中文 · EN

《沖虛至德真經四解》Vol. 14

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 14 / 20 5,725 characters

About this page. The original text of 《沖虛至德真經四解》 Vol. 14 (Dongshen 洞神部, 20 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 12 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《沖虛至德真經四解》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

沖虛至德眞經四解卷之十四德三    湯間 周穆王西巡狩越崑崙不至弇山反 還未及中國道有獻工人名偃師  中道有國獻此工巧之人也 穆王薦之(薦當/作進)問曰若有何能偃師曰臣唯 命所試然臣己有所造願王先觀之穆王曰 日以俱來(日謂/別日)吾與若俱觀之  盧曰神用之妙豈唯聲哉色香滋味咸及  其理矣故此章言刻象之盡微 越日偃師謁見王王薦之曰若與偕來者何 人邪對曰臣之所造能倡者(倡俳/優也)穆王驚視 之趣步俯仰信人也巧夫頷其頤則歌合律 捧其手則舞應節千變萬化惟意所適王以 爲實人也與盛姬内御並觀之  穆天子傳云盛姬穆王之美人 技將終倡者瞬其目而招王之左右侍妾王 大怒立欲誅偃師偃師大懾立剖散倡者以 示王皆傅會革木膠漆白黑丹青之所爲王 諦料之内則肝膽心肺脾腎腸胃外則筋骨 支節皮毛齒髪皆假物也而無不畢具者合 會復如初見  如向者之始見王也 王試廢其心則口不能言廢其肝則目不能 視廢其腎則足不能步  此皆以機關相使去其機關之主則不能  相制御亦如人之五藏有病皆外應七孔  與四支也  盧曰夫内肝瞻心肺所以能外爲視聽行  步神識運之乃爲生物耳苟無神則不能
Interpretation

During King Mu of Zhou's westward expedition, he crossed the Kunlun Mountains but turned back before reaching Mount Yan. On his return journey to the Central Plains, a tributary state presented a master craftsman named Yanshi. Summoning him, the king asked, "What skills do you possess?" Yanshi replied, "Your Majesty may test me as you wish. I have already created something—please observe it first." The king said, "Bring it another day, and we shall examine it together."

(Lu Zhongxuan's commentary: Divine craftsmanship manifests not only in sound but also in sensory experiences like color, fragrance, and taste. This chapter illustrates the pinnacle of sculptural artistry.)

The next day, Yanshi presented his creation. The king asked, "Who is this accompanying you?" Yanshi answered, "This is an artificial performer I crafted (a 'chang' refers to a singing and dancing entertainer)." To the king's astonishment, the figure walked and bowed exactly like a real person. Moving its chin made it sing in perfect rhythm, raising its hands prompted it to dance in time, with endless variations at will. The king initially mistook it for a living being and even summoned his favorite consort Shengji (the beauty recorded in The Travels of King Mu) and palace maidens to watch.

Near the performance's conclusion, the artificial figure shockingly winked at the king's concubines. Enraged, the king ordered Yanshi executed. In terror, Yanshi immediately dismantled the figure—revealing it was assembled from leather, wood, glue, lacquer, and pigments. Upon close inspection, the king found internally crafted organs and externally simulated sinews, bones, and hair—all meticulously replicated yet fully functional. When reassembled, it restored its lifelike movements.

The king conducted experiments: removing the "heart" rendered the figure speechless; extracting the "liver" made its eyes blind; taking out the "kidneys" left its legs immobile. (Lu Zhongxuan explains: This resembles how mechanisms fail when their central gear is removed, just as human organs affect limbs when diseased. The internal liver, heart, and lungs sustain external sight, hearing, and movement—all governed by the Shen (spirit). Without this spiritual command, functionality ceases.)

 用其五根矣今造化之生物亦何異於偃  師之所造耶若使無神自同於草木神苟  在也動用何足奇耶木人用偃師之神故  冝類彼生物也神工造極化何遠哉 穆王始悦而歎曰人之巧乃可與造化者同  功乎詔貳車載之以歸  近世人有言人靈因機關而生者何者造  化之功至妙故萬品咸育運動無方人藝  麤拙但寫載成形塊然而已至於巧極則  幾乎造化似或依此言而生此說而此書  貺自不爾所以明此義者宜以巧極思之  無方不可以常理限故每舉物極以祛近  惑豈謂物無神主耶斯失之遠矣 夫班輸之雲梯墨翟之飛鳶自謂能之極也  班輸作雲梯可以凌虚仰攻墨作木鳶  飛三日不集 弟子東門賈禽滑釐聞偃師之巧以告二子 二子終身不敢語藝而時執規矩  時執規矩言其不敢數之也  盧曰夫偃師之精微神合造物班輸之輩  但巧盡機關以明至妙之功不可獨循規  矩也  政和假於異物託於同體寓百骸象耳目  視聽言貌趣歩俯仰若性之自爲而不知  爲之者則其巧妙其功深獨成其天有人  之形豈特幾乎以其眞哉偃師之造信乎  與造化同功者矣雖然生者假借也道與  之貌天與之形亦奚以異於此  范曰崑崙者安靜之丘弇山者日入之所  越崑崙而不至弇山則雖欲戾動而之靜
Interpretation

This passage recounts the story of the ancient master craftsman Yanshi creating mechanical puppets, along with reflections on human ingenuity "rivaling nature's craftsmanship."

