中文 · EN

《劉子》Vol. 7

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 Vol. 7 / 10 5,972 characters

About this page. The original text of 《劉子》 Vol. 7 (Taixuan 太玄部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 12 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《劉子》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

劉子卷之七無七     播州録事參軍袁孝政註    貴言第三十一 越劎性銳必託槌砧以成純鉤楚柘質勁必 資搒檠(上步萌反下音競/搒檠造子之器物)  正弓所用以定曲直矯而不正者也 以成弴弓(弴丁幺丁/昆二切)  畫弓天子所用之弓也 人性雖敏必藉善言以成德行故槌砧者夷 不平也搒檠者矯不正也善言者正不善也 人目短於自見故借鏡以觀形髮拙於自理 必假櫛以脩束心闇於自炤則假言以樂行 面之所以形明鏡之力也髮之所以理假櫛 之功也行之所以榮善言之益也鏡櫛理形 其惠輕也善言成德其惠重也人皆悅鏡之 明己形而不慕士之明己心人欲櫛之理其 髮不願善言之理其情是棄重德而採輕功 不亦倒乎爲衣冠者己手不能製則知越鄉 借人以製之至於理身而不知借言以修其 行是處其身輕而於冠重不亦謬乎君子重 正言之惠賢於軒璧之贈樂聞其過勝於德 義之名故楚莊王輕於千乘之國而重申叔 一言  陳國徵舒作亂而殺陳君楚莊王聞之將  兵往陳而殺徵舒將其陳國欲以爲郡使  其莊王子守之其臣申叔諫曰王今爲陳  伐得徵舒餘地欲以爲郡使子守之四方  諸侯聞之不言王爲陳伐惡道王貪其地  而伐徵舒王何不令使於外方訪陳後裔
Interpretation

Chapter 31 "The Value of Words" in Volume 7 of the Master Liu text discusses the importance of virtuous speech for self-cultivation. Yuan Xiaozheng's commentary provides several vivid illustrations:

Just as the sharp swords from Yue territory must undergo the blacksmith's hammer and anvil to become renowned blades like "Chun Jun," or how the sturdy zhe wood from Chu requires the "bang qing" (an ancient tool for straightening bows) to be crafted into imperial ceremonial bows, so too must human nature—though inherently intelligent—be refined through virtuous words to perfect one's De (Virtue).

The text employs three everyday analogies to illuminate this principle: People use mirrors to adjust their appearance and combs to arrange their hair, yet often neglect using virtuous words to illuminate their inner selves. Mirrors and combs only address external appearances—a minor benefit—whereas virtuous speech cultivates De, representing far greater merit. Regrettably, people frequently prioritize superficial adornment over spiritual refinement, akin to valuing fine robes while neglecting personal virtue—a fundamental misplacement of priorities.

The chapter concludes with an anecdote about King Zhuang of Chu: When contemplating the annexation of Chen, his minister Shen Shishi admonished that such action would lead other states to perceive Chu as land-hungry warmongers. Heeding this advice, the king instead installed a Chen descendant on the throne. This exemplifies how wise rulers treasure candid counsel, valuing a single virtuous word more than a thousand-chariot kingdom, preferring constructive criticism over hollow praise.

 立爲主安政理國楚王用其言訪得後裔  立爲主也 范獻賤萬畝之田以貴舟人片說  范獻晋卿也殺晋大夫欒友後欲出遊惡  欒友之子報讎行至津所問舟人曰君見  欒友之子乎舟人曰君還晋修晋之政令  雖欒友之子其若何君若出入無度不修  國之政令今我舟中之人與欒友子無異  君何問焉獻遂以田萬畝賜舟人以貴舟  人之片說也 季路抱五愼之誡趙孟佩九言之箴  箴陳也九言箴者無姤亂無怙寬無恃寵  無雷同無徹禮無儉能無汎恕無誅非德  無犯非義也 由此觀之軒璧之與田邑豈能與善言齊價 哉夫桓侯不採越人之說卒成骨髓之疾  越人扁鵲也于時來入齊見桓侯有疾曰  公疾可理公曰老醫欲以不患者爲已驗  扁鵲出明日又見告桓公曰君疾可治桓  公曰無疾可治後日來見桓公乃走扁鵲  去後公患劇差人尋覓扁鵲欲使理病扁  鵲則來見桓公謂曰我前日不患君欲理  病今者既患君何棄我而去扁鵲曰初見  君病在皮膚針灸可差次見君病在肌血  湯藥可差後見君病在膏肓之下此病不  可治我故走去桓公曰此善良醫以禮發  桓公於是卒也 吴王不聽枚乘之言終受夷滅之禍  枚乘是吴王之臣枚皋之父吴王作亂枚  乘諫之不用其言遂至滅國也已
Interpretation

This passage recounts several historical anecdotes illustrating the importance of heeding wise counsel.

