中文 · EN

《南華真經》Vol. 7

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 7 / 10 10,766 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經》 Vol. 7 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 24 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

生第十九 達 生之情者不務生之所無以爲達 命之情 者不務知 之所無奈何養形必先之以物 物有 餘而形不養者有之矣 有生必先無離形形 不離而生 亡者有之矣生之來 不能却其去 不能止悲夫世 之人以爲養形足以存生而 養形 果不足以存生則世奚足爲哉 雖不足 爲而不可不爲者其爲不免 矣夫欲 免爲形 者莫如弃世棄世則無累無累則正 平正平 則與彼更生更生則幾矣 事奚足弃而生奚 足遺 弃事則形不勞遺生則精不虧夫形 全 精復與天爲一天地者萬物之父母 也合則 成體散則成始 形精不虧是謂能移精而又 精 反以相天子列子問關尹曰 至人潜行不 窒 蹈火不熱行乎萬物之上而不慄 請問何 以至於此關尹曰是純 氣之守也非知巧果 敢之列居予語汝凡有 貌象聲色者皆物也 物與物何以相遠 夫奚足以至 乎先是色而 已則物之造 乎不形而止乎無所化夫得是
Interpretation

Those who comprehend the true meaning of life do not pursue useless things beyond life's essence; those who understand the nature of destiny do not force what lies beyond their cognitive grasp. To nurture the body, material conditions are necessary first, yet there are cases where material abundance fails to preserve health. Life cannot exist without form, yet there are instances where the form remains intact while life is lost. When life comes, it cannot be refused; when it departs, it cannot be detained. How lamentable! Ordinary people believe that preserving the body means preserving life, but since maintaining the body is truly insufficient to retain life, what meaning do all worldly efforts hold? Though these efforts ultimately prove futile, they cannot be avoided—this is the inescapable fate.

To transcend the constraints of physical form, the best method is to relinquish worldly attachments. Without worldly burdens, there is no heaviness; without heaviness, the mind becomes tranquil and harmonious; with tranquility, one renews alongside nature. Reaching this state brings one closer to the Dao. Why let go of mundane affairs? Why view life and death with detachment? By relinquishing worldly concerns, the body is spared exhaustion; by detaching from life and death, the spirit (Shen) avoids depletion. When the body is whole and the spirit vibrant, one merges with nature as a single unity. Heaven and Earth are the parents of all things—when the dual energies of Yin-Yang combine, life is formed; when they disperse, all returns to the source. Those who can preserve both form and spirit without damage gradually ascend in attainment, ultimately reaching a state of refined purity that in turn aids the transformations of nature.

Liezi (a Daoist master) asked Guan Yin (disciple of Laozi): "Those who have attained the Dao can submerge in water without drowning, tread fire without burning, and walk upon all things without fear. How is this achieved?" Guan Yin replied: "This comes from guarding the pure, authentic Qi—it cannot be reached through cleverness or brute strength. Let me explain: All that has form, sound, or color belongs to the realm of concrete things. What significant difference can exist between such things? How could they possibly lead to the highest state? The true Dao arises from formlessness and halts where there is no change. Only by grasping this root..."

而窮之 者物焉得而止焉彼將處 乎不淫之 度而藏乎無端之紀 遊乎萬物之所終始壹 其性 養其氣合其德以通乎物 之所造夫若 是者其天守全其神 無郤物奚自入焉夫醉 者之墜車雖疾不死 骨節與人同而犯害與 人異其神全也乘亦 不知也墜亦不知也死 生驚懼不入乎其胸 中是故選物而不慴彼 得全於酒而猶若是 而沉 得全於天乎聖人 藏於天故莫之能傷也 復讎者不折鏌干 雖 有忮心者不怨飄瓦是以天 下均 平故無攻 戰之亂 無殺戮之刑者由此道也不開人之 天而開天之天 開天者德生 開人者賊生不 厭其天 不忽於人民 幾乎以其眞 仲尼適楚 出於林中見痀僂者承蜩猶掇 之也仲尼曰 子巧乎有道邪曰我有道也五 六月累丸二 而不墜則失者錙銖累 三而不墜 則失者十 一累五而不墜猶掇之也 吾處身也若橛株 拘吾執臂也若 槁木之技 雖天地之大萬物 之多而唯 蜩翼之知吾不反不側不以萬物 易蜩之翼 何爲而不得孔子顧謂弟子曰用
Interpretation

Those who obsessively pursue external things will never attain true stillness. Those who have attained the Dao abide in harmonious moderation, dwell in the endlessness of eternity, and wander through the source where all things arise and perish. They preserve the purity of their innate nature, nurture their vital Qi, and align with the De (Virtue/Power) of nature, thereby penetrating the origin of creation. Such people can preserve their heavenly nature with spirit intact—how could external things disturb them?

Consider a drunkard who falls from a carriage: though injured, he doesn't die. His bones are no different from others', yet his injuries differ precisely because his Shen (spirit) remains whole. When riding, he's unaware of riding; when falling, unaware of falling. With no thoughts of life, death, or fear in his heart, he meets accidents without terror. If mere drunkenness can preserve one's spirit, how much more so aligning with the heavenly Dao? The sage dwells within nature's Dao—thus no external thing can harm him.

One seeking vengeance won't break his enemy's sword; one harboring resentment won't blame a tile that accidentally falls. If all under heaven maintained such equanimity, there would be no wars, chaos, or executions. Don't cling to artificial cleverness—instead awaken your heavenly nature. Following nature generates De (Virtue/Power), while forcing things breeds calamity. By neither opposing nature's Dao nor disregarding people's needs, you approach true nature.

When Confucius traveled to Chu, he saw a hunchback catching cicadas with a bamboo pole as easily as picking them up. Confucius asked: "Such skill—what's your secret?" The old man replied: "I have a method. After five or six months of practice, I could balance two pellets atop my pole without dropping them—then I rarely missed cicadas. With three pellets steady, I'd fail only once in ten attempts. When five pellets stayed balanced, it became like simply gathering them. I stand as steady as a tree stump, hold my pole as still as dead wood. Though heaven and earth are vast with countless things, I focus solely on cicada wings—never glancing aside, never distracted. How could I not succeed?" Confucius told his disciples: "Concentrated willpower can achieve divine skill."

志 不分乃凝於神其痀僂文人之謂乎顔淵 問 仲尼曰吾嘗濟乎觴深之淵津人操舟若 神 吾問焉曰操舟可學邪曰可善游者數能 若 乃夫 没人則未嘗見舟而便操之 也吾問 焉而不吾告敢問何謂也仲尼 曰善游者數 能忘水也若乃夫没 人之未嘗見舟而便操 之也彼視淵若陵視 舟之覆猶其車却也 覆 却萬方陳乎前 而不得入其舍惡往而 不暇 以瓦注者巧以鉤注 者憚以黄金注者殙 其 巧一也而有所矜則重 外也凡外重者内拙 田開 之見周威公威公曰吾聞祝腎學生 吾 子 與祝腎遊亦何聞焉田開之曰閑之操拔 篲 以侍門庭亦何聞於夫子威公曰田子無 讓 寡人願聞之開之曰聞之夫子曰善養生 者 若牧羊然視其後者而鞭之威公曰何謂 也 田開之曰魯有單豹者巖居而水飲不與 民 共利行年七十而猶有嬰兒之色不幸遇 餓 虎餓虎殺而食之有張毅者高門縣薄無 不 走也行年四十而有内熱之病以死豹養 其 内而虎食其外毅養其外而病攻其内此 二 子者皆不鞭其後者也 仲尼 曰無入而藏 無出而陽 柴立其中央 三者若得其名必極 夫畏塗者十殺 一人則父子兄弟相戒也必 盛卒徒而後敢 出焉不亦知乎人之所取畏 者袵席之上飲 食之間而不知爲之戒者過 也
Interpretation

This passage comes from the Zhuangzi·Mastering Life chapter, conveying wisdom about mental focus and the Dao of nurturing life.

A hunchbacked old man catching cicadas with a bamboo pole moved with such precision it seemed as simple as picking things up. When Yan Hui asked Confucius about the secret, Confucius illustrated with three examples: skilled swimmers learn to row boats quickly because they understand water's nature; divers can handle boats without prior experience because they perceive deep waters as level ground. When betting with pottery shards, one's movements are deft; with silver hooks comes nervousness; with golden stakes, the mind grows muddled—the skill remains the same, but the more one values external objects, the clumsier the inner self becomes.

When Tian Kaizhi met Duke Wei of Zhou, he relayed his teacher's analogy about nurturing life: it's like shepherding sheep where you whip the lagging ones. Shan Bao of Lu lived reclusively by mountain streams drinking spring water—at seventy his complexion remained childlike, yet he was devoured by a starving tiger. Zhang Yi bustled about currying favor with the powerful, only to die at forty from internal fever disorders. Both men were like shepherds who failed to whip the stragglers, each stubbornly clinging to one extreme.

Confucius distilled the essence of nurturing life: neither withdraw excessively nor display too conspicuously—stand centered like withered wood. People know to travel together on dangerous paths, yet remain unaware that the true perils lie in bedchamber excesses and dietary indulgences—these are life's genuine hazards.

祝宗人玄端以臨牢筴說彘曰汝奚 惡死 吾將三月㹖汝十日戒三日齊藉白茅 加汝 肩尻乎彫俎之上則汝爲之乎爲彘謀 曰不 如食以糠糟而錯之牢筴之中自爲謀 則荀 生有軒冕之尊死得於腞楯之上聚僂 之中 則爲之爲彘謀則去之自爲謀則取之 所異 彘者何也 桓公田於澤管仲御見鬼焉 公撫 管仲之手曰仲父何見對曰臣無所見 公反 誒詒爲病數日不出齊士有里子告敖 者曰 公則自傷鬼惡能傷公夫忿滀之氣散 而不 反則爲不足上而不下則使人善怒下 而不 上則使人善忘不上不下中身當心則 爲病 桓公曰然則有鬼乎曰有沈有履竈有 髻户 内之煩壤雷霆處之東北方之下者倍 阿鮭 蠪躍之西北方之下者則泆陽處之水 有罔 象丘有崒山有夔野有方皇澤有委蛇 公曰 請問委蛇之狀何如皇子曰委蛇其大 如轂 其長如轅紫衣而朱冠其爲物也惡聞 雷車 之聲則捧其首而立見之者殆乎霸桓 公辴 然而笑曰此寡人之所見者也於是正 衣冠 與之坐不終日而不知病之去也 紀渻子爲 王養鬭雞十日而問 雞已乎曰未也方虚憍 而恃氣十日又問曰 未也猶應嚮景十日又 問曰未也猶疾視而 盛氣十日又問曰幾矣 雞雖有鳴者已無變 矣望之似木雞矣其德 全矣異雞無敢應者 反走矣
Interpretation

This passage from the Zhuangzi (also known as Nanhua Zhenjing, the True Classic of Southern Florescence) contains two parables that embody the Daoist philosophy of following nature's course.

The first story features a ritual officer addressing a sacrificial pig in ceremonial robes. The officer asks if the pig fears death, promising three months of fine feeding followed by ten days of purification (zhaijiao), three days of ritual bathing, placement upon sacred white reeds, and final offering on carved vessels. Yet from the pig's perspective, it would prefer eating simple fodder in its pen. Zhuangzi contrasts this with human behavior—people chase high carriages and official caps in life, then elaborate coffins and lavish funerals in death. This reveals humanity's hypocritical double standards in judging others versus ourselves.

The second anecdote tells of Duke Huan of Qi encountering a ghost during a hunt. After claiming to see a specter in the marshes, the duke falls ill with fright. The sage Huangzi Gao explains: while ghosts exist, true harm comes from stagnant Qi (vital energy). When Qi congests in the body's center (Dantian), illness follows. Huangzi describes various spirits, particularly the "Coiling Serpent" ghost that hates thunder chariots—seeing it foretells rulership. Upon recognizing this as the apparition he encountered, the duke laughs heartily and instantly recovers, illustrating how many ailments stem from psychological causes.

The third narrative follows Ji Shengzi training fighting cocks for King Xuan of Zhou. After forty days, when a rooster remains unmoved by others' challenges—standing like a "wooden fowl" in perfect calm—Ji declares its training complete. Indeed, other roosters flee without confrontation. This exemplifies the Daoist ideal of "great wisdom appearing foolish"—true strength needs no bluster, embodying the principle of Wuwei (non-action) through supreme self-possession.

孔子觀於吕梁 縣水三十仞流沫四十里 黿鼉魚鼈之所不 能游也見一丈夫游之以 爲有苦而欲死也 使弟子並流而拯之數百 步而出被髮行歌 而游於塘下孔子從而問 焉曰吾以子爲鬼 察子則人也請問蹈水有 道乎曰亡吾無道 吾始乎故長乎性成乎命 與齊俱入與汩偕 出 從水之道而不爲私焉此吾所以蹈 之也 孔子曰何謂始乎故長乎性成乎命曰 吾生 於陵而安於陵故也長於水而安於水 性也 不知吾所以然而然命 也梓慶削 木爲鐻鐻 成見者驚猶鬼神 魯侯見而問 焉曰子何術 以爲焉對曰臣工人何術之有 雖然有一焉 臣將爲鐻未嘗敢以耗氣也必 齊以靜心齊 三日而不敢懷慶賞爵禄齊五 日不敢懷非 譽巧拙齊七日輒然忘吾有四 枝形體也當 是時也無公朝 其巧專而外 滑消然後入山 林觀天性形軀至矣然後 成見鐻然後加手 焉不然則已 則以天合天器之所以疑神 者 其是與東野稷以 御見莊公進退中繩左右 旋中規莊公以爲 文弗過也使之鉤百而反 顔闔遇之人見曰 稷之馬將敗公密而不應少 焉果敗而反公 曰子何以知之曰其馬力竭矣 而猶求焉故 曰敗 工倕旋而蓋規矩指與物 化而不以心稽 故其靈臺一而不桎
Interpretation

Confucius was observing the waterfalls at Lüliang when he saw a cascade plunging thirty ren (about 45 meters), its torrents churning for forty li—so violent that even turtles and crocodiles couldn't navigate it. Suddenly, he spotted a man swimming in the rapids. Thinking the man was in distress and seeking death, Confucius instructed his disciples to follow the current and rescue him. Yet the man emerged several hundred paces downstream, his hair loose, singing as he strolled leisurely along the riverbank.

Confucius approached and asked, "At first, I took you for a ghost, but on closer look, you're human. May I ask if you have a special method for swimming?" The man replied, "No method at all. I began by adapting to the water's nature, grew by following my own innate tendencies, and ultimately achieved complete harmony with the flow. I dive with the whirlpools and rise with the surges, wholly obeying the water's way without imposing my own will—that is my swimming."

Confucius pressed further, "What do you mean by 'beginning with adaptation, growing through innate tendencies, and perfecting through natural harmony'?" The man explained, "Born among hills, I became at ease with land—that's adaptation. Raised by water, I grew accustomed to its flow—that's innate tendency. Without realizing it, I swam this well—that's natural harmony."

Next came the story of Zi Qing, a craftsman from Lu who made exquisite chimes (ancient musical instruments). His work was so flawless that people suspected divine intervention. When the Marquis of Lu asked his secret, Zi Qing replied, "What secret could a mere craftsman have? But there is this: Before crafting, I fast and still my mind. After three days, I forget rewards and rank; after five, I disregard praise or blame; after seven, I lose all awareness of my body. By then, even the court fades from mind. With single-minded focus, I enter the forest to select wood, working only when I find material perfectly suited by nature. Thus, when a natural mind meets natural material, the result seems divinely aided."

Then there was Dongye Ji, a master charioteer who performed for Duke Zhuang of Lu. His chariot moved straight as an inked line, turned as precisely as a compass. The duke thought even Zaofu (legendary charioteer) couldn't surpass him and ordered him to complete a hundred laps. Yan He, a wise man, predicted, "Dongye Ji's horses will collapse." The duke remained silent, and soon the horses indeed fell exhausted. Asked how he knew, Yan He replied, "Their strength spent, yet driven further—collapse was inevitable."

Lastly, the legendary craftsman Gong Chui could draw freehand circles surpassing compass precision, his fingers adapting without thought, his mind unified and unconstrained. These stories all illustrate: aligning with nature's patterns, focusing the spirit without force, leads to transcendent mastery.

忘足履 之適也忘要帶 之適也知忘是非 心之適也 不内變不外從事會之 適也始乎適而未嘗 不適者忘 適之適也有孫休者踵門而詫子 扁慶子曰休居鄕不見謂不修臨難不見謂 不勇然而田原不遇歲事君不遇世賔於鄕 里逐於州部則胡罪乎天哉休惡遇此命也 扁子曰子獨不聞夫至人之自行邪忘其肝 膽遺其耳目 芒然彷徨乎塵垢之外 逍遥乎 無事之業 是謂爲而不恃長 而不宰今汝飾 知以 驚愚修身以明汙昭昭乎若揭日月而 行也 汝得全而形軀具而九竅無中道天於 聾盲 跛蹇而比於人數亦幸矣又何暇乎天 之怨 哉子往矣孫子出扁子入坐有間仰天 而歎 弟子問曰先生何爲歎乎扁子曰向者 休來 吾告之以至人之德吾恐其驚而遂至 於惑 也弟子曰不然孫子之所言是邪先生 之所 言非邪非固不能惑是孫子所言非邪 先生 所言是邪彼固惑而來矣又奚罪焉扁 子曰 不然昔者有爲止於魯郊魯君悦之爲 具太 牢以饗之奏九韶以樂之鳥乃始憂悲 眩視 不敢飲食此之謂以己養養鳥也若夫 以鳥 養養鳥者宜棲之深林浮之江湖食之 以委 蛇則平陸而已矣 今休款啓寡聞之民 也吾告以至人 之德譬之若載鼷以車馬樂 鴳以鐘鼓也彼 又惡能無驚乎哉     外篇山木第二十
Interpretation

This passage discusses the realm and attitude of the Daoist "Perfect Man" (zhiren), one who has attained the highest level of cultivation. A man named Sun Xiu came complaining about the unfairness of fate, and Bian Qingzi used the Perfect Man's state to enlighten him.

The Perfect Man can forget the existence of his physical form—he doesn't even notice whether his shoes fit or his belt feels comfortable. Transcending distinctions of right and wrong, his mind remains naturally tranquil and at ease. Neither driven by internal desires nor burdened by external things, he perpetually abides in a state of spontaneous ease. This realm—where one forgets even the very notion of "comfort"—represents true freedom.

Bian Qingzi told Sun Xiu: "You constantly parade your intelligence and virtue through the villages, flaunting them as conspicuously as carrying the sun and moon through the marketplace. Yet simply having intact limbs and features is already great fortune—what right have you to complain about fate?"

After Sun Xiu departed, Bian Qingzi explained to his disciples: "Speaking to him about the Perfect Man's state was like transporting a tiny mouse in a grand carriage or entertaining small birds with bells and drums—it only frightened him. It recalls how someone once tried to entertain a seabird with the grandest sacrificial offerings of the Tailao ceremony and the refined music of the 'Nine Shao,' only to terrify the creature. To properly nurture a bird, one should let it perch in forests, roam rivers and lakes, and eat its accustomed foods."

Through these contrasts, the text illustrates how true cultivation means following one's natural disposition rather than deliberate posturing. The Perfect Man attains the highest state precisely through "forgetting the self"—by not forcibly pursuing anything, he gains genuine freedom. Ordinary people who strain to achieve the Perfect Man's realm will only produce the opposite effect.

莊子行於山中見大木枝葉盛茂伐木者止 其旁而不取也問其故曰無所可用莊子曰 此木以不材得終其天年夫子出於山舍於 故人之家故人喜命竪子殺鴈而烹之竪子 請曰其一能鳴其一不能鳴請奚殺主人曰 殺不能鳴者明日弟子問於莊子曰昨日山 中之木以不材得終其天年今主人之鴈以 不材死先生將何處莊子笑曰周將處夫材 與不材之間材與不材之間似之而非也故 未免乎累 若夫乘道德而 浮遊則不然無譽 無訾一龍一蛇與時俱化 而無肯專爲一上 一下以和爲量浮遊乎 萬物之祖物物而不 物於物則胡可得而 累邪此神農黄帝之法 則也 若夫萬物之情人 倫之傳則不然合則 離成則毁廉則挫尊 則議有爲則虧賢則謀 不肖則欺故可得 而必乎哉悲夫弟子志之 其唯道德之鄕乎 市南宜僚見 魯侯魯侯有 憂色市南子曰君有憂色何也 魯侯曰吾學 先王之道修先君之業吾敬鬼 尊賢親而行 之無須史離居然不免於患吾 是以憂市南 子曰君之除患之術淺矣 夫豐狐文 豹棲於 山林伏於巖穴靜也夜行晝居戒也 雖飢渴 隱約猶且胥䟽於江湖之上而求食 焉定也 然且不免於罔羅機辟之患是何罪 之有哉 其皮爲之灾也今魯國獨非君之皮 邪吾願 君刳形去皮灑心去欲而遊於無人 之野
Interpretation

Zhuangzi was walking through the mountains when he came upon a luxuriant tree. Woodcutters had stopped beside it but left it uncut. When asked why, they replied the tree was useless. Zhuangzi sighed: "This tree survives to fulfill its natural lifespan precisely because of its worthlessness."

Later, visiting an old friend's home, the host joyfully ordered a servant to kill a goose for dinner. The servant asked: "One goose can honk, the other cannot—which should we kill?" The master said: "Kill the silent one." The next day, a puzzled disciple asked: "The mountain tree was spared for being useless, yet the goose died for the same reason—how should you position yourself, Master?"

Zhuangzi smiled: "I'd dwell between usefulness and uselessness. Yet this compromise still has limitations. If one wanders in harmony with the Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue), such dilemmas vanish—neither chasing praise nor fearing slander, soaring like a dragon one moment, hiding like a snake the next, adapting without fixation. Harmonizing all extremes, roaming freely in the source of all things. Mastering objects without being enslaved by them—how could burdens arise? This was the way of Shennong and the Yellow Emperor."

He then lamented life's patterns: unions end in separation, success in ruin, integrity invites suppression, nobility attracts slander, action begets loss, wisdom draws schemes, while incompetence suffers abuse. Why cling to these? Zhuangzi urged disciples to remember: only returning to the realm of Dao and De is true home.

In another story, Shi Nan Yiliao noticed the Duke of Lu looking troubled. The Duke said: "I study the ways of ancient kings, continue ancestral traditions, revere spirits, honor sages—never slackening—yet calamities persist." Shi Nanzi observed: "Your method to dispel worries is superficial. Like magnificent foxes and leopards hiding by day, hunting cautiously at night, starving yet avoiding humans—still they fall to traps. Their beautiful fur becomes their doom. Isn't Lu your 'fur' now? I advise shedding form, abandoning desires, wandering the people-less wilderness."

(Note: "Dao and De" refer to the core Taoist concepts of the fundamental principle and its manifest virtue; the "people-less wilderness" symbolizes transcendent spiritual freedom beyond worldly attachments.)

南 越有 邑焉名爲建德之國其民愚 而朴少私 而寡欲知作而不知藏與而不求 其報不知 義之所適不知禮之所將猖狂妄 行乃蹈乎 大方 其生可樂其死可葬吾願君去 國捐俗 與道相輔而行君 曰彼其道遠而險又有江 山我無舟車奈何 市南子曰君無形倨 無留 居 以爲君車 君曰彼其道幽遠而無人吾誰 與爲鄰吾 無糧我無食安得而至焉市南子 曰少君之 費寡君之欲雖無糧而乃足 君其 涉於江而浮於海望之而不見其 崖愈往而 不知其所窮送君者皆自 崖而反君自此遠 矣 故有人者累見有於人者憂 故堯非有人 非見有於人也 吾願去君之累除君之憂而 獨與 道遊於大莫之國方舟 而濟於河有虚 舡來觸舟雖有褊心之人不 怒有一人在其 上則呼張歙之一呼而不聞 再呼而不聞於 是三呼邪則必以惡聲隨之 向也不怒而今 也怒向也虚而今也實人能 虚己以遊世其 孰能害之 北宫奢爲衛靈公賦斂以爲鍾爲 壇 乎郭門之外三月而成土下之縣王子慶 忌 見而問焉曰子何術之設奢曰一之間無 敢 設也 奢聞之旣彫旣琢復歸於朴侗乎 其 無識儻 乎其怠疑萃乎芒乎其送往而 迎來
Interpretation

In the south lies a land called Jiande, where people are simple and guileless, with few selfish thoughts and minimal desires. They know how to labor but not how to hoard; they delight in giving without seeking repayment. Unaware of rigid moral codes or elaborate rituals, they live freely yet align effortlessly with the Dao (the Way). In life they are joyful and unburdened; in death they are peacefully laid to rest.

I wish you would cast aside your royal status, abandon worldly entanglements, and journey with the Great Dao. Yet you protest: "That path is too distant and perilous, blocked by mountains and rivers—how can I go without chariot or boat?" The Sage of the South replies: "Simply relinquish your noble airs and cease clinging to possessions—this is your finest vehicle." You fret further: "That road is desolate—who will accompany me? Without provisions, how shall I survive?" The sage answers: "Reduce expenditures, temper desires, and even without stores, you will have enough."

When you sail across the ocean, those seeing you off will turn back once your vessel disappears into the horizon, while you voyage ever onward. Thus, to govern others is a burden; to be served by others is a sorrow. The greatness of Emperor Yao lay precisely in neither governing others nor being served by them.

I seek to relieve you of these burdens so you may wander alone with the Dao through vast wilderness. When two boats cross a river side by side, if an empty vessel drifts into yours, even the most hot-tempered man won’t rage. But if he sees someone aboard, he’ll shout reprimands. Why anger at the latter but not the former? Because emptiness is insubstantial, while presence is concrete. If one can move through the world with such unimpeded openness, who could harm him?

When Beigong She raised funds for Duke Ling of Wei to cast ceremonial bells, he built a platform outside the city gates and completed the tiered chime sets in three months. Prince Qingji asked what extraordinary method he’d employed. Beigong replied: "I used no technique at all." He had heard it said: "All carved artifacts must return to simplicity." Abiding in primordial chaos—neither knowing nor not knowing—he gathered all in hazy unity, receiving and sending forth until the work fulfilled itself.

來者勿禁往者勿 止從其强梁隨其曲 傳因 其自窮 故朝夕賦斂而毫毛不挫而況 有大 塗者乎 孔子圍於陳蔡之間七日不火食太 公任往弔之曰子幾死乎曰然子惡死乎曰 然任曰子 嘗言不死之 道東海有鳥焉其名 曰意怠其爲鳥也翂翂翐 翐而似無能引援 而飛迫脅而棲 進不敢爲前退不敢爲後食 不 敢先嘗必取其緒是故其行 列不斥而外 人卒不得 害是以免於患直 木先伐甘井先 竭子其意者飾知以驚 愚修身以明汙昭昭 乎如揭日月而行故不 免也 昔吾聞之大成 之人曰自伐者無功功成者 隳名成者虧孰 能去 功與名而還與衆人道流而 不明居得 行而不名處 純純常常乃比於狂 削迹捐勢 不爲功名 是故無責於人人亦無責焉 至人 不聞子何喜哉孔子 曰善哉辭其交遊去其 弟子逃於大澤衣裘 褐食杼栗入 獸不亂群 入鳥不亂行鳥獸 不惡而況人乎 孔子問子 桑雩曰吾再逐於魯伐樹於宋削 迹於衛窮 於商周圍於陳蔡之間吾犯此數 患親交益 疏徒友益散何與子桑雩曰子獨 不聞假人 之亡與林回棄千金之璧負赤子 而趨或曰 爲其布與赤子之布寡矣 爲其累與赤子之 累多矣棄千金之璧負赤子而趨何也林回 曰彼以利合此以天屬也夫以利合者迫窮
Interpretation

This passage from the Zhuangzi (also known as Nanhua Zhenjing, the True Classic of Southern Florescence) employs dialogues between Confucius and various characters to expound the Daoist wisdom of "non-action" (Wuwei) and "non-contention."

When Confucius was besieged between Chen and Cai without warm food for seven days, Taigong Ren came to console him. Taigong Ren shared a fable: In the Eastern Sea lives a bird called Yidai that flies clumsily and slowly, never rushing ahead. It waits for other birds to eat first and thus never faces rejection from its kind, nor harm from predators. This mirrors how straight trees are felled first and sweet well water is drawn dry. You, Confucius, dazzle others with your brilliance to intimidate the ignorant and cultivate yourself to highlight others' flaws, shining as conspicuously as the sun and moon—inevitably inviting misfortune.

The ancients who attained the Dao (Dao) said: "Those who boast achieve no true merit; fame and success invite downfall." Who can relinquish reputation and return to simplicity? Those who embody the Dao act without leaving traces, appearing dull yet harboring great wisdom. They seek no fame or merit, thus facing no worldly blame or opposition.

Deeply moved, Confucius resolved to withdraw from society, retreat to the mountains, wear coarse cloth, and eat wild fruits. Living harmoniously with birds and beasts, he would naturally avoid human resentment. Later, he asked Zisang Hu why he repeatedly faced adversity. Zisang Hu recounted the story of Lin Hui abandoning jade to save a child: "Relationships based on profit dissolve in hardship, while bonds rooted in innate nature grow stronger in crisis." This implied Confucius's ties were utilitarian and thus fragile.

Through these parables, the text illustrates how flaunting wisdom and chasing fame invite disaster, while apparent foolishness and non-contention preserve one's being. True connections stem from innate nature, not gain. This embodies the Daoist ideals of "non-action" (Wuwei) and "blending with the dusty world."

禍患害相棄也以天屬者迫窮禍患害相收 也夫相收之與相棄亦遠矣且君子之交淡 若水小人之交甘若醴君子淡以親小人甘 以絶彼無故以合 者則無故 以離 孔子曰敬 聞命 矣徐行翔佯而歸絶學捐書弟子無挹 於前 其愛益加進異 日桑雩又曰舜之將死 眞冷禹曰汝戒之哉 形莫若縁情莫若率 縁 則不 離率則不勞不離不勞則不 求文以待 形不求文以待形固不待 物莊子衣大布而 補之正縻係履而過 魏王魏王曰何先生之 憊邪莊子曰貧也非 憊也士有道德不能行 憊也衣弊履穿貧也 非憊也此所謂非遭時 也王獨不見夫騰猿 乎其得柟梓豫章也攬 蔓其枝而王長其間 雖羿逄蒙不能睥睨也 及其得柘棘枳枸之間也危行 側視振動悼 慄此筋骨非有加急而不柔也 處勢不便未 足以逞其能也今處昏上亂相 之間而欲無 憊奚可得邪此比干之見剖心 徵也夫 孔子 窮於陳 蔡之間七日不火食左據槁木右擊 槁枝而 歌猋氏之風有其具而無其數有其 聲而無 宫角木聲與人聲犁然有當於人之 心顔回 端拱還目而窺之仲尼恐其廣己而 造大也 愛己而造哀也曰回無受天損易 無 受人益 難無始而非卒也 人與天一也夫今 之歌 者其誰乎回曰敢問無受天損 易仲尼
Interpretation

This passage comes from the Nanhua Zhenjing (the Zhuangzi), which illustrates the art of living through several stories.

When calamity strikes, even blood relatives may abandon each other, while those whose natures resonate will aid one another. The friendship between noble persons is as clear as water—plain yet enduring, whereas the bond between petty people resembles sweet wine—intense but easily broken. Those who unite without reason will likewise separate without cause. After hearing this wisdom, Confucius bowed respectfully in understanding, slowly walked home, and from then on ceased his preaching. Paradoxically, his disciples came to revere him even more.

On another occasion, the recluse Sanghu said: "On his deathbed, Emperor Shun admonished Yu: 'In navigating life, follow the natural course (yuan); let your form adapt to circumstances, and let your emotions remain genuine and unreserved (shuai).'" By following the natural course, one never strays from inherent nature; by being genuine, one avoids exhausting the mind. When Zhuangzi, dressed in patched coarse cloth, visited the King of Wei, the king asked why he appeared so destitute. Zhuangzi distinguished between "poverty" and "distress": a scholar's inability to practice his virtues is called "distress," whereas wearing tattered clothes is merely "poverty." Just as a gibbon leaps freely among nanmu trees but trembles in thorny thickets—not because its sinews stiffen, but because the environment is unfavorable—so too in an era of foolish rulers and corrupt ministers, how could one avoid hardship? This mirrors the fate of Bi Gan, who had his heart cut out.

When Confucius was trapped between Chen and Cai without cooked meals for seven days, he still tapped dried wood with his left hand and struck withered branches with his right, singing songs from the age of Shennong. Though the rhythm was irregular, the sounds of wood and voice merged effortlessly. As Yan Hui watched reverently, Confucius worried that his disciple's excessive admiration might lead to profound sorrow. He said: "Yan Hui, enduring the damages of heaven is easy, but refusing the artificial enhancements of man is hard. All things share the same origin and end—humanity and nature are fundamentally one. Who is the singer now? Merely one yielding to the natural course." When Yan Hui asked why "heaven's damages are easily endured," Confucius explained: Natural adversities like hunger, thirst, and weather are decreed by fate—simply accept them. But human-made gains and losses disturb the original mind—even sages struggle to resist them.

曰飢渴寒暑窮桎不行天地之行也 運物之 泄也 言與之偕逝之謂 也爲人臣者不敢去 之執臣之道猶若是而 況乎所以待天乎何 謂無受人益難仲尼曰始用四達 爵禄並至 而不窮物之所利乃 非己也吾命其在外者 也 君子不爲盜賢人不爲竊吾 若取之何哉 故曰島莫知於鷾鴯目之所不宜處不給 視 雖落其實棄之而走 其畏人 也而襲諸人間 社稷存焉爾 何謂無始而非卒仲尼 曰化其 萬物而不知其禪之者 焉知其所終焉知其 所始正而待之 而已耳何 謂人與天一邪仲 尼曰有人天也有天亦天 也人之不能有天 性也 聖人晏然體逝而終矣 莊周遊乎雕陵 之樊覩一異鵲 自南方來者翼廣七尺目大 運寸感周之顙 而集於栗林莊周曰此何鳥 哉翼殷不逝目 大不覩褰裳躍步執彈而留 之覩一蟬方得 美蔭而忘其身螳蜋執翳而 搏之見得而忘 其形 異鵲 從而利之見利而 忘其眞 莊周怵然曰噫物固相累 二類相召 也 捐彈而反走虞人逐而誶之 莊周反入三 月不庭蘭且從 而問之夫子何爲頃間甚不 庭乎莊周曰吾 守形而忘身 觀於濁水 而迷 於清淵 且吾聞諸夫子曰入其俗從其俗今 吾遊於雕陵而忘吾身異鵲感吾顙遊於栗 林而忘眞栗林虞人以吾爲戮吾所以不庭
Interpretation

This passage comes from the Zhuangzi·Shanmu chapter, using vivid parables to explore humanity's relationship with nature and the tension between worldly gain and authentic nature.

The text first discusses natural hardships like hunger, thirst, cold, and heat—inevitable aspects of the Dao (the Way) of heaven and earth. Just as subjects dare not disobey their ruler’s commands, humans should align themselves with the Dao of heaven. Confucius remarks: When he first entered public service, promotions and emoluments came effortlessly, yet these external rewards were never truly his own. A nobleman does not steal, nor does a virtuous man act as a thief—so what does it mean to forcibly seize such worldly possessions?

Next comes the metaphor of the small bird (鷾鴯): it refuses to linger where its eyes find no comfort, and even if carrying food in its beak, it will drop it and flee—for though it fears humans, it must still live among them. This mirrors the impermanent nature of states and altars, which appear eternal yet are ever-changing.

Confucius explains the principle of "no beginning, no end": all things are in constant transformation. We neither know how they shift nor where they ultimately lead. The relationship between humans and heaven follows the same pattern—humans are subject to heaven, while heaven itself follows natural laws. The sage peacefully aligns with this flux until life’s end.

Zhuangzi then recounts a personal experience at Diao Ridge: spotting an extraordinary magpie with wings spanning seven feet and eyes an inch wide, it brushed past his forehead. As he raised his slingshot to shoot it, he witnessed a chain of tragedies—a cicada chirping obliviously in the shade, a mantis seizing the cicada, and the magpie poised to snatch the mantis. Suddenly awakened, Zhuangzi realized: "This is how all things entangle and lure one another!" Fleeing after discarding his slingshot, he was even chased by a forest warden who mistook him for a poacher.

For three months afterward, he remained despondent at home. When his disciples asked why, Zhuangzi replied: "I was so fixated on observing external things that I forgot my own safety—like peering into murky water while failing to see the clear depths. My teacher once said, 'When entering a village, follow its customs,' yet in the chestnut grove, I pursued the magpie so blindly that even the warden sought to punish me. How could I not feel ashamed?"

These stories collectively illustrate how chasing external things leads one astray from their true nature. Only by harmonizing with the natural order and maintaining vigilance can one avoid the pitfalls of desire and mutual harm.

也 陽子之宋宿於逆旅逆旅 人有妾二人其 一人美其一人惡惡者貴而 美者賤陽子問 其故逆旅小子對曰其美者 自美吾不知其 美也其惡者自惡吾不知其 惡也陽子曰弟 子記之行賢而去自賢之行 安往而不愛哉     外篇田子方第二十一 田子方侍坐於魏丈侯數稱谿工文侯曰谿 工子之師邪子方曰非也無擇之里人也稱 道數當故無擇稱之文侯曰然則子無師邪 子方曰有曰子之師誰邪子方曰東郭順子 文侯曰然則夫子何故未嘗稱之子方曰其 爲人也眞 人貌而天 虚縁而葆眞清 而容物 物無道正 容以悟之使人之意也消 無擇何 足以稱之子方出文侯儻然終 日不言召前 立臣而語之曰遠矣全德之君 子始吾以聖 知之言仁義之行爲至矣吾聞 子方之師吾 形解而不欲動口鉗而不欲言 吾所學者眞 土梗耳 夫魏 眞爲我累耳温伯雪子適齊舍 魯魯人有請見之者温伯雪子曰不可吾 聞 中國之君子明乎禮義而陋於知人心吾 不 欲見也至於齊反舍於魯是人也又請見 温 伯雪子曰往也蘄見我今也又蘄見我是 必 有以振我也出而見客入而歎明日見客 又 入而歎其僕曰每見之客也必入而歎何 邪 曰吾固告子矣中國之民明乎禮義而陋 乎
Interpretation

Yangzi was traveling to the state of Song and stayed at an inn. The innkeeper had two concubines: one was beautiful, the other ugly. Strangely, the innkeeper favored the ugly one and neglected the beautiful one. Yangzi asked why, and a young attendant at the inn replied, “The beautiful one thinks herself beautiful, so I no longer find her beautiful. The ugly one knows she is ugly, so I no longer find her ugly.” Hearing this, Yangzi exclaimed, “My disciples, remember this: if a truly virtuous person can set aside the belief that he is virtuous, where could he go without being admired?”

When Tian Zifang sat beside Marquis Wen of Wei, he repeatedly praised Xigong. The marquis asked, “Is Xigong your teacher?” Tian Zifang replied, “No, he is just from my hometown. His reasoning is always apt, so I often mention him.” The marquis pressed him: “Then do you have no teacher?” Tian Zifang said, “I do. My teacher is Dongguo Shunzi.” The marquis was surprised. “Then why have I never heard you praise him?” Tian Zifang explained, “My teacher is utterly natural in character. His appearance is ordinary, but his nature is empty and still, and within himself he preserves what is genuine. He is clear and pure, yet able to embrace all things. When he encounters something contrary to what is right, he simply composes his bearing and transforms the other person, so that their wrongful thoughts dissolve of their own accord. How could I be worthy of judging such a state?”

After Tian Zifang left, Marquis Wen felt lost for the rest of the day. He said to the ministers around him, “How profound! A true person who has attained the Dao. I once thought that the words of sage wisdom and the practice of benevolence and righteousness were the highest attainments. Now, hearing of my teacher’s state, my body feels as though it has fallen apart, and I do not want to move; my mouth feels as though it has been clamped shut, and I do not want to speak. Only now do I understand that everything I learned before was lifeless doctrine, like clay figures and wooden puppets. Even my position as ruler of Wei has become a burden.”

When Wen Boxuezi was traveling to the state of Qi, he stopped in Lu. A man from Lu asked to meet him, but he refused, saying, “I have heard that the gentlemen of the Central States are well versed in ritual and righteousness, but do not understand the human heart. I do not wish to meet them.” On his way back from Qi, he passed through Lu again, and the same man came to ask for a meeting. After each visit, Wen Boxuezi would see him off and sigh. His servant asked why, and he replied, “I told you before: although people of the Central States understand ritual and righteousness, they are clumsy at understanding the human heart.”

知人心昔之見我者進退一成規一成矩 從 容一若龍一若虎 其諫我 也似子其道我也 似父是以 歎也仲尼見之而不言子路曰吾 子 欲見温伯雪子乆矣見之而不言何邪仲 尼 曰若夫人者目擊而道存矣亦不可以容 聲 矣 顔淵問於仲尼曰夫子步亦步夫 子趨 亦趨夫子馳亦馳夫子奔逸絶塵而回 瞠若 乎後矣夫子曰回何謂邪曰夫子步亦 步也 夫子言亦言也夫子趨亦趨也夫子辯 亦辯 也夫子馳亦馳也夫子言道回亦言道 也及 奔逸絶塵而回瞠若乎後者夫子不言 而信 不比而周無器而民蹈乎前而不知所 以然 而已矣仲尼曰惡可不察與夫哀莫大 於心 死而人死亦次之 日出東 方而入於西極萬 物莫不比方有目有 趾者待是而後成功是 出則存 是入則亡萬物亦然有待也而 死有 待也而生吾一受 其成形而不化以待盡效 物而動日夜無隙而不知其所終薰然其成 形 知命不能規乎其前丘以是日徂 吾終身 與汝交一臂 而失之可不哀與 汝殆著乎吾
Interpretation

This passage comes from the "Tian Zifang" chapter of the Zhuangzi, where a dialogue between Confucius and his disciples elucidates the Daoist understanding of the Dao and the state of cultivation.

After meeting Wenbo Xuezi, Confucius remained silent, puzzling his disciple Zilu. Confucius explained that with someone like Wenbo Xuezi, one glimpse reveals the embodiment of Dao (the Way) in his person—no words are necessary. This shows that those who truly attain the Dao manifest it through their very being.

Yan Hui confessed his frustration to Confucius about imitating his teacher's words and actions yet failing to keep pace. He described how he meticulously followed Confucius in walking, speaking, and debating, but when the master reached the realm of "soaring beyond the dust," he could only stare blankly while left behind. Confucius pointed out that true attainment isn't about external imitation but achieving states like "being trusted without speaking," "embracing all without partiality," and "having people follow spontaneously without authority"—all manifestations of Wuwei (non-action).

Confucius further expounded: The greatest sorrow in life is the death of one's spirit, with physical death being secondary. Just as the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, all things follow natural patterns. Once humans acquire physical form, they act according to external changes, moving ceaselessly day and night without knowing their ultimate destination. Life is like vapor taking form—even knowing one's fate can't predict what comes next. Confucius lamented: "Though I've associated with you my whole life, we've passed each other like strangers—isn't this tragic? You've probably only seen my outward appearance."

This passage reveals the core of Daoist cultivation: True Dao isn't attained through external imitation but through inner realization of unity with nature. Using the sun's movement and the growth of all things as metaphors, Confucius illustrates the Wuwei nature of Dao, emphasizing the importance of transcending form and returning to original authenticity.

所以著也彼已盡矣而汝求 之以爲有是求 馬於唐肆也 吾服 汝也甚忘汝 服吾也亦甚 忘雖然汝 奚患焉雖忘乎故吾吾有不忘者 存 孔子見老聃老聃新沐方將被 髮而乾慹 然似非人 孔子便而待之少 焉見曰丘也眩 與其信然與向者先生形體 掘若槁木似遺 物離人而立於獨也 老聃 曰吾遊心於物之 初 孔子曰何謂邪曰心困焉而不能 知口辟 焉而不能言 嘗爲汝議乎其將 至陰肅肅至 陽赫赫肅 肅出乎天赫赫發乎地兩者交通 成和 而物生焉或爲之紀而莫見其形 消息 滿虚一晦一明日改月化日有所爲 而莫見 其功生有所乎萌 死有所乎歸始終相反乎 無端而莫 知乎其所窮非是也且孰 爲之宗 孔子曰請問遊是老聃曰夫得是至 美至樂 也得至美而遊乎至樂謂之至人 孔子曰願 聞 其方曰草食之獸不疾易藪水生之蟲不 疾 易水行少變而不失其大常也 喜怒哀樂 不入於胸次 夫天下也者萬物之所一也得 其所一而 同焉則四支百體將爲塵垢而死 生終始將 爲晝夜而莫之能滑而況得喪禍 福之所介 乎棄隸者若棄泥塗知身貴 於隸
Interpretation

Here Zhuangzi uses a dialogue between Confucius and Laozi (Lao Dan) to reveal the Daoist pursuit of spiritual transcendence.

Laozi had just washed his hair and was letting it dry, his expression trance-like, resembling a wooden figurine. Noticing this, Confucius inquired about the reason. Laozi explained that his spirit was wandering in the primordial chaos of creation—a state difficult to describe in words: the killing chill of Yin Qi emanates from the heavens, while the blazing vitality of Yang Qi arises from the earth. The two energies intertwine, forming the patterns by which all things operate, yet their forms remain invisible. The cycle of life and death is like the alternation of day and night, with no discernible beginning or end.

When Confucius asked how to attain such a state, Laozi responded with a metaphor: beasts that graze on grass do not fret over changing pastures, and water-dwelling insects do not fear shifting waters, because they grasp the fundamental laws of existence. Those who attain the Dao are like this—neither joy nor anger, sorrow nor pleasure disturb their inner peace, for they understand the essential unity of all things under heaven. One who reaches this level of realization regards even their own limbs and body as mere dust, sees the cycle of life and death as natural as the turning of day and night, and remains indifferent to gain and loss, fortune and misfortune.

In the end, Laozi makes a crucial point: only those who understand how to discard external attachments (referred to as "隶," or "subordinate things") as easily as casting away dirt truly grasp that the body is more precious than worldly possessions. Here, "隶" symbolizes the fetters of secular pursuits—fame, wealth, and status—from which the Daoist cultivator must free themselves to return to the original purity of life.

也貴在於我而不失於變 且萬化而未始有 極也夫孰足以患心已爲 道者解乎此孔子 曰夫子德 配天地而猶假至言以修心古之 君子孰能 脱焉老聃曰不然夫水之於汋也 無爲而才 自然矣至人之於德也不修而物 不能離焉 若天之自高地之自厚日月之自 明夫何修 焉孔子出以 告顔回曰丘之於道 也其猶醯雞與 微夫 子之發吾覆也吾不知 天地之大全也 莊山見魯哀公哀公曰魯多 儒 士少爲先生方者莊子曰魯少儒哀公曰 舉 魯國而儒服何謂少乎莊子曰周聞之儒 者 冠圜冠者知天時履方履者知地形緩佩 玦 者事至而斷君子有其道者未必爲其服 也 爲其服者未必知其道也公固以爲不然 何 不號於國中曰無此道而爲此服者其罪 死 於是哀公號之五日而魯國無敢儒服者 獨 有一丈夫儒服而立乎公門公即召而問 以 國事千轉萬變而不窮莊子曰以魯國而 儒 者一人耳可謂多乎 百里奚爵禄不入於 心故飯牛而牛肥使 秦穆公忘其賤與之政 也有虞氏死生不入 於心故足以動人 宋元 君將畫圖衆史皆至受揖而立舐 筆和墨在 外者半有一史後至者儃儃然不 趨受揖不 立因之舍公使人視之則解衣槃 礴贏君曰 可矣是眞畫者也
Interpretation

This passage comes from the Nanhua Zhenjing (the Zhuangzi), using several stories to illustrate that the true Dao resides not in external forms but in internal realization.

The first section discusses the path of cultivation: What is truly valuable is maintaining one's original nature without being affected by external changes. The myriad things undergo endless transformations, but those who have attained the Dao remain undisturbed in their hearts. Confucius says that the virtue of ancient noblemen matched heaven and earth, yet they still cultivated their minds through profound teachings. Lao Dan (Laozi) counters this: Water naturally flows without deliberate effort, just as the virtue of Dao attainers manifests spontaneously—like heaven's natural height, earth's natural thickness, and the sun and moon's natural brightness. Why force cultivation? Hearing this, Confucius sighs to Yan Hui: My understanding of the Dao is as shallow as insects in a vinegar jar.

The second part uses the "Confucian robes" story to satirize formalism: Duke Ai of Lu boasts many Confucian scholars, but Zhuangzi claims true Confucians are rare. He explains that genuine Confucians must understand celestial patterns (wearing round hats), earthly principles (wearing square shoes), and decisive judgment (wearing jade pendants)—yet robe-wearers may lack this knowledge. When the Duke decrees death for "those wearing Confucian robes without understanding the Dao," only one true scholar dares keep wearing them after five days—a master of statecraft. Zhuangzi thus reveals: Only this man was Lu's real Confucian.

The third section presents three exemplars of Dao attainment: Baili Xi cared for oxen without concern for rank, yet Duke Mu of Qin elevated him; Emperor Shun's indifference to life and death moved others profoundly; when Song Yuanjun sought painters, the sole unhurried artist—stretching freely without competition—was recognized as the true master. These stories collectively demonstrate: Genuine cultivation is the natural expression of inner attainment, never forced performance.

文王觀於臧見一丈夫釣 而其釣 莫釣 非持其釣有釣者也常釣也 文 王欲舉而授之政而恐大臣父 兄之弗安也 欲終而釋之而不忍百姓之無 天也於是旦 而屬之大夫曰昔者寡人夢見 良人黑色而 𩑺乘駁馬而偏朱蹄號曰寓而 政於臧丈人 庶幾乎民有廖乎諸大夫蹴然 曰先君王也 文王曰然則卜之諸大夫曰先 君之命王其 無他又何卜焉遂迎臧丈人而 授之政典法 無更偏令無出三年文王觀於 國則列士壞 植散群長官者不成德螤斛不 敢入於四境 列士壞植散群則尚同也 長官者不 成德則 同務也螤斛不敢入於 四境則諸侯無二心 也文王 於是焉以爲大師北面而問曰政可 以及天 下乎臧丈人昧然而不應泛然而辭 朝令而 夜遁終身無聞 顔淵問 於仲尼曰文 王其猶未邪又何以夢爲乎仲 尼曰默汝無 言夫文王盡 之也而又何論刺焉彼直以循 斯須也 列御寇爲 伯昏無人射引之盈貫 措 杯水其肘上 發之 適矢復沓 方矢復寓當是 時猶象人也伯昏無人曰是射之射也非 不 射之射也嘗與汝登高山履危石臨百仞 之 淵若能射乎於是無人遂登高山履危石 臨 百仞之淵背逡巡足二分垂在外揖御寇 而
Interpretation

King Wen of Zhou was inspecting the Zang region when he encountered an elderly man fishing. The old man appeared to be angling, yet not truly fishing—his hands held the rod absentmindedly, as if merely maintaining the posture out of habit.

Wishing to employ this sage for governance, King Wen feared opposition from ministers and nobility. Yet abandoning the idea meant depriving the people of a wise leader. At dawn court the next day, he announced: "Last night I dreamt of a dark-faced sage astride a dappled horse with half-red hooves, who told me 'Entrust governance to the elder of Zang' to bring peace to our people." The ministers exclaimed: "This is our late king's message!" When King Wen proposed divination, they replied: "Since our ancestors command it, why consult shells?" Thus the old man was invited to govern.

During his administration, the elder neither amended existing laws nor issued new decrees. After three years, King Wen's inspection revealed: scholars disbanded factions ("lie shi" ceased forming cliques), officials refrained from self-promotion ("zhang guan zhe" no longer sought personal fame), and neighboring states dared not use false measures ("hu" referred to fraudulent grain vessels). This demonstrated national unity that deterred external ambitions.

King Wen then honored him as Grand Tutor, inquiring respectfully: "Can your way of governance extend throughout the realm?" The elder remained silent and vanished the next dawn, never to reappear.

Later, Yan Hui asked Confucius: "Wasn't King Wen virtuous enough? Why feign divine dreams?" Confucius replied: "Speak no more. King Wen achieved perfection—he simply responded to circumstance."

The subsequent anecdote describes Lie Yukou (Liezi) demonstrating archery before Bohun Wuren: drawing his bow with a cup balanced on his elbow, he fired successive arrows with mechanical precision. Bohun remarked: "This is shooting for technique's sake. Dare you shoot from mountain cliffs?" He then led Liezi to a precipice, standing backward over the abyss with two-thirds of his feet suspended, challenging him to shoot from this position.

(These paired parables illustrate Daoist concepts of "governing through wuwei (non-action)" and "the perfected person's selflessness." The Zang elder's apparent inaction achieved perfect order, while Liezi's archery allegory shows true mastery transcends form, reaching unity of self and action.)

進之御寇伏地汗流至踵伯昏無人曰夫 至 人者上闚青天下潜黄泉揮斥八極神氣 不 變 今 汝怵然有恂目之志爾於中也殆矣夫 肩吾問於孫叔敖曰子三爲令尹而不榮華 三去之而無憂色吾始也疑子今視子之鼻 間栩栩然子之用心獨柰何孫叔敖曰吾何 以過人哉吾以其來不可却也其去不可止 也吾以爲得失之非我也而無憂色而已矣 我何以過人哉且不知其在彼乎其在我乎 其在彼邪亡乎我在我邪亡乎彼 方將躊躇 方將四顧 何暇至乎人貴人賤哉 仲尼聞之 曰古之眞人知者不得說美 人不得濫盜人 不得劫伏戲黄帝不得友 死生亦大矣而無 變乎己 况爵禄乎若然者其神經乎大山而 無介入 乎淵泉而不濡處卑細而不憊充滿 天地旣 以與人己愈有 楚王與凡君坐 少焉 楚王左右曰凡亡者三凡君曰 凡 之亡也不 足以 喪吾存夫凡之亡不足以喪吾存則楚 之存不足以存存 由是觀之則凡未始亡而 楚未始存 也     外篇知北遊第二十二 知北遊於玄水之上登隱弅之丘而適遭無 爲謂焉知謂無爲謂曰予欲有問乎若何思 何慮則知道何處何服則安道何從何道則 得道三問而無爲謂不答也非不答不知答 也知不得問反於白水之南登狐闋之上而 覩狂屈焉知以之言也問乎狂屈狂屈曰唉
Interpretation

The Nanhua Zhenjing (Classic of Nanhua) presents several stories illustrating Daoist cultivation:

The first passage describes Lie Yukou (Liezi) paying respects to Bohun Wuren (a Daoist master). Liezi was so nervous that sweat poured down his back. Bohun Wuren remarked: "A true master of the Dao can observe the heavens above and penetrate the earth below, with spirit reaching the eight directions while maintaining unaltered composure. Your unsettled mind reveals your cultivation remains incomplete."

The second episode features a dialogue between Jianwu and Sunshu Ao. Jianwu asked why Sunshu Ao felt neither pride after becoming prime minister of Chu three times, nor sorrow after three dismissals. Sunshu Ao replied: "I understand official positions are beyond my control, thus they don't occupy my mind. Gain and loss are external matters—why distinguish whether they belong to others or myself?" When Confucius heard this, he praised: "This is a true ancient master of the Dao (zhenren), whom even life and death cannot shake, let alone official posts and salaries. Such a person's spirit can pass through mountains unhindered and dive into deep waters without getting wet."

The third narrative records an exchange between the King of Chu and the ruler of Fan. The king's attendant remarked that Fan had been destroyed three times, to which the Fan ruler responded: "Fan's destruction cannot truly annihilate me. If Fan's fall cannot eliminate me, then Chu's existence doesn't constitute true existence either." This demonstrates the relativity of existence and destruction.

The final story follows Zhi (a person's name) traveling northward seeking the Dao. By the Dark River he met Wuweiwei (Master of Non-Action), asking three questions about attaining the Dao, but received no reply. Later encountering Kuangqu, the latter began to answer but forgot what to say. This illustrates the ineffable nature of the true Dao.

予知之將語若中欲言而忘其所欲言知不 得問反於帝宫見黄帝而問焉黄帝曰無思 無慮始知道無處無服始安道無從無道始 得道知問黄帝曰我與若知之彼與彼不知 也其孰是耶黄帝曰彼無爲謂眞是也狂屈 似之我與汝終不近也夫知者不言言者不 知故聖人行不言之教 道不可致 德不可至 仁可爲 也義可虧也禮相僞也故曰失道而 後德失 德而後仁失仁而後義失義而後禮 禮者道 之華而亂之首也故曰爲道 者日損 損之又損之以至於無爲無爲 而無不爲也 今已爲物也 欲復歸根不亦難乎其易也其 唯大 人乎生 者死之徒死者生之始孰知其 紀人之生氣之聚也聚 則爲生散則爲死若 死生爲徒吾 又何患故萬物一也是其所美 者爲神 奇其所惡者爲臭腐臭腐復化爲神 奇神奇 復化爲臭腐故曰通天下一氣耳 聖 人故貴一知謂 黄帝曰吾問無爲謂無爲謂 不應我非不我 應不知應我也吾問狂屈狂 屈中欲告我而 不我告非不我告中欲告而 忘之也今予問 乎若若知之奚故不近黄帝 曰彼其眞是也 以其不知也此其似之也以 其忘之也予與 若終不近也以其知之也狂
Interpretation

This passage comes from the Nanhua Zhenjing (also known as the Zhuangzi), where the dialogue between the Yellow Emperor (Huangdi) and figures like Wuweiwei ("Non-Action Say-Nothing") and Kuangqu ("Madly Bent") illustrates the Daoist understanding of the Dao (the Way).

The Yellow Emperor said: To know the Dao, one must relinquish thought and calculation; to abide in the Dao, one must free oneself from external attachments; to attain the Dao, one must not pursue it deliberately. Those who truly understand the Dao do not speak of it boastfully, while those who talk about it all day do not truly grasp it. Thus, the sage teaches through wordless instruction.

The Dao cannot be grasped by force, nor can De (Virtue/Power) be achieved through contrivance. Humaneness can be practiced deliberately, righteousness may fall short, and ritual easily becomes superficial artifice. When the Dao is lost, people seek De; when De is lost, they turn to humaneness; when humaneness is lost, they pursue righteousness; and when righteousness is lost, they rely on ritual. Ritual is merely the outer form of the Dao—yet it becomes the beginning of disorder.

The path of cultivation lies in continuously reducing artificial effort until one reaches the state of Wuwei (non-action). Once Wuwei is attained, one can accomplish all things effortlessly. But once a person becomes entangled in material pursuits, returning to the original source becomes exceedingly difficult.

Life and death are inherently interconnected—life is the continuation of death, and death is the beginning of life. Human life is the gathering of Qi (vital energy); when Qi gathers, there is life, and when it scatters, there is death. All things in the world are fundamentally one. What people deem beautiful is called miraculous, while what they loathe is labeled foul. Yet the foul can transform into the miraculous, and the miraculous can decay into the foul. Thus, the entire world is but the shifting of a single Qi.

In the end, the Yellow Emperor concluded: Wuweiwei is the one who has truly attained the Dao, precisely because he knows nothing (and does not strive for it); Kuangqu is close to the Dao because he has forgotten (and does not cling); while I and you, knowing too much, are actually farther from the Dao.

屈聞之以黄帝 爲知言 天地有大 美而不言 四時有明法而不議萬物有成理 而不說聖 人者原天地之美而達 萬物之理是故至人 無爲 大聖不作觀於天地之謂也 今彼神明 至精與彼百化 物已死生方圓莫知其根也 扁然而萬物 自古以固存六合爲巨 未離其 内 秋豪爲小侍之在體天下莫 不沈浮終身 不故陰陽四時運行各得 其序惛然若亡而 存 油然不形而神萬物 畜而不知此之謂本 根 可以觀於天矣齧缺 問道乎被衣被衣曰 若正汝形一汝視天和 將至攝汝知一汝度 神將來舍德將爲汝美 道將爲汝居汝瞳焉 如新生之犢而無求其 故言未卒齧缺睡寐 被衣大悅行歌而去之 曰形若槁骸心若死 灰眞其實知不以故自 持 媒媒晦晦 無心而 不可與謀彼何人哉 舜問乎丞曰道可得而 有乎曰 汝身非汝有也汝何得有夫道 舜曰 吾身非吾有也孰有之哉 曰是天地之委形 也生非汝有是天地之委 和也性命非汝有 是天地之委順也孫子 非汝有是天地之委 蜕也
Interpretation

This scripture, through dialogues between the Yellow Emperor and several sages, expounds the Daoist understanding of the operating principles governing heaven, earth, and all things.

The Yellow Emperor realized: Heaven and earth contain magnificent beauty yet never speak of it; the four seasons follow clear laws yet require no discussion; all beings possess their own growth patterns yet need no explanation. True sages (those who have attained the Dao) can perceive the beauty of heaven and earth and comprehend the principles of all things. Therefore, those who awaken to the Dao do not act deliberately, and the highest sages never interfere arbitrarily - this is precisely the revelation gained from observing heaven and earth.

The marvelous power of the divine workings (natural creation) causes the myriad things to transform endlessly - life and death cycle through countless forms, yet none can fathom their fundamental source. All things have existed naturally since ancient times; whether the vast cosmos or the tip of an autumn hair (the finest animal fur), all are contained within natural laws. Everything fluctuates and changes according to the movements of yin-yang and the four seasons, appearing chaotic yet possessing inherent order, formless yet containing divine mystery. All things grow spontaneously within nature without self-awareness - this is the "root foundation" (fundamental principle).

In another dialogue, Nie Que sought advice from Bei Yi on methods for pursuing the Dao. Bei Yi told him: "Straighten your posture, focus your gaze, and natural harmony will descend upon you; restrain your cleverness, unify your thoughts, and the spirit (shen) will take residence. Maintain purity like a newborn calf, completely free from preconceptions." Before Bei Yi finished speaking, Nie Que had already fallen into tranquil sleep. Observing this, Bei Yi departed joyfully singing, praising how Nie Que's body resembled withered wood and his mind like dead ashes (describing complete relinquishment of attachments), possessing true knowledge yet not clinging to it, being muddled yet without cunning - truly beyond ordinary comprehension.

The sage-king Shun asked the wise Cheng whether one could possess the "Dao." Cheng replied: "Even your body does not belong to you - how could you possess the Dao? Your physical form is entrusted by heaven and earth; your life is the harmonious qi (vital energy) bestowed by heaven and earth; your nature and destiny follow heaven and earth's natural transformations; your descendants represent the metamorphic workings of heaven and earth." This reveals that everything manifests the natural Dao, and humans should not cling to notions of possession.

故行不知所往處不知所持食不知所 味 天地之彊陽氣也又胡可得而有 邪 孔子 問於老聃 曰今日晏間敢問至道老聃曰汝 齋戒疏淪 而心澡雪而精神掊擊而知夫道 窅然難言 哉將爲汝言其崖略夫昭昭生於 冥冥有倫 生於無形精神生於道 形本生於 精 而萬物以形相生故九竅者胎生八 竅者 卵生 其來無迹其往無崖 無門無房四達之 皇皇 也 邀於此者四枝彊思慮恂達耳目聰 明其用 心不勞其應物無方 天不得不高地 不得不廣日月不 得不行萬物不得不昌此 其道與 且 夫博之不必知辯之不必慧聖人 以斷之矣 若夫益 之而不加益損之而不加 損者聖人之所保 也淵淵乎其若海巍巍 乎 其終則復始也 運量萬物而不匱 則君子之 道彼 其外與萬物皆往資焉而不匱此其 道 與 中國有人焉非陰 非陽處於天地之間直 且爲人 將反於宗自本觀之 生者喑醷物也 雖有壽夭相去 幾何須臾之說也奚足以爲 堯桀之是非 果蓏有理 人倫雖難所以相齒 聖人遭之而不違過之而不守調而應之德 也偶而應之道也帝之所與 王之所起也人 生天 地之間若白駒之過郤忽然而已 注然 勃然莫不出焉油然 漻然莫不入焉已 化而 生又化而死生物哀 之人類悲之解其天弢 墮其天𧙍
Interpretation

This passage comes from Zhuangzi·Knowledge Wanders North, presenting a dialogue between Confucius and Laozi (Lao Dan) that explores the "Ultimate Dao" (supreme truth). Laozi tells Confucius: To comprehend the Great Dao, one must first purify the mind through fasting (fasting and cleansing), wash away mental distractions (refining the spirit), and shatter preconceived knowledge (smashing conventional understanding). Because the Dao is profound and ineffable, only a general outline can be described.

The principle of all things' generation is this: brightness is born from darkness (the clear emerges from the obscure), the formed arises from the formless. Spirit (Shen) originates from the Dao, physical form is rooted in vital essence (Jing), and all things give rise to one another through their forms—such as the viviparous creatures with nine orifices and the oviparous creatures with eight. The Dao comes and goes without trace; it has no fixed gate yet penetrates all directions. Those who align with the Dao develop strong limbs, clear thinking, sharp senses, and effortless composure in life.

All things between heaven and earth follow the Dao's law: heaven cannot but be high, earth cannot but be vast, the sun and moon cannot but move, and all things cannot but flourish. True wisdom does not lie in vast learning or eloquence. The sage understands that some things neither increase when added to nor diminish when taken from (such as the Dao itself)—this is the root that must be preserved. The Dao is as deep as the ocean, as lofty as mountains, cycling endlessly without exhaustion, nourishing all things without depletion.

Human life exists between heaven and earth, neither purely Yin nor Yang, ultimately returning to its source. Viewed from the root, life is but a brief gathering of Qi (a fleeting condensation), where the difference between longevity and premature death is merely a moment in eternity. Fruits and melons each have their patterns (even gourds follow principles), and though human relations are complex (human affairs may be intricate), they all follow a natural order. The sage follows the Dao without resistance—harmonizing with circumstances is De (Virtue), responding naturally is the Dao, and this is the foundation of imperial governance.

Life is like sunlight flashing through a crack (a white steed glimpsed through a crevice), vanishing in an instant. All things flourish into being and fade quietly away, constantly transforming from birth to death. Creatures grieve over this, and humans lament it, but one should loosen the bonds of nature (heaven's sheath) and cast off the fetters of fate (heaven's satchel), yielding to the natural flow of change.

紛乎宛乎 魂魄將往 乃身從之乃 大歸乎不形之形形 之不形是人之所同 知 也非將至之所務也此衆人之所同論也彼 至則不論論則不至明見無值辯不若默道 不可聞聞不若塞此之謂大得東郭子問於 莊子曰所謂道惡乎在莊子曰無所不在東 郭子曰期而後可莊子曰在螻蟻曰何其下 邪曰在稊稗曰何其愈下邪曰在瓦甓曰何 其愈甚邪曰 在屎溺東郭子不應莊子曰夫 子之問也固 不及質 正獲之問於監市履狶 也每下愈況 汝唯莫必無乎逃物 至道若是 大言亦然周徧 咸三者異名同實其指一也 嘗相與游乎無 何有之宫同合而論無所終 窮乎嘗 相與無爲乎澹而靜乎漠而清乎 調 而間乎寥已吾志無往焉而 不知其所至去 而來而不知其所止吾已往來焉而不知其 所終仿徨乎嗎閎大知入焉而不知其所窮 物物者與物無際而物有際者所謂物際者 也不際之 際際之不際者也 謂盈虚衰殺彼 爲盈虚非盈虚彼爲 衰殺非衰殺彼爲本末 非本末彼爲積散非 積散也 妸荷甘與神農 同學於老龍 吉神農隱几闔户晝瞑妸荷甘 日中多户而 入曰老龍死矣神農隱几擁杖 而起嚗然放 杖而笑 曰天知予僻陋慢訑故 棄予而死已矣夫子 無所發予之狂言而死 矣夫
Interpretation

This passage comes from “Knowledge Wanders North” in the Zhuangzi. Through a dialogue between Dongguozi and Zhuangzi, it vividly explains how the Dao is everywhere. Here is a plain-language interpretation:

Dongguozi asked Zhuangzi, “Where exactly is the Dao you speak of?” Zhuangzi replied, “It is everywhere.” When Dongguozi insisted that he point to a specific place, Zhuangzi said, “It is in the ants.” “How can it be in something so lowly?” “In the weeds.” “How can it be in something even lower?” “In tiles and bricks.” “Why does it get lower and lower?” At last, Zhuangzi said, “In shit and piss.” Dongguozi was left speechless.

Zhuangzi explained, “The way you ask the question is itself flawed. It is like a market inspector checking whether a pig is fat: the lower he presses—on the pig’s legs, for instance—the more clearly he sees what it is really like. You need not fixate on particular things, because the Dao exists in all things. The words ‘all-embracing,’ ‘pervading,’ and ‘all-pervasive’ have different names, but they all mean that the Dao is everywhere.”

The passage then describes a state of transcendence: roaming in a palace of emptiness, merging with the Great Dao, with no end in sight. One remains detached and tranquil, calm and at ease, with a clear and open mind. The heart and mind cling to nothing; one comes and goes freely, without knowing where one is headed, wandering through the vastness of Heaven and Earth. True great wisdom merges into this state, yet no boundary can be found.

The Dao that governs the myriad things has no boundary separating it from them, while particular things do have boundaries between one another. What is called a boundary is, in fact, a boundary without boundaries. The Dao governs fullness and emptiness, decline and destruction, root and branch, gathering and dispersal, yet it is not itself any of these opposing phenomena.

The passage ends with a parable. Ehegan and Shennong went together to study the Dao under Laolong Ji. Shennong was dozing at his desk in the daytime when, at noon, Ehegan pushed open the door and said, “Laolong Ji has died!” Shennong rose, leaning on his cane, then suddenly threw it down and laughed: “Heaven knows that I am ignorant and unruly, so it let the Master die with his profound teaching.”

Through dialogue and parable, the passage shows that the Dao exists in things both exalted and lowly, emphasizing its universality and transcendence. The parable of Laolong Ji’s death also suggests that the most profound truths are often beyond words.

弇堈弔聞之曰夫體道者天 下之君子 所擊焉 今於道秋豪之端萬分 未得處一焉 而猶知藏其 狂言而死又況夫體道者乎 視 之無形聽之無聲於人之論者謂之 㝠㝠所 以論道而非道也 於是泰清問乎無窮曰子 知道乎無窮 曰吾不知又問乎無爲無爲曰 吾知道曰子 之知道亦有數乎曰有曰其數 若何無爲曰 吾知道之可以貴可以賤可以 約可以散此 吾所以知道之數也泰清以之 言也問乎無 始曰若是則無窮之弗知與無 爲之知孰是 而孰非乎無始曰不知深矣知 之淺矣弗知 内矣知之外矣於是泰清中而 歎曰弗知乃 知乎知乃不知乎孰知不知之 知 無始曰道不可聞聞而 非也道不可見見 而非也道不可言言而非 也知形形之不形 乎 道不當名無始 曰有問道而應之者不知 道也雖問道者亦 未聞道道無問問無應 無 問問之是問窮也無應應之是無内也 以無 内待問窮若是者外不觀 乎宇宙内不知乎 大初是以不過乎崑崙不 遊乎太虚 光曜問 乎無有曰夫子有乎其無有乎 光曜不得問 而孰視其狀貌窅然空然終日 視之而不見 聽之而不聞搏之而不得也光 曜曰至矣其 孰能至此乎予能有無矣而未 能無無也及 爲無有矣何從至此哉
Interpretation

Yan Gang Diao (an ancient recluse) once said: Those who truly comprehend the Great Dao are revered by all noble persons in the world. Yet people today understand less than the tip of an autumn animal's hair about the Dao, yet presume to conceal their arrogant words and live out their days in this ignorance - how much further are they from those who truly embody the Dao!

The Great Dao appears formless to the eye and soundless to the ear. What people discuss as profound and mysterious principles are merely superficial aspects of the Dao, not the Dao itself.

Thereupon Taiqing (the truth-seeker) first asked Wuqiong (symbolizing infinite existence): "Do you understand the Dao?" Wuqiong replied: "I do not know." He then asked Wuwei (symbolizing natural non-action), who said: "I understand the Dao." Taiqing pressed further: "Does the Dao you understand have specific characteristics?" Wuwei answered: "It does. The Dao can be noble or humble, can condense or disperse - this is what I know of the Dao."

Taking these answers, Taiqing consulted Wushi (symbolizing the origin of all things): "Wuqiong claims ignorance while Wuwei claims knowledge - who is correct?" Wushi replied: "He who claims ignorance understands profoundly, while he who claims knowledge understands superficially. Not-knowing is internal realization, while knowing is merely external description." Taiqing sighed: "So not-knowing is true knowledge, while knowing is actually ignorance!"

Wushi further explained: The Dao cannot be heard with ears - what is heard is not the true Dao; cannot be seen with eyes - what is seen is not the true Dao; cannot be spoken with words - what is spoken is not the true Dao. Know that all formed things originate from the formless. The Dao should not be named. One who answers when asked about the Dao does not truly understand it. The questioner likewise doesn't truly comprehend the Dao. The Dao neither requires questioning nor answering. To insist on questioning is to split hairs; to insist on answering reveals inner emptiness. Using an empty mind to address hair-splitting questions means such a person can neither perceive the external universe clearly nor penetrate internal origins deeply, thus unable to transcend the Kunlun paradise or roam the realm of supreme void.

Later, Guangyao (symbolizing light) asked Wuyou (symbolizing nothingness): "Do you, sir, exist or not exist?" Receiving no answer, Guangyao carefully observed Wuyou's appearance: profoundly empty, looking all day yet seeing nothing, listening yet hearing nothing, reaching out yet touching nothing. Guangyao sighed: "The supreme state! Who can attain this? I can achieve 'being' and 'non-being,' but not 'the non-being of non-being.' Only when even the concept of 'nothingness' is relinquished can one truly reach this realm."

大馬之捶鉤者年八 十矣而不失豪芒 大馬曰子巧與有道與曰 臣 有守也臣之年二十而好捶鉤於物無視 也 非鉤無察也是用之者假不用者也以長 得 其用而況乎無不用者乎物孰不資焉 冉 求問於仲尼曰未 有天地可知邪仲尼曰可 古猶今也 冉求失問而退明日復見曰昔者 吾 問未有天地可知乎夫子曰可古猶今也 昔 日吾照然今日吾昧然敢問何謂也仲尼 曰 昔之昭然也神者先受之 今之昧然也且 又爲不神者求邪 無古無今無始無終 未有 子孫而有子孫可乎 冉求未對仲尼曰已矣 未應矣不 以生生死不以死死生 死生有待 邪皆有所一 體有先天地生者物邪物物者 非物物 出不得先物也猶其有物也 無已 聖 人之愛人也終無已者亦乃取於是 者也顔 淵問乎仲尼曰回 嘗聞諸夫子曰無有所將 無有所迎回敢問 其遊仲尼曰古之人外化 而内不化 今之人内化而外不化與物化者 一 不化者也安化安不化 安與之相靡必與 之莫多狶韋氏之囿黄帝之圃有虞氏之宫 湯武之室君子之人若儒墨者師故以是非 相𩐎也而況今之人乎聖人處物不傷物不 傷物者物亦不能傷也唯無所傷者爲能與 人相將迎 山林與臯壤與使我欣欣然而樂 與樂未畢也哀又繼之哀樂之來吾不能禦
Interpretation

This passage comes from the Nanhua Zhenjing (also known as the Zhuangzi), which expounds Daoist philosophy through several conversational anecdotes.

A grand marshal of Chu encountered an eighty-year-old craftsman who could still forge hooks with perfect precision and asked if he possessed any special technique. The old artisan replied: "Since I was twenty, I've devoted myself solely to hook-making, with undivided attention—my eyes see nothing but hooks." This illustrates how when fully focused on a task, what seems "unused" (referring to unrelated senses) actually supports the "used" aspect (the focused work). If even these "unused" capacities can be properly utilized, what in the world cannot be made to serve one's purpose?

Ran Qiu (a disciple of Confucius) asked his master: "Can we know what existed before Heaven and Earth formed?" Confucius answered: "Yes, for past and present share the same essence." The next day, Ran Qiu returned perplexed: "Yesterday I understood this truth, yet today I'm confused again." Confucius explained: "Yesterday's understanding came through your spirit (Shen) directly perceiving it, while today's confusion arises because you're trying to grasp it with unspiritual thinking. In truth, there's no fundamental distinction between ancient and modern, beginning and end—just as we cannot say whether descendants or ancestors came first. The same applies to life and death: don't use concepts of life to understand death, nor death to understand life, for they are fundamentally one."

Yan Hui (another Confucian disciple) inquired: "You once said 'neither deliberately send anything away nor deliberately welcome anything'—what does this mean?" Confucius responded: "The ancients changed outwardly while remaining constant inwardly (external transformation with internal non-transformation), whereas modern people change internally while clinging to external forms (internal transformation with external non-transformation). Those who have attained the Dao (the Way) transform along with all things while preserving inner constancy. Whether experiencing the joy brought by mountains and wilderness or the sorrow that follows, sages accept all without being swayed. They neither harm the myriad things nor are harmed by them—this is the true meaning of 'neither welcoming nor sending away.'"

These dialogues collectively demonstrate the core Daoist principle of "following natural spontaneity": maintaining inner constancy while neither resisting nor forcing external changes, thereby achieving harmonious coexistence with all phenomena.

其去弗能止悲夫世人直爲物逆旅耳夫知 遇而不知所不遇知能能而不能所不能無 知無能者固人之所不免也夫務免乎人之 所不免者豈不亦悲哉至言 去言至爲去爲 齊知之所知則
Interpretation

This passage comes from the Nanhua Zhenjing (also known as the Zhuangzi), discussing the limitations of human cognition and the pursuit of transcendence.

People often cannot control the departure of things, and it is lamentable that worldly individuals are like temporary sojourners dwelling in the material realm. They only know what they have encountered, unaware of what they have not; they only understand what they can do, ignorant of what lies beyond their capabilities. These inherent limitations in cognition and ability are fundamentally unavoidable for humans.

If one insists on forcibly overcoming these innate limitations, is that not even more pitiable? The highest form of speech is to abstain from speaking (zhiyan quyan), and the most perfect action is non-action (zhiwei quwei). To rigidly seek uniform understanding of all knowledge reflects a shallow level of comprehension.

Here, the Daoist concept of wuwei (non-action) is introduced, suggesting that striving for perfection in cognition and ability actually contradicts the natural Dao. True wisdom lies in recognizing human limitations and following nature without forced effort.

淺矣

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0051); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 6 Vol. 8 →