When King Mu of Zhou witnessed Yanshi's wooden automaton moving like a real person, he exclaimed in amazement: "Human skill can actually equal the Creator's work!" He then brought Yanshi to his palace in a secondary carriage. The text mentions that some modern thinkers mistakenly attribute human spirituality to mechanical constructions. The Creator's formative power is exquisitely subtle, capable of generating all things, while human craftsmanship remains crude, merely imitating external forms. Even at its pinnacle, human skill only approaches—never equals—the work of creation.

Examples are given: Lu Ban (Ban Shu) created cloud ladders capable of besieging cities, while Mozi (Mo Di) crafted wooden birds that could fly for three days without landing. Yet when their disciples heard of Yanshi's skill, they dared no longer boast of their craftsmanship for the rest of their lives, humbly adhering to established methods instead. This demonstrates Yanshi's art had reached the sublime level of resonating with the Creator's work, while Lu Ban and others merely mastered mechanical techniques.

The author elaborates further: The true wonder of creation lies in integrating diverse components into an organic whole—seeing, hearing, speaking, walking, and bowing like a living being, as if these actions were innate, with no visible operator. This realm constitutes genuine "skill rivaling nature." Yanshi's creation indeed attained parity with the Creator's work.

Finally, the text employs symbolic mountains: Kunlun (representing stillness) and Yan Mountain (where the sun sets). If one reaches Kunlun without attaining Yan Mountain, though desiring to return from motion to stillness, one cannot truly arrive. This metaphor suggests that pursuing technical skill alone without comprehending the underlying Dao ultimately fails to grasp creation's true essence.

 未能去明而即幽故反遣而已偃師之倡  功同造化頷其頤則歌合律若天籟之自  嗚棒其乎則舞應節若天機之自動千變  萬化惟意所適穆王驚而視之信以爲實  人也曾不知其傅會革木膠漆白黑丹青  之所爲而已彼進乎技者然耳又況體道  之人通乎物之所造者宜如何哉 甘蠅古之善射者彀弓而獸伏鳥下  箭無虛發而鳥獸不敢逸戰國策云更羸  虚發而鳥下也 弟子名飛衛學射於甘蠅而巧過其師紀昌 者又學射於飛衛飛衛曰爾先學不瞬而後 可言射矣紀昌歸偃卧妻之機下以目承牽 挺(牽挺/機躡)二年之後雖錐末倒眥而不瞬也以 告飛衛飛衛曰未也  盧曰夫虚弓下鳥者藝之妙也巧過其師  者通於神也妙在所習神在精微也先學  不瞬精之至也以目承躡而不動者神定  之矣定而未能用故曰猶未也 必學視而後可  盧曰此用不瞬以爲視也 視小如大視微如著而後告我  盧曰視審也則見小如大矣 昌以氂懸虱於牖南面而望之旬日之間浸 大也三年之後如車輪焉以睹餘物皆丘山 也  視虱如輪則餘物稱此而大焉 乃以燕角之弧朔蓬之簳射之貫虱之心而 懸不絶  以彊弓勁矢貫虱之心言其用手之妙也 以告飛衛飛衛高蹈拊膺曰汝得之矣  盧曰視小如大貫之不足爲難
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the essence of Daoist cultivation and skill mastery through two parables.

The first story recounts how King Mu of Zhou encountered a lifelike wooden puppet crafted by an artisan named Yanshi. The puppet could sing, dance, and move with such natural grace that the king mistook it for a living being. In truth, it was merely an ingenious assembly of leather, wood, lacquer, and pigments. The text uses this to illustrate that while such craftsmanship is already extraordinary, how much more profound must be the attainment of those who truly comprehend the Dao (the Way) and grasp the fundamental nature of all things?

The second story revolves around the legendary archer Gan Ying and his disciples, Fei Wei and Ji Chang. Gan Ying never missed a shot—birds and beasts would fall the moment his arrow flew. Fei Wei studied under Gan Ying and eventually surpassed his master. Later, Ji Chang sought to learn from Fei Wei, who instructed him first to master the art of not blinking before advancing to archery. Ji Chang practiced by lying beneath a loom, staring fixedly at the treadle. After two years, he could remain unflinching even if an awl’s tip grazed his eyelid. Yet Fei Wei declared this insufficient—he next had to refine his vision.

