中文 · EN

《通玄真經(二)》Vol. 5

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 5 / 7 7,906 characters

About this page. The original text of 《通玄真經(二)》 Vol. 5 (Dongshen 洞神部, 7 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 16 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《通玄真經(二)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

通玄眞經卷之五(寳五)     (宋宣義郎試大理寺主薄兼/括州縉雲縣令朱弁正儀注)    道德篇(夫道也者通自分之常理也/德也者備所得之總名也且)    (文子總有一十二篇之目各異唯道/德再舉者何也夫道德之道也即可)    (物之道也由可道而成德者亦可據/之德也但非至道與玄德爾所以首)    (篇道原後篇上德原稱道本上乃德/極唯原上之用兹一篇唯道德之體)    (各歸本自然人間之世行道立德修/身核名生且有倫死而不朽者莫若)    (此篇/耳) 文子問道夫道絶學至理無問斯所問者蓋 觸類之道也老子曰學問不精即聽道不深 人之學者欲復其性也因好問而成待間假 修學以至無學若不精於此何窮深㫖矣凡 聽者將以達智達聖哲也智將以成行也成 仁義之行將以致功名也致同佐之功不精 不明不深不達精則明深則達故上學以神 聽中學以心聽下學以耳聽上學體道以達 智中學好道以成行下學游道以至名也以 耳聽者學在皮膚以心聽者學在肌肉以神 聽者學在骨髓淺深比也故聽之不深即知 之不明知之不明即不能盡其精不能盡其 精即行之不誠聽彼不深則無今知之明斯 未造其極者也夫未明於中行誠於外者未 之聞也凡聽之理虛心清靜損氣無盛謂損
Interpretation

This scripture explores the fundamental nature of Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue/Power), as well as the methods for comprehending the Great Dao through different levels of learning. The text states:

Dao and De constitute the fundamental principle that permeates all things (Dao) and its concrete manifestations (De). When Wenzi (a prominent Daoist figure) inquired about the meaning of Dao from Laozi, the latter replied that the true Dao represents the supreme truth unattainable through ordinary learning. While people study to recover their original nature, superficial knowledge cannot reveal the profound meaning of Dao.

The text classifies the comprehension of Dao into three ascending levels: the highest involves spiritual realization (Shen), the intermediate employs mental understanding, and the basic relies on auditory learning. Mere listening yields superficial knowledge, mental understanding grasps substantial content, while spiritual realization touches the essential core. The shallower the comprehension, the more obscure the understanding becomes; the more obscure the understanding, the less sincere the practice.

Laozi emphasizes that genuine comprehension of Dao requires maintaining inner emptiness and stillness, eliminating distracting thoughts and restless Qi (vital energy). Only in this state can one progressively master Dao: beginning with worldly achievements (lower learning), advancing through moral cultivation (middle learning), and ultimately attaining wisdom (higher learning). Without profound learning, one cannot reach the highest realm; without true inner realization, outward actions cannot manifest sincerity.

(Note: "Wenzi" refers to the Warring States period Daoist master; "Laozi" is Li Er, founder of Daoism; "Shang De" denotes supreme virtue, while "Xuan De" signifies profound and mysterious virtue)

其氣以處道無思無慮目無妄俔耳無苟聽 内外各息所能事奉彼之㫖也專精積蓄内 意盈并既以得之必固守之必長乆之專一 所得意無分想則明納理本盡其精妙自然 物不能遷與時俱精矣夫道者原産有始肇 生有形始於柔弱成於剛强始夫道母氣皆 柔弱成乎形質性乃剛强始於寡短成於衆 長生生故不寡是以衆也資生故不短是以 長也十圍之木始於把百仞之臺始於下此 天之道也聖人法之夫道以包小爲大天以 配下爲高察始察成可尚微本故聖人法之 也卑者所以自下也禮下之卑退者所以自 後也持後之退儉者所以自小也小足之儉 損者所以自少也少欲之損卑即尊親下故 尊退即先不犯故先儉即廣是用故廣損即 大成德故大此天道所成也天道虧盈益謙 聖人則之自然成其衆利夫道者德之先因 乎道體方成德用大之根兩儀宗本福之門 安靜之由萬物待之而生待之而成待之而 寧皆假無以爲耳夫道無爲無形不爲事先 不爲物迹内以修身外以治人功成事立與 天爲鄰夫用道者内可以修身外可以治人 而所濟無迹皆若自然則與天之功未始相 速也無爲而無不爲此義已見道原篇莫知 其精其精甚眞其中有信隨感而至得非信 乎天子有道即天下服長有社稷道也者隨
Interpretation

This passage expounds on the characteristics and functions of the Dao (the Way), and how to cultivate oneself and govern the state by following celestial principles.

It first describes the state of Dao cultivation: one's Qi (vital energy) flows smoothly, the Shen (spirit) remains pure, without random thoughts, eyes not gazing indiscriminately, ears not listening carelessly. Maintaining internal and external purity while concentrating on accumulating inner cultivation. Upon comprehending the true meaning of the Dao, one must steadfastly preserve it with prolonged focus. A mind free from distractions can perceive fundamental truths and grasp subtle principles, thus becoming impervious to external disturbances, progressing steadily over time.

The text explains the nature of the Dao: as the origin of all things, it initially manifests without form or substance, later giving rise to concrete phenomena. Like tender saplings growing into towering trees, or lofty platforms being built from foundations - this reflects natural laws. Sages emulate this pattern: the great Dao becomes vast by encompassing small things, heaven appears lofty by covering what lies below.

It then discusses principles for worldly conduct: humility earns respect, yielding prevents conflict, frugality accumulates wealth, reducing desires cultivates great De (Virtue/Power). These all result from emulating celestial principles, as the Dao of Heaven invariably diminishes the excessive and supplements the modest.

Finally, it elaborates the relationship between Dao and De: Dao is the root of De, while De manifests Dao. The formless, Wuwei (non-action) Dao accomplishes all things. Those who apply the Dao can cultivate themselves internally and govern people externally, achieving accomplishments naturally aligned with celestial principles. The subtle essence of Dao truly exists, revealing itself through resonance. Should the Son of Heaven practice the Dao, all under heaven would submit, ensuring enduring state prosperity. The Dao operates according to natural laws, never through forced human effort.

