中文 · EN

《劉子》Vol. 4

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 Vol. 4 / 10 5,321 characters

About this page. The original text of 《劉子》 Vol. 4 (Taixuan 太玄部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 11 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《劉子》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

劉子卷之四無四     播州録事參軍袁孝政註    鄙名第十七 名者命之形也言者命之名也形有巧拙名 有好醜言有善惡名言之善則悅於人心名 言之惡則忮於人耳是以古人制邑名子必 依善名名之不善害於實矣昔畢萬以盈大 會福  畢萬是畢公之後文公之子名萬言大也  魏者亦言大邑後必有魏邑萬後果爲卿  至於周末乘魏國文侯即位此後果王也 晋□以怨偶逢禍  晋君太子名□怨偶後生一子名成師成  師長大殺怨偶也 然盈大者不必盡吉怨偶者不必皆凶而人 懷愛憎之意者以其名有善惡也今野人晝 見嬉子者以爲有喜樂之瑞夜夢見雀者以 爲有爵位之象然見蟢者未必有喜夢雀者 未必蟬冠而人悅之者以其名利人也水名 盜泉尼父不漱邑名朝歌顔淵不舍里名勝 母曾子還軔  軔輪也曾子欲往鄭而至勝母里礙輪而  不踐其里旋車而迴也 亭名栢人漢后夜遁  漢后是漢高祖也夜過栢人亭欲宿問曰  此是何亭左右曰此名栢人亭高祖曰若  名栢人亭逼迫於人速須急去去後果俠  客來欲害高祖至旦尋覓不見乃是趙人  貫高正遂恕其罪不以爲怨也 何者以其名害義也以蟢雀之徵無益於人 名苟近善而世俗愛之邑泉之大生人所庇 名必傷義聖賢惡之由此而言則善惡之義
Interpretation

The seventeenth chapter "On Base Names" in Book Four of the Master Liu discusses how names influence people. Names are like the materialization of fate, while words are the designations of destiny. Names can be noble or vulgar, just as words can be auspicious or ominous. Good names and words bring joy, while bad ones provoke aversion. Therefore, the ancients took great care in choosing auspicious names for cities and children.

Several examples illustrate this: Bi Wan, a minister of the Jin state during the Spring and Autumn period, bore the name "Wan" (meaning "ten thousand," symbolizing greatness), and he was later enfeoffed in Wei (whose ancient meaning also connoted "greatness"). The Jin crown prince named "Chou" (meaning "enmity") saw his son Chengshi ("Achieved Master") eventually kill him when grown. Yet the author notes that auspicious names don't always bring good fortune, nor do ominous ones guarantee misfortune—it's simply that people's psychology is easily swayed by a name's connotations.

Similar folk beliefs persist: seeing a spider (anciently called "xi zi," homophonous with "joy") by day is taken as an omen of happiness, while dreaming of sparrows suggests official promotion. Though such signs may prove unreliable, people naturally favor auspicious interpretations. Confucius refused to drink from "Thief Spring," Yan Hui wouldn't dwell in "Morning Song" city, and Zengzi (a disciple of Confucius) turned his carriage around upon hearing the place-name "Victory Over Mother Lane." Emperor Gaozu of Han narrowly escaped assassination by leaving "Cypress Man Post" (homophonous with "oppressing people") overnight—all showing how sages avoid names violating moral principles.

The conclusion observes: spider and sparrow omens bring no real benefit, yet are cherished for their lucky names; springs and settlements could shelter people, but earn sages' disdain if their names offend decency. Clearly, the moral valence of names genuinely sways human judgment.

在於名也昔有貧人命其狗曰富命子曰樂 方祭而狗入於室叱之曰富出祝曰不祥家 果有禍其子後死哭之曰樂而不自悲也莊 里有人字其長子曰盜次子曰敺盜持衣出 耨鋤草曰耨其母呼之曰盜吏因縛之其母 呼敺敺喻吏遽而聲不轉但言敺敺吏因敺 之盜幾至於殪立名不善身受其弊審名之 宜豈不信哉    知人第十八 龍之潜也慶雲未附則與魚鱉爲鄰驥之伏 也孫陽未賞必與駑駘同櫪  驥龍馬也駑駘鈍馬也孫陽國之善相焉 士之翳也知己未顧亦與傭流雜處自非神 機洞明莫能分也故明哲之相士聽之於未 聞察之於未形而監其神智識其才能可謂 知人矣若功成事遂然後知之者何異耳聞 雷霆而稱爲聦目見日月而謂之明乎故孔 方諲之相馬也  孔方諲秦人也伯樂舉之爲穆公相馬三  月始歸穆公問曰得馬否方諲曰得馬矣  馬在沙丘穆公曰何如諲曰牝而黄及其  馬至牡而驪穆公怒召伯樂青曰子何妄  舉人也毛色牝牡不辨有何相馬之能伯  樂對曰孔方諲相馬得之精不在其麤後  乘之其馬果日行千里也 雖未追風逐電絶塵掣影而迅足之勢固已 見矣薛燭之賞劎  薛燭秦人也天下别劎之人爲吴王相劎  知是寳器也 雖未陸斬玄犀水截蛟龍而銳刃之資亦已
Interpretation

