中文 · EN

《弘道錄》Vol. 12

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Xu Daozang 續道藏 Vol. 12 / 41 7,203 characters

About this page. The original text of 《弘道錄》 Vol. 12 (Xu Daozang 續道藏, 41 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 15 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《弘道錄》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

弘道録卷之十九羅四  義   父子之義 西漢書文帝時賈誼上疏夏殷周爲天子皆 數十世秦爲天子二世而亡人性不甚相遠 也何三代之君有道之長而秦無道之暴也 占之王者太子乃生固舉以禮有司齊肅端 冕見之南郊過闕則下過廟則趨故自爲赤 子而教以行矣孩提有識三公三少固明孝 仁義禮以道習之逐去邪人不使見惡行於 是皆選天下之端士孝悌愽文有道術者以 衛翼之使與太子居處出入故太子乃生聞 正言行正道左右前後皆正人也夫三代之 所以長久者以其輔翼太子有此具也及秦 則不然使趙高傅胡亥而教之獄所習者非 斬劓人則夷人之三族也故胡亥今日即位 而明日射人忠諫者謂之誹謗深計者謂之 妖言其視殺人若艾草菅豈惟胡亥性惡哉 彼其所以道之者非其理故也  録曰誼之疏可謂深明其未然矣夫古者  天子之元子衆子以至公卿大夫元士之  嫡子與凡民之俊秀皆入大學而教之以  窮理正心脩己治人之道及周之衰教化  陵夷道之廢也久矣不獨秦已然也以帝  之賢而不能用誼之說君子之所深惜也  故録以存之厥後景帝殺戮大臣變易太  子廢置主后驕寵愛弟幾乎不蹈秦之故  轍孰謂誼果少年之見乎哉 萬石君石奮歸老於家過宫門闕必下車趨
Interpretation

The Moral Duty between Father and Son

The Book of the Western Han records that in the reign of Emperor Wen, Jia Yi submitted a memorial stating that the rulers of the three dynasties of Xia, Shang, and Zhou were able to pass on the throne for dozens of generations, while the Qin, which held the throne, transmitted it for only two before collapsing. Human nature does not differ greatly from one person to another. Why, then, did the states of the three dynasties endure for so long when their rulers governed by the Dao, while the Qin fell so quickly when it governed without it?

In examining the ancient past, when a crown prince was born, the court carried out the rites in accordance with ceremony. The responsible officials straightened their robes and caps and welcomed the heir in the southern suburbs. They dismounted from their carriages when passing the palace gates and walked quickly when passing the ancestral temple. From infancy, the prince was instructed in ritual. When he came of age, the Three Dukes of the court and the Three Junior Mentors who attended him taught him filial piety, benevolence, righteousness, and propriety. They guided him to learn these principles through his everyday words and conduct, and they kept him away from depraved people and from improper behavior.

The court also chose from across the realm men of upright conduct, filial devotion, brotherly affection, broad learning, and moral integrity to tutor and protect the prince, and to live and move with him. In this way, from childhood the prince heard only proper speech, walked only the correct path, and found only upright people around him, in front and behind, on the left and on the right. The longevity of the three dynasties was due precisely to this system of instructing the heir.

The Qin was not like this. The Second Emperor, Hu Hai, had Zhao Gao as his tutor, and what he learned was the art of interrogation and punishment. What he was exposed to were either cruel tortures such as killing and cutting off noses, or punishments that exterminated three generations of a family. Thus, the day after Hu Hai ascended the throne, he shot down innocent people with arrows. Loyal remonstrances were condemned by him as slander, and far-sighted proposals were dismissed as monstrous talk. He regarded killing people as no different from cutting down weeds. Was Hu Hai's nature alone so vicious? It was also because those who guided him taught him wrongly.

The Records of Expanding the Dao (Hongdao Lu) comments: Jia Yi's memorial profoundly identifies the principle that must be given attention before problems arise. In antiquity, the eldest son of the Son of Heaven, the other sons, the sons of the dukes, ministers, and officers, and the outstanding young men among the common people all entered the Grand Academy to study. There they received instruction in investigating principles thoroughly, rectifying the heart, cultivating the self, and governing others. When the Zhou declined and its teachings gradually waned, the transmission of the Dao (Dao tong) had long been neglected, and this condition was not confined to the Qin alone.

A ruler as wise as Emperor Wen did not adopt Jia Yi's proposal, and this is a matter over which the gentleman deeply laments. For that reason, it has been deliberately recorded here to preserve this principle. Later, Emperor Jing executed ministers, changed the choice of heir, deposed an empress, and indulged his younger brother excessively, nearly repeating the failure of the Qin. Who can say that Jia Yi's insight was merely the shallow view of a young man?

When Shi Fen, the Lord of Wanshi, retired and returned home, every time he passed the palace gates and the watchtowers, he was certain to dismount and walk quickly.

見路馬必軾焉子孫爲小吏來𡚖謁萬石君 必朝服見之不名有過失不誚讓爲便坐對 案不食然後諸子相責因長老肉袒固謝改 之乃許子孫勝冠者在側雖燕必冠申申如 也僮僕訢訢如也唯謹上時賜食於家必稽 首俯伏而食如在上前其執䘮哀戚甚子孫 遵教亦如之萬石君家以孝謹聞乎郡國雖 齊魯諸儒質行皆自以爲不及也長子建爲 郎中令少子慶爲内史建老白首萬石君尚 無恙每五日洗沐歸謁親入子舍竊問侍者 取親中裙厠牏身自浣滌復與侍者不敢令 萬石君知之以爲常内史慶醉歸入外門不 下車萬石君聞之不食慶恐肉袒謝罪不許 舉宗及兄建肉袒萬石君讓曰内使貴人入 閭里里中長老皆走匿而内史坐車中自如 固當乃謝罷慶及諸子入里門趍至家  録曰愚觀秦漢之際刑家之梏而乃有石  氏之禮法可以見人心之天矣使若人者  以傳太子以訓諸侯王若伯禽抗世子之  法則漢世之俗庶幾有瘳乎奈之何徒見  躬行之不費而不知非由清靜玄妙之虚  文徒厭儒術之紛華而不知本乃性分固  有之實用乃以建爲郎中令慶爲内史則  給事之官錢穀之職其於國家之益能幾  何哉誼之痛哭良有以也録之 金日磾本匈奴休屠王太子也母閼氏教誨 其子甚有法度日磾奉母進孝道武帝聞而
Interpretation

When Shi Fen saw the carriage of the ruler passing, he would always grip the front crossbar in a gesture of respect. When his descendants who held minor office came to pay their respects to him, known as Wanshi Jun (the "Lord of Ten Thousand Stones," an honorific that reflected the fact that all four of his sons had risen to the rank of two thousand bushels), they were required to wear court robes, and he never addressed them by their personal names. If a descendant committed a fault, he did not reprimand them to their face. Instead, he withdrew to the bianzuo (the resting place beside the formal seat) to attend to his affairs and would refuse to eat. Afterward, his sons would reproach one another, then bare their upper bodies, ask the elder to accept their solemn apology, and pledge to mend their ways. Only then would he consent to forgive them.

Those among his descendants who had reached adulthood, even when at home in idleness, always wore their caps and maintained a dignified bearing. The household servants were likewise reverent and careful. When the emperor occasionally sent food to the house, Shi Fen would kowtow and prostrate himself, eating as though he were in the emperor's presence. When he mourned his kin, his grief was profound, and his descendants followed his teaching and did the same. The household of Wanshi Jun became renowned throughout the commanderies and kingdoms for filial piety and caution. Even the Confucian scholars of Qi and Lu believed that their own conduct fell short of theirs.

The eldest son, Shi Jian, served as Langzhongling (Minister of the Palace Guards, an office in charge of palace security and related affairs), and the youngest son, Shi Qing, served as Neishi (an official in charge of administration in the capital region). When Shi Jian had grown old and his hair had turned white, Wanshi Jun was still alive. Shi Jian returned home every five days, on his rest day, to visit his father. He would enter his son's quarters, quietly inquire of the attendants, and take his father's undergarments and inner clothing. He washed these himself and then handed them back to the attendants. He did not dare let Wanshi Jun know, and he continued this practice for many years.

Once, the Neishi Shi Qing returned home drunk. He entered the outer gate but did not dismount from his carriage. When Wanshi Jun heard of this, he was so angered that he refused to eat. Shi Qing, frightened, bared his upper body to apologize, but Wanshi Jun would not accept it. The entire household, along with the elder brother Shi Jian, also bared their upper bodies. Wanshi Jun rebuked him, saying: "The Neishi is a person of high rank. When he enters the lanes of the neighborhood, the elders of the lane must step aside for him. Yet you sat in your carriage as though nothing were amiss, and this was simply not proper." Shi Qing apologized again, and only then did Wanshi Jun allow him to leave. From that time on, whenever Shi Qing and his brothers entered the village gate, they hurried on foot to their homes.