(Note: "Two Modes" refers to Yin-Yang; "Origins of Dao Chapter" is another section from the Tongxuan Zhenjing scripture)

位分而各通也故堯舜有之則至德可偁湯 武有之則神功不朽可道之道斯非謂歟諸 侯有道即人民和睦不失其國古者諸侯有 國士庶有道即全其身保其親强大有道不 戰而剋夫晋楚之類有道者霸非在料敵而 剋小弱有道不爭而得曹衛之類有道者附 亦非率先而得也舉事有道功成得福順於 時者功必見修於正者福必應君臣有道即 忠惠君惠臣忠父子有道即慈孝父慈子孝 士庶有道即相愛無相奪倫理自容愛故有 道即和無道即苛夫各正性命則異俗可和 苟踰位分則骨肉自虐而有家有國不本道 者不其殆哉由是觀之道之於人無所不宜 也小大之用皆可夫道者小行之小德福大 行之大德福盡行之天下服服即懷之隨器 而受酌焉不竭夫能盡是道者天下執不歸 之也故帝者天下適之也王者天下往之也 適往一也皆歸德之辭然適者通謂性命之 所安往者不得已就耳取其會理優劣乃殊 天下不適不往不可謂帝王有位而無德非 此宜也故帝王者不得人不能成得人失道 亦不能守既因兆人以成其位則獨任於己 其可守乎夫失道者奢泰驕佚慢倨矜傲見 餘自顯執雄堅强作難結怨爲兵主爲辭首 此舉失道之狀小人行之身受大殃以至於 刑戮耳大人行之家國滅亡侯伯失國卿大
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the fundamental importance of the Dao (the Way) across all social strata, contrasting the consequences of aligning with or deviating from its principles.

For rulers, when ancient sage-kings like Yao and Shun followed the Dao, they attained supreme virtue (De); when founders like King Tang of Shang and King Wu of Zhou adhered to it, they established enduring dynasties. Feudal lords who embody the Dao bring harmony to their people and stability to their states, while commoners who practice it safeguard themselves and their families. Powerful nations embracing the Dao achieve victory without warfare—as seen when Jin and Chu dominated the feudal system through Dao alignment rather than military stratagems. Weak states practicing the Dao gain protection without contention, exemplified by Cao and Wei securing survival through submission to stronger allies, not through preemptive action.

Affairs conducted according to the Dao bring success and blessings. Those who synchronize with cosmic timing witness tangible results; cultivators of orthodox paths receive tangible rewards. Between ruler and minister, the Dao manifests as benevolent leadership and loyal service; between father and son, as parental kindness and filial devotion; among common folk, as mutual care that preserves social bonds. Harmony flourishes where the Dao is honored, while harshness prevails where it is neglected.

The text emphasizes that when individuals abide by their inherent roles and natural dispositions, diverse customs coexist peacefully. Transgressing these boundaries breeds conflict even among blood relatives. Governing households or states without Dao as foundation courts grave peril.

The Dao's applicability is universal—effective in matters great and small: limited practice yields modest blessings, extensive cultivation brings abundant rewards, and complete embodiment commands universal allegiance. True emperors attract voluntary submission from all under heaven; genuine kings draw spontaneous allegiance. Where neither voluntary submission nor spontaneous allegiance exists, rulership remains nominal—a position devoid of true virtue (De).

The scripture concludes by warning that those who lose the Dao become extravagant, arrogant, contentious, and trouble-making. Commoners thus afflicted invite personal calamity or punishment; the powerful court familial or national ruin; feudal lords forfeit territories; ministers lose their offices.

夫即亡家也淺及其身深及子孫故罪莫大 於無道怨莫深於無德天道然也無道者逆 于天無德者暴於物理爲罪怨之首耳 老子曰夫行道者使人雖勇刺之不入雖巧 擊之不中夫能制彼氣敵善應機端道者之 中蓋有此小術之用夫刺之不入擊之不中 而猶辱也雖不我傷而能攻辱亦皆已顯矣 未若使人雖勇不敢刺雖巧不敢擊謙柔自 守則勇所未陵出處無機則巧者不及夫不 敢者非無其意也未能使彼之無意未若使 人本無其意將無屈奇之服詭異之行浩然 無得與彼同波則天下之人何意加此也夫 無其意者未有愛利之心也未能使彼之心 而反愛利於我不若使天下丈夫女子莫不 歡然皆欲愛利之夫道者之功極則天下攸 歸物得而利故雖縣解外患亦未足偁爲以 反同衆流游雜庶類以我爲利愛之主待我 於性命之場我無所存將自化妙可言其至 矣若然者無地而爲君無官而爲長天下莫 不願安利之自昆蟲已上莫非願就利者故 不待位地而可君長天下故勇於敢即殺勇 於不敢即活也勇於擊刺者心殺於彼勇於 柔弱者道活於物矣 文子問德老子曰畜之養之遂之長之兼利 無擇與天地合此謂之德夫人之生也形與 物接心與事交固不可暫無損益於外矣唯 内忘愛惡迹絶利害則能御羣物而不抑涉
Interpretation

When a person loses their ancestral foundation, it may seem to affect only themselves on the surface, but in reality, it brings calamity upon descendants. Thus the greatest transgression is defying the Dao of Heaven, and the deepest resentment stems from the loss of De (Virtue/Power) – this is determined by natural law. To oppose the Dao of Heaven is to act against nature's course; to lose De is to harm all beings – these are the roots of sin and resentment.

Laozi said that those who truly attain the Dao remain unharmed even when facing fierce attackers – blades cannot pierce them, nor can skilled opponents injure them. This comes from mastering the method of controlling Qi (vital energy) and adapting to circumstances, a minor ability of Dao cultivators. Yet even being invulnerable to weapons still means being violated. Though the body remains unharmed, the act of attack itself constitutes an insult. Better to make others, though courageous, dare not strike; though skilled, dare not assault. Maintain a humble and gentle demeanor, and the brave will naturally refrain from aggression; act without revealing weaknesses, and the cunning will find no openings.

This "daring not" doesn't mean the other completely lacks harmful intent, but that their malice isn't fully eliminated. The highest state makes others not even conceive malice: wear no strange garments, commit no eccentric acts, be open and natural in harmonious coexistence – why would anyone in the world wish to harm you? When people harbor no malice, they naturally won't have self-interested desires for gain. Rather than forcing superficial compliance, better to make all people sincerely admire and follow you.

The highest achievement of Dao practitioners is making all things return to and benefit from them. Even temporarily removing external threats isn't worth boasting about. What truly matters is blending into the multitude, harmonizing with all kinds of people, becoming someone beloved who naturally governs life's domain. Without deliberate pursuit, everything nurtures itself spontaneously – this realm is marvelously ineffable. Those who attain it become rulers without territory, leaders without official titles. All under heaven desire their protection and grace; even tiny creatures wish to draw near. Thus one can guide the world without relying on authority.

Those courageous in displaying strength invite fatal disaster; those courageous in showing weakness preserve their lives. Attackers are already dominated by murderous intent; those who dare appear weak find the great Dao flourishing endlessly among all things.

Wenzi asked about the meaning of De. Laozi replied: Nurturing all beings, helping them grow, impartially benefiting without favoritism, merging with heaven and earth's natural harmony – this is De. In human life, our forms contact external objects, our minds perceive worldly affairs, inevitably influenced by surroundings. Only by transcending love and hatred within, acting without involvement in gain or loss, can one command all things without being oppressed.

