中文 · EN

《莊子翼》Vol. 5

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Xu Daozang 續道藏 Vol. 5 / 8 20,819 characters

About this page. The original text of 《莊子翼》 Vol. 5 (Xu Daozang 續道藏, 8 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 42 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《莊子翼》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

莊子翼卷之五纓一   至樂第十八 天下有至樂無有哉有可以活身者無有哉 今奚爲奚據奚避奚處奚就奚去奚樂奚惡 夫天下之所尊者富貴壽善也所樂者身安 厚味美服好色音聲也所下者貧賤夭惡也 所苦者身不得安逸口不得厚味形不得美 服目不得好色耳不得音聲若不得者則大 憂以懼其爲形也亦愚哉夫富者苦身疾作 多積財而不得盡用其爲形也亦外矣夫貴 者夜以繼日思慮善否其此形也亦䟽矣人 之生也與憂俱生壽者惛惛久憂不死何之 苦也其爲形也亦遠矣烈士爲天下見善矣 未足以活身吾未知善之誠善邪誠不善邪 若以爲善矣不足活身以爲不善矣足以活 人故曰忠諫不聽蹲存循勿爭故夫子胥爭 之以殘其形不爭名亦不成誠有善無有哉 今俗之所爲與其所樂吾又未知樂之果樂 邪果不樂邪吾觀夫俗之所樂舉羣趣者誙 誙阬然如將不得已而皆曰樂者吾未之樂 也亦未之不樂也果有樂無有哉吾以無爲 誠樂矣又俗之所大苦也故曰至樂無樂至 譽無譽天下是非果未可定也雖然無爲可 以定是非至樂活身唯無爲幾存請嘗試言 之天無爲以之清地無爲以之寧故兩無爲 相合萬物皆化芒乎芴乎而無從出乎芴乎 芒乎而無有象乎萬物職職皆從無爲殖故
Interpretation

Is there truly ultimate happiness in the world? Are there methods that can help people live better lives? What exactly are people pursuing and relying upon nowadays? What should they avoid, and where should they abide? What should they choose and what should they relinquish? What should they love and what should they despise?

What the world commonly esteems are wealth, status, longevity, and fame. People consider happiness to consist of bodily comfort, fine food, elegant clothing, beautiful sights, and pleasant music. They look down upon poverty, low status, short life, and ill repute, regarding suffering as the inability to attain bodily ease, delicious food, fine garments, beautiful sights, or harmonious music. When these things elude them, they become anxious and fearful—such treatment of one's own body is truly foolish.

The wealthy toil desperately, amassing great fortunes they cannot possibly exhaust, only to burden their bodies further. The powerful worry day and night about gains and losses, tormenting their very being. From birth, humans are accompanied by sorrow—those who live long remain muddled in prolonged anxiety—what meaning does such longevity hold? Martyrs may be praised by all under heaven, yet they cannot preserve their own lives. Is this kind of "goodness" truly good or merely its semblance?

When loyal advice is not heeded, one should withdraw and cease contention. Consider Wu Zixu, who was killed for his forceful remonstrations—had he not contended, he would not have achieved fame. Does genuine "goodness" really exist in this world?

The happiness pursued by worldly people—where crowds rush after it noisily as if unable to stop, all proclaiming it to be happiness—does not strike me as either happy or unhappy. Does happiness truly exist? I believe wuwei (non-action, or following nature's course) constitutes real happiness, yet this is precisely what the world most detests. Hence it is said: The greatest happiness is the absence of happiness; the highest honor is the absence of honor.

In this world, right and wrong fundamentally lack absolute determination. Yet wuwei can discern true and false. To attain perfect happiness and nurture life, one must approach the state of wuwei. Let me attempt an explanation: Heaven through wuwei achieves clarity; Earth through wuwei attains tranquility. When Heaven and Earth unite in wuwei, the myriad things spontaneously arise. Vaguely, indistinctly, we know not from whence they come; dimly, obscurely, we perceive no concrete forms. All things flourishing in profusion grow precisely from this wuwei.

曰天地無爲也而無不爲也人也孰能得無 爲哉 郭註忘歡而後樂足樂足而後身存將以爲  有樂邪而至樂無歡將以爲無樂邪而身  以存而無憂爲據避處去就樂惡擇此八  者莫足以活身唯無擇而任其所遇乃全  耳凡服味色聲失之無傷於形而得之有  損於性今反以不得爲憂故愚也内其形  者知足而已親其形者自得於身中而已  夫遺生然後能忘憂忘憂而後生可樂生  可樂而後形是我有富是我物貴是我榮  也烈士見善矣未足以活身善則過當故  不周濟蹲循勿爭唯中庸之德爲然有善  無善當縁督以爲經也舉羣誙誙趣其所  樂乃不避死也吾未之樂亦未之不樂者  無懷而恣物耳夫無爲之樂無憂而已俗  以鏗鎗爲樂美善爲譽天下是非果未定  也我無爲而任天下之是非是非者各自  任則定矣至樂活身惟無爲幾存者百姓  足則吾身近乎存也天地皆自清寧耳非  爲之所得不爲而自合故物皆化若有意  乎爲之則有時而滯也無從出者皆自出  耳未有爲而出之也無有象者無有爲史  象也無爲殖者皆自殖耳人得無爲則無  樂而樂至矣 莊子妻死惠子弔之莊子則方箕踞鼓盆而 歌惠子曰與人居長子老身死不哭亦足矣 又鼓盆而歌不亦甚乎莊子曰不然是其始 死也我獨何能無槩然察其始而本無生非
Interpretation

The natural operation of heaven and earth appears effortless, yet accomplishes all things. How can humans achieve complete non-action (Wuwei)?

Guo Xiang, the Jin dynasty commentator, observed: Only by forgetting worldly pleasures can one attain true fulfillment; only through genuine fulfillment can life be preserved in its wholeness. Those who stubbornly pursue happiness ironically fail to reach its highest form, while those who recognize the absence of such pursuits maintain their lives free from anxiety. People become entangled in eight worldly concerns—approaching and avoiding, dwelling and moving, accepting and rejecting, loving and hating—yet none of these truly nourishes life. Only by relinquishing deliberate choice and accepting whatever comes can one preserve life's completeness.

Excessive pursuit of fine clothing, gourmet food, beautiful sights, and pleasing music may not harm the body when unattained, but their acquisition can damage one's essential nature. Modern people foolishly grieve over not obtaining these things. Those who truly value inner cultivation understand contentment; those who cherish themselves find fulfillment within. Only by transcending attachment to life and death can one forget sorrow, and only then can one enjoy life's pleasures, realizing that the body is one's true wealth and inner abundance the highest glory.

While martyrs' pursuit of virtue is admirable, it falls short of preserving life, as excessive virtue-seeking creates imbalance. One should maintain the moderate virtue of humility and non-contention, accepting both good and evil as they naturally arise. The world rushes headlong after what it deems pleasurable, even risking life itself. The truly wise neither deliberately pursue pleasure nor intentionally avoid it, but maintain their natural disposition in harmony with all things.

The joy of non-action is essentially a state free from sorrow. The worldly take clamor as pleasure and praise as glory, yet the standards of right and wrong in the world remain uncertain. By maintaining non-action and allowing people to judge for themselves, right and wrong naturally resolve. The highest joy and life preservation can only be approached through non-action. When all people are content, my life approaches complete preservation.

The purity and tranquility of heaven and earth are not human creations. Non-action aligns with the Dao (the Way), allowing all things to develop naturally. Deliberate action causes stagnation. All things arise spontaneously, uncreated by any being. Formless things need no artificial shaping. Naturally growing things propagate themselves. Through non-action, even without seeking joy, true happiness comes unbidden.

When Zhuangzi's wife died, his friend Huizi came to offer condolences, finding Zhuangzi sitting with legs outstretched, drumming on a bowl and singing. Huizi protested: "After living with your wife for years, raising children until her old age and death, isn't it excessive to not weep but instead sing while drumming?" Zhuangzi replied: "Not so. When she first died, how could I not grieve? But contemplating life's origin, I realized she had never truly been born."

徒無生也而本無形非徒無形也而本無氣 雜乎芒芴之間變而有氣氣變而有形形變 而有生今又變而之死是相與爲春秋冬夏 四時行也人且偃然寢於巨室而我噭噭叫 然隨而哭之自以爲不通乎命故止也 郭註未明而槩既達而止斯所以誨有情者  將令推至理以遣累也 支離叔與滑骨介叔觀於冥伯之丘崑崙之 虛黄帝之所休俄而柳生其左肘其意蹶蹶 然惡之支離叔曰子惡之乎滑介叔曰亡予 何惡生者假借也假之而生生者塵垢也死 生爲晝夜且吾與子觀化而化及我我又何 惡焉 郭註斯皆先示有情然後尋至理以遣之若  云我本無情故能無憂則夫有情者遂自  絶於遠曠之域而迷困於憂樂之境矣 莊子之楚見空髑獨髏樓髐嘐然有形撽(苦/弔) 反以馬捶因而問之曰夫子貪生失理而爲 此乎將子有亡國之事斧鉞之誅而爲此乎 將子有不善之行愧遺父母妻子之醜而爲 此乎將子有凍餒之患而爲此乎將子之春 秋故及此乎於是語卒援髑髏枕而卧夜半 髑髏見夢曰子之談者似辯士諸子所言皆 生人之累也死則無此矣子欲聞死之說乎 莊子曰然髑髏曰死無君於上無臣於下亦 無四時之事從縱然以天地爲春秋雖南面 王樂不能過也莊子不信曰吾使司命復生
Interpretation

This passage presents Zhuangzi's profound reflections on life and death through several allegorical stories that reveal the Daoist transcendent attitude toward mortality.

The first section describes the natural cycle of existence: initially there is nothingness without form; then Qi (vital energy) emerges from chaos, condenses into physical form, and animates with life; now this life returns to death - a process as natural as the rotation of spring, summer, autumn and winter. Humans peacefully rest within the great house of heaven and earth, yet we weep and wail, demonstrating our failure to comprehend life's true essence.

Next comes the dialogue between Zhi Lishu and Gu Jieshu. When Gu Jieshu develops a sudden tumor on his left elbow and expresses disgust, Zhi Lishu reminds him that life itself is borrowed, with birth and death alternating like day and night. As they observe the transformations of all things together, why should one resent changes occurring to oneself? Guo Xiang's commentary notes we should first acknowledge emotional responses, then resolve them through understanding rather than feigning indifference.

Finally, Zhuangzi converses with a skull. Tapping it with his horsewhip, he asks whether its owner died from worldly attachments, lost kingdoms, wicked deeds, hunger and cold, or natural lifespan. That night, the skull appears in a dream explaining how the dead experience no hierarchical relationships or seasonal toil, enjoying perfect freedom surpassing even a king's happiness. Skeptical, Zhuangzi proposes asking the Director of Fate (Si Ming Shen) to restore its life.

These stories collectively convey: life and death follow natural laws requiring no excessive grief; existence is temporary lodging where gains and losses should be viewed with detachment; death may represent liberation rather than something to fear. Guo Xiang's annotations emphasize resolving emotional distress through wisdom rather than forcibly suppressing feelings.

子形爲子骨肉肌膚反子父母妻子閭里知 識子欲之乎髑髏深矉蹙頞曰吾安能棄南 面王樂而復爲人間之勞乎 郭註舊說云莊子樂死惡生斯說謬矣若然  何謂齊乎所謂齊者生時安生死時安死  生死之情既齊則無爲當生而憂死耳此  莊子之㫖也 顔淵東之齊孔子有憂色子貢下席而問曰 小子敢問回東之齊夫子有憂色何邪孔子 曰善哉女問昔者管子有言丘甚善之曰褚 小者不可以懷大綆短之者不可以汲深夫 若是者以爲命有所成而形有所適也夫不 可損益吾恐回與齊侯言堯舜黄帝之道而 重以燧人神農之言彼將内求于己而不得 不得則惑人惑則死且女獨不聞耶昔者海 鳥止于魯郊魯侯御而觴之於廟奏九韶以 爲樂具太牢以爲膳鳥乃眩視憂悲不敢食 一臠(盧轉/反)不敢飲一盃三日而死此以己養 養鳥也非以鳥養養鳥也夫以鳥養養鳥者 宜栖之深林遊之壇陸浮之江湖食之鰌秋 䱔由隨行列而止委蛇而處彼唯人言之惡 聞奚以夫譊譊爲乎咸池九韶之樂張之洞 庭之野鳥聞之而飛獸聞之而走魚聞之而 下入人卒猝聞之相與還而觀之魚處水而 生人處水而死彼必相與異其好惡故異也 故先聖不一其能不同其事名止於實義設 於適是之謂條達而福持
Interpretation

This passage illustrates Zhuangzi's core philosophy of "following nature's course" through several parables.

First comes the story of the skull: Zhuangzi asks a skull if it wishes to be revived, to regain its body and return to human relationships. The skull frowns and replies, "How could I abandon my kingly happiness in death to resume life's toils?" Guo Xiang's commentary clarifies that Zhuangzi isn't simplistically advocating "death is better than life," but rather that both life and death should be accepted naturally—living peacefully while alive, accepting death serenely when it comes. This embodies true "equality of life and death."

Next is the story of Confucius and Yan Hui: When Yan Hui prepares to visit Qi, Confucius appears worried. Zigong inquires why, and Confucius quotes Guanzi: "A small bag can't hold large objects; a short rope can't reach deep well water." This illustrates all things have their inherent nature that shouldn't be forcibly altered. Confucius fears Yan Hui expounding the Dao of Yao, Shun, and the Yellow Emperor to Qi's ruler might confuse him and endanger Yan Hui.

Finally, the "death of the seabird" parable shows: The ruler of Lu entertained a seabird with the Nine Shao music and grand sacrificial offerings reserved for honored guests, yet the bird died of fright within three days. The proper way to keep birds is letting them roost in forests, play on sandbars, and eat small fish and loaches. Just as refined music like the Xianchi and Nine Shao makes birds and beasts flee while humans gather to listen. Fish thrive in water where humans would drown—all creatures have different natures.

Thus ancient sages never demanded universal capabilities or uniform actions, only that names match realities and all things find their proper place. This is called "when principles flow unimpeded, blessings endure." Through these stories, Zhuangzi teaches us: True wisdom lies in respecting each thing's inherent nature, never imposing human standards on others.

郭註不可損益故當任之而內求已不得將  求於外舍内求外非惑如何不一其能不  同其事者言各隨其情也實而適故條達  性常得故福持 列子行食於道從見百歲髑髏攓蓬而指之 曰唯予與女知而未嘗死未嘗生也若果養 乎予果歡乎種有幾得水則爲□繼得水土 之際則爲鼃蛙蠙之衣生於陵屯則爲陵舄 昔陵舄得鬱棲則爲烏足烏足之根爲蠐螬 其葉爲胡蝶胡蝶胥也化而爲蟲生於竈下 其狀若脫其名爲鴝掇(都括/反)鴝掇千日爲鳥 其名爲乾干餘骨乾餘骨之沫爲斯彌斯彌 爲食醯頤輅生乎食醯黄軦生乎九猷瞀茂 芮汭生乎腐蠸歡羊奚比乎不箰笋久竹生 青寧青寧生程程生馬馬生人人又反入於 機萬物皆出於機 郭註未嘗死未嘗生也各以所遇爲樂果養  乎果歡乎歡養之實未有定在也種有幾  言變化種數不可勝計自得水則爲□至  皆入於機言一氣而萬形有變化而無死  生也   達生第十九 達生之情者不務生之所無以爲達命之情 者不務知之所無奈何養形必先之物物有 餘而形不養者有之矣有生必先無離形形 不離而生亡者有之矣生之來不能却其去 不能止悲夫世之人以爲養形足以存生而 養形果不足以存生則世奚足爲哉雖不足 爲而不可不爲者其爲不免矣夫欲免爲形
Interpretation

Guo Xiang's commentary explains: The Great Dao (referring to natural laws) is inherently perfect and complete, requiring no artificial addition or subtraction. Therefore, one should follow its natural course. If the mind fails to comprehend this truth and instead seeks externally, this constitutes the delusion of neglecting the root while pursuing the branches. Each person's innate capacities differ, and all should develop according to their inherent nature. By maintaining authentic nature, life flows smoothly; by preserving one's essence, blessings naturally endure.

The Liezi records: When Liezi was eating by the roadside, he saw a century-old skull. Brushing aside the weeds, he pointed at it and said: "Only you and I understand that there's truly no distinction between life and death. Have you indeed found rest? Am I truly living joyfully?" All things evolve from minute seeds ("ji"): encountering water, they become algae; at the water-earth boundary, they transform into frogs; on hillocks, they turn into plantains. The plantain meeting manure becomes crowfoot grass, its roots becoming scarab larvae while its leaves become butterflies. The butterfly soon transforms again into insects that dwell below stoves, molting creatures called quduo. After a thousand days, the quduo becomes a bird named ganyugu, whose saliva produces simi insects, which encountering vinegar generate yilu insects... until finally horses give birth to humans, who return again to the transformative mechanism of creation (referring to nature's cycle). All things originate from this creative mechanism and ultimately return to it.

