中文 · EN

《南華真經章句音義》Vol. 7

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 7 / 14 3,810 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經章句音義》 Vol. 7 (Dongshen 洞神部, 14 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 8 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經章句音義》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經章句音義卷之七習七    碧虚子造 雜篇盜跖十六    率性 孔子與柳下季爲友柳下惠姓展名獲字季 禽一云字子禽居柳下而施德惠一云惠謚 也一云柳下邑名按左傳云展禽是魯僖公 時人至孔子生八十餘年若至子路之死百 五六十歲不得爲友是寓言也盜跖之石切 李奇注漢書云跖秦之大盜也黄法師云季 弟名雍爲大盜秦人謂盜爲跖故時呼曰盜 跖從才用切卒尊忽切下同穴室摳户苦溝 切司馬本作樞尺朱切云破人户樞而取物 也入堡一本作保鄭注禮記云小城曰保能 詔詔告也或云訓也竊爲于僞切下請爲爲 我竊爲使爲以爲皆同說之始鋭切飄風婢 遥切易辱以豉切休卒徒於太山之陽於見 江南古藏本舊闕膾古外切說文細切肉也 餔蒲故切食也屈原曰餔其糟冠古亂切枝 木之冠冠多華飾如木之枝繁帶死牛之脇 許劫切司馬云取牛皮爲大草帶儌倖古堯 切儌倖冀望也願望履幕下司馬云幕作綦 云言視不敢望跖面望履蹟而還也綦履蹟 也反走小却行也瞋目赤眞亦夷二切廣雅 云張也如乳儒遇切育也凡天下人有三德 人見張君房本舊闕少長詩召切下丁丈切 勇悍户旦切激丹古歷切明也齊貝珠也一 作含貝音中丁仲切南使所吏切下三字同
Interpretation

This passage presents annotations and phonetic explanations from the Nanhua Zhenjing Zhangju Yinyi (Phonetic Meanings of the Zhuangzi by Chapter) concerning the "Robber Zhi" chapter in the Miscellaneous Chapters section. The main content includes:

The text first clarifies that the account of Confucius befriending Liu Xiahui (whose surname was Zhan, given name Huo, courtesy name Jiqin) is allegorical. According to Zuo's Commentary, Liu Xiahui lived during Duke Xi of Lu's reign, over eighty years before Confucius's time. By Zilu's death, the gap would have been 150-160 years, making genuine friendship impossible.

Annotations explain the meaning of "Robber Zhi": Li Qi's commentary on Records of the Han identifies Zhi as a notorious Qin dynasty bandit, while Master Huang's interpretation suggests he was Liu Xiahui's younger brother named Yong. Since Qin people called robbers "Zhi," he became known as Robber Zhi. The pronunciation of "Zhi" is noted (phonetically "cai yong qie").

Detailed explanations are provided for specific terms:

  • "Xue shi kou hu" (breaking into houses) refers to burglary (Sima Biao's version uses "shu," meaning breaking door hinges)
  • "Ru bao" (some versions use "bao") indicates a small walled town (as annotated by Zheng Xuan in Records of Rites)
  • "Zhao" means proclamation or instruction
  • "Kuai" denotes finely sliced meat
  • "Bu" means to eat (citing Qu Yuan's usage)
  • "Jiao xing" indicates wishful thinking or unrealistic hopes

The text describes Robber Zhi's attire: his "guan" (headpiece) was an ornate branch-like crown, and his "dai" (belt) was made of oxhide. Pronunciation notes and textual variants are provided.

Finally, it mentions that the record of "three virtues possessed by all people" is missing in Zhang Junfang's edition, with phonetic notations given for terms like "shao zhang" (young and old) and "yong han" (brave and fierce).