On the Importance of Naming: There was once a poor man who named his dog "Wealth and Honor" and his son "Happiness." During a sacrificial ceremony, when the dog ran into the house, he shouted "Wealth and Honor, get out!" Later during prayers, he lamented this as "inauspicious." Eventually misfortune struck—when his son died, he wailed "Oh Happiness!" yet remained oblivious to his own tragic irony.

The Zhuangzi records a household that named their eldest son "Bandit" and the younger one "Expel." When the eldest went out wearing fine clothes, their mother cried "Bandit!" and officials promptly arrested him. When she then called for the younger son—"Expel!"—the officers misinterpreted it as "Drive him away" and nearly beat the elder son to death. This illustrates how improper naming invites calamity, demonstrating the vital importance of thoughtful naming practices.

On Discerning Character: When the divine dragon lies hidden, it lacks auspicious clouds as companions, appearing no different from ordinary fish and turtles. A thousand-li steed unrecognized by Bo Le (the legendary horse judge) must eat from the same trough as inferior horses. Similarly, worthy scholars before meeting enlightened rulers often blend into common crowds. Only those with extraordinary perception can distinguish them. Thus, truly wise judges of character observe speech and conduct before talents manifest, discerning wisdom through subtle signs.

Those who seek connections only after others achieve fame are like praising one's hearing upon hearing thunder, or lauding one's vision after seeing the sun and moon. Consider the story of Kong Fangyin, horse master for Duke Mu of Qin: Sent to find a superior steed at Shaqiu, he reported a "yellow mare," yet produced a "black stallion." The enraged duke berated Bo Le, who defended Kong, saying he grasped the essence beyond surface traits. The horse later proved capable of thousand-li journeys. Though it hadn't yet demonstrated wind-chasing speed, its potential was evident.

Likewise, when sword appraiser Xue Zhu examined blades for the King of Wu, he could identify divine weapons without seeing them cleave rhinos or behead serpents. These examples show how true experts perceive essence before full manifestation.

露矣故范蠡吠於犬竇文種聞而拜之  范蠡是越人文種亦是越人文種爲越王  大夫蠡見文種從門前過蠡於狗竇中吠  文種種曰狗當吠人范蠡以我爲人迴車  至蠡門入内而拜蠡薦爲越王左相越王  欲伐吴一用文種范蠡計謀遂誅吴王范  蠡謂種曰越王勾踐長頸鳥喙可與同苦  不可與同樂後必害我我欲去文種曰臣  之事君殺身以成名縱後害我就死無恨  終身不有背君之名吾不去范蠡於是泛  五湖釣魚自號漁父終身不出越王思蠡  遂鑄金爲蠡形像四時祭祀文種事越王  未經載年犯事果被越王所害如蠡之言  也 鮑龍跪石而吟仲尼爲之下車  鮑龍是賢人與孔子同時也 堯之知舜不違桑隂  堯當舉舜於雷澤之隂與舜語於桑樹下  桑隂不移堯即知舜是賢人堪爲天子故  以讓位與也 文王之知吕望不以永日  文王出遊獵占今日獵合得一狩非熊非  羆合得帝王師果是吕望王與同車而還 眉睫之微  昔人姓隟名雍善能察賊得眉睫之間即  知是賊趙子謂曰吾聞之人目大明察見  泉下魚必凶未經年隟雍果被賊殺也 而形於色音聲之妙而動於心賢聖觀察不 待成功而知之也陳平之棄楚歸漢魏無知 識其善謀  陳平陽武郡户牖人也少時家貧在村作  社頭分肉甚平父老謂之曰陳孺子分肉
Interpretation

Fan Li (strategist of the Yue State during the Spring and Autumn period) and Wen Zhong were both natives of Yue. When Wen Zhong served as a senior official in Yue, he once passed by Fan Li's residence. Fan Li deliberately crawled through a dog hole and imitated a dog's bark. Upon hearing this, Wen Zhong remarked, "Dogs only bark at strangers. Fan Li must regard me as one of his own." He then turned his carriage around to visit Fan Li's home. Later, Fan Li recommended Wen Zhong to serve as the Left Chancellor of Yue.

When King Goujian of Yue prepared to attack the State of Wu, he adopted the strategies of Wen Zhong and Fan Li, ultimately defeating the King of Wu. Fan Li warned Wen Zhong, "The King of Yue has a long neck and a pointed mouth—such a man shares hardships but not prosperity. He will surely turn against us. I plan to leave." Wen Zhong replied, "A minister should serve his lord with complete devotion, even unto death. I would rather die without regret than bear the infamy of betrayal."

