中文 · EN

《南華真經新傳》Vol. 17

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 17 / 20 5,028 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經新傳》 Vol. 17 (Dongshen 洞神部, 20 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 10 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經新傳》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經新傳卷之十七積七    宋 王 元 澤 傳   讓王篇  夫帝王者道外之虚稱天下者度外之一  物至人達觀而無心於二者矣此莊子因  作讓王篇 堯以天下讓許由許由不受又讓於子州支 父子州支父曰以我爲天子猶之可也雖然 我適有幽憂之病方且治之未暇治天下也 夫天下至重也而不以害其生又況他物乎 唯無以天下爲者可以託天下也舜讓天下 於子州支伯子州支伯曰予適有幽憂之病 方且治之未暇治天下也故天下大器也而 不以易生此有道者之所以異乎俗者也舜 以天下讓善卷善卷曰余立於宇宙之中冬 日衣皮毛夏日衣葛絺春耕種形足以勞動 秋收斂身足以休食日出而作日入而息逍 遥於天地之間而心意自得吾何以天下爲 哉悲夫子之不知余也遂不受於是去而入 深山莫知其處舜以天下讓其友石户之農 石户之農曰捲捲乎后之爲人葆力之士也 以舜之德爲未至也於是夫負妻戴携子以 入於海終身不反也  夫堯舜者聖人之有爲也有爲卒至於無  爲無爲之至則神妙矣此所以皆讓天下  也故堯讓天下於子州支父而舜讓天下  於子州支伯而又讓於善卷與石户之農  數子者至人也皆能外形骸忘生死以身  爲患以寵爲辱豈以天下累心歟是以皆
Interpretation

The chapter "Abdicating Kings" uses the stories of Yao and Shun relinquishing their thrones to expound the core Daoist concept of "governing through non-action" (Wuwei).

To those who have attained the Dao, the imperial throne is but an empty title. The truly wise (zhiren, or "perfected persons") transcend worldly concerns and pay no heed to such power and status. Zhuangzi specifically composed this chapter to illustrate this principle.

Yao wished to abdicate his rule to Xu You, but Xu You refused. He then offered it to Zizhou Zhifu, who replied, "It’s not that I couldn’t serve as emperor, but I’m currently afflicted with melancholy and preoccupied with healing—how could I have time to govern the world?" Though the empire is of great importance, one must not harm life for its sake, let alone lesser external things. Only those who do not treat the empire as something to be grasped are truly fit to rule it.

Shun encountered a similar situation. When he offered the throne to Zizhou Zhibo, the latter likewise declined on the grounds of attending to his health. Though the empire is a treasure, those who follow the Dao (daozhe) never exchange it for life—this is what distinguishes them from ordinary people.

Shun then offered the throne to Shan Juan, who said, "I live between heaven and earth, wearing fur in winter and hemp in summer, plowing in spring and harvesting in autumn. I work at sunrise and rest at sunset, free and content—what use have I for the empire? I grieve that you cannot understand me!" With that, he retreated deep into the mountains, and none knew his whereabouts.

Next, Shun offered the throne to the Farmer of Stone Gate, who remarked, "This Shun—how strenuously he labors!" Considering Shun’s virtue still incomplete, the farmer took his wife and children far overseas, never to return.

Though Yao and Shun were sages, their voluntary abdication ultimately embodied the state of "non-action." When non-action reaches its utmost, it reveals the ineffable. Thus, Yao yielded to Zizhou Zhifu, and Shun yielded to Zizhou Zhibo, Shan Juan, and the Farmer of Stone Gate. These men had attained the realm of the perfected—transcending physical constraints, indifferent to life and death, regarding the body as a burden and honor as disgrace. How, then, could they allow the empire to become a burden upon their spirits?

 辭而不受也故子州支父則以天下至重  而我適有病而不能治之也子州支伯則  以天下大器而我亦有病而不能治之也  善卷則以衣皮衣葛出作入息足以逍遥  於天地之間而不能治於天下也石户之  農則以舜使我代勞苦而我亦不能治於  天下也數子者皆飾辭以拒而豈有意於  天下乎視天下如遺土壤也是以善卷則  入山而不返石户則游海而不遺所以全  逍遥之妙趣此莊子所以取之也 大王亶父居邠狄人攻之事之以皮帛而不 受事之以犬馬而不受事之以珠玉而不受 狄人之所求者土地也大王亶父曰與人之 兄居而殺其弟與人之父居而殺其子吾不 忍也子皆勉居矣爲吾臣與爲狄人臣奚以 異且吾聞之不以所用養害所養因杖筴而 去之民相連而從之遂成國於岐山之下夫 大王亶父可謂能尊生矣能尊生者雖貴富 不以養傷身雖貧賤不以利累形今世之人 居高官尊爵者皆重失之見利輕亡其身豈 不惑哉  大王之去邠所以謹於去就也夫天之生  人也均與之性同什之命豈使以外物而  傷其性命之情歟大王能知天之所付與  而不敢攻狄而决人之性命是以委國而  去之矣此大王知天之所爲也故天之所  爲者與天爲一也與天爲一則物之所以  最是以邠人相從而歸也故曰民相連而
Interpretation

