēi yuān" (wooden flying kites)—ingenious inventions akin to the "snow peak wooden ball." Though master craftsmen like Lu Ban and Mozi believed their skills had reached perfection, compared to the legendary artisan Yanshi, they still fell short. Thus, they never dared boast of their abilities in their lifetimes.

The passage details the story of Ji Chang learning archery: Fei Wei, a disciple of the ancient archery master Gan Ying, taught Ji Chang. Fei Wei first demanded Ji Chang master the foundational skill of "not blinking." For two years, Ji Chang lay beneath a loom, staring at the treadle until even an awl pricking his eyelid wouldn't make him flinch. Next, Fei Wei had him practice "seeing the small as large"—tying a louse to a window with yak hair and gazing at it daily. After three years, the louse appeared as large as a chariot wheel, while other objects loomed like mountains. Finally, Ji Chang shot through the louse's heart with a swallow-horn bow and northern reed arrow without breaking the hair. Overjoyed, Fei Wei slapped his chest and exclaimed, "You've grasped the essence!"

These stories illustrate that mastering a skill requires disciplined, step-by-step training in fundamentals. Just as the physician Bian Que could "see people through walls" after rigorous study, only by achieving such intense focus can one become a true expert. Those unwilling to endure this arduous process will never comprehend such heights of mastery.

紀昌既盡衛之術計天下之敵己者一人而 已乃謀殺飛衛相遇於野二人交射中路矢 鋒相觸而墜於地而塵不揚飛衛之矢先窮 紀昌遺一矢既發飛衛以棘刺之端扞之而 無差焉於是二子泣而投弓相拜於塗請爲 父子尅臂以誓不得告術於人  交射中路者於塗中互相射也彼此之矢  相觸而落於地塵亦不起亦其平落地也  以棘刺之端而扞其來矢亦相值而無差  池也尅臂者削其臂以爲識而誓也此說  似迂向游淮識軒路分者其年已近七十  矣春秋大閲第一籌年年得之渠嘗云初  收王辛時相遇於六安山間王辛執弓欲  射之軒之手中只有一條短木槍呼辛而  謂之曰我在此許汝發三矢若射我不中  汝即降我我同汝見趙制置管取做官人  辛發三矢皆爲木槍所擊而落地辛遂拜  之王辛後爲光州武定都統及某至安豐  有王辛舊將亦言此事與軒語一同軒忘  其名矣然則紀昌飛衛之相射豈得謂誣  乎 造父之師曰泰豆氏造父之始從習御也執 禮甚卑泰豆三年不告造父執禮愈謹乃告 之曰古詩言良弓之子必先爲箕良冶之子 必先爲裘汝先觀吾趣趣如吾然後六轡可 持六馬可御造父曰唯命所從泰豆乃立木 爲塗僅可容足計步而置履之而行趣走往 還無跌失也造父學之三日盡其巧泰豆歎
Interpretation

After Ji Chang mastered Fei Wei's archery skills, he believed only Fei Wei remained as his equal in the world. Thus, he sought to eliminate him. When the two met in the wilderness for an archery duel, their arrows collided midair and fell without even stirring dust. Fei Wei exhausted his arrows first, while Ji Chang had one remaining. When Ji Chang loosed his final shot, Fei Wei deflected it perfectly with a thorn tip, not a hair's breadth off. Moved to tears, they cast aside their bows, embraced on the road, and swore a father-son bond. They cut their arms to seal an oath, vowing never to pass on their peerless skills.

The phrase "exchanging shots on the road" describes their arrows meeting and falling simultaneously, leaving no dust unsettled. Deflecting an arrow with a thorn tip with flawless precision demonstrates astonishing mastery. "Cutting arms" refers to the blood oath. Though the tale seems fantastical, a man named Xiang Youhuai knew an elder called Xuan Lufen, who in his seventies still won first place yearly in seasonal military archery contests. Xuan recalled encountering Wang Xin in Liu'an Mountain as a youth. When Wang drew his bow, Xuan—armed only with a short wooden spear—challenged: "I'll stand still for three shots. Miss, and you submit." Wang's three arrows were all knocked aside, forcing his surrender. Later, as Guangzhou's military commander, Wang's former subordinates corroborated the story exactly as Xuan told it. Thus, Ji Chang and Fei Wei's duel may not be fictional.

