中文 · EN

《南華真經循本》Vol. 5

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 5 / 30 6,563 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經循本》 Vol. 5 (Dongshen 洞神部, 30 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 13 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經循本》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經循本卷之五聴十   廬陵竹峯羅勉道述   門人彭祥點校  內篇    人間世(寧能高飛遠走不在人世間/故此篇言所以處人間世之)    道 顔回見(音/現)仲尼請行曰奚之曰將之衛曰奚 爲焉曰回聞衛君(出公/輒)其年壯其行獨輕用 其國而不見其過輕用民死死者以國量乎 澤若蕉民其無如矣  量猶準也澤如雲夢之類蕉草也言死者  甚衆以其國準之澤國人之死如澤中草  焉即陳逢滑曰吾日敝於兵暴骨如莽民  其無如者動觸刑戮無所逃也 回嘗聞之夫子曰治國去之亂國就之醫門 多疾  醫門正欲人之多疾以行其術猶亂國可  以行其道 願以所聞思其則  願以所聞於夫子者思其治衛之法 庶幾其國有瘳乎仲尼曰譆若殆往而刑耳 夫道不欲雜雜則多多則擾擾則憂憂而不 救古之至人先存諸己而後存諸人所存於 己者未定何暇至(及/也)於暴人之所行且若亦 知夫德之所蕩而知之所爲出乎哉德蕩乎 名知出乎爭名也者相軋也知也者爭之器 也二者凶器非所以盡行也且德厚信矼(確/實) (也)未達人氣名聞不爭未達人心  厚信在於氣質故言未達人氣不爭在於  心意故言未達人心 而强以仁義繩墨之言術(讀作/述)暴人之前者
Interpretation

Yan Hui (a disciple of Confucius) went to see Confucius (Zhongni) to bid farewell before a long journey. When Confucius asked his destination, Yan Hui replied he was going to Wei. Asked about his purpose, Yan explained: "I hear the ruler of Wei (Duke Chu Zhe) is in his prime yet governs autocratically, recklessly expending state resources without recognizing his faults. He casually sends commoners to their deaths—the corpses pile up like mountains, thick as reeds in marshlands, leaving the people utterly desperate."

Here "measure" refers to evaluation, "marsh" indicates vast wetlands like Yunmeng Marsh, and "reeds" means wild grass. The metaphor conveys that casualties are so numerous they resemble marsh reeds when measured against Wei's entire population. As Chen Fenghua once lamented: "Daily we suffer war's devastation—exposed bones proliferate like weeds, leaving commoners truly nowhere to flee."

Yan Hui continued: "I recall your teaching: 'Well-governed states may be left behind, while chaotic ones demand intervention—just as doctors' doorways crowd with the ill.' Physicians desire patients to practice healing arts; troubled states provide arenas to implement governance. I wish to apply your teachings, devise remedies for Wei's ailments—might this not help restore the state?"

Confucius sighed deeply: "Alas! You risk execution with this venture! The Dao abhors fragmentation—fragmentation breeds complications, complications disturb the spirit, spiritual disturbance spawns calamity, and calamity becomes irreparable. Ancient Dao-realized individuals first established correctness within themselves before influencing others. Your inner cultivation remains unsteady—how could you rectify a tyrant's conduct?"

"Moreover, do you understand why virtue decays and wisdom invites disaster? Virtue decays through reputation-seeking; wisdom invites disaster by provoking contention. Reputation makes men undermine each other; wisdom becomes a tool for strife. Both are perilous instruments unfit for self-cultivation. Even with profound virtue and unshakable integrity (矼 denotes solidity), you may fail to transform others; even avoiding fame and profit, you may not move hearts."

"If you forcibly impose the carpenter's square and line (绳墨 originally marking tools, here symbolizing rigid moral standards) to lecture a tyrant on benevolence and righteousness..." (The original text breaks off here, implying the dangers of such an approach)

是以人惡有其美也命之曰菑(音/灾)人菑人者 人必反菑之若殆爲人菑夫句且苟爲悦賢 而惡不肖惡用而求有以異若(汝/也)唯無詔王 公必將乗人而鬭其捷而目將熒之  目爲其所眩 而色將平之  色與之和平 口將營之  營救自解 容將形之  爲擎跽之形 心且成之  且遂成其非 是以火救火以水救水名之曰益多  不能正救更添其過 順始無窮若殆以不信厚言必死於暴人之 前矣  彼順其始之惡無有窮極汝若諫之則必  以汝言爲不信厚怒汝而不免於刑戮矣 且昔者桀殺關龍逄紂殺王子比干是皆脩 其身以下傴拊人之民以下拂其上者也故 其君因其脩以䄢(音/祭)之是好名者也昔者堯 攻叢枝胥敖禹攻有扈國爲虚(音/墟)厲  居宅無人曰虚死而無後曰厲 身爲刑戮其用兵不止其求實無己是皆求 名實者也而獨不聞之乎名實者聖人之所 不能勝(平/聲)也而況若乎  叢枝胥敖欲與堯爭名實有扈欲與禹爭  名實堯禹猶且不能堪而伐之何況於汝  乎 雖然若必有以也嘗以語我來顔回曰端而 虚勉而一則可乎曰惡惡可夫以陽爲充孔 揚采色不定常人之所不違因案人之所感 以求容與其心名之日漸之德不成而況大
Interpretation

This passage explains how conflicts and calamities among people often stem from self-promotion and the pursuit of fame and profit. When a person constantly flaunts their virtues, it is like inviting disaster upon themselves (菑人), and others will inevitably retaliate with harm. For instance, if you try to win over the virtuous by disparaging the unworthy, this very act sets you apart and invites misfortune.

