中文 · EN

《庄子》Vol. 4

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書 Vol. 4 / 4 23,386 characters

About this page. The original text of 《庄子》 Vol. 4 (Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書, 4 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 5 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《庄子》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

曰:「然则谓之有所拂者而所宜,自殉殊面;有所正者有所差,比于大泽,百材皆度;观于大山,木石同坛。此之谓丘里之言。」少知曰:「然则谓之道,足乎?」大公调曰:「不,今物之数,不止于万,而期曰万物者,以数之多者号而读之也。是故天地者,形之大者也;阴阳者,气之大者也;道者为之公。因其大以号而读之则可也,已之矣,乃将得比哉!则若以斯辩,譬犹狗马,其不及远矣。」少知曰:「四之内,六合之里,万物之所生恶起?」大公调曰:「阴阳相照相盖相治,四时相代相生相杀。欲恶去就于是桥起,雌片合于是庸有。安危相易,祸福相生,缓急相?」大公调曰:「阴阳相照相盖相治,四时相代相生相杀。欲恶去就于是桥起,雌片合于是庸有。安危相易,祸福相生,缓急相摩,聚散以成。此名实之可纪,精之可志也。随序之相理,桥运之相使,穷则反,终则始,此物之所有。言之所尽,之所至,极物而已。睹道之人,不随其废,不原其所起,此议之所止。」少知曰:「季真之莫为,接子之或使。二家之议,孰正于其情,孰遍于其理?」大公调曰:「鸡鸣狗吠,是人之所知;虽大知,不能以言读其所自化,又不能以意其所将为。斯接子之或使。二家之议,孰正于其情,孰遍于其理?」大公调曰:「鸡鸣狗吠,是人之所知;虽大知,不能以言读其所自化,又不能以意其所将为。斯而析之,精至于无伦,大至于不可围。或之使,莫之为,免于物而终以为过。或使则实,莫为则虚。有名有实,是物之居;无名无实,在物之虚。可言可意,言而愈。未生不可忌,死不可徂。死生非远也,理不可睹。或之使,莫之为,疑之所假。吾观之本,其往无穷;吾求之末,其来无止。无穷无止,言之无也,与物同理;或使莫为,之本也。与物终始。道不可有,有不可无。道之为名,所假而行。或使莫为,在物一曲,夫胡为于大方?言而足,则终日言而尽道;言而不足,则终日言而物。道物也。与物终始。道不可有,有不可无。道之为名,所假而行。或使莫为,在物一曲,夫胡为于大方?言而足,则终日言而尽道;言而不足,则终日言而物。道物之极,言默不足以载;非言非默,议有所极。」
Interpretation

Little Knowledge asked, “Then does it mean that what goes against one thing may suit another, and that all things each develop in different directions? Where something is upright, something else is crooked. It is like a vast marsh, where all kinds of materials can be found, or a towering mountain, where trees and stones gather together. This is what people in the villages call ordinary sense.”

Little Knowledge asked, “Then is it enough to call this the Dao?”

Grand Duke Tiao replied, “No. The number of things in the world is more than ten thousand. People call them ‘the myriad things’ simply as a way of grouping together what is numerous. Heaven and Earth are the greatest of forms; Yin-Yang, the two kinds of Qi that make up the changes of all things, are the greatest of energies; and the Dao, the fundamental principle that all things follow, is the common principle they share. It is enough to speak of the myriad things by using these greatest names. There is no need to compare them with anything else. To argue in this way is like comparing a dog with a horse: it misses the point entirely.”

Little Knowledge asked, “Where do the myriad things within the four directions of Heaven and Earth come from?”

Grand Duke Tiao replied, “Yin and Yang reflect one another, conceal one another, and come into harmony. The seasons turn in succession, sometimes bringing forth the myriad things and sometimes causing them to decline. Desires and aversions, choosing and rejecting, arise in turn from this. The male and female unite, and the myriad things are born from them. Stability and danger transform into one another; misfortune and good fortune depend on one another; slowness and haste act upon one another; gathering and dispersal together bring about change. These names and actual circumstances can be recorded, and subtle changes can be discerned. The myriad things regulate one another in an ordered way, interweaving, moving, and driving one another onward. When development reaches its limit, things turn back; after ending, they begin again. These are inherent conditions of the myriad things. Words can explain things only up to the point where particular things are exhausted. One who understands the Dao does not follow things into decline or ask where they first arose. Discussion should stop here.”

Little Knowledge asked, “Ji Zhen claims that the myriad things have no master and arise naturally. Jiezi claims that some force drives the myriad things. Which view better fits the facts, and which gives the fuller account of the truth?”

Grand Duke Tiao replied, “Everyone knows the crowing of a rooster and the barking of a dog. Yet even the wisest person cannot explain in words how they change of their own accord, much less predict in advance what they will do. Jiezi’s claim that ‘some force drives them’ cannot explain everything either. If we examine things closely, their subtle aspects cannot be compared, and their vastness cannot be measured. To say that the myriad things are driven by some force, or that they have no master, becomes one-sided if either claim is treated as an absolute conclusion. Saying they are driven makes things seem substantial; saying they have no master makes them seem empty. When name and reality correspond, things exist; when they have neither name nor reality, they are empty.

“Before things come into being, there is nothing to fear; once things have died, they cannot be brought back. Life and death are not far apart, but their inner principle cannot be seen directly. Saying that some force drives things, or that they have no master, is merely a way people speculate. I examine the root of things, and its past has no end; I trace their farthest reaches, and their future has no limit. Beginningless and endless, it cannot be exhausted by words; it connects with the principles of the myriad things. ‘Driven by a force’ and ‘without a master’ are both ways of speaking about the root and beginning and end of the myriad things from a particular perspective.

“The Dao cannot be said to truly exist, nor can it be said to be wholly absent. ‘Dao’ is simply a name people borrow to express its principle. To say that things are driven, or that they have no master, touches only one aspect of the myriad things. How could either account for the boundless Dao? If words could exhaust the principle, then speaking for an entire day would be enough to explain the Dao. If words cannot exhaust the principle, then speaking for an entire day explains only particular things. Neither speech nor silence can fully express the relation between the Dao and the myriad things. It can be conveyed neither by words alone nor by silence alone; discussion has its limits.”

卷九上第二十六外物 外物不可必,故龙逢诛,比干戮,箕子狂,恶来死,桀、纣亡。人主不欲其臣之忠,而忠未必信,故伍员流于江,苌弘死于蜀,藏其血三年而化为碧。人亲不欲其子之孝,而孝未必爱,故孝己忧而曾参悲。木与木相摩则然,金与火相守,藏其血三年而化为碧。人亲不欲其子之孝,而孝未必爱,故孝己忧而曾参悲。木与木相摩则然,金与火相守则,阴阳错行,则天地大骇,于是乎有雷霆,水中有火,乃焚大槐。有甚忧两陷而无所逃。螴蜳不得成,心若县于天地之间,慰暋沈屯,利害相摩,生火甚多,众人焚和,月固不胜火,于是乎有僓而道尽。 庄周家贫,故往贷粟于监河侯。监河侯曰:「诺,我将得邑金,将贷子百金,可乎?」庄周忿然作色曰:「周昨来,有中道而呼者。周顾视车辙中,有鲋鱼焉。周问之曰:『鲋鱼来﹗子何为者耶?』对曰:『我,东海之波臣也。岂有斗升之水而活我哉?』周曰:『诺,我且南游吴越之王,激西江之水而迎子,可乎?』鲋鱼忿然作色曰:『吾失我常与,我无所处。我得斗升之水然活。君乃我且南游吴越之王,激西江之水而迎子,可乎?』鲋鱼忿然作色曰:『吾失我常与,我无所处。我得斗升之水然活。君乃言此,曾不如早索我于枯鱼之肆﹗』」 任公子为大钩巨缁,五十犗以为饵,蹲乎会稽,投竿东海,旦旦而钓,期年不得鱼。已而大鱼食之,牵钩陷,没而下,骛扬而奋鬐,白波若山,海震荡,声侔鬼神,惮赫千里。任公子得若鱼,离而腊之,自制河以东,苍梧已北,莫不厌若鱼者。已而后世辁才说之徒,皆惊而相告也。夫揭竿累,趣灌渎,守鲵鲋,其于得大鱼难矣,饰小说以干县令,其于大达亦远矣,是以未尝闻任氏之风俗,其不可与经于世亦远! 儒以《诗》、《礼》发冢。大儒胪传曰:「东方作矣,事之何若?」未尝闻任氏之风俗,其不可与经于世亦远! 儒以《诗》、《礼》发冢。大儒胪传曰:「东方作矣,事之何若?」小儒:「未解裙襦,口中有珠。」《诗》固有之曰:『青青之麦,生于陵陂。生不布施,何含珠为?』接其鬓,压其顪,儒以金椎控其颐,徐别其颊,无伤口中珠﹗」 老莱子之弟子出薪,遇仲尼,反以告,曰:「有人于彼,修上而趋下,而后耳,视若营四海,不知其谁氏之子。」老莱子曰:「是丘也,召而来。」仲尼至。曰:「丘,去汝躬矜与汝容知,斯为君子矣。」仲尼揖而退,蹙然改容问曰:「业可得进乎?」老莱子曰:「夫不忍一世之伤而骜万世之患,抑固窭邪,亡其略弗及邪?惠以欢为揖而退,蹙然改容问曰:「业可得进乎?」老莱子曰:「夫不忍一世之伤而骜万世之患,抑固窭邪,亡其略弗及邪?惠以欢为骜,终身之丑,中民之行进焉耳,相引以名,相结以。与其誉尧而非桀,不如两忘而闭其所誉。反无非伤也。动无非邪也。圣人踌躇兴事,以每成功。奈何哉其载焉终矜尔!」 宋元君夜半而梦人被发窥阿门,曰:「予自宰路之渊,予为清江使河伯所,渔者余且得予。」元君觉,使人占之,曰:「此神龟也。」君曰:「渔者有余且乎?」左右曰:「有。」君曰:「令余且会朝。」明日,余且朝。君曰:「渔得?」对曰:「且之网得白龟焉,箕圆五尺。」君曰:「献若之龟。」龟至,君再欲杀之,再欲活之,心疑,卜之,曰曰:「渔得?」对曰:「且之网得白龟焉,箕圆五尺。」君曰:「献若之龟。」龟至,君再欲杀之,再欲活之,心疑,卜之,曰:「杀龟以卜吉。」乃刳龟,七十二钻无遗策。仲尼曰:「神龟能见梦于元君,而不能避余且之网;知能七十二钻而无遗策,不能避刳肠之患。如是,则知有所困,神有所不及也。虽有至知,万谋之。鱼不畏网而畏鹈鹕。去小知而大知明,去善而自善矣。婴儿生无石师而能言,与能言者处也。」 惠子谓庄子曰:「子言无用。」庄子曰:「知无用而始可与言用矣。天非不广且大也,人之所用容足耳,然则厕足而垫之致黄泉,人尚有用乎?」惠子曰:「无。」庄子曰:「然则无用之为用也亦明矣。」 庄子曰:「人有能游,且得不游乎?人而不能游,且得游乎?夫流遁之,决绝之,噫,其非至知厚德之任与!覆坠而不反,火驰而不顾。人有能游,且得不游乎?人而不能游,且得游乎?夫流遁之,决绝之,噫,其非至知厚德之任与!覆坠而不反,火驰而不顾。虽相与为君臣,时也,易而无以相贱。故曰:至人不留行焉。夫尊古而卑今,学者之流也。且以狶韦氏之流观今之世,夫孰能不波,唯至人乃能游于世而不僻,顺人而不失己。彼教学,承意不彼。 目彻为明,耳彻为聪,鼻彻为颤,口彻为甘,心彻为知,知彻为德。道不欲壅,壅则哽,哽而不止则跈,跈则众害生。物之有知者恃息,其不殷,非天之罪。天之穿之,日夜无降,人则顾塞其窦。胞有重阆,心有天游,室无虚,则妇姑勃溪;心无天游,则六凿相攘。大林丘山之善于人也,亦神者不胜。德溢乎名,名溢乎暴,谋稽乎誸,知出乎争,柴生乎守官,事果乎众宜。春雨时,草木怒生,铫耨于是乎始修,草木之倒植者过半而不知其然。 静默可以补病,眦搣可以时,草木怒生,铫耨于是乎始修,草木之倒植者过半而不知其然。 静默可以补病,眦搣可以休老,宁可以止遽。虽然,若是,劳者之务,佚者之所未尝过而问焉。圣人之所以駴天下,神人未尝过而问焉;贤人所以駴世,圣人未尝过而问焉;君子所以駴国,贤人未尝过而问焉;小人所以合时,子未尝过而问焉。演门有亲死者,以善毁爵为官师,其党人毁而死者半。尧与许由天下,许由逃之;汤与务光,务光怒之;纪他闻之,帅弟子而踆于窾水,侯吊之。三年,申徒狄因以踣河。 荃者所以在鱼,得鱼而忘荃;蹄者所以在兔,得兔而忘蹄;言者所以意,得意而忘吊之。三年,申徒狄因以踣河。 荃者所以在鱼,得鱼而忘荃;蹄者所以在兔,得兔而忘蹄;言者所以意,得意而忘言。吾安得夫忘言之人而与之言哉!」
Interpretation

External things are difficult for people to control and command. Thus Guan Longfeng was killed, Bi Gan was executed, Jizi went mad, E Lai lost his life, and Jie of Xia and Zhou of Shang were destroyed. A ruler may not want his ministers to be loyal, and even when they are loyal, they may not be trusted. So Wu Zixu was forced to throw himself into the river, and Chang Hong died in Shu. His blood was kept for three years and later turned into green jade. Parents may not always want their sons to be filial; even when a son is dutiful, he may not be loved. So Xiaoji was troubled with grief, and Zeng Shen was sorrowful.

When pieces of wood rub against each other, they catch fire; when metal meets fire, it too is damaged. When the movements of Yin and Yang fall into disorder, Heaven and Earth are shaken, and thunder and lightning arise. Fire even appeared in water and burned a great locust tree. Those burdened by deep distress are caught between two impossible choices, unable to escape. Their minds waver, as if suspended between Heaven and Earth, weighed down by gloom. As benefits and harms clash without cease, countless fires of anxiety kindle in the heart, and people thereby wear away their inner calm. The moon cannot hold back the flames forever. Then all things wither, and the Way of life reaches its end.

Zhuang Zhou was poor, so he went to ask the Marquis of Jianhe for grain. The marquis said, “All right. Once I receive the taxes from my fief, I’ll lend you a hundred pieces of gold. Will that do?” Zhuang Zhou’s expression changed. He said, “Yesterday, as I was coming here, I heard someone calling for help along the road. I looked back and saw a crucian carp in a wheel rut. I asked it, ‘Crucian carp, what has happened to you?’ It replied, ‘I am an official of the Eastern Sea. Now I am nearly dried up and dying. Could you give me a dipper or half a sheng of water to save my life?’ I said, ‘All right. I’ll go south and persuade the rulers of Wu and Yue to send the waters of the Western River to meet you. Will that do?’ The carp grew angry and said, ‘I have lost the water I need to live and have nowhere to dwell. A little water would be enough to keep me alive. What you say is of no use. You might as well go look for me at the dried-fish shop!’”

Lord Ren made an enormous fishhook and fitted it with a thick black line. He used fifty castrated oxen as bait, crouched on Mount Kuaiji, and cast his line into the Eastern Sea. He fished day after day, but for a whole year caught nothing. Then a great fish swallowed the bait, pulled the hook down into the depths, and suddenly leapt up, thrashing its tail with all its strength. It raised white waves like mountains and shook the sea; its power was like that of spirits and gods, and the waters thundered for a thousand miles. After Lord Ren caught the fish, he cut it open and dried it. East of the Zhi River and north of Cangwu, there was no one who had not eaten some. Later, people of shallow learning and narrow experience heard of this and passed the story around in astonishment. Those who fish for little fry in ditches with slender bamboo rods and fine lines—how could they ever catch a great fish? Those who seek high office by flaunting shallow arguments are far from understanding the Great Way. They have never heard of Lord Ren’s breadth of vision and way of acting, so naturally they are ill-equipped to govern the world.

Confucian scholars use the Book of Songs and the Book of Rites to rob tombs. The senior scholar sends word from the front: “Dawn is near. How is it going?” The junior scholar replies, “I haven’t yet undone the dead man’s clothes, but there is a pearl in his mouth.” The senior scholar then recites a line from the Book of Songs: “Green, green, the wheat grows on the hillside. He would not give when alive; what use is a pearl in his mouth now that he is dead?” Then he grabs the corpse by the hair and pins down its beard, while the scholars use a gold hammer to pry open its jaw. They slowly part the cheeks, taking care not to damage the pearl in its mouth.