Guo Xiang comments: Without true distinction between life and death, all things find contentment according to their circumstances. What we call joy and rest actually have no fixed standards. The varieties of seed transformations are endless—from becoming algae in water to ultimately returning to nature—demonstrating that all things are different manifestations of the same primal Qi (fundamental substance), with no genuine life or death in essence.

Chapter 19 of Mastering Life states: Those who truly comprehend life's essence don't pursue what life doesn't require; those who understand destiny's truth don't force what intelligence cannot achieve. Nourishing the body requires material goods, yet many with abundant goods fail to maintain health; preserving life first demands maintaining physical form, yet some with intact forms lose their lives. Life's arrival cannot be refused, nor its departure detained. Pitiable are those who believe maintaining physical form guarantees life's preservation—this falls far short. Though life-nourishing methods remain imperfect, humans must still practice them, for we must inevitably make some provisions for the body.

者莫如棄世棄世則無累無累則正平正平 則與彼更生更生則幾矣事奚足棄而生奚 足遺棄事則形不勞遺生則精不虧夫形全 精復與天爲一天地者萬物之父母也合則 成體散則成始形精不虧是謂能移精而又 精反以相天 郭註生之所無以爲者分外物也知之所無  奈何者命表事也知止其分物稱其生生  斯足矣有餘則傷也守形太甚故生亡知  非我所制則無爲有懷於其間故彌養之  而彌失之養之彌厚死地彌至莫若放而  任之性分各自爲者皆在至理中來故不  可免也是以善養生者從而任之更生者  日新之謂也付之日新則性命盡矣棄事  則形不勞遺生則精不虧所以遺棄之形  全精復與天爲一俱不爲也天地萬物之  父母以其所無偏爲故能子萬物也合成  體散成始所在皆成無常處也能移者與  化俱也反以相天者還輔其自然也 子列子問關尹曰至人潜行不窒蹈火不熱 行乎萬物之上而不慄請問何以至於此關 尹曰是純氣之守也非知巧果敢之列居予 語女凡有貌象聲色者皆物也物與物何以 相遠夫奚足以至乎先是色而已則物之造 乎不形而止乎無所化夫得是而窮之者物 焉得而止焉彼將處乎不淫之度而藏乎無 端之紀遊乎萬物之所終始壹其性養其氣
Interpretation

This passage from Zhuangzi Yi elucidates the core philosophy of Daoist self-cultivation. The ultimate liberation lies in relinquishing worldly attachments—when external things are released, burdens dissolve, and the heart returns to stillness. With inner tranquility, one renews life in harmony with the Dao (the Way), and this renewal approaches the true essence of Dao.

Why cling to external things? Why crave longevity? Abandon mundane affairs and the body avoids exhaustion; view life and death with equanimity and the spirit (Shen) remains undiminished. Preserve physical wholeness and spiritual vitality to unite with nature. Heaven and earth are parents to all things—convergence gives form to life; dispersion returns to the source. When form and spirit remain unbroken, one flows with natural transformation; as the spirit ascends continuously, it aids the workings of nature.

Guo Xiang's commentary notes: What life cannot control belongs to the external; what wisdom cannot alter is heavenly mandate (tianming). Knowing one's proper role and letting all things follow their natural course is enough—excessive pursuit brings harm. Forcing bodily preservation may forfeit life; the harder one strives to nurture life, the closer one approaches death. Better to follow spontaneity, allowing innate nature to unfold freely—this is the supreme truth.

Liezi once asked Guan Yin: "Why can those who attain the Dao (de Dao zhe) dive without drowning, tread fire unharmed, and walk heights without fear?" Guan Yin replied: "This comes from abiding in pristine Qi (vital energy), not through cleverness or courage. All that has form and sound belongs to the material world—how much difference can matter make? Those who attain the Dao reach the formless realm, abiding where nothing changes. Mastering this principle, how can external things disturb them? They remain in perfect equilibrium, hidden in the endless rhythm of Dao, wandering the root of all creation and destruction, unifying their nature and nurturing their Qi."

合其德以通乎物之所造夫若是者其天守 全其神無郤隙物奚自入焉夫醉者之墜車 雖疾不死骨節與人同而犯害與人異其神 全也乘亦不知也墜亦不知也死生驚懼不 入乎其胷中是故𨕣悟物而不慴折彼得全 於酒而猶若是而况得全於天乎聖人藏於 天故莫之能傷也復讎者不折鏌干雖有忮 心者不怨飄瓦是以天下平均故無攻戰之 亂無殺戮之刑者由此道也不開人之天而 開天之天開天者德生開人者賊生不厭其 天不忽於人民幾乎以其眞 郭註其心虛故能御群實至適故無不可耳  非物徃可之物與物何以相遠唯無心者  獨遠耳同是形色之物未足以相先常遊  於極非物所制也處乎不淫之度止於所  受之分也藏乎無端之紀冥然與變化日  新也遊乎萬物之所終始者物之極也一  其性飾則二矣養其氣不以心使之合其  德不以物離之萬物皆造於自爾若醉者  之墜車失其所知非自然無心也聖人藏  於天則不闚性分之外故曰藏干將鏌鋣  與讎爲用然報讎者不事折之以其無心  也飄落之瓦雖復中人人莫之怨者由其  無情也是以天下平均凡不平者由有情  也無情之道大矣不慮而知開天也知而  後感開人也然則開天者性之動也開人  者知之用也性動者遇物而當足則忘餘
Interpretation

This passage discusses the Daoist cultivation state of "preserving wholeness of spirit and abiding in Heaven." Zhuangzi uses the example of a drunkard falling from a carriage to illustrate that when one's Shen (spirit) remains complete and undivided, external things cannot harm them. Though the drunkard may sustain injuries from the fall, he doesn't die, because in his intoxicated state he's completely relaxed, free from the awareness of life-and-death fears.

The sage (one who has attained the Dao) operates at a higher level of cultivation. They don't rely on temporary states like drunkenness, but achieve spiritual wholeness through "abiding in Heaven" - merging with the natural Dao. Just as an avenger wouldn't break his enemy's sword, and people don't resent tiles that happen to fall on them (since these are all无心之物 - things without intention), the key to universal peace lies in eliminating artificial selfish thoughts and distractions.

Guo Xiang's commentary further explains: only by maintaining inner emptiness can one contain all things; only by following nature can one adapt effortlessly. The无心之人 (person without artificial intention) transcends material desires and roams freely in the origin of all things. When cultivating Qi, they don't force control but preserve their original nature undisturbed by externals. Like the drunkard's unconsciousness during the fall, the sage remains content with their heavenly-endowed nature without overstepping boundaries. The Dao, though seemingly emotionless, accomplishes great love, while human artifice breeds misfortune.

What truly matters is opening one's natural heavenly disposition (开天 - opening to Heaven), not relying on human cleverness (开人 - opening to human artifice). By acting in accordance with one's true nature, one naturally responds appropriately to situations without clinging afterward. Maintaining this state of primal authenticity brings one closer to the original truth of the Dao.

 斯德生也知用者從感而求勸而不已斯  賊生也任天性而動則人理自全民之所  患僞之所生常在於知用不在於性動也 仲尼適楚出於林中見痀居僂屢者承蜩猶 掇之也仲尼曰子巧乎有道邪曰我有道也 五六月累(上/聲)丸二而不墜則失者錙銖累三 而不墜則失者十一累五而不墜猶掇之也 吾處身也若橛(一作/厥)株拘渠吾執臂也若槁 木之枝雖天地之大萬物之多而唯蜩翼之 知吾不反不側不以萬物易蜩之翼何爲而 不得孔子顧謂弟子曰用志不分乃疑於神 其痀僂丈人之謂乎 郭註累二丸而不墜是用手之停審也故承  蜩所失者不過錙銖之間耳累三而不墜  所失愈少累五而不墜停審之至乃無所  復失處身若橛株拘執臂若槁木之枝不  動之至也何爲而不得者言遺彼故得此  也 顔淵問仲尼曰吾嘗濟乎觴深之淵津人操 舟若神吾問焉曰操舟可學邪曰可善遊者 數朔能若乃夫没人則未嘗見舟而便操之 也吾問焉而不吾告敢問何謂也仲尼曰善 遊者數能忘水也若乃夫没人之未嘗見舟 而便操之也彼視淵若陵視舟之覆猶其車 却也覆却萬方陳乎前而不得入其舍惡徃 而不暇以瓦注者巧以鉤注者憚以黄金注 者殙其巧一也而有所矜則重外也凡外重 者内拙
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the importance of concentration and relinquishing attachments through two parables.

The first story recounts Confucius encountering an elderly hunchback in Chu who caught cicadas with a bamboo pole as effortlessly as picking things off the ground. The old man explained his training method: first balancing two clay balls on the pole tip without dropping them, then progressing to three, then five, until they never fell. When catching cicadas, his body stood immobile as a tree stump, his arms motionless as dead branches, his vision focused solely on the insects' wings—thus achieving perfect accuracy. Confucius marveled at this state of "undivided concentration of mind."

Guo Xiang's commentary adds that through repeated practice, the old man attained supreme focus—forgetting all else ("abandoning that") to perfectly master his skill ("attaining this").

The second story features Yan Hui asking Confucius why skilled swimmers learn rowing quickly, while expert divers can operate boats without prior experience. Confucius explained: swimmers understand water's nature, while divers perceive abysses as level ground and capsized boats as reversed carts. Unburdened by fear, they respond with ease. Like gambling—wagering pottery shards brings ease, metal hooks induce tension, while gold stakes cause mental paralysis. Though the skill remains identical, greater attachment to external objects increasingly clouds the mind.

Both parables demonstrate that complete presence—free from clinging and fear—leads to transcendent mastery. Whether catching cicadas, steering boats, or any skill, the true secret lies in this marriage of focused awareness and inner relaxation.

郭註物雖有性亦須教習而後能習以成性  遂若自然耳視淵若陵故視舟之覆於淵  猶車之却退於坂覆却雖多而不以經懷  以其性便故所遇皆閑暇也以注觀之所  要愈重則其心愈矜夫欲養生全内者其  唯無所矜重乎 田開之見周威公威公曰吾聞祝腎學生吾 子與祝腎遊亦何聞焉田開之曰開之操拔 篲以侍門庭亦何聞於夫子威公曰田子無 讓寡人願聞之開之曰聞之夫子曰善養生 者若牧羊然視其後者而鞭之威公曰何謂 也田開之曰魯有單善豹者巖居而水飲不 與民共利行年七十而猶有嬰兒之色不幸 遇餓虎餓虎殺而食之有張毅者高門縣薄 無不走也行年四十而有内熱之病以死豹 養其内而虎食其外毅養其外而病攻其内 此二子者皆不鞭其後者也仲尼曰無入而 藏無出而陽柴立其中央三者若得其名必 極夫畏塗者十殺一人則父子兄弟相戒也 必盛卒徒而後敢出焉不亦知乎人之所取 畏者衽席之上飲食之間而不知爲之戒者 過也 郭註學生者務中適守一方之事至於過理  者皆不及於會通之適也鞭後者去其不  及也藏既内矣而又入之過於入也陽既  外矣而又出之過於出也若槁木之無心  而中適是立也三者若得其名必極名極  而實當者也夫塗中十殺一人便大畏之
Interpretation

This passage from Zhuangzi uses vivid parables to reveal the core principles of nurturing life. Guo Xiang's commentary notes that while all things possess innate nature, they still require postnatal cultivation to perfect their inherent qualities and ultimately achieve a state of natural spontaneity.

The text presents two contrasting characters: Shan Bao, who secluded himself in the mountains maintaining an infant's complexion at seventy, only to be devoured by a starving tiger; and Zhang Yi, who constantly socialized with the powerful yet died of internal fever at forty. Zhuangzi employs the metaphor of "shepherding sheep"—those skilled in nurturing life are like shepherds who whip the lagging sheep (signifying timely correction of imbalances). Shan Bao focused solely on internal cultivation while neglecting external dangers; Zhang Yi pursued external connections at the expense of depleting his internal Qi (vital energy). Both failed like shepherds who cannot properly guide their flock.

Confucius' essential advice for nurturing life is: neither withdraw excessively inward (like Shan Bao) nor extend excessively outward (like Zhang Yi), but maintain the Middle Way like withered wood. Just as people will travel in groups when knowing a dangerous path has ten percent mortality, yet remain oblivious to greater perils in daily habits—this constitutes the gravest error.

Guo Xiang further explains: cultivating life requires the principle of moderation. "Whipping the laggard" means rectifying deviations; excessive introversion represents the extreme of "withdrawing to conceal," while excessive extroversion embodies the extreme of "emerging to display." Only by being "mindless" like withered wood (free from artificiality) and maintaining the Middle Way can one attain the genuine state of nurturing life where name matches reality. People often remain hypervigilant against ten percent risks while overlooking greater hazards in everyday existence.

 至於色欲之害動之死地而莫不冒之斯   過之甚也 祝宗人玄端以臨牢筴說稅彘曰汝奚惡死 吾將三月㹖汝十日戒三日齋藉白茅加汝 肩尻乎彫□之上則汝爲之乎爲彘謀曰不 如食以糠糟而錯之牢筴之中自爲謀則苟 生有軒冕之尊死得於腞(直轉/反)楯之上聚僂 之中則爲之爲彘謀則去之自爲謀則取之 所異彘者何也 郭註欲贍則身亡理當俱耳不間人獸也 桓公田於澤管仲御見鬼焉公撫管仲之手 曰仲父何見對曰臣無所見公反誒熙詒怡 爲病數日不出齊士有皇子告敖者曰公則 自傷鬼惡能傷公夫忿滀畜之氣散而不反 則爲不足上而不下則使人善怒下而不上 則使人善忘不上不下中身當心則爲病桓 公曰然則有鬼乎曰有沈有履竈有髻詰户 内之煩壤雷霆處之東北方之下者倍裴阿 鮭蛙蠪龍躍之西北方之下者則泆逸陽處 之水有罔象丘有崒山有夔野有方皇彷徨 澤有委蛇公曰請問委蛇之狀何如皇子曰 委蛇其大如轂其長如轅紫衣而朱冠其爲 物也惡聞雷車之聲則捧其首而立見之者 殆乎霸桓公囅(丑忍/反)然而笑曰此寡人之所 見者也於是正衣冠與之坐不終日而不知 病之去也 郭註此章言憂來而累生者不明也患去而  性得者達理也
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here reveals the common contradictions and attachments in human nature through two parables.

The first story tells of a sacrificial officer who, dressed in ceremonial robes, says to a pig: "Why fear death? I'll feed you carefully for three months, purify myself for ten days, prepare offerings for three days, spread white cogon grass, and place your shoulders and haunches on carved ritual vessels. Would you agree to this?" Zhuangzi counters: "From the pig's perspective, it would rather eat husks and live in its pen. Yet humans themselves chase after riding in ornate carriages and wearing official hats while alive, then seek lavish coffins and grand funeral processions after death. Where truly lies the difference between man and pig?" Guo Xiang's commentary notes that indulging desires harms the body—a principle equally true for humans and animals.

The second story recounts how Duke Huan of Qi fell ill after claiming to see a ghost while hunting. The wise man Huangzi Gao explained: "No ghost harmed you—this stems from your own stagnant Qi (vital energy) being imbalanced. When Qi surges upward, one grows irritable; when it sinks downward, forgetful; when trapped in the chest, illness follows." He then cataloged various spirits: the Kitchen God dwells by the stove, the Thunder Spirit behind doors, water demons in rivers, and mountain sprites in wilderness. When describing a marsh-dwelling "Coiling Serpent"—a purple-robed, red-crowned creature afraid of thunder—the Duke laughed and recognized it as what he'd seen. After straightening his robes and conversing all day, his illness vanished. Guo Xiang concludes: "Anxiety springs from mental knots; only by releasing attachments can one attain clarity."

Both parables demonstrate how people become trapped by hollow fame and fleeting gain, when most troubles originate from their own fixations. Like the sacrificial pig and the ghost-fearing ruler, what seems like external disturbance actually reflects inner choices.