Fan Li then retreated to the Five Lakes to fish, calling himself "the Old Fisherman" and never returning to office. The King of Yue missed him so deeply that he cast a golden statue in his likeness and offered sacrifices to it seasonally. Yet Wen Zhong, who remained in service for less than a year, was indeed executed by the king, just as Fan Li had foretold.

Bao Long (a recluse of the Spring and Autumn period) once knelt on a rock reciting poetry. When Confucius heard him, he deliberately stepped down from his carriage to pay respects. Bao Long was a sage of Confucius' time.

Emperor Yao once conversed with Shun beneath a mulberry tree by Thunder Marsh. Recognizing Shun's extraordinary wisdom—so profound that even the tree's shade did not shift—Yao deemed him worthy to inherit the throne and abdicated in his favor.

Before King Wen of Zhou set out hunting, he consulted the oracle, which foretold he would meet "neither bear nor panther" but a teacher fit for an emperor. Sure enough, he encountered Jiang Ziya (Lü Wang) by the Wei River and took him into his carriage.

In ancient times, a man named Xi Yong was exceptionally skilled at identifying thieves—he could discern them just by observing their brows and eyes. Zhao Jianzi warned him, "I’ve heard that those whose vision is too sharp can even see fish beneath the earth, and such gifts invite calamity." Within a year, Xi Yong was indeed killed by thieves. This illustrates how sages perceive the course of events without needing to witness their outcomes.

When Chen Ping (a founding minister of the Han dynasty) was young and poor, he presided over village sacrificial rites, distributing meat with such fairness that the villagers praised him: "The Chen boy divides meat with perfect justice!" Later, he defected from Xiang Yu to join Liu Bang. Wei Wuzhi (Liu Bang’s strategist) immediately recognized his talent for strategy.

 極平陳曰使平得宰相治天下如此肉平  後值漢與楚爭滅秦陳平在項羽下作將  軍項羽不能用賢平遂背楚來投漢漢相  魏無知舉於高祖高祖用爲謢軍遂破楚  滅秦說六奇之謀以定天下今故言棄楚  歸漢也 韓信之亡於黑水蕭何知其能將  韓信淮隂人家貧不事生業好帶長劎後  亡於黑水得爲連敖之官犯事十二人皆  被誅誅至信信仰視刀人滕公謂公曰欲  定天下而殺壯士乎滕公聞之遂不斬將  見蕭何何薦於高祖高祖用爲治粟都尉  信以官小又棄高祖逃走蕭何聞信走遂  自逐三日乃還何謂高祖曰韓信天下名  士用之則留不用之則終亡也高祖拜爲  大將軍乃滅趙破魏席卷三秦平定海内  信之力也 豈特吐六奇而後明破趙魏而方識哉若非 臨機能謀而知其智犯難涉危乃見其勇是 凡夫之識非明哲之鑒公輸之刻鳳也冠距 未成翠羽未樹人見其身者謂之鶜鵄(上莫/項切) (下鴟/同)見其首者名曰鴮鸅(上於乎切/下音澤)皆訾其 醜而笑其拙及鳳之成翠冠雲聳朱距電摇 錦身霞散綺翮焱(弋贍呼/吴二切)發翽然一翥翻翔 雲棟三日而不集然後讚其奇而稱其巧堯 遭洪水浩浩滔天蕩蕩懷山下民昏墊禹爲 匹夫未有功名堯深知之使治水焉乃鑿龍 門斬荆山導熊耳通鳥鼠櫛奔風
Interpretation

The text from Master Liu recounts the stories of two historical figures, illustrating how true talent often requires trials before its worth becomes evident.

First is the account of Chen Ping: Originally serving as a general under Xiang Yu, he found his abilities unrecognized by the warlord who failed to employ worthy men. After defecting to Liu Bang upon Wei Wuzhi's recommendation, Chen Ping became Protector of the Army. He devised six extraordinary strategies that helped Liu Bang defeat Xiang Yu, overthrow the Qin dynasty, and ultimately pacify the realm. This demonstrates how genuine talent, though temporarily obscured, will eventually find its proper stage to shine.

Next is Han Xin's journey: Born into poverty, he once held the minor post of Lian'ao while fleeing through Heishui. When facing execution for a legal offense, Teng Gong recognized his potential and spared him. Later, Xiao He discovered Han Xin's brilliance. Though initially assigned only as Granary Commandant—a position Han Xin deemed beneath him, prompting his flight—Xiao He pursued him through the night, urgently advising Liu Bang: "Han Xin possesses unparalleled talent. Employ him and he'll stay; reject him and he'll be lost forever." Liu Bang ultimately appointed him Supreme General. True to form, Han Xin destroyed Zhao, conquered Wei, pacified the Three Qins, and became instrumental in unifying the empire.

