中文 · EN

《南華真經註疏》Vol. 1

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Qing Daoist texts 清代道教文獻 Vol. 1 / 5 1,936 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經註疏》 Vol. 1 (Qing Daoist texts 清代道教文獻, 5 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 4 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經註疏》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

南華眞經注疏序 予友復圭子旣疏道德經矣識者咸喜太上之嫡派出始知其 淵源然南華爲道德而發明也其文辭浩蕩其旨歸邃邈其底 裏直探混溟始無始而終無終學者又恨途迷復圭云齊諧者 志怪也則鯤魚鵬鳥吾惡知其說安可踵前人之妄註數載以 來復圭時潛心南華癸酉春頓悟其爲丹經之祖鯤魚卽丹經 之水虎鵬鳥卽丹經之火龍二語參破一部南華莫不迎刃而 解矣昔註自郭象向秀而下迄今焦猗園所集老莊翼而上何 啻百種不知道德豈知南華經中有說禪處惟陸西星得其皮 肉至聖諦中之眞色不色眞空不空仙佛殊途同歸乃骨隨也 雖陸西星亦茫然矣莊子慨千載而下道術分裂而世界缺陷 不以太古無爲之道提醒之必不能返有爲於渾噩躋仁義爲 道德况鬬心之習熾而功利之學盛將安所底止乎其曰無爲 也用天下而有餘有爲也爲天下用而不足卽吾儒君逸臣勞 之道也其曰無入而藏無出而陽柴立其中央卽玄門食毋之 道也其曰以生死爲一條可不可爲一貫卽釋氏不生不滅之 道也學者細味南華之註疏非惟道釋二家不可一日無卽吾 儒達而在上者有復古之志必以無爲之治爲最上窮而在下 者有進取之心必以道德爲勝仁義惡可以其理不必耳目經 語不必古今道掊擊聖智殫殘名法而訾議之乎大抵南華一
Interpretation

Preface to the Commentary and Subcommentary on the True Classic of Southern Florescence

My friend Mr. Fugui has completed his commentary on the Classic of the Dao and Its Virtue. All who understand the matter rejoice that the orthodox lineage of the Supreme Lord Lao has at last been brought to light, making its origins clear. Yet the Classic of Southern Florescence was written precisely to expound the Classic of the Dao and Its Virtue. Its language is vast and surging, its central meaning profound and remote, and its substance reaches directly into the beginning of the dark, primordial expanse—without beginning and, in the end, without end. Scholars have struggled to find their way through it. Mr. Fugui said, “The Record of the Unusual was a book of strange tales. How can I know the true meaning of its account of the Kun fish and the Peng bird? How can I avoid repeating the mistakes of earlier commentators, who speculated recklessly?” For several years, Fugui devoted himself to the Classic of Southern Florescence. Then, in the spring of the guiyou year, he suddenly awakened to its meaning: this classic is in truth the ancestor of the Elixir Classics. The Kun fish is the “Water Tiger” of the Elixir Classics, and the Peng bird is their “Fire Dragon.” Once these two phrases are penetrated, the whole Classic of Southern Florescence becomes clear, with every difficulty yielding readily.

From Guo Xiang and Xiang Xiu onward, through the collection Laozi and Zhuangzi: Wings, compiled by Jiao Yiyuan, there have been more than a hundred commentaries, even among the finest. Yet commentators did not know that the Classic of the Dao and Its Virtue also contains teachings on Chan; only Lu Xixing grasped a little of their surface. The heart of the matter lies in the highest truth: “True form is formless; true emptiness is not empty.” The Immortals and the Buddhas follow different paths, yet arrive at the same destination. Even Lu Xixing remained bewildered by this, though it is the very marrow of the teaching.

