中文 · EN

《莊子翼》Vol. 2

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Xu Daozang 續道藏 Vol. 2 / 8 28,493 characters

About this page. The original text of 《莊子翼》 Vol. 2 (Xu Daozang 續道藏, 8 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 56 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《莊子翼》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

莊子翼卷之二振二   人間世第四 顔回見仲尼請行曰奚之曰將之衛曰奚爲 焉曰回聞衛君其年壯其行獨輕用其國而 不見其過輕用民死死者以國量乎澤若蕉 民其無如矣回嘗聞之夫子曰治國去之亂 國就之醫門多疾願以所聞思其則庶幾其 國有瘳乎仲尼曰譆若殆徃而刑耳夫道不 欲雜雜則多多則擾擾則憂憂而不救古之 至人先存諸己而後存諸人所存於己者未 定何暇至於暴人之所行且若亦知夫德之 所蕩而知之所爲出乎哉德蕩乎名知出乎 爭名也者相軋也知也者爭之器也二者凶 器非所以盡行也且德厚信矼打未達人氣 名聞不爭未達人心而疆以仁義繩墨之言 術暴人之前者是以人惡有其美也命之曰 菑人菑人者人必反菑之若殆爲人菑夫且 苟爲悅賢而惡不肖惡用而求有以異若唯 無詔王公必將乘人而鬥其捷而目將熒之 而色將平之口將營之容將形之心具成之 是以火救火以水救水名之曰益多順始無 窮若殆以不信厚言必死於暴人之前矣且 昔者桀殺關龍逢紂殺王子比干是皆修其 身以下傴拊人之民以下拂其上者也故其 君因其修以擠之是好名者也昔者堯攻叢 枝胥敖禹攻有扈國爲虛厲身爲形戮其用 兵不止其求實無已是皆求名實者也而獨
Interpretation

Yan Hui (Confucius' disciple) went to pay respects to Confucius (Zhongni), requesting permission to travel abroad. When Confucius asked about his destination, Yan Hui said he planned to visit the state of Wei. Asked his purpose, Yan Hui replied: "I've heard the ruler of Wei is young and impetuous, governing autocratically while recklessly expending state resources without recognizing his errors. The people suffer innumerable casualties—corpses pile up like reeds in a marsh, leaving the populace with no way out."

Yan Hui continued: "I remember your teaching that well-governed states may be left behind, while troubled ones deserve our aid. Just as the sick naturally gather before a physician's door, I wish to apply the principles I've learned to contemplate governance methods that might restore this state."

But Confucius responded gravely: "Alas! Your journey would likely court disaster. The Dao (the Way) abhors fragmentation—fragmentation breeds complications, complications create chaos, chaos invites calamity, and once calamity strikes, recovery becomes impossible. Ancient sages who attained the Dao always cultivated themselves before influencing others. How can one who hasn't perfected self-cultivation presume to rectify a tyrant's conduct?"

Confucius elaborated: "Do you understand why virtue (De) decays and why wisdom invites misfortune? Virtue decays through pursuit of empty fame, while wisdom becomes a weapon for contention. Reputation makes men undermine each other; cleverness provides tools for conflict—both are dangerous instruments unfit for perfecting virtue."

"Even with impeccable character and unwavering integrity, you may fail to move others. Even eschewing fame and profit, you might not win hearts. Forcing moral admonitions upon a tyrant amounts to highlighting his faults to showcase your virtue—this we call 'harming others.' Harmers inevitably face retaliation—you'd merely bring disaster upon yourself."

Illustrating his point, Confucius cited historical examples: "Jie of Xia executed Guan Longfeng, Zhou of Shang killed Bi Gan—both sages who cultivated themselves yet offended tyrants. When Yao campaigned against Congzhi and Xu'ao, and Yu attacked Youhu, their targets became wastelands where people suffered through endless warfare—all consequences of pursuing reputation and material gain."

不聞之乎名實者聖人之所不能勝升也而 况若乎雖然若必有以也嘗以語我來顔回 曰端而虛勉而一則可乎曰惡惡可夫以陽 爲充孔揚采色不定常人之所不違因案人 之所感以求容與其心名之曰日漸之德不 成而况大德乎將執而不化外合而内不訾 其庸詎可乎然則我内直而外曲成而上比 内直者與天爲徒與天爲徒者知天子之與 己皆天之所子而獨以己言蘄乎而人善之 蘄乎而人不善之邪若然者人謂之童子是 之謂與天爲徒外曲者與人之爲徒也擎跽 曲拳人臣之禮也人皆爲之吾敢不爲耶爲 人之所爲者人亦無疵焉是之謂與人爲徒 成而上比者與古爲徒其言雖教謫之實也 古之有也非吾有也若然者雖直不爲病是 之謂與古爲徒若是則可乎仲尼曰惡惡可 太多政法而不諜雖固亦無罪雖然止是耳 矣夫胡可以及化猶師心者也 郭註行獨不與民同欲也輕用其國者人君  動必乘人一怒則伏尸流血一喜則軒冕  塞路故君人者之用國不可輕也不見其  過莫敢諫也輕用民死輕用之於死也死  者以國量乎澤若蕉舉國而輸之死地不  可稱數視之如草介也民其無如矣無所  依歸也道不欲雜言宜正得其人若夫不  得其人則雖百醫守病適足致疑而不能  一愈也古之至人有其具然後可以接物
Interpretation

Here, through the dialogue between Confucius and Yan Hui, Zhuangzi explores three progressive realms of engaging with the world.

Yan Hui first proposes two approaches: maintaining dignified appearances while keeping the mind empty and still, or striving for single-minded concentration. Confucius considers these insufficient, pointing out that when one's inner Qi (vital energy) becomes agitated and emotional fluctuations become noticeable—so obvious that even ordinary people can detect them—such forced attempts to please others will gradually deplete one's De (Virtue), let alone cultivate great Virtue. How can one proceed by stubbornly clinging to personal views while inwardly resisting, or superficially agreeing while secretly opposing?

Yan Hui then presents a more refined threefold approach: First, "walking as a disciple of Heaven" (taking the Dao of Heaven as one's standard), maintaining inner integrity like an innocent child, understanding that both the emperor and oneself are equally Heaven's children—unshaken by others' judgments. Second, "walking as a disciple of men" (conforming to worldly rituals), performing bows and courtesies like ordinary people, observing ministerial etiquette so others find no fault. Third, "walking as a disciple of antiquity" (emulating ancient sages), though offering admonishments, drawing wisdom from ancient teachings so even blunt speech avoids misfortune.

Confucius ultimately observes that even this remains somewhat contrived—too many rules sacrifice adaptability. True sages never cling stubbornly to views, whereas ordinary rulers who wield power rashly may shed rivers of blood in anger or bestow reckless rewards in delight. Governing a state cannot be approached lightly; otherwise, the people become like grass cast into a swamp—countless perish without recourse. Just as curing illness requires the right remedy, governing requires the right person; otherwise, even numerous skilled physicians cannot heal the land. The perfected ones of antiquity (those who attained the Dao) first cultivated themselves before properly handling external affairs.

This dialogue reveals Daoist wisdom for engaging with the world: maintaining inner unity with the Dao of Heaven while outwardly conforming to worldly rituals, drawing on ancient wisdom yet remaining unattached—only when all three are harmonized without fixation does one attain true mastery.

 彼不虛心以應物而役思以犯難故知其  所存於己者未定也夫唯外其知以養眞  寄妙當於群才功名歸物而患慮逺身然  後可以至於暴人之所行也且德之所以  流蕩者矜名故也知之所以橫出者爭善  故也雖復桀跖其所矜惜無非名善也名  知者世之所用也而名起則相軋知用則  爭興故遣名知而後行可盡也夫投人夜  光鮮不按劒者未達故耳回之德信與其  不爭之名彼所未達也而强以仁義準繩  於彼彼將謂回欲毁人以自成也是故至  人不役志以經世而虛心以應物誠信著  於天地不爭暢於萬物然後萬物歸懷天  地不逆故德音發而天下響會景行彰而  六合俱應始可以經寒暑涉治亂而不與  逆鱗迕也菑人者人必反菑之適不信受  則謂與己爭名而反害之也苟能悅賢惡  愚聞義而服便爲明君君明則不苦無賢  臣汝徃亦不足復竒如其不爾徃必受害  故以有心而徃無徃而可無心而應其應  自來則無徃而不可也汝唯有寂然不言  耳言則工公必乘人以君人之勢而角其  捷辯以距諫飾非而目將熒之使人眼眩  也色將平之不能復自異於彼也口將營  之自救解不暇也容形心成乃且釋己以  從彼也名之曰益多適不能救乃更足以  成彼之盛也順始無窮尋常守故未肯變  也不信厚言未信而諫雖厚爲害也龍逢
Interpretation

This passage expounds on the wisdom of navigating worldly affairs and self-cultivation. Zhuangzi uses the example of Yan Hui (Confucius' disciple) to illustrate that when one cannot respond to external matters with an open mind but instead becomes entangled in personal anxieties, it reveals insufficient stability in inner cultivation. Truly wise individuals do not deliberately pursue fame or talent, but rather set aside such external concerns to nurture their authentic nature.

The text points out that moral degeneration arises from people's craving for empty reputation, while the misuse of wisdom stems from contentiousness. Even notorious figures like the tyrant Jie of Xia or the bandit Zhi ultimately valued nothing more than fame and ability. Though reputation and intellect are prized by the world, pursuing them only provokes conflict. Only by relinquishing attachment to fame and wisdom can one fully manifest one's De (Virtue/Power).

Zhuangzi employs the metaphor of gifting a luminous pearl at night: the recipient might draw his sword in suspicion, misunderstanding your goodwill. Though Yan Hui possessed noble character and refrained from worldly competition, forcibly imposing ren-yi (benevolence-righteousness) standards on others could be misconstrued as self-aggrandizement through their denigration.

The truly enlightened never manipulate worldly affairs deliberately, but meet all things with serene emptiness. Their sincerity shines between heaven and earth; their Wuwei (non-action) virtue flows unimpeded through all creation. Thus all beings naturally follow them, and heaven itself offers no resistance. When their De issues a call, the world responds; when their noble conduct manifests, the six directions echo in harmony. Only such people can weather seasonal changes and political upheavals without offending others' "reverse scales" (metaphor for provoking hostility).

Those who harm others inevitably face retribution. If met with distrust, your well-intentioned advice may be perceived as competition for reputation, inviting harm instead. Drawing near to worthies while avoiding fools, embracing the Dao upon hearing it—this marks enlightened rulership. Such rulers never lack virtuous ministers. Venturing forth without these conditions guarantees misfortune. Therefore, deliberate intentions render one unfit anywhere, while Wuwei responsiveness naturally elicits proper reciprocation.

Best maintain silent stillness. Speaking inevitably invites rulers to wield authority oppressively, deploying sophistry to reject counsel while concealing faults. This dazzles your vision, pacifies your expression (eroding conviction), and exhausts your speech in self-justification—until mind and body assimilate to their influence. Far from remedying situations, this fuels their arrogance.

Initial compliance leads to endless concessions; stubborn adherence to old ways proves equally ineffective. Forcing advice when trust is absent courts disaster despite earnest words—as witnessed by Guan Longfeng (the loyal minister of Jie), who ultimately destroyed himself.

 比干居下而任上之憂非其事也故其君  擠之不欲令臣有勝君之名也夫暴君若  叢枝胥敖有扈非徒恣欲乃復求名但所  求者非其道耳惜名貪欲之君雖復堯禹  不能勝化也故與衆攻之而汝乃欲空手  而徃化之以道哉端而虛正其形而虛其  心也勉而一言遜而不二也惡惡可者言  未可也衛君亢陽之性充張於内而甚揚  於外强禦之至也采色不定喜怒無常也  夫頑强之甚人以快事感己己陵藉而乃  抑挫之以求從容自放而遂其侈心雖小  德且不能成將故守其本意執而不化即  汝之端虛勉一外合而内不訾此未足以  化之也顔回更說三條内直者與天爲徒  言物無貴賤得生一也故善與不善付之  公當耳一無所求於人若然者依乎天理  推己性命若嬰兒之直徃也外曲者與人  爲徒言外形委曲隨人事之所當爲也成  而上比者與古爲徒言成於今而比於古  雖是常教有諷責之㫖然寄直於古故無  以病我也仲尼猶以爲未可意謂當理無  二而張三條以政之與事不冥耳雖未弘  大亦且不見咎責然於化則未以其挾三  術以適彼非經心而付之天下也 筆乘若唯無詔王公句絶詔告也汝唯無告  王公則已言則必且乘人而鬥其捷云云  皆指顔子也 顔回曰吾無以進矣敢問其方仲尼曰齋吾
Interpretation

Bi Gan, though holding a lowly position in the Shang dynasty, concerned himself with matters that belonged to the ruler—affairs beyond his proper station. Thus his sovereign ostracized him, unwilling to let a minister outshine the throne. Tyrannical rulers like Congzhi, Xu'ao, and Youhu not only indulged their desires but also pursued fame, though their methods were utterly misguided. Such rulers, craving empty reputation while wallowing in excess, would prove impervious even to the moral influence of sage-kings like Yao, Shun, or Yu. When all unite to overthrow them, how could you expect to transform them through virtue (De) alone, arriving empty-handed?

The phrase "upright yet empty" describes maintaining external propriety while preserving inner stillness. "Diligent yet unified" means speaking with humility and flexibility. "Rejecting the unacceptable" declares "this will not do." The ruler of Wei embodies excessive Yang energy—his inner being seethes with violent Qi, while outwardly he displays extreme arrogance, his rigidity reaching its zenith. His moods shift unpredictably; his countenance changes in an instant. Confronting such obstinacy, attempts to sway him through pleasantries only provoke suppression, as he seeks solely to indulge his inflated selfish desires. This man, incapable of even minor virtue (De), clings stubbornly to his views without repentance. Your approach—outwardly proper yet inwardly dismissive—holds no power to transform him.

Yan Hui proposed three methods: "Inner alignment" means walking with the Dao, recognizing no hierarchy among the myriad things, viewing all life as equal. Thus one treats good and evil impartially, making no demands of others. This constitutes following heavenly principle—acting with the spontaneity of an infant. "Outward yielding" means moving with the world, displaying harmony while performing conventional duties. "Achieving through ancient models" means standing with the sages of old, measuring present actions against their standards. Though these teachings contain admonition, by couching integrity in ancient wisdom, they avoid provoking blame.

Confucius still deemed these insufficient, observing that while the Dao is singular, splitting it into three responses creates dissonance with reality. Though unlikely to incur serious reproach, they remain ineffective for transforming the Wei ruler. Carrying these three methods to Wei betrays no genuine concern for the people.

The Bi Cheng commentary explains the phrase "only by not memorializing the nobility" should be read as "issuing proclamations." Simply refrain from petitioning the lords—once you speak, contention becomes inevitable. These criticisms all address Yan Hui directly.

Yan Hui said: "I've exhausted my ideas. May I ask your guidance?" Confucius replied: "First observe the purification ritual (Zhaijiao), then I shall instruct you."

將語若有而爲之其易異邪易之者皥天不 宜顏回曰回之家貧唯不飲酒不茹葷者數 月矣若此則可以爲齋乎曰是祭祀之齋非 心齋也回曰敢問心齋仲尼曰若一志無聽 之以耳而聽之以心無聽之以心而聽之以 氣聽止於耳心止於符氣也者虛而待物者 也唯道集虛虛者心齋也顔回曰回之未始 得使實自回也得使之也未始有回也可謂 虛乎夫子曰盡矣吾語若若能入遊其樊而 無感其名入則鳴不入則止無門無毒一宅 而寓於不得己則幾矣絶迹易無行地難爲 人使易以僞爲天使難以僞聞以有翼飛者 矣未聞以無翼飛者也聞以有知知者矣未 聞以無知知者也瞻彼闋者虛室生白吉祥 止止夫且不止是之謂坐馳夫徇耳目内通 而外於心知鬼神將來舍而况人乎是萬物 之化也禹舜之所紐者伏戲羲凡蘧之所行 終而况散焉者乎 郭註夫有其心而爲之者誠恭易也以有爲  爲易未見其宜也若一志者請去異端而    任獨也遺耳目去心意而符氣性之自得  此虛以待物者也唯道集虛虛其心則至  道集於懷也未使實自回者未使心齋故  有其身也得便未始有回者既得心齋之  使則無其身也入遊其樊而無感其名者  放心自得之場當於實而止也譬之官商  應而無心故曰鳴也夫無心而應者任彼
Interpretation

This passage recounts Yan Hui's inquiry to Confucius about the true meaning of "heart-mind fasting" (xinzai, spiritual purification). Confucius explains that genuine fasting isn't about external rituals like abstaining from wine or meat—those are merely ceremonial observances for sacrifices.

Confucius elaborates that heart-mind fasting requires three stages: First, focus intently—listen not with ears but with the heart. Progress further by listening not with the heart but with Qi (primordial energy). The ears perceive only sounds, the mind comprehends only phenomena, whereas Qi represents the state of emptiness that embraces all things. Only the Dao can gather within this emptiness—such voidness constitutes true heart-mind fasting.

Upon hearing this, Yan Hui experiences sudden enlightenment. He confesses his previous attachment to the notion of "self," now realizing heart-mind fasting means attaining selflessness. Confucius affirms his realization and further instructs: Move through worldly affairs unswayed by fame or gain; speak when appropriate, remain silent when not—be natural as if having no gate to guard or poison to fear. Not walking is easy, but walking without leaving traces is hard; being driven by others allows pretense, but aligning with Heaven's Dao resists falsity. Just as wings enable flight and knowledge enables understanding, contemplating an empty chamber generates illumination—this is an auspicious sign. When the heart-mind cannot settle, it becomes "sitting while galloping" (body still but mind racing).

Finally, Confucius reveals that when senses turn inward to transcend mental limitations, even spirits will submit—how much more so ordinary people? This constitutes the mystery of universal transformation, the principle grasped by sage-kings like Yu and Shun, the lifelong practice of ancient sages like Fuxi.

Guo Xiang's commentary adds: Deliberate effort often breeds superficiality. True concentration means eliminating distractions, relinquishing sensory and intellectual grasping, allowing primordial Qi to manifest spontaneously. Only an empty heart can contain the Great Dao. Before cultivating heart-mind fasting, one clings to self; after mastery, selflessness emerges. Like musical harmony responding naturally, effortless attunement perceives all phenomena.

 耳不强應也使物自若無門者也付天下  之自安無毒者也毒治也不得已者理之  必然者也體至一之宅而會乎必然之符  也則幾矣理盡於斯也不行則易欲行而  不踐地不可能也無爲則易欲爲而不傷  性不可得也視聽之所得者粗故易欺也  至於自然之報細故難僞也則失眞少者  不全亦少失眞多者不全亦多失得之報  未有不當其分者也而欲違天爲僞不亦  難乎有翼有知之喻言必有其具乃能其  事今無至虛之宅無由有化物之實也夫  視有若無虛室者也室虛而純白獨生矣  吉祥之所集者至虛至靜也若夫不止於  當不會於極此爲以應坐之日而馳鶩不  息也故外敵未至而内已困矣豈能化物  哉夫使耳目閉而自然得者心知之用外  矣故將任性直通無徃不冥尚無幽昩之  貴而况人間之累乎物無貴賤未有不由  心知耳目以自通者也故世之所謂知者  豈欲知而知哉所謂見者豈謂見而見哉  若夫知見可以欲爲而得者則欲賢可以  得賢爲聖可以得聖乎固不可矣而世不  知知之自知因欲爲知以知之不見見之  自見因欲爲見以見之不知生之自生又  將爲生以生之故見目而求離婁之明見  耳而責師曠之聦故心神奔馳於内耳目  竭喪於外身處不適則與物不冥矣不冥  矣而能合乎人間之變應乎世世之節者
Interpretation

The ears do not deliberately listen, allowing all things to exist naturally, as if there were no gateway; entrusting the world to its natural stability without forcibly governing it. What is called "toxicity" (referring to human intervention) is the inevitable principle that must be addressed only when absolutely necessary.

To realize the dwelling of the "utmost oneness" (the highest state of the Dao) and align with this inevitable principle is to come close to the Dao. The principle is right here—inaction is naturally easy, but to act without engaging with reality is impossible; wuwei (non-action) may seem simple, yet to act without harming one's innate nature is unattainable.

What the eyes and ears perceive are superficial appearances, easily deceived; whereas the laws of nature are subtle and profound, difficult to falsify. Those who lose little of their original truth have few flaws; those who lose much of it have many flaws. The retribution of gain and loss never fails to match its measure. To attempt deception by violating the natural order—isn’t that exceedingly difficult?

Using the metaphor "only with wings can one fly" illustrates that certain conditions must be met for success. Without a mind of utmost emptiness, it is impossible to truly resonate with all things. To regard substantial existence as emptiness is the clarity of an empty mind—when the inner void is pure, true wisdom arises. Where auspiciousness gathers must be the state of utmost stillness.

If the mind cannot settle in the present moment, cannot unite with the ultimate truth, it is like rushing about when one should be sitting in quiet cultivation—before external adversaries even arrive, the inner self is already exhausted. How, then, can one resonate with all things? In truth, closing off the senses of hearing and sight allows natural realization—this is the mind’s function surpassing the senses. Thus, following one’s nature to directly connect with the Dao leads to profound mystery wherever one goes; even the realm of the unseen is not worth valuing, let alone the burdens of human affairs.

All things inherently lack distinctions of nobility and baseness; people perceive the world through mind and senses. What the world calls "knowing"—can it truly be obtained merely by desiring to know? What it calls "seeing"—can it truly be achieved merely by wishing to see? If knowledge and insight could be acquired through desire, then wanting to be a sage would make one a sage, and aspiring to be a sage would make it so—yet clearly, this is impossible.

Yet people do not understand that "knowing" is naturally clear, yet they forcibly seek it; they do not see that "seeing" is naturally manifest, yet they forcibly pursue it; they do not realize that "life" is naturally occurring, yet they forcibly strive for it.

It is like seeing the eyes and demanding the vision of Li Lou (an ancient figure famed for keen sight), or observing the ears and reproaching them for lacking the hearing of Shi Kuang (a legendary master musician). As a result, the spirit is exhausted within, the ears and eyes are depleted without, and body and mind find no peace—unable to merge with all things. Without merging with the Dao, how can one hope to respond to the changes of human affairs and align with the rhythms of the times? It is simply impossible.

 未之有也 筆乘爲天使爲人使與未始得使及得使之  使相應顏子間虛爲心齋也而霍然有悟  故曰回之不能運動如意者有我也能運  動如意者無我也夫子嘆其盡善而又告  之曰女能逰其樊而無動于名意合則言  不合則止廣大而無門澹泊而無毒一處  之以不得已焉則幾矣幾者幾于無我也  絶迹以下重發此義不行而絶迹則易行  而不踐地則難爲人使則有我故是僞爲  天使則無我故難僞夫知不以知如大之  行不以步鳥之飛不以翼者天使之也此  所謂虛也室虛則白生心虛則道集蓋非  有吉祥也而吉祥莫大焉人之安身栖志  釋此無歸矣而猶然不止非坐馳而何坐  馳如言陸沈之類蓋人心自止而橫執以  爲不止是猶之馬伏槽櫪而意騖千里即  拱默山林秪滋其擾耳夫耳目内通則無  聞見外于心知則無思爲如此則可以言  虛而鬼神來舍矣况于人乎此所以命萬  物之化而不化于物古聖人所爲服行終  身者也 葉涉公子高將使於齊問仲尼曰王使諸梁 也甚重齊之待使者蓋將甚敬而不急匹夫 猶未可動也而况諸侯乎吾甚慄之子嘗語 諸梁也曰凡事若小若大寡不道以懽成事 若不成則必有人道之患事若成則必有隂 陽之患若成若不成而後無患者唯有德者
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the essential teachings of the Daoist state of "selflessness" (wuji). Through the practice of "heart-fasting" (xinzhaï, a method of purifying the mind and reducing desires), Yan Hui (Confucius' disciple) suddenly realized: when one clings to the notion of "self," actions become constrained; whereas attaining a state of "selflessness" paradoxically brings freedom of movement.

