中文 · EN

《南華真經註疏》Vol. 1

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 1 / 35 12,935 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經註疏》 Vol. 1 (Dongshen 洞神部, 35 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 25 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經註疏》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

南華眞經注䟽卷之一     河南郭象注     唐西華法師成玄英䟽    内篇逍遥遊第一(注夫小大雖殊而/放於自得之場則)    (物任其性事稱其能各當其分/逍遥一也豈容勝負於其間哉) 北冥有魚其名爲鯤鯤之大不知其幾千里 也  䟽溟猶海也取其溟漠無涯故爲之溟東  方朔十洲記云溟海無風而洪波百丈巨  海之内有此大魚欲明物性自然故標爲  章首玄中記云東方有大魚焉行者一日  過魚頭七日過魚尾産三日碧海爲之變  紅故知大物生於大處豈獨北溟而已 化而爲鳥其名爲鵬  注鵬鯤之實吾所未詳也夫莊子之大意  在乎逍遥遊放無爲而自得故極小大之  致以明性分之適達觀之士宜要其會歸  而遺其所寄不足事事曲與生說自不害  其弘㫖皆可略之  䟽夫四序風馳三光電卷是以負山嶽而  捨故揭舟壑以趨新故化魚爲鳥欲明變  化之大理也 鵬之背不知其幾千里也怒而飛其翼若垂 天之雲  䟽魚論其大以表頭尾難知鳥言其背亦  示脩短叵測故下文云未有知其脩者也  鼓怒翅翼奮迅毛衣既欲摶風方將擊水  遂乃斷絶雲氣背負青天騫翥翶翔凌摩  雷漢乗陰布影若天涯之降行雲也 是鳥也海運則將徙於南冥南冥者天池也  注非溟海不足以運其身非九萬里不足
Interpretation

The Commentary and Subcommentary on the True Scripture of Southern Florescence, Volume One

Commentary by Guo Xiang of Henan; subcommentary by the Tang dynasty Master of the Western Florescence, Cheng Xuanying.

Inner Chapter: “Free and Easy Wandering,” Part One

Guo Xiang’s commentary: The small and the great may differ, but as long as each rests content in the realm suited to it, then…

Cheng Xuanying’s subcommentary: All things follow their own natures, and each task accords with the abilities suited to it. When each is content with its own place, all are free and easy. How could one rank them as higher or lower, or as winners or losers?

In the northern sea there is a fish called Kun. No one knows how many thousand li its body measures.

Cheng Xuanying’s subcommentary: “Ming” means the sea. Because its waters are deep, vast, and without bounds, it is called the “Ming.” Dongfang Shuo’s Record of the Ten Isles says that no wind blows over the Ming Sea, yet it can raise enormous waves a hundred zhang high; such a great fish lives in the sea. The chapter begins with a great fish to show that each thing’s nature is simply what it is by nature. The Record of the Mysterious Within says that in the east there is a great fish whose head takes a traveler a whole day to cross and whose tail takes seven days. Three days after it was born, the azure sea turned red. From this we can see that great beings are born in vast places. Why should they exist only in the northern sea?

The Kun transforms into a bird called Peng.

Guo Xiang’s commentary: I do not know what the Peng and Kun look like. The purport of the Zhuangzi lies in freedom and ease, and in following Wuwei (non-action) to find contentment. It therefore carries the difference between the great and the small to its utmost, showing that each thing has its own proper place. Those who understand should grasp its purport. They need not cling to the particular images used to convey its meaning, nor investigate every detail literally and invent explanations for it. Doing so does not hinder understanding its grand intent.

Cheng Xuanying’s subcommentary: The seasons change as swiftly as gusting winds, while the sun, moon, and stars race across the sky. Thus all things cast off their old forms, bearing mountains on their backs, and leap through deep valleys toward new forms. The Kun’s transformation into the Peng illustrates the vast principle of transformation.

The Peng’s back is so large that no one knows how many thousand li it measures. When it rises into flight, its wings seem like clouds covering the sky.

Cheng Xuanying’s subcommentary: The fish is described through its immense size to show that its head and tail cannot be measured. The bird is described by its back for the same reason: its length cannot be determined. That is why the text later says no one knows how long it is. It raises its wings and drives them powerfully, preparing to rise with the wind and then beat the surface of the water. Afterward it pierces the clouds, bears the blue sky on its back, and soars high into the heavens. Its shadow spreads beneath it as it flies; from below, it looks like a flowing cloud descending from the edge of the sky.

Whenever the sea wind rises and the air currents move, this bird sets off for the southern sea. The southern sea is the Celestial Pool.

Guo Xiang’s commentary: Without a great sea, there would not be enough room to support its body; without ninety thousand li of open sky, there would not be enough…

 以負其翼此豈好竒哉直以大物必自生  於大處大處亦必自生此大物理固自然  不患其失又何措心於其間哉  䟽運轉也是指斥也即此鵬鳥其形重大  若不海中運轉無以自致高昇皆不得不  然非樂然也且形既遷革情亦隨變昔日  爲魚涵泳北海今時作鳥騰翥南溟雖復  昇沉性殊逍遥一也亦猶死生聚散所遇  斯適千變萬化未始非吾所以化魚爲鳥  自北徂南者鳥是凌虚之物南即啓明之  方魚乃滯溺之蟲北有幽冥之地欲表向  明背闇捨滯求進故舉南北鳥魚以示爲  道之逕耳而大海洪川原夫造化非人所  作故曰天池也 齊諧者志怪者也諧之言曰鵬之徙於南冥 也水擊三千里摶扶揺而上者九萬里  注夫翼大則難舉故摶扶摇而後能上九  萬里乃足自勝耳既有斯翼豈得决然而  起數仞而下哉此皆不得不然非樂然也 去以六月息者也  注夫大鳥一去半歲至天池而息小鳥一  飛半朝槍榆枋而止此比所能則有間矣  其於適性一也  䟽姓齊名諧人姓名也亦言書名也齊國  有此悱諧之書也誌記也擊打也摶鬥也  扶摇旋風也齊諧所著之書多記怪異之  事莊生引以爲證明己所說不虚大鵬既  將適南溟不可决然而起所以舉擊兩翅  動蕩三千踉蹌而行方能離水然後繚戾
Interpretation

Its wings bear the weight of its body. Does this mean it delights in the extraordinary? It is simply that, being so large, it must rely on its own natural endowments to take flight. Great beings arise in great places, and great places naturally give rise to great beings. This is the nature of things; it is how they have always been. It does not worry about losing anything, so why should it trouble itself over this?

The commentary says: This passage also describes the great Peng’s movements, using them to illustrate a principle. The Peng is heavy. Unless it gathers strength in the sea and uses the water to set itself in motion, it cannot rise into the sky. It has no choice; it does not do this because it likes to. Once its form has changed, its condition changes with it: before, it was a fish swimming in the Northern Sea; now, transformed into a bird, it flies above the Southern Sea. Though one sinks and the other rises, and their natures differ, each follows its own circumstances and is at ease. It is like life and death, coming together and parting: whatever condition one encounters, one adapts to it peacefully. Amid countless transformations, every one is a way of changing in accordance with one’s own nature. The fish becoming a bird and flying from north to south is just such a transformation.

The bird is a creature that flies through the open sky, while the south is the direction of the rising brightness, a symbol of light. The fish is a creature that sinks beneath the water, while the north is associated with the land of darkness. By invoking the south and north, the bird and the fish, the passage expresses turning toward light and away from darkness, leaving stagnation behind and seeking progress. In this way, it describes a path leading to the Dao. The sea and the great river both arise through the transformations of nature; neither is made by human hands. That is why they are called the “Heavenly Pool,” a vast body of water formed naturally.

The Qixie (a book recording strange tales) says: “When the great Peng migrates to the Southern Sea, it beats the water, raising waves three thousand li high. It rides a whirlwind, spiraling upward, and flies to a height of ninety thousand li.”

The commentary says: The larger the wings, the harder they are to lift. That is why the great Peng must ride a whirlwind, spiraling upward until it reaches a height of ninety thousand li—high enough to support its own weight. With wings so immense, how could it suddenly take flight, rise only a few feet, and stop? It has no choice; it does not do this because it likes to. The great Peng must wait for the great wind of the sixth month before it can set out.

The commentary says: Once the great bird takes flight, it travels for half a year before reaching the Heavenly Pool to rest. A small bird flies for a while, taking off in the morning and settling by midday on an elm or sandalwood tree. Their abilities differ greatly, but in each case, being at ease in accordance with one’s own nature is the same.

The commentary says: “Qixie” may be understood as the name of a person, with Qi as the surname and Xie as the given name; it may also be the title of a book. The state of Qi had a book of strange and humorous tales. “Record” means to set something down; “beat” means to strike; “spiral” means to wheel and surge; and “whirlwind” refers to a rising gale. The Qixie records many extraordinary things, and Zhuangzi cites it to show that his account is not invented. The great Peng cannot suddenly take flight when bound for the Southern Sea. It must beat its wings and raise waves three thousand li high, lurching forward to gain momentum and leave the water, then spiral upward.

 宛轉鼔怒徘徊風氣相扶摇動而上塗經  九萬時隔半年從容志滿方言憩止適足  而已豈惜情乎哉 野馬也塵埃也生物之以息相吹也  注此皆鵬之所憑以飛者耳野馬者遊氣  也  䟽爾雅云邑外曰郊郊外曰牧牧外曰野  此言青春之時陽氣發動遥望藪澤之中  猶如奔馬故謂之野馬也揚土曰塵塵之  細者曰埃天地之間生物氣息更相吹動  以舉於鵬者也夫四生雜沓萬類參差形  性不同資待宜異故鵬鼓乖天之翼託風  氣以逍遥蜩張决起之翅槍榆枋而自得  斯皆率性而動禀之造化非有情於遐邇  豈措意於驕矜體斯趣者於何而語夸企  乎 天之蒼蒼其正色邪其遠而无所至極邪其 視下也亦若是則已矣  注今觀天之蒼蒼竟未知便是天之正色  邪天之爲遠而無極邪鵬之自上以視地  亦若人之自此視天則止而圖南矣言鵩  不知道里之遠近趣足以自勝而逝  䟽仰視圓穹甚爲迢遞碧空高遠筭數無  窮蒼蒼茫昧豈天正色然鵬處中天人居  下地而鵩之俯視不異人之仰觀人既不  辨天之正色鵬亦詎知地之遠近自勝取  足適至南溟鵬之圖度止在於是矣 且夫水之積也不厚則其負大舟也无力覆 杯水於坳堂之上則芥爲之舟置杯焉則膠 水淺而舟大也  注此皆明鵬之所以高飛者翼大故耳夫
Interpretation

The Peng bird circles and beats its wings, rising with the wind. The currents of air swirl around it and help it along, so that it climbs unsteadily into the high sky, passing through layer upon layer of resistance as it flies.

After reaching an altitude of ninety thousand li, it takes half a year before it finally comes to rest at its ease. Its purpose has been fulfilled; all it does is pause and rest. How could this be because it is reluctant to part with some attachment?

The drifting currents of air, the dust and motes, and the breaths stirred by living creatures as they breathe upon one another are all conditions on which the Peng bird depends in flight.

Note: These are all conditions on which the Peng bird relies to fly. The expression “wild horses” refers to the drifting currents of air in the sky.

Commentary: The Erya says that the area outside a city is called the “suburbs,” the land beyond the suburbs is called the “pasture,” and the land beyond the pasture is called the “wilds.” Here, the passage describes the Yang energy stirring in spring. Seen from afar, the air above the marshes seems to gallop like horses, hence the term “wild horses.” Dust that rises is called “dust,” and the finer particles within it are called “motes.” Between Heaven and Earth, the breaths of all kinds of creatures stir one another and help the Peng bird rise into the sky.

Living beings mingle together in great variety. The forms of the myriad things differ, as do their natures, so the conditions on which they depend naturally differ as well. The Peng bird beats its vast wings, which accord with Heaven, and soars freely by relying on the currents of air. The cicada spreads its wings and leaps with all its might; once it reaches an elm or a catalpa tree, it is content. Each acts in accordance with its own nature, receiving the inborn disposition bestowed by the transformations of nature. Neither deliberately values distant or near places nor makes a show of pride or satisfaction. Once this is understood, what is there left to boast of or strive for?

Is the sky’s deep blue its original color? Or does it appear blue because it stretches so far without end? When the Peng bird looks down from high above, its view is no different from a person gazing up at the sky from the ground.

Note: When we look up now, the sky appears vast and blue, but we still do not know whether this is its original color or whether it looks this way because it stretches so far without end. When the Peng bird looks down at the earth from on high, its view is much like ours when we look up at the sky from here. The Peng bird does not know just how far the journey extends. It flies as far as it can, then turns south.

Commentary: When we look up at the round sky, it seems high and spacious, as if it had no end. Is this vast blue scene truly the sky’s original color? The Peng bird is high in the sky, while people are on the ground; when the bird looks down at the earth, its view is no different from ours when we look up at the sky. Since people cannot distinguish the sky’s original color, how could the Peng bird know how far the earth extends? It need only fly as far as it can and reach the southern sea. That is about as far as the Peng bird’s calculations go.

Moreover, if there is not enough water, it cannot support a large boat. Pour a cupful of water into a hollow in the floor of a hall and place a blade of grass in it: the grass will be like a little boat. But if you put a cup in the water, it will sink and stay stuck. This is because the water is too shallow and the boat too large.

