中文 · EN

《冲虚至德真经四解(高守元)》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 Vol. 3 / 9 25,000 characters

About this page. The original text of 《冲虚至德真经四解(高守元)》 Vol. 3 (Taixuan 太玄部, 9 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 44 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《冲虚至德真经四解(高守元)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

势极则反,必然之数。 今吾心无逆顺者也,则鸟兽之视吾,犹其侪也。故游吾园者,不思高林旷泽;寝吾庭者,不愿深山幽谷,理使然也。 圣人所以陶运群生,使各得其性,亦犹役人之能将养禽兽,使不相残害也。 卢曰:夫形质各有殊,神气则不异也。故《庄子》云:视其异也,则肝瞻楚越。视其同也,则万物一体矣。至人以神会之也。入鸟不乱行,入兽不乱群者,逆顺同志而不迕。故猛兽可养,海鸥可狎也。夫禽兽之入深山幽谷者,欲全其身远人害也。苟无其虞乱群者,逆顺同志而不迕。故猛兽可养,海鸥可狎也。夫禽兽之入深山幽谷者,欲全其身远人害也。苟无其虞,则园庭之与山林,夫何异哉?
Interpretation

When a tendency reaches its extreme, it turns to its opposite—this is an inevitable law. When things develop to an extreme, they shift toward the contrary aspect; this is an inevitable regularity.

Now there is no longer any distinction between adverse and favorable in my mind, and so birds and beasts regard me as one of their own kind. For this reason, the birds and beasts that play in my garden no longer long for tall forests and open wilds; those that rest in my courtyard do not wish to go to deep mountains and secluded valleys—this is brought about by principle.

The reason the sage can mold and transform the myriad things, enabling each to attain its own nature, is just like a skilled tamer who is good at raising birds and beasts and keeps them from harming one another.

Lu Chongxuan comments: the physical forms and constitutions of the myriad things differ, but Shen (spirit) and Qi (vital energy) are no different. Thus Zhuangzi says: viewed from the perspective of difference, the liver and gallbladder are as distant as Chu and Yue; viewed from the perspective of sameness, the myriad things are one whole. The perfected person—one of the highest moral cultivation—attunes Shen and Qi to the myriad things. When birds join their flocks, they do not disturb their ranks; when beasts join their herds, they do not disturb their groups. This is because such a person shares the mind and will of the myriad things and does not conflict with them whether circumstances are favorable or adverse. Therefore fierce beasts can be tamed, and seagulls can be approached. The reason birds and beasts go deep into mountain forests and secluded valleys is that they wish to preserve themselves and stay far from harm by humans. If they had no such anxiety, what difference would there be between gardens and courtyards and mountain forests?

政和:天下之至柔驰聘天下之至坚,此圣人所以为大胜之道也。虎狼,兽之猛者,雕鹗,禽之攫者。异类杂居,不相搏噬,而自得於园庭之内,则所以调而驯之者,有其道故也。性命之情,顺之则安。喜怒或过,阴阳并毗。逆之使怒,岂顺其性命之情?故养虎者,时其饥饱,达其怒心。凡以顺其性命之情而已。吾岂敢逆之使怒,谓不违其性也;亦不顺之使喜,谓不淫其性也;夫喜之复也必怒,怒之复性命之情而已。吾岂敢逆之使怒,谓不违其性也;亦不顺之使喜,谓不淫其性也;夫喜之复也必怒,怒之复也常喜,皆道之过也;今吾心无逆顺,则既不违其性使之怒,又不淫其性使之喜,彼之安处而自适也,宜矣。圣人之养生,不使好恶内伤其身,达之至於育万物,和天下,岂有他哉?以此而已。 范曰:有血气者,不能无喜怒。故禽默异类,而喜怒之情常因於人之逆顺。善养虎者,不敢逆之使怒,亦不顺之使喜,故禽兽异类,视之犹侪也。然则袭诸人间,人道之息,固有甚於养虎者,惟圣人处物不伤物,故物亦莫之能伤。《庄子》寓言,於《人间世》亦有养虎之说,盖明乎此。
Interpretation

Zhenghe Commentary:

The softest thing under Heaven can gallop freely through the hardest thing under Heaven; this is precisely the principle by which the sage achieves the great victory. Tigers and wolves are the fiercest of beasts, while eagles and ospreys are the most skilled at seizing among birds. Animals of different species live together without fighting and biting one another, and can dwell at ease within gardens and courtyards, because there are methods for nurturing and taming them. In human beings, the true condition of nature and life (that is, the reality of human nature and life) becomes peaceful when followed. If joy and anger are excessive, the Qi of Yin-Yang becomes disordered and disturbs itself. If one opposes it and provokes its anger, how can that still be following the true condition of nature and life? Therefore tiger keepers must grasp the timing of its hunger and fullness and vent its anger; their aim is nothing more than following its true condition of nature and life.

I dare not oppose it and make it angry—this is called not going against its natural disposition; nor do I follow it and make it joyful—this is called not excessively indulging its natural disposition. After joy there is necessarily a turn to anger, and after anger there is often a turn back to joy; these are all faults of the Dao. Now my mind makes no distinction between opposing and following: I neither go against its nature and provoke anger nor indulge its nature and make it joyful, and they naturally dwell in peace and ease, as is only right. When the sage nourishes life, he does not allow feelings of liking and disliking to injure himself; extending this to nurturing the myriad things and harmonizing the world, what other principle is there? It is simply this.

Fan Commentary:

Creatures of blood and Qi cannot be without joy and anger. Thus for birds and beasts and other kinds, their feelings of joy and anger often change according to whether people oppose or accommodate them. One skilled at keeping tigers dares not oppose it and provoke its anger, nor follow it and make it joyful; for this reason the beast looks upon him as a companion. Then the dangers of the human world and the decline of the human way are inherently more serious than keeping tigers. Only the sage, in his dealings with the world, harms no external things; therefore no external thing can harm him. The parable in Zhuangzi, in the chapter “In the Human World,” also contains a saying about keeping tigers; it is probably intended precisely to explain this principle.

Final Sentence of the Scripture:

The sentence “Yan Hui asked Zhongni, saying: ‘I, who keep tigers…’” is a fragment; one can only see that it introduces the discussion of keeping tigers in the “In the Human World” chapter of Zhuangzi. The way of keeping tigers in “In the Human World” is roughly as follows: the tiger keeper feeds it at regular times and does not give it whole living creatures, so as to avoid arousing its killing intent; this illustrates that only by following the other’s nature can one avoid harm.

颜回问乎仲尼曰:吾养虎者,惟圣人处物不伤物,故物亦莫之能伤。《庄子》寓言,於《人间世》亦有养虎之说,盖明乎此。 颜回问乎仲尼曰:吾尝济乎觞深之渊矣,津人操舟若神。吾问焉,曰:操舟可学邪?曰:可。能游者可教也,善游者数能。 向秀曰:其数自能也,言其道数必能不惧舟也。 乃若夫没人,则未尝见舟而谡操之也。谡,所六切。 护,起也。向秀曰:能骛没之人也。骛,音木。 吾问焉,而不告。敢问何谓也? 卢曰:善操舟者,能学之也。善游浮者,串习之也。至乎没人,未尝见舟而得者,斯乃神会,彼不能违。 政和:操舟若神者,道济天下,不可窥测故也。能游者可教,谓其不溺於物。善游者游浮者,串习之也。至乎没人,未尝见舟而得者,斯乃神会,彼不能违。 政和:操舟若神者,道济天下,不可窥测故也。能游者可教,谓其不溺於物。善游者数能,谓其久於其道。乃若夫没人,则未尝见舟而谡操之,则妙而不可知矣。问焉而不告,则道至於此不可以告人故也。 仲尼曰:荩吾与若玩其文也久矣,而未达其实,而固且道与。荩音衣。 见操舟之可学,则是玩其文;未悟没者之自能,则是未至其实;今且为汝说之也。 能游者可教也,轻水也;善游者之数能也,忘水也。 忘水者,则无矜畏之心也。
Interpretation

Yan Hui asked Confucius, saying, “I once crossed a dangerous deep pool called Shangshen, where the boatman handled the boat with a skill that seemed divine. I asked him, ‘Can this skill of boat-handling be learned?’ The boatman said, ‘Yes. One who can swim can be taught, and one who is good at swimming often grasps it very quickly.’”

Xiang Xiu’s commentary says: “‘Shu neng’ means being able from birth; it means that people of this kind are thoroughly proficient in this art and naturally do not fear riding in a boat.”

As for those who dive to the bottom of the water, they have never seen a boat, yet they can maneuver in the water with ease, as if they were born knowing how.

Lu Chongxuan’s commentary says: One who is good at handling a boat can learn it; one who is good at floating becomes skillful through repeated practice. As for the diver, who has never seen a boat yet can handle one, this is because his spirit accords with the Dao, and others cannot contravene it.

The Zhenghe commentary says: His boat-handling is like the divine because his Dao can ferry and save the world, and ordinary people cannot fathom it. “One who can swim can be taught” means that he is not deluded by external things. “One who is good at swimming is shu neng” means that he has long applied effort in this art. As for the diver, who has never seen a boat yet can handle one, this is so profound and mysterious that it cannot be explained clearly. Yan Hui asked but Confucius did not answer because this Dao, having reached this level, cannot be told to others in words.

Confucius said: You and I have savored these words for a long time, yet we have not grasped their substance. Let me speak of it here for now. To see that boat-handling can be learned is merely to savor the words; not to have understood the diver’s “natural ability” is still not to have touched the substance. Now I will explain it clearly to you.

“One who can swim can be taught” because he can regard the water lightly; “one who is good at swimming is shu neng” because he forgets the water. Having forgotten the water, he has no hesitancy or fear.

(Note: The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing is the Liezi; this passage comes from the “Dasheng” chapter of the Liezi. Shangshen was the name of a dangerous deep pool in ancient times.)

乃若夫没人之未尝见舟也而谡操之也,彼视渊若陵,视舟之覆犹其车却也。覆却万物方陈乎前,而不得入其舍。 神明所居者,故谓之舍也。 恶往而不暇?所遇皆间暇也。以瓦抠者巧,以钩抠者惮,以黄金抠者惛。 神明所居者,故谓之舍也。 恶往而不暇?所遇皆间暇也。以瓦抠者巧,以钩抠者惮,以黄金抠者惛。 互有所投曰抠。郭象曰:所要愈重,则其心愈矜也。 卢曰:见操舟可学者,玩其文也。若会其真者,彼则视水如陵,覆溺不入其灵府矣。何往而不闲暇哉?以瓦投物者,但见其巧,中而不惮於失瓦也。若以钩投物,则不专於巧,中更恐失钩之拙也。若以黄金为投者,不敢祈中,惟惧失金之损矣。是知向时之妙,忘於外物,今时之惧,惜於外物也。代人知矜外之两失,而贪物以丧其生。 巧一也,而有所矜,则重外也。凡重外者拱内。 唯忘内外,遗轻重,则无巧拙矣。 政和:荩与噫同。盖医者,意也。谓之荩玚t或有救其失之义。能游者可内。 唯忘内外,遗轻重,则无巧拙矣。
Interpretation

First Section: The Realm of the Good Swimmer

Those skilled at diving may never have seen a boat, yet as soon as they take one in hand they can steer it. They regard the deep abyss as they would level ground, and they regard a boat capsizing as ordinary as a cart rolling backward. Even the overturning and destruction of the myriad things, placed right before their eyes, cannot enter their minds.

Second Section: The Dwelling of Shenming

“Shenming” refers to the spirit and the mind; “she” is the place where the spirit and mind reside. Because it is where the spirit and mind dwell, it is called “she.”

Third Section: The Mind Without Hindrance

Where, then, could such a person go and lack leisure? For everything they encounter allows them to be calm and at ease. If a tile is used as the object of a throw, one merely concentrates on displaying skill; if a belt hook is used, fear arises in the mind; if gold is used, one becomes dazed and uneasy.

“Kou” means throwing at one another. Guo Xiang’s commentary says: the more important the thing to be obtained, the more restrained the mind becomes.

Lu Chongxuan’s Explanation

Lu Chongxuan holds that to see others steering a boat and think one can learn it is merely to admire its outward form. If one truly grasps its subtle essence, one will be like the good swimmer: one regards water as flat ground, and even if the boat capsizes and people drown, this will not invade the spirit and mind. When people are free of worry, wherever they go they are leisurely and self-possessed. In throwing with a tile, one only cares about skill; even if one hits the mark, one does not mind losing a tile. In throwing with a hook, one does not focus on skill; one fears both hitting the mark and losing the hook. In throwing with gold, one dares not hope to hit the mark and only worries about losing the gold. Thus the earlier excellence lay in forgetting external things, while the later fear is attachment to external things. This shows that if a person is constrained by external things, they will fail on both sides; in greedily seeking external things, they instead lose their own life.

A Guo Xiang-Style Summary

Skill is originally one and the same, but to have something held in the mind is to value external things. Whoever values external things will have their inner mind bound.

The State of Forgetting Inner and Outer

Only by forgetting the distinction between inner and outer and not calculating light and heavy, gain and loss, can one be without the distinction between cleverness and clumsiness.

Zhenghe’s Commentary

“Jin” and “yi” are interchangeable. The term “physician” carries the sense of “intention.” This sentence means that there is a principle for remedying one’s mistakes. Only one who can roam freely within it can guard the inner mind.

Summary Again

Only by forgetting inner and outer and making no distinction between light and heavy is there no difference between skill and clumsiness.

政和:荩与噫同。盖医者,意也。谓之荩玚t或有救其失之义。能游者可教也,轻水也,则入水之溺,不累其形。善游者数能,忘水也,则蹈水之道无变於己。若夫没人之未尝见舟也而谡操之也,则物我如一,不疑其所行矣。死生惊惧不入乎胸中,而况利害之端乎?此所以视渊若陵,视舟之覆犹其车却覆却,万物方陈乎前而不得入其舍,无往而不暇也。彼内资於道不深则外变於物亦易矣。故以瓦抠者巧,以钩抠者惮,以黄金抠者惛也。先儒无往而不暇也。彼内资於道不深则外变於物亦易矣。故以瓦抠者巧,以钩抠者惮,以黄金抠者惛也。先儒谓互有所投曰抠,盖探筹投钩之谓也。惟所要愈重,则用心愈矜。故以瓦则巧,以钩则惮,以金则惛。惮则恐失而已,至於惛则若亡矣。故曰重外者拱内,拱内者心有所系,而不能休休焉之类也。 范曰:古之乘道德以浮游者,虚己而无累,刳心而无物。涂却守神,物无自入焉,乌往而不暇耶?一有所矜,讵能无内拙之患?
Interpretation

The commentator “Zhenghe” says: “‘Jin’ and ‘yi’ are interchangeable, both being sounds of sighing. The word written as ‘medicine’ is to be understood as ‘intention,’ carrying the sense of using it to remedy a fault. Those who can swim can be instructed, because they take water lightly; thus even when they fall into water, their bodies are not submerged. One skilled at swimming has superior technique because he forgets the water; therefore he treads the water and moves, merging with the patterns of water and not altering himself. As for the man who has never seen a boat yet can steer one, this is because things and self are as one, and he does not doubt his actions. The terrors of life and death cannot enter his breast, much less the entanglements of profit and harm. Thus he regards an abyss as level ground and a capsized boat as an overturned cart. The myriad things may be displayed in profusion before his eyes, yet they cannot enter the dwelling of his mind; wherever he goes, he is amply at ease. Those whose inward reliance on the Dao is shallow are easily changed outwardly by external things. Thus one who throws with a tile is skillful; one who throws with a belt hook is afraid; one who throws with gold is dazed. Earlier Confucians held that throwing at one another to seize an object was called ‘kou’; it was probably a game such as drawing counters or throwing a belt hook. The heavier the object one strives for, the more tense and guarded the mind becomes. Hence with a tile one can display skill; with a hook fear arises; with gold one becomes dazed and confused. Fear is merely the fear of losing it; as for being dazed, it is as though one has already lost oneself. Therefore one who values external things binds his inner mind; when the mind is bound, it is tethered to something and cannot be at peace and self-content.

The commentator “Fan” says: In ancient times, those who rode upon Dao and De and wandered freely emptied themselves and had no entanglements; they removed distracting thoughts, so there was nothing in their minds. Guarding the spirit and dispelling distracting thoughts, they left external things no way to intrude; wherever they went, how could they fail to be at ease? Once the mind becomes guarded about something, how could it avoid the affliction of inner dullness and obstruction?

The sentence “Confucius viewed [the waterfall] at Lüliang” is a lead-in in the “Dasheng” chapter of the Zhuangzi. It describes how at Lüliang the water plunges from a height of thirty ren; the spray splashes in all directions and stretches far, so that even soft-shelled turtles, Chinese alligators, fish, and turtles cannot swim in it.

孔子观於吕梁。悬水三十仞,流沬三之乘道德以浮游者,虚己而无累,刳心而无物。涂却守神,物无自入焉,乌往而不暇耶?一有所矜,讵能无内拙之患? 孔子观於吕梁。悬水三十仞,流沬三十里,鼋鼉鱼鳖之所不能游也。见一丈夫游之,以为有苦而欲死者也,使弟子并流而承之。数百步而出,被发行歌,而游於塘下。孔子从而问之曰:吕梁悬水三十仞,流沬三十里,鼋鼉鱼鳖所不能游,向吾见子蹈之,以为有苦而欲死者,使弟子并流将承子。子出而被发行歌,吾以子为鬼也;察子,则人也。请问蹈水有道乎?曰:亡。吾无道。吾始乎故,长乎性,成乎命,与赍俱入,与汩偕出赍汩者,水回入涌出之貌。从水之道而不为私焉,此吾所以道之也。孔子曰:何谓始乎故,长乎性,成乎命也?曰:吾生於陵而安於陵,故也; 故犹素也,任其真素,则所遇而安也。 长於水而安於水,性也; 顺性之理,则物莫之逆:吾生於陵而安於陵,故也; 故犹素也,任其真素,则所遇而安也。 长於水而安於水,性也; 顺性之理,则物莫之逆也。 不知吾所以然而然,命也。 自然之理不可以智知,知其不可知,谓之命也。 卢曰:夫生於陵而安於使,生於水而安於水,习则为常,故曰始乎故也,长乎性也。习其故,安其性,忽然神会以成其命,得之不自知也。故《易》曰:穷理尽性,以至於命。命者,契乎神道也。
Interpretation

Confucius went to observe at Lüliang. There the waterfall plunged down from a height of thirty ren (an ancient unit of length, one ren being about eight chi), and the foam on the water could drift out for thirty li. Even great soft-shelled turtles, yuan and tuo (a kind of large reptile), and fish could not swim there. Confucius saw a man swimming in the rushing current and, thinking he was in difficulty and wanted to die, sent his disciples along the current to rescue him. The man swam several hundred paces and then came out of the water by himself, his hair loose, singing as he walked and strolling along the base of the embankment.

Confucius went up to him and asked: “The Lüliang waterfall is thirty ren high, and its foam drifts out thirty li; even yuan, tuo, fish, and soft-shelled turtles cannot swim there. Earlier I saw you jump into the water and thought you had some distress and wanted to die, so I sent my disciples to save you. When you came out with your hair loose and singing, I even took you for a ghost; only on closer look did I realize you were a man. May I ask whether there is any knack to swimming in the water?”

The man said: “There is no knack. My way is this: at first I followed my original plain nature (gu); I grew up in the water and followed my inborn nature (xing); in the end I was brought to completion by destiny (ming). I enter with the whirlpools and come out with the surging flow. I simply follow the patterns of the water and do not mix in any private intention—this is my method.”

Confucius asked: “What do you mean by beginning with gu, growing through xing, and being completed by ming?”

The man said: “I was born among hills and mounds, and I am at ease among hills and mounds—this is gu. I grew up in the water, and I am at ease in the water—this is xing. When one accords with the principle of one’s inborn nature, the myriad things do not oppose one. As for why I am like this, I myself cannot explain it—this is ming.”

Lu’s commentary says: To be born in a highland and be at ease in a highland, and once accustomed to water to make it one’s normal condition—therefore it says “beginning with gu” and “growing through xing.” Having become accustomed to one’s original condition and at ease in one’s inborn nature, one suddenly accords with the wondrous Dao, and thereby fulfills heavenly destiny, attaining it without being conscious of it. Therefore the Zhouyi says, “Exhausting principle and fully realizing one’s nature, one reaches destiny”; “ming” means according with the wondrous Dao.