Confucius praised Yan Hui for his profound insight and further instructed him: You must transcend worldly constraints and remain unmoved by empty reputation. Engage in conversation when others share your views, but remain silent when they differ. Cultivate a mind as open as a gateless courtyard and as pure as bland, non-toxic water. By following the natural course of events without forcing outcomes, you draw near to the state of "selflessness."

The text employs several metaphors to illustrate its point: stopping movement is easy, but moving without leaving traces is difficult; deliberately displaying the "self" is artificial contrivance, while aligning with spontaneity (ziran) is the Dao (the Way) of heaven. Just as the great roc flies without relying on footsteps and birds soar without conscious use of wings, these are manifestations of natural force. When the mind is empty, wisdom arises spontaneously; when the heart is clear, the Dao naturally gathers within. This is not the result of deliberate pursuit of auspiciousness—yet it is the greatest auspiciousness.

The latter part recounts the anxiety of Lord Ye Zigao before his diplomatic mission to Qi. Confucius cautioned him: Whether in great or small matters, forcing outcomes rarely leads to fulfillment. Failure invites real-world calamities, while success may conceal hidden imbalances of yin-yang. Only those who possess De (Virtue/Power) can remain unharmed in all circumstances. Here, the text reveals the Daoist wisdom of "governing through non-action" (wuwei), emphasizing a cultivated state of being that follows nature’s flow rather than striving artificially.

能之吾食也執粗而不臧爨無欲清之人今 吾朝受命而夕飲冰我其内熱與吾未至乎 事之情而既有隂陽之患矣事若不成必有 人道之患是兩也爲人臣者不足以任之子 其有以語我來仲尼曰天下有大戒二其一 命也其一義也子之愛親命也不可解於心 臣之事君義也無適而非君也無所逃於天 地之間是之謂大戒是以夫事其親者不擇 地而安之孝之至也夫事其君者不擇事而 安之忠之盛也自事其心者哀樂不易施乎 前知其不可奈何而安之若命德之至也爲 人臣子者固有所不得已行事之情而忘其 身何暇至於悅生而惡死夫子其行可矣丘 請復以所聞凡交近則必相靡以信遠則必 忠之以言言必或傳之夫傳兩喜兩怒之言 天下之難者也夫兩喜必多溢美之言兩怒 必多溢惡之言凡溢之類也妄妄則其信之 也莫莫則傳言者殃故法言曰傳其常情無 傳其溢言則幾乎全 郭註王使諸梁甚重者重其使欲有所求也  甚敬而不急者恐直空報其敬而不肯急  應其求也事無小大少有不言以成爲懽  者此仲尼之所曾告諸梁也事不成則有  人道之患者以成爲懽者不成則怒矣此  楚王之所不能免也事成則有隂陽之患  者言人患雖去然喜懼戰于胷中固已結  冰炭於五藏矣成敗若任之於彼而莫足
Interpretation

This passage comes from the Zhuangzi·Human World chapter, recounting how Confucius instructed his disciple Ye Gongzi Gao (Zhu Liang) on handling psychological dilemmas during diplomatic missions.

Ye Gongzi Gao, entrusted by the King of Chu with an important mission to Qi, was deeply troubled. Having received the mandate in the morning, he needed to drink ice water by evening to calm his inner agitation. His anxieties were twofold: failure would incur royal punishment (the calamity of human relations), while success might bring illness from emotional turbulence (the calamity of Yin-Yang imbalance).

Confucius revealed two fundamental principles of human existence: blood relations are ordained by Heaven's mandate, while a minister's service constitutes moral duty. A child's love for parents springs from innate nature, just as a vassal's service to his lord is inescapable responsibility. The truly filial can reassure their parents in any circumstance; the genuinely loyal can accept any assignment with equanimity. Those cultivating their inner nature should accept unchangeable situations as destiny—this represents supreme virtue (De). As an envoy, one must forget personal concerns upon receiving the mandate—how could there be leisure to ponder life or death?

Confucius further imparted diplomatic essentials: neighboring states require trust to maintain relations, while distant nations demand skillful communication. When conveying messages between rulers, extreme caution is necessary—during joy, words tend toward excessive praise; during anger, toward exaggerated condemnation. All hyperbolic statements lack reliability, and unreliable messages invite disaster. Hence the ancient saying: "Transmit only factual content, never embellished words"—this is how to preserve oneself.

Guo Xiang's commentary adds: The King of Chu's exceptionally grand send-off (indicating supreme importance) and courteous yet unhurried demeanor (showing respect without pressure) reflected diplomatic prudence. Confucius had previously warned Ye Gongzi Gao: in state affairs, whether major or minor, the slightest misstep can undo all merits. Failure naturally provokes the ruler's wrath—an inevitable reaction; success, however, brings alternating chills and feverish excitement akin to harboring both ice and burning coals in one's chest. Yet since outcomes ultimately depend on the other party, excessive worry is unnecessary.

 以患心者唯有德者能之爨無欲清之人  者對火而不思凉明其所饌儉薄也所饌  儉薄而内熱飲冰者誠憂事之難非美食  之爲也事未成則唯恐不成耳若果不成  則恐懼結於内而刑網罹於外故曰是兩  也不可解於心者自然固結不可解也無  所逃於天地之間者千人聚不以一人爲  主不亂則散故多賢不可以多君無賢不  可以無君此天人之道必至之宜也若君  可逃而親可解則不足戒也故曰是之謂  大戒知不可奈何者命也而安之則無哀  無樂何易施之有哉故冥然以所遇爲命  而不施心於其間泯然與至當爲一而無  休戚於其中雖事凡人猶無徃而不適而  况君親乎事有必至理固常通爲人臣子  者任之則事濟事濟而身不存者未之有  也又何用心於有身哉若乃信道不篤而  悅惡存懷不能與至當俱徃而謀生慮死  未見能成其事者也交近則必相靡以信  者近者得接故以其信驗親相靡服也遠  則必忠之以言者遥以言傳意也夫喜怒  之言若過其實傳之者宜使兩不失中故  未易也凡溢之類也妄言嫌非彼言以傳  者妄作也莫者莫然疑之也傳言者殃言  就傳過言似於誕妄受者有疑則傳言者  橫以輕重爲罪也引法言以證之言雖聞  臨時之過言而勿傳也必稱其常情而要  其誠致則近於全也
Interpretation

This passage expounds the wisdom of conducting oneself in society and facing destiny. Only those with true virtue (De) can maintain composure while inwardly anxious—like a chef who works by the stove without craving coolness, indicating the simplicity of his preparations. Those who eat plainly yet feel inner distress, needing ice water to soothe themselves, are actually worried about difficulties ahead rather than delicacies. Before completing a task, one fears failure; if failure occurs, the heart fills with dread while external punishment may follow. Such dual pressures form natural, inescapable knots within the mind, leaving no refuge between heaven and earth.

When people gather without leadership, chaos or dissolution ensues. Thus, even with many wise individuals, a ruler remains essential—this is the inevitable principle of heavenly Dao and human relations. If rulers could be avoided or familial bonds severed, such norms would cease to serve as guiding precepts. Recognizing certain inevitabilities as fate (ming) and accepting them calmly frees one from joy or sorrow—why force change? Therefore, one should peacefully accept all circumstances without artificial striving, harmonizing with the natural Dao, undisturbed by external matters. Even ordinary people can adapt everywhere this way—how much more so when serving rulers or parents?

Affairs follow inherent patterns. As ministers or children, fulfilling one’s duties ensures accomplishment. Those who succeed never fail to preserve themselves—why cling anxiously to self-preservation? If faith wavers, harboring preferences and aversions while resisting heaven’s Dao, obsessing over life and death daily, such individuals will struggle to achieve anything. In human interactions, closeness requires mutual influence through sincerity (cheng), while distance demands loyalty expressed through words. Exaggerated expressions of joy or anger, if distorted in transmission, should be reported neutrally—a difficult task. All hyperbolic speech risks falsification; reckless messengers invite listeners’ suspicion, and the bearer may incur blame for misjudged emphasis.

Quoting the sages as proof: Even upon hearing someone’s momentary extreme remarks, refrain from spreading them. By observing enduring principles and grasping authenticity, one approaches perfection.

筆乘葉公之憂在利害然害之極不過死亡  而已故夫子以生死决之忠孝人猶能言    自事其心者哀樂不易施乎前則未易言  也蓋事心則身忘身忘而哀樂無所錯矣  惡能施乎其前哉故卒之曰行事之情而  忘其身何暇至子悅生而惡死悅生惡死  即所謂哀樂者也知其無可奈何而安之  若命須溪云只此一語慷慨明達談笑有  餘夫不可奈何非衰颯之謂也其自决如  此 且以巧鬥力者始乎陽常卒乎隂泰至則多 竒巧以禮飲酒者始乎治常卒乎亂泰至則 多竒樂凡事亦然始乎諒常卒乎鄙其作始 也簡其將畢也必巨言者風波也行者實喪 也夫風波易以動實喪易以危故忿設無由 巧言偏辭獸死不擇音蔭氣息茀然於是並 生心厲尅核太至則必有不肖之心應之而 不知其然也苟爲不知其然也孰知其所終 故法言曰無遷令無勸成過度益也遷令勸 成殆事美成在久惡成不及改可不愼與且 夫乘物以遊心託不得已以養中至矣何作 爲報也莫若爲致命此其難者 郭註以巧鬥力者本共好戲欲勝情至潜興  害彼則不復循理也以禮飲酒者尊卑有  别旅酬有次湛湎淫液則淫流縱橫無所  不至也夫煩生於簡事起於微此必至之  勢也言者風波也故行之則實喪矣遺風  波而不行則實且喪矣事得其實則危可
Interpretation

Lord Ye of Chu (a high official during the Spring and Autumn period) only worried about worldly gains and losses, yet the greatest misfortune one could face is death. Confucius used the matter of life and death to awaken him: ordinary people may discuss the Dao of loyalty and filial piety, but those who truly cultivate their inner nature remain unmoved by sorrow or joy in any circumstance—this state is difficult to express in words. When one focuses on refining the heart-mind, the physical form is forgotten; once the form is forgotten, emotions like sorrow and joy find no foothold—how could external things still affect such a person? Thus it ultimately comes down to this: act according to your original nature while forgetting the self—where would there be room to cling to life and fear death? The very clinging to life and aversion to death are the roots of sorrow and joy. To understand the impermanence of life and death yet accept it peacefully—this is aligning with the Mandate of Heaven. Scholar Liu Chenweng (styled Xuxi) remarked that this single phrase alone reveals an enlightened and liberated attitude toward life.

The text then illustrates worldly patterns through metaphors: those who compete through skill begin with fair play but often end up resorting to underhanded tricks; drinking gatherings that commence with proper etiquette frequently descend into chaos. All affairs follow this pattern: initial sincerity gives way to mutual suspicion; what begins simply inevitably becomes complicated. Words are as changeable as wind and waves, while actions often bring tangible losses. Wind and waves easily stir situations, and tangible losses readily breed crises. Thus anger often arises without clear cause, and clever, extreme words resemble the death throes of beasts. When people's breathing becomes hurried and emotions agitated, wicked thoughts arise in their hearts. If one treats others with excessive harshness, it will inevitably provoke malicious retaliation—yet the perpetrator remains unaware of the reason. Being unaware of the cause, how could one foresee the outcome? Therefore the Fayan (Model Sayings) advises: "Do not arbitrarily alter commands; do not force success." Excess is like adding legs to a painted snake—both altering commands and forcing success ruin affairs. Good deeds require long accumulation, but once bad deeds take form, it's too late for correction—how could one not be cautious?

The supreme way of navigating life is to follow the natural course of things while maintaining inner freedom, using unavoidable circumstances to nurture the heart-mind. Rather than exhausting oneself calculating returns, it's better to fulfill one's fundamental duty—this is what's truly precious.

Guo Xiang's commentary adds: those competing through skill originally seek amusement, but the desire to win drives them to covert tricks; drinking according to ritual establishes hierarchy, yet intoxication leads to license. Disturbances arise from simplicity; great matters begin with subtleties—this is the inevitable tendency. Words are like wind and waves—acting upon them brings actual loss, but refusing to act for fear of wind and waves also causes loss. Only by grasping the essence of affairs can crises be resolved.

 安而蕩可定也夫忿怒之作無他由也常  由巧言過實偏辭失當譬之野獸蹴之窮  地意急情盡則和氣不至而氣息不理茀  然暴怒但生𤷅疵以對之也夫寬以容物  物必歸焉尅核太精則鄙吝心生而不自  覺也苟不自覺安能知禍福之所齊詣邪  故大人蕩然放物於自得之場不苦人之  能不竭人之歡故四海之交可全也無遷  令者傳彼實也無勸成者任其自成也過  度益也益則非任實矣美成者任其時化  譬之種植不可一朝成也若彼之所惡而  勸疆成之則悔敗尋至故曰惡成不及改  也乘物以遊心託不得已以養中言寄物  以爲意任理之必然者中庸之符全矣斯  接物之至也當任齊所報之實何爲爲齊  作意於其間哉莫若爲致命此其難者言  直爲致命最易而以喜怒施心故難也 筆乘夫傳兩喜兩怒之言而不敢溢者凡以  善終之難不得不謹其始耳觀鬥力者始  陽卒隂飲酒者始治卒亂則知人之相與  始于信卒乎鄙事之在人始于細卒乎大  者其必至也夫一言之發激怒于人非風  波乎人既激矣將行其怒非實喪乎故忿  之設也無由由巧言偏詞每每過實不擇  正理如獸之畏死不擇好音氣息茀然而  出則聽者並生厲心而忿從此設矣尅者  責人太切核者認眞太甚本以望人之美  也而人或以不肖之心應之于是而知止
Interpretation

When a person maintains inner tranquility, restless emotions naturally subside. The emergence of anger stems from nothing else but exaggerated words that distort truth or biased speech that violates reason. It resembles driving a wild beast into a corner—when it finds no escape, peaceful Qi dissipates, breathing becomes erratic, and sudden outbursts of rage only bring harm.

Treat others with generous tolerance, and they will naturally gravitate toward you. Excessive harshness breeds a miserly, unkind mentality without one's awareness. If even you remain oblivious to this mindset, how can you comprehend the principle that fortune and misfortune intertwine? Thus, those with profound cultivation always act with ease, allowing all things to find their proper place. They never demand what others cannot achieve nor exhaust others' joy—this is how they preserve harmonious relations with all under heaven.

Never arbitrarily alter others' genuine intentions, nor force outcomes against nature. Over-interference backfires; true accomplishment requires aligning with the tides of change. Just as crops cannot ripen in a single day, compelling others to accept what they detest swiftly invites failure and regret. Thus when harm takes form, it becomes too late for correction.

Let your mind wander freely with external phenomena while cultivating inner peace amidst unavoidable circumstances. Anchor your will in the natural patterns of development, surrendering completely to the inevitability of principle—this represents the highest realm of human conduct. Accept outcomes as they naturally unfold—why insist on artificial uniformity? Complete alignment with spontaneity proves most challenging, for people persistently interfere with their emotional biases.

Those who convey others' joys and angers without embellishment understand how rare it is to maintain integrity from start to finish, hence their necessary caution from the outset. Observe wrestlers beginning fiercely only to end exhausted, or drinkers commencing orderly but concluding in chaos, and you'll recognize how human interactions start with trust but decay into suspicion. Affairs invariably begin subtly before culminating in major upheavals—this is the inevitable pattern.

Doesn't a single improper word that provokes anger resemble stirring up waves? Once roused, humans must vent their fury—doesn't this create tangible loss? Thus anger never arises without cause; it frequently stems from clever, twisted words that exaggerate reality while disregarding proper principles, much like the death throes of a dying beast. When rage erupts suddenly, listeners instinctively resent it—thus anger takes form.

"Ke" (苛) means reproaching others too severely; "He" (核) implies scrutinizing too meticulously. Though one may intend others' improvement, they might respond with malice—this is when knowing when to stop becomes essential.

 焉可也而不知其然則積忿成患將不知  其所終矣終即前所謂卒乎鄙卒乎巨者  也君命之將卒意遷改事之未成勉强以  勸此即溢美溢惡之言故曰過度益也溢  則傳言者殃能無殆乎美成在久者成人  之美必優游深交久乃可入也惡成不及  改者一言僨事並生心厲悔將無及也夫  人喜爲溢言者意必存懷而不能虛焉故  耳乘物遊心則忘己託不得已則忘物斯  則因其命而致之我無心也何必有所作  爲以還報哉夫子告葉公或以爲次於顔  子而實亦不能外于虛也 顏闔將傅衛靈公太子而問於蘧伯玉曰有 人於此其德天殺與之爲無方則危吾國與 之爲有方則危吾身其知智適足以知人之 過而不知其所以過若然者吾柰之何蘧伯 玉曰善哉問乎戒之愼之正汝身哉形莫若 就心莫若和雖然之二者有患就不欲入和 不欲出形就而入且爲顛爲滅爲崩爲蹶心 和而出且爲聲爲名爲妖爲孽彼且爲嬰兒 亦與之爲嬰兒彼且爲無町畦亦與之爲無 町畦彼且爲無崖亦與之爲無崖達之入於 無疵汝不知夫螳螂乎怒其臂以當車轍不 知其不勝任也是其才之美者也戒之愼之 積伐而美者以犯之幾矣汝不知夫養虎者 乎不敢以生物與之爲其殺之之怒也不敢 以全物與之爲其决之之怒也時其饑飽達
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist principle of aligning with natural patterns and exercising prudence in conduct. When one fails to comprehend the Dao (the Way) of things yet insists on forcing outcomes, resentment accumulates into calamity, ultimately leading to irreparable consequences.

The text cites the example of Yan He, a virtuous scholar of the Spring and Autumn period preparing to tutor the crown prince of Duke Ling of Wei. Consulting the wise minister Qu Boyu, he expressed his dilemma: the prince's violent nature would endanger the state if left unchecked, yet strict discipline might jeopardize his own safety. Qu Boyu's profound advice was to maintain surface affability while preserving inner equilibrium, carefully balancing the measure. Excessive familiarity invites disaster, while undue candor courts trouble. One should adapt to the other's temperament like nurturing an infant—when they lack discipline, appear unrestrained with them; when they run wild, seem equally unfettered. Only through such subtle, traceless guidance can transformation occur.

Two vivid metaphors illustrate the perils of forcing outcomes: a mantis blocking a chariot wheel with its forelegs demonstrates laughable overreach, while tiger keepers avoid feeding live prey or whole carcasses lest they provoke the beast's ferocity. These exemplify the wisdom of assessing circumstances and exercising measured response. Ultimately, true wisdom lies in following natural patterns with a mind of Wuwei (non-action), neither straining for effect nor seeking reward.

其怒心虎之與人異類而媚養己者順也故 其殺者逆也夫愛馬者以筐盛成矢以蜄盛 溺(乃弔/切)適有蚊蝱僕縁而拊之不時則缺銜 毁首碎胷意有所至而愛有所亡可不愼邪 郭註夫小人之性引之軌制則憎己縱其無  度則亂邦不知民過之由己故罪責於民  而不自改也正汝身者反覆與會俱所以  爲正身也形莫若就心莫若和形不乖迕  和而不同也就不欲入就者形順入者還  與同也和不欲出和者義濟出者自顯伐  也若遂與同則是顛危而不扶持與彼俱  亡矣故當模格天地但不立小異耳自顯  和之且有含垢之聲濟彼之名彼將惡其  勝己妄生妖孽故當悶然若晦玄同光塵  然後不可得而親不可得而踈不可得而  利不可得而害也彼且爲嬰兒七句言不  小立圭角以逆其鱗也夫螳螂之怒臂非  不美也以當車轍顧非敵耳今知之所無  柰何而欲疆當其任即螳螂之怒臂也積  伐汝之才美以犯人此危殆之道故戒之  爲其殺之之怒者恐其因有殺心而遂怒  也爲其决之之怒者方使虎自齧分之則  因用力而怒矣時其饑飽達其怒心知其  所以怒而順之也順理則異類生愛逆節  則至親交兵此虎之所以媚於養己也矢  溺至賤而以寳器盛之愛馬之至也拊之  不時則缺銜毁首碎胷言雖救其患而掩
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here employs vivid analogies to illustrate the principle of conforming to nature in human interactions. He observes that though tigers belong to a different species, their keepers can live harmoniously with them by understanding their nature, whereas defying their temperament may provoke injury.

Consider the horse lover who uses exquisite bamboo baskets to collect manure and precious shells to catch urine. Yet when mosquitoes suddenly bite the horse, if the owner hastily swats at the wrong moment, the startled animal may snap its bit, break its halter, and tear its breastband. This shows how even good intentions can backfire through improper methods.

Guo Xiang (the Jin Dynasty commentator on Zhuangzi) supplements this teaching: The temperament of difficult people resembles this—excessive control breeds resentment, while unchecked indulgence invites chaos. Like rulers who blame their people for faults rooted in their own governance, one must first rectify oneself before correcting others. Maintain external flexibility while preserving internal principles.

While physically proximate, avoid complete assimilation; though inwardly kind, refrain from ostentatious displays. Total accommodation resembles failing to warn of impending danger—a path to mutual destruction. Emulate heaven and earth in embracing all things without contrived novelty. Those who constantly parade their superiority invite envy instead. The truly wise resemble undifferentiated primal light—neither approachable nor distant, neither corruptible nor harmable.

Later passages use infants to symbolize keeping one's edge concealed, and the mantis blocking a chariot to represent overestimating one's capacity. Accumulating skills only to provoke others courts disaster—like recognizing a tiger's murderous intent yet needlessly provoking it. In resolving conflicts, one must follow natural momentum. Accord with cosmic principles, and even alien species grow close; defy universal patterns, and blood relatives turn hostile. Herein lies why tiger tamers can domesticate fierce beasts. Using precious vessels for horse waste demonstrates extreme devotion, yet mistimed swatting harms the beloved—proving that goodwill alone proves insufficient without proper method.

 馬之不意故驚而至此也意有所至而愛  有所亡言欲至除患率然拊之以致毁碎  失其所以愛矣故當世接物逆順之際不  可不愼也 匠石之齊至乎曲轅見櫟櫪社樹其大蔽牛 絜之百圍其高臨山十仞而後有枝其可以 爲舟者旁十數觀者如巿匠石不顧遂行不 輟弟子厭觀之走及匠石曰自吾執斧斤以 隨夫子未嘗見材如此其美也先生不肯視 行不輟何邪曰己矣勿言之矣散上聲木也 以爲舟則沈以爲棺槨則速腐以爲器則速 毁以爲門户則液樠蔓以爲柱則蠹是不材 之木也無所可用故能若是之壽匠石歸櫟 社見夢曰汝將惡乎比予哉若將比予於文 木耶夫柤查梨橘柚果兩(亦果/切)之屬實熟則 剥則辱大枝折小枝泄此以其能苦其生者 也故不終其天年而中道夭自掊擊於世俗 者也物莫不若是且予求無所可用久矣幾 死乃今得之爲予大用使予也而有用且得 有此大也邪且也若與予也皆物也柰何哉 其相物也而幾死之散人又惡知散木匠石 覺教而診其夢弟子曰趣取無用則爲社何 邪曰宻若無言彼亦直寄焉以爲不知己者 詬厲也不爲社者且幾有翦乎且也彼其所 保與衆異而以義譽余之不亦遠乎 郭註不在可用之數曰散木可用之木爲文  木物莫不若是者物皆以用自傷也幾死
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here illustrates the profound principle of "the usefulness of the useless" through two parables.

