中文 · EN

《抱朴子外篇》Vol. 22

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taiqing 太清部 Vol. 22 / 51 2,701 characters

About this page. The original text of 《抱朴子外篇》 Vol. 22 (Taiqing 太清部, 51 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 6 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《抱朴子外篇》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

抱朴子外篇卷之二十二    行品 抱朴子曰擬玄黄之覆載揚明並以表微文 彪昺而備體澄獨見以入神者聖人也禀高 亮之純粹抗峻摽以邈俗虚靈機以如愚不 貳過而謟黷者賢人也居寂寞之無爲蹈脩 直而執平者道人也盡烝嘗於存亡保髮膚 以揚名者孝人也垂惻隱於有生恒恕己以 接物者仁人也端身命以徇國經嶮難而一 節者忠人也覿微理於難覺料倚伏於將來 者明人也量理亂以卷舒審去就以保身者 智人也順通塞而一情任性命而不滯者達 人也不枉尺以直尋不降辱以苟命者雅人 也據體度以動靜每清詳而無悔者重人也 體冰霜之粹素不染潔於勢利者清人也篤 始終於寒暑雖危亡而不猜者義人也守一 言於久要歷歲衰而不渝者信人也摛銳藻 以立言辭炳蔚而清允者文人也奮果毅之 壯烈騁干戈以靜難者武人也甄墳索之淵 奥該前言以窮理者儒人也銳乃心於精義 吝寸隂以進德者益人也識多藏之厚亡臨 禄利而如遺者廉人也不改操於得失不傾 志於可欲者貞人也卹急難而忘勞以憂人 爲己任者篤人也潔皎分以守終不遜厚而 苟免者節人也飛清機之英麗言約暢而判 滯者辯人也每居卑而推功雖處泰而滋恭 者謙人也崇惇睦於九族必居正以赴理者
Interpretation

Ge Hong's "Outer Chapters of the Master Who Embraces Simplicity: On Conduct and Character" provides detailed descriptions of exemplary figures embodying various noble virtues:

The sage comprehends the patterns of heaven and earth (Xuanhuang denotes the cosmos), illuminating both the manifest and the subtle, with insights so profound they verge on the divine. The worthy possess innate purity and integrity, transcending worldly concerns without ostentation, and though they may err, they never repeat their mistakes.

The Daoist adept dwells in serene wuwei (non-action), upholding principles of impartial rectitude. The filial devote themselves to ancestral rites (Zhengchang refers to sacrificial offerings), cherishing their physical form to honor family legacy. The benevolent extend compassion to all beings, always practicing empathetic consideration.

The loyal sacrifice themselves for their nation, preserving moral integrity through adversity. The perceptive discern hidden truths, foreseeing transformations of fortune. The wise understand timing and circumstance, ensuring self-preservation. The enlightened maintain equanimity through life's vicissitudes, harmonizing with their innate nature.

The refined would rather suffer injustice than compromise principle; the prudent act with measured deliberation. The pure remain unsullied as ice, untainted by power or profit. The righteous stay constant even in peril, never abandoning their purpose. The trustworthy honor commitments unaltered by passing years.

The literary craft elegant yet balanced discourse; the martial demonstrate decisive bravery in quelling chaos. The Confucian masters master ancient texts (Fensuo denotes classical canons), exhaustively studying ancestral wisdom. The diligent delve into subtle truths, treasuring time for moral cultivation.

The incorruptible understand wealth invites calamity, discarding material gain like worn sandals. The chaste remain unmoved by fortune or desire. The devoted prioritize others' needs above their own, embracing neighbors' sorrows as personal burdens. The disciplined maintain impeccable conduct without compromise, unshaken by coercion.

The eloquent wield sharp reasoning and fluid speech to resolve perplexities. The humble grow more reverent with higher achievement. Finally, those who cherish familial harmony while steadfastly upholding proper governance.

(Note: This scripture presents Ge Hong's comprehensive moral taxonomy through thirty-odd character archetypes, blending Confucian virtues like loyalty and filial piety with Daoist ideals of natural spontaneity.)