Key points: This passage uses the story of swimming to discuss the cultivation ideal of “following nature and acting without intentional mind.” “Gu” refers to what is original and plain by habit; “xing” refers to inborn nature; “ming” refers to the spontaneous necessity that cannot be fully understood by human effort. The “water” in the text symbolizes the Dao: if a person walks with the Dao and does not add private intentions, then one can be like a fish in water, safe and at ease even in dangerous situations.

政和:鼋鼉鱼鳖之所不能游也而游之,则忘涉难之险者也。以子为鬼,察子,则人也,则亦疑乎神道也。 政和:鼋鼉鱼鳖之所不能游也而游之,则忘涉难之险者也。以子为鬼,察子,则人也,则亦疑於神矣。然求其为道,则从水之道不为私焉而已。与赍俱入者沈,以穷乎下,与汩俱出者浮,以摖乎上,任其自然而已。此所谓从水之道而不为私焉者也。生於陵而安於陵,不失其所因而已。长於水而安於水,不逆其所性而已。自然者,不累於外,不变於己,其所以然莫知为之者,故曰不知所以然而然,命也。 范曰:有所因而使然,故也。无所因而自然,性也。不知所以然而然,命也。吕梁大夫与赍俱入,与汨偕出,从水之道而不为私焉,乃能蹈乎鼋鼉鱼鳖之所不能游无所因而自然,性也。不知所以然而然,命也。吕梁大夫与赍俱入,与汨偕出,从水之道而不为私焉,乃能蹈乎鼋鼉鱼鳖之所不能游者。岂有所偏能而然耶?然则体道之人,固无往而不适矣。 仲尼适楚,出於林中,见痀偻者承蜩,犹掇之也。仲尼曰:子巧乎。有道耶?曰:我有道也。五六月,累垸二而不坠,则失道锱铢; 向秀曰:景二九而不坠,是用手之停审也,故承蜩所失者,不过锱铢之间耳。
Interpretation

One is the peril of Lüliang. Yuan (large softshell turtles), tuo (large aquatic animals of the Chinese alligator kind), fish, and turtles cannot swim in the rapids, yet a man could swim there because he had forgotten the danger of entering the water. Others therefore suspected he was a ghost or spirit, but on close observation he was still an ordinary person. His skill lay in complying with the nature of water and not mixing in private intentions: he sank with the descending current, rose with the whirlpools, and let nature take its course. This is “following the Dao of water without acting from private motives.” To be born in hills and mountains is to be at ease in hills and mountains and not go against the surroundings on which one depends; to grow up in water is to be at ease in water and not contravene one’s nature—that is all. What is called “naturalness” (ziran) means not being entangled by external things and not being altered by one’s own private intentions. No one can clearly explain the reason it is so, hence the saying “not knowing why it is so, yet it is so”; this is ming (fate).

Fan’s commentary explains: to be so because of something one relies on is “cause” (gu); to be naturally so without relying on anything is “nature” (xing); to be naturally so without knowing why is “fate” (ming). The man of Lüliang drifts up and down with the movement of the water and can swim where yuan, tuo, fish, and turtles cannot, not because he has any special ability, but because he can realize the great Dao and accord with the nature of water. From this it is clear that one who embodies the Dao can be peaceful and at ease wherever he goes.

Another is the hunchback catching cicadas. When Confucius went to Chu and came out of the woods, he saw a hunchbacked old man using a pole to catch cicadas, his movements as easy as picking something up. Confucius asked, “You are truly skillful—do you have some method?” The old man replied, “I do have a method.” He said: in the fifth and sixth months, if I stack two pellets on the tip of the pole without their falling, then my misses in catching cicadas are no more than a zīzhū—an extremely small unit of weight. Xiang Xiu’s commentary says: being able to stack two pellets without their dropping is because the hand is kept steady and one is careful; therefore errors in catching cicadas are only between zī and zhū.

累三而不坠,则失者十一;景五而不坠,犹掇之也。 用手转审,则无所失者也, 吾处之停审也,故承蜩所失者,不过锱铢之间耳。 累三而不坠,则失者十一;景五而不坠,犹掇之也。 用手转审,则无所失者也, 吾处也,若橛株驹, 崔撰曰:橛株驹,断树也。 吾执臂若槁木之枝。天地之大,万物之多,而唯蜩翼之知。吾不反不侧,不以万物易蜩之翼,何为而不得? 郭象曰:遗彼故得此也。 卢曰:言初学累丸也,未尝得之。习经半载,而能累二不坠矣。习之不已,乃至累五而不坠者,何耶?我身如橛株,臂如桔木,心一志定,都无异思,虽万物之多,而知在蜩异,何为而有不得耶? 孔子顾谓弟子曰:用志不分,乃凝於神。 分犹散,意专则与神相似者也。 其痀偻丈人之孔子顾谓弟子曰:用志不分,乃凝於神。 分犹散,意专则与神相似者也。 其痀偻丈人之谓乎。 卢曰:专心不维,乃凝於神会也。夫子以其未忘於蜩翼,故凝於神,非谓神会者也。 丈人曰:汝逢衣徒也,亦何知问是乎?修汝所以,而后载言其上。 修,治也。言治汝所用仁义之术,反於自然之道,然后可载此言於其身上也。

No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.

卢曰:言夫子之徒皆缝掖之士,用仁义以教化於天下,使天下纷然尚名利,役智虑,而荡失其真,劳其神明者,何知问此道耶?汝垂文字於后代者,复欲以言智之辩将吾此道载之於文字然。 政和:志者,致一之谓精。精於道者,无自而不可。其处?汝垂文字於后代者,复欲以言智之辩将吾此道载之於文字然。 政和:志者,致一之谓精。精於道者,无自而不可。其处身若橛株驹,其执臂若槁木之技,则寂然不动而忘吾有形,虽天地之大,万物之多,而唯蜩翼之知。不反不侧,不以万物易蜩之翼,则诚心不贰而外滑举消,其专弥久,其失弥少。故其始也,失者锱铢;及其久也,失者十一;又其久也,犹掇之也。此无他,志致一而已。志致一之谓精,惟天下之至精为能通,天下之至神。故曰用志不分,乃铢;及其久也,失者十一;又其久也,犹掇之也。此无他,志致一而已。志致一之谓精,惟天下之至精为能通,天下之至神。故曰用志不分,乃凝於神。 范曰:承蜩,末技也。用志不分,乃造於凝神之妙。然则向之所谓纯气之守者,其用志不分,从可知矣。 海上之人有好沤鸟者,每旦之海上,从沤鸟游,沤鸟之至者百住而不止。 心和而形顺者,物所不恶。住当作数。
Interpretation

Lu (the commentator) says: This is ridiculing the Confucian scholars. Those scholars in broad-sleeved long robes who teach the world with benevolence and righteousness make people everywhere scramble after fame and profit and labor their cleverness and calculations; they lose their original true nature and exhaust their spirit—how could they understand this great Dao (the Way)? You leave writings to later generations and again wish, by clever disputation of words, to write my great Dao into words; this cannot be done.

Zhenghe (the commentator) says: “Will” means singleness of mind; when concentrated to the utmost, it is Jing (essence). One who penetrates the great Dao has nothing he cannot accomplish.

The following cites the “catching cicadas” (cheng tiao) story from Zhuangzi, “Dasheng.” When the hunchbacked old man catches cicadas, his body is as steady as a tree stump and his arm as rigid as withered wood; he is silent and motionless, forgetting even his own body. Though heaven and earth are vast and the myriad things numerous, in his eyes there is only the cicada’s wing. He does not turn his head or glance sideways, and does not let external things divert his attention from the cicada’s wing; when the mind is single, external disturbances disappear. The longer he concentrates, the fewer his errors. At first his errors are only a tiny fraction (zizhu); after a long time they fall to one in ten; after still longer, catching them is as easy as picking something up. There is no other reason for this—only singleness of mind. Singleness of mind is Jing; only the purest person under heaven can penetrate the wondrous subtlety of the world. Thus it says, “When the will is not divided, it then coalesces into Shen (spirit),” meaning that when the mind is not scattered, the spirit can concentrate.

Fan (the commentator) says: Catching cicadas is only a minor skill, yet if the will is not divided one can reach the wondrous state of concentrated Shen. From this one may infer that the previously mentioned “guarding the pure Qi (vital energy)”—single-mindedly preserving primal Qi—also has the principle of undivided will.

The following passage tells of the man by the sea and the gulls: There was a man by the seashore who liked to play with gulls. Every morning he went to the shore and frolicked with the gulls. The gulls that came numbered in the hundreds and thousands, and they came continuously. The commentary holds that the character zhu in “bai zhu” should be shu, meaning gathering in flocks and assembling repeatedly.

The final sentence means: one whose mind is peaceful and whose form is gentle and compliant—even birds and beasts do not dislike him.

其父曰:吾闻沤鸟皆从汝游,汝取来吾玩之。明日之海上,沤鸟舞而不下也。 心动於内,形变於外而形顺者,物所不恶。住当作数。 其父曰:吾闻沤鸟皆从汝游,汝取来吾玩之。明日之海上,沤鸟舞而不下也。 心动於内,形变於外,禽鸟犹觉,人理岂可诈哉? 故曰至言去言,至为无为,齐智之所知,则浅矣。 言为都忘,然后物无疑心。限於智之所知,则失之远矣。或有疑丈人假伪形以获蝉,海童任和心而鸥游,二情相背,而童不忤物。夫立言之本,各有伙趣,似若乖互会归不异者,盖丈人明夫心虑专一,犹能外不骇物,况自然冥至,形同於木石者乎?至於海童,诚心充於内,坦荡形外,虽未能利害两忘,猜忌兼消,然轻群异类,亦无所能外不骇物,况自然冥至,形同於木石者乎?至於海童,诚心充於内,坦荡形外,虽未能利害两忘,猜忌兼消,然轻群异类,亦无所多怪。此二喻者,盖假近以征远,借末以明本耳。 卢曰:夫神会,可以理通非以情知。知生则骨肉所猜,理生则万类无间,然后知审精微也。同万物者,在於神会;同群有者,在於情灭。欲独矜其心智,则去道远矣。
Interpretation

By the sea there was a youth who played every day with the seagulls (ou birds). His father said, “I hear the seagulls all play with you—catch one and bring it to me to play with.” The next day, when the youth went to the seaside, the seagulls circled in the air and would not come down again.

When the mind is stirred, the outer form changes accordingly; but if the form accords with nature, external things will not be averse to it. (As for the word zhu, “to stay or land,” one commentator holds that it should be understood as the word shu, “counting,” referring to calculation and a scheming mind.)

The father said the same thing again, and then another layer of meaning follows: once the mind moves, the outer form changes with it, and even birds can perceive it—how could human scheming be used to deceive?

Therefore it is said: the highest speech is speechlessness, and the highest action is Wuwei (non-action). Whatever can be understood by worldly cleverness is shallow in its level.

Only when words and actions are both forgotten do external things cease to be suspicious. To be limited by cleverness is to grow ever farther from the Dao.

Someone may wonder: the hunchbacked old man (the “old man” refers to the old man in the “Dasheng” chapter of the Zhuangzi who catches cicadas with a focused, motionless posture) adopts a deliberately contrived posture to catch cicadas, while the sea child (the seaside youth) lets his original mind roam and play with the seagulls. The two seem opposed, yet the sea child did not alarm external things. The fundamental purport of each formulation differs; on the surface they seem to contradict each other, but their final destination is no different. It is probably because the old man understood the concentration of the mind and could still keep external things undisturbed—how much more those who are profoundly united with nature and whose forms are like wood and stone?

As for the sea child, sincerity fills him within and openness shows without. Although he has not yet reached the point of forgetting both benefit and harm and eliminating all suspicion, he does not distinguish his own kind from other kinds, and so the seagulls do not become wary of him. Both similes use nearby things to verify a distant principle and use branch details to explain the root.

Lü Chongxuan (a Tang-dynasty Daoist and one of the commentators on this book) says: When spiritual consciousness is in mutual accord, one may communicate through rational principle, but one cannot know through emotion. If one knows through emotion, then even flesh-and-blood kin will grow suspicious of one another; if one communicates through rational principle, then there is no barrier among the myriad things, and only thus can one apprehend the subtle principle. To be one with the myriad things lies in the mutual accord of spiritual consciousness; to be of the same company as sentient beings lies in the melting away of emotion. To wish to boast of one’s own mind alone is to be far from the Great Dao.

政和:古之有道者,去智忘机,纯白内备,故入兽不乱群,入鸟不乱行,鸟兽不恶,而况人乎?盖内本无心,物自情灭。欲独矜其心智,则去道远矣。 政和:古之有道者,去智忘机,纯白内备,故入兽不乱群,入鸟不乱行,鸟兽不恶,而况人乎?盖内本无心,物自不疑故也。纯白不全,则机变之智多,於是有高飞以避罾弋之害。然则沤鸟之舞而不下,盖以向也去智而今任智故也。圣人不以智治国。其有言也,无言之之累;其有为也,无为之之迹。齐智之所知,则浅矣。 范曰:沤,海鸟也。出没若沤。夫机心存於胸中,则海上之沤徒舞而不下,况於人乎?涉世之圣人,至言去言,虽言而未尝言;至为无为鸟也。出没若沤。夫机心存於胸中,则海上之沤徒舞而不下,况於人乎?涉世之圣人,至言去言,虽言而未尝言;至为无为。虽为而未尝为,猜虑不萌,纯白大备,入鸟不乱行,孰有舞而不下者?一将齐其智之所知,则言有当愆为有成亏,曾未免夫累,乌能深造乎道?
Interpretation

Those in ancient times who understood the Great Dao set aside a cunning and deceitful mind and forgot calculating, opportunistic thoughts, keeping their inner hearts pure and unadorned. Thus when they entered among wild beasts, the herds were not startled or thrown into confusion; when they flew into flocks of birds, the flocks did not break formation. Even birds and beasts held no guard against them—how much less would human beings? This was because their hearts originally held no calculating mind, and so outer things naturally did not suspect them.

Once the nature of purity and truth suffers deficiency, clever and calculating intelligence multiplies; birds therefore learn to fly high to avoid the harm of bird nets (zeng) and corded arrows (yi). The ou birds on the sea—a kind of seabird that comes and goes like bubbles on water—only circled and danced in the air and would not come down to land, precisely because a calculating mind had already arisen in their hearts. The sage does not govern the world by relying on cleverness and intelligence: when he speaks, he leaves no trace of words; when he acts, he leaves no trace of artificial contrivance. If one relies only on one's own wisdom to discriminate among all things, one's insight becomes shallow and thin, and one departs far from the Great Dao.

赵襄子率徒十万,狩於中山,大畋曰狩。藉C燔林,扇赫百里。有一人从石壁中出,随烟烬上下。众谓鬼物。火过,徐行而出,若无所经涉者。襄子怪而留之,徐而察之;形色七窍,人也;气息音声,人也。问奚道而处石?奚道而人火?其人曰:奚物而谓石?奚物而谓火而察之;形色七窍,人也;气息音声,人也。问奚道而处石?奚道而人火?其人曰:奚物而谓石?奚物而谓火? 此则都不觉有石火,何物而能阂之。 襄子曰:而向之所出者,石也;而向之所涉者,火也。其人曰:不知也。 不知之极,故得如此。 魏文侯闻之,问子夏曰:彼何人哉?子夏曰:以商所闻夫子之言,和者大同於物,物无得伤阂者,游金石,蹈水火,皆可也。文侯曰:吾子奚不为之?子夏曰:刳心去智,商未之能。虽然,试语之有暇矣。 夫因心以刳心,借智以去智,心智之累诚尽,然所遣心智之迹犹存心去智,商未之能。虽然,试语之有暇矣。 夫因心以刳心,借智以去智,心智之累诚尽,然所遣心智之迹犹存。明夫至理非用心之所体忘,言之则有余暇矣。
Interpretation

Zhao Xiangzi led a hundred thousand soldiers on a hunt in Zhongshan and set fire to the forest; the flames spread for over a hundred li. Suddenly a man walked out from a stone wall, moving up and down amid the smoke and dust. Everyone thought he was a ghost or monster. After the great fire passed, he walked out slowly, as if he had experienced nothing at all. Xiangzi found this strange and kept him there to observe him closely: his outer form, complexion, and seven apertures were no different from those of ordinary people, and his breathing and the sound of his speech were human. Xiangzi asked him how he lived inside the stone and how he walked into the fire. The man asked in return: What is stone? What is fire? He said that he was not aware of stone and fire at all—how then could they obstruct him? Xiangzi said, “The place you just came out of was a stone wall; the place you just passed through was a great fire.” The man said, “I do not know.”

This “not knowing” of external things reached its utmost, and only thus could he do this.

When Marquis Wen of Wei heard of this, he asked Zixia, “What sort of person is this?” Zixia said, “I have heard the Master (Confucius) say that one whose heart is inwardly harmonious and yielding can merge with the ten thousand things, and no thing can harm or obstruct him. He can pass through metal and stone and tread over water and fire—all this is possible.” The Marquis asked, “Why do you not go and attain this?” Zixia said, “To eliminate mental activity and cast away cleverness—I am not yet able to do that. However, if you have leisure, I can explain the principle to you.”

(Note: “Hollowing out the heart and discarding wisdom” (kuxin quzhi) is a Daoist cultivation ideal; it refers to removing discriminatory thoughts and cunning from the mind, which is what the Zhuangzi calls the “Fasting of the Mind” (Xinzhai).)

The meaning of this passage is: using mental activity to eliminate mental activity, using cleverness to discard cleverness—the entanglements of mind and intellect have indeed been exhausted, but the trace of having discarded mind and intellect still remains. From this it can be known that the highest principle is not to be realized by the mind or attained through forgetting; if one is to explain it clearly, there is still much that can be said.

卢曰:前章言游水之不碍,此章明火石之不伤。言人之习水者多,蹈火者少,恐物情之偏执也,故复言火以辩之。其内忘己形,外忘於物,不知石之所以碍,火之所以伤。文侯不晓而兴问,子夏素知而善答,故文侯重质子既能知者,何不为之耶? 子夏曰:我但知而说之,则有余也。若行而证之者,商则未知之能。 文侯曰:夫子奚不为之?子夏曰:夫子能之而能不为者也。文侯大说。 天下有能之而能不为者,有能之而不能不为者,有不能而强欲为之者,有不为而自能不为之?子夏曰:夫子能之而能不为者也。文侯大说。
Interpretation

Lu Chongxuan’s commentary says: The previous chapter speaks of people swimming in water without being obstructed; this chapter speaks of people treading on burning stones without being burned. Many in the world learn to swim, but few dare to tread on fire. This is because people’s understanding is easily biased, so fire is used again to clarify the principle. Those who cultivate the Dao forget their own bodies within and forget all things without; therefore they do not think about why stones obstruct or why fire burns. Marquis Wen of Wei did not understand this principle, so he asked. Zixia had ordinarily understood these principles, and so he answered well. Marquis Wen then pressed him: “Since you, sir, can do it, why do you not do it?”

Zixia said: “I merely understand it and can speak about it; that is already sufficient. If I were to practice and verify it personally, I could not yet do so.”

Marquis Wen asked: “Why do you not do it, sir?” Zixia said: “The Master is one who can do it but chooses not to.” Marquis Wen was very pleased to hear this.

Then Marquis Wen raised another set of questions: “In the world, are there those who can do it but can refrain from doing it, those who can do it but cannot refrain from doing it, those who cannot do it but insist on doing it, and those who do not do it and yet naturally can refrain from doing it?” Zixia still answered: “The Master is one who can do it but chooses not to.” Marquis Wen was greatly delighted again.

天下有能之而能不为者,有能之而不能不为者,有不能而强欲为之者,有不为而自能者。至於圣人,亦何所为,亦何所不为?亦何所能,亦何所不能?俛仰同俗,升降随物,奇功异迹,未尝暂显,体中之绝妙处,万不视一焉。此卷自始篇至此章,明顺性命之道,不系着五情,专志政柔,诚心无二者,则处水火而不焦溺,涉木石而不挂碍,触锋刃而无伤残,履危险而无颠坠;万物靡逆其心,入兽不乱群;神能独游,身能轻举,耳可洞听,目可彻照。斯言不经,实骇常心。故试论之:夫阴阳递化,五才遍育。金土以母子相生,水火以燥湿相乘,人性以静躁殊途,升降以所能异情。故有云飞之翰,渊潜之鳞,火游之鼠,木藏之虫。何者?刚柔炎凉,各有攸宜,安於一域,则困於余方。至於至人,心与元气玄合,体与之鳞,火游之鼠,木藏之虫。何者?刚柔炎凉,各有攸宜,安於一域,则困於余方。至於至人,心与元气玄合,体与阴阳冥谐,方圆不当於一象,温凉不值於一器,神定气和,所乘皆顺,则五物不能逆,寒暑不能伤。谓含德之厚,和之至也。故常无死地,岂用心去就而复全哉?蹈水火,乘云雾,履高危,入甲兵,未足怪也。 卢曰:言夫子能而不为者,方以仁义礼节、君臣之道以救衰俗耳。不独善其身以群鸟兽焉。
Interpretation

In the world, some people can do something but do not do it; some can do it but, unable to act otherwise, must do it; some cannot do it yet force themselves to do it; and some do not deliberately act, yet succeed naturally. As for sages, what they do and do not do, what they can and cannot do, all accord with nature. They follow the world in its ups and downs, rising or falling with things, and never deliberately display wondrous powers or extraordinary signs; the most mysterious part of their body and mind they do not reveal even one part in ten thousand.

From the opening of this scroll to this point, what is expounded is the principle of according with heavenly nature and the pattern of life: not to be entangled by emotions such as joy, anger, sorrow, and pleasure; to be single-minded and yielding; to be sincere in heart without duplicity. Such a person can stand in water and fire without being drowned or burned, pass through grass, trees, mountains, and rocks without obstruction, encounter blades without injury, and walk through dangerous places without falling. The myriad things do not oppose his will, and when he enters a herd of beasts he does not disturb them. His Shen (spirit) can roam alone, his body can rise lightly, his ears can hear distant sounds, and his eyes can see through dark places. These statements seem contrary to common sense and are truly astonishing.

Let me therefore attempt to discuss it: Yin-Yang alternate and transform, and the Five Phases (the Five Powers) generate and nourish one another. Metal and Earth stand in the mother-child relation of mutual generation, while Water and Fire check one another through dryness and dampness. Human nature has both stillness and agitation, each following its own course; in rising and descending, conditions differ according to each one’s capacity. Thus some birds can soar high in the clouds, some fish can lurk in the deep, some rats can frolic in fire, and some insects can hide within wood. Why? Because cold, heat, dryness, and dampness each have their proper suitability; if one only settles securely in one place, one will be trapped in other environments.

As for the Perfected Person (zhiren), his mind joins with primordial Qi—the original vital energy at the very beginning of the generation of heaven, earth, and the myriad things—and his body is in harmonious communication with Yin-Yang. He does not correspond only to one shape, nor does he adapt only to one temperature. With Shen (spirit) settled and breath harmonious, wherever he dwells all is favorable; thus none of the various external things can oppose him, and cold and heat cannot harm him. This is called containing profound De (Virtue/Power; hande), reaching the utmost of harmony. Laozi says, “always without a place of death.” Could it be that this is preserved only by deliberately choosing and rejecting, advancing and retreating? Therefore stepping into water and fire, riding clouds and mist, climbing high and perilous places, and entering military formations—none of these is worth marveling at.

Lu Chongxuan (a Tang-dynasty Daoist commentator) says: This means that Confucius (the Master) had the capacity but did not put it into practice; he wished to use benevolence, righteousness, ritual propriety, and the way of ruler and minister to rescue the declining customs of the age, and not merely to cultivate himself alone and keep company with birds and beasts.

政和:心与道冥则一体,未始有分,形与物迁,则万化末始不异。物我相对,触类为二,和之以天倪,乌用而求有以异?物我同根,彼是一致,无虚实之相形,则出入石壁,始有分,形与物迁,则万化末始不异。物我相对,触类为二,和之以天倪,乌用而求有以异?物我同根,彼是一致,无虚实之相形,则出入石壁,奚物而能阂?无利害相摩,则上下烟烬,奚物而能伤?故曰和者,大同於物,物无得伤。阂者,游金石,蹈水火,皆可也。子夏知之而未能,夫子能之而不为,盖道非有心者所能得远,亦非无心者所能得近。故子夏於此则曰刳心去智,商未之能。圣人藏於天而不自衒鬻,则夫子能之而不为者,真是也。彼弊弊然游金石,蹈水火,以为有道,是以其道与世抗,使人得而相之者尔。故《列子》历叔诸子之道,至此则尊夫子为大全焉。
Interpretation

When the mind aligns with the Dao (the Way) and becomes one with it, there is no longer any distinction between self and other; when the body transforms along with the myriad things, the countless changes are no different from the Dao. When things and I stand in mutual opposition, contact with things gives rise to duality. If one harmonizes this through natural boundaries (tianni: the principle of nature), why seek distinctions elsewhere? Things and I arise from the same root; other and self return to unity. With no opposition between empty and solid, one can enter and emerge from stone walls without obstruction; with no friction between benefit and harm, the smoke, fire, and ashes above and below cannot injure him. Therefore it is said that the person of harmony is greatly one with the myriad things, and the myriad things cannot harm him. What is called “without obstruction” means being able to roam amid metal and stone and tread upon water and fire.

Zixia (Bu Shang, a disciple of Confucius) understood this principle but was unable to put it into practice; Confucius was able to do it but did not do it. This is probably because the Dao is not something that people with cunning minds can easily attain, nor is it something that people without deliberate mind can quickly approach. Thus Zixia spoke of “cutting away cunning and discarding cleverness,” yet he himself had not yet done so. The sage hides the Dao within naturalness and does not display himself; therefore Confucius’s being able to do it but not doing it is precisely true attainment of the Dao. Those who laboriously roam among metal and stone and tread upon water and fire, believing themselves to possess the Dao—their Dao sets itself against the ordinary world and merely gives people something to compare. Therefore, when the Liezi recounts the ways of the various schools, at this point it exalts Confucius as the most complete and comprehensive synthesizer.

The meaning of Fan’s surviving sentence is: stone is hard, and so it can become an obstacle; fire is fierce, and so it can injure people. If one clings to such external things, one’s Dao will set itself against the ordinary world and merely allow people to compare it.

范曰:石则实而能碍,火则烈而以其道与世抗,使人得而相之者尔。故《列子》历叔诸子之道,至此则尊夫子为大全焉。 范曰:石则实而能碍,火则烈而善焚。触实不碍者,虽从石壁中出,不知其为石;蹈火不热者,虽随烟烬上下,不知其为火。坐进此道,唯和而同物,然后能之。盖大同离人,万物一视,以游金石,以蹈水火,无往不可。将以刳心,未能虚而无物;将以去智,未能同於大通,故虽语之有暇,而未之能为焉。夫子能之而能不为,是殆得之以心者然耶。 有神巫自齐来处於郑,命曰季咸,知人死生、存亡、祸福、寿夭,期以岁月旬日,如神。郑人见之,皆避而走。 向秀曰:不喜自闻死日也。 列子见之而心醉, 向秀曰:迷惑其道也。 而归以告壶丘子,曰:始吾以夫子之道为至矣,则又有至而走。 向秀曰:不喜自闻死日也。 列子见之而心醉, 向秀曰:迷惑其道也。 而归以告壶丘子,曰:始吾以夫子之道为至矣,则又有至焉者矣。 郭象曰;谓季咸之至又过於夫子也。 壶子曰:吾与汝既其文,未既其实,而固得道与?众雌而无雄,而又奚卵焉? 向秀曰:夫实由文显,道以事彰,有道而无事,犹有雌无雄耳。今吾与汝虽深浅不同,然俱在实位,则无文相发矣。故未尽我道之实也。此言至人之唱,必有感而后和者也。 而以道与世抗,必信矣。夫故使人得而相汝。
Interpretation

The commentator Master Fan says: Stone is solid and can obstruct; fire is fierce and skilled at burning. If one can touch solid things without any obstruction, then even when passing out through a stone wall one does not regard it as stone; if one can step into fire without feeling its heat, then even when tossed up and down with smoke and ashes one does not regard it as fire. To cultivate this Dao and sit upright in meditative absorption, one must be in harmony and unity with all things before one can do so. Broadly speaking, only by transcending the turmoil of the human world and viewing all things as one can one pass through metal and stone, tread on water and fire, and be unobstructed wherever one goes. If one merely wants to cut away the miscellaneous thoughts in the mind but fails to attain emptiness and the absence of things; if one merely wants to remove cunning intelligence but fails to unite with the Dao of Great Penetration—then although one hears others explain it, one still cannot truly do it. Liezi could do it but did not consider himself able; presumably he had something attained in his heart and was naturally so.

In the state of Zheng there was a spirit shaman who came from the state of Qi and settled in Zheng. His name was Ji Xian (a shaman famous for divination and prophecy). He could calculate a person’s life and death, survival and ruin, misfortune and blessing, and lifespan, precisely to the year and month and even to the ten-day period, like a god. When the people of Zheng saw him, they all avoided him for fear of not getting away in time.

Xiang Xiu (a Wei-Jin Xuanxue commentator) notes: This is because people do not wish to hear the date of their death.

When Liezi saw Ji Xian, he was entranced. Xiang Xiu notes: This means he was deluded by his technique and lost the true Dao. Liezi went back and told his teacher Huqiu Zi (that is, Hu Zi, Liezi’s master), saying: At first I thought the Master’s Dao was already the highest, but now I have seen something even higher. Guo Xiang (a commentator) notes: This says that Ji Xian’s Dao had surpassed the Master’s.

Hu Zi said: What you and I have obtained is only the outward form of the Dao; we have not yet obtained its substance. How can you say you have attained the Dao? If there is only a female bird and no male bird, how can eggs be produced?

Xiang Xiu notes: Substance is made manifest through outward form, and the Dao is made clear through affairs. To have the Dao but no affairs is like having only the female and no male. Now you and I, though differing in depth, both stand in the position of substance, and so there is no outward form by which we may illuminate each other; therefore I have not yet fully revealed the substance of my Dao. This means that when the utmost person initiates something, there must be a stimulus before there is a response.

If one wishes to use the Dao to contend with the mundane world, one must be truly sincere and substantial; only then can one let others perceive one’s condition.

向秀曰;无其一方以必信於世,。此言至人之唱,必有感而后和者也。 而以道与世抗,必信矣。夫故使人得而相汝。 向秀曰;无其一方以必信於世,故可得而相也。 卢曰:列子见郑巫而心醉,以其能知生死、祸福,将以道尽於此。壶丘子曰:吾与汝且亡其文迹,都未尽其实理也,汝岂得吾道欤?夫澄神寂虑如众雌也,动用成功若雄也,汝方息事以静心,安得无雄而求卵耶?乃欲以至道与俗巫相敌,则汝之深信故鬼物知汝也。 政和解见:《庄子》书
Interpretation

Xiang Xiu’s Commentary: If a person has no fixed, unchanging way of acting that is sufficient to inspire trust in the world, others can only infer from his outward appearance and “read his face” for him. This means that what the Perfected Person (zhiren, one who has cultivated the Dao to an extremely high level) advocates must await stimulation by external things before anyone responds.

If one sets the Dao in opposition to the ordinary world and establishes a separate school, it becomes easier for people to believe, and so they can discern the details from his words and deeds.

Lu (Lu Chongxuan)’s Commentary: Liezi (a Daoist figure of the Warring States period, after whom the book Liezi is named) saw the shaman of Zheng, Jixian (who could calculate a person’s life and death, fortune and misfortune), and his mind was mesmerized by him, believing that the entire mystery of the great Dao lay in such predictions.

Huqiu Zi’s (Liezi’s teacher’s) criticism: You and I have not even grasped the outer traces (wenji) of the great Dao, let alone its true principle—how could you obtain my Dao? To clarify and quiet the spirit, utterly still and free of anxious thought, is like having only the female without the male; to act in affairs and achieve results is like the male. Now you stop your affairs to quiet your mind, yet you wish to obtain eggs without borrowing the male—how could that be possible? You even wish to take the supreme Dao and contend with a vulgar shaman; then you are too attached to belief, and instead you let ghostly beings (here referring to the ghosts and spirits on which shamanic arts rely) see through you.

“The Zhenghe Explanation Is Found in the Zhuangzi”: This entry notes the source; the relevant explanation is found in the Zhuangzi. See the story in the Zhuangzi, “Ying Diwang,” in which Jixian physiognomizes Liezi.

范曰:神也者,妙万物而为言,巫则诬神之言以告人者。故死生、存亡、祸福、寿夭,虽可期於岁月旬日之间,似妙而非妙,如神而已。既已谓之神巫,而又曰季咸,以寓物之妙而有感者也。咸则有感,感则有心,方且以我之有心而感人之心,以我之有见而见人之见,故死生、存亡、祸福、寿夭,八者妄名。起名既已妄,又妄见之,见则有心,方且以我之有心而感人之心,以我之有见而见人之见,故死生、存亡、祸福、寿夭,八者妄名。起名既已妄,又妄见之,见既愈妄,又妄言之,世之滞於相而不能冥妄者,又妄受之,直以是为真,故弃而走也。虽列子由见之而心醉,未能制心也,以其道之至於壶丘子,未能绝学也。是直既其文,未既其实而已。夫道未始有物,而物无非道,故空虚无而莫之与匹,犹之众雌而无雄也。苟居然独而藏於胸中,是由无雄而卵也。而以道与世抗而必信焉,未能立乎不测而游乎无有,故使人得而相汝。 尝试与来,以予示之。明日,列子与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:嘻,子之先生死矣,弗活矣立乎不测而游乎无有,故使人得而相汝。
Interpretation

Master Fan holds that “Shen” (spirit) is the power that enables the myriad things to display their mystery, while “wu” (shaman) is one who falsely relies on the will of Shen to transmit messages to people. Death and life, survival and destruction, misfortune and blessing, longevity and early death—even if these can be calculated within a few months or a few tens of days, they only appear mysterious; they do not count as true divine wonder. Since he was called a “spirit-shaman” (shenwu) and also named Ji Xian (a spirit-shaman in the Liezi), this shows that he merely borrowed the wonder of external things in order to produce responses.

Once Ji Xian had such responses, he had mental intentions. He used his own mind to stir the minds of others, and his own views to peer into the views of others; thus death and life, survival and destruction, misfortune and blessing, longevity and early death—these eight matters—all became empty and false labels. Since the labels were already false, he recklessly added what he saw and recklessly added what he said, while people in the world clung to appearances and could not transcend the false, and blindly believed and accepted them, taking them as real. That is why, when Liezi saw him, he abandoned his teacher and left.

When Liezi saw Ji Xian, he was intoxicated and entranced, which shows that he had not yet subdued his own mind. He had obtained Huqiu Zi’s Dao, but had not yet cut off his attachment to learning. This is only to have obtained the words of Dao, not yet to have obtained its substance.

Dao originally has no concrete form, yet none of the myriad things is not a manifestation of Dao. Dao is “empty and void,” and no thing can match it—like having only the female and no male. If one alone guards a little attainment and hides it in one’s breast, it is like having no male yet vainly laying eggs: in the end nothing can be accomplished. If one wishes to use Dao to contend with the world and yet clings to this, one cannot stand in the unfathomable place or roam in the realm of nonbeing, and thus allows others to see through to one’s depths.

The following passage says: Hu Zi (Liezi’s teacher) said, “Try bringing Ji Xian here and let me show him.” The next day, Liezi brought Ji Xian to see Hu Zi. After Ji Xian came out, he said to Liezi, “Alas, your master is about to die; he will not live…”

尝试与来,以予示之。明日,列子与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:嘻,子之先生死矣,弗活矣,不可以旬数矣。吾见怪焉,见湿灰焉。列子入,涕泣沾衾,以告壶子。壶子。曰:向吾示之以地文, 向秀曰:块然若土也。 罪乎不震不止,罪字或作萌。 向秀曰:萌然不动,亦不自止,与枯木同其不华,死灰均其寂魄,此至人无感之时也。夫至人其动也。天,其静也地,其行也水流,其湛也渊嘿。渊嘿之与水流,天行之与地止,其於不为而自然一也。今季咸见其尸居而坐忘,即谓之将死,见其神动而天随,便为之有生。苟无心而应感,则与变升降,以世为量,然后足为物主而顺时无极耳,岂相者之所觉哉。 是殆见吾杜德几也。 向秀曰:德几不发,故曰杜也。 卢曰:夫鬼神之灵能知人之动用之心耳。有所系,鬼便知也为物主而顺时无极耳,岂相者之所觉哉。 是殆见吾杜德几也。 向秀曰:德几不发,故曰杜也。 卢曰:夫鬼神之灵能知人之动用之心耳。有所系,鬼便知也。壶子色存乎湿灰,心着乎土壤,萌然无虑,故曰天文。振动则为生,止静则冥寂,故曰不动不止也。
Interpretation

Liezi once tried to bring Jixian to read Huzi’s physiognomy. The next day, Liezi and Jixian went together to see Huzi. After Jixian came out, he said to Liezi: “Alas, your master is about to die; he cannot live. Within ten days. I saw a strange appearance, deathly still like wet ashes.” After Liezi went inside, he wept until tears soaked his clothes and bedding, and told Huzi what had been said. Huzi said: “What I showed him just now was the ‘Earthly Pattern’ (a state as silent and motionless as the earth, showing no sign of vitality).”

Xiang Xiu comments: (Huzi) remained alone in a lumpish inertness, like a heap of earth.

“Zui hu, bu zhen bu zhi”—“Guilt/crime?—neither shaken nor stopped” (in some editions the word zui, “guilt/crime,” is written meng, “sprout”):

Xiang Xiu comments: It sprouts and stirs but does not move, nor does it stop of itself. Like a withered tree, it does not blossom; like dead ashes, it is silent and without soul. This is the time when the perfected person (one whose cultivation has reached its utmost) has no response to things. When the perfected person moves, he is like the movement of Heaven; when still, like the stillness of Earth; when flowing, like water; when deep, like an abyss. The silence of the abyss and the flow of water, the movement of Heaven and the stillness of Earth, are one in “not acting yet being naturally so.” Now Jixian saw Huzi sitting quietly like a corpse, having forgotten himself, and said he was going to die; when he saw Huzi’s spirit active and complying with the changes of the heavenly Dao, he said he had vitality. If one can respond to things without a mind of one’s own, rise and fall with transformation, and take the affairs of the world as the measure, only then can one become the master of the myriad things, comply with the times and circumstances, and change without end. How could a physiognomist detect this?

“He has probably seen only my blocking of the incipient mechanism of De.” (Huzi said:) Jixian probably saw only that I had closed off the sprouting mechanism of De.

Xiang Xiu comments: The sprouting movement of De had not yet appeared, and so it is called “blocking” (closing and storing).

Lu’s commentary: The numinous efficacy of ghosts and spirits can only perceive a person’s stirring thoughts and mental intentions. When the human mind is attached to something, ghosts and spirits can know it. Huzi’s facial color was like wet ashes, his mind like soil, sprouting without anxious thought; therefore it is called the “Heavenly Pattern” (here referring to the still state described above). Vibration is vitality; cessation and stillness are profound quiescence; therefore it is said, “not moving, not stopping.”

政和:见怪则非常,湿灰则不复然,古之至人,运道枢於无穷,则彼是莫得其偶。杜德几而不发,则嗒焉似丧其耦,故示之以地文。而见吾杜德几,则谓弗活也。地与阴同德,而其事文则一以为静,一以为显,故曰不震不止。不震,言不震动也;不止,言不止着也。 范曰阴同德,而其事文则一以为静,一以为显,故曰不震不止。不震,言不震动也;不止,言不止着也。 范曰:凡形,皆土也。有形矣,乃有可怪。有心矣,乃以为怪。土合於空,心合於无,道通为一,孰可为怪?古之至人,心若死灰,其藏深矣,不可测究,彼将以妄见而见焉,故直以为见怪也。不震,以言其未尝动;不止,以言其未尝止。萌乎不震不止者,示之以地.文,固如此也。是殆见其杜德几而不发者欤? 尝又与来。明日,又与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:幸矣,子之先生遇我也,有瘳矣。灰然灰或作全。有生矣,吾见杜权矣。 有用而无利,故谓之杜权。 列子入告壶子。壶子曰:向吾示之出而谓列子曰:幸矣,子之先生遇我也,有瘳矣。灰然灰或作全。有生矣,吾见杜权矣。 有用而无利,故谓之杜权。 列子入告壶子。壶子曰:向吾示之以天壤, 向秀曰:天壤之中,覆载之功见矣。此地之文,不犹外乎? 名实不入,
Interpretation

This passage comes from the story "Ji Xian Physiognomizes Hu Zi" in the "Huangdi" chapter of the Liezi. The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing is the Liezi; here the commentaries of Zhenghe, the Fan family, and Xiang Xiu are cited.

Zhenghe Commentary: On seeing a strange or uncanny phenomenon, one regards it as extraordinary; but such a person is already like wet ashes, no longer burning and having lost his dynamic vitality. The perfected persons of antiquity could set the Great Dao in motion without end, so that opposites had no way to match up with one another. They withdrew the De-mechanism (the inner vital dynamism of life) and did not send it outward; outwardly they were blank and still, as if they had lost their spouse. Therefore he had to show the other person the "Earth Pattern" (the image of earth-like silence and weightiness). When the other saw him withdrawing the De-mechanism, he assumed that he was about to die. Earth shares the same De as Yin and softness; the manifestation of its function is, on the one hand, stillness, and on the other, appearing and revealing. Hence it says "not shaking, not staying fixed." "Not shaking" means not moving; "not staying fixed" means not lingering in any one place.

Fan Commentary: Whatever has form belongs to earth. Only when there is form do things that can be considered strange arise; only when there is mind-consciousness does one take them as strange. Earth merges with emptiness, mind merges with the signless, and the Dao penetrates as one—where could anything strange remain? The minds of the perfected persons of antiquity were like dead ashes, and their inner depths were profound and unfathomable. The other looked with deluded perception and therefore thought he saw something strange. "Not shaking" shows that he never moved; "not staying fixed" shows that he never halted in one place. The "Earth Pattern" that displays "not shaking and not staying fixed" was originally just like this. This was probably seeing Hu Zi withdraw the De-mechanism and not allow it to issue outward, was it not?

The gist of the original text: Liezi again returned with Ji Xian, and the next day went to see Hu Zi again. Ji Xian came out and said to Liezi: "Your master has met me and is saved! Within his death-ash-like countenance there was unexpectedly vitality—I saw 'Du Quan.'"

The commentary explains that Du Quan refers to vitality being withdrawn and hidden, not yet manifest. It has its use, but its benefit is not seen; therefore it is called Du Quan.

Liezi went back and told this to Hu Zi. Hu Zi said: "Just now what I showed him was the image of Tianrang (Heaven and Earth, vast and boundless)..."

Xiang Xiu's Commentary: Within Tianrang, the function of covering and supporting the myriad things has already appeared. Is this not precisely the image of the "Earth Pattern"?

"Names and actualities do not enter" means that neither names nor actualities can enter into it; that is, the state of emptiness and stillness transcends names and appearances.

向秀曰:任自然而覆载,则名利之饰皆为弃物。 而机发於踵,郭象曰:常在极上起。此为杜权。是殆见吾善者几也。 向秀曰:有善於彼,彼乃见之,明季咸之所见者浅矣。 卢曰:有权而不用,为杜也。若天之覆而未见其功,自下而升,为名实未入,故云有生矣。 政和:灰然有生者,或说以为不复然之中有生之意。向见其湿灰,则生之意已灭。灭则已矣,故以为弗活。今见其杜权,则动之用犹藏。然既以动矣,故以为有生。示中有生之意。向见其湿灰,则生之意已灭。灭则已矣,故以为弗活。今见其杜权,则动之用犹藏。然既以动矣,故以为有生。示之以天壤,壤者,土有息者也。所命於天者,於此有息焉,故曰天壤。名实不入,则真妄已冥。机发於踵,则息之所起,此所以为杜权也。盖其道不可见,而继道者如此而已,故曰是殆见吾善者几也。 范曰:有名有实是物之居,无名无实是物之虚。名实不入,而机发於踵,则未尝有未尝无也。虽静而无为,气自是而起焉。所谓真人之息以踵是也。示之以天壤,固当如此。季咸初见其湿灰,不知其为杜也。遂以为死。及见其全然有生,然后知向之死灰为杜权而非正也。是殆见吾善者几欤。
Interpretation

Xiang Xiu said: If one follows nature and covers and supports all things, then the adornments of fame and profit all become useless.

On “the incipient mechanism issues from the heel,” Guo Xiang (the Western Jin commentator on the Zhuangzi) said: this means it constantly arises at the highest point, which is called “Duquan” (the state of being closed, stored, and not yet revealed). This is probably because Jixian saw only a small sprout of goodness in me.

Xiang Xiu further said: only when my goodness surpassed his could he see it. From this we know that what Jixian saw was very shallow.

Master Lu said: to possess the authority (the incipient mechanism of change) but not to apply it is “Du.” It is like Heaven covering all things before its effects have yet appeared, rising upward from below. Name and actuality have not yet entered, and so it says “there is life.”

The Zhenghe commentator said: “Ashen yet possessing life” is sometimes explained as meaning that, in a state no longer like dead ashes, there is still a germ of life. What was seen before was like wet ashes; the germ of life had already been extinguished, and extinction is death, so Jixian considered him “not alive” (unable to live). What he saw now was “Duquan”; the operation of movement was still hidden, but since there was already movement, it says “there is life,” indicating that a germ of life was present within. “He showed him Heaven and Soil”: soil is land capable of generating life; the mandate endowed by Heaven here produces and reproduces without cease, and so it is called “Heaven and Soil.” When name and actuality do not enter, truth and delusion are both blended and dissolved together. “The incipient mechanism issues from the heel” is precisely the starting point of life and breath; this is “Duquan.” The Dao is fundamentally invisible, and one who can carry on the Dao is no more than this; therefore it says, “He probably saw only the minutest trace of the sprout of my goodness.”

Master Fan said: having name and actuality is where things dwell; having neither name nor actuality is the emptiness of things. When neither name nor actuality enters, and the incipient mechanism issues from the heel, one can say that it has never been existent and never been nonexistent. Though it is silent and Wuwei (non-action), Qi (vital energy) naturally arises from this; this is what is meant by the True Person breathing through the heels (Zhuangzi, “The Great and Venerable Teacher”). “He showed him Heaven and Soil”—this is exactly how it should be. When Jixian first saw the wet ashes, he did not know that this was the hidden “Du,” and so he thought he was dead. Only after seeing him completely alive did he realize that the earlier dead ashes were originally an image of concealment, not a true state of death.

尝又与来。明日,又与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:子之先生坐不斋,或无坐字。 向而非正也。是殆见吾善者几欤。 尝又与来。明日,又与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:子之先生坐不斋,或无坐字。 向秀曰:无往不平,混然一之。以筦窥天者,莫见其崖,故以不斋也。 吾无得而相焉。试斋,将且复相之。列子入告壶子。壶子曰:向吾示之以太冲莫眹, 向秀曰:居太冲之极,浩然泊心,玄同万方,莫见其迹。 是殆见吾衡气几也。衡,平也。鲵旋之潘音藩。为渊,止水之潘为渊,流水之潘为渊,滥水之潘为渊,沃水之潘为渊,汍水之潘为渊,雍水之潘为渊,汧水之潘 为渊,肥水之潘为渊,是为九渊矣。 此九水名义见《尔雅》。夫水一也,而随高下夷险,有洄激流止之异;似至人之心,因外物难易有动寂进退之容。向秀曰:夫水流之与止,鲵旋之与龙跃,常渊然自若,未始失其静默也。郭象夷险,有洄激流止之异;似至人之心,因外物难易有动寂进退之容。向秀曰:夫水流之与止,鲵旋之与龙跃,常渊然自若,未始失其静默也。郭象曰:夫至人用之则行,舍之则止。虽波流九变,治乱纷纭,若居其极者,常澹然.自得,泊乎无为也。
Interpretation

This passage comes from the story of Huzi revealing his appearances in the “Huangdi” chapter of the Liezi, with commentary interspersed. Liezi’s teacher Huzi confronted the spirit shaman Ji Xian, who could physiognomize people and determine their life and death.

On his second visit, after seeing Huzi, Ji Xian said to Liezi: “Your master’s spirit is unsettled, like one who has not fasted and is therefore not upright (zuo bu zhai). I cannot see his good or ill fortune, and I have no way to read his face. Wait until he has fasted, and then I will look at him again.” Liezi reported these words to Huzi.

Huzi said: “Just now what I let him see was ‘Tai Chong without signs.’ Tai Chong is the utmost empty-quiet realm of the Dao (the Way); zhen means sign or trace, so he could see no omen at all. What he saw this time was probably my condition of ‘balanced Qi at its subtle incipience.’ Balanced Qi is the peaceful Qi (vital energy) in which Yin-Yang are harmonized; ji is the faint beginning of movement.”

The commentary then draws an analogy with the nine waters: where the ni-fish coils, a deep pool forms; still water forms a deep pool; flowing water, overflowing water, poured water, and so on each form a deep pool—nine kinds in all, whose names are found in the Erya. Water’s nature is the same, yet depending on whether the terrain is high or low, level or steep, it eddies, surges, flows, or stops differently. The mind of the perfected person is likewise: according to whether external things are difficult or easy, it manifests differently as movement or stillness, advance or retreat. Xiang Xiu said: Whether the water flows or is still, whether the ni-fish coils or the dragon leaps, the depths remain clear and deep, never losing their silence. Guo Xiang said: When the perfected person is employed in the world, he acts; when set aside, he stops. Even after passing through all kinds of change, with order and chaos in endless confusion, he remains as though dwelling in the utmost place, always calm and self-possessed, tranquil in Wuwei (non-action).

卢曰:心运於太冲之气,漠然无迹,荡然有形,而转运不常,若水之变动殊名,未尝离乎渊澄也。故不得其状而辩之矣。 政和:地文则阴胜阳,天壤则阳胜阴,至於太冲,则有阴有阳而非阴非阳。故曰太冲莫眹。眹者,神之兆於物,阴阳不测,故莫得其眹也。且冲者,阴阳之交,太冲莫眹,则见其适平而已,故谓之衡气几。一阴一阳,冲而莫眹,证诸九渊,亦可知矣。潘者,反流之谓也,惟反流,然后能全一也。且冲者,阴阳之交,太冲莫眹,则见其适平而已,故谓之衡气几。一阴一阳,冲而莫眹,证诸九渊,亦可知矣。潘者,反流之谓也,惟反流,然后能全一。此潘者,所以皆渊也。鲵旋之潘为渊,以言全一於至动;止水之潘为渊,以言全一於或止;流水以喻夫出。与物交滥,则出之过也。沃水以喻夫入,为物泽泛,则入之穷也。雍则河水既出还复入,又异夫入之穷矣。汧则既出而不流,又异夫还复入矣。肥则出异而归同,盖反流全一者,其义尽於此也。然《庄子》独举其三者,盖别而为九,合而为三,其致一尔。
Interpretation

Mr. Lu says: The mind-spirit moves within the Great Harmony (Taichong, the supreme harmonious Qi), utterly still and without trace, yet vast and formless-yet-formed, revolving and operating without fixed norm—like water, which transforms into various different names yet never departs from the clear, still nature of the deep pool. Therefore it is impossible to depict its shape and distinguish it.

Zhenghe says: The atmosphere of the earth is one in which Yin prevails and Yang wanes; the atmosphere of the sky is one in which Yang prevails and Yin wanes. As for the Qi of the Great Harmony, it possesses both Yin and Yang, yet one cannot say it is purely Yin or purely Yang. Therefore it is said, "The Great Harmony has no zhen (portent)." "Zhen" refers to the wondrous signs by which spirit manifests upon the myriad things; the transformations of Yin and Yang are difficult to fathom, and thus no signs can be found. "Chong" is the place where Yin and Yang intersect and unite; the Qi of the Great Harmony shows no signs, and one can only see that it is precisely balanced and harmonious—therefore it is called "the pivot of balanced Qi." One Yin and one Yang surge against each other without visible signs; examining the nine springs mentioned in the Zhuangzi (the several pools of water referred to in the "Dasheng" chapter) will also make this principle clear.

"Pan" is the swirling backflow of water. Only through swirling backflow can water preserve its unity, and thus these "pan" can all form deep pools. The places where the salamander (a creature dwelling in water) rotates form deep pools—this illustrates preserving unity within utmost movement. Still water swirling back to form deep pools illustrates preserving unity within stillness. Flowing water is a metaphor for "emerging": when it comes into contact and mingles with external things, it is emerging too much. Stagnant water is a metaphor for "entering": when it is soaked and flooded by external things, it is entering to exhaustion. "Yong" is when river water both flows out and returns again—different from "entering to exhaustion." "Qian" is when water flows out and no longer moves—again different from returning inflow. "Fei" is when water flows out with individual differences yet returns to unity. The principle of backflow preserving unity is essentially exhausted in these. However, the Zhuangzi only cites three of them, because when analyzed separately they can be divided into nine, and when taken together they reduce to three—their essential purport always lies in unity.

范曰:地文则阴也,天壤则阳也。至其太於此也。然《庄子》独举其三者,盖别而为九,合而为三,其致一尔。 范曰:地文则阴也,天壤则阳也。至其太冲,则一阴一阳,如卫适平,是以谓之衡气几也。万法平等,无有高下,彼见自不齐耳,故无得而相焉。《老子》曰:心善渊,渊虚而静,不与物杂。波流之变,虽或不同,而渊湛之性,常自若也。所谓太冲者,盖亦若此。 尝又与来。明日,又与之见壶子。立未定,自失而走。壶子曰:追之。列子追之而不及,反以报壶子,曰:已灭矣,已失矣,吾不及也。壶子曰:向吾示之以未始出吾宗。 向秀曰:虽进退同群,而常深根宁极也。 吾与之虚而猗移, 向秀曰:无心以随变也。 不知其谁何, 向秀曰:泛然无所系者也。 因以为茅靡,因以为波流,故而猗移, 向秀曰:无心以随变也。 不知其谁何, 向秀曰:泛然无所系者也。 因以为茅靡,因以为波流,故逃也。茅靡当为颓靡。 向秀曰;变化颓靡,世事波流,无往不因,则为之非我。我虽不为,而与群俯仰。夫至人一也,然应世变而时动,故相者无所用其心,自失而走者也。 卢曰:绝思离念,入於无为,至虚而、无形,不见其相貌,如草之靡,如波之流,森然,泛然,非神巫之所识也。
Interpretation

Master Fan’s Commentary: Earth belongs to Yin and sky belongs to Yang. As for the state of Taichong, Yin and Yang are harmonized, like the beam of a scale kept in balance; hence it is called “the pivotal mechanism of balanced Qi” (the key to Yin-Yang balance). All things are originally equal, without distinction of high or low; it is only the observer who makes distinctions, and therefore physiognomy has no way to be applied. The Laozi says that the mind should be like a deep pool: the deep pool is empty, bright, clear, and still, not mixed with external things. The water waves flow and change; though their forms differ, the deep pool’s clear nature remains always the same. What is called “Taichong” is probably just like this.

The Original Story: Liezi again came following Huzi’s younger brother Jixian (a spirit shaman of Zheng who could read physiognomy and determine people’s life and death). The next day, Jixian met Huzi again. Before Jixian had even steadied himself, he fled in panic. Huzi said, “Quick, chase him!” Liezi gave chase but could not catch him; he returned and reported, “He has vanished, he is gone; I could not catch him.” Huzi said, “What I just let him see was the state in which the source had not yet manifested.”

Xiang Xiu’s Commentary: Although in advancing and retreating he is the same as others, inwardly he is always rooted in the depths and at peace in the fundament.

In the original text, the sentence “I faced him with emptiness and yielding movement” and the following lines: Huzi says: When I faced him, I used an attitude of emptiness, moving with the circumstances, like grass and trees bending before the wind, like waves turning with the current. Xiang Xiu comments that the mind has no fixation and complies with change; he also explains that “drifting without attachment” means floating along with the waves, not being entangled by anything.

“Thus it is like thatch bending down; thus it is like waves flowing” means following the changes of external things, like grass and trees bending down in the wind, like water waves moving with the current. “Therefore he fled”: Jixian could not see through him and could only flee. The commentary says that “maomi” should be written “tuimi,” meaning the appearance of bending down as things change.

Xiang Xiu’s Summary: Worldly affairs change like bending down, like flowing waves; wherever one goes, one follows along. Then what the physiognomist sees is no longer my true state. Although I do not deliberately act, I bow and raise my head together with the crowd. The nature of the perfected person is one and the same; he simply complies with worldly changes and moves with the times. Therefore Jixian, skilled in physiognomizing people, had no way to apply his mind and could only flee in panic.

Lu Chongxuan’s Commentary (Lu Chongxuan, a Tang dynasty Daoist): Cut off thinking, remove distracting thoughts, and enter the realm of Wuwei (non-action). Empty and still to the utmost, with no form visible, others cannot see his physiognomy. Like grass bending before the wind, like water moving with the current, profound and unrestricted—this is not something a spirit shaman can recognize.

范曰:季咸则有心而感者,故每入而皆曰见壶子;则无心而应者,故每至而皆曰示以有心而相无心;则累於形之流,森然,泛然,非神巫之所识也。 范曰:季咸则有心而感者,故每入而皆曰见壶子;则无心而应者,故每至而皆曰示以有心而相无心;则累於形数而未离见,见之处直以为死生在是而莫之逃也。故示之地文,则叹之以其死。示之以天壤,则幸之以其生。示之以太冲莫眹,则
Interpretation

Fan Yingyuan's commentary explains the story in Zhuangzi’s “Ying Diwang” (“The Normal Course for Rulers and Kings”) in which Jixian reads Huzi’s physiognomy.

Jixian was a spirit shaman from the state of Zheng who could discern people’s life and death, misfortune and fortune; Huzi was his teacher. The reason Jixian said each time he saw Huzi that he had “seen him” was that he looked with his own expectations and preconceptions—this belongs to “sensing with an intentional mind” (youxin er gan). If Huzi “responded without mind” (wuxin er ying), answering him without any attachment, then each time Jixian came he would say that what Huzi displayed was “having a mind,” yet he could also perceive the “no-mind” aspect in him. All of this was the result of his measuring things by his own intentions.

Therefore, even though Jixian had supernatural powers, he was still dragged along by physical form and the workings of qi and fate, and had not transcended the limitations of “seeing.” He thought the principle of life and death lay in what was visible before his eyes, and so he could not escape the fate of being seen through by Huzi.

Huzi showed him different realms, and his reactions changed accordingly. When Huzi revealed “Earth Patterns” (diwen)—a state as still and silent as the earth, akin to deathly stillness—Jixian immediately declared that this man was going to die. When Huzi revealed “Heaven and Earth” (tianrang)—a state like the circulation of vitality between heaven and earth—Jixian joyfully said that this man could live. This shows that Jixian could judge life and death only by external appearances and could not see Huzi’s true inner reality.

又名之以不斋,无得而相焉。曾不知至人之心,静而与阴同德,动而与阳同波。与阴同德彼亦不得而见焉,必示之以地文。文者,物之所自维也;与阳同波,彼亦不得而见焉,必示之以天壤。壤者物之所自生也。至於示之以地文。文者,物之所自维也;与阳同波,彼亦不得而见焉,必示之以天壤。壤者物之所自生也。至於示之以太冲莫眹,则又阴阳适中,无所偏胜,有所谓天地之中者。三者皆谓之几意。而动之微而见之,是故得而见之也。若夫未始出吾宗,则虽示而秘,彼将莫得而窥矣。此所以自失而走,追之弗及欤。然壶子之告列子,且曰:殆见吾杜德几,又曰:殆见吾善者几,又曰:殆见吾衡气几。皆曰吾者,由是立我矣。至於吾与之虚而委蛇,不知其谁何。虽吾亦丧之。示之者其谁邪?相之者其谁邪?其止也如茅之靡而不知其所以靡,其动也如波之流而不知其所以流,求我於动止之间,皆不可得,所以故逃也。 然后列子茅之靡而不知其所以靡,其动也如波之流而不知其所以流,求我於动止之间,皆不可得,所以故逃也。 然后列子自以为未始学而归,三年不出, 向秀曰:弃人事之近务也。 为其妻爨,向秀曰:遗耻辱。食稀如食人,向秀曰:忘贵贱也。於事无亲, 向秀曰:无适也无莫也。
Interpretation

Huzi let Liezi read his physiognomy, yet deliberately concealed his true condition, so Liezi could not discern whether he was real or empty. He did not realize that the mind of the perfected person, when still, shares its De with Yin (Yin refers to the soft, quiet, inwardly gathered aspect), and when moving, shares its waves with Yang (Yang refers to the firm, active, outwardly manifest aspect). When sharing De with Yin, others still cannot see it, and so he lets them see the “patterns of Earth” (diwen); “wen” are the veins by which the myriad things are held together and take form. When sharing waves with Yang, others also cannot see it, and so he lets them see “Heaven’s soil” (tianrang); “rang” is the root by which the myriad things grow.

As for displaying “the Great Vacuity with no trace” (Taichong mozhen)—the deepest, emptiest, untraceable state—Yin and Yang are harmonized, with neither predominating; this is precisely what is called the center of Heaven and Earth. These three conditions may all be called “ji” (the first subtle stirring, the incipient sign of a thing). Only one who can perceive these incipient signs in the subtle movements can see Huzi. If he has not yet come forth from the source, then even when he displays himself, he remains hidden and unmanifest, and others ultimately have no way to glimpse him. This is why Liezi fled in panic and could not be caught.

Yet when Huzi spoke to Liezi, he said: “What I displayed was the incipience of blocking De (the sign of De closed and stored),” “the incipience of goodness (the sign of what is good),” “the incipience of balanced Qi (the sign of breath and Qi at peace).” These statements all refer to himself as “wu” (I), which amounts to positing a “wo” (self) once again. When even “wu” becomes empty and compliant, so that one does not know who one is, then one’s own person has also been lost. Who, then, is manifesting? Who is having his physiognomy read? When he stops, he is like thatch falling before the wind, yet he does not know why it falls; when he flows, he is like waves driven onward, yet he does not know why they flow. To seek a “self” between movement and stillness is impossible; therefore he can leave others with no way to grasp him, and they depart.

Thereupon Liezi, believing that he had not truly completed his learning, returned home and shut his door for three years without going out.

Xiang Xiu’s commentary: This means he abandoned the nearby tasks of human affairs. He kindled the fire and cooked for his wife and children; Xiang Xiu comments: He forgot shame. He fed the pigs as he fed people; Xiang Xiu comments: He forgot the distinction between noble and base. In dealing with matters he made no distinction of close and distant; Xiang Xiu comments: He had no partial preference and no partial neglect (the sense of the Analects’ “to have nothing for or against”).

雕琢复朴,块然独以其形立, 向秀曰:雕琢之文,复其真朴,则外事去矣。 f然而封戎,向秀曰:真不散也。戎或作哉字。壹以是终。向秀曰:遂得道也。 卢曰:忘是非,等贵贱,齐物我,息外缘,不封於我,守一而终,然后契真。 政和:未始出吾宗者,盖圣人以天为宗。藏於天,故未始出吾宗也。余见《庄子解》 范曰:学者,学其所不能学也。列子之於道,既其文,未既其实。故自以为。藏於天,故未始出吾宗也。余见《庄子解》 范曰:学者,学其所不能学也。列子之於道,既其文,未既其实。故自以为未始学而归,将以学其所不能学也。三年不出,为其妻爨,食豕如食人,则忘我之至也。於事无为亲,则致虚之极也。雕琢复朴,则既雕既琢,复归於朴也。块然独以其形立,则似遗物离人而立於独也。纷然而封哉,一以是终,则万绪扰扰虽撄而宁,而终莫之变也。 冲虚至德真经四解卷之五竟 7-冲虚至德真经四解卷之六 冲虚至德真经四解卷之六 黄帝 子列子之齐,中道而反, 惊人之推敬於己,故不敢遂进。 遇伯昏瞀人。伯昏瞀人曰:奚方而反?曰:吾惊焉。恶乎惊?吾食於十浆,客舍卖浆之家,而五浆先馈。 人皆敬下敬於己,故不敢遂进。
Interpretation

First Passage of The True Scripture of Ultimate Emptiness and Perfect De

Scriptural text: “Carved and polished, it returns to plainness; solitary like a clod, it stands alone by its own form; though the multitudinous closes in around it, with the One it remains to the end.”

After a vessel has been carved and polished, it returns once more to the plainness of its original nature, like a whole lump of earth or stone standing alone and preserving its original shape. When the multifarious external things gather around, it is not moved, and it keeps guard over this “One” (the focused, non-dual original nature) until the end.

“Returning to plainness” comes from Laozi’s “return to the uncarved wood”; it means removing artificial adornment and returning to natural authenticity.

The main points of the various commentators are as follows. Xiang Xiu held that when adornment returns to original authenticity, external affairs accordingly recede. Master Lu held that one must forget right and wrong, treat noble and base as equal, equate things and the self, stop external entanglements, not be bound by external things, and guard this “One” until the end; only then can one accord with the true Dao. Master Fan held that “standing alone, solitary like a clod” means forgetting external things and departing from the world, while “the multitudinous closes in around it” means that although myriad disturbances touch one, one remains peaceful and in the end is not changed.

Passage from the “Yellow Emperor” Chapter

Scriptural text: “Master Liezi was going to Qi and turned back halfway. He met Bohun Maoren, who said, ‘Why are you returning?’ He replied, ‘I was frightened.’ ‘What frightened you?’ ‘I ate at ten drink-shops—inns that sold drinks—and five of them brought me drinks first.’”

Liezi (Lie Yukou) set out for Qi but turned back halfway. On the way he met Bohun Maoren, who asked him why he was returning. Liezi said, “I was frightened.” “What frightened you?” “I was eating at ten shops that sold drinks, and the owners of five of them rushed to bring me something to drink first.”

Key point of the commentary: The “fright” here is not fright at danger. Rather, because people showed him excessive respect, he felt uneasy and did not dare go farther. This reflects the Daoist attitude of not craving empty reputation and not taking pleasure in external honors.

遇伯昏瞀人。伯昏瞀人曰:奚方而反?曰:吾惊焉。恶乎惊?吾食於十浆,客舍卖浆之家,而五浆先馈。 人皆敬下之也。 伯昏瞀人曰:若是,则汝何为惊己?曰:夫内诚不饵, 郭象曰:外自矜饰,内不释然也。 形谋成光, 郭象曰:举动便辟成光仪。 以外镇人心, 外以矜严服物,内实不足。 使人轻乎贵老, 使人轻而尊长之者,由其形饥成光故也。 而H其所恶。 郭象曰:以美形动物,则所患乱至也。 夫浆人特为食羹之货,多余之赢, 所货者羹食,所利者盈余而已。 其为利也薄,其为权也轻,而犹若是。 郭象曰:权轻利薄,可无求於人,而皆敬己,是高下大小无所失者。 而况万乘之主,身劳於国,而智尽於事, 所以不敢之齐。 彼将任我以事,而效我以功,吾是以惊。 推此类也,则货轻者望利薄,任重者责功於事, 所以不敢之齐。 彼将任我以事,而效我以功,吾是以惊。 推此类也,则货轻者望利薄,任重者责功多。
Interpretation

Liezi turned back halfway and met Bohun Maoren (Liezi’s teacher, a man who had attained the Dao). Bohun Maoren asked: “Why have you turned back midway?” Liezi said: “I was frightened.” Bohun Maoren asked: “Frightened by what?” Liezi said: “I passed by ten shops selling drinks and asked for water to drink. Among them, five eagerly brought the drink to me first, and everyone treated me with respect and deference.”

Bohun Maoren said: “That being so, why are you still alarmed?”

This means that people’s respect for you has its cause outside, not inside. When there is no sincerity within but one deliberately embellishes the exterior, and the outward form is contrived, it becomes a mere display of bearing; using such a bearing to overawe the hearts of the crowd will lead people to slight their elders and superiors. Guo Xiang’s commentary says that to move the crowd with a splendid outward appearance is to bring disorder and calamity in its wake.

The drink sellers merely made their profit by selling broth and drink; what they earned was a residual, petty gain, their profit was meager, and their power was slight, yet someone was still treated with such respect. Guo Xiang’s commentary says: with light power and thin profit, one need not seek anything from others, yet everyone respects one; thus, whether one’s position is high or low, great or small, none will lose their proper measure.

How much more so for a ruler with ten thousand chariots of war, who wears out his body laboring for the affairs of state and devotes all his intelligence to government—he would entrust affairs to me and require me to establish achievements. That is why I feel frightened.

By extension: one whose goods are slight hopes for little profit, while one whose responsibility is heavy demands many achievements.

政和:古之至人,明白入素,无为复朴,天机不张,默与道契、惛然若亡而存,油然不形而神。则知我希而我贵矣。内诚不解,则未能忘心;形谋成光,则未能遗形。以外镇人心,使人轻乎贵老而重己,身劳於国,智尽於士,则惨怛之疾恬愉之安时集於体,怵迫之恐欣惧之喜交溺於心。H其所患,有,如此者,又乌能无惊乎哉? 范曰:圣人披褐怀玉而全其形,生之人藏其身也,不厌深渺而已。内诚不解,则非致道而忘心也。形谋成光,则非葆光而不耀也。食於十浆而五浆先馈,则是有以外镇人心,使人轻乎贵老而重己也。至人尸居环堵之室,则非致道而忘心也。形谋成光,则非葆光而不耀也。食於十浆而五浆先馈,则是有以外镇人心,使人轻乎贵老而重己也。至人尸居环堵之室,而百姓猖狂不知所如。往今有以使人轻乎贵老而重己,则H其所患,而自贻也。其岂披褐怀 玉而藏其身之道哉? 伯昏瞀人曰:善哉观乎。 汝知惊此者,是善观察者也。 汝处己,人将保汝矣。 汝若默然不自显耀,适齐之与处此,皆无所惧。苟违此义,所在见保矣。
Interpretation

Zhenghe Commentary: The perfected persons of antiquity could return to plainness, without ornamentation, comply with the natural workings of the mind, and silently accord with the Dao (the Way). They were dim and obscure as if nothing existed, and yet they existed; wholly without revealing their traces, their Shen (spirit) was nevertheless full. From this one knows that not seeking external reputation makes one more noble. If inner sincerity and reverence are insufficient, one cannot forget the calculating mind; if both appearance and scheming are to shine forth, one cannot forget the bodily form. If external things are used to restrain people’s minds, making them slight the noble truth and value themselves, wearing out the body in affairs of state and exhausting wisdom in human affairs, then inner grief and suffering, together with the joy of peace and security, will all gather upon the person at once; the panic of being driven by fear and the fright of joy will alternately sink into the heart. How could the calamities brought about in this way fail to make one afraid?

Fan Commentary: The sage wears coarse cloth and carries fine jade within; in preserving his bodily form, he simply lets the true nature within life be stored inside him, not shrinking from what is deeply hidden and subtly remote. When inner sincerity and reverence are insufficient, it is not that he has truly attained the Dao and forgotten the calculating mind; when appearance and scheming shine forth, it is not that he can contain his radiance and keep it from showing. To receive ten portions of broth, with five offered first—this is to rely on some device to restrain people’s minds, making them slight the noble truth and value themselves. The perfected person dwells at peace in a humble hut, while the common people are feverish and do not know where to go. If someone today uses this method to make people slight the noble and value themselves, then the calamities he attracts are brought upon himself. How could this be the principle of wearing coarse cloth, cherishing fine jade, and hiding one’s body?

Bohun Maoren (a Dao-realized figure in the Liezi) said: “Well said—your observation! That you could be startled by this shows that you are good at observing. If you keep to your proper station, others will come to protect you. If you remain silent and do not display yourself, then whether you go to Qi or stay here, there will be nothing to fear. If you go against this principle, then wherever you go, you will only be regarded as someone to be protected.”

卢曰:见威仪以示人,故人轻死以尊敬。将恐人主之劳於事也,必委以责功,食禄增忧,所以惊惧耳。伯昏曰:汝能退身以全真,含光以灭迹,人将保汝矣。何则?进善之心,人皆有之。多利之地,人皆竞之。中人之性,可上可下,知名利之不可强也,则进善以自修。《诗》《书》《礼》《乐》事不易习,若退迹守闲,灰心灭智也,无招招之利,得善人之名,故学道之门,上可下,知名利之不可强也,则进善以自修。《诗》《书》《礼》《乐》事不易习,若退迹守闲,灰心灭智也,无招招之利,得善人之名,故学道之门,善恶同趣者。君子以澄心,小人以诲身,虽不体悟,亦从善之益之也。故曰人将保汝矣。 无几何而往,则户外之屦满矣。归之果众伯昏瞀人北面而立,敦杖蹙之乎颐,敦, 坚也。立有间,不言而出。宾者以告列子。列子提履徒跣而走,暨乎门,问曰:先生既来,曾不废药乎。 废,置也,曾无善言以当药石也。 卢曰:废,当为发,先生既来,何不发药石之言,少垂训耳。 曰:已矣。吾固告汝曰人将保汝,果保汝矣。非汝能使人保, 顺乎理以接物,则物不保之。今背理而感物,求物不保,不可得。 而汝不能使人无汝,
Interpretation

Lu Sheng said: If a person assumes a dignified and imposing demeanor before others, people will instead, on that account, regard death lightly and thereby respect him. This is probably because they worry that the ruler will be exhausted by government affairs, and so they hand responsibility to their subordinates and require them to achieve merit; as their stipends increase, their anxieties follow, and therefore they are alarmed and fearful.

Bohun Maoren said: If you can gather yourself inward, preserve your true nature, hide your light, and leave no trace, others will protect you. Why is this? Everyone has a heart that aspires upward toward goodness; wherever there is profit to be gained, everyone rushes to contend for it. People of middling capacity can be led upward or downward in their nature. Once they understand that fame and profit cannot be forced, they should cultivate themselves in accord with good thoughts. Learning such subjects as the Odes, Documents, Rites, and Music is not easy to master. If one withdraws one’s traces, keeps to purity and stillness, makes the mind like dead ashes, and extinguishes wisdom, there will be no opportunity to attract profit or win the name of a good person. Therefore, at the gate of learning the Dao, good and evil ultimately all arrive at the same place. The noble person cultivates the self with a clear mind, while the petty person restrains the self through instruction; even without true realization, they will benefit because they incline toward goodness. Hence it is said, others will protect you.

(Note: The Daoist term zhen refers to original nature, true nature; “extinguishing traces” means leaving no trace.)

Before long, Liezi went again to visit Bohun Maoren. As soon as he entered, he saw that the shoes outside the door were already packed full, showing that many people had come seeking instruction. Bohun Maoren stood facing north, with his staff propped under his chin. After standing for a while, he went out without a word. A visitor told Liezi about this. Liezi immediately picked up his shoes and ran out barefoot. Catching up with him at the gate, he asked: “Since you have come, sir, would you refuse to prescribe a dose of medicine for me?”

(Note: “Fei” means to set aside or lay aside; here it means that the master did not utter a single beneficial word to provide a remedy suited to the illness.)

Lu Chongxuan’s commentary says: “Fei” should be “fa,” meaning: since the master has come, why does he not utter good words like medicine and stone and offer a little guidance?

Bohun Maoren said: Enough! I told you from the start, “Others will protect you,” and indeed others have protected you. This is not because you can make others protect you; it is because, complying with the nature of things, you receive external objects, and external objects naturally do not harm you. Now, if you defy the nature of things in responding to external objects, yet wish external objects not to harm you, that cannot be done.

And you cannot prevent others from coming to rely on you…

顺乎理以接物,则物不保之。今背理而感物,求物不保,不可得。 而汝不能使人无汝保也。 郭象曰:任平而化,则无感无求。无感无求,乃不相保。 卢曰:汝之退身全行,绝学弃智,人所以保汝者,非汝能召之也。若能灭迹混真,愚智不显者,人亦不知保汝矣。由是言之,汝之行适足为人所保,而不能使人不保也。 而焉用之感也? 汝用何术乃感物如此乎? 应豫出异。 郭象曰:先物施惠,惠不因彼豫出而异也。 且必有感也,摇而本汝用何术乃感物如此乎? 应豫出异。 郭象曰:先物施惠,惠不因彼豫出而异也。 且必有感也,摇而本身,又无谓也。 必恒使物感己,则彼我之性动易之。 与汝游者,莫汝告也。 皆是摇本之徒,不能相启悟者也。 彼所小言,尽人毒也。 小言细巧,易以感人,故为人毒害也。 莫觉莫悟,何相孰也。不能相成济也。 卢曰:汝用何道感之耶?必赞胜豫之词而出奇异之教,摇鼓汝舌,见能於众物,虽靡然顺汝,有何益耶?与汝同居者,不攻汝之短,但称汝之长,如此适足毒汝之行,骄汝之心,有何相成耶?
Interpretation

Gist of the original text: If you accord with the patterns of things in dealing with people and affairs, external things will naturally come to preserve you. Now you go against those patterns and wish to use resonance with external things to seek preservation by external things; that cannot be obtained. Nor can you make others refrain from attaching themselves to you.

Guo Xiang (a Western Jin Xuanxue thinker and commentator on Daoist classics) says: Allow natural, peaceful transformation, and there is neither resonance nor seeking. Without resonance and seeking, people will not attach themselves to one another.

Lu Chongxuan (a Tang Daoist and commentator on the Liezi) says: If you withdraw and preserve yourself, cut off learning and discard cleverness, the reason others protect you is not that you can summon them. If you can conceal your traces and merge with true simplicity, so that neither foolishness nor wisdom shows outwardly, others will also not wish to protect you. From this we see that your conduct simply causes people to attach to you, but cannot make people refrain from attaching to you.

Then why should you use the art of resonance? By what means can you move external things to such a degree?

If you rush to bestow benefits first and respond by making yourself novel and distinctive, the beneficence will not differ because the other gave first. (This commentary sentence is lacunose; the gist is that bestowing kindness before the other does not alter the other’s response.)

If you insist on having resonance, you will unsettle your original nature, and doing so is meaningless. If at every moment you want external things to resonate with you, then the natures of both sides will be unsettled and changed.

Among those who associate with you, no one tells you the truth; all are people who unsettle their original nature and cannot awaken one another. The trivial, cleverly embellished words they speak harm people like poison. Petty words easily stir the human heart, and so one is poisoned by them.

Without awakening, how can people mutually fulfill one another?

Lu Chongxuan further says: By what Dao do you influence external things? If you must speak words of praise and flattery, play with strange teachings, wag your lips and tongue, and show off that you can surpass the myriad things, even if all things submit to you, what benefit is there? If those who dwell with you do not point out your faults but only praise your strengths, this precisely corrupts your conduct and makes your heart arrogant—how can this be called mutual fulfillment?

政?与汝同居者,不攻汝之短,但称汝之长,如此适足毒汝之行,骄汝之心,有何相成耶? 政和:善哉观乎者,善其能内省。汝处己者,告之使退藏。至人抱神以游世俗之间,使人无得而窥之,故必处己。而不处己,则人将保汝矣。人之保汝,非所谓无得而窥者也。故感而后应,不求有异,是乃所以使人无保汝之道也。感豫则感而后应,出异则求有以异。若是者,非特人果保汝而见有於人,且必有感,摇而本身,不能不累於物。夫与汝游者,莫汝告也,则无自而觉。彼以小言,尽人毒也,则适以为患。莫觉莫悟,安能反於其道乎?故曰:何相孰也?相孰者,谓相与熏蒸至於成也。 范曰:感而后应,体性抱神以游世俗之间者,乃所以使人无保汝之道。感豫则非感而后应也,出异则非游乎熏蒸至於成也。 范曰:感而后应,体性抱神以游世俗之间者,乃所以使人无保汝之道。感豫则非感而后应也,出异则非游乎世之间也。用是则与人为徒,则邓墟之家从汝者万,齐国之众价汝者三,尸而祝之,社而稷之;若畏垒之细民,又将窃窃然欲俎豆予于贤人之间,而脱屦户外者,殆将满矣。必且有感,摇而本身,乌能和豫通而不失於见耶?故莫告而小言者,尽为人毒以害性;而莫觉莫悟者,又不能相与熏蒸以至於成也。然则食於十浆,而五浆先馈者,汝将固惊耶?
Interpretation

This passage of scripture concerns how a cultivator of the Dao preserves original nature amid the worldly realm, so that he is neither seen through by others nor clung to by them.

The Zhenghe Commentary says: To be able to examine oneself inwardly is good. The Perfected Person (zhiren), whose cultivation has reached fullness, embraces the spirit (baoshen) and does not reveal it outwardly; he moves through the ordinary world in such a way that no one can fathom his depths. Therefore he must “keep to himself” (chuji)—that is, guard himself and not readily expose himself. If one cannot guard oneself, people will attach themselves to you and take possession of you. And once you are attached to, you are no longer the person whose depths cannot be fathomed. Thus one should wait until there is a stimulus before responding, and not deliberately seek to be different; this is precisely the way to make it impossible for others to attach to you. If one responds with a preset design beforehand, or deliberately displays something different from ordinary people, then one is seeking others’ attention. The result will be not only that one really will be attached to and exposed before others, but that one will inevitably be stirred by external things, have one’s nature shaken, and be unable not to be entangled by them. As for those who associate with you: if no one speaks directly and warns you, you have no way to notice your own faults; if someone leads you with shallow words, it instead poisons your nature and becomes a disaster. Since no one perceives it and no one awakens to it, how can one return to the Great Dao? Therefore the scripture says, “How can there be mutual shu?” “Xiang shu” means mutually steeping and transforming (xunzheng) one another until something is accomplished.

The Fan Commentary says (first passage): To respond only after there is a stimulus, to preserve one’s nature and embrace the spirit while roaming amid the world—this is exactly the way to make it impossible for others to attach to you. To have a preset design beforehand is not “responding after being stimulated”; to deliberately display something different from ordinary people is also not “roaming amid the world.”

The Fan Commentary says (second passage; the wording differs slightly from the preceding): If one follows such a mindset and associates with people, those who follow you around Dengxu will number in the tens of thousands, and the people of the state of Qi will regard you as noble, treat you like a spirit, and respect you as in the sacrifices to the altars of soil and grain. Even the ordinary folk at the foot of Weilei Mountain will secretly wish to rank you among the worthies, set out zudou (sacrificial vessels), and remove their shoes outside your gate to seek instruction, almost filling your courtyard. If this continues, you will surely be moved and your nature shaken—how then can you remain calm and penetrating without losing your authenticity? Therefore, those who are unwilling to admonish directly, and those who speak only shallow words, will be poisoned and have their nature damaged; and when no one perceives and no one awakens, people cannot mutually influence one another so as to reach accomplishment. This is like drinking ten kinds of beverages, five of which are served first—would you be surprised by this?

杨朱南之沛,老聃西游於秦,邀於郊。至梁而遇老子。 《庄子》云:杨子居,子居或杨朱之字,又不与老子伺时,此皆寓言,老聃西游於秦,邀於郊。至梁而遇老子。 《庄子》云:杨子居,子居或杨朱之字,又不与老子伺时,此皆寓言也。 老子中道仰天而叹曰:始以汝为可教,今不可教也。 与至人游而未能去其矜夸,故曰不可教者也。 杨子不答。至舍,进涫漱巾栉,脱履户外,膝行而前,曰:向者夫子仰天而叹曰:始以汝为可教,今不可教。弟子欲请夫子辞,行不间,是以不敢。今夫子间矣,请问其过。老子日:而睢睢而盱盱,而谁与居? 汝云何自居处而夸张若此,使物故欺之乎? 大白若辱,盛德若不足。 不与物竞,则常处卑而守约也。 杨朱蹴然变容曰:敬闻命矣。其往也,舍迎将家,客舍家也。公执席,妻执巾栉,舍者避席,炀者避灶。厚自箴异,则物惮之也。其反也,舍者与之争席矣。 自同於物,物所不恶也。
Interpretation

Yang Zhu traveled south to Pei, while Lao Dan went west to Qin. The two met in the outskirts, and when they reached Liang, Yang Zhu encountered Laozi. The commentary cites the Zhuangzi as saying that Yang Ziju—Ziju perhaps being Yang Zhu’s courtesy name—and Laozi were not people of the same era, and that this meeting is therefore an allegory.

Laozi sighed heavenward halfway along the road and said, “At first I thought you could be taught; now it seems you cannot be taught.” This is because Yang Zhu associated with a perfected person—someone whose cultivation had reached the highest level—and yet had not rid himself of the fault of self-display, so Laozi said he could not be taught.

Yang Zhu did not reply. When they reached their lodging, he first brought hot water for rinsing his mouth, then fetched a towel and comb, took off his shoes, stood outside the door, knelt, and shuffled forward on his knees, saying, “Just now, Master, you sighed heavenward and said, ‘At first I thought you could be taught; now you cannot be taught.’ Your disciple wishes to ask Master to point out my faults, but you were hurrying along the road, and I did not dare speak. Now that Master has stopped, please permit me to ask about my faults.” Laozi said, “You have wide-open eyes and a proud manner—who would be willing to dwell with you? Why do you exalt and pride yourself in this way, making such a display of yourself, so that others deliberately deceive you?”

The whitest thing appears to have stains; one of profound virtue appears to be lacking. This means that by not contending with external things, one can long preserve humility and keep to frugality.

When Yang Zhu heard this, his expression became alarmed and his face changed greatly. He said, “I respectfully receive the instruction.” When he went to the inn, the people of the inn came out to welcome him; the host himself spread a mat, the host’s wife brought a towel and comb, the travelers yielded their seats, and even the cook avoided the stove. This was because he exerted himself to advertise his difference from others, and so everyone stood in awe of him. But when he returned, the people of the inn contended with him for seats.

In the commentary, Lu Chongxuan explains: one who truly cultivates in concealment has no heart of self-praise and does not display himself. By being the same as the multitude, he will not be disliked by others.

卢曰:夫真隐之者,无矜夸炀者避灶。厚自箴异,则物惮之也。其反也,舍者与之争席矣。 自同於物,物所不恶也。 卢曰:夫真隐之者,无矜夸之声,无可贵之容。故杨子之往也,人迎送之;及闻善而政,居者与之争席矣。前章言列子之使人保汝,而此章言杨朱能使人无汝保也。 政和:良贾深藏若虚,君子盛德容貌若愚。知我者希,则我贵矣。彼饰智以惊愚,矫激以为异,自衒自鬻,何足以语夫道?夫列子无意於骇人,犹或非之。则杨朱更貌改容有意於异众,其曰不可教也,宜矣。大白若辱者,涤除玄览而不睹一疵,虽受天下之垢,然不修身以明污也;盛德若不足者,德无以加,而不自以为有余,所谓上德不德也。杨朱闻命而往,合者争席,几是已。盖其往也,将迎执避,众异之如彼也;及其反也,合者争席,言众轻之如此也,是以圣人披褐怀玉。故去彼取此。 范曰:贼莫大乎德。有心而也,将迎执避,众异之如彼也;及其反也,合者争席,言众轻之如此也,是以圣人披褐怀玉。故去彼取此。 范曰:贼莫大乎德。有心而心有眼,又况於睢睢盱盱者乎?睢则逆而不顺,盱则干而不直,盖内视已败而外若有营之意。大白若辱,虽涤玄览而常处,众人之所恶;盛德若不足者,虽日新无敝而不自以为有余。审造乎是,则合者与之争席矣。
Interpretation

Yang Zhu was someone who truly lived in seclusion and cultivated the Dao (the Way). He did not boast about himself, nor did he dazzle others with a precious appearance. When he went to a certain place, people welcomed him and saw him off; by the time everyone heard that he was skilled at governing, those lodging with him contended to share his mat. The previous chapter says that Liezi caused people to preserve you; this chapter says that Yang Zhu could cause people not to need to preserve you.

One who is good at commerce stores goods deeply, so that he seems empty; a gentleman whose De (Virtue/Power) is full appears foolish in countenance. Those who truly understand me are few, and so I become precious. As for those who show off cleverness to overawe the foolish, deliberately act extreme to seek distinction, and boast and promote themselves—how could they be fit to discuss the Great Dao? Liezi did not deliberately astonish the world, and yet he still drew criticism; that Yang Zhu altered his appearance and deliberately made himself different from the crowd, and was regarded as unteachable, was only natural.

The purest and brightest thing seems to bear dirt, because the mind is washed clean and not the slightest blemish is seen; even when it receives the dirt of the world, it does not adorn itself to make a display of impurity. One whose De is full seems to be lacking, because De can no longer be increased, and so he does not consider himself to have surplus. This is what is called “the highest De is not De”—the highest De does not deliberately display itself as De. Yang Zhu received the command and went; the crowd contended for the mat—this was probably so. When he went, their welcoming and sending off, clinging and avoiding astonished the crowd; when he returned, the crowd contended for the mat, which again showed that everyone alike made light of him. Therefore the sage wears coarse cloth while harboring beautiful jade, knowing to reject the former and take the latter.

Fan’s commentary says: Nothing does more harm to oneself than a De that is deliberately displayed. When there are calculations in the mind, the eyes will spy; how much more so with those who open their eyes wide and glance sideways to peer? Opening the eyes wide is contrary and not compliant; glancing sideways is seeking and not upright—this is probably because inner understanding has already been corrupted, while outwardly there is an intention to seek. “Great whiteness seems stained”: even if the mirror of the mind is washed clean and constantly abides in this, one will still be disliked by the crowd; “abundant De seems insufficient”: even if one is daily renewed and entirely without defect, one does not consider oneself to have surplus. If one can investigate thoroughly to this level, then those who share his mat will contend to associate with him.

杨朱过宋,东之於逆旅。逆旅人有妾二人,其一人美,其一人恶,恶者贵而美者贱。杨子问其故。逆旅小子对曰:其美者自美,吾不知其美也;其恶者自恶,吾不知其恶也。杨子曰:弟子记之。行贤而去自贤之行,安往而不爱哉? 夫骄盈矜伐,鬼神人道之所不与;虚己以修理,天下之所乐推。以此而往,孰能距之? 卢曰:此重结前两科之义之。行贤而去自贤之行,安往而不爱哉? 夫骄盈矜伐,鬼神人道之所不与;虚己以修理,天下之所乐推。以此而往,孰能距之? 卢曰:此重结前两科之义也。夫能使人保於我者,其不保者,心嫉之哉?不敢令物之保己也,则天下皆忘其恶矣,况逆旅之妾乎? 政和:自道观之,物无美恶,知美之为美,则恶为之对。世之所美者为神奇,所恶者为臭腐。神奇复化为臭腐,臭腐复化为神奇,则美与恶奚辩?圣人不藏是非美恶,虚己以游世而已。不矜不伐,所谓行贤而去自贤之行,天下莫与之争能,亦莫与之争功,所谓安往而不爱也。
Interpretation

Yang Zhu passed through the state of Song and lodged at an inn. The inn had two concubines, one beautiful and one ugly; in the end the ugly one was respected, while the beautiful one was treated with contempt. Yang Zhu asked the reason. The young servant at the inn replied, “That beautiful woman considers herself beautiful, but I do not find her beautiful; that ugly woman considers herself ugly, but I do not find her ugly.” Yang Zhu said, “Remember this. Cultivate your character and conduct, yet no longer consider yourself virtuous—then wherever you go, how could people not love you?”

(The Daoists) hold that those who are arrogant, self-satisfied, and boastful will not win the approval even of ghosts and spirits or of the moral judgment of the world; those who are humble, self-restrained, and cultivate themselves are gladly honored by all under Heaven. With such an attitude toward the world, who could resist him?

(The commentator) Lu Chongxuan says: This again summarizes the essential meaning of the preceding two passages. Cultivate character and conduct without considering yourself virtuous, and wherever you go you will be loved. The arrogant, self-satisfied, and boastful win approval neither from ghosts and spirits nor from the world; the humble, self-restrained, and self-cultivating are honored by all under Heaven. With such an attitude toward the world, who could resist him?

Lu Chongxuan further says: If one can make others naturally value oneself, then as for those who are not valued, could they be people who are jealous at heart? If one does not presume to have external things value oneself, then all under Heaven will forget one’s faults—how much more so a mere concubine in an inn?

(The commentator) Zhenghe says: From the perspective of the Dao (the Way), the myriad things originally have no distinction between beauty and ugliness. Once one knows why the beautiful is beautiful, ugliness is set over against it. What the world calls beautiful is the wondrous and extraordinary; what it detests is the foul and rotten. But the wondrous and extraordinary in turn transforms into the foul and rotten, and the foul and rotten in turn transforms into the wondrous and extraordinary—so what distinction between beauty and ugliness remains? The sage does not cling to right and wrong, beauty and ugliness, but simply maintains an empty mind and follows worldly affairs as they are. Not being self-conceited and not boasting—this is what is meant by “cultivating character and conduct without considering oneself virtuous”; when no one under Heaven contends with him over ability, nor anyone over merit, this is what is meant by “being loved wherever he goes.”

范曰:道无异相,孰美孰恶勺天下皆知美之为美,斯恶已。道无殊品,何贵何贱?以物观之,自贵而相贱也。然则逆旅之妾,孰知其所以然哉?惟美,斯恶已。道无殊品,何贵何贱?以物观之,自贵而相贱也。然则逆旅之妾,孰知其所以然哉?惟行贤而去自贤之行,则天下乐推而不厌矣。 天下有常胜之道,有不常胜之道。常胜之道曰柔,常不胜之道曰强。二者亦知,亦当作易。而人未之知。故上古之言:强,先不己若者; 所胜在己下者耳。 柔,先出於己者, 不与物竞,则物不能加也。 先不己若者,至於若己,则殆矣。 遇敌必危之也。 先出於己者,亡所殆矣。理常安也。以此胜一身若徒,以此任天下若徒,谓不胜而自胜,不任而自任也。 夫体柔虚之道,处不竞之地,虽一身之贵,天下之大,无心而御之,同於徒矣。徒,空黜之谓也。郭象曰:听耳之所闻,视目之所见,知止其所不知,能止虽一身之贵,天下之大,无心而御之,同於徒矣。徒,空黜之谓也。郭象曰:听耳之所闻,视目之所见,知止其所不知,能止其所不能,用其自用,为其自为,顺性而不竞於物者,此至柔之道也。故举其自举,持其自持,既无分铢之重,而我无力焉。
Interpretation

The Dao Has No Distinction of High and Low

The Dao has no distinctions of form—how could there be beauty and ugliness? When all under heaven know beauty as beauty, ugliness comes along with it. Nor does the Dao have distinctions of rank—how could there be noble and base? It is only that people view things from the standpoint of things, each taking something as noble, and so they disparage one another. How could those like the women in the inn understand the reason for this? Only by cultivating worthy virtue and removing the thought of being worthy will all under heaven delight in exalting such a person and never grow weary.

The Principle of Softness and Strength

In the affairs of the world there is a principle that can always win and a principle that cannot always win. What can always win is softness; what cannot always win is strength. These two are in themselves knowable and should be comprehended in the manner of the principles of the Changes, yet people do not understand them. Therefore the ancients said: “Strength means first overpowering those who are not as good as oneself; what it overcomes is merely those weaker than oneself. Softness means first beginning with oneself—first reflecting on oneself, first restraining oneself.”

The commentator further explains: once the strong meet an opponent equal to themselves, they are in danger; when they encounter an enemy, they are certain to fall into danger. The soft do not contend with external things, so external things cannot harm them; therefore they are without danger and, by principle, always remain secure.

Cultivation through “Tu”

Using this method to cultivate oneself is like being empty and without things; using it to bear responsibility for all under heaven is also like being empty and without things. This is what is meant by not seeking victory and yet naturally winning, not taking on responsibility and yet naturally being able to take it on. “Tu” means emptiness and non-attachment.

To realize the Dao of softness and emptiness, to dwell in a place of non-contention—even if one is noble oneself and all under heaven is vast, if one governs it with no-mind, then one is the same as “tu.”

Guo Xiang, a Xuanxue scholar of the Western Jin who annotated the Zhuangzi, says: following what the ear hears and the eye sees, knowing to stop where one does not know, being able to rest where one cannot act, complying with one’s nature and not contending with external things—this is the Dao of ultimate softness. Therefore, raising what one ought to raise and holding what one ought to hold, not the slightest weight presses upon the body, and I myself expend no effort.

卢曰:强之与柔,二者易知也。人所以未知者何?即求胜之心多也,即遇不如己者未足为强,若遇敌於己者,则常危矣。以此心求胜一身一任天下也,常如徒役无时。自安若柔者,在己下者亦不欲胜之,况出乎己者耶遇不如己者未足为强,若遇敌於己者,则常危矣。以此心求胜一身一任天下也,常如徒役无时。自安若柔者,在己下者亦不欲胜之,况出乎己者耶?人谓不胜,而我乃自胜也;自任,故未尝有失也。《老子》曰:柔弱胜刚强。 范曰:济物而胜之,上也;以力而胜之,下也。故常胜之道曰柔,常不胜之道曰强。《老子》曰:天下莫柔弱於水,而攻坚强者,莫之能先。庄子於《外篇》论夔蛇之相怜,而曰指我则胜我,o我亦胜我。折大木,蜚大屋,惟我能也。盖明乎此。然柔之胜刚,弱之胜强,天下莫不知,而莫之能行。故积众小不胜为大胜者,惟圣人能之。 粥子曰:欲刚必以柔守之,欲强必以弱保之。 守柔不以求刚而自刚,保弱不以求强而自强。,惟圣人能之。 粥子曰:欲刚必以柔守之,欲强必以弱保之。 守柔不以求刚而自刚,保弱不以求强而自强。故刚强者,非欲之所能致也。
Interpretation

Lu Chongxuan (a Tang-dynasty Daoist priest) said: The principles of softness and strength are inherently easy to understand; the reason people cannot truly grasp them is that the desire to compete and win is too strong. Meeting someone inferior to oneself is not enough to demonstrate one’s strength; but encountering an evenly matched opponent often places one in danger. If one takes up the affairs of the world with such a competitive mind, one will be like a servant condemned to perpetual hard labor, with no time for rest. One who can rest at peace in softness and weakness does not even wish to surpass those beneath him, let alone those above him. In the eyes of others he seems not to have overcome the other, yet in reality he has overcome his own selfish desires; because he follows and accords with nature, he never suffers loss. Laozi says: “The soft and weak overcome the hard and strong.”

Fan (the commentator) said: To win by benefiting all things is superior; to win by subduing others with force is inferior. Thus it is the Way of softness that can always win, and the Way of strength that often cannot win. Laozi says: “Nothing under heaven is softer or weaker than water, yet in attacking the hard and strong, nothing can surpass it.” The Outer Chapters of Zhuangzi discuss the parable in which Kui (a legendary one-legged creature) and the snake sympathize with each other; its gist is that only this principle of softness can snap great trees and overturn great houses. This is probably what it intends to illustrate. That softness can overcome hardness and weakness can overcome strength is known to everyone under heaven, yet few truly put it into practice. Thus only the sage can accumulate many small “non-victories” and ultimately achieve a great victory.

Yuzi (traditionally attributed to Yuxiong, an early Zhou Daoist figure) says: If you wish to be hard, you must guard it with softness; if you wish to be strong, you must preserve it with weakness.

To keep to softness is not to seek hardness and thereby become hard oneself; to preserve weakness is not to seek strength and thereby become strong oneself. Therefore the realm of hardness and strength cannot be summoned through selfish desire.

积於柔必刚,积於弱必强。观其所积,以知祸福之乡。祸福生於所积也。强胜不若已,至於若己者刚;必有折也。柔胜出於己者,其力不可量。 范曰:柔者道之本,弱者道之用。故积於柔必刚,积於弱必强。观其所积,而祸福无不自己求之者。以强为用,而不知保之以弱,则所胜止於不己若者而已。以柔为用,则其终有以,积於弱必强。观其所积,而祸福无不自己求之者。以强为用,而不知保之以弱,则所胜止於不己若者而已。以柔为用,则其终有以胜刚,故所胜有出於己者焉。古之人所以贵夫处不争之地者,以其不争,天下莫能与之争。 老聃曰:兵强则灭。 王弼曰:物之所恶,故必不得终焉。 木强则折。强极则毁。柔弱者生之徒,坚强者死之徒。 卢曰:君子曰:强梁者,不得其死;好胜者,必遇其敌。积德累仁,柔之道也。 政和:积众小不胜为大胜者,唯圣人能之。老子曰天下莫柔弱於水,而攻坚强者莫之能先,以其无以易之也。盖有以易之累仁,柔之道也。
Interpretation

Those who accumulate softness and compliance will inevitably become hard and strong; those who accumulate suppleness and weakness will inevitably become powerful and flourishing. By observing what a person habitually accumulates, one can know whether he will meet misfortune or blessing, because misfortune and blessing are precisely produced by what is accumulated. Merely relying on aggressive strength to overcome those inferior to oneself does not count as true strength; one who can overcome those equal to or stronger than oneself is truly hard—but such a person will also inevitably encounter setbacks. If suppleness and weakness can overcome an opponent stronger than themselves, their power cannot be measured.

Mr. Fan says: Softness is the root of Dao (the Way, the fundamental principle governing the movement of all things), and weakness is the function of Dao. Therefore, accumulating softness and compliance will necessarily turn into hardness and strength; accumulating suppleness and weakness will necessarily turn into power and flourishing. Misfortune and blessing are never anything but what one has sought oneself. If one takes only aggressive strength as one’s method and does not understand how to preserve oneself through weakness, then those one can overcome are merely people weaker than oneself; if one takes softness as one’s method, one can ultimately overcome hardness and strength, and so can overcome those stronger than oneself. The reason the ancients valued dwelling in the place of non-contention is precisely that, because he does not contend with others, no one in the world can contend with him.

Lao Dan (that is, Laozi) says: When weapons are excessively strong, they move toward destruction.

Wang Bi (a Three Kingdoms scholar who annotated the Laozi) says: This is what all things detest, and therefore it certainly will not end well.

When trees are hard and rigid, they break; when strength reaches its extreme, it is destroyed. Suppleness and weakness belong to the category of life; hardness and strength belong to the category of death.

Mr. Lu says: Those who flaunt strength and are fierce and violent do not end well; those who love to win and contend for strength will surely meet their match. Accumulating virtue and benevolence is precisely the principle of softness.

Zhenghe (the commentator) says: Only a sage can accumulate small defeats and achieve a great victory. Laozi says that nothing in the world is softer and weaker than water, yet when it attacks hard and strong things, nothing can surpass it, because nothing can replace its softness. This too is the meaning of accumulating benevolence and virtue and taking softness as the Dao.

政和:积众小不胜为大胜者,唯圣人能之。老子曰天下莫柔弱於水,而攻坚强者莫之能先,以其无以易之也。盖有以易之,则徇人而失己,乌能胜物。唯无以易之,故万变而常一,物无得而胜之者。此之谓常胜之道。常胜之道曰柔,常不胜之道曰强,二者易知,而人未之知者,此《老子》所谓柔之胜刚,弱之胜强,天下莫不知,而莫之能行者是也。强,先不己若者;柔,先出於己者。先不已若者,至於若己,则殆矣。先出於己者,亡所殆矣者。盖道与胜强,天下莫不知,而莫之能行者是也。强,先不己若者;柔,先出於己者。先不已若者,至於若己,则殆矣。先出於己者,亡所殆矣者。盖道与世抗者,必遇其敌;懦弱谦下者,驰骋天下之至坚。正谓是也。以此胜一身若徒,以此任天下若徒者,谓由一身以达之天下,必若柔弱者之徒,乃能胜任也。为其不求胜物而自胜,不假任人而自任故也。抗兵相加哀者胜矣,故曰兵强则灭。拱把之桐,梓人皆知养之,强则伐而拱之矣。故曰木强则折。万物负阴而抱阳,冲以为和,阳以发生为德,阴以肃杀为事。方其肃杀,则冲丧矣。故曰柔弱者生之徒,坚强者死之徒。 范曰:传曰:刚强居下,柔弱处上。盖柔而胜刚,。方其肃杀,则冲丧矣。故曰柔弱者生之徒,坚强者死之徒。
Interpretation

Zhenghe Commentary:

Only the sage can accumulate countless small advantages and thereby achieve a great victory. Laozi says: “Nothing in the world is softer and weaker than water, yet in attacking the hard and strong, nothing can surpass it, because there is nothing that can take water’s place.” If there were something that could take its place, it would follow external things and lose itself—how then could it overcome the myriad things? It is precisely because it has no substitute that, through a thousand changes and ten thousand transformations, it remains always the same, and none of the myriad things can overcome it. This is the “way of constant victory.”

The way of constant victory lies in softness; the way of constant defeat lies in strength. These two points are very easy to understand, yet people do not put them into practice. This is exactly the meaning of what the Laozi says: “Softness can overcome hardness; weakness can overcome strength. No one in the world does not know this, yet no one is able to do it.”

Those who flaunt their strength always want first to overpower those inferior to themselves; those who are gentle and compliant always begin with themselves. Those who only wish to overpower those inferior to them are in danger once they meet an opponent comparable to themselves; those who begin with themselves are free from danger. This is roughly saying that one who opposes the world will surely meet an adversary, while one who is weak, yielding, and humble can instead move freely across the hardest things in the world. This is precisely the principle being expressed.

One who cultivates himself in this way can govern the world, because like a soft and weak thing he is able to bear the task. He does not seek to overcome external things, yet naturally overcomes them; he does not rely on others but bears things himself. When two armies face each other, the side with a compassionate heart instead wins—hence it is said, “When military force is strong, it moves toward destruction.” A young paulownia tree that one or two hands can encircle—carpenters all know to tend it carefully, and when it has grown large they cut it down for timber—hence it is said, “When a tree is hard and strong, it will break.”

The myriad things turn their backs to Yin and face Yang, and achieve harmony through Chong (the Qi of emptiness, harmony, and balance). The nature of Yang Qi is to grow and generate; the function of Yin Qi is to wither, kill, and store. When the time of withering and killing arrives, the harmonious Chong Qi disappears. Therefore it is said: the soft and weak are companions of life; the hard and strong are companions of death.

Fan Says:

The transmitted text says: “The hard and strong occupy the lower position; the soft and weak occupy the upper position.” This is probably speaking of the principle that softness can overcome hardness. The following text has the same meaning as what the Zhenghe commentary cites; it likewise discusses the principle that softness and weakness belong to life, while hardness and strength belong to death.

范曰:传曰:刚强居下,柔弱处上。盖柔而胜刚,弱而胜强,老氏之道术有在於是者。故《庄子》曰:以懦弱谦下为表。 状不必童童当作同而智童,智不必童而状童。圣人取童智而遗童状,众人近童状而疏童智。状与我童者,近而爱之;状与我异者,疏而畏之?有七尺之骸,手足之异,戴发含齿,倚而趣者,谓之人,而人未必无兽心,虽有兽心,以状而见亲矣。傅翼戴角,分牙布爪,仰飞伏走,谓之禽兽,而禽兽未必无人心。虽有人心。以状而见疏矣。庖牺角,分牙布爪,仰飞伏走,谓之禽兽,而禽兽未必无人心。虽有人心。以状而见疏矣。庖牺氏、女娲氏、神农氏、夏后氏,蛇身人面,牛首虎鼻,此有非人之状,而有大圣之德。 人形貌自有偶有与禽兽相似者,古诸圣人多有奇表。所谓蛇身人面,非被鳞臆行,无有四肢;牛首虎鼻,非戴角垂胡,曼頞解颔;亦如相书龟背、鹄步、鸢肩、鹰喙耳。 夏桀、殷纣、鲁桓、楚穆,状貌七窍,皆同於人,而有禽兽之心。而众人守一状以求至智,未可几也。 卢曰:夫异物之所亲者,神也,神去则父子之亲亦隔矣。故居恐怖而有禽兽之心。而众人守一状以求至智,未可几也。
Interpretation

Fan cited an ancient saying: the hard and strong are instead placed below, while the soft and weak are placed above. The soft can overcome the hard, and the weak can overcome the strong; herein lies the subtlety of Laozi’s Dao. Therefore the Zhuangzi says that one should make weakness, humility, and lowliness one’s outward demeanor.

A person’s outward appearance does not necessarily reflect their inner nature. The sage values inner wisdom and does not look at outward form; ordinary people draw close to those whose forms resemble their own and distance themselves from those whose forms differ. Those who resemble them, they feel close to and love; those who differ from them, they feel distant from and fear.

Consider this: a creature seven chi tall, with all four limbs complete, hair on its head, teeth in its mouth, and walking upright, is called “human,” yet a human may not lack a beast’s heart. Even with a beast’s heart, because its form resembles a human’s, it is still approached. Conversely, a creature with wings, horns on its head, sharp teeth and claws, able to fly and run, is called a “bird or beast,” yet birds and beasts may not lack a human heart. Even with a human heart, because its form does not resemble a human’s, it is still kept at a distance.

Fuxi, Nüwa, Shennong, and Xia Yu all had forms different from ordinary people—snake bodies with human faces, ox heads with tiger noses, and the like—yet all possessed the virtue of great sages. This shows that ancient sages often had extraordinary appearances. The so-called “snake body and human face” does not mean they truly had scales, hair growing on the chest, and no limbs; the so-called “ox head and tiger nose” does not mean they truly wore horns and had hanging flesh below the jaw. These expressions merely borrow terms from physiognomy manuals such as “turtle back,” “goose step,” “kite shoulders,” and “eagle beak” to describe their features.

Xia Jie, Yin Zhou, Duke Huan of Lu, and King Mu of Chu all had the seven apertures complete and were no different in appearance from ordinary people, yet they had hearts like birds and beasts. Thus it is clear that judging a person’s wisdom by appearance alone is unreliable.

Lu Chongxuan continued: creatures of different kinds draw close to one another through spiritual communion. Once the spirit departs, even between father and son, affection is cut off.

卢曰:夫异物之所亲者,神也,神去则父子之亲亦隔矣。故居恐怖之夜,与生物同宇,则不惧者,神有同也。处平常之宅,与死尸同室,则恐矣,神有异也。则彼死我生,犹是向时之形。一安一惧者,同类去而形非亲也。而人不知含生之物,神同形殊以为忧畏,乃以状貌同异以为亲疏者,惑矣。故《庄子》曰:物所齐有者为神,故神为养生之主也。 范曰:孟子曰:人之所异於禽兽者,几而希。庶民去之,君子存之。 夫索於形骸之外,则状有同者,智不必同也。索於形骸之内,则智有同者,状不必同也。存之。 夫索於形骸之外,则状有同者,智不必同也。索於形骸之内,则智有同者,状不必同也。是以古之人或有非人之状而有大圣之德,或状同於人而有禽兽之心,在夫存之去之之间而已。
Interpretation

Lu Chongxuan says: What makes creatures of different kinds draw close to one another is Shen (spirit). Once Shen departs, even the affection between father and son is severed. Therefore, on a frightening night, if one is in the same room with a living being, one is not afraid, because Shen communicates; but if one stays in an ordinary house and shares a room with a corpse, one becomes afraid, because the Shen is different. For the dead and the living, the bodily form is still as it was before; yet one is at peace and the other afraid, because the Shen of the same kind has departed, and the bodily form no longer draws near to people. People do not understand that all living things share the same Shen though their forms differ, and so they worry and fear them; they even use similarities and differences of outward appearance to distinguish closeness and distance—this is truly muddled. Hence the Zhuangzi says: “What all things share in common is Shen; therefore Shen is the master that nourishes life.”

Fan Zhen (Master Fan) says: Mencius said, “What makes humans different from birds and beasts is only that tiny bit of difference—very little. Ordinary people discard it, but the noble person preserves it.”

If one seeks from beyond the bodily frame, then those whose outward forms are the same may not have the same wisdom; if one seeks within the bodily frame, then those whose wisdom is the same may not have the same outward form. Preserve it (referring to inner wisdom).

If one seeks from beyond the bodily frame, then those whose outward forms are the same may not have the same wisdom; if one seeks within the bodily frame, then those whose wisdom is the same may not have the same outward form. Thus people in ancient times: some did not have human form but possessed the virtue of a great sage; some had human form but the heart of a bird or beast. The key lies merely in what is preserved and what is discarded.

Annotations:

Lu Chongxuan: a Tang-dynasty Daoist priest and one of the authors of the Four Commentaries on the Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing.

Zhuangzi: a Daoist classic; this sentence is quoted or paraphrased from related discussions in the “De Chong Fu” chapter of the Zhuangzi.

Fan Zhen: here “Fan” is one of the commentators; the original text does not give the full name.

Shen: here it refers to spirit, the mind/heart-spirit, the inner “numinous” aspect that stands in contrast to the bodily form.

黄帝与炎帝战于阪泉之野,帅熊、罴、狼、豹、躯、虎为前驱,雕、鹖、鹰、鸢为旗帜,此以力使禽兽者也。尧使夔典乐,击石拊石,百兽率舞,箫韶九成,凤凰来仪,此以声致禽兽者也。然则禽兽之心,奚为异人?形音与人异,而不知接之之道焉。圣人无所不知,无所不通,故得引而使之焉。禽兽之智有自然之心,奚为异人?形音与人异,而不知接之之道焉。圣人无所不知,无所不通,故得引而使之焉。禽兽之智有自然与人童者,其齐欲摄生,亦不假智於人也。牝牡相偶,母子相亲;避平依险,违寒就温;居则有群,行则有列;小者居内,壮者居外;饮则相携,食则鸣群。太古之时,则与人同处,与人并行。 德纯者,禽兽不忌也。 帝王之时,始惊骇散乱矣。逮於末世,隐伏逃窜,以避患害。 人有害物之心,物亦知避之也。
Interpretation

The Yellow Emperor and the Yan Emperor fought on the plain of Banquan. The Yellow Emperor had bears, pi (brown bears), wolves, leopards, chu (fierce beasts resembling wildcats), and tigers serve as the vanguard to clear the way, and he used eagles, he (a pugnacious bird of prey), hawks, and kites as banners. This was driving birds and beasts by force. Yao ordered the music officer Kui to strike the stone chimes and perform music; all the beasts danced to the rhythm, and when the Xiaoshao (ancient music) was performed nine times, phoenixes came and danced gracefully. This was influencing and transforming birds and beasts through music.

That being so, how are the hearts of birds and beasts different from those of humans? Their bodies and voices differ from those of humans, yet people do not understand the way to live with them. The sage knows all and penetrates all, and so can guide them and employ them in service. In the intelligence of birds and beasts there is also something that comes from natural disposition; they resemble humans in that they wish to preserve their lives, and they do so without borrowing human cleverness.

Males and females pair, mothers and children are affectionate toward each other; they avoid level ground and stay near steep and rugged places, avoid cold and move toward warmth; when they settle they gather in groups, when they travel they have order; the young stay on the inside, the strong guard the outer perimeter; when drinking they bring one another along, when seeking food they call and respond to one another. In remote antiquity, birds and beasts lived together with humans and walked alongside them.

A person of pure and substantial De (Virtue/Power) was not distrusted by birds and beasts.

When emperors and kings governed the world, birds and beasts began to be startled and scattered; by the final age, they withdrew into hiding and fled to avoid harm.

If a person harbors the intention to harm the myriad things, the myriad things will also know to avoid him.

范曰:可以力使,可以声致,则禽兽之心有自然与人同者。齐欲摄生,不假於人,则禽兽之智有自然与人伺者。至德之世,纯朴不残,故禽兽可系羁而游,鸟鹊。齐欲摄生,不假於人,则禽兽之智有自然与人伺者。至德之世,纯朴不残,故禽兽可系羁而游,鸟鹊之巢可攀援而窥也。迨夫后世,好智以乱天下,弓弩毕弋机变之智多,则鸟乱於上矣。削格罗落罝罘之智多,则兽乱於泽矣,故煛e之虫,肖翘之物,莫不失其性。 今东方介氏之国,其国人数数解六畜之语者,盖偏知之所得。 夫龟龙,甲鳞之宗;麟凤,毛羽之长;爰逮蜎飞蠕动,皆呜呼相闻,各有意趣,其相制御,岂异於人?但人不能解,因谓禽兽之声无有音章。是以穷理备智,则所通万途;因事偏达,偶识一条,《春秋左□氏传》曰:介葛卢闻牛鸣,曰是生四子,尽为牺矣。 太古神圣之人;备知万物情态,悉解异类音声。会而聚之,训而受之,同於人民,故先会鬼神魑魅, 禹朝群神於会稽是也。 次达八方人民,末聚禽兽虫蛾。百兽而受之,同於人民,故先会鬼神魑魅, 禹朝群神於会稽是也。 次达八方人民,末聚禽兽虫蛾。百兽率舞是也。言血气之类,心智不殊远也。神圣知其如此,故其所教训者无所遗逸焉。
Interpretation

The ancients believed that the hearts of birds and beasts have points of connection with human beings. They can be driven by human force and summoned by sounds, which shows that their inborn nature contains something akin to our own. Their intelligence, too, naturally has an aspect close to humans and capable of perceiving human intentions. In the age of the highest De (Virtue/Power), people were simple and pure and did not harm the myriad things; therefore birds and beasts could be tethered and led about for play, and bird nests could be climbed to and peered into, with no guardedness on either side.

In later ages people used cleverness to throw the world into disorder. The schemes for making crossbows, nets, and snares multiplied, and the birds in the sky suffered while the beasts in the marshes and wetlands suffered. As a result, crawling creatures, flying insects, and all the small winged things that can fly lost their original nature.

Today the people of the eastern state of Jie (an ancient state) can often understand the calls of the six domestic animals (horse, ox, sheep, chicken, dog, and pig). This is probably a skill acquired by specializing in one area, not a comprehensive understanding.

Turtles and dragons are the elders among shelled and scaled creatures; the qilin and the phoenix are the elders among the furry and feathered. Even down to the tiny insects that fly and wriggle, all can emit sounds to communicate with one another; each has its own inclination, and they also check and constrain one another—how are they any different from humans? It is only that humans cannot understand them, and so they say the sounds of birds and beasts are without order. Therefore, one who can exhaust the principles of things and fully possess wisdom can penetrate all paths; one who understands only by some accidental insight knows only a single path. As the Zuo Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals records: Jie Gelu (a man of the eastern state of Jie), on hearing an ox low, said, “This ox has given birth to four calves, all of which are to be used as sacrificial victims.”

The holy sages of high antiquity fully understood the conditions of the myriad things and knew the sounds of every kind of living being. They therefore gathered them together and instructed them, causing them to communicate with humans. First they assembled ghosts, spirits, and monstrous beings—as when Yu held audience with the assembled spirits at Kuaiji (in present-day Shaoxing, Zhejiang); next they brought the people of the eight directions into communication; and finally they gathered birds, beasts, insects, and moths, so that the hundred beasts danced in procession. This shows that among creatures of blood and Qi (vital energy), the minds are not far apart. The sages understood this, and so their civilizing instruction omitted no category of being.

卢曰:《春秋》介葛卢闻牛鸣,知生四牲牺,禹朝群神,舜百兽则其事也。 政和:先儒以童为同,当以为正也。至德之世,同乎无知,其德不离,同乎无欲,是谓素朴。故同与禽数居,族与万物并。禽兽可系羁而游,鸟鹊之巢可攀援而窥也。黄帝阪泉之役,帝尧声乐之致,盖以此乎?介葛卢闻牛鸣,成周之时,设官使养鸟兽而教,扰之且掌与之言,则悉解异类音声,会聚而训受之。犹之役,帝尧声乐之致,盖以此乎?介葛卢闻牛鸣,成周之时,设官使养鸟兽而教,扰之且掌与之言,则悉解异类音声,会聚而训受之。犹有见於后世者,《列子》叹淳朴之散,原道德之意,寓之於书,方且易机,变之衰,俗而跻之淳厚之域,故其言有及於此。范曰:《周官》d隶掌与兽言,则解六畜之语,固有遍知之所得者。然此喙鸣者,非工发隐亦不能与。是以伯翳综声於语鸟,葛卢辩音於鸣牛。 宋有狙公者, 好养猿猴者,因谓之狙公也。
Interpretation

Lu Chongxuan’s commentary: The Spring and Autumn Annals records that Jie Gelu heard an ox lowing and knew that it was to be used as a sacrificial offering. In the time of Great Yu, the assembled spirits came to court; under Shun, the hundred beasts danced to the music. All this speaks of the communication that can exist between humans and spirits and beasts.

Zhenghe’s commentary: Earlier Confucians understood the character tong (“child”) as tong (“same”), and this explanation is correct. People in the age of perfect virtue seemed devoid of knowledge, and so their virtue was not dispersed; they seemed devoid of desire, and this is what is called plain simplicity. Thus humans lived together with birds and beasts and were of one kindred with the myriad things. Birds and beasts could be led about on ropes for amusement, and one could climb up to peer into their nests. The Yellow Emperor commanded birds and beasts at the Battle of Banquan, and Yao transformed the myriad things through music; this was probably the same principle. Jie Gelu’s ability to understand an ox’s lowing also reflects conditions in the Zhou dynasty: at that time there were officials specifically appointed to rear birds and beasts and to train them, taming them so that they could even “converse” with them. Thus they understood the calls of every kind of animal, gathered them together, and instructed them. Traces of this survived in later ages. This is why the Liezi lamented the dissipation of pristine simplicity, investigated the original meaning of the Dao and De, and set it down in its book, hoping to reverse the decline of the age and restore it to honesty and simplicity; therefore its words touch on this matter.

Fan’s commentary: The Offices of Zhou records that officials in charge of taming beasts could converse with beasts and understood the languages of the six domestic animals, from which it is clear that there really were people who could understand such languages generally. Yet birds and beasts call with their mouths, and without those who have developed subtle techniques for penetrating the hidden, there would be no way to communicate with them. Thus Boyi could combine and interpret the sounds of bird calls and understand bird speech, and Jie Gelu could discern the tones of an ox’s lowing.

In the state of Song there was a man known as “Jugong,” the Monkey Keeper. The commentary explains that he received this name because he loved to raise monkeys.

爱狙,养之成群,能解狙之意。狙亦得公之心。损其家口,充狙之欲。俄而匮焉,将限其食。恐众狙之不驯於己也。驯,音唇。先诳之曰:与若芋,芋,栗也。朝三而暮四,足乎?众狙皆起而怒。俄而曰:与若芋,朝四暮三,足乎?众狙皆伏而喜。物之以能鄙相笼,皆犹此也。圣人以智笼,足乎?众狙皆起而怒。俄而曰:与若芋,朝四暮三,足乎?众狙皆伏而喜。物之以能鄙相笼,皆犹此也。圣人以智笼群愚,亦犹狙公之以智笼众狙也。名实不亏,使其喜怒哉。 卢曰:含识之物虽同有其神,而圆首方足人最为灵智耳。智之尤者为圣人为贤,才之大者为君王。圣人随才而任,各得其宜,无小无大,各当其分,既无弃人,亦无弃物,笼之以智,岂独众狙也? 政和:古之善为道者,非以明民,将以愚之。盖民可使由之,不可使知之。故善为道者,使由之而已。反其常,然道可载而与之俱,无所施其智巧焉。 范曰:古之人言诈者,必曰狙诈,以狙之为物,善伺而好诈也。故伐其巧,恃其便,貌非其情,可且而焉。
Interpretation

Original Text from Zhuangzi

The monkey keeper (jūgōng) loved monkeys and kept a large troop of them. He could understand the monkeys’ minds, and the monkeys also understood his. He reduced his own household’s rations to satisfy the monkeys’ desires. Before long his household supplies were exhausted, and he planned to limit the monkeys’ food. But he also feared that the troop would no longer obey him, so he first coaxed them, saying: “I will give you acorns (yu, that is, chestnuts)—three in the morning and four in the evening. Will that be enough?” All the monkeys rose up in anger. After a moment he said again: “I will give you acorns—four in the morning and three in the evening. Will that be enough?” All the monkeys crouched down and were delighted. In the world, things ensnare one another by talent and by base devices; all is like this. The sage uses wisdom to ensnare the ignorant multitude, just as the monkey keeper used cunning to ensnare the troop of monkeys. So long as neither name nor reality is impaired, why bother calculating the people’s anger and joy?

Lu Chongxuan’s Commentary

All sentient beings, though they all possess spiritual consciousness, are most intelligent and clever in the case of humans with round heads and square feet. Among them, those most outstanding in wisdom are the sages and worthies, while those greatest in capacity are rulers. The sage employs people according to their capacities, so that each obtains what is fitting for them; whether great or small, all can be content in their proper station. He abandons neither people nor things. Using wisdom to ensnare—how could this apply only to a troop of monkeys?

Zhenghe Commentary

In antiquity, those skilled in practicing the Dao did not seek to make the people enlightened, but rather to keep them simple and unknowing. Presumably, the people can be made to follow, but cannot be made to investigate. Therefore one who is skilled in practicing the Dao need only make the people follow. Cause the people to return to their original and genuine constant state, and the Great Dao can support them and walk alongside them; thus there will be no place for cleverness to operate.

Fan’s Commentary

When the ancients spoke of fraud, they invariably spoke of “monkey deceit” (jūzhà), because the macaque is an animal skilled at spying and fond of deception. Therefore one removes its cunning and makes use of its conveniences; where outward appearance and actual circumstances do not match, perhaps this can only be a temporary expedient.

范曰:古之人言诈者,必曰狙诈,以狙之为物,善伺而好诈也。故伐其巧,恃其便,貌非其情,可且而忌智,诈智只为智笼。故名实未亏,而喜怒为用。然则群狙见畜於狙公,反覆乎三四之间,曾不自悟者,岂非因其所好而笼之故欤。 纪消子为周宣王养斗鸡,十日而问:鸡可斗已乎?曰:未也,方虚骄而恃气。无实而自矜者。十日又问。曰:未也,犹应影向。接悟之速。十日又问。曰:未也;犹疾视而盛气。 常求敌而必己之胜。 十日又问。曰:几矣。鸡虽有鸣者,己无变矣。 彼命敌而我不应,忘胜负矣。 望之似木鸡矣,其德全矣。 至全者,更不似血气之类。 异鸡无敢应者,反走耳。 德全者,非但己无心,乃矣。 彼命敌而我不应,忘胜负矣。 望之似木鸡矣,其德全矣。 至全者,更不似血气之类。 异鸡无敢应者,反走耳。 德全者,非但己无心,乃使外物不生心。郭象日:养之以至於全者,犹无敌於外,况自全乎? 卢曰:恃气以自矜,非必胜之道也。应物疾速如影响者,为物所转未必自得也。疾视盛气者,机心未忘也。唯忘形神全,死生不知变者,斯乃无敌於外物也。 政和:善胜敌者不争,夫惟不争,故天下莫能与之争。盖欲静则平气,欲神则顺心,是谓不争之德也。若是者,其天守全,其神无邻,物奚自入焉?虽忤物而不慑,物亦莫之能伤;纯气之守,非智巧果敢之列也。是谓全德之人哉。 范曰:鸡人所畜而繇於大者,则所养不能无待矣。故虚憍而恃气於己,未能无所矜也,犹应响影於物,未能无所应也。疾视而盛气,则犹不能无欲胜之心焉。若夫鸡,虽有鸣者,已待矣。故虚憍而恃气於己,未能无所矜也,犹应响影於物,未能无所应也。疾视而盛气,则犹不能无欲胜之心焉。若夫鸡,虽有鸣者,已无变矣。望之似木鸡矣,则所养之全有物,无敢敌者。夫形全犹足以为尔,而况全德之人乎? 惠盎惠盎,惠施之孙,见宋康王。康王蹀足謦欬,疾言曰:寡人之所说者,勇有力也,不说为仁义者也。客将何以教寡人?惠盎对曰:臣有道於此,使人虽勇,刺之不入;虽有力,击之弗中。大王独无意邪?宋王曰:善。此寡人之所欲闻也。惠盎曰:夫刺之不入,击之不中,此犹辱也。臣有道於此,使人虽有勇,弗敢刺;虽有力,弗敢击。夫弗敢,非无其志之不中,此犹辱也。臣有道於此,使人虽有勇,弗敢刺;虽有力,弗敢击。夫弗敢,非无其志也。臣有道於此,使人本无其志也。夫无其志也,未有爱利之心者。臣有道於此,使天下丈夫女子,莫不欢然皆欲爱利之。此其贤於勇有力也,四累之上也。大王独无意耶? 处卿大夫士民之上,故言四累也。 宋王曰:此寡人之所欲得也。 卢曰:刺不入,击不中,一也。不敢刺,不敢击,二也。本无击之心,三也。使男女欢然爱利之,四也。如此,四重取其二者,何如耶?故宋王倾意欲闻之。 惠盎对曰:孔墨是已。 卢曰:此明智以齐物,崇教以化人,皆道之余事陟乎德者。 孔丘、墨翟无地而为君,无官而为长;天下丈夫女子,莫不延颈举踵而愿安利之。今大王,万乘之主也。诚有其志,则四境之内皆得其墨翟无地而为君,无官而为长;天下丈夫女子,莫不延颈举踵而愿安利之。今大王,万乘之主也。诚有其志,则四境之内皆得其利矣,其贤於孔墨也远矣。宋王无以应,惠盎趋而出。宋王谓左右曰:辩矣,客之以说服寡人也。 卢曰:此崇道以明德,垂迹以利人,众徒见孔墨之教传,岂知隐道以彰德?所以问津,不群於鸟兽,此其大旨也。 政和:圣人之於天下,神武不杀,而以慈为宝。故仁眇天下而无不怀,义眇天下而无不服。是谓常胜之道贤於勇有力者远矣。此天下所以爱利之也。言孔子之於天下,神武不杀,而以慈为宝。故仁眇天下而无不怀,义眇天下而无不服。是谓常胜之道贤於勇有力者远矣。此天下所以爱利之也。言孔子而遂与墨翟俱者,《庄子》论古之道术,百家众技各有所长。墨子於道,虽不该不遍,亦才士之有所长者也。 范曰:夫有爱利之心者,由未能使人忘我,而惠盎之言止此,特以对宋康而已。是篇必终於此言者,岂非常胜之道亦在是故欤? 冲虚至德真经四解卷之六竟 8-冲虚至德真经四解卷之七 冲虚至德真经四解卷之七 和光散人高守元集 周穆王 夫禀生受有谓之形,俛仰竟 8-冲虚至德真经四解卷之七 冲虚至德真经四解卷之七 和光散人高守元集 周穆王 夫禀生受有谓之形,俛仰变异谓之化。神之所交谓之梦,形之所接谓之觉。原其极也,同归虚伪。何者,生质根滞,百年乃终;化情枝浅,视瞬而灭。神道恍惚,若存若亡,形理显着,若诚若实。故洞监知生灭之理均,觉梦之涂一,虽万变交陈,未关神虑。愚惑者以显昧为成验迟速而致疑,故窃然而自私,以形骸为真宅。孰识生化之本归之於无物哉。卢曰:天地成器,无所不包,人生其中,但保其有。曾不知神为形主,无制於有。圣人所以养其本,愚者但知养其形,约以为生。贪生而不识生之主,形谢以为死,不知神识之长存。迷者为凡人,悟者通圣智,惑者多矣。故先说悟者以辩之。其本,愚者但知养其形,约以为生。贪生而不识生之主,形谢以为死,不知神识之长存。迷者为凡人,悟者通圣智,惑者多矣。故先说悟者以辩之。政和:道无真妄,物有彼是。犹之梦觉,自生纷错,唯大圣知之。通为一。范曰:滞於有者,一毫成隔;悟於无者,万法同宗。体道之人,浮游乎万物之祖,造形而上,与化人同游悟理之微,与造物默契一死生之理,齐梦觉之途。虽存亡得失,哀乐好恶,一无所知。虽天地四方,水火寒暑,一无所别。太虚无物,还性宅之,自然,又孰弊弊以物为事? 周穆王时,西极之国有化人来,化幻人也。入水火,贯金石,反山川,移城邑,乘虚不坠,触实不碍。千变万化,不可穷极。既已变物之形,又且易人之虑。 能使人暂忘其宿所知识。 政和:知变化之道者,其知神之所为乎?水火之所不能害且易人之虑。 能使人暂忘其宿所知识。 政和:知变化之道者,其知神之所为乎?水火之所不能害,金石之所不能踬,高下一体,虚实两忘,千变万化,不可穷极,则亦神矣。然神者,妙万物而不可测也。变物之形,易人之虑,是特穷数达变,因形移易者尔。谓之化人以此。 穆王敬之若神,事之若君。 卢曰:凡人之虑,不过嗜欲、忧憎、客利、仁义矣。化人今反其真,故云易也。化人者,应物之身也,穷圣极智,应用无方,千变万化,未始有极者也。 推露寝以居之,引三牲以进之,选女乐以娱之。化人以为王之宫室卑陋而不可处,王之厨馔腥蝼而不可飨,蝼蛄臭也。王之嫔御膻恶而不可亲。 卢曰:陋王之宫室,腥王之,王之厨馔腥蝼而不可飨,蝼蛄臭也。王之嫔御膻恶而不可亲。 卢曰:陋王之宫室,腥王之厨膳,膻王嫔御者,明化人不贵声色滋味及居处也。 穆王乃为之改筑,土木之功,赭垩之色,无遗巧焉。五府为虚,而台始成。其高千仞,临终南之上,号曰中天之台。简郑卫之处子娥媌靡曼者, 娥媌,妖好也。靡曼,柔弱也。 施芳泽,正蛾眉,设笄珥笄,首饰,珥,瑱也。衣阿锡,阿,细谷。锡,细布。曳齐纸纨,齐,名纨所出也。粉白黛黑,佩玉环。杂芷若芷若,香草。以满之,充满台馆。奏《承云》、《六莹》、《九韶》、《晨露》以乐之。 《承云》,黄帝乐;《六莹》,帝环。杂芷若芷若,香草。以满之,充满台馆。奏《承云》、《六莹》、《九韶》、《晨露》以乐之。 《承云》,黄帝乐;《六莹》,帝喾乐;《九韶》舜乐;《晨露》汤乐。 月月献玉衣,旦旦荐玉食。言其珍异。化人犹不舍然,不得已而临之。 卢曰:王不达其意,更崇饰之。化人犹不释然,明心不在此之也。 政和:世之所美者为神奇,所恶者为臭腐。神奇臭腐,迭相为化,则美恶奚辩?化人以王之宫室、厨馔、嫔御为不可,而必改筑简择,然后临之,是未能忘美恶之情者也。故穆 王钦之,特若神而已辩?化人以王之宫室、厨馔、嫔御为不可,而必改筑简择,然后临之,是未能忘美恶之情者也。故穆 王钦之,特若神而已。 范曰:孔子曰:不与化为人,安能化人。所谓化人者,殆亦化为人者耶?故水火、金石,可入而贯,山川城邑,可反而移,以无有入无间,不坠於虚;以无厚入有间,不碍於实。千变万化,不可穷极,无体也。有以变物之形,无思也。有以易人之虑,谓之化人,固宜如此。穆王乃尽钦事之道,推露寝以居之,曾不知其卑陋而不可处也;引三牲以进之,曾不知腥蝼而不可飨也形,无思也。有以易人之虑,谓之化人,固宜如此。穆王乃尽钦事之道,推露寝以居之,曾不知其卑陋而不可处也;引三牲以进之,曾不知腥蝼而不可飨也;选女乐以娱之,曾不知膻恶而不可亲也。於是筑中天之台,简郑卫之态,奏云韶之乐,献以玉衣,荐以玉食,曾不知其犹不舍然也。不得已而临。是直随其遇而安一宅,而寓於不得已焉耳。 居亡几何,谒王同游。王执化人之袪,袪,衣袖也。腾而上者,中天乃止。暨及化人之宫,化人之宫构以金银,络以珠玉,出云雨之上,而不知下之据,望之若屯云焉。耳目所观听,鼻口所纳尝,皆非人间之有。王实以为清都紫微,钧天广乐,帝之所居。 清都,紫,望之若屯云焉。耳目所观听,鼻口所纳尝,皆非人间之有。王实以为清都紫微,钧天广乐,帝之所居。 清都,紫微,天帝之所居也。传纪云:秦穆公疾不知人,既寤,曰:我之帝所,甚乐,与百神游钧天,广乐九奏万舞,不类三代之乐,其声动心。一说云赵简子亦然也。 王俯而视之,其宫榭若累块积苏焉。王自以居数十年不思其国也。 所谓易人之虑也。 卢曰:中天,至灵之心也。以穆王未能顿忘其嗜欲,故化以宫室之盛,夺其所重之心焉。 化人复谒王同游,所及之处,仰不见日月,俯不见河海。光影所照,王目眩不能得视;音响所来,王耳乱不能得听。百骸六藏,悸而不凝,意迷精丧,请化人求还。 太虚恍惚之域,固非俗人之所涉。心目乱惑,自然之来,王耳乱不能得听。百骸六藏,悸而不凝,意迷精丧,请化人求还。 太虚恍惚之域,固非俗人之所涉。心目乱惑,自然之数也。 政和:言王实以为清都、紫微、钧天、广乐,帝之所居,则明其非也。构以金银,络以珠玉,观听尝纳,皆非人间之所有,而王至於不思其国,其可乐如此。其所及之处,仰不见日月,俯不见河海,目不能视,耳不能听,而王意迷精丧,请化人求还,其不乐如此。此之谓变物之形而易人之虑。 化人移之,移,犹推也。王若,请化人求还,其不乐如此。此之谓变物之形而易人之虑。 化人移之,移,犹推也。王若陨虚焉。陨,坠也。 卢曰:至极之理,即化人所及之处也。万象都尽也,何日月、江海之可存?众昏皆除也,何光景之能有此?俗形所不能止,常心所未曾知,常恋未忘,故请归也。 既寤,所坐犹向者之处,侍御犹向者之人。视其前,财酒未清,肴未昲扶贵反。王问所从来,左右曰:王默存耳。由此穆王自失者三月而复。更问化人, 问其形不移之意。 卢曰:亡攀缘之虑,入寂照之方,一念之间,万代所不及。至人之域,岂更别有方圣?故酒未清,肴未昲。左右见王之默坐,而都无所往来,王不及。至人之域,岂更别有方圣?故酒未清,肴未昲。左右见王之默坐,而都无所往来,王因坐忘三月,不敢问矣。 化人曰:吾与王神游也,形奚动哉? 所谓神者,不疾而速,不行而至。以近事喻之,假寐一昔,所梦或百年之事,所见或绝域之物。其在觉也,俛仰之须臾,再抚六合之外,邪想淫念,犹得如此,况神心独运,不假形器,圆通玄照,寂然凝虚者乎? 且曩之所居,奚异王之宫?曩之所游,奚异王之圃?王间恒,疑暂亡。 彼之与此,俱非真物。习其常存,疑其暂亡者,心之惑也。 变化之极,徐疾之间,可尽模哉? 变化不可穷极,徐疾理亦无间,欲以智恒,疑暂亡。 彼之与此,俱非真物。习其常存,疑其暂亡者,心之惑也。 变化之极,徐疾之间,可尽模哉? 变化不可穷极,徐疾理亦无间,欲以智寻象模,未可测。 卢曰:夫神之异形,此益明矣。王但闲习常见,故有疑於暂亡。若夫至道之人,常亡其形者,复何疑哉?神之变化徐疾,不可尽言。 政和:神心恍惚,经纬万方,则神游者其疾。俛仰之间,再抚四海之外,形不必动而心与之俱矣。世之人以常有者为真,以常无者为妄,故闲习於常存,而置疑於暂亡。着有弃空,蔽於一曲,不知彼之与此俱非真也以常有者为真,以常无者为妄,故闲习於常存,而置疑於暂亡。着有弃空,蔽於一曲,不知彼之与此俱非真也。明乎此,则曩之所居,奚异王之宫?曩之所游,奚异王之圃? 范曰:化人之宫,构以金银,络以珠玉,出云雨之上,而不知下之据,望之若屯云焉。其视夫中天之台为如何哉?耳目所视听,鼻口所纳尝,皆非人间之有,其视夫郑卫之态、云韶之乐、献玉衣而荐玉食者为何如哉?王实以为清都,紫微,钧天广乐,帝之所居,曾不知变物之形、易人之虑有若是也。故俯而视之,其宫榭若累块积苏焉,则变物之形可知。王自以居十数年不思其国也,则易人之虑可知。虽然止是耳矣,由非其至。故化人复谒王同游,所及之处,仰不见日月,则非所谓上见光者。俯不见河海,则非所谓下为土者。光影所照,王目眩不能得视,以其未能见晓故,仰不见日月,则非所谓上见光者。俯不见河海,则非所谓下为土者。光影所照,王目眩不能得视,以其未能见晓故耳者。音响所来,王耳乱不能得听,以其未能闻和故耳。百骸六藏,悸而不凝,意迷精丧,请化人求还,怖其径庭,惕然震悸,殆将自涯而反矣。已而既寤,则所坐犹向者之处,侍御犹向者之人,视其前,则酒未清,肴未昲。王问其所从来,曾不知其默存於此,而形未尝动也。故以是为神游焉。惟神也,不疾而速,不行而至,立乎不测,游乎无有,俛仰而再抚四海,恍惚而经纬万方,又岂形之所能累耶?审造乎是,则变化之极,徐疾之间,在我而已。化神也,不疾而速,不行而至,立乎不测,游乎无有,俛仰而再抚四海,恍惚而经纬万方,又岂形之所能累耶?审造乎是,则变化之极,徐疾之间,在我而已。化人之宫,夫何远之有? 王大悦,不恤国事,不乐臣妾, 感至言,故遗世事之治乱,忘君臣之尊卑也。 肆意远游。 卢曰:《庄子》之论夫贵道之人,遗天下而不顾,是犹尘垢糠□将犹陶铸尧舜也。孰肯以物为事乎?且声色嗜欲之溺也,岂有道之所耽玩乎?故王大悦其道,不

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2