The first story tells of a horse that, startled into a frenzied gallop, was patted and soothed by its loving master—only to be injured in the process. This shows that in human interactions, whether in favorable or adverse circumstances, one must act with caution.

The second story recounts how Carpenter Shi, while traveling through Quyuan in the state of Qi, came upon an enormous oak tree—a sacred "altar tree" worshipped as the embodiment of the earth god. Its canopy could shelter a thousand oxen, its trunk required a hundred men to encircle, its crown towered above the mountain peaks, and its branches could build over a dozen boats. A crowd gathered to marvel at it as if at a bustling market. Yet Carpenter Shi walked past without even glancing at it. His apprentice, catching up, asked, "Since I began learning from you, I've never seen such magnificent timber. Why didn't you even look at it?"

Carpenter Shi replied, "This is a 'useless tree'—good for nothing. Boats made from it would sink, coffins would rot swiftly, tools would break quickly, doors and windows would ooze resin, and pillars would be riddled with insects. Precisely because it's utterly useless, it has grown so vast and lived so long."

That night, the oak appeared to Carpenter Shi in a dream and said, "Do you compare me to those 'ornamental trees' prized for their usefulness? Fruit trees are plucked and beaten when ripe, their large branches snapped, their small ones torn away. All suffer for their utility, dying prematurely before reaching their natural lifespan. I've long sought uselessness—nearly being felled several times—until finally achieving this 'great usefulness' (preserving my life)."

Upon waking, Carpenter Shi told his apprentice of the dream. The apprentice asked, "If it strives to be useless, why does it serve as an altar tree?" Carpenter Shi explained, "It deliberately takes refuge in this role to avoid condemnation by those who misunderstand it. Even were it not an altar tree, it wouldn't escape the axe. Its way of preserving life is unconventional—judging it by ordinary standards misses the point."

Guo Xiang's commentary notes: So-called "useless trees" are those deemed unfit for use, while "ornamental trees" are valued for their utility. All things in the world bring harm upon themselves precisely because of their usefulness.

 乃今得之言數有睥睨己者唯今匠石明  之耳爲予也自言積無用乃爲濟生之大  用若有用久見伐矣幾死之散人又惡知  散木以戲匠石也弟子猶嫌其以爲社自  榮不趣取於無用而已匠石謂社自來寄  耳非此木求之爲社也以爲不知己者詬  厲言此本乃以社爲不知己而見辱病也  豈榮之哉本自以無用爲用雖不爲社亦  終不近於翦伐之害也所保與衆異者彼  以無保爲保而衆以有保爲保也利人長  物禁民爲非社之義也夫無用者泊然不  爲而群才自適用者各得其叙而不與焉  此無用之所以全也汝以社譽之無縁近  也 南伯子綦遊乎商之丘見大木焉有異結駟 千乘隱將芘庇其所籟賴子綦曰此何木也 哉此必有異材夫仰而視其細枝則拳曲而 不可以爲棟梁俯而視其大根則軸解而不 可以爲棺槨咶矢其葉則口爛而爲傷嗅之 則使人狂酲呈三日而不己子綦曰此果不 材之木也以至於此其大也嗟乎神人以此 不材宋有荆氏者宜揪栢桑其拱把而上者 求伹即之杙一者斬之三圍四圍求高名之 麗者斬之七圍八圍貴人富商之家求樿善 傍者斬之故未終其天年而中道夭於斧斤 此材之患也故解之以牛之白顙者與豚之 亢鼻者與人有痔病者不可以適河此皆巫 祝以知之矣所以爲不祥也此乃神人之所
Interpretation

This passage from the Zhuangzi·Human World chapter illustrates the profound philosophy of "the usefulness of the useless" through several parables.

In the story of Carpenter Shi (a renowned ancient woodworker), a large tree with soft, worthless wood escapes being felled precisely because of its uselessness, thereby preserving its life. When disciples suggest the tree gained honor by becoming an Earth Altar's sacred symbol, the carpenter points out it was preserved through inherent uselessness rather than actively seeking divine status. The tree's "uselessness as usefulness" demonstrates how rejecting worldly validation leads to true preservation.

When Nanbo Ziqi encounters a bizarre tree in Shangqiu, he notes its twisted branches can't serve as beams, its split trunk makes poor coffin wood, and its poisonous leaves induce madness. Precisely because it's utterly useless, the tree grows to enormous size. Zhuangzi observes that perfected beings (shenren) preserve themselves through this very "unworthiness."

The text contrasts this with trees from the Jing region of Song: catalpas, cypresses and mulberries—valued for their timber—get felled for mansion construction when mature, or perish young under axes. Similarly, sacrificial animals with white foreheads, upturned snouts, or humans with hemorrhoids are deemed inauspicious by shamans and thus spared ritual slaughter.

Through these examples, Zhuangzi reveals how worldly usefulness invites disaster, while apparent uselessness ensures preservation. The way of perfected beings lies in "preservation through non-preservation"—achieving natural protection without striving for it, unlike ordinary people's forced attempts at self-preservation. True uselessness allows all things to fulfill their nature while remaining transcendentally detached—this constitutes the Dao of complete living.

以爲大不祥也 郭註隱將芘其所籟者其枝所蔭可以隱芘  千乘也天王不材於百官故百官御其事  而明者爲之視聦者爲之聽知者爲之謀  勇者爲之捍夫何爲哉玄默而已而群材  不失其當則不材乃材之所至賴也故天  下樂推而不厭乘萬物而無害也白顙亢  鼻痔病巫祝解除棄此三者必妙選騂具  然後敢用巫祝於此亦知不材者全也夫  全生者天下之所謂祥也巫祝以不材爲  不祥而弗用也彼乃以不祥全生乃大祥  也神人者無心而順物者也故天下之所  謂大祥神人不逆 支離䟽者頤隱於齊肩高於頂會噲撮(子栝/切) 指天五管在上兩髀陛爲脇挫鍼治繲戒足 以餬口鼓莢播精足以食嗣十人上徴武士 則支離攘臂於其間上有大役則支離以有 常疾不受功上與病者粟則受三鍾與十束 薪夫支離其形者猶足以養其身終其天年 又况支離其德者乎 郭註徵武士則攘臂於其間者恃其無用故  不自竄匿也有大役則不受功者不任作  役故也役則不與賜則受之支離其形者  猶能自全如此神人無用於物而物各得  自用歸功名於群才與物冥而無迹故免  人間之害處常美之實此支離其德也 孔子適楚楚狂接輿遊其門曰鳳兮鳳兮何 如德之衰也來世不可持徃世不可追也天
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here elucidates the profound philosophy of "the usefulness of the useless" through several vivid parables.

The first story tells of a crooked, misshapen tree that escapes lumberjacks precisely because it's unfit for timber. Guo Xiang's commentary notes how seemingly useless branches actually provide shade for rulers of a thousand chariots. Like enlightened monarchs who don't flaunt abilities—letting officials perform their duties, the wise observe while the brave defend—the ruler maintains stillness. This very "uselessness" becomes the foundation for great achievements, which is why people willingly support such sovereigns.

Next comes the example of shamans selecting sacrificial animals: those with white foreheads, upturned snouts, or hemorrhoids were deemed inauspicious and rejected. But Zhuangzi points out these "unlucky" traits actually preserve the animals' lives, constituting true "great auspiciousness." The divine person (one who attains the Dao) doesn't interfere with things artificially but follows nature's course, thereby obtaining genuine good fortune.

Then we meet Zhi Li Shu, a severely deformed man—his chin buried in his navel, shoulders towering above his head, spine pointing skyward. Earning his living by mending clothes and sifting grain, he supports a household of ten. When conscription comes, he needn't hide; when corvée labor is demanded, he's exempt—even receiving government relief grain and firewood. Zhuangzi remarks: if a physically broken person can live out his natural lifespan, how much more so those who "fragment their De (virtue)" (conceal their moral excellence)? Guo Xiang explains such people avoid worldly calamities precisely through apparent uselessness, attaining true peace.

The chapter closes with the madman of Chu's song to Confucius: "Phoenix, phoenix! How has your De declined? The future can't be awaited, the past can't be pursued"—implying Confucius' worldly ambitions violate natural spontaneity. Throughout, the text demonstrates how seemingly useless, incomplete, or imperfect things often embody the wisdom of preserving life and harmonizing with heaven's Dao.

下有道聖人成焉天下無道聖人生焉方今 之時僅免刑焉福輕乎羽莫之知載禍重乎 地莫之知避已乎已乎臨人以德殆乎殆乎 畫地而趨迷陽迷陽無傷吾行吾行卻曲無 傷吾足山木自寇也膏火自煎也桂可食故 伐之漆可用故割之人皆知有用之用而莫 知無用之用也 郭註鳳兮鳳兮何如德之衰也言當順時直  前盡乎會通之宜世之哀盛蔑然不足覺  故曰何如來不可待徃不可追趣當盡臨  時之宜耳有道成焉無道生焉言付之自  爾而理自生成生成非我也豈爲治亂易  節哉治自求成故遺成而不敗亂自求生  故忘生而不死也方今之時僅免刑焉言  不瞻前顧後而盡當今之會冥然與時世  爲一而後妙當可全刑名可免也福輕乎  羽莫之知載者足能行而放之手能執而  任之聽耳之所聞視目之所見知止其所  不知能止其所不能用其自用爲其自爲  恣其性内而無纖芥於分外此無爲之至  易也無爲而性命不全者未之有也性命  全而非福者理未聞也故夫福者即向之  所謂全耳非假物也豈有寄鴻毛之重哉  率性而動動不過分天下之至易也舉其  自舉載其自載天下之至輕也然知以無  涯傷性心以欲惡蕩眞故乃釋此無爲之  至易而知彼有爲之至難棄夫自舉之至  輕而取夫載彼之至重此世之常患也禍
Interpretation

In an age when the world follows the Dao, sages can accomplish great deeds; in an age when the world turns away from the Dao, sages can only preserve their lives. In these times, avoiding punishment is already fortunate. Happiness is as light as a feather, yet people don't know how to carry it; calamity weighs heavier than the earth, yet people don't know how to avoid it. Enough, enough! To impose moral standards on others is perilous indeed! Perilous as drawing lines on the ground and demanding others walk them. Thorns grow thick, thick—don't obstruct my path; I tread winding trails—don't wound my feet.

Trees in the mountains are felled for their fine timber; fat is rendered because it burns. Cassia trees are cut for their edible bark; lacquer trees are tapped for their useful sap. The world knows the usefulness of the useful, but understands not the usefulness of the useless.

Guo Xiang (a Jin Dynasty Neo-Daoist philosopher) comments: "O phoenix, phoenix, how virtue has declined!" This speaks of adapting to circumstances, facing forward in complete harmony with the patterns of transformation. The subtle shifts between worldly prosperity and decline are hard to discern—thus the future cannot be awaited, the past cannot be pursued. The crux lies in seizing the present moment.

Achieving merit in orderly times and preserving life in chaotic times both stem from following nature's course. The generation and transformation of all things isn't dictated by human effort—how could their patterns change whether times are orderly or chaotic? In orderly times, merit naturally follows without deliberate pursuit; in chaotic times, life is naturally preserved without forced survival.

In this era, avoiding punishment is blessing enough. This means neither pining for the past nor longing for the future, but fully embracing the present opportunity to silently merge with the age—only thus can one preserve the subtle Dao and escape punishment. Happiness being feather-light yet people not knowing how to carry it means letting feet walk where they will, hands grasp what they may, ears hear what comes, eyes see what appears—knowing where to stop and where abilities end. Let the body function naturally, let all things follow their course, completely aligned with inherent nature without being burdened by external things—this is the highest realization of wuwei (non-action). Never has there been one who practiced wuwei yet failed to preserve life; nor does it accord with principle for life to be preserved yet happiness absent. What's called happiness here is precisely this "complete alignment with inherent nature"—not relying on external things, how could happiness be entrusted to something as light as a goose feather?

Following one's nature without overstepping inherent limits is the easiest thing under heaven; lifting what should be lifted, bearing what should be borne is the lightest burden in the world. Yet people constantly harm their innate nature through endless pursuits, letting desires and aversions disturb their authentic being. They abandon this supremely simple way of wuwei to chase after the most difficult paths of forced action; discard this supremely light method of self-sustenance to shoulder the heaviest burdens of external things—this is the common failing of worldly people.

 重乎地莫之知避者舉其性内則雖負萬  鈞而不覺其重也外物寄之雖重不盈錙  銖有不勝任者矣爲内福也故福至輕爲  外禍也故禍至重禍重而莫之知避此世  之大迷也夫畫地而使人循之其卒不可  䄋矣有其己而臨物與物不冥矣故大人  不明我以耀彼而任彼之自明不德我以  臨人而付人之自得故能彌貫萬物而玄  同彼我泯然與天下爲一而内外同福也  迷陽猶亡陽也亡陽任獨不蕩於外則吾  行全矣天下皆全其吾則凡稱吾者莫不  皆全也吾行郤曲無傷吾足者曲成其行  各自足矣有用則與彼爲功無用則自全  其生夫割肌膚以爲天下者天下之所知  也使百姓不失其自全而彼我俱適者俛  然不覺妙之在身也 筆乘吾行郤曲當從碧虛作郤曲郤曲無傷  吾足庶與上文相恊蓋由傳寫者誤疊吾  行二字耳迷陽勉道曰蕨也蕨生蒙宻能  迷陽明之路故曰迷陽託興言之也其說  甚異存之以廣異聞 筆乘緫論上彰云養生主是出世法人間世  是住世法余謂出世而後能住世老子所  謂執古之道以御今之有也   德充符第五 魯有兀者王駘從之遊者與仲尼相若常季 問於仲尼曰王駘兀者也從之遊者與夫子 中分魯立不教坐不議虛而徃實而歸固有 不言之教無形而心成者邪是何人也仲尼
Interpretation

This passage contains profound insights from the Zhuangzi regarding worldly philosophy and inner cultivation, presented through several allegorical stories.

The first part discusses the importance of inner cultivation. When one focuses on their intrinsic nature, even carrying a tremendous burden feels weightless; yet when overly concerned with external matters, the lightest things become unbearable. True blessings originate from within, hence they appear light, while misfortunes stem from external attachments, making them feel heavy. Most people fail to comprehend this principle—like drawing lines on the ground for others to follow, such efforts ultimately prove unsustainable. The truly cultivated person does not deliberately display themselves to influence others but allows all things to manifest their nature naturally. In this way, one merges with all existence, achieving harmony between inner and outer realms.

The second part uses the metaphor of "mi yang" (referring to ferns) to illustrate the importance of maintaining independence. Just as dense ferns block sunlight, excessive pursuit of external things obscures one's true nature. Only by preserving inner wholeness can one coexist harmoniously with all things. When useful, one contributes; when not, one preserves themselves. Forcing changes to conform to worldly expectations is far less natural than allowing people to find their rightful place.

The third section presents two annotations. The "Bi Cheng" commentary notes possible transcription errors in the text and explains that "mi yang" refers to ferns, named for their dense growth that blocks sunlight. The "Bi Cheng General Discussion" observes that "Yang Sheng Zhu" (The Fundamentals of Nurturing Life) addresses methods of withdrawal from the world, while "Ren Jian Shi" (The Human World) deals with engagement in worldly affairs—the two complement each other, echoing Laozi's teaching to "hold fast to the ancient Dao to govern present existence."

Finally, the opening of "De Chong Fu" (The Sign of Virtue Complete) recounts the story of Wang Tai of Lu, a man whose feet had been amputated yet whose disciples were as numerous as Confucius's. Chang Ji asked Confucius: "Wang Tai is physically impaired, yet he attracts so many followers. Without speaking or teaching, his students return fulfilled. Is this not the realm of 'teaching without words, achieving heart-mind transformation without form'? What manner of man is this?"

曰夫子聖人也丘也直後而未徃耳丘將以 爲師而况不若丘者乎奚假魯國丘將引天 下而與從之常季曰彼兀者也而王昭先生 其與庸亦遠矣若然者其用心也獨若之何 仲尼曰死生亦大矣而不得與之變雖天地 覆墜亦將不與之遺審乎無假而不與物遷 命物之化而守其宗也常季曰何謂也仲尼 曰自其異者視之肝膽楚越也自其同者視 之萬物皆一也夫若然者且不知耳目之所 宜而遊心乎德之和物視其所一而不見其 所喪視喪其足猶遺土也常季曰彼爲己以 其知得其心以其心得其常心物何爲最之 哉仲尼曰人莫鑑於流水而鑑於止水唯止 能止衆止受命於地唯松栢獨也在冬夏青 青受命於天唯舜獨也正幸能正生乃正衆 生夫保始之徴不懼之實勇士一人雄入於 九軍將求名而能自要者而猶若是而况官 天地府萬物直寓六骸象耳目一知之所知 而心未常死者乎彼且擇日而登假人則從 是也彼且何肯以物爲事乎 郭註虛徃實歸各自得而足也無形而心成  者怪其形殘而心乃充足也夫心之全也  遺身形忘五藏忽然獨徃而天下莫能離  也奚假魯國將引天下與從之言神全心  具則體與物冥與物冥者天下之所不能  遠奚但一國而已哉死生之變化於天也  彼與變俱故生死不變於彼雖天地覆墜
Interpretation

Confucius said of Master Wang Tai that he was a sage, and though I, Kong Qiu, have not yet been able to follow him, I intend to take him as my teacher—how much more should those less accomplished than I? Not just the state of Lu, I would lead all under heaven to follow him. Chang Ji asked: "He is a man who has lost a foot, yet Master Wang Tai transcends so completely—he is vastly different from ordinary people. How does such a man's inner workings function?"

Confucius replied: "Life and death are the greatest matters of human existence, yet they cannot alter him; even if heaven collapsed and earth split asunder, he would not perish with them. Having comprehended the eternal and unchanging truth, he does not shift with external things, but preserves the root while accommodating all transformations." Chang Ji pressed further, asking what this meant.

Confucius explained: "Viewed from the perspective of difference, the liver and gallbladder are as distant as the states of Chu and Yue; but seen from the perspective of unity, all things are one. One who attains this state pays no heed to the preferences of ears and eyes, but lets his spirit wander in the harmonious realm of Dao and De (Virtue). He perceives only the fundamental unity of all things, oblivious to their deficiencies—regarding his lost foot as casually as discarded earth."

Chang Ji continued: "By cultivating himself, he uses wisdom to grasp the original mind, and through this attains the constant mind. How can external things affect him?" Confucius said: "People do not mirror themselves in flowing water, but in still water. Only when one is still can one still the multitude. Just as pine and cypress, receiving earth's Qi (vital energy), alone remain verdant through winter and summer; just as Shun, receiving heaven's mandate, rectified himself and thereby rectified the people. Those who preserve their original mind possess true fearlessness. A brave warrior dares charge alone into an army of thousands—if even those who discipline themselves for fame can do this, how much more so one who governs heaven and earth, embraces all things, regards the body as a temporary lodging, treats ears and eyes as mere symbols, whose understanding penetrates all and whose spirit never dies? He will choose an auspicious day to transcend the mundane world, and people will naturally follow. How could such a man be concerned with worldly trivialities?"

Guo Xiang's commentary notes: "The empty-minded go forth yet return fulfilled, each obtaining what they seek. Without complete form yet accomplishing the mind, seemingly physically incomplete yet spiritually whole. Those with complete spirits forget physical form, transcend the constraints of the five viscera, and move freely beyond all things under heaven without deviation. Not just Lu—he would lead all under heaven to follow. Those whose essence-spirit (Jing-Shen) is complete unite with all things—how could such influence be limited to one state? The transformations of life and death follow nature's patterns—he moves with these changes, thus life and death cannot alter his fundamental nature; even heaven's collapse and earth's upheaval cannot affect him."

 斯順之也審乎無假者明性命之固當也  不與物遷者任物之自遷也命物之化者  以化爲命而無乖迕也守其宗者不離至  當之極也異而肝膽楚越者恬苦之性殊  則美惡之情背也同而萬物皆一者雖所  美不同而同有所美各美其所美則萬物  一美也各是其所是則天下一是也夫因  其所異而異之則天下莫不異而浩然大  觀者官天地府萬物知異之不足異故因  其所同而同之則天下莫不皆同又知同  之不足有故因其所無而無之則是非美  惡莫不皆無矣夫是我而非彼美己而惡  人自中知以下至於昆虫莫不能然然此  明乎我而不明乎彼者爾若夫玄通泯合  之士因天下以明天下天下無曰莫非也  即明天下之無非無曰彼是也即明天下  之無是無是無非混而爲一故能乘變任  化忤物而不慴也不知耳目之所宜而逰  心乎德之和者宜生於不宜者也無美無  惡則無不宜故亡其宜也都亡宜故無不  任都任之而不得者未之有也無不得而  不和者亦未聞也故放心於天地之間蕩  然無不當而擴然無不適也物視其所一  而不見其所喪言體夫極數之妙心故能  無物而不同無物而不同則死生變化無  徃而非我矣故生爲我時死爲我順時爲  我聚順爲我散聚散雖異而我皆我之則  生故我耳未始有得死亦我也未始有喪
Interpretation

This passage conveys the Daoist wisdom of perceiving the world. Those who truly comprehend the Dao understand that all things in their natural state are inherently reasonable. They don't forcibly alter things, but allow them to transform spontaneously; they follow the evolutionary patterns of all beings, harmoniously coexisting with creation.

Those who maintain this fundamental awareness always grasp the most appropriate principles. Just as the liver and gallbladder, though both internal organs, have different functions; just as bitter and sweet tastes are entirely distinct; just as people's judgments of beauty and ugliness vary—yet if one understands that all things, though diverse in form, share the same essence, they'll discover: every phenomenon possesses its unique beauty, every perspective holds its validity. If we focus solely on differences, all things under heaven appear distinct; but viewed from the macrocosmic perspective, heaven and earth and the myriad things are fundamentally one, their differences insignificant.

Truly enlightened individuals aren't trapped by distinctions between right/wrong or beautiful/ugly. Ordinary people constantly affirm themselves while negating others—from wise men to insects, this tendency exists—but this represents partial understanding. The sage who truly comprehends the Dao understands the world through the world itself, neither affirming nor negating. They realize there's no absolute right or wrong, that all blends into oneness, thus they can follow transformations and face external phenomena without fear.

Such people aren't confined by sensory limitations—their spirits wander freely within the harmony of the Dao. Without distinctions between beauty and ugliness, nothing becomes inappropriate. Releasing all preconceptions allows complete inclusion. When the mind fully expands, stretching freely between heaven and earth, one feels at ease everywhere. They perceive the essential unity of all things, unconcerned with superficial gains and losses.

Having realized this ultimate wisdom, one becomes interconnected with all existence. Life and death transformations all become part of "me"—living represents my timely opportunity, dying my natural compliance; gathering is my convergence, parting my dispersion. Whether gathering or parting, living or dying, I remain fundamentally myself—birth doesn't bring gain, death doesn't entail loss.