The author employs the metaphor of Gongshu Ban carving a phoenix to reveal how recognizing talent demands discernment: When the sculpture remained unfinished, people mocked its crude form. Only when completed—with emerald crest raised high, crimson talons gleaming, and iridescent plumage radiant as sunset clouds—did the phoenix soar for three days without landing, leaving observers awestruck. Similarly, before controlling the floods, Yu the Great appeared ordinary, yet Emperor Yao foresaw his capability, commissioning him to breach Dragon Gate, cleave Mount Jing, dredge Bear's Ear and Bird-Rat Mountains until the deluge submitted.

This passage teaches that true talent resembles an unfinished phoenix statue—ordinary eyes see only surfaces, while enlightened rulers and ministers perceive the essence. As the uncarved jade holds concealed splendor and unpolished pearls harbor hidden radiance, great worth often lies veiled before its destined hour.

 櫛者風刷人之體如梳櫛髮也 沐驟雨面目黧䵟手足胼胝冠絓不暇取經 門不及過使百川東注于海西被于流沙生 人免爲魚鱉之患於是衆人咸歌詠始知其 賢故見其朴而知其巧者是王爾之知公輸 也鳳成而知其巧者是衆人之知公輸也未 有功而知其賢者是堯之知禹也有功而知 其賢者是衆人之知禹也故知人之難未易 遇也侯生夷門抱關之隸見知於無忌  侯生魏人也名嬴夷門是大梁之東門其  時侯生知夷門之關賤隸謂奴僕也魏公  子無忌意在禮賢欲見侯生恐天下士至  盛設坐席延魏貴臣未飲之間忌自乘車  往侯生家請迎侯生與同載至市中侯生  於是停公子車於市謂公子曰市上屠兒  朱亥其人賢官不達隱在屠肆生欲與語  請公子且停車少時生遂下車與朱亥語  乆而不來市人皆罵侯生小人停公子車  於市侯生偷視公子都無嗔色知公子無  忌賢遂來上車共至公子家衆客各驚訝  始知侯生是賢人也 豫子范中行之亡虜也蒙知於智伯  豫子豫讓也先事范中行范中行反智伯  殺中行豫讓轉事智伯智伯後被趙襄子  殺讓欲與智伯報讎殺襄子詐爲賤隸伏  襄子厠中襄子欲入厠門忽心動怪之使  人搜厠中乃見讓身邊挾劎問之讓曰我  是智伯臣也欲爲智伯報讎故來至此襄
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the difficulty of recognizing true talent through several historical anecdotes.

It begins with a metaphor of combing hair - just as a comb straightens tangled locks and storms test physical endurance. The narrative then recounts Yu the Great's flood control: when torrential rains fell, Yu worked tirelessly to channel rivers to the sea without pausing to straighten his robes or enter his home, saving people from disaster. Only then did the masses praise his virtue. Like carpenter Wang Er who could discern Lu Ban's (Gongshu's) unfinished craftsmanship while ordinary people needed to see the completed phoenix carving, or Emperor Yao who recognized Yu's ability before his achievements while commoners understood only after the flood control succeeded.

Two key stories about recognizing talent follow:

The first concerns Hou Ying (Master Hou), the lowly gatekeeper of Wei's eastern gate discovered by Lord Xinling (Prince Wuji of Wei). When hosting a banquet, the prince personally drove his carriage to fetch Hou, who deliberately tested him by stopping at the marketplace for prolonged conversation with butcher Zhu Hai. Seeing the prince's unwavering respect, Hou confirmed his sincerity in honoring worthies. Only then did the assembled guests realize this gatekeeper was truly virtuous.

The second story tells of Yu Rang (Yu Zi), originally a retainer of the Fan clan who later served Earl Zhi. When Zhi was killed by Viscount Xiang of Zhao, Yu disguised himself as a slave and hid in a latrine attempting assassination. Though discovered, Zhao released him for his loyalty.

These stories demonstrate: recognizing ability before achievements manifest - like Yao discerning Yu or Wang Er recognizing Lu Ban's skill - requires rare insight. Ordinary people often realize talent only after accomplishments appear. True worthy rulers can spot greatness in obscurity, as Lord Xinling recognized Hou Ying and Earl Zhi perceived Yu Rang's worth.

