中文 · EN

《南华真经新传》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書 Vol. 3 / 6 25,000 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南华真经新传》 Vol. 3 (Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書, 6 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 52 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南华真经新传》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

于大不终于小不遗故万物备广广乎其无不容也渊乎其不可测也形德仁义神之末也非至人孰能定之夫至人有世不亦大乎而不足以为之累天下奋柄而不与之偕审乎无假而不与利迁极物之真能守其本故外天地遗万物而神未尝有所困也通乎道合乎德退仁义宾礼乐至人之心有所定矣世之所贵道者书也书不过语语有贵也语之所贵者意也意有所随意之所随者不可以言传也
Interpretation

The Dao has no end in its vastness and leaves nothing out in its minuteness, so the myriad things are all complete within it. It is so expansive that nothing lies outside it, and so profound that it cannot be fathomed. Bodily form, De, benevolence, and righteousness are only the outer fringe of Shen; unless one is a perfected person, one cannot truly settle such matters. The perfected person may hold all under heaven, yet even that vast scope is not enough to weigh him down. When people under heaven scramble for power, he does not scramble with them. He sees clearly the state of not leaning on externals, does not shift with gain and loss, clarifies things’ true nature and keeps to the root—therefore he sets heaven and earth aside and forgets the myriad things, while his spirit never grows cramped. He penetrates the Dao and accords with De, puts benevolence and righteousness behind him and keeps ritual and music in a subordinate place, and his inner mind comes to rest.

People treat books as if they were the precious Dao itself, yet books are only words. Words matter because of meaning, and meaning in turn has something it follows—and what is followed cannot be put into words.

夫道无乎不在也虽天地之大由之而生蜩鴳之小由之而成故在于大则亦未尝不小在于小而亦未尝不大当在其大也则不可知其极故曰于大不终当在其小则不见不足故曰于小不遗大不知其极小不见其不足万物之用无不备也故曰万物广备然万物之既而亦未尝不大当在其大也则不可知其极故曰于大不终当在其小则不见不足故曰于小不遗大不知其极小不见其不足万物之用无不备也故曰万物广备然万物之既备而无不涵容也故曰广乎其无不容也容于万物而其深无涯矣故曰渊乎其不可测也道之如此而非至人孰能体用矣故至人之体道天下虽广而不以累心也故曰有世不亦大乎而不足以为之累权谋用而不与之偕也故曰天下奋柄而不与之偕明物傥来而不为之役也故曰审乎无假而不与利迁辩是与非而不失性也故曰极物之真能守其本至人如此而天地谋用而不与之偕也故曰天下奋柄而不与之偕明物傥来而不为之役也故曰审乎无假而不与利迁辩是与非而不失性也故曰极物之真能守其本至人如此而天地不足拘万物不足累性命安全而泛然逍遥故曰外天地遗万物而神未尝有所困也远乎无为明乎自得抑乎仁义外乎礼乐真君渊静而不动也故曰退道德宾礼乐至人之心有所定矣
Interpretation

The Dao is present everywhere. Heaven and Earth, vast as they are, arise from the Dao; the cicada and the sparrow, tiny as they are, are also brought to completion through the Dao’s growth. Thus whether the Dao appears in what is great, it never fails to reach into what is small; whether it appears in what is small, it is never less than fully expansive. When it shows itself as great, no end can be seen—hence the saying “in the great, it never comes to an end”; when it shows itself as small, no lack can be seen—hence “in the small, nothing is left out.” Great without knowing a limit, small without showing insufficiency—the functional completeness of the ten thousand things is fully present, hence “the ten thousand things are broadly complete.” Once the ten thousand things are complete, nothing lies outside inclusion, hence “how vast—nothing it cannot contain”; able to hold the ten thousand things yet bottomless in depth, hence “how deep—nothing by which it can be fathomed.” Such is the Dao. Unless one is a Supreme Person—someone whose cultivation has reached the utmost—who can discern and put it into practice?

The Supreme Person embodies the Great Dao: though the world is vast, he is not burdened by it—hence “having a world—is that not vast? Yet it is not enough to become a burden to him.” When people in the world wield schemes and struggle for power, he does not go along with them—hence “when all under Heaven wrestle for the handle of authority, he does not join them.” He understands that external things arrive only by chance, and therefore is not enslaved by them—hence “he discerns that there is nothing to borrow or pretend, and does not shift with profit.” He distinguishes right and wrong without losing his true nature—hence “he penetrates the genuineness of things and can guard their root.” In this way, Heaven and Earth are not enough to confine him, the ten thousand things are not enough to drag him down; life and nature (Xingming) are secure, and he is free and at ease—hence “he puts Heaven and Earth outside himself, leaves the ten thousand things behind, yet his spirit (Shen) is never trapped.” He withdraws from artificiality and returns to Wuwei (non-action); understanding comes of itself; he ranks benevolence and righteousness as secondary and sets ritual and music aside; the true lord within—the inner spiritual master—remains deeply still and does not act rashly—hence “he steps back from Daode (the Way and Virtue) and treats ritual and music as guests.” The heart of the Supreme Person thus finds its resting place.

而世因贵言传书世虽贵之哉犹不足贵也为其贵非其贵也故视而可见者形与色也听而可闻者名与声也悲夫世人以形色名声为足以得彼之情夫形色名声果不足以得彼之情则知者不言言者不知而世岂识之哉桓公读书于堂上轮扁斫轮于堂下释椎凿而上问桓公曰敢问公之所读者何言邪公曰圣人之言也曰圣人在乎公曰已死矣曰然则君之所读者古人知而世岂识之哉桓公读书于堂上轮扁斫轮于堂下释椎凿而上问桓公曰敢问公之所读者何言邪公曰圣人之言也曰圣人在乎公曰已死矣曰然则君之所读者古人之糟粕已夫桓公曰寡人读书轮人安得议乎有说则可无说则死轮扁曰臣也以臣之事观之斫轮徐则甘而不固疾则苦而不入不徐不疾得之于手而应于心口不能言有数存焉于其间臣不能以喻臣之子臣之子亦不能受之于臣是以行年七十而老斫轮古之人与其不可传也死矣然则君之所读者古人之糟粕已夫 夫道视之不见也听之不闻也搏之不得也不可以智度不可以情求妙而至妙神而至神糟粕已夫
Interpretation

People value language, so they pass books down through the generations. Yet even though they treasure these books, they still do not grasp what is truly precious, because what they prize is not the truly precious thing itself. What the eye sees is only shape and color; what the ear hears is only names and sounds. How lamentable! People imagine that shape, color, names, and sounds are enough to capture the real state of things. When shape, color, names, and sounds are insufficient to grasp the real, those who truly know often do not speak, while those who talk endlessly often do not know—and how could ordinary people see this?

Duke Huan of Qi was reading in the hall while Wheelwright Pian (a wheelwright named Pian) was below, hewing a wheel (chopping wood to make a wheel). He set down mallet and chisel and came up to ask: “May I ask what words my lord is reading?” The duke said: “The words of sages.” The wheelwright asked: “Are the sages still alive?” The duke said: “They are long dead.” The wheelwright said: “Then what my lord reads is nothing but the dregs of the ancients (the lees left after brewing wine—a metaphor for the coarse residue in words and books).” The duke said: “I am engaged in reading, and you—a wheelwright—dare to comment! If you can give a reason, fine; if not, you die.” The wheelwright said: “I speak from my own craft. When I pare a wheel, if the stroke is too slow the wood slips and the wheel is not firm; if too fast, it binds and the tenon will not fit. Neither slow nor fast—when hand and measure are just right, the heart responds naturally, yet the mouth cannot put it into words; there is a knack and measure in between. I cannot explain this skill clearly enough to pass it to my son, and my son cannot receive it from me—so at seventy I am still hewing wheels in my old age. The ancients died taking with them what could not be put into words; then what my lord reads is nothing but the dregs of the ancients.”

The Dao (the Way)—look and you do not see it, listen and you do not hear it, touch and you do not grasp it. It cannot be fathomed by cleverness, nor sought by intent. It is subtle to the utmost, marvelous to the utmost. What can be spoken or written down is only dregs.

夫道视之不见也听之不闻也搏之不得也不可以智度不可以情求妙而至妙神而至神惟圣人心得而知之矣圣人心得而知之也以道神妙深微而广后世不能知之矣故载道之粗于其书书所以为道之粗迹也桓公不能心得于至道徒读圣人之粗迹宜乎轮扁之所以讥也然轮扁虽讥于桓公至于己之所轮而其术虽为得于心亦未为无失而已矣夫破百年之木而揉之以为轮是使木失真性也安若不斫于轮乎二者均为有为之累故庄子言于此篇终 南华真经新传卷六 钦定四库全书 南华真经新传卷七 宋 王雱 撰 天运篇 夫无为者天之妙道也天道之止于无为则其道所以不真经新传卷七 宋 王雱 撰 天运篇 夫无为者天之妙道也天道之止于无为则其道所以不为神惟能无为而为之然后道妙而神矣庄子因而作天运篇 天其运乎地其处乎日月其争于所乎孰主张是孰纲维是孰居无事推而行是意者其有机缄而不得已邪意者其运转而不能自止邪云者为雨乎雨者为云乎孰隆施是孰居无事滛乐而劝是风起北方一西一东有上彷徨孰嘘吸是孰居无事而披拂是敢问何故巫咸祒曰来吾语女天有六极五常帝王顺之则治逆之则凶九洛之事治成德备监照下土天下戴之此谓上皇
Interpretation

The Dao cannot be seen, heard, or grasped; it cannot be measured by cleverness or pursued by emotion. It is so subtle and so wondrous that only the sage who comprehends it inwardly can know it. The reason the sage can intuit it is that the Dao is wondrous, profound, and vast—later generations cannot fully know it. All that can be done is to record its rougher, more outward aspects in books; writing is only the coarse trace the Dao leaves behind. Duke Huan could not awaken to the ultimate Dao in his heart and merely read the coarse traces the sages left; it was only natural that Wheelwright Pian mocked him. Yet though Pian mocked Huan, his own craft of wheel-making—though he said it came from the heart—was not without fault either: splitting a century-old tree, bending and shaping it into a wheel, makes the wood lose its native nature. How can that compare with never carving a wheel at all? Reading books and carving wheels alike are burdens brought on by deliberate effort. That is why Zhuangzi spoke these words at the end of this chapter.

Nanhua Zhenjing Xinzhuan, juan 6. Siku Quanshu (Imperially Commissioned Complete Library of the Four Treasuries). Nanhua Zhenjing Xinzhuan, juan 7, by Wang Bi of the Song, Tianyun (Heavenly Revolutions) chapter.

Wuwei is the subtle way of Heaven. If the way of Heaven stopped at Wuwei alone, that way could not be called divine. Only when one acts by way of Wuwei—acting without forcing—does the Dao become both subtle and divine. That is why Zhuangzi wrote the Tianyun chapter.

Does Heaven revolve? Does Earth rest still? Do sun and moon vie for their places? Who presides over this? Who maintains it? Who sits idle yet sets it in motion? Are they bound by some mechanism so they must behave thus, or do they turn on their own and cannot stop? Do clouds become rain, or rain become clouds? Who raises clouds and sends rain? Who sits idle, takes delight in this, and brings it about? Wind rises from the north, now west, now east, soaring aloft and wheeling about—who breathes it in and out? Who sits idle and blows it? What is the reason for all this?

The shaman Xian said: Come, I will tell you. Heaven has six extremes and five constants; when emperors follow them, the realm is at peace; when they go against them, disaster follows. When the business of the Nine Luo is accomplished, virtue is complete, its radiance shines upon the land below, and all under Heaven look up to him—this is called the Supreme Sovereign.

夫日月云雨风气皆天之用也天有其用而不用以为用则其用所以不息也惟圣人法而用之以宥于天下故功所以不亏而道此谓上皇 夫日月云雨风气皆天之用也天有其用而不用以为用则其用所以不息也惟圣人法而用之以宥于天下故功所以不亏而道所以曲全幽远无不照知而民心推戴而存真也故曰帝王顺之则治逆之则凶九洛之事治成德备监照下土天下戴之此谓上皇
Interpretation

The sun and moon, clouds and rain, and wind and air are all the workings of Heaven. Heaven possesses these workings yet does not wield them with deliberate intent; only then do they never cease. The sage takes this as a model: by extending leniency throughout the realm—without tightening control and letting people live at ease—merit is not diminished, and the Great Dao is preserved through yielding (only by bending and yielding can one remain whole). Nothing in the farthest reaches escapes being known and illumined; the people’s hearts gather in support, and authentic nature is preserved. When the ruler aligns with this, there is stability; when he goes against it, there is danger. When the governance summed up in the Nine Categories of the Luoshu is fully accomplished, virtue is complete; shining upon the land below, the world gives its allegiance—this is what is meant by the Supreme Sovereign (Shanghuang).

商太宰荡问仁于庄子庄子曰虎狼仁也曰何谓也庄子曰父子相亲何谓不仁曰请问至仁庄子曰至仁无亲太宰曰荡闻之无亲则不爱不爱则不孝谓至仁不孝可乎庄子曰不然夫至仁尚已孝固不足以言之此非过孝之言也不及孝之言也夫南行者至于郢北面而不见冥山是何也则去之远也故曰以敬孝易以爱孝难以爱孝易而忘亲难忘亲易不及孝之言也夫南行者至于郢北面而不见冥山是何也则去之远也故曰以敬孝易以爱孝难以爱孝易而忘亲难忘亲易使亲忘我难使亲忘我易兼忘天下难兼忘天下易使天下兼忘我难至仁者未及于大仁止于不亲而已矣故曰至仁不亲不亲则亲之视我岂有乎故曰使亲忘我易亲之忘我则我止曰无心于亲矣岂谓无心于天下乎故兼忘天下难天下者度外之一物耳我岂视之为有而累心之亦可忘之而已矣故曰兼忘天下易然天下虽为度外之一物而万物待我而赡足矣故曰使天下兼忘我难此至仁未为兼忘也惟大人任其自然而付之自为所以兼一物而万物待我而赡足矣故曰使天下兼忘我难此至仁未为兼忘也惟大人任其自然而付之自为所以兼忘而已矣兼忘则入于真空矣 夫德遗尧舜而不为也利泽施于万世天下莫知也岂直太息而言仁孝乎哉夫孝悌仁义忠信贞廉此皆自勉以役其德者也不足多也故曰至贵国爵并焉至富国财并焉至愿名誉并焉是以道不渝
Interpretation

In Song (descendants of the Shang, hence called “Shang” in the text), Grand Steward Dang asked Zhuangzi what benevolence (ren) is—love and care toward others. Zhuangzi said, “Even tigers and wolves have benevolence.” Dang asked, “How so?” Zhuangzi said, “They cherish one another as parent and child—how is that not benevolence?” Dang asked again, “What is the highest benevolence?” Zhuangzi said, “The highest benevolence is affection without partial closeness.” Dang said, “Without closeness there is no love; without love there is no filial piety. Can one say the highest benevolence is unfilial?” Zhuangzi said, “No. The highest benevolence is so far above that filial piety cannot even describe it. That is not because filial piety goes too far, but because it falls short. It is like someone who has gone south as far as Ying and then faces north—they cannot see Ming Mountain in the north, simply because they are too far away. Ultimate benevolence stands equally far from filial piety. So it is said: to fulfill filial piety through reverence is easy; through genuine love, hard; through genuine love is easy, but to forget the pull of attachment to parents is hard; to forget that in oneself is easy, but to have parents forget their attachment to me is hard; to have parents forget is easy, but to forget the whole world together with that is hard; to forget the world in oneself is easy, but to have the world forget me is hard.”

Here, ultimate benevolence has not yet reached great benevolence; it stops at impartiality, so we say ultimate benevolence is “without partial closeness.” Since there is no partial closeness, how could parents still be attached to me? Therefore having parents forget me is still the easier step. When parents forget me, that only means I no longer fix my heart on family ties—not that I am equally indifferent to the world—so forgetting the world as well is harder. The world is merely something outside one’s cares; why treat it as solid and let it burden the heart? One may simply forget it—hence forgetting the world is again the easier step. Yet the myriad things still depend on me for their sufficiency, so having the world forget me is hard. This level of ultimate benevolence still falls short of mutual forgetting, in which both sides release one another. Only the person of attainment lets nature take its course and returns affairs to the myriad things themselves—that is mutual forgetting. When mutual forgetting is reached, one enters the empty clarity where all grasping has fallen away.

Such virtue abandons even the deeds of Yao and Shun; its grace reaches ten thousand generations, yet the world never knows. Why sigh and talk empty talk of benevolence and filial piety? Filial piety, brotherly respect, benevolence, righteousness, loyalty, trustworthiness, integrity, and purity are all things people force upon themselves and drive their nature to perform—they are not worth exalting. Therefore the highest honor casts aside rank and title together; the greatest wealth casts aside the state’s goods together; the deepest satisfaction of heart casts aside reputation together. Thus the Dao does not change.

夫万物皆备于我而我能全之而不亏则至贵至富至愿所以并之焉其道安有加损矣故曰至贵国爵并焉至富国财并焉至愿名誉并焉是以道不渝 北门成问于黄帝曰帝张咸池之乐于洞庭之野吾始闻之惧复闻之怠卒闻之而惑荡荡默默乃不自得帝曰汝殆其然哉吾奏问于黄帝曰帝张咸池之乐于洞庭之野吾始闻之惧复闻之怠卒闻之而惑荡荡默默乃不自得帝曰汝殆其然哉吾奏之以人征之以天行之以礼义建之以太清夫至乐者先应之以人事顺之以天理行之以五德应之以自然然后调理四时太和万物四时迭起万物循生一盛一衰文武伦经一清一浊阴阳调和流光其声蛰虫始作吾惊之以雷霆其卒无尾其始无首一死一生一偾一起所常无穷而一不可待汝故惧也吾又奏之以阴阳之和烛之以日月之明其声能短能长能柔能刚变化齐一不主故常在谷满谷在坑满坑涂郄守神以物为量其声挥绰其名高明是故神守其幽日月星辰行其纪吾止之以有穷流之于无止子欲虑之而不能知也望之而不能见也逐之而不能及也傥然立于四虚之道倚于槁梧而吟目知穷乎所欲见力屈乎所欲逐吾既不及已夫形充空虚而不能知也望之而不能见也逐之而不能及也傥然立于四虚之道倚于槁梧而吟目知穷乎所欲见力屈乎所欲逐吾既不及已夫形充空虚乃至委蛇汝委蛇故怠吾又奏之以无怠之声调之以自然之命故若混逐丛生林乐而无形布挥而不曳幽昏而无声动于无方居于窈冥或谓之死或谓之生或谓之实或谓之荣行流散徙不主常声世疑之稽于圣人圣也者达于情而遂于命也天机不张而五官皆备此之谓天乐无言而心悦故有焱氏为之颂曰听之不闻其声视之不见其形充满天地苞裹六极汝欲听之而无接焉而故惑也乐也者始于惧惧故祟为之颂曰听之不闻其声视之不见其形充满天地苞裹六极汝欲听之而无接焉而故惑也乐也者始于惧惧故祟吾又次之以怠怠故遁卒之于惑惑故愚愚故道道可载而与之俱也夫天下至妙之道当其浑也天人阴阳万物纤悉无在焉及其散也天地设位阴阳殊气物自为物无不由之矣是以黄帝得之而所以全天乐故庄子所以寓言黄帝之张咸池也夫咸池者道浑之喻也奏之者道散之谓也道浑则所以有其体道散则所以有其用用则所以有为而有为而群生遂则其乐岂有其声欤宜乎焱氏为之颂而言其听之而不闻视之而不见也故视之而不见者言其无体也听之而不闻者言其无声也此明有为卒至于无为也夫无为则复命而反真故终曰愚故道道可载而与之俱也
Interpretation

All things are already complete within me. If I can fully preserve them without the slightest loss, then the highest honor, the highest wealth, and the highest aspiration are all contained therein—how could the Dao be increased or diminished? Therefore it is said: the highest honor is one with the rank of the state, the highest wealth is one with the state’s goods, and the highest aspiration is one with fame. Thus the Dao does not change.

Beimen Cheng asked Huang Di: “When you played the music of Xianchi on the plain of Dongting, at first I felt fear; hearing it again I felt weariness; when I heard it to the end I was instead bewildered—my spirit dazed, silent and speechless, unable to settle myself.” Huang Di said: “You are probably just like that. I perform according to human affairs, verify it with the way of Heaven, carry it out through ritual and righteousness, and establish it upon the utmost clarity (Taiqing).”

What is called supreme joy first accords with human affairs, follows Heaven’s principle, practices the five virtues, and responds to nature; then it harmonizes the four seasons and brings the ten thousand things into harmony. The four seasons rise in turn, the ten thousand things grow along with them; flourishing and decline each have their pattern in civil and martial order; clarity and turbidity, yin and yang in harmony, radiance flowing with the sound of music. Creatures in hibernation begin to stir—I startle them with thunder. This music has no tail when it ends and no head when it begins; now dying, now living, now falling, now rising—ordinary change without end, yet wholly unpredictable. So you were afraid.

Again I perform with the harmony of yin and yang and illuminate with the brightness of sun and moon. The music may be short or long, soft or hard; change is uniform yet does not cling to the old constant. Meeting a valley it fills the valley, meeting a hollow it fills the hollow; blocking gaps, holding fast to spirit, taking the ten thousand things themselves as the measure. The music spreads wide and easy, its name lofty and bright. Therefore ghosts and spirits keep to hidden depths, sun, moon, and stars move each in its order. I make it cease where there is an end, and again let it flow where there is no stopping. You wish to think of it yet cannot know it, look at it yet cannot see it, chase it yet cannot catch up. You stand blankly on the road of empty space on all sides, leaning on a withered paulownia to chant; eye and mind exhaust themselves on what you wish to see, strength exhausts itself on what you wish to pursue—you can no longer catch up. The body is full yet the heart is empty, and so you can only yield and turn with the flow. Because you relaxed and followed in this way, you were weary.

Again I perform with a tone that knows no weariness, regulated according to nature’s mandate. Then it is like mixing in pursuit, clustering and arising together—many sounds together yet no form seen; scattered and stirred yet not pulled, dim yet without sound; movement without fixed direction, dwelling in depth and hidden darkness. Some call it death, some call it life, some call it fruit, some call it flourishing—turning and dispersing, not holding to fixed sound. The world is puzzled and inquires of the sage. What is called sage is one who penetrates the real situation and accords with Heaven’s mandate. Heaven’s mechanism is not deliberately set up, yet the five senses are all complete—this is what is called music of Heaven (Tianle): without speaking, the heart is already joyful. Therefore the ancient emperor Yan had a eulogy that said: Listen—you cannot hear its sound; look—you cannot see its form; it fills Heaven and Earth and wraps the six directions. You wish to listen, yet there is nothing to receive it—so you are bewildered.

This music begins in fear; fear stirs the spirit. Next it turns to weariness; weariness makes the spirit retreat. Finally it reaches bewilderment; bewilderment returns to plain simplicity and foolishness. Only foolishness can unite with the Dao; the Dao can be borne and traveled with.

The most subtle Dao under Heaven—in its undivided wholeness, the fine distinctions of Heaven and human, yin and yang, and the ten thousand things are not yet within it. When it disperses, Heaven and Earth take their places, yin and yang qi differ, things each become what they are—nothing is not from it. Huang Di thereby completed the music of Heaven; Zhuangzi borrows Huang Di’s playing of Xianchi to lodge this meaning. Xianchi stands for the wholeness of the Dao; playing stands for the Dao’s dispersal. The Dao whole—therefore there is substance; the Dao dispersed—therefore there is function. With function comes action; with action the living beings each attain completion—what need has such music for sound? Hence Yan said it is heard yet not heard, seen yet not seen. Not seen means it has no form; not heard means it has no sound. This shows that action ultimately reaches wuwei (non-action). Wuwei can return to original destiny and revert to true nature—therefore it is finally said: only foolishness can unite with the Dao; the Dao can be borne and be one with it.