Zizhou Zhifu, Zizhou Zhibo, Shan Juan, and the Farmer of Shihu all declined to govern the world with various pretexts. Zizhou Zhifu claimed his illness was too severe to take on the responsibility, while Zizhou Zhibo similarly excused himself due to poor health. Shan Juan was content with his simple life, wearing coarse hemp clothes and following the rhythms of sunrise and sunset in carefree contentment. The Farmer of Shihu considered Shun's request to govern too burdensome. In truth, these individuals were all using subtle excuses to refuse—they had no interest in worldly power, viewing the empire as no more valuable than discarded earth. Thus, Shan Juan retreated deep into the mountains, never to return, and the Farmer of Shihu wandered far overseas, all to preserve the genuine joy of unimpeded freedom. This is precisely why Zhuangzi admired them.

When King Tai of Zhou (Danfu) resided in Bin, the Di tribes repeatedly invaded. The king offered them furs, silks, hounds, horses, livestock, pearls, and jade, but the Di refused all these, for what they truly desired was land. King Tai said: "I cannot bear to see elder brothers watch their younger siblings slain, or fathers witness their sons perish. Stay here and live in peace—what difference does it make whether you are my subjects or the Di's? I have heard that one should not harm those they ought to nurture for the sake of material possessions." So he took his staff and left Bin, and the people followed him, young and old, eventually establishing a new kingdom at the foot of Mount Qi. King Tai truly understood the value of life. Those who cherish life will not harm their bodies for wealth and status, nor burden their forms with profit when impoverished. Yet today, those in high positions thoughtlessly sacrifice lives at the sight of gain—is this not utter folly?

King Tai's decision to leave Bin reflects his prudence in matters of advancement and retreat. Heaven endows all people with equal nature and destiny—how can one justify harming life's essence for external things? King Tai comprehended Heaven's intent and dared not gamble with his people's lives by fighting the Di. Thus, he chose to relinquish his kingdom and depart. This was his way of aligning with the Dao of Heaven. Those who unite with the Dao find all things turning to them—hence the people of Bin followed him without hesitation, supporting their elders and carrying their young.

 從之遂成國於岐山之下 越人三世弑其君王子搜患之逃乎丹穴而 越國無君求王子搜不得從之丹穴王子搜 不肯出越人薰之以艾乗以玉輿王子搜授 緩登車仰天而呼曰君乎君乎獨不可以舍 我乎王子搜非惡爲君也惡爲君之患也若 王子搜者可謂不以國傷生矣此固越人之 所欲得爲君也韓魏相與爭侵地子華子見 昭僖侯昭僖侯有憂色子華子曰今使天下 書銘於君之前書之言曰左手攫之則右手 廢右手攫之則左手廢然而攫之者必有天 下君能攫之乎昭僖侯曰寡人不攫也子華 子曰甚善自是觀之兩臂重於天下也身亦 重於兩臂韓之輕於天下亦遠矣今之所爭 者其輕於韓又遠君固愁身傷生以憂戚不 得也僖侯曰善哉教寡人者衆矣未嘗得聞 此言也子華子可謂知輕重矣  夫國土者虚器也蔽者不知而傷生以爭  之此越之所以三世而弑君也惟達者知  之而無心於君國此王子捜所以逃於丹  穴而全生也然王子捜雖逃而越人固立  以爲君所謂迫而後起也迫而後起則非  得已此搜所以仰天而呼歎也若王子捜  者亦可謂之至人矣 魯君聞顔闔得道之人也使人以幣先焉顔 闔守陋閭苴布之衣而自飯牛魯君之使者 至顔闔自對之使者曰此顔闔之家與顔闔
Interpretation

In the state of Yue, three successive generations witnessed regicide. Prince Sou, fearing disaster would befall him, fled to the legendary hermitage of Danxue Mountain. When the Yue people could not find their ruler, they eventually discovered the prince in this mountain retreat. Unwilling to leave, Prince Sou was forced out by the Yue people who smoked him out with mugwort fumes and welcomed him with a jade-adorned royal carriage. Clutching the carriage ropes as he slowly ascended, he gazed skyward and cried: "O throne! O throne! Why must you not leave me be?" It wasn't that he despised rulership, but rather feared the calamities it brought. Such a man as Prince Sou truly understood how power should never harm one's life—precisely why the Yue people sought him as their wise sovereign.

