中文 · EN

《道德真經集註(二)》Vol. 12

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 12 / 18 9,068 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經集註(二)》 Vol. 12 (Dongshen 洞神部, 18 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 18 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經集註(二)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經集註卷之十二     已七     宋 鶴 林 彭 耜 纂 集    大成若缺章第四十五 大成若缺其用不敝大盈若沖其用不窮大 直若屈大巧若拙大辯若訥  御註曰域中有四大道居一焉體道之全  故可名於大無成與虧是謂大成不有其  成故若缺故其用不敝此孔子所以集大  成而爲聖之時  碧虚子陳景元曰大成謂全德之君子如  大壑酌之而不竭明鑑應之而不疲故曰  其用不敝盛德大業者謙冲而不驕富貴  滿堵者虚儉而不奢所用豈能窮匱大直  者謂隨物而直彼含垢而不申其直不在  己故若屈也大巧者謂因物性之自然而  成器用不造爲異端故若拙也  涑水司馬光曰物成必毁盈必溢理之常  也有道者雖成若缺雖盈若冲故不弊不  窮  潁濱蘇轍曰天下以不缺爲成故成必有  弊以不虚爲盈故盈必有窮聖人要於大  成而不恤其缺期於大盈而不惡其沖是  以成而不弊盈而不窮也直而不屈其直  必折循理而行雖曲而直巧而不拙其巧  必勞付物自然雖拙而巧辯而不訥其辯  必窮因理而言雖訥而辯  臨川王安石曰萬物始乎是終乎是是大  成也  陸佃曰大成不見其足故若缺大盈不見  其溢故若冲大直不見其伸故若屈大巧  不見其力故若拙大辯不見其給故若訥
Interpretation

Chapter 45 of the Daode Jing presents seemingly paradoxical yet profoundly insightful truths. The most perfect thing appears incomplete ("Great completion seems lacking"), yet its efficacy never diminishes; the most abundant thing seems empty ("Great fullness seems hollow"), yet its function is inexhaustible. True straightness appears crooked, the most skillful art seems clumsy, and the most eloquent speech seems halting.

Emperor Huizong of Song (in his imperial commentary) explains: Among the four greats in the cosmos (Dao, Heaven, Earth, and the King), Dao stands supreme. Those who truly embody the Dao do not cling to achievements, hence they appear flawed. This is why Confucius was called the "Grand Synthesizer"—he could adapt to circumstances without rigid attachments.

Chen Jingyuan (Master Bixu) elucidates: A gentleman of complete virtue is like a deep valley—inexhaustible when drawn upon; like a bright mirror—never weary of reflecting. The truly upright person yields to external conditions without stubbornness, appearing compliant yet genuinely straight; the truly skillful craftsman follows the natural grain of materials, appearing awkward yet supremely competent.

Sima Guang (the Historian of Sushui) analyzes through common principles: When things reach their extreme, they reverse course, but Daoist adepts maintain this "seemingly insufficient" state, thus avoiding decline. Su Zhe (of Yingbin) adds: Ordinary people chase superficial perfection and thus easily fail; sages pursue inner fulfillment and therefore endure. Like working wood along its grain—seemingly crooked yet truly straight; like acting in accordance with natural patterns—seemingly clumsy yet profoundly skillful.

Wang Anshi (of Linchuan) contends: All things originate from Dao and return to Dao—this constitutes true "great completion." Lu Dian concludes: Genuine perfection shows no outward signs, hence appears lacking; true abundance makes no display, hence seems empty. These apparent contradictions precisely reveal the profundity of the Dao.

 清源子劉驥曰道無成虧故謂之大成道  無盈虚故謂之大盈不有其成故若缺不  見其盈故若沖成必有虧以其若缺故其  用不敝盈必有虚以其若沖故其用不窮  大直者直而不肆故若屈大巧者不爲而  成故若拙大辯者不言之教故若訥  黄茂材曰苟不知道其誰肯以屈拙訥自  處哉 躁勝寒靜勝熱清靜爲天下正  御註曰陽動而躁故勝寒陰止而靜故勝  熱二者毗乎陰陽而不適乎中方且爲物  汨方且與動爭爲能正天下惟無勝寒之  躁勝熱之靜則不雜而清抱神以靜天下  將自正  碧虚子陳景元曰躁動也言春夏陽氣發  於地上萬物因之以生物極則反故夏至  則一陰生乎其中矣氣動極則寒寒則萬  物以衰死明躁爲死本盛爲衰原夫至清  者在濁而物莫能滑亂至靜者處動而事  莫能溷撓且大成大盈大直大巧大辯則  有不敝不窮若屈若缺若訥以對之惟清  惟靜則可以持衆事而爲天下之中正者  也莊子曰抱神以靜形將自正必靜必清  無勞汝形無摇汝精乃可以長生也  潁濱蘇轍曰成而不缺盈而不沖直而不  屈巧而不拙辯而不訥譬如躁之不能靜  靜之不能躁耳夫躁能勝寒而不能勝熱  靜能勝熱而不能勝寒皆滯於一偏而非  其正也唯泊然清靜不染於一非成非缺
Interpretation

Master Liu Ji of Qingyuan said: The Dao (the cosmic origin and principle) knows neither completion nor deficiency, thus it is called "Great Completion"; it recognizes neither fullness nor emptiness, thus it is named "Great Plenitude." Precisely because it does not cling to achievement, it appears deficient; because it does not display fullness, it seems empty. When things reach their extreme, they inevitably reverse. Precisely because it appears deficient, its function never wanes; because it seems empty, its efficacy is inexhaustible.

True Great Straightness (ultimate integrity) is upright yet unobtrusive, thus appearing bent; Great Skill (supreme craftsmanship) accomplishes naturally without forced action, thus seeming clumsy; Great Eloquence (supreme persuasion) teaches through wordless guidance, thus appearing inarticulate. Huang Maocai added: Without understanding this principle, who would willingly display submission, clumsiness, or inarticulateness?

Restlessness can overcome cold, while stillness can conquer heat. However, the Imperial Commentary notes that restlessness belongs to Yang and stillness to Yin—both are partial extremes. Only by maintaining a state of pure serenity, free from the opposition between restlessness and stillness, can one become the standard for all under heaven. Master Chen Jingyuan of Bixu explained through natural phenomena: In spring and summer, the restless Yang Qi (vital energy) stimulates growth, but when things reach their peak, they reverse—the Yin Qi begins to emerge at the summer solstice. Excessive restlessness leads to decline, while those who embody perfect clarity and stillness maintain their true nature even amidst chaos.

Su Zhe (Yingbin) argued that clinging to singular states—perfection, plenitude, straightness, cleverness, or eloquence—is as one-sided as restlessness that cannot be still or stillness that cannot be restless. Restlessness can ward off cold but not heat; stillness can resist heat but not cold. Only by preserving tranquil serenity, free from all extremes—neither pursuing perfection nor fixating on deficiency—can one embody the Middle Way. As Zhuangzi said: When the spirit is calm, the body naturally becomes upright; without exhausting the body or disturbing the Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy), one attains long life and enduring vision.