共祭音恭之行下孟切下同恒民一作順民 後亦爾好面呼報切下同背音佩下同橡音 象煬羊亮切炙燥也居居于于成云居居安 靜之容于于自得之貌蚩尤黄帝之時蚩尤 爲暴戰於涿鹿之野逐擒蚩尤身體殺異處 故别葬之涿鹿音卓司馬云地名故城今在 上谷郡西南八十里武王弑音試下同縫衣 扶恭切成云縫掖之衣也淺帶成云淺狹帶 也矯言紀表切去其起吕切危冠李云危高 也史記云仲由字子路下人也性鄙好勇力 志伉直冠雄雞冠佩猳豚陵暴孔子孔子設 禮稍誘子路後儒服委質請爲弟子子路爲 衛大夫聞孔悝之邑宰蕢聵乃與孔悝作亂 謀入立是爲莊公子路在外聞之馳往入造 蕢聵蕢聵與孔悝登臺子路欲蟠臺蕢聵懼 乃下石乞壺黶攻子路擊斷子路之纓子路 曰君子死而冠不免遂結纓而死一云身遭 菹醢其卒子恤切身菹莊居切菹醢也再逐 於魯削跡於衛並解禪王篇窮於齊史記云 孔子適齊爲高昭子家臣欲以通乎景公與 齊太師語樂聞韶音學之三月不知肉味齊 人稱之復景公恭見孔子待以季孟之間魯 有三卿季氏爲正卿最貴孟氏爲下卿不用 事言待之以二者之間也齊大夫欲害孔子 孔子聞之景公曰吾老矣弗能用也孔子遂 行此謂窮於齊也圍於陳蔡已解禪王篇堯
Interpretation

This passage primarily explains the pronunciation of certain terms and provides contextual background for allusions found in the Nanhua Zhenjing (i.e., Zhuangzi). We can understand it through several key points:

Regarding the term "共祭," here "共" is pronounced as "gōng" (恭), meaning "respectful." The phrase "恒民" appears in some versions as "顺民," referring to ordinary people.

The text mentions the legend of Chiyou: During the Yellow Emperor's reign, Chiyou was tyrannical and immoral. He engaged in a great battle with the Yellow Emperor at Zhuolu (located about 80 li southwest of present-day Zhuolu County in Hebei Province) and was ultimately captured and killed, with his body buried in separate locations. Zhuolu is an ancient place name.

It recounts the story of Confucius's disciple Zilu (Zhong You): Zilu had a bold and fierce temperament, fond of wearing a hat adorned with rooster feathers and carrying boar tusk ornaments. Later, he was transformed by Confucius's teachings on ritual propriety and became his student. Zilu later served as an official in the state of Wei. When he heard that Kuai Kui (later Duke Zhuang of Wei) was plotting rebellion with Kong Kui to seize power, he rushed to stop them. During the fight, his hatband was cut, and he declared, "A nobleman must die with his attire properly arranged." After retying his hatband, he was killed.

Regarding Confucius's travels through various states: He was repeatedly expelled from Lu, denied entry to Wei, and faced difficulties in Qi. The Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji) notes that when Confucius went to Qi, he sought to approach Duke Jing of Qi through Gao Zhaozi, studying the Shao music with Qi's court musicians so intently that for three months he couldn't even taste the flavor of meat. Though Duke Jing treated him with courtesy, his status remained between that of the Ji and Meng clans. Later, when Qi's ministers plotted against him, the duke—claiming he was too old to employ Confucius—forced him to leave. This is the origin of the phrase "reduced to hardship in Qi." Additionally, the text references his being besieged in the states of Chen and Cai.

These explanations primarily provide background knowledge for reading Zhuangzi, clarifying the historical figures and events alluded to in the text, as well as the pronunciation and meaning of certain specialized terms.