Later, when the states of Han and Wei disputed border territories, the Daoist thinker Zihua Zi visited Marquis Zhaoxi of Han and noticed his troubled countenance. Zihua Zi posed: "If a tablet were placed before you inscribed 'Seize with your left hand and lose your right; seize with your right and lose your left—yet the taker gains all under heaven,' would you grasp it?" The Marquis replied, "I would not." "Excellent!" said Zihua Zi. "Thus we see arms are dearer than the empire, and one's body dearer still. Han is insignificant compared to the world, and those disputed lands are trivial compared to Han. Yet you torment your spirit over this—truly unworthy." The Marquis sighed: "Many have advised me, but none with such wisdom." Here, Zihua Zi demonstrated true understanding of life's priorities.

Territories are but illusory externalities. Fools, ignorant of this truth, maim their lives in their pursuit—this was the root of Yue's three regicides. Only the enlightened recognize that rulership and states warrant no covetous attachment. Thus Prince Sou preserved his life in Danxue's seclusion. Though compelled to assume the throne eventually, his celestial lament revealed it was mere circumstance—such a man may be called a perfected Daoist sage.

When the Duke of Lu heard the recluse Yan He had attained the Dao, he sent envoys with gifts to summon him. Yan He dwelled in a dilapidated alley, clad in coarse cloth while tending oxen. "Is this Yan He's home?" asked the envoy. "It is," came the direct reply. This episode epitomizes the genuine Daoist cultivator's indifference to fame and wealth.

對曰此闔之家也使者致幣顔闔對曰恐聽 者謬而遺使者罪不若審之使者還反審之 復來求之則不得已故若顔闔者眞惡富貴 也  顔闔者可謂通達而無疵者也處貧賤不  以爲惡視富貴不以爲好當魯君之致幣  則囂然不顧而誑使者以其謬誤矣豈以  物之儻來而爲悦乎此莊子之所以取之  也故曰若顔闔者眞惡富貴也 故曰道之眞以治身其緒餘以爲國家其土 苴以治天下由此觀之帝王之功聖人之餘 事也非所以完身養生也  道之眞以治身者以身爲入道之本也身  入於道則推其餘可以爲國家崇其末可  以治天下故曰其緒餘以爲國家其土直  以治天下然爲國家治天下者必成功功  非爲道之眞也故曰帝王之功聖人之餘  事也故功者興事造業之謂也興事造業  則役形而用神故曰非所以完身養生也 今世俗之君子多危身棄生以殉物豈不悲 哉凡聖人之動作也必察其所以之與其所 以爲今且有人於此以隨侯之珠彈千仞之 雀世必笑之是何也則其所用者重而所要 者輕也夫生者豈特隨侯之重哉子列子窮 容貌有饑色客有言之於鄭子陽者曰列禦 寇蓋有道之士居君之國而窮君無乃爲不 好士乎鄭子陽即令官遺之粟子列子見使 者再拜而辭使者去子列子入其妻望之而
Interpretation

This passage recounts the stories of Yan He and Liezi, illustrating the Daoist attitude toward wealth and the preservation of life.

When Yan He was presented with lavish gifts from the ruler of Lu, he deliberately pretended to have misheard and asked the messenger to return and confirm the offer. Only when the messenger came again did he reluctantly accept. This shows that Yan He was truly averse to wealth and high status. He remained unperturbed by poverty and unmoved by riches—when the ruler of Lu sent him gifts, he paid them no mind and even used the excuse of mishearing to decline. Zhuangzi praises this attitude of not rejoicing over unexpected gains.

The text explains that the true essence of the Dao (the Way) is for cultivating one’s body and mind. What remains may be used to govern a state, and the least refined aspects may be applied to ruling the world. Thus, the achievements of emperors and kings are merely byproducts of the sage’s work, not the foundation for preserving life and nurturing one’s nature. Nowadays, worldly gentlemen often harm their bodies and abandon their lives in pursuit of external things—a truly lamentable state.

An analogy follows: If someone were to use a priceless pearl like the Marquis of Sui’s jewel to shoot down a sparrow high in a tree, the world would surely laugh at them, for the means are too precious and the goal too trivial. Isn’t life itself far more valuable than the Marquis of Sui’s pearl?

