中文 · EN

《南华真经新传》Vol. 4

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書 Vol. 4 / 6 25,000 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南华真经新传》 Vol. 4 (Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書, 6 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 54 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南华真经新传》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

实弃之而走其畏人也而袭诸人间社稷存焉尔何谓无始而非卒仲尼曰化其万物而不知其禅之者焉知其所终焉知其所始正而待之而已耳何谓人与天一邪仲尼曰有人天也有天亦袭诸人间社稷存焉尔何谓无始而非卒仲尼曰化其万物而不知其禅之者焉知其所终焉知其所始正而待之而已耳何谓人与天一邪仲尼曰有人天也有天亦天也人之不能有天性也圣人晏然体逝而终矣庄周游乎雕陵之樊睹一异鹊自南方来者翼广七尺目大运寸感周之颡而集于栗林庄周曰此何鸟哉翼殷不逝目大不睹褰裳躩步执弹而留之睹一蝉方得美防而忘其身螳螂执翳而抟之见得而忘其形异鹊从而利之见利而忘其真庄周怵然曰噫物固相累二相召也捐弹而反走虞人逐而谇之庄周反入三月不庭蔺且从而问之夫子形异鹊从而利之见利而忘其真庄周怵然曰噫物固相累二相召也捐弹而反走虞人逐而谇之庄周反入三月不庭蔺且从而问之夫子何为顷间甚不庭乎庄周曰吾守形而忘身观于浊水而迷于清渊且吾闻诸夫子曰入其俗从其俗今吾游于雕陵而忘吾身异鹊感吾颡游于栗林而忘真栗林虞人以为吾戮吾所以不庭也形者天之委质也命之所累也惟其能忘形则足以忘物忘物则足以全命命全则足以全生惟其不能忘形则不能忘物不能忘物则不能全命不能全命则不能全生此庄周所以有执弹鹊蝉螳螂之言也夫执弹弹鹊而忘栗林之禁此役于物而不能忘形也螳螂抟蝉而忘异鹊之所利此利于得而不能全命也不能忘形而全命皆不免于忧患也安得生所以全欤此周之所以遽悟而不出门庭螂抟蝉而忘异鹊之所利此利于得而不能全命也不能忘形而全命皆不免于忧患也安得生所以全欤此周之所以遽悟而不出门庭也
Interpretation

He actually dropped what he had and fled, because he feared people in his heart; yet this pattern still plays out among human beings, and the altars of soil and grain—the land and the harvest that stand for the state—remain.

What is meant by “no beginning is not also an ending”: Zhongni (Confucius’s courtesy name) said that the ten thousand things are all born and transformed; people do not know who receives and replaces them, so how could they know where they end or where they begin? Simply set yourself right and wait in peace.

What is meant by “human beings and Heaven are one”: Zhongni said that where there are human beings, there is Heaven; where there is Heaven, there is likewise Heaven. Human beings cannot possess Heaven as their own—that is how their nature is. The sage simply rests in accepting the passing of the bodily form until life reaches its end.

Zhuang Zhou (Zhuangzi) was wandering among the fence rails at Diaoling when he saw a strange magpie fly in from the south, its wings spanning about seven feet and its eyes about an inch across. It brushed past Zhuangzi’s forehead and alighted in a chestnut grove. Zhuangzi said: What sort of bird is this—wings so large yet it does not fly far, eyes so large yet it does not see? He hitched up his robe, strode after it, and waited with his crossbow.

He saw a cicada that had just found a fine patch of shade and forgot itself; a mantis hid behind a leaf to snatch it, saw its gain, and forgot its own form; the strange magpie followed to take advantage and, seeing profit, forgot its true nature. Zhuangzi suddenly woke up and said: Alas! Things naturally entangle one another—these two kinds draw each other on. He threw down his crossbow, turned, and left; the park keeper who guarded the grounds ran after him and scolded him. Zhuangzi returned home and for three months did not step out of his courtyard.

His disciple Lan Que asked: Master, why have you been so downcast lately and not left the courtyard? Zhuangzi said: I clung to the outer form and forgot myself—like staring at muddy water and losing the clear deep spring. Moreover I heard you say that when one arrives somewhere, one should follow the customs there. Now I wandered at Diaoling and forgot myself; the strange magpie touched my forehead; I entered the chestnut grove and forgot my true nature; the keeper of the chestnut grove took me for someone who deserved blame. That is why I have not left the courtyard.

The bodily form is the endowment Heaven assigns to a person and also what life and fate burden one with. Only when one can forget the form is one able to forget outer things; forgetting outer things is enough to preserve life and fate; when life and fate are preserved, life itself is preserved. If one cannot forget the form, one cannot forget things; if one cannot forget things, one cannot fully preserve life and fate; if one cannot fully preserve life and fate, one cannot fully preserve life. Zhuangzi spoke of taking up the crossbow, the strange magpie, the cicada, and the mantis precisely to make this point. Taking up the crossbow to shoot the magpie while forgetting the prohibition in the chestnut grove is being driven by outer things—failure to forget the form. The mantis catches the cicada while forgetting that the strange magpie will profit from it—that is grasping at gain and failure to fully preserve life and fate. When one can neither forget the form nor fully preserve life and fate, trouble cannot be avoided; how then can life be fully preserved? That is exactly why Zhuangzi suddenly understood and no longer left the courtyard.

阳子之宋宿于逆旅逆旅人有妾二人其一人美其一人恶恶者贵而美者贱阳子问其故逆旅小子对曰其美者自美吾不知其美也其恶者自恶吾不知其恶也阳子曰弟子记之行贤而去自贤之行安往而不爱哉夫欲全其性命终其天年者莫若外忘其形也形忘则所以自得而所适安有不得欤此阳子所以取逆旅小子之言也夫美者自美吾不知其美恶者自恶吾不知其恶者此皆外忘其形而恶美从而两忘也岂为不全性命之情欤此庄子所以言其美恶者自恶吾不知其恶者此皆外忘其形而恶美从而两忘也岂为不全性命之情欤此庄子所以言之于篇终也 南华真经新传卷九 钦定四库全书 南华真经新传卷十 宋 王雱 撰 田子方篇 夫真人者全至乐达生理以不材为材无用为用而不失真此魏无择之师如此矣庄子因而作田子篇
Interpretation

When Yang Zhu traveled to the state of Song, he lodged at an inn. The innkeeper had two concubines—one beautiful, one plain—yet the plain one was favored and the beautiful one was slighted. Yang Zhu asked why. A young man at the inn said, “The one who thought herself beautiful—I did not find her beautiful; the one who thought herself ugly—I did not find her ugly.”

Yang Zhu said, “Students, remember this: if you act worthily and also drop the idea that you are worthy, where would you fail to be well regarded?”

Those who wish to preserve life and live out their natural years do best to forget their outward form in outward dealings. When form is forgotten, the inner self can rest at ease—how could one not feel settled wherever one goes? That is why Yang Zhu took the young man’s words to heart. People who deem themselves beautiful are not seen as beautiful; those who deem themselves ugly are not seen as ugly. In both cases they have forgotten outward form, and beauty and ugliness are forgotten together. Is that not preserving the authentic truth of life? Hence Zhuangzi returns to this point at the end of the chapter.

New Commentary on the True Classic of Nanhua (a commentary on the Zhuangzi), fascicle 9. The Complete Library of the Four Treasures edition, fascicle 10, by Wang Pi of the Song, on the “Tian Zifang” chapter.

The true person can preserve supreme joy, penetrate the principle of life, take “uncultivated timber” as timber and “uselessness” as use, yet never lose original authenticity. The teacher of Wei Wuzu (Tian Zifang) was such a person; Zhuangzi therefore composed the “Tian Zifang” chapter.

田子方侍坐于魏文侯数称溪工文侯曰溪工子之师邪子方曰非也无择之里人也称道数当故无择称之文侯曰然则子无师邪子方曰有曰子之师谁邪子方曰东郭顺子文侯曰然则夫子何故未尝称之子方曰其为人也真人貌方曰非也无择之里人也称道数当故无择称之文侯曰然则子无师邪子方曰有曰子之师谁邪子方曰东郭顺子文侯曰然则夫子何故未尝称之子方曰其为人也真人貌而天虚缘而葆真清而容物物无道正容以悟之使人之意也消无择何足以称之子方出文侯傥然终日不言召前立臣而语之曰远矣全德之君子始吾以圣知之言仁义之行为至矣吾闻子方之师吾形解而不欲动口钳而不欲言吾所学者真土梗耳夫魏真为我累耳 夫真人者内直而不假于物也具体而任其无为也故曰人貌而天虚静而不失其正也故曰虚缘而葆真湛然足以有容也故曰清而容物邪僻来干则示之以未始出吾宗而俾之自灭也故曰物无道正容以悟之使人之意也消此皆合于道之无名也无名安可强名乎此田子方所以言无择何足以称之也夫子方之师如此也万物消此皆合于道之无名也无名安可强名乎此田子方所以言无择何足以称之也夫子方之师如此也万物安足为累乎此文侯自嗟其所学之非道而魏国之为累也故曰吾所学者真土梗耳魏真为我累耳
Interpretation

Tian Zifang (personal name Wuzhe) sat beside Duke Wen of Wei (ruler of Wei during the Warring States period) and repeatedly praised Xigong. The duke asked, “Is Xigong your teacher?” Zifang replied, “No. He is a fellow townsman. When he explains things he is often right on the mark, so I praise him.” The duke said, “Then you have no teacher?” Zifang said, “I do.” The duke asked, “Who is your teacher?” Zifang said, “Dongguo Shunzi.” The duke said, “Then why do you never praise him?” Zifang said, “In his conduct he is utterly genuine: though he has the form of a person, inwardly he is at one with Heaven; by empty stillness he accords with outward things and thereby preserves his true nature; his mind is clear and can embrace the ten thousand things. When someone or something is not in accord with the Dao, he simply straightens his bearing so that the other person understands, and the other’s intention naturally dissolves. How could someone like me, Wuzhe, be fit to speak of him with praise!”

After Zifang left, Duke Wen was lost in melancholy. All day he did not speak. He summoned the attendants standing before him and said to them, “How lofty— that gentleman whose virtue is complete! At first I thought that the words of sages and the conduct of benevolence and righteousness were the highest reach. After hearing how Master Zifang’s teacher lives, my body feels as if it has come apart and I do not want to move; my mouth feels as if it were clamped shut and I do not want to speak. What I have learned is truly nothing but a clay puppet! Wei has truly become my burden!”

What is called a “true person” is one whose inner mind is upright and who does not lean on external things; though he has human form, he entrusts everything to wuwei (non-action)— hence “human in appearance yet Heaven within.” He is empty and still without losing the right Way— hence “empty in accord, preserving the true.” His inner mind is limpid enough to contain outward things— hence “clear and embracing things.” When perversity comes to intrude, he shows the other the source from which he has never departed from the great Dao, so that perversity extinguishes itself— hence “when things are without the Dao, he corrects his bearing to awaken them, and the other’s intention dissolves.” All of this matches the Dao’s quality of being beyond naming. Since the Dao is nameless, how can one force a name upon it? That is why Tian Zifang said he was not adequate to praise his teacher with words. When a teacher’s realm is like this, how could the ten thousand things become a burden? Duke Wen therefore lamented that what he had learned was not the true Dao, and that Wei had instead become a weight upon him— so he said what he had learned was like a clay effigy of earth, and that Wei was truly his encumbrance.

温伯雪子适齐舍于鲁鲁人有请见之者温伯雪子曰不可吾闻中国之君子明乎礼义而陋于知人心吾不欲见也至于齐反舍于鲁是人也又请见温伯雪子曰往也蕲见我今也又蕲见我是必有以振我也出而见客入而叹明日见客又入而叹其仆曰每见之客也必入而叹何邪曰吾固告子矣中国之民明乎礼义而陋乎知人心昔之见我者进退一成规一成矩从容一若龙一若虎其諌我也似子其道我也似父是以叹也仲尼见之而不言子路曰吾子欲见温伯雪子久矣见之而不言何邪仲尼曰若夫人者目击而道存矣亦不可以容声矣 真人者敦兮若朴也旷兮若谷也渊兮似万物之宗也不可以智子久矣见之而不言何邪仲尼曰若夫人者目击而道存矣亦不可以容声矣 真人者敦兮若朴也旷兮若谷也渊兮似万物之宗也不可以智度不可以言接此温伯雪子之如此而仲尼见而不能言也夫仲尼见而不能言者心得也心得何假于言乎故曰亦不可以容声矣 颜渊问于仲尼曰 夫田无择之师与夫温伯雪子其道所以为得矣由未及于仲尼故以颜回称仲尼之道而言之仲尼之道至妙矣其所得得之于老聃故以孔子与老聃论道而次之也故无择之师不及温伯雪子温伯雪子不及于孔子孔子又师于老聃故第差一等而言之此庄子托数子之称师而论道以至于精也
Interpretation

Wen Bo Xuezi (the adept described in the text) was on his way to Qi and stopped over in Lu. Someone in Lu asked to see him. Wen Bo Xuezi said: No. I have heard that gentlemen of the Central Plains are skilled in ritual and propriety but clumsy at reading the human heart—I do not wish to meet him. When he returned from Qi and again lodged in Lu, the man once more requested an audience. Wen Bo Xuezi said: He asked to see me before and asks again now; he must have something that can stir me. He went out to receive the guest and, on returning, sighed. The next day he met the guest again and again sighed on coming back. His servant asked: Every time you see this visitor you sigh when you return—why? He said: I told you long ago. People of the Central Plains understand ritual and propriety but are poor at understanding the human heart. The man who saw me earlier moved in and out as straight as compass and square; in repose he seemed like a dragon or a tiger. He admonished me like a son and guided me like a father. That is why I sighed. Confucius (Zhongni) met him but said nothing. Zilu said: Master, you have long wished to see Wen Bo Xuezi—why, after meeting him, do you not speak? Confucius said: A person like this—when our eyes meet, the Dao is already there; there is no longer room for words.

The True Person (Zhenren)—one united with the Dao—is as solid as uncarved timber, as open as a valley, as deep as the root source of the ten thousand things; neither cunning measure nor verbal exchange can grasp him. Wen Bo Xuezi was just such a one, which is why Confucius, on meeting him, could not speak. Not to speak is because the heart has already understood; when the heart has understood, what need is there to rely on words? Hence it is said that sound can no longer find a place.

Yan Yuan questioned Confucius.

The teacher of Tian Wucuo (Tian Zifang) and Wen Bo Xuezi had both gained something of the Way, yet neither reached the level of Confucius; therefore the narrative has Yan Hui expound Confucius’s Way and develop it further. Confucius’s Way is utmost in subtlety; what he attained came from Lao Dan (Laozi), and so the text continues with Confucius and Lao Dan discussing the Dao. Wucuo’s teacher fell short of Wen Bo Xuezi, Wen Bo Xuezi fell short of Confucius, and Confucius in turn took Lao Dan as teacher—each step one grade lower. This is Zhuangzi’s device of having these figures praise and discuss teachers in layers, down to the finest point of the Dao.

夫子步亦步夫子趋亦趋夫子驰亦驰夫子奔绝尘而回瞠若乎后矣子托数子之称师而论道以至于精也 夫子步亦步夫子趋亦趋夫子驰亦驰夫子奔绝尘而回瞠若乎后矣夫子曰回何谓邪曰夫子步亦步也夫子言亦言也夫子趋亦趋也夫子辩亦辩也夫子驰亦驰也夫子言道回亦言道也及奔逸绝尘而回瞠若乎后者 仲尼者入于道也颜回者知于道也入于道者已至于真空此所以奔绝尘而不可以及也知于道者未达于真空此所以趋步驰骋而瞠若乎后也不可以及则独为于圣人瞠若其后则可以继圣人此仲尼所以为万世师而颜回所以为于亚圣也 夫子不言而信不比而周无器而民蹈乎前而不知所以然而已矣仲尼曰恶可不察与夫哀莫大于人此仲尼所以为万世师而颜回所以为于亚圣也 夫子不言而信不比而周无器而民蹈乎前而不知所以然而已矣仲尼曰恶可不察与夫哀莫大于心死而人死亦次之日出东方而入于西极万物莫不比方有目有趾者待是而后成功是出则存是入则亡万物亦然有待也而死有待也而生 孔子待物以其诚故不言而信也接下以其忠故不比而周也无爵而物最故无器而民也无位而物归故蹈乎前而不知所以然而已此夫子之所以圣者欤
Interpretation

Yan Hui said: “When my teacher walks slowly, I walk slowly; when he quickens his pace, I quicken mine; when he runs, I run. Once he races ahead and leaves the dust far behind, I can only stare wide-eyed and lag behind. It is by following this man whom the disciples call their teacher and discussing the Dao with him that I have been able to reach such subtle depth.”

Confucius asked, “Yan Hui, what do you mean by that?” Yan Hui replied, “When my teacher walks, I walk; when he speaks, I speak along with him; when he quickens his pace, I quicken mine; when he debates, I debate; when he runs, I run; when he expounds the Dao, I expound the Dao. But when he races ahead and leaves the dust far behind, I can only stare wide-eyed and fall behind.”

Zhongni had already entered the Dao; Yan Hui merely knew the Dao. One who has entered the Dao has arrived at true emptiness—the still, open state in which nothing is clung to—so he can race ahead and leave the dust behind, and others cannot catch up. One who knows the Dao has not yet reached that emptiness, so though he hurries and runs to keep up, he can only stare from behind. When others cannot catch up, that person stands alone as a sage; when someone can follow close behind, that person can inherit the sage’s place. Thus Confucius is the teacher of ten thousand generations, and Yan Hui is the sub-sage—the sage second only to Confucius.

Though the teacher does not speak, people still trust him; though he does not form private factions, he treats everyone broadly and evenly; though he holds no noble rank or ritual emblems of office, the common people come forward to follow him, without themselves knowing why. Confucius said, “How can one fail to examine this closely? Nothing is more lamentable than the death of the heart; the death of the body is secondary. The sun rises in the east and sets at the far west, and nothing among the ten thousand things fails to align with it. All who have eyes and feet must wait for it to rise before they can accomplish their tasks: when it comes out, the ten thousand things live; when it goes down, they perish. The ten thousand things are the same—they die because they depend on something, and live because they depend on something.”

Confucius treated the ten thousand things with sincerity, so even without speaking he could win trust; he treated those below him with deep loyalty, so even without favoritism he could reach everyone; without noble rank he was yet most revered, so without the insignia of office the people gathered to him; without position or power the ten thousand things came to him, so people walked before him without knowing why. That is why Confucius became a sage.

吾一受其成形而不化以待尽效物而动日夜无隙而不知其所终熏然其成形知命不能规乎其前丘以是日徂吾终身与女交一臂而失之可不哀与汝殆着乎吾所以着也彼已尽矣而汝求之以为有是求马于唐肆也吾服汝也甚忘汝服吾也亦甚忘虽然汝奚患焉虽忘乎故吾吾有不忘者存 真宰乎吾所以着也彼已尽矣而汝求之以为有是求马于唐肆也吾服汝也甚忘汝服吾也亦甚忘虽然汝奚患焉虽忘乎故吾吾有不忘者存 真宰之造物我所以受其成形而为我矣受其成形而不可以移易待其终极而后止此未足以免于忧累也故圣人达观而忘其形所以无我而已矣 孔子见老聃老聃新沐方将被发而干慹然似非人孔子便而待之少焉见曰丘也与其信然与向者先生形体掘若槁木似遗物离人而立于独也老聃曰吾游心于物之初孔子曰何谓邪曰心困焉而不能知口辟焉而不能言尝为汝议乎其将 夫物之初者无有也无有者道之真体而与物不耦矣老聃所以游之宜乎孔子称其形体如槁木似遗物离人而立于独也夫离人者出于非人之域也立于其将 夫物之初者无有也无有者道之真体而与物不耦矣老聃所以游之宜乎孔子称其形体如槁木似遗物离人而立于独也夫离人者出于非人之域也立于独者入于天而一也此老聃所以神妙欤
Interpretation

Once a person has received a physical form from the True Master (Zhenzai), that form can no longer be altered; it can only be maintained until life ends. People move in response to outer things, without rest day or night, yet do not know where they will ultimately return. Though the body is warmly alive, even one who understands fate cannot foresee what lies ahead. For this reason Kong Qiu felt that he was losing something of himself every day. My companionship with you in this life is like arms briefly touching and then missing each other—how can that not be sorrowful? You probably cling only to the outward traces I show. Those traces have long since vanished, yet you still treat them as something real to seek—like looking for a horse in a market where there are no horses at all. What I keep of you in my heart has largely faded; the same is true of you toward me. Even so, why need you worry? Though the “I” of the past is forgotten, something that cannot be forgotten still remains here.

The True Master fashioned things so that I received a form and became the person I am now. Once the form is fixed, it cannot be shifted; it must run its course until life reaches its end—yet that alone is not enough to shake off the drag of cares. Therefore the sage looks through things with clarity, forgets his own body, and in that way achieves no-self.

Confucius went to see Laozi. Laozi had just washed his hair and was drying it loose; he stood there blank and still, as if he were not a person of this world. Confucius withdrew to one side and waited; after a while he came forward and said: “Is it that my eyes are failing, Kong Qiu, or is it really so? A moment ago, Master, your body was stiff as dead wood, as if you had cast off outer things, left the crowd, and stood alone in utter solitude.” Laozi said: “I was letting my spirit roam in the beginning before things had taken shape.” Confucius asked: “What does that mean?” Laozi said: “When the heart is blocked, it cannot know; when the mouth is open, it cannot speak. Let me try to give you a rough account of its main drift.”

The beginning of all things is non-being (wu). Non-being is the true substance of the Dao (the Way); it is not paired or matched with anything. Laozi’s spirit roamed there—hence Confucius saw his body like dead wood, as though he had cast things aside, left others, and stood apart. To leave the crowd is to step beyond the realm of ordinary people; to stand in oneness is to enter the sphere where one is united with Heaven. That is precisely what makes Laozi so wondrous.

至阴肃肃至阳赫赫肃肃出乎天赫赫发乎地两者交通成和而物生焉或为之纪而莫见其形消息满虚一晦一明日改月化日有所为而莫见其功生有所乎萌死有所乎归始终相反乎无端而莫知乎其所穷非是也且孰为之宗 一阴一阳之谓道道生于阴阳阴阳分而道着然独阴不可成而独阳不可生必在交通然后万物生成矣故曰至阴肃肃至阳赫赫肃肃出乎天赫赫发乎地两者交通成和而物生焉夫天阳也地阴也肃肃出乎天赫赫发乎地见阴阳交通之地也 孔子曰请问游是老聃曰夫得是至美至乐也得至美而游乎至乐谓之至人 能全于道者所以能全于命命全则为乐莫大焉此老聃所以有至美至乐是老聃曰夫得是至美至乐也得至美而游乎至乐谓之至人 能全于道者所以能全于命命全则为乐莫大焉此老聃所以有至美至乐之言也夫道者天下之至美也命者万物之至乐也至美出于道而视之不见也至乐出于命而听之不闻也惟能入道则可全命惟能有美则可以有乐二者非至人不能备之矣故曰得至美而游乎至乐谓之至人
Interpretation

The utmost yin is cold and killing; the utmost yang is blazing and brilliant. The killing qi issues from heaven; the blazing qi rises from earth. When yin and yang meet and harmonize, the myriad things are thereby generated. Some would set order and measure for them, yet no form can be seen. Waning and waxing, fullness and emptiness, darkness and light—day by day they shift, month by month they transform; each day there is activity, yet no achievement appears. Life has a place where it sprouts; death has a place where it returns. Beginning and end oppose and join each other, without starting thread and without known end. If it were not this Dao, who could be lord of the myriad things?

One yin and one yang—that is called the Dao. The Dao is born from yin and yang; when yin and yang divide, the Dao becomes manifest. Yin alone cannot complete; yang alone cannot generate—there must be meeting and interchange before the myriad things can be born. Hence it is said: the utmost yin is solemn, the utmost yang is resplendent; the solemn emerges from heaven, the resplendent issues from earth; the two interchange in harmony and things are born. Heaven belongs to yang, earth to yin; yin qi issues from heaven and yang qi rises from earth—right there is where yin and yang meet.

Kongzi asked: How does one wander the heart in this? Laozi (La Dan) said: To obtain this is supreme beauty and supreme joy. To obtain supreme beauty and roam in supreme joy—that is called the perfected person (zhiren), one who accords with the Dao.

Only by fully accord with the Dao can one fully preserve nature and life (xingming); when nature and life are preserved, that is the greatest joy. So Laozi spoke of supreme beauty and supreme joy: to obtain it is supreme beauty and supreme joy; to obtain supreme beauty and roam in supreme joy is called the perfected person.