萬方而成化苟非此道利不兼焉能使乎物 得以宜夫加暴則各失全性之惠豈合德於 一儀也何謂仁曰爲上不矜其功爲下不羞 其病未能退於大不矜於小不偷兼愛無私 乆而不衰此之謂仁非夫至性安可乆而不 衰故賢聖難之以稱五教之首也何謂義曰 爲上即輔弱爲下即守節達不肆意窮不易 操一度順理不私枉撓此之謂義理正也一 常也順正以爲常度不容私撓乃可存終矣 何謂禮曰爲上即恭嚴爲下即卑敬退讓守 柔爲天下雌立於不敢設於不能此之爲禮 所謂内和外飾非止揖讓登降也故修其德 即下從令修其仁即下不爭修其義即下平 正修其禮即下尊敬四者即修國家安定故 物生者道也長者德也愛者仁也正者義也 敬者禮也不畜不養不能遂長不慈不愛不 能成遂不正不匡不能乆長不敬不寵不能 貴重故德者民之所貴也德能安之天下莫 不貴其安全者也仁者民之所懷也物情莫 不歸其惠愛耳義者民之所畏也方割無私 莫不畏正禮者民之所敬也威儀叙列莫不 敬奉此四者文之順也聖人之所以御萬物 也若非正順於人文則萬情多端不可驅御 矣君子無德即下怨以抑其性故怨無仁即 下爭以無所惠故爭無義即下暴以踰我分 故暴無禮即下亂以失常叙故亂四經不立
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the core ethical concepts of Daoism—benevolence (ren), righteousness (yi), propriety (li), and virtue (de)—along with their social functions.

Regarding "benevolence": Those in high positions should not boast of their achievements, while those in low positions should not feel ashamed of their shortcomings. True benevolence manifests when one yields in significant matters without belittling trivial ones, showing equal care for all without partiality, maintaining this quality unwaveringly. Only those with the purest innate nature can sustain this state permanently. Thus, ancient sages placed benevolence at the forefront of the five cardinal teachings.

Concerning "righteousness": Those in authority should support the weak, while subordinates must uphold their integrity. When prosperous, one should not become indulgent; when in adversity, one must not alter moral principles. Persistently following the right path without distorting principles due to personal bias constitutes righteousness. It means adhering to correct principles as constant standards, allowing no selfish interference, thereby achieving proper beginnings and endings.

On "propriety": Leaders should be reverent and meticulous, while followers ought to be humble and observe decorum. Yielding while maintaining gentleness, willingly occupying the world's most yielding position, and preserving an attitude of never presuming to take precedence—this is the essence of propriety. Propriety is not merely about formal rituals of bowing and yielding but represents the unity of inner harmony and outward expression.

Regarding their collective function: When rulers cultivate virtue (de), the people obey commands; when they nurture benevolence (ren), conflicts cease; when they uphold righteousness (yi), fairness prevails; when they practice propriety (li), respect flourishes. Perfecting these four aspects ensures national stability.

All things depend on the Dao (natural law) for growth, on virtue (de) for development, on benevolence for care, on righteousness for rectification, and on propriety for reverence. Without nourishment, growth is impossible; without compassion, fulfillment cannot be achieved; without correction, longevity is unattainable; without respect, importance cannot be gained.

Virtue (de) is cherished by the people because it brings stability; benevolence (ren) is remembered because all beings inherently yearn for care; righteousness (yi) is revered because impartial justice commands awe; propriety (li) is honored because dignified demeanor inspires respect. These four principles form the foundation of civilized society—the very means by which sages govern all things. Deviation from these orthodox principles leads to rampant selfish desires that become unmanageable.

Should rulers lack virtue, the people will resent oppression; without benevolence, they will fight over unmet needs; without righteousness, they will turn violent amid lost standards; without propriety, chaos will ensue from lost order. Failure to establish these four fundamental principles results in social turmoil.

謂之無道不亡者未之有也 老子曰至德之世賈便其市農樂其野大夫 安其職處士修其道民人樂其業是以風雨 不毁折草木不夭死德被於物故陰陽和合 動植各遂其生河出圖洛出書及世之衰也 賦斂無度殺戮無止刑諫者殺賢士是以山 崩川涸蠕動不息野無百蔬毒流蒸人下結 煩怨之氣氣能逆天戾常故生灾饉之變故 世治即愚者不得獨亂世亂即賢者不能獨 治賢愚之功未能加於時也故聖人和愉寧 靜生也末嘗憂躁以虧性分志得道行命也 以能知命故窮達皆安故生遭命而後能行 命得時而後能明命遇則道行時宜則功著 必有其世而後有其人時無明王則聖賢無 措其乎足故九守篇曰非有其世孰能濟焉 文子問聖智老子曰聞而知之聖也見而知 之智也心見者聖目見者智故聖人常聞禍 福所生而擇其道擇平靜之道而守之則無 因以爲朕兆智者常見禍福成形而擇其行 擇正慎之行而修之則能預杜萌漸聖人知 天道吉凶故知禍福所生聖人知不足者吉 有餘者凶皆禍福之所由矣故平靜以守之 不爲先始也智者先見成形故知禍福之門 智者不惑於萌盛故免乎奄忽而至聞未生 聖也先見成形智也無聞見者愚也 老子曰君好知即信時而任己棄數而用思 謂信所愚之時因以爲已知棄必然之數而
Interpretation

In the Tongxuan Zhenjing (Scripture of Pervading Mystery), Laozi states: "There has never been a state that, being devoid of the Dao in its governance, did not eventually perish."

During eras when Dao and De flourish, merchants conduct business peacefully in the markets, farmers joyfully till their fields, officials fulfill their duties conscientiously, recluses devote themselves to cultivation, and the common people live in contentment. Thus winds and rains come seasonably, plants grow naturally, all beings receive blessings, Yin and Yang harmonize, and living creatures thrive. The Yellow River reveals auspicious diagrams while the Luo River manifests mystical writings (ancient signs believed to portend universal peace). But when the world declines, rulers impose exorbitant taxes and endless executions, those who dare remonstrate are slain, and the worthy suffer persecution. Then mountains crumble, rivers run dry, locusts swarm, fields lie waste, noxious vapors spread, and popular grievances accumulate. Such grievances can disrupt cosmic order, bringing famine and calamity.

In peaceful times, fools cannot alone create chaos; in chaotic times, sages cannot alone restore order. The actions of both wise and foolish are constrained by their era. Therefore, sages maintain their serene nature, never damaging their innate disposition through anxiety or agitation. Understanding destiny, they remain equanimous whether in hardship or prosperity. One must first comprehend destiny to master it, and meet the right moment to fulfill one's mission. Only when encountering enlightened rulers can sages realize their aspirations. As the "Nine Preservations" chapter states: "Without the proper era, who can accomplish great deeds?"