Consider also Zaofu learning charioteering from Master Taidou. For three years, Zaofu showed utmost reverence while Taidou taught him nothing substantial. Only when Zaofu redoubled his humility did Taidou say: "As the ancient verse goes—the bowmaker's son first learns basket-weaving, the blacksmith's son begins with leather-sewing. Watch my walking. Master this, and you'll command six reins to steer six steeds." Taidou then erected narrow wooden stakes spaced precisely for footsteps, traversing them effortlessly. Zaofu mastered the technique in three days, leaving Taidou awestruck.

曰子何其敏也得之捷乎凡所御者亦如此 也曩汝之行得之於足應之於心推於御也 齊輯乎轡銜之際而急緩乎脣吻之和正度 於胸臆之中而執節乎掌握之間内得於中 心而外合於馬志是故能進退履繩而旋曲 中規矩取道致遠而氣力有餘誠得其術也 得之於銜應之於轡得之於轡應之於手得 之於手應之於心則不以目視不以策驅心 閑體正六轡不亂而二十四蹄所投無差迴 旋進退莫不中節然後輿輪之外可使無餘 轍馬蹄之外可使無餘地未嘗覺山谷之嶮 原隰之夷視之一也吾術窮矣汝其識之  泰豆亦古之善御者也裘箕古語也已見  學記學弓先學箕皆竹器也冶攻金也與  裘何預此語素難通然考工記有裘氏不  知所主何事此官既缺恐當時所職或有  近於冶者今不可知矣先觀吾趣者使學  其行歩也得之捷者言其速成也轡銜唇  吻在馬者也胸臆掌握在人者也履繩而  旋者其路雖如繩之小亦可以轉旋也曲  中者妙於中也氣力有餘御者不勞也猶  考工曰其衽不蔽之意也心閑身正者御  之從容也二十四蹄六馬之車也所投無  差馬行不亂也轍軌也車所行之道也車  外無餘轍也者車行不越乎轍之中也蹄  外無餘地者蹄不亂則其地不多也山谷  雖險原隰雖平我視之皆一同也履木而
Interpretation

This passage describes the charioteering art of Taidou, an ancient master of horsemanship. The core philosophy emphasizes that true mastery lies not in external control, but in achieving perfect unity between man and horse through mental attunement.

When instructing his disciple, Taidou stressed: "You learn quickly, but the essence of charioteering lies in spiritual communion. Just as your footsteps naturally follow your mind's intention when walking, so too must charioteering become an extension of your being." He taught the importance of harmonizing the reins (control ropes) and bit (metal mouthpiece), where subtle lip movements adjust speed while maintaining precise mental measurements and perfectly calibrated hand pressure. When the charioteer's mind merges with the horse's will, movement becomes effortless—advancing and retreating with natural grace, executing turns with perfect form, and traveling long distances without strain.

The true secret lies in: perceiving the horse's response through the bit, transmitting commands through the reins, sensing force through the palms, until all becomes one with the mind. At this level of mastery, one needs neither eyes to see nor whips to drive. With tranquil mind and upright posture, the six reins (for six-horse chariots) remain perfectly ordered, all twenty-four hooves (six horses) strike with precision, and every turn or maneuver flows in perfect rhythm. The chariot leaves no extraneous wheel marks beyond its path, the horses require no extra space beyond their hoofprints—whether traversing treacherous valleys or open plains, all terrain becomes equally manageable to the perfected charioteer.

The text later notes that "Taidou" was a legendary charioteer, while "Qiuji" possibly refers to ancient bamboo tools (used in bow-making or metallurgy), though its exact meaning remains obscure. The passage employs metaphors—comparing charioteering to learning basket-weaving before bow-making, or mastering metallurgical fundamentals—to illustrate how basic footwork forms the foundation. Particularly noteworthy details include: "twenty-four hooves" denoting six-horse teams, "spinning along rope-thin paths" describing nimble turns in narrow spaces, and "tranquil mind, upright posture" highlighting the charioteer's composed mentality. The ultimate achievement is described as leaving no traces beyond wheel tracks, needing no extra ground beyond hoofprints, and traversing all terrain—steep or level—with equal ease as walking flat land.