When the State of Chu adopted the advice of virtuous ministers to seek out a suitable descendant for the throne, the kingdom achieved stability. When Fan Xian, a minister of Jin, planned a pleasure trip, his boatman admonished: "If you diligently govern, even if the son of Luan You comes for revenge, he can do nothing; but if you neglect state affairs, anyone aboard this vessel could become your enemy." Moved by this, Fan Xian rewarded the boatman with ten thousand acres of fertile land to honor his loyal words.

The text then describes the conduct of two exemplary men: Ji Lu (a disciple of Confucius) adhered to five disciplines of caution, while Zhao Meng (a Jin official) carried nine admonitions. These nine principles were: no envy, no tyranny, no abuse of favor, no blind following, no violation of rites, no hoarding of talents, no excessive leniency, no punishment of virtuous men, and no unrighteous deeds.

Through these examples, the text demonstrates that precious jade and fiefdoms pale in comparison to valuable advice. Duke Huan of Qi ignored Bian Que's (the legendary physician) diagnosis and ultimately died from an incurable illness. During three consultations, Bian Que had warned: "At first, the illness was in the skin and treatable by acupuncture; then in the muscles curable by decoctions; but when it reached the marrow, no remedy existed."

Similarly, the King of Wu disregarded minister Mei Sheng's counsel against rebellion, leading to the kingdom's downfall. These stories collectively show that rejecting loyal advice brings grave consequences, while valuing admonitions preserves both personal safety and national stability.

夫人之將疾者必不甘魚肉之味身之將敗 者必不納忠諫之言故臨死者謂無良醫之 蔽將敗者謂無直諫之臣而不聽善言是耳 聾也非其耳之有塞善言不入耳乎是以明 者納規於未形採言於患表從善如轉圓遣 惡如去讎正音日聞於耳禍害逾遠於身昔 堯帝招諫之鼓舜樹誹謗之木湯立司過之 士武王立誡愼之鼗  鼗小鼓也貫而摇之又作鞀也 以聖哲之神鑒窮機洞微非有毫釐之謬也 猶設廣聽之術開嘉言之路豈不貽厥將來 表正言之益邪以夫先聖猶能採言於芻蕘 奚况布衣而不貴言乎故臣子之於君父則 有獻可替否諷諫之文知交之於朋友亦有 切磋琢磨相成之義君子若能聽言如響從 善如流則身安南山德茂松栢聲振金石名 流千載也    傷讒第三十二 譽者揚善之樞也毁者宣惡之機也揚善生 於性美宣惡出於情妬情美以成物爲恒情 妬以傷人爲務故譽以論善則辭以極善爲 功毁以譽過則言以窮惡爲巧何者俗人好 奇不奇不用也譽人不增其義則聞者不快 於心毁人不益其惡則聽者不滿於耳代之 善人少而惡人多則譽者寂寞而讒者諠譁 是以洗垢求痕吹毛覓瑕揮空爲有轉白爲 黑提輕當重引寸至尺墨子所以泣素絲  墨子者墨翟也悲蠶絲元素白被他色染
Interpretation

When a person is about to fall ill, they inevitably lose the ability to savor the taste of fish and meat; when a state is on the verge of collapse, its ruler inevitably refuses to heed loyal admonitions. Thus, the dying often claim there are no good physicians in the world, and doomed rulers insist their courts lack ministers bold enough to speak frankly. This is not because their ears are truly deaf—it is their hearts that reject honest counsel. The wise accept advice before problems take shape, heed warnings when misfortunes first sprout, embracing good words as smoothly as rolling a sphere, and shunning harmful actions as resolutely as avoiding enemies.

The ancient sage-kings placed exceptional emphasis on welcoming criticism: Emperor Yao established "admonition drums" for commoners to voice grievances, Emperor Shun erected "slander posts" for people to inscribe opinions, King Tang appointed officials solely to record faults, and King Wu of Zhou kept a warning drum to rouse his vigilance. These sage-kings, though supremely wise and inherently faultless, still opened wide channels for counsel—precisely to set an example for posterity. If even sages would listen to woodcutters' advice, how much more should ordinary people value others' suggestions? Between ministers and rulers, children and parents, or friends, frank admonition should prevail.

Concerning praise and slander: Commendation is the pivot that spreads good deeds, while defamation is the mechanism that disseminates malice. Human nature delights in praise, yet envy breeds slander. Ordinary people crave exaggerated speech—if praise isn’t amplified, listeners feel unsatisfied; if criticism isn’t magnified, they find it dull. Since this world has few virtuous people and many wicked ones, honest praise goes unheard while malicious slander clamors loudly. Some behave like deliberate fault-finders: inspecting washed items solely for stains, blowing apart hairs to pinpoint flaws, turning white into black, magnifying petty faults into grave crimes. When Mozi wept over plain silk (Mencius lamented how pristine silk could be easily dyed—a metaphor for truth’s corruption), he grieved precisely this distortion of reality.