Wenzi inquired about the difference between sages and the wise. Laozi replied: "Those who understand through hearing are sages; those who understand through seeing are the wise. Sages foresee the roots of fortune and misfortune, choosing the correct path. By holding to tranquility, they prevent troubles before they arise. The wise discern fortune and misfortune only when signs appear, then act through upright caution to cultivate themselves and contain disasters. Sages know Heaven's auspicious and inauspicious patterns, understanding that 'contentment brings constant joy while greed invites calamity'—these being the roots of fortune and misfortune. Thus they preserve the Dao through stillness, never rushing ahead presumptuously. The wise perceive omens first, thereby grasping fortune and misfortune's pivots, remaining unswayed by superficial prosperity to avoid sudden disasters. To foresee what has not yet occurred is sagely; to detect emerging signs is wise—those lacking both are foolish."

Laozi further said: "When rulers esteem cleverness, they become superstitious about timing and self-willed, abandoning natural law to rely on personal schemes. This is believing in chance while being self-opinionated—discarding inevitable principles to depend solely on subjective thought."

用思所及者也物博智淺以淺贍博未之有 也獨任其智失必多矣物宜多端智有涯極 故不能贍以至多失好知窮術也好勇危亡 之道也必窮之術必亡之道好與即無定分 以其好故不定上之分不定即下之望無止 君上錫賫無度臣下希冀無已若多斂即與 民爲讎重賦斂則反樂推之道故怨之始讎 少取而多與其數無有十一而稅則不給無 恒之用故好與來怨之道也不均於土則庶 官怨重賦於民則卒士怨由是觀之財不足 任道術可因明矣 文子問曰古之王者以道涖天下爲之奈何 老子曰執一無爲因天地與之變化執一者 謂無所執也無爲者言不敢爲也夷如是則 循彼性而治之得非因天地之所宜而與萬 物同變化天下大器也不可執也不可爲也 爲者敗之執者失之能爲一事必敗於萬物 之事能執一性必失於萬類之性也執一者 見小也不載纖芥之能豈非謙小見小故能 成其大且無所載因彼而成則無之不通反 成大治無爲者守靜也不先動之謂也守靜 故能爲天下正夫好動者傷物性也故大順 天下與化推移則物有所宜各性而自正矣 處大滿而無溢居高貴而無驕見小守靜故 無驕溢處大不溢盈而不虧居上不驕高而 不危夫道然也盈而不虧所以長守富也高 而不危所以長守貴也富貴不離其身禄及
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses principles of governance and self-cultivation, presented in two parts:

The first section warns against overreliance on human ingenuity. Human wisdom has limits, while the transformations of phenomena are boundless. Relying solely on personal stratagems inevitably leads to repeated errors. Obsession with political maneuvering results in dead ends, while glorifying military force invites destruction. Arbitrary rewards create inequitable distribution—when superiors lack consistent standards, subordinates become insatiable. A ruler's unrestrained generosity breeds endless demands from ministers. Excessive taxation breeds public resentment, while oppressive levies lose the people's hearts. Insufficient revenue leaves the state impoverished, uneven allocation angers officials, and heavy conscription demoralizes soldiers. Thus governance cannot rely on material resources alone—it requires proper methods.

The second part, through a dialogue between Wenzi and Laozi, expounds the governing philosophy of "holding to the One through Wuwei (non-action)." "Holding to the One" means aligning with nature's flow without rigid opinions, while "Wuwei" means avoiding forceful interference. Like channeling water by following its nature, one must adapt alongside all things according to cosmic patterns. The world resembles a vast vessel—attempting to forcibly control it guarantees failure. Those skilled in one specialty fail when facing myriad phenomena; those fixated on particular qualities inevitably lose comprehension of the whole. Truly "holding to the One" appears modest in capability yet achieves greatness through humble inclusiveness. "Wuwei" means maintaining tranquility without proactive disturbance—only through stillness can one become the world's compass. Restlessness harms the innate nature of things, while harmonizing with natural transformations allows all beings to fulfill their proper places.

The conclusion emphasizes balanced wisdom: remaining full without overflowing, occupying high positions without pride. By understanding subtle principles and maintaining serenity, one avoids arrogance and excess. Such is the Great Dao (the Way): brimming yet never depleted, thus maintaining lasting abundance; lofty yet never precarious, thus preserving enduring nobility. When cultivated thus, wealth and honor endure, with blessings and prosperity following naturally.

子孫古之王道期於此矣唯上此道可立天 下也 老子曰民有道所同行有法所同守皆慕義 道而懼典法義不能相固威不能相必故立 君以一之民不能永固所義專必所畏故立 君以齊一之也君執一即治無常即亂亂生 於無恒之政也君道者非所以有爲也所以 無爲也治道貴靜豈先物爲因民爲而化之 亦非以爲也智者不以德爲事以政治之德 爲己之能事者非君上之智也勇者不以力 爲暴以威勢之力而爲暴雷者非人君之勇 也仁者不以位爲惠以露天日之位而爲己 惠者非王者之仁也可謂一矣備此三者乃 謂執一一也者無適之道也萬物之本也清 靜守一動而不知萬物宗本不出於是君數 易法國數易君數易法度民不堪命國之無 本君能乆乎人以其位達其好憎下之徑衢 不可勝理天子恃尊以位不約所欲任達好 憎之性因成取舍之私法令滋彰下多岐路 不可勝理也故君失一其亂甚於無君夫無 君之時猶義以相扶咸以相服以其不能固 乃立主之今君反爲亂階則不如無君矣君 必執一而後能羣矣 文子問曰王道有幾老子曰一而己矣得一 而已文子曰古有以道王者有以兵王者何 其一也曰以道王者德也以兵王者亦德也 上以道得下以義得用兵有五有義兵有應
Interpretation

The fundamental principle by which ancient sage-kings governed the world lies precisely here—only by following this Great Dao can the order of heaven and earth be established.

Laozi said: When the common people collectively follow the Dao (the fundamental law of the universe), their conduct naturally conforms to proper measures. People yearn for moral principles yet fear laws, because relying solely on morality cannot endure, nor can intimidation maintain lasting restraint. Thus rulers are needed to provide unified governance. Since the people cannot permanently uphold morality or maintain reverent focus, sovereigns are established to provide unified standards. When the ruler grasps the "One" (the fundamental principle), the state becomes well-ordered; losing the constant Dao brings chaos, and disorder stems precisely from governance without constant standards.

True statecraft lies not in deliberate action but in accordance with natural spontaneity. The essence of governance values tranquility and wuwei (non-action)—not racing ahead of events, but guiding and teaching by following the people's needs. The wise never use virtue as political achievement—those who flaunt their virtue as capability lack a ruler's wisdom; the courageous never employ violence—those who bully people with power lack a ruler's true courage; the benevolent never bestow favors through authority—those who exploit the Son of Heaven's position for personal gain lack a king's true benevolence. Only by unifying these three can one be said to have grasped the "One"—this "One" being the omnipresent Great Dao, the source of all things. Maintain stillness to preserve the root, and in action you'll naturally accord with all things' patterns.