順人也臨凝結而能斷操繩墨而無私者幹 人也拔朱紫於中搆剖猶豫以允當者理人 也步七曜之盈縮推興亡之道度者術人也 赴白刃而忘生格兕虎於林谷者勇人也整 威容以肅衆仗法度而無二者嚴人也創機 功以濟用緫音數而並精者藝人也淩强禦 而無憚雖嶮逼而不沮者黠人也執匪懈於 夙夜忘勞瘁於深峻者勤人也蒙謗讟而晏 如不慴懼於可畏者勁人也聞榮譽而不歡 遭憂難而不變者審人也知事可而必行不 猶豫於群疑者果人也循繩墨以進止不乾 没於僥倖者謹人也奉禮度以戰兢及親踈 而無尤者良人也履道素而無欲時雖移而 不變者朴人也凡此諸行了無一然而不躋 善人之迹者下人也門人請曰善人之行既 聞其目矣惡者之事可以戒俗者願文垂誥 焉抱朴子曰不致養於所生損道而危身者 悖人也懷邪僞以偷榮豫利己而忘生者逆 人也背仁義之正塗苟危人以自安者凶人 也好爭奪而無厭專醜正而害直者惡人也 出繩墨以傷刻心好殺而安忍者虐人也飾 邪說以浸潤構謗累於忠貞者讒人也雖言 巧而行違實履濁而假清者佞人也不原本 於枉直苟尚勝而肆怒者暴人也措細善以 取信隂挾毒而無親者姦人也承風指以苟 容揆主意而扶非者諂人也言不計於反覆
Interpretation

This passage describes various types of individuals and their moral characteristics, clearly distinguishing between virtuous and wicked people.

First, it enumerates ten manifestations of virtuous individuals: those who are upright and selfless (干人), those who can discern right from wrong (理人), those versed in astronomy and calendrics (术人), the courageous and fearless (勇人), the dignified and impartial (严人), masters of their craft (艺人), those who defy oppressive authority (黠人), the diligent and tireless (勤人), the steadfast and unyielding (劲人), those unmoved by praise or blame (审人), the resolute and decisive (果人), the cautious and rule-abiding (谨人), the courteous and refined (良人), and the simple and unpretentious (朴人). These traits all characterize virtuous individuals.

Next, it lists ten manifestations of wicked people: those who are unfilial to their parents (悖人), the hypocritical and selfish (逆人), those who abandon benevolence and righteousness (凶人), the greedy and belligerent (恶人), the cruel and tyrannical (虐人), slanderers of the loyal and virtuous (谗人), those who speak one way but act another (佞人), the violently temperamental (暴人), those outwardly kind but inwardly malicious (奸人), and the sycophantic and flattering (谄人). These behaviors all mark wicked individuals.

Finally, it points out that those who break their word and are inconsistent in their actions also demonstrate immoral conduct. Through contrasting the behavioral traits of virtuous and wicked people, the entire passage provides clear moral standards and practical guidance for conduct in the world.

好輕諾而無實者虚人也覩利地而亡義弃 廉恥以苟得者貪人也覿艷逸而心蕩飾誇 綺而思邪者淫人也見成事而疑惑動失計 而多悔者闇人也背訓典而自任恥請問於 勝己者損人也知善事而不逮雖多爲而無 成者劣人也委德行而不修奉權勢以取媚 者弊人也履蹊徑以僥速推貨賄以爭津者 邪人也既傲狼以無禮好淩辱乎勝己者悍 人也被抑枉而自誣事無苦而振懾者怯人 也治細辯於稠衆非其人而盡言者淺人也 闇事宜之可否雖企慕而不及者頑人也知 事非而不改聞良規而增劇者惑人也無濟 恤之仁心輕告絶於親舊者薄人也既疾其 所不逮喜他人之有災者妬人也專財穀而 輕義觀困匱而不振者吝人也冒至危以僥 幸值禍敗而不悔者愚人也情局碎而偏黨 志唯務於盈利者小人也騁鷹犬於原獸好 博戲而無已者迷人也忘等威之異數快飾 玩之誇麗者奢人也耽聲色與飲讌廢慶弔 於人理者荒人也既無心於脩尚又怠惰於 家業者嬾人也無抑斷之威儀每脫易而不 思者輕人也觀道義而如醉聞貨殖而波擾 者穢人也杖淺短而多謬闇趨舍之臧否者 笨(步本/切)人也憎賢者而不貴聞高言而如聾 者嚚人也覩朱紫而不分雖提耳而不悟者 蔽人也違道義以趑趄冒禮刑而罔顧者亂
Interpretation