不慈不授丹朱天下舜不孝或謂避逃瞽叟 或謂不告而娶禹偏枯治水而得疾湯放其 主放桀於鳴條武王伐紂誅紂於牧野文王 拘羑里史記云紂醢九侯西伯昌聞之竊嘆 崇侯虎知之以告紂紂之二十年囚西伯於 羑里羑里獄名在河内湯陰而彊其丈切鮑 焦韓嬰云鮑焦周時隱士也衣弊膚見挈畚 採蔬遇子貢於道子貢曰吾子何以至此也 鮑焦曰天下之遺德教者衆矣吾何以不至 於此也吾聞之世不已知而行之不已者是 爽行也上不已知而千之不止者是毁廉也 行爽廉毁然且不舍惑於利也子貢曰吾聞 之非其世者不生其利汙其君者不履其土 今吾子污其君而履其土非其世而採其蔬 此誰之有哉鮑焦曰於戲吾聞賢人重進而 輕退廉士易醜而輕死乃棄其蔬而立槁死 於洛水之上君子聞之曰廉夫剛哉夫山鋭 則不高水狹則不深行特者其德不厚志與 天地疑者其爲人不祥鮑子可謂不祥矣其 節度淺深適至是而已矣或云抱木而立枯 焉申徒狄韓嬰云申徒狄商時人非其世將 自投於河崔嘉聞而止之曰吾聞聖人仁士 之於天地之間民之父母也今爲濡足之故 不救溺人可乎申徒狄曰不然昔者桀殺關 龍逄紂殺王子比干而亡天下吴殺子胥陳 殺泄治而滅其國故亡國殘家非无聖智也
Interpretation

This passage recounts the fates of several historical figures and recluses, revealing the moral dilemmas of survival in turbulent times.

Emperor Yao did not pass the throne to his unfilial son Danzhu, but instead chose Shun as his successor. Facing abuse from his blind father Gusou, some say Shun left home to escape hardship. Yu the Great worked himself to exhaustion controlling floods, resulting in partial paralysis. King Tang of Shang exiled the tyrant Jie to Mingtiao. King Wu of Zhou overthrew King Zhou of Shang, executing him at Muye. King Wen had previously been imprisoned by King Zhou at Youli (a Shang dynasty prison in present-day Tangyin, Henan).

Historical records state that King Zhou had Marquis Jiu minced into paste. When Marquis Ji Chang (later King Wen) heard this, he secretly sighed. Chong Houhu reported this to King Zhou, who then imprisoned the Western Marquis in Youli for seven years.

The narrative then turns to Bao Jiao, a Zhou dynasty recluse. Clad in tattered clothes while gathering wild vegetables with a basket, he encountered Zigong. When asked why he lived in such destitution, Bao Jiao replied: "Too many in this world have abandoned the Dao's teachings—how could I not be like this? To persist when knowing others won't understand is obstinacy; to remonstrate endlessly with a foolish ruler destroys one's integrity. Yet I cannot give up—am I deluded by personal gain?" Zigong countered: "If you consider the world corrupt, why pick vegetables here?" Bao Jiao sighed: "The worthy value action over withdrawal, and principled scholars endure humiliation to preserve their Qi (vital energy)." He then discarded his vegetables and starved himself to death by the Luo River. Later commentators said: "A mountain too jagged cannot form peaks; waters too narrow cannot become deep pools—those with extreme conduct lack abundant De (Virtue). Bao Jiao's harsh rigidity ultimately appeared inauspicious."

Finally, the story recounts Shen Tu Di, a Shang dynasty recluse. Preparing to drown himself in protest against the times, he was stopped by Cui Jia who argued: "Sages should save people from suffering like parents care for children." Shen Tu Di responded: "Jie executed Guan Longpang and Zhou killed Bi Gan—both rulers fell. Wu killed Wu Zixu and Chen killed Xie Zhi—both states perished. Kingdoms collapse not for lack of worthy men, but from failing to employ them."