Note: These words explain that the Peng bird can soar high because its wings are enormous.

 質小者所資不待大則質大者所用不得  小矣故理有至分物有定極各足稱事其  濟一也若乃失乎忘生之主而營生於至  當之外事不在力動不稱倩則雖乗天之  翼不能無窮决起之飛不能無困矣  䟽且者假借是聊略之辭夫者開發在語  之端緒積聚也厚深也杯小器也坳污陷  也謂堂庭坳陷之地也芥草也膠黏也此  起譬也夫翻覆一杯之水於坳污堂地之  間將草葉爲舟則浮汎靡滯若還用杯爲  舟理必不可何者水淺舟大則黏地不行  故也是以大舟必須深水小芥不待洪流  苟其大小得宜則物皆逍遥 風之積也不厚則其負大翼也无力故九萬 里則風斯在下矣  䟽此合喻也夫水不深厚則大舟不可載  浮風不崇高大翼無由凌漢是以小鳥半  朝决起槍榆之上大鵬九萬飄風鼔扇其  下也 而後乃今培風背負青天而莫之天閼者而 後乃今將圖南  注夫所以乃今將圖南者非其好高而慕  遠也風不積則夭閼不通故耳此大鵬之  逍遥也  䟽培重也夭折也閼塞也初賴扶摇故能  昇翥重積風吹然後飛行既而上負青天  下乗風脊一凌霄漢至六月方止網羅不  逮畢弋無侵折塞之禍於何而至良由資  待合宜自致得所逍遥南海不亦宜乎 蜩與鷽鳩笑之曰我决起而飛槍榆枋時則
Interpretation

For those with limited natural abilities, the conditions they rely on need not be great; those with greater abilities require conditions that are not too meager. Each thing, then, has a range suited to it and is fulfilled by what it does, though the function is essentially the same. If one forgets what life fundamentally requires and instead struggles to make a living through pursuits beyond one’s means, acting at the wrong time and with abilities unequal to the task, then even with wings bestowed by nature one cannot fly endlessly. However hard one tries to take off, hardship is unavoidable.

“且” expresses a tentative or passing remark, while “夫” opens a topic. “积” means to gather, and “厚” means deep or substantial. “杯” is a small vessel, “坳污” a hollow in the ground, “芥” a blade of grass, and “胶” to stick fast. This passage first uses an analogy: pour a cupful of water into a hollow in the courtyard and use a blade of grass as a boat; the grass can float. But try using a cup as the boat, and it will not work. The water is shallow and the boat too large: the cup sticks to the ground and cannot move. A large boat therefore needs deep water to carry it, while a small blade of grass needs no great river or sea. When size and conditions are matched, all things can move freely in their own way.

If the wind has not gathered enough strength, it cannot bear enormous wings. Thus, when the bird flies ninety thousand li into the sky, the wind lies beneath it.

This compares wind with water. If the water is not deep enough, it cannot float a large boat; if the wind does not reach high enough, enormous wings cannot fly across the sky. A small bird that takes off at dawn can fly only as far as the elm and sandalwood trees. The great Peng, by contrast, beats its wings with the aid of the powerful wind high in the sky.

Only then does it rely on the great wind, carry the blue sky on its back, and meet no obstacle. Only then does it begin to plan its flight south.

The great Peng begins to plan its journey south only at this point. It is not that it delights in lofty heights or seeks distant places; rather, before the wind has gathered, its flight would be impeded. This is the great Peng’s freedom.

“培” means to rely on or draw support from, and “夭阏” means to break or obstruct. At first, the great Peng relies on a whirlwind to rise. Once the wind has gathered enough strength, it can fly. It then carries the blue sky on its back and rides the wind high into the clouds, coming to rest only after six months. At that point, no net can catch it and no arrow can harm it. What danger of being broken or obstructed could it face? Its conditions are well suited to it, and it has reached the place appropriate to it; that is why it can fly freely toward the South Sea.

The cicada and the little dove laughed at it, saying, “We flap our wings and fly up to the elm and sandalwood trees…”

不至而控於地而已矣奚以之九萬里而南 爲  注茍足於其性則雖大鵬無以自貴於小  鳥小鳥無羡於天池而榮願有餘矣故小  大雖殊逍遥一也  䟽蜩蟬也生七八月紫青色一名昭蟟鷽  鳩鶻鳩也即今之斑鳩是也决卒疾之貌  槍集也亦突也枋檀木也控投也引也窮  也奚何也之適也蜩鳩聞鵬鳥之宏大資  風水以高飛故嗤彼形大而劬勞欣我質  小而逸豫且騰躍不過數仞突榆檀而栖  集時困不到前林投地息而更起逍遥適  性樂在其中何須地經六月途遥九萬跋  涉辛苦南適胡爲以小笑大夸企自息而  不逍遥者未之有也 適莽蒼者三餐而反腹猶果然適百里者宿 春糧適千里者三月聚糧  注所適彌遠則聚糧彌多故其翼彌大則  積氣彌厚也  䟽適往也莽蒼郊野之色遥望之不甚分  明也果然飽貌也往於郊野來去三食路  既非遥腹猶充飽百里之行路程稍遠春  擣糧食爲一宿之備適於千里之塗路既  迢遥聚積三月之糧方充往來之食故郭  注云所適彌遠則聚糧彌多故其翼彌大  則積氣彌厚者也 之二蟲又何知  注二蟲謂鵬蜩也對大於小所以均異趣  也夫趣之所以異豈知異而異哉皆不知  所以然而自然耳自然耳不爲也此逍遥  之大意  䟽郭注云二蟲鵬蜩也對大於小所以均
Interpretation

The young turtledove mocked the great Peng bird: “Where can it possibly fly? I can leap into the air and fly to an elm or sandalwood tree. I don’t get very high before I stop. Sometimes I fall to the ground for a rest before reaching the grove ahead, then I can simply take off again. Following my own nature this way, I’m already carefree and happy. Why fly ninety thousand li, endure countless hardships, and head south?”

The commentary says that when each creature fulfills its own nature, even the great Peng need not consider itself nobler than a small bird, and the small bird need not envy the distant Celestial Lake. Each can be content with what it is capable of and enjoy its own way; that is enough. Thus, although great and small differ, they are equally free and at ease.

The explanatory commentary says: “Tiao” means cicada. It usually appears in the seventh or eighth lunar month, is purplish blue, and is also called “zhaoliao.” “Jiu” means turtledove. “Jue” describes rapid movement; “qiang” means gathering, and can also suggest darting suddenly upward; “fang” refers to sandalwood; “kong” can mean to cast down, extend, or reach the limit; “xi” means “why,” and “zhi” means “to go.” Hearing that the great Peng rises high by relying on the wind, the cicada and turtledove mock it: although it is large, they say, it has to labor hard to fly. They think that because they are small, they can fly with ease and freedom. But they do not know that the great Peng has somewhere of its own to go, nor do they understand that their own ease suits only the activities at hand. Their understanding is limited, so they use their own measure to mock the great Peng. This does not mean that they truly understand carefree freedom.

Someone traveling to the nearby outskirts takes enough food for three meals and returns with a full belly. To travel a hundred li, one must prepare provisions for a night; to travel a thousand li, one must gather provisions for three months.

The commentary says that the farther one travels, the more provisions one must prepare. The greater the Peng’s wings, the more Qi it must draw upon in flight.

The explanatory commentary says: “Shi” means to go to; “mangcang” refers to the hazy appearance of the countryside seen in the distance; “guoran” describes being full and satisfied. The journey to the nearby outskirts is short, so enough food for three meals will do for the round trip, and one returns still full. To travel a hundred li, one must prepare a night’s provisions. A thousand li is a long journey, so one must gather three months’ provisions to have enough for the round trip. This shows that the farther the journey, the more one must prepare. The great Peng’s flight is the same: to travel far, it must accumulate a deeper reserve of energy.

What, then, do these two kinds of creatures—the great Peng, and the cicada and turtledove—understand?

The commentary says that “the two creatures” refers to the great Peng and the cicada and turtledove. Setting the great alongside the small shows that they follow different paths. Why do their aims differ? It is not that they first understood their differences and then deliberately chose separate paths. Each simply follows its own nature, without contrivance. This is the broad meaning of carefree freedom.

 異趣也且大鵬摶風九萬小鳥决起榆枋  雖復遠近不同適性均也咸不知道里之  遠近各取足而自勝天機自張不知所以  既無意於高卑豈有情於優劣逍遥之致  其在兹乎而呼鵬爲蟲者大戴禮云東方  鱗蟲三百六十應龍爲其長南方羽蟲三  百六十鳳皇爲其長西方毛蟲三百六十  麒麟爲其長北方甲蟲三百六十靈龜爲  其長中央躶蟲三百六十聖人爲其長通  而爲語故名鵬爲蟲也 小知不及大知小年不及大年  注物各有性性各有極皆如年知豈跂尚  之所及哉自此已下至于列子歷舉年知  之大小各信其一方未有足以相傾者也  然後統以無待之人遺彼忘我冥此群異  異方同得而我無功名是故統小大者無  小無大者也苟有乎小大則雖大鵬之與  斥鴳宰官之與御風同爲累物耳齊死生  者無死無生者也苟有乎死生則雖大椿  之與蟪蛄彭祖之與朝菌均於短折耳故  遊於無小無大者無窮者也冥乎不死不  生者無極者也若夫逍遥而繫於有方則  雖放之使遊而有所窮矣未能無待也  䟽夫物受氣不同禀分各異智則有明有  暗年則或短或長故舉朝菌冥靈宰官榮  子皆如年智豈企尚之所及哉故知物性  不同不可强相希效也 奚以知其然也  䟽奚何也然如此也此何以知年智不相
Interpretation

Their aims and inclinations differ. The great Peng rides the wind and flies up ninety thousand li, while the little bird darts into the air and lands among the elm and sandalwood trees. Though they travel different distances, each follows its own nature and is content with its circumstances, unaware that journeys can be long or short. Each finds contentment and fulfills its own nature. Its nature unfolds of itself, though it does not know why. If they have no intention of ranking heights and depths, why would they care which is superior or inferior? Perhaps this is where carefree ease is found. As for calling the great Peng a “creature,” the Book of Rites of the Elder Dai says: in the East, there are three hundred and sixty kinds of scaled creatures, led by the Yinglong; in the South, three hundred and sixty kinds of feathered creatures, led by the phoenix; in the West, three hundred and sixty kinds of furry creatures, led by the qilin; in the North, three hundred and sixty kinds of shelled creatures, led by the numinous tortoise; and in the center, three hundred and sixty kinds of naked creatures, led by the sage. Since these beings are spoken of collectively, the great Peng too is called a “creature.”

Small cleverness is no match for great wisdom; a short life is no match for a long one.

Note: All things have their own natures, and each nature has its limits. The same is true of lifespan and wisdom. Can these be attained simply by striving after them? From here through the story of Liezi, the text gives examples of beings with different degrees of longevity and wisdom. Each is at home in its own sphere; none can overpower the others.

The text then takes “the person who depends on nothing” as its central theme: such a person forgets distinctions between self and other and mingles with these differences. Though circumstances vary, each being gains something from its own situation without seeking fame for it. Thus, the one who can encompass differences of size is the one who does not cling to size. If one clings to size, then the great Peng and the quail, as well as the official who drives a carriage and Liezi who rides the wind, are all ultimately bound by what they depend on. The one who can take death and life lightly is the one who does not cling to either. If one clings to life and death, then the great Chun tree and the cicada, Pengzu and the morning mushroom—which lives from dawn to dusk—all remain equally constrained by the brevity of their lives. Therefore, roaming in a realm where great and small are not distinguished has no end; joining with a realm beyond life and death has no bounds. If carefree ease still depends on some condition, then even roaming freely must eventually come to an end. One has yet to achieve dependence on nothing.

Commentary: The Qi that beings receive differs, and their endowments are not the same. Their wisdom may be clear or clouded, and their lives short or long. The text therefore gives examples such as the morning mushroom, the darkling spirit, the carriage driver, and Rongzi to show that lifespan and wisdom vary, and cannot be gained by admiring and trying to catch up. From this we can see that the natures of all things differ, and they cannot be forced to imitate one another.

How do we know this is really so?

Commentary: “Xi” means “what,” and “ran” means “so.” In other words: how can we know that lifespans and degrees of wisdom cannot be compared with one another?

 及若此之縣解耶假設其問以生後答 朝菌不知晦朔蟪蛄春不知秋此小年也  䟽此答前問也朝菌者謂天時滯雨於糞  壤之上熱蒸而生陰濕則生見日便死亦  謂之犬芝生於朝而死於暮故曰朝菌月  終謂之晦月旦謂之朔假令逢䕃數日便  萎終不涉三旬故不知晦朔也蟪蛄夏蟬  也生於麥梗亦謂之麥節夏生秋死故不  知春秋也菌則朝生暮死蟬則夏長秋殂  斯言齡命短促故謂之小年也 楚之南有冥靈者以五百歲爲春五百歲爲 秋上古有大椿者以八千歲爲春八千歲爲 秋  䟽冥靈大椿並木名也以葉生爲春以葉  落爲秋冥靈生於楚之南以二千歲爲一  年也而言上古者伏犧時也大椿之木長  於上古以三萬二千歲爲一年也冥靈五  百歲而花生大椿八千歲而葉落並以春  秋賒永故謂之大年也 而彭祖乃今以乆特聞衆人匹之不亦悲乎  注夫年知不相及若此之懸也比於衆人  之所悲亦可悲矣而衆人未嘗悲此者以  其性各有極也苟知其極則豪分不可相  跂天下又何所悲乎哉夫物未嘗以大欲  小而必以小羡大故舉小大之殊各有定  分非羡欲所及則羡欲之累可以絶矣夫  悲生於累累絶則悲去悲去而性命不安  者未之有也  䟽彭祖者姓籛名鏗帝顓頊之玄孫也善
Interpretation

Is it really possible to free oneself from constraint in this way? The text imagines someone raising this question in order to introduce the answer that follows.