Finally, the story of Liezi is told: Living in poverty, Liezi was offered grain by Ziyang, the prime minister of Zheng, who sent a messenger to deliver it. Liezi repeatedly bowed in gratitude but firmly declined. His wife could not understand, but Liezi explained that Ziyang had sent the grain because someone had praised him as a worthy man—but he might just as easily punish him later if slandered. Eventually, Ziyang was executed, and Liezi avoided implication precisely because he had refused the gift. This demonstrates that sages always consider motives and consequences in their actions.

拊心曰妾聞爲有道者之妻子皆得佚樂今 有飢色君過而遺先生食先生不受豈不命 邪子列子笑謂之曰君非自知我也以人之 言而遺我粟至其罪我也又且以人之言此 吾所以不受也其卒民果作難而殺子陽楚 昭王失國屠羊說走而從於昭王昭王反國 將賞從者及屠羊說屠羊說曰大王失國說 失屠羊大王反國說亦反屠羊臣之爵禄已 復矣又何賞之有王曰强之屠羊說曰大王 失國非臣之罪故不敢伏其誅大王反國非 臣之功故不敢當其賞王曰見之屠羊說曰 楚國之法必有重賞大功而後得見今臣之 知不足以存國而勇不足以死寇吴軍入郢 說畏難而避寇非故隨大王也今大王欲廢 法毁約而見說此非臣之所以聞天下也王 謂司馬子綦曰屠羊說居處卑賤而陳義甚 高子綦爲我延之以三旌之位屠羊說曰夫 三旌之位吾知其貴於屠羊之肆也萬鍾之 禄吾知其富於屠羊之利也然豈可以貪爵 禄而使吾君有妄施之名乎說不敢當願復 反吾屠羊之肆遂不受也  夫生者性命之本也物者養生之具也生  爲重物爲輕達者全其所重而忘所輕其  生所以生生也世俗忘其所重而殉所輕  其生所以不存也此莊子所以有隨珠彈  雀之喻矣 原憲居魯環堵之室茨以生草蓬户不完桑
Interpretation

The New Commentary on the Southern Florescence Scripture presents the Daoist concept of "valuing life over material things" through two illustrative stories.

The first story features Liezi, a prominent Daoist figure, refusing a charitable offer. When a well-meaning man, noticing Liezi's gaunt appearance, offered him food, Liezi declined with a smile: "You don't truly understand me—you're offering this because others said I deserve help. Had they said I deserved punishment, you'd equally comply." Later, when political turmoil erupted, this very benefactor was executed by Ziyang. This episode reveals how external generosity often comes with implicit conditions, making spiritual independence preferable.

The second narrative concerns Butcher Yang of Chu, a humble sheep slaughterer. After King Zhao of Chu regained his throne and sought to reward his loyal followers, Butcher Yang declined: "Your Majesty's exile wasn't my fault, nor was the restoration my achievement. Chu's laws mandate rewards only for great merit. I possess neither the talent to save the state nor the courage to die for it—I merely fled misfortune alongside you. Accepting undeserved honors would tarnish your reputation for just governance." When Minister Ziqi offered him high office and wealth, Butcher Yang responded: "Though three noble ranks surpass butchering sheep, and ample stipends outearn slaughtering wages, I'd rather return to my knives than let my ruler be accused of indiscriminate patronage."

The commentary crystallizes the Daoist perspective: Life is fundamental, while material things merely serve its nourishment. The enlightened prioritize life's essence over external possessions, whereas worldly people lose life's core chasing ephemera. Zhuangzi's metaphor of "using the Marquis of Sui's pearl to shoot sparrows" condemns such inversion of priorities—no treasure, however precious, justifies actions that harm life's vitality. Like squandering priceless jewels as slingshot ammunition, misplacing life's true value constitutes fundamental folly.

以爲樞而甕牖二室褐以爲塞上漏下濕匡 坐而弦子貢乗大馬中紺而表素軒車不容 巷往見原憲原憲華冠縰履杖藜而應門子 貢曰嘻先生何病原憲應之曰憲聞之無財 謂之貧學而不能行謂之病今憲貧也非病 也子貢逡巡而有愧色原憲笑曰夫希世而 行比周而友學以爲人教以爲己仁義之慝 輿馬之飾憲不忍爲也曾子居衛緼袍無表 顔色腫噲手足胼胝三日不舉火十年不製 衣正冠而纓絶捉衿而肘見納履而踵决曳 縰而歌商頌聲滿天地若出金石天子不得 臣諸侯不得友故飬志者忘形養形者忘利 致道者忘心矣  夫富與貴是人之所好也貧與賤是人之  所惡也所好所惡皆生於有心惟能無心  則好惡所以忘好惡忘則處富貴不知其  富貴居貧賤不知其貧賤汎然自得於胸  中所以逍遥於天地之間也若原憲曾子  者可謂無心矣憲居環堵之室蓬户而甕  牖曾子顔色腫噲而衣寇皆决壞二人未  嘗惡貧而忘道故或弦而歌而忘形自得  矣豈務殉物而傷生歟此所以異於世俗  矣故曰致道者忘心 孔子謂顔回曰回來家貧居卑胡不仕乎顔 回對曰不願仕回有郭外之田五十畝足以 給飦粥郭内之田十畝足以爲絲麻鼓琴足 以自娱所學夫子道者是以自樂也回不願 仕孔子愀然變容曰善哉回之意丘聞之知
Interpretation

This passage vividly illustrates the Daoist spiritual realm of finding contentment in poverty through several poignant stories.

