中文 · EN

《淮南鴻烈解》Vol. 19

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taiqing 太清部 Vol. 19 / 29 12,420 characters

About this page. The original text of 《淮南鴻烈解》 Vol. 19 (Taiqing 太清部, 29 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 24 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《淮南鴻烈解》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

淮南鴻烈解卷之十八神四     太尉祭酒臣許愼記上    道應訓(道之所行物動而應考/之禍福以知驗符也) 太清問於無窮(太清元氣之清者/也無窮無形也)曰子知道 乎無窮曰吾弗知也又問於無爲(無爲有形/而不爲也) 曰子知道乎無爲曰吾知道(無爲有形/故知道也)子之 知道亦有數乎無爲曰吾知道有數曰其數 柰何無爲曰吾知道之可以弱可以强可以 柔可以剛可以隂可以陽可以窈可以明可 以包裹天地可以應待無方此吾所以知道 之數也太清又問於無始(無始未始/有之氣也)曰鄉者 吾問道於無窮曰吾弗知之又問於無爲無 爲曰吾知道曰子之知道亦有數乎無爲曰 吾知道有數曰其數柰何無爲曰吾知道之 可以弱可以强可以柔可以剛可以隂可以 陽可以窈可以明可以包裹天地可以應待 無方吾所以知道之數也若是則無爲知與 無窮之弗知孰是孰非無始曰弗知之深而 知之淺弗知内而知之外弗知精而知之粗 太清仰而嘆曰然則不知乃知邪知乃不知 邪孰知知之爲弗知弗知之爲知邪無始曰 道不可聞聞而非也道不可見見而非也道 不可言言而非也孰知形之不形者乎故老 子曰天下皆知善之爲善斯不善也故知者 不言言者不知也白公問於孔子曰人可以
Interpretation

Huainan Honglie Jie, Volume 18, “Shen” (Spirit), Part Four: Daoying Xun (Vernacular Interpretation)

Huainan Honglie Jie, Volume 18, “Shen,” Part Four

Recorded above by the Grand Commandant’s Libationer, subject Xu Shen

Daoying Xun

(Explanation: How the Dao operates—whenever the myriad things move, there is a responsive resonance; misfortune and blessing are used to test whether they conform to tally-verification.)

Taiqing (Great Clarity)—Taiqing is the purest layer of primordial Qi—asked Wuqiong (Infinite)—Wuqiong is without fixed form: Do you know the Dao?

Wuqiong said: I do not know.

He then asked Wuwei (Non-action)—Wuwei has form but does not act recklessly: Do you know the Dao?

Wuwei said: I know the Dao. Because Wuwei has form, he says he knows the Dao.

He asked again: Since you know the Dao, are there countable items in it?

Wuwei said: I know that the Dao has numbers.

He asked: What are those numbers?

Wuwei said: I know the Dao can manifest as weak, and it can manifest as strong; it can be soft, and it can be hard; it can be Yin, and it can be Yang; it can be dark, and it can be bright; it can encompass Heaven and Earth, and it can respond to endless transformations—these are what I call “the numbers of the Dao.”

Taiqing then asked Wushi (No Beginning)—Wushi is the primordial Qi that has not yet entered the stage of “beginning to exist”:

A moment ago I asked Wuqiong, and he said he did not know; I then asked Wuwei, and Wuwei said he knew.

He asked again: Do you know the Dao, and are there numbers in it?

Wuwei repeated the same set as before: “It can be weak, it can be strong…”

Wushi said: If that is so, between Wuwei’s “knowing” and Wuqiong’s “not knowing,” which is right and which is wrong?

Wushi said: “Not knowing” is deep; “knowing” is instead shallow. “Not knowing” is inside; “knowing” falls outside. “Not knowing” is refined; “knowing” is only coarse.

Taiqing looked up and sighed: Then not-knowing is knowing? And knowing is instead not-knowing? Who can determine that “knowing” is actually not-knowing, and “not-knowing” is actually knowing?

Wushi said:

The Dao cannot be grasped by hearing—once heard, it is not the true Dao.

The Dao cannot be fixed by the eyes—once seen, it is not the true Dao.

The Dao cannot be fully expressed in words—once spoken, it is not the true Dao.

Who can understand “the formless above the formed”?

Therefore Laozi said: When all under Heaven know that the good is good, that “good” is no longer pure.

He also said: Those who know do not speak; those who speak do not know.

Lord Bai asked Confucius: Can people…

Reading Note (corresponding to Xu Shen-style commentary):

This chapter has Taiqing ask Wuqiong, Wuwei, and Wushi in turn, personifying three kinds of Qi: Wuqiong presides over the formless, so he calls himself not-knowing; Wuwei has form and can respond, so he calls himself a knowing that has numbers; Wushi finally exposes the point—clinging to a countable, speakable “knowing” is instead shallow, external, and coarse; true accord with the Dao is close to “not-knowing” (fu zhi). This is tied together with the thread in the Dao De Jing: “Those who know do not speak” and “When all under Heaven know the good as good.” It belongs to the Huainan school’s exposition of “the Dao’s responses” and “knowing and not-knowing.”

微言(白公楚平王孫太子建勝也建見/殺白公怨而欲復讎故問微言也)孔子 不應(知白公有隂/謀故不應也)白公曰若以石投水中何 如曰吴越之善没者能取之矣曰若以水投 水何如孔子曰菑澠之水合易牙嘗而知之 (菑澠齊/二水也)白公曰然則人固不可與微言乎孔 子曰何謂不可誰知言之謂者乎夫知言之 謂者不以言言也(不以言/心知之)爭魚者濡逐獸者 趍非樂之也故至言去言至爲無爲夫淺知 之所爭者末矣白公不得也故死於浴室(楚/殺) (白公於浴/室之地也)故老子曰言有宗事有君夫唯無 知是以不吾知也白公之謂也惠子爲惠王 爲國法(惠王梁惠王/惠子惠施也)已成而示諸先生先生 皆善之奏之惠王惠王甚說之以示翟煎曰 善惠王曰善可行乎翟煎曰不可惠王曰善 而不可行何也翟煎對曰今夫舉大木者前 呼邪許後亦應之此舉重勸力之歌也豈無 鄭衛激楚之音哉然而不用者不若此其宜 也治國有禮不在文辯故老子曰法令滋彰 盜賊多有此之謂也田駢以道術說齊王(田/駢) (齊人/齊臣)王應之曰寡人所有齊國也道術難以 除患願聞國之政田駢對曰臣之言無政而 可以爲政譬之若林木無材而可以爲村願 王察其所謂而自取齊國之政焉已雖無除
Interpretation

Vernacular Interpretation

The “Subtle Words” Section (Duke Bai Asks Confucius)

Duke Bai (grandson of King Ping of Chu and son of Crown Prince Jian; after Jian was murdered, Duke Bai harbored thoughts of revenge, and so asked about “subtle words”) asked Confucius, and Confucius did not respond (Confucius perceived that Duke Bai had a conspiracy, and so did not answer).

Duke Bai asked: What happens if you throw a stone into water? Confucius said: Those in Wu and Yue skilled at diving can retrieve it.

He asked again: What if you throw water into water? Confucius said: When the Zi and Sheng rivers merge, Yiya knows it with a single taste (the Zi and Sheng are two rivers in Qi).

Duke Bai said: Then in the end one cannot speak subtle and wondrous words with them? Confucius said: What do you mean by cannot? Who knows the one who can understand “subtle words”? One who truly understands subtle words does not speak with mouth and tongue (does not show off with words, but knows through the heart). Those who fight over fish get their clothes wet; those who chase animals must run; it is not that they love wetness or love running, but the nature of the matter makes it so. Therefore the utmost words are close to no words, and the utmost action is close to Wuwei (non-action). Those who contend with words within shallow understanding contend only over branch tips. Duke Bai did not awaken to this, and in the end died in a bathhouse (the men of Chu killed Duke Bai in a bathhouse). Hence Laozi said: “Words have a source, affairs have a ruler”; and also, “It is only because of non-knowing that I am not known”—Duke Bai was exactly this type.


Huizi Establishes the Laws and Zhai Jian

Huizi (Hui Shi) established the state laws for King Hui (King Hui is King Hui of Liang; Huizi’s name was Hui Shi). When the laws were completed, he showed them to the assembled elders; the elders all praised them. They were submitted to King Hui, who was very pleased, and he then showed them to Zhai Jian. Zhai Jian said: Good. King Hui asked: Good—can they be implemented? Zhai Jian said: They cannot. King Hui asked: Good, yet they cannot be implemented—why? Zhai Jian answered: Now when lifting a great log, those in front call out “xie xu” and those behind respond; this is a work song for exerting strength in lifting something heavy. Are there not the stirring Chu melodies of Zheng and Wei? Yet when lifting logs they do not use those, simply because the work chant better suits the task. Governing a state depends on the root of ritual and law, not on rhetorical phrases and disputation. Hence Laozi said, “The more laws and decrees are promulgated, the more thieves and robbers there are”—this exactly refers to this principle.


Tian Pian Persuades the King of Qi

Tian Pian (a man of Qi and a minister of Qi) expounded the arts of the Dao (the Way) to the King of Qi. The king replied: What I have is the state of Qi; the arts of the Dao are difficult to use directly to remove troubles. I wish to hear the government that orders the state. Tian Pian answered: Although what I say does not speak of concrete administrative affairs, it can still be used for government. For example, trees and wood are not in themselves implements, yet they can be made into implements. May the king carefully examine what I say and select for himself what can be used in the government of Qi. Although Tian Pian had no explicit name of “removing troubles,” his purport was contained in it.

其患天地之間六合之内可陶而變化也齊 國之政何足問哉此老聃之所謂無狀之狀 無物之象者也若王之所問者齊也田駢所 稱者材也材不及林林不及雨(雨然後材/乃得生也)雨 不及隂陽隂陽不及和和不及道(道者末之/由生之本) (也)白公勝得荆國不能以府庫分人(白公篡/得楚國) (貪其材而不分人/也得積七日也)七日石乙入曰(石乙白公/之黨也) 不義得之又不能布施患必至矣不能予人 不若焚之毋令人害我白公弗聽也九日葉 公入(葉公楚大夫子高自方/城之外入殺白公也)乃發大府之貨 以予衆出高庫之兵以賦民因而攻之十有 九日而擒白公(葉公殺/白公也)夫國非其有也而欲 有之可謂至貪也不能爲人又無以自爲可 謂至愚矣譬白公之嗇也何以異於梟之愛 其子也(梟子長/食其母)故老子曰持而盈之不如其 已揣而銳之不可長保也趙簡子以襄子爲 後董閼子曰無卹賤(董閼子趙氏臣也無卹/襄子之名簡子之庶子) (也)今以爲後何也簡子曰是爲人也能爲社 稷忍羞(襄子能柔/能忍耻也)異日知伯與襄子飲而批 襄子之首大夫請殺之襄子曰先君之立我 也曰能爲社稷忍羞豈曰能刺人哉處十月 知伯圍襄子於晋陽襄子疏隊而擊之(䟽分/也隊)
Interpretation

Vernacular Interpretation of the Huainan Honglie Jie

What he actually worried about was this: between Heaven and Earth, within the six directions, the myriad things can all be shaped and changed. What was there in the petty government of Qi worth making a topic of discussion? This is precisely what Laozi called “the form of no fixed form, the image of no concrete image”—it speaks of the more fundamental great Dao, not the branch details of one state or one government.

The Great King asked about Qi, while Tian Pian boasted of cai (talent, timber, and the like). But cai cannot be separated from the “forest,” and the “forest” cannot be separated from “rain”—only with rain can timber grow. Pushing further upward: rain cannot be separated from Yin-Yang, Yin-Yang cannot be separated from “harmony,” and “harmony” cannot be separated from the Dao. The Dao is the root from which the myriad things arise, the source of all branch particulars.

Bai Gong Sheng usurped Chu, yet could not bear to distribute the goods and property in the treasuries to the people—he coveted the state’s cai (resources) and refused to share them with others. He hoarded in this way for seven days. On the seventh day, his follower Shi Yi advised: what is gained unjustly and cannot be given away will surely bring disaster; since you cannot give it to others, better to burn it, lest others use it to harm us. Bai Gong did not listen. On the ninth day, Duke Ye (Zigao, a Chu minister) led troops from outside Fangcheng into Chu, opened the great treasury’s goods and wealth and distributed them to the crowd, issued the weapons from the high storehouse to the people, and then raised troops to attack Bai Gong; after nineteen days he captured Bai Gong (Duke Ye killed Bai Gong).

The state did not originally belong to him, yet he wanted to monopolize it—this is extreme greed; he could neither bestow benefits on others nor preserve himself—this is extreme folly. How was Bai Gong’s stinginess any different from the owl’s “loving its young”?—the owl’s offspring, when grown, will peck and eat the mother bird. (This metaphor means that Bai Gong only knew how to guard wealth and in the end brought about his own death.)

Therefore Laozi said: “To hold a vessel brimming full is not as good as stopping; to sharpen a point to keenness cannot be long preserved.”—Forcing a vessel to be held completely full is not as good as knowing when to stop; grinding an edge too sharp makes it hard to preserve for long.