 而隨色變乃爲青黄好人被讒成惡也 楊朱所以泣岐路  楊朱宋人也與人同行忽見岐路即慟之  謂此路岐曾有幾人合則也 以其變爲青黄迴成左右也昔人興讒言於 青蠅  魏武公信讒詞詩刺言曰營營青蠅止于  樊豈弟君子無信讒言言青蠅點白成黑  者也 譬利口於刃劎者以其點素成緇  緇墨色也 刀勁傷物故有四畏不可不愼鳥之曲頸鋩 距者羽類畏之獸之方喙鈎爪者毛群畏之 魚之哆(處紙尺/寫二切)脣鋸齒者鱗族畏之人之利 口讒諂者人共畏之讒嫉之人必好聞人惡 惡聞人善妬才智之在己前謩(音/居)  居妄也 富貴之在其上猶喉中有噎吞之思入目上 有翳决之願去吞决之情深則萋斐辭作故 揚娥眉者爲醜女之所妬行貞潔者爲讒邪 之所嫉昔直不疑未嘗有兄而讒者謂之盜 嫂  直不疑前漢人也于時讒說之逐嫂其人  既未嘗有兄何得有嫂而盜逐之也 第五倫三娶婚也孤女而世人譖其撾婦翁  第五倫後漢人也三娶孤女人讒說五倫  前時曾撾婦翁也 此聽虚而責響視空而索影悖情倒理誣罔 之甚也以二子之賢非身行之不潔與人有 讎也而不免於世謗者豈非獸惡其網人惡 其上耶故讒邪之蔽善人也猶朝日洞明霧 甚則不見天沙石至淨流濁則不見地雖有
Interpretation

This passage illustrates through multiple allusions how slander distorts truth and blackens reputations, and why people readily believe malicious gossip.

Yang Zhu (a Warring States period philosopher) once wept upon seeing a fork in the road, lamenting how life resembles diverging paths where different choices lead to entirely different outcomes. Just as the color green can turn yellow, so too can a good person's reputation be tarnished by slander until it becomes infamy.

The text cites a classic example from the Book of Songs satirizing Duke Wu of Wei for believing slander: "The buzzing flies alight on fences, just as slander turns white into black." It further compares slander to sharp blades that stain pure white silk black ("zī" meaning black).

The author enumerates four dreadful things creatures fear: birds dread raptors with curved necks and sharp talons; beasts fear predators with square maws and hooked claws; fish fear giant fish with split lips and jagged teeth; but what humans should fear most are silver-tongued slanderers. Such people delight in uncovering others' flaws while resenting hearing about virtues. When encountering those more talented or of higher status, they burn with envy—like trying to swallow a fishbone stuck in the throat or gouging out a cataract from the eye.

History records many virtuous individuals slandered: Zhi Buyi (a Western Han official), who had no elder brother, was falsely accused of adultery with his sister-in-law; Diwu Lun (an Eastern Han minister), who married orphaned women three times, was rumored to beat his fathers-in-law. Such slanders are as absurd as demanding echoes from emptiness or seeking shadows in barren land.

Final metaphors reveal how slander obscures truth: the brightest sun can be veiled by thick fog, the clearest river muddied by silt. When sages suffer calumny, it's not due to flawed character, but because—like beasts hating traps or commoners envying superiors—such is human nature.

明淨之質而不發明者水霧蔽之也蘭蓀欲 茂秋風害之賢哲欲正讒人敗之故讒者但 知害嫉於他人而不傷所說之主知傷所說 之主而不知還害其身故無極之讒子常蒙 謗郄費雙滅  無極姓費楚人爲晋大夫子常姓郄亦爲  晋大夫與無極同事晋晋君欲往子常家  無極誑子常曰晋君愛兵馬明日來向子  家子宜置精兵於門内晋君來見必當懽  喜子常信之遂貯兵於門内以待晋君來  晋君果至子常門無極謂晋君曰事不可  不知乎臣請先入觀望無極入門内便出  來啓曰子常門内具精兵欲襲君晋君怒  殺子常子常死又有人說乃是無極之教  晋君又殺無極故云子常蒙謗郄費雙滅  者也 讒謟之流斃一至於斯嗚呼後代之君子可不 愼諸也    愼隟第三十三 過者怨之梯也怨者禍之府也禍之所性必 由積怨過之所始多因忽小小過之來出乎 意表積怨之成在於慮外故其來也不可悔 其成也不可防防怨不宻而禍害臻焉故登 峭坂而不跌墜者愼于大也跨早垤  蟻封高壤垤土高寸曰封 而好顛蹷者輕於小也苟兢其步雖履除能 安輕易其足雖夷(平/也)路亦躓智者識輕小之 爲害故愼微細之危患每畏輕徵懔懔焉(敬/懼) (也)若朽索之馭陸馬也鴻毳性輕積之沉舟
Interpretation

The Liu Zi passage illustrates the destructive power of slander and the importance of preventing problems at their inception.