This passage comes from Ge Hong's Baopuzi Outer Chapters, which enumerates twenty-four types of people with undesirable character traits. The author uses concise language to depict various personality flaws, which we can understand as follows:

Those who make promises lightly but never fulfill them are hypocrites; those who forget righteousness at the sight of profit and abandon integrity to grasp for gain are the greedy; those whose hearts flutter at beauty and deliberately adorn themselves to seduce others are the licentious.

Those who hesitate in decision-making and always regret afterward are the confused; those who disregard classical teachings, act self-righteously, and refuse to seek wisdom from sages are the self-serving; those who know what is right but fail to act, busy yet achieving nothing, are the incompetent.

Those who abandon moral cultivation and fawn over the powerful are the base; those who take crooked shortcuts and bribe for profit are the treacherous; those who are arrogant, rude, and bully those stronger than themselves are the violent.

Those who falsely accuse themselves when wronged and panic at minor troubles are the cowardly; those who show off their eloquence in public and bare their hearts to the wrong people are the shallow; those who cannot discern what should be done and, though admiring virtue, never learn, are the obstinate.

Those who know their faults but refuse to correct them, and even worsen upon hearing good advice, are the foolish; those who lack compassion and easily sever ties with family and friends are the cold-hearted; those who envy others' strengths and gloat over misfortunes are the jealous.

Those who value wealth over righteousness and refuse to help those in need are the stingy; those who take reckless risks and remain unenlightened even after disaster are the senseless; those who are narrow-minded, biased, and solely self-interested are the petty.

Those who indulge in hunting and gambling beyond redemption are the lost; those who forget their station and chase extravagance are the wasteful; those who drown in sensual pleasures and neglect human relationships are the dissolute.

Those who neither pursue self-cultivation nor bother to manage their households are the lazy; those who lack dignity and act rashly without forethought are the frivolous; those who grow weary at talk of virtue but light up at discussions of profit are the vulgar.

Those whose shallow knowledge is riddled with errors and who cannot discern what to accept or reject are the ignorant; those who resent talent and wisdom and feign deafness to profound discourse are the stubborn; those who cannot distinguish right from wrong and remain unenlightened despite reminders are the deluded.

Those who violate righteousness yet waver, and flout ritual propriety without restraint, are the disruptive. These vivid descriptions reveal the many weaknesses in human nature and remain cautionary even today.

人也每動作而受嗤言發口而違理者拙人 也事酋豪如僕虜值衰微而背惠者慝人也 損貧賤之故舊輕人士而踞傲者驕人也弃 衰色而廣欲非宦學而遠遊者蕩人也無忠 信之純固背恩養而趨利者叛人也當交顔 而面從至析離而背毁者僞人也習强梁而 專己距忠告而不納者刺人也抱朴子曰人 技未易知眞僞或相似士有顔貌脩麗風表 閑雅望之溢目接之適意威儀如龍虎盤旋 成規矩然心蔽神否才無所堪心中所有盡 附皮膚口不能吐片竒筆不能屬半句入不 能宰民出不能用兵治事則事廢銜命則辱 命動靜無宜出處莫可蓋難分之一也士有 貌望樸悴容觀矬陋聲氣雌弱進止質澀然 而含英懷寳經明行高幹過元凱文蔚春林 官則庶績康用武則克全獨勝蓋難分之二 也士有謀猷淵邃術略入神智周成則思洞 幽玄才兼能事神器無宜而口不傳心筆不 盡意造次之接不異凡庸蓋難分之三也士 有機辯清銳巧言綺粲擥引譬喻淵湧風厲 然而口之所談身不能行長於識古短於理 今爲政政亂牧民民怨蓋難分之四也士有 外形足恭容虔言恪而神疏心慢中懷散放 受任不憂居局不冶蓋難分之五也士有控 弦命中空拳入白倒乘立騎五兵畢習而體 輕慮淺手勦心怯虚試無對而實用無驗望
Interpretation