 子曰烈士也遂捨之讓後漆身吞炭毁形  易貌欲殺襄子其妻不識友人識之曰子  欲殺襄子何不先事襄子而後殺之豈不  可乎無故自損何由得近襄子也讓曰豈  有食人之禄懷惡於人吾不爲也乃候襄  子出伏劎橋下欲殺襄子襄子至橋馬驚  襄子曰必豫讓也使人搜之乃是讓襄子  怒讓罪曰子前於厠中吾以捨焉今復更  爲汝罪當死子先事范中行智伯殺范中  行子何不爲中行殺智伯而欲殺我何也  讓曰我事范中行只以衆人禮待我我以  衆人禮報之智伯以國士之禮待我我以  國士禮報智伯至死無恨臣願大王與身  上衣以劎擊之方則就死襄子遂脫衣與  之讓得衣怒目叫呼以劎擊衣襄子當被  擊衣之時心中不喜從擊衣之後漸患未  經旬日乃至死也 名尊而身顯榮滿於當世雖復刎頸魏庭漆 身趙郊揣情酬德未報知己虚左之顧國士 之遇也  虚左之顧者謂空車内左邊擬坐處也國  士遇者即是智伯豫讓以國士之禮也 世之烈士願爲賞者授命猶瞽者之思視躄 者之想行而目終不得開足不得伸徒自悲 夫    薦賢第十九 國之需賢譬車之恃輪猶舟之倚檝也車摧 輪則無以行舟無檝則無以濟國之乏賢則 無以理國之多賢如託造父之乘  造父是穆王時善御之人也 附越客之於舟
Interpretation

Yu Rang, a renowned assassin of the Spring and Autumn period, was a man of unwavering loyalty. To avenge his lord, he went to extraordinary lengths to alter his appearance - coating his body with lacquer to change his complexion and swallowing charcoal to alter his voice. His transformation was so complete that even his own wife failed to recognize him. Only a friend identified him and advised: "If you wish to kill Lord Xiang of Zhao, why not first enter his service to await your opportunity? By harming yourself needlessly like this, how can you possibly get close to him?" Yu Rang replied: "How could I accept another's patronage while harboring murderous intent? Such duplicity is beyond me."

Later, Yu Rang lay in ambush beneath a bridge frequented by Lord Xiang. When the lord's horses suddenly reared in alarm during the crossing, he immediately suspected Yu Rang's presence. Guards searched and captured the assassin. Lord Xiang confronted him: "I spared you once before in the privy, yet you return to kill me. By law you deserve death. You previously served the Fan and Zhonghang clans - when Earl Zhi destroyed them, why didn't you avenge them by killing Zhi? Why target me instead?" Yu Rang answered: "The Fans treated me as an ordinary man, so I repaid them as such. But Earl Zhi honored me as a guoshi (pillar of the state), and so I must repay him with corresponding loyalty, even unto death without regret."

Yu Rang requested permission to symbolically stab Lord Xiang's outer garment to fulfill his vow of vengeance. When granted, he glared fiercely and thrust three times at the robe before taking his own life. Though Lord Xiang outwardly complied, unease settled in his heart, and he died of illness not long after.

This account illustrates how true martyrs seek not worldly riches but the profound recognition of being treated as "reserved seating for an honored guest" or being "received as a pillar of the state." Like the blind who yearn to see or the lame who long to walk yet cannot, many loyal retainers throughout history have willingly given their lives for those who recognized their worth, often leaving only regret behind.

The section on "recommending worthies" employs vivid metaphors to emphasize a state's need for talented officials: as chariots depend on wheels and boats require oars, a kingdom without capable ministers cannot be governed. With an abundance of worthy talents, governing becomes as smooth as riding in a chariot driven by Zaofu (the legendary charioteer of King Mu of Zhou) or sailing in the swift boats of Yue boatmen.

 越客是越人居于海上善能乘舟 身不勞而千里可期足不行而蓬萊可至  山名蓬萊在海中仙人所居處也 朝之乏賢若鳳虧六翮欲望背摩青天臆衝 絳煙終莫由也峻極之山非一石所成凌雲 之榭非一木所構狐白之裘非一腋之毳宇 宙爲宅非一賢所治是以古之人君必招賢 聘隱人臣則獻士舉知唐昇二八流睦睦之 美周保十亂播濟濟之詠仲尼在衛趙鞅折 謀  晋趙鞅好兵欲伐衛知仲尼在衛乃即折  其謀策不能伐衛也 干木處魏秦人罷兵  段干木是魏賢人也魏文侯常往其處問  國政秦欲伐魏左右諫曰魏有賢人段干  木文侯日往其家論决政事未可伐也秦  王止兵不能伐魏 宫奇未亡獻公不侵  宫奇是虞之公子晋獻公欲伐虢以騎馬  垂棘之璧將獻於虞假道宫奇諫曰虢是  虞之表也脣亡則齒寒晋人謂獻公曰宫  奇懦弱之人必不能强諫雖諫虞君未足  用也但多許寳貝必尅晋君差人多許寳  貝虞君貪財受之宫奇遂亡晋君滅虢因  迴軍并討虞國而歸 子玉猶存文公側坐  晋文公與子玉戰大破子玉文公自變色  側身而坐畏子玉賢人將有别計而圖已 以此而言則立政致治折衝厭難者𡒊賢之 效也夫連城之璧瘞影荆山  連城璧是趙國玉璧也秦王欲連十城就  趙買也
Interpretation

There was a man from Yue who excelled in sailing, living by the sea with extraordinary skill in navigating boats. Without exertion, he could travel thousands of miles; without walking, he could reach the immortal isle of Penglai. Penglai, the celestial mountain in the sea, is said to be the dwelling place of immortals in legends.