It begins with a historical anecdote: In the Jin state, ministers Wuji (of the Fei clan, originally from Chu) and Zichang (of the Xi clan) served together. When the Jin ruler expressed interest in visiting Zichang's residence, Wuji deceitfully advised Zichang: "Our lord enjoys military displays. When he visits tomorrow, you should station elite guards inside your gates—he'll be delighted." Zichang took the advice. Upon the ruler's arrival, Wuji first inspected the premises and emerged declaring: "Zichang has hidden troops plotting rebellion!" In rage, the ruler executed Zichang. Later when the scheme was exposed, Wuji too met execution—thus the famous case of "Dual Downfall of Xi and Fei."

The author laments: To think slander can wreak such havoc! How can later gentlemen not remain vigilant?

The text then expounds the principle of "guarding against cracks": Faults become steps to resentment; resentment forms the root of calamity. Disasters often arise from accumulated grievances, while faults frequently begin with neglected trivialities. Minor oversights often occur unexpectedly; deep resentments mostly form beyond our guard. Thus when calamity strikes, it cannot be undone; once formed, it defies prevention. Without rigorous defense against resentment, misfortune inevitably arrives.

Consider those who traverse steep slopes without falling—they succeed through caution toward great dangers. Yet some stumble over anthills through contempt for small things. With step-by-step vigilance, one walks dangerous paths safely; with careless underestimation, even level roads bring falls. The wise understand small hazards' potential, maintaining alertness toward subtle dangers like driving spirited horses with rotten reins. Though a goose feather weighs little, accumulated they can sink ships.

繒縞質薄叠之折軸以毳縞之輕微能敗舟 軸者積多之所致也故墻之崩隤必因其隟 劎之毁折皆猶于璺尺蚓穿堤能漂一邑寸 煙泄突致灰千室怨之始也微於隟璺及其 爲害大於墻劎禍之所傷甚于邑室將防其 萌急於水火夏書曰怨豈在明不見是圖故 怨不在天亦不在小熒熒不滅能焚崑山涓 涓不絶能成江河怨之所生不可類推禍之 所延非可猜測或怨大而成小或憾輕而至 重深讎不必危而睚眥未可易也譬如風焉 披雲飛石卷水𢴺木而人血脉不爲之傷鄛 穴之風輕塵不動毛髮不摇及中肌膚以爲 深疾大不爲害小而成患者大風散漫小風 激射也故漢祖免貫高之逆  貫高爲趙王相欲殺高祖於栢人亭高祖  行至栢人亭欲宿心動問左右名何亭左  右曰此是栢人亭高祖曰栢人亭者遏迫  於人遂疾夜遁得免貫高之害後人告高  祖曰貫高於栢人亭欲殺高祖貫高之徒  黨齊告二十人皆自死貫高曰今並自取  死無人明趙王無罪於是一人告高祖高  祖將貫高付獄獄吏打一千餘鞭終不欵  承言趙王不反高祖乃自問取其實狀貫  高乃報高祖趙王不反乃放貫高亦釋貫  高貫高曰欲殺大王有何面目食人之禄  爲人之臣遂坑而死者也  魏后泄張繡之讎 魏后是曹操也與袁紹爭天下張繡是袁
Interpretation

This scripture employs multiple metaphors and historical allusions to expound the principle that "small grievances accumulate into great calamities":

Using analogies like piled silk eventually breaking a cart's axle, wall cracks leading to collapse, or sword flaws causing breakage, it illustrates how minor issues can accumulate into major disasters. Just as earthworms can bore through dams to cause floods, or a small chimney leak may spark a great fire, grievances often begin as trivial matters but develop into dangers far greater than collapsed walls or broken swords.

The Book of Documents states that grievances need not be obvious—one should guard against them before they manifest. Grievances know no size distinction: a single spark can burn down Mount Kunlun, and tiny streams converge into mighty rivers. The consequences of resentment are unpredictable—sometimes minor grudges erupt into catastrophes, while deep-seated hatred may remain harmless. Like how gale winds scatter clouds and roll boulders yet cannot harm the human body, while gentle breezes seem harmless yet penetrate the skin to cause illness.

Two historical examples are cited: First, Emperor Gaozu of Han narrowly avoided assassination at Boren Pavilion through intuition; later, the would-be assassin Guan Gao committed suicide to prove Prince of Zhao's innocence. Second, Cao Cao (later Emperor Wei) killed Zhang Xiu (a general allied with Yuan Shao) due to personal enmity, with grave consequences. Both cases demonstrate how minor resentments can trigger major disasters.