 夫死生之變猶以爲一既觀其一則說然  無係玄同彼我以生死爲寤寐以形骸爲  逆旅去生如脫屣斷足如遺土吾未見足  以纓茀其心也彼爲己以其知者嫌王駘  未能忘知而自存也得其心以其心者嫌  未能遺心而自得也得其常心物何爲最  之者夫得其常心平徃者也嫌其不能平  徃而與物過常故使物就之也夫止水之  致鑑者非爲止以求鑑也故王駘之聚衆  衆自歸之豈引物使從己哉唯止能止衆  止者動而爲之則不能居衆物之止也唯  舜獨也正言特受自然之正氣者至希也  下首則唯爲松栢上首則唯有聖人故凡  不正者皆來求正耳若物皆有青全則無  貴於松栢人各自正則無美於大聖而趣  之也幸能正生以正衆生者幸自能正耳  非爲正以正之也將求名而能自要者非  能遺名而無不任也官天地府萬物者冥  然無不體也直寓六骸者所謂逆旅也象  耳目者人用耳目亦用耳目非須耳目也  知與變化俱則無徃而不冥此知之一者  也心與死生順則無時而非生此心之未  嘗死也擇日而登假者以不失會爲擇耳  斯人無擇也在其天行而時動者也故假  借之人由此而最之耳其恬漠故全也故  曰彼且何肯以物爲事 筆乘受命于地至唯舜獨也正文句不齊似  有脫畧張君房校本作受命于地唯松栢
Interpretation

The transformations of life and death are ultimately one—understanding this principle allows transcendence and liberation. When a person merges with the supreme Dao (xuántóng refers to the highest state of the Way), the distinction between self and external phenomena dissolves. They regard life and death as natural as the alternation of day and night, viewing their body as merely temporary lodging. Abandoning life becomes like discarding old shoes; severing a limb like shaking off mud—how could such a person remain entangled in worldly attachments?

Those who stubbornly rely on intellectual cleverness for self-cultivation resemble Wang Tai (the legendary sage with physical disabilities)—though advanced, they haven't yet reached the perfection of "forgetting wisdom." Those who deliberately cultivate the mind haven't attained the state of "attainment through no-mind." Those who have realized the eternal true heart remain unmoved by the myriad phenomena. Ordinary people seek Wang Tai precisely because they cannot maintain equanimity in interacting with all things.

Like still water that naturally reflects images without conscious intent, Wang Tai's attraction of multitudes wasn't through deliberate recruitment. Only by maintaining inner stillness can one become the axis others revolve around—conscious effort would instead repel the myriad things. Sages like Shun (who received zhèngqì from nature, indicating extraordinary endowment) are as rare as pine and cypress standing tallest among trees. That all things yearn for uprightness reveals their inherent incompleteness. Were all things perfect, pines wouldn't stand out; were everyone upright, sages wouldn't be followed.

Those who truly rectify their own lives naturally influence others without conscious intention. Fame-seekers cannot forget reputation, while those united with heaven, earth and the myriad things regard even their bodies as temporary lodgings. Using ears and eyes without being bound by them, their awareness renews with each transformation—such wisdom never rigidifies. A mind flowing with life and death ensures vitality never exhausts. So-called "auspicious days for ascension" mean nothing to Dao-realized beings—they already move with celestial patterns. This explains why figures like Wang Tai are most precious: their serene wúwéi (non-action) makes deliberate interference impossible.

(Note: The passage "Receiving earth's mandate, only pines and cypresses..." has textual variants suggesting possible scribal omissions. Zhang Junfang's annotated edition interprets both pines and sages as exceptional beings endowed with heaven-and-earth's zhèngqì.)

 獨也正在冬夏青青受命于天唯堯舜獨  也正在萬物之首補亡七字因郭註有下  首唯松栢上首唯聖人故也今以松栢獨  也在舜獨也正爲句亦自文順而義全矣 申徒嘉兀者也而與鄭子產同師於伯昏無 人子産謂申徒嘉曰我先出則子止子先出 則我止其明日又與合堂同席而坐子産謂 申徒嘉曰我先出則子止子先出則我止今 我將出子可以止乎其未耶且子見執政而 不違子齊執政乎申徒嘉曰先生之門固有 執政焉如此哉子而說悅子之執政而後人 見者也聞之曰鑑明則塵垢不止止則不明 也久與賢人處則無過今子之所取大者先 生也而猶出言若是不亦過乎子產曰子既 若是矣猶與堯爭善計子之德不足以自反 邪申徒嘉曰自狀其過以不當亡者衆不狀 其過以不當存者寡知不可柰何而安之若 命唯有德者能之遊於羿之彀中中央者中 壯地也然而不中者命也人以其全足笑吾 不全足者衆矣我怫然而怒而適先生之所 則廢然不反不知先生之洗我以善邪吾與 夫子遊十九年矣而未嘗知吾兀者也今子 與我遊於形骸之内而子索我於形骸之外 不亦過乎子產蹵(子六/切)然改容更貌曰子無 乃稱 郭註我出子止羞與刖者常行也其明日又  質而問之欲使必不並己也子齊執政者
Interpretation

This passage comes from the Zhuangzi·De Chong Fu (The Sign of Virtue Complete), depicting a dialogue between Zichan, the chief minister of Zheng State, and Shentu Jia, a man with amputated feet. It reveals Zhuangzi's contemplation on the relationship between De (Virtue/Power) and physical form.

Both Zichan and Shentu Jia were students of Bohun Wuren (a fictional Daoist sage created by Zhuangzi). As a high-ranking official, Zichan felt it beneath his dignity to associate with a disabled person. He told Shentu Jia: "If I go out first, you wait; if you go out first, I'll wait." The next day in class, Zichan repeated this demand and challenged: "As the chief minister, shouldn't you defer to me?"

Shentu Jia retorted: "At our master's school, how could there be someone who cares about official rank? Haven't you heard? A bright mirror gathers no dust; a dusty mirror isn't bright. Those who keep company with sages make no mistakes. Now you're studying with our master yet speak like this—isn't this going too far?"

An embarrassed Zichan snapped: "With your disability, how dare you compare your virtue to Emperor Yao's?" Calmly Shentu Jia responded: "Many justify their faults thinking they don't deserve punishment; few admit their faults accepting deserved punishment. Only those with true De can accept inevitable fate with equanimity. It's like standing within the target range of the divine archer Yi—not getting hit is pure luck. People often mocked my disability, but since studying with our master, I've completely forgotten it. For nineteen years, our master never treated me as disabled. Now you study alongside me yet judge by appearances—isn't this shallow?"

Hearing this, Zichan felt ashamed and changed his attitude. Guo Xiang (a Jin Dynasty commentator) notes that Zichan initially avoided walking with a disabled person, then deliberately questioned Shentu Jia the next day to assert superiority. His statement "I'm the chief minister" emphasized his official status. Through this contrast, the dialogue illustrates how true De transcends physical imperfections—those who attain the Dao value inner cultivation over outward appearance.

 常以執政自多故直云子齊執政便謂足  以明其不遜也先生之門固有執政焉如  此哉言此論德之處非計位也而說子之  執政而後人者笑其矜說在位欲處物先  也久與賢人處則無過言其事明師而鄙  吝之心猶未去乃眞過也若是形殘也言  不自顧省而欲輕蔑在位與有德者並計  子之德故不足以補形殘之過多自陳其  過狀以己爲不當亡者衆也默然知過自  以爲應死者少也羿古之善射者于矢所  及爲彀中夫利害相攻則天下皆羿也自  不遺身忘知與物同波者皆游於羿之彀  中耳雖張毅之出單豹之處猶未免於中  地則中與不中唯在命耳而區區者各有  其所遇而不知命之自耳故免乎于矢之  害者自以爲巧欣然多已及至不免則自  恨其謬而志傷神辱斯未能達命之情者  也夫我之生也非我之所生也則一生之  内百年之中其坐起行止動靜趣舍性情  知能與凡所有者凡所無者凡所爲者凡  所遇者皆非我也理自爾耳而横生休戚  乎其中斯又逆自然而失者也人以其全  足笑吾不全足者皆不知命而有斯笑也  怫然而怒者見其不知命而怒斯又未知  命也廢然而反者見至人之知命遺形故  廢向者之怒而復常也不知先生之洗我  以善者言不知先生洗我以善道故耶我  爲能自反耶斯自忘形而遣累也十九年
Interpretation

This passage expounds profound insights on how to perceive fate and personal imperfections. It states that those who become arrogant upon attaining official positions are merely flaunting status rather than true virtue (De). Genuine cultivators never measure worth by rank—those who constantly parade their titles to dominate others reveal their own shallowness.

Though prolonged association with sages may reduce faults, harboring contempt in one's heart remains the gravest transgression. Consider those with physical disabilities: if they scorn virtuous individuals instead of self-reflecting, such moral flaws prove far more crippling than bodily limitations. Most people rationalize their shortcomings; few quietly acknowledge their errors.

Like Hou Yi (the legendary archer) whose arrows never missed their mark, worldly people chasing profit and advantage live as if trapped on a target. Even recluses like Zhang Yi and Shan Bao couldn't escape destiny's arrangements. Humans pride themselves on avoiding misfortune through skill, yet lament when inevitable calamity strikes—this reveals their failure to comprehend fate's essence.

In truth, from birth to death, every word, deed, gain, or loss follows natural laws beyond complete human control. Forcing joy or sorrow upon these events violates nature's way. Those who mock my physical imperfections misunderstand destiny's truth. My initial anger showed my own lack of wisdom; its dissipation came through realizing the Daoist sage's insight—seeing through fate and transcending form.

Finally, though I've followed my master for nineteen years, I cannot tell whether his virtuous teachings cleansed me or I awakened myself. This very uncertainty marks the realm where physical form is forgotten and worldly burdens cast away.

 而未嘗知吾兀者忘形故也形骸外矣其  德内也今子與我德游耳非與我形交而  索我外好豈不過哉子無乃稱者己悟則  厭其多言也 魯有兀者叔山無趾踵見仲尼仲尼曰子不 謹前既犯患若是矣雖今來何及矣無趾曰 吾唯不知務而輕用吾身吾是以亡足今吾 來也猶有尊足者存吾是以務全之也夫天 無不覆地無不載吾以夫子爲天地安知夫 子之猶若是也孔子曰丘則陋矣夫子胡不 入乎請講以所聞無趾出孔子曰弟子勉之 夫無趾兀者也猶務學以復補前行之惡而 况全德之人乎無趾語老聃曰孔丘之於至 人其未邪彼何寳寳以學子爲彼且蘄以諔 (尺叔/切)詭幻怪之名聞不知至人之以是爲己 桎梏邪老聃曰胡不直使彼以死生爲一條 以可不可爲一貫者解其桎梏其可乎無趾 曰天刑之安可解 郭註踵頻也人之生也理自生矣直莫之爲  而任其自生斯重其身而知務者也若乃  忘其自生謹而矜之斯輕用其身而不知  務也故五臟相攻於内而手足殘傷於外  也猶有尊足者存言刖一足未足以虧其  德明夫形骸者逆旅也去其矜謹任其自  生斯務全也夫天不爲覆故能常覆地不  爲載故能常載使天地而爲覆載則有時  而息矣使舟能沉而爲人浮則有時而没  矣故物爲焉則未足以終其生也安知夫
Interpretation

In the state of Lu, there was a man named Shushan Wuzhi (Toeless) who had lost his toes. He walked on his heels to visit Confucius. Confucius said, "You were imprudent before and suffered this misfortune. What use is coming to me now?" Wuzhi replied, "It was precisely because I didn't understand the Dao of conduct and treated my body carelessly that I lost my toes. Now I come to you because there are things more precious than feet (referring to moral cultivation) that I strive to preserve. Heaven covers all things without exception, Earth bears all things without exception—I regarded you as Heaven and Earth, never imagining you'd be like this."

Hearing this, Confucius said, "I've been shallow. Won't you come in, sir? Please share your insights." After Wuzhi left, Confucius told his disciples, "Strive diligently! Wuzhi is physically impaired yet seeks learning to amend past faults—how much more should those with whole bodies?"

Later, Wuzhi said to Laozi (Lao Dan), "I fear Confucius hasn't yet attained the state of the Perfected Person (Zhiren). Why does he bustle about seeking to learn from you? He pursues strange and extraordinary reputation, not realizing the Perfected consider these as shackles binding oneself." Laozi replied, "Why not directly tell him: regard life and death as one, view the permissible and impermissible as interconnected—this would release his fetters." Wuzhi answered, "This is Heaven's punishment upon him—how could it be undone?"

Guo Xiang's commentary explains: The heels symbolize excessive striving. Human life should follow natural growth—avoid deliberate action (Wuwei) and let things develop spontaneously. This is how one values life and understands fundamentals. Forgetting life's natural disposition while being overly cautious actually leads to bodily neglect and fundamental ignorance. Thus internal organ conflicts manifest as external limb injuries. "Things more precious than feet" means losing a toe doesn't impair one's virtue (De). Understand the body as a temporary lodging—discard restraint and let nature take its course for true preservation. Heaven covers eternally precisely by not deliberately covering; Earth bears perpetually precisely by not deliberately bearing. If Heaven and Earth acted deliberately, there would be cessation. If boats deliberately sank and men deliberately floated, drowning would follow. Therefore, deliberate actions cannot endure.

 子之猶若是者責其不謹不及天地也無  趾出聞所聞而出全其無爲也彼何賔賔  以學子爲者怪其方復學於老聃也夫無  心者人學亦學然古之學者爲己今之學  者爲人其弊也遂至乎爲人之所爲矣夫  師人以自得者率其常然者也舍己效人  而逐物於外者求乎非常之名者也夫非  常之名乃常之所生也故學者非爲幻怪  也幻怪之生必由於學禮者非爲華薄也  而華薄之興必由於禮斯必然之理至人  之所無柰何故以爲己之桎梏也胡不直  使彼以死生爲一條以可不可爲一貫者  解其桎梏欲以直理冥之冀其無迹也天  刑之安可解者仲尼非不冥也顧自然之  理行則影從言則嚮隨夫順物則名迹斯  立而順物者非爲名也非爲名則至矣而  終不免乎名則孰能解之哉故名者影嚮  也影嚮者形聲之桎梏也明斯理也則名  迹可遺而性命可全矣 魯哀公問于仲尼曰衛有惡人焉曰哀駘它 沱丈夫與之處者思而不能去也婦人見之 請於父母曰與人爲妻寧爲夫子妾者十數 而未止也未嘗有聞其唱者也常和而已矣 無君人之位以濟乎人之死無聚禄以望人 之腹又以惡駭天下和而不唱知不出乎四 域且而雌雄合乎前是必有異乎人者也寡 人召而觀之果以惡駭天下與寡人處不至
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here explores the essence of learning and the constraints of reputation through several parables.

The man who reproaches himself for lacking caution and failing to match Heaven and Earth is like one who insists on walking despite severed toes. Those who truly comprehend the Dao maintain a state of natural Wuwei (non-action) - why deliberately imitate others? The unattached learner, even when following a teacher, preserves his authentic nature. The ancients studied to cultivate themselves, while modern people study for others' approval - this distortion turns people into reflections of others' expectations.

Those who follow teachers yet retain their true selves abide by nature's constant way; those who abandon themselves to mimic others and chase external things merely pursue empty fame. Such reputation is precisely what worldly conventions produce. Genuine learning isn't about seeking the extraordinary, yet extraordinary phenomena often stem from forced study; ritual wasn't meant for ostentation, yet pretentiousness frequently arises from it. This inevitable pattern even the sages couldn't alter, regarding such constraints as shackles.

Why not help people understand that life and death are ultimately one, that permissible and impermissible share no real distinction, thereby loosening these mental bonds? Though we might wish to awaken people directly with truth, how easily can inborn constraints be removed? Confucius wasn't ignorant of this principle - it's simply nature's way: walking creates shadows, speaking produces echoes. Accommodating external things leaves traces of reputation, yet true accommodation seeks no fame. The highest attainment is precisely not pursuing fame, yet ultimately one still acquires it - who can escape? Thus reputation becomes like shadows and echoes: fetters to our physical forms. Only by understanding this can we transcend reputation's constraints and preserve our heavenly nature.

Duke Ai of Lu asked Confucius: "In Wei there's an ugly man named Aitai Tuo. Men who associate with him won't leave his company; women who meet him beg their parents, 'I'd rather be his concubine than another man's wife' - over a dozen such cases exist. He never initiates anything, merely responds harmoniously. Without a ruler's authority he saves people from distress; without ample salary he fills others' bellies; hideously ugly yet the world submits to him; gentle without self-display, his wisdom never exceeds the mundane, yet men and women alike feel drawn to him. This man must possess something extraordinary." After summoning him, I found him truly ugly, yet within a month discerned his remarkable qualities.

以月數而寡人有意乎其爲人也不至乎期 年而寡人信之國無宰而寡人傳國焉悶門 然而後應汜泛而若辭寡人醜乎卒授之國 無幾何也去寡人而行寡人恤焉若有亡也 若無與樂是國也是何人者也仲尼曰丘也 嘗使於楚矣適見㹠子食嗣於其死母者少 焉眴舜若皆棄之而走不見己焉爾不得類 焉爾所愛其母者非愛其形也愛使其形者 也城而死者其人之葬也不以翣(色治/切)資刖 者之屨無爲愛之皆無其本矣爲天子之諸 御不爪翦不穿耳取妻者止於外不得復使 形全猶足以爲爾而况全德之人乎今哀駘 它未言而信無功而親使人授己國唯恐其 不受也是必才全而德不形者也哀公曰何 謂才全仲尼曰死生存亡窮達貧富賢與不 肖毁譽余饑渴寒暑是事之變命之行也日 夜相代乎前而知不能規乎其始者也故不 足以滑骨和不可入於靈府使之和豫通而 不失於兊使日夜無卻隙而與物爲春是接 而生時於心者也是之謂才全何謂德不形 曰平者水停之盛也其可以爲法也内保之 而外不蕩也德者成和之脩也德不形者物 不能離也哀公異日以告閔子曰始也吾以 南面而君天下執民之紀而憂其死吾自以 爲至通矣今吾聞至人之言恐吾無其實輕 用吾身而亡吾國吾與孔丘非君臣也德友 而已矣
Interpretation

This passage recounts a dialogue between Duke Ai of Lu and Confucius regarding the concept of "perfect talent with invisible virtue (De)."

Duke Ai spoke of a man named Aitai Tuo who, within less than a year of acquaintance, had gained his complete trust—so much so that the duke considered entrusting him with the governance of the state. Yet this man suddenly departed, leaving the duke disconsolate. Confucius explained through several metaphors: Piglets flee in terror upon discovering their dead mother, for what they love is not the physical form but the vital essence (Jing); fallen soldiers need no ornate coffins, just as amputees require no shoes, since their fundamental substance is lost. These examples illustrate that true value lies in inner essence rather than external appearance.

Confucius pointed out that Aitai Tuo's ability to inspire voluntary entrustment of state affairs stemmed from his achievement of "perfect talent with invisible virtue"—complete capability that remains unmanifested. "Perfect talent" refers to maintaining equanimity toward life's vicissitudes—birth and death, poverty and wealth, praise and blame—while preserving inner tranquility. "Invisible virtue" resembles still water that perfectly reflects objects: profound inner cultivation that remains outwardly unassuming, yet naturally attracts all things to adhere to it.

Finally, Duke Ai told Minzi that after hearing these teachings, he realized his previous belief that governing people as a ruler constituted true understanding. Now he recognized that his relationship with Confucius had transcended the ruler-minister dynamic, becoming a friendship founded on shared virtue (De). This reveals the Daoist ideal of governance: true leadership does not rely on power or status but naturally transforms others through complete virtue that remains unforced—embodying the principle of Wuwei (non-action).

郭註惡醜也無君人之位以濟乎人之死者  明物不由權勢而徃也無聚禄望人之腹  者明非求食而徃也又以惡駭天下者明  不以形美故徃也和而不唱者非和而致  之也知不出乎四域者不役思於分外也  雌雄合乎前者才全者與物無害故入獸  不亂群人鳥不亂行而爲萬物之靈也悶  然而後應者寵辱不足以驚其神也汜而  若辭者人辭亦辭也㹠子食於其死母者  食乳也夫生者以才德爲類死而才德去  矣故生者以失類而走也故含德之厚比  於赤子無徃而不爲之赤子也則天下莫  之害斯得類而眀己故也情苟類焉則雖  形不與同而物無害心情類苟亡則雖形  同母子而不足以固其志矣使其形者才  德是也翣者武所資也戰死則無武翣將  安施所愛屨者爲足故耳刖者之屨何爲  愛之無其本者翣屨以足武爲本也不翦  不穿全其形也不得復使恐傷其形也採  擇嬪御及燕爾新婚本以形好爲意者也  故形之全也無以降至尊之情回貞女之  操也德全而物愛之宜矣死生存亡以至  饑渴寒暑其理固當不可逃也故人之生  也非誤生也生之所有非妄有也天地雖  大萬物雖多然吾之所遇適在於是則雖  天地神明國家聖賢絶力至知而弗能違  也故凡所不遇弗能遇也其所遇弗能不
Interpretation

This passage employs multiple metaphors to discuss the relationship between "talent and virtue" (才能与德行) and external appearances, emphasizing that what truly matters is inner essence rather than outward form.

Guo Xiang's commentary points out: If someone without a ruler's authority can save the dying, it shows that good deeds don't depend on power or status. If one can satisfy others' hunger without relying on official salary, it proves that helping others isn't motivated by personal gain. Those with ugly appearances yet renowned throughout the world demonstrate that fame doesn't stem from physical beauty. Those who remain composed without actively promoting themselves reveal that their virtue (德, De) flows naturally rather than being forced. And those whose wisdom doesn't exceed ordinary affairs show they don't exhaust themselves with matters beyond their scope.

When inner talent and virtue are complete, a person harmonizes with all things—entering a herd of beasts without disturbing them, stepping among birds without disrupting their order. This is the true mark of the spirit (神, Shen) that connects all beings. A tranquil mind remains unshaken by honor, disgrace, gain, or loss. In interactions, such a person follows others' lead—drawing close when others do, withdrawing when they retreat. Just as piglets instinctively suckle from a dead sow, living beings naturally follow those with talent and virtue, abandoning them only when these qualities are lost.

Those deeply cultivated in the Dao and its virtue (道德) are like infants—cherished wherever they go, for nothing under heaven would harm them. When essence aligns, even differing forms coexist peacefully; when essence differs, not even mother-child bonds endure. What truly determines a form's worth is its inner talent and virtue.

A warrior's armor depends on his martial prowess—once fallen in battle, the armor loses meaning. People cherish shoes because they need feet—why would an amputee still value footwear? Preserving a body intact yet unused stems from fear of harming it. Consorts and newlyweds may be chosen for beauty, but lasting bonds rely on virtue. When virtue is complete, all things naturally offer devotion.

Life and death, survival and demise, hunger and thirst, heat and cold—these are the patterns of nature, inescapable. Human birth isn't a mistake, nor are life's encounters accidental. Though heaven and earth are vast, and all things numerous, we only meet what we're fated to meet. Even celestial spirits (神明), earthly deities, or sages of nations couldn't alter this inevitability with all their strength and wisdom. Thus, what hasn't been encountered can never be encountered, and what has been encountered cannot be avoided.

 遇也其所弗爲弗能爲也其所爲弗能不  爲也付之而自當矣命行事變不舍晝夜  推之不去留之不停故才全者隨所遇而  任之也夫始非知之所規而故非情之所  留是以知命之必行事之必變者豈於終  規始在新戀故哉雖有至知而弗能規也  逝者之徃吾柰之何哉荀知性命之固當  則雖死生窮之千變萬化淡然自若而和  理在身矣故曰不足滑和靈府者精神之  宅也至足者不以憂患驚神故曰不可入  於靈府和性不滑靈府間豫則雖涉乎至  變不失其兊然也故曰和豫通而不失於  兊日夜無郤者泯然常任之也與物爲春  者群生之所賴也接而生時於心者順四  時而俱化也天下之平莫盛於停水無情  至平故天下取正焉故曰平者水停之盛  也其可以爲法也内保之而外不蕩者内  保其明外無情爲玄鑒洞照與物無私故  能全其平而行其法也事得以成物得以  和謂之德也無事不成無物不和此德之  不形也是以天下樂推而不厭 筆乘望如月望之望圓足飽滿之義和而不  倡不見其能首事也知不出乎四域不見  其有逺略也禄位才貌舉皆無之而致雌  雄交歸焉非使物保而物自保之也是何  人也疑其所以動人者何在施子之喻言  形不足愛而使其形者可愛也母愛以使  其形者爲本戰以武爲本行以足爲本哀
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here expounds the principle of following nature and accepting destiny. When something must be done, it cannot be avoided; when something should not be done, it cannot be forced. Entrusting everything to the natural order achieves perfect harmony. The movement of fate and the transformation of worldly affairs are like the ceaseless alternation of day and night—we can neither obstruct nor retain them. Thus, the truly wise accept all encounters with equanimity.