When laws are frequently altered and rulers frequently replaced, the people become overwhelmed. If rulers indulge their preferences based on position, chaos spreads below. When the Son of Heaven, relying on his exalted status, fails to restrain desires and acts according to whims, partiality takes form. The more intricate the laws become, the more deviant paths emerge below. Thus when rulers lose the standard of "One," the resulting disorder surpasses that of having no ruler at all. Without rulers, people can still support and trust one another; it was precisely because this couldn't last that rulers were established. If rulers instead become sources of chaos, it would be better to have no rulers at all. Rulers must grasp the fundamental principle of "One" to truly lead the people.

Wenzi (a Daoist figure) asked: How many varieties of the Kingly Way exist? Laozi replied: Only one. Wenzi pressed: In ancient times some governed through the Dao, others ruled through military force—why say there's only one? Laozi explained: Governing through the Dao relies on De (Virtue/Power), and ruling through force also depends on De. Those above attain all under heaven through the Dao; those below win the people's hearts through righteousness. Military force divides into five types: there are armies of righteousness, armies of retaliation... (the subsequent discussion on military principles remains incomplete)

兵有忿兵有貪兵有驕兵誅暴拯弱謂之義 敵來加己不得己而用之謂之應爭小故故 事不勝其心謂之忿利人土地欲人財貨謂 之貪恃其國家之大矜其人民之衆欲見賢 於敵國者謂之驕義兵王合天下心故王應 兵勝以其後動故勝忿兵敗小不勝忍故敗 貪兵死不能自守故死驕兵滅盈反天道故 滅此天道然也 老子曰釋道而任智者危棄數而用才者困 釋捨也數天之常數也凡捨道任智則靡日 可安棄數用才則劣而莫濟矣故守分循理 失之不憂得之不喜成者非所爲也得者非 所求也夫守自道之分循必然之理者適委 天命靜安所遇雖成之與得付在偶然故無 憂喜關其内也入者有受而無取出者有授 而無與懷道以容萬類則雖有受非食取也 抱德以施羣品則雖有授非私與也因春而 生因秋而殺所生不得所殺不怨即幾於道 矣忘情於中順時行令豈容德怨於中間哉 文子問曰王天下得其歡心爲之柰何老子 曰若江海是已謙而不溢容而不擇可謂歸 萬物之道盡羣下之心也淡兮無味用之不 既虚靜淡泊而應之無盡也先小而後大先 以善下之小後成深廣之大夫欲上人者必 以其言下之欲先人者必以其身後之天下 必效其歡愛凡由下致上持後取先蓋順天 而成物之所與則歡愛之道自得彼之誠也
Interpretation

This scripture expounds on two major principles: the Dao (Way) of military strategy and the Dao of governing a state and cultivating oneself.

Regarding warfare, the text identifies four types of armies: righteous armies (yibing), responsive armies (yingbing), wrathful armies (fenbing), and greedy armies (tanbing). Armies mobilized to overthrow tyrants and rescue the oppressed are called righteous armies; those forced to counter invading enemies are responsive armies; those acting on petty disputes due to uncontrolled anger are wrathful armies; those coveting others' lands and wealth are greedy armies. Righteous armies win popular support and thus can become rulers; responsive armies prevail by striking after the enemy attacks; wrathful armies fail by lacking restraint in minor matters; greedy armies perish by being unable to hold their gains; arrogant armies collapse by defying the Heavenly Dao (Tian Dao). These are all natural laws.

Concerning statecraft and self-cultivation, Laozi states that abandoning the Great Dao (fundamental principle) to rely on cleverness is perilous, while discarding celestial patterns (natural laws) to act based on talent leads to predicaments. One should maintain fundamental integrity and follow heavenly principles, remaining unmoved by gain or loss. True achievement is not attained through forced pursuit, nor is genuine attainment obtained through coercion. Like the four seasons in their cycles—spring's growth and autumn's harvest—those who benefit feel no gratitude, and those who perish bear no resentment. This is how one approaches the Dao. One must dissolve personal attachments and act in harmony with celestial timing.

Wenzi (a Daoist figure) asked how to win the hearts of all under heaven. Laozi replied: Be like rivers and seas—humble without arrogance, inclusive without discrimination. Remain tranquil and empty, yet capable of responding infinitely. To stand above others, first let your words be humble; to lead others, first place your own interests behind. Thus, people will naturally cherish you. This method—attaining nobility through humility and advancing by retreating—is the path of aligning with the Heavenly Dao (Tian Dao) and accomplishing all things. Sincerely practicing this will naturally garner devotion.

進其仁義而無苛氣居上而民不重居前而 衆不害天下樂推而不厭雖絶國殊俗蜎飛 蠕動莫不親愛夫理順於正物就其愛然以 仁愛義正則殊俗異類知有所親欣戴樂推 而無猒也無之而不通無往而不遂故爲天 下貴執此道者有前無括旁通皆可得非天 下之貴乎 老子曰執一世之法籍以非傳代之俗譬猶 膠柱而調瑟也五音合變以成文百代合宜 而制法調之在變不可膠柱治之在宜不可 執法聖人者應時偶變見形施宜斯不膠執 之謂世異即事變時移即俗易論世而立法 隨時而舉事兆庶情偽風俗不一帝王質文 世有損益立事與時非聖者孰能盡哉上古 之王法度不同非故相反也時務異也是故 不法其已成之法而法其所以爲法所以爲 法者與化推移也已成之法如已祭天祝地 一時之用奚可格哉唯因化推移以爲法者 不可不法也聖人之法可觀也其所以作法 不可原也法施於外則可觀睹權在於内不 可原究也其言可聽也其所以言不可形也 法度之言則可傳聽而立意之由固難顯著 矣三皇五帝輕天下細萬物齊死生同變化 遺位而忘懐一遇而大順抱道推誠以鏡萬 物之情道法誠明故可通鑒上與道爲友下 與化爲人往復皆道道友己也動靜在化化 治於人也今欲學其道不得其清明未俗清
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how governance and personal conduct should adapt to changing circumstances rather than rigidly adhering to dogma.

A truly benevolent ruler implements humane governance without oppressing the people. Though occupying a lofty position, the masses feel no burden; though leading the way, none are harmed. Thus all under heaven gladly support such a ruler—even distant lands with different customs, down to the smallest creatures, feel affection. By aligning with the Dao and practicing benevolence, even culturally distinct groups instinctively recognize such leadership as worthy of reverence.

Those who master this art of governance act without obstruction, earning universal respect. This method proves universally applicable, capable of responding to all situations—is this not the most precious wisdom?