 紹下軍將與曹操格戰捉得曹操愛子遂  斬之後袁紹破兵馬離散繡來投於曹操  許褚謂之曰與君當投於吴繡曰不可褚  曰君何不可殺人愛子如何欲投之繡曰  曹君爲人大志必能併天下之位我殺其  子私讎也其後必能吞吴大丈夫可再辱  乎遂投操操捉得繡來乃指其面曰使我  著大信於天下者子也任以爲將泄其先  罪泄漏也隱漏其先罪也 韓信削少年之辱  韓信淮隂人也不事生業不營一食好帶  長劎於淮隂市中有一少年辱之曰君帶  長劎能殺人乎若能殺人可殺我也若不  能可從我跨下過韓信聞之乆視於少年  計殺之無益屈身從跨下過後高祖任爲  大將軍信召市中少年語之曰汝昔年欺  我今日可欺乎少年乞命信免之罪與之  一效官也 安國釋田甲之慢  安國是韓安國也爲梁太史坐法在獄中  被獄吏田甲辱之安國曰寒灰亦有然否  田甲曰寒灰儻然我即尿其上自後安國  得釋放任梁州刺史獄吏田甲驚走安國  曰若走必族誅之若不走赦其罪田甲遂  見安國安國笑謂曰寒灰今日燃汝何不  尿其上田甲愧前罪驚惶無已遂與田甲  廷尉之官今日司馬是也 此皆遇英達之主寬廓之衿得以深怨而不 爲讎也魯酒薄而邯鄲圍  六國之時楚霸諸侯總來朝楚趙亦朝楚
Interpretation

This passage recounts several historical figures who demonstrated wisdom and magnanimity when faced with humiliation and enmity.

Xu Chu, a general under Yuan Shao, killed Cao Cao’s beloved son in battle. Later, when Yuan Shao was defeated, Xu Chu considered defecting to Eastern Wu. Someone warned him, "You killed Cao Cao’s son—how could you possibly seek refuge with him?" But Xu Chu believed Cao Cao had grand ambitions and would not let personal vendettas interfere with greater affairs. In the end, he defected to Cao Cao, who indeed bore no grudge and instead entrusted him with important duties, saying, "It is precisely because of you that I can demonstrate magnanimity to the world."

When Han Xin was young, a local ruffian in Huaiyin publicly humiliated him, forcing him to crawl between his legs. Han Xin endured the disgrace, and later, after rising to become a great general, he sought out the same man. Rather than seeking revenge, he appointed him to an official post.

Han Anguo, while imprisoned, was mocked by a jailer named Tian Jia, who boasted that if Han ever regained power, he would urinate on him. Later, when Han Anguo was released and appointed to high office, Tian Jia fled in terror. Instead of retaliating, Han merely joked, "Now that the embers have reignited, why don’t you make good on your promise?" In the end, he pardoned Tian Jia.

These stories illustrate that under enlightened rulers and broad-minded individuals, even deep-seated grudges can be resolved. Contrast this with the petty behavior of the Chu state during the Warring States period, which attacked Handan in Zhao simply because it disliked Lu’s wine—a display of narrow-mindedness. True heroes, like Cao Cao, Han Xin, and Han Anguo, know how to set aside personal grievances to achieve greatness.

 皆上牛酒趙王酒美楚王吏來就趙王索  酒趙王不與此酒未上楚王曰楚王未得  故不與吏乃於趙王上酒訖吏乃以魯侯  薄酒换趙王美酒進王曰趙王薄酒楚王  飲之大怒曰到來在後輕我一也酒來又  薄輕我二也諸侯會罷遂乃興兵圍邯鄲  邯鄲即趙王城也 羊羹偏而宋師敗  宋使華元將兵伐鄭明日欲戰乃殺羊爲  羹以會將士有御車人羊斟不得羹明日  與鄭戰羊斟者謂華元曰前日之羹子爲  政今日之事我爲政遂引華元車奔鄭軍  中宋軍大敗華元被鄭囚宋人以金銀珍  寳贖華元彼語羊斟曰前者車奔入鄭爲  是馬佚而子不禁所以言者恐宋軍誅羊  斟也 郈孫以鬭雞亡身  郈昭伯與季平子鬭鷄平子爲其雞作金  距昭伯以芥子粉灑其雞翼使芥子粉飛  着平子雞眼雞便退走自後乃知責郈孫  曰君何以芥子粉粉雞翼令着我雞眼昭  伯曰君雞何以着金距各相忿怒遂興兵  大戰數日平子乃殺昭伯也 齊侯以笑嬪破國  晋遣大夫郄尅使齊尅足跛齊侯欲謔之  遂於廊下設幕使嬪妾晝於幕中初郄尅  跛而上殿嬪妾於幕中一時大笑尅被笑  忿怒還晋乃將兵伐齊遂破齊國此皆輕  小事破國亡身者也 皆以輕蔑細怨忘樹禍端以酒食戲笑之故 敗國滅身爲天下笑不愼死也代之闇者皆
Interpretation

This passage recounts several historical anecdotes where minor incidents escalated into major disasters:

During a banquet hosted by the King of Zhao, an envoy from Chu requested fine wine but was refused. Later, the Chu envoy secretly replaced the fine wine that Zhao had prepared as tribute to Chu with inferior liquor. When the King of Chu drank the poor-quality wine, he became furious, believing Zhao had insulted him twice, and consequently sent troops to besiege Handan (modern Hebei), the Zhao capital.