紀渻省子爲王養鬥鷄十日而問鷄已乎曰 未也方虛憍而恃氣十日又問曰未也猶應 嚮景十日又問曰未也猶疾視而盛氣十日 又問曰幾矣雞雖有鳴者已無變矣望之似 木雞矣其德全矣異雞無敢應者反走矣 郭註此章言養之以至於全者猶無敵於外  况自全乎 孔子觀於吕梁縣水三十仞流沫四十里黿 鼉魚鱉之所不能遊也見一丈夫遊之以爲 有苦而欲死也使弟子竝流而拯之數百步 而出被髮行歌而遊於塘下孔子從而問焉 曰吾以子爲鬼察子則人也請問蹈水有道 乎曰亡吾無道吾始乎故長乎性成乎命與 齊臍俱入與汨骨偕出從水之道而不爲私 焉此吾所以蹈之也孔子曰何謂始乎故長 乎性成乎命曰吾生於陵而安於陵故也長 於水而安於水性也不知所以然而然命也 郭註磨翁而旋入者齊也回伏而涌岀者汩  也從水之道而不爲私焉任水而不任己  也此章言人有偏能得其所能而任之則  天下無難矣用夫無難以涉乎生生之道  何徃而不通哉 梓慶削木爲鐻據鐻成見者驚猶鬼神魯侯 見而問焉曰子何術以爲焉對曰臣工人何 術之有雖然有一焉臣將爲鐻未嘗敢以耗 氣也必齊齋以靜心齊三日而不敢懷慶賞 爵禄齊五日不敢懷非譽巧拙齊七日輒然 忘吾有四肢形體也當是時也無公朝其巧
Interpretation

Ji Shengzi was training fighting cocks for King Xuan of Zhou. After ten days, the king asked: "Is the cock ready?" Ji replied: "Not yet. It still puts on a fierce appearance and relies on brute Qi (vital energy)." Another ten days passed, and when the king inquired again, Ji said: "Not yet. It still reacts to other cocks' calls and shadows." After ten more days, the king asked a third time, to which Ji responded: "Almost there. Its gaze still carries combative fierceness." Finally, after another ten days, when the king asked for the fourth time, Ji declared: "Now it's ready. Even when another cock crows before it, there's no reaction—it appears like a wooden cock, showing its De (Virtue) is complete. Other cocks flee at the sight of it."

Guo Xiang (a Jin Dynasty Neo-Daoist scholar) commented: When one's cultivation reaches the state of complete De, nothing can oppose it externally—how much more so for perfecting one's inner cultivation?

Confucius was observing the waterfall at Lüliang, where the waters plunged sixty meters, creating foam that stretched for miles. Even giant turtles and crocodiles dared not swim there. Yet he saw a man swimming freely. Thinking the man was drowning, Confucius ordered his disciples to rescue him. But after swimming hundreds of paces, the man emerged calmly, singing with hair flowing as he walked along the bank. Confucius approached and asked: "At first I thought you were a ghost, but now see you're human. What is your secret?" The man replied: "I have no secret. At first it was habit (gu), then it became nature (xing), and finally destiny (ming). I enter with the whirlpools and emerge with the upwelling, following the water's way without imposing my will—this is my Dao of swimming." Confucius pressed: "What do you mean by 'begin with habit, grow into nature, complete with destiny'?" The man explained: "Born by mountains, I adapted to mountains—this is habit. Growing by water, I adapted to water—this is nature. Doing it effortlessly without knowing why—this is destiny."

Guo Xiang's commentary: The downward spiral is the whirlpool (qi), the sudden upwelling is the surge (gu). Following water's nature without self-will means obeying its flow rather than exerting personal force. This shows that when one fully develops their skill in harmony with nature, nothing is difficult. With such an effortless mindset, what path would be blocked?

Carpenter Qing crafted a wooden stand for musical instruments so exquisite that viewers thought it supernatural. When Marquis Lu asked his method, Qing replied: "I'm just a craftsman—what secret could I have? Except this: before carving, I never dissipate my Jing (essence), always purifying my mind through fasting. After three days, I forget rewards. After five days, I forget criticism. After seven days, I forget my own limbs. Then I see only the wood—no court duties remain, all skill concentrates on the material itself."

專而外滑骨消然後入山林觀天性形軀至 矣然後成見鐻然後加手焉不然則已則以 天合天器之所以疑神者其是歟 郭註視公朝若無則跂慕之心絶矣巧專而  外滑消性外之事去也必取材中者然後  加手焉以天合天不離其自然也此則盡  因物之妙故疑是鬼神所作耳 東野稷以御見莊公進退中繩左右旋中規 莊公以爲文弗過也使之鉤百而反顔闔遇 之入見曰稷之馬將敗公宻而不應少焉果 敗而反公曰子何以知之曰其馬力竭矣而 猶求焉故曰敗 郭註馬力竭而猶求焉故敗明至當之不可  過也 工倕旋而蓋規矩指與物化而不以心稽故 其靈臺一而不桎 郭註雖工倕之巧猶任規矩此言因物之易  也 忘足履之適也忘要(平/聲)帶之適也知忘是非 心之適也不内變不外從事會之適也始乎 適而未嘗不適者忘適之適也 郭註百體皆適則都忘其身也是非生於不  適耳所遇而安故無所變從是知識適者  猶未適也 有孫休者踵門而詫子扁慶子曰休居鄉不 見謂不脩臨難不見謂不勇然而田原不遇 歲事君不遇世賔擯於鄉里逐於州部則胡 罪乎天哉休惡烏遇此命也扁子曰子獨不 聞夫至人之自行邪忘其肝膽遺其耳目芒 然彷徨乎塵垢之外逍遥乎無事之業是謂
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the principle of "following nature's course" through several parables. When crafting musical instruments, the carpenter must wait until the wood naturally grows into suitable shapes before working it—this is called "using Heaven to match Heaven" (yi tian he tian), where nature itself harmonizes with nature. Objects made this way become so exquisite they seem crafted by spirits.

Dongye Ji, a master charioteer, demonstrated his skills to Duke Zhuang, making the horses advance, retreat, and turn in perfect formation. Yet Yan He noticed the exhausted horses were being pushed beyond their limits and predicted failure—soon the horses collapsed. This shows even consummate skill cannot excessively defy natural laws.

The ancient artisan Gong Chui could draw perfect circles freehand, surpassing compass precision, because he completely followed the nature of things without forcing. Like shoes so comfortable one forgets one's feet, or a belt so fitting one forgets one's waist—true comfort means forgetting comfort itself.

Finally, when Sun Xiu complained about unrecognized talents, Bian Qingzi remarked: Those who embody the Dao (zhiren) transcend attachments to body and senses, dwelling beyond worldly turmoil in carefree wandering. Worldly gains and losses are to them like dust scattered by wind. Obsessing over social judgment is as futile as raging at shadows. The essence lies in maintaining inner peace and aligning with the natural Dao (Wuwei).

爲而不恃長而不宰今汝飾知以驚愚脩身 以明污昭昭乎若揭日月而行也汝得全而 形軀具而九竅無中道夭於聾盲跛蹇而比 於人數亦幸矣又何暇乎天之怨哉子徃矣 孫子出扁子入坐有間仰天而嘆弟子問曰 先生何爲嘆乎扁子曰向者休來吾告以至 人之德吾恐其驚而遂至於惑也弟子曰不 然孫子之所言是邪先生之所言非邪非固 不能惑是孫子所言非邪先生所言是邪彼 固惑而來矣又奚罪焉扁子曰不然昔者有 鳥止於魯郊魯君說之爲具太牢以饗之奏 九韶以樂之鳥乃始憂悲眩視不敢飲食此 之謂以己養養鳥也若夫以鳥養養鳥者宜 棲之深林浮之江湖食之以委蛇則平陸而 已矣今休款啓寡聞之民也吾告以至人之 德譬之若載鼷以車馬樂鴳以鍾皷也彼又 惡能無驚乎哉 郭註忘肝膽遺耳目闇付自然也凡非眞性  皆塵垢也凡自爲者皆無事之業也率性  自爲非恃而爲之任其自長非宰而長之  以鳥養鳥各有所便也此章言善養生者  各任性分之適而至矣   山木第二十 莊子行於山中見大木枝葉盛茂伐木者止 其旁而不取也問其故曰無所可用莊子曰 此木以不材得終其天年夫子出於山舍於 故人之家故人喜命竪子殺鴈而烹之竪子 請曰其一能鳴其一不能鳴請奚殺主人曰
Interpretation

This passage comes from the "Mountain Tree" chapter of the Zhuangzi, using vivid parables to illustrate the Daoist core principle of "following nature's course."

Zhuangzi first criticizes those who deliberately flaunt their intelligence or moral superiority, comparing them to someone carrying the sun and moon while walking—an ostentatious display. He maintains that merely preserving one's physical form and maintaining intact senses is fortune enough; why waste time complaining about Heaven's Dao (the Way)? Here we see the Daoist attitude of "acting without claiming credit, nurturing without controlling"—engaging with the world while relinquishing attachment to outcomes.

The dialogue between Bianzi and his disciple then demonstrates how applying worldly standards (such as offering sacrificial feasts or courtly music) to forest-dwelling birds only frightens them. Similarly, expounding the virtues of perfected beings to narrow-minded people is like transporting mice in carriages or entertaining small birds with bells and drums—utterly counterproductive. As Guo Xiang's commentary notes, true cultivation means forgetting artificial constructs and letting all things develop according to their intrinsic nature.

The latter section's "mountain tree" parable becomes truly classic: the giant tree survives to old age precisely because it's deemed "useless," while the master slaughters the goose that doesn't cackle. This plunges Zhuangzi into the dilemma of "being useful versus useless," ultimately resolving it through "riding Dao and De (Virtue) to wander freely"—transcending such distinctions, changing with the times, and clinging to neither extreme. This wisdom of "dwelling between usefulness and uselessness" perfectly embodies the Daoist philosophy of "transforming along with the times."

殺不能鳴者明日弟子問於莊子曰昨日山 中之木以不材得終其天年今主人之鴈以 不材死先生將何處莊子笑曰周將處夫材 與不材之間材與不材之間似之而非也故 未免乎累若夫乘道德而浮遊則不然無譽 無訾一龍一蛇與時俱化而無肯專爲一上 一下以和爲量浮遊乎萬物之祖物物而不 物於物則胡可得而累邪此神農黄帝之法 則也若夫萬物之情人倫之傳則不然合則 離成則毁廉則挫尊則議有爲則虧賢則謀 不肖則欺胡可得而必乎哉悲夫弟子志之 其唯道德之鄉乎 郭註設將處此耳以未免乎累竟不處若夫  乘道德而浮遊者莊子亦處焉胡可得而  必乎哉言不可必故待之不可以一方也  唯與時俱化者能設變而常之耳 市南宜僚見魯侯魯侯有憂色市南子曰君 有憂色何也魯侯曰吾學先王之道脩先君 之業吾敬鬼尊賢親而行之無須臾離居然 不免於患吾是以憂市南子曰君之除患之 術淺矣夫豐狐文豹棲於山林伏於巖穴靜 也夜行晝居戒也雖飢渴隱約猶且胥䟽於 江河之上而求食焉定也然且不免於網羅 機辟之患是何罪之有哉其皮爲之灾也今 魯國獨非君之皮邪吾願君刳形去皮洒心 去欲而遊於無人之野南越有邑焉名爲建 德之國其民愚而朴少私而寡欲知作而不
Interpretation

Zhuangzi once saw a tree in the mountains that remained uncut because its wood was useless. The next day, he witnessed a host slaughtering a goose that couldn't honk to serve his guests. His disciples asked: "The useless tree survives while the silent goose gets killed—how should one position oneself in this world?"

Zhuangzi smiled and replied: "I would choose to dwell between usefulness and uselessness. Yet this deliberately maintained middle ground, though seemingly clever, still has limitations. The true transcendent approach is to follow the natural Dao (the Way), appearing and disappearing like dragons or snakes with the changing seasons, never clinging to any fixed form. When one connects with the primordial source of all things, one masters external matters without being burdened by them—this is the principle followed by the legendary emperors Shennong and Huangdi."

"As for worldly human affairs: gatherings inevitably lead to separations, success breeds downfall, integrity invites slander, and prominence attracts criticism. The capable become targets of scheming while the incompetent suffer bullying—where can one find perfect safety? Remember, my disciples, only by returning to the natural Dao can one find true refuge."

Guo Xiang's commentary notes that although Zhuangzi proposes "dwelling between usefulness and uselessness," he ultimately doesn't remain at this level. Truly realized individuals flow with nature's transformations without fixation.

In the subsequent story where Shinan Yiliao meets the Marquis of Lu, the Marquis complains of misfortunes despite his reverent cultivation. Using the metaphor of foxes and leopards hunted for their splendid fur, Shinan points out that Lu itself is the Marquis's "fur"—the very cause of his troubles. He advises abandoning physical attachments and desires to wander freely in the "Land of Established Virtue (De)." There, people live with childlike simplicity: farming without hoarding, giving without expectation, ignorant of artificial rituals yet naturally aligned with heavenly principles.

知藏與而不求其報不知義之所適不知禮 之所將猖狂妄行乃蹈乎大方其生可樂其 死可葬吾願君去國捐俗與道相輔而行君 曰彼其道遠而險又有江山我無舟車奈何 市南子曰君無形倨無留居以爲君車君曰 彼其道幽遠而無人吾誰與爲鄰吾無糧我 無食安得而至焉市南子曰少君之費寡君 之欲雖無糧而乃足君其涉於江而浮於海 望之而不見其崖愈徃而不知其所窮送君 者皆自崖而反君自此遠矣故有人者累見 有于人者憂爲人役故堯非有人非見有于 人也吾願厺君之累除君之憂而獨與道遊 于大莫之國道德之鄉方舟而濟于河有虛 船來觸舟雖有偏心之人不怒有一人在其 上則呼張歙之一呼而不聞再呼而不聞於 是三呼邪則必以惡聲隨之向也不怒而今 也怒向也虛而今也實人能虛己以遊世其 孰能害之北宫奢爲衛靈公賦歛以爲鍾爲 壇乎郭門之外三月而成上下之縣王子慶 忌見而問焉曰子何術之設設架縣鍾上下 各六所謂編鍾也歛民鑄宜乎速成何必三 月奢曰一之間無敢設也奢聞之既雕既琢 復歸於朴侗乎其無識儻乎其怠疑萃乎芒 乎其送徃而迎來來者勿禁徃者勿止從其 彊梁隨其曲傳因其自窮故朝夕賦歛而毫 毛不挫而况有大塗者乎孔子圍于陳蔡之
Interpretation

This passage from the Zhuangzi's "Mountain Tree" chapter presents a dialogue between Shinanzi and the Marquis of Lu, illustrating the Daoist philosophy of "empty-self wandering through the world."

Shinanzi advises the Marquis: Those who truly comprehend the Dao (the Way) neither calculate personal gain nor bind themselves to worldly rituals. Though appearing unconventional, they move in perfect harmony with celestial patterns. He urges the Marquis to relinquish his rulership and worldly entanglements to walk the path of Dao. The Marquis expresses anxiety about the journey's dangers—distant roads, lack of transportation, and insufficient provisions.

Shinanzi responds: Diminish desires and expenditures, and provisions become unnecessary. He compares spiritual cultivation to crossing oceans—while well-wishers turn back at the shore, the cultivator journeys beyond. Subjects become burdens, attendants bring worries; even Emperor Yao exemplified neither ruling others nor being ruled.

The "empty boat" metaphor reveals the art of living: an unmanned drifting vessel provokes no anger, while a manned one invites curses. By becoming as empty and unattached as such a boat, one wanders the world unharmed.

The concluding tale of Beigong She crafting bells demonstrates natural accomplishment: forced haste destroys spontaneity, yet by following the people's rhythm without coercion, he completes the bells in three months without burdening them. Like the Dao's silent operation that nurtures all things without trace.

This passage crystallizes Zhuangzi's concepts of wuwei (non-action) and empty stillness—eliminating utilitarian motives, reducing desires, and harmonizing with nature through a tranquil mind to achieve unencumbered freedom.

間七日不火食太公任徃弔之曰子幾死乎 曰然子惡死乎曰然任曰予嘗言不死之道 東海有鳥焉其名曰意怠其爲鳥也翂翂翐 翐而似無能引援而飛迫脅而棲逐隊傍人 若不得已進不敢爲前退不敢爲後從容處 食不敢先嘗必取其緒是故其行列不斥群 于人而外人卒不得害是以免于患直木先 伐甘井先竭子其意者飾知以驚愚修身以 明汗昭昭乎如揭日月而行故不免也昔吾 聞之大成之人曰自伐者無功功成者隳名 成者虧孰能去功與名而還與衆人道流而 不明居得行而不名不居者道也流布而不 自明其所居顯行而不自明其所處處純純 常常乃比于狂削迹捐勢不爲功名 郭註論語曰伯夷叔齊餓於首陽之下不言  其死也此云死者亦欲明其守餓以終未  必餓死也 郭氏緫註此篇大意以起高讓遠退之風故  被其風者雖貪冒之人乘天衢入紫庭猶  時慨然中路而嘆况其凡乎故夷許之徒  足以當稷契對伊吕矣夫居山谷而弘天  下者雖不俱爲聖佐不猶高於蒙埃塵者  乎其事雖難爲然其風少弊故可遺也曰  夷許之弊安在曰許由之弊使人飾讓以  求進遂至乎之噲也伯夷之風使暴虐之  君得賜其毒而莫之敢亢也伊吕之弊使  天下貪冒之雄敢行篡逆唯聖人無迹故
Interpretation

This passage illustrates Zhuangzi's wisdom on navigating human affairs through allegorical stories.