When facing those in power, if you speak bluntly to admonish them, they may use your words as fuel for contention. Your eyes may become dazzled by their authority, your expression unconsciously deferential, your words preoccupied with self-justification, your body adopting submissive postures, and your mind even gradually swayed to accept their wrongdoings. This is akin to using fire to extinguish fire or water to stop water—it only exacerbates the problem (益多). If you blindly indulge their misdeeds without remonstrating, you may ultimately perish at the hands of a tyrant for speaking too frankly.

History offers grim examples: the tyrant Jie of Xia executed his loyal minister Guan Longfeng, and King Zhou of Shang killed Prince Bi Gan—both victims of their own self-cultivation and care for the people, which provoked their rulers’ wrath. Their sovereigns, resentful of their virtuous reputations, murdered them out of jealousy. Similarly, Emperor Yao waged war against Congzhi and Xu’ao, while Yu attacked Youhu, reducing these states to ruins (虚厉) and their people to extinction. These conflicts arose from struggles over reputation and gain (名实)—even sages could not avoid such contention, let alone ordinary people.

Finally, Yan Hui asked Confucius: If a person remains upright, humble, diligent, and single-minded, can they evade such calamities? Confucius replied: That alone is insufficient. If one’s heart brims with excessive yang energy (阳为充), their outward demeanor radiates brilliance, and their emotions fluctuate unpredictably, even common folk would find it hard to resist, much less influence others. Such superficial virtue (渐之德) cannot accomplish even small things—how much less great ones?

德乎將執而不化外合而内不訾其庸詎可 乎  端正而謙虚所以盡乎已黽勉而專一所  以入乎人夫以陽爲充孔揚言衛君以充  陽之性自爲充足甚揚揚得志也采色不  定常人之所不違者喜怒無定人莫敢逆  之也案與按同感觸也容與猶縱肆也因  按抑人之觸己以求縱肆其心也日漸之  德不成而況大德乎者言逐日積漸之德  且不能成何況大德乎執固執也訾毁也  彼將固執而不化汝必外與之合而心内  亦不復訾毁之矣然則汝之所謂端而虚  勉而一者豈可乎外合而内不訾即前所  謂容將形之心且成之者也 然則我内直而外曲成而上比(去/聲)内直者與 天爲徒與天爲徒者知天子之與己皆天之 所子而獨以己言蘄乎而人善之蘄乎而人 不善之邪若然者人謂之童子是之謂與天 爲徒  顔回更說此三條内直而外曲者由内徑  直而外爲委曲也成而上比者舉其成說  上合於古人也内由徑直則順乎其天故  曰與天爲徒天子與己皆天之所子是已  與天子皆子而已何能相勝而獨以己言  求人之從是己乃勝於天子邪若能知此  理而不以己救勝則全天所以皆相子之  意故曰若然者謂之童子言尚如童子時  未分是非也此之謂與天爲徒 外曲者與人之爲徒也擎跽曲拳人臣之禮
Interpretation

This passage discusses how practitioners should properly balance inner cultivation with outward conduct.

First, it points out that if someone appears upright and humble on the surface (端正而谦虚) yet remains stubborn in their views inwardly (执而不化), or seems harmonious with others externally (外合) while constantly criticizing them in their heart (内不訾), such a state is unacceptable. It is like how excessive sunlight can lead to arrogance (阳为充孔扬), exemplified by the temperament of the Duke of Wei (卫君), whose moods were unpredictable (采色不定), and whom no one dared to oppose. This approach of suppressing others to indulge one’s own desires (因按抑人之触己以求纵肆其心) makes it difficult to cultivate even minor virtues (日渐之德不成), let alone great Virtue (De).

The text then illustrates the correct approach through three principles proposed by Yan Hui (颜回), a disciple of Confucius:

The first is "inner integrity with outward flexibility" (内直而外曲)—maintaining inner righteousness while adapting one’s external behavior appropriately. Inner integrity means aligning with the Dao (与天为徒), recognizing that both oneself and the ruler are children of Heaven (皆天之所子), and not forcing others to agree with one’s views (不以己言求人之从). Preserving this pure state is like the innocence of a child (童子), free from distinctions—this is called "walking with Heaven" (与天为徒).

The second principle, "outward flexibility," refers to being adaptable in social interactions (与人之为徒), such as observing proper rituals like kneeling and bowing (擎跽曲拳), which are fundamental courtesies.

The third principle, "forming views by drawing from the past" (成而上比), means grounding one’s arguments in classical texts (举其成说) and ensuring they align with the teachings of ancient sages (上合于古人).