Yuan Xian lived in a dilapidated house with broken jars for windows, a leaky roof, and damp floors. When the elegantly dressed Zigong arrived in his carriage to visit, he exclaimed: "How has the master fallen into such dire straits?" Yuan Xian replied: "Lacking wealth is called poverty, but learning the Dao (the Way) without practicing it is called sickness. I am poor, not sick." He then criticized those who conform to worldly trends, form cliques for personal gain, and use scholarship as social ornamentation, declaring he would rather remain pure in poverty than compromise his principles.

When Zengzi lived in the State of Wei, he wore tattered padded robes with a swollen face and calloused hands and feet. His cooking fire often went out, and he wore the same clothes for ten years. His hat strings snapped, his sleeves were torn to the elbows, and his shoes were worn through at the heels. Yet he would shuffle along in these broken shoes singing the "Hymns of Shang" (Shang Song, from the Book of Songs) with a voice so resonant it filled heaven and earth like the clear tones of metal and stone. Emperors couldn't compel him to serve, nor could feudal lords befriend him, for he had attained the state where "those who cultivate aspiration forget form; those who cultivate form forget gain; those who attain the Dao forget worldly concerns."

The text observes that while wealth and honor are universally desired, and poverty and low status universally disliked, these preferences stem from "having worldly concerns" (youxin). Only by reaching the state of "no-mind" (wuxin) can one transcend such attachments—remaining unaffected whether in wealth or poverty, finding inner freedom. Like Yuan Xian and Zengzi, who lived in crumbling homes wearing rags yet never resented their poverty nor neglected their spiritual practice, instead finding joy in playing instruments and singing—this marks the fundamental difference from worldly people.

Yan Hui's story further confirms this. When Confucius asked why he didn't seek office, Yan Hui replied that his fifty acres outside the city provided enough gruel, his ten acres inside provided adequate clothing, and playing the zither while studying the master's teachings brought him complete happiness. Confucius was deeply moved, praising Yan Hui's contented heart. These stories collectively demonstrate how true Dao practitioners transcend material conditions to achieve spiritual liberation.

(Notes: "Jar windows" refers to using broken jars as windowpanes; "shuffling in shoes" describes walking with worn footwear; "Hymns of Shang" are sections from the Book of Songs; "those who attain the Dao forget worldly concerns" describes how Dao seekers transcend mundane attachments.)

足者不以利自累也審自得者失之而不懼 行修於内者無位而不怍丘誦之乆矣今於 回而後見之是丘之得也中山公子牟謂瞻 子曰身在江海之上心居乎魏闕之下柰何 瞻子曰重生重生則利輕中山公子牟曰雖 知之未能勝也瞻子曰不能自勝則從神無 惡乎不能自勝而强不從者此之謂重傷重 傷之人無壽類矣魏牟萬乗之公子也其隱 巖穴也難爲於布衣之士雖未至乎道可謂 有其意矣  夫外冥其極者内所以自足自足則所以  不憂矣顔回者可謂能冥其極也有六十  畝之田不願仕所以鼓琴而自娱也夫不  仕者自足也自娱者不憂也不憂所以爲  至樂至樂全則自得而已矣是以孔子稱  之而以爲是丘之得也是丘之得者聖人  之所以深得也 孔子窮於陳蔡之間七日不火食藜羹不糝 顔色甚憊而弦歌於室顔回擇菜子路子貢 相與言曰夫子再逐於魯削迹於衛伐樹於 宋窮於商周圍於陳蔡殺夫子者無罪藉夫 子者無禁弦歌鼓琴未嘗絶音君子之無恥 也若此乎顔回無以應入告孔子孔子推琴 喟然而歎曰由與賜細人也召而來吾語之 子路子貢入子路曰如此者可謂窮矣孔子 曰是何言也君子通於道之謂通窮於道之 謂窮今丘抱仁義之道以遭亂世之患其何 窮之爲故内省而不窮於道臨難而不失其
Interpretation

This passage presents several stories and perspectives on the Daoist attitude toward life.