不用故也遂負石沈於河君子聞之曰廉乎 如仁與智吾未見也介子推史記云介子推 晋人也文公反國以賞從士未至隱者介子 推推亦不言禄禄亦不及推推曰獻公子九 人唯君在耳惠懷无親外内棄之天未絶晋 必將有主主晋祀者非君而誰天寳開之二 三子以爲己力不亦誣乎竊人之財猶曰是 盜況貪天之功以爲己力乎下冒其罪上賞 其姦上下相蒙難與處矣其母曰盍亦求之 以死誰懟推曰尤而效之罪有甚焉且出怨 言不食其禄母曰亦使知之若伺對曰言身 之文也身欲隱安用文之文之是求顯也其 母曰能如此乎與汝偕隱至死不復見介子 推從者怜之乃懸書宫門曰龍欲上天五虵 爲輔龍已昇云四虵各入其宇一虵獨怨終 不見處所文公出見書曰此介子推也吾方 憂王室未圖其功使人召之則亡遂求所在 聞其入綿上山中於是文公環綿上山中而 封之以爲介推田號曰介山以記吾過且旌 善人一云文公待之不肯出求之不能得以 爲焚其山宜出及焚其山遂不出而燔死以 食音嗣燔死音煩燒也尾生魯人也或作微 生磔大竹客切張其尸曰磔史記封禪書云 秦德公初作伏祠社磔狗邑四門以禦蟲菑 流豕屠者烹豕曰流操七曹切瓢婢遥切而 乞者言上六人不得其死猶猪狗乞兒流轉
Interpretation

This passage recounts two famous historical anecdotes that both illustrate the principle of "rejecting fame and maintaining moral integrity."

The first story concerns Jie Zitui, a minister of the Jin State during the Spring and Autumn period. After Duke Wen of Jin (Chong'er) returned from nineteen years of exile to claim the throne, he rewarded his loyal followers but overlooked the reclusive Jie Zitui. When Jie's mother urged him to seek recognition, he replied: "Stealing others' possessions makes one a thief—how much worse is it to claim Heaven's merits as one's own?" He believed those courting rewards were deceiving their ruler. Ultimately, mother and son chose seclusion in Mianshan Mountain. When the duke realized his oversight and sent men to find Jie—who was rumored to be in Mianshan—he ordered the mountain set ablaze to force him out. Jie Zitui refused to emerge and perished clinging to a tree. The remorseful duke renamed the mountain Jieshan in his honor.

The second story involves Weisheng (also called Weisheng) of Lu State, known for his famous act of keeping faith. Having promised to meet a woman beneath a bridge, he clung to a pillar when she failed to appear and floodwaters rose, drowning rather than break his word. The text employs vivid metaphors—"ritually dismembered dogs" (referring to sacrificial rites) and "wandering swine"—to lament how these six figures (likely referencing various moral exemplars) all met tragic ends like vagrant beggars. This serves as poignant commentary on how moral steadfastness often brings misfortune.

Both stories embody the Daoist ideal of "withdrawing after accomplishing one's task" (功成身退). Though Jie Zitui's rejection of honors and Weisheng's adherence to promises led to tragic outcomes, their unyielding principles earned enduring admiration. The exclamation "How incorruptible!" (廉乎) precisely praises this quality of unsullied moral integrity.

溝中者也乞或作走利名見張君房本舊作 離子胥沈江吴越春秋云子胥諫吴王不聽 據地垂涕曰於乎哀哉遭此嘿嘿忠臣掩口 譖夫在側政教道壞謟諛无極邪說僞辭以 曲爲直舍譖攻忠將滅吴國宗廟既夷社稷 不食城郭丘墟殿生荆棘吴王大怒賜屬鏤 之劍令自裁子胥遂伏劍而死吴王乃取子 胥屍盛以鴟夷之器投之於江中比干剖心 史記云紂溼亂不止微子數諫不聽乃與太 師少師謀遂去比干曰爲人臣者不得不以 死爭則百姓何辜乃直言諫紂紂怒曰吾聞 聖人之心有七竅信有諸乎乃遂殺王子比 干刳視其心不過古卧切超也病瘦色又切 騏驥音其冀過隙去逆切亟紀力切忽也或 作極无復扶又切狂狂不定貌汲汲音急不 足貌芒然莫剛切據軾音式車前横木憑而 坐者得微微無也自灸乆又切走料音聊觸 也頭編音鞭幾不音祈近也    行義 子張史記云姓顓孫名師字子張孔子弟子 行義篤信滿苟得寓言也喻苟且所得以致 滿盈之人盍胡臘切何不也爲行下孟切下 同勸何不爲德行多信伸信同音說文屈伸 也經典信通作伸下同以義求之臧聚司馬 云謂臧獲盜濫竊聚之人則怍色見張君房 本舊作則有怍色宰相息亮切下相而同入 嫂先早切成云桓公名小白殺兄子糾納嫂
Interpretation