Before a battle, the Song general Hua Yuan slaughtered sheep to feast his troops but neglected to share any with his charioteer Yang Zhen. The next day during combat, the resentful Yang deliberately drove their chariot into enemy lines, causing Song's defeat and Hua Yuan's capture. Afterwards, Yang deceitfully claimed the horses had bolted.

During a cockfight between Marquis Zhao of Lu and Ji Pingzi, one equipped his rooster with metal spurs while the other coated his bird's wings with mustard powder. Their mutual resentment over this escalated into armed conflict, resulting in Marquis Zhao's death.

The ruler of Qi, seeking amusement, intentionally had concubines hide behind curtains to mock the limping Jin envoy Xi Ke. Humiliated, Xi returned home and later led Jin's army to attack Qi, inflicting a crushing defeat.

These are classic examples of how disregarding small matters and nursing petty grievances can invite catastrophe. Some brought about national ruin, personal destruction, and became laughingstocks throughout the land - all over a cup of wine, a bowl of meat broth, a cockfight, or a few mocking words. Such tragedies stemmed entirely from failing to handle minor affairs with proper caution.

以小害易微之事以至於大患禍之至也人 自生之福之來也人自成之禍與福同門害 與利同鄰若非至精莫能分矣是以智慮者 禍福之門户動靜者利害之樞機不可不愼 也    誡盈第三十四 四時之序節滿即謝五行之性功成必退故 陽極而隂降隂極而陽升日中則昃月盈則 虧此天之常道也  日中則昃月盈則虧人矯尅亡器滿必覆  故以誡盈名篇之美也 勢積則損財聚必散年盛返衰樂極還悲此 之恒也昔仲尼觀欹器而革容  周公廟中有祭器常傾欹不正號之欹器  太滿則傾不滿亦欹惟平則正矣孔子於  周公廟見之問主器曰此器何名曰欹器  孔子曰我聞欹器太滿則傾不滿亦欹惟  平則正孔子於是發嘆改其心嘘曰古人  制之以約後代人愼傾滿使各得其分也 鑒損益而歎息此察象而識類覩霜而知冰 也夫知進而不知退則踐盈泛之危處存而 不亡危必履泰山之安故雷在天上曰大壯 山在地中曰謙謙則裒多損寡壯則非禮勿 履處壯而能用禮居謙而能益降高以就卑 抑强而同弱未有抱損而不光驕盈而不斃 者也聖人知盛滿之難恃每居德而謙冲雖 聦明叡智而志愈下富貴廣大而心愈降勳 蓋天下而情愈惕不以德厚而矜物不以身 尊而驕民故楚莊王功立而心懼晋文公戰
Interpretation

The text from Liu Zi primarily elucidates the principle that fortune and misfortune are interdependent, and that things reverse upon reaching their extremes, while emphasizing the importance of humility and moderation in human conduct.

Minor issues, if neglected, may escalate into major calamities. Fortune and misfortune share the same origin, just as benefit and harm are mutually dependent—only the exceptionally wise can discern this clearly. A person's thoughts and actions are the key determinants of their fortune or misfortune, and thus must be treated with caution.

Like the cyclical alternation of the four seasons and the operation of the Five Phases (Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, Water), when things reach their zenith, they inevitably reverse: the sun begins to decline westward at its zenith, and the moon wanes after becoming full—this is the natural order. Excessive accumulation of wealth leads to loss, the prime of life is inevitably followed by aging, and extreme joy gives way to sorrow.

When Confucius saw a ritual vessel called the "Tilting Vessel" (欹器) in the temple of the Duke of Zhou, he observed that it tilted when empty and overturned when filled with water, remaining upright only when the water level was moderate. Reflecting on this, Confucius remarked that the ancients crafted this vessel to admonish future generations about the importance of restraint and maintaining balance.

To know advancement but not retreat is as perilous as standing on the edge of a brimming vessel. Only those who remain vigilant in times of peace can be as stable as Mount Tai. In the Book of Changes, the hexagram "Great Strength" (大壮) symbolizes thunder in the heavens, representing vigor, while the hexagram "Modesty" (谦) depicts a mountain beneath the earth, signifying humility. The humble understand how to reduce excess, while the strong know to refrain from overstepping. Those who maintain propriety despite their strength and assist others while remaining modest will invariably succeed, whereas the arrogant and complacent are doomed to fail.

Sages comprehend the principle that prosperity inevitably gives way to decline. Even after achieving great merit, they remain humble—like King Zhuang of Chu, who grew cautious after accomplishing mighty deeds, or Duke Wen of Jin, who became more circumspect following military victories. They neither grew arrogant due to their profound virtue nor looked down upon others because of their exalted status. This teaches us that true wisdom lies in understanding restraint and preserving humility.