A disciple of Lao Laizi went out to gather firewood and encountered Confucius. When he returned, he reported, “There’s a man over there with a long upper body and short legs. His ears stick out behind him, and his eyes seem to scan in every direction. I don’t know whose son he is.” Lao Laizi said, “That is Kong Qiu. Ask him to come here.” When Confucius arrived, Lao Laizi said, “Kong Qiu, rid yourself of your self-importance and your show of cleverness. Only then can you be called a gentleman.” Confucius bowed and withdrew. With a solemn expression, he asked, “Can my learning still make progress?”

Lao Laizi said, “You cannot bear a setback that lasts only a moment, yet arrogantly invite calamities that last a long time. Is this because you are naturally shallow, or because you lack foresight? You guide people with kindness and delight, yet take pride in doing so; you will carry shame for the rest of your life. Ordinary people do no more than strive to get ahead, build up one another’s reputations, and form alliances for profit. Rather than praise Yao and condemn Jie, forget both kinds of judgment and cease clinging to praise. Return to your natural authenticity, and you will not be harmed. Act, and you will not repeatedly go against the Way. The sage acts with ease, seeking only to bring things to completion. Why are you always burdened with self-importance and pride?”

One night, Song Yuanjun dreamed of a man with disheveled hair who peered through the small side gate beside the palace entrance. The man said, “I come from the deep pool of Zailu. I am an emissary of the Qing River and was on my way to see the River Earl, but a fisherman named Yu Qie caught me.” When Yuanjun woke, he had the dream interpreted. The diviner said, “It was a divine turtle.” Yuanjun asked those around him, “Is there a fisherman named Yu Qie?” They replied, “There is.” Yuanjun then ordered Yu Qie to appear before him at court the next morning.

When Yu Qie appeared, Yuanjun asked him, “What have you caught?” Yu Qie replied, “My net caught a white turtle. Its shell is about five feet across.” Yuanjun ordered him to present the turtle. When it was brought in, Yuanjun considered killing it, then considered setting it free. Unable to decide, he had the turtle consulted by divination. The verdict read, “Kill the turtle to divine good or ill fortune.” Yuanjun cut open its belly and used it for divinations seventy-two times. Every one proved accurate; not once did it fail.

Confucius commented, “The divine turtle could send a dream to Yuanjun, yet it could not escape Yu Qie’s net. It could make all seventy-two divinations come true, yet it could not avoid the calamity of being cut open. So even wisdom has its limits, and even supernatural skill has things beyond its reach. However great one’s intelligence, it is difficult to reckon with everything. Fish do not fear nets, but they fear ospreys. Set aside petty cleverness, and great wisdom will become clear; set aside goodness put on display, and true goodness will appear. An infant can speak without a teacher because it lives among people who can speak.”

Huizi said to Zhuangzi, “Your words are useless.” Zhuangzi replied, “Only someone who understands what is useless can talk with you about what is useful. The earth is vast and boundless, yet all a person actually uses is the small patch beneath the soles of the feet. If the rest of the ground were dug away, all the way down to the Yellow Springs, would that patch still be useful to the person standing on it?” Huizi said, “No.” Zhuangzi said, “Then the use of what is useless is clear.”

Zhuangzi said, “If someone has the ability to wander freely among the affairs of the world, can they not wander freely? If they lack this ability, can they wander freely all the same? To let desires run wild and break with all restraint—is that a burden for those of the highest wisdom and deepest De? Once they fall, they do not turn back; they charge on like a burning chariot, heedless of the consequences. If someone can wander freely, can they not wander freely? If they lack this ability, can they wander freely all the same? The fact that one person becomes a ruler and another a subject is simply the result of circumstances. When their positions change, there is no need for them to look down on each other. Thus the Perfected Person is not bound by fixed patterns of conduct.”

Revering antiquity and looking down on the present is a habit among some scholars. Even if we used the age of ancient peoples such as the Xiwei to examine the present, who could remain entirely untouched by the world’s fluctuations? Only the Perfected Person can move through the world without becoming trapped in partial views, responding to others without losing themselves. Those who follow doctrines rigidly and cater to other people’s wishes do not thereby come to understand the Dao.

When the eyes are clear, that is called vision; when the ears are clear, that is called hearing; when the nose is clear, it can distinguish scents; when the mouth is clear, it can taste; when the heart-mind is clear, it can know; when knowing is clear, it becomes De. The Dao must not be obstructed: when obstructed, it cannot flow. If it cannot flow and be released, it will be trampled, and all kinds of harm will arise. Living things depend on breath; when their breath is not abundant, Heaven is not to blame. The transformations of Heaven and Earth proceed day and night without stopping, yet people often block the openings of their own bodies. The abdomen should be spacious, and the mind should have room to move freely. When a house has no empty space, a mother-in-law and daughter-in-law quarrel; when the mind has no space to wander freely, the senses struggle with one another.

Great forests and mountain landscapes benefit people, yet cannot equal the nourishment found within the spirit. When one’s De exceeds one’s reputation, reputation becomes self-display. When plans gather around urgent matters, knowledge arises from contention. Clinging to one’s post brings obstruction, while action is governed by standards that everyone accepts. When spring rain falls at the right time, plants and trees flourish, and only then do people begin to repair their hoes and farm tools. Yet more than half the plants are planted upside down, and people do not know why.

Silence and few words can help restore an ailing body; massaging the eye sockets can ease old age; stillness can quell agitation. These things are useful, but they are needed only by those who toil; those who live at ease have never thought to ask about them. The principles with which the sage alerts the world are of no particular concern to the spirit person. The principles with which the worthy person alerts the world are of no concern to the sage. The principles with which the gentleman alerts a state are of no concern to the worthy person. And the methods by which petty people accommodate themselves to the times may not be ones you truly understand.

A man in Yanmen grieved excessively over the death of a relative. He was granted rank and office and became an official. People in his community imitated him, wounding their own bodies, and half of them died. When Yao ceded the empire to Xu You, Xu You fled. When Tang offered the empire to Wuguang, Wuguang grew angry. Jita heard of this and took his disciples into hiding by the banks of the Kuan River. Hou went to console him. Three years later, Shentu Di also threw himself into the river over the matter.

A bamboo fish trap is for catching fish; once the fish are caught, the trap can be forgotten. A snare is for catching rabbits; once the rabbits are caught, the snare can be forgotten. Words are for expressing meaning; once the meaning is understood, the words can be forgotten. Where can I find someone who has forgotten words, so I can talk with them?

卷九上第二十七寓言 寓言十九,重言十七,卮言日出,和以天倪。寓言十九,藉外论之。亲父不为其子媒。亲父誉之,不若非其父者也;非罪也,人之罪也。与己同则应,不与己同则反;同于己为是之,异于己为非之。重言十七,所以己言也。是为耆艾,年先矣,而无经纬本末以期年耆者,是非也。人而无以先人,无人道也;人而无人道,是之谓陈人。卮言日出,和以天倪,因以曼衍,所以穷年。不言则齐,齐与言不齐,言与齐不齐也。故曰道也;人而无人道,是之谓陈人。卮言日出,和以天倪,因以曼衍,所以穷年。不言则齐,齐与言不齐,言与齐不齐也。故曰:「无。」言无言,终身言,未尝不言;终身不言,未尝不言。有自也而可,有自也而不;有自也而然,有自也而不然。恶乎然?然于然;恶乎不然?不然于不然。恶乎?可于可;恶乎不可?不可于不可。物固有所然,物固有所可。无物不然,无物可。非卮言日出,和以天倪,孰得其久!万物皆种也,以不同形相禅,始卒若环,得其伦,是谓天均。天均者,天倪也。 庄子谓惠子曰:「孔子行年六十而六十化。始时所是,卒而非之,未知之所谓是之非五十九非也。」惠子曰:「孔子勤志服知也。」庄子曰:「孔子谢之矣,其未之尝言。孔子云:『夫受才乎大本,复灵以生。鸣而当律,言而当法。利义陈前,而好恶是非直服人之口而已矣。使人乃以心服,而之矣,其未之尝言。孔子云:『夫受才乎大本,复灵以生。鸣而当律,言而当法。利义陈前,而好恶是非直服人之口而已矣。使人乃以心服,而不敢蘁,立定天下之定。乎,已乎!吾且不得及彼乎!」 曾子再仕而心再化,曰:「吾及亲仕,三釜而心乐;后仕,三千锺不洎,心悲。」弟子问于仲尼曰:「若参者,可谓无所县其罪乎?」曰:既已县矣!夫无所县者,可以有哀乎?彼视三釜、三千锺,如观雀蚊虻相过乎前也。」 颜成子游谓东郭子綦曰:「自吾闻子之言,一年而野,二年而从,三年通,四年而物,五年而来,六年而鬼入,七年而天成,八年而不知死、不知生,九年大妙。 生有为,死也亏。公以其死也,有自也;而生阳也,无自也。而果然?乎其所适?恶乎其所不适?天有历数,地有人据,吾恶乎求之?莫知其所终,若之何其无命也?莫知其所始,若之何其有命也?有果然?乎其所适?恶乎其所不适?天有历数,地有人据,吾恶乎求之?莫知其所终,若之何其无命也?莫知其所始,若之何其有命也?有以相应也,若之何其无鬼?无以相应也,若之何其有鬼邪?」 众罔两问于景曰:「若向也俯而今也仰,向也括而今也被发;向也坐而今也起,向也行而今也止,何也?」景曰:搜搜也,奚稍问也!予有而不知其所以。予,蜩甲也,蛇蜕也,似之而非也。火与日,吾屯也;阴与夜,吾代也。彼吾所以有待邪?而况乎以有待者乎!彼则我与之来,彼往则我与之往,彼强阳则我与之强阳。强阳者,又何以有问乎!」 阳子居南之沛,老聃西游于秦,邀于郊,至于与之往,彼强阳则我与之强阳。强阳者,又何以有问乎!」 阳子居南之沛,老聃西游于秦,邀于郊,至于梁而遇老子。老子中道天而叹曰:「始以汝为可教,今不可也。」阳子居不答。至舍,进盥漱巾栉,脱屦户外,膝行而前,曰:「向者弟子欲请夫子,夫子行不闲,是以不敢。今矣,请问其故。」老子曰:「而雎雎盱盱,而谁与居?大白若辱,盛德若不足。」阳子居蹴然变容曰:「敬闻命矣!」其往也,舍者迎将,其家公执席,妻执巾,舍者避席,炀者避灶。其反也,舍者与之争席矣!
Interpretation

“Parables” make up nineteen parts, “quoted sayings” seventeen, while “goblet words”—speech that pours out and adapts freely, like wine from a cup tilted toward whatever is at hand—arise naturally without end and are harmonized by “Heaven’s dividing line,” the natural distinctions and balance among all things. A parable expresses a principle through someone else’s story. A father is not the right person to find a match for his own son: praise from an outsider is more convincing than a father’s praise. This is not because the father is at fault, but because human feelings work this way. People tend to agree with opinions like their own and oppose those that differ; they take whatever suits their wishes to be right and whatever does not to be wrong.

“Quoted sayings” convey one’s meaning through the words of someone older or more respected. Being old does not mean having true experience. If someone has lived many years but cannot see how things fit together or grasp their course from beginning to end, that person is not truly an elder. Anyone with nothing to teach others falls short of what human relationships require; such a person is merely old in years.

Goblet words arise in response to circumstances and harmonize different accounts through natural distinctions. They unfold as things change, and so can carry on throughout a lifetime. When nothing is said, all things seem to be one and the same. Once words are spoken, however, this oneness and speech are no longer the same, and words can never be fully identical with things themselves. Thus the Dao is difficult to put into words. Whoever does not understand the way human beings and all things connect is merely old in years.

“Not speaking” does not mean never opening one’s mouth in a lifetime. A person may speak all their life without ever truly speaking of the Dao; another may remain silent all their life and still have expressed something. Things each have their own grounds, so some are judged acceptable and others unacceptable; some are judged to be this way and others not to be this way. Why is something judged to be this way? Because by one standard it is said to be so. Why is it judged not to be this way? Because by another standard it is said not to be so. What counts as acceptable or unacceptable is also judged according to each person’s own standards. Things each have their own reasons for being as they are and their own qualities to value. Nothing is absolutely not so, and nothing is absolutely unworthy. Unless goblet words are allowed to flow freely and be harmonized by Heaven’s dividing line, who could sustain them for long?

All things are made up of differing forms, which follow and replace one another as they change. Their beginnings and endings circle round like a ring. To grasp the order within this process is called “Heaven’s balance,” the natural equilibrium of all things. Heaven’s balance is Heaven’s dividing line.

Zhuangzi said to Huizi, “Confucius reached the age of sixty and underwent sixty changes. What he once considered right, he later considered wrong. Does that mean that everything he judged right before his fifty-ninth change must have been wrong?” Huizi said, “Confucius was diligent in his pursuit of knowledge.” Zhuangzi said, “Confucius has already let go of that attachment. He once said: ‘A person’s natural endowment comes from the root of all things, and their spirit returns with the course of life. Birdsong accords with its pitch; speech accords with its rules. When profit and righteousness stand before us, people’s likes and dislikes, their judgments of right and wrong, often amount to making them agree only with their mouths. If we can bring people to believe with their hearts, so that they dare not resist, and thereby establish a standard accepted by all under Heaven, that is enough! Ah, I fear I still have not reached such a state.’”

Zengzi held office twice, and his state of mind changed each time. He said, “When I held office while my parents were still alive, my salary was only three fu, yet I was happy. Later, I held office with a salary of three thousand zhong, but my parents were gone, and I felt grief.” A disciple asked Confucius, “Could someone like Zeng Shen be said to have no concerns or attachments?” Confucius said, “He still had concerns. Would someone truly free of attachment feel such grief? He would look at three fu and three thousand zhong as if sparrows, mosquitoes, and gnats were flying past his eyes, and would not be moved by them.”

Yan Cheng Ziyou said to Dongguo Ziqi, “After hearing your words, in the first year I became simple and unadorned; in the second, I learned to go along with things; in the third, I became open and perceptive; in the fourth, I felt that all things were connected; in the fifth, my mind found a place to rest; in the sixth, the principles of ghosts and spirits seemed to enter my heart; in the seventh, I followed nature; in the eighth, I no longer clung to life and death; and in the ninth, I reached a wondrous state.”

Life means taking action; death is like a loss in the force of life. If death has its cause, then surely the Yang Qi that gives rise to life has a cause too. Where, in the end, do things return? Where can they not return? Heaven has its courses, and human affairs unfold on earth. Where, then, can we go to seek an answer? If we do not know where life finally leads, how can we claim that there is no destiny? If we do not know where life begins, how can we claim that everything is determined by destiny? If things truly respond to one another, how can we claim that ghosts and spirits do not exist? If they do not respond to one another, how can we claim that ghosts and spirits do exist?

A multitude of shadow-edges, faint shadows cast at the margins of a shadow, asked the shadow, “A moment ago you were bent over, and now you are standing straight; a moment ago your hair was tied up, and now it hangs loose; a moment ago you were sitting, and now you have stood up; a moment ago you were walking, and now you have stopped. Why?” The shadow said, “I change suddenly like this. Why insist on asking? These changes happen to me, but I do not know their cause. I am like a cicada’s cast-off shell or a snake’s shed skin: I seem to be myself, yet I am no longer the self I was before. When fire and the sun shine on me, I appear; when darkness and night arrive, I disappear. Do I not depend on other things in order to appear? And what of the things that depend on me in order to appear? When other things come, I come along with them; when they go, I go too. When they move, I move with them. Since everything is in motion and change, why insist on asking?”

Yangzi Ju was traveling south to Pei, while Lao Dan was heading west to Qin. They met outside the city and traveled together to Liang. Partway along the road, Laozi looked up at the sky and sighed. “At first I thought you could be taught,” he said. “Now it seems you cannot.” Yangzi Ju made no reply. When they arrived at their lodging, he brought water for washing and rinsing, a towel, and a comb. He left his shoes outside the door, then approached Laozi on his knees and said, “Earlier I wanted to ask you something, Master, but you were hurrying along and had no free time, so I did not dare speak. Now I would like to ask why you said that.”

Laozi said, “All along the road you were so proud and self-satisfied. Who would want to be around you? What is truly pure looks as though it has a stain; a person of deep De seems to have something lacking.” Hearing this, Yangzi Ju looked respectful and said, “I will follow your teaching.”

Earlier, when Yangzi Ju arrived at an inn, the other guests welcomed him, the host personally arranged a place for him, his wife brought him a towel, those already seated gave up their places, and the person tending the fire moved away from the hearth. After hearing Laozi’s words and returning, the guests competed with him for places to sit.

