中文 · EN

《淮南鸿烈解》Vol. 8

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 Vol. 8 / 11 25,000 characters

About this page. The original text of 《淮南鸿烈解》 Vol. 8 (Taixuan 太玄部, 11 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 36 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《淮南鸿烈解》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

子嗜鱼,弗受,何也?答曰,夫唯嗜鱼,故弗受。夫受鱼而免於相,虽嗜鱼,不能自给鱼。毋受鱼而不免於相,则能长自给鱼。此明於为人为己者也。故老子曰,后(具相,虽嗜鱼,不能自给鱼。毋受鱼而不免於相,则能长自给鱼。此明於为人为己者也。故老子曰,后(具)[其]16身而身先,外其身而身存。非以其无私邪?故能成其私。一曰知足不辱。 狐丘丈人谓孙叔敖丈人,老而杖於人者。曰,人有三怨,子知之乎?孙叔敖曰,何谓也。对曰,爵高者士妬之,官大者主恶之,禄厚者怨处之。孙叔敖曰,吾爵益高,吾志益下;吾官益大,吾心益小;吾禄益厚,吾施益博。是以免三怨,可乎?故老子曰,贵必以贱为本,高必以下为基。 大司马捶视果反。钩者年八十矣,捶,锻击也。钩,钓钩也。而不失钩芒。大司马曰,子巧邪?有道邪?曰,臣有守也。臣年二十好捶钩,於物无视也,非钩无察也。是以用之者,必假於弗用也,而以长得其用。而况持不用者乎,物孰不济焉。故老子曰,从事於道者,同於道。
Interpretation

A man was fond of eating fish, yet refused to accept fish offered to him. Why? The answer is that he refused precisely because he loved eating fish. If he accepted the fish and thereby lost his position as chancellor, he might love fish, but he would no longer be able to provide it for himself over the long term. By refusing the gift and keeping his office, he could continue to supply himself with fish for years to come. This shows that in conducting oneself in the world, one should take one’s long-term interests into account. Thus the Laozi says, “Put yourself behind, and you will come to the front; put yourself beyond concern, and you will preserve yourself.” Is this not a case of setting aside selfish motives and thereby securing one’s own interests? Another saying puts it this way: “Those who know contentment will not suffer humiliation.”

The elder Hugu Qiu—an old man who walked with a staff—said to Sun Shuao, “Do you know the three misfortunes that bring resentment upon a person?” Sun Shuao asked, “What are they?” Hugu Qiu replied, “When your rank is high, scholars will envy you; when your office is great, your ruler may dislike you; when your stipend is generous, resentment will gather around you.” Sun Shuao said, “The higher my rank, the more humble my aims; the greater my office, the more cautious my mind; the larger my stipend, the more widely I give. In this way, can I avoid those three misfortunes?” Thus the Laozi says, “The noble must take the lowly as its root; the lofty must take what lies below as its foundation.”

The Grand Marshal once encountered an old man hammering out fishing hooks. The man was already eighty, yet he still made each hook with perfect accuracy. The Grand Marshal asked, “Are you especially skilled, or have you mastered some particular method?” The old man replied, “I have a way of concentrating my attention. Since I was twenty, I have loved forging hooks. Whenever I do this work, I look at nothing else; I attend only to the hook. Thus, to make use of something, one must first know how not to be burdened by it; only then can one make use of it over time. How much more so if one can maintain this attitude of nonattachment? What, then, could one fail to accomplish?” Thus the Laozi says, “Those who engage themselves in the Dao become one with the Dao.”

文王砥德修弗用也,而以长得其用。而况持不用者乎,物孰不济焉。故老子曰,从事於道者,同於道。 文王砥德修政,三年而天下二垂归之。砥,砺也。文王三分天下有其二。纣闻而患之曰,余夙兴夜寐,与之竞行,则苦心劳形。纵而置之,恐伐余一人。崇侯虎曰,周伯昌行仁义而善谋,太子发勇敢而不疑,中子旦恭俭而知时。若与之从,则不堪其殃。纵而赦之,身必危亡。冠虽弊,必加於头。及未成,请图之。屈商乃拘文王於羑里。屈商,纣臣也。羑里,地名也。在河内汤阴。於是冠虽弊,必加於头。及未成,请图之。屈商乃拘文王於羑里。屈商,纣臣也。羑里,地名也。在河内汤阴。於是散宜生乃以千金求天下之珍怪,得绉虞、鸡斯之乘,驺虞,白虎黑文而仁,食自死之兽,日行千里。鸡斯,神马也。玄玉百工,二玉为一工也。大贝百朋,五贝为一朋也。玄豹、黄罴、青犴、音岸。杆,胡地野犬也。白虎文皮千合,以献於纣,因费仲而通。费仲,纣佞臣也。纣见而说之,乃免其身,杀牛而赐之。文王归,乃为玉门,筑灵台,相女童,击钟鼓,玉门,以玉饰门,为柱枢也。相女童,相视之。一曰,相匠也。以待纣之失也。纣闻之,曰,周伯昌改道易行,吾无忧矣。乃为炮烙,剖比干,剔孕妇,杀谏者。文王乃遂其谋。故老子曰,知其荣,守其辱,为也。纣闻之,曰,周伯昌改道易行,吾无忧矣。乃为炮烙,剖比干,剔孕妇,杀谏者。文王乃遂其谋。故老子曰,知其荣,守其辱,为天下谷。
Interpretation

King Wen of Zhou (Ji Chang) cultivated his virtue and put government affairs in order. After three years, nearly two-thirds of the feudal lords under Heaven had submitted to him. “To hone” means to polish and refine. King Wen controlled two-thirds of the realm’s territory.

When King Zhou heard this, he grew anxious and said, “If I rise early and retire late, matching his efforts in governing, I will exhaust myself. But if I let matters take their course, I fear he will attack me.” Chong Houhu advised him: “Count Bochang of Zhou practices benevolence and righteousness and is skilled at planning. The Crown Prince Fa is brave and decisive; his second son, Dan, is respectful and frugal, and understands the times. If you let them continue to grow, you will be unable to withstand the trouble they bring. If you spare King Wen, you will surely put yourself in danger. Even if a hat is worn out, one still has to wear it on one’s head. While their power has not yet grown, quickly find a way to deal with them.” So Qu Shang, a minister of King Zhou, imprisoned King Wen at Youli, a place in Tangyin, Henei.

To rescue King Wen, San Yisheng spent a thousand units of gold searching throughout the realm for rare treasures. He obtained the Zouyu, a legendary white tiger with black markings, said to be gentle and to eat only animals that had died naturally, and to travel a thousand li in a day; Jisi, a divine steed; as well as dark jade, shells made by skilled artisans, large cowrie shells, a black leopard, a yellow bear, a blue wild dog, and white tiger skins. The phrases “two pieces of jade make one gong” and “five shells make one peng” refer to units used at the time for measuring precious objects. San Yisheng presented these gifts to King Zhou and used Fei Zhong, one of the king’s sycophantic ministers, to smooth the way. Delighted by what he saw, King Zhou released King Wen and even had an ox slaughtered for him.

After returning, King Wen built a gate adorned with jade and a spirit tower, selected young women, and had bells and drums played. He did this while waiting for the moment when King Zhou would lose the people’s support. The phrase “examined the young women” has two interpretations: one is that he selected and inspected young women; the other is that he inspected the craftsmen.

When King Zhou heard of these things, he said, “Count Bochang of Zhou has changed his course and his methods, so I have nothing more to worry about.” He then imposed the punishment of roasting people over a heated bronze pillar, cut open Bi Gan’s chest to examine his heart, cut open pregnant women’s bellies, and killed those who remonstrated with him. King Wen therefore continued to advance his plans.

That is why the Laozi says: “Know what is glorious, yet remain steadfast in disgrace; willingly take the lower position, and you can become the valley of the world.”

成王问政於尹佚曰,吾何德之行,尹佚,史佚。而民亲其上。对曰,使之时,而敬顺之。王曰,其度安(至)[在]17?曰,如临深渊,如履薄冰。王曰,惧哉,王人乎。尹佚曰,天地之间,四海之内,善之则吾畜也,不善则吾雠也。昔夏、商之臣反雠桀、纣而臣汤、武,宿沙之民皆自攻其君而归神农,伏羲、神农之间,有共工、宿沙,羁天下者也。此世之所明知也。如何其攻其君而归神农,伏羲、神农之间,有共工、宿沙,羁天下者也。此世之所明知也。如何其无惧也。故老子曰,人之所畏,不可不畏也。 跖之徒问跖曰,盗亦有道乎?跖曰,奚适其无道也。夫意而中藏者,圣也;入先者,勇也;出后者,义也;分均者,仁也;知可否者,智也。五者不备而能成大盗者,天下无之。由此观之,盗贼之心,必托圣人之道而后可行。故老子曰,绝圣弃智,民利百倍。
Interpretation

King Cheng of Zhou consulted Yin Yi, the court historian, on the Dao of governing the state: “How should I put virtuous rule into practice so that the people will feel close to their ruler?” Yin Yi replied, “Have the people work at the proper times, and govern them with respect and gentleness.”

King Cheng asked, “Where should the principles of government be placed?” Yin Yi said, “Be as cautious as if standing at the edge of an abyss or walking on thin ice.” The king sighed, “Being a ruler is truly worrying!” Yin Yi replied, “Between Heaven and Earth, throughout the Four Seas, if a ruler treats the people well, they will be his support; if he treats them poorly, they will become his enemies. In the past, the people of the Xia and Shang turned their backs on Jie and Zhou and submitted instead to Kings Tang and Wu. The people of Shusha, too, once attacked their ruler and joined Shennong. Between Fuxi and Shennong, figures such as Gonggong and Shusha also ruled the world. These are all well-known events. Since the people may attack their ruler and turn to someone else, how can a ruler fail to be cautious? Thus the Laozi says: ‘What people fear, a ruler cannot help but fear as well.’”

A disciple of Zhi asked him, “Does being a bandit also have its Dao?” Zhi replied, “What occupation does not have its own principles? Being able to predict and locate where valuables are hidden is ‘sagacity’; being the first to go in is ‘courage’; being the last to withdraw is ‘righteousness’; dividing the spoils equally is ‘benevolence’; knowing whether an opportunity is worth taking is ‘wisdom.’ None of these five abilities can be missing. Only with all of them can one become a great bandit. It follows that even bandits must rely on the principles taught by the sages to accomplish their aims. Thus the Laozi says: ‘Cast aside what is called sagacity and cleverness, and the people will gain a hundredfold.’”

楚将子发好求技道之士,楚有善为偷者往见,曰,闻君求技道之士,臣偷也,愿以技赍一卒。赍,备,卒,足。子发闻之,衣不给带,冠不暇正,出见而礼之。左右谏曰,偷者,天下之盗也,何为之礼。君曰,此非左右之所得与。后无几何,齐兴兵伐楚。子发将师以当之,兵三却。楚贤良大夫皆尽其计而悉其诚,齐师愈强。於是市偷进请曰,臣有几何,齐兴兵伐楚。子发将师以当之,兵三却。楚贤良大夫皆尽其计而悉其诚,齐师愈强。於是市偷进请曰,臣有薄技,愿为君行之。子发曰,诺。不问其辞而遣之。偷则夜解齐将军之帱帐而献之。子发因使人归之,曰,卒有出薪者,得将军之帷,使归之於执事。明又复往取其枕,子发又使人归之。明日又复往取其簪,子发又使归之。齐师闻之,大骇,将军与军吏谋曰,今日不去,楚君恐取吾头。则还师而去。故曰无细而能薄,在人君用之耳。故老子曰,不善人,善人之资也。
Interpretation

The Chu general Zifa liked to gather people with unusual abilities around him. A skilled thief from Chu came to see him and said, “I hear that you are seeking people with talents. I know how to steal, and I am willing to serve you with this skill.” When Zifa heard this, he went out to welcome him before he had even fastened his belt or straightened his hat, and treated him with respect.

Those around him urged him, “A thief is a robber of the realm. Why are you treating him with such courtesy?” Zifa replied, “This is something you cannot understand.”

Before long, Qi sent troops to attack Chu. Zifa led his army to meet them, but the Chu forces were driven back three times in succession. Chu’s worthy ministers exhausted their strategies and offered all their sincerity, yet the Qi army continued to grow stronger.

At that point, the skilled thief stepped forward and asked to be given a task. “I have a small skill,” he said. “I am willing to put it to use for you.” Zifa agreed. Without asking what he planned to do, he sent him off.

That night, the thief took down the Qi commander’s canopy—the tent used in camp for shelter and enclosure—and brought it back. Zifa immediately sent someone to return it, with this message: “Some soldiers out gathering firewood found your canopy and have brought it back to you.” The next day, the thief went again and took the commander’s pillow. Once more, Zifa sent someone to return it. A day later, the thief took the commander’s hairpin, and Zifa again had it sent back.

When the Qi army heard what had happened, they were greatly alarmed. The commander and his officers conferred: “If we do not retreat today, the ruler of Chu may soon be taking our heads.” So the Qi army withdrew.

Thus, no skill is so small that it cannot be of use; what matters is whether a ruler knows how to put it to good use. Laozi said, “Those who are not good can serve as resources for the good.” In other words, even those who are not skilled in the right way may prove useful in the hands of someone who knows how to employ others.

颜回谓仲尼曰,回益矣。仲尼曰,何谓也。曰,回忘礼乐矣。回忘礼乐,绝圣弃知,入於无为也。仲尼曰,可矣,犹未也。异日复见,曰,回益矣。仲尼曰,何谓也。曰,回忘仁义矣。仲尼曰,可矣,犹未也。异日复见,曰,回坐忘矣。言坐自忘其身,以至道也。仲尼(造)[日复见,曰,回益矣。仲尼曰,何谓也。曰,回忘仁义矣。仲尼曰,可矣,犹未也。异日复见,曰,回坐忘矣。言坐自忘其身,以至道也。仲尼(造)[遽]18然曰,何谓坐忘?颜回曰,隳支体,黜聪明,离形去知,洞於化通,是谓坐忘。仲尼曰,洞则无善也,化则无常矣,而夫子荐贤,荐,先也。回入贤。丘请从之后。故老子曰,载营魄抱一,能无离乎,专气至柔,能如婴儿乎。
Interpretation

Yan Hui said to Confucius, “I have made further progress.” Confucius asked, “What do you mean?” Yan Hui replied, “I have forgotten ritual and music.” Confucius said, “That is good, but it is not enough.”

The next day, Yan Hui came to see Confucius again and said, “I have made further progress.” Confucius asked, “What do you mean?” Yan Hui replied, “I have forgotten benevolence and righteousness.” Confucius said, “That is good, but it is not enough.”

Another day passed, and Yan Hui came to see Confucius and said, “I have now attained ‘sitting in forgetfulness.’” Sitting in forgetfulness means forgetting one’s own body while sitting quietly, in order to accord with the Great Dao.

Confucius asked eagerly, “What does sitting in forgetfulness mean?” Yan Hui replied, “I no longer let my limbs be governed by conscious thought. I set aside the cleverness of the senses, leave behind the constraints of bodily form, and relinquish discriminating thought. My mind becomes open to the transformations of all things. This is called sitting in forgetfulness.”

Confucius said, “To be open to transformation is to cling no longer to good or evil; to follow transformation is to have no fixed state. You have already entered the realm of the worthy ahead of me. I would like to follow behind you and learn.”

That is why Laozi said, “Can you carry the body and soul and hold to the One without letting them part? Can you concentrate your Qi and reach gentleness, like an infant?” Here, “carrying the soul and embracing the One” means bringing body and soul into harmony and holding single-mindedly to the Dao. “Concentrating the Qi and reaching gentleness” means focusing on cultivating vital energy until body and mind attain a state of gentleness.

秦穆公兴师,将以袭郑。蹇叔曰,不可。臣闻袭国者,以车不过百里,以人不过三十里。为其谋未及发泄也,甲兵未及锐弊也,粮食未及乏绝也,人民未及罢病也。皆以其气之高与可。臣闻袭国者,以车不过百里,以人不过三十里。为其谋未及发泄也,甲兵未及锐弊也,粮食未及乏绝也,人民未及罢病也。皆以其气之高与其力之盛至,是以犯敌能威。今行数千里,又数绝诸侯之地,以袭国,臣不知其可也。君重图之。穆公不听。蹇叔送师,衰绖而哭之。师遂行,过周而东,郑贾人弦高矫郑伯之命,以十二牛劳秦师而宾之。三帅乃惧而谋曰,吾行数千里以袭人,未至而人已知之,其备必先成,不可袭也。还师而去。当此之时,晋文公适薨,未葬,先轸言於襄公,先轸,晋大夫也。襄公,晋文公子。曰,昔吾先君与穆公交,天下莫不闻,诸候莫不知。今吾君薨未葬,而不吊吾丧,而不假道,是死吾君而弱吾孤也。请击之。襄公许诺。先翰举兵而与秦师遇於散,大破之。擒其三军以归。穆公闻之,素服庙吾孤也。请击之。襄公许诺。先翰举兵而与秦师遇於散,大破之。擒其三军以归。穆公闻之,素服庙临,以说於众。说,解,故老子曰,知而不知,尚矣。不知而知,病也。
Interpretation

Duke Mu of Qin sent out an army, intending to attack the state of Zheng. Jian Shu urged him not to do so. “It will not work,” he said. “I have heard that when making a surprise attack on another state, an army traveling by chariot should not go more than a hundred li, and an army marching on foot should not go more than thirty li. At that distance, the plan will not yet have leaked, weapons will not yet have worn out, provisions will not yet have run low, and the soldiers will not yet be exhausted or ill. People attack when their morale is high and their strength is full; that is how they intimidate the enemy. I have heard that an army making a surprise attack should not travel more than a hundred li by chariot or thirty li on foot. That is why. Now you intend to travel thousands of li and cross the lands of several feudal lords to attack Zheng. I do not know whether this can succeed. Please consider it carefully once more.”

Duke Mu did not heed him. As the army set out, Jian Shu saw it off in mourning clothes and a mourning sash, weeping. The Qin army continued east, passing through the royal domain of the Zhou house. A Zheng merchant named Xian Gao, pretending to act on the order of the Earl of Zheng, the ruler of Zheng, presented the Qin army with twelve oxen and received them with the courtesies due to honored guests. The army’s three commanders grew wary and conferred: “We have traveled thousands of li to attack another state, yet before we have even reached Zheng, they already know we are coming. Their defenses must be fully prepared, so a surprise attack is impossible.” They then withdrew.

At that time, Duke Wen of Jin had just died and had not yet been buried. Xian Zhen, a senior Jin official, said to Duke Wen’s son, Duke Xiang of Jin: “In the past, our late ruler and Duke Mu of Qin were on friendly terms. Everyone in the world knew it, as did the rulers of the various states. Now our ruler has died and still lies unburied, yet Qin has neither sent condolences nor asked Jin for passage through its territory. This is as good as putting our ruler to death and bullying his young heir. Please allow us to attack the Qin army.” Duke Xiang agreed.

Xian Zhen led the troops into battle with the Qin army at Xiao. They routed it, captured the soldiers from all three Qin divisions, and brought them back to Jin. When Duke Mu of Qin heard what had happened, he put on plain mourning clothes, wept in the ancestral temple, and acknowledged his fault before the people.

The Laozi says: “To know, yet appear not to know, is wisdom. Not to know, yet think that one knows, is a flaw.”