The morning mushroom knows nothing of the dark and new moons—the end and beginning of the lunar month. The winter cicada knows nothing of spring and autumn. This shows how limited the world appears to creatures with short lives.

Commentary: This answers the question raised above. The morning mushroom is a fungus that grows where rainwater collects on dung and soil, brought forth by the heat and moisture. It appears in damp weather and dies as soon as it sees the sun. It is also called “dog fungus.” It sprouts in the morning and dies by evening, hence the name “morning mushroom.” The end of the month is called “dark moon,” and the beginning “new moon.” Even if it happens to have several cool, overcast days, it will wither before living out a month; therefore, it knows nothing of the dark and new moons. The huigu, or winter cicada, is a summer cicada that lives on wheat stalks and is also called the “wheat joint.” It is born in summer and dies in autumn, so it knows nothing of spring and autumn. The fungus lives from morning to evening, while the cicada grows in summer and dies in autumn. The point is that their lives are short; this is called a “small lifespan.”

In the south of Chu there is a tree called mingling, for which five hundred years count as one spring and five hundred years as one autumn. In ancient times there was a great chun tree, for which eight thousand years counted as one spring and eight thousand years as one autumn.

Commentary: Mingling and great chun are both names of trees. The emergence of leaves marks spring, and their falling marks autumn. Mingling grows in the south of Chu, and two thousand years make up one of its years. The text’s reference to “ancient times” means the age of Fuxi. The great chun grew in those ancient times, and thirty-two thousand years made up one of its years. Mingling flowers once every five hundred years, while the great chun sheds its leaves once every eight thousand years. Their springs and autumns are extraordinarily long, so they are said to have a “great lifespan.”

Pengzu is now especially renowned for his longevity, yet people compare themselves with him. Is that not deeply sad?

Note: Human lifespans differ so enormously. Compared with Pengzu’s, one’s own lifespan may indeed seem cause for sorrow. But ordinary people do not generally grieve over this, because each thing has its own limits. Once those limits are understood, even the slightest differences cannot be compared against one another. What, then, is there in the world to lament? Things do not necessarily envy what is small simply because they themselves are great; people, however, are always envying what is great because they themselves are small. The different sizes are cited to show that each has its own fixed limits, which envy and desire cannot change. In this way, the burden brought by envy and desire can be cut off. Sorrow arises from that burden; when the burden is gone, sorrow fades as well. Once sorrow has faded, there has never been a case in which one still could not settle one’s nature and life.

Commentary: Pengzu, surnamed Qian and given the name Keng, was a great-grandson of Emperor Zhuanxu and was skilled in …

 養性能調鼎進雉羹於堯堯封於彭城其  道可祖故謂之彭祖歷夏經殷至周年八  百歲矣特獨也以其年長壽所以聲獨聞  於世而世人比匹彭祖深可悲傷而不悲  者爲彭祖禀性遐壽非我氣類置之言外  不敢嗟傷故知生也有涯豈唯彭祖去己  一毫不可企及於是均椿菌混彭殤各止  其分而性命安矣 湯之問棘也是己  注湯之問棘亦云物各有極任之則條暢  故莊子以所問爲是也  䟽湯是帝嚳之後契之苗裔姓子名履字  天乙母氏扶都見白氣貫月感而生湯豐  下兊上身長九尺仕夏爲諸侯有聖德諸  侯歸之遭桀無道囚於夏臺後得免乃與  諸侯同盟於景亳之地會桀於昆吾之墟  大戰於鳴條之野桀奔於南巢湯既克桀  讓天下於務光務光不受湯即位乃都於  亳後改爲商殷開基之主也棘者湯時賢  人亦云湯之博士列子謂之夏革革棘聲  類蓋字之誤也而棘既是賢人湯師事之  故湯問於棘詢其至道云物性不同各有  素分循而直往固而任之殷湯請益深有  玄趣莊子許其所問故云是已 窮髮之北有冥海者天池也有魚焉其廣數 千里未有知其脩者其名爲鯤  䟽脩長也地以草爲毛髮北方寒沍之地  草木不生故名窮髮所謂不毛之地鯤魚  廣闊數千未有知其長者明其大也然溟
Interpretation

Peng Zu was skilled in nourishing life and nature. He once prepared pheasant soup for Yao, who granted him Pengcheng. Peng Zu’s knowledge of the Dao was worthy of emulation, so people called him “Peng Zu.” He lived through the Xia and Shang dynasties and into the Zhou dynasty, reaching the age of eight hundred.

“Distinct” means set apart from others. Because Peng Zu lived so long, his fame alone spread throughout the world. People often compare themselves with Peng Zu, which is truly lamentable. If someone feels no sorrow about this, it is because they believe Peng Zu was born with the gift of longevity and was unlike themselves. They therefore regard him as having nothing to do with them and dare not lament their own fate.

From this we can see that every person’s life has its own limits. Is Peng Zu really the only one who far surpassed ordinary people and was beyond anyone’s reach? We should therefore regard the Great Chun and the fungi that live from dawn to dusk as alike, and Peng Zu and those who die young as alike. When each rests content with the limits of their endowment, their nature and life can be at peace.

The story of Tang’s question to Ji makes the same point.

Note: Tang’s question to Ji also shows that all things have their own limits. When each follows its own nature, it can unfold freely and fully. Zhuangzi therefore considered Tang’s question a good one.

Commentary: Tang was a descendant of Emperor Ku and a descendant of Xie. His surname was Zi, his personal name Lü, and his courtesy name Tianyi. His mother, Fudu, saw a white light pass through the moon; after this portent, she conceived and gave birth to him. Tang had a broad upper body, long legs, and stood nine feet tall. At first he served as a feudal lord under the Xia dynasty and won the support of the other lords through his sagely virtue. Later, when the tyrannical Jie of Xia ruled without virtue, Tang was imprisoned at Xiatai. After his release, he formed an alliance with the lords at Jingbo, then met Jie at the ruins of Kunwu, and finally fought him on the plains of Mingtiao. Jie fled to Nanchao. After defeating Jie, Tang offered the realm to Wuguang. When Wuguang refused, Tang took the throne, made Bo his capital, and later founded the Shang dynasty, becoming the first ruler of Shang, also known as Yin.

Ji was a worthy man in Tang’s time; some say he was Tang’s scholar. In the Liezi, he is called “Xiage.” The characters “ge” and “ji” have similar sounds, so one may be a scribal error for the other. Since Ji was a worthy man, Tang took him as his teacher and asked him about the highest truth. The natures of things differ, and each has its own inborn limits. One need only follow one’s nature and be content with one’s endowment. Tang’s question was profound, which is why Zhuangzi approved of it by saying, “Yes.”

At the farthest reaches of the north lies a dark sea, the northern ocean, also called the Celestial Lake. In it lives a fish thousands of li across; no one knows how long it is. Its name is Kun.

Commentary: “Xiu” means long. Plants and trees on land are like the earth’s hair. In the freezing north, plants and trees do not grow, so it is called “the barren reaches,” meaning a place where vegetation does not grow. The Kun fish is thousands of li across, and no one knows how long it is. This is meant to show how enormous it is. However, the dark sea…

 海鯤鵬前文已出如今重顯者正言前引  齊諧足爲典實今牽列子再證非虚鄭重  殷勤以成其義者也 有鳥焉其名爲鵬背若太山翼若垂天之雲 摶扶揺羊角而上者九萬里絶雲氣負青天 然後圖南  䟽鵬背宏巨狀若嵩華旋風曲戾猶如羊  角既而凌摩蒼昊遏絶雲霄鼓怒放暢圖  度南海故禦寇湯問篇云世豈知有此物  哉大禹行而見之伯益知而名之夷堅聞  而誌之是也 且適南溟也斥鴳笑之曰彼且奚適也我騰 躍而上不過數仞而下翶翔蓬蒿之間此亦 飛之至也而彼且奚適也此小大之辯也  注各以得性爲至自盡爲極也向言二蟲  殊翼故所至不同或翶翔天池或畢志榆  枋直各稱體而足不知所以然也今言小  大之辯各有自然之素既非跂慕之所及  亦各安其天性不悲所以異故再出之  䟽且將也亦語助也斥小澤也鴳雀也八  尺曰仞翶翔猶嬉戲也而鴳雀小鳥縱任  斥澤之中騰舉踴躍自得蓬篙之内故能  嗤九萬之遠適欣數仞之近飛斯蓋辯小  大之性殊論各足之不二也 故夫知效一官行比一鄉德合一君而徵一 國者其自視也亦若此矣  注亦猶鳥之自得於一方也  䟽故是仍前之語夫是生後之詞國是五  等之邦鄉是萬二千五百家也自有智數  功效堪蒞一官自有名譽著聞比周鄉黨
Interpretation

The Kunpeng of the sea has already been discussed above. It is mentioned again here to clarify the account quoted earlier.

The Qixie is a sufficient source, so the Liezi is cited once more as supporting evidence, showing that this creature is not imaginary. This earnest and detailed account is meant to make the point clear.

There is a bird called the Peng. Its back is as broad as Mount Tai, and its wings are like clouds hanging at the edge of the sky. Riding a whirlwind that spirals upward, it twists and turns like a ram’s horn, soaring to a height of ninety thousand li. It passes through the clouds, bears the blue sky on its back, and then prepares to fly south.

Commentary: The Peng’s back is immensely broad, shaped like Mount Song or Mount Hua. A whirlwind coils and circles like a ram’s horn. The Peng then rises high into the air, straight toward the heavens, passes through the clouds, and stretches out its body with all its strength, planning to fly to the Southern Sea. Thus the Questions of Tang chapter of the Liezi says: “Who in the world could know that such a creature exists? Yu the Great saw it on his travels, Boyi knew of it and gave it a name, and Yijian heard of it and wrote it down.” This is what the passage refers to.

When the Peng is about to fly to the Southern Sea, a small sparrow mocks it, saying: “Where does it think it’s going? I leap into the air and, after rising only a few yards, come back down. I can circle freely among the mugwort and reeds; that is flying as far as I need to go. Why must it travel so far?” This is the difference between the small and the great.

Note: All things are content when they follow their own nature, and each reaches its limit by fully exercising its own capacities. Earlier, the text said that the two birds have different wings and so can reach different places: one flies to the Celestial Lake, while the other sets its sights only on the elm and sandalwood trees. Each is suited to its own form and nature, though it may not understand why. Here the text again discusses the difference between the small and the great. All things have innate endowments; no amount of forced striving can bring one to the realm of another. Each is also at ease with its own nature and feels no distress at being different from others. That is why the matter is explained again.

Commentary: “About to” means that something is imminent, though the word can also serve as a particle. “Chi” refers to a small marsh, and “yan” is a kind of sparrow. A ren is an ancient unit of length, equal to eight chi. “Soaring” means flying freely and playing in the air. The small yan bird leaps and flies freely in its little marsh, delighting in the mugwort thicket. It therefore mocks the Peng for intending to fly ninety thousand li, content as it is with flying only a few yards. This shows that the small and the great have different natures, and that all things have their own proper place, with none superior or inferior to another.

Thus, those whose talents qualify them for a single office, whose conduct wins the approval of everyone in a community, whose virtue suits the wishes of one ruler, or whose abilities earn the trust of an entire state regard themselves in much the same way as this small bird.

Note: This is likewise like a bird content with its own little corner of the world.

Commentary: “Thus” connects with what came before, while “fu” introduces what follows. “State” refers to a feudal state under the five ranks of nobility; a “community” comprised twelve thousand five hundred households. Some people have the intelligence and administrative ability to manage a single office; others are praised by people in their community for their reputation…

 自有道德弘博可使南面徵成邦國安有  黎元此三者禀分不同優劣斯異其於各  足未始不齊視己所能亦猶鳥之自得於  一方 而宋榮子猶然笑之  注未能齊故有笑  䟽子者有德之稱姓榮氏宋人也然如是  榮子雖能忘有未能遣無故笑宰官之徒  滯於爵禄虚淡之人猶懷嗤笑見如是所  以不齊前既以小笑大示大者不夸今則  以大笑小小者不企而性命不安者理未  之聞也 且舉世而譽之而不加勸舉世而非之而不 加沮  注審自得也  䟽舉皆也勸勵勉也沮怨喪也榮子率性  懷道謷然超俗假令世皆譽讚亦不增其  勸奬率土非毁亦不加其沮喪審自得也 定乎内外之分  注内我而外物  䟽榮子知内既非我外亦非物内外雙遣  物我兩忘故於内外之分定而不忒也 辯乎榮辱之境  注榮己而辱人  䟽忘勸沮於非譽混窮通於榮辱故能反  照明乎心智玄鑒辯於物境不復内我而  外物榮己而辱人也 斯已矣  注亦不能復過此  䟽斯此也已止也宋榮智德止盡於斯也 彼其於世未數數然也  注足於身故間於世也  䟽數數猶汲汲也宋榮率性虚淡任理直  前未嘗運智推求役心爲道栖身物外故  不汲汲然者也 雖然猶有未樹也  注唯能自是耳未能無所不可也
Interpretation

Some people possess broad and profound Virtue (De), and can govern a state and bring peace to its people; others cannot. This is because people are endowed differently, with varying strengths and weaknesses. Yet in terms of the circumstances each can attain, there is no absolute hierarchy. Everyone lives according to their own abilities, just as each bird settles in a place suited to it.