Zhao Jianzi established his concubine-born son Wuxu (Xiangzi) as heir. Dong Ezi said: Wuxu is of low birth; why establish him? Jianzi answered: This man can endure humiliation for the state. Later, Zhi Bo drank with Xiangzi and struck Xiangzi’s head with a vessel, injuring him. The ministers asked to kill Zhi Bo. Xiangzi said: When the former ruler established me, he said I could endure shame for the state, not that I would kill people. In the tenth month, Zhi Bo besieged Xiangzi at Jinyang, and Xiangzi dispersed his ranks and attacked (shu dui means dividing troops into formation and responding flexibly).

(軍二百人爲一隊/分斯隊卒擊之)大敗知伯破其首以爲飲 器故老子曰知其雄守其雌其爲天下谿齧 缺問道於被衣(齧缺被衣皆/堯時老人也)被衣曰正女形 壹女視天和將至攝女知正女度神將來舍 德將來附若美而道將爲女居惷乎若新生 之犢而無求其故言未卒齧缺繼以讎夷(讎/夷) (熟視/不言)被衣行歌而去曰形若槁骸心如死灰 直實知不以故自持墨墨恢恢無心可與謀 彼何人哉故老子曰明白四達能無以知乎 趙襄子攻翟而勝之尤人終人(尤人終人/翟之二邑)使 者來謁之襄子方將食而有憂色左右曰一 朝而兩城下此人之所喜也今君有憂色何 也襄子曰江河之大也不過三日(三日/而滅)飄風 暴雨日中不須臾(言其不/終日)今趙氏之德行無 所積今一朝兩城下亡其及我乎孔子聞之 曰趙氏其昌乎夫憂所以爲昌也而喜所以 爲亡也勝非其難者也賢主以此持勝故其 福及後世齊楚吴越皆嘗勝矣然而卒取亡 焉不通乎持勝也唯有道之主能持勝孔子 勁杓國門之關(杓引也古者縣門下/從上杓引之者難也)而不肯 以力聞墨子爲守攻公輸般服而不肯以兵 知(墨子雖善爲兵而/不肯以知兵聞也)善持勝者以强爲弱故 老子曰道沖而用之又弗盈也惠孟見宋康
Interpretation

Vernacular Reading of Huainan Honglie Explained

(Zhi Bo’s army was organized into units of two hundred; Zhao Xiangzi assigned troops from each unit to attack in turn,) and they decisively defeated Zhi Bo, cut off his head, and made it into a drinking vessel. Therefore Laozi says: “Knowing the masculine and keeping to the feminine, one becomes the stream of the world.”

Nie Que asked Bei Yi about the Dao. (Both Nie Que and Bei Yi were hermits of Yao’s time.) Bei Yi said: “Straighten your body, unify your spirit, and watch for heavenly harmony to arrive; withdraw your knowledge, rectify your bearing, and Shen will enter its dwelling, De will attach to you. Be simple and whole like an infant, and the Dao will stay with you. Be blank and unknowing, like a newborn calf that does not seek what it knows.” Before he had finished speaking, Nie Que pressed further. Bei Yi stared at him in silence, then sang and walked away, saying: “His body is like withered bones, his mind like dead ashes; truly clear yet not relying on old knowledge to support himself; silent and vast, with no mind to scheme with—what sort of person is this!” Therefore Laozi says: “Clear and penetrating in all directions, can one be without knowledge?”

Zhao Xiangzi attacked Di and won, seizing the two cities of Youren and Zhongren. (Youren and Zhongren were two towns of Di.) A messenger came to report the victory; Xiangzi was about to eat but wore a worried look. His attendants said: “Taking two cities in one day is a joyful occasion; why is the ruler worried?” Xiangzi said: “However great the rivers, in no more than three days they dry up; (three days and they are exhausted.) Violent winds and storms do not last past midday. (That is, they cannot last the whole day.) Now the Zhao clan has accumulated no De, yet in one morning it gains two cities—ruin may well fall on me.” Confucius heard of it and said: “The Zhao clan will likely flourish. Worry is the cause of flourishing; joy is the cause of ruin. Winning is not difficult; a worthy ruler uses worry to preserve victory, so blessings reach later generations. Qi, Chu, Wu, and Yue all once won victories but in the end perished, because they did not know how to preserve victory. Only a ruler with the Dao can preserve victory. Confucius could lift the bar of a city gate (the shao was a pulling device; ancient gates were hung, and pulling the bar upward from below was extremely difficult), but did not wish to be known for strength; Mozi was skilled in defense and attack and subdued Gongshu Ban, but did not wish to be known for using troops. (Though Mozi was skilled in using troops, he would not boast of understanding them.) One who is good at preserving victory treats strength as weakness. Therefore Laozi says: “The Dao is empty; when used, it is never filled.”

Hui Meng visited King Kang of Song, bowed once, and withdrew. King Kang said: “I have heard that you, sir, possess the Dao. May I ask: when occupying a ruler’s position, one fears losing the state; when cultivating oneself, one fears being defiled; between advancing and withdrawing, I wish to hear a word from you.” Hui Meng said: “You alone know these three worries, but do not know to ask one who possesses the Dao. To attack states without taking territory, to be greedy and cruel without satisfaction, to impose heavy punishments and harsh executions, so that superior and inferior are estranged, the people’s strength is exhausted in the ditches and valleys, weapons are worn out in the central plains, the world is resentful and angry, and the common people rebel and scatter—this is the ruler destroying himself; it is not that another can destroy him.” King Kang of Song said: “I truly regard the world as not worth contending with.” Hui Meng said: “My substance is foolish; I cannot understand you. Nevertheless, I wish to offer a little. One who can exhaust the world—his ruler cannot be overcome; one who can overcome others—his troops cannot be weakened. Now your troops cannot weaken others, and so Chu and Wei can weaken them; you cannot overcome others, and so Qi and Qin can overcome you. I wish you to abandon this and think of not contending with the world in ability.” King Kang said: “Good; I respectfully receive your command.”

王蹀足謦欬疾言曰寡人所說者勇有功也 不說爲仁義者也客將何以教寡人惠孟對 曰臣有道於此人雖勇刺之不入雖巧有力 擊之不中大王獨無意邪宋王曰善此寡人 之所欲聞也惠孟曰夫刺之而不入擊之而 不中此猶辱也臣有道於此使人雖有勇弗 敢刺雖有力不敢擊夫不敢刺不敢擊非無 其意也臣有道於此使人本無其意也夫無 其意未有愛利之心也臣有道於此使天下 丈夫女子莫不歡然皆欲愛利之心此其賢 於勇有力也四累之上也(此上九四事皆累/於世而男六莫不) (歡然爲/上也)大王獨無意邪宋王曰此寡人所欲 得也惠孟對曰孔墨是已孔丘墨翟無地而 爲君無官而爲長(無地爲君以道冨也/無官爲長以德尊也)天下 丈夫女子莫不延頸舉踵而願安利之者今 大王萬乘之主也誠有其忘則四境之内皆 得其利矣此賢於孔墨也遠矣宋王無以應 惠孟出宋王謂左右曰辯矣客之以說勝寡 人也故老子曰勇於不敢則活由此觀之大 勇反爲不勇耳昔堯之佐九人(謂禹辠陶稷/契伯夷倕益) (夔龍/也)舜之佐七人(皆與堯同臣/其七人也)武王之佐五 人(謂周公召公太/公畢公毛公也)堯舜武王於九七五者不 能一事焉然而垂拱受成功焉善乘人之資
Interpretation

The Great Dao fundamentally abides in harmonious balance. If one wishes to make it manifest from the Dao’s outermost tip, this is in fact already to lower it. Thus, in a hidden and obscure manner, the work of salvation has already been brought to completion. What is called truly great benefit is that the body remain pure and sincere; the essential point lies in the Dao’s essential purport, which may roughly be called supreme plainness. One who is plain has long been revered: spirit and selflessness become one, hiding the sun and moon within defilement while guarding only the Shen mechanism.

也故人與驥逐走則不勝驥託於車上則驥 不能勝人北方有獸其名曰蹷鼠前而菟後 (鼠前足短菟後/足長故謂之蹷)趨則頓走則顛常爲蛩蛩駏 驉取甘草以與之(蛩蛩駏驉前足長後足短/故能乘虛而走不能上也) 蹷有患害蛩蛩駏驉必負而走此以其能託 其所不能故老子曰夫代大匠斲者希不傷 其手薄疑說衛嗣君以王術(嗣君衛/國君也)嗣君應 之曰予所有者千乘也願以愛教薄疑對曰 烏獲舉千鈞又況一斤乎杜赫以安天下說 周昭文君(昭文君周襄衰分爲/西東各自立其君也)文君謂杜赫 曰願學所以安周赫對曰臣之所言不可則 不能安周臣之所言可則周自安矣此所謂 弗安而安者也故老子曰大制無割故致數 輿無輿也魯國之法魯人爲人妾於諸候有 能贖之者取金於府子贛贖魯人於諸候來 而辭不受金孔子曰賜失之矣夫聖人之舉 事也可以移風易俗而受教順可施後世非 獨以適身之行也今國之富者寡而貧者衆 贖而受金則爲不廉不受金則不復贖人自 今以來魯人不復贖人於諸候矣孔子亦可 謂知禮矣故老子曰見小曰明魏武侯問於 李克(李克武/候之相)曰吴之所以亡者何也李克對 曰數戰而數勝武侯曰數戰數勝國之福其 獨以亡何故也對曰數戰則民罷數勝則主
Interpretation

A Vernacular Interpretation of the Huainan Honglie Jie

Thus, if a person races a thousand-li horse on foot, the person cannot outrun the horse; but if the person sits in a carriage, no matter how fast the horse runs, it cannot beat the person—the key lies in whether one knows how to rely on external things.

In the north there is a beast called the Jueshu (with short front legs like a rabbit and long hind legs). As soon as it runs it stumbles, and it cannot walk steadily. It often keeps company with another beast called the Qiongqiong Juxu (which has long front legs and short hind legs; it can run through the air but cannot climb to high places). The Jueshu finds licorice for it, and the Qiongqiong Juxu carries the Jueshu on its back when fleeing danger. Each makes up for the other’s weakness and relies on the other to accomplish what it cannot do itself.

Therefore Laozi said: “He who chops in place of the great carpenter seldom fails to hurt his own hand.” Do not take over for an expert the work in which he specializes; most likely you will injure yourself.

Bo Yi used the art of governing to persuade Lord Sijun of Wei (the ruler of Wei). Lord Sijun said: “I have a thousand war chariots; are you using such shallow views to instruct me?” Bo Yi replied: “Wu Huo could lift a thousand jun; what difficulty would lifting one jin be?”—If one can handle great matters, small matters naturally present no problem.

Du He explained to Lord Zhaowen of Zhou (a ruler of one faction after the Zhou royal house had split) how to stabilize the Zhou house. Lord Zhaowen said he wanted to learn. Du He replied: “If my words are not right, Zhou cannot be stabilized; if they are right, Zhou will stabilize itself.” This is called not deliberately seeking stability and yet naturally being stable. Laozi’s saying “The great regulation does not cut” and “when carriages are many, it is as if there were no carriages” also mean this: the greatest tailoring seems uncut; when there are many carriages, it is as if there were no carriages—not clinging to form.

Lu had a rule: if a citizen of Lu was enslaved in one of the feudal states, whoever ransomed him would be reimbursed by the government. Zigong ransomed people but refused the money. Confucius said: “Ci (Zigong), you are wrong. When a sage acts, he must be able to shift customs and change habits and set an example for later generations; he cannot merely seek his own moral purity. Now in Lu the rich are few and the poor many; taking money for ransoming people seems greedy, but not taking it will mean no one ransoms anyone in the future—from now on, no one in Lu will ransom slaves again.” Confucius can also be said to understand ritual propriety. Laozi said, “To see the small is called clarity”; only by seeing the subtle is one called clear-sighted.

Marquis Wu of Wei asked his chancellor Li Ke: “Why did the state of Wu perish?” Li Ke said: “It won repeated battles and repeated victories.” Marquis Wu said: “Repeated battles and repeated victories should be a blessing; how could they instead cause the state’s fall?” Li Ke replied: “Too much fighting exhausts the people; too many victories make the ruler arrogant.” Marquis Wu asked again: “Did it perish solely because of this?” Li Ke said: “There is more: exhausting military force and waging war without restraint impoverish the state; an arrogant ruler fond of war causes the worthy to withdraw; when laws and decrees are neglected, treachery and evil arise; when the people are unsettled, the foundations are shaken; when meritorious service goes unrewarded, morale declines—when internal disorder and external troubles come together, how could the state not perish?”

(The above uses historical events to explain: apparent “victory” is not necessarily a blessing; governing a state requires seeing the whole situation and guarding the root, which is in the same vein as Laozi’s “great regulation” and “seeing the small.”)

憍以憍主使罷民而國不亡者天下鮮矣憍 則恣恣則極慮上下俱極吴之亡猶晚矣夫 差之所以自剄於干遂也(越伐具夫差/所自殺也)故老 子曰功成名遂身退天之道也甯越欲干齊 桓公困窮無以自達於是爲商旅將任車(任/載) (也詩曰我/任我輦)以商於齊暮宿於郭門之外桓公 郊迎客夜問門辟任車爝火甚盛(爝炬/火也)從者 甚衆甯越飯牛車下望見桓公而悲擊牛角 而疾商歌桓公聞之撫其僕之手曰異哉歌 者非常人也命後車載之桓公及至從者以 請桓公贛之衣冠而見說以爲天下桓公大 說將任之羣臣爭之曰客衛人也衛之去齊 不遠君不若使人問之而故賢者也用之未 晚桓公曰不然問之患其有小惡也以人之 小惡而忘人之大美此人主之所以失天下 之士也凡聽必有驗一聽而弗復問合其所 以也(合己聽知之/意所以用之)且人固難合也權而用其 長者而已矣當是舉也桓公得之矣故老子 曰天大地大道大王亦大域中有四大而王 處其一焉以言其能包裹之也大王亶父居 邠翟人攻之事之以皮帛珠玉而弗受曰翟 人之所求者地無以財物爲也大王亶父曰 與人之兄居而殺其弟與人之父處而殺其 子弗爲皆勉處矣爲吾臣與翟人奚以異且
Interpretation

When an arrogant man becomes ruler and drives the exhausted people as laborers, it is rare in the world for the state not to perish. Arrogance leads to indulgence; indulgence reaches its extreme. When ruler and minister, high and low, have all reached the extreme, the destruction of Wu came late rather than soon. That Fuchai killed himself at Gansui was precisely for this reason. Therefore Laozi said: “To withdraw oneself after achieving merit and fame—this is the way of Heaven.”

Ning Yue wished to seek an audience with Duke Huan of Qi but was so poor that he could not recommend himself. He therefore became a merchant and drove a freight cart to Qi to trade, lodging outside the city gate at night. Duke Huan was in the suburbs welcoming guests. At night he questioned the gatekeeper; beside the freight cart torches blazed brightly and attendants were numerous. Ning Yue was feeding his ox beneath the cart. Looking up and seeing Duke Huan, he was moved to sorrow, struck the ox’s horn, and sang a merchant’s song. Hearing him, Duke Huan clapped his attendant’s hand and said, “How strange! The singer is no ordinary man!” He ordered the rear carriage to receive him. When Duke Huan arrived, his attendants asked for instructions. Duke Huan bestowed clothes and a cap on Ning Yue and granted him an audience. He discussed the great affairs of the realm with him, and Duke Huan was delighted and wanted to employ him.

The assembled ministers vied in saying: “This man is from Wei, and Wei is not far from Qi. You had better send someone to inquire about him. If he is indeed a worthy man, it will not be too late to employ him.” Duke Huan said: “Not so. Inquiry risks his small faults; to forget a man’s great excellences because of his small faults is the very reason rulers lose worthy men throughout the realm. In all cases, when one hears words there must be verification; to hear once and ask no further is to accord with what one knows oneself. Moreover, people are inherently difficult to match completely; weigh them and use their strengths, and that is enough.” Thus Duke Huan gained him. Therefore Laozi said: “Heaven is great, Earth is great, the Dao is great, and the king is also great. Within the domain there are four great ones, and the king occupies one of them”—this speaks of being able to encompass the myriad things.

Taiwang Danfu lived at Bin. The Di attacked him. He sent them skins, silk, pearls, and jade, but they would not accept them, saying that what the Di sought was land, not wealth. Taiwang Danfu said: “To dwell with another man’s elder brother and kill his younger brother, to dwell with another man’s father and kill his son—I will do neither. Let all strive to live together. What difference would it make whether you are my subjects or the Di’s? Moreover, I have heard that a worthy ruler does not cause the people to abandon their occupations, does not seize the people’s farming seasons; good women remain at home, good men in the fields; he does not privately hoard goods rather than give them to others.” Taiwang Danfu then abandoned Bin and left. The people followed him from the slope below Qi to Liang; again he moved on and halted at the foot of Mount Qi. When Taiwang Danfu departed, old and young among the people supported one another and followed him, and thus Zhou was formed.

吾聞之也不以其所養害其養杖策而去民 相連而從之遂成國於岐山之下(岐山今之/美陽北也) (其下有周地因是/以爲天下號也)大王亶父可謂能保生矣 雖富貴不以養傷身雖貧賤不以利累形今 受其先人之爵禄則必重失之所自來者久 矣而輕失之豈不惑哉故老子曰貴以身爲 天下焉可以託天下愛以身爲天下焉可以 寄天下矣中山公子牟(中山鮮/虞之國)謂詹子曰身 處江海之上心在魏闕之下爲之柰何(江海/之上) (言忠在於己身心/之魏闕也言内守)詹子曰重生重生則輕利 (重生己/之性也)中山公子牟曰雖知之猶不能自勝 則從之從之神無怨乎(言不勝己之情欲則/當縱心意則己神無) (怨/也)不能自勝而强弗從者此之謂重傷之人 無壽類矣故老子曰知和曰常知常曰明益 生曰祥心使氣曰强是故用其光復歸其明 也楚莊王問詹何曰治國柰何對曰何明於 治身而不明於治國楚王曰寡人得立宗廟 社稷願學所以守之詹何對曰臣未嘗聞身 治而國亂者也未嘗聞身亂而國治者也故 本任於身不敢對以末楚王曰善故老子曰 修之身其德乃眞也桓公讀書於堂(桓公/齊君)輪 人斲輪於堂下釋其椎鑿而問桓公曰君之 所讀書者何書也桓公曰聖人之書輪扁曰
Interpretation

I have heard: He did not let what nourishes life instead harm life; staff in hand, he whipped his horse and departed, and the common people followed one after another, so he founded a state below Mount Qi (north of present-day Meiyang in Shaanxi). Below Mount Qi lay the land of Zhou, and hence “Zhou” became the title for the realm. Great King Danfu (Gugong Danfu, ancestor of the Zhou clan) may be said to have been able to preserve life: in wealth and honor he did not injure his body through lavish nourishment; in poverty and lowliness he did not burden his form through greed for gain. Now if one inherits the rank and emoluments of one’s forebears, one ought to know deeply that they were not easily come by; to lose them lightly—is that not beclouded confusion? Therefore Laozi said: Only one who governs the world with the heart that prizes his own body can have the world entrusted to him; only one who governs the world with the heart that loves his own body can have the world reposed in him.

Prince Mou of Zhongshan (Zhongshan was a state of the Xianyu) said to Master Zhan: Though I dwell by the rivers and seas, my heart remains tied to the palaces of Wei—what should I do? Master Zhan said: Value the nourishing of life; if you value it, you will make light of fame and profit. Prince Mou said: Though I know the principle, I still cannot control myself. If I yield to feeling and desire and act accordingly, will my Shen (spirit) and mind not resent it? (The implication is: if feeling cannot prevail and one gives the heart free rein to follow desire, then one’s own Shen will also have no complaint.) Master Zhan said: To be unable to control oneself yet forcibly twist oneself away from following desire—such a person is called “doubly injured” and will hardly attain long life. Therefore Laozi said: Knowing harmony is called constancy; knowing constancy is called clarity; augmenting life is called a portent; the mind commanding Qi (vital energy) is called forcing. Thus one uses its light and returns again to its clarity.

King Zhuang of Chu asked Zhan He: How should one govern the state? Zhan He replied: Why are you clear about ordering the body but not clear about governing the state? The king of Chu said: I have been able to establish the ancestral temples and state altars; I wish to learn the way of guarding them. Zhan He replied: I have not heard of a state in chaos when the body is ordered, nor of a state ordered when the body is in chaos. The root lies in the body; I dare not answer with branch details. The king of Chu praised this. Therefore Laozi said: Cultivate it in the body, and one’s De (Virtue/Power) becomes true.

Duke Huan (ruler of Qi) was reading in the hall, while the wheelwright Bian, a wheel-making craftsman, was hewing a wheel below the hall. Setting down his mallet and chisel, Bian asked Duke Huan: What book is Your Lordship reading? Duke Huan answered: The books of the sages. Bian said: … (The original text continues below with Bian’s argument that what is read cannot be transmitted in words.)

其人在焉(輪扁之名問作/書之人何在也)桓公曰已死矣輪 扁曰是直聖人之糟粕耳(糟酒滓也粕/已漉之精也)桓公 悖然作色而怒曰寡人讀書工人焉得而譏 之哉有說則可無說則死輪扁曰然有說臣 誠以臣之斲輪語之大疾則苦而不入(苦急/意也) 大徐則甘而不固(甘緩/意也)不甘不苦應於手猒 于心而可以至妙者臣不能以教臣之子而 臣之子亦不能得之於臣是以行年六十老 而爲輪今聖人之所言者亦以懷其實窮而 死獨其糟粕在耳故老子曰道可道非常道 名可名非常名昔者司城子罕相宋謂宋君 曰夫國家之危安百姓之治亂在君行賞罰 夫爵賞賜予民之所好也君自行之殺戮刑 罰民之所怨也臣請當之宋君曰善寡人當 其美子受其怨寡人自知不爲諸侯笑矣國 人皆知殺戮之專制在子罕也大臣親之百 姓畏之居不至期年子罕遂却宋君而專其 政故老子曰魚不可脫于淵國之利器不可 以示人王壽負書而行見徐馮於周(王壽古/好書之) (人徐馮周/之隱者也)徐馮曰事者應變而動變生於時 故知時者無常行書者言之所出也言出於 知者知者藏書於是王壽乃焚書而舞之(自/喜) (焚其書故/舞之也)故老子曰多言數窮不如守中令
Interpretation

Vernacular Interpretation

Wheelwright Bian Asks “Where Is the Sage?”

Someone asked: Where is the person who wrote the book now? Duke Huan said: He died long ago. Wheelwright Bian said: What you are reading is merely the dregs left by the sage (wine lees, the residue after filtering, a metaphor for surface words). Duke Huan’s expression changed and he grew angry: I am reading, and you, a craftsman, on what grounds do you mock me? If you have a reason, speak it; if you cannot, you will be put to death.

Wheelwright Bian said: I will use my own work making wheels to explain. If the hole is chiseled too tightly, it is rough and will not go in; if too loosely, it slips and will not hold. Neither too loose nor too tight, when the hand moves smoothly and the mind is satisfied, one can reach the subtle point—this skill I cannot teach my son, and my son cannot learn it from me. I am sixty years old and still making wheels. That bit of true substance in the sage’s mind died with the man; what remains is only dregs. Therefore Laozi said: “The Dao that can be spoken is not the constant Dao; the name that can be named is not the constant name.”


Zihan Monopolizes Punishment and Reward

In former times Sicheng Zihan (the Sicheng officer of Song, named Zihan) served as minister of Song and said to the ruler of Song: The safety of the state and the order or disorder of the people lie in reward and punishment. Ranks and rewards are what the people love; please let the ruler bestow rewards himself. Killing and corporal punishment are what the people resent; please let me, your servant, take responsibility for them. The ruler of Song said: Good. The fair name goes to me, the resentful name goes to you; I need not fear that the feudal lords will laugh at me.

Everyone in the state knew that the power of life and death lay with Zihan. The great ministers drew close to him, and the common people feared him. In less than a year, Zihan deposed the ruler of Song and held state power alone. Therefore Laozi said: “Fish cannot leave the deep pool; the sharp instruments of the state cannot be shown to others.”


Wang Shou Burns His Books

Wang Shou (a man of antiquity who loved to collect books) carried his books on his back as he traveled and met Xu Feng (a recluse of Zhou) in the territory of Zhou. Xu Feng said: Affairs should move according to the times, and change arises from the times; one who knows the times has no fixed method. Books are the vehicle of speech, and speech comes from knowledge; the knowledgeable person stores books in his breast—thereupon Wang Shou burned his books and danced (rejoicing in his own awakening, hence he danced).

Therefore Laozi said: “Much speech leads to exhaustion; it is better to keep to the center.” (Too many words instead bring distress; better to hold fast to the middle way.)


Note: This chapter uses stories such as Wheelwright Bian from the Zhuangzi, Zihan from the historical biographies, and Wang Shou’s meeting with Xu Feng to explain in sequence the meanings in the Daodejing such as “the Dao cannot be spoken,” “sharp instruments are not shown to others,” and “keeping to the center and speaking little.” This belongs to the scriptural-commentary style of the Huainan Honglie; the final word “ling” may be the opening character of the following text, and here, following the common quotation, it ends at “keeping to the center.”

尹子佩請飲莊王(子佩楚莊王之相/請飲請置酒也)莊王許 諾子佩疏揖北面立於殿下(䟽徒跣也/揖舉手也)曰昔 者君王許之今不果往(果誠/也)意者臣有罪乎 莊王曰吾聞子具於强臺强臺者南望料山 以臨方皇(料山名方皇水/名也一曰山名)左江而右淮其樂 忘死若吾薄德之人不可以當此樂也恐留 而不能反故老子曰不見可欲使心不亂晋 公子重耳出亡過曹無禮焉(曹共公聞重耳/駢脇使袒而捕) (魚設薄/以觀之)釐負羇之妻謂釐負羇曰君無禮於 晋公子吾觀其從者皆賢人也(從者狐偃趙/衰之屬也) 若以相夫子反晋國必伐曹子何不先加德 焉釐負羇遺之壺餕而加璧焉重耳受其餕 而反其璧及其反國起師伐曹剋之令三軍 無入釐負羇之里故老子曰曲則全枉則直 越王勾踐與吴戰而不勝國破身亡困於會 稽忿心張膽氣如涌泉選練甲卒赴火若滅 然而請身爲臣妻爲妾親執戈爲吴兵先馬 走(先馬走/先馬前)果擒之於千遂故老子曰柔之勝 剛也弱之勝强也天下莫不知而莫之能行 越王親之故霸中國趙簡子死未葬中牟入 齊(中牟自入/臣於齊也)已葬五日襄子起兵攻圍之未 合而城自壞者十丈襄子擊金而退之(軍法/鼓以)
Interpretation

A Vernacular Explanation of the Huainan Honglie Jie

Yin Zipe invited King Zhuang of Chu to a banquet, and the king agreed.

Zipe, barefoot and with his hands clasped in salute, stood facing north beneath the hall and said, “Earlier Your Majesty agreed to attend the banquet, but now you have not come. Have I committed some fault?”

The king said, “I heard that you had prepared the banquet at Qiang Terrace. Qiang Terrace looks south toward Mount Liao and overlooks the Fanghuang waters, with the Yangtze on the left and the Huai on the right. Pleasures of that kind are enough to make one forget life and death. My virtue is shallow; I could not bear such pleasure, and I feared that once I went I would linger and forget to return. Therefore Laozi said: Do not look at things that can arouse desire, and the heart will not be thrown into disorder.”


Chong’er, prince of Jin, passed through Cao while in exile, and Duke Gong of Cao treated him rudely. Having heard that Chong’er’s ribs were joined as one, he had him bare his body and catch fish, and set out a thin mat to watch. Xi Fuji’s wife said to Xi Fuji, “The ruler has been rude to the prince of Jin. I observe that his followers are all worthy men. If they assist him, once Chong’er returns to his state he will surely attack Cao. Why not show him goodwill first?” Xi Fuji sent him a pot of food, along with a jade disk. Chong’er accepted the food but returned the jade disk.

Later, after returning to his state, he raised troops and attacked Cao. He broke Cao, but ordered the three armies not to enter Xi Fuji’s village. Therefore Laozi said: “To yield is to be preserved whole; to be bent is to become straight.”


King Goujian of Yue fought with Wu and was defeated. His state was broken and his life imperiled; he was trapped at Kuaiji. In his heart was resentment, and his courage surged like a spring. He carefully selected armored soldiers, who went into fire as if returning home. He then asked to become a subject himself and for his wife to become a concubine, and holding a halberd he acted as a vanguard for the Wu army, and in the end captured King Fuchai of Wu. Therefore Laozi said: “The soft overcomes the hard; the weak overcomes the strong. No one under heaven does not know this, yet no one can practice it.” Goujian practiced it in person, and so became hegemon of the Central Plains.


Zhao Jianzi died, and before he was buried, Zhongmou rebelled and went over to Qi. Five days after the burial, Zhao Xiangzi raised troops and besieged Zhongmou. Before the siege could close, a stretch of the city wall ten zhang long collapsed by itself. Xiangzi sounded the metal gong and withdrew the army. (Military law: beat the drum to advance, sound the gong to retreat.)

(進衆鉦/以退之)軍吏諫曰君誅中牟之罪而城自壞 是天助我何故去之襄子曰吾聞之叔向曰 君子不乘人於利不迫人於險使之治城城 治而後攻之中牟聞其義乃請降故老子曰 夫唯不爭故天下莫能與之爭秦繆公請伯 樂曰子之年長矣子姓有可使求馬者乎(子/姓) (謂伯/樂子)對曰良馬者可以形容筋骨相也相天 下之馬者若滅若失若亡(若滅其相不可見/也若失乍入乍出) (也若亡髣/髴不及也)其一若此馬者絶塵弭徹(絶塵不/及也弭) (徹引迹/疾也)臣之子皆下林也可告以良馬而不 可告以天下之馬臣有所與供儋纏采薪者 九方堙(纏索也九方/堙人姓名也)此其於馬非臣之下也 請見之穆公見之使之求馬三月而反報曰 已得馬矣在於沙丘穆公曰何馬也對曰牡 而黄使人往取之牝而驪穆公不說召伯樂 而問之曰敗矣子之所使求者毛物牝牡弗 能知又何馬之能知伯樂喟然大息曰一至 此乎是乃其所以千萬臣而無數者也若堙 之所觀者天機也得其精而忘其粗在内而 忘其外見其所見而不見其所不見視其所 視而遺其所不視若彼之所相者乃有貴乎 馬者馬至而果千里之馬故老子曰大直若 屈大巧若拙吴起爲楚令尹適魏問屈宜若
Interpretation

A Vernacular Interpretation of Relevant Passages from the Huainan Honglie Jie

(In the army) “Strike the zheng (a metal percussion instrument used in ancient marches for advancing and retreating) to withdraw the troops.” The military officer remonstrated: “The ruler has just launched a punitive expedition against Zhongmou (a place name) for its offense, and the city wall has collapsed by itself. This is Heaven helping us. Why withdraw?” Xiangzi (Zhao Xiangzi, leader of the Zhao clan in Jin) said: “I have heard the words of Shuxiang (a worthy minister of Jin): a gentleman does not take advantage of another’s misfortune, nor does he press someone when that person is in danger. Let them repair the city first, and then attack.” When Zhongmou heard of this principle, it voluntarily asked to surrender. Therefore Laozi said: precisely because he does not contend, no one in the world can contend with him.

Duke Mu of Qin (ruler of Qin) asked Bo Le (a famous master of horse physiognomy): “You are advanced in years. Is there anyone in your household whom you can send out to seek horses?” Bo Le replied: “For judging ‘good horses,’ one looks at outward form and bone structure; for judging ‘horses of the world’ (the supreme, elusive steeds), they seem as if about to be extinguished, as if about to be lost, as if about to vanish—(Ruomie: their appearance is almost invisible; Rush: they advance and withdraw unpredictably; Ruwang: indistinct, impossible to catch up.) If among them there is such a horse, it can ‘cut off the dust’ (run so fast that the dust cannot catch it) and ‘stop the ruts’ (halt the tracks, running extremely fast). My sons are only good enough for the ‘xialin’ level (ordinary parks, ordinary good horses); they can be entrusted with finding good horses, but not with finding horses of the world. I have a man who together with me carried ropes and gathered firewood, named Jiufang Yin (‘chan’ refers to rope and harness; Jiufang Yin is a person’s name). His horse judging is not inferior to that of my sons. I beg permission to introduce him.”

Duke Mu received him and sent him to seek the horse. After three months he returned and reported: “It has been found, at Shaqiu.” Duke Mu asked what kind of horse it was. He answered: “A male, yellow.” When men were sent to lead it back, it was female and black (deep black). Duke Mu was displeased and summoned Bo Le: “This is bad. The man you sent cannot even distinguish coat color or sex; how can he talk of recognizing horses?” Bo Le sighed with deep feeling: “He has actually reached this level! This is precisely why he surpasses me a thousandfold—by countless times. What Jiufang Yin looked at was the heavenly mechanism (innate intuition, spiritual resonance); he grasped the essence and forgot the coarse, attended to the inner and forgot the outer—seeing only what should be seen, not seeing what should not be seen; looking only at what should be looked at, not clinging to what should not be looked at. What he judged was something more valuable than ‘horse.’” When the horse arrived, it was indeed a thousand-li horse. Therefore Laozi said: the straightest seems bent; the most skillful seems clumsy.

Wu Qi (a famous general of the Warring States period) served as Lingyin (chief minister) of Chu. He went to Wei and asked Qu Yiruo…

(屈宜若楚大夫/亡在魏者也)曰王不知起之不肖而以爲 令尹先生試觀起之爲人也屈子曰將柰何 吴起曰將衰楚國之爵而平其制禄損其有 餘而綏其不足砥礪甲兵時爭利於天下屈 子曰宜若聞之昔善治國家者不變其故不 易其常今子將衰楚國之爵而平其制禄損 其有餘而綏其不足是變其故易其常也行 之者不利宜若聞之曰怒者逆德也兵者凶 器也爭者人之所本也今子隂謀逆德好用 凶器始人之所本(本者謂/兵爭也)逆之至也且子用 魯兵不宜得志於齊而得志焉(吴起爲將/伐齊敗之)子 用魏兵不宜得志於秦而得志焉(吴起爲魏/西河守秦) (兵不敢/東下也)宜若聞之非禍人不能成禍吾固惑 吾王之數逆天道戾人理至今無禍差須夫 子也(差須猶/意須也)吴起惕然曰尚可更乎屈子曰 成形之徒不可更也(成刑之徒刑/禍已成於衆)子不若敦 愛而篤行之老子曰挫其銳解其紛和其光 同其塵晋伐楚三舍不止大夫請擊之莊王 曰先君之時晋不伐楚及孤之身而晋伐楚 是孤之過也若何其辱群大夫曰先臣之時 晋不伐楚今臣之身而晋伐楚此臣之罪也 請三擊之王俛而泣涕沾襟起而拜君大夫 晋人聞之曰君臣爭以過爲在己且輕下其 臣不可伐也夜還師而歸老子曰能受國之
Interpretation

(Qu Yi was originally a high officer of Chu and later went into exile in Wei.) He said to the King of Chu: “Your Majesty does not know that Wu Qi’s conduct is poor, yet you have made him Lingyin (chief minister). You might as well see for yourself what sort of man Wu Qi is.”

Qu Yi asked: “What do you plan to do?”

Wu Qi said: “I plan to cut back Chu’s excessively high ranks, unify the salary system, reduce surplus and supplement insufficiency, reorganize the armed forces, and contend for advantage throughout the world.”

Qu Yi said: “I have heard that those skilled in governing do not alter old institutions or lightly change constant laws. Now you want to cut ranks, equalize salaries, reduce surplus, and relieve insufficiency—this is changing the old and altering the constant, and no one who does so comes to a good end. I have also heard: anger violates virtue; weapons are inauspicious instruments; war is what people should guard against. Now you secretly plot matters contrary to virtue, are fond of using inauspicious weapons, and stir up what people should fundamentally avoid (the word ‘ben’ here refers to armed conflict)—this is great rebellion. Moreover, when you used Lu’s army, you were not supposed to succeed against Qi, yet you did (Wu Qi commanded troops against Qi and badly defeated its army); when you used Wei’s army, you were not supposed to succeed against Qin, yet you did (Wu Qi served as defender of Wei’s West River, and the Qin army did not dare come east). I have heard: one who is not a bringer of disaster cannot bring disaster about. I have long wondered why our ruler has repeatedly gone against the Way of Heaven and violated human principles, yet to this day has met no disaster; perhaps he has been waiting for you (the term ‘chaxu’ means ‘to wait for’).”

Wu Qi, visibly uneasy, said: “Can it still be changed?”

Qu Yi said: “When guilt is already formed and the shape already fixed, it cannot be changed again (the phrase ‘those who have completed the punishment’ means that disaster has already been brewed among the people). You had better be sincere and self-respecting and act in a solid, practical way.”

Laozi said: “Blunt the sharpness, untangle the knots, harmonize the light, and merge with the dust.”

Jin attacked Chu and, after advancing three marches, still did not stop. The high officers of Chu asked to go out and fight. King Zhuang said: “When the former ruler was alive, Jin did not attack Chu; now that I am in charge, Jin comes to attack—this is my fault. How can I let the assembled ministers be humiliated again?” The high officers said: “When the former ministers were alive, Jin did not attack Chu; in our generation Jin comes to attack—this is our crime. Please let us make three sorties.” The king bowed his head and wept, soaking his lapels, then rose and bowed to the high officers.

When the people of Jin heard this, they said: “Ruler and ministers all compete to take the fault upon themselves, and the ruler moreover humbles himself before his ministers; such a state cannot be attacked.” Thereupon they withdrew their army and returned home overnight.

Laozi said: “To be able to bear the dirt of the state—that is, to bear the state’s humiliation and faults—is to be the lord of the altars of soil and grain.”

垢是謂社稷主宋景公之時熒惑在心公懼 召子韋而問焉(子韋司/星者也)曰熒惑在心何也子 韋曰熒惑天罰也心宋分野(宋之分野上/屬房心之星)禍 且當君雖然可移於宰相公曰宰相所使治 國家也而移死焉不祥子韋曰可移於民公 曰歲民之命歲饑民必死矣爲人君而欲殺 其民以自活也其誰以我爲君者乎是寡人 之命固已盡矣子韋無復言矣子韋還走北 面再拜曰敢賀君天之處高而聽卑君有君 人之言三天必有三賞君今夕星必徙三舍 君延年二十一歲公曰子奚以知之對曰君 有君人之言三故有三賞星必三徙舍舍行 七里三七二十一故君移年二十一歲臣請 伏於陛下以司之星不徙臣請死之公曰可 是夕也星果三徙舍故老子曰能受國之不 祥是謂天下王昔者公孫龍在趙之時謂弟 子曰人而無能者龍不能與遊有客衣褐帶 索而見曰臣能呼公孫龍顧謂弟子曰門下 故有能呼者乎對曰無有公孫龍曰與之弟 子之籍後數日往說燕王至於河上而航在 一汜(汜水/涯也)使善呼之一呼而航來故曰聖人 之處世不逆有伎能之士故老子曰人無棄 人物無棄物是謂襲明子發攻蔡踰之(子發/楚宣) (王之將軍踰/越勝之也)宣王郊迎列田百頃而封之執
Interpretation

Only one who can bear the calamities of a state without shifting them onto others deserves to be called lord of the altars of soil and grain (sheji).

During the reign of Duke Jing of Song, the Yinghuo star (what the ancients called Mars) entered the “Heart” lunar mansion. Duke Jing was frightened and summoned Zi Wei, asking, “Yinghuo is in the Heart mansion—what does this mean?” (Zi Wei was an official in charge of observing the stars and divination.) Zi Wei said, “Yinghuo is a sign of heavenly punishment; the Heart mansion corresponds to Song’s field-allocation (fenye) (in astrological field-allocation, Song belonged to the Fang and Xin mansions). The calamity was originally to fall on the ruler, but it can be transferred to the prime minister.” Duke Jing said, “The prime minister governs the state on my behalf; to push a fatal calamity onto him is inauspicious.” Zi Wei said, “It can be transferred to the people.” Duke Jing said, “The people depend on the harvest for their food; if the harvest is poor, they will starve to death. As the ruler, if I wished to kill the people in exchange for my own survival, who would still acknowledge me as lord? My fate is probably already settled.” Zi Wei said no more.

Zi Wei turned and ran back; bowing twice toward the north, he said, “I venture to congratulate Your Majesty: Heaven dwells on high yet hears and examines the affairs below. Just now Your Majesty spoke three sentences that possess a ruler’s virtue; Heaven must bestow a threefold reward. Tonight the star must shift by three lodges (she), and Your Majesty may extend your lifespan by twenty-one years.” Duke Jing asked, “How do you know?” Zi Wei replied, “Your Majesty has spoken three humane ruler’s words, hence there are three rewards; the star must shift three lodges, one lodge corresponding to a journey of seven li; three times seven is twenty-one, hence twenty-one years are added to your lifespan. I wish to prostrate myself beneath the palace hall and wait to observe the stars; if the star does not move, I ask to be put to death.” Duke Jing said, “Good.”

That night, the star indeed shifted by three lodges. Therefore Laozi said: Only one who can bear the state’s inauspiciousness is worthy to be called king of the world.

Formerly, when Gongsun Long was in the state of Zhao, he said to his disciples, “I do not associate with people who have no ability.” A visitor wearing coarse cloth and tied with a grass rope came to see him and said, “I can call out.” Gongsun Long turned and asked his disciples, “Have any of my followers ever been able to call out?” They answered, “No.” Gongsun Long said, “Bring him in.” Several days later, this man went to persuade the King of Yan. When he reached the river, he had to wait for a ferry; the boat was on the far side of a river branch (si: water’s edge, bank). He had the skilled caller give a shout, and the boat came over. Thus it is said that when the sage deals with the world, he does not reject people with skills. Laozi said: People are not abandoned if they have usable talent, and things are not discarded if they are usable; this is called inheriting clarity (ximing).

Zi Fa (a Chu general, a commander under King Xuan of Chu) attacked Cai; the Yue people assisted in battle and won. King Xuan went to the outskirts to welcome him, granting him a hundred qing of land and bestowing honors. “Holding the gui” (a ritual object; here it refers to the rite of enfeoffment)—this passage is connected with “Zi Fa attacked Cai” and discusses being rewarded for merit. Laozi further emphasizes: making good use of talent, not abandoning people, and not discarding things—this is the Dao of “inheriting clarity” (ximing).

圭(楚爵功臣賜以圭謂/之執圭比附庸之君也)子發辭不受曰治 國立政諸候入賔此君之德也發號施令師 未合而敵循此將軍之威也兵陳戰而勝敵 者此庶民之力也夫乘民之功榮而取其爵 禄者仁義之道也故辭而弗受故老子曰功 成而不居夫唯不居是以不去晋文公伐原 (原周邑周襄王以原/賜文公原叛伐也)與大夫期三日三日而 原不降文公令去之軍吏曰原不過一二日 將降矣君曰吾不知原三日而不可得下也 以與大夫期盡而不罷失信得原吾弗爲也 原人聞之曰有君若此可弗降也遂降温人 聞亦請降(時周人亦以温予/文公温相連皆叛)故老子曰窈兮 㝠兮其中有精其精甚眞其中有信故美言 可以市尊美行可以加人公儀休相魯(公儀/休故) (魯博/士也)而嗜魚一國獻魚公儀子不受其弟子 諫曰夫子嗜魚弗受何也答曰夫唯嗜魚故 弗受夫受魚而免於相雖嗜魚不能自給魚 毋受魚而不免於相則能長自給魚此眀於 爲人爲己者也故老子曰後具身而身先外 其身而身存非以其無私邪故能成其私一 曰知足不辱狐丘丈人謂孫叔敖(丈人老而/杖於人者) 曰人有三怨子知之乎孫叔敖曰何謂也對 曰爵高者士妬之官大者主惡之禄厚者怨 處之孫叔敖曰吾爵益高吾志益下吾官益
Interpretation

Vernacular Interpretation of the Huainan Honglie Jie

On the “Gui” and Declining a Title

The “gui” was a ritual vessel bestowed by Chu upon meritorious officials; its recipients were called “holders of the gui,” and their status was equivalent to that of the ruler of a dependent state. Zifa declined it and would not accept, saying: In governing the state and establishing its policies, so that the feudal lords come to offer congratulations—this is the virtue of the ruler. In issuing orders, so that before the army has assembled the enemy has already withdrawn—this is the awe-inspiring authority of the general. In drawing up battle formations and fighting to defeat the enemy—this is the strength of the people. To establish merit by relying on the strength of the people and yet monopolize rank and stipend for oneself does not accord with the way of benevolence and righteousness. Therefore he declined and would not accept it.

Thus Laozi says: “Achieve success but do not dwell in it; only because one does not dwell in it, it does not leave.” (To accomplish merit without claiming it; precisely because one does not claim it, the merit does not depart.)

Duke Wen of Jin Attacks Yuan

Duke Wen of Jin attacked the state of Yuan (Yuan was a city of Zhou; King Xiang of Zhou had once granted this place to Duke Wen, and later Yuan rebelled, so Duke Wen sent troops to punish it). He agreed with his senior officials on a three-day limit. After three days Yuan did not surrender, and Duke Wen ordered the army to withdraw. A military officer said: “Yuan will surrender in no more than a day or two.” Duke Wen said: “I do not know about Yuan’s affairs, but since I agreed with the senior officials on three days, if it does not surrender by the deadline I must withdraw. I will not break faith in order to obtain Yuan.” The people of Yuan, hearing this, said: “With a ruler like this, how could we not surrender?” Thereupon they surrendered. The people of Wen, hearing this, also asked to surrender (at that time the Zhou had also granted the land of Wen to Duke Wen; Wen bordered Yuan, and both had rebelled).

Thus Laozi says: “Profound and obscure, within it there is Jing (essence); this essence is utterly real, within it there is trustworthiness.” (Deep and dark, yet within it there is essence; that essence is very real, and within it is contained trustworthiness.)

Gongyi Xiu as Minister of Lu

Gongyi Xiu served as prime minister of Lu (he was an erudite of Lu). He liked to eat fish, and people throughout the state offered fish to him, but he never accepted them. His disciples admonished him, saying: “You like to eat fish; why do you not accept them?” He replied: “It is precisely because I like to eat fish that I do not accept them. If I accepted fish and thereby were removed from the office of prime minister, then even if I liked to eat fish, I could no longer supply fish for myself; if I do not accept fish and am not removed from the office of prime minister, then I can long supply fish for myself. This is to understand the principle that acting for others is acting for oneself.”

Thus Laozi says: “Putting himself behind, he is in front; setting himself outside, he is preserved. Is it not because he is selfless? Thus he can accomplish his private ends.” (Placing oneself behind, one instead leads; setting oneself aside, one is preserved. Is it not precisely because he is selfless? Therefore he can accomplish his private ends.)

Huqiu Zhangren and Sunshu Ao

Huqiu Zhangren said to Sunshu Ao (Zhangren means an old man who walks with a staff): “People have three things that invite resentment; do you know them?” Sunshu Ao asked: “What are they?” He answered: “Those of high rank are envied by the scholar-officials; those of great office are disliked by the ruler; those with generous stipends are resented by the multitude.” Sunshu Ao said: “The higher my rank, the humbler my resolve; the greater my office…”

大吾心益小吾禄益厚吾施益博是以免三 怨可乎故老子曰貴必以賤爲本高必以下 爲基大司馬捶(視果/反)鈎者年八十矣(捶鍛擊/也鈎釣) (鈎/也)而不失鈎芒大司馬曰子巧邪有道邪曰 臣有守也臣年二十好捶鈎於物無視也非 鈎無察也是以用之者必假於弗用也而以 長得其用而況持不用者乎物孰不濟焉故 老子曰從事於道者同於道文王砥德修政 三年而天下二垂歸之(砥礪也文王三/分天下有其二)紂聞 而患之曰余夙興夜寐與之競行則苦心勞 形縱而置之恐伐余一人崇侯虎曰周伯昌 行仁義而善謀太子發勇敢而不疑中子旦 恭儉而知時若與之從則不堪其殃縱而赦 之身必危亡冠雖弊必加於頭及未成請圖 之屈商乃拘文王於羑里(屈商紂臣也羑里/地名也在河内湯) 隂於是散宜生乃以千金求天下之珍怪得 騶虞雞斯之乘(騶虞白虎黑文而仁食自死/之獸日行千里雞斯神馬也) 玄玉百工(二玉爲/一工也)大貝百朋(五貝爲/一朋也)玄豹黄 羆青犴(音岸杆胡/地野犬也)白虎文皮千合以獻於紂 因費仲而通(費仲紂/佞臣也)紂見而說之乃免其身 殺牛而賜之文王歸乃爲玉門築靈臺相女 童擊鐘鼓(玉門以玉飾門爲柱樞也相/女童相視之一曰相匠也)以待
Interpretation

Small guidance brings great benefit; small words are deep and broad; this is what the true Dao requires. Laozi says: “The noble must take the humble as its root; the high must take the low as its foundation.” Thus the Grand Marshal’s hook-hammerer, though eighty years old and paying no attention to anything but the hook, did not rely on useless things, and so his use of his craft endured. King Wen sharpened his virtue and cultivated government for three years, and the two extremities of the world turned to him. King Zhou was troubled by this and had Qu Shang imprison King Wen at Youli. San Yisheng spent a thousand pieces of gold to seek rare marvels and obtained a zouyu, Jisi horses, dark jade, great cowries, black leopards, yellow bears, blue wild dogs, and white tiger skins, which he presented to Zhou. Fei Zhong served as intermediary; Zhou was pleased, pardoned King Wen, and gave him oxen. After King Wen returned, he built the Jade Gate and the Spirit Terrace, and young girls beat bells and drums in welcome.

紂之失也紂聞之曰周伯昌改道易行吾無 憂矣乃爲炮烙剖比干剔孕婦殺諫者文王 乃遂其謀故老子曰知其榮守其辱爲天下 谷成王問政於尹佚曰吾何德之行(尹佚/史佚)而 民親其上對曰使之時而敬順之王曰其度 安至曰如臨深淵如履薄冰王曰懼哉王人 乎尹佚曰天地之間四海之内善之則吾畜 也不善則吾讎也昔夏商之臣反讎桀紂而 臣湯武宿沙之民皆自攻其君而歸神農(伏/羲) (神農之間有共工/宿沙霸天下者也)此世之所明知也如何其 無懼也故老子曰人之所畏不可不畏也跖 之徒問跖曰盜亦有道乎跖曰奚適其無道 也夫意而中藏者聖也入先者勇也出後者 義也分均者仁也知可否者智也五者不備 而能成大盜者天下無之由此觀之盜賊之 心必託聖人之道而後可行故老子曰絶聖 棄智民利百倍楚將子發好求技道之士楚 有善爲偷者往見曰聞君求技道之士臣偷 也願以技齎一卒(齎備/卒足)子發聞之衣不給帶 冠不暇正出見而禮之左右諫曰偷者天下 之盜也何爲之禮君曰此非左右之所得與 後無幾何齊興兵伐楚子發將師以當之兵 三却楚賢良大夫皆盡其計而悉其誠齊師 愈强於是市偷進請曰臣有薄技願爲君行 之子發曰諾不問其辭而遺之偷則夜解齊
Interpretation

Relevant Passages from the Huainanzi (Huainan Honglie) · A Plain-Language Reading


I. King Zhou's Loss of the World and King Wen's Stratagem

There is a background story to King Zhou's downfall. When King Zhou heard that the Earl of Zhou, Chang (that is, King Wen of Zhou), had already "changed his ways and altered his conduct" and drawn in his sharp edges, he said with satisfaction, "There is nothing left for me to worry about." From then on he grew even more unbridled: he devised the roasting-pillar punishment (paoluo), had Bi Gan's heart cut out, had pregnant women ripped open, and killed ministers who remonstrated. King Wen, seeing that the hearts of the people had turned away and that the feudal lords looked on askance, was instead able to calmly complete the great plan of overthrowing Zhou. This is why Laozi said: "Know honor, keep to disgrace, and become the valley of the world." Understanding glory without displaying it, being willing to occupy the lowly and humiliated position—only thus can one hold all things as a valley does, and become the "valley" to which the world returns. King Wen was outwardly compliant while in truth gathering strength; his meaning connects with this.


II. King Cheng Asks Yin Yi About Governance

King Cheng of Zhou asked Yin Yi (Shi Yi) about the way of governing: "What sort of De (Virtue/Power) should I practice so that the common people will feel close to and submit to those who rule over them?"

Yin Yi answered: "In employing the people, one must suit the season; treat them with respect and guide them gently."

King Cheng asked: "To what degree should this 'measure' extend?"

Yin Yi said: "As if gazing into a deep abyss, as if treading on thin ice."

King Cheng said: "That is truly awe-inspiring!"

Yin Yi said: "My king, it is human beings you are governing! Between heaven and earth, within the four seas, if the people are treated well by you, they will be to you as though you were nurturing them; if you treat them badly, they will become your enemies. The subjects of Xia and Shang turned against Jie and Zhou and instead supported Tang and Wu; the people of the Susha region also once attacked their ruler and attached themselves to the lineage of Shennong (Fuxi)—legend holds that between Shennong and Fuxi there were still figures such as Gonggong and Susha who dominated the world. These are all matters known to everyone in the world—how could my king fail to hold fear in his heart?" This is why Laozi also said: "What people fear cannot but be feared." What the multitude fears—the way of Heaven, the hearts of the people, cause and effect—a ruler cannot fail to hold in awe.


III. Robber Zhi on "There Being a Way Even Among Thieves"

Robber Zhi's followers asked him: "Is there a 'way' (Dao) even in being a thief?"

Robber Zhi said: "How could one say there is no way? To guess where another has hidden his valuables and get them—that is 'sagehood'; to be the first to break in—that is 'courage'; to be the last to withdraw—that is 'rightness'; to divide the loot fairly—that is 'benevolence'; to judge whether the venture can succeed—that is 'wisdom.' There is no one in the world who lacks these five things and still wishes to become a great thief. From this we see that even in the hearts of thieves there must be reliance on those 'ways' spoken of by the sages before anything can be accomplished." This is why Laozi said, "Cut off sagehood and discard wisdom"—if understood from the reverse side: once the names of "sagehood" and "wisdom" are abused, even thieves will use the way of the sages as a cover. Laozi advocated weakening that worship of "sagehood and wisdom" which had been stolen and misused, so that the people might instead gain real benefit in abundance ("the people's benefit will be a hundredfold").


IV. Zifa's Courtesy to a Thief and the Repulse of the Qi Army

The Chu general Zifa was fond of gathering men of uncommon skill. There was a thief in Chu skilled at stealing who came to seek him out, saying: "I have heard that you seek men who possess extraordinary arts. I make my living by stealing, and I wish to offer my modest skill, asking only for the treatment of a single common soldier." When Zifa heard this, he did not wait to fasten his sash or set his cap straight, but went out to meet him and received him with courtesy. His attendants remonstrated: "A thief is the scum of the world—why receive him with courtesy?" Zifa said: "This is not something you attendants may decide on your own."

Before long, Qi raised troops to attack Chu. Zifa led the army to meet the enemy but was driven back three times in succession. The worthy men and great officers of Chu exhausted their stratagems and their loyalty, yet the Qi army only grew stronger with each battle. At this point the petty thief from the marketplace stepped forward and said: "I have a small skill and wish to serve my lord." Zifa said: "Good." Without asking for details, he sent him off.

That night the thief slipped into the Qi camp and removed the Qi general's bedding, headcloth, and the like (or unfastened his tent curtains and hairpin cords, throwing the army into confusion). When the Qi general discovered this he was greatly alarmed, believing that either divine aid or internal treachery was at work, and the morale of the army collapsed. When battle was joined the next day, the Chu army was greatly heartened and the Qi army was crushingly defeated.

Afterward Zifa said: "I did not measure men by the rank of their office, nor did I ask about their origins—I looked only at whether they could get the job done, and so I was able to repel the enemy. Had I despised him that day because he was a 'thief,' Chu would long since have perished."


Summary of Key Points

PassageCore Meaning
King Zhou and King WenThe more tyrannical the tyrant, the more the worthy is able to ride the momentum and rise; knowing honor while keeping to disgrace is the only way to become the valley of the world.
Yin YiGoverning the people is like facing a deep abyss and treading on thin ice; the people may be made kin or made enemies, and the lessons of history cannot but be feared.
Robber ZhiEven thieves apply "sagehood, courage, rightness, benevolence, and wisdom"; hence Laozi's "cut off sagehood and discard wisdom," to prevent the teaching of names from being exploited by the wicked.
Zifa and the thiefDo not judge people by noble or base station; even an unusual skill can save a state; as with "the Dao is in the tiles and bricks," what matters is practical use and sincerity of heart.

The above follows the common narrative sequence of the Huainanzi and its quotations from Laozi; proper names such as paoluo (the roasting pillar), Bi Gan, Yin Yi, Robber Zhi, and Zifa are explained briefly according to historical biography and the context of the various philosophers, so as to make it easier to read through to the original meaning.

將軍之幬帳而獻之子發因使人歸之曰卒 有出薪者得將軍之帷使歸之於執事明又 復往取其枕子發又使人歸之明日又復往 取其簪子發又使歸之齊師聞之大駭將軍 與軍吏謀曰今日不去楚君恐取吾頭則還 師而去故曰無細而能薄在人君用之耳故 老子曰不善人善人之資也顔回謂仲尼曰 回益矣仲尼曰何謂也曰回忘禮樂矣(回忘/禮樂) (絶聖弃知入/於無爲也)仲尼曰可矣猶未也異日復見 曰回益矣仲尼曰何謂也曰回忘仁義矣仲 尼曰可矣猶未也異日復見曰回坐忘矣(言/坐) (自忘其身/以至道也)仲尼造然曰何謂坐忘顔回曰隳 支體黜聦明離形去知洞於化通是謂坐忘 仲尼曰洞則無善也化則無常矣而夫子薦 賢(薦先也/回入賢)丘請從之後故老子曰載營魄抱 一能無離乎專氣至柔能如嬰兒乎秦穆公 興師將以襲鄭蹇叔曰不可臣聞襲國者以 車不過百里以人不過三十里爲其謀未及 發泄也甲兵未及銳弊也糧食未及乏絶也 人民未及罷病也皆以其氣之高與其力之 盛至是以犯敵能威今行數千里又數絶諸 侯之地以襲國臣不知其可也君重圖之穆 公不聽蹇叔送師衰絰而哭之師遂行過周 而東鄭賈人弦高矯鄭伯之命以十二牛勞 秦師而賔之三帥乃懼而謀曰吾行數千里 以襲人未至而人已知之其備必先成不可 襲也還師而去當此之時晋文公適薨未葬 先軫言於襄公(先軫晋大夫也/襄公晋文公子)曰昔吾先君 與穆公交天下莫不聞諸候莫不知今吾君 薨未葬而不弔吾喪而不假道是死吾君而 弱吾孤也請擊之襄公許諾先軫舉兵而與 秦師遇於□大破之擒其三軍以歸穆公聞 之素服廟臨以說於衆(說/解)故老子曰知而不 知尚矣不知而知病也齊王后死王欲置后 而未定使群臣議薛公欲中王之意(薛公田/嬰也) 因獻十珥而美其一旦日因問美珥之所在 因勸立以爲王后齊王大說遂尊重薛公故 人主之意欲見於外則爲人臣之所制故老 子曰塞其兊閉其門終身不勤盧敖游乎北 海盧(敖燕人秦始皇召以爲博/士使求神仙亡而不反也)經乎太隂入 乎玄闕(太隂北方也玄/闕北方之山也)至於蒙穀之上(蒙穀/山名) 見一士焉深目而玄鬢淚注(涙/水)而鳶肩豐上 而殺下軒軒然方迎風而舞顧見盧敖慢然 下其臂(慢然止/舞也)遯逃乎碑(匿於/碑隂)盧敖就而視 之方倦龜殻(楚人謂倨爲倦/龜殻龜甲也)而食蛤梨(蛤梨/海蚌) 盧敖與之語曰唯敖爲背群離黨窮觀於六 合之外者非敖而已乎敖幼而好游至長不
Interpretation

A Vernacular Interpretation of the Huainan Honglie Jie

I. Xian Zhen Defeats the Qin Army

To launch a surprise attack on another while that other has already perceived it; one’s own defenses must first be prepared, and one must not act rashly.

The Qin army was withdrawing back to Qin. At just this time, Duke Wen of Jin had recently died and had not yet been buried. Xian Zhen, a Jin minister, said to Duke Xiang, son of Duke Wen: “Formerly our late ruler and Duke Mu of Qin divided the rule of the world, and all the feudal lords knew of it. Now our ruler has died unburied, and Qin does not come to mourn, nor does it ask us for passage to return home. This is to insult our ruler in his recent death and to bully our orphaned ruler and widow. I ask permission to send troops and strike them.” Duke Xiang agreed. Xian Zhen led the army and met the Qin forces at Yao, routed them, and returned with the commanders of Qin’s three armies as captives.

When Duke Mu of Qin heard the news, he put on plain mourning garments, went to the ancestral temple to weep and mourn, and explained his reasons to his ministers (“shuo” here means to explain or justify). Therefore Laozi said: “To be aware but not to display awareness is best; to be unaware yet to think oneself aware is a defect.”

II. Xue Gong Establishes a Queen

The queen of Qi died. The king of Qi wished to establish a new queen but delayed deciding and had his ministers discuss it. Xue Gong, that is Tian Ying, wanted to fathom the king’s mind, so he presented ten pairs of earrings and praised one pair as the most beautiful. The next day, by asking what had become of the most beautiful pair, he took the opportunity to urge the king to make their owner—the person Xue Gong had recommended—queen. The king was delighted and from then on regarded Xue Gong with particular favor.

Once a ruler’s intentions are revealed outwardly, he will be manipulated by his ministers. Therefore Laozi said: “Block the openings, shut the doors, and to the end of life there will be no toil.”

III. Lu Ao Meets an Extraordinary Adept

Lu Ao—a man of Yan, summoned by Qin Shi Huang as an erudite and ordered to seek immortals, after which he fled and never returned—traveled through the North Sea, passed through the land of Taiyin, entered Xuanque (Taiyin is the north; Xuanque is a northern mountain), came to the top of Mount Menggu (a mountain name), and met an extraordinary adept: his eye sockets were deeply sunken, his temple hair black, tears streaming down, his shoulders raised like a kite’s, his upper body full and his lower body thin, his bearing lofty; he was dancing into the wind. Seeing Lu Ao arrive, he slowly lowered his arms (“manran” means he stopped dancing) and withdrew into the shade of a stone tablet (the “bei” being the back of a stone tablet).

Lu Ao came closer and looked carefully: the man was sitting curled up (the people of Chu use “ju” for curling up) on a turtle shell, eating clams (sea mussels).

Lu Ao said to him: “Only I, Ao, have turned my back on the crowd, severed ties with my associates, and exhaustively surveyed beyond the six directions; if not I, who else could it be? Since childhood I have loved wandering, and even when grown I have not changed my resolve…”

(This passage is incomplete: Lu Ao is boasting of his resolve to wander; below there should be the adept’s response.)

Translator’s Note:

  • Yao: Mount Yao, site of the great Jin-Qin battle in the Spring and Autumn period; the original text has a missing-character box, filled in according to the Huainanzi.
  • The line “knowing yet not knowing” comes from chapter 52 of the Daodejing; the quotation here differs slightly.
  • The Lu Ao story comes from the “Chuzhen xun” chapter of the Huainanzi; it is used here to expound the meaning of “blocking the openings and closing the doors”—the true wandering adept does not show off or reveal traces, forming a contrast with Lu Ao’s self-praise.
渝周行四極唯北隂之未闚今卒覩夫子於 是子殆可與敖爲友乎若士者齤(音/拳)然而笑 曰嘻子中州之民寧肯而遠至此此猶光乎 日月(言太隂之地/尚見日月也)而載列星隂陽之所行四 時之所生其比夫不名之地猶窔奥也(言我/所游) (不可字名之地以盧敖而所/行比之則如窔奥奥室中也)若我南游乎岡 㝗之野北息乎沉墨之鄉西窮㝠㝠之黨東 開鴻濛之光此其下無地而上無天聽焉無 聞視焉無昫此其外猶有汰沃之汜(汰沃四/海子天) (之際水流聲/也汜涯也)其餘一舉而千萬里(千萬里汰/汜之外也) 吾猶未能之在(吾尚未/至此地)今子游始於此乃語 窮觀豈不亦遠哉然子處矣吾與汗漫期于 九垓之外(汗漫不可知之也/九垓九天之外)吾不可以久駐 若士舉臂而竦身遂入雲中盧敖仰而視之 弗見乃止駕(止其所/駕之車)止柸治(楚人謂恨不/得爲柸治也)悖 若有喪也曰吾比夫子猶黄鵠與蠰蟲也(蠰/蟲) (蟲之/幼也)終日行不離咫尺(八寸爲咫/十寸爲尺)而自以爲 遠豈不悲哉故莊子曰小人不及大人小知 不及大知朝菌不知晦朔(朝菌朝生暮死之/蟲也生水上狀似) (蠶蛾一名孳母/海南謂之蟲邪)蟪蛄不知春秋(蟪蛣/貂蟟)此言明
Interpretation

Lu Ao had once journeyed through the four quarters, but the dark and gloomy lands of the north were the only place he had never been. There he suddenly met a “Ruoshi” (a man who possessed the Dao), and asked, “Given your level of attainment, perhaps you would be willing to make friends with Lu Ao?”

Ruoshi puckered his face into a smile and said, “Ha—you are a man of the Central Plains, yet you were willing to come to such a distant place. It is true that here one can still see the light of the sun and moon and the movement of the constellations; the waxing and waning of Yin-Yang and the succession of the four seasons still remain. But compared with those hidden realms I often visit, realms that cannot even be named, this place is simply like a small, dark room.”

He continued, “I have gone south as far as the wilds of Gangsi; north, I rested in the land of Chenmo; west, I walked to the end of the dark and obscure; east, I could gaze upon the great light as when primordial chaos first opened. In that place below there is no earth, above no heaven; no sound is heard, no form is seen. Beyond it there is still a watery margin like Taiwo (legend says it lies at the horizon where the four seas meet, with the murmuring sound of water). Beyond that, a single step spans ten million li—and I have not truly reached even there. You have only just begun your travels from here, and already you speak of an ‘exhaustive view’ and of the end—is that not too soon and too far ahead? For now, keep to your own bounds. I have an appointment with ‘Hanman’ (the unknowable, boundless realm) to meet beyond the Nine Limits, so I cannot linger here.”

So saying, Ruoshi raised his arm, straightened himself, and leaped, vanishing into the clouds. Lu Ao looked up again, but the man was already gone. He halted his carriage, vexed and regretful (the people of Chu called this kind of melancholy regret “beizhi”), and felt bereft, as if he had lost something. He sighed, “Compared with this gentleman, I am like a mulberry grub beside a yellow swan—crawling all day, never able to go beyond a foot or a yard, yet thinking I have traveled far. Is that not pitiful?”

Thus Zhuangzi said: the petty man cannot match the great man, and small wisdom cannot match great wisdom. The morning mushroom (a tiny fungus that lives only from dawn to dusk; some resemble little water insects, and in Hainan it is also called chongxie) knows nothing of the dark of the moon and the new moon; the huigu (a summer insect, also called huijie or diaoliao) knows nothing of spring and autumn—these words speak precisely of how understanding has its bright and dark sides, and how one’s horizon has its greater and lesser dimensions.

之有所不見也季子治亶父三年(季子/子賤)而巫 馬期絻衣短褐(巫馬期孔/子弟子也)易容貌往觀化焉 (易服而往/微以視之)見夜魚釋之巫馬期問焉曰凡子 所爲魚者欲得也今得而釋之何也漁者對 曰季子不欲人取小魚也(古者魚不盈/尺不上俎也)所得 者小魚是以釋之巫馬期歸以報孔子曰季 子之德至矣使人闇行若有嚴刑在其側者 季子何以至於此孔子曰丘嘗問之以治言 曰誡於此者刑於彼季子必行此術也故老 子曰去彼取此罔兩問於景(罔兩水之精物/也景日月水光) (晷/也)曰昭昭者神明也(罔兩恍惚之物見/景光明以爲神也)景曰 非也罔兩曰子何以知之景曰扶桑受謝日 照宇宙(扶桑日所出之木也受謝/扶桑受日旦澤出之也)炤炤之光 輝燭四海闔户塞牖則無由入矣若神明四 通並流無所不及上際於天下蟠於地化育 萬物而不可爲象俛仰之間而撫四海之外 照照何足以明之故老子曰天下之至柔馳 騁天下之至堅光耀問於無有(光耀可見而/無有至虛者) 曰子果有乎其果無有乎(有形生於無形何/以能生物故問果) (有乎其/無有也)無有弗應也光耀不得問而就視其 狀貌㝠然忽然視之不見其形聽之不聞其 聲搏之不可得望之不可極也光耀曰貴矣
Interpretation

Some things are invisible to the naked eye. Jizi (also known as Zijian) governed Danfu for three years. Wuma Qi (a disciple of Confucius) changed into an ordinary silk upper garment and coarse cloth short clothes, altered his appearance, and went to observe the effectiveness of the moral education there (he changed clothes and went incognito to observe secretly).

He saw someone fishing at night and then releasing the fish. Wuma Qi asked: "Fishing is originally for getting fish; now you catch them and release them—why?" The fisherman replied: "Jizi does not want people to catch small fish." (In ancient times, fish less than a foot long were not presented on the sacrificial platter.) What he caught were all small fish, so he released them. Wuma Qi returned and reported to Confucius. Confucius said: "Jizi's De (Virtue/Power) has reached its utmost, causing people to act in secret as if severe punishment were beside them." Wuma Qi asked how Jizi could achieve this. Confucius said: "I once asked him about the way of governing a state. He said: 'Proclaim here, punish there.' Jizi must practice this technique." Therefore Laozi said: "Discard that and take this."

Wangliang (a kind of water spirit, a vague and unsettled spirit) asked Jing (the shadow cast by sunlight or moonlight on water): "Is the bright and clear one the divine brightness (Shenming)?" (Wangliang, being a vague and unsettled creature, sees the bright light and shadow and thinks it is the divine brightness.) Jing said: "No." Wangliang asked: "How do you know?" Jing said: "Fusang (the tree from which the sun rises) bears the sun and emerges, illuminating the universe (Fusang receives the sunlight, moistens and nourishes all things and rises). Its blazing radiance shines upon the four seas; but if doors are closed and windows sealed, the light has no way to enter. If the divine brightness (Shenming) flows through all four directions, reaching everywhere, extending above to heaven and coiling below to earth, nurturing all things without assuming form or image, and within a glance touches beyond the four seas—then how could that 'bright and clear' light be sufficient to be called divine brightness? Therefore Laozi said: The softest under heaven gallops through the hardest under heaven."

Guangyao (the visible) asked Wuyou (the ultimate void and formless): "Are you ultimately existent or nonexistent?" (Form arises from the formless; how can it generate the ten thousand things? Therefore he asked whether it is ultimately existent or nonexistent.) Wuyou did not answer. Guangyao could not ask again, so he approached to observe its appearance—it was dark and obscure, suddenly elusive; looking, one does not see its form; listening, one does not hear its sound; grasping, it cannot be caught; gazing, it cannot be exhausted. Guangyao said: "It is the most precious."

哉孰能至于此乎予能有無矣未能無無也 (言我能使形不可/得未能殊無形也)及其爲無無又何從至於 此哉故老子曰無有入于無間吾是以知無 爲之有益也白公勝慮亂(白公將爲父復讎/起兵亂因思慮之) (也)罷朝而立到杖策錣(音/針)上貫頤(策馬捶端/有針以刺) (馬謂之錣到杖/策故錣貫頤也)血流至地而弗知也鄭人聞 之曰頤之忘將何不忘哉(白公之父死鄭預/之故懼之也此) 言精神之越於外智慮之蕩於内則不能漏 理其形也(漏補/空也)是故神之所用者遠則所遺 者近也(近謂/身也)故老子曰不出户知天下不窺 牖以見天道其出彌遠其知彌少此之謂也 秦皇帝得天下恐不能守發邊戍築長城修 關梁設障塞具傳車置邊吏然劉氏奪之若 轉閉錘(閉錘格也上之錘所/以編薄席反覆之易)昔武王伐紂破 之牧野乃封比干之墓表商容之閭柴箕子 之門(紂死箕子亡之朝鮮/舊居空故柴護之)朝成湯之廟發鉅 橋之粟散鹿臺之錢破鼓折抱弛弓絶絃去 舍露宿以示平易解劍帶笏以示無仇於此 天下歌謡而樂之諸候執弊相朝三十四世 不奪故老子曰善閉者無關鍵而不可開也 善結者無繩約而不可解也尹需學御三年
Interpretation

[Vernacular Interpretation]

Who can reach such a state? One may claim to have already grasped “being” and “nonbeing,” yet still be unable to achieve complete “no-nonbeing” (“wu-wu”: letting go even the thought of “nonbeing”). But once one truly enters “no-nonbeing,” how can one still speak of “this”? Therefore Laozi says, “The substanceless enters the seamless”; from this I know that Wuwei (non-action) is indeed beneficial.

Bai Gong Sheng plotted rebellion (raising troops to avenge his father). After court dispersed, he still leaned on a needle-tipped horsewhip; the needle at its tip pierced his cheek, and though blood flowed to the ground, he was completely unaware. When the people of Zheng heard of this, they said: If he can forget even his cheek, what can he not forget? This means that when the spirit wanders outside and intellect and deliberation churn within, one cannot regulate the physical form (“leak” here means to fill gaps and keep guard). Therefore, if the mind and spirit are focused on what is far away, what is near—namely oneself—will be neglected. Laozi says, “Without leaving the door, one knows the world; without peering through the window, one sees the Dao of Heaven.” The farther one goes out, the less one knows—this is the situation referred to.

After Qin Shi Huang obtained the realm, fearing he could not keep it, he sent troops to garrison the frontiers, built the Great Wall, fortified passes and bridges, set up barriers and fortresses, established relay stations, and appointed frontier officials. Yet the Liu clan seized the realm as easily as turning a door latch. In former times, King Wu attacked Zhou and defeated him at Muye. He then honored Bi Gan’s tomb, commended Shang Rong’s lane, and fenced and protected Jizi’s gate with brushwood (after Zhou died, Jizi fled to Korea; his old dwelling stood empty, so it was protected with brushwood). He paid respects at the temple of Cheng Tang, released the grain of Juqiao, distributed the money of Lutai, broke the drums and snapped the drumsticks, slackened the bows and cut the strings, left the dwellings and slept in the open to show simplicity and ease, and had swords unfastened and court tablets worn to show that they bore no enmity. Thereupon the world sang songs and rejoiced in him; the feudal lords, holding jade, came to pay court; and for thirty-four generations they did not lose the realm. Therefore Laozi says, “One who is good at closing uses no bolt or lock, yet it cannot be opened; one who is good at binding uses no rope or cord, yet it cannot be untied.”

Yin Xu studied chariot driving for three years… (If the scriptural text below is incomplete, it may be continued according to the original book.)

而無得焉私自苦痛常寢想之(寢堅/思之)中夜夢 受秋駕於師(秋駕善/御之術)明日往朝師望之謂之 曰吾非受道於子也恐子不可予也今日教 子以秋駕尹需反走北面再拜曰臣有天幸 今夕固夢受之故老子曰致虛極守靜篤萬 物并作吾以觀其復也昔孫叔敖三得令尹 無喜志三去令尹無憂色延陵季子吴人願 一以爲王而不肯許由讓天下而弗受晏子 與崔杼盟臨死地不變其儀此皆有所遠通 也精神通於死生則物孰能惑之荆有佽非 得寳劍於干隊(干音寒干國在今臨淮出寳/劍蓋爲莫邪洞鄂之形也) 還反度江至於中流陽侯之波兩蛟俠繞其 舩(蛟龍屬也魚漏二千五/百斤蛟未爲之主也)佽非謂枻舩者(枻/櫂) 曰嘗有如此而得活者乎對曰未嘗見也於 是佽非瞑目勃然攘臂拔劍曰武士可以仁 義之禮說也不可劫而奪也此江中之腐肉 朽骨弃劍而已余有奚愛焉赴江刺蛟遂斷 其頭舩中人盡活風波畢除荆爵爲執圭孔 子聞之曰夫善載腐肉朽骨弃剱者飲非之 謂乎故老子曰夫唯無以生爲者是賢於貴 生焉齊人淳于髠以從說魏王魏王辯之約 車十乘將使荆辭而行人以爲從未足也復 以衡說其辭若然(從說說諸候之計當相從/也衡說從之非是當横更)
Interpretation

Plain-Language Interpretation

There was a man who sought something for a long time without obtaining it, and he suffered inwardly. He often lay down brooding, and in the middle of one night he dreamed that he had learned “autumn driving” from his master—that is, a superlative skill in charioteering. Early the next morning he went to pay his respects to the master. The master saw him from afar and said: “It was not that I transmitted the Dao to you; I was only afraid that you were not yet fit to receive it. Today I will teach you autumn driving.”

Yin Xu turned and ran; facing north, he bowed twice and said: “Your servant has had enormous good fortune. Last night I dreamed that I received instruction, and so today I dared to come.”

Therefore Laozi said: “Attain the utmost in emptiness; hold firmly to stillness. The myriad things arise together, and I watch their return.”—Empty the mind to the utmost, guard pure stillness, watch the myriad things arise together, and from this observe how they return to their origin.

In former times, Sunshu Ao was made Lingyin—the highest office in Chu—three times, and showed no joy; he was dismissed three times, and showed no sorrow. Someone wished to make Yanling Jizi, a worthy man of Wu, king, but he refused. Xu You declined and would not accept the world. Yanzi made a covenant with Cui Zhu, a powerful minister of Qi, and did not change his bearing even when facing death. All these men had minds that comprehended life and death, and external things could hardly shake them. If the spirit communicates with the principle of life and death, what could still delude a person?

In Chu there was a man named Ci Fei. He obtained a precious sword in Gandui—the state of Gan, in the area of present-day Linhuai. On his return he crossed a river. When the boat reached midstream, Yang Hou, Lord of the Waves, raised great waves, and two jiao—water dragons, fierce aquatic beasts—flanked the boat. Ci Fei said to the boatman: “Have you ever seen anyone survive a situation like this?” The answer was: “Never.” Thereupon Ci Fei closed his eyes, suddenly shook his arms, drew his sword, and said: “A warrior may be persuaded by the rites of benevolence and righteousness, but he cannot be robbed and despoiled. These are merely rotten flesh, decayed bones, and a discarded sword in the river—what do I have to begrudge?” Then he threw himself into the river and stabbed the jiao, cut off the jiao’s head, and everyone on the boat survived; the wind and waves also calmed. Chu enfeoffed him with the rank of Zhigui, a high noble title. When Confucius heard of it, he said: “One who can bear rotten flesh, decayed bones, and a discarded sword without sparing his life—that surely describes Ci Fei.”

So Laozi also said: “It is only one who does not make living his life the purpose of life who is superior to one who values life.”—Only one who does not take being alive as the foremost matter is wiser than those who “value life.”

Chunyu Kun of Qi first went to persuade the King of Wei with the strategy of Hezong, the vertical alliance. The King of Wei debated with him, agreed on ten chariots, and intended to send him to Chu. When he took leave, someone thought the Hezong strategy was still insufficient and again used the doctrine of Lianheng, the horizontal alliance; the wording seemed to fit better. (The “vertical” persuasion was a strategy urging the feudal lords to unite; the “horizontal” persuasion was to change to a horizontal alignment, the opposite of vertical.)

Note: The original text appears unfinished at the point where “he took leave, and someone thought the Hezong strategy was not yet sufficient, and again used the Lianheng persuasion; his words were like this.” If there are further paragraphs, you may send them and I will translate and read them together.

(計/也)魏王乃止其行而疏其身失從心志而有 不能成衡之事是其所以固也夫言有宗事 有本失其宗本技能雖多不若其寡也故周 鼎著倕而使齕其指先王以見大巧之不可 也故愼子曰匠人知爲門能以門(愼子名/到齊人)所 以不知門也(不知門/之要也)故必杜然後能門(門之/要在) (門/外)墨者有田鳩者(田鳩學墨/子之術也)欲見秦惠王約 車申轅(申/束)留於秦周年不得見客有言之楚 王者往見楚王楚王甚悅之予以節使於秦 至因見予之將軍之節惠王而說之出舍喟 然而歎告從者曰吾留秦三年不得見不識 道之可以從楚也物故有近之而遠遠之而 近者故大人之行不掩以繩(掩猶/憚也)至所極而 已矣此所謂筦子梟飛而維繩者(言爲士者/上下無常) (進退無恒不可繩也以喻飛梟從/下繩維之而欲翺翔則不可也)豐水之深 千仞而不受塵垢投金鐵鍼焉則形見於外 非不深且清也魚鼈龍蛇莫肯之歸也是故 石上不生五穀秃山不游麋鹿無所隂蔽隱 也昔趙文子問於叔向曰晋六將軍其孰先 亡乎(六將軍韓魏趙/范中行知伯也)對曰中行知氏文子曰 何乎對曰其爲政也以苛爲察以切爲明以 刻下爲忠以計多爲功譬之猶廓革者也廓
Interpretation

Vernacular Interpretation of the Huainanzi

The King of Wei therefore abandoned his former course, kept himself aloof and restrained, and lost his own judgment; in the end he could not accomplish even one great undertaking capable of “balancing”—such was the result of his stubbornness and rigidity.

Words must have roots, and affairs must have foundations. If one loses the root, no matter how many skills one has, it is not as good as carrying one thing through to the end. That is why the Zhou cauldrons were engraved with the story of Chui (a legendary craftsman skilled at making vessels): Chui made a cauldron, yet bit off his own fingers—the former kings wanted people to see that “great skill” cannot consist in endlessly showing off technique. Shen Dao (a man of Qi in the Warring States period and a thinker associated with Daoism) said: a craftsman knows “how to make a door,” but does not necessarily understand the essential meaning of “the door”; therefore he must first understand how to “block” (grasp the crux) before he can truly “complete the door” (so that the door can open and close, guard and pass).

Among the Mohists there was Tian Jiu, who studied Mozi’s arts and wished to see King Hui of Qin. He readied a carriage and bound its shafts, but stayed in Qin for a year without obtaining an audience. Someone said to him: Try Chu. He went to see the King of Chu, who liked him very much, gave him a tally, and sent him to Qin as an envoy. When he arrived in Qin, he used the general’s tally to seek audience with King Hui, and as soon as he spoke he was admitted. After leaving the guesthouse, he sighed deeply and said to his attendants: I stayed in Qin for three years without obtaining an audience; I never imagined that the “road” could be traveled through Chu. Thus it is with things: sometimes a near route turns out to be long, and a distant route turns out to be short. Therefore when the great man acts, he need not measure everything with plumb line and ink; he stops when he reaches the limit he should reach. This is what the common saying means: to tie an owl with a rope and still expect it to fly high—impossible. If a scholar has no constant standard in high or low matters and no fixed rule for advancing and retreating, it is likewise impossible, like tying a flying owl with a rope and demanding that it soar.

The Feng River is a thousand ren deep, yet it does not tolerate dust or dirt; throw a metal or iron needle into it, and its shape can immediately be seen from outside—it is not that the water is insufficiently deep or insufficiently clear, but that fish, turtles, dragons, and snakes are all unwilling to dwell there. Why? Because there is no shelter or cover to rely on. Thus the five grains cannot grow on rock, and deer do not come to dwell on barren mountains—all because there is “no shelter or cover.”

Formerly Zhao Wenzi asked Shu Xiang: Of the six generals of Jin, who will perish first? Shu Xiang said: the Zhonghang and Zhi clans. Wenzi asked: Why? Shu Xiang said: When they govern, they take harshness for clear-sightedness, sharpness for astuteness, fleecing the people for loyalty, and much calculation for merit—like scraping leather with a knife: the harder you scrape, the thinner the leather becomes, and soon it is gone.

之大則大矣裂之道也故老子曰其政悶悶 其民純純其政察察其民缺缺景公謂太卜 曰子之道何能對曰能動地(動/震)晏子往見公 公曰寡人問太卜曰子之道何能對曰能動 地地可動乎晏子默然不對出見太卜曰昔 吾見句星在房心之間地其動乎(句星客星/也駟房句) (星守房心/則地動也)太卜曰然晏子出太卜走往見公 曰臣非能動地地固將動也田子陽聞之(田/子) (陽齊/臣也)曰晏子默然不對者不欲太卜之死往 見太卜者恐公之欺也晏子可謂忠於上而 惠於下矣故老子曰方而不割廉而不劌魏 文侯觴諸大夫於曲陽飲酒酣文侯喟然嘆 曰吾獨無豫讓以爲臣子(豫讓事知伯而死/其難故文侯思以) (爲/臣)蹇重舉白而進之(蹇重文侯臣/也舉白進酒)曰請浮君 (浮猶罰也以/酒罰君也)君曰何也對曰臣聞之有命之 父母不知孝子有道之君不知忠臣夫豫讓 之君亦何如哉(豫讓相其君而君見/殺亦何如不足貴也)文侯受 觴而飲釂不獻(釂/盡)曰無管仲鮑叔以爲臣故 有豫讓之功故老子曰國家昏亂有忠臣孔 子觀桓公之廟(桓公魯/君也)有器焉謂之宥巵(宥/庒) (坐/右)孔子曰善哉乎得見此器顧曰弟子取水
Interpretation

This passage illustrates Laozi's political wisdom of "great wisdom appearing foolish" through several historical anecdotes.

Duke Jing of Qi once asked his Grand Diviner (official in charge of divination): "What special abilities do you possess?" The diviner replied: "I can make the earth shake." When Minister Yanzi heard this, instead of refuting it directly, he privately told the diviner: "In the past when I saw a comet (considered an ominous sign by ancients) appear between the constellations Fang and Xin, an earthquake did indeed occur. What you call 'making the earth shake' is merely recognizing the signs of an impending earthquake." Scholar Tian Ziyang commented that Yanzi's approach both prevented the diviner from being executed for deceiving the ruler and protected the duke from being misled, demonstrating loyalty to superiors and benevolence toward subordinates. This perfectly embodies Laozi's teaching that "the squarest corner does not pierce, the sharpest blade does not cut."

During a banquet, Marquis Wen of Wei lamented: "Why don't I have loyal ministers like Yu Rang (a righteous man who died avenging his lord Zhi Bo)?" His minister Jian Zhong raised his cup and advised: "Fortunate parents often cannot recognize their most filial child, just as wise rulers frequently fail to distinguish their most loyal ministers. The lord Yu Rang served ultimately met his demise - what's so praiseworthy about such loyalty?" After hearing this, the marquis drained his cup and sighed: "Precisely because I lack virtuous ministers like Guan Zhong and Bao Shuya, I would need martyrs like Yu Rang." This confirms Laozi's observation that "when the country falls into chaos, loyal ministers appear."

When Confucius saw a ritual vessel called the "Youzhi" (a wine vessel designed to warn against excessive drinking) in Duke Huan of Lu's temple, he immediately had disciples fetch water to demonstrate its "topple when full" property. This vessel's design embodies the Daoist principle of "things reversing upon reaching their extreme," reminding rulers that governance requires knowing moderation.

水至灌之其中則正(中水半/巵中也)其盈則覆孔子 造然革容曰善哉持盈者乎子貢在側曰請 問持盈曰揖而損之曰何謂揖而損之曰夫 物盛而衰樂極則悲日中而移月盈而虧是 故聦明叡知守之以愚多聞博辯守之以儉 武力毅勇守之以畏富貴廣大守之以陋德 施天下守之以讓此五者先王所以守天下 而弗失也反此五者未嘗不危也故老子曰 保此道者不欲盈夫唯不盈故能弊而不新 成武王問太公曰寡人伐紂天下是臣殺其 主而下伐其上也吾恐後世之用兵不休鬪 爭不已爲之柰何太公曰甚善王之問也夫 未得獸者唯恐其創之小也(獵禽恐之能殺/故恐其創小也) 已得之惟恐傷肉之多也王若欲久持之則 塞民於兊(兊耳目鼻口也老/子也曰塞其兊也)道全爲無用之 事煩擾之教彼皆樂其業供其情昭昭而道 㝠㝠於是乃去其瞀而載之木(瞀被髮也水/驚鳥冠也知) (文者/冠鶩)解其劍而帶之笏爲三年之喪令類不 蕃高辭卑讓使民不爭酒肉以通之竽瑟以 娱之鬼神以畏之繁文滋禮以弇其質厚葬 久喪以亶(音/丹)其家含珠鱗施綸組以貧其財 深鑿高壟以盡其力家貧族少慮患者貧以 此移風可以持天下弗失故老子曰化而欲 作吾將鎮之以無名之樸也 淮南鴻烈解卷之
Interpretation

Maintaining Fullness: When Water Is Full, It Overturns

When water is poured into a vessel and only filled halfway, the vessel stands upright and steady; once it is filled to the brim, it overturns.

When Confucius heard this, his expression changed, and he sighed in admiration: “How well he handles ‘fullness’!”

Zigong, standing nearby, asked: “May I ask what ‘maintaining fullness’ means?”

The answer: it is like bowing with hands clasped—actively diminishing and leaving room. What does this mean? When things reach their height, they decline; when joy reaches its extreme, it turns to sorrow; when the sun reaches noon, it begins to slant west; when the moon is full, it wanes. Therefore intelligence and sagacity should be guarded by “bluntness,” not showing off everywhere; broad experience and eloquence by “frugality and few words”; martial courage by “awe and caution”; wealth, honor, and greatness by “humility and lack of display”; and De exercised throughout the world by “modesty and yielding.” These five are why the former kings could long hold the world without losing it; to violate these five is to fall into danger without exception. Thus Laozi says: one who keeps this Dao “does not desire fullness”; precisely because he does not seek fullness to overflowing, he can be worn without rushing to renew himself and display novelty.

King Wu Asks Taigong: After Winning the War, Will Later Generations Always Fight?

King Wu asked Taigong: “I attacked King Zhou, and everyone in the world says this is a subject killing his lord, a subordinate offending his superior. I fear that later ages will not cease using arms and that strife will not stop. What should be done?”

Taigong said: “The king asks well. In hunting, before game is caught, one fears only that the wound is too small and does not hit a vital spot; once it is caught, one fears instead that the flesh is too much damaged and the meat beaten to pulp. If the king wishes to hold the world long, he must, like the latter, ‘spare strength and stop contention.’”

The specific methods include: blocking and gathering in the people’s ears, eyes, mouth, and nose—their senses and desires—which is what Laozi calls “blocking the openings”; doing more things that seem “useless” and less troublesome political teaching, so that people rest in their proper occupations and follow their natures; being outwardly bright and clear while inwardly undifferentiated and silent; removing ornamental refinements, such as loose hair and water-bird caps and similar ceremonial display, and bearing plain, uncarved wood; unbuckling the sword and replacing it with the tablet of office; practicing heavy rites such as three years of mourning so that kin multiply without cease; using lofty words and humble yielding to keep the people from contending; using wine and meat to facilitate human feeling, yu and se music for amusement, and ghosts and spirits to inspire awe; using elaborate formalities and multiplying ritual rules to suppress plain simplicity; making burials rich and mourning long to burden their households; placing pearls in the mouths of the dead, using scale ornaments, and distributing silk cords and ribbons to exhaust their wealth; digging deep graves and raising high mounds to use up their strength; and leaving every household poor, clans diminished, and many illnesses and troubles. By this set of measures for transforming customs, one can long hold the world without losing it.

Therefore Laozi says: once people have desires and actions that come after cultivation and nurture, one must use the “nameless uncarved simplicity” to settle them.

Explanation

Maintaining fullness is not the pursuit of fullness; rather, like a vessel filled only to the right measure and left with empty space, one actively “diminishes” a little to avoid “when full, it overturns.” “Bowing and diminishing it” means using humility and diminution to preserve what lasts, with the same purport as Laozi’s “not desiring fullness” below. The Taigong passage ostensibly discusses rites, mourning, burial, and the expenditure of wealth and strength; it is saying that heavy rites, lavish burials, and elaborate formalities keep people from acting rashly and from endless contention and war, and that “nameless uncarved simplicity” stops desire. This is a cold, severe strategy for “long holding the world” in a Daoist context, not a general Confucian celebration of ritual.

十八

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5f0018); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 18 Vol. 20 →