Zhuangzi lamented that, a thousand years later, the Dao arts would be divided and the world left incomplete. Unless he reminded people of the ancient Dao of Wuwei, they could not return from deliberate action to uncarved simplicity, or raise benevolence and righteousness to the level of Dao and De. What is more, the habit of contention grows ever stronger and the pursuit of profit ever more widespread—where will it end? Zhuangzi says, “With Wuwei, one has more than enough to serve the world; with action, one is not enough for the world’s use.” This is precisely the Confucian way of “the ruler at ease while the ministers labor.” He says, “Enter nowhere and be hidden; emerge nowhere and shine; stand like a bare tree at the center.” This is the Daoist practice of “feeding on Qi.” He says, “Regard life and death as one thread, and ‘yes’ and ‘no’ as one whole.” This is the Buddhist way of “neither arising nor ceasing.”

Scholars should study the commentaries and subcommentaries on the Classic of Southern Florescence with care. Not only could the Daoist and Buddhist traditions not go a single day without it; our Confucian tradition, too, can draw on it. Those who rise to positions of influence and authority, if they aspire to restore the ancient ways, must regard government through Wuwei as the highest form of rule. Those who remain obscure and low in station, if they seek to advance, must understand that Dao and De surpass benevolence and righteousness. How, then, can one attack or denounce these teachings merely because their principles need not be verified by the senses and their language need not conform to every age, or because they strike at sage wisdom and exhaust the systems of names and laws?

In general, the book known as the Classic of Southern Florescence…

(The rest of the text concerns specific methods of Elixir practice: visualization techniques such as picturing a human form being pierced, Qi entering the plain area of the navel, and Shen gathering as the gaze turns inward; as well as stages of practice such as “breathing out and drawing in the three horses” and making nine revolutions as a cycle. These are the essential teachings of Neidan and primordial Qi: extracting gold from life as a ladder for its return. Their meaning is interconnected and gives a profound account of what Wenqiang describes.)

經十萬餘言皆先行其言也故言言皆閫奥昔人註南華豈惟 不必行且未知而言故其所註多剿說而於道德性命如嚼蠟 然予玩南華註疏有如食蜜中邊皆甜可謂前無古而後無今 矣胡膂力方剛輙棄科場而訪道註疏大得南華之神後有讀 之而朝徹者不可忘先知先覺開來學之功也昔朱紫陽註經 書爲千古之的解今復圭子註疏道德南華亦爲千古之玄解 兩者皆新安人故予序之爲並不朽云            晉陵友弟鄒忠允頓首拜序 南華眞經註疏自序 復圭子曰道德經爲三教之祖 太上憫人不悟性命之學無傳不得不化身作南華以洩其秘 凡爲寓言猶詩之比體教人全性保命也重言亦借重於古人 而欲人信彼保全性命之說也巵言千變萬化膾炙其詞使人 悅於口因悅於心而索彼立言之正意自欲跳出世網而遊神 於性命之域也其津筏後學者可謂至矣南華之註始於郭象 繼之向秀終於焦猗園之老莊翼百有餘家尙隔山萬重卽聰 明如李青蓮讀南華而賦鯤鵬且認虛爲實其詞愈縱恣而背 眞意愈遠無怪世儒指鸞鳳爲山雞視神龍爲妖幻也竊思易 之所謂老夫得其女妻如枯楊生稊也妙法蓮花經佛受龍女 之獻珠寶也維摩經云不入煩惱大海則不能得一切智寶也 雲巖禪師云百花叢内過一葉不黏身卽丹經取坎塡離之旨
Interpretation

Preface by Zou Zhongyun

(Zou Zhongyun, a friend and younger brother from Jinling, bows his head in respect and offers this preface.)

The complete text of the True Classic of Southern Florescence (Nanhua Zhenjing) runs to more than a hundred thousand characters. Much of it follows a pattern of stating an idea first, then unfolding it at length, so nearly every sentence reaches into profound depths. Earlier commentators on the Nanhua often failed to put its teachings into practice themselves, and wrote before they had grasped its meaning. Their commentaries largely repeated what had been said before. When they discussed the study of Dao and De, and of nature and life, their words were like chewing wax: dull and tasteless.

Reading this commentary on the True Classic of Southern Florescence, by contrast, is like eating honey: sweet from edge to center. It may be said to have no equal among those who came before or those who will come after. Master Hu, its author, is still in the prime of life, yet he gave up the civil service examinations to devote himself to seeking the meaning of the Dao. His commentary penetrates the very spirit of the Nanhua. Should future readers awaken to its meaning through this work, as if suddenly enlightened at dawn, they must not forget the pioneering work of those who knew and understood before them, and who opened the way for later students.

In antiquity, Zhu Xi, known as Zhu Ziyang, commented on the classics and set a standard for the ages. Now Fu Guizi has written commentaries on the Dao De Jing and the Nanhua, offering profound interpretations that may likewise endure for ages. Both men came from Xin’an. I write this preface in the hope that their names may be passed down together and remain imperishable.


Fu Guizi’s Preface to His Commentary on the True Classic of Southern Florescence

Fu Guizi says: The Dao De Jing may be regarded as the ancestral text revered by the Three Teachings. The Most High (a Daoist title for the supreme deity), moved by compassion for people who could neither understand the study of nature and life—the way of preserving one’s original nature and nurturing life—nor receive its true transmission, had no choice but to manifest as the Perfected One of Southern Florescence, Zhuangzi, and write the Nanhua to reveal its hidden intent.

Its parables are like the metaphorical mode of poetry, using things to illuminate principles, and their purpose is to teach people to preserve their nature and safeguard their lives. “Repeated sayings” lend added weight to the teaching by putting it in the mouths of the ancients, so that people will trust and follow the teaching on preserving life. “Cup sayings”—words that change with their vessel and take no fixed form—vary in countless ways. Their pleasing language delights the mind, prompting readers to seek the true intent behind the words and leading them to wish to escape the world’s entanglements and let their spirit roam in the realm of nature and life. For later students, the text serves as a bridge and boat across the waters; its usefulness could hardly be greater.

Commentaries on the Nanhua began with Guo Xiang, continued with Xiang Xiu, and culminated in Jiao Gan’s Wings to Laozi and Zhuangzi. Across the ages there have been more than a hundred commentators, yet they remain separated from the truth by layer upon layer of mountains. Even Li Qinglian, Li Bai, for all his brilliance, read the Nanhua and composed his “Rhapsody on the Great Peng” while mistaking the empty for the real. The freer his language became, the farther he strayed from the true meaning. Small wonder that worldly scholars take phoenixes for pheasants and regard divine dragons as monstrous fantasies.

I reflect on these words: the Book of Changes says, “An old man takes a young wife; a withered poplar puts forth new shoots,” suggesting that life may arise amid what seems contrary to the natural order. The Buddha in the Lotus Sutra accepts the dragon girl’s offering of a jewel; the Vimalakirti Sutra says, “Unless one enters the great sea of afflictions, one cannot obtain the jewel of omniscience”; and Chan Master Yunyan says, “Pass through a thicket of flowers without a leaf clinging to your body.” All these point to the same intent as the alchemical texts’ teaching of “taking Kan to fill Li,” an image in Neidan for harmonizing Yin-Yang, water and fire. Without understanding this, one’s commentary on the Nanhua is like eating honey without tasting it: all one’s words are wasted.

其有不合也有不同也入門煉已之異也易之所謂殊途也其 無不合也無不同也成功究竟之一也易之所謂殊途而同歸 也佛祖云我娘生我我還先仙師云先有吾身後有天[⺡(夾/水)]園先 生之作南華蓋身在天地之先也予今之註疏南華敢云身在 天地之先特知九天九地積氣積塊之所以然耳或問何物爲 生天地予曰混沌以前不惟無天地且無五行獨有一乾金耳 此金有氣無質乃造化之根也故能生天地因而生水爲五行 之始仙家之金丹釋氏之金剛不過竊先天之乾金耳學者須 知金水爲凡鉛水中金爲眞鉛但得有眞鉛以制木火之飛騰 何愁無眞汞以制金水之沈重故鉛汞交而内丹結矣然則搬 運一身之鉛汞者不知靜裏孤修氣轉枯也偏倚採取之術者 不知眞空不空眞色不色也旣聞大道之人當訪外護覓雲朋 尋福地三者缺一必爲羣魔作障緣若果三千八百功行與天 齊自然有鼎烹龍虎矣予先人程兩峯翁酷好讀南華每有超 見因予過庭而輒以垂訓予曷敢忘焉昔人謂南華爲道德之 註疏予今本道德而註疏南華眞醉者之初醒而夢者之忽覺 乎予之不敢秘而以註疏授剞劂氏也其不敢獨醒而欲與天 下共醒不敢獨覺而欲與天下共覺乎倘太上與南華仙翁嘉 予註疏之勞早爲予作外護侶伴之合則赴龍沙之會爲有期
Interpretation

This passage discusses methods of cultivation and the origin of Heaven and Earth. Its meaning in plain language is as follows:

How cultivation methods differ and converge

Some methods may appear different because they emphasize different things at the stages of entering the path and refining oneself. This is like the “different paths” spoken of in the Book of Changes: the routes differ. Yet in the end, none cannot be united and none cannot become one. All reach completion and fulfillment, as the Book of Changes says: “Different paths lead to the same destination.” The Buddha said, “My mother gave birth to me, yet I came first”; an Immortal Master said, “My body existed first, before Heaven and Earth.” The commentators on the True Classic of Nanhua claimed that they themselves existed before Heaven and Earth. In my commentary on the Nanhua today, I dare not claim that I existed before Heaven and Earth. I only understand how the nine heavens and nine earths, and the accumulated Qi and accumulated matter, came into being.

Where Heaven and Earth came from

Someone asked, “What gave birth to Heaven and Earth?” The answer: Before chaos, there was not only no Heaven and Earth; there were not even the Five Phases. There was only a single Qian Metal. This Metal had Qi but no substance. It was the root of creation and transformation, and so it could give birth to Heaven and Earth, as well as to Water, which is the beginning of the Five Phases. The Golden Elixir of the Immortals and the vajra of the Buddhists both draw upon primordial Qian Metal. Students must understand: Metal and Water are ordinary lead; Metal within Water is true lead. With true lead, one can restrain Wood and Fire as they surge and soar; with true mercury, one can restrain the heaviness of Metal and Water. When lead and mercury unite, the Neidan (internal alchemy) is formed.

Essentials of cultivation

But if you merely circulate the lead and mercury within your own body, without knowing that solitary cultivation in stillness can cause Qi to turn dry and depleted. If you focus exclusively on methods of gathering and replenishing, without understanding that true emptiness is not empty and true form is not form, you will go astray. Once you have heard the Great Dao, you should seek an outer protector, find companions among the clouds, and look for a blessed land. If even one of these three is lacking, a host of demons will surely turn it into an obstructing condition. When your three thousand eight hundred meritorious deeds and practices are equal to Heaven, a cauldron will naturally be ready to cook the Dragon and Tiger.

How this commentary came about

My ancestor, the elder Cheng Liangfeng, loved reading the Nanhua and often had insights that went beyond the ordinary. When I was growing up in his household, he would frequently instruct me, and I dare not forget his teachings. People of old said that the Nanhua was a commentary on the Daode Jing. Today I take the Daode Jing as my basis for commenting on the Nanhua—it is like a drunkard suddenly sobering, or a dreamer abruptly waking. I dare not wake alone; I hope all under Heaven will wake with me. I dare not be enlightened alone; I hope all under Heaven will become enlightened with me. If the Most High and the Immortal Elder of Nanhua approve of the effort I have put into this commentary, may they soon join me with an outer protector and companion; then the time for my journey to the gathering at Dragon Sand will be near.

異日召予以供呼鸞駕鶴之役未可知也然而不敢必也則予 作註疏之心也夫              海陽程以甯薰沐拜撰 南華眞經注疏題詞 夫道德南華二經之在天地間也猶珠藏澤媚玉韞山輝而人 間之有此經也猶抱璞於山而懷蚌於淵也得寶而不見寶眞 千古之一大恨予友復圭子南生而北學入齊魯之科場而蹶 於齊魯不知者以爲時命大謬也知之者以爲 太上與仙翁正不欲其立功名於一時而欲其立言於百世爾 故復圭得以知命之年而遊方外以性命之學而註疏道德南 華經數年晝夜不倦非仙翁累顯神通復圭安能壯其精神愈 鼓而愈旺乎然則世之僞儒有心怖二氏而口稱爲異端者有 行無儒行而陽黜二氏以附儒者覩此註疏不愧欲死乎然則 二經信爲三教之全經而人間有藏二經之註疏者無論其知 與不知何異剖璞見玉開蚌得珠乎何異太空一旦雲開霧撤 而三教中人今日始得見 太上與南華之眞面目乎天下倘有因面目而知索其精神者 則傳神集之名爲不虛矣
Interpretation

A Plain-Language Interpretation

One day, I may be summoned to take up an immortal office such as “summoning phoenixes and riding cranes.” I cannot yet say for certain. But this is the resolve that moved me to write this commentary and exposition.


Inscription for the Commentary and Exposition on the Nanhua Perfected Scripture

The Dao De Jing and the Nanhua Perfected Scripture (that is, the Zhuangzi) are two classics that, between Heaven and Earth, are like a bright pearl hidden in a deep pool and fine jade glowing within a mountain. When these classics are preserved in the human world, it is like someone holding uncut jade in the mountains or keeping a pearl-bearing shell in the depths: they have clearly come upon a treasure, yet cannot recognize it as one. This has been a great regret throughout the ages.

My friend, Master Fugui, was born in the south but went north to study. He once sat for the civil service examinations in the Qi-Lu region, but did not pass. Those who do not understand think his luck was simply poor. Those who do understand say that perhaps the Most High Lord Lao and the Perfected Nanhua (Zhuangzi) did not want him to win fame and success in his own time. Instead, they wished him to set down his learning in books and pass it on for generations to come.

So, at the age when he knew Heaven’s Mandate, Fugui traveled beyond the ordinary world. Drawing on the learning of nature and life, he annotated and explained the Dao De Jing and the Nanhua Perfected Scripture, laboring day and night for years without growing weary. If the Immortal Elder had not repeatedly manifested his powers, how could Fugui’s spirit have grown ever more vigorous and his strength ever more abundant as he wrote?

Now, when those false Confucians of the world—who fear Buddhism and Daoism in their hearts but denounce them as heresies with their mouths, or who lack the true cultivation of a Confucian yet outwardly reject Buddhism and Daoism to curry favor with Confucians—see this commentary and exposition, should they not be so ashamed that they wish the ground would open beneath them?

These two scriptures can thus be regarded as the complete foundation of the Three Teachings: Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism. When commentaries on them are preserved in the human world, whether or not readers understand them, it is like cutting open unworked jade to reveal true jade, or opening a shell to find a bright pearl. It is also like the clouds and mist parting from the vast sky, allowing those within the Three Teachings, today, to see the true faces of the Most High and Nanhua.

If anyone in the world, upon seeing these “faces,” seeks out the spirit within them, then the title Collection for Capturing the Spirit will be well deserved.


Respectfully composed after ritual purification by Cheng Yining of Haiyang

Respectfully inscribed with a deep bow by the Daoist friend Wang Boxiu, known as Liaofan, of the same county

         同邑道友了凡汪伯修頓首拜題

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5i0036); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

Vol. 2 →