When the imperial court lacks worthy talents, it is like a phoenix with broken wings—though it may desire to soar through the blue heavens and pierce the clouds, it ultimately cannot. Towering mountains are not built from a single stone; cloud-piercing towers are not raised from a single beam; and precious white fox furs are not made from a single underarm hair. Governing the world is an even greater task—it cannot be accomplished by a single worthy person alone.

Thus, wise rulers of antiquity sought out recluses, and ministers recommended capable individuals. For example, Emperor Yao employed the "Eight Virtuous Ones" and "Eight Harmonious Ones"—sixteen worthy ministers—to create an era of peace and prosperity. The Zhou dynasty relied on ten capable ministers to govern, leaving behind the praise of "gathering many talents."

When Confucius was in the state of Wei, Zhao Yang (a powerful minister of Jin) planned to attack Wei but abandoned the plan upon hearing Confucius was there. The worthy Duan Ganmu of Wei lived in seclusion, yet Marquis Wen of Wei frequently visited him for counsel on state affairs. When Qin intended to attack Wei, its ministers dissuaded the king, saying, "Wei has Duan Ganmu, whom Marquis Wen consults daily. This is not the right time to attack." The Qin king thus canceled the campaign.

Another example is Gong Zhiqi of Yu. While he remained in Yu, Duke Xian of Jin dared not act rashly. Later, Jin bribed the ruler of Yu with fine horses and jade. Gong Zhiqi admonished, "The state of Guo is Yu's shield—just as lips gone leave teeth exposed to the cold." Sadly, the ruler of Yu, coveting the treasures, ignored the advice. After Gong Zhiqi left, Jin first conquered Guo and then, on its return, easily annexed Yu.

After Duke Wen of Jin defeated the Chu general Ziyu, though victorious, he remained uneasy, fearing the capable man might have another strategy. These examples all demonstrate that governing a state and resolving crises hinge on employing worthy talents. Just as the priceless He's Jade (a famed jade of Zhao) was once buried in the mountains of Jing.

夜光之珠潜輝鬱浦玉無翼而飛珠無脛而 行揚聲於章華之臺炫燿於綺羅之堂者蓋 人君之舉也賢士有脛而不肯至者蠹才於 幽岫腐智於柴蓽者蓋人不能自薦未有爲 之舉也古人競舉所知爭引其類才苟適治 不問世冑智苟能謀奚妨粃行昔時人君拔 奇於囚虜擢能於屠販  文王用太公太公屠牛於朝歌高祖用樊  噲樊噲殺犬賣無忌用朱亥朱亥作屠兒  灌嬰販繒綵高祖用之此皆屠販見用也 内薦不避子外薦不避讎  祁奚内舉其子外舉讎人故言内薦不避  子外薦不隱讎也 身受進賢之賞名有不朽之芳昔子貢問於 孔子曰誰爲大賢子曰齊有鮑叔鄭有子皮 子貢曰齊無管仲鄭無子産乎子曰吾聞進 賢爲賢排賢爲不肖  骨肉相似言不似其先祖 鮑叔薦管仲子皮薦子産未聞二子有所舉 也進賢爲美逾身之賢矧復抑賢者乎故黔 息碎首以明百里北郭刎頸以申晏嬰  北郭搔家貧無以養親晏子知其賢每分  粟與之後晏子爲齊君所逐北郭搔遂自  刎其頭於齊君之廷明晏子無罪齊君於  是再進晏子復還齊相也 所以致命而不辭者爲國薦士滅身無悔忠 之至也德之難也臧文仲不顯展禽仲尼謂 之竊位  展禽名柳下嘗三爲士師無喜色三已之  無愠色孔子知其清潔乃以兄女妻之時
Interpretation

This passage expounds on the wisdom of ancient rulers in selecting talent and the virtue of worthy individuals recommending others.

Pearls hidden in deep pools do not shine on their own; jade has no wings yet can be carried far, and precious gems have no legs yet spread their fame across the land. Just as treasures are praised on the Zhanghua Terrace or displayed before the halls of fine silks, it is ultimately due to the recognition and promotion of rulers. Many capable individuals retreat to mountain forests, unwilling to serve, their talents buried in humble dwellings—often because no one recommends them.

The sage rulers of antiquity selected talent without rigid standards: King Wen of Zhou employed Jiang Ziya, who once slaughtered oxen in Zhaoge; Emperor Gaozu of Han appointed Fan Kuai, who came from a butcher’s background; Lord Wuji of Wei valued the butcher Zhu Hai; and Guan Ying, originally a silk merchant, was also elevated by Liu Bang. These examples prove that those of humble origins can still become pillars of the state.