This passage recounts two famous historical tales of loyal ministers and a discussion on virtue (De).

The first story concerns Wu Zixu, a minister of the Wu State during the Spring and Autumn period. He advised King Fuchai against underestimating the enemy, but the king refused to listen. Kneeling in despair, Wu Zixu lamented: "How tragic! To serve such a foolish ruler—a loyal minister cannot even speak his mind." At court, slanderers held sway while corruption flourished; flattery became commonplace, turning black into white. These petty men persecuted the loyal and virtuous, ultimately leading to Wu's destruction—its ancestral temples ruined, altars of state abandoned, cities reduced to rubble, and palaces overgrown with thorns. In fury, King Fuchai granted Wu Zixu the Shulou sword to commit suicide. After his death, the king had his corpse stuffed into a leather sack and thrown into the river.

Next comes the story of Bi Gan, uncle of the tyrannical King Zhou of Shang. When the king wallowed in debauchery, Prince Weizi repeatedly remonstrated to no avail and finally left. Bi Gan declared: "As ministers, we must remonstrate even at the cost of our lives—how else shall the people survive?" He spoke bluntly to the king, who raged: "I've heard a sage's heart has seven apertures—is this true?" He then executed Bi Gan and cut open his heart to examine it.

The discussion on "practicing righteousness" cites the example of Zizhang (Zhuan Sunshi, a disciple of Confucius) to explore virtue (De). Those who gain profit through improper means remain inwardly unfulfilled. Why not cultivate virtue to attain true satisfaction? When one governs oneself through Dao and righteousness, even thieves would feel ashamed. The passage concludes with Duke Huan of Qi (Xiao Bai), who killed his nephew Jiu yet married his sister-in-law.

Through these historical anecdotes, the text reveals the tragedy of loyal ministers who suffered persecution for honest counsel, while emphasizing the importance of virtue cultivation and satirizing those who seek profit by any means.

爲家管仲賢人而臣輔之爲臣或作相弑君 申志切成云初孔子聞田成子弑簡公沐浴 而朝告於哀公曰陳怛弑其君請討之此賤 而下之也後受田成子聘兼納其幣此言行 之相違也論則力頓切悖戰布内切亦拂扶 弗切違也長幼丁丈切下長子同五紀司馬 云歲日月星辰歷數文云天爲地紀日爲星 紀君爲臣紀父爲子紀夫爲妻紀成云金木 水火士又仁義禮智信又祖父己身子孫六 位君臣父子夫婦文云易之六位也爲别彼 列切下同堯殺長子崔云堯殺長子考監明 成云不與丹朱位言義殺也吕覽曰堯有十 子舜有九子舜流母弟流放也孟子云舜封 象於有庳身爲天子而弟爲匹夫可謂親愛 之乎王季爲適周公殺兄史記云古公有長 子太伯次曰虞仲太姜生少子季歷季歷娶 太任皆賢婦人生昌有聖瑞古公曰我世當 有興者其在昌乎長子太伯虞仲知古公欲 立季歷以傳昌乃二人亡如荆蠻古公卒季 歷立是爲公季此乃王季爲適也武王伐紂 封弟周公旦於曲阜曰魯弟叔鮮於管弟叔 度於蔡武王崩太子誦代立是爲成王成王 少周公乃攝行政當國管叔蔡叔疑周公作 亂周公奉成王命誎管叔放蔡叔此乃周公 殺兄也儒者僞辭史記云孔子去陳過蒲會 公叔氏以蒲畔蒲人止孔子弟子有公良孺
Interpretation

This passage examines historically paradoxical phenomena in political ethics, focusing on acts like "regicide" and "kinslaying."

When Confucius heard that Tian Chengzi (a powerful minister of Qi) had assassinated Duke Jian of Qi, he immediately bathed, changed into formal attire, and petitioned Duke Ai of Lu to launch a punitive expedition. This seemed like upholding the righteousness of ruler-subject relations, yet later Confucius accepted gifts from Tian Chengzi, creating an apparent contradiction in his words and deeds.

The text cites several historical cases: Emperor Yao did not pass the throne to his eldest son Danzhu (said to be unworthy); Emperor Shun exiled his half-brother Xiang (though Mencius claims Shun enfeoffed Xiang in Youbi but kept him as a commoner); Wang Ji (Ji Li), a Zhou dynasty ancestor, inherited the throne because his elder brothers Taibo and Zhongyong voluntarily fled to the barbarian lands of Jing to yield their claim; and the Duke of Zhou (Dan) executed his rebellious brothers Guan Shu and Cai Shu, though this was done under King Cheng’s orders to suppress rebellion.

These examples reveal that the Confucian ideals of loyalty and filial piety often clashed with realpolitik. Moral frameworks like the "Five Bonds" (the fundamental relationships governing social order: heaven-earth, sun-moon, ruler-subject, father-son, and husband-wife) and the "Six Positions" (the hexagram lines in the Yijing, symbolizing ethical hierarchies such as ruler-subject and father-son) were frequently violated in power struggles.

The passage concludes with an anecdote about Confucius being detained by rebels in Pu during his stay in Chen, where his disciple Gongliang Ru fought fiercely to rescue him. Though seemingly tangential, this episode may imply that even sages could not escape moral dilemmas in times of chaos.

者以私車五乗從孔子其爲人長賢有勇力 謂曰吾昔從夫子遇難於匡今又遇難於此 命也已吾與夫子再罹難寧鬥而死甚疾蒲 人懼謂孔子曰苟母適衛吾出子與之盟出 孔子東門孔子遂適衛子貢曰盟可負邪孔 子曰要盟也神不聽且子正爲名假設之辭 也爲于僞切下爲利同不監本作鑑吾昔見 張君房本舊作日人實切訟於无約如字徐 於妙切訟論說也子胥抉眼史記云子胥諫 吴王不聽賜子胥屬鏤之劍以死將死曰抉 吾眼置之吴東門以觀越之滅吴也直躬論 語曰直躬者其父攘羊而子證之尾生鮑子 已解在前申子不自理史記云晋獻公太子 申生爲驪姬陰令人譖惡置毒藥於胙中泣 曰太子何忍也其父而欲弑代之况他人乎 且君老矣旦暮之人曾不能待而欲弑之太 子聞之奔新城獻公怒乃誅其傅杜原疑或 謂太子曰爲此藥者乃驪姬也太子何不自 辭明之太子曰吾君老矣非驪姬寢不安食 不甘即辭之君且怒之不可或謂太子曰可 奔他國太子曰被此惡名以出人誰内我我 自殺耳申生自殺於新城孔子不見母匡子 不見父文云仲尼歷聘不見母亡匡章齊人 諫其父爲父所逐終身不見父所傳文專切    安處 无足一本作无知樂意音洛下同故推正而 不忘也忘或作妄言君臣但推尋正道不忘
Interpretation

This passage recounts several historical anecdotes and Confucius' experiences:

When Confucius traveled between states with five private carriages, a tall, virtuous and courageous attendant said to him: "When we were in danger at Kuang with you before, and now we face peril again here—this is surely fate. I would rather fight to the death." The men of Pu grew fearful and told Confucius: "If you promise not to go to Wei, we'll let you go." After establishing this covenant, Confucius departed through the eastern gate—yet still proceeded to Wei. Zigong asked: "Can one break a covenant?" Confucius replied: "An oath made under compulsion is not recognized by the spirits."