The first section explains that those who truly understand contentment are not burdened by material gains, and those with inner fulfillment remain unafraid even when losing external possessions. Confucius studied this principle for a long time and later recognized its embodiment in his disciple Yan Hui, considering this realization his greatest attainment.

Next comes the dialogue between Zhongshan Gongzi Mou (a nobleman of Wei during the Warring States period) and the Daoist figure Zhanzi. Though Gongzi Mou lived as a recluse in the mountains, his mind remained attached to courtly power. Zhanzi advised him: "Those who value life naturally regard material benefits lightly." Gongzi Mou admitted understanding this truth yet being unable to practice it. Zhanzi responded: "If one cannot control desires, it's better to follow their natural course. Forcibly suppressing them causes double harm, making longevity difficult." While Gongzi Mou, as an aristocrat, couldn't fully attain the Daoist ideal, he already possessed the right intention.

The text then cites the example of Yan Hui (Confucius's disciple), who found contentment farming sixty acres of land, declining official positions and finding joy in playing the zither. This state of simple contentment represents the highest realm praised in Daoism, earning Confucius's particular admiration.

Finally, the passage describes Confucius's experience when trapped between Chen and Cai states. Despite seven days without cooked food, surviving only on wild vegetable soup, he continued playing his zither and singing. His disciples Zilu and Zigong couldn't comprehend their master's cheerfulness amid hardship. Confucius explained: "The noble person judges circumstances by whether they understand the Dao, not by external wealth or poverty. Though I uphold the way of benevolence and righteousness amidst chaotic times and hardships, my mind remains unshackled, and I never lose my virtue when facing danger. This constitutes true enlightenment."

德天寒旣至霜雪旣降吾是以知松栢之茂 也陳蔡之隘於丘其幸乎孔子削然反琴而 弦歌子路扢然執干而舞子貢曰吾不知天 之高也地之下也古之得道者窮亦樂通亦 樂所樂非窮通也道德於此則窮通爲寒暑 風雨之序矣故許由娱於潁陽而共伯得乎 丘首舜以天下讓其友北人無擇北人無擇 曰異哉后之爲人也居於𤱶畝之中而遊堯 之門不若是而己又欲以其辱行漫我吾羞 見之因自投清泠之淵  聖人能全其天樂也天樂全則萬物不足  以憂之此孔子窮於陳蔡而弦歌不息也  子路子貢者不知聖人樂天知命而不憂  以爲君子之無恥此孔子不得不語之以  窮通之理也夫窮者非窮於道也通者非  達於時也以不能知道則謂之窮能通於  道則謂之通聖人於道不窮而曲通所不  遇者時而已豈若細人而自窮於道乎此  聖人自得如此而不改其樂也樂不改則  利害榮辱不能汩于中任其所變而已矣  此子貢遽悟而所以有古之得道者窮亦  樂通亦樂之言又曰道德於此則窮通爲  寒暑風雨之序矣 湯將伐桀因卞隨而謀卞隨曰非吾事也湯 曰孰可曰吾不知也湯又因瞀光而謀瞀光 曰非吾事也湯曰孰可曰吾不知也湯曰伊 尹何如曰强力忍垢吾不知其他也湯遂與 伊尹謀伐桀剋之以讓卞隨卞隨辭曰后之
Interpretation

When the bitter cold arrives and frost and snow swirl in the air, I finally understand why pine and cypress remain evergreen. Confucius, trapped between the borders of Chen and Cai, was in fact fortunate—there he was, lightly strumming his zither and continuing to sing, while Zilu danced with a shield in hand. Zigong sighed and said, "Now I understand. The ancient ones who attained the Dao (the Way) could remain joyful whether in hardship or prosperity, because their true happiness did not depend on external circumstances. When one’s inner self is united with the Dao, hardship and prosperity become as natural as the turning of the seasons."

Xu You found contentment north of the Ying River, and Gong Bo was at ease on Mount Shouyang. When Shun sought to abdicate the throne to his friend Beiren Wuze, the latter replied, "How strange Shun is! A mere farmer who accepted Yao’s abdication, and now he wishes to taint me with this disgraceful act." With that, he plunged into the cold, clear depths and drowned himself.

The sages fully comprehend "heavenly joy" (the supreme happiness of union with the Dao). Once attained, nothing in the world can disturb it. This is why Confucius could still play his zither and sing while trapped between Chen and Cai. At first, Zilu and Zigong failed to grasp the sage’s state of "joy in heaven and understanding of fate," mistakenly believing their teacher to be shameless. It was only then that Confucius explained to them the true meaning of hardship and prosperity—so-called hardship is not a lack in the study of the Dao, nor is prosperity mere worldly success. To fail in comprehending the Dao is true hardship; to penetrate the great Dao is true prosperity. The sage is never truly "trapped" in the Dao—they merely await the right moment, never barred from the Dao like ordinary people. It is precisely because sages possess this realization that they remain perpetually joyful, undisturbed by gain or loss, honor or disgrace.