In the Eastern Sea, there exists a bird called the "Yi Dai" (meaning "sluggish intent"). When flying, it appears clumsy, always moving with the flock—never rushing ahead nor lagging behind, and never daring to be the first to eat. Precisely because of this, it avoids calamity. Zhuangzi uses this metaphor to explain: the tallest trees are the first to be felled, the sweetest wells are the first to run dry. Those who deliberately display intelligence or flaunt their virtue are like people carrying the sun and moon—impossible to miss, and thus more likely to invite misfortune.

Zhuangzi quotes the words of the "Great Accomplished One" (a Daoist sage): those who boast of themselves never truly succeed, and worldly achievements often bring loss instead. A genuine Daoist does not chase fame or merit but merges seamlessly with the masses. Though their virtue spreads, they never promote themselves; though their actions shine, they never deliberately display them. This seemingly dull state is, in fact, the highest wisdom.

Guo Xiang, in his commentary, cites the example of Bo Yi and Shu Qi starving to death at the foot of Shouyang Mountain to illustrate the value of steadfast integrity. The core message of the passage advocates for humility and yielding as the proper way to conduct oneself in the world. Though such an ideal may be difficult to fully embody, it serves as a corrective to the restless tendencies of society. However, Guo Xiang also warns that excessive admiration for recluses like Xu You and Bo Yi could lead to an artificial culture of false modesty or embolden tyrants to act without restraint. Only a sage can guide others without leaving traces.

(Note: The figures mentioned—Xu You, Bo Yi, and Shu Qi—were famous ancient hermits; "Yi Lü" refers to Yi Yin and Lü Shang, wise ministers who assisted rulers; Ji and Xie were two virtuous ministers under Emperor Shun.)

 無弊也大城數百里立數十萬户之邑尊 聿乘若以伊吕爲聖人之迹則伯夷叔齊亦  聖人之迹也若以伯夷叔齊非聖人之迹  耶則伊吕之事亦非聖矣夫聖人因物之  自行故無迹然則所謂聖者我本無迹故  物得其迹迹得而强名聖則聖者乃無迹  之名也 是故無責於人人亦無責焉至人不聞子何 喜哉孔子曰善哉辭其交遊去其弟子逃於 大澤衣裘褐食杼序栗入獸不亂群入鳥不 亂行鳥獸不惡而况人乎 郭註聖人無好惡既弘大舒暢又心無常係  不敢爲前爲後者常從容處中也食必取  其緒期於隨物而已行列不斥與群俱也  患害生於役知以奔競木伐井竭才之害  也夫察焉小異則與衆爲迕矣混然大同  則無獨異於世矣故夫昭昭乃冥冥之迹  也將寄言以遺迹故因陳蔡以托意恃功  名以爲已成者未之嘗全功自衆成故還  之道昩然而自行彼皆居然自得此行耳  非由名而後處之純純常常乃比於狂無  心而動故也功自彼成故勢不在我而名  迹皆去恣情任彼故彼各自當其責也寂  泊無懷乃至人也故曰至人不聞辭交遊  去弟子取其弃人間之好也不亂群不亂  行若草木之無心故爲鳥獸之不畏蓋寄  言以極推至誠之信任乎物而無受害之  地也 孔子問子桑虖曰吾再逐於魯伐樹於宋削
Interpretation

This passage discusses the realm of sages and their way of being in the world.

Through contrasting examples of Yi Yin and Lü Shang (renowned virtuous ministers of Shang and Zhou dynasties) with Bo Yi and Shu Qi (reclusive scholars of late Shang), Zhuangzi illustrates that true sages never deliberately leave traces of their deeds. The sage follows the natural development of all things, thus leaving no artificial marks. The so-called title of "sage" is merely a label people reluctantly apply after observing the results of natural processes.

Therefore, the highest realm of "perfected persons" (zhiren) makes no excessive demands on others, nor do others make demands on them. Confucius praised this state, saying: The best approach is to minimize social interactions, withdraw from disciples, retreat to mountain forests, wear coarse cloth, and eat wild fruits. Dwelling among wild animals without disturbing their herds, coexisting with birds without disrupting their formations—when even birds and beasts don't dislike him, how much more so with humans?

Guo Xiang's commentary further explains: Sages have no personal preferences, their minds are expansive and unattached to anything. They neither rush ahead nor lag behind, always maintaining composed moderation. In eating, they seek only to satisfy hunger, accepting whatever comes their way. They neither deliberately oppose the crowd with novelty nor intentionally conform to worldly customs. Those who flaunt their intelligence and chase fame are like those who fell trees and dry up wells—ultimately inviting misfortune.

True perfected persons embody tranquility and detachment, abandoning worldly desires. Like plants and trees in their natural wuwei (non-action), even birds and beasts don't fear them. This metaphor illustrates that complete alignment with nature leads to a state beyond harm.

The passage concludes with Confucius consulting Zisang Hu, recounting his repeated encounters with adversity (expulsion from Lu, having trees cut down in Song), suggesting that spiritual cultivators must transcend such worldly setbacks.

迹於衛窮於商周圍於陳蔡之間吾犯此數 患親交益䟽徒友益散何與子桑虖曰子獨 不聞假人之亡與林回棄千金之璧負赤子 而趨或曰爲其布曰赤子之布寡矣爲其累 與赤子之累多矣棄千金之璧負赤子而趨 何也林回曰彼以利合此以天屬也夫以利 合者迫窮禍患害相棄也以天屬者迫窮禍 患害相收也夫相收之與棄棄亦遠矣且君 子之交淡若水小人之交甘若醴君子淡以 親小人甘以絶彼無故以合者則無故以離 孔子曰敬聞命矣徐行翔佯而歸絶學捐書 弟子無挹於前其愛益加進異日桑虖又曰 舜之將死眞冷禹曰汝戒之哉形莫者縁情 莫若率縁則不離率則不勞不離不勞則不 求文以待形不求文以待形固不待物 郭註君子之交去利故淡道合故親小人之  交飾利故甘利不可常故有時而絶也無  故而自合者天屬也合不由故則故不足  以離之有故而合必有故而離矣其愛益  加進者去餙任素故也因形率情故不矯  之以利形不假故常全情不矯故常逸不  求文以待形任朴而直前也固不待物朴  素而足也 莊子衣大布而補之正緳絜係履而過魏王 魏王曰何先生之憊邪莊子曰貧也非憊也 士有道德不能行憊也衣弊履穿貧也非憊 也此所謂非遭時也王獨不見夫騰猿乎其
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the essence of human relationships and the art of living through several parables.

When Confucius traveled between the states of Wei, Song, Chen, and Cai, he repeatedly encountered hardships, and his friends and relatives gradually distanced themselves from him. He asked Zisang Hu (a Daoist recluse) why this was happening. Zisang Hu recounted a story: A man named Lin Hui, while fleeing during a crisis, abandoned a priceless jade disk but carried an infant on his back. When asked why, he replied that the jade was bound by profit, whereas the child was connected by natural kinship. Relationships based on benefit dissolve when disaster strikes, while those rooted in innate bonds endure and support each other in hardship. The interactions between noble individuals are as plain as water, while those of petty people are as cloying as sweet wine. The noble grow closer through simplicity, while the petty sever ties when interests diverge.

Upon hearing this, Confucius realized he needed to relinquish his attachment to scholarly pursuits and return to his natural disposition. Later, Zisang Hu further illustrated this principle by recounting Emperor Shun’s final advice to Yu the Great: "To preserve the body, follow nature’s course; to express emotions, be genuine and unguarded. This way, you will neither stray from your true nature nor exhaust your spirit. There is no need for deliberate pretense—maintaining your innate simplicity is enough."

Zhuangzi once visited the King of Wei wearing patched, coarse clothing. The king remarked that he appeared destitute. Zhuangzi explained: Poverty is not the same as destitution—true destitution lies in possessing virtue yet failing to embody it. Just as a monkey moves with effortless agility among trees but trembles when placed among thorns, one’s behavior shifts with circumstance.

得柟梓豫章也攬蔓其枝而王長其間雖羿 逢蒙不能睥睨也及其得柘棘枳枸之間也 危行側視振動悼慄此筋骨非有加急而不 尋也處勢不便未足以逞其能也今處昏上 亂相之間而欲無戀奚可得也此比干之見 剖心徵也夫孔子窮于陳蔡之間七日不火 食左據槁木右擊槁枝而歌焱氏之風有其 具而無其數有其聲而無宫角木聲與人聲 犂然有當於人之心顔回端拱還目而窺之 仲尼恐其廣己而造大也愛己而造衣也曰 回無受天損易無受人此難無始而非卒也 人與天一也夫今之歌者其誰乎回曰敢問 無受天損易仲尼曰饑渴寒暑窮桎不行天 地之行也運物之泄也言與之偕逝之謂也 爲人臣者不敢去之執臣之道猶若是而况 乎所以待天乎何謂無受人益難仲尼曰始 用四達爵禄竝至而不窮物之所利乃非己 也吾命有在外者也君子不爲盜賢人不爲 竊吾若取之何哉故曰鳥莫知于鷾鴯目之 所不宜處不給視雖落其實棄之而走其畏 人也而襲命人間社稷存焉爾何謂無始而 非卒仲尼曰化其萬物而不知其禪之者焉 知其所終焉知其所始正而待之而已耳何 謂人與天一邪仲尼曰有人天也有天亦天 也天之所以爲天又造化爲之主宰人之不 能有天性也損益間者不透性分上虧矣
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here employs vivid analogies to illustrate how environment profoundly influences both people and objects.

First, the example of trees: Towering specimens like nanmu, catalpa, and camphorwood (precious timbers in antiquity) with their luxuriant branches make rulers appear majestic beneath their canopy—so imposing that even legendary archers like Hou Yi and Peng Meng wouldn’t dare slight them. Yet when the same trees grow among thorny thickets, one can only tread cautiously sideways. This isn’t due to weakened sinews or bones, but to the disadvantageous surroundings.

Next, historical figures demonstrate this principle: Bi Gan, trapped in a court of tyrants and sycophants, sought self-preservation only to have his heart carved out; Confucius, stranded without food for seven days in the lands of Chen and Cai, resorted to beating time on a withered tree while singing. Though his songs hailed from Emperor Yan’s ancient era, the dissonance between the hollow knocks and his voice moved listeners unexpectedly. As his disciple Yan Hui stood observing reverently, Confucius—fearing excessive admiration—offered four crucial insights:

1. "Do not resent Heaven’s trials as easy": Hunger, thirst, cold, heat, or worldly obstructions follow natural law like the seasons’ turn or life’s ebbs and flows. Just as ministers dare not neglect their duties, how much less should one defy Tianming (Heaven’s decree)?

2. "Do not covet human gains as simple": Early official success with steady titles and stipulations seems fortunate, yet such external rewards aren’t truly ours. Like swallows (yiyi) that avoid perilous spots—abandoning food there—we must discern what rightfully belongs to us.

3. "No absolute beginnings or endings exist": All things transform in flux; their origins and conclusions elude certainty. Maintain an upright mind and simply await what comes.

4. "Human and Heaven unite as one": Humans belong to nature, and nature to the Dao (the Way). Nature is nature precisely because the Creator governs it. To violate innate tendencies by obsessing over gain and loss is to injure one’s essential nature.

Through arboreal imagery, historical anecdotes, and master-disciple dialogue, this passage progressively reveals the vital importance of aligning with nature and abiding by one’s inherent role.

聖人安然體逝而終矣莊周遊乎雕陵之樊 覩一異鵲自南方來者翼廣七尺目大運寸 感周之顙而集於栗林飛過其前莊周曰此 何鳥哉翼殷不逝大也目大不覩蹇裳躩步 執彈而留之覩一蟬方得美蔭而忘其身螳 螂執翳而搏之見得而忘其形異鵲從而利 之見利而忘其眞莊周怵然曰噫物固相累 二類相召也捐彈而反走虞人逐而誶之莊 周反人三月不庭庭平也蘭且從而問之夫 子何爲頃謂甚不庭乎莊周曰吾守形忘身 觀於濁水而迷於清淵且吾聞諸夫子曰入 其俗從其俗今吾遊於雕陵而忘吾身異鵲 感吾顙遊於栗林而忘眞栗林虞人以吾爲 戮吾所以不庭也 郭注行所爲因而任之行主自爲而天下化  化使物爲之則不化矣四方之民莫不俱  至者言其指揮顧𦕎而民各至其性任其  自爲故也 筆乘德人則無思無慮率自然耳無是非于  胸中而任之遊乎天下其利共給而無目  私之懷也德者神人之迹故曰容乘光者  乃棄光故與形滅亡無我而任物虛空無  所懷者非閵塞也情盡命至天地樂矣事  不妨樂斯無事矣情復而混冥無迹也哉  耳  於物者物亦有欲之所謂物固相累二類  相召也誶問之也身在人間世有夷險若  推夷易之形於此世而不度此世之所宜  斯守形而忘身者也觀於濁水迷於清淵
Interpretation

While wandering in his Diaoling garden, Zhuangzi saw a strange magpie flying from the south. Its wings spanned seven feet, with eyes an inch in diameter. Brushing past Zhuangzi's forehead, it alighted in a chestnut grove. Puzzled, Zhuangzi wondered: What bird is this? With such vast wings yet flying so low, such enormous eyes yet seeing so poorly? Hitching up his robe, he hurried after it with a slingshot ready.

Then he observed a revealing scene: A cicada basking in cool shade had forgotten all caution; a mantis hiding among leaves focused solely on seizing the cicada, oblivious to its own peril; while that peculiar magpie prepared to snatch the mantis, equally blinded by immediate gain. Suddenly enlightened, Zhuangzi sighed: "Alas! This is how creatures entangle one another—mutual attraction breeding mutual harm!" Discarding his slingshot, he turned to leave, only to be chased and scolded by the orchard keeper.

For three months afterward, Zhuangzi remained secluded at home. When disciple Lin Ju asked about his withdrawal, Zhuangzi explained: "I committed the error of 'guarding form while forgetting essence'—like staring at turbid water yet drowning in clear depths. My teacher taught us to 'follow local customs,' yet at Diaoling I neglected my safety; when the magpie grazed my brow, I forgot my true nature. The orchard keeper's reproach became my mirror—hence this period of contemplation."

Guo Xiang's commentary illuminates: The sage follows Dao (the Way) effortlessly, and all things naturally align. Like sunlight nurturing growth without coercion, the truly virtuous harbor no rigid judgments, moving with natural spontaneity (Wuwei), benefiting all without possession. Those attaining this state merge like light and shadow—seemingly absent yet omnipresent.

This parable unveils the profound truth of "mutual entanglements": obsession with external matters inevitably binds the obsessor. The cicada, mantis, magpie, and Zhuangzi himself all forgot fundamentals by fixating on immediacy. In worldly engagement, perceiving surface calm without discerning deeper currents constitutes "clinging to form while losing essence"—like mistaking turbid shallows for clear depths, a warning against losing authenticity amid illusions.

 者言見彼而不明即因彼以自見幾忘反  鑒之道也入俗從俗不違其禁令也以吾  爲戮以見問爲戮也夫莊子推平於天下  故每寄言以出意乃毁仲尼賤老聃上掊  擊乎三皇下痛病其一身也 陽子之宋宿於逆旅逆旅人有妾二人其一 人美其一人惡惡者貴而美者賤陽子問其 故逆旅小子對曰其美者自美吾不知其美 也其惡者自惡吾不知其惡也陽子曰弟子 記之行賢而去自賢之行安徃而不愛哉 郭註言自賢之道無時而可也   田子方第二十一 田子方侍坐於魏文侯數朔稱谿工文侯曰 谿工子之師邪子方曰非也無擇之里人也 稱道數當故無擇稱之文侯曰然則子無師 邪子方曰有曰子之師誰邪子方曰東郭順 子文侯曰然則夫子何故未嘗稱之子方曰 其爲人也眞人貌而天虛縁而葆眞清而容 物物無道正容以悟之使人之意也消無擇 何足以稱之子方出文侯倘然終日不言召 前立臣而語之曰遠矣全德之君子始吾以  如易自求口寳之寳社稷春秋祭社稷時  也君子視無功之爵禄如盜窮然豈有心  於取之而命之所制亦有不得自由者故  曰非已也命有在外者也如燕於巳之不  宜處目不及視雖棄其口寳亦所不顧其  畏人甚矣氏不能不襲處於人間則以社  稷之時有若或驅之而不得自主者耳燕
Interpretation

Zhuangzi illustrates through several stories that true virtue (De) does not lie in external displays. A man named Yangzi stayed at an inn in the state of Song where the innkeeper had two concubines—one beautiful and one plain. Surprisingly, the plain one received more respect. The innkeeper explained: "The beautiful one constantly flaunts her looks, so I don't find her beautiful. The plain one knows her plainness, so I don't find her plain." Yangzi realized: "Those who embody virtue without self-display will be cherished wherever they go." Guo Xiang's commentary notes that any self-conscious attitude of virtue is fundamentally misguided.