This passage emphasizes the need for Daoist practitioners to cultivate both inner and outer refinement: maintaining inner purity and spontaneity while skillfully conforming to worldly etiquette; upholding personal principles while wisely absorbing the wisdom of predecessors.

也人皆爲之吾敢不爲邪爲人之所爲者人 亦無疵焉是之謂與人爲徒  外爲委曲所以周旋人事故曰與人爲徒 成而上比者與古爲徒其言雖教謫之實也 古之有也非吾有也若然者雖直不爲病是 之謂與古爲徒  舉古人之成說以告之其言不過誦說教  詔而實所以爲箴規蓋以此乃古人所有  之言非吾所有也如此貝雖直不至爲害  此之謂與古爲徒 若是則可乎仲尼曰惡惡可大多政法而不 諜  不能間諜入之 雖固亦無罪雖然止是耳已夫胡可以及化 猶師心者也  猶是自師用其心者 顔回曰吾無以進矣敢問其方仲尼曰齋吾 將語若有而爲之其易邪易之者皞天不宜 顔回曰回之家貧唯不飲酒不茹葷者數月 矣若此則可以爲齋乎曰是祭祀之齋非心 齋也回曰敢問心齋仲尼曰若一志無聽之 以耳而聽之以心無聽之以心而聽之以氣 聽止於耳心止於符氣也者虚而待物者也  符猶言性也揚雄答賔戲愼脩所志守尔  天符言性與天符故謂之符如符劵然聽  聲則止於耳心思則止於符唯氣則無所  思惟虚而待物 唯道集虚虚者心齋也顔回曰回之未始得 使實自回也得使之也未始有回也  未知道則百骸無所聽命實自是一顔回  既得道則唯虚而已何有此身哉
Interpretation

This passage presents Zhuangzi's teachings on human conduct and spiritual cultivation through a dialogue between Confucius and Yan Hui.

The discussion begins with two approaches to worldly interactions: The first is "walking with the crowd" (与人为徒), conforming to societal norms by following what others do, thereby avoiding criticism. The second is "walking with the ancients" (与古为徒), quoting the words of sages to guide others—though straightforward, this method avoids blame since the words belong to the ancients, not oneself.

Confucius considers both approaches insufficient because they remain attached to personal views. When Yan Hui asks for a higher method, Confucius introduces the practice of "fasting of the heart-mind" (心斋).

This "fasting" is not an external abstention from meat but an inner cultivation. It involves three stages: First, focus—listening not with the ears but with the heart-mind. Second, transcending even the heart-mind to perceive through Qi (气), the vital energy. Third, attaining a state of emptiness, where the mind becomes utterly clear and receptive. Qi here refers to the capacity of emptiness to contain all things.

In the end, Yan Hui realizes: Before attaining the Dao (道), he perceived himself as a solid, separate being; after realization, he enters a state of emptiness where even the concept of "self" dissolves. This is likened to a tally (符契)—only when the two halves perfectly align can resonance occur. Spiritual cultivation, then, is about refining the mind to this absolute emptiness, merging with the Dao.

可謂虚乎夫子曰盡矣吾語若若能入遊其 樊而無感其名入則鳴不入則止無門無毒 一宅而寓於不得已則幾矣  以禽爲喻衛以其國爲樊籠顔回欲往衛  如入樊籠焉但當入游其國而無感動其  赫奕之名謂之入游則雖入而有遨遊自  得之意不拘於所遇若得入則諫若不得  則止不必定要得入也却言得入後居止  之道衛本非可居無一門而無毒但得一  宅以居而寄此身於不得已可也寓寄也  不必執著之意如此則得與衛侯相近矣  幾近也此是教顔回且入身去住待居乆  而自化也下文却教以化之之道 絶迹易無行地難  人要絶滅蹤跡易而無行地難欲不見蹤  跡何如無行 爲人使易以僞爲天使難以僞  雖是人事便有天理人可欺而天不可欺  ○此四句言顔回當泯形迹黜浮偽 聞以有翼飛者矣未聞以無冀飛者也(喻下/句) 聞以有知知(上去/聲)者矣未聞以無知知者也  無知之知乃大知未聞有如此人○此四  句言顔回當外智巧 瞻彼闋者虚室生白吉祥止止  却告顔回以虚心之說瞻彼門闋之内有  室猶人身之有心也虚室無蔽碍則自然  生白而百祥萃止虚心無蔽碍則自然光  明而萬善凝止止止者止而又止也陰陽  者流飛九星而以中官得白爲吉祥亦取  其虚空無碍也
Interpretation

This passage presents Zhuangzi instructing his disciple Yan Hui on maintaining a mind of emptiness and stillness when engaging with the world. Using a birdcage as a metaphor for the state of Wei, Yan Hui wishes to enter Wei to admonish its ruler—much like a bird entering a cage. Zhuangzi advises him: once inside, preserve a detached state of mind, unmoved by empty reputation. Offer counsel when possible, but cease when ineffective, without forcing the matter. Reside in Wei as if temporarily lodging there, free from attachment—only then might one influence the ruler of Wei.