Ji Chang then tied a louse to a window with a yak’s hair and gazed at it daily. After three years, the louse appeared as large as a cartwheel, while other objects loomed like mountains. At this stage, he shot the louse with a bow made of Yan’s ox horn and an arrow of northern reeds, piercing its heart without snapping the suspending hair. When Fei Wei heard of this, he leaped for joy, slapping his chest and exclaiming, “You’ve finally grasped the essence!”

The passage teaches that mastery—whether in skill or Daoist cultivation—begins with foundational training, progressing step by step. It demands unwavering focus and persistence to reach the realm of subtlety. Just as Ji Chang first mastered stillness, then vision, and only then achieved unerring precision, so too must cultivation be pursued with unrelenting dedication to attain the state of understanding all things and acting with effortless spontaneity.

紀昌旣盡衛之術計天下之敵己者一人而 已乃謀殺飛衛  盧曰欲摧其能擬過其師法耳欲滅飛衛  之名非謂斷其命也矣 相遇於野二人交射中路矢鋒相觸而墜於 地而塵不揚飛衛之矢先窮(窮盡/者也)紀昌遺一 矢旣發飛衛以棘刺之端扞之而無差焉  盧曰二矢同道相及而勢盡故墜地而塵  不飛者微之甚也以棘刺扞之不差審之  至也 於是二子泣而投弓相拜於塗請爲父子剋 臂以誓不得告術於人  祕其道也此一章義例已詳於仲尼篇也  盧曰此所謂神交而意得也非矢之藝故  投弓而誓焉神契方傳矣故不得以術告  之也  政和内有所定然後在外者能有所應微  有所審然後於其著者能無所遺伯昏瞀  人謂列子曰汝怵然有恂目之志於中也  殆矣夫蓋謂其内不能有所定也紀昌先  學不瞬而以目承牽挺者以此莊子曰自  大視細者不明蓋謂其微不能有所審也  昌以氂毛垂虱而望之浸大者以此蓋不  通乎此而善射者寡矣  范曰夫射於百歩之外其至爾之力也其  中非爾力也故教人射者必志於彀而學  之者亦必志於彀豈非力分之内可學而  能力分之外不可勉而至故耶飛衛學射  於甘蠅而術過其師固有得於自然之天  性者夫人之身居於内則心爲之主接於
Interpretation

Ji Chang, having mastered the archery skills of Fei Wei (an ancient legendary archer), believed only his teacher remained as a potential rival in the world. He thus sought to eliminate Fei Wei—not literally to kill, but to surpass his master's reputation.

When the two met in the wilderness for an archery duel, their arrows collided midair and fell without even stirring dust. Fei Wei exhausted his arrows first, and when Ji Chang had one remaining, Fei Wei deftly intercepted it with a thorn tip. This scene illustrates their archery had reached the realm of perfection—where skill in the Dao of archery cancels out opposing force, and deflecting an arrow with a thorn embodies the pinnacle of refinement.

Finally, they cast aside their bows, wept, and swore a father-son bond on the road, sealing their oath with a blood pact never to pass on their skills. This spiritual transmission surpassed mere technique, echoing what Bohun Wuren (a Daoist sage) once told Liezi: "If the mind is unsettled, external performance falters." When Ji Chang first trained in archery, he practiced not blinking until he could stare at a louse tied to a horsehair until it appeared as large as a chariot wheel—a reversal of Zhuangzi's teaching that "viewing the minute from the grand obscures clarity."

Fan Yingyuan (a Song Dynasty Daoist) remarked: The strength to pierce willow leaves at a hundred paces can be cultivated, but true accuracy lies beyond human effort. Just as teaching archery must emphasize drawing the bow to its full extent (彀), learners should aim for that fullness—because while technique can be mastered, realms beyond human capacity cannot be forced. Fei Wei surpassed his own teacher Gan Ying precisely by following natural aptitude. Within the body, the heart-mind reigns supreme; externally, the ears and eyes perceive. Only when inner and outer harmonize can skill reach its zenith.

 物則目爲之先故神舍於心而其機常寓  於目紀昌學射於飛衛必告之先學不瞬  者蓋欲其神全於内然後忤物而不慴故  也然不瞬而已猶非其至古之養勇亦有  所謂不目逃者若夫視小如大視微如著  棲睫之蟲見若嵩山則又庶夫徐以神視  者矣故能彀燕孤貫懸虱而不射之射得  之在我焉迨其乆旣盡穿楊之巧乃彎射  羿之弓抑何虚矯恃氣而以爭術尚勝爲  心耶故始而相遇於野則交射而矢鋒相  觸已而相拜於塗則投弓而剋臂以誓夫  學射之賤猶且不得告術於人又況夫體  道在己而進於不傳之妙者耶 造父之師曰泰豆氏  泰豆氏見諸雜書記 造父之始從習御也執禮甚卑泰豆三年不 告造父執禮愈謹乃告之曰古詩言良弓之 子必先爲箕良冶之子必先爲裘  箕裘者皆須柔屈補接而後成器爲弓冶  者調筋角和金鐵亦然故學者必先攻其  所易然後能成其所難所以爲諭也  慮曰箕者所以造弓之具也裘者所以扇  冶之具也老子以爲橐籥今之鞴袋也彼  以約弓之牀此以扇火之鞴非弓冶而弓  冶必資之也 汝先觀吾趣(趣行/也)趣如吾然後六轡可持六 馬可御造父曰唯命所從泰豆乃立木爲塗 僅可容足旣得安脚計步而置  䟽槩如其步數 履之而行趣走往還無跌失也造父學之三
Interpretation