孔子西游于卫颜渊体也听之而不闻者言其无声也此明有为卒至于无为也夫无为则复命而反真故终曰愚故道道可载而与之俱也 孔子西游于卫颜渊问师金曰以夫子之行为奚如师金曰惜乎而夫子其穷哉颜渊曰何也师金曰夫刍狗之未陈也盛以箧衍巾以文绣尸祝斋戒以将之及其已陈也行者践其首苏者取而爨之而已将复取而盛以箧衍巾以文绣游居寝卧其下彼不得梦必且数眯焉今而夫子亦取先王已陈刍狗取弟子游居寝卧其下故伐树于宋削迹于卫穷于商周是非其梦邪围于陈蔡之间七日不火食死生相与邻是非其眯邪夫水行莫如用舟而陆行莫如用车以舟之可行于水也而求推之于陆则没世不行防常古今非水陆与周鲁非舟车与今蕲行周于鲁是犹推舟于陆夫水行莫如用舟而陆行莫如用车以舟之可行于水也而求推之于陆则没世不行防常古今非水陆与周鲁非舟车与今蕲行周于鲁是犹推舟于陆也劳而无功身必有殃彼未知夫无方之传应物而不穷者也且子独不见夫桔槔者乎引之则俯舍之则仰彼人之所引非引人也故俯仰而不得罪于人故夫三皇五帝之礼义法度不矜于同而矜于治故譬三皇五帝之礼义法度其犹柤梨橘柚邪其味相反而皆可于口故礼义法度者应时而变者也今取猨狙而衣以周公之服彼必龁啮挽裂尽去而后慊观古今之异犹猨狙之异乎周公也故西施病心而矉其里其里之丑人见而美之归亦捧心而矉其里其里之富人见之坚闭门而不出贫人见之挈妻子而去之走彼知美矉而不知矉之所以美惜乎而夫子其穷哉孔子行年五十有一而不闻道乃南之沛见老聃老聃曰子来乎吾闻子北方之贤者也子亦得道乎孔子曰未得矉之所以美惜乎而夫子其穷哉孔子行年五十有一而不闻道乃南之沛见老聃老聃曰子来乎吾闻子北方之贤者也子亦得道乎孔子曰未得也老子曰子恶乎求之哉曰吾求之于度数五年而未得也老子曰子又恶乎求之哉曰吾求之于阴阳十有二年而未得老子曰然使道而可献则人莫不献之于其君使道而可进则人莫不进之于其亲使道而可以告人则人莫不告其兄弟使道而可以与人则人莫不与其子孙然而不可者无他也中无主而不止外无正而不行由中出者不受于外圣人不出由外入者无主于中圣人不隐名公器也不可多取仁义先王之蘧庐也止可以一宿而不可以乆处觏而多责古之至人假道于仁托宿于义以游逍遥之墟食于苟简之田立于不贷之圃逍遥无为也苟简易养也不贷无出也古者谓是采真之游以富为是者不能让禄以显为是者不能古之至人假道于仁托宿于义以游逍遥之墟食于苟简之田立于不贷之圃逍遥无为也苟简易养也不贷无出也古者谓是采真之游以富为是者不能让禄以显为是者不能让名亲权者不能与人柄操之则栗舍之则悲而一无所鉴以窥其所不休者是天之戮民也怨恩取与谏教生杀八者正之器也唯循大变无所湮者为能用之故曰正者正也其心以为不然者天门弗开矣
Interpretation

When Confucius traveled west and passed through the state of Wei, he listened yet heard nothing—meaning that the Way is originally without sound. This shows that deliberate action in the end arrives at Wuwei (non-action). Through Wuwei one can return to one’s original destiny and revert to true nature; that is why, in the end, it is simply called “foolishness.” The Dao can be borne, and the person walks together with it.

Yan Hui asked Master Jin (a musician named Jin): “My teacher acts in this way—what do you make of it?” Master Jin said: “Alas, your teacher is going to be in dire straits.” Yan Hui asked: “Why?” Master Jin said: “Before the straw dog (a dog made of grass for sacrifice) is set out for offering, it is placed in a bamboo basket and covered with an embroidered cloth; the impersonator of the spirit and the invoker who leads the prayers must first fast, then respectfully present it. Once the rite is over, passersby tread on its head and back, and wood-gatherers pick it up to burn. If someone were again to put it in a basket, cover it with embroidered cloth, and sleep beside it while traveling or lodging, even if that person had no nightmares, he would surely be restless again and again. Your teacher is now taking the straw dog that the former kings have already used and leading his disciples to wander and lodge beside it—so in Song he had the tree cut down against him, in Wei his tracks were erased, and in the lands of Shang and Zhou he was worn down. Is this not that kind of dream? Besieged between Chen and Cai for seven days without being able to kindle a fire to cook—pressed up against death—is this not that kind of mental disturbance?”

On water, a boat is best; on land, a cart is best. A boat is made to move on water, yet if you push it on land, you will not get it to go in a lifetime. The difference between past and present is not like that between water and land? And the difference between Zhou and Lu is not like that between boat and cart? To try now to carry Zhou’s whole system into Lu and put it into practice is like pushing a boat on land—toil without effect, and one’s person is bound to meet harm. He does not understand that unfixed turning and change, adapting to things without end, is what it means to follow circumstances inexhaustibly.

Have you never seen a well sweep (a lever-style device for drawing water)? Pull it and it goes down; release it and it rises. It is pulled by a person; it does not pull the person. So whether it bows or lifts, it gets no blame from anyone. The ritual and law of the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors—what is valuable is not that they are identical, but that each can govern the world well. To compare them is like hawthorn, pear, orange, and pomelo: the flavors differ, yet all are pleasant to eat. Thus ritual and law must change with the times. If you catch a monkey and dress it in the Duke of Zhou’s robes, it will surely bite and tear them until it has ripped them all off and feels satisfied. The gap between past and present is like the gap between a monkey and the Duke of Zhou. When Xishi had heart pain and frowned, an ugly neighbor thought it beautiful, went home and pressed her hands to her chest and frowned too. A rich neighbor saw it, shut his door and would not come out; a poor neighbor saw it and fled with wife and children. She knew only that frowning looked good, not why frowning looked good. Alas, your teacher is going to be in dire straits.

When Confucius reached fifty-one and had still not heard the Great Dao, he went south to Pei to see Laozi. Laozi said: “You have come? I hear you are a worthy of the north—have you attained the Dao?” Confucius said: “Not yet.” Laozi asked: “From what did you seek it?” He answered: “I sought it in numbers and measures for five years and did not obtain it.” Laozi asked again: “From what else did you seek it?” He answered: “I sought it in Yin-Yang for twelve years and still did not obtain it.” Laozi said: “So it is. If the Dao could be presented, no one would fail to present it to his lord; if it could be offered upward, no one would fail to offer it to parents; if it could be told to others, no one would fail to tell brothers; if it could be passed on, no one would fail to pass it to sons and grandsons. Yet it cannot be done—and there is no other reason: without a master within, the Dao will not stay; without the right path without, the Dao cannot be practiced. What goes out from within, if the outside will not receive it, the sage does not bring it forth; what enters from without, if there is no master within to receive it, the sage does not store it away. Fame is a vessel shared by the multitude—it must not be taken in excess. Benevolence and righteousness are like the inns of former kings: one may lodge for a night, not long stay; shown too long, they draw many demands.

The utmost persons of old borrowed benevolence as a road, lodged in righteousness, wandered in places of carefree ease, took food from fields of simplicity, and stood in gardens where giving was unnecessary. Carefree ease is Wuwei; simplicity easily nurtures the body; not giving means nothing is expended. The ancients called this “travel of gathering the true”—travel that gathers what is authentic. Those who take wealth as right cannot decline salary; those who take prominence as right cannot decline reputation; those who crave power cannot hand power to others. Grasp it and they fear; let go and they grieve—with no mirror in the heart, they only spy on what never rests. Such people are punished by Heaven. Resentment and favor, seeking and giving, admonition and teaching, giving life and giving death—these eight are tools for setting things straight; only one who follows great change without blockage can wield them. Therefore it is said: what is called “correct” is to correct what is already correct by nature. One whose heart does not assent—Heaven’s gate will not open for him.

庄子之作篇中言黄帝之张乐次言孔子之西游是皆有为之事也故孔子西游而师金以其道而比刍狗不及黄帝之事而已故降一等而言之也然师金止知孔子之道如无用之刍狗而不知无用乃有用之以其道而比刍狗不及黄帝之事而已故降一等而言之也然师金止知孔子之道如无用之刍狗而不知无用乃有用之妙也夫黄帝之事然为有为而是皆有为之至也故有为之至则卒入于无为故继言孔子问道于老聃也夫道集于虚而虚者足容于道也虚则一而行无不通也故不虚则不集故曰内无主而不止不一则不通故曰外无正而不行夫集于内者必行于外所谓由中而出也由中出者岂为自外而受欤此圣人之所以固守也故曰由中出者不受于外圣人不出夫行于外者因集于内所谓由外而入也由外入者岂为不虚而集欤此圣人之所以必行也故曰由外入者无主于中圣人不隐此老聃言入道致出夫行于外者因集于内所谓由外而入也由外入者岂为不虚而集欤此圣人之所以必行也故曰由外入者无主于中圣人不隐此老聃言入道致用之终始也
Interpretation

In this chapter Zhuangzi first describes the Yellow Emperor (Huangdi) performing music, then Confucius traveling west—both are instances of deliberate, purposeful action (youwei). When he turns to Confucius’s western journey, the music master Jin compares his Way to a straw dog (chugou, a grass effigy used in ritual and discarded afterward), judging it inferior even to what the Yellow Emperor did, and so the discussion is lowered a step. Yet Master Jin only sees that Confucius’s Way is like a useless straw dog; he does not grasp that uselessness is precisely where usefulness lies. Huangdi’s actions, though still within deliberate doing, already mark its highest reach; when deliberate action reaches its limit, it at last passes into non-action (wuwei—not forcing, but following what is natural). Hence the text goes on to Confucius asking Laozi (Lao Dan) about the Way.

The Way gathers in emptiness; only emptiness is spacious enough to hold the Way. When the heart is empty, it can be single-minded, and in acting nothing is blocked. Without emptiness, the Way cannot gather—hence “without an inner master, one does not stop”; without singleness of mind, one cannot penetrate—hence “without outer correctness, one does not proceed.” What has gathered within must manifest outward—this is emerging from the center. What emerges from the center—does it come by receiving from outside? That is exactly why the sage holds fast to the inner, hence “what comes from within is not received from without—the sage does not go out.” What manifests outward is because it has already gathered within—this is entering from without. What enters from without—can it gather without emptiness? That is exactly why the sage must act in the world, hence “what enters from without has no master in the center—the sage does not hide.” This is what Laozi meant by the beginning and end of entering the Way and putting it to use.

孔子见老聃而语仁义老聃曰夫播糠眯目则天地四方易位矣蚊虻噆肤则通昔不寐矣夫仁义然乃愤吾心乱莫大焉吾子使天下无失其朴吾子亦放风而动总德而立矣又奚杰然若负建鼔而求亡子者邪夫鹄不日浴而白乌不日黔而黑黑白之朴不足以为辩名誉之观不足以为广泉涸鱼相与处于陆相呴以湿相濡以沫不若相忘于江湖孔子见老聃归三日不谈弟子问曰夫子见老聃亦将何规哉孔子曰吾乃今于是乎见龙龙合而成体散而成章乘乎云气而养乎阴阳予口张而不能嗋予又何规老聃哉子贡曰然则人固有尸居而龙见雷声而渊默发动如天地者乎赐亦可得而观乎遂以孔子声见老聃老聃方将倨堂而应微曰予年运而徃矣子将何以默发动如天地者乎赐亦可得而观乎遂以孔子声见老聃老聃方将倨堂而应微曰予年运而徃矣子将何以戒我乎子贡曰夫三王五帝之治天下不同其系声名一也而先生独以为非圣人如何哉老聃曰小子少进子何以谓不同对曰尧授舜舜授禹禹用力而汤用兵文王顺纣而不敢逆武王逆纣而不肯顺故曰不同老聃曰小子少进余语女三王五帝之治天下黄帝之治天下使民心一民有其亲死不哭而民不非也尧之治天下使民心亲民有为其亲杀其杀而民不非也舜之治天下使民心竞民孕妇十月生子子生五月而能言不至乎孩而始谁则人始有天矣禹之治天下使民心变人有心而兵有顺杀盗非杀人自为种而天下耳是以天下大骇儒墨皆起其作始有伦而今乎妇女何言哉余语女三皇五帝之治天下名曰治之而乱莫甚焉三皇之知上悖天下耳是以天下大骇儒墨皆起其作始有伦而今乎妇女何言哉余语女三皇五帝之治天下名曰治之而乱莫甚焉三皇之知上悖日月之明下暌山川之精中堕四时之施其知于虿之尾鲜规之兽莫得安其性命之情者而犹自以为圣人不可耻乎其无耻也子贡蹙蹙然立不安孔子谓老聃曰丘治诗书礼乐易春秋六经自以为乆矣孰知其故矣以奸者七十二君论先王之道而明周召之迹一君无所钩用甚矣夫人之难说也道之难明邪老子曰幸矣子之不遇治世之君也夫六经先王之陈迹也岂其所以迹哉今子之所言犹迹也夫迹履之所出而迹岂履哉夫白鶂之相视眸子不运而风化虫雄鸣于上风子曰幸矣子之不遇治世之君也夫六经先王之陈迹也岂其所以迹哉今子之所言犹迹也夫迹履之所出而迹岂履哉夫白鶂之相视眸子不运而风化虫雄鸣于上风雌应于下风而风化自为雌雄故风化性不可易命不可变时不可止道不可壅苟得于道无自而不可失焉者无自而可孔子不出三月复见曰丘得之矣乌鹊鱼傅沫细要者化有弟而兄啼乆矣夫丘不与化为人不与化为人安能化人老子曰可丘得之矣
Interpretation

When Confucius went to see Laozi and spoke with him about ren and yi (benevolence and righteousness), Laozi said: When chaff is blown into the eyes, the directions of heaven and earth all seem wrong; when a mosquito or gadfly bites the skin, one cannot sleep all night. When ren and yi suddenly stir my heart, the disorder they cause is greater than anything else. If you could keep the people of the world from losing their plain authenticity—their natural character untouched by artificial carving—you should move with the wind and stand firm in de (Virtue/Power). Why must you proclaim yourself as loudly as beating a great drum to search for a lost child? A swan need not bathe every day to be white; a crow need not dye itself every day to be black. The true colors of black and white are not worth arguing over; the outward show of reputation is not worth spreading. When a spring dries up, fish are stranded together on dry land, moistening one another with damp breath and wetting one another with spittle—far inferior to forgetting one another in the rivers and lakes.

When Confucius returned from seeing Laozi, he did not speak for three days. His disciples asked: Master, when you saw Laozi, what did you intend to use to admonish him? Confucius said: Only today have I truly seen a dragon. A dragon gathered becomes a whole body; scattered, it becomes patterned splendor. It rides on clouds and mist and is nourished by yin and yang. I opened my mouth but could not get words out—what could I use to admonish Laozi?

Zigong (Confucius’s disciple, named Ci) said: Then is there truly someone who in stillness is like death yet in spirit appears like a dragon, whose voice is like thunder yet whose calm is like an abyss, whose movements are like heaven and earth? May I go and see him too? So he went to see Laozi using Confucius’s name. Laozi was sitting casually in the hall and said softly: My years have already passed—what will you use to warn me?

Zigong said: The Three Kings and Five Emperors governed the world with different methods, yet the fame they sought was the same. Only you, Master, hold that they were not sages—why? Laozi said: Young man, step forward a little. On what basis do you say they differed? Zigong answered: Yao passed the throne to Shun, Shun to Yu; Yu relied on labor to control the waters, Tang of Shang relied on military force to conquer; King Wen of Zhou submitted to King Zhou of Shang and did not dare resist, King Wu of Zhou resisted King Zhou and would not submit—so they say the methods differed.

Laozi said: Young man, come closer still. I will tell you how the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors governed the world. When the Yellow Emperor ruled, he made people’s hearts uniform; when someone’s kin died and they did not weep, others did not blame them. When Yao ruled, he made people’s hearts lean toward affection; when someone lowered the rank of mourning for kin, others did not blame them. When Shun ruled, he made people’s hearts competitive; pregnant women gave birth after ten months, infants spoke at five months, and before children were fully grown they began to distinguish one from another—people from then on began to die young. When Yu ruled, he made people’s hearts changeable; everyone harbored schemes of their own, and using troops was seen as rightful conduct. Killing a thief was not counted as killing a person; each person formed their own faction—the world was no more than that. Thus the world was greatly disturbed, and Confucian and Mohist schools rose together. At first matters still had order and principle; now they have fallen into such chaos—what more is there to say! I tell you: the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors governed the world in name as governance, yet the calamity and disorder were greater than any before. The cleverness of the Three Sovereigns disturbed the light of sun and moon above, turned against the essence of mountains and rivers below, and in between ruined the proper movement of the four seasons. Such cleverness is more vicious than a scorpion’s sting; even tiny insects and beasts cannot keep to the nature of their lives in peace—yet they take themselves for sages. Can they not feel shame? They are truly shameless!

When Zigong heard this, he stood awkwardly, ill at ease.

Confucius said to Laozi: I have studied the Six Classics—the Shi, Shu, Li, Yue, Yi, and Chunqiu—and thought that after long effort I had mastered their old matters. I went before seventy-two rulers with them, expounding the ways of the former kings and clarifying the deeds of the Duke of Zhou and the Duke of Shao, yet not one ruler would adopt them. To persuade people is truly hard! Is it that the Dao is hard to make clear?

Laozi said: You have not met a ruler who can truly govern the age—consider that good fortune! The Six Classics are only the old footprints left by the former kings, not the shoe that made the footprint. What you speak of now is still nothing but footprints. Footprints come from shoes—are footprints the shoes themselves? White herons face each other without moving their eyeballs and conceive by mutual resonance; among insects the male calls upwind and the female responds downwind and they conceive by resonance; creatures called “lei” have both male and female in one body and can generate in the same way. This kind of transformation by influence means living things conceive and change through mutual responsiveness. Nature cannot be altered, fate cannot be changed, the times cannot be halted, and the great Dao cannot be blocked. One who truly obtains the Dao has nowhere they cannot go; one who loses the Dao has nowhere they can go.

Confucius did not leave his house for three months, then went again to see Laozi and said: I understand now. Crows and magpies hatch their young; fish exchange by blowing bubbles; the potter wasp transforms other insects to continue its line; when a younger brother is born, the elder brother weeps from loss of affection. For long I could not follow change in being human; if I cannot follow change in being human myself, how can I transform others?

Laozi said: That will do. Kong Qiu, you have understood.

有为者必有迹故庄子至此而寓言老聃诮孔子治人而以陈迹也然六经载道之书书者为道之粗由粗可以至于精精则无所为丘得之矣 有为者必有迹故庄子至此而寓言老聃诮孔子治人而以陈迹也然六经载道之书书者为道之粗由粗可以至于精精则无所为而已此所以终孔子不与化为人之言也夫不与化为人者付之自化也付之自化则无所为是以言之于篇终也故曰丘不与化为人不与化为人安能化人老子曰可丘得之矣 南华真经新传卷七 钦定四库全书 南华真经新传卷八 宋 王雱 撰 刻意篇 夫虚静寂寞之道废则矫削僻异之行兴此世俗之忘于无为而灭天也庄子因而作刻意篇
Interpretation

When one acts with deliberate purpose, traces are inevitably left. At this point in the text, Zhuangzi uses a parable to have Laozi (Lao Dan) rebuke Confucius: governing the people by merely following the tracks left by predecessors. The Six Classics (Confucian canonical texts) are books that bear the Dao, yet what is fixed in writing is only the coarse outline of the Way; from the coarse one may advance to the subtle, and the subtle is precisely Wuwei (non-action). Confucius had already understood this.

Deliberate action necessarily leaves traces, so here Zhuangzi, in a parable, has Laozi mock Confucius for governing people through inherited tracks. Though the Six Classics carry the Dao, the words on the page are only the rough imprint of the Way—from the rough one can reach the refined, and the refined is nothing other than Wuwei. Hence the chapter closes with Confucius’s words on “not making oneself a man alongside transformation.” Not making oneself a man alongside transformation means not forcing oneself to keep pace with creation and transformation as a person, but letting change complete itself in things; entrusting matters to self-transformation is Wuwei, which is why this theme concludes the whole chapter. The text says: Qiu cannot follow transformation and be a man for others; if he cannot do this, how can he transform others? Laozi said: “You may—Qiu has already understood.”

New Commentary on the Authentic Scripture of Southern Flowering, fascicle 7.

Complete Library of the Four Treasures (Imperial Qing dynasty compendium).

New Commentary on the Authentic Scripture of Southern Flowering, fascicle 8, by Wang Peng of the Song dynasty.

The “Deliberate Intent” chapter (on deliberately adorning mind and conduct): Once the Dao of emptiness, stillness, and silence is abandoned, contrived, carved, eccentric conduct rises up. This is the world forgetting Wuwei and extinguishing innate nature (natural disposition). Zhuangzi therefore wrote this chapter.

刻意尚行离世异俗高论怨诽为亢而已矣此山谷之士非世之人枯槁赴渊者之所好也语仁义忠信恭俭推让为修而已矣此平世之士教诲之人游居学者之所好也语大功立大名礼君臣正上下为治而已矣此朝廷之士尊主强国之人致功并兼者之所好也就薮泽处闲旷钓鱼闲处无为而已矣此江海之士避世之人闲暇者之所好也吹为治而已矣此朝廷之士尊主强国之人致功并兼者之所好也就薮泽处闲旷钓鱼闲处无为而已矣此江海之士避世之人闲暇者之所好也吹呴呼吸吐故纳新熊经鸟申为寿而已矣此导引之士养形之人彭祖寿考者之所好也若夫不刻意而高无仁义而修无功名而治无江海而闲不导引而寿无不忘也无不有也澹然无极而众美从之此天地之道圣人之德也
Interpretation

Some people deliberately refine their conduct, withdraw from the world and reject common ways, speak loftily and complain and mock—merely seeking a reputation for aloof superiority. This is what those who hide in valleys and reject the age, and those who waste away and throw themselves into rivers, prefer.

Some people preach benevolence, righteousness, loyalty, and trustworthiness, courtesy, frugality, and modesty—merely seeking self-cultivation. This is what those born in peaceful times who take teaching others as their work, and those who travel to study and dwell in learning, prefer.

Some people talk of establishing great merit and a great name, treating ruler and minister with ritual and correcting the order of high and low—merely seeking good governance. This is what those in court, and those who honor the ruler, strengthen the state, and build achievement while annexing other states, prefer.

Some people go to lakes and marshes, live in empty places, fish and idle—merely seeking quiet Wuwei (non-action). This is what those who roam rivers and seas, avoid worldly affairs, and crave leisure prefer.

Some people blow and exhale, breathe in and out (slowly releasing and drawing breath), expel stale air and take in fresh, practice “bear-hanging” and “bird-stretching” (like a bear clinging, like a bird extending its limbs)—merely seeking long life. This is what those who practice daoyin (guiding and pulling—using movement with breath to nurture the body) and preserve the form, and those who enjoy great longevity like Peng Zu (legendary figure of extreme long life), prefer.

As for those who are naturally lofty without deliberate artifice, naturally cultivated without preaching benevolence and righteousness, naturally well-governed without seeking fame and merit, naturally at ease without hiding on rivers and seas, naturally long-lived without daoyin—there is nothing they cannot forget, and nothing they cannot have. They are calm and quiet without end, and every good thing comes to them. This is the Great Dao of Heaven and Earth, the De (Virtue/Power) of the sage.

夫山谷平世之士疆国避世养形之人皆为有我而已矣夫有我则有心有心则未免于所惑是以各蔽于一曲也故乐于山薮者徃而不能返仕于朝廷者入而不能出恬于教诲者屈而不能伸耽于养形者存而不能忘是非真性之然也是矫削其意而使然也岂与圣人相同乎圣人则无我而已矣夫无我则无心无心则无所惑是以忘形而通达于万事也故登假于至道而乃入于寥天一岂为刻意也是矫削其意而使然也岂与圣人相同乎圣人则无我而已矣夫无我则无心无心则无所惑是以忘形而通达于万事也故登假于至道而乃入于寥天一岂为刻意而高欤物泽世而非由于外铄岂为行仁义而修欤巍巍荡荡而在宥于天下岂为立功名而治欤渊静晦默而逍遥于自得之场岂为处江湖而闲欤气柔真全而形未尝衰岂为务导引而寿欤存而不存也无而不无莫知其终而至道自集皆无为之至妙而惟圣人所以得之矣故曰不刻意而高无仁义而修无功名而治无江海而闲无导引而寿无不忘也无不有也澹然无极而众美从之此天地之道圣人之德也
Interpretation

Hermits in mountain valleys, those who wish to pacify the world, those devoted to strengthening the state, recluses who withdraw from society, and those who fix solely on nurturing the body—all they do is cling to the sense of “me.” Where there is “me,” there are thoughts and intentions; where there are thoughts and intentions, delusion cannot be avoided, and each person is hemmed in by a one-sided view. Hence those who love mountains, forests, lakes, and marshes go off and cannot return; those who enter court service step in and cannot step out; those content with teaching and admonition bend themselves and cannot unfold; those sunk in preserving the physical form hoard the body and cannot forget it. This is not how true nature is by origin—it comes from forcibly correcting and trimming the mind—so how could it be the same as the sage?