The text then employs a zither-tuning metaphor: Clinging to the legal codes of one era to negate customs passed down through generations is like gluing the tuning pegs in place (note: fixed pegs cannot adjust pitch). Just as the five tones require variation and harmony to create music, each dynasty must establish laws according to actual conditions. The essence of governance lies in adapting to the times, not stubborn adherence. Sages take appropriate measures according to changing circumstances—this is true flexibility.

Times change, affairs transform, and customs evolve. Laws should be established according to contemporary realities, actions aligned with current trends. As people's temperaments vary and customs differ, imperial governance must adjust accordingly. The legal systems of ancient sage-kings all differed—not from deliberate opposition, but from necessity. Thus we should not imitate their codified laws, but rather learn their legislative principle: adaptation to change. Like ritual prayers to heaven and earth, which suit specific occasions—how could they serve as fixed models?

While a sage's laws may be observed and emulated, the reasoning behind their legislation remains elusive. External decrees can be examined, but internal decision-making cannot be fathomed. Their words may be heard, yet their deeper meaning proves difficult to grasp. For while legal codes can be transmitted, the original legislative intent often transcends verbal expression.

Finally, the text references the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors (legendary ancient sage-kings) who held power lightly, transcended worldly concerns, equated life and death, followed transformations, relinquished concerns over status and gain, and unified with the Dao. Upholding the great Dao, they contemplated all things with genuine sincerity. Through profound understanding of the Dao, they comprehended all phenomena. Above, they befriended the cosmic Dao; below, they moved in harmony with creation—every action and stillness aligned with natural law. Yet modern seekers attempting to learn this Way find its luminous essence obscured by worldly turbidity.

變不復清明之道玄聖守其法籍行其憲令 必不能以爲治矣響使玄古聖君處於今世 猶施古法固不能治也且夫執古御今不合 時變以今學古不得清明蓋取隨時以爲光 大者矣 文子問爲政老子曰御之以道養之以德以 道御之民得所適以德養之民知所歸也無 示以賢無加以力國君尚賢則爭名於朝加 以威力則結怨於一損而執一消損賢力秉 執道德矣無處可利無見可欲處可利者必 遺博愛之義見可欲者必亂恒政之心也方 而不割廉而不劌方不因割廉不因削皆使 自全其性無矜無伐無矜能無伐功御之以 道即民附親附養之以德即民服懷服無示 以賢即民足各足無加以力即民樸莫知所 怨民自全矣無示以賢者儉也無加以力者 不敢也君儉用則天下無不足矣君不敢則 萬物全自然矣下以聚之賂以取之儉以自 全不敢自安得親下之道聚而能和全給養 之資歸之以利夫儉足則無欲是能全德不 敢自安則無怨故可自安也不下即離散不 養即背叛示以賢即民爭加以力即民怨離 散即國勢衰民背叛即上無威民爭即輕爲 非下怨其上即位危四者誠修正道幾矣君 能成修衆德絶此四患雖曰德政之道斯亦 近於淳古之風也 老子曰上言者下用也下言者上用也納下
Interpretation

This scripture presents a dialogue between Wenzi and Laozi expounding the core principles of governance. Laozi asserts that ruling a state must adhere to the fundamental tenets of Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue/Power).

When guiding the people with Dao, they naturally find their proper place; when nurturing them with De, they understand where to turn. One should neither deliberately flaunt worthiness nor abuse authority. If a ruler glorifies the worthy, ministers will compete for fame in court; if power is wielded harshly, it breeds resentment among the populace. What should truly be upheld is the root of Dao-De.

A ruler must: refrain from displaying tempting profits or covetable desires. For chasing profit erodes compassionate nature, and exposing desires disrupts stable governance. Rule with rectitude that doesn't harm, integrity without severity, allowing people to preserve their innate nature. Avoid arrogance and boasting of achievements.

Guided by Dao, people draw near willingly; nurtured by De, they submit joyfully. Without glorifying worthiness, people remain content; without applying force, they stay simple and honest. Thus the people settle naturally, free from resentment.

Not flaunting worthiness constitutes frugality; not abusing force demonstrates humility. A frugal ruler prevents scarcity in the realm; a humble sovereign allows all things to develop naturally. Conversely, belittling the people severs their loyalty; neglecting their nurture invites rebellion; parading worthiness provokes contention; employing violence stirs popular grievance. A divided state declines; betrayed subjects undermine authority; contentious people turn to wrongdoing; when lower ranks resent superiors, the ruling position becomes endangered.

Laozi concludes: The words of superiors should be actionable by subordinates; the words of subordinates should be considered by superiors. Only through such mutual communication can true governance be achieved. Implementing these principles brings one close to the pristine way of ancient rulership.

言從諫如流奉上言其出如綸上言者常用 也下言者權也立教由君是以常用諫而必 納所貴知權唯聖人爲能知權言而必信期 而必當言信者終而有徵期當者反而必合 天下之高行直而證父信而死女孰能貴之 父攘子證之直躬期女溺身之存信若此高 行誰當見哀矣故聖人論事之曲直與之屈 伸無常儀表聖人因事之宜用爲表式動在 利物寧係滯於一時祝即名君溺即捽祖卒 反父勢使然也捽提髪也夫以君父之尊處 祝溺之際不名其君則非敬不捽其父則非 孝勢在反常以濟其可矣夫權者聖人所獨 見機權至微凡情莫及夫先迕而後合者謂 之權先合而後迕者謂之不知權不知權者 善反醜矣嘗試論之曰體夫權者庭乎機變 之兩間慮變之前動機之後變在於事機在 於心唯權可以内發於機外制其變反經合 義而扶正教之功後順先違乃盡曲成之道 君有體理動有損益使民謂之自然而不知 其所以然是以易讚重巽詩美棠華非夫聖 智孰能獨見且機事不密與身爲害權事不 中以善爲醜可不慎哉 文子問曰夫子之言非道德無以治天下也 上世之王繼嗣因業亦有無道各没其世而 無禍敗者何道以然所謂墜祖宗之功德而 盡一世無禍敗者以其前代有此之類故不
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the importance of "strategic adaptation" (quanbian) in governance. The term "quan" (权变, flexibility) refers to the sage's ability to respond flexibly according to specific circumstances.

The text begins with an analogy: A ruler's commands descend like silk threads from above—this represents standard practice, while a minister's remonstrations serve as provisional measures. Establishing moral transformation relies on the ruler, who should therefore heed counsel. What is truly valuable is understanding strategic adaptation, a wisdom only sages can master. Speech must be trustworthy, and promises must be kept—only then can words and actions remain consistent.

Two cautionary tales then illustrate the dangers of rigid adherence to dogma: The first recounts the story of "Zhigong," a son who testified against his father for stealing a sheep; the second describes a woman who drowned while keeping an impractical promise. Such seemingly noble acts are ultimately unworthy of praise. Sages weigh right and wrong in handling affairs without fixed standards, responding flexibly according to circumstances and prioritizing the greater good.