This scripture conveys the essentials of mastering skills through two parables. The first recounts Ji Chang learning archery from Fei Wei. Fei Wei instructed Ji Chang that the first step was to train his eyes not to blink, for the spirit (Shen, inner consciousness) resides in the heart, and its movements are often revealed through the eyes. Only when one achieves complete mental focus can external disturbances cause no fear. Yet merely avoiding blinking is insufficient—ancient courage cultivation demanded the higher state of "not shying away from another's gaze." True masters perceive minute objects as clearly as mountains; a tiny insect resting on their eyelashes appears as massive as Mount Song. This level of spiritual observation enables miraculous feats like shooting down flying swallows or piercing a suspended louse.

The second story tells of Zao Fu learning charioteering from Tai Dou. Initially, Zao Fu approached with great humility, yet Tai Dou taught him nothing for three years. Only when Zao Fu's reverence deepened did Tai Dou enlighten him with an ancient proverb: "The son of a master bow-maker first learns to weave baskets; the son of a master smith first learns to stitch leather." For bending bamboo to make baskets and joining hides to sew garments share fundamental principles with crafting bows and forging metal. Tai Dou had Zao Fu practice walking on narrow stakes barely wide enough for his feet until he could dash back and forth without falling—only then did he teach true chariot-driving.

Both stories illustrate that profound skills must be built from foundational steps, progressing methodically. Like Laozi's analogy of the bellows (tuoyue)—a seemingly simple tool essential to smelting—true mastery lies not in superficial technique but in comprehending the fundamental Dao. The transmission of genuine artistry depends on awakening to this root principle rather than mere outward instruction.

日盡其巧泰豆歎曰子何其敏也得之捷乎  敏疾也捷速也 凡所御者亦如此也  盧曰立木如足布之如步莊子云側足之  外皆去其土則不能履之者必不定也若  御馬者亦如使其足則妙矣 曩汝之行得之於足應之於心推於御也齊 輯乎轡銜之際而急緩乎脣吻之和正度乎 胸臆之中而執節乎掌握之間内得於中心 而外合於馬志是故能進退履繩而旋曲中 規矩取道致遠而氣力有餘誠得其術也得 之於銜應之於轡得之於轡應之於手得之 於手應之於心則不以目視不以策驅心閑 體正六轡不亂而二十四蹄所投無差廻旋 進退莫不中節  與和鸞之聲相應也 然後輿輪之外可使無餘轍馬蹄之外可使 無餘地未嘗覺山谷之險原隰之夷視之一 也吾術窮矣汝其識之  夫行己之所踐容足而已足外無餘而人  不敢踐者此心不夷體不閑故也心夷體  閑即進止有常數遲疾有常度苟盡其妙  非但施之於身乃可行之於物雖六轡之  煩馬足之衆調之有道不患其亂故輪外  不恃無用之轍蹄外不賴無用之地可不  謂然也  盧曰莊生解牛云其骨也有間其刀刃也  無厚無厚入有間恢恢然有餘地也言其  理則多暇也不視足外之地則其志專志  專利運足如其心矣若移之於轡銜易之
Interpretation

Taizhou (an ancient master charioteer), observing his disciple's rapid progress in chariot-driving, exclaimed: "How swiftly you've learned! Your mastery comes with such speed!" Here, "swift" refers to agility, and "speed" to quickness. Indeed, all arts of charioteering follow this principle.

Lu Zhongxuan (commentator) explains: It's like walking on wooden stakes—distributing your steps as if the stakes were extensions of your feet. As Zhuangzi said, if you dig away all the earth beyond where your feet touch, a person cannot stand firm. The same applies to handling horses—only when the horse's hooves move as nimbly as your own feet can you claim true skill.

Previously when walking, your foot movements instantly registered in your mind. Now when driving, the tension of reins and bits should become as natural as breathing, with rhythm governed by your heart and movements controlled through your palms. When the mind is tranquil, external actions harmonize with the horse's will—then the chariot's advance and retreat become precise as treading a taut rope, and turns conform perfectly to measure. Even long journeys require no exertion—this is true mastery of charioteering.