卷九下第二十八让王 尧以天下让许由,许由不受。又让于子州支父,子州之父曰:「以我为,犹之可也。虽然,我适有幽忧之病,方且治之,未暇治由,许由不受。又让于子州支父,子州之父曰:「以我为,犹之可也。虽然,我适有幽忧之病,方且治之,未暇治天下也。」夫天下至重也,不以害其生,又况他物乎!唯无以天下为者,可以托天下也。 舜让天下于子州之伯,子州之伯曰:「予适有幽忧之病,方且治之,未天下也。」故天下大器也,而不以易生。此有道者之所以异乎俗者也。 舜以天下让善卷,善卷曰:「余立于宇宙之中,冬日衣皮毛,夏日衣葛;春耕种,形足以劳动;秋收敛,身足以休食;日出而作,日入而息,逍遥天地间而心意自得。吾何以天下为哉!悲夫,子之不知余也。」遂不受。于是去而入深山,其处。 舜以天下让其友石户之农。石户之农曰:「卷卷乎,后之为人,葆力之也。」以舜之德为未至也。于是夫负妻戴,携子以入于海,终身不反也。 大王亶父居邠,狄人攻之。事之以皮帛而不受,事之之为人,葆力之也。」以舜之德为未至也。于是夫负妻戴,携子以入于海,终身不反也。 大王亶父居邠,狄人攻之。事之以皮帛而不受,事之以犬马而不受,以珠玉而不受。狄人之所求者土地也。大王亶父曰:「与人之兄居而杀其弟,与人之父杀其子,吾不忍也。子皆勉居矣!为吾臣与为狄人臣奚以异!且吾闻之,不以养害所养。」因杖策而去之。民相连而从之。遂成国于岐山之下。夫大王亶父,能尊生矣。能尊生者,虽贵富不以养伤身,虽贫贱不以利累形。今世之人居高官者,皆重失之。见利轻亡其身,岂不惑哉! 越人三世弒其君,王子搜患之,逃乎丹穴。而越国无君,求王子搜不,从之丹穴。王子搜不肯出,越人熏以艾。乘以王舆。王子搜援绥登车,仰越人三世弒其君,王子搜患之,逃乎丹穴。而越国无君,求王子搜不,从之丹穴。王子搜不肯出,越人熏以艾。乘以王舆。王子搜援绥登车,仰天呼曰:「君乎!君乎!独不可以舍我乎!」王子搜非恶为君也,恶为君之患也。若王子搜,谓不以国伤生矣,此固越人之所欲得为君也。 韩魏相与争侵地。子华子见昭僖侯,昭僖侯有忧色。子华子曰:「今使天下书铭于君之前,书之言曰:左手攫之则右手废,右手攫之则左手废。然而攫之者必有天下。』君能攫之乎?」昭僖侯曰:「寡人不攫也。」子华子曰:甚善!自是观之,两臂重于天下也,身亦重于两臂。韩之轻于天下亦远矣,今之所争者,其轻于又远。君固愁身伤生以忧戚不得也!」僖侯曰:「善哉!教寡人者众矣,未尝得闻于天下亦远矣,今之所争者,其轻于又远。君固愁身伤生以忧戚不得也!」僖侯曰:「善哉!教寡人者众矣,未尝得闻此也。」子华子谓知轻重矣。 鲁君闻颜阖得道之人也,使人以币先焉。颜阖守陋闾,苴布之衣而自牛。鲁君之使者至,颜阖自对之。使者曰:「此颜阖之家与?」颜阖对曰:「此阖之家也。」使者致币,颜阖对曰:「恐听谬而遗使者罪,不若审之。」使者,反审之,复来求之,则不得已。故若颜阖者,真恶富贵也。 故曰:道之真以治身,其绪余以为国家,其土苴以治天下。由此观之,王之功,圣人之余事也,非所以完身养生也。今世俗之君子,多危身弃生以殉物,岂悲,其绪余以为国家,其土苴以治天下。由此观之,王之功,圣人之余事也,非所以完身养生也。今世俗之君子,多危身弃生以殉物,岂悲哉!凡圣人之动作也,必察其所以之与其所以为。今且有人于此,以随侯之珠,千仞之雀,世必笑之。是何也?则其所用者重而所要者轻也。夫生者,岂特随侯之哉! 子列子穷,容貌有饥色。客有言之于郑子阳者,曰:「列御寇,盖有道之士也,居之国而穷,君无乃为不好士乎?」郑子阳即令官遗之粟。子列子见使者,再拜而辞。使者去,子列子入,其妻望之而拊心曰:「妾闻为有道者之子,皆得佚乐,有饥色。君过而遗先生食,先子入,其妻望之而拊心曰:「妾闻为有道者之子,皆得佚乐,有饥色。君过而遗先生食,先生不受,岂不命邪。」子列子笑,谓之曰︰「君知我也。以人之言而遗我粟,至其罪我也,又且以人之言,此吾所以不受也。」,民果作难而杀子阳。 楚昭王失国,屠羊说走而从于昭王。昭王反国,将赏从者。及屠羊说。羊说曰:「大王失国,说失屠羊;大王反国,说亦反屠羊。臣之爵禄已复矣,又何赏之!」王曰:「强之!」屠羊说曰:「大王失国,非臣之罪,故不敢伏其诛;大王反,非臣之功,故不敢当其赏。」王曰:「见之。」屠羊说曰:「楚国之法,必有重大功而后得见。今臣之知不足以存国,而勇不足以死寇。吴军入郢,说畏难而避,非故随大王也。今大王欲废法毁约见说,此非臣之所以闻于天下也。」王谓司马子綦曰:「屠羊说居处卑贱而陈义甚高,子綦为我延之以三旌之位。」毁约见说,此非臣之所以闻于天下也。」王谓司马子綦曰:「屠羊说居处卑贱而陈义甚高,子綦为我延之以三旌之位。」屠羊曰:「夫三旌之位,吾知其贵于屠羊之肆也;万锺之禄,吾知其富于屠羊之利也;然岂可贪爵禄而使吾君有妄施之名乎!说不敢当,愿复反吾屠羊之肆。」遂不受也。 原宪居鲁,环堵之室,茨以生草;蓬户不完,桑以为枢;而瓮牖二室,以为塞;上漏下湿,匡坐而弦。子贡乘大马,中绀而表素,轩车不容巷,往见原宪。宪华冠縰履,杖藜而应门。子贡曰:「嘻!先生何病?」原宪应之曰:「宪闻之,无谓之贫,学而不能行谓之病。今宪,贫也,非病也。」子贡逡巡而有愧色。原宪曰:「夫希而行,比周而友,学以为人,教以为己,仁义之慝,舆马之饰,宪不忍为也。」 曾子居卫,缊袍无表,颜色肿哙也。」子贡逡巡而有愧色。原宪曰:「夫希而行,比周而友,学以为人,教以为己,仁义之慝,舆马之饰,宪不忍为也。」 曾子居卫,缊袍无表,颜色肿哙,手足胼胝,三日不举火,十年不制。冠而缨绝,捉衿而肘见,纳屦而踵决。曳纵而歌《商颂》,声满天地,若出金石。天子不得臣,诸侯不得友。故养志者忘形,养形者忘利,致道者忘心矣。 孔子谓颜回曰:「回,来!家贫居卑,胡不仕乎?」颜回对曰:「不愿仕。回有郭之田五十亩,足以给饘粥;郭内之田十亩,足以为丝麻;鼓琴足以自娱;所学夫子之道者足以自乐也。回不愿仕。」孔子愀然变容,曰:「善哉,回之意!闻之,『郭内之田十亩,足以为丝麻;鼓琴足以自娱;所学夫子之道者足以自乐也。回不愿仕。」孔子愀然变容,曰:「善哉,回之意!闻之,『知足者,不以利自累也;审自得者,失之而不惧;行修内者,无位而不怍。』丘诵之久矣,今于回而后见之,是丘之得也。」 中山公子牟谓瞻子曰:「身在江海之上,心居乎魏阙之下,奈何?」瞻:「重生。重生则利轻。」中山公子牟曰:「虽知之,未能自胜也。」瞻子曰:「不自胜则从,神无恶乎?不能自胜而强不从者,此之谓重伤。重伤之人,无寿类矣!」牟,万乘之公子也,其隐岩穴也,难为于布衣之士;虽未至乎道,可谓其意矣。 孔子穷于陈蔡之间,七日不火食,藜羹不糁,颜色甚惫,而弦歌于室。择菜,子路、子贡相与言曰:「夫子再逐于鲁,削迹于卫,伐树于宋,穷于商周,围蔡。杀夫子者无罪,藉夫子者无禁。弦歌鼓琴,未子再逐于鲁,削迹于卫,伐树于宋,穷于商周,围蔡。杀夫子者无罪,藉夫子者无禁。弦歌鼓琴,未尝绝音,君子之无耻也若此乎?」颜回无以应,入告孔子。孔子推琴,喟然而叹曰:「由与赐,细人也。而来,吾语之。」子路、子贡入。子路曰:「如此者,可谓穷矣!」孔子曰:是何言也!君子通于道之谓通,穷于道之谓穷。今丘抱仁义之道以遭乱世之患,其何穷之为﹗内省而不穷于道,临难而不失其德。天寒既至,霜雪既降,吾是以知松柏之茂也。蔡之隘,于丘其幸乎。」孔子削然反琴而弦歌,子路扢然执而舞。子贡曰:「吾不知天之高也,地之下也。」古之得道者,穷亦乐,通亦乐,所乐非穷通也。道德于此,则穷通为寒暑风雨之序矣。故许由虞于舞。子贡曰:「吾不知天之高也,地之下也。」古之得道者,穷亦乐,通亦乐,所乐非穷通也。道德于此,则穷通为寒暑风雨之序矣。故许由虞于颖阳,共伯得乎共首。 舜以天下让其友北人无择,北人无择曰:「异哉,后之为人也,居于畎之中,而游尧之门﹗不若是而已,又欲以其辱行漫我,吾羞见之。」因自投清泠之渊。 汤将伐桀,因卞随而谋,卞随曰:「非吾事也。」汤曰:「孰可?」曰︰吾不知也。」汤又因瞀光而谋,瞀光曰:「非吾事也。」汤曰︰「孰可?」曰:「吾知也。」汤曰:「可?」曰︰吾不知也。」汤又因瞀光而谋,瞀光曰:「非吾事也。」汤曰︰「孰可?」曰:「吾知也。」汤曰:「伊尹何如?」曰:「强力忍垢,吾不知其它也。」遂与伊尹谋伐桀,克之,以让卞随。卞随辞曰:「后之伐桀也谋乎我,必以我为贼也;胜桀而让我,必以我为贪也。吾生乎乱世,而无道之人再来漫我以其行,吾不忍数闻也!」乃自投椆水而死。汤又让瞀光,曰:「知者谋之,武者遂之,仁者居之,古之道也。吾子胡不立乎?」瞀光辞曰:「废上,非义也;民,非仁也;人犯其难,我享其利,非廉也。吾闻之曰:『非其义者,不受其禄;无道之世,不践其土。』况尊我乎!吾不忍久见也。」乃负石而自沈于庐。 昔周之兴,有士二人处于孤竹,曰伯夷、叔齐。二人相谓曰:「吾闻西有人,似有道者,试往观焉。」至于岐阳,武王闻之,使,曰伯夷、叔齐。二人相谓曰:「吾闻西有人,似有道者,试往观焉。」至于岐阳,武王闻之,使叔旦往见之。与之盟曰:「加富二等,就官一列。」血牲而埋之。二人相视而笑,曰:「嘻,异哉!吾所谓道也。昔者神农之有天下也,时祀尽敬而不祈喜;其于人也,忠信尽治而无求焉。乐为政,乐与治为治。不以人之坏自成也,不以人之卑自高也,不以遭时自利也。今周见殷之乱而遽为政,上谋而下行货,阻兵而保威,割牲而盟以为信,汤行说众,杀伐以要利。是推乱以易暴也。吾闻古之士,遭治世不避其任,遇乱世不为苟存。今天下暗,周德衰,其并乎周以涂吾身也,不如避之,以洁吾行。」子北至于首阳之山,遂饿而死焉。若伯夷、叔齐者,其于富贵也,苟今天下暗,周德衰,其并乎周以涂吾身也,不如避之,以洁吾行。」子北至于首阳之山,遂饿而死焉。若伯夷、叔齐者,其于富贵也,苟可得已,则必不赖。高节戾行,独乐其志,不事于世。此二士之节也。卷九下第二十九盗跖 孔子与柳下季为友,柳下季之弟,名曰盗跖。盗跖从卒九千人,横天下,侵暴诸侯。穴室枢户,驱人牛马,取人妇女。贪得忘亲,不顾父母兄弟,不祭先祖。所过之邑,大国守城,小国入保,万民苦之。孔子谓柳下季曰:「夫人父者,必能诏其子;为人兄者,必能教其弟。若父不能诏其子,兄不教其弟,则无贵父子兄弟之亲矣。今先生,世之才士也,弟为盗跖,为天下害,而弗能也,丘窃为先生羞之。丘请为先生往说之。」柳下季曰:才士也,弟为盗跖,为天下害,而弗能也,丘窃为先生羞之。丘请为先生往说之。」柳下季曰:「先生言为人父者必能诏其子,为人兄者必能教其弟,若子不听父之诏,弟不受兄之教,虽今先生辩,将奈之何哉﹗且跖之为人也,心如涌泉,意如飘风,强足以距敌,辩足以饰非。顺其心则喜,逆其心则怒,易辱人以言。先生必无往。」孔不听,颜回驭,子贡为右,往见盗跖。 盗跖乃方休卒徒大山之阳,脍人肝而餔之。孔子下车而前,见谒者曰:人孔丘,闻将军高义,敬再拜谒者。」谒者入通。盗跖闻之大怒,目如明星,发上指冠,曰:「此夫鲁国之巧伪人孔丘非邪?为我告之:『尔作,见谒者曰:人孔丘,闻将军高义,敬再拜谒者。」谒者入通。盗跖闻之大怒,目如明星,发上指冠,曰:「此夫鲁国之巧伪人孔丘非邪?为我告之:『尔作言造语,妄称、,冠枝木之冠,带死牛之胁,多辞缪说,不耕而食,不织而衣,摇唇鼓舌,擅生非,以迷天下之主,使天下学士不反其本,妄作孝弟,而徼幸于封侯富贵者也。子之罪大极重,疾走归!不然,我将以子肝益昼餔之膳。』 孔子复通曰:「丘得幸于季,愿望履幕下。」谒者复通。盗跖曰:使来前!」孔子趋进,避席反走,再拜盗跖。盗跖大怒,将以子肝益昼餔之膳。』 孔子复通曰:「丘得幸于季,愿望履幕下。」谒者复通。盗跖曰:使来前!」孔子趋进,避席反走,再拜盗跖。盗跖大怒,两展其足,案剑瞋目,声如乳虎,曰:「丘来前!若所言,顺吾意则生,逆吾心则死。」 孔子曰:「丘闻之,凡天下有三德:生而长大,美好无双,少长贵贱见皆说之,此上德也;知维天地,能辩诸物,此中德也;勇悍果敢,聚众率兵,此下德。凡人有此一德者,足以面称孤矣。今将军兼此三者,身长八尺二寸,面目有光,唇如激丹,齿如齐贝,音中黄钟,而名曰盗跖,丘窃为将军耻不取焉。将军有意听臣,臣请南使吴越,使章鲁,东使宋卫,西使晋楚,使为将军造大城数百里,立数十万户之邑,尊将军为诸侯,与天下更始,罢兵休卒,收养昆弟,共祭先祖。此圣人才士之行,天下之愿也。」造大城数百里,立数十万户之邑,尊将军为诸侯,与天下更始,罢兵休卒,收养昆弟,共祭先祖。此圣人才士之行,天下之愿也。」 盗跖大怒曰:「丘来前!夫可规以利而可谏以言者,皆愚陋恒民之谓耳。大美好,人见而说之者,此吾父母之遗德也。丘虽不吾誉,吾独不自知邪?且吾,好面誉人者,亦好背而毁之。今丘告我以大城众民,是欲规我以利而恒民畜我,可久长也!城之大者,莫大乎天下矣。尧、舜有天下,子孙无置锥之地;汤、立为天子,而后世绝灭;非以其利大故邪?且吾闻之,古者禽兽多而人少,于是民皆巢居以避之。昼拾橡栗,暮栖木上,故命之曰『有巢氏之民』。古者民知衣服,夏多积薪,冬则炀之,故命之曰『知生以避之。昼拾橡栗,暮栖木上,故命之曰『有巢氏之民』。古者民知衣服,夏多积薪,冬则炀之,故命之曰『知生之民』。神农之世,卧则居,起则于于。民知其母,不知其父,与麋鹿共处,耕而食,织而衣,无有相害之心。至德之隆也。然而黄帝不能致德,与蚩尤战于涿鹿之野,流血百里。尧、舜作,立群臣;汤放其主,武王杀纣。自是之后,以强陵弱,以众暴寡。汤、武以来,乱人之徒也。今子修文、武之道,掌天下之辩,以教后世。缝衣浅带,矫言伪行,以迷惑天下之主,而欲求富贵焉,盗莫大于子。天下何故不谓子为盗丘,乃谓我为盗跖?子以甘辞说子路而使从之,使子路去其危冠,解其长剑,而受教于子,天下皆曰︰『孔丘,乃谓我为盗跖?子以甘辞说子路而使从之,使子路去其危冠,解其长剑,而受教于子,天下皆曰︰『孔丘能止暴禁非。』其卒之也,子路欲杀卫君而事不成,菹于卫东门之上,是子教之不至也。子自谓才士圣人邪﹖则再逐于鲁,削迹于卫,穷于齐,围于陈蔡,不容身于天下。子教子路菹此患,无以为身,下无以人,子之道岂足贵邪?世之所高,莫若黄帝,黄帝尚不能全德,而战于涿鹿之野,流血百里。尧不慈,舜不孝,禹偏枯,汤放其主,武纣,文王拘羑里。此六子者,世之所高也。孰论之,皆以利惑其真而强反其情性,乃甚可羞也。世之所谓贤士:伯夷、叔齐。伯夷、叔齐辞孤竹之君,而饿死于之山,骨肉不葬。鲍焦饰行非世,抱木而反其情性,乃甚可羞也。世之所谓贤士:伯夷、叔齐。伯夷、叔齐辞孤竹之君,而饿死于之山,骨肉不葬。鲍焦饰行非世,抱木而死。申徒狄谏而不听,负石自投于河,为鱼鳖所食。介子推至忠也,自割其股以食文公,文公后背之,子推怒而去,木而燔死。尾生与女子期于梁下,女子不来,水至不去,抱梁柱而死。此六子者,无异于磔犬流豕、操瓢而乞者,皆离名轻死,不念本养寿命者也。世之所忠臣者,莫若王子比干、伍子胥。子胥沉江,比干剖心,此二子者,世谓忠臣也,然卒为天下笑。自上观之,至于子胥、比干,皆不足贵也。丘之所以说我,若告我以鬼事,则我不能知也;若告我以人事者,不过此矣,皆吾所闻知也。吾告子以人之情,目欲视色,耳欲听声,口欲察味,我以人事者,不过此矣,皆吾所闻知也。吾告子以人之情,目欲视色,耳欲听声,口欲察味,志气欲盈。上寿百岁,中寿八十,下寿六十,除病瘦死丧忧患,其中开口而笑者,一月之中不过四五日而已矣。天与地无穷,人死者有时,操有之具,而托于无穷之间,忽然无异骐骥之驰过隙也。不能说其志意、养其寿命者,非通道者也。丘之所言,皆吾之所弃也,亟去走归,无复言之!子之道,狂狂汲汲,巧虚伪事也,非可以全真也,奚足论哉!」 孔子再拜趋走,出门上车,执辔三失,目芒然无见,色若死灰,据轼头,不能出气。 归到鲁东门外,适遇柳下季。柳下季曰:「今者阙然,数日不见,车马色,得微往见跖邪?」孔子仰天而叹曰:「然!」柳下季曰:「跖得无逆汝意若前乎?」子曰:「然。丘所谓无病而自灸也。疾走料虎头,编虎须,几不免虎口哉!」 孔子仰天而叹曰:「然!」柳下季曰:「跖得无逆汝意若前乎?」子曰:「然。丘所谓无病而自灸也。疾走料虎头,编虎须,几不免虎口哉!」 子张问于满苟得曰:「盍不为行?无行则不信,不信则不任,不任则不。故观之名,计之利,而义真是也。若弃名利,反之于心,则夫士之为行,不可日不为乎!」满苟得曰:「无耻者富,多信者显。夫名利之大者,几在无而信。故观之名,计之利,而信真是也。若弃名利,反之于心,则夫士之为行,抱其天乎!」子曰:「昔者桀、纣贵为天子,富有天下。今谓臧聚曰:『汝行无而信。故观之名,计之利,而信真是也。若弃名利,反之于心,则夫士之为行,抱其天乎!」子曰:「昔者桀、纣贵为天子,富有天下。今谓臧聚曰:『汝行如桀、。』则有怍色,有不服之心者,小人所贱也。仲尼、墨翟,穷为匹夫,今谓宰相曰子行如仲尼、墨翟。』则变容易色,称不足者,士诚贵也。故势为天子,未必贵;穷为匹夫,未必贱也;贵贱之分,在行之美恶。」满苟得曰:「小盗者拘,盗者为诸侯,诸侯之门,仁义存焉。昔者桓公小白杀兄入嫂,而管仲为臣;田成子常杀君窃国,而孔子受币。论则贱之,行则下之,则是言行之情悖战于胸也,不亦拂乎!故《书》曰:『孰恶孰美﹖成者为首,不成者为尾。』」子张曰:「子不为行,即将疏戚无伦,贵贱无义,长幼无序;﹖成者为首,不成者为尾。』」子张曰:「子不为行,即将疏戚无伦,贵贱无义,长幼无序;五纪六位,将何以为别乎?」苟得曰:「尧杀长子,舜流母弟,疏戚有伦乎?汤放桀,武王杀纣,贵贱有义乎?王季为适,周公杀兄,长幼有序乎?儒者伪辞,墨子兼爱,五纪六位,将别乎?且子正为名,我正为利。名利之实,不顺于理,不监于道。日与子讼于无约,曰『小人殉财,君子殉名,其所以变其精、易其性,则异矣;乃至于弃其所为而殉其所不为,则一也。』故曰:无为小人,反而天;无为君子,从天之理。若枉若直,相而天极;面观四方,与时消息。若是若,执而圆机;独成意,与道徘徊。无转而行,无成而义,将失而所为。无赴而富,无徇而若枉若直,相而天极;面观四方,与时消息。若是若,执而圆机;独成意,与道徘徊。无转而行,无成而义,将失而所为。无赴而富,无徇而成,将弃而天。比干剖心,子胥抉眼,忠之祸也;直躬证父,尾生溺死,信之患也;子立干,申子不自理,廉之害也;孔子不见母,匡子不见父,义之失也。此上世之所传、下世之所语,以为士者正其言,必其行,故服其殃,离其患也。」 无足问于知和曰:「人卒未有不兴名就利者。彼富则人归之,归则下之,则贵之。见下贵者,所以长生安体乐意之道也。今子独无意焉,知不足邪,意知而力不能行邪,故推正不妄邪?」知和曰:「今夫此人,以为与己同时而生,同乡而处者,为夫绝俗过世之士焉;是专无主正,所以览古今之时,是非之分也,与俗化世,去至重,弃至尊,以为其所为也。此其所以论长生安体乐意之道,不亦古今之时,是非之分也,与俗化世,去至重,弃至尊,以为其所为也。此其所以论长生安体乐意之道,不亦远乎!怛之疾,恬愉之安,不监于体;怵惕之恐,欣欢之喜,不监于心;知为为而不知所以为,是以贵为天子,富有天下,而不免于患也。」无足曰:「夫富之于,无所不利,穷美究势,至人之所不得逮,贤人之所不能及,侠人之勇力而以为强,秉人之知谋以为明察,因人之德以为贤良,非享国而严若君父。且夫声色滋味权势之于人,心不待学而乐之,体不待象而安之。夫欲恶避就,固不待师,人之性也。享国而严若君父。且夫声色滋味权势之于人,心不待学而乐之,体不待象而安之。夫欲恶避就,固不待师,人之性也。天下虽非我,孰能辞之!」知和曰:「知者之为,故动以百姓,不违其度,是以足而不争,无以为故不求。不足故之,争四处而不自以为贪;有故辞之,弃天下而不自以为廉。廉贪之实,非以迫外也,反监之度。势为天子,而不以贵骄人;富有天下,而不以财戏人。计其患,虑其反,以为害于性,故而不受也,非以要名誉也。尧、舜为帝而雍,仁天下也,不以美害生;善卷、许由得帝而不受,非虚辞让也,不以事害己。就其利、辞其害,而天下称贤焉,则可以有之,彼非以兴名誉也。」无足曰:「必名,苦体绝甘,约养以事害己。就其利、辞其害,而天下称贤焉,则可以有之,彼非以兴名誉也。」无足曰:「必名,苦体绝甘,约养以持生,则亦久病长阨而不死者也。」知和曰:「平为福,有余为害者,物莫不然,而财其甚者也。今富人,耳营钟鼓筦钥之声,口嗛于豢醪醴之味,以感其意,遗忘其业,可谓乱矣;侅溺于冯气,若负重行而上,可谓苦矣;贪财而取慰,贪权而取竭,静居则溺,体泽则冯,可谓疾矣;为欲就利,故满若堵耳而不知避,且冯而不舍,可谓辱矣;财积而无用,服膺而不舍,满心戚醮,求益而不止,可谓忧矣;内则疑劫请之贼,外则畏寇盗之害,楼疏,外不敢独行,可谓畏矣。此六者,天下之至害也,皆遗忘而不知察,及其患至,求尽性竭财,单以反一日之无故而不可得也。故观之名则不见,求之则不而不知察,及其患至,求尽性竭财,单以反一日之无故而不可得也。故观之名则不见,求之则不得。缭意绝体而争此,不亦惑乎!」
Interpretation

Yao wanted to yield the realm to Xu You, but Xu You refused. Yao then wanted to yield it to Zizhou Zhifu. Zizhou Zhifu said, “I might be able to govern the realm. But I am suffering from a distressing, troubled illness and am recuperating. I have no time to govern the realm.” The realm is an exceedingly precious thing, yet one must not damage one’s life for its sake, much less for the sake of lesser things. Only someone who does not pursue the realm as an aim can be entrusted with it.

Shun wanted to yield the realm to Zizhou Zhibo. Zizhou Zhibo said, “I am suffering from a distressing, troubled illness and am recuperating. I have no time to govern the realm.” The realm is a weighty vessel, yet it cannot be exchanged for one’s life. This is what sets a person of the Dao apart from a worldly person.

Shun wanted to yield the realm to Shanjuan. Shanjuan said, “I live between Heaven and Earth. In winter I wear fur, and in summer I wear hemp cloth. In spring I farm, working my body just enough; in autumn I harvest, and what I gain is enough for rest and food. I work at sunrise and rest at sunset, living freely between Heaven and Earth, with a contented heart. What would I want the realm for? How sad that you do not understand me.” With that, he refused. He then left and withdrew into the mountains.

Shun wanted to yield the realm to his friend, the farmer of Shihu. The farmer of Shihu said, “People in later generations are truly constrained. They even spend their strength governing the realm.” He considered Shun’s De insufficiently elevated, so he and his wife carried their child on their backs and moved to the sea, never to return.

King Danfu lived in Bin when the Di people attacked. King Danfu offered them leather and silk, but they would not accept them. He then offered dogs, horses, and pearls and jade, but they still refused. The Di wanted the land. King Danfu said, “If I let other people’s elder brothers or fathers be killed for the sake of land, I could not bear it. Settle here in peace if you wish! What difference is there between being my subjects and being subjects of the Di? I have heard that one must not harm some people in order to provide for others.” He then set off, leaning on his staff. The people followed him one after another, and in the end they established a state at the foot of Mount Qi.

King Danfu understood how to honor life. Those who understand how to honor life will not harm themselves to maintain their comforts, even when they are wealthy and honored; nor will they be ensnared by profit, even when they are poor and lowly. Today, those who hold high office in the world take the prospect of losing their position very seriously. When they see a chance for profit, they readily risk their lives. How confused they are!

Three successive rulers of Yue were murdered, so Prince Sou grew afraid and fled to hide in the Cinnabar Cave. Yue had no ruler, and the people found Prince Sou and asked him to return. He refused to come out, so they smoked him with burning mugwort and then helped him into the royal carriage. Prince Sou grasped the carriage straps as he climbed aboard, raised his face to Heaven, and cried, “To be a ruler! To be a ruler! Could you not just leave me alone?” Prince Sou did not hate being ruler; he hated the calamities that came with being ruler. A person like him, who would not damage his life for the sake of the state’s position, was precisely whom the people of Yue wanted to enthrone.

Han and Wei were disputing over land. Zihuazi visited Marquis Zhaoxi, who wore a troubled expression. Zihuazi said, “Suppose there were a tablet placed before you, with these words inscribed on it: ‘If you take it with your left hand, your right arm will be crippled; if you take it with your right hand, your left arm will be crippled. But whoever takes it will certainly gain the realm.’ Would you take it?” Marquis Zhaoxi said, “I would not.” Zihuazi said, “Good. By this measure, both your arms are more precious than the realm, and your body is more precious than both arms. Compared with the realm, Han is already much less significant; and the land you are fighting over is even less worth worrying about than the realm. Why grieve over not obtaining it to the point of damaging your body and injuring your life?” Marquis Zhaoxi said, “Well said! Many have instructed me, but I have never heard anything like this.” Zihuazi thought that he had understood how to weigh what matters.

The ruler of Lu heard that Yan He had attained the Dao and first sent someone to visit him with gifts. Yan He lived in a humble alley, wore coarse cloth, and pretended to be a cow eating grass. The messenger asked, “Is this Yan He’s home?” Yan He replied, “It is.” The messenger presented the gifts, and Yan He said, “I fear you have been misinformed and have sent the gifts to the wrong person. If you give them by mistake, you may be punished, so you should check again.” After returning to make inquiries, the messenger came back to find him, but Yan He had already disappeared. People like Yan He truly loathed wealth and honor.

Thus, the root of the Dao is used to cultivate oneself; what remains can be used to govern a state; and what remains after that, the tiniest portion, can be used to govern the realm. From this we can see that ruling as a king and governing a state are incidental tasks a sage may accomplish along the way. They are not done to preserve the body and nurture life. Yet worldly gentlemen today often risk danger and sacrifice their lives to pursue external things. How tragic! When a sage acts, he always examines the reasons and aims behind his actions. If someone used a marquis’s pearl to shoot at a sparrow a thousand fathoms above, everyone would laugh at him, because what he used to catch the sparrow was far too precious for what he hoped to gain. How much more precious is life than a marquis’s pearl!

Liezi was poor, and hunger showed on his face. Someone told Ziyang of Zheng, “Lie Yukou is a man of the Dao, yet he lives in your state in such poverty. Could it be that you do not value worthy people?” Ziyang sent an official to deliver grain to him. Liezi saw the messenger, bowed in thanks, and refused the grain. After the messenger left, Liezi returned indoors. His wife beat her chest and reproached him, saying, “I have heard that the wives and children of people of the Dao can live in comfort and happiness. Yet we are starving. The ruler has specially sent us grain, and you refuse it. Is it our fate to go hungry?” Liezi smiled and said, “The ruler does not know me. He sent the grain because he heard about me from someone else. If he later hears someone’s words and blames me, he will likewise lay the blame on me. That is why I refused the grain.” Later, the people indeed rebelled and killed Ziyang.

When King Zhao of Chu lost his state, Butcher Yang followed him into exile. After King Zhao regained the state, he wanted to reward those who had accompanied him, including Butcher Yang. Butcher Yang declined, saying, “When Your Majesty lost the state, I lost my meat-selling business. When Your Majesty regained the state, I also regained my meat-selling business. The emoluments I am entitled to have already been restored. What further reward would I need?” King Zhao insisted on rewarding him, but Butcher Yang said again, “Your Majesty’s loss of the state was not my fault, so I was not punished. Your Majesty’s recovery of the state was not my achievement, so I dare not accept a reward.” King Zhao wanted to summon him, but he said, “Chu’s rules allow only those who have rendered great service to meet the ruler. I did not have enough wisdom to preserve the state, nor the courage to die for it. When the Wu army entered Ying, I fled for fear of the ravages of war; I did not deliberately follow Your Majesty. If Your Majesty now breaks the law in order to meet me, that would go against the principles I have heard.” King Zhao then had Sima Ziqi invite him to take a high position. Butcher Yang again declined, saying, “I know that a high office is more honorable than selling meat, and that a generous stipend is greater than the proceeds of selling meat. But how could I covet rank and emoluments and give Your Majesty a reputation for bestowing favors arbitrarily? I dare not accept. I would rather return to my meat stall.” So he refused the reward.

Yuan Xian lived in Lu in a house enclosed by only a low wall. Its roof was thatched, its reed door was flimsy, its door pivots were made of mulberry wood, and broken pottery was set into the wall for windows. Rain leaked through the roof and the floor was damp, yet he still sat upright playing his qin. Zigong rode a fine horse, wore splendid clothes, and came to visit him in a grand carriage. Yuan Xian came out to greet him wearing a ragged hat and broken shoes, leaning on a goosefoot staff. Zigong asked, “Sir, how did you become so ill?” Yuan Xian replied, “I have heard that failing to put what one has learned into practice is called an illness. I am merely poor; I am not ill.” Zigong retreated in shame. Yuan Xian said, “Chasing fame and profit, forming factions with others, reading only to display oneself, teaching only to elevate oneself, turning benevolence and rightness into pretense, and dressing up one’s appearance with carriages and fine clothes—these are things I cannot bear to do.”

Zengzi lived in Wei, wearing a coarse robe without lining. His face was swollen, and his hands and feet were covered with calluses. For three days he had not lit a fire to cook, and for ten years he had bought no new clothes. When his hat cord broke, he tied it together; when his robe tore, raising his arm exposed his elbow; when his shoes split, his heels showed through. He dragged his shoes as he sang the “Hymn of Shang,” his voice ringing like metal and stone and resounding throughout Heaven and Earth. The Son of Heaven could not treat him as a subject, and the feudal lords could not treat him as a friend. Thus, those who cultivate the mind forget their appearance; those who cultivate the body forget profit; and those who attain the Great Dao forget even their private concerns.

Confucius said to Yan Hui, “Hui, come here. Your family is poor and your status low. Why do you not enter government service?” Yan Hui replied, “I do not want to serve in government. I have fifty mu of fields outside the city, enough to provide me with porridge; and ten mu inside the city, enough to grow hemp and raise silkworms. Playing the qin gives me pleasure, and learning your Dao gives me enough joy, so I do not want to serve in government.” Confucius’ expression changed, and he said, “Yan Hui’s resolve is admirable! I have heard these words: ‘Those who know contentment are not ensnared by profit; those who are truly at ease do not fear losing things; those who cultivate their inner selves are not ashamed to hold no office.’ I have recited these words for a long time, but today I have seen them in Yan Hui. That, too, is a gain for me.”

Prince Mou of Zhongshan said to Zhanzi, “My body is in the rivers and lakes, but my heart is still occupied with the court. What should I do?” Zhanzi said, “If you value life, profit will seem less important.” Prince Mou said, “I understand the principle, but I cannot restrain myself.” Zhanzi said, “If you cannot restrain yourself, then follow this inclination. But if you know you cannot do so and force yourself to suppress it, that will injure your spirit twice over. Someone injured twice over will find it difficult to live long.” Prince Mou was a prince by birth, yet he was able to withdraw into the mountains and forests. That was harder than a commoner’s withdrawal; though he had not attained the Great Dao, his resolve deserves praise.

Confucius was trapped between Chen and Cai. For seven days he had no cooked food, only a broth of wild greens with no grains in it. His face was gaunt, yet indoors he continued to play the qin and sing. Zilu and Zigong were picking greens as they talked together: “Our master was twice driven out of Lu, rejected in Wei, had a tree felled over him and was besieged in Song, was in distress in Qi, and is now surrounded between Chen and Cai. People want to kill him and no one stops them; they want to injure him and no one prevents them. Yet our master still plays the qin and sings. Is it not shameless of a gentleman to behave this way?” Yan Hui could not answer. He went in and told Confucius. Confucius pushed aside his qin and sighed, “Zilu and Zigong have shallow understanding. Let them come in, and I will explain it to them.” Zilu said, “Things have come to this point. It is fair to say we are at the end of our road!” Confucius said, “What kind of talk is that? When a gentleman is in accord with the Dao, that is called being on the road; when he departs from the Great Dao, that is called being in distress. I uphold the Dao of benevolence and rightness, yet have encountered the calamities of a disorderly age. How can that be called distress? When I examine myself within and find that I have not departed from the Great Dao, even when danger is at hand I do not lose my De. When winter comes and frost and snow fall, we see that pines and cypresses remain green. Being trapped between Chen and Cai is good fortune for me.” Confucius looked solemn and began playing and singing again. Zilu excitedly picked up a shield and danced. Zigong said, “Only now do I understand how high Heaven is and how deep Earth is.” People of the Dao in ancient times could be happy whether in hardship or success; they did not take hardship or success themselves as their joy. When one’s cultivation of the Dao reaches this level, hardship and success are like the natural changes of cold and heat, wind and rain. Xu You was at ease north of the Ying River, and Gongbo found contentment on Mount Gongshou.

Shun wanted to yield the realm to his friend Beiren Wu Ze. Beiren Wu Ze said, “How strange! This ruler lives out in the fields, yet comes and goes at Yao’s court. If that were all, it might be one thing; but now he wants to impose this polluted conduct on me. I am ashamed to see him.” So he threw himself into the Qingling Abyss and died.

Tang was preparing to attack Jie of Xia and went to consult Biansui. Biansui said, “This is not my business.” Tang asked, “Who should I consult?” Biansui said, “I do not know.” Tang then went to consult Maoguang. Maoguang also said, “This is not my business.” Tang asked, “Who should I consult?” Maoguang said, “I do not know.” Tang asked, “What about Yi Yin?” Maoguang replied, “He is fierce and can endure humiliation; beyond that, I know nothing.” Tang consulted Yi Yin, attacked Jie, and won. Afterward, he offered the realm to Biansui. Biansui declined, saying, “When you came to consult me about attacking Jie, you must have taken me for a co-conspirator. After defeating Jie, you offer me the realm, so you must take me for someone who covets power. I live in a disorderly age, and now a man without the Dao has twice sullied me with his actions. I cannot bear to hear any more of this.” So he drowned himself in the Chou River.

Tang then offered the realm to Maoguang, saying, “The wise make plans, the brave carry out deeds, and the benevolent govern the state. This is what the ancients did. Why do you not come forward and become ruler?” Maoguang declined, saying, “To depose the rightful ruler is unjust; to make the people suffer through war is not benevolent; to let others risk their lives fighting while I enjoy the spoils is not integrity. I have heard that one should not accept emoluments gained unjustly or set foot on land governed without the Dao. How much less should I accept the highest position? I cannot bear to go on watching.” He then carried a stone on his back and sank into the Lu River.

When the Zhou dynasty arose, the state of Guzhu had two worthy men, Boyi and Shuqi. They heard that there was a man in the west who seemed to possess the Dao, so they went to Qiyang to investigate. King Wu of Zhou sent Shudan to meet them and offered them an increase of two grades in emoluments, along with an official post. They slaughtered an animal, swore an oath over its blood, and buried their agreement. Boyi and Shuqi looked at each other and laughed. “How strange! This is completely different from the Dao we speak of. In ancient times, when Shennong governed the realm, people made offerings at the proper times and served the spirits with care, but did not pray for blessings. They served the people with loyalty and trust, but did not seek private gain. The ancients took joy in governing a state and also in governing it together with the people. They did not build up their own success on other people’s hardship, elevate themselves by lowering others, or take advantage of circumstances for private gain. Now Zhou saw that Shang was in turmoil and hastened to seize power. It plots above and distributes goods below, uses force to maintain its authority, and seals its promises with the slaughter of animals. Tang and Wu rouse the people and seek gain through killing. They have merely replaced one kind of disorder with another kind of tyranny. In ancient times, when scholars encountered a peaceful age, they did not evade their responsibilities; when they encountered a disorderly age, they did not cling to life at any cost. Now the realm is dark and the De of Zhou is declining. If we join Zhou’s enterprise, we will stain ourselves. Better to leave and preserve our integrity.” They went north to Mount Shouyang and eventually starved to death there. Boyi and Shuqi would give up wealth and honor whenever they could; their integrity was pure, and they found joy in their own aspirations, taking no part in worldly affairs. This was the integrity of the two men.

Robber Zhi

Confucius was friends with Liuxia Ji, whose younger brother was called Robber Zhi. Robber Zhi led nine thousand men as they rampaged across the realm, harassing the feudal lords, breaking through walls and doors, and stealing cattle, horses, and women. He was insatiably greedy and showed no consideration even for his relatives; he did not make offerings to his ancestors. When he passed through cities, great states shut their gates and stood guard, while small states took refuge in their fortresses. The people suffered greatly. Confucius said to Liuxia Ji, “A father should instruct his son, and an elder brother should instruct his younger brother. You are a worthy man of the world, yet your younger brother has become a calamity to the realm. You have failed to teach him properly, and I feel ashamed on your behalf. I am willing to go and persuade him.” Liuxia Ji said, “You say that fathers and elder brothers should instruct their sons and younger brothers. But if they do not listen, what can you do, however skilled your words may be? Zhi’s thoughts change swiftly, his actions are like the wind, his strength is enough to resist an enemy, and his eloquence is enough to cover up his faults. Agree with him and he is pleased; oppose him and he grows angry, and he is quick to humiliate people with his words. Please, do not go.”

Confucius did not listen. He had Yan Hui drive the carriage, with Zigong sitting on the right, and went to see Robber Zhi. At the time, Robber Zhi was resting with his followers on the southern slope of a mountain and eating roasted meat. Confucius got down from the carriage and went forward. He told the messenger, “Kong Qiu of Lu has heard of the general’s high-minded conduct and has come respectfully to pay his respects.” The messenger went in to report this. When Robber Zhi heard, he flew into a rage, his eyes gleaming and his hair standing on end. “Isn’t that the crafty, hypocritical Kong Qiu of Lu? Tell him: ‘You make up fine words and speak recklessly about right and wrong. You wear a hat like a branch and tie on a belt of oxhide, spouting crooked arguments. You eat without farming and wear clothes without weaving. You wag your tongue and presume to make judgments, confusing the rulers of the realm and causing scholars everywhere to forget their roots. You speak recklessly about filial piety and brotherly respect, hoping to win yourself a fief and riches. Your crimes are great. Get out at once! Otherwise I will take your liver and make it my midday meal!’”

Confucius sent another message: “I have received great kindness from Liuxia Ji, and hope to visit the general’s tent.” Robber Zhi let him in. Confucius hurried forward, gave way to the seat, and bowed twice to Robber Zhi. Robber Zhi, furious, stretched out his legs, pressed his hand on his sword, and glared at him. “Kong Qiu, come here! If what you say pleases me, you may live; if it goes against my wishes, you will die.”

Confucius said, “I have heard that there are three kinds of De in the world. To be born tall and handsome, so that men and women, old and young, high and low, all delight in seeing you—this is the highest De. To have wisdom that reaches through Heaven and Earth and can distinguish the myriad things—this is the middle De. To be brave and decisive, able to gather people and lead an army—this is the lowest De. Anyone who possesses just one of these can be called a leader. The general has all three. You are eight chi and two cun tall, your face shines, your lips are red, your teeth are even, and your voice is resonant, yet you are called Robber Zhi. I privately regret this on your behalf. If the general will listen to me, I would be willing to travel to Wu and Yue, and to Lu, Song, Wei, Jin, and Chu, to build you a great city hundreds of li across and establish a town with tens of thousands of households. The general would be honored as a feudal lord, and the realm could once again be at peace. You could stop fighting, allow your followers to rest, look after your brothers, and together make offerings to your ancestors. These are the deeds of sages and worthy men, and the wish of everyone in the realm.”

Robber Zhi flew into a rage. “Kong Qiu, come here! Those who try to tempt people with profit or admonish them with words are all foolish and shallow commoners. My appearance is a gift from my parents. Even if you do not praise me, do you think I do not know what I look like? Besides, you praise me to my face, but behind my back you may slander me. You try to persuade me with a great city and its people because you want to entice me with profit and treat me like a commoner. Is there any city greater than the realm itself? Yao and Shun possessed the realm, yet their descendants did not even have a patch of land large enough to stand on. Tang became Son of Heaven, yet his line came to an end. Was it not because the profits of power were too great?

“I have heard that in the distant past, there were many beasts and few people. People built nests in trees to escape the beasts. By day they gathered acorns and chestnuts; at night they slept in the trees. That is why they were called the people of Youchao, the Nest Builders. Later, people learned to make clothes. They piled up firewood in summer and kept warm in winter, so they were called the people who knew how to live. In the age of Shennong, people lived at ease and worked without strain. They knew their mothers but not their fathers; they lived among the elk and deer, farmed for food, and wove cloth for clothing. They had no desire to harm one another. That was the age when De was at its height.

“By the time of the Yellow Emperor, people could no longer preserve this De. He fought Chiyou in the wilderness of Zhuolu, and blood flowed for a hundred li. When Yao and Shun arose, they appointed ministers. Tang banished his ruler, and King Wu of Zhou killed Zhou. From then on, the strong oppressed the weak, and the many lorded it over the few. Ever since Tang and Wu, people have thrown the realm into disorder. You study the way of Kings Wen and Wu, master the art of argument, and teach it to later generations. You wear a broad robe and a pale sash, behave with studied formality, confuse the rulers of the realm, and still hope to gain wealth and honor. The greatest robber in the realm is you. Why does the world not call you ‘Robber Qiu,’ but call me Robber Zhi?

“You used smooth words to persuade Zilu to follow you. He took off his tall hat, unfastened his long sword, and accepted your teaching. People everywhere then said that Kong Qiu could prevent violence and stop wickedness. But later, Zilu tried to kill the ruler of Wei. He failed and was chopped into meat paste at the eastern gate of Wei. This shows that your teaching did not achieve its purpose. You call yourself a worthy man and a sage, yet you have been driven out of Lu again and again, rejected in Wei, trapped in Qi, and besieged between Chen and Cai. Nowhere in the realm is there a place for you. What is so worthy of honor in your Dao?

“The world praises the Yellow Emperor, but he too failed to preserve De: he fought at Zhuolu, and blood flowed for a hundred li. Yao was not loving, Shun was not filial, Yu was physically impaired, Tang banished his ruler, and King Wu of Zhou killed Zhou. King Wen of Zhou was imprisoned at Youli. If you examine these people whom the world praises, you will see that they all let profit confuse their nature and forcibly went against their own dispositions. That is shameful.

“The worthy men whom the world praises are Boyi and Shuqi. They gave up the throne of Guzhu and starved to death on Mount Shouyang. Bao Jiao adorned his conduct and criticized the age, then died embracing a tree. Shentu Di’s remonstrance went unheeded, so he tied a stone to himself, threw himself into a river, and was eaten by fish and turtles. Jie Zitui was utterly loyal and cut flesh from his thigh for Duke Wen of Jin to eat. Later, Duke Wen turned his back on him, so he hid in the mountains and was burned to death while embracing a tree. Weisheng made a tryst with a woman, but she did not come. Even when the floodwaters rose, he would not leave; he clung to a bridge pillar and drowned. These people valued their reputations and despised their lives. They neglected to nurture themselves and preserve their lives. They were no different from dogs and pigs that are slaughtered, or beggars holding out a gourd ladle.

“Among those the world calls loyal ministers, none are more famous than Prince Bi Gan and Wu Zixu. Wu Zixu was drowned in the river, and Bi Gan had his heart cut out, yet the world still calls them loyal. In my view, they are not worthy of praise either. Kong Qiu, if you talk about spirits and ghosts, I know nothing about them. If you talk about human affairs, they amount to no more than what I have just said. I have heard it all and know it all. People’s eyes want to see beauty, their ears want to hear music, their mouths want to taste delicacies, and their minds want to be satisfied. If a person lives to a hundred years, reaches middle age at eighty, and old age at sixty, then after subtracting sickness, decline, death, and worry, the days in any given month when he can laugh with delight amount to no more than four or five. Heaven and Earth are without end, but human life is limited. To place a limited life amid the boundless expanse of Heaven and Earth is like a fine horse flashing past a gap in the gate. Those who cannot satisfy their hearts and minds or nurture their years do not understand the Great Dao.

“I reject everything you have said. Leave at once and say no more! Your Dao is frantic and urgent, false and ornamental. It cannot preserve one’s true nature. What is there left to discuss?”

Confucius bowed again and again and hurried away. Once in the carriage, he repeatedly lost hold of the reins. His vision went dark, his face turned ashen, and he leaned against the crossbar, nearly unable to breathe.

At the eastern gate of Lu, Confucius met Liuxia Ji. Liuxia Ji said, “These past few days, you have looked unwell. Your carriage, your horses, and your face all seem out of sorts. Did you go to see Robber Zhi?” Confucius looked up to Heaven and sighed. “Yes.” Liuxia Ji asked, “Was Robber Zhi as contrary as I said he would be?” Confucius replied, “Yes. It was as though I had no illness but went and cauterized myself, or hurried to stroke a tiger’s head and braid its whiskers. I nearly failed to escape its jaws.”

Zizhang asked Mantougoude, “Why do you not cultivate your De? Without De, you will not gain people’s trust; without their trust, you will not be appointed to office or be able to accomplish anything. Fame and profit must be taken into account, and acting with rightness is the proper way. If one casts aside fame and profit and returns to one’s original nature, how could a scholar fail to cultivate his De?” Mantougoude replied, “People without shame become wealthy, and those who speak of trustworthiness rise to high office. Great fame and profit often come from shamelessness and hypocrisy. If you cast aside fame and profit and seek only your original nature, scholars will instead have their inborn nature constrained.”

Zizhang said, “Jie and Zhou were emperors and possessed the wealth of the realm. Today, if someone said that a thief acted like Jie or Zhou, he would feel ashamed and refuse to accept it. Confucius and Mozi were as poor as commoners. Today, if someone told a prime minister that his conduct was like Confucius’s or Mozi’s, his expression would change, and he would feel unworthy of the comparison. Clearly, scholars are indeed held in high regard. Holding the position of Son of Heaven is not necessarily to be honored, and being a poor commoner is not necessarily to be lowly. The distinction between honor and disgrace lies in the goodness or badness of one’s conduct.”

Mantougoude said, “Petty thieves are caught, but great robbers become feudal lords, and their courts are where people talk about benevolence and rightness. Duke Huan, Xiaobai, killed his elder brother and married his sister-in-law, yet Guan Zhong served him as a minister. Tian Chengzi killed his ruler and seized his state, yet Confucius accepted gifts from him. Their words condemn these men as lowly, yet their actions attach themselves to them. Their words, actions, and hearts contradict one another. Is that not a betrayal of one’s original nature? So an ancient text says, ‘Those who succeed become leaders; those who fail become followers.’”

Zizhang said, “If people do not cultivate their conduct, how will the distinctions between close and distant relations, high and low status, and elder and younger be maintained? On what basis will the Five Relationships and the six ranks be distinguished?” Mantougoude said, “Yao killed his eldest son, and Shun banished his younger brother by the same mother. Where was the order between close and distant relations? Tang banished Jie, and King Wu killed Zhou. Where was the principle that distinguishes high from low? King Ji of Zhou became heir, and the Duke of Zhou later killed his elder brother. Where was the order between elder and younger? Confucian words are false, and the Mohists advocate universal love. How can the Five Relationships and six ranks draw any clear boundaries?

“You pursue fame, and I pursue profit. The substance of both fame and profit is contrary to the Dao. The ancients said, ‘Petty people sacrifice their lives for money; gentlemen sacrifice their lives for fame. They change their spirit and go against their nature. Their motives differ, but the result is the same.’ So do not be a petty person, and do not be a gentleman; return instead to your inborn nature. Whatever the course of your conduct, whether crooked or straight, respond to the natural order and observe the four directions, adapting as circumstances change. Do not stubbornly alter your way of acting, and do not impose a fixed code of rightness; otherwise you will lose your nature. Do not pursue wealth and honor, and do not sacrifice your life for fame, or you will cast aside your inborn nature. Bi Gan’s heart was cut out and Wu Zixu’s eyes were gouged out: these were calamities brought on by loyalty. Zhi Gong reported his father and Weisheng drowned: these were calamities brought on by trustworthiness. Jie Zitui was burned to death and Shentu Di did not defend himself: these were the harms of integrity. Confucius would not see his mother, and Kuangzi would not see his father: these were errors caused by a sense of rightness. These stories have been handed down from age to age to teach people proper words and conduct, yet they lead people to disaster and suffering.”

Wuzu asked Zhihe, “Everyone pursues fame and profit. When people become wealthy, others flock to them and honor them. People think that being honored is a way to live long, remain secure, and be happy. You alone seem not to care about such things. Is it because you lack insight, because you intend to act this way but cannot, or because you deliberately pretend to be upright?” Zhihe said, “People today think that those among their contemporaries and fellow townspeople who stand out from the crowd are the truly insightful. In fact, they have no standard by which to judge right and wrong. They follow the customs of the age, cast aside what is most important and most precious—their lives—and care only about doing what they want. Their talk about ways to live long, remain secure, and be happy is far removed from the truth of right and wrong, both past and present. Terror and sorrow cannot nurture the body, and fear and joy cannot calm the mind. They know only that they must act, but do not know why. So even if they are honored as Son of Heaven and possess the wealth of the realm, they cannot escape calamity.”

Wuzu said, “Wealth and honor bring every advantage. One can enjoy every luxury and possess authority; even the Perfected and the worthy cannot match such people. They borrow the strength of warriors to display their might, the wisdom of strategists to seem discerning, and the De of others to appear worthy. Even without a state of their own, they can command the awe of a ruler and father. People do not need to learn to enjoy sound, beauty, delicious food, or power; the body feels at ease without having to imitate anyone. Likes, dislikes, choices, and rejections are simply part of human nature. If everyone in the realm opposed me, who could refuse these benefits?”

Zhihe said, “A wise person acts with consideration for the people and does not violate what is proper. So he is content and does not contend, and he does not deliberately seek to acquire more. Those who feel they have too little contend everywhere, yet do not think themselves greedy. Those who have something to seek and then decline it may renounce the realm without considering themselves pure. The substance of purity and greed does not lie outside us; we must turn back and examine the measure within our own hearts. Some occupy the position of Son of Heaven yet do not lord it over others; some possess the wealth of the realm yet do not use their riches to toy with people. They weigh the dangers and consequences, decide that these things would harm their nature, and refuse them. They do not do so to win a reputation. Yao and Shun ruled as emperors yet lived at ease because they loved the realm without letting its splendor damage their lives. Shanjuan and Xu You were offered the imperial throne but refused it, not as a show of modesty, but because they did not want affairs of state to harm them. If one can accept what benefits one and decline what harms one, then even if the realm calls him worthy, he can possess these things; he has not sought them for the sake of a name.”

Wuzu said, “To suffer hardship for the sake of a reputation, to give up what is sweet, and to limit one’s provisions in order to preserve life—doesn’t that resemble a long illness and a life of misery?” Zhihe said, “Balance and moderation are good fortune; excess is calamity. This is true of all things, and especially of money. The ears of the rich are beset by bells, drums, and pipes; their mouths crave fine wine and delicacies. Their minds are thrown into confusion, and they forget their proper work. They are like people carrying heavy loads uphill, trapped by their power and desires. One could call it toil. Greed for money brings worry; greed for power wears a person out. It is easy to become indulgent in leisure, and physical ease can make a person restless. One could call it illness. When desire and profit are before one’s eyes, greed blocks the way like a wall, and one does not know to avoid it. One could call it humiliation. People hoard wealth without using it and cling tightly to it, distressed and uneasy in their hearts; they keep seeking more and never stop. One could call it anxiety. At home, they fear thieves will rob them; when they go out, they fear bandits will harm them. They fortify their dwellings so thoroughly that they dare not even go out alone. One could call it fear.

“These six conditions are the greatest calamities in the realm, yet people forget to reflect on them. Once calamity strikes, they may want to spend all they own to buy back even a single day of peace, but it is already too late. Fame is invisible and cannot be grasped, yet it drives people to exhaust their minds and damage their bodies in pursuit of it. Is that not foolish?”

卷十上第三十说剑 昔赵文王喜剑,剑士夹门而客三千余人,日夜相击于前,死伤者岁百人,好之不厌。如是三年,国衰,诸侯谋之。太子悝患之,募左右曰:「孰能说王之意止士者,赐之千金。」左右曰:「庄子当能。」子乃使人以千金奉庄子。庄子弗受,与使者俱,往见太子,曰:「太子何以教周,赐周千金?」太子曰:「闻夫子明圣,谨奉千金以币从者。夫子弗受,悝何敢言﹗」庄子曰:「闻太子所欲用周者,欲绝王之喜好也。使臣上说大王而逆王意,下不当太子,则身刑而死,周尚安所事金乎?使臣上说大王,下当太,赵国何求而不得也!」太子曰︰「然。吾王所见,唯剑士也。」庄子曰下不当太子,则身刑而死,周尚安所事金乎?使臣上说大王,下当太,赵国何求而不得也!」太子曰︰「然。吾王所见,唯剑士也。」庄子曰:「诺。善为剑。」太子曰:「然王所见剑士,皆蓬头突鬓,垂冠,曼胡之缨,短后之衣,瞋目而语难,王乃说之。今夫子必儒服而见王,事必大。」庄子曰:「请治剑服。」治剑服三日,乃见太子。太子乃与见王,王脱白刃待之。子入殿门不趋,见王不拜。王曰:「子欲何以教寡人,使太子先﹖」曰:「臣闻喜剑,故以剑见王。」王曰:「子之剑何能禁制?」曰:「臣王不拜。王曰:「子欲何以教寡人,使太子先﹖」曰:「臣闻喜剑,故以剑见王。」王曰:「子之剑何能禁制?」曰:「臣之剑,十步一人,不留行。」王大说,曰:「天下无敌矣﹗」庄子曰:「夫为剑者,示之以虚,开利,后之以发,先之以至。愿得试之。」王曰:「夫子休,就舍待命,令设戏请夫子。」王乃校剑士七日,死伤者六十余人,得五六人,使奉剑于殿下,乃庄。王曰:「今日试使士敦剑。」庄子曰:「望之久矣!」王曰:「夫子所御杖,长短何如?」曰:「臣之所奉皆可。然臣有三剑,唯王所用,请先言而后试。」曰:「愿闻剑。」曰:「有天子剑,有诸侯剑,有庶人剑。」王曰:所奉皆可。然臣有三剑,唯王所用,请先言而后试。」曰:「愿闻剑。」曰:「有天子剑,有诸侯剑,有庶人剑。」王曰:「天子之剑何如?」曰:「天子之剑,以燕溪石城为锋,齐岱为锷,晋卫为脊,周宋为镡,魏为夹;包以四夷,裹以四时;绕以渤海,带以常山;制以五行,论以刑德;开以阴阳,持以春夏,行以秋冬。此剑,直之无前,举之无上,案之无下,运无旁,上决浮云,下绝地纪。此剑一用,匡诸侯,天下服矣。此天子之剑也。」文王芒然自失,曰:「诸侯之剑何如?」曰:「诸侯之剑,以知勇士为锋,以清士为,以贤良士为脊,以忠用,匡诸侯,天下服矣。此天子之剑也。」文王芒然自失,曰:「诸侯之剑何如?」曰:「诸侯之剑,以知勇士为锋,以清士为,以贤良士为脊,以忠圣士为镡,以豪杰士为夹。此剑,直之亦无前,举之亦无,案之亦无下,运之亦无旁;上法圆天,以顺三光,下法方地,以顺四,中和民意,以安四乡。此剑一用,如雷霆之震也,四封之内,无不宾服而听从命者矣。此诸侯之剑也。」王曰:「庶人之剑何如?」曰:「庶人之剑,蓬头突鬓,垂冠,曼胡之缨,短后之衣,瞋目而语难,相击于前,上斩颈领,下决肝。此庶人之剑,无异于斗鸡,一旦命已绝矣,无所用于国事。今大王有天子之位好庶人之剑,臣窃为大王薄之。」王乃牵而上殿。宰人上食,王三环之。庄曰:「大王安坐定气,剑事已毕奏矣!」于是文王不出宫三月,剑士皆服毙其处也。卷十上第三十大王薄之。」王乃牵而上殿。宰人上食,王三环之。庄曰:「大王安坐定气,剑事已毕奏矣!」于是文王不出宫三月,剑士皆服毙其处也。卷十上第三十一渔父 孔子游乎缁帷之林,休坐乎杏坛之上。弟子读书,孔子弦歌鼓琴。曲未半。有渔父者,下船而来,须眉交白,被发揄袂,行原以上,距陆而止,左手据膝,右手持颐以听。曲终而招子贡、子路,二人俱对。客指孔子曰:「彼为者也?」子路对曰:「鲁之君子也。」客问其族。子路对曰:「族孔氏。」客曰:「孔氏者何治也,二人俱对。客指孔子曰:「彼为者也?」子路对曰:「鲁之君子也。」客问其族。子路对曰:「族孔氏。」客曰:「孔氏者何治也?」子路未应,子贡对曰:「孔氏者,性服忠信,身行仁义,礼乐,选人伦,上以忠于世主,下以化于齐民,将以利天下。此孔氏之所治也。」又问曰:「有土之君与?」子贡曰:「非也。」「侯王之佐与?」子贡曰:「非也。」乃笑而还,行言曰:「仁则仁矣,恐不免其身;苦心劳形以危其真。呜呼!远哉,其分于道也﹗」 子贡还,报孔子。孔子推琴而起,曰:「其圣人与﹗」乃下求之,至于畔,方将杖拏而引其船,顾见孔子,还乡而立。孔子反走,再拜而进。客曰:「子将何?」孔子曰:「曩者先生有绪言而去,丘不肖,未知所谓,窃待于下风,幸孔子反走,再拜而进。客曰:「子将何?」孔子曰:「曩者先生有绪言而去,丘不肖,未知所谓,窃待于下风,幸闻咳唾音,以卒相丘也﹗」客曰:「嘻!甚矣,子之好学也!」孔子再拜而起,曰:「丘而修学,以至于今,六十九岁矣,无所得闻至教,敢不虚心!」客曰:「同类相从,声相应,固天之理也。吾请释吾之所有而经子之所以。子之所以者,人事也。子诸侯大夫庶人,此四者自正,治之美也;四者离位而乱莫大焉。官治其职,人忧事,乃无所陵。故田荒室露,衣食不足,征赋不属,妻妾不和,长少无序,庶人之也;能不胜任,官事不治,行不清白,群下荒怠,功美不室露,衣食不足,征赋不属,妻妾不和,长少无序,庶人之也;能不胜任,官事不治,行不清白,群下荒怠,功美不有,爵禄不持,大夫之忧;廷无忠臣,国家昏乱,技不巧,贡职不美,春秋后伦,不顺天子,诸侯之忧也;阴阳不和,寒暑不时,以伤庶物,诸侯暴乱,擅相攘伐,以残民人,礼乐不节,财用穷匮,人伦不饬,姓淫乱,天子有司之忧也。今子既上无君侯有司之势,而下无大臣职事之官,而擅饰礼乐,选人伦,以化齐民,不泰多事乎?且人有八疵,事有四患,不可察也。非其事而事之,谓之总;莫之顾而进之,谓之佞;希意道言,谓之谄;不择是非而言,谓之谀;好言人之恶,谓之谗;析交离亲,谓之贼;称誉诈伪败恶人,谓之慝;不择善否,两容颊适,偷拔其所欲,谓之谀;好言人之恶,谓之谗;析交离亲,谓之贼;称誉诈伪败恶人,谓之慝;不择善否,两容颊适,偷拔其所欲,谓之险。此八疵者,外以乱人,内以伤身,君子不友,明君不臣。所谓四患者:好经大事,变更易常,挂功名,谓之叨;专知擅事,侵人自用,谓之贪;见过不更,闻谏愈甚,谓之很;人同于己则可,不同于己,虽善不善,谓之矜。此四患也。能去八疵,无四患,而始可教已。 孔子愀然而叹,再拜而起,曰:「丘再逐于鲁,削迹于卫,伐树于宋,陈蔡。丘不知所失,而离此四谤者何也?」客凄然变容曰:「甚矣,子之难悟也!人影恶鲁,削迹于卫,伐树于宋,陈蔡。丘不知所失,而离此四谤者何也?」客凄然变容曰:「甚矣,子之难悟也!人影恶迹而去之走者,举足愈数而迹愈多,走愈疾而影不离身,自以为尚迟,疾休,绝力而死。不知处阴以休影,处静以息迹,愚亦甚矣!子审仁义之间,察同际,观动静之变,适受与之度,理好恶之情,和喜怒之节,而几于不免矣。谨修,慎守其真,还以物与人,则无所累矣。今不修身而求之人,不亦外乎!」 孔子愀然曰:「请问何谓真?」客曰:「真者,精诚之至也。不精不诚,能动人。强哭者虽悲不哀,强怒者虽严不威,强亲者虽笑不和。真悲无声而哀,真怒未发而威,真亲未。强哭者虽悲不哀,强怒者虽严不威,强亲者虽笑不和。真悲无声而哀,真怒未发而威,真亲未笑而和。真在内者,神动于外,是所以贵真也。其用于人理也,亲则慈孝,事君则忠贞,饮酒则欢乐,处丧则悲哀。忠贞以功为主,饮酒以乐为主,处丧以哀为主,事亲以适为主。功成之美,无一其迹矣;事亲以适,不所以矣;饮酒以乐,不选其具矣;处丧以哀,无问其礼矣。礼者,世俗之所为也;真者,所以受于天也,自然不可易也。故圣人法天贵真,不拘于俗。愚者此。不能法天而恤于人,不知贵真,禄禄而受变于俗,故不足。惜哉,子之蚤湛于人伪而晚闻大道也!」 孔子再拜而起曰:「今者丘得遇也,若天幸然。先生不羞而比惜哉,子之蚤湛于人伪而晚闻大道也!」 孔子再拜而起曰:「今者丘得遇也,若天幸然。先生不羞而比之服役,而身教之。敢问舍所在,请因受业而卒学大道。」曰:「吾闻之,可与往者与之,至于妙道,不可与往者,不知其道,慎勿与之,身乃无咎。子勉之﹗吾去子矣,吾去子矣!」乃剌船而去,延缘苇闲。 颜渊还车,子路授绥,孔子不顾,待水波定,不闻拏音而后敢乘。子路旁车而问:「由得为役久矣,未尝见夫子遇人如此其威也。万乘之主,千乘君,见夫子未尝不分庭伉礼,夫子犹有倨敖后敢乘。子路旁车而问:「由得为役久矣,未尝见夫子遇人如此其威也。万乘之主,千乘君,见夫子未尝不分庭伉礼,夫子犹有倨敖之容。今渔父杖拏逆立,而夫子曲要磬折,言拜应,得无太甚乎﹖门人皆怪夫子矣,渔人何以得此乎﹖」孔子伏轼而叹,曰:「甚矣,之难化也!湛于礼义有间矣,而朴鄙之心至今未去。进,吾语汝:夫遇长不敬,也;见贤不尊,不仁也。彼非至人,不能下人。下人不精,不得其真,故长伤身。惜哉!不仁之于人也,祸莫大焉,而由独擅之。且道者,万物之所由也,失之者死,得之者生,为事逆之则败,顺之则成。故道之所在,圣人尊之。今之渔父之,可谓有矣,吾敢不敬乎!」卷十上第三十二列御寇 列御寇之齐,中道而反,遇伯昏瞀人。伯昏瞀人曰:「奚方而反?」曰:「吾惊焉。」曰:「恶乎惊?」曰:「吾三十二列御寇 列御寇之齐,中道而反,遇伯昏瞀人。伯昏瞀人曰:「奚方而反?」曰:「吾惊焉。」曰:「恶乎惊?」曰:「吾尝食于十,而五浆先馈。」伯昏瞀曰:「若是,则汝何为惊已?」曰:「夫内诚不解,形谍成光,以外镇人心,使人轻乎贵老,齑其所患。夫浆人特为食羹之货,无多余之赢,其为利也薄,其为权也轻,而若是,而况于万乘之主乎﹖身劳于国,而知尽于事,彼将任我以事,而效我以功。是以惊。」伯昏瞀人曰:「善哉观乎!处已,人将保汝矣!」无几何而往,则户外之屦满事,而效我以功。是以惊。」伯昏瞀人曰:「善哉观乎!处已,人将保汝矣!」无几何而往,则户外之屦满矣。伯昏瞀人北面而立,敦杖蹙之乎颐,立有间,不言而出。宾者以告列子,列子提屦,跣而走,暨于门,:「先生既来,曾不发药乎?」曰:「已矣,吾固告汝曰:人将保汝,果保汝矣!汝能使人保汝,而汝不能使人无保汝也,而焉用之感豫出异也﹗必且有感,摇而本才,又无谓也。与汝游者,又莫汝告也。彼所小言,尽人毒也。莫觉莫悟,相孰也﹗巧者劳而知者忧,能者无所求,饱食而敖游,泛若不系之舟,虚而敖游者也!」 郑人缓也,呻吟裘氏之地。祗三年而缓为儒。河润九里,泽及三族,其弟墨。儒墨相与辩,其父助翟。十年而缓自杀。其父梦之曰:「使而子为墨者,予也,胡尝视其良?既为秋柏之实矣﹖」夫造物者之报人也,不报其人而报其人之天,故使彼。自杀。其父梦之曰:「使而子为墨者,予也,胡尝视其良?既为秋柏之实矣﹖」夫造物者之报人也,不报其人而报其人之天,故使彼。夫人以己为有以异于人以贱其亲,人之井饮者相捽也。故曰:今之世皆缓也。自是,有德者以不知也,而况有道者乎!古者谓之遁天之刑。圣人安其所安,不安其所不安;众人安其所不安,安其所安。 庄子曰:「知道易,勿言难。知而不言,所以之天也;知而言之,所以人也;古之人,天而不人。」 朱泙漫学屠龙于支离益,单千金之家,三年技成而无所用其巧。 圣人以必不必,故无兵;众人以不必必之,故多兵。顺于兵,故行有求。兵,之则亡。 小夫之知,不离苞苴竿牍,敝精神乎蹇浅,而欲兼济道物,太一形虚。若是者,迷惑于宇宙,形累不知太初。彼至人者,归精神乎无始,而冥乎无何有之乡。水流乎无形,发泄乎太清。悲哉乎!汝为知太初。彼至人者,归精神乎无始,而冥乎无何有之乡。水流乎无形,发泄乎太清。悲哉乎!汝为知在毫毛,而不知大宁﹗ 宋人有曹商者,为宋王使秦。其往也,得车数乘;王说之,益车百乘。反于宋,见庄子,曰:「夫处穷闾阨巷,困窘织屦,槁项黄馘者,商所短也;一悟万乘之主而从车百乘者,商之所长也。」庄子曰:「秦王有病召医,破痈溃痤者得车一乘,舐痔者得车五乘,所治愈下,得车愈多。子岂治其邪?何得车之多也?子行矣!」 鲁哀公问乎颜阖曰:「吾以仲尼为贞干,国其有瘳乎?」曰:「殆哉圾尼﹗方且饰羽而画,从事华辞,以支为旨,忍性以视民,而不知不信,受乎心,宰,夫何足以上民!彼宜女与﹖予颐与﹖误而可矣!今使民离实学伪,非所以视民,后世饰羽而画,从事华辞,以支为旨,忍性以视民,而不知不信,受乎心,宰,夫何足以上民!彼宜女与﹖予颐与﹖误而可矣!今使民离实学伪,非所以视民,后世虑,不若休之。难治也!」 施于人而不忘,非天布也,商贾不齿,虽以事齿之,神者弗齿。 为外刑者,金与木也;为内刑者,动与过也。宵人之离外刑者,金木讯之;离内刑者,阴阳食之。夫免乎外内之刑者,唯真能之。 孔子曰:「凡人心险于山川,难于知天。天犹有春秋冬夏旦暮之期,人厚貌深情。故有貌愿而益,有长若不肖,有顺懁而达,有坚而缦,有缓而焊。其就义若渴者,其去义若热。故君子远使之而观其忠,近使之而观其敬,烦使而观其能,卒然问焉而达,有坚而缦,有缓而焊。其就义若渴者,其去义若热。故君子远使之而观其忠,近使之而观其敬,烦使而观其能,卒然问焉而观其知,急与之期而观其信,委之以财而观其仁,告之以危而观其节,醉之以酒而观其侧,杂之以处而观其色。九征至,不肖人得矣。」 正考父一命而伛,再命而偻,三命而俯,循墙而走,孰敢不轨!如而者,一命而吕巨,再命而于车上舞,三命而名诸父。孰协唐许﹗ 贼莫大乎德有心而心有睫,及其有睫也而内视,内视而败矣! 凶德有五,中德为首。何谓中德?中德也者,有以自好也而訾其所不者也。 穷有八极,达有三必,! 凶德有五,中德为首。何谓中德?中德也者,有以自好也而訾其所不者也。 穷有八极,达有三必,形有六府。美、髯、长、大、壮、丽、勇、敢,八者俱过人也,因以是;缘循、偃仰、困畏不若人,三者俱通达。知慧外通,勇动多怨,仁义多责。达之情者傀,达于知者肖;达大命者随,达小命者遭。 人有见宋王者,锡车十乘。以其十乘骄稚庄子。庄子曰:「河上有家贫纬萧而食者,其子没于渊,得千金之珠。其父谓其子曰:『取石来锻之!夫千金之珠,必在九重之渊而骊龙颔下,子能得珠者,必遭其睡也。使骊龙而寤,尚奚微之有哉!』今宋国之深,非直九重之渊也;宋王之猛,非直骊龙也;子能得车者,必遭其睡也。使宋王而寤,奚微之有哉!』今宋国之深,非直九重之渊也;宋王之猛,非直骊龙也;子能得车者,必遭其睡也。使宋王而寤,子为齑粉夫。」 或聘于庄子,庄子应其使曰:「子见夫牺牛乎?衣以文绣,食以刍叔,及其牵而入于大庙,欲为孤犊,其可得乎!」 庄子将死,弟子欲厚葬之。庄子曰:「吾以天地为棺椁,以日月为连璧,辰为珠玑,万物为赍送。吾葬具岂不备邪?何以加此!」弟子曰:「吾恐乌鸢之食夫子也。」庄子曰:「在上为乌鸢食,在下为蝼蚁食,夺彼与此,何其偏﹗」 以不平平,其平也不平;以不征征,其征也不征。明者唯为之使,神者征之。明之不胜神也久矣,而愚者恃其所见入于人,其功外也,不亦悲夫!

No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.

卷十下第三十三天下 天下之治方术者多矣,皆以其有为不可加矣。古之所谓道术者,果恶?曰:「无乎不在。」曰︰「神何由降?明何由出?」夫! 卷十下第三十三天下 天下之治方术者多矣,皆以其有为不可加矣。古之所谓道术者,果恶?曰:「无乎不在。」曰︰「神何由降?明何由出?」「圣有所生,王有所成,皆于一。」不离于宗,谓之天人;不离于精,谓之神人;不离于真,谓之至人。以天为宗,以德为本,以道为门,兆于变化,谓之圣人。以仁为恩,以义为理,礼为行,以乐为和,熏然慈仁,谓之君子。以法为分,以名为表,以为验,以稽为决,其数一二三四是也,百官以此相齿,以事为常,以衣食为主,蕃息畜藏,老弱孤寡为意,有以养,民之理也。古之人其备乎!配神明,醇天地,育物,和天下,泽及百姓,明于本数以事为常,以衣食为主,蕃息畜藏,老弱孤寡为意,有以养,民之理也。古之人其备乎!配神明,醇天地,育物,和天下,泽及百姓,明于本数,系于末度,六通四辟,小大精粗,其运无乎不在。其明而在数度者,旧法、世传之史尚多有之;其在于《诗》、《书》、《礼》、乐》者,邹鲁之士、搢绅先生多能明之。《诗》以道志,《书》以道事,《礼》以道行,《乐》以道和,《易》以道阴阳,《春秋》以道名分。其数散于天下而于中国者,百家之学时或称而道之。 天下大乱,贤圣不明,道德不一。天下多得一察焉以自好。譬如耳目,皆有所明,不能相通。犹百家众乱,贤圣不明,道德不一。天下多得一察焉以自好。譬如耳目,皆有所明,不能相通。犹百家众技也,皆有所长,时有所用。虽然,不该不遍,一之士也。判天地之美,析万物之理,察古人之全,寡能备于天地之美,称神之容。是故内圣外王之道,暗而不明,郁而不发,天下之人各为其所欲焉以自为方。悲夫!百家往而不反,必不合矣!后世之学者,不幸不见天地之纯,古之大体。道术将为天下裂。 不侈于后世,不靡于万物,不晖于数度,以绳墨自矫,而备世之急。道术有在于是者。墨翟、禽滑厘闻其风而说之。为之大过,已之大顺。作为《非乐》,曰《节用》;生不歌,死无服。墨子泛爱兼利而非斗,其道不怒;又好学而博,不与先王同,毁古之礼乐。黄帝有《咸池》,尧有《大章》,舜有《大韶》,禹大夏》,汤有《大濩》,文王有辟雍之乐,武王非斗,其道不怒;又好学而博,不与先王同,毁古之礼乐。黄帝有《咸池》,尧有《大章》,舜有《大韶》,禹大夏》,汤有《大濩》,文王有辟雍之乐,武王、周公作《武》。古之丧礼,贵贱有仪,上下有等,天子棺椁七重,诸侯五重,大夫三重,士再重。今墨子独生不,死无服,桐棺三寸而无椁,以为法式。以此教人,恐不爱人;以此自行,固不己。未败墨子道,虽然,歌而非歌,哭而非哭,乐而非乐,是果类乎?其生也勤,其死也薄,其道大觳;使人忧,使人悲,其行难为也。恐其不以为圣人之,反天下之心。天下不堪。墨子虽独能任,奈天下何!离于天下,其去王也远矣!墨子称道:「昔者禹之湮洪水,决江河而通四夷九州岛也,名川三百,支川三千,者无数。禹亲自操橐耜而九杂天下之川;腓无胈,胫无毛,沐甚雨,栉疾风,置万国。禹大圣也河而通四夷九州岛也,名川三百,支川三千,者无数。禹亲自操橐耜而九杂天下之川;腓无胈,胫无毛,沐甚雨,栉疾风,置万国。禹大圣也,而形劳天下也如此。」使后世之墨者,多以裘褐为衣,以蹻为服,日夜不休,以自苦为极,曰:「不能如此,非禹之道也,不足谓墨。」相里勤之弟子,五侯之徒,南方之墨者若获、已齿、邓陵子之属,俱诵《墨经》,倍谲不同,相谓别墨;以坚白同异之辩相訾,以觭偶不仵之辞相应;以巨子为圣人。皆愿为之尸,冀得为其后世,至今不决。墨翟、禽滑厘之意则是,其行非也。将使后世之墨者,必以自苦腓无胈、胫无相应;以巨子为圣人。皆愿为之尸,冀得为其后世,至今不决。墨翟、禽滑厘之意则是,其行非也。将使后世之墨者,必以自苦腓无胈、胫无毛相进而已矣。乱之上也,治之下也。虽然,墨子真天下之好也。将求之不得也,虽枯槁不舍也,才士也夫! 不累于俗,不饰于物,不苟于人,不忮于众,愿天下之安宁以活民命,我之养,毕足而止,以此白心。古之道术有在于是者。宋钘、尹文闻其风而说之。作华之冠以自表,接万物以别宥为始;语心之容,命之曰「心之行」。以聏合欢,以内。请欲置之以为主。见侮而说之。作华之冠以自表,接万物以别宥为始;语心之容,命之曰「心之行」。以聏合欢,以内。请欲置之以为主。见侮不辱,救民之斗,禁攻寝兵,救世之战。以此周行天下,上说下教。虽天下不取,强聒而不舍者也。故曰:上下见厌而强见也。然,其为人太多,其自为太少;曰:「请欲固置五升之饭足矣,先生恐不得饱,弟子虽饥,不忘天下。」日夜不休,曰:「我必得活哉!图傲乎救世之士哉!」:「君子不为苛察,不以身假物。以为无益于天下者,明之不如已也。」以禁攻兵为外,以情欲寡浅为内。其小大精粗,其行适至是而止。 公而不党,易而无私,决然无主,趣物而不两,不顾于虑,不谋于知,物无择,与之俱往,古之道术有在于是者,彭蒙、田骈、慎到闻其风而说之。齐万物以为首,曰:「天能覆之,不顾于虑,不谋于知,物无择,与之俱往,古之道术有在于是者,彭蒙、田骈、慎到闻其风而说之。齐万物以为首,曰:「天能覆之而不能载之,地能载之而不能覆之,大道能包而不能辩之。」知万物皆有所可,有所不可,故曰:「选则不遍,教则不至,道则无遗者矣。」是故慎到弃知去己,而缘不得已。泠汰于物,以为道理。曰:知不知,将薄知而后邻伤之者也。」謑髁无任,而笑天下之尚贤也;纵脱无行,而非天下之大圣;椎拍刓断,与物宛转;舍是与非,苟可以免。不师知虑,不前后,魏然而已矣。推而后行,曳而后往,若飘风之还,若羽之旋,若磨石之隧,全而无非,动静无过,未尝有是与非,苟可以免。不师知虑,不前后,魏然而已矣。推而后行,曳而后往,若飘风之还,若羽之旋,若磨石之隧,全而无非,动静无过,未尝有罪。是何故?夫无知之物,无建己之患,用之累,动静不离于理,是以终身无誉。故曰:「至于若无知之物而已,无用贤圣,夫块不失道。」豪杰相与笑之曰:「慎到之道,非生人之行,而至死人之理,得怪焉。」田骈亦然,学于彭蒙,得不教焉。彭蒙之师曰:「古之道人,至于莫之是、莫之非而已矣。其风窢而至死人之理,得怪焉。」田骈亦然,学于彭蒙,得不教焉。彭蒙之师曰:「古之道人,至于莫之是、莫之非而已矣。其风窢然,恶可而言﹖」常反人,不见观,而不免于断。其所谓道非道,而所言之韪不免于非。彭蒙、田骈、慎到不知道。虽然,概乎皆尝有闻者也。 以本为精,以物为粗,以有积为不足,淡然独与神明居。古之道术有于是者,关尹、老聃闻其风而说之,建之以常无有,主之以太一,以濡弱谦下为表,以虚不毁万物为实。关尹曰:「在己无居,形物自着。」其动若水,其静若镜,其应若。芴乎若亡,寂乎若清。同焉者和,得焉者失。未尝先人而常随人。老聃曰:「知雄,守其雌,为天下溪;知其白,守其辱,为天下谷。」人皆取先,己独取后。:「受天下之垢」。人皆取实,己独虚,无藏也故有余,岿然而有余。下谷。」人皆取先,己独取后。:「受天下之垢」。人皆取实,己独虚,无藏也故有余,岿然而有余。其行身也,徐而不费,无为也而笑巧;人皆求福,己独曲全,曰:「苟免于咎」。以深为根,以约为纪。曰:「坚则毁矣,锐挫矣」。常宽容于物,不削于人,可谓极。关尹、老聃乎﹗古之博大真人哉! 芴漠无形,变化无常,死与?生与?天地并与,神明往与﹗芒乎何之,乎何适,万物毕罗,莫足以归。古之道术有在于是者。庄周闻其风而说之,以谬悠之说,荒唐之言,死与?生与?天地并与,神明往与﹗芒乎何之,乎何适,万物毕罗,莫足以归。古之道术有在于是者。庄周闻其风而说之,以谬悠之说,荒唐之言,无端崖之辞,时恣纵而傥,不以觭见之也。以天下为沈,不可与庄语,以卮言为曼衍,以重言为真,以寓言为广。独与天地精神往来,不敖倪于万物,不谴是非,以与世俗处。其书虽瑰玮,而连犿无伤也。其辞虽参差,而諔诡可观。彼其充实,不可以已,上与造物者游,而下与外死、无终者为友。其于本也,弘大而辟,深闳而肆,其于宗也,可谓稠适而上遂矣。虽然,其应于化而解于物也,其理不竭,其来不蜕,芒乎昧乎,未之尽者。 惠施多方,其书五车,其道舛驳,其言也不中。历物之意,曰:「至大无外,谓之一;至小无内,谓之小一。无厚,不,未之尽者。 惠施多方,其书五车,其道舛驳,其言也不中。历物之意,曰:「至大无外,谓之一;至小无内,谓之小一。无厚,不可积也,其大千里。天与地卑,山与泽平,日方中方睨,物方生方死。大同而与小同异,此之谓『小同异』;万物毕同毕异,之谓『大同异』。南方无穷而有穷,今日适越而昔来。连环可解也。我知天下之央,燕之北、越之南是也。泛爱万物,天地一体也。」惠施以此为大,观于天下而晓辩者,天下之辩者相与乐之。卵有毛,鸡泛爱万物,天地一体也。」惠施以此为大,观于天下而晓辩者,天下之辩者相与乐之。卵有毛,鸡三足,有天下,犬可以为羊,有卵,丁子有尾,火不热,山出口,轮不辗地,目不见,指不至,至不绝,龟长于蛇,矩,规不可以为圆,凿不围枘,飞鸟之景未尝动也,镞矢之疾,而有不行、不止之,非犬。黄马骊牛三,白狗黑,孤驹未尝有母,一尺之捶,日取其半,万世不竭。者以此与惠施相应,终身无穷。桓团、公孙龙辩者之徒,饰人之心,易人之意,能胜人之口,不能服人之心,辩者之囿也。惠施日以其知与人之辩,特与天下辩者为怪,此其柢也。然惠施之口谈,自以为最贤,曰:「天地其壮乎,施存雄而无术。」南方有倚人焉,曰黄缭,问天地所以不坠不陷,风雨雷霆之故。施不辞而应,不虑而对,遍为万物说,说而不休,多而无已,犹以为寡,益之以怪。以反人为实,而问天地所以不坠不陷,风雨雷霆之故。施不辞而应,不虑而对,遍为万物说,说而不休,多而无已,犹以为寡,益之以怪。以反人为实,而欲以胜人为名,是以与众不适也。弱于德,强于物,其隩矣。由天地之道观惠施之能,其犹一蚊一虻之劳者也。其于物也何庸!夫充一尚可,曰愈贵道,几矣!惠施不能以此自宁,散于万物而不厌,卒以善辩为。惜乎!惠施之才,骀荡而不得,逐万物而不反,是穷响以声,与影竞走
Interpretation

There are many people throughout the world who study all kinds of arts and techniques, and each believes that what they do can be improved no further. Where, then, is the “art of the Dao” spoken of by the ancients? The answer is that the Dao is everywhere. From where do the spirits descend? From where does wisdom arise? Whatever the sages bring forth and the rulers accomplish all has its source in the unity of the Dao.

Those who do not depart from the root are called “people of Heaven”; those who do not depart from what is subtle are called “spiritual people”; those who do not depart from what is true are called “perfect people.” Those who take the Way of Heaven as their root, De as their foundation, and the Dao as their path, and who act in accord with change, are called sages. Those who show kindness through benevolence, guide conduct through righteousness, arrange behavior through ritual, harmonize people’s hearts through music, and are gentle and compassionate are called exemplary people. Officials govern public affairs by defining duties through laws and commands, marking them with titles, verifying them against actual results, making judgments through assessments, and arranging matters through numbers and systems. They make the fulfillment of duties a regular practice and regard providing people with food and clothing as fundamental. They breed livestock, store supplies, and care for the elderly, the weak, orphans, and widows, ensuring that they have support. This is how the people are governed.

The principles understood by the ancients were truly comprehensive. They worked in harmony with the spirits, enriched Heaven and Earth, nurtured the myriad things, brought harmony to the world, and bestowed their kindness on the people. They understood the fundamental principles and could also manage the smallest regulations. Throughout Heaven and Earth and the four directions, in things great and small, coarse and fine, the Dao’s operation is everywhere. Much of what could be explained through specific systems survives in old laws and histories passed down through the generations. Most scholars and educated people in the regions of Zou and Lu could explain the teachings found in the Poetry, Documents, Rites, and Music. The Poetry expresses intentions; the Documents record affairs of government; the Rites regulate conduct; Music harmonizes people’s hearts; the Changes explain the transformations of Yin-Yang; and the Spring and Autumn Annals distinguish ranks and titles. The Dao’s teachings are scattered throughout the world and are often mentioned in the various schools of the Central States.

When the world is in turmoil, the way of the worthy and the sage is no longer clear, and standards of De are no longer consistent. People each seize upon one part and consider it sufficient. Just as the eyes and ears each have their own range of sight or hearing and cannot communicate with one another, the hundred schools each have their strengths and moments of usefulness, but none can encompass everything. Each school divides up the beauty of Heaven and Earth and analyzes the principles of the myriad things, yet few can grasp the beauty of Heaven and Earth as a whole, or the totality of the spirits. Thus the way of “inner sagehood and outer kingship”—possessing sagehood within and governing the world without—grew obscure and could not flourish. People throughout the world each built a doctrine according to their own preferences. As the teachings of the hundred schools grew more distant from one another, it became difficult to return to their common source. Later scholars could no longer see the complete, undivided face of Heaven and Earth, and the art of the Dao was split apart.

Mo Di (Mozi) and Qin Guli heard one kind of art of the Dao and approved of it: they sought no luxury, wasted no goods, made no display of institutions, disciplined themselves by rules, and addressed the world’s urgent needs. They took these principles too far, yet believed that this was the way most faithful to reason. They opposed music and advocated frugality; they sang no songs in life and wore no mourning clothes after death. Mozi advocated caring for everyone equally and benefiting all, and opposed warfare. He studied diligently and was widely learned, yet rejected the rites and music of the former kings and criticized the ancient systems of ritual and music.

In ancient funeral practice, burials were regulated according to rank: the Son of Heaven used seven layers of inner and outer coffins, the feudal lords five, high officials three, and ordinary officers two. Mozi, however, held that one should make no provision for pleasure in life and wear no mourning clothes after death. He prescribed a coffin of paulownia wood only three inches thick, with no outer coffin, and took this as the standard. If his doctrine were used to teach others, it would seem to lack compassion; if practiced personally, it would indeed be hard to sustain. Mozi himself could do it, but he opposed singing even as he sang, and when mourning, did not conform to the rites of grief. He spoke about music while rejecting music. Can this really accord with human feeling? His life was harsh, his funeral rites too meager, and his doctrine so demanding that it brought sorrow and distress and was difficult to practice. To require everyone in the world to follow it would likely go against people’s hearts; the world could not bear it. Mozi could bear it himself, but what could he do for the rest of the world? By distancing himself from the people at large, he also moved far from the way of kingship.

Mozi praised Yu the Great for controlling the floods. Yu channeled the floodwaters, opened up the rivers, and connected the four quarters and the nine provinces. He went in person with tools in hand to work on the riverways, wearing away the hair on his legs as he labored, and rushing about through wind and rain. He brought peace to the world and was therefore a great sage. In later generations, many Mohist disciples wore coarse clothing and straw sandals, and labored without pause day and night. They took self-denial and hardship as their highest standard, believing that anyone unable to live this way did not follow Yu’s Way and was unworthy of being called a Mohist. Different Mohist groups argued endlessly, attacking one another with debates about “the hard and the white” and “sameness and difference.” They nominated a “Grand Master,” the Mohist leader, as a sage and competed to inherit his position; even in later times, no resolution was reached. Mozi’s intentions were good, but his methods were flawed. If later Mohists prided themselves on physical hardship and boasted to one another about it, that was a disorder within the art of governing. Even so, Mozi was truly one of the world’s rare, sincere, and good people. He pursued his ideals and did not give up when he could not attain them. He was indeed a person of talent and De.

Song Xing and Yin Wen heard another kind of art of the Dao and approved of it: they would not be entangled in worldly affairs, adorn themselves with external things, curry favor with others, or set themselves against the crowd. They hoped that the world would be at peace and that the people could live their lives; it was enough if their own needs were met, and they used this to express their convictions. They wore distinctive caps as a mark of their identity. When engaging with the myriad things, they first dispelled their preconceptions, attending to the state of the heart and the manner of action. They used gentle words to harmonize relations between people and held that this should be the foundation of governance. They did not consider it shameful to be insulted. They urged the people to stop fighting, forbade attacks, and quelled warfare in an effort to save the world from conflict. They traveled throughout the world, advising rulers above and teaching the people below. Even when the world would not accept their counsel, they continued to urge it again and again. They thought a great deal about others and very little about themselves, asking only for a meal. They worried that their teacher might not have enough to eat, while the disciples, even when hungry, did not forget the world. They hurried about day and night, hoping to help people, but often became utterly exhausted. They believed that exemplary people should not scrutinize things too closely or let themselves be controlled by external objects. If something did not benefit the world, then once this was understood, it was better to stop doing it. They regarded stopping warfare as their outward aim and reducing desires within the heart as their inner cultivation. Their efforts went more or less this far.

The art of the Dao endorsed by Peng Meng, Tian Pian, and Shen Dao called for impartiality without forming factions, simplicity without selfishness, adapting to things without clinging to fixed positions, making no prior calculations and forcing no cleverness, choosing nothing among the myriad things, and following them as they changed. They took the leveling of all things as fundamental. They held that Heaven can cover all things but cannot carry them, while Earth can carry all things but cannot cover them. The Great Dao can encompass all things, but does not distinguish them one by one. Each thing has what is acceptable about it and what is not. If one relies on choosing, one cannot be comprehensive; if one relies on instruction, one cannot bring everything to completion. Following the Dao, nothing is left out.

Shen Dao advocated abandoning self-directed cleverness and self-centeredness, adapting to what circumstances make unavoidable, and not forcibly ruling external things. He believed that knowing what one does not know allows one to avoid the harm caused by thinking one knows. He took on no responsibilities and sought to accomplish nothing, mocking the world’s reverence for the worthy. He let things be without being constrained by rules of conduct, opposing the world’s admiration for sages. Like a piece of wood being struck and shaped, he turned with things as they changed, refusing to take a stand on right and wrong and seeking only to avoid calamity. He did not rely on thought or arrange what came before and after, but seemed simply to move with the situation. Such a person was like an object without awareness, free from the trouble of establishing a self and unburdened by usefulness. In movement and stillness alike, he did not violate the principles of things, and so he could not be said to have any reputation in life. Therefore he said that it was enough for a person to become something like an object without awareness; there was no need deliberately to employ the worthy and the sages. Even a clod of earth would not stray from the Dao.

The bold and outstanding mocked him, saying that Shen Dao’s principles were not those of a living person but of a dead thing, which was truly strange. Tian Pian was much the same. He studied under Peng Meng, but what he learned was “not to teach.” Peng Meng’s teacher said that those who sought the Dao in ancient times went only so far as not to cling to judgments of right and wrong. Such a way was empty and nearly lifeless; how could it explain anything? They always acted contrary to convention and would not allow others to observe them, yet could not escape criticism. The Dao they spoke of was not necessarily the true Dao, and even what they called correct words could not be free of error. Peng Meng, Tian Pian, and Shen Dao did not truly understand the Dao, but they had at least heard something of its principles.

The art of the Dao endorsed by Guan Yin and Lao Dan (Laozi) took the root as its essence and particular things as its coarse aspects. It held that accumulating external things was insufficient, and quietly dwelt alone with the spirits. It made “constant nonbeing” its foundation—the state of abiding in Wuwei and stillness—and “the Great One” its central principle. Its outward expression was softness and humility; its practical substance was emptiness and stillness that did no harm to the myriad things.

Guan Yin said, “When the heart does not cling to any fixed view, the forms of things reveal themselves naturally.” In action, he was like water; in stillness, like a mirror; in responding to external things, like an echo. He was indistinct, seeming both present and absent, quiet yet clear. By becoming one with the myriad things, one could live in harmony with them; by insisting on possession, one would lose them. He never rushed ahead of others, but always followed their lead.

Lao Dan said, “Know what is strong, yet keep to what is weak, and you will become the ravine of the world. Know what is bright, yet keep to what is dark, and you will become the valley of the world.” While others contended to be first, he was willing to remain behind. While others sought fame, he was willing to bear the world’s disgrace. While others sought fullness, he alone remained empty. Because he did not store or possess things, he seemed always to have more than enough. He met the world calmly, without exhausting his strength or boasting of cleverness. While others pursued good fortune, he sought only to preserve himself by yielding, thereby avoiding misfortune. He took depth as his root and simplicity as his rule. He believed that whatever is too hard will break, and whatever is too sharp will be blunted. He made room for all things and did not set out to weaken others. One could say that he had reached the utmost. Guan Yin and Lao Dan were truly great and open-minded people of ancient times.

The art of the Dao endorsed by Zhuang Zhou (Zhuangzi) was deep and still, without fixed form, and changed without following any constant pattern. Was it dead or alive? Did it exist alongside Heaven and Earth, or move with the spirits? It stretched everywhere without a fixed direction, containing the myriad things, yet there was no single place to which it could be wholly reduced. Zhuang Zhou expressed it through distant and unusual stories, expansive and unconstrained language, and arguments without limit. At times he spoke freely and expansively, refusing to view things from only one perspective. He believed that the world was stagnant and confused and that serious, constrained speech was unsuited to it. So he used “goblet words”—speech that pours out according to the shape of its vessel—to unfold his meaning; “weighty words,” which draw authority from the ancients or other respected sources; and parables to extend his expression.

Zhuang Zhou alone roamed in spirit with Heaven and Earth. He did not look down on the myriad things or condemn right and wrong, but lived alongside the world. His writings were strange and wondrous, yet flowed coherently and did not suffer from rigid attachment. His words shifted and varied, uncanny yet captivating. His thought was abundant and inexhaustible. Above, he traveled with the creator; below, he made friends with those who transcended life and death, with what had no beginning or end. His understanding of the Dao’s root was vast and profound; his grasp of its central principle was thorough and far-reaching. Even so, his way of responding to change and freeing himself from the bonds of external things was still inexhaustible, so deep and subtle that it could not be fully expressed.

Hui Shi, a leading figure of the School of Names, had broad knowledge and wrote many books, but his doctrines were tangled and his arguments often missed the point. He examined things and proposed a series of propositions: what is greatest has no outside and is called the “Great One”; what is smallest has no inside and is called the “Small One.” Something without thickness cannot be piled up, yet can extend for a thousand miles. Heaven and Earth are equally low; mountains and marshes are equally level. When the sun has just reached midday, it is already declining; when things have just begun to grow, they are already moving toward decay. Comparing the greatest similarity with the smallest similarity may be called “small similarity and difference”; saying that all things are entirely the same and entirely different may be called “great similarity and difference.” The south is both boundless and bounded. One may set out today for Yue and say that one arrived yesterday. Joined rings can be separated. The center of the world lies north of Yan and south of Yue. Hui Shi advocated universal love for all things and held that Heaven, Earth, and the myriad things were originally one.

Hui Shi took pride in such arguments as signs of his brilliance, and debaters throughout the world were eager to dispute with him. They proposed such strange claims as “eggs have hair,” “a chicken has three feet,” and “a dog can be counted as a sheep.” They also debated whether fire is hot, whether mountains can speak, whether wheels touch the ground, and whether the eyes can see. Questions such as “the shadow of a flying bird never moves” and “a one-foot-long stick, cut in half each day, will never be used up” were enough to keep people arguing throughout their lives. Debaters such as Huan Tuan and Gongsun Long were skilled at unsettling people’s minds and changing their views. They could defeat others in words, but could not truly convince their hearts. This was the limitation of the debaters.

Every day, Hui Shi used his cleverness to argue with others, especially enjoying disputes with debaters throughout the world over strange propositions. He considered himself the most intelligent, yet lacked the art of the Dao. When Nanfang Huangliao asked why Heaven and Earth did not fall or collapse, and why wind, rain, thunder, and lightning occurred, Hui Shi answered at once and explained the myriad things without stopping. The more he spoke, the less satisfied he became, adding one strange claim after another. He treated what went against common sense as real and made defeating others his reputation, so he could not get along with people. Seen from the perspective of the Dao of Heaven and Earth, Hui Shi’s abilities were like the toil of mosquitoes and gnats. What practical use were they to the myriad things? If Hui Shi had devoted himself to a single pursuit, that might have been acceptable; if he had gone further and honored the Dao, he might have come close to the right path. Sadly, he could not rest in this way. He kept scattering his thoughts across the myriad things, and in the end took skill in argument as his sole ability. His talent ran wild but could not return to the root. He chased after the myriad things like someone pursuing an echo with a sound, or racing a shadow. It was lamentable.

也。悲!

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 3