Song Rongzi—the man surnamed Rong from the state of Song—would still laugh at them.

Commentary: He laughed because he had not yet reached the state of truly seeing all things as equal.

Explanatory note: Although Song Rongzi could forget tangible rank and reputation, he could not completely free himself from attachment to “nothingness.” So he laughed at those engrossed in official rank and salary, while still looking down on those who sought quiet and detachment. This shows that he continued to distinguish among different kinds of people and had not attained true equality. Earlier, the small mocked the great, showing that the truly great do not boast of themselves. Here, the great mock the small, showing that the small need not look up to the great. Song Rongzi had not yet heard the principle by which one’s nature and life can be brought to rest.

Even if everyone under Heaven praised him, he would not become more zealous; even if everyone under Heaven criticized him, he would not become disheartened.

Commentary: This was because he clearly understood the limits of his own role.

Explanatory note: “All” means everyone; “zealous” means to spur oneself on and press forward; and “disheartened” means to lose heart. Song Rongzi followed his nature and held to the Dao (the Way), standing apart from worldly concerns. Praise from everyone under Heaven would not make him urge himself on more, and blame from everyone under Heaven would not dishearten him. He knew what he was capable of, and so could remain at ease.

He could bring the distinction between inner and outer to rest.

Commentary: He regarded himself as inward and external things as outward.

Explanatory note: Song Rongzi understood that the inner self is not fixed, and that one should not become attached to external things. He could let go of the distinctions between inner and outer, self and things, and so remain settled, unmoved by them.

He could discern the boundary between honor and shame.

Commentary: He claimed honor for himself and assigned shame to others.

Explanatory note: He was not changed by praise or criticism, nor did he place too much importance on adversity and success, honor and shame. Thus he could reflect inwardly and see things clearly, without continually elevating himself and diminishing others.

That was all.

Commentary: His state could go no further.

Explanatory note: “This” means this much; “all” means to stop. This was the limit of Song Rongzi’s wisdom and Virtue.

He did not anxiously pursue anything in the world.

Commentary: He was content with himself and so was not eager to involve himself in worldly affairs.

Explanatory note: “Anxiously” describes a hurried, restless manner. Song Rongzi followed his nature and remained detached, acting in accordance with the principles of things. He did not deliberately use his mind to pursue anything, nor exhaust his spirit in cultivating the Dao. At ease and apart from worldly concerns, he did not busy himself with them.

Even so, there remained a state he had not established and had not reached.

Commentary: He was merely convinced that his own views were right; he had not yet learned to accept everything with equanimity.

 䟽樹立也榮子捨有證無溺在偏滯故於  無待之心未立逍遥之趣智尚虧也 夫列子御風而行泠然善也  注泠然輕妙之貌  䟽姓列名禦寇鄭人也與鄭繻公同時師  於壺丘子林著書八卷得風仙之道乗風  遊泠然輕舉所以稱善也 旬有五日而後反  注苟有待焉則雖御風而行不能以一時  而周也  䟽旬十日也既得風仙遊行天下每經一  十五日回反歸家未能無所不乗故不可  一時用也 彼於致福者未數數然也  注自然御風行耳非數數然求之也  䟽致得也彼列禦寇得於風仙之福者蓋  由炎凉無心虚懷任運非關役情取捨汲  汲求之欲明爲道之要要在忘心若運役  智慮去之遠矣 此雖免乎行猶有所待者也  注非風則不得行斯必有待也唯無所不  乗者無待耳  䟽乗風輕舉雖免步行非風不進猶有須  待自宰官已下及宋榮禦寇歷舉智德優  劣不同既未洞忘咸歸有待唯當順萬物  之性遊變化之塗而能無所不成者方盡  逍遥之妙致者也 若夫乗天地之正而御六氣之辯以遊无窮 者彼且惡乎待哉  注天地者萬物之總名也天地以萬物爲  體而萬物必以自然爲正自然者不爲而  自然者也故大鵬之能高斥鴳之能下椿  木之能長朝菌之能短凡此皆自然之所
Interpretation

“Establishing” means bringing something into being. Song Rongzi gave up attachment to what exists, but remained attached to nothingness. He stayed fixed at one extreme, and so had not yet established a state of mind that relies on nothing. His freedom of wandering was still incomplete, and his wisdom still had limitations.

Liezi rode the wind, moving with lightness and grace. His feat was certainly admirable.

“Lingran” describes a light and graceful manner. Lie was his surname and Yugu was his personal name. He was from the state of Zheng and lived at the same time as Duke Xi of Zheng. He studied under Huqiu Zilin and wrote a book in eight volumes. He attained the immortal art of riding the wind. He traveled through the air on the wind, flying with ease; hence his performance is called admirable.

After fifteen days, he returned.

If someone still needs to rely on something, then even riding the wind cannot let them travel everywhere in an instant. A xun is ten days. Lie Yugu mastered the art of riding the wind and traveled throughout the world, returning home only every fifteen days. He still could not ride the wind whenever and wherever he wished, and so could not rely on it at every moment.

The blessing Lie Yugu gained from mastering the art of riding the wind did not come from urgently pursuing it again and again. He simply followed the natural course and rode the wind; he did not deliberately seek it out.

Although this spared him from walking, he still relied on something. Without wind, he could not move forward. Only someone who needs to rely on nothing is truly without dependence.

Riding the wind and traveling lightly spared him from walking, but without wind he could not advance, so he still depended on something. The text presents, in order, people of varying degrees of wisdom and virtue, from officials down to Song Rongzi and Lie Yugu. None of them has completely forgotten distinctions and attachments, so each still depends on something. Only by following the nature of all things and roaming amid change can one accomplish everything and reach the wondrous state of free and easy wandering.

As for someone who rides the natural principles of Heaven and Earth, harnesses the changes of the six energies, and roams through the boundless—what could such a person still need to rely on?

Heaven and Earth are the collective name for all things. All things give concrete expression to Heaven and Earth, and all things must take nature as their guiding principle. What is called nature is what happens spontaneously, without force. The great roc can fly high, while the quail can fly low; the chun tree lives long, while the fungus that appears at dawn and is gone by dusk lives briefly. All of this follows nature’s ordering …

 能非爲之所能也不爲而自能所以爲正  也故乗天地之正者即是順萬物之性也  御六氣之辯者即是遊變化之塗也如斯  以往則何往而有窮哉所遇斯乗又將惡  乎待哉此乃至德之人玄同彼我者之逍  遥也苟有待焉則雖列子之輕妙猶不能  以無風而行故必得其所待然後逍遥耳  而况大鵬乎夫唯與物冥而循大變者爲  能無待而常通豈自通而已哉又順有待  者使不失其所待所待不失則同於大通  矣故有待無待吾所不能齊也至於各安  其性天機自張受而不知則吾所不能殊  也夫无待猶不足以殊有待況有待者之  巨細乎  䟽天地者萬物之總名萬物者自然之别  稱六氣者季頤云平旦朝霞日午正陽日  入飛泉夜半沆瀣也天地二氣爲六氣也  又杜預云六氣者陰陽風雨晦明也又支  道林云六氣天地四時也辯者變也惡乎  待於何也言無待聖人虚懷體道故能乗  兩儀之正理順萬物之自然御六氣以逍  遥混群靈以變化苟无物而不順亦何往  而不通哉明朝徹於无窮將於何而有待  者也 故曰至人無己  注無己故順物順物而至矣 神人无功  注夫物未嘗有謝生於自然者而必欣賴  於針石故理至則迹滅矣今順而不助與  至理爲一故无功 聖人无名  注聖人者物得性之名耳未足以名其所
Interpretation

“Ability” is not something gained through deliberate action. To be able to do things naturally, without deliberate effort—that is the true Way.

To ride in accord with the proper principles of Heaven and Earth is to follow the nature of all things. To harness the changes of the Six Energies—the changing energies between Heaven and Earth, such as Yin and Yang, wind and rain—is to roam along the path of transformation. Where could such a journey ever reach its end? Whatever you encounter, you go along with it and ride upon it. Why wait for anything? This is the freedom of a person of utmost De, whose distinctions between self and other have fallen away and who has merged completely with all things.

If one depends on something, then even someone as light-footed and skilled in movement as Liezi still cannot travel without wind. He must therefore wait until he has something to rely on before he can roam freely. How much more so the great Peng bird! Only by merging with all things and following the vast transformations can one remain unobstructed without relying on anything. This unobstructedness is not only one’s own: one can also accommodate things that depend on something, allowing them to keep what they rely on. When they do not lose their support, they can accord with the state of universal unobstructedness.

Thus I cannot regard dependence and nondependence as entirely the same. Yet if all things rest in their own natures, their natural workings emerge of themselves, and they undergo change without knowing it, then I cannot distinguish among them either. If nondependence need not be distinguished from things that depend on something, how much less need we distinguish among those who depend on something according to their relative size?

Commentary: “Heaven and Earth” is a general name for all things, while “all things” is another way of referring to the varied things of nature. On the Six Energies, Ji Yi says: in the morning they are the rosy clouds; at noon, the pure Yang; at sunset, the flying springs; and at midnight, the dew of the night. The two energies of Heaven and Earth together divide into six. Du Yu says that the Six Energies are Yin, Yang, wind, rain, darkness, and brightness. Zhi Daolin says they are Heaven and Earth and the four seasons. “Transformation” means change; “What would one depend on?” asks what one should rely on.

This means that the sage who depends on nothing has a quiet, empty heart and embodies the Dao. Thus the sage rides in accord with the proper principles of the two forces of Heaven and Earth—Yin and Yang—follows the natural dispositions of all things, and harnesses the Six Energies to roam freely, blending with the spirits of the world and moving along with change. If there is nothing one cannot accommodate, what place could remain beyond reach? The sage’s understanding is clear and open, extending to the boundless. What could such a person still need to depend on?

Thus it is said:

“The Perfected Person has no self.”

Commentary: The Perfected Person has no fixed view of self and can therefore follow all things. To follow all things is to attain the state of the Perfected Person.

“The Spirit Person has no achievements.”

Commentary: The growth and transformation of things happen naturally, yet people often think they depend on needles and stones—acupuncture and other medical treatments—to take place. When the principle is truly understood, the traces of human contrivance disappear. Now, by following things without trying to help them along, one becomes one with the highest principle. Hence it is said, “has no achievements.”

“The Sage has no name.”

Commentary: “Sage” is merely a title for one through whom all things realize their natures; it is still not enough to name what the Sage…

 以得也  䟽至言其體神言其用聖言其名故就體  語至就用語神就名語聖其實一也詣於  靈極故謂之至陰陽不測故謂之神正名  百物故謂之聖也一人之上其有此三欲  顯功用名殊故有三人之别此三人者則  是前文乗天地之正御六氣之辯人也欲  結此人无待之德彰其體用反言故曰耳 堯讓天下於許由  䟽堯者帝嚳之子姓伊祁字放勛母慶都  嚳感赤龍而生身長一丈兊上而豐下眉  有八彩足履翼星有聖德年十五對唐侯  二十一代兄登帝位都平陽號曰陶唐在  位七十二年乃授舜年百二十八歲崩葬  於陽城謚曰堯依謚法翼善傳聖曰堯言  其有傳舜之功也許由隱者也姓許名由  字仲武潁川陽城人也隱於箕山師於齧  缺依山而食就河而飲堯知其賢讓以帝  位許由聞之乃臨河洗耳巢父飲犢牽而  避之曰惡吾水也死後堯封其墓謚曰箕  公即堯之師也 曰日月出矣而爝火不息其於光也不亦難 乎時而降矣而猶浸灌其於澤也不亦勞乎  䟽爝火猶炬火也亦小火也神農時十五  日一雨謂之時雨也且以日月照燭詎假  炬火之光時雨滂沲无勞浸灌之澤堯既  撝謙克讓退己進人所以致此之辭盛推  仲武也 夫子立而天下治而我猶尸之吾自視缺然 請致天下  䟽治正也尸主也致與也堯既師於許由
Interpretation

In the commentary, “Ultimate” describes the fundamental nature, “Spirit” describes its functioning, and “Sage” describes its title. When speaking of its fundamental nature, it is called “Ultimate”; when speaking of its functioning, “Spirit”; and when speaking of its title, “Sage.” In fact, all three refer to the same state: having reached the utmost subtlety, it is called “Ultimate”; because the transformations of Yin and Yang are unfathomable, it is called “Spirit”; and because it can establish the proper distinctions among all things, it is called “Sage.”