The essence lies in this: the sensation from the bit transmits to the reins, from reins to hands, from hands to heart. Then you need neither fix your eyes nor wield the whip. With mind serene and posture upright, the six reins remain perfectly ordered, all twenty-four hooves (of six horses) strike with flawless coordination—every turn, advance or retreat executed impeccably, even the chariot bells resonating in harmony.

Having attained this state, your wheels leave no extraneous tracks beyond their path, your horses' hooves occupy no superfluous ground. Whether traversing perilous gorges or open plains, all appears equally effortless. My art is now fully transmitted to you.

When walking, what a person truly uses is merely the space beneath their feet. The unused ground beside one's feet seems daunting because of mental tension and physical stiffness. But with mind peaceful and body coordinated, advances and retreats follow natural rhythm, speed and slowness find proper measure. This subtle principle applies not only to oneself but extends to handling horses. Even with multiple reins and numerous hooves, proper regulation prevents disorder. Thus wheels need no reliance on extra ruts, nor hooves on surplus ground—is this not the very truth?

Lu Zhongxuan further cites Zhuangzi's butcher Ding carving oxen: "Between the ox's joints are spaces, and the blade's edge has no thickness—thus there's ample room to maneuver." This illustrates how understanding principles brings ease. By not fixating on unused ground beyond one's feet, the mind stays focused. With focused mind, footsteps follow the heart's intent effortlessly. Apply this same wisdom to reins and bits—the principle remains identical.

 於駔駿當轍應足何所傾危世人皆求其  末而不知其本識眞之士必求其本然後  用之故射御之末藝猶須合道焉  政和中無主而不止外無正而不行此性  習相成之道也故致道者必始之以習及  其得道也乃能成之於性良弓之子必學  爲箕良冶之子必先爲裘所以喻習也立  木爲塗僅可容足計歩而置履之而行所  以使之習也蓋立木爲塗僅可容足推之  於御故輿輪之外可使無餘轍馬蹄之外  可使無餘地計歩而置履之而行推之於  御故山谷之險原隰之夷可使視之如一  齊輯乎轡銜之際而急緩乎脣吻之和所  謂外合於馬志者也正度乎胸臆之中而  執節乎掌握之間所謂内得於中心者也  進退履繩而旋曲中規矩言其服御如此  取道致遠而氣力有餘言其順適如此轡  係銜者也故得之於手應之於轡手執轡  者也故得之於轡應之於手心運手者也  故得之於手應之於心至於不以目視不  以策驅而迴旋進退莫不中節則若性之  自然而不知爲之者此之謂善御  范曰紀昌學射於飛衛飛衛不教之以射  而教之以先學不瞬造父學御於泰豆氏  泰豆氏不教之以御而教之以先觀吾趣  蓋引而不發開而弗達使之深造乎自得  之妙而已射御末技猶且然爾矧夫道可  傳而不可受則示於此者正容而悟觀於
Interpretation

The passage employs the metaphor of charioteering to elucidate that the key to cultivating the Dao lies in grasping fundamental principles through repeated practice, ultimately attaining a state of natural mastery.

The art of charioteering operates thus: When walking across narrow wooden bridges, people precisely calculate their steps, leaving just enough space for their feet. Applying this principle to driving a chariot means leaving no excess wheel tracks beyond the wheels' path and no unnecessary space beyond the horses' hoofprints. Whether traversing perilous mountain valleys or open plains, one moves as effortlessly as walking on level ground. The essential points are: externally, one must harmonize with the horses' nature, using subtle rein and bit control to regulate speed; internally, one must maintain mental precision while mastering rhythmic hand movements. Thus when driving, every advance, retreat, and turn conforms to proper measure, and long journeys require no excessive effort.

A truly masterful charioteer achieves this: needing neither visual confirmation nor whip encouragement, all movements perfectly appropriate as if born with the skill—this is the realm of "expert charioteering." Like Ji Chang learning archery from Fei Wei, where the master first taught him to practice unblinking focus; or Zaofu learning charioteering from Taidou Shi, where the instructor first had him observe rhythmic footwork. These examples all demonstrate that true skill isn't directly taught, but rather guided until one personally apprehends its subtleties.

Cultivating the Dao follows the same principle ("Zhenghe" refers to governing the world's affairs). Without fundamental inner understanding, external actions lose direction; lacking proper guiding principles, practice cannot endure. Therefore Dao cultivation must begin with repeated practice—only upon genuine mastery do these principles become second nature. Just as an expert bowyer's son first learns basket-weaving, or an accomplished smith's son begins with leather-stitching, these are all foundations for developing fundamental skills.