The commentary in the Hongdao Lu (Record of Expanding the Way) observes: I find that, in the age between the Qin and Han, when harsh punishments and strict laws constrained the hearts of the people, a family like the Shis nonetheless upheld ritual propriety. This is enough to show that human hearts naturally incline toward goodness. Had such men been entrusted to assist the heir apparent and instruct the feudal kings, and had they upheld the rites of the heir as Boqin did, the customs of the Han might have been improved. It is regrettable that the people of that time saw only that practicing ritual through personal conduct required little effort, and did not realize that this was not empty talk about pure and mysterious principles, but the practical functioning already inherent in human nature. They rejected only the complicated and ornate aspects of Confucian learning and did not understand its foundation. As for Shi Jian serving as Langzhongling and Shi Qing as Neishi, these posts merely managed palace affairs and the revenues of grain and money. How much could they truly benefit the state? Jia Yi's heartfelt and urgent memorials of remonstrance were indeed well founded. Therefore, I record this matter here.

Jin Midi was originally the crown prince of the Xiongnu's Xiutu King. His mother, the yanzhi (the title for the consort of a Xiongnu king), instructed her son with great discipline. When Emperor Wu of Han heard that Jin Midi was devoted to his mother, ……

嘉之詔圖其像於甘泉宫日磾每過見畫像 常拜泣然後去及日磾長子爲武帝弄兒其 後壯大自殿下與宫人戯日磾適見遂殺之 上怒日磾具言所以上爲之泣而心敬日磾  録曰以愚觀於日磾之事乃知夷狄之有  親不如諸夏之亡也夫成季之勲宣孟之  忠而不祀者原同平括之淫乎莊姬也康  叔之裔祀融之墟而盡滅者公子頑之通  乎君母也矧於殿廷何地宫人何人可與  之狎而若罔聞乎磾與光均之不學者也  豈其光之無術而磾之有識哉斷與不斷  忍與不忍而已矣故曰當斷不斷反受其  亂又云小不忍則亂大謀斯言也可以不  學而識 韋賢與子玄成俱以明經歷位丞相故鄒魯 之間曰遺子黄金不如一經賢爲人質朴少 欲篤志於學號稱大儒徵爲博士詔授帝詩 故宣帝之時甚見尊重本始三年爲丞相封 扶陽侯在位五歲以老病乞骸骨𡚖丞相致 仕自賢始玄成尤謙遜下士兄弘爲太常丞 當嗣及賢病篤家以玄成上有詔引拜玄成 辭避不得已受爵宣帝高其節以爲河南太 守弘東海太守初帝寵姬張婕好男淮陽憲 王好政事通法律上奇其才有意欲以爲嗣 然因太子起於細㣲又早失母故不忍也久 之上欲感風憲王輔以禮讓之臣乃拜玄成 爲淮陽中尉及元帝即位十年之間遂繼父 相位封侯故國榮當世焉
Interpretation

Emperor Wu of Han (Han Wudi) praised Jin Midi (Jin Midi) for his loyalty and diligence and ordered that his portrait be painted in the Ganquan Palace (Ganquan Gong), a Han imperial palace complex. Each time Jin Midi passed the portrait, he would bow respectfully and weep before going on his way.

Later, Jin Midi's eldest son became a companion of the emperor. Once grown, he began to frolic with palace maids in the hall. Jin Midi happened to come upon them and killed his son. The emperor was furious, but Jin Midi explained in detail why he had done it. Upon hearing this, the emperor wept, yet his respect for Jin Midi only grew.

The Hongdao Lu (Hongdao Lu) comments: In my view, the case of Jin Midi shows that even when the Yidi (the term ancient people used for peoples beyond the Central Plains) have bonds of kinship, they fall short of those within the Huaxia (the ancient name for the Central Plains region) who have given up their own kin. Ji You had merit and Zhao Xuanzi was loyal, yet their sacrificial lineages were cut off because Yuantong and Pingkuo had affairs with Lady Zhuang. Kang Shu's descendants kept their sacrifices, yet the whole clan was destroyed because Prince Wan had an affair with the lady mother. Moreover, what kind of place is the palace, and who are palace maids? How could one dally intimately with them and then act as though nothing had happened? Jin Midi and Huo Guang had little formal education. Was it that Huo Guang lacked ability while Jin Midi had insight? The key lies only in whether one can decide when a decision is needed, and whether one can hold back when restraint is needed. Thus the ancient saying goes: "Failing to decide when one should decide brings disorder." And again: "Failing to endure small matters ruins great plans." Even without study, these truths can be understood from the events themselves.

Wei Xian and his son Wei Xuancheng both held high office as chancellors because they were masters of the Jing (classics). For this reason, a saying circulated in the Zou and Lu regions: "Leaving sons gold is not as good as leaving them a copy of the classics." Wei Xian was plain and unassuming, had few desires, and devoted himself wholeheartedly to scholarship, earning the title of great Confucian scholar. He was summoned as an erudite (boshi) and, by imperial order, lectured the emperor on the Shijing (Book of Odes), which is why he was held in high regard under Emperor Xuan. In the third year of the Benshi era, he became chancellor and was enfeoffed as Marquis of Fuyang. After five years in the post, he asked to retire because of old age and frequent illness. The emperor allowed him to resign the chancellorship and return home, and this practice began with Wei Xian.

Wei Xuancheng was especially humble and generous toward others. His elder brother, Wei Hong, served as assistant grand ritualist and should have inherited the title. When Wei Xian fell gravely ill, however, the family recommended Wei Xuancheng instead. When the emperor summoned him to confer an office, Wei Xuancheng declined again and again and accepted the title only when he had no choice. Emperor Xuan admired his integrity and appointed him Governor of Henan, while Wei Hong was made Governor of Donghai.

Earlier, the emperor's favored consort, Lady Zhang, bore Prince Xian of Huaiyang. The prince loved governance and understood the law well, and the emperor so valued his ability that he once considered naming him heir. But the crown prince came from a humble background and had lost his mother at an early age, so the emperor could not bear to change the succession. After a long time, the emperor wished to have a minister known for deference assist Prince Xian, and so he appointed Wei Xuancheng as Chamberlain of Huaiyang. In the ten years after Emperor Yuan came to the throne, Wei Xuancheng succeeded his father as chancellor and was also enfeoffed as a marquis. In this way, the Wei family became prominent in their age.

 録曰漢世以經術居相位自公孫而後韋  氏父子而已賢耄老當柄居位五年得遂  乞骸其時以爲美談况望有所建白耶玄  成在位七年守正持重不及其父而文采  過之夫以家相之任上位天地下育萬物  如以文而已矣乃學士之選也此所以終  漢之世相業無聞非逡巡自保則因循故  事無惑乎治道之止於斯也 史記太史公司馬談仕於建元元封之間愍 學者之不逹而師悖乃論六家之要指曰陰 陽儒墨名法道德太史公掌天官不治民有 子曰遷生於龍門耕牧河山之陽十歲誦古 文二十而南遊江淮上會稽探禹穴闚九疑 浮於沅湘北涉汶泗講業齊魯之都觀孔子 之遺風過梁楚以𡚖於是遷仕爲郎中奉使 西征巴蜀以南還報命是歲天子始建漢家 之封而太史公留滯周南不得與從事故發 憤且卒而子遷適使反見父於河洛之間太 史公遷手而泣曰余先周室之太史也自上 世嘗顯功名於虞夏典天官事後世中衰今 天子接千歲之統封泰山而予不得從行是 命也夫予死汝必爲太史爲太史無忘吾所 欲論著矣夫天下稱誦周公言其能論歌文 武之德宣周邵之風達太王王季之思慮爰 及公劉以尊后稷也幽厲之後王道闕禮樂 衰孔子脩春秋學者至今則之自獲麟以來 四百餘歲諸侯相兼史記放絶今漢興海内
Interpretation

The records say that among the Han scholars who rose to the chancellorship through the classics, only the Wei father and son came after Gongsun Hong. When Wei Xian was old, he held the chancellorship for five years and was then permitted to retire, and his contemporaries regarded this as a fine story. Given that, what counsel or accomplishment could one still expect from him? Wei Xuancheng served for seven years. He was upright and prudent, though not as capable as his father, and he was more accomplished in literary matters.

The chancellor's duty was to assist the Dao (the Way) of heaven and earth above and to nourish the myriad things below. If one valued only literary talent, that would be no more than the standard for selecting scholars. The Han never produced a chancellor whose governance deserves praise. They were either cautious and yielding, seeking only to preserve themselves, or they simply followed old precedent. That the Han way of governing stopped at this point is no cause for wonder.