The Outer Chapters of the Master Who Embraces Simplicity (Baopuzi Waipian) analyzes five types of people whose outward appearances contradict their inner qualities, reminding us that judging others should never rely solely on superficial impressions:

The first type is those who appear refined but lack true substance. Such individuals may look dignified and imposing, carrying themselves with the majestic bearing of dragons and tigers, their actions seemingly conforming to proper standards. Yet their minds are hollow—they possess neither administrative competence nor military leadership. Any task entrusted to them will be bungled, and any diplomatic mission assigned will end in disgrace. Such people are fundamentally incapable of shouldering important responsibilities.

The second type is those with plain appearances but extraordinary talent. They may have ugly features, weak voices, and clumsy manners, yet harbor genuine ability within. Well-versed in the classics and of noble character, their capabilities surpass even ancient worthies (the "Eight Exemplars" [Yuan-Kai] of antiquity). In governance, they can make all endeavors flourish; in warfare, they achieve complete victory. Such individuals are easily overlooked due to their unremarkable exteriors.

The third type is the profoundly wise who conceal their brilliance. Their strategies run deep, their wisdom transcends the ordinary, and their insights penetrate hidden subtleties—they possess multifaceted talents. Yet they seldom voice their thoughts, and even their writings cannot fully convey their minds. In casual encounters, they appear no different from common people.

The fourth type is those skilled in rhetoric but inept in practice. Eloquent in debate and lavish with ornate phrases, they adeptly quote classics, their speech flowing like the wind. Yet they cannot practice what they preach—adept at discussing ancient figures but incapable of handling contemporary affairs. Entrust them with governance, and chaos ensues; put them in charge of people, and resentment follows.

The fifth type is those outwardly reverent but inwardly negligent. Their manners show humility and propriety, their speech seems measured, yet their spirit is indolent and their minds scattered. They approach assigned tasks without diligence and fulfill official duties without responsibility.

The text also mentions another kind: those proficient in martial arts (the "Five Weapons" [Wubing]), capable of hitting targets at a hundred paces, disarming opponents barehanded, and excelling in mounted archery—yet whose actual temperament proves frivolous and courage deficient. Though impressive in practice, they become utterly useless when martial skills are truly needed.

塵奔北聞敵失魄蓋難分之六也士有梗槩 簡緩言希貌樸細行闕漏不爲小勇跼蹐拘 檢犯而不校握抓垂翅名爲弱願然而膽勁 心方不畏强禦義正所在視死猶歸支解寸 斷不易所守蓋難分之七也士有孝友温淑 恂恂平雅履信思順非禮不蹈安困潔志操 清冰霜而疏遲迂闊不達事要見機不作所 爲無成居己梁倡受任不舉難分之八也士 有行己高簡風格峻峭嘯傲偃蹇淩儕慢俗 不肅檢括不護小失適情率意旁若無人朋 黨排譴談者同敗士友不附品藻所遺而立 朝正色知無不爲忠於奉上明於攝下蓋難 分之九也士有含弘曠濟虚己受物藏疾匿 瑕温恭廉潔勞謙沖退救危全信寄命不疑 託孤可保而純良暗權仁而不斷善不能賞 惡不忍罰忠貞有餘而幹用不足操柯猶豫 廢法效非枉直混錯終於負敗蓋難分之十 也夫物有似而實非若然而不然料之無惑 望形得神聖者其將病諸况乎常人故用才 取士推昵結友不可以不精擇不可以不詳 試也若乃性行之惑變始正而終邪若王莽 初則美於伊霍晚則劇於趙高又非中才所 能逆盡也若令士之易别如鷦鷯之與鴻鵠 狐兔之與龍驎者則四凶不得官於堯朝管 蔡不得幾危宗周仲尼無澹臺之失延陵無 捐金之恨伊尹無七十之勞項羽無嫌范之
Interpretation

This passage describes ten types of individuals whose true nature is difficult to discern, emphasizing the importance of accurate judgment in recognizing and employing talent.