 彼者目撃而存所謂自得其得宜如何哉  觀泰豆之御方其始也齊輯乎轡銜之際  急緩乎脣吻之和正度乎胸臆之中而執  節乎掌握之間内得於中心外合於馬志  故能進退履繩而旋曲中規矩取道致遠  而氣力有餘則由於法度之中未嘗敢越  有如此者迨其乆也得之於銜應之於轡  得之於轡應之於手得之於手應之於心  不以目視不以策驅心閑體正六轡不亂  二十四蹄所投無差迴旋進退莫不中節  則超乎法度之外不勉而中有如此耆若  夫要其終而言之則輿輪之外無餘徹馬  蹄之外無餘地未嘗覺山谷之嶮原隰之  夷視之一也則又無適而非行無行而非  道舉平與陂道通爲一奚往而不暇哉道  乎進其至此進乎技矣 魏黑卵以暱嫌殺丘邴章(暱嫌/私恨)  盧曰夫以私嫌而殺傷嗜慾而夭物者皆  世俗之常情非有道之士也 丘邴章之子來丹謀報父之讎丹氣甚猛形 甚露計粒而食順風而趨雖怒不能稱兵以 報之  有膽氣體羸虚不能舉兵器也 恥假力於人誓手劍以屠黑卵黑卵悍志絶 衆力抗百夫筋骨皮肉非人類也延頸承刃 披胸受矢鋩鍔摧屈而體無痕撻負其材力 視來丹猶雛鷇也來丹之友申他曰子怨黑 卵至矣黑卵之易子過矣將奚謀焉來丹垂 涕曰願子爲我謀申他曰吾聞衛孔周其祖
Interpretation

This scripture illustrates the state of "attaining the Dao" and the limitations of worldly hatred through two parables.

The first story tells of the master charioteer Taidou and his art of horsemanship. When first learning to drive, he needed complete concentration to control the reins and adjust speed, with every movement strictly following prescribed techniques. As his skill matured, he gradually reached the state of "unity between man and horse" where the reins' movements corresponded with his hands, his hands' motions connected with his mind, until eventually he needed neither eyes to see nor whip to urge - his mere intention could guide the horses freely, completely transcending technical constraints. This demonstrates how the true "Dao" surpasses formal techniques, achieving a state where one follows one's heart without overstepping boundaries.

The second parable recounts Lai Dan's quest to avenge his father. The Wei state's Hei Luan had murdered Qiu Bingzhang due to personal enmity, and the victim's son Lai Dan swore vengeance. Though burning with rage, his frail body couldn't even wield weapons. Ashamed to rely on others' strength, he vowed to kill Hei Luan personally. Yet Hei Luan possessed extraordinary physical resilience that repelled blades. Lai Dan's friend Shen Ta pointed out: "Hei Luan utterly despises you - how do you plan to take revenge?" Reduced to tears, Lai Dan could only beg for help.

Through these contrasting tales, the scripture reveals how the true "Dao" transcends formal constraints as the supreme state, while worldly hatred traps people in predicaments. Taidou's horsemanship evolves from following techniques to surpassing them, demonstrating the cultivator's ascension from "skill" to "Dao." Conversely, Lai Dan's revenge story exposes the limitations of those blinded by personal grudges.

得殷帝之寳劍一童子服之却三軍之衆奚 不請焉  盧曰天地至精之物但以威制於三軍若  以斷割爲功非至精者也 來丹遂適衛見孔周執僕御之禮請先納妻 子後言所欲孔周曰吾有三劍唯子所擇皆 不能殺人且先言其狀一曰含光視之不可 見運之不知有其所觸也泯然無際經物而 物不覺二曰承影將旦昧爽之交日夕昏明 之際此面而察之淡淡焉若有物存莫識其 狀其所觸也竊竊然有聲經物而物不疾也 三曰宵練方晝則見影而不見光  與日月同色也 方夜見光而不見形(言其/照夜)其觸物也騞然而 過(騞伏/墮切)隨過隨合覺疾而不血刃焉此三寳 者傳之十三世矣而無施於事(不能/害物)匣而藏 之未嘗啓封來丹曰雖然吾必請其下者孔 周乃歸其妻子與齋七日晏陰之間(晏晩/暮也)跪 而授其下劍來丹再拜受之以歸  以其可執可見故授其下者  盧曰器珍者則害物深至道至精無所傷  物 來丹遂執劍從黑卵時黑卵之醉偃於牖下 自頸腰三斬之黑卵不覺來丹以黑卵之 死趣而退遇黑卵之子於門繫之三下如投 虚黑卵之子方笑曰汝何蚩而三招予來丹 知劍之不能殺人也歎而歸黑卵旣醒怒其 妻曰醉而露我使我嗌疾而腰急其子曰疇
Interpretation

This tale recounts the legend of three divine swords. Kong Zhou possessed three marvelous swords named Hanguang ("Embracing Light"), Chengying ("Catching Shadows"), and Xiaolian ("Night Forge"). The first sword, Hanguang, was completely invisible to the eye—its presence couldn't be felt when swung, left no trace upon objects, and items it sliced wouldn't even register being touched. The second, Chengying, revealed only faint silhouettes when observed against light at dawn or dusk, emitting soft whispers upon contact yet causing no harm. The third, Xiaolian, cast shadows by day without revealing its form, glowed at night without showing its shape, and passed through objects instantaneously, leaving wounds that healed immediately—swift yet never scarring. These three blades had been passed down through thirteen generations, never once used to harm anyone, always kept sheathed in their cases.