齐王后死,王欲置后而未定,使群臣议。薛公欲中王之意,薛公,田婴也。因献十珥而美其一。旦日,因问美珥之所在,因劝立以为王后。齐王大说,遂尊重薛公。故人主之意欲见於外,则为人臣之所制。故老子曰,塞其兑,闭其门,终身不勤。卢敖游乎北海,卢敖,燕人,秦始皇召以为博士,使求神仙,亡而不反也。经乎太阴,入乎玄阙,太阴,北方也。玄阙,北方之山也。至於蒙谷之上。蒙谷,山名。见一士焉,深目而玄鬓,士,使求神仙,亡而不反也。经乎太阴,入乎玄阙,太阴,北方也。玄阙,北方之山也。至於蒙谷之上。蒙谷,山名。见一士焉,深目而玄鬓,泪注泪,水。而鸢肩,丰上而杀下,轩轩然方迎风而舞。顾见卢敖,慢然下其臂,慢然止舞也。遁逃乎碑。匿於碑阴。卢敖就而视之,方倦龟壳楚人谓倨为倦,龟壳,龟甲也。而食蛤梨。蛤梨,海蚌。卢敖与之语曰,唯放为背群离党,穷观於六合之外者,非敖而已乎?敖幼而好游,至长不渝。周行四极,唯北阴之未窥。今卒睹夫子於是,子殆可与敖为友乎?若士者,啮音拳。然而笑曰,嘻,子中州之民,宁肯而远至此。此犹光乎日月言太阴之地渝。周行四极,唯北阴之未窥。今卒睹夫子於是,子殆可与敖为友乎?若士者,啮音拳。然而笑曰,嘻,子中州之民,宁肯而远至此。此犹光乎日月言太阴之地,尚见日月也。而载列星,阴阳之所行,四时之所生,其比夫不名之地,犹窔奥也。言我所游不可字名之地,以卢敖而所行比之,财如窔奥。奥,室中也。若我南游乎冈实之野,北息乎沉墨之乡,西穷冥冥之党,东开鸿蒙之光。此其下无地而上无天,听焉无闻,视焉无昫。此其外犹有汰沃之汜。汰沃,四海(子)[与]19天之际水流声也。汜,涯也。其余一举而千万里,千万里,汰汜之外也。吾犹未能之在。吾尚未至此地。今子游始於此,乃语穷观,岂不亦远哉。然子处矣,吾与汗漫期于九垓万里,汰汜之外也。吾犹未能之在。吾尚未至此地。今子游始於此,乃语穷观,岂不亦远哉。然子处矣,吾与汗漫期于九垓之外,汗漫不可知之也。九垓,九天之外。吾不可以久驻。若士举臂而竦身,遂入云中。卢敖仰而视之,弗见,乃止驾。止其所驾之车。(止)20柸治,楚人谓恨不得为柸治也。悖若有丧也。曰,吾比夫子,犹黄鹄与蠰虫也。蠰虫,虫之幼也。终日行,不离咫尺。八寸为咫,十寸为尺。而自以为远,岂不悲哉。故庄子曰,小人不及大人,小知不及大知,朝菌不知晦朔,朝菌,朝生暮死之虫也。生水上,状似蚕蛾。一名孳母,海南谓之虫邪蟪蛄不知春秋。蟪蛣,貂蟟。此言明之有所不见也。
Interpretation

After the Queen of Qi died, the King of Qi wanted to appoint another queen but could not make up his mind, so he asked his ministers to discuss it. Lord Xue (Tian Ying) wanted to anticipate the king’s wishes, so he presented him with ten pairs of earrings, one of them especially exquisite. The next day, he took the opportunity to ask where the exquisite pair was, then urged the king to appoint its owner as queen. The King of Qi was delighted and valued Lord Xue even more.

Thus, once a ruler’s intentions are revealed, his ministers can gain control over him. This is why Laozi says, “Block the openings of the senses and close the gates of desire, and you will never be troubled throughout your life.”

Lu Ao, a man of Yan whom Qin Shi Huang once summoned to serve as a court scholar and ordered to seek immortals, later fled and never returned. He traveled through the Northern Sea, passed through the Great Yin region in the north, entered the Dark Gate Mountains, and climbed Mount Meng Valley. There he encountered an extraordinary man: his eye sockets were deep-set, his temples black, and tears streamed endlessly down his face. His shoulders hunched like an eagle’s; his upper body was broad and his lower body thin. He danced lightly into the wind. When the man saw Lu Ao, he lowered his arms and hid behind a stone stele.

Lu Ao approached and saw him curled up like a turtle, eating shellfish. He said to him, “Am I, Lu Ao, the only one who can let everything go, withdraw from the crowds, and travel beyond the four quarters of Heaven and Earth? I have loved traveling since childhood, and I did not change as I grew up. I have journeyed throughout the four directions, with only the distant northern wilderness left unexplored. Now, at last, I have met you here. Surely you could be my friend?”

The extraordinary man laughed and replied, “Alas, you are a man of the Central Plains. How could you have come all this way? The places you have visited are still lit by the sun and moon, still crossed by the stars, and still subject to the movement of Yin-Yang and the passage of the seasons. Compared with the nameless place, this is no more than a corner at the back of a room.

“I once traveled south to the wilds of Gangshi, rested in the north in the land of Chenmo, journeyed west to the farthest edge of the dim and obscure, and saw the dawn of Hongmeng in the east. In those places there is no earth below or sky above, no sound to hear and no form to see. Even beyond them, there are vast, boundless waters. Beyond those waters, a single step spans ten million miles. Yet even so, I have not reached the end. You have only just begun your travels, yet you say you have seen the farthest reaches. How far short you still fall!

“Stay here. I have an appointment with Hanman, in the unknowable realm, and must go beyond the Nine Heavens. I cannot remain long.”

The extraordinary man raised his arm and leapt up, then entered the clouds. Lu Ao looked up, but could no longer see him, so he stopped his carriage. He felt frustrated, as if he had lost something, and said, “Compared with you, I am like a wild swan beside a larva. I have traveled all day without leaving a space as small as a foot, yet thought I had gone far. How pitiable!”

Thus Zhuangzi says, “The small cannot keep up with the great, and little wisdom cannot keep up with great wisdom. The morning mushroom knows nothing of the beginning or end of the month; the cicada knows nothing of spring or autumn.” This means that there are always limits to what people can know.

季子治直父三年,季子,子贱。而巫马期絻衣短褐,巫马期,孔子弟子也。易容貌,往观化焉。易服而往,微以视之。见夜鱼释之。巫马期问焉曰,凡子所为鱼者,欲得也。弟子也。易容貌,往观化焉。易服而往,微以视之。见夜鱼释之。巫马期问焉曰,凡子所为鱼者,欲得也。今得而释之,何也。渔者对曰,季子不欲人取小鱼也。古者,鱼不盈尺,不上俎也。所得者小鱼,是以释之。巫马期归以报孔子曰,季子之德至矣,使人暗行,若有严刑在其侧者。季子何以至於此。孔子曰,丘尝问之以治,言曰,诫於此者刑於彼。季子必行此术也。故老子曰,去彼取此。
Interpretation

Jizi, also known as Zijian and a disciple of Confucius, governed Zhifu for three years. Wuma Qi, another of Confucius’s disciples, dressed in coarse cloth, altered his appearance, and secretly went to observe how the people there were being taught.

He saw a fisherman release the small fish he had caught back into the water, and asked him, “You fish in order to catch fish. Why catch them and then let them go?”

The fisherman replied, “Jizi does not want people to catch small fish. In ancient times, fish less than a foot long were not placed on the table for sacrifices or banquets. The fish I caught were all small, so I released them.”

Wuma Qi returned and told Confucius, “Jizi’s De (Virtue/Power) is truly profound. He can make people act at night with the same caution they would show if severe punishment were being enforced beside them. How has Jizi managed this?”

Confucius said, “I once asked him how he governed. He said, ‘If you instruct people here, they will observe the law elsewhere.’ Jizi must have put this method into practice. That is why Laozi said, ‘Leave one side aside and take up the other.’”

The point here is that teaching can lead people to follow rules of their own accord: even without anyone watching, they act in accordance with them. The final phrase, “leave one side aside and take up the other,” means to abandon one course and choose another. Here, it refers to using teaching to cultivate self-discipline.

罔两问於景罔两,水之精物也。景,日月水光晷也。曰,昭昭者,神明也?罔两恍惚之物,见景光明,以为神也。景曰,非也。罔两曰,子何以知之?景曰,扶桑受谢,日照宇宙,扶桑,日所出之木也。受谢,扶桑受日,旦泽出之也。照照之光,辉烛四海。阖户塞牖,则无由入曰,扶桑受谢,日照宇宙,扶桑,日所出之木也。受谢,扶桑受日,旦泽出之也。照照之光,辉烛四海。阖户塞牖,则无由入矣。若神明,四通并流,无所不及,上际於天,下蟠於地,化育万物而不可为象,俛仰之间而抚四海之外。照照何足以明之。故老子曰,天下之至柔,驰骋天下之至坚。
Interpretation

A watery sprite formed from fine vital energy asked a shadow, “Is that bright thing a spirit?” The sprite could make little sense of what it saw. When the shadow appeared, it took it for a spirit. The shadow replied, “No.” The sprite asked, “How do you know?”

The shadow said, “Fusang, the mythical tree where the sun rises, receives the sunlight, and the sun shines over heaven and earth. Fusang takes in the sun’s radiance, and the dawn light rises from there. Its brilliance illuminates the four seas. Shut the doors and block the windows, and sunlight can no longer enter. Fusang receives the sunlight, and the sun shines over heaven and earth. Fusang takes in the sun’s radiance, and the dawn light rises from there. Its brilliance illuminates the four seas. Shut the doors and block the windows, and sunlight can no longer enter. The spirit, by contrast, reaches in every direction and flows without end; there is nowhere it cannot go. It joins heaven above and settles upon the earth below, nurturing and transforming the myriad things, yet it cannot be represented by any concrete form. Between one bow and one lift of the head, it can touch what lies beyond the four seas. How could a mere brightness explain the spirit?”

Thus Laozi said, “The softest thing in the world can move swiftly through what is hardest in the world.”

光耀问於无有光耀可见,而无有至虚者子。曰,果有乎?其果无有乎?有形生於无形,何以能生物,故问果有乎,其无有也。无有弗应也。光耀不得问,而就视其状貌,冥然忽然视之,不见其形,听之,不闻其声,搏之不可得,望之不可极也。光耀曰,贵矣哉,孰能至于此乎。予能有无矣,未能无无也。言我能使形不可得,未能殊无形也。及其为无无,又何从至於此哉。故老子曰,无有入于无间,吾是以知无为之有益此乎。予能有无矣,未能无无也。言我能使形不可得,未能殊无形也。及其为无无,又何从至於此哉。故老子曰,无有入于无间,吾是以知无为之有益也。白公胜虑乱,白公将为父复雠,起兵乱,因思虑之也。罢朝而立,到杖策,錣音针。上贯颐,策,马捶。端有针,以刺马,谓之錣。到杖策,故錣贯颐也。血流至地而弗知也。郑人闻之曰,颐之忘,将何不忘哉。白公之父死,郑预之,故惧之也。此言精神之越於外,智虑之荡於内,则不能漏理其形也。漏,补空也。是故神之所用者远,则所遗者近也。近,谓身也。故老子曰,不出户知天下,不窥牖以见天道。其出弥远,其知弥少,此之谓也。
Interpretation

Radiance asked Nonbeing, “Does the unseen ‘Nonbeing,’ which has no light, truly exist, or does it not exist at all?” Nonbeing did not answer. Radiance approached to examine what it was like. It was dim and indistinct, with no visible form. He listened, but heard no sound. He reached out to touch it, but felt nothing. He gazed into the distance, but could see no end.

Radiance exclaimed, “How wondrous! Who could attain such a state? I can make what has form invisible, but I still cannot make ‘formlessness’ itself disappear. If even ‘formlessness’ could cease to exist, where could one begin to attain such a state?” Thus the Laozi says, “Nonbeing can enter where there is no gap.” From this I understand that Wuwei (non-action, following things as they are without forcing them) truly brings benefit. Perhaps this is what it means.

Bai Gong Sheng was plotting a rebellion in his heart. Seeking revenge for his father, he launched an armed revolt, having brooded over it beforehand. After withdrawing from court, he stood leaning on his riding whip. A sharp pin at the tip of the whip, called a zhui, pierced his chin by accident. Blood ran to the ground, yet he did not notice. When the people of Zheng heard of this, they said, “If he can forget that his chin is wounded, what could he not forget?” Bai Gong’s father had been killed by Zheng Yu of Zheng, so Bai Gong had long been consumed by thoughts of revenge.

The point is that when the spirit scatters outward and the mind is disturbed by inward schemes, one neglects to care for one’s own body. When the spirit is occupied with things far away, things close at hand are easily forgotten; here, “close at hand” means oneself. Thus the Laozi says, “Without going out the door, one can know all under Heaven; without looking out the window, one can understand the Way of Heaven. The farther one travels, the less one knows.” This is precisely the point.

秦皇帝得天下,恐不能守,发边戍,筑长城,修关梁,设障塞,具传车,置边吏。然刘氏夺之,若转闭锤。闭锤,格也出弥远,其知弥少,此之谓也。 秦皇帝得天下,恐不能守,发边戍,筑长城,修关梁,设障塞,具传车,置边吏。然刘氏夺之,若转闭锤。闭锤,格也。上之锤,所以编薄席,反覆之易。昔武王伐纣,破之牧野,乃封比干之墓,表商容之闾,柴箕子之门,纣死,箕子亡之朝鲜,旧居空,故柴护之。朝成汤之庙,发巨桥之粟,散鹿台之钱,破鼓折抱,弛弓绝弦,去舍露宿以示平易,解剑带笏以示无仇。於此天下歌谣而乐之,诸候执弊相朝,三十四世不夺。故老子曰,善闭者无关键,而不可开也。善结者无绳约,而不可解也。 尹需学御,三年而无得焉,私自苦痛,常寝想之。寝坚思之。中夜,梦受秋驾於师。秋驾,善御之术。明日,往朝。师望之,谓之曰,吾非(受)[爱]21道於中夜,梦受秋驾於师。秋驾,善御之术。明日,往朝。师望之,谓之曰,吾非(受)[爱]21道於子也,恐子不可予也,今日教子以秋驾。尹需反走,北面再拜曰,臣有天幸,今夕固梦受之。故老子曰,致虚极,守静笃,万物并作,吾以观其复也。
Interpretation

After Qin Shi Huang unified the realm, he feared that his regime might not endure. He therefore conscripted border troops, built the Great Wall, repaired passes and bridges, established checkpoints and fortresses, prepared relay vehicles, and stationed officials along the borders. Yet the Liu clan still seized the realm. It was like giving a closed bamboo strip a slight nudge and watching it flip open.

“Closed bamboo strip” refers to a lattice-like piece of bamboo, which could also be woven into a thin mat. It is easy to turn over. The image shows that the more meticulously defenses are arranged, the more they may reveal the ruler’s limited understanding.

In the past, after King Wu of Zhou defeated King Zhou of Shang at Muye, he repaired Bi Gan’s tomb, erected a marker in Shang Rong’s neighborhood to honor him, and protected Jizi’s gate with bundles of wood. After King Zhou died, Jizi fled to Korea, leaving his former home empty, so King Wu had it enclosed with wood. King Wu also made offerings at the ancestral temple of Tang of Shang, opened the granaries at Juqiao to feed the people, and distributed the wealth from Lutai. He smashed the war drums and broke their stands, loosened the bowstrings, and discarded the bows and arrows. He slept outdoors, away from his residence, to show that he was approachable; he removed his sword and tablet to show that he bore no resentment. The people of the realm praised and supported him as a result, and the feudal lords came to pay court with gifts. The Zhou dynasty therefore lasted for thirty-four generations without losing the realm.

Thus Laozi says, “One skilled at closing a door can make it impossible to open without using a bolt; one skilled at tying knots can make them impossible to undo without using a rope.”

Yin Xu studied chariot driving, but after three years he still had not mastered it. Deeply troubled, he would often lie down and ponder it over and over, devoting himself to it even at night. One night, he dreamed that his teacher taught him “Autumn Driving,” a superior method of chariot driving. The next day, he went to see his teacher. Looking at him, the teacher said, “It was not that I was unwilling to teach you the art of driving. I was only concerned that you could not yet grasp it. Today, I will teach you Autumn Driving.” Yin Xu turned away, stepped back, and bowed twice facing north. “I am truly fortunate,” he said. “I learned it in a dream last night.”

Thus Laozi says, “Bring the mind to the utmost stillness, and hold steadfast to profound quiet. All things grow and change together; from this I observe how they return to their source.”

昔孙叔敖三得令尹,无喜志;三去令尹,无忧色。延陵季子,吴人愿一以为王而不肯;许由让天下而弗受;晏子与崔杼盟,临死地不变其仪;此皆有所远通也。精神通於死生,则物孰能惑之。荆有饮非,得宝剑於干队。干音寒。干国在今临淮,出宝剑董为莫邪、洞鄂之形也。还反度江,至於中流,阳侯之波,两蛟侠绕其船。蛟龙属也。鱼漏二千五百斤,蛟未为之主也。佽非谓枻船者枻,棹。曰,尝有如此而得活者乎?对曰,未尝见也。於是佽非瞑目勃然,攘臂拔剑曰,武士可以仁义之礼未为之主也。佽非谓枻船者枻,棹。曰,尝有如此而得活者乎?对曰,未尝见也。於是佽非瞑目勃然,攘臂拔剑曰,武士可以仁义之礼说也,不可劫而夺也。此江中之腐肉朽骨,弃剑而已,余有奚爱焉。赴江刺蛟,遂断其头,船中人尽活,风波毕除,荆爵为执圭。孔子闻之曰,夫善载,腐肉朽骨弃剑者,(饮)[佽]22非之谓乎。故老子曰,夫唯无以生为者,是贤於贵生焉。
Interpretation

In the past, Sun Shuao served three times as Lingyin, the highest official in the state of Chu, without showing joy; and three times he left office without looking sorrowful. Jizha of Yanling, a prince of Wu, was chosen by the people of Wu to be their king but refused to accept. Xu You declined the rule of the world and did not take it. When the Qi minister Yan Ying swore an alliance with Cui Zhu, he stood at the brink of life and death yet remained composed. These people all understood the principles that reach far into the future. If the spirit can understand life and death, what could possibly bewilder it?

A man from Chu named Ci Fei obtained a precious sword in the state of Gan, an ancient state near present-day Linhuai. On his return, as he crossed the river, huge waves suddenly rose around the middle of the stream. Two jiaolong coiled around the boat, and everyone aboard was thrown into panic. Ci Fei asked the boatman, “Has anyone ever survived a situation like this?” The boatman replied, “I have never seen it happen.”

Ci Fei then closed his eyes, roused himself with a sudden effort, rolled up his sleeves, and drew his sword. “A warrior may be persuaded through the rites of benevolence and righteousness, but cannot be coerced into surrendering what is his. These jiaolong are no more than rotting flesh and decayed bones in the river. What is there to regret in throwing away a sword?” He leapt into the river, attacked the jiaolong, and cut off their heads. Everyone aboard was saved, and the wind and waves subsided. The king of Chu therefore granted Ci Fei the title of Zhigui, a high rank in Chu.

When Confucius heard of this, he remarked, “The one who was skilled at bearing a load, regarded the jiaolong as rotting flesh and decayed bones, and cast aside his sword to face danger—this must be Ci Fei.” Thus Laozi said, “Only those who do not prize the preservation of life too highly are more worthy than those who cherish life.”

齐人淳于髡以从说魏王,魏王辩之。约车十乘,将使荆,辞而行。人以为从未足也,复以衡说,其辞若然。从说,说诸候之计当相从也。衡说,从之非是,当横更计也。魏王乃止其行。人以为从未足也,复以衡说,其辞若然。从说,说诸候之计当相从也。衡说,从之非是,当横更计也。魏王乃止其行而疏其身。失从心,而有不能成衡之事,是其所以固。夫言有宗,事有本,失其宗本,能虽多,不若其寡也。故周鼎着倕,而使龄其指,先王以见大巧之不可也。故慎子曰,匠人知为门,能以门,慎子,名到,齐人。所以不知门也,不知门之要也。故必杜然后能门。门之要在门外。 墨者有田鸠者,田鸠,学墨子之术也。欲见秦惠王,约车申辕,申,束。留於秦周年不得见。必杜然后能门。门之要在门外。
Interpretation

Chunyu Kun, a man of Qi, tried to persuade the King of Wei with the doctrine of vertical alliances, and the king debated with him. Chunyu Kun prepared ten chariots and was about to set out as an envoy to Chu. After taking his leave of the King of Wei, he was ready to depart. Someone said that he had not yet fully explained the case for vertical alliances, so he again tried to persuade the king, this time with the doctrine of horizontal alliances, though his words were the same as before. “Vertical alliances” meant that the feudal lords should join together; “horizontal alliances” held that vertical alliances were mistaken and should be replaced by a different strategy. The King of Wei therefore ordered him to cancel his journey. Others again said that he had not fully explained the case for vertical alliances, so he spoke once more about horizontal alliances, repeating the same arguments. In the end, the king not only refused to let him go but also distanced himself from him.

He had neither strengthened the King of Wei’s resolve to pursue vertical alliances nor brought about horizontal alliances. That was why he failed. Speech needs a central purpose, and action needs a firm foundation. Without either, knowing a great deal is less useful than knowing little but remaining focused.

Thus, the image of the craftsman Chui was carved on a bronze tripod from the Zhou dynasty, but the carver injured his finger. The former kings used this to show that making an excessive display of skill is unwise. Shen Dao, a Warring States thinker, said that a craftsman may know how to build a door without understanding what a door is for. Shen Dao, whose personal name was Dao, was from Qi. Without understanding what matters about a door, one cannot truly build one well. One must therefore first close the door to understand how to build it; what matters about the door is, paradoxically, outside it.