The Shiji records that the Grand Historian Sima Tan served during the Jianyuan and Yuanfeng reign periods. Worried that scholars could not master learning thoroughly, and that the various schools, each following its own teachers, contradicted one another, he set out the essentials of six traditions: the Yin-Yang school, the Confucians, the Mohists, the School of Names, the Legalists, and the Daojia (Daoist school). The Grand Historian oversaw the celestial offices and did not govern the common people.

His son, named Qian, was born at Longmen. He farmed and herded on the south side of the river mountains. At ten he was reading ancient texts. At twenty he began traveling south through the Yangtze and Huai regions, climbed Mount Kuaiji to visit the Cave of Yu, surveyed Mount Jiuyi, and sailed the Yuan and Xiang rivers. He then went north, crossed the Wen and Si rivers, studied in the regions of Qi and Lu, and examined the customs Confucius had left behind. After passing through Liang and Chu, he returned home.

Later, Sima Qian became a Gentleman of the Palace and was sent on a mission south of Ba and Shu, returning to report. That year the Son of Heaven began the great Feng and Shan sacrifices for the Han dynasty. The Grand Historian, however, was detained in Zhounan and could not accompany the ceremony. Indignant and gravely ill, he was close to death. Sima Qian happened to return from his mission and met his father at Heluo. The Grand Historian took his hand and wept, saying: "Our ancestors served as Grand Historians of Zhou. From high antiquity our family distinguished itself under Yu and Xia, presiding over the celestial offices, but later our house declined. Now the sovereign inherits a line a thousand years old and goes to Mount Tai to perform the Feng sacrifice, while I cannot follow. Perhaps this is fate! After I die, you must become Grand Historian. When you are Grand Historian, do not forget what I wished to set out and write."

All under heaven praised the Duke of Zhou, saying that he could expound and sing the virtues of King Wen and King Wu, proclaim the legacy of the Dukes of Zhou and Shao, clarify the deliberations of King Tai and King Ji, and trace back to Gong Liu in order to honor Hou Ji. After the reigns of King You and King Li, the royal Way declined and ritual and music decayed. Confucius revised the Spring and Autumn Annals, which scholars still take as their standard today. Since the capture of the qilin recorded in the Annals, more than four hundred years have passed. The feudal lords annexed one another, and the transmission of historical records was cut off. Now the Han has risen, and across the empire...

一統明主賢君忠臣死義之士予爲太史而 弗論載廢天下之文予甚懼焉汝其念哉遷 俯首流涕曰小子不敏請悉論先人所次舊 聞弗敢闕卒三歲而遷爲太史令紬史記石 室金匱之書不墮先人所言所謂述故事整 齊其世傳非所謂作也於是論次其文七年 而遭李陵之禍退而深惟詩書隱約欲遂其 志思昔西伯拘羑里演周易孔子厄陳蔡作 春秋屈原放逐著離騷左丘失明厥有國語 孫子臏脚而論兵法不韋遷蜀世傳吕覽韓 非囚秦說難孤憤詩三百篇大抵賢聖發憤 之所爲作也故述徃事思來者卒術陶唐以 來至於麟止自黄帝始著十二本紀十表八 書三十世家七十列傳凡百三十篇藏之名 山副在京師以俟後世聖人君子  録曰按遷自叙曰漢繼五帝末流接三代  統業秦滅古文明堂金匱石室玉板圖籍  散亂漢興更萧何韓信張蒼叔孫通百年  之間彬彬文學稍進詩書徃徃間出矣時  天下遺文古事靡不畢集太史公太史公  相續纂其職夫固有所受也然猶憤發於  黨禍而成百三十篇之書矧於後學而敢  面墻乎哉及班氏繼作盡用其文至後杜  預通典鄭樵通志馬端臨通考詔許於三  館惜書尚書給筆札繕寫而温公通鑑文  公綱目胡安國春秋傳學徒暨乃子厥婿  皆同纂校嗚呼何其盛哉今或志可勉而
Interpretation

"After the empire was unified, if I, as Grand Historian (Taishi, the official in charge of astronomy, the calendar, and the historical records), did not record the wise rulers, the virtuous ministers, and those who died for righteousness, the written documents of the realm would be cut off, and I am deeply troubled by this. You must remember this matter."

Sima Qian heard this, lowered his head, and wept. He said, "My talent is slight, but I am willing to do my utmost to put in order the old accounts my late father arranged, and I dare not omit anything." Three years later, Sima Qian became Grand Scribe (Taishiling) and organized the historical materials kept in the Stone Chamber and the Golden Casket. He did not go against his father's words. The phrase "transmit old accounts and put in order what has been handed down through the generations" means arranging and sequencing the historical events that had been passed down over the ages. It did not mean creating something from nothing.

Sima Qian then began to compile these documents. Seven years later, he suffered the calamity involving Li Ling. After he withdrew from office, he reflected deeply: the wording of the ancient classics is often subtle and winding, and I wish to fulfill my aspirations. He recalled that when the Earl of the West was imprisoned at Youli, he deduced the Book of Changes; that Confucius, trapped between the states of Chen and Cai, compiled the Spring and Autumn Annals; that Qu Yuan, exiled, wrote the Li Sao; that Zuo Qiuming, after losing his sight, composed the Guoyu; that Sun Bin, after suffering the removal of his kneecaps, expounded on the art of war; and that Lü Buwei, relocated to Shu, left behind the Lüshi Chunqiu, which has been transmitted to later ages. Han Fei, imprisoned in Qin, wrote "Shuo Nan" and "Gu Fen." Broadly speaking, most of the three hundred poems in the Book of Odes were also written by worthies and sages to give voice to their pent-up grief.

Therefore, I record past events in the hope of being understood by later generations. The work runs from the time of Tao Tang (Yao) to the capture of the unicorn, beginning with the Yellow Emperor. It consists of twelve Basic Annals, ten Tables, eight Treatises, thirty Hereditary Houses, and seventy Biographies, for a total of one hundred and thirty chapters. I keep the original copy hidden in famous mountains and deposit a duplicate in the capital, to await the sages and gentlemen of later ages.

The editorial note in the Hongdao Lu observes that, in his postface, Sima Qian mentions that the Han dynasty inherited the remnants of the late Five Emperors and continued the lineage of the Three Dynasties of Xia, Shang, and Zhou. After the fall of Qin, the ancient documents and classics were scattered and fragmented. When the Han rose, Xiao He, Han Xin, Zhang Cang, Shusun Tong, and others successively put governance and cultural education in order. After a century of development, learning gradually flourished, and ancient texts such as the Odes and the Documents repeatedly came to light. The surviving documents and historical records of the empire were almost entirely gathered together. Sima Tan and Sima Qian, father and son, successively held the office of Grand Scribe and compiled histories, which rested on a foundation transmitted by their predecessors. Yet Sima Qian, implicated in the Li Ling affair, still wrote his one hundred and thirty chapters out of indignation. How, then, could later scholars willingly remain ignorant and refuse to study with dedication?

Ban Gu went on to write the Book of Han, drawing extensively on Sima Qian's wording. Afterward, Du You compiled the Tongdian, Zheng Qiao the Tongzhi, and Ma Duanlin the Wenxian Tongkao. The court also permitted them to borrow books from the Three Scriptoria (the institutions where the court kept its collections and compiled histories) and supplied paper and brushes for copying. When Sima Guang compiled the Zizhi Tongjian, Zhu Xi the Tongjian Gangmu, and Hu Anguo wrote the Chunqiu Zhuan, their disciples, and even their sons and sons-in-law, took part in the compiling and proofreading. Alas, how flourishing scholarship was! Now, some people may resolve to study diligently……

 力之所建已不能勉才可强而書之所載  己不可强己可信而人之所好已不可信  則亦徒志而已君子不可徒羡古人之才  美又不可甘蹈今人之自畫於可勉而勉  之可備而備之可信而信之則亦庶幾乎  一家之冗說矣 劉向三子伋賜皆好學惟歆最知名父子俱 好古受詔領校祕書講論六藝傳記諸子詩 賦數術方技無所不究向卒歆復領五經終 父前業始皆治易宣帝時詔受榖梁春秋見 古文春秋左氏傳歆大好之初左傳多古字 古言學者訓故而已至是歆引傳文以解經 轉相發眀由是章句義理備焉復湛靖有謀 博見疆志過絶於人嘗以左丘明好惡與聖 人同親見夫子而公羊穀梁在七十子之列 傳聞之與親見之其詳畧不同數以難向向 不能非間也  録曰班固賛曰仲尼稱材難自後綴文之  士唯孟軻孫况董仲舒司馬遷劉向揚雄  此數公者皆博物洽聞通達古今其言有  補於世傳曰聖人不出其間必有命世者  焉劉氏鴻範論發眀大傳著天人之應七  略剖判藝文綜百家之緒三統歷譜考步  日月五星之度有意其推本之也嗚呼向  言山陵之戒於今察之哀哉指明梓柱以  推廢興昭矣豈非直諒多聞之益與觀固  所言與向前後所上封事忠精懇篤天胡  不祐之乎而卒以空言殆天所廢非人所
Interpretation

The strength of a single person can accomplish only what he can force himself to do, so if he cannot force himself to do something, he should consider whether his talent is equal to the task. Only what he can bear should he strive to do. As for the principles recorded in books, if he cannot force himself to practice them, he should consider whether they are credible. Only what is credible should he believe. If even what he is fond of is not credible, then his aspirations are empty. The gentleman should neither merely envy the talent and virtue of the ancients nor contentedly follow the boundaries that people of his own age have set for him. He should diligently do what he can do, prepare thoroughly for what he can prepare for, and believe in and practice what is credible. In this way, he may be spared the lengthy disputations found in the writings of a single school.

Liu Xiang's three sons, Ji, Ci, and Xin, all loved learning, and Liu Xin was the most famous of them. Father and son both loved the ancient texts. By imperial command they oversaw the collation of the books in the palace archives, lecturing on and discussing the Six Arts (the six Confucian classics), their commentaries, the masters of the various schools, poetry and rhapsody, numerology and techniques, and medicine and recipes, and they studied all of them thoroughly. After Liu Xiang died, Liu Xin took over the collation of the Five Classics and completed the work his father had left unfinished.

At first, Liu Xin and others all studied the Book of Changes (Yijing). During the reign of Emperor Xuan, the court issued an edict ordering the study of the Guliang Spring and Autumn (Chunqiu Guliang). Later, Liu Xin saw the Zuo Commentary on the Spring and Autumn (Chunqiu Zuoshi Zhuan), written in ancient script, and he greatly admired it. Originally, the Zuo Commentary contained many archaic characters and expressions, and scholars had only glossed them philologically. In Liu Xin's time, he cited the Zuo Commentary to explain the classic text, so that the two illuminated each other. From then on, the chapter divisions and the doctrinal meanings of the classics gradually became complete.

Liu Xin was calm and composed, resourceful, broadly knowledgeable, and resolute in his will, far surpassing ordinary people. He believed that Zuo Qiuming shared the same likes and dislikes as the sage and had personally seen Confucius, whereas the authors of the Gongyang and Guliang commentaries were listed among Confucius's seventy disciples. Between what one has seen with one's own eyes and what one has heard secondhand, the detail of the record naturally differs. Liu Xin repeatedly raised these points to challenge his father, and Liu Xiang, for a time, could not refute him.

Record: Ban Gu remarks in his eulogy that Confucius sighed that men of talent are rare. From then on, among the writers, only Mengke (Mencius), Sun Kuang (Xunzi), Dong Zhongshu, Sima Qian, Liu Xiang, and Yang Xiong were broadly learned and thoroughly versed in past and present, and their words were of benefit to the world. An ancient saying goes: "If the sage does not appear in the world, then there must arise one who receives Heaven's mandate and influences an age."

Liu Xiang's Discourse on the Hongfan elucidates the intent of the Hongfan Commentary and discusses the responsive connection between Heaven and humanity. His Seven Summaries classified and organized the books and gathered the lineages of the learning of the hundred schools. His Santong Calendar examined and calculated the degrees of the movements of the sun, moon, and five planets. His purpose lay in investigating the fundamentals of things. Alas! Liu Xiang's warnings concerning the imperial tombs have, as we now see, indeed been borne out, and this is lamentable. He pointed out the omen of the catalpa pillar and used it to judge the rise and fall of the state, and these judgments were already very clear. Is this not precisely the benefit that comes from uprightness, sincerity, and broad learning?

Looking at Ban Gu's words and then at the memorials Liu Xiang submitted before and after, one sees that he was loyal and sincere and that his words were earnest. Why did Heaven not protect him? In the end, he left behind only empty words. Perhaps this was Heaven's intention to abandon him, and it was not something human strength could...

 能也子駿改名應讖爲師市寵於  愧云 東漢書鄭玄戒子益恩曰吾家舊貧不爲父 母群弟所容出爲厮役之吏游學周秦之都 徃來幽并衮豫之域獲覲在位通人處逸大 儒咸從捧手有所受焉遂博稽六藝粗覽傳 記時睹秘書緯術之奥年過四十乃歸供養 坐黨禁錮十有四年公車再召比牒併名早 爲宰相彼數公懿德克堪王臣故宜式序吾 自忖度無任於此但念述先聖之元意思整 百家之不齊亦庶幾以竭吾才而黄巾爲害 萍浮南北復歸鄉邦歲已七十宿素衰落案 之禮典便合傳家今我告爾以老將隱居以 安性覃思以終業咨爾煢煢一夫曾無同生 相依其最求君子之道研鑚勿替敬愼威儀 以近有德顯譽成僚友德行立於己志若致 聲稱亦有榮於所生可不深念邪若忽忘不 識亦已焉哉  録曰愚觀康成生前所疏難不啻百餘萬  言臨末憤憤徒以所好群書卒皆腐敗不  得於禮堂寫定傳與其人且自嘆西方日  暮祗以其意戒子未嘗求知於人也及益  思赴北海之難身隕祚㣲益不足恃而所  注十三經及諸論述後世卒無寸遺孔子  不云不患莫己知求爲可知也其終身無  紱冕之情有讓爵之高亦非溢㫖比之馬  融羞曲士之節終以奢樂恣性黨附成譏  不可同日語也 班彪才高好述作專心史籍自司馬遷著史
Interpretation

To change one's name in order to match the prophecies, as Zijun did, and to treat this as a means of currying favor with one's teacher and the world, is truly shameful.

The Dong Han Shu records that Zheng Xuan admonished his son Yi'en, saying:

"Our family was poor in the past, and my parents and brothers could not tolerate me. I went out and worked as a laborer, and later traveled to study in the Zhou and Qin regions, and moved back and forth among Youzhou, Bingzhou, Yanzhou, Yuzhou and other places. I was able to pay respects to the worthy officials in office, to the hermits, and to the great Confucian scholars, and I humbly sought their instruction and gained something from it. Thereupon I broadly examined the Six Arts (the six Confucian classics), read through the various commentaries and records in general, and also encountered the profound contents of the secret books and of the apocryphal texts (weishu) on calendrical and divinatory arts.

"I did not return home to care for my parents until I was past forty, and afterward I was confined for fourteen years during the Partisan Proscriptions (Dangu zhi huo). When the court summoned me again, my name was listed together with those of others. Those several gentlemen of high office had virtuous conduct sufficient to shoulder the great responsibilities of the court, and they should have been appointed in due order. I measured myself and felt that I could not take on such a post. Yet I thought of clarifying the original intent of the former sages and of sorting out the tangled points in the teachings of the hundred schools, and perhaps I could do something with my full effort.

"The Yellow Turban Rebellion (Huangjin zhi luan) caused great harm, and I drifted like duckweed to the north and south before returning to my home district. By then I was seventy years old and my body was frail. According to ritual propriety, it is now fitting to pass the family estate on to you. I tell you that I am old, and I intend to retire in seclusion to nourish my nature and concentrate on my thinking, so as to complete my scholarship.

"You are alone, with no brothers to rely on. Your most important task is to pursue the way of the gentleman and to study diligently without slacking. Be scrupulous in your bearing and demeanor, and draw close to people of virtue. Let your conduct and reputation be established among your peers. If you can gain a good name, your parents will also be honored by it. How could you not give this serious thought? If you do not take it to heart, then I have nothing more to say."

The Hongdao Lu comments:

"In my view, the commentaries that Kangcheng (Zheng Xuan's courtesy name) wrote during his lifetime amounted to far more than a million words. In his later years he was indignant, simply because the books he loved most had all decayed, and he had not been able to have them copied out and fixed in the ritual hall for transmission to later generations. He lamented that he had reached old age and could only set down his intentions in the words he addressed to his son, without seeking fame from others.

"Later, Yi'en went to Beihai to meet calamity, and after his death the family fortunes declined, and Yi'en was not able to become a support. Yet Zheng Xuan's commentaries on the Thirteen Classics and his other treatises have been passed down to later ages without the slightest loss. Did not Confucius say, 'Do not worry that others do not know you; work to be worthy of being known'? Zheng Xuan throughout his life had no intention of seeking high office and rank, and he also possessed the noble quality of declining titles, so this is no exaggeration. Compare him with Ma Rong: Ma Rong prided himself on not deigning to associate with shallow scholars, but in the end he indulged in extravagant pleasures, and because he depended on the powerful he was criticized. The two truly cannot be placed on the same level."

Ban Biao was talented and outstanding, fond of composing writings, and devoted himself to studying historical records. Since Sima Qian completed his history……

記大初以後闕而不録好事者頗或綴集時 事然多鄙俗不足以踵繼其書彪乃繼採前 史遺事傍貫異聞作後傳數十篇因斟酌前 史譏正得失彪卒子固以彪所續前史未詳 乃潜精研思欲就其業既而有上書告固私 作國史詔下郡收固繫獄盡取其家書固弟 超恐爲郡所覈考不能自明乃馳詣闕上書 得召見具言固所著述意而郡亦上其書顯 宗甚奇之召詣校書○部蘭臺令史與前睢 陽令陳宗長陵令尹敏司隸從事孟異共成 世祖本紀遷爲郎典校秘書文撰列傳載記 二十八篇奏之帝乃復使終成前所著書固 以爲漢紹堯運以建帝業至於六世史臣乃 追述功德私作本紀編于百王之末厠於秦 項之列故探撰前記綴集所聞以爲漢書起 高祖終於孝平十有二世二百三十年綜其 行事傍貫五經通爲春秋考紀表志傳凡百 篇自永平受詔積思二十餘年至建初中乃 成當世甚重其書學者莫不諷誦焉  録曰愚觀班馬之述作皆有所祖潜精研  思無足多者獨以顯宗之峻刻不惟赦固  及身之烖而反假以制作之柄此千古以  來未之聞也抑孔子作春秋丘明述國語  皆當時之事所當避諱矧所遭皆季世若  必以爲罪當何如哉當何如哉故觀於壺  遂難司馬遷之言君子盖不可以不愼也 馬援兄子嚴敦並喜譏議通輕俠援書戒之
Interpretation

When recording events after the early years of the Great Beginning era, the histories left many gaps and omitted much material. People who enjoyed writing history sometimes pieced together accounts of events from that time, but their content was mostly vulgar and could not continue the established histories. Ban Biao, a historian of the Eastern Han, therefore continued to collect accounts omitted from earlier histories and drew on unusual reports from various sources. He wrote several dozen chapters of the Later Continuation, and also weighed the earlier histories, commenting on and correcting their errors and judgments.

After Ban Biao died, his son Ban Gu believed that his father’s continuation of the earlier histories remained unfinished. He devoted himself to the study of history, intending to complete his father’s work. Before long, someone submitted a report accusing Ban Gu of privately compiling the history of the state. The emperor issued an edict ordering local officials to arrest Ban Gu and imprison him, and to search his home and seize his books. Ban Gu’s younger brother Ban Chao, a general and historian of the Eastern Han, feared that when the local officials questioned Ban Gu about his manuscripts, he would be unable to defend himself. He therefore rode swiftly to the capital and submitted a memorial, gaining permission to enter the palace for an audience. He explained in detail the purpose of Ban Gu’s writings, and the local authorities also presented the manuscripts they had found.

Emperor Ming of Han, the second emperor of the Eastern Han, considered the manuscripts valuable. He summoned Ban Gu to the Orchid Terrace, the Eastern Han court institution responsible for collecting and collating books, and appointed him Director of Records there. Ban Gu worked with Chen Zong, former magistrate of Suiyang; Yin Min, magistrate of Changling; and Meng Yi, an official in the Metropolitan Commandant’s office, to compile the Basic Annals of Emperor Guangwu. Later, Ban Gu was promoted to court gentleman, placed in charge of collating the imperial library, and wrote twenty-eight chapters of biographies and accounts, which he presented to the emperor. Emperor Ming then again ordered him to complete the history he had begun earlier.

Ban Gu believed that the Han dynasty had received the Mandate of Yao and established its imperial enterprise, yet it was not until the sixth generation that historians began to recount the dynasty’s achievements. Someone had privately compiled basic annals, placing the Han rulers after the kings of earlier dynasties and alongside the Qin dynasty and Xiang Yu. Ban Gu therefore collected and edited earlier histories and gathered material from what he himself had heard, composing the Book of Han. It covers the history from Emperor Gaozu to Emperor Xiaoping, recording twelve generations across 230 years and bringing together the events of that period. It also draws on the principles that run through the Five Classics. The work is divided into basic annals, tables, treatises, and biographies, and comprises one hundred chapters. Ban Gu began compiling the history by imperial command during the Yongping era and devoted more than twenty years to planning and writing it. He completed it only during the Jianchu era. People of the time greatly valued the book, and scholars all read it.

The Hongdao Record comments: “In my view, the writings of Ban Biao and Sima Qian were both grounded in evidence. They applied themselves deeply to their studies, and there is nothing in their work that deserves severe censure. Emperor Ming of Han alone was stern and harsh. Not only did he fail to pardon Ban Gu and spare him imprisonment, he entrusted him with the great responsibility of compiling history. Nothing like this has ever been heard of since ancient times. Confucius compiled the Spring and Autumn Annals, and Zuo Qiuming wrote the Discourses of the States; both wrote about their own times, so naturally there were matters they had to avoid. Besides, the eras in which they lived were already in decline. If this must be treated as a crime, then what is to be done? What is to be done? Thus, when we read of Hu Sui questioning Sima Qian, a gentleman must surely be cautious.”

Ma Yan and Ma Dun, nephews of Ma Yuan, a general of the Eastern Han, both enjoyed discussing and criticizing current affairs and associated with chivalrous men of light conduct. Ma Yuan wrote them a letter of admonition…

曰吾欲汝曹聞人過失如聞父母之若耳可 得聞口不可得言也好議論人長短妄是非 政法此吾所大惡也寧死不願聞子孫有此 行也龍伯高敦厚周愼口無擇言謙約節儉 廉公有威吾愛之重之願汝曹效之杜季良 豪俠好義憂人之憂樂人之樂父喪致客數 郡畢至吾愛之重之不願汝曹效也效伯高 不得猶爲謹敕之士所謂刻鵠不成尚類鶩 者也效季良不得䧟爲天下輕薄子所謂畫 虎不成反類者也  録曰以援之謹𩛙而不免身後之謗何耶  夫援以壯時欲就邊郡田牧蓋未爲得志  也故其舊志自謂窮當益堅老當益壯夫  誰能奪之及其致身於人便爲分限雖欲  馬革褁尸甘心瞑目豈能盡如所願耶既  有請行之言又爲據鞍之態讒人從而媒  孽之此其求全之毁尚類於刻鵠之事向  非朱勃之論不幾於畫虎者耶將益信謹  𩛙之尚有未盡而輕俠之安所爲可乎 靈帝大誅黨人詔下急捕范滂等督郵吴導 至縣抱詔書閉傳舍伏牀而泣滂聞之曰必 爲我也即自詣獄縣令郭揖大驚出解印綬 引與俱亡曰天子大矣子何爲在此滂曰滂 死則禍塞何敢以罪累君又令老母流離乎 其母就與之訣滂白母曰仲博孝敬不足以 供養今從龍舒君𡚖黄泉存亡各得其所唯 大人割不忍之恩勿增感戚母曰汝今得與
Interpretation

I want you to hear of other people’s faults as you would hear of your parents’ faults: you may hear them, but you must not repeat them. I detest nothing more than gossiping about others’ strengths and weaknesses and casually passing judgment on right and wrong in public affairs. I would rather die than hear that my descendants behave this way.

Long Bogao was sincere and honest, cautious and thorough, careful in his speech, humble and frugal, and upright and respected. I admire and cherish him, and hope you will take him as your model. Du Jiliang was generous and chivalrous. He worried when others worried and rejoiced when they rejoiced. When his father died, many guests came to pay their respects, including people from several commanderies. I admire and cherish him too, but I do not want you to take him as your model. If you imitate Long Bogao and fall short, you will still become a careful and courteous person. It is like carving a swan: even if you do not succeed, at least it will resemble a duck. But if you imitate Du Jiliang and fall short, you may end up a frivolous person whom the whole world despises. It is like painting a tiger and failing to make it look like one, so that it turns into something else.

The Hongdao lu comments: Ma Yuan, a famed general of the Eastern Han whose courtesy name was Wenyuan, acted with care and thoroughness, yet still could not avoid slander after his death. Why was this?

When Ma Yuan was young, he wanted to go to a frontier commandery to cultivate fields and raise livestock, perhaps because he had not yet fulfilled his ambitions. He once said that the poorer one’s circumstances, the firmer one’s resolve; the older one grows, the more vigorous one’s determination becomes. Who could change such a resolve? But later, when he entrusted his future to others, he became constrained by his position and circumstances. Even if he was willing to die in battle, wrapped in his horse’s hide, and close his eyes in peace, how could everything go as he wished? He had both requested permission to go on campaign and made a show of bracing himself against his saddle, and so slander took the opportunity to stir up trouble. This kind of criticism that demands perfection resembles the saying, “If you fail to carve a swan, it will still resemble a duck.” Had Zhu Bo not spoken on his behalf, would Ma Yuan not have come close to the fate of “painting a tiger and failing”? This makes it all the clearer that even care and thoroughness have their limits. As for reckless, chivalrous conduct, what is there to recommend in it?

Emperor Ling of Han carried out a mass purge of the partisans and issued an urgent order to arrest Fan Pang and the others. The inspecting official Wu Dao arrived in the county, shut himself in the post station with the imperial order in his arms, and lay face down on the bed weeping. When Fan Pang heard of this, he said, “This must be because of me,” and went to surrender himself at the prison. The county magistrate Guo Yi was astonished. He removed his official seal and sash and planned to flee with Fan Pang, saying, “The emperor’s power is so great. Why do you remain here?”

Fan Pang replied, “If I die, the calamity can end. How could I dare to bring trouble upon you because of my offense? And how could I make my aged mother wander from place to place?” His mother came to bid him farewell. Fan Pang said to her, “I, Zhongbo, have not done enough to honor you, nor have I been able to provide for you properly. Now I am going to follow Lord Longshu, whom I respect, to the Yellow Springs; in life and death, each of us has a place to go. I only hope you will set aside the love that makes this unbearable and not grieve even more.” His mother said, “Now that you are able to…”

李杜齊名死亦何恨既有令名復求壽考可 兼得乎滂跪受教再拜而辭復顧其子曰吾 欲使汝爲惡則惡不可爲使汝爲善則我不 爲惡行路聞之莫不流涕  録曰范滂之母人謂歡其義也愚以爲不  得已而爲是言也苟使愛惜其死將何益  哉盍若辭之曰人生脩短自有義命顔回  爲善於爾何如有命自天不爲逭己豈不  達哉至於李杜生與同難死何足方若乃  名之一字始末禍端尤不當以爲言也所  竊喜者仲博有子龍舒克男仁者有後不  爲廢絶不然以未發白之齡而罹短命之  苦豈惟行道出涕其萬世痛絶也乎 晋書王裒父儀爲魏安東將軍司馬昭司馬 東關之敗昭問於衆曰今日之事誰任其咎 儀對曰責在元帥昭怒曰司馬欲委罪於孤 邪遂引出斬之裒痛父非命於是隱居教授 三徵七聘皆不就廬於墓側旦夕常至墓所 拜跪攀栢悲號涕淚着樹樹爲之枯讀詩至 哀哀父母生我劬勞未嘗不三復流涕門人 受業者並廢蓼莪之篇家貧躬耕計口而田 度身而蠶或有密助之者裒皆不聼及司馬 氏篡魏裒終身未嘗西向而坐以示不臣於 晋  録曰王祥孝矣及其爲三公也魏置其君  而視之如弁髦土□然曾不若剖氷求鯉  之堅且篤也孟宗賢矣及其爲大夫也吴  孫綝廢亮反爲告於廟而行之曾不若泣
Interpretation

Li Bai and Du Fu were renowned together. What regret is there in dying? Since they had already won a fine reputation, yet also wished for long life, could they really have both?

Fan Pang knelt and received his mother’s instruction. After bowing twice, he took his leave. As he departed, he turned back to his son and said, “If I were to ask you to do something evil, you should not do it. If I were to ask you to do something good, I myself have not managed to do it.” Everyone who heard these words on the road wept.

The Hongdao lu comments: Some believe that Fan Pang’s mother approved of her son’s righteous conduct. I think she spoke this way only because she had no choice. If all she wanted was for her son to preserve his life, what good would that do? It would have been better to advise him: “A person’s lifespan, long or short, is determined by Heaven. Yan Hui spent his life doing good; how much of that can you accomplish? Heaven determines one’s lifespan, and you cannot change it simply because you wish to escape death. Is it not a sign of great understanding to grasp this truth?” As for Li and Du, who suffered calamity alongside Fan Pang, how could their deaths possibly be compared? And the word “reputation” was the source of their misfortune from beginning to end; it should certainly not have been used to persuade him. What brings me a little comfort is that Zhongbo had a son, Longshu, who inherited his father’s benevolence, so the family line did not come to an end. Otherwise, a child not yet grown would have suffered an untimely death. The sorrow would have moved far more than passersby to tears; generations to come would have grieved over it.

The Book of Jin records: Wang Pou’s father, Wang Yi, served the state of Wei as General Who Pacifies the East. After Sima Zhao was defeated at Dongguan, he asked those around him, “Who should take responsibility for what happened today?” Wang Yi replied, “The responsibility lies with the commander-in-chief.” Sima Zhao flew into a rage and said, “Is Mr. Sima trying to shift the blame onto me?” He then ordered Wang Yi taken out and executed. Grief-stricken that his father had been unjustly killed, Wang Pou withdrew from public life and taught students. The court summoned him three times and offered him appointments seven times, but he refused to serve. He built a hut beside his father’s grave and went there to kneel and pay his respects every morning and evening. Clinging to a cypress, he wept aloud; his tears soaked the trunk, and the tree withered. Whenever he read the words from the Book of Songs, “Alas, my parents, who toiled to give me life,” he would recite them three times over, weeping without pause. The students who came to study with him could no longer bear to read the “Liao’e” poem in the Book of Songs. Wang Pou was poor, so he farmed with his own hands, allotting fields according to the number of people in the household and raising silkworms to meet his own needs. When people secretly offered him assistance, he refused it all. After the Sima clan usurped the state of Wei, Wang Pou never sat facing west for the rest of his life, thereby showing that he would not submit to the Jin dynasty.

The Hongdao lu comments: Wang Xiang was indeed filial. But once he had risen to become one of the Three Excellencies, Wei still had its own ruler, whom he treated as lightly as a hat or hair ornament. His loyalty was not as firm and deep as it had been when he split the ice to seek carp. Meng Zong was indeed virtuous. But after he became a minister, when Sun Lin of Wu deposed Sun Liang, Meng Zong instead reported the matter to the ancestral temple and then carried it out. This was no better than what he had done when he wept.

 竹感天之順且從也然則終身不西向者  豈徒誦哀哀父母而能然哉 兖州刺史王㫤爲人謹厚名其兄子曰默曰 沈名其子曰渾曰深爲書戒之曰吾以四者 爲名欲使汝曹顧名思義不敢違越也夫物 速成則疾亡晚就則善終朝華之草夕而零 落松栢之茂隆寒不衰是以君子戒於闕黨 也夫能屈以爲伸讓以爲得弱以爲强鮮不 遂矣夫毁譽者愛惡之原而禍福之機也孔 子曰吾之於人誰毁誰譽以聖人之德猶尚 如此况庸庸之徒哉人或毁己當退而求之 於身若己有可毁之行則彼言當矣若己無 可毁之行則彼言妄矣當則無怨於彼妄則 無害於身又何反報焉諺曰救寒莫若重裘 止謗莫如自脩斯言信矣  録曰昶之命子若預爲渾設也夫沈默渾  深四者皆謙厚不伐之㫖也是故願其如  海焉納百川而未見其盈也願其如泂焉  涉萬里而未見其止也以昶之謹厚而後  有渾與濟之洪雅使能充之於功名之際  則爲有道之士弘之於容人之量則成長  者之風豈不益賢乎哉借其狥於流俗狃  於愧恨既不免時人之譏及居台輔聲望  日减則頓失命名之義矣嗟夫 唐書貞觀二十二年上作帝範十二篇以賜 太子曰君體建親求賢審官納諫去讒戒盈 崇儉賞罰務農閱武崇文且曰脩身治國備
Interpretation

Bamboo has grasped Heaven’s principle of yielding and following, and so throughout its life it never turns toward the west. Can this be achieved merely by reciting, “Alas, my parents”?

Wang Chang, Inspector of Yan Province, was a cautious and generous man. He named his elder brother’s son Mo, meaning “silent,” and his own son Shen, meaning “reserved.” He also named a son Hun, meaning “deep,” and gave him the courtesy name Shen, also meaning “deep.” He wrote to admonish them: “I chose these four names for you so that, whenever you see them, you will reflect on their meanings and dare not act against them. Things that grow too quickly often decline quickly as well; those that mature later are more likely to endure to the end. Grass that blossoms in the morning has withered by evening, while the branches and leaves of pines and cypresses remain lush even in bitter cold. A gentleman, therefore, should guard against rashness and haste.