Lai Dan (a character in the story) insisted on borrowing the most ordinary of these swords to seek revenge. Kong Zhou returned Lai Dan's wife and children to him, instructing him to observe seven days of purification (Zhaijiao) before kneeling at dusk to receive the blade. Lai Dan used it to strike his enemy Hei Luan three times across the neck and waist while the man lay drunk—yet Hei Luan remained oblivious. Believing his foe dead, Lai Dan departed, only to encounter Hei Luan's son whom he likewise thrust at three times—as if stabbing empty air. The son even laughed, saying, "Why are you waving at me so foolishly?" Only then did Lai Dan realize this sword couldn't kill. Sighing, he withdrew. Later when Hei Luan sobered up, he merely complained to his wife about catching cold while drunk, feeling throat pain and back stiffness. His son mentioned someone making strange gestures at him, completely unaware of being pierced by a sword.

Through the swords' extraordinary properties, this passage illustrates the Daoist principle that "the most refined essence (Jing) and the highest Dao harm nothing." Like precious artifacts that never truly injure, while common tools may cause harm, these three divine swords—the more marvelous they were, the less actual damage they inflicted—embody the Daoist wisdom that "great skill appears clumsy" (Da qiao ruo zhuo).

昔來丹之來遇我於門三招我使我體疾而 支彊彼其厭我哉  盧曰夫道至之人無傷於萬物萬物之害  亦所不能傷焉故毒蟲不螫猛獸不攫故  物之至精者亦無傷老子曰其神不傷人  是以聖人貴夫知者何以其不傷於萬物  者也  政和含光者襲明而不燿承影者處陰而  不移宵練晦之時練有形之質含光則無  有也故視之不見運之不有經物而不覺  承影則若有若無故雖莫識其狀而且或  聞其聲宵練則旣有矣爲其有形之質也  故晝見影焉爲其處晦之時也故夜見光  焉道以無爲上若有若無次之而囿於有  者爲下故三劍含光爲上承影次之宵練  爲下來丹之所受者其宵練與然是三者  不以斬决爲勝亦皆劍之神者矣天下有  常勝之道直之無前運之無旁而天下服  豈在於擊鬥爲哉故莊子以斬領决肺爲  庶人之劍也惜乎來丹不通乎此知劍之  不能殺人而後歎何以爲常胜之道乎  范曰黑卵則道之復乎至幽者邴章則道  之顯於至明者來丹則又至陽之色也故  以父之讎而謀報黑卵請劍於衛孔周焉  夫有千越之劍者匣而藏之不敢用也寳  之至也道之利用若是故直之無前舉之  無上按之無下運之無旁决浮雲絶地紀  恢恢然其於游刃有餘地矣來丹受劍於  孔周徒用之以復讎而已故因黑卵之醉
Interpretation

There was a man named Lai Dan who called at my gate three times, causing me physical discomfort and stiffness in my limbs. Was he showing contempt for me?

Lu Chongxuan (Tang Dynasty Daoist master) explains: Those who have truly attained the Dao do not harm all beings, and all beings cannot harm them. Therefore, poisonous insects will not sting them, and fierce beasts will not attack them. Even the most subtle phenomena cannot cause them harm. Laozi said, "Their Shen (spirit) does not injure people," which is why sages most value those who understand this principle—they comprehend the way of non-harming.

Annotations from the Zhenghe era (Emperor Huizong of Song) further clarify: The Han Guang Sword (legendary formless blade) inherits light without being dazzling; the Cheng Ying Sword (half-illusory blade) dwells in shadows yet never moves; the Xiao Lian Sword (physical blade) manifests substance in darkness. The Han Guang Sword is completely formless—invisible, intangible, passing through objects without sensation. The Cheng Ying Sword exists between being and non-being—its shape unclear yet its sound audible. The Xiao Lian Sword, being substantial, casts shadows by day and emits light by night.

At the level of the Dao, the formless and imageless is supreme, the seemingly existent yet non-existent is secondary, while attachment to physical form is the lowest. Thus among these three swords, Han Guang represents the highest grade, Cheng Ying the middle, and Xiao Lian the ordinary. Lai Dan likely obtained the Xiao Lian Sword. Yet none of these three swords achieves victory through slashing—all belong to the category of divine blades.