The beginning of destiny is not determined by human planning, nor is its outcome swayed by emotions. Understanding that destiny inevitably unfolds and worldly affairs inevitably change, one avoids clinging anxiously to the old or the new. Even the wisest cannot foresee the future. What can we do in the face of passing time? So long as we recognize that life and nature are simply thus, then even amid the myriad transformations of life and death, fortune and adversity, we can maintain inner peace, allowing the harmonious Dao to dwell within.

The "spiritual abode" (lingfu) refers to the dwelling place of the human spirit. Those who are truly content are not disturbed by worries, hence external things cannot invade their spiritual abode. Maintaining a tranquil heart and a serene spirit, even great upheavals will not unsettle their composure. Day and night, they move in harmony with nature, flourishing alongside all things. Adjusting their state of mind with the changing seasons, they remain as still as placid water. The water's surface is the fairest measure—thus the world takes it as its standard.

With inner clarity and outer steadfastness, unmoved by external things, they reflect all things like a mirror, harboring no selfish thoughts. Only thus can they achieve perfect stillness and emulate nature. When affairs succeed and all things harmonize, this is the manifestation of De (Virtue/Power). When virtue reaches such a subtle and traceless state, all under heaven will gladly revere it without weariness.

Like the full moon, they are complete and abundant—harmonious without forcing dominance. Their wisdom does not exceed the bounds of daily life, nor do they pursue lofty schemes. Though lacking rank, talent, or beauty, they naturally draw others to them. They do not deliberately seek to preserve all things—yet all things return to them of their own accord. Wherein lies such a person's charm? As Master Shi said: "The form is not worthy of admiration—what is truly precious is the spirit that governs it." A mother's love originates in life itself; warfare is rooted in preparedness; walking relies on one's feet as its foundation.

 駘它所以存而見任去而見思者有本故  耳才即孟子降才之才才未全者率喜而  自衛才全則德内足矣奚形之有生死存  亡窮達貧富賢與不肖毁譽飢渴寒暑雖  其變若彼然求其所以爲之者而不得故  謂之命也苟知其始所以爲之者則獨何  能無槩然今其變雖日夜遞遷了無停息  而其所始即智者莫能求之所謂未始有  始者也知其未始有始而又何至滑吾之  太和干吾之靈府也耶兊如老子塞其兊  之兊和豫通而不失于兊與物爲春而日  夜無隙即所謂不形者也如此雖日接萬  變皆動而不失其時矣水停而平則萬物  準之乎則内能自保停則外不搖蕩水之  平猶德之和也是和也修之已而成故曰  成和之脩物不能離又解不形之意即一  而不分死生無變之謂也 闉跂支離無賑說稅衛靈公靈公悅之而悅 全人其脰脰肩肩甕㼜盎大癭說齊桓公桓 公悅之而視全人其脰肩肩故德有所長而 形有所忘人不忘其所忘而忘其所不忘此 謂誠忘故聖人有所遊而知智爲孽約爲膠 德爲接工爲商聖人不謀惡用知不斲惡用 膠無喪惡用德不貨惡用商四者天鬻也天 鬻也者天食嗣也既受食於天又惡用人有 人之形無人之情有人之形故群於人無人 之情故是非不得於身眇乎不哉所以屬於
Interpretation

This passage explores Zhuangzi's philosophical reflections on virtue (De) and physical form. The hunchbacked Taitu was beloved precisely because he embodied the fundamental principle of inner virtue. Those who are truly accomplished ("perfect in talent") need not deliberately display themselves, for when inner virtue is abundant, external form becomes irrelevant.

Life and death, wealth and poverty, praise and blame—these seemingly chaotic external changes are ultimately beyond our control, belonging to the realm of "destiny." When one comprehends that all things fundamentally have no beginning ("never having begun"), such fluctuations cannot disturb the inner harmony ("Great Harmony"). Like Laozi's teaching to "block the openings" (closing off sensory desires), one maintains inner clarity without indulgence, harmonizing with all things without leaving traces—this is the state of "formlessness."

Still water becomes the measure for all things; when virtue achieves harmony, it stabilizes both internal and external realms. This cultivated harmony, called "the cultivation of perfected harmony," is indispensable to all existence. "Formlessness" represents unity with the Dao, transcending the vicissitudes of life and death.

The text then presents two examples: the hunchbacked Yinqi Zhili and the neckless Weng'ang Daying, whose exceptional virtue made rulers perceive ordinary people as defective instead. This illustrates how virtue makes physical imperfections forgotten. The sage maintains natural spontaneity, requiring none of the four artificial means—scheming, restraint, forced virtue, or transactional relationships—for Heaven provides nourishment ("nourished by Heaven"). Having human form yet remaining unentangled by worldly attachments enables transcendence beyond right and wrong. How sublime this state of being is!

人也警敖乎大哉獨成其天惠子謂莊子曰 人故無情乎莊子曰然惠子曰人而無情何 以謂之人莊子曰道與之貌天與之形惡得 不謂之人惠子曰既謂之人惡得無情莊子 曰是非吾所謂情也吾所謂無情者言人之 不以好惡内傷其身常因自然而不益生也 惠子曰不益生何以有其身莊子曰道與之 貌天與之形無以好惡内傷其身今子外乎 子之神勞乎子之精倚樹而吟據槁梧而暝 眠天選子之形子以堅白鳴 郭註闉跂支離無脤兩段言偏情一徃則醜  者更好而奸者更醜也德有所長而形有  所忘者其德長於順物忘其醜長於逆物  忘其好也生則愛之死則棄之故德者世  之所不忘也形者理之所不存也故夫忘  形者非忘也不忘形而忘德者乃誠忘也  聖人遊於自得之場放之而無不至者才  德全也知爲孽約爲膠德爲接工爲商此  四者自然相生其理已具故聖人無所用  其己也天鬻也者天食也言自然而禀之  也既禀之自然其理已足則雖沉思以免  難或明戒以避禍物無妄然皆天地之會  至理之趣必自思之非我恩也必自不恩  非我不恩也或恩而免之或恩而不免或  不恩而免之或不思而不免凡此皆非我  也又奚爲哉任之而自至也有人之形者  視其形貌若人也無人之情者掘若稿木
Interpretation

Hui Shi asked Zhuangzi, "Can a person truly be without emotions?" Zhuangzi replied, "Yes." Hui Shi pressed further, "If a person lacks emotions, can they still be called human?"

Zhuangzi explained, "The Dao (the cosmic origin) endows humans with countenance, Heaven (natural law) bestows physical form—how could they not be called human?" Hui Shi continued, "Since they're human, how can they lack emotions?" Zhuangzi clarified, "What I mean by 'without emotions' isn't absence of feeling, but rather not allowing preferences and aversions to harm one's inner being, following natural principles without forced striving."

Hui Shi countered, "Without conscious self-cultivation, how can one preserve physical health?" Zhuangzi pointed out, "The Dao grants countenance, Heaven bestows form—the key lies in not letting preferences and aversions injure yourself. Yet you exhaust your spirit, leaning against trees reciting verses, dozing against withered parasol woods. Heaven gave you physical form, yet you obsess over debates like the 'Hard and White' arguments of the School of Names."

Guo Xiang's commentary adds: Just as the lame and hunchbacked, by overemphasizing certain aspects, make their deformities more pronounced and their cunning more apparent, truly virtuous people who accord with all things forget their physical imperfections; those who defy nature forget their inherent beauty. Ordinary people often cherish things in life but discard them after death. Thus virtue endures eternally while physical forms ultimately fade.

Sages wander freely in boundless realms, thereby achieving complete virtue. Regarding cleverness as calamity, restraint as bondage, virtue as transaction, and skill as merchandise—these four all arise from natural principles. Sages need no deliberate action, for all is bestowed by nature. Just as Heaven nurtures all things through natural endowment. Since all follows natural arrangement, whether through careful avoidance of misfortune or enlightened self-preservation, all things operate according to celestial patterns. Some perils can be averted by forethought, others remain unavoidable despite contemplation; some dangers are escaped unwittingly, others encountered unexpectedly—none of this lies within human control, so better to follow nature's course.

Possessing human form, one appears human; freed from worldly emotional entanglements, the mind becomes serene as withered wood, transcendent and detached.

 之枝也群於人者類聚群分自然之道也  是非不得於身者無情故浩然無不任無  不任者有情之所未能也故形貌若人而  獨成其天也道與之貌天與之形者言人  之生也非情之所生也生之所知豈情之  所知哉故有情於爲離曠而弗能也然離  曠以無情而聦明矣有情於爲賢聖而弗  能也然賢聖以無情而賢聖矣豈直賢聖  絶遠而離曠難慕哉雖下愚聾瞽及鷄鳴  犬吠苟有情於爲之亦終不能也不問遠  之與近雖去己一分孔顔之際終莫之得  也是以觀之萬物反取諸身耳目不能以  易任成功手足不能以代司致業故嬰兒  之始生也不以目求乳不以耳向明不以  足操物不以手求行豈百骸無定司形貌  無素主而專由情以制之哉既謂之人惡  得無情者未解形貌之非情也是非吾所  謂情者以是非爲情則無是無非無好無  惡者雖有形貌直是人耳情將安寄無情  者之人不以好惡傷其身言任當而直前  者非情也常因自然而不益生者止於當  也不益生何以有其身者未明生之自生  理之自足也莊子又謂生理已具足於形  貌之中但任之則身存奸惡之情非所以  益生秪足以傷身以其生之有分也夫神  不休於性分之内則外矣精不止於自生  之極則勞矣故行則倚樹而吟坐則據梧  而眠言有情者之自困也天選子形以堅
Interpretation

This passage explores the relationship between "emotional attachments" and the "natural Dao." Zhuangzi posits that all things naturally group according to their kind—this is the inherent pattern of the Dao's operation. Those who attain true transcendence remain unbound by worldly distinctions of right and wrong, having reached the state of "non-attachment" (wǔqíng). Here, "non-attachment" does not imply indifference, but rather freedom from personal preferences that distort one's innate nature.

The text illustrates this through examples: Li Zhu (renowned for extraordinary vision) and Shi Kuang (the legendary musician) could fully manifest their talents precisely because they did not force their abilities. Similarly, sages become sages through alignment with nature, not through deliberate striving. Conversely, ordinary people clinging to imitation—like a deaf person straining to hear music or a blind person attempting painting—invariably fail.

Infants naturally nurse and perceive the world without consciously using eyes to locate nipples or ears to discern direction, demonstrating how bodily functions follow inherent design. Zhuangzi emphasizes that human form already contains complete life mechanisms—forcing conscious control damages this innate nature. Just as shen (spirit) dissipates when not anchored in its natural domain, and jing (essence) depletes when exceeding natural limits.

Those entangled by desires lean against trees while walking and recline on parasol trees when sitting—all manifestations of self-constraint. Yet the "heaven-chosen form" (tiān xuǎn zhī xíng) possesses inherent wholeness; health emerges through spontaneous accord. Deliberate life-nurturing efforts may paradoxically harm vitality, for life's self-regulating mechanisms are complete unto themselves.

 白嗚言凡子所爲外神勞精倚樹據梧且  吟且睡此世之所謂情也而云天選明夫  情者非情之所生而况他哉故雖萬物萬  形云爲取舍皆在無情中來又何用情於  其間我   大宗師第六 知天之所爲知人之所爲者至矣知天之所 爲者天而生也知人之所爲者以其知之所 知以養其知之所不知終其天年而不中道 天者是知之盛也雖然有患夫知有所待而 後當其所待者特未定也庸詎知吾所謂天 之非人乎所謂人之非天乎且有眞人而後 有眞知何謂眞人古之眞人不逆寡不雄成 不謨士若然者過而弗悔當而不自得也若 然者登高不慄入水不濡入火不熱是知之 能登假格於道也若此 郭註知天人之所爲者皆自然也則内放其  身而外冥於物與衆玄同任之而無不至  也天者自然之謂也夫爲爲者不能爲而  爲自爲耳爲知者不能知而知自知耳自  知耳不知也不知也則知出于不知矣自  爲耳不爲也不爲也則爲出于不爲矣爲  出於不爲故以不爲爲主知出於不知故  以不知爲宗是故眞人遺知而知不爲而  爲自然而生坐忘而得故知稱絶而爲名  去也人之生也形雖七尺而五常必具故  雖區區之身乃舉天地以奉之故天地萬  物凡所有者不可一日而相無也一物不  具則生者無由得生一理不至則天年無
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here explores the realm of the "Authentic Person" (Zhenren) and true wisdom. He observes that ordinary people exhaust their Shen (spirit) and Qi (vital energy) in daily struggles, leaning against trees to chant or doze—this is what the world calls "applying emotion and effort." But true wisdom (heaven's chosen path) cannot be attained through such deliberate striving. The transformations and choices of all things ultimately stem from the emotionless natural Dao—why force artificial sentiment upon them?

The greatest wisdom lies in understanding the workings of heaven and the actions of humans. To know heaven's workings is to follow nature's course in living; to know human actions is to use acquired knowledge to nurture what remains unknown, thereby attaining one's natural lifespan without premature demise. Yet even this understanding has limits, for human knowledge always depends on specific conditions that are themselves uncertain. Who can say for certain that what we call "heaven" isn't actually "human," or that what we term "human" isn't in fact "heaven"?

The state of the Authentic Person (one who has attained the Dao) is this: they do not oppose the minority, boast of achievements, or scheme in worldly affairs. Such a person feels no regret over mistakes nor pride in successes; unafraid when climbing heights, unwetted when entering water, unburned when passing through fire. This wisdom allows complete unity with the Dao.

Commentator Guo Xiang explains: Understanding that both heavenly and human actions are natural enables inner tranquility and outer harmony with all things. Heaven is nature itself—deliberate action obstructs true action, for real action is non-deliberate (Wuwei); forced knowing prevents true knowledge, for real knowing is unforced. Thus the Authentic Person forgets knowledge yet understands naturally, refrains from striving yet accomplishes effortlessly, attaining true wisdom through "sitting in forgetfulness" (Zuowang, the practice of transcending physical form).

Though the human body stands but seven feet tall, it contains all Five Phases (Wuxing); though physically small, it requires the entire cosmos for sustenance. Not a single thing in heaven and earth can be dispensed with—remove one element and life becomes unsustainable, neglect one principle and the natural lifespan cannot be preserved.

 縁得終然身之所有者知或不知也理之  所存者爲或不爲也故知之所知者寡而  身之所有者衆爲之所爲者少而理之所  存者愽在上者莫能器之而求其備焉人  之所知不必同而所爲不敢異異則僞成  而真䘮矣或奸知不倦以困其百體所好  不過一技而舉根俱弊斯以其所知而害  六所不知也若夫知之盛者知人之所爲  有分故任而不强也知人之所知有極故  用而不蕩也故所知不以無涯自困則一  體之中知與不知闇相與會而俱全矣斯  以其所知養其所不知也有患者言知雖  盛未若遣知任天之無患也夫知者未能  無可無不可故必有待也若乃任天而生  則遇物而當矣所侍未定言有待則無定  也吾生有涯天也心欲蓋之人也然此人  之所謂耳物無非天也天也者自然也人  皆自然則治亂成敗遇與不遇非人爲也  皆自然耳有真人而後天下之知皆得其  真而不可亂也不逆寡則所順者衆不雄  成則不恃其成而處物先不謨士則縱心  直前而群士自合非謀謨以致之直自全  當而無過耳非以得失經心也若然者理  固自全非畏死也故真人陸行而非避濡  也遠火而非逃熱也無過而非措當也故  雖不以熱爲熱而未嘗赴火不以濡爲濡  未嘗蹈水不以死爲死未嘗喪生故夫生  者豈生之而生哉成者豈成之而成哉故
Interpretation

This passage explores the profound relationship between human cognition and nature. What humans can comprehend is actually quite limited, while the potential contained within the body is vast; what people can accomplish is meager, yet the principles governing cosmic operation are boundless. Even those in high positions cannot fully master all things—forcing completeness leads instead to losing authenticity.

People's knowledge varies, yet their actions dare not differ, for deliberate pursuit of uniqueness leads to artificiality and loss of true nature. Some exhaust their bodies with cunning intellect, obsessing over particular skills until both body and mind are depleted—this is using finite knowledge to harm infinite potential. Those with genuine wisdom understand that each person's capabilities have limits, thus they follow nature without forcing; they know human cognition has boundaries, thus they employ wisdom without indulgence.

By not tormenting oneself with infinite knowledge, the known and unknown can coexist harmoniously within the body. This is the principle of nurturing the unknown with the known. Some worry that no amount of wisdom compares to relinquishing it and following nature's flow for carefree living. True sages recognize that nothing is absolutely right or wrong, thus they always maintain restraint. Complete alignment with nature enables appropriate response to any situation.

The finitude of human life is natural law; the mind's desire to transcend limits is human striving. In truth, all things are manifestations of nature. If everyone followed nature spontaneously, then order and chaos, success and failure, opportunities gained and lost would all lie beyond human control. Only by attaining the state of "Zhenren" (True Person) can the world's cognition return to its authentic, unconfused origin.

The Zhenren neither opposes the minority to gain majority support, nor forces success yet naturally leads, nor deliberately schemes yet achieves effortlessly. This comes not through calculation, but through perfect alignment with nature that leaves no room for error. When walking, they don't avoid dampness; keeping distance from fire isn't to escape heat—their flawless conduct stems from perfect appropriateness. They don't perceive heat as heat, thus never consciously avoid fire; don't perceive dampness as dampness, thus never consciously shun water; don't perceive death as death, thus never truly lose life. Neither life nor accomplishment can be attained through deliberate pursuit.

 任之而無不至者眞人也豈有槩意於所  遇哉言夫知之登至於道者若此之逺也 古之眞人其寢不夢其覺教無憂其食不甘 其息深深眞人之息以踵衆人之息以喉屈 服者其嗌厄言若畦其嗜欲深者其天機淺 古之眞人不知悅生不知惡死其出不訢欣 其入不詎翛蕭然而徃翛然而來而已矣不 忘其所始不求其所終受而喜之忘而復之 是之謂不以心捐道不以人助天是之謂眞 人 郭註寢不夢無意想也覺無憂遇即安也食  不甘理當食耳眞人之息以踵乃在根本  中來嗌言若哇氣不平暢也深根寧極然  後反一無欲故嗜欲深者天機淺也不知  悅生惡死者與化爲體不訢不詎者泰然  而任之也脩然徃來者寄之至理故徃來  而不難也終始變化皆忘之矣豈直逆忘  其生而猶復採求死意耶受而喜者不問  所受者何物遇之而無不適也忘而復者  復之不由於識乃至也夫人生而靜天之  性也感物而動性之欲也物之感人無窮  人之逐物無節則天理滅矣眞人知用心  則背道助天則傷生故不爲也 筆乘出世爲出即生也來也始與受也返造  化爲入即死也徃也終與復也知其始之  未始有始也則不忘其所始矣知其終之  未始有終也則不求其所終矣如此則可  以出入造化遊戲死生而奚悅與惡之有
Interpretation

Those who can follow nature without forcing things are the true attainers of the Dao (zhenren). They never harbor calculating minds toward their circumstances. Know that the path to reaching the great Dao through intellectual understanding is exceedingly distant.

The ancient Dao attainers lived remarkably: they dreamed not in sleep, worried not when awake, sought no delicacies in eating, and breathed with deep, sustained rhythms. Their breath reached down to their heels, while ordinary people's breath only reaches the throat. Those subservient to desires speak with hurried, uneven breath - the deeper one's desires, the shallower their innate spiritual capacity (tianji) becomes.

Genuine Dao masters neither cling to life nor dread death. They neither rejoice at birth nor resist departure, coming and going with effortless freedom. They neither forget their origins nor forcibly seek final destinations, receiving life with joyful acceptance and returning to essence when forgotten. This is what we call not deliberately opposing the Dao with intention, not interfering with nature through human effort - this is the mark of true attainment.

Guo Xiang (Jin Dynasty metaphysician) comments: Dreamless sleep comes from having no delusional thoughts; carefree wakefulness stems from accepting circumstances; simple eating follows nature's course. When the Dao attainer's breath reaches the heels, it emerges from life's root foundation. Gasping speech reveals unbalanced heart-energy. Only by deeply planting one's roots and maintaining utmost stillness can one return to pure unity. The deeper the desires, the shallower the innate spirituality. Those neither coveting life nor fearing death have merged with creation itself. Their equanimity comes from peacefully accepting all things. Their effortless movement flows from abiding in supreme truth, making life's transitions unburdensome.

Life's beginnings and endings, transformations and dissolutions all become transparent - why then deliberately avoid life or pursue death? Joyful acceptance means meeting all circumstances with peace; returning to essence after forgetting isn't achieved through forced knowing. Humans are originally pure and still - this is heavenly nature; desires arise through external influences - this is human manifestation. When endlessly tempted by external things without restraint, heavenly principle is lost. The Dao attainer understands: deliberate intention diverges from the Dao, human interference harms life - thus they avoid both.

The Bi Cheng commentary explains: Birth is "emergence" - life's beginning and reception; returning to creation is "entering" - death and conclusion. Understanding life has no true beginning, one doesn't cling to origins; knowing death has no real ending, one doesn't force destinations. Reaching this state, one moves freely within creation, transcending life-death constraints - where then could clinging or dread arise?

 心捐道者心一有所變即捐道矣道無生  死而人有二心非棄道而何人助天者即  老子狹其所居厭其所生求益于有生之  外者也而真人不然則知怖死生求出離  猶爲第二義也 若然者其心志其容寂其顙□(去軌/反)妻然似 秋煖喧然似春喜怒通四時與物有宜而莫 知其極故聖人之用兵也亡國而不失人心 利澤施乎萬世不爲愛人故樂洛通物非聖 人也有親非仁也天時非賢也利害不通非  禮爲翼者順時之所行故無不行也夫高  下相受不可逆之流也小大相群不得已  之勢也曠然無情群知之府也之有泝之  會居師人之極者奚爲哉任時世爲知委  必然之事付之天下而已丘者所以本也  以性言之則性之本也夫物各有足足於  本也付群德之自循斯與有足者至於本  也本至而理盡矣凡此皆自彼而成成之  不在已則雖處萬機之極而常間暇自適  忽然不覺事之經身悗然不識言之在口  而人之大迷眞謂至人之爲勤行者也 故其好之也一其弗好之也一其一也一其 不一也一其一與天爲徒其不一與人爲徒 天與人不相勝也是之謂眞人死生命也其 有夜旦之常天也人之有所不得與皆物之 情也彼持以天爲父而身猶愛之而况其卓 乎人特以有君爲愈乎己而身猶死之而况
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the distinction between Daoist adepts (真人) and ordinary people, as well as how to align with the natural Dao (道).

Those whose hearts deviate from the Dao will stray from it as soon as their thoughts change. The Dao itself has no distinction between life and death, yet people often harbor divided minds—is this not willfully abandoning the Dao? Those who seek to assist Heaven are like the individuals criticized by Laozi—they constrict their own existence, despise their lives, yet strive to pursue something beyond life. True adepts of the Dao are not like this; they understand that fearing life and death or seeking transcendence are still secondary concerns.

Genuine adepts maintain focused minds and serene expressions, with broad foreheads. They are solemn like autumn yet warm like spring, their emotions resonating with the shifts of the seasons, harmonizing with all things while remaining unfathomable to others. Thus, when sages employ military force, even if they destroy a nation, they do not lose the people's hearts. Their benevolence flows through generations, yet it is not born of deliberate affection.