The sage is simply “without self.” Without self, there are no clinging thoughts; without thoughts, there is nothing to be deluded by, and so one can forget the bodily form and penetrate all affairs, ascend to the highest Dao, and enter the vast oneness with Heaven (liao tian yi)—that boundless, empty expanse in which one is one with Heaven.

How could this be loftiness achieved by deliberate artifice? The sage benefits the myriad things and extends grace to the world—not by imposing something from outside; how could cultivating oneself be done for the sake of promoting benevolence and righteousness? He is lofty and broad, treating the world with Zaiyou (letting-be, leaving all at ease without interference)—not in order to build merit and fame through governance. He is deep, still, and reticent, roaming at ease in self-sufficiency—not to seek leisure by dwelling beside rivers and seas. His breath is gentle and his true nature intact; his form never decays—not to pursue long life through daoyin (guiding and pulling—breath work and limbering exercises) alone.

He seems to persist yet does not cling to persisting; seems absent yet is not fixated on absence. No one knows his end point, yet the highest Dao gathers to him of itself. All this is the utmost subtlety of Wuwei (non-action), which only the sage can attain. Therefore it is said: without deliberate loftiness, one is naturally lofty; without brandishing benevolence and righteousness, one is naturally cultivated; without chasing fame and achievement, one can naturally govern; without relying on rivers and seas, one is naturally at leisure; without practicing daoyin, one naturally enjoys long life—there is nothing that cannot be released, and nothing that cannot be fully possessed. When one is plain and unforced without exhaustion, every kind of excellence comes of itself. This is the great Dao of Heaven and Earth and the De (virtue/power) of the sage.

故曰夫恬淡寂寞虚无无为此天地之平而道德之质也故曰圣人休休焉则平易矣平易则恬淡矣平易恬淡则忧患不能入邪气不能袭故其德全而神不亏故曰圣人之生也天行其死也物化静而与阴同德动而与阳同波不为福先不为祸始感而后应廹而后动不得已而后起去知淡则忧患不能入邪气不能袭故其德全而神不亏故曰圣人之生也天行其死也物化静而与阴同德动而与阳同波不为福先不为祸始感而后应廹而后动不得已而后起去知与故循天之理故无天灾无物累无人非无责其生若浮其死若休不思虑不豫谋光矣而不耀信矣而不期其寝不梦其觉无忧其神纯粹其魂不罢虚无恬淡乃合天德故曰悲乐者德之邪喜怒者道之过好恶者德之失
Interpretation

Therefore tranquility, stillness, emptiness, and Wuwei (non-action) are the original equilibrium of Heaven and Earth and the essence of Dao and De (Virtue/Power). When the sage rests in stillness, the heart becomes level and plain; once the heart is level and plain, it returns to tranquil simplicity. Being both level and plain and tranquil and simple, care and calamity cannot invade, and perverse qi cannot assail—thus De is complete and Shen (spirit) is not depleted.

While alive, the sage moves with the natural course; when dead, he transforms along with the myriad things. In stillness he shares one De-nature with Yin (the soft, quiescent aspect); in movement he flows with the surge of Yang (the firm, active aspect). He does not rush ahead to seek fortune, nor open the gate to disaster; he responds only when stirred, acts only when pushed, and rises up only when he must. Casting off cleverness and artificial contrivance, he follows only the principle of nature—so there are no disasters from Heaven, no entanglement from external things, no censure from others, and no punishment from ghosts and spirits. Alive, he is like one adrift; dead, he is like one at rest. He does not scheme or plan ahead. Bright yet not showy, sincere yet not bound to fixed promises. When he sleeps he dreams no dreams; when he wakes he bears no anxiety. Shen is pure, Hun and Po (soul and spirit) unwearied. Empty, tranquil, and plain—this accords with Heavenly De (the virtue that belongs to nature by birth).

Therefore it is said: sorrow and joy are deviations of De; delight and anger are faults against Dao; liking and disliking are the loss of De.

平易者所谓无滞碍也恬惔者所谓无思虑也忧患不能入者所谓哀乐不能入也邪气不能袭者所谓喜怒不能感也如此则自得而神王矣故思虑也忧患不能入者所谓哀乐不能入也邪气不能袭者所谓喜怒不能感也如此则自得而神王矣故曰其德全而神不亏神不亏则以生死为徃来之暂矣故曰圣人之生也天行其死也物化夫死生至大而以之为徃来则祸福之微岂能累我乎故曰不为福先不为祸始感而后应者所谓德充而符合也廹而后动者所谓事至而应也不得已而后起者所谓不豫谋也不以智行已不以故灭命守于自然之真理也故曰去知与故循天之理无天灾者与天合德而天不灾也无物累者与物齐谐而物莫役也无人非者出于非人之域而明不散也无责者与神同其吉凶而无不佑也此数者非圣人孰能与此矣
Interpretation

When the mind is even and unobstructed, that is ease; when there is no anxious thought or clinging, that is tranquility (tian dan). “Affliction cannot enter” means neither sorrow nor joy can penetrate the inner self; “no perverse qi can invade” means neither delight nor anger can sway one. In that state one rests in self-sufficiency and the vigor of spirit (shen wang) flourishes.

Thus when De is complete, spirit is not depleted. When spirit is not depleted, one treats birth and death as no more than a brief coming and going. While alive, the sage acts in accord with the Dao of Heaven; in dying, he transforms together with the myriad things. If even the greatest matters of life and death are regarded only as passage, how could minor fortune or misfortune bind him?

Therefore he does not rush ahead of blessing nor become the source of calamity. “Responding only after being touched” means De is full and he merges with things; “acting only when pressed” means he meets events as they arrive; “rising only when there is no choice” means he does not plot beforehand. He does not drive himself with cleverness nor harm Heaven’s mandate through artificial contrivance—he simply holds to the natural truth. Hence one should discard cleverness and deliberate artifice (zhi and gu) and follow Heaven’s principle.

Without calamities from Heaven, one shares virtue with Heaven and Heaven sends no disaster. Without being burdened by things, one harmonizes with the myriad beings and they cannot enslave him. Without reproach from others, one stands beyond the reach of blame while clear awareness does not scatter. Without ghostly punishment (wu gui ze), one shares fortune and misfortune with spirits and is protected everywhere. Who but a sage could achieve these several things?

故心不忧乐德之至也一而不变静之至也无所于迕虚之至也不与物交淡之至也无所于逆粹之至也故曰形劳而不休则弊精用而不已则劳劳则竭水之性不杂则清莫动则平郁也无所于迕虚之至也不与物交淡之至也无所于逆粹之至也故曰形劳而不休则弊精用而不已则劳劳则竭水之性不杂则清莫动则平郁闭而不流亦不能清天德之象也故曰纯粹而不杂静一而不变淡而无为动而以天行此养神之道也夫有于越之剑者柙而藏之不敢用也宝之至也精神四达并流无所不极上际于天下蟠于地化育万物不可为象其名为同帝纯素之道唯神是守守而不失与神为一一之精通合于天伦
Interpretation

When the heart is neither shaken by sorrow nor lifted by joy, that is the utmost of De (Virtue/Power). To be single-minded and unchanging is the utmost of stillness. To meet external things without friction is the utmost of emptiness. Not to be entangled or entwined with what is outside is the utmost of plainness (dan). To be without anything contrary is the utmost of purity. Therefore it is said: if the body is worn with labor and never rests, it will be exhausted; if spirit is spent without cease, it will be depleted—and depletion leads to drying up.

The inherent nature of water is to be clear when nothing mixed defiles it, and level when nothing stirs it; yet if it is blocked and cannot flow, it cannot stay clear either. That is just how the virtue of Heaven (tiande, natural virtue) appears. Therefore it is said: to be pure and unmixed, tranquil and single-minded without change, plain and without deliberate action, and in movement to follow what is natural—this is the way to nourish spirit (yangshen, conserving the spirit).

There is a sword from the region of Yue, famed for its blades: placed in a case and kept in store, not daring to use it lightly—only thus is cherishing carried to the extreme. When spirit extends in all directions and flows abroad together, reaching everywhere—ascending to Heaven, spreading over Earth, transforming the ten thousand things—yet cannot be pictured in any fixed form, its name is “same as the Emperor” (tong di, sharing the Emperor’s function). The way of pure simplicity lies solely in holding fast to spirit; hold fast without losing it, and one becomes one with spirit; in the subtlety and penetration of that oneness, one aligns with the principle of Heaven (tianlun, Heaven’s natural order).

圣人之心喜惧不入而自得故曰心不忧乐德之至也守一有常而物莫足挠故曰一而不变静之至也正错无累而旷兮善应故曰无所于迕虚之至也外能役物而洞然清彻故曰不与物交淡之至也同乎大顺而极于精粹故曰无所于逆粹之至也圣人之心若是也夫圣人之心精神故曰无所于迕虚之至也外能役物而洞然清彻故曰不与物交淡之至也同乎大顺而极于精粹故曰无所于逆粹之至也圣人之心若是也夫圣人之心精神之宅也惟圣人能养其神而不轻用如韫藏利器而不敢妄用也故曰夫有干越之剑者藏而柙之不敢用也宝之至也故圣人宝养精神之如此其通达无所不至而其奥妙与天地同流造化万物而视之不可见成于天而已矣故曰精神并流无所不极上际于天下蟠于地化育万物不可为象其名为同帝 野语有之曰众人重利廉士重名贤士尚志圣人贵精利者所以和义者也众人重之而已矣故曰众人重利名者所以为实之宾也廉士重之而已矣故曰廉士重名志者心之所之于遂大也贤士尚之而已矣故曰贤士尚志精者纯粹不杂之道也圣人贵之而已矣故曰圣人贵精故利不及于名名不及于志志不及于精此所以言之有序也
Interpretation

The sage’s heart is a place where neither joy nor fear can gain entry, yet he remains utterly at ease within himself. Hence it is said: when the heart knows neither worry nor elation, that is the utmost of De. Holding to unity (shou yi—guarding inner singleness) without wavering, nothing in the outer world can disturb him. Hence it is said: singleness without change is the utmost of stillness. Posture settled and upright, free of entanglement, the breast broad and responsive—hence it is said: nothing opposes him; that is the utmost of emptiness. Outwardly he can employ the ten thousand things, yet inwardly he is clear and penetrating—hence it is said: not tangled in interchange with things; that is the utmost of plainness. Aligning with great compliance (da shun—accord with nature), he reaches refined purity—hence it is said: nothing runs counter to him; that is the utmost of essence. Such is the sage’s heart. This speaks of the inner state of nourishing spirit and guarding unity.

The sage’s heart is the dwelling of spirit (the inner Jing and Shen). Only the sage can nourish his Shen and not lightly expend it—as one stores a sharp weapon and dares not use it rashly. Hence it is said: one who possesses the sword of Gan and Yue keeps it in its scabbard and dares not draw it; that is cherishing to the extreme. The sage’s cherishing of spirit is the same. His penetration reaches everywhere; subtlety turns with Heaven and Earth; he transforms and begets the ten thousand things, yet what appears has no visible form—it is simply what Heaven accomplishes. Hence it is said: spirit flows together and spreads; there is nowhere it does not reach—ascending to the sky’s edge, winding below upon the earth, transforming and nurturing the ten thousand things, unable to be drawn as a concrete image—this is called “same as the Emperor” (tong di—function identical to the Heavenly Sovereign).

Common saying has it: ordinary people value profit; incorruptible gentlemen value reputation; worthy men esteem purpose; sages treasure Jing (essence). Profit serves to pair with righteousness—ordinary people merely prize it, hence “the multitude weight profit.” Reputation is the appendage of reality—the incorruptible gentleman merely prizes it, hence “the incorruptible gentleman weights reputation.” Purpose is the direction of the heart, used to accomplish what is vast—the worthy man exalts it, hence “the worthy man honors purpose.” Jing is the Way in pure undivided form—the sage treasures it, hence “the sage esteems Jing.” Therefore profit does not match reputation, reputation does not match purpose, purpose does not match Jing—so the ordering is spoken in sequence.

What is called “plainness” (su) says precisely this: the worthy man honors purpose; the sage treasures pure undivided Jing; profit does not match reputation, reputation does not match purpose, purpose does not match Jing—the saying has its proper order.

故素也者谓已矣故曰贤士尚志精者纯粹不杂之道也圣人贵之而已矣故曰圣人贵精故利不及于名名不及于志志不及于精此所以言之有序也 故素也者谓其无所与杂也纯也者谓其不亏其神也能体纯素谓之真人 纯者不杂也素者质朴也素则至于纯纯则至于粹粹则至于精精则至于神而已矣故曰纯素之道惟神是守能守而自得与圣无二矣故曰守而勿失与神为一一者道之妙本而归于自然无为矣故曰一之精通合于天伦此言入神之序也 缮性篇 夫矫削僻异之行非出于人之天真而生于世俗之伪心伪心用则正性所以失正性失而不悟其自失复欲以伪而完治矣庄子因而作缮性篇 缮性于俗学以求复其初滑欲于俗思以求致其明谓之蔽之民 夫天之付人之性也本于静而已矣静则明明则无所不通世俗受天之性也以静而必动而静不谓之善明而不显则明不足耀众是以外逐异学而求善其静内务思虑而増益其明明则无所不通世俗受天之性也以静而必动而静不谓之善明而不显则明不足耀众是以外逐异学而求善其静内务思虑而増益其明异学虽得而其静反动思虑愈精而其明愈晦以其反动而治性以复其静以其愈晦而役思以复其明此非该徧之士矣故曰谓之蔽之民 古之治道者以恬养知生而无以知为也谓之以知养恬知与恬交相养而和理出其性
Interpretation

What is meant by “su” (plain simplicity) is that nothing is mixed in with anything else; what is meant by “chun” (pure simplicity) is that one does not drain one’s own spirit (shen). One who can discern and hold fast to this purity and plainness is called a zhenren (True Person)—one who preserves original authenticity and accords with the Dao.

Chun is being unmixed; su is being plain and unadorned. From su one may reach chun, from chun one may reach cui (refined purity), from cui one may reach jing (essence), and from jing one may finally reach shen (the utmost of spirit). Thus the way of chun and su consists solely in guarding the spirit; one who can guard it and rest naturally in sufficiency is no different from a sage. Hence it is also said: hold fast without losing it, and one becomes one with spirit. This “one” is the subtle root of the Dao, ultimately returning to natural wuwei (non-action). Thus it is said: the subtle penetration of “one” accords with the pattern of Heaven’s spontaneity. This describes the stages of entering the realm of spirit.

The “Shanxing” (Preserving / Restoring Nature) Chapter

Forced carving, eccentricity, and perverse conduct do not arise from human genuineness but are born from the hypocritical heart of the world. Once the hypocritical heart is set in motion, the proper nature is lost because of it; nature is already lost, yet one does not understand that one has lost it oneself and still wants to patch and repair with hypocrisy. Zhuangzi therefore composed the “Shanxing” chapter (on how to cultivate and restore nature).

Using worldly learning to repair nature in order to recover the original; using worldly deliberation to disturb desires in order to gain clarity—such a person is called a bimeng zhi min (a person obscured and deluded).

Heaven endows human nature with nothing but quiet purity. In quiet purity there is clarity; in clarity nothing is blocked. Worldly people receive this quiet nature yet insist on restless motion and do not treat quiet as good; though clear they do not display it, feeling it insufficient to show off before the crowd. Then outwardly they chase heterodox learning to improve their quiet, inwardly they apply deliberation to increase their clarity. Even if heterodox learning yields something, quiet turns into agitation; the finer the deliberation, the dimmer the clarity. Using this reversed agitation to govern nature in order to recover quiet, using an ever-darker heart to drive deliberation in order to recover clarity—this is not the person of thorough penetration. Hence such people are called the obscured and deluded.

In antiquity those who governed by the Dao used tiandan (quiet plainness) to nourish knowing-and-perception; through life they did not use knowing-and-perception to act—this is called using knowing-and-perception to nourish tiandan. Knowing-and-perception and tiandan nourish each other, and harmony and order arise from nature itself.

恬者静也智者动也静出于恬则所谓善于静动出于智则所谓善于动动必复于静静必至于动以恬而静则万物莫足铙以智而动则万物莫足止此圣人善于动静而不逆其理如出于性而已故曰知与恬交相养而和理出于性 夫德和也道理也德无不容仁也道无不理义也义明而物亲忠也中纯实而此圣人善于动静而不逆其理如出于性而已故曰知与恬交相养而和理出于性 夫德和也道理也德无不容仁也道无不理义也义明而物亲忠也中纯实而反乎情乐也信行容体而顺乎文礼也礼乐偏行则天下乱矣彼正而己德德则不冒冒则物必失其性也 德者得也自得则和不欲出也故曰德和也道者道也可道则必有其理故曰道理也自得而能容则兼爱矣故曰德无不容仁也可道而顺理则必当矣故曰道无不理义也义当则得中而物附矣故曰义明而物亲忠也中纯实而反乎情乐也所谓乐由中出也信行容体而顺乎文礼也所谓礼自外作也礼乐者道德之绪余圣人不专用而治天下也故曰礼乐而物亲忠也中纯实而反乎情乐也所谓乐由中出也信行容体而顺乎文礼也所谓礼自外作也礼乐者道德之绪余圣人不专用而治天下也故曰礼乐偏行而天下乱矣此庄子不贵礼乐之言也
Interpretation

Tranquility means quietude; wisdom means activity. Quietude that arises from calm detachment is what counts as skill in stillness; activity that arises from wisdom is what counts as skill in movement. When movement reaches its extreme it must return to stillness; when stillness reaches its extreme it must turn toward movement. Relying on calm detachment for stillness, nothing in the ten thousand things is enough to disturb you; relying on wisdom for movement, nothing in the ten thousand things is enough to block you. The sage is skilled in movement and stillness yet does not violate the principle within them—it is as if each simply issues from nature itself. Hence it is said: knowing and calm detachment nourish each other, and both harmony and order arise from true nature.

De is harmony; Dao is order and pattern. De can embrace all things—this is benevolence (ren). Dao gives each affair its proper pattern—this is righteousness (yi). When the measure of yi is clear, the ten thousand things draw near—this is loyalty (zhong). When the inner mind is pure and full and one returns to genuine disposition—this is joy (le). When conduct is sincere and bearing is fitting, and one accords with cultural refinement and ritual form—this is ritual propriety (li). Li and le are meant to regulate conduct and feeling; if they are pushed one-sidedly, the world falls into disorder. When a person straightens himself and holds De quietly within, De is not imposed outward; once it is forced upon things, the ten thousand things inevitably lose their own natures.

De means “attainment”: having attained within, the inner person is harmonious and does not wish to display it—hence De is called harmony. Dao is a path that can be followed; to follow it is necessarily to have order—hence Dao is called pattern. To have attained and yet be able to embrace is universal care—hence De, in embracing all, is benevolence. To follow Dao and accord with pattern so that nothing one does is inappropriate is righteousness—hence Dao, in leaving nothing unordered, is righteousness. When yi is applied fittingly, one occupies the center and is upright, and things attach themselves—hence clear yi and close things is loyalty. Inner purity and return to true feeling is joy issuing from the heart. Sincere conduct and appropriate bearing that accord with outer adornment is li fashioned from without. Li and le are only the trailing extensions of De; the sage in governing the world does not rely on them exclusively—so when li and le are emphasized and pushed, the world is disordered. This is what Zhuangzi (the Daoist thinker) meant in not valuing li and le.

古之人在混芒之中与一世而得澹漠焉当是时也阴阳和静神不扰四时得节万物不伤群生不夭人虽有知无所用之此之谓至一当是时也莫之为而常自然逮德下衰及燧人伏戏始为天下是故顺而不一德又下衰及神农黄帝始为天下是故安而不顺德又下衰及唐虞始为天下兴治化之流□淳散朴离道以善险德以行然后去性而从于心心与心识知而不足以定天下然后附之以文益之以博文灭质博溺心然后民始惑乱无以反其性情而复其初由是观之世丧道矣道丧世矣世险德以行然后去性而从于心心与心识知而不足以定天下然后附之以文益之以博文灭质博溺心然后民始惑乱无以反其性情而复其初由是观之世丧道矣道丧世矣世与道交相丧也道之人何由兴乎世世亦何由兴乎道哉道无以兴乎世世无以兴乎道虽圣人不在山林之中其德隐矣 夫燧人伏羲可谓朴素之时也庄子以为不及混茫之初而谓其逮德下衰也神农黄帝可谓至平之世也庄子以为不及于羲燧之时而亦谓德又下衰也唐虞之际可谓至治之朝也庄子以为不及神黄之世而亦谓德又下衰也故燧人羲农黄帝唐虞庄子皆不取之而所取者古之混茫之初也夫混茫之中人守其真性事任其自然岂知有仁义礼乐之端高世出众之行而刻意缮性而效之欤此庄子之所取而言之以疾世俗也与前篇论至德之世泰初无有之意同
Interpretation

In ancient times, people lived in a state of primordial chaos (hunmang)—an undifferentiated, obscure original condition—sharing quiet simplicity with their entire generation. Yin and Yang were harmoniously at rest, spirits and ghosts did not disturb, the four seasons followed their proper cycles, nothing in the ten thousand things suffered harm, and no living being died prematurely. Though people possessed intelligence and skill, they had nowhere to apply them. This was called the most perfect unity (zhiyi)—the supreme state of pure oneness.

When De (Virtue/Power) began to decline, Suiren (the Fire-making Ruler) and Fuxi came to govern the world. They could only follow the inclinations of the people, yet could no longer preserve that pure unity. When De declined further, Shennong (the Divine Farmer) and the Yellow Emperor governed the world. Though the realm was settled, they could no longer act in accord with natural spontaneity. When De declined again, during the reigns of Tang-Yao and Yu-Shun, the currents of governance and transformation arose. What was genuine and thick became thin and shallow; what was plain and simple was scattered and lost. People abandoned the Dao (the Way) to pursue goodness, used deliberate action to harm the virtue of naturalness, and thus forsook their original nature to follow artificial contrivance. Minds measured one another through cleverness, yet this was insufficient to settle the world, so ornamentation was added and erudition was piled on. Ornamentation extinguished plainness, erudition drowned the original mind, and from then on the common people grew confused and disordered, unable to return to their true nature or recover their original simplicity.

Viewed in this light, the world lost the Dao, and the Dao lost the world—the two mutually lost one another. How could a person of the Dao arise in the world, and how could the world enable the Dao to arise? The Dao could not arise in the world, nor could the world cause the Dao to arise. Even if a sage did not withdraw to the mountains and forests, his De had already been hidden away.

The age of Suiren and Fuxi might be called plain and simple, yet Zhuang Zi considered it inferior to the primordial chaos of the beginning, and therefore said that De had already declined. The age of Shennong and the Yellow Emperor might be called supremely peaceful, yet Zhuang Zi considered it inferior to the age of Fuxi and Suiren, and therefore said that De had declined further. The age of Tang-Yao and Yu-Shun might be called excellently governed, yet Zhuang Zi considered it inferior to the age of Shennong and the Yellow Emperor, and therefore said that De had declined once more. Thus Zhuang Zi did not regard any of these ages as the highest. What he valued was the remote primordial beginning, when people preserved their true nature, letting everything follow natural spontaneity. How could they have known the first traces of benevolence, righteousness, ritual, and music, or the conduct that transcends ordinary humanity? How could they have deliberately cultivated their nature to imitate such things? This is the meaning Zhuang Zi intended, using it to critique the secular world—a point consistent with the previous chapter's discussion of the age of supreme virtue and the primordial time when nothing whatsoever existed.

隐故不自隐古之所谓隐士者非伏其身刻意缮性而效之欤此庄子之所取而言之以疾世俗也与前篇论至德之世泰初无有之意同 隐故不自隐古之所谓隐士者非伏其身而弗见也非闭其言而不出也非藏其知而不发也时命大谬也当时命而大行乎天下则反一无迹不当时命而大穷乎天下则深根宁极而待此存身之道也 夫士隐于山林也非欲自匿其身也非欲自闭其言也非欲自藏其智也出于不得已而己故曰时命大谬也是以当盛行而不加益所以抱一而恬寂也故曰当时命大行乎天下则反一无迹当穷居而不加损所以深根而固蒂也故曰不当时命而大穷乎天下则深根宁极而待如此则能全其形也故曰此存身之道也 古之存身者不以辩饰知不以知穷天下不以知穷德危然处其所而反其性已又何为哉道固不小行德固不小识小识伤德小行伤道故曰正已而已矣乐全之谓得志古之所谓得志者非轩冕之谓也谓其无以益其乐而已矣今之所谓得志者轩冕之谓也轩冕在行伤道故曰正已而已矣乐全之谓得志古之所谓得志者非轩冕之谓也谓其无以益其乐而已矣今之所谓得志者轩冕之谓也轩冕在身非性命也物之傥来寄也寄之其来不可圉其去不可止故不为轩冕肆志不为穷约趋俗其乐彼与此同故无忧而已矣今寄去则不乐由是观之虽乐未尝不荒也故曰丧已于物失性于俗者谓之倒置之民
Interpretation

Reclusion is not deliberately hiding oneself away. What the ancients called recluses were not people who shut themselves in and artificially cultivated their nature in imitation of withdrawal. Zhuangzi discusses this idea in order to criticize conventional society; his purpose aligns with what earlier chapters call the “age of utmost virtue” (zhide zhi shi) and “in the grand beginning there was nothing” (taichu wuyou)—the primordial state before anything existed.