When Tian Zifang conversed with Marquis Wen of Wei, he repeatedly praised a fellow villager named Xigong. The Marquis asked if this was his teacher, but Tian denied it, saying Xigong was merely a townsman. Pressed to name his actual teacher, Tian revealed it was Dongguo Shunzi. The Marquis wondered why he'd never mentioned this master before. Tian explained: "My teacher preserves his innate nature (Baozhen), remaining pure and embracing all things. When encountering un-Daoist behavior, he need only correct his posture to make others feel ashamed. Such a realm is beyond my capacity to evaluate." After hearing this, the Marquis spent the whole day in contemplation, sighing that this was truly a gentleman of perfect virtue.

Later passages discuss how true gentlemen consider unearned rewards as theft, though sometimes destiny compels acceptance. Like swallows who know eaves are unsafe for nests—taking one look before fleeing, even abandoning carried mud—so fearful are they of humans. Though people must dwell in the world, facing fame and fortune should feel like being driven onward, maintaining vigilance. Here swallows symbolize adepts who maintain transcendent awareness while living in the mundane world.

 以春祉來秋社去故支然數語本非離觧  而舊註多謬聊爲䟽之 莊周遊乎雕陵之樊覩一異鵲自南方來者 翼廣七尺目大運寸感周之顙而集於栗林 莊周曰此何鳥哉翼殷不逝目大不覩蹇裳 躩步執彈而留之覩一蟬方得美蔭而忘其 身螳螂執翳而搏之見得而忘其形異鵲從 而利之見利而忘其眞莊周怵然曰噫物固 相累二類相召也捐彈而反走虞人逐而誶 之莊周反人三月不庭蘭且從而問之夫子 何爲頃問謂甚不庭乎莊周曰吾守形忘身 觀於濁水而迷於清淵且吾聞諸夫子曰入 其俗從其俗今吾遊於雕陵而忘吾身異鵲 感吾顙遊於栗林而忘眞栗林虞人以吾爲 戮吾所以不庭也 郭注執木葉以自翳於蟬而忘其形之見乎  异鵲也目能覩翼能逝此鳥之眞性也今  見利故忘之夫相爲利者恒相爲累有欲 聖知之言仁義之行爲至矣吾聞子方之師 吾形解而不欲動口鉗而不欲言吾所學者 真土梗耳夫魏眞爲我累耳 郭註言東郭順子貌與人同而獨任自然虛  而順物故眞不失夫清者患於大絜今清  而容物則與天同也清虛正己而物邪自  消形不欲動口不欲言者目覺其近也土  梗者非眞物也魏眞爲我累耳知至貴者  以人爵爲累也 温伯雪子適齊舍於魯魯人有請見之者温
Interpretation

While wandering in his garden at Diaoling, Zhuangzi saw a strange magpie flying from the south. Its wings spanned seven feet, its eyes measured an inch across, and it brushed past Zhuangzi's forehead before alighting in a chestnut grove.

Zhuangzi wondered: "What bird is this? With such large wings yet unable to fly far, such huge eyes yet failing to see clearly." He hitched up his robe and hurried after it, crossbow in hand. Then he noticed a cicada blissfully enjoying the cool shade, utterly oblivious to danger; a mantis lurking behind leaves, fixated on its prey while forgetting its own peril; and that peculiar magpie seizing the chance to snatch the mantis, so consumed by gain that it lost its true nature.

Suddenly enlightened, Zhuangzi sighed: "Alas! This is how all beings entangle one another—different creatures mutually attracting through their desires." He cast aside his crossbow and turned to leave, only to be chased and scolded by the garden keeper. Returning home, he remained indoors for three months. His student Lanqie asked: "Master, why have you scarcely ventured out lately?"

Zhuangzi replied: "I became so absorbed in observing external things that I forgot my own safety. It's like peering at turbid water while failing to see the clear depths below. My teacher once said: 'When entering a place, follow its customs.' Yet at Diaoling, I forgot myself. That strange bird grazed my forehead, and in the chestnut grove, it too forgot its nature. The keeper's reproach reminds me why I stay inside."

Commentator Guo Xiang explains: The mantis concealed itself to catch the cicada but forgot the magpie eyeing it. The bird, capable of keen sight and distant flight by nature, lost itself to greed. Whenever beings exploit one another for profit, mutual entanglements arise.

Zhuangzi continued: "Those who preach sagehood, wisdom, and artificial virtues sound lofty. But as Zifang's teacher said: 'My body rests without desire to move; my mouth closes without wish to speak.' What I've learned amounts to mere clay dolls and wooden figurines—false knowledge. Wei State's so-called 'perfected men' (zhenren) have instead become my burdens."

Guo Xiang elaborates: Dongguo Shunzi appeared ordinary yet harmonized with his innate nature, thus preserving authenticity. The overly fastidious often err in excessive purity; embracing all things aligns one with the Dao (the Way). When body and mind abide in serene wuwei (non-action), external delusions dissolve naturally. Refraining from movement and speech stems from recognizing their limitations. Clay-doll learning lacks substance. Wei's 'perfected men' become hindrances to those pursuing the ultimate path.

(Note: The final reference to "Wenbo Xuezi" belongs to another passage and isn't expanded here.)

伯雪子曰不可吾聞中國之君子明乎禮義 而陋於知人心吾不欲見也至於齊反舍於 魯是人也又請見温伯雪子曰徃也蘄見我 今也又蘄見我是必有以振我也出而見客 入而歎明日見客又入而歎其僕曰每見之 客也必入而歎何邪曰吾固告子矣中國之 民明乎禮義而陋乎知人心昔之見我者進 是一成規一成矩從容一若龍一若虎其諫 我也似子其道我也似父是以歎也仲尼見 之而不言子路曰吾子欲見温伯雪子久矣 見之而不言何邪仲尼曰若夫人者目擊而 道存矣亦不可以容聲矣 郭註進退成規矩從容若龍虎盤辟其步委  蛇其迹也諫我似子道我似父禮義之弊  有斯飾也見之而不言已知其心矣不可  以容聲者且其徃意已達無所容其德音  也 顔淵問於仲尼曰夫子步亦步夫子趨亦趨 夫子馳亦馳夫子奔逸絶塵而回瞠撑若乎 後矣夫子曰回何謂邪曰夫子步亦步也夫 子言亦言也夫子趨亦趨也夫子辯亦辯也 夫子馳亦馳也夫子言道回亦言道也及奔 逸絶塵而回瞠若乎後者夫子不言而信不 比而周無器而民蹈乎前而不知所以然而 已矣仲尼曰惡可不察與夫哀莫大於心死 而人死亦次之日出東方而入於西極萬物 莫不比方有目有趾者待是而後成功是出
Interpretation

Bo Xuezi, a Daoist hermit, said, “I do not wish to meet the gentlemen of the Central States. Though they understand the rules of propriety, they do not understand the true state of the human heart.” Later, he went to the state of Qi and, on his return, stayed for a time in Lu. After meeting his hosts, Bo Xuezi returned to his room and sighed again and again. The next day, after meeting more guests, he sighed once more. His servant asked why, and he explained: “The people of the Central States cling to the rules of ritual. When they meet, their movements are stiff, as though measured with compass and square. Their conduct deliberately imitates the imposing bearing of dragons and tigers. When they admonish me, they act like sons speaking to their fathers; when they instruct me, they act like fathers speaking to their sons. Such affected behavior is cause for sighing.”

When Confucius met Bo Xuezi, he remained silent. Zilu asked in puzzlement, “Have you not always wanted to meet him? Why, now that you have met, do you say nothing?” Confucius replied, “With someone like him, the Dao is already conveyed through a glance. There is no need for words.” (“The Dao is present in a meeting of the eyes” means that one can recognize another’s cultivation through eye contact alone.)

Yan Hui, a disciple of Confucius, asked him, “I have tried to follow you step by step, imitating the way you walk, speak, debate, and teach. But when you reach a state of ‘racing beyond the dust,’ a level of transcendence, I cannot keep up. You persuade people without speaking; without deliberately seeking closeness, you make them feel fully cared for. You hold no position of authority, yet the people follow you of their own accord. Why is this?” Confucius answered gravely, “You must understand this: the greatest sorrow is for the mind to become rigid—‘the death of the heart’ means losing one’s capacity for insight. The death of the body comes second. Just as the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, all things follow this pattern. Anyone with eyes and feet must act in accordance with the laws of nature to accomplish anything.”

(Note: This passage criticizes the formalization of “ritual and propriety” in Daoism, emphasizing that “knowing the human heart” matters more than external rules. Confucius’s meeting with Bo Xuezi reveals a state of “teaching without words,” while Yan Hui’s questions point to the limits of deliberate imitation. The passage ultimately returns to the central idea of following the natural Dao.)

則存是入則亡萬物亦然有待也而死有待 也而生吾一受其成形而不化以待盡效物 而動日夜無隙而不知其所終薰然其成形 知命不能規乎其前丘以是日狙吾終身與 女交一臂而失之可不哀與女殆著乎吾所 以著也彼已盡矣而女求之以爲有是求馬 於唐肆也吾服女也甚忘女服吾也亦甚忘 雖然女奚患焉雖忘乎故吾吾有不忘者存 郭註心以死爲死乃更速其死其死之速由  哀以自喪也無哀則已有哀則心死者乃  哀之大也萬物莫不比方皆可見也目成  見功足成行功直以不見爲亡耳竟不亡  也待隱謂之死待顯謂之生竟無死生也  夫有不得變而爲無故一受成形則化盡  無期也效物而動自無心也日夜無隙化  恒新也不知其所終不以死爲死也薰然  其成形謂薰然自成又奚爲哉知命不係  於前而與變俱徃故曰徂夫變化不可執  而留也雖執臂相守而不能令停若哀死  者則此亦可哀也今人未嘗以此爲哀奚  獨哀死邪唐肆非停馬處言求向者之有  不可復得也人之生若馬之過肆耳恒無  駐須臾新故之相續不舍晝夜也著見也  言文殆見吾所以見者耳吾所以見者日  新也故已盡矣汝安得有之服者思存之  謂甚忘謂過去之速也言汝去忽然思之  恒欲不及女服吾也亦甚忘俱爾耳不問
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here employs vivid metaphors to discuss the principle of life-death transformation. All things exist in constant flux—what depends on certain conditions will perish, yet what relies on other conditions will be reborn. Once we obtain this physical form, we maintain it until life's end, moving and transforming like all things, ceaselessly through day and night without knowing our ultimate destination. Life forms spontaneously—why force it through deliberate effort?

Guo Xiang's commentary explains: Obsessively dwelling on death actually hastens demise, for this acceleration stems from self-lamentation. Without lamentation there is peace, but once sorrow arises, the spirit (Shen) dies—this constitutes the greatest tragedy. All phenomena can be mutually compared and observed: what eyes perceive counts as functional, what feet traverse counts as action, yet absence of perception doesn't equate to nonexistence. So-called "concealment" signifies death while "manifestation" signifies life, yet in truth there exists no absolute life or death.

Existence never transforms into nothingness—thus once form is obtained, transformation continues endlessly. Following things' movements occurs naturally without conscious intent, with ceaseless day-night changes perpetually renewing. Not knowing life's terminus means refusing to treat death as finality. Life forms spontaneously—why impose artificial striving? Understanding that destiny isn't predetermined but advances synchronously with transformation. Change cannot be grasped or halted—even clinging arm-in-arm cannot stop it. If one laments death, then this very attachment deserves lamentation.

Modern people don't recognize such clinging as tragic—why mourn death alone? It's like seeking a horse in an empty marketplace (Tangsi denotes a deserted market)—you'll never find the previously seen steed. Human existence resembles horses passing through markets, never pausing momentarily as old and new alternate endlessly day and night. "Manifestation" (zhu) means appearance—you likely only perceive my manifested aspects, yet these manifestations renew daily while former versions vanish. How could you possibly grasp them? "Attachment" (fu) refers to clinging memories, while "swift forgetting" (shen wang) indicates rapid dissolution of the past. Your sudden recollections always arrive too late—your memories of me fade just as quickly, following the same principle.

 賢之與聖未有得停者不忘者存謂繼之  以日新也雖忘故吾而新吾已至未始非  吾吾何患焉故能離俗絶塵而與物無不  冥也 孔子見老聃老聃新沐方將被髮而乾干慹 聶然似非人孔子便而待之少焉見曰丘也 眩與其信然與向者先生形體掘若槁木似 遺物離人而立於獨也老聃曰吾遊心於物 之初孔子曰何謂邪曰心困焉而不能知口 辟焉而不能言嘗爲女議乎其將至隂肅肅 至陽赫赫肅肅出乎天赫赫發乎地兩者交 通成和而物生焉或爲之紀而莫見其形消 息滿虛一晦一明日改月依日有所爲而莫 見其功生有所乎萌死有所乎歸始終相反 乎無端而莫知乎其所窮非是也且孰爲之 宗孔子曰請問遊是老聃曰夫得是至美至 樂也得至美而遊乎至樂謂之至人孔子曰 願聞其方曰草食之獸不疾易藪水生之蟲 不疾易水行小變而不失其大常也喜怒哀 樂不入於胷次夫天下也者萬物之所一也 得其所一而同焉則四支百體將爲塵垢而 死生終始將爲晝夜而莫之能滑而况得喪 禍福之所介乎棄隸者若棄泥塗知身貴於 隸也貴在於我而不失其變且萬化而未始 有極也夫孰足以患心已爲道者解乎此孔 子曰夫子德配天地而猶假(一作/偃)至言以脩 心古之君子孰能說脫焉老聃曰不然夫水
Interpretation

The wise and the sages never stagnate. They do not dwell in the past but constantly renew themselves. Though the old self is forgotten, the new self arrives—this remains the true self, so why worry? Thus they transcend worldly concerns and unite with all things.

When Confucius visited Laozi (Lao Dan), the latter had just washed his hair and was letting it dry while standing in deep meditation, appearing unlike ordinary men. Confucius withdrew to wait, then approached after a while and said: "Are my eyes deceived? Or were you truly standing still as withered wood just now, seeming to transcend all things and stand alone beyond humanity?" Laozi replied: "My heart was wandering in the realm where all things begin." Confucius asked: "What does this mean?" Laozi said: "The mind is perplexed yet cannot comprehend; the mouth opens yet cannot speak. Let me offer a metaphor: The ultimate Yin Qi is cold and austere, the ultimate Yang Qi scorching and bright. Yin Qi descends from heaven, Yang Qi rises from earth—their harmonious blending gives birth to all things. Something governs this process yet shows no form. Yin and Yang wax and wane, sun and moon alternate their course, acting daily yet leaving no trace of labor. Life has its dawn, death its return—an endless cycle without limit. Who can fathom its boundaries? If not this Dao, what could be the root?"

Confucius asked: "May I ask how to wander in such a realm?" Laozi replied: "Attaining this realm is the most beautiful and joyful. Those who experience supreme beauty and wander in supreme joy are called perfected beings (Zhiren)." When Confucius sought the method, Laozi said: "Grass-eating beasts don't fear changing pastures; water-born insects don't dread shifting streams—minor changes don't affect fundamental patterns. Let neither joy nor anger disturb your heart, knowing all under heaven shares one nature. Realizing this unity, you'll regard limbs as dust and view life-death transitions as natural as day-night alternation—how much more so petty gains and losses? Cast off external bonds like discarding mud, knowing your true self surpasses external things. Real worth lies in preserving your essence while harmonizing with endless transformations. Those who cultivate the Dao (the Way) understand this liberation." Confucius sighed: "Your virtue matches heaven-earth, yet you still refine your heart through supreme teachings—what ancient noble could surpass this!" But Laozi said: "Not so. Water's nature..." [Here the original text is fragmentary]

之於汋也無爲而才自然矣至人之於德也 不脩而物不能離焉若天之自高地之自厚 日月之自明夫何脩焉孔子出以告顔回曰 丘之於道也其猶醯雞與微夫子之發吾覆 也吾不知天地之大全也 郭註慹然似非人寂泊之至也遺物離人而  立於獨無其心身而後外物去也初者未  有而欻有遊於物初然後明有物之不爲  而自有也心困口辟欲令仲尼求之於言  意之表也議乎其將者試議隂陽以擬甸  之無形耳未之敢必也出天發地言其交  也莫見爲紀之形明其自爾也日改月化  者未嘗守故也莫見其功者自爾故無功  也生萌於未聚死歸於散所謂迎之不見  其首隨之不見其後也得至美而遊至樂  無美樂也死生亦小變耳知其小變而不  失其大常故喜怒哀樂不入於胷次知身  貴於隸故棄之若遺土耳苟知死生之變  所在皆我則所貴者我而我與變俱故無  失也己爲道者解乎此所謂懸解也老聃  謂天地日月皆不脩不爲而自得也醯雞  者甕中之蠛蠓孔子謂比吾全於老聃猶  甕中之與天地矣 莊子見魯哀公哀公曰魯多儒士少爲先生 方者莊子曰魯少儒哀公曰舉魯國而儒服 何謂少乎莊子曰周聞之儒者冠圜冠者知 天時履句履者知地形緩珮玦者事至而斷 君子有其道者未必爲其服也爲其服者未
Interpretation

Zhuangzi, in discussing the realm of "Wuwei" (non-action), states that the virtue of one who has attained the Dao (the perfected person) requires no deliberate cultivation—just as the heavens are naturally high, the earth naturally thick, and the sun and moon naturally bright. When Confucius heard this teaching, he said to Yan Hui, "My understanding of the great Dao is as shallow as a tiny gnat trapped in a vinegar jar. Had the Master (Laozi) not lifted the veil of my limitations, I would never have realized how vast and complete heaven and earth truly are."