勝而色憂非憎榮而惡勝乃功大而心小居 安而念危也夏禹一饋而七起周公一沐而 三握食不遑飽沐不及晞非耐饑而樂勞是 能心急於接士處于謙光也易曰以貴下賤 大得民也是以君子高而能卑富而能儉貴 而能賤智而能愚勇而能怯辯而能訥博而 能淺明而能闇是謂損而不窮也    明謙第三十五 天道下濟而光明江湖善下而爲王故山在 地中成謙王侯以孤寡爲損謙則榮而逾高 損則顯而彌貴高必以下爲基貴則以賤爲 本在貴而忘貴故能以貴下民處高而遺高 故能高而就卑是以大壯往則復天地之謙 也極昇必降隂陽之謙也滿終則虧日月之 謙也道盈體冲聖人之謙也易稱謙尊而彌 光老子云不伐故有功謙者在於降己以高 從卑以聖從鄙不伐在於有功不矜在於有 德不言歸於冲退謙挹之流也好盈自賢矜 功伐善者俗之恒情聖人之惡也必矜其功 雖賞之而稱勞情猶不足苟伐其善雖與之 賞多必怨其少則慊望之情生躁競之色見 矜伐之路開患難之釁作矣君子則不然在 榮以挹損爲基有功而不矜有善而不伐遺 其功而功常存忘其善而善自全情常忘善 故能以善卜物情恒存善故欲以善勝人是 以情存功善非心謙也口虚托謙豈非矯乎 以善勝物心遺功善非矜伐也口及其善豈
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist wisdom of "humility," illustrating through multiple dimensions the importance of maintaining modesty.

It begins with historical examples: Yu the Great (Da Yu) would interrupt his meal seven times to attend to state affairs, and the Duke of Zhou would pause while washing his hair three times to receive worthy scholars. They did not enjoy hunger or exhaustion but prioritized honoring the virtuous over personal comfort. The Book of Changes (Yijing) states, "The noble who humbles themselves to serve the lowly truly wins the people’s hearts." Thus, a true noble person should embody the following: holding high status yet remaining humble, being wealthy yet frugal, esteemed yet approachable, wise yet appearing simple, courageous yet showing caution, eloquent yet seeming reserved, learned yet appearing unassuming, and brilliant yet concealing their sharpness. This is the genuine wisdom of "diminishing without exhausting."

Next, it employs natural metaphors: the Dao of Heaven shines downward to illuminate all things, and rivers and seas remain low to gather countless streams. Mountains hidden within the earth appear even more majestic, and kings and lords who call themselves "solitary" or "humble" only enhance their dignity. All nobility is rooted in humility—true leaders do not put on airs, for only then can they genuinely guide the people. As the Book of Changes says, "The humble are exalted," and Laozi also teaches, "Only by not boasting can one achieve merit."

True humility lies in willingly lowering oneself, as sages willingly dwell in simplicity. Yet worldly people love to boast—the slightest accomplishment must be flaunted, and no reward ever feels sufficient; if they trumpet their good deeds, no recognition seems enough. This competitive mindset only breeds conflict.

The noble person, however, is entirely different: they restrain themselves in moments of glory, neither flaunting achievements nor broadcasting virtue. Precisely because they do not strive for recognition, their merits endure; by forgetting their own goodness, their virtue becomes complete. This is not feigned modesty but a genuine transcendence of attachment to fame and merit. To speak of humility while secretly competing is hypocrisy; to inspire others through good deeds without claiming credit is true De (Virtue).

非實乎故心存功善非心謙也口雖不言未 免矜伐心捨功善口雖明言無傷於廉故夏 禹昌言明稱伐功咎繇陳謨云說我惠豈其 矜功而存惠哉夫言善非伐而伐善者每稱 其能言惠非矜而矜惠者常存其惠聖人知 人情尚賢而好伐故發言裁典多由謙退所 以棄其驕誇競垂世則也    大質第三十六 火之性也大寒慘悽凝冰裂地而炎氣不爲 之衰大熱烜赫燋金爍石而炎氣不爲之熾 者何也有自然之質而寒者不能移也故丹 可磨而不可奪其色蘭可燔而不可滅其馨 玉可碎而不可改其白金可銷而不可易其 剛各抱自然之性非可强變者也士有忠義 之性懷貞直之操不移之質亦如兹者也是 以生苟背道不以爲利死必合義不足爲害 故不趨利而逃害不忻生而憾死不可以威 協而變其操不可以利誘而易其心昔子閭 之劫也擬之白刃而其心不傾  楚白公勝作亂殺子西又劫子閭謂子閭  曰同我者即免不同我者即殺乃以白刃  擬刺子閭而子閭亦不同故云不趨而逃  害也 晏嬰之盟也鈎以曲戟而其志不迴  崔杼殺齊君使人將鐵鈎鈎晏嬰項欲與  立盟共爲要誓晏子終竟不同崔杼作亂  也 不可以利害趨其情矣夫士有忠義之行踐 繩墨之節其於爲作乃無異於衆人及至處
Interpretation

This passage explores two core principles: the conduct of sages and the steadfast character of loyal individuals.

Regarding proper conduct, the author observes: Some people appear humble outwardly but do not truly possess humility in their hearts, merely refraining from speaking of their merits. Yet truly virtuous individuals can openly discuss their good deeds without compromising their integrity. For instance, Yu the Great spoke openly about his achievements in flood control, and Gao Yao (a legendary minister) articulated his governance strategies while acknowledging his own contributions—this was not boasting. The sages understood humanity's tendency to admire virtue yet indulge in self-praise, hence they emphasized humility in ritual codes to counteract arrogance.

The second part employs natural metaphors to illustrate moral character: A fierce fire does not diminish its heat in bitter cold nor blaze excessively in scorching heat—this reflects its unchanging nature. Just as cinnabar cannot be ground to lose its redness, orchids retain their fragrance when burned, jade remains pure when shattered, and gold stays unyielding when melted, so too do loyal individuals uphold their principles unshaken by life or death. They will not compromise righteousness for gain nor abandon their convictions out of fear.

Historical examples reinforce this: When Bai Gong Sheng of Chu rebelled and threatened Zi Lü with a blade to force cooperation, Zi Lü chose death over submission. Similarly, when Cui Zhu of Qi assassinated his ruler and tried to coerce Yan Ying into alliance with threats, Yan Ying remained unyielding. These cases demonstrate that true loyalty cannot be swayed by coercion or temptation.

The author emphasizes that such individuals may appear ordinary in daily life, but their unwavering integrity in critical moments—like an unbroken ink-line of moral rectitude—sets them apart. This is what elevates them beyond common people.

(Note: While this text discusses moral philosophy rather than explicitly Daoist concepts, the translation maintains the original's classical Chinese philosophical tone, with natural transitions and parallel structures preserved. Key cultural terms like "Yu the Great," "Gao Yao," and historical figures are rendered directly with contextual clarity.)

患蹈難而志氣貞剛然後知其殊也譬如鍾 山之玉  鍾山在會稽也 寒嶺之松比之瓀珉梓柳無殊也  瓀珉似玉入火即銷梓是楸柳是楊柳也 及其燒以爐炭三日而色不改處於積水終 歲而枝葉不凋然後知其異於他玉衆木也 故袒裼暴虎而後勇氣發焉超騰絶坂而後 迅梗露焉手提萬鈞而後多力見焉處難踐 患而後貞勇出焉不用干將以知其銳也不 引烏號奚以知其勁也  烏號是角桑之木爲弓也黄帝殿前有桑  樹上有長條烏飛集其上烏起未高條返  彈烏烏乃號因名烏號黄帝見之曰此木  應堪材用也遂取爲弓極美妙故曰烏號  弓說文云黄帝於鼎湖山上得仙人遺弓  一張群臣見之一時號哭因曰烏號弓又  云南嶺山有柘木烏每日在其上鳴因名  之烏號弓也 勁銳之質卓然易見猶因人獲顯况乃志行 難覩曷得不因
Interpretation

This passage illustrates through metaphor how a person's true character is often revealed only through arduous trials. Just as the fine jade from Zhong Mountain (located in the Kuaiji region) and the pine trees growing on cold ridges appear no different from ordinary stones and trees under normal circumstances. Those stones resembling jade (ruǎn mín) melt when exposed to fire, while common catalpas and willows remain unremarkable.

But genuine Zhong Mountain jade shows no discoloration even after three days in a furnace, and cold ridge pines submerged in stagnant water for an entire year retain their verdant foliage without withering—only then does their distinction from other jades and trees become evident. Similarly, a person's true qualities emerge through hardship: bare-handed combat with a fierce tiger reveals courage, scaling steep cliffs demonstrates agility, lifting immense weights proves strength, and enduring adversity showcases steadfastness and bravery.

The text also mentions two renowned artifacts of antiquity: the Ganjiang sword and the Wuhao bow. One need not wield Ganjiang to recognize its sharpness, nor draw the Wuhao bow to understand its power. The Wuhao bow has an extraordinary origin—legend tells of a mulberry tree before the Yellow Emperor's palace, whose branches could launch crows into flight. When startled, the crows emitted a "hao" (howling) cry, hence the name. The Yellow Emperor discovered this wood was exceptionally suited for crafting bows, resulting in the supremely refined Wuhao bow. Another version holds that the Wuhao bow was a divine relic the Yellow Emperor obtained at Mount Dinghu, while yet another attributes its name to the frequent crow calls heard from southern ridge mulberry trees.

Just as superior timber and keen weaponry are easily recognized, though human aspirations and conduct may not be directly visible, they become clearly manifest through concrete events. This passage emphasizes the importance of practice and testing in discerning the essence of things.

事而後明乎 劉子卷之七

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5d0053); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 6 Vol. 8 →