Several metaphors then illustrate principles for worldly engagement: erasing footprints is easy, but walking without leaving traces is difficult (referring to the near-impossibility of completely concealing one's presence); people may deceive others through pretense, but cannot deceive the principles of heaven (emphasizing sincerity); only birds with wings can fly—none without wings do so (highlighting the need for genuine capability); we observe those who understand through knowledge, but never those who comprehend without it (underscoring how true wisdom transcends superficial learning).

The passage concludes with the metaphor "an empty room generates brightness" (虚室生白): just as an uncluttered space naturally fills with light, a mind maintained in serene emptiness—free from distracting thoughts—naturally manifests wisdom and gathers auspicious energy. The phrase "止止" (zhi zhi) denotes the continuous preservation of this empty stillness. Ancient Yin-Yang practitioners regarded the white color of the central palace (中宫) as symbolizing good fortune, also drawing from this concept of unimpeded emptiness.

The core teaching emphasizes embodying emptiness and wuwei (non-action), relinquishing attachments and contrivances to engage the world with one's natural, authentic mind.

夫且不止是之謂坐馳  比心放縱不知所止則身雖靜而心不靜  故謂之坐馳 夫徇耳目内通而外於心知鬼神將來舍而 況人乎  耳目本外而徇之於内心知本内而黜之  於外惟虚而已如此則鬼神將來與我並  處而況人乎舍字應前宅字 是萬物之化也禹舜之所紐也伏義几蘧(古/之) (帝)之所行終而況散上聲焉者乎  前虚心之道乃萬物之所由以感化也乃  禹舜之所以爲樞紐也伏羲几蘧所行以  終身也而況衛君不過散雜之人耳何難  化之有如言散卒散馬不與正數 葉(音/攝)公子高將使於齊問於仲尼曰王使諸 梁也甚重齊之待使者蓋將甚敬而不急匹 未猶未可動也而況諸侯乎吾甚慄之子嘗 語諸梁也曰凡事若小若大寡不道以懽成  言必以懽好而成 事若不成則必有人道之患(人之/刑責)若成則必 有陰陽之患  憂思以致陰陽不調而成疾 若成若不成而後無患者唯有德者能之吾 食也執粗而不臧爨無欲清之人今吾朝受 命而夕飲冰我其内熱與  粗糲食也不臧不精善也欲清者苦熱而  欲清凉也言吾所食但執粗糲而不精善  厨爨蕭然爨者不必苦熱而思清凉今乃  朝受使齊之命而夕飲冰此憂思之過遂  成内熱非飲食之過也 吾未至乎事之情
Interpretation

This passage conveys two key teachings:

The first explains the concept of "sitting in motion" (坐驰). It means that when the mind runs wild without restraint, though the body remains seated, the thoughts race uncontrollably like galloping horses. The true elevated state requires turning the external senses (eyes and ears) inward while expelling mental distractions outward, maintaining a state of empty stillness. In such a state, even spirits and deities would dwell with you, let alone ordinary people.

The second teaching uses the story of Lord Ye's mission to Qi to illustrate principles of conduct. Anxious about his diplomatic assignment, Lord Ye received Confucius' advice: Whether handling major or minor affairs, one should approach them with joyful equanimity. Failure invites criticism, while success might bring illness from overthinking. Only those with virtuous character (De) remain unaffected by either outcome. Lord Ye confessed that while normally content with simple fare, his current anxiety over the mission required drinking ice water to cool his agitation - showing how mental distress manifests physically.

The text references ancient sage-kings like Yu, Shun, Fuxi and Ji Qu who practiced this way of empty stillness throughout their lives. Ordinary rulers like the Duke of Wei should particularly emulate such self-cultivation methods.

 實也未曾做到事之實處 而既有陰陽之患矣事若不成必有人道之 患是兩也爲人臣者不足以任(平/聲)之子其有 以語我來仲尼曰天下有大戒二其一命也 其一義也子之愛親命也不可解於心  天所命之理仁愛出於自然未嘗與此心  相離也 臣之事君義也無適而非君也  普天之下莫非王土率土之濱莫非王臣 無所逃於天地之間是之謂大戒是以夫事 其親者不擇地而安之孝之至也夫事其君 者不擇事而安之忠之盛也自事其心者哀 樂不易施乎前(易更/遞也)知其不可柰何而安之 若命德之至也爲人臣子者固有所不得己 行事之情而忘其身何暇至於悦生而惡死 夫子其行可矣丘請復以所聞凡交近則必 相靡以信  近者相靡服以信不待有言 遠則必忠之以言言必或傳之夫傳兩喜兩 怒之言天下之難者也  兩處之言皆喜皆怒 兩喜必多溢美之言兩怒必多溢惡之言  如兩國皆喜則其言必有過相稱美處兩  國皆怒則其言必有過相詆訾處傳者所  以爲難 凡溢之類也妄妄則其信之也莫莫則傳言 者殃故法言曰(古/書)傳其常情無傳其溢言則 幾乎全且以巧鬭力者始乎陽常卒乎陰泰 至則多奇巧  以巧而鬭力如漢書卞射武戲如起於戲
Interpretation

This passage discusses the two fundamental principles one must face in life: Heavenly Mandate (天命) and Daoist Righteousness (道义). Confucius said that loving one's parents is a Heavenly Mandate—this innate familial bond cannot be erased from the heart. Serving one's ruler, however, belongs to Daoist Righteousness, for all under heaven is the sovereign's domain, leaving us nowhere to escape. These two matters represent life's greatest constraints.

A truly filial person does not pick and choose circumstances but can put their parents at ease in any situation. A genuinely loyal official does not select tasks but fulfills their duty in any position. Those who cultivate their inner nature (性) remain composed through all emotions—joy, anger, sorrow, and pleasure—and achieve the highest virtue (德) by peacefully accepting what cannot be changed. As subjects, we inherently have unavoidable responsibilities; we should immerse ourselves completely, forgetting personal safety—how could there be time for clinging to life and fearing death?

In human interactions, close relationships are maintained through sincerity (信), requiring few words. Distant relationships, however, demand verbal expressions of loyalty, though conveying messages accurately proves particularly difficult. When both parties are joyful, messages tend toward exaggerated praise; when both are angry, they lean toward amplified slander. All exaggerated words lack reliability, and unreliable words bring calamity upon the messenger. Thus ancient texts advise: "Convey the truth, not embellished words, for only then can you preserve yourself."

Consider those who wrestle with technique: they begin with open fairness but often end in covert deceit. When skill is pursued excessively, it gives birth to countless cunning artifices.

 巧無他姦計是爲屬陽卒恐不勝遂相侵  牟屬陰矣 以禮飲酒者始乎治常卒乎亂泰至則多竒 樂凡事亦然始乎諒(信/也)常卒乎鄙(野/也)其作始 也簡其將畢也必巨言者風波也行者實喪 也夫風波易以動實喪易以危  言虚如波之隨風故易以動行實常患喪  失故易以危 故忿設無由巧言偏辭獸死不擇音氣息茀 然於是並生心厲  若遇所與言之人施其忿怒不問情由則  只得巧言偏辭如獸之將死不暇擇其聲  音美惡惟覺氣息茀然不平而已於是有  陰陽之患而並生心病 剋核大至則必有不肖之心應之而不知其 然也  剋核剋定而核實必欲與之求詳也 苟惟不知其然也孰知其所終故法言曰無 遷令無勸成過度益也遷令勸成殆事  此兩句是總括兩法言傳其溢言則過其  則度乃是添益改其命令勸其成好則事  危殆 美成在乆惡成不及改  美之成甚難歷乆而後成惡之成甚遠不  及於欲改 可不愼與且夫乗物以遊心託不得已以養 中至矣何作爲報也莫若爲致命此其難者  何必作爲巧偽以報白齊君但致楚君之  命而已又恐葉公以爲迂闊終之曰此其  難者應上文天下之難者也 顔闔(魯之/隱者)將傳衛靈公太子而問於蘧伯玉 曰有人於此其德天殺  殺物之心如出於天性
Interpretation

This scripture teaches the importance of prudence in human affairs, warning against the dangers of clever words and excessive demands.

When one acts with excessive cunning, they easily fall into overt scheming (yang strategies), yet may ultimately lose control of the situation, leading to mutual harm; while covert scheming (yin strategies) belongs to the realm of treachery. Like drinking wine that begins with proper etiquette but often ends in chaos, excessive indulgence gives rise to all manner of strange occurrences. All affairs follow this pattern—what begins with trustworthiness and reliability ultimately degenerates into crudeness. What starts simply must inevitably conclude in complexity.

Words are like ripples swaying with the wind, easily unsettled and unstable; while concrete actions often carry the fear of failure, easily leading to peril. When anger arises without cause, one utters honeyed words or extreme statements, much like a dying beast that cannot choose its cries and can only produce desperate gasps. At such moments, the heart simultaneously generates the calamity of yin-yang imbalance and spiritual sickness.

When demands upon others become too harsh, they inevitably develop wicked thoughts in response, while the demander remains unaware of the reason. Without understanding the origins of a matter, how can one foresee its outcome? Thus the ancient saying: "Do not arbitrarily alter commands, do not force matters to completion—excess becomes chaos." Both changing commands and forcing outcomes render affairs precarious.

Beautiful accomplishments require long accumulation, while evil consequences, once formed, leave no time for correction. How can one not be cautious? The supreme way of conducting oneself is to follow nature's course, allowing the spirit to wander freely, while cultivating the inner self when compelled by circumstances. Why employ clever tricks in response? Better to honestly fulfill one's mission—this is truly the most difficult achievement.

The passage concludes with the story of Yan He (a recluse of Lu) consulting Qu Boyu: When appointed as tutor to the crown prince of Duke Ling of Wei, Yan He asked Qu Boyu, "There is a man with a cruel, murderous nature..." (introducing a parable about educational challenges).

與之爲無方則危吾國與之爲有方則危吾 身其知適足以知人之過而不知其所以過 若然者吾柰之何蘧伯玉曰善哉問乎戒之 愼之正汝身哉形莫若就心莫若和雖然之 二者有患就不欲入和不欲出  刑就則不睽隔又不可入其所好而與之  詭隨心和則不乖戾又不可表𣞺於外而  自矜伐 形就而入且爲顚爲滅爲崩爲蹶心和而出 且爲聲爲名爲妖爲孽彼且爲嬰兒亦與之 爲嬰兒彼且爲無町畦亦與之爲無町畦彼 且爲無崖亦與之爲無崖達之入於無疵  此豈徒然哉必達之入於無疵過之地 汝不知夫螳蜋乎怒其臂以當車轍不知其 不勝任也是其才之美者也  螳蜋以臂能當物爲才美 戒之愼之積伐而美者以犯之幾矣  伐誇也而汝也幾危也積其誇汝之才美  以犯之其身危矣 汝不知夫養虎者乎不敢以生物與之爲其 殺之之怒也不敢以全物與之爲其决之之 怒也  生物則必殺全物則必决因而生怒 時其飢飽達其怒心虎之與人異類而媚養 己者順也故其殺者逆也  性之順逆也 夫愛馬者以筐盛(平/聲)矢以蜄盛溺  蜄蚌也以蚌飾器也 適有蚊虻僕縁而拊之不時則缺銜毁首碎 胷意有所至而愛有所亡可不愼邪  僕縁僕僕然著馬體也虎馬之性以喻衛  太子
Interpretation

The scripture employs vivid analogies to illustrate the principle of adapting to the inherent nature of things in human conduct.

Qu Boyu (a virtuous minister of the Wei state during the Spring and Autumn period) replied: One must rectify personal conduct—maintain a harmonious exterior without excessive compliance, and cultivate inner tranquility without deliberate display. Overly familiar exteriors lead to loss of principle, while excessive inner expression invites misfortune. One should accommodate others as one would an infant: when they lack rules, you follow suit; when they disregard boundaries, you do the same—only then can one reach the state of flawlessness (wu ci).

Three animal metaphors further clarify this principle: The mantis, believing its arms strong enough to stop a chariot, fails to recognize its incapacity; tiger handlers dare not feed live prey lest they provoke the beast's ferocity, instead timing its hunger and appeasing its rage; horse lovers who collect manure in fine vessels or hastily swat at biting flies end up kicked by the very steed they cherish. These examples demonstrate that forced action—even with good intentions—backfires when ignorant of a thing's true nature.

The core teaching emphasizes "attaining perfection through flawless adaptation" (da zhi ru yu wu ci). When dealing with violent individuals like the Crown Prince of Wei, this wisdom of yielding to inherent nature becomes especially vital.

匠石之齊至於曲轅見櫟社樹其大蔽牛絜 (户結/切)之百圍  圍量之也圍有小大不同有以一尺圍者  有以八尺爲仞圍者此百圍以尺論下文  三圍四圍以仞論也 其高臨山十仞而後有枝其可以爲舟者旁 十數觀者如市匠伯不顧(伯匠/石字)遂行不輟弟 子厭觀之走及匠石曰自吾執斧斤以隨夫 子未嘗見材如此其美也先生不肯視行不 輟何邪曰已矣勿言之矣散木也以爲舟則 沉以爲棺槨則速腐以扃器則速毁以爲門 户則液樠草干切  液出樠木上 以爲柱則蠹是不材之木也無所可用故能 若是之壽匠石歸櫟社見(音/現)夢曰汝將惡乎 比予哉若將比予於文木邪  中山王文木賦謂有文理 夫𣙁梨橘柚果蓏之屬實熟則剥則辱大枝 折小枝泄  小枝摘去實而木液泄 此以其能苦其生者也故不終其天年而中 道夭自掊擊於世俗者也物莫不苦是且予 求無所可用乆矣幾死(二字/句)乃今得之爲予 大用(八字/句)使予也而有用且得有此大也邪  予求無所可用之日乆矣幾爲不識者所  伐死乃今得匠石謂予不材遂得以无用  爲予之大用 且也若與予也皆物也柰何哉其相物也而 幾死之散人又惡知散木  匠石謂爲不材之木是相物也木固是物
Interpretation

This passage recounts the story of Artisan Shi (a carpenter named Shi) encountering a massive oak tree by the village shrine in Quyuan of the Qi state.

The tree was so enormous it could shade over a thousand oxen, and its trunk was so thick it would take a hundred men holding hands to encircle it (in ancient times, the unit "wei" could mean either one chi or eight chi—here it refers to the one-chi measurement). The tree reached nearly to the mountaintop, with branches only beginning to grow at eighty feet high. Among them were over a dozen limbs large enough to build boats, and the crowd of onlookers was as dense as a marketplace. Yet Artisan Shi walked past without a glance. His apprentice, however, was mesmerized and ran after his master, asking, "I’ve trained under you for years and never seen such fine timber. Why didn’t you even stop to look?"

Shi replied, "Don’t mention it—this is a 'useless tree' (sanmu, a tree unfit for lumber). If you make a boat from it, it’ll sink; a coffin, it’ll rot quickly; tools, they’ll break; a doorframe, it’ll ooze resin; a pillar, it’ll be riddled with insects. Precisely because it’s utterly useless, it’s grown this large and lived this long."

That night, Shi dreamed the oak spoke to him: "What are you comparing me to? Those 'ornamental trees' with fine-grained wood? Fruit trees like pears, oranges, and pomelos—once their fruit ripens, they’re plundered, their branches broken. Their usefulness is their undoing—they never reach their natural lifespan. I’ve long sought 'uselessness,' and though ignorant men nearly felled me several times, now that you’ve declared me useless, you’ve revealed my greatest use!"

The oak continued, "You and I are both things of nature—why judge one another? You nearly doomed me, this 'useless tree,' so how could you truly understand its way?" When Shi awoke, his apprentice asked why he was bowing to the tree’s roots. Shi replied, "This tree is beyond my judgment—it preserves itself precisely by being unfit for lumber."

(Note: The term "useless tree" (sanmu) is a key Daoist concept, representing a seemingly worthless existence that embodies profound wisdom—an idea aligned with Zhuangzi’s philosophy of "the usefulness of the useless.")

 汝亦天地間之物耳柰何其相物若分别  汝爲人木爲物則人與物既各别安能相  知汝亦幾死之散人耳又惡知幾死之散  木 匠石覺而診(占/也)其夢弟子曰趣(平/聲)取無用則 爲社何邪  彼既趍取於無用則其爲社何邪爲社是  又不能無用也 曰密若無言  匠石使弟子閉密無言似謂社樹有靈恐  知之 彼亦直寄焉以爲不知己者詬厲也  直但也彼亦但寄此身於曲轅耳以爲不  相知者强以爲社也名爲社乃詬駡厲病  之 不爲社者且幾有翦乎  翦伐也若不爲社亦無人伐之 且也彼其所保與衆異而以義譽之不亦遠 乎  凡且也者又進一歩說彼其所保全此生  者與衆人異而我欲以義理譽之不亦與  之相遠乎言前此謂其不材固不是今若  稱譽之亦不足爲彼輕重 南伯子綦  即南郭子綦居南而字伯 遊乎商之丘見大木焉有異結駟千乗隱將 芘其所藾  聚駟車千乗而隱藏其下將可芘其所藉  賴 子綦曰此何木也哉此必有異材夫仰而視 其細枝則拳曲而不可以爲棟梁俯而視其 大根則軸解(如車軸/折裂)而不可以爲棺槨咶(詩/上) 其葉則口爛而爲傷嗅之則使人狂醒二日 而不己子綦曰此果不材之木也以至於此
Interpretation

You are but one existence among heaven and earth—why cling to distinctions between self and other? If you claim humans are people while trees are mere objects, how can beings of fundamentally different natures ever truly understand each other? You're merely a mortal destined to vanish—how could you comprehend that tree destined to decay?

After the carpenter Shi awoke from his dream, his disciples questioned: "If pursuing uselessness is the goal, why become a sacred tree for village altars? Doesn't that make it useful again?" The carpenter replied with silence. He made his disciples hold their tongues, as if fearing the sacred tree might truly hear them. That tree merely dwelled temporarily in the crook of a riverbank, forcibly worshipped by ignorant people as a village shrine—a fate that ultimately harmed it. Had it not become a sacred tree, it likely would have been felled long ago.

Moreover, this tree preserved its life in extraordinary ways. To judge it by worldly standards would be to fundamentally misunderstand its nature. Earlier claims of its worthlessness were wrong, but now deliberate praise would be equally meaningless.

When Nanguo Ziqi (honored as "Bo" for dwelling in the south) traveled through Shangqiu, he encountered a marvelously huge tree—so vast it could shade a thousand chariots, its canopy sheltering multitudes. Ziqi marveled: "What tree is this? It must possess extraordinary material!" Yet looking up, he saw its twisted branches couldn't serve as beams; looking down, its split trunk couldn't make coffins. Licking its leaves blistered mouths, while its scent drove men to drunken madness for three days. Ziqi finally concluded: "This is indeed a useless tree—precisely why it's grown so immense."

其大也嗟夫(子綦/自歎)神人以此不材(以用/也) 宋有荆氏(地里/名)宜楸柏桑其拱把  兩手曰拱一手曰把 而上者求狙猴之杙以職切者斬之  所以棲狙猴者 三圍四圍求高名之麗者斬之  高名者屋之高大而有名也麗與欐同屋  棟也柳文小石城山記其上爲睥睨梁欐  之形 七圍八圍貴人富商之家求禪(去/聲)傍者斬之  司馬云棺之全一邊者 故未終其天年而中道夭於斧斤此材之患 也  此又出一段有用之爲患 故解之  漢郊祀志古天子常以春解祠言解罪求  福也 以牛之白顙者與豚之亢鼻者(額折故/鼻高)與人 有痔病者不可以適河  不可祭河神也 此皆巫祝以知之矣(以與己/通用)所以爲不祥也 此乃神人之所以爲大祥也 支離䟽者  支離形不全貌疏名 頤隱於齊  齊與隮同傴者不見其頤隱於臍間 肩高於頂  頭低而肩高於頂 會撮指天(撮徐/沽切)  臺竺緇撮之撮會合其髮而撮爲髻古者  髻近項脊曲而頭低故髻指天也 五管在上  管腧也五藏之腧皆在上 兩體爲脅  脊在髀裹故以兩髀爲脅 挫鍼治繲  衣也能挫縫衣之針 足以餬曰鼓筴播精  鼓動其䇿以占即今人抽籤者也精精米
Interpretation

This passage employs vivid analogies to reveal the Daoist wisdom of "the usefulness of the useless":

Master Ziqi of Nanguo (a Daoist figure) lamented that those who attain the Dao preserve themselves precisely through apparent uselessness. Consider the catalpa, cypress and mulberry trees thriving in the Jing region of Song state - when they grow to the thickness of two hands clasped together or one hand's grip, they're felled to make stakes for monkeys; at three to four arm spans' girth, wealthy families cut them for roof beams; at seven to eight spans, aristocrats fashion them into half-coffins. These trees all meet premature destruction due to their usefulness.

The text then illustrates through sacrificial taboos: During ancient spring sacrifices, white-foreheaded oxen, upturned-snouted pigs, and hemorrhoid-sufferers were deemed inauspicious for river deity offerings by shamans. Yet these very "ill-omened" beings were considered supremely auspicious by sages, for they thereby preserved their lives.

Finally, the deformed Shu the Disjointed is described: his chin buried in his navel, shoulders towering above his head, topknot pointing skyward, with all five viscera's pressure points facing upward, using thighs as ribs. Earning meager living through mending clothes and divination (shaking bamboo tubes to scatter ritual rice), this incomplete man avoided conscription and corvée labor while receiving government grain rations - ultimately faring better than normal-bodied people.

These examples collectively demonstrate how worldly defects and uselessness often prove key to preserving life and attaining true auspiciousness. Through this counterintuitive perspective, Daoism reveals the dialectical relationship between superficial value and essential survival wisdom.

 所以享神楚辭懷椒糈而要之注糈精米  也播者陳之以享神也言能䇿占並祀神  也 足以食(音/似)十人  所得不止於餬其口 上徵武士則支離欀臂其間  恃其無用故不自藏匿 上有大役則支離以有常疾不受功(不任/功役)上 與病者粟則受三鍾(六斛四/斗爲鍾)與十束薪夫支 離其形者猶足以養其身終其天年又況支 離其德者乎 孔子適楚楚狂接輿遊其門曰鳳子鳳予何 如德之衰也來世不可待往世不可追也天 下有道聖人成焉(成其/功)天下無道聖人生焉 (全其/生)方今之時僅免刑焉福輕乎羽莫之知 載禍重乎地莫之知避已乎己乎臨人以德 殆乎殆乎畫地而趍  行者宜任其所至若指畫所往之地而疾  趍焉則困殆矣 迷陽迷陽無傷吾行  迷陽迷蕨也蕨生蒙密能迷陽明之路故  曰迷陽托興言之 吾行卻曲卻音隙無傷吾足  以上因論語而附益之其下是莊子之言 山木自寇也膏火自煎也桂可食故伐之漆 可用故割之人皆知有用之用而莫知無用 之用也  上述櫟社樹商丘木故於此就木上
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist concept of "the usefulness of the useless," illustrating through vivid examples how seemingly worthless things can actually preserve themselves.

The text first mentions the use of refined rice (jiao xu) in sacrificial offerings to deities, enough to feed ten people. Using ritual offerings as a metaphor, it shows how seemingly useless sacrificial items actually serve great purposes.

Next comes the story of Zhili Shu, a physically deformed man: When conscription occurred, his disability exempted him from military service; when corvée labor was demanded, his chronic illness spared him from work; yet during famine relief, he received three zhong of grain and ten bundles of firewood. This demonstrates how physical deformity allowed him to live out his natural lifespan—how much more so for those with seemingly "defective virtue"?

When Confucius visited Chu, the madman Jieyu (a Chu hermit) sang: "Phoenix, phoenix! How your virtue has declined! The future cannot be awaited, the past cannot be pursued. When the world follows the Dao, sages accomplish their work; when the world lacks the Dao, sages preserve their lives. In these times, escaping punishment is fortune enough." This satirizes Confucius's activist approach to worldly affairs.

The song continues: "Blessings light as feathers go unappreciated, disasters heavy as earth go unheeded," advising against deliberate virtue cultivation, just as drawing lines on the ground to hasten people's steps only exhausts them. Mentioning the "mi yang" fern (a metaphor for resilience) and winding paths, it suggests the need for indirect approaches in life.

The conclusion states: Mountain trees are felled for their usefulness, fat is rendered for its flammability, cinnamon trees cut for edibility, lacquer trees tapped for utility. People know the uses of useful things, but not the uses of useless things. This connects with earlier discussions about oak trees and Shangqiu timber, demonstrating how seemingly worthless things endure.

Through multiple parables, this passage elucidates the Daoist wisdom of "the usefulness of the useless," advocating that in chaotic times, one should adopt seemingly worthless postures to preserve life.

結之 南華眞經循本卷之五

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0135); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 4 Vol. 6 →