Guo Xiang comments: Those who have attained the Dao may appear dull and unlike ordinary people, but in truth, they have reached the ultimate state of emptiness and stillness. Transcending external things, they stand alone in self-sufficiency, even forgetting their own existence—naturally freeing themselves from all worldly constraints. The primordial Dao (the origin) emerges suddenly from nothingness, wandering in the birthplace of all things, and thus realizes that the ten thousand things exist spontaneously, not through human artifice.

At the time, Confucius was inwardly confused yet stubbornly argumentative. Laozi sought to guide him beyond words and concepts to experience the great Dao directly. The transformations of Yin-Yang seem formless and traceless; the intercourse of heaven and earth follows no fixed pattern; the alternation of sun and moon never clings to old ways. The movement of the Dao leaves no trace of achievement, for it is simply so of itself. Life sprouts from chaos, and death returns to dissolution—just as the Daodejing says, "Approach it, and you will not see its head; follow it, and you will not see its back."

Those who reach the pinnacle of beauty have already transcended the concepts of beauty and ugliness; those who experience ultimate joy no longer cling to happiness. Life and death are but minor transformations—understanding this frees one from emotional turmoil. Though knowing the body is more precious than a servant, one can regard it lightly as dust; recognizing that the changes of life and death are manifestations of the "true self," one can dwell with transformation without losing oneself. Laozi says that heaven, earth, sun, and moon achieve their nature without cultivation or deliberate action. Confucius, mocking his own limitations in comparison to Laozi’s wisdom, likens himself to a gnat in a vinegar jar facing the vastness of heaven and earth.

Another passage records Zhuangzi meeting Duke Ai of Lu. The duke said, "There are many Confucian scholars in Lu, but few study your Daoist arts." Zhuangzi replied, "In truth, there are very few genuine Confucians in Lu." Puzzled, the duke asked, "How can you say so when the whole state wears Confucian robes?" Zhuangzi explained: "I have heard that true Confucians—those who wear round hats (symbolizing knowledge of celestial timings), square shoes (understanding earthly patterns), and jade pendants (resolute in decision-making)—are rare. Those with real learning do not necessarily wear specific garments, and those who wear such garments do not necessarily possess true knowledge."

必知其道也公固以爲不然何不號於國中 曰無此道而爲此服者其罪死於是哀公號 之五日而魯國無敢儒服者獨有一丈夫儒 服而立乎公門公即召而問以國事千轉萬 變而不窮莊子曰以魯國而儒者一人耳可 謂多乎 郭註德充於内者不脩飾於外 百里奚爵禄不入於心故飯牛而牛肥使秦 穆公忘其賤與之政也有虞氏死生不入於 心故足以動人 郭註内自得者外事全也 宋元君將畫圖衆史皆至受揖而立䑛筆和 墨在外者半有一史後至者儃但儃然不趨 受揖不立因之舍公使人視之則解衣般礴 贏君曰可矣是眞畫者也 郭註内足者神閒而意定 文王觀於臧見一丈人釣而其釣莫釣非持 其釣有釣者也常釣也文王欲舉而授之政 而恐大臣父兄之弗安也欲終而釋之而不 忍百姓之無天也於是旦而屬之夫夫曰昔 者寡人夢見良人黑色而𩑺髯乘駁馬而偏 朱蹄號曰寓而政於臧丈人庶幾乎民有瘳 乎諸大夫蹴然曰先君王也文王曰然則卜 之諸大夫曰先君之命王其無他又何卜焉 遂迎臧丈人而授之政典法無更偏令無出 三年文王觀於國則列士壞植散羣長官者 不成德皷瘐斛不敢入於四竟列士壞植散 羣則尚同也長官者不成德則同務也斔斛 不敢入於四竟則諸侯無二心也文王於是
Interpretation

This passage illustrates through several stories that true virtue (De) lies in inner cultivation rather than external display.

Duke Ai of Lu believed those wearing Confucian robes must be true scholars, so he ordered a nationwide ban on such attire with death penalty for violators. Within five days, only one person dared wear Confucian robes. Zhuangzi remarked: "If the entire state of Lu contains but one true scholar, can this be considered many?" Guo Xiang's commentary notes that those truly filled with virtue require no external adornments.

Baili Xi (a renowned statesman of the Spring and Autumn period) cared nothing for titles or stipends. While devoted to tending cattle, he raised exceptionally robust herds. Duke Mu of Qin consequently overlooked his humble origins and entrusted him with state affairs. Emperor Shun of the Youyu clan remained indifferent to life and death, yet moved others profoundly. Guo Xiang's commentary emphasizes that those with inner fulfillment naturally respond appropriately to external matters.

When Duke Yuan of Song summoned artists to paint, others arrived promptly with respectful bows and busy ink-grinding, while one latecomer entered composedly, simply loosening his robe to sit cross-legged. The duke declared: "This is the true artist." Guo Xiang observes that only those with inner richness maintain such calm concentration.

King Wen of Zhou encountered an old man fishing in Zang territory who appeared absentminded despite his angling. Wishing to appoint him as minister yet fearing official opposition, the king pretended a royal ancestor's dream commanded the old man's appointment. After three years of his governance, officials ceased factionalism, administrators stopped boasting achievements, and neighboring states abandoned nonstandard measuring vessels in trade. Guo Xiang's commentary concludes: "When scholars form no cliques, officials claim no merit, and lords harbor no divided loyalties, the world naturally attains harmonious unity."

焉以爲太師北面而問曰政可以及天下乎 臧丈人昧然而不應泛然而辭朝令而夜遍 終身無聞顔淵問於仲尼曰文王其猶未邪 又何以夢爲乎仲尼曰默女無言夫文王盡 之也而又何論刺焉彼直以循斯須也 郭註非持其釣有釣者竟無所求也不以得  失經意其於假釣而已尚同者所謂和其  光同其塵也不成德則同務者言潔然自  成則與衆務異也斔斛不入者言天下相  信故能同律度權衡也爲功者非已故功  成而身不得不退事遂而名不得不去名  去身退乃可以及天下矣文王盡之言任  諸大夫而不自任斯盡之也斯須者百姓  之情當悟未悟之頃故文王循而發之以  合其大情也 列御寇爲伯昏無人射引之盈貫措杯水其 肘上發之適的矢復覆沓方矢復寓當是時 猶象人也伯昏無人曰是射之射非不射之 射也嘗與女登高山履危石臨百仞之淵若 能射乎於是無人遂登高山履危石臨百仞 之淵背逡巡足二分垂在外揖御寇而進之 御寇伏地汗流至踵伯昏無人曰夫至人者 上闚青天下潜黄泉揮斥八極神氣不變今 女怵然有恂目之志爾於中也殆矣夫 郭註盈貫謂溢鏑也左手如拒右手如附枝  右手放發而左手不知故可措之杯水也  適矢復沓者矢適去復歃沓也方矢復寓
Interpretation

This passage recounts two allegorical stories that demonstrate Daoist wisdom through dialogues.

The first story tells of King Wen consulting the Elder Zang about statecraft. After listening in silence, the reclusive sage departed the next day. When Yan Hui asked Confucius why the virtuous king still sought guidance through dreams, Confucius explained that King Wen had already perfected governance (appointing the worthy without autocracy), merely guiding people according to their needs. Like fishing not for the catch, a ruler should transcend utilitarianism—blending with the populace without ostentation, establishing standardized measures to earn trust. Only by withdrawing after accomplishment can one truly benefit the world.

The second story features Lie Yukou (a master archer) demonstrating his skills to Bohun Wuren (an enlightened sage). He could shoot arrows with a cup of water balanced on his elbow without spilling a drop. Bohun Wuren dismissed this as "deliberate archery," then led him to a cliff to demonstrate "Wuwei (non-action) archery"—standing at the edge of an abyss, Lie Yukou collapsed trembling with sweat. The sage revealed: True perfected beings (those who attain the Dao) survey the blue heavens above and yellow springs below, remaining unshaken amidst peril. Lie Yukou's faltering spirit revealed his incomplete cultivation.

Note: The term "perfected being" (zhiren) represents Daoism's highest spiritual ideal; "Wuwei" denotes natural spontaneity without forced action. Together, these stories illuminate core Daoist principles of "governing through non-action" and "harmonizing with all things."

 者言前矢去未至的已復寄杯水於肘上  言其敏捷之妙也象人謂不動之至揮斥  猶縱放也夫德充於内則神滿於外無遠  近幽深所在皆明故審安危之機而泊然  自得也不能明至分故有懼有懼而所喪  多矣豈惟射乎 筆乘羅勉道云適矢復沓者矢去而復沓前  矢也方矢復寓者矢方發而後矢復寓於  弦上也范無隱則謂方矢猶方舟之方並  也言並執之矢已寓於弦非寓杯水於肘  上也郭論爲非 肩吾問於孫叔敖曰子三爲令尹而不榮華 三去之而無憂色吾始也疑子今視子之鼻 間栩栩然子之用心獨奈何孫叔敖曰吾何 以過人哉吾以其來不可却也其去不可止 也吾以爲得失之非我也而無憂色而已矣 我何以過人哉且不知其在彼乎其在我乎 其在彼邪亡乎我在我邪亡乎彼方將躊躇 方將四顧何暇至乎人貴人賤哉仲尼聞之 曰古之眞人知者不得說美人不得濫盜人 不得刦伏戲黄帝不得友死生亦大矣而無 變乎己况爵禄乎若然者其神經乎大山而 無介入乎淵泉而不濡處卑細而不憊充滿 天地既以與人己愈有 郭註曠然無係玄同彼我則在彼非獨世在  我非獨存也躊躇四故謂無可無不可伏  戲黄帝者功號耳非所以功者也故况功  號於所以功相去遠矣故其名不足以友
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here illustrates the transcendent state of those who have attained the Dao through several parables.

The first story describes an archer whose skill reaches unimaginable heights. Before the first arrow hits the target, the next is already nocked on the string, as effortlessly as balancing a cup of water on one's elbow. This metaphor depicts the marvelous external manifestation of those whose inner De (Virtue) overflows. They perceive all critical junctures of safety and danger while maintaining unshaken inner peace. Ordinary people, unable to see the essence of things, become anxious about gains and losses, thereby forfeiting even more.

The second story features a dialogue between Jianwu and Sunshu'ao. When Sunshu'ao was appointed prime minister of Chu three times, he felt no pride; when dismissed three times, he harbored no sorrow. He explained: What comes cannot be stopped, what goes cannot be retained. Since gains and losses aren't mine to determine, why worry? True wisdom lies in understanding that outcomes depend neither entirely on oneself nor external circumstances, but on following nature's course.

When Confucius heard this, he marveled: The ancient Zhenren (Perfected Persons) couldn't be persuaded by the wisest arguments, seduced by beauty, or threatened by robbers. Even sage-kings like Fuxi and the Yellow Emperor couldn't claim their friendship. Something as monumental as life and death couldn't alter their mental state—how much less could official positions or salaries? Such individuals' Shen (spirit) could pass through mountains unobstructed, plunge into abysses without getting wet, and dwell in lowly stations without distress. Their spirit fills heaven and earth; the more they give to others, the richer they become.

Guo Xiang's commentary observes: Those who reach the state of forgetting both self and worldly standards neither exclusively honor social conventions nor stubbornly cling to personal views. They respond to all situations with natural ease, recognizing no absolute standards of right and wrong. Titles like Fuxi or Yellow Emperor merely denote worldly achievements—far removed from true cultivation—hence empty fame isn't worth pursuing.

 於人也夫割肌膚以爲天下者彼我俱失  也使人人自得而已使人人自得者與人  而不損於己也其神明充滿天地故所在  皆可所在皆可故不損己爲物而放於自  得之地也 楚王與凡君坐少焉楚王左右曰凡亡者三 凡君曰凡之亡也不足以喪吾存夫凡之亡 不足以喪吾存則楚之存不足以存存由是 觀之則凡未始亡而楚未始存也 郭註言凡有三亡徵也不足以喪吾存遺凡  故也遺之者不以亡爲亡則存亦不足以  爲存矣曠然無矜乃常存也夫存亡更在  於心之所措耳天下竟無存亡   知北遊第二十二 知北遊於玄水之上登隱弅墳之丘而適遭 無爲謂焉知謂無爲謂曰予欲有問乎若何 思何慮則知道何處何服則安道何從何道 則得道三問而無爲謂不答也非不答不知 答也知不得問反於白水之南登狐闋之上 而覩狂屈焉知以之言也問乎狂屈狂屈曰 唉予知之將語若中欲言而忘其所欲言知 不得問反於帝宫見黄帝而問焉黄帝曰無 思無慮始知道無處無服始安道無從無道 始得道知問黄帝曰我與若知之彼與彼不 知也其孰是邪黄帝曰彼無爲謂眞是也狂 屈似之我與女終不近也夫知者不言言者 不知故聖人行不言之教道不可致德不可 至仁可爲也義可虧也禮相僞也故曰失道
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here employs several allegorical stories to elucidate the core Daoist concepts of "Wuwei" (non-action) and the "equality of all things."

The text begins by illustrating how someone who harms their own body for the sake of governing the world causes loss to both others and themselves. The truly wise approach allows everyone to find their own joy. Those who achieve this can give to others without diminishing themselves, their spiritual state filling heaven and earth, thus finding ease wherever they dwell. Because they are at ease everywhere, they need not harm themselves to accommodate external things, but can peacefully abide in self-contentment.

The story of the King of Chu and the Lord of Fan demonstrates: though the state of Fan was destroyed three times, its lord said "Fan's destruction cannot diminish my inner existence." Conversely, Chu's continued existence doesn't prove its true reality. This shows that survival and destruction are merely appearances - in essence, Fan was never truly destroyed, nor was Chu ever truly established. As Guo Xiang's commentary notes, true existence transcends concepts of survival and destruction; only by transcending attachments can one attain eternity.

The chapter "Knowledge Wanders North" recounts the story of "Knowledge" seeking the Dao: Knowledge traveled north to the Dark River, ascended Hidden Bluff, and met Non-Doer Saying. Three times he asked about the Dao, but received no reply. When he asked Madly Bent, the latter began to answer but forgot what to say. Finally, the Yellow Emperor told him: the true Dao requires no thinking, no deliberate pursuit, and no specific methods. The Emperor remarked that Non-Doer Saying had truly attained the Dao, Madly Bent was close to it, while eloquent speakers like themselves remained far from it. For "those who know don't speak; those who speak don't know" - the highest teaching is wordless instruction.

The passage concludes: the Dao cannot be forcibly sought; De (Virtue) cannot be deliberately attained; humaneness may be actively practiced; righteousness will always have shortcomings; and ritual easily becomes hypocrisy. Thus, clinging to these superficial forms leads one further from the true Dao.

而後德失德而後仁失仁而後義失義而後 禮禮者道之華而亂之首也故曰爲道者日 損損之又損之以至於無爲無爲而無不爲 也今已爲物也欲復歸根不亦難乎其易也 其唯大人乎生也死之徒死也生之始孰知 其紀人之生氣之聚也聚則爲生散則爲死 若死生爲徒吾又何患故萬物一也是其所 美者爲神竒其所惡者爲臭腐臭腐復化爲 神竒神竒復化爲臭腐故曰通天下一氣耳 聖人故貴一知謂黄帝曰吾問無爲謂無爲 謂不應我非不我應不知應我也吾問狂屈 狂屈中欲告我而不我告非不我告中欲告 而忘之也今予問乎若若知之奚故不近黄 帝曰彼其眞是也以其不知也此其似之也 以其忘之也予與若終不近也以其知之也 狂屈聞之以黄帝爲知言 郭註任其自行斯不言之教也道在自然非  可言致不失德故稱德稱德而不至矣禮  有常則矯效之所由生日損損華僞也華  去而朴全則雖爲而非爲以物失其所故  有爲物歸根之易惟大人耳大人體合變  化故化物無難也之變化之道者不以生  死爲異更相爲始則未知孰死孰生俱是  聚也俱是散也吾何患焉患生於異也各  以所美爲神竒所惡爲臭腐耳然彼之所  美我之所惡也我之所美彼或惡之故通  共神竒通共臭腐耳死生彼我豈殊哉以
Interpretation

This passage discusses the Daoist perspective on the gradual decline of "Dao" (the Way) and "De" (Virtue/Power), and the path to return to original authenticity.

When the original perfect "De" (natural virtue) was lost, people began emphasizing "ren" (artificial benevolence); when "ren" was lost, they turned to "yi" (moral principles); and when "yi" was lost, only "li" (ritual formalities) remained. "Li" is merely superficial ornamentation of the Dao and actually marks the beginning of chaos. Therefore, Dao cultivators must continually reduce external ostentation to ultimately reach the state of "wuwei" (non-action), through which they paradoxically achieve omnipotence.