True withdrawal does not mean hiding from oneself. Ancient recluses did not simply vanish from sight, fall silent forever, or bury their wisdom. They acted as they did because the times and their fate were greatly out of joint. When the age was flourishing and the Dao could prevail throughout the world, they returned to oneness (yi) with the Way and left no trace behind. When the age was failing and the world was utterly impoverished, they sank deep roots, rested in utmost stillness, and waited. That is the method of preserving oneself.

When scholars withdrew to mountains and forests, they were not trying to conceal their bodies, seal their speech, or smother their talents. They had no choice—hence the phrase “the times and fate were greatly mistaken.” In a thriving age they added nothing extra; they simply held to oneness and dwelt in quiet simplicity—so when the times allowed the Dao to spread widely, they “returned to oneness without a trace.” In destitution they did not diminish themselves either; they only strengthened their foundation—so when the times were utterly barren, they “deeply rooted themselves in stillness and waited” (shen gen ning ji er dai). In this way they could keep body and life intact; that is why it is called the way of preserving the person.

Those in antiquity who preserved themselves did not adorn cleverness with rhetoric, did not use cleverness to harry the world, and did not use cleverness to strain their virtue. They solemnly guarded their proper place; after returning to their original nature, what more was there to do? The Dao does not dwell in petty conduct, and De (virtue/power) does not dwell in narrow views. Small cleverness injures De; small actions injure the Dao. Therefore it is said: straighten yourself and that is enough; when joy is whole and complete, that is called attaining one’s aim (de zhi).

What the ancients meant by attaining one’s aim was not carriage and cap (xuannian—the emblems of high office). It meant that nothing further could be added to their happiness. What people today call attaining one’s aim is precisely office and rank. Rank draws one into affairs and thereby harms the Dao—hence again: only rectify yourself; when joy is complete, that is true attainment. Regalia attached to the body is not something native to life and nature; it is an external thing that arrives by chance and lodges temporarily. When it comes, you cannot block it; when it goes, you cannot detain it. Therefore do not let high position loosen the mind, and do not cling to the vulgar when poor; joy is the same in both situations, so one can be without worry. Today, when that temporary lodging is lost, there is no joy—showing that this kind of happiness has never failed to disorder the heart. Hence it is said: those who lose themselves in externals and lose their nature in custom are called inverted people (daozhi zhi min)—people who have reversed root and branch.

乐全者所谓乐天知命而性不亏也夫乐天者所以知天知命者所以至命知天则任其自然至命则物不能役如此则正性所以全也正性全则自得自得则志无不得矣故曰乐全之谓得志得志者死生忧患富贵穷达皆不累于心而况轩冕之微乎故曰非轩冕之谓也 秋水篇 夫天下之世俗治性不以圣人之正道而徒逐诸子之志无不得矣故曰乐全之谓得志得志者死生忧患富贵穷达皆不累于心而况轩冕之微乎故曰非轩冕之谓也 秋水篇 夫天下之世俗治性不以圣人之正道而徒逐诸子之俗学俗学虽汗漫泛滥亦可观安知其无根源乎庄子因而作秋水篇
Interpretation

“Being complete in joy” means delighting in aligning with the Way of Heaven and understanding one’s own destiny, so that one’s original nature is never harmed. Delighting in Heaven serves to recognize the Way of Heaven; knowing destiny serves to grasp one’s allotted fate thoroughly. Once the Way of Heaven is recognized, one can leave everything to nature; once destiny is understood, external things can no longer enslave one. In this way the pure original nature can be fully preserved. When nature is preserved, the inner self finds satisfaction; when one can be satisfied, nothing in one’s aims fails to go smoothly. Therefore, being complete in joy is called “having attained one’s aim.” One who has attained his aim is not burdened in heart by death and life, worry and peril, wealth and honor, or poverty and obscurity—how much less by such slight external things as carriage and official cap (symbols of rank and worldly glory)? Thus “having attained one’s aim” does not mean gaining carriage and cap.

In the chapter “Autumn Floods,” Zhuangzi observes that people in the world who cultivate their nature do not follow the sage’s proper Way but chase the vulgar learning of the various masters. Though that learning is boundless and drifts without fixed mooring, it still has points worth noting; who can say it has no root at all? For this reason Zhuangzi wrote the chapter “Autumn Floods.”

秋水时至百川灌河泾流之大两涘渚崖之间不辩牛马于是焉河伯欣然自喜以天下之美为尽在已顺流而东行至于北海东面而视不见水端于是焉河伯始旋其面目望洋向若而叹曰野语有之曰闻道百以为莫已若者我之谓也且夫我尝闻少仲尼之闻而轻伯夷之义者始吾弗信今我睹子之难穷也吾非至于子之门则殆矣吾长见笑于大方之家北海若曰井而轻伯夷之义者始吾弗信今我睹子之难穷也吾非至于子之门则殆矣吾长见笑于大方之家北海若曰井鼃不可以语于海者拘于虚也夏虫不可以语于冰者笃于时也曲士不可以语于道者束于教也今尔出于崖涘观于大海乃知尔丑尔将可与语大理矣天下之水莫大于海万川归之不知何时止而不盈尾闾泄之不知何时已而不虚春秋不变水旱不知此其过江河之流不可为量数而吾未尝以此自多者自以比形于天地而受气于阴阳吾在天地之间犹小石小木之在大山也方存乎见少又奚以自多
Interpretation

When the autumn floods came in season, countless streams poured into the Yellow River. The waters spread vast and wide; between the two banks and the islets, one could not tell ox from horse at a distance. He Bo, god of the Yellow River, was delighted and thought that all the grandeur under heaven belonged to him alone. He followed the current eastward until he reached the North Sea. Looking east, he could not see where the water ended. He turned his face toward the boundless sea and said to Ru, god of the North Sea: “There is a saying that ‘he who knows many principles thinks no one can equal him’—that describes me. I once heard that someone belittled Confucius’s insight and looked down on Boyi’s integrity; at first I did not believe it. Now that I have seen your vastness, which has no end, if I had not come to you I would have been in danger of staying narrow forever and becoming a long-standing joke to those who understand the Great Dao.”

Ru of the North Sea said: “A frog in a well cannot be told about the sea, because it is confined by its dwelling. An insect of summer cannot be told about ice, because it is limited by its season. A man of narrow views cannot be told about the Great Dao, because he is bound by the teaching he received. Now you have left your riverbanks and seen the ocean; you know your own smallness—only then can one discuss the great principle with you. There is no body of water under heaven greater than the sea: the myriad streams flow in without cease, yet the sea does not overflow; the Weilu (the legendary outlet where the sea drains) discharges without stopping, yet the sea is not exhausted. Neither the change of spring and autumn nor flood and drought can alter it. Its volume exceeds that of the rivers beyond counting. Yet I never boast of this, because I merely take my place between heaven and earth and receive the breath of yin and yang. I stand within heaven and earth like a pebble or a sapling on a great mountain—I already feel myself small; how could I think myself grand?”

夫圣人之道浑合而一致其深不可测而其广不可穷用之所以不竭而积之所以不盈其余润可以济天下其末流可用为国家无有不容无有不至此圣人之道也及夫道散而不能兴世世衰而不能兴道诸子泛起浩然流荡此庄子所以有河伯欣然之言也夫河伯欣然者所以况诸子喜其道之得行也诸子虽喜其道之盛行安知有散而不能兴世世衰而不能兴道诸子泛起浩然流荡此庄子所以有河伯欣然之言也夫河伯欣然者所以况诸子喜其道之得行也诸子虽喜其道之盛行安知有圣人之道在焉此庄子所以有河伯东行而至于北海之言也然而圣人之道天下莫不宗也万物莫不由也冲而未尝盈用而未尝知自古以固存而治乱不变其所以过于诸子之道甚远矣而圣人未尝自其广深幽妙而独居其多此所以终始无穷也故曰天下之水莫大于海万川归之不知何时止而不盈尾闾泄之不知何时已而不虚春秋不变水旱不知此其过江河之流不可为量数而吾未尝以此自多者自以比形于天地而受气于阴阳吾在天地间犹小石小木之在大山也方存乎见少又奚以自多 计四海之在天地之间也不似礨空之在大泽乎计中国之在海内不似稊米之在太仓乎号物之数谓之万人处一焉人在大山也方存乎见少又奚以自多
Interpretation

The sage’s Dao is unified and whole from beginning to end, so deep it cannot be fathomed and so vast it cannot be exhausted. Draw on it and it does not run dry; gather it and it does not overflow. Its surplus of moisture is enough to rescue the world; its fine tributaries are enough to govern a state. Nothing is excluded; nothing lies beyond it—this is the sage’s Dao.

When the Dao is scattered, the age cannot be revived; when the age declines, the Dao cannot be revived either. Then the various schools (zhuzi) rise one after another and spread far and wide. Zhuangzi therefore wrote the River God’s (Hebo) words of glad self-satisfaction. The River God’s joy stands for how the schools delight in seeing their own teachings prevail. Though they are pleased that their doctrines spread widely, how could they know that the sage’s Dao is still there? Zhuangzi therefore also wrote of the River God going east to the Northern Sea (Beihai).

Yet the sage’s Dao is honored throughout the world; nothing fails to follow it. It is empty and yielding yet never overflows; it is used yet never noticed as being used. It has existed from the beginning; it does not change in order or in chaos. How far it surpasses the doctrines of the schools! The sage never boasts of breadth, depth, or subtlety, nor claims wealth for himself alone, and so can remain inexhaustible to the end.

Thus it is said: Of all waters under heaven, none is greater than the sea. Myriad rivers flow into it without cease, yet it is not full; the Weilu (terminal outlet, where the sea is said to drain away) discharges it without pause, yet it is not empty. Spring and autumn do not alter it; flood and drought do not affect it. Its volume exceeds the flow of rivers and streams beyond counting. Yet I never take myself to be vast because I compare my form to heaven and earth and receive my breath from yin and yang (the two complementary vital forces). Between heaven and earth I am like a pebble or a sapling on a great mountain—I already know how small I am; how could I think myself vast?

Consider: the four seas within heaven and earth are not like an ant hole (lei kong) in a great marsh? China within the four seas is not like a single grain of millet (ti mi) in the great granary (taicang)? We call the number of things “ten thousand,” and a person is only one of them. A person amid the mountains already feels small—how could he think himself vast?

计四海之在天地之间也不似礨空之在大泽乎计中国之在海内不似稊米之在太仓乎号物之数谓之万人处一焉人卒九州谷食之所生舟车之所通人处一焉此其比万物也不似毫末之在于马体乎五帝之所连三王之所争仁人之所忧任士之所劳尽此矣伯夷辞之以为名仲尼语之以为博此其自多也不似尔向之自多于水乎河伯曰然则吾大天地而小毫末可乎北海若曰否夫物量无穷时无止分无常终始无故是故大知观于远近故小而不寡大而不多知量无穷证向今故故遥而不闷掇而不跂知时无止察乎盈虚故得而不喜失而不忧知分之无常也明乎坦涂故生而不悦死而不祸知终始之不可故也计人之所知不若其所不知其生之时不若未不喜失而不忧知分之无常也明乎坦涂故生而不悦死而不祸知终始之不可故也计人之所知不若其所不知其生之时不若未生之时以其至小求穷其至大之域是故迷乱而不能自得也由此观之又何以知毫末之足以定至细之倪又何以知天地之足以穷至大之域河伯曰世之议者皆曰至精无形至大不可围是信情乎北海若曰夫自细视大者不尽自大视细者不明
Interpretation

The four seas sit within heaven and earth—are they not like a tiny hollow in a great marsh? China (here meaning the Central Plains) sits within the four seas—is it not like a single grain of millet in the Grand Granary? The kinds of things are so many that we call them by the ten-thousands, yet a person is only one among them; people spread across the nine provinces, wherever grain grows and boats and carts can reach, and each person is again only one among that multitude. Compare a person to the ten-thousand things—is he not like the tip of a hair on a horse’s hide?

The Five Emperors succeeded one another, the Three Kings contended for power, benevolent people worried, and capable men who took on affairs toiled—all of that falls within this same scope. Boyi declined the throne to win a name; Zhongni (Confucius) talked about such things to display his learning. In taking pride in themselves thus, were they not like you earlier, facing the river and thinking yourself vast?

The River God (He Bo) said: Then may I take heaven and earth as great and the tip of a hair as small—is that acceptable?

The Lord of the Northern Sea (Beihai Ruo) said: It is not acceptable. The number of things has no end; time has no stopping point; the boundary between gain and loss is not fixed; and ending and beginning have no constant cause. Therefore the person of great wisdom (da zhi) contemplates near and far: the small he does not treat as too little, the large he does not treat as too much—this is understanding that quantity is inexhaustible. He verifies past and present: the distant does not bore him, the close at hand he does not stretch on tiptoe to grasp—this is understanding that time never stops. He discerns fullness and emptiness: gaining brings no joy, losing brings no grief—this is understanding that the line between gain and loss is not fixed. He sees that life and death are like a level road (tantu): living does not delight him for that reason, dying he does not treat as disaster—this is understanding that ending and beginning cannot be held to fixed causes. What people know falls short of what they do not know; the time they are alive falls short of the time before they were born. With one’s extremely narrow understanding to exhaust an extremely vast domain—thus one is confused and disoriented and cannot find satisfaction in oneself. Seen in this light, on what basis can one know that the tip of a hair suffices to mark the boundary of what is most minute (ni)? On what basis can one know that heaven and earth suffice to exhaust the greatest extent?

The River God said: People who discuss such matters in the world say that what is most subtle has no form and what is most huge cannot be measured—is that really so?

The Lord of the Northern Sea said: Look at the huge from the tiny and you cannot see to the end; look at the tiny from the huge and you cannot make it out clearly.

夫用明而察秋毫则蔽于秋毫而见于邱山不尽也注目而观邱山则蔽于邱山而见于秋毫不明也故曰自细视大者不尽自大视细者不明此皆见其所见而所见有不及视其所视而所视有所遗也岂若藏其明乎若是则万物了然见之矣 夫精小之微也垺大之殷也故异便此势之不明此皆见其所见而所见有不及视其所视而所视有所遗也岂若藏其明乎若是则万物了然见之矣 夫精小之微也垺大之殷也故异便此势之有也夫精粗者期于有形者也无形者数之所不能分也不可围者数之所不能穷也可以言论者物之粗也可以意致者物之精也言之所不能论意之所不能察致者不期精粗焉 精者粗之细粗者精之迹由未离于形质也故曰夫精粗者期于有形者也惟其无形则巧历不能计惟其不可围则至明不能度寂然深妙而心得之者则精粗两忘矣此北海若语道之极致也故曰无形者数之所不能分不可围者数之所不能穷也又曰言之所不能论意之所不能察致者不期精粗焉 是故大人之行不出乎害人不多仁恩动不为利不贱不能穷也又曰言之所不能论意之所不能察致者不期精粗焉
Interpretation

If the eyes fix solely on examining the finest autumn down—the newly grown filaments of autumn, a metaphor for the tiniest things—they are blocked by that down, and the great hills are not seen whole. If the eyes fix on the great hills, they are blocked by those hills, and the finest down cannot be seen clearly. Thus it is said: viewing the large from the small, one cannot see it all; viewing the small from the large, one cannot see it clearly. Both cases are merely seeing what one sees, and what is seen still has places it does not reach; merely attending to what one attends to, and what is viewed still has omissions. How does that compare with storing away bright discernment—relying not on cleverness to make distinctions? When one can do this, the myriad things all stand clear before the eyes.

“Jing” (essence, the refined) is what is finer still within the small; “vast extent” is what is more expansive still within the great. Each has what suits it, and that is precisely the situation in which one cannot see all or see clearly. Likewise, only seeing what one sees and only viewing what one views still leaves what is not reached and what is missed; better to hide bright discernment, and the myriad things become plain to see.

Both refinement and coarseness still limit themselves to what has form. What has no form cannot be divided by number; what cannot be bounded cannot be exhausted by number. What can be talked about in words is the coarse side of things; what can be apprehended in thought is the subtle side of things. What words cannot discuss and mind cannot discern no longer belongs to refinement or coarseness.

Refinement is the finer end of the coarse; coarseness is the trace left by refinement. Neither leaves behind form and quality, so refinement and coarseness are spoken of only with regard to what has form. Because there is no form, even a skilled reckoner cannot calculate it; because it cannot be bounded, even the keenest sight cannot measure it. Silent, deep, and obtained from the heart itself—there refinement and coarseness are forgotten together. This is the utmost that Bei He Ru (the god of the northern sea) spoke of the Dao. Thus it is said: what has no form, number cannot divide; what cannot be bounded, number cannot exhaust. It is also said: what speech cannot discuss and mind cannot discern does not fall within refinement or coarseness.

Therefore the great person in action does not proceed from harming others, nor treats lavish benevolence as precious; in movement does not act for profit, does not despise those who cannot keep up—and such conduct cannot be exhausted. It is also said: what speech cannot discuss and mind cannot discern does not belong to refinement or coarseness.

是故大人之行不出乎害人不多仁恩动不为利不贱门货财弗争不多辞让事焉不借人不多食乎力不贱贪污行殊乎俗不多辟异为在从众不贱佞謟世之爵禄不足以为劝戮耻不足以为辱知是非之不可为分细大之不可为倪闻曰道人不闻至德不得大人无已约分之至也河伯曰若物之外若物之内恶至而倪贵贱恶至而倪小大北海若曰以道观之物无贵贱以物观之自贵而相贱以俗观之贵贱不在已以差观之因其所大而大之则万物莫不大因其所小而小之则万物莫不小知天地之为稊米也知毫末之为丘山也则差数睹矣 天下之俗惑诸子之道而有我物莫不大因其所小而小之则万物莫不小知天地之为稊米也知毫末之为丘山也则差数睹矣 天下之俗惑诸子之道而有我者也有我则有彼我小大之辩而不能齐谐也庄子至此而托北海若之言而寓其齐谐之意也夫天下之物同出于道而其不同者形质小大之殊也故天地大于邱山邱山大于毫末也以道达观则均为物耳安知邱山不大于天地而毫末不大于邱山又何较其形质之小大而分彼我小大之辩乎故曰知天地之为稊米也知毫末之为邱山也 以功观之因其所有而有之则万物莫不有因其所无而无之则万物莫不无知东西之相反而不可以相无则功分定矣以趣观之因其所然而然之则万物莫不然因为邱山也
Interpretation

In the conduct of one who has attained the Dao, he does not set out to harm others, nor does he treat lavish kindness and favor as a mark of excellence; in action he does not chase profit, yet he does not scorn gatekeepers and servants; he do not wrangle over goods, yet he does not overdo refusal and yielding; in his work he does not lean on others, nor is he greedy for living by sheer force, yet he does not look down on the money-minded; his way of life differs from the world’s, yet he does not play at being odd on purpose; he goes along with the crowd in what he does, yet he does not lightly honor fawning and sycophancy. Ranks and salaries in the world are not enough to win him, punishment and shame are not enough to break him. He knows that right and wrong cannot be cut apart cleanly, and that large and small cannot be drawn with fixed lines. It is said: one who has attained the Dao does not chase fame, the highest De does not chase gain, the truly great do not fix on “me.” That is what it means to hold one’s place to the utmost limit.

The River God (Hebo) asked: With things—outside and inside—what finally fixes what is noble or base, great or small? The North Sea Lord (Beihai Ruo) said: From the Dao, things have no noble or base; from each thing’s own view, each treats itself as noble and the other as base; from common custom, noble and base are not settled by oneself alone. From the angle of difference: call it large from the side of largeness, and nothing is not large; call it small from the side of smallness, and nothing is not small. Once you see that Heaven and Earth may be a single grain of millet and the tip of a downy hair may be a hill, the reckoning of relative difference is clear.

Worldly habits are led astray by the teachings of the various masters, and so people cling to “there is a me.” Once there is a me, there is other versus me, small versus large, and differences cannot be leveled into sameness. Here Zhuangzi, through Beihai Ruo’s words, carries the idea of making all things equal and one. Everything comes from the Dao; they differ only in form and scale—Heaven and Earth are larger than hills, hills larger than the finest tip. Seen through the Dao, each is equally one thing. Who can prove hills are not larger than Heaven and Earth, or the finest tip not larger than hills? Why insist on comparing shapes and sizes and splitting other from me, small from large? Hence: know that Heaven and Earth may be one grain of millet, and the finest tip may be a hill.

From function: from the side of “has,” everything has—nothing lacks having; from the side of “has not,” everything lacks—nothing lacks lacking. Know that east and west oppose each other yet cannot be without each other, and the line of functional division is set. From orientation: from what each takes as right, everything is right—nothing is not right.

以功观之因其所有而有之则万物莫不有因其所无而无之则万物莫不无知东西之相反而不可以相无则功分定矣以趣观之因其所然而然之则万物莫不然因其所非而非之则万物莫不非知尧桀之自然而相非则趣操睹矣昔者尧舜让而帝之哙让而绝汤武争而王白公争而灭由此观之争让之礼尧桀之行贵贱有时未可以为常也梁丽可以冲城而不可以窒穴言殊器也骐骥骅骝一日而驰千里捕鼠不如狸狌言殊技也鸱鸺夜撮蚤察毫末昼出瞠目而不见丘山言殊性也故曰盖师是而无非师治而无乱乎是未明天地之理万物之情骅骝一日而驰千里捕鼠不如狸狌言殊技也鸱鸺夜撮蚤察毫末昼出瞠目而不见丘山言殊性也故曰盖师是而无非师治而无乱乎是未明天地之理万物之情者也是犹师天而无地师阴而无阳其不可行明矣然且语而不舍非愚则诬也帝王殊禅三代殊继差其时逆其俗者谓之篡夫当其时顺其俗者谓之义之徒默默乎河伯汝恶知贵贱之门小大之家河伯曰然则我何为乎何不为乎吾辞受趣舍吾终奈河北海若曰以道观之何贵何贱是谓反衍无拘而志与道大蹇何少何多是谓谢施无一而行与道参差严乎若国之有君其无私德繇繇乎若祭之有社其无私福泛泛乎其若四方之无穷其无所畛域兼怀万物其孰承翼是谓无方万物一齐孰短孰长道无终始物有死生不恃其成一虚一满不位乎其形年不可举时不可止消息盈虚终则有始是所以语大义之方论畛域兼怀万物其孰承翼是谓无方万物一齐孰短孰长道无终始物有死生不恃其成一虚一满不位乎其形年不可举时不可止消息盈虚终则有始是所以语大义之方论万物之理也物之生也若骤若驰无动而不变无时而不移何为乎何不为乎夫固将自化河伯曰然则何贵于道邪北海若曰知道者必达于理达于理者必明于权明于权者不以物害己
Interpretation

From the perspective of function: if you affirm what each thing has, nothing is not "having"; if you affirm what each thing lacks, nothing is not "lacking." East and west oppose each other yet cannot do without each other—each side’s role and boundary is fixed in that way.

From the perspective of orientation: if you affirm what each takes as right, nothing is not affirmable; if you deny what each takes as wrong, nothing is not deniable. Once you see that Yao (the sage-king who abdicated in antiquity) and Jie (the last tyrant of Xia) each condemn the other according to their natures, people’s inclinations and commitments become clear.

Long ago Yao and Shun abdicated and became emperors; King Kuai of Yan (a Warring States ruler of Yan) abdicated and ruined his state. Tang of Shang and King Wu of Zhou won kingship through battle; Lord Bai Sheng (a Chu prince) fought for power and destroyed himself. So the rites of contention and yielding, and the conduct of Yao and Jie—their nobility and baseness shift with the age; they cannot be treated as fixed norms.

A massive beam can ram a city wall but cannot plug a small hole—tools differ. Qiji and Hualiu (fine steeds) can run a thousand li in a day yet are worse than wild cats and weasels at catching mice—skills differ. The owl catches fleas and sees fine hairs at night, yet by day stares and cannot see a hill—natures differ.

How then can one only imitate “yes” and reject “no,” only imitate “order” and reject “disorder”? That is not yet understanding heaven and earth’s principle and the real state of things. It is like only imitating heaven and rejecting earth, only imitating yin and rejecting yang—failure is obvious. To keep talking on and on is either folly or deliberate deceit.