Recommending talent should be impartial. During the Spring and Autumn period, the Jin minister Qi Xi recommended his own son to his ruler and his own enemy to another, truly embodying the principle of "not avoiding kin in internal recommendations, nor avoiding foes in external ones." Those who recommend the worthy earn lasting renown—like Bao Shuya, who recommended Guan Zhong, or Zipi, who recommended Zichan—their virtuous reputations even surpassing those they recommended.

The text also records moving stories: Beiguo Sao lived in poverty, and Yan Ying often aided him. Later, when Yan Ying was exiled by the Qi ruler, Beiguo Sao risked his life to plead for justice, even committing suicide to prove Yan Ying’s innocence, ultimately restoring him to office. Such selfless dedication to recommending the worthy and sacrificing life for righteousness represents the highest form of loyalty and virtue.

In contrast, figures like Zang Wenzhong, who suppressed talent (as seen in his neglect of Zhan Qin’s abilities), were criticized by Confucius as "stealing official positions." Zhan Qin (also known as Liuxia Hui) neither showed pride when appointed three times nor resentment when dismissed three times. Confucius praised his noble character and even arranged for his niece to marry him.

Through these contrasting examples, the text illustrates that true worthiness lies not only in personal talent but also in the willingness to recognize and recommend others. Wise rulers should open broad paths for talent, regardless of origin. This philosophy of "advancing the worthy as true worthiness" remains deeply thought-provoking even today.

 人始知其賢也 公孫弘不引董生汲黯將爲妬賢  公孫是公孫弘董生是董仲舒也汲黯是  漢相公孫弘知董生賢而不舉黯以爲妬  賢士者也 虞丘不薦叔敖樊姬貶爲不肖  虞丘者楚相楚莊王朝諸臣因與虞丘語  乆之日晏乃還樊姬下殿而迎之謂王曰  君朝何以晏莊王曰我與賢人語故晏也  樊姬曰賢人是誰王曰虞丘子樊姬於是  掩口而笑曰妾雖不肖幸執箕箒妾所進  者十人與妾同類而虞丘子爲相十年其  進者非其子弟即是昆季專君之寵竊君  之權知孫叔敖而不進是爲不肖何爲賢  人莊王以告虞丘虞丘曰小臣伏罪於是  遂進叔敖爲相楚國大理叔敖之力也 東閭不達髦士後行不正於路歸  東閭不達髦士不正於路歸東閭者東閭  先生曾相齊侯坐事而退徒步於路人謂  曰先生何至於此東閭曰吾位至台鼎不  能伸致一人積財千萬不能賑恤一士今  至於此也 爲國入寳不如能獻賢進賢受上賞蔽賢蒙 顯戮斯前識之良相後代之明鏡矣     因顯第二十 夫火以吹熱生焰鏡以瑩拂成鑑火不吹則 無外耀之光鏡不瑩必闕内影之照故吹爲 火之光瑩爲鏡之華人之寓代亦須聲譽以 發光華猶比火鏡假吹瑩也今雖智如樗里 才若賈生  樗里是樗子也是秦惠王弟名莊居在樗
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the vital importance of recognizing and recommending worthy talents through several historical anecdotes.

During the Western Han dynasty, Gongsun Hong knew Dong Zhongshu (a great Confucian scholar of the Han) was a worthy talent yet refused to recommend him. Ji An (a famous Han minister) considered this an act of jealousy toward capable individuals. In the state of Chu, Prime Minister Yu Qiu held office for ten years but only recommended his own relatives, despite knowing the abilities of Sunshu Ao (Chu's renowned chancellor). Lady Fan Ji, King Zhuang of Chu's wife, directly pointed out that Yu's behavior was unworthy of a virtuous man, prompting Yu to admit his fault and finally recommend Sunshu Ao. Under Sunshu Ao's governance, Chu flourished.

Master Donglü once served as prime minister of Qi but later fell from grace. When asked why he met such misfortune, he reflected: "While in high position, I never recommended a single worthy talent, and though accumulating vast wealth, I never aided a single scholar. My current fate is self-inflicted."

The text concludes that searching for national treasures pales in comparison to recommending worthy talents. Rewarding those who promote capable individuals and punishing those who suppress them represents invaluable wisdom from our ancestors. Just as fire needs fanning to burn brightly and mirrors require polishing to reflect clearly, talents need reputation to shine forth. Even with the wisdom of Chuli Ji (renowned strategist and brother of King Hui of Qin) or the brilliance of Jia Yi (Western Han political theorist), without recommendation, their abilities would remain unrealized.

These stories collectively demonstrate that those in power must possess both the discernment to recognize talent and the virtue to recommend them—this constitutes the foundation of good governance.

 里號樗里子滑稽多智時人號曰智士也  賈生者姓賈名誼洛陽人善攻文藻時人  謂之曰賈生洛陽才終軍山東之英妙也 居環堵之室無知己之談望迹流於地聲聞 於天不可得也柳下惠不遇仲尼則貞潔之 行不顯未免於三黜之臣無耻之人也季布 不遇曹丘則百金之諾不揚  季布漢時人也曹丘見之曰寧得季布之  一諾不用黄金百斤 未離於凡虜無羞之人也二子所以德洽於 當時而聲流于萬代者聖賢吹瑩也昔有賣 良馬於市者已三旦矣而市人不顧乃謂伯 樂曰吾賣良馬而市人莫賞願子一顧請獻 半馬之價於是伯樂造市來而迎睇之去而 目送之一朝之價遂至千金此馬非昨爲駑 駘今成駃(音/决)騠(音/提)也由人莫之賞未有爲之 顧盻者也夫樟木盤根鉤枝癭節蠹皮輪囷 擁腫則衆眼不顧匠者採焉製爲殿堂塗以 丹漆畫爲黼藻則百辟卿士莫不顧盻仰視 木性猶是也而昔賤今貴者良工之爲容也 荆磎之珠夜光之璧薦之侯王必藏之以玉 匣緘之以金縢若闇以投人則莫相盻以愕 接劎而怒  蛇含夜光之珠欲報隋侯若闇以投之隋  侯悒愕乃按劎而怒欲斬之所以爲無因  而至故也 何者爲無因而至故也若物有所因則良馬 勞於駔闠(上音/愴)  駔者是古之合市人闠者是馬行至空地
Interpretation

The passage recounts several historical anecdotes illustrating how talented individuals require discerning patrons to recognize their worth.

Chuli Zi, a renowned strategist of the Warring States period, was celebrated as the "Wise Counselor" for his wit and humor. Jia Yi, the eminent Western Han political essayist, was praised by the people of Luoyang as the "Luoyang Genius," while Zhong Jun, the distinguished Han general, was hailed as a prodigy of Shandong. Yet without recognition, even the most virtuous remain obscure—just as Liu Xiahui, the virtuous sage of the Spring and Autumn period, might have languished in obscurity had he not encountered Confucius, his moral integrity unsung and his career marked by repeated demotions. Similarly, without the advocacy of Cao Qiu, the famed general Ji Bu would never have earned his reputation for "keeping promises worth a thousand gold."

Two analogies further emphasize the importance of a discerning eye: A horse trader struggled for three days to sell his steed, but the moment Bole—the legendary judge of horses—glanced at it, its value soared a hundredfold. Likewise, camphorwood, initially dismissed for its gnarled appearance, was transformed by a skilled craftsman into a magnificent pillar admired by all. This demonstrates that an object’s worth often hinges on encountering someone who truly appreciates it.

Finally, the parable of the luminous pearl warns that presenting treasures indiscriminately may invite suspicion or even mortal danger. When Marquis Sui received the legendary pearl offered by a serpent, his first instinct was to draw his sword in alarm. True value requires the right moment and the right audience—just as a fine steed needs an expert horse trader (zanghui) to realize its potential.

 也 美材朽於幽谷寳珠觸於按劎若有所因而 至則良馬一顧千金樟木光於紫殿珠擎之 玉匣今人之居代雖抱才智幽鬱窮閨而無 所因耶未有爲之聲譽光之以吹瑩欲望身 之光名之顯猶捫虚縛風 猶捫虚而欲縛風捫者摸也摸虚而欲縛  風也 煎湯覓雪豈可得乎 劉
Interpretation

This passage speaks of the predicament of unrecognized talent. Just as fine timber rots away in remote mountains and precious pearls are carelessly discarded in sword cases, even genuine ability and learning remain unappreciated without proper recognition and recommendation. A thousand-mile steed requires a discerning eye like Bole's to prove its worth, camphor wood must be placed in the Purple Palace to reveal its nobility, and fine jade needs a jeweled casket to manifest its value.

In our present world, though people may possess wisdom and talent, they often remain confined to obscure alleys and humble dwellings, unknown to others—all because they lack proper advocates. Without someone to spread their reputation, it becomes as futile as trying to grasp the wind with bare hands ("捫虚縛风" refers to the vain attempt to clutch at empty air) or boiling water in search of snow. How could such efforts ever succeed?

The text employs a series of contrasts: fine timber versus rotten wood, precious pearls versus sword cases, the Purple Palace versus impoverished alleys—all illustrating how environment determines the perceived worth of talent. "吹莹" (blowing dust off jade to make it shine) symbolizes how mentorship and recommendation are needed to reveal one's brilliance. The entire passage exposes the universal phenomenon of unrecognized talent in ancient society, emphasizing how opportunity and proper introduction are crucial for personal development.

子卷之四

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5d0053); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 3 Vol. 5 →