Later, when King Tang sought to overthrow the tyrant Jie of Xia, he consulted Bian Sui and Mao Guang in turn. Both replied, "This is not our affair." When Tang asked who could undertake the task, they said, "We do not know." When Tang mentioned Yi Yin, Bian Sui merely remarked, "He can endure humiliation—beyond that, I know nothing." After Tang and Yi Yin succeeded in overthrowing Jie, Tang wished to abdicate the throne to Bian Sui, who firmly declined, saying... (The text abruptly ends here, with the implication that Bian Sui refused the offer of rulership.)

伐桀也謀乎我必以我爲賊也勝桀而讓我 必以我爲貪也吾生乎亂世而無道之人再 來漫我以其辱行吾不忍數聞也乃自投椆 水而死湯又讓瞀光曰知者謀之武者遂之 仁者居之古之道也吾子胡不立乎瞀光辭 曰廢上非義也殺民非仁也人犯其難我享 其利非廉也吾聞之曰非其義者不受其禄 無道之世不踐其土況尊我乎吾不忍乆見 也乃負石而自沈於廬水昔周之興有士二 人處於孤竹曰伯夷叔齊二人相謂曰吾聞 西方有人似有道者試往觀焉至於岐陽武 王聞之使叔旦往見之與之盟曰加富二等 就官一列血性而理之二人相視而笑曰嘻 異哉此非吾所謂道也昔者神農之有天下 也時祀盡敬而不祈喜其於人也忠信盡治 而無求焉樂與政爲政樂與治爲治不以人 之壞自成也不以人之卑自高也不以遭時 自利也今周見殷之亂而遽爲政上謀而下 行貨阻兵而保威割性而盟以爲信揚行以 說衆殺伐以要利是推亂以易暴也吾聞古 之士遭治世不避其任遇亂世不爲苟存今 天下闇周德衰其並乎周以塗吾身也不如 避之以潔吾行二子北至於首陽之山遂餓 而死焉若伯夷叔齊者其於富貴也苟可得 已則必不賴高節戾行獨樂其志不事於世 此二士之節也  夫湯放桀武王伐紂所以應天而順人也
Interpretation

When King Tang of Shang was preparing to attack the tyrant Jie of Xia, someone suggested that I participate in the planning. But doing so would make others see me as a traitor. If, after defeating Jie, Tang were to offer me the throne, people would accuse me of coveting power. Born in an age of chaos, I have repeatedly endured the slander and insults of those without virtue (De). Unable to bear such defamation any longer, I threw myself into the Tong River and drowned.

Later, King Tang sought to abdicate in favor of the virtuous recluse Wu Guang (an ancient hermit), saying, "The wise devise strategies, the brave carry them out, and the benevolent occupy the throne—this has been the way since ancient times. Why do you refuse?" Wu Guang declined, replying, "To depose a ruler is contrary to the Dao (the Way), to kill the people is not benevolence, and for me to reap the rewards while others take the risks is not integrity. I have heard that wealth gained unjustly should not be accepted, and lands ruled without virtue should not be trodden upon—let alone for me to assume high office. I cannot bear to remain here any longer." With that, he tied a stone to his back and drowned himself in the Lu River.

During the rise of the Zhou dynasty, there were two virtuous men in the state of Guzhu—Bo Yi and Shu Qi. They discussed among themselves, "We have heard that in the west, there is someone who seems to have attained the Dao. Let us go and see." When they arrived at Qiyang, King Wu of Zhou, upon hearing of their arrival, sent his brother, the Duke of Zhou, to make a covenant with them: they would be granted two ranks of nobility and appointed to first-class official positions, sealed with a blood oath over a sacrificial animal. The two men exchanged glances and laughed, saying, "How strange! This is not the Dao we seek. In ancient times, when the Divine Farmer (Shennong) ruled the world, he performed seasonal sacrifices to express reverence but did not pray for blessings. He treated the people with loyalty and trust, yet sought nothing in return. He governed in accordance with the people's will, never elevating himself by others' failures, never growing arrogant at others' humility, and never exploiting circumstances for personal gain. But now, the Zhou dynasty, seeing the chaos in Shang, hastens to seize power—those above scheme while those below act. They bribe with wealth, intimidate with force, swear false oaths under the pretense of sincerity, and flaunt their virtue to please the masses, all while profiting through slaughter. This is replacing tyranny with violence!"

