中文 · EN

《道德真經集註(二)》Vol. 13

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 13 / 18 9,740 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經集註(二)》 Vol. 13 (Dongshen 洞神部, 18 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 19 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經集註(二)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經集註卷之十三     巳八     宋 鶴 林 彭 耜 纂 集    天下有始章第五十二 天下有始以爲天下母既得其母以知其子 既知其子復守其母殁身不殆  御註曰無名天地之始有名萬物之母始  與母皆道也自其氣之始則謂之始自其  生生則謂之母有始則能生生矣道能母  萬物而字之則物者其子也通於道者兼  物物故得其母以知其子多聞則守之以  約多見則守之以卓窮物之理而不累於  物達道之徼而不失其妙則利用出入往  來不窮可以全生可以盡年而無危殆之  患  碧虚子陳景元曰成者子也生者母也子  者一也一爲冲氣乃道之子所謂道生一  也一爲道之子道爲一之母道爲眞精之  體一爲妙物之用既得其道體以知其妙  用體用相須會歸虚極夫人既知其妙物  之用而復守其眞精之體體用冥一應感  不窮然後可以無爲而無不爲故能没身  不殆矣  潁濱蘇轍曰聖人體道以周物譬如以母  知子了然無不察也雖其智能周之然而  未嘗以物忘道故終守其母也  臨川王安石曰一陰一陽之謂道而陰陽  之中有冲氣冲氣生於道道者天也萬物  之所自生故爲天下母夫物芸芸各歸其  根歸根曰靜靜曰復命則得以返其本也  故曰復守其母也
Interpretation

This passage comes from Peng Si's Song Dynasty compilation Collected Commentaries on the Dao De Jing, explicating Chapter 52 of the Dao De Jing concerning the Dao as the origin of all things.

The chapter's opening phrase "All under heaven has a beginning" indicates that heaven, earth, and the myriad things all have a starting point—this fundamental source is the Dao (the universal principle). The Dao serves both as the origin (beginning) and the nurturing mother of all creation. Just as a mother gives birth to children, the Dao generates all phenomena in the world (its offspring).

Those who comprehend this truth must understand both the operational patterns of manifested things (the children) and maintain connection with the root Dao (the mother). By doing so, even when physical life ends, one does not truly perish. Several Song Dynasty scholars offered distinct interpretations:

Emperor Huizong (in his Imperial Commentary) viewed the formless Dao as heaven and earth's inception, while its manifest aspect generates all things. The Dao creates everything like a mother naming her children. Those truly attuned to the Dao can grasp complexity through simplicity, perceive essence beyond appearances—neither obsessed with materiality nor straying from the Dao's profundity—thus navigating worldly affairs with ease while remaining free from lifelong worries.

Chen Jingyuan (Master Bixu) explained through substance-function relationships: "The One" (primordial qi) represents the Dao's first concrete manifestation (child), while the Dao itself remains the subtle substance (mother). Understanding the Dao's substance reveals its function; maintaining the substance enables flexible application, achieving the state of non-action (wuwei) that accomplishes all things.

Su Zhe (Yingbin) proposed that sages use the Dao to comprehend phenomena as thoroughly as a mother knows her children. Though wisdom may survey all things, one must never forget the root Dao.

Wang Anshi (Linchuan) employed yin-yang theory: the harmonizing qi emerging from yin-yang transformations originates from the Dao. All things ultimately return to their source (returning to the root) and revert to quiescent original nature (recovering destiny), which constitutes the meaning of "returning to guard the mother."

These interpretations collectively emphasize grasping the fundamental Dao-principle, asserting that only by returning to the origin and upholding the Great Dao can one attain true wisdom and enduring existence.

 達眞子曰萬物以天地爲始天地以道爲  始是天下之始莫不始於道也唯天下莫  不始之於道所以爲天下之母也凡萬物  之所資生者母也凡萬物之所資息者子  也以道爲母則天下資生於道者皆子也  是以既得其母以知其子矣以其有復歸  於無以其動復歸於靜則有之者無終窮  動之者無危殆故曰既知其子復守其母  没身不殆言體道之反本者能然也  黄茂村曰天下之生林林如也推其始必  有生之者焉經曰有名萬物之母此其始  生者也故爲母萬物其子也得其母而守  之則是生我者常存而我生者不失矣故  能不殆 塞其兊閉其門終身不勤開其兊濟其事終 身不救  碧虚子陳景元曰免目也緘無厭之目則  諸境自絶矣門口也杜多言之口則衆禍  莫干矣諸境自絶則嗜慾之源塞衆禍莫  干則云爲之路閉如是則恬澹安逸而終  身不勤若乃不守母道者開其愛悦之源  而弗塞則嗜慾之情長矣通其云爲之路  而弗閉則禍患之事濟矣如是則憂苦危  亡而終身不救也  王雱曰免悦也人悦則形開矣故爲免兊  則物入之矣門者精神之所出也外見諸  理形開以受之而復出精神與之爲構則  擾擾萬緒自此始矣故當塞免閉門常守  其母也塞兊閉門以外應物則酬酢萬變  而用常有餘免開物入而復費精神用以
Interpretation

Da Zhenzi said that all things originate from Heaven and Earth, yet Heaven and Earth themselves take the Dao as their root. Thus, the genesis of all phenomena in the world invariably stems from the Dao. Precisely because the myriad things under heaven all emerge from the Dao, the Dao is called the mother of all creation. The source from which all beings grow is the "mother," while that which relies on this source to develop is the "child." If we liken the Dao to a mother, then all things in the world that depend on the Dao for their existence are its children.

Once one recognizes the "mother" as the fundamental origin, one can understand the "children" it gives birth to. Returning from form to formlessness, from movement to stillness—those with physical form will never be exhausted, and those in motion will never encounter danger. Therefore, understanding the principle of the "child" while returning to safeguard the root of the "mother" ensures one will remain free from peril throughout life. This refers to those who realize the Great Dao and return to the origin.

Huang Maocun said, the ceaseless generation of all things under heaven must have an original creator. The Daode Jing states "the named is the mother of all things," referring precisely to this primordial creator—hence called the "mother," while all things are its "children." By grasping and preserving this root, the source that created us will endure eternally, and what we create will not be lost, thereby avoiding danger.

"Block the openings (referring to the senses), shut the gates (referring to the doors of desire), and to the end of life there will be no toil. Open the openings and multiply affairs, and to the end of life there will be no salvation." Master Bi Xu (Chen Jingyuan) explained: "Openings" mean the eyes—when covetous eyes are closed, external temptations are naturally cut off; "gates" mean the mouth—when the talkative mouth is stopped, all calamities cannot intrude. Severing external connections blocks the source of desire; preventing calamities closes the path of reckless action. Thus one attains serene tranquility and avoids lifelong toil. Conversely, those who do not guard the fundamental Dao open the source of craving without blocking it, allowing desires to proliferate; they unbar the path of reckless action without closing it, inviting calamity. Thus they sink into sorrow and peril with no hope of salvation.

Wang Pang explained: "Openings" refer to pleasure—when humans experience pleasure, their physical form becomes unrestrained. Thus when "openings" are unblocked, external things invade. "Gates" are where the spirit enters and exits, manifesting as various actions. When the physical form opens to receive external things while expending spirit to interact with them, complex entanglements begin. Therefore, one should block the "openings" and shut the "gates," constantly preserving the root. By closing the sensory gates to respond to external things, one handles infinite changes with ease. But opening the senses to let external things invade while exhausting the spirit to cope leads to inevitable peril.

 濟事則以内徇外逐物往矣一溺此流誰  能救之哉  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰兊澤也在人爲  口與舌禍福樞機不可妄發門謂語言視  聽情念也吉凶之應出入於此故閉之也  有道者掩扉塞免終身不勞  清源子劉驥曰經所謂閉塞命門保玉都  是也内景不出外景不入其氣自定其神  自眞其神既眞則性入自然與道爲一以  挈天地以襲氣母而入於不死不生故終  身不勤若開其喜悦之源而弗塞濟其愛  慾之事而弗閉則物誘於外而情動於中  氣亡液漏精散神去所以役役不見其成  功故終身不救 見小曰明守柔曰强用其光復歸其明無遺 身殃是謂襲常  御註曰小者道之妙見道之妙者自知而  已故無不明柔者道之本守道之本者自  勝而已故無不强明者光之體光者明之  用聖人之應世從體超用則輝散爲光攝  用歸體則智徹爲明顯諸仁藏諸用如彼  日月萬物皆照而明未嘗虧所以神明其  德是也物之化無常也惟復命者遺物離  人復歸於明而不與物俱化故體常而無  患  碧虚子陳景元曰此謂防於未萌治於未  亂守柔弱則物不能加可謂强矣見微小  則事不能昏可謂明矣光者智照也智主  外故外照而常動動則爲物之用明者慧  解也慧主内故内景而常靜靜則爲己之
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how practitioners can maintain inner purity by controlling sensory desires, ultimately achieving unity with the Dao (the Way).

When one becomes engrossed in external matters, it is like being swept away by a current, making self-rescue difficult. Master Cao Daochong explains that the mouth and tongue are akin to the Dui trigram (one of the Eight Trigrams, symbolizing the marsh), serving as the pivot of fortune and misfortune—thus, one must not speak carelessly. The eyes seeing, the ears hearing, and the mind dwelling on sensory experiences all trigger shifts between auspicious and inauspicious outcomes. Therefore, practitioners must learn to close these sensory gateways. Those who truly attain the Dao seal these sensory portals, remaining unburdened by external distractions for life.

Liu Ji (Daoist name Qingyuanzi) elaborates further, stating that the Daode Jing’s teaching to "block the mingmen (a vital acupoint) and preserve the Jade Capital (referring to the head)" conveys this very principle. When inner visions do not leak outward and external impressions do not invade inward, one’s primordial Qi (vital energy) naturally stabilizes, and the Shen (spirit) remains pure. A pure spirit allows one to return to their innate nature, uniting with the Dao, comprehending the laws of heaven and earth, and aligning with the source of primordial Qi—thus reaching the state beyond birth and death. Conversely, if one indulges in joy without restraining desires, they will be lured by external temptations, their inner mind becoming agitated. This leads to the dissipation of Qi, leakage of Jing (essence), and scattering of the Shen. Such a life of restless striving yields little accomplishment.

The scripture continues: To perceive subtle omens is called wisdom; to maintain a gentle and yielding posture is called strength. By wielding the light of wisdom, one ultimately returns to the original clarity, leaving no calamity for oneself—this is the way of following the constant Dao. Emperor Huizong of Song’s commentary explains that the subtle embodies the profundity of the Dao, and understanding this principle naturally grants insight into all things. Gentleness is the root of the Dao, and preserving this root constitutes true strength. The light of wisdom is used to engage with the external world, while original clarity is the illumination of inner realization. When sages engage with the world, they both extend wisdom to respond to phenomena and withdraw it to return to their essence—just as the sun and moon illuminate all things without diminishing their radiance.

Chen Jingyuan (Daoist name Bixuzi) adds that one must prevent calamity before it arises and govern disorder before it manifests. Maintaining a gentle and yielding posture ensures that external things cannot harm you—this is true strength. Perceiving subtle omens prevents confusion by appearances—this is true wisdom. The light of wisdom governs the external, serving to engage with phenomena, while enlightened understanding governs the internal, serving cultivation. Only by returning to original clarity can one transcend impermanent changes, preserving the constant nature and remaining free from calamity.

 體夫智照出則應事反則歸理是以用歸  體故曰用其光復歸其明不役智外照而  守慧内景復嗜慾之未萌而歸子母之元  故無殃是謂密用常道者也  潁濱蘇轍曰夫耳之能聽目之能視鼻之  能嗅口之能嘗身之能觸心之能思皆所  謂光也蓋光與物接物有去而明無損是  以應萬變而不窮殃不及於其身故其常  性湛然相襲而不絶矣  臨川王安石曰見小曰明者微而見之則  可謂之明見於大則不足以謂之明故曰  見小曰明至柔馳騁天下之至堅也故曰  守柔曰强用光復歸其明者蓋光者明之  用明者光之體言强則知柔之爲體言明  則知光之爲用唯其能用其光復歸其根  則終身不至於有咎而能密合常乆之道  故曰無遺身殃是謂襲常  陳象古曰常人忽於小而重於大干雲之  木起於葱青千里之塗始於足下此見小  之義也預識先知非明而何揉曲木者不  累日銷金石者不累月此柔弱勝剛强之  義也光者照於外者也明者内自照者也  用其光則知其子是也歸其明則復其母  是也  黄茂材曰漢世尚黄老有老父者獨深得  其道蓋公諸人皆不及也惜乎史失其名  龔勝之死有老父來弔甚哀既而曰嗟乎  薫以香自燒膏以明自銷龔生竟夭天年  非吾徒也遂趨而出莫知其誰    使我介然章第五十三
Interpretation

This passage compiles annotations on the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue) from multiple scholars, which I'll explain section by section:

Su Zhe (Yingbin) posits that human sensory faculties—hearing, sight, smell, taste, touch, and thought—all originate from inner "light." When this luminous awareness interacts with external phenomena, the objects may transform or fade, but the intrinsic clarity remains undiminished. Thus one can respond to myriad changes without harm, preserving the original nature's purity across generations without interruption.

Wang Anshi (Linchuan) interprets "perceiving subtlety is called true vision" as recognizing that genuine understanding requires noticing minute details, while superficial observation doesn't constitute real knowledge. The softest things penetrate the hardest substances, hence "maintaining softness is called true strength." "Using radiance to return to illumination" indicates that outward brilliance (light) manifests from inner awareness (ming), with illumination being the source of radiance. True wisdom understands strength must be rooted in softness, just as light emanates from fundamental awareness. Only by skillfully employing external expressions while returning to the source can one avoid lifelong errors and align with the eternal Dao.

Chen Xianggu observes that ordinary people often neglect small matters while overvaluing grand ones. Towering trees grow from tender sprouts, thousand-mile journeys begin with single steps—this embodies the meaning of "seeing the small." True wisdom lies in foreseeing future developments. Bending wood requires no constant force; melting metal needs no month-long effort—demonstrating how softness overcomes hardness. Light projects outward, while illumination turns inward. When applying external manifestations, understand their origins (knowing the offspring); when returning to inner awareness, trace back to their source (recovering the mother).

Huang Maocai references the Han Dynasty's reverence for Huang-Lao teachings, mentioning an unnamed elder who grasped their essence more profoundly than even renowned masters like Master Gai—a figure regrettably unrecorded in histories. When Gong Sheng passed away, an elder came to mourn, sighing: "Incense burns itself through fragrance, lamp oil consumes itself by giving light. Master Gong didn't exhaust his natural lifespan—he wasn't truly of our Way." Having spoken, the elder departed, leaving none knowing his identity.

The concluding marker "Chapter Fifty-Three: 'Were I Granted Steadfastness'" references the original Daode Jing section these commentaries address. This chapter primarily discusses maintaining independent, transcendent awareness without following worldly currents.

使我介然有知行於大道唯施是畏  碧虚子陳景元曰畏其不合於古道也  潁濱蘇轍曰體道者無知無行無所施設  而物自化今介然有知而行於大道則有  所施設建立非其自然有足畏者矣  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰介然謂凝寂不  動長守大道無爲而已凡有所爲者雖曰  善動至人之所畏也  達眞子曰介者纖介之謂小有知於大道  猶唯施是畏况大有知者乎  清源子劉驥曰知之淺矣使我介然有知  已非道之妙若有所施爲則尤非自然  黄茂材曰夫道不可以智知不可以力行  無所施設作爲今有介然有知是以智知  之行於大道是以力行之唯施是畏是有  所設施作爲不亦可畏乎  林東曰使我介毅然有知而行於大道唯  於施爲間而無不致其畏謹則不至於好  邪徑而求捷速不至於捨本而逐末如下  文所謂也 大道甚夷而民好徑  御註曰道夷而徑速欲速以邀近功而去  道也遠矣  碧虚子陳景元曰是以崎嶇迷惑不達  涑水司馬光曰道本簡易由人之好鑿故  失道  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰修身之道自然  綿綿實爲至理而學速求必得故方術之  家紛然並作  清源子劉驥曰好由捷徑以失眞道所謂  甚易知甚易行而天下莫能知莫能行也 朝甚除田甚蕪倉甚虚服文采帶利劍厭飲
Interpretation

This scripture discusses how Dao practitioners should approach the relationship between "knowing" and "doing." Multiple Daoist masters offer perspectives: practitioners should maintain inner clarity, follow the natural Dao (the Way), and avoid deliberate action.

Chen Jingyuan warns that practitioners should fear nothing more than actions misaligned with ancient Dao. Su Zhe suggests that those who truly comprehend the Dao neither deliberately pursue knowledge nor action, but allow all things to transform naturally. Forced pursuit of knowledge or action deviates from the natural Dao—a pitfall to be wary of.

Cao Daochong explains that "firm resolve" (jieran) refers to an unwavering, tranquil mind that abides long in the Wuwei (non-action) state of the Dao. Even well-intentioned deliberate action is feared by those who have attained the Dao. Dazhenzi emphasizes that even minimal understanding of the Dao demands vigilance against forced action—how much more so for those who presume deep knowledge.

Liu Ji and Huang Maocai both assert that the Dao cannot be grasped through intellect or achieved through contrived effort. Lin Dong adds that practitioners should approach all actions with reverence and caution, ensuring they neither stray onto wrong paths nor neglect fundamentals for superficial gains.

The latter passage—"The Dao is very smooth, yet people prefer bypaths"—observes that while the Dao is naturally straightforward, people favor shortcuts. The Imperial Commentary explains that though the Dao is level, shortcuts appear faster, yet chasing speed only distances one from it. Sima Guang notes the Dao is inherently simple, but people lose their way by seeking novelty. Cao Daochong points out that self-cultivation should unfold naturally over time, yet impatience for quick results fuels the rise of expedient techniques. Liu Ji concludes that craving shortcuts leads to losing the true Dao—which is why, though the Dao seems easy to know and practice, few in the world truly grasp or embody it.

食資財有餘是謂盜誇非道也哉  碧虚子陳景元曰也哉傷嘆之詞也唯施  是畏其在兹乎  涑水司馬光曰失道之國好察近而遺遠  逐末而忘本故視其朝若修治而察其民  實貧困又取非其有謂之盜德薄位尊智  小謀大危亡將及曾不自知乃更矜誇以  爲得意服美不稱積實無厭故曰盜誇所  以有此誇者豈非本欲行道而更鑿以致  失哉  臨川王安石曰此逐末也猶人趨邪徑而  棄大道也  達眞子曰失大道而由小徑者以事物比  之則如朝甚除而日用田甚藥而荒塞倉  甚虚其畜積而反服文采帶利劍厭飲食  以爲資財有餘是不務修其本而反矜施  其末也    善建不拔章第五十四 善建者不拔善抱者不脱子孫以祭祀不輟  御註曰建中以該上下故不拔抱一以應  萬變故不脱建中而不外乎道抱一而不  離於精若是者豈特行一國與當年蓋將  及天下與來世其傳也遠矣  涑水司馬光曰不拔者深根固蒂不可動  摇不脱者民心懐服不可傾奪不輟者享  祚乆長  潁濱蘇轍曰世豈有建而不拔抱而不脱  者乎惟聖人知性之眞審物之妄捐物而  修身其德充積實無所立而其建有不可  拔者實無所執而其抱有不可脱者故至  其子孫猶以祭祀不輟也  臨川王安石曰善建者德建也能德建則
Interpretation

Here we see that those who acquire wealth through improper means are like robbers flaunting their riches—this is certainly not the true Dao (the Way).

Chen Jingyuan (Master Bixu) explains that the phrase "ye zai" expresses a lament of sorrow. Such behavior is truly distressing.

Sima Guang (Master Sushui) analyzes that nations straying from the Dao often focus on immediate gains while neglecting long-term development, pursuing trivialities while forgetting fundamentals. Though the court may appear well-governed on the surface, the people actually live in poverty. To seize what does not rightfully belong to one is banditry—to occupy high positions with shallow De (Virtue), to make grand plans with little wisdom. Such people remain unaware of impending danger, instead growing arrogant and self-satisfied. Wearing fine robes beyond their station, greedily amassing wealth—this is what is meant by "robber's boasting." Does such ostentation not stem from having intended to follow the right path but gone astray?

Wang Anshi (Master Linchuan) observes that this is like abandoning the root for the branches, forsaking the main road for byways.

Master Dazhen further explains that those who turn from the great Dao to follow lesser paths can be compared to a court that appears orderly while daily necessities run short, fields lying fallow yet adorned for show, empty storehouses yet officials clad in finery with swords at their waists, feasting extravagantly while imagining themselves wealthy. This is neglecting fundamental cultivation while flaunting superficial displays.

Chapter 54 then discusses the principle of "what is well planted cannot be uprooted":

What is truly well established cannot be uprooted; what is truly well embraced cannot slip away—thus may descendants continue sacrifices without end.

The Emperor's commentary states: Establish the Middle Way to govern high and low, therefore it cannot be uprooted; embrace pure unity to respond to myriad changes, therefore it cannot slip away. Establishing centrality without deviating from the Dao, embracing unity without abandoning essence—such influence extends beyond one's own country and era to shape the world and future generations, enduring through time.

Sima Guang explains: "Cannot be uprooted" is like deep roots that cannot be shaken; "cannot slip away" is like the people's hearts that cannot be taken; "without end" means blessings flow continuously.

Su Zhe (Master Yingbin) remarks: In this world, what can be established never to fall, or held never to be lost? Only the sage understands the truth of inner nature and sees through the illusion of external things, relinquishing externals to cultivate the self. His accumulated De becomes so substantial that what seems unestablished cannot be shaken; what seems unclung-to cannot slip away. Thus through his descendants, sacrificial offerings never cease.

Wang Anshi says: What is well established is De. One who can establish De will find what is established cannot be moved.

 不拔矣善抱者抱一也抱一而不離則不  脱矣能建德抱一則德之盛故盛德百世  祭祀祭祀者見於愈遠而不忘故曰子孫  祭祀不輟  陸佃曰善閉無關鍵而不可開故曰善建  者不拔善結無繩約而不可解故曰善抱  者不脱  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰深根固蒂是謂  善建抱本守眞是謂不脱先利於身次及  於物又以正直清廉仁愛之道遺於後世  故慶及子孫積德繼美祭祀不絶矣  葉夢得曰出而有立故謂之建入而有守  故謂之抱出者有本故不可拔入者有常  故不可脱夫如是則立者雖遠而愈長守  者雖近而愈乆譬之於己非特及其身而  已垂之子孫祭祀不輟其事我者無時而  可亡也  黄茂材曰夫道獨立而不改以是而建則  爲善建故不拔載營魄抱一能無離乎以  是而抱則爲善抱故不脱不拔不脱非特  可持當年雖傳後世可也故曰子孫以祭  祀不輟 修之身其德乃眞修之家其德乃餘修之鄉 其德乃長修之國其德乃豐修之天下其德 乃普  御註曰修之身其德乃眞所謂道之眞以  治身也修之家其德乃餘修之鄉其德乃  長所謂其緒餘以治人也修之國其德乃  豐修之天下其德乃普所謂其土苴以治  天下國家也其修彌遠其德彌廣在我者  皆其眞也在彼者特其末耳故餘而後長  豐而後普於道爲外
Interpretation

Those skilled in establishing the foundation of Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue) create what cannot be easily uprooted. Those adept at preserving the Dao hold fast to its essence ("embracing the One" refers to maintaining the fundamental nature of the Great Dao), thus never losing its root. Those who can both establish and preserve the Dao will possess profound virtue. Because their virtue runs deep, they will be venerated for a hundred generations. The significance of such veneration lies in how virtue, the longer it endures, the more it is remembered—hence the sacrifices of descendants will never cease.

Lu Dian explains: Those skilled at closing need no bolt yet cannot be opened—this is the meaning of "what is well established cannot be uprooted." Those skilled at tying knots need no cord yet cannot be undone—this is the meaning of "what is firmly embraced cannot slip away."

Cao Daochong (Daoist name Master Renjing) observes: Like a deeply rooted tree, unshakable in its foundation—this is "skilled establishment." Holding fast to one's innate nature, preserving purity—this is "not slipping away." First cultivate oneself, then extend to others, transmitting virtues of integrity, purity, and benevolence to future generations. Thus, blessings reach descendants, accumulated virtue passes down through the ages, and sacrificial rites remain unbroken.

Ye Mengde states: Establishing achievements outwardly is called "building," while preserving one's nature inwardly is called "embracing." If what is built has a foundation, it will not be shaken; if what is embraced has constancy, it will not be lost. Achievements built this way will endure even over great distances, while virtues preserved this way will persist even in close quarters. This benefits not only oneself but also one's descendants—sacrifices will never cease, and those who follow will never vanish.

Huang Maocai points out: The Great Dao stands alone, eternal and unchanging—what is built upon it is "skillfully established," and thus cannot be shaken. "Carrying the soul and embracing the One" (uniting spirit and form to hold fast to the Dao) ensures no separation—this is "skillfully embraced," and thus cannot be lost. Virtue that is neither shaken nor lost endures not only in one's own time but also for generations to come—hence the sacrifices of descendants will never cease.

Cultivate the self, and virtue becomes pure.

Cultivate the family, and virtue becomes abundant.

Cultivate the community, and virtue becomes enduring.

Cultivate the nation, and virtue becomes flourishing.

Cultivate the world, and virtue becomes universal.

Emperor Huizong of Song (Imperial Commentary) explains: Cultivating the self to make virtue pure means refining oneself with the true essence of the Dao. Cultivating the family to make virtue abundant, and the community to make it enduring, means teaching others with the Dao's remaining traces. Cultivating the nation to make virtue flourishing, and the world to make it universal, means governing states and empires with the coarser aspects of the Dao. The broader the scope of cultivation, the greater the influence of virtue. The key lies in cultivating the self with purity—all else is secondary. Thus, abundance precedes endurance, flourishing precedes universality—all these are outward manifestations of the Dao.

 碧虚子陳景元曰此五者近修諸身而遠  及天下也夫修道於身者心閑性淡愛氣  養神少私寡欲益壽延年諸僞咸盡乃爲  眞人矣  涑水司馬光曰皆循本以治末由近以及  遠  王雱曰因修身之法而推之以及其外餘  而後長長而後豐豐而後普  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰以道修身則神  眞行正身正而天下化况以之治家信有  餘矣施於鄉而一鄉化矣施於一國其國  盛矣始自一身遍及四海  達眞子曰眞則不僞餘則不欠踰於衆則  曰長足於衆則曰豐遍於衆則曰普凡得  於道之謂德自一身以至一家自一家以  至一鄉自一鄉以至一國自一國以至天  下以道爲治則無乎不善矣 故以身觀身以家觀家以鄉觀鄉以國觀國 以天下觀天下吾何以知天下之然哉以此  碧虚子陳景元曰觀者照察也故以先聖  治身之道反觀吾身心若吾身心能體於  道則其德乃眞矣老氏言我奚以知天下  之民嚮道者昌背道者亡之然哉者設問  之辭也答曰我以此上之所陳五事反觀  照察所以知之經曰不出户知天下易曰  觀我生觀民也其是之謂乎  潁濱蘇轍曰天地外者世俗所不見矣然  其理可推而知也修身之至以身觀身以  家觀家以鄉觀鄉以國觀國皆吾之所及  知也然安知聖人以天下觀天下不若吾
Interpretation

Master Bi Xu (Chen Jingyuan) states that these five aspects (self-cultivation, family regulation, village governance, state administration, and pacification of the world) begin with personal refinement and ultimately influence all under heaven. Practitioners of the Dao must maintain a tranquil mind and serene disposition, nourish their Jing (essence), Qi (vital energy), and Shen (spirit), and reduce selfish desires. Only thus can they prolong life, eliminate all falsehood, and become true attainers of the Dao.

Sima Guang (Master Sushui) observes that these principles address branches by returning to the root, extending from the near to the distant.

Wang Pang explains that the method of self-cultivation progressively expands outward: first creating abundance before growth becomes possible, growth enabling flourishing, and flourishing making universal application attainable.

Master Cao Daochong (Dao Zhen Ren Jing) points out that cultivating oneself with the Dao results in pure spirit and upright conduct. When one's person is rectified, it transforms the world, and applying this to family governance proves more than sufficient. Extended to villages, it educates communities; applied to states, it brings prosperity; ultimately spreading from the individual to the four seas.

Master Da Zhen declares: What is genuine contains no falsehood, what is abundant lacks nothing. Surpassing the multitude is called growth, satisfying the multitude is called flourishing, and reaching the multitude is called universality. All attainments of the Dao are called De (virtue). From person to family, family to village, village to state, and state to the world - governing with the Dao leaves nothing unperfected.

Therefore, we observe the person through the person, the family through the family, the village through the village, the state through the state, and the world through the world. How do I know the world is thus? Precisely through this method.

Master Bi Xu explains that "observation" means illuminating examination. Using the ancient sages' way of self-cultivation to reflect upon oneself, if body and mind embody the Dao, one's virtue becomes genuine. Laozi asks: How do I know that the world prospers by following the Dao and declines by opposing it? This is a rhetorical question. The answer: Through reflective observation of these five aspects we may know. As the Yijing states: "Observing one's own life reveals understanding of the people" - this expresses the same principle.

Su Zhe (Master Yingbin) remarks: What lies beyond heaven and earth remains unseen by ordinary people, yet its principles can be inferred. The supreme method of self-cultivation involves observing the person through the person, the family through the family, the village through the village, and the state through the state - all within our capacity to know. But the sage's "observing the world through the world" perhaps surpasses our ordinary understanding.

 之以身觀身乎豈身可以身觀而天下獨  不可以天下觀乎故曰吾何以知天下之  然哉以此言亦以身知之耳  臨川王安石曰身有身之道故以身觀身  家有家之道故以家觀家以至於鄉國天  下吾何以知天下之然哉以此者蓋以此  道觀之也言以此者此則同於道彼則異  於道同則取之異則去之  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰察身之損益邪  正則知衆人矣察家之逆順盛衰則知他  之家矣自一鄉之小至天下之大小大則  殊其治一也何以知天下之然以用此道  而知矣  陳象古曰見治身之道則知治己之身見  治家之道則知治己之家見治鄉之道則  知治己之鄉見治國之道則知治己之國  見治天下之道則知治己之天下不拔不  脱由此可明矣以此者蓋用此觀身觀家  觀鄉觀國觀天下之道矣  黄茂材曰雖其大小遠近之有不同而其  爲德未始或異故以吾一身而觀衆身以  吾一家而觀衆家以吾一鄉而觀衆鄉以  吾一國而觀衆國以吾一天下而觀衆天  下皆可以知之或問以吾一天下而觀衆  天下何也湯問於夏革曰四海之外奚有  曰猶齊州也朕東行至營人民猶是也問  營之東復猶營也西行至豳人民猶是也  問豳之西復猶豳也朕以是知四海四荒  四極之不異是也以天下觀天下捨夏革  其誰知之
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the principle of comprehending all things under heaven through self-observation. Several Daoist scholars expound the epistemological method of "understanding the greater through the lesser" from different perspectives.

Wang Anshi states: Every individual follows inherent patterns of being, thus one can understand others by observing oneself; every household operates according to its own principles, thus one can understand other families by observing one's own. From individuals to households, villages, states, and ultimately the entire world, the same logic applies. My method for grasping the operating principles of the world employs this "moving from the near to the distant" approach of observation. What aligns with the Dao (the Way) is embraced, what contradicts it is discarded.

Cao Daochong (Daoist name Master Renjing) supplements: By observing the successes, failures, rights and wrongs within oneself, one can perceive the condition of the multitude; by observing the prosperity, decline, favorable and adverse circumstances of one's household, one can comprehend other households. From a small village to the vast world, though the scale differs, the governing principles remain interconnected. The method for understanding world affairs lies precisely in applying this approach.

Chen Xianggu further explains: Understanding the Dao of self-cultivation enables proper self-governance; understanding household management enables proper family stewardship; understanding village administration enables proper community leadership; understanding state governance enables proper national rule; understanding world governance enables proper universal mastery. Thus one grasps the fundamental without deviation. The phrase "by this" refers precisely to this observational method of progressing from near to far, from small to great.

Huang Maocai employs a vivid analogy: Though things differ in size and distance, their inherent principles show no variation. Like when King Tang of Shang asked Xia Ge: "What lies beyond the Four Seas?" Xia Ge replied: "The same as the Central Plains." When King Tang traveled east to Yingyi, he found its people no different from those in the Central Plains; proceeding further east revealed the same pattern. Journeying west to Bin produced identical findings. Thus he realized the essential sameness across all lands. To understand the world through the method of comprehending the world—who besides someone like Xia Ge, skilled in analogical reasoning, could truly grasp this?

These interpretations collectively demonstrate that understanding reality begins with personal experience, extending comprehension of grand patterns through observation of concrete, immediate examples. This "extending from self to others" cognitive approach constitutes an essential Daoist mode of thinking.

 程大昌曰吾何以知天下之然而自指其  要領在此者以眞爲斷也    含德之厚章第五十五 含德之厚比於赤子  御註曰孟子曰大人不失赤子之心  碧虚子陳景元曰含懷也夫至人純粹懷  德深厚情復於性憺泊無欲狀貌兀然比  於赤子也赤子者取其始生其色赤純和  之至也  潁濱蘇轍曰老子之言道德每以嬰兒況  之者皆言其體而已未及其用也今夫嬰  兒泊然無欲其體之者至矣然而物來而  不知應故未可以言用也  臨川王安石曰赤子者天守全而陽不散  故含德之厚比於赤子  陸佃曰知其雄守其雌爲天下谿爲天下  谿常德不離復歸于嬰兒此即所謂含德  之厚比於赤子也  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰含者抱也心不  偷薄其德乃厚赤子謂嬰兒也天純未散  外無所營積和在中復如赤子  葉夢得曰老子既以嬰兒論道矣於此含  德之厚復比之赤子嬰兒其未孩者也所  保者氣而已故道似之赤子則既孩矣而  未有知也故德似之  清源子劉驥曰聖人抱道懷德深厚無思  無爲寂然不動故比於赤子  程大昌曰含德者藴其德於内而不形於  外者也莊子謂絶滅聲律文采而人始含  其聰明削曾史之行鉗楊墨之口而後人  始含其德者蓋釋此也 毒蟲不螫猛獸不據攫鳥不搏
Interpretation

Cheng Dachang stated that the reason he could comprehend the patterns of all things under heaven lies in grasping the fundamental principle of "authenticity."

Chapter 55, titled "The Thickness of Virtue (De)," says: Those with profound virtue are like newborn infants.

Emperor Huizong of Song (in his imperial commentary) quoted Mencius to explain: Those of lofty virtue preserve the pure nature of an infant. Chen Jingyuan (Bixuzi) explained that "to contain" (含) means to embrace. Those who have cultivated themselves to the highest level possess a pure heart and profound virtue, their temperament returning to primal simplicity—detached and desireless, their outward appearance as plain as an infant. "Red infant" (赤子) refers to a newborn baby, so named for its ruddy complexion, symbolizing the most pristine and harmonious state.

Su Zhe (Yingbin) believed that Laozi used the infant as a metaphor for the Dao (the Way) to illustrate its essence rather than its function. The infant, free from desires and demands, perfectly embodies the essence of the Dao, yet it does not yet know how to respond to external things, so it cannot illustrate the Dao's function.

Wang Anshi (Linchuan) pointed out that the red infant naturally preserves its pure Yang-Qi (vital energy) without dissipation, so those with profound virtue can be compared to it. Lu Dian cited another chapter of the Daodejing to explain that knowing the strength of the masculine yet abiding in the softness of the feminine allows one to embrace all things like a stream, maintaining constant virtue and ultimately returning to the purity of an infant.

Cao Daochong (Daoist Master Zhenren Jing) explained: "To contain" means to embrace, with a heart that is neither frivolous nor shallow—only then can virtue be profound. The "red infant" refers to a baby whose innate nature remains pure and undispersed, unseeking of external things, inwardly accumulating harmonious Qi (vital energy).

Ye Mengde analyzed that Laozi used the infant as a metaphor for the Dao, and here he uses the red infant as a metaphor for virtue (De). The infant, not yet grown into a child, retains its primordial Qi (vital energy), thus resembling the Dao; the red infant, though already a child, has not yet developed cognition, thus resembling virtue (De).

Liu Ji (Qingyuanzi) said that the sage embraces the Dao and virtue, profound and desireless, silent and non-acting (Wuwei), thus comparable to the red infant. Cheng Dachang further explained that "containing virtue" means to harbor virtue within the heart without outward display, as Zhuangzi said: "Only by discarding musical tones and ornamentation do people reveal their wisdom; only by eliminating the contrived behavior of Zeng Shen and Shi Qiu, and restraining the debates of Yang Zhu and Mozi, can people truly preserve virtue."

(Continuing with the explanation of the red infant's traits) Poisonous insects will not sting him, fierce beasts will not pounce on him, and birds of prey will not strike him. This metaphor illustrates that those with profound virtue, being pure and non-contentious, naturally avoid harm. Just as the infant, though weak, is protected by the Qi (vital energy) of heaven and earth.

 御註曰含德之厚者憂患不能入邪氣不  能襲故物莫能傷焉莊子曰人能虚己以  游世其孰能害之  碧虚子陳景元曰毒蟲者蜂蠆之類也以  尾端肆毒曰螫猛獸者虎豹之類也以爪  拏按曰據攫鳥者鵰鶚之類也以羽距擊  觸曰搏夫至人神矣嗒然喪偶如赤子之  無心故神全而物莫能傷也  潁濱蘇轍曰道無形體物莫得而見也況  可得而傷之乎人之所以至於有形者由  其有心也故有心而後有形有形而後有  敵敵立而傷之者至矣無心之人物無與  敵者而曷由傷之夫赤子之所以至此者  唯無心也  臨川王安石曰赤子之心非有害物也無  害物則物亦莫能害  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰稚子無心害物  物亦不與爲害  清源子劉驥曰憂患不能入邪氣不能襲  其天守全其神無郤物無自入焉如莊子  所謂醉者之墜車雖骨節與人同而犯害  與人異以其死生驚懽不入於胸中彼全  於酒者猶若是而况全於天者乎  黄茂村曰今夫赤子毒蟲不螫猛獸不據  攫鳥不摶者精不離而和不散爾人能養  其精和之至則亦赤子如也昔有梁鴦者  能養野禽獸委食於園庭之内雖虎狼鵰  鶚之類無不柔馴者雌雄在前孳尾成群  異類雜居不相摶噬問其術則曰吾心無  逆順鳥獸視吾猶其儕也夫心無逆順所  謂含德之厚也歟
Interpretation

This scripture, through the annotations of various Daoist scholars, collectively elucidates the state of "profound virtue cultivation" (han de zhi hou). Emperor Xuanzong of Tang noted in his imperial commentary that those with profound virtue remain unperturbed by worries and untouched by pathogenic Qi, rendering them impervious to external harm. This echoes Zhuangzi's teaching that one who maintains a mind as open and empty as a valley remains invulnerable to injury.

Chen Jingyuan (Bixuzi) elaborates specifically: venomous creatures like wasps and scorpions sting with their tails, fierce beasts like tigers and leopards attack with claws, and birds of prey like eagles strike with wings and talons. Yet the "perfected person" (zhiren) who has attained the highest state of cultivation transcends all worldly concerns, maintaining the pure innocence of an infant. With their Shen (spirit) perfectly intact, no external force can harm them.

Su Zhe (Yingbin) analyzes this from the essence of Dao: The Dao is formless, hence invulnerable. Human suffering arises from discriminative thinking. With discrimination comes form; with form comes opposition; with opposition comes harm. But like an infant free from discrimination, such a person offers no point of opposition for external things to attack.

Both Wang Anshi (Linchuan) and Cao Daochong (Daozhen Renjing Xiansheng) emphasize that infants harbor no intention to harm, thus receiving no harm in return. Liu Ji (Qingyuanzi) adds that such individuals preserve their heavenly nature intact, their spirit leaving no gaps for external forces to penetrate. As Zhuangzi illustrated with the drunken man who falls from a carriage yet remains unharmed—his mind free from fear of life and death—if even drunkenness can offer such protection, how much more so for one in complete harmony with the celestial Dao?

Huang Maocun employs the story of Liang Yang taming wild beasts to demonstrate this principle. Liang could make tigers, wolves, and eagles coexist peacefully in his garden by eliminating all mental distinctions, viewing beasts and birds as kin. This state of "no opposition or compliance in the heart" (xin wu ni shun)—where one makes no mental separation between hostility and submission—precisely embodies the manifestation of profound virtue cultivation.

骨弱筋柔而握固未知牝牡之合而峻作精 之至也  御註曰德全者形全故骨弱筋柔而握固  形全者神全故未知牝牡之合而峻作精  之至者可以入神莊子曰聖人貴精  碧虚子陳景元曰赤子未知喜怒而拳握  至堅者以其眞性專一故也峻者赤子之  命源也情欲未萌而陽德自動者眞精之  氣運行之所至也以况至人虚心無情氣  蓮自動而諸欲莫干也上清洞眞品云人  之生也禀天地之氣爲神爲形受元一之  氣爲液爲精天氣减耗神將散矣地氣减  耗形將病矣元氣减耗命將竭矣故帝一  回元之道泝流百脉上補泥丸腦實則神  全神全則形全形全者百關調於内邪氣  亡於外髓凝爲骨腸化爲筋純粹不雜而  長生可致矣峻作古本作全作王弼曰作  長也無物以損其身故能全長也  涑水司馬光曰皆在其自然  穎濱蘇轍曰無執而自握無欲而自作是  以知其精有餘而非心也  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰手未能把執攫  奪取掇心無所知而手無所用故自然握  固未知牝牡之合而峻作人禀五行全氣  精力氣血既盛則因牝牡發泄而嬰兒未  知嗜慾無所流散而時爲跳躑伸縮頓奮  之狀此謂峻作  達眞子曰骨弱筋柔而握固體之自然也  不爲物屈矣未知牝牡之合而峻作性之  自然也不爲情亂矣
Interpretation

Though an infant's bones are soft and sinews supple, its tiny fists can grasp with surprising strength; though unaware of male-female union, its vital essence naturally arises. These phenomena manifest the ultimate plenitude of Jing (essence).

Emperor Huizong of Song (Imperial Commentary) explains: Those with perfected De (virtue) naturally possess complete physical form—hence an infant's softness yet firm grip. Those with complete form naturally possess abundant Shen (spirit)—hence spontaneous essence movement without knowledge of intimacy. Those with essence at its ultimate plenitude may enter divine states. As Zhuangzi said, sages prize the nurturing of essence above all.

Chen Jingyuan (Master Bixu) elaborates: Infants know neither joy nor anger, yet grasp so powerfully because their heavenly nature remains pure and undivided. The term "vigorous activation" refers to the primal source of infant vitality. Before emotions stir, prenatal Yang Qi flows naturally—this is the movement of true essential Qi. Like Dao-realized adepts whose empty minds harbor no desires, their genuine Qi circulates unimpeded by cravings.

The Shangqing Dongzhen Scripture records: Human life forms when celestial Qi constitutes spirit and earthly Qi forms the body, both transformed from primordial Qi into fluids and essence. If celestial Qi (Yang) wanes, spirit scatters; if earthly Qi (Yin) declines, illness follows; if primordial Qi diminishes, life fails. Thus the "Emperor's Return to Origin" practice reverses Qi flow through meridians to nourish the brain (mud pellet). A replenished brain strengthens spirit; strong spirit perfects form—harmonizing all vessels internally while repelling external pathogens, hardening marrow and softening sinews. Maintaining this pristine state ensures longevity.

Sima Guang (Master Sushui) considers these natural phenomena. Su Zhe (Master Yingbin) observes: Fists clench without intention, essence arises without desire—demonstrating that essence's plenitude requires no artificial effort.

Cao Daochong (Master Dao Zhen Ren Jing) clarifies: Infant hands don't grasp objects nor minds entertain distractions, hence their natural firm grip. Their spontaneous essence movement reveals humanity's innate Five Phase essence. When adults' Qi-blood peaks, they release through union—but infants, unbound by desire, express essence through spontaneous movements like waving limbs.

Master Da Zhen concludes: Soft bones with strong grasp show form's natural state, unaffected by externals; innocent essence-arising reveals nature's spontaneous flow, undisturbed by passions.

 陳象古曰握固則無所欲得而自執也峻  作則不因有爲而自動也  清源子劉驥曰德全則形全故骨弱筋柔  而握固形全則精全故未知牝牡之合而  峻作無執而自握無欲而峻作以一心定  而萬物服精之至也  程大昌曰握固峻作非知而爲之也眞淳  未散不知其然而然 終日號而嗌不嗄和之至也  御註曰致一之謂精精則德全而神不虧  冲氣以爲和和則氣全而嗌不嗄人之生  也精受於天一而爲智之源和得於天五  而爲信之本及其至也可以入神可以復  命而失其赤子之心者精摇而不守氣暴  而不純馳其形性潜之萬物豈不悲夫  碧虚子陳景元曰號啼也啼極無聲曰嗄  又聲嘶也夫赤子終日皞啼而嗌不嘶散  者天和之氣至全也故眞人之息以踵其  嗌不哇而和氣全也  潁濱蘇轍曰心動則氣傷氣傷則號而嗄  終日號而不嗄是以知其心不動而氣和  也  臨川王安石曰終日號而聲不嗄乃和之  至蓋和者主於氣也  程大昌曰是其淳和中充皞啼所不能變  也故得取以喻和也 知和曰常  御註曰純氣之守制命在内形化而性不  亡  碧虚子陳景元曰夫和者大同於物故赤  子以和全眞至人知和之貴也故用之爲  常道  潁濱蘇轍曰和者不以外傷内也復命曰  常遇物而知反其本者也知和曰常得本
Interpretation

This passage presents annotations by several Daoist scholars on concepts from the Daode Jing such as "firm gripping" (握固), "erection" (峻作), and "crying all day without becoming hoarse," primarily discussing the pure and natural state of infants. Here is the modern interpretation:

Chen Xianggu explains that an infant's natural clenching of fists (握固) is not deliberately sought but occurs spontaneously; similarly, erections (峻作) arise naturally without conscious intent. Liu Ji (Qingyuanzi) elaborates that when Virtue (De) is complete, the body becomes whole—hence, though an infant's bones are soft, it can grip firmly. When the body is whole, Essence (Jing) and Qi (vital energy) are abundant—thus, though unaware of sexual union, it naturally experiences erections. This state of unconscious gripping and desireless responsiveness arises from single-minded concentration that aligns with the natural order, representing the pinnacle of Jing-Qi refinement.

Cheng Dachang observes that an infant's fist-clenching and erections are not willed actions but spontaneous manifestations of the untainted primordial Qi (先天纯真之气) before its dissipation. An infant crying all day without growing hoarse demonstrates the perfect harmony of Yin-Yang energies.

Emperor Huizong of Song (in his imperial commentary) states that undivided focus is called "Jing" (精). When Jing-Qi is abundant, Virtue (De) is complete, and the Spirit (Shen) remains undiminished. The blending of Yin-Yang energies forms "harmony" (和)—when harmony is full, breath flows smoothly, and the voice stays clear. At birth, Jing derives from the Celestial One (天一, primordial Qi), the root of wisdom; harmony stems from the Celestial Five (天五, the balanced Five Phases), the foundation of trust. At its zenith, this state connects with the divine and returns to innate nature. Those who lose this childlike purity see their Jing-Qi unsettled and unanchored, their breath turbulent and impure. Indulging in bodily and mental excesses, they drown among worldly things—a lamentable fate.

Chen Jingyuan (Bixuzi) clarifies that extreme crying without sound is termed "hoarseness" (嗄). Infants cry incessantly yet remain unharmed because their natural harmony is utterly intact. Thus, those who attain the Dao breathe deeply (息以踵) without hoarseness, their harmony perfected. Su Zhe (Yingbin) argues that mental agitation injures Qi, and injured Qi leads to hoarse crying. An infant's uninterrupted crying without hoarseness proves its mind unmoved and Qi harmonized. Wang Anshi adds that crying all day unhoarsely epitomizes ultimate harmony, for "harmony" governs the movement of Qi.

Cheng Dachang describes this as the state where pristine harmony fills the body, unshaken even by crying—thus serving as a metaphor for the realm of "harmony." Recognizing harmony's principle is called "constancy" (常, the eternal law). Emperor Huizong explains that preserving undivided Qi lets life be inwardly governed; though the form changes, innate nature remains unbroken. Chen Jingyuan states that "harmony" is unity with all things—infants preserve heavenly purity through it, while Daoist adepts treasure it as constant truth. Su Zhe concludes that "harmony" shields the inner self from external harm; returning to innate nature is "constancy"—encountering the world yet reverting to the root; knowing harmony is "constancy"—grasping the fundamental.

Through the infant's natural state, this passage elucidates key Daoist concepts like "Jing-Qi," "harmony," and "returning to innate nature," emphasizing the cultivation of primordial purity and effortless non-action (Wuwei).

 以應萬物者也其實一道也故皆謂之常  臨川王安石曰和之爲用則常而不變  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰和者生理之常  非别有方法  陳象古曰知此和之至可以常行而不離  清源子劉驥曰知和則純粹不雜靜一不  變而與天地爲常  黄茂村曰號而不嗄和之至也知此則爲  復歸於嬰兒矣故能長乆 知常曰明  御註曰明足以見道者知性之不亡故也  臨川王安石曰不明則不足以知常  清源子劉驥曰知常則朝徹見獨無古無  今而與日月參光  黄茂材曰常久也日月得天而能乆照四  時變化而能久成聖人乆於其道而天下  化成非夫明智洞達天地造化之機安能  識之 益生曰祥  御註曰祥者物之先見生物之理增之則  贅禍福特未定也  碧虚子陳景元曰祥者吉凶之兆也夫一  受其成形而素分已定若非理益之必致  凶祥  潁濱蘇轍曰生不可益而欲益之則非其  正矣祥妖也  陸佃曰達生之情常任於自然而不益生  故能出乎吉凶之表  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰但於身命有益  者則爲吉祥過此雖外美而内不善非生  之祥也  達眞子曰祥者非其常也  陳象古曰保此常守此明日益日生至於  盛大無凶咎也  黄茂村曰天下之人或夭於嬰孩或喪於  强壯其能保百年之壽者幾何今吾益吾
Interpretation

This passage explores the central position of "harmony" (和) in Daoist philosophy. Harmony represents the fundamental principle governing all phenomena, essentially manifesting the Dao itself, and is therefore regarded as the eternal constant.

Wang Anshi explains that when harmony functions properly, it maintains an unchanging state. Cao Daochong (known by his Daoist name Master Renjing) considers harmony to be the natural law of life’s operation, not some extraordinary method. Chen Xianggu states that those who truly comprehend the ultimate state of harmony can consistently abide by it without deviation.

Liu Ji (Daoist name Qingyuanzi) further elaborates that understanding the principle of harmony allows one to remain pure and uncluttered, tranquil and unchanging in essence, aligning with the natural rhythms of heaven and earth. Huang Maocun uses the metaphor of an infant, noting that though a baby cries, its voice never grows hoarse—this exemplifies the highest state of harmony. Grasping this principle enables a return to the infant’s pure simplicity, ensuring longevity.

The next section explains "knowing the constant is called enlightenment" (知常曰明): true wisdom lies in understanding eternal laws. The Emperor’s commentary notes that enlightened individuals perceive the Dao clearly because they recognize that intrinsic nature never perishes. Wang Anshi adds that without sufficient wisdom, one cannot comprehend the constant. Liu Ji argues that understanding the constant allows clarity like the morning sun, transcending past and present, shining alongside the sun and moon. Huang Maocai compares it to the movement of celestial bodies and seasonal cycles, emphasizing that enlightened individuals discern the profound mysteries of cosmic creation.

Regarding "forcing life's increase is called inauspicious" (益生曰祥), the text warns that artificially prolonging life invites misfortune. Chen Jingyuan (Daoist name Bixuzi) explains that "auspiciousness" (祥) originally signifies omens of fortune or calamity. Since human form and destiny are predetermined, violating natural laws to forcibly extend life brings ill omens. Su Zhe asserts that life should not be artificially prolonged, as such efforts constitute unnatural practices—what appears as "auspicious" is actually ominous. Lu Dian advocates following life’s inherent nature without forced intervention, allowing transcendence beyond fortune and misfortune.

Cao Daochong points out that only what truly benefits body and mind is auspicious; beyond this, even outwardly beautiful but inwardly corrupt things cannot be life’s blessings. Dazhenzi remarks that "auspiciousness" is not the norm. Chen Xianggu states that maintaining this constancy and enlightenment naturally strengthens life, free from calamity. Huang Maocai laments that many die young, with few reaching a hundred years, emphasizing the need to nurture life in accordance with the natural Dao.

 生而使長生不死在於天下豈不曰祥乎 心使氣曰强  御註曰體合於心心合於氣則氣和而不  暴兹强也以與物敵而非自勝之道  碧虚子陳景元曰心有是非而氣無分别  潁濱蘇轍曰氣惡妄作而又以心使之則  强梁甚矣  臨川王安石曰氣者當專氣致柔今反爲  心之所使不能專守於内則爲暴矣此祥  者非作善之祥乃災異之祥此强者非守  氣之强乃勝暴之强夫言豈一端而已各  有所當也  道眞仁靜先生曹道沖曰心動而使氣氣  作而形隨未有動作而不求强好勝者也  眞人心不動而氣自動亦若人之眠睡外  務已息泯然無知而寐中手足瞤動豈心  之使而動也一寐尚然况寂然在道者也  黄茂材曰以力使氣是氣也爲暴戾之氣  以心使氣是氣也爲沖和之氣沖和之氣  充於一身天地不能使之天鬼神不能使  之灾聲色利欲不能使之亂豈不曰强乎 物壯則老是謂不道不道早已  碧虚子陳景元曰夫物之壯也必至乎枯  老心之强也必至於凶暴且道以柔弱爲  用今以强壯爲心者謂之不道已止也死  也言不行道者早死也已  潁濱蘇轍曰益生使氣不能聽其自然日  入於剛强而老從之則失其赤子之性矣  臨川王安石曰惟道則先於天地而不爲  壯長於上古而不爲老  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰雖欲不止如何
Interpretation

Is it not auspicious for humans to desire immortality and eternal existence in this world? The key lies in how to use the mind to guide the Qi (referring to the internal energy circulation in cultivation).

True strength comes from allowing the mind to naturally guide the Qi. When the body aligns with the mind, and the mind merges with the Qi, the Qi becomes harmonious and non-violent—this is genuine vitality. If one deliberately uses Qi to oppose the external world, it is not the true path of self-transcendence.

Master Chen Jingyuan of the Bixu lineage noted: the mind distinguishes right from wrong, but Qi itself is without discrimination. Su Zhe (Yingbin) added: Qi should not be forcibly moved; if one compels it with the mind, it becomes excessively rigid. Wang Anshi (Linchuan) argued: cultivation should focus on refining Qi to achieve softness. If, instead, Qi is driven by the mind, it cannot be internally preserved and becomes violent. Such so-called "auspiciousness" is not a sign of virtuous fortune but rather an omen of calamity; this kind of "strength" is not the true power of conserving Qi but merely brute force surpassing violence. Words should not be taken at face value—each has its proper context.

Cao Daochong (the Daoist master known as Daozhen Renjing) explained: when the mind stirs, it drives the Qi, and when Qi moves, the body follows. Any action inevitably involves contention. However, a realized Daoist’s mind remains unmoved while Qi flows naturally, just as when a person sleeps—external affairs cease, and though unconscious, subtle movements of hands and feet still occur. Is this driven by the mind? If even sleep is like this, how much more so in the silent state of unity with the Dao?

Huang Maocai distinguished two kinds of Qi: Qi forcibly driven becomes violent energy, while Qi guided by the mind transforms into harmonious Qi (peaceful and pervasive life force). When this harmonious Qi fills the entire body, neither heaven nor earth can disturb it, ghosts and spirits cannot harm it, and sensual desires cannot unsettle it—this is true strength.

All things that grow strong inevitably decline—this is contrary to the Dao. Chen Jingyuan of the Bixu lineage said: when objects become strong, they eventually wither; when the mind grows forceful, it leads to violence. The Dao takes softness and weakness as its root. To pursue strength as an ideal is to deviate from the Great Way. "Ceasing" here means termination—death. Those who oppose the Dao meet an early end.

Su Zhe believed: deliberately forcing the breath to prolong life, making it unnatural, leads to increasing rigidity and inevitable aging, losing the pure nature of an infant. Wang Anshi stated: only the Dao existed before heaven and earth yet never appeared strong, enduring since ancient times without showing signs of age. Cao Daochong countered: even if one wishes not to cease aging, what can be done? (Implying that defying natural laws ultimately leads to extinction.)

 哉  葉夢得曰是以已之亦貴乎早也  黄茂材曰壯而老老而已在物莫不然若  知道者可與天地相爲終始豈有已乎    知者不言章第五十六 知者不言言者不知塞其免閉其門挫其鋭 解其紛和其光同其塵是謂玄同  御註曰道無問問無應知道者默而識之  無所事言齧缺問於王倪所以四問而四  不知多言數窮離道遠矣  碧虚子陳景元曰莊子曰知北游於玄水  之上登隱弅之丘而適遭無爲謂焉知謂  無爲謂曰子欲有問乎若何思何慮則知  道何處何服則安道何從何道則得道三  問而無爲謂不答也非不答不知答也知  不得問反於白水之南登狐闋之上而覩  狂屈焉知以之言也問乎狂屈狂屈曰唉  予知之將語若中欲言而忘其所欲言知  不得問反於帝宫見黄帝而問焉黄帝曰  無思無慮始知道無處無服始安道無從  無道始得道知問黄帝曰我與若知之彼  與彼不知也其敦是耶帝曰彼無爲謂眞  是也狂屈似之我與知終不近也  潁濱蘇轍曰道非言說亦不離言說然能  知者未必言能言者未必知唯塞免閉門  以杜其外挫鋭解紛和光同塵以治其内  默然不言而與道同  臨川王安石曰挫其鋭同其塵此文兩見  蓋道德莫不皆如此  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰契理則忘言雖
Interpretation

Ye Mengde said: Therefore, spiritual cultivation is most valuable when begun early. Huang Maocai added: All things follow the natural course from vigor to decline, but those who understand the Dao (the Way) can coexist with heaven and earth—how could there ever be an end for them?

In the chapter "Those Who Know Do Not Speak," it is said: Those who truly understand the Dao do not indulge in empty talk, while those who love to preach do not genuinely comprehend it. One must block the openings of desire, shut the gates of temptation, blunt sharp edges, resolve conflicts, soften brilliance, and blend with the mundane world—this is how one attains the state of "mysterious unity" (profound harmony with the Dao).

Emperor Huizong of Song (in his imperial commentary) explained: The Dao cannot be explored through questions and answers; those who truly attain it do so through silent realization. Just as in the Zhuangzi, when Nie Que questioned Wang Ni with four inquiries and received no answers, the more one speaks, the farther one strays from the Dao.

Chen Jingyuan (Master Bixu) cited a story from the Zhuangzi: A man named "Knowledge" sought the Dao by the Dark Waters, encountering Wuweiwei (Do-Nothing-Say-Nothing), Kuangqu (Madly-Darting), and the Yellow Emperor. Wuweiwei remained silent to all three questions; Kuangqu wanted to speak but suddenly forgot what to say; only the Yellow Emperor told him: "You understand the Dao by not thinking about it, abide in it by not striving for it, and attain it by not seeking it." Yet the Yellow Emperor concluded that Wuweiwei was the one who truly embodied the Dao, Kuangqu was close to it, while he and "Knowledge" were still far from it.

Su Zhe (Yingbin) believed: Though the Dao cannot be fully expressed in words, it is not entirely divorced from them. The key is to shut out external temptations while maintaining inner peace and detachment—silence brings one closer to the Dao.

Wang Anshi (Linchuan) pointed out: The phrase "Blunt the sharpness, resolve the tangles" appears repeatedly in the Daodejing, indicating it is a universal principle of cultivation.

Cao Daochong (Master Daozhen Renjing) concluded: Those who truly unite with the Dao forget words, just as one forgets the fish trap after catching the fish. The essence lies in grasping the spirit, not clinging to the text.

 言而不能行與不知道何異兊口也緘口  默行不須說也三要七竅爲身之門户自  内其散失者神氣精血機情好惡自外而  入者縁境聲色滋味寒暑所失者眞所入  者假故閉其門也彼方爲光顯沮之則爲  怨俱與和之於己何損彼方塵垢外之則  不樂故至人韜光隱德暫與同之於身何  浼玄者隱密不顯不自飾智矜俗獨異於  衆  清源子劉驥曰天地有大美而不言四時  有明法而不議萬物有成理而不說聖人  行不言之教譬如知音者識音以弦心知  其音口不能傳道深微妙知者不言不知  道者以言相煩多言數窮去道遠矣善爲  道者默而識之性以成之塞其免則收視  反聽閉其門則形全精復挫其鋭則歸精  神乎無始解其紛則體純素而不雜和其  光則含光不耀同其塵則大同無己夫如  是則與天同心而無知與道同身而無體  是謂玄同豈拘拘然自投於親疏利害貴  賤之間哉  程大昌曰塞免閉門不使衆人得見其經  歷出入之地也挫鋭解紛平夷而簡易也  和光同塵則能降己齊物矣凡爲此皆求  至乎渾兮其若濁者也彼我一觀高下無  别是之謂同同之上加元焉深而又深侣  鷗群獸幾微更不外見又諸家釋免皆本  易之免悦爲義恐不然也詩曰行道兊矣  毛氏曰免成蹊也成蹊者孟子謂山間之
Interpretation

If one only knows how to speak but cannot act accordingly, how is this any different from not understanding the principles at all? Just as the mouth may speak, those who are truly wise often choose silence. The human body has three vital centers (referring to the upper, middle, and lower Dantian) and seven apertures (eyes, ears, nose, mouth, etc.), all of which serve as gateways for internal and external exchange. What flows outward from within are Jing (essence), Qi (vital energy), Shen (spirit), blood, and all manner of emotions and desires; what invades from the outside are sensory temptations and the fluctuations of heat and cold—what is lost is the true vitality, while what enters is mere illusion. Thus, one must close these gateways.

When others flaunt their brilliance, directly opposing them will only invite resentment. It is better to temporarily accommodate them, as this does no harm to oneself. When others are mired in worldly filth, forcefully rejecting them will only provoke displeasure. Therefore, those who have attained the Dao (the Way) restrain their radiance and conceal their De (Virtue), temporarily harmonizing with the mundane world—this does not taint their true nature. "Mystery" (Xuan) means remaining hidden and unassuming, neither flaunting wisdom nor striving for novelty.

Liu Ji, the Daoist master Qingyuanzi, explains: Heaven and Earth possess supreme beauty yet never proclaim it; the four seasons follow their laws without discussion; all things have their inherent principles yet need no explanation. The sage practices "teaching without words," just as a skilled musician communicates through the strings of a zither, conveying meaning beyond speech. The Dao is profound and subtle—those who truly understand it do not speak much, while those who do not understand only add confusion with words. The more one speaks, the farther one strays from the Dao. True cultivators silently internalize it, allowing their nature to naturally fulfill itself. By blocking the apertures of the ears and eyes, one can turn inward in vision and hearing; by closing the gates of desire, one preserves the body and restores vitality. Withdrawing sharp edges allows the spirit to return to its source; dissolving conflicts purifies the body and mind. Harmonizing radiance makes it gentle and unobtrusive; blending with the dust of the world leads to forgetting the self and all things. Only then can one share the heart of Heaven, free from cunning, and unite with the Dao, leaving no trace. This is the state of "mysterious unity" (Xuantong)—how could it be constrained by worldly distinctions like closeness or distance, nobility or baseness?

Cheng Dachang adds: Blocking the apertures and closing the gateways means not allowing others to see one's path of cultivation. Withdrawing sharp edges and resolving conflicts means returning to simplicity and harmony. Harmonizing radiance and blending with the dust means letting go of the self and viewing all things equally. These practices all aim to achieve a state of turbid simplicity—eliminating distinctions is called "unity," and adding the word "mysterious" (Xuan) to it signifies a deeper fusion, like gulls mingling in flocks or beasts resting together without revealing the slightest difference. Many commentaries interpret "Dui" (兌) as the joy mentioned in the Book of Changes, but in the Book of Songs, the phrase "the path is Dui" refers to a small trail, much like the mountain paths mentioned by Mencius.

 蹊介然用之而成路者是也其讀如税 不可得而親不可得而疏不可得而利不可 得而害不可得而貴不可得而賤故爲天下 貴  御註曰世之人愛惡相攻而有戚疏之態  情僞相感而有利害之見用舍相權而有  貴賤之分反覆更代未始有極奚足爲天  下貴  碧虚子陳景元曰上交於道而不諂舉世  舉之而不勸故不可得而親暱也下交於  器而不瀆舉世非之而不沮故不可得而  疏隔也澹泊無欲守分知足故不可得而  利誘也處卑不辱在醜不爭故不可得而  陷害也爵禄不能污權勢不能動故不可  得而貴寵也失志不屈居貧愈安故不可  得而賤鄙也夫至人行此六行不榮通不  醜窮無天怨無人非無物累無鬼責故爲  天下貴  潁濱蘇轍曰可得而親則可得而疏可得  而利則可得而害可得而貴則可得而賤  體道者均覆萬物而孰爲親疏等觀逆順  而敦爲利害不知榮辱而孰爲貴賤情計  之所不及此所以爲天下貴也  陸佃曰神人者不即不離無縛無脱故不  可得而親踈不生不滅無取無舍故不可  得而利害不損不益無得無失故不可得  而貴賤夫惟如此故能無對於物旁日月  挾宇宙天地爲一官萬物爲一府其緒餘  足以爲天下國家其土苴足以治天下其  糠粃塵垢足以陶鑄堯舜而天下之物豈
Interpretation

The passage discusses the attitude and realm of the Daoist "Perfect Man" (one who has attained the highest state of cultivation).

When people frequently tread a small path, it becomes a visible road. But a true adept of the Dao remains unbound by worldly ties: you cannot move him with intimacy, nor affect him with distance; you cannot tempt him with profit, nor threaten him with harm; neither can you elevate him with honor, nor demean him with lowliness. Precisely because he transcends these worldly standards, he becomes truly revered by all under heaven.

Emperor Huizong of Song's commentary notes that ordinary people create distinctions of closeness and distance through competing affections and aversions, calculate gains and losses through the interplay of emotions and artifice, and establish hierarchies of nobility and baseness through weighing choices. These opposing cycles endlessly alternate without cessation, utterly unworthy of universal reverence.

Chen Jingyuan (Master Bixu) further explains: The Perfect Man associates with the Great Dao without flattery—even universal praise cannot make him arrogant, thus intimacy cannot move him. He interacts with material things without contempt—even universal criticism cannot make him despondent, thus distance cannot affect him. Serene and desireless, content with his lot, he remains untempted by profit. Dwelling in humility without shame, facing ugliness without contention, he remains unthreatened by harm. Neither rank nor stipend can taint him; neither power nor influence can shake him—thus honor cannot elevate him. Undaunted in adversity, more at ease in poverty—thus lowliness cannot demean him. By embodying these six virtues, neither exalting in prominence nor ashamed of hardship, free from heaven's wrath or human blame, unburdened by external things, unaccused by spirits, he becomes universally revered.

Su Zhe (Yingbin) adds: What can be made intimate can be made distant; what can be tempted by gain can be threatened by loss; what can be elevated can be debased. Those who embody the Dao regard all things equally—how could they distinguish intimacy from distance? Viewing fortune and misfortune alike—how could they separate profit from harm? Knowing nothing of honor or disgrace—how could they discern nobility from baseness? These realms transcend ordinary human understanding, hence their universal reverence.

Lu Dian concludes: The Divine Man (the Dao-realized) neither deliberately approaches nor avoids, neither bound nor deliberately liberated—thus unaffected by intimacy or distance. Neither born nor perishing, neither grasping nor rejecting—thus unmoved by profit or loss. Neither increasing nor decreasing, neither gaining nor losing—thus unmeasured by nobility or baseness. Therefore, they shine with the sun and moon, coexist with the cosmos, viewing heaven and earth as a single chamber, all things as one treasury. The energy they spare suffices to govern nations; the things they discard suffice to teach humanity—even their dregs and dust could produce sage-kings like Yao and Shun. How could anything in this world possibly affect such Perfect Men?

 復有加哉故曰爲天下貴  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰未嘗與物交焉  能親也不使欲厭焉能疏也不妄求取焉  能利也不犯禁忌焉能害也不取榮盛焉  能貴也不處卑猥焉能賤也  陳象古曰親疏利害貴賤世之所重衆人  之所分别者也大道所在名非常名不可  見其形不可聞其聲况可得而親疏利害  貴賤乎  黄茂材曰孔子曰吾觀老子其猶龍乎夫  龍豈可得而親之疏之利之害之貴之賤  之者乎既曰不可得而貴又曰爲天下貴  何也蓋亦自貴而已經曰知我者希則我
Interpretation

This passage elucidates how the Dao (the fundamental cosmic principle) transcends worldly value judgments. Cao Daochong, a Northern Song dynasty Daoist master, explains: The true Dao never actively engages with all things, yet naturally remains close to them; it doesn't inflame desires, yet maintains appropriate distance; it doesn't deliberately seek gain, yet benefits all beings; it doesn't violate taboos, yet avoids calamities; it doesn't pursue glory, yet maintains nobility; it doesn't sink into baseness, yet rises above vulgarity.

Chen Xianggu, a Song dynasty scholar, adds: Concepts like closeness/distance, benefit/harm, and nobility/baseness are distinctions clung to by worldly people. The true "Great Dao" transcends these relative concepts—it has no fixed form and emits no audible sound, so how could it possibly be measured by mundane standards?

Huang Maocai, another Song scholar, references Confucius' famous analogy comparing Laozi to a dragon: Just as the divine dragon cannot be defined by categories like closeness/distance, benefit/harm, or nobility/baseness, so too is the Great Dao. If we say the Dao cannot be measured by worldly standards, why then is it called "the most noble under heaven"? This is because the Dao inherently possesses supreme value. As the scripture states: "The fewer who understand me, the more precious I become"—true nobility lies not in worldly recognition, but in its intrinsically sublime nature.

(Note: The "dragon analogy"典故 originates from Records of the Grand Historian's "Biographies of Laozi and Han Fei," where Confucius used the metaphor of an elusive dragon to describe the unfathomable depth of Laozi's thought.)

 貴矣 道德眞經集註卷之十三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0095); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 12 Vol. 14 →