The text particularly emphasizes that in exceptional situations—such as a ruler in peril or a father drowning—not addressing the ruler by title becomes disrespectful, and not grasping a father's hair to save him becomes unfilial. Here, one must break conventions to achieve righteous ends. Strategic adaptation is wisdom unique to sages, beyond ordinary comprehension. First deviating from norms to later fulfill the purpose is called quanbian; first conforming only to fail later is called lacking quanbian.

The key to mastering strategic adaptation lies in foreseeing changes before they occur and acting promptly when opportunities arise. Flexibility manifests in actions, while seizing the moment depends on inner discernment. Only through quanbian can one internally grasp timing and externally respond to change—seemingly defying norms yet ultimately upholding righteousness to preserve the Dao (the Way). A ruler's conduct must align with heavenly principle (天理), with measures knowing when to add or subtract, making the people feel it is natural without understanding why.

Finally, through examples from the Yijing praising the Xun hexagram (symbolizing compliant adaptation) and the Shijing praising the harmony of cherry blossoms (symbolizing fraternal unity), the text illustrates that without sagely wisdom, who could foresee such insights? Yet caution is needed: Leaking secrets invites disaster, and misapplied quanbian turns good into harm—thus prudence is essential.

Wenzi (a Daoist figure) asks: "Master, you say one cannot govern All-under-Heaven without Dao and De (Virtue), yet some ancient rulers without Dao died peacefully—why?" The answer: Such rulers relied on accumulated merit from their ancestors, which shielded them for a lifetime.

得不發斯問以政後代疑道之君矣老子曰 自天子以下至于庶人各自生活然其活有 薄厚天下時有亡國破家無道德之故也言 雖有没世無禍敗者但命數之厚耳然其亡 國破家莫不因無道而失者夙夜不懈戰戰 兢兢常恐危亡有家國者誠慎若此故曰子 臨先人若朽索之御六馬也縱欲怠情其亡 無時直不可保存耳使桀紂修道行德湯武 雖賢無所建其功也夏殷之末非獨桀紂之 無道也然其或没世而無敗當時以致滅誠 有薄厚之異同爲覆亡之資向使二主依道 據德則成湯周武何因建其功業矣蓋爲失 道喪德而有幸免者未有居道立德而延禍 敗者也夫道德者所以相生養也所以相畜 長也所以相親愛也所以相敬貴也道德之 養敬愛之美乃由此立夫聾蟲雖愚不害其 所愛誠使天下之民皆懷仁愛之心禍灾何 由生乎天下聾愚豈非蠢動之類尚能避害 向利以從自宜則百姓之情斷可知矣誠能 道化德被感彼親愛之心禍灾之端無由生 也夫無道而無禍敗者仁未絶義未滅也以 其未絶相愛之仁未滅相扶之義雖危而未 覆仁雖未絶義雖未滅諸侯己輕其上矣諸 侯輕上則朝廷不恭縱令不順凡恭順之至 直在乎中感者也仁絶義滅諸侯背叛衆人 力攻强者陵弱大者侵小民人以攻擊爲業
Interpretation

From emperors to commoners, all people live their lives, yet the quality of life varies greatly. The frequent occurrences of fallen states and broken families throughout the world all stem from a lack of Dao and De (Virtue/Power). While some may go through life without encountering calamity, that is merely fortunate destiny. Those who experience state collapse and familial ruin invariably lose everything due to their lack of Dao.

Only those who maintain constant vigilance and cautiousness—like driving a six-horse chariot with rotten reins—can preserve their households and states long-term. Indulging desires with laziness and negligence invites imminent destruction, making preservation impossible. Had tyrants like Jie of Xia or Zhou of Shang cultivated Dao and De, even virtuous rulers like Tang of Shang or Wu of Zhou couldn't have established their revolutionary achievements.

The fall of Xia and Shang dynasties wasn't solely due to Jie and Zhou's lack of Dao. When an era's moral fabric decays, though some may temporarily escape misfortune, ultimate collapse is inevitable. Had those two rulers followed Dao and De, what justification would Tang and Wu have had for dynastic change? While surviving calamity without virtue is possible, disasters never befall those who uphold Dao and De.

Dao and De exist for mutual nourishment and growth, fostering affection and mutual respect. Even deaf-mutes, though simple-minded, don't harm those they love. If all people embraced benevolent hearts, how could disasters arise? Even ignorant creatures know to seek benefit and avoid harm—how much more so for sentient humans?

By educating people through Dao and De, transforming hearts through virtue, and letting natural affection blossom, the roots of disaster find no soil. Those temporarily spared despite lacking Dao still retain some unbroken threads of benevolence and remnants of righteousness. Yet even with lingering virtue, feudal lords begin despising their sovereign; this contempt erodes court authority until governance becomes impossible.

True reverence and obedience must spring from hearts genuinely moved by Dao and De. When benevolence and righteousness completely vanish, lords rebel, masses rise up, the strong bully the weak, great states invade small ones, and mutual aggression becomes commonplace.

灾害生禍亂作其亡無日何期無禍也夫無 道則據德失德則依仁仁絶則義扶義滅而 亡國其所由來者漸通爲禍敗之資故當其 無道失德之時則有輕上違命之弊乗彼絶 仁滅義之後則有亡國辱身之憂但身有命 分之薄厚國有危覆之運數厚者居危以終 世薄者當覆以陷時將立本以觀之莫不由 失道之故也 老子曰法煩刑峻則民生詐上多事則下多 態必多端態以承其事求多即得寡禁多即 勝少以其失多故寡得以其犯多故少勝以 事生事又以事止事譬猶揚火而欲使無焚 也夫無事止事事則止矣以事止事事止復 生矣止彼所生之事生此所止之事則如揚 火欲求無焚而更焚也以智生患謂上智生 下患又以智備之譬猶撓水而欲求其清也 上棄智巧下民全性也除患之本止乎多端 既因智以患生復設智以防患不撓自清之 道由此遠哉 老子曰人主好仁即無功者賞有罪者釋好 刑即有功者廢無罪者及夫仁以慈濟爲功 刑以加罪爲用茍有所好則賞愆刑濫不可 君御於兆人矣嘗試論之曰道也者莫非萬 品之貴也事也者莫不用好而成也然而立 好以求道則好存於胸府道背於所求而反 以迕其理又云不失德者是以無德且道之 與德猶不可專好而成而況乎偏尚餘事而
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how the foundation of state governance and personal cultivation lies in adhering to the principles of "Dao" (the Way) and "De" (Virtue/Power). Departing from these fundamental principles will inevitably lead to various calamities.

The text first observes that when rulers lose moral standards, society gradually declines. The deterioration occurs progressively: first losing the "Dao" (the fundamental law of the universe), then losing "De" (moral conduct), subsequently relying on "benevolence," and when benevolence fails, turning to "righteousness." When even righteousness is lost, the state will perish. This decline accumulates step by step. Ultimately, the rise and fall of individuals and the fate of nations all stem from departing from the root principle of Dao.