Bo Yi and Shu Qi continued, "We have heard that the sages of old did not shirk responsibility in times of order, nor did they cling to life in times of chaos. Now the world is dark, and the virtue of Zhou has decayed. Rather than defile ourselves by joining them, it is better to withdraw and preserve our purity." So they traveled north to Shouyang Mountain, where they eventually starved to death. Men like Bo Yi and Shu Qi would never rely on the chance for wealth and honor, even if it were offered. They held fast to their noble principles, standing apart from the world and finding joy in fulfilling their aspirations. They took no part in worldly affairs—such was the integrity of these two sages.

As for King Tang exiling Jie of Xia or King Wu of Zhou overthrowing King Zhou of Shang, these acts may appear to align with the Mandate of Heaven and the will of the people. Yet true worthies would rather die upholding their principles than compromise their virtue (De) to conform to the times.

 應天者可謂知於天順人者可謂知於人  能知天人之所爲則此湯武之所以聖也  故瞀光卞隨伯夷叔齊者不知湯武之所  爲而共非之又不忍聞其事而自投於洪  流餓死於首陽可謂不該不徧之士也夫  賊仁者謂之賊賊義者謂之殘仁義者道  德之著而殘賊之則大道所以愈廢也大  道廢則天下性命之情不正矣此湯武所  以必伐而反性命之正也數子者不達於  妙理而徒蔽於分寸豈得謂之該徧之士  矣夫莊子之作此篇所以叙至人之所爲  而明無心之妙道其爲言各有其序矣夫  中天下而帝者人之所樂也故首言堯舜  不以天下爲意而相讓君一國亦人之所  樂也次言大王子搜不以邠越累心而逃  去貧賤者人之所惡也故言顔闔列子原  憲曾子顔回不以貧賤爲意而務去及其  終則言孔子之窮於陳蔡湯武之除於桀  紂所以明無心之道也夫孔子之在陳蔡  豈有心於憂患乎故弦歌不絶而自適也  湯武之除桀紂豈有心於得天下乎故去  其殘賊而反正也莊子能知古人之意而
Interpretation

Those who conform to the Heavenly Dao (the Way) may be called true knowers of celestial principles, while those who follow the people's will may be considered understanders of human nature. The ability to comprehend the patterns of Heaven's decree and human affairs is precisely what made rulers like Tang of Shang and Wu of Zhou become sages.

Figures like Muguang, Bian Sui, Bo Yi and Shu Qi failed to understand the actions of Tang and Wu, instead collectively criticizing them. Unable to bear hearing accounts of dynastic transitions, they ultimately chose death—some by drowning, others by starving on Shouyang Mountain. These men can only be regarded as narrow-minded and incomplete scholars. Those who harm benevolence (Ren) are called "thieves," while those who damage righteousness (Yi) are termed "mutilators." Benevolence and righteousness are concrete manifestations of Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue). When these are mutilated, the Great Dao declines further. Once the Dao declines, humanity's original nature deviates from its proper course. This explains why Tang and Wu had to overthrow tyrants to restore humanity's innate goodness. The aforementioned recluses couldn't comprehend the subtle principles of Heaven, clinging stubbornly to minor details—how could they be considered truly comprehensive scholars?

Zhuangzi composed this passage to illustrate the conduct of the Perfected Person (Zhiren, one who has attained the Dao) and elucidate the profound principle of "non-intentional action" (Wuwei). His argument follows an intrinsic logic: First, he describes how Yao and Shun relinquished rulership without attachment; then recounts how Taibo and Prince Sou escaped the constraints of Bin-Yue's throne; next presents worthy men like Yan He, Liezi, Yuan Xian, Zengzi and Yan Hui who cultivated themselves undisturbed by poverty. Finally, he discusses Confucius' hardship in Chen-Cai and Tang-Wu's overthrow of tyrants—all to reveal the mystery of "non-intentional action."

When Confucius was trapped between Chen and Cai, did he deliberately worry? He still played his zither and sang, maintaining inner peace. When Tang and Wu overthrew tyrants, did they intentionally seek empire? They simply removed cruelty to restore the proper Dao. Zhuangzi grasped the ancients' true meaning, using such narratives to dispel the world's deluded customs.

(Note: The term "non-intentional action" (Wuwei) is a key Daoist concept denoting spontaneous, unforced action; "Perfected Person" (Zhiren) refers to one who has reached the highest state of Dao cultivation; "Bin-Yue" refers to an ancient minor state)

 言之所以覺天下之蔽俗也 南華眞經新傳卷之十七

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0136); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 16 Vol. 18 →