Modern people are trapped by external things, making it difficult to return to their original nature—only the "great person" (enlightened one) who has attained the Dao can accomplish this effortlessly. Life and death form a cyclical continuum: human life is the gathering of Qi (vital energy), which manifests as life when concentrated and as death when dispersed. All things share the same essence—what people consider miraculous and what they deem foul can transform into each other, because all phenomena under heaven are transformations of the same Qi. The sage comprehends this principle of "oneness."

When the Yellow Emperor consulted Wuweiwei (an enlightened being), he received no reply; when he asked Kuangqu (a semi-enlightened being), the latter wanted to answer but forgot. The Yellow Emperor realized: true Dao attainers don't rely on words, and those who appear knowledgeable are actually further from the Dao. Hearing this, Kuangqu acknowledged the emperor's genuine understanding.

Guo Xiang's commentary adds: The Dao is fundamentally spontaneous and ineffable. Preserving one's natural disposition constitutes "De"—conscious striving prevents its attainment. Ritual norms easily breed hypocrisy. Only by reducing external embellishment can one return to simplicity. The "great person" adapts effortlessly to transformations, making the transmutation of external things natural. Those who understand the Dao of transformation make no distinction between life and death, beauty and ugliness, knowing these are all manifestations of Qi's condensation and dispersion. People's individual preferences are ultimately interconnected—the miraculous and the foul are originally one.

 不知爲眞是知之爲不近明夫自然者非  言知之所得故當昩乎無言之地先舉不  言之標而後寄明於黄帝則夫自然之冥  物槩乎可得而見也 筆乘無爲謂之眞是也以其不言也黄帝之  不近也以其言之也此特相與激揚此一  大事耳黄帝之於道實非減於無爲謂也  淨名經諸菩薩共論不二法門淨名獨默  然無言意以無言爲至矣乃舍利弗默然  天女不之許也曰解脫者不内不外不在  兩間言語文字亦不内不外不在兩間是  故無離言語文字說解脫相也知此則言  默一如知不知一體有思有慮亦可以知  道有處有服亦可以安道有從有道亦可  以得道何以故思慮盡空處服無所從亦  無從道實非道故耳 天地有大美而不言四時有明法而不議萬 物有成理而不說聖人者原天地之美而達 萬物之理是故至人無爲大聖不作觀於天 地之謂也今彼神明至精與彼百化物已死 生方圓莫知其根也扁然而萬物自古以固 存六合爲巨未離其内秋毫爲小待之成體 天下莫不沈浮終身不固隂陽四時運行各 得其序惛然若亡而存油然不形而神萬物 畜而不知此之謂本根可以觀於天矣 郭註無爲者任其自爲不作者唯因任也觀  於天地者觀其形容象其物宜與天地不  異也與彼百化者百化自化而神明不奪
Interpretation

This passage explores the profound Daoist philosophy of "non-speaking" (不言) and "natural non-action" (自然无为). True wisdom does not reside in verbal expression, as the Dao (the Way) inherently transcends language. While the Yellow Emperor (the legendary sovereign who attained the Dao) expounded Daoist teachings through words, genuine realization must be experienced in silence.

In the Vimalakīrti Sutra (净名经), when bodhisattvas discussed the "Dharma gate of non-duality" (不二法门), Vimalakīrti (净名) responded with silence, considering wordlessness the highest state. Yet the celestial maiden pointed out that true liberation neither depends on language nor rejects it—both thought and speech can be paths to enlightenment, provided one remains unattached. At the ultimate stage of contemplation, even the concept of "emptiness" must be relinquished; at the pinnacle of cultivation, even the name "Dao" must be transcended.

Heaven and earth manifest sublime beauty without speaking; the four seasons follow their orderly course without explanation; all beings grow according to inherent patterns without declaration. The sage who has attained the Dao emulates this naturalness: the perfected person (至人) refrains from deliberate action, and the great sage avoids forceful interference. Like the vast cosmos where life and death appear rootless yet have existed spontaneously since antiquity—from the macrocosm of the six directions (六合) to the microcosm of an autumn hair's tip—all follow the natural order of yin-yang and the four seasons. This state, seemingly chaotic yet mysteriously precise, nurturing all without claiming merit, constitutes the essence of the Dao.

Guo Xiang (郭象), the Wei-Jin metaphysician, annotates: "Non-action" (无为) means letting all things develop autonomously, while "non-creation" (不作) signifies pure alignment with nature. Observing heaven and earth teaches us to embrace all phenomena without interference, allowing everything to transform according to its inherent nature, while the inner spirit (natural law) remains eternally unperturbed.

 也死者已自死生者已自生圓者已自圓  方者已自方未有爲其根者故莫知也自  古以固存言不待爲之而後存也六合未  離其内者計六合在無極之中則陋矣秋  毫待之成體者秋毫雖小非無亦無以容  其質也不故日新也運行各得其序不待  爲之也昭然若存則亡矣故惛然潔然有  形則不神矣故油然畜之而不得其本性  之根故不知其所以畜也可以觀於天者  與天同觀也 齧缺問道乎被衣被衣曰若正汝形一汝視 天和將至懾汝知一汝度神將來舍德將爲 汝美道將爲汝居汝瞳焉如新生之犢而無 求其故言未卒齧缺睡寐被衣大說行歌而 去之曰形若槁骸心若死灰眞其實知不以 故自持媒媒晦晦無心而不可與謀彼何人 哉舜問乎丞曰道可得而有乎曰汝身非汝 有也汝何得有夫道舜曰吾身非吾有也孰 有之哉曰是天地之委形也生非汝有是天 地之委和也性命非汝有是天地之委順也 孫子非汝有是天地之委蛻也故行不知所 徃處不知所持食不知所味天地之彊陽氣 也又胡可得而有耶孔子問于老聃曰今日 晏間敢問至道老聃曰汝齋戒䟽瀹而心澡 雪而精神掊擊而知夫道窅然難言哉將爲 汝言其崖略夫昭昭生於冥冥有倫生於無 形精神生于道形本生于精而萬物以形相
Interpretation

This scripture expounds the Daoist teachings on natural disposition and the Dao.

Life that is destined to perish naturally fades away, while new life naturally emerges. Round things naturally appear round, square things naturally appear square—none of this has a deliberate master, so people cannot fathom its origin. Since ancient times, the Dao has eternally existed; it does not require human intervention to be. The six directions of heaven and earth (the cosmos) are all embraced within the Dao. If we place the cosmos within the boundless (Wuji), it appears limited. Though the fine down of autumn birds and beasts is minuscule, without the Dao, even this could not take form.

All things operate according to natural order, needing no human interference. Deliberately pursuing the Dao causes one to lose it; excessive attachment to form leads to the loss of spiritual (Shen) essence. The Dao naturally nourishes all things without revealing its root, so people do not understand how it sustains them. Those who can observe the Dao of heaven become one with it.

Nie Que asked Bei Yi about the Dao. Bei Yi told him: "Straighten your body and focus your gaze, and natural harmony will arrive. Restrain your cleverness and unify your thoughts, and the spirit will come to dwell within. De (Virtue) will make you whole, and the Dao will abide with you. Be like a newborn calf, pure and without desires." Before he finished speaking, Nie Que fell asleep. Delighted, Bei Yi left singing: "Form like withered wood, mind like dead ashes—those who truly understand the Dao do not cling to old notions. Dull and uncalculating, they cannot be schemed with. What manner of men are these!"

Shun asked Cheng: "Can the Dao be possessed?" Cheng replied: "You don't even possess your own body—how could you possess the Dao?" Shun asked: "Then who possesses my body?" Cheng said: "It is form bestowed by heaven and earth. Your life is not yours—it is the harmony bestowed by heaven and earth. Your nature and destiny are not yours—they are the accord bestowed by heaven and earth. Your descendants are not yours—they are the continuity bestowed by heaven and earth. Thus you walk without knowing where you go, dwell without knowing what sustains you, eat without tasting flavors. This is all the movement and transformation of heaven and earth's Yang Qi—how could you possess any of it?"

Confucius asked Lao Dan (Laozi) about the supreme Dao. Laozi said: "First purify your mind through fasting, cleanse your spirit, and cast aside knowledge. The Dao is profound and hard to describe! I'll give you the general outline: Light is born from darkness, form from formlessness, spirit from the Dao, and body from spirit. All things generate and continue through forms."

生故九竅者胎生八竅者卵生其來無迹其 徃無崖無門無房四達之皇皇也邀於此者 四枝强思慮恂達耳目聦眀其用心不勞其 應物無方天不得不高地不得不廣日月不 得不行萬物不得不昌此其道與且夫愽之 不必知辯之不必慧聖人以斷之矣若夫益 之而不加益損之而不加損者聖人之所保 也淵淵乎其若海魏魏乎其終則復始也運 量萬物而不匱則君子之道彼其外與萬物 皆徃資焉而不匱此其道與中國有人焉非 隂非陽處于天地之間直且爲人將反于宗 自本觀之生者喑醷物也雖有壽夭相去幾 何須臾之說也奚足以爲堯桀之是非果蓏 有理人倫雖難所以相齒聖人遭之而不違 過之而不守調而應之德也偶而應之道也 帝之所興王之所起也人生天地之間若白 駒之過卻忽然而已注然勃然莫不出焉油 然漻然莫不入焉已化而生又化而死生物 哀之人類悲之解其天弢墮其天𧙍紛乎宛 乎魂魄將徃乃身從之乃大歸乎不形之形 形之不形是人之所同知也非將至之所務 也此衆人之所同論也彼至則不論論則不 至明見無值辯不若默道不可聞聞不若塞 此之謂大得 郭註夫利害相攻則天下皆羿也自不遺身  忘知與物同波者皆遊于羿之彀中耳雖  張毅之出單豹之處猶未免於中地則中
Interpretation

This passage explores the fundamental relationship between the essence of life and the natural Dao. It points out that viviparous creatures possess nine orifices (the seven facial orifices plus the excretory organs), while oviparous creatures have eight (lacking one orifice). Life comes and goes without trace, having no fixed gateway—like a palace with thoroughfares in all directions. Those who align with this natural Dao develop robust limbs, unhindered thinking, sharp hearing and clear vision. Their minds operate effortlessly, responding to all things without rigid patterns.

Heaven and Earth follow inevitable natural laws: Heaven cannot but be high, Earth cannot but be vast, the sun and moon cannot but move, and all things cannot but flourish—this is the manifestation of Dao. Sages don't rely on erudition or debate to comprehend truth. They understand that certain things neither increase by addition nor diminish by subtraction—this is the foundation to preserve. Such Dao is as profound as the ocean, as towering as mountains, cycling endlessly without exhaustion.

Fundamentally, life is but a temporary coagulation of Qi (vital energy), where differences in lifespan matter little. Just as melons and fruits each have their veins, human relationships—though complex—are navigated by sages through accommodation rather than force. The rise of imperial dynasties follows the same principle. Human existence is as fleeting as sunlight passing through a crack, with all things perpetually transforming between life and death—a truth everyone intuitively grasps.

Those who truly understand Dao don't argue; those who argue don't truly understand. Dao cannot be heard with ears—genuine realization lies in silence. Like the archer Yi's legendary marksmanship (from Zhuangzi's "The Sign of Virtue Complete"), those obsessed with gain and loss live as if trapped at the center of a target. Even exemplary figures like Zhang Yi (the socialite) and Shan Bao (the hermit)—archetypal characters from Zhuangzi—cannot avoid being hit. Only those who forget themselves and unite with nature transcend such limitations.

(Note: The "center of Yi's target"典故 alludes to Zhuangzi's metaphor for contentious circumstances; Zhang Yi and Shan Bao represent two contrasting lifestyles in Daoist philosophy.)

 與不中唯在命耳而區區者各有其所遇  而不知命之自爾故免乎弓矢之害者自  以爲巧欣然多已及至不免則自恨其習  而志傷神辱斯未能達命之情也夫我之  生也非我之所生也則一生之内百年之  中其坐起行止動靜趣舍性情知能非所  有者凡所無者凡所爲者凡所遇者皆非  我也理自爾耳而横生休戚乎其中斯又  逆自然而失者也人之生也非情之所生  也生之所知豈情之所知哉  所資借形本生於精者由精以至粗也萬  物雖以形相生亦皆自然耳故胎卯不能  易種而生明神氣之不可爲也夫率自然  之性遊無跡之塗者故形骸於天地之間  寄精神於八方之表是以無門無房四達  皇皇逍遥六合與化偕行也人生而遇此  道則天性全而精神定天地萬物皆不得  不然而自然耳非道能使然也是以聖人  斷棄知慧付之自然使各保正分而已無  用知慧爲也若海者容恣無量也終則復  始者與化俱也用物而不役己故不匱此  明道之贍物在於不贍不贍而物自得故  曰此其道與言至道之無功無功乃足稱  道也非隂非陽無所偏名直且爲人者敖  然自放所遇而安了無功名也反於宗者  不逐末也喑醷物者直聚氣也死生猶未  足殊况壽夭之間哉果蓏有理言物無不  理但當順之人倫有知慧之變故難也然
Interpretation

This passage speaks of how humans should follow the natural Dao and avoid forcing outcomes. Human life is not something we can fully control—our experiences, actions, and dispositions throughout life are not entirely within our command, as they all operate according to natural laws. When we insist on forcing things against nature, we bring suffering upon ourselves.

Those who narrowly avoid misfortune often attribute it to their own cleverness, becoming smug and self-satisfied. Yet when calamity does strike, they lament and blame themselves, damaging their spirit. This happens because they fail to understand that destiny unfolds naturally according to its own principles.

All things in existence arise from the transformation of Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy), evolving from the subtle to the coarse through natural processes. Just as a bird's egg cannot hatch a snake, the workings of Shen (spirit) and Qi cannot be forced. Those who align with their innate nature exist physically within heaven and earth while their spirit roams freely beyond the eight directions, moving in harmony with creation.

One who comprehends this principle preserves their heavenly nature and stabilizes their spirit. The myriad things of heaven and earth operate spontaneously, not because the Dao deliberately arranges them. Thus, sages discard cleverness and artifice, following nature's course and allowing all things to find their proper place. Like the ocean that never runs dry while receiving countless rivers, they cycle endlessly, abiding with creation.

The true Dao is impartial and undivided—it transcends Yin-Yang distinctions and stands beyond material concerns. Those who return to their original state do not chase after trivialities but gather Qi and concentrate their Shen. Even life and death are not worth excessive concern, let alone the length of one's lifespan. All things follow their natural patterns, and humans need only align with them. It is precisely because of human cleverness and contrivance that we find it difficult to follow nature's way.

 其知慧自相齒耳但當從而任之遭而不  違順所遇也過而不守宜過而過也調偶  和合之謂也帝王之所興起如斯而已隙  駒忽然乃不足惜出入者變化之謂耳言  天下未有不變也已化而生又化而死俱  是化也生物哀之死物不哀矣人類悲之  死類不悲矣解弢墮袠言獨脫也紛宛者  變化氤氲也大歸者無爲用心於其間也  不形形乃成若形之則敗其形矣務則不  至俛然不覺乃至也明見無值闇至乃值  默而塞之則無所奔逐故大得也 東郭子問於莊子曰所謂道惡乎在莊子曰 無所不在東郭子曰期而後可莊子曰在螻 蟻曰何其下邪曰在稊稗曰何其愈下邪曰 在瓦甓曰何其愈甚邪曰在屎溺(乃弔/反)東郭 子不應莊子曰夫子之問也固不及質正獲 之問於監(平/聲)市履豨也每下愈况汝唯莫必 無乎逃物至道若是大言亦然周徧咸三者 異名同實其指一也嘗相與遊乎無何有之 宫同合而論無所終窮乎當相與無爲乎澹 而靜乎漠而清乎調而閒閑乎寥已吾志無 徃焉而不知其所至去而來不知其所止吾 已徃來焉而不知其所终彷徨乎馮頻閎大 知入焉而不知其所窮物物者與物無際而 物有際者所謂物際者也不際之際際之不 際者也謂盈虛哀殺晒彼爲盈虛非盈虛彼
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here expounds the philosophical concept that the Dao (the Way) is omnipresent. When Dongguozi asked where the Dao could be found, Zhuangzi replied that the Dao exists in all things—from ants and weeds to tiles and even excrement. As Dongguozi found these examples increasingly vulgar, Zhuangzi explained: Just as market inspectors determine a pig's fatness by feeling its lower legs (jian shi lü xi), the humbler the example, the more it demonstrates universal truth.

Zhuangzi points out that the Supreme Dao (zhidao) resembles words like "universal," "all-pervading," or "omnipresent"—different names sharing identical essence. He describes a transcendent state: roaming through the palace of emptiness while maintaining serene detachment, adapting effortlessly to circumstances. Those who attain this wisdom merge with the transformations of all things without constraint, understanding that while phenomena have boundaries (wu ji), these limits are themselves relative (bu ji zhi ji).