These three titles describe three aspects embodied in one person. They are distinguished by three names to clarify their functions and set their designations apart. Such a person is the one mentioned earlier, who can follow the natural order of Heaven and Earth and command the transformations of the six Qi. To sum up this person’s virtue of not depending on external things, and to bring out both its fundamental nature and its function, the passage ends by using “only” to conclude its full meaning.

Yao yields the empire to Xu You

The commentary introduces Yao as the son of Emperor Ku, with the surname Yiqi and the courtesy name Fangxun. His mother was named Qingdu. According to tradition, Emperor Ku was moved by a red dragon and Yao was born. Yao was tall, had eight-colored markings in his eyebrows, and winged-star patterns on the soles of his feet. He possessed the virtue of a Sage. At fifteen, he assisted the ruler of Tang; at twenty-one, he succeeded his elder brother and became emperor. He established his capital at Pingyang and was known as Tao Tang. After seventy-two years on the throne, he handed it over to Shun. He lived to the age of one hundred and twenty-eight, and after his death was buried at Yangcheng. His posthumous title was “Yao.” According to the rules for posthumous titles, one who “passes on sagehood through virtuous conduct” is called “Yao”—a reference to his merit in transferring the throne to Shun.

Xu You was a recluse. His surname was Xu, his given name You, and his courtesy name Zhongwu. He was from Yangcheng in Yingchuan. He lived in seclusion on Mount Ji, studied under Nie Que, and made his home in the mountains, drinking from the river. Knowing that Xu You was virtuous and capable, Yao wanted to yield the throne to him. When Xu You heard of this, he went to the river and washed his ears. Chao Fu was leading an ox to drink there. Seeing what Xu You was doing, he turned the ox away and said, “Don’t let your filth pollute my water.” After Xu You died, Yao granted his burial place an honorific title and posthumously named him “Lord of Ji.” The commentary says that Chao Fu was Yao’s teacher.

The sun and moon have already risen, yet the torch is still burning; timely rain has already fallen, yet one labors to irrigate

The commentary explains that “torch” refers to a torch, or a faint little flame. It is said that in the time of Shennong, rain fell once every fifteen days; such rain was called “timely rain.” With the sun and moon already shining over the earth, what need is there for a torch to add more light? With timely rain already abundant, why labor to irrigate and add more water? Yao was humble and yielding, putting himself last and promoting others, so these words greatly praise Xu You.

“If you, sir, were to ascend the throne, the empire could be governed. While I still occupy this position, I feel it is unworthy of me. Please allow me to hand the empire over to you.”

The commentary explains that “govern” means to bring peace to the empire; “occupy” means to preside over or hold a position; and “hand over” means to entrust. Continuing from the preceding passage, it says that since Yao regarded Xu You as his teacher, he wanted to hand the empire over to him.

 故謂之爲夫子若仲武立爲天子宇内必  致太平而我猶爲物主自視缺然不足請  將帝位讓與賢人 許由曰子治天下天下既已治也  注夫能令天下治不治天下者也故堯以  不治治之非治之而治者也今許由方明  既治則無所代之而治實由堯故有子治  之言宜忘言以尋其所況而或者遂云治  之而治者堯也不治而堯得以治者許由  也斯失之遠矣夫治之由乎不治爲之出  乎无爲也取於堯而足豈借之許由哉若  謂拱默乎山林之中而後得稱無爲者此  莊老之談所以見棄於當塗者自必於有  爲之域而不反者斯之由也  䟽治謂理也既盡也言堯治天下乆以昇  平四海八荒盡皆清謐何勞讓我過辭費  然覩莊文則貶堯而推許尋郭注乃劣許  而優堯者何耶欲明放勛大聖仲武大賢  賢聖二塗相去遠矣故堯負扆汾陽而喪  天下許由不夷其俗乎獨立高山圓照偏  溺斷可知矣是以莊子援襌讓之迹故有  爝火之談郭生察无待之心更致不治之  說可謂探微索隱了文合義宜尋其㫖况  无所稍嫌也 而我猶代子吾將爲名乎名者實之賔也吾 將爲賔乎  注夫自任者對物而順物者與物无對故  堯无對於天下而許由與稷契爲匹矣何  以言其然邪夫與物冥者故群物之所不  能離也是以无心玄應唯感之從汎乎若
Interpretation

That is why he was called “Master,” an honorific for a virtuous person. If Zhongwu (Xu You’s courtesy name) were installed as Son of Heaven, the realm would surely be at peace. Yet I still regard myself as master of all things, and feel instead that I fall short and am unworthy of the position. Please allow me to yield the throne to a worthy person.

Xu You said, “You have governed the realm, and the realm is already well governed.”

Commentary: The one who can bring peace to the realm is precisely the one who does not set out to govern it. Thus Yao governed the realm through “non-governing”: because he did not govern deliberately, the realm became peaceful. Xu You is explaining that since the realm is already at peace, there is nothing for him to take over from Yao and govern. In truth, the realm’s peace is Yao’s achievement. Therefore, when Xu You says, “You have governed the realm,” the meaning should be understood rather than taken rigidly at face value. Some have claimed that Yao brought peace by deliberately governing the realm, while Xu You, by not governing, enabled Yao to govern. This interpretation is far off the mark.

The root of peace in the realm lies in “non-governing”; purposeful action, too, should arise naturally from Wuwei (non-action). Yao’s governance was already sufficient; why would it need Xu You’s help? If one thinks that only withdrawing to the mountains and remaining silent counts as Wuwei, then this is precisely why the teachings of Zhuangzi and Laozi were rejected by those in power: people cling to the realm of purposeful action and refuse to return to Wuwei.

Explanatory note: Here, “govern” means to rule, and “already” means that something has taken place. The point is that Yao had governed the realm for a long time, and the four quarters were already peaceful and settled. Why spend more words yielding the throne to me? Yet if we read the original text of the Zhuangzi, we find that it disparages Yao and honors Xu You; if we read Guo Xiang’s commentary, we find that he exalts Yao and looks down on Xu You. Why? This is meant to show that Yao was a great sage, while Zhongwu was a great worthy: the realms of sages and worthies differ, and the distance between them is considerable. Yao abdicated on the northern bank of the Fen River, yet still lost the realm; Xu You, by contrast, kept to his way of life, standing alone on a high mountain, beholding all things without becoming trapped in partiality. Their relative standing is clear from this.

Thus Zhuangzi borrowed the story of abdication and used the image of a “tiny flame.” Having grasped the state of “no dependence,” Guo Xiang also introduced the idea of “non-governing.” One might say that he probed the subtle meaning, bringing his commentary into accord with the text. As long as one follows its intent and context, there is nothing amiss.

“If I continued to govern the realm for you, would I be seeking fame? Fame is merely an appendage of substance. Would I want to become that appendage?”

Commentary: One who takes responsibility for governing stands in opposition to external things; one who follows along with all things does not stand opposed to them. Thus Yao, in facing the realm, harbored no sense of opposition, whereas Xu You was placed alongside Ji and Qi (legendary worthy ministers who assisted Yao and Shun) for comparison. Why say this? Because one who becomes one with all things is someone from whom all things cannot separate. Therefore, he has no selfish desires and can respond to subtle transformations, acting only as things call forth a response. He is open and at ease, as though…

 不繫之舟東西之非己也故无行而不與  百姓共者亦无往而不爲天下之君矣以  此爲君若天之自高實君之德也若獨亢  然立乎高山之頂非夫人有情於自守守  一家之偏尚何得專此此故俗中之一物  而爲堯之外臣耳若以外臣待乎内主斯  有爲君之名而无任君之實也  䟽許由偃蹇箕山逍遥潁水膻臊榮利厭  穢聲名而堯殷勤致請猶希代己許由若  高九五將爲萬乗之名然實以生名名從  實起實則是内是主名便是外是賔捨主  取賔喪内求外既非隱者所尚故云吾將  爲賔也 鷦鷯巢於深林不過一枝偃鼠飲河不過滿 腹  注性各有極苟足其極則餘天下之財也  䟽鷦鷯巧婦鳥也一名工雀一名女匠亦  名桃蟲好深處而巧爲巢也偃鼠形大小  如牛亦黑色獐脚脚有三甲耳似象耳尾  端白好入河飲水而鳥巢一枝之外不假  茂林獸飲滿腹之餘無勞浩汗況許由安  兹蓬蓽不顧金闈樂彼蔬食詎勞玉食也 歸休乎君予无所用天下爲  注均之無用而堯獨有之明夫懷豁者無  方故天下樂推而不厭  䟽予我也許由寡欲清廉不受堯讓故謂  堯云君宜速還黄屋歸反紫微襌讓之辭  宜其休息四海之尊於我无用九五之貴  予何用爲 庖人雖不治庖尸祝不越樽俎而代之矣  注庖人尸祝各安其所司鳥獸萬物各足
Interpretation

Even if a cook does not prepare the food himself, the official in charge of the sacrifices must not step over the wine vessels and offerings to take over the cooking. This means that each person should keep to their own duties and not overstep their role to do someone else’s work.

[Commentary] The wren builds its nest in a deep forest, needing no more than a single branch. The legendary water rat goes to the river to drink, but needs only enough to fill its belly. All things have their own limits. Once their natural needs are met, the world’s surplus wealth has nothing to do with them. So why would Xu You, content with a humble dwelling and indifferent to grand palace gates, fond of coarse tea and simple food, pursue the delicacies of an emperor?

“Please go back, my lord! The world is of no use to me.”

[Note] Xu You believed that neither he nor Yao needed the throne. Yet because Yao possessed all under Heaven, he could show himself to be broad-minded, selfless, and free of fixation; this was why the people were glad to support him.

[Commentary] “Yu” means “I.” Xu You was pure-hearted, desired little, and kept himself incorruptible. He refused Yao’s offer to yield the throne to him, and said to Yao: “My lord, please hurry back to your throne. The supreme position you hold over all under Heaven is of no use to me. Why would I want to become the Son of Heaven?”

Earlier, the text says that if Yao could be as naturally lofty and far-reaching as Heaven, he would embody a ruler’s De (Virtue). But if he merely stood alone atop a mountain, clinging to his own prejudices, he could not truly become the ruler of all under Heaven. If Xu You were to serve a ruler in the inner court as a subject, he would have the title of a subject without taking on the actual duties of a ruler. A title is external; substance is fundamental. Giving up what is fundamental to pursue a title was precisely what Xu You refused to do. That is why he said, “I will become a guest”—one who neither holds the throne nor takes on a ruler’s duties.

 於所受帝堯許由各靜其所遇此乃天下  之至實也各得其實又何所爲乎哉自得  而已矣故堯許之行雖異其於逍遥一也  䟽庖人謂掌庖厨之人則今之太官供膳  是也尸者太廟中神主也祝者則今太常  太祝是也執祭版對尸而祝之故謂之尸  祝也樽酒器也俎肉器也而庖人尸祝者  各有司存假令膳夫懈怠不肯治庖尸祝  之人終不越局濫職棄於樽俎而代之宰  烹亦猶帝堯襌讓不治天下許由亦不去  彼山林就兹帝位故注云帝堯許由各靜  於所遇也已 肩吾問於連叔曰吾聞言於接輿  䟽肩吾連叔並古之懷道人也接輿者姓  陸名通字接輿楚之賢人隱者也與孔子  同時而佯狂不仕常以躬耕爲務楚王知  其賢聘以黃金百鎰車駟二乗並不受於  是夫負妻戴以遊山海莫知所終肩吾聞  接輿之言過無準的故問連叔詢其義㫖  而言吾聞言於接輿者聞接輿之言也莊  生寄三賢以明堯之一聖所聞之狀具列  於下文也 大而无當往而不反吾驚怖其言猶河漢而 无極也  䟽所聞接輿之言怖弘而无的當一往而  陳梗槩曾無反覆可尋吾竊聞之驚疑怖  恐猶如上天河漢迢遞清高尋其源流略  无窮極也 大有逕庭不近人情焉  䟽逕庭猶過差亦是直往不顧之貌也謂  接輿之言不偶於俗多有過差不附世情
Interpretation

Emperor Yao and Xu You each found contentment in the circumstances they encountered. This is the truest principle under Heaven. Each was able to remain within his proper role and find what was true for him. What more was there to do? They simply followed things as they naturally unfolded and took pleasure in what they had. Thus, though Emperor Yao and Xu You acted differently, they were alike in their freedom and ease.

The commentary explains: “Cook” refers to the person in charge of the kitchen, like an official today who oversees the provision of meals. “Corpse” refers to the spirit tablet in the ancestral temple. “祝” refers to the person who presides over the sacrifice, holding a ritual tablet and addressing the spirit tablet with prayers. The vessel for wine is called a zun, and the vessel for meat a zu. The kitchen steward and the person who presides over the sacrifice each have their own duties. If the steward neglected his work and refused to manage the kitchen, the officiant would not overstep his authority, set aside the wine and meat vessels, and cook in his place. After Emperor Yao abdicated the throne, he no longer governed the realm; Xu You, for his part, did not leave the mountains and forests to accept the throne. Each remained content in his own place.

Shoulder-Wu asked Lianshu, “I once heard Jieyu say some things.”