Those who cling to external things or show partiality are not sages; those who discriminate between closeness and distance are not truly virtuous; those who rigidly adhere to the timing of Heaven are not wise; those who cannot discern the interplay of benefit and harm do not truly understand ritual. The genuinely wise act in accordance with the times, and thus they encounter no obstacles. Just as high and low naturally follow one another in the flow of water, and large and small depend on each other as the natural order dictates, an expansive mind free of private biases is the wellspring of wisdom.

All things have their roots; in terms of innate nature, this is the source of their being. When each thing is complete in its own foundation, allowing all virtues (德) to operate naturally, one returns to the origin. Returning to the origin means fully comprehending the principle. All such achievements arise from aligning with what is natural, not from forced effort. Thus, even when managing countless affairs, one remains at ease, accomplishing things without conscious intention, and speaking as if words flow spontaneously.

People's greatest delusion is believing that adepts of the Dao achieve their state through deliberate striving. In truth, whether they like or dislike something, they maintain the same mind; whether in agreement or disagreement, they remain unified. When aligned with the Dao of Heaven, they belong to the same category as nature; when differing from others, they belong to the same category as ordinary people. Heaven and humanity are not in opposition—this is the mark of a true adept.

Life and death are fated, just as day and night follow natural cycles. There are things beyond human intervention—these are the constants of existence. People revere Heaven as a father—how much more should they revere the supreme Dao? People consider rulers nobler than themselves and are willing to die for them—how much more should they devote themselves to the highest truth?

其眞乎泉涸魚相與處於陸相呴吁以濕相 瀉儒以沫不如相忘於江湖與其譽余堯而 非桀也不如而忘而化其道 郭註常無心而順彼故好與不好所善所惡  與彼無二也其一也天徒也其不一也人  徒也夫眞人同天人均彼我不以其一異  乎不一無有不一者天也彼彼而我我者  人也眞人同天人齊萬致萬致不相非天  人不相勝故曠然無不一冥然無不任而  玄同彼我也其有夜日之常天之道也故  知死生者命之極非妄然也若夜旦耳奚  所係哉眞人在晝得晝在夜得夜以死生  爲晝夜豈有所不得乎人之有所不得而  憂虞在懷皆物情耳非理也卓者獨化之  謂也夫相因之功莫若獨化之至也人之  所因者天也天之所生者獨化也人皆以  天爲父故晝夜寒暑猶安之而不敢惡况  卓爾獨化至於玄冥之竟又安得而不任  之哉眞者不假於物而自然也夫自然之  不可違豈直君命而已哉故證以因魚之  喻與其不足而相愛豈若有餘而相忘夫  非譽皆生於不足至足者忘善惡遣死生  與變化爲一曠然無不適矣又安知堯桀  之所在耶 夫大塊載我以形勞我以生佚我以老息我 以死故善吾生者乃所以善吾死也夫藏舟 於壑藏山於澤謂之固矣然而夜半有力者 負之而走昧者不知也藏小大有宜猶有所
Interpretation

When the springs dry up and fish are stranded on land, they moisten each other with their saliva to survive. Though such mutual aid in hardship seems touching, it would be far better for them to forget each other while swimming freely in rivers and lakes. Rather than praising the virtuous Emperor Yao and condemning the tyrant Jie, it's better to forget such value judgments and merge with the Dao.

Guo Xiang, the Neo-Daoist scholar of the Wei-Jin period, comments: Those who have truly attained the Dao maintain a state of wuwei (non-action), following nature without deliberate distinctions between good and bad. When humans unite with heaven and earth, they reach the state of "heavenly disciple" (natural harmony); when obsessed with distinctions, they become "human disciples" (artificial contrivances). The zhenren (perfected person) harmonizes heaven and humanity, dissolving all dualities. They neither negate differences in pursuit of unity, nor disrupt unity by emphasizing differences. Like heaven, they embrace all things, allowing natural development to achieve profound unity.

The alternation of day and night follows natural law; life and death are like this cyclical change—both inevitable processes of existence. The zhenren lives fully by day and rests peacefully at night, regarding life and death as naturally as the turning of day. How could they feel discomfort? Human suffering arises from attachment to external things—these are artificial fixations contrary to the Dao. "Zhuo" refers to independent transformation (self-sufficient change), for all fundamental transformations occur spontaneously. Humans rely on the Dao of Heaven, which generates this autonomous transformation. Regarding heaven as their father, people peacefully accept the alternation of day and night and the change of seasons—how much more should they embrace the profound mysteries of natural creation?

Those who truly embody the Dao depend on nothing, completely following spontaneity. The laws of nature cannot be defied—how much less should human commands be heeded? Like the fish moistening each other, forced affection in hardship pales beside mutual forgetting in freedom. Value judgments stem from insufficiency; the fully content forget good and evil, transcend life and death, unite with transformation, and attain adaptability—why would they care about distinctions between Yao and Jie?

The earth bears my physical form, life keeps me laboring, old age brings me ease, and death grants me rest. Thus those who cherish life must also find peace in death. Hiding a boat in mountain valleys or concealing mountains in lakes may seem secure, but divine power could remove them at midnight—fools remain unaware. However well things are hidden, all may eventually be lost; only by following nature's transformations can one find the eternal Dao.

遯若夫藏天下於天下而不得所遯是恒物 之大情也特犯人之形而猶喜之若人之形 者萬化而未始有極也其爲樂可勝計耶故 聖人將遊於物之所不得遯而皆存善天善 老善貽善終人猶效之又况萬物之所係而 一化之所待乎 郭註夫形生老死皆我也故形爲我載生爲  我勞老爲我佚死爲我息四者雖變未始  非我我奚惜哉死與生皆命也無善則已  有善則生不獨善也故若以吾生爲善乎  則吾死亦善也方言生死變化之不可逃  故先舉無逃之極然後明之以必變之符  將任化而無係也夫無力之力莫大於變  化者也故乃掲天地以趨新負山嶽以金  故故不暫停忽已涉新則天地萬物無時  而不移也世皆新矣而自以爲故舟山日  易而視之若前今交一臂而失之在冥中  去矣故向者之我非復今我也我與今俱  徃豈常守故哉而世莫之覺謂今之所遇  可係而在豈不昩哉不知與化爲體而思  藏之使不化則雖至深至固各得其所宜  而無以禁其日變也故夫藏而有之者不  能止其遯也無藏而任化者變不能變也  無所藏而都任之則與物無不冥與化無  不一故無内外無死生體天地合變化索  所遯而不得矣此乃常物之大情非一曲  之小意也人形乃是萬化之一遇耳無極  之中所遇者皆若人也豈特人形可喜而
Interpretation

When all things under heaven are seen as integral parts of the natural Dao (the Way), there remains nothing to escape from—this is the fundamental truth of eternal existence. We happen to acquire human form and become complacent, yet this physical body is but a minuscule link in the endless transformation of all things. How can such fleeting joy ever be fully accounted for? Thus, the sage dwells in the ultimate truth from which nothing can escape.

Guo Xiang (a Jin Dynasty Neo-Daoist philosopher) annotates: The birth, aging, and death of the human form are all aspects of the "true self." The body is my vessel, life my labor, aging my respite, and death my repose. Though these four states transform, they never depart from the essence of the "true self"—why should I cling to any? Life and death are both decreed by heaven. If life were not beautiful, neither would death be; since life is beautiful, death must be equally so. This illustrates how the transformations of life and death are inescapable—first pointing to the ultimate reality we cannot evade, then clarifying the inevitable laws of change, so we may harmonize with creation without attachment.

No force in this world surpasses the power of transformation. Heaven and earth renew themselves ceaselessly; it is as if mountains were carried forward while remaining unaware of their own metamorphosis. People assume familiar things remain unchanged, yet even boats and mountains are imperceptibly replaced. The "me" of a moment ago is no longer the present "me"—both self and the immediate moment are in flux. What constancy could possibly exist? Yet humans persistently grasp at ephemera—what folly!

To attempt hiding things from change, no matter how deeply or securely concealed, cannot halt their daily transformation. Rather than forcing preservation, let nature take its course. When you cease clinging to anything, you merge completely with all things and unite with change itself. Then distinctions between inner and outer, life and death dissolve; you become one with heaven and earth, synchronous with transformation, without even the notion of escape arising. This is the root truth of eternal existence—not some partial or narrow perspective.

The human form is merely one configuration in infinite transformation. In the boundless flow of creation, all encounters are as transient as this physical body—why cling exclusively to human existence for joy?

 餘物無樂耶本非人而化爲人化爲人失  于故矣失故而喜喜所遇也變化無窮何  所不遇所遇而樂樂豈有極乎夫聖人遊  於變化之途放於日新之流萬物萬化亦  與之萬化化者無極亦與之無極誰得遯  之哉夫於生爲亡而於死爲存於死爲存  則何時而非存哉夫自均於百年之内不  善少而否老未能體變化齊死生也然其  乎粹猶足以師人也况玄同萬物而與化  爲體其爲天下之所宗也不亦宜乎 夫道有情有信無爲無形可傳而不可受可 得而不可見自本自根未有天地自古以固 存神鬼神帝生天生地在太極之先而不爲 高在六極之下而不爲深先天地生而不爲 久長於上古而不爲老狶喜韋氏得之以挈 天地伏戲義得之以襲氣毋維斗得之終古 不忒日月得之終古不息堪坏丕得之以襲 崑崙馮憑夷得之以遊大川肩吾得之以處 大山黄帝得之以登雲天顓頊得之以處玄 宫禺强得之立乎北極西王母得之坐乎少 廣莫知其始莫知其終彭祖得之上及有虞 下及五伯傅說得之以相武丁奄有天下乘 東維騎箕尾而比於列星 郭註有無情之情故無爲也有常無之信故  無形也古今傳而宅之莫能受而有之咸  得自容而莫見其狀未有天地自古固存  明無不侍有而無也無也豈能生神哉不
Interpretation

This passage expounds the profound Daoist philosophy regarding the essence of the Dao (the Way) and the transformations of all things.

The transformations of all beings follow natural laws. Humans evolved from other forms, yet this transformation has already departed from the original source. People delight in novelty, but such joy stems from accidental encounters. Change knows no bounds—who can predict all possible encounters? The true sage (one who has attained the Dao) follows the Dao of transformation like flowing water that renews itself daily. As the myriad things continuously transform, the sage transforms accordingly. Since transformation itself has no limits, neither does the sage—who can escape this universal principle?

Birth and death are manifestations of transformation: what appears as extinction is actually another form of existence; what seems like death marks a new beginning. If death signifies eternal existence, then when is existence ever absent? Ordinary people, confined by their hundred-year lifespans, cannot properly perceive the differences between youth and old age, let alone comprehend the essence of life-death transformations. Yet even the pure state of ordinary people is worthy of emulation—how much more so those who have merged with all things and made transformation their fundamental substance? Is it not perfectly reasonable that such Dao-attainers are revered by all under heaven?

The Dao (cosmic origin) possesses a genuine and trustworthy essence—it acts through wuwei (non-action) and is formless. It can be transmitted but not directly bestowed; it can be realized but not seen or heard. It takes itself as the source, existing eternally before heaven and earth. It makes ghosts and spirits manifest, gives birth to heaven and earth. Neither "high" above the Taiji (Supreme Ultimate) nor "deep" below the six directions (universe), neither "ancient" before heaven and earth nor "aged" beyond high antiquity.

The text enumerates numerous Dao-attainers: The ancient sovereign Xiwei mastered it to govern heaven and earth; Fuxi (cultural progenitor) used it to harmonize primordial Qi; the Big Dipper attained it to remain eternally unwavering; the sun and moon obtained it to move without ceasing; the mountain deity Kanhuai employed it to rule Mount Kunlun; the river god Fengyi could thereby roam the waterways; the mountain god Jianwu dwelled securely on Mount Tai; the Yellow Emperor (progenitor of Chinese civilization) rode clouds to ascend the heavens; Zhuanxu (one of the Five Emperors) resided in the Mysterious Palace; the North Sea deity Yuqiang stood at the North Pole; the Queen Mother of the West (supreme female immortal) presided over Mount Shaoguang; Pengzu (longevity immortal) lived from Emperor Shun's era to the Spring and Autumn period's Five Hegemons; and the virtuous minister Fu Yue assisted King Wuding in governing, later transforming into a constellation astride the stars Ji and Wei.

Guo Xiang's commentary notes: The Dao possesses qing (sentiment) beyond ordinary emotions—hence its wuwei; it maintains constant faithfulness in non-action—hence its formlessness. Though transmitted through ages, none can wholly possess it; all things exist through it yet none see its form. Its eternal existence before heaven and earth proves that "non-being" (the Dao) requires no dependence on "being" (concrete things). How could "non-being" possibly generate spiritual beings? (This refutes the shallow view of "creation from nothingness")

 神鬼帝而鬼帝自神斯乃不神之神也不  生天地而天地自生斯乃不生之生也故  夫人之果不足以神而不神則神矣功何  足有事何足恃哉久道在高爲無高在深  爲無深在久爲無久在者爲無者無所不  在而所在皆無也且上下無不格者不得  以高卑稱也内外無不至者不得以表裏  名也與化俱移者不得言久也終始常無  者不得謂老也自狶韋氏得之至比則星  言得之於道乃所以明其自得耳道不能  使之得也我之未得又不能爲得也然則  凡得之者外不資於道内不由於已掘然  自得而獨化也夫生之難也猶獨化而自  得之矣既得其生又何患于生之不得而  爲之哉故爲生舉不足以全生以其生之  不由于已爲也而爲之則傷其眞生矣 筆乘大宗師者道也至此方明說出道無形  無爲也而曰有情有信者自有以觀其徼  者言之也情靜之動信者動之得即老子  其中有信之信也太易者未見氣太初者  氣之始未見氣爲父則氣者然也北斗天  之綱維故曰維斗堪坏神名人面獸形馮  夷清冷傳曰華隂潼𡖥隄首人服人石得  水仙是爲河泊一云以人月庚子浴于河  而溺之肩吾山神不死至孔子時黄帝得  道登天即鼎湖上升之事玄宫北方之宫  月令曰其帝顓頊其神玄冥是也禺强海  神山海經曰北海之渚有神人面鳥身珥
Interpretation

The text elucidates the essential characteristic of Dao (the Way, core concept in Daoism referring to the cosmic origin and operational principle) as transcending all dualities.

The supreme Dao is revered even by spirits and deities, yet it never deliberately displays its marvels. While it gives birth to heaven and earth, it does not consciously create—this very state of "non-deliberation" constitutes its true wonder. When humans realize they cannot forcibly pursue the miraculous, they may then approach genuine wonder. The Dao is neither lofty nor profound, neither ancient nor recent—it permeates all existence yet remains nowhere to be found.

Dao surpasses all oppositions: having no demarcation between above and below, it cannot be ranked as high or low; having no barrier between inner and outer, it cannot be distinguished as surface or depth; flowing with transformations, it knows no permanence; remaining ever constant, it knows no decay. From the legendary Xiwei (ancient sovereign who attained Dao) to the later Bigan (loyal minister of Shang dynasty), those who seemingly attained Dao merely aligned with the natural awakening of their inherent nature. The Dao never actively bestows itself upon anyone, nor can humans forcibly attain it.

True Dao attainers neither rely on external Dao nor deliberately pursue internal cultivation. Like all things growing naturally, they embody "independent transformation" (self-sufficient spontaneous change). Life itself is a rare miracle, as precious as natural growth. Having already received this life, why forcibly pursue longevity? Deliberate striving only harms life's authentic essence.

The Dao described in the "Great Ancestral Teacher" chapter has no form yet truly exists. The phrase "with feeling and fidelity" (from Laozi) means the Dao contains subtle movement within stillness and constant principles within flux. During the "Grand Undifferentiated" state (primordial chaos before cosmic differentiation), not even Qi (vital energy) existed; only during the "Grand Beginning" phase did Qi first emerge.

The text cites numerous mythological figures: the Northern Dipper governs celestial and terrestrial order; Kanhuai (Kunlun Mountain deity) has a human face and beastly form; Fengyi (River Earl) cultivated at Mount Hua's northern foothills to become a water immortal; Jianwu (mountain deity) attained immortality; the Yellow Emperor rode dragons to heaven upon attaining Dao; Yuqiang (North Sea deity) bears a human face and bird body. These allusions collectively demonstrate that true Dao attainers always follow nature's course—neither forcing nor contriving.

 兩青蛇踐兩赤蛇名禺强西王母山海經  曰狀如人狗尾蓬頭戴勝善嘯居洵水之  涯漢武帝内傳西王母與一功夫人降帝  美容貌神仙人也少廣山名一云西方空  界之名傳說一星在尾上言其乘東維騎  箕尾之間也箕斗爲天漢年之東維 南伯子葵問乎女偊禹曰子之年長矣而色 若孺子何也曰吾聞道矣南伯子葵曰道可 得學耶曰惡惡可子非其人也夫卜梁倚有 聖人之才而無聖人之道我有聖人之道而 無聖人之才吾欲以教之庶幾其果爲聖人 乎不然以聖人之道告聖人之才亦易矣吾 猶守而告之參三曰而後能外天下己外天 下矣吾又守之七日而後能外物已外物矣 吾又守之九日而後能外生已外生矣而後 能朝徹朝徹而後能見獨見獨而後能無古 今無古今而後能人於不死不生殺生者不 死生生者不生其爲物無不將也無不迎也 無不毁也無不成也其名爲攖寧攖寧也者 攖而後成者也南伯子葵曰子獨惡乎聞之 曰聞諸副墨之子副墨之子聞諸洛誦之孫 洛誦之孫聞之膽明瞻明聞之聶許聶許聞 之需役需役聞之於烏謳於謳聞之玄冥玄 冥聞之參寥參寥聞之疑始 郭註聞道則任其自生故氣色全也外猶遺  也物者朝夕所需切已難忘外生則都遣  之也遺生則不惡死不惡死故所遇即安
Interpretation

The Classic of Mountains and Seas records that Yu Qiang (the Northern Sea God) treads upon two blue serpents, while the Queen Mother of the West (Xiwangmu, the foremost female immortal) stands atop two red serpents. Xiwangmu’s appearance resembles a human, with a dog’s tail, disheveled hair, and a jade hair ornament called sheng adorning her head. She excels in whistling and dwells by the Xun River. The Inner Biography of Emperor Wu of Han describes Xiwangmu descending before Emperor Wu accompanied by a female immortal, her beauty radiant like a divine being. "Shaoguang" is both the name of a mountain and a term referring to the void-like realm of the west. Legend holds that the constellation symbolizing Xiwangmu lies above the Tail constellation (Wei). It is said she rides upon the eastern celestial pillar (one of the four corners of the heavens), traversing between the Winnowing Basket (Ji) and Tail constellations, with the Winnowing Basket and Dipper (Dou) marking the annual cycle of the Milky Way.

Nanbo Zikui asked the female sage Nüyu: "You are advanced in years, yet your complexion resembles that of a child—how is this possible?" Nüyu replied: "Because I have comprehended the great Dao." Nanbo Zikui pressed further: "Can the Dao be learned?" Nüyu said: "It is hardly so simple! You are not one who can learn it. Just as Bu Liangyi possessed the disposition of a sage but lacked understanding of the sage’s Dao, I possess the sage’s Dao but lack the sage’s disposition. I attempted to teach him—perhaps to forge a true sage? Yet teaching the sage’s Dao to one with a sage’s disposition is inherently not difficult. I waited and instructed him thus: after three days, he could transcend worldly attachments; having transcended these, after seven more days, he could rise above material desires; beyond material desires, after nine more days, he finally shed the clinging to life and death. Reaching this state, he became as lucid as the morning sun, then perceived the singular, unparalleled Dao; perceiving the Dao, he surpassed temporal constraints, ultimately entering the eternity beyond birth and death. That which extinguishes life does not itself perish; that which generates life does not itself live. In such a state, all things are met—none are not sent off, none are not welcomed, none are not destroyed, none are not fulfilled. This is called 'yingning'—attaining tranquility through disturbance."

Nanbo Zikui asked: "From where did you hear this teaching?" Nüyu replied: "From written records, which came from oral transmission, which came from seeing with the eyes and understanding with the heart, which came from resonance with Qi (vital energy), which came from embodied practice, which came from spontaneous song, which came from profound mystery, which came from the vast emptiness, and ultimately from the undifferentiated chaos of the primordial beginning."

Guo Xiang’s commentary explains: Comprehending the Dao enables one to accord with nature, hence vitality fills one’s countenance. "Transcendence" here means going beyond. The necessities of daily life are hardest to relinquish, yet transcending life and death releases all attachments. Freed from the clinging to life, one no longer fears death; unafraid of death, one finds peace in any circumstance.

 豁然無滯見機而作斯朝徹也當所遇而  安之忘先後之所接斯見獨者也無古今  與獨俱徃也係生故有死惡死故有生無  係無惡則無死無生矣任其自將故無不  將任其自迎故無不迎任其自毁故無不  毁任其自成故無不成夫與物冥者物縈  亦縈而未始不寧也□縈而獨不縈則敗  矣故縈而任之則莫不曲成也玄冥者所  以名無而非無也夫階名以至無者必得  無於名表故雖玄冥猶未極而又推寄於  參寥玄之又玄也自然之理有積習而成  者蓋階近以至遠研粗以至精故乃七重  而後無之名九重而後疑無是始也 子祀子輿子犁子來四人相與語曰孰能以 無爲首以生爲脊以死爲尻(苦羔/反)孰知死生 存亡之一體者吾與之友矣四人相視而笑 莫逆於心遂相與爲友俄而子輿有病子祀 徃問之曰偉哉夫造物者將以予爲此拘拘 也曲僂縷發背上有五管頤隱於齊肩高於 頂句勾贅指天隂陽之氣有沴麗其心間閒 而無事跰(步田/反)踟(悉田/反)而鑑於井曰嗟乎夫 造物者又將以予爲此拘拘也子祀曰女惡 之乎曰亡予何惡浸假而化予之左臂以爲 雞予因以求時夜浸假而化予之右臂以爲 彈予因以求鶚炙浸假而化予之尻以爲輪 以神爲馬予因而乘之豈更駕哉且夫得者
Interpretation

This passage primarily expounds Zhuangzi's philosophical views on life, death, and nature, along with a parable.

It first discusses the realm of those who have awakened to the Dao: when one thoroughly comprehends the essence of things, one can adapt flexibly without obstruction. By being content with present circumstances and forgetting temporal sequences, one may perceive the singular Dao (referring to the ultimate truth transcending time and space). Those who transcend past and present to wander with the Dao will not be bound by life and death. Clinging to life breeds fear of death, and vice versa; only by neither clinging nor rejecting can one transcend this duality. Letting all things follow their natural course without interference allows everything to fulfill its potential. Those united with all existence maintain inner peace even when entangled with external matters. Deliberately pursuing transcendence ironically creates new bonds, while accord with nature accomplishes all things.

The term "Profound Darkness" (Xuanming, denoting the mysterious state of the Dao) signifies "nothingness," yet not absolute void. Those who seek "nothingness" through names remain trapped in conceptualization. Even attaining the state of "Profound Darkness" proves insufficient—one must advance further to "Vast Emptiness" (Canliao, an even more formless realm), which represents true profundity. The Dao of nature must be comprehended progressively—from shallow to deep, coarse to refined. Only after passing through seven levels can one understand "nothingness," and nine levels to develop doubt about "nothingness," marking the true beginning of Dao cultivation.