The way emperors abdicate differs; how the Three Dynasties (Xia, Shang, Zhou) inherited the throne differed too. Whoever goes against the times and custom is called a usurper; whoever fits the time and follows custom is called one who accords with the Way. Be still, He Bo (the god of the Yellow River)! How would you know the gates of nobility and baseness, the divisions of large and small?

He Bo said: Then what should I do and not do, accept or refuse, approach or leave—how am I to decide?

Bei Hai Ruo (the god of the northern sea) said: Viewed through the Dao, there is neither nobility nor baseness—that is called fan yan (turning toward the opposite). Do not bind the mind until it runs far against the great Dao. There is neither few nor many—that is called xie shi (decline and bestowal alternating). Do not cling to one method until you fall out of step with the great Dao.

Stern like a ruler of a state, yet not partial to one’s own favor; gentle like the sheshen (earth god) in sacrifice, yet not partial to one’s own blessing; vast like the four directions without end or border. Embracing all things—who is specially sheltered? That is called not being confined to one place. Things are originally equal—who is short, who is long?

The Dao has no beginning or end; things have birth and death—do not rely on a moment’s success. Now empty, now full, not fixed in one form. Years do not stay; time does not stop. Waning, growing, filling, emptying—when one cycle ends, another begins. That is the gist of the great Dao and the account of how things are.

The growth and change of things is like horses galloping and chariots racing—no movement that is not change, no instant that is not shift. What to do, what not to do? They will change on their own.

He Bo said: If that is so, what is precious about the Dao?

Bei Hai Ruo said: One who knows the Dao must penetrate affairs; one who penetrates affairs must understand quan bian (flexible adaptation to circumstances); one who understands quan bian will not let outer things harm the self.

夫无所不通者知道也知道而不能外是者达理也不能外是而又能应变者明于权也能应变而岂以物而为累乎故形之所以常全也故曰知道者必达于理达于理者必明于权明于权者不以物害己故道所以为理权之体而权所以为理道之用不相须不能相济也 至德者火弗能水弗能溺寒暑弗能害禽兽弗能贼非谓其薄之也言察乎安危宁于祸福谨于去就莫之能害也 至德者所谓至德者火弗能水弗能溺寒暑弗能害禽兽弗能贼非谓其薄之也言察乎安危宁于祸福谨于去就莫之能害也 至德者所谓至人也至人与物无迕而物莫能伤水火寒暑禽兽岂能加害欤故曰至德者火弗能水弗能溺寒暑弗能害禽兽弗能贼然而至人者非必能使水火寒暑禽兽之不害己也盖任之自然而不轻犯也故曰非谓其薄之也来则不避而去则不冒也故曰察乎安危待之以诚而安于生死也故曰宁于祸福与之俱出俱入而不逆理也故曰谨于去就
Interpretation

One who understands all things is one who understands the Dao—the root of the ten thousand things. One who understands the Dao and does not stray from it understands li, the inherent order of things. One who neither strays from this nor fails to respond as circumstances change understands quan—the timely, situational flexibility of judgment. Able to adapt in this way, how could one be dragged about by external things? Thus the body is often kept whole. Therefore it is said: those who understand the Dao surely penetrate li; those who penetrate li surely understand quan; those who understand quan do not let external things harm themselves. The Dao is the substance of li and quan; quan is the functioning of li and the Dao. If the two do not rely on each other, neither can be fully realized.

What is called a person of “supreme virtue” (zhide) cannot be burned by fire, drowned by water, injured by cold or heat, or harmed by birds and beasts. This is not because they deliberately court such dangers, but because they see clearly what is safe and what is perilous, rest easy in fortune and misfortune, and are very careful about advancing, retreating, going, and staying—so nothing can harm them.

The person of supreme virtue is the “perfect person” (zhiren). The perfect person does not clash with external things, and external things cannot harm them—how then could water, fire, cold, heat, or beasts do injury? Thus it is said that the person of supreme virtue cannot be burned by fire, drowned by water, harmed by cold or heat, or injured by beasts. Yet the perfect person does not necessarily make fire, water, cold, heat, or beasts unable to harm them; they simply accord with nature and do not lightly give offense. So this does not mean they go up to danger on purpose: when crisis comes they do not flee in panic; when it is time to leave they do not rashly provoke—that is seeing safety and danger. Facing one another with sincerity and resting in life and death is keeping peace amid fortune and misfortune. Going out and in with things without violating the way things are is being careful about deciding to stay or go.

故曰天在内人在外德在乎天知天人之行本乎天位乎得蹢防而屈伸反要而语极曰何谓天何谓人北海若曰牛马四足是谓天落马首穿牛鼻是谓人故曰无以人灭天无以故灭命无以得殉名谨守而勿失是谓反其真防怜蚿蚿怜蛇蛇怜风风怜目目怜心防谓蚿曰吾以曰牛马四足是谓天落马首穿牛鼻是谓人故曰无以人灭天无以故灭命无以得殉名谨守而勿失是谓反其真防怜蚿蚿怜蛇蛇怜风风怜目目怜心防谓蚿曰吾以一足趻踔而行予无如矣今子之使众足独奈何蚿曰不然子不见夫唾者乎喷则大者如珠小者如雾杂而下者不可胜数也今予动吾天机而不知其所以然蚿谓蛇曰吾以众足行而不及子之无足何也蛇曰夫天机之所动何可易邪吾安用足哉蛇谓风曰予动吾脊胁而行则有似也今子然起于北海然入于南海而似无有何也风曰然予然起于北海而入于南海也然而指我则胜我防我亦胜我虽然夫折大木蜚大屋者唯我能也故以众小不胜为大胜也为大胜者唯圣人能之孔子游于匡宋人围之数匝而歌不辍子路入见曰何夫子之娱也孔子曰来吾语汝我讳穷乆矣而不免命也求通乆矣而不得时也当尧舜而天下无穷人非知得也当桀纣而天下无通人非知失也时势适然讳穷乆矣而不免命也求通乆矣而不得时也当尧舜而天下无穷人非知得也当桀纣而天下无通人非知失也时势适然夫水行不避蛟龙者渔父之勇也陆行不避兕虎者猎夫之勇也白刃交于前视死若生者烈士之勇也知穷之有命知通之有时临大难而不惧者圣人之勇也由处矣吾命有所制矣无几何将甲者进辞曰以为阳虎也故围之今非也请辞而退公孙龙问于魏牟曰龙少学先生之道长而明仁义之行合同异离坚白然不然可不可困百家之知穷众口之辩吾自以为至达已今吾闻庄子之言茫然异之不知论之不及与知之弗若与今吾无所开吾喙敢问其方公子牟隐机太息仰天而笑曰子独不闻夫埳井之鼃乎谓东海之鳖曰吾乐与吾跳梁乎井干之上入休乎缺甃之崖赴水方公子牟隐机太息仰天而笑曰子独不闻夫埳井之鼃乎谓东海之鳖曰吾乐与吾跳梁乎井干之上入休乎缺甃之崖赴水则接腋持颐蹶泥则没足灭跗还虷蟹与科斗莫吾能若也且夫擅一壑之水而跨跱埳井之乐此亦至矣夫子奚不时来入观乎东海之鳖左足未入而右已絷矣于是逡廵而却告之海曰夫千里之远不足以举其大千仞之高不足以极其深禹之时十年九潦而水弗为加益汤之时八年七旱而崖不为加损夫不为顷乆推移不以多少进退者此亦东海之大乐也于是埳井之鼃闻之适适然惊规规然自失也且夫知不知是非之竟而犹欲观于庄子之言是犹使蚊负山商蚷驰河也必不胜任矣且夫知不知论极妙之言而自适一时之利者是非埳井之鼃与且欲观于庄子之言是犹使蚊负山商蚷驰河也必不胜任矣且夫知不知论极妙之言而自适一时之利者是非埳井之鼃与且彼方跐黄泉而登大皇无南无北奭然四解沦于不测无东无西始于冥反于大通子乃规规然而求之以察索之以辩是直用管窥天用锥指地也不亦小乎子徃矣且子独不闻夫寿陵余子之学行于邯郸与未得国能又失其故行矣直匍匐而归耳今子不去将忘子之故失子之业公孙龙口呿而不合舌举而不下乃逸而走庄子钓于濮水楚王使大夫二人徃先焉曰愿以境内累矣庄子持竿不顾曰吾闻楚有神死已三千岁矣王巾笥而藏之庙堂之上此者宁其死为留骨而贵乎宁其生而曳尾于涂中乎二大夫曰宁生而曳尾于涂中庄子曰徃矣吾将曳尾于涂中惠子相梁庄子徃见之或谓惠子曰庄子来欲代子相于是惠子恐搜于国中三日三夜庄子生而曳尾于涂中乎二大夫曰宁生而曳尾于涂中庄子曰徃矣吾将曳尾于涂中惠子相梁庄子徃见之或谓惠子曰庄子来欲代子相于是惠子恐搜于国中三日三夜庄子徃见之曰南方有鸟其名鹓雏子知之乎夫鹓雏发于南海而飞于北海非梧桐不止非练实不食非醴泉不饮于是鸱得腐鼠鹓雏过之仰而视之曰吓今子欲以子之梁国而吓我邪庄子与惠子游于濠梁之上庄子曰鲦鱼出游从容是鱼乐也惠子曰子非鱼安知鱼之乐庄子曰子非我安知我不知鱼之乐惠子曰我非子固不知子矣子固非鱼也子之不知鱼之乐全矣庄子曰请循其本子曰汝安知鱼乐云者既已知吾知之而问我我知之濠上也
Interpretation

Therefore, nature is hidden within, while artificial action shows on the outside; true De (Virtue/Power) takes its root in what is natural. To understand how Heaven and the human each ought to act, one must take the natural as foundation, rest content in one’s allotted place, advance and retreat, bend and stretch in fitting ways, return to what is essential—only then does speech reach its limit.

The god of the He River asked: What is Heaven, and what is the human? Beihuo Ru (the god of the northern sea) said: Oxen and horses are born with four legs—that is natural; putting a halter on a horse and a nose ring on an ox—that is artificial. So do not use human contrivance to destroy natural endowment, do not use deliberate cleverness to ruin the fate that belongs to you by nature, and do not sacrifice what you inherently possess for the sake of reputation. Carefully guard these and do not let them slip away—that is called returning to the genuine.

Kui (a one-legged creature of legend) envied the many-footed worm; the worm envied the snake; the snake envied the wind; the wind envied the eye; the eye envied the mind. Kui said to the worm: I hop on one foot and already cannot manage; you deploy so many feet—how do you do it? The worm said: It is not like that. Have you never seen someone sneeze? What flies out—large like pearls, small like mist—falls in a chaotic shower beyond counting. I only set my tianji (natural capacity) in motion and do not know why it works. The worm said to the snake: I walk on many feet yet still cannot keep up with you who have none—why? The snake said: When tianji moves, how can it be swapped? I have no use for feet. The snake said to the wind: I twist my back and ribs to go along and still seem to have a body; you whuff from the northern sea and whuff into the southern sea as if you had nothing at all—why? The wind said: So it is. I blow from the northern sea to the southern sea, yet a person can defeat me by pointing a finger, defeat me by stepping on me. Even so, only I can snap great trees and tear off roofs. Thus many small “non-victories” add up to one great victory—and only the sage can achieve that kind of great victory.

Confucius traveled to the state of Kuang; the people of Song hemmed him in layer upon layer, yet he kept playing his zither and singing. Zilu went in and asked: Master, why are you still so at ease? Confucius said: Come—I will tell you. I have long shunned distress, yet cannot escape it—that is ming (fate). I have long sought success, yet cannot obtain it—that is shi (the times). In the age of Yao and Shun no one in the world was in distress—not because their cleverness won that; in the age of Jie and Zhou no one in the world succeeded—not because their cleverness lost that. It was the force of the times. To walk on water without fear of dragons is the courage of a fisherman; to walk on land without fear of rhinoceros or tiger is the courage of a hunter; when naked blades meet before you, to treat death like life is the courage of one who dies for principle. To know that distress has its fate and success its season, and to face great peril without fear—that is the courage of the sage. Zilu, settle down; my fate has its limit. Before long the man leading armed men came forward to apologize: We thought you were Yang Hu—that is why we surrounded you; now we know you are not—please let us withdraw.

Gongsun Long asked Wei Mou: In youth I studied the Way of the former kings; when grown I understood humane and righteous conduct. I could merge sameness and difference, separate hard and white, call the not-so so and the impossible possible; I tied up the cleverness of the hundred schools and stumped the eloquence of the crowd—I thought myself most penetrating. Now, having heard Zhuangzi’s words, I feel dazed and strange, unsure whether my discourse falls short or my insight does not match his. I cannot even open my mouth—what is the reason? The prince leaned on his armrest, sighed, and laughed up at the sky: Have you not heard of the frog in the shallow well? It said to the turtle from the eastern sea: How happy I am! I hop on the well curb, rest on broken brick ledges; I jump into the water and it lifts my armpits and chin; I step in mud and it covers my feet to the instep. Looking back at mosquito larvae, crabs, and tadpoles in the well, none can compare with me. Moreover I alone possess this pool, legs spread in the shallow well—this joy has reached its peak. Why not come in often and see? The eastern-sea turtle had not yet put its left foot in when its right knee was already stuck. So it backed out and told the frog about the sea: A distance of a thousand li cannot express its vastness; a depth of a thousand ren cannot exhaust it. In Yu the Great’s time there were nine floods in ten years, yet the sea did not grow; in Tang’s time there were seven droughts in eight years, yet the shore did not shrink. It does not change with long or short time, does not advance or retreat with more or less rain—that is the great joy of the eastern sea. When the well frog heard this, it was alarmed and lost, empty and confused.

Your wisdom still cannot fix the boundary between right and wrong, yet you want to spy on Zhuangzi’s discourse—that is like asking a mosquito to carry a mountain or a centipede to race a river: it surely cannot manage. Wisdom not enough to discuss the subtlest Way, yet grasping only momentary petty comfort—is that not the frog in the shallow well? On Zhuangzi’s side: feet tread the yellow springs below, head climbs the azure sky above; no south or north, suddenly open on all sides, plunging into the immeasurable; no east or west, setting out from the dark and abstruse, returning to the great thoroughfare. Yet you cautiously use scrutiny to seek and debate to probe—as if viewing heaven through a bamboo tube or pointing at earth with an awl—is that not too small? Be off! Have you not heard of the youth of Shouling who went to Handan to learn how to walk? Before he learned the capital’s gait, he forgot how he used to walk and had to crawl home. If you do not leave now, you will forget your original skill and lose your former learning. Gongsun Long’s mouth would not close, his tongue would not stay put—and he fled.

Zhuangzi was fishing on the bank of the Pu River. The king of Chu sent two grandees ahead to convey his meaning: We wish to burden you, sir, with affairs within our borders. Zhuangzi held his rod, did not turn his head, and said: I have heard that in Chu there is a sacred turtle, dead already three thousand years, wrapped in cloth and boxed in bamboo, kept in the hall of the ancestral temple. Would that turtle rather die and leave its shell to be treasured, or rather live dragging its tail in the mud? The two grandees said: Rather live dragging its tail in the mud. Zhuangzi said: Please go back—I will drag my tail in the mud.

When Huizi was prime minister in the state of Liang, Zhuangzi went to see him. Someone told Huizi: Zhuangzi has come because he wants to replace you as prime minister. Huizi was afraid and searched the state for three days and three nights. Zhuangzi came to him and said: In the south there is a bird called yuanchu (a phoenix-like bird)—do you know it? Yuanchu flies from the southern sea toward the northern sea; it will not roost except on the parasol tree, will not eat except bamboo fruit, will not drink except from sweet springs. Meanwhile an owl got a rotten rat; seeing yuanchu pass, it looked up and glared and cried “sha!” Are you now trying to “sha” me with your state of Liang?

Zhuangzi and Huizi were strolling on the bridge over the Hao River. Zhuangzi said: The minnows swim out at ease—that is the fish’s joy. Huizi said: You are not a fish—how do you know the fish are joyful? Zhuangzi said: You are not me—how do you know I do not know the fish are joyful? Huizi said: I am not you, so I indeed do not know you; you are originally not a fish—you do not know the fish’s joy. That is fully settled. Zhuangzi said: Please return to the start. When you said “how do you know the fish are joyful,” you already knew I knew and came to ask me. I knew it from the bridge over the Hao River.

庄子作此篇疾世俗自异于物而中寓其齐谐之意及其篇终而复言其知鱼之乐与齐物终于梦为蝴蝶之意同读庄子者宜求庄子之意也 南华真经新传卷八 钦定四库全书 南华真经新传卷九 宋 王雱 撰 至乐篇 夫能去异学守正性忘已齐物终于梦为蝴蝶之意同读庄子者宜求庄子之意也 南华真经新传卷八 钦定四库全书 南华真经新传卷九 宋 王雱 撰 至乐篇 夫能去异学守正性忘已而与物齐谐者则死生富贵穷达寿夭不能介虿于胸中怡然逍遥于天地之间矣庄子因而作至乐篇
Interpretation

Zhuangzi wrote this chapter out of grief that people in the world constantly set themselves apart from external things; within it he entrusted the meaning of “harmony with all things”—that is, being equal and at one with the myriad things. At the end he also says he knows the fish’s joy (watching fish from above the Hao, debating with Huizi whether fish are happy on their own); this serves the same purpose as the closing of “On the Equality of Things,” where he dreams of becoming a butterfly (and on waking cannot tell whether Zhuang Zhou dreamed the butterfly or the butterfly dreamed Zhuang Zhou). Readers of Zhuangzi should seek Zhuangzi’s own original intent.

The passage above comes from New Commentary on the Nanhua Zhenjing (Nanhua Zhenjing is the honorific title for Zhuangzi; “new commentary” means a newly written exegesis), in volumes eight and nine, preserved in the Complete Library of the Four Treasures. Volume nine was composed by Wang Bi of the Song dynasty, explaining the “Ultimate Joy” chapter (which discusses what truly counts as the highest joy).

One who can abandon heterodox learning, guard the nature of original authenticity, forget the self, and harmonize equally with the myriad things—such that death and life, wealth and rank, success and failure, long life and early death cannot lodge in the breast like a thorn or a scorpion’s sting—may rest content and wander freely between Heaven and Earth. For this reason Zhuangzi wrote the “Ultimate Joy” chapter.

天下有至乐无有哉有可以活身者无有哉今奚为奚据奚避奚处奚就奚去奚乐奚恶夫天下之所尊者富贵寿善也所乐者身安厚味美服好色音声也所下者贫贱夭恶也所苦者身不得安逸口不得厚味形不得美服目不得好色耳不得音声若不得者则大忧以惧其为形也亦愚哉夫富者苦身疾作多积财而不得尽用其为形也亦外矣夫贵者夜以继日思虑善否其为形也亦则大忧以惧其为形也亦愚哉夫富者苦身疾作多积财而不得尽用其为形也亦外矣夫贵者夜以继日思虑善否其为形也亦疏矣人之生也与忧俱生寿者惛惛久忧不死何之苦也其为形也亦远矣烈士为天下见善矣未足以活身吾未知善之诚善邪诚不善邪若以为善矣不足活身以为不善矣足以活人故曰忠諌不蹲循勿争故夫子胥争之以残其形不争名亦不成诚有善无有哉今俗之所为与其所乐吾又未知乐之果乐邪果不乐邪吾观夫俗之所乐举群趣者誙誙然如将不得已而皆曰乐者吾未之乐也亦未之不乐也果有乐无有哉吾以无为诚乐矣又俗之所大苦也
Interpretation

Is there ultimately any supreme happiness in the world? Is there any way to preserve one’s life? What ought one do now, and on what ought one rely? What ought one avoid, and where ought one settle? What ought one approach and what leave behind—and what count as joy, and what as aversion?

What people under heaven honor is wealth, rank, long life, and a fine reputation. What they delight in is bodily ease, rich food, fine clothes, beautiful colors, and pleasing music. What they look down on is poverty, low status, a short life, and a bad name. What they find painful is when the body is not at ease, the mouth tastes nothing fine, the body wears nothing splendid, the eyes see no beauty, and the ears hear no sound. When they cannot obtain these things, they are greatly worried and afraid. To preserve the body in this way is deeply confused.

The rich toil the body and hurry in anxious work, amassing much property yet unable to use it all themselves—treating the body by putting what preserves it outside the body. The noble think day and night about whether affairs are good or bad—treating the body in a way equally far from true nourishment. From birth one arrives together with worry. Those who live long drift in dullness, worrying for ages yet unable to die—how painful that is! To preserve the body like that is even further from nourishing life.

Those who fiercely uphold principle and sacrifice themselves are regarded under heaven as good, yet they may still fail to preserve their own lives. I do not know whether that “good” is truly good or not really good. If it is taken as good, it is not enough to preserve oneself; if it is taken as not good, it can yet save others. Therefore it is said: when loyal, straight remonstrance is not heeded, step back and comply—do not press the contention. Wu Zixu (the great officer of Wu in the Spring and Autumn period) harmed his own body through contentious remonstrance; had he not contended, his name would not have been made. Whether this so-called good exists or not is hard to say.

As for what the world now does and what it likes, I likewise do not know whether that is happiness or not happiness. I see what the world pursues as joy: the multitude rushes together, competing eagerly as if unable to stop, and all call this happiness. I do not simply call it happiness, nor do I flatly call it unhappiness. Is happiness there or not? I hold that Wuwei (non-action)—according with nature and not forcing arbitrary deeds—is true happiness, and that is precisely what the world finds most bitter.

夫万物不乐邪果不乐邪吾观夫俗之所乐举群趣者誙誙然如将不得已而皆曰乐者吾未之乐也亦未之不乐也果有乐无有哉吾以无为诚乐矣又俗之所大苦也 夫万物不足以忧者至乐也至乐者非由自外而入也非由感音而生也出于忘己无为而天下不能知之也故曰天下有至乐无有哉惟能忘己无为则至乐自有有至乐则可以全身身全而岂为无乐欤故曰有可以活身者无有哉然而天下之世俗不知至乐之所出徒以富贵寿善衣食声色之备为其乐故得之则劳形丧生耽之而不悟失之则刻意伤生求之而不止是为大惑而已矣安知至乐之其乐也内为乐之其乐也外乎此庄子所以有为形亦愚亦外亦防亦远之言矣 故曰至乐无乐至誉无誉天下是非果未可定也虽然无为可以定是非至乐活身唯无为几存请尝试言之天无为以之清地无为以之宁故两无为相合万物皆化芒乎曰至乐无乐至誉无誉天下是非果未可定也虽然无为可以定是非至乐活身唯无为几存请尝试言之天无为以之清地无为以之宁故两无为相合万物皆化芒乎芴乎而无从出乎芴乎芒乎而无有象乎万物职职皆从无为殖故曰天地无为也而无不为也人也孰能得无为哉
Interpretation

Nothing in the world is worth enough to cause worry—this is supreme joy (the highest joy). Supreme joy does not enter from outside, nor does it arise because one hears sounds; it comes from forgetting oneself and achieving Wuwei (non-action, not forcing affairs but aligning with nature), so that people under heaven barely notice it. Thus it is said: Is there supreme joy in the world? Only when one can forget the self and practice Wuwei does supreme joy appear on its own. When supreme joy is present, the body can be preserved; when the body is preserved, how could there be no joy? So again it is asked: Is there any way truly to nourish life?

Yet people in the world do not know where supreme joy comes from. They take wealth and rank, long life, a fine name, ample food and clothing, music, and beautiful forms—all complete—as happiness. When they obtain these, they wear out the body and drain vitality, drowning in them without waking up; when they lose them, they pursue them deliberately and harm life, never stopping in their quest. This is great delusion. How could they know that the joy of supreme joy lies within the heart, while the joy of worldly pleasures lies in external things? Zhuangzi therefore said that what people do for the sake of the body is sometimes foolish, sometimes spent on what is outside the person, sometimes guarded against on every side, and sometimes moves further away from preserving life.

Thus it is said: Supreme joy is not treating joy as joy; supreme reputation is not treating reputation as reputation. Right and wrong in the world indeed cannot yet be settled; even so, Wuwei can be used to settle right and wrong. Supreme joy and nourishing life—only Wuwei comes close to preserving them. Try to explain the principle: Heaven is clear through Wuwei, earth is at peace through Wuwei; when these two Wuwei join, the myriad things are all born and transformed. Dim and indistinct—one cannot see where they come from; vague and hazy—one cannot see any fixed form. The myriad things flourish in abundance, all gestated from Wuwei. Therefore it is said: Heaven and earth seem without action, yet nothing fails to be accomplished. Among human beings, who can truly reach Wuwei?