Because one fully accords with the Dao, one can preserve nature and life; when the mandate-life is whole, there is no joy greater. The Dao is the supreme beauty under heaven; life-mandate (ming) is the supreme joy of the myriad things. Supreme beauty arises from the Dao—look yet you cannot see it; supreme joy arises from the mandate—listen yet you cannot hear it. Only by entering the Dao can the mandate be made whole; only where there is beauty can there be joy. These two—no one but the perfected person can possess both fully. Hence it is said: to obtain supreme beauty and roam in supreme joy is called the perfected person.

孔子曰愿闻其方曰草食之兽不疾易薮水生之虫不疾易渊行少变而不失其大常也喜怒哀乐不入于胸次夫天下也者万物之所一也得其所一而同焉则四支百体将为尘垢而死生终始将为昼夜而莫之能滑而况得丧祸福之所介乎弃者若弃泥涂知身贵于也贵在于我而不失于所一也得其所一而同焉则四支百体将为尘垢而死生终始将为昼夜而莫之能滑而况得丧祸福之所介乎弃者若弃泥涂知身贵于也贵在于我而不失于变且万化而未始有极也夫孰足以患心已为道者解乎此 天地万物同出于道而得一也人能明得一之妙则无为无为则无我无我则形骸如遗土死生为往来皆不能为累于我矣岂得失利害可以介虿于心欤故曰夫天下也者万物之所一也得其所一而同焉则四支百体皆为尘垢而死生终始将为昼夜而莫之能滑而况得防祸福之所介乎 孔子曰夫子德配天地而犹假至言以修心古之君子孰能脱焉老聃曰不然夫水之于汋也无为而才自然矣至人之于德也不修而物不能离焉若天之自高地之自厚日月之自明夫何修焉孔子出以告颜回曰丘之于道也其犹酰鸡与防夫子之发吾覆也吾不知天地之大全也 缺传
Interpretation

Confucius said: I wish to hear the reasoning behind this. The reply was: Beasts that eat grass do not feel distressed when they move to another meadow; creatures of the water do not feel unsettled when they shift to another deep pool. One’s conduct may change in small ways without losing the great constancy—the law that all things uphold and that never changes. Joy, anger, sorrow, and delight do not enter the heart. The world under Heaven is originally the One to which all things belong in common. If a person attains this One and merges with all things as one, then limbs and body are as negligible as dust; death and life, end and beginning are like the alternation of day and night—nothing can disturb him. How much less can gain and loss, fortune and misfortune—petty matters that stand in between—do so? Casting off what is external and attached is like casting off mud, because one knows that the self is more precious than such attachments. What is precious is oneself, yet without losing the One one upholds amid change. Moreover, the myriad things transform without end; what is there worth troubling the mind over? One who has awakened to the great Dao understands this principle.

All things under Heaven and Earth arise from the Dao and thus return together to the One. If one understands the subtlety of “attaining the One,” one practices Wuwei (non-action); in Wuwei there is no private self; without a private self, the body is like discarded mud, and death and life, coming and going, cannot encumber one. How then could gain and loss or benefit and harm lodge in the heart like a tiny sting? Therefore it is said: the world under Heaven is the One that all things share in common. Obtaining it and becoming one with things, the four limbs and hundred parts of the body are all mere filth; death, life, end, and beginning are like day and night and cannot unsettle one—still less can gain and loss and fortune and misfortune, which intervene between, do so.

Confucius said: The Master’s virtue is sufficient to match Heaven and Earth, yet you still rely on the highest teaching to cultivate the inner mind. Which ancient gentleman could avoid doing the same? Laozi said: It is not so. Water wells up naturally without human contrivance, and its quality is already complete in itself. For the perfected person (zhiren), virtue likewise needs no deliberate cultivation; yet the myriad things cannot do without him—just as Heaven is naturally high, Earth naturally thick, and sun and moon naturally bright. What need is there to cultivate? Confucius went out and told Yan Hui: In regard to the Dao, I am like the vinegar-gnat in the jar (xiji—a metaphor for one whose vision is blocked and scope is narrow). Had the Master not lifted the covering that shrouded me, I would not have known that Heaven and Earth are so vast and complete.

之自明夫何修焉孔子出以告颜回曰丘之于道也其犹酰鸡与防夫子之发吾覆也吾不知天地之大全也 缺传 庄子见鲁哀公哀公曰鲁多儒士少为先生方者庄子曰鲁少儒哀公曰举鲁国而儒服何谓少乎庄子曰周闻之儒者冠圜冠者知天时履句屦者知地形缓佩玦者事至而断君子有其道者未必为其服也为其服者未必知其道也公固以为不然何不号于国中曰无此道而为此服者其罪死于是哀公号之五日而鲁国无敢儒服者独有一丈夫儒服而立乎公门公即召而问以国事千转万变而不穷庄子曰以鲁国而儒者一人耳可谓多乎百里奚爵禄不入于心故饭牛而牛肥使秦穆公忘其贱与之政也有虞氏死生不入于心故足以动人宋元君将画图众史皆至受揖而立舐笔和墨在外者半有一史后至者儃儃然不趋受揖不立因之舍公使人视之则解衣般礴裸君曰可矣是真画者也文王观于臧见一丈夫钓至者儃儃然不趋受揖不立因之舍公使人视之则解衣般礴裸君曰可矣是真画者也文王观于臧见一丈夫钓而其钓莫钓非持其钓有钓者也常钓也文王欲举而授之政而恐大臣父兄之弗安也欲终而释之而不忍百姓之无天也于是旦而属之大夫曰昔者寡人梦见良人黑色而乘驳马而偏朱蹄号曰寓而政于臧丈人庶几乎民有瘳乎诸大夫蹴然曰先君王也文王曰然则卜之诸大夫曰先君之命王其无他又何卜焉遂迎臧丈人而授之政典法无更偏令无出三年文王观于国则列士坏植散群长官者不成德螤斛不敢入于四境列士坏植散群则尚同也长官者不授之政典法无更偏令无出三年文王观于国则列士坏植散群长官者不成德螤斛不敢入于四境列士坏植散群则尚同也长官者不成德则同务也螤斛不敢入于四境则诸侯无二心也文王于是焉以为太师北面而问曰政可以及天下乎臧丈人昧然而不应泛然而辞朝令而夜遁终身无闻颜渊问于仲尼曰文王其犹未邪又何以梦为乎仲尼曰默汝无言夫文王尽之也而又何论刺焉彼直以循斯须也
Interpretation

Zhuangzi went to see Duke Ai of Lu. The duke said, “In Lu there are many Ru scholars, but few who study your Way.” Zhuangzi replied, “In fact there are few Ru in Lu.” The duke said, “The whole country wears Ru robes—how can you say they are few?” Zhuangzi said, “I, Zhuang Zhou, have heard that Ru wear round caps because they understand celestial timing; they wear square-toed shoes (juli) because they understand terrain; and they hang a jade ring with a notch (jue, symbolizing decisiveness) at the belt because when a matter arises they can decide at once. A gentleman who truly has the Way may not dress in this garb at all, and those who dress in it may not truly understand the Way. If Your Highness will not believe this, why not issue an order throughout the realm: anyone who wears this dress without possessing this Way shall be sentenced to death?” After the duke issued the order, within five days no one in Lu dared wear Ru robes anymore—except one man in Ru dress standing at the palace gate. The duke summoned him and tested him with affairs of state; however the questions changed, he could not be stumped. Zhuangzi said, “In all Lu there is only this one genuine Ru—can that be called many?”

Baili Xi had no rank or salary in his heart, so he tended cattle; the cattle grew fat, and Duke Mu of Qin therefore forgot his humble origins and entrusted him with government. Youyu Shi (Shun) had no fixation on life and death in his heart, and so he could move people’s hearts.

Duke Yuan of Song was about to have a painting session. The painters all arrived, bowed to the ruler, and stood at attention; they licked their brushes and adjusted their ink, and half of them still waited outside. One painter arrived late, walked slowly and did not hurry forward; after bowing he did not stand waiting but went straight back to his lodging. The duke sent someone to look in on him and found that he had stripped off his clothes, sat with legs apart at ease, entirely naked. Duke Yuan said, “Enough—this is the true painter.”

King Wen of Zhou was touring in Zang when he saw a man fishing. Though he held a line, he seemed not to be fishing at all; it was not that he gripped tackle while his mind fixed on a catch, but that his mind stayed constant and he fished without deliberate intent. Wen wished to employ him and hand over government, yet feared his ministers and elders would be uneasy; he wished to let the matter drop, yet could not bear that the people should lack someone to rely on. So one morning he told the grand officers, “Last night I dreamed of a worthy man: a dark face, a beard, riding a piebald horse with one hoof red. He charged me: ‘Entrust government to the old man of Zang—then the people may nearly be saved!’” The officers said in alarm, “That was the former king.” Wen said, “Then let us divined about it.” They said, “This is the former ruler’s command; Your Majesty need not doubt further—why divined at all?” So they welcomed the old man of Zang and gave him the administration. He did not alter the existing statutes nor issue partial or private orders. After three years Wen looked over the realm and saw scholars breaking up factions and cliques, local chiefs no longer advertising their own merit, and foreign measures that did not match the standard daring not enter the borders. Scholars dissolved factions because they valued shared purpose; chiefs did not make their own virtue a banner because they served one common task; measures did not enter the borders because the feudal lords had no divided hearts. Wen then appointed him Grand Tutor and, facing north in the posture of a subject, asked, “Can such government be extended to all under Heaven?” The old man of Zang looked indifferent and did not answer; he took leave casually—in the morning he had received his charge, by night he had fled, and afterward was never heard from again.

Yan Hui asked Zhongni (Confucius), “Was King Wen not already perfect? Why did he still need to pretend it was a dream?” Confucius said, “Stop—say no more. Wen had already done what was complete—what is there to criticize? He was only following the crowd and yielding for the moment.”

夫鲁国之多儒周之多臣及其所得则乃一儒一丈夫矣故鲁得一儒而哀公问之国事则千转万变而不穷周得一丈夫而文王授之政则四境诸侯无二心是二人者得于心者充足而为于外者有余所谓全才而德不形故庄子言于此篇矣 列御防为伯昏无人射引之盈贯措杯水其肘上发之适矢复沓方矢复寓当是时犹象人也伯昏无人曰是射之射非不射之射也尝与汝登高山履危石临百仞之渊若能射乎于是无人遂登高山履危石临百仞之渊背逡象人也伯昏无人曰是射之射非不射之射也尝与汝登高山履危石临百仞之渊若能射乎于是无人遂登高山履危石临百仞之渊背逡巡足二分垂在外揖御防而进之御防伏地汗流至踵伯昏无人曰夫至人者上窥青天下潜黄泉挥斥八极神气不变今汝怵然有恂目之志尔于中也殆矣夫 至人者潜行而不窒所入而皆得放心于天地之外而不入于形器之内忘于危险而岂有惮慑欤此伯昏无人所以言其窥青天潜黄泉挥斥八极而神气不能变也
Interpretation

Lu had many Confucian scholars and Zhou had many ministers of the royal house, yet only one true Confucian and one true gentleman truly attained the Way. Lu gained that true Confucian: when Duke Ai of Lu asked him about affairs of state, he could respond in endlessly varied ways. Zhou gained that true gentleman: when King Wen entrusted him with governance, the feudal lords of the four quarters held no divided loyalty. In both men inner fullness left surplus for outward action—they were complete in talent, yet their virtue did not show on the surface. That is why Zhuangzi speaks of them in this chapter.

Lie Yukou (Liezi) was shooting for Bo Hun Wu Ren (a master who embodied the Way). With the bow fully drawn and a cup of water balanced on his elbow, he loosed one arrow after another: as one left the string, the next was already nocked. He stood as still as a puppet. Bo Hun Wu Ren said: “This is shooting with deliberate intent—it is not shooting without mind. Suppose you climbed a high mountain, stood on a crumbling ledge with a hundred-zhang abyss below—could you still shoot?” So he climbed the mountain, stepped onto the perilous rock, and faced the chasm; backing toward the void until two tenths of his foot hung over the edge, he bowed and invited Liezi to come forward. Liezi fell prostrate, sweat streaming to his heels. Bo Hun Wu Ren said: “The perfected person (zhiren) can gaze up at the blue sky, dive down to the yellow springs, and move freely through the eight extremes, yet his spirit and bearing do not change. Now you are so frightened that your gaze wavers—your inner heart is already in danger.”

The perfected person moves submerged through the world without being blocked; wherever he goes he is at ease. He settles his heart beyond Heaven and Earth and does not drop it into visible things; even peril is forgotten—how then could he fear? That is the meaning of Bo Hun Wu Ren’s saying that one can look up at the blue sky, down to the yellow springs, and sweep through the eight extremes while spirit and bearing stay unchanged.

Jian Wu asked Sun Shu Ao (a worthy minister of Chu): “You served three times as lingyin (chief minister of Chu) without seeming elated, and three times you left office without regret; when you stood in danger, were you ever afraid?” This carries the same point as Bo Hun Wu Ren’s words about gazing at the blue sky, diving to the yellow springs, and moving through the eight extremes without change in spirit and bearing.

肩吾问于孙叔敖曰子三为令尹而不荣华三去于危险而岂有惮慑欤此伯昏无人所以言其窥青天潜黄泉挥斥八极而神气不能变也 肩吾问于孙叔敖曰子三为令尹而不荣华三去之而无忧色吾始也疑子今视子之鼻间栩栩然子之用心独奈何孙叔敖曰吾何以过人哉吾以其来不可却也其去不可止也吾以为得失之非我也而无忧色而已矣我何以过人哉且不知其在彼乎其在我乎其在彼邪亡乎我在我邪亡乎彼方将踌躇方将四顾何暇知乎人贵人贱哉仲尼闻之曰古之真人知者不得说美人不得滥盗人不得劫伏戏黄帝不得友死生亦大矣而无变乎已况爵禄乎若然者其神经乎大山而无介入乎渊泉而不濡处卑细而不惫充不得劫伏戏黄帝不得友死生亦大矣而无变乎已况爵禄乎若然者其神经乎大山而无介入乎渊泉而不濡处卑细而不惫充满天地既以与人已愈有楚王与凡君坐少焉楚王左右曰凡亡者三凡君曰凡之亡也不足以丧吾存夫凡之亡不足以丧吾存则楚之存不足以存存由是观之则凡未始亡而楚未始存也 至人者以形骸为寓寄生死为往来而况爵禄轩冕之外物乎此孙叔敖所以三仕三去而无荣华忧色也夫爵禄轩冕物之来寄也其来不可却其去不可止来去在彼而不在我故曰吾以得失之非我也得失之非我则又何忧喜于其间故曰而无忧色而已矣此叔敖之能忘于外物孔子所以引古之真人而称之也 知北游篇
Interpretation

Jian Wu asked Sun Shu-ao: “You served three times as chief minister—the highest administrative officer of Chu—and showed no sign of pride; you left office three times and wore no look of grief. At first I doubted you, but now I see your breath easy and your bearing relaxed. What is going on inside you?”

Sun Shu-ao said: “What do I have that others lack? I only hold that when office comes, it cannot be refused; when it goes, it cannot be held back. I treat gain and loss as not belonging to me, so I simply have no look of worry. What else is special about me? Besides, I do not know whether nobility and baseness lie in outer things or in myself: if in outer things, they are not mine; if in me, they are not in outer things. I am at ease, looking all around—where would I find time to fuss over others’ high or low station?”

When Confucius heard this, he said: “The True Person of old—clever debaters could not argue him down, beauty could not seduce him, robbers could not coerce him; even Fuxi and the Yellow Emperor could not befriend him on equal terms. Life and death are already the greatest changes, yet they could not alter his self—how much less rank and salary? Such a person’s spirit would not be blocked by great mountains, would not be soaked entering deep springs, would not be trapped in lowly places; he fills heaven and earth. Having given everything to others, he himself is all the more full.”

The king of Chu sat with the lord of Fan. Before long, attendants of the king of Chu three times announced that Fan had fallen. The lord of Fan said: “The fall of Fan is not enough to destroy what I preserve within. If the loss of Fan cannot make me lose my inner being, then the survival of Chu is not enough to secure that inner being either. Seen this way, Fan was never truly destroyed, and Chu was never truly secure.”

The Perfect Person treats the body as a temporary lodging and life and death as comings and goings—how much more so rank, salary, and the carriage and cap of high office, which are outer things? So Sun Shu-ao, three times in office and three times out, showed neither pride nor grief. Rank, salary, and emblems of office are only things temporarily lent from outside: when they come you cannot reject them, when they go you cannot stop them; coming and going depend on outer things, not on me—therefore gain and loss do not belong to me. Since gain and loss do not belong to me, why rejoice or grieve over them? Hence he said he simply had no look of worry. This is how Sun Shu-ao could forget outer things—and Confucius cited the ancient True Person to praise him.

“Knowledge Rambling in the North” (Zhi Beiyou) is the title of the chapter to which this passage belongs.

夫窈寂寞希夷防妙者至道之真体体固不可以情求不可以智窥惟以无知而为得矣庄子因而作知北游篇 知北游于水之上登隐弅之丘而适遭无为谓焉知窥惟以无知而为得矣庄子因而作知北游篇 知北游于水之上登隐弅之丘而适遭无为谓焉知谓无为谓曰予欲有问乎若何思何虑则知道何处何服则安道何从何道则得道三问而无为谓不答也非不答不知答也知不得问反于白水之南登狐阕之上而睹狂屈焉知以之言也问乎狂屈狂屈曰唉予知之将语若中欲言而忘其所欲言知不得问反于帝宫见黄帝而问焉黄帝曰无思无虑始知道无处无服始安道无从无道始得道知问黄帝曰我与若知之彼与彼不知也其孰是耶黄帝曰彼无为谓真是也狂屈似之我与汝终不近也夫知者不言言者不知故圣人行不言之教道不可致德不可至仁可为也义可亏也礼相伪也故曰失道不近也夫知者不言言者不知故圣人行不言之教道不可致德不可至仁可为也义可亏也礼相伪也故曰失道而后德失德而后仁失仁而后义失义而后礼礼者道之华而乱之首也故曰为道者日损损之又损之以至于无为无为而无不为也今已为物也欲复归根不亦难乎其易也其唯大人乎生也死之徒死也生之始孰知其纪人之生气之聚也聚则为生散则为死若死生为徒吾又何患故万物一也是其所美者为神奇其所恶者为臭腐臭腐复化为神奇神奇复化为臭腐故曰通天下一气耳圣人故贵一知谓黄帝曰吾问无为谓无为谓不应我非不我应不知应我也吾问狂屈狂屈中欲告我而不我告非不我告中欲告而忘之也今予问乎若若知之奚故不近黄帝曰彼其真是也以其不知也此其似之也以其忘之也予与若终不近也以其知之也狂屈闻之以黄帝为知言夫智者言其阳明也北者言其阴晦也能不用明而自晦以其忘之也予与若终不近也以其知之也狂屈闻之以黄帝为知言夫智者言其阳明也北者言其阴晦也能不用明而自晦则入于至道之妙也故曰知北游于水之上隐弅之丘适遭无为谓焉故无为者未免于有为也未免于有为则岂足以知道此所以不答知之所问也智以无为之不答复之阳明而所以决其所问焉故曰反于白水之南登狐阕之上而暏狂屈焉白水之南者言阳明也狐阕之上者言中心疑而不果也狂者言其有所取屈者言其有所伸亦未为于无为也未为于无为则亦不足以知于道此所以答智以予知之将告若之言也智以二子皆不知道也非圣人不可以明故复之帝宫而问黄帝焉黄帝者圣人也足以知其至道矣夫何思何虑者无心也何处何服者无体也何从何道者无方也无心所以言至虚无体所以言真空无方所以言至妙至虚者道之所集也故曰则知道真空者道之所存也故曰则安道至言至虚无体所以言真空无方所以言至妙至虚者道之所集也故曰则知道真空者道之所存也故曰则安道至妙者道之所在也故曰则得道此三者非圣人不能以知之故黄帝曰我与若知之彼与彼不知也无为狂屈者皆庄子制名而寓意
Interpretation

That which is deep, silent, subtle, and abstruse is the true substance of the utmost Dao. This substance cannot be grasped through emotion or probed with cleverness; only through “not-knowing” can it be attained. Zhuangzi therefore wrote the chapter “Knowledge’s Journey North.”

Knowledge (a allegorical figure standing for cleverness) wandered north and came to the dark waters of Xuan, climbed the hill of Yinmie (hidden and secluded), and there met Wuwei Wei (a name meaning “no acting, nothing to say”). Knowledge asked him three times: By what thinking and scheming can one know the Dao? Where to dwell and what to do to rest in the Dao? What to follow and what path to take to obtain the Dao? Wuwei Wei did not answer—not because he refused, but because he did not know how to answer.

Unable to get an answer, Knowledge returned south of the White Waters, climbed Fox Knoll, and saw Kuang Qu (a name suggesting both striving forward and bending back). He asked the same questions. Kuang Qu said, “Ah, I know—I was just about to tell you,” but halfway through he forgot what he meant to say.

Still without an answer, Knowledge went to the Yellow Emperor’s palace and asked him. The Yellow Emperor said: Without thinking or scheming, one begins to know the Dao; without fixed dwelling or particular conduct, one begins to rest in the Dao; without leaning on anything or following a path, one begins to obtain the Dao. Knowledge asked again: You and I know, while those two do not—who is right? The Yellow Emperor said: Wuwei Wei is truly right; Kuang Qu only approximates it; you and I in the end still fall short. Those who know do not speak; those who speak do not truly know—therefore the sage teaches through wordless instruction. The Dao cannot be summoned; De cannot be forced into attainment. Benevolence can still be practiced, righteousness can be trimmed back, but ritual is mutual pretense and ornament. Hence it is said: When the Dao is lost, one speaks of De; when De is lost, one speaks of benevolence; when benevolence is lost, one speaks of righteousness; when righteousness is lost, one speaks of ritual. Ritual is the gaudy surface of the Dao and the beginning of disorder. Therefore one who seeks the Dao daily reduces and reduces until reaching wuwei (non-action); in wuwei, nothing remains undone.

Now that we have already become formed things, wishing to return to the root—is that not hard? To make it easy, perhaps only the “great person” (one who has attained the Dao) can do so. Life is death’s companion; death is life’s beginning—who knows their thread? Human life is the gathering of qi: when qi gathers, there is life; when qi scatters, there is death. If birth and death are seen as following the same kind, what is there to worry about? Thus the myriad things are originally one body. What people love is called wondrous; what they hate is called foul. Foul turns again to wondrous; wondrous turns again to foul. Hence it is said: What penetrates the world is a single flow of qi. The sage therefore values this “oneness.”

Knowledge said to the Yellow Emperor: I asked Wuwei Wei; he did not respond—not because he refused me, but because he did not know how to respond. I asked Kuang Qu; he was about to tell me but could not finish—not because he refused me, but because he forgot while trying to speak. Now I ask you, and you know—why do you say you still fall short of the Dao? The Yellow Emperor said: Wuwei Wei is truly right precisely because he does not know; Kuang Qu only approximates precisely because he forgot; you and I in the end fall short precisely because we know. When Kuang Qu heard this, he took the Yellow Emperor’s words as understanding how speech works.

“Knowledge” names yang brightness; “north” names yin obscurity. Only by not using brightness and instead hiding in obscurity can one enter the depths of the utmost Dao. Hence the story places Knowledge’s northward journey on the dark waters and the hill of Yinmie, where he meets Wuwei Wei. One named Wuwei has not yet escaped being “someone who acts”; not having escaped acting, how can that suffice to know the Dao? That is why he does not answer. Because he did not answer, Knowledge returned to the place of yang brightness to resolve his doubt—hence returning south of the White Waters, climbing Fox Knoll, and seeing Kuang Qu. South of the White Waters indicates yang brightness; atop Fox Knoll indicates doubt in the heart that cannot be decided. “Kuang” is seeking; “Qu” is bending—still not wuwei; not wuwei, again not enough to know the Dao—so he only says, “I know—I was just about to tell you.” Knowledge thought those two did not know; without a sage one cannot clarify, so he went to the Yellow Emperor’s palace. The Yellow Emperor is a sage, adequate to know the utmost Dao.

“What thinking, what scheming” is no-mind; “where to dwell, what to wear/do” is no fixed form; “what to follow, what path” is no fixed direction. No-mind speaks of utmost emptiness; no form speaks of true emptiness; no direction speaks of utmost subtlety. Utmost emptiness is where the Dao gathers—hence one can know the Dao; true emptiness is where the Dao abides—hence one can rest in the Dao; utmost subtlety is where the Dao resides—hence one can obtain the Dao. These three levels—only a sage can know them; therefore the Yellow Emperor said: You and I know, those two do not. Wuwei Wei and Kuang Qu are names Zhuangzi invented to carry his meaning.

天地有大美而不言四时有明法而不议万物有成理而不说圣人者原天地之美而达万物之理是故至人无为大圣不作观于天地之谓也今彼神明至精与彼百化物已死生方圆莫知其根也扁然而万物自古以固存六合为巨未离其内秋毫为小待之成体天下莫不沈浮终身不故阴阳四时运行各得其序惛然若亡而存油然不形而神万物畜而不知此之谓本根可以观于天矣 知道者不言言者不知故天地自道而生而未尝谕人以覆载之功四时随道而行而未尝告人以寒暑之期万物由道而出未尝语人以生成之理圣人者与天地合其德与四时合其序曲通万物之情而与道冥防未尝谆谆然以谕人矣故生成之理圣人者与天地合其德与四时合其序曲通万物之情而与道冥防未尝谆谆然以谕人矣故曰圣人者原天地之美而达万物之理是故至人无为者任其自然而无所为也大圣不作者付之自成而无所作也此至人圣人合天地之不言也故曰观于天地之谓也
Interpretation

Heaven and earth hold supreme beauty yet do not speak; the four seasons have clear norms yet do not discuss; the ten thousand things each have their settled patterns yet do not explain. The sage traces heaven and earth’s great beauty and thereby penetrates the principle of the ten thousand things. Thus the perfected person takes no deliberate action, and the great sage does not contrive—meaning they observe and take heaven and earth as their model. Spirit reaches the utmost subtlety and moves with every change among the ten thousand things. Things die or live, square or round—no one knows their source. The ten thousand things flourish vigorously; from ancient times they have simply been thus. Though the six directions are vast, nothing lies beyond this; though autumn down is fine, it takes this to take form. Nothing under heaven fails to rise and sink with the times, never staying in an old shape for life. Yin and yang and the four seasons turn, each in due order. It is dim and unclear—seeming gone yet still there; it surges naturally, without showing form yet with wondrous efficacy. The ten thousand things are nourished by it yet do not know it—this is called the root source, and from here one may observe the Way of Heaven.

Those who truly know the Way do not proclaim it; those eager to proclaim it do not truly know. Heaven and earth are born from the Way yet never declare to people the merit of covering and bearing the ten thousand things; the four seasons run with the Way yet never tell people when cold and heat will come; the ten thousand things are transformed from the Way yet do not explain to people the principle of their arising. The sage’s virtue aligns with heaven and earth, his sequence with the four seasons; he subtly threads through the real situation of the ten thousand things and secretly accords with and holds the Way, never lecturing people at length. So it is said: the sage traces heaven and earth’s great beauty and penetrates the principle of the ten thousand things. The perfected person’s wuwei is to leave things to nature and not act with contrivance; the great sage’s non-doing is to let things complete themselves and not manufacture on his own. This is the perfected person and great sage matching heaven and earth’s way of not speaking—observing and taking heaven and earth as model.

啮缺问道乎被衣被衣曰若正汝形一汝视天和将至摄汝知一汝度神将来舍德将为汝美道将为汝居汝瞳焉如新生之犊而无求其故言未卒啮缺睡寐被衣大说行歌而去之曰形若槁骸心若死灰真其实知不以故自持媒媒晦晦无心而不瞳焉如新生之犊而无求其故言未卒啮缺睡寐被衣大说行歌而去之曰形若槁骸心若死灰真其实知不以故自持媒媒晦晦无心而不可与谋彼何人哉正汝形者使之无劳汝形也一汝视者使之不见可欲也无劳汝形则形全也不见可欲则精复也形全精复则与天为一矣故曰天和将至摄汝知者使之无思无为也一汝度者使之不益不损也无思无为则反朴也不益不损则全纯也反朴全纯则其神不亏矣故曰神将来舍德将为汝美者游于自得之场也道将为汝居者处于至虚之域也瞳焉如新生之犊而无求其故所谓复归于初也此皆入道之真理故啮缺遽悟而心得之此所以听言未卒而睡寐也 舜问乎丞曰道可得而有乎曰汝身非汝有也汝何得有夫道舜曰吾身非吾有也孰有之哉曰是天地之委形也生以听言未卒而睡寐也
Interpretation

Nieque asked Beiyi about the Dao. Beiyi said: Straighten your form and fix your gaze in one place, and the natural harmony of qi will arrive; put away your cleverness and align your measure, and spirit will come to dwell within you. De will complete your inner goodness, and the Dao will be the place where you abide. Your eyes will be clear like those of a newborn calf, and you will no longer chase after the reasons of things. Before he had finished speaking, Nieque had fallen asleep. Beiyi was greatly pleased and left, singing. In his song he said: The body is like withered bones, the heart like extinguished ashes; he truly knows, yet does not hold himself by old fixed views; dim and without scheming, one cannot plot with him—what kind of person is this!

To straighten the form is to keep the body from weariness; to fix the gaze in one place is to keep one from seeing things worth coveting. When the body is not worn out, the form is preserved; when one does not see covetable things, spirit returns. When form is whole and essence restored, one merges with Heaven as one, and so it is said that natural harmony will arrive. To put away cleverness is to be without thought and without contrived action (wusi wuwei); to align one’s measure is neither to add wrongly nor to subtract wrongly. Without thought and without contrived action, one returns to simplicity; neither adding nor subtractting, one preserves unity. Returning to simplicity while remaining whole, spirit is not depleted—hence it is said that spirit will come to dwell. That De completes your goodness is to move in the ease of a settled heart; that the Dao is your dwelling is to abide in the utmost empty stillness. Eyes like a newborn calf, no longer asking for original causes—that is returning to the first natural state. These are the real principles of entering the Dao, so Nieque suddenly understood in his heart and, before the words were finished, had fallen asleep.

Shun asked Cheng: Can the Dao be taken and possessed as one’s own? The answer was: Your body is not even yours—how could you possess the Dao? Shun said: If my body is not mine, whose is it? The answer was: It is the form entrusted to you by Heaven and Earth. Speaking of life—the words were not yet complete when the person had already fallen asleep.

舜问乎丞曰道可得而有乎曰汝身非汝有也汝何得有夫道舜曰吾身非吾有也孰有之哉曰是天地之委形也生非汝有是天地之委和也性命非汝有是天地之委顺也孙子非汝有是天地之委蜕也故行不知所往处不知所持食不知所味天地之疆阳气也又胡可得而有邪 缺传
Interpretation

Shun asked Cheng (an ancient official title; some say he was Shun’s teacher): “Can the Dao be obtained and held as one’s own?” Cheng replied: “Your body does not even belong to you—how then could you possess the Dao?” Shun asked: “If my body is not mine, who does it belong to?” Cheng said: “It is the bodily form entrusted by Heaven and Earth. Life is not yours—it is the harmonious qi entrusted by Heaven and Earth. Nature and destiny are not yours—they are the yielding transformation entrusted by Heaven and Earth. Even your descendants are not yours—they are what Heaven and Earth entrust, like shells left behind after a molt. So when you walk, you do not know where you are going; when you dwell, you do not know what you are holding; when you eat, you do not know the taste. All of this is the movement of the strong Yang qi between Heaven and Earth—how then could it be possessed?”

孔子问于老聃曰今日晏间敢问至道老聃曰汝斋戒防瀹而心澡雪而精神掊击而知夫道窅然难言哉将为汝言其崖略夫昭昭生于防防有伦生于无形精神生于道形本生于精而万物以形相生故九窍者胎生八窍者卵生其来无迹其往无崖无门无房四达之皇皇也邀于此者四枝强思虑恂达耳目聪明其用心不劳其应物无方天不得不高地不得不广日月不得不行万物不得不昌此其道与且夫博之不必知辩之不必慧圣人以断之矣若夫益之而不加益损之而不加损者圣人之所保也渊渊乎其若海魏魏乎其终则复始也运量万物而不必知辩之不必慧圣人以断之矣若夫益之而不加益损之而不加损者圣人之所保也渊渊乎其若海魏魏乎其终则复始也运量万物而不匮则君子之道彼其外与万物皆往资焉而不匮此其道与中国有人焉非阴非阳处于天地之间直且为人将反于宗自本观之生者喑醷物也虽有寿夭相去几何湏防之说也奚足以为尧桀之是非果蓏有理人伦虽难所以相齿圣人遭之而不违过之而不守调而应之德也偶而应之道也帝之所兴王之所起也人生天地之间若白驹之过郄忽然而已注然勃然莫不出焉油然漻然莫不入焉已化而生又化而死生物哀之人悲之解其天堕其天帙纷乎宛乎魂魄将往乃身从之乃大归乎不形之形形之不形是人之所同知也非之人悲之解其天堕其天帙纷乎宛乎魂魄将往乃身从之乃大归乎不形之形形之不形是人之所同知也非将至之所务也此众人之所同论也彼至则不论论则不至明见无值辩不若默道不可闻闻不若塞此之谓大得
Interpretation

When Confucius had leisure, he asked Laozi (Lao Dan) about the highest Dao. Laozi said: First undertake fasting and purification—the preparation before one may hear the Great Dao: open and clear the heart-mind, wash the spirit clean, and cast off cleverness and artifice. The Dao is dark and abysmal and hard to put into words; I can only sketch its general outline for you.

Manifest brightness is born from obscurity; ordered things arise from the formless. Spirit (Shen) is born from the Dao; the root of the bodily form is born from essence and Qi (Jing and Qi); and the ten thousand things, through their forms, further beget one another. What has nine apertures (mostly humans and beasts) is womb-born; what has eight apertures (mostly birds) is egg-born. When it comes there is no trace; when it goes there is no limit. It has no gate, court, or room, yet it opens on every side—vast and unobstructed. Those who can unite with it have strong limbs, penetrating thought, and keen ears and eyes; the mind is used without strain, and in meeting things there is no fixed method. Heaven cannot but be high, earth cannot but be broad, sun and moon cannot but run their courses, and the ten thousand things cannot but flourish—this is the Dao.

Wide learning does not necessarily mean genuine knowing; skill in debate does not necessarily mean wisdom—the sage has already abandoned such pursuits. What the sage holds to is that which, when you add to it, is not further increased, and when you diminish it, is not further diminished. It is deep as the sea, lofty and vast, yet turns and cycles; it moves and carries the ten thousand things without being exhausted. Seen in this light, even the way of the noble person still lies within its scope. All things draw from it, yet it is never used up—this is the Dao.

In the Central Kingdom (here, the human world of the middle realm) there are such beings: neither yin nor yang alone, placed between heaven and earth—temporarily human, yet destined in the end to return to the root. Fundamentally, life is only something obscure and murky—Qi briefly gathered, a dim, unclear mass. Even if long life and short life differ, how great is the gap? It is merely a way of speaking of an instant—far too slight to settle the rights and wrongs of Yao (the sage king) and Jie (the tyrant). Melons and fruits each have their own pattern; though human relations are difficult, from this too an order of priority and sequence arises. The sage, when he meets things, does not oppose them; when he passes through, he does not cling. Harmonizing and yielding is De (Virtue/Power); responding without deliberate intent is the Dao. From this imperial dominion rises and royal enterprise begins.

A human between heaven and earth is like a white colt flashing past a crack—in a moment, it is gone. Whatever surges forth vigorously is born from this; whatever quietly disperses enters through this. Already transformed, one is born; transformed again, one dies. Living creatures mourn it; people grieve. The heavenly fastening is unbound, the heavenly wrapping falls away; amid turmoil and turning, the hun and po (soul and corporeal spirit) are about to leave, and the body follows—this is the great return, the final homecoming. From no form one becomes form; from form one returns to no form—this everyone knows, yet it is not what those who are about to reach the Great Dao take as their task; it is only what the crowd talks about together. Those who truly arrive no longer discuss it; those who still discuss it have not yet arrived. Deliberately seeking and scrutinizing misses it; disputation is inferior to silence. The Dao cannot be got by hearing and inquiring—to listen and chase after it is inferior to closing the senses. This is called the great attainment.

夫老聃神人也其妙所以无方而其所以不测与孔子之言道则自精而至于粗自无而至于有故首言昭昭生于冥冥而终言形之不形夫昭昭生于冥冥者所谓天地生于混成也有天地然后有人伦有人伦然后有万物而君臣帝王之道无有不备此道之生成如此也然而道不可辩也辩之不若不辩也故曰辩不若默道不可闻也闻之不若不闻也又曰闻不若塞不辩不闻则无为而心得矣故曰此之谓大得此老聃与孔子之言道而始终之序如此也 东郭子问于庄子曰所谓道恶乎在庄子曰无所不在东郭子曰期而后可庄子曰在蝼蚁此老聃与孔子之言道而始终之序如此也
Interpretation

Laozi (Laozi, also known as La Dan) was a divine being whose marvels had no fixed abode and whose depth could not be fathomed. When he expounded the Dao to Confucius, he moved from the subtle to the manifest, from non-being to being: he began by saying that brightness (zhaozhao) arises from obscurity (mingming), and ended by speaking of form that is not form—form that does not settle into fixed shape. Brightness arising from obscurity means that Heaven and Earth arise from the undifferentiated Dao (hun cheng, the Dao before division). Once Heaven and Earth exist, human relations follow; once human relations exist, the myriad things follow; and the ways of ruler and subject, of sovereign and minister, are all thereby in place. Such is the generation of the Dao. Yet the Dao cannot be argued about—arguing is inferior to silence, hence "to argue is not as good as to be silent"; the Dao cannot be heard—hearing is inferior to not hearing, hence "to hear is not as good as to block the ears." Not arguing and not hearing, one can be without deliberate action (wuwei, non-action) yet gain something in the heart—this is called "great attainment." Laozi's discussion of the Dao with Confucius, from beginning to end, followed this order.

Dongguo Zi asked Zhuangzi: "Where is the so-called Dao?" Zhuangzi replied: "It is nowhere not present." Dongguo Zi said: "You must point to a definite place." Zhuangzi said: "It is among the ants." Laozi's discussion of the Dao with Confucious, from beginning to end, followed this order.

东郭子问于庄子曰所谓道恶乎在庄子曰无所不在东郭子曰期而后可庄子曰在蝼蚁曰何其下邪曰在稊稗曰何其愈下邪曰在瓦甓曰何其愈甚邪曰在屎溺东郭子不应庄子曰夫子之问也固不及质正获之问于监市履狶也每下愈况汝唯莫必无乎逃物至道若是大言亦然周徧咸三者异名同实其指一也尝相与游乎无何有之宫同合而论无所终穷乎尝相与无为乎澹而静乎漠而清乎调而间乎寥已吾志无往焉而不知其所至去而来不知其所止吾已往来焉而不知其所终彷徨乎冯闳大知入焉而不知其所穷物物者与物无际而物有际者所谓物际者也不际之际际之不际者也谓盈虚衰杀彼为盈虚非盈虚彼为衰杀非衰杀彼为本末非本末彼为积散非积散也妸荷甘与神农同学于老龙吉神农隐几阖户昼瞑妸荷甘日中奓户而入曰老盈虚衰杀彼为盈虚非盈虚彼为衰杀非衰杀彼为本末非本末彼为积散非积散也妸荷甘与神农同学于老龙吉神农隐几阖户昼瞑妸荷甘日中奓户而入曰老龙死矣神农隐几拥杖而起嚗然放杖而笑曰天知予僻陋慢訑故弃予而死已矣夫子无所发予之狂言而死矣夫弇缸吊闻之曰夫体道者天下之君子所系焉今于道秋毫之端万分未得处一焉而犹知藏其狂言而死又况夫体道者乎视之无形听之无声于人之论者谓之冥冥所以论道而非道也道者万物之所道也在体为体在用为用无名无迹而无乎不在故自有而观则足以知其徼自无而观则足以知其妙虚静寥远而无有终始此道之至妙之理也东郭子不知其然而问道之乌在所谓蔽于一曲也蔽于一曲则不能知道之深远故庄子答之以无所不在也
Interpretation

Dongguo Zi asked Zhuangzi, “Where exactly is this thing called the Dao?” Zhuangzi replied, “There is nowhere it is not.” Dongguo Zi said, “You have to point to a definite place.” Zhuangzi said, “It is in ants.” Dongguo Zi said, “Why something so lowly?” Zhuangzi said, “It is in wild barnyard grass.” Dongguo Zi said, “Why something even lower?” Zhuangzi said, “It is in tiles and bricks.” Dongguo Zi said, “Why something still more extreme?” Zhuangzi said, “It is in excrement and urine.” Dongguo Zi said no more.

Zhuangzi said, “Your question, sir, never hit what really matters. When Zheng Huo the market officer asked the market inspector how to tell a pig’s fatness by stepping on it, the lower on the leg one stepped, the easier it was to see fat and lean; the lower the place, the more plainly the truth showed. As long as you do not insist that the Dao must be in one place, nothing can escape being outside the Dao. The utmost Dao is like this, and great words are like this too. Zhou, bian, and xian are three different names for one and the same thing.

Why not go together to the Palace of No-Where—nothing at all—and merge our talk to see whether it has an end? Why not together do nothing, stay plain and quiet, silent and clear, harmonized and at ease? My mind is already empty and still: I go without knowing where I arrive; I come and go without knowing where I stop; I move within it without knowing where it ends. Wandering in vast openness, when great understanding enters, one still does not know its limit.

The Dao that completes the ten thousand things has no boundary with things; what has boundaries is the limit between thing and thing. That boundary which is without boundary is the unbounded within boundary. What we call full, empty, decaying, and dwindling: the Dao gives things fullness and emptiness but is not itself full or empty; gives them decline and destruction but is not itself decline or destruction; gives them root and tip but is not itself root or tip; gives them gathering and scattering but is not itself gathering or scattering.

Ehegan and Shennong studied the Dao under Laolong Ji. Shennong leaned on his armrest, shut the door, and slept through the day. At noon Ehegan pushed the door open and said, “Old Long is dead!” Shennong took his staff, rose, dropped the staff with a clack, and laughed: “Sir knew I was narrow, shallow, arrogant, and rude, so he left me and died. Alas! Sir had not yet opened me with those wild words before he was gone!”

Yan Gangdiao heard this and said, “One who grasps the Dao is what the gentlemen of the world rely on. Laolong Ji had not attained even one ten-thousandth of the tip of an autumn hair’s breadth of the Dao, yet he knew to hide his wild words and die—how much more one who truly embodies the Dao! The Dao looks as if it has no form, sounds as if it has no sound; when people speak of it they call it dark and deep—that is only talk about the Dao, not the Dao itself.”

The Dao is what the ten thousand things follow. As substance it is substance; as function it is function. It has no name and leaves no trace, yet it is nowhere absent. Viewed from “being,” one can know its outward edge; viewed from “non-being,” one can know its subtle depth. Empty, still, far-reaching, without beginning or end—this is the Dao’s finest principle. Dongguo Zi did not understand and still asked where the Dao was; he was blocked by a single partial view. Blocked by partial view, one cannot know the Dao’s depth—so Zhuangzi answered: the Dao is in all places.

于是防清问乎无穷曰子知道乎无穷曰吾不知又问乎无为无为曰吾知道曰子之知道亦有数乎曰有曰其数若何无为曰吾知道道乎无穷曰吾不知又问乎无为无为曰吾知道曰子之知道亦有数乎曰有曰其数若何无为曰吾知道之可以贵可以贱可以约可以散此吾所以知道之数也泰清以之言也问乎无始曰若是则无穷之弗知与无为之知孰是而孰非乎无始曰不知深矣知之浅矣弗知内矣知之外矣于是泰清中而叹曰弗知乃知乎知乃不知乎孰知不知之知夫道无所不在天地万物由之而后成不可以言不可以拘而已矣故圣人知之而不言得之而不拘此无穷答泰清以不知也夫不知者深知也知者得之于内也此无始所以有不知矣弗知内矣之言也然泰清以无穷真不知道也故复问于无为无为者未免于有为是以答泰清以吾知道可以贵可以贱可以约可以散也夫知之者知浅也知浅者得之于外也此无始所以有知之浅矣知之外矣之言也然无穷者无有其极也无清以吾知道可以贵可以贱可以约可以散也夫知之者知浅也知浅者得之于外也此无始所以有知之浅矣知之外矣之言也然无穷者无有其极也无始者无有其初也此二子所以能知于道矣故泰清所以遽悟而兴于叹也 无始曰道不可闻闻而非也道不可见见而非也道不可言言而非也知形形之不形乎道不当名
Interpretation

Taiqing—the embodiment of supreme clarity—asked Wuji, existence without ultimate limit: “Do you understand the Dao?” Wuji replied: “I do not understand.” He then asked Wuwei, existence that follows nature without deliberate action; Wuwei said: “I understand the Dao.” Taiqing asked: “Does the Dao you understand have a structure that can be put into words?” Wuwei said: “It does.” “What is that structure?” Wuwei said: “The Dao I understand can stand in honor or in lowliness, can gather or scatter. That is the structure by which I understand the Dao.”

Taiqing took these answers to Wushi, existence without beginning: “If so, between Wuji’s not understanding and Wuwei’s understanding, who is right and who is wrong?” Wushi said: “Not understanding is depth; taking oneself to understand is shallow. Not understanding is gained from within; taking oneself to understand is only gained from without.” Hearing this, Taiqing sighed from the heart: “Is not understanding true understanding? Is taking oneself to understand actually not understanding? Who can grasp this ‘understanding’ that is not understanding?”

The Dao is nowhere absent; heaven, earth, and the ten thousand things all depend on it to come into being. It cannot be exhausted in speech, nor confined by rules and measures. Therefore the sage, though knowing the Dao, does not speak of it rashly; though attaining it, does not cling to it. That is why Wuji answered Taiqing with “I do not understand.” What is called not understanding is in fact deep knowing; deep knowing is gained from within. Hence Wushi said that not understanding is depth and not understanding is inward.

At first Taiqing took Wuji to mean that he truly did not know, so he questioned Wuwei again. The name Wuwei still does not wholly escape youwei (deliberate action), so Wuwei answered that the Dao can be noble or base, contracted or dispersed. Such knowing is only shallow knowing; shallow knowing is gained from without. Hence Wushi also said that understanding is shallow and understanding is outward.

Wuji has no ultimate and Wushi has no beginning; it is precisely for this reason that these two can truly know the Dao, and Taiqing for that reason suddenly awakened and sighed.

Wushi also said: the Dao cannot be grasped by the ear—what is heard is not the Dao; cannot be grasped by the eye—what is seen is not the Dao; cannot be grasped by speech—what is said is not the Dao. One must understand that which gives form to the ten thousand things yet has no form of its own. The Dao ought not to be pointed to by names and appearances.

道听之不闻也故曰道不可闻视之不见也故曰不可见搏之而不得也故曰不可言可闻则非为其道也故曰闻而非也可见则亦非为道也故曰见而非也可言则又非为道也故曰言而非也也故曰不可见搏之而不得也故曰不可言可闻则非为其道也故曰闻而非也可见则亦非为道也故曰见而非也可言则又非为道也故曰言而非也夫不可闻不可见者无形之形也故曰知形形之不形乎不可言者无名之名也故曰道不当名此无始所以能明于道乎 无始曰有问道而应之者不知道也虽问道者亦未闻道道无问问无应无问问之是问穷也无应应之是无内也以无内待问穷若是者外不观乎宇宙内不知乎太初是以不过乎昆仑不游乎太虚 夫道至妙而不可问无形而不可言故曰道无问问无应既无问而强问之是所问有终始极矣故曰无问问之是问穷也既无应而强应之是所应得之于外矣故曰无应应之是无内也无内则所知不矣终极则所见不广矣如此则安能通达于无尽之外而明了于太初之初逍遥于广莫之野放纵于无何有之乡欤故曰以无内待问穷若是者外不观乎宇宙内不知乎太初是以不过乎昆仑不游乎太虚此莫之野放纵于无何有之乡欤故曰以无内待问穷若是者外不观乎宇宙内不知乎太初是以不过乎昆仑不游乎太虚此无始所以复谕泰清以道不可言也
Interpretation

Dao cannot be heard, so it is said that "the Dao cannot be heard"; it cannot be seen, so it is said that "the Dao cannot be seen"; it cannot be grasped by touch, so it is said that "the Dao cannot be spoken." What can be heard is not the Dao, so it is said that "hearing is not it"; what can be seen is not the Dao, so it is said that "seeing is not it"; what can be put into words is likewise not the Dao, so it is said that "speech is not it." What cannot be heard or seen is form without form, so one must understand: that which gives form to the myriad things has no form of its own. What cannot be spoken is name without name, so it is said that "the Dao ought not to be named." Wushi (No Beginning)—a figure in the fable whose name means "without a beginning"—understood these things and could thus penetrate the Great Dao.

Wushi said: If someone asks about the Dao and you answer, you show that you do not understand the Dao; even the one who asks has not truly heard the Dao. The Dao is inherently beyond questioning, and when questioned there is nothing to answer. To insist on asking when there is nothing to ask is to push questioning to its limit—this is called "exhausted questioning"; to insist on answering when there is nothing to answer is to gain only what is outside while the inside is empty—this is called "no within." To meet questioning pushed to the limit with an empty within—such a person cannot observe the cosmos (the four directions and the flow of past and present) outwardly, nor know Taichu (the primordial origin before the myriad things arose) inwardly; therefore they cannot pass Kunlun (the highest and farthest realm) or roam in Taixu (the boundless void).

The Dao is supremely subtle and inherently unaskable; it is also formless and inherently unspeakable, so it is said that "the Dao is not for questioning, and questioning has no response." To force a question when there is nothing to ask gives the question a terminal limit, hence "exhausted questioning"; to force an answer when there is nothing to answer yields only external things, hence "no within." With emptiness within, understanding is not deep; when questioning reaches the ultimate, what is seen is not broad. How then can one reach beyond the endless, clarify what lies before Taichu, wander freely in the vast wilderness (Guangmo zhi ye), and move at ease in the land of nothingness (Wuhe you zhi xiang)? For this reason Wushi again instructed Taiqing (a fable figure whose name suggests "great clarity"): the Dao is not something that can be conveyed in words.

光曜问乎无有曰夫子有乎其无有乎光曜不得问而孰视其状貌窅然空然终日视之而不见听之而不闻搏之而不得也光曜曰至矣其孰能至此乎予能有无矣而未能无无也及为无有矣何从至此哉大马之捶钩者年八十矣而不失豪芒大马曰子巧与有道与曰臣有守也臣之年二十而好捶钩于物无视也非钩无察也是用之者假不用者也以长得其用而况乎无不用者乎物孰不资焉 光曜者言其明智也无有者言其真空也以明智而求真空则所以止知而况乎无不用者乎物孰不资焉 光曜者言其明智也无有者言其真空也以明智而求真空则所以止知粗徼也故曰孰视其状貌然而知粗而必至于精知徼而必至于妙故光曜终日视之而不见听之而不闻搏之而不得所谓至于精妙也至于精妙则自知其学不及矣故曰予能有无矣未能无无也夫真空之妙理盖自无而得之矣非由学而后至也故曰及为无有矣何从至此哉此庄子寓言至道之妙于二子矣 冉求问于仲尼曰未有天地可知邪仲尼曰可古犹今也冉求失问而退明日复见曰昔者吾问未有天地后至也故曰及为无有矣何从至此哉此庄子寓言至道之妙于二子矣
Interpretation

Bright Radiance (Guang Yao)—clear, discerning wisdom—asked Nothing-at-All (Wu You), who stands for true emptiness: “Sir, do you exist, or do you not?” When he could get no further with the question, he studied Nothing-at-All’s form closely and found only depth, stillness, and void: all day he could not see it, could not hear it, could not grasp it. Bright Radiance said, “This is truly the utmost! Who can reach such a state? I can manage ‘having and not-having,’ but I have not yet reached ‘non-non-being’—where even ‘non-being’ is no longer held on to. Once you treat ‘non-being’ as a kind of ‘being,’ from what starting point can you arrive at this?”

In the household of the Grand Marshal there was an artisan who hammered belt hooks. At eighty he still turned out hooks that missed neither a hair’s breadth nor the finest tip. The Grand Marshal asked, “Is it skill in the hands, or is there Dao in it?” The artisan said, “I keep to something I hold fast. From twenty I loved hammering hooks; I looked at nothing else, and whatever was not a hook I did not examine. That is how useful craft is carried by not fixing the mind on other things, so it can long perform its work. How much more the Great Dao, to which nothing is useless! What thing does not rely on it?”

What Bright Radiance speaks of is discerning wisdom; what Nothing-at-All speaks of is true emptiness. Using discerning wisdom to seek true emptiness can only stop at coarse views and marginal signs—hence the text says he studied the form carefully. Yet from coarse knowing one must advance to the refined, from the margin to the subtle; therefore Bright Radiance all day saw nothing, heard nothing, touched nothing—that is arrival at subtlety. At subtlety one knows one’s learning still falls short, hence “I can manage having-and-not-having, but I have not yet reached non-non-being.” The subtle principle of true emptiness is obtained from “non-being” itself, not reached only after learning—hence “once it becomes having-and-not-having, from where can one arrive?” Zhuangzi uses these two figures to allegorize the wonder of the utmost Dao.

Ran Qiu asked Confucius, “Before Heaven and Earth existed, can one know that state?” Confucius said, “One can. Ancient and present are the same.” Ran Qiu could ask no further and withdrew. The next day he came again and said, “Yesterday I asked about what comes before Heaven and Earth and what follows after.” Hence also: “Once it becomes having-and-not-having, from where can one arrive?” Here too Zhuangzi lodges the wonder of the utmost Dao in these two interlocutors.

冉求问于仲尼曰未有天地可知邪仲尼曰可古犹今也冉求失问而退明日复见曰昔者吾问未有天地可知乎夫子曰可古犹今也昔日吾昭然今日吾昧然敢问何谓也仲尼曰昔之昭然也神者先受之今之昧然也且又为不神者求邪无古无今无始无终未有子孙而有子孙可乎冉求未对仲尼曰己矣未应矣不以生生死不以死死生死生有待邪皆有所一体有先天地生者物邪物物者非物物出不得先物也犹其有物也犹其有物也无己圣人之爱人也终无己者亦乃取于是者也 昔之昭然者与道冥会也故曰神者先受之今之昧然者求则愈惑也故曰且又为不神者求邪无古无今无始无终者道之妙体也达于道之妙体则入于不生不死之域此仲尼所以未待冉求之对而言不以生生死不以死死神者求邪无古无今无始无终者道之妙体也达于道之妙体则入于不生不死之域此仲尼所以未待冉求之对而言不以生生死不以死死生也
Interpretation

Ran Qiu asked Confucius (Zhongni): Before heaven and earth had yet to appear, could one know that state? Confucius said: One could. The ancient and the present are the same. Ran Qiu did not know what to ask next, so he withdrew. The next day he came again and said: Yesterday I asked whether one could know when heaven and earth had not yet existed, and the Master said one could—that ancient and present are the same. Yesterday I was clear about this, but today I am confused; may I ask what this means?

Confucius said: Yesterday you were clear because your spirit-mind (shen) had first received it; today you are confused because you are again trying to force understanding with an unillumined mind, are you not? There is no ancient and no present; no beginning and no end. There are not yet descendants, yet one says there already are descendants—is that possible? Ran Qiu did not answer.

Confucius said: Enough; no need to answer. Do not use birth to bring forth death from birth, and do not use death to bring death upon birth. Are death and birth mutually dependent? They belong to the same whole. Is there something that existed before heaven and earth, yet is still one thing in itself? What makes things into things is not itself a thing. When a thing appears, there cannot be something more prior than that thing; if there were, it would still be a thing. As long as there are still things, there is no end. The sage’s love for people never comes to an end—this too takes its model from here.

What once felt clear was the heart tacitly aligning with the Way (Dao); hence the saying that the spirit-mind receives first. What now feels confused is the more one seeks, the more one is lost; hence the saying that one again uses an unspiritual mind to seek. No ancient, no present, no beginning, no end—this is precisely the subtle essential body of the Way. To penetrate this essential body is to enter the state of neither birth nor death. Therefore Confucius did not wait for Ran Qiu to answer before saying: do not use birth to bring forth death from birth, and do not use death to bring death upon birth.

颜渊问乎仲尼曰回尝闻诸夫子曰无有所将无有所迎回敢问其游仲尼曰古之人外化而内不化今之人内化而外不化与物化者一不化者也安化安不化安与之相靡必与之莫多狶韦氏之囿黄帝之圃有虞氏之宫汤武之室君子之人若儒墨者师故以是非相也而况今之人乎圣人处物不伤物不伤物者物亦不能伤也唯无所伤者为能与人相将迎山林与皋壤与使我欣欣然而乐与乐未毕也哀又继之哀乐之来吾不能御其去弗能止悲夫世人直为物逆旅耳夫知遇而不知所不遇知能能而不能所不能无知无能者固人之所不免也夫务免乎人之所不免者岂不亦悲哉外来吾不能御其去弗能止悲夫世人直为物逆旅耳夫知遇而不知所不遇知能能而不能所不能无知无能者固人之所不免也夫务免乎人之所不免者岂不亦悲哉外化而内不化者心得于道而体自冥合也内化而外不化者心务求道而体不顺也与物化者一不化者盖能与物齐同而抱一不变也安化安不化者任其自化而无使化也安与之相靡者无心与物而不与之靡刃也必与之莫多者赡足衣被而不为有余也狶韦氏之囿黄帝之圃有虞氏之宫汤武之室者此言道为圣人之域而无心足以游处也 至言去言至为去为齐知之所知则浅矣 至言者不言也故曰至言去言至为者无为也故曰至为去为二者非入于至道则安能去言去为矣是以言之于终篇
Interpretation

Yan Hui (Yan Hui, a disciple of Confucius) asked Zhongni (Confucius): “I have heard the Master say, ‘Do not deliberately go forth, and do not deliberately welcome in.’ How can one wander so freely?” Confucius said: “The ancients changed outwardly with things while their inner mind did not change; people today let the inner mind shift with change while outwardly they become stiff and unyielding. The one who can change together with the myriad things is precisely the one whose inner mind stays unchanged. Be at ease with change and at ease with unchanging; be calmly worn and polished together with things, yet never add anything extra on one’s own. The park of Xihu Shi (a legendary ancient ruler), the garden of the Yellow Emperor, the palace of Youyu Shi (Yu Shun), the halls of Tang and Wu (King Tang of Shang and King Wu of Zhou)—all were like this. As for gentlemen, even teachers of Ru and Mo (Confucianism and Mohism) still grind one another with right and wrong—how much more so people today! The sage dwells among the myriad things without harming them; one who does not harm things finds that things cannot harm him either. Only one who harms nothing can naturally send off and welcome others in life.”

Outward transformation with inward non-transformation means the heart has already attained the Dao (the Way), and the bodily form naturally merges with it in silent union. Inward transformation with outward non-transformation means the heart is impatient to reach the Dao while the bodily form does not follow along. To change with things yet hold to one thing that does not change is to be able to equalize with the myriad things while guarding the “One” (the unchanging true self). Being at ease with transformation and with non-transformation is to let things transform on their own and not to drive them to transform. Being calmly worn and polished with things is to have no deliberate mind toward things—not to grind against outer things like blade against blade. “Definitely not adding more” means that clothing and daily needs are already sufficient, yet one does not think oneself has a surplus. The mention of the park of Xihu Shi, the garden of the Yellow Emperor, the palace of Youyu Shi, and the halls of Tang and Wu is to say that the great Dao is the realm where sages roam; being without deliberate mind is enough to rest and wander within it.

The highest speech is speech that dispenses with speech; the highest action is action that dispenses with action. To stop only at what the mind knows and can label is shallow. The utmost speech is really not speaking, which is why it is said that utmost speech must drop speech; the utmost action is really Wuwei (non-action), which is why it is said that utmost action must drop action. In these two matters, unless one has already entered the ultimate Dao, how could one drop speech and action? That is why this is said at the close of the chapter.

南华真经去言至为者无为也故曰至为去为二者非入于至道则安能去言去为矣是以言之于终篇 南华真经新传卷十 钦定四库全书 南华真经新传卷十一 宋 王雱 撰 庚桑楚篇 夫能达于至道之妙者则处无为任自然不期于化而物自化此庚桑子之能若是矣庄子因而作庚桑楚篇 老聃之役有庚桑楚者偏得老聃之道以北居畏垒之山其臣之画然知者去之其妾之絜然仁者远之拥肿之与居鞅掌之为使居三年畏垒大穰畏垒之民相与言曰庚桑子之始来吾洒然异之今吾日计之而不足岁计之而有余庶几其圣人乎子胡不相与尸而祝之社而稷之乎庚桑子闻之南面而不释然 夫老子之道以真空为体以妙然异之今吾日计之而不足岁计之而有余庶几其圣人乎子胡不相与尸而祝之社而稷之乎庚桑子闻之南面而不释然 夫老子之道以真空为体以妙有为用非至人孰能心得之庚桑子可谓至人而能达真空妙有之趣也故曰偏得老聃之道夫得于真空则至虚也达于妙有则至静也虚静无为则与天地同其流阴阳同其和不迕于物而所居皆化此畏垒所以大穰也然而至人非求异于人而人所以自异之此畏垒之民所谓自异于庚桑子也为而不恃功成不居见宠而惊闻誉而惧此畏垒之民以丰穰由庚桑子之所致欲以尸祝社稷而尊事之楚所以闻而不怿也
Interpretation

The Nanhua Zhenjing (i.e., the Zhuangzi) speaks of setting aside words and reaching the highest conduct: the highest conduct is to act without acting (wuwei), hence it is called “ultimate conduct”; at the same time one must also set aside deliberate, contrived action. These two things—who could accomplish them without already having entered the Way to the utmost? Hence they are explained again at the very end of the work.

Nanhua Zhenjing Xinzhuan, juan 10. The Siku Quanshu edition includes Nanhua Zhenjing Xinzhuan, juan 11, by Wang Peng of the Song.

Chapter: Gengsang Chu

Those who can penetrate the subtlety of the utmost Dao rest in non-action (wuwei), trust what is natural, and do not deliberately set out to teach—yet the ten thousand things transform on their own. Gengsangzi could do this; Zhuangzi therefore wrote the “Gengsang Chu” chapter.

Among Laozi’s disciples was one named Gengsang Chu, who alone received Laozi’s Dao. He went north and lived on Mount Weilei. He sent away household officers who showed off cleverness, kept at a distance concubines who made a display of purity and benevolence, lived only with those whose looks were clumsy and plain, and used for errands people who toiled and ran about. After three years, Weilei had a great harvest. The local people said to one another: “When Gengsangzi first came, we suddenly felt he was not like others; now, counted by days you see nothing special, counted by years there is more than enough—surely he is a sage? Why don’t we all take him as a spirit lord to sacrifice to, and set up a sheji (altars to the gods of soil and grain) to honor him?” When Gengsangzi heard this, he turned to face south and was not at ease in his heart.

Laozi’s Dao takes empty fullness (vacuum) as its substance and marvelous being (miaoyou) as its function; who but a perfected person (zhiren) could truly grasp it in the heart? Gengsangzi may be called a perfected person: he could penetrate the purport of empty fullness and marvelous being. Hence it is said he alone received Laodan’s Dao. To obtain empty fullness is to be utterly empty; to penetrate marvelous being is to be utterly still. Empty, still, and without acting—then one moves with heaven and earth and harmonizes with yin and yang, never clashing with the ten thousand things; wherever one dwells, transformation and nurturing follow. That is why Weilei had a great harvest. Yet the perfected person does not mean to differ from others—it is people who feel he is different; that is what the people of Weilei meant by saying Gengsangzi was unlike them. He acted yet did not rely on himself; when the work was done he did not claim credit. When he saw others honor him he was startled; when he heard people praise him he was anxious. The people attributed the harvest to Gengsangzi and wanted to sacrifice to him and set up sheji to honor him—so when Gengsang Chu heard it, he was displeased at heart.

成不居见宠而惊闻誉而惧此畏垒之民以丰穰由庚桑子之所致欲以尸祝社稷而尊事之楚所以闻而不怿也 弟子异之庚桑子曰弟子何异于予夫春气发而百草生正得秋而万宝成夫春与秋岂无得而然哉大道已行矣吾闻至人尸居环堵之室而百姓猖狂不知所如往今以畏垒之细民而窃窃焉欲俎豆予于贤人之间我其杓之人邪吾是以不释于老聃之言 夫至人藏天真忘天机黜聪明弃智虑魄然忘其所为而任自然故曰尸居环堵之室也然而至人所居如此也不与物接而物亦不知其所然也故曰百姓狂猖不知所如往 弟子曰不然夫寻常之沟巨鱼无所还其体而鲵防为之制步仞之丘陵巨兽无所隐其躯而防狐为之祥且夫尊贤授能先善与利自古尧不知所如往
Interpretation

Though Gengsang Chu had achieved something, he did not claim it for himself; when he received favor he was alarmed, and when he heard praise he was afraid. The people of Weilei (a mountain region) believed their good harvest was due to Gengsangzi (a disciple of Laozi) and wanted to honor him as their she and ji (patrons of soil and grain) with full sacrificial rites—so when he heard of it he was displeased.

His disciples found this strange. Gengsangzi said: Why find it strange? When spring qi stirs, the hundred grasses grow; when autumn comes, every kind of fruit ripens. Do spring and autumn gain something extra to make this happen? It is simply that the Dao is already at work. I have heard that the perfected person sits still as a corpse in a cramped hut with walls on every side, while the common people rush about wildly and do not know where they are going. Now the folk of little Weilei privately wish to set me among the worthies with sacrificial vessels and offerings—must I become someone others take as a measuring ladle and standard? That is why I cannot be at ease with what Old Laozi said.

The perfected person hides his heaven-given genuineness and forgets the heaven-endowed mechanism; he dismisses cleverness and casts off cunning calculation, blankly forgetting his own doing and leaving things to nature—hence the saying that he “dwells like a corpse in a small room.” He does not touch outer things, and outer things do not know why he is thus—hence the saying that the people run wild and know not whither they go.

The disciple said: Not so. In an ordinary ditch, a great fish cannot turn its body, yet the minnow and the mudfish can lord it there; on a hill a few feet high, a large beast cannot hide, yet the wildcat and fox take it for an auspicious place. Honoring the worthy, appointing the capable, putting the good first and benefiting all—since the time of Yao no one has known where that path leads.

弟子曰不然夫寻常之沟巨鱼无所还其体而鲵防为之制步仞之丘陵巨兽无所隐其躯而防狐为之祥且夫尊贤授能先善与利自古尧舜以然而况畏垒之民乎夫子亦听矣庚桑子曰小子来夫函车之兽介而离山则不免于罔罟之患吞舟之鱼砀而失水则蚁能苦之故鸟兽不厌高鱼鳖不厌夫全其形生之人藏其身也不厌眇而已矣且夫二子者又何足以称扬哉是其于辩也将妄凿垣墙而植蓬蒿也简发而栉数米而炊窃乎又何足以济世哉举贤则民相轧任知则民相盗之数物者不足以其于辩也将妄凿垣墙而植蓬蒿也简发而栉数米而炊窃乎又何足以济世哉举贤则民相轧任知则民相盗之数物者不足以厚民民之于利甚勤子有杀父臣有杀君正昼为盗日中穴阫吾语汝大乱之本必生于尧舜之间其末存乎千世之后千世之后其必有人与人相食者也 鱼阴也兽阳物也阴隐而阳显此物理之自然也庚桑子之弟子言巨鱼巨兽而告庚桑子所以明其隐显之理也然隐者自隐显者自显各守其极则不致于累傥隐过其极则为所制显过其极则为隐所拘此亦势之自然也故庚桑子所以答以兽离山而罔罟制鱼失水而蝼蚁苦以其失隐显之异也岂若各守其极而退藏于眇乎以此见至人能冥其极而所以全身也
Interpretation

The disciple said: It is not so. In a ditch no wider than usual, a great fish cannot even turn around, yet minnows and loach can have it all to themselves; on a mound no higher than a few paces, a huge beast cannot hide, yet a lone fox takes it as an auspicious dwelling. Moreover, honoring the worthy and employing the capable, putting good conduct and benefit first—this has been so since the ancient sages Yao and Shun, so why should the people of Ailei (the mountain where Gengsangzi lived in seclusion) be any different? You, Master, ought to follow this approach as well.

Gengsangzi said: Young man, come closer. A beast whose mouth can hold a whole cart, once it leaves the forest alone, cannot escape the net; a fish that can swallow a boat, once washed from the water and deprived of it, is harassed even by ants. Therefore birds and beasts do not disdain high mountains, and fish and turtles do not disdain deep water. Those who wish to preserve body and life need only hide without disdaining what is deep and obscure. What is there to praise in those two, Yao and Shun? To take them as the standard for judging right and wrong is like recklessly breaking through a wall to plant wormwood, or combing the hair strand by strand and cooking rice grain by grain—petty, furtive fussing that cannot save the world. When the worthy are promoted, the people vie with one another; when cleverness is employed, the people steal from one another. Such measures cannot make the people simple and sincere. When the people pursue profit too urgently, sons kill fathers and ministers kill lords; theft happens in broad daylight and walls are dug through at noon. I tell you: the root of great disorder must arise in the time of Yao and Shun, and its harm will linger for a thousand generations; after a thousand generations, people eating one another will surely occur.

Fish belong to yin and beasts to yang. Yin governs concealment and yang governs manifestation—this is the natural order of things. The disciple cited the great fish and great beast to explain the principle of hiding and showing to Gengsangzi. Yet what should be hidden naturally hides, and what should be shown naturally shows; each keeps to its own measure and then avoids being dragged into trouble. If concealment exceeds its measure, it is constrained by what is manifest; if manifestation exceeds its measure, it is bound by what is hidden—this too is the necessity of circumstance. Thus Gengsangzi replied: when the beast leaves the mountain it is caught by nets; when the fish loses water it is tormented by ants—because they have lost the proper distinction between hiding and showing. How can that compare with each keeping to its measure and withdrawing into depth and obscurity? From this it is clear that the consummate person (one of highest cultivation) can merge in silence with the measure of their own lot, and thereby preserve themselves.

南荣趎蹴然正坐曰若趎之年者而罔罟制鱼失水而蝼蚁苦以其失隐显之异也岂若各守其极而退藏于眇乎以此见至人能冥其极而所以全身也 南荣趎蹴然正坐曰若趎之年者已长矣将恶乎托业以及此言耶庚桑子曰全汝形抱汝生无使汝思虑营营若此参年则可以及此言也南荣趎曰目之与形吾不知其异也而盲者不能自见耳之与形吾不知其异也而聋者不能自闻心之与形吾不知其异也而狂者不能自得形之与形亦辟矣而物或间之邪欲相求而不能相得今谓趎曰全汝形抱汝生勿使汝思虑营营趎勉闻道达耳矣庚桑子曰辞尽矣曰奔不能化藿蠋越鸡不能伏鹄卵鲁鸡固能矣鸡之与鸡其德非不同也有能与不能者其才固有巨小也今吾才奔不能化藿蠋越鸡不能伏鹄卵鲁鸡固能矣鸡之与鸡其德非不同也有能与不能者其才固有巨小也今吾才小不足以化子子胡不南见老子南荣趎赢粮七日七夜至老子之所老子曰子自楚之所来乎南荣趎曰唯老子曰子何与人偕来之众也南荣趎瞿然顾其后老子曰子不知吾所谓乎南荣趎俯而惭仰而叹曰今者吾忘吾答因失吾问老子曰何谓也南荣趎曰不知乎人谓我朱愚知乎反愁我躯不仁则害人仁则反愁我身不义则伤彼义则反愁我已我安逃此而可此三言者趎之所患也愿因楚而问之老子不仁则害人仁则反愁我身不义则伤彼义则反愁我已我安逃此而可此三言者趎之所患也愿因楚而问之老子曰向吾见若眉睫之间吾因以得汝矣今汝又言而信之若规规然若丧父母揭竿而求诸海也汝亡人哉惘惘乎汝欲反汝情性而无由入可怜哉南荣趎请入就舍召其所好去其所恶十日自愁复见老子老子曰汝自洒濯孰哉郁郁乎然而其中津津乎犹有恶也
Interpretation

Nanrong Chu, a disciple of Gengsang Chu, sat up straight with solemn composure. Here fish serve as a comparison: when fish are trapped by nets and snares and once they leave the water, they are tormented by ants and mole crickets—because they have lost the proper measure of when to hide and when to show themselves. How much better to each guard their own utmost limit and withdraw into what is deep and subtle? From this one can see that a realized person—one who has attained the Dao—can hide their sharp edge to the utmost and thereby preserve themselves.

Nanrong Chu sat upright again and said, “At my age I am already old. On what learning and calling should I rely to reach the state you describe?” Gengsang Chu said, “Preserve your bodily form, hold fast to your vital life, and do not let your thoughts and worries bustle without rest. After three years of this, one can begin to speak of this level.” Nanrong Chu said, “As for the eyes in relation to the body, I see no difference—yet the blind cannot see for themselves; as for the ears in relation to the body, I likewise see no difference—yet the deaf cannot hear for themselves; as for the heart-mind in relation to the body, again I see no difference—yet one whose heart-mind is unsettled cannot find peace for themselves. Body and body are inherently connected—is something blocked by external things, so that they wish to connect but cannot? Now you say ‘preserve the whole form, embrace life, do not let thought be busy’—I strain to listen to the Way, yet it barely passes my ears.” Gengsang Chu said, “I have said all I can. The small bee cannot transform the large green caterpillar on bean leaves; the Yue chicken cannot hatch a swan’s egg, but the Lu chicken can. One chicken and another are not different in nature—whether they can or cannot depends on native endowment being large or small. My endowment is small; it is not enough to guide you. Why not go south and visit Laozi?”

Nanrong Chu took provisions and walked seven days and seven nights until he reached Laozi. Laozi asked, “You come from Gengsang Chu?” Nanrong Chu said, “Yes.” Laozi said, “Why have you brought so many people with you?” Nanrong Chu looked back in astonishment. Laozi said, “Do you not grasp my meaning?” Nanrong Chu bowed his head in shame, then sighed toward heaven: “I have forgotten how to answer, and what I came to ask has slipped away.” Laozi asked, “What do you mean?” Nanrong Chu said, “If I am ignorant, people call me dull and stupid; if I am knowledgeable, I am instead tormented about this body of mine. Being unkind harms others, yet practicing kindness torments my own person; being unjust injures people, yet practicing justice torments myself. Where can I flee? These three things are my afflictions. I wished to borrow Gengsang Chu’s introduction to seek instruction from you.” Laozi said, “Just now, from the space between your brows, I already knew; now that you speak again, it is confirmed. You are so cramped and uneasy, as if your parents had died, as if you were holding a pole and going out to sea to search. You are one who has lost your true nature—dazed and confused! You wish to return to your original nature yet cannot find the entrance. Pitiful!”

Nanrong Chu asked to stay. He called back what he had liked and cast off what he had disliked; alone he brooded for ten days, then saw Laozi again. Laozi said, “You have washed yourself quite thoroughly on the outside, and your bearing looks composed; yet within, the dregs still seep through—evil not yet fully removed.”

全汝形者所谓不亏其形也抱汝生者所谓善摄生者也无使汝思虑营营者所谓无心于物也三者非至人不能具之矣 夫外韄者不可防而捉将内揵内韄者不可缪而捉将外揵外内韄者道德不能持而况放道而行者乎南荣趎曰里人有病里人问之病者能言其病然其病病者犹未病也若趎之闻大道譬如饮药以加病也 夫耳目外也心智内也耳目南荣趎曰里人有病里人问之病者能言其病然其病病者犹未病也若趎之闻大道譬如饮药以加病也 夫耳目外也心智内也耳目用于外则心智荡于内心智荡于内则耳目用于外用于外者虽为有得而心智从而难制也故曰外韄者不可防而捉将内揵荡于内者亦为有得而耳目从而难闭也故曰内韄者不可缪而捉将外揵内外惑于所得而不能制其于道德难存矣故曰外内韄者道德不能持此皆有我之累也惟至人无我而外遗于耳目内忘于心智入于真空自得之域而自古以固存此老子谕南荣趎以至人之道也
Interpretation

“Preserve your form” means not harming or depleting your body; “embrace your life” means knowing how to nurture life well; “do not let anxious thoughts churn without rest” means the heart does not cling to external things. These three qualities cannot all be possessed together except by the supreme person (one whose cultivation has reached the utmost).

When outward constraints cannot be blocked and seized from the outside, one must turn inward to gather and close oneself off. When inward constraints cannot be grasped and held by entanglement within, one must turn outward to release and loosen. When bound both inside and out, even Virtue (De) cannot be maintained—how much less can those who wish to let themselves go freely and act in accord with the Way (Dao)?

Nanrong Chu (a disciple of Gengsang Chu) said: When someone in the village falls ill and neighbors come to inquire, the sick person can describe their ailment; yet someone who can treat illness as illness is not deeply ill after all. I have heard the Great Dao, and it is as if I drank medicine and my condition grew worse.

The ears and eyes belong to the outer realm; the mind and its schemes belong to the inner. When the ears and eyes are driven outward, the mind churns within; when the mind churns within, the ears and eyes are used even more on the outside. Those who exert themselves outwardly may seem to gain something, yet the mind follows and becomes hard to restrain—hence it is said: outward binding cannot rely on blocking and seizing; one must turn inward to gather. Those who churn inwardly likewise seem to gain something, yet the ears and eyes follow and become hard to shut—hence it is said: inward binding cannot rely on entangling and grasping; one must turn outward to release. When inner and outer alike are confused by what they seem to gain and cannot govern themselves, Virtue (De) is hard to keep—hence it is said: when bound inside and out, Virtue (De) cannot be upheld either. All of this is the burden of “having a self.” Only the supreme person is without self: outwardly they set aside the chase of ears and eyes; inwardly they forget the reckoning of mind and cunning; they enter the state of empty void and self-attainment (stillness without clinging, resting in one’s own natural ease)—a state that from ancient times has always been inherently there. This is the way of the supreme person that Laozi expounded to Nanrong Chu.

Nanrong Chu said: I only wish to hear the essential teaching on nurturing life (weisheng zhi jing). Laozi said: The essential teaching on nurturing life lies in being able to hold fast and guard unity, to cast off the ears and eyes, inwardly to forget mind and cunning, and to enter that state of empty void and self-attainment that from ancient times has been inherently there. This is the way of the supreme person that Laozi made clear to Nanrong Chu.

趎愿闻卫生之经而已矣老子曰卫生之经能抱遗于耳目内忘于心智入于真空自得之域而自古以固存此老子谕南荣趎以至人之道也 趎愿闻卫生之经而已矣老子曰卫生之经能抱一乎能勿失乎能无卜筮而知吉凶乎能止乎能已乎能诸人而求诸已乎能翛然乎能侗然乎能儿子乎儿子终日嗥而嗌不嗄和之至也终日握而手不掜共其德也终日视而目不瞬偏不在外也行不知所之居不知所为与物委蛇而同其波是卫生之经已南荣趎曰然则是至人之德已乎曰非也是乃所谓氷解冻释者卫生者卫全其生也能卫全其生则生所以常存故曰卫生之经也夫全生之道必先无摇汝精也故曰能抱一乎无摇其精则自得也故曰能勿失乎自得则能明祸福也故曰能无卜筮而知吉凶乎明于祸福则不也夫全生之道必先无摇汝精也故曰能抱一乎无摇其精则自得也故曰能勿失乎自得则能明祸福也故曰能无卜筮而知吉凶乎明于祸福则不役于物也故曰能止乎不役于物则了达也故曰能己乎了达则忘彼而全形也故曰能舍诸人而求己乎形全则死生聚散不能为累于胸中所以归于婴儿也故曰能翛然乎能侗然乎能婴儿乎归于婴儿则声虽发而专气致柔也故曰儿子终日嗥而嗌不嗄和之至也手虽握而非为有得也故曰终日握而手不掜共其德也目虽视而非用其明故曰终日视而目不瞬偏不在外也足虽行而非有握而非为有得也故曰终日握而手不掜共其德也目虽视而非用其明故曰终日视而目不瞬偏不在外也足虽行而非有所遂也故曰行不知所之身虽止而非有所作也故曰居不知所为与物齐谐而同其流此所谓全生之道也故曰与物委蛇而同其波是卫生之经也
Interpretation

Nangong Kui said he only wished to hear the constant method of nurturing life. Laozi said: In the constant method of nurturing life, can you hold to unity? Can you keep from losing it? Can you know fortune and misfortune without divination? Can you stop? Can you let go? Can you cease seeking from others and turn to seek within yourself? Can you be free and unconstrained? Can you be plain and unassuming? Can you be like an infant? An infant cries all day yet its throat does not grow hoarse—this is harmony at its utmost. It holds its little fists all day yet its hands do not stiffen and clench—this is being in accord with innate De (Virtue/Power). It looks all day yet its eyes do not blink without cease, because its mind does not fix on outer things. It walks without knowing where it is going; it stays without knowing what it is doing—it follows the winding changes of the ten thousand things and rises and falls with them. This is the constant method of nurturing life.

Nangong Kui asked: Then is this the De of the perfected person (one who has cultivated to the utmost)? The reply was: No. This is only what is called ice melting and thaw dissolving—the stagnation has just begun to loosen.

“Weisheng” (nurturing life) means guarding and preserving one’s own life. Only when life is guarded and preserved can it endure and remain constant; hence it is called the scripture of nurturing life. The principle of preserving life is, first of all, not to disturb your Jing (essence, the root of life). Hence the question “Can you hold to the One?” When Jing is not disturbed, you gain something of your own; hence “Can you keep from losing it?” When you have gained, you can clearly distinguish fortune and misfortune; hence “Can you know fortune and misfortune without divination?” When fortune and misfortune are clear, you are not enslaved by outer things; hence “Can you stop?” When you are not enslaved by outer things, the mind becomes unobstructed; hence “Can you let go?” Once unobstructed, you forget others outside and preserve yourself; hence “Can you cease seeking from people and seek within yourself?” When the body is preserved, birth, death, gathering, and scattering cannot burden the breast; then you return to the state of an infant—hence “Can you be free? Can you be plain? Can you be like an infant?”

Returning to the infant: though the voice sounds, it is from concentrating Qi until it is soft; so the infant cries all day without hoarseness—this is the extreme of harmony. Though the hand grasps, it is not to seize anything; so it holds all day without stiffness—this is sharing in its De. Though the eyes see, they do not deploy clever contrivance; so it looks all day without the eyes ceasing to rest—the mind does not lean outward. Though the feet walk, there is no goal that must be reached; so it walks without knowing whither. Though the body stays, there is nothing deliberately to be done; so it dwells without knowing what it is for. Harmonizing with the ten thousand things and flowing with the same current—this is the way of preserving life; therefore following the ten thousand things and sharing their wave is the scripture of nurturing life.

夫至人者相与交食乎地而交乐乎天不以人物利害相撄不相与为怪不相与为谋不相与为事翛然而往侗然而来是谓卫生之经已曰然则是至乎曰未也吾固告汝曰能儿子乎儿子动不知所为行不知所之身若槁木之枝而心若死灰若是者祸亦不至福亦不来祸福无有恶有人灾也 夫至人者与物为一而不异于人食其所食而乐其所乐虚心善应而事莫能累无意于物而怪何能动何人灾也 夫至人者与物为一而不异于人食其所食而乐其所乐虚心善应而事莫能累无意于物而怪何能动何思何虑而岂有其谋无心无为而非有于事往来无碍而自在圆通此至人全生常存之道也故曰是卫生之经也 宇泰定者发乎天光发乎天光者人见其人人有修者乃今有恒有恒者人舍之天助之人之所舍谓之天民天之所助谓之天子 夫至人复归于婴儿则精全而神王也志广而气充也精全神王则与天为一志广气充则其明自照故曰宇泰定者发乎天光宇者精神志气之所宅也至人之精神志气岂有移易乎故曰泰定也以其泰定则自然明照所以谓之天光也 学者学其所不能学也行者行其所不能行也辩者辩其所不能辩也知止乎其所不能知至矣若有不即是者天钧败之备物以将形藏谓之天光也
Interpretation

The Perfect Person eats on the same earth as everyone else and shares the same joy as Heaven, yet is not disturbed by the gains and losses of people and things, and does not join others in scheming, plotting, or taking action. They depart without constraint and arrive in pristine simplicity. This is the constant method of nurturing life. Someone asked: Is this the ultimate? The answer: Not yet. I have told you: Can you be like an infant? When an infant moves, it does not know what it is doing; when it walks, it does not know where it is going. Its body is like a withered branch; its mind is like dead ashes. For such a person, misfortune will not come, nor will good fortune. When neither misfortune nor fortune exist, how could there be human-made calamity?

The Perfect Person is one with the myriad things, yet no different from ordinary people. They eat what they eat and delight in what they delight in. The mind is empty and still, yet adept at responding; affairs cannot entangle them. They have no intention toward things—how could the strange and uncanny move them? How could there be human-made calamity?

The Perfect Person is one with the myriad things, not different from ordinary people, eating what they eat, delighting in what they delight in. Empty-minded yet skillfully responsive, affairs cannot drag them down; toward things they have no deliberate intent, so the strange cannot shake them. Without deliberation, how could there be further scheming? Without mind and without deliberate action, they do not treat affairs as things that must be done. Coming and going without obstruction, free and unobstructed—this is the Perfect Person’s way of preserving life and enduring. Hence it is called the constant method of nurturing life.

When the heart’s dwelling is peaceful and settled, Heavenly Light (natural radiance) shines forth. One who emits Heavenly Light—only then do people recognize them for who they are. When a person has cultivation, only then do they have constancy. One who has constancy—people rely on them, and Heaven assists them. Those whom people rely on are called people of Heaven; those whom Heaven assists are called Sons of Heaven.

The Perfect Person returns to the state of an infant: essence (Jing) is complete, spirit (Shen) is vigorous, the will is broad, and breath (Qi) is full. When essence is complete and spirit vigorous, one is one with Heaven; when the will is broad and breath full, radiance illumines of itself. Hence it is said: one whose heart-dwelling is peaceful and settled emits Heavenly Light. Yu (the cosmos) is where spirit and will reside. How could the Perfect Person’s spirit and will be changeable and unsettled? Therefore it is called supreme stillness (taiding). Because of supreme stillness, there is natural clear illumination—hence it is called Heavenly Light.

The learner learns what cannot be learned; the actor does what cannot be done; the debater argues what cannot be argued. To know and stop at what one cannot know—this is the ultimate. If someone does not comply with this, the Heavenly Scale (tiānjūn, the naturally balanced force of the Dao) will defeat them. Preparing external things to support the form, storing and holding within—this is called Heavenly Light.

学者学其所不能学也行者行其所不能行也辩者辩其所不能辩也知止乎其所不能知至矣若有不即是者天钧败之备物以将形藏不虞以生心敬中以达彼若是而万恶至者皆天也而非人也不足以滑成不可内于灵台灵台者有持而不知其所持而不可持者也不见其诚已而发每发而不当业入而不舍每更为失为不善乎显明之中者人得而诛之为不善乎幽闲之中者得而诛之明乎人明乎者然后能独行劵内者行乎无名劵外者志乎期费行乎无名者唯庸有光志乎期费者唯贾人也人见其跂犹之魁然 全生之道学者不能学之也行者不能行之也辩者不能辩之也智者不能知之也惟绝学忘行去辩丧智任于自然则得之也故曰学者学其所不能学也行者行其所不能行也辩者辩之也辩者不能辩之也智者不能知之也惟绝学忘行去辩丧智任于自然则得之也故曰学者学其所不能学也行者行其所不能行也辩者辩其所不能辩也知止乎所不能知至矣不能如此而强欲求为之则不惟伤生而自然之性命亦丧矣故曰若有不即是者天钧败之
Interpretation

Those who learn learn what they were never able to learn; those who act do what they were never able to do; those who debate argue what they were never able to argue. To know when to stop at what cannot be known is the utmost. If one does not act in this way, the natural balance of heaven (tianjun—the turning of creation in even, spontaneous motion) will ruin him.

The way to preserve life in full cannot be learned by learners, carried out by doers, clarified by debaters, or grasped by the clever through cunning. Only by abandoning learning, forgetting deliberate action, dropping disputation, and laying aside cleverness, and letting everything follow nature, can it be attained. Those who cannot do this yet force themselves to pursue and to act not only harm life but also lose the nature and mandate they received at birth.

Stocking things to nourish the body, hiding away in what cannot be foreseen, keeping the heart alive, and reverently guarding the inner self so as to reach outward things—even so, all kinds of misfortune still arrive. They come from heaven, not from people; they are not enough to disturb virtue already achieved, and they should not be shut into the spirit platform (lingtai—the seat of mind and spirit). The spirit platform seems to hold something, yet one does not know what it holds; what can truly be kept cannot be clung to on purpose.

To move outward before making the inner self sincere: every move is wrong. When outer affairs invade the heart and one refuses to let go, each shift becomes a fault. Doing wrong in the open, people can punish; doing wrong in hidden, dark places, ghosts can punish. Only when one understands both human punishment and ghostly punishment can one walk alone.

Those on the inner tally (quan neizhe—those who keep to inner duty) act without seeking a name; those on the outer tally (quan waizhe—those who chase outer things) set their will on the fame and gain they hope for. Those who act without seeking a name find their own light in plainness; those whose aim is fame and profit are no more than merchants. Others see them straining on tiptoe and still think them grand and extraordinary.

与物穷者物入焉与物且者其身之不能容焉能容人不能容人者无亲无亲者尽人兵莫于志镆铘为下寇莫大于阴阳无所逃于天地之间非阴阳贼之心则使之也道通其分也其成也毁也所恶乎分者其分也以备所以恶乎备者其有以备故出而不反见其出而得是谓得死灭而有实之一也以有形者象无形者而定矣
Interpretation

Those who can be with all things from beginning to end find that the outer world naturally returns to them. Those who compromise with things or turn against them cannot even tolerate themselves—how could they tolerate others? Without tolerance there is no closeness; without closeness one is abandoned by everyone. There is no weapon more vicious than the heart-mind; the famed blade Mo Ye ranks second. There is no calamity greater than Yin-Yang—nowhere under heaven can one escape it. Yet it is not Yin-Yang that harms people; it is the heart that commands. The Dao runs through distinction; to complete is also to destroy. Distinction is wearisome because it serves completeness; completeness is wearisome because the heart already seeks. When spirit goes outward and does not return, a ghostly aspect appears and spirit scatters and dies. Going outward and “gaining” something is gaining death. When true nature is extinguished yet one still clings to what seems real, that too is a kind of ghost. Only by letting the formed follow the formless can one be settled. To preserve wholeness in life one must first empty the heart; an empty heart can hold the ten thousand things. When the heart makes distinctions, it seeks completeness; with completeness, spirit goes out and does not return—one sees ghosts and meets death. Only when form relies on the formless does one become stable.

夫全生之道必先虚心心虚则足以有容矣有分者其分也以备所以恶乎备者其有以备故出而不反见其出而得是谓得死灭而有实之一也以有形者象无形者而定矣 夫全生之道必先虚心心虚则足以有容矣有容则物来而不拒不虚则不能容于物不能容于物则不能容于身不能容于身岂足以容他人乎故曰与物且者其身之不能容焉能容人夫不能容人则分彼我也彼我分则人防而不依而人自为人尔故曰不能容人者无亲无亲者尽人此不能内虚其心也故心既不虚则志帅妄行而戕害其性命所以愈于利器矣故曰兵莫于志镆铘为下志帅妄行而气亦从而乱则喜出于喜而毗阳怒出于怒而毗阴其为贼害尤甚矣安足以其性命所以愈于利器矣故曰兵莫于志镆铘为下志帅妄行而气亦从而乱则喜出于喜而毗阳怒出于怒而毗阴其为贼害尤甚矣安足以逃于形器之外乎故曰寇莫大于阴阳无所逃于天地之间然贼害其性命之甚者非为阴阳之所致由心不虚而喜怒妄出也故曰非阴阳贼之心则使之也
Interpretation

The way to preserve life must begin by making the inner heart-mind (xin) empty and still. Once the heart-mind is empty and still, there is room to accommodate; when it can accommodate, things that arrive are not rejected. If the heart-mind is not empty, it cannot accommodate external things; unable to accommodate external things, it cannot settle itself; when the self cannot even be settled, how can it accommodate others?

Therefore one who is obstructed by things and incompatible with them cannot even contain their own body—how could they contain others? Unable to contain others, “that” and “this” are split apart. Once self and other are divided, others guard against you and will not draw close or rely on you; people can only keep their distance from one another. Thus one who cannot contain others has no one close; with no one close, one is cut off from everyone. All of this is because one fails to make the inner heart-mind empty and still.

When the heart-mind is not empty, the governing intention of the heart-mind (zhi—the aim that directs words and deeds) runs wild and injures life; the harm exceeds that of sharp weapons. Therefore no weapon is more ruinous than a wild heart-mind; famous blades such as Mo and Ye come only after that. When intention runs wild, Qi follows into disorder: joy piled on joy injures Yang (piyang); anger piled on anger injures Yin (piyin). Such injury goes deeper still—how then preserve life and step free of the limits of embodied things?

Therefore no thief is greater than Yin-Yang imbalance; between Heaven and Earth there is nowhere to escape it. Yet when life is harmed so severely, it is not Yin and Yang themselves that cause it, but joy and anger arising recklessly because the heart-mind is not empty and still. Therefore it is not Yin and Yang that harm people—it is the heart-mind that drives them to do so.

出无本入无窍有实而无乎处有长而无乎本剽有所出而无窍者有实有实而无乎处者宇也有长而无本剽者宙也有乎生有乎死有乎出有乎入入出而无见其形是谓天门天门者无有也万物出乎无有有不能以有为有必出乎无有而无有一无有圣人藏乎是古之人其知有所至矣恶乎至有以为未始有物者至矣尽矣弗可以加矣其次以为有物矣将以生为丧也以死为反也是以分已其次曰始无有既而有生生俄而恶乎至有以为未始有物者至矣尽矣弗可以加矣其次以为有物矣将以生为丧也以死为反也是以分已其次曰始无有既而有生生俄而死以无有为首以生为体以死为尻孰知有无死生之一守者吾与之为友是三者虽异公族也昭景也着戴也甲氏也着封也非一也有生黬也披然曰移是尝言移是非所言也虽然不可知者也腊者之有膍胲可散而不可散也观室者周于寝庙又适其偃焉为是举移是请尝言移是是以生为本以知为师因以乘是非果有名实因以己为质使人以为己节因以死偿节若然者以用为知以不用为愚以彻为名以穷为辱移是今之人也是蜩与鸴鸠同于同也蹍市人之足则辞以放骜兄则以妪大亲则已矣
Interpretation

Things appear without any root source, and their entry has no opening or pore. They have reality yet no fixed abode; they have continuity yet no beginning or end. What appears without pores is still real. Reality without a fixed abode is Yu (space); continuity without beginning or end is Zhou (time). There is birth and death, exit and entry, yet entry and exit leave no visible trace—this is called the Tianmen (Heaven’s Gate, the portal through which all things pass). The Tianmen is wuyou (non-being). All things emerge from non-being. What already is cannot beget further “being” from “being”; it must arise from non-being—and that non-being is sheer nothingness. The sage takes refuge there.

The ancients’ understanding reached a certain point—but to what point? Some held that there never were things at all; that is the utmost limit, beyond which one cannot go further. Next were those who granted that things exist, yet treated birth as loss and death as return; from this, distinctions arose. Still others said: at first there was nothing, then there was birth, and birth soon passed into death. They took non-being as the head, birth as the body, and death as the tailbone (wei). Whoever grasps that being and non-being, death and life, guard one and the same thing—I will befriend him. These three views differ, yet belong to one lineage, much as the Zhao and Jing clans won renown through the offices they held, while the Jia clan won renown through the fief it received—not the same kind of fame at all.

Once life appears, it is like a dark stain (yi); people then take to “yishi” (shifting what counts as right and wrong). Try to explain yishi: it is not something speech can pin down; even so, there is no way to know it for certain. At the year-end la sacrifice, the entrails and hooves laid out for offering can be arranged separately, yet cannot truly be split apart; someone touring a house may walk through bedchambers and the ancestral hall, and still end up in the privy. That is why yishi is brought up.

yishi means: taking life as the root and the knowing mind as teacher, and on that basis dividing right from wrong; once one insists that names and facts are real, one makes oneself the measure, expects others to follow one’s standards, even trading life for those standards. Then being employed counts as cleverness, not being employed as stupidity; success as reputation, hardship as shame. yishi is what people do today; they share the same cramped outlook as the cicada and the wren.

Step on a stranger’s foot in the street and you apologize, calling yourself rude; step on an elder brother’s foot and a word of comfort suffices; step on your parents’ foot and no further reckoning is needed.

生者从无而入有故曰出无本死者从有而入无故曰入无窍无本无窍则安有其形乎故曰无见其形无见其形则自然而出入也故曰是谓天门天门出于自然岂为有形乎故曰天门者无有也故无有者道之真体而万物莫不曰入无窍无本无窍则安有其形乎故曰无见其形无见其形则自然而出入也故曰是谓天门天门出于自然岂为有形乎故曰天门者无有也故无有者道之真体而万物莫不皆由之故曰万物出乎无有无有岂以有而为有乎此万物必由而已矣故曰有不能以有为有必出乎无有道既无有而复能抱一于无有则此圣人之所以藏用而任其无有也故曰而无有一无有圣人藏乎是此庄子寓言道之至妙也 故曰至礼有不人至义不物至知不谋至仁无亲至信辟金 至礼无体故曰有不人至义无宜故曰不物至智无知故曰不谋有一无有圣人藏乎是此庄子寓言道之至妙也 故曰至礼有不人至义不物至知不谋至仁无亲至信辟金 至礼无体故曰有不人至义无宜故曰不物至智无知故曰不谋至仁无爱故曰无亲至信无质故曰辟金五者皆以无为体则合于大道之妙矣 彻志之勃解心之谬去德之累达道之塞贵富显严名利六者勃志也容动色理气意六者谬心也恶欲喜怒哀乐六者累德也去就取与知能六者塞道也此四六者不荡胸中则正正则静静则明明则虚虚则无为而无不为也
Interpretation

To be alive is to pass from “non-being” (wu) into “being” (you); hence birth has no traceable origin—it is called “emerging from non-being without a root.” To die is to return from “being” to “non-being”; hence death has no aperture one can enter—it is called “entering non-being without an opening.” With neither root nor opening, what form could there be to see? That is why we say its form cannot be seen. When form is unseen, coming and going are simply spontaneous—this is called the Tianmen (the gate through which the myriad things naturally enter and leave). The Tianmen arises from spontaneity; it is not a concrete thing—so the Tianmen is said to be “non-being without being” (wu you). Only this “non-being without being” is the true substance of the Dao (the Way); the myriad things all issue from it—hence “the myriad things come from non-being without being.” That non-being does not become “being” by relying on “being”; things merely must pass through it. Therefore “being” cannot beget “being” from “being”; it must be generated from non-being without being. Though the Dao is non-being without being, within it one can still “embrace the One” (bao yi)—hold fast to the single authentic reality. The sage therefore hides his efficacy and entrusts himself to non-being without being—hence “yet there is non-being without being; the sage keeps himself therein.” This is Zhuangzi using parable to point at the utmost subtlety of the Dao.

Hence it is also said: the utmost li (ritual propriety) has no fixation on “person”; the utmost yi (right conduct) has no fixation on “things”; the utmost zhi (knowing) does not plot; the utmost ren (humaneness) has no partial kinship; the utmost xin (trustworthiness) dispenses with gold as pledge.

The highest ritual has no fixed ceremony, so it does not insist on distinctions between self and other; the highest conduct is not tied to which particular act counts as fitting, so it does not cling to things; the highest knowing does not depend on cleverness, so it does not scheme; the highest humaneness has no favorites, so it has no private partiality; the highest trustworthiness does not use tangible goods as security, so it sets aside gold and the like as tokens of faith (bi jin). These five take “non-being” as their root, and thus accord with the subtlety of the great Dao.

Remove what stirs the mind, release what tangles the heart, cast off what burdens De (virtue/power), and clear what blocks the Dao. Nobility, wealth, prominence, dignity, fame, profit, and emolument—these six disturb the mind. Countenance, bearing, expression, tone of speech, breath, and emotional intent—these six bewilder the heart. Aversion, desire, joy, anger, grief, and pleasure—these six drag down De. Leaving and approaching, taking and giving, cleverness and talent—these six obstruct the great Dao. When these four groups—twenty-four items in all—do not churn in the breast, the heart is upright; upright, it is still; still, it is clear; clear, it is empty and open; empty and open, one can practice Wuwei (non-action), and nothing cannot be accomplished. This is what the Daoist tradition calls inner cultivation: not reliance on outer ceremony, but keeping the heart from being stirred by these things.

彻志之勃则志一也解心之谬则心虚也去德之累则自得也达道之塞则不蔽也志一则贵富难役也显严难威也利名难动也心虚则容动自安也色理自顺也气意自适也自得则恶欲不生也则心虚也去德之累则自得也达道之塞则不蔽也志一则贵富难役也显严难威也利名难动也心虚则容动自安也色理自顺也气意自适也自得则恶欲不生也喜怒不出也哀乐不入也不蔽则去就必谨也取与必宜也知能必当也数者不能乱志谬心累德塞道则胸中所以正静明虚而无为而为也故曰彻志之勃解心之谬去德之累达道之塞贵富显严名利六者勃志也容动色理气意六者谬心也恶欲喜怒哀乐六者累德也去就取与知能六者塞道也此四六者不荡胸中则正正则静静则明明则虚虚则无为而无不为也 道者德之钦也生者德之光也性者生之质也性之动谓之为为之伪谓之失知者接也知者谟也知者之所不知犹睨也动以不得已之谓德动无非我之谓治名相反而实相顺也 道者至妙而尊于德也故曰道者德之钦也生者以适来而得之明也故曰生者德之光也性者至静而生之本也故曰性者生德动无非我之谓治名相反而实相顺也
Interpretation

Sweep away the agitation of the mind, and the mind will become single-minded; release the confusion of the heart, and the inner self will become empty and still; remove the burdens on virtue, and one can be at ease in oneself; clear the blockages of the Great Dao, and one will no longer be obscured. When the mind is single-minded, wealth and rank can hardly enslave you, prominence and authority can hardly subdue you, fame and profit can hardly shake you. When the inner self is empty and still, bearing and conduct naturally settle, expression and principle naturally flow, breath and intention naturally rest at ease. When one can be at ease in oneself, aversion and greed do not arise, joy and anger do not burst outward, sorrow and delight do not invade the inner heart. When no longer obscured, going and staying are necessarily careful, taking and giving necessarily fit, cleverness and talent are necessarily applied aptly. None of these can disturb the mind, confuse the heart, burden virtue, or block the Great Dao—so the breast is upright, quiet, clear, and open, and one acts with purpose through wuwei (acting in accord with nature, without forced contrivance).

Therefore it is said: sweep away the agitation of the mind, release the confusion of the heart, remove the burdens on virtue, and clear the blockages of the Great Dao. Wealth, rank, prominence, authority, reputation, and emolument—six items that stir the mind; bearing, conduct, expression, reasoning, breath, and intention—six that bewilder the heart; aversion, desire, joy, anger, sorrow, and delight—six that burden virtue; going and staying, taking and giving, cleverness and talent—six that block the Great Dao. When these four groups, twenty-four items in all, do not surge within the breast, the person can be upright; upright, then quiet; quiet, then clear; clear, then open and empty; open and empty, then wuwei—and wuwei can accomplish all without forcing.

The Dao is what De (Virtue/Power) holds in reverence; life is the radiance of De; nature (xing) is the substance of life. When nature stirs into activity, it is called “acting”; when action slips into false contrivance, it is called “losing.” Knowing is contact with outer things; knowing is also inward deliberation. What people cannot know is like looking sidelong—you see only one corner. Action that arises from having no choice is called De; action that is never not from one’s own nature is called “well-ordered.” The names oppose each other, yet the realities accord with each other.

The Dao is supremely subtle and is honored by De—hence “the Dao is what De reveres.” Life is the light received as the seasons turn—hence “life is the radiance of De.” Nature is utterly still and is the root of life—hence speaking of nature in relation to life. Action that all issues from oneself is called “well-ordered”; the names oppose, yet the realities accord.

道者至妙而尊于德也故曰道者德之钦也生者以适来而得之明也故曰生者德之光也性者至静而生之本也故曰性者生之质也性感物则必动也故曰性之动谓之为为本人为则非得也故曰为之伪谓之失 羿工乎中防而拙乎使人无已誉圣人工乎天而拙乎人夫工乎天而俍乎人者唯全人能之唯虫能虫唯虫能天全人恶天恶人之天而况吾天乎人乎一雀适羿羿必得之威也以天下为之笼则雀无所逃是故汤以庖人笼伊尹秦穆公以五羊之皮笼百里奚是故非以其所好笼之而可天乎人乎一雀适羿羿必得之威也以天下为之笼则雀无所逃是故汤以庖人笼伊尹秦穆公以五羊之皮笼百里奚是故非以其所好笼之而可得者无有也介者拸画外非誉也胥靡登高而不惧遗死生也夫复謵不馈而忘人忘人因以为天人矣故敬之而不喜侮之而不怒者唯同乎天和者为然出怒不怒则怒出于不怒矣出为无为则为出于无为矣 羿工乎中防而拙乎使人无誉已者所谓使人忘我难是也圣人工乎天而拙乎人者所谓使天下兼忘我难是也至于神人则其道合于天其用利于人鼔舞万物而不与圣人同忧所谓兼忘而圣人工乎天而拙乎人者所谓使天下兼忘我难是也至于神人则其道合于天其用利于人鼔舞万物而不与圣人同忧所谓兼忘而已矣故曰工乎天而俍乎人者唯全人能之
Interpretation

Dao is the most subtle and more honored than De; hence it is said that Dao is what De reveres. Life arrives in its season and thereby shows clarity; hence it is said that life is the radiance of De. Xing (human nature) is utterly still and void, the root of life; hence it is said that xing is the substance of life. When xing contacts outer things it necessarily stirs into activity; hence it is said that the stirring of xing is called wei (acting). If such wei comes from deliberate human contrivance, it is not what is naturally attained; hence it is said that contrived wei is called shi (loss).

Yi (the ancient divine archer) was skilled at hitting the finest targets yet poor at making people stop praising him. The sage is skilled at complying with the natural yet poor at responding to human affairs. One who can both follow Heaven and treat people well—only the quanren (person of complete virtue) can achieve this. Only insects can rest content as insects, and only insects can naturally accord with Heaven. The quanren does not despise Heaven; what he despises is the “Heaven” that humans contrive; how much more so when people still divide “my Heaven” from “my human side.”

When a sparrow flies into the range of Yi’s bow, Yi is sure to take it—that is his power. If the whole world were treated as a cage, the sparrow would have nowhere to flee. Thus King Tang of Shang won Yiyin through the path of a kitchen steward, and Duke Mu of Qin won Baili Xi with five sheets of sheepskin. To win someone without pandering to what pleases him—such a thing has never happened.

One who has suffered foot amputation no longer adorns himself, having set aside fame and blame. A convict climbing high does not fear, having forgotten life and death. If one repeatedly habituates to the Dao, even gifts and exchanges can be released, and thus one forgets others; forgetting others, one can become one with Heaven. Therefore only one who accords with tianhe (natural harmony) can be honored without joy and insulted without anger. When anger arises, one does not dwell in it—that is anger issuing from non-anger. When one acts, one has no mind bent on acting—that is action issuing from wuwei (non-assertive action in accord with nature).

Yi’s skill at hitting fine targets yet difficulty in making others forget to praise him means that “making people forget me” is hard. The sage’s skill at following nature yet awkwardness in human affairs means that “making the whole world forget even oneself” is hard. As for the shenren (spirit-person united with Dao), his Dao accords with Heaven, his influence benefits people, and he inspires the ten thousand things without the sage’s anxious care—this is merely jianwang (mutual forgetting on both sides). Thus it is said: only the quanren can both fit the natural and handle human affairs well.

欲静则平气欲神则顺心有为也欲当则缘于不得已不得已之圣人之道 气者静之所宅也心者神之所潜也平气之所适则必静也故曰欲静则平气顺心之所为则必神也故曰欲神则顺心有为也能平气顺心则动非妄动而俟其感而后应也故曰欲当则缘于不得已夫感而后应岂有心于万物乎非圣人孰能至于此故曰不得已之圣人之道也 南华真经新传卷十一 钦定四库全书 南华真经新传卷十二 宋 王雱 撰 徐无篇 夫能平心顺气以道为务而忘于贫贱穷达则入于至人之域此徐无之能若是矣庄子因而作徐无篇
Interpretation

To seek quiet, one must first settle the qi; to seek shen (spirit and inner clarity), one must first follow the heart-mind as it naturally is. If one wants right action in what one does, it must arise from having no choice (acting only when circumstances force one to, not from deliberate scheming). Whoever can act from having no choice follows the way of the sage.

Qi is the dwelling of stillness; the heart-mind is where shen hides. When qi is balanced and smooth, one is necessarily quiet—hence “to seek quiet, settle the qi.” When one acts in line with the heart’s nature, one necessarily attains shen—hence “to seek shen, follow the heart.” In action, if one can settle qi and follow the heart, one’s movement is not reckless impulse but response only after things touch one—hence “to seek what is fitting, rely on having no choice.” Responding after being touched—how is that premeditating toward the myriad things? Who but a sage can do this? So “having no choice” is precisely the sage’s way.

New Commentary on the Nanhua Zhenjing (Zhuangzi commentary), juan 11.

Complete Library of the Four Treasures: New Commentary on the Nanhua Zhenjing, juan 12, by Wang Fu of the Song (son of Wang Anshi).

“Xu Wugui” chapter: If one can settle the heart and nurture qi in accord, take the Dao as what matters, and forget poverty, wealth, obscurity, and prominence, one enters the realm of the zhenren (person who has reached the utmost in attaining the Dao). Xu Wugui could do this; Zhuangzi therefore wrote this chapter.

Xu Wugui, via Nü Shang: If one can settle the heart and follow qi, take the Dao as what matters, and forget poverty and wealth, obscurity and prominence, one enters the realm of the zhenren. Xu Wugui could do this; Zhuangzi therefore wrote the “Xu Wugui” chapter.

徐无因女商篇 夫能平心顺气以道为务而忘于贫贱穷达则入于至人之域此徐无之能若是矣庄子因而作徐无篇 徐无因女商见魏武侯武侯劳之曰先生病矣苦于山林之劳顾乃肯见于寡人徐无曰我则劳于君君有何劳于我君将盈嗜欲长好恶则性命之情病矣君将黜嗜欲掔好恶则耳目病矣我将劳君君有何劳于我武侯超然不对少焉徐无曰尝语君吾相狗也下之质执饱而止是狸德也中之质若视日上之质若忘其一吾相狗又不若吾相马也吾相马直者中绳曲者中钩方者中矩圆者中规是国马也而未若天下马也天下马有成材若恤若失若丧其一若是者超轶绝尘不知其所武侯大悦而徐无出女商曰先生独何以说吾君乎吾所以说吾君者横说之则马也天下马有成材若恤若失若丧其一若是者超轶绝尘不知其所武侯大悦而徐无出女商曰先生独何以说吾君乎吾所以说吾君者横说之则以诗书礼乐从说之则以金板六弢奉事而大有功者不可为数而吾君未尝启齿
Interpretation

Xu Wugui (a reclusive sage of the mountains) was brought before Marquis Wu of Wei at the introduction of Nü Shang (a minister of Wei). The marquis greeted him with concern: “You have taken on a great burden, sir! Life in the hills is so hard—yet you were willing to come and see me.” Xu Wugui replied, “It is I who ought to worry over you—why should you comfort me? If you indulge your appetites and feed your likes and dislikes, the true nature of your life and vitality will be injured; if you shut out appetites and rein in likes and dislikes, your ears and eyes will feel oppressed. So it is I who should worry for you—what is there for you to comfort me about?” The marquis looked blank and said nothing.

After a while Xu Wugui said, “Let me try telling you how I judge dogs. The lowest sort eat their fill and stop—no more than the nature of a wild cat. The middling sort have a gaze like one staring at the sun. The highest sort seem to have forgotten themselves. When I judge dogs, I am still not judging as well as when I judge horses. In horses I look for this: what is straight fits the cord, what is bent fits the hook, what is square fits the square, what is round fits the compass—that is a good horse within one state, yet it still falls short of the finest horse under heaven. The finest horse under heaven has its native endowment already complete; its spirit seems troubled and adrift, as though it had forgotten even itself. Such a horse gallops beyond the common run without raising dust, so that one cannot tell where it has gone.” The marquis was greatly pleased and laughed.

When Xu Wugui had withdrawn, Nü Shang said, “With what sort of words did the gentleman finally move our lord? When I counsel him, speaking across I draw on the Poetry, Documents, Rites, and Music; speaking lengthwise I draw on the Golden Board and Six Bows—those who have served the state and won great merit are beyond counting, yet the lord has never once opened his mouth to praise them.”

老子曰道者万物之奥也善人之所宝也夫善人之所以宝于道则外所以忘其形内所以虚其心黜嗜欲忘好恶安于性命之情而所以宝全于道也不善之人则不然其于道也若存而若亡外所以不能全其形内所以不能虚其心充嗜欲专好恶决于性命之情而其于道也岂宝欤此魏武侯闻徐无之言而超然不对也夫武侯之亡外所以不能全其形内所以不能虚其心充嗜欲专好恶决于性命之情而其于道也岂宝欤此魏武侯闻徐无之言而超然不对也夫武侯之性中材也不可卒告以至道而宜先悦之以所好此无所以有相狗马之言也然无非能相于狗马也故寓入道之意于狗马以狗之上质则若亡其一以天下之马则有成材所谓若亡其一者以形全神王而能忘其身也所谓有成材者以德宇泰定而不亏其本也能忘其身则无为不亏其本则无用无为无用则所以能入于道也此无寓意之若是而武侯不知其意而徒悦其言也故曰大悦而笑
Interpretation

Laozi said: The Dao is the profound dwelling of the ten thousand things and a treasure that the good cherish. Good people cherish the Dao because outwardly they can forget the body, inwardly they can keep the heart empty and still, remove craving and desire, forget likes and dislikes, and rest in the true condition of nature and life—therefore they cherish the Dao and preserve themselves through it.

Those who are not good are the opposite. For them the Dao seems present yet absent: outwardly they cannot preserve the body, inwardly they cannot empty and still the heart; craving and desire fill them, they cling to likes and dislikes, and turn away from the true condition of nature and life. Can that still be called cherishing the Dao? Duke Wu of Wei (a ruler of Wei in the Warring States period) was exactly like this. Unable to preserve the body or empty and still the heart, with desires overflowing and fixated on likes and dislikes, turning away from the true condition of nature and life—how could he cherish the Dao? So when he heard the words of Xu Wugu (a recluse), his expression was distant and he could not respond.

Duke Wu was only of middling capacity; one must not abruptly tell him the supreme Dao. One should first follow his inclinations to please him—hence Xu Wugu spoke of judging dogs and horses (discerning quality in dogs and horses). He was not truly an expert at judging dogs and horses; he lodged the meaning of entering the Dao within those words. The highest quality in a dog is “as if one part were missing”; the horse of the world (the finest horse under heaven) is one that “has formed talent.” “As if one part were missing” means the form is whole and the spirit is sovereign—able to forget oneself. “Has formed talent” means virtue is vast, calm, and settled, without injuring the root. To forget the body is Wuwei (non-action); not injuring the root is “non-use” (not spending one’s original nature on utility). Only through Wuwei and non-use can one enter the Dao. The meaning is thus—but Duke Wu did not grasp it; he merely liked the words, so he was greatly pleased and laughed.

今先生何以说吾君使吾君说若此乎徐无曰吾直告之吾相狗马耳女商曰若是乎曰子不闻夫越之流人乎去国数日见其所知而喜去国旬月见所尝见于国中者喜及期年也见似人者而喜矣不亦去人滋久思人滋深乎夫逃虚空者子不闻夫越之流人乎去国数日见其所知而喜去国旬月见所尝见于国中者喜及期年也见似人者而喜矣不亦去人滋久思人滋深乎夫逃虚空者藜藋柱乎鼪鼬之迳踉位其空闻人足音跫然而喜矣而况乎昆弟亲戚之謦欬其侧者乎久矣夫莫以真人之言謦欬吾君之侧乎徐无见武侯武侯曰先生居山林食芧栗厌葱韭以宾寡人久矣夫今老邪其欲干酒肉之味邪其寡人亦有社稷之福邪徐无曰无生于贫贱未尝敢饮食君之酒肉将来劳君也君曰何哉奚劳寡人曰劳君之神与形武侯曰何谓人亦有社稷之福邪徐无曰无生于贫贱未尝敢饮食君之酒肉将来劳君也君曰何哉奚劳寡人曰劳君之神与形武侯曰何谓邪徐无曰天地之养也一登高不可以为长居下不可以为短君独为万乘之主以苦一国之民以养耳目鼻口夫神者不自许也夫神者好和而恶奸夫奸病也故劳之唯君所病之何也武侯曰欲见先生久矣
Interpretation

The merchant woman asked: What did the gentleman say to our ruler that made him so pleased?

Xu Wugui said: I only told him that I can tell good dogs and horses from bad ones.

She said: Is that really all?

Xu Wugui said: Have you never heard of people who fled from Yue? After a few days away from home, they are glad to see anyone they know; after ten days or a month, they are glad to see anyone they once saw back home; after a full year, they are glad even to see someone who merely looks human. Is it not true that the longer one is cut off from people, the more one longs for them? Someone who has fled into empty wilderness, with weeds choking the paths where weasels run, stumbles about in the open—when he hears footsteps he rejoices. How much more when a brother or kinsman is right beside him, coughing and talking! For a long time no one has spoken to the ruler in the words of a True Person—one who has realized the Dao—and had him listen at his side.

Xu Wugui went to see Duke Wu of Wei. The duke said: You live in the hills, eat acorns and chestnuts, and fill yourself with scallions and leeks; you have kept your distance from me for a long time. Are you old now? Do you want the taste of wine and meat, or does my state also stand to gain some blessing?

Xu Wugui said: I was born in poverty and low station and never dare to enjoy a ruler’s wine and meat. This time I have come to comfort you.

The duke asked: How do you comfort me?

Xu Wugui said: I comfort your spirit and your body.

The duke asked: What does that mean?

Xu Wugui said: Heaven and earth nourish the ten thousand things, and in origin they are one. To stand on high is not for that reason to be lofty; to stay low is not for that reason to be base. You alone are lord of ten thousand chariots, yet you wear out the people of the whole realm to satisfy the desires of your eyes, ears, nose, and mouth. The spirit itself does not approve of this. The spirit loves harmony and hates one-sidedness; one-sidedness is illness. That is why I have come to comfort you. Why should you alone have caught this illness?

The duke said: I have wanted to see you for a long time.

夫天地之于人均受之性命均付之分极至于所养亦均也岂有间于尊卑长防乎故曰天地之养也一魏武不知所然而殚天下之物以养形不足则劳神而营之故神愈劳而不能王形愈养而不能全安若外六骸而忘嗜欲游心于逍遥之域则形神岂有不全乎 吾欲爱民而为义偃兵其可乎徐无曰不可爱民害民之始也为义偃兵造兵之本也君自此为之则殆不成 吾欲爱民而为义偃兵其可乎徐无曰不可爱民害民之始也为义偃兵造兵之本也君自此为之则殆不成凡成美恶器也君虽为仁义几且伪哉形固造形成固有伐变固外战君亦必无盛鹤列于丽谯之间无徒骥于锱坛之宫无藏逆于得无以巧胜人无以谋胜人无以战胜人夫杀人之士民兼人之土地以养吾私与吾神者其战不知孰善胜之恶乎在君若勿已矣修胸中之诚以应天地之情而勿撄夫民死已脱矣君将恶乎用夫偃兵哉
Interpretation

Heaven and Earth treat all people alike: they endow each with the same ming and xing (life and innate disposition), assign each the same allotted role and measure, and provide sustenance in equal measure. How could they discriminate between high and low, or between elder and younger? Therefore it is said that the nurturing of Heaven and Earth is even-handed. Wei Wu (Emperor Wu of Wei, Cao Cao) did not understand this principle. He exhausted the goods of the realm to nourish his own body; finding that still insufficient, he also wearied his spirit in pursuit of more. The more his spirit was strained, the less it could hold sway; the more his body was pampered, the less it could be preserved or kept at ease. If one sets aside the six bodily parts (head, trunk, and four limbs), forgets cravings and desires, and lets the heart-mind roam in carefree ease, how could body and spirit fail to be whole?

“I wish to cherish the people, practice humaneness and righteousness, and stop warfare—is that permissible?” Xu Wugui (a figure in the Zhuangzi who admonishes rulers) said: “It is not. To ‘cherish the people’ is precisely where harm to the people begins; to lay down arms for the sake of humaneness and righteousness is precisely the root from which warfare grows. If you start from here, you will probably not succeed. Whatever wins a fine reputation is an instrument that invites ill consequences. Even if you wish to practice humaneness and righteousness, you will almost certainly slide into hypocrisy. Where there is bodily form, more form is sure to be produced; where there is success, self-congratulation is sure to follow; where there is change, external strife is sure to arise. You must not array crane formations (military ranks) between lofty watchtowers, must not mass infantry, chariots, and horses in the palace altar courts, must not hide rebellious intent within what you seek, and must not use stratagem, scheming, or war to overcome others. Slaughtering another state’s people and annexing another state’s land to feed your private desires and your own heart-mind—in such wars, which side is truly better, and where is the so-called victory? If you cannot stop here, then cultivate sincerity within your breast, accord with the truth of Heaven and Earth, and do not stir things up. Once the people have escaped the disaster of death, what need have you for ‘laying down arms’?”

夫道者无为之朴也兵者有为之器也圣人常无为而民自化所谓兵者置而不用也武侯不能无为而欲为义偃兵以爱民此无所以答之以不可也夫圣人以百姓为刍狗而不爱爱之而其民所以遂生也若以爱爱之则爱有不及而民憝心矣如此则适足以圣人以百姓为刍狗而不爱爱之而其民所以遂生也若以爱爱之则爱有不及而民憝心矣如此则适足以害之也故曰爱民害民之始也以义为外迹而不为为之而物之所以从顺也若以可为而为之则有不当而物必不顺矣如此则适足用兵也故曰为义偃兵造兵之本也不能如此而必爱而必为则治道安得而全矣故曰君自此为之则殆不成
Interpretation

The Dao is the plain and natural state of non-action; weapons are tools born of deliberate action. The sage constantly practices non-action, and the people transform themselves; as for weapons, they are displayed but not employed. Lord Wu of Wei could not achieve non-action, yet wished to practice benevolence and righteousness and halt warfare to love the people—so Xu Wugui, the hermit in this chapter, answered that this would not do.

The sage treats the people as straw dogs (grass dogs used in sacrifice—honored in the rite then discarded, a metaphor for equal regard without partiality), without deliberately “loving” them; only by treating them in this way can the people live in harmony. If one “loves” them through love, love will fail to reach everywhere, the people will resent, and that is enough to harm them. Hence it is said: loving the people is the beginning of harming the people.

Take righteousness as outward show without forcing it into practice; only by not pushing in this way do things comply. If one thinks something can be done and does it, there will be what is inappropriate, things will surely not go smoothly, and that is enough to lead to the use of arms. Hence it is said: stopping warfare in the name of righteousness is the root of making war. If one cannot act thus yet insists on loving and insists on doing, how can the way of governance be preserved? Hence it is said: if the ruler starts from here, he will probably not succeed.

黄帝将见大隗乎具茨之山方明为御昌防骖乘张若謵朋前马昆阍滑稽后车至于襄城之野七圣皆迷无所问涂适遇牧马童子问涂焉曰若知具之山乎曰然若知大隗之所存乎曰然黄帝曰异哉小童非徒知具茨之山又皆迷无所问涂适遇牧马童子问涂焉曰若知具之山乎曰然若知大隗之所存乎曰然黄帝曰异哉小童非徒知具茨之山又知大隗之所存请问为天下小童曰夫为天下者亦若此而已矣又奚事焉予少而自游于六合之内予适有瞀病有长者教予曰若乘日之车而游于襄城之野今予病少痊予又且复游于六合之外夫为天下亦若此而已予又奚事焉黄帝曰夫为天下者则诚非吾子之事虽然请问为天下小童辞黄帝又问小童曰夫为天下者亦奚以异乎牧马者哉亦去其害马者而已矣黄帝再拜稽首称天师而退知士无思虑之变则不乐辩士无谈说之序则不乐察士无凌谇之事则不乐皆囿于物者也招世之士兴朝中民之士荣官筋力之士矜难勇敢之士奋患兵革之士乐战无凌谇之事则不乐皆囿于物者也招世之士兴朝中民之士荣官筋力之士矜难勇敢之士奋患兵革之士乐战枯槁之士宿名法律之士广治礼乐之士敬容仁义之士贵际农夫无草莱之事则不比商贾无市井之事则不比庶人有旦暮之业则劝百工有器械之巧则壮钱财不积则贪者忧权势不尤则夸者悲势物之徒乐变遭时有所用不能无为也此皆顺比于岁不物于易者也驰其形性潜之万物终身不反悲夫庄子曰射者非前期而中谓之善射天下皆羿也可乎惠子曰可庄子曰天下非有公是也而各是其所是天下皆尧也可乎惠子曰可庄子曰然则儒墨杨秉四与夫子为五果孰是邪或者若鲁遽者邪其弟子曰我得夫子之道矣吾能冬爨鼎而夏造氷矣鲁遽曰是直以阳召阳以阴召阴非吾所谓道也吾示子乎吾道于是乎为之调瑟废一于堂废一于室鼓宫子之道矣吾能冬爨鼎而夏造氷矣鲁遽曰是直以阳召阳以阴召阴非吾所谓道也吾示子乎吾道于是乎为之调瑟废一于堂废一于室鼓宫宫动鼔角角动音律同矣夫或改调一于五音无当也鼓之二十五皆动未始异于声而音之君已且若是者邪惠子曰今夫儒墨杨秉且方与我以辩相拂以辞相镇以声而未始吾非也则奚若矣庄子曰齐人蹢子于宋者其命阍也不以完其求钘钟也以束缚其求唐子也而未始出域有遗矣夫楚人寄而蹢阍者夜半于无人之时而与舟人斗未始离于岑而足以造于怨也
Interpretation

The Yellow Emperor was going to Juzhi Mountain to visit Da Wei, a figure said to have attained the Way. Fang Ming drove the chariot, Chang Fang rode as companion on the right, Zhang Ruo and Xie Peng led the horses in front, and Kun Hun and Huaji followed behind. When they reached the outskirts of Xiangcheng, all seven sages lost their way and could find no one to ask. They happened upon a boy tending horses and asked him: “Do you know Juzhi Mountain?” The boy said, “I do.” They asked again: “Do you know where Da Wei lives?” The boy said, “I do.” The Yellow Emperor said, “How strange, child! You not only know Juzhi Mountain but also where Da Wei dwells. Tell us: how should one govern the world?” The boy said, “Governing the world is no more than this—what else is there to fuss over! When I was young I wandered within the four quarters of heaven and earth; by chance I fell ill with dizzying vision, and an elder taught me: ‘Ride the sun-chariot and roam the outskirts of Xiangcheng.’ Now my illness has eased a little, and I will wander again beyond the four quarters. Governing the world is the same—why should I trouble my mind over it?” The Yellow Emperor said, “Governing the world is truly not your affair. Even so, please say something.” The boy declined. The Yellow Emperor pressed him again. The boy said, “Governing the world—how is it different from tending horses! It is only a matter of removing what harms the horses.” The Yellow Emperor bowed twice, touched his forehead to the ground, addressed him as Celestial Master (Tianshi), and withdrew.

Those who live by stratagem are unhappy unless their thinking keeps turning out something new; those who live by disputation are unhappy unless talk follows a ranked order; those who live by nitpicking are unhappy unless they have something to cross-examine and argue over—all of them are tied down by external things. Those who take saving the world as their task want the court to flourish; ordinary scholars take office and rank as glory; the strong and hardy take overcoming hardship as their pride; the brave rise up before disaster; those in armor take battle as their joy. Those who hold to dryness and silence cling to reputation; those who push law spread governance; those who honor ritual and music value ceremony; those who parade benevolence and righteousness stress social ties. Farmers cannot rest without clearing weeds and opening land; merchants cannot rest without market trade. Common people with day-and-night livelihoods urge one another on; craftsmen with skill in tools grow bold in spirit. When wealth does not pile up, the greedy worry; when power is not dazzling, the boastful grieve. Those who chase power and things welcome change; once the times give them an opening, they cannot settle into Wuwei (non-action). All of them merely echo the moment and cannot lift themselves free amid change. They drive body and disposition, drown in the myriad things, and never turn back in a lifetime—how lamentable!

Zhuangzi said: “If an archer hits the mark without having aimed beforehand and is called a fine archer, then everyone under heaven could count as Yi—the legendary archer—could they?” Huizi (Hui Shi) said, “They could.” Zhuangzi said, “Under heaven there is no standard everyone accepts as right; each person takes what he thinks right as right—then everyone could count as Yao—the sage-king—could they?” Huizi said, “They could.” Zhuangzi said, “Then the Ru, Mo, Yang Zhu, and Bing schools—plus you, sir, make five: which is right? Perhaps like Lu Ju? His disciple said: ‘I have obtained my master’s Dao (the Way): I can boil a cauldron in winter and make ice in summer.’ Lu Ju said: ‘That is only using yang to summon yang and yin to summon yin—it is not the Dao I speak of. Let me show you my Dao.’ He tuned two zithers, one placed in the hall, one in an inner room. When he plucked the gong note, the gong note on the other responded; when he plucked the jue note, the jue note responded—because the pitches matched. Suppose he retuned one string so it agreed with none of the five tones; when he plucked it, all twenty-five strings vibrated—the sound did not become two kinds, yet that string had become master of all the tones. Is that what you people are like?” Huizi said: “Nowadays the Ru, Mo, Yang, and Bing schools are debating with me—refuting with words, overwhelming with noise—yet no one has ever shown me wrong. What of that?” Zhuangzi said: “In Qi someone crippled his son and sent him to Song as gatekeeper, not requiring wholeness of limb; when looking for a small bell he tied it carefully with cord, but when searching for a lost son he never left his home village—he had the weighty and the light completely upside down! In Chu someone living abroad quarreled with the gatekeeper and, in the dead of night when no one was about, went to fight the boatman—before the man had even left the shore, enough resentment was already sown.”

大隗者况于大道也具茨之山者况于道体无为而寂然岂有为之圣可求欤此所以言七圣俱迷也惟能放心专气复归于婴儿则然后心得而知之矣故曰牧马童子又曰非徒知具茨之山又知大隗之所存也夫知大道之真体则任于无为而已矣此所以答黄帝为天下则曰又奚事者则无为虚静而山又知大隗之所存也夫知大道之真体则任于无为而已矣此所以答黄帝为天下则曰又奚事者则无为虚静而放心于自得之场气马旡所适而已故曰为天下者亦奚以异乎牧马夫气马无所适则外物不能为累也故曰亦去其害马者而已矣此皆极于自然而天地万物所以皆宗师此黄帝所以称之为天师也
Interpretation

Da Wei (the divine being they sought, a metaphor for the Great Dao) stands for the Great Way; Mount Juci (a mountain name, metaphor for the substance of the Dao) stands for the still, wuwei (non-action) body of the Dao. How could a sage who acts with deliberate intent ever find it? That is why all seven sages lost their way. Only by releasing fixed ideas and concentrating the breath, returning to the state of an infant (reverting to pure simplicity and freedom from desire), can the heart truly know and understand—hence he is called the horse-tending boy; and it is also said that he not only knew Mount Juci but knew where Da Wei dwelt. To know the true body of the Great Dao is simply to rest in wuwei. So when asked how the Yellow Emperor (an ancient ruler) should govern the realm, he answered, “Why trouble yourself with so much?”: wuwei and quiet emptiness, keeping the heart in a state of self-contentment—the breath-horse (using the horse as a metaphor for vital breath) has nowhere it must go. Thus governing the realm is no different from tending horses. When the breath-horse seeks nothing, outer things cannot drag it down; so it is enough merely to remove what harms the horses. All of this reaches the utmost of naturalness; heaven, earth, and the myriad things therefore take this as their model, and the Yellow Emperor for that reason called him Celestial Master (a teacher aligned with the Way of Heaven).

庄子送过惠子之墓顾谓从者曰郢人垩漫其鼻端若蝇翼使匠石斫之匠石运斤成风听而斫之尽垩而鼻不伤郢人立不失容宋元君闻之召匠石曰尝试为寡人为之匠石曰臣则尝能斫之虽然臣之质死久矣自夫子之死也吾无以为质矣吾无与言之矣管仲有病桓公问之曰仲父之病病矣可不谓云至于大病则寡人恶乎属国而可管仲曰公谁欲与公曰鲍叔牙曰不可吾无以为质矣吾无与言之矣管仲有病桓公问之曰仲父之病病矣可不谓云至于大病则寡人恶乎属国而可管仲曰公谁欲与公曰鲍叔牙曰不可其为人洁防善士也其于不已若者不比之又一闻人之过终身不忘使之治国上且钩乎君下且逆乎民其得罪于君也将弗久矣公曰然则孰可对曰勿已则隰朋可其为人也上忘而下畔愧不若皇帝而哀不已若者以德分人谓之圣以财分人谓之贤以贤临人未有得人者也以贤下人未有不得人者也其于国有不闻也其于家有不见也勿已则隰朋可吴王浮于江登乎狙之山众狙见之恂然弃而走逃于蓁有一狙焉委蛇攫见巧乎王王射之敏给搏捷矢王命相者趋射之狙执死王顾谓其友颜不疑曰之狙也伐其巧恃其便以敖予以至此殛也戒之哉嗟乎无以汝色骄人哉颜不疑归而师董梧以锄其色去乐辞显三巧恃其便以敖予以至此殛也戒之哉嗟乎无以汝色骄人哉颜不疑归而师董梧以锄其色去乐辞显三年而国人称之南伯子綦几而坐仰天而嘘颜成子入见曰夫子物之尤也形固可使若槁骸心固可使若死灰乎曰吾尝居山穴之中矣当是时也田禾一睹我而齐国之众三贺之我必先之彼故知之我必卖之彼故鬻之若我而不有之彼恶得而知之若我而不卖之彼恶得而鬻之嗟乎我悲人之自丧者吾又悲夫悲人者吾又悲夫悲人之悲者其后而日远矣仲尼之楚楚王觞之孙叔敖执爵而立市南宜僚受酒而祭曰古之人乎于此言已曰丘也闻不言之言矣未之尝言于此乎言之市南宜僚弄丸而两家之难解孙叔敖甘寝秉羽而郢人投兵丘愿有喙三尺彼之谓不道之道此之谓不言之辩故德总乎道之所一而言休乎知之所不知至矣道之所一者德不能同也知之所不能知者辩不能举也名谓不道之道此之谓不言之辩故德总乎道之所一而言休乎知之所不知至矣道之所一者德不能同也知之所不能知者辩不能举也名若儒墨而凶矣故海不辞东流大之至也庄子之所言非得已而言之也非惠子不能知之惠子死则孰能知庄子之言矣此所以引匠石为况而又曰吾无与言之矣
Interpretation

When Zhuangzi went to attend a funeral and passed by Huizi’s grave, he turned to his attendants and said: In the state of Ying there was a man who smeared white plaster on the tip of his nose until it was as thin as a fly’s wing, and had Craftsman Shi slice it off. Craftsman Shi swung his axe with a gust of wind and lopped it away in one stroke—the plaster was gone, the nose unharmed, and the man stood there unchanged in expression. Lord Yuan of Song heard of this and summoned Craftsman Shi, saying: Try doing that for me. Craftsman Shi said: I could indeed do it, but the one who matched me has been dead a long while. Zhuangzi added: Since Master Huizi died, I too have had no one to match me—no one with whom I can truly talk.

When Guan Zhong was gravely ill, Duke Huan of Qi asked him: Your illness is very serious; we cannot put this off. If the moment of crisis comes, to whom should I entrust the government? Guan Zhong said: Whom does Your Lordship have in mind? The duke said: Baoshu Ya. Guan Zhong said: That will not do. He is upright and a good man, yet he will not draw close to those he deems beneath him, and once he hears of someone’s fault he never forgets it for life. Put him in charge of the state and he will constrain the ruler above and go against the people below; offending the ruler would not take long. The duke said: Then who will do? Guan Zhong said: If there is no choice, Suipeng will do. Above, he can forget himself; below, he does not make people turn away. He feels himself inferior to the Yellow Emperor, yet can pity those inferior to himself. To share virtue and kindness with others is called sagely; to share goods and wealth with others is called worthy. To tower over others with worth cannot win hearts; to place one’s worth below others wins every heart. In state affairs he may leave things unasked; in household matters he may leave things unexamined. If there is no choice, use Suipeng.

The King of Wu was boating on the Yangzi and climbed the mountain where a troop of monkeys lived. When the monkeys saw him they fled in panic into dense thorn thickets—except one, which leisurely climbed and scratched, showing off its agility to the king. The king shot at it; it nimbly caught the flying arrow. The king ordered his attendants to shoot together in haste, and the monkey was killed. The king said to his friend Yan Bu Yi: This monkey flaunted its skill and, trusting in its quick body, looked down on me—so it came to this end. Take warning: do not treat people with arrogant bearing in face and manner. Yan Bu Yi went home and took Master Dong Wu as his teacher, shedding arrogant looks, leaving indulgent pleasure, and giving up rank and glory; after three years the people of the state all praised him.

Nanbo Zikui leaned on his armrest, sitting with head thrown back, exhaling slowly. Yan Chengzi came in and said: Sir, you are truly outstanding. Can the body truly be made like withered bone, the mind like dead ashes? Nanbo Zikui said: I once lived in a mountain cave. Then Tian He, lord of Qi, came to visit me, and the people of Qi congratulated him again and again. Surely I had first revealed something, and only then did he know me; surely I had advertised and sold myself, and only then did he come to proclaim it. If I had not held these things, how would he have known? If I had not sold myself, how would he have broadcast it? Alas—I grieve for those who lose their true self, and grieve for those who grieve for others, and grieve for those who grieve over such grieving; after that I day by day moved farther from all this.

When Confucius went to Chu, the king of Chu set out wine to entertain him. Sun Shu Ao stood holding the cup; Shinan Yiliao received the wine and performed the sacrifice, saying: In antiquity people had words to speak on such occasions. Confucius said: I have heard of wordless speech but never spoken of it—I will speak of it here. Shinan Yiliao merely juggled pellets, and the crisis between two houses was resolved; Sun Shu Ao slept peacefully with fan in hand, and the people of Ying laid down their weapons. Even with a mouth three feet long I could not say it all. What they practiced was a Way (Dao) that does not rely on the usual path; what is spoken of here is disputation that uses no words. Thus when De (Virtue/Power) returns to the unity of the Way, words stop where intellect cannot know—this is the utmost. What the Way unifies, De cannot equal; what intellect cannot know, argument cannot enumerate; to contend for fame like the Ru and Mo schools is perilous. The great sea does not reject east-flowing water—only then does it reach the utmost greatness.

Zhuangzi’s words are spoken only when there is no other choice. Without Huizi, they could not be understood. When Huizi died, who could still understand Zhuangzi’s words? So he uses Craftsman Shi as a comparison, and says again: I have no one with whom to talk.

圣人并包天地泽及天下而不知其谁氏是故生无爵死无谥实不聚名不立此之谓大人狗不以善吠为良人不以善言为贤而况为大乎夫为大不足以为大而况为德乎夫大备矣莫若天地然奚求焉而大备矣知大备者无求无失无弃不以物易己也反已而不穷循古而不摩大人之诚子綦有八子陈诸前召九方歅曰为我相吾子孰为祥九方歅曰捆也为祥子綦瞿然喜曰奚若曰捆也将与国君同食以物易己也反已而不穷循古而不摩大人之诚子綦有八子陈诸前召九方歅曰为我相吾子孰为祥九方歅曰捆也为祥子綦瞿然喜曰奚若曰捆也将与国君同食以终其身子綦索然出涕曰吾子何为以至于是极也九方歅曰夫与国君同食泽及三族而况于父母乎今夫子闻之而泣是御福也子则祥矣父则不祥子綦曰歅汝何足以识之而捆祥邪尽于酒肉入于鼻口矣而何足以知其所自来吾未尝为牧而牂生于奥未尝好田而鹑生于宎若勿怪何邪吾所与吾子游者游于天地吾与之邀乐于天吾与之邀食于地吾不与之为事不与之为谋不与之为怪吾与之乘天地之诚而不以物与之相撄吾与之一委蛇而不与之为事所宜今也然有世俗之偿焉凡有怪征者必有怪行殆乎非我与吾子之罪几天与之也吾以是泣也无为事所宜今也然有世俗之偿焉凡有怪征者必有怪行殆乎非我与吾子之罪几天与之也吾以是泣也无几何而使捆之于燕盗得之于道全而鬻之则难不若刖之则易于是刖而鬻之于齐适当渠公之街终身食肉而终啮缺遇许由曰子将奚之曰将逃尧曰奚谓邪曰夫尧畜畜然仁吾恐其为天下笑后世其人与人相食与夫民不难聚也爱之则亲利之则至誉之则劝致其所恶则散爱利出乎仁义捐仁义者寡利仁义者众夫仁义之行唯且无诚且假夫贪禽者嚣嚣是以一人之断制利天下譬之犹一覕也夫尧知贤人之利天下也而不知其贼天下也夫惟外乎贤者知之矣有暧姝者有濡需者有卷娄者所谓暧姝者学一先生之言则暧暧人之利天下也而不知其贼天下也夫惟外乎贤者知之矣有暧姝者有濡需者有卷娄者所谓暧姝者学一先生之言则暧暧姝姝而私自说也自以为足矣而未知未始有物也是以谓暧姝者也濡需者豕虱是也择防鬣自以为广宫大囿奎蹄曲隈乳间股脚自以为安室利处不知屠者之一旦鼓臂布草操烟火而已与豕俱焦也此以域进此以域退此其所谓濡需者也卷娄者舜也羊肉不慕蚁蚁慕羊肉羊肉膻也舜有膻行百姓悦之故三徙成都至邓之墟而十有万家尧闻舜之贤举之童土之地曰冀得其来之泽舜举乎童土之地年齿长矣聪明衰矣而不得休归所谓卷娄者也大人者德之所以充实也德之充实则处上而不贵功成而不居赡足万物而不知其所用衣被天下而无得而为称此大人之道若是矣故曰生无爵死无谥实不聚名不立此之谓大人夫爵谥者度外之物也名实者天下之虚器万物而不知其所用衣被天下而无得而为称此大人之道若是矣故曰生无爵死无谥实不聚名不立此之谓大人夫爵谥者度外之物也名实者天下之虚器也大人岂有心于四者乎此庄子所以有无立之言也
Interpretation

The sage embraces Heaven and Earth; his grace reaches all under heaven, yet people do not know who he is. Thus while he lives he holds no noble rank; when he dies he receives no posthumous title; he does not hoard wealth or seek a name. Such a one is called the “Great Person”—someone whose virtue is complete and who accords with the Dao.

A dog is not judged a good dog merely for barking well; a person is not judged worthy merely for speaking well—how much less can one become “great” by trying? Even deliberate striving to be great falls short of true greatness; how much more so deliberate striving to cultivate De? When it comes to completeness of greatness, nothing surpasses Heaven and Earth—yet Heaven and Earth never seek anything. Because they seek nothing, they are complete in this way. Whoever understands this completeness seeks nothing, loses nothing, rejects nothing, and does not trade himself away for external things. He returns to himself without exhaustion and follows the ancient Way without fading or straying—this is the Great Person’s sincerity.

Ziqi had eight sons. He had them stand before him and summoned Jiufang E, saying, “Look at these boys for me—which one is blessed?” Jiufang E said, “Kun is blessed.” Ziqi was startled and pleased, and asked, “In what way?” The answer was, “Kun will eat at the same table as a lord of the state, and so until the end of his life.” Ziqi’s face fell; he wept and said, “How could my son come to this?” Jiufang E said, “To eat with a lord of the state—favor can reach the three clans (father’s, mother’s, and wife’s kin), let alone the parents. Now you hear this and weep—you are refusing blessing. The son is auspicious; the father is not.” Ziqi said, “E, how do you really understand this, or understand Kun’s good fortune? That is only wine and meat passing through mouth and nose—how can you know where it comes from? I never kept sheep, yet a ewe lambed in the southwest corner of the house; I never loved the hunt, yet quail appeared in the southeast corner. If that is not strange, what is? My son and I wander together—we wander in the midst of Heaven and Earth. With him I invite joy from Heaven and food and clothing from Earth. I do not join him in scheming affairs, in plotting, or in manufacturing oddities. He and I ride upon the genuineness of Heaven and Earth and do not let things disturb or jostle him; we follow nature and do not force what affairs call “fitting.” Now he receives worldly reward. Where there is a strange omen, there has first been strange conduct. Perhaps this is not my son’s fault or mine—could it be Heaven’s gift? That is why I weep.”

Before long, Ziqi sent Kun to the state of Yan. On the road Kun was seized by robbers. They found it hard to sell him intact and easier to sell him if they cut off a foot, so they amputated his foot and sold him in Qi—right in the market where Lord Qu lived. Kun thereafter had meat to eat for the rest of his life until he died.

Nieque met Xu You and asked, “Where are you going?” Xu You said, “I am getting away from Yao.” “Why?” “Yao is so busy practicing benevolence that I fear he will be mocked by all under heaven; later generations may devour one another. The people are not hard to gather: love them and they draw near; give them profit and they come; praise them and they strive; impose on them what they hate and they scatter. Love and profit both spring from benevolence and righteousness. Those who discard benevolence and righteousness are few; those who exploit them are many. The spread of benevolence and righteousness is not sincere—it is seized by the greedy and trumpeted aloud. Therefore to cut the empire to fit one person’s judgment, thinking it benefits the empire, is like judging from a single hurried glance. Yao knows the worthy benefit the empire but does not know the worthy also harm the empire. Only one who stands outside ‘worthiness’ understands this.”

There is the type called nuanshu; there is ruxu; there is juanlou.

Nuanshu: one learns the words of a single teacher, then smugly rejoices in vague self-satisfaction, thinking oneself already sufficient, never knowing one has never truly touched the root of things. Hence the name nuanshu—shallow learning swollen with self-content.

Ruxu: like hog lice. They choose sparse patches of bristles and take them for vast palaces and great parks; they lodge between flank and hoof, in crooked hollows, beside teats and shanks, and think they have safe, convenient homes—never knowing that when the butcher swings his arm, spreads straw, and lights the fire, they will be scorched along with the pig. They advance with that patch of hide and retreat with it. This is ruxu—clinging to a narrow ease.

Juanlou: this refers to Shun. Mutton does not envy ants, but ants envy mutton because it is rank. Shun had this rank, attracting quality in his conduct; the people loved him, so three times he moved and wherever he went towns formed; when he reached the wilds of Deng, a hundred thousand households had gathered. Yao heard Shun was capable and raised him up from barren ground, hoping for the grace his coming would bring. Once Shun was employed from that wasteland, he grew old; sight and hearing failed—yet he could not stop and go home to rest. This is juanlou—drawn and bent by the crowd’s attachment, unable to cease.

The Great Person is one who fills virtue to fullness. When virtue is full, he can stand high without displaying nobility, achieve without claiming merit, enrich the ten thousand things without fixing on their use, cover all under heaven yet have nothing by which to praise himself. The Way of the Great Person is so. Hence it is said: alive without noble rank, dead without posthumous title, not hoarding solid gain, not raising a name—this is called the Great Person. Rank and posthumous title are extras beyond one’s portion; name and fact are empty vessels of the world. Why would the Great Person set his mind on these four? That is why Zhuangzi speaks of “establishing nothing.”

是以神人恶众至众至则不比不比则不利也 神人者言乎其道也神人鼓舞万物而不与圣同忧万物所以自归矣非由好而致之也故曰神人恶众至 故无所甚亲无所甚疎抱德焬和以顺天下此谓真人真人者言其性也真人不与万物相亲疎任于自得而守于纯气岂有逆于天下欤故曰无所甚亲无无所甚疎抱德焬和以顺天下此谓真人真人者言其性也真人不与万物相亲疎任于自得而守于纯气岂有逆于天下欤故曰无所甚亲无所甚疎抱德焬和以顺天下此谓真人然真人不及于神人所以言之于次也 于蚁弃智于鱼得计于羊弃意 于蚁弃智者不知膻以悦慕也于鱼得计者退藏渺以活身也于羊弃意者无心使物来慕也 以目视目以耳听耳以心复心若然者其平也水其直也绳其变也循 以目视目者以明而发不明也以耳听耳者以聪而觉不聪也以心复心者以静而镇不静也如此则其平所以直其变所以正也故曰若然者其平也绳其变也循非真人孰能与于此 古之真人以天待之不以人入天古之真人得之也生失之也死得之也死失之也生药也其实堇也桔梗也鸡壅也豕人以天待之不以人入天古之真人得之也生失之也死得之也死失之也生药也其实堇也桔梗也鸡壅也豕零也是时为帝者也何可胜言
Interpretation

Therefore, the spirit person (shenren) dislikes crowds of people arriving in throngs. When the multitude comes, harmony cannot be achieved; without harmony, there is no benefit.

The spirit person is spoken of in terms of the Dao. The spirit person stirs and transforms the ten thousand things, yet unlike the sage does not worry over them. The ten thousand things return of themselves—it is not that the spirit person, out of fondness, summons them. Hence it is said that the spirit person dislikes the multitude pressing in together.

Thus: nothing is excessively close, nothing is excessively distant; embracing De and nurturing harmonizing qi (yanghe—gently tending harmonizing qi) to accord with the world—this is called the perfected person (zhenren). The perfected person is spoken of in terms of original nature. The perfected person does not divide the ten thousand things into near and far; they let each thing obtain what belongs to it and guard pure unified qi—how could they go against the world? Hence it is said: neither excessively close nor excessively distant, holding De and nurturing harmony to accord with the world—this is the perfected person. Yet the perfected person still falls short of the spirit person, which is why this is placed after the discussion of the spirit person.

“Toward ants, discard cleverness; toward fish, the method is obtained; toward sheep, discard intention”: toward ants, discard cleverness—meaning not using rank, fishy odors to please and draw them; toward fish, the method is obtained—meaning withdrawing into deep, remote places to preserve oneself; toward sheep, discard intention—meaning having no mind that drives external things to come admiring.

Using the eye to turn back upon the eye is using clarity to awaken what is not clear; using the ear to turn back upon the ear is using acuity to perceive what is not acute; using the heart to return to the heart itself is using stillness to settle what is not still. Thus one’s evenness becomes upright thereby, and transformation becomes correct thereby. Hence it is said: such a person is even as water’s surface, upright as a plumb line, transformation following a standard—that is, even and upright as a cord, transformation compliant. Who but a perfected person could achieve this?

The perfected persons of antiquity treated things with what is natural, without mixing in the human where the natural belongs. The perfected persons of antiquity: obtaining was life, losing was death; obtaining could also be death, losing could also be life. Medicinals are the same—there are aconite (jian), platycodon, foxnut (yong), and chuling (polyporus); only at the right time does one become the dominant agent—cases of this sort cannot be exhausted in words.

夫真人者其性内直而不假于物也故任以自然而以待物也不以有为而乱无为也适来所以为时也适去所以能顺也来则必知其暂去也去则必知其暂来也了然明达而始终无累矣故曰古之真人以天待人不以人入天古之真人得之也生失之也死得之也死失之也生 句践也以甲楯三千栖于会稽唯种也能知亡之所以存唯种也不知其身之所以愁故曰鸱目有所适鹤胫有所节解之也悲故曰风之过也死得之也死失之也生 句践也以甲楯三千栖于会稽唯种也能知亡之所以存唯种也不知其身之所以愁故曰鸱目有所适鹤胫有所节解之也悲故曰风之过河也有损焉日之过河也有损焉请只风与日相与守河而河以为未始其撄也恃源而往者也 至人者自知而不知人也自见而不见彼也故祸福吉凶不能为之累矣大夫种者则不然知人而不自知也见彼而不自见也此忧祸足以为之累此庄子所以有鸱目鹤胫之言也 故水之守土也审影之守人也审物之守物也审故目之于明也殆耳之于聪也殆心之于殉也殆凡能其于府也殆殆之成也不给改
Interpretation

The True Person’s inner nature is upright and does not lean on external things. Therefore they entrust everything to nature in dealing with the myriad things, and do not use deliberate action to disturb wuwei (non-action). Coming at the right time is responding to the times; leaving at the right time is being able to follow along. When they come, they know it is only a temporary departure; when they go, they know it is only a temporary arrival. Clear and aware, they are never entangled from beginning to end. Thus it is said: the True Person of old used Heaven to treat people—they did not mix human artifice into Heaven.

King Goujian of Yue once led three thousand men in armor and with shields to hold out on Mount Kuaiji. Only Wen Zhong understood how the state could still be preserved when it was on the verge of ruin, yet did not understand why he himself fell into distress. Therefore it is said: the eyes of the owl each have their proper use, the legs of the crane each have their natural measure—force them apart and the result is pitiable. When wind blows across a river, the river loses water; when the sun passes over the river, it also loses water. If wind and sun together “kept watch” on the river, the river would think they had never disturbed it, because it relies on its source to flow on without ceasing.

The Perfect Person knows themselves but does not go to know others, sees themselves but does not stare at the other party—so fortune and misfortune, auspice and omen, cannot entangle them. Grand Master Wen Zhong was the opposite: he knew others but did not know himself, saw the other party but did not see himself—anxiety and disaster were enough to become a drag on him. When Zhuangzi spoke of the owl’s eyes and the crane’s legs, he meant exactly this.

Water stays secure by holding to earth; shadow stays secure by holding to a person; things stay secure by holding to what they should hold to. Therefore the eyes, in chasing sharp sight, are in danger; the ears, in chasing keen hearing, are in danger; the heart, in outward pursuit and offering the body as sacrifice, is in danger. Whenever any faculty lingers fixed in its own storehouse, there is danger; once danger has formed, there is no time to change it.

水生于土而不离于土也影生于形而不离于形也物出造物而不离造物也故曰水之守土也审影之守人也审物之守物也审然而土无意于水而离于形也物出造物而不离造物也故曰水之守土也审影之守人也审物之守物也审然而土无意于水而水所以亲也形无意于影而影所以生也造物者无意于物而物所以成也三者皆无意于相湏也世俗岂能似之欤故目则必期于明也耳则必期于聪也心则必期于殉也故必期于明则是有意于明也必期于聪则是有意于聪也必期所殉则是有意于殉物也夫有意于聪明所殉则必致危殆之累也岂为相须之道乎故曰目之于明也殆耳之于聪也殆心之于殉也殆 祸之长也兹萃其反也缘功其果也待久而人以为己宝不亦悲乎故有亡国戮民无已不知问是也故足之于地也践虽践恃其所不蹍而后善博也人之知也少虽少恃其所不知而后知天之所谓也 古之至人以多知为召祸之本也虽智而未尝不丧智故祸之所以不能为之累也天下之世俗不能丧智而矜少恃其所不知而后知天之所谓也
Interpretation

Water arises from earth yet cannot leave earth behind; shadow arises from form yet cannot leave form behind; the myriad things emerge from the Creator (the source that transforms and generates all things) yet cannot leave the Creator behind. Thus water stays with earth in secure union, shadow stays with the person in secure union, and things stay with things in secure union. Yet earth has no deliberate intent toward water, and water still draws near; form has no deliberate intent toward shadow, and shadow still appears; the Creator has no deliberate intent toward the myriad things, and the myriad things still come to completion. These three do not rely on one another with deliberate purpose—how could ordinary people manage the same?

The eyes always chase brightness, the ears always chase keen hearing, and the mind always chases external things. Insisting on brightness is deliberately aiming at clarity; insisting on keen hearing is deliberately aiming at acuity; insisting on chasing is deliberately sacrificing oneself for things (she ji zhui wu). Once one deliberately pursues cleverness and chasing, danger and entanglement inevitably follow—how is that the natural way of mutual reliance? Therefore for the eyes, “brightness” is dangerous; for the ears, “keen hearing” is dangerous; for the mind, chasing external things is dangerous.

When calamities pile up ever higher, their turning back stems from craving merit and achievement; the bitter fruit often appears only after a long delay, yet people treat this as their treasure—is that not deeply lamentable? Thus the ruin of states and the killing of people never cease, and still they do not ask into the root cause.

The foot treads the ground; though the place it touches is small, it must rely on the ground not stepped on before it can travel far. Human knowledge, though slight, must rely on what one does not know before one can grasp what Heaven intends to show.

The ultimate persons of antiquity regarded excessive knowledge as the root of calamity. Though they had wisdom, they could always set that wisdom aside, so calamity could not entangle them. The ordinary people under Heaven cannot set wisdom aside; instead they boast of it, not understanding that knowledge is inherently limited and that one must rely on what one does not know in order to know what Heaven means.

古之至人以多知为召祸之本也虽智而未尝不丧智故祸之所以不能为之累也天下之世俗不能丧智而矜其智此祸之所以滋蔓也故曰祸之长也兹萃然祸之所生也伏于福以顺其功由大夫种始能成存越之功也故曰其反也缘功及其为累则固非朝夕之立至由大夫种终不免亡躯之悲也故曰其果也待久此由智之所召也世俗不知而反以智为身之至珍也何其蒙蔽之甚欤此庄子之所以悲也故曰而人以为己宝不亦悲乎 知大一知大阴知大目知大均知大方知大信知大定至矣大一通之大阴解之大目视之大均缘之大方体之大信稽之大定持之 大一者大道也大阴者妙乎 知大一知大阴知大目知大均知大方知大信知大定至矣大一通之大阴解之大目视之大均缘之大方体之大信稽之大定持之 大一者大道也大阴者妙用也大目者至明也大均者常性也大方者常分也大信者不言也大定者不动也大道无物不由而无所不在也故曰通之妙用晦藏而无有不用也故曰解之至明见其所不见而不见其所见故曰视之常性受之各有极而无不顺也故曰缘之常分得之各有限而无有不守也故曰体之不言则无有所期而必至故曰稽之不动无有所易而固执也故曰持之此七者极道之妙也非圣人不能与于此
Interpretation

In antiquity, the perfected person regarded excessive cleverness and cunning as the root of calamity. Though they had wisdom, they could always set that wisdom aside, so calamity could not weigh them down. People in the world cannot set wisdom aside; instead they boast of their cleverness, and calamity therefore grows and spreads. Hence it is said: the increase of calamity is something that accumulates gradually. Where calamity arises, it lurks within good fortune. As for merit, it begins with Grandee Wen Zhong (Yue’s strategist, who helped Goujian preserve Yue)—his talent could achieve the merit of saving the state; hence it is said: when fortune and calamity turn, it is merit that sets it in motion. When merit becomes a burden, that too does not arrive all at once; Grandee Wen Zhong in the end could not escape the grief of losing his life—hence it is said: the outcome takes a long time to appear. All of this is invited by cleverness and cunning. Ordinary people do not understand and instead treat cleverness as their most precious possession—how deep the delusion! This is what Zhuangzi mourned; hence he said: yet people take it as their treasure—is it not pitiable?

To know the Great Unity, the Great Yin, the Great Eye, the Great Equalizer, the Great Square, the Great Trust, and the Great Fixity is to reach the utmost. The Great Unity is used to penetrate; the Great Yin to release; the Great Eye to behold; the Great Equalizer to follow along; the Great Square to embody; the Great Trust to verify arrival; the Great Fixity to hold fast.

The Great Unity is the Great Dao; the Great Yin is subtle efficacy; the Great Eye is the highest clarity; the Great Equalizer is constant nature; the Great Square is constant allotment; the Great Trust is non-speech; the Great Fixity is non-movement. The Great Dao—nothing is not passed through by it, and it is nowhere absent; hence “penetrate it.” Subtle efficacy is hidden and stored yet used in everything; hence “release it.” The highest clarity sees what is usually unseen and does not look at what is usually seen; hence “behold it.” Constant nature—each reception has its limit, yet all follow along; hence “follow it.” Constant allotment—each attainment has its measure, yet all are upheld; hence “embody it.” Non-speech—there is no prior expectation, yet affairs necessarily arrive; hence “verify it.” Non-movement—nothing can alter it; one only holds firm; hence “hold it.” These seven are the utmost subtlety of the Great Dao; only a sage can reach this state.

尽有天循有照冥有枢始有彼则其解之也似不解之者其知之也似不知之也不知而后知道之妙也非圣人不能与于此 尽有天循有照冥有枢始有彼则其解之也似不解之者其知之也似不知之也不知而后知之其问之也不可以有崖而不可以无崖 尽有天者极于自然之妙而无为也循有照者缘于自明之理而反照也冥有枢者晦于运行之徼而不动也始有彼者自泰初之初有之也则其解之也似不解之者识之而归于不识也其知之也似不知之也者知之而归于不知也其问之也不可以有崖者虚而善应而无极也而不可以无崖者应物而不过其极也 颉滑有实古今不代而不可以亏则可不谓有大扬防乎阖不亦问是已奚惑然为 颉滑有实者所谓万物芸芸各归其根也古今不代者无古无今而未尝更变也而不可以亏者不生不化而无不成也 以不惑解惑复于不惑是尚大不惑 无智则无惑有智则有惑道不可而不可以亏者不生不化而无不成也 以不惑解惑复于不惑是尚大不惑 无智则无惑有智则有惑道不可问而问之是惑也不可应而应之是以惑解惑也能无智则不惑也故曰复于不惑复于不惑则无问无应而反于自得也故曰是尚大不惑 南华真经新传卷十二 钦定四库全书 南华真经新传卷十三 宋 王雱 撰 则阳篇
Interpretation

If a person can exhaust what is naturally given, they push everything to the utmost subtlety of nature and themselves do nothing forced; if they can follow the light to illuminate, they rely on the inherent clarity of the mind’s own principle and turn back to reflect on themselves; if they can grasp the pivot in the dark, they remain hidden at the margin where things operate, without rash movement on their own part; if they can see the beginning from “that,” they understand that the myriad things arise from the supreme beginning—that is, the very first opening of the cosmos. Such a person explains things as if not explaining, because knowing still returns to non-clinging; they know as if not knowing, because having knowledge still returns to not-knowing. Only after not-knowing does one truly know—this is the subtlety of the Dao; none but a sage can reach it.

To question this principle, one cannot fix a boundary, because the mind must be empty yet responsive, without end; nor can one say there is no boundary at all, because responding to things must not overstep what is due.

The myriad things are tangled yet each has its real principle—meaning the teeming ten thousand things ultimately return each to its own root; past and present do not replace one another—meaning there is no “ancient” and no “present,” never altered from the start; this truth cannot be diminished—meaning it does not generate anew or change, yet nothing fails to be accomplished. Is this not a broad outline of the claim? Why not simply ask into this principle—why be perplexed about it?

Without cleverness there is no confusion; once cleverness appears, confusion is born. The Dao cannot be questioned; to question is already confusion. It cannot be answered; to answer is to resolve confusion with confusion. Only by dropping cleverness is one free of confusion. Using non-confusion to undo confusion, then returning again to non-confusion—there is neither question nor answer, only a turn back to what one originally had. This alone is to honor the greatest non-confusion.

The above is Volume 12 of the New Commentary on the True Classic of Nanhua. This book is included in the Complete Library in Four Sections as commissioned by the imperial court. Volume 13, “Principles of Yang,” was composed by Wang Peng of the Song dynasty.

夫不能守正性冥至极惑于傥来之物而求进之不止此则阳之所以若是矣庄子因而作则阳篇 则阳游于楚夷节言之于王王未之见夷节归彭阳见王果曰夫子何不谭我于王王果曰我不若公阅休彭阳曰公阅休奚为者邪曰冬则擉鳖于江夏则休乎山樊有过而问者曰此予宅也夫夷节已不能而况我乎吾又不若夷节夫夷节之为人也无德而有知不自许以之神其交固颠冥乎富贵之地非相助以德相助消也夫冻者假衣于春暍者反冬乎冷风也无德而有知不自许以之神其交固颠冥乎富贵之地非相助以德相助消也夫冻者假衣于春暍者反冬乎冷风夫楚王之为人也形尊而严其于罪也无赦如虎非夫佞人正德其孰能挠焉 夫至人者安于性命之情而远于利害之涂见宠而惊闻誉而惧岂有心于富贵利禄乎则阳不能若是而枉己以求进是以王果言公阅休之所以而抑之也夫冬则擉鳖于江者所以顺其天养也夏则休乎山樊者所以全其天乐也天养顺则可欲不能乱天乐全则万物莫能忧岂以宠贵而累心欤此公阅休所为如此矣所谓入于至人之域也 故圣人其穷也使家人忘其贫其达也使王公忘爵禄而化卑其于物也与之为娱矣其于人也乐物之通也保已焉故或不言而饮人以和与人并立而使人化父子之宜彼其乎归居而一间其所施其于人心者若是其远也故曰待公阅休
Interpretation

Those who cannot guard their pure original nature and merge with the supreme ultimate, but instead are misled by chance external things and ceaselessly seek official advancement—that is why Ze Yang (Peng Yang) acted as he did. Zhuangzi therefore wrote the chapter “Ze Yang.”

Ze Yang was traveling in the state of Chu. Yi Jie recommended him to the king of Chu, but the king did not receive him, and Yi Jie returned. Peng Yang saw Wang Guo and said, “Why did you not speak of me before the king?” Wang Guo replied, “I am not equal to Gongyue Xiu.” Peng Yang asked, “What kind of person is Gongyue Xiu?” The answer was: “In winter he spears turtles on the riverbank; in summer he rests at the foot of the hills. When someone passing by asked him, he said: ‘This is where I live.’ If Yi Jie could not manage it, how much less could I? I am not even equal to Yi Jie. Yi Jie is a man without De (Virtue/Power) but with cleverness; he does not claim to transform companionship through spirit, yet he is already sunk in wealth and rank. He does not help others with virtue but helps them to wear themselves down. A person freezing asks spring for clothes; a person suffering heat instead longs for winter’s cold wind. The king of Chu—his bearing is noble and stern; he never pardons faults, like a fierce tiger. Unless one is both eloquent and upright in character, who could turn him around?”

The Perfect Man rests in the natural disposition of nature and life (xingming), keeps far from the path of benefit and harm, is startled when favored, and afraid when he hears praise—how could his heart be tied to wealth, rank, and profit? Ze Yang could not be like this; he humbled himself to seek advancement. That is why Wang Guo spoke of Gongyue Xiu’s conduct to restrain him. Spearing turtles on the river in winter is following heaven’s natural sustenance; resting at the hillside in summer is preserving heaven’s natural ease. When heavenly sustenance is followed, desire cannot disturb; when heavenly joy is complete, nothing in the ten thousand things can grieve him. How could he be dragged by favor and rank? Gongyue Xiu’s way was like this—this is entering the realm of the Perfect Man.

Therefore when the sage is in straits, he can make his household forget poverty; when he is eminent, he can make kings and dukes forget rank and salary and become humble instead. Toward things, he shares their joy; toward people, he delights when affairs go smoothly while still preserving himself. Thus sometimes without speaking he can affect others like harmony that is as if giving someone water to drink; standing shoulder to shoulder with someone, he can transform them. When father and son are in accord, he returns home and dwells at ease, with a calm distance toward all he bestows. His influence on people’s hearts is this profound. Hence it is said: one must wait for Gongyue Xiu.

圣人穷理而尽性乐天而知命其穷也放心于自得之埸而食于不贷之田能使家人内乐而忘贫也其一间其所施其于人心者若是其远也故曰待公阅休 圣人穷理而尽性乐天而知命其穷也放心于自得之埸而食于不贷之田能使家人内乐而忘贫也其达也处于无敌之贵而据于利势之崇能使王公忘己而失高也与物齐谐而其乐所以全故曰其于物也与之为娱矣与人无间而其真所以存故曰其于人也乐物之通而保己焉不言而使人之守纯故曰或不言而饮人以和无人而使人之自化故曰与人并立而使人化叙明分守而不失其所宜故曰父子之宜彼其乎归居闲暇其形而均施其仁惠故曰而一间其所施此圣人为心之若是所以入于寥天也故曰其于人心者若是其远也惟公阅休能之故曰待公阅休 圣人达绸缪周尽一体矣而不知其然性也复命摇作而以天为师人则从而命之也忧乎知而所行恒无几时其有止也若之何生而美者人与之鉴不告则不知其美于人也若知之若不知之若闻知而所行恒无几时其有止也若之何生而美者
Interpretation

The sage exhaustively investigates the principles of things and fully realizes his own nature; he delights in according with Heaven and also knows fate. When poor and constrained, he settles his mind in self-contentment and lives by fields that need no borrowing from others, so that his household inwardly rejoices and forgets poverty. When eminent and successful, he occupies a rank none can match and holds lofty power, yet makes kings and dukes forget themselves and lose their pride. He harmonizes with the ten thousand things as one, and only then is joy preserved—hence it is said that toward things he shares delight with them. He has no barrier with people, and only then is authenticity kept—hence it is said that toward people he delights in mutual connection while preserving himself. Without speaking he can make others hold to simplicity—hence it is said that sometimes by not speaking he lets others drink in harmony. Without opposing others he makes them transform themselves—hence it is said that standing alongside people he transforms them. He clarifies names and duties and does not lose fitting relations—hence it is said that he speaks of what is fitting between father and son. He returns to rest and ease, lets the body be at leisure, and spreads benevolence evenly—hence it is said that he gives in a leisurely, even way. With mind thus, the sage can enter the vast empty Heaven (liao tian)—the realm of the far-reaching, open Way—and is extremely far from the heart of ordinary people. Only Gong Yuexiu (the one in the text who has attained the Way) can do this; hence it is said that one must wait for Gong Yuexiu.

人与

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 3 Vol. 5 →