中文 · EN

《沖虛至德真經解》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 3 / 8 15,520 characters

About this page. The original text of 《沖虛至德真經解》 Vol. 3 (Dongshen 洞神部, 8 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 34 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《沖虛至德真經解》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

舜亦謂其與桀跖同腐蓋自道觀之則黃帝之治初不離 道由 帝王之功以觀則大道之體已隱矣其功名之跡幾何而不與 時俱運而同歸於盡耶其稱楊朱之 言豈非去黃帝之功名而 存其大道歟     穆王 上 周穆王時西極之國有化人來入水火貫金石反山川 移城邑 乘虛不墜觸實不硋千變萬化不可窮極旣已 變物之形又且 易人之慮穆王敬之若神事之若君推 路寢以居之引三牲以 進之選女樂以娛之化人以爲 王之宮室卑陋而不可處王之 厨饌腥螻而不可饗王 之嬪御膻惡而不可親穆王乃爲之改 築土木之功赭 堊之色無遺巧焉五府爲虛而臺始成其高千 仭臨終 南之上號曰中天之臺簡鄭衞之處子娥媌靡曼者施 芳澤正娥眉設笄珥衣阿錫曳齊䊵粉白黛黑佩玉環 雜芷若 以滿之奏承雲六瑩九韶晨露以樂之月月獻 玉衣旦旦薦玉 食化人猶不舍然不得已而臨之居亡 幾何謁王同遊王執化 人之祛騰而上者中天迺止曁 及化人之宮化人之宮構以金 銀絡以珠玉出雲雨之 上而不知下之所據望之若雲屯焉耳 目所觀聽鼻口 所納嘗皆非人間之有王實以爲淸都紫微鈞 天廣樂 帝之所居王俯而視之其宮榭若累塊積蘇焉王自以 居數十年不思其國也
Interpretation

The text recounts two parables. The first concerns Emperor Shun’s evaluation of the Yellow Emperor’s achievements, while the second describes King Mu of Zhou’s mystical encounter with a "transformation master" (化人, huaren).

From the perspective of the Dao (道), Shun observed that the Yellow Emperor’s accomplishments were fundamentally no different from those of tyrants like Jie or the bandit Zhi. Though the Yellow Emperor ushered in an era of peace, his pursuit of fame and merit inherently deviated from the Great Way. The text references Yang Zhu (杨朱), a Warring States philosopher who advocated renouncing worldly honors and wealth—perhaps as a return to the original essence of the Dao that the Yellow Emperor had once followed.

During King Mu of Zhou’s reign, a "transformation master" from the west arrived, possessing extraordinary divine powers. This master could traverse fire and water, penetrate metal and stone, reshape mountains and cities at will, and even influence human thought. The king revered him as a deity, constructing lavish palaces and selecting beautiful women and musicians to entertain him. Yet the master found all mortal luxuries crude and unrefined. In response, King Mu exhausted his treasury to build the "Mid-Heaven Tower" (中天之台), soaring thousands of ren high.

After reluctantly ascending the tower, the master took King Mu on a celestial journey to his own palace—a structure of gold, silver, and jewels floating above clouds and rain, where the food and music surpassed anything in the human realm. The king believed this to be the "Pristine Capital and Purple Palace" (清都紫微), the abode of the Celestial Emperor. Yet to the master, even this splendor resembled mere clods of earth and piles of straw. King Mu lingered there, nearly forgetting his kingdom.

This parable contrasts the earthly and celestial realms, illustrating Daoist transcendence over worldly glory. The transformation master embodies the perspective of one who has attained the Dao: to him, even humanity’s grandest luxuries remain vulgar. The juxtaposition implies that cultivators must rise above material indulgence to pursue higher spiritual realms.

 解曰方外之與方內其不相及亦遠矣穆王方之內者也化  人方之外者也西方主金金爲從革故化人之來 必自西極  也物本非有身原太虛化人造物之主也六合所不能拘五  行所不能役故可以撮乾坤于黍 米之中促刧運于須臾之  內綽綽然猶有餘地至於入水火貫金石反山川移城邑變  物之形易人之慮 皆平常閑事爾穆王在耄荒之中見物皆  有知身不虛故驚天駭地而敬之若神事之若君推路寢引  三 牲選女樂庶幾其歡心焉而不知化人之所樂者眞樂無  樂爾及以爲卑陋腥膻困𢣌中顙而不肯一顧 焉王又改築  中天之臺於終南之上其高千仭選鄭衞之處子以滿之奏  承雲六瑩九韶晨露以樂之獻 玉衣進玉食而不知化人者  居無居味無味色無色聲無聲又豈悅夫人間之所悅者乎  化人見王有慇 懃恭敬之心似可教者然未可頓超最上乘  道試漸引之入於下乘之道使攬其祛而同遊上中天之半  及化人之宮搆以金銀絡以珠玉出雲霄之外上無所攀下  無所據若雲屯於碧霄而不墜焉耳目之所 觀聽鼻口之所  納嘗皆非世間之所有自以爲淸都紫微鈞天廣樂上帝之  宮闕乃復從上俯而視之卻 見人間昔日舊宮但累土積薪  爾與蜂房蟻穴何以異哉乃捨卑穢趨高潔不願復還於故  都髣髴數十
Interpretation

This scripture recounts the encounter between King Mu of Zhou (the fifth ruler of the Western Zhou Dynasty) and a "transformation being" (huaren)—an immortal with miraculous powers—from the Western Paradise. Through stark contrasts, it reveals the fundamental differences between worldly existence and transcendent states.

The transformation being hailed from the Western Paradise, where the West corresponds to the Metal phase in the Five Phases (Wuxing), symbolizing radical transformation. This immortal was essentially the creator of all things, unbound by heaven and earth, capable of altering material forms at will. He could compress the entire cosmos into a single millet grain, condense vast cosmic cycles into fleeting moments, and traverse fire, water, metal, and stone as effortlessly as moving mountains or overturning seas—all mere child's play to him.

King Mu, as a worldly ruler, marveled at these supernatural powers and hosted the immortal with the highest honors: constructing lavish palaces, offering sacrificial animals, and selecting beautiful courtesans to perform ancient musical pieces like "Bearing Clouds" (Chengyun) and "Sixfold Radiance" (Liuying). Yet the transformation being had long transcended sensory pleasures—he dwelled without attachment to abodes, savored without clinging to flavors, and remained utterly indifferent to worldly delights.

Recognizing the king's sincerity, the immortal guided him to visit a celestial palace suspended midair. Built with gold, silver, pearls, and jade, this palace floated among clouds, filled with sights and sounds beyond mortal experience. King Mu initially believed he had reached the Purple Tenuity Palace where the Celestial Emperor resided. But when he gazed down at the human realm, he realized his former palaces were as crude as beehives or anthills. From then on, the king's heart yearned for this higher state, and for dozens of days he refused to return to the mundane world.

Through these striking contrasts, the passage illustrates how realized beings transcend material constraints, while worldly splendor appears to immortals as mere accumulations of dust. The transformation being displayed his powers not for ostentation, but to gradually guide the earthly ruler toward comprehending higher truths.

年矣嗚呼穆王亦丹臺之舊侶也謫降人間塵  俗之氣尙未深染故能安棲聖境此雖下乘之所居豈胎 生  肉人所能到哉縱使能到亦魂驚魄喪而必求反歸也 化人復謁王同遊所及之處仰不見日月俯不見河海 光影所 照王目眩不能得視音響所來王耳亂不能得 聽百骸六臟悸 而不凝意迷精喪請化人求還化人移 之王若殞虛焉旣寤所 坐猶嚮者之處侍御猶嚮者之 人視其前則酒未淸肴未昲王 問所從來左右曰王默 存耳由此穆王自失者三月而復更問 化人化人曰吾 與王神遊也形奚動哉且曩之所居奚異王之 宮曩之 所遊奚異王之圃王閒常疑蹔亡變化之極徐疾之閒 可盡模哉王大悅不恤國事不樂臣妾肆意遠遊命駕 八駿之 乘右服𦽊騮而左綠耳右驂赤驥而左白滅主 車則造父爲御 商角爲右次車之乘右服渠黃而左踰 輪左驂盗驪而右山子 栢夭主車參百爲御奔戎爲右 馳驅千里至於巨蒐氏之國巨 蒐氏乃獻白鵠之血以 飮王具牛馬之湩以洗王之足及二乘 之人已飮而行 遂宿於崑崙之阿赤水之陽别日升于崑崙之 邱以觀 黃帝之宮而封之以詒後世遂賓於西王母觴於瑤池
Interpretation

King Mu of Zhou (the fifth ruler of the Zhou dynasty) was originally an immortal companion from the Celestial Dan Terrace (a Daoist abode of deities), who descended to the mortal realm as an exile. Because he had not yet been deeply tainted by worldly influences, he could still dwell in this sacred place. Though this was considered a lower-tier celestial residence, it remained inaccessible to ordinary mortals—even if one managed to reach it, they would be terrified out of their wits and desperate to flee.

The shape-shifting immortal (the "Transforming Man") visited King Mu again and took him on a journey through the celestial realms. There, looking up, he saw neither sun, moon, nor stars; looking down, he beheld no rivers, lakes, or seas. The dazzling light overwhelmed his vision, and the divine music deafened his ears. Trembling uncontrollably, his organs churning, his spirit in disarray, he begged the immortal to return him. With a gentle push, the immortal sent him reeling as if falling from a great height—only for him to awaken back in his original seat, his attendants still in place, the wine and dishes before him not yet cooled. When he asked his attendants what had just happened, they replied, "Your Majesty merely closed your eyes to rest for a moment." The experience left King Mu in a daze for three months.

Later, when he questioned the immortal about the mystery of it all, the immortal explained, "I only took your spirit (Shen) on the journey—your body never moved. Besides, what difference is there between that celestial realm and your own palace gardens?" Only then did King Mu realize that what seemed like vanishing transformations were merely illusions caused by differences in speed. From then on, he became obsessed with the Daoist path, neglecting court affairs, distancing himself from concubines and ministers, and devoting himself solely to distant travels in search of immortality.

He rode in a chariot drawn by eight divine steeds: in the center were Hualiu and Lü’er, flanked by Chiji and Baiyi, with Zaofu as the charioteer and Shangjue as his companion. The secondary chariot was pulled by Quhuang and Yulun, with Daoli and Shanzi on either side, driven by Baiyao and accompanied by Benrong. They raced a thousand miles to the lands of the Jusou tribe (a western nomadic people), where the locals offered swan’s blood for the king to drink and washed his feet with the milk of cows and horses. After resting, they pressed onward, camping overnight at the southern bank of the Red River, north of Mount Kunlun.

The next day, they ascended to Kunlun’s summit to visit the palace left behind by the Yellow Emperor (the legendary ruler who achieved immortality through Daoist cultivation) and erected a stele in commemoration. Then they paid respects to the Queen Mother of the West (the supreme goddess of Kunlun), feasting and drinking by the shores of the Jade Pond.

之上西王母爲王謠王和之其辭哀焉迺觀日之所入 一日行 萬里王乃歎曰於乎予一人不盈於德而諧於 樂後世其追數 吾過乎穆王幾神人哉能窮當身之樂 猶百年乃徂世以爲登 假焉  解曰化人之道千變萬化不出於一唯其至一是以眞能證  其道者一超而入無有漸次以夫學者其才未可 告以聖人  之至道也故假示中天之化使之覩人間之無有審世累之  可厭而不思其國矣乃始示以至 道之眞境也仰不見日月  則高不足以擬之俯不見河海則深不足以命之光影所照  目亂而不能得視 則天光內發可視以神而不可視以目音  響所來耳亂而不能得聽則天籟自鳴可聽以氣而不可聽   以耳由此而視化人之宮亦猶中天之視其國矣穆王不足  以進此故解心釋神意迷精喪請化人求還也 夫化人復謁  王同遊所及之處則初不離於中天而見聞之異迺至此者  蓋妙道所在不離當處頓超羣 有非特不異於化人之宮爾  其所居其所遊初不異於王之宮王之圃也由是知狂聖之  所以異域者名 轉而實不轉人迷而道不迷亦若神游而形  不動也嘗謂化人之來於西極也豈徒顯奇出異務駭於俗
Interpretation

This passage recounts the miraculous encounter between King Mu of Zhou and the Queen Mother of the West (a revered Daoist deity), revealing profound truths about spiritual cultivation.

When King Mu sought teachings from the Queen Mother, she responded by singing him a mournful ballad. Though the king traveled ten thousand miles daily, he sighed at sunset: "With insufficient Virtue (De) yet indulging in pleasures, future generations will surely condemn my faults!" While yearning for immortal realms, he could only pursue fleeting worldly joys—yet people mistook him for an attained immortal.

The states of Dao practitioners vary infinitely, but all hinge on "guarding the One" (focusing on original mind). True adepts transcend worldly dust instantly, without gradual progression. For ordinary cultivators, however, celestial visions must first be shown to reveal earthly illusions and worldly burdens, dissolving attachment before ultimate truth can dawn.

In this supreme state: Gazing upward, neither sun nor moon appears, for celestial heights defy description; looking downward, no rivers or seas are seen, as earthly depths elude measurement. Blazing light dazzles eyes—one must observe through "spirit vision" (Shen sight) rather than physical eyes; chaotic noises deafen ears—listening requires "Qi perception" (inner awareness) beyond ordinary hearing. When King Mu beheld immortal palaces, his awe mirrored mortals viewing heavens—yet his immature practice left him mentally overwhelmed, begging to return.

In truth, the immortals never took King Mu beyond the Central Heaven (celestial core)—the shifting visions reflected his fluctuating mind. The wondrous Dao realm exists here and now; sudden awakening transcends mundanity. Divine abodes seem miraculous yet differ little from royal gardens—demonstrating how sagehood and mundanity share one essence beneath different names, like spirit journeys while the body stays. These western immortals aren't novelties startling the world, but natural manifestations of the Dao's flow.