The first type appears timid yet possesses inner fortitude. Outwardly gentle and cautious, they endure slights without resentment. Yet when confronted with matters of principle, they stand firm for righteousness, facing death without fear.

The second type upholds virtue but lacks worldly acumen. Filial, fraternal, courteous and trustworthy, they strictly observe propriety and endure poverty contentedly. However, their excessive attention to minor details and indecisiveness often causes them to miss crucial opportunities.

The third type displays eccentricity but unwavering loyalty. Proud and unconventional, they act spontaneously and often offend others. Yet when serving in office, they administer affairs impartially, demonstrating loyalty to superiors and fairness to subordinates.

The fourth type exhibits magnanimity but indecision. Broad-minded and courteous, they willingly assist others and can be entrusted with important matters. However, their inability to make firm decisions and unclear standards for rewards and punishments frequently lead to failure through hesitation.

The author cautions that evaluating people requires utmost care. Some individuals appear similar yet differ fundamentally, like Wang Mang who initially seemed as virtuous as Yi Yin or Huo Guang, but later proved more tyrannical than Zhao Gao. If talent could be distinguished as easily as small birds from wild geese, or foxes from dragon-steeds, history would not record the chaos caused by the Four Villains or the rebellions of Guan and Cai. Confucius would not have misjudged Tantai Mieming, nor would Xiang Yu have doubted Fan Zeng.

The text underscores that both selecting talent and forming friendships demand careful observation and testing, for human character can change. Superficial appearances and temporary behavior often prove unreliable indicators of true nature.

悔矣所患於其如碔砆(上音武/下音夫)之亂瑾瑜鷦 螟之似鳳凰凝冰之類水精烟熏之凝雲氣 故令不謬者尟也惟帝難之矧乎近人哉夫 唯大明玄鑒幽微靈銓揣物思灼沉昧瞻山 識璞臨川知珠士於難分之中而無取舍之 恨者使臧否區分抑揚咸允武丁姬文不獨 治而傅說吕尚不永弃高莽宰嚭不得成其 惡弘恭石顯無所容其僞矣斯蓋取士之較 略選擇之大都耳精微之求存乎其人固非 毫翰之所備縷也 抱朴子外篇卷之二
Interpretation

This passage discusses the difficulty in distinguishing genuine talent from its counterfeit. Just as inferior stones resembling jade (wufu) can be confused with true precious jade, small birds (jiao ming) may appear like phoenixes, frozen water can be mistaken for crystal quartz, and soot stains may resemble ethereal clouds, truly discerning individuals are exceedingly rare in this world. Even the sagely emperors of antiquity found this challenging, let alone ordinary people.

Only those possessing extraordinary wisdom and the ability to perceive subtle mysteries can achieve this discernment—like using a celestial balance to weigh objects or illuminating darkness with brilliant light. They can identify uncarved jade within mountains and recognize pearls hidden beneath water's surface. True sages in ambiguous circumstances maintain impartial judgment unaffected by personal biases, thereby clearly distinguishing good from evil and delivering fair praise or criticism.

Historically, exemplary rulers like Wu Ding of Shang and Ji Wen (King Wen of Zhou) achieved good governance precisely because they employed virtuous ministers like Fu Yue and Lü Shang. Conversely, villains like Zai Pi of Wu failed to fully succeed, and the deceitful facades of figures like Hong Gong and Shi Xian of Han were ultimately exposed—all due to the rulers' capacity for such discernment.

Ultimately, the key to selecting talent lies in mastering the fundamental principle of distinguishing authenticity, while the subtle art of discernment depends on the selector's own cultivation. This profound knowledge cannot be fully conveyed through mere words on paper.

十二

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5f0021); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 21 Vol. 23 →