The commentary explains: Shoulder-Wu and Lianshu were both ancient men of the Dao. Jieyu, surnamed Lu and given the name Tong, was a worthy recluse from the state of Chu who lived at the same time as Confucius. He feigned madness and refused to serve in office, making his living by farming. The King of Chu knew of his abilities and once offered him a great quantity of gold and two chariots with horses, but Jieyu declined. He later traveled through mountains and seas with his wife, and no one knew what became of him. After hearing Jieyu’s words, Shoulder-Wu found their underlying principle hard to grasp, so he sought Lianshu’s advice. Through the dialogue among these three men, Zhuangzi illustrates how people might react when they hear the words of a sage like Yao. The details follow below.

“Those words are grand, but have no firm basis. They press forward without ever turning back to examine themselves. When I heard them, I was both astonished and afraid. They seemed like the Milky Way in the sky, so vast that they had no end.”

The commentary explains: The words of Jieyu that Shoulder-Wu heard were sweeping in tone but had no clear point of grounding. They simply unfolded their general meaning without turning back to explain it again and again, leaving no way to follow them. After hearing them, I felt perplexed and afraid. The words seemed like the distant, lofty Milky Way: if one tried to trace their source and course, they appeared endless.

“Those words are far removed from common sense and do not accord with ordinary human feeling.”

The commentary explains: “Jingting” refers to an excessive gap; it can also suggest pressing straight ahead without regard for anything else. Here it means that Jieyu’s words did not accord with familiar, conventional views and seemed far removed from ordinary human feeling.

 故大言不合於理耳也 連叔曰其言謂何哉  䟽陸通之說其若何此則反質肩吾所聞  意謂 曰藐姑射之山有神人居焉肌膚若冰雪綽 約若處子  注此皆寄言耳夫神人即今所謂聖人也  夫聖人雖在廟堂之上然其心无異於山  林之中世豈識之哉徒見其戴黄屋佩玉  璽便謂足以纓紼其心矣見其歷山川同  民事便謂足以憔悴其神矣豈知至至者  之不虧哉今言王德之人而寄之此山將  明世所无由識故乃託之於絶垠之外而  推之於視聽之表耳處子者不以外傷内  䟽藐遠也山海經云姑射山在寰海之外  有神聖之人戢機應物時須揖讓即爲堯  舜時須干戈即爲湯武綽約柔弱也處子  未嫁女也言聖人動寂相應則空有並照  雖居廊廟无異山林和光同塵在染不染  冰雪取其潔净綽約譬以柔和處子不爲  物傷姑射語其絶遠此明堯之盛德窈冥  玄妙故託之絶垠之外推之視聽之表斯  蓋寓言耳亦何必有姑射之實乎宜忘言  以尋其所況此即肩吾述己昔聞以答連  叔之辭者也 不食五穀吸風飲露  注俱食五穀而獨爲神人明神人者非五  穀所爲而特禀自然之妙氣  䟽五穀者黍稷麻菽麥也言神聖之人降  生應物挺淳粹之精靈禀陰陽之秀氣雖  順物以資待非五穀之所爲託風露以清  虚豈四時之能變也
Interpretation

That is why grandiose claims seem exaggerated: they do not accord with what is reasonable.

Lianshu asked, “What did he say?”

Commentary: What, exactly, were the words spoken by Lu Tong, also known as Jieyu? Here Lianshu is asking rhetorically what Shuwu had heard earlier.

Shuwu replied, “He said that on Mount Miaogushe lives a spiritlike person, with skin as white as ice and snow and a graceful bearing like an unmarried maiden.”

Note: These are all figurative expressions. The “spiritlike person” is what we today would call a sage. Even when a sage is in court, there is no difference in his inner state from when he is living in the mountains and forests. How could ordinary people understand this? They see the sage wearing an emperor’s crown and carrying a jade seal, and assume these are enough to bind his heart. They see him traveling through mountains and rivers and attending to the affairs of the people, and assume these are enough to exhaust his spirit. How could they know that one who has truly reached the highest state is not inwardly harmed by any of this?

Here, the virtue of a ruler is attributed to the spiritlike person on Mount Miaogushe to show that ordinary people cannot recognize such virtue. So it is placed in a faraway land and said to lie beyond the reach of sight and hearing. “Maiden” means that she is not inwardly harmed by external things.

Commentary: “Miao” means distant. The Classic of Mountains and Seas says that Mount Gushe lies beyond the great sea, where sacred beings dwell. They respond to all things in keeping with the times: when yielding is called for, they are like Yao and Shun; when force is needed, they are like Tang and Wu. “Graceful” describes a delicate, gentle bearing; “maiden” means an unmarried woman. The passage says that whether active or at rest, the sage acts in harmony with the moment. He can perceive emptiness and also see clearly what is real. Even in court, he is no different from when he is in the mountains and forests: he can live among ordinary people without being tainted by worldly ways. “Ice and snow” are metaphors for purity; “graceful” evokes gentleness of bearing; and “maiden” represents freedom from harm by external things. The name “Gushe” conveys a state far beyond the ordinary. Yao’s profound, mysterious virtue is therefore placed in a distant land and described as lying beyond the reach of sight and hearing. These are all fables; Mount Gushe and its spiritlike person may not really exist. Readers should grasp the metaphors without clinging to the literal wording. This passage is Shuwu recounting what he once heard, in reply to Lianshu.

The spiritlike person eats no grain, but breathes the wind and drinks the dew.

Note: Everyone eats grain, but the spiritlike person is said to live in this way to show that he was not formed by grain, but endowed with the subtle, wondrous Qi of Nature.

Commentary: The five grains are millet, broomcorn millet, hemp, beans, and wheat. The passage says that sacred beings are born with pure, subtle, wondrous Qi and embody the finest essence of Yin-Yang as they respond to all things. Although they, too, adapt to worldly circumstances and rely on external things to live, they were not formed by grain. Their sustenance from wind and dew is a figurative way of expressing their purity and detachment, and their freedom from change with the seasons.

乗雲氣御飛龍而遊乎四海之外  䟽智照靈通无心順物故曰乗雲氣不疾  而速變現无常故曰御飛龍寄生萬物之  上而神超六合之表故曰遊乎四海之外  也 其神凝使物不疵癘而年穀熟吾以是狂而 不信也  注夫體神居靈而窮理極妙者雖靜默閒  堂之裏而玄同四海之表故乗兩儀而御  六氣同人群而驅萬物茍无物而不順則  浮雲斯乗矣无形而不載則飛龍斯御矣  遺身而自得雖淡然而不待坐忘行忘忘  而爲之故行若曳枯木止若聚死灰是以  云其神凝也其神凝則不凝者自得矣世  皆齊其所見而斷之豈嘗信此哉  䟽凝靜也疵癘疾病也五穀熟謂有年也  聖人形同枯木心若死灰本迹一時動寂  俱妙凝照潜通虚懷利物遂使四時順序  五穀豐登人无灾害物无夭枉聖人之處  世有此功能肩吾未悟至言謂爲狂而不  信 連叔曰然瞽者无以與乎文章之觀聾者无 以與乎鐘鼓之聲豈唯形骸有聾盲哉夫知 亦有之  注不知至言之極妙而以爲狂而不信此  知之聾盲哉  䟽瞽者謂眼無眹縫冥冥如鼓皮也聾者  耳病也盲者眼根敗也夫目視耳聽蓋有  物之常情也既瞽既聾不可示之以聲色  也亦猶至言妙道唯懸解者能知愚惑之  徒終身未悟良由智障盲闇不能照察豈
Interpretation

To command the clouds and ride the flying dragon, roaming beyond the four seas.

Commentary: The sage’s wisdom is lucid, subtle, and far-reaching. He responds to all things without selfish intent; hence the phrase “to command the clouds.” His actions are not bound by speed or slowness, and his transformations have no fixed form; hence “to ride the flying dragon.” He takes his place above the myriad things, while his spirit ranges beyond the four quarters of Heaven and Earth; hence “roaming beyond the four seas.”

When his spirit is settled, he can keep the myriad things free from illness and calamity, and bring the crops to ripeness and abundance. Shoulder-Wu therefore found this absurd and could not believe it.

Note: One who truly understands the spirit, dwells at ease in a realm of illumination, probes the principles of things, and comprehends their subtle workings can connect in spirit with all that lies beyond the four seas, even while sitting quietly in an empty room. Thus he follows the Yin-Yang of Heaven and Earth and commands the six energies—Yin, Yang, wind, rain, darkness, brightness, and other forces of nature. He can live among people and also command the myriad things. If there is nothing he cannot follow, he is like one riding drifting clouds; if there is no form he cannot bear, he is like one commanding a flying dragon.

He forgets himself and finds joy in this. Though detached and practicing Wuwei (non-action), he does not have to deliberately train in “sitting in oblivion”—forgetting body, mind, and external things while seated—or “walking in oblivion”—acting without clinging to a self. He naturally forgets himself as he goes about his life. In action he is like a withered tree; at rest he is like gathered ashes. That is why his spirit is settled. Once his spirit is settled, even things that cannot settle become at ease in their own way. People always judge everything by what they themselves have seen. How, then, could they believe this teaching?

Commentary: “Settled” means tranquil and composed. “Afflictions and maladies” refers to illness; “the Five Grains ripen” means that the harvest is good and the crops plentiful.

The sage’s body is like a withered tree, and his mind like dead ashes. His inner nature and outward appearance are one, and both movement and stillness are perfectly attuned. Settled and luminous, he silently connects with the myriad things and benefits them through an open, tranquil mind. Thus the seasons follow their proper course, the Five Grains flourish, the people suffer no calamities, and the myriad things are neither cut short nor wronged. The sage lives in the world and can have this effect. Shoulder-Wu had not grasped these ultimate and subtle words, so he thought them absurd and did not believe them.

Uncle Lian said, “A blind person cannot appreciate the beauty of colors and patterns; a deaf person cannot hear the sound of bells and drums. Could blindness and deafness belong only to the body? A person’s understanding, too, can be deaf and blind.”

Note: To fail to understand the utmost subtlety of ultimate principles, and then to call them absurd and disbelieve them, is to be deaf and blind in one’s understanding.

Commentary: “Blind” refers to a person whose eyes have no perception, dark as if covered with drum skin. “Deaf” refers to an affliction of the ears; “blind” refers to damage to the eye faculty—the ability to see. Seeing with the eyes and hearing with the ears are ordinary human capacities. Once these are lost, one cannot show a person the beauty of sounds and colors. The same is true of the wondrous Way of ultimate principle: only those able to free themselves from inner constraints can understand it. The ignorant and deluded cannot grasp it throughout their lives. The root cause is that their wisdom is obstructed and their minds clouded, leaving them unable to see clearly…

 唯形質獨有之耶是以聞接輿之言謂爲  狂而不信自此已下是連叔答肩吾之辭  也 是其言也猶時女也  注謂此接輿之所言者自然爲物所求但  知之聾盲者謂無此理  䟽是者指斥之言也時女少年處室之女  也指此接輿之言猶如窈窕之女綽約凝  潔爲君子所求但智之聾盲言謂無此理  也 之人也之德也將旁礴萬物以爲一世蘄乎 亂孰弊弊焉以天下爲事  注夫聖人之心極兩儀之至會窮萬物之  妙數故能體化合變无往不可旁礴萬物  无物不然世以亂故求我我無心也我苟  无心亦何爲不應世哉然則體玄而極妙  者其所以會通萬物之性而陶鑄天下之  化以成堯舜之名者常以不爲爲之耳熟  弊弊焉勞神苦思以事爲事然後能乎  䟽之是語助亦歎美也旁礴猶混同也蘄  求也孰誰也之人者歎堯是聖人之德者  歎堯之盛德也言聖人德合二儀道齊群  品混同萬物制馭百靈世道荒淫蒼生離  亂故求大聖君臨安撫而虚舟懸鏡應感  无心誰肯勞形弊智經營區宇以事爲事  然後能事故老子云爲无爲事无事又云  取天下常以无事及其有事不足以取天  下也 之人也物莫之傷  注夫安於所傷則傷不能傷傷不能傷而  物亦不傷之也 大浸稽天而不溺大旱金石流土山焦而不 熱
Interpretation

Is it only the physical body that can undergo such a state? So, when I heard Jieyu’s words, I thought he was mad and did not believe what he said.” From this point onward, Lianshu is replying to Jianwu.

What Jieyu says is like a young woman.

Note: What Jieyu says is something people would naturally seek. Yet those whose minds are deaf and blind think that no such principle exists in the world.

Commentary: Here, “is” is a particle expressing reproach or judgment. “Young woman” refers to a girl. The passage says that Jieyu’s words are like a beautiful, gentle, and pure young woman, worthy of a gentleman’s pursuit. Yet those whose minds are deaf and blind say that no such principle exists in the world.

A person like this has a De that embraces all things and becomes one with them. Everyone hopes the world will be well governed. Would he really wear himself out, making the governance of the world his personal concern?

Note: The sage’s mind reaches the utmost limits of Heaven and Earth and Yin-Yang, and understands the mysteries of the transformations of all things. Thus he can perceive change and respond to things, meeting whatever comes his way. He embraces all things, recognizing that each has its own natural principle. When the age is in disorder, people hope a sage will come to govern. The sage has no fixed intention of his own; if he has no fixed intention, why would he not respond to the affairs of the world? Yet those who grasp the mysterious and understand the highest principle can bring together the natures of all things, shape the transformations of the world, and earn a reputation like that of Yao and Shun precisely because they accomplish things without deliberate action. If they instead exhaust their minds in anxious thought and busyness, making the conduct of affairs an end in itself, can they be sure to govern the world well?

Commentary: “Zhi” is a grammatical particle that also conveys praise here. “Vastly encompassing” means to merge with and embrace all things. “Seek” means to hope for, and “who” means “who would.” “A person like this” praises Yao as a sage, while “his De” praises Yao’s abundant De. The meaning is that the sage’s De accords with Heaven and Earth, and his Dao is at one with all things; he can embrace all things and govern the myriad beings. When the age is chaotic and the people suffer, they hope a sage will rule the world and comfort them. The sage is like an empty boat or a clear mirror: he responds to things as they come, without private intentions. Why would he spend his energy and wear out his body, deliberately managing the affairs of the world and making the conduct of affairs an end in itself? Laozi says, “Act through Wuwei, and treat things as matters of no concern.” He also says, “In governing the world, one always does so through inaction; with too much activity, the world cannot be governed.”

A person like this cannot be harmed by external things.

Note: If one can calmly face the possibility of being harmed, harm cannot injure them. If harm cannot injure them, then external things cannot harm them either.

When floods cover the sky, he will not drown. In a great drought, when metal and stone melt and the mountains burn to ash, he feels no heat.

 注无往而不安則所在皆適死生无變於  己況溺熱之間哉故至人之不嬰乎禍難  非避之也推理直前而自然與吉會  䟽稽至也夫達於生死則无死无生宜於  水火則不溺不熱假令陽九流金之灾百  六滔天之禍紛紜自彼於我何爲故郭注  云死生无變於己何況溺熱之間也哉 是其塵垢粃糠將猶陶鑄堯舜者也孰肯以 物爲事  注堯舜者世事之名耳爲名者非名也故  夫堯舜者豈直堯舜而已哉必有神人之  實焉今所稱堯舜者徒名其塵垢粃糠耳  䟽散爲塵膩爲垢穀不熟爲粃穀皮曰糠  皆猥物也鎔金曰鑄範土曰陶謚法翼善  傳聖曰堯仁聖盛明曰舜夫堯至本妙絶  形名混迹同塵物甘其德故立名謚以彰  聖體然名者粗法不異粃糠謚者世事何  殊塵垢既而矯諂佞妄將彼塵垢鍛鑄爲  堯用此粃糠埏埴作舜豈知妙體胡可言  耶是以誰肯以物爲事者也 宋人資章甫而適諸越越人斷髮文身無所 用之  䟽此起譬也資貨也越國逼近江湖斷髮  文身以避蛟龍之難也章甫冠名也故孔  子生於魯衣縫掖長於宋冠章甫而宋實  微子之裔越乃太伯之苗二國貿遷往來  乃以章甫爲貨且章甫本充首飾必須雲  鬟承冠越人斷髮文身資貨便成无用亦  如榮華本猶滯著富貴起自驕矜堯既體
Interpretation

Note: A person who can truly remain at ease wherever he is will feel free wherever he goes. Neither death nor life can alter his state of mind, so how could drowning or being scorched by heat do so? Thus, the Perfected Person (one who has attained the highest spiritual state) is not burdened by calamities and hardship. This is not because he deliberately avoids them, but because he proceeds calmly in accord with how things are; good fortune then comes to him naturally.

Commentary: Those who understand life and death are not troubled by them. Those who adapt to water and fire are not afraid of drowning or being scorched. Even in a great drought, amid heat so intense that metal and stone seem to melt, or in a flood that surges to the heavens, what effect can all the turmoil in the world around them have on them? Guo Xiang’s commentary says: “Neither death nor life can alter one’s state of mind, so how much less could drowning or being scorched by heat do so?”

In the eyes of the Perfected Person, worldly things are like dust, grime, chaff, and husks. He could even use such things to mold and cast Yao and Shun. Who, then, would regard external things as important?

Note: Yao and Shun are merely names by which the world knows them. What a name refers to is not the same as the underlying reality. So are the so-called Yao and Shun merely the historical Yao and Shun? Surely they also had an inner spirit that transcended their names. In the eyes of the Perfected Person, the people now called “Yao” and “Shun” are no more than dust, grime, chaff, and husks.

Commentary: Fine, scattered earth is called “dust”; dirt that clings is called “grime.” Immature grains are called “chaff,” and the outer coverings of grain are called “husks.” All these things are lowly and useless. The word for “casting” refers to smelting metal; “molding” refers to shaping pottery in a mold. According to the rules for posthumous titles, one who supports good government and carries on the sacred Way is called “Yao,” while one who is benevolent, wise, and sage-like is called “Shun.”

Yao and Shun originally possessed a subtle state that transcended bodily form and names. They moved among the world and lived alongside all things. Because of their Virtue, people gave them names and posthumous titles to make their sage-like Virtue known. Yet names are ultimately only rough descriptions, no more real than chaff; posthumous titles are merely worldly affairs, no loftier than dust. Later generations, through affectation, flattery, and falsehood, forged dust and grime into “Yao” and kneaded chaff and husks into “Shun.” How could they understand that subtle reality, or explain it in words? Who, then, would regard these external labels as important?

People of the state of Song took Zhangfu hats, an ancient style of headwear, to the state of Yue to sell. The people of Yue cut their hair short and tattooed their bodies, so the hats were of no use to them.

Commentary: This is an analogy that illustrates the preceding point. “Goods” means merchandise. Yue lay near rivers and lakes, and its people cut their hair short and tattooed their bodies. It is said that they did so to protect themselves from harm by flood dragons. A Zhangfu is a kind of hat. Confucius was born in Lu and later grew up in Song; he wore a Zhangfu. Song was founded by descendants of Weizi, while Yue was founded by descendants of Taibo. The two states traded with one another, so people from Song took Zhangfu hats to Yue as merchandise. But a Zhangfu is a head ornament that needs a topknot to support it. Since the people of Yue cut their hair short and tattooed their bodies, they naturally had no use for it.

This is like people’s attachment to splendor and wealth: splendor can easily make them stuck and resistant to change, while wealth can easily make them proud. Once Yao had realized…

 道洞忘故能无用天下故郭注云夫堯之  无所用天下爲亦猶越人无所用章甫耳 堯治天下之民平海内之政往見四子藐姑 射之山汾水之陽窅然喪其天下焉  注夫堯之无用天下爲亦猶越人之无所  用章甫耳然遺天下者固天下之所宗天  下雖宗堯而堯未嘗有天下也故窅然喪  之而嘗遊心於絶冥之境雖寄坐萬物之  上而未始不逍遥也四子者蓋寄言以明  堯之不一於堯耳夫堯實冥矣其迹則堯  也自迹觀冥内外異域未足怪也世徒見  堯之爲堯豈識其冥哉故將求四子於海  外而據堯於所見因謂與物同波者失其  所以逍遥也然未知至遠之迹順者更近  而至高之所會者反下也若乃厲然以獨  高爲至而不夷乎俗累斯山谷之士非无  待者也奚足以語至極而遊无窮哉  䟽治言緝理政言風教此合喻也汾水出  自太原西入于河水北曰陽則今之晋州  平陽縣在汾水北昔堯都也窅然者寂寥  是深遠之名喪之言忘是遣蕩之義而四  子者四德也一本二迹三非本非迹四非  非本迹也言堯反照心源洞見道境超兹  四句故言往見四子也夫聖人無心有感  斯應故能緝理萬邦和平九土雖復凝神  四子端拱而坐汾陽統御萬機窅然而喪  天下斯蓋即本即迹即體即用空有雙照  動寂一時是以姑射不異汾陽山林豈殊
Interpretation

The Dao’s substance is profound and far-reaching. It can make people forget everything, and so it can also keep them from regarding the world as their concern. Guo Xiang’s commentary says: “Yao did not treat the world as something for his own use, just as the people of Yue had no use for the ceremonial cap of the Central Plains, the zhangfu.”

Yao governed the world and brought peace throughout the land. Later, he went to Mount Gushe and the northern bank of the Fen River to visit four sages. His mind and spirit were utterly still, as though he had already forgotten the world.

Note: Yao did not claim the world as his own, just as the people of Yue had no use for the zhangfu. Yet precisely because Yao could let go of the world, the people of the world revered him. Although they revered him, Yao never regarded the world as his own. Thus he could quietly forget the world, while his spirit continually roamed in a deep and traceless realm. Even though he stood above all things, he remained free and at ease.

The “four sages” were likely introduced to show that Yao was not confined to the image of Yao known to ordinary people. Inwardly, Yao had already merged with the Dao; what people saw was only his outward conduct. The inner and outer belong to different levels, and there is nothing strange about that. People saw only Yao acting as Yao, without understanding the state of his inner mind. So if one thinks only of searching overseas for the four sages, and judges Yao solely by what is visible before one’s eyes, one may mistakenly conclude that engaging with worldly affairs means losing one’s freedom. In truth, they do not know that those who truly travel far can follow the course of things and thereby seem closer; those who truly reach the heights can also remain connected with the lowly. If one takes aloofness and self-regard as the highest state, and cannot face worldly entanglements with equanimity, one has attained no more than the state of a hermit in the mountains. Such a person still depends on something. How could this suffice to speak of the ultimate Dao and boundless freedom?

Commentary: “Govern” means to put things in order and administer them; “government” refers to commands and instruction. Here these terms are used as metaphors for governing the world. The Fen River rises in Taiyuan and flows west into the Yellow River. The north bank of a river is called its “sunny side,” so the northern bank of the Fen refers to the area around present-day Pingyang County in Jinzhou, traditionally said to have been Yao’s capital. “Profoundly still” describes a state of quiet depth; “forget” means to let go.

The “four sages” refer to four states of virtue: first, the substance itself; second, outward conduct; third, what is neither substance nor outward conduct; and fourth, what is neither “neither substance” nor “neither outward conduct.” The point is that Yao turned inward to his source and saw through to the realm of the Dao, transcending these four distinctions. That is why the text says he went to visit the four sages.

The sage’s mind is free of attachment. When something calls for a response, he can respond; thus he can govern the many states and bring peace to the world. Though he gathered his spirit in the realm of the four sages and sat motionless, he could at the same time administer all affairs on the northern bank of the Fen. He quietly forgot the world and yet still governed it. This is the coexistence of substance and outward conduct, the union of essence and function, the ability to contemplate both emptiness and being, and the fullness of both action and stillness. Thus Mount Gushe is no different from the northern bank of the Fen, and the mountain forest is no more exceptional than the court.

 黃屋世人齊其所見曷嘗信此耶而馬彪  將四子爲齧缺便未達於遠理劉璋推汾  水於射山更迷惑於近事今所解釋稍異  於斯故郭注云四子者蓋寄言明堯之不  一於堯耳世徒見堯之迹豈識其眞哉 惠子謂莊子曰魏王貽我大瓠之種  䟽姓惠名施宋人也爲梁國相謂語也貽  遺也瓠匏之類也魏王即梁惠王也昔居  安邑國號爲魏後爲强秦所逼徙於大梁  復改爲梁僭號稱王也惠子所以起此大  匏之譬以譏莊子之書雖復詞㫖恢弘而  不切機務故致此詞而更相激發者也 我樹之成而實五石以盛水漿其堅不能自 舉也  䟽樹者藝植之謂也實者子也惠施既得  瓠種藝之成就生子甚大容受五石仍持  此瓠以盛水漿虚脆不堅故不能自勝舉  也 剖之以爲瓢則瓠落無所容非不呺然大也 吾爲其無用而掊之  䟽剖分割之也瓢勺也瓠落平淺也呺然  虚大也掊打破也用而盛水虚脆不能自  勝分剖爲瓢平淺不容多物衆謂无用打  破棄之刺莊子之言不救時要有同此言  應須屛削也 莊子曰夫子固拙於用大矣宋人有善爲不 龜手之藥者世世以洴澼絖爲事  注其藥能令手不拘坼故常漂絮於水中  也  䟽洴浮澼漂也絖絮也世世年也宋人隆  冬涉水漂絮以作牽離手指生瘡拘坼有
Interpretation

People cling to what they have seen with their own eyes. How could they be willing to believe these words? Ma Biao took “the Four” to mean Nie Que, but he still failed to grasp the profound principle. Liu Zhang took “the Fen River” to mean “She Mountain,” and was even more misled by what lay before his eyes. The interpretation given here differs somewhat from theirs. Guo Xiang’s commentary says, “‘The Four’ is a borrowed expression, used to show that Yao was not merely one Yao. People see only Yao’s deeds; how could they know his true nature?”

Huizi said to Zhuangzi, “The King of Wei gave me a seed from a large gourd.”

Huizi, whose given name was Shi, was from the state of Song and once served as chancellor of Liang. “Give” means to present as a gift, and “gourd” refers to a plant of the gourd family. The King of Wei was King Hui of Liang. He had originally lived in Anyi, when his state was called Wei. Later, under pressure from the powerful state of Qin, he moved to Daliang, changed the state’s name to Liang, and called himself king. Huizi brings up the large gourd to mock Zhuangzi’s writings: their language and ideas may be grand, he suggests, but they have no practical application. The two use the example to spur each other into debate.

“I planted the seed, and when it grew, the gourds it produced were as large as five shi. I tried using one to hold water or broth, but its walls were not sturdy enough to support even its own weight.”

Here, “plant” means to cultivate, and “fruit” means the produce of the plant. Huishi received a gourd seed, planted it, and grew gourds large enough to hold five shi of liquid. But the gourd was hollow and fragile, and could not bear the weight when used as a container.

“I split one open to make a dipper, but the gourd shell was so flat and shallow that it could hold very little. It was certainly large enough; it was just hollow and useless. I thought it had no use, so I smashed it.”

“Split” means to cut open, and a “dipper” is a scoop used for lifting things. “Flat and shallow” describes something that is broad and thin, while “hollow and vast” describes something empty and large. “Smash” means to break into pieces. The gourd was too fragile to hold water, and when cut open as a dipper, it was too shallow to hold much. People thought it useless, so they smashed it and threw it away. Huizi uses this example to mock Zhuangzi’s ideas as incapable of solving practical problems of the time, and argues that they too should be discarded.

Zhuangzi said, “You really don’t know how to make use of large things! In the state of Song, there was a man skilled at making a salve that kept hands from cracking in the cold. For generations, his family had made its living washing cotton wadding in water.”

The salve kept the hands from cracking, so the family regularly went into the water to wash cotton wadding.

“Float-washing” means washing by floating the material in water; “rinsing” means washing it through. “Cotton wadding” means loose cotton fibers. “For generations” means passed down from one generation to the next. In the depths of winter, the family from Song went into the water to wash cotton wadding, and their fingers were therefore prone to sores and cracking.

 同龜背故世世相承家傳此藥令其手不  拘坼常得漂絮水中保斯事業永无虧替  又云澼擗也絖䌤也謂之䌤於水之中擗  也 客聞之請買其方百金  䟽金方一寸重一斤爲一金也他國遊客  偶爾聞之請買手瘡一術遂費百金之價  者也 聚族而謀曰我世世爲洴澼絖不過數金今 一朝而鬻技百金請與之  䟽鬻賣也估價既高聚族謀議世世洴澼  爲利蓋寡一朝賣術資貨極多異口同音  僉曰請與 客得之以說吴王越有難吴王使之將冬與 越人水戰大敗越人裂地而封之  䟽吴越北鄰地帶江海丘戈相接必用艫  船戰士隆冬手多拘坼而客素禀雄才天  生睿智既得方術遂說吴王越國兵難侵  吴吴王使爲將帥賴此名藥而兵手不拘  坼旌旗才舉越人亂轍獲此大捷獻凱而  旋勳庸克著胙之茆土 能不龜手一也或以封或不免於洴澼絖則 所用之異也  䟽或不定也方藥无工而用者有殊故行  客得之以封侯宋人用之以洴澼此則所  用工拙之異 今子有五石之瓠何不攄以爲大樽而浮乎 江湖而憂其瓠落无所容則夫子猶有蓬之 心也夫  注蓬非直達者也此章言物各有宜茍得  其宜安往而不逍遥也  䟽攄者繩絡之也樽者漆之如酒樽以繩  結縛用渡江湖南人所謂腰舟者也蓬草
Interpretation

A man from Song treated the recipe as a family treasure. From generation to generation, he passed it down to his family and taught them to use the medicine to protect their hands, so they could rinse silk floss in water without their hands cracking in the cold. In this way, the craft could be passed down for a long time.

“Pi” means to rinse; “pi” means to beat the floss apart; “kuang” refers to silk floss. “Shi” is the process of putting floss in water and beating it apart.

A traveler from another state heard about the recipe and offered a hundred gold pieces for it. In ancient times, one piece of gold was a lump of gold an inch across and weighing one jin. The traveler happened to hear of a medicine for cracked hands and was willing to pay a hundred pieces of gold to buy it.

The man from Song gathered his whole family to discuss the offer. “For generations, we have made our living by rinsing silk floss, earning no more than a few pieces of gold. Now we can get a hundred pieces at once by selling this technique. We should sell it to him.” Everyone agreed.

After buying the recipe, the traveler used it to persuade the king of Wu. When Yue invaded, the king sent him to lead the army into battle. In winter, the armies of Wu and Yue fought on the water, and the army of Wu routed Yue. The king of Wu then awarded the traveler land and a title.

The commentary explains: Wu and Yue were neighboring states, crisscrossed by rivers and sea, so their armies often had to travel by boat. In the bitter cold, soldiers’ hands were prone to cracking. After obtaining the recipe, the traveler used it to win the king of Wu’s confidence and later became a commander. The soldiers of Wu used the medicine, their hands no longer cracked, and they won the naval battle. After the fighting ended, the king of Wu granted the traveler land.

There was only one recipe for preventing hands from cracking in the cold. Yet one man was awarded a fief because of it, while another continued to make a living rinsing silk floss. The difference lay in how the recipe was used.

The commentary explains: “Some” can mean that different people used the recipe in different ways. The recipe itself did not change, but its users put it to different uses. Thus the traveler was granted a fief because of it, while the man from Song continued to use it to rinse silk floss. This shows that the same thing can produce very different results depending on whether it is used skillfully or clumsily.

Now you have a gourd large enough to hold five shi. Why not tie it with ropes and use it as a great float, drifting across rivers and lakes? Instead, you worry that the gourd is too large and that there is nowhere suitable to put it. It seems your mind is still as confined as a patch of mugwort.

The annotation explains: “Peng” refers to mugwort and, by extension, a mind that cannot range freely. The point is that everything has a use suited to it. If you use things appropriately, where could you not roam at ease?

The commentary explains: “Shu” means to tie with a rope. “Zun” means to lacquer something like a wine vessel to make it waterproof, then bind it with ropes to use as a float for crossing rivers and lakes. People in the south call this kind of float a “waist boat.”

 名拳曲不直也夫歎也言大瓠浮汎江湖  可以舟船淪溺至教興行世境可以濟渡  群迷而惠生既有蓬心未能直達玄理故  妄起掊擊之譬譏刺莊子之書爲用失宜  深可歎之 惠子謂莊子曰吾有大樹人謂之樗  䟽樗栲漆之類嗅之甚臭惡木者也世間  名字例皆虚假相與嗅之未知的當故言  人謂之樗也 其大本擁腫而不中繩墨其小枝卷曲而不 中規矩立之塗匠者不顧  䟽擁腫槃癭也卷曲不端直也規圓而矩  方塗道也樗栲之樹不材之木根本擁腫  枝幹攣卷繩墨不加方圓无取立之行路  之旁匠人曾不顧盻也 今子之言大而无用衆所同去也  䟽樹既擁腫不材匠人不顧言迹迂誕无  用衆所不歸此合喻者也 莊子曰子獨不見狸狙乎卑身而伏以候敖 者東西跳梁不避高下中於機辟死於罔罟  䟽狌野猫也跳梁猶走躑也辟法也謂機  關之類也罔罟罝罘也子獨不見狸狙捕  鼠之狀乎卑伏其身伺候慠慢之鼠東西  跳躑不避高下之地而中於機關之法身  死罔罟之中皆以利惑其小不謀大故也  亦猶擎跪曲奉執持聖迹僞情矯性以要  時利前雖遂意後必危亡而商鞅蘇張即  是其事此何異乎捕鼠狸狌死於罔罟也 今夫斄牛其大若垂天之雲此能爲大矣而 不能執鼠  䟽斄牛猶旄牛也出西南夷其形甚大山
Interpretation

“‘Curved and not straight’ means bent rather than straight; ‘alas’ is an expression of lament. Here, a great gourd drifts upon the rivers and lakes and could serve as a boat, yet people have sunk it. The teaching of the Dao arose and spread through the world and could have helped living beings escape delusion and receive its benefits. But Huizi’s mind was closed: he could not directly grasp the subtle principles of the Dao, so he rashly offered the image of striking a gourd to mock Zhuangzi’s writings as useless. This is truly lamentable.

Huizi said to Zhuangzi, ‘I have a great tree that people call the chu (a tree with poor-quality wood).’

The commentary says: The chu is related to trees such as the kao and the lacquer tree. It has a very unpleasant smell and is considered a bad tree by ordinary people. Names in the world are often merely empty labels. Even if everyone smells it, they may not be able to determine exactly what it is. That is why it says, ‘people call it the chu.’

‘Its trunk is gnarled and swollen, so it does not meet the standard of the ink line; its branches twist and bend, so they do not meet the requirements of the compass and square. It grows beside the road, and carpenters do not even look at it.’

The commentary says: ‘Swollen’ means that the trunk is knotted and covered with bulges; ‘twisting’ means it is not straight. The compass draws circles, and the square draws right angles. ‘Roadside’ means beside a road. Trees such as the chu are poor timber: their trunks are knotted and their branches crooked, so they cannot be straightened to the ink line or made into objects with proper circular or square forms. Though it grows by the road, carpenters do not even look at it.

‘Now your words are grand but useless, and no one wants to pay them any attention.’

The commentary says: The tree is knotted and crooked, unfit for use, so carpenters ignore it. The tree is used as a metaphor for Zhuangzi’s words, which are convoluted and absurd, and of no use; therefore, people refuse to accept them.

Zhuangzi said, ‘Have you never seen a wildcat? It crouches low, waiting for a careless, unsuspecting mouse. It darts east and leaps west, paying no heed to high or low, yet it falls into a trap, is caught in a net, and dies.’

The commentary says: ‘Wildcat’ means a wild cat; ‘darting about’ means leaping and running; ‘trap’ refers to devices of that kind; ‘nets’ are gear for catching animals. When a wildcat hunts mice, it crouches low and waits for a careless mouse, then runs and leaps in every direction, heedless of high or low. In the end it falls into a trap and dies in a net. This happens because it covets a small gain close at hand without considering the greater consequences.

This is also like someone who kneels in submission and flatters others, outwardly honoring the words and conduct of sages but inwardly acting insincerely and distorting their own nature in pursuit of immediate advantage and opportunity. Even if such a person prospers for a time, they will eventually fall into danger and ruin. Shang Yang, Su Qin, and Zhang Yi were examples of this. How is this any different from the wildcat hunting mice and finally dying in a net?

‘Now consider the yak. It is as huge as a cloud hanging at the edge of the sky. It is indeed immense, but it cannot be used to catch mice.’

The commentary says: The yak is also called the maoniu. It is native to the southwestern frontier regions and is extremely large.

 中遠望如天際之雲藪澤之中逍遥養性  跳梁投鼠不及野狸亦猶莊子之言不狎  流俗可以理國治身且長且乆者也 今子有大樹患其无用何不樹之於无何有 之鄉廣莫之野  䟽无何有猶无有也莫无也謂寬曠无人  之處不問何物悉皆无有故曰无何有之  鄉也 彷徨乎无爲其側逍遥乎寢卧其下  䟽彷徨縱任之名逍遥自得之稱亦是異  言一致互有文耳不材之木枝葉茂盛婆  娑蔭映蔽日來風故行李經過徘徊憩息  徙倚顧歩寢卧其下亦猶莊子之言无爲  虚淡可以逍遥適性䕃庇蒼生也 不夭斤斧物无害者无所可用安所困苦哉  注夫小大之物苟失其極則利害之理均  用得其所則物皆逍遥也  䟽擁腫不材拳曲无取匠人不顧斤斧无  加夭折之灾何從而至故得終其天年盡  其生理无用之用何所困苦哉亦猶莊子  之言乖俗會道可以攝衛可以全眞既不  夭枉於世
Interpretation

Seen from afar, it looks like a cloud on the horizon. Amid lakes and marshes, one can freely nurture one’s nature.

A cat that leaps to pounce on a mouse cannot compare with a wildcat. This is just as Zhuangzi says: by keeping clear of worldly conventions, one can govern the state and cultivate oneself in accord with principle, and live a long life.

Now suppose you have a great tree and worry that it is useless. Why not plant it where nothing is—on the vast, open wilderness?

“Nowhere at all” means “where nothing exists”; “nothing” means “absence.” Here it refers to a broad, open place without people. Since nothing of any kind is there, it is called the “realm of nowhere at all.”

You can stroll freely beside it and lie at ease beneath it.

“Wander freely” means to stroll as one pleases; “at ease” means to feel content and unconstrained. The two expressions convey the same idea in different words. Though this tree is not fit for timber, its branches and leaves grow thickly, their shadows swaying as they screen the sun and block the wind. Passersby can linger beneath it, rest, lean against it, or lie down. As Zhuangzi says, through Wuwei (non-action), emptiness, stillness, and detachment, one can live freely and at ease. The tree’s shade, too, shelters all living things.

It will not be felled by an axe or harmed by external forces. Since it has no use, what hardship could it face?

【Note】Whether great or small, when things lose their own nature, benefit and harm become indistinguishable. When each thing finds its proper place, all things can live freely and at ease.

The tree’s trunk is swollen and its branches crooked, so it does not meet a carpenter’s standards for timber. The carpenter therefore pays it no heed, and no one will fell it with an axe. How, then, could it suffer the calamity of being cut down before its time? Thus it can enjoy its full lifespan and complete the course of its life. There is use within uselessness; what hardship could it face? This is just as Zhuangzi says: going against worldly opinions while accord­ing with the Great Dao can preserve body and mind and safeguard one’s nature. Since it will not suffer disaster among people, how could it be troubled by its allotted fate?

Annotations and Commentary on the True Classic of Southern Florescence, volume one.

塗詎肯困苦於生分也 南華眞經注䟽卷之一

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0139); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

Vol. 2 →