 哉蓋將俾斯民同之乎妙道而後已如穆王能先覺其道則  黃帝華胥之治可幾矣奚止一身之娛哉 方穆王虛五府以  爲化人之奉化人猶不舍然化人豈眞有心於聲色臭味之  樂哉蓋欲其卽此而悟世 味之無樂也此而不悟於是化人  與之爲神游顯示幻化欲其覩化工之隨起隨滅而悟神理  之自然也 彼方假示變化穆王乃實以爲淸都紫微鈞天廣  樂而樂之抑又非矣至於化人復謁王同游則示以道 之眞  境也穆王至此非特不能進請於化人而求還矣何則妙道  之行超於形體豈未得於道未證其理 者所能居其域哉化  人知其終不悟矣故於其求還也亦不制止之焉雖然化人  移之王若隕虛是亦所 以覺之也而穆王終以不悟故及其  旣寤則自失者三月也然而由此而復更問化人化人語以  神遊之 理乃始悟變化之理而大悅也於是不恤國事而遺  物不樂臣妾而離人肆意而不守其心遠遊而不局 於近命  駕八駿之乘馳驅無所不至矣夫造父三百之倫不世出八  駿之乘非常有一日而行萬里則其 超虛送日之步風雲不  足以擬其駃矣馳驅千里至於巨蒐氏之國者蒐擇也方且  馳驅而擇所徂向也
Interpretation

This passage recounts the story of King Mu of Zhou (the fifth ruler of the Western Zhou Dynasty) encountering a Transformation Master (a Daoist immortal capable of shape-shifting). The immortal sought to guide King Mu toward comprehending the true essence of the Dao through extraordinary experiences.

Initially, the Transformation Master displayed sensual pleasures, intending for the king to see through the illusory nature of worldly enjoyments. When King Mu became immersed in these delights, the immortal then took him on a celestial journey through the void, revealing miraculous transformations to demonstrate how all phenomena arise and perish as natural occurrences. Yet the king mistook these visions for reality, believing he had reached the Pure Capital and Purple Tenuity (the Daoist celestial realm) where immortals dwelled, hearing the Heavenly Music of the Broad Plain (celestial melodies).

Later, the Transformation Master took King Mu on another journey, this time revealing the true realm of the Dao. However, the king not only failed to comprehend it but begged to return. This is because the profound Dao transcends physical perception—those who have not attained the Way cannot abide in it permanently. Realizing King Mu would never attain enlightenment, the immortal sent him back to the mortal world. Upon awakening, the king remained despondent for three months. Only after consulting the Transformation Master again did he grasp the principle of celestial travel, finally understanding the Dao of transformation.

From then on, King Mu ceased concerning himself with state affairs, casting off worldly attachments to indulge his spirit in distant wanderings. Riding his eight divine steeds (legendary horses of King Mu), he could travel ten thousand miles in a single day, outpacing even the wind and clouds. Roaming aimlessly, he eventually arrived at the land of the Jusou people (a mythical distant kingdom). The character "sou" (蒐) means "to choose," symbolizing his newfound freedom to follow his heart's desires wherever they led.

白鵠潔白高飛之物牛馬任重致遠之  畜獻白鵠之血以飲王將易其慮而使之趨高也具牛馬之  湩以 洗王之足則滌其形而使之致遠也崑崙西極之山也  謂之崑崙則擬夫道之高明渾淪也赤水之陽水 之北也陰  而含陽元妙之象也其始也至於巨蒐氏之國則過之而不  守宿於崑崙之阿赤水之陽則猶 託宿而不久處也别日升  於崑崙之邱則進於道矣莊子以支離叔觀於冥伯之邱崑  崙之墟爲黃帝之 所休謂黃帝由崑崙之邱南望還歸而遺  其玄珠則崑崙之象道可知矣夫穆王能升於崑崙之邱則   其肆意所遊亦遠矣然其行不能無假於輿馬非若化人之  神游也故雖一日行萬里猶可期以數雖入於 西極終亦不  過乎崑崙不遊乎太虛而不能至化人所從來之國也黃帝  至聖之人也雖封於其宮而不 見其人西王母仙聖之種也  雖不容於不主而賓之亦與之觴於瑤池之上而徒歌以倡  之宜能心醉其 道而得其樂矣而穆王之和其辭哀焉是止  能窮當身之人樂而不得夫天樂者也迺觀日之所入者日  道喻也莊子以十日並出萬物皆照爲德之盛則日之入於  西極其聖人歛道而歸於大本大宗之象歟 觀日之所入則  觀之而已不能造其道也故終則嘆不盈于德而諧於樂
Interpretation

This passage employs symbolic imagery to describe stages of Daoist cultivation. The white crane symbolizes purity and transcendence, while oxen and horses represent worldly burdens. Offering crane's blood for the ruler to drink signifies elevating his spiritual awareness; washing feet with livestock milk represents grounding in practical reality. Mount Kunlun (sacred Daoist mountain) embodies the supreme Dao, while the northern bank of the Red River signifies the mysterious state of Yin-Yang harmony.

The cultivator first passes through the land of the Jusou people (symbolizing mundane society) without attachment, and even dwelling at Kunlun's foothills remains temporary. Only upon reaching the mountain's summit does one truly attain the Dao. The Yellow Emperor (venerated Daoist sage-king) once rested at Kunlun yet lost his Mystic Pearl (symbolizing Dao's essence) there, demonstrating how the mountain itself manifests the Dao.

King Mu of Zhou (Zhou dynasty ruler) could ascend Kunlun, but relied on chariots rather than the transcendent roaming of immortals in the cosmic void (Taixu). At best he reached the western extremities, never achieving the celestial wandering of perfected beings. Sages like the Yellow Emperor built palaces leaving no traces; the Queen Mother of the West (supreme female immortal) never actively reveals herself yet hosts feasts at the Jade Pool (celestial realm). Though King Mu could accompany celestial music, he only experienced mundane pleasures, never comprehending the harmonies of heavenly Dao.

Observing sunset (symbolizing Dao's return to origin) resembles witnessing sages withdrawing the Dao to its source. Zhuangzi uses ten suns illuminating all things to represent perfect Virtue (De), while sunset in the west signifies the sage's return to Dao's root. Yet merely watching sunset cannot truly grasp the Dao—thus one ultimately laments insufficient Virtue to reach supreme joy.

 也周書稱其百年耄荒者是所 謂後世追數其過也然而能  窮當身之樂而得壽之大齋是乃世俗之所謂登假於道者  故考以竹書蠧 簡求諸石室不絕金繩山經爾雅及乎大傳  等書咸紀其說焉嘗謂黃帝之夢神行也穆王之化亦神遊  也夢 化均矣而異其治効者黃帝之夢本於齋心服形穆王  之化殆變易於化人爾又黃帝之寤得之自然穆 王乃不得  已謂於化人而求還爾此黃帝所以旣寤則怡然自得而致  華胥之治而穆王旣寤則自失者 三月止於窮當身之樂而  已 老成子學幻於尹文先生三年不吿老成子請其過而 求退尹 文先生揖而進之於室屏左右而與之言  解曰欲學幻者是欲以幻還學於幻也三年之久其幻化之  極可盡模哉三年不吿其術是以不告吿之也老 成子莫能  洞視不說之理方且請過而求退故尹文先生不得已而與  之言揖而進之於室其道奥也屛 左右而與之言則眾不見  獨非所與知也所謂老成子則晚聞大道而能有成者也故  其學幻於尹文先 生則始也請其過而求退終能傳其術也  所謂尹文先生則內得於道示斯文以尹眾者也故老成子  學 其術焉 曰昔老𥅆之徂西也顧而吿予曰有生之氣有形之狀 盡幻也
Interpretation

The Book of Zhou records that the Yellow Emperor (Huangdi) lived to a hundred years but became senile in his later years—this represents later generations recounting his shortcomings. Yet the fact that he enjoyed worldly pleasures during his lifetime while also attaining longevity aligns with what common people call "attaining the Dao and ascending as an immortal."

Examining bamboo slips, stone chamber archives (ancient repositories of texts), as well as classics like the Classic of Mountains and Seas (Shanhai Jing) and Erya, all contain similar accounts. The Yellow Emperor's dreams were journeys of his spirit (Shen), while King Mu of Zhou's transformations also involved distant travels of the spirit—the forms are similar, but the effects differ. The Yellow Emperor's dreams arose from purification rituals (Zhaijiao), calming the mind, and regulating the body (cultivation practices), whereas King Mu's transformations came from the guidance of an extraordinary being. Upon waking, the Yellow Emperor attained spontaneous realization, while King Mu had to seek help from the extraordinary being to return. Thus, after awakening, the Yellow Emperor remained serene and went on to establish the prosperous era of Huaxu, whereas King Mu awoke with lingering regret and spent three months indulging in worldly pleasures.

Lao Chengzi studied the art of illusion with Master Yinwen for three years without receiving transmission, so he requested to leave. Master Yinwen then led him into an inner chamber, dismissed the attendants, and instructed him privately. This illustrates that the very desire to learn illusion is itself an illusion—how could three years exhaust the Dao of transformation? The lack of transmission was precisely because it cannot be conveyed through words. Initially, Lao Chengzi did not understand this principle and sought to depart, yet ultimately he received the secret teachings—"Lao Cheng" (Old Accomplished) signifies one who attains the Dao in later years, while "Yinwen" (Governor of Texts) represents using the Dao to master language and teach the world.

Master Yinwen recounted Lao Dan's (Laozi) words when traveling westward: "The breath (Qi) of all living things, the forms of all existence—in essence, they are all illusory." This statement reveals the profound truth that all phenomena are illusory.

造化之所始陰陽之所變者謂之生謂之死窮 數達變因形移 者謂之化謂之幻造物者其巧妙其功 深固難窮難終因形者 其巧顯其功淺故隨起隨滅知 幻化之不異生死也始可與學 幻矣吾與汝亦幻也奚 須學哉  解曰死生幻化槩而論之如形之影如水之漚如薤之露如  電之光皆幻而已極其巧妙功深而難窮難終者 謂之生死  卽其巧顯功淺而隨起隨滅者謂之幻化謂之者因其用而  彊名之也故徼妙雖殊其巧均也 淺深雖異其功等也則幻  化奚異於生死哉唯知幻化之不異生死則死生不足以爲  大幻化不可以言 淺死生不能變幻化自我出矣故學幻者  必本於知幻也雖然知不離覺說有覺者不離幻境說無覺   者亦不離幻是故由知學幻以幻幻物雖能幻物我猶在幻  旣有學幻之知斯墮爲幻之境矣唯眞能以性 覺者諸幻盡  滅初無有心奚須學哉然則尹文先生之不告老成子是眞  能幻者矣 老成子歸用尹文先生之言深思三月遂能存亡自在 憣校四 時冬起雷夏造冰飛者走走者飛終身不著其 術固世莫傳焉  解曰麗於形體無動非幻造化雖妙亦不離幻造化幻物常  因人爲人之爲幻亦依天理造化之幻不離陰陽 人之幻化  不離數變制於陰陽則雖眞亦幻窮其數變則卽幻而覺覺  在於我幻豈屬彼苟得此道矣不
Interpretation

All things in heaven and earth come into being and transform through the interaction of yin and yang Qi. This process of transformation we call "birth" and "death." Those who can perceive the patterns of development in things and adapt according to form are said to understand "transformation" and "illusion." The workings of the Creator (referring to natural laws) are exquisitely subtle, their effects profound and inexhaustible; while illusory transformations dependent on form may appear clever on the surface, their effects are shallow, and thus they arise and perish in the same moment.

Only those who understand that "illusion" and "birth-death" share the same essence are qualified to study the arts of transformation. In truth, both you and I are illusory existences—why then should we deliberately seek to learn such arts?

Fundamentally, birth-death and transformation are like shadows clinging to forms, bubbles floating on water, dew clinging to chives, or the flash of lightning—all are illusory. Those phenomena that are subtle, profound, and inexhaustible we call "birth-death"; those that are obvious on the surface and fleeting in effect we call "transformation." These names are merely forced distinctions made to categorize different manifestations.

Whether subtle or obvious, the ingenuity of their essence remains the same; whether profound or shallow, their fundamental function is equal. So what difference is there between transformation and birth-death? Only by understanding this principle can one transcend the limitations of birth-death and freely master the arts of transformation. Those who wish to learn transformation must first comprehend the fundamental truth that "all is illusory."

Yet we must note that cognition cannot be separated from perception. Those who speak of perception cannot escape the realm of illusion, and those who speak of non-perception are likewise bound by illusion. Thus, to study transformation through cognition and use illusory arts to alter external things—though one may change external objects—one remains trapped in illusion. Only those who truly awaken to their innate nature can dissolve all illusions, with no need to deliberately study such arts. Master Yin Wen did not directly instruct Lao Chengzi precisely because he had truly grasped the essence of transformation.

After returning home, Lao Chengzi contemplated Master Yin Wen's teachings deeply for three months, until he could freely manipulate existence and dissolution, birth and transformation. He could invert the four seasons—making thunder roll in winter and ice form in summer—and interchange the natures of flying birds and running beasts. Yet throughout his life, he never displayed these arts, and thus they could not be transmitted to the world.

All movements dependent on form are illusory; even the exquisite transformations of nature cannot escape illusion. Nature often creates things through human agency, while human transformations must follow natural laws. Nature's transformations cannot be separated from the interplay of yin and yang, and human transformations cannot be separated from numerical principles. Bound by the laws of yin and yang, even reality appears illusory; by exhausting the permutations of numerical principles, one awakens within illusion. Awakening lies within oneself—how can illusion bind you? Those who truly understand this principle need not cling to the arts of transformation.

特能幻物而不幻於物爾  遂能憣校四時更造雷冰變易飛走奪造化之幻矣且所謂  幻者果何自而然 哉要其所本依於妙心是生其體猶如空  華從空而有幻體雖顯幻理則妙顯斯有幻妙故能幻唯顯  故 可得而言唯妙故必深思三月而後得其道爾且古之學  幻者非曰幻可以駭俗也故學之蓋將卽幻而 覺其道爾故  語其能幻則飛走可易雷冰可造及旣得其道則終身不著  其術固世莫傳焉噫幻化之妙 若此故尹文先生亦不自任  其道姑道老君徂西而告之之言爾 子列子曰善爲化者其道密庸其功同人五帝之德三 王之功 未必盡智勇之力或由化而成孰測之哉  解曰天地之所以爲天地者幻化萬物也聖人之所以爲聖  人者覺幻化之道也天地之幻物陰陽迭運寒暑 審度使萬  物莫不由其道而得其宜不以憣校四時爲功也如天地亦  以冬起雷夏造冰爲幻則物無遺 類矣則善爲化者亦奚以  顯奇出異務駭人之觀聽爲哉是以聖人之化雖曰密庸不  可俄而測其功則 亦同於人而已此老成子之能幻所以終  身不著也孔子能之而不爲亦此道也五帝三王皆古聖人   也或遜或爭因時適變雖示智勇之功而默運不言之妙人  能覩其功而莫測其化之之由未足以語帝王 之治也
Interpretation

This passage explores the profound principles of "illusory transformation" (huanhua), the Daoist concept of supernatural abilities to transform all things. Those who truly master this art can alter the four seasons, summon thunder and lightning, create ice and snow, and change the forms of birds and beasts—capabilities that verge on altering the very laws of nature.

Yet the crucial point is that this miraculous power of transformation originates from the "wondrous mind" (miaoxin), the mysterious original heart. Like flowers appearing in the void, though the illusions are visible, the profound truth they embody is the fundamental essence. The surface phenomena can be explained, but the deeper mysteries require prolonged silent contemplation to grasp.

In ancient times, those who studied the art of illusion did not do so to frighten ordinary people, but rather to awaken to the Dao through these transformations. Take Master Yinwen, a Daoist figure—though highly skilled in this art, he never boasted, only saying it was transmitted to him when Laozi journeyed westward.

Liezi, another great Daoist figure, said: "Those truly adept at transformation conceal their methods in plain sight, yet their efficacy is no different from ordinary people." The virtues and achievements of the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors may not have relied solely on wisdom and courage, but also on this transformative power of nurturing.

The greatness of Heaven and Earth lies in their ability to transform all things; the transcendence of sages lies in their understanding of the principles of transformation. Heaven and Earth nurture the myriad beings through the interplay of Yin and Yang and the alternation of cold and heat, yet they never deliberately flaunt unseasonal thunder or snow to show off. Similarly, true masters do not use bizarre illusions to dazzle the crowd.

Thus, the teachings of sages may seem ordinary, yet their efficacy matches that of ordinary people. Lao Chengzi, though skilled in the art of transformation, never revealed it in his lifetime; Confucius, though capable, never flaunted his abilities—both embody this principle. The ancient sages, from the Three Sovereigns to the Five Emperors, were sometimes humble, sometimes bold, all adapting to the changes of their time. Outwardly, they appeared to rely on wisdom and courage, but in truth, they aligned with the ineffable subtlety of the Dao. Ordinary people see only their achievements, failing to grasp the profound mysteries of transformation within—which is why they remain unqualified to discuss the true art of governance.

覺有八徵夢有六候奚謂八徵一曰故二曰爲三曰得 四曰喪 五曰哀六曰樂七曰生八曰死此八徵者形所 接也奚謂六候 一曰正夢二曰蘁夢三曰思夢四曰寤 夢五曰喜夢六曰懼夢 此六者神所交也  解曰覺之證夢之候雖神形所遇不一其理要其所本唯其  心之自造爾 不識感變之所起者事至則惑其所由然識感變之所 起者事 至則知其所由然知其所由然則無所怛  解曰感變之所起不出於覺之證夢之候理之當耳識其所  由然且能無所怛而况於知道乎知道者雖生死曾 無變乎  已其視夢覺亦末矣 一體之盈虛消息皆通於天地應於物類故陰氣壯則 夢涉大 水而恐懼陽氣壯則夢涉大火而燔焫陰陽俱 壯則夢生殺甚 飽則夢與甚飢則夢取是以以浮虛爲 疾者則夢揚以沉實爲 疾者則夢溺藉帶而寢則夢蛇 飛鳥衘髮則夢飛將陰夢火將 疾夢食飲酒者憂歌舞 者哭  解曰夢者神之所遇也至神之道陰陽莫測莫之能測則莫  之能制矣人之爲神因精而集寓於形體因於陰 陽因於彼  則必役於彼矣此一體之盈虛消息神遇爲夢所以通於天  地應於物類而無所逃也故夢涉 大水夢涉大火氣實制之
Interpretation

In the waking state, humans experience eight types of perceptions, while in dreams they encounter six distinct categories. The eight waking perceptions are: 1) recalling past events; 2) taking deliberate action; 3) achieving success; 4) suffering loss; 5) experiencing sorrow; 6) feeling joy; 7) encountering new beginnings; 8) facing endings and death. These all arise from the interaction between the physical body and the external world.

The six dream categories include: 1) ordinary dreams (zhengmeng); 2) nightmares (emeng); 3) wish-fulfillment dreams (simeng); 4) hypnagogic dreams between sleep and wakefulness (wumeng); 5) joyful dreams (ximeng); and 6) fearful dreams (jumeng). These all stem from the activities of the Shen (spirit).

Though human waking perceptions and dream phenomena manifest differently, their root cause lies in mental activity. Those who don't understand the origin of these perceptual changes become confused when events occur, while those who comprehend their underlying principles can discern their causes. Understanding these causes eliminates fear.

Dreaming reflects the workings of the Shen. The supreme Dao of spirit transcends even the transformations of Yin-Yang. Human Shen depends on physical form and is influenced by the dual Qi of Yin and Yang. When this balance is disrupted: excessive Yin Qi causes dreams of crossing great waters with terror; excessive Yang Qi brings dreams of traversing fire and being burned; when both are excessive, one dreams of life-and-death struggles. Overeating leads to dreams of giving, while hunger produces dreams of taking. Those with light bodies dream of flying, while those with heavy bodies dream of drowning. Sleeping on belts brings snake dreams, and hair caught by birds induces dreams of flight. When Yin Qi is about to peak, one dreams of fire; impending illness brings dreams of eating. Drunkards have anxious dreams, while celebrants dream of weeping.

These dream phenomena demonstrate how human spiritual activity resonates with all things between heaven and earth, with internal Yin-Yang transformations manifesting through dreams. Those who truly comprehend the great Dao regard even life and death with equanimity—how much more so the distinction between dreams and waking?

 也飽而夢與飢而夢取欲則使之也或夢揚或夢溺則疾癘  得以蠧吾之神也 或夢蛇或夢飛則物類得以感吾之神也  將陰夢火將疾夢食則夢想之顚倒有如此者飲酒者憂歌  舞 者哭則憂喜之更生有如此者夫以一身之微百年之生  晝夜居半一不能守其純氣則與時盈虛陰陽 萬物晝夜爲  吾之寇形勞而不休神耗而不已終身役役與物俱化矣可  不悟哉嘗究夢覺之理夜旦之 常爾夢之所見雖曰神遇實  爲形役形之役我非形能役我則自役由我役形形反役我  我受其役反不 能制方其爲夢不知是夢因覺知夢俄而復  夢猶以爲覺夜旦遷流而不停終身夢覺而不悟雖水火取  與等相初無有實而憂懼喜樂之態眞有於心然而覺能知  夢夢不知覺則覺固眞於夢覺之所爲止存 於思慮之中夢  之先知乃見於思慮之外則夢實靈於覺旦旦之覺其云爲  常有倫昔昔之夢其聞見常 不續夢覺須臾之說爾其差殊  之變乃至於此又况生死爲去來之大變苟非其人欲無輪  溺於造化得 乎哉雖然苟能早悟於夢覺則死生之去來亦  不足道矣   穆王下 子列子曰神遇爲夢形接爲事故晝想夜夢神形所遇 故神凝 者想夢自消信覺不語信夢不達物化之往來 者也古之眞人 其覺自忘其寢不夢幾虛語哉
Interpretation

When well-fed, we dream differently than when hungry—this shows how desires influence us. Sometimes we dream of soaring through the skies, other times of drowning—these are signs of illness eroding our spirit (shen). Dreams of serpents or flight reveal how external phenomena disturb our heart-mind.

In cold darkness, one dreams of fire; in sickness, one dreams of food—demonstrating how dreams often invert reality. The intoxicated may sing in sorrow, dancers may weep mid-performance—proof that joy and grief transform into one another. Human life is fleeting, split evenly between day and night. Without preserving pure primordial qi, we fluctuate with time, assailed day and night by the interplay of yin-yang and the myriad phenomena. The body toils without rest, the spirit (shen) depletes endlessly—a lifetime of busyness ending in dissolution with all things. Should this not awaken our vigilance?

Studying the principles of waking and dreaming is as natural as observing day and night. Though dreams manifest through spiritual activity, they're ultimately driven by the body. Yet this bodily influence isn't autonomous—we ourselves permit the body to dominate us. In dreams we don't know we're dreaming; awakening reveals the truth, yet soon we plunge back into dreams, mistaking them for reality. As days and nights cycle endlessly, humans spend lifetimes between waking and dreaming without grasping the truth. Like our reactions to fire/water or gain/loss—all fundamentally illusory yet capable of stirring real emotions. The awakened recognize dreams, but dreamers can't recognize wakefulness—thus waking is truer. Waking actions remain confined to thought, yet dreams foresee beyond thought—in this sense, dreams prove more numinous. Daily wakefulness follows order, while nightly dreams fracture into discontinuity. The boundary between dream and wake lasts but a moment, yet their difference is vast—how much more so the greater transformation of life and death? Only those who've attained the Dao escape nature's constraints.

Yet understanding the principles of dream and wakefulness early renders life and death's comings and goings insignificant.

(Liezi, "King Mu" chapter, part 2) Liezi said: Spiritual (shen) resonance generates dreams; physical contact creates facts. Thus daytime thoughts become nighttime dreams—this is the mutual interaction of spirit and form. Those whose spirit remains focused find illusions and dreams naturally vanish. The truly awakened speak no empty words; those who truly understand dreams chase no illusions. The ancient perfected persons (zhenren), awake forgot themselves, asleep dreamed nothing—could this be mere talk?

 解曰晝之想夜之夢夢也魂交覺也形開晝夜迭運物化往  來猶如空華隨起隨滅故信覺者不可以語道信 夢者不可  以爲達雖然神形所遇雖合於物究其所生咸其自造故夫  想夢之顚倒與夫想夢之自爲非 有佗也亦在夫神之凝不  凝而巳所謂眞人者不離於精而其神凝者也不知悅生不  知惡死其出不訢 其入不拒不以心捐道不以人助天翛然  而往翛然而來不逐於物化之往來而於夢覺都無所信者   也故能其覺自忘而其寢不夢也 西極之南隅有國焉不知境界之所接名古莽之國陰 陽之氣 所不交故寒暑亡辯日月之光所不照故晝夜 亡辯其民不食 不衣而多眠五旬一覺以夢中所爲者 實覺之所見者妄四海 之齊謂中央之國跨河南北越 岱東西萬有餘里其陰陽之審 度故一寒一暑昏明之 分察故一晝一夜其民有智有愚萬物 滋殖才藝多方 有君臣相臨禮法相持其所云爲不可稱計一 覺一寐 以爲覺之所爲者實夢之所見者妄東極之北隅有國 曰阜落之國其上氣常燠日月餘光之照其土不生嘉 苗其民 食草根木實不知火食性剛悍彊弱相藉貴勝 而不尙義多馳 步少休息常覺而不眠  解曰西極之南隅坤兌之方也萬物由坤之致役而趨悅息
Interpretation

Both waking thoughts during the day and dreams at night are activities of the spirit (Shen). When people dream, their hun (ethereal soul) and po (corporeal soul) interact; when awake, their physical form stretches freely. The alternation of day and night operates continuously, while the transformations and movements of all things resemble illusory flowers in the sky—appearing and vanishing spontaneously. Thus, those attached to wakefulness cannot comprehend the great Dao (the Way), and those lost in dreams cannot penetrate the principles of reality.

Although both human spirit and physical form interact with external phenomena, their root lies in creations of self-awareness. Therefore, neither the deluded thoughts of wakefulness nor the self-directed actions of dreams are caused by external factors—the key lies solely in whether the spirit remains focused and concentrated. The so-called "perfected person" (zhenren), one who has attained the Dao, never departs from the source of life, their spirit perpetually gathered. They neither cling to life nor despise death; they neither rejoice at birth nor resist demise. They do not use human will to oppose the Dao of Heaven, nor do they employ artificial means to interfere with nature. Coming and going freely, they remain unbound by the transformations of all things, unattached to either dreams or wakefulness. Thus, they forget themselves when awake and experience no dreams when asleep.

Far to the west, in the southernmost region, lies the ancient land of Gummang, where the two energies of yin and yang do not intermingle, resulting in no alternation of cold and heat. The light of sun and moon does not reach there, so there is no distinction between day and night. The people neither eat nor wear clothes, spending most of their time asleep—waking only once every fifty days. They consider their dream experiences real and regard waking perceptions as illusory.

At the center of the Four Seas lies the Central Kingdom, spanning the Yellow River north and south, crossing Mount Tai east and west, covering over ten thousand li in circumference. Here, yin and yang harmonize distinctly, producing the cycle of seasons; the boundary between day and night is clear, manifesting sunrise and sunset. The people vary in wisdom and folly, all things flourish and multiply, talents and skills abound, and hierarchies of ruler and subject are maintained through rituals and laws—daily activities too numerous to count. They regard waking actions as real and dream visions as illusory.

Far to the east, in the northernmost region, lies the land of Fuluo, where the climate is perpetually scorching, illuminated only by the residual light of sun and moon. The land yields no bountiful crops, so the people eat roots and wild fruits, never cooking with fire. Their temperament is fierce and unyielding—the strong prey on the weak—valorizing martial prowess over moral righteousness. They are constantly active, rarely resting, and remain mostly awake with little sleep.

Commentary: The southernmost region of the west corresponds to the kun and dui positions in the Bagua (Eight Trigrams)—kun symbolizing earth and dui representing marsh. All things follow the principle of earth's nurturing embrace, tending toward stillness and rest.

 之兌故其國以夢之所爲者爲實謂之古莽之國 則其道廣  莫自古以固存也是亦西南之類也東極之北隅艮震之方  也萬物由艮之徑路而達乎震之 大塗方將趨於相見之離  故俗常覺而不眠謂之阜落之國則以物生阜而爲聚落也  是亦東北之類也 中央之國陰陽審度故一晝一夜一寒一  暑以覺爲實以夢爲妄凡皆不能逃陰陽之變耳 周之尹氏大治産其下趣役者侵晨昏而弗息有老役 夫筋力 竭矣而使之彌勤晝則呻呼而卽事夜則昏憊 而熟寐精神荒 散昔昔夢爲國君居人民之上總一國 之事遊燕宮觀恣意所 欲其樂無比覺則復役人有慰 喻其懃者役夫曰人生百年晝 夜各分吾晝爲僕虜苦 則苦矣夜則人君其樂無比何所怨哉 尹氏心營世事 慮鍾家業心形俱疲夜亦昏憊而寐昔昔夢爲 人僕趨 走作役無不爲也數駡杖撻無不至也眠中啽囈呻呼 徹旦息焉尹氏病之以訪其友友曰若位足榮身資財 有餘勝 人遠矣夜夢爲僕苦逸之復數之常也若欲覺 夢兼之豈可得 耶尹氏聞其友言寬其役夫之程減已 思慮之事疾並少間
Interpretation

The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing (Scripture of the Ultimate Virtue of Profound Emptiness) describes the characteristics of several distinct nations. The people of Gumang Country in the southwest regard events in dreams as reality, believing this to reflect ancient ways. In contrast, the inhabitants of Fuluo Country in the northeast remain perpetually awake without sleep, as their land's abundant resources allow for communal living. The Central Kingdom follows the balanced principles of Yin-Yang, with alternating day and night, warmth and cold. There, people consider waking experiences real and dreams illusory—all governed by the cyclical transformations of Yin and Yang.

The text then recounts the story of a Zhou dynasty man named Yin, who busied himself managing his estate while his servants toiled from dawn till dusk without rest. One elderly servant, utterly exhausted, groaned through his daytime labor but would collapse into deep sleep at night, often dreaming he was a monarch enjoying luxury and power—only to wake and resume his drudgery. When others consoled him, he replied: "A human life spans a hundred years. Though I suffer as a slave by day, my nights as a king bring joy. What grievance could I hold?"

Yin himself, consumed by household worries, grew physically and mentally drained. At night, he suffered nightmares of being a servant—beaten, scolded, and groaning until dawn. Troubled, he sought advice from a friend, who said: "Your noble status and wealth far surpass others'. That you dream of servitude at night simply reflects the natural alternation of suffering and joy. How could one claim all blessings?" Taking this counsel, Yin lightened his servants' burdens and eased his own anxieties, gradually recovering his health.

Through this juxtaposition of dreams and reality, the parable illustrates how life's joys and sorrows follow natural patterns. Excessive pursuit of one extreme leads to imbalance, while measured adjustment brings harmony to body and mind.

 解曰晝夜各分形神迭用晝勞於神者其形則佚故夜則神  佚而形勞晝勞其形者其神則佚故夜則神勞而 形佚此陰  陽消長物極則反之道也尹氏與其僕所以有苦佚之復而  不得兼於覺夢也昧者不察夫盈 虛之理信覺爲實以夢爲  妄知趨於晝之利害而不暇知夢之苦佚殊不悟使夢而無  知則可矣夢而有 知則哀樂欲惡不殊於覺又安可以爲妄  哉尹氏知以是爲疾而訪其友是或神者先受之也至於能  寛 其役夫之程減已思慮之事疾並少間則其理誠可信矣  如俾其誠之不已於已思慮損之又損則至神 可凝想夢自  消奚止其疾少間而已哉 鄭人有薪於野者遇駭鹿御而擊之斃之恐人見之也 遽而藏 諸隍中覆之以蕉不勝其喜俄而遺其所藏之 處遂以爲夢焉 順塗而詠其事傍人有聞者用其言而 取之旣歸告其室人曰 向薪者夢得鹿而不知其處吾 今得之彼直眞夢者矣室人曰 若將是夢見薪者之得 鹿耶詎有薪者耶今眞得鹿是若之夢 眞耶夫曰吾據 得鹿何用知彼夢我夢耶薪者之歸不厭失鹿 其夜眞 夢藏之之處又夢得之之主爽旦按所夢而尋得之遂
Interpretation

This passage explores the alternating relationship between form (xing) and spirit (shen), and the interplay between waking reality and dreams through two illustrative stories.

In the cycle of day and night, human physical form and spiritual consciousness alternate their activity. Those who excessively engage their shen (spiritual activity) during the day allow their physical form to rest, hence at night their spirit rests while the body moves. Conversely, those who exhaust their physical form by day experience heightened spiritual activity at night while their body recuperates. This follows the natural principle of Yin-Yang waxing and waning, where things reverse upon reaching their extremes. The story of Yin Xi (Laozi's disciple) and his servant demonstrates this alternation of labor and rest, yet their inability to harmonize waking and dreaming states stems from failing to comprehend this principle.

Some fail to perceive the patterns of growth and decline in phenomena, believing only waking consciousness to be real while dismissing dreams as illusory. They pursue worldly gains during daylight hours yet remain ignorant of the joys and sorrows experienced in dreams. If dreams were truly devoid of perception it might not matter, but since dreams contain the full spectrum of emotions—joy, anger, grief, pleasure—how can we simplistically deem them false? When Yin Xi came to understand this truth and consulted his friend, it was likely his primordial spirit (yuanshen, the innate consciousness) that first attained this realization. Subsequently, by reducing his servant's labor and lessening his own mental preoccupations, his ailments improved. This illustrates how progressively diminishing mental activity—reaching the cultivation state of "diminishing and diminishing again"—allows the primordial spirit to consolidate, causing dreams to naturally dissolve rather than merely alleviating symptoms.

The second story tells of a Zheng woodcutter who, while gathering firewood, encountered a startled deer. After killing it, he hid the carcass in a ditch beneath plantain leaves, fearing discovery. Though initially elated, he soon forgot the hiding place and assumed it had been a dream. As he muttered about this on his way home, a passerby overheard and retrieved the deer. The man told his wife: "A woodcutter dreamed of catching a deer but didn't know where it was—now I've found it, proving his dream was real." His wife countered: "Did you dream of a woodcutter getting a deer? Was there truly a woodcutter? Now that we have the deer, who exactly was dreaming?" The husband replied: "The deer is in my hands—why concern ourselves with whose dream it was?" Meanwhile, the woodcutter, unwilling to accept the loss, dreamed that night of both the hiding place and the man who took his deer. Upon waking, he followed his dream's guidance and successfully reclaimed his prize.

Both narratives examine the porous boundary between waking and dreaming, illustrating the Daoist perspective that both states are manifestations of consciousness not requiring rigid distinction. Through cultivation practices that reduce mental agitation, one may transcend the duality of waking and dreaming altogether.

訟而爭之歸之士師士師曰若初眞得鹿妄謂之夢眞 夢得鹿 妄謂之實彼眞取若鹿而與若爭鹿室人又謂 夢認人鹿無人 得鹿今據有此鹿請二分之以聞鄭君 鄭君曰嘻士師將復夢 分人鹿乎訪之國相國相曰夢 與不夢臣所不能辯也欲辯覺 夢唯黃帝孔邱今亡黃 帝孔邱孰辯之哉且恂士師之言可 也  解曰人之常情信覺爲實以其形之所接也謂夢爲妄以其  魂之所交也今焉覺之所爲而忘之不幾於夢乎 夢之所遇  而有實不幾於覺乎蓋覺之所爲每出於有心故易以忘神  之所遇或出於無心故夢則靈要 其夢覺初無二致冥之則  俱眞辯之則俱妄如認夢爲實方其夢時奚不知其爲夢以  覺爲實則旣已覺 矣奚爲復有夫夢斯人之生適居中央之  國故其於夢覺别之如此如以夢覺之理語諸古莽阜落之  民 則其是非特未可定也鄭之薪者其初以實爲夢終則以  夢爲實取鹿者用其言而以爲夢取其鹿而爭 其鹿夢覺雜  揉眞僞交馳是非相虀此所以必有訟也士師聽其訟而折  之者也將以取鹿者爲是則鹿 本薪者之有謂薪者爲是則  尋而得之蓋出於夢是非樊然莫知其辯據鹿而二分之安  可以爲聽訟之 善乎此鄭君聞之所以歎而訪之國相也然  而覺夢之理平分晝夜信覺不語信夢不達唯黃帝孔子能
Interpretation

This passage recounts a famous case from the State of Zheng concerning the boundary between dreams and reality, embodying profound Daoist philosophy.

A woodcutter claimed to have hunted a deer and hidden it, only to later forget the hiding place and assume it was just a dream. Another man, overhearing the woodcutter's sleep-talking, found the deer. When the two men disputed ownership, even the judge (Shishi) couldn't determine the truth and suggested splitting the deer in half. Upon hearing this, the ruler of Zheng sighed: "Is the judge also dividing deer in a dream?" Consulting his prime minister, he received the reply: "Only the Yellow Emperor (Huangdi) and Confucius could distinguish dreams from waking reality. Since they're no longer with us, let's follow the judge's decision."

The text observes: People generally consider waking experiences real and dream experiences illusory. Yet we often forget things done while awake—isn't this just like dreams? Sometimes dream experiences feel intensely real—doesn't this resemble waking life? The key lies in how conscious actions during wakefulness are easily forgotten, while unconscious dream experiences often feel more vivid. Fundamentally, there's no difference between dreaming and waking—insisting on distinguishing them is itself delusion.

The author continues: We Central Plains people obsess over distinguishing dreams from wakefulness, but if we explained this concept to people from remote regions (like the ancient Mang and Fu Luo tribes), they might completely disagree. In this case, the woodcutter first mistook reality for a dream, then dreams for reality; the deer-taker exploited his words to present reality as a dream. Truth and falsehood, right and wrong became so entangled that legal arbitration became necessary.

The passage concludes: Those truly enlightened understand day and night each claim half of existence—privileging wakefulness over dreams or vice versa are both mistaken. Only sages like the Yellow Emperor and Confucius truly comprehend this principle. This reflects the Daoist philosophy of "equalizing all things" (Qi Wu Lun), which maintains that dreams and wakefulness, truth and illusion, are ultimately relative states.

 辯其然耳非黃帝孔子則是非安可以據而折之哉然則士  師之二分其鹿雖爲之不得已要其至則二 分之者其於覺  夢都無所信而無所不信者也雖未至於想夢自消可謂能  任之矣且恂士師之言不亦 可乎士師法之所在也凡有形  有名而以法爲分者是非紛然莫適爲可皆爲之於且然而  已不得已而 可乎可不亦可乎 宋陽里華子中年病忘朝取而夕忘夕與而朝忘在塗 則忘行 在室則忘坐今不識先後不識今闔室毒之謁 史而卜之弗占 謁巫而禱之弗禁謁醫而攻之弗已魯 有儒生自媒能治之華 子之妻子以居産之半請其方 儒生曰此固非卦兆之所占非 祈請之所禱非藥石之 所攻吾試化其心變其慮庶幾其瘳乎 於是試露之而 求衣饑之而求食幽之而求明儒生欣然告其 子曰疾 可已也然吾之方密傳世不以告人試屏左右獨與居 室七日從之莫知其所施爲也而積年之疾一朝都除  解曰理涉於情僞則卦兆可占爲見於利害則祈請可禱疾  得於嗜欲則藥石可攻迷忘之疾蕩蕩然不覺天 地之有無  又何占相祈禱藥石之所能已乎露之而求衣未能忘寒暑  也饑之而求食未能忘形體也幽 之而求明未能忘好惡也
Interpretation

This passage presents two allegorical tales about cognition and healing.

The first story illustrates how standards for judging right and wrong are difficult to establish. Like two officials dividing a deer—while appearing to be a necessary compromise—both parties exist in a semi-conscious state, neither fully believing nor fully doubting. Though not yet reaching complete transcendence, this approach to conflict resolution is still commendable. While all concrete things have their proper classifications and rules, using these standards to determine truth can lead to endless disputes.

The second tale tells of a middle-aged man named Hua Zi from Yangli in the Song state who suffered from amnesia. He would forget by evening what he'd taken in the morning, lose his destination while walking, and forget to sit down at home. His family consulted diviners, summoned shamans for prayers, and sought medical treatment—all to no avail. Eventually a Confucian scholar claimed he could cure it, demanding half the family's wealth as payment. The scholar explained this illness couldn't be treated by divination, prayers or medicine—it required transforming the patient's consciousness. He subjected Hua Zi to various deprivations: letting him freeze to recognize the need for clothing, starve to understand hunger, and sit in darkness to value light. After seven days of solitary confinement, the chronic condition miraculously disappeared.

The commentary explains: Conditions involving human emotions respond to divination; matters of benefit and harm may yield to prayers; illnesses from cravings can be medicated. But this profound amnesia—where even the existence of heaven and earth went unfelt—naturally resisted such methods. Only by reawakening fundamental needs could primal instincts be restored. This demonstrates how some ailments require treatment at the root level of consciousness.

 由是知華子之忘特以疾而有所蔽爾非眞能忘世態者故  儒生欣然知其疾 之可已也如眞忘者雖造化亦末如之何  矣豈儒生淺術之所能已哉儒以詩禮發塜最爲害道之大  原 者其所以使斯民離實學僞亦有以密移而罔覺之使人  由之而不知也故自以謂其方密傳世必屏左 右而獨與居  也與之居七日則混沌死而視聽食息均於人矣故積年之  疾一朝都除 華子旣悟迺大怒黜妻罰子操戈逐儒生宋人執而問 其故華 子曰曩吾忘也蕩蕩然不覺天地之有無今頓 識旣往數十年 來存亡得失哀樂好惡擾擾萬緒起矣 吾恐將來之存亡得失 哀樂好惡之亂吾心如此也須 臾之忘可復得乎子貢聞而怪 之以告孔子孔子曰此 非汝所及乎顧謂顔回記之  解曰眞之難遇而僞之易以亂人也久矣所樂在於眞則萬  物不足以易其好雖妻子之愛爲可割矣所物不 足以擬其  尊雖儒生之道不足守矣故華子旣悟則黜妻罰子操戈逐  儒生也華子知忘之爲可樂則宜 於世累能忘之而弗念矣  猶恐外物之亂其心而不復得須臾之忘又况於初不知忘  之爲可樂而日趨 於是非之塗若華氏方且以華子之忘爲  闔室之毒儒生方且欣其疾之可已則其心之淆亂何如耶   所謂宋陽里華子者陽則以生育長養爲事華則得陽而蕃
Interpretation

This passage reveals that Hua Zi's "forgetfulness" was actually a symptom of illness-induced cognitive impairment, not a genuine transcendence of worldly concerns. That's why the Confucian scholar was overjoyed to discover his condition could be cured. Had it been true enlightenment beyond worldly attachments, not even the Creator could have intervened—how could such shallow medical skills of a Confucian possibly remedy it?

The text sharply criticizes Confucianism for using its system of poetry, books, and rituals to "dig people's graves" (a metaphor for destroying natural human nature), identifying it as the deepest root of harm to the Dao (the Way). This Confucian doctrine leads people away from genuine learning toward hypocrisy, subtly causing them to lose themselves without realizing it. The Confucian scholar even considered his method profound, insisting on treating the patient alone. After seven days, Hua Zi's originally natural, undisturbed state was disrupted—he regained ordinary human desires like seeing, hearing, and eating. Though cured of his long-standing illness in a single day, he lost something far more precious.

Upon realizing this, Hua Zi flew into a rage, punishing his wife and children while chasing the Confucian scholar with weapons. When questioned by the people of Song, he explained: "In my forgetful state, my mind was so clear and empty I couldn't even perceive whether heaven and earth existed. Now suddenly regaining memory, decades of gains and losses, survival and death, joy and anger all flooded back. I fear these worldly thoughts will continue disturbing my mind—can that fleeting clarity ever return?"

When Zi Gong heard this and found it strange, he reported it to Confucius, who replied this realm was beyond his understanding and had Yan Hui record it. The commentary notes: True nature is hard to encounter, while hypocrisy has long corrupted people. Those who truly delight in their original essence remain unmoved by all things—even family bonds can be relinquished. Such genuine nobility is incomparable; Confucian teachings aren't worth clinging to. Hence Hua Zi punished his family and expelled the scholar upon awakening.

Originally, Hua Zi recognized the value of "forgetfulness," having transcended worldly ties. Now he fears external distractions may forever deny him inner peace—how much worse for those ignorant of forgetfulness's joy, constantly entangled in right and wrong? Hua Zi's family saw his forgetfulness as a curse, and the scholar celebrated its "cure"—how confused their minds must be!

The name "Hua Zi of Yangli in Song" carries symbolic meaning: "Yang" represents growth and nourishment, while "Hua" (flourishing) suggests prosperity through yang qi (vital energy). This implies Hua Zi should have maintained his natural state of growth, but was forcibly "cured," losing his original authentic realm.

 鮮是皆趨於擾擾之塗者也中年病忘則落其 華而反本焉  及其旣悟則復趨於膠擾之塗矣反常者兌之悅澤生出者  震之決躁故華子旣悟迺大怒 也子貢居言語之科方且以  賢於方人見斥於孔子若顔子則能忘仁義忘禮樂屢進而  至於坐忘矣故 孔子顧謂顔回記之 秦人逢氏有子少而慧及壯而有迷罔之疾聞歌以爲 哭視白 以爲黑饗香以爲朽嘗甘以爲苦行非以爲是 意之所之天地 四方水火寒暑無不倒錯者焉楊氏告 其父曰魯之君子多術 藝將能已乎汝奚不訪焉其父 之魯過陳遇老聃因告其子之 證老聃曰汝庸知汝子 之迷乎今天下之人皆惑於是非昏於 利害同疾者多 固莫有覺者且一身之迷不足傾一家一家之 迷不足 傾一鄕一鄕之迷不足傾一國一國之迷不足傾天下 天下盡迷孰傾之哉向使天下之人其心盡如汝子汝 則反迷 矣哀樂聲色臭味是非孰能正之  解曰歌哭白黑香臭甘苦至於天地四方水火寒暑紛紛之  名同一妙本初無二致由彼妄情有於愛惡物物 分(辯種種)  假名尋名求實執著不易莫有覺者卽其一端而論之以白  爲白是從眾也以白爲黑是從我 也從我則眾疑從眾則我  惑彼我異言白黑殊名名言雖殊體性不動是以名言之異  眾寡相傾寡不敵 眾以迷導迷淪胥以溺而不反矣安可遽
Interpretation

This passage discusses how people are often deluded by worldly distractions, while Daoist practitioners can perceive the true essence by returning to simplicity.

The first part describes how Hua Zi, a Daoist cultivator, regained his original nature through forgetfulness in middle age, but after awakening, became entangled in worldly affairs again. Confucius criticized his disciple Zi Gong for being fond of judging others, while Yan Hui, Confucius' most admired disciple, transcended the concepts of benevolence, righteousness, and ritual music to attain the state of "sitting in forgetfulness" (zuowang, a Daoist cultivation state of transcending external things and forgetting both self and objects).

The latter part uses the story of Feng's son from Qin to illustrate universal human confusion: this intelligent child developed cognitive distortions upon growing up, mistaking singing for weeping, white for black, and fragrance for stench. Laozi (Lao Dan) points out that today everyone in the world similarly fails to distinguish right from wrong or benefit from harm—all are pathologically attached to superficial appearances. If the whole world shared your son's "inverted" perceptions, that would ironically become the norm.

The concluding explanation reveals that distinctions between singing and weeping, black and white, or fragrance and stench all originate from artificial conceptual divisions. Those attached to names and concepts are like people insisting "white is black"—contrary to common perception. Yet whether conforming to majority views or stubbornly clinging to personal opinions, both represent forms of delusion. True wisdom transcends these dualistic concepts to recognize the fundamental unity of all things.

 以眾人之同疾爲是一人之獨覺者爲非耶楊氏以爲我之  道 傾天下方且與儒墨相爲是非白黑故爲逢氏病之而俾  之訪於魯之多術者逢氏則逢物而偶之者也 故少而慧長  而以迷罔爲疾 且吾之此言未必非迷而况魯之君子迷之郵者焉能 解人之 迷哉榮汝之糧不若遄而歸也  解曰天下本無正是大道不涉言詮但聖人垂世立教者不  免於云云耳又恐學者以眾人之言爲非而以聖 人之言爲  是遂認而不捨守而不忘諺所謂黃金雖貴入眼成瞖故老  子曰吾之此言未必非迷况魯之 君子立仁義忠信之教垂  詩書禮樂之文迷中之最迷者又安能解人之迷哉榮汝之  糧不若遄歸蓋使 之返照求之於內耳 燕人生於燕長於楚及老而還本國過晉國同行者誑 之指城 曰此燕國之城其人愀然變容指社曰此若里 之社乃喟然而 歎指舍曰此若先人之廬乃涓然而泣 指壠曰此若先人之冢 其人哭不自禁同行者啞然大 笑曰予昔紿若此晉國耳其人 大慙及至燕眞見燕國 之城社眞見先人之廬冢悲心更微  解曰傳教者有眞僞受道者有先後先入者爲主後入者爲  客今之學者先遇一師傳以僞法遂認而守之謂 其無以復  加矣數年之後忽遇眞師傳以眞理反執而不信至於終身
Interpretation

This passage discusses the limitations of human understanding and the pursuit of truth.

Yang Zhu (a Daoist thinker) believed his teachings could rectify the world, yet he became entangled in debates over right and wrong with Confucians and Mohists. Feng Meng (a figure mentioned here) grew concerned about this and traveled to the state of Lu to consult various scholars. However, Feng himself was someone who made judgments based on fleeting impressions—clever as a child, but in adulthood, he mistook confusion for illness.

The author reflects: Even these words of mine may be deluded views, let alone the Confucian scholars of Lu, who are most deeply entrenched in establishing doctrines of benevolence, righteousness, loyalty, and trust, as well as the rigid norms of poetry, history, rites, and music. How could they possibly help others dispel confusion? Rather than carrying provisions to seek teachings far and wide, it would be better to return home quickly and reflect inwardly.

The commentary explains: The world has no absolute truth, and the great Dao (the Way) transcends verbal expression. The sages established teachings out of necessity, yet scholars often mistake the words of the masses for error and the words of sages for truth, clinging stubbornly to them. As the proverb says, "Even gold, though precious, will dazzle the eyes if stared at too long." Thus, Laozi said his own words might well be deluded—how much more so the Confucian scholars who establish doctrines of benevolence and righteousness? They are the most deeply deluded—how could they help others dispel confusion? The phrase "better to return home quickly" urges people to turn inward and reflect.

Later, the passage uses a parable of a man from Yan: A man from Yan grew up in the state of Chu. In his old age, on his way back home, he passed through the state of Jin. His companions deceived him, saying the cities, ancestral temples, houses, and graves of Jin were those of Yan. Believing them, he wept in sorrow. When he realized the deception, he felt ashamed. Yet when he finally returned to Yan and saw the real sights of his homeland, he was no longer as grief-stricken.

The commentary explains: Some who transmit the Dao are genuine, others false; some students encounter it early, others late. What one learns first often becomes a fixed view, making it hard to accept the truth encountered later. Many scholars today first meet false teachers and learn erroneous methods, stubbornly believing them to be the best. Years later, when they encounter a true master who imparts the genuine Dao, they refuse to believe it—thus missing the opportunity for a lifetime.

 不悟良可悲哉故禦㓂設此燕人 過晉之喻斯人也生於燕  而長於楚旣老而歸過於晉國同行者誑之曰此燕之城也  其人愀然變容指 社曰此若里之社也乃喟然而歎指舍曰  此若先人之廬也乃涓然而泣指壠曰此若先人之墳墓也  乃 哭不自禁同行者啞然而大笑曰此晉國也向吾紿若其  人大慙及至燕國眞見先人之廬冢悲心遂消 沉而不能更  發矣蓋境之感人初見則動情也深再見則視猶平常且父  母之邦本以樂生也今愈近而 愈蹙終至於涕泣而止爾何  生之樂哉又其所謂燕者初非燕國實晉城爾彼以僞紿眞  此以眞信妄自 紿之者以觀眞足資其獻笑爾由是知人之  所謂內外親疎喜怒哀樂未有不猶燕人之紿也從而親疎  憂樂之亦未有不見笑於造物者猶燕之人也如亦悟其不  眞則亦必思其當悲憂之時何至而能爾也 然而親疎不在  物而在我眞僞不在境而在心心眞則雖僞亦眞心惑則雖  眞亦僞向俾晉人終不自言 其紿則燕人之情終亦不易矣  及知其爲紿雖眞見先人之廬冢悲心更微矣何則人之心  未始不眞一 誘於人僞欲復於眞不可得矣是以燕之人眞  情一散漫不可復其後彼雖以誠而來我亦審其無妄矣
Interpretation

This passage recounts a parable: A man from the state of Yan (modern-day Beijing region) grew up in the state of Chu (modern-day Hubei and Hunan). In his old age, while returning home through the state of Jin (modern-day Shanxi), his companions deceived him into believing they had already reached Yan. Mistaking a local earth-god shrine for his hometown temple, he sighed deeply; taking unfamiliar houses for his ancestral home, he wept; and seeing random burial mounds, he wailed as if they were his forebears' graves. When his companions laughed and revealed they were still in Jin, the man was mortified. Later, upon truly returning to Yan and witnessing his actual ancestral home and graves, he found his grief had dissipated and could no longer be summoned.

Through this allegory, the author illustrates several truths: First, human emotional responses to environments are often governed by first impressions (initial encounters stir strong feelings, while subsequent ones grow muted). Second, people frequently mistake falsehood for reality (taking Jin’s capital for Yan’s) and reality for illusion (failing to grieve when truly home). Third, all emotions of attachment or aversion—like the Yan man’s deceived sorrow—are fundamentally subjective. The crux lies in the human heart: when sincere, even illusions evoke genuine feeling; when deluded, even reality seems false. Had his companions not exposed the lie, the man’s grief might have persisted longer. The innate purity of the heart, once clouded by deception, struggles to regain its original clarity. Like the Yan man, once true emotion fades, even genuine scenes later fail to rekindle the initial intensity of feeling.

(Note: "She" refers to earth-god shrines; "village she" means the local earth-god temple of one’s hometown; "ancestral home" denotes family dwellings; "burial mounds" indicate graves.)

欲  强之悲終亦弗能矣可不愼哉嘗原老列之教大抵期鎭斯  民以無名之樸使之不蕩於僞而已不以治斯民於旣澆漓  之後爲教也故道經終言無名之樸亦將不欲以靜天下將  自正而穆王之篇終之以此 也   穆王解 由皇而下至於王功雖曰道之屢降要帝王之應世咸本於道 皆聖人之所爲也特其因時適變居帝者之世不得不爲帝功 至王者之時不得不爲王業爾治至於 王功而末矣雖賢人可 久之德亦庶幾及之矣故禹湯文武同爲王功啟之賢亦足以 承禹之道成王之中才 亦能持守文武之業也至於穆王道不 足以傳化人之妙不盈於德而諧於樂周道自是而衰矣於帝 言其盛 於王言其衰始終之理也且五帝之德三王之功其道 密庸或由幻化直若一夢爾故此篇劇言覺夢之理有 若古莽 之國以夢中所爲爲實者有若阜落之民常覺而不眠者役思 慮於晝則昔昔夢爲人僕勞形體於晝
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the core Daoist philosophy of governing the world. The teachings of Laozi and Liezi fundamentally rely on using the "nameless simplicity" (referring to the natural, authentic state of the Dao) to pacify the people, preventing them from being deluded by falsehood and superficiality, rather than attempting governance only after social customs have already deteriorated. Thus, the Daode Jing ultimately emphasizes "nameless simplicity," expressing the hope that the world may return to a state of natural tranquility, where all things will naturally align with the proper path.

From the ancient sage-kings to later monarchs, although the manifestation of the Dao gradually diminished, rulers throughout history governed the world based on the Dao, all embodying the actions of sages. However, as times changed, emperors performed the deeds appropriate to their era, and feudal lords carried out the responsibilities suited to their time. By the reign of King Mu of Zhou, moral instruction was no longer sufficient to transmit the subtleties of Daoist wisdom. With virtue insufficient and indulgence in pleasure prevailing, the fortunes of the Zhou dynasty began their decline from this point.

The virtue of the Five Emperors and the achievements of the Three Kings may appear lofty, yet in reality, they are as illusory as dreams and bubbles. The text specifically mentions the people of the "Land of Ancient Wilderness" who regard dreams as reality, and the "People of Fuluo" who remain perpetually awake without sleep. These examples illustrate how people toil and labor during the day, only to dream at night of becoming servants to others—all revealing the truth that all phenomena in the world are as fleeting and insubstantial as dreams.

則昔昔夢爲人君至於 爭鹿之訟則覺夢又不可得而辯矣聖人應世之跡如斯而已 誠能審覺夢之道則知 病迷者非本迷病忘者非本忘是非美 惡同之於道道化德業同於一致其塵垢粃糠足以陶鑄堯舜 而有餘 而况於王功乎嘗原天下之治始於三皇方是時也以 道在宥天下民結繩而用之卧則居居起則于于可謂 至治矣 然旣已出道而爲治矣則時運而往必降而爲帝者之德帝者 之治若黃帝堯舜垂衣裳而天下治亦 已盛矣然德已顯矣必 至於湯武之王人皆知王者之功見於夏禹之時殊不知其開 端乃自於三皇之前而 其末存乎千嵗之後也故譬道之每降 猶水之離源其流無已去本日遠必不可復反矣莊子謂有虞 氏爲招仁 義以撓天下謂聖人爲不忍一世之傷而謷萬世之 患蓋謂此也雖然有聖人者能以道御時不隨世降雖 成周之 王可使民之攸墍不殊於至德之世此則子列子之垂訓有望 於萬世旦暮之遇也 重刋道藏輯要  冲虛至德眞經 周列禦 寇著 宋杭州州學內舍生江遹解   仲尼 仲尼閒居子貢入侍而有憂色子貢不敢問
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Daoist understanding of governance. In ancient times, people would dream of becoming rulers, yet upon waking couldn't even distinguish truth from falsehood in disputes over deer. The sage's method of governing the world follows the same principle—if one comprehends the relationship between dreaming and waking, they realize that so-called confusion and forgetfulness are not fundamental issues.

At the level of the Dao (the Way), distinctions between right/wrong and good/evil become unified. What appears as useless dross and chaff actually holds greater value than the achievements of Yao and Shun, let alone the accomplishments of ordinary kings and lords. Tracing the origins of great governance, we find its beginnings in the era of the Three Sovereigns (Fuxi, Shennong, and the Yellow Emperor), when the world was governed through the Dao. People tied knots to record events and lived in peaceful contentment—this represents the most perfect form of governance.

However, after this golden age of Dao-governance, as eras changed, governance gradually degenerated into mere imperial virtue. During the times of the Yellow Emperor, Yao, and Shun, rulers needed only to fold their hands in their sleeves to maintain peace—already a prosperous age. By the eras of Tang of Shang and King Wu of Zhou, people could only perceive royal achievements without recognizing their origins predating the Three Sovereigns, yet their influence persisted for millennia.

This resembles water flowing from its source—the further it travels, the more impossible return becomes. Zhuangzi criticized Emperor Shun for disrupting the world with artificial benevolence and righteousness, noting how sages, unwilling to see one generation suffer, brought calamity to ten thousand ages—precisely this situation. Yet true sages can harness the Dao to master their era without sinking into worldly currents. Even in governance like the Zhou dynasty's, they enabled people to live in peace, as in the most virtuous golden age. This constitutes the teaching Liezi (Lie Yukou) left for posterity—the hope that ten thousand generations hence might still witness such governance.

Later passages describe Confucius (Zhongni) in quiet retirement, with Zigong attending him yet not daring to inquire about his master's troubled expression. Through comparing governance across different eras, the text illustrates the gradual loss of the Dao and how true sages should transcend temporal limitations.

 解曰退朝曰閒閒居則方退食自公故其憂有在於治天下  遺來世有以見聖人雖閒居乃心罔不在王室其 忠有如此  者問也者心之所欲爲而未達者仲尼之憂雖顏子所未喻  况子貢之弗如哉故不敢問 出告顏囘顏囘援琴而歌孔子聞之果召囘入  解曰囘之援琴而歌欲夫子之聞之也果召入見有以見聖  人之教不倦 問曰若奚獨樂囘曰夫子奚獨憂孔子曰先言爾志曰 吾昔聞 之夫子曰樂天知命故不憂囘所以樂也孔子 愀然有閒曰有 是言哉汝之意失矣此吾昔日之言爾 請以今言爲正也汝徒 知樂天知命之無憂未知樂天 知命有憂之大也  解曰顏子之樂在道孔子之憂以人由眾人以觀唯顏子爲  獨樂由顏子以觀唯孔子爲獨憂天之所與樂之 而不辭謂  之樂天命之所制順之而不逆謂之知命能樂天而不能知  命能知命而不能樂天皆不足以 爲不憂雖樂天知命則窮
Interpretation

This passage recounts a dialogue between Confucius and his disciple Yan Hui (courtesy name Ziyuan) about "joyfully following Heaven and understanding destiny." At the time, Confucius, though retired from court and living in leisure, remained troubled by state affairs—a depth of concern that even a perceptive disciple like Yan Hui initially failed to fully grasp.

Noticing his teacher's preoccupation, Yan Hui deliberately played the qin and sang outside the door. Hearing this, Confucius summoned him and asked, "Why are you alone so joyful?" Yan Hui quoted Confucius's earlier teaching in reply: "Master, you once said, 'He who joyfully follows Heaven and understands destiny is free from sorrow,' hence my joy." Confucius, with a solemn expression, responded: "You've misunderstood. Those were my words of the past, now in need of correction. You recognize that joyfully following Heaven and understanding destiny brings freedom from sorrow, but fail to see that it actually encompasses greater concerns."

Here, two levels of understanding are revealed: Yan Hui's joy lies in apprehending the Dao (comprehending the Way of Heaven), while Confucius's concern stems from his care for all people. To ordinary observers, only Yan Hui appears uniquely content, yet from Yan Hui's perspective, only Confucius carries the world's sorrows in his heart. True "joyful following of Heaven" means gladly accepting Heaven's arrangements; true "understanding destiny" means conforming to its dictates. To only joyfully follow Heaven without understanding destiny, or to only understand destiny without joyful acceptance, falls short of genuine transcendence.

This dialogue illustrates the Confucian wisdom of "harmonizing sorrow and joy"—the sage must possess both the serenity to follow Heaven's mandate and the commitment to care for human affairs. By revising his earlier stance, Confucius reveals to his disciple a higher attitude toward life: while recognizing the natural order of Heaven, one must still maintain profound compassion for the suffering of the world.

 亦樂通亦樂所樂非窮通是所以不憂也顏子得是道矣故  居於人不堪之憂 而能不改其樂也雖然孔子行年六十而  六十化始時所是卒而非之以樂天知命爲不憂始之所是   也以樂天知命爲憂之大今之所言也顏子之於孔子得其  行而未得其所以行所以援琴而歌而不能與 聖人同憂也  且皆聖人之言也豈眞有迕而不合哉因時適變姑請以今  言爲正爾至於眞樂眞知則今 昔之言又烏知其辯 今告若其實修一身任窮達知去來之非我亡變亂於 心慮爾 之所謂樂天知命之無憂也曩吾修詩書正禮 樂將以治天下 遺來世非但修一身治魯國而已而魯 之君臣曰失其序仁義 益衰性情益薄此道不行一國 與當年其如天下與來世矣吾 始知詩書禮樂無救於 治亂而未知所以革之之方此樂天知 命者之所憂雖 然吾得之矣夫樂而知者非古人之所謂樂知 也無樂 無知是眞樂眞知故無所不樂無所不知無所不憂無 所不爲詩書禮樂何棄之有革之何爲  解曰聖也者德之極而道之至也謂之聖人則心凝形釋都  無所愛惜都無所畏忌尙有何憂哉雖仁者猶能 不憂而况  於孔子集聖人之大成者其果有憂乎如未免於有憂則不  可以言聖矣謂聖人爲有憂是不
Interpretation

This passage explores the Daoist ideal of "joyful acceptance of heavenly decree" (乐天知命), illustrated through Confucius and his disciple Yan Hui as exemplars of true wisdom.

Yan Hui grasped this principle, which enabled him to maintain happiness despite living in poverty that others found unbearable. At sixty, Confucius recognized how things he believed right in youth later proved mistaken, ultimately establishing "joyful acceptance of heavenly decree" as the foundation for transcending worry. Though Yan Hui emulated Confucius' behavior, he failed to comprehend its deeper meaning—thus while he could play the zither and sing, he never attained sagehood.

The text observes that sage's teachings may appear contradictory, but merely adapt to changing circumstances. True joy and wisdom, though expressed differently across ages, share the same essence. The key lies in self-cultivation—whether in poverty or prominence, understanding that life, death, and circumstance lie beyond personal control, while maintaining inner peace undisturbed by external changes. This constitutes the true meaning of "joyful acceptance."

The author reflects on having once sought to govern the world and teach posterity through poetry, history, and ritual, only to realize—witnessing Lu State's ritual collapse—that external norms cannot truly address disorder. Authentic "joy" and "knowledge" aren't the superficial pleasures and learning described by ancients, but rather the state of "transcending conventional joy and knowledge" (无乐无知). Achieving this enables universal joy, omniscient understanding, and boundless capability. At this stage, cultural forms require neither rejection nor reform—they're naturally employed with perfect appropriateness.

The conclusion explains that sages (those perfected in Dao and De) attain mental stillness and physical liberation, free from craving or fear—how could anxiety persist? Even benevolent persons overcome worry, let alone Confucius who synthesized all wisdom. To claim sages experience anxiety would disqualify them from sagehood altogether.

知聖人者也今而自以爲  憂之大而形於色者蓋聖人者萬物之所係一化之所待而  自任以天下之重 者也以樂天知命修一身任窮達知去來  之非我止變亂於心慮我則不憂矣安能使斯民皆無憂乎  彼 民未盡無憂則聖人安能獨無憂乎非特憂在於當年其  憂又有及於來世方來之世爲無窮斯民之憂 爲無盡聖人  之憂亦與之爲無盡則其爲憂也不亦大乎又况修詩書正  禮樂將以求治而其道不行以 詩書禮樂爲無救於治亂思  欲革之而未知其方安得而無憂乎何則六經先王之陳迹  也豈其所以跡哉夫跡履之所出而跡豈履哉雖然跡雖不  可守而履亦不可廢也故詩書禮樂棄之則無以爲治卽之  則不能爲治今而以樂天知命爲不憂是併與其履而棄之  矣又何以爲治哉是以謂之樂天未免於有 所樂也謂之知  命未免於有所知也有所樂則必有所憂有所知則必有所  遺唯得所謂眞樂眞知則無 樂無知矣無樂無知則無所不  樂無所不知無所不憂無所不爲憂樂兩忘爲無爲俱遣詩  書禮樂亦不 必棄而革而天下可治來世可遺也此易所謂  鼓萬物而不與聖人同憂也孔子所以删詩定書繫易作 經  諄諄於垂訓者蓋以此也
Interpretation

Here we speak of the sage's realm and concerns. The true sage is one whom all things rely upon and all transformations depend upon—they consciously shoulder the weight of the world's burdens. Sages cultivate themselves through "joyous accord with Heaven and understanding of destiny" (le tian zhi ming), remaining composed whether in poverty or prosperity, recognizing that life, death, and all transitions lie beyond personal control. With their inner being undisturbed by external chaos, they themselves remain free from worry. Yet how could a sage be content with personal peace while allowing the people to remain troubled?

If the common people cannot all be without worries, how could the sage alone remain untroubled? A sage's concerns extend not only to the present age but to endless future generations—so long as the people's anxieties remain unending, the sage's concerns will likewise have no end. Are such concerns not profoundly significant? Moreover, when sages edited the Classics (Shi, Shu, Li, Yue, Yi, Chunqiu) and rectified rituals and music, their purpose was to seek the Dao of governance. But if these methods fail to truly resolve disorder, and reformers find no new direction, how could they not be concerned?

The Six Classics are the traces left by ancient kings—like footprints marking where shoes have passed, yet footprints are not the shoes themselves. While one shouldn't rigidly cling to old traces, neither can one discard the shoes entirely. To abandon the Classics and rituals completely is to lose the foundation of governance; yet to be constrained by them is to fail in actual statecraft. Some today believe that "joyous accord with Heaven and understanding destiny" alone brings freedom from worry—this is equivalent to discarding even the "shoes" themselves. Upon what, then, would governance stand?

Thus we say that "joyous accord" still implies something to rejoice in, and "understanding destiny" still implies something to know—where there is attachment, there will be worry; where there is knowing, there will be omissions. Only by reaching the realm of "true joy and true knowing" can one transcend the duality of "joy and knowing": in the state of no-joy and no-knowing, one paradoxically rejoices in all and knows all; in the worry-free state, one effortlessly accomplishes all. Here, both worry and joy are forgotten, and neither non-action (wuwei) nor action is clung to. Without deliberately discarding the Classics and rituals, nor forcibly instituting reforms, the world naturally becomes well-governed, and later generations naturally find peace. This is the state described in the Yijing (Book of Changes): "Stirring all things to movement yet sharing no common worries with the sages." It is also the profound intent behind Confucius' editing of the Classics—through transformative teaching, enabling later generations to realize this truth beyond dualities.

顏回北面拜手曰囘亦得之矣出告子貢子貢茫然自 失歸家 淫思七日不寢不食以至骨立顏囘重往喻之 乃反邱門絃歌 誦書終身不輟  解曰顏子嘗請行於孔子而將之衞矣孔子以爲若殆往而  刑爾是或未得所謂樂天知命有憂之大而然歟 至於謂其  用之則行捨之則藏同於孔子其以有得於此而然爾至於  子貢雖曰智足以知聖人於聖人 之天道則不得而聞也故  至此則茫然自失雖然深思厯時而不變至於不寢不食而  骨立則都忘我體 融會於理可告以聖人之道矣故一得顏  子之喻則釋然反夫子之門終其身焉絃歌則得其樂誦書   則亦知詩書之不必棄也 陳大夫聘魯私見叔孫氏叔孫氏曰吾國有聖人曰非 孔邱耶 曰是也何以知其聖乎叔孫氏曰吾常聞之顏 囘曰孔邱能廢 心而用形陳大夫曰吾國亦有聖人子 弗知乎曰聖人孰謂曰 老聃之弟子有亢倉子者得聃 之道能以耳視而目聽魯侯聞 之大驚使上卿厚禮而 致之亢倉子應聘而至魯侯卑辭請問 之亢倉子曰傳 之者妄我能視聽不用耳目不能易耳目之用 魯侯曰 此增異矣其道奈何寡人終願聞之
Interpretation

Yan Hui (a disciple of Confucius) knelt facing north and bowed, saying: "I have also attained realization." He then went out and told Zigong (another disciple), who upon hearing this became utterly disoriented. Returning home, Zigong immersed himself in contemplation day and night, neither sleeping nor eating for seven days until his body was reduced to skin and bones. Yan Hui went again to enlighten him, after which Zigong returned to Confucius' school. From then on, he devoted himself to playing the qin and reciting classics, never abandoning these practices for the rest of his life.

This passage illustrates: Earlier, Yan Hui had sought Confucius' permission to visit the state of Wei. Confucius believed that if Yan Hui went, he might face punishment—perhaps because Yan Hui had not yet fully realized the state of "joyfully accepting Heaven's will and knowing one's destiny," thus still harboring anxieties. As for the description that Yan Hui "when employed, would act; when cast aside, would withdraw"—being identical to Confucius—this precisely shows he had attained genuine realization. Though Zigong possessed wisdom sufficient to comprehend the sage, he had not yet heard the sage's teachings on the Dao of Heaven, hence his initial disorientation. However, his ability to contemplate deeply for days without cease, even neglecting food and sleep until physically emaciated, demonstrates complete self-forgetfulness and merging with principle. Only then could he receive the sage's way. Thus when Yan Hui illuminated him, he immediately awakened and returned to his master's school, devoting his life to qin and books—finding joy in playing the qin while understanding that classics should never be lightly discarded.

Another account records: When a senior minister of Chen visited Lu, he privately met with the noble Shusun. Shusun remarked: "Our state has a sage—is it not Kong Qiu (Confucius)?" The Chen minister asked: "How do you know he is a sage?" Shusun replied: "I heard Yan Hui say that Kong Qiu can 'discard the mind and employ the body' (transcend rational thought to directly perceive with bodily awareness)." The Chen minister responded: "Our state also has a sage—did you not know?" Asked who it was, he answered: "Kangcangzi, a disciple of Lao Dan (Laozi), who received Laozi's true transmission. He can see with his ears and hear with his eyes." When Duke Lu heard this, he was astounded and sent a high-ranking minister with generous gifts to invite him. Kangcangzi accepted the summons, and Duke Lu humbly sought his teaching. Kangcangzi said: "The rumor is mistaken. I can perceive without using ears and eyes, but cannot exchange their functions." Duke Lu exclaimed: "This is even more marvelous! What principle underlies this? I must hear the full explanation."

(Supplementary note: "Discard the mind and employ the body" refers to transcending rational thought to perceive directly through bodily awareness. "Seeing with ears and hearing with eyes" describes extraordinary abilities that may emerge at advanced stages of Daoist cultivation, though Kangcangzi clarifies this doesn't literally mean swapping sensory functions, but rather attaining perception without relying on ordinary senses.)

 解曰人之見聞不離形體雖聖人亦無以異於人也特聖人  所以爲見聞寄於形體以發其明不盡循於形體 也唯其不  循形體故能廢心唯其寄於形體故猶用形廢心卽亢倉子  之視聽不用耳目用形卽亢倉子 之不能易耳目之用以亢  倉子之爲聖不殊於孔子之聖則知孔子之道無異於老君  之道也 亢倉子曰我體合於心心合於氣氣合於神神合於無  解曰太初有無無有無名而神運乎其中矣太初兆而爲氣  之始氣委和而有生有生斯有心造化之均付於 人者如此  所以有狂聖之異者以其所合不同也聖人則每陟愈上而  合於無合於無則無往而不合矣 眾人則每降愈下而合於  物合於物則無適而不礙矣體合於心則忘其形體心合於  氣則忘其思慮氣 合於神則渾然一氣聖而不可知矣然而  神雖妙猶未離有至於神合於無則同於太虛於大不終於  小 不遺萬物莫能逃其鑑矣 其有介然之有唯然之音雖遠在八荒之外近在眉睫 之內來 干我者我必知之乃不知是我七孔四支之所 覺心腹六藏之 所知其自知而已矣魯侯大悅他日以 告仲尼仲尼笑而不答
Interpretation

Human perception relies entirely on bodily organs, and in this regard, even sages are no different from ordinary people. What sets sages apart is their ability to perceive the world through the body without being confined by it. Precisely because they transcend physical limitations, they surpass ordinary mental faculties; yet precisely because they still employ the body, they retain its functional capacities. This state of transcending the mind resembles the Daoist figure Kangcangzi, whose seeing and hearing did not depend on eyes and ears, while his use of bodily functions remained as natural as Kangcangzi’s inability to alter the purpose of his senses. Since Kangcangzi as a sage was no different from Confucius, we can understand that Confucius’s Way (Dao) and Laozi’s Way are fundamentally the same.

Kangcangzi said: "My body unites with the heart-mind, the heart-mind unites with Qi (vital energy), Qi unites with the spirit (Shen), and the spirit unites with emptiness and nothingness." In the beginning of the universe, there was only pure emptiness—not even the concept of "nothingness" existed—yet within it, the mysterious workings of the divine were already in motion. When the Supreme Origin (Taichu) manifested as Qi, the interaction of Yin and Yang gave rise to life, and with life came consciousness. The Creator endowed all humans equally with this essence. The distinction between foolishness and sagehood lies in the degree to which each person aligns with these different states of being.

Sages continuously refine themselves until they merge with emptiness and nothingness. Reaching this state allows them to harmonize with all things effortlessly. Ordinary people, however, sink deeper into attachment, aligning only with concrete phenomena, and thus remain constrained in every way. When the body unites with the heart-mind, one forgets the existence of the physical form; when the heart-mind unites with Qi, one transcends thought; when Qi unites with the spirit, one becomes an unfathomable, mysterious state of profound unity. Yet even the spirit, though mysterious, still belongs to the realm of "being." Only when the spirit unites with emptiness and nothingness does one become as vast as the Supreme Void (Taixu), capable of encompassing all things without overlooking the smallest detail—everything in the world exists within its awareness.

No matter how minuscule an object or faint a sound, whether it comes from the farthest reaches of the eight directions or right before one’s eyes, if it touches my perception, I will know it. Yet this knowledge does not come through the senses of the seven apertures and four limbs, nor through the awareness of internal organs—it is simply spontaneous enlightenment. When the ruler of Lu heard this, he was greatly delighted and later recounted it to Confucius, who merely smiled in silence.

 解曰八荒之外至遠也山河布列萬物紛錯視聽之所不周  眉睫之內至近也腑臟居中竅穴居外知見不能 自見神合  於無則形體融虛物象銷殞渾然太虛雖麽蟲之微可視猶  嵩山之阿况於介然之有乎雖麽 蟲之聲可聽猶雷霆之響  况於唯然之音乎老君曰其出彌遠其知彌少義協於此雖  然聖人不務多知 也來干我者則知之爾唯其不務外知是  以莫覺莫知其知自然無所不知也如其所知得之於覺則   不離於體得之於知則不出乎思又焉能無不畢知哉亢倉  子之言盡之矣莫逆於心而不可以容聲矣是 以魯侯以告  仲尼仲尼笑而不答 商太宰見孔子曰邱聖者歟孔子曰聖則邱何敢然則 邱博學 多識者也商太宰曰三王聖者歟孔子曰三王 善任智勇者聖 則邱不知曰五帝聖者歟孔子曰五帝 善任仁義者聖則邱弗 知曰三皇聖者歟孔子曰三皇 善任因時者聖則邱弗知商太 宰大駭  解曰道一而已皇降而帝堯以是而傳之舜舜以是而傳之  禹湯文武皆古聖人也然而羲皇之簡朴堯舜之 遜湯武之
Interpretation

Beyond the heavens and earth lies the unfathomable distance where mountains and rivers scatter and myriad things intermingle - realms beyond human perception. Yet within the blink of an eye, in the most intimate proximity, our internal organs remain hidden behind bodily orifices, invisible to our own gaze. Only when the Shen (spirit) merges with the Dao of emptiness can the physical form dissolve into the void, where external phenomena naturally fade into oneness with the vast cosmos. In this state, even the tiniest insect appears as clearly as Mount Song, let alone manifest objects; the faintest chirp resonates like thunder, let alone distinct sounds.

Laozi's saying "The further one travels, the less one knows" expresses this truth. Yet the sage doesn't pursue extensive knowledge, only comprehending what comes to seek understanding. Precisely because they don't deliberately chase external knowledge, they appear unaware while naturally attaining omniscience. If knowledge comes from sensory perception, it remains bound by physical limitations; if from cognitive thinking, it cannot transcend conceptual frameworks - how could such approaches truly comprehend all? Master Kangcang (a Daoist figure) stated profoundly: The highest realization is when the heart understands beyond words. Thus when the Duke of Lu consulted Confucius, the sage merely smiled without answering.

The Grand Steward of Song asked Confucius: "Are you a sage?" Confucius replied: "I dare not claim sagehood - merely broad learning." The steward pressed: "Were Yu of Xia, Tang of Shang, and King Wen of Zhou sages?" Confucius said: "These three were virtuous rulers skilled in employing wisdom and courage - whether sages I cannot say." "Then were the Five Emperors sages?" "They were enlightened sovereigns adept at practicing benevolence and righteousness - whether sages remains unclear to me." "What about the Three Sovereigns?" "They were exemplary leaders skilled in adapting to their times - whether sages I still dare not affirm." The steward was astounded.

Here we must clarify: The great Dao is singular. Transmitted from the Three Sovereigns to the Five Emperors, Yao passed it to Shun, who passed it to Yu - all ancient sages including Tang of Shang and King Wen followed this same Dao. Yet Fuxi's era of simplicity, Yao and Shun's abdication traditions, and the revolutionary changes of Tang and King Wu each manifested unique characteristics, all being adaptations to their respective historical moments.

 爭孔子之素王皆其不得已因時而應世所以爲聖者隱矣  故孔子於商太宰之問在己則曰 不敢於人則曰不知雖然  善任因時則道顯善任仁義則德著善任智勇則業富博學  多識則窮理盡性 皆聖人之事也特不敢知而已且皇降而  帝帝降而王商太宰則王者之佐爾彼其於帝王之治方且  祖 述憲章之不暇遽而告以弗知爲帝爲皇之聖彼又烏能  無驚乎哉 曰然則孰者爲聖孔子動容有間曰西方之人有聖者 焉  解曰所謂聖人者卽皇之道帝之德王之業孔子之集大成  也孔子語商太宰者亦皆聖人之事也其所以不 居其聖者  蓋所以聖則與於神而不可知矣聖人作而兆於變化則爲  萬物之所覩而所以爲聖者隱矣 可知其治而不知其道矣  商太宰乃欲外聖人而求聖惑亦甚矣孔子動容將正容以  悟之也動容有間 而不悟是終不能知言之謂也於是乃告  之曰西方之人有聖者焉所謂西方之人者亦以聖人之不  離 於神天之本宗而未兆於變化者爲言爾蓋西爲復命反  性之方也且天道自西而之北至北而後爲復 命之至列子  語聖人之道每託言於西方者方祛衰周文勝之弊欲斯民  去華而就實故言主於西亦以 此言化人之所從來老聃之  所徂往也如至於北之辯則又將爲震之出矣此其言之旨  歟
Interpretation

Confucius was called the "Uncrowned King" (Suwang) precisely because he acted in accordance with the needs of his time, as true sages often conceal their spiritual attainments. When the Prime Minister of Shang asked whether Confucius could be considered a sage, Confucius first modestly declined the title, then claimed ignorance. In truth, the ability to harmonize with circumstances manifests the Dao, practicing benevolence and righteousness reveals De (Virtue/Power), applying wisdom and courage accomplishes great deeds, while vast learning exhausts the principles of things—all these are indeed the actions of a sage, though Confucius refused to claim such status for himself.

From the ancient "Huang" rulers (like the Three Sovereigns) to the later "Di" emperors (like the Five Emperors), down to the Zhou dynasty's "Kings," the Shang Prime Minister—whose duties involved assisting rulers in governance—could barely keep up with emulating imperial statecraft. Suddenly being told of sages who transcended even the imperial realm naturally shocked him.

After contemplation, Confucius remarked, "In the West there are sages." These sages embodied the Dao of Huang rulers, the De of Di emperors, and the achievements of Kings—a comprehensive perfection like Confucius himself. His refusal to claim sainthood stemmed from true sagely realms being incomprehensible to ordinary people, as they connect with divine intelligence. While sages manifest transformative teachings when responding to the world, their essential sagehood remains profoundly hidden.

The Prime Minister's attempt to recognize sagehood through superficial observation revealed his confusion. Confucius initially tried awakening him through solemn demeanor, but seeing his inability to comprehend, pointed westward. "West" symbolizes the direction of returning to one's original nature (associated with Metal in the Five Phases, representing contraction and return), just as the Dao's movement flows from west to north (Water phase, representing life's origin). The Liezi text frequently uses western imagery to discuss sagely principles, countering the Zhou dynasty's ritual extravagance by guiding people back to simplicity.

This reference to the West subtly alludes to Laozi's legendary westward journey through Hangu Pass. Pushing further northward leads to the eastern direction of germination (associated with the Zhen trigram). The passage's essence reveals how the sage's Dao transcends directional limitations—simultaneously imperceptible yet omnipresent.

不治而不亂不言而自信不化而自行蕩蕩乎民無能 名焉邱 疑其爲聖弗知眞爲聖歟眞不聖歟  解曰天下本無事彼民有常然不忍一世之傷而治之斯謷  萬世之患而莫之救矣是故應帝王者以道觀言 命物之化  所不免也然而有言則必有疑之者矣有化則亦有拂之者  矣名存於治亂則其去聖逾遠矣 唯蕩蕩乎民無能名者爲  足以擬聖也老君曰道常無名無始曰道不當名聖人者道  之至也可名則非 道矣由伏犧而至孔子其應世之跡不幾  於賣名聲於天下者乎宜孔子不知其聖也然而以無能名   爲聖旣可名以無名亦旣有矣安得爲無能名蓋終不可得  而名者道之眞名之以無能名而託其無者聖 人之不得已  故孔子雖曰西方之人有聖者焉終亦云弗知其眞爲聖而  眞不聖也雖然所謂無能名者 非以虛無無爲離於稱謂爲  無也故曰雖爲而無爲之之累若可名而無可名之實爾故  孔子嘗以蕩蕩 乎民無能名稱堯矣不廢其巍巍之成功也  觀孔子之語商太宰者始也不知其聖終亦疑其爲聖不知  其跡於其始莫知其妙於其終聖而不可知於是乎在 商太宰默然心計曰孔邱欺我哉  解曰有方而後可欺商太宰於孔子之言辯不足以屈其理  誠不足以信其道故心計之以爲我欺也
Interpretation

This passage discusses the Daoist political philosophy of "governing through non-action (Wuwei)" and the realm of sagehood. The core message conveys that truly enlightened governance maintains order without deliberate intervention, earns trust without words, and allows people to naturally transform without forced indoctrination. Such governance operates as effortlessly as the movement of heaven and earth—so seamless that the common people cannot even find words to praise it.

The author observes that the world is inherently peaceful, with people existing in their natural state. When rulers impose governance out of "compassion for people's suffering," they inadvertently sow seeds of future calamity. True sage-kings perceive affairs through the lens of the Dao (the Way), harmonizing with the spontaneous transformations of all things. Forced moral education breeds resistance, while excessive pursuit of a "well-governed world" only distances one from the Dao of sagehood.

Laozi (Laojun) stated: The true Dao cannot be named. From Fuxi to Confucius, the worldly deeds of these sages—were they not essentially seeking fame in the realm of men? Thus Confucius himself admitted he could not determine whether the sage of the Western Zhou truly qualified as a sage. The authentic Dao of sages defies definition; it can only be described as "nameless"—a term sages reluctantly use for lack of alternatives.

The text references Confucius using "the people's inability to praise" to describe Emperor Yao's achievements, yet this does not negate Yao's greatness. When Confucius debated the nature of sagehood with the Grand Steward of Shang, the official failed to comprehend and ultimately accused Confucius of deception. The commentator notes that deception requires specific methods, whereas Confucius was merely expounding principles—the Grand Steward's misunderstanding stemmed from his inability to grasp the profound meaning.

This passage emphasizes that true sage-governance follows nature's course without leaving traces. Its brilliance lies precisely in being imperceptible to the people—so sublime it transcends verbal description. This realm surpasses worldly notions of "wisdom" and "reputation," representing the highest ideal of governance in Daoist philosophy.

子夏問孔子曰顏囘之爲人奚若子曰囘之仁賢於邱 也曰子 貢之爲人奚若子曰賜之辯賢於邱也曰子路 之爲人奚若子 曰由之勇賢於邱也曰子張之爲人奚 若子曰師之莊賢於邱 也子夏避席而問曰然則四子 者何爲事夫子曰居吾語女夫 囘能仁而不能反賜能 辯而不能訥由能勇而不能怯師能莊 而不能同兼四 子之有以易吾吾弗許也此其所以事吾而不 貳也  解曰諸子之德譬猶陰陽聖人之道譬猶沖氣沖氣微於陰  陽陰陽資於沖氣語四子之有皆賢於夫子兼四 子之有則  不許其易夫子然則其賢也乃其所以爲偏其不及也乃其  所以爲妙此四子所以事夫子而 不貳也 子列子旣師壺邱子林友伯昏瞀人乃居南郭從之處 者曰數 而不及  解曰列子旣進二子之道乘風而歸則所以處己者至矣盡  矣列子不忍以夫子之道獨善其身也於是乃居 南郭也南  明方郭邑中也旣已出而趨物之會則不能使人無保汝而  戶外之屨滿矣 雖然子列子亦微焉朝朝相與辯無不聞而與南郭子 連牆二 十年不相謁請相遇於道目若不相見者門之 徒役以爲子列 子與南郭子有敵不疑  解曰謂之南郭子則體道之妙居塵而不染者是所以與子  列子爲連牆也二子之道圓通妙合常相與以不
Interpretation

Zixia asked Confucius: "What kind of person is Yan Hui?" Confucius replied: "Yan Hui's benevolence (De) surpasses mine." Zixia then asked: "What about Zigong?" Confucius said: "Zigong's eloquence surpasses mine." When asked about Zilu, Confucius responded: "Zilu's courage surpasses mine." Finally inquiring about Zizhang, Confucius answered: "Zizhang's dignity surpasses mine." Zixia rose and pressed further: "Then why do these four still follow you as their teacher?" Confucius invited him to sit and explained: "Yan Hui, though benevolent, lacks adaptability; Zigong, while eloquent, cannot remain silent; Zilu, despite his bravery, doesn't know when to yield; Zizhang, dignified as he is, fails to be accommodating. If I were to exchange my Dao for their individual strengths, I would refuse. This is precisely why they follow me."

This interpretation reveals that the four disciples' virtues resemble the dual forces of Yin-Yang, while Confucius' sagely Dao functions like the harmonizing Qi that balances these opposites (in Daoist thought, the primordial Qi is the source of all things). This harmonizing Qi may appear weaker than the distinct Yin-Yang forces, yet it is essential for their equilibrium. Though each disciple excels in particular qualities, Confucius' refusal to exchange demonstrates that their strengths simultaneously constitute limitations, whereas his apparent "deficiencies" embody profound subtlety.

Liezi (a prominent Daoist figure) studied under Master Huqiuzi Lin and befriended Bohun Maoren. Later, he moved to dwell in the southern district of the city, where his followers became too numerous to count. The commentary explains that Liezi, having already mastered the true teachings of these two sages, could have lived in reclusive perfection, yet chose to reside in bustling urban surroundings. The southern district symbolizes the realm of illumination, but engaging with worldly affairs inevitably invites disturbances—his doorway was often crowded with visitors' shoes.

Nevertheless, Liezi maintained his humility. For twenty years he lived as neighbor to Nanguozi (an enlightened master), hearing their daily morning discourses on the Dao, yet never exchanging visits. When meeting on the road, they would pass as strangers, leading disciples to suspect enmity between them. The commentary suggests Nanguozi embodied the ideal of dwelling in worldly dust yet remaining unstained—though separated from Liezi by mere walls, their spirits communicated through this "non-interaction," achieving a higher harmony beyond conventional social bonds.

來而來不  見而見又奚以相謁請爲哉非特不相謁請也雖相遇於道  目若不相見者夫學道者至於目 擊而道存亦已至矣然待  於目擊猶未離見唯相遇而目若不相見則離於知見無相  無作彼我都忘列 子之道盡於是矣故曰子列子亦微焉微  以言不離於道心之小而妙也然則朝朝相與辯無不聞豈  好 辯哉以夫從之處者故不得已爾門之徒役方且見列子  於言辯之間故以其不相謁請爲有敵而不疑 也 有自楚來者問子列子曰先生與南郭子奚敵子列子 曰南郭 子貌充心虛耳無聞目無見口無言心無知形 無惕往將奚爲  解曰貌充者修身而形不衰也心虛者忘心而物不留也耳  無聞者自聞而已目無見者自見而已口無言出 言不言也  心無知眞知無知也形無惕都無所畏忌也若是者師資兼  忘其往也將奚爲哉 雖然試與汝偕往閱弟子四十人同行  解曰列子旣已言南郭子之妙矣恐其徒役之重惑於至道  故與之偕往閱而實之以見也弟子四十人同行 猶所謂與  人偕來之眾也 見南郭子果若欺魄焉而不可與接顧視子列子形神 不相偶 而不可與羣  解曰神生形形成神形神偶合人之所以有生也形神不相  偶所謂有人之形無人之情也是欺魄之類也欺 魄土偶人  也若是者遺物離人而立於獨故不可與接不可與羣
Interpretation

This passage recounts the story between Liezi (a prominent Daoist figure) and Master Nanguo, illustrating the supreme Daoist state of "forgetting both form and spirit."

A man from Chu asked Liezi: "Does the master have some grievance with Master Nanguo?" Liezi replied: "Master Nanguo's outer form remains full while his inner mind stays empty. His ears hear no external sounds, his eyes see no external sights, his mouth speaks no words, his mind holds no attachments, and his body knows no fear. What could one possibly accomplish by seeking out such a man?"

Explanation: The "full outer form" refers to cultivating the body through self-refinement so it doesn't decay; "empty inner mind" means forgetting mental activity and remaining untethered by external things. "Hearing no sounds" means listening only to inner resonance; "seeing no sights" means gazing only at inner visions; "speaking no words" means words become as unspoken; "mind without knowledge" signifies true wisdom that transcends ordinary knowing; "body without fear" indicates complete fearlessness. One who attains this state forgets even the distinction between teacher and disciple—what purpose would visiting serve?

Yet despite this explanation, Liezi took forty disciples to visit Master Nanguo. This was because he feared his disciples might become confused about the highest Daoist principles, so he personally led them to witness this example. The forty disciples accompanying him symbolized numerous followers.

When they met Master Nanguo, he indeed appeared like a clay or wooden statue with whom communication proved impossible. Observing Liezi, his physical form and spirit also seemed separated, unable to blend with the group. The commentary explains: Spirit gives rise to form, and form completes spirit—only when united do they constitute life. When form and spirit separate, it's like having human shape without human emotions, akin to sculpted idols. Such individuals transcend external things, withdraw from human company, and commune solely with the celestial and earthly spirits—hence they cannot communicate or integrate with others.

Through contrasting these two figures, the passage reveals the ultimate realm of Daoist cultivation: transcending sensory perception to achieve the state of "no-form and no-action" where both form-spirit and self-other distinctions dissolve. While Liezi appears engaged in debate, this is merely expedient means—his true attainment lies beyond verbal contention.

南郭子俄而指子列子之弟子末行者與言衎衎然若 專直而 在雄者子列子之徒駭之反舍咸有疑色  解曰夫乾其靜也專其動也直衎衎言其和也衎衎然若專  直而在雄者則言若體乾之道尸萬物之化而納 之太和者  俄而指弟子之末行者與言則遇感而應非有心也其道大  故駭之信不足有不信故反舍咸 有疑色與退而省其私亦  足以發者異矣 子列子曰得意者無言進知者亦無言用無言爲言亦 言無知 爲知亦知無言與不言無知與不知亦言亦知 亦無所不言亦 無所不知亦無所言亦無所知如斯而 已汝奚妄駭哉  解曰書不盡言言不盡意故得意者無言知者不言言者不  知故進知者亦無言然而以無言無知爲當是絶 物也以不  言不知爲是則未能忘我也以有言有知爲是則其所得亦  淺矣言乎言終日言而未 嘗言不言乎不言終日不言而未  嘗不言無所不言無所不知亦無所言亦無所知二子之相
Interpretation

Master Nan Guo suddenly pointed to the disciple at the rear of Liezi's procession and engaged him in cheerful conversation, his demeanor harmoniously natural—appearing both focused and upright yet carrying an air of dignity. Liezi's other disciples were astonished, and upon returning to their quarters, all wore expressions of bewilderment.

Explanation: The Qian hexagram (one of the Eight Trigrams/Bagua) embodies singular focus in stillness and unwavering integrity in movement. The term "kan kan" describes a state of harmonious ease. Master Nan Guo manifested this quality of focused integrity with dignified presence, as if embodying the principles of the Qian hexagram—governing the transformations of all things while abiding in the Great Harmony (cosmic equilibrium). His sudden engagement with the last-ranked disciple arose from spontaneous resonance rather than deliberate intent, representing a profoundly advanced spiritual state.

The disciples' astonishment stemmed from their insufficient cultivation to comprehend such depth. This differs from the Confucian Analects' scenario of "retiring to examine one's private conduct."

Liezi said: Those who truly comprehend the Dao (the Way) need no words; those who deepen wisdom don't rely on speech. Using "wordlessness" as expression is itself a form of speech; employing "non-knowing" as cognition is itself a mode of wisdom. Whether speaking or silent, knowing or unknowing—all are valid means of expression and understanding. One should be capable of both exhaustive expression and perfect silence, of complete knowing and absolute unknowing. Such is the truth—why should this startle you?

Explanation: Written characters cannot fully capture speech, nor can speech completely convey meaning. Thus genuine Dao-comprehenders transcend verbal expression, and truly wise ones move beyond intellectual knowing. To stubbornly insist that "wordless non-knowing" is correct creates separation from reality; to believe "not-speaking not-knowing" represents truth still clings to self; while considering "speech and knowing" as valid only yields superficial attainment. What we call speaking—though talking all day, one may never truly speak; what we call silence—though silent all day, one may never cease communicating. Only when capable of both exhaustive expression and perfect silence, complete knowing and absolute unknowing, does one reach the realm of mutual understanding shared by Master Nan Guo and Liezi.

 遇如斯而已是乃道之常非有異也又奚以妄駭爲哉列子  凡言如斯而已與老君所謂吾何以知天下之然哉以此同  意學者由斯足以悟至道矣外此而二則非眞矣由是知列  子之訓亦昭昭矣 子列子學也三年之後心不敢念是非口不敢言利害 始得老 商一眄而已五年之後心更念是非口更言利 害老商始一解 顔而笑七年之後從心之所念更無是 非從口之所言更無利 害夫子始一引吾並席而坐九 年之後橫心之所念橫口之所 言亦不知我之是非利 害歟亦不知彼之是非利害歟外內進 矣而後眼如耳 耳如鼻鼻如口口無不同心凝形釋骨肉都融 不覺形 之所倚足之所履心之所念言之所藏如斯而已則理 無所隱矣  解曰狂 聖 異 域究觀差殊止存毫忽心欲凝也而放之形欲  釋也而結之心馳而不反形融而不通心爲形之所使形爲  心之所役雖一身之中眼不知耳耳不知鼻鼻不知口肝膽  有楚越之異而况於萬物之理乎不覺形之所倚足之所履  以其形釋也不知心之所念言之所藏以其心凝也如是則  耳目鼻口互相發明骨肉都融而合於神之至無來干我者  我必知之理無所隱者以此列子嘗以是言其御風而行矣  復以此言理無所隱者御風在我燭理在物其用
Interpretation

Liezi (a prominent Daoist figure) studied under his teacher Lao Shang, progressing through several stages of cultivation. In the first three years, he dared not distinguish right from wrong in his heart nor speak of gain and loss with his mouth—only then did Lao Shang glance at him briefly. After five years, he began making mental distinctions about right and wrong and discussing matters of benefit and harm, at which point Lao Shang finally smiled at him.

By the seventh year, he no longer clung to judgments of right and wrong in his heart, nor did his words dwell on gain and loss—only then did his teacher allow him to sit at the same mat.

In the ninth year, his thoughts and speech reached a state of complete freedom: he neither distinguished his own right and wrong nor concerned himself with others'. At this stage, his inner and outer being became fully unified, and the boundaries between his senses dissolved—his eyes could hear like ears, his ears could smell like a nose, his nose could speak like a mouth, and all his senses intermingled without obstruction. His spirit (Shen) concentrated, his physical form melted away, and he no longer felt what his body leaned upon or where his feet stood. Thought and speech became indistinguishable. In this state, the principles of heaven and earth were fully revealed to him.

In the cultivation process, wild abandon and sage-like wisdom may seem worlds apart, yet the difference lies in a single thought. If the spirit scatters and the body remains constrained, the senses become fragmented (for instance, the eyes failing to understand the ears’ function)—just as the liver and gallbladder, though physically close, might seem as distant as the states of Chu and Yue. Only when the body fully relaxes and the spirit completely gathers can the senses interpenetrate, flesh and bones dissolve, and unity with the supreme Dao (the Way) be achieved. External things then cannot disturb, and truth manifests naturally. Liezi’s legendary ability to ride the wind arose from this state of "no hidden principles"—commanding the winds and comprehending truth may appear different, but both are expressions of oneness with the Dao.

雖不同苟

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0121); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →