中文 · EN

《道德真经取善集(李霖)》

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 5 volumes 117,931 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真经取善集(李霖)》 (Taixuan 太玄部, 5 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 55 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

Contents (5 volumes)

Vol. 1

道德真经取善集(李霖) > 经名:道德真经取善集(李霖),收录于《中华道藏》道德真经。 经名:道德真经取善集。金李霖编撰。十二卷。其自序谓『今取诸家之善,断以一己之善』,故名曰《取善集》。卷前有刘尤升序。底本出处:《正统道藏》洞神部玉诀类。 道德真经取善集序
Interpretation

The Collection of Selected Insights on the True Classic of the Dao and Its Virtue is a twelve-volume commentary on the Classic of the Dao and Its Virtue compiled by Li Lin of the Jin dynasty. Li Lin said that he had selected the strengths of various commentators’ interpretations and assessed them in light of his own views; for this reason, he titled the work Collection of Selected Insights. It is prefaced by a preface written by Liu Yousheng. The text is based on the Yujue category of the Dongshen Cavern section in the Zhengtong Daoist Canon.

老氏当商之季,悯其世道衰微由乎文弊,於是思复太古之纯,载畅玄风,以激其流俗,至於轻蔑仁义,屏斥礼学,盖韭过直无以矫枉,仲尼所以钦服。既见,则叹其犹龙。惟圣知圣,始云其然也。关尹睹紫气之瑞,识其真人度关,虔诚叩请,方垂至言。议者咸谓五经浩浩不如二篇之约,良有以也。庄周、列御寇羽翼其教,亦犹鼓大浪於沧溟,耸奇峻於乔岳,此尚拟其边而未尽其意,要在忘言而后识其指归也。汉文、景间,治尚清静,世治隆平,率自曹参,宗溟,耸奇峻於乔岳,此尚拟其边而未尽其意,要在忘言而后识其指归也。汉文、景间,治尚清静,世治隆平,率自曹参,宗盖公之训,足知道德范世之验,果不虚云惜乎。晋朝流为浮诞,王衍清谈,反坏淳风。阮籍猖狂,又隳名教。失其本而循其末,可不哀哉。赖隋之王仲淹,深识其故,以谓虚玄长而晋室削,非老、庄之罪,以其用之不善也。唐韩愈犹讥其小仁义如坐井观天。呜呼,愈负其才而昧於道,是亦聋盲於心,而不知太山雷霆可以惊其耳而骇其视也。一言以为不智,每贻君子之叹息焉。笃信之士,代不乏人,各随其意,为之注解,殆数十家,不惟观览之烦,抑掊集之不易。饶阳李霖,字宗傅,性善恬淡,自幼至老,终身确然,研精於五千之文,所谓知坚高之可慕,忘钻仰之为劳,会聚诸家之淡,自幼至老,终身确然,研精於五千之文,所谓知坚高之可慕,忘钻仰之为劳,会聚诸家之长,并叔己见,成六卷。譬若八音不同,均适於耳。五味各异,皆可於口。庶广其见,而博其知,以斯而资同道,为功岂小补哉。王宾,乃先生之旧友也,赏其勤而成其志,命工缕板,俾好事者免缮写之劳,推而用心,可不谓之仁乎。时大定壬辰重午日,河间刘允升序。
Interpretation

Laozi lived near the end of the Shang dynasty. Seeing social customs grow ever more corrupt, he believed excessive ornamentation was to blame. He therefore sought to restore the simplicity of ancient times and to proclaim the mysterious Dao, hoping in this way to correct the customs of his age. At times, his teachings seem to belittle benevolence and righteousness and to reject the study of ritual. Perhaps he pressed too hard in correcting what had gone astray. Confucius therefore revered him. After meeting Laozi, Confucius remarked that Laozi was as unfathomable as a dragon. Only a sage can understand another sage; that is why Confucius spoke as he did.

When Guan Yin, the official who guarded Hangu Pass, witnessed the auspicious purple Qi rising in the east, he recognized that a realized person was about to leave through the pass. He earnestly asked Laozi to leave behind his teachings, and Laozi then set down his profound words. Commentators all say that the vast Five Classics cannot compare with the concise two-part Daode Jing. This claim has good reason behind it. Zhuang Zhou and Lie Yukou developed Laozi’s teachings further, as if raising great waves upon the sea and adding extraordinary peaks to a mountain range. Yet what they said touched only the edges of the Dao and did not exhaust its meaning. To grasp its ultimate purport, one must go beyond words themselves.

During the reigns of Emperor Wen and Emperor Jing of the Han, governance prized quietude and Wuwei (non-action), and society was peaceful and prosperous. This was largely a continuation of Cao Can’s practice of following the teachings of Gai Gong. It is ample proof that the study of Dao and De can indeed guide the customs of society; it is no empty talk. Sadly, by the Jin dynasty, Daoist thought had degenerated into extravagant and baseless speculation. Wang Yan’s abstract talk undermined simple customs, while Ruan Ji’s unrestrained conduct damaged the traditional ethical order. To abandon the root and chase after branches is truly lamentable.

Fortunately, Wang Zhongyan of the Sui dynasty understood the reasons behind this. He held that the Jin dynasty’s decline after its devotion to the profound and the mysterious was not the fault of Laozi and Zhuangzi, but of later people who used their teachings poorly. Han Yu of the Tang dynasty, however, ridiculed Laozi, claiming that he made too little of benevolence and righteousness, like someone sitting in a well and looking at the sky. Alas, Han Yu, for all his talent, failed to understand the truth; it was as though his heart were deaf and blind. Even principles as towering as Mount Tai and admonitions as thundering as a storm could not make him truly see or hear. He judged Laozi unwise in a single sentence, and this has often left gentlemen sighing.

In every age, many people have devoted themselves to Laozi’s teachings, and dozens have written commentaries. This makes it difficult for readers to choose among them and difficult, too, to gather and organize them. Li Lin of Raoyang, whose courtesy name was Zongfu, was naturally calm and untroubled. From childhood into old age, he remained devoted to studying the five thousand characters of the Daode Jing. He understood the depth and value of its teachings and willingly devoted his efforts to studying them. He collected the strengths of various commentators and added his own insights, compiling them into six scrolls. It is like the eight kinds of musical instruments, each with its own tone, blending into pleasing music; or the five flavors, each distinct yet all agreeable to the palate. May this book broaden its readers’ knowledge, deepen their understanding, and help those who share its aims. Its benefit should be considerable.

Wang Bin was an old friend of Li Lin. He admired Li’s diligence and helped him fulfill his wish, so he arranged to have the book printed from woodblocks, sparing interested readers the labor of copying it out. In extending this kindness to others, does he not deserve to be called benevolent?

On the fifth day of the fifth month in the Renchen year of the Dading era, Liu Yunsheng of Hejian wrote this preface.

物之其由者道也。道之在我者德也。道妙无形,变化不测。德显有体,同焉皆德。自其异者,视之则有两名。自有同者,视之其实一致。末学之人言道者,每不及德。言德者,同及於道。此道德所以分裂不见其纯全也。犹龙上圣,视之则有两名。自有同者,视之其实一致。末学之人言道者,每不及德。言德者,同及於道。此道德所以分裂不见其纯全也。犹龙上圣,当商末世,叹性命之烂漫,悯道德之衰微,着书九九篇,以明玄玄之妙。言不踰於五千,义实贯於三教。内则修心养命,外则治国安民,为群言之首,万物之宗。大无不该,细无不徧,其辞简,其义丰,洋洋乎大哉。自有书籍已来,未有如斯经之妙也。后之解者甚多,得其全者至寡。各随见,互有得失,通性者造全神之妙道,於命或有未至。达命者得养生之要诀,於甚多,得其全者至寡。各随见,互有得失,通性者造全神之妙道,於命或有未至。达命者得养生之要诀,於性或有未尽。殊不知性命兼全,道德一致尔。霖自幼及壮,谩诵玄言,以待有司之问。今已老矣,欲讨深义,以修自己之真。自度耄荒难测圣意,今取诸家之善,断以一己之善,非以启迪后学,切要便於检阅,目之曰《取善集》,览者幸勿诮焉。 饶阳居士李霖序。 2-道德真经取善集卷一
Interpretation

The source of the generation and activity of all things is called the Dao (the Way). When the Dao is embodied in me, it is called De (Virtue/Power). The Dao is mysterious and formless, its transformations difficult to fathom. De, by contrast, appears in concrete workings. The distinct De inherent in each thing all arise from the Dao. Viewed in their differences, Dao and De seem to have two names; viewed in their common ground, their substance is one.

Those with only a shallow understanding who speak of the Dao often fail to speak of De; those who speak of De, however, usually touch on the Dao as well. When Dao and De are treated as separate, their original wholeness and purity cannot be seen.

The supreme sage, mysterious and unfathomable as a dragon—Laozi—lived at the end of the Shang dynasty. Moved by the growing disorder in the principles of human nature and life, and saddened by the decline of morality, he composed the eighty-one chapters of the Dao De Jing, setting forth its profound and subtle teachings. The entire work contains no more than five thousand characters, yet its principles encompass the Three Teachings: Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism. Within, it speaks of cultivating the mind and nourishing life; without, it speaks of governing the state and bringing peace to the people. It is the guiding framework of many teachings and the foundation of all things. No principle, whether great or minute, is left out. Its wording is concise, its meaning rich, and its scope vast and profound. Since books first came into being, none has been as mysterious and subtle as this classic.

Many later writers have annotated it, but few have fully explained the principles of the whole work. Each interprets it according to personal understanding, and so each is bound to grasp some things and miss others. Those who understand Xing (nature) may reach the state of preserving the spirit and realizing the wondrous Dao, yet may not fully comprehend Ming (life-destiny). Those who understand Ming have grasped the essentials of nourishing life, yet may still not fully understand Xing. They fail to recognize that Xing and Ming should be cultivated together, and that Dao and De are one in essence.

I, Li Lin, from childhood into adulthood, recited these mysterious sayings casually, treating them only as material for the civil service examinations. Now, in old age, I wish to seek their deeper meaning and use it to cultivate my own true nature. Knowing that age has clouded my mind and that I cannot fully fathom the sage’s intent, I have selected what is best in the annotations of various authors and made my own judgments about what to accept. This is not chiefly intended to enlighten later students, but to make the text easier to consult. For this reason, I have titled the work Collected Selections of the Best. I hope readers will kindly forgive it.

Preface by Li Lin, Layman of Raoyang.

Collected Selections of the Best from the True Classic of the Dao and Its De, Volume One.

道德真经取善集卷一 宋饶阳居士李霖集 御注:道者,人之所共由。德者,心之所自得。道者,亘万世而无弊。德者,充一性而常存。老子当周之末,道降而德衰,故着书九九篇,以明道德之常,而谓之经。其辞简,其旨远,学者当默识而深造之。 道可道章第一 道可道,非常道。名可名,非常名。 严遵曰:可道之道,道德彰而非自然也。今之行者,昼远,学者当默识而深造之。 道可道章第一 道可道,非常道。名可名,非常名。 严遵曰:可道之道,道德彰而非自然也。今之行者,昼不操烛,为日明也。夫日明者,不道之道常也。操烛者,可道之道彰也。夫着於竹帛,镂於金石,可传於人者,可道之道也。若乃可传而不可受,可得而不可见,自本自根,未有天地,自古以固存,神鬼神帝,生天生地者,常道之道也。五千文之蕴,发挥自此数言,实谓玄之又玄,神之又神也。王元泽曰:名生於实,实有形数,形数既具,衰坏随之,其可常乎。惟体此不常,乃真常也。
Interpretation

The “Dao” spoken of in the Daodejing, if it can be made clear in words and fixed in writing, is not the eternal and unchanging “constant Dao.” A name that can be spoken is likewise not an eternal and unchanging “constant name.”

Yan Zun says that the Dao one can describe is the form in which Dao and De become manifest; it is not the Dao that exists naturally, without form or trace. For example, when people travel by day, they need no lamp, because sunlight already lights the way. The state in which sunlight shines without any need for deliberate explanation is like the constant Dao, which needs no words. Lighting a path with a lamp, by contrast, is like the Dao made manifest and available for description. Whatever is recorded on bamboo slips and silk, carved into metal or stone, and passed on to others belongs to the Dao that can be spoken.

As for the Dao that can be communicated but not truly taken in, that can be experienced but not directly seen: it is its own foundation, existed before Heaven and Earth, and has remained constant since ancient times. It makes the spirits and the Heavenly Emperor manifest their powers, and brings Heaven and Earth into being. This is the constant Dao. The entire five thousand words of the Daodejing unfold from these opening lines; what they expound is the Dao’s principle, at once profound and more profound, mysterious and more mysterious.

Wang Yuanze says that names arise from things themselves. Once things have form and quantity, they can also change and decay—how could they remain forever unchanged? Only by understanding this state of being unfixed and impermanent can one grasp what is truly constant.

首递道之一字,大道之道也。下言可道之字,言道之道也。夫大道虚寂,玄理幽深,不可言道,当以默契,故心困焉不能知,口辟焉不能议,在人灵府之自悟尔。虽道之一字,亦不可言也。若默而不言,众人由之而不知,大道虚寂,玄理幽深,不可言道,当以默契,故心困焉不能知,口辟焉不能议,在人灵府之自悟尔。虽道之一字,亦不可言也。若默而不言,众人由之而不知,故圣人不得已而强名曰道。 既云为道,有言有说,代废代兴,非真常之道也。其可道者,莫非道也,而非道之常也。惟其不可道,而后可常耳。今夫仁义礼智,可道之不可常。如此惟其不可道,然后在仁为仁,在义为义,在礼为礼,在智为智,彼皆不常而道不变,故常不可道之能常,如此常道者,夫仁义礼智,可道之不可常。如此惟其不可道,然后在仁为仁,在义为义,在礼为礼,在智为智,彼皆不常而道不变,故常不可道之能常,如此常道者,自然而然,随感应变,接物不穷,不可以言传,不可以智索,但体冥造化,含光藏辉,无为而无不为,默通其极尔。 无名,天地之始。有名,万物之母。 温公曰:天地,有形之大者也。其始必因於无,故名天地之始曰无。万物以形相生,其生必因於有,故名万物之母曰有。
Interpretation

The first “Dao” at the beginning refers to the boundless Great Dao. The “Dao” in “that can be spoken” refers to a Dao that can be expressed in words and described. The Great Dao is empty, still, and unfathomably deep; its mysterious principles are too profound to grasp and cannot be explained in words. They can only be understood inwardly. The human mind cannot fully know it, and language cannot adequately discuss it. Each person must realize it for themselves through inner clarity. Even the word “Dao” cannot fully express the Great Dao.

Yet if a sage remained silent, people might live in accordance with the Great Dao without knowing that it existed. So, having no choice, the sage reluctantly gave it the name “Dao.”

Any principle that can be described in words rises and falls as the times change; it is not the eternal, unchanging Great Dao. Any Dao that can be explained is not the eternal, unchanging substance of the Great Dao. Only a Dao that cannot be exhausted by words can endure forever.

Principles such as benevolence, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom can be described, but they cannot remain eternally unchanged as the Great Dao does. The Great Dao cannot be spoken of; it is what makes benevolence benevolence, righteousness righteousness, propriety propriety, and wisdom wisdom. These particular norms change with the times and circumstances, while the Great Dao itself does not. The constant Dao operates naturally, responds to changes in the world, and meets the needs of the myriad things without end. It cannot be passed on through words or pursued through clever reasoning. One can only bring oneself into accord with the natural transformations, keep one’s light within and avoid showing an edge. It may seem to be Wuwei (non-action), yet nothing remains unaccomplished. Its utmost reaches can be understood only through silent, inward experience.

The nameless is the beginning of Heaven and Earth; the named is the source of the myriad things.

Sima Guang said: “Heaven and Earth are the greatest of things that have form. The beginning of Heaven and Earth must have arisen from ‘nonbeing,’ so the beginning of Heaven and Earth is called ‘nonbeing.’ The myriad things generate one another through their forms, and their generation must be grounded in ‘being,’ so the source of the myriad things is called ‘being.’”

吕吉甫曰:无名者道也。而天地所自而始也。故曰无名,天地之始。太初有无无,有无名。无无则一亦不可得,无名则一之所起。有一而未形,则所谓天地之始是也。既已谓之一,且得无名乎。此物得之无名,天地之始。太初有无无,有无名。无无则一亦不可得,无名则一之所起。有一而未形,则所谓天地之始是也。既已谓之一,且得无名乎。此物得之以生,而谓之德也。则所谓有名,万物之母。而万物得一以生者是也。 无名谓道也。道常无名,生育天地,故为天地之始,乃道之妙也。有名谓天地也。天覆地载,万物方立,故为万物之母,乃道之徼也。天地有形位,是有名也。万物母者,天地含气,生育万物,长大成熟,如母养子。 常无,欲以观其妙。常有,欲以观其徼。 苏子由曰:自其无名,形而为天地。天地位而名始立矣。自其有名,播而为万物。万物育而名不可胜载矣。故无名者,道之体。而有名者,道之用也。圣人体道以为天下用,入於众有播而为万物。万物育而名不可胜载矣。故无名者,道之体。而有名者,道之用也。圣人体道以为天下用,入於众有而常无,将以观其妙也。体其至无而常有,将以观其徼也。若夫行於其徼而不知其妙,则粗而不神矣。留於其妙而不知其徼,则精而不通矣。
Interpretation

Lü Jifu says: “‘Nameless’ refers to the Dao. It is the source from which Heaven and Earth begin, which is why it is said, ‘Namelessness is the beginning of Heaven and Earth.’ In the time before the Great Beginning, even ‘nothingness’ did not yet exist, nor was there any notion of ‘namelessness.’ Since nothing had yet appeared, one could not even speak of ‘the One’; ‘namelessness’ is the source from which everything first comes into being. The One appeared, but had not yet taken on any concrete form. This is what is meant by ‘the beginning of Heaven and Earth.’ Since it is already called the One, how can it be said to be entirely nameless? All things receive life from this nameless source. The power that generates all things is called De (Virtue/Power). Thus, ‘the named’ is the mother of all things. The saying that all things receive life from the One means precisely this.

“‘Nameless’ refers to the Dao. The Dao is eternally without form or name; it gives birth to Heaven and Earth and is therefore their beginning. This expresses the Dao’s subtle, elusive aspect. ‘The named’ refers to Heaven and Earth. Each has its own form and place, and all things take shape through them. Heaven and Earth are therefore the mother of all things. This expresses the Dao in its manifest aspect. Because Heaven and Earth have form and place, they belong to ‘the named.’ Heaven and Earth are called the mother of all things because they bear the Qi of Yin-Yang and give birth to all things, enabling them to grow and mature, just as a mother raises her child.

“‘Constantly without desire, one observes its subtlety; constantly with desire, one observes its limits.’ This means: one continually observes the Dao’s subtlety through emptiness, and continually observes its boundaries and workings through the manifest world of formed things. ‘Limits’ refers to the range and traces of the Dao as it becomes manifest.

“Su Ziyou says: The Dao manifests from a nameless, formless state as Heaven and Earth. Only after Heaven and Earth each take their place do names begin to arise. Heaven and Earth then spread out and generate all things. Once all things multiply and grow, their names become too numerous to count. Thus, namelessness is the Dao’s essence, while the named is the Dao’s function.

“The sage understands the Dao and puts this understanding to work for the world. He enters into concrete things, yet is always able to remain grounded in emptiness and so observe the Dao’s subtlety. He recognizes the Dao’s ultimate emptiness, yet is always able to apply it in practice and so observe the scope and workings of its manifestation. If one acts only among manifest things without understanding their subtle root, one becomes shallow and lacks refinement. If one remains only with subtle principles without understanding how they work in practice, one becomes overly abstruse and unable to engage with the world.”

记曰:感物而动,性之欲也。欲者离静之动,任耳目以视听,劳心虑以思为。无欲,则静於以观天地之始,所谓妙也。故曰:常无欲可名於小。妙,则精而小也。有欲,则动於以观万物之母,所谓徼也。故曰:万物归焉而不知主,可名於大矣。徼则赢而大也。无欲之人,可以见道之精妙也。有欲之人,但见其道之粗徼而已。 此两者同出而异名,同谓之玄。 温公曰:玄者,非有非无,微妙之极也。 两者,谓有欲无欲也。同出者,同出人心也。而异名者,其名各异也。其名异其实未尝异,其实未玄者,非有非无,微妙之极也。 两者,谓有欲无欲也。同出者,同出人心也。而异名者,其名各异也。其名异其实未尝异,其实未尝异,则有欲之与无欲同谓之玄也。玄之为色黑,与赤同乎一也。天之色玄,阴与阳同乎一也。两者同谓之玄,玄能阴能阳故也。 玄之又玄,众妙之门。 御注:《素问》曰:玄生神。《易》妙而小之谓玄。玄者天之色,色之所色者彰矣。而色色者未尝显玄之。又玄所谓色色者也。玄妙之理,万物俱有,天之所以运,地之所以处,人之所以灵,百物之所以昌,皆妙也。而皆出於玄。故曰众妙之门。
Interpretation

When things stir the heart, desires arise; this is human nature. Desire draws people away from stillness, toward the sights and sounds that appeal to the eyes and ears, and consumes their thoughts in planning and action. Without desire, the heart can grow still and observe the beginnings of all things under Heaven and Earth. This is called “subtlety.” Thus, one who often remains in a state without desire may be called “small”; here, “small” means fine and delicate. When desire is present, thoughts begin to stir, and one observes the source from which all things arise. This is called “manifestation”—the boundaries and traces through which things appear. All things return to the Dao, yet no one knows what governs it; therefore, the Dao may be called “great.” “Manifestation” points to what appears outwardly and extends broadly. One without desire can perceive the Dao’s subtle, mysterious aspect; one with desire can see only its coarser, more visible traces.

These two ways of observing both arise from the human heart, though they have different names. Together, they may be called “mystery.”

Wen Gong says: “Mystery” is neither being nor nonbeing; it is a state of utmost subtlety.

The “two” here refer to desire and the absence of desire. “Arising from the same source” means that both come from the human heart; “having different names” means that their names are distinct. Though their names differ, their essence may not: desire and the absence of desire can ultimately both be called “mystery.” Mystery is also like black among the colors: it belongs to the same category of color as red. Heaven appears in a deep, shadowy hue, within which Yin and Yang are united. Desire and the absence of desire are both called “mystery” because mystery contains both aspects of Yin and Yang.

“Mystery upon mystery” is the gateway to the many wonders.

The Imperial Commentary quotes the Suwen, part of the classic of Chinese medicine, the Huangdi Neijing: “Mystery gives rise to wondrous transformations.” The Changes calls a state that is subtle and minute “mystery.” Mystery is the color of Heaven: when color appears, people see its form, but may not perceive the hidden source behind it. “Mystery upon mystery” names the root that gives all things their forms, yet remains hidden and difficult to see. All things possess a mysterious principle: Heaven’s movement, Earth’s stillness, human spiritual awareness, and the flourishing growth of the myriad things all belong to this wonder. Since all of it emerges from mystery, mystery is called the gateway to the many wonders.

《易》曰:一阴一阳之谓道,阴阳皆原於一。一者道所生也。玄者阴与於玄。故曰众妙之门。 《易》曰:一阴一阳之谓道,阴阳皆原於一。一者道所生也。玄者阴与阳同乎一也。又玄者道也。众妙者谓万物之妙也。万物皆有妙理,而皆出於道,故曰众妙之门。此章言真常之道,悟者自得,不可名言,同观徼妙,斯可以造真常之道矣。太上以此首章,总一经之意,明大道之本,谓玄之又玄也。 天下皆知章第二 天下皆知美之为美,斯恶已。皆知善之为善,斯不善已。 御注:道无异相,孰为美恶。性本一致,孰为善否。有美也,恶为之对。故曰:天下皆知美之为美,斯恶已。有善也,不善为之对。故曰:皆知善之为善,斯不善已。世之所美者,为神奇。所恶者,为臭腐。神奇复化为臭腐,臭腐复化为神奇,则美与恶奚辫。昔之所是,今或非神奇。所恶者,为臭腐。神奇复化为臭腐,臭腐复化为神奇,则美与恶奚辫。昔之所是,今或非之。今之所弃,后或用之。则善与不善奚择。圣人体真无而常有,即妙用而常无,美恶善否,盖将简之而弗得,尚何恶与不善之能累哉。 王元泽曰:恶与不善,美善之随也。当其美善之时,盖已恶且不善矣。俟其随而后悟,则亦悟之晚也。
Interpretation

The Yijing says, “The changes of Yin and Yang together are called the Dao.” Yin and Yang both have their source in the One, and the One is born of the Dao. What is called the “Mysterious” is the union of Yin and Yang with the One; at a deeper level, the Mysterious is the Dao itself. “The myriad subtle wonders” refers to the subtle principles that belong to each thing. Since the subtle principles of all things come from the Dao, the Dao is called “the gateway to the myriad wonders.” This chapter speaks of the constant, true Dao: those who understand it can experience it for themselves, but cannot express it fully in words. By observing both the manifest and the hidden aspects of things, one can draw close to the constant, true Dao. The Most High (Laozi) placed this chapter at the beginning of the book to sum up the meaning of the entire classic and show that the foundation of the Great Dao lies in “the Mysterious upon the Mysterious.”

Chapter Two: All Under Heaven Knows

When all under heaven knows beauty as beauty, ugliness appears alongside it. When all know goodness as goodness, evil appears alongside it.

Imperial Commentary: The Dao itself has no distinct form—how could there be beauty or ugliness? Human nature is originally one—how could there be goodness or evil? Once beauty exists, ugliness becomes its counterpart; once goodness exists, evil becomes its counterpart. People of the world regard strange and marvelous things as beautiful, and foul, decayed things as ugly. Yet the marvelous can turn into the foul, and the foul can turn into the marvelous. How, then, can beauty and ugliness be clearly distinguished? What was once considered right may now be considered wrong; what is discarded today may be taken up again in the future. In view of this, how should goodness and evil be chosen between? The sage experiences the “true emptiness” that is nonetheless ever-present, and can remain in constant emptiness amid wondrous activity. Distinctions such as beauty and ugliness, good and evil, cannot be fixed and separated as one might wish. How, then, could the sage be entangled by ugliness or evil?

Wang Yuanze says: Ugliness and evil arise alongside beauty and goodness. Even when something seems beautiful and good, ugliness and evil are already contained within it. By the time they come to light and one realizes this, it is already too late.

美恶生於妄情,善否均於失性。美者人情所好也。若知美之为美,是心有所美也。心有所美,於心为恙,斯恶已。若河伯欣然,自喜以天下之美为尽在已,不免望洋向若而叹,几是矣。善者人之可欲也。若知善之为善,是性有所欲也。性有所欲,是离道以善,斯不善已。若伯夷见名之可欲,饿於首阳之下,均为失性,几是也。性有所欲,是离道以善,斯不善已。若伯夷见名之可欲,饿於首阳之下,均为失性,几是矣。盖道之美者,至美也。至美无美,淡乎无味。庄子曰:淡然无极,众美从之,道之善者上善也。上善忘善,万善皆备。又曰:去善而自善矣。此章道通为一,恐人着於美善,不悟真常,故以此篇次之,与《庄子齐物论》相似。 故有无之相生,难易之相成,长短之相形,高下之相倾,音声之相和,前后之相随。
Interpretation

Beauty and ugliness are distinguished through deluded thoughts and emotions; good and bad, too, become opposites when one departs from one’s original nature. Beauty is what people’s feelings delight in. To insist on what counts as beautiful shows that the mind already favors something. Once the mind takes sides, that fixation becomes a burden within it, giving rise to what is called ugliness.

The River Earl was once pleased with himself, believing that all the world’s beautiful sights were his to behold. Later, when he saw the great sea, he lamented to the sea god Ruo how limited his understanding had been. This is a similar example.

Goodness is what people consider worth pursuing. To insist on what counts as good shows that one’s original nature already desires something. Once desire arises, pursuing goodness can lead one away from the Dao, and this too becomes bad. Boyi regarded fame as something worth pursuing, and in the end starved to death beneath Mount Shouyang. He, too, departed from his original nature. This is another similar example.

The beauty of the Great Dao is true beauty. The realm of supreme beauty does not cling to beauty; it is calm and without flavor. Zhuangzi said, “Calm and boundless, it is followed by every kind of beauty.” The goodness of the Great Dao is supreme goodness. Supreme goodness does not cling to goodness, and so it contains every kind of good. Zhuangzi also said, “Let go of goodness, and goodness arises of itself.” This chapter treats the Great Dao as uniting all things into one. It warns that people may cling to beauty and goodness and fail to understand the constant Dao. For this reason, it appears here, and its meaning is close to that of “Discussion on Making All Things Equal” in the Zhuangzi.

Thus, being and nonbeing give rise to each other; difficult and easy bring each other about; long and short define each other; high and low depend on each other; tone and sound harmonize with each other; and before and after follow each other.

御注:太易未判,万象同体,两仪既生,物物为对。此六对者,韦变所交,百虑所生,殊涂所起,世之人所以陷溺而不能自出者也。无动而生有,有复归无,故曰有无之相生。有涉险之难,则知行地之易,故曰难易之相成。长短之相形,若尺寸是也。高下之相倾,若山泽是也。声举而响应,故曰音声之相和。形动而则知行地之易,故曰难易之相成。长短之相形,若尺寸是也。高下之相倾,若山泽是也。声举而响应,故曰音声之相和。形动而影随,故曰前后之相随。阴阳之运,四时之行,万物之理,俄造而有,倏化而无。其难也,若有为以经世。其易也,若无为而适己。性长非所断,性短非所续,天之自高,地之自下,鼓宫而宫动,鼓角而角应,春先而夏从,长先而少从,对待之境,虽皆道之所寓,而去道也远矣。 温公曰:凡事有形迹者,必不可齐。不齐则争,争则乱,乱则穷,故圣人不贵。 是以圣人处无为之事,行不言之教。 顾欢曰:圣人因天任物,无所造。为心常凝,静於前。美善处而无争,故不为六境之所倾夺。
Interpretation

In the time of Great Change (Taiyi), when Heaven, Earth, and the myriad things had not yet differentiated, all phenomena were one undivided whole. Once the Two Principles (Yin-Yang) emerged, the myriad things stood in relation to one another. These six pairs of opposites are the source of the interwoven changes of the world, the many thoughts that arise, and the branching of different paths. People become immersed in them and find it hard to break free.

Being comes forth from nonbeing, and being returns to nonbeing; thus being and nonbeing give rise to each other. Only after experiencing danger do we know how easy it is to walk on level ground; thus difficulty and ease bring each other about. Long and short reveal their difference through one another, like measurements. High and low set each other off, like mountains and marshes. When a sound is struck, an echo follows; thus tones and sounds answer one another. When a body moves, its shadow follows; thus front and back accompany one another.

Yin-Yang moves, the seasons take turns, and the myriad things transform: sometimes they arise suddenly, sometimes they vanish in an instant. When affairs are difficult, it seems that one must act to bring order to the world; when they are easy, it seems that Wuwei (non-action) allows one to be at ease. What is naturally long should not be cut short, and what is naturally short should not be lengthened. Heaven is naturally high, and Earth naturally low. Strike the gong note, and the gong note answers; strike the jiao note, and the jiao note answers. Spring comes first, and summer follows; the elder comes before the younger. These opposing circumstances all embody the Dao, yet they have already strayed far from it.

Sima Guang said: “Whatever has a visible form cannot be entirely the same as everything else. Difference leads to contention, contention to disorder, and disorder to trouble. That is why the sage does not value such things.”

Therefore, the sage conducts affairs through Wuwei and teaches without relying on words.

Gu Huan said: “The sage follows the way of Heaven and lets the myriad things develop naturally, without deliberate contrivance. His mind remains settled and still. He lets what is good and beautiful rest naturally in its proper place, without contention. Thus he is not drawn along or unsettled by these six kinds of opposition.”

为则有成亏,言则有当愆,曾未免乎累。是以圣人处事,以无为行教,以不言而事,以之济教以之行,而吾心寂然,未始有言为之累,天。是以圣人处事,以无为行教,以不言而事,以之济教以之行,而吾心寂然,未始有言为之累,天下亦因得以反常复朴。夫唯无累,故虽寄形阴阳之间,而造化不能移,彼六对者,乌能扰之哉。《经》曰:不言之教,无为之益,天下希及之。 万物作而不辞, 御注:万物动作,随感而应。若鉴对形,妍丑毕现。若谷应声,美恶皆赴,无所辞也。 今计物之数不止於万,而曰万物者,以数之多者云也。作谓动作也。万物动作,圣人各尽其性,不辞谢而逆止,以吾心空然无所去取故也。苟怀去取之虑,则物之万态美恶多矣,乌能不辞哉。 生而不有,为而不恃,功成不居。 纂微曰:万物自生,卓然独化,不为己有。群品营为,各适其性,不恃己德。功成事遂,道洽於物,心游姑射之山,不居万民之上,此圣人之全德也。 万物自生,各极其高大。万物自事遂,道洽於物,心游姑射之山,不居万民之上,此圣人之全德也。 万物自生,各极其高大。万物自为,各正其性命。圣人归功於物,不以三事为累,故曰:功成不居,有我则居,居则迁矣。帝尧成功,而自视缺然。
Interpretation

Whenever one acts, there will be success and failure; whenever one speaks, one may speak aptly or make a mistake. Thus one is inevitably entangled by one’s words and deeds. The sage conducts affairs by using Wuwei (non-action) to guide and teach, and by using silence to accomplish things. Through Wuwei and silence, the sage brings teaching to completion and puts the Great Dao into practice. The mind remains still and at ease, never entangled by speech or action. The people of the world can therefore return to the constant Dao and recover their simplicity. Because the sage is free of entanglement, even while dwelling amid the transformations of Yin-Yang, he is not changed by creation and transformation. How, then, could things that stand in opposition to one another disturb him? The Daodejing (Classic of the Way and Its Virtue) says: “The teaching without words and the benefit of Wuwei—few in the world are able to attain them.”

All things arise, and the sage does not reject them.

The Imperial Commentary says: When all things move, the sage responds in keeping with their unfolding. It is like a mirror reflecting forms: beauty and ugliness alike appear. It is also like a valley answering sounds: pleasing and unpleasant sounds alike carry through. Neither the mirror nor the valley rejects anything.

“All things” here does not mean only ten thousand kinds of things; “ten thousand” is used to signify a great multitude. “Arise” means to come forth and move. Each thing moves according to itself, and the sage lets each fully express its nature, neither turning it away nor obstructing it. This is because the sage’s mind is empty, clear, and impartial, with no inclination to choose or reject. If the mind holds on to preferences, how could it avoid rejecting things amid the myriad forms of the world and their differences in beauty and ugliness?

He lets all things grow without claiming them as his own, acts without relying on his own power, and accomplishes his work without taking credit.

The Zuanwei says: All things grow naturally, each changing independently; they do not do so in order to become the sage’s possessions. Each pursues its own activity in accordance with its nature, without relying on the sage’s virtue. When the work is complete and affairs are settled, the Great Dao extends throughout all things. The sage’s spirit roams Mount Gushe, the legendary mountain of immortals, and he does not place himself above the people. This is the sage’s fully realized virtue.

All things grow naturally, each attaining fullness and flourishing. Each carries its own work to completion, allowing the Great Dao to reach all things. The sage does not place himself above the people. Things grow and act of themselves, each setting its own nature and life in order. The sage attributes the achievements to all things and does not let the three matters mentioned above become a source of entanglement. This is why it is said, “When the work is done, he does not claim it.” With a sense of self, one takes credit; once one takes credit, one’s position also changes. Emperor Yao had accomplished great works, yet still felt that he had fallen short.

夫唯不居,是以不去。 苏子由曰:圣人居於贫贱而无贫贱之忧,居於富贵而无富贵之累,此所谓不居也。我且不居,彼尚何从去哉。此则居之至也。《鸿烈》曰:楚将子发攻蔡,踰之。宣王郊迎,列田百顷封之执圭。子发辞不受,曰:治国立政,诸侯入宾,此君之德也。发号施令,师未合而敌遁,此将军之威也。兵阵战而胜敌者,此庶人之力也。夫乘民之功劳,而取其爵禄,非仁义之道也。故弗受。故曰:功成不居,夫惟不居,是以不去。此章欲体真常之道,忘美恶,齐善否,不为六对之所迁,唯圣人知其然。故处事以无为,行教以不言。故曰:功成不居,夫惟不居,是以不去。此章欲体真常之道,忘美恶,齐善否,不为六对之所迁,唯圣人知其然。故处事以无为,行教以不言,归功於物而不居,道常在我而不去也。 不尚贤章第三 不尚贤,使民不争。 温公曰:贤之不可不尚,人皆知之。至其末流之弊,则争名而常乱。故老子矫之,欲人尚其实,不尚其名。贤者,出众之称。在上者别而尚之,崇以爵位,旌以车服,故民夸企外慕殉名而不息,能无争乎。盖圣人未尝不用贤也。使贤不肖各当其分,因任而已,特不崇尚耳。庄子曰:举贤则民相轧。 不贵难得之货,使民不为盗。
Interpretation

Only by not claiming merit for oneself can merit be kept from departing.

Su Ziyou said: A sage may live in poverty and low status without being troubled by them; may live in wealth and honor without being entangled by them. This is “not dwelling”: not treating external circumstances as something on which to rely. If one is not attached to these things, how could they leave? This is the highest state of dwelling in what one has attained.

The Honglie (another name for the Huainanzi) records that after the Chu general Zifa captured Cai, King Xuan of Chu went out to the suburbs to welcome him, granted him a hundred qing of land, and bestowed on him the rank of Zhigui, a high title in Chu. Zifa declined, saying, “Governing the state and establishing its laws so that the other lords come to pay allegiance are the king’s virtue. Issuing commands so that the enemy flees before the army has even fought is the general’s authority. Forming ranks, engaging the enemy, and defeating them are the soldiers’ strength. To claim a title and stipend for oneself on the strength of the people’s achievements does not accord with the Way of benevolence and righteousness.” He therefore refused the reward.

Thus, one may accomplish great things without claiming them as one’s own. Precisely because one does not claim them, they do not depart. This chapter speaks of recognizing the constant Dao: not clinging to distinctions such as beautiful and ugly, good and evil, and not being swayed by the many forms of opposition and differentiation. Only the sage understands this. Therefore, the sage acts through Wuwei (non-action), teaches without words, and attributes achievements to the myriad things without claiming them. The Dao then remains within, never departing.

Chapter Three: Do Not Exalt the Worthy

If worthy and capable people are not deliberately exalted, the people will not compete with one another.

Wen Gong said: Worthy and capable people should be given important responsibilities; everyone understands this. But when the practice reaches its excesses and becomes rife with abuses, it turns into a scramble for reputation and often leads to disorder. Laozi therefore offered a corrective, hoping people would value genuine ability and virtue rather than exalt empty reputations. “Worthy” refers to people whose abilities surpass the ordinary. If those in high positions deliberately distinguish and exalt the worthy, granting them high rank and generous stipends, and rewarding them with carriages and fine clothing, the people will yearn for these outward signs of reputation and compete to pursue them. How could they not contend? The sage does not refuse to employ the worthy; rather, the worthy and the unworthy are each allowed to occupy their proper place and are appointed according to their abilities. The sage simply does not deliberately elevate or advertise the worthy. Zhuangzi said, “When the worthy are promoted, the people will jostle one another.”

If hard-to-obtain precious goods are not prized, the people will not steal.

御注:尚贤则多知,至於天下大骇,儒墨毕起。贵货则多欲,至於正昼为盗,曰中穴陆。不尚贤则民各安其性命之分,而无所夸跂,故曰:不争不贵货,则至於天下大骇,儒墨毕起。贵货则多欲,至於正昼为盗,曰中穴陆。不尚贤则民各安其性命之分,而无所夸跂,故曰:不争不贵货,则民各安其性命之情,而无所觊觎,故不为盗。 金玉者,难得之货。在上者贵而宝之,取金於山,求珠於渊,则民病於无有,求货而无厌,必至於为盗。盖圣人未尝弃财货也,使民耕而食,织而衣,足衣食而已。特不贵难得者尔,故民各安其性命之情,而不为盗。孔子曰:苟子之不欲,虽赏之不窃。 不见可欲,使心不乱。 御注:人之有欲,次性命之情以争之,而攘夺诞谩,无所不至。值夷见名之可欲,饿於首阳之下。盗跖见利之可欲,暴於东陵之上。其热焦火,其寒凝冰,故其心则愤乱偾骄,而不可系道。至於圣人者,不就利,不违害,不乐寿,不哀天,不荣通,不丑穷,则,暴於东陵之上。其热焦火,其寒凝冰,故其心则愤乱偾骄,而不可系道。至於圣人者,不就利,不违害,不乐寿,不哀天,不荣通,不丑穷,则孰为可欲。欲虑不萌,吾心湛然,有感斯应,止而无所碍,动而无所逐也,孰能乱之。
Interpretation

Esteeming the worthy leads people to compete with one another in ability and intelligence, until the world falls into disorder and teachings such as those of the Confucians and Mohists arise in profusion. Valuing possessions increases people’s desires; some may even turn to theft in broad daylight, digging holes to steal goods at noon. If the worthy are not held up for admiration, people can keep to their own proper roles and stop boasting and competing for superiority. If precious possessions are not prized, people can rest content with their nature, feel no covetousness, and therefore have no cause to become thieves.

Gold and jade are possessions that are difficult to obtain. When those in high positions regard them as precious, they will mine for gold in the mountains and seek pearls in the depths. The people then suffer from being unable to obtain such things. Since the pursuit of wealth has no point of satisfaction, they may eventually turn to theft. The sage does not reject all possessions. Rather, people are allowed to farm for food and weave for clothing, and to be content when they have enough to eat and wear. What they should not prize are rare treasures. Thus, people can rest content with their nature and do not become thieves. Confucius said, “If you yourself have no greed, then even if you reward others for stealing, they will not steal.”

When people are not shown things that might stir their greed, their minds are not disturbed.

Once people’s desires exceed what their nature and livelihood require, they will rob and deceive others in pursuit of what they want, stopping at nothing. When Bo Yi and Shu Qi, worthy men from the end of the Yin dynasty, saw fame and honor as attainable, they chose to starve to death beneath Mount Shouyang. When Dao Zhi, a legendary robber, saw profit within reach, he ran rampant around Dongling. In the pursuit of desire, people grow hot as if consumed by fire, or cold as if frozen by ice and snow. Resentment, agitation, and arrogance then arise in their hearts, leaving them unable to accord with the Dao.

The sage neither pursues profit nor deliberately avoids misfortune; neither clings to long life nor grieves over Heaven’s mandate; neither takes pride in prominence nor feels ashamed of hardship. What, then, could he insist on pursuing? When desires and deliberations do not arise, the heart remains clear and still. It responds when things happen, is unobstructed in stillness, and is not drawn along by desire in action. Who, then, could disturb his heart?

君子之所欲者贤也。小人之折欲者货也。既无尚贤之迹,不求难得之货,是无可见之欲,则民心不惑乱也。傅奕《音义》曰:古本作使,民心不乱。 是以圣人之治, 河上公曰:圣人治国,与治身同也。 虚其心,实其腹, 曹道冲曰:心虚白则神留而道存,腹充实则精全而寿长。心有所择,虚其心则无贤之可尚治身同也。 虚其心,实其腹, 曹道冲曰:心虚白则神留而道存,腹充实则精全而寿长。心有所择,虚其心则无贤之可尚,腹有所容,实其腹则无欲之可贪。 弱其志,强其骨。 御注:志强则或殉名而不息,或逐货而无厌,或伐其功,或矜其能,去道益远。圣人之志,每自下也,而人高之。每自后也,而人先之。知其雄,守其雌,知其荣,守其辱,是之谓弱其志。不坏之相,若广成子千二百岁而形未尝衰,是之谓强其骨。 刘仲平曰:虚心弱志,所以养神。腹实骨强,所以荣,守其辱,是之谓弱其志。不坏之相,若广成子千二百岁而形未尝衰,是之谓强其骨。 刘仲平曰:虚心弱志,所以养神。腹实骨强,所以啬精。 志者心之所之,守道则志弱。骨者髓之府,髓满则骨强。一说虚心则实腹,弱志则骨强。一说虚心则弱志,腹实则骨强。 常使民无知无欲。
Interpretation

The exemplary person seeks virtue, while the petty person devotes himself to acquiring wealth. If people do not praise the worthy and capable or pursue rare and valuable goods, their desires will not come to the surface, and the people’s hearts will not be thrown into confusion. Fu Yi’s Yinyi records that an old edition has “cause” in place of “make,” meaning “cause the people’s hearts not to be confused.”

Therefore, when the sage governs the state,

Heshang Gong says that the principles by which the sage governs the state are the same as those by which he cultivates himself.

He makes people’s minds empty and still, and their bellies full.

Cao Daochong says that when the mind is empty, still, and clear, the spirit and Qi can settle, and the Dao can be preserved. When the belly is full, Jing and Qi can be safeguarded, and life can be prolonged. From the perspective of self-cultivation, if the mind harbors no preferences and remains empty and still, there is no particular praise of the worthy and capable. If the belly has room and is filled, there is no craving for more.

He makes people’s ambitions restrained and their sinews and bones strong.

The Imperial Commentary says that when ambition is excessive, some people ceaselessly strive for fame, some pursue wealth with insatiable greed, and others boast of their achievements and display their abilities. All of this takes them farther and farther from the Dao. The sage always places himself below others, and they esteem him; he always puts himself last, and they let him take the lead. To know the value of strength yet remain content with weakness, and to know the value of honor yet remain content with lowliness and disgrace—this is to restrain one’s ambition. For the body to remain vigorous over a long life, as in the case of Guangchengzi, who lived to the age of twelve hundred without bodily decline, is to have strong sinews and bones.

Liu Zhongping says that an empty, still mind and restrained ambition nurture the spirit, while a full belly and strong sinews and bones preserve Jing and Qi. Here, “ambition” refers to what the heart tends toward; those who abide by the Dao do not let their ambition stir recklessly. “Bones” are where the marrow resides: when the marrow is abundant, the sinews and bones are strong. Another interpretation holds that an empty, still mind makes the belly full, and restrained ambition strengthens the sinews and bones. Yet another holds that an empty, still mind restrains ambition, while a full belly strengthens the sinews and bones.

He constantly keeps the people from becoming absorbed in clever knowledge or inflaming their craving for more.

御注:庄子曰:同乎无知,其德不离。同乎无欲,是谓素朴。素朴而民性得矣。圣人之治,务使民得其性而已。多知以残性命之分,多欲以汨性命之情,名曰治之,乱孰甚焉。故常使民无知无欲。 王元泽曰:知则妄见,欲则外求,二者既除,性情定矣。自不尚贤,虚心弱志而化之,使民性命之情,名曰治之,乱孰甚焉。故常使民无知无欲。 王元泽曰:知则妄见,欲则外求,二者既除,性情定矣。自不尚贤,虚心弱志而化之,使民无争尚之知。自不贵货,实腹强骨而化之,使民无贪求之欲。 使夫知者不敢为也。 吕吉甫曰:智者知贤非上之所尚,而货非上之所贵,而为之非所利也,故不敢为也。 为无为,则无不治矣。 舒王曰:有为无所为,无为无不为,圣人为无为,则无不治矣。
Interpretation

Zhuangzi said: Keep people in a state undisturbed by delusive knowledge, and their De will not become scattered. Let them have few desires, and this is called simplicity. When simplicity is preserved, the people’s nature can find its proper place. In governing the world, the sage need only let the people retain their own nature. Excessive knowledge harms people’s inborn nature and their proper way of life; excessive desire disrupts their nature and emotions. If this is called good governance, what could be more chaotic? Therefore, the people should be kept from having too much clever knowledge and too many grasping desires.

Wang Yuanzhe said: Clever understanding can easily give rise to false views; desire leads people to seek things outside themselves. When both are removed, one’s nature and feelings can settle. The ruler does not exalt the reputation of the worthy and capable. Instead, by quieting the people’s minds and weakening their urge to outdo one another, the ruler teaches them not to compete for admiration. Nor does the ruler prize material goods. Instead, by teaching the people to fill their bellies and strengthen their bones, the ruler keeps them from developing covetous desires.

Let those who think themselves clever not dare to act recklessly.

Lü Jifu said: Those with clever skills understand that the ruler does not exalt the reputation of the worthy and capable, nor prize wealth. Reckless action brings them no benefit, so they dare not act recklessly.

Govern through Wuwei (non-action), and nothing will be left unguided.

Prince Shu said: Act without fixating on any particular aim; appear to do nothing, yet there is nothing that cannot be accomplished. The sage governs through Wuwei, and so there is nothing in the world that is not well governed.

此章言圣人体道无为而治也。不尚贤,不贵货,虚心实腹,弱志强骨,是圣人体道治身而无为也。使民不争而同乎无知,使民不盗而同乎无欲,则无不治也。《经》曰:道常无为而无不为,侯王若能守,万物将自化,无为而治者,虞舜之所以为帝。垂拱而治者,周武之所以为王。故曰:帝王无曰:道常无为而无不为,侯王若能守,万物将自化,无为而治者,虞舜之所以为帝。垂拱而治者,周武之所以为王。故曰:帝王无为而天下功。三篇统论,首篇言道可道,夫可道之道,非真常之道也。真常之道,离言说,超形名,悟者自得。能悟之者,忘美恶,齐善否,故以天下皆知次之。既不为二境回换,则是非美恶不藏於胸中,故以不尚贤次之。不尚贤,不贵货,则方寸之地虚矣。虚则腹实,此精神内守道德之极致也。学者精此三篇,则经之妙旨,斯过半矣。 道冲章第四 道冲,而用之或似不盈。 御注:道有情有信,故有用。无为无形,故不盈。 冲者,中也。道之用,抑高举下,损有余补不足,无适而不得其中也。道之:道有情有信,故有用。无为无形,故不盈。 冲者,中也。道之用,抑高举下,损有余补不足,无适而不得其中也。道之体,虚而不盈,充塞而无外,赡足万物而未尝有,故曰或似不盈。
Interpretation

This chapter explains that sages follow the Dao (the Way), governing the state through Wuwei (non-action) and tending to their own cultivation. They do not exalt those deemed worthy or value possessions. They quiet the mind and strengthen the body, lessen desires and fortify the sinews and bones. This is the sage’s Wuwei method of cultivating the self in accord with the Dao. When the people are led away from contention and return to a simple, unknowing state, and away from theft and back from greed, the world can be brought to order.

The Dao De Jing says: “The Dao constantly follows its own nature, yet nothing is left undone. If lords and kings can hold fast to this principle, all things will transform of themselves.” Governing the world through Wuwei was how Shun became emperor; ruling with ease, without burdensome interference, and bringing peace throughout the realm was how King Wu of Zhou established his royal enterprise. Thus, when emperors practice Wuwei, the world’s work can be accomplished.

The first three chapters together express a single idea. The first says, “The Dao that can be spoken of,” meaning that a Dao expressed in words is not the eternal, unchanging Dao. The true, eternal Dao lies beyond language and named forms; those who realize it will naturally understand. Once one has realized the Dao, one no longer clings to distinctions between beauty and ugliness, good and evil. That is why the text next says, “All under Heaven know.” Since one is no longer stirred by relative conditions, judgments of right and wrong, beauty and ugliness, no longer lodge in the heart. That is why the text next says, “Do not exalt the worthy.” When worthy reputations are not exalted and possessions are not prized, the mind can become empty and tranquil; when the mind is empty and tranquil, the spirit can be nourished and kept within. This is the highest achievement of cultivation in Dao and De (Virtue/Power). Scholars who thoroughly understand these three chapters have already grasped most of the essential meaning of the entire classic.

Chapter Four: The Dao Is Empty

The Dao is empty and formless, yet in its activity it seems never to be exhausted.

The Imperial Commentary says: “The Dao has feeling, principle, and integrity, and so it can function; it is Wuwei and formless, and so it cannot be filled.”

“Chong” means balance and harmony. The Dao’s activity is to lower what is high and raise what is low, diminish what is in excess and make up what is lacking. Whatever the circumstances, it brings things back to balance. The Dao’s essence is empty and cannot be filled, yet it pervades everything without limit. It nourishes the myriad things but does not claim them as its own. That is why it seems never to be full.

渊兮似万物之宗。 温公曰:深不可测,常为物主。渊反流全一。《说文》曰:回水也。水回则深静,回而为渊,则止而不流,所以为一者全矣。兮者咏言之助。庄子曰:止水之审为渊。渊深而静,不与物杂,道之体也。惟深也,物莫能测。惟静也,物莫能动。道体渊兮深静,似为万物之宗祖。然道本无系物自宗道,故似之而已。其或言似者,言之不敢正也。人本足於此道,欲体之者,不可他求,当挫锐解纷,和光同尘,则当自存矣。 挫其锐,解其纷,和其光,同其尘。 温公曰:锋角猛露,道所恶也。事为烦乱,道所鄙也。辉华显赫,道败也。污辱卑下,道所贵也。 心出而入物为锐,挫公曰:锋角猛露,道所恶也。事为烦乱,道所鄙也。辉华显赫,道败也。污辱卑下,道所贵也。 心出而入物为锐,挫其锐而勿行。物至而交心为纷,解其纷而不乱。挫锐解纷,则性情定,而自然充实光辉矣。既有光辉,则要不异於物,与之和同而不显,所谓光而不耀也。内不失真,外不殊俗,同尘而不染,所谓与物委蛇,而同其波也。 湛兮似或存。 郭象曰:存,在也。道湛然安静,古今不变,终始常一,故曰存。存而无物,故曰似也。
Interpretation

How profound! The Dao is like the source of all things.

Sima Guang says: “Abyss” means so deep that it cannot be measured, yet it is often the foundation on which all things depend. “Abyss” can also mean water that flows back upon itself. The Shuowen Jiezi says, “An abyss is water that turns back upon itself.” When water turns in a whirl, it seems deep and still; when it turns into a deep pool, it becomes motionless and ceases to flow, thus returning to wholeness and unity. Here, “xi” is a particle used in recitation.

The Zhuangzi says that still water best reveals the character of an abyss. Deep and still, unmixed with external things: this is the substance of the Dao. Because it is deep, nothing can fathom it; because it is still, nothing can disturb it. The Dao’s substance is deep and quiet, as though it were the source from which all things arise. Yet the Dao does not depend on things; rather, things take the Dao as their root. So here we can only say “as though.” The classic uses the word “seems” because it does not presume to describe the Dao with absolute certainty.

People already possess this Dao. To experience it, there is no need to seek it elsewhere. Simply draw in your sharp edges and resolve your turmoil, keep your own radiance within, and live among ordinary people without setting yourself apart. Then the Dao will appear of itself.

Draw in your sharp edges, resolve your turmoil, keep your radiance within, and live among the world.

Sima Guang says: Showing one’s sharp edges is something the Dao abhors; a tangle of affairs is something it rejects; excessive brilliance harms the Dao; being content with a low position and not competing for prominence is what the Dao values.

When the mind chases after things, it becomes “sharp”; you should draw it in and not let it drive you. When external things arrive and stir the mind, they create turmoil; you should resolve it and not let the mind fall into confusion. Draw in your sharp edges and resolve your turmoil, and your temperament will settle; your own natural nature will grow full and shine with radiance. Even when you have this radiance, live among all things without standing out. This is “having light without dazzling.” Keep your inner nature true, and do not depart from the ways of ordinary life outwardly. Live among others without being tainted by them. This is following things as they are and moving with the changes of the world.

So deep and still! The Dao seems to have always been.

Guo Xiang says: “Being” means existence. The Dao is deep and quiet, unchanged from antiquity to the present, and constant from beginning to end; hence it is said to “be.” Though it exists, it has no visible form, so it is said to “seem” to exist.

人能如上四事,则湛然常寂而存矣。存而定有之,则非道也。似或者不可定有之谓。 吾不知其而无物,故曰似也。 人能如上四事,则湛然常寂而存矣。存而定有之,则非道也。似或者不可定有之谓。 吾不知其谁之子, 王元泽曰:即今所称道之中体,盖有所出矣。虽有所出而廓然无象,故曰不知谁之子。 言我不知道之所从生谁得而子之。 象帝之先。 御注:象者,物之始见。帝者,神之应物。物生而后有象,帝出而后妙物。象帝者,韦物之始而道实先之。庄子所谓神鬼神帝,生天生地是也。象有形之兆,帝有物之尊。象帝至矣,而道更在其先。此章言道以中为用,其体虚而不盈,为万有之主,居象帝之先。 天地章第五 天地不仁,以万物为刍狗。圣人不仁,以百姓为刍狗。 御注:恩生於害,害生於恩,以仁为恩,害则随至。天地之於万物,圣人之於百姓,辅其自然,无爱利之心焉。仁无得而名之。束刍为狗,祭杞所用,适则用之,过则地之於万物,圣人之於百姓,辅其自然,无爱利之心焉。仁无得而名之。束刍为狗,祭杞所用,适则用之,过则弃之。彼万物之自生,百姓之自治,曾何容心焉。
Interpretation

If people can accomplish the four things described above, they can remain clear and tranquil, in a state of constant stillness. But if they take this “existence” to be something fixed and definite, then it is no longer the Dao. The word “seems” here may indicate that the Dao’s existence cannot be definitively or fixedly described.

I do not know exactly what it is, nor do I know where it came from, so I can only say that it “seems” to be this way.

“I do not know whose descendant it is.”

Wang Yuanzhe says: This is what is now called the “substance within the Dao.” It seems to have a source; yet though it has a source, it is vast and empty, without form. Hence the statement, “I do not know whose descendant it is.”

The meaning is: I do not know where it came from, nor who could call it a child.

“It existed before the image and the Emperor.”

The Imperial Commentary explains: “Image” refers to the first traces in which things appear; “Emperor” is the divine power that governs how things respond. Things come first, and then traces appear; once the spirits manifest, the myriad things display their wondrous transformations. The “image and the Emperor” already mark the beginning and governing power of things, yet the Dao in fact precedes them. When Zhuangzi says, “It spirits the spirits and the Emperor, and gives birth to Heaven and Earth,” he is referring to the same idea. “Image” is the sign that visible things are emerging; “Emperor” is the exalted ruler among the myriad things. Even at the level of the image and the Emperor, the Dao still comes before them.

This chapter says that the Dao works through the “center.” Its substance is empty, still, and never overflows; it is the fundamental ruler of the myriad things, existing before images and divine rulers.

Chapter Five: Heaven and Earth

Heaven and Earth show no partial kindness; they treat the myriad things as straw dogs used in sacrifice. The sage, too, shows no partial kindness; the sage treats the people as straw dogs used in sacrifice.

The Imperial Commentary explains: A favor may bring harm, and harm may also arise from a favor. If kindness is treated as a favor, harm may follow from it. Heaven and Earth in relation to the myriad things, and the sage in relation to the people, simply follow their natural course. They harbor no partial affection and seek no deliberate advantage, so their way cannot be summed up by the usual notion of “kindness.”

Straw dogs are sacrificial objects: they are used in the ritual and discarded when it is over. The myriad things grow of themselves, and the people govern themselves; Heaven and Earth and the sage do not impose their own intentions upon them.

爱人利物之谓仁。不仁者,谓无情於弁爱,非薄恶之谓也。天地生化万物,任其自然,无爱利之心焉。如刍狗当祭祀之用也。盛以箧衍,巾以文绣,尸祝斋戒,然后用之。及祭之后,行者践其首脊,樵者焚其支体,彼物用弃,非有憎爱,时适然也。且天地之於万物,圣人之於百姓,亦然。故天地无恩而大恩生,圣人不仁而大仁成。 天地之间其犹弃钥乎。 唐明皇曰:橐者,韛也。钥者,笛也。橐之鼓风,钥之运吹,皆以虚而无心,故能动而有应。 王元泽曰:橐钥虚以应物,物感则应,应而不藏。天地之:橐者,韛也。钥者,笛也。橐之鼓风,钥之运吹,皆以虚而无心,故能动而有应。 王元泽曰:橐钥虚以应物,物感则应,应而不藏。天地之於万物,圣人之於百姓,应其适然,而不系累於当时,不留情於既往,故比橐钥之无穷也。 道无方体,以冲和之气鼓动於覆载之问,而生养万物。如橐以气化形,钥以气出声,气虚而待物,凡有形有声者,皆自此出,故比於橐钥也。以喻天地圣人,亦以虚而无心故也。 虚而不屈,动而愈出。 王弼曰:橐钥之中空洞,无情无为,故虚而不能穷屈,动而不可竭尽也。 王元泽曰:虚其体也,动其用也。 多言数穷,不如守中。
Interpretation

Benevolence means caring for others and benefiting all things. To be “not benevolent” means to care impartially, without favoring one side; it does not mean being cold or cruel.

Heaven and Earth give life to and nourish all things, following the natural course of things without favoring one thing or seeking benefit for themselves. The straw dogs used in sacrifice—ritual objects woven from straw—are placed in bamboo baskets and covered with embroidered silk. Before the ritual, the officiant reverently attends to them after observing purification rites. When the ritual is over, passersby trample their heads and backs, and woodcutters use their straw bodies as kindling. They are treated with solemnity and then discarded. This is not because Heaven and Earth, or people, love or hate them; it is simply how circumstances unfold. Heaven and Earth treat all things this way, and sages treat the people this way too. Thus Heaven and Earth show no personal kindness, yet bring about vast beneficence; sages do not bestow benevolence out of partiality, yet bring about great benevolence.

Isn’t the space between Heaven and Earth like a bellows and a flute?

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang said: “Tuo” means bellows, and “yue” means flute. The bellows set the air in motion, while the flute channels the airflow to produce sound. Both can function and respond because their insides are empty and they have no private intent.

Wang Yuanzhe said: The bellows and flute are empty inside, so they can respond to things outside them. When something outside affects them, they respond; once they have responded, they do not keep what they responded to in mind. Heaven and Earth toward all things, and sages toward the people, likewise respond to circumstances as they arise. They are not burdened by what is before them, nor do they hold on to what has passed. That is why, like the bellows and flute, their activity has no end.

The Dao has no fixed form. Through the balanced, flowing Qi of harmony, it sets Heaven and Earth in motion and gives life to and nourishes all things. The bellows use airflow to move their mechanism; the flute uses airflow to make sound. Because they are empty, they can receive and respond to things, giving rise to all forms and sounds. Comparing Heaven and Earth and sages to the bellows and flute therefore also means that, being empty, still, and impartial, they can respond to things.

Though empty, they are never exhausted; once in motion, their function wells up without end.

Wang Bi said: The bellows and flute are hollow inside. They have no feelings and make no deliberate effort. Thus they may seem empty, yet they are never exhausted; once set in motion, their function never runs dry.

Wang Yuanzhe said: “Emptiness” refers to their underlying nature; “movement” refers to their function.

Too many words can lead to exhaustion. Better to hold fast to inner emptiness and stillness.

御钥之中空洞,无情无为,故虚而不能穷屈,动而不可竭尽也。 王元泽曰:虚其体也,动其用也。 多言数穷,不如守中。 御注:慎汝内,闭汝外,收视反听,复以见天地之心,此之谓守中。 王弼曰:若不法天地之虚静,同橐钥之无心,动不从感,言不会机,动与事乖,故曰数穷。不如内怀道德,抱一不移,故曰守中。 此章戒人多言,不如守内。始言天地不弁,中以橐钥为况,终之以多言数穷者,欲人之出言,法天地之无心,如橐钥之虚中,因感而应,则无。始言天地不弁,中以橐钥为况,终之以多言数穷者,欲人之出言,法天地之无心,如橐钥之虚中,因感而应,则无多言之失。与其言多而政祸,不如默默而守中。 谷神章第六 谷神不死, 御注:有形则有盛衰,有数则有成败,形数具而生死分,物之理也。谷应群动而常虚,神妙万物而常寂,真常之中,与道为一,不丽於形,不堕於数,生生而不穷。如日月焉,终古不息。如维斗焉,终古不忒。故云不死。 河上公曰:谷,养也。人能养神则不死。神谓五脏之神,肝藏魂,肺藏魄,心藏神,肾藏精,脾藏志。五脏尽伤,五神去矣。
Interpretation

The bellows is empty at its center, without private intent or deliberate action. Though it is hollow, it cannot be compressed to the point of exhaustion; though it moves continually, it is never spent.

Wang Yuanzhe says: “Empty” describes its substance, while “moving” describes its function.

Too much talk can lead instead to difficulty. Better to keep to the center within.

The Imperial Commentary says: Guard the heart-mind with care, restrain the activity of the senses toward the outside, withdraw the gaze and quiet the hearing, then return inward to observe the original mind of Heaven and Earth. This is called “keeping to the center.”

Wang Bi says: If one does not take as a model the emptiness and stillness of Heaven and Earth, and does not respond without intention like the bellows, one’s actions will fail to accord with what is called forth, and one’s words will miss their proper moment. Then words and actions will run counter to the order of things, and one will repeatedly fall into difficulty. Better to hold Dao and De within, and embrace unity without wavering. This is called “keeping to the center.”

This chapter cautions people to guard the heart-mind rather than speak at length. It begins by saying that Heaven and Earth operate without partiality, uses the bellows as an image in the middle, and concludes that excessive speech leads to difficulty. It teaches people to speak by taking Heaven and Earth’s unintentional way as their model: remain inwardly empty like the bellows and respond naturally when something calls forth a response. In this way, one avoids the fault of saying too much. Rather than invite trouble with excessive speech, it is better to remain silent and keep to the center within.

Chapter Six: The Valley Spirit

The Valley Spirit never dies.

The Imperial Commentary says: Where there is form, there is flourishing and decline; where there is a fixed allotment, there is success and failure. When form and allotment are both present, life and death are distinguished—this is the constant order of the myriad things. A valley responds to every movement and stillness, yet remains empty. The wondrous power transforms and gives life to the myriad things, yet remains still. In the realm of what is true and constant, it is one with the Dao; it is not constrained by form or confined by a fixed allotment, and so it gives life without end. It is like the sun and moon, which have moved without ceasing since ancient times; it is also like the Northern Dipper, whose course has never strayed since ancient times. Thus it is said to “never die.”

Heshang Gong says: “Valley” carries the meaning of nurturing. If people can nurture their spirit, they can live long. Here, “spirit” refers to the spirits of the Five Viscera: the liver stores the hun, the lungs the po, the heart the spirit, the kidneys the essence, and the spleen the intent. When all five viscera are damaged, the five spirits depart.

温公曰:中虚故曰谷。不测故脏之神,肝藏魂,肺藏魄,心藏神,肾藏精,脾藏志。五脏尽伤,五神去矣。 温公曰:中虚故曰谷。不测故曰神。天地有穷而道无穷,故曰不死。 王元泽曰:谷应而不穷,神化而不测,万物受命於我,而我未尝生未尝死者,谷神也。言神则极矣,而加谷者,且言能虚能盈,而又能容以应也。以其活而不敌,故但称不死。 是谓玄牝。 御注:万物受命於无,而成形於有谷之用。无相,神之体,无方,万物所受命也。玄者天之色。牝者地之类。万物所成形也,谷神以况至道之常,玄牝以明造物之妙。 王元泽曰:谷神受命而玄牝赋形,自为阴阳,以成天地,然本一物也。由其受命,故地之类。万物所成形也,谷神以况至道之常,玄牝以明造物之妙。 王元泽曰:谷神受命而玄牝赋形,自为阴阳,以成天地,然本一物也。由其受命,故曰谷神。由其赋形,故曰玄牝。 曹道冲曰:玄者杳冥而藏神。牝者冲和而藏气。此阴阳之宗,天地之祖也。 谷,养也。谷虚而应,应而不着。谷虚而受,受而不积。言养神在於虚而已,是谓不死之道,在於玄牝也。 玄牝之门,是谓天地根。
Interpretation

Sima Guang says that the mind is empty, so it is called a “valley”; its workings are unfathomable, so it is called “spirit.” According to ancient teaching, the liver stores the Hun, the lungs store the Po, the heart stores the Shen, the kidneys store the Jing, and the spleen stores the will. When all five organs are damaged, the five mental faculties disperse as well.

He also says that Heaven and Earth have an end, but the Dao has no limit; hence it is called “deathless.”

Wang Yuanzhe says that a valley can respond to all things without being depleted, while the changes of spirit are impossible to fathom. All things receive life from me, yet I myself have neither birth nor death: this is the “Valley Spirit.” To call it “spirit” already says as much as can be said; adding “valley” shows that it can be empty and yet full, and can contain all things and respond to them. Its life-force flows without ceasing, so it is called “deathless.”

This is called the “Mysterious Female.” “Mysterious” means profound and subtle; “female” originally refers to a female being, but here it is a metaphor for the source that nurtures all things.

The Imperial Commentary says that all things receive life from “nonbeing,” then take form through the workings of “being.” Formless and without appearance, it is the wondrous substance; without a fixed location, it is the source from which all things receive life. “Mysterious” is like the color of Heaven, remote and profound; “female” belongs to the nature of Earth, through which all things take form. “Valley Spirit” serves as a metaphor for the Dao’s constant, unchanging aspect, while “Mysterious Female” explains the wonder of its creation of all things.

Wang Yuanzhe says that the Valley Spirit gives life to all things, while the Mysterious Female gives them form. Yin-Yang arises from this, as do Heaven and Earth, yet the two are originally one. Insofar as it gives life, it is called the “Valley Spirit”; insofar as it gives form, it is called the “Mysterious Female.”

Cao Daochong says that “mysterious” means profound and unseen, with wondrous power concealed within; “female” means empty and still, with primordial Qi concealed within. It is the source of Yin-Yang and the origin of Heaven and Earth.

“Valley” also carries the meaning of nourishment. A valley is empty, so it can respond; it responds to all things without clinging to what it responds to. A valley is empty, so it can contain; it contains all things without accumulating or transforming them. The point here is that the key to nourishing the spirit lies in emptiness and stillness; the way of deathlessness lies within the “Mysterious Female.”

The “Gate of the Mysterious Female” is the source of Heaven, Earth, and all things.

御注:庄子曰:万物有乎生而莫见其根,有乎出而莫见其门。而见之者,必圣人已。故於此明言玄牝之门,是谓天地根。天地者,万物之上下也。物与天地,本无先后,明大道之序,则有天地,然后有万物。然天地之所从出者,玄牝是已。彼先天地生者,孰得而见之。 河根。天地者,万物之上下也。物与天地,本无先后,明大道之序,则有天地,然后有万物。然天地之所从出者,玄牝是已。彼先天地生者,孰得而见之。 河上公曰:根,元也。言鼻。之门,乃是通天地之元,气所从往来也。 纂微曰:上言谷神不死,劝人养神之理。此曰玄牝之门者,示人炼形之术也。故神形俱妙者,方与道同也。 曹道冲曰:玄者天之体。牝者地之气。玄天之资始有生是为精光,牝母育万物是为形器。天地虽大,亦本於道德,体於阴阳,故曰天地根也。 绵绵若存, 河上公曰:鼻。呼吸喘息,常绵绵微妙。若可存之,复若无有。 王元泽曰:绵绵,引而不绝之谓。神牝生生不尽,而若有若无,不可定有。 用之不勤。 御注:自本自根,自古以固,存火之传,不知其尽也绝之谓。神牝生生不尽,而若有若无,不可定有。 用之不勤。
Interpretation

Zhuangzi says that although all things display signs of life, their source cannot be seen; although they come into being, no gateway can be found from which they emerge. Those who can see this source must be sages. Thus, the “gate of the Mysterious Female” is the root of Heaven and Earth. Heaven and Earth are above and below all things, and in themselves have no order of precedence. But if we speak of the order in which the Great Dao brings forth all things, Heaven and Earth come first, followed by all things. Yet Heaven and Earth themselves emerge from the Mysterious Female. Who, then, can see the source that existed before Heaven and Earth?

The Heshang Gong commentary says that “root” means origin. The “gate of the Mysterious Female” is the gateway leading to the origin of Heaven and Earth, and the place where primordial Qi circulates and moves back and forth.

The Zuanwei says that the earlier phrase “the valley spirit does not die” urges people to nurture the spirit, while “the gate of the Mysterious Female” here explains the method for refining the body. Only by refining both spirit and body to perfection can one unite with the Dao.

Cao Daochong says that “Mysterious” is the essential nature of Heaven, while “Female” is the breath of Earth. Heaven provides the fundamental conditions for the generation of all things, manifesting as subtle radiance; Earth is like a mother, conceiving and nurturing all things until they take concrete form. Vast though they are, Heaven and Earth both have their source in Dao and De, and embody Yin-Yang. That is why they are called the root of Heaven and Earth.

Heshang Gong explains “continuous, as if it were present” to mean that the breath passing through the nose is fine and prolonged, seeming to exist and yet almost not to exist. Wang Yuanze says that “continuous” means unbroken. The generative activity of the spirit and the Mysterious Female is inexhaustible, yet seems at once present and absent, so that its actual existence is difficult to determine.

“To use it without exhaustion” means that this fundamental activity can be put to use without being depleted or wearied.

御注:自本自根,自古以固,存火之传,不知其尽也。夫是之谓绵绵若存。茫然天造,任一气之自运。倏尔地化,委众形之自殖。乾以易知,坤以简能,非力致也,何勤之有。 河上公曰:用气当宽舒,不当急疾勤劳也。 苏子由曰:绵绵,微而不绝也。若存,存而不可见也。能如是,虽终日用之而不劳矣。 心定息微,任自然而无使气之强,何勤之有。此章之意主虚心养神,则不死在於玄牝。玄牝者,乃天地之宗,阴阳之祖,藏神蕴气,而万物恃之以生成者也。生成之理,绵绵而来则不死在於玄牝。玄牝者,乃天地之宗,阴阳之祖,藏神蕴气,而万物恃之以生成者也。生成之理,绵绵而来,不绝不尽,用之不劳,有得有成。诸家皆以外说,唯河上公纂微内说之以理。持之有内必有外,二义俱通,并皆录之。 天长地久章第七 天长地久。 苏子由曰:天地虽大,未离於形数,则其长久,盖有量矣。 张君相曰:乾刚广覆历古今不倾。坤柔厚载经终始弥固。 太上之言,长久极於天地,盖以人所见者言之耳。若夫长久之至,则所谓天地始者是矣。 天地所以能长且久者,以其不自生,故能长生。
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary says: The source of all things is deep and firm, continuing unbroken from ancient times. It is like a flame passed on without end; people do not know when it will be exhausted. This is called “continuous, as though it were present”: it goes on without interruption, seeming to exist yet difficult to see. Heaven and Earth arise naturally in their vastness, allowing the One Qi—the primordial energy that forms Heaven, Earth, and all things—to move of itself. The earth brings things forth in an instant, allowing all forms to multiply of themselves. The Qian trigram, which symbolizes Heaven, reveals its patterns with ease; the Kun trigram, which symbolizes Earth, accomplishes its work simply. None of this is obtained by deliberate exertion, so what is there to weary oneself over?

The Lord of the River says: The breath should be used gently and freely, neither hurried nor forced.

Su Ziyou says: “Continuous” means subtle yet unbroken; “as though it were present” means existing yet difficult to see. One who can do this may use it throughout the day without feeling weary.

When the mind and spirit are settled and the breath is fine, follow their natural course and do not force the Qi. What is there to weary oneself over? The point of this chapter is that by emptying and quieting the mind and nourishing the spirit, one can attain longevity within the Mysterious Female, the subtle gateway that symbolizes the source of Heaven, Earth, and all things. The Mysterious Female is the foundation of Heaven and Earth and the ancestral source of Yin-Yang; it stores spirit and primordial energy, and all things depend on it for their generation. The principle by which all things arise continues without end. When one uses it without strain, one can gain and accomplish something. Most commentators explain this through external things; only the Lord of the River, in his Collected Subtleties, explains it through inner principles. Since the inner and outer interpretations can be understood together, both are included.

Chapter Seven: Heaven and Earth Endure

Heaven and Earth endure.

Su Ziyou says: Although Heaven and Earth are vast, they still remain within the bounds of form and number; therefore, even their longevity has an end.

Zhang Junxiang says: Heaven is strong and vast, covering all things; it passes through past and present without collapsing. Earth is yielding and substantial, bearing all things; it remains firm throughout.

The words of the Most High (Laozi) use the Heaven and Earth that people can see to explain endurance. The ultimate form of endurance is what is called “the beginning of Heaven and Earth.”

Heaven and Earth can endure because they do not live for themselves; for this reason, they are able to live long.

王元泽曰:自生则有其生,有其生则生既丧矣。唯无以生为则生未尝生,未尝生则所寓之形虽生而无生之累,宜其长且久也。天地之不自生。唯无以生为则生未尝生,未尝生则所寓之形虽生而无生之累,宜其长且久也。天地之不自生非利乎,长久而然,道固如此而已。 张君相曰:万物皆自营其生,唯天地但知生育万物,不自营生。施生不自生,是故得长久。 是以圣人后其身而身先,外其身而身存。 御注:人皆取先,己独取后,曰受天下之垢,是谓后其身。后其身则不与物争,而天下莫能与之争。故曰:后其身而身先,在涂不争险易之利,冬夏不争阴阳之和,外死生遗祸福,而神未尝有所困也。是谓外其身而身存。 马巨济曰:圣人与天地同,则后身外身,犹之不自生。自先身存,犹之长生也。后身谓屈己也,外身谓忘我也,屈己则人下之,故身先。忘我则外身,故身存。 非以其无私耶,故能成其私。 也。后身谓屈己也,外身谓忘我也,屈己则人下之,故身先。忘我则外身,故身存。 非以其无私耶,故能成其私。 御注:天地之大德曰生。圣人之大宝曰位。道者,为之公。天地体道故无私,无私故长久。圣人体道故无私,无私故常存。自营为私,未有能成其私者也。
Interpretation

Wang Yuanze says: If one deliberately pursues life, one comes to cling to being alive. Once this attachment takes hold, life itself becomes a burden. Only by not making survival a deliberate goal can one avoid clinging to being alive. Then, dwelling within a body, one is no longer burdened by the need to survive even while the body remains, and can naturally endure for a long time. Heaven and Earth do not deliberately manage their own survival in order to seek longevity. They simply function as they do, and so endure. This is the way of the Dao.

Zhang Junxiang says: All things busy themselves with securing their own survival. Heaven and Earth alone concern themselves with bringing forth and nourishing all things, without managing their own survival. They give life without seeking survival for themselves, and so they endure.

Therefore, the sage puts himself behind others and thereby comes to the fore; he sets himself aside and thereby preserves himself.

The Imperial Commentary says: Everyone wants to be first, while the sage alone is willing to remain behind and bear the world’s disgrace. This is what it means to “put oneself behind.” By remaining behind, he does not contend with the myriad things, and so no one under Heaven can contend with him. Thus it is said that by staying behind, he comes to the fore. In traveling, he does not compete for the advantages offered by easy or difficult roads; between winter and summer, he does not seek the benefits of harmonizing Yin and Yang. He transcends life and death and is not burdened by fortune or misfortune, so his spirit is not troubled. This is what it means to “set oneself aside and thereby preserve oneself.”

Ma Jiji says: The sage is like Heaven and Earth. By staying behind and forgetting himself, he resembles Heaven and Earth, which do not manage their own survival. As a result, he preserves himself and endures for a long time, just as Heaven and Earth live on forever. “Staying behind” means yielding and willingly placing oneself below others; “forgetting oneself” means not keeping oneself in mind. Because he willingly places himself below others, they instead push him to the front; because he is not attached to himself, he is able to preserve himself.

Is it not precisely because the sage is selfless that he can fulfill himself?

The Imperial Commentary says: Heaven and Earth’s greatest virtue is to bring forth and nourish all things; the sage’s most precious possession is the throne. The Dao takes impartiality as its foundation. Heaven and Earth embody the Dao and so have no self-interest; because they have no self-interest, they endure. The sage embodies the Dao and so has no self-interest; because he has no self-interest, he endures. Those who concern themselves only with managing their own affairs and pursuing private gain have never truly fulfilled their own wishes.

吕吉甫曰:身者,吾之私也。后其身,外其身,则公而无私。无私也,故能成其私。 马巨济曰:天地不自生,与圣人之后外其身,皆无私也。然天地以此长生,而圣人以此长存,则皆成其私者也。然不私之巨济曰:天地不自生,与圣人之后外其身,皆无私也。然天地以此长生,而圣人以此长存,则皆成其私者也。然不私之为私大矣。庄子曰:无私焉,乃私也。 此章言道者为之公。天地体道故无私,无私故长久。圣人体道故无私,无私故长存。自营为私,未有能成其私者也。学者体道之公,不私一己,亦得其长久也。 道德真经取善集卷之一竟 3-道德真经取善集卷之二 道德真经取善集卷之二 宋饶阳居士李霖集 上善若水章第八 上善若水。 苏子由曰:天一生水,盖道运而为善,犹气运而生水也,故曰上善若水。 水蕴三能之近道,七善之利物。上善之人如之上善者,道之所谓善也,非天下皆知善之为善也。善者道之继,水为五行首,离道未远,其性最近道,盖离道则善名立矣。上善若水,物理自然。 水善利万物又不争,处众人之所恶,故几於道。
Interpretation

Lü Jifu says: The body belongs to me alone. If I put myself last and do not regard myself as most important, I can be fair and impartial. Because I have no selfish motives, I can instead fulfill myself.

Ma Jiji says: Heaven and Earth do not seek their own growth, and the sage puts himself last and does not regard himself as most important. These are all expressions of selflessness. Yet Heaven and Earth thereby continue their course for a long time, and the sage thereby endures for a long time. In this way, they ultimately fulfill themselves. The “self” fulfilled through selflessness is the greatest of all. Zhuangzi says, “Only by being selfless can one truly fulfill oneself.”

This chapter says that the Dao acts with fairness and selflessness. Heaven and Earth follow the Dao, so they have no selfish motives; because they have none, they endure. The sage follows the Dao, so he has no selfish motives; because he has none, he can endure. To concern oneself only with one’s own interests is selfish, yet no one can truly fulfill himself through such selfishness. Those who study the Dao should model themselves on its impartiality and make plans not only for themselves; in this way, they too can endure.

End of Volume One of Collected Selections from the True Classic of the Way and Its Virtue.

Collected Selections from the True Classic of the Way and Its Virtue, Volume Two

Compiled by Li Lin, a lay Buddhist from Raoyang, Song dynasty

Chapter Eight: The Highest Good Is Like Water

The highest good is like water.

Su Ziyou says: Heaven’s first generative force gives rise to water. The Dao moves and manifests as goodness, just as primordial Qi moves and generates water. Hence the saying, “The highest good is like water.”

Water possesses three qualities akin to the Dao and displays seven ways of benefiting the myriad things. The person of the highest goodness is likewise like water. The “highest good” here means the goodness embodied by the Dao, not the kind of goodness known to ordinary people. Goodness continues the Dao; among the Five Phases, water comes first, is close to the Dao, and has a nature most like it. Only when separated from the Dao does the name “goodness” arise. Thus, “the highest good is like water” expresses the natural principle of things.

Water is good at nourishing the myriad things, yet it does not contend with them. It settles in low places that everyone else despises, and so it is closest to the Dao.

The Collected Subtle Meanings says: These three qualities of water are akin to the Dao. Only when separated from the Dao does the name “goodness” arise; “the highest good is like water” expresses the natural principle of things. Water is good at nourishing the myriad things, yet it does not contend with them. It settles in low places that everyone else despises, and so it is closest to the Dao.

纂微曰:此三能之近道也离道则善名立矣。上善若水,物理自然。 水善利万物又不争,处众人之所恶,故几於道。 纂微曰:此三能之近道也。水性滋润,利泽万物,故曰善利,此一能也。方圆任器,壅决随人,故曰不争,此二能也。众人恶卑,水性趋下,此三能也。夫水利物则其仁广大,不争则其德谦光,处恶则其量忍垢,举水性之三能,唯至人之一贯,德行如斯,去道不远,故曰近尔。 居善地, 马巨济曰:善以处下为居,水以就下为地,在善得水之地,故曰:居,善地。 水之所居,善为地利。善人所居,化及乡党。 心善渊, 御注:测之而益深,穷之而益远。马巨济曰:善以安静为心,水以深静为渊,在善则得水之渊,故曰:心,善渊。 曹道冲曰:渊者水之止。虽有风波,莫能动其深静。至人之心,亦犹此也。 王元泽曰:深静而:心,善渊。 曹道冲曰:渊者水之止。虽有风波,莫能动其深静。至人之心,亦犹此也。 王元泽曰:深静而平,内明外晦。用心深静,反流全一。 与善仁, 御注:兼爱无私,施而无择。 苏子由曰:利泽万物,施而不求,其报善仁也。 马巨济曰:善以济物为与,水以利物为仁,在善则得水之仁,故曰:与,善仁。 水之所与,无有不润利万物,以生成者也。上善之人,亦如水之所与,博施於民,惠及群生,利益有情,不求其报,故曰:与,善仁。
Interpretation

The Zuanwei says: Water has three qualities that bring it close to the Dao (the Way). First, it nourishes all things and benefits them. Second, it takes on a square or round shape according to its surroundings, changing form with its container; it can also be stored or released as people wish. This is its quality of non-contention. Third, while everyone loathes low places, water always flows downward. Water’s benefit to all things embodies broad benevolence; its refusal to compete with them embodies humility; and its willingness to dwell in places everyone despises embodies the capacity to endure what is impure. These three qualities of water, taken together, run through the consistent De (Virtue/Power) of the perfected person who has attained the Dao. With such De, one is not far from the Dao. Hence the saying, “close to the Dao.”

Dwelling in good places

Ma Jiji says: “‘Good’ means that dwelling low is fitting. Water flows toward low places as its destination. So a person skilled in conducting themselves chooses a suitable place to live, like water. This is ‘dwelling in good places.’”

Where water settles, it makes good use of the advantages of the terrain. Where a good person lives, their teaching influences the neighbors and people of the community.

A good heart is deep

The Imperial Commentary says: “The more deeply one probes, the deeper it seems; the more one investigates, the farther-reaching it seems.”

Ma Jiji says: “‘Good’ means that stillness is fitting. Deep, still water is called an ‘abyss.’ A person skilled in self-cultivation has a heart as deep and still as an abyss of water. This is ‘a good heart is deep.’”

Cao Daochong says: “‘Abyss’ is where water rests in stillness. Even wind and waves cannot disturb its deep, tranquil nature. The heart of the perfected person is like this too.”

Wang Yuanze says: “The heart is deep, still, peaceful, and calm: clear within, reserved in its outward expression. With a deep and still heart, one can return to the source and keep the spirit undivided.”

A good giver is benevolent

The Imperial Commentary says: “One cares for all without selfishness and gives without making distinctions.”

Su Ziyou says: “To nourish and benefit all things, giving without seeking repayment—this is benevolence.”

Ma Jiji says: “‘Good’ means that helping all things is fitting. Water expresses its benevolence by benefiting all things. So a person skilled in practicing benevolence benefits all things, like water. This is ‘a good giver is benevolent.’”

Nothing fails to receive the moisture water gives: it nourishes all things and helps them grow. A person of the highest goodness is like water in this way. They extend their kindness widely to the people, their grace reaches all beings, and they benefit living creatures without seeking repayment. This is “a good giver is benevolent.”

言善信 御注:避碍而通诸海,行险而不失其信。 陆佃曰:履千险而不失其信,遇与,善仁。 言善信 御注:避碍而通诸海,行险而不失其信。 陆佃曰:履千险而不失其信,遇万折而不失其东,是谓言善信。 政善治, 御注:污者洁之,险者夷之,顺物之理,无容心焉,故无不治。 唐明皇曰:从政善治,亦如水之洗涤秽物,令其清净。 王弼曰:为政之善,无秽无偏,如水之治,至清至平。 刘仲平曰:然水之为物,未尝有言政也,而曰:言,善信。政,善治。何也方此因论善人若水,故以言政及於善仁也。 事善能, 御注:因地而为曲直,随器而为方圆,趣变无常而常可以为平,无能者若是乎。 苏子由曰:遇物赋形而不留於一,善能也。水之所事,方圆,趣变无常而常可以为平,无能者若是乎。 苏子由曰:遇物赋形而不留於一,善能也。水之所事,趣变无常,唯变所适,方圆随器,而不逆物,故事无不能也。上善之人,亦如水之因人任物,随顺世间而无逆物之心,故曰:事,善能。 动善时。 御注:阳释之而泮,阴凝之而冰,次诸东方则东流,次诸西方则西流,动而不括,宜在随时而已。
Interpretation

“True in word” means that water remains faithful as it flows. It avoids obstacles and eventually reaches rivers and seas; even when it passes through dangerous places, it never loses its direction. Lu Dian says that water endures every hardship without betraying its course. However many twists and turns it encounters, it still flows eastward: this is what “true in word” means.

“Good at governing” means that water can make what is turbid clean and what is uneven level. It follows the inherent principles of things and carries no private motives, so nothing is beyond its ability to govern. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang compared governing to water washing away dirt and leaving things clean. Wang Bi, meanwhile, said that good governance should be like water: clear and even, free of impurity and favoritism. Liu Zhongping points out that water itself does not discuss government, yet the classic says, “True in word, good at governing.” This is because water’s qualities are used here to explain the good person, leading in turn to the discussion of “goodness in benevolence.”

“Good at serving” means that water excels at responding to things. It bends or runs straight according to the terrain, and takes a square or round shape according to its container. It is ever changing, yet always adapts to its circumstances. Su Ziyou says that water takes on the shape of whatever vessel it encounters without being confined to any one form; this is what “good at serving” means. The person of highest goodness is like water: responsive to people and affairs, without deliberately resisting things from outside. Thus, there is nothing they cannot adapt to in their work.

“Good at timing in action” means acting with a keen sense of the right moment. When Yang Qi dissipates, water melts; when Yin Qi gathers, water freezes. Put it in the east and it flows east; put it in the west and it flows west. Its movement meets no obstruction: it simply responds to the season and circumstances at hand.

纂微曰:至人所居,善执谦下,顺物自然,化及乡党,如水在地,善就卑下,滋润群物,故曰:居,善地,此一善也。至人之心,善保虚静,洞鉴幽微,湛然通彻,如水渊澄,波党,如水在地,善就卑下,滋润群物,故曰:居,善地,此一善也。至人之心,善保虚静,洞鉴幽微,湛然通彻,如水渊澄,波流九变,不失明时,故曰:心,善渊,此二善也。至人施与,善行仁慈,惠及天下,不怀亲爱,如水膏润,善能升降,无不沾济,故曰:与;善仁,此三善也。至人之言。善守诚信,不与物期,自然符契,如水影物,妍丑无差,流满辄移,行险不失,故曰:言,善信,此四善也。至人从政,善治於民,正容悟物,物自顺从,如水清平,善定高下,涤荡群物,使无尘秽,故曰:政,善治,此五善也。至人临事,善能任物,随器授职,不失其村,如水柔性,善事方圆,能随形器,无用不成,故曰:事,善能,此六善也。至人动静,善观其时,出处应机,能全其道,如水之无用不成,故曰:事,善能,此六善也。至人动静,善观其时,出处应机,能全其道,如水之动,善随一变,冬凝夏液,不差其节,故曰:动,善时,此七善也。 虑善以动,动惟厥时,亦如水之春泮冬凝矣。 夫惟不争,故无尤。
Interpretation

The Zuanwei says: When a person who has attained the Dao makes a home, they are good at being humble and yielding, following the natural character of all things. Their teaching can also influence their neighbors and the people of their community. This is like water flowing over the earth: it always moves toward low places and nourishes all things. Thus it says, “In dwelling, be good like the land.” This is the first kind of goodness.

The heart of a person who has attained the Dao is good at remaining empty and still. It can see into what is deep and subtle, with clarity and openness. This is like water in a deep pool: clear and quiet, it changes in countless ways without losing its brightness. Thus it says, “In the heart, be good like a deep pool.” This is the second kind of goodness.

When a person who has attained the Dao gives to others, they are good at practicing benevolence. Their kindness reaches throughout the world, without favoring those close to them. This is like water nourishing all things: it can rise or descend, and nothing is beyond its reach. Thus it says, “In giving, be good in benevolence.” This is the third kind of goodness.

When a person who has attained the Dao speaks, they are good at keeping faith. They do not make deliberate agreements with external things, yet their words naturally accord with reality. This is like water reflecting all things, showing each as it is, whether beautiful or ugly. When the water is full, it moves on; even as it passes through dangerous places, it does not lose its nature. Thus it says, “In speech, be good in faithfulness.” This is the fourth kind of goodness.

When a person who has attained the Dao governs, they are good at governing the people. Through upright words and conduct, they inspire others, who then follow naturally. This is like clear, still water: it reflects high and low alike and can wash all things, keeping them free from dust and grime. Thus it says, “In governance, be good at governing.” This is the fifth kind of goodness.

When a person who has attained the Dao handles affairs, they are good at matching people to tasks. They assign roles according to each person’s abilities, so that no one’s talents go unused. This is like water’s yielding nature: it adapts to square or round vessels, taking their shape and serving its purpose accordingly. Thus it says, “In handling affairs, be good in ability.” This is the sixth kind of goodness.

Whether active or at rest, a person who has attained the Dao is good at observing the right moment. Their advance and retreat accord with the times, allowing them to preserve their Dao. This is like water changing with the seasons: it freezes in winter and melts in summer, never going against the season. Thus it says, “In action, be good at timing.” This is the seventh kind of goodness.

Think matters through before acting, and act only when the time is right, just as water thaws in spring and freezes in winter, following the seasons.

Precisely because they do not contend with others, they incur no fault or resentment.

苏子由曰:有善而不免於人非者,以其争也。水唯不争,故兼七善而无尤。 此章言水之为物,利益群品,柔弱不争,常处卑下,故兼三能总七善而无尤,非上善之人其孰能似之。 持而盈之章第九 持而盈之,不如其已。 吕吉甫曰:力持而满之,未必富者也。持所以防溢,而盈之则重溢上善之人其孰能似之。 持而盈之章第九 持而盈之,不如其已。 吕吉甫曰:力持而满之,未必富者也。持所以防溢,而盈之则重溢也。如欲勿溢,则如勿盈。 持,执持也。盈,满也。已,止也。执持所以防溢,而又盈之,势必倾危,故不如早上。 揣而锐之,不可长保。 温公曰:揣知物情,锐求进入,必将失之。 吕吉甫曰:情度而入之,求必贵者也。揣所以虑失而锐之,则重失也。如欲勿失,则如勿锐。 揣者巧於度情,锐者利於入物。揣度锐利,进取荣名,虽得之,必失之,故不可长保。 金玉满堂,莫之能守。 舒王曰:堂者虚而受物者也。金玉满之则是盈矣。故不能守。 马巨济曰:堂奥足以藏金玉而守之者也。其害在满,苟非天殃,必有人祸。
Interpretation

Su Ziyou says: When people do good deeds yet still cannot avoid criticism, it is because they are striving for something. Water does not contend with anything, and so it embodies seven virtues without fault.

This chapter discusses the nature of water: it nourishes all things, is yielding and does not contend, and usually stays in low places. It therefore has three strengths, embodies all seven virtues, and is without fault. Who besides someone who has attained the state of “supreme goodness” could be like water?

Chapter Nine: Holding and Filling

Holding a vessel and continuing to fill it is not as good as stopping in time.

Lü Jifu says: Straining to keep things overflowing does not necessarily make one rich. Holding something is originally meant to prevent it from spilling over; if one keeps filling it, it becomes all the more likely to overflow. To keep it from spilling over, it is better not to fill it completely.

“Hold” means to grasp and keep hold; “full” means filled; “stop” means to cease. One holds something to prevent it from spilling over, yet then fills it to the brim. The result is bound to be collapse, so it is better to stop in time.

Sharpen it, and it cannot stay sharp for long.

Wen Gong says: If one gauges the circumstances and hastily seeks advancement, one will ultimately lose what one has gained.

Lü Jifu says: Gauging the circumstances is meant to avoid mistakes. But if, after doing so, one simply makes a show of one’s sharpness and rushes to advance, one compounds those mistakes. To avoid loss, it is better not to press too hard for advancement.

“To gauge” means to skillfully assess the circumstances; “sharp” means being bent on pressing forward. After gauging the circumstances, if one then flaunts one’s sharpness and pursues fame and success, one may gain them for a time, but will eventually lose them. They cannot be held for long.

When gold and jade fill the hall, no one can keep them safe.

Prince Shu says: A hall is originally an empty space meant to hold things. When gold and jade pack it full, it is overfilled and therefore difficult to keep secure.

Ma Juji says: The inner recesses of a hall can be used to store and guard gold and jade, but disaster lies in piling up too much. Even without calamities from heaven, human calamities are bound to follow.

This passage explains that what is overfilled is difficult to hold on to for long. Only by keeping things sufficient without letting them overflow can wealth be retained over time.

此明盈难久持也。满而不溢,所以长守富也。持而盈之巨济曰:堂奥足以藏金玉而守之者也。其害在满,苟非天殃,必有人祸。 此明盈难久持也。满而不溢,所以长守富也。持而盈之,则金玉满堂,莫之能守矣。 富贵而骄,自遗其咎。 御注:金玉富贵,非性命之理也。外物之不可恃而有者也。宝金玉者累於物。累於物能勿失乎,故莫之能守。富贵而骄,则害於德。害於德者能免於患乎,故自遗其咎。圣人不拘一世之利,以为己私分,不以王天下,为己处显。夫岂金玉以为宝,富贵之足累乎。故至富国财并焉,至贵国爵并焉,其贵无敌,其富无伦,而道不渝。 河上公曰:富当赈贫,贵当怜贱,而反自骄恣,必被祸患也。 舒王曰:富贵不期骄而骄自至,所以遗咎患也。 此明锐不可揣也。高而不危,所以长守贵也。揣而锐之,则富贵骄生,以咎自与自至,所以遗咎患也。 此明锐不可揣也。高而不危,所以长守贵也。揣而锐之,则富贵骄生,以咎自与。 功成名遂身退,天之道。 苏子由曰:日中则移,月满则亏,四时之运,功成者去,天地尚然,而况於人乎。
Interpretation

This passage explains that a state of fullness is difficult to maintain for long. Wealth can be preserved over time when it is abundant but does not overflow; if one only accumulates and fills the hall with gold and jade, no one will be able to hold on to it.

If the wealthy and powerful grow arrogant, they bring calamity upon themselves.

The Imperial Commentary says that gold, jade, wealth, and high rank are not essential to one’s life and nature. They are external possessions, and one cannot expect them to belong to oneself forever. If one prizes gold and jade too highly, one becomes entangled in external things; once entangled in them, how could one avoid losing them? If one grows arrogant on account of wealth and rank, one damages one’s De; when De is damaged, how could one escape calamity? Thus misfortune is brought on by oneself. The sage does not claim temporary advantages as his own, nor use ruling the world as a means to glorify himself. How, then, could he be entangled in gold, jade, wealth, or rank? When one reaches the highest degree of abundance, the world’s wealth can all gather there; when one reaches the highest degree of honor, the world’s ranks and titles can all converge there. His honor has no equal, and his abundance has no match, yet his Dao remains unchanged.

Heshang Gong says that when wealthy, one should aid the poor; when honored, one should show consideration for those of low station. If instead one becomes arrogant and self-indulgent, one will surely invite calamity.

King Shu says that people may not deliberately seek to become arrogant, but after gaining wealth and rank, arrogance often grows of its own accord. Thus they bring calamity upon themselves.

This also explains that when one’s brilliance is too conspicuous, it is hard to last. One can preserve high rank over time only by holding it without endangering oneself. If one keeps sharpening oneself like a blade, one is liable to grow arrogant on account of wealth and rank, and so bring misfortune upon oneself.

Once one’s work is complete and one’s name established, one should withdraw. This is the way of nature.

Su Ziyou says that when the sun reaches its zenith, it begins to move westward; once the moon is full, it begins to wane. The seasons change in the same way: when things have completed their function, they recede. If this is true even of Heaven and Earth, how much more so of human beings?

利人曰功,闻誉施身曰名。功譬富贵之实也,名譬富贵之华也。功及於人而成就,名施於身而称遂。退身避位,永无祸患,是乃天之常道也。此章戒富不可满,贵不可食。夫持满不如早止,揣锐势又挫衄。金玉满而难守,富贵骄而遗咎,功成而不处,名遂而不尸,知损为益,乃符天道。 载营魄章第十 载营魄, 王元泽曰:魄,阴物形之主也。神之为物,广大通达,而不自了者,神常载於魄,故神反拘於形体,此广者所以狭,通者所以滞也。欲学此道者,当先廓其志气,勿累於形体,使之为物,广大通达,而不自了者,神常载於魄,故神反拘於形体,此广者所以狭,通者所以滞也。欲学此道者,当先廓其志气,勿累於形体,使神常载魄而不载於魄,则可以抱一而体神矣。 马巨济曰:人之生诸阳为魂,诸阴为魄,藏於肝肺之间,精与神相依以生,而并精出入者魄也,随神往来者魂也。 此篇言载营魄,营即魂是也。
Interpretation

“Benefiting others” is called “merit,” while “having one’s merit praised and applied to oneself” is called “fame.” Merit is like the substantial foundation of wealth and honor; fame is like their outward luster. Merit brings benefit to others and achieves something, while reputation attaches to oneself and earns praise. Once merit is accomplished, withdrawing from office and stepping aside allows one to remain free of calamity for a long time. This is the constant principle of the Dao of Heaven.

This chapter cautions people against seeking wealth to the point of excess and claiming honor as their own. Rather than straining to maintain fullness, it is better to stop in time; when one’s edge is too sharp, it is more easily blunted. A great accumulation of gold and jade is hard to preserve, while arrogance amid wealth and honor invites calamity. To accomplish merit without taking credit for it, to attain fame without making it one’s identity, and to understand that reducing can bring benefit—this is what accords with the Dao of Heaven.

Chapter Ten: Carrying the Hun and Po

“Carrying the Hun and Po” means bringing the soul and bodily spirit into a settled harmony.

Wang Yuanze says: The Po is the Yin aspect that governs the body. The nature of Shen is vast and open, yet Shen cannot fully understand itself on its own. Shen is often bound to the Po and so constrained by the body: what was originally vast becomes narrow, and what was originally open becomes obstructed. Those who wish to learn this Dao should first broaden their aspirations and avoid being burdened by the body, so that Shen can govern the Po rather than be bound by it. In this way, they can hold fast to the One—the fundamental Dao spoken of in Daoism—and realize the wondrous principle.

Ma Jüji says: In human life, the part formed from Yang Qi is called the Hun, while the part formed from Yin Qi is called the Po. The Hun and Po reside between the liver and lungs, sustaining life through their interdependence with Jing and Shen. Of the two, the Po accompanies Jing as it enters and leaves, while the Hun comes and goes with Shen.

In this chapter, “carrying the Hun and Po” means that “carrying” refers to the Hun.

《内观经》曰:动以营身谓之魂。魂主经营动作,为一身之运,为魂则并精出入,主化成变而已。今百骸九窍,具吾形者魄之属也。使非魂以营之,则与行尸何以异乎。魄不可以无魂,犹月不可以无日。魄待魂而成营,月待日而生光,,主化成变而已。今百骸九窍,具吾形者魄之属也。使非魂以营之,则与行尸何以异乎。魄不可以无魂,犹月不可以无日。魄待魂而成营,月待日而生光,此言魂之用而曰营,言魄之体而曰魄也。载谓以形载也。 旧说皆谓营为魂,唯元泽御解说营为止也。一说载者,形载魂魄也。一说神载魄也。 抱一能无离乎? 舒王曰:一者精也。魂魄既具则精生,精生则神从之。 王元泽曰:一者精之数,而不言精,而言一者守一,则精不摇矣。 马巨济曰:营魄者异事在于抱一而已。道生一,一生水,水生精,精者一之物也。抱一则与精合,脱一则与精离矣。精至而气全,气全而神全,神全所以制魂魄为上士矣。精者,天地万物所由以生成也。
Interpretation

The Inner Observation Scripture (Neiguan Jing) says: What moves and operates, sustaining the body, is called the hun (ethereal soul). The hun governs the body’s functions, enabling the whole person to act. It accompanies Jing (essence, the foundation of human life processes) as it enters and leaves, and directs the body’s transformations.

The limbs, bones, and nine apertures—the body’s various openings—make up the physical form; these belong to the po (corporeal soul). Without the hun to set the body in motion, how would the physical form differ from a walking corpse? The po cannot exist without the hun, just as the moon cannot exist without the sun. The po relies on the hun to sustain the body’s activity; the moon borrows the sun’s light to shine. Here, “nourishing” describes the hun’s function, while “po” refers to the physical dimension. “Bearing” means supporting the physical form.

Most earlier interpretations take “nourishing” to refer to the hun. Only Yuanze’s Imperial Commentary (Yujie) takes it to mean resting and becoming still. Another interpretation says that “bearing” means the physical form supports the hun and po; yet another says that Shen (spirit) supports the po.

“Can you embrace the One and keep it from departing?” means: Can you hold fast to the One and prevent it from dispersing?

Prince Shu says: The “One” is Jing. Once the hun and po are present, Jing arises; when Jing arises, Shen follows.

Wang Yuanze says: The “One” is the number corresponding to Jing. The passage says “One” rather than “Jing” directly because holding fast to the One keeps Jing from wavering.

Ma Jiji says: The hun and po have different functions, and the key is to embrace and hold fast to the One. The Dao gives rise to the One; the One gives rise to water, and water in turn gives rise to Jing. Jing is what the One generates. Embrace the One, and you can unite with Jing; lose the One, and you become separated from Jing. When Jing is abundant, Qi (vital energy) is complete; when Qi is complete, Shen is complete as well. Only when Shen is fully developed can it govern the hun and po, making one a superior adept—a person accomplished in cultivating the Dao. Jing is the foundation on which all things under Heaven are generated.

“Nourishing” can also mean becoming still and resting. The po belongs to Yin and governs the physical form; it depends on the body as its place of rest. Thus, “nourishing the po and bearing it” means that Shen supports the po. When Jing, Qi, and Shen are complete, they can govern the hun and po, making one a superior adept. Jing is the foundation on which all things under Heaven are generated.

营,止也。魄,阴也。形之主丽於形而有所止,故言营魄载者,以神载魄也。若全,气全而神全,神全所以制魂魄为上士矣。精者,天地万物所由以生成也。 营,止也。魄,阴也。形之主丽於形而有所止,故言营魄载者,以神载魄也。若无神以载之,则滞於幽阴,形散神离,下与万物俱化。神常载魄而不载於魄,则炼阳神消阴魄身化为仙也。其事在乎抱一而不离一者精也。抱一则精与神合而不离,则以精集神,以神使形,以形存神,三者混而为一,则道全。欲学此道者,当存精为本。庄子曰:不离於精谓之神人,此教人养精也。 专气致柔,能如婴儿乎? 纂微曰:言人欲学专气政柔之术,当如婴儿纯和乎。若能如婴儿之纯和,即是得专气致柔之不离於精谓之神人,此教人养精也。 专气致柔,能如婴儿乎? 纂微曰:言人欲学专气政柔之术,当如婴儿纯和乎。若能如婴儿之纯和,即是得专气致柔之术也。 精全则神王,神王则能帅气,神专其气而喜怒哀乐不为神之所使,以致柔和也。专者有而擅其权之谓,柔者和而不暴之谓。气致柔和,当如婴兑之心也。欲虑不萌,意专志一,终日号而嗌,不嗄和之至,此教人养气也。 涤除玄览,能无疵乎? 马巨济曰:此章以全精全气全神为学道之根,故无离以言养精,如婴儿以言养气,无疵以言养神也。
Interpretation

“En” means to settle or attach. “Po” is Yin; it is the vital energy linked to the physical body. The Po governs the body and finds a place to settle by attaching itself to it. Thus, “bearing the Po with the Ying” means using the Shen to bear the Po. Without the Shen to bear it, the Po would remain trapped in darkness and gloom. The body would dissolve, the Shen and Qi would depart, and in the end it would perish along with all things.

The Shen should bear the Po without being constrained by it. Only then can one refine and nourish the Yang Shen, dissolve the Yin Po, and transform the body into an immortal body. The key is “embracing the One”: holding fast to the undivided root, which is Jing. By embracing this One, Jing and Shen unite and do not separate. Jing gathers the Shen; the Shen governs the body; and the body, in turn, preserves the Shen and Qi. When Jing, Shen, and the body blend into one, the Dao is complete. Anyone who wishes to cultivate this Dao should take the preservation and nourishment of Jing and Qi as the foundation. Zhuangzi says, “One who does not depart from Jing is called a spiritual person.” This means that someone whose Jing and Qi do not dissipate may be called a spiritual person; the teaching is to nourish Jing.

“By focusing Qi and bringing it to softness, can you be like an infant?” means: Can you cultivate the breath with single-minded focus until it becomes gentle and soft, as in an infant?

The Zuānwēi explains that anyone wishing to learn the method of focusing Qi and bringing it to softness should be as pure and harmonious as an infant. To retain an infant’s purity and harmony is to achieve focused Qi and softness—that is, a state in which Jing and Qi do not disperse.

The saying “when Jing is whole, Shen flourishes” means that when Jing and Qi are abundant, Shen becomes vigorous; when Shen is vigorous, it can govern the breath. If the mind and Shen regulate the breath with single-minded focus, untouched by joy, anger, sorrow, or pleasure, the breath can become gentle and soft. “Focus” means holding undivided command; “softness” means calmness without force. The breath should reach the gentleness of an infant’s state of mind: free of scattered desires and thoughts, with the mind intent on one thing. An infant may cry all day without becoming hoarse because its breath is perfectly regulated. This is a teaching on nourishing Qi.

“Can you cleanse your inner vision until it is without flaw?” means: Can you purify the deepest awareness of the mind so that it is free of blemish?

Ma Jüji says that this chapter regards the complete nourishment of Jing, Qi, and Shen as the foundation of learning the Dao. It teaches the nourishment of Jing through “not departing,” the nourishment of Qi through the image of an infant, and the nourishment of Shen through “being without flaw.”

“Inner vision” refers to the deepest awareness of the mind. According to Ma Jüji’s interpretation, this chapter takes the completeness of Jing, Qi, and Shen as the foundation of cultivation. The earlier passage explains nourishing Jing through “not departing” and nourishing Qi through the image of an infant; here, “without flaw” explains nourishing Shen.

玄览者,此章以全精全气全神为学道之根,故无离以言养精,如婴儿以言养气,无疵以言养神也。 玄览者,心也。涤者,洗心也。除者,刳心也。洗之而无不静,刳之而无不虚,心之虚静,无一疵之可睹。庄子曰:纯粹而不杂静,一而不变,此教人养神也。 爱民治国,能无为乎? 河上公曰:治身者爱气则身全。治国者爱民则国安。治身者呼吸精气无令耳闻。治国者布德施惠无令下知。 此申抱一之义也。《内丹经》云:圣人以身为国,以心为君,以精气为民,民安国霸。精者身之本,爱啬精气则身治也。爱精之道,抱一为本,乃自然之道,夫何为哉。故曰能无为乎。今炼精之士,或以杂术为务,以般运为治也。爱精之道,抱一为本,乃自然之道,夫何为哉。故曰能无为乎。今炼精之士,或以杂术为务,以般运为功,多有作为,故又戒以无为。庄子曰:唯无为几存。诸解皆说外,唯河上公内外两说之。以上文考之,就身说者於经以顺。 天门开阖,能为雌乎? 王元泽曰:至人无心於作精神,出入皆应而不唱。 此申专气之义也。恐炼气之士有使气之强,故又戒以守雌,雌者致柔也。 明白四达,能无知乎? 御注:聪明圣智,守之以愚。 此申无疵之义也。炼神之士,纯素而不杂,通彻而无碍,当不用知见守之以愚,故又戒之以无知也。 生之畜之,? 御注:聪明圣智,守之以愚。
Interpretation

“Gazing inward” refers to the mind. “Washing” means cleansing the mind, and “clearing away” means removing distracting thoughts from it. Wash the mind until it is utterly still, then clear away distracting thoughts until it is utterly empty: the mind will be empty, still, and clear, without the slightest flaw. Zhuangzi said, “Pure and unmixed, quiet and single-minded, it does not change with external things.” This teaches people how to nurture the spirit.

In caring for the people and governing the state, can one follow nature without forcing action?

The Heshang Gong commentary says: Those who cultivate themselves cherish their Jing and Qi, and so preserve their bodies; those who govern the state care for the people, and so keep the state at peace. In cultivating oneself, regulate the breath and preserve Jing and Qi without letting others notice; in governing the state, bestow kindness and benefits without making the people feel that these are being deliberately imposed.

This further explains the principle of “holding to the One,” or maintaining singleness of purpose. The Neidan Jing says that sages regard the body as a state, the mind as its ruler, and Jing and Qi as its people. When Jing and Qi are settled, the body is strong. Jing is the foundation of the body; only by cherishing and conserving Jing and Qi can the body be brought into harmony. The foundation of caring for Jing and Qi is holding to the One. This is simply following the way of nature, so why deliberately do anything? Hence the question, “Can one practice Wuwei?”

Those who cultivate Neidan sometimes become occupied with various esoteric techniques, treating the circulation of Jing and Qi as their practice and doing too much. The scripture therefore warns them again to practice Wuwei. Zhuangzi said, “Only Wuwei comes close to preserving life.” Most commentators explain this mainly in terms of external matters such as governing the state; only the Heshang Gong commentary discusses both inner and outer cultivation. In light of the preceding passage, understanding it in terms of self-cultivation better fits the flow of the scripture.

When the heavenly gate opens and closes, can one remain soft and yielding like a female?

Wang Yuanze says: A person of the Dao does not harbor an intention to manipulate the spirit deliberately. As the spirit comes and goes, it responds only as needed and does not actively force anything.

This further explains the principle of “concentrating the Qi.” Those who cultivate Qi may be tempted to force its movement, so the scripture again warns them to keep to the female. “Female” refers to softness and yieldingness.

In clear perception and understanding, can one do without reliance on cleverness?

The Imperial Commentary says: Even with intelligence and wisdom, one must remain grounded in simplicity and Wuwei.

This further explains what it means for the mind to be without flaw. Those who cultivate the spirit should be simple, single-minded, and unobstructed in their understanding. Even when they possess insight, they should remain grounded in simplicity, without being led by distinctions or cleverness. The scripture therefore warns them to be “without knowledge.”

In giving life to and nurturing the myriad things, in nourishing and sustaining them, …

The Imperial Commentary says: Even with intelligence and wisdom, one must remain grounded in simplicity and Wuwei.

此申无疵之义也。炼神之士,纯素而不杂,通彻而无碍,当不用知见守之以愚,故又戒之以无知也。 生之畜之,生而不有,为而不恃,长而不宰,是谓玄德。 御注:圣人存神知化,与道同体,则配神明育万物,无不可者。生之以遂其性,畜之以极其养。无爱利之心焉,故生而不有。无矜伐之行焉,故为而不恃,无刻制之巧焉,故长而不宰。若是者其德深矣远矣,与物反矣,故曰是谓玄德。 此章以全精全气全神为学道之根,三者混而为二,乃道之全也。 三十辐章第十一 三十辐共一毂,当其无有,车之用。埏埴以为器,当其无有,器之用。凿户牖以为室,当其无有,室之用。 御注:有无一致,利用出入,是谓至神。有无异相,在有为体,在无为用,阴阳之运,万物之理也。车之用在运,器之用在之用。 御注:有无一致,利用出入,是谓至神。有无异相,在有为体,在无为用,阴阳之运,万物之理也。车之用在运,器之用在盛,室之用在虚。妙用出於至无,变化藏於不累,如鉴无象,因物显照,至人用心,每解乎此。 故有之以为利,无之以为用。
Interpretation

This passage explains the meaning of “without blemish.” Those who cultivate the spirit should be simple and undivided, free of distracting thoughts, with an open and unobstructed mind. At this point, they should not cling to knowledge and opinions as a way of limiting themselves. Instead, they should remain empty, still, and unadorned. Hence the further warning against clinging to cleverness.

Nourish all things without claiming them as one’s own; act without relying on one’s achievements; help all things grow without directing them. This is called “Mysterious De” (profound and subtle Virtue).

The Imperial Commentary says: The sage preserves and nourishes the spirit, understands transformation, and becomes one with the Dao. Thus the sage can work in harmony with the divine power to nurture all things, with nothing beyond their capacity. The sage enables all things to grow and realize their own nature, then cares for them so they are fully nourished. Without greed or a desire to repay kindness, the sage helps all things grow without possessing them. Without boasting of achievements, the sage acts without relying on those achievements. Without using cleverness to force control over all things, the sage lets them grow without ruling them. This De is profound and subtle, beyond the ordinary feelings of most people; hence it is called “Mysterious De.”

This chapter takes the preservation of Jing, Qi, and Shen as the foundation of learning the Dao. When the three are fully integrated, one reaches the complete state of the Dao.

Chapter Eleven: Thirty Spokes

Thirty spokes converge at a wheel’s hub, but it is the hollow space within the hub that makes the wheel turn. Clay is shaped into a vessel, but it is the hollow space within the vessel that makes it useful for holding things. Doors and windows are cut to build a house, but it is the open space inside that makes the house fit to live in.

The Imperial Commentary says: Though being and nonbeing take different forms, they complement one another. Their function becomes apparent in the space between them; this is called “ultimate numinous efficacy.” Being is form, and nonbeing is function. The workings of Yin-Yang and the patterns of all things are like this. A cart’s function is to carry, a vessel’s to hold, and a house’s to provide space. Subtle function appears from a state of utmost emptiness, while transformation is contained in what is free from entanglement. This is like a mirror, which has no fixed image of its own yet reflects different scenes according to what stands before it. Those who have attained the Dao use their mind and spirit to grasp this principle.

Thus, what has form provides convenience, while the empty space without form is what performs the actual function.

锺会曰:举上三事,明有无相资俱不可废。故有之以为利,利在於体。无之以为用,用在於空。故体为外,利资空用以得成。空为内,用籍体利以得就。但利用相藉,咸不可亡也。无赖有为利,有藉无为用,二法相假。 车惠弼曰:修身者,必须以有资空以空导有,有无资导心不偏溺,故成人之利用。 此章明有无一致,利用相资,,二法相假。 车惠弼曰:修身者,必须以有资空以空导有,有无资导心不偏溺,故成人之利用。 此章明有无一致,利用相资,举三事以明大道。夫轮毂为车,埏埴为器,户牖为室。此有也,人赖以为利。毂中空虚,轮得转行。器中空虚,物得盛受。室中空虚,人得居处。此无也,人赖以为用。有为实利,必以无为用。无乃妙,用必以有为体。有无相待,亦犹形神相须而不可偏废也。形以神为主,神以形为居,形神合同更相生成。世之昧者,炼神者蔽於无,养形者溺於有,是二者胥失也。殊不知此章取三物为喻,以明有无之相生。欲学道者,依此修持,则形神俱妙,与道合真矣。 五色章第十二 五色令人目盲,五音令人耳聋, 御注:纵耳目之欲属於声色,虽具耳目之形而不自见自闻,与盲聋也奚异。 五味令人口爽,
Interpretation

Zhong Hui says: The wheel, the vessel, and the house are offered as examples to show that “being” and “nonbeing” depend on each other; neither can be dispensed with. “Being” brings practical benefit, which lies in the concrete form. “Nonbeing” provides practical function, which lies in the empty space within the form. The form is on the outside, the empty space within. Empty space can perform its function only through the benefit provided by form, while form can serve its purpose only because of empty space. Each relies on the other, and neither can be lacking. Solid being gains its benefit through empty nonbeing, while empty nonbeing performs its function through solid being: the two depend on each other.

Che Huibi says: Those who cultivate themselves must use “being” to support “emptiness,” and use “emptiness” to guide “being.” By letting being and nonbeing assist one another, the mind avoids becoming attached to or immersed in either side. Only then can each fulfill its own function.

This chapter explains that being and nonbeing are one and support each other, using three things as examples. The center of a wheel is empty, allowing it to turn and move. A vessel is empty inside, allowing it to hold things. The open spaces between a house’s doors and windows allow people to enter, leave, and live there. The forms of the wheel, vessel, and house belong to “being,” from which people gain benefit. The empty spaces within them belong to “nonbeing,” through which people put them to practical use.

Concrete form brings benefit, but must rely on empty space to function; for empty space to function, it too must depend on concrete form. Being and nonbeing depend on each other, just as body and spirit rely on one another and neither can be neglected: the body is guided by the spirit, and the spirit takes the body as its dwelling. The two unite and give rise to each other. Those in the world who do not understand this principle become attached to “nonbeing” when refining the spirit, then become immersed in “being” when nourishing the body, and in the end lose both. This chapter uses three things to explain how being and nonbeing give rise to each other. Those who study the Dao and cultivate themselves according to this principle can perfect both body and spirit and ultimately unite with the Dao in their true nature.

Chapter Twelve: The Five Colors

The five colors dazzle the eyes; the five tones deafen the ears.

The Imperial Commentary says: If people indulge their eyes and ears in desires for sights and sounds, then, despite having eyes and ears, they cannot truly see or hear. How are they any different from the blind and the deaf?

The five flavors dull the sense of taste.

王元泽曰:人生而静,因物有迁。耳目本自希夷而不自见自闻,与盲聋也奚异。 五味令人口爽, 王元泽曰:人生而静,因物有迁。耳目本自希夷,而声色在前真从妄丧。口之於味,亦复如此。 驰骋田猎令人心发狂, 吕吉甫曰:万物无足以挠之者,心之所以静而圣也。逐乎外则罔念而发狂矣。事奚不然,驰骋田猎尤为甚。 太康畎洛表而五子咸怨。哀公好田猎而诗人所刺。外作禽荒,田猎无度,迷於正性,非狂而何。 难得之货令人行妨。 御注:贵难得之货,则至於次性命之情,而饕富贵,何行迷於正性,非狂而何。 难得之货令人行妨。 御注:贵难得之货,则至於次性命之情,而饕富贵,何行之能守,故令人行妨。仲虺之称汤曰:不殖货利。孔子谓子贡曰:赐不受命而货殖焉。货之妨行如此。 夫明月之宝,夜光之璧,适足以贾害。孟子曰:宝珠玉者,殃必及身。 是以圣人为腹不为目, 锺会曰:真气内实,故曰为腹。嗜欲外除,故曰不为目。五音令人耳聋,故圣人为腹不为目,诸相例也。 为腹者守精神而真气内实。不为目者去六情目不妄视。 故去彼取此。 河上公曰:去彼目之妄视,取此腹之养神。
Interpretation

Wang Yuanze says: People are originally in a state of quiet purity, but later change under the influence of external things. The ears and eyes are originally in subtle stillness, without deliberately listening or looking. Once sounds and sights appear before them, the true nature is obscured by deluded thoughts. How are they then any different from the blind and the deaf? The tongue and mouth are likewise enticed by flavors.

Lü Jifu says: Only when nothing external can disturb the heart-mind can people remain quiet and pure and become sages. If they pursue external things single-mindedly, their minds fill with distracting thoughts and they become confused. This is true of most worldly affairs, and riding out to hunt is especially likely to become an obsession.

Xia Taikang became engrossed in hunting. After he lost the state, his five younger brothers voiced their resentment in the “Song of the Five Sons.” Duke Ai of Lu also favored hunting and was censured by a poet. To become obsessed with hunting and roaming without restraint is to lose one’s original nature. Is this not a kind of mental derangement?

Precious and hard-to-obtain goods can harm people’s conduct. The imperial commentary says: When rare goods are prized, even above life and one’s natural disposition, people covet wealth and status and lose their original nature. How can they still hold to the right path? That is why it is said that hard-to-obtain goods harm one’s conduct.

Zhong Hui praised Shang Tang for not accumulating goods or seeking profit. Confucius also told his disciple Zigong that he had not followed instruction, but had gone into business and amassed wealth. It is clear that pursuing riches can harm De (Virtue/Power). Treasures such as luminous pearls and jade that glows at night may instead bring calamity. Mencius said that those who cherish pearls and jade will surely bring disaster upon themselves.

Therefore, sages attend to nourishing what is within and do not pursue pleasures for the outer senses. Zhong Hui explains: “Filling the belly” means making the true Qi (vital energy) abundant within; “not filling the eyes” means removing desires so that the eyes do not freely chase after external things. The scripture says that the five tones make people deaf; the same principle applies to the other senses.

“Filling the belly” means guarding the spirit and making the true Qi abundant within. “Not filling the eyes” means removing the six forms of sensory and emotional agitation, so that the eyes do not look about recklessly.

Therefore, one should set aside external temptations and choose ways of nourishing body and mind. Heshang Gong explains: “Setting aside that” means not letting the eyes look about recklessly; “choosing this” means nourishing the body and spirit through food and drink.

目主外视,腹主内容。圣人实其腹,不为耳目所役,故去彼外视之去彼目之妄视,取此腹之养神。 目主外视,腹主内容。圣人实其腹,不为耳目所役,故去彼外视之目,取此能容之腹。夫圣人清净六根,於此独言不为目者,盖言目则其余可知也。此章言五尘之害性,当忘物以全真,圣人之去取,卓梢娨印 宠辱章第十三 宠辱若惊。 舒王曰:宠之所以为辱者,以其若惊也。 马巨济曰:宠者辱之本,以系乎得失故也。以见宠於人,则其惊弥甚,是宠之犹辱之也。宠者荣宠也。心荣见宠,即惊其神,此宠之所以为辱也。 贵大患若身。 御注:宠者在下,贵者在上,居宠而以为荣,则辱矣。处贵而以为累,则患莫大焉。贵者尊贵也。心有所贵,其患大矣。譬若人身动辄在下,贵者在上,居宠而以为荣,则辱矣。处贵而以为累,则患莫大焉。贵者尊贵也。心有所贵,其患大矣。譬若人身动辄自累。 何谓宠辱?宠为下。 御注:贪夫名慕夫禄,知进而不知退,知得而不知丧,受宠於人,则为下之道。 问何故宠之为辱,受宠於人为下之道,既受宠於人,则与夺之权在人之手。若以得失累其心,岂不惑哉。子文三仕三巳,无喜愠之色者,岂有辱乎。 得之若惊,失之若惊,是谓宠辱若惊。
Interpretation

The eyes govern outward seeing, while the belly governs receptivity. The sage makes the belly full and is not controlled by the ears and eyes. Thus, the sage sets aside the outward-looking eyes and relies on the belly, which can nourish the spirit and receive things.

The eyes govern outward seeing, while the belly governs receptivity. The sage makes the belly full and is not controlled by the ears and eyes. Thus, the sage sets aside the eyes’ reckless outward gazing and relies on the belly, which can receive things. The sage stills the six faculties—the eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind, with their powers of perception and cognition. This passage mentions only freedom from the eyes’ influence because once the eyes are named, the other senses can be understood by analogy. This chapter explains that the five sensory objects of the external world—forms, sounds, scents, tastes, and touch—harm a person’s nature. One should therefore forget external things in order to preserve one’s true nature. The sage’s choices are most discerning.

Chapter 13: Favor and disgrace

Favor and disgrace alike bring alarm.

Wang Anshi says: Receiving favor is like receiving disgrace because favor makes one feel fearful and unsettled.

Ma Jiji says: Favor is the root of disgrace because it binds one to gain and loss. When others show someone favor, that person’s heart becomes even more fearful; therefore, receiving favor is like receiving disgrace. Favor means honor and grace. If one regards being favored as an honor, one’s spirit becomes unsettled. This is why receiving favor is like receiving disgrace.

Regard great trouble as you regard your own person.

The Imperial Commentary says: Favor is often bestowed on those of low status, while the honored occupy the higher positions. If, while being favored, one treats it as an honor, disgrace will follow. If, while holding an honored position, one treats it as a burden, there can be no greater trouble. To be honored is to hold a prominent status. When the heart cherishes something, one will suffer great anxiety on its account, just as people are often burdened by their own person.

What is meant by favor and disgrace? Favor puts one in a low position.

The Imperial Commentary says: Those who covet fame admire stipends. They know only how to advance, not how to yield; they know only how to gain, not how to lose. By accepting another person’s favor, one places oneself in a position of subordination.

Someone asks: Why does receiving favor become a disgrace? Because accepting favor puts one in a position of subordination: once favored, one leaves the power to grant or withdraw that favor in another person’s hands. If one lets gain and loss entangle the heart, is that not confusion? Zixi served three times as an official and was dismissed three times, yet his face showed neither joy nor anger. How could he have felt disgraced?

Receiving it brings alarm; losing it brings alarm. This is what is meant by favor and disgrace alike bringing alarm.

温公曰:为士者以道德为上,爵禄为下。上荣也,下辱也。众人乃宠其辱,操之则栗,合之则悲。 得之本有,失之本无,乌能有惊。若以得失之际,有若惊之心,是以辱也。柳下惠为士师三黜而不去,正考父三命循墙而走,则有惊。若以得失之际,有若惊之心,是以辱也。柳下惠为士师三黜而不去,正考父三命循墙而走,则异於此。 何谓贵大患若身? 御注:据利势,擅赏罚,作福威,天下畏之如神明,尊之如上帝,可谓贵矣。圣人则不以贵自累,故能长守贵而无息,譬如人身堕肢体,黜聪明,离形去智,同於大通,则无入而不自得也。世之人以物易性,故累物而不能忘势。以形累心,故丧心而不能忘形。其患大矣。 王元泽曰:贵者在物之上,而有国有家之而不能忘,则为患大矣。譬人有身珍而累之,则寒暑疾痛万绪皆何,岂非大患乎。 吾所以有大患者,为吾有不能忘,则为患大矣。譬人有身珍而累之,则寒暑疾痛万绪皆何,岂非大患乎。 吾所以有大患者,为吾有身, 河上公曰:吾所以有大患者,正吾有身。有身则忧其动劳,念其饥寒,触情纵欲,则遇祸患。 身为患者,以吾执有其身,为患大矣。 及吾无身,吾有何患。
Interpretation

Master Wen said: Those who study and enter public service should put moral character first and rank and salary second. Moral character brings true honor, while rank and salary may bring humiliation. Yet people in the world mistake humiliation for glory: when they gain rank and salary, they tremble with anxiety; when they lose them, they are overwhelmed with grief.

To gain rank and salary is only to possess them for a time. To lose them is simply to return to having none. What is there to fear? If someone is constantly distressed by gain and loss, it shows that rank and salary have bound them, and so they are humiliated. Liuxia Hui, a worthy man of the Spring and Autumn period in the state of Lu, was dismissed three times from his post as judge, yet did not leave. Zheng Kaofu, a minister of the state of Song in the Spring and Autumn period, was appointed to office three times and each time walked respectfully close to the wall. Their attitude toward gain and loss was unlike that of those who fret over what they might gain or lose.

What does it mean to “regard the great calamity as important as one’s own body”?

The Commentary by the Imperial Editor says: To wield power, control rewards and punishments, dispense favors and establish authority, and be revered by all under Heaven as they revere the spirits and honored as they honor the Lord of Heaven—this may be called eminence. But the sage does not let eminence become a burden, and so can hold on to it for a long time without end. It is like ceasing to cling to one’s limbs and senses, escaping the constraints of the body and cleverness, and merging with the Great Dao: then one can be at ease wherever one is. People in the world trade their nature for external things, and so are burdened by those things and cannot let go of power. They also let the body burden the mind, and so lose their original heart and cannot let go of the body. These are great troubles.

Wang Yuanze said: To be eminent is to stand above all things. Even if one possesses a state or a family estate, being unable to forget it makes it a great calamity. It is like someone who cherishes their body and is therefore burdened by it: the changes of cold and heat, illness and pain, and all kinds of troubles follow one after another. Is this not a great calamity?

The reason I have great calamity is that I have this body.

The Lord of the River says: The reason I have great calamity is precisely that I have a body. Having a body means worrying that it will grow weary and fretting that it will go hungry or suffer from cold. If one indulges one’s desires and lets one’s emotions rule, one may also invite disaster.

The body becomes a source of trouble because I cling to “having a body”; that clinging itself is the great calamity.

When I no longer cling to myself, what troubles could remain?

蔡子晃曰:无身者,谓不以身为身,S乎造化物我俱忘患,何能及非是灭坏其身,唤作无身。 无身者,非谓灭坏其身为无身也。盖虽有身而不执,有其身有之以无有耳。若孔子之母,我子綦之丧我是也。 故贵以身为天下,若可寄天下。爱以身为天下,若可托天下。 御注:天下大器,非道莫运。天下神器,非有耳。若孔子之母,我子綦之丧我是也。 故贵以身为天下,若可寄天下。爱以身为天下,若可托天下。 御注:天下大器,非道莫运。天下神器,非道莫守。圣人体道,故在宥天下,天下乐推而不厌。其次,则知贵其身而不自贱,以役於物者,若可寄而已。知爱其身而不自贼,以困於物者,若可托而已。故曰:道之真以治身,其绪余以为国家土直以治天下。世俗之君子乃危身弃生以殉物,岂不悲夫。 王弼曰:无物以易其身,故曰贵也。无物以损其身,故曰爱也。如此乃可以寄托天下也。不以宠辱荣患,损易其身,然曰贵也。无物以损其身,故曰爱也。如此乃可以寄托天下也。不以宠辱荣患,损易其身,然后乃可以天下付之也。
Interpretation

Cai Zihuang says: “‘Having no body’ does not mean regarding the body as nonexistent. It means not clinging to the body as a fixed ‘self,’ and thus forgetting the myriad things and oneself within the transformations of creation. How, then, could troubles and misfortunes disturb such a person? ‘Having no body’ does not mean destroying the body and making it disappear.

“‘Having no body’ means not destroying the body, but having a body without clinging to it—having this body without treating it as something truly substantial. This is the same as what Confucius meant by ‘I have lost myself’ (letting go of fixed views that cling to the self), and what Ziqi ‘lost himself’ as described by Zhuangzi.

“Therefore, only one who regards the world as more important than himself can be entrusted with the world. Only one who cares for himself yet is not burdened by private desires can be given charge of the world.”

The Imperial Commentary says: “The world is a great vessel; without the Dao, it cannot function. The world is also a wondrous vessel; without the Dao, it cannot be safeguarded. The sage understands the Great Dao, and so can embrace and nurture the world. The people gladly uphold him and do not grow weary of him. Those of the next rank know how to cherish themselves: they do not demean themselves or let external things drive them. Such people may perhaps be entrusted with the world. They know how to care for themselves without harming themselves or allowing external things to entrap them. Such people may perhaps be given charge of the world.

“Hence it is said: ‘The root of the Dao is used to cultivate oneself; its surplus effects are used to govern the state, and beyond that, to govern the world.’ Yet worldly gentlemen endanger themselves and give up their lives in pursuit of external things. This is truly lamentable.”

Wang Bi says: “Not letting external things alter one’s original mind is what is meant by ‘honoring the body’; not letting external things harm oneself is what is meant by ‘caring for the body.’ Only one who can do this may be entrusted with the world. If one does not let favor, disgrace, glory, or misfortune damage or alter oneself, only then may the world be given into one’s care.”

贵者不辱其身,爱者不危其身,如此乃可寄托天下也。若子州支父、王子搜之徒是也。二人者,岂荣其宠累其贵乎。此章言辱自宠生,忘宠则无辱。身为息本,忘身则无患。既忘宠贵之累,则绝惊患之忧,然后贵爱其身,可以寄托天下。 道德真经取善集卷之二竟 4-道德真经取善集卷之三 道德真经取善集卷之三 宋饶阳居士李霖集 视之不见章第十四 视之不见名曰夷, 御注:目主视,视以辫物,夷则平而无辫,非视所及,故名曰夷。太易未见气是已。 王元泽曰:道至於万集 视之不见章第十四 视之不见名曰夷, 御注:目主视,视以辫物,夷则平而无辫,非视所及,故名曰夷。太易未见气是已。 王元泽曰:道至於万物,平等无有高下之处,非目所视。 此明道也。夷,平易也。道非色,故视之不见。虽不见也,然能玄能黄,不可名之无色也,曰夷而已。 听之不闻名曰希, 御注:耳主听,听以察物,希则概而有闻,非听所闻,故名曰希。大音希声是已。 庄子曰:听而可闻者,名与声。道无声,非耳所闻,故曰希也。虽不闻也,然能宫能商,不可名之无声,曰希而已。 搏之不得名曰微。 御注:微乎微乎,至於无形,孰得而搏之。大象无形是已。
Interpretation

People of De do not bring humiliation upon themselves, and those who cherish their own lives do not place themselves in danger. Only such people can be entrusted with all under Heaven. People like Zizhou Zhifu and Prince Sou were like this. Would they regard favor as an honor, or be burdened by their exalted status? This chapter says that humiliation arises from receiving favor; forget favor, and there is no humiliation. The self is the foundation on which life rests; forget the self, and there are no troubles. Once no longer burdened by favor or honor, one is free of fear and distress. Only then can one cherish oneself and take responsibility for all under Heaven.

End of Collected Good Interpretations of the True Classic of the Dao and Its De, Volume Two.

Collected Good Interpretations of the True Classic of the Dao and Its De, Volume Three

Compiled by Li Lin, a lay Daoist of Raoyang during the Song dynasty

Chapter Fourteen: The Invisible

Look at it, but it cannot be seen; this is called “Yi” (the level and undifferentiated).

The Imperial Commentary says: The eyes govern seeing, and seeing is used to distinguish things. “Yi” means a level state without distinctions, which the eyes cannot see; hence it is called “Yi.” This is the state before the Great Yi—the condition in which Heaven and Earth have not yet divided and Qi has not yet appeared—has manifested its breath.

Wang Yuanze says: When the Dao reaches among the myriad things, it is equal everywhere, with no distinction between higher and lower. Therefore, it is not something the eyes can see.

This passage speaks of the Dao. “Yi” means level and easy. The Dao has neither form nor color, so it cannot be seen when one looks at it. Though unseen, it can nevertheless manifest colors such as deep black and bright yellow. We cannot therefore say it has no color at all; we can only call it “Yi.”

Listen to it, but it cannot be heard; this is called “Xi” (faint and difficult to hear).

The Imperial Commentary says: The ears govern hearing, and hearing is used to discern things. “Xi” means something vast yet difficult to hear, which the ears cannot hear; hence it is called “Xi.” This is what is meant by “the greatest sound is scarcely heard.”

Zhuangzi says: What can be heard is called names and sounds. The Dao has no sound and is not something the ears can hear; hence it is called “Xi.” Though unheard, it can nevertheless manifest tones such as Gong and Shang. We cannot therefore say it has no sound at all; we can only call it “Xi.”

Touch it, but it cannot be grasped; this is called “Wei” (subtle and formless).

The Imperial Commentary says: The Dao is so subtle that it has no physical form. Who, then, could touch it? This is what is meant by “the greatest image has no form.”

无形曰微。搏,执持也。道无形,故执持不得。虽不得也,然能阴能阳,能柔能刚,能短能长,能圆能方,能暑能凉,能浮能沉,能苦能甘,无形曰微。搏,执持也。道无形,故执持不得。虽不得也,然能阴能阳,能柔能刚,能短能长,能圆能方,能暑能凉,能浮能沉,能苦能甘,於无形之中而能形焉,故名曰微。 此三者不可致请,故复混而为一。 御注:太易未判,孰分高下。大音希声,孰辫清浊。大象无形,孰为巨细。目无所用其明,耳无所施其聪,形无所竭其力,道之全体於是乎,在穷之不可究,探之不可得也。气形质具而未相离,故混而为一。虽然既已为一矣,且得无言乎。 三者谓夷、希、微也。不可致诘者,谓无色无声无形,口不能言,书不能传,当受之以静,求之以神,不可诘问而得之。混,合也。三名合而为一,三者本一体而人之所以求者。或视或听或搏,故随事强名耳。 其上不皦,其下不昧, 王元泽曰:凡物有质则,不可诘问而得之。混,合也。三名合而为一,三者本一体而人之所以求者。或视或听或搏,故随事强名耳。 其上不皦,其下不昧, 王元泽曰:凡物有质则具阴阳,上皦下昧,理必然也。唯道无物,故混然而成。此言道之定体。庄子曰:失吾道者,上见光而下为土。
Interpretation

What has no form is called “subtle.” “Grasping” means taking hold of something and keeping it in one’s possession. The Dao has no fixed form, so it cannot be grasped in one’s hands. Though it cannot be grasped, the Dao enables all manner of forms and qualities to appear: Yin and Yang, softness and firmness, length and shortness, roundness and squareness, heat and cold, rising and sinking, bitterness and sweetness. The Dao itself is formless, yet it brings the myriad things into view from within formlessness. That is why it is called “subtle.”

The three—“Yi,” “Xi,” and “Wei”—cannot be fully explained through words, so they are also collectively called “the One.”

The Imperial Commentary says: Before Heaven and Earth and the myriad things were differentiated, how could high and low be distinguished? The greatest sound is almost inaudible; how could clear and muddy tones be distinguished? The greatest image has no fixed form; how could it be called large or small? At that time, the eyes have no use for sight, the ears no use for hearing, and the body no need to expend effort. The Dao in its complete state is present within this. One may try to investigate it to the utmost, yet never reach its end; one may try to grasp it, yet never obtain it. Qi, form, and substance are all present, but have not yet separated from one another, and so they are united as one. Since it has already been called “the One,” it can of course also be described in words.

The “three” here refers to “Yi,” “Xi,” and “Wei.” “Cannot be fully explained” means that the Dao has no color, sound, or form; it cannot be expressed in words or transmitted through writing. It should be experienced with a quiet mind and understood through the spirit; it cannot be attained simply by asking questions. “Mixed” means united. The three names are united as one and are all, in essence, the Dao. People seek it from different angles—some try to see it, some to hear it, and some to grasp it—and so they give it different names according to what they encounter.

Above, the Dao is not bright and dazzling; below, it is not dark.

Wang Yuanze says: Everything that has form and substance contains Yin and Yang; brightness above and darkness below are the usual way of things. Only the Dao has no fixed form, and so it is a seamless whole. This explains the Dao’s constant underlying reality. Zhuangzi says, “Those who lose my Dao see brightness above, and below they turn into earth.”

绳绳不可名,复归於无物。 吕吉甫曰:绳绳兮调直而有信。虽有信也,而不可名,故复归於无物。 是谓无状之状,无物之象,是谓惚恍。 纂微曰:夫复归於无物者,非空寂之谓也。谓於无形状之中,而能造一切形状,於无物象之中,而能化一切物象,欲言有邪而不见其形,是即有而无也。 纂微曰:夫复归於无物者,非空寂之谓也。谓於无形状之中,而能造一切形状,於无物象之中,而能化一切物象,欲言有邪而不见其形,是即有而无也。欲言无邪而物由以成,是即无而有也。恍者有之疑於无,惚者无之疑於有,道之为物,非有非无,不可定名,故曰:惚恍。 迎之不见其首,随之不见其后。 御注:其始无首,其卒无尾,故迎之随之,有不得而见焉。 苏子由曰:道无所不在,故无前后可见。 执古之道,以御今之有。 王弼曰:古今虽异,其道常存。执之者方能御物。 吕吉甫曰:无前无后,则不古不今。虽不古不今,而未尝无古今也。则吾得之以曰用矣。故曰:执古之道,以御今之有。。执之者方能御物。 吕吉甫曰:无前无后,则不古不今。虽不古不今,而未尝无古今也。则吾得之以曰用矣。故曰:执古之道,以御今之有。 能知古始,是谓道纪。
Interpretation

The Dao, subtle and continuous, cannot be fully described with a name. In the end, it returns to a state without form or substance.

Lü Jifu says, “‘Continuous’ describes the Dao as unceasing, harmonious, and upright. It seems to have signs by which it can be recognized, yet it still cannot be named. Hence the saying that it returns to nothingness.”

This is called “the shape of what has no shape, the image of what has no image”—that is, “huhuang,” elusive and hard to grasp.

The Zuanwei explains that “returning to nothingness” does not mean that the Dao is merely empty and still. It means that although the Dao has no fixed form, it can generate every form; although it has no fixed image, it can bring forth and transform the myriad things. If we say it exists, we cannot see its form: this is being that contains nonbeing. If we say it does not exist, the myriad things are nevertheless generated from it: this is nonbeing that contains being. “Huang” means that being seems to approach nonbeing; “hu” means that nonbeing seems to approach being. The Dao is neither simply being nor simply nonbeing, and cannot be defined by any fixed name. That is why it is called “huhuang.”

Face it, and you cannot see its beginning; follow it, and you cannot see its end.

The Imperial Commentary says that the Dao has no starting point when it begins and no end when it concludes. Thus, whether one faces it or follows it, one cannot see its beginning or end.

Su Ziyou says that the Dao is everywhere, so there is no before or after to be seen.

Hold fast to the Dao that has existed since ancient times, and use it to govern the myriad things of the present.

Wang Bi says that although past and present differ, the Dao has always been there. Only by holding fast to the Dao can one govern the myriad things.

Lü Jifu says that the Dao has neither before nor after, and so there is no distinction between past and present. Yet the past and present have not thereby disappeared; we can still experience the Dao in our everyday practice. Hence the saying: hold fast to the Dao that has existed since ancient times, and you can respond to the affairs of the present.

To know the ancient origins of the myriad things is called grasping the Dao’s guiding principle—its fundamental law.

吕吉甫曰:所谓古者,非异於今也。以知古之所自始也。所谓今者,非异於古也。以知今之所从来也。诚知古之所自始,则知今之所从来矣。始无所自来无所从,所谓无端之纪也。无端之纪,道纪也。道不可执也。得此可以执之,以为德矣。执德之谓纪。 王元泽曰:推而上之至於无物之初,乃知物无所从来。道之情得矣道之纪,要古今不变者,是庄子所谓无端之纪也。 李畋曰:此章言妙本应用物之初,乃知物无所从来。道之情得矣道之纪,要古今不变者,是庄子所谓无端之纪也。 李畋曰:此章言妙本应用,何所不无也。若以视听求之,了勿可得。以皦昧察之,湛勿可分。物象不能名,始终不可睹,其用难测,以御有为。 古之善为士章第十五 古之善为士者,微妙玄通,深不可识 舒王曰:士者事道之名,始乎为士,则未离乎事道者也。终乎为圣人,则与道为一事,道不足以言之,与道为一则。所谓微妙玄通,深不可识是已。 灵仙曰:道无不通名善,事无不达为士。前章执古御今,此则御今引古。 前章论道之全体,此章言士之体道。微者彰之反也,妙者危之反也。玄则深远不测,通则变化无穷。古之善为士者,有此道而退藏於密不可测,究孰得而识之哉。故曰深不可识。
Interpretation

Lü Jifu says: “What is called ancient is not different from the present. If we understand where antiquity began, we can understand where the present came from. What is called the present is likewise not different from antiquity. If we understand the origins of the present, we can understand the beginnings of antiquity. To truly understand the beginning of antiquity is also to understand the source of the present. The beginning of the myriad things has no traceable source, and their destination has no traceable end. This is what is called the ‘guiding principle without beginning or end’—the fundamental order that has neither a starting point nor an endpoint. It is also the guiding principle of the Dao. The Dao cannot be seized or grasped. If one can apprehend its fundamental basis, one can hold fast to it and thereby realize De. Holding fast to De is what is meant by a guiding principle.”

Wang Yuanze says: “Trace things ever farther back, until reaching the time before the myriad things came into being, and it becomes clear that they came from nowhere. In this way, one apprehends the reality and guiding principle of the Dao. The guiding principle of the Dao is what does not change between ancient and present times; it is what Zhuangzi called the ‘guiding principle without beginning or end.’”

Li Tian says: “This chapter speaks of the Dao’s fundamental subtlety and its ability to act through the myriad things. Where do the myriad things come from? Trace them back to their beginning, and it becomes clear that they came from nowhere. In this way, one apprehends the reality and guiding principle of the Dao. The guiding principle of the Dao is what does not change between ancient and present times; it is what Zhuangzi called the ‘guiding principle without beginning or end.’”

Li Tian also says: “This chapter discusses the Dao’s subtle foundation and its application, which encompasses everything. If one seeks the Dao through sight and hearing, one ultimately finds nothing. If one tries to observe it through light and darkness, it remains so remote and hidden that it cannot be distinguished. No image of the myriad things can name it, and its beginning and end cannot be seen. Its workings are difficult to fathom, yet it can be used to guide purposeful action.”

Chapter Fifteen: The Ancient Masters Skilled in the Dao

Those in ancient times who were skilled in cultivating the Dao were subtle, mysterious, and adept at change. They were so profound that no one could understand them.

Duke Shu says: “‘Master’ is a name for someone devoted to serving the Dao. At first, such a person is still cultivating and serving the Dao. Upon completing their practice and becoming a sage, they become one with the Dao. The Dao itself cannot be fully expressed in words. Becoming one with the Dao is precisely what is meant by ‘subtle, mysterious, profound, and penetrating, so deep that they cannot be understood.’”

Lingxian says: “The Dao penetrates everywhere, and so it is called ‘skilled’; all that one undertakes is accomplished, and so one is called a ‘master.’ The previous chapter discusses holding fast to the ancient Dao in order to guide the present; this chapter discusses using the ancient Dao to lead the present.”

The previous chapter discusses the Dao as a whole; this chapter explains how those who cultivate the Dao embody it. “Subtle” is the opposite of what is evident: it refers to what is fine and hidden. “Mysterious” is the opposite of what is coarse and apparent: it refers to what is difficult to fathom. “Profound” means remote and unfathomable; “penetrating” means capable of endless change. Though the ancient masters skilled in the Dao possessed these qualities, they kept them deeply concealed, revealing nothing and allowing no one to fathom them. Thus no one could see through them. This is what is meant by “so deep that they cannot be understood.”

夫惟不可识,故强为之容。 御注:化无穷。古之善为士者,有此道而退藏於密不可测,究孰得而识之哉。故曰深不可识。 夫惟不可识,故强为之容。 御注:天之高不可俄而度也。地之厚不可俄而测也。曰圆以覆,曰方以载者,拟诸其容而已。强为之容,岂能真索其至。谓下文也,夫惟道大难识,强为之容而已。 豫若冬涉川;犹若畏四邻; 吕吉甫曰:庖丁解牛,休然为戒,视为止,行为迟,动刀甚微,则豫若冬涉川者也。豫则图之於事之始也。謋然已解,如土委地,提刀而立,为之四顾,为之踌躇满志,善刀而藏之,犹若畏四邻者也。犹则慎之於事之终也。 豫者图息於未然,犹者致疑於已是。由膝以上为涉,集众流为川。涉川者犯难也。冬者至寒之时,徒涉巨川,以见至人不好从事,於务出於不疑於已是。由膝以上为涉,集众流为川。涉川者犯难也。冬者至寒之时,徒涉巨川,以见至人不好从事,於务出於不得已,常迫而后动,临事而惧也。故曰豫若冬涉川,既涉则无虑矣。而犹戒曰犹至人静密幽深,不出性宅,常若畏邻,敛而不纵,闲邪存诚,非物探之,其心不出,故曰犹若畏四邻。 俨若客; 王元泽曰:不以事为己任,故其容寂。
Interpretation

Only the Dao (the Way) is so profound, vast, and boundless that it is difficult to know. We can only try to describe what it is like.

The Imperial Commentary says: In ancient times, those skilled in cultivating the Dao held it within themselves, yet withdrew and concealed themselves in secluded places, making themselves hard to fathom. Who, then, could know them? Hence it is said that they were unfathomable.

The sky is so high that it cannot be measured all at once, and the earth so deep that it cannot be fully sounded. To say that the sky is round like a canopy and the earth square like a platform is merely to compare them by their shapes. Any attempt to describe the Dao can never truly probe its essence. What follows explains that the Dao is vast and difficult to know, and can only be described by approximation.

Those who cultivate the Dao are cautious, like someone crossing a river in winter, and alert, as though wary of the neighbors on every side.

Lü Jifu says: When Cook Ding butchered an ox, he first paused to take care. His gaze was intent, his movements slow, and he guided the knife with the utmost delicacy. This was like crossing a river in winter. “Yu” means planning ahead before an undertaking begins. Once the ox had been taken apart and the pieces of meat had fallen to the ground like clods of earth, Cook Ding stood holding his knife, looking around, lingering in quiet satisfaction. Then he wiped the knife clean and put it away. This was like being wary of the neighbors on every side. “You” means remaining cautious even after an undertaking is finished.

“Yu” means making plans before something has happened; “you” means continuing to feel some doubt even when things seem to have been settled. Water is called a “ford” when it rises above the knees, and a “river” where many streams come together. To cross a river is to face danger, and winter is the coldest season. Those who have reached the highest level in cultivating the Dao do not like to initiate affairs. They act only when they have no choice, and move only when compelled. They remain wary when faced with a task; hence the image of cautiously crossing a river in winter. Even after a task is complete, when there would normally be no more cause for concern, they still remind themselves to stay alert.

Those who have reached the highest level in cultivating the Dao are quiet and inward. They remain in the place where their nature finds repose, always guarded and restrained, like someone wary of the neighbors, never giving themselves free rein. They ward off improper thoughts and hold fast to sincerity. External things do not come seeking them, and their own intentions do not show themselves outwardly. Hence the image of being alert, as though wary of the neighbors on every side.

They are dignified and composed, like a guest.

Wang Yuanzhe says: Those who cultivate the Dao do not take worldly affairs upon themselves as their responsibility, and so their bearing is quiet and still.

纂微曰:言有道之士,俨然端谨而心无散乱,如宾对主,曷敢造次。 此作容字,说若东郭顺子正容悟物,使人之意也消。故田子方师仰之。此作客字,说若李含光居於暗室,如对君父,故司马子微激赏之。 涣若冰将释; 御注:水凝而为冰,冰释而为水,其实一体。蔽於执一者,如水之凝。同於大通者,如冰之释。《易》曰:涣,离也。离人而为冰,冰释而为水,其实一体。蔽於执一者,如水之凝。同於大通者,如冰之释。《易》曰:涣,离也。离人而无所系輆,所以为涣。 《说》曰:奂而散为涣。夫水本无冰,通寒则凝。性本无碍,有物则结。有道之士,豁然大悟,万事销亡,如春冰顿释。 敦兮其若朴; 御注:敦者厚之至。性本至厚,如木之朴,未散为器。 此言性之全也。《经》曰:复归於朴。 旷兮其若谷; 御注:旷者广之极。性原无际,如谷之虚,受而能应。 此言性之虚也。《经》曰:上德若谷。 浑兮其若浊。 王弼曰:藏精匿照,外不异物,混同 波尘,故曰若浊。
Interpretation

A person who has the Dao is solemn and upright, cautious and exacting. Their mind is free of distracting thoughts, like a guest facing a host: how could they act carelessly?

Some commentaries explain “solemn” as referring to dignified bearing. Dongguo Shunzi composed his bearing to transform others, dispelling the distracting thoughts in their hearts; for this reason, Tian Zifang admired him. Other commentaries explain it as the respectful care one shows a guest. When Li Hanguang was alone in a dark room, he remained as cautious as if standing before his ruler and father, which greatly impressed Sima Ziwei.

“Scattered, as though ice were about to melt”: the state of the Dao is like ice on the verge of melting. The Imperial Commentary says that water freezes into ice, and ice melts back into water; originally, they are one. To cling to a fixed understanding is like water freezing into ice; to become attuned to the Great Dao is like ice melting away. The Yijing says that “scattering” means dispersal. To let go of attachment, with no ties or obstructions, is to be “scattered.”

The Shuo explains that “huan” means to disperse, hence the word “scattered.” Water is not originally ice; only when it encounters cold does it freeze. Human nature is not originally obstructed; only when it encounters external things does it become blocked and stagnant. When a person who has the Dao awakens completely, all clinging to things dissolves, like spring ice melting in an instant.

“Solid, like uncarved wood”: solid and sincere, like wood that has not been carved. The Imperial Commentary says that “solid” means weighty to the utmost degree. Nature is originally whole and substantial, like wood before it has been fashioned into an object. This describes the complete state of nature. The Daodejing says, “Return to the uncarved simplicity.”

“Vast, like a valley”: open and spacious, like a valley. The Imperial Commentary says that “vast” means expansive to the utmost degree. Nature is originally without boundaries, like an empty valley: it can contain all things and respond to them as they come. This describes the emptiness and stillness of nature. The Daodejing says, “The highest De is like a valley.”

“Muddled, like turbid water”: undifferentiated, like muddy water. Wang Bi says that a person who has the Dao gathers in their brilliance and does not let it shine outward. Their appearance is no different from that of ordinary people; they seem to mingle with the dusty world. Hence, they are described as “like turbid water.” Yangzi says that when things come together, they form a muddled whole; when separated, they disperse.

杨子曰:合则浑,离则散。浑。《经》曰:上德若谷。 浑兮其若浊。 王弼曰:藏精匿照,外不异物,混同 波尘,故曰若浊。 杨子曰:合则浑,离则散。浑者与世合而不离,故若浊。庄子所谓与物委蛇而同其波也。与刻意尚行离世异俗者异矣。夫善为士者,冬涉不好从事,畏邻防患於后,若客之不为主,如冰释不凝滞,朴而能全,谷而能虚,浊不殊俗,此所谓深不可识,而强为之容也。 孰能浊以澄,静之徐清。 王元泽曰:澄性者与澄水同。加工则动而弥浊,唯静以俟之,则徐自清矣。有道之士,所以而强为之容也。 孰能浊以澄,静之徐清。 王元泽曰:澄性者与澄水同。加工则动而弥浊,唯静以俟之,则徐自清矣。有道之士,所以物莫能浊者,以其静之徐清耳。 曹道冲曰:岂随流而忘反,聊澄静以徐清。 孰能安以久,动之徐生。
Interpretation

Yang Zi said, “When things come together, they form an undivided whole; when separated, each disperses on its own. Those who blend with the world do not deliberately set themselves apart from ordinary life, so they seem muddied. This is what Zhuangzi meant by ‘following along with the myriad things and rising and falling together with them.’ They differ from those who deliberately refine themselves and prize their personal conduct, thereby withdrawing from the world and making themselves exceptional. Those truly adept at cultivating the Dao are cautious, like someone wading across a river in winter, and do not act rashly. They guard against calamity and prepare for consequences in advance. Like guests rather than hosts, they do not presume to take the lead. They are also like ice that melts and does not congeal again: plain and able to preserve their original nature, as empty as a valley. Though they seem muddied, they do not appear at odds with ordinary life. This is what is called being so profound as to defy understanding; one can only manage to sketch what such a person is like.”

“Who can let muddy water settle until it is clear? Only by becoming still can clarity gradually emerge.”

Wang Yuanze said, “Clarifying the mind and nature is like clarifying water. The more you work at it and stir it, the muddier the water becomes. Only by waiting quietly does it gradually grow clear. Those who have the Dao can describe this state only approximately because they understand this principle.”

“Who can let muddy water settle until it is clear? Only by becoming still can clarity gradually emerge.”

Wang Yuanze also said, “Clarifying the mind and nature is like clarifying water. The more you stir it, the muddier it becomes. Only by waiting quietly does it gradually grow clear. Those who have the Dao are not muddied by external things precisely because they can become still and let the mind and nature grow clear little by little.”

Cao Daochong said, “Must we drift with the current and forget to return? Better to quiet the mind and let ourselves gradually become clear.”

“Who can remain still and hold fast for long? Once one acts, vitality gradually appears.”

御注:有道之士,即动而静,时骋而要其宿,定而能应至,无而供其求,故静之徐清,而物莫能浊。动之徐生,而物莫能安。《易》曰;来徐徐,徐者安行而自适之意。至人之用心,非以静止为善,而有意於静。非以生出为功,而有为於生也。因其。动之徐生,而物莫能安。《易》曰;来徐徐,徐者安行而自适之意。至人之用心,非以静止为善,而有意於静。非以生出为功,而有为於生也。因其固然,付之自尔,而无怵迫之情,遑遽之劳焉。故曰:静之徐清,万物无足以挠其心,放孰能浊。动之除生,万物无足以系其虑,故孰能安。安有止之意,为物所系,则止矣。岂能应物而不伤。 保此道者不欲盈。 马巨济曰:保不歌盈者,道集虚故也。盈而有,有则浅可识矣。 夫惟不盈,. 吕吉甫曰:然不曰物而不伤。 保此道者不欲盈。 马巨济曰:保不歌盈者,道集虚故也。盈而有,有则浅可识矣。 夫惟不盈,. 吕吉甫曰:然不曰虚而每曰盈者,恐人之累於虚也。虚而累於虚,则不虚矣。故曰或不盈、不欲盈而已。 故能弊不新成。
Interpretation

The imperial commentary says: A person who has the Dao can remain inwardly calm while acting, unfolding freely at every moment without losing sight of where he belongs. At rest, he can still respond to change; he is empty and unattached, yet able to meet what things require. Thus, when he settles into stillness, he gradually becomes clear, and nothing can cloud his mind. When he acts, he gives rise to things in keeping with their natural course, and nothing can make him remain fixed and unmoving.

The Book of Changes says, “It comes slowly.” Here, “slowly” means proceeding with ease and composure, at peace with oneself. The Perfected Person, whose cultivation has reached a profound level, does not regard sheer stillness as good, nor deliberately pursue quiet. He does not claim as his own achievement the bringing forth of the myriad things, nor does he deliberately control that process. He simply follows the natural condition of things, allowing them to unfold on their own. He is not alarmed by urgency or exhausted by haste.

Thus, when he settles into stillness, he gradually becomes clear. Nothing among the myriad things can disturb his mind—what, then, could cloud it? When he acts, he gives rise to things in keeping with their natural course. Nothing among the myriad things can entangle his thoughts—what, then, could make him stagnate? “At rest” can mean coming to a halt. If he is held back by external things, he will stop. How, then, could he respond to the myriad things without being harmed?

“One who keeps to this Dao does not seek fullness.”

Ma Jiji says: One who keeps to the Dao does not seek fullness because the Dao takes emptiness as its foundation. If one becomes full and possesses things, one becomes easy for others to see through.

“Precisely because he does not seek fullness…”

Lü Jifu says: This passage does not say “empty,” but repeatedly says “not full,” for fear that people will cling to “emptiness.” If emptiness itself becomes something one clings to, it is no longer true emptiness. That is why it says only “perhaps not full” and “does not seek fullness.”

In this way, old things can be prevented from growing into new troubles.

王元泽曰:得道者未尝盈,则成道者未尝新也。道之为用,通万世,而不弊,以其无弊、无新、不成、不败故也。弊生於新,败生於成,士虽成道,而常若弊,则终无弊败矣。 此章言士之体道,深不可识,终之以不欲盈者虚也。虚则空洞无一物,』了世岂得而识之哉。古之保此道者,若大禹不自满假,孔子不居其圣已。独取虚者,老子也。实若虚者,颜子也。惟道集虚,於此可见。 致虚极章第十六 致虚极,守静笃。 御注:莫贵乎虚,莫善乎静。虚静者,万物之本也。虚故足以受群实,静故足以应群动。。 御注:莫贵乎虚,莫善乎静。虚静者,万物之本也。虚故足以受群实,静故足以应群动。极者众会而有所至,笃者立行而有所至,政虚而要其极,守静而至於笃,则万态虽杂而吾心常彻,万变虽殊而吾心常寂,此之谓天乐。非体道者。不足以与此。 锺会曰:致,至也。除情虑至虚极也。心常寂守静笃也。 致虚则若谷能受群实,无一尘之积,可谓极矣。守静则若水能应群动,无一毫之撄,可谓篇矣。 万物并作,吾以观其复。
Interpretation

Wang Yuanze says: Those who attain the Dao are never self-satisfied. Thus, those who realize the Dao do not regard themselves as entirely new and independent beings. The Dao operates throughout the ages and never declines, because it has no decay and does not think itself accomplished; therefore, it cannot be ruined. Decline often arises from thinking oneself newly born, and ruin often arises from thinking oneself successful. Even when cultivators of the Dao achieve something, they still often regard themselves as though they were in decline, and in the end they do not decline.

This chapter speaks of cultivators who, having realized the Great Dao, reach a state so profound that it is difficult to fathom. Its closing phrase, “not wishing to be full,” means not seeking self-satisfaction, but remaining empty. In emptiness there is no fixed thing, so how could people see through it? Among the ancients who upheld this Dao, Yu the Great was neither self-satisfied nor arrogant, and Confucius did not claim to be a sage. Laozi best embodied an open and humble mind; Yan Hui was outwardly abundant yet inwardly modest. This shows what is meant by “the Dao gathers in emptiness.”

Chapter Sixteen: Reaching the Utmost Void

Bring the mind to the utmost emptiness, and steadfastly maintain profound stillness.

The Imperial Commentary says: Nothing is more precious than emptiness, and nothing is better than stillness. Emptiness and stillness are the root of all things. Because of emptiness, all that is substantial can be accommodated; because of stillness, all movement and change can be met.

“Utmost” is the point at which all affairs converge; “steadfast” is the state reached through firm practice. Bring the mind’s emptiness to its furthest point and maintain stillness in its deepest state: then, though the myriad conditions of the outside world are tangled and diverse, the mind remains clear and open; though the changes of all things differ, the mind remains peaceful and still. This is called “heavenly joy,” the ease that accords with nature. Those who have not truly realized the Great Dao cannot reach this state.

Zhong Hui says: “Reaching” means arriving at a state. Set aside emotions and thoughts, and bring the mind to complete emptiness; let the mind remain still at all times, and so maintain stillness in its depth.

To reach emptiness is to be like a valley, able to hold all things without retaining even a speck of dust: this may be called reaching the utmost. To maintain stillness is to be like water, able to meet every kind of activity without the slightest disturbance: this may be called reaching profound depth.

All things grow and move together; from this I observe how they return to their source.

Yan Zun says: Heaven and earth endure because they move in cycles of coming and going. After sleep and rest, people recover their clarity. When dragons and snakes reach the height of their flourishing, they too return to a hidden state.

严遵曰:天地反覆,故能久长。人复寝寐,故能聪明。龙蛇复极矣。守静则若水能应群动,无一毫之撄,可谓篇矣。 万物并作,吾以观其复。 严遵曰:天地反覆,故能久长。人复寝寐,故能聪明。龙蛇复垫,故能章章。草木复本,故能青青。化复则神明得位,与虚无通,魂休魄静,各得其所安,志宁气顺,血脉和平,此皆暂尔复静,犹能精神,况久归至道者乎。 吾者命物之我也。我以虚静之至,观万物之作,命物而不与物俱化,故曰吾以观其复。 夫物芸芸,各复归其根。 温公曰:物出於无,复入於无。 王元泽曰:从性起用,复还性根,动植虽殊,理归一致。 归根曰静, 苏子由曰:苟未能自复於性,虽止动息念以求静,非静也。故惟归根,然后为静。 人生而静,天之性也。复性则静。 静曰复命,
Interpretation

Yan Zun says: Heaven and Earth revolve and return, and so they endure. After sleep and rest, a person’s spirit is restored, and the ears hear clearly and the eyes see sharply. When dragons and snakes lie hidden and recuperate, they later emerge full of vitality; when plants and trees return to their roots and store up life force, they grow green again. After all things transform, they return to their roots. The spirits then settle in their proper places and connect with emptiness. The hun and po souls are restored and at peace, each dwelling in its proper place; the mind is calm, the breath flows smoothly, and the blood vessels are in harmony. These are only temporary returns to stillness, yet they can restore the spirit. How much more so when one returns for a long time to the utmost Dao?

“Self” refers to the “I” that can govern and observe all things. With utmost emptiness and stillness, I observe the arising and transformation of all things. Though I can perceive them, I do not change along with them. Thus it is said: “From this, I observe how all things return to their root.”

All things flourish, and each must return to its root.

Wen Gong says: All things arise from “nonbeing” and ultimately return to “nonbeing.”

Wang Yuanze says: All things bring forth their functions from their nature, and ultimately return to that nature as their root. Though animals and plants differ, the principle they follow is the same.

Returning to the root is called “stillness.”

Su Ziyou says: If one cannot return one’s nature to its root, then even stopping one’s activities and quieting distracting thoughts in pursuit of calm is not true stillness. Only returning to the root can be called stillness.

At birth, people are originally still; this is the nature bestowed by Heaven. Restoring one’s nature brings one back to stillness.

This stillness is called “returning to life’s mandate”—that is, returning to life’s original state.

Lu Dian says: The “root” refers to one’s nature. If one cannot return one’s nature to its root, then even stopping one’s activities and quieting distracting thoughts in pursuit of calm is not true stillness; only returning to the root is true stillness. At birth, people are originally still; this is the nature bestowed by Heaven. Restoring one’s nature brings one back to stillness. This stillness is called “returning to life’s mandate.”

陆佃曰:言根曰:苟未能自复於性,虽止动息念以求静,非静也。故惟归根,然后为静。 人生而静,天之性也。复性则静。 静曰复命, 陆佃曰:言根则知有所谓本,言命则知有所谓性,故言归根曰静,则复者本也。静曰复命,则归根者性也。庄子曰:自本自根,未有天地,自古以固存。自根者,归根曰静是也。自本者,静曰复命是也。自古者,复命曰常是也。自本者,无所因於本。自根者,无所出於根。自古者,无所历於古。虽然归根曰静,静曰复命,复命曰常,其本一也。其言先根而后本,先性而后命,而於根则谓之归,於命则,静曰复命,复命曰常,其本一也。其言先根而后本,先性而后命,而於根则谓之归,於命则谓之复者,辞之序尔。归未至也。复则至矣。根未至也。命则至矣。复之所入深矣。 复命曰常。 王元泽曰:出生则入有,入有则系数,然则密移之变,顷刻不停,惟复命则湛然常寂,物莫能迁。 从道受生之谓命,复命则反其所自生,与道为一,则亘古今而常存。 知常曰明。 舒王曰:常者乃无始已来不变之称也。知其常则谓之明也。 自道之外皆非常也。道虽真常,无形无名,非有乃无始已来不变之称也。知其常则谓之明也。 自道之外皆非常也。道虽真常,无形无名,非有自知之明,鲜有不为物蔽者矣。 不知常,妄作凶,
Interpretation

Lu Dian says that when we speak of a “root,” we know there is also what is called a “basis”; when we speak of “life-destiny,” we know there is also what is called “nature.” Thus, “Returning to the root is called stillness”: here, “returning” means going back to the basis. “Stillness is called returning to life-destiny” means that “returning to the root” is a return to one’s original nature.

The Zhuangzi says, “Rooted in itself and based in itself, it existed firmly from ancient times, before there was Heaven and Earth.” Here, “rooted in itself” refers to “Returning to the root is called stillness”; “based in itself” refers to “Stillness is called returning to life-destiny”; and “from ancient times” refers to “Returning to life-destiny is called constancy.” To be “based in itself” means that it depends on no other basis. To be “rooted in itself” means that it did not arise from some source. To exist “from ancient times” means that it has never passed through any earlier past.

Although the scripture says, “Returning to the root is called stillness; stillness is called returning to life-destiny; returning to life-destiny is called constancy,” all three phrases ultimately refer to the same root. The root is mentioned first and the basis afterward; nature comes first and life-destiny second—this is simply the order of the wording. “Return” suggests that one has not yet arrived, while “revert” suggests that one has arrived. “Root” does not yet reach the ultimate point; “life-destiny” is the ultimate destination. The state entered through “reverting” is profound.

“Returning to life-destiny is called constancy.”

Wang Yuanze says that at birth, a person enters the world of form and things. Once in this world, they are subject to the decrees of life-destiny. As a result, subtle, ceaseless change never pauses, even for an instant. Only by returning to one’s original life-destiny can one attain a clear, settled, and perpetually still state that external things cannot alter.

To receive life from the Dao is called “life-destiny.” To return to life-destiny is to go back to the place from which life originally came and become one with the Dao. Then one can endure through all ages, past and present.

“Knowing constancy is called clarity.”

Prince Shu says that “constancy” means remaining unchanged from time without beginning. Recognizing this constancy is called “clarity.”

Nothing apart from the Dao is constant. Though the Dao is real and constant, it has neither form nor name. Without this understanding, few can avoid being misled by external things.

“Not knowing constancy, one acts recklessly and brings misfortune.”

御注:圣人知道之常,故作则契理每与吉会。不知常者,随物转徙,触途自患,且不足以固其命,故凶。 孙登曰:不能归根守静,则夭命失常,是其凶也。 夫众不知道之真常,以妄为常,故欢乐用生,动而失之,寿命竭矣。所谓妄作凶也。 知常容, 苏子由曰:方迷於妄,则自是而非,彼物皆吾敌,吾何以容之,苟知其皆妄,则虽仇雠犹将哀而怜之,夫何所不容哉。 容乃公, 河上公曰:无所不包容,则公正无私,众邪莫,则虽仇雠犹将哀而怜之,夫何所不容哉。 容乃公, 河上公曰:无所不包容,则公正无私,众邪莫当。 《礼记》曰:大道之行,天下为公。人不独亲其亲,子其子。 公乃王, 舒王曰:背私则为公,尽制则为王。公者,德也。王者,业也。以德则隐而内,以业则显而外。公与王合,内外之道也。 成玄英曰:王,往也。公则物皆归往。 王乃天, 王元泽曰:王者,人道之至极。极人之道,乃通於天。 天乃道, 御注:通天地人而位乎天地之中者,王也。一而大在上而无不覆者,天也。天地人莫不由之者,道也。尽人则同乎天,体天则同乎道。 道乃久,
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary says that sages understand the “constant Dao,” the eternal and unchanging principle. They therefore conduct themselves and act in accordance with reason, and often encounter good fortune. Those who do not understand the constant Dao change with external things, inviting misfortune at every turn. They cannot preserve their lives and so meet with danger.

Sun Deng says that if one cannot return to the root and maintain stillness, one’s lifespan will be diminished and the constant Dao lost. This is what brings danger.

Most people do not understand the true meaning of the constant Dao. Instead, they take what is deluded and illusory to be normal. They crave pleasure and act recklessly, ultimately straying from the constant Dao and exhausting their lives. This is “reckless action brings danger.”

Understanding constancy brings tolerance.

Su Ziyou says that when people are lost in delusion, they think themselves right and regard others and all things as adversaries. How could they make room for them? But if they understand that all attachments are illusory, then even when facing an enemy they will feel compassion. What, then, could they not tolerate?

Tolerance brings impartiality.

Heshang Gong says that one who can embrace all things can be impartial, and then no kind of evil can stand against them.

The Book of Rites says: “When the Great Dao prevailed, all under Heaven belonged to everyone. People honored not only their own parents, but also the parents of others as elders; they cared not only for their own children, but also treated the children of others as their own.”

Impartiality brings the way of the king.

Prince Shu says that abandoning selfishness makes one impartial, and fully bringing this virtue to bear makes kingly rule possible. Impartiality is virtue; kingship is achievement. Virtue is held within the heart, while kingly achievement is displayed outwardly. Their union shows how inner virtue and outward achievement are joined.

Cheng Xuanying says that “king” also means “to which all return.” When one is impartial, all things come to one.

The way of the king reaches Heaven.

Wang Yuanze says that kingship is the highest state attainable through the human way. By bringing the human way to its fullest, one can reach the way of Heaven.

Heaven is one with the Dao.

The Imperial Commentary says that the king is one who unites Heaven, Earth, and humanity, standing among them; Heaven is unified and vast, elevated above and covering all things; and the Dao is what Heaven, Earth, and humanity all follow. Bring the human way to its fullest, and it becomes one with Heaven. Understand and follow Heaven, and one becomes one with the Dao.

Only by joining with the Dao can one endure.

卢裕曰:久,长久也。谓量等太虚,无来无去,心冥至极,不生不灭,冥混自然,不可分别,既与此理契会义说为久。 没身不殆。 《新说》曰:天之所法者,道也。故曰天乃道。道则无古无今,故曰道乃久。夫道至於为久。 没身不殆。 《新说》曰:天之所法者,道也。故曰天乃道。道则无古无今,故曰道乃久。夫道至於久而可以没身不殆,其孰能政於此哉。 此章以归根复命为义,故首言虚静,终之以道乃久者,道以虚静为先,若拾此而入道,譬若舍舟航而济乎渎者,末矣。 太上章第十七 太上,下知有之。 王元泽曰:三皇之世,无为而治,使民各遂而不知其然,岂得而亲誉乎。 马巨济曰:知有君而不知有其君,此三皇之世。庄子所谓有泰氏其卧徐徐,其觉于于,一以已为马,一以已为牛。 太上者,谓太古无名号之君也。太者,极大之名。上者,至高之称。无为之治,至大至高,后已为牛。 太上者,谓太古无名号之君也。太者,极大之名。上者,至高之称。无为之治,至大至高,后世无以尚之,故曰太上也。下知有之者,知有君而不臣事也。 其次,亲之,誉之。
Interpretation

Lu Yu says, “‘Enduring’ means lasting for a long time. The realm of the Dao is vast and boundless, like the great emptiness; it has neither coming nor going. When the mind accords with the utmost realm, it neither arises nor perishes, but merges completely with nature, with no distinction between them. To accord with this principle is called ‘enduring.’”

“His whole life free from danger” means that he remains free from danger until the end of his life.

The New Explanation says: “Heaven takes the Dao as its model, hence ‘Heaven is the Dao.’ The Dao makes no distinction between past and present, hence ‘the Dao is enduring.’ When the Dao reaches the state of endurance, people too can remain free from danger throughout their lives. Who can achieve this?”

This chapter centers on “returning to the root and restoring one’s original nature.” It therefore begins by speaking of emptiness and stillness, and concludes with “the Dao is enduring.” Emptiness and stillness are the root of the Dao. To abandon them and try to enter the Dao is like leaving a boat behind and attempting to cross a river on foot: it is the wrong way.

Chapter Seventeen of the Supreme Classic

The highest kind of ruler is one whose existence the people merely know of.

Wang Yuanze says: “In the age of the Three Sovereigns, the ruler governed through Wuwei, allowing the people to live as each wished, yet they did not know how this came about. How could such a ruler be cherished and praised by the people?”

Ma Jiji says: “The people knew that a ruler existed, but did not feel that they were serving him. This was the situation in the age of the Three Sovereigns. The ‘You Tai clan’ described by Zhuangzi slept peacefully and awoke at ease; at one moment they saw themselves as horses, at another as oxen. This portrays a state of following nature, wholly unaware.”

“Supreme” refers to the nameless rulers of high antiquity. “Supreme” conveys greatness without limit, while “highest” means loftiest. Their Wuwei governance reached the greatest and loftiest state, which later generations could not surpass; hence they were called “supreme.” “The people merely know of his existence” means that the people knew there was a ruler, but did not feel themselves to be under his rule.

The next kind of ruler is one whom the people cherish and praise.

马巨济曰:惠爱,仁也,故亲。赏罚,义也,故誉。然亲之固已疏,誉之固已毁矣,何者未能出於非人故也。此二帝之世。庄子曰:有虞氏不及泰氏。 尧仁如天,就之者如曰。舜至邓墟,来之者十万家,亲之也。康衢誉尧,讴歌与舜,誉之也。 其次,畏之,侮之。 纂微曰不及泰氏。 尧仁如天,就之者如曰。舜至邓墟,来之者十万家,亲之也。康衢誉尧,讴歌与舜,誉之也。 其次,畏之,侮之。 纂微曰:仁义失则刑法立,而民畏之。 马巨济曰:此三王之世。庄子曰:施及三王而天下大骇,好智而百姓竭,於是椎凿央焉。智慧极,大伪生,巧役其下,愚侮其上,而刑罚不足以威惩,此五霸之世。孟子曰:五霸假之也。 王元泽曰:失德无政,则民侮之。 信不足,有不信。 御注:附离不以胶漆,约束不以缠索,此至信也。商人作誓而民始畔,周人作会而民始疑,信不足故也。太上下知有之,则当不知以为信。其次畏之,侮之,则知诈。颉滑机变之巧生,而有不信者矣。 唐明皇曰:畏之侮之者,皆由君信不足,故令下有不信之人。 犹其贵言。 唐明皇曰:亲之誉之,由君有畏之侮之者,皆由君信不足,故令下有不信之人。 犹其贵言。
Interpretation

Ma JujI said, “Kindness and care belong to benevolence, so the people grow close to their ruler. Rewards and punishments belong to righteousness, so the people praise their ruler. Yet once a ruler governs by relying on affection and praise, the bond between ruler and people has already grown distant, and praise has already been corrupted. Why is this so? Because such rule has still not transcended human contrivance. This refers to the age of the two emperors Yao and Shun. Zhuangzi said, ‘The Yu clan (Shun) did not measure up to Tai Shi, the ancient ruler of natural simplicity.’”

Yao’s benevolence and virtue were as vast as the sky, and the people drew close to him as they would to the sun. When Shun went to Dengxu, a place name, a hundred thousand households followed him. This was the people drawing close to him. People praised Yao along the great roads that ran in every direction, and sang songs in praise of Shun. This was the people praising them.

After this, the people came to fear their ruler, or even to despise him.

The Zuanwei explains: “‘Did not measure up to Tai Shi.’ Yao’s benevolence and virtue were as vast as the sky, and the people drew close to him as they would to the sun. When Shun went to Dengxu, a hundred thousand households followed him. This was the people drawing close to him. People praised Yao along the great roads, and sang songs in praise of Shun. This was the people praising them.

“After this, the people came to fear their ruler, or even to despise him.”

The Zuanwei says: When benevolence and righteousness decline and are lost, penal laws are established, and the people consequently fear their ruler.

Ma JujI said: This refers to the rulers of the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties. Zhuangzi said, “In the age of the Three Kings, the world was greatly shaken. The rulers prized cleverness, and the people were worn out by the effort it demanded; so ingenious methods, like drilling holes and carving passages, arose one after another.” When intelligence develops to its extreme, profound hypocrisy follows. If rulers use deceit and cunning to force the people into service, the people in turn fool and despise their rulers. Punishments are not enough to make them afraid or repent. This refers to the age of the Five Hegemons of the Spring and Autumn period. Mencius said, “The Five Hegemons merely acted in the name of benevolence and righteousness.”

Wang Yuanze said: When a ruler loses virtue and fails to issue proper commands, the people despise him.

When trust is insufficient, the people do not trust their ruler.

The Imperial Commentary says: To be closely joined without glue or lacquer, and to keep an agreement without being bound by ropes—this is true trust. After people in the Shang swore oaths, the people began to betray one another; after people in the Zhou made covenants, the people began to doubt one another. Both were cases of trust being insufficient. The best ruler governs the world, and the people know only that he exists; they do not feel that he is deliberately demanding their trust. When the people come to fear or despise their ruler, it shows that deceit has entered the relationship between ruler and people. Smooth cunning and expedient tactics then multiply, and the people no longer trust their ruler.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang said: When the people fear or despise their ruler, it is because the ruler lacks trustworthiness, and this causes ruler and subjects to distrust one another.

A ruler must also value his words and be careful in issuing commands.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang added: When the people draw close to and praise their ruler, it shows that he governs well. When they fear or despise him, it is because he lacks trustworthiness and has caused ruler and subjects to lose trust in one another. A ruler must also value his words and be careful in issuing commands.

唐明皇曰:亲之誉之,由君有德教之言,故贵其言而亲誉之。 马巨济曰:言不足贵而犹贵之,故曰犹盖太上,不言而化。自兹以降,帝有典谟,王有誓诰也。 功成事遂,百姓谓:我自然。 御注:帝王之功,圣人之余事也。使人甘其食,美其服,安其居,乐其业,而余事足以成帝王之功。然谓我自然而已。曰:帝力何有於我哉,此谓太上之治。 唐明皇曰:功成而不执,事遂而无为,百姓谓我自如然也。上力何与焉。 此章言三五殊化,下民风靡,道降为德,德衰用刑,刑不能制,必至於欺侮。此
Interpretation

Emperor Tang Xuanzong said: The people draw close to and praise their ruler because he guides them with words of virtuous instruction. The people therefore value those words and draw close to and praise the ruler.

Ma Jiji said: A ruler’s words are not inherently worthy of esteem, yet the people still esteem them. This shows that the finest governance is when the ruler issues few commands and the people are naturally transformed. From then on, emperors began to establish statutes and instructions, while feudal lords also had oaths and proclamations.

When affairs were settled and achievements completed, the people all said, “We were simply like this all along.”

The Imperial Commentary says: The achievements of emperors are matters that sages accomplish incidentally while governing the world. If the people have food that suits their tastes, clothes that meet their needs, secure homes, and take pleasure in their livelihoods, then the rest will naturally suffice to bring about the ruler’s achievements. Yet the people will only say that they did it all of their own accord. They will ask, “What does the ruler’s power have to do with us?” This is the finest governance.

Emperor Tang Xuanzong said: Once achievements are complete, the ruler does not claim them as his own; once affairs are settled, he does not act deliberately. The people then believe everything happened naturally. What, after all, does the ruler’s power have to do with them?

This chapter discusses how the methods of governance differed across the dynasties, and how the people’s customs changed accordingly. When the Dao declined, governance turned to De; when De declined further, punishments began to be used. When punishments still could not restrain the people, matters eventually developed into deceit and transgression. Such is indeed how things unfold.

信不

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback