中文 · EN

《道德真經集註(二)》Vol. 2

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 2 / 18 7,185 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經集註(二)》 Vol. 2 (Dongshen 洞神部, 18 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 14 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經集註(二)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經集註卷之二      恃五     宋鶴林眞逸彭耜纂集   道沖章第四 道沖而用之或不盈淵兮似萬物宗  御註曰道有情有信故有用無爲無形故  不盈沖者中也是謂大和莊子曰鯢桓之  審爲淵止水之審爲淵流水之審爲淵淵  虚而靜不與物雜道之體也惟虚也故群  實之所歸惟靜也故群動之所屬是萬物  之所係一化之所待也故曰似萬物之宗  然道本無係物自宗道故似之而已  碧虚子陳景元曰冲虚也又中也或不定  之辭也又常也淵深靜也兮者深嘆咏道  之辭也明此沖虚之道不虧不盈體性凝  湛深不可測故謂之淵也夫不測之理非  有非無難以定名故寄言似也群生日用  注酌湛然體含萬象善惡斯保動植咸歸  故爲萬物之宗  潁濱蘇轍曰夫道沖然至無耳然以之適  衆有雖天地之大山河之廣無所不遍以  其無形故似不盈者淵兮深渺吾知其爲  萬物宗也而不敢正言之故曰似萬物之  宗  臨川王安石曰道有體有用體者元氣之  不動用者沖氣運行於天地之間其沖氣  至虚而一在天則爲天五在地則爲地六  蓋沖氣爲元氣之所生既至虚而一則或  如不盈似者不敢正名其道也  陸佃曰道者用之以沖則雖遍法界而不  見其盈深不可識而爲萬物之宗師言或
Interpretation

The Dao is empty and centered in harmony. In applying it to the myriad things, it seems never to be filled or exhausted. Deep and vast, silent and unfathomable, it appears to be the ultimate source to which all things return. The ancients did not dare say outright that it was the sovereign of all existence, and so they said only that it “seems” to be the source of all things.

The Dao is formless and grasp-free, yet it has feeling and trustworthiness, and so it can be effective. It acts without action and has no image, so it never overflows. “Emptiness” means being empty while keeping to the center; it is a state of great harmony. Zhuangzi said: the depths of a whirlpool are an abyss, the depths of still water are an abyss, and the depths of flowing water are also an abyss. An abyss is empty and still, unmixed with the confusion of things—this is the very nature of the Dao. Because it is empty, the solid forms of all things return to it; because it is still, all movement and change depend on it. Thus it is what all things rely on and what the great transformation awaits, and it is called “seemingly the source of all things.” In truth, the Dao depends on nothing; things themselves take the Dao as their source. That is why one can only say it “seems” to be so.

“Emptiness” means empty, and also centered. “Perhaps” expresses uncertainty, or something enduring. “Abyss” means deep stillness; “ah” is a sigh of deep reverence for the Dao. This empty Dao neither diminishes nor increases. Its nature is settled, clear, and unfathomably deep, so it is called an abyss. What cannot be fathomed is neither being nor nonbeing, and cannot be given a definite name; one can only say it “seems” so. All that living beings need in daily life comes from it as naturally as drawing water from a deep pool. It contains the myriad forms; good and evil alike are preserved within it, and plants and animals all return to it. Thus it is the source of all things.

Su Zhe said: The Dao is utterly empty, yet it fills heaven, earth, mountains, and rivers. Because it is formless, it seems not to be full. It is deep and distant. Knowing it to be the source of all things, we dare not speak of it directly, and so say “seemingly.”

Wang Anshi said: The Dao has substance and function. Its substance is the primordial Qi, unmoving; its function is the flowing Qi of emptiness, moving through heaven and earth. This flowing Qi is utterly empty and unified: in Heaven it is “Heaven’s Five,” and on Earth it is “Earth’s Six.” The flowing Qi arises from the primordial Qi; it is utterly empty and unified, and so it “perhaps” seems never to be full. “Seemingly” means that one does not dare give it a direct name.

Lu Dian said: Taking emptiness as its function, it extends throughout the Dharma Realm without ever seeming full. Deep beyond recognition, it is the teacher and source of all things. “Perhaps” conveys uncertainty and the reluctance to make a definite claim.

 似者言之不敢正也列子所謂疑獨莊子  所謂疑始是也  道眞仁靜先生曹道沖曰或者疑問之辭  也道貴通流而不絶不以定名而絶其變  通之妙故云似不盈疑似不自盈滿而虚  己者也淵者水之性言其淵澄不動似是  萬物之宗祖也  陳象古曰冲和也道有沖和之氣充塞於  天地之間雖如此而不自盈滿言其不可  測度準量也淵深妙之㫖也宗主也道無  作無爲於萬物而萬物因沖和之氣以生  故曰似萬物之宗  黃茂材曰一陰一陽之謂道沖者陰陽和  氣也而用之或不盈者虚故能應也淵兮  似萬物之宗者靜可以宗群有也  程大昌曰沖者盈之對謙沖幼沖大盈若  沖沖氣爲和皆以不極乎盈爲義或之者  疑之也似之者不敢主言也或不盈者非  誠有所缺少也疑之而已萬物之宗則無  之未出爲有者是矣不盈者未能遽及乎  無也則似之而已 挫其鋭解其紛和其光同其塵湛兮似或存  御註曰鋭則傷紛則雜挫其锐則不爭解  其紛則不亂和其光莊子所謂光矣而不  耀是也同其塵莊子所謂與物委蛇而同  其波是也湛兮似若存心若死灰而身若  槁木之枝泰定之中天光自照惛然若亡  而存油然不形而神此其道歟  穎濱蘇轍曰人莫不有道也而聖人能全  之挫其鋭恐其流於妄也解其紛恐其與
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the characteristics and manifestations of the Dao. Several Daoist scholars elucidate its profound mysteries from different perspectives.

Regarding the Dao's paradoxical nature of seeming both existent and non-existent, Liezi and Zhuangzi referred to it as "doubtful singularity" (yidu) and "doubtful origin" (yishi). Cao Daochong explains that the Dao's value lies in its ceaseless circulation—it cannot be confined by fixed names or limited by its transformations. Like the still, clear waters of an abyss that appear motionless yet serve as the source of all things. Chen Xianggu posits that the Dao permeates the harmonious Qi (vital energy) between heaven and earth, omnipresent yet never self-satisfied, defying conventional measurement.

Huang Maocai interprets the Dao through the lens of Yin-Yang as the harmonized Qi of these complementary forces—its emptiness enabling infinite responsiveness. Cheng Dachang supplements this by clarifying that "chong" (冲) signifies non-fullness, while "si" (似) indicates reluctance to make definitive claims, with all things originating in the liminal space between "being" (you) and "non-being" (wu).

Concerning cultivation methods like "blunting sharp edges" and "untying tangles," the Imperial Commentary explains: blunting锋芒 prevents conflict, resolving complications maintains purity, harmonizing radiance avoids ostentation, and merging with the mundane rejects exceptionalism. The mind should achieve the stillness of dead ashes or withered wood, allowing wisdom to emerge naturally through tranquility. Su Zhe observes that sages differ from ordinary people precisely in preserving the Dao's wholeness, using these methods to prevent distractions from delusions and material desires.

These interpretations collectively emphasize the Dao's simultaneously real yet elusive nature, requiring cultivation through Wuwei (non-action) and meditative stillness for genuine realization.

 物構也不流於妄不構於物外患已去而  光生焉又從而和之恐其與物異也光至  潔也塵至雜也雖塵無所不同恐其棄萬  物也如是而後全則湛然其常存矣雖存  而人莫之識故曰似或存耳  臨川王安石曰鋭者火之形紛者絲之形  挫其鋭圓成也解其紛靜一也和其光不  皦於上同其塵不昩於下  程大昌曰鋭才智之外形而有芒角者也  紛事之節目繁會而盤錯者也莊子之謂  膠膠擾擾者是也塵者在地非土在空非  氛以配世事則其浮游污雜者是也鋭挫  紛解則應物而不見其功光和塵同則混  俗而無以自表乍而觀之道若不屬斯人  矣徐而察其湛然無雜者則道未嘗不在  也 吾不知誰之子象帝之先  碧虚子陳景元曰吾者老氏自稱也象似  也我觀至道杳冥冲用不測匠成萬物今  古常存道既無祖無宗誰敢言孫言子彷  彿深思似出乎天帝之先矣  臨川王安石曰吾不知道是誰所生之子  象帝之先象者有形之始也帝者生物之  祖也故繫辭曰見乃謂之象帝出乎震其  道乃在天地之先  道眞仁靜先生曹道沖曰有象之大者莫  大於天故爲有象之君故曰象帝杳冥生  眞精眞精生沖氣沖氣生天地天地生萬  物惟道自然非物能生故云吾不知誰之  子似是象帝之先也  黃茂材曰吾不知其誰氏之子象帝之先
Interpretation

This passage explores the origin and nature of the Dao (the Way), with annotations from several Daoist thinkers offering diverse perspectives:

Wang Anshi employs metaphorical explanations: sharp as the edge of fire's blaze, entangled as silk threads in disarray. Blunting the sharp edges brings completeness, unraveling the tangles brings tranquility. Harmonizing radiance without glaring, merging with worldly dust without losing one's way. He views the Dao as transcending all tangible beginnings (xiang) and ancestral origins of life (di).

Cheng Dachang elaborates: sharpness refers to outward displays of intellect, while entanglement signifies complex affairs. The dust symbolizes the floating, mixed phenomena of the mundane world. When one dissolves sharp edges and untangles complexities, one can accord with all things without claiming merit; by tempering brilliance and blending with worldly dust, one integrates into society without self-promotion. Though appearing ordinary on the surface, this state embodies the pure Dao.

Chen Jingyuan interprets "wu" (I) as Laozi's self-reference. The Dao is profoundly unfathomable, generating all things yet having neither beginning nor end. Since the Dao has no ancestors, it logically cannot have descendants. It seems to have existed even before the Heavenly Emperor (Di).

Cao Daochong asserts: Heaven represents the greatest existence (xiangdi) in the manifest world. The Dao produces true essence (jing) and primordial qi (vital energy), which in turn generate heaven, earth, and the myriad things. Yet the Dao exists spontaneously, not created by anything.

Huang Maocai synthesizes: the Dao's origin remains unknowable, seemingly existing prior to the Heavenly Emperor. These scholars collectively emphasize how the Dao transcends concrete forms, precedes heaven and earth, serves as the source of all things while simultaneously merging indistinctly with creation.

 即道是已道本無名或謂化工或謂造物  或謂象帝之先皆强名也    天地章第五 天地不仁以萬物爲芻狗聖人不仁以百姓 爲芻狗  御註曰恩生於害害生於恩以仁爲恩害  則隨至天地之於萬物聖人之於百姓輔  其自然無愛利之心焉仁無得而名之束  芻爲狗祭祀所用適則用之過則棄之彼  萬物之自生百姓之自治曾何容心焉  碧虚子陳景元曰天地無恩而大恩生聖  人不仁而大仁成不仁謂無情於仁愛非  薄惡之也  潁濱蘇轍曰天地無私而聽萬物之自然  故萬物自生自死死非吾虐之生非吾仁  之也譬如結芻爲狗設之於祭祀盡飾以  奉之夫豈愛之時適然也既事而棄之行  者踐之夫豈惡之亦適然也聖人之於民  也亦然特無以害之則民全其性死生得  喪吾無與焉雖未當仁之而仁亦大矣  臨川王安石曰天地之於萬物聖人之於  百姓有愛也有所不愛也愛者仁也不愛  者亦仁也惟其愛不留於愛有如芻狗當  祭祀之用也盛之以篋函巾之以文綉尸  祝齊戒然後用之及其既祭之後行者踐  其首迹樵者焚其肢體天地之於萬物當  春生夏長如其有仁愛以及之至秋冬萬  物彫落非天地之不愛也  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰天地聖人至仁  而不自以爲仁故曰不仁  黃茂材曰天地之於萬物無傷而已任之
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the nature of the Dao (the Way) and the attitude of heaven/earth and sages toward all things. The Dao itself is nameless; people reluctantly call it "the work of creation" (zaohua zhi gong), "the creator," or "that which existed before the image-like Heavenly Emperor."

Chapter Five, "The Heaven and Earth Chapter," states: Heaven and earth show no partiality—they treat all things as straw dogs (sacrificial offerings). The sage does likewise, treating the common people as straw dogs. Here, several commentators offer different interpretations:

Emperor Huizong of Song explains that kindness can bring harm, and harm can also generate kindness. Heaven and earth's treatment of all things, and the sage's treatment of the people, both follow natural laws without deliberate affection or intentional benevolence. Just as straw dogs are used in rituals when needed and discarded afterward, all things and people grow naturally and govern themselves.

Chen Jingyuan (Bixu Zi) clarifies that while heaven and earth appear unkind, they produce great kindness; though the sage seems unmerciful, he achieves great benevolence. "Unmerciful" here refers to not deliberately displaying kindness, not to being cold-hearted.

Su Zhe (Yingbin) argues that heaven and earth are impartial, allowing all things to develop naturally. Life and death are natural processes, just like straw dogs—carefully adorned when used in rituals but discarded and trampled afterward, all according to circumstance. The sage treats the people the same way, refraining from interference or harm so they may preserve their inherent nature.

Wang Anshi (Linchuan) points out that heaven/earth and sages both love and do not love all things and people, yet both are expressions of benevolence. Just as straw dogs are valued during rituals but discarded afterward, all things seem cherished by heaven and earth in spring and summer, while their decline in autumn and winter does not mean heaven and earth have ceased to care.

Cao Daochong (Daozhen Renjing Xiansheng) concludes that heaven/earth and sages embody perfect benevolence yet never consider themselves benevolent—hence they are called "unmerciful."

Huang Maocai suggests that heaven and earth need only refrain from harming all things, allowing them to develop naturally.

 自遂聖人之於百姓無擾而已任之自生  任之自生故民無不生任之自遂故物無  不遂此其爲仁甚大若無顧愛之心故謂  天地聖人不仁申韓之學遂竊以爲刑名  其慘刻甚矣問之則曰聖人治天下無所  顧愛其說蓋起於此豈不失老子之意哉  程大昌曰結芻爲狗當祭則用已事而棄  是芻狗之時貴時賤者也天地之生化萬  物而遞相代謝實其似之苟有心於爲仁  其將孰爲乎爲此則妨彼利一而遺百其  爲仁亦勞而小矣概運一氣與物爲時使  根性與之相直者自生自化自形自色自  消自息而天地若無預焉此不仁之仁也  聖人無心而用大正以取法於天地也是  故未嘗曲愛一人而無一人不受其德也  莊子用此推之而曰至仁無親當使我忘  天下而天下亦自忘我此正不仁之仁概  加被冒而世人不知其德者也非眞相忘  也  林東曰老氏之於道其能游戲三昩者乎  說者以不仁乃所謂深仁如於乎不顯乃  所爲深顯王者不治夷狄乃所爲深治豈  有天地聖人以不仁稱之言天地聖人則  當以深仁目之此俗儒之淺於理者之所  云 天地之間其猶橐籥乎虚而不屈動而愈出  御註曰橐籥虚而能受受而能應故應而  不窮有實其中則觸處皆礙  碧虚子陳景元曰槖以鼔風吹火者也籥
Interpretation

This passage explores the core Daoist concept of "governing through non-action (Wuwei)." The sage ruler governs the people not through excessive intervention, but by allowing all things to develop according to their natural course. Just as heaven and earth treat all beings—appearing devoid of deliberate benevolence yet enabling everything to follow natural patterns.

The text critiques Legalist scholars like Shen Buhai and Han Fei for misinterpreting Laozi's original meaning by equating "non-benevolence" with ruthless penal techniques. In truth, heaven and earth give birth to all things like straw dogs used in sacrifices—honored during rituals but discarded afterward, embodying the natural cycle of renewal. Forced displays of benevolence create imbalance, whereas true "great benevolence" allows all beings to flourish in their proper place, appearing dispassionate yet containing ultimate compassion.

Zhuangzi further develops this idea with his notion that "perfect benevolence shows no partiality." Just as heaven and earth nurture all without conscious favor, the sage benefits everyone without special preference. What seems like mutual forgetfulness actually represents the highest form of all-encompassing care.

The passage employs the bellows (tuoyue) metaphor: only when hollow can it generate endless movement—stuffing it with objects would obstruct its function. This vividly illustrates the paradox of "non-action yet nothing left undone"—maintaining emptiness and stillness enables response to infinite changes. Chen Jingyuan explains the tuo as a wind-blowing tool and yue as a fire-blowing device, both demonstrating the power of emptiness.

Finally, it criticizes superficial Confucians who simplistically equate "non-benevolence" with cruelty. Like a king who stabilizes borders precisely by not overgoverning them, the apparent "non-benevolence" of heaven, earth, and sages constitutes the deepest benevolence. This paradoxical expression captures the essence of Daoist dialectical thinking.

 笛也言天地之間虚空無爲生物無私以  喻聖人之心虚廓淵靜應世不逆若橐之  懷風籥之含聲應用不絶而終不可屈也  以况聖人無私無心而不事愛利也  潁濱蘇轍曰橐與籥也方其一動氣之所  及無不摩也不知者以爲機巧極矣然橐  籥則何爲哉蓋亦虚而不屈是以動而愈  出耳  王雱曰橐籥虚以應物感則應應而不藏  天地之於萬物聖人之於百姓應其適然  而不係累於當時不留情於既往虚而不  屈者其體動而愈出者其用  清源子劉驥曰言天地則人在其中矣  晦庵朱熹曰虚而不屈動而愈出有一物  之不受則虚而屈矣有一物之不應是動  而不能出矣  黃茂材曰虚無體也故不屈動不已也故  愈出悟芻狗之說則可以忘形骸知橐籥  之理則可以鍊精炁  程大昌曰橐冶鞴也籥其管也橐也者吸  氣滿之而播諸冶鑪者也管也者受此吸  而嘘之所以播也 多言數窮不如守中  御註曰慎汝内閉汝外收視反聽復以見  天地之心焉此之謂守中  涑水司馬光曰能守中誠不言而信  穎濱蘇轍曰見其動而愈出不知其爲虚  中之報也故告之以多言數窮不如守中  之不窮也  清源子劉驥曰天地得一氣之妙而運行  不息聖人得一氣之妙而升降無窮其道  杳然難言哉若求之於多言則泥古人之
Interpretation

This scripture employs the metaphor of the bellows (tuoyue) to expound the core Daoist concept of "emptiness, stillness, and non-action (wuwei)." Though the interior of bellows is hollow, its movement generates an unceasing flow of wind—just as the space between heaven and earth appears void, yet effortlessly nurtures all things without selfish intent.

Commentators have interpreted this metaphor from various perspectives:

Su Zhe observes that while the bellows' operation appears skillful, it merely results from maintaining its natural empty state. Wang Pang further explains that heaven and earth treat all beings, just as sages treat common people, like the bellows—following nature's course without clinging to the past or being bound by the present. Liu Ji adds that this quality of emptiness and ceaseless vitality manifests both in cosmic movements and human affairs.

Zhu Xi employs reductio ad absurdum: the slightest attachment disrupts "emptiness," and any stagnation prevents "unceasing vitality." Huang Maocai grounds this theory in cultivation practice, suggesting that understanding this principle aids in refining Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy), foundational elements of Daoist cultivation. Cheng Dachang details the bellows' mechanical workings, using concrete observation to illuminate abstract philosophy.

The concluding section discusses the cultivation method of "guarding the center (shouzhong)." Imperial annotations define this as withdrawing the senses and turning inward in meditative practice. Sima Guang emphasizes that preserving inner authenticity naturally influences others. Su Zhe notes that rather than exhausting truths through words, maintaining emptiness and stillness is superior. Liu Ji synthesizes that both heaven-earth and sages achieve perpetual operation by mastering the mystery of "the one Qi (yiqi)"—the fundamental energy constituting all things. This profound state transcends language, and excessive explanation risks rigid understanding.

Collectively, the text reveals the Daoist wisdom of "non-action yet nothing left undone (wuwei er wubuwei)": an empty, serene mind responds optimally to worldly changes, while excessive speech or forced action proves counterproductive.

 糟粕弊精神於蹇淺非徒無益也故多言  數窮不如守中守中者内保之而外不蕩  也無思無爲寂然不動而守之於中如天  地橐籥之無心自然運用以其有眞君存  焉    谷神章第六 谷神不死是謂玄牝  碧虚子陳景元曰河上公章句谷者訓養  也神謂五藏之神肝藏魂肺藏魄心藏神  腎藏精脾藏志夫人能清靜虚空以養其  神不爲諸欲所染使形完神全故不死也  若觸情耽滯爲諸境所亂使形殘神去則  何道之可存哉  涑水司馬光曰中虚故曰谷不測故曰神  天地有窮而道無窮故曰不死玄者言其  妙牝者萬物之母  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰玄者杳冥而藏  神牝者冲和天太上此陰陽之宗天地之  祖今術家以口鼻爲玄牝非也  清源子劉驥曰靈樞經云天谷元神守之  自眞言人身中上有天谷泥丸藏神之府  也中有應谷絳宫藏氣之府也下有靈谷  關元藏精之府也天谷者元宫也乃元神  之室性之所存是神之要也聖人則天地  之要神守於元宫氣騰於牝府神氣交感  自然成眞眞合自然與道爲一而入於不  死不生故曰谷神不死是謂玄牝玄天也  牝地也人之形體法象天地所以靈樞以  天谷泥丸元神之室爲元宫以絳宫關元  精氣之府爲牝府玄牝者神氣之所要會  也  晦庵朱熹曰谷之虚也聲達焉則響應之
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the essential techniques of "guarding the center" (shouzhong) and the "valley spirit" (gushen) in Daoist cultivation.

Regarding the practice of "guarding the center": Excessive speech depletes one's Shen (spirit) and ultimately brings no benefit. It is far better to maintain a state of inner emptiness and stillness. "Guarding the center" means preserving internal stability while remaining undisturbed by external influences. One must achieve a state free from distracting thoughts and deliberate action, functioning as naturally as the bellows (tuoyue) between heaven and earth, for within this lies the true governance of the primordial spirit.

The interpretation of "the valley spirit never dies" (gushen busi): The valley spirit refers to the eternal life source within the human body, called the "mysterious female" (xuanpin, representing the root of Yin-Yang and the mother of all things). Various commentators have offered different explanations:

Chen Jingyuan, citing the Heshang Gong commentary, explains "valley" (gu) as nourishment and "spirit" (shen) as the spirits of the five viscera. If one can maintain a pure and empty state to nourish these spirits without contamination by desires, form and spirit will be preserved to achieve immortality. Conversely, indulgence in passions leads to their dispersion.

Sima Guang interprets "valley" as symbolizing emptiness and "spirit" as representing unfathomable transformations. While heaven and earth have limits, the Dao is boundless—hence "never dies." "Mysterious" (xuan) denotes profundity, and "female" (pin) signifies the mother of all things.

Cao Daochong points out that "mysterious" refers to the deep abode where spirit resides, while "female" represents the fundamental union of Yin and Yang. He criticizes contemporary practitioners who mistakenly identify the mouth and nose as the xuanpin.

Liu Ji quotes the Ling Shu Jing to explain three crucial bodily locations: the Niwan Palace at the crown (residing place of spirit), the Scarlet Palace in the chest (residing place of Qi), and the Guanyuan in the lower abdomen (residing place of Jing). In cultivation, one must settle the primordial spirit in the Niwan Palace, elevate essence-energy from the lower Dantian, and allow spirit and Qi to interact—thus uniting with the Dao to reach the state beyond life and death.

Zhu Xi employs the metaphor of mountain echoes to illustrate how emptiness and stillness alone can produce resonance.

 乃神化之自然也是謂玄牝玄妙也牝是  有所受而能生物者也至妙之理有生生  之意焉程子所以取老氏之說也又曰谷  是虚而能受神謂無所不應  黃茂材曰谷體虚虚能養神神常存故不  死谷神之道妙不可傳乃從而爲之說曰  是謂玄牝玄者妙道之門牝者生物之祖 玄牝之門是謂天地根  潁濱蘇轍曰玄牝之門言萬物自是出也  天地根言天地自是生也 綿綿若存用之不勤  潁濱蘇轍曰綿綿微而不絶也若存存而  不可見也能如是雖終日用之而不勞矣  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰綿綿者冲和不  絶之謂道貴無迹謂之有則滯謂之無則  頑故曰若存  黃茂材曰綿綿相繼之謂也綿綿若存所  以形容不死之道上士聞道勤而行之今  乃用之不勤何也勤者有時而不勤用之  不勤者無適而不勤與道合矣其爲勤莫  大焉    天長地久章第七 天長地乆天地所以能長且乆者以其不自 生故能長生  御註曰天穹窿而位乎上經爲日月緯爲  星辰而萬物覆焉地磅礴而位乎下結爲  山嶽融爲川澤而萬物載焉萬物覆載於  天地天地無心於萬物故天確然而常運  地隤然而常處所以能長且乆也天地有  心於生物則天俄而可度其覆物也淺矣  地俄而可測其載物也薄矣若是則烏能  長生
Interpretation

This passage explores the profound Daoist concept of "Mysterious Feminine" (xuanpin), referring to the universe's most subtle generative power. The term "mysterious" (xuan) signifies profound profundity, while "feminine" (pin) represents the life-giving maternal principle. This supreme truth contains the ceaseless creative power of generation, a concept later Confucian scholars like Cheng Yi of the Song dynasty drew upon from Laozi's teachings.

The valley (symbolizing emptiness) embodies receptivity through its hollowness, while the spirit (Shen, representing Dao's function) responds to all things without exception. Scholar Huang Maocai explains: the valley nurtures spiritual presence precisely through its emptiness, and because this divine presence endures, it never perishes. The principle of the valley spirit is so profound it defies verbal expression—we can only approximate it as the "gateway of the Mysterious Feminine." Here, "mysterious" signifies the portal to the Great Dao, while "feminine" denotes the source of all creation. This gateway constitutes the very root of heaven and earth.

Su Zhe (Master Yingbin) observes: The gateway of the Mysterious Feminine means all things emerge from it, while "root of heaven and earth" indicates their origination point. The description "continuously seeming to exist" (mianmian ruocun) captures its existential state—appearing subtle yet never interrupted, seemingly absent yet truly present. Those who attain this state can employ it endlessly without exhaustion.

Cao Daochong (Master Dao Zhen Ren Jing) clarifies: "Continuous" describes the unbroken harmony of Yin-Yang. The Great Dao values leaving no traces—if declared existent it appears rigid, if declared nonexistent it seems hollow, hence "seeming to exist." Huang Maocai adds: "Continuous" signifies perpetual flow, the very manifestation of eternal Dao. Superior practitioners hearing of this Dao diligently cultivate it, yet its application appears effortless, for in uniting with Dao, what seems like non-exertion actually achieves ultimate diligence.

Chapter Seven explains heaven and earth's enduring nature: The lofty heavens and substantial earth support sun, moon and stars above while bearing mountains and rivers below—all without conscious intention. Precisely because heaven and earth don't deliberately pursue growth, they achieve permanence. Had they striven to produce all things, heaven's covering capacity would exhaust quickly, earth's bearing strength would deplete rapidly—how could they endure? Like the vaulted sky and expansive earth that exist not for themselves, they thereby attain perennial vision.

 涑水司馬光曰凡有血氣之類皆營爲以  求生唯天地無爲而自生  潁濱蘇轍曰天地雖大而未離於形數則  其長久蓋有量矣然老子之言長久極於  天地蓋以人所見者言之耳若夫長久之  至則所謂天地始者是矣  王雱曰天地之不自生非利乎長久而然  道固如此而已所謂長久者亦瞬息之間  耳唯覆載傾陷而未嘗壞者乃其眞也  陸佃曰貪生者不生遺生者不死  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰不生者生之本  黃茂材曰萬物莫不資天地以生而天地  實未嘗生之人自生人獸自生獸禽魚草  木自生禽魚草木天地何與焉生生者不  生萬物所以代謝相仍不生者不死天地  所以長乆不已人能同於天地豈有不長  生乎 是以聖人後其身而身先外其身而身存  御註曰天地之與聖人咸得乎道而聖人  所以治其身亦天地已故此章先言天地  之不自生而繼之以聖人不自有其身也  碧虚子陳景元曰聖人無爲身在廟堂而  心游姑射法天地之覆載均養無私大有  處謙不敢爲天下先其百姓欣戴樂推而  不厭故先又能忘功忘名外身寡欲其天  下愛之如父母神明祐之若赤子故存  潁濱蘇轍曰如使天地與物競生而聖人  與人爭得則天地亦一物耳聖人亦一人  耳何以大過之哉  王雱曰聖人雖聖而形與物齊唯體天道
Interpretation

Sima Guang (Northern Song statesman) remarked: All living beings labor tirelessly for survival, yet Heaven and Earth exist effortlessly through non-action (Wuwei).

Su Zhe (style name Yingbin) explained: Though vast in scale, Heaven and Earth remain constrained by physical form—their longevity has limits. What Laozi calls "enduring" appears as Heaven and Earth from the human perspective, but true eternity resides in the primordial state before Heaven and Earth took form.

Wang Pang (Song dynasty scholar) observed: Heaven and Earth don't strive for existence—their perpetuity isn't pursued but naturally manifests through the Dao. What we deem "long-lasting" lasts but an instant in cosmic terms. Only that which upholds all things without collapsing constitutes real permanence.

Lu Dian (Song dynasty scholar) dialectically noted: Those obsessed with longevity often fail to attain it, while those transcending life and death achieve true immortality.

Cao Daochong (Daoist name Master Renjing) revealed the essence: The seemingly non-generative state (Dao) is actually life's very source.

Huang Maocai elaborated further: While all things appear to depend on Heaven and Earth for growth, these celestial forces don't actively create. Humans, animals, and plants propagate naturally—Heaven and Earth merely provide the environment. True eternity belongs not to the ceaseless cycle of generation and dissolution, but to the unchanging laws governing Heaven and Earth. By emulating these cosmic principles, humans too may attain longevity.

Thus the Daode Jing states: "The sage withdraws yet ends up ahead, transcends self yet achieves preservation." Emperor Huizong's imperial commentary notes: Both sages and Heaven-Earth follow the Dao—this chapter first discusses cosmic principles before addressing sagely conduct.

Chen Jingyuan (Daoist name Master Bixu) described the sage's state: Though attending courtly affairs, the sage's spirit roams free like the immortal of Mount Guye. Emulating Heaven-Earth's all-embracing nature, humility brings public reverence; detachment from fame invites divine protection.

Su Zhe employed reductio ad absurdum: Should Heaven-Earth compete with creatures, or sages vie with commoners for gain, they'd become ordinary entities—how then could their greatness manifest?

Wang Pang concluded: Though sages possess wisdom, their physical form resembles ordinary people—the crucial distinction lies in aligning with celestial patterns.

 而不爭迺能獨異於衆使其立己而與衆  敵則匹夫匹婦皆足以勝之   劉涇曰聖人與天地同則後身外身猶之  不自生也身先身存猶之長乆也後身謂  屈己外身謂忘我  道眞仁靜先生曹道沖曰後其身而身先  退己進人爲衆所推爲後而反先外其身  而身存齊生死者不爲生死所累外形骸  者不爲形骸所礙  清源子劉驥曰人處天地之中與天地分  一炁而治所以不能與天地同其長久者  以其有爲有欲貪生太厚也是以聖人後  其身而不敢有爲外其身而不敢有欲人  皆取先己獨取後是謂後其身忘其肝膽  遺其耳目外死生遺禍福是謂外其身後  其身而不先外其身而不存芒然彷徨乎  塵垢之外逍遥乎無爲之業隳肢體黜聰  明離形去智同於大通與道同乆則身不  期先而先不期存而存  黃茂材曰後其身所以處世也外其身所  以體道也今有人焉卑遜廉退鄉里推之  朝廷高之則夫離形去智遺世獨立必能  長存亦可知矣 非以其無私耶故能成其私  御註曰天地之大德曰生聖人之大寳曰  位天地體道故無私無私故長乆聖人體  道故無私無私故常存  碧虚子陳景元曰天地生育萬物而聖人  外己全民皆不以仁恩自恃豈有自私之  心乎實無私也無私故能長久以其長久  故始能成其私也
Interpretation

To stand apart from the crowd, one must refrain from contention. If a person insists on distinguishing themselves by opposing the multitude, even ordinary men and women can surpass them.

Liu Jing explains: The sages (those who have attained the Dao) align with the movement of heaven and earth. They willingly take the rear position and transcend their personal form, just as heaven and earth do not deliberately pursue growth. What appears as yielding actually leads the way; what seems indifferent to life actually preserves it—this is the enduring Way. "Taking the rear position" refers to self-restraint, while "transcending the self" means rising above petty individuality.

Cao Daochong (known by his Daoist name, Master Zhenren Jing) elaborates further: By actively yielding, one paradoxically takes the lead, for humility elevates a person in the eyes of others. What seems like falling behind actually moves ahead. Those who transcend physical existence are not bound by life and death; those who surpass bodily limitations are not hindered by their form.

Liu Ji (known as Master Qingyuan) says: Humans exist between heaven and earth, originally sharing the same primordial Qi (innate energy) as the cosmos. The reason they cannot endure as long as heaven and earth is due to excessive deliberate action and desire, an overattachment to life. Thus, the sage willingly takes the rear without forcing their way and transcends the self without craving. While others rush ahead, the sage alone remains behind—this is "taking the rear position." Forgetting sensory perception and rising above life, death, fortune, and misfortune—this is "transcending the self." Seemingly yielding yet never truly behind, detached from form yet truly present, they roam freely beyond the mundane world, wandering in the realm of Wuwei (non-action). Letting go of physical senses, discarding cleverness and cunning, freeing themselves from the constraints of body and mind, they merge with the great Dao. Without striving to lead, they naturally take the lead; without seeking permanence, they endure eternally.

Huang Maocai observes: Taking the rear position is the way to navigate the world; transcending the self is the method to realize the Dao. In reality, those who are humble and yielding are esteemed in their villages and employed in high office. From this, we can understand that those who surpass physical form and stand independently in the world will surely endure.

Is it not precisely because they are selfless that they ultimately fulfill themselves? The Imperial Commentary states: The highest virtue of heaven and earth is the nurturing of life; the highest treasure of the sage is proper positioning. Heaven and earth follow the Dao, and thus they are selfless—selflessness leads to endurance. The sage emulates the Dao, and thus they are selfless—selflessness leads to permanence.

Chen Jingyuan (known as Master Bixu) adds: Heaven and earth nurture the myriad things; the sage sacrifices the small self to preserve the people. Neither claims benevolence—how could they harbor selfishness? True selflessness leads to endurance, and because they endure, they ultimately fulfill themselves.

 穎濱蘇轍曰道則然耳  劉涇曰天地不自生與聖人之後外其身  皆無私也然天地以此長乆聖人以此存  則皆成其私也  黃茂材曰人皆亡己獨存物皆夭己獨壽  非私乎  程大昌曰不自私者乃所以遂其私歟    上善若水章第八 上善若水  御註曰易曰一陰一陽之謂道繼之者善  也莊子曰離道以善善名既立則道之體  虧然天一生水離道未遠淵而虚靜而明  是謂天下之至精故曰上善若水  碧虚子陳景元曰至人虚懷無欲應變隨  時不逆諸縁處善忘善故曰上善水能方  圓凝釋深淺浮沉順道涵虚咸有其理惟  至人兼而通之故曰若水  臨川王安石曰善者可以繼道而未足以  盡道故上善之人若水矣  劉涇曰易曰繼之者善莊子曰離道以善  皆謂自道而降莫近於善  清源子劉驥曰天一生水亦去道未遠故  上善若水 水善利萬物而不爭處衆人所惡故幾於道  御註曰融爲雨露萬彚以滋凝爲霜雪萬  寳以成疏爲江河聚爲沼沚萬物皆往資  焉而不匱以利萬物孰善於此善利萬物  萬物蒙其澤受其施而常處於柔弱不爭  之地納污受垢不以累乎其心故於道爲  近幾近也  碧虚子陳景元曰水藴三能之近道天無  水則陽旱地無水則塵飛利澤萬物故曰  善利此一能也去實歸虚背高趨下壅之
Interpretation

Su Zhe (styled Yingbin) said: The Dao is simply that which exists spontaneously.

Liu Jing explained: Heaven and Earth do not act for themselves in nurturing all things, and the sage does not place himself first—neither has selfish intent. Yet Heaven and Earth endure because of this, and the sage preserves himself because of this—paradoxically, both achieve their own eternity.

Huang Maocai raised a question: If all others perish while one alone remains, if all things wither while one alone attains longevity—is this not selfishness?

Cheng Dachang concluded: Those who do not seek personal gain ultimately fulfill their own desires.

Chapter Eight discusses the principle that "the highest goodness is like water":

The highest form of goodness resembles water. The Yijing states that the alternation of Yin and Yang is the Dao, and what inherits the Dao is goodness. Zhuangzi, however, argues that deliberately pursuing the reputation of goodness harms the essence of the Dao. Yet water is nurtured by Heaven and Earth, never far from the origin of the Dao—deep, tranquil, and clear, it can truly be called the most refined existence in the world. Thus, the highest goodness is like water.

Chen Jingyuan (styled Bixuzi) added: Those who attain the Dao maintain a mind of emptiness and desirelessness, adapting to the changes of circumstance without defying fate. They act with goodness yet do not cling to its name—hence, it is called "highest goodness." Water can be square or round, frozen or flowing, deep or shallow, buoyant or sinking—wholly following natural law while encompassing all. Only those of supreme virtue can be as penetrating as water.

Wang Anshi (of Linchuan) believed: Goodness can inherit the Dao but does not fully embody it, so those with the highest virtue resemble water.

Liu Jing cited the Yijing and Zhuangzi: Descending from the Dao, what comes closest to it is goodness.

Liu Ji (styled Qingyuanzi) observed: Water is the first substance formed between Heaven and Earth, never distant from the origin of the Dao, and thus the highest goodness resembles it.

The goodness of water lies in nourishing all things without contention, willingly occupying the low places that others despise—thus, it is closest to the Dao. Transforming into rain and dew, it moistens all things; condensing into frost and snow, it ensures abundant harvests; flowing as rivers and gathering as lakes, it sustains all beings yet never exhausts itself. Nothing is more adept at benefiting all things than water. Though all creatures receive its grace, water remains soft and non-contentious, embracing impurity without resentment—hence, it is nearest to the Dao. "Ji" here means "close to."

Chen Jingyuan noted three ways in which water approaches the Dao: Without water, Heaven would parch, and Earth would turn to dust—water benefits all things, which is the first mark of its goodness. Flowing into emptiness, descending to the lowest places, even when obstructed...

 則止决之則行聽從於人故曰不爭此二  能也人之情惡處下流好居上位而水則  就卑受濁令物潔白獨納污辱故曰處衆  人之所惡此三能也  潁濱蘇轍曰二者皆自無而始成形故其  理同道無所不在無所不利而水亦然然  而既已麗於形則於道有間矣故曰幾於  道然而可名之善未有若此者也故曰上  善  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰柔弱者俗之所  耻污下者俗之所惡水性獨異於俗  黃茂材曰水有上善一小善七利物不爭  處衆人之所惡上善也人能體此可幾於  道 居善地心善淵與善仁言善信政善治事善 能動善時夫惟不爭故無尤矣  碧虚子陳景元曰至人所居善執謙下化  及鄉黨如水在地善就卑下滋潤群物故  曰居善地此一善也至人之心善保虚靜  洞鑒幽微如水淵澄波流九變不失明靜  故曰心善淵此二善也至人善行仁慈惠  及天下如水膏潤無不霑濟故曰與善仁  此三善也至人之言善守誠信不與物期  自然符契如水景物妍醜無差流滿輒移  行險不失故曰言善信此四善也至人從  政善治於民正容格物物自順從如水清  平善定高下滌蕩群物使無塵穢故曰政  善治此五善也至人臨事善能任物隨器  授職不失其材如水柔性善事方圓能隨  形器無用不成故曰事善能此六善也至
Interpretation

This scripture uses the characteristics of water as a metaphor for the moral cultivation of Dao practitioners. Several commentators elucidate the seven virtuous qualities of water from different perspectives, and how humans might emulate them.

Su Zhe observes that water, like the Dao (the Way), begins from formlessness before taking concrete shape, hence sharing the same underlying principle. Though water has already assumed tangible form, it still differs from the ultimate Dao, which explains why it is described as "approaching the Dao." Among all named virtues, none surpasses the perfection of water, thus it is called "supreme virtue" (shangshan).

Cao Daochong notes that softness and occupying low positions are qualities despised by worldly standards, yet water's nature directly contradicts conventional values. Huang Maicai summarizes water's seven virtues: benefiting all without contention and dwelling in places people detest (these two constituting supreme virtue), plus five lesser virtues.

Chen Jingyuan elaborates how water's seven virtues correspond to a cultivator's refinement:

The first virtue is excelling at choosing humble positions, like water flowing downward to nourish all things;

The second virtue is maintaining inner emptiness and stillness, mirroring a deep pool's clarity;

The third virtue is practicing benevolent care, as water universally nourishes without discrimination;

The fourth virtue is speaking with integrity, reflecting reality as faithfully as water mirrors landscapes;

The fifth virtue is governing effectively, leveling unevenness and cleansing impurities like water regulates all things;

The sixth virtue is skillful employment, adapting to various containers like water conforms to different vessels;

The seventh virtue is timely action, flowing according to seasonal changes like water's movements.

The passage concludes that precisely because water contends with nothing, it remains flawless. Practitioners who emulate these watery virtues may thereby approach the realm of the Dao.

 人動靜善觀其時出處應機能全其道如  水之動善隨時變冬凝夏液不差其節故  曰動善時此七善也  潁濱蘇轍曰避高趨下未嘗有所逆善地  也空虚靜默深不可測善淵也利澤萬物  施而不求報善仁也圓必旋方必折塞必  止决必流善信也洗滌群穢平準高下善  治也遇物賦形而不留於一善能也冬凝  春泮涸溢不失節善時也有善而不免於  人非者以其爭也水惟不爭故兼七善而  無尤  劉涇曰善以處下爲居水以就下爲地在  善則得水之地故曰居善地善以安靜爲  心水以深靜爲淵在善則得水之淵故曰  心善淵善以教人爲與水以利物爲仁在  善則得水之仁故曰與善仁善以不欺爲  言水以行險不失爲信在善則得水之信  故曰言善信善以正己物正爲政水以激  揚清濁爲治在善則得水之治故曰政善  治善以同心爲事水以圓方而不滯爲能  在善則得水之能故曰事善能善以爲動  水以冬凝春泮爲時在善則得水之時故  曰動善時言上善當如水以不爭爲善也  以不爭爲利乃能兼此七者而爲天所祐  人所助也何過之有乎  黃茂材曰其小善七居善地者潴而爲澤  也心善淵者靜可以鑒也與善仁者濟物  之功博也言善信者其流聲不息也政善  治者可以濯垢污也事善能者因器而爲
Interpretation

This scripture uses the characteristics of water to illustrate seven virtues that a Daoist cultivator should embody. Su Zhe explains: Water always avoids high places and flows downward (symbolizing humility and non-contention), which is called "dwelling in good places" (ju shan di). Water appears empty yet holds unfathomable depth (symbolizing inner stillness), called "a mind good at depths" (xin shan yuan). Water nourishes all things without seeking reward (symbolizing benevolence), called "giving with good kindness" (yu shan ren). Water turns with roundness, bends with squareness, stops when blocked, and flows when released (symbolizing trustworthiness), called "words good at keeping faith" (yan shan xin). Water can cleanse filth and balance unevenness (symbolizing governance), called "governing with good order" (zheng shan zhi). Water adapts to the shape of any container (symbolizing adaptability), called "handling affairs with good capability" (shi shan neng). Water freezes in winter and melts in spring (symbolizing timing), called "moving with good timing" (dong shan shi).

Liu Jing further elaborates: All these qualities of water stem from its fundamental nature of "non-contention" (bu zheng). Precisely because it does not contend, water can simultaneously possess these seven virtues without incurring faults. If cultivators can emulate water's non-contending nature, they will receive divine protection and human assistance, naturally avoiding all transgressions.

Huang Maocai illustrates with concrete imagery: Water gathering to form marshes represents "dwelling in good places." A calm water surface reflecting all things represents "a mind good at depths." Water extensively nourishing myriad beings represents "giving with good kindness." The ceaseless sound of flowing water represents "words good at keeping faith." Water's ability to cleanse impurities represents "governing with good order." Water changing shape with its container represents "handling affairs with good capability." All these demonstrate how cultivators should model themselves after water's qualities.

 方圓也動善時者冬凝春則泮也此七者  能其一亦可以爲善人而未若不爭之爲  上不爭故無尤  程大昌曰八十一章其申言不爭之益者  凡六曰不自伐故有功不自矜故長夫惟  不爭故天下莫能與之爭是其一也欲上  人而下之欲先人而後之以其不爭故天  下莫能與之爭則其二也天道不爭而善  勝三也聖人之道爲而不爭四也戰而不  武勝而不與是謂不爭之德五也與此之  不爭無尤者凡六也夫其謂爭者非必至  於鬭且戰也彼己匹對兩不相下斯謂爭  矣天之陰陽至神而無著也然常以冬夏  二至而爭蓋已居其地者未退而方來待  代者欲前此之謂爭故爭者對起而不退  聽之謂也有待
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the principle of "non-contention" (不争). Laozi teaches that one should emulate water's natural adaptability ("方圓也動善時" - being square or round, moving in perfect timing), just as ice forms in winter and melts in spring with impeccable timing. While embodying any single aspect of this makes one virtuous, none compare to the state of non-contention. By not contending with others, one remains free from fault ("无尤" - without blame).

Scholar Cheng Dachang observed that six chapters in the 81 chapters of the Dao De Jing specifically extol the benefits of non-contention: First, avoiding self-praise preserves one's achievements; second, true leadership requires humility, and genuine advancement necessitates retreat; third, the Dao's operation appears non-contentious yet naturally prevails; fourth, the sage's way is to act without contention; fifth, military victory without aggression exemplifies the "Virtue of Non-Contention" (不争之德); and sixth, the present passage's teaching that "through non-contention, there is no blame."

Here, "contention" need not imply physical conflict—any mutual stubbornness or deadlock qualifies. Consider the Yin-Yang (阴阳) interplay governing natural laws: even during the profound solstice transitions, when outgoing and incoming energies vie for dominance, a momentary contention arises. Yet Daoist practitioners transcend this, embodying nature's flowing wisdom through attunement rather than opposition.

乎道者則不然矣 道德眞經集註卷之二

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0095); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 1 Vol. 3 →