The text also references several classical allusions: Before Wu Zixu was executed by the King of Wu, he demanded his eyes be gouged out and hung on the eastern gate so he could witness Yue's destruction of Wu; "Upright Gong" reported his own father for stealing a sheep; Weisheng died clinging to a pillar to keep his promise; Crown Prince Shensheng of Jin, framed by his stepmother Li Ji, chose suicide over defending himself, fearing his aged father couldn't live without Li Ji's care.

Finally, it mentions Confucius being unable to see his mother during his travels, and Kuang Zhang (a Qi minister) being exiled for admonishing his father, never meeting him again. These stories explore conflicts between loyalty, filial piety, integrity and reality. The term "footless" (or "ignorant") here refers to investigating the true Dao without forgetting one's roots—when discussing ruler-minister relations, one should follow the Dao while remembering fundamentals.

(Note: This composite passage primarily reflects Confucian reflections on loyalty, filial duty and moral choices in adversity. Its inclusion in the Daoist classic Nanhua Zhenjing demonstrates the tradition's accommodation and reconsideration of Confucian ethics.)

故不用富貴邪爲智力不足故不用邪絶俗 過世之士焉言人心易動但人與賢人俱生 便自謂過於世人況親自爲富貴者乎慘七 感切怛丹曷切之恐丘勇切窮美窮猶盡也 究勢究竟也俠人音協欲惡烏路切爭四處 黄疏云湯武也按商書云葛伯不祀湯始伐 之其後東征西夷怨南征北狄怨皆曰徯我 后后來其蘇此豈非爭四處邪要名一遥切 亦猶見江南古藏本舊闕長阨音厄管籥音 藥一本管籥作壎箎口嗛苦簟切醪醴力刀 切侅音礙飲食至咽爲侅於馮氣音憤滿也 下同言憤畜不通之氣也上坂見張君房本 舊闕取慰亦作畏張君房本辱不舍音捨下 同戚醮在遥切李云顦顇也疑刦許業切内 周棲疏李云重棲内帀踠軒外通設備守具 也財單音丹或作蘄繚音了纏繞貌 南華眞經章句音義卷
Interpretation

This passage primarily explains the pronunciation and meanings of terms from the Nanhua Zhenjing (Classic of Southern Florescence), addressing several key concepts:

Regarding the interpretation of "not pursuing wealth and rank": It clarifies that truly realized Daoists refrain from seeking worldly prosperity not due to incapacity, but through conscious transcendence of mundane concerns. Those self-proclaimed "transcendent scholars" who consider themselves superior are actually vulnerable to external influences—when they attain wealth and status, they paradoxically develop deeper anxieties and fears (the phrase "canda zhi kong" refers to profound dread).

The text cites the historical account of King Tang's campaign against Count Ge: When King Tang of Shang attacked Count Ge for neglecting sacrificial rites, and later during his military campaigns, the common people would say, "We await our sovereign to deliver us." This illustrates how warfare provokes widespread resentment ("zheng sichu" denotes stirring conflicts in all directions).

Pronunciation guides and definitions for specialized terms:

  • "Gai" describes the state of food just being swallowed
  • "Fenxu zhi qi" refers to stagnant or obstructed internal energy (Qi)
  • "Qijiao" indicates a haggard facial appearance
  • "Nei zhouqi" denotes tightly fortified internal structures
  • "Caidan" is interchangeable with "dan" (elixir); some versions use "qiliao," meaning entwined or coiled

These annotations provide essential phonetic and semantic explanations for obscure terms in the Nanhua Zhenjing, demonstrating classical scholars' textual research. The noted variations between versions like the Zhang Junfang edition and Jiangnan ancient manuscripts reflect textual evolution during transmission.

之七

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0129); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 6 Vol. 8 →