至乐生于无为无为则非有乐也故曰至乐无乐至誉出于难名难名则非为有誉也故曰至誉无誉然而无为者合于天地之道也天地无为而任物之生成安有劳苦之困欤此其所以为乐之至也人能无为则亦为乐之至人安得于无为乎故曰天无为以之清地无为以之宁故两无为以为乐之至也人能无为则亦为乐之至人安得于无为乎故曰天无为以之清地无为以之宁故两无为相合万物皆化又曰人也孰得无为哉此庄子讥于世俗也 庄子妻死惠子吊之庄子则方箕踞鼓盆而歌惠子曰与人居长子老身死不哭亦足矣又鼓盆而歌不亦甚乎庄子曰不然是其始死也我独何能无槩然察其始而本无生非徒无生也而本无形非徒无形也而本无气杂乎芒芴之间变而有气气变而有形形变而有生今又变而之死是相与为春秋冬夏四时行也人且偃然寝于巨室而我噭噭然随而哭之自而有形形变而有生今又变而之死是相与为春秋冬夏四时行也人且偃然寝于巨室而我噭噭然随而哭之自以为不通乎命故止也 夫至人以生死为徃来故生不喜其成而死不哀其毁庄子妻死而箕踞鼓盆而不哭者盖了于生死之常而至乐也与孟子反子琴张编曲鼓琴之意同
Interpretation

The highest joy arises from wuwei—following nature without forced effort. Wuwei is not a separate kind of pleasure, which is why it is said that “ultimate joy is joyless.” The highest reputation comes from what cannot be named; if it cannot be named, it is not reputation pursued on purpose, which is why it is said that “ultimate reputation is reputationless.” Such wuwei accords with the way of Heaven and Earth. Heaven and Earth do nothing deliberate—they only let the ten thousand things arise on their own—so where would exhaustion and hardship come from? That is why joy reaches its limit. If a person can be wuwei, that is ultimate joy; yet how can a person truly achieve wuwei? Hence it is said: Heaven is clear through wuwei, Earth is at peace through wuwei; when the two meet in wuwei, the ten thousand things are transformed and born—this is ultimate joy. It is also said: among people, who can really be wuwei? This is Zhuangzi’s mockery of the worldly.

When Zhuangzi’s wife died, Huizi (Hui Shi, Zhuangzi’s friend) came to offer condolences, but Zhuangzi was sitting with legs spread, casually drumming on a clay basin and singing. Huizi said: She lived with you, raised your children with you, and only died in old age—not weeping would be enough; drumming on a basin and singing—is that not going too far? Zhuangzi said: It is not so. When she had just died, how could I not feel grief? But tracing back to the beginning, there was originally no life; not only no life, there was originally no form; not only no form, there was originally no qi. Blended in the hazy undifferentiated chaos, change produced qi; qi changed and there was form; form changed and there was life; now again there is death—like the cycle of spring, summer, autumn, and winter. She has quietly gone to sleep in the great room (Heaven and Earth as one vast house). If I followed with wailing, I would show that I do not understand Heaven’s command, so I stopped weeping.

The perfected person (one who has realized the great Dao) treats life and death as coming and going: alive, he is not glad because he has taken form; dead, he is not sad because form is destroyed. When Zhuangzi’s wife died, he sat with legs spread, drummed the basin, and did not wail loudly—because he saw that life and death are the ordinary way of things, and thus reached ultimate joy. This matches the intent of Mengzi Fan and Ziqin Zhang (two figures in Zhuangzi who, after a friend’s death, one composed a song and one played the zither).

支离叔与滑介叔观于冥伯之丘昆仑之虚黄帝之所休俄而栁生其左肘其意蹶蹶然恶之支离叔曰子恶之乎滑介叔曰亡予何恶生者假借也假之而生生者尘垢也死生为昼夜且吾与子观化而化及我我又何恶焉 支离叔者言其形不正也滑介叔者言其心无智也此庄子制二子之名而寓其意夫形不正者能忘于形心无智者能忘于智忘形而化及我我又何恶焉 支离叔者言其形不正也滑介叔者言其心无智也此庄子制二子之名而寓其意夫形不正者能忘于形心无智者能忘于智忘形忘智则其于死生了然矣是以二子同游观于冥伯之丘昆仑之虚黄帝之所休而以观变化之妙也夫观变化者达观其生死之变也能达生死之变则外物安足累我乎虽柳生于滑介叔之左肘而亦不为之恶也故曰我又何恶若二子者可谓万物不足以忧之而内能全于至乐也
Interpretation

Zhi Lishu and Hua Jiejie were together at the mound of Mingbo (a dim, secluded hill), in the wilds of Kunlun, and at the place where the Yellow Emperor (the legendary ruler of high antiquity) had once rested, looking about and taking in the scene. The name Zhi Lishu indicates someone whose bodily form is crooked and incomplete; the name Hua Jiejie indicates someone whose mind harbors no clever contrivance. Zhuangzi devised these two names to carry a point: one who is bodily misshapen can forget the body; one without mental cleverness can forget cleverness.

Before long, a willow suddenly sprouted on Hua Jiejie’s left elbow. Disturbed in mind, he showed aversion. Zhi Lishu asked, “Do you loathe it?” Hua Jiejie said, “No. What is there for me to loathe? Life is only a temporary loan; the life that arises on the strength of that loan is like grime and dust. Death and life are like the alternation of night and day. Moreover, you and I came here in the first place to watch the transformations of the ten thousand things; now that transformation has fallen upon me, why should I loathe it?”

To forget body and cleverness is to see death and life with clarity and thorough understanding. The two traveled together to those places precisely in order to observe the subtlety of change. To watch change is to view the shifts of death and life with full penetration. When one can see through the changes of death and life, how can outer things entangle one? So when a willow grew on the left elbow, he did not loathe it for that reason. People like them—nothing among the ten thousand things is enough to cause worry, and within they can still preserve the highest joy.

庄子之楚见空髑髅髐然有形撽以马捶因而问之曰夫子贪生失理而为此乎将子有亡国之事斧之诛而为此乎将子有不善之行愧遗父母妻子之丑而为此乎将子有冻馁之患而为此乎将子之春秋故及此乎于是语卒援髑髅枕而卧夜半髑髅见梦曰子之谈者似辩士诸子所言皆生人之累也死则无此矣子欲闻死之说乎庄子曰然髑髅曰死无君于上无臣于下亦无四时之事从然以天地似辩士诸子所言皆生人之累也死则无此矣子欲闻死之说乎庄子曰然髑髅曰死无君于上无臣于下亦无四时之事从然以天地为春秋虽南面王乐不能过也庄子不信曰吾使司命复生子形为子骨肉肌肤反子父母妻子闾里知识子欲之乎髑髅深矉蹙额曰吾安能弃南面王乐而复为人间之劳乎 夫生者一气之暂聚死者一气之暂散生未必无为而死未必有为未必无为者至乐所以缺未必有为者至乐所以全此庄子所以有髑髅不弃南面之乐之言也夫六骸者寓之于身也生则随气而暂聚死则随气而暂散聚散皆非我之所有我又何自有而有我乎自有而有我则未能忘形也不能忘形则有为也有为而与物相靡刃则至乐安能内全欤有我又何自有而有我乎自有而有我则未能忘形也不能忘形则有为也有为而与物相靡刃则至乐安能内全欤此髑髅之不欲复为于人也
Interpretation

When Zhuangzi traveled to the state of Chu, he saw an empty skull whose dried bones still retained a human shape. He tapped it with his riding crop and asked: “Sir, did you end up like this because you clung to life and went against what is natural? Or because your state perished and you suffered execution by axe and halberd? Or because you behaved badly and brought shame on your parents, wife, and children? Or because you starved and froze? Or because your years simply ran out and you reached this point?”

Having spoken, he pulled the skull over and used it as a pillow to sleep. In the middle of the night, the skull appeared to him in a dream and said: “You talk like a debater. Everything you mentioned belongs to the burdens of the living; once dead, none of it remains. Would you like to hear what death is like?” Zhuangzi said he would. The skull said: “After death, there is no ruler above and no subject below, no seasonal duties—ease and freedom, with the turning of heaven and earth as one’s span of years. Even the joy of facing south and ruling as king cannot surpass this joy.”

Zhuangzi did not believe it and said: “If I ask Siming (the spirit who governs human lifespan) to restore your form, give you back flesh and bone and skin, and send you home to your parents, wife and children, neighbors and old friends—would you want that?” The skull frowned tightly and said: “How could I abandon the joy of facing south as king and go back among the living to suffer toil again?”

Life is the temporary gathering of one qi (vital energy); death is the temporary dispersal of one qi. Life does not necessarily mean wuwei (non-action), and death is not necessarily “having action.” Because life is not necessarily without action, supreme joy is incomplete; because death is not necessarily with action, supreme joy can be whole. This is what Zhuangzi meant by having the skull refuse to give up the joy of facing south as king.

The six bones—the head, trunk, and limbs—are only lodging places in a person. In life, qi temporarily gathers; in death, qi temporarily scatters. Gathering and scattering are not something “I” can possess—so why cling to the body and from that posit an “I”? Once one clings to having a self, one cannot forget the physical form; unable to forget form, one acts; acting leads to friction and wear with external things—how then can supreme joy be preserved within? That is why the skull was unwilling to return to human life.

颜渊东之齐孔子有忧色子贡下席而问曰小子敢问回东之齐夫子有忧色何邪孔子曰善哉汝问昔者管子有言丘甚善之曰禇小者不可以懐大绠短者不可以汲深夫若是者以为命有所成而形有所适也夫不可损益吾恐回与齐侯言尧舜黄帝之道而重以燧人神农之言彼将内求于已而不得不得则惑人惑则死且汝独不闻邪昔者海鸟止于鲁郊鲁侯御而觞之于庙奏九韶以为乐具太牢以为膳鸟乃视忧悲不敢食一脔不敢饮一杯三日而死此以己养养鸟也非以鸟养养鸟也夫以鸟养养鸟者宜栖之深林游之坛陆浮之江湖食之防防随行列而止委蛇而处彼唯人言之恶闻奚以夫譊譊为养养鸟也夫以鸟养养鸟者宜栖之深林游之坛陆浮之江湖食之防防随行列而止委蛇而处彼唯人言之恶闻奚以夫譊譊为乎咸池九韶之乐张之洞庭之野鸟闻之而飞兽闻之而走鱼闻之而下入人卒闻之相与还而观之鱼处水而生人处水而死彼必相与异其好恶故异也故先圣不一其能不同其事名止于实义设于适是之谓条达而福持
Interpretation

When Yan Hui was traveling east to the state of Qi, Confucius wore a troubled look on his face. Zigong rose from his seat and said, “Your student ventures to ask: Yan Hui is going to Qi—why does the Master look worried?”

Confucius said, “You ask well. Long ago Guan Zhong put it in a way I fully agree with: ‘A small pouch cannot hold something large; a short well rope cannot draw from deep water.’ The point is that each person’s allotted endowment has its own measure of fulfillment, and each bodily form has what suits it—neither can be casually stretched or cut down.

“I fear that Yan Hui will explain to the Duke of Qi the ways of Yao, Shun, and the Yellow Emperor, and add to them the words of Suiren and Shennong. The duke will search for these things inside himself and not find them; when he cannot find them he will be confused, and when a person is confused he invites ruin and death.

“Have you never heard? Once a sea bird alighted in the outskirts of Lu. The Duke of Lu welcomed it into the ancestral temple, offered wine, had the Jiushao played for its entertainment, and set out a tailao feast—beef, mutton, and pork in full—to feed it. The bird’s gaze was dull and it was grief-stricken; it dared not eat a morsel of meat or drink a cup of wine, and in three days it was dead. This was using the way one nourishes people to nourish a bird—not using the way one nourishes a bird to nourish a bird.

“To nourish a bird as a bird should be nourished, one should let it roost in deep forest, roam open plains, float on rivers and lakes, peck small fish, fly and rest with its flock, and settle at ease. It simply hates human voices—why must one clamor to disturb it!

“When the Xianchi and Jiushao are performed on the wilds of Dongting, birds hear them and fly away, beasts hear them and run, fish hear them and dive to the bottom; people hear them and crowd around to watch. Fish live in water; people die in water. Because what they like and dislike differ, their responses differ too.

“Therefore the ancient sages did not demand uniform talent or identical tasks. Names stop at what is real; principles are set where they fit. This is what is meant by flowing smoothly through and keeping fortune intact.”

燧人神农黄帝尧舜之道非圣人不足与言之齐侯中材之君也安足与言此道乎此颜回之齐而孔子所以有忧色也夫非圣人而与言圣人之道适使心之致惑也心惑则求之不止而伤生伤生则至于死而已至乐安得而全欤故曰惑则死安若顺其材而语之以中庸之道乎如此则不惑而生全生全则乐亦从而全此孔子所以有以鸟养鸟之喻也
Interpretation

The Great Dao of Suiren (the legendary emperor who taught fire-making by drilling wood), Shennong (the legendary emperor who taught farming), the Yellow Emperor, Yao, and Shun is not something one can discuss with anyone who is not a sage. Duke Jing of Qi was only a ruler of middling ability—how could he be fit to hear such a teaching? When Yan Hui was about to go to Qi, Confucius’s face showed worry for exactly this reason. To explain the sage’s Dao to someone who is not a sage only muddles his mind. Once the mind is muddled, pursuit will not stop, and life is harmed; when harm to life runs its course, there is only death—how then can the fullest joy be kept intact? Hence the saying: muddle leads to death. Better to follow his natural endowment and teach him the doctrine of the mean (the idea of neither leaning to extremes nor straying from one’s proper station). Then he will not be muddled, life can be preserved, and joy can be preserved as well. Confucius’s image of “nurturing a bird the way one nurtures a bird” (yining yang niao) is precisely this point.

Liezi (Lie Yukou), traveling on the road, stopped to eat by the wayside and saw a skull a century old. He parted the overgrown grass, pointed at it, and said: “Only you and I truly know the Great Dao, do we not?” To be free of such muddle is to preserve life and to preserve joy along with it. That is the same lesson as Confucius’s “nurturing a bird the way one nurtures a bird.”

列子行食于道从见百岁髑髅攓而指之曰唯予与汝知道乎如此则不惑而生全生全则乐亦从而全此孔子所以有以鸟养鸟之喻也 列子行食于道从见百岁髑髅攓而指之曰唯予与汝知而未尝死未尝生也若果养乎予果欢乎种有几得水则为得水土之际则为鼃蠙之衣生于陵屯则为陵舄陵舄得郁栖则为乌足乌足之根为跻螬其叶为蝴蝶蝴蝶胥也化而为虫生于灶下其状若脱其名为鸲掇鸲掇千日为鸟其名为干余骨干余骨之沫为斯弥斯弥为食酰颐辂生乎食酰黄軦生乎九猷瞀芮生乎腐蠸羊奚比乎不筍久竹生青宁青宁生程程生马马生人人又反入于机万物皆出于机皆入于机至人者防于生死之极而以生为不生以死为不死不生所以生不死所以存此列子所以见髑髅而有予与汝未尝死未尝生之言也夫未尝生者能生生未尝死者能化化故继言万物生成变化之无终也然万物生成变化之无终其出入皆由于机汝未尝死未尝生之言也夫未尝生者能生生未尝死者能化化故继言万物生成变化之无终也然万物生成变化之无终其出入皆由于机也机者道之妙本而万物安有名由乎故曰万物皆出于机皆入于机夫万物出入皆由于机也其生成岂不为乐乎此庄子言之于终也 达生篇 夫外形骸忘彼我全于无乐之至乐则其于性命之情尽之矣庄子因而作达生篇
Interpretation

On the road, Liezi ate as he walked. When he saw a skeleton a hundred years old, he pulled up a tuft of wild grass and pointed at it, saying: “Only you and I understand: there has never been death, and there has never been birth. Do you truly grieve over this? Do I truly rejoice over this?”

The transformation of species has its subtle threshold. Where water is gained, one becomes “ji” (the thread-fine life in water). Where water and earth meet, one becomes the mossy “wafu zhi yi.” On high ground one becomes “ling xi” (a plant like cheqian). When ling xi meets dung-soil, it turns into “wuzu”; the root of wuzu becomes a grub, its leaves a butterfly. Before long the butterfly changes again into an insect born under the stove, shaped like something just shed from a shell, called “quduo.” After a thousand days quduo becomes a bird called “ganyu gu.” The saliva of ganyu gu becomes “simi,” simi becomes the vinegar mite “shiyi.” “Yilu” arises from shiyi; “huangkui” from “jiuyou”; “maorui” from decayed “quan.” “yangxi” clings to old bamboo that no longer sprouts; long-standing bamboo gives birth to “qingning,” qingning to “cheng” (a beast), cheng to horse, horse to human, and the human returns again into ji. All things emerge from ji and return to ji.

The perfected person—one who has thoroughly attained the Way—keeps to the utmost limit of birth and death. He treats living as never having lived and dying as never having died. Only by “never having lived” does living truly count as living; only by “never having died” does enduring truly count as enduring. That is why Liezi, seeing the skeleton, could say that he and it had never died and never been born.

What has never been born is what lets the myriad things keep being born; what has never died is what lets the myriad things keep changing. Hence the account continues: the arising and transformation of things has no end. Yet this endless change, in going out and coming in, is entirely through ji. Ji is the subtle root of the Dao; how could the myriad things be produced merely by their various names? Therefore it is said: all things come forth from ji and enter into ji. Since their going out and coming in are all through ji, is their generation not joy? This is what Zhuangzi intends to clarify at the end of the chapter.

The chapter “Perfected Life” (Dasheng) means: if a person can set the bodily form aside, forget the distinction between self and other, and fully rest in supreme joy that is “no worldly pleasure,” then the reality of xing and ming (nature and life) is completely realized. Zhuangzi therefore composed the “Perfected Life” chapter.

达生之情者不务生之所无以为达命之情者不务知之所无奈何养形必先之物物有余而形不养者有之矣有生必先无离形形不离而生亡者有之矣生之来不能却其去不能止悲夫世之人以为养形足以存生而养形果不足以存生则世奚足为哉虽不足为而不可不为养者有之矣有生必先无离形形不离而生亡者有之矣生之来不能却其去不能止悲夫世之人以为养形足以存生而养形果不足以存生则世奚足为哉虽不足为而不可不为者其为不免矣夫欲免为形者莫如弃世弃世则无累无累则正平正平则与彼更生更生则几矣夫生者时之暂来受之有涯也命者天之所付也自然无间也知其暂来则所谓达生之情也知其所付则所谓达命之情也知其有涯而不以外物而伤之所谓不务生之所无以为也知其无间而不用智巧而蹈晦所谓不务知之所无奈何也然而生必有形形必得养裁其非而养之所谓养形必先之物也养形役物而无厌则物翕赡而形必丧故曰物有余而形不养者有矣夫形者生之所寓也非我形形必得养裁其非而养之所谓养形必先之物也养形役物而无厌则物翕赡而形必丧故曰物有余而形不养者有矣夫形者生之所寓也非我所有也我有而不能自忘之所谓有生必先无离形也形既不忘而自有则形愈亏而生必丧故曰形不离而生亡者有之矣惟能忘生而又能忘形则适来之谓时而适去必能顺也故曰生之来不能却其去不可止夫庄子之书其篇有名养生者有名达生者养之者自内而达之者及外以其自内而故以养生为内篇以其及外而故以达生为外篇此周为书之意也
Interpretation

Those who truly understand the situation of life do not force what life itself cannot accomplish; those who truly understand the situation of fate do not force what even knowledge cannot overcome. To preserve the body, one must first rely on external things—yet there are cases where external things are abundant and the body still cannot be kept well. There is life, and one cannot first leave the body—yet there are also cases where the body remains while life is already lost. When life comes, it cannot be refused; when it goes, it cannot be held back. How lamentable! People think that nurturing the body is enough to preserve life; if nurturing the body truly is insufficient to preserve life, then what in the world is worth doing? Even when it is not worth doing, some things still cannot be left undone—and such people ultimately cannot escape toil.

If you wish to be free from running about for the body’s sake, it is better to withdraw from worldly entanglements (to set aside attachment to mundane affairs). Withdrawal brings no burden; without burden, the mind is upright and calm; upright and calm, one can renew oneself together with the transformations of nature; able to renew in this way, one is close to the Great Dao.

Life is what the times briefly bring and what a person receives within a limit; fate is what Heaven bestows, flowing on in natural continuity, with no gap for interference. To see that life is only a temporary arrival is to understand the true situation of life; to see that it is Heaven’s gift is to understand the true situation of fate. Knowing that life is limited and not harming it with external things is “not pursuing what life has no means to accomplish”; knowing that Heaven’s mandate leaves no opening and not scheming with cleverness but instead holding back (converging one’s brilliance and not displaying wit) is “not pursuing what knowledge cannot help.”

Still, where there is life there must be a body, and the body must be nourished. Trimming away desires that ought not to exist and then preserving it is “nurturing the form must first rely on things.” If one enslaves external things and is insatiably greedy for the sake of nourishing the body, even when things pile up in plenty the body is bound to fail—hence the saying that there are cases where things are more than enough yet the form still cannot be nourished. The body is only where life lodges; it is not truly “mine.” Having this body yet unable to forget it is “having life, one cannot first leave the form.” Unable to forget the body yet treating it as one’s own, the body grows ever more depleted and life is sure to be lost—hence the saying that there are cases where the form has not departed yet life is already gone. Only those who can forget life and also forget the form treat arrival as the turning of the times and follow along when departing—hence the saying that when life comes it cannot be refused, and when it goes it cannot be stopped.

In the book of Zhuang Zhou (Zhuangzi, author of the work recorded in the Nanhua zhenjing), some chapters discuss nurturing life (namely Yangsheng zhu), and some discuss attaining life (Dasheng). Nurturing begins from within; attaining extends outward. Because the focus is inward, nurturing life is placed among the inner chapters; because it involves the outer, attaining life is placed among the outer chapters. This was Zhuang Zhou’s intent in composing the book.

事奚足弃而生奚足遗弃事则形不劳遗生则精不亏夫形全精复与天为一天地者万物之父母也合则成体散则成始形精不亏是谓能移精而又精反以相天事无穷生有涯以有涯而应无穷则力不赡而命殆矣惟能弃事而任自然忘身而处无为则逍遥自得而神王矣故曰弃事则形不劳遗生则精不亏形不精而又精反以相天事无穷生有涯以有涯而应无穷则力不赡而命殆矣惟能弃事而任自然忘身而处无为则逍遥自得而神王矣故曰弃事则形不劳遗生则精不亏形不劳者形所以全也精不亏者精所以复也全则反于真复则归于静如此则与天无异也故曰形全精复与天为一与天为一则物最之也故曰天地者万物之父母也为物之父母而能生成于物故曰合则成体散则成始始者言其生而体者言其成生成万物而不劳形损精而与化之密移是谓至精之精而归于自然而然矣故曰形精不亏是谓能移精而又精反以相天
Interpretation

What in the world is worth clinging to so stubbornly that you must have it, and what in life is worth cherishing so fiercely that you must preserve it at all costs? Set aside worldly business and the body will not wear itself out; loosen your grip on the obsession with survival and jing—the vitality of mind and spirit—will not be drained. When body is preserved and spirit restored, one merges with Heaven as a single whole. Heaven and Earth are the parents of the ten thousand things: when the two unite, they give form to the things; when they part, things return to their original source. When neither body nor spirit is depleted, this is called being able to shift and flow along with change; refining what is already refined, one turns back to assist the Way of Heaven.

Affairs have no end, but life has its limit. To meet endless affairs with a limited life is to overstrain one’s strength and put one’s nature-and-life in peril. Only by dropping worldly tasks, yielding to the natural course, forgetting the self, and resting in wuwei (non-action) can one roam freely and keep spirit full and bright. Thus it is said: drop affairs and the body knows no exhausting toil; ease off the fixation on mere survival and spirit knows no depletion.

When the body is not worn by toil, that is how the body is kept whole; when spirit is not drained, that is how spirit is restored. Preservation returns one to the true root; restoration settles one in emptiness and stillness—and then one is not apart from Heaven. Thus: when body is preserved and spirit restored, one is one with Heaven. Being one with Heaven, the ten thousand things take one as their pivot. Again: Heaven and Earth are the parents of the ten thousand things. As parents of the ten thousand things, they can generate and complete them. Therefore when they unite, form appears; when they scatter, there is return to the beginning. “Beginning” speaks of birth and emergence; “form” speaks of completion and fulfillment. Nurturing and completing the ten thousand things without wearing the body or spending the spirit, shifting together with creation and transformation in a way that leaves no trace of effort—this is the utmost refinement within refinement, the turn toward what is so of itself. Thus: when body and spirit are both unimpaired, it is called being able to migrate with change; refining upon refining, one turns back to align with and assist Heaven. So the teaching runs: preserve body and restore spirit, and you are one with Heaven; Heaven and Earth as parents; unite and there is form, scatter and there is return to the source; wuwei, forget the self, and flow with change at the finest edge of jing.

子列子问关尹曰至人潜行不窒蹈火不热行乎万物之上而不栗请问何以至于此关尹曰是纯气之守也非知巧果敢之列居予尹曰至人潜行不窒蹈火不热行乎万物之上而不栗请问何以至于此关尹曰是纯气之守也非知巧果敢之列居予语女凡有貌象声色者皆物也物与物何以相远夫奚足以至乎先是色而已则物之造乎不形而止乎无所化夫得是而穷之者物焉得而止焉彼将处乎不滛之度而藏乎无端之纪游乎万物之所终始 夫至人者虚心应物而无不通也故曰潜行不窒待物以诚而物莫伤也故曰蹈火不反以相天而心无累也故曰行乎万物之上而不栗然而至人如此者由精神之不亏也非智勇之用也故曰是纯气之守也非智巧果敢之列 壹其性养其气合其德以通乎物之所造夫若是者其天守全其神无却物奚自入焉 壹其性者不跂其本也养其气者不出其和也合其德者守于自得也不跂其本则正正所以存不出其和则真纯所以全守于自得则过失所以忘如此则真君虚静而明于万物之始故曰以通乎物之合其德者守于自得也不跂其本则正正所以存不出其和则真纯所以全守于自得则过失所以忘如此则真君虚静而明于万物之始故曰以通乎物之所造至人若是而其道所以曲全而其妙所以不测万物焉能挠役乎故曰夫若是者其神无郄物奚自入焉
Interpretation

Liezi asked Guan Yin—the Guardian of the Pass, traditionally identified as the keeper of Hangu Pass—how a perfected person (zhiren) could walk underwater without drowning, tread on fire without being scorched, and move among the myriad things without fear. How could one reach such a state?

Guan Yin said: This comes from guarding pure qi (chunqi)—qi that is single and unmixed—not from cleverness or bold daring. Sit down; I will tell you. Whatever has form, appearance, sound, or color is a thing. How far apart can thing and thing really be? How could they ever reach the origin that precedes the myriad things? They are only outward shapes and hues. The myriad things arise from what has no form and cease where change no longer occurs. Whoever grasps this and exhausts it—how can outer things block him? He rests in a measure that does not go too far, hides in the web of what has no beginning, and moves in the space between the beginning and end of the myriad things.

The perfected person responds to the myriad things with an empty heart and meets nothing he cannot pass through; hence it is said that moving hidden does not choke. He treats things with sincerity, and things cannot harm him; hence it is said that treading fire he is not burned. He returns to assist what is naturally so and his heart is not tied down; hence it is said that he moves above the myriad things without fear. The perfected person can do this because his spirit (shen) is not depleted—not because of cleverness or brute strength. So it is said that this is guarding pure qi and does not belong to cleverness and daring.

Devote yourself to your inborn nature, nurture breath and qi, and align your De (virtue/power) with this, so that you may penetrate the source by which the myriad things are fashioned. Such a person keeps his inborn nature whole, his spirit without cracks—and from where could outer things enter?

To devote yourself to your inborn nature is not to force yourself away from the root. To nurture qi is not to step outside harmony. To align with De is to hold fast to what you already possess. Not leaving the root, uprightness is preserved. Not overstepping harmony, genuineness is complete. Holding what you have gained, faults are forgotten. Then the True Lord (inner sovereign of the genuine) is empty and still, yet can clearly know the starting point of the myriad things—hence it is said that by this one penetrates what the myriad things are made from. When the perfected person is thus, his Dao can bend yet remain whole, his subtle functioning cannot be measured, and the myriad things—how could they disturb or use him? So it is said: such a person’s spirit has no gap, and outer things have no way in.

夫醉者之坠车虽疾不死骨节与人同而犯害与人异其神全也乘亦不知也坠亦不知也死生惊惧不入乎其胸中是故物而不慑彼得全于酒而犹若是而况得全于天乎圣人藏于天故莫之能伤也复雠者不折镆干虽有忮心者不怨飘瓦是以天下平均故无攻战之乱无杀戮之刑者由此道也不开人之天而开天之天开天者德生开人者贼生不厌其天不忽于人民几乎以其真仲尼适楚出于林中见痀偻者承蜩犹掇之也仲尼曰子巧乎有道邪曰生开人者贼生不厌其天不忽于人民几乎以其真仲尼适楚出于林中见痀偻者承蜩犹掇之也仲尼曰子巧乎有道邪曰我有道也五六月累丸二而不坠则失者锱铢累三而不坠则失者十一累五而不坠犹掇之也吾处身也若橛株拘吾执臂也若槁木之枝虽天地之大万物之多而唯蜩翼之知吾不反不侧不以万物易蜩之翼何为而不得孔子顾谓弟子曰用志不分乃凝于神其痀偻丈人之谓乎颜渊问仲尼曰吾尝济乎觞深之渊津人操舟若神吾问焉曰操舟可学邪曰可善游者数能若乃夫没人则未尝见舟而便操之也吾问焉而不吾告敢问何谓也仲尼曰善游者数能忘水也若乃夫没人之未尝见舟而便操之也彼视渊若陵视舟之覆犹其车却也覆却万方陈乎前而不得入其恶往而不暇以瓦注者巧以钩注者惮以黄金注者殙其巧一也而有所矜则重外也凡外重者内拙
Interpretation

A man who is drunk falls from a cart; even if he is thrown down hard, he does not die. His joints are the same as anyone else’s, yet the harm he suffers is not the same, because his shen (spirit) is whole. When he gets on the cart he does not know it; when he falls he does not know it either. Life, death, and alarm cannot get into his heart, so when he meets external things he is not afraid. If wine can preserve the spirit to this degree, how much more can one preserve it by relying on one’s innate nature?

Someone bent on revenge will not break swords like Mo Ye and Gan Jiang; even if he harbors resentment, he will not blame a tile that the wind happened to blow down on him. Thus the world can be evened out. There is no calamity of attack and war, and no punishment of slaughter—all of this follows from this principle.

Do not open up artificial cleverness; open up innate nature instead. Open up the innate, and De (virtue/power) is born; open up the artificial, and disaster is born. Do not wear out your inborn disposition, and do not treat human affairs lightly—then the people will be close to living by their authentic nature.

Confucius went to the state of Chu. Coming out of the forest, he saw a hunchbacked old man catching cicadas with a pole as if he were picking them up off the ground. Confucius said, “You are skillful! Is there a Dao (Way) to this?” The old man said, “I have a Dao. After practicing for five or six months, I could balance two pellets on the tip of the pole without their falling—then I hardly ever missed. With three pellets, misses were only one in ten. With five pellets that still would not fall, catching cicadas was like picking them up. When I stand, my body is like a broken tree stump; when I raise my arm, it is like a withered branch. Though heaven and earth are vast and the myriad things are many, in my heart I know only cicada wings. I do not turn my body or let my mind wander; I use nothing to replace my focus on those wings—how could I fail to get them?” Confucius turned to his disciples and said, “Single-mindedness without division—then the spirit can gather. That is what this hunchbacked old man shows.”

Yan Yuan asked Confucius, “Once when I was crossing at Shang Shen, the ferryman handled the boat with marvelous skill. I asked whether boat-handling can be learned. He said it can: people who know how to swim pick it up after a few tries; as for those who can dive, even if they have never seen a boat, they can steer at once. I asked again, but he would not tell me more. What did he mean?” Confucius said, “Those who can swim learn it in a few tries because they have forgotten the water. Those who can dive have never seen a boat yet can steer because they take the deep abyss for a hill and capsize for something as ordinary as a cart rolling backward. Capsizing, retreating, and every sort of situation may lie before them, yet none of it enters their inner heart—where would they not be at ease? Bet with tiles and you are nimble; bet with fishhooks and you are afraid; bet with gold and you are muddled. The skill is fundamentally the same, but once you care about something, you are valuing an external thing. Whoever values external things has an inner clumsiness.”

夫承蜩操舟技往而不暇以瓦注者巧以钩注者惮以黄金注者殙其巧一也而有所矜则重外也凡外重者内拙 夫承蜩操舟技之至末也由能用志而精之精之则乃几于神也而况全生之道乎夫生者事之至大也人能用志而全之全之乃入于神也世俗不能用志而全之此庄子所以寓言仲尼之叹承蜩颜渊之美操舟也 田开之见周威公威公曰吾闻祝肾学生吾子与祝肾游亦何闻焉田开之曰开之操防篲以侍门庭亦何闻于夫子威公曰田子无让寡人愿闻之开之曰闻之夫子曰善养生者若牧羊然视其后者而鞭之威公曰何谓也田开之曰鲁有单豹者岩居而水饮不与民共利行年七十而犹有婴儿之色不幸遇饿虎饿虎杀而食之有张毅者高门县薄无不走也行年四十而有内之病以死豹养其内而虎食其外毅养其外而病攻其内此二子者皆不鞭其后者也 夫生必有形形必有体体所以分于内外也年四十而有内之病以死豹养其内而虎食其外毅养其外而病攻其内此二子者皆不鞭其后者也 夫生必有形形必有体体所以分于内外也全生者均养其内外则内外两全而生所以全也若专养其内而忘其外则外与物迕而不免于累此单豹所以亡躯于虎若专养于外而忘其内则内必焚和而不免于累此张毅所以没身于病也二子者皆不中于道而罹其害此田开之所以有牧羊之喻也
Interpretation

Using a bamboo pole to catch cicadas and steering a boat on water are trifling skills; yet once mastery is complete, the practitioner remains unhurried wherever they go. Someone who bets with roof tiles stays dexterous; someone who bets with belt hooks grows timid; someone who stakes gold grows mentally scattered. Their skill was the same to begin with—once they cling to what they might lose, they load weight onto external things. Whoever prizes externals above all finds the inner self turned clumsy.

Cicada-catching and boat-handling are among the smallest of arts. Yet if one fixes the will and polishes the practice again and again, refinement at the utmost edge approaches what is almost miraculous. How much more so the work of preserving life—life is the greatest of concerns. Fix the will on preserving it to the same extreme, and one may enter that miraculous depth. Ordinary people fail at this; hence Zhuangzi has Confucius praise the old cicada-catcher and Yan Yuan (Confucius’s disciple) praise the ferryman at the crossing—both stories carry that lesson.

Tian Kaizhi called on Duke Wei of Zhou. The duke said, “I hear Zhu Shen studies nurturing life. You keep company with him—what have you heard?” Tian Kaizhi replied, “I only sweep the courtyard and wait at the gate—what could I hear from the master?” The duke said, “Do not demur; I wish to hear.” Tian Kaizhi said, “I heard the master say: one who is good at nurturing life is like a shepherd who whips whichever sheep falls behind.” The duke asked, “What does that mean?” Tian Kaizhi said, “In Lu there was Shan Bao, who lived among cliffs, drank spring water, and did not scramble for worldly gain; at seventy his complexion was still like an infant’s. By misfortune he met a starving tiger and was killed and eaten. There was also Zhang Yi, who never spared grand mansions or humble doorways hung with bamboo blinds; at forty he died of a disease of inner heat. Shan Bao had cultivated the inside, yet a tiger devoured his outer form; Zhang Yi had worked the outside, yet illness invaded his interior. Neither man whipped the side that lagged behind.”

Life necessarily has form; form necessarily has a body; the body in turn divides into inner and outer. One who preserves life nourishes both alike so that neither side fails—only then is life kept whole. Nurture only the inner and neglect the outer, and the outer collides with things—harm cannot be avoided; that is why Shan Bao lost his life to a tiger’s mouth. Work only the outer and forget the inner, and the inner harmony is boiled away—harm again cannot be avoided; that is why Zhang Yi died of disease. Both fell short of the Dao and met disaster. That is what Tian Kaizhi meant by herding sheep and whipping the straggler.

仲尼曰无入而藏无出而阳柴立其中央三者若得其名必极夫畏途者十杀一人则父子兄弟相戒也必盛卒徒而后敢中于道而罹其害此田开之所以有牧羊之喻也 仲尼曰无入而藏无出而阳柴立其中央三者若得其名必极夫畏途者十杀一人则父子兄弟相戒也必盛卒徒而后敢出焉不亦知乎人之所取畏者衽席之上饮食之间而不知为之戒者过也祝宗人端以临牢防说彘曰汝奚恶死吾将三月防汝十日戒三日斋借白茅加汝肩乎雕俎之上则汝为之乎为彘谋曰不如食以糠糟而错之牢防之中自为谋则苟生有轩冕之尊死得于腞楯之上聚偻之中则为之为彘谋则去之自为谋则取之所异彘者何也桓公田于泽管仲御见焉公抚管仲之手曰仲父何见对曰臣无所见公反诶诒为病数日不出齐士有皇子告敖者曰公则自伤恶能伤公夫忿滀之气散而不反则为不足上而不下则使人善怒下而不上则使人善忘不上不下中身当公则自伤恶能伤公夫忿滀之气散而不反则为不足上而不下则使人善怒下而不上则使人善忘不上不下中身当心则为病桓公曰然则有乎曰有沈有履灶有髻户内之烦壤雷霆处之东北方之下者倍阿鲑蠪跃之西北方之下者则泆阳处之水有罔象丘有华山有野有彷徨泽有委蛇公曰请问委蛇之状何如皇子曰委蛇其大如毂其长如辕紫衣而朱冠其为物也恶闻雷车之声则捧其首而立见之者殆乎霸桓公辴然而曰此寡人之所见者也于是正衣冠与之坐不终日而不知病之去也纪渻子为王养斗鸡十日而问鸡已乎曰未也方虚防而恃气十日又者殆乎霸桓公辴然而曰此寡人之所见者也于是正衣冠与之坐不终日而不知病之去也纪渻子为王养斗鸡十日而问鸡已乎曰未也方虚防而恃气十日又问曰未也犹应向景十日又问曰未也犹疾视而盛气十日又问曰几矣鸡虽有鸣者已无变矣望之似木鸡矣其德全矣异鸡无敢应者反走矣
Interpretation

Confucius said: Do not withdraw inward to hide, and do not step outward to show off; stand upright in the middle, like bundled firewood tied in place. When “entering concealment,” “emerging in yang,” and “holding the center” all match their names in practice, cultivation has reached its height.

On a dangerous road, if one traveler in ten is killed, fathers and sons and brothers warn one another; people only dare set out after gathering a large party, for fear of meeting harm on the way. Are people not clear about that kind of danger? Yet what they ought to fear—desire on the couch and indulgence at the table—they do not guard against, and that is a mistake. Tian Kai Zhi, who discussed nurturing life with Duke Wei, used shepherding as a comparison: a good shepherd does not drive the lead sheep or whip the stragglers; he simply keeps to the middle of the flock.

The ritual officer Zhu Zong, dressed in black ceremonial robes, came to the pigsty and reasoned with the pig: “Why must you fear death? I will feed you for three months, then observe ten days of abstinence and three days of fasting, lay white rushes beneath you, and place your shoulder and haunch in a carved sacrificial vessel—would you want that?” If the choice were the pig’s, it would rather eat coarse mash and stay in the pen. When people plan for themselves, they gladly accept living with chariots and caps of rank and dying inside painted hearses and ornate coffins. They reject what they would choose for the pig and grasp what they choose for themselves—how is that different from the pig?

Duke Huan of Qi was hunting in a marsh; Guan Zhong, whom the duke honored as Zhongfu, was driving the carriage when the duke saw a ghost. He gripped Guan Zhong’s hand and asked, “Zhongfu, what do you see?” Guan Zhong said, “I see nothing at all.” After returning, the duke was unsettled and fell ill, staying indoors for days. The scholar of Qi, Huangzi Gao, said: “You have harmed yourself—how could a ghost harm you? When pent-up anger disperses but cannot be gathered back, the body grows empty and depleted. When qi rises but does not descend, a person becomes quick to rage. When it sinks but does not rise, one grows forgetful. When it neither rises nor falls but lodges in the body’s center directly opposing the heart, illness follows.” The duke asked, “Then are there ghosts?” He answered, “There are. In the mud there is Lu; on the stove, Ji; in the gate’s inner earth dwell Lei Ting; below the northeast wall, Bei’a and Kuilong leap about; below the northwest wall lives Yiyang; in water there is Wangxiang, on mounds there is Wei, in mountains there is Kui, in the open country there is Panghuang, and in marshes there is Weishe.” The duke asked what Weishe looked like. Huangzi said: “As large as a chariot hub, as long as a chariot shaft, wearing purple robes and a red cap. It hates the sound of the thunder chariot; when it hears it, it holds its head and stands still. One who sees it is close to achieving hegemony.” The duke laughed and said, “That is exactly what I saw.” He then straightened his robes and cap and sat with Huangzi; before a day had passed, his illness had quietly lifted.

Ji Shengzi was training a fighting cock for the ruler. After ten days the ruler asked, “Is the cock ready?” He answered, “Not yet—it is still hollow and arrogant, relying only on raw blood-and-qi.” Ten days later the ruler asked again; he said, “Still not—it still reacts to every sound and shadow.” After another ten days he said, “Still not—it still glares and swaggers with fighting spirit.” After another ten days he said, “Nearly there. Even when other cocks crow, it does not stir at all; it looks like a wooden cock—its De is complete. No other cock dares to fight it; those that see it turn and run.”

纪渻子之养鸡梓庆之为鐻皆能全其天真而顺其自然也夫天真全则所以德全而合于天故鸡遂至于无敢应而鐻成而凝于神也 孔子观于吕梁县水三十仞流沬四十里鼋鼍鱼鳖之所不能游也见一丈夫游之以为有苦而欲死也使弟子并流而拯之数百步而出被发行歌而游于塘下孔子从而问焉曰吾游之以为有苦而欲死也使弟子并流而拯之数百步而出被发行歌而游于塘下孔子从而问焉曰吾以子为察子则人也请问蹈水有道乎曰亡吾无道吾始乎故长乎性成乎命与齐俱入与汨偕出从水之道而不为私焉此吾所以蹈之也孔子曰何谓始乎故长乎性成乎命曰吾生于陵而安于陵故也长于水而安于水性也不知吾所以然而然命也梓庆削木为鐻鐻成见者惊犹神鲁侯见而问焉曰子何术以为焉对曰臣工人何术之有虽然有一焉臣将为鐻未尝敢以耗气也必齐以静心齐三日而不敢怀庆赏爵禄齐五日不敢怀非誉巧拙齐七日輙然忘吾有四肢形体也当是时也无公朝其巧专而外滑消然后入山林观天性形躯至矣然后成见鐻然后加手焉不然则已则以天合天器之所以疑神者其肢形体也当是时也无公朝其巧专而外滑消然后入山林观天性形躯至矣然后成见鐻然后加手焉不然则已则以天合天器之所以疑神者其是与东野稷以御见庄公进退中绳左右旋中规庄公以为文弗过也使之钩百而反颜阖遇之入见曰稷之马将败公密而不应少焉果败而反公曰子何以知之曰其马力竭矣而犹求焉故曰败工倕旋而盖规矩指与物化而不以心稽故其灵台一而不桎忘足屦之适也忘要带之适也知忘是非心之适也不内变不外从事会之适也始乎适而未尝不适者忘适之适也有孙休者踵门而诧子扁庆子曰休居乡不见内变不外从事会之适也始乎适而未尝不适者忘适之适也有孙休者踵门而诧子扁庆子曰休居乡不见谓不修临难不见谓不勇然而田原不遇岁事君不遇世宾于乡里逐于州部则胡罪乎天哉休恶遇此命也扁子曰子独不闻夫至人之自行邪忘其肝胆遗其耳目芒然彷徨乎尘垢之外逍遥乎无事之业是谓为而不恃长而不宰今汝饰知以惊愚修身以明污昭昭乎若揭日月而行也汝得全而形躯具而九窍无中道夭于聋盲跛蹇而比于人数亦幸矣又何暇乎天之怨哉子往矣孙子出扁子入坐有间仰天而叹弟子问曰先生何为叹乎扁子曰向者休来吾告之以至人之德吾恐其惊而遂至于惑也弟子曰不然孙子之所言是邪先生之所言非邪非固不能惑是孙子所言非邪先生所言是邪彼固惑而来矣又奚罪焉扁子至人之德吾恐其惊而遂至于惑也弟子曰不然孙子之所言是邪先生之所言非邪非固不能惑是孙子所言非邪先生所言是邪彼固惑而来矣又奚罪焉扁子曰不然昔者有鸟止于鲁郊鲁君说之为具太牢以飨之奏九韶以乐之鸟乃始忧悲视不敢饮食此之谓以已养养鸟也若夫以鸟养养鸟者宜栖之深林浮之江湖食之以委蛇则平陆而已矣今休欵启寡闻之民也吾告以至人之德譬之若载鼷以车马乐鴳以钟鼓也彼又恶能无惊乎哉
Interpretation

Ji Wuzi (an ancient master at training fighting cocks) raised cocks, and Ziqing (a carpenter of Lu) made a wooden bell-stand (zhu)—both preserved their innate true nature and followed the natural course. When true nature is preserved, virtue is complete and one aligns with Heaven. So that cock finally reached the point where no other cock dared challenge it, and when the stand was finished, it seemed as if spirit itself had settled upon the work.

Confucius watched at Lüliang (a place of many waterfalls): the hanging water rose thirty ren high (ren is an ancient unit of length), and the churning foam stretched forty li. Turtles, crocodiles, fish, and turtles could not swim there. He saw a man swimming in the water and thought he was in distress and wanted to die, so he sent disciples downstream to rescue him. The man swam several hundred paces before coming out, shook out his hair, walked along singing, and strolled below the embankment. Confucius followed and asked, “At first I took you for a ghost; looking closer, I saw you were a man. May I ask: is there a method to swimming?” The man said, “No, I have no method. I begin from what is inherently mine, grow along with my nature, and complete it in Heaven’s mandate. I sink with the whirlpool and rise with the surge, follow the water’s path, and add nothing of my own will. That is why I can swim.” Confucius said, “What do you mean by beginning from what is inherent, growing along with nature, and completing it in Heaven’s mandate?” He answered, “Born on high ground, I am at home on high ground—that is what is inherent; growing up by water, I am at home in water—that is my nature. I do not know why it is so, yet it is naturally so—that is Heaven’s mandate.”

Ziqing carved wood to make a bell-stand. When it was done, viewers were astonished and thought it the work of spirits or gods. The Duke of Lu asked, “With what Daoist skill did you make this?” He replied, “I am a craftsman—what skill would I have! Yet there is one thing: when I am about to make a stand, I never dare waste my spirit; I always fast to quiet the heart. After three days of fasting I no longer think of reward, rank, or salary; after five days, of praise or blame, or whether my craft is clever or clumsy; after seven days, I suddenly forget that I even have limbs and a body. Then there is no court in my heart, skill is single-minded, and outer disturbance vanishes. Then I enter the mountains and observe the trees’ nature; where the form is most fitting, a complete stand seems to appear before my eyes—only then do I take up the tools; otherwise I do not. This is matching my nature to the tree’s nature. That the object was taken for divine workmanship is probably for this reason.

Dongye Ji presented himself to Duke Zhuang by driving a chariot: advancing and retreating followed the carpenter’s line; turning left and right followed the compass’s circle. The duke thought even painted patterns could not surpass him and had him wheel a hundred circuits and return. Yan He heard of this and came to see the duke, saying, “Ji’s horses will break down.” The duke was silent. Presently the horses did break down and the man returned. The duke asked, “How did you know?” He answered, “The horses’ strength was already spent, yet more was still demanded of them—so they broke down.”

Gong Chui (a legendary craftsman of antiquity) could draw a circle freehand and surpass compass and square. Finger and tool became one; he did not measure with the mind, so his spirit platform (lingtai, the mind) was unified and unbound. Forgetting the feet means the shoes fit; forgetting the waist means the belt fits; when the mind forgets right and wrong, the heart fits; when the inner self does not shift and one does not blindly follow the outer, one meets affairs in just the right way. Beginning from fitting and never being unfit—that is forgetting the fitting of “fitting” itself.

A man named Sun Xiu came to the door and said in surprise to Bian Qingzi, “In my village no one says I neglect virtue; in hardship no one says I lack courage. Yet in farming I miss good years, in serving my lord I miss good times—in the village I am cast out, driven off by the district. How have I offended Heaven? Why such a fate?” Bianzi said, “Have you not heard how the perfected person (zhiren) acts? They forget liver and gall, set aside ears and eyes, wander lost beyond the dust of the world, roam free in doing nothing (wuwei). Thus they have achievement without claiming it, let things grow without dominating them. Now you parade cleverness to startle fools, polish yourself to show others’ filth, and walk bright as though carrying sun and moon. You can keep body whole, all nine openings intact, not ruined mid-course by deafness, blindness, or lameness—you still count among ordinary people; that is luck enough. What leisure to blame Heaven? Be on your way!”