Tian Jiu, a disciple of the Mohists—those who studied Mozi’s teachings—wanted to pay a visit to King Hui of Qin. He prepared his horses and chariot, tightened the chariot’s crossbar, and remained in Qin for a full year, yet never managed to see the king. One must first close the door to understand how to build it; what matters about the door is, paradoxically, outside it.

墨者有田鸠者,田鸠,学墨子之术也。欲见秦惠王,约车申辕,申,束。留於秦周年不得见。客有言之楚王者,往见楚王。楚王甚悦之,予以节,使於秦,至,因见予之将军之节,惠王而说之。出舍,喟然而叹,告从者曰,吾留秦三年不得见,不识道之可以从楚也。物故有近之而远,远之而近者。故大人之行,不掩以绳,掩,犹惮也。至所极而已矣。此所谓筦子枭飞而维绳者。言为士者上下无常,进退无恒,不可绳也。以喻飞枭从下绳维之,而欲翱翔,则不可也。丰水之深千仞,而不受尘垢,投金铁针绳也。以喻飞枭从下绳维之,而欲翱翔,则不可也。丰水之深千仞,而不受尘垢,投金铁针焉,则形见於外。非不深且清也,鱼鳖龙蛇莫肯之归也。是故石上不生五谷,秃山不游麋鹿,无所阴蔽隐也。 昔赵文子问於叔向曰,晋六将军,其孰先亡乎?六将军,韩、魏、赵、范、中行、知伯也。对曰,中行、知氏。文子曰,何乎?对曰,其为政也,以苛为察,以切为明,以刻下为忠,以计多为功。譬之犹廓革者也,廓之,大则大矣,裂之道也。故老子曰,其政闷闷,其民纯纯,其政察察,其民缺缺。
Interpretation

There was a man named Tian Jiu among the Mohists who studied Mozi’s teachings. He wanted to pay a visit to King Hui of Qin, so he prepared his carriage and horses and tightened the carriage shafts. He stayed in Qin for a whole year, yet never managed to see the king. Later, someone recommended him to the king of Chu, and he went to Chu to pay him a visit. The king of Chu took a great liking to him, gave him a tally of authority, and sent him as an envoy to Qin. When Tian Jiu arrived, the tally granted by the king of Chu enabled him to meet King Hui of Qin at once. The king also received him warmly.

After leaving the palace and returning to his lodging, Tian Jiu sighed and said to his attendants, “I stayed in Qin for three years without being able to see its king. I never imagined that, with a tally from Chu, I would meet him by way of Chu.” Sometimes things seem close but are actually far away; what seems far away may, in fact, bring us closer. Thus, people of great insight are not constrained by fixed rules in their conduct. They need only achieve their aim.

This is like Guan Zhong’s saying, “An owl takes flight, yet a cord is tied to it.” The movements and fortunes of people of ability follow no fixed pattern and cannot be constrained by rigid standards. If you hold a flying bird by a cord from below and still expect it to soar freely, that is impossible.

The Feng River is a thousand fathoms deep, yet it cannot contain dust and dirt. Cast gold, iron, needles, or cords into the water, and their outlines will appear on its surface. The river is neither shallow nor unclear, yet fish, turtles, dragons, and snakes are all unwilling to dwell there. For the same reason, crops do not grow on bare rock, and no elk roam a barren mountain: there is nowhere to find shelter or concealment.

Long ago, Zhao Wenzi asked Shuxiang, “Among the six high-ranking ministers of Jin, which will be the first to fall?” The six were Han, Wei, Zhao, the Fan clan, the Zhonghang clan, and the Zhi clan. Shuxiang replied, “The Zhonghang and Zhi clans.” Zhao Wenzi asked why. Shuxiang said, “When they govern, they mistake harshness for discernment, coercion for acuity, treating subordinates cruelly for loyalty, and elaborate scheming for achievement. It is like stretching leather to make an object: the more you stretch it, the more likely it is to tear.”

That is why Laozi said, “When government orders are lenient and indistinct, the people are simple and honest; when they are exacting and tightly enforced, the people lose their honesty.”

景公谓太卜曰,子之道何能?对曰,能动地。动,震。晏子往见公,公曰,寡人问太卜曰,子之道何能,对曰,能动地。地可动乎?晏子默然不对。出见太卜曰,昔吾见句星在房心之间,地其动乎。句星,客星也。驷,房。之道何能,对曰,能动地。地可动乎?晏子默然不对。出见太卜曰,昔吾见句星在房心之间,地其动乎。句星,客星也。驷,房。句星守房、心,则地动也。太卜曰,然。晏子出,太卜走往见公曰,臣非能动地,地固将动也。田子阳闻之田子阳,齐臣也。曰,晏子默然不对者,不欲太卜之死。往见太卜者,恐公之欺也。晏子可谓忠於上而惠於下矣。故老子曰,方而不割,廉而不刿。
Interpretation

Duke Jing of Qi asked the Grand Diviner, an official responsible for divination, “What can your skill do?” The Grand Diviner replied, “I can make the earth tremble.” The duke asked, “Can you really make the earth tremble?” Yanzi remained silent and did not answer.

After leaving, Yanzi met the Grand Diviner and said to him, “Some time ago, I saw Gou Xing, a ‘guest star’ as the ancients called it, appear between the Fang and Xin lunar mansions. Does that mean the earth is about to tremble?” The Fang and Xin are names of ancient constellations. The Grand Diviner said, “Yes.”

After Yanzi left, the Grand Diviner hurried to see Duke Jing and said, “I cannot make the earth tremble; it was going to tremble of its own accord.” Tian Ziyang, a minister of Qi, heard about this and said, “Yanzi stayed silent at the time because he did not want the Grand Diviner to lose his life over it. Later, he went to see the Grand Diviner because he feared the duke would deceive him. Yanzi was loyal to his ruler and kind to those beneath him.”

Thus Laozi said, “Be upright without injuring others; be incorruptible without wounding them.” This means that even when we conduct ourselves with integrity and purity, we should avoid causing others harm as a result.

魏文侯觞诸大夫於曲阳。饮酒酣,文侯喟然叹曰,吾独无豫让以为臣子。豫让事知伯而死其难,故文侯思以为臣。蹇重举白而进之,蹇重,文侯臣也。举白,进酒。曰,请浮君。浮犹罚也,以酒罚君也。君曰,何也?对曰,臣闻之,有命之父母不知孝子,有道之君不知忠臣。夫豫让之文侯臣也。举白,进酒。曰,请浮君。浮犹罚也,以酒罚君也。君曰,何也?对曰,臣闻之,有命之父母不知孝子,有道之君不知忠臣。夫豫让之君,亦何如哉。豫让相其君,而君见杀,亦何如。不足贵也。文侯受觞而饮釂不献,釂,尽。曰,无管仲、鲍叔以为臣,故有豫让之功。故老子曰,国家昏乱,有忠臣。
Interpretation

Duke Wen of Wei held a banquet for his ministers at Quyang. As the wine flowed and the gathering reached its high point, he sighed, “It is a pity that I do not have a minister like Yu Rang.” Yu Rang had once served the Zhi clan and later died for them, so Duke Wen wished to make him his own minister.

His minister Jian Zhong raised his cup in a toast to Duke Wen and said, “I ask you to drink a cup as punishment.” Here, “floating” meant imposing a penalty of wine. Duke Wen asked, “Why should I be punished?” Jian Zhong replied, “I have heard that even when Heaven gives parents a son, they may not know whether he will be filial. A ruler may truly follow the Dao and yet not know whether he has loyal ministers. What sort of ruler did Yu Rang serve? Yu Rang aided him, yet his lord was killed. What is there to praise in that?”

Duke Wen took the cup and drained it, without passing it on to offer another toast. He said, “It was precisely the absence of men like Guan Zhong and Bao Shu to assist him that made Yu Rang’s achievement possible.” That is why Laozi said, “When a state is in disorder, loyal ministers appear.”

孔子观桓公之庙,桓公,鲁君也。有器焉,谓之宥卮。宥,在坐右。孔子曰,善哉,(乎)[予]23得见此器。顾曰,弟子水。水至,灌之,其中君也。有器焉,谓之宥卮。宥,在坐右。孔子曰,善哉,(乎)[予]23得见此器。顾曰,弟子水。水至,灌之,其中则正,中,水半卮中也。其盈则覆。孔子造然革容曰,善哉,持盈者乎。子贡在侧,曰,请问持盈。曰,揖而损之。曰,何谓揖而损之。曰,夫物盛而衰,乐极则悲,日中而移,月盈而亏,是故聪明睿知,守之以愚;多闻博辩,守之以俭;武力毅勇,守之以畏;富贵广大,守之以陋;德施天下,守之以让。此五者,先王所以守天下而弗失也。反此五者,未尝不危也。故老子曰,保此道者不欲盈。夫唯不盈,故能弊而不新成。
Interpretation

Confucius came to the temple of Duke Huan of Lu and saw a vessel called the youzhi, a wine vessel placed to the right of one’s seat. Confucius said, “How good! I can finally see this vessel.” He turned and told his disciples to fetch water. When it arrived, he poured it into the vessel. When the vessel stood upright, the water filled only half of it; when full, it tipped over.

With a solemn expression, Confucius said, “How good! This shows the principle of keeping fullness in check.” Zigong, standing nearby, asked, “May I ask how one can keep fullness in check?” Confucius replied, “By exercising restraint and willingly reducing what one has.” Zigong asked again, “What does it mean to willingly reduce what one has?” Confucius said, “When things reach their height, they decline. When joy reaches its limit, it turns to sorrow. After noon, the sun begins to move west; after the moon is full, it gradually wanes. Therefore, those who are intelligent and perceptive should restrain themselves by appearing foolish. Those who are widely learned and skilled in debate should restrain themselves through frugality. Those who are strong, resolute, and brave should hold themselves in check through reverence. Those who are wealthy, eminent, and powerful should remain humble. Those who extend their beneficence to all under Heaven should conduct themselves with modesty and deference. These five practices are why the sage kings of antiquity possessed all under Heaven without losing it. Whoever goes against them is sure to fall into danger. That is why Laozi says that those who hold to the Dao do not seek fullness. Precisely because they do not seek fullness, even when worn down they avoid becoming rigid and can remain ever-renewed.”

武王问太公曰,寡人伐纣天下,是臣杀其主而下伐其上也。吾恐后世之用兵不休,斗争不已,为之奈何?太公曰,甚善,王之问也。夫未得兽者,唯恐其创之小也,猎禽恐之能杀,伐纣天下,是臣杀其主而下伐其上也。吾恐后世之用兵不休,斗争不已,为之奈何?太公曰,甚善,王之问也。夫未得兽者,唯恐其创之小也,猎禽恐之能杀,故恐其创小也。已得之惟恐伤肉之多也。王若欲久持之,则塞民於兑,兑,耳目鼻口也。老子(也)[曰]24,塞其兑也。道全为无用之事,烦扰之教。彼皆乐其业,供其情,昭昭而道冥冥,於是乃去其瞀而载之木,瞀,被发也。水骛,鸟冠也。知文者冠骛。解其剑而带之笏。为三年之丧,令类不蕃。高辞卑让,使民不争。酒肉以通之,竽瑟以娱之,鬼神以畏之。繁文滋礼以弇其质,厚葬久丧以亶音丹。其家,含珠肉以通之,竽瑟以娱之,鬼神以畏之。繁文滋礼以弇其质,厚葬久丧以亶音丹。其家,含珠鳞、施纶组以贫其财,深凿高垄以尽其力。家贫族少,虑患者贫。以此移风,可以持天下弗失。故老子曰,化而欲作,吾将镇之以无名之朴也。
Interpretation

King Wu of Zhou asked the Grand Duke: “If I send out troops to punish King Zhou, people throughout the realm will say that a minister is killing his ruler and a subordinate is attacking his superior. I fear that wars will continue and conflict will never cease in later generations. What should I do?”

The Grand Duke replied: “Your Majesty asks a good question. Before a hunter catches his prey, he worries that its wound is too slight and it will escape. Once he has caught it, he worries that its injuries are too severe and too much meat has been lost. If Your Majesty wishes to govern the realm for a long time, you must restrain the people’s sensory desires. When Laozi speaks of ‘blocking the openings,’ he means curbing the senses of hearing, sight, smell, and taste. In governing the realm, one should eliminate useless affairs and burdensome teachings.

The people should be made content with their occupations and satisfied with their lives. In public, one should uphold clear rites and laws; inwardly, one should follow the deep, unfathomable Dao through Wuwei (non-action)—letting things follow their natural course without undue interference. Thus, eliminate disorderly hairstyles and elaborate clothing: people should no longer wear their hair loose, adorn themselves with bird-shaped headdresses, or carry swords, but instead carry tablets that symbolize ritual propriety. Institute three years of mourning to reduce population growth; promote humility and yielding so that the people do not contend. Use wine and meat to build goodwill, instruments such as the yu and se zithers to bring pleasure, and belief in spirits and deities to inspire reverence. Then conceal the unadorned nature of the people beneath elaborate ritual forms, and exhaust family wealth through lavish burials and prolonged mourning. Adorn the dead and mourning garments with pearls, jade, and colored ribbons, depleting their possessions; dig deep tombs and raise high burial mounds, exhausting the people’s labor. In this way, families will become poor and their numbers will dwindle, leaving people unable to plot trouble. By changing customs in this way, one can preserve the realm without losing it.

That is why Laozi said: ‘When the people have been taught and desires arise in them again, I use nameless simplicity to settle them.’”

淮南鸿烈解卷之十八竟 1『无穷』原脱,据集解本补。 2『九』,『凡』字之误,据集解本改。 3『六』,『女』字之误,据集解本改。 4『忘』,『志』字之误,据集解本改。 5『襄』,『衰』字之误,据集解本改。 6『物,罢则怨,怨则极』,原文脱,据集解本补。 7脱『以』字,据集解本补。 8『詹子曰,不能自胜』,原文脱,据集解本补。 9『之』,『人』之误,据集解本改。 10『请』,『谓』字之误,据集解本改。 11『林』,『材』能自胜』,原文脱,据集解本补。 9『之』,『人』之误,据集解本改。 10『请』,『谓』字之误,据集解本改。 11『林』,『材』字之误,据集解本改。 12『君』,『群』字之误,据集解本改。 13『可移於民。公曰,民死,寡人谁为君乎?宁独死耳。韦曰』,原文脱,据集解本补。 14『荣』,『劳』字之误,据集解本改。 15『非』字脱,据集解本补。 16『具』,『其』字之误,据集解本改。 17『至』,『在』字之误,据集解本改。 18『造』,『遽』字之误,据集解本改。 19『子』,『与』字之误,据集解本改。 20『止』字衍,据集解本删。 21『受』,『爱』字之误,据集解本改。 22『饮』,『佽』字之误,据集解本改。 23字衍,据集解本删。 21『受』,『爱』字之误,据集解本改。 22『饮』,『佽』字之误,据集解本改。 23『乎』,『予』字之误,据集解本改。 24『也』,『曰』字之误,据集解本改。
Interpretation

The eighteenth and final chapter of Huainan Honglie Jie.

The following collation notes explain differences between the original text and the Jijie edition. Some characters were missing from the original and have been supplied from the Jijie edition; others were errors and have been corrected according to that edition; still others were redundant and have been removed. For example, “inexhaustible” was missing from the original and has now been supplied from the Jijie edition. The mistaken character “nine” has been changed to “all”; “six” to “woman”; “forget” to “will”; and “Xiang” to “decline.” The omitted passages “When things are exhausted, resentment arises; when resentment arises, it reaches its extreme” and “Master Zhan said, ‘One cannot overcome oneself’” have also been restored. In addition, characters such as “ruler/group,” “glory/toil,” and “arrive/be” have been corrected.

20-淮南鸿烈解卷之十九 淮南鸿烈解卷之十九 太尉祭酒臣许慎记上 泛论训上 博说世间古今得失,以道为化,大归於一,曰泛论,因以题篇。 古者有鍪而绻领以王天下者矣,古者,盖三皇以前也。鍪,头着兜鍪帽,言未知制冠也。绻领,皮衣屈而紩之,如今胡家韦袭反棹以为领也。一说,鍪,放发也;绻,绕颈而已;皆无饰。德生而不辱,刑楷不用也。予而不夺,予、予(无)〔民〕1财也。不夺,无所征求於民也。天下不非其服,同怀其德。非,犹讥呵也。怀,归、予(无)〔民〕1财也。不夺,无所征求於民也。天下不非其服,同怀其德。非,犹讥呵也。怀,归也。当此之时,阴阳和平,风雨时节,万物蕃息,政不虐,生无夭折。乌鹊之巢可俯而探也,禽兽可羁而从也,从,犹牵也。岂必褒衣博带,句襟委章甫哉。褒衣,谓方与之衣,如今吏人之左衣也。博带,大带,诗云,垂带若厉。句襟,今之曲领袖衣也。委,委貌冠。章甫,亦冠之名也。古者民泽处复穴,处,居也。复穴,重窟。一说,穴毁堤防崖岸之中,以为窟室也。冬日则不胜霜雪,夏日则不胜暑热昏,虻。虻渎诗云言来。复穴,重窟。一说,穴毁堤防崖岸之中,以为窟室也。冬日则不胜霜雪,夏日则不胜暑热昏,虻。虻渎诗云言来其□帝臣也。圣人乃作,作,起也。为之筑土构木,以为宫室,构,架也。谓材木相乘架也。上栋下宇,以蔽风雨,栋,屋稳也。字,屋之垂。以避寒署,而百姓安之。安,乐也。伯余之初作衣也,伯余,黄帝臣也。世本曰,伯余制衣裳。一曰,伯余,黄帝。緂麻索缕,手经指挂,其成犹网罗。谈,锐。索,功也。谈,读恬然不动之恬。后世为之机杼胜复以便其用,而民得以揜形御寒。揜,蔽。御,止。古者剡耜而耕,摩蜃而耨,剡,利也。耜,臿属也。蜃,大蛤,摩令利,用之。耨,耨除苗秽也。木钩而樵,抱甄而汲,钩,鎌也。钩,读济阴句阳之句。樵,薪蒸。甄,武。今兖州大蛤,摩令利,用之。耨,耨除苗秽也。木钩而樵,抱甄而汲,钩,鎌也。钩,读济阴句阳之句。樵,薪蒸。甄,武。今兖州曰小武为甄。幽州曰瓦也。民劳而利薄。后世为之耒耜耰锄,斧柯而樵,桔皋而汲,耰,读曰优。椓块椎也。三辅谓之儓,所以覆种也。民逸而利多焉。古者大川名谷,冲绝道路,不通往来也,乃为窬木方版,以为舟航,窬,空也。方,并也。舟相连为航也。故地势有无,得相委输。运所有,输所无。乃为靼蹻而超千里,肩负儋之勤也,靼蹻,靼靸也。勤,劳也。而作为之楺轮建舆无,得相委输。运所有,输所无。乃为靼蹻而超千里,肩负儋之勤也,靼蹻,靼靸也。勤,劳也。而作为之楺轮建舆,驾马服牛,民以致远而不劳。代负儋,故不劳也。为騺禽猛兽之害伤人而无以禁御也,而作为之铸金锻铁,以为兵刃,猛兽不能为害。以兵刃备之,故不得为人害也。故民迫其难则求其便,困其患则造其备,人各以其所知,去其所害,就其所利,常故不可循,器械不可因也。循,随也。当时之可改则改之,故曰不可也。则先王之法度有移易者矣。古之制,婚礼不称主人,当婚者之身,不称其名也,称诸父兄师友。舜不告而娶,非礼也。尧知舜贤,以二女妻,舜不告父,父顽,常欲杀舜,舜知告则不得娶也。不孝莫大於无后,故孟子曰,舜不告,犹告可。立子以长,文王舍伯邑考而用武王,非制也。礼之三十而娶,三十而娶者,阴阳未分时,俱生於子,男从子不告,犹告可。立子以长,文王舍伯邑考而用武王,非制也。礼之三十而娶,三十而娶者,阴阳未分时,俱生於子,男从子数,左行三十年立於巳,女从子数,右行二十年亦立於巳,合夫妇。故圣人因是制礼,使男三十而娶,女二十而嫁。(共)〔其〕2男子自巳数,左行十得寅,故人十月而生於寅,故男子数从寅起。女自巳数,右行得申,亦十月而生於申,故女子数从申起也。伯邑考,武王兄,废长立圣以庶代嫡,圣人之权耳。文王十五而生武王,非法也。岁星十二岁而周天,天道十二而备,故国君十二岁而冠,冠而娶。十五生子,重国嗣也,不从故制也。上句言之,宜伯邑考娶也。十五而生武王,非法也。岁星十二岁而周天,天道十二而备,故国君十二岁而冠,冠而娶。十五生子,重国嗣也,不从故制也。上句言之,宜伯邑考娶也。夏后氏殡於阼阶之上,礼,饭于牖下,小敛於户内,大敛於阼阶,在床曰尸,在棺曰柩。殡於宾位,祖於庭,葬於墓也,於阼阶,犹在主位,未忍以宾道远之。殷人殡於两楹之间,楹,柱也。记曰,殷殡之於堂上两柱之间,宾主共。周人殡於西阶之上,盖以宾道遣之。此礼之不同者也。有虞氏用瓦棺,有虞氏舜世也。瓦棺,陶瓦也。夏后氏圣周,夏后氏,禹世,无棺椁,以瓦广二尺,长四尺,侧身累之,以蔽土,曰圣周也。殷人用椁有虞氏用瓦棺,有虞氏舜世也。瓦棺,陶瓦也。夏后氏圣周,夏后氏,禹世,无棺椁,以瓦广二尺,长四尺,侧身累之,以蔽土,曰圣周也。殷人用椁,用栢为椁,厚之宜,以棺为制也。周人墙置翣,此葬之不同者也。周人兼用棺椁,故墙设翣,状如今要扇,画文,插置棺车箱以为饰。多少之差,各从其爵命之数也。夏后氏祭於暗,於室中,中夜祭之也。殷人祭於阳,於堂上,日平且祭也。周人祭於日出以朝,於日出时祭於庭中。朝者,庭也。此祭之不同者也。尧大章,尧乐也。舜九韶,舜乐也。书曰,箫韶九成是也。禹大夏,禹乐也。汤大濩,汤乐也。周武象,武王乐也。此乐之不同者也。故五帝异道而德覆天下,三王殊事而名施后世,此皆因时变而制礼乐者。譬犹师旷之施瑟柱也,汤大濩,汤乐也。周武象,武王乐也。此乐之不同者也。故五帝异道而德覆天下,三王殊事而名施后世,此皆因时变而制礼乐者。譬犹师旷之施瑟柱也,所推移上下者无寸尺之度,而靡不中音。故通於礼乐之情者能作音,有本主於中,而以知矩彟之所周者也。矩,方也,彟,度法也。
Interpretation

In ancient times, people ruled the world wearing caps and clothes made of animal skins. “Ancient times” here probably refers to the period before the Three Sovereigns, when people had not yet established rules governing ceremonial dress. Rulers governed with De: they did not humiliate the people or rely on punishments to maintain order. They gave the people goods without taking them back in taxes. The people did not mock their plain clothing; instead, they all turned toward the ruler’s De. In those days, Yin-Yang was in harmony, wind and rain came in season, and all things flourished. Government was not cruel, and few people died young. One could reach down and take eggs from magpies’ nests, and lead wild animals along.