The true constant victory of the universe lies in unimpeded direct movement and frictionless operation that naturally brings all under heaven to submission—why resort to killing? Therefore, Zhuangzi considered decapitation and disembowelment mere commoners' swordplay. Unfortunately, Lai Dan didn't understand this principle. He sighed when his sword failed to kill, never comprehending what true constant victory means.

Fan Yingyuan (Song Dynasty Daoist) adds: Hei Luan (the intended target of revenge) symbolizes returning to the ultimate darkness of the Dao, while Bing Zhang represents manifesting the ultimate brightness. The name Lai Dan itself signifies extreme yang energy. Seeking vengeance for his father, he went to Kong Zhou of Wei to obtain swords. Those who truly possess the prized swords of Qian Yue treasure them carefully, never using them lightly—such is the most precious treasure. The application of the Dao operates similarly—moving directly without obstruction, having neither ceiling above nor foundation below, operating without friction, capable of severing floating clouds and cutting through earth veins with effortless ease. Lai Dan obtained swords from Kong Zhou yet used them only for revenge, thus striking when Hei Luan was drunk...

 自頸至腰三斬之則與夫上斬頸領下决  肝肺者無以異矣豈知所以用之道哉 周穆王大征西戎西戎獻錕鋙之劍火浣之 布其劍長尺有咫練綱亦刃用之切玉如切 泥焉火浣之布浣之必投於火布則火色垢 則布色出火而振之皓然疑乎雪(此周書/所云)皇 子以爲無此物傳之者妄蕭叔曰皇子果於 自信果於誣理哉  此一章斷後而說切玉劍火浣布者明上  之所載皆事實之言因此二物無虚妄者  盧曰夫金之不能切玉者非器之利也布  之不能澣於火火不燒者物之異也天地  之内萬物之多有可以理求者亦有非理  所及者然則玉雖堅有可刻之理劍雖鐵  有必斷之鋒也以必斷之鋒當可刻之物  不入者自非至利耳非無可切之理焉況  已有之何所疑也又動植之類其性不同  有因水火而生者有因水火而殺者故火  山之鼠得火而生風生之獸得風而活人  約空立魚約水存然則火浣之纑非紵非  麻布名與中國等火與鼠毛同此復何足  爲怪也果於自信不達矣夫  政和世之人以耳目所接者爲有而以其  所不及者爲無然八荒之外不可窮詰安  可以耳目所不及者遂以爲無哉  范曰切玉之刀火浣之布理固有之而拘  耳目之用者必以爲無是物焉又烏能知  極盡之際哉是篇必終之以此以明前之
Interpretation

This scripture explores the limitations of human cognition through two miraculous objects.

When King Mu of Zhou campaigned against the Western Rong tribes, they presented two treasures: a short sword that could cut jade like mud (Kunwu Sword), and a cloth cleansed by fire (Fire-Wash Cloth). When cast into flames, the stains on this cloth would reveal its true color, and upon removal, it would emerge white as snow. The crown prince dismissed these items as nonexistent, mere rumors. But Xiao Shu countered, arguing that this was the prince’s overconfidence leading him astray from truth.

The author uses this to illustrate a principle: that metal cannot cut jade does not mean the tool lacks sharpness, and that cloth resists fire does not make it ordinary. Among the myriad things of heaven and earth, some can be explained by common sense, while others transcend it. Just as hard jade still has properties that allow carving, and iron swords possess edges capable of cutting. If the sharpest sword meets the most carvable jade yet fails to slice, it only means the sword is not sharp enough—not that the jade cannot be cut.

The text further cites wondrous phenomena in nature: volcanic rodents thrive in fire, wind-born creatures depend on air currents, humans need breath, and fish require water. Though the Fire-Wash Cloth shares a name with Chinese textiles, its material and fire-resistant nature resemble the fur of those volcanic rodents—why should this be strange? Stubborn insistence on one’s own views only reveals the limits of one’s understanding.

Finally, it points out that people often take what they’ve seen as real and dismiss the unseen as false. But how can one deny the existence of things in the vastness of heaven and earth simply because they haven’t witnessed them? A blade that slices jade and a cloth that withstands fire are plausible in principle—those confined by personal experience naturally fail to comprehend them. Placing this passage at the end serves to affirm that all preceding accounts are factual.

 所載皆即當至理非徒侈空言以駭世故  也 沖虚至德眞經四解
Interpretation

The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing (Scripture of Perfect Virtue in the Empty Womb) records the most fundamental principles of Daoist wisdom, far removed from empty rhetoric or intimidating falsehoods. It expounds concrete, supreme truths of the highest order.

The term "Chongxu Zhide" (Perfect Virtue in the Empty Womb) refers to attaining the ultimate state of emptiness and perfected De (Virtue/Power). The "Four Explanations" present this scripture's profound meaning through four distinct interpretive perspectives. The fourteenth scroll further explores these core tenets, guiding practitioners toward deeper comprehension of the Dao (the Way).

卷之十四

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0123); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 13 Vol. 15 →