Two metaphors then illustrate the wisdom of governance: First, just as fanning flames to extinguish them only makes them burn stronger, using complex decrees to solve problems creates more issues. Second, like stirring muddy water hoping it will clear, employing clever tactics to prevent disasters actually breeds more calamities. True governance requires rulers to abandon cunning strategies and let people maintain their natural dispositions. The fundamental way to eliminate misfortune lies in reducing artificial interference.

Finally, the text criticizes the dangers of rulers' personal preferences: Excessive preference for "benevolence" leads to rewarding the unworthy and pardoning the guilty, while overemphasis on "punishment" results in neglecting the meritorious and punishing the innocent. Genuine governance should transcend personal biases, because the Dao is the supreme principle governing all things. Ironically, stubbornly clinging to any preference while seeking the Dao will instead lead one astray from its essence. Even "Dao" and "De" should not be deliberately pursued—how much more so for lesser matters?

(Note: Here "Dao" refers to the fundamental law of the universe and supreme truth; "De" denotes the virtue manifested through following the Dao; "benevolence" and "righteousness" are core Confucian moral concepts discussed here within the Daoist philosophical framework.)

至當於天下者也無好憎者誅而無怨施而 不德如天之春秋物何得怨耳放準循繩身 無與事若天若地何不覆載任乎常度而無 心者能與二儀合德也合而和之者君也合 衆和義在乎一人别而殊之者法也犯者自 有輕重之殊是國之常法也民以受誅怨無 所藏君無容情清縣天下則抵罪者甘蹈過 地而無所尤怨焉謂之道德然後國有太平 之道君有無私之德 老子曰天下是非無所定世各是其所善而 非其所惡彼亦非爾所善而是爾所惡直非 公當故不可定也夫求是者非求道理也推 道之理則萬物玄同無非是求合於己者也 非去袤也去逆於心者也直有所合則偏係 於物豈得謂之去袤哉但自去所惡耳今吾 欲擇是而居之擇非而去之不知世之所謂 是非者也夫求是者不能是也去非者不能 無也今欲擇是而居擇非而去則何知世人 不自執所是而謂我之非哉若然者合己之 是未出於袤此明是非之治未可爲天下王 也故治大國者若烹小鮮曰勿撓而己小魚 撓之則糜碎兆人煩之則潰亂故其設法令 以相是非者不能治之也夫趨合者即言中 而益親身疏而謀當即見疑世之常情莫有 公是唯合私爲是耳故言佞而中則益親身 疏而忠則見疑今吾雖欲正身而待物何知 世之所從規我者乎將欲自正其身以待於
Interpretation

This scripture conveys two main teachings: the way of governing a state, and the discernment of right and wrong.

Regarding governance, the text states that those truly capable of ruling the world should be as impartial as heaven and earth. They do not act based on personal preferences—when punishing, they incur no resentment, and when bestowing kindness, they seek no gratitude. Just as heaven and earth operate according to natural laws, covering and supporting all things without bias, a ruler who follows such principles aligns with the virtue (De) of the cosmic duality (Yin-Yang). The function of law lies in distinguishing severity and fairness, so that even when punished, the people accept it willingly, ensuring the stability of the state.

On the matter of distinguishing right from wrong, Laozi points out that worldly standards of judgment are difficult to unify. People often label what they favor as "right" and what they dislike as "wrong." Such judgments are frequently clouded by subjective bias rather than true impartiality. Those who pursue "right" are actually seeking views that align with their own preferences, while rejecting "wrong" merely because it contradicts their opinions. If one insists on following only what they deem "correct" and dismissing what they consider "incorrect," they risk falling into obstinacy. A truly wise ruler does not cling to personal views—just as small fish should not be stirred too much while cooking ("Governing a large state is like cooking a small fish"), lest they fall apart, so too should governance avoid excessive laws, which only bring chaos.

Finally, the text observes a common human tendency: those who echo others' words appear agreeable, while those distant—even when offering sound advice—are met with suspicion. Thus, even when one seeks to conduct themselves with integrity in dealing with others, it remains unpredictable what standards the world will use to judge them.

物豈無世人以不合之故反持彼正而規我 也吾若與俗遽走猶逃雨也無之而不濡若 我之正世亦世之規我遽走爭正莫能去衰 譬猶逃雨隨其所適皆濡溼也欲在於虛即 不能虛以其心有所存乃不虚耳猶乎正取 則動未嘗正也若夫不爲虚而自虛者此所 欲而無不致也夫汎物乘理不惡於有則不 存虚而自虚矣因世寄安不非於彼則不爭 正而自正矣今以無勞而得虚無擇而常正 豈非向者所欲皆坐而致之也故通於道者 如車軸不運於己而與轂致于千里轉於無 窮之原也處中不動者則與物偕往無格於 遠近且萬化周輪未嘗有極而我之體應無 所不窮焉故聖人體道反至不化以待化動 而無爲也夫體道者其常存而不可變也以 不變化能御千變萬化而此妙用豈涉有爲 者哉 老子曰夫亟戰勝者則國必亡亟數戰也亟 戰則民罷數勝則主驕以驕主使罷民而國 不亡者寡矣主驕則恣恣則極物民罷則怨 怨則極慮物極則友事極則變上下俱極而 不亡者未之有也故功遂身退天之道也(缺/文) 通玄眞經卷
Interpretation

This scripture conveys two main teachings: the first half discusses the path of cultivating the mind, while the latter half addresses the way of governing a state.

Regarding mental cultivation, the text employs the metaphor of "seeking shelter from rain": deliberately pursuing transcendence from worldly affairs is like running through the rain to avoid getting wet, only to end up drenched. True liberation isn't achieved through forced effort, but resembles a chariot's axle that remains perfectly centered—though it doesn't actively rotate, it enables travel over great distances. Maintaining mental emptiness (referring to a state free from attachments) isn't about forcibly emptying the mind, but rather attaining it naturally. Those who embody the Dao are like the unmoving axle around which all things revolve, while they themselves remain capable of responding to infinite transformations. The sages who comprehend the great Dao appear motionless yet can adapt to all changes—this profound state cannot be reached through deliberate striving.

Concerning state governance, the text uses warfare as an illustration: nations that frequently wage war inevitably perish. Constant warfare exhausts the people, while repeated victories inflate the ruler's arrogance. An arrogant ruler indulges in desires, and an exhausted populace breeds resentment. When both ruler and subjects reach extremes, the state's collapse becomes imminent. Thus, the wise course is to withdraw after achieving success—this aligns with the natural patterns of the Dao.

The term "penetrating the mysterious" (tongxuan) refers to comprehending profound truths, while "true scripture" (zhenjing) denotes classics that elucidate the great Dao. What's called "embodying the Dao" (tidao) means realizing the great Dao through physical and mental practice—this constitutes an essential method of Daoist cultivation.

之五

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0145); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 4 Vol. 6 →