Sun Xiu left. Bianzi came in and sat; after a while he sighed toward Heaven. A disciple asked, “Master, why do you sigh?” Bianzi said, “Sun Xiu just came; I told him the virtue of the perfected person, fearing he would be startled and fall into confusion.” The disciple said, “That is not so. If Sun Xiu was right and you wrong, wrong words cannot confuse one who is right; if Sun Xiu was wrong and you right, he came already confused—what is there to blame?” Bianzi said, “No. Once a bird alighted in Lu’s outskirts. The lord of Lu loved it, feasted it with the grand sacrifice (ta lao—ox, sheep, and pig), and played the Nine Shao (an ancient refined music and dance) to delight it—the bird only grew sorrowful, dazzled, and dared not eat or drink. That is nourishing a bird the way you nourish yourself. To nourish a bird as a bird, let it roost in deep forest, float on rivers and lakes, feed what it naturally eats like mudfish, and leave it on open plain—that is enough. Now Sun Xiu is narrow in sight and small in hearing; I told him the virtue of the perfected person—as if loading a mouse with chariots and horses, or making a sparrow happy with bells and drums—how could he not be alarmed?”

全生之道非至人不能知之矣非至人而与语全生之道是养鸟以太牢九韶之具也安能使无惊惧之心欤此扁子所以虑孙休之惑也夫庄子之作此篇以觉世俗未悟全生之理也而世俗者未可卒告之以全生之道故终于扁子之所叹而寓其所作之意也夫庄子之作此篇以觉世俗未悟全生之理也而世俗者未可卒告之以全生之道故终于扁子之所叹而寓其所作之意也若庄子者可谓能尽其意者乎 山木篇 夫能达生之情而无为无为则归于虚静寂寞而材全材全则不蕲乎用矣庄子因而作山木篇
Interpretation

The principle of preserving life is something only the True Person—one who has reached the utmost height of cultivation—can truly grasp. To expound the way of full preservation of life to someone who is not a True Person is like trying to entertain a bird with a full tai-lao sacrifice (ox, sheep, and pig together) and the music of the Nine Shao: how could it fail to panic the bird? That is why Bian Qingzi (Master Bian) feared that Sun Xiu would sink into confusion. Zhuangzi wrote this chapter to awaken people in the world who have not yet understood the principle of preserving life; yet people in the world cannot instantly receive the teaching of full preservation, so he closed with Bian’s sigh and lodged his authorial intent there. In this, one may say Zhuangzi fully carried his meaning through.

Mountain Tree (Shanmu)

When one can penetrate the real circumstances of life and practice Wuwei (non-action), Wuwei returns one to empty stillness and silence, and the timber of one’s inborn nature is preserved. Once that timber is preserved, one does not seek to be put to use by the world. Zhuangzi therefore composed the “Mountain Tree” chapter.

庄子行于山中见大木枝叶盛茂伐木者止其旁而不取也问其故曰无所可用庄子曰此木以不材得终其天年庄子出于山舍于故人之家故人喜命防子杀雁而烹之竖子请曰其一能鸣其一不能鸣请奚杀主人曰杀不能鸣者明日弟子问于庄子曰昨日山中之木以不材得终其天年今主人之雁以不材死先生将何处庄子笑曰周将处夫材与不材之间材与不材之间似之而非也故未免乎累若夫乘道德昨日山中之木以不材得终其天年今主人之雁以不材死先生将何处庄子笑曰周将处夫材与不材之间材与不材之间似之而非也故未免乎累若夫乘道德而浮游则不然无誉无訾一龙一蛇与时俱化而无肯专为一上一下以和为量浮游乎万物之祖物物而不物于物则胡可得而累邪此神农黄帝之法则也若夫万物之情人伦之传则不然合则离成则毁廉则挫尊则议有为则亏贤则谋不肖则欺胡可得而必乎哉悲夫弟子志之其唯道德之乡乎
Interpretation

While walking in the mountains, Zhuangzi saw a large tree with lush, spreading branches. A woodcutter paused beside it but did not cut it down. When asked why, the man said, “It’s no good for anything.” Zhuangzi said, “This tree has been able to live out its full span precisely because its wood is good for nothing.”

When Zhuangzi left the mountains, he stayed at an old friend’s house. The friend was pleased and told his servant to kill a goose for cooking. The servant asked, “One of them honks and one does not—which should I kill?” The master said, “Kill the one that cannot honk.”

The next day a disciple asked Zhuangzi, “Yesterday the tree in the mountains lived out its years because it was useless as timber; today the master’s goose died because it was useless in that way. How, Master, are you going to place yourself?”

Zhuangzi smiled and said, “I, Zhuang Zhou, intend to stand between being useful timber and being useless timber. Yet that ‘in-between’ looks right but is not really so; one still cannot escape being dragged along. If one can roam freely in accord with the Way (Dao) and Virtue (De), it is not like that: neither praised nor slandered; now like a dragon, now like a snake, shifting with the times and not clinging to a single fixed course; rising or sinking, taking harmony as one’s measure, drifting in the root-source of the myriad things. To put outer things to use without being put to use by outer things—how could one then be entangled? That is the pattern Shennong and the Yellow Emperor took as their model.

“As for the real state of the myriad things and the transmitted patterns of human relations, it is not so: where there is joining there is parting, where there is completion there is destruction; what has sharp corners gets broken, what is lofty gets talked about; where there is acting there is loss; the capable get schemed against, the incapable get pushed around—how can one insist that things must go a certain way? How lamentable! You disciples, remember: only by turning toward the realm of the Way and Virtue can one be at ease.”

夫命者材之体材者命之用材所以殊小大而用所以分有无圣人之材大材也材大则材全而已矣材全而以无用为用则能全生此山木以不材而得终其天年也世俗之材小材也材小则材缺而已矣材缺而亦以无用为用则反丧生此山舍之雁以不能鸣而见烹也夫雁之不能鸣亦似山木之不材也似之而未为其全材是以不免于俗之材小材也材小则材缺而已矣材缺而亦以无用为用则反丧生此山舍之雁以不能鸣而见烹也夫雁之不能鸣亦似山木之不材也似之而未为其全材是以不免于患也故曰材与不材之间似之而非也故未免乎累
Interpretation

What is called ming (allotted nature, the root of one’s being) is the underlying substance of cai (talent or intrinsic quality); what is called cai is the functioning of ming. Cai is what separates the greater from the lesser; yong (use) is what separates the useful from the useless.

The sage’s cai is great cai. When cai is great, cai is whole; once it is whole and one can treat the useless as useful, life can be preserved. That is why trees in the mountains, because they are not good timber, live out their natural years. The cai of ordinary people is small cai. When cai is small, cai is incomplete; once it is incomplete, yet one still treats the useless as useful, life is lost instead. That is why the goose at a mountain inn, because it could not honk, was killed for the pot. Not being able to honk looks like a mountain tree’s failure as timber—they are only alike in appearance, not truly whole in cai—so disaster cannot be avoided.

Hence the saying: to dwell between being timber and not being timber may seem to be the answer, but in truth it is not; one still cannot free oneself from being pulled along.

市南宜僚见鲁侯鲁侯有忧色市南子曰君有忧色何也鲁侯曰吾学先王之道修先君之业吾敬鬼尊贤亲而行之无须防离居然不免于患吾是以忧市南子曰君之除患之术浅矣夫丰狐文豹栖于山林伏于岩穴静也夜行昼居戒也虽饥渴约犹且胥防于江湖之上而求食焉定也然且不免于网罗机辟之患是何罪之有哉其皮为之灾也今鲁国独非君之皮邪吾愿君刳形去皮洒心去欲而游于无人之野南越有邑焉名为建德之国其民愚而朴少私而寡欲知作而不知藏与而不求其报不知义之所适不知礼之所将猖狂妄行乃蹈乎大方其生可乐其死可南越有邑焉名为建德之国其民愚而朴少私而寡欲知作而不知藏与而不求其报不知义之所适不知礼之所将猖狂妄行乃蹈乎大方其生可乐其死可吾愿君去国捐俗与道相辅而行君曰彼其道远而险又有江山我无舟车奈何市南子曰君无形倨无留居以为君车君曰彼其道幽远而无人吾谁与为邻吾无粮我无食安得而至焉市南子曰少君之费寡君之欲虽无粮而乃足君其涉于江而浮于海望之而不见其崖愈往而不知其所穷送君者皆自崖而反君自此远矣故有人者累见有于人者忧故尧非有人非见有于人也吾而乃足君其涉于江而浮于海望之而不见其崖愈往而不知其所穷送君者皆自崖而反君自此远矣故有人者累见有于人者忧故尧非有人非见有于人也吾愿去君之累除君之忧而独与道游于大莫之国方舟而济于河有虚来触舟虽有惼心之人不怒有一人在其上则呼张歙之一呼而不闻再呼而不闻于是三呼邪则必以恶声随之向也不怒而今也怒向也虚而今也实人能虚已以游世其孰能害之
Interpretation

Shi Nan Yiliang (a worthy of Chu, known as Master Shi Nan because he lived south of the market) called on the Lord of Lu. Seeing worry on his face, he asked, “Why are you troubled?” The Lord said, “I study the Way of the former kings, carry on the work of my predecessors, revere ghosts and spirits and respect the worthy—I do these things myself and dare not slacken even for a moment—yet I still cannot escape misfortune. That is why I am troubled.”

Master Shi Nan said, “Your way of removing harm is too shallow. Foxes with thick fur and leopards with fine patterns live in mountain forests and hide in rocky caves—that is stillness; they move at night and lie low by day—that is caution; even when hungry and thirsty and in hardship they go far to rivers and lakes to find food—that is prudence. Yet they still cannot escape nets and traps. What crime have they committed? It is that coat of theirs that brings disaster. Lu today—is it not your coat? I wish you would shed the burden of the body, cast off this coat, cleanse the heart and drop desire, and wander in empty wilds where no one goes.

“In the far south there is a city-state called the Land of Jian De. Its people are simple: little selfishness, faint desire. They know work but not hoarding; they give to others and ask nothing back. They do not know where righteousness should apply, nor how ritual ought to be practiced. They seem to act at random, yet in fact tread the great Dao. Alive, they can live at ease; dead, they can be buried in peace. I wish you would leave your throne, set aside worldly affairs, and go forward in the company of the Dao.”

The Lord of Lu said, “That road is long and dangerous, with rivers and mountains—I have no boat or carriage. What am I to do?” Master Shi Nan said, “Do not be arrogant or affected, do not cling and stay put—take that as your carriage.” The Lord said, “That road is remote and empty—whom shall I have as companion? Without grain, how can I arrive?” Master Shi Nan said, “Cut expenses and restrain desire; even without grain you will have enough. You cross rivers and float on the sea, the far shore out of sight, going on without knowing where it ends. Those who see you off all turn back from the cliff’s edge, and from there you go far alone. One who possesses the people is weighed down; one possessed by others has sorrow. Yao neither possessed the people nor was possessed by them. I wish to lift your burden and clear your sorrow, and with you wander only with the Dao in the great empty realm (a vast land without things).

“When boats are tied side by side to cross a river, an empty boat that bumps you will not anger even a narrow-minded person; if there is someone in the boat, he will shout for the other to steer clear or come alongside. Once, twice—no response—and on the third call he is sure to curse. Before there was no anger and now there is anger, because before the boat was empty and now there is someone in it. If a person can empty himself and move through the world, who can harm him?”

夫材全则所以知命知命则所以不忧鲁侯之材不全而不能知于命所以有忧色而已夫忧者生于物之所累也鲁侯物于国而其国所以为之累此市南子引丰狐文豹皮为之灾而谕之也人欲使其国不能为累者莫若无心于物而任其自然无意于民而任其自化泛然游于自得之场而处于至虚之域则其材所以自全而其用归于无用乃入于寥天而孰能为之害乎故曰君自此远矣又曰虚已以游世其孰能害之此市南子语鲁侯以根固用归于无用乃入于寥天而孰能为之害乎故曰君自此远矣又曰虚已以游世其孰能害之此市南子语鲁侯以根固蒂无为清浄之道也 北宫奢为卫灵公赋敛以为钟为坛乎郭门之外三月而成上下之县王子庆忌见而问焉曰子何术之设奢曰一之间无敢设也奢闻之既雕既琢复归于朴侗乎其无识傥乎其怠疑萃乎芒乎其送往而迎来来者勿禁往者勿止从其强梁随其曲傅因其自穷故朝夕赋敛而毫毛不挫而况有大涂者乎 夫道一而不可不变也变而复归于真也生物而任其自生也成物而任其自成也不加不损而与物无迕也无为无用而莫知其终也此皆至道之妙体而得之足以全生矣此北宫奢所以寓之于为任其自生也成物而任其自成也不加不损而与物无迕也无为无用而莫知其终也此皆至道之妙体而得之足以全生矣此北宫奢所以寓之于为钟为坛之间也故曰而况有大涂者乎
Interpretation

When talent and nature are complete, one can understand the Mandate of Heaven; once the Mandate is understood, worry ceases. The Marquis of Lu’s talent and nature were not complete—he could not grasp the Mandate of Heaven—so worry merely showed on his face. Worry arises from being dragged down by external things. The Marquis tied his mind to state affairs, and the realm became his burden. Shinanzi of Shinan (a recluse of Chu) used the parable of the fat fox and the patterned leopard, whose beautiful pelts bring disaster, to instruct him. If one wishes the state no longer to weigh one down, it is better not to reckon with externals and to let nature take its course; not to force action upon the people and to let them transform on their own. Wander calmly where self-satisfaction is found; rest in the utmost emptiness and stillness—then one’s own talent and nature can be preserved, one’s effect returns to “uselessness,” and one enters the vast Heaven (liaotian, the open expanse of the Way). Who could then harm you? Hence “From this you may keep far from worry and harm,” and again “Empty yourself to wander the world—who can injure you?” This is the deep-rooted, firmly grounded path of wuwei and purity that Shinanzi taught the Marquis of Lu.

Beigong She collected levies for Duke Ling of Wei to cast bells. He set up an altar outside the outer city gate; within three months the bells were cast and could be hung in tiers. Prince Qingji saw this and asked, “What method did you use?” She said, “I held to a single ‘one-pointedness’ and dared not set up any other approach in between.” He had heard: though carved and refined, one must still return to simplicity. Dull as if without insight, dazed as if slow and hesitant—in boundless confusion, seeing off what goes and welcoming what comes: what arrives is not blocked, what departs is not held back; the hard is followed, the yielding is followed too, and each is left to reach its own end. Thus morning and evening he collected taxes yet never harmed the people so much as a hair—and how much less those who walk the great road?

The Dao is originally one, yet cannot but change; after change it returns to true simplicity. It nourishes the myriad things yet lets each grow by itself; completes the myriad things yet lets each finish by itself. It neither adds nor subtracts and does not clash with things; wuwei (non-action), not seeking utility—no one knows where it ends. These are the subtle substance of the utmost Dao; to awaken to them is enough to preserve life. Beigong She precisely entrusted this teaching to bell-casting and altar-building—hence “how much more those who have the great road to walk?”

孔子围于陈蔡之间七日不火食太公任往吊之曰子几死乎曰然子恶死乎曰然任曰予尝言不死之道东海有鸟焉其名曰意怠其为鸟也翂翂翐翐而似无能引援而飞迫胁而栖进不敢为前退不敢为后食不敢先尝必取其绪是故其行列不斥而外人卒不得害是以免于患真木先伐甘井先竭子其意者饰知以惊愚修身以明污昭昭乎如揭日月而行故不免也昔吾闻之大成之人曰自伐者无功功成者隳名成者亏孰能去功与名而还与众人道流而不明居得行而不名不免也昔吾闻之大成之人曰自伐者无功功成者隳名成者亏孰能去功与名而还与众人道流而不明居得行而不名处纯纯常常乃比于狂削迹捐势不为功名是故无责于人人亦无责焉至人不闻子何喜哉孔子曰善哉辞其交游去其弟子逃于大泽衣裘褐食杼栗入兽不乱群入鸟不乱行鸟兽不恶而况人乎孔子问子桑虖曰吾再逐于鲁伐树于宋削迹于卫穷于商周围于陈蔡之间吾犯此数患亲交益防徒友益散何与子桑虖曰子独不闻假人之亡与林回弃千金之璧负赤子而趋或曰为其布与赤子之布寡矣为其累与赤子之累多矣弃千金之璧负赤子而趋何也林回曰彼以利合此以天属也夫以利合者迫穷祸患害相弃也以天属者迫穷祸患害相收也多矣弃千金之璧负赤子而趋何也林回曰彼以利合此以天属也夫以利合者迫穷祸患害相弃也以天属者迫穷祸患害相收也夫相收之与相弃亦远矣且君子之交淡若水小人之交甘如醴君子淡以亲小人甘以绝彼无故以合者则无故以离孔子曰敬闻命矣徐行翔佯而归绝学捐书弟子无挹于前其爱益加进异日桑虖又曰舜之将死真泠禹曰汝戒之哉形莫若缘情莫若率缘则不离率则不劳不离不劳则不求文以待形不求文以待形固不待物庄子衣大布而补之正緳系履而过魏王魏王曰何先生之惫邪庄子曰贫也非惫也士有道德不能行惫也衣履穿贫也非惫也此所谓非遭时也王独不见夫腾猿乎其得补之正緳系履而过魏王魏王曰何先生之惫邪庄子曰贫也非惫也士有道德不能行惫也衣履穿贫也非惫也此所谓非遭时也王独不见夫腾猿乎其得柟梓豫章也揽蔓其枝而生长其间虽羿逄蒙不能盼睨也及其得柘棘枳枸之间也危行侧视振动悼栗此筋骨非有加急而不柔也处势不便未足以逞其能也今处昏上乱相之间而欲无惫奚可得邪此比干之见剖心征也夫孔子穷于陈蔡之间七日不火食左据槁木右击槁枝而歌焱氏之风有其具而无其数有其声而无宫角木声与人声犂然有当于人之心颜回端拱夫孔子穷于陈蔡之间七日不火食左据槁木右击槁枝而歌焱氏之风有其具而无其数有其声而无宫角木声与人声犂然有当于人之心颜回端拱还目而窥之仲尼恐其广已而造大也爱已而造哀也曰回无受天损易无受人益难无始而非卒也人与天一也夫今之歌者其谁乎回曰敢问无受天损易仲尼曰饥渴寒暑穷桎不行天地之行也运物之泄也言与之偕逝之谓也为人臣者不敢去之执臣之道犹若是而况乎所以待天乎何谓无受人益难仲尼曰始用四达爵禄并至而不穷物之所利乃非已也吾命有在外者也君子不为盗贤人不为窃吾若取之何哉故曰鸟莫知于鷾鸸目之所不宜处不给视虽
Interpretation

Confucius was besieged between Chen and Cai and for seven days could not kindle a fire to cook food. Tai Gong Ren came to offer sympathy and said, “You are about to die, are you not?” Confucius said, “Yes.” “Are you afraid of death?” Confucius said, “Yes.” Tai Gong Ren said, “I once spoke of what it means not to die. In the eastern sea there is a bird called Yi Dai. It flies slowly and sluggishly, as if it had no real ability; it needs companions to lead it before it will fly, and when it roosts it presses close to other birds. Advancing, it dares not rush to the front; retreating, it dares not fall behind. When eating, it dares not taste first—it only picks what is left over. Thus it is never pushed out of the flock, and outsiders can never harm it, and so it escapes disaster. Trees that are truly fit for timber are cut down first; sweet wells are drained first. You, I suspect, adorn your wisdom to startle foolish people, cultivate yourself to reflect others’ filth, and walk about as brightly as if holding up the sun and moon—so how could you avoid calamity? I once heard a person of complete accomplishment say: those who boast of themselves have no merit; when achievement is complete it is destroyed, when fame is complete it is lost. Who can discard merit and fame and give them back to the multitude? The Great Dao circulates without displaying itself; De operates without dwelling in reputation—plain and ordinary, like a madman; erasing tracks, casting off power, not seeking renown. Therefore one does not demand of others, and others do not demand of one. The Perfect Man does not seek a name—so why should you be fond of reputation?” Confucius said, “Well said!” Thereupon he took leave of his friends, dismissed his disciples, fled into the great marshes, wore coarse fur clothing, and ate acorns; he entered herds of beasts without scattering them, entered flocks of birds without startling them into flight. Birds and beasts did not dislike him—how much more so with people?

Confucius asked Zisang Hu, “Twice I was driven out of Lu; in Song I lectured under a tree and even the tree was felled; in Wei I could not remain and my traces were erased; in Shang and Zhou I fell into hardship; and I was besieged between Chen and Cai. Meeting these misfortunes one after another, relatives and old friends grew more guarded, disciples and friends scattered further—why is this?” Zisang Hu said, “Have you not heard of the man of Jia who fled? Lin Hui abandoned a jade disk worth a thousand in gold and fled carrying an infant on his back. Someone asked, ‘Was it for money? The infant is not valuable. Was it because of burden? The infant is an even greater burden. To discard a thousand-gold jade disk and run carrying an infant—why?’ Lin Hui said, ‘The jade disk was joined by profit; the infant is joined by what is natural in heaven-and-earth.’ What is joined by profit, when poverty and disaster strike, is abandoned by one another; what is joined by nature, when poverty and disaster strike, is taken in by one another. To take in and to abandon—how far apart they are! Moreover, the friendship of gentlemen is as tasteless as water; the friendship of petty men is as sweet as sweet wine. Gentlemen are bland yet remain close; petty men are sweet yet easily break apart. What joins without cause also separates without cause.” Confucius said, “I respectfully receive your instruction.” Thereupon he returned at an easy pace, abandoned vulgar learning, and cast aside books. His disciples no longer bowed and saluted before him, yet their affection for him grew deeper.

Later one day Zisang Hu said again, “When Shun was dying, he clearly admonished Yu: ‘Be careful! The body is best when it follows along; the disposition is best when it is genuine. Following along, one does not lose one’s place; being genuine, one is not worn out. Not losing one’s place and not being worn out—then there is no need to adorn the body with artifice; not adorning the body with artifice, then there is no need to seek from external things.’”

Zhuang Zhou, wearing patched coarse cloth garments, straightened his belt and tied his shoes to visit the King of Wei. The king said, “Sir, why are you in such distress?” Zhuang Zhou said, “It is poverty, not distress. When a scholar has De yet cannot put it into practice, that is called distress; when clothes are torn and shoes worn through, that is poverty, not distress. This is failing to meet the right time. Has Your Majesty not seen the leaping gibbons? When they are among great trees such as nan, zi, or zhang, grasping branches and living among them, even skilled archers like Yi and Peng Meng cannot so much as glance sideways at them. When they drop into thickets of zhe, ji, zhi, and gou, they walk carefully, look askance, tremble with fear. This is not that their sinews and bones suddenly stiffen and lose suppleness—it is that the situation is unfavorable and they cannot deploy their abilities. To be among muddled rulers and chaotic ministers today and wish not to be in distress—how is that possible? This is exactly the kind of omen seen in Bi Gan’s having his heart cut out!”

Confucius was trapped between Chen and Cai and for seven days could not kindle a fire to cook. He leaned his left hand on a withered tree and tapped with a withered branch in his right hand, singing the song of the Yan clan. There were striking implements but no regular beat; there was sound but no gong or jiao scale—yet the sound of wood and the sound of the voice clearly moved the heart. Yan Hui stood upright with hands folded, stealing glances to the side. Zhongni feared he would exaggerate himself and push the realm too high, and also pitied himself and sank into grief, so he said, “Hui, not taking to heart the injury heaven sends down is easier; not accepting the benefit people give is harder. There is no beginning that is not also an ending—human and heaven are originally one. Who is it that is singing now?” Yan Hui said, “May I ask what it means that not accepting heaven’s injury is easier?” Zhongni said, “Hunger, thirst, cold, heat, being bound in poverty and obstruction and unable to follow one’s will—these are the operations of heaven and earth, the shifting and waxing and waning of the ten thousand things. That is what is meant by going along with them and passing through. Even one who serves as minister dares not leave his post; to hold to the way of the minister is like this—how much more so in serving heaven!” “What is meant by not accepting the benefit people give being harder?” Zhongni said, “As soon as one is employed, one is connected in all directions; rank and salary arrive together without end. The profit that external things bring is not originally one’s own—it belongs to the outer portion of one’s fate. The gentleman does not act the thief; the worthy man does not act the pilferer. If I were to take these, what would I be? Therefore it is said: among birds none is cleverer than the yiyi. When the eye sees a place unfit to linger, it does not even look; even if something falls, it no longer turns its gaze.”

落其

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →