中文 · EN

《抱朴子內篇》Vol. 14

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taiqing 太清部 Vol. 14 / 20 4,698 characters

About this page. The original text of 《抱朴子內篇》 Vol. 14 (Taiqing 太清部, 20 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 10 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《抱朴子內篇》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

抱朴子内篇卷之十四守六    勤求 抱朴子曰天地之大德曰生生好物者也是 以道家之所至秘而重者莫過乎長生之方 也故血盟乃傳傳非其人戒在天罰先師不 敢以輕行授人須人求之至勤者猶當揀選 至精者乃教之況乎不好不求求之不篤者 安可衒其沽以告之哉其受命不應仙者雖 日見仙人成羣在世猶必謂彼自異種人天 下别有此物或呼爲鬼魅之變化或云偶值 於自然豈有肯謂修爲之所得哉苟心所不 信雖令赤松王喬言提其耳亦當同以爲妖 訛然時頗有識信者復患於不能勤求明師 夫曉至要得眞道者誠自甚稀非倉卒可值 也然知之者但當少耳亦未嘗絶於世也由 求之者不廣不篤有仙命者要自當與之相 值也然求而不得者有矣未有不求而得者 也世間自有奸僞圖錢之子而竊道士之號 者不可勝數也然此等復不肯挺無所知也 皆復粗開頭角或妄沽名加之以伏邪飾僞 而好事之徒不識其眞僞者徒多之進問自 取誑惑而拘制之不令得行廣尋奇士異人 而告之曰道盡於此矣以誤於有志者之不 少可歎可恚也或聞有曉消五雲飛八石轉 九丹治黃白水瓊(一作/槿)瑶花朱碧凝霜雪於 神爐採靈芝於嵩岳者則多而毁之曰此法 獨有赤松王喬知之今世之人而云知之者
Interpretation

The fourteenth chapter "Diligent Seeking" in the Inner Chapters of Baopuzi states: The greatest virtue (De) of heaven and earth is to nurture life and cherish all beings. Therefore, what Daoism values most and guards most closely are the methods of attaining immortality. When transmitting these methods, one must swear a blood oath (the most solemn ritual of commitment in ancient times). If they are revealed to the unworthy, divine punishment will follow. Thus, past masters never transmitted them lightly—only to seekers of utmost sincerity, rigorously tested, with the most devoted hearts deemed worthy. How much less, then, should these precious teachings be carelessly disclosed to those with no genuine interest or wavering commitment to the Dao?

Some are fated to have no connection with the path of immortality. Even if they saw immortals walking the earth daily, they would dismiss them as freaks of nature, demonic illusions, or mere coincidences, never believing such attainments came through cultivation. If the heart refuses to believe, even if immortals like Chisongzi or Wangziqiao (two renowned xian) grabbed their ears to explain, they would deem it demonic deception. Of course, some in the world do understand and believe, yet their flaw lies in failing to diligently seek true teachers. Those who genuinely grasp the essential methods and possess the authentic transmission are exceedingly rare—not casually encountered. Yet though few, such masters have never vanished from the world. With sincere, persistent seeking and unwavering faith, those destined for the path will eventually meet them.

The world teems with greedy fraudsters posing as Daoists, their numbers beyond counting. These charlatans are not entirely ignorant—they dabble in superficial knowledge, boastfully inflate their reputations, and embellish their acts with exorcism tricks. Eager but undiscerning seekers often approach them voluntarily, only to be deceived. These false masters further restrict disciples from seeking true adepts elsewhere, claiming, "All the Dao’s methods are here already." Countless earnest aspirants have been misled this way—a tragedy that stirs grief and outrage. When rumors spread of someone mastering techniques like "dissolving the five clouds, flying the eight minerals, transforming the nine elixirs" (terms for crafting immortality pills), or the art of creating gold and silver, crystallizing frost and snow in divine furnaces, or gathering lingzhi on Mount Song, many scoff: "Only Chisongzi and Wangziqiao knew such arts—how could anyone today understand them?"

皆虚妄耳則淺見之家不覺此言有詐僞而 作便息遠求之意悲夫可爲慨歎者也凌晷 飈飛暫少忽老迅速之甚諭之無物百年之 壽三萬餘日耳幼弱則未有所知衰邁則歡 樂並廢童豪昏耄除數十年而險隘憂病相 尋代有居世之年略消其半計定得百年者 喜笑平和則不過五六十年咄嗟滅盡哀憂 昏耄六七千日耳顧盻已盡矣況於全百年 者萬未有一乎諦而念之亦無以笑彼夏蟲 朝菌也蓋不知道者之所至悲矣里語有之 人在世間日失一日如牽牛羊以詣屠所每 進一步而去死轉近此譬雖醜而實理也達 人所以不愁死者非不欲求亦固不知所以 免死之術而空自焦愁無益於事故云樂天 知命故不憂耳非不欲久生也姬公請代武 王仲尼曳杖悲懷是知聖人亦不樂速死矣 俗人見莊周有大夢之諭因復競共張齊死 生之論蓋詭道强達陽作違抑之言皆仲尼 所爲破律應煞者也今察諸有此談者被疾 病則遽針灸冒危險則甚畏死然末俗通弊 不崇眞信背典誥而治子書若不吐反理之 巧辨者則謂之朴野非老莊之學故無骨殖 而取偶俗之徒遂流漂於不然之說而不能 自返也老子以長生久視爲業而莊周貴於 摇尾塗中不爲被綱之龜被綉之牛餓而求 粟於河侯以此知其不能齊死生也晩學不
Interpretation

Those with limited vision often fail to discern the falsehood and deception in such words, easily abandoning their pursuit of longevity—truly lamentable. Time flies like a tempest; in the blink of an eye, youth turns to old age with indescribable swiftness. A human lifespan of a hundred years amounts to barely thirty thousand days. Childhood is spent in ignorance, while old age is bereft of joy. Subtract decades of confusion and muddleheadedness, along with the afflictions of illness and worry, and the days one truly enjoys amount to less than half. Even if one lives to a hundred, the years of peace and happiness number no more than fifty or sixty—gone in an instant. Moreover, those who reach a full century are rarer than one in ten thousand. Upon reflection, we have no right to mock the summer insects that perish at dusk or the morning mushrooms that fade by evening, for those who fail to grasp this truth are truly pitiable.

There’s a saying among the people: "Each day a person lives, they are one day closer to death, like oxen and sheep being led to the slaughterhouse—every step brings them nearer to their end." Though harsh, this analogy speaks the truth. The wise do not grieve over death, not because they do not wish to live, but because they genuinely know no way to avoid it. Anxiety is futile, so they advocate contentment with fate. The Duke of Zhou (brother of King Wu of Zhou) once pleaded to die in his brother’s stead, and Confucius (styled Zhongni) leaned on his staff in old age, sighing in sorrow—proof that even sages do not wish to die prematurely.

When ordinary people read Zhuangzi’s (Zhuang Zhou) notion that "life is but a dream," they parrot arguments that life and death are no different. But these are mere sophistries—outwardly feigning transcendence while inwardly incapable of embodying it. Observe those who prattle about life and death: at the first sign of illness, they rush to doctors; faced with danger, they tremble in fear. The vulgar malady of our age lies in failing to revere the true Dao, abandoning the classics while indulging in the doctrines of various philosophers. Anyone who refrains from spouting contrarian platitudes is deemed crude and shallow. These people understand nothing of the essence of Laozi and Zhuangzi’s thought—they merely drift with the tide, drowning in absurdities they cannot escape.

Laozi sought "long life and enduring vision" (chang sheng jiu shi), while Zhuangzi preferred to be a turtle wagging its tail in the mud rather than one caught in a net or an ox draped in sacrificial brocade—even begging the river god for food. From this, it’s clear Zhuangzi could not truly equate life and death either. As for later scholars...

能考校虚實偏據一句不亦謬乎且夫深入 九泉之下長夜岡極始爲螻蟻之粮終與塵 壤合體令人怛然心熱不覺咄嗟若心有求 生之志何可不棄置不急之事以修玄妙之 業哉其不信則已矣其信之者復患違俗情 之不蕩盡而不能專以養生爲意而營世務 之餘暇而爲之所以或有違之者恒病晩而 多不成也凡人之所汲汲者勢利嗜欲也苟 我身之不全雖高官重權金玉成山妍艷萬 計非我有也是以上士先營長生之事長生 定可以任意若未昇玄去世可且地仙人間 若彭祖老子止人中數百歲不失人理之懽 然後徐徐登遐亦盛事也然决須好師師不 足奉亦無由成也昔漢太后從夏侯勝受尚 書賜勝黄金百斤他物不可勝數及勝死又 賜勝家錢二百萬爲勝素服一百日成帝在 東宫時從張禹受論語及即尊位賜禹爵關 内侯食邑千户拜光禄大夫賜黄金百斤又 遷丞相進爵安昌侯年老乞骸骨賜安車駟 馬黄金百斤錢數萬及禹疾天子自臨省之 親拜禹牀下章帝在東宫時從桓榮以受孝 經及帝即位以榮爲大常上卿天子幸榮第 令榮東面坐設几杖會百官及榮門生生姪 數百人帝親自持業講說賜榮爵關内侯食 邑五千户及榮病天子幸其家入巷下車把 卷而趨如弟子之禮及榮薨天子爲榮素服
Interpretation

This passage discusses how people often become obsessed with worldly fame and profit while neglecting the vital practice of nurturing life and cultivating the Dao. The author makes a striking contrast: after death, when buried underground, one ultimately becomes nothing more than food for ants, merging with dust—shouldn't this inevitable end fill us with dread? Those who sincerely seek longevity should abandon trivial worldly affairs and devote themselves wholeheartedly to the profound practice of Daoist methods.

As for those who don't believe in the path to longevity—let them be. But even among believers, many cannot concentrate on Dao cultivation because they remain attached to worldly desires. They often try to practice only during leftover moments after handling mundane matters, starting too late to achieve success. Ordinary people exhaust themselves chasing power, profit, and desires, but what meaning do high official positions, piles of gold and silver, or beautiful wives and concubines hold if one cannot even preserve one's life (xing) and vital essence (ming)?

Thus, truly wise individuals (superior scholars, shangshi) prioritize the pursuit of longevity. After attaining the Dao of long life, one gains freedom to choose their path: either ascend as an immortal (xian) or remain in the human realm as an earthly immortal (dixian, terrestrial transcendents in Daoism). Like Pengzu (the legendary immortal who lived eight hundred years) and Laozi, one could live for centuries among humans, enjoying worldly pleasures before gradually ascending—an equally admirable choice. However, such cultivation absolutely requires guidance from an enlightened teacher (mingshi); success is nearly impossible without proper instruction.

The text then cites examples from the Han Dynasty to illustrate the importance of honoring teachers and revering the Dao: Empress Dowager of Emperor Xuan studied the Book of Documents (Shangshu) under Xiahou Sheng, rewarding him with generous gold; Emperor Cheng studied the Analects (Lunyu) with Zhang Yu while crown prince, later ennobling him; Emperor Zhang learned the Classic of Filial Piety (Xiaojing) from Huan Rong and personally performed disciple rites at his teacher's home after ascending the throne. These examples emphasize that even emperors showed such reverence for teachers—how much more must ordinary people seeking longevity rely on enlightened guidance.

凡此諸君非能攻城野戰折衝拓境懸旌効 節(一作/郊坰)祈連方轉元功騁鋭絶域也徒以一 經之業宣傳章句而見尊重巍巍如此此但 能說死人之餘言耳帝王之貴猶自卑降以 敬事之世間或有欲試修長生之道者而不 肯謙下於堪師者直爾蹴迮從求至要寧可 得乎夫學者之恭遜驅走何益於師之分寸 乎然不爾則是彼心不盡彼心不盡則令人 告之不力告之不力則秘訣何可悉得邪不 得已當以浮淺示之豈足以成不死之功哉 亦有人皮膚好喜而信道之誠不根心神有 所索欲陽爲曲恭累日之間怠慢已出若值 明智之師且欲詳觀來者變態試以淹久故 不告之以測其志則若此之人情僞行露亦 終不得而教之教之亦不得盡言吐實言不 了則爲之無益也陳安世者年十三歲蓋灌 叔本之客子耳先得仙道叔本年七十皓首 朝夕拜安世曰道尊德貴先得道者則爲師 矣吾不敢倦執弟子之禮也由是安世告之 要方遂復仙去矣夫人生先受精神於天地 後禀氣於父母然不得明師告之以度世此 道則無由免死鑿石有餘焰年命已凋頽矣 由此論之明師之恩誠爲過於天地重於父 母多矣可不崇之乎可不求之乎抱朴子曰 古人質正貴行賤言故爲政者不尚文辨修 道者不崇辭說風俗衰薄外飾彌繁方策既
Interpretation

These renowned historical figures did not earn reverence through military conquests or territorial expansion. They attained such profound respect simply by mastering a single classic and transmitting its teachings—merely reiterating the words of ancient sages, yet even emperors humbled themselves before them. Some people today seek the Dao of immortality, yet refuse to approach enlightened masters with genuine humility. Arrogantly demanding secret formulas—how could they possibly receive true transmission?

A student's reverent attitude brings no material benefit to the master. Yet without it, the master perceives insincerity; sensing insincerity, the master withholds complete teaching; without full transmission, how can one obtain the complete method? In such cases, the master may reluctantly impart superficial techniques—how could these possibly achieve immortality? Others feign respect while secretly doubting the Dao, motivated only by selfish desires. Their pretense of humility soon gives way to disrespect. A wise master deliberately observes such aspirants over time, withholding transmission to test their sincerity. These hypocrites ultimately fail to receive true teaching, and even if given partial instruction, cannot fully comprehend it. Without complete understanding, their practice is futile.

Chen Anshi was merely thirteen years old, originally a page in Guan Shuben's household. Yet when he attained immortality first, the seventy-year-old Guan Shuben knelt before him daily, saying: "The Dao's law is sacred—he who attains it first becomes the teacher." Maintaining this disciple's devotion unwaveringly, Anshi ultimately transmitted the secret formula to him, and Shuben too achieved immortality. Though humans receive their Shen (spirit) from heaven and earth, and their physical form from parents, without an enlightened master to transmit the way of transcendence, they inevitably face death—like sparks struck from stone, fleeting and transient. Thus we see the enlightened master's kindness truly surpasses heaven and earth, outweighing even parental bonds. How could we not revere them? How could we not seek them?

Ge Hong (Baopuzi) said: The ancients valued substance over words—thus rulers governed without empty rhetoric, and cultivators prized not eloquence but practice. Now customs degenerate, external embellishments grow ever more elaborate, and though texts pile mountain-high, none can read them all.

山積於儒門而内書亦鞅掌於術家初學之 徒即未便可授以大要又亦人情以本末殷 富者爲快故後之知道者于吉容嵩桂帛諸 家各著千所篇然率多教誠之言不肯善爲 人開顯大向之指歸也其至眞之訣或但口 傳或不過尋尺之素在領帶之中非隨師經 久累勤歷試者不能得也雜猥弟子皆各隨 其用心之踈密履苦之久遠察其聦明之所 逮及志力之所能辨各有所授千百歲中時 有盡其囊枕之中肘腋之下秘要之耳或但 將之合藥藥成分之足以使之不死而已而 終年不以其方文傳之故世間道士知金丹 之事者萬無一也而管見之屬謂仙法當具 在於紛若之書及於祭祀拜伏之間而已矣 夫長生制在大藥耳非祠醮之所定也昔秦 漢二代大興祈禱所祭太乙五神陳寳八神 之屬動用牛羊穀帛錢費億萬了無所益況 於疋夫德之不備體之不養而欲以三牲酒 餚祝願鬼神以索延年惑亦甚矣或頗有好 事者誠欲爲道而不能勤求明師合作異藥 而但晝夜誦講不要之書數千百卷詣老無 益便謂天下果無仙法或舉門扣頭以向空 坐烹宰犧牲燒香請福而病者不愈死䘮相 襲破産竭財一無奇異終不悔悟自謂未篤 若以此之勤求知方之師以此之費給買藥 求明師秘術之直者亦必得神仙長生度世
Interpretation

Confucian scholars accumulated vast collections of texts, while Daoist practitioners also possessed numerous manuals on cultivation techniques. Beginners could not immediately receive the core teachings, as people often pursued superficial abundance. Later adepts like Yu Ji, Rong Song, and Gui Bo each composed many writings, yet most contained only admonitory words, reluctant to explicitly reveal the true essence of the Great Dao (Da Dao). The most essential secrets were either transmitted orally or written on less than a foot of silk, concealed in collars or belts. Only those who followed their masters for years, practiced diligently, and proved themselves worthy could obtain these genuine transmissions.

Masters would impart teachings according to each disciple's varying capacities—their dedication, endurance, wisdom, and willpower. Over millennia, only occasionally would someone receive the secrets hidden beneath a master's pillow or sleeve. Sometimes disciples merely assisted in preparing medicines, receiving portions after completion; though these elixirs could confer immortality, the masters would never write down the formulas before death. Thus among Daoist practitioners in the world, scarcely one in ten thousand truly understood the Great Dao of the Golden Elixir (Jindan).

Those with shallow understanding assumed immortal techniques were recorded in voluminous texts or existed within bowing rituals. Yet the path to longevity fundamentally lay in refining the Great Medicine (Golden Elixir), never determined by sacrifices. The Qin and Han dynasties had lavished worship on deities like Taiyi, the Five Directional Gods, Chenbao, and the Eight Spirits, squandering countless livestock, silks, and treasures—all without effect. How much more absurd for ordinary people, lacking virtue (De) and physical cultivation, to seek life extension from spirits through sacrificial animals and wine!

Others, though interested in cultivation, neglected to diligently seek enlightened masters or refine elixirs. They merely recited irrelevant texts day and night—hundreds or thousands of scrolls—growing old without benefit, then declaring immortality nonexistent. Whole families might bow to empty air, slaughter animals, and burn incense, yet illnesses persisted and deaths followed one after another. Even after bankrupting themselves without results, they remained unenlightened, blaming insufficient piety. Had they devoted such effort to finding true masters and spent their wealth on acquiring medicines and secret transmissions, they surely could have attained immortality and eternal life.

也何異詣老空耕石田而望千倉之收用力 雖盡不得其所也所謂適楚而道燕雖良馬 而不到非行之不疾然失其道也或有性信 而喜信人其聦明不足以校練眞僞揣測深 淺所博涉素狹不能賞物後世頑淺趣得一 人自譽之子云我有秘書便守事之而庸人 小兒多有外託有道之名名過其實由於誇 誑内抱貪濁惟利是圖有所請爲强喑嗚俛 仰抑揚若所知寳秘乃深而不可得之狀其 有所請從其所求俛仰含笑或許以頃後故 使不覺者欲罷而不能自謂事之未勤而禮 幣之尚輕也於是篤信之心尤加恭肅賂以 珠玩爲之執奴僕之役不辭負重涉遠不避 經險履危欲以積勞自効服苦求哀庻有異 聞而虚引歲月空委二親之供養捐妻子而 不䘏戴霜蹈氷連年隨之而妨資棄力卒無 所成彼初誠欺之未或慙之懵然體中實自 空罄短乏無能法以相教將何法以成人乎 余目見此輩不少可以有十餘人或自號高 名久居於世世或謂之已三四百歲但易名 字詐稱聖人託於人間而多有丞事之者余 但不喜書其人之姓名耳頗遊俗間凡夫不 識妍蚩爲共吹揚增長妖妄爲彼巧僞之人 虚生華譽歙習遂廣莫能甄别故或令高人 偶不留意澄察而但任兩耳者誤於學者常 待此輩莫不使人歎息也每見此曹欺誑天
Interpretation

This passage describes several common pitfalls on the path of Daoist cultivation, akin to heading toward Yan when one intends to reach Chu—no matter how fine the steed, the destination remains unreachable. The problem isn't insufficient speed, but fundamentally wrong direction.

Some people are naturally credulous, prone to blind devotion without discernment. With shallow understanding, they encounter self-proclaimed masters boasting "I possess secret Daoist methods" and pledge unwavering allegiance. In truth, many vulgar individuals merely don the empty title of cultivation masters, their reputations exceeding reality. Driven by greed and profit, they deliberately affect an air of profundity. When seekers approach them, these charlatans feign mystery—nodding and shaking their heads—leading disciples to believe their sincerity remains inadequate. Thus the seekers redouble their devotion, offering material goods, even willingly serving as beasts of burden, traversing mountains and rivers in pursuit.

Years pass in vain: parental duties neglected, spouses and children abandoned, hardships endured—yet nothing gained. These so-called "masters" were deceitful from the outset, watching followers bankrupt themselves without remorse. Hollow within, they possess no genuine knowledge to impart.

I've personally witnessed dozens such imposters—some claiming centuries of age, constantly changing names to pose as sages while swindling their way through society. Ordinary people, unable to distinguish truth from falsehood, amplify their fame, perpetuating this corruption. Once these frauds establish reputations through deception, their followings swell. Even genuine masters may occasionally be deceived—a truly lamentable situation. Each encounter with such charlatans stirs profound reflection.

下以規勢利者遲速皆受殃罰天綱雖踈終 不漏也但悟有志者可念耳世人多逐空聲 鮮能校實聞甲乙多弟子至以百許必當有 異便載馳兢逐赴爲相聚守之徒妨工夫以 崇重彼愚陋之人也而不復尋精彼得門人 之力或以致富辨逐之雖久猶無成人之道 愚夫故不知此人不足可事何能都不與悟 自可悲哉夫搜尋仞之壟求干天之木漉牛 迹之中索吞舟之鱗用日雖久安能得乎嗟 乎將來之學者雖當以求師爲務亦不可以 不詳擇爲急也陋狹之夫行淺德薄功微縁 少不足成人之道亦無功課以塞人重恩也 深思其趣勿令徒勞也抱朴子曰諸虚名之 道士既善爲誑詐以欺學者又多護短慝愚 恥於不知陽若以博涉已足終不肯行求請 問於勝己者急爾守窮面墻而立又不但拱 默而已乃復增忌於實有道者而謗毁之恐 披聲名之過已也此等豈有意於長生之法 哉爲欲以合致弟子圖其財力以快其情欲 而已耳而不知天高聽卑其後必受斯殃也 夫貧者不可妄云我富也賤者不可虚云我 貴也況道德之事實無而空養門生弟子乎 凡俗之人猶不冝懷妬善之心況於道士尤 應以忠信快意爲生者也云何當以此之𠍯 然函胸臆間乎人自不能聞見神明之聞見 己之甚易也此何異乎在紗幌之外不能察
Interpretation

This passage cautions about the importance of carefully selecting a Daoist master and not being misled by empty reputations. Those who chase fame and profit, whether swiftly or slowly, will ultimately meet misfortune. Though the Dao of Heaven may seem lenient, it never fails to account for wrongdoing. Only those genuinely committed to cultivating the Dao will comprehend this truth.

Most people in the world pursue hollow fame and superficial glamour, rarely able to distinguish the genuine from the false. When they hear that a certain Daoist priest (referred to as "A" or "B") has hundreds of disciples, they assume he must possess extraordinary abilities and rush to seek him out. Yet these gathered followers often hinder each other’s cultivation, blindly revering masters who are actually ignorant and shallow. They no longer seek the true, profound teachings of the Dao, relying instead on gathering disciples to amass wealth. After years of such pursuit, they still fail to attain the Dao. The ignorant fail to realize that these masters are unworthy of following—truly a lamentable state!

It is like searching for towering trees in a pile of dirt no higher than ten feet, or seeking fish large enough to swallow boats in puddles left by oxen hooves—no matter how much time is spent, they will never be found. Future seekers of the Dao, though it is important to study under a master, one must not rush into choosing without discernment. Those with shallow insight, meager virtue (De), and feeble cultivation, who have not even attained the Dao themselves—how can they guide others? They are utterly incapable of repaying the sincere devotion of their disciples. Reflect deeply on this truth, lest effort be wasted in vain.

Those Daoists with empty reputations are skilled in deceit, tricking seekers while concealing their own shortcomings. Though ignorant, they pretend to vast learning, never willing to consult those more accomplished than themselves. Stagnation is bad enough, but worse still, they envy those who truly embody the Dao, slandering them out of fear that others’ reputations might surpass their own. How could such people genuinely pursue the path of immortality? Their mass recruitment of disciples is merely a means to amass wealth and indulge in pleasures. Little do they know that Heaven observes all with perfect clarity, and retribution will surely come in time.

The poor should not falsely claim wealth, nor the lowly pretend to nobility—how much more so in the matter of cultivating the Dao, which demands real substance? How can one rely on empty displays of discipleship to embellish appearances? Ordinary people should not harbor jealousy, and Daoist practitioners should establish themselves in loyalty and sincerity. Why allow such petty thoughts to fester in the heart? Though humans cannot see the divine, the gods observe mortals with ease—just as one might struggle to see through a curtain from within, while those outside can clearly see inside.

軒房之内而肆其倨慢謂人之不見己此亦 如竊鍾棖物鍾然有聲惡他人聞之因自掩 其耳者之類也而聾𥌒之存乎精神者唯欲 專擅華名獨聚徒衆外求聲價内規財力患 疾勝己乃劇於俗人之爭權勢也遂以唇吻 爲刃鋒以毁譽爲朋黨口親心踈貎合行離 陽敦同志之言陰挾蜂蠆之毒此乃天人所 共惡招禍之符檄也夫讀五經猶冝不恥下 問以進德修業日有緝熙至於射御之麤伎 書數之淺功農桑之露事䂓矩之小術尚須 師授以盡其理況營長生之法欲以延年度 世斯與救䘏死事無異也何可務惜請受之 名而永守無知之困至老不改臨死不悔此 亦天民之篤暗者也令人代之慙悚爲之者 獨不顧形影也爲儒生尚當兀然守朴外託 質素知而如否有而如無令庸兒不得盡其 稱稱而不問不對對必辭讓而後言何其道 士之人强以不知爲知以無有爲有虚自衒 曜以圖奸利者乎迷而不知返者愈於遂往 若有以行此者想不恥改也吾非苟爲此言 誠有爲而興所謂疾之而不能默然也徒愍 念愚人不忍見嬰兒之投井耳若覽之而悟 者亦仙藥之一草也吾何爲哉不御苦口其 危至矣不俟脉診而可知者也抱朴子曰設 有死罪而人能救之者必不爲之吝勞辱而 憚卑辭也必獲生生之功也今雜猥道士之
Interpretation

This passage criticizes the hypocrisy of certain contemporary Daoist practitioners who feign spiritual cultivation while actually pursuing fame and profit, completely contradicting the true spirit of Daoist practice.

Some act arrogantly and discourteously in private, believing no one sees them—like the foolish thief who covers his own ears while stealing a bell, deafened by its ringing. These individuals inwardly crave exclusive prestige and flocks of disciples, outwardly chasing reputation while inwardly hoarding wealth. They envy those superior to them, competing for power and profit more fiercely than worldly people. Wielding words like swords, they form factions by slandering others, appearing close while keeping distance, feigning shared ideals while concealing malice. Such behavior is detested by Heaven, Earth, and humanity alike—a sure path to calamity.

Even when studying the Confucian Five Classics, one must seek guidance humbly to cultivate virtue. How much more so for basic skills like archery and charioteering, rudimentary knowledge like writing and arithmetic, everyday tasks like farming and sericulture, or fundamental disciplines like rituals and etiquette—all require a teacher’s instruction to grasp their essence. How then can the pursuit of immortality and longevity, the Daoist path of cultivation, be any different? It is no less than saving lives—how can one cling to pride and refuse to seek guidance, persisting in ignorance until old age and death without repentance? Such people are utterly foolish, a disgrace to behold.

True Confucian scholars understand the value of simplicity, appearing humble, feigning ignorance despite knowledge, seeming empty despite fullness, never courting praise from the vulgar. Why then do some Daoists pretend to know what they do not, claim what they lack, and inflate their image for selfish gain? Those who persist in delusion are more pitiable than those who knowingly err. If any such person reads this, may they repent while there is still time. These words are not spoken idly—they arise from necessity, like the instinct to save a child from falling into a well.

If anyone awakens upon reading this, it is as though they have received an elixir of immortality. Why say more? Bitter medicine saves lives—the danger here needs no diagnosis. Just as one would spare no effort or kind words to rescue someone condemned to death, for such a deed brings immense merit. But today, those impostors among the Daoists...

輩不得金丹大法必不得長生可知也雖治 病有起死之効絶穀則積年不飢役使鬼神 坐在立亡瞻視千里知人盛衰發沉崇於幽 翳知禍福於未萌猶無益於年命也尚羞行 請求恥事先達是惜一日之屈而甘岡極之 痛是不見事類者也古人有言曰生之於我 利亦大焉論其貴賤雖爵爲帝王不足以此 法比焉論其輕重雖富有天下不足以此術 易焉故有死王樂爲生鼠之諭也夫治國而 國平治身而身生非自至也皆有以致之也 惜短乏之虚名恥師授之蹔勞雖曰不愚吾 不信也今使人免必死而就戮刑者猶欣然 喜於去重而即輕脫炙爛而保視息甘其苦 痛過於更生矣人但莫知當死之日故不蹔 憂耳若誠知之而刖劓之事可得延期者必 將爲之况但躬親灑掃執巾竭力於勝己者 可以見教之不死之道亦何足爲苦而蔽者 憚焉假令有人恥迅走而待野火之燒熱羞 逃風而致沉溺於重淵者世必呼之爲不曉 事也而咸知笑其不避災危而莫怪其不畏 實禍何哉抱朴子曰昔者之著道書多矣莫 不務廣浮巧之言以崇玄虚之㫖未有究論 長生之階徑箴爲道之病痛如吾之勤勤 者也實欲令迷者知反失之東隅收之桑榆 墜井引綆愈於遂没但惜美病而距惡石者 不可如何耳人誰無過過而能改日月之蝕
Interpretation

This passage is from Baopuzi Neipian (Inner Chapters of the Master Who Embraces Simplicity), where Ge Hong discusses the essence of attaining longevity through Daoist cultivation. He explicitly states that without mastering the methods of the Golden Elixir (Jindan) path, true immortality cannot be achieved. Even if some possess abilities to heal diseases, revive the dead, fast for years without hunger, command spirits, teleport, foresee fortunes with clairvoyance—these supernatural powers offer no substantial aid in prolonging life.

Ge Hong criticizes those unwilling to humbly seek guidance: to protect their vanity, they feel ashamed to learn from masters, preferring prolonged suffering over temporary humility. He employs a vivid analogy: this is like someone choosing to burn in a wildfire rather than flee—a folly all would mock. Similarly, while immortality could be attained by studying under a master, refusing due to fear of hardship is true foolishness.

The text emphasizes the preciousness of life: neither imperial power nor worldly wealth can purchase the methods of longevity. As the ancients said, "A dead emperor is inferior to a living rat," for both governing the world and self-cultivation require correct methods to succeed. Ge Hong laments that people delay seeking immortality only because they don’t know when death will come. If aware of impending death, they would endure torture to extend life—let alone something as simple as humbly learning from a master.

Finally, Ge Hong explains his purpose in writing: while past Daoist texts often indulged in empty abstractions, he concretely outlines practical methods for longevity and common pitfalls, like guiding the lost. Quoting the adage "eclipses of the sun and moon," he notes that all err, but the key is to correct mistakes. This passage reflects Daoism’s emphasis on practice and the pursuit of immortality, as well as Ge Hong’s pragmatic demands for cultivators.

晞顔氏之子也又欲使將來之好生道者審 於所託故竭其忠告之良謀而不飾淫麗之 言言發則指切筆下則辭痛惜在於長生而 折抑邪耳何所索哉抱朴子曰深念學道藝 養生者隨師不得其人竟無所成而使後之 有志者見彼之不得長生因云天下之果無 仙法也凡自度生必不能苦身約己以修玄 妙者亦徒進失干禄之業退無難老之功内 誤其身外沮將來也仙之可學致如黍稷之 可播種得甚炳然耳然未有不耕而獲嘉禾 未有不勤而獲長生度世也 抱朴子内篇卷之
Interpretation

This passage records Ge Hong (Daoist name Baopuzi) expounding on the fundamental principles of Daoist cultivation and life nourishment. He compares himself to the ancient sage Yan Hui (the disciple of Confucius), wishing to illuminate the correct path for future seekers of longevity, thus offering unreserved advice without ornate rhetoric. Every sentence he writes strikes at the heart of the matter with sincere words, aiming to help people truly comprehend the Dao of longevity while refuting erroneous beliefs.

Ge Hong particularly emphasizes: many who study life-nourishing cultivation fail to achieve anything because they never find a genuine enlightened master. This leads later aspiring cultivators, seeing their predecessors' failures, to mistakenly believe no genuine methods for attaining immortality exist. In truth, those unwilling to discipline themselves rigorously or endure hardships in practicing the profound Daoist methods not only forfeit worldly success (career advancement) but also fail to attain life-extending benefits (the achievement of delayed aging). They harm themselves while misleading future generations.

He offers a vivid analogy: attaining immortality can be learned, just as millet and grain can be clearly sown and harvested. But no one ever reaps good crops without tilling the fields—likewise, without diligent practice, one cannot possibly attain the abilities of longevity and transcendence from worldly existence. Here "transcending the mundane world" (度世) refers to achieving a state beyond ordinary existence through cultivation.

十四

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5f0019); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 13 Vol. 15 →