The passage then recounts a parable: Four friends—Zisi, Ziyu, Zili, and Zilai—discuss who could regard "nothingness" as the head, life as the spine, and death as the tail. Recognizing life, death, existence, and perishing as one continuum, they become companions. Later, when Ziyu falls ill with a grotesquely deformed body, he remains cheerful. He declares that if the Creator turned his left arm into a rooster, he'd use it to herald dawn; if his right arm became a slingshot, he'd hunt birds to roast; if his buttocks transformed into wheels, he'd ride them with spirit as his steed—thus finding greater freedom. This illustrates how Dao-realized individuals embrace natural transformations with transcendent equanimity.

時也失者順也安時而處順哀樂不能入也 此古之所謂縣解也而不能自解者物有結 之且夫物不勝天久矣吾又何惡焉 郭註沴陵亂也夫任自然之變者無嗟也與  物嗟耳浸漸也體化之變則無徃而不因  無因而不可當所遇之時世謂之得時不  暫停順徃而去世謂之失安時處順謂之  懸解一不能自解則衆物共結之矣能解  則無所不解則無所而解也天不能無晝  夜我安能無死生而惡之哉 俄而子來有病喘喘(一作/惴)然將死其妻子環 而泣之犂徃問之曰叱避無怛化倚其户與 之語曰偉哉造化又將奚以汝爲將奚以汝 適以汝爲鼠肝乎以汝爲蟲臂乎子來曰父 母於子東西南北唯命之從隂陽於人不翅 於父母彼近吾死而我不聽我則悍(一作/捍)矣 彼何罪焉夫大塊載我以形勞我以生佚我 以老息我以死故善吾生者乃所以善吾死 也今大冶鑄金金踴躍曰我且必爲鏌□大 冶必以爲不祥之金今一犯人之形而曰人 耳人耳夫造化者必以爲不祥之人今一以 天地爲大爐以造化爲大冶惡乎徃而不可 哉成然寐蘧然覺 郭註死生猶寤寐耳於理當寐不願人驚之  將化而叱無爲不之也自古或有能違父  母之命者未有能連隂陽之變而距晝夜  之節者也死生猶晝夜未足爲遠也時當
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist wisdom of harmonizing with nature and transcending life and death. Through the story of Zilai, Zhuangzi illustrates the philosophy of "being at peace with the times and following the natural course."

Human life and death are as natural as the alternation of day and night. If one can follow natural laws without resisting the transformations of life and death, one attains the state of "suspended liberation" (transcending bondage). Those who cannot free themselves often become shackled by external things. Since all beings in heaven and earth are subject to natural laws, why should we despise life and death?

When Zilai lay gravely ill approaching death, his family gathered weeping around him. Li (likely Zhuangzi's fictional character) came to visit and stood at the doorway saying: "Do not disturb this natural transformation!" He then said to Zilai: "How marvelous is the Creator! What will It transform you into next? Will you become a rat's liver or an insect's arm?" Zilai replied: "Children obey their parents' arrangements, but humans must follow the transformations of Yin-Yang even more. Now nature decrees my death—to resist would be to oppose heavenly principle. Heaven and earth gave me form, made me experience life's toils, used old age to grant me rest, and now use death to grant me repose. Therefore, those who cherish life should likewise cherish death."

Zhuangzi employs the metaphor of a blacksmith casting swords: If metal were to leap up declaring "I must become a precious sword," the smith would consider this ominous. Similarly, if humans stubbornly cling to maintaining human form, the Creator would deem them inauspicious. If we regard heaven and earth as a great furnace and creation as the supreme craftsman, then we can peacefully accept whatever form we assume. Death is like peaceful sleep—awakening brings new life.

Guo Xiang's commentary observes: Life and death are like the cycle of waking and sleeping—when sleep comes, do not resist. Since ancient times, some have disobeyed their parents' commands, but none can alter the laws of Yin-Yang or resist day and night's alternation. The Dao of life and death is actually quite near—as ordinary as the turning of day into night.

 死亦非所禁而横有不聽之心適足悍逆  於理以速其死耳其死之逺由於我悍非  死之罪也彼謂死耳在生故以死爲彼善  吾生善吾死理常俱也人耳人耳唯願爲  人也亦猶金之踊躍世皆知金之不祥而  不能任其自化夫變化之道靡所不遇今  一遇人形豈故爲哉生非故爲時自生耳  矜而有之不亦妄乎人皆知金之有係爲  不祥故明己之無異於金則所係之情可  解可解則無不可也成然寐籧然覺寤寐  自若不可以死生累心也 子桑户孟子反子琴張三人相與友曰孰能 相與於無相與相爲於無相爲敦能登天遊 霧撓裊挑(徒堯/反)無極相忘以生無所終窮三 人相視而笑莫逆於心遂相與友莫然有間 而子桑户死未葬孔子聞之使子貢徃待事 焉或編曲或鼓琴相和而歌曰嗟來桑户乎 嗟來桑户乎而己反其眞而我猶爲人徛子 貢趨而進曰敢問臨尸而歌禮乎二人相視 而笑曰是惡知禮意子貢反以告孔子曰彼 何人者耶修行無有而外其形骸臨尸而歌 顔色不變無以命之彼何人者邪孔子曰彼 遊方之外者也而丘遊方之内者也外内不 相及而丘使女徃弔之丘則陋矣彼方且與 造物者爲人而遊乎天地之一氣彼以生爲 附贅縣疣以死爲决𤴯換潰癰夫若然者又 惡知死生先後之所在假於異物託於同體
Interpretation

Death is not something forbidden, yet people stubbornly resist it. This attitude of defying natural principle only hastens one's demise. Death comes precisely because we resist it—there is nothing inherently wrong with death itself. People always treat death as life's opposite, when in fact life and death are two aspects of the same truth. O man, o man! You cling desperately to human form, like molten metal leaping in the furnace (ancient people considered the jumping of melting metal an ill omen). All know such unnatural metal movements portend misfortune, yet refuse to follow nature's transformations. The principle of universal transformation operates everywhere—that we temporarily assume human form now is hardly by conscious design. Life isn't deliberately created; it emerges when conditions ripen. To grow arrogant about this is utterly absurd. All recognize metal's unnatural restraint as ominous—realize you're no different from metal, and attachments may be released. Released from attachments, one follows nature effortlessly: sleeping peacefully, awakening naturally, undisturbed by life or death.

When Zisang Hu, Mengzi Fan, and Ziqin Zhang became friends, they said: "Who can associate without deliberate association? Act without conscious action? Who can roam beyond the heavens, pierce through mists and clouds, wandering carefree in the infinite while forgetting life's boundaries?" The three smiled at each other, hearts in accord, and thus became close companions. Soon Zisang Hu died. Before burial, Confucius sent Zigong to assist with funeral rites. There he found Mengzi Fan composing songs while Ziqin Zhang played the zither, singing together: "Ah, Zisang Hu! You've returned to your true origin while we remain trapped in human form!" Zigong approached asking: "Is singing before a corpse proper ritual conduct?" The two exchanged smiles: "What do you know of ritual's true meaning?" When Zigong reported this to Confucius, the sage said: "They dwell beyond worldly conventions while I remain within them. The inner and outer realms don't communicate—my sending you to mourn shows my shallowness. They companion with the Creator, wandering amidst heaven and earth's primordial Qi (vital energy), viewing life as an unnecessary growth and death as the bursting of a boil. Such people—how could they care about life's sequence? They simply lodge the same essence in different forms."

忘其肝膽遺其耳目反覆終始不知端倪芒 然彷徨乎塵垢之外逍遥乎無爲之業彼又 惡能憒憒然爲世俗之體以觀衆人之耳曰 哉子貢曰然則夫子何方之依曰丘天之戮 民也雖然吾與汝共之子貢曰敢問其方孔 子曰魚相造乎水人相造乎道相造乎水者 穿池而養給相造乎道者無事而生定故曰 魚相忘乎江湖人相忘乎道術子貢曰敢問 畸人曰畸人者畸於人而侔於天故曰天之 小人人之君子人之君子天之小人也 郭註夫體天地冥變化者雖手足異任五臟  殊管未嘗相與而百節同和斯相與於無  相與也未嘗相爲而表裏俱濟斯相爲於  無相爲也若乃從其心志以恤手足運其  股肱以營五臟則相營愈篤而外内愈困  矣故以天下爲一體者無愛爲於其間也  撓挑無極無所不任也忘其生則無不忘  矣故能隨變任化無所窮竟相視而笑莫  逆於心者寄明至親而無愛念之近情也  人哭亦哭俗内之迹也齊死生忘哀樂臨  尸能歌方外之志也夫知禮義者必遊外  以經内守母以存子稱情而直徃也若乃  矜乎名聲牽乎形制則孝不任誠慈不任  實父子兄弟懐情相欺豈禮之大意哉夫  理有至極内外相冥未有極遊外之致而  不冥於内者也未有能冥於内而不遊於  外者也故聖人常遊外以弘内無心以順
Interpretation

This passage elucidates Zhuangzi's philosophy concerning transcending worldly concerns and attaining unity with the Dao (the Way).

It first describes a state of self-forgetfulness: one discards awareness of internal organs, abandons sensory perceptions, and loses track of beginnings and endings within cyclical transformations. Such a person rises above mundane existence, dwelling carefreely in the realm of wuwei (non-action). Why would such an individual toil anxiously like ordinary people or concern themselves with others' opinions?

When Zigong asked Confucius what path to follow, Confucius called himself "heaven's condemned one," yet expressed willingness to explore the question together. The fish-and-water analogy illustrates this: just as fish depend on water to survive, humans require the Dao to find peace. Like fish swimming freely in rivers and lakes, those immersed in Daoist practice achieve selfless transcendence.

The text explains the concept of the "ji-ren" (eccentric person): though differing from ordinary people, such individuals align with heavenly principles. Thus, those deemed gentlemen by worldly standards may be petty men in the Dao's eyes, and vice versa.

Guo Xiang's commentary further clarifies: those truly united with heaven and earth maintain harmonious integration while their bodily parts function independently. This harmony emerges spontaneously rather than through forced coordination—deliberate attempts create internal and external conflicts. The genuinely enlightened flow with transformations, unconstrained by limitations.

Finally, it discusses the essence of ritual propriety: true masters of etiquette balance inner authenticity with outer expression. Those obsessed with reputation and rigid forms turn familial bonds artificial. The supreme state unites inner and outer—sages manifest inner Dao-nature through outward conduct, responding to nature with wuxin (non-intentional) spontaneity.

 有故雖終日輝形而神氣無變俯仰萬機  而淡然自若夫見形而不及神者天下之  常累也是故覩其與群物並行則莫能謂  之遺物而離人矣觀其體化而應物則莫  能謂之坐忘而自得矣豈直謂聖人不然  哉乃必謂至理之無此是故莊子將明流  統之所宗以釋天下之可悟若直就稱仲  尼之如此或者將據所見以排之故超聖  人之内迹而寄方外于數子宜忘其所寄  以尋迷作之大意則夫遊外弘内之道坦  然自明而莊子之書故是超俗蓋世之談  矣夫弔者方内之近事也施之方外則陋  遊乎天地之一氣者皆冥之故無二也以  生爲附贅縣疣此氣之時聚非所樂也以  死爲决𤴯潰癰此氣之自散非所惜也死  生代謝未始有極與之俱徃則無徃不可  故不知勝負之所在假因也死生聚散變  化無方皆異物也無異而不假所假雖異  共成一體故忘肝膽遺耳目任理而冥徃  五藏猶忘何物足識哉未始有識故能放  身於變化之途玄同於反覆之波而不知  終始之所及也所謂無爲之業非拱默也  所謂塵垢之外非伏于山林也其所觀示  于衆人者皆其塵垢耳非方外之冥物也  子貢不聞性與天道故見其所依而不見  其所以依也夫所以依者不依也世豈覺  之哉戮民者以方内爲桎梏明所貴在方  外也夫遊外者依内離人者合俗故有天
Interpretation

Here Zhuangzi expounds a spiritual realm that transcends physical form. Those who are constantly occupied with worldly affairs, focusing solely on external appearances while neglecting inner spirit, will inevitably become entangled in mundane burdens. The truly enlightened, though living and moving among ordinary people, remain unbound by external things; while appearing to adapt to worldly changes, they actually attain the state of "sitting in forgetfulness" (a Daoist cultivation term referring to forgetting physical form and transcending the self-world dichotomy).

Using Confucius (Zhongni) as an example, Zhuangzi illustrates that if one directly claims sages have reached this state, people might deny it based on superficial observations. Therefore, he employs unconventional expressions, embedding the supreme truth within stories of those who dwell "beyond the square" (a realm transcending worldly conventions). Those whose hearts truly wander beyond conventional boundaries can better fulfill worldly responsibilities; those who seem aloof from the crowd actually harmonize perfectly with ordinary existence.

Life and death are like the gathering and dispersion of Qi. Life is merely the temporary coalescence of Qi—no need for excessive joy; death is simply Qi's natural dissipation—no cause for undue sorrow. The cycle of life and death has no end, and by aligning with this transformation, one becomes free from all discomfort. Even concrete organs like the liver, gallbladder, ears, and eyes aren't worth clinging to—one can forget even the five viscera (heart, liver, spleen, lungs, and kidneys). Only then can one roam freely along the path of transformation, merging completely with the great Dao.

True "Wuwei" (a core Daoist concept meaning non-coercive action in accordance with nature) isn't about doing nothing, and genuine transcendence doesn't require retreating to mountain forests. Zigong (Confucius's disciple), lacking understanding of inherent nature and heavenly Dao, could only perceive surface appearances. Those bound by worldly rituals see life "within the square" as shackles, revealing their latent appreciation for what lies beyond. The truly liberated actually dwell more comfortably in ordinary life—those who seem solitary are in fact in perfect harmony with the multitude.

 下者無以天下爲也是以遺物而後能入  群坐忘而後能應務愈遺之愈得之苟居  斯極則雖欲釋之而理固自來斯乃天人  之所不赦者也吾與汝共之言雖爲世梏  桎但爲與汝共之耳明己恒自在外也人  之與魚所造雖異其於由無事以得事自  方外以共内然後養給而生定莫不皆然  各自足而相忘也能遊外以冥内任萬物  之自然使天性各足而帝王道成斯乃畤  於人而侔於天也以自然言之則人無小 則大以又理言之則侔於天者可謂君子矣 顔回問仲尼曰孟孫才其於死哭泣無涕中 心不戚居喪不哀無是三者以善喪蓋魯國 固有無其實而得其名者乎回一怪之仲尼 曰夫孟孫氏盡之矣進於知矣滿簡之而不 得天己有所簡矣孟孫氏不知所以生不智 所以死不知就先不知就後若化爲物以待 其所不知之化已乎且方將化惡知不化哉 方將不化惡知已化哉吾特與汝其夢未始 覺者邪且彼有駭形而無損心有旦宅而無 情死孟孫氏特覺人哭亦哭是自其所以乃 且也相與吾之耳矣庸詎知吾所謂吾之乎 且汝夢爲鳥而厲乎天夢爲魚而汲於淵不 識今之言者其覺者乎其夢者乎造適不及 笑獻笑不及排安排而去化乃入於寥天一 郭註魯國觀其禮顏回察其心盡死生之理  應内外之宜者動而以天行非知之匹也
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist wisdom of "following what is natural" in human affairs. Mengsun Cai, a virtuous man of Lu, showed no tears or grief during his mother's funeral rites—an apparent breach of etiquette that actually revealed his higher spiritual attainment.

Zhuangzi, speaking through Confucius, explains: Mengsun Cai has transcended worldly understanding. He neither claims to comprehend life nor deliberately investigates death, simply following nature's transformations. Like our inability to distinguish dreams from reality—when you dream of being a bird soaring through skies or a fish swimming in waters, how can you be certain upon waking that this isn't another dream? The truly enlightened, like Mengsun Cai, maintain physical participation in funeral rites (startled form) while keeping their hearts undisturbed by sorrow (unharmed mind).

Three profound insights emerge: First, the highest way of living flows as naturally as fish through water—the less one forces things, the more one attains. Second, life and death alternate like day and night; clinging to grief resembles obsession with dreams. Finally, this principle applies to rulers governing states—letting all things develop spontaneously (allowing the natural course of myriad beings) constitutes governance aligned with the Dao (Heaven's Way).

Guo Xiang's commentary observes: While Lu's citizens saw only surface rituals, Yan Hui perceived the essence. Those truly penetrating life-death principles act according to natural patterns (Heaven's movement)—a state unattainable through deliberate study. Like Mengsun Cai, who followed mourning customs externally while maintaining inner detachment—this realm resembles dwelling in temporary lodging (dawn abode), never forming attachments to any circumstance.

 故曰進於知簡擇死生而不得其任無春  秋冬夏四時行耳已簡而不得故無不安  無不安故不以死生樂意而付之自化也  死生宛轉與化爲一猶以忘其所知於當  今豈待所未知無顏憂哉已化而生爲知  未生之時方化而死焉知己死之後故爲  所避就而與化俱生也夫死生猶覺男耳  今夢自以爲覺則無以明覺之非夢兄茍  無以明覺之非夢則亦無以明生之非死  矣死生覺夢未知所在當其所邇無不自  得何爲在此而憂彼哉有駭形無□心者  以變化爲形之駭動耳故不以死生損累  其心也有旦宅無情死者以形骸之變爲  旦宅之日新耳其情不以爲死也夫常覺  者無徃而有逆故人哭亦哭所以其所宜  也死生變化吾皆吾之既皆同吾吾何失  哉未始失吾吾何憂哉無賖故人哭亦哭  無憂故哭而不哀靡所開吾也故玄同外  内彌貫古今與化日新豈知吾之所在也  夢爲鳥夢爲魚言無徃而不自得也覺夢  之化無徃而不可則死生之故亦無時而  足惜也所造皆適則忘適矣故不及笑排  者推移之謂禮哭必哀獻笑必樂哀樂存  懷則不能與適推移矣今孟孫常適故哭  而不哀與化俱徃也安於推移而與化俱  去故乃入于寂寥而與天爲一也自此以  上至于子祀其致一也所執之喪異故歌  哭不同
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here explores the relationship between life and death, awakening and dreaming, considering them all as part of natural transformation.

Life and death are as natural as the alternation of day and night, requiring no deliberate distinction. The truly enlightened understand that life and death are merely changes in form ("transformation"), like a house being renovated daily ("daily renewal"), while the essence never perishes. Thus, there is no need for excessive grief in the face of death—just as one feels at ease when dreaming of becoming a bird or a fish.

The text mentions how Mengsunshi (a Daoist figure) wept at a funeral yet felt no sorrow, precisely because he had merged with the natural process of transformation ("journeying with transformation"). Ordinary people cling to the formalities of mourning, experiencing genuine grief or joy, while those who comprehend the Dao follow the flow of change—their tears are merely a response to the occasion, unburdened by inner attachment.

From Zisi (a fictional enlightened figure created by Zhuangzi) to Mengsunshi, these sages may express themselves differently (through song or weeping), but their understanding of life and death is the same—they recognize that life and death are merely different states within the natural cycle, as inevitable as the turning of the seasons. The truly awakened are never troubled by the question of life and death, for they have already become one with the transformations of heaven and earth ("united with Heaven").

意而子見許由許由曰堯何以資汝意而子 曰堯謂我汝必躬服仁義而明言是非許由 曰而奚來爲軹咫天堯既己黥汝以仁義而 劓汝以是非矣汝將何以遊夫遥湯恣睢轉 備之塗乎意而子曰雖然吾願遊於其藩許 由曰不然夫盲者無以與乎眉目顔色之好 瞽者無以與乎青黄黼黻之觀意而子曰夫 無莊之夫其美攄梁之失其力黄帝之亡其 知皆在罏鍾之間耳庸詎知夫造物者之不 息我黔而補我劓使我乘成以隨先生邪許 由曰噫未可知也我爲汝言其大略吾師乎 吾師乎𩐎萬物而不爲義澤及萬世而不爲 仁長於上古而不爲老覆載天地刻雕衆形 而不爲巧此所遊己 郭註資者給濟之謂黔以仁義劓以是非言  其以形教自虧殘而不能復遊夫自得之  場無係之塗也游其藩言不敢求涉中道  也且願遊其藩傍而已天下之物未必皆  自成也自然之理亦有須冶煆而爲器者  故無莊據梁黄帝皆聞道而後亡其所務  也此皆寄言以遣云爲之累夫率性直徃  者自然也徃而傷性性傷而能改者亦自  然也庸詎知我之自然當不息黔補劓而  乘可成之道以隨夫子邪而欲棄而勿告  恐非造物之至也𩐎澤萬物皆自爾耳亦  無愛爲於其問也安所寄其仁義不爲老  日新也不爲巧自然也此所遊已言遊於  不爲而師於無師也
Interpretation

Yi Erzi (a fictional character) went to visit Xu You (an ancient recluse), who asked him: "What did Yao (the sage king) teach you?" Yi Erzi replied: "Yao instructed me to personally practice benevolence and righteousness, and to clearly distinguish right from wrong."

Xu You disapprovingly said: "Then why have you come to see me? Yao has already tattooed your face with benevolence and righteousness (metaphor for forced indoctrination), and cut off your nose with concepts of right and wrong (metaphor for mental constraints). How can you possibly roam freely in the carefree, unconstrained realm now?" Yi Erzi responded: "Even so, I still wish to approach the fringes of such a state."

Xu You offered an analogy: "The blind cannot appreciate the beauty of brows and eyes, the deaf cannot perceive the splendor of colorful patterns." Yi Erzi countered: "The ancient beauty Wu Zhuang forgot her own loveliness, the mighty Ju Liang ceased boasting of his strength, and the Yellow Emperor (legendary ancestor of Chinese civilization) abandoned his cleverness—all achieved this state after being tempered in the furnace of transformation. Who can say the Creator won't restore my tattooed face and replace my severed nose, allowing me to follow you as my teacher?"

Xu You sighed: "Alas, that's hard to predict. Let me tell you the truth of the Dao: My great teacher! He harmonizes all things yet doesn't claim righteousness, bestows blessings for generations yet doesn't presume benevolence, predates antiquity yet shows no signs of aging, upholds heaven and earth while shaping all creatures yet displays no artifice. This is the true realm of perfect freedom."

Guo Xiang (commentator) explains: Here "tattooing" symbolizes how benevolence and righteousness constrain people, while "nose-cutting" represents how right/wrong distinctions harm them—both referring to how artificial teachings damage natural innocence. "Roaming the fringes" means not daring to hope for full attainment of the Dao, only seeking proximity. Like vessels requiring smelting and tempering, Wu Zhuang, Ju Liang and the Yellow Emperor all relinquished their original attachments after realizing the Dao. The entire passage emphasizes following natural disposition—preserving one's nature is natural, and correcting oneself after losing it is also natural. Xu You's final description of "harmonizing all things" etc. all manifest the Dao's spontaneous operation, needing no deliberate promotion of benevolence/righteousness, showing no aging because of daily renewal, displaying no artifice because it's inherently natural. This is true freedom—taking wuwei (non-action) as the ultimate state, and "no teacher" as the great teacher.

顔回曰回益矣仲尼曰何謂也曰回忘仁義 矣曰可矣猶未也它日復見曰回益矣曰何 謂也曰回忘禮樂矣曰可矣猶未也它日復 見曰回益矣曰何謂也曰回坐忘矣仲尼蹴 然曰何謂坐忘顔回曰墮隳枝體黜聦明離 形去知同於大通此謂坐忘仲尼曰同則無 好也化則無常也而果其賢乎丘也請從而 後也 郭註回益矣以損之爲益也仁者兼愛之迹  義者成物之功愛之非仁仁迹行焉成之  非義義功見焉存夫仁義不足以知愛利  之由無心故忘之可也但忘功迹猶未玄  達禮者形體之用樂者樂生之具忘其貝  未若忘其所以具也夫坐忘者奚所不忘  哉既忘其迹又忘其所以迹者内不覺其  一身外不知有天地然復曠然與變化爲  體而無不通也無物不同則未嘗不適未  嘗不適何好何惡哉同於化者唯化所適  故無常也 子輿與子桑友而霖雨十日子輿曰子桑殆 病矣裏飯而徃視之至子桑之門則若歌若 哭鼓琴曰父邪母邪天乎人乎有不任其聲 而趨促舉其詩焉子輿入曰子之歌詩何故 若是曰吾恩夫使我至此極者而弗得也父 母豈欲吾貧哉天無私覆地無私載天地豈 私貧我哉求其爲之者而不得也然而至此 極者命也夫 郭註此二人相爲於無相爲者也今裹飯而  徃食者亦任之天理而自爾非相爲而後
Interpretation

Yan Hui (Confucius' disciple) said to Confucius: "I have progressed." Confucius asked: "How so?" Yan Hui replied: "I have forgotten humaneness and righteousness." Confucius said: "Good, but not enough." Several days later, Yan Hui again said: "I have progressed." Asked for explanation, he said: "I have forgotten ritual and music." Confucius said: "Better, but still insufficient." After more days, Yan Hui once more declared: "I have progressed," adding: "I have attained zuowang (sitting in forgetfulness)." Startled, Confucius asked: "What is zuowang?"

Yan Hui explained: "I relax my limbs, dismiss sensory perceptions, leave behind physical form, eliminate intellectual distinctions, and merge completely with the Great Dao (Da) - this is zuowang." Confucius marveled: "In unity with Dao there are no preferences; in accordance with transformation there is no rigidity. Truly you have reached the ultimate! I shall follow and learn from you."

Commentator Guo Xiang explains: Yan Hui's "progress" was achieved through progressive subtraction. Humaneness and righteousness are but manifestations of love and means for accomplishment - clinging to these forms remains superficial. Ritual and music are instruments for regulating conduct - forgetting the instruments themselves is inferior to forgetting the motivation behind their use. True zuowang means clinging to nothing, forgetting both external manifestations and their internal causes. Thus one merges with the transformations of heaven and earth, becoming omnipervasive. Identifying with the myriad things eliminates preferences; following transformations removes stubbornness.

Another story follows: Ziyu and Zisang were friends. After ten consecutive rainy days, Ziyu, worried Zisang might starve, packed food and went to see him. At Zisang's door, he heard what sounded like singing mixed with weeping, accompanied by agitated zither music. Zisang chanted: "Was it my parents? Was it heaven? Why have I come to such extremity?" His voice nearly lost its musicality. Entering, Ziyu asked: "Why such melancholy in your song?" Zisang replied: "I was pondering who brought me to this desperate state. Would parents wish their child impoverished? Heaven and earth impartially shelter all - would they single me out for poverty? Seeking the cause leads nowhere - it must simply be ming (destiny)."

Guo Xiang comments: Their friendship arose naturally. Ziyu's food delivery sprang from instinctive accord with heavenly principle, not deliberate intention.

 徃也何故若是者嫌其有情所以趨出逺  理也命也夫言物皆自然無爲之者也   應帝王第七 齧缺問於王倪四問而四不知齧缺因躍而 大喜行以告蒲衣子蒲衣子曰而乃今知之 乎有虞氏不及泰氏有虞氏其猶藏仁以要 (平/聲)人亦得人矣而未始出於非人泰氏其卧 徐徐其覺教于于一以己爲馬一以己爲牛 其知情信其德甚真而未始入於非人 郭註夫有虞之與泰氏皆世事之迹耳非所  以迹也所以迹者無迹也世孰名之哉未  之嘗名何勝負之有故乘群變履萬世世  有夷險迹有不及也夫以所好爲是人所  惡爲非人者以是非爲域者也能出於非  人之域者必入於無非人之境矣故無得  無失無可無不可豈直藏仁而要人邪爲  馬爲牛則奚是人非人之有任其自知故  情信任其自得故無爲不入乎是非之域  所以絶於有虞之世也 肩吾見狂接輿狂接輿曰日中始何以語汝 肩吾曰告我君人者以己出經式義度人孰 敢不聽而化諸狂接輿曰是欺德也其於治 天下也猶涉海鑿河而使蚊負山也夫聖人 之治也治外乎正而後行确乎能其事者而 已矣且鳥高飛以避矰弋之害鼷鼠深穴乎 神丘之下以避熏鑿之患而曾二蟲之無知 郭註欺德者以己制物則物失其眞也夫寄  當於萬物則無事而自成以一身制天下
Interpretation

This passage presents Zhuangzi's critique of rulers' governance methods through several allegorical stories that illustrate the principle of natural non-action (Wuwei).

Nie Que consulted Wang Ni but received no answers to his four questions, yet joyfully went to report this to Pu Yizi. Pu Yizi remarked: "Now you finally understand? Emperor Shun (the Youyu clan) was inferior to Fu Xi (the Tai clan). Shun still clung to benevolent concepts to win people's hearts—though he gained popular support, he never transcended artificial effort. Fu Xi slept in tranquil contentment and awoke in leisurely ease, letting others call him horse or ox as they pleased. His wisdom was genuinely trustworthy, his virtue (De) utterly natural, never entangled in artificial distinctions of right and wrong."

Guo Xiang's commentary explains: Both Shun and Fu Xi's deeds represent human artifice—the true Dao leaves no traces. People habitually judge things as right or wrong, but only those surpassing such judgments can enter the realm beyond distinctions. Like accepting being called horse or ox without concern for external evaluations, following nature preserves one's authentic essence.

In another story, Jian Wu met the madman Jie Yu. Jian Wu said: "Zhong Shi told me that rulers need only establish laws and norms—who among the people would dare disobey such edification?" Jie Yu retorted: "This deceives people's virtue (De). Governing like this resembles trying to cross the sea by digging a river, or making mosquitoes carry mountains—utterly absurd. The sage governs by first rectifying himself before influencing others, only acting within his capacity. Observe how birds know to fly high avoiding arrows, and mice dig deep to escape smoke—are humans less intelligent than these small creatures?"

Guo Xiang's annotation clarifies: Imposing personal will upon all things makes them lose their inherent nature. Letting all beings fulfill their natural roles achieves completion without deliberate action. Attempting to control the world through individual power is as impossible as making mosquitoes carry mountains.

 則功莫就而任不勝也故聖人之治也全  其分内各正性命而己不爲其所不能也  且禽獸猶各有以自存故帝王任之而不  爲則自成也汝曾不如此二蟲之各存而  不待教乎 筆乘日中始人姓名經之式義之度皆所以  正人也而離性已逺故謂之欺德涉海必  溺鑿河難成蚊負山則不勝任以欺德而  治天下亦猶此耳聖人之治也治因其自  治而毋以正人爲也故曰外乎正而後行  斷斷然盡其性命之能事而已矣性命之  能事我無爲而民自正之謂也夫鳥鼠避  患曾不待教况民之有知豈不如二蟲而  必作爲經式義度以拂亂其常性哉 天根遊於殷陽至蓼了水之上適遭無名人 而問焉曰請問爲天下無名人曰去汝鄙人 也何問之不豫也予方將與造物者爲人厭 則又乘夫莽眇之鳥以出六極之外而遊無 何有之郷以處壙垠之野汝又何帠詣以治 天下感予之心爲又復問無名人曰汝遊心 於淡合氣於漠順物自然而無容私焉而天 下治矣 郭註問爲天下則非超於太初止於玄冥也  與造化者爲人則任人之自爲莽渺群碎  之謂耳乘群碎馳萬物故能出處常通放  毋自得之場不治而自治也遊心於淡任  其性而無所飾也合氣於漠漠然靜於性  而止也順物無私而天下治言任性自生  公也心欲益之私也容私果不足以生生
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here employs several parables to expound the political philosophy of "governing through non-action (Wuwei)." He argues that forcibly regulating society through rites and laws is as futile as making a mosquito carry a mountain or digging a river in the ocean.

The sage's governance follows the innate nature of all things. Just as birds and beasts instinctively know how to survive without human instruction, and rodents avoid harm by natural instinct—are the common people's wisdom inferior to these small creatures? Imposing countless rules and regulations only disrupts their spontaneous nature.

The text recounts how a man named Tian Gen sought advice on governing from Nameless Man. The latter criticized his utilitarian approach, revealing he was about to accompany the Creator astride an ethereal bird beyond the six directions, journeying to the Land of Nothingness (symbolizing the realm of Dao). This implies true governance requires transcendence beyond worldly calculations.

Nameless Man's essential advice is: "Keep your mind placid, your Qi (vital energy) empty and still. Follow the natural course of all things without selfish interference, and the world will govern itself." Guo Xiang (a Jin Dynasty commentator) elaborates that this means letting people live according to their innate nature—without artificial embellishments, maintaining emptiness and stillness, thus achieving impartiality through natural accord.

Key terms here include: "false virtue (Qi De)" denoting morality that violates innate nature; "Land of Nothingness" representing Dao's formless realm; and "six extremities" (Liu Ji) referring to the spatial dimensions. These concepts embody Zhuangzi's rejection of artificial interference and advocacy for natural non-action.

 而順公乃全也 筆乘豫即凡事豫則立之豫言有先于爲天  下者也無以先之而求爲天下于天下則  後矣與造物者爲人與化俱運任而不助  也乘莽渺出六極凌虛履妙超隂陽也遊  何有處壙垠造道之域居空同也此即豫  之道也而猶不寤故又明言以示之遊心  者汎然自得而復于至靜也故曰遊心于  淡合氣者其息深深而歸于至虛也故曰  合氣于漠此皆順物自然而不以已與之  故天下治蓋無意于爲天下而爲天下之  道莫妙于此矣 陽子居見老聃曰有人於此嚮疾彊梁物徹 䟽明學道不倦如是者可比明王乎老聃曰 是於聖人也胥易技係勞形怵心者也且也 虎豹之文來田猿狙之便執斄之狗來藉如 是者可比明王乎陽子居蹴然曰敢問明王 之治老聃曰明王之治功蓋天下而似不自 己化貸萬物而民弗恃有莫舉名使物自喜 立乎不測而遊于無有者也鄭有神巫曰季 咸知人之死生存亡禍福壽夭期以歲月旬 日若神鄭人見之皆棄而走列子見之而心 醉歸以告壺子曰始吾以夫子之道爲至矣 則又有至焉者矣壺子曰吾與汝既其文未 既其實而固得道與衆雌而無雄而又奚卵 焉而以道與世亢必信夫故使人得而相汝 嘗試與來以予示之明日列子與之見壺子 岀而謂列子曰嘻子之先生死矣弗活矣不
Interpretation

The text from Zhuangzi Yi expounds the philosophy of following nature and governing through non-action (Wuwei). The phrase "following the public leads to completeness" means that only by adhering to natural laws can one preserve wholeness. Just as preparation is key to success ("everything established through forethought"), true wisdom lies in grasping the patterns of the Dao's movement before taking action. Those who react only after events unfold are already lagging behind.

Those who have truly attained the Dao walk alongside the Creator ("Maker of Things"), moving in harmony with natural transformations—accommodating without interference. They transcend the confines of the six directions (up, down, and the four cardinal points), ride the void, command the mysterious, and rise above the duality of Yin-Yang. This state is like wandering in the boundless "Land of Nothingness" or dwelling in the luminous clarity of the "Realm of Emptiness." Such is the highest manifestation of "forethought" (yu)—anticipating and aligning with the Dao beforehand.

The text also describes meditative states like "letting the mind roam in tranquility" and "merging Qi with stillness," where the heart returns to utmost serenity and breath settles into profound emptiness. These embody the principle of following the natural state of all things without imposing personal will. The most sublime way of governance is precisely to rule effortlessly through non-action.

Later, the narrative recounts a dialogue between Yang Ziju (Yang Zhu) and Laozi (Lao Dan). Yang Zhu asks: "If someone is quick-witted, resolute, perceptive, and tirelessly studious, could such a person compare to an enlightened ruler?" Laozi replies: "To the sage, these are merely the toils of a technician." Just as tigers and leopards are hunted for their fur, monkeys captured for their agility, and hounds exploited for their skills—how can such talents rival a sage-king?

A true sage-king governs the world with achievements that cover all directions yet seem unrelated to himself. He nurtures all beings without the people feeling dependent, attains no fame yet lets all things find joy in themselves. He stands upon the unfathomable and wanders in the realm of nothingness.

The final episode tells of Ji Xian, a famed diviner from Zheng who could predict life, death, fortune, and misfortune with godlike precision. Liezi (Lie Yukou), awestruck after witnessing this, reports back to his teacher Huzi. Huzi points out: "You've only seen the surface craft, not the substance. Without the rooster's presence, how can the hen hatch eggs? Contending with the world through Daoist arts only exposes oneself." Later, Huzi demonstrates four distinct states of being, leaving Ji Xian utterly unable to discern his fate and fleeing in defeat. This story illustrates how those who embody the Dao are endlessly transformative, surpassing all ordinary measures.

以旬數矣吾見怪焉見濕灰焉列子入泣涕 沾襟以告壺子壺子曰𡖥吾示之以地文萌 乎不震不正是殆見吾杜德機也嘗又與來 明日又與之見壺子出而謂列子曰幸矣子 之先生遇我也有廖矣全然有生矣吾見其 杜權矣列子入以告壺子壺子曰郷吾示之 以天壤名實不入而機發于踵是殆見吾善 者機也嘗又與來明日又與之見壺子出而 謂列子曰子之先生不齊吾無得而相焉試 齊且復相之列子入以告壺子壺子曰吾郷 示之以太沖莫勝是殆見吾衡氣機也鯢桓 之審爲淵止水之審爲淵流水之審爲淵淵 有九名此處三焉嘗又與來明日又與之見 壺子立未定自失而走壼子曰追之列子追 之不及反以報壺子曰已滅矣已失矣吾弗 及己壺子曰郷吾示之以未始出吾宗吾與 之虛而委蛇不知其誰何因以爲弔靡因以 爲波流故逃也然後列子自以爲未始學而 歸三年不出爲其妻爨食豕如食人于是無 與親彫琢復朴塊然獨以其形立紛而封哉 一以是終 昊言箴曰此章專論帝王之道言帝王合應  如秦氏之出于非人而又非入于非人如  接與之戒矰弋熏鑿吾民如無名氏所云  游心于淡合氣于漠如老聃所云立乎不  測而遊于無有所謂無有亦只是至虛而  不萌竅鑿是已緫來只無有二字耳四不
Interpretation

This passage recounts the story of Liezi (a prominent Daoist figure) studying under his teacher Master Huzi, illustrating four realms of Daoist cultivation:

Liezi was amazed when the physiognomist Jixian demonstrated the ability to predict life and death. Master Huzi then instructed Liezi to bring Jixian for a reading. During the first encounter, Huzi displayed the "Earthly Script" realm (a state of stillness like undisturbed earth), prompting Jixian to declare that Huzi looked like "damp ashes" and would soon die. In the second demonstration of the "Heavenly Soil" realm (sprouting vitality), Jixian noted improvement. When Huzi revealed the "Grand Equilibrium" (Taichong) realm (Qi in perfect Yin-Yang balance), the physiognomist became utterly perplexed. Finally, when Huzi manifested the supreme state of "Not Yet Emerged from My Origin" (complete unity with the Dao), Jixian fled in terror.

Master Huzi explained that he simply followed natural transformations—like grass bending with wind or water flowing with currents—making himself incomprehensible to Jixian. Through this, Liezi realized true Dao cannot be attained through deliberate study. He subsequently retreated from society for three years, tending his stove and feeding pigs with the same reverence as serving humans, returning to primal simplicity and merging with all existence.

The conclusion draws parallels to governance: Rulers should emulate the undifferentiated state of Hundun (Chaos), unconstrained by worldly conventions; follow Jieyu's advice to avoid harming the people; maintain the nameless sage's mental serenity; and root themselves in Laozi's "immeasurable Dao." Ultimately, this means abiding in the "Non-Being" (Wu You) realm—acting through non-action (Wuwei) and flowing with nature's course.

 知是無竅鑿曜而喜是悟出無竅鑿道理  非人天也未能出于非人者猶局于人未  出于天未始入于非人者與天俱化非有  意爲天徐徐安穩于于自得此四字最善  狀凡人間間然日以心鬥者卧則神且不  寧或驚或夢殊不帖席纔覺則百憂感心  身雖未起神已馳逐拘攣不自在了至人  便無此光景便是其寢不夢其覺無憂道  理呼牛應牛呼馬應馬隨呼而應初無所  定故下兩一字道有情有信故曰其知情  信曰情曰信曰眞緫是對幻字看以己出  其動也天其靜也地其行也水流其止也  淵默淵默之與水流天行之與地止其于  不爲而自爾一也今季咸見其尸居而坐  忘即謂之將死見其神動而天隨即謂之  有生誠能應不以心而理自玄符與化升  降而以世爲量然後足爲物主而順時無  極故非相者所測耳此應帝王之大意也  德機不發曰杜權亦機也今乃自覺昨日  之所見見其杜權故謂之將死也天壤之  中覆載之功見矣比之地文不猶外乎此  應感之容也任自然而覆載則天機玄應  而利名之飾皆爲棄物機發於踵常在極  上起也發而善於彼彼乃見之居太沖之  極浩然泊心而玄同萬方故勝負莫得措  其間也無徃不平混然一之以管窺天者  莫見其涯故似不齊也淵者靜默之謂耳  夫水常無心委順外物雖流之與止鯢桓
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here describes the realm of those who have attained the Dao. Those who truly comprehend the Great Way are like uncarved natural cavities (symbolizing the state of Wuwei, non-action), their joy arising from realizing this innate principle.

Practitioners who haven't yet reached the "non-human" realm remain confined by human limitations, unable to fully merge with the Heavenly Dao. But those truly united with Heaven need no deliberate effort to synchronize naturally with cosmic transformations. Their serene contentment stands in stark contrast to worldly people consumed by scheming—these troubled souls experience restless sleep filled with startling awakenings or dreams, then face waking hours burdened by anxieties, their spirits racing before their bodies even rise.

Dao-attained individuals are entirely different: they dream not in sleep and harbor no worries upon waking. Like responding "ox" when called an ox or "horse" when addressed as such, they conform to external designations while remaining inwardly unbound. This authentic state forms a vivid contrast with the illusory human world.

Their movements flow as naturally as Heaven's revolutions, their stillness resembles Earth's stability. In action, they're like smoothly running water; at rest, like silent abysses. This Wuwei naturalness constitutes perfect unity. When the physiognomist Ji Xian (from Zhuangzi's stories) observed practitioners in meditative self-forgetting, he mistook them for dying; witnessing their spirit-Heaven communion, he imagined them bursting with vitality.

True Dao masters need no deliberate mental effort to align with heavenly principles. Following cosmic transformations unrestrained by worldly standards, they become sovereigns of all things, responding endlessly to circumstance. This realm transcends superficial observation—it embodies the true meaning of "responding as emperors" (governing by conforming to nature).

When inner De (virtuous power) remains unmanifested, it's called "hidden pivot"—the profound mechanism of Dao's operation. Just as Heaven-Earth embrace all things, Dao-realized individuals preserve their natural essence, considering fame and ornamentation superfluous. True mystery originates from the heel (symbolizing fundamental emergence), dwelling in the ultimate Void, with minds vast and tranquil, unified with all existence—thus transcending competition.

Those peering at Heaven through bamboo tubes see not its entirety, hence deem it incomplete. The abyss's silence resembles water's effortless conformity—whether flowing or still, it maintains its original nature.

 之與龍躍常淵然自若未始失其靜默也  至人用舍雖異玄默一焉故略舉三異以  明之雖波流九變治亂紛如居其極者常  淡然自得泊乎忘爲也未始出吾宗者雖  變化無常深根寧極也委蛇者無心而隨  物化也不知誰何汎然無所係也變化頽  靡世事波流無徃而不因也夫至人一耳  然應世變而時動故相者無所措其目自  失而走此明應帝王者無方也食豕如食  人忘貴賤也於事無與親唯所遇也雕琢  復朴去華取實也塊然形立外飾去也紛  而封哉雖動而眞不散也一以是終使物  各自終也 筆乘不震不正崔本作不震不止全然列子  作灰然莫勝列子作莫朕審列子作潘無  與親列子作無親封哉列子作封戎似于  文義爲優當從之 無爲名尸無爲謀府無爲事任無爲知主體 盡無窮而遊無朕盡其所受乎天而無見得 亦虛而已至人之用心若鏡不將不迎應 而不藏故能勝物而不傷 郭註無爲名尸因物則物各自當其名也無  爲謀府使物各自謀也無爲事任付物使  各自任也無爲知主無心則物各自主一  知也體盡無窮因天下之自爲故馳萬物  而無窮也遊無朕任物故無迹也盡其所  受乎天足則止也無見得見得則不知止  也亦虛而已不虛則不能任群實也若鏡  者鑒物而無情也不將不迎不藏來即應
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here describes the state of being of the "Perfected Person" (one who has attained the highest level of Daoist cultivation). Like a dragon silently preserving its true nature while submerged in deep waters, the Perfected Person maintains inner tranquility and detachment regardless of circumstances. When facing worldly changes, they exhibit three distinctive qualities: first, like flowing water that remains pure at its source; second, adapting to external transformations without becoming entangled; third, seeing through worldly disturbances while preserving their authentic self.

The Perfected Person follows five fundamental principles: not pursuing empty reputation (Wuwei as the corpse of fame), not scheming (Wuwei as the storehouse of plots), not forcing actions (Wuwei as the burden of affairs), not flaunting cleverness (Wuwei as the master of knowledge). They align with the natural order like a mirror reflecting objects—showing things as they come and leaving no trace when they go. Thus they engage with all things without being harmed by external phenomena.

The phrase "eating pork as if eating human food" illustrates the Perfected Person's absence of hierarchical distinctions; "carving then returning to simplicity" refers to shedding ornamentation to regain authenticity; "standing like an uncarved block" describes their preservation of natural form. The text ultimately emphasizes the Perfected Person's mind being empty as a mirror—this emptiness is not vacuity, but a state capable of containing all things.

(Note: References to "Cui Ben" and "Liezi" represent textual variants from different editions, belonging to the field of textual criticism without affecting core philosophical understanding)

 去即止也物來即鑒鑒不以心故雖天下  之廣而無不勞之累 南海之帝爲儵叔北海之帝爲忽中央之帝 爲渾沌儵與忽時相與遇於渾沌之地渾沌 待之甚善儵與忽謀報渾沌之德曰人皆有 七竅以視聽食息此獨無有嘗試鑿之日鑿 一竅七日而渾沌死 郭註
Interpretation

This passage from Zhuangzi Yi elucidates the principle of Wuwei (non-action). It begins with the phrase "去即止也" (when things depart, simply stop), meaning one should observe phenomena as they arise (like a mirror reflects), but refrain from imposing subjective interference. By maintaining this attitude, even when facing the vast complexities of the world, one remains free from exhaustion.

The text then recounts a fable: The ruler of the Southern Sea was named Shu Shu, the Northern Sea's ruler was Hu, while the Central region was governed by Hundun (Chaos). Shu and Hu often met in Hundun's territory, who treated them with exceptional kindness. Wishing to repay this kindness, they conspired: "All men have seven apertures (eyes, ears, nostrils, and mouth) for seeing, hearing, eating, and breathing—only Hundun lacks them." Thus they attempted to bore seven holes into Hundun, carving one aperture each day. On the seventh day, Hundun died.

Guo Xiang (a Jin Dynasty commentator) annotates this with "为者败之" (those who act ruin things), illustrating how deliberate intervention backfires. This parable demonstrates that the natural, primordial state (symbolized by Chaos) holds supreme value, while artificial tampering (the boring of holes) destroys it. As the initial teaching suggests, only by observing phenomena with Wuwei's detached serenity can one avoid being burdened by external things.

爲者敗之

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5h0057); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 1 Vol. 3 →