Regarding the transformations of life and death, Zhuangzi asserts all things exist in perpetual flux—birth and death being but different phases of change. The living may grieve death, yet death itself holds no sorrow. True liberation (jie tao duo zhi) means transcending these external forms; by not forcing outcomes (bu xing xing nai cheng), one attains fulfillment, whereas insistence leads to failure. Aligning with the Dao through subtle resonance (an zhi nai zhi) surpasses deliberate pursuit (ming jian wu zhi). Maintaining silent non-action (mo er sai zhi) paradoxically yields the greatest attainment (da de).

爲衰殺非衰殺彼爲本末非本末彼爲積散 非積散也 郭註期而後可欲令指名所在也質標質也  言無所不在而方竒怪此斯不及質也豨  大豕也夫監市之履豕以知其肥瘦者愈  履其難肥之處愈知豕肥之要今問道之  所在而每况之於下賤則明道之不逃於  物也必矣若必謂無之逃物則道不周矣  道而不周則未足以爲道大言亦然明道  不逃物也若遊乎有則不能周徧咸也故  同合而論之然後知道之無不在知道之  無不在斯能曠然無懷而遊彼無窮也澹  靜漠清調間此皆無爲故也寥已吾志謂  寥然空虛志苟寥然則無所徃矣無徃焉  故徃而不知其所至有徃焉則理未動而  志已驚矣去來不知所止斯順之也徃來  不知所終言但徃來不由於知耳不爲不  徃來也徃來者自然之常理也其有終乎  馮閎者虛廓之謂也大知遊乎寥廓恣變  化之所如故不知也物物者無物而物自  物耳物自物耳故冥也物有際故每相與  不能冥然眞所謂際者也不際者雖有物  物之名直明物之自物耳物物者竟無物  也物其安在乎既明物物者無物又明物  之不明自物則爲之者誰乎哉皆忽然而  自尔也 妸阿荷甘與神農同學於老龍吉神農隱几 闔户晝暝妸荷甘日中奓户而入曰老龍死 矣神農隱几擁杖而起嚗剥然放杖而笑曰
Interpretation

Here Zhuangzi discusses the omnipresence of Dao (the cosmic origin and operating principle). He employs a vivid analogy: just as market inspectors determine a pig's fatness by pressing where it's hardest for the animal to gain weight, similarly, the more we observe humble ordinary things, the clearer we see that Dao truly permeates all existence.

To claim Dao exists only in certain things would negate its universality. The true Great Dao encompasses everything. Understanding this liberates the mind to roam freely through infinite realms. Maintaining a serene, detached attitude while following natural transformations—this is the state of wuwei (non-forced action).

When one's consciousness achieves transparent clarity, it no longer fixates on destinations. For genuine coming and going are but natural rhythms, without absolute beginnings or endings. The profoundly wise wander through vast emptiness, flowing with all transformations without imposition. Though phenomena appear bounded, they fundamentally arise and perish according to nature.

The subsequent anecdote tells of E'ahogan and Shennong (legendary father of herbal medicine) studying under Old Dragon Ji. At noon one day, E'ahogan opened the door announcing their master's death. The napping Shennong rose leaning on his staff, then suddenly laughed and cast it aside. This illustrates how awakened beings transcend attachment to life and death, recognizing them as mere phases of natural transformation.

天如予僻陋慢訑移故棄予而死已矣夫子 無所發予之狂言而死矣夫弇綱弔聞之曰 夫體道者天下之君子所繫焉今於道秋毫 之端萬分未得處一焉而猶知藏其狂言而 死又况夫體道者乎視之無形聽之無聲於 人之論者謂之冥冥所以論道而非道也於 是泰清問乎無窮曰子知道乎無窮曰吾不 知又問乎無爲無爲曰吾知道曰子之知道 亦有數乎曰有曰其數若何無爲曰吾知道 之可以貴可以賤可以約可以散此吾所以 知道之數也泰清以之言也問乎無始曰若 是則無窮之弗知與無爲之知孰是而孰非 乎無始曰不知深矣知之淺矣弗知内矣知 之外矣於是泰清中而歎曰弗知乃知乎知 乃不知乎孰知不知之知無始曰道不可聞 聞而非也道不可見見而非也道不可言言 而非也知形形之不形乎道不當名無始曰 有問道而應之者不知道也雖問道者亦未 聞道道無問問無應無問問之是問窮也無 應應之是無内也以無問待問窮若是者外 不觀乎宇宙内不知乎大初是以不過乎崑 崙不遊乎太虛 郭註起而悟夫死之不足驚故還放杖而笑  也自肩吾以下皆以至言爲狂而不信也  故非老龍連叔之徒莫足與言矣君子所  繫言體道者人之宗主也秋毫之端細矣  又未得其萬分之一藏其狂言以死明夫
Interpretation

Here Zhuangzi explores the profound nature of the Dao through a dialogue between fictional characters. Tianru (a fictional figure) laments his shallow understanding and dies abandoned by his teacher. Yangangdiao (another fictional character) observes that those who truly comprehend the Great Dao attract followers from all noble-minded people, while those with partial understanding at least know to conceal their presumptuous words before death.

Taiqing (a truth-seeker) inquires successively of Wuxiong and Wuwei (symbolizing different aspects of the Dao) whether they understand the Way. Wuxiong replies "I do not know," while Wuwei claims to know the Dao's characteristics—that it can be noble or humble, gathered or dispersed. Perplexed by these contradictory answers, Taiqing consults Wushi (symbolizing the Dao's origin).

Wushi explains: The one who says "I do not know" actually understands more profoundly, because the Dao transcends sensory perception—it cannot be heard, seen, or clearly articulated. The true Great Dao cannot be obtained through questions and answers; the questioner fundamentally doesn't understand, and the responder cannot truly convey it. The Dao is like that which gives form to the formless—it should not be named at all.

Guo Xiang (the commentator) adds that this dialogue reveals death holds no cause for fear. From Jianwu (a truth-seeker in Zhuangzi) onward, people have dismissed profound truths as mad ravings. Thus, except for realized beings like Lao Long (Laozi) and Lianshu (a wise figure in Zhuangzi), none can truly discuss the Great Dao. The "tip of autumn down" metaphor illustrates how infinitesimal our understanding of the Dao is—not even one ten-thousandth of its totality. Yet those who conceal their wild words before death already demonstrate deeper awareness of the Dao's unfathomability than ordinary people.

(Note: "Lao Long" refers to Laozi, while "Lianshu" represents a sage figure in Zhuangzi. "Autumn down" denotes the fine new hair of autumn animals, symbolizing the most minute things.)

 至道非言之所得也唯在乎自得耳冥冥  而猶復非道明道之無名也凡得之不由  於知乃冥故默成乎不見不聞之域而後  至焉知形形之不形言形自形耳形形者  竟無物也有道名而竟無物故名之不能  當也不知故問問之而應則非道也不應  則非問者所得故雖問之亦終不聞也無  問無應是絶學去教歸於自然之意問窮  所謂責空也實無而假有以應者外矣若  夫婪落天地遊虛涉遠以入乎冥冥者不  應而已矣 光曜問乎無有曰夫子有乎其無有乎光曜 不得問而孰視其狀貌窅然空然終日視之 而不見聽之而不聞搏之而不得也光曜曰 至矣其孰能至此乎予能有無矣而未能無 無也及爲無有矣何從至此哉 郭註此皆絶學之意也於道絶之則夫學者  乃在根本中來矣故學之善者其惟不學  乎 大馬之捶鉤者年八十矣而不失毫芒大馬 曰子巧與有道與曰臣有守也臣之年二十 而好捶鉤於物無視也非鉤無察也是用之 者假不用者也以長得其用而况乎無不用 者乎物孰不資焉 郭註玷捶鉤之輕重而無毫芒之差也都無  懷則物來皆應 冉求問於仲尼曰未有天地可知邪仲尼曰 可古猶今也冉求失問而退明日復見曰昔 者吾問未有天地可知乎夫子曰可古猶今 也昔日吾昭然今日吾昧然敢問何謂也仲
Interpretation

Here Zhuangzi explores the supreme truth that transcends language and knowledge. The true Dao cannot be attained through words but must be realized through inner awakening. What appear to be profound doctrines are not the actual Dao, for the Great Way itself is nameless. True understanding comes not through accumulation of knowledge, but through silent realization in wordless states.

He illustrates this with examples: We recognize forms of things, yet the origin that gives them form is itself formless. Though we name it "Dao," it cannot be equated with any particular thing. To question the Dao is fundamentally mistaken—if it could be answered, it wouldn't be the true Dao; if unanswered, the questioner gains nothing. Thus the highest state is neither questioning nor answering, completely relinquishing study and teaching to return to one's natural essence.

The text presents a parable: Guangyao (representing illuminating wisdom) asks "Non-Being" (representing the formless origin): "Do you exist or not?" Only to discover the other has no form or appearance—invisible to sight, inaudible to hearing, intangible to touch. Guangyao sighs: "This is indeed the ultimate state! I can comprehend 'being' and 'non-being,' yet cannot reach the level of 'non-non-being.'"

Guo Xiang's commentary notes that true learning means abandoning deliberate study. Like the eighty-year-old craftsman serving Grand Marshal who forged hooks with perfect precision—his secret lay in sixty years of single-minded focus where nothing existed in his awareness except hooks. This demonstrates how ultimate concentration achieves "great function" through what appears to be a state of "non-use."

Finally, when Ran Qiu asks Confucius "What existed before Heaven and Earth formed?" the reply is "The same as now." This seemingly paradoxical answer reveals the eternal truth beyond time: what seemed clear yesterday appears obscure today—such fluctuations in understanding prove one hasn't touched the unchanging essence. The true Dao transcends temporal changes, remaining identical through past and present.

尼曰昔之昭然也神者先受之今之昩然也 且又爲不神者求邪無古無今無始無終未 有子孫而有子孫可乎冉求未對仲尼曰已 矣未應矣不以生生死不以死死生死生有 待邪皆有所一體有先天地生者物邪物物 者非物物出不得先物也猶其有物也猶其 有物也無己聖人之愛人也終無已者亦乃 取於是者也 郭註仲尼言天地常存乃無未有之時虛心  以待命斯神受也思求則更致不了非惟  無不得化而爲有也有亦不得化而爲無  矣是以有之爲物雖於變萬化而不得一  爲無也故自古無未有之時而常有也子  孫言世世無極也言其要有由不得無故  而有傳世故有子孫不得無子而有孫也  如是天地不得先無而今有也夫死者獨  化而死耳非生者生此死也生者亦獨化  而生死生無待獨化而足各自成體誰得  先物者乎哉吾以隂陽爲先物而隂陽即  所謂物耳誰又先隂陽者乎吾以自然爲  先之而自然即物之自爾耳吾以至道爲  先之矣而至道者乃至無也既以無矣又  奚爲先然則先物者誰乎哉而猶有物無  己明物之自然非有使然也聖人愛人無  己者亦取於自尔故恩流百代而不廢也 顔淵問乎仲尼曰回嘗聞諸夫子曰無有所 將無有所迎回敢問其遊仲尼曰古之人外 化而内不化今之人内化而外不化與物化
Interpretation

This passage records a dialogue between Confucius (Zhongni) and his disciples Ran Qiu and Yan Hui, exploring core Daoist concepts of life and death, being and non-being.

Confucius begins by saying: "The truths understood in the past were first grasped by the spirit (shen). Now when we feel confused, is it because we're pursuing things beyond the spiritual realm? In truth, there's no distinction between ancient and modern, beginning and end—just as one cannot have descendants before procreating." Before Ran Qiu could respond, Confucius continues: "Stop—no need to answer. Life and death are not mutual transformations. Life doesn't arise from death, nor does death emerge from life. Each exists independently in its own state."

Guo Xiang's commentary explains: Confucius viewed heaven and earth as eternally existent, without moments of "non-existence." Deliberate attempts at understanding only lead us further from truth. Being doesn't transform into non-being, nor vice versa—though phenomena change endlessly, their essence remains constant. Like an unbroken lineage of descendants, heaven and earth never transition from nothingness. Death results from a thing's own transformation, not conversion from life; likewise, life emerges autonomously. All things complete their changes independently, requiring no external conditions.

The discussion then turns to "what preceded all things": Some say yin-yang, but these are themselves phenomena; others suggest ziran (spontaneity), yet this simply describes things' natural state; still others posit the supreme Dao (ultimate truth), which is precisely "ultimate non-being." Since it's non-being, how can we speak of it "preceding"? This demonstrates all things arise spontaneously without external compulsion. The sage's selfless care for humanity mirrors this natural principle, allowing his beneficence to endure for generations.

Finally, Yan Hui asks Confucius: "Master, you once spoke of 'neither sending forth nor welcoming'—what does this mean?" Confucius replies: "The ancients adapted outwardly while maintaining inner constancy, whereas modern people are inwardly unsettled yet outwardly rigid, forever dragged by external things." Here we see the Daoist practitioner's ideal: external conformity with worldly norms while preserving inner authenticity—a concept resonating with Zhuangzi's teaching of "outer transformation with inner non-transformation."

者一不化者也安化安不化安與之相靡必 與之莫多豨韋氏之囿黄帝之圃有虞氏之 宫湯武之室君子之人若儒墨者師故以是 非相𩐎齎也而况今之人乎聖人處物不傷 物不傷物者物亦不能傷也唯無所傷者爲 能與人相將迎山林與臯壤與使我欣欣然 而樂與樂未畢也哀又繼之哀樂之來吾不 能禦其去弗能止悲夫世人直爲物逆旅耳 夫知遇而不知所不遇知能能而不能所不 能無知無能者固人之所不免也夫務免乎 人之所不免者豈不亦悲哉至言去言至爲 去爲齊知之所知則淺矣 郭註以心順形而形自化以心使形故外不  化常無心故一不化一不化乃能與物化  化與不化皆任彼耳斯無心也無心而恣  其自化非將迎而靡順之必與之莫多言  不將不迎則足而止也囿圃宫室言夫無  心而任化乃羣聖之所遊處也𩐎和也儒  墨之師天下之難和者而無心者猶能和  之而况其凡乎處物不傷至順也物不能  傷在我而已無心故至順至順故能無所  將迎而義冠於將迎也山林臯壤未善於  我而我便樂之此爲無故而樂也無故而  樂亦無故而哀則所樂不足樂所哀不足  哀也世人不能坐忘自得而爲哀樂所寄  如逆旅耳知之所遇者即知之知之所不  遇者即不知也所不能者不能强能也由
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist wisdom of "being mindless yet harmonizing with all things." The true sage who has attained the Dao (the Way) can follow the transformations of all beings without being harmed by external phenomena, because they maintain inner emptiness and stillness. Just like the hunting grounds of Xiwei (an ancient ruler), the gardens of the Yellow Emperor, the palaces of Emperor Shun, or the dwellings of Kings Tang and Wu - these were all places where sages followed nature's course.

Even Confucian and Mohist scholars who cling stubbornly to their judgments of right and wrong can be harmonized by this mindless attitude, let alone ordinary people. The sage interacts with external things without harming them, and thus external things cannot harm the sage. Only those who remain unharmed can achieve perfect harmony with all existence. While mountains and wilderness may bring joy, before this joy ends, sorrow may arrive. We cannot prevent these emotions from coming and going - worldly people are like passing travelers at the mercy of external phenomena.

People always insist on knowing what cannot be known and doing what cannot be done. Yet to acknowledge there are things one doesn't know and cannot do is simply human nature. Isn't it pitiful to stubbornly attempt the fundamentally impossible? The highest wisdom requires no words; the greatest action involves no deliberate striving. To forcibly standardize all knowledge results only in shallow understanding.

Guo Xiang's commentary adds: When the mind (Shen) follows the body, the body naturally transforms; when the mind dominates the body, external appearances remain unchanged. Only by maintaining mindlessness can one truly change along with all things. Whether transforming or not transforming, let both occur naturally. Neither deliberately conforming nor resisting - this is sufficient. The dwelling places of all sages embody this attitude of following nature's course.

 此觀之知與不知能與不能制不由我也  當付之自然耳無知無能人所不免言受  生各有分也至言至爲皆自得也由知而  後得者假學者耳故淺也
Interpretation

This passage reveals that human cognitive and behavioral capacities are not entirely within our conscious control. The most profound wisdom and abilities are actually the result of aligning with natural predispositions. Every person possesses innate endowments and limitations—those most sublime expressions and actions emerge as spontaneous outpourings of one's essential nature.

When knowledge or capability must be acquired through deliberate study, it merely constitutes "artificial learning" dependent on external means, ultimately remaining superficial. As Zhuangzi observed, intentional striving inevitably becomes inferior, paling in comparison to the depth achieved through natural spontaneity. Here we see the Daoist principle of Wuwei (non-action) governance manifested, emphasizing the paramount importance of returning to original simplicity and harmonizing with nature.

(Note: Zhuangzi Yi is Ming dynasty scholar Jiao Hong's commentary on the Zhuangzi. This passage elucidates Zhuangzi's core perspective regarding "natural predispositions.")

莊子翼卷之五

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5h0057); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 4 Vol. 6 →