“One who can humble himself in order to advance, yield in order to gain, and appear weak in order to become strong will rarely fail to accomplish something. Slander and praise arise from affection and aversion, and are the turning points from which good fortune and calamity follow. Confucius said, ‘Whom have I slandered? Whom have I praised?’ If even a sage is so careful, how much more should ordinary people be?

“When someone slanders you, withdraw and examine yourself. If you have indeed done something deserving of blame, then what that person said is right. If there is nothing blameworthy in you, then what they said is nonsense. If they are right, you should not resent them; if they are wrong, their words do you no harm. Why, then, retaliate against them? As the saying goes, ‘Nothing keeps out the cold better than a thick fur coat; nothing puts an end to slander better than cultivating oneself.’ There is real truth in this.”

The Hongdao Lu comments: When Wang Chang named his children, it was as though he had already set an expectation for the one who would later be known as Wang Hun. All four names—Shen, Mo, Hun, and Shen—suggest humility, generosity, and an absence of self-display. Wang Chang hoped his children would be like the sea, receiving the waters of a hundred rivers without appearing self-satisfied; he also hoped they would be like deep waters, flowing for thousands of miles without coming to a halt. Grounded in Wang Chang’s cautious and generous family tradition, Wang Hun and Wang Ji later displayed a broad and refined bearing. If such qualities are put to use in achieving great things, one becomes a person of the Dao; if they are put to use in treating others with forbearance, they cultivate the manner of a generous elder. Would that not be even more admirable? Had they followed worldly customs and become trapped in shame and resentment, they would have been unable to escape the ridicule of their contemporaries. Later, when they held high positions and their reputations gradually diminished, they would also have failed the hopes entrusted to their names. Alas!

The Book of Tang records that in the twenty-second year of the Zhenguan era, Emperor Taizong of Tang composed twelve chapters of The Emperor’s Model and presented them to the Crown Prince. The chapters were titled “The Sovereign’s Bearing,” “Establishing Kinship,” “Seeking the Worthy,” “Selecting Officials,” “Receiving Remonstrance,” “Rejecting Slander,” “Guarding Against Complacency,” “Esteeming Frugality,” “Rewards and Punishments,” “Promoting Agriculture,” “Reviewing the Military,” and “Esteeming Learning.” Emperor Taizong also said, “The principles of cultivating oneself and governing the state are all contained in…” The original text breaks off here.

在其中一旦不諱更無所言矣又曰汝當更 求古之哲主以爲師如吾不足法也夫取法 於上僅得其中取法於中不免爲下吾居位 以來不善多矣錦繡珠玉不絶於前宫室臺 榭屢有興作犬馬鷹隼無遠不致行遊四方 供頓煩勞此皆吾之深過勿以爲是而法之 顧我弘濟蒼生其益多肇造區夏其功大益 多損少故人不怨功大過㣲故業不隳然比 之盡善固多愧矣汝無我之功勤而承我之 富貴竭力爲善則國家僅安驕惰奢縱則一 身不保且成遲敗速者國也失易得難者位 也可不惜哉可不愼哉  録曰唐太宗之教太子可謂至矣惜其於  君子之道槩乎其未之聞也夫君子之道  造端乎夫婦及其至也察乎天地此上古  聖人所以徹上徹下由内以及於外由家  以至於朝廷然後爲無弊也今觀自君體  建親以至閱武脩文莫不畢陳又自細㣲  過失以及事功顯迹悉皆無隱可謂至再  至三而未甞一及於刑家之道帝豈智不  及此哉武曌之禍蓋反巢刺之刃家事之  言速報脅父之謀耳豈惟訓誥而有遺兼  通讖記而無奈是以古之君子必務正心  誠意愼㣲謹獨未嘗一念之或苟然後及  於治國平天下一以貫之而無遺此其帝  之所獨闕而唐之所深禍歟 鄭善果父誠母崔氏嚴明節操愽涉書史通
Interpretation

In a situation like this, once I die, there will be nothing more to say. He also said, “You should seek out the wise rulers of antiquity as your teachers. I am not worthy of being imitated. If you imitate the very best, what you attain may still be only middling; if you imitate those who are middling, you are bound to sink to the lowest level. Since I came to the throne, I have done many things that were wrong. Brocades, fine jade, and other treasures have constantly been before my eyes, and palaces and towers have been built time and again. To obtain dogs, horses, and falcons, I spared no effort in seeking them out over long distances. I traveled throughout the realm, exhausting those who had to provide supplies and hospitality along the way. These are serious faults I have committed. Do not take them as proper conduct to imitate.

“Looking back, I have aided the people on a broad scale, bringing them great benefit; I also did much to lay the foundations of the Chinese realm. The benefits were many and the harm slight, so the people did not resent me; my achievements were great and my faults comparatively minor, so the foundations were not destroyed. Yet I would be deeply ashamed to claim that I had attained complete perfection. You have neither my achievements nor my diligence, yet you inherit my wealth and rank. If you do your utmost to practice goodness, the state may still be secure. But if you grow arrogant and idle, extravagant and indulgent, you may not even be able to preserve yourself. A state is slow to establish and quick to ruin; position is easily lost and hard to regain. How could you fail to cherish it? How could you fail to act with caution?”

The Hongdao Lu comments: Tang Taizong’s instruction to the crown prince may be called thorough indeed. Yet he seems not to have truly understood the Way of the noble person. The Way of the noble person begins in the ordinary dealings between husband and wife; when carried to its fullest extent, it can illuminate all things between Heaven and Earth. This is why the sages of high antiquity could connect what is above with what is below, what is within with what is without, and extend their influence from the family to the court, until affairs of state were free of shortcomings.

As we see it today, Tang Taizong spoke fully about what a ruler ought to do, the way to treat one’s relatives, the inspection of troops, and the cultivation of civil learning. He concealed nothing, whether speaking of small faults or notable achievements. One might say that he admonished the prince again and again, yet never mentioned the principles for governing the family. Could Taizong have failed to think of this? The disaster brought about by Wu Zhao—that is, Wu Zetian—arose from affairs within the family of Prince Cao Li; to speak of family matters would soon invite a plot to coerce one’s father. Taizong’s instructions were not merely incomplete: even a thorough knowledge of books of prophecy and portent could not have undone what followed.

For this reason, the noble persons of antiquity first rectified their hearts and made their intentions sincere. They treated the smallest matters with care and maintained their conduct even when alone. They allowed no thought to become careless; only then did they extend the Way of governing the state and bringing peace to all under Heaven. In this way, one principle ran through everything from beginning to end, leaving nothing out. This was perhaps Taizong’s particular failing, and the reason the Tang dynasty suffered such grave calamities.

Zheng Shanguo’s father, Zheng Cheng, and his mother, Lady Cui, were upright in conduct and steadfast in their integrity. They read the classics and histories widely and were learned in...

曉治方誠爲周大將軍討尉遲迴戰死善果 襲父爵及爲魯郡太守每出廳事母輒坐障 後察之聞其剖斷合理𡚖則大悅若行事不 允或妄嗔怒即還涕泣不食善果伏於床下 曰汝先君在官清恪以身狥國汝自童子襲 茅土至方伯案可妄加嗔怒墮於公政内墜 家風外虧天子之法何面目見汝先君善果 由是克己號爲清吏 崔玄暐母盧氏嘗戒玄暐曰吾聞姨兄辛玄 馭云子姓凡居仕宦人有言貧乏不能存此 是好消息若聞財貨充積此惡消息吾甞以 爲確論比見親表中務多財以奉親而其親 不究所從來必出乎廪禄則善矣如其不然 何異盗乎若汝爲吏不能忠清無以戴天履 地宜識吾意故玄暐所至以清白名  録曰鄭善果之母談虎而色變蓋有所傷  之也故其詞也烈崔玄暐之母見賢而思  齊夫有所受之也故其詞也温二子卒皆  以清白聞信乎陰教之不虚也而玄暐遂  能反正廢主有大功於唐較之善果晩節  盖有間矣 韓休子七人浩洽洪汯滉渾洄皆有學尚節 義籍甚於時安禄山反皆䧟賊逼以官不受 出奔行在爲賊所擒浩洪渾皆遇害肅宗以 大臣子能死難詔贈浩吏部郎中洪太常卿 渾太常少卿汯終諫議大夫洽終殿中侍御 史洄終國子祭酒滉貞元元年加檢校左僕 射同中書門下平章事滉性節儉居嘗陋薄
Interpretation

When Zheng Shanguo was young, his father, Zheng Cheng, died in battle while serving as a general of the Zhou dynasty and campaigning against Yuchi Jiong. Zheng Shanguo inherited his father’s title and later became governor of Lu Commandery. Whenever he went to the government office to conduct business, his mother would sit behind a screen and observe him. When she heard that he had judged cases and handled affairs fairly and reasonably, she was very pleased. But if she heard that he had acted improperly or become angry without cause, she would return to her room, weep, and refuse to eat. Zheng Shanguo lay prostrate beneath her bed and said, “When my father was alive, he served as an official with integrity and care, and gave his life for his country. I inherited his title when I was still a child, and now I have become a regional governor. How could I give way to anger, damage the administration, bring dishonor to our family, and violate the laws of the Son of Heaven? How could I face my late father?” From then on, Zheng Shanguo held himself to strict standards and became known as an incorruptible official.

Cui Xuanwei’s mother, Lady Lu, once cautioned him: “I heard from my cousin Xin Xuanyu that when someone among the descendants holds office, it is good news if people say the family is poor and struggling to make ends meet; but it is bad news if they say the household is piled high with possessions. I have always thought this a very sound observation. Recently, I have seen some of our relatives devote themselves to gathering money to support their parents, while the parents never ask where that money came from. If it truly comes from their salaries, that is naturally a good thing. If not, how is it any different from theft? If you cannot serve as an official with loyalty and integrity, you will have no face to stand between Heaven and Earth. Remember what I have told you.” Accordingly, wherever Cui Xuanwei served, he was renowned for his integrity.

The Hongdao Lu comments: “When Zheng Shanguo’s mother spoke of her son, her expression would change. Perhaps she had once felt anxiety or fear, which made her words severe. Cui Xuanwei’s mother, by contrast, could see virtue in others and aspire to follow it. Perhaps she had inherited and learned this teaching, which made her words gentle. In the end, both men became known for their integrity, showing how effective a mother’s guidance can be. Cui Xuanwei later helped restore the Tang dynasty’s legitimate rule and depose a ruler who had thrown the government into disorder, rendering great service to the dynasty. In comparison with Zheng Shanguo, his conduct in his later years was indeed even more distinguished.”

Han Xiu had seven sons, named Hao, Qia, Hong, Hong, Huang, Hun, and Hui. They were all learned, valued moral integrity and righteousness, and were widely renowned in their time. During An Lushan’s rebellion, they were all captured by the rebels, who pressured them to accept official posts. They refused and fled to the imperial court’s temporary residence. Later, the rebels captured them again, and Hao, Hong, and Hun were all killed. Emperor Suzong considered that, as sons of a high official, they had given their lives for the state, and issued an edict posthumously granting them official titles: Hao was made Director of the Ministry of Personnel, Hong Grand Master of Ceremonies, and Hun Deputy Grand Master of Ceremonies. Hong eventually rose to become an Admonition Official, Qia to a Palace Censor, and Hui to Director of the Directorate of Education. In the first year of the Zhenyuan era, Huang was additionally appointed Left Vice Director of the Department of State Affairs and Tong Zhongshu Menxia Pingzhangshi. Huang was frugal by nature, and lived in a plain, modest residence.

取庇風雨門當列戟以父時第門不忍壞乃 不敢請堂先無挾廡弟洄稍增補之輙除去 曰先君容焉吾等奉之常恐失墜若摧圮繕 之則已安敢改作以傷儉德居重位清潔疾 惡不爲家人資産初判度支李晟以裨將白 軍事滉待之加禮使其子拜之厚遺器幣鞍 馬後晟終立大功幼時已有美名晚節益峻 其家範訓餙子弟甚嚴故貞元間言家法者 曰韓氏穆氏云 穆寧子四人賛質貟賞世以儒聞而剛正氣 節自任以明經調𥂁山尉過平原見顔眞卿 及聞禄山反即遺眞卿書以其子屬其母弟 曰苟不乏嗣足矣即馳謁眞卿曰先人有嗣 我可以從公死也既而眞卿過河見肅宗問 狀異之將以爲諫議大夫德宗在奉天奔詣 行在擢秘書少監太子右庶子及寧之老賛 爲御史中丞質右補闕員侍御史賞監察御 史皆以守道行誼爲縉紳所仰賛最孝謹質 强直員工文詞賞尚節義俱有令譽而和粹 當時以珍味目之賛俗而有格爲酪質美而 多入爲酥員爲醍醐賞爲乳腐寧平居嘗譔 家令訓諸子人一通戒曰君子之事親養志 爲大吾志直道而已苟枉而道三牲九𣇄非 吾養也  録曰休一代元臣其家法峻整有自來也  寧儒而已何至與韓氏並稱耶蓋節義之  在天地間匹夫之於王公一也是故有歲  寒之澹蕩而後有春融之敷華休之許國
Interpretation

To keep out wind and rain, ceremonial halberds should have been set up before the gate. But this was the residence where his father had lived, and Mu Huang could not bear to tear down the old gate, so he left it as it was. The main hall had no side corridors originally. His younger brother, Mu Hui, made a few additions, but Huang immediately ordered them removed. “Our late father once lived here. We honor this old home and are always afraid something might damage it. If a building collapses, we can repair it. How could we dare rebuild it and thereby harm our late father’s virtue of valuing simplicity?”

Though he held high office, he was incorruptible and hated evil, and left no family wealth behind for his relatives. When Li Sheng first took up the post of Fiscal Commissioner, he was still a deputy general and once reported to Huang on military affairs. Huang received him with courtesy, had his own son bow to Li Sheng, and presented him with valuable objects, money, silk, and a saddle horse. Li Sheng later achieved great distinction. Huang had already earned a fine reputation in his youth, and in old age his standards of conduct grew still stricter. He governed his household and instructed his sons with great rigor. For this reason, during the Zhenyuan era, those renowned for managing their households well often spoke of the Han and Mu families together.

Mu Ning had four sons: Zan, Zhi, Yuan, and Shang. People regarded them all as renowned for their Confucian learning, and each took pride in being upright and steadfast. Mu Ning entered government through the Classics examination, which selected candidates for their mastery of the scriptures, and was appointed County Commandant of Yanshan. While passing through Pingyuan, he visited Yan Zhenqing. When he heard that An Lushan had rebelled, he immediately wrote to Yan Zhenqing, entrusting his sons to his younger brother by the same mother. “So long as the family line does not die out, that will be enough.” He then hurried to see Yan Zhenqing and said, “My ancestors already have descendants to carry on the line. I can now follow you to my death.”

Later, when Yan Zhenqing crossed the Yellow River and met Emperor Suzong, he reported this matter. Suzong was greatly impressed and prepared to appoint Mu Ning as an Admonition Grand Master. When Emperor Dezong fled the turmoil and reached Fengtian, Mu Ning hurried to join him. He was promoted to Secretary Junior Supervisor and Right Attendant to the Heir Apparent. In Mu Ning’s old age, Zan served as Investigating Censor-in-Chief, Zhi as Right Reminder, Yuan as Attendant Censor, and Shang as Supervising Censor. They all held fast to what was right and conducted themselves with integrity, earning the respect of the scholar-officials.

Zan was the most filial and cautious; Zhi was strong-willed and upright; Yuan was skilled at writing; and Shang prized moral integrity. All enjoyed fine reputations and had gentle, generous temperaments. People of the time compared them to prized dairy products: Zan was like fermented milk, Zhi like cream, Yuan like clarified butter, and Shang like curdled milk. Mu Ning once wrote down family instructions, gave a copy to each son, and admonished them: “For a gentleman serving his parents, the most important thing is to accord with their wishes. My only aim is to uphold what is right. If you want me to go against what is right, then even an abundant offering of the three sacrificial animals and the nine cauldrons would not count as supporting me with filial devotion.”

The Hongdao Record comments: “Mu Xiu was a senior minister of his age, and the strictness of his family tradition had its roots. Mu Ning was merely a Confucian scholar, so how could he be named alongside the Han family? It is because moral integrity in the world is equally precious, whether it belongs to commoners or princes. Just as the harshness of winter reveals the calm endurance of pines and cypresses, only then do the warmth of spring and the flourishing of flowers and trees follow. Mu Xiu pledged his life to the state…” The original ends unfinished, deliberately leaving the thought suspended.

 以義寧之許友以死凛凛乎立身大節可  以爲柯幹可以爲巖石他日和之爲羹𣇄  調之爲𥂁梅無惑乎皆以珍味目之也然  則當時之說豈無謂哉 弘
Interpretation

Xu You took his own life by the sword in Xudu for the sake of what was right. His resolute defense of the great principles of conduct and public life makes him a model for the world and a pillar of the state. If, in later times, he is brought together with other figures and harmonized with them, like seasonings added to soup or salt and sour plum used to flavor a dish, it is little wonder that people call them all precious men. Seen in this light, was what people said at the time really without reason?

Note: “Trunk and branch” refers to a mainstay or pillar. “Salt and sour plum” were common seasonings and often served as a metaphor for talented people who assist in governing the state.

道録卷之十九

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5h0033); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 11 Vol. 13 →