 行其說似迂觀今人縁竿履繩而躡屐者  則知世間自有此事列子言此不過以爲  人間之技且有此神妙況學道乎 魏黑卵以暱嫌殺丘邴章丘邴章之子來丹 謀報父之讎丹氣甚猛形甚露計粒而食順 風而趣雖怒不能稱丘以報之耻假力於人 誓手劍以屠黑卵黑卵悍志絶衆力抗百夫 筋骨皮肉非人類也延頸承刃披胸受矢鋩 鍔推屈而體無痕撻負其才力視來丹猶雛 鷇也來丹之友申他曰子怨黑卵至矣黑卵 之易子過矣將奚謀焉來丹垂涕曰願子爲 我謀申他曰吾聞衛孔周其祖得殷帝之寳 劍一童子服之却三軍之衆奚不請焉來丹 遂適衛見孔周執僕御之禮請先納妻子後 言所欲孔周曰吾有三劍唯子所擇皆不能 殺人且先言其狀一曰含光視之不可見運 之不知其有所觸也泯然無際經物而物不 覺二曰承影將旦昧爽之交旦夕昏明之際 北面而察之淡淡焉若有物存莫識其狀其 所觸也竊竊焉有聲經物而物不疾也三曰 宵練方晝則見影而不見光方夜見光而不 見形其觸物也𩦐然而過隨過隨合覺疾而 不血刃焉此三寳者傳之十三世矣而無施 於事匣而藏之未嘗啓封來丹曰雖然吾必 請其下者孔周乃歸其妻子與齋七目晏陰 之間跪而授其下劍來丹再拜受之以歸來
Interpretation

This passage recounts a parable about vengeance and divine swords. In the state of Wei lived a tyrant named Hei Luan who murdered Qiu Bingzhang due to personal enmity. Qiu's son Lai Dan vowed to avenge his father, but being physically frail—counting rice grains when eating and relying on wind currents when walking—he stood no chance against Hei Luan. The latter possessed Herculean strength and was impervious to weapons: blades bounced off his neck, arrows glanced off his chest, and he regarded Lai Dan as helpless as a newly hatched chick.

Lai Dan's friend Shen Ta heard that Kong Zhou of Wei possessed three divine swords handed down from Shang dynasty emperors: the first, "Light-Devouring Blade," was completely invisible and left no trace when slicing objects; the second, "Shadow-Bearing Blade," flickered at dawn and dusk with only faint sounds when cutting; the third, "Night-Tempered Blade," cast shadows without light by day and light without form by night, with wounds healing instantly. These swords had remained sheathed through thirteen generations.

Though Kong Zhou explained none could kill, Lai Dan insisted on borrowing the least of them—the "Night-Tempered Blade." After seven days of purification rituals, he received the sword kneeling at daybreak. The tale suspends here with profound implication: how might this seemingly harmless blade aid the weak against the strong? The allegory reveals how Daoist practitioners, though appearing fragile, can overcome worldly might by mastering the Dao's mysteries—much like tightrope walkers who defy common logic yet harmonize with celestial principles.

丹遂執劍從黑卵時黑卵之醉偃牖下自頸 至腰三斬之黑卵不覺來丹以黑卵之死趣 而退遇黑卵之子於門擊之三下如投虚黑 卵之子方笑曰汝何蚩而三招予來丹知劍 之不能殺人也歎而歸黑卵既醒怒其妻曰 醉而露我使我嗌疾而腰急其子曰疇昔來 丹之來遇我於門三招我亦使我體疾而支 彊彼其厭我哉  暱嫌私怨也氣甚猛威甚銳也形甚露骨  立也順風而趣其行弱也悍志絶衆其志  勇悍過人也痕撻痕跡也雛鷇初生之禽  也易子過矣甚輕汝也三劍之名方言厭  勝之術也泯然無際者泯没而不見邊際  也將旦昧爽之交日初出之時也旦夕昏  明之際日將入之時也旦夕猶言日暮也  昏明欲昏而欲明也晝則見影夜則見光  只有光影而無形也𩦐合作騞騞然微有  聲者請其下者求其第三劍也因其醉而  斬之疑其已死遂趨行而退回也擊之如  投虚劍已過如無物也蚩與癡同丹之三  擊彼以爲三招如兒戲也嗌疾喉急也支  彊肢體彊急而不柔和也蓋言厭勝之術  自有神異而況學道乎以此說而入其書  皆有意存焉非徒誇誕大言也 周穆王大征西戎西戎獻錕鋙之劍火浣之 布其劍長尺有咫練鋼赤刃用之切玉如切 泥焉火浣之布浣之必投於火布則火色垢 則布色出火而振之皓然疑乎雪皇子以爲
Interpretation

This passage recounts the strange tale of Lai Dan's quest for vengeance. Armed with a sword, Lai Dan sought revenge against his enemy Hei Luan, who lay drunk beneath a window. Lai Dan struck three blows from Hei Luan's neck to his waist, yet the man showed no reaction. Believing his foe dead, Lai Dan withdrew, only to encounter Hei Luan's son at the doorway. He thrust his sword three times at the youth, but the blade passed through as if through empty air. The son merely laughed and said, "Why do you foolishly wave at me three times?" Realizing the sword couldn't harm anyone, Lai Dan sighed and departed.

When Hei Luan sobered up, he scolded his wife: "You let me lie in the draft while drunk—now my throat aches and my back is sore." His son added, "Earlier at the door, Lai Dan waved at me three times, leaving me feeling unwell with stiff limbs. Were they cursing us?"

Several key points are explained here: The "art of ritual domination" (yansheng zhi shu) refers to ancient shamanistic practices of subduing others through curses or magic. The text mentions three swords by name, all associated with local domination rituals. These spells work best during liminal hours—either at dawn ("the transition between night and dawn") or dusk ("the boundary between light and dark"). When the sword strikes, it "passes through void," leaving only light and shadow without physical effect.

The passage further supplements with an anecdote about King Mu of Zhou: When campaigning against the Western Rong tribes, they presented him with the legendary "Kunwu" sword and "fire-washed cloth." The sword could slice through iron like mud and cleave jade effortlessly. The cloth required cleansing by fire—turning crimson in the flames while stains reverted to the fabric's color; shaken out, it emerged white as snow. These accounts demonstrate that marvelous objects truly exist, implying Lai Dan's experience wasn't fabricated and that Daoist practitioners might indeed wield extraordinary arts. The entire narrative illustrates how seemingly absurd stories contain profound meanings—they aren't merely exaggerations.

無此物傳之者妄蕭叔曰皇子果於自信果 於誣理哉  練鋼鍊熟之鋼金也赤刃金精其色赤也  如切泥言柔軟也切玉之劍今雖未見火  浣之布今人嘗見之世間自有此事果於  自信者言皇子但信其耳目所及而不知  天下有此神異之事遂以傳者爲妄是誣  理也從前鋪說至此方結以兩句蓋謂人  各以其淺近之見而疑此廣大之言非知  理者也 沖虚至
Interpretation

This passage discusses the limitations of human cognition. Master Xiao remarks: The royal disciple (likely referring to a certain practitioner) excessively trusts his own judgment, thereby contradicting the truth.

Two examples are given to illustrate this point: First, the forging of refined steel (referring to high-quality metal repeatedly tempered) – crimson blades (sharp red weapons) are crafted from the purest metal. Second, while no one today has seen a sword capable of cutting jade, people have witnessed fire-washed fabric (likely referring to specially treated cloth). These marvelous things truly exist in the world, yet the royal disciple, trusting only what he has personally seen, arbitrarily dismisses all legendary marvels as falsehoods, thus distorting the truth.

The author concludes: People often use their limited knowledge to challenge greater truths – such individuals do not truly comprehend the Dao (the Way). Through concrete examples, the entire passage critiques the cognitive attitude of stubbornly clinging to narrow experience while denying the unknown.

徳眞經鬳齋口義卷之五

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0120); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 4 Vol. 6 →