 非盈非冲非直非屈非巧非拙非辯非訥  而後無所不勝可以爲天下正矣  達眞子曰春與夏則萬物動之時也動之  極則有寒之者至焉故曰躁勝寒是躁勝  之時必有寒也秋與冬則萬物靜之時也  靜之極則有熱之者至焉故曰靜勝熱是  靜勝之時必有熱也此理之必然矣皆出  於勝極之所致也惟大成猶若缺大盈猶  若冲大直猶若屈大巧猶若缺大辯猶若  訥皆無其勝極之心也心無勝極則清不  爲物所污靜不爲動所誘若是則心之所  造其有不正哉故曰清靜爲天下正  葉夢得曰春秋傳曰正直爲正正曲爲直  清靜之爲天下正正其直者也  黄茂材曰有天之寒暑有人之寒暑墮脂  折膠天之寒亦甚矣而躁則勝之爍石流  金天之暑亦酷矣而靜則勝之乃知人身  自有一宇宙其寒暑足以勝天之寒暑若  其知道清靜自然則可同於太極爲天下  正何至於勝之   天下有道章第四十六 天下有道却走馬以糞天下無道戎馬生於 郊  御註曰以道治天下者民各樂其業而無  所爭糞其田疇而已强陵弱衆暴寡雖疆  界不能正也  碧虚子陳景元曰却屏去也糞治田也郊  交也言二國相交之境也天下有道謂時  之泰也兵革寢息人多務本户競農桑屏  去走馬之武功而歸治田之常業天下無
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the philosophy of "clarity, stillness, and non-action (Wuwei)," using natural phenomena and human cultivation to demonstrate the principle that the great Dao (the Way) is supremely simple.

The text begins with seasonal changes as metaphor: When spring and summer reach their peak of agitation, cold energy arrives to restore balance; when autumn and winter reach their extreme stillness, warm energy comes to harmonize. This illustrates how when things develop to their limits, opposing forces inevitably emerge to counterbalance them. True great wisdom always appears incomplete ("the greatest perfection seems defective"), the fullest state paradoxically seems empty ("the greatest abundance seems vacant"), the most upright expression seems bent ("the straightest appears crooked"), the most skillful technique seems clumsy ("the greatest skill appears awkward"), and the most eloquent person seems taciturn ("the most persuasive seems inarticulate"). This is because such individuals harbor no extreme competitive thoughts in their hearts. Their inner clarity remains untainted by external things, their stillness undisturbed by agitation—such a mental state naturally maintains perfect equilibrium.

The text then cites interpretations from several Daoist scholars: Master Dazhen observes this as the inevitable manifestation of natural law; Ye Mengde points out that uprightness means correcting what is crooked, and clarity is the true standard of the world; Huang Maocai explains that the human body contains its own microcosm, and understanding the way of clarity allows connection with the Taiji (Supreme Ultimate, the cosmic origin), eliminating any need for deliberate conquest.

Finally, the text contrasts "when the world follows the Dao" with "when the world lacks the Dao": In times of peace (when the Dao prevails), warhorses are used for plowing fields; in times of chaos (without the Dao), warhorses are bred on battlefields. This demonstrates how governance through the Dao brings prosperity without contention, while its absence leads to survival of the fittest, where even territorial boundaries cannot be maintained.

 道謂時之否也强弱相陵人皆失業習尚  戰爭自然戎馬生于郊境之上  道眞仁靜先生曹道沖曰去走馬以息戰  民耕桑以糞田内若意馬不馳丹田自實  如不務道則好兵則戎馬生於郊野  達眞子曰走馬者亡戰之馬也戎馬者備  戰之馬也國之戰敵皆棄道徇欲所致之  然也天下有道無所事於戰敵故却其走  馬則同於糞壤天下無道有所事於戰故  戎馬生於郊  清源子劉驥曰莊子所謂野馬塵埃以馬  喻氣也揚子亦言氣也者所以適善惡之  馬也歟氣之盛衰繫心動靜心靜氣正心  動氣奔有道之士其心既靜其氣徐清其  息自减從减至無凝然自定故却走馬以  糞糞者糞其根本謂其歸根返本也天下  無道忘道逐物其心既動其氣自奔嗜慾  氣邪妄想氣亂故戎馬生於郊莊子所謂  坐馳亦此之謂也  黄茂材曰至治之世以道莅天下何用走  馬却以糞宜矣及其有事且急也非戎馬  無以遏亂略乃使生於近郊蓋有不得已  焉如人日衰疾病間作捨醫藥不可夫攝  生者而至於用醫藥其於道不亦遠乎 罪莫大於可欲禍莫大於不知足咎莫大於 欲得故知足之足常足矣  御註曰人見可欲則不知足不知足則欲  得欲得則爭端起而禍亂作禍亂作則戎  馬生於郊然則知足而各安其性命之分
Interpretation

This passage discusses the relationship between the Dao and warfare as well as desires. When society deviates from the Great Dao, conflicts between the strong and weak emerge, people become displaced, and warfare naturally breaks out—warhorses (rongma) then appear in the borderlands.

Cao Daochong (a Daoist master of the Song Dynasty) explains: Ceasing the use of warhorses (zouma) to quell warfare and allowing people to peacefully till the land is akin to stilling the "horse of thought" (a metaphor for distracting thoughts) during cultivation—when the mind settles, the Dantian (energy center) naturally becomes replenished. If one abandons the Dao and indulges in force, warhorses will inevitably appear in the borderlands.

Da Zhenzi (a Daoist master of the Yuan Dynasty) further distinguishes: Zouma refers to horses used for fleeing battle, while rongma are those bred for warfare. Conflicts between nations all stem from abandoning the Dao and indulging desires. When the world follows the Dao, warfare becomes unnecessary, and warhorses return to the fields like manure; when the world loses the Dao, preparation for war becomes inevitable, and warhorses appear in the borderlands.

Liu Ji (styled Qingyuanzi, a Song Dynasty scholar) quotes Zhuangzi, using the metaphor of "wild horses and swirling dust" to describe human Qi (vital energy). The rise and fall of Qi depends on the movement or stillness of the mind: when the mind is calm, Qi becomes harmonious; when the mind is agitated, Qi surges wildly. Practitioners of the Dao with purified thoughts will find their Qi gradually clarifying, their breath slowing until it ceases, reaching a state of deep stillness. This is the deeper meaning of "returning warhorses to manure"—a return to the root. When the world loses the Dao, people chase external things, their minds become restless, and perverse Qi runs wild, much like warhorses appearing in the borderlands. This is what Zhuangzi meant by "the body sits while the mind gallops."

Huang Maocai (a Song Dynasty scholar) argues: In times of peace, governing the world with the Dao naturally eliminates the need for warhorses, making their return to farming proper. But when rebellion arises in chaotic times, keeping warhorses near the capital becomes unavoidable—just as people who neglect health cultivation only seek medicine when illness strikes, already far from the Dao of nurturing life.

Finally, the passage quotes a famous saying from the Daode Jing: The greatest sin is indulging desires, the greatest calamity is discontent, and the gravest fault is insatiable greed. Only those who know contentment can attain true fulfillment. Emperor Huizong of Song notes in his commentary: When people see what they desire, they become discontent; discontent breeds possessiveness, sparking conflict and disaster, ultimately leading to war. Only by understanding contentment can each person abide peacefully in their proper place.

 無所施其智巧也日用飲食而已何爭亂  之有  碧虚子陳景元曰犯法爲罪夫人有欲愛  之心者則非理貪求奔馳而不反是故逐  秋毫之微者失大山之重爲罪之因莫重  乎可欲也列子曰齊人有欲金者清旦衣  冠而之市適鬻金者之所因攫其金而去  吏捕得之問曰人皆在焉子攫人之金何  對曰取金之時不見人徒見金夫觀於濁  水而迷於清淵者不照也禍害也可欲者  於貪求之中尚有數耳不知足者凡經歷  於目而無一可捨滿不知損亡敗及之故  禍釁之發莫大乎不知足也咎殃咎也物  之經目猶有限也天下之物見與不見咸  欲得之使盡在己而靡有孑遺者此無道  之甚也小則害身大則喪國得不戒哉  潁濱蘇轍曰匹夫有一於身患必及之侯  王而爲是必戎馬之所自起也知足者所  遇而足故無不足也  臨川王安石曰墨子曰非無安居也我無  足心也非無足財也我無足心也萬物常  至於足而有所謂不足者以其無足心也  得道者知其足心足財故曰知足之足常  足矣  道眞仁靜先生曹道沖曰不知足者足亦  不足知足則不足常足  達眞子曰罪者人加也禍者鬼責也咎者  天伐也人之罪未深於鬼禍鬼之禍未深  於天之殃咎也凡無道徇欲者必致乎此  知足者足於道而不足於物足於内而不
Interpretation

This passage illustrates how insatiable greed inevitably brings calamity.

Master Bi Xu (Chen Jingyuan) explains that when greed arises in people, they abandon moral principles to chase external possessions. It's like pursuing a single strand of hair while losing sight of the entire mountain. Greed is the root of all transgressions. He recounts Liezi's parable: A man from Qi dressed formally and stole gold from a shop in broad daylight. When caught, he confessed seeing only the gold, blind to all witnesses. Like muddy water obscuring clear depths, desire clouds human judgment. The perpetually dissatisfied view everything as potential plunder, inevitably courting disaster.

Su Zhe (Master Yingbin) adds that while greed destroys ordinary people, an unsatisfied ruler provokes wars. The contented find sufficiency in all circumstances.

Wang Anshi (Master Linchuan) quotes Mozi: "It's not that we lack shelter, but that hearts feel insufficient; not that goods are scarce, but that greed is boundless." Those who attain the Dao understand true wealth lies in contentment.

Cao Daochong (Master Dao Zhen Ren Jing) states succinctly: "The insatiable never have enough; the contented always feel abundant despite lack."

Master Da Zhen analyzes through karmic lens: Transgressions invite human punishment, reckless desires summon ghostly retribution, and excesses incur heavenly wrath. True contentment means finding fulfillment in the Dao itself—when the inner self is nourished, external gains or losses matter not.

 足於外是以舉無不足也故知足之足則  常足矣若是則奚有罪禍咎之及己哉  清源子劉驥曰人之有欲至於决性命之  情以爭之故罪莫大於可欲若不知足則  攘奪誕謾無所不至故禍莫大於不知足  欲得則所欲必得恣縱之甚殃咎尤大然  此三事不過衣食適身充口之外皆是餘  物故繼之以知足知足則定乎性命之分  逍遥於天地之間而心意自得何禍咎之  有故知足之足常足矣  黄茂材曰人有三患可欲也不知足也欲  得也一性之内無欠無餘人能知之無適  不足  程大昌曰可讀當如許可之可人之有欲  者不加制遏顧乃自恕自許以爲無害者  也世人縱欲而不知足者未必不幸於一  勝所欲既遂則秦人盡兼天下而還以兵  亡是其禍也漢文帝之罷露臺也自言其  心曰吾奉先帝宫室常恐羞之何以臺爲  及其謝諸將用兵則又曰朕能勝衣冠念  不到此故雖拊髀嘆頗牧飲食念鉅鹿而  十萬横行可樂之言終不聽也武帝繼之  奢侈踰於古初郡縣亘乎四夷而哆然未  厭也由後世言之文帝爲足乎武帝爲足  乎    不出户章第四十七 不出户知天下不窺牖見天道  碧虚子陳景元曰當食而思天下之飢當  衣而思天下之寒愛其親知天下之有耆  老憐其子知天下之有稚幼夫如是又何  出户而知天下哉
Interpretation

When external material conditions are fulfilled, one's actions will never fall short. Thus, only those who understand contentment can attain true fulfillment. How, then, could misfortune or calamity ever befall them?

Master Liu Ji of Qingyuan explains: When human desires escalate to the point of harming life itself in pursuit of gain, no greater evil exists than indulging these cravings. Those who never know satisfaction will resort to plunder and deceit without restraint—hence the greatest disaster stems from insatiability. To insist on obtaining whatever one desires, indulging to the extreme, invites particularly grave misfortune. In truth, these three faults (indulging desires, lacking contentment, and compulsive acquisition) are nothing more than excess beyond the basic needs of food, clothing, and warmth. Therefore, the text proceeds to discuss the principle of contentment—those who are content remain settled in their proper place, wandering freely between heaven and earth with fulfilled hearts. What calamity could possibly reach them? Thus it is said: The contented are forever abundant.

Huang Maocai identifies three great human afflictions: indulging desires, lacking satisfaction, and insatiable greed. Human nature is originally complete and flawless—understanding this truth alone prevents any sense of deficiency.

Cheng Dachang interprets the "permissible" (可) in "permissible desires" as "sanctioned." When people harbor desires yet impose no restraint, pardoning and indulging themselves while dismissing potential harm, misfortune inevitably follows. Consider the First Emperor of Qin: after unifying the realm, his relentless militarism destroyed his dynasty—such is calamity. Contrast this with Emperor Wen of Han, who abandoned plans for a terrace, declaring: "Living in my predecessor's palace already shames me—why build more?" When generals urged military campaigns, he replied: "I feel unworthy even wearing these robes—how could I contemplate such things?" Though he might sigh while touching his thigh, wishing for generals like Lian Po or Li Mu, or recall the Battle of Julu during meals, he consistently rejected pleas for vast armies to dominate the world. When Emperor Wu succeeded him, his extravagance surpassed all predecessors as his territories expanded to distant frontiers—yet still he remained unsatisfied. Posterity judges: Emperor Wen knew contentment—did Emperor Wu?

Chapter 47 discusses understanding the world without stepping outside:

Without leaving your gate, you comprehend the world's affairs; without peering through your window, you perceive the Dao of heaven.

Master Chen Jingyuan of Bixu clarifies: While eating, think of those starving; while dressing, remember those freezing. Cherishing your own parents reveals the plight of elders everywhere; loving your children illuminates the condition of all young ones. Why then must one go abroad to understand the world?

 涑水司馬光曰得其宗本  潁濱蘇轍曰性之爲體充遍宇宙無遠近  古今之異古之聖人其所以不出户牖而  無所不知者特其性全故耳  陸佃曰萬物皆備於我有天道焉有地道  焉有人道焉  葉夢得曰雖山河不能爲之礙况户牖乎  黄茂材曰天地萬物其道一也  林東曰撫我則后虐我則讎天下之心何  難知之有所福者善所禍者淫天之道何  難見之有此其不出户亦可知不窺牖亦  可見 其出彌遠其知彌少  御註曰去道彌遠所知彌少矣  涑水司馬光曰去本逐末  潁濱蘇轍曰世之人爲物所蔽性分於耳  目内爲身心之所紛亂外爲山河之所障  塞見不出視聞不出聽户牖之微能蔽而  絶之不知聖人復性而足乃欲出而求之  是以彌遠而彌少也  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰雖遠愈迷  葉夢得曰有不能達則播糠眯目天地且  爲之易位  清源子劉驥曰離靜而動故其知彌少 是以聖人不行而知不見而名不爲而成  碧虚子陳景元曰蓋由得之於身心而施  之萬事  涑水司馬光曰至理不易  潁濱蘇轍曰性之所及非特能知能名而  已蓋可以因物之自然不勞而成之矣   道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰契理即知何必  親見  林東曰亦道在邇而求諸遠意    爲學日益章第四十八
Interpretation

Sima Guang (Master Sushui) stated: Grasping the fundamental essence of the Dao is of utmost importance. Su Zhe (Master Yingbin) observed: The nature of the Dao (Dao-xing) permeates all heaven and earth, transcending the constraints of time and space. The ancient sages could comprehend all things without leaving their dwellings precisely because their Dao-nature remained whole and unimpaired.

Lu Dian proposed: All things are contained within my mind, encompassing the principles of celestial order, terrestrial laws, and human ethics. Ye Mengde added: Not even towering mountains and vast rivers can obstruct the movement of the Dao—how much less mere doors and windows? Huang Maocai pointed out: Heaven, earth, and the myriad things all follow the same fundamental law. Lin Dong illustrated with a metaphor: Treating the people with kindness makes one a wise ruler, while oppressing them makes one an enemy—the inclinations of human hearts are easily understood; virtuous deeds bring blessings, while indulgence invites calamity—the patterns of the Dao of heaven are equally clear. Thus, the sage has no need to step outside to observe, nor to peer through windows.

The farther one travels, the less one truly knows. Emperor Huizong of Song (Imperial Commentary) explained: The farther one strays from the Dao, the shallower one’s understanding becomes. Sima Guang saw this as a case of neglecting the root while chasing the branches. Su Zhe further analyzed: Ordinary people are blinded by external things—their inner selves are disturbed by sensory desires, while outwardly they are obstructed by mountains and rivers, confining their perception to a narrow scope. Unaware that the sage attains fulfillment by restoring his innate nature, they instead seek outwardly, and thus the farther they go, the less they comprehend.

Cao Daochong (Master Dao Zhen Ren Jing) remarked: Traveling far only leads to greater confusion. Ye Mengde likened it to having one’s vision obscured by chaff—even the directions of heaven and earth become confused. Liu Ji (Master Qingyuan) observed: Turning away from stillness to pursue external things naturally diminishes understanding. Therefore, the sage knows without experiencing firsthand, understands without seeing with his eyes, and accomplishes through non-action (Wuwei). Chen Jingyuan (Master Bixu) explained: This is because the sage apprehends the great Dao through inner realization, enabling him to respond effortlessly to all things.

Sima Guang emphasized: The highest truth is eternal and unchanging. Su Zhe added: A complete Dao-nature not only discerns and names all things but also aligns with natural principles to achieve goals effortlessly. Cao Daochong said: If one is in harmony with the Dao, why must one see with one’s own eyes? Lin Dong concluded: This is like searching afar when the Dao is right at hand.

The chapter "Increasing Knowledge Through Study" (Chapter 48) unfolds layer by layer, revealing the essential practice of "turning inward and illuminating the self"—external pursuits only distance one from innate wisdom, while returning to the stillness of one’s true nature allows one to perceive the profound principles of heaven and earth.

爲學日益爲道曰損損之又損以至於無爲 而無不爲矣  御註曰學以致其道始乎爲士終乎爲聖  日加益而道積于厥躬孔子謂顔淵曰吾  見其進也致道者墮支體黜聰明離形去  智而萬事銷忘故日損  潁濱蘇轍曰苟一日知道顧視萬物無一  非妄  臨川王安石曰爲學者窮理也爲道者盡  性也性在物謂之理則天下之理無不得  故曰日益天下之理宜存之於無故曰日  損窮理盡性必至於復命故損之又損之  以至於無爲者復命也然命不亟復也必  至於消之復之然後至於命故曰損之又  損之以至於無爲然無爲也亦未嘗不爲  故曰無爲而無不爲  陸佃曰爲學日益此智者也爲道日損此  仁者也損之又損之至於無爲而無不爲  聖人也智者所以窮理而將以增其所無  仁者所以盡性而將以减其所有故有曰  損若夫聖人則所謂至命者也無所不有  故無日益無所不益故無曰損  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰損者减也世之  學求之於外外事紛葩故尚於多知博聞  日加其能以遊名利之場道之學者其志  在内内事簡直故貴於息心養氣日踐其  事以遊道德之鄉勞役精神氣血皆以削  除减之損之以至無爲無事  陳象古曰學者有漸從少至多故曰有益  道成則藏其用秘其明故曰曰損
Interpretation

In acquiring knowledge, one accumulates daily, while in cultivating the Dao (the Way), one diminishes daily. Continue diminishing until reaching the state of Wuwei (non-action). Only upon attaining Wuwei can one then accomplish all things effortlessly.

Emperor Huizong of Song (in his imperial commentary) explains: Learning is the pursuit of the great Dao, beginning as a scholar and ultimately becoming a sage. By accumulating knowledge daily, the Dao gradually settles within oneself. Confucius said of Yan Hui: "I observe his progress." Those who seek the Dao must relinquish attachment to the senses, discard intellectual cleverness, transcend physical form and conscious thought, and allow all things to dissolve naturally into oblivion—hence the principle of "daily diminishment."

Su Zhe (Yingbin) remarks: Once one comprehends the Dao in a single moment, looking back upon the myriad things of the world, none will appear as anything but illusory.

Wang Anshi (Linchuan) states: The purpose of study is to exhaustively investigate principle, while the purpose of cultivating the Dao is to fully manifest one's innate nature. This nature expresses itself through phenomena as principle—thus, mastering the principles of all things is called "daily accumulation." Yet all principles ultimately return to emptiness—hence the term "daily diminishment." To exhaust principle and fulfill one's nature is to ultimately return to the Mandate of Heaven. However, this return does not happen instantly; it requires continuous refinement and repeated practice—hence the phrase "diminish and diminish again, until Wuwei is attained." Once Wuwei is realized, action arises spontaneously—hence "through non-action, nothing is left undone."

Lu Dian observes: Daily accumulation in learning is the method of the wise, while daily diminishment in Dao cultivation is the method of the benevolent. To diminish ceaselessly until reaching Wuwei, where nothing remains unaccomplished, is the realm of the sage. The wise exhaust principle to acquire what they lack, while the benevolent fulfill their nature to shed what they already possess. As for the sage, they embody the Mandate of Heaven—already possessing all, they need no "daily accumulation"; already perfected, they require no "daily diminishment."

Cao Daochong (Master Daozhen Renjing) explains: "Diminishment" means reduction. Ordinary people pursue learning outwardly, chasing the complexity of external affairs—thus they esteem erudition and daily expand their skills in pursuit of fame and profit. Practitioners of the Dao turn their aspirations inward, seeking simplicity and directness, emphasizing stillness to nourish Qi (vital energy). They practice daily, wandering freely in the realm of Dao and De (Virtue). They must pare away the exhaustion of Qi and blood caused by mental strain, diminishing continuously until reaching the state of Wuwei, where no effort is needed.

Chen Xianggu notes: Learning is a gradual process, moving from little to much—hence it is called "accumulation." Yet once the Dao is realized, one must conceal its function and withdraw its brilliance—hence it is called "daily diminishment."

 黄茂材曰無所不知而後可以言學故學  欲日益忘其所知而後可以言道故道欲  日損益者易進損者難忘損而未能忘其  損未爲損也損之而忘其損乃可至於無  爲之地  潁濱蘇轍曰無所不爲而不失於無爲矣 故取天下者常以無事及其有事不足以取 天下  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰以道自治無心  而天下自服法以係之力以率之智以籠  之威以加之故有不服之者天下者通言  萬物也  達眞子曰無心則無爲無爲則無事舜禹  有天下而不與蓋其無心及於無爲無爲  及於無事故也  潁濱蘇轍曰人皆有欲取天下之心故造  事而求之心見於外而物惡之故終不可  得聖人無爲故無事其心見於外而物安  之雖不取天下而天下歸之矣  黄茂材曰深於道者爲無爲事無事若其  有事豈足以取天下    聖人無常心章第四十九 聖人無常心以百姓心爲心  御註曰聖人之心萬物之照也虚而能受  靜而能應疏觀萬物而知其情因民而已  此之謂以百姓心爲心莊子曰卑而不可  不因者民也  碧虚子陳景元曰聖人體道無爲虚心待  物物感斯應應其所感感既不一故應無  常心莊子曰至人之用心若鏡不將不迎  應而不藏故能勝物而不傷此乃聖人無  常心也  潁濱蘇轍曰虚空無形因萬物之形以爲
Interpretation

Huang Maocai said that one must first attain omniscience before one can truly speak of learning. Thus, study requires daily accumulation of knowledge. However, to comprehend the true meaning of the Dao, one must gradually forget acquired knowledge, because the realm of the Dao demands the continual shedding of attachments. Reducing attachments may seem easy, but truly forgetting is difficult. If one superficially diminishes attachments while still clinging to them inwardly, it does not count as genuine reduction. Only when one completely forgets that they are reducing can they attain the state of Wuwei (non-action).

Su Zhe (styled Yingbin) added that true Wuwei is not about doing nothing but maintaining a Wuwei mindset while acting. Therefore, those who govern the world often appear to do nothing, while deliberate action makes them unworthy of leadership.

Cao Daochong (styled Daozhen Renjing Xiansheng) believed that cultivating oneself with the Dao and maintaining a desireless heart naturally brings the world into harmony. If one relies on laws, force, schemes, or coercion, there will always be dissent. Here, "the world" refers to all things in existence.

Da Zhenzi pointed out that a desireless heart naturally gives rise to Wuwei, and Wuwei naturally leads to non-interference. Shun and Yu possessed the world without striving for it precisely because they maintained a desireless heart, achieved Wuwei, and thereby attained non-interference.

Su Zhe further explained that ordinary people have a desire to compete for the world, thus creating disturbances through forceful demands. This overt desire invites resentment and ultimately leads to failure. Sages maintain Wuwei and thus remain free from affairs. When their mental state manifests outwardly, all things naturally settle into place. Though they do not strive, the world submits to them.

Huang Maocai concluded that those deeply versed in the Dao appear to take no action when acting and seem effortless when handling affairs. If one acts deliberately, how can they be worthy of governing the world?

Chapter 49 of the Daodejing states: "The sage has no fixed mind; they take the mind of the people as their own." The imperial commentary explains that the sage's mind is like a mirror reflecting all things—empty and tranquil, capable of receiving everything; calm and composed, able to respond to all changes. They understand reality by observing all things and fully comply with the needs of the people. Zhuangzi also said: "What seems lowly yet must be followed is precisely the people."

Chen Jingyuan (styled Bixuzi) elaborated that sages embody the Wuwei state of the Dao, treating all things with an open mind. When things resonate, the sage responds accordingly. Because perceptions vary, responses also lack fixed patterns. Zhuangzi said: "The mind of the ultimate person is like a mirror—it neither sends nor welcomes, reflects without leaving traces, and thus can respond to all things without harm." This is the meaning of the sage having no fixed preconceptions.

Su Zhe used the mirror as a metaphor: emptiness itself has no form but borrows the shapes of things to manifest images; the sage has no subjective will but acts entirely in accordance with the will of the people.

 形在方爲方在圓爲圓如使空自有形則  何以形萬物哉是以聖人無心因百姓之  心以爲心  臨川王安石曰聖人無心故無思無爲雖  然無思也未嘗不思無爲也未嘗不爲以  吉凶與民同患故也  黄茂材曰有常德有常道何獨無常心有  常德有常道所以處己無常心所以處世  天下之人如此其不一也而使其心皆如  吾之心豈不繁然亂哉故聖人不以己之  心爲心而以百姓之心爲心欲與天下大  同也歟 善者吾善之不善者吾亦善之德善矣信者 吾信之不信者吾亦信之德信矣  御註曰善否相非誕信相譏世俗之情自  爲同異豈德也哉德善則見百行無非善  者故不善者亦善之德信則見萬情無非  信者故不信者亦信之眞僞兩忘是非一  致是全德之人此舜之於象所以誠信而  喜之  潁濱蘇轍曰無善不善皆善之無信不信  皆信之善不善信不信在彼而吾之所以  善之信之者未嘗渝也可謂德善德信矣  不然善善而棄不善信信而棄不信豈所  謂常善救人而無棄人哉  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰爾善吾豈不以  爲善而爾自不善吾亦善之爾信吾固信  之爾雖無信吾亦信之  黄茂材曰善其善不善其不善則所善者  寡矣信其信不信其不信則所信者狹矣  天下之大人物之衆敦善敦不善敦信敦
Interpretation

This scripture discusses the way of being for sages. Wang Anshi explains that sages have no fixed mind, therefore they neither deliberately think nor act (Wuwei). However, "no thought" does not mean complete absence of thought, nor does "non-action" mean complete inaction. Rather, they think and act in accordance with the will of the people, sharing both joy and hardship with them.

Huang Maocai further elaborates: one should possess constant virtue (Chang De) and principles (Chang Dao), yet need not cling to personal opinions (Wu Chang Xin). People under heaven are all different—if one insists that everyone must think alike, it will only create chaos. Therefore, sages do not stubbornly hold to their own views but take the people's hearts as their measure, aspiring to achieve harmony with all under heaven.

Regarding how to treat good and evil, sincerity and deception: the scripture states that I treat the good with goodness, and I also treat the not-good with goodness—this is true "virtuous goodness" (De Shan); I trust the trustworthy, and I also trust the untrustworthy—this is true "virtuous trust" (De Xin). Emperor Huizong of Song (in his Imperial Commentary) notes that worldly people always distinguish between good and evil, truth and falsehood, accusing one another, but those with perfected virtue transcend such distinctions, treating all with sincerity—just as Shun treated his brother Xiang.

Su Zhe (Yingbin) argues that regardless of whether others are good or trustworthy, sages treat them with the same unchanging kindness and trust. If one only treats the good with goodness and only trusts the trustworthy, it violates the principle of "constantly saving people without abandoning anyone." Both Cao Daochong and Huang Maocai emphasize that if one only approves of goodness and trustworthiness while rejecting the not-good and the untrustworthy, the scope of acceptance becomes far too narrow. Faced with the vast multitude of people under heaven, who can clearly distinguish who is good and who is not, who is trustworthy and who is not? The sage's heart should embrace all.

 不信聖人未嘗有棄物之心故善者吾善  之不善者吾亦善之未嘗有疑物之心故  信者吾信之不信者吾亦信之夫然則吾  心之中無適而非善信是爲德善德信 聖人之在天下惵惵爲天下渾心百姓皆注 其耳目聖人皆孩之  御註曰方其在天下則吉凶與民同患雖  無常心而不可以不戒故所以爲己則惵  惵然不自暇逸所以爲天下則齊善否同  信誕兩忘而閉其所譽渾然而已聖人作  而萬物睹故百姓皆注其耳目百姓惟聖  人之視聽則聖人者民之父母也矜憐撫  奄若保赤子而仁覆天下  碧虚子陳景元曰惵惵憂勤貌又不停貌  渾者無分别也陸希聲曰聖人在天下𢡁  然應彼物感未嘗少息而其心渾然與天  下爲一未嘗自有所爲故仲尼之所絶者  有四謂無意無必無固無我是以能無可  無不可無爲無不爲也河上公本作怵怵  王弼本作歙歙註傾也聖人以無爲德化  不逆萬物之情故百姓被其聖德而各遂  其能明者爲視聰者爲聽皆傾注其耳目  以效聖人自然之法而聖人冕旒垂目黈  纊塞耳不勞身於聰明不察物於幽隱撫  念蒼生皆如赤子寧忍以事騷撓惟孩之  而已矣  潁濱蘇轍曰天下善惡信偽方各自是以  相非相賊不知所定聖人憂之故惵惵爲  天下渾其心無善惡無信僞皆以一待之
Interpretation

This passage from the Daode Jing describes the attitude of sages (those who have attained the Dao) toward all things. The sage's heart is as all-encompassing as heaven and earth—they treat the virtuous with kindness, and likewise treat the unvirtuous with kindness; they grant trust to the trustworthy, and also grant trust to the untrustworthy. This is because the "kindness" and "trust" in the sage's heart are not directed at specific individuals but are the natural expression of their innate nature, representing the highest form of De (Virtue/Power).

When sages dwell in the world, they always maintain a cautious and diligent attitude, regarding the hearts of all people as one. The common people observe the words and actions of the sage, while the sage nurtures everyone as if they were infants. As Emperor Huizong of Song noted in his commentary: The sage shares both joy and suffering with the people. Though their inner mind is empty and unattached, they remain ever vigilant. They maintain strict self-discipline while treating the world with impartiality, seeing beyond distinctions of good and evil, truth and falsehood—eliminating all discriminating thought.

Chen Jingyuan (Master Bixu) explains that the term "diede" (惵惵) describes the sage's state of constant diligence and tireless effort, while "hunxin" (浑心) refers to a mind free from discrimination. Lu Xisheng adds that the sage responds to the transformations of all things while their inner being remains unified with heaven and earth. This resembles the state Confucius described as "free from willfulness, absoluteness, stubbornness, and ego," allowing them to follow the natural course and achieve Wuwei (non-action) that accomplishes all things.

The versions by Heshang Gong and Wang Bi differ slightly in wording but convey the same meaning: The sage teaches all beings through Wuwei, never violating their innate nature. Influenced by this, the people naturally follow the sage's way—the sharp-eyed employ their vision, the keen-eared employ their hearing. Yet the sage themselves lowers their gaze and stops their ears (symbolized by the jade beads of the imperial crown obscuring sight and yellow silk plugs blocking partial hearing), deliberately refraining from using cleverness or prying into hidden matters. Instead, they care for all beings like infants, unwilling to disturb them with worldly concerns.

Su Zhe (Yingbin) interprets it thus: In the world, good and evil, truth and falsehood each cling to their own views and attack one another. Troubled by this, the sage responds with a mind that merges all distinctions—transcending divisions of good and evil, truth and falsehood—embracing all with the same impartial heart.

 彼方注其耳目以觀聖人之予奪而吾一  以嬰兒遇之於善無所喜於惡無所嫉夫  是以善者不矜惡者不愠釋然皆化而天  下始定矣  王雱曰惵惵者恐懼之意聖人以天下爲  心所以建立萬法天下以聖人爲心所以  歸復大道心者能覺知分别而聖人務使  人復於無知故曰渾心也一本作歙歙歙  歙收斂之意亦通也  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰聖人忘言不得  已而惵惵垂誨欲令天下之心渾合爲一  至言皆注知於百姓耳目冀其開悟哀憐  愚昩之至也聖人欲令其去澆競皆返孩  稚之樸此聖人視赤子之至誠如是  達眞子曰惵惵者恐畏之謂也聖人之在  天下常恐畏其人之不善欲使之皆善常  恐畏其人之不信欲使之皆信故善者應  不善者亦應信者應不信者亦應故爲天  下渾其心則此所謂無常心也若是則百  姓皆注其耳則莫不聽也百姓皆注其目  則莫不視也百姓視聽皆一仰於聖人者  何哉以聖人皆孩之也故曰聖人皆孩之  陳象古曰言百姓隨教順治未有所能如  孩童之就乳不難率也  黄茂材曰謂之聖人出而與民同患者也  天下之人敦不注其耳目今也惵惵然渾  其心無所是非無所好惡可以使民由之  而不知孩者未有知也  程大昌曰若嬰兒之未孩則孩也者又嬰  兒之稚者也孟子曰大人不失赤子之心
Interpretation

This passage discusses the wisdom of sages in governing the world. The sage does not deliberately use senses to judge people's good or bad deeds, but maintains an innocent mind like that towards an infant—neither becoming overly joyful upon seeing good deeds nor easily angered by witnessing wrongdoing. Thus, virtuous people won't become arrogant, and wrongdoers won't harbor resentment. All are naturally influenced, and the world becomes peaceful.

Commentators offer various interpretations:

Wang Pang explains that "戒慎恐惧" (cautious vigilance) means the sage establishes laws while bearing the world's burdens, and people follow the sage's example to return to the Dao. The sage does not encourage discrimination but guides people back to the original state of undifferentiated unity.

Cao Daochong suggests the sage would prefer not to speak much but must instruct the world with concern. Using simple truths to enlighten people, they treat them like ignorant children needing compassion, hoping to eliminate competitive minds and restore infant-like simplicity.

Da Zhenzi points out that when governing, sages constantly worry people might not practice virtue or keep faith. Therefore, they treat both virtuous and unvirtuous, trustworthy and untrustworthy individuals equally—this is the state of "浑其心" (unifying the heart). People naturally focus on the sage because all are regarded as innocent children.

Other commentators add: people follow the sage's teachings as instinctively as infants cling to their mothers. The sage's ability to share the same heart-mind with the people stems from maintaining childlike purity. As Mencius said: "The great man never loses the heart of a newborn babe."

 者也則赤子也者取其方爲嬰兒而眞淳  尤爲未散者也百姓既注其耳目而聖人  遂求有以復其赤子之初    岀生入死章第五十 出生入死  御註曰萬物皆出於機入於機天機自張  與出俱生天機自止與入俱死生者造化  之所始死者陰陽之所變  碧虚子陳景元曰未出乎域中者也  涑水司馬光曰出生地則入死地  潁濱蘇轍曰性無生死出則爲生入則爲  死 生之徒十有三死之徒十有三民之生動之 死地亦十有三  碧虚子陳景元曰徒類也生之徒謂攝生  者之類也死之徒謂趣死者之類也十有  三者韓非曰四支與九竅十有三動靜屬  於生死焉夫善攝生者目不妄視於采色  耳不妄聽於淫聲鼻不妄嗅於穢膻口不  妄言於非道手不妄持於凶器足不妄履  於邪徑動靜翛然諸惡莫犯此乃長生之  徒也趣死者目亂於采色耳耽於淫聲鼻  因於穢膻口美於非道手便於凶器足捷  於邪徑動靜没溺諸吉無有此乃近死之  徒也夫生死之原皆係此十三事矣孫登  曰天地之物有生之類順理者寡逆理者  衆故十分之中順理者三耳夫生不以道  死不以理順生者尟則逆死者多故死之  中順命者三耳或解云三業十惡能制伏  者長生之徒放縱者近死之徒以理推之  九竅四支最長
Interpretation

This passage explores two core concepts: the "Heart of a Newborn" and the "Dao of Life and Death."

Regarding the "Heart of a Newborn": This refers to a state of pure, natural innocence like that of an infant. Ordinary people become distracted by external phenomena ("fixating their eyes and ears"), while sages seek to return to this primordial state of purity ("the beginning of a newborn").

Concerning the "Dao of Life and Death": All things follow natural laws ("heavenly mechanism") in their arising and perishing. Birth marks the inception of creation, while death represents the transformation of Yin-Yang. Both life and death occur within the framework of natural order ("never departing from the cosmic domain").

The text particularly analyzes the significance of the number "thirteen":

  • It refers to the thirteen bodily components (four limbs and nine orifices)
  • Those skilled in nurturing life ("life-preservers") can master these organs: eyes avoiding lascivious sights, ears shunning wanton sounds, noses rejecting foul odors, mouths refraining from false speech, hands not grasping lethal weapons, and feet not treading wicked paths. Thus they avoid calamities and attain longevity.
  • Conversely, those indulging sensory desires ("death-seekers") hasten their demise.

Sun Deng further explains: Among all worldly phenomena, few follow natural principles ("those complying with reason are scarce"), roughly only three in ten. Most people live contrary to these laws, hence only three in ten deaths constitute natural endings. Some interpretations suggest this refers to controlling the three karmic actions (body, speech, and mind) and ten evil deeds.

In essence, this scripture teaches returning to fundamental authenticity, extending life through sensory discipline, and living in accordance with natural laws.

 涑水司馬光曰言十人之中大約柔弱以  保其生者三剛强以速其死者三雖志在  愛生而不免於趨死者亦三其所以愛生  而趨死者由其自奉養太厚故也  潁濱蘇轍曰用物取精以自滋養者生之  徒也聲色臭味以自賊戕者死之徒也二  者既分生死之道矣吾又知作而不知休  知言而不知默知思而不知忘以趣於盡  則所謂動而之死地者也生死之道以十  言之三者各居其三矣豈非生死之道九  而不生不死之道一而已乎不生不死則  易所謂寂然不動者也老子言其九不言  其一使人自得之以寄無思無爲之妙也  臨川王安石曰有求生以惡滅者生之徒  十有三是也有求滅而惡生者死之徒十  有三是也有生無異於死者動之死地亦  十有三是也惟其不悟眞滅眞生是以不  脱輪回故曰生之徒十有三死之徒十有  三動之死地亦十有三  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰修生者若奉黄  老之道求長生不死者也亦十中或有三  得之死之徒若奉釋氏修無生寂滅之道  亦十中或有三得之既不達黄老長生之  旨又不悟釋氏無生之性故其數終則死  而枉縱之人不得天數凡所動作皆趨速  死之地又非修無生不往不來之法皆以  嗜慾動則就虧神損道之地十中亦有三  以此而自致傷夭之者
Interpretation

Sima Guang (Northern Song statesman) observed that among ten people, roughly three types of situations exist: three preserve life through gentle interaction with the world, three hasten death through forceful actions, and another three, despite desiring longevity, still meet premature death. Those who seek longevity yet perish do so because of excessive pursuit of material comforts.

Su Zhe (Northern Song literatus) added: Using external things moderately to nourish the body constitutes the Dao of nurturing life, while indulging in sensual pleasures that harm oneself represents the path to death. These two roads clearly distinguish life from death. Yet people often know only labor without rest, excel in speech but understand not silence, overthink without releasing mental burdens—such behaviors only accelerate their march toward death. If we calculate the Dao of life and death among ten people, with each of the three conditions accounting for three, doesn't this suggest the ways of life and death occupy nine parts, while the state transcending life and death constitutes but one? That "neither-born-nor-dead" realm corresponds to what the Book of Changes describes as "tranquil and unmoving." Laozi only explained ninety percent, deliberately withholding the remaining ten percent to prompt people to realize for themselves the mystery of no-thought and Wuwei (non-action).

Wang Anshi (Northern Song reformer) analyzed: Among ten people, three desperately seek life yet achieve the opposite effect; three actively court death and detest existence; another three live as walking corpses. Precisely because they fail to comprehend the true Dao of life and death, they cannot escape cyclical rebirth. Thus seekers of life, seekers of death, and the living dead each account for thirty percent.

Cao Daochong (Daoist master) explained from an alchemical perspective: Roughly three in ten cultivate the Huang-Lao arts of longevity (Daoist cultivation methods), while three practice Buddhism's path of cessation (Buddhist cultivation methods). The remainder understand neither Daoist truths of eternal life nor Buddhism's intrinsic nature of non-birth, ultimately unable to escape death. As for those who indulge desires and violate natural laws—their every action hastens demise, and lacking methods to transcend life and death—three in ten thus bring about their own destruction.

 三峩了一子李文惒曰夫坎水子位在人  爲腎宜實而不宜虚元陽復還之生門也  離火午位在人爲心宜虚而不宜實衆陰  剥陽之死户也是以人能修坎則生役離  則死故攝生者悟精氣之生身在乎坎妄  念之喪神在乎離故自少至老一周十二  辰消而從坎重復即生之徒十有三重陽  而再益火滅而益膏也不善攝生者莫知  生理役用從離妄念縱慾故自少至老亦  一周十二辰消而自離再姤即死之徒十  有三重陰而再損膏竭而益火也  葉夢得曰十有三四支九竅是也老氏蓋  嘗以有身爲大患矣而昩者不察累於有  身之患皆無能外此十有三物之間使能  知其非我有則超然乃立乎形骸之外豈  出入之所得名然而沉迷轉徒自壯至老  日化而至於死非特不知生而且其動而  趨焉者未嘗不之於死地也則亦以是十  有三物而已  黄茂材曰坎爲水水數六離爲火火數七  凡十有三也  林東曰出於胚胎則爲生體魄入地則爲  死雖有生死而九竅四支生死俱焉一身  之中上七竅而下二竅兩手兩足故謂十  有三也然動之死地亦十有三蓋以自戕  自賊動與惡會而自趨死地亦十有三  本來子邵若愚曰老子以十分爲率而言  之生之徒十分中有三分死之徒十分中  有三分又有民之縁求養生動之死地亦
Interpretation

Li Wenhe of Mount San'e (a sacred Daoist mountain) explains: The Kan trigram (one of the Eight Trigrams/Bagua, symbolizing water) corresponds to the midnight direction and represents the kidneys in the human body, which should remain full rather than depleted—this is the gate of life where primordial Yang (innate vital energy) returns. The Li trigram (symbolizing fire) corresponds to the noon direction and represents the heart in the human body, which should remain tranquil rather than agitated—this is the gate of death where Yin energy erodes Yang energy. Thus, practitioners who regulate Kan-water can attain longevity, while those driven by Li-fire will decline and perish.

Those who understand life cultivation know that the essence (Jing) and vital energy (Qi) nourish the body through the Kan trigram (kidneys), while distracting thoughts deplete the spirit (Shen) through the Li trigram (heart). From youth to old age, the human body undergoes the cyclical consumption of twelve time periods. If one emphasizes nurturing the Kan trigram, they gain vitality—this "three-tenths" of vitality is like adding fuel to a fire. Those unskilled in life cultivation fail to grasp this principle, indulging desires and being driven by Li-fire. Though they too experience the twelve time cycles, they move toward death through Li trigram depletion—this "three-tenths" path to demise resembles an oil-deprived lamp burning out.

Ye Mengde interprets "ten and three" as referring to the four limbs and nine orifices. Laozi once said the physical body is the root of suffering—fools fail to realize this, as all bodily afflictions stem from these thirteen parts. Recognizing the body as not truly one's own allows transcendence beyond physical constraints. Yet worldly people indulge desires, progressing from prime years to old age toward death. Not only do they misunderstand life's truth, their daily actions actively court destruction—all due to these thirteen bodily features.

Huang Maicai explains through trigram numerology: Kan belongs to water (number six); Li belongs to fire (number seven), totaling thirteen. Lin Dong adds that at birth, humans form life through four limbs and nine orifices, which persist as thirteen features even after burial. The body's upper seven orifices, lower two orifices, and four limbs make thirteen parts. Yet self-harm and destructive behaviors also manifest in thirteen ways—all resulting from misconduct that invites death.

Shao Ruoyu synthesizes Laozi's view: Taking ten as the whole, three-tenths represent the path of life, three-tenths the path of death, while common people ironically step into fatal terrain through excessive pursuit of longevity.

 十分中有三分縁生之徒心著有死之徒  心著無民之生心著境三者心有所著皆  居生死之地 夫何故以其生生之厚  御註曰不知身之爲大患  潁濱蘇轍曰有生則有死故生之徒則死  之徒也人之所頼於生者厚則死之道常  十九 蓋聞善攝生者陸行不遇兕虎入軍不被甲 兵兕無所投其角虎無所措其爪兵無所容 其刃夫何故以其無死地  碧虚子陳景元曰諸惡害其有情而不損  其無心  潁濱蘇轍曰至人常在不生不死中生地  且無安有死地哉  達眞子曰凡言攝者皆非己所有也能齊  死生則以生爲假攝而已  陳象古曰外境之來於我何有    道生之章第五十一 道生之德畜之物形之勢成之是以萬物莫 不尊道而貴德道之尊德之貴莫之爵而常 自然  碧虚子陳景元曰道者虚無之體德者自  然之用道體虚無蓮動而生物物從道受  氣故曰生之德用自然包含而畜物物自  德養形故曰畜之凡動植之類皆本道而  生因德而養物質方具故形之物既形矣  則隨四時之勢而成之道降純精而生物  之性德含和氣而養物之形道可以爲父  德可以爲母由此而言萬物無有不尊仰  於道而貴重於德也爵者錫命也世之所  以尊貴者皆因王者之爵命萬物咸被道  德生成之功而尊貴若父母者是道德非
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the path of life and death and the nature of Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue/Power).

Regarding life and death, the text states: If people become overly attached to life ("excessive pursuit of life"), they will instead become trapped in the cycle of birth and death. There are three types of attachments that bind people to this cycle: attachment to "being" (existence), attachment to "non-being" (emptiness), and attachment to external circumstances. Those who are truly skilled at nurturing life ("adepts at preserving life") are like travelers on land who never encounter rhinos or tigers, or warriors who enter battlefields yet remain unharmed by weapons—because they transcend the duality of life and death and no longer conceive of a "realm of death."

Commentators offer further insights: Chen Jingyuan explains that those who have truly attained the Dao ("perfected beings") rise above life and death; Su Zhe states that perfected beings dwell eternally in a state beyond birth and death; Da Zhenzi points out that "preserving life" means not clinging to life as personal property but seeing through the illusory nature of life and death.

Chapter 51, "The Dao Gives Life," elucidates the relationship between Dao and De: Dao is the formless origin, while De is its natural function. Through formless movement, Dao generates all things, while De naturally nurtures them. Once things take form, they grow and transform with the changing seasons. Chen Jingyuan explains that Dao is like a father, endowing all things with their intrinsic nature, while De is like a mother, nourishing their physical forms. The reason all things honor Dao and value De is not due to any external decree, but because it is their natural inclination. Dao and De are like the parents of all things—they require no titles or ranks to be revered, for their reverence arises spontaneously.

(Note: The term "rhino" (兕) refers to a mythical beast resembling a rhinoceros; "preserving life" (摄生) means cultivating longevity; "perfected beings" (至人) refers to those who have realized the Dao.)

 假於爵命而常自然有所攝伏也  穎濱蘇轍曰道者萬物之母故生萬物者  道也及其運而爲德牧養群衆而不辭故  畜萬物者德也然而道德則不能以自形  因物而後形見物則不能自成遠近相取  剛柔相交積而爲勢而後興亡治亂之變  成矣  王雱曰德者道之分物者德之器勢者物  之理道尊而德卑德貴而物賤尊者如君  父貴者如金玉命於天則爲天子命於天  子則爲諸侯有所受命則出命者能賤之  矣惟道在萬物之先而制其命敦能爵之  故常自然也  清源子劉驥曰萬物之尊道而貴德也迎  之不見其首隨之不見其後不可得而尊  故不可得而卑不可得而貴故不可得而  賤所以莫之爵而常自然也  黄茂材曰道有常尊不待物而尊德有常  貴不因物而貴非如人爵者也人爵尊貴  出於使然道德尊貴自然而已 故道生之畜之長之育之成之熟之養之覆 之生而不有爲而不恃長而不宰是謂玄德  御註曰别而言則有道德勢物之異合而  言則皆出于道道者萬物之奥也萬物化  作而道與之生萬物斂藏而道與之成出  乎震成乎艮養乎坤覆乎乾剛柔相摩八  卦相盪若有機緘不能自已道實冒之  碧虚子陳景元曰此八者皆大道之元功  肖翹蝡動之物得不尊之貴之乎道之生  乎萬物若顯其有則收其仁矣養乎萬物
Interpretation

The Dao (cosmic origin) is the mother of all things, for it is the Dao that creates all beings. When the Dao manifests through De (its concrete operation), it nourishes all things without ever declining responsibility—thus it is De that nurtures creation. Yet the Dao and De themselves have no concrete form; they must reveal themselves through all beings. Nor can things generate themselves—they require distant and near elements to resonate, hardness and softness to intermingle, gradually accumulating shi (the inherent momentum of development) before the transformations of prosperity and decline, order and chaos can emerge.

De is the concrete expression of the Dao, all things are the vessels of De, and shi is the pattern of all things. The Dao stands supreme, De comes next, and all beings rank lowest—just as rulers stand above ministers, or gold and jade surpass common goods. The Son of Heaven receives his mandate from Heaven, feudal lords receive theirs from the Son of Heaven; in all cases of receiving commands, the issuer determines status. Only the Dao predetermines the fate of all things before their existence—who could possibly confer nobility upon it? Thus the Dao eternally abides in its natural state.

All things revere the Dao and treasure De, yet looking forward one cannot see its beginning, and following it one finds no end. Precisely because it cannot be deliberately revered, it cannot be debased; because it cannot be artificially exalted, it cannot be belittled. Therefore it needs no noble titles, forever maintaining its natural essence.

The Dao's supremacy exists independent of external things; De's value neither increases nor decreases because of externals—unlike worldly nobility requiring bestowal. Human honor is artificially constructed, while the honor of Dao-De is naturally so.

Thus the Dao generates all beings, nurtures them, makes them grow, cultivates them, perfects them, matures them, protects them, and shelters them. It gives birth without possessing, acts without claiming credit, guides without dominating—this is the most profound De.

Viewed separately, there are distinctions between Dao, De, shi, and things; spoken of together, all stem from the Dao. The Dao is the essential mystery within all things: when beings sprout, the Dao dwells with them; when they return to storage, the Dao remains with them. Beginning with the Zhen trigram (symbolizing stirring) and concluding with the Gen trigram (symbolizing completion), nourished by the Kun trigram (symbolizing earth) and covered by the Qian trigram (symbolizing heaven), hardness and softness mutually stimulate as the eight trigrams shift positions. Though appearing mechanically constrained, in truth the Dao governs all.

These eight functions (generating, nurturing, growing, cultivating, perfecting, maturing, protecting, sheltering) are all fundamental operations of the Dao—even tiny crawling creatures understand to honor it. Were the Dao to deliberately display its benevolence while transforming all things, it would instead lose true benevolence.

 若恃其爲則居其功矣長育群村成熟庶  品養覆動植若矜其宰則處其長矣有是  而退藏於密可謂陰德深矣遠矣  臨川王安石曰此三者皆出於無我故謂  之元德  黄茂材曰道之與德相爲用也始言其道  之大終言其德之元元者妙也非妙不足  以繼其道
Interpretation

When a person takes pride in their accomplishments and becomes arrogant, they lose true De (Virtue/Power). Heaven and earth naturally give birth to all things, nourishing plants and trees, allowing all creatures to mature and multiply. If those who govern these processes (referring to rulers or cultivators) become complacent because of this, they violate the great Dao.

Those who possess genuine De conceal their actions, never displaying them before others—this constitutes the most profound "hidden virtue" (accumulated merit in secret). Wang Anshi of Linchuan (Northern Song statesman) commented: These three states of being (non-claiming of merit, non-boasting, and withdrawing into concealment) all stem from a state of "selflessness," hence they are called "primordial De" (the most fundamental virtue).

Huang Maocai (Song Dynasty scholar) explained: Dao and De complement each other. The beginning speaks of Dao's vast boundlessness, while the conclusion speaks of De's mysterious subtlety. "Primordial" here means mysterious—without this mystery, one cannot inherit the spirit of the great Dao.

This commentary reveals the profound meaning behind the Daode Jing passage: "It gives birth but does not possess, acts but does not claim." True virtue lies in selflessness, just as heaven and earth nurture all things without claiming merit. Practitioners should emulate this spirit—after achieving their work, they should withdraw and attribute all merit to the Dao itself.

道德眞經集註卷之十二

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0095); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 11 Vol. 13 →