Did people in those days really need to wear wide robes, broad sashes, and garments with curved collars, and put on caps such as the Weimao and Zhangfu? People lived by the water or in earthen caves. In winter, they could not withstand frost and snow; in summer, they could not endure the heat and biting insects. So the sages built houses: they rammed earth and set up wooden posts, then raised beams and eaves to shelter people from wind and rain and protect them from cold and heat, allowing them to live in peace.

When Boyu, said to have been a minister of the Yellow Emperor, first made clothing, he twisted hemp into thread, drawing and winding it by hand. The fabric he wove was still like a net. Later, people invented the loom and wove more practical cloth, so they could cover their bodies and ward off the cold. In ancient times, people farmed with pointed spades and cleared weeds with sharpened shells. They chopped wood with wooden sickles and drew water with pottery vessels. Their labor was hard and their harvests small. Later, they developed plows, hoes, axes, and counterweighted well sweeps, making work easier and increasing the harvest.

In the past, deep rivers and valleys blocked roads and made travel difficult. People therefore made hollowed-out rafts and joined boats so that goods could be exchanged between regions. At first, people carried loads on their shoulders and backs and could not travel far. Later, they invented wheels and vehicles, and used horses and oxen to draw them, making long journeys less exhausting. Birds of prey and wild animals could harm people, so they smelted metal and forged weapons for protection. This shows that when people encounter difficulties, they seek what makes things easier; when dangers arise, they find ways to guard against them. Each person uses what they know to avoid harm and pursue benefit. Thus, old practices cannot be followed forever, and tools cannot remain unchanged. When the needs of the times shift, practices should shift too; for this reason, the laws of the former kings also changed.

In ancient marriage rites, the people concerned were not addressed directly; their fathers and elder brothers, teachers, or friends acted on their behalf. Shun married without informing his father, which by the rites was improper. But Yao knew Shun was worthy and gave him his two daughters in marriage. Shun’s father was cruel and often tried to kill him, and Shun knew that informing him would not make the marriage possible. Mencius therefore said that although Shun did not inform his father, in the circumstances it could still be regarded as if he had.

According to the rules of succession, the eldest son should inherit. Yet King Wen of Zhou set aside his eldest son, Boyikao, and appointed King Wu as his successor, contrary to the usual practice. Boyikao was King Wu’s elder brother. Setting aside the eldest in favor of the worthy, and allowing a younger son born to a secondary wife to take the place of the principal wife’s son, was a measure the sage adopted in response to the circumstances. The classic also says that, according to ordinary rites, men married at thirty and women at twenty. A ruler, however, held a coming-of-age ceremony at twelve, in keeping with the twelve-year cycle of Jupiter, and married after reaching adulthood. King Wen fathered King Wu at fifteen, which did not conform to ordinary rites, but was done to secure the succession.

Funeral customs also differed from one dynasty to another. The Xia placed the coffin on the eastern steps, keeping it in the place of the host, because they could not bear to treat the dead as guests. The Shang placed it in the hall between the two pillars. The Zhou placed it on the western steps and sent off the dead according to the rites for a guest. In Shun’s time, coffins were made of pottery. The Xia surrounded the body with tiles; the Shang made an outer coffin of cypress; and the Zhou used both an inner and an outer coffin, placing beside the funeral carriage fans decorated with patterns, whose number depended on the deceased’s rank.

The timing and location of sacrifices also differed. The Xia sacrificed at night in the innermost room; the Shang sacrificed in the hall at dawn; the Zhou sacrificed in the courtyard at sunrise. Their music differed as well: Yao had the “Great Pattern,” Shun the “Nine Shao,” Yu the “Great Xia,” Tang the “Great Huo,” and King Wu of Zhou the “Martial Image.” Thus, the Five Emperors governed in different ways, yet each spread De throughout the world; the Three Kings followed different practices, yet each became renowned for generations. All of these rites and forms of music were established in response to changing times.

This is like the musician Shi Kuang adjusting the movable bridges on a se: he shifted them up or down without following a fixed measure, yet brought the notes into harmony with the musical scales. Only those who understand the purpose of rites and music can create music. Whoever grasps the underlying principles can know where the rules apply.

鲁昭公有慈母而爱之,死为之练冠,故有慈母之服。慈母者,父所命养己者。比大夫之妾,士之妻,谓之女母,礼为总麻三月。昭公独练,言其记礼之所由兴也。阳侯杀梦侯而窃其夫人,故大飨废夫人之礼。阳(伐)(侯)3,阳陵国侯也。蓼侯,皋陶之后,偃姓之国侯 也,今在庐江。古者大飨饮酒,君执爵,夫人执豆。阳侯见蓼侯夫人美艳,因杀蓼侯而娶夫人,由是侯
Interpretation

Duke Zhao of Lu had a foster mother—a woman his father had appointed to raise him—and he loved and respected her deeply. When she died, Duke Zhao wore a lian mourning cap, made from cloth that had been boiled and bleached. This gave rise to the rite of mourning for a foster mother. Her status was roughly equivalent to that of a high official’s concubine or a shi official’s wife, and she was called a “woman mother.” By ritual convention, mourning for her was observed with coarse hemp garments for three months. The author cites Duke Zhao’s wearing of the lian cap for his foster mother as an explanation of how the relevant rite originated.

Marquis Yang, ruler of Yangling, killed the Marquis of Liao and took his wife. As a result, the rite of the wife’s participation in the daxiang, the ruler’s grand banquet, was later discontinued. The Marquis of Liao was a descendant of Gaoyao and belonged to the Yan-surname feudal state, whose territory lay around present-day Lujiang. In ancient times, at a daxiang, the ruler held a wine cup while his wife held a dou, a vessel for serving food. Marquis Yang was struck by the beauty of the Marquis of Liao’s wife, so he killed the marquis and married her. After this, the lords discontinued the rite in which their wives held the dou at the daxiang.

也,今在庐江。古者大飨饮酒,君执爵,夫人执豆。阳侯见蓼侯夫人美艳,因杀蓼侯而娶夫人,由是废致夫人之礼。记所由废也。先王之制,不宜则废之;末世之事,善则着之;是故礼乐未始有常也。故圣人制礼乐,而不制於礼乐。圣人能作礼乐,不为礼乐所制。治国有常,而利民为本。本,要。政教有经,而令行为上。经,常也。上,最也。苟利於民,不必法古。苟周於事,不必循旧。旧,常也。传曰,旧不必良。旧或作咎也。夫夏商之衰也,不变法而亡。亡,谓桀纣。三代之起也,不相袭而王。三代,禹、汤、武也。袭良。旧或作咎也。夫夏商之衰也,不变法而亡。亡,谓桀纣。三代之起也,不相袭而王。三代,禹、汤、武也。袭、因也。故圣人法与时变,礼与俗化,化,易。衣服器械,各便其用。法度制令,各因其宜。故变古未可非,而循俗未足多也。循,随也。俗,常也。百川异源而皆归於海,以海为宗。百家殊业而皆务於治。业,事也。以治为要也。王道缺而诗作,诗所以刺王道。周室废礼义坏而春秋作。春秋,所以绝不由礼义也。诗、春秋,学之美者也,皆衰世之造也。儒者循之以教导於世,岂若三代之盛哉。以诗、春秋为古之道而贵之,又有未作诗、春秋之时。失道,皆衰世之造也。儒者循之以教导於世,岂若三代之盛哉。以诗、春秋为古之道而贵之,又有未作诗、春秋之时。失道之缺也,不若道其全也。诵先王之诗、书,不若闻得其言,闻得其言不若得其所以言。闻圣人之言,不如得其未言时本意。得其所以言者,言弗能言也。圣人所言(不》(微)4妙,凡人虽得之,口不能以言。故道可道者,非常道也。常道,深隐幽冥不可道也,犹圣人之言,微妙不可言。周公事文王也,行无专制,专独制断。事无由己,请以后行。身若不胜衣,言若不出口,有奉持於文王,洞洞属属,如将不能,恐失之。洞洞属属,婉顺貌也。而将不能胜之,恐失之,慎至也。洞,读挺桐之桐。属读犁□之□也。可谓能子矣。武王崩,成王幼少,不能,恐失之。洞洞属属,婉顺貌也。而将不能胜之,恐失之,慎至也。洞,读挺桐之桐。属读犁□之□也。可谓能子矣。武王崩,成王幼少,周公继文王之业,履天子之籍,听天下之政,籍,图籍也。政,治也。籍或作阼也。平夷狄之乱,夷,狄滑夏,平除之也。诛管、蔡之罪。蔡叔,周公兄也。管叔,周公弟也。二叔监殷,而导纣子禄父为流言,欲以乱周。周公诛之,为国故也。传曰,大义灭亲也。负扆而朝诸侯,负,背也。扆,户,牖之间也。言南面也。诛赏制断,无所顾问,决之於心。威动传曰,大义灭亲也。负扆而朝诸侯,负,背也。扆,户,牖之间也。言南面也。诛赏制断,无所顾问,决之於心。威动天地,声慑海内,慑,服也。服四海之内。可谓能武矣。成王既壮,周公属籍致政,北面委质而臣事之,以图籍付属成王。致,犹归。北面委玉帛之质,执臣之礼也。请而后为,复而后行,每事必请。复,白。无擅恣之志,无伐矜之色,不自伐其功劳也。不自矜大其善也。可谓能臣矣。故一人之身而三变者,所以应时矣。何况乎君数易世,国数易君,人以其位达其好憎,人人以其宠位,行其所好,憎其所憎也。以其威势供嗜欲,而欲以一行之礼,一定之法,应时君数易世,国数易君,人以其位达其好憎,人人以其宠位,行其所好,憎其所憎也。以其威势供嗜欲,而欲以一行之礼,一定之法,应时偶变,其不能中权,亦明矣。一行之礼,非随时礼也;一定之法,非随时法也。故曰不能中权。权则因事制宜,不失中道也。故圣人所由曰道,所为曰事。道犹金石,一调不更;事犹琴瑟,每弦改调。金石,钟声也,故曰调而不更。琴瑟,弦有数急,(往)(柱)5有前却,故调事亦如之也。故法制礼义者治人之具也,而非所以为治也。言法制礼义,可以为治之基耳,非所以为治。治在其人之德。犹弓矢,射之具也,非能必中也,中在其人之功也。故治也。言法制礼义,可以为治之基耳,非所以为治。治在其人之德。犹弓矢,射之具也,非能必中也,中在其人之功也。故仁以为经,义以为纪,此万世不更者也。若乃人考其身才,而时省其用,虽日变可也。言人能考度其才,时省其行,择其善者而崇用之,不必循常,故曰,虽曰变可也。唯仁义不可改耳,故万世不更矣。天下岂有常法哉。随其时於其宜。当於世事,得於人理,顺於天地,祥於鬼神,则可以正治矣。当,合也。祥,顺也。
Interpretation

In ancient times, at grand banquets, the ruler held a wine cup while his consort held a dou, a ritual vessel for serving food. Yang Hou saw that the consort of Lord Liao was beautiful and captivating, so he killed Lord Liao and married his consort. As a result, the ritual for receiving a consort was abolished. This account explains why the ritual was discontinued.

If institutions established by the ancient kings no longer suit the times, they should be abolished; if practices introduced by later generations are beneficial, they should be recorded. Ritual and music, therefore, have never been unchanging. The sage establishes ritual and music but is not bound by them.

In governing a state, there are enduring principles, foremost among them the welfare of the people. In political instruction and administration, there are established practices, foremost among them ensuring that orders are carried out. If something truly benefits the people, there is no need to copy ancient methods; if it truly suits the circumstances, there is no need to follow old institutions. Not every old practice is necessarily good. As the Xia and Shang declined, Jie and Zhou refused to change old methods and ultimately lost their states. When Yu, Tang, and King Wu rose to power, they did not simply copy the institutions of earlier times, and so established royal rule.

Thus, the sage changes laws in response to the times and adjusts rituals to suit prevailing customs. Clothing and implements should suit their respective uses; laws and orders, too, should be established according to actual circumstances. Changing ancient institutions is not necessarily wrong, and following custom is not always worthy of praise.

The sources of the hundred rivers differ, yet they all flow into the sea and find their destination there. The teachings of the hundred schools differ, yet all seek to bring order to society; bringing order is their essential aim. When the kingly Way declined, the Book of Songs arose to criticize the failings of royal government. When the Zhou house weakened and ritual and righteousness fell into disarray, the Spring and Autumn Annals arose to correct practices at odds with ritual and righteousness. The Book of Songs and the Spring and Autumn Annals are both excellent texts, but they came into being in times of decline. How could Confucian scholars, by relying on these texts to instruct the world, match the governance of the flourishing Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties? If we revere the Book of Songs and the Spring and Autumn Annals as the whole of ancient statecraft, we overlook the ages before they appeared. Rather than looking only at records from after the Great Way had fallen into disrepair, we should seek to understand it in its complete form.

Reciting the Songs and Documents of the ancient kings is not as good as understanding what they said. Understanding what they said is not as good as grasping why they said it. Hearing the words of a sage is not as good as sensing what the sage meant before speaking. We can grasp the principle behind their words precisely because some subtleties are difficult to express. Thus, the “Way” that can be put into words is not the constant Way. The constant Way is profound and elusive, and language cannot explain it completely, just as the sage’s subtle thoughts cannot be fully expressed.

When the Duke of Zhou served King Wen, he never acted on his own initiative or made decisions arbitrarily. He sought permission before taking action in all things. He carried himself with care and spoke with restraint. In serving King Wen, he was respectful and compliant, as though worried that he might fall short in his attentiveness. He may rightly be called a dutiful son.

After King Wu died and King Cheng was still young, the Duke of Zhou continued King Wen’s work, acting in the Son of Heaven’s stead and directing the affairs of the realm. He suppressed the rebellion of the Yi and Di peoples and punished the crimes of Guan Shu and Cai Shu, both of whom were his brothers. They had been ordered to oversee the lands of Yin, but instead helped Lufu, the son of King Zhou, spread rumors in an attempt to sow disorder in the Zhou dynasty. The Duke of Zhou had them killed for the sake of the state. This is precisely what is meant by “placing righteousness above family ties.” With his back to the screen and facing south, the Duke of Zhou received the lords of the states and decided rewards and punishments on his own, without needing to consult others about every matter. His authority shook the realm, and people throughout the four seas submitted to him. He may rightly be called capable in the conduct of military affairs.

When King Cheng came of age, the Duke of Zhou handed power back to him and transferred the registers, maps, and other records. Facing north in the posture of a subject, he presented gifts and served King Cheng. From then on, he sought permission in all matters and acted only after submitting his reports. He never seized power or boasted of his achievements or exaggerated his virtue. He may rightly be called a dutiful minister.

The Duke of Zhou’s role changed three times over the course of his life, precisely to meet the demands of different circumstances. How much more do rulers succeed one another from generation to generation, and states change their rulers? People may use their rank and authority to promote what they favor and exclude those they dislike; they may also use their power to satisfy their private desires. If one were to respond to ever-changing circumstances with a single set of rituals and one fixed law, it would plainly be impossible to judge and handle matters appropriately. What is meant by “weighing circumstances” is to devise a suitable course of action for each specific situation while staying true to the balanced and upright Way.

The fundamental principle followed by the sage is called the Way; the specific matters the sage handles are called affairs. The Way is like the pitch of bells and chimes: once set, it does not change easily. Specific affairs, however, are like the strings of a zither, which are adjusted as their tension changes. Laws and ritual principles are tools for governing people, but they are not governance itself. Bows and arrows are tools for shooting, but they cannot guarantee a hit; whether the shot succeeds also depends on the archer. The success or failure of governance depends above all on the virtue of those in power.

Humaneness is the foundation, and righteousness is the standard: these principles should never change, in any age. As for specific matters involving people, one should assess people’s abilities and continually examine actual results. So long as good methods are chosen and put into practice, they may be adjusted every day. Humaneness and righteousness cannot change, but particular measures can.

Can there really be laws for the world that never change? One should follow the times and choose what is fitting, so that government suits the circumstances of the age and the disposition of its people, accords with the movements of Heaven and Earth, and conforms to what the spirits recognize as right. Only then can the state be governed properly.

古者人醇工庞,商扑女重,醇,厚,不虚华也。工庞,气坚致也,得於人理,顺於天地,祥於鬼神,则可以正治矣。当,合也。祥,顺也。 古者人醇工庞,商扑女重,醇,厚,不虚华也。工庞,气坚致也。商扑,不为诈也。女重,贞正无邪也。是以政教易化,风俗易移也。今世德益衰,民俗益薄,欲以朴重之法,治既弊之民,是犹无镝衔橛策錣而御馯马也。镝衔,口中央铁,大如鸡子中黄,所制马口也。锻,揣头箴也。馯马,突马也。昔者神农无制令而民从,无制令,结绳以治之。唐、虞有制令而无刑罚,有制令,焕乎其有文章也。其政常仁义,民无犯法干诛,故曰无刑也。夏后氏不负言,言而结绳以治之。唐、虞有制令而无刑罚,有制令,焕乎其有文章也。其政常仁义,民无犯法干诛,故曰无刑也。夏后氏不负言,言而信也。殷人誓,以言语要誓,亦不违。周人盟。有事而会,不协而盟。盟者,杀牲歃血,以为信也。逮至当今之世,谓淮南王作此书时。忍询而轻辱,贪得而寡羞,欲以神农之道治之,则其乱必矣。伯成子高辞为诸侯而耕,天下高之。伯成子高,盖尧时人也。询,读夏后之后也。今之时人,辞官而隐处,为乡邑之下,岂可同哉。古之兵,弓剑而已矣,槽柔无击,修戟无(别)(刺)6。槽柔,木矛也。无击,无铁刃也。刺,锋也。槽,读领如蛴螬之螬也。晚世之兵,隆冲以攻,别)(刺)6。槽柔,木矛也。无击,无铁刃也。刺,锋也。槽,读领如蛴螬之螬也。晚世之兵,隆冲以攻,渠幨以守,隆,高也。冲,所以临敌城,冲突壤之。渠,渐也。一曰渠甲名也。国语曰奉文渠之甲是也。蟾,幰所以御矢也。连弩以射,销车以斗。连车弩,通一弦,以牛挽之。以刃着左右,为机开发之,曰销车。销,读絙销之销也。古之伐国,不杀黄口,不获二毛。黄口,幼也。二毛,有白发。於古为义,於今为笑。古之所以为荣者,伯成子高。今之所以为辱也。为乡邑之下也。古之所以为治者,今之所以为乱也。夫神农伏羲不施赏罚而民不为非以为辱也。为乡邑之下也。古之所以为治者,今之所以为乱也。夫神农伏羲不施赏罚而民不为非,然而立政者不能废法而治民。不能及神农伏羲。舜干戚而服有苗,舜之初,有苗叛,舜执干戚而舞於两阶之间,有苗服从之。以德化怀来也。然而征伐者不能释甲兵而制强暴。不能及舜。由此观之,法度者,所以论民俗而节缓急也,器械者,因时变而制宜适。
Interpretation

In ancient times, people were honest and simple, worked with care, and merchants did not cheat. Women were dignified and upright. Here, “pure and substantial” means solid and unadorned; “strong in their work” means possessing steady strength and doing things thoroughly; “simple merchants” means merchants who do not deceive; and “dignified women” means women who are chaste and free from wrongdoing. People acted in keeping with human relationships and reason, followed the ways of Heaven and Earth, and showed reverence and deference to the spirits. In this way, affairs of government could be properly conducted. “Proper” means fitting, and “auspicious” means compliant.

In those days, decrees and instruction were easy to put into practice, and customs easy to change. Now, as virtue declines and popular customs grow increasingly shallow, trying to govern a corrupted people with methods of simplicity and honesty is like controlling a wild horse without a bit or reins, and without whip or spur. An old commentary explains that “bit and bridle” refers to the iron bit placed in a horse’s mouth, while “whip and spur” refers to the sharp point at the end of a whip. “Wild horse” means an untamed horse.

In the past, the people obeyed even without decrees under the Divine Farmer, Shennong; tradition says that knots were used to record information and manage affairs in that age. By the time of Tang Yao and Yu Shun, decrees existed, but there were no punishments. Their governance and teaching were humane and righteous, so the people did not break the law and no one needed to be punished. The people of the Xia dynasty kept their word; the Shang people made promises by oath and did not break them. The Zhou people, in turn, held sworn covenants. When they gathered over a matter and could not agree, they would sacrifice an animal and taste its blood to swear an oath, making it a pledge of good faith.

By the time the Prince of Huainan wrote this book, people had grown willing to deceive and casually insult others, pursuing profit with little sense of shame. If one still tried to govern them by the methods of Shennong’s age, disorder would surely follow. Bocheng Zigao gave up his position as a feudal lord and returned to farming, earning the respect of everyone in the realm. He is said to have lived in the time of Yao. In ancient times, withdrawing from office to farm was considered noble. Today, someone who resigns and lives in seclusion as an ordinary villager may not deserve to be compared with Bocheng Zigao.

In ancient times, weapons consisted only of bows, arrows, and swords. Wooden spears had no iron blades, and halberds had no sharp points. In later ages, attackers used tall battering rams to besiege cities, while defenders used shields, armor, and protective screens; they also fought with repeating crossbows and war chariots. Repeating crossbows were mounted on a carriage and drawn by oxen. Blades were fitted to both sides of the carriage and activated by a mechanism; this was called a “blade chariot.” In ancient campaigns against other states, children were not killed and old men with white hair were not taken prisoner. “Yellow mouths” refers to children, and “two-colored hair” to people whose hair had turned partly white. The ancients considered this a matter of righteousness, but today some people find it laughable.

What the ancients considered honorable—such as Bocheng Zigao resigning and returning to farm—is now seen as settling for a humble life in the countryside. The methods by which the ancients governed the realm may also cause disorder today. In the time of Shennong and Fuxi, people did no wrong even without rewards or punishments. But rulers today cannot abolish laws and still govern the people, because people in the present age cannot attain the customs of Shennong and Fuxi’s time. Shun danced with a shield and a great axe, bringing the Youmiao people into submission through the influence of his virtue. Yet today, when fighting the violent and oppressive, one cannot simply lay down one’s weapons.

It follows that laws and standards are meant to measure the customs of the people and adjust the severity and urgency of governance. Weapons and equipment, in turn, should change with the times and be adapted to circumstances.

夫圣人作法而万物制焉,制犹从也。贤者立礼而不肖者拘焉。拘犹检也。制法之民,不可与远举;拘礼之人,不可使应变。耳不,制犹从也。贤者立礼而不肖者拘焉。拘犹检也。制法之民,不可与远举;拘礼之人,不可使应变。耳不知清浊之分者,不可令调音;心不知治乱之源者,不可令制法。必有独闻之耳,独见之明,然后能擅道而行矣。夫殷变夏,周变殷,春秋变周,变,改。三代之礼不同,何古之从。大人作而弟子循,循,随。知法治所由生,则应时而变;不知法治之源,虽循古,终乱。今世之法籍与时变,礼义与俗易,为学者循先袭业,据籍守旧教,以为非此不治,是犹持方枘而周员凿也,欲得宜适致固焉,则难矣。今儒墨者称三代、文、武而弗行,是言其所不行也;不能行,但言之而已。非今时之世而弗改,是行其所非也。称其所是,行其所非,是以尽日极虑而无行,但言之而已。非今时之世而弗改,是行其所非也。称其所是,行其所非,是以尽日极虑而无益於治,劳形竭智而无补於主也。今夫图工好画鬼魅,而憎图狗马者,何也?鬼魅不世出,而狗马可日见也。夫存危治乱,非智不能;道而先称古,虽愚有余。故不用之法,圣王弗行;不验之言,圣王弗听。听,受。天地之气,莫大於和。和,故能生万物。和者,阴阳调,日夜分,而生物。春分而生,秋分而成,生之与成,必得和之精。精,气。故圣人之道,宽而栗,严而温,柔而直,猛而仁。言刚柔宽猛相济也。太刚则折,太柔则卷,圣人正在刚柔之间,乃得道之本。本,源也。积阴则沉,积阳则飞,阴阳相接,乃能成和。夫绳之为度也,可卷而伸也,太刚则折,太柔则卷,圣人正在刚柔之间,乃得道之本。本,源也。积阴则沉,积阳则飞,阴阳相接,乃能成和。夫绳之为度也,可卷而伸也,引而伸之,可直而晞,晞,望。故圣人以身体之。体,行。夫修而不横,短而不穷,直而不刚,久而不忘者,其唯绳乎。故恩推则懦,懦则不威;推,犹移也。严推则猛,猛则不和;爱推则纵,纵则不令;纵,放。刑推则虐,虐则无亲。虐,害也。喜害人,人无亲之。昔者,齐简公释其国家之柄,而专任其大臣简公,悼公阳生之子任也。一德不解曰简,大臣,陈成子也。将相,摄威擅势,私门成党,而公道不行,党,群。故使陈成田常、鸱夷子皮得成其难。难,杀简公之难。使吕氏绝祀,太公姓吕,简公其后也。绝祀,陈氏代之。而陈氏有国者,此柔懦所生也。郑子阳刚毅而好罚,子阳,郑公其后也。绝祀,陈氏代之。而陈氏有国者,此柔懦所生也。郑子阳刚毅而好罚,子阳,郑君也。一曰郑相。其於罚也,执而无赦。舍人有折弓者,畏罪而恐诛,则因猘狗之惊以杀子阳,舍人,家臣也。国人逐猘狗以乱扰,舍人因之以杀子阳,畏其严也。此刚猛之所致也。今不知道者,见柔懦者侵,财矜为刚毅;见刚毅者亡,则矜於为柔懦。此本无主於中,而见闻舛驰於外者也,舛,乖。故终身而无所定趋。安,定也。趋,归也。譬犹不知音者之歌也,浊之则郁而无转,郁,湮也。转,读传译之传也。清之则燋而不讴。憔,悴也。讴,和也。及至所定趋。安,定也。趋,归也。譬犹不知音者之歌也,浊之则郁而无转,郁,湮也。转,读传译之传也。清之则燋而不讴。憔,悴也。讴,和也。及至韩娥、秦青、薛谈之讴,三人皆善讴。侯同、曼声之歌,二人善歌。一曰曼长。愤於志,积於内,盈而发音,则莫不比於律而和於人心。何则?中有本主以定清浊,不受於外而自为仪表也。
Interpretation

When sages establish laws and standards, the myriad things are brought under their regulation. Here, “regulate” means to follow and comply with them. When the worthy establish ritual institutions, the unworthy are instead constrained by them; here, “constrain” means to keep in check. Those who only know how to follow rules cannot be consulted about long-term plans, and those who cling rigidly to ritual and law cannot be entrusted with responding to change.

Someone who cannot distinguish clear tones from muddy ones by ear should not be asked to tune an instrument. Someone who does not understand the roots of order and disorder should not be asked to establish laws. Only those with distinctive insight and clear discernment can grasp the principles and apply them flexibly.

The Yin dynasty changed the institutions of the Xia dynasty, and the Zhou dynasty changed those of the Yin. By the Spring and Autumn period, the institutions of the Zhou had in turn been changed. The ritual systems of the three dynasties all differed—which one, then, should be followed? Those with understanding create institutions; later generations follow and put them into practice. Only by understanding why law and order arise can one adapt to the times. Those who do not understand their roots will cause disorder in the end, even if they copy the institutions of antiquity.

Today, laws change with the times, and ritual and righteousness change with customs. Yet scholars cling to old learning, relying on the classics to uphold old teachings and insisting that only this can govern the state. This is like trying to fit a square tenon into a round mortise: making them work together is exceedingly difficult. Confucians and Mohists now praise the institutions of the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties, and those of King Wen and King Wu of Zhou, but do not put them into practice themselves. They only talk about things that cannot be done. They reject the institutions of the present age but refuse to change them, while in practice doing precisely what they believe to be wrong. They praise the right institutions in words but follow the wrong ones in action. As a result, their constant deliberation contributes nothing to good governance; they exhaust their bodies and minds and deplete their intelligence, yet cannot help their ruler.

Painters enjoy painting ghosts and monsters but dislike painting dogs and horses. Why? Because ghosts and monsters are rarely seen in the world, while dogs and horses can be seen every day. Preserving a state and turning danger into safety require wisdom. Anyone, even a fool, can talk about the principles of antiquity. Therefore, a sage king does not put impractical laws into effect or heed words that have not been tested.

Of all the qualities of the Qi of Heaven and Earth, none is more important than harmony. Only when Yin and Yang are balanced and day and night are in equilibrium can the myriad things grow: at the spring equinox they begin to sprout, and at the autumn equinox they approach maturity. The growth and maturity of all things depend on the harmonious vital essences. Thus, the sage’s way of conducting himself is generous yet exacting, stern yet gentle, yielding yet upright, and powerful yet benevolent. It brings firmness and gentleness, leniency and severity, into balance. Excessive firmness leads to breaking; excessive gentleness leads to bending. The sage stands between firmness and gentleness, in keeping with the root of the Dao. When Yin Qi accumulates, people become sluggish; when Yang Qi accumulates, they become unsettled. Only when Yin and Yang meet can harmony take shape.

A cord can be coiled up or drawn straight. When stretched, it becomes straight and can be used for measuring. The sage puts this principle into practice in his own conduct. A cord, once prepared, does not deviate. Though short, it can be extended; though straight, it is not rigid; and even after long use, it does not lose its usefulness. Governance is the same. Excessive favor makes people weak, and weakness leaves them without authority. Excessive severity makes them fierce, and fierceness destroys harmony. Excessive indulgence makes people unruly, and unruliness makes them hard to govern. Excessive punishment becomes cruelty and alienates people.

Duke Jian of Qi, a ruler of the Spring and Autumn period, gave up control of the state and relied exclusively on his minister Chen Chengzi, also known as Tian Chang. The generals and ministers seized authority and power, forming private factions, and impartial government could no longer be carried out. Chen Chengzi, Chi Yizi Pi, and others were then able to launch the rebellion that killed Duke Jian. The sacrifices of the Lü house consequently came to an end, and the state of Qi ultimately fell into the hands of the Chen house. This was the result of weakness.

Ziyang of Zheng, a ruler of Zheng—or, according to another account, its chief minister—was forceful and decisive, but favored severe punishment and never spared anyone who had been punished. One of his household retainers broke a bow and feared he would be put to death for it. When mad dogs startled the people and sent them chasing about in confusion, the retainer seized the opportunity to kill Ziyang. This was the calamity brought on by excessive force.

Those who do not understand the art of governing see the weak being bullied and boast that they will be strong. When they see the strong fall, they turn around and boast that they will be gentle. Such people have no settled judgment of their own. They are led about by what they happen to see and hear, and so never find a sure direction in life.

This is like singing without understanding music. If the voice is muddy, it becomes clogged and faltering; if it is too bright, it turns dry and cannot blend with other sounds. Han E, Qin Qing, and Xue Tan were skilled singers; Hou Tong and Man Sheng were skilled in melodic chanting. Their feelings filled them and built up until they overflowed into sound. Their tones therefore accorded with musical principles and could move the heart. How could they do this? Because they had an inner guide: they could distinguish clear tones from muddy ones, were not led by external influences, and had their own standard for judging sound.

今夫盲者行於道,人谓之左则左,谓之右则右,遇君子则易道,遇小人则陷沟壑。何则?目无以接物也。见,(发)[接]7。故魏两用楼翟、吴起而亡西河,魏文侯任扑翟、吴起,不用他贤。秦伐,丧其西河之地。愍王专用潭齿而死于东庙,愍,读汶水之汶。愍王,田常之后,代吕氏为齐侯也。春秋之后,僭号称王。淖齿,楚将,奔齐为臣。泯王无道,淖齿杀之,擢其王专用潭齿而死于东庙,愍,读汶水之汶。愍王,田常之后,代吕氏为齐侯也。春秋之后,僭号称王。淖齿,楚将,奔齐为臣。泯王无道,淖齿杀之,擢其筋,悬庙门之梁,三日死。见战国策也。无术以御之也。文王两用吕望、召公奭而王,吕望,太公吕尚也,善用兵谋。奭,召康公,善理民物,有甘棠之歌也。楚庄王专任孙叔敖而霸,有术以御之也。孙叔敖,楚大夫荐贾伯盈子。或曰,童子也,任其贤,故致於霸也。夫弦歌鼓舞以为乐,盘旋揖让以修礼,厚葬久丧以送死,孔子之所立也,而墨子非之。非,犹讥也。兼爱上贤,右鬼非命,墨子之所立也,而杨子非之。兼三老五更;是以兼爱。选士大射,是以上贤。宗,而墨子非之。非,犹讥也。兼爱上贤,右鬼非命,墨子之所立也,而杨子非之。兼三老五更;是以兼爱。选士大射,是以上贤。宗祀严父,是以右鬼。右,犹尊也。顺四时而行,是以非命。皆杨子所不贵,故非也。全性保真,不以物累形,杨子之所立也,而孟子非之。全性保真,谓不拔骭毛,以利天下弗为,不以物累己身形也。孟子受业於子思之门,成唐虞、三代之德,叙诗、书、孔子之意,塞杨、墨淫辞,故非之也。趋舍人异,各有晓心。故是非有处,得其处则无非,失其处则无是。丹穴、太蒙、反踵、空同、大夏、北户、奇肱、修股之民,是非各异,故是非有处,得其处则无非,失其处则无是。丹穴、太蒙、反踵、空同、大夏、北户、奇肱、修股之民,是非各异,习俗相反,丹穴,南方当日下之地。太蒙,(四)[西]8方日所入处也。反踵,国名,其人南行,武迹北面。空同,戴胜极下之地。大夏,在西方。(其)〔北〕9户,在南方。奇肱、修股之民,在西南方。凡此八者,皆九州之外,八寅之域者也。君臣上下,夫妇父子,有以相使也。此之是,非彼之是也;此之非,非彼之非也。此,近谕诸华也。彼,远谕八寅也。於诸华之所是,八寅之所非而废也;於诸华所非,八寅所是而行也。譬若斤斧椎凿之各有所施也。施,宜。禹之时,以五音听治,禹,颛顼后五世鲧之子也,名文命。受禅成功曰禹。五音,宫商角征羽也。悬钟鼓磬铎,置鼗,以待四方之士,为号曰,教寡人以道者击鼓,道和阴
Interpretation

A blind person walking along a road will turn left when someone tells him to go left, and right when told to go right. If he meets a gentleman, he may find the right path; if he meets a petty person, he may fall into a ditch. Why does this happen? Because his eyes cannot distinguish things outside himself. In the scripture, the character “see” has been emended to “make contact with”: it means that the eyes cannot make contact with or discern things outside themselves.

The state of Wei appointed Lou Zhai and Wu Qi at the same time, yet lost the western region of the Yellow River. Marquis Wen of Wei employed Lou Zhai and Wu Qi but failed to appoint other worthy men. Later, Qin attacked Wei, and Wei lost the western region of the Yellow River. King Min of Qi appointed Nao Chi alone and eventually died in the Eastern Ancestral Temple. King Min was a ruler of the Tian family, which came after Tian Chang and replaced the Lü family as lords of Qi; after the Spring and Autumn period, he arrogated to himself the title of king. Nao Chi had originally been a general of Chu, but later defected to Qi and became its minister. King Min of Qi was immoral, so Nao Chi killed him, drew out his tendons, and hung them from the crossbeam above the temple gate. He died three days later. These events are recorded in the Strategies of the Warring States. These rulers did not understand how to direct their ministers.

King Wen of Zhou appointed Lü Wang and the Duke of Shao at the same time, and thereby established the royal enterprise. Lü Wang was Grand Duke Lü Shang, skilled in military strategy. The Duke of Shao, also known as Duke Kang of Shao, was skilled at governing the people and left behind the poem “Sweet Pear Tree.” King Zhuang of Chu appointed Sun Shuao alone and thus became hegemon among the feudal lords. This was because he understood how to direct his ministers. Sun Shuao was a senior official of Chu, recommended by Jia Boyingzi; some also say he was a boy. King Zhuang of Chu appointed the worthy Sun Shuao and thus achieved hegemony.

Playing the zither and singing, and beating drums and dancing for entertainment, were advocated by Confucius. So too were circling in ritual bows and yielding to one another to practice the rites, and burying the dead with lavish funerals and mourning for a long time to send them off. Mozi opposed these practices; here, “opposed” means to censure or criticize.

Loving all people, honoring the worthy, revering ghosts and spirits, and rejecting the doctrine of fixed destiny were advocated by Mozi, but Yangzi criticized these ideas. Showing love to the elderly and those of advanced years exemplifies Mozi’s teaching of universal love; selecting scholars to take part in the grand archery ceremony exemplifies honoring the worthy; making offerings to ancestors and showing reverence to one’s father exemplifies revering ghosts and spirits; and acting in accordance with the changing seasons exemplifies Mozi’s rejection of fixed destiny. Yangzi did not esteem these practices, so he criticized them.

Preserving one’s natural endowment and safeguarding one’s true nature, without allowing external things to harm the body, were advocated by Yangzi, but Mencius criticized him. Preserving one’s natural endowment and safeguarding one’s true nature meant refusing even to pluck a single hair from one’s leg to benefit the world. Not allowing external things to harm oneself meant not letting them burden one’s body. Mencius had studied under Zisi and inherited the virtues of Tang Yao, Yu Shun, and the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties. He expounded the Songs, Documents, and Confucius’s thought, and rebutted the extreme views of Yang Zhu and Mozi. That is why he criticized Yangzi.

People make different choices, and their understanding rests on different grounds. Therefore, whether something is right or wrong must be judged in its particular circumstances: what fits those circumstances is not wrong, and what does not fit them is not right. The people of Danxue, Taimeng, Fanzhong, Kongtong, Daxia, Beihu, Qigong, and Xiugu had different standards of right and wrong, and their customs also differed from one another.

Danxue lies in the south, directly beneath the sun’s path; Taimeng lies in the west, where the sun sets. Fanzhong is the name of a state whose people walk southward, yet leave footprints facing north. Kongtong lies at the farthest point below the place where the crested bird lives; Daxia lies in the west; Beihu lies in the south. The people of Qigong and Xiugu live in the southwest. All eight places lie beyond the Nine Provinces, in remote regions at the edges of the eight directions.

Rulers and ministers, those above and below, husbands and wives, fathers and sons—all have relationships in which they serve and complement one another. What is considered right here is not necessarily considered right there; what is considered wrong here is not necessarily considered wrong there. “Here” refers to the states of the Central Plain, and “there” to the remote regions in the eight directions. What the Central Plain considers right may be discarded in the borderlands; what the Central Plain considers wrong may be practiced there instead. It is like an axe, a chisel, and a hammer: each has its proper use.

When Yu the Great governed the realm, he listened to affairs of state through the five musical notes. Yu was a descendant of Zhuanxu and the son of Gun. His personal name was Wenming; he was called Yu because he received the abdication and established great achievements. The five notes are gong, shang, jue, zhi, and yu. Yu hung bells, drums, stone chimes, and clappers, set out a small hand drum, and waited for worthy people to come from the four directions. He established signals: whoever came to teach him the art of governing was to strike the drum…

阳,鼓一声以颛顼后五世鲧之子也,名文命。受禅成功曰禹。五音,宫商角征羽也。悬钟鼓磬铎,置鼗,以待四方之士,为号曰,教寡人以道者击鼓,道和阴 阳,鼓一声以调五音,故击之。论寡人以事者振铎,铎,铃,金口木舌,合为音声,事者非一品,故振之。语寡人以忧者击磬,磬,石也,声急。忧亦急务,故击磬。有狱讼者摇鼗。狱亦讼。讼一辩於事,故取小靶鼗。当此之时,一馈而十起,一沐而三捉发,馈者,食也。以劳天下之民,劳,犹忧也。劳读劳来之劳也。此而不能达善效忠者,则才不足也。当此之时,不能达其善,效致其忠,自为无有其才也。 秦之时,高为台榭,大为苑囿,远为驰道,铸金人,秦皇帝二十六年,初兼天下,有长人见不能达其善,效致其忠,自为无有其才也。
Interpretation

When Yu, the legendary ancient sage ruler, was emperor, he hung bells, drums, stone chimes, and wooden clappers before the palace gate, and set out small hand drums to receive visitors from the four directions. He announced: “Anyone who wishes to discuss the Way of governing the state with me should beat the drum.”

The drum sounded to harmonize the Five Tones—gong, shang, jue, zhi, and yu—so the drum served as a signal. Anyone who wished to present matters of state should shake the clapper. A clapper is a kind of bell, with a metal mouth and a wooden tongue that sounds when shaken. Since matters of state are many and varied, the clapper served as their signal. Anyone who wished to speak of troubles should strike the stone chime. The chime is a stone instrument with a sharp, urgent sound; troubles, too, are urgent matters, so the chime served as their signal. Those with a legal case should shake the small hand drum. A legal case requires arguing over the facts, so the small drum served as its signal.

At that time, in order to hear the views of people throughout the realm, Yu would rise ten times during a single meal and pause three times to gather up his hair while washing it, receiving visitors each time. Here, “feed” means a meal, while “toil” means being troubled on behalf of the people and caring for their welfare. If, even in such circumstances, a person cannot express good intentions, offer loyal advice, and speak frankly, then that person simply lacks the ability to do so.

In the Qin dynasty, Qin Shi Huang undertook major construction projects, building lofty terraces and pavilions, vast hunting parks, and distant imperial roads, and casting bronze figures as well. In the twenty-sixth year of Qin Shi Huang’s reign (221 BCE), just after the Qin state had unified the realm, a very tall man appeared…

秦之时,高为台榭,大为苑囿,远为驰道,铸金人,秦皇帝二十六年,初兼天下,有长人见於临洮,其高五丈,足迹六尺。放写其形,铸金人以象之,翁仲、君何是也。发适戍,入刍槁,戍,守长城也。入槁弃之税,以(徘)[供]10国用也。头会箕赋,输於少府。头会,随民口数,人青其税。箕赋,似箕然,敛民财多,取意也。少府,官名,如今司农。丁壮丈夫,西至临洮、狄道,临洮,垄西之县,洮水出北。狄道,汉阳之县少府,官名,如今司农。丁壮丈夫,西至临洮、狄道,临洮,垄西之县,洮水出北。狄道,汉阳之县是也。东至会稽、浮石、会稽,山名也。浮石,随水高下,言不没。皆在辽西界。一说,会稽山在太山下,封于太山,禅於会稽是也。会稽或作沧海。南至豫章、桂林,豫章,豫章郡。桂林,郁林郡也。北至飞狐、阳原,飞狐,盖在代郡南飞狐山也。阳原,盖在太原。或曰,代郡广昌东五阮门是也。道路死人以沟量。言满沟也。当此之时,忠谏者谓之不祥,而道仁义者谓之狂。
Interpretation

During the Qin dynasty, Qin Shi Huang built very high terraces and pavilions, laid out vast pleasure gardens and hunting parks, constructed distant imperial highways for rapid travel by carriage and horse, and cast bronze giants.

In the twenty-sixth year of Qin Shi Huang’s reign (221 BCE), just after he had unified the realm, a giant appeared at Lintao, in what is now the Gansu region. He stood five zhang tall, and his footprints measured six chi in length. The Qin modeled bronze giants on his appearance to represent him. These were known as Weng Zhong and Jun He.

The Qin conscripted men fit for garrison duty and collected fodder for horses. “Garrison service” meant guarding the Great Wall. The fodder levy was a tax used to cover state expenses. The Qin also imposed what was called “head-count levies and basket levies”: “head-count levies” meant collecting taxes from each person individually, while “basket levies” likened the exaction of large quantities of goods from the people to gathering them up with a winnowing basket. The proceeds were sent to the Shaofu, an office responsible for the palace finances and provisions.

After being conscripted, adult men were sent west to Lintao and Didao. Lintao was a county in Longxi Commandery, with the Tao River flowing from its northern side; Didao was a county in Hanyang Commandery. They were sent east to Kuaiji and Fushi. Kuaiji was a mountain; Fushi, said to rise and fall with the water without sinking, was also in the Liaoxi region. Another account places Mount Kuaiji beneath Mount Tai: Qin Shi Huang performed the Feng and Shan sacrifices at Mount Tai, then went to Kuaiji to perform a Shan sacrifice. Some also say that “Kuaiji” refers to the Eastern Sea. To the south, men were sent to Yuzhang and Guilin: Yuzhang was a commandery, and Guilin was Yulin Commandery. To the north, they were sent to Feihu and Yangyuan. Feihu was probably around Mount Feihu, south of Dai Commandery; Yangyuan was probably in Taiyuan, though some say it was at Wuyuan Gate, east of Guangchang County in Dai Commandery.

The dead along the roads were so numerous that they could be counted by the ditches; in other words, bodies filled the ditches. At such a time, those who offered loyal remonstrance were condemned as bringing ill fortune, while those who upheld benevolence and righteousness were called mad.

逮至高皇帝,存亡继绝,汉高祖刘季也。举天下之大义,身自奋袂执锐,以为百姓请命于皇天。执利兵伐无道,以求百姓之命,祈之於皇天也。当此之时,天下雄隽豪英暴露于野泽,才过千人为隽,百人为豪,万人为英也。前蒙矢石,而后堕溪壑,出百死而给一此之时,天下雄隽豪英暴露于野泽,才过千人为隽,百人为豪,万人为英也。前蒙矢石,而后堕溪壑,出百死而给一生,以争天下之权,堕,入也。给,至也。给读仍代之代也。奋武厉诚,以决一旦之命。当此之时,丰衣博带而道儒墨者,以为不肖。言尚武也。逮至暴乱已胜,胜暴乱也。海内大定,继文之业,立武之功,继文王受命之业,武王诛无道之功。履天子之图籍,造刘氏之貌冠,高祖於新丰下作竹皮冠也。(之)[一〕11曰委貌冠。总邹、鲁之儒墨,通先圣之遗教,戴天子之旗,乘大路,建九斿,撞大钟,击鸣鼓,奏咸池,扬干戚,周礼,天子五路。大路,上路也。圣之遗教,戴天子之旗,乘大路,建九斿,撞大钟,击鸣鼓,奏咸池,扬干戚,周礼,天子五路。大路,上路也。王者功成作乐,故撞钟击鼓。咸池,黄帝乐也。干,楯也。戚,斧也。春夏舞者所执。当此之时,有立武者见疑。疑,怪也。一世之问,而文武代为雌雄,有时而用也。今世之为武者则非文也,为文者则非武也,文武更相非,而不知时世之用也。此见隅曲之一指,而不知八极之广大也。隅曲,室中之区隅,言狭小。八极,八方之极言广大也。故东面而望,不见西墙,南面而视,不睹北方,唯无所向者,则无所不通。无所向,则可以见四方,故曰无所不通。
Interpretation

In the time of Emperor Gao (Liu Bang, founder of the Han dynasty, whose given name was Ji), the state survived and its broken line of succession was restored. He raised the great cause of setting the world to rights. With his own hands he shook out his robes and sleeves, took up weapons, and prayed to Heaven to preserve the lives of the people. He took up sharp weapons to punish the unrighteous, seeking to rescue the people from danger, and for this purpose he also prayed to august Heaven.

At that time, the outstanding talents and heroes of the realm fought in the open country. Those whose abilities surpassed a thousand were called “jùn,” those who surpassed a hundred “háo,” and those who surpassed ten thousand “yīng.” Before them, arrows and flying stones threatened; behind them, they might plunge into ravines. They endured every kind of mortal danger for the chance to survive, all in pursuit of rule over the realm. They fought with all their strength and gave their utmost loyalty, determined to decide victory or defeat in a day or two. For this reason, people who wore wide robes and broad sashes and discussed the teachings of the Confucians and Mohists were considered out of step with the times: martial force was then held in esteem.

Once the rebellions had been put down and the realm brought to peace, the court carried forward the work of civil governance and established military achievements. When Gaozu ascended the throne as Son of Heaven, he instituted the Liu house’s system of ceremonial dress and headgear. Near Xinfeng, he had bamboo-bark caps made; these were called weimao caps. He gathered scholars of the Confucian and Mohist traditions from the regions of Zou and Lu, carrying on the teachings left by the ancient sages. He used the Son of Heaven’s banners, rode in the Great Chariot—the ceremonial carriage reserved for the Son of Heaven—and raised a banner with nine streamers. Bells were struck and drums beaten as the music of the Yellow Emperor, “Xianchi,” was performed, while dancers held shields and axes. According to the Rites of Zhou, the Son of Heaven had five kinds of chariot, of which the Great Chariot was the most exalted. In antiquity, rulers composed musical pieces after completing great achievements; hence bells were struck and drums beaten. Dancers held shields and axes as part of the ritual performance of ancient music and dance.

In such an age, those who established military achievements might nevertheless come under suspicion. In any given age, civil governance and military force may take turns in the leading role, each suited to its own time. Today, those engaged in military affairs reject civil governance, while those devoted to civil governance reject military affairs. They attack one another without understanding that they should respond to the needs of the times. This is like seeing only a small corner of a house and failing to grasp the vastness of the world in all eight directions. Look east, and the western wall is out of sight; look south, and the north cannot be seen. Only by refusing to fix one’s gaze in a single direction can one gain an unobstructed view on all sides.

国之所以存者,道德也,道德施行,民说其化,故国存也。家之所以亡者,理塞也。理,道。尧无百户之郭,舜无置锥之地,以有天下。禹无十人之众,汤无七里之分,以王诸侯。文王处岐周也。理,道。尧无百户之郭,舜无置锥之地,以有天下。禹无十人之众,汤无七里之分,以王诸侯。文王处岐周之间也,地方不过百里,而立为天子者,有王道也。尧、舜、禹、汤、文王,皆王有天下,孟子曰,以德行仁者,身王不待,亦是也。夏桀、殷纣之盛也,人迹所至、舟车所通,莫不为郡县,然而身死人手,而为天下笑者,有亡形也。孟子曰,恶死亡,乐不仁,不仁必死亡,故曰有亡形也。故圣人见化以观其征,征,成。德有盛衰,风先萌焉。风,气也。萌,见也。有盛德者,谓文王也。伯夷、太公先见之。有衰德者,谓桀。太史令终古及向艺先去之也。故得王道者,虽小必大;汤武是也。有亡形者,虽成必败。桀纣是也。夫夏之将见之。有衰德者,谓桀。太史令终古及向艺先去之也。故得王道者,虽小必大;汤武是也。有亡形者,虽成必败。桀纣是也。夫夏之将亡,太史令终古先奔於商,三年而桀乃亡。汤灭之也。殷之将败也,太史令向艺先归文王,期年而纣乃亡。武王灭之。故圣人之见存亡之迹,成败之际也,非乃鸣条之野,甲子之日也。汤伐桀,禽於鸣条。武王诛纣,以甲子克之。今谓强者胜则度地计众,富者利则量粟称金,若此,则千乘之君无不霸王者,而万乘之国无不破亡者矣。存亡之迹,若此其易知也,愚夫意妇皆能论之。憃亦愚,无智之貌也。
Interpretation

A state endures through De (Virtue). When De is put into practice, the people willingly accept its teachings, and the state therefore survives. A family falls into ruin when the principles of governance are obstructed. “Principle” means the Dao (the Way).

Yao had no walled city with even a hundred households, and Shun had not so much as a patch of land to stand on, yet both came to possess all under Heaven. Yu had fewer than ten men under his command, and Tang’s territory extended only seven li in each direction, yet both became kings among the feudal lords. King Wen lived around Qizhou, with no more than a hundred li of land, yet became Son of Heaven. They achieved this by putting the kingly way into practice. Yao, Shun, Yu, Tang, and King Wen each established kingly rule as sovereigns of all under Heaven. The Mengzi says, “One who practices benevolent government through virtue can become king without waiting for any special conditions.” This expresses the same principle.

At the height of their power, Jie of Xia and Zhou of Yin ruled everywhere people could travel on foot, by boat, or by cart. Yet in the end they died at others’ hands and became a laughingstock to all under Heaven. This was because the signs of their downfall had already appeared. The Mengzi says that those who fear death yet delight in what is inhumane are bound to meet death. The inhumane are therefore already showing signs of ruin.

Sages observe how things change and use this to recognize the signs. A “sign” is a trace of something beginning to show itself. Virtue waxes and wanes, and the prevailing atmosphere reveals its first stirrings in advance. “Atmosphere” refers to the tenor and prevailing spirit of the times; “stirring” means that something is beginning to emerge. The ruler whose virtue flourished was King Wen of Zhou, and Boyi and Taigong Wang saw this first. The ruler whose virtue declined was Jie of Xia; the Grand Historian Zhonggu and Xiang Yi left him one after the other.

Thus, one who has gained the kingly way will eventually grow from small beginnings, however weak he may be. Tang of Shang and King Wu of Zhou were like this. One who shows signs of ruin will ultimately fail, however powerful he may seem for a time. Jie of Xia and Zhou of Yin were like this. When the Xia dynasty was about to fall, the Grand Historian Zhonggu fled first to the state of Shang; three years later, Jie was overthrown. Tang of Shang destroyed the Xia. When the Yin dynasty was about to fall, the Grand Historian Xiang Yi first went over to King Wen of Zhou; a year later, Zhou of Yin was overthrown. King Wu of Zhou destroyed the Shang.

Sages can therefore discern the signs of a state’s survival or demise and the turning points between success and failure. They do not wait until the Battle of Mingtiao or the day of Jiazi to know what will happen. At the wilderness of Mingtiao, Tang of Shang defeated and captured Jie of Xia; on the day of Jiazi, King Wu of Zhou campaigned against Zhou of Yin and emerged victorious.

Today, some people believe that the strong inevitably win, as long as they measure land and count people, and that the wealthy inevitably prosper, as long as they weigh grain and tally gold and silver. If this were true, no feudal state with a thousand chariots would fail to dominate, and no great power with ten thousand chariots would ever perish. If the signs of a state’s survival or demise were really so easy to judge, even the dullest men and women could explain them clearly.

赵襄子以晋阳之城霸,智伯以三晋之地擒;智伯,智县。襄子,无恤也。三晋,智氏兼有韩,魏,智伯帅韩魏之君围赵襄子於晋阳,赵襄子使张孟谈与韩魏通谋,韩魏反而击之,大破智伯之军,获其首,以为饮器。故曰以三晋之地擒也。愍王以大之君围赵襄子於晋阳,赵襄子使张孟谈与韩魏通谋,韩魏反而击之,大破智伯之军,获其首,以为饮器。故曰以三晋之地擒也。愍王以大齐亡,为淳齿所杀也。田单以即墨有功。燕伐齐而(代)[灭]12之,得七十城,唯即墨未下。田单以市吏率即墨市民以击燕师,破之,故能有功也。故国之亡也,虽大不足恃,大犹亡,智伯是。道之行也,虽小不可轻。汤以七十里,文王以百里,皆有天下,故虽小不可轻也。由此观之,存在得道而不在於大也,得道之君,虽小,为善而能王天下,故曰不在於大也。亡在失道而不在於小也。无道之君,虽小,以为恶无伤而弗革,积必亡,故曰不在於小也。诗云,乃眷西顾,此惟与宅。言去殷而迁于周也。纣治朝歌,在东。文王国於岐周,在西。天乃眷然顾西土,积必亡,故曰不在於小也。诗云,乃眷西顾,此惟与宅。言去殷而迁于周也。纣治朝歌,在东。文王国於岐周,在西。天乃眷然顾西土,此唯居周言我宅也。故曰去殷而迁于周也。故乱国之君,务广其地而不务仁义,务高其位而不务道德,是释其所以存,而造其所以亡也。故桀囚於焦门,而不能自非其所行,不自非行之恶。而悔不杀汤於夏台,台,或作宫。纣拘於宣室,而不反其过,反,悔。而悔不诛文王於羑里。悔,恨也。羑里,今河内汤阴是也。羑,古牖守。二君处强大势位,修仁义之道,汤、武救罪之不给,何谋之敢当。二君,桀、纣也。当其君也,今河内汤阴是也。羑,古牖守。二君处强大势位,修仁义之道,汤、武救罪之不给,何谋之敢当。二君,桀、纣也。当其君也,强大之势,不能自知所行之非也。假令能修仁义之道,则汤武不敢生诛之谋也。若上乱三光之明,下失万民之心,三光,日、月、星辰也。失万民心,施民所恶也。虽微汤、武,孰弗能夺也。言遭人能夺之,不必汤武也。今不审其在己者,而反备之于人,言不慎行己之德,而乃反备天下之人来诛也。天下非一汤、武也,杀一人,则必有继之者也。且汤武之所以处小弱而能以王者,以其有道也。桀、纣之所以处强大而见夺者,以其无道也。今也。天下非一汤、武也,杀一人,则必有继之者也。且汤武之所以处小弱而能以王者,以其有道也。桀、纣之所以处强大而见夺者,以其无道也。今不行人之所以王者,而反益己之所以夺,是趋亡之道也。武王克殷,欲筑宫於五行之山。五行山,今太行山也。在何内野王县北上党关也。周公曰,不可。夫五行之山,固塞险阻之地也。使我德能覆之,则天下纳其贡职者回也。回,迂难也。回,或作固。固,必也。使我有暴乱之行,则天下之伐我难矣。周公言我有暴乱之行,则天下当来伐我,无为於五行之山,使天下来伐我者难也。言其依德,不侍险也。此所以三十六世而不夺也。周公可谓能持满矣。满,满而不溢也。故曰能持满也。
Interpretation

Zhao Xiangzi relied on Jinyang to become hegemon, yet Zhibo was captured and killed despite controlling the territory of the Three Jin. Zhibo was the head of the Zhi clan, and Zhao Xiangzi’s personal name was Wuxu. Here, “Three Jin” refers to Zhibo’s alliance with the Han and Wei clans. Zhibo led the rulers of the Han and Wei clans in besieging Zhao Xiangzi at Jinyang. Zhao Xiangzi secretly sent Zhang Mengtan to make contact with Han and Wei. They turned against Zhibo, routed his army, cut off his head, and made it into a drinking vessel. Thus, although Zhibo controlled the territory of the Three Jin, he was ultimately captured.

King Min of Qi was killed by Chunyu Kun despite the strength of the Qi state, while Tian Dan won distinction by holding Jimo. Yan attacked Qi and captured seventy cities, leaving only Jimo unconquered. Tian Dan had originally served as a market official. He led the people of Jimo in a counterattack against Yan, defeated its army, and thereby established his merit.

Whether a state survives or falls therefore cannot be judged by the size of its territory alone. Even a vast state may perish, as Zhibo’s case shows. When the Way of governance is put into practice, even a small state should not be underestimated. Shang Tang held a fief of only seventy li, and King Wen of Zhou one of only a hundred li, yet both eventually gained the realm. A state’s survival depends on whether it follows the Way, not on the size of its territory. When a ruler follows the Way, even a small state can govern well and become sovereign over the realm. When a ruler strays from the Way, even a small state will perish through wrongdoing.

The Book of Songs says, “Heaven looked toward the West and made this place its dwelling.” This means that Heaven turned away from Yin and favored Zhou. King Zhou of Shang ruled the realm from Chaoge in the East, while King Wen established his state at Qizhou in the West. Heaven’s favor turning toward the West means that Zhou replaced Yin as the dwelling place of the realm.

Thus, a ruler who brings disorder to a state may devote himself to expanding its territory and elevating its status, yet neglect benevolence, righteousness, and virtue. In doing so, he abandons the very foundation of the state’s survival and instead heads toward its downfall. When Xia Jie was imprisoned at Jiaomen, he refused to admit that his conduct was wrong and regretted only that he had not killed Shang Tang at Xiatái. When King Zhou of Shang was detained in the Xuan Chamber, he likewise refused to reflect on his faults and regretted only that he had not killed King Wen of Zhou at Youli. Youli was in the area of present-day Tangyin, Henan.

Jie and Zhou held powerful positions but could not see the wrong in their own conduct. Had they cultivated benevolence and righteousness, Shang Tang and King Wu of Zhou would not have plotted to overthrow them. If a ruler above violates the order embodied in the movements of Heaven, Earth, the sun, moon, and stars, and below loses the people’s support, someone will seize his power even without a Tang or a Wu. Here, the “Three Luminaries” means the sun, moon, and stars. To lose the people’s support is to govern in ways that run counter to what the people abhor.

Failing to examine what one ought to do while constantly guarding against others who might overthrow one is to mistake the root for the branch. There is not just one Tang or one Wu in the realm. Kill one challenger, and another will come after him. Tang and Wu became kings while still weak because they followed the Way; Jie and Zhou lost power while still strong because they did not. To refuse to learn from the principles that enabled Tang and Wu to become kings, and instead intensify the conduct that caused Jie and Zhou to lose their states, is to head toward ruin.

After King Wu of Zhou conquered Yin, he wanted to build a palace on Mount Wuxing, also known as the Taihang Mountains. The Duke of Zhou advised against it, saying that Mount Wuxing was steep and easy to defend. If their virtue were sufficient to transform the realm, the feudal lords would come of their own accord to pay tribute. If they governed tyrannically, the terrain would obstruct the realm from attacking them. The Duke of Zhou’s point was that a state should rely on virtue rather than on defensible terrain. The Zhou dynasty was consequently able to pass through thirty-six generations without losing control of the realm. The Duke of Zhou may well be said to have known how to preserve fullness without letting it overflow.

昔者,周书有言曰,周史之书。上言者,下用也;下言者,上用也。可否相济。上言者,常也;为君常也。下言者,权也。此存亡之术也。权,谋也。言曰,周史之书。上言者,下用也;下言者,上用也。可否相济。上言者,常也;为君常也。下言者,权也。此存亡之术也。权,谋也。谋度事宜,不失其道也。唯圣人为能知权。言而必信,期而必当,天下之高行也。直躬其父攘羊而子证之,直躬,楚叶县人也。叶公子高谓孔子曰,吾党有直躬者,其父攘羊而子证之。孔子曰,吾党之直者异於是,父为子隐,子为父隐,直在其中矣。凡六畜自来,而取之曰攘之。尾生与妇人期而死之。尾生,鲁人,与妇人期於梁下,水至溺死也。直而证父,信而溺死,虽有直信,孰能贵之。在其中矣。凡六畜自来,而取之曰攘之。尾生与妇人期而死之。尾生,鲁人,与妇人期於梁下,水至溺死也。直而证父,信而溺死,虽有直信,孰能贵之。夫三军矫命,过之大者也。秦穆公兴兵袭郑,过周而东。以兵伐国,不击鼓,密声,曰袭。周者,王城也。公羊传曰,王城者,河西周也。今河南县也。郑贾人弦高将西贩牛,道遇秦师於周郑之间,乃矫郑伯之命,犒以十二牛,宾秦师而却之,非君命也,而称君命,曰矫。酒肉曰向,牛羊曰犒,芬其枯槁也。秦师曰行千里而袭之,远主有备而师无继,不如还,遂还师而去也,故曰却之。以存郑国。故事有所至,信反为过,诞反为功。信为过者,尾生是。诞为功者,弦高是也。何谓失礼而有大功,昔楚恭王战於阴陵,恭王与晋厉战於阴陵,吕锜射於恭王,中(厥)〔目〕13因而擒之功者,弦高是也。何谓失礼而有大功,昔楚恭王战於阴陵,恭王与晋厉战於阴陵,吕锜射於恭王,中(厥)〔目〕13因而擒之。过而能改,故曰恭也。潘尪、养由基、黄衰微、公孙丙相与篡之,四子,楚大夫,篡晋取恭王。衰,读绳之维。微读抆诚之抆也。恭王惧而失体,威仪不如常,坐不能起也。黄衰微举足蹴其体,恭王乃觉。怒其失礼,奋体而起,四大夫载而行。失礼,谓举足蹴君也。昔苍吾绕娶妻而美,以让兄,此所谓忠爱而不可行者也。苍吾绕,孔子时人。以妻美好,推与其兄。於兄则爱矣,而违亲近曲顾之义,故曰不可行也。是故圣人论事之扃曲直,与之屈伸偃仰,无常仪表,时屈时伸。卑弱柔如蒲韦,非摄夺也;刚强猛毅,志厉青云,非本矜也;以乘时应变也。夫君臣之接,屈膝卑拜,以相尊礼也;至其迫於患也,则举足蹙其体,天下莫能非也志厉青云,非本矜也;以乘时应变也。夫君臣之接,屈膝卑拜,以相尊礼也;至其迫於患也,则举足蹙其体,天下莫能非也。是故忠之所在,礼不足以难之也。孝子之事亲,和颜卑体,奉带运履,运,正回也。至其溺也,则捽其发而拯,拯,升也。出溺曰拯也。非敢骄侮,以救其死也。故溺则捽父,祝则名君,孟子曰,嫂溺而不拯,是豺狼也。而况父兄乎。故溺则拯之。祝则名君,周人以讳事神敬至也。势不得不然也,此权之所设也。故孔子曰,可以共学矣,而未可以适道也。适,之。道,仁义之善道。可与适道,未可以立也。立德、立功、立言。可以立,未可与权。权者,圣人之所独见也。故忤而以适道也。适,之。道,仁义之善道。可与适道,未可以立也。立德、立功、立言。可以立,未可与权。权者,圣人之所独见也。故忤而后合者,谓之知权。忤,逆不合也。权,因事制宜,权量轻重,无常形势,能(合)〔令〕14丑反善,合於宜适,故圣人独见之也。合而后舛者,谓之不知权。不知权者,善反丑矣。故礼者,实之华而伪之文也,方於卒迫穷遽之中也,则无所用矣。无所用於礼也。是故圣人以文交於世,而以实从事於宜,不结於一迹之涂,凝滞而不化,是故败事少而成事多,号令行于天下而莫之能非矣。结,犹众也。
Interpretation

An ancient text, the Book of Zhou, records: “What those in high positions say should be carried out by those below them; what those below say should also be taken up by those above them. The views of both sides complement one another, and only then can matters be handled properly. The words of those above represent the established norms, the constant Way that a ruler should follow; the words of those below concern adapting to changing circumstances. This is a way of determining whether a state will survive or perish. To adapt to changing circumstances is to plan and weigh whether a course of action is appropriate, without straying from the right path. Only a sage can understand how to do this.”

Keeping one’s word and fulfilling one’s promises are virtues esteemed throughout the world. Yet focusing only on keeping one’s word can itself lead to error. In the state of Chu, a man from Ye County named Zhigong reported his own father for stealing a sheep. When Lord Ye told Confucius about this, Confucius said, “The upright people of my home are different: a father conceals his son’s wrongdoing, and a son conceals his father’s. Uprightness lies in this bond of family affection.” Here, “appropriating” means that an animal wandered over by itself and someone then claimed it as their own.

Weisheng, a man of the state of Lu, arranged to meet a woman beneath a bridge. When the water rose, he still would not leave, because he had promised to stay. In the end, he drowned. Reporting one’s father may be forthright, and keeping a promise even at the cost of drowning may be faithful—but what is there to praise in this kind of forthrightness or faithfulness? These stories show that clinging to principles while ignoring the circumstances can lead to an inappropriate outcome.

For a military force to falsely claim a ruler’s command is a serious offense. Duke Mu of Qin once sent troops to make a surprise attack on Zheng. As the army passed through Zhou territory, Xian Gao, a merchant from Zheng who was heading west to trade cattle, encountered them. He falsely claimed to be acting on the orders of the ruler of Zheng, presented the Qin army with twelve oxen, and received them as honored guests. This led the Qin army to abandon its plan to attack and turn back, saving Zheng. Xian Gao had no command from his ruler, but pretended that he did; this is called “falsifying a command.” Food and drink offered to troops were called provisions; giving cattle and sheep to comfort and reward an army was called an offering. The Qin army reasoned that, having marched a thousand li to attack Zheng, and now finding Zheng prepared and themselves without reinforcements, it would be better to withdraw. So they turned back.

These stories show that when circumstances reach a certain point, keeping one’s word may become a mistake, while deception may earn merit. Weisheng’s story shows that keeping a promise can be inappropriate; Xian Gao’s shows that falsely claiming an order can sometimes save a state.

What does it mean to violate proper conduct yet achieve a great deed? Duke Gong of Chu fought Duke Li of Jin at Yinling. The Chu general Lü Qi shot Duke Gong in the eye, and the king was captured. Later, Duke Gong lost his composure and all dignity, and could not get up from where he sat. The Chu officials Pan Yao, Yang Youji, Huang Shuaiwei, and Gongsun Bing discussed how to rescue him. Huang Shuaiwei kicked Duke Gong, and the king, angered by this breach of respect, sprang up. The four men seized the opportunity and carried him away. Kicking a king was indeed discourteous, but it helped him escape danger. Duke Gong later corrected his faults, and so received the posthumous title “Gong,” meaning “Reverent.”

Long ago, Cangwu Rao married a beautiful woman and wanted to give her to his elder brother. This may seem generous and fraternal, but it was inappropriate: he cared only about treating his brother well and disregarded the principle that husband and wife should be close and look after one another. This conduct is therefore not to be recommended.

Thus, when sages judge whether an action is right or wrong, they adjust their advance and withdrawal to the circumstances rather than clinging to a fixed posture. Humility and gentleness are not always meant to gain something; strength, courage, and lofty ambition do not necessarily spring from an arrogant nature. Such qualities can be ways of responding to the times and adapting to change. In the relationship between ruler and minister, kneeling in greeting expresses mutual respect. In an emergency, if the only way to save the ruler is to kick him, people throughout the world will not blame the rescuer for it. Where true loyalty lies, ritual propriety must not become an obstacle.

A filial child serves their parents with a pleasant expression and attentive respect in ordinary times. But if their father falls into the water, they should grab him by the hair and pull him out. This is neither arrogance nor an insult to the father; it is a way to save his life. When rescuing someone from drowning, one may even need to call the ruler by his personal name. The Zhou people avoided speaking the names of spirits during sacrifices out of reverence, but circumstances might force them to call a spirit by name. This is how adapting to changing circumstances is useful.

Confucius said, “One may study alongside someone and yet not be able to walk together with them on the right path; one may walk with them on the right path and yet not be able to develop virtue, achievements, and teachings together; one may achieve these things together and yet still not be able to apply situational judgment together.” Here, “to follow the Way” means to set out on the path of benevolence and righteousness. “To establish” means to accomplish virtue, achievements, and teachings. “Situational judgment” is the sage’s ability to weigh competing considerations in light of particular circumstances and arrive at an appropriate decision.

When something first appears to contradict the right path but ultimately accords with it, this is called understanding how to adapt to changing circumstances. Such judgment means acting in accordance with the situation and weighing what matters; it has no fixed form, and can sometimes turn conduct that appears bad on the surface into a good outcome. Conversely, when something seems right at first but ultimately leads to error, this shows a failure to understand how to adapt. Those who lack this understanding may turn a good deed into a bad one.

Ritual propriety is an outward expression of inner sincerity, but it can also become a false display. When events unfold in haste and danger, ritual may sometimes be of no use. Therefore, sages follow ritual forms in their dealings with others, but handle specific matters according to the actual circumstances, without binding themselves to a single fixed method. In this way, they do less harm and accomplish more; their commands can be carried out, and few in the world can find fault with them.

猩猩知往而不知来,猩猩,北方兽名,人面兽身,黄色。礼记曰,猩猩能言,不离走兽。见人往走,则知人姓字。此知往也。又嗜酒,人以酒搏之,饮而不能息,不知当醉,猩猩,北方兽名,人面兽身,黄色。礼记曰,猩猩能言,不离走兽。见人往走,则知人姓字。此知往也。又嗜酒,人以酒搏之,饮而不能息,不知当醉,以擒其身,故曰不能知来也。乾鹄知来而不知往,乾鹄,鹊也,人将有来事忧喜之征,则鸣,此知来也。知岁多风,多巢於木枝,人皆探其卵,故曰不知往也。乾,读乾燥之乾。鹄读告退之告。此修短之分也。昔者苌弘,周室之执数者也,苌弘,周景王之大夫也。数,历术。天地之气,日月之行,风两之变,律历之数,无所不通,然而不能自知,车裂而死。晋范、中行氏之难,以畔其君也。周刘氏与晋范氏世为夫也。数,历术。天地之气,日月之行,风两之变,律历之数,无所不通,然而不能自知,车裂而死。晋范、中行氏之难,以畔其君也。周刘氏与晋范氏世为婚姻,苌弘事刘文公,故周人助范氏。至敬王二十八年,晋人让周,周为杀苌弘以释之,故曰而不能自知,车裂而死也。苏秦,匹夫徒步之人也,靻矫嬴盖,经营万乘之主,服诺诸侯,然不自免於车裂之患。苏秦,洛阳人也。嬴,嬴囊也。盖,步盖也。苏秦相赵,赵封之为武安君。初带籯囊,襜步盖,历说万乘之君,,嬴囊也。盖,步盖也。苏秦相赵,赵封之为武安君。初带籯囊,襜步盖,历说万乘之君,合东山之从,利病之势,无所不下,使诸侯服从,无有不服诺者。故曰服诺诸侯,不自免於车裂之患。说在诠言之篇。
Interpretation

The ape knows that people are coming, but does not know what it is about to face. The ape is a beast from the north, with a human face, an animal’s body, and yellowish fur. The Book of Rites says that although apes can speak, they still belong among the beasts. When they see people approaching, they can recognize their names; this is what it means to know “who is coming.” Apes also love to drink, so people use wine to lure and capture them. They drink without being able to stop and do not know they are about to become drunk; then people seize them. Thus, they know that people are coming but do not know what will happen to them.

The qianghu (a legendary bird said to foretell events) knows that something is about to happen, but does not know that it has already passed. When someone is about to arrive or an event is about to occur, it cries out to foretell good or ill; this is what it means to know “what is coming.” It also knows which years will be windy and builds its nest on tree branches. People then find and take its eggs, so it is said not to know the misfortune that follows. Qiang is pronounced like the gan in “dry,” and hu like the gao in “farewell.” This illustrates that the length of each life is fixed by destiny.

In ancient times, Chang Hong was an expert in calendrical calculations in the Zhou royal court. He was a minister to King Jing of Zhou; here, “calculation” refers to the calendar. He was skilled in calculating the qi of Heaven and Earth, the movements of the sun and moon, changes in wind and rain, and the calendar and musical pitch standards. Yet he could not foresee his own fate, and in the end he was torn apart by chariots. At the time, the Fan and Zhonghang clans of Jin had rebelled against the ruler of Jin. The Liu clan of the Zhou royal house had intermarried with the Fan clan for generations, and Chang Hong served Liu Wen Gong, so the people of Zhou aided the Fan clan. In the twenty-eighth year of King Jing of Zhou, the people of Jin reproached the Zhou royal house, which then killed Chang Hong to settle the matter. Thus, although he was skilled in calculation, he did not know that he would be torn apart by chariots.

Su Qin was merely a commoner who traveled on foot to persuade rulers. Carrying his luggage and a traveling umbrella, he went from state to state, persuading powerful rulers and winning the princes over to his proposals, yet he could not escape the calamity of being torn apart by chariots. Su Qin was from Luoyang and once served as chancellor of Zhao, which enfeoffed him as Lord of Wu’an. At first, carrying his luggage and using a traveling umbrella, he visited the rulers of powerful states one by one, bringing the princes together in an alliance and weighing the advantages and disadvantages until they all accepted his arguments. Even so, he could not avoid the calamity of being torn apart by chariots. A related discussion appears in the “Quan Yan” chapter.

淮南鸿烈解卷之十九竟 1『无』,『民』字之误,据集解本改。 2『共』,『其』字之误,据集解本改。 3『伐』,『侯』字之误,据集解本改。 4『不』,『微』字之误,据集解本改。 5『往』,『柱』字之误,据集解本改。 6『别』,『刺』字之误,据集解本改。 7『发』,『接』字之误,据集解本改。 8『四』,『西』字之误,据集解本改。 9『其』,『』字之误,据集解本改。 7『发』,『接』字之误,据集解本改。 8『四』,『西』字之误,据集解本改。 9『其』,『北』字之误,据集解本改。 10『徘』,『供』字之误,据集解本改。 11『之』,『一』字之误,据集解本改。 12『伐』,『灭』字之误,据集解本改。 13『厥』,『目』字之误,据集解本改。 14『合』,『令』字之误,据集解本改。 21-淮南鸿烈解卷之二十 淮南鸿烈解卷之二十 太尉祭酒臣许慎记上 泛论训下
Interpretation

End of Volume Nineteen of Huainan Honglie Jie.

The following collation notes record corrections to the wording in different editions: in the first instance, “wu” should be “min”; in the second, “gong” should be “qi”; in the third, “fa” should be “hou”; in the fourth, “bu” should be “wei”; in the fifth, “wang” should be “zhu”; in the sixth, “bie” should be “ci”; in the seventh, “fa” should be “jie”; in the eighth, “si” should be “xi”; in the ninth, “qi” should be “bei”; in the tenth, “pai” should be “gong”; in the eleventh, “zhi” should be “yi”; in the twelfth, “fa” should be “mie”; in the thirteenth, “jue” should be “mu”; and in the fourteenth, “he” should be “ling.” All these corrections are based on the Jijie edition.

Chapter Twenty-One: Volume Twenty of Huainan Honglie Jie.

Volume Twenty of Huainan Honglie Jie.

Recorded by Xu Shen, Libationer to the Grand Commandant.

“Treatise on General Discussion,” Part Two.

徐偃王被服慈惠,身行仁义,陆地之朝者三十二国,然而身死国亡,子孙无类。偃王於衰乱之世,修行仁义,不设武备,楚王灭之,故身死国亡也。七谏篇曰,荆文误而徐亡是也。大夫种辅翼越王句践,而为之报怨雪耻,擒夫差之身,开地数千里,然而身伏属镂而死。句践奋计,报怨於也。大夫种辅翼越王句践,而为之报怨雪耻,擒夫差之身,开地数千里,然而身伏属镂而死。句践奋计,报怨於吴王夫差,获千里之地,而越王终已疑之,赐其属镂以死也。属镂,利剑也。一曰,长剑摽施鹿卢,锋曳地,属录而行之也。此皆达於治乱之机,机,要也。而未知全性之具者。故苌弘知天道而不知人事,苏秦知权谋而不知祸福,徐偃王知仁义而不知时,大夫种知忠而不知谋。不自知为身谋。圣人则不然,论世而为之事,权事而为之谋,是以舒之天下而不窕,内之寻常而不塞。不窕,在大能大也。八尺曰寻,倍寻曰常。在小能小,不塞急也。使天下荒乱,礼义绝,纲纪废,强弱相乘,力征相攘,臣主无差,贵贱无序,甲胃生蜡虱,乘,加也。攘,平除。生蜡曰寻,倍寻曰常。在小能小,不塞急也。使天下荒乱,礼义绝,纲纪废,强弱相乘,力征相攘,臣主无差,贵贱无序,甲胃生蜡虱,乘,加也。攘,平除。生蜡虱,不离体也。燕雀处帷幄,幄,幕也。处,犹巢也。而兵不休息,而乃始服属臾之貌,谨也。恭俭之礼,则必灭抑而不能兴矣。天下安宁,政教和平,百姓肃睦,上下相亲,而乃始立气矜,矜,自大也。奋勇力,则必不免於有司之法矣。是故圣人者,能阴能阳,能弱能强,随时而动静,因资而立功,物动而知其反,事萌而察其变,化则为之象,运则为之应,是以终身行而无所困。故事有可行而不可言者,有可(战)〔言〕1而不可行者,有易为而难成者,有难成而易败者。所谓可行而不可言者,趋舍也;可言而不可行者,伪诈也;易为而难成者,事也;难成而易败者,名也,此四策者,圣人之所独见而留意也。掘寸而伸尺,圣不可言者,趋舍也;可言而不可行者,伪诈也;易为而难成者,事也;难成而易败者,名也,此四策者,圣人之所独见而留意也。掘寸而伸尺,圣人为之;寸小,尺大。小枉而大直,君子行之。枉;曲也。直,直其道也。周公有杀弟之累,诛管蔡也。斋桓有争国之名,自莒先入,杀子纠也。然而周公以义补缺,谓翼成王以致太平,七年归政,北面为臣,故曰以义补缺也。桓公以功灭丑,立九合一匡之功,以灭争国之恶。而皆为贤。今以人之小过揜其大美,则天下无圣王贤相矣。故目中有疵,不害於视,不可灼也;疵,赘。灼,燃。喉中有病,无害於息,不可凿也。凿,穿。河上之丘冢,不可胜数,犹之为易也。言河上本非丘垄之处,有易之地犹多,以大言之也,以谕万事多覆於少。水激兴波,高下也。言河上本非丘垄之处,有易之地犹多,以大言之也,以谕万事多覆於少。水激兴波,高下相临,差以寻常,犹之为平。虽有激波,犹以为平,平者多也。犹橘柚冬生,人曰冬死,〔死〕2者众也,荠麦夏死,人曰夏生,〔生〕3者多也。昔者曹子为鲁将兵,三战不胜,亡地千里。使曹子计不顾后,足不旋踵,刎刭於陈中,则终身为破军擒将矣。然而曹子不羞其败,耻死而无功。柯之盟,榆三尺之刃,造桓公之胸,三战所亡,一朝而反之,勇闻于天下,功立於鲁国。复汶阳之田也。管仲辅公子纠而不能遂,遂,成。不可谓智;遁逃奔走,不死其难,不死子纠之难也。不可谓勇于天下,功立於鲁国。复汶阳之田也。管仲辅公子纠而不能遂,遂,成。不可谓智;遁逃奔走,不死其难,不死子纠之难也。不可谓勇;束缚桎梏,不讳其耻,不可谓贞。当此三行者,布衣弗友,人君弗臣。布衣之士不以为益友也,人君不以为义臣也。然而管仲兔於累绁之中,立齐国之政,九合诸侯,一匡天下。使管仲出死损躯,不顾后图,岂有此霸功哉。今人君论其臣也,不计其大功,总其略行,而求小善,则失贤之数也。略,大也。小善,忠也。数,术也。故人有厚德,无问其小节;而有大誉,无疵其小故。
Interpretation

King Yan of Xu treated people with kindness and generosity, and personally put benevolence and righteousness into practice. Thirty-two feudal states came to pay him court. Yet he died, his state was destroyed, and his descendants were slaughtered. King Yan lived in a time of decline and turmoil. He spoke only of benevolence and righteousness and made no preparations for defense, so the King of Chu destroyed him. The line in the Seven Admonitions that says, “The mistakes of Jing led to the destruction of Xu,” refers to this event.

The minister Wen Zhong assisted King Goujian of Yue and helped him avenge his humiliation, capture King Fuchai of Wu, and expand his territory by thousands of li. Yet in the end, Wen Zhong died beneath the sword called Shulou, the sharp sword the King of Yue had given him. Goujian had steeled himself to plan revenge on King Fuchai, winning a thousand li of territory, but eventually grew suspicious of Wen Zhong and gave him a sword with which to take his own life. Shulou was a sharp sword. Another account says it was a long sword with a ring on its hilt and a blade that dragged along the ground as its bearer walked.

These men all understood the crucial shifts between order and disorder, but did not know how to preserve themselves. Chang Hong understood the Way of Heaven but not human affairs; Su Qin understood political strategy but not fortune and misfortune; King Yan of Xu understood benevolence and righteousness but not the times; Wen Zhong understood loyalty but did not know how to look after his own interests.

Sages are different. They observe the condition of the age before deciding what to do, and devise their methods according to the circumstances. Their methods are not too narrow to meet the demands of great affairs, nor too cumbersome to handle ordinary matters. Here, “xun” means eight chi and “chang” means two xun; together, the terms stand for different scales, large and small. A sage can manage great affairs and handle small ones as well.

When the realm is in chaos, ritual and righteousness have fallen away, laws and order have collapsed, the strong oppress the weak, and rival powers fight for control by force, the distinctions between ruler and minister become confused and the ranks between high and low lose their order. Lice breed in the armor, and people live in military tents as swallows and sparrows build their nests, yet the fighting does not cease. In such times, anyone who begins by insisting on the rituals of humility and frugality will be suppressed, and those practices will be difficult to put into effect. When the realm is peaceful, government and instruction are harmonious, the people live in accord, and those above and below are close to one another, anyone who begins by acting domineering and proud and showing off his courage will inevitably break the laws of the authorities.

A sage, then, can be firm or yielding, weak or strong. He acts or keeps still as the times require, and establishes his achievements in keeping with the circumstances. When things begin to change, he can see the direction of the change; when an event first shows signs of taking shape, he can discern the turning point within it. As conditions shift, he responds in kind; as opportunity unfolds, he acts appropriately. Thus, nothing he does in the course of his life leaves him trapped in difficulty.

Some things can be done but are not suited to being spoken of; some can be spoken of but cannot truly be carried out; some are easy to begin but hard to bring to success; and some are difficult to accomplish but easy to ruin. What can be done but is inconvenient to speak of is a matter of advancing, withdrawing, and choosing what to accept or relinquish. What can be spoken of but cannot be put into practice is hypocrisy and deceit. What is easy to do but hard to bring to success consists of practical affairs. What is difficult to accomplish but easy to ruin is reputation. Only sages can see through these four situations and take them into account.

Sometimes, to extend an inch, one must first bend a little. A sage will do this. A small yielding that makes room for great integrity is also something a gentleman will accept. The Duke of Zhou once acquired a reputation for wrongdoing by executing his younger brothers, Guan Shu and Cai Shu. Duke Huan of Qi was also stained with infamy for contending for the throne: he returned to Qi ahead of his rival from Ju and killed Prince Jiu. But the Duke of Zhou later made amends through public service, assisting King Cheng and bringing peace to the realm. After seven years, he handed power back and himself took the position of a subject facing north. Duke Huan, for his part, erased his bad name through his achievements: he convened the feudal lords nine times and brought order to the realm. Both men were therefore regarded as worthy. If a person’s great achievements were obscured simply because of a small fault, the world would have no more enlightened rulers or able ministers.

A small blemish in the eye that does not interfere with sight is no reason to burn the eye in order to remove it. A minor ailment in the throat that does not obstruct breathing is no reason to pierce the throat in order to cure it. Along a river there are countless mounds, yet most of the land is still level. A rushing current forms waves, with peaks and troughs side by side; even when they differ by several zhang, the water as a whole may still be called level, because calm water covers the greater part. When tangerines and pomelos bear fruit in winter, people say they will wither in winter, because more trees wither then. When shepherd’s purse and wheat wither in summer, people say they grow in summer, because more plants grow then. These examples all show that the whole should not be judged from a few isolated cases.

In the past, Cao Gui, a general of Lu, led an army into battle three times, lost each time, and gave up a thousand li of territory. Had he given no thought to what should follow and, without even turning back, killed himself on the battlefield, he would have remained for the rest of his life merely a defeated general captured by the enemy. But he was not ashamed of defeat; instead, he was ashamed to die without having achieved anything. Later, at the meeting in Ke, he held a three chi dagger and confronted Duke Huan of Qi at close range, forcing Qi to return the territory Lu had lost in the three battles. His courage became known throughout the realm, and he won merit for Lu.

Guan Zhong assisted Prince Jiu but failed to help him succeed, so he could not be called wise. He fled into exile and did not die for Prince Jiu, so he could not be called brave. He was bound and imprisoned, yet was not ashamed of suffering humiliation, so he could not be called upright. Judged by these three points, ordinary people would not consider him a beneficial friend, and a ruler would not regard him as a loyal and righteous minister. Yet after escaping imprisonment, Guan Zhong took charge of Qi’s affairs, convened the feudal lords nine times, and brought order to the realm. If Guan Zhong had died for Prince Jiu at the time, without considering what might be accomplished afterward, how could Qi ever have achieved such supremacy?

When rulers assess their ministers today, if they ignore their great achievements and overall conduct and instead judge them by picking out only small acts of goodness, they will overlook worthy people. Therefore, do not pursue the minor faults of those whose virtue is profound, and do not tarnish the reputation of those held in high esteem over a small mistake.

夫牛蹄之涔不能生鳣鲔,涔,雨水也,满牛蹄迹中,言其小也,故不能生鳣鲔也。鳣,大鱼,长丈余,细鳞,黄首,白身,短头,口在腹下。鲔,大鱼,亦长丈余,仲春二月从河西上,得过龙门,便为,言其小也,故不能生鳣鲔也。鳣,大鱼,长丈余,细鳞,黄首,白身,短头,口在腹下。鲔,大鱼,亦长丈余,仲春二月从河西上,得过龙门,便为龙。先师说云也。而蜂房不容鹄卵,房,巢。小形不足以包大体也。夫人之情,莫不有所短,诚其大略是也,虽有小过,不足以为累。诚其实,略其行。若其大略非也,虽有闾里之行,未足大举。举,用。夫颜喙聚,梁父之大盗也,梁父,齐邑。今属太山。而为齐忠臣。段干木,晋国之大驵也,而为文侯师。驵,骄怚。一曰,驵,市侩也。言魏国之大侩也。孟卯妻其嫂,有五子焉,然而相魏,宁其危,解其患。孟卯,一齐人也。及为魏,能安其危国,类其勋也。战国策曰芒卯也。景阳淫酒,被发而御於妇人,威服诸侯。景阳楚将。此四人者,皆有所短,然而功名不灭者,其略得也。略,犹道也。季襄、陈诸侯。景阳楚将。此四人者,皆有所短,然而功名不灭者,其略得也。略,犹道也。季襄、陈仲子立节抗行,不入洿君之朝,不食乱世之食,遂饿而死。季襄,鲁人,孔子弟子。陈仲子,齐人,孟子弟子,居於陵也。不能存亡接绝者何?小节伸而大略屈。伸,用。屈,废。故小谨者无成功,訾行者不容於众,好揜人之善,扬人之短,訾毁人行,自独卑藏,众人所疾而不容之也。一说,訾,毁也。行有毁缺者,不为众人所容。体大者节疏,跖距者举远。疏,长也。跖,足也。人行,自独卑藏,众人所疾而不容之也。一说,訾,毁也。行有毁缺者,不为众人所容。体大者节疏,跖距者举远。疏,长也。跖,足也。距,大也。自古及今,五帝三王,未有能全其行者也。〔故〕4易曰,小过亨,利贞。言人莫不有过,而不欲其大也。夫尧、舜、汤、武,世主之隆也;隆,盛。齐桓晋文,五霸之豪英也。然尧有不慈之名,谓天下不以予子丹朱也。舜有卑父之谤,谓瞽叟降在庶人也。汤武有放弒之事,殷汤放桀南巢,周武弒纣宣室也。然尧有不慈之名,谓天下不以予子丹朱也。舜有卑父之谤,谓瞽叟降在庶人也。汤武有放弒之事,殷汤放桀南巢,周武弒纣宣室也。五伯有暴乱之谋。齐桓、晋文、宋襄、楚庄、秦穆,德末能纯,皆有争夺之验,故曰有暴乱之谋也。是故君子不责备於一人,方正而不以割,廉直而不以切,博通而不以訾,文武而不以责。文武以备具,不责备於人。求於一人则任以人力,任其力所能任也。自修则以道德。责人以人力,易偿也;自修以道德,难为也。难为则行高矣人。求於一人则任以人力,任其力所能任也。自修则以道德。责人以人力,易偿也;自修以道德,难为也。难为则行高矣,易偿则求赡矣。夫夏后氏之璜不能无考,半圭曰章,夏后氏之珍玉也。考,瑕衅也。明月之珠不能无类,夜光之珠,有似月光,故曰明月。颜,盘,若丝之结颣也。然而天下宝之者,何也?其小恶不足妨大美也。今志人之所短,而志人之所修,而求得其贤乎天下,则难矣。夫百里奚之饭牛,伊尹之负鼎,伊尹负鼎俎,调五味,以干汤,卒为贤相。太公之鼓刀,太公,河内汲人。有屠、钩之困,卒矣。夫百里奚之饭牛,伊尹之负鼎,伊尹负鼎俎,调五味,以干汤,卒为贤相。太公之鼓刀,太公,河内汲人。有屠、钩之困,卒为文王佐,翼武王伐纣也。宁戚之商歌,宁戚,卫人也,商旅於齐,宿郭门外,疾世商歌,以干桓公。〔桓公〕5夜出迎客,闻之举以为大田。(其歌曲)[事〕6在道应(说)〔训〕7也。其美有存焉者矣。众人见其位之卑贱,事之洿辱,而不知其大略,以为不肖。及其为天子三公,而立为诸侯贤相,乃始信於异众也。信,知。夫发于鼎俎之间,伊尹。出于屠酤之肆,肆,列也。谓太公吕尚也。解于累绁之中,累绁,所以束缚人,谓管仲。兴于牛颔之下,兴,起也。谓百里奚也。颔,读合索之合。洗之以汤沐,祓之以爟火,立之于本朝之上,倚之于三公之位,爟火,取火於日之官也。周礼司爟掌行火之正令。火,所以祓除祥也。立,置也。本朝,国之于三公之位,爟火,取火於日之官也。周礼司爟掌行火之正令。火,所以祓除祥也。立,置也。本朝,国朝也。内不惭於国家,外不愧於诸侯,符势有以内合。内合於君。故未有功而知其贤者,尧之知舜;功成事立而知其贤者,市人之知舜也。为是释度数而求之於朝肆草莽之中,其失人也必多矣。为上自任耳目聪明以得贤人之故,不复用度量之术取人,而亟求贤於朝肆之列,草莽之中,失贤人必多矣,何言求贤。何则?能效其求,而不知其所以取人也。
Interpretation

A little standing water in a hoofprint cannot sustain large fish such as sturgeon and tuna; a beehive cannot hold a swan’s egg. A small container cannot accommodate something immense.

No one’s conduct is entirely without shortcomings. If a person’s fundamental principles and overall direction are sound, minor faults should not be allowed to erase that fact. But if someone’s basic direction is wrong, behaving properly in everyday matters is not enough to qualify them as a worthy person.

Yan Huiju was once a notorious bandit in the Liangfu region, yet later became a loyal minister of Qi. Duan Ganmu had been a wealthy merchant in Jin, but later became a tutor to Marquis Wen of Wei. Meng Mao married his sister-in-law and had five children with her, yet he was able to serve Wei, stabilize crises, and avert calamities. Jing Yang drank excessively and behaved without restraint, but his authority was enough to make the feudal lords submit in fear. All these men had shortcomings, but the direction of their lives and the achievements they established kept their reputations from being eclipsed by minor faults.

Ji Xiang and Chen Zhongzi, by contrast, clung to their principles of honor. They refused to serve corrupt rulers or accept stipends in a disordered age, and eventually starved to death. Why could they not save the country from crisis and prolong a failing enterprise? Because in upholding minor principles, they obstructed matters of greater importance. Those who fixate on details find it difficult to accomplish anything. People who delight in exposing and slandering others, publicizing their faults while concealing their strengths, also earn the resentment of everyone around them. Tall people take longer strides and can cover more ground; throughout history, not even the Five Emperors and Three Kings were entirely free of flaws in their conduct.

The Book of Changes says, “Small Excess brings success; constancy is beneficial.” This means that people are bound to make mistakes, but they should not commit grave ones. Yao, Shun, Tang of Shang, and King Wu of Zhou were rulers of prosperous ages; Duke Huan of Qi, Duke Wen of Jin, and the other Five Hegemons were also outstanding figures. Yet they still drew criticism. Some said Yao was unkind because he did not pass the realm to his son Danzhu; others said Shun showed contempt for his father because Gusou later fell into poverty. Tang banished Jie of Xia, and King Wu killed Zhou of Shang: both acts involved a ruler’s expulsion or death. The Five Hegemons, too, had histories of contending for power, and their virtue was not unblemished.

A noble person, therefore, does not demand perfection from others. When holding others to account, one should consider only what they are actually capable of doing; when holding oneself to account, one should strive toward moral standards. Asking others to do what lies within their abilities is easy; cultivating virtue in oneself is much harder. The harder something is to achieve, the more it reveals the nobility of one’s character. For what is easy to do, one may reasonably set more comprehensive expectations.

The precious jade of the Xia dynasty had flaws, and the Bright Moon Pearl bore patterns like knotted threads. Yet the world still regarded them as treasures, because minor blemishes did not diminish their great beauty. If we focus only on other people’s faults and ignore their strengths, it will be difficult to find worthy people anywhere in the world.

Baili Xi once tended cattle for another man. Yi Yin once carried pots and prepared food. Jiang Taigong once made his living as a butcher, and Ning Qi once sang outside an inn in hopes of finding service. People saw only their low status and humbling circumstances. Unable to recognize their abilities and aspirations, they assumed these men were unworthy. Only after they became worthy ministers and assisted their rulers did people believe in their abilities.

Yi Yin was discovered in the kitchen; Jiang Taigong emerged from the butcher’s market; Guan Zhong was released from confinement; and Baili Xi rose from a life spent tending cattle for another man. They were treated with respect and appointed to office, entering the court and attaining high rank. Their consciences were clear before their country, and they felt no shame in facing the feudal lords. This shows that their abilities matched the positions they held. Before Shun had accomplished anything, Yao already recognized his worth; only after Shun’s achievements were complete did ordinary people see it too. If we search for people only in courts, marketplaces, and villages, without understanding the standards by which they should be chosen, we are bound to miss many talented people. What matters is knowing how to recognize people, not merely where to look for them.

夫物之相类者,世主之所乱惑也;嫌疑肖象者,众人之所眩耀。(床似象)〔肖象,似〕8也嫌疑,谓白骨之肖象牙也,碧卢似玉,蛇床似麋芜也。所乱惑也;嫌疑肖象者,众人之所眩耀。(床似象)〔肖象,似〕8也嫌疑,谓白骨之肖象牙也,碧卢似玉,蛇床似麋芜也。故狠者类知而非知,狠者自用,像有知,非真知。愚者类仁而非仁,愚者不能断割,有似於仁,非真仁也。戆者类勇而非勇,戆者,不知畏危难,有似於勇,非真勇。使人之相去也,若玉之与石,美之与恶,则论人易矣。夫乱人者,芎藭之与稿本也、蛇床之与麋芜也,此皆相似。言其相类,但其芳臭不同,犹小人类君子,但其仁与不仁异也。故剑工或剑之似莫邪者,唯欧冶能名其种;欧冶,良工。玉工眩玉之似碧卢者,唯琦顿不失其情;碧卢,或云珷玞也。故剑工或剑之似莫邪者,唯欧冶能名其种;欧冶,良工。玉工眩玉之似碧卢者,唯琦顿不失其情;碧卢,或云珷玞。猗顿,鲁之富人,能知玉理,不失其情也。暗主乱于奸臣小人之疑君子者,唯圣人能见微以知明。故蛇举首尺,而修短可知也;象见其牙,而大小可论也。薜烛庸子,见若狐甲於剑而利钝识 矣;薜,齐邑也。烛庸氏子,通利剑。臾儿、易牙、淄、渑之。水合者,
Interpretation

When things resemble one another, rulers can easily mistake one for another; when appearances are alike and truth is hard to distinguish from falsehood, people can be dazzled and confused. For example, bone can look like ivory, green stone (a jade-like material) can look like jade, and snakebed herb can look like miwu (an aromatic plant). These things look alike, but in reality they are different.

A cruel and harsh person may seem perceptive, but has no true understanding; he merely assumes he is right. A dull-witted person may seem kind, but is not truly benevolent; he simply cannot make decisions. A reckless person may seem brave, but is not truly courageous; he simply does not know to fear danger. When the differences between people are as obvious as those between jade and stone, or beauty and ugliness, judging them is easy. What truly confounds us are things that resemble one another: xiongqiong and gaoben, snakebed herb and miwu. They look alike, but their fragrances differ. A petty person may also look like a gentleman; the difference lies only in whether he is truly benevolent and virtuous.

Thus, among swords there are some that resemble the famed sword Moye, and only Ou Ye, the ancient master swordsmith, could identify their kinds. Among stones, some resemble green jade-like stone, and only Qidun, a skilled judge of jade, could see what they truly were. A foolish ruler is easily misled by treacherous ministers and petty people who outwardly resemble gentlemen; only a sage can discern the truth from the slightest signs.

When a snake shows its head, one can judge its length from it; when an elephant shows its tusks, one can infer its size. Xue Zhu and Yongzi, experts in judging swords, needed only to see markings on a blade like a fox’s armor to tell whether it was sharp. Yu’er and Yi Ya, experts in discerning flavors, could taste the difference between the waters of the Zi and Mian rivers even when they were mixed together.

尝一

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 7 Vol. 9 →